1993-09-20 Work Session
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 712
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners held a Work
Session on Monday, September 20, 1993, at 1:00 P.M. in Room 501 of
the New Hanover County Administration Building, 320 Chestnut
Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioners Sandra Barone; WilliamA.
Caster; William E. Sisson, Jr.; vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr.;
Chairman Robert G. Greer; Assistant County Manager, Dave Weaver;
and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F. Harrell
Chairman Greer called the Work Session to order and stated the
purpose of the meeting is to discuss revisions of Land Use Plan
after public comments received on September 7, 1993.
Planning Director, Dexter Hayes, presented a revised Land Use
Plan and reviewed Pages 1 through 74 reflecting the changes
incorporated in the Land Use Plan after the Public Hearing.
Commissioner
1 . 1 ( 9 ) on Page 4
accomplished?
Barone expressed
and inquired as
concern
to how
for the addition of
this policy can be
Planning Director Hayes explained that current regulations
require 75 feet setbacks from estuarine areas and drainage must be
handled through swales, not piped or di tched to the waterway;
however, the ordinance does not address private or public funded
projects. Section 1.1(9) will require all private or public funded
projects to be constructed in a manner that will minimize a
negative impact on estuarine areas. For example, road building
projects often do not comply to restrictive stormwater management
requirements with siltation and pollution runoff from publicly
funded projects.
vice-Chairman Mathews commented on 1.2(7) on Page 11
pertaining to floating homes and asked if any problems have been
experienced with floating homes in the County?
Planning Director Hayes reported several years ago problems
were experienced with floating homes; however, text amendments were
incorporated into the Zoning Ordinance which has resolved most of
these problems. The proposed revision listed under 1.2(7) will
prohibit floating home development which will protect the public
trust and estuarine waters.
Chairman Greer commented on Section 11 on Page 15 and inquired
as to why Class IV Standards were deleted in the use of private
package treatment plants, and will this section, if approved, close
all private package treatment systems in the County?
Planning Director Hayes reported Class IV Standards are used
for large volume package treatment plants with the requirement that
an operator be on duty to ensure the system is properly
functioning. Private package treatment plants throughout the
County do not have operators; therefore, the only way the County
becomes aware of a malfunctioning plant is through notification
from a citizen who sees waste floating down a creek. The proposed
revision will allow the County to support only package treatment
plants of the highest quality.
Assistant Planning Director, Patrick Lowe, commented on
discussion of this matter by the joint Planning Boards and
explained that Class IV Standards do not guarantee the highest
safety standards; therefore, it was agreed to use compromise
language that could fit the situation and not involve a full time
operator. The systems would be gradually phased out and hopefully
new package treatment plants will have state-of-the-art equipment.
Presently, there is a malfunctioning system at the convenience
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 713
store next to the Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge, which lS a new
system.
Chairman Greer expressed concern for the following language:
"phasing out and eliminating the use of private package treatment
plants that do not meet the most stringent State requirements
feasible to ensure the protection of our estuarine waters" and he
inquired as to what will happen to this company's investment?
Planning Director Hayes reported private utility companies
would be given time to recover their investments before phasing out
a system. With continued growth and the lack of sewer throughout
the County, more pressure will be applied to allow these types of
package treatment systems to be placed in the County. Emphasis was
placed on the need to strictly regulate these type of package
treatment systems until the County sewer system is completed.
Commissioner Sisson commented on the mineral resource
policies that do not address the issue of water extraction and
referred to the present controversy in Pender County with Martin-
Marietta. New Hanover County does have areas where the water table
is suspect with Porters Neck being one of these areas; therefore,
some verbiage should be added to the plan under the Mineral
Resources Policy.
Planning Director Hayes recommended adding verbiage about
groundwater extraction in policies dealing with aquifer and
groundwater. It was agreed to request the Planning Director to
add the additional language.
Discussion was held on Section 2, Page 29. Commissioner
Sisson recommended inserting a section that will request the State
to explore the potential for amending State Law, if necessary, to
allow transfers of development rights to occur. It was agreed to
include this additional verbiage.
