The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 2000 11-13AGENDA , ~pNOVER Co '~` * ~,f . u 2 '~l ~N.O'CA.//O INGV4TNT ~~ NORTNCp November.l3, 2000 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301 ~ ~ .Wilmington, NC WILLIAM A. CASTER CHAIRMAN • ROBERT G. GREER VICE-CHAIRMAN BUZZ BIRZENIEKS, COMMISSIONER • TED DAVIS, JR., COMMISSIONER • CHARLES R: HOWELL, COMMISSIONER ALLEN O'NEAL, COUNTY MANAGER • WANDA COPLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY • LUCIE F. HARRELL, CLERK TO THE BOARD 6:30 p.m. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman William A. Caster) INVOCATION _ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE NON-AGEND A ITEMS (Limit three minutes) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ESTIMATED ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE TIMES - NO. X6:45 p.m. 1. Recognition of Supper Optimist Club All-Star Softball Team 1 ~50 p.m. - 2. L Presentation.by the Greater Wilmington Tennis Association 5 6:55 p.m. 3. Presentation by the Winter Park Volunteer Fire Department ~ Consideration of Proclamations: - ~ ~. - 7:00 p.m. 4.1 Proclamation to Designate November 19, 2000 as .. 25 "Westfield Works Wonders" Day in New Hanover County 7:05 p.m.. 4.2 Proclamation to Designate November as Adoption Awareness Month 7:10 p.m. 5. Consideration of Approval of Bids for Judicial Expansion Project and approval of Associated Budget Amendment #2001-16 .. _ . 7:20 p.m. 6. Consideration of Election of Board of Directors for the New Hanover County 39- - Financing Corporation 7:25 p.m. 7. Consideration of Middle Sound Access Grant Contract and Approval of Budget 41 ° •Amendment #2001-15 .. ~" Consideration of Tax Exemptions and Appeals° '.. , x:35 p.m. 8.1 Appeal of Exemption Denial for Unitariari~Universalist Fellowship of 57 ~" Wilmington, 4306 Spirea Drive, Map #R06101-006-008-000 • 8.2 .Appeal of Exemption Denial for 1996 BMW, St. Nicholas Greek ~ 67 Orthodox Church 8.3 Appeal of 1999 Vehicle Value, 1998 Ford Ranger, Christopher Taylor 77 8:05 p.m. 9. Review of Mason Inlet Relocation Project and Approval of Associated 99 Budget Amendment #01-0072 8:20 p.m. 10. Consideration of Community Oriented Policing Services Grant Award and 107 Approval of Associated Budget Amendment #01-0063 • Public Hearings: 8:30 p.m.. ~ 11.1 Rezoning -Request by Sherwin Cribb, PLS for B&M Properties to rezone 7.31 115 acres of property located on the southeast side of Market Street just north of Porters Neck Road from R-15 Residential to CD (B-2) Conditional Use Highway Business. (Z-716, 10/00) 9:05 p.m. 11.2 Rezoning -Request by Attorney David Barefoot for T.F. Holdings Limited ;. 123 Partnership to rezone 8.55 acres of property located at 3001 Blue Clay Road , .' from R-20 Residential to I-2 Heavy Industrial (Z-712, 08/00) 9:35 p.m 10:05 p.m. ' 10:15 p.m '. ' 10:25 p.m. 10:35 p.m. _'10:40 p.m. 10:50 p.m 11.3 ~ecial Use Permit (continued from June S CC,meeting) -Request by UNC-W to modify a special Use Permit for a Marine Research grid Educational Facility located in the 5000 block of Masonboro Loop Road. (5-329, 03/91 & 04/00) 11.4 Zoning Text Amendment -Request by Smith Properties to amend the Zoning Ordinance's Permitted Use Table to permit commercially operated indoor-outdoor , recreation establishments in'the Airport1Industrial Zoning District. (A-303, 10/00) 11.5 Zoning Text Amendment - Request`by staff to add a definition to section 23 of the definitions section of the County's Zoning Ordinance to define Wholesale . Nurseries and Greenhouses (A-304, 10/00) ~ ~ ~. 11.6 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request to amend the Wilmington-New ' Hanover County CAMA Land Use Plari by+modifying policy 4:'8 to clarify the policy for the development of marinas (LUP-10, 10/00) 12: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) from U.S. Department of ' .Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance - FY 2000 . . - ~ ~ , ADDITIONAL ITEMS ~. County Commissioners County Attorney .. ~,: . .County Manager ~. . , ~ :: ~:. r ~+.. ~., :.Closed Session -Pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11(5) Aquistion of Real Property 143 153 ~.... 161 '` 163 .'~: 169 Closed Session -Pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11(6) Evaluations of County Manager - ,.. ~ ~ .; ,: ~ .. . County Attorney Clerk to the Board , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . ~., , Recess meeting if necessary until 8 ;00 a.m., Tuesday, November 14, .2000 „ ADJOURN •'~~ ~ ~ '.'.. ____~ . CONSENT AGENDA - NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS November 13, 2000 ITEMS OF BUSINESS . 1. Approval of Minutes PAGE NO. ~ 177 2. Approval of Resolution to Release State Funds Allocated to Council of Governments 179 3. Approval of Sale of 6.38 Acres of Land to DOT for Smith Creek Parkway and 183 Approval of Associated Budget Amendment #01-0065 4. Approval of Revision of Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funds 191 S. Approval of Upgrade for Financial, Budget, and Human Resources Systems as a 197 Sole Source procurement and Approval of Amendment to Software Licensing Agreement with American Management Systems (AMS), Contract #01-0171 6. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Chief Project Engineer to Sign Permit 199 ~. Applications 7: Approval of Patent Agreement for WASTEC's Carbon Injection System 201 8. Approval of Grant Application to the NC Department of Pollution Prevention 207 and Environmental Assistance Entitled "Drywall Recycling Project" 9: Approval of Appointment of Scott McLendon, US Army Corps of Engineers 213 • , to the Tidal Creeks Watershed Management Advisory Board ~ . 10. Adoption of Resolution requesting NCDOT to Add Roads in Emerald Chase 219 ~ ' ` and. Willowbrook Subdivisions to the State Highway System ,_ 11. Acceptance and Budgeting of $50,000 provided through Contract to the Health 1.. .223 - Department from The New Hanover County Partnership for Children (Smart Start) . ~ . Through a Grant from The Cape Fear Memorial Foundation to Fund Two Health .. Department Maternity Outreach.Workers and Approval of Associated BA #01-0070 , - 12.' Acceptance and Approval of $12,400 from New Hanover County Schools for a New , .: =~ 239 Half-Time Registered Nurse to be Hired by New Hanover County Health Department ~"~ , - and Approval of Associated BA #01-0071 :;. .. ', , 13. . ~F . Adoption of Resolution -DOT Drainage System Impacting the Futch Creek Watershed '-±255 ' ~, r 14. ~ Approval of Disposal of Surplus Equipment and Vehicles at County Auction to ~ ~ 261 ~s • be Held December 2, 2000 ~ r ~ Approval off Budget Amendments: ; +r _ ~. 15.1 #2001-13 Controlled Substance Tax . r • 275 ' ~ ~; 15.2 #01-0061 to Budget Anticipated FEMA revenue for FY 00-01 , 276 ~ 15.3 _ #01-0066 Social Services/New Hanover County Hurricane Floyd Relief ~ , ;~ n,.277 • Y;Y • 15.4` #01-0067 Public Health/School Health ~ ~ +'f~278 . NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 1 Estimated Time: ~ Page Number: Department: Parks Presenter: Neal Lewis Contact: Neal Lewis SUBJECT: " ~ Recognition of Supper Optimist Club All-Star Softball Team BRIEF SUMMARY: ' The 12 and Under Supper Optimist Club Girls All-Star Softball Team finished as 1st Runner-Up in the Babe Ruth World Series on August 19, 2000. The team won several tournaments along the way. The team, and some of the individual players, accompilshed a great deal during their tournament play. The Supper Optimist Club operates its league at Ogden Park. The team members and coaches will be invited to the November 13, County Commissioners meeting in order to receive the congratulations of the Board. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Adoption of a resolution congratulating the team on its accomplishments during the 2000 Season -and recognition of the team at the meeting.. FUNDING SOURCE: .. N/A ATTACHMENTS: • The accomplishments and a team list is attached. •. Supper All-Star Fact She REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: N/A BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: " Adopt and present Resolution congratulating team on its 2000 accomplishments. COMMISSIONERS'ACTIONS/COMMENTS• ,, " c~uNrv coMMl~loNll . AF#="TED (~" .PC~., ~l-~D d FEEAfZi~ (~. 1 RESOLUTiON NEV6~ ~IANOVER' COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ' WHEREAS, the 12 and Under Supper Optimist Club Girls All. Star Softball Team finished as lS` Runner-up in the Babe Ruth World Series on August 19, 2000, and WHEREAS, the 2000 team accomplishments include District Tournament Champions, on June 26`'', First Runner-Up in North Carolina State Tournament, on July 16`h and'Southeast.Regional Champions, July 30`h, and Second Place.- Babe Ruth World Series, August 1.9`h, and ~ ' r WHEREAS, Krista Leeuwenberg and Kim Johnston achieved an Individual Record for First no- Hitter in World Series History, and - - WHEREAS, Ashley Williams, Jenna Marcum and Eryn Teague were awarded 2000 World Series - All-Defensive Team, and ~ . . ~,. WHEREAS, Krista Leeuwenberg and Lisa White were awarded2000 World Series All World, . ' Series Team, and ' WHEREAS,'Lisa White was awarded 2000 World .Series most Valuable Player, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners congratulate the Supper Optimist Club Al-Star Softball Team on its 2000 accomplishments. ' • ,~ ' .Adopted this the 13"' day of November, 2000, ~ , , ' ' ,. :, o . SEAL ~ ~~ .~. ... 2 William A. Caster, Chairman ~' ~.. c .. ATTEST~''~~~~"~'~ ~"t~~1~, . . ~. _ .~ ~~ ~ ..I .Lucie F. Harrell, Cler""k to the Board _ ' .,, .~~~ . . , ~zn #. a SUPPER OPTIMIST CLUB S 2000 Babe Ruth All-Stars 12 and UNDER SOFTBALL TEAM TEAM MEMBERS: Kim Johnston Morgan Mathis Team Manager - Norwood Wil-Hams Krista Leeuwenberg Ashley LaCock Coaches - Bud LaCock Kristin Lee Amber Randall Jeff Leeuwenberg Jenna Marcum Eryn Teague Steve Meechum Beth Meechum Amanda Webb C.J. White Katie Nolan Lisa White Kelly Musselwhite Ashley Williams INDIVIDUAL AWARDS: 2000 World Series All-Defensive Team: Ashley Williams Jenna Marcum ` Eryn Teague r ~ 2000 World Series All World Series Team: ' Krista Leeuwenberg . - Lisa White . .2000 World Series Most Valuable Player: Lisa White • Individual Record: • Krista Leeuwenberg & Kim Johnston: 1S` No-Hitter in World Series History -.TEAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: District Tournament Champions -June 26 • 1St Runner-Up in North Carolina State Tournament -July 16 Southeast Regional Champions -July 30 2°~ Place -.Babe Ruth World Series -August 19 • Note: Lost to Pitt County, North Carolina, 3-2 in the Final Game. p c 3 v {This page intentionally left blank} F NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting.Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item. #: 2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: County Manager Presenter: Anna Martin Contact: Allen O'Neal SUBJECT: Presentation by the Greater Wilmington Tennis Association BRIEF SUMMARY: Anna Martin, USTA League Coordinator with the Greater Wilmington Tennis Association will make a short presentation to the Board on the needs of the Tennis Association. The Association is comprised of more than 1,400 members ranging in age from 19 to 80. The Association's membership is growing as ae their needs for courts. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: FUNDING SOURCE: . ATTACHMENTS: ~ . ITEM bOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend the Board of Commis ' ers hear the presentation and refer The Tennis Association to the Parks Advisory Board. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/ 0 MENTS: ~ ~. • GREATER WILMINGTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION 8825 Sawmill Creek Lane Wilmington, NC 28411 Phone (910) 686-5191 Fax (910) 251-6658 Email - ybarzeev@telcordia.com 10/23/2000 r Allen O'Neal County Manager 320 Chestnut St., Room 502 Wilmington, NC 28401 RE: County Commissioners Meeting; November 13, 2000 Dear Mr. O'Neal: Our organization, the GREATER WILMINGTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION would like to be added to the agenda for the November 13, 2000 evening meeting. . . I have spoken to Ted Davis about-the use ofi present tennis facilities. Mr. Davis and your administrator, Carol, referred me to you. Your consideration . . is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, I may be reached in the . afternoons at 392-5807. ~ ' ~~~'' ~"~~ ~' Thank You , , /1 ~/~ i ~ .- . , NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 • • Regular Item #: 3 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: County Manager Presenter: Winter Park Volunteer Fire Deprtment Contact: Dave Weaver/bonnie Hall SUBJECT: Presentation by Winter Park Volunteer Fire Department BRIEF SUMMARY: .Winter Park Volunteer Fire department wishes to present a Powerpoint presentation: Summary of events and concerns: , x As a result of City of Wilmington annexations the southern service area of Winter Park was entirely eliminated. '~ The remaining northern service area has been realigned effective November 30, 2000.The Board of County Commissioners approved this on August 21, 2000. The approval for relaignment was granted as a result of the recommendation for the Fire Commission.. ~` The realignment is necessary in order to provide more comprehensive coverage, thereby improving customer service. x Winter Park Fire Department is displeased with the decision made by the Fire Commission and County Commissioners. However, please be reminded that.Winter Park volunteers can continue to offer services through any of the remaining volunteer fire departments in the county. * Some Winter Park volunteers are claiming unfair treatment by the Fire Commission with regard to funding and purchasing of equipment. Fire Chairman Jim Sawyer, Chief Hall, the County Legal and Finance Departments have reviewed all claims and find none to be valid. A copy of the proposed and unedited Powerpoint presentation is in the County Manager's office. It is lengthy and subject to editing therefore, it is not included in this package. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Listeri to the presentation. Chief Hall will be available for any questions by the Board. FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW Hear presentation. OMMENTS: COUIV'f~ ~ -APPROVED ~ REJECTED ~ ,,~~ REMOVED p ; -:`~ POSTPONE®~ HEARD n,.,''~ ~~ i ~~ 7 ~~Ywwu~~, Uy. ~U,2~i0'~ L15 ~C.~ r November 1, 2000 Mr. Alan O'Neal Manager, Ne~v Hanover County 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401 • ~ ~ Dear Mr. O'Neal; ~ - . .: , ~•, . .: As we discussed earlier, enclosed isi.a printout of our current PowerPoint , . presentation for the County Commissioners meeting on November 13th. .: Pleas be advised, that this is-still a."work in progress". ,The .final version may not be done until just before the meeting. The Board of Directors is holding its ,monthly business meeting on November 6th with all the members. I'm sure some changes, additions or possibly, deletions. ray occur between now and the actual' , • ,.a A -. i will. be fain accurate resentation. I,believe th s co still as to .the reasons for the P Py .. Y ~_ .~ presentation. If you should have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at my office at 763-9331, or the Winter Park Station at 395-4145. • :~ Thank You.. .. i ' Regards, _ ~ ~ ~., ~ ~~ - I ~ . ~~ R~ ., • A: William (Bill) D'Emilio ~ ~ . ~ _ , ~'' President(rC}~~(:~,~~!7~~ p~ _~ ,. ~ _ . .. ., M . ..... r.+a•ndATl`R'9L1~Ii^ ~ .~+ ~..4 t.., W, t } ~ d I t. vvmier rarK voiunieer Fire Department ~~,.. • • October 12, 2000 New Hanover Board of County Commissioners 320 Chestnut Street Room 305 Wilmington, NC 28401 Dear Commissioner, '®c~~~~~ ac~r ~ ~ ~oaa NEW HANOVER CO. MANAGER'S OFFICE The purpose of this letter is to advise you of our request to the County Manager to be placed on the agenda for your November 13th meeting. As you are aware, the Fire administrator made a presentation to you on August 21st with reference to post phase 2 fire protection. One of the items in that presentation was the removal of our northern fire district, and placing it with Ogden V.F.D. as their primary response area. If you recall, there was difficulty obtaining a motion to approve this plan because of what it would do to our department. It was only after the question was asked if the Fire Commission had approved this plan unanimously, which it had, was a motion made and passed to approve the plan. We have since talked directly to a number of Fire Commissioners with reference to that vote. One of the Commissioners stated he voted for it because he believed he was voting to approve the acceptance of this plan to the Fire Commission for further study, not to go to the County Commissioners for final approval. Another Fire Commissioner stated he approved the plan because he was led to believe this was a money issue. He was told the County would have to pay Winter Park approximately ~ 60,000.00 per year to have us retain this area as our primary district. Actually, those figures were 3 years old. Due to property tax increases and an increase in the Fire Tax since phase 2 was announced by the city, we will be receiving more funds from the City of Wilmington than the total amount of our county contract. As per the contract, the county would then not have to pay Winter Park one dollar to continue to protect the northern district. Therefore, no Fire Tax Dollars will be needed by our department to continue to protect this northern district for the county. We believe this confusion in the vote, which the Fire Administrator is aware of, would have resulted in a different outcome at the County Commissioners meeting August 21st. One of the Fire Commissioners suggested we go back to the Fire Commission with this information and ask for a new vote. We did present this request to the Fire Administrator, but were recently informed that the executive committee of the Fire Commission had informed him that they would not allow this issue to be brought back before them. , . _ ,, t ` `, J, ~~ `.', 1 b 2000 ; ~ 9 . ;.~ . ,, , !IY~.elJ 4601 Park Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 910-395-4145 Phone 910-395-6028 Fax . t Since then, we have been informed by the City of Wilmington, that'without a primary~district, the city would not contract with us for mutual aid in the phase 2 area. This means that both Winter Park and Sea Gate Fire Departments would be forced to close their doors. This leaves the county in a very vulnerable position for fire protection. Afire in the Myrtle Grove/Federal Point or Wrightsboro./Castle Hayne areas would result in mutual aid coming from 15 to 20 miles away. Any truck that may respond from the city would have, at best, 500 gallons of water. One tanker from our department has 2,000 gallons of water, or the equivalent of 4 city fire trucks. Considering the fact that these two departments can stay open at no cost to the county, we believe it would be difficult to explain to homeowners in the northern or southern areas, why these two . departments were closed and help has to come from such a great distance. All it takes is a primary response area, no money, and you have over 10 pieces of firefighting apparatus; 60 firefighters, 15 EMT/Medical Responders, 12 officers, 7 instructors and over 8,000 gallons of water to respond anywhere in New Hanover County to protect the residents. Again; bottom line is NO COST TO ~ , THE COUNTY. ~ . If any Commissioner has any questions, please feel free to contact me at my office (763-9331), home (452-0319) or at the station (395-41.45). We look forward,to formally presenting the above and additional information to you on November 13th. . .. ._. ~ Sincerely, _ . , .. ~ WINTER PARK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT .. .,, - _/ i ~ - A. William D'Emilio .. ; ~ ~ .. .. ~ - ., President; ~ .. ~ . _ ~ ' t . ~, . ~ ~ ' ' ~ _ ~ .~ .. o • • October 9, 2000 Mr. Alan O'Neal Manager, New Hanover County 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401 Dear Mr. O'Neal, As per earlier telephone conversations with Mr. Dave Weaver, enclosed please find our request and back up information so we may be placed on your agenda for the November 13th meeting of the County Commissioners. If you should have any questions, or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at my office (763-9331), my home (452-0319), or at the Winter Park Station (395-4145). Thank You, for your assistance. A. William (Bill)~Emilio President October 9, 2000 The Winter Park Volunteer Fire Department has requested to be placed on-the agenda for your November 13th meeting to discuss two issues concerning the Volunteer Fire Departments in New Hanover County. First, and most importantly, we would like to bring before you new facts with reference to the removal of Winter Park's Northern District as our primary response area for the County. The presentation by'the Fire Administrator during your August 2~1 st meeting for'Post Phase 2 Annexation plans, included'removing'thisarea from Winter Park.' The County Commissioners agreed this was an emotional issue, since `ve have served this area for 50 years. Iri fact, there ' was trouble getting a motion and a second until. the question was asked if the decision from the ' Fire Commission was unanimous. Sinceyou were informed it was, the proposal was then approved. -.New facts will show that although the vote was unanimous, some of the Fire Commission members were not aware of the purpose of the vote, and, in fact, believed they :. were voting for other reasons. They are willing to back up our department on this matter: . With the City of Wilmington not willing to fulfill the 5 year contract with us or Seagate, if there' ;~~'. is no primary district for either department, we feel it is critical that the County Commissioners understand the ramifications of.what will now be the closing of these two departments. This '' . ranges from crucial mutual aid to the county and city, standby/back up~-for Rescue 1 and 4, and standby for EMS when 500 is out of service. All it will take to keep both'departments in ' service at no cost to the county is a primary .district. We ask that you allow us to present our ".. plans to keep both departments open and serving New.Hanover County for many years at .~ ~., . absolutely no cost to the County taxpayers. `'The Executive Comrriittee of the Fire Commission has stated they will not bring this issue back, to the Fire Commission. With support from all '' other Volunteer Departments in this County, who feel it is imperative not to close these two ' !~ departments, then we believe the County Commissioners, who are ultimately responsible for ~_~`'"-?~' public safety, should have the final word on the closing of these organizations. .. .. ~ ; ; ,. . 2 ~celc~ibr~~timg ~~ ~'~~~s o~ ~~~m~~a~u~ty ~~r~ne~ r: • Secondly, enclosed with this cover letter is a copy of a presentation given to the Fire Commission at their regular monthly meeting on May 24, 2000. This presentation listed a number of issues effecting the volunteer departments, especially Winter Park. We believed the information was serious enough to request an immediate investigation, and the removal of one,of the commissioners for biased and unfair treatment toward certain volunteer departments, while insuring his department received special treatment. Winter Park and .other volunteer departments waited anxiously for the results of this investigation. Most of us were tired of this unfair treatment and wanted action and changes. What we received was a personal letter from the chairman of the Fire Commission saying he could find that nothing was done improperly: We have enclosed a copy of his reply for your information. With the exception of consulting a number of personnel with reference to the legality of a truck purchase, all the information in his letter was his personal opinion. In discussing this with other Fire Commission members, we found they were never consulted about this investigation, nor were they asked their opinion on any of the allegations, even though they were aware of the presentation and had copies of the same. This was not what .the volunteers had asked for, and only further shows proof of special treatment and an attempt to hide the mistreatment of some of the volunteer departments. We were all disappointed, but not surprised at this letter. - We believe this is a cover up of special treatment by certain members, and unfair treatment of departments not having direct representation on this commission. I am sure Mr. Howell has been keeping you informed of the complaints lodged against the Fire Commission, and therefore, we are requesting that you hear our side of the story and decide if an investigation and/or the removal of one or more of the Fire Commission members is warranted. We would like to keep this issue separate from the request regarding the closing of Sea Gate and Winter Park, and would be willing to meet with the County Commissioners on this subject at their convenience. Sincerely, ,, - A. William (Bill) D'Emilio President Winter Park Vol. Fire Department 13 ~. ~~~~a M~~ ~~9 ~~~c~ ~°®a ~~~ ]E~AI~T®~~~ ~®~J~T7[°~Y ~~[~]E ~®MM~~~~®l~T ]F~; Av ~V~llll~~~ ~91.~~n~~~® I have requested this time `vith you tonight to bring to light what we believe to be 2 subjects that should be of grave concern to this Commission. The first is the unfair treatment of certain volunteer departments in this county, mainly Winter Park, and secondly, what we believe the unfair, and perhaps illegal, procedure used for the recent purchase of the Myrtle Grove Mini-pumper. For those of you who were not on the Fire Commission a few years ago, I would like to start at the beginning to bring everyone up to speed. Approx. 5 years ago, Winter Park submitted in its annual budget request, the replacement of Engine 291 which would soon be 20 years old. Up until that time, normal protocol in this county, was a department replaced their pumpers at 20 years of age. Following this procedure, we submitted our request. The funds for our new truck were originally approved, but placed in a contingency budget to be decided ~on at a later date. This contingency budget was approved by the Fire Commission and the County Commissioners. 'As an omen of things to come, your Chairman stated at the meeting. that it didn't matter because Winter Park wouldn't be around in a year. This came--from your Chairman. The reason apparently was that phase 1 and 2 annexation were looming over the county, and they wanted more information on when it would happen because they felt they would have a hard time explaining to the county tax payers why they purchased a truck that would be running in the county and the city. Of the 970,000 dollars in this contingency ~' . ' budget, all items except our truck were released. 1 As you all probably know, we fought-hard to justify the replacement of 291 over the next few years, but the possibility of annexation was always a reason for delay. We tried to have 261 used as a rescue vehicle, but instead the county spent a great deal of money on Rescue 1 and Rescue 4 when 261 was already equipped better than them and ready for service immediately at no cost to the county. Our central location put us equidistant to the northern and southern ends of the county. Still we are only used for standby purposes. 