1981-12-21 RM Exhibits
, .-
. '.!
~
~v~ 1S/c-,7J];C.?" ~o~ ~s-
(ARTICLE V.- S~PARATION, DISCIPLINARY ACTION, AND REINSTATEMENT)
Sec. 8. Failure in Performance of Duties
An employee whose work is unsatisfactory over a period of time will be
notified by the supervisor in what way the employee's work is deficient, and
what must be done if the work is to be satisfactory.
'It
An employee who is suspended, demoted or dismissed for unsatisfactory
performance will normally receive at least three written warnings before dis-
ciplinary action.ia taken by the appointing authority. The three warnings may
result from any kind or claas of conduct, related or unrelated, constituting
failure of performance of duties at any time during employment" and are not
limited to those listed in subparagraphs (a) through (a) ** in this section.*
The fi~st two written warnings must be issued by the employee's supervisor and
shall set forth the points for which the employee has received the warning, and
the corrected performance that must take place. The third written warning must
be issued by the department head serving the notice upon the employee that correct
performance must take place immediately in order to' avoid suspension, demotion or
dismissal. The employee shall be required to acknowledge by his signature the
receipt of all such warnings.*
The supervisor and the department head must record the dates of their
discussions with the employee, the performance deficiencies discussed and the
corrective action recommended, and must forward copies of the letters of warning
to the Personnel Office to be filed in the employee's personnel folder.
The employee must be allowed at leaat five (5) work days to respond to the
charges in the third warning before any determination is made by the appointing
authority concerning demotion or dismissal. DJ,lrtng this period, upon the approval
of,the department head, the employee can: be suspended pending' final determination.
l/
/.
. .
.",.:) .'
(ARTICLE V. - SEPARATION, DISCIPLINARY ACTION, AND REINSTATEMENT)
Sec. l4. Employee Appeal
-~
A permanent employee wishing to appeal a letter of warning, a supen-
sion, demotion or dismissal may, within five (5) working days after the disci-
plinary action and after notifying his Department Head in writing of his intentions,
,
appeal the ac~ion in writing to the Personnel Officer. The appeal must contain,
the response of the employee to the charges, a response to the disciplinary actions
.taken, and the remedy ,desired by the employee and any other pertinent information.
(
The Personnel Officer shall make a recommendation to the County Manager within
ten (10) working days after receipt of the appeal. The recommendation will in-
clude the specifics to the charges, and what additional actions he feels should
be taken. The County Manager, at his discretion, mayor may not hear the employee.
If no hearing is scheduled, the County Manager will render a decision within ten
I
(10) working days following receipt of the recommendation from the Personnel Officer.
The response will include the basis for the decision and the evidence relied upon.
In the event a hearing is held, the appealing party and his Department
Head will both be present and have the right to be represented by counsel. Either
party may request the presence of any person who will provide information that will
assist the County Manager in rendering a decision. The names of all such persons,
and how they are related to the case shall be submitted to the County Manager no
later than five (5) working days prior to the hearing date. The County Manager
will reserve the right to limit the number of persons to appear. The County Manager
will render a decision within ten (10) working days after the hearing, including
the basis for the decision and the evidence relied upon.
The decision of the County Manager will be final.
The decision of the County Manage.r wiil be sent to the home of the appeal-
ing party by registered mail.
All hearings provided for herein shall be held during working hours.,.
..
. "
1
(ARTICLE VII- LEAVE OF ABSENCE)
Sec. 17.
Leave Without Pay - Policy
.~
A permanent full-time, permanent part-time, or probationary employee,
upon the recommendation of his Department Head may be granted a leave of
absence without pay for up to one. .year by the County Manager p except that
temporary employees will be granted Leave Without Pay, if necessary, while
on Worker's Compensation leave. The leave will be used for reasons of
personal or family disability, continuation of education, or performance of
special work that will permit the County to benefit by the experience gained
or work performed, or such other reasons for which Leave Without Pay is deemed
to be in the best interests of the County by the County Manage~.