Emphasis was placed on the importance of Section 3.0(6), Page
35, and the need for the City and County to coordinate efforts to
develop regulations through interlocal agreements ln order to
provide for a more orderly growth.
Discussion held on Section 7, Page 37, which will allow
establishment of commercial nodes as viable means of preventing
encroachments into established or future neighborhoods as well as
limit strip commercial zoning of major thoroughfares.
vice-Chairman Mathews commented on Section 12,
agreed with development of service/ frontage roads
thoroughfares.
Page 39, and
along maj or
Commissioner Caster expressed concern for Section 13, Page 39,
and inquired as to why it is unacceptable to build along a
commercial thoroughfare, such as College Road?
Planning Director Hayes reported the N. C. Department of
Transportation is opposed to the service/frontage roads concept
because it increases additional rights-of-way and maintenance
responsibilities. Also, Highway 132 was constructed with public
funds to provide a thoroughfare for better movement of traffic and
materials through New Hanover County. When development occurred on
College Road with an unlimited number of curb cuts, the original
purpose of the road was negated. Also, the cost of providing
services (water and sewer) is much more costly on a linear foot.
Discussion was held on Section 3.1(2), Page 40, encouraging
housing opportunities for citizens of all economic status to
include the elderly, physically and mentally challenged, single
parent households, and the area's homeless population.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 714
Commissioner Caster inquired as to why this section lS
included in a planning document?
Planning Director Hayes reported the State of North Carolina
enacted legislation that allows group housing quarters in
neighborhoods; therefore, this section was added to re-enforce the
State's policy. Emphasis was placed on the increase in single
parent households in New Hanover County and the need to address
this sector of the population.
Discussion was held on the new policies listed on Page 53 of
the plan pertaining to encouraging the location of industries that
will promote on-going education programs in marine sciences and
will be compatible with the area's ecosystem. The City and County
should encourage the location of diversified industries through the
provision of an adequately trained employee pool with new
industrial activities being located within existing industrial
corridors. The tourism industry shall be considered in the
recruitment and location of industrial firms. Industries that may
pose a threat to the built or natural environment shall not be
located in proximity to residential development or to established
tourism attractions such as the historic core of the City of
Wilmington. The operation and placement of oil refinery operations
shall be prohibited in close proximity to established residential
and historic resources or in such locations that may result in the
potential for significant impact on the area's environmental
resources.
Discussion was held on Section 6, Page 55 referencing support
of planned growth of the N. C. State Ports Authority. Commissioner
Sisson expressed concern for the County not initiating more support
of the Port, which is vital to the economy of the State and
Southeastern North Carolina.
Discussion of held on Section 3.4(8) Page 59, which addresses
some concerns of the SOLO group by prohibiting new or enlarged
through highways in areas classified as resource protection or
conservation without a comprehensive environmental assessment of
the proposed route.
Discussion was held on Section 3.7(5), Page 65, the use of
off-premise signs. Commissioner Caster inquired as to whether
wording can be incorporated into the policy to avoid installation
of signs that block the view on land and in the waterways. After
further discussion of public safety, the Planning Director was
requested to add additional verbiage.
Discussion was held on Section 5.0(4), Page 71, pertaining to
the event of a hurricane. Vice-Chairman Mathews recommended using
"any natural disaster" in the document instead of referring to
hurricanes only. It was agreed to change the verbiage to include
any natural disaster.
Vice-Chairman Mathews expressed appreciation to the Planning
Staff for the excellent format and the effort given in developing
the revised Land Use Plan.
Chairman Greer commented on the Joint City/County Work Session
scheduled for September 28, 1993, and recommended not holding the
Work Session until comments have been received from the groups that
requested the 30-day extension. Emphasis was placed on the
importance of adopting a Land Use Plan that is workable and will
serve all interests of the County.
