The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 2001 11-05.~ . AGENDA ~~~ppOYER CO y~ G ~ ;. ~ . * ~* urn , Q N~~~ IMPO/E%P/ O~ IN OUSTRT ~ . " ~~NORTNcp NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Assembly Room, New Hanover ;County Historic Courthouse 24 North .Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC TED DAVIS, JR., CHAIRMAN • ROBERT G. GREERVKE-CHAIRMAN WILLIAM A. CASTER, COMMISSIONER • JULIA BOSEMAN, COMMISSIONER • NANCY PRITCHETT. COMMISSIONER ALLEN O'NEAL, COUNTY MANAGER • WANDA COPLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY • LUCIE F. HARRELL, CLERK TO THE BOARD November 5, 2001. 5:30 p.m. . MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman Ted Davis, Jr.) INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAN CE APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ESTIMATED ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE TIMES NO. 5:45 p.m. 1. Presentation of Special Award to Chandler McHenry 1 5:50 p.m. 2. Presentation of Keep America Beautifiil TV Campaign for NHCTV 3 6:00 p.m. 3. ° Presentation of NCDENR on Grants for Veterans .Park ~ 5 6:10 p.m. ` 4. Update on Wilmington International Airport 9 ~. 620 p.m. 5. Consideration of Ordinance Requiring Traffic Impact Studies ':. 13 ~ ~! Public Hearin6s: 6:30 p.m. 6.1 Specia] Use Permit: For a Single Wide Mobile Home Located at 1812 Oakley Road 19 5-480, 11/O1 6:40' p:m. 6.2 Rezoning: K.E. Austin Corporation Request R-15 to B-2 Highway Business; 0.13. 25 Acres Located at 5556 Carolina Beach Road Z-730, 10/01 6;50 p.m. 6.3 Public Hearing: Consideration. of Support for Designation of Futch Creek as an 29 Outstanding Water Resource 7:00 p.m. 7. Consideration of Acceptance of Gordon Road Lake anal Property from NCDOT 41 7:15 p~.m. 8. Consideration of Approval of Draft Conditional. Permit for the Mason Inlet 47 ' Relocation Project 7:30 p.m. 9. Consideration of Wheels to Work Program for Donation of Selected Surplus 63 Vehicles 7:45 p.m. , 10. Meeting of the Water and Sewer District ~ ~ 1 7:'50 p.m. 11. Public Health Surveillance of Bio-Terrorism 69 -8:10 p.m. Non-agenda items~(limit 3 minutes) X8:30 p.m. Adjourn Closed Session to Discuss a Property Matter Pursuant to NCGS 143-318.11(a)(5). Note: Times listed for each i tem is estimated; .and in the event that a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agen da is completed. MEETING OF THE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT ASSEMBLY ROOM, NEW HANOVER COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE 24 NORTH THIRD STREET, ROOM 301 WILMINGTON, NC November 5,..2001 ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE NO. 1. Non-Agenda Items (limit to 3 minutes) ~ 71 2. Approval of Minutes 73. Adjourn ' CONSENT AGENDA NEW IIANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS November 5, 2001 ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE NO. 1. Approval of Minates ~ 77 2. Approval of State Senior Center General Purpose Funds for Department of Aging 79 in the Amount of $11,364 and approval of Associated Budget Amendment #02- 0073 3: Approval of Payment of $24,500 to Town of Kure Beach for Beach Grass Planting 81 4. Acceptance of Two (2) FEMA Fire Act Funding Awards to New Hanover County 85 Departments of Fire Services and Approval of BA #02-0071 5. Approval of the Appointment of Edward Ruffin to the Region O Regional Aging ~ 91 Advisory Council 6. Approval of Deaccession of Three Objects, Disposal of One Object 93 7. Approval of Proposed Budget for Grassroots Science Grant 103 8. Approval of Snows Cut Park Lease 107 -Approval of Budget Amendments: 9.1 #02-0074 Public Health/Child Care Health Consultant 109 9.2 #02-0075 Public Health/Teen Aids Prevention 110 9.3 #02-0076 Public Health/Maternal Outreach Worker 111 • 1 NEB HANO1lER C®IJNTY BOAR® OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION! Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Regular Item #: 1 Estimated Time: Page Number: , Department: Fire-Services Presenter: Wayne Burns Contact:. Wayne Burns SUBJECT: Presentation of Special Award to 8 Year Old, Chandler Mcl-I~nry BRIEF SUMMARY: Chandler McHenry contacted 911 to notify that his neighbor's house was on fire. He was the first person to notice the fire. There was no one home at the residence so he told the neighbors on both sides of the fire. His quick thinking allowed a faster response by the fire department. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Presentation of certificate of appreciation by the Fire Marshall and also one by Ogden VFD. , FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ,~ REVIEWED BY; LEGAL FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A 4 ~Ot3~TY CO~~ISSt~N'~RS- r . rry ~ . [~(~ ~~/ 1 ,~~1~D "~E j l o {This page intentionally left blank} .r,- ~+vJ{~~G~(!"~~. ,.y~ •, Imo/ 1, eL.,~ y TJ ~'*~ '~6 jsw: 1 1! !` .. 1 ` i ' NE~l1 HAN®VER C®UiVTY B®ARD OF C0M9VIISSI0IVERS REQUEST,FOR BOAR® ACTION Meeting Dater 11/05/01 Regular Item #: 2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department:.. Environmental Management Presenter: Molly Connell , Contact: Molly Connell SUBJECT: Keep ;4merica Beautiful Spot BRIEF SUMMARY: KAB's new "spokes-critter against litter" would like to make an appearance at the Board of Commissioners meeting to remind everyone that little trash becomes big trash. This new television campaign is being aired on NHCTV and all local commercial television stations. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Hear presentation .FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED 8Y: LEGAL: FINANCE: N/A BUDGET: HUMAN RESOURCES: - Hear presentation and view video. No action required COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: . .~4UN1Y COMNIiSSI©NERS APPROVED p DEJECTED p - REMOVED (~ POSTPONED~~ HEARD. ®ATE ~' 0 ~~.-~ {This page intentionally left blank} ~~, i~ ~~~_ ~ ~, Y ~d t• i~~~ ~~ ~ (~_ ~ ~ ~~ @. ~ ~ ~~. "~ a IVEV1/ HAN®VER C®UNTV ~®A~® OF COMIVIISSI®tVERS REQUESZ F®R BOARD ACTION. Meeting Date.: 11/®5/01 Regular Item #: 3 Estimated Time: Page Number: + Department: Parks Presenter: Mr. John Poole, NCDENR Contact: Neal. Lewis SUBJECT: L1NC'F Grant and°PARTF Grant f®r Veterans Park BRIEF SUMMARY: Mr. John Poole, Grants Coordinator for NCDENR, will make a presentation to the Board of County . Commissioners regarding the approval of $500,000 LWCF Matching Grant and $250,000 PARTF .Matching Grant for~Veterans Park RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• "N /A FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: N/A ITEM DOES IVOi' REQUIRE REVIEW - ~ COUNTY MANAGER'S_COMMENTS A1VD RE MENDATIONS: Hear presentation. No action require , nr~nn nn~rr~nw~rr~ri e~Tens... i.~i.www,. ....... - • ~f9Ui~TY OOMMiSS1©NER APPROVED ;p REJECTED p REMOVED POSTPa ' p ~ H rtD ATE .._'~_'~s~o! w M s' Veterans Park Grants Summary November 5, 2001 New Hanover County has been awarded two grants for the development of Veterans Park: Details of the grants are as follows: • North Carolina Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTP): This is a matching grant of $250,000, requiring adollar-for-dollar match by the County. The grant is awarded by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. .This grant is awarded based on a competitive application process. The amount awarded is the maximum amount available under this grant program. • Land and Water Conservation .Fund (LWCI+): This is a matching grant of $500,000, requiring adollar-for-dollar match by the County. The grant is funded by the federal government, based on the recommendation of the North Caro ina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. This grant is awarded based on a competitive application process. The amount awarded is the maximum amount available under this grant program. Together, these grants will provide $750,000, for the development of public outdoor recreation facilities at VeterarLS Park. Combuzed with approximately $1,100,000, available in the Capital Account for the park, the total budget for this phase of the work is $1,845,000. A budget and a description of the work to be completed during this phase of park development is attached. Upon completion of this work, the cost estimate to complete the remainder of the work at the park is $1;750,000, based on the architect's original estimate. This would include all development on the western side of the park and lighting systems for the soccer and so$ball fields. The PARTF grant has been awarded and the funds have been received by the County. The LWCF Grant is approved upon the signature of the Chairman of the Board of County, Commissioners on the grant agreement. This is a reimbursement grant, meaning that the County will complete the work and seek reimbursement quarterly as the work progresses. The work may begin any time afier October 1, 2001, and has to be completed by October 1, 2004. i_ r ~ ' a.9 . r t~ ._ ~ ' ~'~ ,pq ~~, S~ 0.9 ~'~° .. ~ ~C/~~~ COST ESTIMATES ` VETERANS PARK - PFIASE 3 • • Amenities Sub-Total ~ 5. Contingency 1. Y®uth Baseball Complex 1. Site Work/Landsca@g/Irrigation $ 75,000 ~ 2. Fencing (2,800 LF @ $8.00/LF) ?2,400 3. Lighting (4 @ $75,000) 300,000 • 4. Dugouts (8) (160 SF @ $70.00/SF) 89,600 5. Press Boxes (4) (310 SF @ $125.00/SF) 155,000 6. Small Picnic Shelter (400 SF @ $40.00/SF} 16,000 . 7. Bleachers (8 @ $2,000.00) 16,000 8. Rest Room/ConcessionBullding 235,000 (2,350 SF @ $100.001SF) Youth Baseball Complex Sub-Total $ 909,000 2. Football/Soccer Complex . 1. Site Work/Landscaping/Irrigation ~ 50,000 2. Fencing{2,400 LF @ $8.00/LF) 19,200 3. Bleachers (8 @ $2,000.00) 16,000 4. Gcal Posts (8 @ $2,000.00) 16,000 5. Rest Room/ConcessioriBullding 235,500 (2,350 SF @ $100.00/SF) FootbalUSoccer Complex Sub-Total. 336,700 3. Common Area 1. Small Picnic Shelter (400 SF @ $ 40.00/SF) 16,000 2. Playground Equipment 45;000 3. Fencing (300 LF @ $12.00/LF) ~ ~ 3;600 4. Walkways (40,000 SF @ $ 3.00/SF) - 120;000 . S. Bridge (LS) 80,000 6. Entrance Shelter (540 SF @ $ 100.00/SF) 54,100 7. Site Work/Landscaping/Irrigation 128,000 Common. Area Sub-Total 446700 4. Amenities l .Benches (8@$400.00) 3,200 2. Flagpole, (LS) 3,000 3. Bike Racks (4 @ $400.00). 1,600 4. Drinking Fountains (4 @ $ 500.00) 2,000 5. Trash Receptacles (14 @ $200:00) 2,800 6. Signage (including LWCF signs) ~ ~ 15,000 27,600 125,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 1,845;000 {This page intentionally left blank} NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Regular Item #: 4 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: County Manager Presenter: Jon Rosborough Contact: Andy Atkinson . SUBJECT: Update on Wilmington International Airport BRIEF SUMMARY: As a result of the-911 tragedy many changes have occurred at Wilmington International Airport. The Airport Director, 'Jon Rosborough, will update the Board and the community. Travel guidelines will also be presented. ~ ' RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: " Hear presentation FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACIiMENTS: REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: HUMAN RESOURCES: N!A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND R i~(IENDATIONS: Hear presentation. No action required. COMMlSSlONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENT ~'v, coUNTY e©n~~nlssioN~l~~ APPk~gVED ^ REJ~CTEO Rrr'ti C~1ED ~ ^ . POSTPONED HEARD ®ATE ~ ~ A ~ Airport Authority Carter T. Lambeth Chainr2an Pnrks L. GriFfin Yice-Chr irnian E. L. Mathews, Jr. Secretary John M. Coble I. A. Roseman, D.D.S. Airport Director Jon W. Rosborough October 2, 2001 Dear Business and Community Leaders: ~. ~~ ,, _~~ ~ ~~_ WILMINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1740 Airport Boulevard Wilmington, NoRh Carolina 28405 (9101341-4333 (910)341-4365 Fax web site: http://www.flyilm.cam E-b4ail:. ilm@flyilm.com 1 am piea:;e~ to advise that on September i3, 1UvI the rederai ~:viation Admi.,istratiun (>~AA) deemed the-i'riimington International Airport (ILM) to be in full compliance with all applicable security regulations and re-certified it for commercial airline flight operations. ~ , On that day, the airlines (ASA Delta and US Airways serving our region returned flights to our airport and since that time they have been building back to full schedules. I ~m pleased to advise that as of today, Delta Connection Carrier (ASA) and US Airways are offering eight (8) daily flights to Atlanta and seven (7) daily flights to Charlotte. We are hopeful that Midway Airlines, or a comparable airline, as a result of the Aviation Stabilization Act will be able to return to service at ILM in the near filture. In sum, our air carriers are ready and available to serve your travel needs and Wilmington International Airport is open for business! As you know, there are new security rules and regulations mandated that require adjustments by the traveling public. We have included with this letter a list of the most frequently asked Questions and Answers with regard to the new security regulations. You may want to copy these questions and answers and distribute them to your employees. A key to retaining air service is utilization. Now more than ever, the airlines serving our market need your support. Beginning your travel from your hometown airport can translate into smaller to check-in lines, more convenience, and will ensure that commercial airline service continues to remain available in our region. Moreover, you will find that our airline employees, Public Safety professionals and passenger screening personnel are committed to providing the highest level of safety and security for our customers. These individuals, combined with an increased law enforcement presence by the North Carolina National Guard are here to enforce security regulations and create an environment where our passengers feel safe and rnm~~rt-al,lo T.- v~F,..„~D +r....... ,-+ +- .,~ - - -- . - __ ,,,,, _,- y ,. y ~..r a,u.i.;yvi:a~svi: rttii;vj'vr ~ :,nom yV~:i~ u.il.'ti1vri arlc~ pu.Lro?li:ge. The economic consequences of September 11's tragedy on the aviation industry are truly grave. The entire airline industry is facing the most troubling time in its history and no airline or region will be spared the repercussions. Air transportation is vital to our economy and the livelihoods of a number of people that are linked to this industry. We need your ongoing support of the Wilmington International Airport and the aviation industry. Thank you for your support. Sincerely yoursY_-~ f , i v -, ~~:~ _ Jon . Rosborough (r------~'' t ~,.~. Airport Director JWiR%jj':"flyi'lm ~..:,. ~'$' Attachment: ~rport Authority ~Irter T. Lambeth Chairman Paiks L. Griffin Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr. Secretary John M. Coble I. A. Roseman, D.D.S. Airport Director 'Ion ~V. Rosborough ,~;. ~.~. WILMINGTON INTERNATIONAL .AIRPORT ' ~ 1740 Airport Boulevard Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 (910)341-4333 •(910)34.1-4365 Fax Web site: http://www.flyilm.com E-Mail: iim@Oyiim.com Tl~~ ~~,L G~JIflE,~.~nlE~ In accordance. with DOT and FAA regulations, the airport is operating-under a heightened state of security. Following are answers to questions frequently asked by our travelers. With heightened security zneaszares, laow early should I arrive at the airport before my scheduled departure? • One to one and a half hours early. Validation of identification and baggage screening can now .occur at both ticket counters and screening checkpoints causing some delay. 'ill I be able to pull tap to the termizaal to drop off or pick aap passengers? Yes, but you may not leave your vehicle unattended at any time. If you do, your car will be ticketed and towed, and you could be interrogated. ire there new regulations concerzaing carry-on bags? Will they be subject io search? Carry-ons are still being accepted, although regulations governing them could change in the future. These bags will be subject to more scrutiny and a higher level of security check than they used to be. Are there stepped-up screenings of baggage checked at the ticket counters? Yes, checked bags are subject to additional security measures, but the. airport cannot discuss details of those measures. plow often and where willl be asked to-show identification? All passengers 16 and older must have a valid government-issued picture ID, and the ID should have current photo. You should have it with you at all times, because you. may be asked to produce it more than once. In addition to at the ticket counter, you could be asked to present it at the passenger screening checkpoint or at the.boarding gate. 'x''ll I or will my carry-on bags be searched at security checkpoints? There is a~very good chance you and your bags will be searched at security checkpoints. You should expect that. possibility. . // ~> What kinds of items are no longer allowed to be carried onto the airplane? No knives, no scissors, no straight razors,. no nail clippers, no metal nail files or any other personal item of ~rlv c~a that [`n>>l~~ be perce:ve~? aS :: potential vv`:'ap~n. ®nce confiscated, will those items be returned? No, don't expect to see them again. If someone is seeing you off, you can leave the banned items with. that person. If you have time and your car is parked at the airport, you can return the items to your vehicle. But if you surrender them at checkpoint, they will be disposed of. Neither the airlines nor the airport can assume responsibility for holding or returning personal items on such a large scale. Are ticketed passengers the only people allowed on co~zcourses and at gates at Wilmington International? What if I'm seeing off my 8 year-old who's traveling alone to visit Grttndma? Ticketed passengers only will be allowed on the concourses. Check with your airline, regarding their rules on transport of unaccompanied minors/young adults or physically challenged individuals. A parent or an accompanying individual may be cleared, but only with the airline's permission, or unaccompanied minors and physically challenged individuals will be supervised by airline personnel. I made my reservations over the Internet and do not have a paper ticket. What should I dv? Check with. individual airlines to see what their policy is concerning e-tickets at security checkpoints. When in doubt, contact the airline you :are flying for rules and regulations: Airline Phone Internet Delta ~ 800-221-1212 www.delta.com U5Airwa s ~ 800-428-4322 www.usairwa s.com The 1Vew Hanover County Airport Authority, the airlines and the FAA are .committed to providing a safe travel environment. For app-to-date airport information, visit our website at www.flyiltn.com ,~ NEVI HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Item #: 5 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter; DHayes, BAustin Contact: Dexter Hayes, Bill Austin SUBJECT: Consideration of Ordinance Requiring Traffic Impact Studies BRIEF SUMMARY: As the City and County continue to grow and new developments place additional demands on our existing transportation system it is critical that all of our local elected and appointed boards have necessary information with which to make informed decisions regarding traffic impacts. NCGS 153-A-341 provides for zoning regulations to be designed to lessen congestion on the streets and facilitate the adequate provision of transportation. One of the main issues identified in the ~Vilmington/New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan was increasing traffic volumes exceeding the capacity of our street networks: In order to maintain adequate service levels many cities and counties now require that Traffic Impact Studies be completed prior to the approval of any large commercial or residential development; These studies are prepared by qualified transportation engineers hired by the developer and undertaken in cooperation with transportation planners working for the MPO and NCDOT. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Authorize Staff and the Planning Board to proceed with the preparation of an Ordinance requiring Transportation Impact Studies FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: City of Wilmington Requirements ITEM DOES iVOT REQUIRE RE~/IEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Consider authorizing Planning Board and staff to proceed with ordinance preparat n. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: f ~ou~~rr eQM~nISSI01vER~i APPf'CtfE[~ ^ REJ~.~. ~ ,D ^ POSTPONED ^ HERRD ®ATE - _ - .• ~ . City ®f `~ilrnia~~t®n I'~l~ev for Requiriu~ T'raffie Impact Studies anti I~f®r~ati®n Adopted: August 19, 1997 STATEIYIENT OF PiJI2P®SE-As the City of Wilmington and New Hanover County continue to grow at a rapid pace the impact of new development on the transportation system has become a matter of great concern to elected officials, staff, and the public. The purpose of this policy is to establish the transportation impact information required when a new development that requires rezoning, a special use permit, or a major development review is proposed within the City of Wilmington. AI'PLICABIL.ITI'-This policy establishes two levels of analysis and data collection for proposed developments that require either rezonin4, major subdivision review, or a special use permit within the City of Wilmington. The criteria used to determine the level of data collection and analysis required for a proposed development is the peak hour traffic generation that may be expected due to the proposed development. City Staff, the Subdivision Review Board, Technical Review Committee, or City Council may require or waive the requirement for completion of a traffic impact study for any proposed development regardless of size upon review of the proposal. 1viINIli II1~ RE~LJII~EVgE1~1TS-The application.for all proposed developments must include a transportation information sheet completed by the applicant. The information on this sheet includes the Project Name, existing zoning or use, proposed zoning or use, total number of proposed units in the case of residential developments, gross floor area (thousands of square feet) in commercial and industrial developments or the appropriate variable(s) as determined in consultation with City Staff for estimating the trip generation characteristics of the proposed development using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (most recent edition) and an estimate of the AM and PM peak hour driveway (street) traffic to be generated by the proposed development. Any estimates of peak hour traffic not using the most recent ITE Trip Generation Manual must identify the source of the information. The information sheet should also have attached a project location map showing the proposed development and the surrounding area including. major and minor thoroughfares at a scale that adequately identifies possible areas of concern. The applicant should also identify any proposed thoroughfares in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development on the map attached to the information sheet. The location of any improvement to a street or the provision of other transportation services proposed by the applicant should be noted on the information sheet. ~,>[~~ITI~P+1A~, II.IE~IJIPaEME1~°dTS-Those new developments that are anticipated to ge.~erate more than 100 taps during any peak hour period on the surrounding roadways (generally 7:45-8:45 AM and 4:45-5:4~ P141) upon completion of all or a portion of its sections must submit a written traffic impact study prepared by a reputable firm or individual with expertise in traffic engineering or planning. In the case of currently developed property a net increase of 100 peak hour trips will require the conduct of a study. The firm or individual :..~: ~e ~ ~~» "~ •. .. . conducting the study will meet with City Planning and Traffic Engineering.staff to establish the scope of the study. City staff will inform the consultant of the site specific issues that need to be addressed by the study in writing in a timely manner after the scoping meeting. City staff will make available all eadslrirag data on traffic operations in the vicinity of the proposed project upon request by the applicant or his representative. The information the City will provide at no cost to the applicant, will include all existing and appropriate signal timing, facility capacity, and traffic count information in the vicinity of the proposed project. The traffic impact study shall be submitted at least four weeks in advance of the scheduled meeting at which the project will be reviewed by Staff, Committee, Board, Commission or Council and shall at a minimum include: A) Study purpose and objectives: B) Description of site and study area boundaries including appropriate mapping and the rationale for selection of the study area boundaries: C) A summary of existing conditions including but not limited to: surroundmg street and key iritersec[ion traffic volumes, turning movements, and capacities, safety deficiencies and funded transportation improvements: D) Anticipated or approved development in the area; E) Trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and discussion of: -source of trip generation rate including the ITE code used to identify the development trip generation rate and assumptions used or data collected for any variations from generally accepted ITE rates or equations; -passby trip factors and assumptions -internal trip assumptions for mixed use developments -trip distribution and modal split assumptions Projection of future traffic volumes and assessment of future roadway and intersection operating conditions for the year of the ultimate completion of the project. All projections should specifically document projected background traffe as well as the traffic generated by the proposed development. If the project is to be phased; then an assessment of conditions after the completion of each phase of the development is required. If the unphased buildout. period of the project is greater than nine years, then a minimum of one intermediate and one foil buildout impact assessment is required. All assessments should include the following three scenarios: -no build /S -maximum possible development under existing use or zoning; for assessment of project phases the cumulative development of the portion(s) of the property to be built out during phasing is to be assessed; the impact of the development of a phase is not.to be compared with the total possible build out of the entire project location -proposed development G) Recommendations for site access and transportation improvements or mitigation measures needed to maintain traffic flow to, from, within and adjacent to the proposed development at an acceptable and safe level of service (generally assumed at LOS D). Any recommendations for travel demand measures, extension of public transportation or roadway improvements should identify funding sources for these improvements I-1) Data collected for the study will be made available to City staff for evaluation of the study conclusions. The format for data submission as well as the format for data to be provided by the City will be determined in conjunction with City staff at the study scoping meeting. 16 ' , Required Transportation Information Sheet Section One Project Name ' Total Project Acreage . Project Location (Please attach site map) .- Existing Zoning Proposed' Zoning (If different from existing zoning) Section Two* A) Existing Use(s) ~ (If applicable) Institute of Transportation Engineers. Code(s) Independent Variable(s) (Total Number of dwelling units, gross leasable area, etc. for all project phases) Estimated Total Driveway (Road) Peak Hour Trip Generation AM pN B) Proposed Use(s) Institute of Transportation Engineers Code(s) Independent. Variable(s) (Total Number of dwelling units, gross leasable area, etc, for all project phases) Estimated Total Driveway (Road) Pea's Hour Trip Generation Ai°v1 p~ *City Staff will assist in the preparation of this section if needed. /7 This page intentianally left blank} ib ~VEVV HANOVER COUNTY BOAR® OF COMNIISS~ONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD~ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Regular Item #: 6.1 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes . Contact: Sam Burgess SUBJECT: S-48®, 11/01 Applicant: Monte Adcox; Use: Special Use permit for a Single Wide Mobile Home; Located: at 1812 Oakley Road. BRlEE SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting. a Special Use permit for a Single Wide Mobile Home to be located at 1812 Oakley Road. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: N/A with a Special Use Request FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 6 ITEN! .DOES NOT REQUIRE REVfEVV COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: • ~OltlVl'1P C`~11ltMle,IC1FV~~ APPROVED Ca REJECTErJ ~ ~ REMOyED C~ POSTPONED ~ HEARD ~ E~ ~ ®AT~ '~ 0~~.+'I~..~~~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5-480, 11/01; Applicant: Monte Adcox Use: Single Wide Mobile Home Location: 1812 ®akley Road {Wrightsboro Community) Preliminary Staff Findings 1. The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. A. The single wide mobile home site will be located on approximately X20 acres. Presently, no existing structures are located on site. The mobile home will be located in the southeastern portion of the tract. B. The mobile home is be served by individual well and septic tank. C. Access to the site will be from a 1 ~ foot access road to Oakley Road (SR 1329). D. The area is served by the Wri~htsboro Fire Department. 2. The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning +Ordinance. A. The site is located in a R-20 Residential Zoning District. B. Minimum setbacks shall be met. C. No conservation resources are located where the mobile home is intended to be placed. D. The mobile home is not located within the 100 year flood plain. 3. The Board roust find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting~property or that the use is a public necessity. A. The site is located adjacent to a mobile home park along with other mobile homes nearby. Several residential homes also exist nearby. B. The site is located on high ground in an open field and is screened on two sides. . «~~ .~~.,. ~~tl ~:. . ..:;~?1 t.~~l 5-4~0,11/Ol ~. The Baard must find that the location and character of the use if deveiaped according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the. plan of development for New Hanover County. A. The 1999 Land Classification Plan identifies this area as Resource Protection. This class provides for the. preservation and protection of important natural, historic, scenic, wildlife and recreational resources. B. No evidence-has been presented that this mobile home will significantly lower the value of nearby residential property. - . • • ai Case: 5-480, 11/01 Petition Summary Data Owner/Petitioner: Monte Adcox Existing Land Use: Vacant / R-20 Residential Land Classification: Resource Protection Zoning History: Zoning created in July, 1974 Water Type: Individual Wells Sewer Type: Individual Recreation Area: Castle Hayne Park Access and Traffic Volume: 16,000 ADT ('99 Data) Fire District: Wrightsboro Watershed and Water Quality Classification: Ness Creel: C(SW) Aquifer 12echarge Area: Secondary Conservation /Historic/ Archaeologic Resources: None Soils: Craven (Class III) Building Suitabilita~: Severe Limitations Schools: Aldern7an School District c~C r~ {This page intentionally left blank} ~`; a~ I. lVEW HAiVO~+ER COll~lTY BOARD 0~ COM~/l1SS!®iVERS REQUEST FOR BOARC ACTT®~! Meeting Cate: 11/05/01 Regular Item #: 6.2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department:. Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes Contact: Baird Stewart . SUBJECT: - " Z-730, 10/01; K.E. Austin Corporation; Request: R-15 to B-2 Highway Business.; Acreage; 0.13 Acres; Located at 5556 Carolina Beach Rd. • BRLEF SUMMARY: - The. petitioner is requesting a B-2 Highway Business .Rezoning for the rear or western portion of a parcel which fronts on the Carolina Beach Service Road at Monkey Junction: The majority of the site is currently zoned B-2 and is home to an unmanned fuel station. The property is also adjacent to the primary access to Grove Park Mobile Home Park. Brewster .Place subdivision south of the subject property has recently been developed. This area of the County was originally zoned in April 1971. The B-2 zoning designation originally ran parallel to the original right of way to a depth of 300'. As a result of development end transportation improvements in the area, additional right of way was acquired in the mid 90's to accommodate the service road, ultimately decreasing the depth of the B-2 district on the parcel to approximately 230' +/.. Staff recommends that using a physicat boundary such as the power lines or the center of the power line easement is the appropriate zoning boundary. Utilizing the powerlines as a boundary would approximately align the zoning district on this parcel to the zoning line on the parcel to the north. The power Fine also marks the division of the property between developed area and woods. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: The petitioner presented the rezoning request. No one spoke in opposition to the request. After • some discussion regarding the. location of the existing B-2 zoning fine, staff's recommendation and buffering requirements; the Planning Board voted 5.0 to approve the rezoning as submitted by the petitioner. - FUNDLNG SOURCE: - N/A . ATTACIiMENTS: 4 ITE1~1 DOES NOT RE'v2U6RE REVIEW COUNTY MAiVAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~ll(~1TY I/C~MMI~SION~R APPROVED ~/ REJ~CTElJ ^ - RE~.~04J~1 POS1 PONED ® ' ~IEARD ~ t SATE ~ ~ ~5 CASE: Z-730, 10/O1; APPLICANT: K.E. Austin Corporation REQUEST: R-15 Residential to B-2 Idighway Business ACREAGE: 0.13 Acres LOCATION: 556 Carolina Beach Road LAND CLASS: Developed -The purpose of the Developed class is to provide for continued intensive development and redevelopment of existing urban areas. These areas are already developed at a density approaching 1,500 dwelling units per square mile. Urban. services are already in place or scheduled within the immediate future. IVlost of the land within the City of Wilmington is designated as developed, except for some Urban Transition and Conservation areas. Density may exceed 2.S units per acre within the developed class, depending upon local zoning regulations. ' PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10/=4/01: The petitioner presented the rezoning request. No orie spoke in opposition to the request. After some discussion regarding the location of the existing B-2 zoning line, staff s recommendation and buffering requirements; the Planning Board voted ~-0 to approve the rezoning as submitted by the petitioner. STAFF SUP/1MARY: The petitioner is requesting- a B-2 Highway Business Rezoning for the rear or western portion of a parcel which fronts on the Carolina Beach Road Service Road at Moni:ey Junction. The majority of the site is currently zoned B-2 and is'home to an unmanned fuel station. The property is also adjacent to the primary access to Grove Park Mobile Home Park. Brewster Place subdivision south of the subject property has recently been developed. This area of the County was originally zoned in April 1971. The B-2 zoning designation ran parallel to the original right of way to a depth of 300'. As a result of development and transportation improvements in the area; additional right of way was acquired in the mid 90's to accommodate the service road, ultimately decreasing the depth of the B-2 district on the parcel to approximately 230'-~. The ivtonkey Junction area has under?one a significant transformation from a small commercial node serving local residents to a larger and developing regional commercial node. Some of the properties along the service road have recently been developed or redeveloped. Having the zoning district boundary coincide with the parcel line makes logical sense, however, in this case Sta#'f recommends that using a physical boundary such as the power lines or the center of the power line easement is the appropriate zoning boundary. Utilizing the power lines as a boundary would approximately align the zoning district on this parcel to the zoning line on the parcel to the north. The power line also marks the division of the property between developed area and woods. f~ .. ~ ~ tt,,.:~1 ~; '~ ~ Case: Z-730, 10/01 Petiti®~ S~~rnary I~at~ Owner/Petitioner: K.E. Austin Corporation Existin,~ Land Use: Vacant (area behind GoGas) Land Classification: Developed _ Zoning History: April 7, 1971, (Area 4) -. Water Type: Well } .Sewer Type: County Sewer and Septic tanks Recreation Area: River Road Park ~. Access & Traffic Volume: 2~ 000 1999 ADT ( ) Fire District: Myrtle Grove . ~, Watershed & Water Quality Classification: Motts Creek C(SW) Aquifer Recharge-Area: Primary Conservation/Historic/Archaeolotric Resources: None Soils: Lynn .Haven, Class. III Septic Suitability: Class III (Severe Limitations) Schools: Bellamy Elementary a7 ~~ l., {This page intend®nally left blcenk} ~, NEW HAN®VER C®IJNTY BOARD ~E C®IVIMISSI®NERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTi0~1 Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Re ular Item #: 6.3 Estimated Time: Page Number: g Department: County Manager Presenter: Dave Weaver Contact: Dave Weaver SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Consideration ofi Support fior Designation of Futch Creek as an ' ®utstanding Resource Water BRIEF SUMMARY: The Northeast New Handver Conservancy has requested the NC Environmental Management Commission (EMC) to upgrade the classification of Futch Creek from SA to Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW); `as discussed in the first attached letter. The County's Tidal Creeks Advisory Board has also requested the upgrade in the second attached letter. The major difference between SA and ORW (also referred to as SA-ORW) is that ,the State's "high density" development option can be done along SA waters, while in ORW waters no high density development can be done within 575 feet of the shoreline. High density development, according to State regulations, is where .lots are less than 1/3 of an acre or the impervious surface is greater than 25%,, High density development requires an engineered stormwater design that retains up to 1 1/2 inches of rainfall. Considering that the County zoning generally is R-20S or R-20 (1/2 acre lots - 20,000 SF) in the Futch Creek. area which severely .limits the potential for high density development, a reclassification from SA to ORW should have little effect on development. The third attached letter from Planning staff provides more detail on the State regulations. f RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: The Board should consider the reclassification. FUNDING SOURCE: No funding involved: .ATTACHMENTS: Attached Fetters REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: Approve FINANCE: N/A BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER°S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend the reclassification as noted above. ~; , COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~OUNTIP C4NfM(SSIONFR~ ' APPROVED ^ REJECTED ^ REMrt{Ep d. / POSTF'OVED HERRD ~°,,,,,///~ ~~,NOV~R ~~ ?k'yi ~ G~f',< ~¢ 1r 9A ~ n a, :~~02 ~°'~ NORTH 6P~ \c~v IIannr•ci' C:~tcnl.e• 't'idal Creeks Program \Y'illiam il. Casccr I7ou Cunke Curlt:on Fisher ~~~l ll l.'1 Cll 1'. ~1/lyC (ohr,lef£rics D,t~•ic L. luues acoti: \-IcLendon \darian't', ~Icl?llau] 1~1cid P. `i~homas (:1uul s ~\5ihild ~-~ l..lil. Cl LI [. ~CL'CCC tit Ice ~0~ ~E%;Ilnington, ~lo.rrh Carolina 25<ln l September 17, 2001. TO: T~Iorth Carolina Environmental Mana~~ement Commission FROt~:~i: New Hanover Cotmty Tidal Creeks ti~lanagementAdvisory Board SUBJECT: Outstanding Resource Waters Designation for Futch Creek The New Hanover Cotuity Tidal Creeks Management Advisory L carol supports the Northeast Ne~v 1~anover Conservancy's petition for Fu~tch Creek to be designated an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW). The New Hanover Coulaty Tidal Creeks Management Advisory Board is a citi:?en actviso~ry board appointed by the County Commissioners to assist the coon v in the implementation of a Tidal Creeks ~1~rater Qualit}' Enhancement Project directed at the ooi.mt~%'s estuarine ~~%atersheds. New .Hanover County has received a 6 million dollar Clean Water Management Trust Fund Grant and has agreed to contrihute another :11.5 million dollars for water quality projects over a five-year period. Fu ch Creekwaterslied is one of the sip estuarine watersheds where the Board is focusing its efforts. Further, the County's LAMA Land Use Plan Update and Comprehensive Plan ca.7ta;i.ns policies that support this de~s~ignation for E'utch Creek, including the preservation and restoration of shelltishing and tivater quality and vital estuarine resources. A significant portion of the creek's watershed is classified in the plan. as Resource Protection, which provides additional water quality protection through specific development regulations and density controls aimed at reducing impervious surfaces. .Designating Eutch Creel: as a North. Carolina Ot'ltstanding Resource Water rurther supports the Advisory Board's goat of protecting, restoring, and enhancing water duality in Mew 1-lanover County. HoGVe Creek has had that designation for a number of year-s and has been able to sustain development v,,rhile main aining its water quality. ~We hope that the Environmental Management Commission approves this designation as an endorsement of New Hanover County's efforts in protecting the resources o~fthe creek. We also invite ~lnembers of the Commission. to attend our meetings and learn more about our Tidal Creeks Program. Please accept this memorandum, approved by the New 1-lanover County Tidal Cree:Ks Board on September 7, 2001, as an endorsement of the O.RW designation for Futeh . Creek. ' -" " ~'~ ~,t ~; 'I1~ (lanacc.r (:utmly ~Cicml !a,ccls Pn ;;r~,un a •t l,~'~mttp iniu:ar~c Ui tcl$c„ aar.cr uualiic t„r rs m 't~u~cla i., reel . 