15 ~. At this last budget meeting, when Winter Park presented its budget proposal, it started out on a bad note. There were no original questions about the budget. It was actually some time before we even started talking about the budget. Why? .Because Chief Davis was upset's about the change in~decals on Service 261's doors. The first words by him as Chief Hunt ~ ~ and I sat down were "Who owns 261?". I replied Winter Park does. His next comment was that tive didn't and that the county did. This went on for. a while without any comment from ' anyone else on the commission. I finally explained to Chief Davis that the title was in Winter Parks name, but that my understanding was that if our department were to close, 261 was to remain in the county. I was again told I was wrong, but that he would look into it. That was 3 months ago and we still have not received a reply from Chief Davis or anyone else who was at the budget meeting. This is all because Chief Davis believed that we had removed County logos from the doors of 26.1 and replaced them with Winter Park logos. He was so upset about this, that he called other: county chiefs to complain, said the truck would be taken away from us, even called one of our honorary members that attends the same church as he does, and demanded to meet with him after services to get to. the bottom of this. Our member didn't go to church that Sunday. At a house fire a few days later, Chief Bianco came up to me and wanted to know why we removed the county decals for . our own. I showed Chief Bianco the doors of 261 and explained the following. The original decals on 261 were. not county logos. It was the.New Hanover Firefighters logo that we had modified to show a picture of 292 and 261. It was never a county logo. It was ` always a Winter Park Design. He then asked why would we take the name"New Hanover , ~ : . .County off the truck. Answer; we didn't:. The Winter Park logo also says New Hanover _ County on it. So all this flack we were getting from everybody, especially members of the .Myrtle Grove Fire Dept. was because Chief Davis thought we removed.a New Hanover. ' County decal. Members of his department were actually. giving us grief for no reason other than Chief Davis was wrotzg about the decals.. A full time county firefighter who works at station 31 approached one of our members on a fire ground-and wanted to,know why we .. were being so petty. :. . .. ~ ,~~. This attitude of Chief Davis carried over onto. the budget process ,by the immediate attack '. " on us about 261 rather than discussing the budget. Our 45 minute allotment for the budget ~. stretched into over 1 1 /2 hours. -Chief Davis was shooting down so many of our budget, .~~,~ requests, that on one item another committee member. had to remind him they had just ~ ` `. - approved the exact same thing for a department before,us ~Is this fair and,equal treatment?, ' I think not. Another example of the way we were treated by Chief ,Davis and the budget ~" committee was the request for replacement of the fill station~ori 2611.,.,;We were advised by . ~ .' -the company servicing our compressor that the fill station could not withstand a bottle ~. exploding in it as it was being filled. This places everyone m.~the immediate area of 261 in z danger whenever it is fiilirig air bottles. We requested replacing it with an explosion proof 5 '. ~ ;" fill station. The funds for it were put aside while the budget committee set up a separate - group to look into replacing 261 with a new county truck: You mean to tell me that this :~ `" ~ `' county would spend over $ 150,000 dollars so it can have a title in the county's name rather 16 than a minor upgrade to 261? This was due to the fact that Chief Davis still was upset --' because he believed we removed county stickers from 261. "'` ,: " ": As you all know, the county owns Tower 383 currently located at the Myrtle Grove station. There are over 12 decals on that truck identifying it as property of Myrtle Grove and its number 383. There is not one decal showing Ne~v Hanover County's name. Why is that? Why is that OK, yet Chief Davis is allowed to continually complain about non county decals being replaced on 261, even though our new decals say New Hanover County? A couple of years ago, I made a presentation to this commission that it change its structure to allo`v one member of each department, along with its current at large members, to be on the commission thereby ensuring each department had equal and fair representation. This was turned down because it was felt a commission that large `would be too unwielding. It would have meant the addition of 3 members not currently having a direct representative on the commission at that time. Chief Davis stated in the meeting, he was insulted that I would think any department would be treated unfairly. He stated that when he sits on the Fire Commission he does not represent Myrtle Grove, but he represents all departments equally. Again, I think not. Our treatment in that budget meeting was atrocious. It was my 5th budget meeting, and we were treated like criminals by Chief Davis. One comment I'll ask you to remember in a few minutes came from the Fire Administrator. We had 3 proposals presented to the budget commission for a replacement vehicle. First `vas replacing 291 with a new truck. Not surprisingly it was again rejected. Second, was Winter Park would sell 291 and 292, contribute .all proceeds toward a new vehicle, but again turned down. Third was to at least refurbish 292 which is 12 years old at an approx. cost of ~ 60,000.00. Another reject, headed by Chief Davis, with one of the reasons being potential annexation of our southern district'. Yes, We `would still have our Northern district, mutual aid, EMS, rescue, etc., but that was not enough to justify the expense. When we expressed concern about the maintenance cost of a 12 and 22 year old truck, the .Fire Administrator stated that high maintenance cost was no reason to replace a truck. Ifit were, we .would be replacing trucks every mon th in this county. When Sea Gate faced phase 1 annexation, which took a majority of their district, this commission basically told them, good luck, hope you can stay in business, maybe you should :join forces with Winter Park, but don't look to the county for any assistance. As Winter Park faced phase 2 annexation, we were told, good luck, hope you can stay in business, maybe you can join forces with Sea Gate, but don't look to the county for assistance. Now Federal Point faces loosing part of their district to annexation from Carolina Beach and Kure Beach and what happens? They get a million dollars to relocate approx. 1 mile, a brand riew station, and a good part of Myrtle Groves fire district. Why? Original talk was for Myrtle Grove and Federal Point to join forces, but they couldn't work anything out. Perhaps asub-station near Snows Cut Bridge would work, but then the Fire Administrator showed you how by spending the money now would probably insure the city would purchase the new station if that district were ever annexed. NIr. Kauwe expressed how the city wants to purchase the Myrtle Grove fire station when phase 3 occurs, and therefore a sub-station would not be sufficient when the city takes over. OK, I 'can understand that with the closing of Myrtle Grove's station, the northern end of Federal Point, where' l~ge . amount of homes are going in, needs to be protected. No problem. However, this places ,Myrtle Grove in the unique situation where their station will be sold to the city, and they will have virtually no county fire district left, so for all practical'purposes; they~will be~ forced to close if and when phase 3 happens. ..Now with that information. as background, lets move on to ~my second reason for being hem the replacement Mini-pumper for Myrtle Grove. While we wish no ill toward any department obtaining a new or replacement truck while we still struggle to justify one for ourselves, as far as I know, all other truck request have gone through proper channels and have been approved or disapproved accordingly. - ~ ~ ` In January, 1Vlyrtle Grove asked to replace their mini-pumper 392. They stated they could not justify, the continued expenses for maintenance and repairs as they were approaching the - weight capacity of the vehicle. If this was Winter Park making the same request, you would probably tell. us to,remove sorrie of the equipment to lighten the_load, or don't use it for :reasons it was not originally purchased for. ~-~Thecommission approved the purchase request as long as it was within the budget process. Why? Myrtle Grove is now in the same situation we were 5 years ago, only instead of loosing part of their district when annexed, their . ~ .station will be:sold to the city and they could cease to exist as a county entity. ~ They stated they could receive between 50 to 55 thousand dollars for 392, with the full ,amount going towards the.new vehicle. They then stated they needed between 100 to-110 . ~ thousand from the county bringing ,the total purchase price to 160,000 dollars. How could this commission justify replacing a 2 year old truck with this annexation loomitr~ . , over Myrtle Grove? We're taking between $1.00,000 to 110,000 dollars. ~If you can't justify,. ~ replacing a 20 year old truck due to partial annexation, how can you justify replacing a 2 year . . old truck with complete annexation? My.answer is you can't. ;Also, how can this commission ' ;' justify spending $100,000 dollars to replace a 2 year old truck because of high maintenance when just minutes before you approved the money in the budget meeting, the Fire - .. ~. Administrator stated high maintenance cost was no reason to replace a truck? Again my `.~ answer is you can't. We believe Myrtle Grove is ,receiving special treatment because of the ' ' ~ :power given to Chief Davis by this commission. Do ynu really think anyone believes he is . ~` impartial? He has convinced this commission to give Winter Park as little as possible, using - partial annexation as a reason, while you continue to give him everything he requests. ` ' ~ ' ' _ =Now the proverbial straw that forced me.to speak out, happened at the'last~Fire ~Commissiori~ ~;.' meeting on,April 26th. At that meeting, the'Fire Administrator was going through over .300,000 dollars in budget cuts for the'county.~ Every.department lost it's capital ~ " ' 4; ,~ ~ t=>'.improverrients; and a second A.E.D.,~~also 'cut were the final 2 thermal imagers; an addition to . :,Station 51, and full and part time.firefighters..Listed on~ahe Power Paint display you were `~ . ;; ~ shown, was the Myrtle Grove mini-pumper as, a budget cut item. The .Fire Administrator told ;.. , ,.all of us that it was. riot cut from the budget and he would explain why later in the ,-.presentation. Well we learned later, that the county was given a once in a lifetime deal on the . -. new truck.,: The company,; selling the truck to Myrtle Grove agreed to take 392 in on trade thereby giving Myrtle .Grove a much higher price for 392 than if they were to sell it on the ;open market as originally planned.. How much was this great trade in? $ 50,000 dollars.. , .. I don't consider that a great deal since Myrtle Grove stated to this commission they could get between 50,000- to 55,000 dollars for 392 if they sold it themselves. So, the trade in was a wash at best. No big deal. However, the final purchase price of the truck must be where this unbelievable deal was. In fact, according to the Fire Administrator,it was such a good deal, they had only 3 days to make a decision or they would loose it. He stated there wasn't enough time to call a meeting of the Fire Commission so they went directly to the county budget department with this unbelievable deal because of the time constraint. Someone at the county level was so impressed, that it was approved before the budget cuts were announced, and the new truck was delivered to Myrtle Grove the day before the budget cuts were recommended to this Fire Commission. Wow. This must have beers one hell ofa deal. After the meeting adjourned, I asked one of the Fire Commissioners what was the final price of the truck. I had in my mind it would be 70,000 to 80,000 dollars. That might be a heck of a deal since the original price to the county was about 100,000. The Fire Commissioner had no idea.. Not one of you asked. You were led to believe it was such a good deal it had to be approved. This wasn't a fire extinguisher, or a couple of hundred feet of hose, but a fire truck. Every commissioner felt.that if they were told it was too good of a deal to pass up, then it must have been. They next day, I called the Fire Administrator and asked him just how great was this deal. Final price of the truck was ~ 105,000. dollars. $105,000 dollars? That's the deal? The budget amount was $ 100,000 to 110,000 dollars. How was this such a good deal that it bypassed the budget committee, bypassed the Fire Commission, bypassed the budget process, most importantly, bypassed the budget cuts? There was no deal. This was a smoke screen to get the truck purchased at it's quoted price. If this. replacement fora 2 year old truck had been cut from the budget, as it should have, `each department would have received it's second A.E.D., the thermal imagers would have been left in the. budget, and perhaps the majority of the capital improvements could have .stayed. But instead, this commission was duped into believing they saved the taxpayers a lot of money. Actually, all the taxpayers got was cheated. I was then told that if the truck was not purchased now, that one or two years from now the price map go up ~ 20,000 dollars. So? Truck prices go up every month: The county didn't save anything. The county lost. Perhaps that missing A.E.D. or Thermal Imager might have made a difference in saving a life in the next 12 months. - This deal was the exact same deal Myrtle Grove had been talking about for six months. It was a piggyback purchase with another Fire Department. Nothing had changed. i ,19 Myrtle Grove's board also recently voted to spend an additional $15,000 dollars toward the purchase of this truck. Is this money being given to the county to reduce the final price of the truck, or is the actual cost of this vehicle now $ 170,000 dollars. $170,000 dollars for a min pumper to_replace,a 2 year old truck, and this commission won't even refurbish our 12 year ~ old, first out and sometimes only out pumper, for about 1 /3 of the price. ~, Now, all departments were notified on May 16th that an additional cut, this time to their capital expenditures budget is riecessary because `ve are still over budget. On May 17th, Chairman Sawyer sent a letter requesting all departments to protest directly to the County. Commissioners that an increase in the -fire tax must happen to continue to protect the county properly. City annexation is the main culprit according to the letter, yet last year, the Fire Administrator told this commission that Phase 1 would have little if any effect on the budget. I don't know how any department in this county can honestly demand a higher fire tax from the residents while funds are being spent in this manner. ~ ~ ~. ' Am'I imagining this prejudice Chief Davis, a member of this Fire Commission has towards. Winter Park. Is it just sour grape's because'we did not get our truck replacement~approved? ' ~ I'm sure that is what some of you-are thinking. So, let me give you a couple more examples of this negative attitude. ~ ~ ' At the EMS Day recently held at Myrtle Grove, Winter Park'was therewith Service 261 as were other fire departments; EMS, County Personnel, Hospital Personnel, members of this commission, and the public. When it was over, Chief Davis stood up and thanked Castle ~~ I-Iayne, Myrtle Grove, Federal Point, SeaGate, EMS, EMS-500, and ~I-Iospital personnel ford their participation that day. Winter Park'was never mentioned, even though he°was facing our. - truck, and our crew, while he was speaking: 'Our firefighters. were belittled and .embarrassed. _ ~,, . k 2~0 We weren t lust innocently forgotten, -we were ignored. ° After Chief ~-Davis was through, Dr. Atkinson went over to our crew and said that even though Wilbur Davis failed to ~~ecognize =; us, lie wanted Winter Park to kno`v that the Hospital and EMS were fully aware' of our .presence, and how much they appreciated our support. ~ ~...~., ~ :' ~; ~' . ' i The most recent Inezdentoccurred at~a yard sale. at the Myrtle Grove station.-This is an .annual event sponsored by the Ladies Auxiliary to benefit the BurnCenter in. Chapel Hill. It was assumed that members of our department would be welcome .to attend .-One of our . firefighters brought his wife and kids there to buy a few items and help out the burn center. As they approached each other, he. said hello to Chief Davis.'.The chief walked up 'to him, pointed to the Winter Park logo on his shirt, mumbled something about WuitersPark while ' ~ shaking his head in disgust, and walked away from him. Is this howla department chief is r~ supposed to treat members of other departments? Especially in front of his family? You'll never convince me that this negative attitude doesn't come across t~o members of his department and this Commission. How can.you continue to allow. a (member of this Fire Commission to degrade our members, deny us equal access to_equipment ;and funds, and jeopardize our safety? We want him removed from this Fire Commission. .. .. In closing, I would like to summarize our treatment by Chief Davis and this ® Commission, and the actions we would like implemented. e We believe Winter Park and other volunteer departments have been treated unfairly by this Fire Commission ®- We believe that if potential annexation can stop a truck purchase for one department, then all departments facing partial or full annexation should be treated equally. s We believed this commission failed to use 261 as a, rescue vehicle for the county, and spent tens of thousands of dollars avoiding it's use. s We believe Chief Davis's explosion over the non-existent county logos on 261 influenced decisions made by this commission. o We believe comments made during the budget.meeting only reinforced the negative attitude Chief Davis has toward Winter Park, and how that attitude was allowed to be used during our presentation to the budget committee. We believe safety of Winter Park and other firefighters has been compromised by Chief Davis's and the budget committee's attitude to hold up the replacement of the fill station on 261, by looking into replacing the entire truck, just so it will be owned by the county. We believe this fire commission needs direct representation from each volunteer fire department to insure this never happens again. e We believe that if high maintenance is not a reason to replace a 22 year old truck, than it should also be a reason not to replace a 2 year old truck. s We believe this fantastic deal presented by Myrtle Grove; during the middle of budget cuts taken by all departments, was a misappropriation of county funds. This Committee's main responsibility is to present a balanced budget to the County Commissioners as well as overseeing expenditures. You are ultimately responsible to them that county tax dollars are being spent properly. We also believe that this purchase should be investigated by a separate committee or the county attorney. If any wrongdoing is found, then the county attorney should take appropriate action. As a county resident who pays the county and fire taxes as each of you do, I~ want to ensure my money is being administered properly and fairly. e We request the finding of this inquiry be presented to Winter Park, in writing, within 90 days. , . ~ - ~ ~ '21 jesawyer~a~nindspring. com August 18, 2000 " TO: A. William D'Emilio Winter Park VFD FROM: James W. Sawyer, Chairman ~ " New Hanover County Board of Fire Commissioners i _ ,. • ~ • SUBJECT: Winter Park's May 24,•2000, Presentation.to the Fire Commission Dear Mr. D'Emilio: I will comment on what I believe are the pertinent issues in your,May 24, 2000, I( presentation. l ,." ~ y , ~ In reference to the Myrtle Grove mini-pumper purchase, I have met with Assistant County Manager, Dave Weaver, and -Chief Hall as has Bob' Kiehlmeier on a separate " occasion and have come to the conclusion that the purchase was "a good deal" for the County.. The mini-pumper had already been approved by the Fire Conunission during ~" - • ' ~ ~ , • the budget process. The purchase was a"limited-time opportunity and was done before there was .knowledge of any necessary fire department budget cuts. The County Attorney has also looked into, the situation and found no problems. 'You have already ~, ., -" ~re`ceived correspondence from that office. For any further clarification in this matter, I _ .. ' 'suggest you contact Chief Hall. , .' ~ • . . ,. ....,: The Fire Commission has not used annexation as an "excuse"; but as a "fact" for how it has handled capital purchases and projects for Winter Park and Seagate. `Unfortunately, " ' `legal challenges have drawn out the annexation process more than 3 ''/2 "years::.If it had not been challenged, .your issue would be ~ moot as both .departments would have long . been annexed into the city. The Fire Commission, the Office of .the Fire Administrator, and County •Management have all been m support of this policy: It was one of the earliest recommendations made by the, staff of E.S.C.G. when they were commissioned • "in November 1997 "to conduct a fire service feasibility and unification study to evaluate and identify appropriate actions and alternatives for the future." The' recommendations were published in the March 1998, "Feasibility Study for New Hanover County Fire .Services." In it, Winter Park and Seagate were eliminated. 2.2 . :. • NEW HA,NOVER COUNTY BOARD OF FIl2E CONINIISSIONERS 414 CFIESTNUT STREET, ROOM 307 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4045 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7420 • • • The rescue issue was resolved by a county-wide task force. Their recommendations have been implemented. Winter Park's decision to purchase rescue equipment was a unilateral one. No outside input was requested. When and where future annexation will go is unknown. The City's political leadership is not in favor of moving forward with Phase III at this time. There is also evidence that the City is looking closely at a northern expansion rather than a southern one. It may be . a more attractive option for them. Neither the Fire Commission, nor the County, intend to ignore services and resources of Winter Park or Seagate after Phase II annexation.. Seagate has requested to provide mutual aid with the County while the County maintains their communications capabilities. I see no problem here. You, Chief Hall, and I have discussed a role for Winter Park that will allow it to be an integral part of the New Hanover County,Fire Service. I see no problem here also. The role of the Fire Commission will be examined during the upcoming "Strategic Plan" sessions. Finally, I see no reason to take any action against Chief Davis. ' Winter Park has a long and justifiably proud tradition in providing Fire Service to their community and the citizens of New Hanover County. Unfortunately, outside forces are changing what might be considered the traditional volunteer fire department in New Hanover County. Winter Park is affected to a much .greater degree. It is tune to remember the past, but not live in it. If the membership of Winter Park want to remain a viable firefighting force in New Hanover County, it must be prepared to move ;from yesterday's memories to the challenges of tomorrow. Sincerely, ~_ ames W. Sawyer ~ cc: Fire Commission Members ~ ~ Donnie Hall, Fire Admiriistrator ` Dave Weaver, Assistant. County Manager . • • NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 .Regular Item #: 4.1 Estimated Time: -Page Number: ,Department: Governing Body P"resenter: Chairman William A. Caster Contact: Lucie F. Harrell SUBJECT:. Proclamation to Designate November 19, 2000 at "Westfield Works Wonders" Day in New Hanover County BRIEF SUMMARY: Adopt a proclamation designating November 19,2000 as "Westfield Works Wonders" day in New Hanover County as a charity extravaganza to support over 50 local non-profit organizations that actively participate to enhance their services to the entire community. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Present the proclamation to Ms. Traci Hockman, Marketing Director, Westfield Shoppingtown Independence Mall: FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT.REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt and present Resoluti Ms. Traci Hockman, Marketing Director, Westfield Shoppingtown Independence Mall. COMMISSIONERS' ACTT N /COMMENTS: , ~'~OUfV1Y COMMI~h~ APPROVED Gam-- I~res~ REJECTED . ®. :: :REMOVED ~ ' - POSTPONED ~ ~ ~'- FIEARi•J C14 ~ i;; ~~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROCLAMATION i .. 26 WHEREAS, in 1999, thirty-nine Westfield Malls nationwide generated over one million dollars for over one thousand different non-profit organizations; and WHEREAS, in 1999, over forty-five local charities participated and more than fifty thousand dollars was generated for non-profit organizations in the Wilmington area; and . WHEREAS, on November 19, 2000, from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m:; Westfield Shoppingtown Independence Mall will host Westfield Works Wonders, an annual corporate charity event;,and ,. WHEREAS, New Hanover County is pleased to endorse Westfield Works Wonders as a charity extravaganza that will support over fifty local non-profit organizations; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED by .the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to designate November 19, 2000 as Westfield Works Wonders day in New Hanover County, and salute the non-profit groups who `actively participate to enhance their services to the entire community.. ~ ~ - - . r. Adopted the thirteenth day of November, 2000 ~ . William A. Caster, Chairmen [SEALJ ; .~ ~. - .. ~~,~.Y . ~~~ ~~ "' _ ~~. ~ . Lucie F.~ Harrel #Clerk~~to`~the Board ' 1. ~ • • NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 4.2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: DSS Presenter: Wayne Morris Contact: Wayne Morris SUBJECT: Adoption Awareness Month BRIEF SUMMARY: The Governor has proclaimed November as Adoption Awareness Month in North Carolina to recognize the value of adoption for children in need of permanent homes with loving families. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: The Board of Social Services unanimously requests that the Board of Commissioners proclaim November as Adoption Awareness Month in New Hanover County. FUNDING SOURCE: N%A ATTACHMENTS: Proposed proclamation. procadop. REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' AC r~Uiv 1 i WiY11Yt1~11~/ ' ~iPPROVED ~--~I~-re~~,; • REJECTED f`I . REMOVED ~ ;t t'OSTPONED ~ '~ ,ti FIiEARn ~ f~~ ~~;~~~~ .