Commissioner Sisson reported the public has spoken and their
needs are well documented. Bill Cameron, Dan Dawson, Terry Bache
and others were aware of the Public Hearings held and could have
presented their concerns during those meetings. He strongly
objected to the delay in adoption of the Land Use Plan.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 715
vice-Chairman Mathews commented on the schedule adopted at the
September 7, 1993, meeting and suggested complying to the November
deadline. Concern was expressed for the Coastal Resources
Commission adopting the plan as submitted if the County
Commissioners do not adopt a plan by November.
Consensus: After a lengthy discussion on the 30-day delay, it was
the consensus of the Board to take the following action:
-Hold Joint City/County Work Session on September 28, 1993, at
5:30 P.M. in the City Council Chamber to discuss the Airport
Burn pit Site Clean-up, if necessary.
-Hold the City/County Public Hearing on October 11, 1993, at
7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers as scheduled to hear
comments from the industrial and trade groups who requested
the 30-day delay. Authorize the Chairman to write a letter to
these groups to submit written comments before the October 11
Public Hearing with those comments being presented at the
Public Hearing that evening. After the Public Hearing is
closed, the City and County can decide on the dates for
additional Work Sessions, if necessary.
-Adopt the plan the last week in November.
Chairman Greer, on behalf of the Board, expressed appreciation
to the Planning Staff for the time and effort given in preparing
the revised Land Use Plan.
Chairman Greer expressed concern for a letter received from
the N. C. Department of Human Resources and inquired as to why the
Assistant Planning Director, Patrick Lowe, called this office and
informed them of the 30-day delay when the date for adoption of the
plan is still pending?
Assistant Planning Director, Patrick Lowe, reported the
previous schedule for adoption of the plan in October had already
been forwarded to John Crews, with the N. C. Department of Human
Resources; therefore, the plan would have been adopted before the
Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) meeting scheduled in November.
The purpose of the call was to inform them of the delay in order to
see if the 30-day extension would create a problem.
Discussion of Terms for Newly Elected Trustees to New Hanover
Regional Medical Center
Chairman Greer reported on meeting with Attorney Dumay Gorham,
representing New Hanover Regional Medical Center, relative to a
request from the Hospital Board of Trustees for implementation of
an appointment schedule to comply with three year terms. The
proposed plan would appoint four members for 3 -year terms and
gradually increase the membership to 20 Trustees at which time the
membership would begin to decrease and return to 15 members. At
the meeting this morning, the Commissioners appointed two members
to serve 2-year terms with one member serving a 3-year term which
would stagger the terms and allow the membership to remain at 15.
He requested direction from the Board.
Commissioner Sisson recommended allowing the appointments to
remain unchanged as voted upon at the regular meeting this morning.
He expressed concern for this being a problem to the Hospital Board
of Trustees and stated, in his opinion, this type of decision
should be made by the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Caster reported on seeing the implementation
plan, but stated he was not aware the plan had been written into
the Hospital By-Laws.
Consensus: After discussion of the By-Laws already being amended,
it was the consensus of the Board to decide on the terms of office
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 716
for the newly elected Trustees at the meeting scheduled for October
4, 1993.
BUDGET WORK SESSION ON METHODICAL REVIEW OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Assistant County Manager, Dave Weaver, reported the following
topics will be discussed:
Who lS New Hanover County?
How lS New Hanover County Government made up?
What direction should future workshops take?
Presentation of Statistical Data on New Hanover County Family
Staff Planner I, Chris O'Keefe, and Planner I, Wanda Coston,
presented relevant statistics on housing, household composition,
ancestry; commuting time for workers; employment, income,
education, and age groups in New Hanover County. Population
figures were presented reflecting growth from 1970 until 2010.
Emphasis was placed on the fact that the population figures
projected for revising the Land Use Plan were underestimated. The
figure projected for 1992 was 124,000 with an actual increase of
128,000. The rate of growth has been at 3.7%, and if this growth
continues, the population by the year 2000 will be 170,000.