'agrs 1 ,.col,, l~(uU~c CrrtJ<.'YraJlcn~ (~'sel:, I Ic~t-rcu <_.c.ci: ,md Vi'ne s•i' Crock. 1'hc.prggr:rmw'as establi~hrd in 1`19N':m~ i~ ltarrialty fiinded t'hronen ,t f;rnm 1'r~~m Qte 4orfh C;t:vurat Canau 1C4irc: hlamu;on.ent'liu_;r. i4ind. firtrh craela ha<rvc rn>eG hnrvv rrev?a lrrndlev ~ree.4. lrnnr/tt/. rr•nv.l v~lr?; i=av rrcel= Ghris'O'Keefe, AICP s New Hanover County Planning Department g _- 414 Chestnut St. Ste. 304 0 Wilmington, NC 28401 .. 1 - ~ Phone: (910) 341-7444 ~ - Fax: (910) 341-4556 e-mail: cokeefena co new-hanovecnc.us . ~ . ~? ~ ~~ ~.y~~~'~~. I ~~~ ~ 'k. ~ ~~~ ~r, :. Iiti~ ie _curas 'y:-., . .. t: s r To: Dave Weaver, Asst. County Manager Frmira: Chris O'Keefe, Sr. Planner C~: ®~t~: September 21, 2001 ~~; ORW designation for Flitch Creek Following. is a description of how the regulations would change if Flitch Creek v/ere to be designated an Ot.itstanding Resource Water (ORW). The North Carolina Administrative Code regulates development on lands draining into water bodies classified as ORW.; Projects proposed within 575 feet of these areas must meet the State standards for the ".Low Density Option" as described below and in 15A NCAC 02H .1005 (2): The "Low~Density Option" permits development that has: a) A built-upon area of 25% or less;. or proposes development of single family residences on lots with one-third of an acre or greater with abuilt-upon area of 25% or less; b) stormwater runoff transported primarily by vegetated. conveyances; conveyance system shall not include a discrete stormwater collection system. c) A 30-foot wide vegetative buffer The''Low Density Option" described above is identical to the current regulations which apply to SA waters in our tidal creeks. The difference between SA and SA-ORW~is that in SA-ORW there is no "High Density .Option" within 575 feet of the Outstanding Resource Water. Rules for development in SA waters extend to one-half mile from the' water body thus the "High Density Option" is permitted in areas beyond 575 feet from Outstanding Resource Waters. . The SA-ORW regulations will also require projects draining to saitwaters classified as ORW that impact the Areas of Ehvironmentai Concern (like Flitch Creek) to delineate the AEC on project plans. After a request to classify SA"waters as ORW has been received, and permission has been granted to schedule a public hearing for reclassification, only development .plans that meet the rules for ORW waters will be permitted: , If you .have questions or need more info, you know where I can be found, The,Code is attached for your information. ~ Page 1 3/ If an applicant objects to the requirements to protect. high quality waters and believes degradation is necessary to accommodate important social and economic development, the applicant may contest these requirements according to the ' provisions of G.S.143-215.1 (e) and 150B'?3. History Note: rluthoriry G.S. 1 +3-211.1; 1-13-213.1; 1 X13-Z13.3(a)(1); Ejf. October 1, 199; .4mencleclEJf.Azrgustl, 1998; April 1, 1996. 15A NCAC 02II .0225 OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (a) General In addition to the existing classifications, the Commissionmayclassify unique and special surface watersofthe • state as outstanding resource waters (ORW) upon finding that such waters are of exceptional state or national r~'rea_~na!or ecological significance and that the waters have exceptional water quality while meting the following conditions: (I) that the water quality is rated as excellentbased on physical, chemicalor biological information; (?) the characteristics which make these waters unique and special may not be protected by the assigned narrative and numericalwater quality standards. (b) Outstanding Resource Values In order to be classified as OP.`N, a water body must exhibitone or more of the foib~~m?g values or uses t o demonstrate it is of exceptional state or national recreational or ecological significance: (1) there are outstanding fish (orcommerciallyimportantaquatic species) habitat and fisheries; (2) there is an unusually high level ofwater-based recreation-o r [he potential for such recreation; (3) the waters have already received some special designation such as a North Carolina or National VV~ and .Scenic River,Native or SpecialNative Trout Waters; National WildlifeRenrge, et:., which do.not provide anv water quality protection; (4) the waters represent an imporant component of a state or national park or forest; or (5) the waters are of special ecological or scientific significance such as habitat for rare or endangered spec:iv~s or as areas for research and education. (c) Quality Stan rds forORR~ (1) Freshwat r!~later quali ondi ions shaif~arlym intainand pr ect th outstanding resourcevai<res^~t~' waters .assi ed ORW. Nlanage~nent str~regres to otect res rce value shall be dev~~r' peg on ite spec• rc basin during e procee ings ~~t classify w ters as RSV. At a r ~inimumno.rfew disCh~ tres or ex ~ nsions o~ exi ng discharge~fll be permitted, ~! stormwater corhtrols for~all new d~-,- lopment tivities requ~<i g an Erosion and Sedimentation Control flan in accordan~c,~fh rules estabiishe~:i bydre NC Sedimentation Control Commission or an appropriate local erosion and sec(imentation control pro~Tram shall be required to follow Che stormwater provisions as specified in 15A NCF:C 3H .1000. Specific stormwater, requirements for OP~4V areas are described in 1 S,A NCAC 2H .1007. (2) Saltwater. Water quality conditions shall clearlymaintain and proteci the outstanding resource vai_ues of ~,vaters classified ORbV. Management strategies to protect resource values shall be developed on a site-specific basis, during the proceedings to classify waters as OR~V. At a minimum new development ' .shall comply with the storm~.vater provisions as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .1000. Specific stormwater management requirements for saltwater OR~,V"s are described in 15A NCAC 21-1 .1007. New non-discharge permits shall meet reduced loading rams and increased bufrer zones, to be determined on a case -by-case basis. No dredge or fillactivities shall be allowed ifthose activities would result in a reduction oftheb~ds of submerged aquatic vegetation or a reduction of shellfish producing habitat as defined in 15A NC.~.C3I O'101(b)(20)(A)and (B), except for maintenance dredging, such as that required to maintain access to existing channels and facilities located within the designated areas or maintenance dredging for activic~s such as agriculture. A public hearing is mandatory for ar~y proposed permits to dischar~Te to ~~:'aters classified as OR~V. Additional actions to protect resource values s hall be considered on a site specific basis during the proceedings to cttssify~ waters as OR~,~' and shall be specified in P,aragrtiph~(e;ofthis Rule. These actions may include anything with;nthepo~,lersor the commission. The commission shall also consider local actions which have been taken to protect a water body: iri determining the appropriate state protection options, Descriptions of boundaries of waters classified as ORW are ~c>Lrderl it Paragraph (e) ofthis Rule and in the Schedule of Classifications (1 SANCAC 2Q .002 through 2B .0317)as specified forthe appropriate river basin and shall also be described on maps maintained by the Division of Water Quality. • • a Eff.'January 1, 1988; Repealed Ejf. September 1, 199. 15A NCAC 02H .1005 STORNIWATER REQliIRENIEiVfS: COASTAL COti':'vTLES Alt development activities within the coastal counties which require a stormwater management permit in. ac:cordancevv><hPu!le .1003of this Section shay: manage stormwater runoff as follows:- (1) development activities withinthe coastal counties draining to Outstandinn Resource Waters { OR~V)shall ~u}i.;t. ~ s contained in Rule .1007of th~ ~ +~ '(?) development activities within one-half mileof and draining to SA waters or unnamed tributaries to SA waters: (a) Low Density Option: Development shall be permitted pursuant to Ruie .1003(d)(1}of th's Sectbn if the development has: '" (i) built-upon area of 2~ percent or less; or proposes development of single family residences on lots with. one-third of an acre or Qreater with abuilt-upon area of 2~ percent or less; (ii) stornrvater runoff transported primarilyby vegetated conveyances, conveyarlcesystem shat! not include a discrete stormwater collection system ~as de~ined in Rule .1002ofthis Section; ,;.., < ~ soot w! e .. ' , buffer. (b) High Density Option: Higher density deve opments sna oe perm!tte pursuant to ule .1003(d){2}ofthis Section ifstorm~.vatercontrol systems meet the followmgcr!tena: (i) no direct outlet channels or Wipes to SA waters unless permitted in accordancevvith 1~A NC.~C 2H .0126; (ii) control systems must be infiltration systems designed in accordance with Rule .100~i~P this Section to control the runoff from all surfaces generated by one and one-halfmches of rainfall. Alternatives as described in Rule .1`008(h) of this Section may also be approved ifthey do not discharge to surface waters in response to the design storm; (iii) runoff: in excess of the design volume must. flow overland through a vegetative filter designed in accorc'iance with Rule .1008of this Section ~.vith a minimumlength of ~Ofeet measured from mean high water of SA waters; (;) development ~~rctivities within the coastal counties except those areas defined ih Items (1) and (2) of this Paragraph: (al Lovv Density Option: Development shall be permitted purse ant to Rule .'I 003(d)(I ~f tti5 SectX]n if the development has (i) built-upon area of 30 percent or less; or proposes development of single fa!r.ily residences on lots with one-third of an acre or greater with abuilt-upon area of 30 • percent or less; (ii) storm~.vaterrunofftransported pr;marilyby vegetated conveyances; conveyances;isten,,' shall not include a discrete stormwater collection system as defined in Rule .1002ofthis Section; (iii) a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer. (b) -High' Density Option: Higher density developments shat{ be permitted pursuant to Rufe 1C0~(d){2bfthis Section ifstorinwatercontrol systems meet the following criteria: (i) control systems must be infiltration systems. wet detention ponds or alternative stormwater management syste tr,s designed in accordance tivith Rufe .I OOSofthis Sc~t~•n; . (ii) control systems mt!st be designed to control runoff fromallsurfaces generated by one inch of rainfall Historti~ Note: ~lzrlhorih~ G.S. 1-l3 -? 1=,.1; 1 a3 -1.1=1.7; I ~{3 -113.1; 1=l.i -113.3(cr); Eff. September 1, 199,1. ~~~J 15A NCAC 02H .1006 STORNtbV~ R REQUIREI"Y~IEiYI'S: HIGH QUALITY ~~'ATERS Alldevllelopmentactivities.whichrequire stormwater managementpermitunderRule.1Q03ofths~ mileof and draining to waters classified a~ High Quality ~Va~ers (-fQW) shall manage s ormwater r provis?ions outlined in this Rule. N[ore stringent storm er mat/agement measures maybe require where it is determined that additional m`lasures are ~quired to protect water quality and maintain e, of these waters. ;'~ ~ ~ (1) All waters classifieJd'as WS~'or WS-11 (I~A.NCAC 2~ .0212 and .0214)and all~~,a counties (Rule .lOU~of this Section) are excludedfromthe requirements ofthisR jequirements for tor-mwater managements` (Z) ~ LowDensity O tion: Development shad be permittedpursuant to Rule.1 03(c) ~/ develo ment his ~%' ~ction and arewrthinone offinaccordatlcevviththe ''- "~ ~ _ n a case -by-case bass l stingand antic~ated tue; ters located tnthecoastal ulesincetneya'!rezdyhave ~l~fthis Section ifthe u d P (a) built-t pon area of 12 percent or less or proposes single familyresidential development on bts of one acre or greater; (b) stormwater runoff transported primarilyby vegetated conveyances; conveyance systemshallnot include a discrete stormmvater collection system as defined in Ru',e .1002of this Section; (c) a 30 foot wide veuetative buffer. (3) High Density Option: Higher density developments shall be permitted pursuant to Kole .1003(c)(?~lhs Section ifstormwatercontrol systems meet the following criteria: (a) control systems must be wet detention ponds or alternative stormwater management systems designed in accordance with Rule .I OCSof dlis Section; (b) control .systems must be designed to control runoff from all surfaces generated by one inch of rainfall. History Note: ,~luthorityG.S. i=f3-Z1={.1; 193-?1=1. 1-13-??~.1; 1=13-21a.3(a); Fff. Seprernber• 1, 199; ~!mencled EfI: December I, 199. ISA NCAC 02H .1007 STORiti~11VATER REQUIREitiIENi"S: OUTSTANDING RESO U~CE WATERS All development activities which require a stormwater management permitunde rRule.1003ofthis Section ar.dvvh~hdta;nto waters classifed as Outstanding Resource ~,~'aters (ORttij shall manage stormwater runoff in accordance with T,heorov~~ns of this. Rule. Wafer qualify conditionsshall clearly maintain and protect the outsCandi ng resource values ofwaterscW~ssi~a as Outstancfinf7 Resource Waters (ORbV). Storrmvatermanagementstrategies to~ protect resource values of waters e><issi.~d as ORGV shad be developed on a site speci(~te basis during the proceedings to classify these v~~ate~rs as Oi~~W. `I~he requirements of this Rule serve as the minimumconditions that must be met by development activities. More stringent stormwater management measures may be required on a case -by-case basis where it is determined that add~ionalni:astu~ are required to protect water quality and mainiainexisting and anticipated uses of these waters. (1) Freshwater ORWs: Development activities which require a stormwater management perrr~underIvile.1C03 of this Section and which drain to freshwaters eiassified as ORyV shall manage stormwater runoff as follows: (a) Low Density Option: Development sha!i be permitted pursuant to Rule .1003(d)(1 bf this Section if the development has: (i) built-upon area of 12 percent or less or proposes single fatniiyresidenti a! development on Icts of one acre or greater; (ii) stormwater runoff transported primarilyby vegetated conveyances; conveyance system shall not include a discrete stormwater collection systerl; as detned in Rule.l002ofthis Section; and (iii) a~30 foot wide vegetative buffer. (b) High Density Option: Higher density developments shall be pern~ined pursuant to Rule .1003(d)(2)ofthis Section ifstornrwatereontro{ systems meet the followingerite<ia: (i) control systems must be wet detention ponds or alternative stormwater m•anavemeni systems designed in accordance with Rule.l008ofthis Section; and r -~ r . A..._ i (ii) cc,ntrol systems must be designed to control runoff from all surfaces generated by one inch of rainfall. (2} SaltwaterORWs: Development activities which require a stormwatermanagementpermitunder Rulz1~ ofthis. Section and •~r;hich drain to saltwaters classified as ORW shall manage stormwater,runoffasfoibws: (a) Within 57'5 feet of the mean high water 1 ine of designated ORW areas, development activities shall comply wi ih the low density option as specified in Rule .1005(?}(a)of this Section. (b) Projects draining to saltwaters classified as OR~V that impactthe Areas of Finvitvr>tr~ntalConczm (AEC). deternrined pursuant to G.S.113A-I 13, shall delineate the ORW AEC on the projzctp~ns and conform to low dznsity requirements as specified in Rule .l 005(2)(apf this Section within the ORW AE(:. (c) After the i_'omrnission.has received.. a request to classify Class SA waters as ORGV and given permissi,.: to the Director to schedule a public hearing to consider reclassification and untilsuch timeas specific stormwater design criteria become effective, only development which melts the requirements of Rule .1003(d)(3){A),(B) and (C) and Rule .1005(2)(a)of this Section shal{ be approved within 575 feet of the mean high water line of thesz waters. HisloryNote: .Authority G. S'. 