~.1.i„I~~ Ia~~ X I NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 PROCLAMATION 2 WHEREAS, all children need, love, support, security, and a place to call home; , WIiEREAS; in the County of New Hanover, 495 children live away from their families in substitute care; ~ ~ . WHEREAS, many of these children cannot return to their birth families and need the security and nurturing that a permanent family can provide;. WHEREAS, adoption is the"plan for permanency for 178 of these children;' WHEREAS, nearly all of these children have special needs because of physical or mental . or emotional disabilities, because they must be placed as a sibling group, because they are , , minorities, or because they are older; WHEREAS, between July 1, 1999 and June 30, 2000, thirty six New Hanover County children with special needs were permanently placed into adoptive homes; ` WHEREAS, there are families able and willing to adopt children with special needs; and ~. WHEREAS, children waiting for adoptive parents, and families who have adopted these` children require and deserve coinmunrty and public agency support; ~ ~` NOW, THEREFORE, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners, does hereby :.. proclaim November 2000 as "ADOPTION AWARENESS-MONTH IN NEW HANOVER .;. COITNTY." In honor of this event, we encourage`citizens, communityaagencies, religious. u organizations, businesses, and others to celebrate adoption, honor the families that grow, hrough . adoption, and focus attention on those children who live with the~burderi of an'uncertain future while they await permanent families. ~ -.. . , ..: ,, ., Adopted this the 13th of November 2000 K ..3 ;, ; William A. Caster Chairman ~ ,. Attest: ~ ~ , ~~` .' _ z _ , rx~r . Sztit~~? ~ , Lucie F.'Harrell, Clerk to~~~he~B~oard ~~~ - ~_ pSyy,A~} .. ~ ~ , ,.- .. G.J - ' . NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD. OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 5 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Engineering Presenter: Greg Thompson and Bruce Bowman (BMS) Contact:' Greg Thompson SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Bids for Judicial Expansion. Project BRIEF SUMMARY: On October 17, 2000, New Hanover County opened bids for the Judicial Expansion Project. On this project the multi•prime bids were less than single-prime bids. We are required by state bid laws to accept the lowest responsible bids whether they are multi-prime or single-prime.The low base bid for the project was the multi-prime bid package at $10,110.036. Additionally, the Architect and County staff have recommended that two alternates for street landscape, sidewalk improvements and street lighting be accepted for an additional $34,000, which would increase the construction budget to $10.144.036. This value represents an 11% increase above the estimated budget of $9.1 million. The required associated parking deck for this project will go out for bids in February 2001. The current estimate for this structure is $6.6 million. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approved the new construction budget of ' $10,144,036 and overall project budget as outlined in the latest estimate of probable cost which is $11,602,585. The approved construction budget will represent the total cost of construction including contingency. The Architect and County staff are confident .that through, value engineering and negotiations with. the .low bidders a savings in construction costs can be recognized that would not negatively impact the building or program and would provide, a construction contingency sufficient to cover any unforeseen cost. An estimate of probable cost has been prepared and included as part of this agenda item which details all of the projected cost associated with this project. FUNDING SOURCE: ,' COPS ATTACHMENTS: - r~UNT~ ~~I • Estimate of probable cost ~ APPROVED (~~ Letter from BMS ~;~_` EtEJECTED Q ,"~~ REMOVE® ~ ~ ,"<, ba01-16.w ~ POSTPONEDr~ ' y~s III=AR[~ ~ -<~ ~;~,~~:3~ REVIEWED BY: ~ ~~°~~ 1~~1.3. /~~~~~~- LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve `BUDGET. Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A C:UUN 1 T IVIANA(atK'S GVIVIIYItN I, ANU KtGUIViIVItNUAI IONS: Recommend approval of the following: ~ 'Award the contract to multi•prime bidders as detailed on bid sheet for a total amount of $10,144.036..- The budget amendment for this award reflects an increase of $3,649,743 for the total of $10,144,036:"~B.~Approve budget amendment for esign and. permitting fees in the amount of $243,467 w ~ will increase the total to $1,003,549. (~ C. Approve budget amendment for furniture, fixtures, and equi merit in the amount of $455,000.2 9 udget amendments and bid tabulation sheets are attached.Approval of this project will commit the County to constructing the parking deck,adjacent to the New Hanover County .. Headquarters Library. The estimate for the construction of the, parking deck is $6.6 million (excluding design, furniture and fixtures). "The third floor library renovation project will be bid as an alternate. The estimate for the construction of the library ovation project is $2,683,867 (excluding design, furniture and fixtures). COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: C7 • From: Cam Griffin on 11/08/2000 03:23 PM To: David Weaver/NHC@NHC, Pat Melvin/NHC@NHC cc: Subject: Agenda 11/13/00 If a question comes up on the amount of BA 01-16 ($4, 348,210) it is a follows: Increase in award $3,649,743 esin and permitting fees $243,467 furniture fixtures & equipment $455,000 $4,348,210 • Jew Hanover County Judicial Expansion Estimate of probable cost Construction Cost (Bids Received 10-17-00) Base Bids General Contract (Clancy & Theys) $6,948,000 Electrical Contract (LL .Vann) $1,61.5,000 036 107 1 $ Mechanical Contract (Humphrey Mechanical) , , . 000 X440 Plumbing Contract (Kelly Plumbing) _ , _____ 110,036 $1 0 subtotal Recommended Alternates(G2,E1) , , $34,000 Estimated Construction Contingency **** subtotal (Recommended Construction Package) __-_---------~~ $10,144,036 Rejected Alternates(G1,G3,E2,E3,E4) $523,100 Total Package including all Alternates $10,667,136 Design and Permitting Arch/Eng/programming/Interior(8% of construction) Original Fee $530,000 =Total Change Orders To Date 10-30-00 (#1,2,3,4) - _ ________ _$231 182_ ~ubtotal $761,182 Adjustment of base fee (8% of Construction) .~~107 522 - Subtotat (Adjusted contract value for BMS) $868,704 Reimbursable Expenses $60,000 ..Permitting fees - - ----_----...--.-_--._.-_.:~~74.845_ ------ --- - --- -- Total $1,003,549 . FF&E New Furniture $ 350,000 Refurbishing Existing ~ $75,000 Artwork $30,000 .subtotal --- ----455, 000 Total for recommended package $11, 602, 585 , ~.~ **** Construction Contingency to be established at a later date. Total for recommended package will ` not be impacted. _ ~' 31 .Print Date11/06/00 BMS ARCHITECTS, PC 514 MARKET STREET' PO BOX 3667 WILMINGTON, N.C. 26406-3667 PHONE 910 762-2621 FAX 910 762-8506 Mr. Andy Atkinson New Hanover County Deputy Manager 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 p ~ ~ [~ Il ;,,~ ,~ j~. j,;~ OCT 2 4 2000 - ENGiN i ' V v_ ."tii~j4'j_rlli October 24, 2000 . ., , RE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY JUDICIAL BUILDING EXPANSION Receipt 'of Bids and Recommendations _ , Dear Andy: ... ., Attached please find a copy of the Certified Bid Tabulation for this project. The low bids are comprised of the multi prime contracts as follows: Base Bids: ' General Contract -Base Bid Clancy and Theys Const Co - $6,948,000 , •. .Electrical Contract -Base Bid LL Vann Electric - $1,61 x,000 ' Mechanical Contract - Humphrey Mechanical - $1,107,036 ~- ' ~ ' .. . ,. Plumbing Contract Kelly Plumbing - $440,000 .. :. Total Base Bid Combined X10,110,036 } '. ~ - .. , .,. ~ In addition, we received bids for several general and electrical add alternates for work which was ' j . ~ .beyond our original scope. Please note that the selection of alternates -will not affect the low, bid ~ contractors. The following maintenance or elective„ upgrade alternates :can be performed ;under " '' ~ ~ separate contracts with Property Maintenance or IT rather than incorporated into the project. :; • Rejected Alternates: n ~ ~. " ~ Alt. G-1 +$58,300 Weatherproofing and sealant replacement : ' Alt. G-3 +326,000 Roof replacement ; Alt. E-2 +17,400 Transformer replacement - Historic'Courthouse , ' Alt. E-3 +24,200 Data Replacement -Existing Offices ' r , " Alt. E-4 +97,200 'Fire alarm replacement ~ '~ ° ~ "" ~'' ' "' ' '' ' We recommend that the county proceed with the scope in Alternate G-l and at least a modified ~ ": repair scope for Alternate G-3 under separate contracts in order, to make the existing buildings ~. weathertight and protect the new finishes.' .The' scope in electrical Alternates E-~ ~ and E-~• are `''elective and may be` pursued under separate contracts; if desired . :* :; ', Alternates G-2, E-1 and E-2 relate to improvements within the Third .Street and Princess Street , . right-of--ways consisting of sidewalk repair and replacement' `arid landscape and lighting ~' installation. This scope will dramatically improve the streetscape; of this important building site. These items could be deferred or rejected, however; we feel that it would be best if done in - conjunction with the project: Alternate E-2 replaces the pole mounted electrical transformer for the,. 32Historic Courthouse but is not necessary to complete ,the streetyard improvements." We.,therefore recommend accepting alternates G-2 'and E-1 only .' f ~ ~ a y ~:: ' ` HERBERT P. McKIM; FAIR Page 1 ~ '~ ROBERT W. SAWYER, FAIA BRUCE F. BOWMAN, AIA JOHN D. MURRAY, AIA -, GEORGE C. HEMINGWAY,'AIA ""' ~`: LOUIS P. DAVIS •3• Recommended Alternates: Alternate G-2 +$17,500 Streetyard landscape and sidewalk improvements Alternate E-1 +$16,500 Streetyard lighting Total of Recommended Alternates $34,000 Total of Base Bid and Recommended Alternates X10,144,036 Near the completion of the bid documents, we ordered a professional cost estimate which projected abase bid of just under 9 million with a construction budget of $9.1 million. The base bid by comparison came in at 11 % over budget. After analysis and some feedback from the low bid contractors, we find the costs associated with the engineering trades and the general conditions was under estimated. The uninterrupted owners use of the facility paired with a complex phasing and limitations- of working on a restricted downtown site drove up the project cost more than anticipated. Finish upgrades in the existing building also ran more than anticipated, but we believe are necessary to produce a finished appearance to the project. We have identified several areas for cost savings that will not dramatically affect the building program of approximately several hundred thousand dollars. We can also negotiate larger sums out of the project to approach the budget, however, this will call for deep cuts to the program impacting the users and will require changes to the building aesthetics. To conclude, the bids were competitive and fair market value for the scope of work. All of the low bid contractors are reputable firms with a good track record of similar projects with our firm. We therefore recommend negotiating with the low bid contractors. We don't believe rebidding the project with modified scope will generate any substantial savings over the negotiation process. Rebidding will also cause project delays. We believe the best solution will be a compromise of negotiating with the contractors in addition to reassessing the project budget. If the construction budget is increased from $9.1 to 10.1-million, we are confident that we can ri~gotiate a large enough sum to afford the recommended alternates and provide a construction contingency of 2% to be held in reserve. .This will also not require any deep cuts, that will negatively impact the building or program. We will present this position for consideration.at the November 13 commissioners meeting with the support of staff and will be ready and willing to proceed; however the commissioners direct. Sincerely, ~ ' BMS Arch' ts, PC L-- ~ . Bruce F. Bowman, AIA ~ BFB~;cs _ 33 , Enclosures XC Greg Thompson, Max Maxwell, Allen O'Neal . Page 2 - - .~ ivr:~ rlatvuv~;R COUNTY JUDICIAL BUILDING EXPANSION ~ MULTI PRIME PLUMBING AND HVAC CONTRACTORS BID TABULATION, October 17, 2000 @~ 2:00 NAME -PLUMBING LIC# BB MBE, BASE BID CULLUM CONST. 10379 5% X $522,000 KELLY PLUMBING 17298 5% X $440,000 ' NAME - HVAC LIC# BB ,. MBE = BASE BID BOLTON CORP. 13918 _ 5% .. ~X ~-~~ ~ - $1,297,000 CULLUM CONST. 10379 ~ 5% X ~ ' '-' ~ $1,418,000 " HUMPHREY MECH 07619 5% X $1,107,036 NORTH STATE MECH 17645 ~ 5% X $1,217,025 BAKER MECH NOT PRE UALIFTED 7 NOT READ .. 'J G ~Il ~ C ~ ~ s 0. a °~ a , 0 0 ~„ r E ~ ~ X _ ~ ~ Q E"' ~ J .~' Q C' IL ~ h CJ 61 a Ci ~ o ' a - U Q L "~ R U i a t ` ~ ~ F _c v a z x~Q 0 O "' F, ~ c7 U ~F C Q o .-] L: x Q H z 0 u a ~ ~, c` G Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ _ ~ 69 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ N ~~ N ~ 69 Eby ~ a o ~ 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ o N ~ .._. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ M ~ o0 r~ ~i ri c„~ ~ ' "~ W v3 tfi 4 'L.' 3 0 3~ o F ~ vi 0 0 ; u ' r `O V w w ~„ .-, c o °o ~ o o ° °o ~ F M o • ~ w ~ .a a ~ . 3 Q ~' "~ ~ C7 z ., o o Cn z Q ~ 0 O - O o ~„ ~ w W ~ ~ `° ~ o ~ ~, ca z .., Q ~ n ~ X X X CO ~ „a cr ~ G Q . o ° m~ ~ ~ s ~, s o Q ~, ~ ~ '" ~ V U ~ n ~~ ~ ~ _ N M I . ~ z w ~ N E- Q Q U W O a Q ~ z ~ F w a ~ .. a ~ z ~ ~ x u ° ° o Q .. L ti g F ..< . ~ ~ ~ O ~ O U Ca ., A ~ ca k, 0.' W z Q ~ w ~ ~ O U Q F z o U Q U [~ U w k~u17 ~Q w z w ,. w ('r ' ~ H ~: r--1 z 0 z Q ' ~ x W z Q a - . , ~ ~ a I Q .. c c ~ V ~--. Q '. ~ C G r r z a o ~ U G: > ~ C F O 36 ~ .a Q w F- C] ,. Z m VIb' `uewmog •,d aanag JC 8 Jd'S.LJ3I:IHJ21d SW9 uopepi9el P!9 Pail!uaa a s! s!4.L er o ~ W ° o °o p ., .a M . x ~ V N o0 a w F ~ ~ ~ o . a v ~ v ~~, x . ~_~ ~ J 1 LL' 0. ~ p f1. ~ ?~ F ~ ~ c ¢ v' V~ o ° o° S rn O ~ O a °~ Q d, ~o f ' c~ N v N O~ ~ N t7 c ~ Q ~` (~ O O O ~ ~ O. O C E" M ~D W ;y "'~ M M M M 9 CK ¢ O O ' w ~ ~ v M r ~ n~ ~ 7 3 ~~ E~ 03~ O ° o ° O ° ~~ o ,,, o N Q C W t y N O O O 'p z p0 M N O 00 O V~ O ~ ~„, .~ „~ ci ~r' ~d ~ _ t~ °o O O Q ~ N N ~ a o O `~' g E F v y Q 3 N ~ r g S S' S o 0 0 ~ o o ~ W a ~ . , ~ . O o oo p M . W ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ w w ~ x x ~ .:~ • k X X X •~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? S ~ ap _~ _ F •.. ~• ."~ ~ ? ] ~ a °` ~ o ~ ~. A. V ~ - ~ w u ~ w ~ w Z z ~ F z ~. ua . w ~ ~ --~ ¢ x U¢ ~l .. ~ W W ~~~j w ~ ~ ~ ~ U ¢ ~ ~ W ~ p ~ 4 Q O .-l x C ~ .-7 Q, z w u u ca z u a' 3 t ~... i .. . ~, .. F.. ~. ~+ ' el ~. ,;' . L a, t. N 't } a ~. ~ . ' !.. y ~' a i ~ ~ e ~ r c {3r ~ . } ~ ~ r . { rte. ~`+ 'I '~+ ~ , , ~ . . ., ; t ~fl j 1 :1; 9 ~ - ~ .. ~, s _ . ` • w '~~ ~ j '~ t.. . ~ f I, .. . . ' F NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . Meeting Date: 11!13/00 Budget Amendment DEPARTMENT: Judicial Building Capital Project BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 2001-16 ADJUSTMENT COPS Financing Capital Project Expense DEBIT $4,348,210 CREDIT $4,348,210 EXPLANATION: To increase budget to amount of estimates to complete construction. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners {This page intentionally left blank} NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 • • Regular Item #: 6 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Legal Presenter: Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney Contact: Wanda M. Copley; County Attorney SUBJECT: Election of Board of Directors for the New Hanover County Financing Corporation. BRIEF SUMMARY: The Board needs to elect three (3) Directors to the board of the New Hanover County Financing Corporation. The three (3) directors will elect officers (President, Secretary, Treasurer) at the annual meeting.November 27, 2000 at 8:30a.m. in .Room 301 of the New Hanover County Administration Building. The current directors are: Allen O'Neal, Bruce Shell and B~~ ~-~~~ Bi~~+ !n 1997, the New Hanover County Financing Corporation was formed under the North Carolina Non-Profit Corporation Act, to, among other things, assist the County in the financing of fhe purchase of essential real property, the construction of essential improvements and the purchase of essential personal property. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS. Recommend the Board of Commissioners select three (3) Board of Directors for the New Hanover County Financing Corporation. The Directors will elect officers to take place on November 27, 2000. FUNDING SOURCE• n/a ATTACHMENTS: no REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend appointment of the New Hanover County Financing Corporation Board of Directors. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS:" ~OUNi~ PONIAal~9Q APPROVED ~'~,/~ `~ REJECTED Q ~~' : REMOVED q (Q] PQSTPONED 1~ `'''~t r'~„ ~~J ~ HEARD ~; .." _ :,. NEW HANOVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM: VIA FACSIMILE TO: New Hanover County Commissioners FROM: Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney RE: Appointment of Directors to the New Hanover County Financing Corporation DATE: November 6, 2000 On November 13th, you will be selecting the directors for the New Hanover County Financing Corporation while the Board of Directors will choose the three (3) officers: President, Secretary, and Treasurer at the annual meeting on November 27th The Board of Commissioners needs to recommend individuals for each of these positions. Currently the President is Allen O'Neal, the Treasurer is Bruce Shell, and the Secretary is Buzz Birzenieks. • Please contact me should you have any questions. WMC/kc attachments cc: County Manager Deputy County Manager Finance Director Clerk to the Board ~~ ~~ ' ~ . Public Notice Public Notice is hereby given that the New Hanover County Financing Corporation will hold a meeting on November 27, 2000 at 8:30a.m. in Room 301 of the New Hanover County Administration Building, 320 Chestnut Street, Wilmington, North Carolina. The purpose of this meeting will be to hold the annual meeting of the New Hanover County Financing Corporation and to elect officers for the corporation. Lucie F. Harrell, Clerk New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Date: November 16, 2000 n LJ . , . 4 .~: ,, Public Notice • Public Notice is hereby given that the New Hanover Count Financin Y 9 Corporation will hold a special meeting on November 27, 2000 at 8:30a.m. in Room 301 of the New Hanover County Administration Building, 320 Chestnut Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, for the purpose of authorizing the execution, delivery and sale of Certificates of Participation, Series 2000. Lucie F. Harrell, Clerk New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Date: November 16, 2000 • • NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 .7 • i~ Contact: Neal Lewis % Dexter Hayes Regular Item #: 7 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes / Neal Lewis SUBJECT: Middle Sound Access Grant Contract BRIEF SUMMARY: The County has recently been notified of our grant award of $100,000 for the acquisition of a much needed neighborhood access on the northern side of Howe Creek at 2639 Middle Sound .Loop Rd. The site will provide pedestrian access, canoe/kayak landing, and limited parking. No boat ramp is proposed. A portion of the site already provides water access for several adjacent property owners. Because the site will also provide for water quality protection/enhancement through the preservation of the wetland areas, the Tidal Creek Watershed Management Advisory -Board and the Clean Water Trust Fund have also agreed to our use of $100,000 of those funds. The County's required cash match will be $75,000. Final cost for the property will be based upon a competent appraisal. Adjoining property owners have been notified. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: - Accept grant and authorize Chairman to sign contract and resolution for graht award Approve associated BA #2001-15 FUNDING SOURCE: Division of Coastal Management Waterfront Access Program $100,000 Clean Water Trust Fund Grant $100,000 County Cash Match from Fund Balance $75,000' ATTACHMENTS: Contract Maps of Site Draft Resolution BA #2001-15.wpd REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: N/A FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A Recommend approval COMMISSIONERS' ACTIO COMMENTS: ~o, :;t APPROVED ."~"' :. ~:'k REJECTED Q _ -:~:: ~~ !REMOVED ~ '" - ~~. , . ~' POSTPONED ~~~ '`"~ `'~ ~ FIEAR(7 ~.~.,~ ~fC,~1~3,~~o~oj~J~ 41 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF. COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Budget Amendment " DEPARTMENT: Tidal Creeks Water Quality Project BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 2001-15 ADJUSTMENT Water Quality Enhancement Strategy: Waterfront Access~Grant Transfers In/General Fund Capital Project Fees - ~~~ ~ , County Commissioners: ~ ' Appropriated Fund Balance -- Non-Departmental: Transfer To Other Funds: ~ . ., .Transfer To Clean Water Management $75,000 ~, .. ' EXPLANATION: To budget a $100,000 grant award received for a Howe Creek neighborhoody ~ ~ . access (northern side) on Middle Sound Loop Road. The Tidal Creek Watershed Management Advisory Board and the Clean Water Trust Fund have also awarded $100,000 since the site will, , provide water quality protection and preservatiori of the wetlands. New Hanover County's - required cash match will be $75,000. Final cost will be based upon an appraisal. . ~ . t ~. ,. . ,, .. . ' ~ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: To date furid balance has been appropriated in the amount of ~ . $3,532,116. Of this amount, $3,486,116 is due~to funds being rolled over for projects not ' completed in FY 99-00. ~ ~ '', ` If all budget amendments on this agenda are approved, fund balance appropriated will increase by ~ ~ '~ _.- ... ...J 5 ~. ~ t "' $195,401 to '$3,727,517. Changes are as follows: .`~~ ' "~' ~ ` ' Tidal Creeks Water Quality Project (BA #2001-15) -Increase By $ 75,000 Community Oriented Policing Services Grant (BA #01-0063) -Increase By :150,000 :; "' ~~ ~ `' ~~;. °, ~ # ., . " °''; Sale of Land (BA #01-0065) -Decrease By ~:. ;~;: ~, -29,599 . ~ f .._ _ . •. _.. APPROVAL STATUS: To be a roved b Board Of Commissioners ~ ;'s - ,~ ~ pp Y - (`~ ~j :~'~ounl~r roMl~iS~re~ ~~ . ' ~~~ REJECTC~. ~ ~; .,4 ;. ` ~ t``j C~ 'U~~~~ ~ POST'PO.NED G 42~ s_~~ ~ ~a~f~~ ..v._.:_ , , ., ., .... . DEBIT CREDIT ,.. $100,000 .. , $75,000 .. . $175,000 ' $75,000 - ~ .. .~... ®~` '' .. 753•. .~ 1 'j^t September 18, 2000 ~~~~~~BILL HOLMAN =,~SEGRETARY -~' ~x.g sx.::s-- ~ }~ '~ -3 _,. .~., ~uI ~ ~ y.~ n l"y+u, ~ i r ~~. ~~ ~ , ;n 1 . , ,3 r ~, ~:, - J~k ; ~° J' ~~ ~.~ ~-~. ti&. _. { -rte a'i~'a~~;."~~~~ ~, ~ ~~r ?~~,~ ~~ t } 'EnY.LYdF~4r~ ~ 2~~~{ ~i Mr. Patrick Lowe 'NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Assistant Planning Director. New Hanover County Planning Department 414 Chestnut Street, Suite 304 Wilmington, NC 28401 Dear Mr. Lowe: Congratulations on the recent announcement by Governor Hunt that your local government has been awarded a grant of $100,000 through the NC Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program. The Division of Coastal Management will assist you in administering this grant. Enclosed are two copies of the contract for your Middle Sound Access project. Please sign both and return one to Chris Pope, Division of Coastal Management, 1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1638, along with a resolution authorizing your local government to enter into the grant agreement. Because the grant award is not final until the contract is executed, it is important for you to return a copy with the resolution as quickly as possible: Remember that any applicable state permits must be obtained before you begin any actual construction. The contract period is October 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001. Note that the project should be completed just as it was described in your proposal unless modified by mutual agreement. Also note that all contracts from the state include a provision that local governments must comply with the Davis-Bacon Act, a federal law requiring that detailed wage and hour records be maintained and submitted upon request. For more information, contact the NC Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division at 919-733-2152. The Division of Coastal Management looks forward to working with you to complete this project. If you have any questions concerning your grant, please contact Alex Marks in our Wilmington office at 910-395-3900. Sincerely, Donna D. Moffitt ~~ cc: Alex Marks Attachment: Access Sample Resolution , MAILING: 1638 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA,27699.1638 PHYSICAL: 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604 ' PHONE: 819-733-2293 FAX: 919-7,33-1495 ' AN ~EgUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SOyo RECYCLED / 1030 POST-CONSUMER PAPER -'^ ~ ~ ~ DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: 1-877-623-6748 ~k~o~ ~oo-~ ~avnos ~7ao~W _ NCDENR/DIVISIO~ OF COASTAL l~i.aNAGEnfE~T PLBLIC EEACH ADD CO.aSTAL ~~'ATERFRO;~T ACCESS PROGRAM SAMPLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LOCAL GOVERNMENT E~.ECUTION OF A PUBLIC ACCESS GRANT CONTRACT MINUTES OF.A REGULAR MEETING OF THE (Local Governing Board) of (County/Town of_ 1, North Carolina. A regular meeting of the (Local Governing Board) of the (County/Town of`~ was held in the (Location), the regular meeting place, on (Month, Day, Year). There were (~tumber) of (Commissioners, Council Members, Aldermen) present. ' The (Local Governing Board) was advised that a proposed contract between the (County/Town of_~ and the North Carolina Department of Environment aril Natural Resources for the provision of Public Access grant funds was presented and discussed; that, under the terms of the said contract, the (County/Town of )will pay a total of (Local Cash Match) as its local share of the total project costs. BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE (Local Governing Board) of the (County/Town of ): 1) That the contract between the (Countv/7'own of) and the North.Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources be and the same is hereby approved. 2) That the (Chairman/Nfayor) and the Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to sign and execute • the said contract for and on behalf of the (County/Town of_J and forward the same to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 3) That upon final execution, a copy of said contract be filed with the minutes. Upon motion of (ClZairmanlNlayor), seconded by (Commissioner, Alderman, Councilmember), -said resolution was passed unanimously. I; (1Vame), Clerk of the (County/Town ofd, North Carolina do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy, of so much of the proceedings of the (Local Governing Board) at a meeting held on (Montle, Day, fear) as related to the contract between the (Countv/7'own of) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, relative to the public access project for the (Counh:/Town of_~, North Carolina. WITNESS my hand and the corporate seal of the said.(County/Town of_J, North Carolina this the day of , 19 ' (SEAL) • ~~ (Clerk Signature) ~ ~- ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Pro ram Contract No. BA00-O1 Project Sponsor: New Hanover County ; Project Location: Middle Sound Access Project Type: Neighborhood AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of this 18~' day of September. 