Figures were presented on the median age from 1970, at 27.6, to
37.3 by the year 2000. The housing units have increased from
31,475 in 1970 to 67,535 by the year 2000. Aid to Families to
Dependent Children has doubled since 1987 until July 1993. Other
figures were presented on the increase in crime and the school
population.
In summary, New Hanover County ranked 11th among the most
populous counties in the State and the third highest in retail
sales. The County also ranked 18th among 23 counties with net
migration rates of 10% or greater. The 2.5% population growth for
1991 and 3.7% for 1992 are the highest annual growth rates for the
County since 1980. The labor force has grown by an average of 2.2%
per year in the past five years; however, in 1991, the number of
unemployed people reached its highest level since 1984. Emphasis
was placed on the need to prepare and plan for the present and
future growth in order to meet demands on County services.
Overview of County Government
Budget Director, Cam McAbee, presented an organizational chart
of County Government reflecting budget figures for each department.
A chart of expenditures and general government revenues was
presented for the past ten years.
Discussion was held on the manner ln which information is
presented during the budgetary process. Commissioner Sisson
requested that figures be presented to show exactly how much money
is being allocated to each department or agency, such as the DSS or
the schools.
Chairman Greer expressed difficulty in understanding revenues
and expenditures for the various departments and the manner in
which figures are presented. For example, with the DSS Budget, at
one place it appears that the County's contribution is $27 million
and in another place it appears that the County's contribution is
$9 million.
After further discussion, it was agreed to request figures
that will show the direct relationship between the different County
funds and various major transfers that are moved from one fund to
the other.
Commissioner Sisson reported on the Southeastern Center's
budget where monies must pass through the Center in order for
various agencies, such as the Thomas S or Willie M programs, to
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 717
receive funds. When reviewing the budget for the Center, these
funds have to appear in the budget, but do not relate to the costs
involved with operation of the Southeastern Center. He recommended
preparing a separate section for pass through funds when presenting
budget figures in order to clarify actual dollars for an agency of
this type.
After further discussion, it was agreed that a separate
section should be prepared showing funds received and passed
through to other agencies when presenting department budgets.
The following major budget issues were presented:
Education: Nearly 26% of the County's expenditures (excluding
enterprise funds) are for education. This figure continues to
grow, and if the voters approve the $53 million bond issue the tax
rate will increase by six cents over the next several years. If
the bond issue fails, the County will then have to decide how to
fund the needs of the schools and Cape Fear Community College.
Also, if the State continues to pass down more school items to be
locally funded, this matter will have to be addressed.
Consolidation: It appears the atmosphere for consolidating various
Ci ty and County Departments is more favorable. The following
departments are ideal candidates for consolidation or merger: (1)
Law Enforcement; (2) Parks/Recreation; (3) Planning; (4) Management
Information Services; and (5) Purchasing. As to an immediate
savings from the consolidation or merger of various departments, it
would not be noticed on a short-term basis but should become cost
effective on a long-term basis.
Fire Service: The Special Fire Service District was established in
1986 to provide funds to volunteer fire department in the
unincorporated areas of the County. The Commissioners established
a Board of Fire Commissioners to assist and advise them on fire-
related matters, including but not limited to departmental budgets,
changes in fire legislation, and recommendations relative to the
annual contracts between the volunteer fire departments and the
County. The Fire District property tax rate for property owners
within the service district is 2.5 cents for FY 1993-94. The
Department of Emergency Management serves as the staff liaison to
the Board of Fire Commissioners. As the County becomes more
urbanized and the training requirements for volunteer fire fighters
becomes more complex, some changes may have to be considered in
providing fire protection services. The following options were
presented: (1) a paid full-time fire service; (2) contract with
the City of Wilmington for fire protection; (3) contract with a
private provider for fire protection; (4) a mix of paid and
volunteer firefighters; and (5) continue with all volunteer
firefighters.