193-?19.1; 193-21-J.7;~143-?15.1; 143-?1~.3(a); Eff. September 1, 1995. lSA NCAC 0?I3.1003 DESIGiN OF STORMtiVATER iv1ANAGENfENT ivIEAStiRL,S (a) Stnrctural StormwaterCgntrol Options. Stormwatercontroi mzasures which maybe approvzd pursuant to this Ru'~and which shall not be considered innovative include: (]) StormwaterinFltritionsystems including infiltration basins/ponds, swales, and vegetative filters; • (2) Wet detention ponds; and • (3) Deviczs'approved in accordance with Paragraph (h) ofthis Rule. All stormwater management structures are subject to the requirements of Paragraph (c) of this Rule. (b) Innovative Systems. Innovative measures- for controlling stormwater which are not well established through actual experience maybe approved on a demonstration basis under the following conditions: (1) There is a reasonable expectation that the control measures willbe successful; (?) ~ The projects are not located near High Quality Waters (HQW); (3) ~ ~ Nlonitorin> requirements are included to verify the pzrformance ofthe control n~~easures; and ~(=[) Alternatives are available ifthe control measures failand shall be rzquirzd tivhen the Director determines that the systerTi has :ailed. ~ _ (c) GeneralEngin_eeringDesignCri~teria>=orAllProjects. (l) The size ofthe system must take into account the runoff at the ultimate built-out potential froma~surfaces draining to the system, including any off-site drainage. The storage volume of the system shall be calculated io provide for the most conservative protection using nrnoff calculation methods descrbedon .pages A.1 and.A.2 in "Contro(lina [Irban Runoff: A PracticalManual For Planning And Desi~ningL`rt~an E3NIPs"which is hereby incorporated by reference not including amendments. This document is avaifZbk. throwgh the Metropolitan Washington (D.C.)Council of Governments at a costof forty dollars 0,.40.00). This method~is also described in the Division's document "f1n Overview of Wet Dztention BasinI~sign." ` Othzr engineering methods may be approved if these methods are shown to provide for equivalent . protection; (3) . Ali side slopes, being stabilized with vegetative cover she! I he no steeper than 3:I (horizonta} to vertical; (3) Allstormwatermanagemer.tstructures shall be located in recorded drainage easzrrierts fbrthepurposesof operation and maintenance and shall have recorded access easements to~thz nearest public right-of-~,vay. These easements shall be granted in favor of the party rzsponsible for operating and maintaining the ~~ stormwater r~~anagement structures; (4) Vegetative filtzrs designed in accordance with Paraarapil (f) of this Rule arz required fromtheover~wofall infiltrationsvstems and discharge of all stormwater wet detention ponds. These filters shall be at Ieast30 feet in length, except where a minimumlzngth of 50 feet is required in accordance with Rule .1005{2`(b;(i~)of , this Section; ~,,,. ~~ 1~E i~A1V®°~ER COUNTY ~®ARD ®F C®~9~I11SS1~~IERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTiO~ ' IVleeting Date: 10/01/01 Regular Item #: 2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Legal Presenter: Bruce T. Shell, Finance Director Contact; Wanda M. Copley, county Attorney, Bruce T. Shell, Finance Director S U B.! ECT: Final Approval ©# ~ie~~r Hano~rer Ce~.~nty Certificates of Participation, Series 2001 BRIEF SUPnMA~2Y: The County Commissioners conducted a Public Hearing on Septei-nber 17, 2001 regarding the documents included below. jThe County Commissioners are now required to approve a Final Resolution which includes tfPe following documentation: ® Installment Financing Contract; ® Deed of Trust and Secur~ty Agreem i nt ~ Indenture of Trust; ,, ® Preliminary Official State ent; ,1 ~ Contract of Purchase; and ® Letter of Representation (fr \~ the County to the Underwriters) 6RECOMMENDED MOTION AND ~E UESTED ACTIONS: Approve the attached Resolution. FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS; ~ ~~ o ?~ Octoberl stResolution. REVIEWED 8Y: LEGAL: Approve FINP,NCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESODRCES:,N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND, RECOMMENC Recommend approval of attached resolution. ~^, ~~; ~~ COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMME~1, 7S: ~`~ ,. ,_ ~- ' J "~ f~ `°. m' NEB HANOVEI~ COllNT~( ~OAR® Of COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION ..Meeting Date: 11I05/O1 Regular Item #: 7 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Parks Presenter: Neal Lewis/Chris O'Keefe Contact: Neal Lewis/Chris O'Keefe . SU$JECT: Gordon Road Lake and Property BRIEF SUMMARY: . A parcel of land, approximately ninety (90) acres in .size, consisting primarily of a lake, has been offered to New Hanover County for use as a passive public recreation area. The property is owned by the State of North Carolina and is considered as a wetland impact mitigation measure by the Corps of Engineers for I-40 impacts. The lake was created when I.40 was constructed. The North Carolina Department of Transportation will use the property for the excavation of additional fill material for the construction of the Northern By-Pass. Once this is completed, the lake will be larger than it is now, approximately sixty (60) acres in size, and a reclamation project will result in the, lake, the shoreline and the adjoining slopes being left in condition acceptable for recreational use. if New Hanover County accepts the property, the County must commit to providing and maintaining basic passive recreational facilities (trail, picnic shelter, rest rooms, roads and parking). Acceptance by the County should include requirements that whomever excavates the fill material for the Northern By-Pass be required: 1) to construct the shoreline and slopes in a •manner acceptable to the County and the Corps of Engineers, 2) to construct an access road to the .property, and 3) to construct a. fence along that portion of the property boundary currently being used for illegal access to the property. New Hanover County would need to send a letter to the Council of State, requesting that the property be deeded to New Hanover County. The letter must state a commitment on the part of the County to provide passive public outdoor recreational facilities on the property, and that the County will maintain the property in accordance with the conditions set forth by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. There is a desire by NCDOT that this be done as soon as possible, so that-the contractor currently working on the Northern By-Pass can utilize fill material from this site. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends that the Board direct staff to prepare all necessary letters and take all necessary steps for the County td acquire the lake. FUNDING~SOURCE: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Photographs, reference charts, preliminary plans and rough cost estimates will be provided in a presentation at the meeting. REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: N/A FINANCE: Approve .BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A t~lU~~~a! GUMl~ISSION~~ COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMME9VDATIONS: APPROI~ED C~ Recommend the County write the Fetter to the Council of State as requested above~~~ ^ COMMISSIONERS'ACTIONS/COMMENTS: pr/T,:LNED ^ HEARD ® I x=r ~ ~y ^r:. Zt, _~ u , wq. +o. ~. rsC, 'S t ' ~,. S~ y1 '.^~'~ ~~~ ~: YFF: ~w.G ~c'..~v i fir, ~, SSS ?}~ '::f~tw.. f 1Y 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ "• r~ ~.,..~...> :J=fit ."r`r .. `t: :y.:I fi''`r Cc Y ~,. } t Gordon Ronal Pond Property '~ I9evelopment Cost Summary November 5, 2001 • ITEM CGST ESTIMATE 1. Perimeter Fencing (7,500'x6') $ 80,000 2. Access Road (900'x20') 50,000 3. Parking Lot (50 Spaces) 40,000 4. Trail anal Bridge 200,000 5. Rest Room Building 100;000 6. Picnic Shelter(s) 30,000 (each) 7. Signs, Gates, Landscaping 25,000 8. Small Boat Launching Ramp and Pier 100,000 _. _. ~'®TAL $ 625,000 ~/3 Chris O'Keefe, AICP New Hanover County Planning Department 414 Chestnut St. Ste. 304 Wilmington, NC 28401 Phone: (910) 341-7444 Fax: (910) 341-4556 e-mail: cokeefe(a~co.new-hanover.nc.us ergo To: Mr. Allen O'Neal, County Manager From: Chris O'Keefe, Sr. Planner (y' CC: Dexter Hayes, Dave Weaver, Neal Lewis Date: August 31, 2001 6te: Harris Road Mitigation Pond (Crystal Lake Park) Tc~ Krm~ l lar.nvrr Cl;rr:c}' >r: n-. .1.::. r.o... r Allen - As per your request, following is additional information regarding the Mitigation Pond and proposed future use of the above referenced site. Please advise about choosing an agenda date. I would be happy to put together a PowerPoint presentation with illustrations, aerial photographs and other pertinent information far the Commissioners Meeting if you think it would be helpful Harris Road iViitigation Site {Crystal Lake Park) Summary The State of North Carolina purchased a 94-acre site off of Harris Road to quarry fill material for the construction of 1-40. The site, which is now vacant, is composed primarily of a large clear water lake. The remainder of the property is divided between forested and barren land. The propefij has gone unmanaged for some time and is used illegally by recreational vehicle drivers, jet skiers and others. The State of North Carolina has an opportunity to stabilize the site and make some improvements. They are interested in deeding the site to Negri Hanover County for passive recreational use. NCDOT also would like to quarry additional fill from the barren portion of the site for construction of the HWY 17 Bypass. Additional quarrying would enlarge the lake and make this si e less attractive to recreational vehicle drivers. The Corp of Engineers has concerns about the future use of the site as i ewes as wetland mitigation for the Hwy 132/1-40 intersection constructed in the late 1980's. Use of the property must be consistent with mitigation goals that are to maintain wetland and/or~ripari n re~sou ces and other natural values of the property. The site may provide an excellent opportunity for future use as a Park. The park concept that has been proposed is consistent with the Corp's goals. If the County is interested in obtaining this property the Commissioners must submit a letter of commitment to the State illustrating proposed uses for the site. Timing Construction of the Hv/y 17 Bypass has begun and the need for fill is apparent. The DOT and their contractor APAC wi11 be forced to took elsewhere for fi11 if this deal cannot be worked promptly. if all goes smoothly the ~ Page 1 ~; :J . roperty could be transferred to the county within 6 months. Once the land is transferred, the County could f~hedule development as deemed;appropriate. Proposed uses for the site: ' Counfij Park - . Picnic Shelters Restroom Facility . ~ - Recreational Trail Non-Motorized Boat Usage Improvements and Cost- Fence around site -Approximately 7,500' X 6' chain link fence $75-90,000 Signage and gates - $25,000 Access Road - 900' X 20' - $50-55,000 . Parking {50 spaces) - $35-40,000 Picnic Shelter(s) - $30,000/each Trail w/ bridges - $200,000 Restroom - $100,000 Total Project Cost (estimate) - $515-540,000 Possible cost reduction ar~d funding opportunities Cost reduction for the fence and for some site clearing and grading.: may be possible in an exchange ~:~ APAC for permission to take fill for the Bypass project. APAC will rade the lake and im "~ 9 prove a ..helf' . around the perimeter. The shelf Will provide stability to, the banks of the lake arid`will provide a safety feature to help prevent water related death and injury. The following Grants may be available to help finance other aspects of the proposed park site: Adopt- a=Trail, Park and Recreation Trust Fund, Land and Water Conservation Fund, Resource Conservation and Development Funds. ~ s 14 V - ~ ~~~ .. , -~ ~~ y~ a~ ,fit r~s,~r at~~p :~ ,y~,~.~~ ~ t ~ x~ R ~ -M r t _ S •.'~h~+7, y~'i wr. ~` ~M Al -..._ T.' ~n5T 9'~ ~''g- xe ~~ ~'~a ~'' ~ 9~'~~ 3 '~ $4~•. ~~'~~m°.~~ i a' 'off -~ ,~, "y '-- -. ~ Ices e4;~~~~ ~~~°d~9 -~.ss"~ay~ t@~a~[r% `k~,d~"~~ ~ w c q>"; T -yeas ~ s ., a ;, w~~•av xq ~ ~ a7'r :;~u~7~~~.t.~' ..~~~~~•~ g y'gd'd~~~.e., ~§W~ ~~. '~z~ ~~'~46y ` ~" s~ya ;tea '"~ ; ~'s ~, pL ~~„ ~C ~ `~,"'l IR ,~ ~;. ~~ ~", ~~~ ~~~ara,-~i,~ $~ ~~~ ~,, ~~*' '~ '":cwt ,,a „, y ~F~ '~'~ sa, s =r~ i -f~1' ~'„~'~ -.e9,~`9`aaC ,~ s„ r ~h .~ .,,? i ~ • ?~ w~`0 ~~:. 4,d,, ~ ~ "~~'' ems„ ~+- '~ ~ . ~~e`~ rn n ~ ~ ~~[F p "a ~, ,~1 ~ '~ '~ mn ~1 -:z ~ ~ cn ,~ r s ~~T q~ .i;y~ i} ~a.~ ! 1r a-~ "S~~" Q [- ~;,. ~'4c "i s~`9~ !~,'~~ •~E ~'`~,g~.. -°~~.~~;~~ ~~,~~~ ~'+~"~ a~ ~ ~~" 4t ~~~~4~~~~ $~ ~~ 1 ~~ x ~ ~~[.. ~ :~J 4~ ~ ~ ~~ R ~~ ~ e'"- ~~~ ~~} ~! J. 'a ty wM .• l~ ~ +4+ ~,~ §~~4wr~.. •i ~~a .. ,l~ ~ '~~/~ r ~' ~ ~ ~ ~„ yw a ~ - ~ ,~ .t ~ i A 2a~ s :.,"5~ "~ ~r~ } s } e~ y~'~a1 r,~ ~ ~~.~ '~ ~ s ~ ~''~ ~ _'` r ~~s ~ ~"~~yl ~ .~ o ~,'- ,,pp~~er '`~i ~ '~i Sw'"" y~`a 4~~'~ 9' t~} ~ ' ~ t ~ir~ ,.~°~:.~~~7'~5!{'g.,~,>~ -~.e~~s+ ~ z+`S~"~' t, gi~er'"`'+...~. S`~ ~1~ R'" Y'~ ~~ ~ e,- t^s* ~a°ti,~ arc {, S~p. > >~{ ' y ~ ,q ° j ~'4.''i oo +~i 3 : t.., ~yrkv ,"'- tf ~ ~ '° rr~ ~i~ '~, ~ ~EY~~~~~~~FY ay ~, ~ 6'1 V/..1 Y`.L6 ~ ~~r. y'sa~'~q/~ s Fr.+, 1'J~. *t . j. e1c~' ', S ~'~~+n' } ~'~ ~'j y ~>~ ~ '~ l ,F~'~k-. ° ,tom` a ~~~ }~ ~ "a v a-•~°,~ ~+~ ~ s ..~ .'° rya y~9~". ,~ ~?~' o:` 1~~ + ..'i .` y ~~~~ 'L~~. ;y~_ t~~. ~ ,v ~ ~ ~ ~.,~ a ,~ ~ i Op/ ,, r i~ r a ~ ~ ~ ~h,~ Q v~ , ,r~~ ~v 9y: s ~~ + ~-rf :~~ %"'4~'~~'~ ~ ~'.. " L "r-f ~.~+'a Cn ~ x,[ ~~ ~ F t s ., e L ~ } k Z C n, .r J' 1 ~ } . i'~°'S ~ ,~',~n~ v w ~ ,~ ~'vr' h w~ ~ ,I ,~ e~ ki'~ p. +-' t> „ a e ~ ~v #!' r a ae t ~ a~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ x -R , ,. T ~ '~ ~ ~r`~;5,, :.vr" ~ I u.. .Q i' .,~ ~ ~,s ., ~ ^P 9 '~ ~ sa- Ai fi 1~5y r " ;' ~'~p-y"®, 1 '-~ ~' ~.""° °eTp h. t Tr ~ a ° m~'a'+n~ ~~~ ~;.;~i ~ ~ j~~~ a~ ~'k~ 3~~N+yt:,~$FS qr a ~_~q a Ft,~ ~ ~,~~. ~ ~~~ - S[` ~yP , I ~:,[~~ ~ ~~ r~ "°"eaq: . ~ a7 ~ ~ "Y '+r N C ~~ slF +f/ ~`~'L,~ a ~Sl'N~a ~" r" S ~ ~"[.. I ~ "~ ~. R- ~+. ~' ~ 9 ~"a -a ~~a e~yt'd, d "~ 'tea.. ~ ~ 'w 4 ~ ~" ~ -°a~'~ ~y a ~: S +"s4c [ y"~ 3~ rr`, .,,.qg ~^~ yi~ s ~, ; -. _; J~~ ,~ ~. '.~ ~ i~. [ ''r '~''5. n 1~~~ ~+ q .rte *7 ~ ~ ~@ ~ ~,~r-`t ~1'A : ~ $ ~"-°f S ~ i ~, ~ ~ i ,2T ~^. q & ~. ~ - / ~ ~' ! -fin. t 9r ~~ a. god ~~ .r~ ~ - ~ ~~ 1. > r,,~ ,. ~ ,, ~~ ~'~ d `°~ n~~~ ~'i`' ~`~r, ~ ! r„~~ ' `°~ ~ gat r l ¢ ^ D9°' 4> ~,~it a k `~j , .~ a' ~ 4 ,~A ~ ~ {9 ~ ~' / 7~ Rye` , ' \ „~~{~~~~ ~ ~~,~ r+ C a'', 4 +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a (. z i,` ~ ~s "~ ~~~.ty- --v ~. ~ ~~ ~ rP Y, a§ .~r 7.~ - ~. ~.~ ~~"~w•~'~ir !" .g S~ (°• '~r~~^, ~ ~ r °, :. ~~ i. `~ i' =~l r• :i: S +, ~ .;~ {r. ~y r;,~'$'~ 5 t~' .;~ y~ -~_ y '°~, ~~~~' q -`:usm- s ` "'~. ~~ ~ a~ ~T3 ~~ 4'3 , - eav - f r i, ~y ~i _ j t,~, ~ ".',~i ' ~~ ~? i h~~ ~~i~~ P~ % r+ ~~r-T~ 7 ~"e+ ~' -~ ' I'J 4{ $'q S~f y~~~jS ~ y'.R i, ,: ~~~ ~.{~ '7L". aEt~ /yd ~,;y ~C: ~~~t_l ~+ ` _ ~ ....rte _ ~ ~ 4, A ~Clp ~~~-~ via - °. c , .~'•c' ~~x ~ ,y _ ~~ '*5~~ a'~ti~'~~`t~ o~. v~r~ ~l ;. ,,.~~ "~~ ~ ~.r.;t. A. 4~ ° a£ 4t~'~ fir,` Mz~ ~k f fi~.;b ~' ssA i, ~ o ~ i ~ -:~ ~ ~ - ~` +t':~`'r f ru o r ya ~ x n'' -~~ ~~~*~r ~.. ate' Y ~ t4 '~ ~" ~,.~ f ~~' '~w-n , `. G ya, ~ 5 -_~- ~ A _ ets~ 2 d , 'f,RG} `Fk;~X :k Y t M1 f,u I '~jy7g~ 4 F ',. l ~ } c ~ } ~; ~~ ~ ~ :I; ~ . stn:' t F4 ~ P"i r a , k ,wxw 3~r * ~ ° ~ ,vim: ' z .l~ ~' ~~ `y ~~ .: ~ w i:`~- ~ - ~ +~~;>~--aer',~.' -' s.-.~'~ ~%a+' ~. y., - ~~~ t~. GP ` sk ,:~F h-J ~ ~ , ,i y{ i ~., ~ r~, - : ~-'~i ~yN~''w~at} t t L ,~~~b,~aq x >t ~F~. - 'L ~~ a~ ~~ x ~ _ e;s9. Fr 3 a ~~' ~, a ~ ~ ~"~.~'#.,,~~'~.~xr1 a ~hj'.~ t .~3 lSf'~ 5 4 Y~~ n~".^ ~.j'~+. ' ~E !l ,e _ C. r_k4'i, iM+ ~~~+I~.F~r 2 ~t yJ1 , ~~yC ~L 1 ~ac ~ k d.. F ~4x.v+ 44 ~~Q~~ _ 5.x:1 ~~ _> ~.i, 3 ~°t~v'~a~ Cv - ~.y+ n'~w~rty.et~4 zy ke°",,~~[~~ ~ , ;-~., ;~ -~;~rT~-, r ~ `~.,~ ti z _°° *~~~ti~ _- ~ +K ~ ~ r~~~ ~ x '~' ti =.~ •: ~u t--i' ; ~, ~"~~A~ }~ ,, _ F,t -~ mss' -~~ .as~i~', 't",~z 'd ~ a '~~ E v r~rn a ~' ~~ ?'~dh A~~ ~~ ~~~ti ~3 k' Y ~?~ .~ ~ - ~ ,1'${.r ~, ~ x 1 ~__ ~, ,`t°' _ i~ ~ M a"~i~•"t~.} r~ .t c~+ _ ~i- fi " Fem.,-Y tel°-~~"-.~, ` l - '„I ~ ~> ''~~ ~ d ~ ',~zyy 7, ~ - ~ S 3 ~ ~ r ~~F ~~G t~.i~ -r. tea„ ~ ''_ p ,,.~.{~.~ L,- :: ~ r ~ ~~~.~ k - ~ ~'~ K ,~~ ~~ ~~.' .n -~^'I'S `~ *r=" ~n^.~° ~`r ~ ``_' 3~ ~.'f• ~ +'~; ey^' .~ r7" s,1 ~ r~ ~ ~ ~* ~ '`4 -s ~- .g,~ $'3~~n~. ems.. '? ~' ~ ~ -~' a _~ ~}~y~ '~ ~ ~ }~"".- ~' '~ -~- a .~ ~' F 1. ~M~ ~~r~9 ~ '+kP ~~~i'E ~ [ ~'k~..- ~~'~'~4 ~s~?~(C.,~„ye ,_,~c,,~ ~ ~ *.%~~ t~'~ rn-~=,~~ 'Y, ~ : ~i ,r f ~j4~ - ~ rp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~y-~ 'r _ a~1 s_ c -aroma ~ ,.,,t - ~,,,,_-,,._ .,,~,~„ - '- - ,,, "°4°liNax ~~s_'`~,' ''2 vvy ~ ~ ' "y' 'k ~. ~~ .5/'' ~`- t ~" ~#' "g-"4 ~ ~."~~ ~~' ,.,~.F,.~~~'-aa.~y~u'.~"'fl ..~,'~,~ .ice ltF'r 4. §, 1 - ~ a ~` ~+ N ~ T' ~ ~ t P?r~.' ^" t V`i-~ ,~ .r y ~ ~-^x,R. ~ ~ ~~" 7+t'^7~.+~~...,'1 L.~ r ~'`' ~wr _ r-""' _ c .~r~`~'-'~~',,~- '~[' "^`~ .~ ~e ;.t! .,,z ~ ~* e~s @.,f6C ~° 5..~ ..~ ,,tom... - T ~ .r'. '1„-'~,c' A ~ i r ~,IC.. ~r ,'~ c, i I'c' .1 u•. i r [ ~ j~,~{~,,,,,, n'.'`$Y4X R[''~ r:.l ~,"' ~ - d. ~J ~„ ~ T'"` 'f.~ ~'"~~ ~~A ~ ~ r E. a 1 .. ~ ,k4'~,~. 1 .~ h >~,,~* " sY 4 ~pX,r'~j~a~ jq l ''~ Y ~ ~ .,y~ ~: ~ :~'S b'~' ~~~` ~ 2 ,~ ~ 'q .$' ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ c. ti..,. '7J ~v~J ~ ,c ~ i . ~ ~~ ~1 ~. ' :ice' ".~~. ^;~,' ~ ~"~` '.~~. ,,..§,~"°Q < <. °Y ~ ,: ~,~~~ +'A.cc:. ~.. e_e - ac;~ ~ 4 C "` ^` + ~. Y-y~~, ,~.r to s ~ a r~ i ~ ~ ~ r~ r~ ~ " ~r~ 9 r ~~ ~ ~f ~j ,E,~ ~, F ~d~~i~. y~1a .rki yf rt ~ r.i • • fVElnl HA~90VER COU(VTY BOAR® OF COMIVIISSION~RS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date:. 11/®5/01 Regular Item #: 8 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: County Manager . Presenter: Dave Weaver contact: Dave Weaver SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Draft. Conditional Permit for the Mason Lnlet Relocation Project BRIEF SUMMARY: Attached is the Corps of Engineers draft conditional permit for the Mason Inlet Relocation Project, along with a cover memo to the Board detailing the notable points of the permit and outlining our next steps.. It is necessary for the County to move forward in a timely manner in order to perform the work within the time frame of the permit. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• ~~ Staff. requests that the Commissioners approve the conditions ofthe~draft permit. FUNDLNG SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: REVIE~NED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: • Recommend approval of the permit ~ COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~4Uf~TY C~Mf~i~SIQN€ ' • APPROVED O / REJECTED REIVIOVED D POSTPONED HERRD DATA II o~o-l--.,. 1~~~~-~~~~~ ,,-fie'; ~m ~-~>:,--:R October 23, 2001 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dwe~ Weaver, Assistant `County Manager ~'~'" RE: ~ Issuance of conditional permit for theMasons Inlet Permit Relocation Project Attached is the primary document of a draft conditional. permit from the U. S. Corps of Engineers for the Mason Inlet Relocation ~project.