2000. by and between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (hereinafter called the DEPARTMENT) and New Hanover County (hereinafter called the CONTRACTOR). ~' , ~. ' WITNESSETH THAT: , WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has been charged with the responsibility of developing. a comprehensive ' public beach access program, pursuant to Part 6 of Article 7 of Chapter 113A of the North Carolina General Statutes, entitled the Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Probaram; and ~ ~ ' WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has been designated as the recipient of funds provided by the North. Carolina General Assembly and the U.S. Department of Commerce, and. authorized to award grants to local governments for the purpose of funding a public access program to assure acquisition, construction and maintenance ` of.a system of pedestrian public access to ocean beaches, estuarine water beaches, and .other public trust waters. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:. , . _, ~ , „ , I. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION . .~ ;. . ~ A. _ Contact Person for CONTRACTOR: a ` /// Mr. Patrick Lowe. ~ . Assistant Planning Director ~ ... - _ 414 Chestnut Street, Suite 304 ~ " ,; '..° ,Wilmington, NC 28401-4027 910-341-7165 _. B. Project Name/Location (Type): ', . •- . , Middle Sound Access (Neighborhood) . . C. Period Covered by this Agreement: ~ , . Constructionlacquisition to be done under this contract shall commence on or after October 1, 2000. • and shall be completed no later than December 31, 2001 unless the completion date is.extended by an amendment to this contract ~: ~ - ~ ~ • s ,,, . . ~• , D. Project Description: ~'' Land acquisition of 2639 Middle Sound Loop Rd to provide access to Howe Creek. ; , ,'` .,J 4S ,~ < < ;~ .. ., " ~~ ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Pro ram Contract No. BA00-O1 E. Project State Covered by this Agreement: This agreement is in effect until the project is 100% completed, inspected and aclose-out letter is received by the local government from the DEPARTMENT. F. Project Funding: Grant Amount = $100,000 ; Local Cash Match = $75,000 Local In-Kind Match = $95.000 Total Project Cost = $270,000 G. Project Conditions: 1. Following the property acquisition; the Contractor shall provide the Division of Coastal Management with a Title Opinion indicating that the property is in public ownership. Final payment from the 'Department maybe withheld until the Title Opinion has been received. 2. Each project will be consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. 3. No construction is to occur prior to the receipt of all required local, state, and federal permits. Coordination and consultation with permitting agency personnel shall occur so as to afford the least amount of .impact on coastal resources. 4. .Authorized improvements and costs will comply with the grant application submitted to and approved by the DEPARTMENT and are limited to the above stated project location unless prior approval is received from the DEPARTMENT. ' 5. Unauthorized changes in the project (from the approved site plan, budget. and other material submitted with final grant application) will be sufficient cause for the reduction of grant funds at the sole discretion 'of the DEPARTMENT. Changes not deemed substantial may be made at the discretion of • . the Division of Coastal Management District Planner. 6. Grant payment for any type of contract work will require quarterly subnuttal.of appropriate itemized documentation to the DEPARTMENT showing ail charges incurred for each individual project. 7. Project will be completed and closed out prior to the project termination date, as specified in this .contract, in compliance with the conditions of this contract. 8. The CONTRACTOR shall install CAMA public access signs at the project site(s). The DEPARTMENT will provide these signs at no cost to the CONTRACTOR. 9. Future improvements, modifications, or changes to the project site will be subject to full review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. This will include any changes which require permits or any modifications (reductions or additions) to recreational amenities. Unapproved changes to the project site may not be allowed and will be cause for the DEPARTMENT to seek repayment of previously . committed/granted funds for site acquisition and improvements. ~- ~ 49 ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Pro ram Contract No. BA00-Q1 II. PROJECT EXECUTION A. The DEPARTMENT and CONTRACTOR mutually enter this Agreement in accordance with Article 7A.of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes, N.C.G:S. 113A-134.1 et seq., the Public Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program; and agree to comply with the terms, promises, conditions, plans; specifications, estimates, procedures, project proposals, maps and assurances submitted in conjunction with the project proposal for the above referenced Project Agreement. ' ~ .~ B. The CONTRACTOR agrees to execute and complete the approved project in'accordance with the time - schedule set forth under I.C., (page 1). Failure to render"satisfactory progress or to complete this or any other project under this program to the satisfaction of the DEPARTMENT maybe cause for the suspension of all obligations of the DEPARTMENT under this agreement. C. Construction contracted for or performed by the CONTRACTOR shall meet the following requirements: 1. Public building contracts shall comply with the requirements of Article 8 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes, and all other requirements placed on local governments: ~ . 2. Amendments to contracts for construction shall be by written change order only. Such change orders shall be issued after approval of the DEPARTMENT, shall be made a part of the project file, and shall be kept available for audit. - ` . .. • 3. The CONTRACTOR agrees to incorporate, or cause to be incorporated into all construction contracts the following provisions: "During the performance of this contract, the CONTRACTOR agrees as . 'follows: ~ _ ~ .. " ~ .. ,,. .~. . "a. The CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, or national origin. The CONTRACTOR will take affirmative action ~~ to ensure that applicants are employed, and that •employees are treated during employment, without ` ' regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin. Such- action shall include, but not be limited to, ~. the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment ' advertisina• la off or termination; rates of ~~a or other forms ~ ~~ ~ ' • ~, y p y of compensation; and selection for ` . training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, .' `."' •~ available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the , CONTRACTOR~setting forth the provisions of this non=discrimination clause. ` "b. The CONTRACTOR will; in all solicitations or advertisements for employees_placed by or on ~ ~ .' .behalf of the CONTRACTOR, state'that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for ,, , . " employment without regard to race, .creed, color, or national origin.. _ -" ' D. The CONTRACTOR agrees to secure completion pf the work in accordance with the approved construction .~:~ '';`,~ plans and specifications, and shall secure compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and ' -. .. .. regulations, including the State Building Code. ~ ~ •• ~ ~ ' . .. , • , . .. ,,. _. E. The CONTRACTOR agrees to permit periodic site visits by the DEPARTMENT to insure work progress m ~; s:-l accordance with the approved project, including a final inspection upon project completion: • .. r • F. In the event funds should not be available for future stages of the project, the CONTRACTOR agrees to ' `. ~ : ` ~omplete the project to a degree of usefulness as a public water access agreed upon by the DEPARTMENT. ` , ublic.Beach and. Coastal Waterfront Access Pro ram Contract No. BA00-01 G. AlI significant deviations from the project proposal shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT for prior . approval. H. Develo ment Tans ands ecifications shall be available for review b the DEPARTMENT u P P P y pon request. I: The acquisition cost or fair market value of real property including interest in donated lands shall be based ~'~ upon the appraisal of a competent appraiser: The appraisal reportsshall be reviewed and approved by the DEPARTMENT. - J. If any. tract or parcel of, or interest in, real property subject to being purchased under the provisions of this agreement, but not identified herein, is found by the DEPARTMENT for any reason not to be suitable, all obligations of the DEPARTMENT hereunder shall cease as to such parcel, tract, or interest. K. Project Administration „ 1. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly submit such reports as the DEPARTMENT may request. 2. Property and facilities acquired or developed pursuant to this agreement shall be available for inspection - by the DEPARTMENT upon request. ~ _. III. REIIvIBURSEIvIENT OF PROJECT COSTS ' A.. The CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain and make available at proper times to the DEPARTMENT all bid documents, and accurate records of all expenditures for costs applicable to this agreement, and to submit pioperly certified billings for such costs on forms prescribed by the DEPARTMENT and supported by detailed data sheets which will facilitate the audit of the CONTRACTOR'S records. Complete accounting records, including original invoices, payrolls, contracts, or other documents clearly showing the nature and property of all costs incurred under this agreement, shall be retained by the CONTRACTOR for a period of three years following project completion or ..until an audit has been completed, whichever is later. All accounting records and supporting documents will clearly " show the number of the project to which they are applicable. B. The DEPARTMENT agrees to reimburse to the CONTRACTOR only for costs actually incurred by the ' CONTRACTOR under the terms of this Project Agreement., Should the total costs of the~project eitceed the Project ~ . , Cost stated in LF. (page 2), the DEPARTMENT shall reimburse the CONTRACTOR only for the excess attributable ' . to change orders approved by the DEPARTMENT. ` C. The CONTRACTOR agrees to refund to the DEPARTMENT, subsequent to audit of the project financial ' records by the DEPARTMENT, any.funds not expended in the completion of the project under the terms of tlie, _.: above referenced Project Agreement: ,.~ D. Project costs eligible for assistance shall be determined upon the basis of the criteria set forth by the ` ' ;; . DEPARTMENT. - _. . 51 . ~ - .. ..... ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program '" ~ Contract No.. BA00=01 ~ ``, N: PROTECT TERMWATION " . A. This agreement may be rescinded, modified or amended only by written agreement executed by all parties hereto. .. , " - B. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to comply. with the terms of this agreement or any similar agreemment may be cause for the suspension of all obligations of the DEPARTMENT hereunder. , . , C. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to comply with the terms of this agreement shall not be cause for the suspension of all obligations of the DEPARTMENT hereunder if; in the judgment of xhe DEPARTMENT, such , .failure was. due to no fault of the CONTRACTOR. ` Insuch case; any amount required.tosettle at. minimum"costs any irrevocable obligations properly incurred shall be eligible for assistance:under this agreement. .' ~ . V. RETENTION. OPERATION. MAINTENANCE, AND USE ,. A. .Purpose. The standards which apply to-the retention, operation, maintenance; and use of properties and facilities acquired or developed with grant assistance are contained in this section. . , ,. .. _ ,. .: - ~~ B. The CONTRACTOR agrees to operate and maintain solely at its own expense;~insofar as it is legally empowered to do so, for as long as they exist, the facilities and" areas- covered by this agreement. C. Retention and Use. Property acquired or developed with grant assistance shall be retained and used for public access. The CONTRACTOR agrees to transfer title to any real property acquired with the grant funds to the ~ ' DEPARTMENT if the local government uses the property fora purpose other~than public access:" .~ ~'': ' .; ... -. ~. . ~ ..i_ _ ,. ~, .. - ,' . D:. , Operation and Maintenance Property acquued or developed with grant assistance shall be operated and. ' ._ ., maintained as follows: ~ . ..: ; , . ,~ `: . , ., _, ... ~ + . • ,1.: The.property shall be maintained m.such a`mann`er'that the Department finds it to appear attractiwe'and ' , ... ~ . , . ."inviting to the public. ~:. , ' ~ ~._ , .. - T. . , ~~ - , ,. .; .. ~. r. ;, .. ,. ..-. v .{ ,~~ 2. Sanitation shall be kept at reasonable standards for public use. Fire protection, and other similar , ~ , ` amtained in accordance «ith a lice - services shall be m pp abl e DEPARTMENTAL and local public health • standards. , .... , . _ :ti _~' ~ } ~ '" , - .. .. _ . ttr} I ' ' 3. Properties shall be kept reasonably safe for`public use. ° The CONTRACTOR shall determine the level .,, , - ,; " of maintenance and supervision necessary`to maintain the"facility in.a safe condition.'`- .. _. - - :~ 4. • ::Buildings, roads,, and~other structures and improvements shall be kept inreasonable,repair throughout - p ~ ' erioration and not.to discourage..public user ~ ' :> their estimated lifetime, so as to revert undue det ` . S. , Buildings; roads, and:other. strictures and improvements shall be kept open'for public use at'reasonable " hours and times of the year, according to the type;of area or facility. ," ~ . + '., ,..°~:. u. ~' ,,_": E. Availabili~ to Users. Property acquued o, ~ v~loped with .grant assistance shall be open to entry and use by all persons, regardless of race, color, creed, nationia origin, or residence who are otherwise eligible according to ' reasonable published rules applicable to the property involved."' " .. - - ~~ 52 , - , - ;, ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Pro ram Contract No: BA00-O1 F. Basic Chances in Recreational Use. The use of property acquired or developed with grant assistance may .not be changed from that contemplated and approved when assistance was obtained, unless approval is obtained from the DEPARTMENT. G. Reasonable Use Limitations. The CONTRACTOR may impose reasonable limits on the type and extent of use of areas and facilities acquired or developed with grant assistance when such a limitation is necessary for . maintenance or preservation. Thus, by way of example, limitations may be imposed on the number of persons using. an area or facility. All limitations shall be in accord with the applicable grant agreement and amendments. .{ . H. Use of Proceeds of Sales. The proceeds of sale of assisted. areas and faciIities~must be held by the ,. DEPARTMENT or the CONTRACTOR and be disposed of only in accordance with a plan approved by the DEPARTMENT. • I. Notice of Limitations of Use and Restrictions. The CONTRACTOR and/or owner of the real property acquired or improved with grant funds awarded under this agreement shall file, in the office of the Register of Deeds in the county or counties where such property is situated, a Notice of Limitation of Use and Restrictions which sets forth the land use restrictions contained in this agreement. VI. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Conflict of Interest 1. No official or employee of the CONTRACTOR who is authoriied in his official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, approve, or take part in such decisions regarding a contract or subcontract in connection with this project shall have any financial or other personal interest in any such contract or subcontract. 2. No person performing services for the CONTRACTOR in connection with this project shall have±a financial or other personal interest other than his employment or retention by the CONTRACTOR in any contract or subcontract in connection with this project. No officer or employee of such person , retained by the CONTRACTOR shall have.any financial or other personal interest in any real property acquired for this project unless such interest is openly disclosed upon the public records of the .CONTRACTOR, and such officer, employee or person has not participated in the acquisition for or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR. . 3: The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for enforcing the above conflict of interest provisions. ` r B. Nondiscrimination . 1. The- CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, or national ~~ origin in the use of any property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this agreement... ~ - 2. The' CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of residence, except to the extent that reasonable difference in admission or other fees maybe maintained on the basis of residence. tion . - ... ; . .:. C. Flood Disaster Protec The CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with -the terms and intent.of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of .. ,1973 (Public Law 93-234) and all applicable regulations and procedures implementing that Act. • . -. , 53 ... , ublic Beach and Coastal Waterfront Access Program Contract No. BA00-O1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the DEPARTMENT and the CONTRACTOR have executed this contract in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each of the parties, the day and year first above written. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Bill Holman, Secretary i .. By Department Head's Signature or Authorized Agent ~~ ViTI'INESS f~ {This page intentionally left blank} ,~~, ~ _ ~}: _, ,. ... ,.'. ,_~,,~r-::r~ ~ - ~ , ~ , ~ . :;. ~T• 1 ~~ ~~ • 1 56 ~, ~.: ~~ . ~~ ~. ..N NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 8.1 Estimated Timer Page Number: Department: TAX .Presenter: Robert Glasgow Contact: Robert Glasgow SUBJECT: Appeal of Exemption Denial for Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Wilmington - 4306 Spirea Drive.- Map #R06101-006.008-000 BRIEF SUMMARY: The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Wilmington requested an exemption under GS 105.278.3 "Real and Personal property used for Religious Purposes". The request for exemption was denied by the Tax Department on 1/11/00. The denial was based on item #3 of the application which states "for the construction of buildings and parking areas for the conducting of religious services and education." This statute requires the property to be "wholly and exclusively used for religious purposes" as of January 1 of the tax year being apphied for.. The intended or anticipated use does not qualify,for exemption. Soon after the exemption disapproval was provided to the fellowship, " it was identified that the person living in the house was payirig $250.00 a month for rent and providing janitorial services to the fellowship. GS 105.278.3 does make provisions for the exemption of property which is provided for janitorial or custodial services as long as it is occupied gratuitously. , APPELLANT'S ARGUMENT: The property should be exempt from taxation due to future development of the property as stated. in item #3 of the application and in later correspondence it was identified that the fellowship received $250 a month in reduced rent from an individual that . performed part time janitorial services for the fellowship which- should qualify the property for a religious tax exemption. TAX DEPARTMENT'S ARGUMENT: There are no provisions within NCGS to provide for tax exemption for future or intended use. For real and personal property to qualify for tax exemption it must be in use on January 1 of the tax year and wholly and exclusively used for religious purposes. The housing of a janitor or custodian that provides these services and where property is located in proximity to the exempt facility is allowed, as long as it is "occupied gratuitously by one other than the owner grid wholly and exclusively used by the occupant for religious, charitable, non-profit educational, literary, scientific, or cultural purposes. The North Carolina Department of Revenue was questioned about this specific situation. The response from Mr. David Baker, Valuation Specialist, "providing custodial or janitorial housing must be gratuitous to qualify for exemption. The fact that the fellowship is charging $250.00 per month rent " " disqualifies them from the exemption." RECOMMENDED MOTION AND. REQUESTED ACTIONS• It is recommended that the Tax Department's denial of the exemption be upheld based on North i., '; Carolina General Statutes. . FUNDING SOURCE: ._ - APPROVED ~~'''~ 'REJECTED ~ ~'"', REMOVED ~ ~ " , POSTPONED ~'.`~-'~ ~' 5 7 ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW ~ . .F -' ,f, .r..- ., COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATI S: Concur with the Tax Administrator to deny. exemption. COMMISSIONERS'ACTIONS/COMMENTS:,' . ~ `'rh ... r' , • - , .. zt r `~ ti - ... .. ~~ «l ,, , . ., ;; .:, ~. . . r ,... ay ,. ~_ ~, .,'. , ~. . S ;„ , ~ . . ., , , .. - .. ., . ~. ~ ., ~ r r'' . ,. . ,a 4. •S,. .- a .. . ~ .. _ f f . ~ } , t ti' t t . r i d ~ y ,i , i f ,. ,. r ~ .. ~ . ,. ' 4 ,'~ ~ IN 5 $ _ i ; g~ j~ p yg~ ' Y ~~~~~~ - 58 ~ ~ . ~, ~. - - ~~: . ,: ltalit'slt'f C CI_ASCOW 'l'ax Adwinistruux October 1 G, 2000 1~1L` WV i.1L-~l~l~J V .Ll'C ~.~Ul'01 Y Y .TAX ADMINISTRATION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTI-I CAROLINA 28401-4090 TELEPHONE. (91 U) 341-7131 I'AX (~10) 341-44)S Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Wilmington, North Carolina 4313 Lake Avenue Wilmington, NC 2Bd03 Re: Appeal of Property Tax Exemption - 4306 Spirea Dr. (1206101-OOG-00£3-000) Dear Sir: Your appeal~of the denial of property tax exemption for the above referenced property has been scheduled to be heard by the New I-lanover County Board of County Commissioners on Monday, November 13 during the evening session. 1'he appeal will be heard in Assembly Room, New Hanover County t-listoric Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Room 301,'Wilmington, NC. When a definite time has been established, you will be notified. The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to provide evidence that the denial of the exemption is not in keeping with North Carolina General Statutes. The denial of your request has been reviewed by the New I-lanover County Legal Staff and has concurred with the denial. Historically, such appeals have been denied by the Board, since the General Statutes are very specific on what constitutes eligibility far a religious exemption. Should you have any documentation which you would like to present to the Board, it should be provided this office by Tuesday, October 3'I, 2000. Documentation which .has not been provided by that date will probably not be entertained by the Board. Any questions you Dave, should be directed to the undersigned. Sincerely, Robert C. Glasgow Tax Adniinistrator cc: Mr. ~Gharles D. Morison t ROUf:RTC. GLASGOW Tax Administrator February 15, 2000 NEW I~ZANOVER CO TAX ADMINISTRATION 320 CHCSTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 `T'ELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 FAX (910) 341-4495 Mr. Charles D. Morison 16090 US Highway 17 P.O. Box 1184 Hampstead, NC 28443 Re: Request for Exemption -Parcel R06101-006-008-000 Dear Mr. Morison: This is in response to your letter of February 7, 2000, requesting exemption for the referenced property on behalf of the owner Unitarian Universalist~Fellowship. . On January 11, 2000, this office denied the exemption for this property based o'n information contained within the AV-10 Form filed by the Fellowship. Item #3 of the AV .~ 10 stated "For the construction of buildings and parking areas for the conducting of ~ ' religious services:and.education." The General Statutes provide for exemptions for property which iswholly and exclusively used For religious worship"or instruction iri' ' religious education. The building; on the referenced property, was occupied at the time of the visit to the property. The request was denied according to General Statutes which do not make provisions to exempt property for intended future use. ~ " In your letter of February 7, it indicates -the building is occupied by a part time custodian ~ ~~ ;~: for the fellowship, vvho pays $250.00"a ~month'ren't to the fellowship. It'is iTmy opinion ands :. that of the North Carolina Department of Revenue that this lase does not~fulfill'the ~ .: "~~~ 4f' requirement as stipulated in General Statute 105-278.3 (d)(1). Specifically, charging rent in the amount of $250, a month indicates that income is generated from use of the property. = ~ ,~ 3 As a result of ,the second denial of request for exemption for Parcel #fR06106-006-008 0001 ;. 1 located at 4306 Spirea Drive, I will schedule the appeal of this decision before the Board ~~: -:, ,.?j of Equalization and Review, as requested in your letter. You will be notified when th'e ~ " ~ ~ , < :J appeal will be heard. - °J a, Sincerely, ,~ ~.~.. .. . • ~w H:.~vovE~ c®~~r~ TAX'ADMINISTRATION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 - FAX (910) 341-4495 RODERT C. GLASGOW Tax AdminisUalor January 11, 2000 Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Wilmington, North Carolina 4313 Lake Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Request for Property Tax Exemption - 4306 Spirea Dr. (R06101-006-008-000) Dear Sir: `Your request for exemption of the property located at 4306 Spirea Drive, Wilmington, is not approved for the year 2000. - • Within in your application for property tax exemption item ~k 3 indicates "For the .construction of kiuildings and parking areas for the conducting of religious services and • education." General Statute 105-278.5 (a) (4) state's property must be "Wholly and . exclusively used for: a. Religious worship or b. Purposes of instruction in religious education." A visit to the property on January 10, 2000 indicated that the property was being used as a residence. • It is my opinion that the property is not being used wholly and exclusively for religious purposes as of January 1, 2000, and does not qualify for exemption. You have the right to appeal this decision to the New Hanover County Board of County . Commissioners. Should you wish to appeal this decision, please notify this office and a ~ ~ date will be scheduled for you to present evidence that the property was being used for - ".religious purposes as of January 1, 2000. ~ - . •.~ SnceretY, ,`~ , , GL,a ~ _ . obert C. Glasgow Tax Administrator xm AV-.10 tev. 4-94) YEAR ~ CU n ~> AP,~PLIC)AT~i~ON FOR PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION / - 1 CountyLY~~[:2~ /7a'`'Ja~)G/~F~ To-w'n or City ~ly~//, TG'J -. ~., (Slreot Or Route) ~ own) / _ // - - (State) (Zip Code) ~:' !/ Location of Property INSTRUCTIONS Inder the provisions of G. S. 105-282.1 every owner o1 property claiming exemption or exclusion Irom property taxes must demonstrate that the property teats the statutory requirements for exemption or classification. Claims for exemption or exclusion must be filed with the Assessor of the county in Which the property .is located. (see reverse side) Claims for exemption should include all land and improvements and personal property situated thereon nd complete Information regarding Its use. e undersigned owner or authorised representative hereby petitions for exemption of the following described propert .~ ~ IQ ~/ ii i/ Give complete description of property: =~' ~~~!