Environmental Management: Future funding for solid waste disposal
is a rnaj or issue facing the County. Al though the County has
tradi tionally relied primarily on the tip fee to pay the large
capital costs for WASTEC and the Landfill, there is concern for the
high tip fee at $60 per ton. The fee would be higher if the
operation was not subsidized by $2.5 million from unobligated sales
tax revenues and General Fund transfers. The tip fee will not
decrease over the next several years because of the high debt
service cost which is now more than $4 million per year. If the tip
fee remains high, there could be a problem with controlling the
solid waste flow in the County. A low tip fee of $20 to $30 per
ton would be the most effective way to keep solid waste in the
County.
Other environmental issues are cleaning up the Airport Burn
pit Site and the Flemington Landfill Clean-up. The Board is aware
of the situation with the Burn pit; however, the County (along with
seven other defendants) is now facing action by EPA to recover
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 718
$400,000 in EPA costs for investigation into potential pollution
caused by the closed Flemington Landfill. The County's share would
be approximately $80,000. Future EPA and State monitoring costs
will be incurred.
Water & Sewer District: The Water & Sewer District has reached a
critical point in its growth due to no revenue sources for future
expansion of the system. Also, additional funds will be needed if
the County decides to aggressively expand water service to areas
beyond the service areas recently purchased by the County.
Assistant County Manager, Dave Weaver, reported the data has
finally been received from the former consulting engineer and the
Sewer Task Force will begin to meet and become more active in
preparing the next sewer study.
Capital Projects: In FY 1992-93, funds in the amount of $200,000
were budgeted for future Capital Projects. In FY 1993-94, no funds
were budgeted for Capital Projects, but the following requests were
presented for consideration at a later date:
Parks: Plans to utilize bond funds for parks acquisition and
development. Emphasis is now being placed on planning for
acquired park areas. Plans for the downtown park are now
being finalized by a citizens committee. The funding goal has
been reached by solicitation of private contributions.
Aging: The Department of Aging is requesting funding to
expand the parking area at the new Senior Center by 103 spaces
for storage of miscellaneous equipment. The Department is
also requesting a 40' x 20' enclosed heated pool.
Emergency Medical Services: A substation in the Empie Park
area would provide separate quarters for the EMS staff
currently housed at the Empie Park City of Wilmington Fire
Station.
Cooperative Extension Service: The Cooperative Extension
Service is requesting funding to refurbish the exterior of the
building and construct rest room facilities with handicap
access for Arboretum guests and visitors.
Health Department/Vector Control: Funding is being requested
to replace the current Vector Control trailer with a 1,000
square foot addition to the Vector Control Lab.
Library: The Library is requesting construction of a
northeast branch library to serve the citizens in that area.
It would be located on a recently purchased site, consist of
a 12,000 square foot building, and provide parking spaces for
75 vehicles. This would replace the Plaza East Branch
Library. They also wish to hire an architect to develop a
master plan for the future expansion of the Main Library.
Department of Social Services: The Department of Social
Services is requesting funding to expand its current facility
due to non-compliance to federal guidelines.
Expansion of Office Space for County Employees and
Improvements to the Annex Building: The space needs for
County employees and improvements to the Annex Building are
needs that will have to be addressed in the not too distant
future.
Implementation of a County-wide Communications System: This
project has already begun with the construction of the Radio
Tower.
Expansion of Jail and Judicial Facilities:
The jail
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 719
facilities are already overcrowded, and as the State adds
programs, additional office space, by State Statute, will have
to be provided in the Judicial Building.
Assistant County Manager Weaver announced this concludes the
presentation and requested the Board to decide on whether the
budget review should follow a detailed departmental analysis or be
based on the functions provided by County government with the
overall picture of the resources necessary to provide these
functions.
Chairman Greer expressed concern for continually increasing
funding for departments, such as WASTEC, where funds are budgeted
in a fiscal year for capital expenditures but are used for another
purpose. During the next fiscal year, funds will be allocated
again for the purchase of the equipment which increases the
department's budget by that amount. A perfect example of this
situation was approval of a $3 million Special Obligation Bond
Issue for WASTEC to purchase equipment that was budgeted last year,
but spent on other items. He strongly objected to continuing this
practice, which increases the department's budget and the County's
debt service.