~ :Copies of the hill draft conditional permit with all attachments, which is several inches thick, are being printed and will be available for review. The draft permit will be brought to the Board of Corrilnissioners for review and approval at the November ~ meeting. There are no major surprises in the draft permit. The conditional permit does include the following notable provisions: - Dredging will have to be completed prior to March 30, although it is verylikely that the dredging can be extended to at least May 1. This date is earlier than anticipated but still should allow for adequate time for completion. of the project. - The County will be responsible for any shoaling of the AIWW that may occur in the near vicinity of the project due to the proposed dredging of a new Mason Creek channel The Corps, however, will not require the County to annually contribute money to a fund for AIWW maintenance as was originally proposed. The newt steps in the process will be the following: - The permitting process must be completed. Federal agencies, most likely the li. S. . Fish and Wildlife Service may appeal the conditions of the permit through the "Q" ;.; ~.. process. In addition, the State must complete its permitting process based on the Fnyironmental Assessment prepared by the Carps. Both the Q appeal process and the State process "are anticipated to be completed by the first or second week of December based on~knowledgeable estimates, although the Q process potentially '~. .d • • • Board of County Commissioners , Page Number Two October 23, 2001 coLild take considerably longer. - A dredging contractor must be brought in to perform the work. We have maintained contact with the original dredging contractor; who successfully bid with the County to perform the work at a fair price last winter but was not able to do so because the dredging window closed before the permitting was complete.. Assuming negotiations with the contractor are successfil, this contract will be brought back to the Board of Commissioners for review and approval, at the November 19 meeting, with the intent for the contractor to begin construction in January 2002. It is important for the County to move forward in ~ timely manner with this project if implementation is to be successful. This project involves many diverse elements and is following a complex path. Please feel free to contact me or Greg Thompson if you have any questions or comments. . cc: Allen O'Neal, County Manager Wanda Copley, County Attorney Greg Thompson, Chief Project Engineer Mark Boyer, Public Information Officer ~/~ I)EPAI~'I'~'IEN'I' ®F' THE AI21l~I~' PEI~I@~II~' Permittee NEW HAN®V.E+.I~ C®UNT'~' Permit No. 199901052 Issuing Office CESA'W-IZG-I~ r~ NOTE:, The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any futrue transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of thatoffice acting under the authority of the commanding officer. Yoti are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: 'I'o relocate Ii~ason's Inlet, excavate Mason's Creek, construct~a sediment basin, and reno~arish the southern end of Figure Eight Island or the n®rthe~-n end of Vr'rightsville Beach, iffich~ding maintenance activities for thirty years. Project Location; Adjacent to the Atlantic Intraeoastal Waterway (AIW~V) and the Atlantic ®cean, in Wrightsville Beach and Figure Eight Island, Nero -Hanover County, 1lTorth Carolina. Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on Heeember 31, 2031 If yon find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your. request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon 'the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination required-to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site. is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. ENG FORM 1721; Nov 86 k i ~ ~ h- EDI~~ ~ 2 IS OBSOLETE. (33 CFR 325 (Appendix A)) Is _ t i ~~ _ ~ f 4. If you sell'the property associated with this pern~it, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the. space provided and forward a copy of the permit to~this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. ~~ ~. -You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit, ' • Special Conditions: S~+ ~ r~~'T'ACI~~D SP~CI~L C'®l~tl)~T'I®I~S Further Information: L Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: (X) Section 10 of t1leRivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). ~(Y) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). ( ) Section 103 of the 1%Iarine Protection, Research and Sanchiaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C, 1413). " 2. Limits of this authorization. a..Tlns pernzit~does not obviate the need to obtain otherFederal,~ state, or local authorizations required by law. b. This pernlit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing.or proposed Federal project. 3. Limits o:f Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. _Danaages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpennitted activities or From natLU-al causes. b: Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or fuhtre activities undertaken by or on behalf of the.United States in the public interest. , ' c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpennitted activities or stnletures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. s/ e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The detetnlination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made iri reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances wai~ant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (See 4 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a detetznination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the ternls and conditions of your perniit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit, unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. Your signahire below, as penmittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the ternls and conditions of this permit. (PERiviITTEE) NEW I~~NOVEI~ C®UNT4' (DATE) This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to~act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below. (DISTRICT ENGINEER) ~A~1ES dV. I)e~,~N'i', COI,ONEI, (DATE) When the strucriires or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transfen•ed, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property.• To validate .the transfer of this permit a.nd the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. - (TRANSFEREE) a 3 ,. . ~ f - ~ ~ }v ''~%' ;~, ~' 1 `~' ~2-. 5- (DATE) "U.S. GOVERN~/iENT PE2INTING OFFICE: !9s6 - 71i-425 ., s~ PEI2IVIIT C®1~1DITI®i\TS 1. The work will be constructed in strict accordance with the attached plans and all conditions of this permit. In addition, all initial work will be constructed in strict accordance with the construction methods and sequencing as described in Section 1.3 of the Corps Environmental Assessment (EA). , 2. The permittee shall conduct all work; both new construction and maintenance, between November 15 and March 30 of any year unless an exemption or extension.. has been specifically requested from and approved by the Corps of Engineers. 3. The permittee shall not perform any maintenance or other work after completion of initial construction of the project without providing a written report identifying. the need for the maintenance event. The permittee must submit this report to the Corps at least 120 days before maintenance activities are anticipated. Each request will include monitoring data and analyses. The Corps will coordinate with other federal and state resource agencies. The. Corps will evaluate each maintenance request to insure that project impacts, inchding cumulative effects, are reasonable, that the mitigation is appropriate, and that the maintenance cycles are as widely spaced.as practicable considering the need of the rriaintenance activity to stabilize the inlet within the inlet corridor. 4. The permittee shall provide 30 days notice and arrange apre-construction meeting. among the Corps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (\TCDCM), the applicant, and all contractors in order to discuss all permits and permit conditions, and to address all questions and concerns regarding the project. No construction or maintenance event will begin until the applicant and all contractors are aware of and fully understand the intent of all permit conditions.. : , ~. Priox to the start of construction or any maintenance event, bathymetric surveys will be taken of all areas to be temporarily or permanently impacted. These surveys will be submitted to the Corps and include the following: aerial photography; beach and offshore . profiles; new inlet area; sedimentation basin area, existing inlet area, Mason Creek area and Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway area. Following completion of the initial construction or any maintenance event, temporary work areas, including stockpiles, will be returned to pre-project contours based on the surveys. Post-project surveys will betaken of all restored temporary work areas. These surveys will be submitted to the Corps for verification that restoration is adequate. Restoration will be considered satisfactory only upon receipt of the Corps' approval. 6. Monitoring is required as follows. At the anniversary of the completion of construction a report will be provided to the Corps analyzing the data and providing an executive ~summ~ry of impacts of the project and mitigation accomplished. The monitoring requirements will be reviewed and modifed as appropriate in conjunction.with<t:he Corps review of a maintenance event. a. The permittee shall establish a minimum of three permanent monitoring transects (minimum distance 600 feet) in Mason Creek to monitor biota (including macro invertebrates} and physical conditions. Pre-construction data will be collected. b. The permittee shall establish a minimum of one permanent monitoring station in Banks Channel a minimum of 50 feet away from each side of the sediment basin to monitor biota (including macro invertebrates) and water quality. Pre-construction data will be collected. , c. The permittee shall monitor a minimum of twelve transects (between mean high tide and mean low tide along the beach disposal site): on Figure 8 Island for macro invertebrates and bird usage. Pre-construction data will be collected. 7. The permittee shall cooperate with the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) oyster seeding program in the project area by, providing dockage and loading facilities for barges used in the NCDNIF oyster seeding program. NCDMF w_ ill monitor this program to insure that areas seeded are suitable for oyster seeding and seed about 10,000 bushels of oysters annually until the first maintenance event. The Corps will evaluate this mitigation measure for its effectiveness in offsetting fisheries impacts as part of their review of the first maintenance event. 8. Dredging will be timed so that turbidities will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. (timed to avoid or halted just before and daring storms and. other periods of potential dtigh erosion,~carrrents, and tivaves) 9. The placement of dredged material in the existing inlet and along the beach will be timed so that turbidities will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. (timed to avoid or halted jzest before and during storms and other periods of potential high erosion, ccerrents, and waves) 10. The permittee shall not impact mature marsh on the north side of Mason Creek. 11. A11 sandbags and fragments will be removed from Shell Island Resort area and disposed of properly in accordance with NCDCM requirements. 12. This Corps permit does not authorize the permittee to tale an endangered species, in particular the piping plover (Charadrius melodus); the seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumulis), the West Indian manatee (Trichechus mccnatus) the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydcas), and the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta ecaretta). In order to legally take a listed species; you must have separate authorization under-the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (e.g., an ESA section 10 permit or a Biological Opinion (BO) tinder ESA section 7, with "incidental take" provisions with which you must comply). The enclosed US Fish and Wildlife Service .(Service). BO, dated March 14, ?001, and BO, amendment, dated. September 5, 2001, contain mandatory terms and conditions to implement the reasonable and prudent measures that are associated with `'incidental take" that is also specified in the BO. Yottr authorization under this Corps permit is conditional upon you compliance with all of the mandatory terms and conditions dated with incidental take of the attached BO, which terms and conditions are i o ted by reference in this permit. 5'~ Failure to comply with the terms and conditions associated. with incidental take of the B0; where a take of the listed species occurs, would constitute an unauthorized take, and it would also constitute noncorripliance with your Corps permit: However, the Service is the' appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of its BO; and with the ESA. For further clarification on this point; you should contact the Service. Should the Service determine that the conditions of the BO have been violated, normally the Service will.°enforce the violation of the ESA, or refer the matter to the Department of Justice. 13, The permittee shall undertake the project with extreme care. If, during construction or any maintenance event; submerged materials are encountered, the permittee shall move . work to another area and contact the Corps and the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources (NCDCR); Linderwater Archaeology Unit immediately at (910) 458- 9042 to investigate and determine the proper course of action. The Corps will advise the permittee when construction/maintenance may resume in the-area of the archaeological investigation. 14. Shipwreck site 0002MAI, the remains of a wooden sailing ship, is located approximately 200 yards north of the Shell Island resort. Prior to beginning work on the project, the permittee shall provideNCDCR with detailed plans for closure of the existing inlet. Upon receipt, NCDCR staff members will attempt to pinpoint the present location and nature of site 0002NIAI to assist engineers of the proposed project in avoiding damage to the shipwreck. . Address: NC Department of Cultural Resources Division of Archives and History 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 15. The permittee shall implement compensatory wetland"mtigation at the same time or prior to beginning project construction as proposed in the applicant's mitigation plan, Attachment 5 of the Corps' E.A. Any deviation from the wetland mitigation plan will be coordinated with the Corps and must receive specific approval before being implemented. 16. Following completion of initial construction of the~project, and for-the thirty year life of the project, the applicant will"implement a management plan for project upland's, including intertidal shoals and inlet shoulders, between Shell Island"Resort and the new inlet to protect and enhance this area for shorebird acid waterbird usage as described in .Attachment ~ of the Corps EA. At the anniversary of the completion of construction, and annually thereafter, reports evaluating the effectiveness of this management plan will be provided "to the Corps; NCDMF, USFWS, Audubon Society, .and NCWRC: This area will . be actively managed as shorebird mitigation and shall include these measures: I) the entire colony site must be posted clearly with signs that prohibit entry, 2) signs and posts must " encircle the entire colony, 3) the minimum buffer from active nests to-the edge of the posted signs must be 100 yards, 4) line must be strung bettiveen each sign post and small strips of flagging should be tied to the line, .5) dogs in the"area must be leashed at all .times, 6) the site must be patrolled regularly, and 7) the progress of the colony and/or Mover nests must be monitored as long as_the birds are nesting . 3 ~,, 17. The Wilmington District routinely surveys the AIWW, including the portion at its intersection with Mason Creels, in order to assess dredging needs for maintenance of navigability of the AIWW. The permittee shall notify the Wilmington District Regulatory Division two weeks prior to the commencement of construction, to~ allow the District to perform a surveyof the area of the AIWW. that will be potentially affected by the proposed project. If the District Engineer, in his sole discretion, determines that shoaling has occurred within the AIWW on Tangent 12, Section 3 between monuments T12-8 and T12-41, at any time during the life of the project and that such section should be dredged in order to maintain safe and efficient navigation on the AIWW, he will~so notify the permittee in writing.. The notification will specify the. area of the AIWW that must be dredged, the depth to which it must be dredged,, and the time frame within which dredging must begin (a minimum of 90 days will be allowed). The permittee shall cause the area of the AIWWspecified by the District Engineer to~ be.dre~dged in a manner and within the time frame specified in the notice. 18. Borings of the proposed work area do not reveal the presence of any unsuitable (non- beach compatible) material. The equipment and techniques to be used by the contractors allow for the-inspection of all materials. All material dredged from.Nlason Creek, and any add~itional~material that is determined to be unsuitable beach material will be pumped to~~ the diked settling area for removal of unsuitable material. The applicant shall test all dredged material for beach compatibility, and provide the tests to the Corps for confirmation before placing material on the beach. Material deemed to be non-beach compatible will not be placed on the beach or in the Corps' dredged material islands, but will be removed from. the project area and placed in a high ground site that has received specific approval from the Corps, NCDCM, and the North Carolina Division of Land Quality. 19. The permittee shall maintain the dike walls constructed around holding areas for dredged material to eliminate the release or escape of dredged material. Failure of a dike wall will result in the immediate cessation of pumping into the specific diked area. ~ Repair work on dike walls will not begin until specific permission is requested and received frorri the Corps and NCDCM with the exception of work necessary to provide emergency repair of dike wall failures. 20. The permittee shall comply with the attached US Coast Guard regulations. 21. The permittee understands and .agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal,. relocation; or other alteration; of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove,. relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. ~; ~j In addition, the permittee shall notify . ~ NOAA/NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE Chief Source Data Unit Attention: Sharon Tear N CS261 1315 E West HWY RM 7316 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 of Least two weeks prior to beginning work and upon completion of work. 22. The project will only be maintained for inlet stabilization purposes per the Inlet Management Plan (Section 1.4 of the Corps .EA). 23. The applicant will comply with all conditions of the 401 Water Quality Certification No. 3274, issued Apri130, 2001 and modified on June 27,.20.01 (Attachment 6 of the Corps' EA). 24. The applicant will comply with all conditions of the State Permit issued by NCDCM. C®AST ~LTAIt~ REG~JLA'~I®NS ~PPI,~CA~LE 'TO DODGE ~PE~q'I®1edS Below is a list of regulations which are applicable to dredge operations in the COTP Wilmington zone. This list is not all-inchisive. We encourage dredge companies to schedule a meeting with members of the USCG staff, in order to be provided amplifying information or answers to any questions that may exist. We also strongly encourage all Uninspected Towing Vessels (UTV) associated with each dredging operation to participate in the USCG's UTV Voluntary Commercial Dockside Examination program. Please contact LT Dave Brown of the USCG staff . at (910) 815-4895, extension 108, to coordinate a meeting or dockside exam. 1. Lights on dredge pipelines (33 CFR 88.15) 2. Lights on barges at a bank or dock (33 CFR 88.13) 3. Lights and Shapes (33 CFR 84.11-13) 4. Mooring Buoys (33 CFR 62.35) 5. Special Marks (33 CFR 62.31) 6. Uninspected Towing Vessel's (UTV) Licensing Requirements (46 CFR 15.910 & 15.815) 7. UTV Dnlg Testing Requirements (33 CFR 4.06 & 4.03-2) 8. UTV Marine Radar Requirement (33 CFR 164.01(b) & 164.72) 9. UTV Certificate of Documentation (33 CFR 173.21) 10. UTV Marine Casualty Reporting Criteria (46 CFR 4.05-1) 11. Dredge or UTV Advance Notice of Transfers (33 CFR 156.118) 5~ • • • 10/16/01 99-265 E4-Base Permil Mod.dwq (VIEW=HP2) s_ _ _. .,_ _ _. __- _ s~~ d - S. _ is ` ,-,r ~ ti , i _ ~: ... _ - ~ F - ' ~ eeyy~~ -- r a _ _ ~ ':!