1981-06-01 RM Exhibits
".
RIGHT TO VOTE ASSOCIATION VIEWS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY CAPITOL PROGRAMS
~ !&):.JZ!lLL P, /f/
.:
Water and Sewer
1. The plan outlined seems unrealistic in today's economic situation.
We do not believe the voters of New Hanover County will approve $29 Million
I
dollars in bonds over the next 4 years for this project.
2. The County Commission should make efforts to insure that by building
a County Water and Sewer System, they are not making it easier for
Wilmington to Annex county residents...since water and sewer is the most
I
,.,-j-#/"
expensive service municipalities must furnish.
3. We question the need for a County Water System. The State Hydrologist
has stated that New Hanover County has a 30 million gallon per day ground
water supply. The only contamination found in this supply has been
photographic developing chemicals from the Star News in an isolated area
of the Coupty.
Solid Waste
1. We feel the Cornnission knows the importance of this plan and we feel
the voters will approve the needed Bond Issue to complete this issue.
Airport
1. The Plan calls for'$540,000 in 82-83 for a crash/fire/rescue station.
We would like to know what was just built at the airport. We were under
the impression a Crash/fire/rescue station was just built.
2. We question the need for $15 thousand dollars to plan and design a
crash vehicle. This vehicle should be a stock item that the County will
not have to design.
3. We question the size of the generator called for in the plan.
150,000 KW would furnish enough electricity for over 30,000 homes.
I
4. Our copy of this plan does not show hwere the monies are coming from
for airport projects. Before this plan is approved, the fund designation
should be specified, ~sp. the $600,000 for 81-82.
\~
;J
Board of Education
I. This 10 year plan shows 1.3 million dollats for repair and upkeep to
existing buildings but does not show any monies for Capital expenditures
I
after 81-82.
. I
We feel it is very lmportant that there be a long range
I
plan for new schools. We also feel the Commission should take steps to
I
insure all County owned buildings are maintaiD'ed properly. The best
I
insurance plan a building can have is a good maintenance program. If
the individual departments cannot accomplish this, then the Commission
I
should take steps to insure all County BUildin1gs are maintained properly.
I
Parks and Recreation
1. We feel spending $500,000 in 81-82 on a Pa~ks and Recreation Administration
I
Office is unnecessary and it is significantly ~hanging the nature of
Hugh,McCree Park. It is also changing the level of service for one section
of the County while many other areas of the Cohnty are still in need of area
parks.
..
Sherj,ffs Department
I. Everyone in New Hanover County is tired ofl spending money on the
I
Law ~nforcement Center. If, in fact, it is already overcrowded, we
question how much expansion can be accomplished for $60,000. If more
money is to be spent on this building, the Commission should, insure
that it is going to be sufficient for the next'10 years and not just
immediate needs.
\~
'-
~ a-;xaz:- i ~1'1
BEFORE THE OO!RD OF COU~!rY
COftMISSIOtIERS
'*
\.
STATE OF NOR'!'H CARULINA
1'-. C01Jh"TY OF NE".i HANOVER
IN THE }f-A1:TEa OF CLOSIiiG
OF PUBLIC ROAD
ORDER
It appearing to the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County that
a resolution of intent to close that portion of 2nd Street (now being knmm as 47th
Street) in Winter Park Gardens of New Hanover County, North Carolina, ru.'1ning from
Pine Grove Drive to Peachtree Street for a distance of approximately 78 feet, was
adopted on the ~/d day of
/i . .1
6LA-;::>/uJ":'.,'
v
resolution called for a public hearing to be held on the
, 19 '?/
, and it further
appearing that said
_t.
/ /Z(.
day or
9~
, 19 .9- / , at which time all persons would
be heard on tr~ question of whether or not the closing would be detrimental to the
public int.erest, or the property rights of a.'1y :ipdividual, and it further appearing
that notice of said hearL,g was pub listed in the Wilm1n~on Star-New's :NmlSpaper in
accordance with General Statutes 153A-2ul, and that all persona were heard on the
question of i,;,i1ethet'" or not the closing would be detrimental to the public interest.