`/% / ~/~~ ~A II f• Land: , ~ Q(, ~' rip ° o f Improvements: ~ ~ gssic* Personal list and expJn the purposes for which the property is used: Land: -__l__"I1/ ~~lf' G' . /Or`5'~i~lo/ ~/ i? Improvements: ~-°~-~ • ..., Personal Pro a ,: ..,. , .. • P dY- _ , It any organization other than the'owner uses the property, .give. the'ri me~ol the .organization,. tuft particulars regarding its use of the ` property and the amount of any income received for such use. -- l'~/L° Give your estt fate of he true value In money of the property . ~ ~ , ~, Land: _Z~5 ~! !,~® ~ • Improvements: / Personal Property: Upon what uses or purposes do you base this claim for exemption? ~ Charitable ( ); Religious (x ); Educational ( ); Literary (: ); Scientific ( j~ Other ~: ; wive the specttic statutory authority upon which this property is claimed as exempt: _U '~ ` wi`7 ''~7~ ~- i - , ~' ~ . _ ..._ ; (Full texts ojall exemption and classification ~slatutesrare available at the office ojlhe county Assessor.) ~ • ~~ ` :AFFIRMATION Under penalties prescribed by law, I hereby at((rm that to the best of rtiy knowledge and belief, the statements and information in this lication are true and correct, and are made (or the~purpose of exempting a property. rein scribed from taxati ~ •y 6~ ,, ' Signature o owner or authorized r res ive ~ 'ROVED ,.,CI.,YES / '///O/~GL° ~~1~~/1i //j/ G,~ ~~l~t~ one No. - ~( Q/J .~ Title Teleph ~ , ~. ~ - ,. _ 105-278.3 1'ftol~lat`rY suls.ll~:c;!r `r0 `rAxnrtoN fi 105-278.3 .. ', ~ wns in•evocnhl•y drdicuterl liu• use exclu- ing it fui• the purpose of sale to others ns sively as a cen~etury under Lhe North buri(rl sites, and us such the L•uul did not Carolina Cemetery Act, and where Lhe fall under lire exemption of this section taxpayer was. not 1)olding undeveloped as tax-exempt property. In re Lee Mem- land for its own burial, ber)use Lhe un- ory Carrlens, Inc., 110 N.C. App. 591, 930 developed land was irrevoa)bly deli- S.I!].2d 951 (199:2), crated li)r use rxclusively as a cenu~tery, Citee( in In re Springmour, inc., 398 Lhe t:rxpaycr could only brave bcnn hold• N.C. Apji, 1, 9913 S.f:.'Ld 177 (1998). 1.05-278.3. heal and personal property used for religious purposes. (a) Buildings, Lhe Iand Lhey acl:ually occupy, gild additional adjacent land reason~ibly necessary for the convenient use of any such building shall be exempted from taxation if wholly owned by an agency listed in subsection (c), below, and it` (].) Wholly and exclusively used by its owner for religious purposes as defined in subsection (d)(1), b(aow; ol~ (2) Occupied gratuitously by one other thr<u) Lhe owner and wholly and exclusively use(1 by i:he occupant for religious, chiaritablc, ur nonprofit educational, literary, scientific; or cultural purl)oses. - (1)) Personal pi•opcrLy shall be exemlited iron) La•xation if wholly owned by an agency listed 111 SubSl?CLIOn (c), brluw, and if: (1) Wholly ;zncl uxclu.5ively use(l by;its awnc~r li)r religious- .. purposrs; or (2) Gratuitously nuulc rivailable to ono other than LI)c owner and wholly anc! exclusively used by Lhc possessor Cor reliL;iuus, (iharitable, or nonpc•oliL u(luc;(tion;.ll, literary, sci- entific, or• cultural purposes. . (c) llle [i)hlowin~; agencies, when tl)C othcl' re(lUll'Cnlenl:5 U1 L1115 section lu•c met, nul•y obtain exclnptiun der l.hcir propcrLius: (1) A cot)bregaLion, .parish, nlissiun, or similar local unit of• a church or religious body; or (2) A conli~rencc, association, presbytery, diocese, district, synod, or similar Ulllt colnp!'lsing local units of•<i church) or ' ~ religious body. (d) Within Lhe meaning ul• Lhis section: - (1) A religious 'purpose is one that pertains. to practicing, .Leaching, and setting 1•orth a rcligiou. fllthough worship is Lhe most conuuon relil;ious purp~)se, the tern) encunlpasses other ~acLivities LhaC demonstrate and 1'urtlier Lhc beliefs _ and objectives of a given church or religious body. Within Lhe meaning; of this section, Lhe ownership and mainLe> nonce of•a general or proii)otiunal ollicc or headquarters by an ciwner listed in subdivision (2) oI'subsection (c), above, is a religious purpose and Lhc ownership and maintenance of residences for clergy, rabbis, priests or nuns assigned to or . -, . • sci•ving a congl•egation, parisli, mission or similar local unit, or ,%1 conference, association, presbytery, diocese, dis- trice, synod, province or similar unit of;a church or religious body or residences Ior clergy on furlough oi• unassigned, is .. . also a religious purpose, I-Iowevu-•, Lhu ownership and • maintenance of residences !or other `elnp o--T yc~.es `is r reliL;iotls purpose nr el rer a uca u i ' ~ oi• a s i.~ , )oc y or . ~ l 1'CIICC i1SS0clt1 '101"1, t t... cliuc~ty (lis_- • r_`--~ynuc, r suni ar untt o a ' or t ~~~~ .rY ~.: .,` ~~., }4 .7}. ~~~r. r'..~ -. a .T : :. .~1,.,tN t~~~~~~ L~yi~`~ Y•1i ,~rCf, (a: ,,,,~ .r ,' ~ . .; ' I ~ .Y , ,,~ ,, ,," ':.. ; -: '4' . .. tt~ ~ ~. ~ . • ;1{. ' '` '.' ~ ~`~ ! .. ~:,•, [ '~: ~ ' ,# I ~ „ ~~ t ' x . . ; q' . f- • • ,ti ~ , ~! . } .. ~ , "• . ~;' . tl_,;. ~h, ~~ ~ : ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~'±, - ~~ 1 ~'r I' , r ~~~ ; . 4 ;, . . It ~ • , .~ ! '~~ . . , 65 ,•:~1 ,~ ,, ~` ~~ ii(! .' ~ ~ •) ~~ ~,'; 1~:~ r I ~h~ ;,~ 6 fi 105-278.3 MAi;I1INl.RY AC.°r ~ 105-278.3 religious body. 1'ruvided, huwevel•, ChaC where part of prop- erty which otherwise dualities for the exetlipliotl provided herein is made available as Fl residence for an individual . W110 pl'OV1dCS f~TUFII'dlall, jruliCorial and custodinl,services I•or . such property, oi• who uvers(:es and silpervises qualifying activities upon Anil in.coi~nection wil:h said property, the C[1t11'e property shall be considered as wholly and exclu- sively use(] 1'or a religious purpose. (2) A charitable purpose is oni; t11:1C has Humane an(1 philun- . Ulropic objectives; it is an activity that benefits humanity or a significant rather than limited segment oi'the community without expectation of pecuniary pro(il: or reward. '1'he humane treatmei)t of animals is also a charitable purpose. (3) An educational liurpose is one that leas as its objective the education or instruction of hulilan beings; it cumprehelxls the transmission of in(•ormatioli and the training or (level- oprnent of the knowledge or skills ol• individual persons. • (9) A literary purpose is one that pertains Co letters or lltera- ture (inclu(linl; drama), especially writing, publishing, tlnd the study uCliternture. (5) n cultural purpose is one that is conducive to the enlight- ' enmenC and relinenleilt of taste ~lcquire(1 through iliCellec- tual and aesthetic Graining, education, an(1 disc)pline. (G) A scientific purpose is one that yields knowledge systemat- ' ically through research, experimentlltion or other work (lone 111 OAL' Ol' m61'e of the nF1t111'al SC1CnL'L'S. ' ' (e) Notwithstanc.ling the exclusive-use requiremelit of subsection (a), above, if part of a property Chat otherwise meets' that subset- ' lion's requirements is used for a purpi)sc that woul(l require exe,np= lion if the entire property were so use(I, Llre valuaCion ol• the part so used shall be exempted li•oln Caxation. (() The fact that a building or facility is iliciclentally available to. and patronized by the general public, so long as there is no material amount of business or patl•onage with the general. public, shall not defeat the exemption granted by this section. (g) Notwithstanding the exclusive-use requirement oCsubsection (a), above, any ptu•lcing lot wholly owne(1 by an agency listed in subsection (c), above, may be used for pFU•hinb without removinf; the tax exemption 1;•rtante(1 in this section; provided, the toCal chtlrge Ihi•. said ilses sh•111 not exceed that portion of tl)e act.uill nulilitenance. . oxpcnditures li)r tl')c 1);u•Icin(; IoL reasonill)ly e.~stinulted Lo'lulve been ~ , nuulc on account ol•saicl use:i.'1'hiy sul)5i!ction shall al)i>ly het;iniiin~• ' with t11C tt)xable yeFlr thilt colnlnences un .Jtuuurry 'l, L)78. (197:3, 'c,: G95, s. 9; c. 1.921; :1975, c. 8'18; 197 7, c, 8(i7.) . Lugul 1'criudiculs. - T'or sympu- - lour lu•licle wl lilnil-order lilinislries slant on hialoric presurvnlion WIIICI( 111- 111111L•1' IIU: yl'C(1011 170 chul'itnhle conlri- . eludes n discussion ul' relevant Norll) .:. buliun elcllucliun, sec `] l CuinpGcll l:. `'''' Cnrulinlt Llw, see ]2 Wnku I~m•usl L. lieu. , Jiev. 1 (19A8). ~ ,, ' 9 (197G). . . CASI: NU't7~~5 ~ , 1'rnpcrly Musl lSc I'rusuully Used ~ it is nut. lux cxlunpl; l.x:causc nu public . '', ' for I?xiempl Purpi)scs. - `l'hc rule in j)urposc is served by permitting land U) Nm'lIl [.:711'OI11111 19 llnll lIIIIL'99 prUflCl'ly IS '~ Ill! IIIIU:iell alld UIIIU %Cll~ pl'C9elll IIBL'~ llel '~ presrnlly used !i)r lax excnlpl purpose; ~:`inlended use, calllruls. LI re Worley, 93 .' (i.0 ~ , . ti ~.a n,~A dir. 6i; , _ ;: ~,! § 10~ N.C. lt( yout):~, non f~ tivitiet and fo 9:] N.C Pro lure which poses lion of also t Worle• (1989) Nut uaus from purpo App. 1'rc Uso o! cone t expos seclio 97? S Usc ~uffe) x' ~/ ~~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 8.2 Estimated Time: Page.Number:. .. . Department: TAX Presenter: Robert C. Glasgow Contact: Robert C;. Glasgow SUBJECT: Appeal of Exemption Denial for 1996 BMW - St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church BRIEF SUMMARY: ~ - The Tax Department disapproved the March 21, 2000 request for tax exemption for a vehicle ,registered to St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. The church has appealed that denied .exemption.. On April 18, after receipt of the AV-10 (application for exemption) the Tax Administrator went to the church and spoke with Rev. Alexoudis to validate that the vehicle would be used for religious and not personal uses. Rev. Alexoudis indicated that he had another vehicle, a 1990 Lincoln Town Card, he used for personal business. When verification of a second vehicle was made; a second vehicle could not be found in the name of Alexoudis. On May 10, a telephone call was made to Rev. Alexoudis to inquire about the vehicle he had indicated he used for personal business. When asked how it was registered he replied it was registered to the Pittsburgh Diocese. At that time, the Tax Administrator informed Rev. Alexoudis the exemption would not be approved based on this information. Approximately 10 minutes later, Rev. Alexoudis called the Tax Department to clarify what he had previously said, indicating that he had mis-spoken and the 1990 Lincoln Town Car was in his name as the registered owner and not the Pittsburgh Diocese. When asked how long this vehicle had been.in North Carolina, Rev. Alexoudis replied since November 1999. The 1990 Lincoln Town Car was not license in North Ca"rolina'until June 16„ 2000, nearly 3 months after the initial conversation and eight months after the vehicle was reported to have arrived in North Carolina. NCGS make provisions for' a reciprocity agreeme`ritywith other states for the registration of vehicles in the new state when the~.registration expires'~i'ri`~the former state. The fact that Rev. Alexoudis was in possession of the 1990 Lincoln Towh Car arid?it was to be used in North Carolina by him, the vehicle ownership should ;have been transferred immediately. . 4 -. Appellant's argument: Rev. Alexoudis does not believe ~fliaf.his actions should deprive the church of having an exempt vehicle. He further indicates that he has not seen anything in the General Statutes that requires a personal vehicle to be registered in the state of North Carolina. He .further asked if Wesley United Methodist Church has been questioned as to their personal vehicles grid in what state they might be registered when applying for exemptions on their vans. Further he wonders if the scrutiny is because it is the Greek Orthodox Church or because it is a BMW and ' not a van: 'He concludes by stating "I do not see why the church should be penalized by denying the tax exempt status for a church owned vehicle for church business." Tax Department's Argument.: In March, Rev. Alexoudis stated that he owned a 1990 Lincoln Town car which was used for personal business. The X1990 Lincoln Town Car was in fact owned by the Pittsburgh Diocese, which makes it an exempt automobile in the state of Pennsylvania. Rev. Alexoudis changed owners and registered the 1990 Lincoln Town Car in North Carolina on June 16, 2000. GS 105.278.3 requires exempt real and personal property be used "wholly and exclusively for religious purposes." The fact that Rev. Alexoudis was using the 1990 Lincoln Town Car, which was registered in the state of Pennsylvania and in the name of the Pittsburgh Diocese, appears to be an attempt to avoid taxation in the state of North Carolina. Rev. Alexoudis knew 67 that it was necessary to receive a North Carolina .driver's license, receiving one in November 1999, the same month he indicated the Lincoln Town car arrived in North Carolina. North Carolina has a reciprocity agreement with other states that allow owners of vehicles licensed in another state to license their vehicles when the license plate expires in the former state it was licensed in. In this I i i case, Rev. Alexoudis should have become the owners of the vehicle when he left Pennsylvania in November, but waited until the Tax Department denied th e request for exemption for the vehicle owned by St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. Rev. Alexoudis does represent St Nicholas Green . Orthodox Church and his actions should be accountable. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS ~_ .-! It is recommended the Commissioners. uphold the denied exemption request for the 1996 BMW for tax year 2000. It is further recommended that an application for exemption be filed by St . Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church for fax year 2001. That application for exemption will be approved if there continues to be a privately owned vehicle available for non-religious activities. the denial of tax exemption for tax year 2000 is based i l on m s- eading statements and the i personally owned vehicle identified being used for non-religious purposes was in fact in the name of the Pittsburgh Diocese and not licensed in the state of North Carolina until June 2000. FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENT ND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend upholding denia ~ . COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS• ~ ~ - _. ~ , .. ., ~° APPROVED ®' ;~~ . " REJECTED. .E~-'-'~ `- ~ . ~ . , r ~ . REMOVED:. ® , j~ ~,~ ,. , POSTPONED fJ ~ ~ ~ .: _ ~ ~ .;;: x , . :~ ~ ~ , .. __ ,. , .. . ,. . _,.. . A .., . , -. , ; .. . ,: .. ... , ,. ~ ~ .. ,t, ,. _ .. .. , ,. ~ . , . - , ., • -a t R " ~ ~ ~. . " .., _ , , _ :. ~r.... _ - ~~ . . • GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA SAINT NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH 608 South College Road • Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 910-392-4484 Fax 910-392-4498 Rev. Father Regis John Alexoudis, Priest May 23, 2000 Mr. Robert C. Glasgow Tax Administrator =New Hanover County 320 Chestnut Street, Room 209 Wilmington, NC 2840,1-4090 Re: Request for Exemption - 1996 BMWiI (NC MWB 443p) Dear Mr. Glasgow: We received your denial of our request for exemption: We wish to appeal your decision. In your response you recount the facts that support your decision, but fail to recall those that would allow our church the right to have atax-exempt church vehicle, which were also stated to you on the phone. • • The fact is that the vehicle is only for church business and use. You asked if I had another vehicle for personal use. I explained to you I did. I do riot see any place in the statutes that says, "a personal vehicle must be registered in the state of I`!orth Carolina". You never asked us, who else might be driving this vehicle for church business. When V1Jesley Memorial United Methodist Church, which has several tax exempt vans in their church's name, and other churches apply for exemptions, who is questioned, as to their personal vehicles and in what state they might be registered? - Is your scrutiny because it is .the Greek Orthodox Church requesting the exemption or because it is a BMW and not a van? If I am to be penalized for not registering my personal vehicle in North Carolina, so be it. Never the less, I do not see why the church should be penalized by denying the tax exempt status for a church owned vehicle for church business. Thank you for you attention in this matter. Sincerely ~ , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . `~ ~, ,~ Rev. R. I xoudis ~ ~~~ .:~ 1:,~ 69 .. 4 r'!~ n~ti RJA/km f 1 f hfSY C _ ~j ~~ s .l_ :~,.~ .YEAR ~ ~ ' ~~~ L ~~ - APPLICATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE EXEMPTION County 1..~ ~ ~ Vl ~."~ ~.-l/' City or Town V " l ~ ~M ~~ ~ `~ Under the provisions o(G. S. 105-330.3 every owner of property claiming exemption or exclusion lrorn property , taxes must demonstrate that the propertymeets the statuatory requirements for.exemption or classification. Claims for exemption or exclusion of personal property must be filed with the assessor of the county in which property. is located. ~ o~ S . C~ I ~~._ ~~~• t ~ 1 ~ Vln`t. v~ ~~ ,^ ~~ Name o(Owner ~ ~ Cw t ~ ~ ~~ rQ Q,. ~Y"~ l/~,U C~ 0 . Address ~ ~~ • ~~~~ ~ l ' ` ~ zq z- Give complete description of property: Tag # ~ ~ ~~ `~~' 3 ? Date of Purchase ~ ~~ ~ .p . Q Make y~ ~ Vl9 ~ 1-~~ t ~ Year . vin-# W ~A~ Cr'~I` 8 3 2 0 T'~~ 3~ z so ,~ _ ~ _ . Upon what use or purpose do ,you base this claim for exemption? Charitable f j ~ Religious (~ , Educational [ j ' Other ~ - ~ • •.. - .- Full texts o(all exemption and classl(Icatlon statutes are available at the ot(Ice of the fount ta; ~ ssesor. ~. ~.-~ -i.r ~ n .. , err. ~ - . ~' ~s • • . - `t'h ` A~'I~ili~F4: SIF~dPi.lrq . c • ~ AFFIRMATION ~ ~ f~~ ~.. ~ ~' +~/~ C3~ . ` Under penalties prescribed by law, 1 hereby allirm That to the best of m kno ~~~ ~~~~ y wledge and bellel, the statements ' ~'` and lnlorma!ion on this appficatiarz are ;rue and correct, and are made for the purpose of exempting (he property ~~ herein described from taxation. ' ~• ~ , Si tur ow o lh representative "'° ~.. ' ,.. w . Title , „ - ,Telephone No. -APt~~ED: YES N ~~ ,,. ' 4.. ,- iNEW HANOVER COUNTY TAX OFFICE 19g~ VIsIrIIC1.E TAY NOTICE PO BOX 9003 WILMINGTON NC 28402-9003 ~ FAILURE TO PAY will restdt in DMY'S refusal to allow renewal ul'the ~ registration. Unpaid balances accrue interest at the rate of 3/4 f J9 e ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED o o per month and the owner(s) are subject to collection action including garttshn,entandsei2ureofpersona,prupeny. DUE TO NEW BANKING PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED gY TTiE COUNTY, YOUR PAYMENT SHOULD BE MA~Ep TO THE CHARLOTTE VEHICLE VALUE -All licensed vehicles are valued annually as of January I preceding the registration. Value a pe als must be submitted in ADDRESS. THIS NEVd PROCESS grill, BETTER SERVE YOU AND BE MORE COST E yy days ogf thetbill'ng date on thisnnotice~~Appealtdeedline is not extetnd i d FFECTIVE POR THE COUNTY. PAYMENTS MAY BE ec ue [o weekends, holidays, or pustntarks. • MADE W PERSON A'T OUR OFFICE AT 720 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 10l WR.MVJOTON NC. TAXING DISTRICT is detcmtined by the residence location of th ' ' _ e vehicle s owner on the date that the registrauon was applied for or renewed, SALE OR TRANSFER OF VEHICLE - If vehicle ownership is transferred and plates are surrendered to DMV, the tax may be prorated. Proof of sale and plate surrender must be rovided t f p o our o fice wit)un 120 days of the plate surrender date ~tt~t~~n~tt~u~~~trn~~n~ut~u~t~~t~ttu~t~~t~utt~r~~t~tr~ "'""` . PLATE TRANSFER-If youhnvetransferredthevehicleplateasshow AUTO"3-DIGIT 284 81 59 T28:167 n on this nonce to another vehicle; this notice is correct and must be paid iri full ST' NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHU , PO BOX 7292 VEHICLE OWNER MOVED OUT OF STATE -Tax bill ma be prorated if owner establishes residency Su t of stnte i WILMINGTON N C 28406-7292 sters the vehicle in , reVg p m ihbe pr vd d dot ur olti a w r 2 D h ~ s i e o o i ihin 1 0 days of t1t e platesurrender datewe . MILITARY -Subject to tax unless proof is provided that NC wns not your home ofrecord on the date regisvatiun was appbed 1'ur or renewed. • RE'T'URN CHECK FEE - 525.00 plus ]0% of check amount will be charged for checks returned unpaid becaus f i f i e o nsu f cient Funds. Tax receipts are null and vnidif oayment is made with a check that is returned by the bank. ^dH COUNTY .5850 233.01 WILMINGTON .4700 194.25 03/01/00 0_846784 9909 P990908244 WILM LICENSE ^XLAI2 11IAYS'L* ;1ICENSN' NUM1lI1)wR :: 5.00 VEHICLE INFORMATION DUE TOTAL J8320TDL36250 41330 DATE 03/31J00 D(JE 432.76 INFORMATION Office Location: 320 Chestnut Street, Room lOl, Wilmington , NC ~ For payment arrangements, call: 910-341-7112 Collections Office Hours: 7:30 AM - 5:00 PM, Monday -Friday For all other inquiries, call: 910-341-7136 Listirig` IMPORTANT: TO EXPEDITE HANDLING, ALL CORRESPONDENCE SHOULD BE MAILED TO OUR LOCAL ADDRESS: PO IIOX 9003, WILMINGTON, NC 28402-9003. DETACH AND RE'rA1N THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS - - - LEASERETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT BILLING llATh YEAR ACCOUNT NUMBER ' `DUE DATE 03/01/00 1999 0846784-9909 03/31/00 TO CHANGE YOUR MAILING ADDRESS, PLEASE FILL ~ - ToTni uvE .: IN YOUR NEW ADDRESS.BELOW. II II I NAME: ~ IIlIIIIIIIIIIIIII~~IIIIIII~IIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIII~III~IIIIiIIIII~I ~, 4 3 2. 7 6 ADDRESS:. CITY: STATE:.. ZIP: MAKE cxECx PAYABLE & REIvI1T Ta ~ - ST NICHOLAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHU PO BOX 7292 NEW HANOVER COUN~'Y TAX OFFICE -~• WILMINGTON NC 28406-7292 PO BOX 580351 CHARLOTTE NC 28258-0351 ~u~Y~~u~r)t~t~r~t~r~u~t~~tutt~~u~t~uti~~r~t~utt~~~~ut~ .08467849.9100000432763 ~ ~ ' l~W ~i.~1iT~VEIa CO ° ROBERT C. GLASGOW Tax Administrator May 10, 2000 1F11i HllM1N15'1'IZAI'ION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 . . ~ TELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 FAX (91 D) 341-4495 " . Reverend Regis ). Alexoudis - St. Nicholas Green Orthodox Church ~ ' P.O. Box 7292 Wilmington, NC 28406=7292 Re: Request for Exemption - 1996 BMWi (NC MWB 4430) Dear Reverend Alexoudis: ' . During our conversation at the church April 18, 2000, you indicated that a second car was used for personal business and the BMW was .used for church related business only.This . is important. since North Carolina General Statutes require. any exernpt property to~be used , wholly and exclusively for official business, not personal use. I was unable to find any record of ownership of~another car in your name. ~ Based on.that I was prepared to deny the request for exemption: Your call to the Tax Department on May ~ " 9, allowed me to ask if you owned another car.and if so how was it registered? The •initial response received. was that you had a 1990. Lincoln Town Car w_ hich was registered. in the ~. name of the Pittsburgh Diocese and used for- personal business. At that time I informed you the BMW would not be considered exempt; since you do not have a personally owned vehicle registered in North Carolina for personal business. The Lincoln Town Car would. ,, :.~ not be considered personal since it was owned by the Pittsburgh ,Diocese and.was `.~ _. registered in Pennsylvania. At this time I indicated to you that I would be denying the exemption for the BMW. ..- - ., Approximately ten minutes later you called back to fell me that the 90 Lincoln Town Car _ was registered in your name not the Pittsburgh Diocese. I asked how long it had been in '- North Carolina? You indicated since November 1999. You were :informed that North Carolina requires all vehicles that are in the state for 30 consecutive days must be registered. in North Carolina.. ~ ~ : ~ ~ " " ~ '' ~~ ~' . ,. • : . ' .. . You asked about out of-state (college) students not being required to register vehrcles. ~ _ ' These students are 'riot required to register.a vehicle unless they are owners"of real estate or ~ . permanent residents of North Carolina. You also asked about Clergy being exempt from ~~ ~ , . registering vehicles. The only vehicles which are exempt-for clergy are those which`are _ _ ' ;registered in the name of the exempt organization: A copy of the general statute is - • provided. ".