_' - - t r ~. ... _ ~~° ` Y e ; ~ to tl I ~,~ ~ t ~ y~C x~ ~ ''- 7 i , ~ ~'(i ,y' n i ~ ,~} r '_ ~~ ~~ c ' >.i s. ~ i c . h+ ~,- T `~: 1 E ~i' ° , 4t ,o-'~ ~ t -~. r_ `~,~Y ~ .r~'`,dfa e~Jt ~ °=A~1 ,;yyr,~~ nr z I ~ ~ ~~ ''~ i ~ r'1~~ ?~ ~~ ~ Si ~. ~,,, irrq,9 Wes, r r 7 ~ s -1 .~, ~ ~ ~ 1 1' ~<'"<~. _. w~,~„I , ~ ~-~ ~ _ s ~ ~~ ~; _,iMr '".ter 1d -~, ~ r- ,~s7 . +a ) ~ ~ ,~ ~~.` a~ x~ Y" i t'_ ~ " -~ ~ Ana i t ~b ~ `'~~.~' -H' Sale ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ,. ~ ~+ • 3 t ~ " •.~ ir.- h a ~ a, , f ~ 1 ~~ ,~ f`~a$m~Ts ~ ~ ~ 2 - v. n 9 ~ i, ., a ~"` ~. L..~a.ty ~jS~ 9 ~r ~ t ,. ~ ~ .~m~ ,: ~' s ~ ~,p,t fl~ ;4 4 ~ 1 ~ ,, - ~ ., 7~ o f ~ ~ _ 1 , II ~ ~~~ 7 o ~ "I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ a / I7 1 H O 1 1 _ ~. -r\ ~ i; _ i ~ ~ -`~--- t ,F r v, ,~ ~tx~'~ '~---3-- ~ .1~I~ y r ~5) .-x.. I ~ "`"~~ ' ~`~'~~ Figure 4-8 ~~~`. Proposed Project Plan View _ ~l~ra~recc~~erenae~ to Relocate Mason Inlet C~~ar~~i, ~iac: , (Aerial Photography Taken February' 998) (.;~,~;,~„»~e„G,l ~l:'a.,,„/%,.,C, sq W' l~ IF YOU NAVE Ai`JY QUESTIOt~tS OR ARE i~11SSING r1NY PAGES PLE,I.SE CALL (91.0) 341-7139 . fVEW HAN®VER COUNTY BOAR® ©F C~~/I~IIISS101VEfZS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 • Regular Item #: 9 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: DSS Presenter: Wayne Morris or Karen Vincent Contact: Karen Vincent SUBJECT`. Wheels to Work Program BRIEF SUMMARY: Work related transportation continues to be a major barrier for Work First clients: DSS staff has worked diligently to develop a Wheels to Work program which addresses this barrier for those for whom. public transportation is not an option. County Commission approval is needed to move forward with implementing the program. The County is asked to insure the success of this program by authorizing contributions of surplus County cars which may be roadworthy. The Board of Commissioners requested changes in the resolution to secure Board approval for all vehicles designated for use in this program. A list of such vehicles identified from the current surplus is attached for approval. • RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Recommend the Board of Commissioners provide staff authorization to implement the program anal adopt the resolution for the donation of selected surplus vehicles to Engin Angels for 8d Ce d/ist,-ribpution through the Wheels to Work Program. ~ I~st m vel~~c~o-.w.// hee ~resP~tead ~~~ (1' Q~ t Pr~vCt~- G~:O h e CCYp~ . FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: surplus.doc resolution.wp REVIEYVED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval. fig.,, - COMMISStONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS• COUNT( C4MM{5S{QN~~~ APPROVED REJECTL-D c REM4uCD ^ PCS T vNED HE,~,hD 13 PATE ail 0510 { ~ __ ~3 Surplus Vehicles Requested for New Hanover County's Wheels to Worlc. Program 1. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Vehicle # $960 2. 1992 GMC Jimmy Vehicle # 8971 3. 1991 Pontiac Grand Prix Vehicle # 897 4. 1992 Dodge Dynasty Vehicle # 8982 5. 1987 Chevrolet Caprice Vehicle ' 8984 6. 1988 Oldsmobile Royale. Vehicle # 8985 7. 1991 Ford Crown Victoria Vehicle from Environmental Mana,ement y 8. 1989 Chevrolet Station Wagon Vehicle from EMS ~ ~ .. .'I!.%.W ~ ~l .~ wc_w ~}*n A RESOLUTION OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County ,hereby resolves WHEREAS, transportation is a major barrier for Work First clients of the Department of . Social Services; and. WHEREAS,. existing public transportation is often insufficient to address the work and daycare needs of Work First individuals for whom the lack of adequate transportation poses a significant barrier to gainful employment; and' WHEREAS; the County desires to facilitate arrangements so as to assist non-profit group(s) in providing used donated vehicles to Work First clients; and WHEREAS, eligible Work First clients would sign promissory notes to cover the cost of insurance, car outfitting, title and tags; and WHEREAS, the County anticipates entering into an arrangement with Engine Angels, a non-profit corporation,. to receive, vehicle donations and convey title to eligible recipients, with Engine Angels and Cape Fear Community College performing necessary repairs; and WHEREAS, donation of reparable County surplus vehicles will promote program objective by helping build an inventory of vehicles for distribution. NO1IV, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board. of Commissioners of New Hanover County that reparable vehicles designated as surplus in the ordinary course of County disposition ofi personal property be made available without cost to Engine Angels. County staff is authorized to convey title upon securing the Board of Comrraissioners' authorization for disposition of specified vehicles. Following transfer, vehicles capable of being made operational in a cost efficient manner will be transferred to low income families in need of employment transportation. Should what was anticipated to be a "reparable" vehicle not be capable of being made operational in a cost efficient manner, the surplus vehicles may be sold by Engine Angels, with that non-profit retaining the proceeds for program purposes. Upon approval of the New Hanover County Property 'Management Director, surplus vehicles conveyed to Engine Angels may be stored on County property-until readied for distribution. This the day of November, 2001. . NEW HANOVER COUNTY [SEAL] Ted Davis, :Jr., Chairman ATTEST; Clerk to the Board NEIiV HANOVER COUNTY BOARS OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTIOiV Meeting Date: 10/15/01 Consent Item #: 3 Estimated Time: Department: DSS Presenter: Wayne Morris or Karen Vincent Contact: Karen Vincent SUBJECT: Wheels to Work Program a ~. BRIEF SUMMARY: Work related transportation continues to be a major barrier for Work First clients. Wheels to Work is a program designed to meet the needs of clients for whom public transportation is not an option. The program is dependent upon donations of used vehicles from individuals, businesses or government fleets. DSS staff have worked diligently to develop a program which meets such needs without unduly burdening county staff. County Commission approval is needed fio move forward with implementing the program. In addition, the County can insure the success of this program by authorizing contributions of surplus cars, which may be roadworthy. If approved, county staff will work collaboratively with an entity of the faith community to assume ownership of cars, ensure their roadworthiness, and make them available to Work First clients deemed appropriate for program participation. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend the Board of Commissioners provide staff authorization"to implement the program and approve the donation of selected surplus vehicles to Engine Angels for distribution through the Wheels to Work Program FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ' dssreso.wpd REVIEWED BY: ' LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: N/A HUMAN. RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMME__IVTS Postponed, Rescheduled ` ssrl~ner~sr.,for approval Change resolution to have specific cars /vehicles brought back to commx ~~~ ~~ before transfer. ~~°~ 9 `° !. ~~ 3 ~ 1 1 ~.i l~ ~~°°gg 1 ' r `y ~ i ' .,'rF~~ :~ r r». p J1 ~f l~u~t ~~~ ~ $ 3 "'G • A RESOLUTION OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County hereby resolves: WHEREAS, transportation is a .major barrier for Work First clients of the .Department of Social Services; and WHEREAS; existing public transportation is often insufficient to address the work: and daycare needs of ~'Vork First individua{s for whorm the lack of adeG~iate transportation poses a significant barrier to gainful employment; .and WI-IEREAS, the County desires to facilitate arrangements so as to assist non-profit group(s) in providing used donated vehicles to Work First clients: and _ WHEREAS, eligible Work First clients would. sign promissory notes to cover the cost of iris~irance, car outfitting, title and tags; and -WHEREAS, the County anticipates entering into an arrangement with Engine Angels, a non-profit corporation, to receive. vehicle donations and convey title to eligible recipients, .with Engine Angels and Cape Fear Community College performing necessary. repairs; and WHEREAS, donation of reparable County surplus vehicles will~promote program objective by heiping build an inventory of vehicles for distribution. NOW, THEREFORE, 13E.IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County that reparable vehicles designated as surplus in the ordinary course of County disposition of personal property be made available without cost to Engine Angels, with County staff authorized to convey title. Following transfer, vehicles capable of being made operational in a cost efficierif manner Vl,lil! be transferred to low~income families in need of employment Transportation. Should what was anticipated to be a "reparable" vehicle not be capable of being made operational in a cost efficient manner, the surplus vehicles may be sold by Engine Angels, with that non-profit retaining the proceeds for program purposes. Upon. approval of the New Hanover County Property Managemerit Director; surplus vehicles conveyed to Engine Angels `may be stored on County property until readied for distribution. T his the day of October, 2001. NEW HANOVER COUNTY . -. [SEAL] Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ..ATTEST:. Clerk to the. Board ~7 {This page intentionally left blank} ~~ r-, NEiN HANOVER COUNTY BOA~® OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Regular.Item.#: 11 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Health Presenter: David Rice, Health Director Contact: David Rice, Health Director SUBJECT: _ _ Public Health Surveillance of Bio-Terrorism BRIEF SUMMARY: David Rice will provide an update on the impact of bio-terrorism on public health in New Hanover County, and information on upcoming events to address issues of bio-terrorism. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear presentation FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: REVLEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE:. BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES:. N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AIVD ECOMMENDATIONS: .Hear presentation. No action required. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: l _ ~ ~o~n~~Y eOMMISSION~R APPROVED ^ REJECTED ^ REMOVED ^ PCS T PONED ©~ . H E.=, rR D E~/ ~% {This page intend®nally left blank} ~; ~~~~~~ ~.9~9~0 ~~;1 r i'~ ~ ( ~ F .~1 J • • • NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS .REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTLON - Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Additional=laem=.#c.- 1= Estimated Time:: Page Number: Department: County Manager Presenter: Contact: Allen O'Neal SUBJECT: j .Consideration of Approval of Resolution Declaring November 18th as Westfield Works Wonders Day - BRIEF SUMMARY: November 18th ,Westfield Shoppingtown will host Westfield Works Wonders, and annual corporate charity event to benefit and support over 54 local non-profit organizations. Last year -the event raised more than $5,7,000 for 45 participating charities. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Adopt resolution FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENT'S: ITEM-DOES NOT REQUIRE-REVIEW Cfl[iNTY CONiMiSSI01V~~~ APPROVED ^ REJECTED ~ ~ . REt~P,OVEG ^ DATE ,~ _ _ _ RESOLUTION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS, on November 18t", from 6 - 9 p.m., Westfield Shoppingtown Independence will host Westfield Works Wonders, an annual corporate charity event, and WHEREAS, last year nationwide 39 Westfield malls generated $1.6 million dollars for over 1,000 different non-profit organizations, and WHEREAS, last year locally over 45 charities participated and more than $57,000 was generated for non-profit organizations in the Wilmington area, and WHEREAS, New Hanover County is pleased to endorse Westfield Works Wonders as a charity (' extravaganza that will support over 54 local non-profit organizations, ~../ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that New Hanover County Commissioners do hereby proclaim November 18t", 2001 Westfield Works Wonders day in New Hanover County and salute the non-profit groups who participate to enhance their service to the entire community. Adopted this the St" day of November, 2001 ATTEST Ted Davis, 3r., Chairman ~~~,i . . . Lucie F.:Harrell;~~Clerk to the Board MEETING OF THE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT , ASSEMBLY ROOM, NEW HANOVER COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE 24 NORTH THIRD STREET, ROOM 301 WILMINGTON, NC November 5, 2001 ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Non-Agenda Items (limit to 3 minutes) 2. Approval of Minutes Adjourn • • PAGE NO. 71 73 71 (°1 {This page intentionally left blank} 7a NEW HANOVER COUNTY B®ARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . ~ Meeting Date: 11/05/®1 r Water & Sewer Item#: 1 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Governing Body Presenter: Lucie F. Harrell Cantact: Lucie F. Harrell ' SUBJECT: Water and Sewer Agenda -Approval of Minutes BRfEF SUMMARY: Approve minutes of the Regular Meeting held on October 1, 2001. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: FUNDING SOURCE: Approve minutes. ATTACHMENTS: 17EM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW • • 4 i I ~i~UIV ~ 1 C®IYIIV~I~p'Q'V~~~ . APPROVED L°ts~ 9tEJECTED ~G/'rH~CA I ~ I ~D ~. l~ fl`~1A~ €This page intentionally left blank} . •~:i .q ~~. ~~ ~.~.'~~ CONSENT AGENDA . NEW >EIANOVER COUNT' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - - November 5, 2001 ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE NO. 1. Approval of Minutes 77 2'. Approval of State Senior Center General Purpose Funds for Department of Aging 79 in the Amount of $11,364 and approval of Associated Budget Amendment #02- 0073 3. Approval of Payment of $24,500 to Town of Kure Beach for Beach Grass Planting 81 IC-~'"W~~ 4. Acceptance of Two (2) FEMA Fire Act Funding Awards to New Hanover County 85 ~~~® ',,,~ (~ Departments of Fire Services and Approval of BA #02-0071- 5. Approval of the Appointment of Edward Ruffin to the Region O Regional Aging 91 Advisory Council ` 6. Approval of Deaccession of Three Objects, Disposal of One Object 93 w 7. Approval of Proposed Budget for Grassroots Science Grant 103 , 8. Approval of Snows Cut Park Lease 107 Approval of Budget Amendments: - 9.1 #02-0074 Public Health/Child Care Health Consultant 109 9.2 #02-0075 Public Health/Teen Aids Prevention 110 9.3 #02-0076 Public Health/Maternal Outreach Worker 111. • 7s {This page intentionally left blank} 1~ NEW HANOVER COUNTI( BOAF~® OF COMMISSIOiVERS . ~ REQUEST FOR BOAR® ACTION Meeting ®ate: 11/®5/01 Consent Item #: 1 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Governing Body .Presenter: Lucie F. Harrell Contact:. Lucie F. Harrell -SUBJECT: Consent Agenda- Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approval of the following sets of minutes: Regular Meeting, October 15, 2001 Joint Meeting with Planning Board; September 20, 2001 Consolidation Work Session, October 15, 2001 Work Session on Water Treatment Facility, October 15, 2001 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REO_UESTED ACTIONS: Approve the minutes. FUNDING SOURCE: - ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIElN COUNT°~ MANAGER'S MENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve minutest---~ ~~ COMMISSIONERS' A T NS/COMMENTS: • ~flt~l~Tlf C©f~iMl ' OON APPROVED REJECTED REi'`~OVED p POSTPONED HEARD ~' o~~ SATE --~-----~ f-~-- 77 {This page intentionally left blank} ,~ r a~ ~ 4"~`'~ ~y ,-a i:J ~} tid.~il l+e~ l ~ 1.e ~~it .. ~1~~~ -- ~l~' • • • NEUV ~IANOVER COUNTY BOARD Of CONIMISSiONERS .REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 ,Consent Item #: 2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: .Aging Presenter: Contact: Annette Crumpton SUBJECT; . State Senior Center General Purpose Funds for Department of Aging in the Amount of X11,364. BRIEF SUMMARY: Each year the Department of Aging is eligible for Senior Center General Purpose funds. This year the funding award is $11,364. $6,329 was budgeted during the budget process for FY 2001.02. The budget amendment is for the difference. There are sufficient funds in the Senior Center's approved budget to cover the required 10 percent match. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: .Recommend acceptance of the grant; request authorization for the Chairman to sign the grant document; grid request approval of associated budget amendment #02-0073. FUNDING SOURCE: - State $11,364 ATTACHMENTS: ~:~ _~ , - ~;,: ba02-0073 REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COM I<!TS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approva COMMISSIONERS' ACTT NS~COMMENTS: ~flUNTY ~®fU1Ml ~ P®~9 ? "' APPROVED REJECTED ^ REi~OVED ^ POSTPONED ~IEARD ,",/~~ ~ A ~, ®e~l'~ ~~~t1a1O~. l~J ~9 NEVI NANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Budget Amendment ~o DEPARTMENT: Aging-Senior Center BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-0073 ADJUSTMENT DE61T State Senior Center Funds $5,035 Sa{arias CREDIT $5,035 EXPLANATION: To increase budget for State Senior Center General Purpose funds awarded to the Senior Center. The grant is for $11,364; $6,329 was budgeted during the budget process for fiscal year 2001-02. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners (-:.14~.1/1::~ ~ try '~i~.. ~ •j -. 1 ,,:, s ::~ _ NEVN HA(VO!/ER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMlSSlONERS ~' REQIdEST FOR BOARD ACTION . ~ Mee#ing Date: 11/05/01 . Consent Item #: 3 Estimated Time: Page Number: . Department: County~Manager Presenter: Dave Weaver , Contact: Dave Weaver SUBJECT: Approval of Payment of X24,500 to Town of Kure Beach for Beach Grass Ptanti:ng BRIEF SUMMARY: The .attached letter and supporting documents from the Town of Kure Beach outlines the Town's request for $24,500 from the Beach Nourishment portion of the Room Occupancy Tax Fund to pay for beach grass planting associated with the Town's beach nourishment project. The request complies with County policy and was recommended for approval by the Ports Waterway and Beach Commission. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: It is recommended that the Board grant the funding request. - FUNDING SOURCE: 210.410-5834-5810 - ATTACHMENTS: ~ . Letter from Kure Beach REVIEWED BY: - LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER' ENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approva COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: , OfltyNTY ~©MMI~ IONS ' APPROVED REJECTED ~ i REMOVED d PJ5TPONED CE HEARD ~ ~ ~ .~ p~~l« !~~~ of ~/ / , '" ,\ IVIr. Allen O'Neal, County 1Vlanager New Hanover County 320 Chestnut Street, Room. 501 Wilmington, N.C. 28401 Dear Nle. O'Neal: -~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ u ~ ; ~'i ` ` ', , ~ ~~ , n., - ~~: ~ ~ ~"~= ail __- .,., ., .».. r...-.,... .. _. September 24, 2001 On September 21, 2001, Tl1e Port, Waterway and Beach Commission met i,n rebular session. During tlae ~nee~ting, the Town of ~I~i~re Beach re,c~~~lested that funding of $24,500 for the completion of beach grass plantings lost during hurricane Fran be fiinded from the County Room OccL~pancy Ta°~ Fund. ~s bt cl<grU~.md, in :March. 