The employee will apply in writing to the supervisor for leave. The
employee is obligated to return to duty within or at the end of the time approved
by the County Manager. If the employee decides not to return to work, he should
notify the supervisor immediately. Upon returning to duty after being on Leave
Without Pay, the employee shall be entitled to return to the same position
held at the time leave was granted. Failure to report at the expiration ,of a
leave of absence, unless an extension has been granted, will be considered a
resignation.
o
. .
1
,(ARTICLE VII:- LEAVE OF ABSENC:E)
-.
Sec. 22.
Maternity Leave - County's Responsibility
On recommendation of the Department Head and with the approval of the
County Manager, a permanent full-time, permanent part-time~ or probationary
.~
employee will be granted maternity leave without pay, for a reasonable period
of time, when the employee desires to be away from work due to pregnancy, mis-
carriage, abortiori, childbirth. or recovery.
Based on the type and nature of work performed, the supervisor will be
responsible for determining, in consultation with the employee and upon advice
she has received from her physician, how far into the pregnancy the employee
should work.
Reinstatement to the same position or one of like classification, senior-
ity, and pay must be made upon the employee's return to work.
Sec. 23.
Maternity Leave - Employee's Responsibility
The employee will apply in writing to her supervisor for leave~ designat-
ing her choice of the maternity leave options. The Department Head will revie~ ,
the request, and make a recommendation to the County Manager for his approval.
The employee is obligated to retun to duty within or at the end of the time
approved. If the emp~oyee finds that she will not return to work, she should
o
notify her supervisor immediately. If the employee determines that additional
leave time will be necessary, she should make a written request to her supervisor
for\an extension of the leave prior to the end of that leave period. Failure
to report to work at the expiration of a leave of absence", unless an extension
has been granted, will be considered a resignation.
LARRY J. POWELL
Tax Administrator
~ 4L\~. p~~ S-J-. /? f0.w.f(I7..~vtt--.
.',', ' ,";,,1"0'., .' iI"/)' ""'. 'c-.+-4J.A.':!
,. . u., Gb'c~'~
.. NEW HANOVER C~UNTY. ;c;j;v
OFFICE OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATOR I 2- ~ ILf- ~I ~
320 CHESTNUT STREET
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090
Telephone (919) 763.099 I
NEW HANOVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTrONS
Collections Thru Nove~ber 30, 1981
1981
I I
i '
1980
Charged Per Scroll
Discoveries Added
Less Abatements
Total Taxes Due New Hanover County
Collections To Date
Outstanding Balance
Percentage Collected
$16,411,131.85
2,394,059.11
$18,805,190.96
18,791. 76
$18,786,399.20
- 5,156,172;;56
$13,630,226.64
27.45%
$14,147,201.61'
1,796,886.00
$15,944,087.61
30,925.16
$15,913,162.45
- 5,588,920.45
$10,324,242.00
35.12%
Back Taxes
Real Estate Taxes
Less Abatements
Collections To Date
Outstanding Balance
Percentage Collected
I
$ 475,767.69 $ 431,682.45
2,403.81 2,175.20
114,042.70 92,665.84
$ :)59,321.18 $ 336,841.41
24.09% 21.58%
$ 637,438.18 $ 541,623.28
618.28 713.59
50,870.61 43,215.39
$ 585,949.29 $ 497,694.30
7.99% 7.99%
Personal Property Taxes
Less Abatements
Collections To Date
Outstanding Balance
Percentage Collected
Total money processed through Collections Office for New Hanover County,
City of Wilmington, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach and Wrightsville Beach to
date $7,385,298.34.
This report is for fiscal year beginning July 1, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
~, 11 n .