• s . ~ - 72 ~ ~ ~:. ,. The request_for exemption for the 1996 BMWi North Carolina license number MWB 4430 is not approved. The exemption is not approved because there is no personally owned vehicle registered in your name in North Carolina. '. You are required,~by North Caroling General Statutes to register any vehicle which is in the .estate of North Carolina for 30 days. You have the right to appeal this decision within 30 days from the date of this letter to the Board of County Commissioners. Should you wish to appeal a date and time will be set for you to explain to the Board why the vehicle should be exempt for tax year 2000. Sincerely;- Robert C. Glasgow Tax Administrator enclosure cc: H. Moore, Legal ('. ). Raynor, Collector of Revenue F. Gaskin, Listings •` - '~~ 73 STATUS CURRENT TITLE, NOT HELD ~ ~ ~J•vV-JV TITLE. "770709001689059 1990 LINC TOWN CAR SIG 4S OD ~-~-1LNLM82F3LY629139 DEALER FUEL G ACT`D,T 061600 TITLE DT 061600 TRF DT .061600 APPL DT 061600 PRNT DT 062300Y OWNER ID 000008530462 OWNERS 1 LIENS: 0 EQUIP TAX CNTY NEW H N REGIS JOHN ALEXOUDIS 3842 ASTER CT WILMINGTON NC 284092561 LESSEE ID ~ LESSEES CONTROL PLATE NO NPM1517 25173406 ISS DT 061600 EXP FHVUT DT CAT PRIVATE AUTO S28 - STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE P# 4088101833 STATUS ACTIVE 06/16/2000 CER' PF1/HELP PF2/IMAGE PF3/RETURN PF4/ PF7/HOLD CD PF8/ PF9/PRINT PF10/DRAFTS ~4 DT 063001 WEIGHT USE PASS DRAFT N P DT 061600 CERT TYPE FR2 PF5/LESSEES PF6/OWNERS PF11/ PF12/MENU ~wv H~vovER co TAX ADMINISTRATION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 FAX (910) 341-4495 ROBERT C. GLASGOW Tax Administrator ' October 26, 2000 Reverend R. J. Alexoudis 608 South College Road :Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Appeal of Property Tax Exemption - 1996 BMWi (NC MWB 4430) Dear Reverend Alexoudis: Your appeal of the denied property tax exemption for the 1996 BMWi has been scheduled to be heard by the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners on Monday, November 13 during the evening session. The appeal will be heard in the Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse, 24 North Third Street; Room 301, Wilmington, NC: When a . definite time has been established, you will be notified.. .You will have the opportunity to present evidence to the. Board of County Commissioners to show why the exemption for the referenced vehicle should be approved. The burden of proof _ is on the taxpayer to provide evidence that the 1990 Lincoln Town car, which was identified as • used for personal business, was registered and licensed in. the state of North Carolina on January 1,2000. North Carolina General Statutes provide for the exemption of vehicles .which are used wholly and exclusively for the exempt purpose and not for personal use. This requires a second vehicle to be available for personal use. Based on the information provided, it does not appear that the second vehicle identified, was registered and licensed in North Carolina based on the conflicting information which was provided. . Should you have any documentation which you would like to present to the Board, it should _ be provided to this office by Tuesday, October 31;2000. Documentation which has not been provided by that date will probably not be entertained by.the Board. S' cerely, Robert C. Glas ow Tax Administrator cc: Mr. Holt Moore, Legal Ms. P.). Raynor, Collector of Revenue .. .. - . r 75 u.. 76 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS .REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 8.3 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: TAX. Presenter: Robert Glasgow Contact: Robert Glasgow SUBJECT: Appeal of 1999 Vehicle Value - 1998 Ford Ranger -Christopher Taylor BRIEF SUMMARY: The Tax Department assessed Mr. Taylor's 1998 Ford Truck with a taxable value of $14,070 for tax year 1998: Mr. Taylor appealed the tax value providing proof of purchase to be $11,536.79 which included $393.79 in license fee, license transfer fee, title, registration fees, and local and state sales taxes. The Tax Department made a one time reduction in the tax value of the truck to $11,143, which is the purchase price paid by Mr: Taylor. For 1999; the value of this truck was determined to be $12,010 based on data provided by Tax Equity Consultants, which is the valuation• service used by most North Carolina Tax Departments and North Carolina DMV for vehicle valuation. Mr. Taylor believes the value of truck should be depreciated from the original purchase price, thus having a tax value of $7,780 for 2000. APPELLANT'S ARGUMENT: Mr. Taylor provided the sales receipt for the purchase of his vehicle when he appealed his 1998 tax value. The purchase price, less tax and tags was $11,143. There was a $1,000 rebate provided. Mr. Taylor's request for a reduction in the assessed value based on his purchase price was made by the Tax Department reducing the taxable value to $11.,143. In tax year 1999, the assessed value was identified to be $12,010 which Mr. Taylor has appealed • indicating the taxable value for 1998 should not have been $11,143, which included the $1,000 rebate he received from the dealership. Mr. Taylor believes the taxable value should have been $10,143 and the depreciated value as of September 5, 1999, would make it worth $8,794. The . depreciated value for 2000 should be approximately $7,780 for September 5, 2000. Mr, Taylor has requested that a refund be provided for 1998 and 1999. TAX DEPARTMENT'S ARGUMENT: Mr. Taylor was provided a one time adjustment based on the purchase price of $11,143. An administrative decision was made several years ago to allow a one-time adjustment in the year of purchase only, based on the purchase price of the vehicle,-and the' following year the value would then be assessed from TEC, our motor vehicle pricing guide. Mr. Taylor was advised .of this decision when the assessed value was reduced. It is not uncommon for a one time reduction to be made the first year for new vehicles. Companies which provide tax tables to taxing jurisdictions, must accumulate sales data over a period of time in order to provide accurate market value to base tax values. Please note on the sales contract the item identified as''cash price of vehicle & accessories" which is $11,143. NCGS 105.387.3 (Rate • of Tax) identifies a 3 /o tax on the cash price of the vehicle which. was $334.29. The vafue.for the 1998 Ford Ranger as of January 1, 1999 was idehtified to be $12,010 which is ' the value assigned to the vehicle based on accumulated data provided by the subscriber tax service, Tax Equity Consultants. Values are based on January 1 of the year in which they are • being taxed, not the date of purchase. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• ~DUI~iTY COMMty~ The Tax Department recommends the taxable value of Mr. Taylor's 199$FFo'rd~R`a~,nge~ remain at $11,143 for 1998 and $12,010 for 1999. REJECTED Q ~{ v;. FUNDING SOURCE: - REMOVED (~ . ~"', 77 POSTPONED L~ ~6EAR15 ~ . ATTACHMENTS:. ~ ~.a~. Il_.,I~~,®a'~ ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMEND NS: Recommend upholding Tax Department's position. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: C ~ ~4~~(9~u'~L YiWy`C~'/wt~/ ` 'I ~~'' S .. I n t . ~ i .~e~w CYi Va&aF til ~~~'y~~«'3f.~.~{1}y. ' ~ ;l '~ ~4Y~~A t'.z 4209 Province Drive, North Chase - n Wilmington NC 28405 Friday, October 2l, 2000 ' Robert C. Glasgow, Tax Administrator ` ~ ,NEW HANOVER COUNTY 'r" : s~':,'~"° ,;,, Tax Department, `Listing ,~ ~~ ~ 320 Chestnut St., RM 101 ~ ~~~' ~~` Wilmington lr, f ~~I;7~ z~~~ ,j NC 28401 :~~ 5,.... iD(1~61N ~~.~, ~F~"1C f ~~~~. Dear Mr. Glasgow: ~- ~ _ ~~~'~~ ~'\.~~ ~~ ,,; c ~. ~:~ r ~,t RE: VALUE APPEAL P990710121 `~~=..s~,.%..~_~.,~'"'`w This letter is in reply to yours of Octoberl9 (date changed by hand from October 16), 200.0. Your letter incorrectly states the purchase price of the Ford Ranger. The actual price paid was $10,143 after the $1,000 rebate applied at time of purchase. This was the tn~e value of the vehicle. Dealers do not normally sell vehicles to the public for less than the true ' value and there was nothing abnormal about this sale. Similar deals were available to any member of the public. No doubt other such deals were actually transacted. I have earlier produced evidence that Cape Fear Ford advertised similar deals in May and December of 1998, Now enclosed and .referenced below, is further evidence showing that similar deals . remain on offer to the public two years after the :Ranger was purchased. Such advertising would be illegal if false and my experience. shows that it was not false. True value is not found in MRSP's, nor.is it found in hypothetical valuations used by the Tax Administration but, for new vehicles at least, it is found in the actual money that changes hands in payment for the property transferred. The documents 1 would like to present to the Board consist of AT1'ACHMEN"hS as follow: l . My letter of September 4, 2000 with_ all of its.attachments. A further set of copies is now enclosed. 2. Two more advertisements from the Star, on September 24 and 29, 2000, showing almost identical vehicles still available for $10,490. With inflation at ~2%.p.a., this equates to $10,000 at the time the Ranger was purchased in -September of 1998. 3. For comparison; the $23,812.90, Purchase Order for a Chevrolet Impala and the related 1999 Vehicle Tax Notice based on a valuation of $17,610. These show that the Tax Administration valued the Impala, on January l , 2000 ~ 74% of the October 22, 1999 purchase price. Comparatively, even my estimate for the • Ranger was high, ~ 87% on January 1, ] 999 of the September O5, 1999 ~~ - nhtax0ok Page 1 oft 10/21/00 4:32 PM 79 V 1 O _ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ O 1 ` ~ • ~ O • ~ ~ • V N :, ~ cu is a 10 • '~` ~ 1 ~ V ~ `~ ~ Vim. 1 ~ ti ~; w ~ t~ O L ~` ~' N o ~ LL 2 ~~ N fly ~.,~ ~k a= N i \./ \ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t 11 ~ O .., ~ ~ 't ~~ y0'O ~ ~~ U t~ ~ 1 0 ~..T~ ~ O 'r ~~ m~ •• V l i° z ~} . ~ ~ ~~ O :,:- 1,1, ~ ~o • 'i9'~ ~ ~ .~ • ~ ,. , ~~_..~., ~_.~'$-~ '.~ ty 'urchaser's Name >pouse's ~ 1121 J College t+td:' ".::~:.~ ' Wilmington, NC 28403 ;; 910-791-2424 1~~~ 1-800-775-6099 i_.F'-r Fax (9100 350-1404 . . CHRISTOPHER~TAYLOR 4209 PROVINCE ARIVE street IJILMINQTQN MC ' :ity State NEW HAN . dip '~ ~ County . -- ' 'hone # H -~"~ ~, (910>, 7 ? 41 J ~~' Date: uL i Ut3k.tt i~t:nd, 1 `J99 Retail Purchase Order xx New .Used Program Car Truck Year 20~ Make CHEVROLET Model I~ALA Type IMAALA Color Miles 21 Stock # Y7354 ~.A1T 4Spd SSpd 4Cyl 6Cyl xX 8Cyl '~ ~it ~S~~0Y91 s6 t09 ... ~ , ..,., t , i , ~ ~., ~,. . GM CARD REBATE # ' ~ V ~ `' ~`~l. -~ ~~ 1. i% ~^. n 1~i° ' V ,.. N/A N/A ' Rebate Amount # Grade-In11~~ription: CHEVROLET tear Make vlode~ ~ ' `Type ~olor ~ Miles ~ • /in # G3~01&09 warrant'that my, trade-in has NOT been reconstructed, rebuilt, or suffered najor frame damage that cased the reconstructing of this. vehicle. warrant that the balance awed on my trade-in is correct. as stated on,this Buyer's order and that if the actual amount is greater, 1 will reimburse eff Gordon Chevrolet. 1 understand that if the amount is less Jeff Gordon ~hevrolet will refund, the difference. ' signature ' .. - .. ,.., _ Sale Tax 5g~, Tag ~ Tale :. ' Processing a Documentation Fee 169.00 DRNIEL .R PIN1`R # 2Q733 ~^d .J t. Tots! Cash Pnc4 . ~ ~1 . gt I r n Inf m ion nsu ce a or at N/A N/A ~ 2. Cash Deposit --• ~ deductible Co Coll Down - ~~ T . E . Peym®nt Cash on (Jet 1331 . 16 ns Co: 613~K' 67909 , ~ • ° " . ~ 9T- z~r 'olicy # Phone # ~ .. r 3. TrsW•In " 4S . 08 .. (~. ~ff Dates: from / / to ~ / / Uss Payott , -~ ~ Payoff Verification ,. -Total Down Payment (2~3)' x..238! . 91 . :,ien holder S. Unpaid Balenoo of Cash~Price (t-4) ~ II f . Street ~ .6..Ottt~r /I ,Sity ~ State. 7 Unpaid 8d • Aml to be Finanoad (5+8) /1 ~ l ~ . . Zip Phone # Th f e in ormation you see on the window form for this part of this contract. 1• Account # Date ` Information on the window form overrides any contrary provisions in the contract to day payofT Good tiu / i of sale. ... ~ Quoted By DUE BILL - ~ • Disclaimer ~ ~ Work b time of sale. ~~~ `~_ 1 Thi i ' s new or used motor vehicle s purchased by the undersigned without any ~ expressed warranty what so ever from Jeff Gordon Chevrolet except as may be 2• ~ hdt~R VE! I~~L-~ \\ ^ ^ V stated here in afterin writing. The manufacturer gives limited warranty on al! 3, new ve ~ le r the benefit of the purchaser. This warranty is made by the manuf ref~~fnd not JeffGotdon Chevrolet., Above work to be performed free of charge. If performed within 30 days. Any additional work will be aggxtre charge ; ~~ // All im~TNarranties, including warranties of merchant-ability and . Signed : . >: -~ ~ • ~" - ~ ~--T•~ : . Purchaser ~~ fitness for particular purpose, and otherwise, are.excluded and dis- ulations we cannot loan cars claim d nce re Due to insur : _ : . e g a Signed Purchaser Order not valid unYess accepted by Authorized management representative of Jeff ~ ,~,. ~~ ~ ~~ ' Gordon Chevrolet. ' -.. Signed ~ ~~ ~ / ; . {~ ~• ii;~ ~ oved by MGR . _.....w ` p..._r. .. ... • - r Ui ~ °~ C ._- - .. ~ ~ : E: ~ ' e ~ 'O o 3 .~ .'. ,c ~ ~ a, u ~ Q1 ~` a F^ "o : ~ Y: O lp. tD ~ m c '° v ...°..r2. °~ E ~ a'o ° 3 :.. dt. ~ r tD G ~.~ u c c 4.. d u u ° .0 ~ '.7 ' io"' ~,°_'~ o?! cs us ~>'Su ~E° ~f~+~ u 017 ~ `?~ ~'av 'o oAU a- '°voc 3,0 o.?N W Of0 ~ - a~ c .. .. _ V '^'a °i v o ., u~ 0.7 n ~`o a U s. .~Q ~ O O w ~a ~'S~ ~ u y v U o ~"" Q.S. N :.{7r ~ ~ 1 W ' u ;c o ~J a ~ C UC q '- a c~ ~ ~-. W I d . E.y .~°vo 'J~oQ ~N ~i~L pF ~oUo 0°3 a~£ ~;~ X00 ~ ~ ~~ ~. W A yUy ~ ~ F GJ W 'E U O~ 4° g in F., ~ O Q ~~ Q M c (G~j _ W 'auu ?oo. ~ ~ 'o a.u a v ~~ W °~ u O J ~~ s ~ aJy::o Ua ~ Av ra w SAO ,_`u_° :o C7 `^ O ~ ,~ ~ E., a~° , v a .~ u E-+ o ,~ a O° v v v ~iz77 r c2 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ 43 us Lao a~~ u ~ W o:a.o y, o U~~ ~:?~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~'~ ~,F U. 'S~o C7N OC ~ We U^~a ~~ y O:. I- ~ ~ v h~ Nra. ~~'K O;u ?: W,a+oo H. t7~a`, .n ~o17 y", `c;2;, (!J ~ O ..Cj Qva~ Wes'^qu ~v ~°o>. ~~a Wood ~E. ~j~R'°, ..'O m• O W G4 .. ECU 7 3vs F' V1b0.~ aow >o`.~E .c° P~~ii~~~ ~-~ ~.~ pa >.~ f- 4, ,:~ zw _.__ G o A ,a w w ~~ U~ W H ~ O ~ Q 1- I:T ~_ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ CC w ', x ~~W; O ~ ri _ W =~ '~ ~~ j o Z z ~~ V ~~IP~~ ~ ~ a r vWi. j n a~ O W p a h _ r cG. rnl ~. ~ ~ .o U U ~. ~ ~ _ ~ Q: X Mfj ~~~~~ T ~ ~` a~~ ~ w ...1 z ' ' ¢z U Z~ ~~Wo~ .UcnUz ~ n ~.: ;c a g ~ ~,; 'z: v, ~ O QN ~~ ~z `QU~~ ~ ';.V cp U o x Z~jI--(n a o o _+ ~~ Z ~ o p M W I a X rZ W z~ ~ ~ t- ~ o `= * O d - W z ; f! p~ m n ~ fS, , ~ O Z J~ F' ~ 99w _r QN G r VQ, W G, o v ~ ° ~ o ~ O .`U iD o o ;a, ~ w <~ ~ a x . N . ' (7 w -_ N O O 4209 Province Drive, North Chase Wilmington NC 28405 Friday, October 21, 2000 Robert C. Glasgow, Tax Administrator .. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Tax Department, Listing 320 Chestnut St., RM 101 Wilmington NC 28401 ' Dear Mr. Glasgow: RE: VALUE APPEAL P990710121 This letter is in reply to yours of Octoberl9 (date changed by hand from October 16), .2000. Your letter incorrectly states the purchase price of the Ford Ranger, The actual price paid was $10,143 after the $1,000 rebate applied at time'of purchase. This was the true value ' • of the vehicle. Dealers do not normally sell vehicles to the public for less than the true value and there was nothing abnormal abo~~t this sale. Similar deals were available to any . -member of the public. No doubt other such deals were actually transacted. I have earlier `produced evidence that Cape .Fear Ford addertised similar deals in .May grid December of .1998. Now enclosed and referenced below;. is further evidence showing that similar deals remain. on offer to the public two years after the Ranger was purchased. Such advertising would be illegal if false and my experience shows that it was not false. True value is not- found in MRSP's, nor is it found in hypothetical valuations used by the Tax Administration but, for new~vehicles at least, it is found in the.actual money that changes hands in payment for the property transferred. The documents I would like to present to the Board consist of ATTACI-IlVIENTS as '. ' follow: ~ , 1, My letter of September 4, 2000 with all of its attachments. A further set of copies is'riow enclosed. 2. Two inore advertisements from the Star, on September 24 and 29, 2000, - ~ showing almost identical vehicles still available for $10,490. With inflation ~t . . ^-2% pa.; this equates to $10,000 at the timethe Ranger was purchased in ~. ' September of 1998. ! ~ Q .. ~ .: , 3. For comparison; the $23,812.90, Purchase Order fora Chevrolet Impala arid'the . ~ related 1999 Vehicle Tax-Notice based on a valuation of $17,610. These show that the Tax'Administration valued the Impala, on January 1, 2000 @ 74% of the October 22, 1999 purchase price. Comparatively, even my estimate for the • ~ Ranger was high,. ~ 87%° on .January 1, 1999 of the September O5, 1999 ~' 84 nhtax0ok ~ ~ . ~ Page 1 of 2 10/21 /00 4:3 5 PM ~ . ti a ~~ J (~. .. ~J ~, U (~ . c~ purchase price. Clearly the Tax Administration's first estimate @ 139%was grossly in error. The revision to $11,143, @ 110% remained erroneous compared with 74% for the Impala. The 1999 valuation, in any case, reverts to the original grossly erroneous basis; by valuing the, 16 month old, Ranger at 118% of the original purchase price. 4. A copy of this letter. 5. A copy of your letter of October 19, 2000. 6. Yet another advertisement, from June 13, 1998,this time at $9,990.. Sincerely Christopher Taylor . Q ,. 85 'w nhtax0ok . Page 2 of 2 10/21/00 4:35 PNI ~E~v H~vovER ~o~~ ROBrRT C. GLASGOW Tax Adminis ator October 1~, 2000 TAX ADMINISTRATION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 , , WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 (~ FAX (910) 341-4495 \ / Mr. Christopher Taylor. 4209 Providence Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 Re: Appeal of Property Tax Value - (P990710121) Dear Mr. Taylor: Your appeal of the property tax value for the 1998 Ford Ranger Truck has been scheduled to be heard by the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners on Monday, November 13 during the evening session. The appeal will be heard in Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC. When a definite time has been established, you will be notified. When you identified the difference in the tax value and purchase price of your new truck, a one time reduction to the purchase price of $11,143 was made. This is appropriate under North Carolina General Statutes, since the market value for new vehicles has not been established and is not published until six months after the introduction of the new models. By ' law the tax value for vehicles is established as of January 1 of the tax year, not at the time of purchase of the vehicle, except when market value for a new vehicle has not been established. . Once the market value has been established after the first year, that value is assigned as a taxable value and is depreciated accordingly every year thereafter. - _ . ' The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to provide evidence that the tax value is inconsistent with otf~er similar vehicles or there has been a misapplication of law, according to North. Carolina General Statutes. Historically, such appeals have been denied by the Board, since the General Statutes are very specific on consistent and uniform application of procedures,.which _~ appears to have been done in this case. ~ " Should you have any documentation which you. would like to present to the Board, it should , be provided this office by Tuesday, October 31, 2000. Documentation which has not been '' ;.~,`;` provided by that date will probably not be entertained by the Board. Any questions you have, ~ ~` ~` . should be directed to the undersigned. ~ . 'ncerely; ~ `~' r ~~"-~ Robert C. Glasgow ~ ~ . ~ ;~ , Tax Administrator .. .~ . ,~ QQ cc: Mr. Holt Moore; Legal V~ ~ (- (- .. •~ ~ .~ ~ ~: ~ - - ' 1 I" 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,r 1 ' h ck ~ ~.; 4m"R'~-- r. t • - i , 1! 1 1 ~ A ,r..t,. ...~ '. •~~ .. ',dik' ~ ° ~:' ~FOr 2-Door ~~, t ~ ,~ I ,. . '' Y r 1 ~~ 8T574 y ' ,~ ~1. ~ ~ . ,. ; - - - ~~ ~ ~ - , ~ , . t , ~,, ~ , . uourn U 2~9-2812. ~~~-y NATIO INTEL NAL 4780 Jordan roll beck X1997. 19 FL bad ~S ti ca'~ s r~ t , 35,ppp.mi, Nice. 534.500. spend Dealer6y5-9288 395 4 ,a..:~ y-}` ~ . ~ , - 735 TOYOTA 1 Ton Box Truck„ 1889. Dual wheels aii , , automatic trans- mission. 858pp `Call 819-9595. -~ t ` 796 ~ i F - .I lanted AUTOS-TRU Wa Pey Cash ~ ~~ ,,, „ ~' ~ Jackson Motor I Co.;~~13-8711 :. • .. _.., rF r.yr,, ' ~ ~ CARS, Snicks and scrap metal. No applfancee. 2 J'e Ju k ~ _ ~~ i~ _ , n Cer gemoval 791- , MINI VAN WANTED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Wheelchalr a ceeaslbla. ` Ca11278-3435.. ALWAYS TOP DOLLAR PAID For uaetl Dare T S S: ~~ }r ~., '' '~ • ' w GARS ~ ; C p ~ . racks, a 4x4's. Lovitts Auto 452-4200. :~ OMPACT jC ~1~:, KUp$ CARS: THE CAR'COMPA Y well II ry . your car for You; ',9e w11l . - ~s~ t ~ ~ - 3.'. OR FORD RESAT E~ - got r nce..Calt }dr details, 799-q' ... - B Bt?Y . r 3 UP ~ ~' ~ ~ , - ~ Wllrtiln SUS D GARS n iVlssarl: 3821 TO ~ ~~~ ~~, rJ ~ . -43pp CASH loi Junk dens, tr,x.'Sca Tow, away treat cep BroJ~n'g, gadialar a Alr Service 783-388 ~ y ' r'` ~ U 1 ~ For Xl, R l~ - - \l\ . , 1 oT 75-9253. NATIONAL A W OM Pickup . ~ ~ , uto Aple~alew.•,Caeb In hand So purchase,your car. Look- - Inp for ctenn usetl c #8T59 u`rr „~`~' E ° -~ ~ _ a w . ars. 395.1512 ". i .;„ « ~ ' ,~ ' ``F. ~, lh=Y . _ - IN LIEU ~ SPECIAL FINANCING an INCLU ~ ~~, , ,: ~ ~ "y. E, - ,. rc A "~" ROBERT C. GLASGOW Tax Administrator October 16, 2000 ~w ~~NO~ co~~ TAX ADMINISTRATION 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM 209 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4090 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7131 FAX (910) 341-4495 j Mr. Christopher Taylor ~ ' 4209 Providence Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 , r Re: Appeal of Property Tax Value - (P990710121) , Dear Mr. Taylor. Your appeal of the ,property tax value for the 1998 Ford Ranger Truck has been scheduled to-be heard by the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners on Monday; November 13 during the evening session.'The appeal will be.heard in Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC. When a .. definite time has been .established, you will be notified.. •` . When you identified the difference in the tax value and purchase price of your new truck; a one time reduction to the purchase price of $.11,143 was: made. This is appropriate under . • North Carolina General Statutes, since the market value for new vehicles has not been established and is not ublished until six month-s after the introduction.of the new models. ~By , p law the tax value for vehicles is established as of )anuaryl of the tax year, not at the time of purchase of the vehicle, except when markef value for anew vehicle has not been established. Once the market value has been established'afte~ the~first year, that.value is~assigned as a' taxable value and is depreciated accordingly every year thereafter. '. ~ - . . ;~ , The burden of roof, is on the tax a er to rovide evidence that the tax value is inconsisten p p Y p. ~ t~' with other similar vehicles or there has been a misapplication.of law; according to North' ~ , Carolina General Statutes. Historically, such appeals have been •denied by `the Board, since the • General Statutes are very specific on consistent:.and uniform application of procedures, which ' ,. . „ ~ . ' .f , appears to have been done in this case. ,° , ~ ~ ' Should you have any documentation which you would .like to present to the Board, it should •. ' be provided this office by Tuesday, October 31; 2000. Documentation which has not been ~ ' `° provided by that date will probably not be~entertaned by the Board. Any questions you have, `' '' should be directed to the undersigned. .. .K ~- , Sincerely, ct • •~ , - ~. 'Robert C. Glas ow ~. Tax Administrator ,.. ' ~., , • ..Qcc: Mr. Holt Moore, Legat _ NEW I~ANO~ER C~~TNTY Tax Department, Listing 320 Chestnut St, RM 101 Wilmington, NC 28401 TELEPHONE 910/341-7136 1%AX 910/772-7818 Robert C Glasgow Tax Administrator September 26, 2000 Christopher Taylor 4209 Province Dr Wilmington, NC 28405 RE: APPEAL OF VALUE P990710121 Dear Mr Taylor: You have requested a meeting with the Board of County. Commissioners. I have forwarded your request to our Administration Department. When I am advised of the date you are to appear before the Board, I will contact you, with that information. The recommendation of the tax office to the Board will be to uphold the uniformly applied market value. ~Iarket value is established•January 1 of each year for various makes and models of vehicles. We are not required to make individual appraisals of each vehicle in the County each year; therefore we rely on the mass appraisal process. Though there maybe reasonable variations from market value, the courts have .upheld this. process when it is uniformly applied. - When. a new vehicle is introduced, a market value is not established for some time, For that reason, we honor a one time adjustment based upon the bill of sale. You were given that onetime adjustment on account P980710223: The market value had been established by Janaury 1 of the following year; . resulting iri the assessment applied to bill P990710121, and all other accounts in the County with the same vehicle.. You appealed the value based upon your purchase price. Review of the market value by comparing two unrelated sources showed no error in assessment, thus your appeal was.denied. I will reiterate, however, that if in the future you feel the velucle is in substandard condition or. there are excessively high miles on the vehicle, you may appeal within the appeal period -for those reasons. Again, though there is no error in assessment that would.allow'me to adjust the value on P990710121, you are being scheduled to appear before the Board of County Commissioners as requested. I will be in touch with you when I have been given a date for your appearance. Sincerely, Kristine Chandler tang Supervisor 89 . n u II o ii ~ II 11 tl II II In uo ID 11 P II O II II N II fl II II ~O II O CU II .p II II N II II ^' 11 Y' ~ II O O 11 •Q ,~ 11 I I M II II II II O f10 II O CO 11 •O (' II J -(' II . ~ a ..~ _ I I •L. ~ it d P II o 00 11 e>o It N J I I 11 to it d ~ 11 11 S~ 11 J_ P 11 N _ II P 11 d II Vl I I 11 ~'1 II _ II it O P II P II O II 11 ti II II JI O N 11 O 2 P 11 a0 II P II II N it II II I I M II O P 11 !~ 11 O .7 I I P II II it II ' J II O P I I 11 ~ 11 II O 11 r II n I I /' II 1!1 II O • ' P II O II ~ _` II V II .- X II d II II 11 •O it O P II .O II • 11 II M II J II 11 11 n II O P II O 11, 1 II - II ~ II ~ II II II C0 it O P II I~ 11 Ln /'~ 11 11 u II 7 it II ' O• II O I O• II 1 ii P 11 .- II II II II • II I I II II II 11 II ' 11 II I N J g I I ~° r u I II O II to I 11 M 1 II LL I I ~ ,_ u a M J II O LL O 11 Y K it U ~ ii a ° ° ° ° ° °o 0 0 0 0 0 o u '°- ~ M O O O II N N N .- ~ 11 0 O O O O 0 O O to N O P M O M S O v 0 v P N O •O W O O O M M P O O M O O O O O O O O O P O .-• o ~ o • ~ r II d ' it O1 I I ~ O pOp ~ •O ~ N O ~ O O O O O O O .O O u 11 II a .. ' N 11" N N ~ ~- ' r II II II /' O O P O I~ p ... O O O O O O O O O II 11 II M O J U ti W O p. pry O II II M M r r .-• N - ~ II I I II 11 II O ~ ~p N t!1 I~ O 1 O O O O O O• P ~ N .P O ~ ~ 11 11 1 M .- N N N N ~ .11 I I II 11 . O O P O N O O O ~ O O O O O O O 11 ~ O ~ N P ~ O II ~ M In N M N M ~ ? N 11 II . L II O/ - II ~ 11 N N 0 0 0 0 0 ~o a ec O ti 1f1 ^ ~ N P 11 u •O •O M ~t -M 1 ~ N ~ II t - Of M S jj 11 oc O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O b O~ O ~. O 11 ~ - C M e- O ~ h ~ h ~ II !~ `~ M mot' d~ V1 ~ P .p ~ ~ ~ ~~ M M V M ~t u1 II u C O O ~ O ~ O ~ O O ~.r~ . O q~ O O ~ 0 O _ O ~ O ~ 11 II ~t e0 . ~ N O ~ M 0 N ~ . O 11 {q E d l y . .. .. II O ~ O S O O ' ' N ~ ~ ti ti_ ~ . ~ ~ II • W O P II p II W ' ~ N ' ~ ' : ~ O O O ~ - O O 0 ~ ~ . :. 11 ). O ~7 Ifl ' N O 0 O ~ ~ O ~ ~, ~ . N ~ ~ 1 ~ N . _ ti 11 II 00 ~ r. ~ N t0 1>0 v M •O ~ v1 ,•O ,f\ 11 . 11 _.i P P . ' i ~ 11 p ~ ' O • O M O O ~ O . pp ~ O I~ O ^ .O . -~. O _ . O O ~ O .. O _ ~O O ' II II ~.. N N . •O ~t O ~ .O I~ p . f~ ^ N ~ N ~p O0 00 P ~ , . ~ ~ . ~ Vl W ~ ~ ', ~ M P 11 II .. UI, ,r 11 v t O ' ~ O O O •O 0 I . O O O ` ~ , O O I I 11 Y O/ . ~ ~ r .. h 1n .~ . ` M ~Q . ., ~ , ~ N 1 . II „ p ' ~ ~p L. ~ ~ p ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ p '~ II • • ^ 11 O f pp P ~ O ~ •O ti ~ _ O t` ~O. O ~ - O - p. O II 11 11 U . ' f ~ P .Q P .. 0 11 ~ r .t P O O N • ? 0, ~ p • , f+1 0 0 M IL. . 11 ~~ . II 1 . O O ,~ O ~ . µp O . O . , ~.O ~.~ p : O' r0 p.. - ~0.~ . .0 .:O . ~ O II .. ' .P M ~, ~ N I ~ O t11 II ~ ,~ ' _ . ' .. , 11 I I O O O O 1 O O 00 O '. O O O- O ~ O O ' O~ O II M ~ ~ O M N ~ ~ .. ~ P !1 _ - • ~ ~ Y ~ ( ^ O X O O O O 0 O _ O 0 O O ~ ~ ~ N V1 pM~ Q P p, ~ In M O t~ M ~ .p f~ O . ... 0 N O '. 00 it - 11 . O N N P ~t ~ M _ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ 00 CO I I II ( ( y~ O N N ~ N ~ e - N ~ P O N 11 LL X ~ II ' ~ II II Z !- . ~ ,fV ~ ~ ..,., .~ - 11 11 II M O -- N ~ r- ~ .v ~ 11 M ~ M M X X II = 1+- ~ m X H X 2 N ~ ~Op ~ X ~ ~ ~ 1 II /~ ~ e-- ~ X m N X O O .' U u ~ < ~ = c7 3 n II °C \ v U ~ C7 C7 - . ~~ , D .t r- ~fM ~t J>0 UN e -^ d j~ " ~ ~ oc ~ F- r r- r- ii T X M u X M X M M ~ U U X W~ X XN W ~ . ~t .T 3 .t X X X OC GY OC d' ~ . W W M II . O ` O O O O CW7 ( 7 C C 1' CC IY Q II - . C7 O a F a a i A [ M M M M M Q 4 Q (7 Ca V1 N / " ~ 1 - F - t U ~ K 2 11 7 i ~ r " ° ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ d~ °C a ~ Q Vl U M LL C ~t a K ~t a ¢ 2' 1 `~ J K .- ~ r tl H S c S i • S c S c ~c ~e ~ °` S° °~ a ~ ~ a ¢ ¢ ¢ a a a a a ii ,~ • - ~ ~ r U '~ I'.) c ~ U ~ Z Z Z . it ~L d 2 ~. d . .. a n .. Y' } Q Q Q Z Q Z Q e ~~ .~ • ~~ i l i ~ti ,.. i ri •~ r F~~ Y,'i 3j ;~ . ~~ ,:i ~~~ ,~.f ~~ .