or the property rights of any individual, and the County Commissioners are of the
I
opinion th~t said puplic road in the Co~"'1ty of New Hanover should be closed al'.d
removed from dedication and the closing of same is in the public interest, the
legal desc::-ip'tion of said street being as follows:
BEGIhlf-DiG at an iron pipe at the intersection of the northern
right of way line of Peachtree Avenue (30.0 feet from ~~8 center
line thereof)(Peachtree Avenue formerly being only 33.0 feet wide)
and theW'estern right of way lit'le of 2nd Street(33",O feet from the
centerline thereof) as shown en the official map of WL~ter Park
originally recorded in Lands and Dowers Book '!tAlt a;t Page 509;
rUnning thence from. said beginning point, . along the wastern right
of l..J'ay-lins-of said 2nd Street, North 10 deg.. 40 !l'!.i..?'l. East 96..95
feet to an iron pipe in the southwestern right of way line of Pine
Grove Drive (5. R. #1492)(30.0 feet from the centerli"'19 thereof as
now constructed)(shown as Masonboro Road on aforementioned map of
Winter Park); running thence, along the southwestern right or way
line of said Pine Grove Drive, Somth 45 deg. 00 min. East 79.93
feet to a point, the eastern right of way line of said 2nd Street;
running thence, along the eastern right of way line of said 2nd
Street, South 10 deg. hO min. West 51. 74 feet to a. point in the
northern right of way line of aforementioned Peachtree Avenue
(30.0 feet from the centerline thereof); running thence, along
the northern right of way line of said Peachtree Avenue, North
79 deg. 20 min. West 66.0 feet to the point of beginning, the
same being 2nd Street bet~een Peachtree Avenue and Pine Grove
Drive, said 2nd Street never having been used as a street between
Peachtree Avenue and Pine Grove Drive.
.;.~ .
ol~.'
,...
Ii
!
.
\ NOil, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED JU1D DECREED that the above described
road be and the same is hereby closed and removed from dedication. It is
farther ORDERED that aeopy of this order be filed in the Office of the
Register of Deeds of New Hanover County~ North Carolina.
This the I ~ day of
~
t/
, 19 e-I 0
1/ '7!..-1 11- -
Jj (LtLf~---' t.... . i.../_l-:?(:;C-C~
tJ-t-ce...- - Chairm.an of the Board of He-", Hanover
County Commissioners
',\ > ,\ '.) ': ::,:1
, \\\,
,1 'ii,
l;) J, ~ i
f ,./ I ! 1
\ ~ " \
AT'fc:iT:
. . t?, '.' I g
/<:/~'/. .A') - ./?:,: ~:' ;." .'
".//.--.J__ !/,-JI I.. ../..:-' ! ,A-). . ,_ 'L "j' L. '*-(~'''>'1Ll.1 ' .
County/Clerk ,/ i ) i \' \ > ,". ~'
~ . . " - " \ ;
,. /i ;' l"; \,
1, ,\ \' )
STATE OF NORTH-CA"tt,OLINA
COUNTY OF 'NEW HANOVER
~ _ /1 /--:-)..'
I, ',/~~./V'~ :> - U~...L~ , a Notarj Public in and ~ the .
State and County aforesaid, do/hereby certify that CLzvv>--X--" L3. (j::':(A_:z-n",,,-,"-</-'-R..-
personally appeared before me, and who being duly sworn,fsays that ....----U<.--knws
the common sea:b of 1'-?e Coun~y of New Hanov:er and is acquainted with '
1"('..c.J-~ (' 4~~ , who i~airman of the Board of N~ Hanover
County COi!1m..ssioners, and that ~~ , the said ~___~_"-' -:6 . Ov..-<--~,~.1.-L,.,
is Clerk of the Board of New Hanov~ County CornmissioneJjS, and saw the said
/6~4___ .?~7A_-<J''''''..j ~hairl'llan of the Board of New Hanover
County Comlllissioners, sign the foregoing instrument", and saw the said common
seal of said }iew Hanover County af'f~"ted to said ,iilstrul'Ile,nt by sai~airman,
and tha.t ~j:~_ ~he said CLe-,,~~ 13WA~--r7tJt:1 Clerk as
aforesaid, signed ~i(~~'name in ~s~ation of the due execution of said
instr:;~;::h:.:~::C:o::r::d~.a:i:: :~ the ;= ::yN:; Hf:~ _' 19 N
I { "
.
; \ 1 \"
'l .
,;!10"-r...-jA-^_?""")
Notary Public
Po) ~/
- ~~,-p-.;:z;;c-
i "
i \.\ "
"'i !,
,
" ,.. \\
, ' ,
MY Commission Erpires:
~;1~-Z:;:~ i I
(/
/ '!t:> ~/ -.
-~0
~J
1~