Commissioner Sisson stated, in his opinion, the County is
paying for past neglect of WASTEC; however, with the improvements
in maintenance and personnel, the cost of operation and
expenditures can be better controlled. He recommended that debt
service be broken down by departments.
It was agreed that a breakdown of debt serVlce as applicable
to each department would be beneficial.
Assistant County Manager Weaver reported $1.3 million was
budgeted for the landfill cell expansion and closure; however,
funds were used for needed improvements to the Waste-to-Energy
Facili ty and for the shortfall experienced from the loss of
electric revenues due to an error by Carolina Power & Light
Company. With completion of the expanded facility, implementation
of the Preventative Maintenance Plan, and additional qualified
staff, the budget process and forecast for WASTEC should greatly
improve with more accurate projections of revenues and
expenditures.
Chairman Greer requested Board approval of any maj or purchases
or change in line items. He also expressed concern for obligated
general fund monies being transferred over from one budget year to
the next budget year and requested designating these funds as a
designated part of the fund balance. For example, if the Health
Department budgeted $300,000 for the purchase of a computer system
in FY 1993-94 and these funds were not expended during that fiscal
year, there should be a way to know that the $300,000 is still
pending before purchasing some other item.
Budget Director McAbee reported these funds are rolled over as
unencumbered with the designated items purchased during the next
fiscal year.
After further discussion, Chairman Greer requested the Board
to decide if a line item review or function approach should be used
ln the FY 1994-95 budgetary process.
Consensus: After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board to
direct staff to perform a functional review.
Commissioner Barone expressed concern for the following items
and requested the Commissioners to consider review of these
recommendations during the budgetary process:
Travel Policy:
Only one person should attend meetings with
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
BOOK 23
PAGE 720
any pertinent data brought back to other interested employees.
There is no reason to allow four or five persons from a
department to attend the same meeting.
Accountability for Personal Telephone Calls: There should be
some accountability for personal telephone calls. If
employees are making personal phone calls, they should pay for
the cost of the call plus a 20% administration fee because of
the time taken from company business to conduct personal
business. This fee would discourage personal calls.
Supplies: Investigate the manner ln which the County
purchases supplies.
Training: Mandatory training is fine, but voluntary training
is not necessary during the downsizing of government.
Discussion was held on the length of the proposed Budget Work
Sessions. Commissioners Caster and Sisson requested adhering to a
time schedule in order to plan time away from work.
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to hold the next
Budget Work Session on Thursday, September 30, 1993, after the
staff meeting from 10:00 A.M. until 11:00 A.M. with two functions
being presented.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Commissioner Caster MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Sisson
to adjourn. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Greer adjourned the continued meeting and Work
Session at 5:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lucie F. Harrell
Clerk to the Board
.
.
.
~
MrNUTES OF CONTINUED MEETING AND WORK SESSIONS
ON LAND USE PLAN AND BUDGET REVIEW, SEPTEMBER 20" 1993
PAGE 720
any pertinent data brought back to other interested employees.
There is no reason to allow four or five persons from a
department to attend the same meeting.
Accountability for Personal Telephone Calls: There should be
some accountability for personal telephone calls. If
employees are making personal phone calls, they should pay for
the cost of the call plus a 20% administration fee because of
the time taken from company business to conduct personal
business. This fee would discourage personal calls.
Supplies: Investigate the manner in which the Co~nty
purchases supplies.
Training: Mandatory training is fine, but voluntary training
is not necessary during the downsizing of government.
Discussion was held on the length of the proposed Budget Work
Sessions. Commissioners Caster and Sisson requested adhering to a
time schedule in order to plan time away from work.
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to hold the next
Budget Work Session on Thursday, September 30, 1993, after the
staff meeting from 10:00 A.M. until 11:00 A.M. with two functions
being presented.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Commissioner Caster ~OVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Sisson
to adjourn. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Greer adjourned the continued meeting and Work
Session at 5:20 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
~y::~
Clerk to the Board
~