~ ~~ • {r1 4a • ~~ l..f ,,~ ~1 ~• ~r ,~. ~~ ' r~ ~. ~~ § 105-285 MAClI1NLRY ACT § 105-285 Art~'1cL>; 14. Tirne for Listing arid Appraisi~ag Property for Taxation. § 105-285. Date as of.which property is to be fasted and appraised. (a) Annual Listing Required. -All property subject to ad valo- rem taxation shall be listed annually. (b) Personal Property; General Rule. -Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the value, ownership, and place of taxation of personal property, both tangible and intangible, shall be deter- mined annually as of• January 1. (c) Repealed by Session Laws 1987, c. 813, s. 12. (d) Real Property. -The value of real property shall be deter- mined as of• January 1 of the years prescribed by G.S. 105-286 and G.S. 105-287. The ownership of real property shall be determined . annually as of January 1, except in the following situation: When any real property is acquired after January 1, but prior to July 1, and the property was not subject to taxation on January 1 on account of its exempt status, it shall be listed for taxation by the transferee as of the date of acquisition and shall be appraised in accordance with its true value as of•January 1 preceding the date of• acquisition; and the property shall be taxed for the fiscal year of the. taxing unit beginning on July 1 of the year in which it is acquired. The person in whose, name such property is listed shall have the right to appeal the listing, appraisal, and assessment of the property in the same manner as that provided for listings made as of January 1. In the event real property exempt as of January 1 is, prior to July 1, acquired from a governmental unit that by contract is making payments in lieu of taxes to the taxing unit for .the fiscal period beginning Jtily 1 of the year in which the property is acquired, the tax on -such property for tyre f scab period beginning on July 1 immediately following acquisition shall be one half of the amount of the tax that would have been imposed if the property had been listed for taxation as of January 1. (1939, c. 310, s. 302; 1945, c. 973;1971., c. 806, s. l; 1973, c. 73Ci; 1985, c. 65G, s. 21; 1987, c. 81.3, s. 12; 1993, c. 485, s. 17.) _ Legal Periodicals. - Por comment, "Otter to Purchase and Contract: 13uyer CASE Legislature inadvertently omitted a comma between the words "mer- cantile" and "manufacturing" in former subsection (c) of this section when the statute was revised. In re Mitchell-Ceu•olina Corp., 67 N.C. App. 450, 313 S.1J.2d 81G, cec•t. denied, 3T1 N.C. 401, ;319 S.Js.2d 272 (1984). Discriminatory Caxatioq of rail- roads by State held unlawful. Clinchfield R.1Z, v. Lynch, 70O T'.2d 12G (4th Cir. 1983). 13eware," see 8 Campbell L. Rev. 473 _(1986), NOTES ~PPlication of North Carolina's ad valorem property tax to imported tobacco destined for domestic mar- kets does not violate the import-export clause or the due process clause of the I'ederiil Constitution. R.J. Reynolds To- bacco Co. v. llurhmn County, 479 U.S. l30, 107 S. Ct. 499, 93 L. Ld. 2d 449 (1986). . Consistent with the suprenmcy clause, a State may impose ra nondiscriminatory ad valorem property tax' on imported 80 3'S ~- • .4 ~~~.~. . , ..... . ,. • k, gc he fa ;`Ai? s, ~: T };: ti t! P e. tl E 1 1 f l 1 ,..- § 105-187.3 105-187.3. Rate of (a) Amount. -The rate percent (3%) of the retail val ' ~s issued. The tax is payable" more than one thousand dol a Class A or Class B motoi defined in G:S. 20-4.01. Th Hundred dollars ($1,500) for °'vehicle. (b) Retail Value. -The re .of title is issued because of'a price of the motor vehicle, ` when it is delivered to the p `by the retailer for a motor v~ for the purchased motor veh a certificate of title is issued who is not a retailer is the m allowance given by the selle partial payment for the purl parties exchange motor veh either party gives additiona retail value of a motor vehic] of a reason other than the sa vehicle. The market value of `. set in a schedule of values a~ (c) Schedules. - In adopt Commissioner shall adopt a s. values of motor vehicles- as manual. (1989, c. 692, ss. 4.1, s. 1; c. 390, s. 30.) ART. 5A. HZ^~HWRY USE TA;t ~ §105-1$7 5 ~. .. .. "the use tam imposed by thisf`~lrticle is three; of a motor vehicle for which a certificate of title` provided in G.S~.,105-187.4. The tax may not be; rs ($1,000) for each certificate;€~f title issued foi•' vehicle that is ar commercial ;motor vehicle, as: tax may not: be: more than one thousand five ' Bch certificate. of title issued fo'r any otl~~r motor it value of a motor vehicle for ~ihich a certificate - ile of the motor vehicle by a retiailer is the sales :lading all accessories attacl~d' to the vehicle chaser, less the ainourit of any allowance given = isle taken in trade as a full or'ptirtial payment e. The retail value of a motor vehicle for which >cause of a sale of the motor vehicle by a seller ket value of the.:.wehicle, less the amount of ariy , for a rriotoi•. vehiicle taken m t;"ade as a full or used motor vehicle. A transact~€in ire wltiich two ' es'is corisiderecl.. a stile regardless of whether consideration. as part of the `transaction. The; " For which a certificate of title.:is"issued because.: " of the motor vehicle is the market value of the.' ehicle is presumed to be the value ofthe vehicle pted by the Commissioner ` g'a schedule of;values for motor vehicles, the edule whose vahies do not exceed the wholesale- - rblished in a recognized auto%iotive reference: Z c_ 770,~s. 74:1$; 1993, c. 467;'s-3; 1995, c. 349; § 105-187.4: i'ayanent of`tax. - (a) Method. =The tax imposed ~by this f~lrticle must ?fie paid to the, Commissioner when applying for a certificate of title'for a motor vehicle. The Commissioner may riot issue a :certificate of tittle for a vehicle until the tax imposed by this Article has been paid. The tax rr~ay be paid m cash or by check. (b) Sale by Retailer. - When~a certificate of title for a motoz~ vehicle is issued because of a sale of the motor vehicle by a retailer, the a~'plicant for the certificate of title must attach A copy of the bill pf sale for the motor vehicle to the application. A'retailer who~;sells a motor,yehicle may ;collect from the purchaser of the vehicle the tax:-payable upon t;he issuance o"E:'a certificate of title for the vehicle, apply for a cartificate..of.titil:e on behalf o.f;the purchaser, and remit the tax due on behalf of the purchaser. If a check'submitted by a retailer in payment of taxes collected under:.this.section is not'<honored by"the financial institution upon which it is drawri~bec~use the retailer's account did ' -not have sufficient funds to pay: the check ~ or ithe retailer did not have . an account'at the institution, the`. Division magi.,SUSpend or rev~bl~e the license issued to the retailer under Article 12 of Chapter 20 of the Genera] Statutes. .:' (1989, c. 692, s. 4.1; 1991, c. 193, s. 1.) § 105-187.5. Altea°nate _tax f®r t~vse wiio refit ob• lease . ~ - me~o~ vehicles. ~. t (a) Election. - A retailer who is engaged :im the busmes~'of leasing or ' renting motor vehicles may elect not to pay,the tax imposed b~ this Article at 2 ,: °813 . .. , J i .' ~:i ~~1 ~~!'~ ',F ;l .:i .~ . NE'W HAN+UVER COLTI~TY ' ~ Taz Department, Listing . .320 Chestnut St, RM 101. - Wilmington, NC 28401: ~ ~ - TELEPHONE 910/341-7136 . , . FAX 91 D/772-7818 . ' ,' d{ri:tine "A Chandler •Listing Supervisor " . . ,, ._ ` ' ..August 28; 2000 ~ . 'Christopher"Taylor1 ~ . . ~~' _ .9`209 Province D'r '' ., Wilmington, NC 28405 • ;RE: ~!AI-LIE APPEAL'P990710121/REFERENCE P980710223 • :Dear Mr Taylor: ~ ,:. - In reviewing the copy of the appeal letter you provided, I see the referenced parcel number is ~" P9807I0223. I have examined our records~to find that you were given.a One time adjustment based upon purchase price for that,referenced tax bill. This is often done as new vehicles do riot have an established- market value for some .time. - 1"his is na"longer a new vehicle, therefore the market-value has been established. I have checked both our ~tabase~ as well as another publication (NADA) to determine if there is an error in the`assessment for ~~our bill P990710121: The published market value ranges from $12,300 to $14,750, not including "`options. One sale does not constitute market .value, therefore we must adhere to the uniformly a lied.~- 'procedures we have in place.. Those procedures recognize established market value for all vehPles. Thee is no error in the assessment_of $12,010, therefore I am unable to reduce your value as re uested. ~ • • ': .. ,..The following inforrnatio_n tna hel Y p you in future years: Upon receipt of your 2000 and subsequent _ ~' years' billings; if you feel the vehicle is in substandard condition, or if there is an excessive number of miles on fhe vehicle, you may wish to contact Frances Gaskin within your appeal period at 910/3 - x7262 for an onsife inspection to determine a possible reduction in value for either of those reason 136. , s. .. . Ifyou have further questions regarding this appeal; please contact our Listing office at 910/34 - ... a membcr_ofthe staff will be ha 1 7136 and ~~.. PPY to assist you, . :..`.Sincerely;.... ,_ ~ ~ Y . 9 ,_ a- ~ ' . n - ~~ - ., . Kristine Chandler ~ " ,. ~ - Listing Supervisor ~ ~ :. ~ :.~ .. ,. ~~" ~ - .. .. _~~ . . . • - : ~ :. " ~~ T_ao FORD 1998 - 9nar anal lrolr-la lyff ~ FORD 1998 T-at 1 Mo. M. S.q, P, Wdp81 (orn gsfrll ~ 1998 FORD-AT-PS•AC•Conllnusd Boor MadU Irade•In iYPf ` ~ j 1200 AM x(T Trim Mo, "-'---- N. S. A.I. WdpAl torn Adrll . ,........ 1900 AM Eddie ....................'.............'...... Bauer idm .1200 1200 1998 TOAD-A7~PS-AC-Conllnued ~ ~, ' ..................................... 2900 AN Limlad (rim 1900 1900 ECDMOUXE E150•h Toa•Y/ ............. ............................... M/ Power Sunmd .........._ ........................ AM CanD.cl Disc Pla . er 2860 2960 600 900 18000 Cary o Van..............._....................E11 ECO90U9f E250.1( Tw•YI 519795 x650 14100 16180 ' y ..........., .'....'............ AM 1MCN SWeo Syslain .........................._.. 290 AM Paver 5.a1 x00 700 260 260 16600 l'ar E24 9n Ven .................. .... ..... ..... ... 17450 Super Caq>n Van S24 110105 5011 /466019176 . ~~ 1 ' ............................................... 400 AM lutlw &ab 200 .................. ........ ECONOl19E EJ66.1 iakYl 70805 51x5 . . 1672620280 ~ ' . ........................................... 120 AM lupgapa Ftad ... ..... ..~...........' .................. ~ V)rw)s 4110 400 129 128 17060 fa,po Van .....................................EJ4 18000 Super Cane Van . . SJ1 177705 1768 5)56 16x60 20700 _.. " ' ........................... x09 AM Anli•TMA7R !W++rY Sy6am 1~ 300 . ........................ ~ x60 Add Canpaa Disc Player................... . 5 5195 ~ 16200 21700 ' . ............:....... 9W AM SOL V8 E^pat. .................................. ..... 200 ~ 9adrd W!M Paw, WMrdowa x00 100 9eo 960 .. . 226 Add Power Seal.................. ... x60 'Add NumuwMAlI ..................... oy wheals ..... ...... . 960 ~ 160 ~.~ 6 ~ ,.:. .. ....................... 12.6 9a~dat( Wrout Paver - Ooor lodra ............ 176 ....... 9da1 Wrout Cmna ConUd ~ Y00 128 726 ..................... ~ 660 Add Rear Air Conddi0nirq.~ .................... ... `-300 AM MG~ThelURecove S ry yslsm ...... ... .. 160 ~ ~ ' ........................ 121 9aaLe1 Wloul Ttll SW Wlwel ............ 600 1a+Mct W/nul nrq ...... AubmaUt Treoa 176 176 126 126 ............... 2700 Add 1.JL VB Turbo Daael Enpina............. . - 226 Dadact W;oul Power Windows .... ..._ : ~ ~ . x00 x00 . ..2700 2700 ~ ,~ ~ '• . ~ . . ~ . .................. .... 1Mf199TW-Y9f199 E00 600 .. .............. 175 Dedatt Wioul Power Door Locks .......:._.. 225 Dadal Wloul Cerise ContrW ... _... 226 ~?26 :. n ~ , 175 176 ! 1 _ ti46p Grpo Van A5/ 518110 ... ... 75/8 1212616926 ~ 176 Dada) W/al Tdt Sleerinp Whesl _. , 650 Dadad V6 Erq rb ,, ", 226 226 176 176 ' Ip~ W,~ Ga ASt 19780 A51 71080 W spon Lx .. " J7f0 7787 13600 17678 14400 16660 ......, 625 Oadatt Wlwl Ax CorMdan~ M ... .... AAN6EA•V, Taa•YI ... . _ 660 660' 'F~ -626 :026 f' y .... .A51 26705 2 200 apor~ LmMd ~ x00 Adf CompDaq D,sc Pl ' ~ ~'~t 7~ 7916 'L001 ~ 17076 21860 1920027176 10050 PKkup Slylesde RIO• '= 10150 P A 111.785 . 7070 ~• 12300 " ' ayer 260 All JBl Prarnxan Sand Sysbm "' .x00 ..900 rr up Slytasufe LO RIO ~ ' ,.12350 PiGup FUreside S lash RI - 11655 JOB6 91 12400 ' 200 AM Paver Sp1 ISk1. LX Lirrxledl .. .. ~ ~. M6 Add leadtd Saab l5ld i ii -..:~ '.260 : p O • / 2550 PKAup Slyleside Supercab . RI1 ; 11850 P r 11915 `..11810 7116 7710 .: ~ 111 .' 11300 76 1 ' . L n ladl 121 AM luppape RacA ... .. 400 400 knp Flaresde Suporrab Spash AIP 700 AN XlT Inrn 16575 7626 17375 17426 " . .... 000 AM R wM~a ... .~q - . ~ ' .," ,.. ~ r, 1?6 x00" ... .. •3000 AN / WMeI Dnve ... _ " 300 AN Compact Qsc Pla .. ~ . _ . 3700030W ~ 6 .. 101 S>ad9d Wloul Syal«n....... ... ~ .~ .660 ~ .. ~ ..;.200 AM Parer W. .. •. .. ndvws ~.... ' 125 AId Power Doerr Lour .. ~•.2~00 ,` ~ ~• 111 1a0me1 Wloul Pawn Odor lode laded W/ov1 C,urw Conhd ~ '~' 200 200 126 ..128 s ... . ~ 2lX( AId Paw, Seal. ~• ...... -" .175 ~ AM Chose Conhd ~ . ~ 1 ~;~. i~ I ri 776 lodad Wloul ia(.Sh.rrq YYned ... . - ~ Udnct WION N CwAbun,n • ~'. ~ 178 ' 176 126 126 - ".-:725 Add Tdt Sleen 1 .. . rrvv~~ Whoa .. ( 300 Adl N MA ...~ . , . . 176 126 128 ! ; p ..: ..~.. 1~44•i Toa•Yi :... .776 778 ~ . umuw Wy Wheels ;'.. •300 AddM1rIMNRewverySyslern. 6 ~ 300 ' 19110 .. ~ : E 11 ~ • 517770 ' i p)~ Ck,b ty~ ND ' '. 5115 , 16400 21 ~ 718 7 0 DadacT 1 Cy1 Enpxte.:.. ... B r , .: . "; 00 'IhdretWla,l Aultxna)x; Tram _ ' ~ . • . ; . ,~ ' ~ 600 '7~ T • .R ., 20660 ~ ~ ..:E71. 75155 " Super Club W Adl XL1 Tnm~ SJ1 26970 '. 5787 8070 • 0 17900 22106 1 9800 29 "776 6aad ~ Vnoul Mr Conddarxnp ,~... : 1 w 5 as.V~n Jrd (puhpt W 0te model a denples 1 WD ,` . "~ .. ~ 776 .776 .• . ` ~ , '~ .. 5 60 FS 54Yr ~Taa•YI `„ `• ~ ~ , - - ~~? ~ , U , x60 AM Compact Dlsc Res - ~ •22 y°f~ - .1860 1660 spy a as WaA Tru:Jr ~ ` 11760 Sl l ' ' 1 ~ ~ ' C 6 AMP x60 Add AtyAAltlaooyy ... ....... Wk ' . - ~6 ,228161 y esxle S 6 / ,.FII' ", /1660 SMes,de 'S' 8' ~,f IT ~ 515025 J9~99 11 4 K ' . 900 Add Rear.Ar Car+dd s - ..... . ~-~- 900 Add M41heNR ... ' - •.. ' 160': `,1811 ~ ..660 c.. 14260 S esxk Xl 6 / .... . ~ ; ~1~350 S esde XL 8' 6 6 . . 1676 1 4260 . U . . . S ~ ..,. Z'IpY AM 77l VB iwbo piaaM.Fngirta..... • 9ed ~~ ,• .900 - 900. . F0T . ~,' ~' 148~00 '9aeiid S 1677 5 J9~ , .; ~rj~697006. C ~ ,.. •~" '~ . aal W7out Puwor Wuxk +h -.,.'_ ' ,/76 9adu.1 Wrovl Power Door L ... ~ Y7110 2)00 ~ 226 226 . . e opercab $ 6 v ~ - 14900 S Y sxk Supen;ab 'S 8' - X1~• Nn 7090 067 . ' ocks 226 l 9alaG1 W/an Cnnae Conud ~ '' - 176 9aiatl WIaA T(I S`"" ` •' 1T6 '„ 176 226 22 " 77300 Sl sxle Superob XL 6'/.' X1T ~ ' 174110 6lylesvle Surxrca0 XL B')(l i' "t~15- ~ ~i0.il 18425 17478 _ S v "` . ~. _ 660 9Mact V6 Engne tesrxy Wheel ~... ~ 6 '. 176 ..176 ~ . 18050 Flaresule 5u porcab XL 6 r' ~ ,.X117' i .18505 - 19099 ,: INI .1120 16675 20200 i . 16260 20876 , r . 82b 6artecl wrest Aa CorxliGOn ~ :. ,~_.. • 660 .:660. .:. 256-'f Ta~Ye ~ _ ~•, ~ i W • ' d ~ ~ , '. , ~ ' •. ~~ SEE PAGE T-2 FOR AOOrTIONAL OPT10N8 ~ ~.. 1WDa JANVAgY IPDa !~6 826 ~ e na es tM Truck 13 SlyfesWe 'S' 8' f17• ~ 116710 47(X7 ~ '11700 16460 I lr". t It SEE PAGE T•7 fOR ADOfTIONAL OPT R ~ IONS ,~:~ t 3 •, SOUTTIEABTERN EO ITIOfI i . , ,_ . .. ~ , •1 ; I ,t . ~ - r~ ,. '. ~ -. ~ ~ , f: : .. : ~. ,, ~ ., .. ;' . .. ' ~ FAIRWAY FORD, IIVC. ~ -^ ~~ • BURGAW, N. C. 28425 dG - . PHONE 259-2371 . WII.MiNGTON 762-3235 ~ g y 02/08/ 44 ,cISTOPHER TAYLOR C DATE BiflTH DATE R HA ER's NAME ~~0~ ~ROVINCE OR WILMING?ON KC ' 28405 ~'P ' sTATE CITY - MAILINGADDRESS •7 910 6/ 5-7254 9I0) 452'-5622 BUSINESS PHONE RESIDENCE PHONE ~ CASH. DELIVERED PRICE OF VEHICLE 11 L4 VEHICLE BEING PURCHASED NEW• LEASE ENTER MY ORDER ^ USED CAR- . TRUCK - OR THE FOLLOWING ^ DEMO C] OTHER ~ ACCESSORIES .~R 98 MAKE_ FORD TRUCK . ~ . BODY . AOOEL ;~Rtes~~NGER .. TYPE TK , - . ~ . , .. . TRIM CLEARCOAT GRAPHITE . .. .-..~ ~ ' . 1 71FICATION NO. ENG-NE ~~~TYR10C4~1UC89166 ~ TYPE .; ~ • ~~ ~ - 4 ... : _ .,.,•. '' MILEAGE " r.i F~~. 14 . STOCK NO. - . ST6576 - . SALESMAN JEFF PRUITT' .. ; .. -, :~' :, °.'... _ , . USED VEHICLE TRADED IN AND/OR OTHER CREDITS • , MAKE OF TRADE-IN ANY WARRANTY ON THE ITEM/ITEMa BOLD HEREBY ARE THOSE y ~n MODEL BODY MADE BY THE MANUFACTURER. THE SELLER, FAIRWAY FORD, INC. HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER ., COLOR ~ EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY. IMPLIED WARRANTY OF -" USED VEHICLE TRADED IN ANDIOR OTHER CREDITS MERCHANTABILITY oR FITNESS FoR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, • AND FAIRWAY FORD, INC. NEITHER ASSUMES NOR AUTHORIZES • ANY OTHER PERSON TO ASSUME FQR IT ANY LJABILITY IN CON- MAKE OF TRADE-IN. ' NECTION WITH THE SALE OF THIS ITEMIITEMS.. ' YEAR .MODEL :. .-. , BODY ... ,. .,. ,, ~„ COLOR ~ ~ ,• • ~ ' ., . _ , .IDENTIFICATION NO. . BALANCE OWED TO Dash "Price of Vehicle & Accessories ~ :ADDRESS:. ..- _ STATE AND LOCAL;TAXES 334 29 `' ~ N * A ' ' ` USED TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE ~ ~ ;fer " ~ ' ~ ~ e Trari i • ' ' ' ' N A , . . . , . t cens Liceriae, L F BALANC6;OWED ON TRADE-IN ee Tlt-e, Re istratlon " 'NET ALLOWANCE ON TRADE-W ~ sir TOTAL PRICE OF UN '" 1153 $ 6 7C ~ , ~ ,DEPOSIT N A LEFT ' ~ NSFERRED FROM ` TOTAL CFiED1T : ~ cot uMN ' ~ ~ c t REBATE ~ . _ ; 'CASH WITH ORDER ., . ;.{~, ~ 1OS36: ~ . D CASH BALANCE DUE ON DELIVERY .. ' S "'.TOTAL CREDIT (TRANSFER TO RIGHT COLUMN) $ UNPAI ::~. -. • ', ~ .' •' t ,° ~ ` ; ` "Purchaser agrees that this Order Includes all of the terms and conditions on both the face and reverse side hereof, that,ihis Order,cancels and supersedes t ' o the subject statement of the terms of the agreement relating any prior agreement and as of the date hereof comprises the complete grid ~excluslve hereby, and that THIS ORDER SHALL NOT BECOME BINDING UNTIL- ACCEPTE~BY DEALER OR HIS AUTHQRIZED REPRESENTATIVE ` ~ .; matters covered , ~-q „ °.. . •. Purchaser by his execution o1 this Order acknowledges that he has rand Its terms and condhlons and has received a_true copy of this Order. _ / ~ N T S ` ' ~. .{. 'J A S SIG URE - PURCHASER ~ :- f / -DATE O $ ,~ VV ~<..JJ `, . .. ., '1. ~ ' 4 ~KVOeue Iuuenl n.,~,oa,.r+.r~pb• - RETAIL ORDER FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE ~ F • ,k_ ~I, ... .. - , r ,.r - ,'H: •. .NEW HANOVER COUNTY .BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . • REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . ~ Meeting Date: 11/13/00 .._ .. - -: ,• .. Regular Item #: 9 Estimated Time: Page Number: • ~,. ~ Department;` Engineering Presenter: Dave Weaver7Greg Thompson ~ . Contact: Dave Weaver/Greg Thompson ~ . • ~ SU BJ ECT: `~ ~ .Review of Mason Inlet Relocation Project grid Approval of Budget:Amendment ` ' BRLEF SUMMARY; , The .attached memo outlines the remaining steps ih the permit-process that must be achieved in ' • order to construct the Mason Inlet Relocation Project during this winter dredging season. . ~ ~ . RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: - Staff is.requesting that the Board approve the following action: ,• ' - .. - 1. Di-rect staff to continue to take`the necessary steps"to obtain the permits and "to construct the4 project this year, as outlined in the attached memo. u " ." 2. Approve attached budget amendment #01.0072 in order to establish the funds to continue to - pay-ATM for preparation of specifications and continuing engineering work ($200,000). The ' ` project is estimated to cost approximately $4.0 - $6.0 million to construct.. Alfhough funds • will be provided up-front by the Beach renourishment portion of the Room Occupancy Tax " ~ .Fund, these funds will be reimbursed through an already established assessment process. FUNDING SOURCE: - _. • . Room Occupanc Tax , ~ • y ATTACHMENTS: ., • • " Memorandum ~ " • R * . t • . BA#01-0072. _ .. ; • - .REVIEWED BY: ~ ~ ., . ? ~ LEGAL: • FINANCE: Approve ` BUDGET: ;- HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recomend approval for staff to take the necessary steps to obtairi permits and to nstruct the' ~, project. In addition; recommend approval of budget amendment #01-0072. . ."COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: .. ... ; Nr .. - , ..,~ .. ~" . • REJECTED ~"` u.j `-~ - • ,. REMOVED rt „,. - - "Si,~ i 3 "`Y - - . POSTPO ~' `; . NED .. 99 .• ~. ~ ~. ~ 'l v~' . --~ ~`~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD ~OF'COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION ... Meeting Date: 11/13/40 , Budget Amendment •, ~ .. ~ - ~ . , .: ,~ ' DEPARTMENT:.Room Occupancy Tax Fund /Mason Inlet Relocation ,,, , . ._,:.. ~ Capital Project. NEW HANOVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE v;isti•:iivi}}i}:~!v:?:Cti~ii$:~i<::~ ~`v::i:~:~. `~':: :: ~::\~i: }$:<vii:~ii:•:vivii}:::2 ,~~~ti.~~ictw ~%'~:ati~sr\.~ti~`2<?:'~'.•'i`;`;•~•;~ti•a.~:v:.a>::a::~•:Sa:::•:'t::~::~~ti:a~~:2:.::~~,.x.:::a::;aaa:::o~:,•••::;:::a;.~\\.~~~ \w,~~~~ •.~ti, ~ November 2, 2000 • TO: Board .of Commissioners FROM: Dave Weaver, Assistant County Manager ~ ~ RE: Mason Inlet Relocation Project - The attached letters to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the U. S. Corps of Engineers are an effort to speed up the permitting process for the Mason Inlet Relocation Project. In order to make this Project happen this winter dredging season, the following time frame needs to be met: .Ongoing - Bid specifications being prepared by ATM l l/15/00 - Project advertised by County for bids 12/07/00 - Bids opened by County 12/11/00 - Contract awarded by Board of Commissioners 12/29/00 - .Corps complete re-write of Environmental Assessment - O1/10/01 - Permit awarded by Corps - O1/15/O1 - Mobilization begins by dredging company 01/30/01 - Project begins by dredging company ,04/30/01 - Project complete . This is a very tight and rather optimistic time schedule, with the maj or obstacles to the permitting process as follows: - Although the Corps has deemed our Environmental Assessment to be complete, the Corps has decided that their staff must re-write our EA into a more useable decision document. This is the process planned to be complete by December 29. .~ 101. Board of County Commissioners Page Number Two November 2,'2000 - The USFWS must also perform two tasks: - The USFWS must write a Biological Opinion, which is anticipated to be complete by mid-December. We are pushing for this process to speedup, since the USFWS has had the necessary materials to do so for months. - The USFWS must issue an "incidental takings statement," which basically describes the amount of endangered and threatened species that maybe impacted. Although turtles and seabeach aramanthus may' be impacted, the greatest concern to the Project is the possible presence of the Piping Plover =Great Lakes population. The USFWS would prefer for the County to monitor the site for at least one year and then, ' to perform the project in 2001/2002. Staff, after discussion with our consultants, believe that our best opportunity .is to move forward this . year, if~possible. ~ :. . . ~ - The State must issue several permits, including a 40.1 :water quality certification. These permits are not anticipated to be'obstacles at this time. :. - : . ' Several problems may arise that.could easily delay the project unti12001/2002. . ;~ ,' ; - The permit condition negotiations between the County and the Corps at the : . first of the year could be difficult and time''consuming. ~~ ° ~ ' ~ _ - The USFWS could appeal the issuance of a Corps permit. The appeal could ~ . take up to 90 days. ,,, f - The contract between the County and the dredging contractor must be worded such that it only takes effect if a permit.is successfully gained by the County ,~, before June 15. A conditional contract of this nature likely will result in higher bids than if the project is delayed until next year - ~. . . .~~ . ~ ... - Please feel free to contact me or Greg Thompson if. you have any questions or . comments. _ ° , ~ , .. ~' , . . .' ~ °~• , :.. s_. ,,5, .. 102 ~ :: t.~ (. W ~~~®~~~ ( ®f I ~W ~VALLEN O'NEAL . v lJ 1 \\ i County Manager. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER - 320 CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM SO2 ANDREW J. ATKINSON Deputy County Manager WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4045 . TELEPHONE (919) 341-7139 PArRICIA A. MELVIN - Assistant County Manager - FAX (919) 341-4027 - .. DAVID F. WEAVER. _. ~ Assistant County Manager 414 Chestnut Street, Room 101 . -• ~'. - ' .. Telephone (910) 341-7139 ' . _ ~ Fax (910) 341'-4035 ` ` October,31, 2000 ~ " ~ '. Mr. Kevin Moody ,. ". , , , US Fish and Wildlife Service ` -. 651-F Pylon Drive Raleigh, N.C. 27606 ~ ` ~~ RE: Mason Inlet Relocation Project -~ ~ ~ - ' ' Proposed Construction Schedule `,. ' ~-~, :Dear I~TVdy: . , ; . _ Thank you for arranging a time to meet with the County last week. ~ We appreciate your. concerns pertaining to data deficiencies on piping plover overwintering for the Mason ~' Inlet Project area. ._ ... .:. . .The County reviewed the recent conditions at the site and believes that the proposed . ', construction schedule, to begin work on January 15, 2001 and complete work on April 15, - 2001, is essential; considering the risks associated with delaying the Project. ~ ' .. As you are aware,"the ternporary~ geotextile containers that, protect the Shell Island ' :~ , .• ":Hotel and adjacent properties are beyond their expected design life; and sections of these _ `containers are damaged. Thus, the containers *are at significant risk to~complete failure: As . '.a recent example of this problem, an 80-ft section of a large container was lost due to the ._. - - ' ' ~ impacts of weather, tears and rot. .~ "''~ ` .. . _ ,, . t . Waiting another,. summer "hurricane'~'~ and winter "nor'easter" season to begin M construction places this property at considerable risk to loss. For these reasons, we believe • at delaying the project construction to 2001-2002 is not a reasonable option. t ,: We appreciateyour.assistance in completing rocessin ofthe Project a licatio n ~ ` p g J pp nla~ad3 - ~ 1 \ ~~ 111 \ 0~ a'~~ ~ O V 1 \ ~ 1 ALLEN O'NEAL -- County Manager OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER 320' CHESTNUT STREET, ROOM SQ2 A"DREW J. ATKINSON ,I Deputy County Manager WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2.8401-4045 ` • TELEPHONE (919) 341-7139 PwTRtC1A A. MELy~N ,' Assistant County Manager FAX'(919) 341-4027 - DAV1D F. WEAVER ' Assistant County Manager - 414 Chestnut Street, Room 101 Telephone (910) 341-7139 .. October3.1, 2000. Fax (910) 3a1-ao3s . Mr. Wayne Wright , • • , USACOE - , 69 Darlington Avenue ~ _ _ - Wilmington; N.C. 28403 ~ ~ '~ ,. . - RE; '_ Mason'In1et Relocation Project ,"`, ;.. '. - . -.Dear Mr. Wright: .." ~. - ... ` As you are aware, the County and our consultants met with the USFWS on October 23, 2000. - - The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the current schedule to complete the Biological Opinion ,and Section 7 Consultation and the Section 404 Permit Application Review. -They have indicated that.. the earliest date we can expect the Biological Opinion and Consultation is early to mid-December. -. .. ~.; • Although USFWS has indicated that no final decision has been made on the Section 404; they. ' :, stated their, concerns pertaining to mitigation for "affected Inter-tidal shoals." To minimize the " ; potential for further delays in processing the Section 404 Permit, we are requesting that the USACOE take action to allow for an expedited review of any negative recommendationthatmay beforthcoming - °'~• from USFWS. _ . ,. _. . "' Please contact. meat your earliest convenience upon receipt of this letter. - • ?- Sincerely, • . • t ': ~ - - .. ,. . - LW~ .. ,~ - ~~ ,. - - David F. Weaver • , ....- , .