---1. o.ln CZo... r. V ~ . f\ N
Patricia J. aynor~
Collector of Revenue
PJR/pg
MEMBER
INTERNA nONAl ASSOCIA liON OF ASSESSING OFFICERS
Y1.1AA'~'Aj-.,IM-~~.-R~..SS-: (!.~",.:" ..
7-"-;.'-~-' .'. . .....Ii 0<. ..... -L ~,"
-, :' . . .'; ,:' ".' ',. .: .:" (!'~~/" ", ~..
. ..; ", " '., , '", lajov
. / 2- '- I tf.- fS/ ~ ' .
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
December 14, 1981
Mr. G. Felix Cooper
County Manager ,afJ
,Larry J. powell-J7Y
Tax Administrator
Subject: Abatements and Refunds
,I
I
Request the following taxes be released as the taxpayers
reported incorrect or incomplete information at the time of listing:
l.
2,.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
.22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Johnny Bordeaux
Duane Cook
William Cothren
C. E. Crowell
James Crowell
Routh Di:~{On
Milton Faulk
W. C. Grimstead
H. &H. Enterprises, Inc.
William Heinberg
M. L. Hicks
Patricia Hobbs
Roy Hood
Alan Jones
Chester Kropp
M. & M. Transmissions, Inc.
Susan McChesney
Kathryn Murdock
John Newber
Peanut Shack
Anne Seawell
Joseph Smith
Sally Sullivan
E. W. Todd
Stephen Wardenfelt
James Williamson
$ 48.06
66.97
108.96
3.61
187.55
16.14 (Refund)
66.66
4.28
211.43
43.87
30.86
26.49
121.46 (Refund)
109.64
21. 02
27.28
49.43
45.25
16.05
487.87
106.33
5.38
18.92
135.75
9.25
67.43
Request the following taxes be released as the personal
property is not located within the city or town limits:
1. Camille Bishop $ 33.96
2. Samuel Drain 44.84 (1976)
3. Rhonda Freeman 33.25
4. Judy Hicks 24.80
5. Doris Johnson 68.16
6. Steven Mitchell 48.39
7. Luther Peele 107.61
8. Clayton Price 53.91
9. Gary Sloan 56.76
Request the following taxes be released as they are
double charged;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
,Mr,.'G. 'Felix' Cooper
Page 2 :
December 14,1981
,". . ~\
~'. ~ .
'..r". , .
:. ',~
"'." ,
. , ~
(Refund)
(1979)
(Refund)
(1980)
(1979)
.1
I
!
(1980)
Request the following taxes be released as these charges are
due to clerical errors of incorrect encoding, not allowing qualifying
Senior Citizens/Disability Exclusions, incorrect penalty, incorrect
building components, mispriced land, mispriced vehicles, addition
errors, etc.:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24'.
25.
Osca'r Capps
Travis Cooke
Callie Garris
Morris Gesser
Arnold Henegar
Barbara Johnson
Donna Keen
Delma'r Kelly
William Kelly
Mary Meeks
N. C. National Bank
James Palmeter
Vend A Stamp
Wilmington Automotive Inc.
R. H. BO:rkenhagn
Sam Brown
Whiting Campbell
Carolina Glove Co.
Rona.1d Causey
Paul Cauthen
Charisma, Inc.
Polly Compos
Raymond Creech
Martino Dasan
Mary Daum
TeadorGlod
Grover Gore
Glen Greer
Catherine McArthur
Emmer Newkirk
Addie Palmeter
Wilbert Sanders
Julius Segerman
Anthony Sidbury
Singer Co.
Lou Smith
M. Page Taylor Sr., Heirs
Robert Williams
Frank Wilson
$ ,20.01
59.20
125.80
62.26
30.80
10.44
133.72
42.35
132.93
50.28,
. 1,697.78
23.11
18.10
27'.91
$ 926.91
5.16
149.33
7d.14
4.95
23.68
1,741.76
135.75
1.49
7.10
58.00
64.50
177.07
23.09
43.35
118.74
155.4l
81. 43
16.37
34.39
439.74
167.60
9.46
25.80
1. 08
(Refund)
(R.efund)
(Refund)
(Refund)
N. C. District Council of the Assembles of God, Inc.
requests 1981 taxes in the amount of $100.85 be refunded as this
property qualifies for exemption as outlined in G.S.105-282.1(C).