2000, the ROT provided Rends to the Town ol~ Kure Beach to replant approximately 70"~~ of the beach grasses lost to hurricane Fran. The balance of the replanting project taad been irate rationally postponed due to beach erosion. u~~til after the Town received their next scheduled reno~urisla~~nent in the spring of 2001. That was co3mpleted this past ;Tune. ~~ttaci~~ed is a copy of their re~~uest and supporting docun3ents. Tl~e PWB Commission me~~ib~rs reviewed the material and unanimously endorsed that it be forwarded to the CoLn~+ty Cornn7issioners for consideration and app.rovai~, ,- r''~Y 'Very trulv,~~urs, ,~ , %~ ~/ ,/ Richard Catlinl~.Ch~iran Attachments cc: Dave ~Jeaver, Coeinty Finance Office 414 Chestnut Strut V+Tilmingto.n, N.C. 28401 ~M~ayor Betty L. Medlin 117 Settlers :Lane .~ :`~Kure:Beacil; N.C. 28449 ,,,,~~ . , ;1~~; ~ .. ONe~lltr. A :v' •~a a .. Sa r 3. ~...''e ~a~_. ='.:d'4'"f_E...~.. ~~5:~ ~g 3~S~.~C~ CE;r~~~_'t~J~1~'idg~..,_~8'~, y f'~_.e ~ i ~"a $.,~s . -a +... ~i_1a s~ ~.~`r~.u ~ ~ i° ii~l ,.+r^.. ti~~"~i~ x~ °~;, -,R"~' . ~.~~e,. ~~w,:~~'T~=.~„~':~:~" "". "A"~~.3x~ ,mow ~.';~,~..~s.~.r~d~~~„~°„"'. ~a,s:~„~ ~:~~ • `TOW~j OF KLIRE BEACH 4527563 P.03 ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ccr15 ugNt • rvs r Urt-IC;~ aVX 3 • KURE 6~AGH, NC7RTH CARQUNA 28448 T~LEPHQN6 (910) x+56-8216 - F,4X (910) 458-7421 September 21, 2Q01 i~1r. Richard Catlin,. Chairman Port, Waterway and Beach Commisian cfo Richard Catlin and Associates- 220 Old ®airy Road V1lilmington, PV.C. 28405 bear i1~r. Catlin: • SEP-24-1901 06 OS FROM G,M.O6.lEN TAX SERVICE TO In March 2000, the Town of Kure Beach received reimbursement from the Gounty Room Occupancy Tax Fund of X185,751 for repairs from Hurricane Floyd damage. A portion of these funds were used to partially replant beach grass that had been overwashed and destrayed by the storm surge. The ropianting was limited to a width orf 50 feet versus the Corps original planting design ire 1998 of ?0 feet. It was planned to add the balance of 20 feet after the next renourishment in 2001. The renourishment of 2001. was campieted in ,1unc. We have again negotiafied an agreement with the contractor used by the Corps in-the initial planting to complete the replanting according to the original specicifirations. !t is estimated that an_ additional. 7 acres of beach grass plantings will be needed at a cost of $3.500 per acre far a total cost of $24,500. The unit cost is competitive with the rariginaP Corps contract. . Attached is a cnpy of the Town°s letter of tl~arch 27, 2®®0 which requested the aid after Hurricane Floyd and a map of the Corps Beach Grass Planting .design. We would appreciate the Cor~`~r~issioF~'s c~nsid~ratiao~ S'ar ;u~ding t ~: peach grass project of $24,500 front the County ROT Fund. 10ery truly yours, ~' /~~~.~ etty ~. edl~n, IVlayar PWP809011GIi~0 ~3 Received Sep-24-O1 11,58am From-910 458 2598 To-CATLJN ENGINEERS AND Page 03 SEP-24-1901 1~6~05 FROM G.M.O~JEN TRX SERVICE TO `TOWJ~j OF KURE BEACH 452'7563 P . 04 .~ , ~;-= G.~ 117 SETTLERS LANE • POST OFFICE BOX 3 •KURE 9EACH, NORTH CAROLINA 28adg TELEPHONE (9t0? 458.8216 • FAX (910) 458-7a21 IViarch 27, 200CD Mr. Richard Catlin, Chairman Port, Waterway and Beach Commission civ Richard Catlin and Associates 220 O!d Dairy Road Wilmington, N.C. 28405 Dear t\llr. Catlin: ®n ~eptamber 30, 9 999 the Town of Kure Beach presented estimates to the Port. Waterway and beach Cc~lvtmission of Hurricane Floyd damage tee beach - s4ructures totalling X268,470. After competitive bidding of the projects, the ciamagv ass®ssmvnt was reduced to $205,531 and an update was provided io the Commission on February 1; 2000. 1IVe have submitted appropriate claims to FEfUTA and our insurance carrier, Our insurance carrier has reimbursed the Town $19,750 for work on the .beach accesses, FEtt,9R has denied reimbursement for emergency beach bul9dozing and dune grassing and has delay®d final rulings pending our appeals on sand fencing repairs, storm water outfall repairs and signage replacement, Our discussions. with ~EMA representatives load us to believe that we aril! not receive favorable ;rulings on the outstanding items. . Based can 4hdse findings, we request that the Carn~nis~ion endorse a request for reimbursement of up to ~155,781 from the Room fJccupancy Tax Fund. As with Hurrican® ®onnie, we wi19 submit expenditure documents to the County Finance Office to apply for reimbursment and any expenditure requests will be reduced should F~1MA elect to honor any of our pending claims. Attached is an updated damage. assessment fist of items that are. currently under repair or hav® been completed, We appreciate the Commission's consideration of this request for RC1T reimbursement funding and are prepared to provide additions! support information. Ve truly yours Betty t_. (Medlin, M yor G~Owen/Fioyd-C19 ~~` ,J R®ceived Sep-24-O1 11:58am From-910 458 8598 To-CATLIN ENGINEERS AND Page 04 .t. s ~ NEW HA~VOVER C®UIVTY B®AR® OF COMMISSI~JNERS REQUEST.FOR BOARD ACT10N • Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Consent Item #: 4 Estimated Time: Page,Number: Department:-Fire Services Presenter: Donnie Hall . Contact: Donnie Hall SUBJECT: Acceptance of Two (2) FEMA Fire Act Funding Awards totaling $56,000 to New - Hanover County Department of Fire Services.. BRIEF SUMMARY: On December 15, 2000, Congress appropriated .100 million dollars to the Firefighter Investment 'and Response Act, to be disbursed by September 30, 2001. The Board of Fire Commissioners .supported an application for Fire Prevention and Health and Wellness and set aside funds in the Department's Administrative Reserve. The Fire Prevention- program proposes public service messages be delivered through the local _ media that, a smoke detector. program be initiated. The public service messages would address - fire safety es well as severe weather preparedness information. The smoke detector distribution would target, the two groups of citizens most likely to be injured.by fire, those age 65 and older and age 14 and younger. This program would not only include installation, but the monitoring to insure .that the detectors were tested and kept operational. Our share of this program .is . $9,000..00; federal funding is $21,000. The second program is directed. to the Health and Wellness of all our County's firefighters, • volunteer and career. - The program will:. -x educate fire service personnel in areas such as diet, fitness, and injury prevention. x' develop a physical fitness program and acquire cardiovascular exercise equipment to be placed within the County fire stations that have 24-hour staffing. ~{ include monitoring firefighter health in order to promote a .healthier lifestyle. `provide ah employee assistance program. 'include a smoking and tobacco use cessation program. NHC Fire's share of this program is ,$15,000.00; federal funding is $35,000. - - _ RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: • Recommend that the County Commissioners accept .the two grants with match funding as identified and approve related budget amendment #02-0071. Request authorization for the County Manager to sign the grant documents. FUNDING SOURCE: Federal $56,000 ~~~~ e©fl~Mle~IONFR~ , Fire Services Adm. Reserve $24,000 APPROVED ATTACHMENTS; REJECTED 0, REnlIOVED d - POSTPONED Ba oz-oo~i. ` HEARD p SATE '~ O~.n l_ _. REVIEWED $Y: •LEGAL: - FINANCE: Approve BUDGET:. HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: As recommended above, COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ; tVEyU HANOVEI~ COU(VTY BOARD OF COI~IIUIISSIOfVERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION „ Meeting Date: 1110510'1 Budge# Arnendrnen# DEPARTMENT: Fire Services BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-0071 ADJUSTMENT DEBIT CREDIT FEMA Fire Act Grants $56,000 • Administrative Reserve $56,000 EKPLANATION: To increase budget for two (2) grants awarded to Fire Services by FEMA for Fire Prevention and Health and Wellness. The County's match of $24,000 is already in this fiscal year's budget. Funds will be budgeted in specific ex ~dt. re accounts as the programs are developed. ADDITIONAL INFORI`JIATiON: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners x ~~, ~, ~ . ~~;~' . ~, ~;gir;r _ ~~4. _ ,r ~ .. n _. ;J S4 RECEIV~O ~~~ ~ ~ 2D01 • 4~ NgG~n- w ~, . a ~ Federal Emergency Mana~e~en~ Agency `~y~, ~ Washington, D.C. 20472 a~ Donnie 1-Iall, Chief` New Hanover. County Fire Services 414 Chestnut Street, Room 307 Wilmington, North Carolina 28401--4072 Spa `~ '~~l ~Re: Grant Rio. ~l~iW-2001-~'G-05005 :Dear Chief Hall: • • Congratulations, your grant applicationsubmitted under FEiV1A's Assistance to Firefighters Grant ProsTram for a wellness and fitness program has been approved. The approved project costs amount to 550,000. Seventy percent (or $3,000) of the approved amount ~is the Federal share and 30 percent (or. S 1 ~,OOi~) is your share o t the costs. Enclosed with this award letter, you will Find FEMA's grant agreement articles. Please make sure you read and understand the articles as they outline .the terms and conditions related~with your ~ ant award. ti(aintain a copy of these documents for your official tiles. You establish acceptance of these grant a;~reement articles r;vhen you expend any~of the grant funds available to you. Grant payments under the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program are made on a reimbursable.or an immediate-needs basis. When you need a.draw from your grant funds, lill out the attached-Request for ~dvarice yr Reimbursement (Standard Form 270) and send it to us at the address listed below. In order to speed up the payment process, yo ii also have he~ option of sending the request via fax at 202-646-384f~. We will initiate the payment ~,vith the taxed copy but you must also send us the original, signed copy to us at the address provided below: Each request for payment must be made by u~.ing this form, i.e., SF-270. Send all grant payment documents to: - Federal Emergency Management Agency Financial & Acquisitiori Management Division Grants Management Branch X00 C Street, SW, Room 3~0 . Washington, DC 20472 Attn: Sylvia A. Carroll ~~ If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Tom Hamngton at 202-b46-33Sb. Sincerely, ~. «~U ~~ atncia A. English Senior Procurement Executive Administration and Resource Planning Directorate Enclosures: FENIA Form 76-10A Agreement Articles Checklist Standard Form 270 Standard Form 1199A, if applicable r; ~C~ - RECEIVED SAP j ~ 2aQ~ v Federal Fmerben~y 1Vlanagen~.en~ Abency Washington, D.C. 20472 Chief Donnie HaII New Hanover County Fire Services SFP 414 Chestnut Street, Room 307 ~ ~ ~ ~~~;~ ' Wilmington, N.C ?$=X01-=I072 Ri: Grant iV'o. EitittiV-2001-FC-0~00~ Dear Chief I-Tall: Congratulations, vour grant application submitted under FEi~1A's assistance. to Firefighters Grant Program for Fire Prevention Programs has been approved. The approved project costs amount to 530,000.00. The Federal share is $? 1,000.00 and your share of the costs is 59,000.00. Enclosed with this award letter, you will'tind FEN1A's grant agreement articles. Please make sure you read and t:nderstand the articles as they outline the terms and conditions related with yo~ir grant award. ctilaintain a copy of these documents for your official tiles. You establish .acceptance of these.,grant agreement articles when you expend any of the grant funds available to you. I want to call your attention to Article XI that refers to ONIB Circular A-110, Part 43 and ;ood procurement practices. The Federal guidance states "A11.proeurement transactions shall be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and .tree competition." (n ~Teneral. +~ettin~~ two or more bids is seen as a good practice when making substantial purchases. Grant payments under the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program are made on a reimbursable or an immediate-needs basis. W"hen you need a draw from your grant funds, fill out the attached Request for Advance ~or Reimbursement (Standard Form 270) and send it to us ~~t the address listed below. In order to speed up the payment process, you also have the option of sending the request via Fax at 202-646-346. We will initiate the payment with the faxed copy but you must also send us the original, signed copy at the address provided below, Each request for pa,. meat must be made by using this form. If ; ou have not already done so, please submit a signed 1 199x, Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form, to the address below. fiend all ;rant payment documents to: Federal Emergency Management A~~ency Financial & Acquisition vlanagement Division Grants Management Branch X00 C Street,SW, Room 3~0 Washington, DC 20472 , 4 Attn; Svlvia :=~. Carroll ~"9 If you have anv questions or need additional information, please call Lisa Lewis at (202) 6~6- =1~72. Sincerely, Patricia A. English Senior Procurement Executive Administration and Resource Planning Directorate Enclosures: FEIVIA Form 76-10A Agreement Articles Checklist Standard Form .270 ' Standard Form 1 199A, if applicable ~, !`1 qo NEW F~ANOVER COI~NTY BOAR® OF COMIIIIISSIOIVERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION " Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Consent Item #: 5 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Governing Body Presenter: Lucie Harrell Contact: Annette Crumptori . SUBJECT:. Approve the Appointment of Edward Ruffin to the- Region 0 Regional Aging Advisory Council " BRIEF SUMMARY: A vacancy has occurred on the Aging Advisory Council and Annette Crumpton, Director of the Department of Aging, has recommended the Commissioners appoint Mr. Edward Ruffin. ~. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: -' Appoint Edward Ruffin to the Regional Aging Advisory Council. FUNDING SOURCE: n/a ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Annette Crumpton ` gTEA9 DOES NOT REQUIRE REVlEi/V COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: As vacancies occur with this Council, this is the normal appointment process used in the pa ." \ COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~~~~ ~0~~I~; I~IV~ e I~PPR04~~"` . REJECT w r REMO'~"::~ ~. POSTPG;v,~p [] (HEARD ~~T~ ~~ o~ ~l Ai'vNETTE CRUVIYTON Director October 15, 20U 1 1`+1~ ~'i' ~l`V~~ ~ ~Jl~l ~L DEPARTMENT OF AGING 2222 SOUTH COLLEGE ROAD WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 TELEPHONE (910) 452-6900 Faz (910) 452-6411 Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman New Hanover Countti~ Board of Commissions 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401 Dear Chairman Davis: The Area Agency on Aging Administrator has informed me that New Hanover County has a vacancy~seat on the Region O Regional Aging Advisory Council. Membership on the Council comes through an official appointment of the New Hanover Board of Commissions.. The Council is composed of representatives . from four counties: Brunswick, Columbus. New Hanover. and Pender. The Council meets quarterly at the Senior Center on College Road. ' The following individual has demonstrated leadership and interest in working with the Regional Aging Advisory Council and is recommended for your consideration. Edward Ruffin 3930 Echo Farms Blvd. yt~'ilmington, NC 28412 Mr. Ruffin spent 21 years in the Air Force serving lus country-, upon retirement 11 years ago, he moved to Wilmington. He is a member of the Air Force Sergeartt's Association. Mr. Ruffin has a sincere love for lus fellowman and volunteers with several comrntuity agencies. He and lis wife are volunteers for New Hanover Regional and Cape Fear Hospitals. Ed has been a Home Delivered i'Vleals volunteer driver for 6 nears. I would appreciate consideration of the New Hanover County Board of Commission in the appointment of Mr. Edward Ruffin to ttie Region O Area Agency on Aging Advisory Council. Please contact me at =I52-6=100 if you have questions. Sincerely, `i1 C~ ~~„~;~ -f~~,~v~-~ Annette Cnmlpton NHC Department of Aging ,;, ~, . . ~.. ~' 6(1y~!9~, Z T~ . ~u~ r'~ P ~~~ . F4~ __ .s.~ ~_~~CfM~ OCT 7 6 ~~,r;, NEW kANOVER CO BD OF C~Mh11SS10NERS ~l ,~ • i NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF~CO'MMiSSiONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTIOiV Meeting ®ate: 11/05/01 ' Consent Item #: 6 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Museum Presenter: Contact: Ruth Haas SUBJECT: Dearcession Three Objects; Dispose of One Object BRIEF SUMMARY: ' The CFM Board of Directors upon the recommendation of staff, recommend that objects previously accessioned and stored in the basement storage unit of the Library are no longer appropriate for the permanent collection objects are: ® 1982.93.93 Two cardboard boxes of artillery shell fragments from the Fort Fisher bombardments of December 1864 and January 1865. Many pieces are rusted.. We have better specimens in our permanent collection. Fort Fisher is not interested in them. ® 1987:29:36 Circa 1900 cotton bale; Dunn, NC tag; Coastline Convention Center warehouse. We have another bale in the collection that is'on exhibit. This is a large item that requires storage space .that we do not have. ® 1987.84.1-.32;..34-.37 Group of interior architectural elements: baseboards, moldings, doors, lintels, chair rails, windows, mantle, etc. Circa 1804.40. From St. John's Lodge. Wood is worn with some breakage. Cost to restore is high and there are no plans to exhibit. ® An over-sized quilt used as a prop for the movie Cat's Eye, was formerly deaccessioned with a recommendation to sell. No action .was taken. The object is infested with silverfish and shows signs of mold. !t is too heavy to manually carry up .the stairs and will not fit into the library freight elevator. Attempts to find anyone interested in salvaging have been unsuccessful. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend deaccession of the three objects currently included part of the permanent collection. Subser~uently deal with each as follows: s . Artillery steel! fragments: Recycle within museum operations. Use volunteer Community, Service assistance to remove rust and seal fragments. Use for educational and .promotional purposes such as gift items for schools or discovery kits. ~ Cotton bale: Advertise through museum publications to determine if another museum wishes to acquire. If no interest, dispose of item. ~ Architectural Elements: ~ Dohate to the recycle program of Historic Wilmington Foundation. ® Quilt: Use whatever means are necessary to remove and dispose of the quilt. FUNDING SOURCE: Costs associated with disposal of any items would be absorbed by the Museum operafing budget for FY O l -02. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of deaccession forms REVIEWED BY: ` LEGAL: N/A FINANCE As recommended a GFN WRlF~ V. W/V~RYY~4 ~~~4a\~, BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES:,Nr/rA"'~+f =:Q ;-' RE,. _.....,~ d AND RECOMMENDATPONSs ~,~ ~ ~ ~ RG.... , ~+~:ED O ~MMENTS: HE1~RD tl ORTE _.,...,.L:~:~,.r..~.... G3 Artifact number .~„i ~z~ ~~ ter' =~' ? I -, Artifact tine i ' ~~ ~ l l` t tu'; 1 Provenance L,~ .T. r, j Gr w~- - r,?c~(r ~=~ ~"~"-'~tL~, ,;=~ ~~°~~ - ~, c~ ,,j~~ ~1 Condition G1?~'L a~"~~ °; r'c:<' ~ ~ "r/ ~ ="''`~l Curator's Recommendation " Reason for deaccession/disposition: '/poor/deteriorated _ undocumented _ reproduction/not authentic _ not from LCF region _ other Transfer to: _CFM Exhibits -CFM Demonstration Collection _ CFM Library _ other Disposition:. t~sale _ destruction _ exchange other institution _ - 4 ~ i r ~ ~ ( Signature ~ ~~ -j~~~:~`;~' ,/~ .. c~~:'"du~ date ~-a'T-. ~ ~ Zo4~ 1 ~~~ f~~~l,;; :a :~eS~t- ~-X~~~k.~;;1c'-` -(r,,~ L~~-cwu C, r(~'c h~,~.i ®~rector's Recommendation ~% ,;~--~V- -;~ ; .