,
..
,
Mr .G.~F:elixCoQper
,;>ag:e. 3
December 14; 1981
/''',..
"
;f;
.-t, ,.,
'< .,'
Request these items be placed on the consent agenda for the
Count~ Co~missioners' meeting on December 21, 1981; I recommend
approval of these abatements as the Commissioners have approv~d these
types of releases in the past.
LJP/pbc
"
Copy: vMrs. Alyce B. Rusmisell
Mr. Robert Pope
, I
I
strat
December 10,1981
2:30 P.M.; local time
Co. Mgr. Off., County Admin
Building, Wilmington, N C
Date:
Time:
Place
AND TREATMENT SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA
WATER SUPPLY WELL
FLEMINGTON AREA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
or.
i
i
t
~
,~
~
c;..
~
BID TABULATION
.
BIDDER LICENSE NO. BID BOND GENERAL CONTRACT WELL CONTRACT REMARKS
Skipper~s Well Drilling 231 5% ~n Rid $14 qq" 'in
t.Jil mi no ton N. C
Poquoson Construction Co. 5% $ 92 285.50 110 Bi d Apparent Low Bidder
Huntersville. N. C. ^ 1 "on ,rnc.t ..
East Coast Construction Co. . ,
Jacksonville NC 7102 5% $101 286 00 $20,900.00
Jere LeG~in Construction Co. $103.700.80
14ilminqton, N. C. 6553 5% $16.000.00
Pleasant~ Inc. . . $11 655.00 *Bills vJe11 Drilling
fa.vettevi,lle. N. C. 6010 5% $120 679.95 Fay'ville NC A.ooarent
Low Bidder Well Contract
...
....... .
, I
true and
s proj ect
CERTIFICATION: I certify this to be a
correct tabulation of bids taken on thi
to the best of my knowe1dge and belief
&#~
NC
OESEN AND ASSOCIATES,
Engineers & Planners
North Caro I i na
HENRY VON
Consulting
\'1 m i ngton
.' ~'""'....",- ""~",,,,,,",,,<""''''''''''''''''.'''''''''-''.'~'' -~_.~"., ...... -^._"..~".~.....
....
TA B U L A T I 0 N 0 F
-
FOR ,
\VATER SUppLy € TQEATHE
I
-FLEH II'JGJTON AREA
I'J t:. \V l-lANOYE.R co., .l--J. CAR
JE~E LEG,\VI N ',~ p[
ITEM IT E M ESTIMATED I CO~ST l
NO QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT, UN'lT
PRICE PRICE
lA" ~" 0.1. MAIN 1,735 L,-F Q80 12,~
'.1 e" C;" PVC HAl tJ 1,735 Lf 5:.45 """,507. t30 8.~
Q.50700
2. G:," VALvE5 4- EA, ~.QO~ I" G,OO,OO C;OO.~
3. \VELL SITE:: COMP LUH~ 5Utvl 24 000.00
I
4, Tr:(E.AT pLA NT t3 L o~ LUMP SUH ZG, 108.00
I
5. CAUST -FEED. COMQ LUHp SUH 2pOO.OO
G. cl...\Lo~, 5YSTEH LUHP su~ . 400000
. h .
7. \VATER LE VE. L CONT LUHp SUH 3,000. 00
B.A 1,500 ~. P~ESS TAN 1"\ 7000.00
I. ,
8B 5000 Gj. Pt:?ESS. TAN '" 1'2;oao~oo
'"
'.
. a.c... J500 G... QQE5S.]AN K 14- 00000 ._....w......,