-~. , ~~~, ~ ; ~J ~= ~ J ~ ?,~, ;,i 'f-~. / / (~' Ci:ii/~-~ Y ~ c' Y -, Vic' ~~l 16f !/.:y°~;rn• ?Ural"(Ci,2 ~7d1~ . _ approved _ approved with the following changes fi`"--v ~, ,,, ~,-~-~- i" _ disapprove ,.._, Signature _~y`:~., <; '' , ~, ~~ l date ^,..~y,a2( ,,,~ ~ Collections Committee Recommendation approved _ approved with the following changes -disapproved - - ~~./ _ disapproved _ Si nature of chairman { r l , ,_,,_._; . g ~~,,~....:...~a.__...~-.~.....,._, , r „~.<,,^ ;~ ,. date i '°~ ~* r, G\PM a\COLLEC?\DEACFORM. PM4 71(94 Board of Trustees C~ecision approved~;with"recommendaton by Collections Committee _ approved with the following changes - :CAPE FEAR MUSEUM . `' - Pale 1 OBJECT. RECORD ' - 09~12~?ooi Object #- 198?.093.0093 ~ Category/ ToolsJEgui~a-~ci/~'e Parts- Pieces. Class/ Armament Obj. Date`,- 18&5 Narne(NOM) Shell, Artil9err Titles= ~•Descrip.C°~ ,Shell, Artiitery, fragments, approximately 60, cast iron. Prom various sine steel{s, including 15", 11", 9" balls, 100 & Z00 1b. pro~ectiies, 1.0 iron balls (Grapeshot). Materialx Gondition/ Donors NB3JVNANGVEI::C®4JIV~ --OO~yN~BDILf311VG Dim. Dim: ' Artist/Maker , tccations 800 Conserv. / . Proves 1=ragr~aents from expl®ding shells fired at P®rt Pisher, during bom&~ardmesats, 12-186 ~ 1-186. Photo> Negatives Slide;- Add Bys C~3NV ~ 0 7/1 711 995 Change / / Cat By/ / / . . Notesf°~~ 9s Provenance ~1 i %? V~ /~'~~%' ~C[ C, ~.C-,Lfcr-l ~a~ 1.~' l~%'hI'~LV''l;/ ~G"Y7 ~?,Yj-Lf,-C-. LL'~~-Ce'-- ~G~'~~~%. ~ ~ Condition Lzj~%c% '~ -~,,~ C'~~:' ~~~ t1 Curator's Recommendation Reason for deaccession/disposition: _ poor/deteriorated _ undocumented _ reproduction/not authentic _ not from LCF region other !2 ~ ~'f')~ 4~. ~ ~° Ya' ~'i1~ ~ y1 c2 ;'~ ~!~ C'Yie. G~-7 Cif ~Lj ~!~; '7t" L / Transfer to: CFM Exhibits CFM Demonstration Collection _ CFM Library _ other ®isposition: /~sale _ destruction -exchange other institution i =~ G~%c'! Signature ~~~ ~'' date -^'=%~~ ~ ~~ `' ~IreCtor'S tteCOmmendatlOn ~2 ar.~=.~ ;`<,, /t1':- iliv~zvtivl o~F `j-"=Nv'CS-f"v<4 ~/f ,;% ('"~' Ga,'1{:C"Y~ j"1 5 ~ ~iKi' ,~ iYI t'2L ~''~ 'L~L')'/i ~J~'t7 /!L. is ~tJ ~Yr approved _ approved with the following changes - ~'~t-~-I~f~;.~ _ disapprove ~~~ d~'~r~a~C. Signature date ;~~ ~;;'~ ~v''~ Collections committee Recommendation -disapproved Board of trustees ~3ecision approved with recommendation by Collections Committee _ approved with the following changes _~i pproved Signature of chairman ~~; ~~,, ,' ~ . ;:;~t"- `;' date ,~ ~' `=;-~'~~ C:\PM 4\COL~ECT\DEACfORM. PM4 11/94 Artifact number /~~ ~~~ - Z'`l ~~ ~% Artifact title r,"'a ~~yL i'~~~~~~ ~~. l 1Gc~ approved _ approved with the following changes • CAPE FEAR MUSEUM Page 1 ' OBJECT RECORD 09/13/2001 Object #;~ 1987.029.0035 Category/ ..Distribution 8< Parts- Pieces: C1ass/ Container • Obj. DateY 1900 Name(NOM) Bate, Cotton Titlef~ Descrip.~ Baie, Cotton (3); compressed w/ burlap covering bound w/wire and/o r metal bands. Ntateriaix Condition/ DonorY lJVR9GtiTTH©M,4SH.JR. Dim. " HT: 1,43cm UVD: 125cm DP: 74cm Dim. HT: 55.3420" V-ID: 49.2500" DP: 29.1560" Artist/Make~ Locations 700 Conserv./ P~ov~ ,Photo: iVegative~ Slider Add By:~ CC3NW 07/17/1995 Change TSB 09/30/1998' Cat By/ ! ! Notes[ "S" deacce~sioned on December 12, 1995. • 97 HTilldl,l II~a7eti..r~i r ~ - , - • •• ••••••..• •••~•. j7 >~ /~~:; 2Y'C~ ~ IJ/(1IC~( )CG/ ~ G~. G'(.~1'S r// .I !c ~S n C, f ' /~~/Ir.` it ~l.~~~ll Y.:! r I ~J ~ CC~~I ~ / /"1--''",rC c' '~'"G'.- i'rOVerianc_ .,17 - , I~ 1LG7 5 c,- I ~- ~. ~ ?C"IJG:-'S //,' .: t Condltlora /'y'~~' J i'? - 5 z''-C. ,~) :~%2 =~ G'C'~G>~' C~. /7 C /r G1 Curator's Recommendatiary . Reason for deaccession/disposition: -poor/deteriorated _ undocumented _ reproduction/not authentic. _ not from LCF region ~ other /'1 i;' ,`~~~--~~/ ~ r ~'`'' !'Z(" G'?1 / l h'. G / `~~ ~ Transfer to: _CFM Exhibits _CFM Demonstration Collection _ CFM Library -. other Dispasition: _ sale ____ destruction _ exchange -other institution ~,i^f~,~,~.. C~~l 1<-te-~,z~,~--r~, ~ ~2•~I ~l„2 f~ ,~-I ~fi-- ~ "vu., ~ ,,~~ ,:~~c~ ~- ,- ,~ , , ,r,-, ? Signature ! ~.-~i- /> 1,`~i•~~ G~ - ~=G,-l~~'-- date `=~~~''f i3 i_~c,:: i Directar s ~Ze~ommeadation i_~~pproved -approved with the following changes ~ ~ -~ disapprove Signature :,%r GC--~ ~~' ~ „~,~;.~=' date o~ .,~- ~%`z1-, ?. ./ , , Collections Committee Recommendat'!on approved approved with the following changesdisapproved i8oard of Traastees Decision approved with recommendation by Collections Committee _ approved with the following changes i proved v~`~.~ ,., ~,. ~ < ~. Signature of chairman ~~ ~ _-~~ 17 `~{"`~~' ~~% date >~~%---~--~' C:\PM 4\COLLECTDEACFORM. PMa 1 ~/9a GAPE FEAR MUSEUM OBJECT RECORD Object #- 1987.084.0001 Category/ Parts- Pieces: Class/ Obj. Date- 0 ~ Name(NOM} Titled Descrip.~ l~nknown artifact. Page 1 09/13/2001 Materials Condition/ Donors ST30HNSMUSEtJMOFART Dim. Dim. Artist/Maker Locations 0 Conserv./ Proves PhotoY Negatived Slide- Add By- CON!/ 07/17/1995 Change TiM 12/201.1997 Cat By/ / / Notes Window holder keq~t in °'parts°' box in Registration area.. Supplemental: LJCATiON: LOCAT30N ENTERED 13Y REASON BEGItV DATE ENL3 ®ATE 0 /l Jl • 99 Provenance ~. ~"~~ i)! ~)~~n, ~`c- -,fir ~~1~~ d ;;~ G~'i /gal ; e~c j~,~i ,ar'/~~~,~'- ~iZ, o°G' ~a~ ~~rl ~ri~~ /S ,~ ~r;l, v- i Curator's Recommendation Reason for deaccession/disposition: ,poor/deteriorated _ undocumented _ reproduction/not authentic _ not from LCF region L~other ~~'~~ !~lY~ ~ • ~-2/~!~ lrN'vE'r' .~~~ ivl'~,~,~~y Transfer to: CFM Exhibits _CFM Demonstration Collection _ CFM Library _ other Disposition: /sale _. destruction _ exchange other institution r ~_ _ Signature / ~31;~.r~%71Y=~~/c~-- ~~. f ~~'wk=- date ~~,%<j, G' ~J`/~ l Director's Recommendation approved _ approved with the following changes Signature disapprove date °: ~.~. r: - ~%~ Collections Committee Recommendation approved _ approved with the following changes -disapproved ~ / Signature of chairman ~~ -~-,,,,, ~r: "~ r4 ~•.'~--- date / ~'. ! `~:"'~ Board of Trustees Decision `' approved with recommendation by Collections Committee _ approved with the r'ollowing changes 1®-8- disapproved Signature of chairman date ~~? ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ C:\PM 4\COLLECTDEACFORM. PM4 1 7/94 ~, l Artifact number p~~v ~~;~~~• ~ - %„ G ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~.,~ ~~ ~ i f ` ~ , _ - ~~, ~ ~ Artifact title ~~ -' ~ i~~ ,, c-~ ;..-~, ~~~`,~~, ~ Cc ~~~ ~ ~;,~> . , Discussion was held at October 2001 Board of Trustees Meeting on the disposition of the quilt. Because.of the quilt's condition and size permission was requested to take into consideration for disposal. This recommendation was approved by the Board. r-~ {This page intentionally left blank} 102 !`1 ^J • NEW HAN®VER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Consent Item #: 7 Estimated. Time: Page Number: Department: Museum Presenter: Contact: Ruth Haas • SUBJECT': Proposed Budget for Grassroots Science Grant BRIEF SUMMARY: As part of a North Carolina Consortium of Museums committed to improving science education, Cape. Fear Museum will receive approximately $200,000 this year in support of science education. [ As of .last week, our allocation was. calculated at $209,018; even with a potential 4% cut, sufficient money has been allocated for this proposed budget.] The Grassroots Science funds maintain the on-site and outreach museum science programs including salaries, benefits and training -for two science educators; all costs for Saturday and. summer science camp programs; Star Lab outreach service to all third graders in NHC; What's In Your Backyard taught to second and third grades at~the museum;. Pi Day and Spring Science.Spectacular events, which each provided science education programs for 1,000 participants for last year. Four new initiatives are proposed for funding this year to include: 1. Full funding for receptionist/reservations position to support general museum operations; 2. Up to $30,000 to work with consultants to upgrade and expand long-term exhibits with a focus on integrating the history and science stories of the tower Cape Fear; 3. Offering an adult-focused science education program particularly designed to address teacher training and raise awareness of scientific topics relevant to the "history, science and culture of the Cape Fear region." 4. Funding the costs for camp teachers- and a science intern from Grassroots Science with the request that traditional dollars provided by Cape Fear Museum Associates be applied to history-focused projects. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend approval of the proposed budget for the Grassroots Science Grant as attached. Recommend acceptance of Grassroots Science Grant when awarded and request approval of, .necessary budget amendment. FUNDING SOURCE: North Carolina state budget, Grassroots Science Consortium grant • ATTACHMENTS: Grassroots Science Bud HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A 00lfS~tY ~~~~~~l~,~j~~I~R~ , ARpROVE{ ~EJECT,~'' , ~tEMOVEIr~ ~: 4 P~STPO~!`~ ~ 1 X03 HERRD ®IRTE ~1~~~1 dl..._ REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET Grassroots Science Budget 2001-2002 Considerations REVENUE GENERATED ®bject Description 2000-1 2001-2 9109 Administrative Reserve $298,988 $300,000 3294 Appropriation $203,000 ($209,018) EXPENDITURES 1050 ~ Temp Salaries - 3 FT/Temporary $ 52,310 $ 88;643 Science Educator (80 hours x 26 pp x $19.04) $39,604 Assistant Science Educator $28,280 (80 hours x 19 pp x $13.41) (80 hours x 7 pp x $14.10) Reservations/Reception $20,759 ~ (80 hours x 26 pp x $9.98) Increase due to Count- wide grade & salary adjustments and adding one full-time/temporary reservations/reception staff 2100 FICA -for 3 FT/Temporary $ 4,014 $ 6,702 (.0756 x 88,643) 2300 Medical Insurance -for 3 FT/Temporary $ 9;651 $ 12,774 Medical $4,008 /year / person x 3 $12;024 Dental $250 /year/ person x 3 $ 750 2310 Disability Insurance -for 3 FT/'T'emporary ' $ 80 $ 160 Science Educator (39,604/100 x .18) $ 71 Asst. Science Educator (28,280/100 x .18) $ 51 Reservations/Reception (20,7591100 x .18) $ 38 PERS®NNEL T®TAL ~ b6,05~ $108,279 3600 Advertising: $ 15,903 $ 15,500 Print ~ $ 11,000 General Museum $5,000 PI-Day $1,500 S3 $1,500 Cape Fear Experience $1,500 Family Science Saturday $1,500 Electronic Media $ 4,500 PI-Day $1,500 S3 $1,500 Cape Fear Experience $1,500 Added funding for Cape Fear Experience; reduced overall funding. 3700 Contracted Services: $ 4,825 $ 39,350 Science Honoraria $ 1,000 1 Science Intern ($8/hr x 40 hrs/wk x 10 wks) $ 3,200 2 Camp Teachers @ $1,500 $ 3,000 5 Camp Scholarships @ $60 $ 300 S3: $ 1,150 Tents $600 Port-a-Johns $125. Fossil Load $325 PCS _ ~, 'S`ecurity $100 PI-Day S curity $ 100 Cape Fear~E~perience Security $ .100 Exhibit Taxidermy $ _ 500 Assess & recommend exhibit upgrades $30,000 1. ~~~~ Increases to addition of camp teachers, science intern, Cape Fear • ~~ti~ Experience ,and exhibit upgrades assessment. l 10/22/2001 rah 3820 Postage: *$50/month $ _ ----- $ 600 Increase moves costs of distributing science materials to science funds. 4100 Printing: $ 1,560 $ 3,200 YVhat's In Your Backyard docent packets $ 200 PI-Day Stickers, Fliers & Uniforms $1,000 S3 Stickers, Fliers & Uniforms $1,000 Cape Fear Experience Promotions $1,000 Discovery Gallery new tour material $ 200 Increases due to real costs of materials, new program & Cape Fear ' Experience 421.0 ' Supplies: $ 9,236 $ 11,592 What's In Your Backyard? $ 750 Outreach Programs & kit supplies $2,000 Starlab $1, 000 Feathered Friends $ 500 Hole Worid $ 500 Family Science Saturday - $1,650 . ' PI-Day $1,050 S3 $ 950 Cape Fear Experience $1,300 Summer Day Camps $1.,000 Logo shirts (6 @ $32) $ 192 Books, CD-ROMs . ~ $1,500 Videos $ 700 Computer & Office Supplies $ 500 Increases due to expanded outreach and Cape Fear Experience 4700 Dues & Subscriptions: $ 570 $ 910 NCSTA (2 people) $ 60 . ' ASTC $750 Magazines ~ $100 Increases are adjustments of actual costs. ..5100 Local Travel: ($13/month) $ 350 $ 300 5200 Training/Travel: $ 5,600 $ 5,150 ASTC, Arizona (Science Educator presenting) $1,500 Grassroots Science Admin Meetings (Grant requirement) $1,000 NC Science Teachers Conference (Coordinating Panel) (2) $ 800 NC Math Teachers Conference (Coordinating Panel) (2) $ 800 _ Docent Training Trips $ 300 Coastal Ecology Workshop (Teaching Workshop) $ 250 Museum van mileage $ 400 Eliminated 2 conferences. 5400 Van Insurance. $ 800 $ 800 5835 Administration: Supports Grassroots management. $ 6,814 $ 5,000 6400 C/O Equip: Gallery replacements. $ 2b,795 9109 Administrative Reserve $ 18;337 OPERATIONS TOTAL $ 72,453 5100,739 $138,508 5209,018 TOTAL Stunmary of Major Proposed Changes: • Full fimding for Receptionist/Reservations full time/temporary staff position. o Adds science-focused "Cape Fear Experience" program dollars. • Funds camp teachers and science intern. '~ ®L1 10/22/2001 ~ rah ~ ~ ~,J I '~ I e Contracting dollars available for exhibit assessments. 106 10/22/2001 rah NEW HA(VOVER COUtVTY BOAR® Of COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTIOiV Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Consent Item #: 8 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Parks Presenter: Neal Lewis r Contact: Neal Lewis SUBJECT: Approval of Snows Cut Park Lease . BRIEF SUMMARY; f This item was considered.by the Board, who instructed staff to discuss the issue of the Town of Carolina Beach using some of the property. New Hanover County currently leases approximately 15 Acres of property along Snows Cut from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The property ..has been developed as a park and has been in use for over 15 years. It is one of the more popular park sites in the County parks system. The Corps has offered to lease an additional 22 Acres along Snows Cut to the County. The additional property would allow room.for expansion of the park, or room to relocate some of the existing park structures (i.e. picnic shelter, rest rooms, playground) if erosion problems worsen in the existing section of the park. Part of the property is located on the south shore of Snows Cut. This 10-Acre parcel would be sub-leased•to the Town of Carolina Beach for them to develop as park space. and to tie into their proposed trail system. The. Town of Carolina Beach has developed a plan for the property and the Corps has agreed to the plan and to the sub-lease arrangement. The lease includes an Environmental Baseline Survey, stating that the property is free of hazardous or environmentally threatening conditions. - RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQU'6STED ACTIONS• The. Chairman be authorized to sign the required documents to lease a total of 37.47 Acres at Snows Cut from the U.S Corps of Engineers for a period of 25 years. FUNDING SOURCE:. N/A ATTACH MENTS i 1=~' . Corps Lease Summary REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMEI As recommended above `~ • BUDGET: HUMAN- RESOURCES: N/A ~Oi~N7Y EOMNiI; IQN~i~i ~ APPROVED G REJECTED l ' REMOVED ~ 10 7 POSTPONED ~ HEARD SATE ~ I ~ o o I ~._..~,,, r; {This page intentionally le,~t.blank} ~~v~a~a z <~ ~~~~ ;-~ ~~ a_ .r np + t a~~~A w'!. ~ -~ R :`L i~ ~'-:~ I *' 7 = ~'`~f C wr,F1, ~= ? ", f 1. vim?" +'j~~ r r ~ ~h ` ~ ~` \ F _ ,'i ~,,~, a r ~ t ,. "~ ~- ~ '~ ~ ~~ ~, } , ~- ~ is ~~~ . i / ~` ~:"\ ~ ~ ~ :~~ ~~ a ~G~~ . ._, ~ ~ ,t ~, ~.tiT , ~~ r~ ~ F~~-, ~} v~ ~. (.:- ~ _ '*L y4 ~ lYt _,..~-' F-.- y' or~L `~L -tj~r *, -:'~ y lc . '.. ~'~ _ ~ t-. ;rte ~r~ .r y. y ~ ,~M` a ~'~ ~2 ~.-1'y,•~ ~y 1'_ ,~ l < 5~ ~ ~` L ~~ x ~ e k x.•.ar'Gr ~.. .X ~ ~ '~ ,~„ ~ ' .c a ,r.y ~ t - ,k ,~ ~ 1, a ~ "~ ' w, , ? '~ ~''~}~Y- ~ ~ fir, ; ~ '..{ * ~ ~ ~ 1 ~k C ~~3 ~ Y~ S s .t ~ / J 1 ~ ~ G ~ 1 ;t 2 ~ Y'~ _. ~ H~ ~ J ..~ Y~'ry . '~} ~ t _' ~ {~ Y ,rF w r t -h ~~ _ ' r ~ ( b} x ~ ~.- 1 / YY Y r ,i „' rtil~' -~ ~ r "~ ~ ~„ y I 1 Y T t _ r } f ' ( Y ~ .- ,~~ t.r Y T ~ . ~ ,1~1 ~ °Cf 1 ~r ! '~ 1~ •tti' ' Yr. . m ~ .I (3 ~''~ r .a' -~ _ ~ ,i s s ~ ~~~ ~, e ~ r`r 1~{ j~ fy :. ~ ,,i y~; '. ~ -~ ~~ ~~,~ ~ y5 ~ r_ ~ ~ } 1 ~ ' l `mac - f t~ ~?~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q QU ~ tWi 2 r ~ ~ ; ~~Q~ U J Fa- 0002 1-UU~ O n E Q ~ ^ ~ ~ Hz>U~ ° m z ~ Z = ~o _~ ~ = w ~ O _ 3Zi Z Q ~ NW Z N ~ ~ w Q ~ D: J ~cni •a~ i ws. am •~M z ~' 8 0 ,~c~ ~i Q ~ . v~ w ~ ~ u`1 ¢ ~ Q ~ i O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O '2a O ¢ Q o z w µi' ~ ~ d o ~ ~ ~ ci ti z ~ z z z ~r~z ~ . ~; + ~ ~. ~~~ y ~s... _ ~`4r-.`. ~ ._! i } _`~ r 4 } -"~Ft +.~ ~ m N ~' v N. m N v m S ~.;."r' C 1 tx~ rr~ ~~ i f t ~~~, ''j; .:~ W M M T ~' '? ~- t~ O '~ p R' ~` ~'_~Fr !!`- t ~ ~.`kT .,: ,s y~` ~.~i~~ ~ E • 7 Ir ?`'* ~~t ~ ~ N M c in io r- m m • NEW HANOVER COUfVTY BOAR® OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Budget Amendment • Consent Item #; 9.1 Estimated Time: .Page Number: DEPARTMENT: Public Health/Child Care Health Consultant BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-0074 " ADJUSTMENT DEBIT CREDIT Child Care Health Consultant $37,990 Medical Insurance Expense $279 Salaries and Wages $31,417 Social Security Taxes $2,404 Retirement-Local Govt. Employee $1,561 Long-Term Disability Insurance $69 Printing Charges $300 Employee Reimbursements $518 Employee Reimb./Uniforms $500 Training & Travel $1,500 EXPLANATION: To adjust Child Care Health Consultant et to actual grant award received from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~~~.. c ~,,. . APPROVED ,/' r~ ~• REJECTED_,,.4~_• ~ REMOVED ,.:,-; 4 HEARD _ ~ AA ~~,, . DATA t~ Io~`o~ W i i i '' NE~V HAIVOVER C0~1NTY BOAR® OF COM MISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION '~ ~ Meeting Date:, 11/05/01 budget Arr>lendment Consent Item #: 9.2 Estimated Time: .Page Number: DEPARTMENT: Public Health/Teen Aids Prevention BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-0075 ADJUSTMENT Cape Fear Memorial Foundation Grant DEBIT Medical Insurance Expense $5;000 Departmental Supplies $:1,857 Employee Reimbursements $1,000 $1,000 Salaries and Wages Social Security Taxes Retirement-Local Govt. Employee Long-Te'rm Disability Insurance . EXPLANATION: To adjust Teen Aids Prevention budg o actual amount of grant award received from Cape Fear Memorial Foundation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~pUNT`P CQ~R\~1SSION€ ~ APPROVED LJJI REJECT; ~~ .` ~~' REMOVE[st?~L~~ i:, O POSTPONEf~~I~ ~ '~ ~ FIEARD 4 , h~" ., . .. ~~~ = . CREDIT $7,903 $566 $377 $11 ,-~ MEIN I~AIVOVER .COUNTY 130ARD OF COMM ISSf01VERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION .Meeting Date: 11/05/01 Budget Amendment Consent Item #: 9.3 Estimated Time: .Page Number: DEPARTMENT: Public Health/Maternal Outreach.Worker BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 02-0076 ADJUSTMENT Title XIX Fees DEBIT CREDIT Departmental Supplies $51,000 $653 Partnership For Children Grant Salaries and Wages $4,000 Social Security Taxes $35,489 Retirement-Local'Govt, Employee ~ $2,715 Medical Insurance Expense $1,641 Long-Term Disability Insurance $1,705 Contracted Services $108 Cellular Expense $1;000 Printing Charges $32p Employee Reimbursements $200 Training &.Travel $3,975 $500 EXPLANATION: To adjust Materna! Outreach Worker budget to actual Medicaid revenue projections and actual grant award received from rtnership for Children.. Note: Medicaid revenue of $20,000 was budgeted during budget szcess until projections could be updated 'during the fiscal year. ~ ,,,~/ A®DITIONAL INFORMATION: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~~N~ e©n~~n~sslC~N~r APPROVED G~ REJECTED GI REMOVED ^ POSTPONED HEARD _ ~RT€ ~~ o ~ 111 .,~ at . 7 i ' ,~ t ~:IR 41 '. :~,~ ~~c~+tri ~. .,.rte ._~::s':: ~. ~ r1..,'Y I~