- ,. Assistant County Manager: - << ~ - - ~' '~ ,` New Hanover County .. - r _ -: 'cc: ~ Congressional delegation ~~ _ - . , - .. • . .., .. • "Board of County Commissioners ~~ : -.: ~ ~' -~ ~~~°~ ` ~~~ "...: .: Allen O'Neal, County Manager ' :.. _- . . <• . - .. - Greg Thompson, Chief Project Engineer ; ~ - Colonel DeLony u , e _ .. Karyn Erickson, P.E. - _ , ~` '• Steve Morrison, Land Management Group, Inc. ' : ' "~ v ~ - ~ ~ - - 105:x: . . - . ,. , - - • I~ 7 ~ - NEW~HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION i ~ Meeting Date: 11%1.3/00 ` ~~~, ~, ',~" . ;. Regular Item #: 10 Estimated Time: Page Number: ,. ` .. Department: Sheriff Presenter:. Sheriff Joseph Lanier/Andy Atkinson; Contact: Sheriff Lanier SUBJECT: Community Oriented Policing Services Grant Award - . ,, BRIEF SUMMARY: .The Sheriff's Dept. has been awarded a COPS grant in the amount of $1,170,554 to~fund the ~' ; salary•and#ringes'for l1.`School Resource Officers~for`3 years: The County must appropriate $150,000 to fund operating and startup costs for.the initial year of the grant. -After-.the initial' year, there will be an approximate $10,000 annual County cost. The application for this grant was , approved afi the 6.5-00 meeting ~of. the Board of Commissioners. This item is for Commissioner's . .;acceptance of the grant and approval of related Budget Amendment #01.0063. ~ - " - - RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS Recommend acceptance of the grant; request authorization for Sheriff Lanier to sign; r,.equest authoriza#ion.for County Manager Allen O'Neal to sign; request approval. of associated Budget Amendment #01.0063: FUN-DWG SOURCE. ~ . Federal $1,170,554 .: ~~, - -, ~ ~ ~ , ,County $ 150,000 '~' ~ ' , ~ ~ . .. ~ . Please remember the Count is re wired to fund the officers for one ear with local fundin after, the. grant funding ends - , ATTACHMENTS: .. .: , ., , ,, ~ BA #01-0063.wpd . :. ... REVIEWED BY: .. , . . - LEGAL; FINANCE; Approve BUDGET: Approve , HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A ;. ~`~ COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ` - Recommend- acceptance of grant and approval of associated budget amendment. ,..COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: - . - r ,. ' f - ~ ~ ;t,t'1 ,. ~ REJECTED p , Y iI' :RENO ~ ~, .~ . . ~~~~~~¢f. - . ~~R~ .~~ ~ ,107 ,. ,. - ~, .. . ~, - . ~ i NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COiVi11NiSSIOIVERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION .. ., , ~ ~ . . Mesf9ng Dater 11/13/00 ., Budget Amendment .. < 9 :.p. ~ K•. ~~a pa~ae~ra~3sa• ~• ~tc3t7d2~ ce~rr~ees~~~+ ,. ff9pY3tt~ .. ~~ ~ ~cf~ritbit5 ~Fr <3~1€~ i ' ~ _ x a: . r~3~aazr~ ~ s~ En:Einei~ia~tEsvn ~cf . News & Information ~;fF~~~# ~~t~3~~:t3~~,~~~ = _ t;~s~~ ~;~~~ ~ : PreSS Releases. --- - COPS 5th Year Anniversary ~ ' ~'~~'~~~~3i.3 ~ For Immediate Release-Wednesday, September 6, 2000 Universal Hiring t~n~~t~itF~~.tr~~:~tas ~ Program NHP) A,raw4~€t#.Ysar ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO f~"~' 100 000 Offi _t~~~~~~~f~~.~~~~i~3~s ANNOUNCES ~ . cers Funded .. $68 MILLION IN GRANTS TO HIRE _ • ' ''' ' ''~ SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER ~ Press Releases Archives - - r.~~~E33if~33~Y£E$3~ _ ~ - . ' i < i ' ~ '~lSF63Yr3A33#f~~4' ~f~lid'fS."x~e _ - !~ 289 Communities to Receive 599 SRO's Nationwide ~ ~"; . ~ ~'~' PDF Held Info t r~~k3t3~3 ~.~€ate3~v ` ~ FAIRFAX, VA. -Attorney General Janet Reno and the U.S. '. ` - t^~~r~:~i:~~&Y~ Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented ' Policing Services (COPS) today announced $68 million in ffi~~s grants to hire 599 new police officers to work in schools - across the nation. These grants will go to 289 cities and towns ,, .,. across the country. 1Ne know that if communities, schools, government, law' . enforcement, and community members work together to - ` address the roots of violence, we can make America safer for ~ `~ ~ ° ` ` ~ our children," said Attorney General Janet Reno. "These school resource officers will enhance school safety and ~. ~ enable our children to learn in a secure environment. . ' The COPS in Schools program is an effort to assist . communities in taking a comprehensive approach to ~ ~ • addressing the growing problem of school violence," said ' :.Thomas Frazier, Director of the COPS program. "It is our ' hope that by adding these additional school resource officers " , every child in America will :have the opportunity to go to a ` school that is safe and secure. ` - The COPS program is the Administration's initiative to add 100,000 officers to the beat and advance community policing .. . .nation wide. Community policing is a crime fighting strategy ` ~ ~ ' that encourages !aw enforcement to work in partnership with . ` _ ' - - the community to identify and reduce crime problems: ` ' To~date, the COPS program has funded more than 105;000 officers. President Clinton has proposed continuing the COPS ~ - program for an additional five years to add up to 50,000 more ~ ~ ~ ; ' ,officers to local communities. The officers hired with today's ' _~ grants are the latest installment toward this goal.. ~ - ~ . . Toda ' r ~ O ~ y s g ants were awarded under the COPS in Schools ~ ~ • http://wwvv~usdoj.gov/cops/news-info/press_releasesrpr_09_06_OO.htrri ,. ., . ~ 1`0/25/00 ,.. ... . o. Page 2 of 2 1f j' l\\~~ i~, ,~ a Ili to s, t ~ ~ ~. s] :., ,A 0 U.S. Department of Justice ` Office of Consmunity Oriented Policing Services (COPS) , J' • ffice of the Dn eclor , l 100 Verinan/ Avenue, NW Wnrliiuglun. DC 20530 +. September 11;`2000 ,. ' Sheriff Josepli McQueen ~ ~ `~~~'' - New Hanover County Sheriffs Department ~ ~S " 20 North 4th' Street • - Wilmii~gton, =NC 28401 /7s> ~/.r r.~ ` • ___-~--- Re:" Grant for.New Hanover County Sheriffs Deparnnent ~f NC06500 - 2000SHWX0741 - - - - Dear Sheriff ivlcQueen: . - _. Congratulations on receiving a COPS in Schools Grant Program award from the Office of Community •Oriented Policuig Services for 11 new, additional full-time officer(s) and 0 part-time officer(s) at a cost of $1',170,554. - The grant award start. date for your COPS in Schools Award is 9/1/00, which means that you can be reimbursed for salaries • and`expenses of.additional officers hired after this date. - Enclosed in this package are your grant award and a list of conditions that apply to this grant program. You should read and ' familiarize yourself with these grant conditions. In particular, you should`review the training grant condition. All deparhnerits awarded funding tinder the COPS in Schools grant program are being required to attend a COPS in Schools Regional Training - Workshop. The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COP5) or our designee will be the sole provider for the training, and COPS will pay all reasonable costs of participants for travel, loc biog. and per diem. In order fo satisfy this condition, the officer(s)~ssigned to the schools as a result of this COPS grant, as well as a representative from the partnering _ . school(s).must attend one of these training workshops. We anticipate offering tee n such training sessions between January2000 • . .. , and July 2001, so there should be a training session that meets the scheduling needs of a- 11 n ees. You will receive , - information. on the training dates and locations in the near future, Also included in this package is your Grant Owner`s Manual, which summarizes and explains your COPS ni Schools grant - award through the Universal Hiring Program. Additional information specific to the COPS in Schools Grant Program has also • been provided as well: You will also find materials relating to payment methods and procedures for receiving your grant funds. . 'You. should review the grant materials in your Grant Owner's Manual regarding the two methods of payment available to you: - ~.. We have enclosed a set of mailing Labels for your convenience. You may use the labels to address any correspondencethat you_ send to the COPS Office. To accept your grant, please sign the award document and return it to the COPS Office within 90 days. ' _ Failure to submit the signed award document in this 90-day period. could result in withdrawal of the grant withouffurther notice • -from the COPS Off ce. You must also sign and.return the COPS in School Additional Grant Condition and send it back with your. -award document.... We are pleased that your Department has elected-to participate in the COPS in Schools grant program and look forward to ` • working with you iii a productive partnership to further your' community policing efforts. -Should you have'any questions, please do ` .nofhesitate to contact the COPS Office at 1-800-42i-6770. Your grant advisor will be happy to provide you with assistance.. :... ', - . Sincerely,. - . .. - •, . w, . . . 4 .. , - . .. w . ,• Thomas Fr zier , . ' ,. ,, . -- , . ;"Director - .. .. _ i ~~ lfl.!(!1-tlll'~ c~-tltYtE? ES'tlt'YTed'~ , ~tlOt'1 1~61t1017S 1 I 37th JudCial ~ rout Juvenile Office 1 Ashiarxi, City of 1 0 $105,825 East Prairie, Cityr# 1 0 ~,~1 ~ 1 L.ee's S~.crrrit Police Departrr~er~t q 0 . $87,960 ~ ~ Nbberiy Police Departrr~-fit . 1 , 0 . $.500;000 Pacific Pdice Departrnerrt 0 $103,958 •, . : Springfield Public ScYibols 2. 3 0 , $200,5522 0 $247,524 , 0 $1.ri'~0;680 Nf.S Bay St. Lais, aty of 2 .0 $206 070 • Clarke Canty Board of Supe~yisors .._ : 1- , ~ 0 , $79,242 ~ C~..ilfport Police .. ~~;~ ` , , 5 . 0 , ,. w .. F-~ncock.County Sheriff's [~irtrrel~t. ~ • :~' <,`~ 1 - . $501,9ZO ~ , • Lang i Poke Qe~'trr~t y . .. 0.~ $91,320 . .. . . l.ktiori ~eriff's Qe{aartrnertt . Y 4 ' $85, ` .. ~ . ~0 ~ $349,7 y ,.,, . ,, ., ,. . . _ ~ ~, .. ,. 1 '4' U 1,3 4,1 ~ ., . . . NIT ~ -_ ., , , , ' , .. . .,_ ' ~ , ~. , ~nirx,~s; atyof .. ,~ - . - .Butte Sl'Iver Bove Law E1-rforca~t Age c ~ 2 3 p ~ ~ , ~-_$250,000 . . ~ - . n y .. St. Ignatius, Tovtir~ ~ . ... P, , , . 0 340,050 . 0 , ~ ~:~~ . ,. ~: . .. ., . ~ ~~ ,. . 6 NC ~ ~ • ~` ~ Catawba Coti-rty . ° :~ .: ~ ~ ~' ~ : ~ r s Kings M~t.o-rtam PdiCe . ~ ~ . Deper~tmerrt 1 $327,699 ~ ,~ f V t .~ l -- to l ly P dice D e pe~ trr~ent i. 4 : r :2 0 ~ ,i ~ '~ ~, ~ - `~ rl 1~ ~ y /~ ~ . ~' ~ ry y ~~ y ~ ~ ff s ~ ~ i 1 0 ' W W, ~ \7O . J . , .- . Fender , Ca.rriy Sheriff's Office < . 4 0 $1 170554 Roanoke Rapids Fdice ~t , ° 1 ~ 0 $408,360 • } TransylvarYa Ca.raty Sheriff's ~~t _ ~ 5 ~ 0 ~ $95 699 '' ' - ~ 1Nilson Co~,nty Office of the`Sheriff , ~.. '" `6 . ,, , ~ :,,$589,938 0 $551,120 . . 3;i ~.. U ~ ~~~ l~ Blair, City of t 1 ' 0 $122,514 .. ,. , •~ ~. U 22,514 , ` 6 r~1 2 - I > r NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTIOiV . Meeting Date: 06/05/00 I Consent Item #: 7 Estimated Time: i Department: Sheriff Presenter: j Contact: Fred Clingenpeel SUBJECT: ~. Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Grant Application BRIEF"SUMMARY: Sheriff's Dept. wishes to apply for a COPS grant to fund Salaries and Fringes for eleven (11) . School Resource Officers. Total applied for is $1,170,554 which will fund the 11 positions for 3 years. All COPS in Schools grant recipients must develop a written plan to retain their COPS-funded officer positions for at least one full locally set budget cycle after the conclusion of the federal grant period. No County match will be required if the grant is awarded in the ,above .amount; however, issues such as cars for officers, uniforms, weapons, etc. should be addressed. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS Recommend approval to apply for grant. Request approval of budget amendment if awarded. " FUNDING SOURCE: Federal ~ 1-,170,554 Funding questions in summary are being researched and need to be answered _ • ~ - " ~ ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: LEGAL:'N/A FINANCE: N/A BUDGET: HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval. ` COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: Approved - r~OU COM -~ j 1Oc; APPROV - ..::~: ' REJECTED 'f, ,,_ - REMOVED ~, ,. ,~_ . . .POSTPONED F#EARi•J ~ ~ . - ~~~ ..~.~. "113 {This page intentionally left blank} NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION ' Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 11.1.. Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dextwer Hayes Contact: Baird Stewart SUBJECT: Z=716, 10/00 Applicant; B&M Properties; R-15 Residential and B-1 Neighborhood Business to CD(B-2) Highway Business. ~. BRIEF SUMMARY: 'One parcel in'this request is currently zoned B-1 Neighborhood Business to a depth of 200 feet. The applicant seeks to extend the depth of the commerical zoning district to a depth of 1100 feet. The extension of this commercial district would represent a considerable encroachment into several established residential neighborhoods. Single family homes to the south fronting Porter's Neck Road ahd residential uses to the east in Tibby's Branch would be severly impacted by commercial development on these tracts.. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: The petitioner presented the conditional use site plan. Two adjacent owners spoke in opposition. The primary concerns were drainage, lighting, scale, and noise. There were also concerns raised about limited access to the site and a proposed clubhouse on the site plan. After significant discussion with the petitioner and the neighbors the Planning Board voted 3-3 on a motion to Deny the request. FUNDING SOURCE: - . n/a " .ATTACHMENTS: . . 8 ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ;, .: rCf?UNTY COMMI~I®Nl~' • . APPROVED Dl ` REJECTED ~/~ } REMOVED Ca '~ POSTPONED L7 '~ " HEARD ~.~~r . ,~~31 ~. ~~115 " .. - -J CASE: Z-716, 10/00; APPLICANT: B&M Properties REQUEST: R-15 Residential and B-1 Neighborhood Business to CD{B-2) Highway Business ACREAGE: 7.3 Acres LOCATION: East side of Market Street north of Porter's Neck Road. LAND CLASS: Resource Protection -The purpose of the Resource Protection class is to provide for the preservation and protection of important natural, historic, scenic, wildlife and recreational resources. The Resource Protection class has been developed in recognition of the fact that New. Hanover County, being one of the most urbanized counties in the State, still contains numerous areas of environmental or cultural sensitivity which merit protection from urban land uses .... ! , PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10/5/00: The petitioner presented the conditional use site p1an.,Two adjacent owners spoke in opposition. The primary concerns were drainage, lighting, scale, and noise. There were also concerns raised aliout'the limited access to the site and a` proposed clubhouse on fhe . . site plan. After significant discussion with the petitioner and the neighbors the Planning . Board voted 3-3 on a motion to Deny the request. ,, , BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Ll the spring of 1999, two rezoning applications for this property were processed by the .. Planning Department and heard by the Planning Board. The first application did not include all of the parcels and was ultimately disqualified for lack of access. The applicant returned in June 1999 with a request that met the access requirements and included the same parcels that are included in .~ . this case. Ultimately the Planning Board Unanimously recommended denial of the request from - . R-15 & B-1 to B-2. ~ , The petitioner at that time requested an appeal to the County Commissioners and presented the case in July 1999. After considerable discussion the petitioner withdrew his request ' for a straight B-2 rezoning to pursue a conditional Use rezoning. That petitioner never filed a `conditional use petition. STAFF SUMMARY: '. ` - As shown on the zoning map one parcel in this request is currently zoned B-1 Neighborhood business to a depth of 200 feet. The applicant seeks to extend the depth of the ' commercial zoning district to a depth of 1100 feet.~The extension of.this commercial district " - would represent a considerable encroachment into several established residential neighborhoods. `.. Single fam~i~ly.-homes to~thesouth fronting on Porter's Neck Road and residential uses to the east 4 " ~:Yti4°~~~Sv: 5 ~ ~ U 61n1~.1.d'fi37. in Tibby s Branch would be severel !m acted b commercial develo ment on these tracts: The Compreht,~ensiv~,,~e~p1~n~Qen~courages the development of commercial nodes at major intersections and to locate community level services and trade needs at key intersections or on ~ P'9 eG`~4Qf4~~~1~.~ ' major thoroughfares with appropriate design requirements. Although the location of this proposed boat/auto'storage faci~lity~is~cur~i-ently~near the growing Porter's Neck Road Market Street intersection, the access to thisQsit~ls`u`ultimately going to be from a Cul-de-sac at the end of a 1 ~ service~road~which=isypart<of<theIl7~Bypass. The construction of the bypass is going to have a profound effect on the property in this area. Because the main traffic flow will shift to the west and because the properties along the east side of Market will only be accessed by a service road, it appears that the east side of Market Street will become a more desirable location for continued development of residential projects. The proposed conditional use rezoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive plan, would cause intense land use conflicts, is not consistent with the pattern of development in the area, and based on the plans for the bypass does not have good access. For all of these reasons, Staff recommends denial. Case: Z-716, 10/00 Special Use Permit for Boat/Auto Storage in a Conditional,Use B-2 . ` Zoning District Preliminary Staff Findings - . 1. The board must find that the use will -not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. A. The property is served by the Ogden VFD B. Some County sewer exists in the area, however most of the area is served by individual wells and private septic. C. The site currently has direct access to Market Street. In the future access to Market Street will be from a service road. 2. .The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the zoning ordinance. - ' A. A site plan has been submitted. All conditions and specifications of the zoning ordinance can be met. B. Setbacks and buffer yards are based on building height. C. Several significant trees exist on site. , . 3. The Board must find that the use tivill not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting ' property or that the use is a public necessity.. A. Setbacks and buffering will be required to protect adjacent residential properties. . B. Being a coastal community there is a demand for dry boat storage during the offseason and for day/weekend users. ~ - 4. The Board must find "that the location arid,character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harn~oriy with the area in which it is to be located • and in genera] conformity with the plan of development for Netiv Hanover County." ' A, Other B-2 Hi;hway business districts are located nearby. • ~ ~ • B: According to the Comprehensive Plan; the'property is located in the resource protection land . . classification which was established to provide for the preservation and protection of natural . resources. " ~: ` • Planning Staff Concerns: 1) The site plan does not effectively preserve• any trees on site. Several significant trees are located on the property. .. .. ~ - 2) There appears to be an excessive amoiint~of paving area bettiveen the buildings (90'x). 118 . Case; Z-716, 10/00 • Petition Surnma~~y Data Owner/Petitioner: Sherwin Cribb for B&M Holdings Inc. ~ . Existing Land Use: Unimproved 7onin History July 6, 197 ]. (Area 5) Water Type: Wells Sewer Type: County & Septic Tank Recreation Area: Ogden Park Access & Traffic Volume: 23 000 1 (999 ADT) . ~. . . Fire District: Ogden VFD Watershed & Water Quality Classification• Pages Creek (SA) • ~ ~ . Aduifer Rechar e Area: Fringe of primary recharge area - Conservation/Historic/Archaeologic Resources None ~- Soils: Leon & Lynn I-Iaven - Septic Stiitabilitx Class III, some Limitations due to Wetness & High Water Table • ~ ~ 119 Schools: Blair Elementary . . Boat and Vehicle Storage~Facility for B & M Holdings, Inc. •, . Statement of Use: The planned use of this project is the storage of boats and vehicles within closed Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings. It is anticipated that the~predominate vehicle type will be recreational vehicles. It is not planned'to provide any maintenance facilities on the site other than a wash down area for boaters use. The property is located at the southern end of a proposed service road which is a portion of the Northern Outer Loop'Interchange. Access to the highway will be made through this service road. Temporary access will be made to the' existing Market Street, -until such time as the service road is constructed by N.C. D.O.T. (N.C. D.O.T. has purchased the right-of-way for the service road). ;, ~ , ;. .. . ~, t . - ~ ., °0p tirncnawr:~- o~ncorrncnawrv-~ Sa~7 N •. e °OS ICJ G")O~Om2~ b 1 1 -f~~-2c~rnC ~1 CaODOn C~NOOSOm002 ~'~ •~ m { .. °J ~ °4° gym ~.j OL Z21S C7 3]--iNm== ~ N C Q1 r^O ~ T~~mrrmm ma ~T . O °e° ° . c i~ _ ~ CA 7~ ~COC~D~mm ZZSb ~9rL0'J-~ '._`~ .1 ' ~ ~ ++o+ ~~~ODy~~Q~bmOC~00~ ~~ O ~ w O Z Z ~ j Z= ~ Z~{~~ o~~aarv~ z° Q~ O ~ v ~ rr r ~~ r- ~ ~ n < r cn ~ _ m ~o a zy ~~ ~ z~o m ~ ~ m 1 '~ ?D, ~ ~p amZ ~ ~z °-°-mi N Q0 ~ ® ~ ~,- a as a :~ °e ~- + 1~~ ~ S z ~ m ~s~-~'~~ II ' ~~ ~ a ra- ~ Ct. ' O ,~ ~,. F~' ~ rX_ ~~ fG7 ~e~ Y y ~ t so ° °°e° ° ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h y t ~ t r g y ' ~ x o a c o {`n ~ 3 0 s° e o , ~° > o y ° > c a a .3 ~ o V 6 ~ w dN NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 •. Regular Item #: 11.2 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning 'Presenter: Dexter Nayes Contact: Baird Stewart SUBJECT: Z-71,2,08/00 R-20 Residential to I-2 Industrial Applicant David Barefoot for TF Holdings Ltd. BRIEF SUMMARY: The petitioner is requesting a rezoning from R•20 Residential to l-2 Heavy Industrial. According to the Comprehensive Plan the subject property falls on the border of two different land classifications. There is a pocket of l-2 Heavy Industrial adjacent and south of the subject property. The zoning along the west side of this section of Blue Clay Road is primarily R-20 . Residential. The property to the east and across Blue Clay Road is zoned l-:2 Heavy Industrial and is part of the 18 acre North Kerr Industrial Park originally approved by the TRC committe in 1996. There is currently an abundant supply of Heavy Industrial Property available across the street in the North Kerr Industrial Park and in other areas along Blue Clay Road. The Staff recommends deriail of the request. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Mr. Barefoot an attorney for the petitioner presented the rezoning request. There was a significant discussion about drainage and about I-2 Heavy Industrial Uses. Several people from Ivywood and other surrounding subdivisions voiced their opposition to this request. The Planning. Board voted unanimously to recommend enai f the request. FUNDING SOURCE: n/a •. ATTACHMENTS: 20 ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: . F . ,, ~ ~~% . - /~~ . ~ r~EJM'Y COM I I ~ APPROVED ~,,~F . .._ ~ REJECTED - .R,.;~ REMOVED C) POSTPONED t] HEARiJ :' ~G '~~ ,., r f ~i3~p~Ji CASE: Z-712, 08/00; APPLICANT: David Barefoot for TF Holdings Ltd. REQUEST: ~ R-20 Residential to I-2 Industrial ACREAGE: 8.55 Acres LOCATION: 3001 Blue Clay Road on the west side, north of the N. Kerr Intersection. LAND CLASS: The subject property is on the border of the "Urban Transition" and the "Resource Protection" land classification as identified by the 1999 Comprehensive Plan. : ~ - Resource Protection -The purpose of the Resource Protection class is to provide for the preservation and protection of important natural, historic, scenic, wildlife • and recreational resources. The Resource Protection class has been developed•in recognition.of the fact that New Hanover County, one of the ~ ' most urbanized counties in the State, still contains. numerous areas of . environmental or'cultural sensitivity which merit protection from urban land uses.... The class also includes land in the:Castle Hayne area where ~ . . the protection of Farm Land, a rural lifestyle, and the aquifer system are • highly important issues. Generally residential densities greater than 2.5 ' units/acre shall not be,permitted .... - •, PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 8/3/00: • Mr. Barefoot an attorney for the petitioner presented the rezoning request. There was a significant.discussion about drainage and about I-2 Heavy Industrial Uses. Several people from . the Ivywood-Runnymeade Developments and other surrounding subdivisions voiced their o osition to the industrial use l t d i th i b k d h . pp s oca e n e r ac yar . T e Planriing Board urianimously voted to recommend denial of the request. , - - ~ . STAFF SUMMARY:. - The petitioner is requesting a rezoning from R-20 Residential to I-2 Heavy Industrial. As noted above according to the Comprehensive Plan the subject property falls on the border of itivo • _ different land classifications. Although there is a pocket of I-2 Heavy Industrial adjacent and south of the subject property the zoning along the west side of this section of Blue Clay Road is _ . primarily R-20 Residential. The pocket of I-2 heavy industrial zoriing to the south is a result.of existing uses that were classified as Industrial of the time of the original zoning in 1974. ' Wrightsboro Acres, the subdivision to the west of the subject property was platted in the early 1960's. There is an existing road stub from.Long Leaf Drive into the subject property, The ,. property to the east and across Blue Clay Road is zoned I-2 Heavy Industrial. Much of this .property across Blue Clay is part of the 18 acre North Kerr Industrial Park originally approved by the TRC committee in 1996 and then revised- and re-approved in 199$. The North Kerr Industrial Park has had mixed success and continues to be~developed slowly. - ; Although the subject property is adjacent to some Industrial zoning, the property is well . :. screened from the adjacent use. Currently there is an abundant supply of Heavy Industrial ,; :. Property available across the street in the North Kerr Industrial Park and in other areas along Blue ~ ~ . Clay Road. Much of~theft}pro~~rty~i~t~hi~s~aris'zoned R-20 and classified as Resource Protection ~` because of the resence of t h g t bl Th ' ' p , a h w~a~ ~r~ i ~a~ ~e~~ e property s location adjacent to the Wrightsboro A S bdi i i e - .. cres u v s on also mak s rezoning to Heavy Industrial less desirable. For all of these reasons Staff feels that this pro ert should em~ `ri i esid n i l h f ~ p y r a e t .a , t ere ore, Staff recommends denial of the request: ~,~ ~~1I~~~ fd •: . r 124 ~~~~~ ~ .~ ' . . ~ . ~ ~. c SEP-26-00 11:04 FROM:.DAVID BAREFOOT ID:9107627677 PAGE 1/1 DAVID C. BAREIr00T ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW L•I.f;S TEMPLE BUILDING' 259 NoaTx FaflNr Sra~r • PoR UFF7CE BOX 1766 W[I.LitNGTON~ NOIITN CARUL[NA Z$4O2 - {910) 762A255 FAX (9l0) 7ti288'T7 • September 26,2000 VlA TELEFAX 341-4556 and U.S. Mail: Mr. Dexter L Hayes New Hanover County Planning Director, 414 Chestnut Street, Suite 404 .Wilmington, N. C. 28401-4027 Re: David C. Barefoot Application for TF Holdings Limited Partnership Rezoning R-20 Residential to I-2 Industrial - 8.55 t acres 3001 81ue Clay Road, West side, North of N. Kerr.[ntersection ~-712, 8/00 Dear Dexter: Pursuant to our conversation yesterday, this is to confirm that we wish to continue .our zoning request to the November 13, 2000, meeting of Commissioners. By copy of this ' letter i am requesting that Lucy Harrell reschedule the above matter as indicated. The reasons we discussed are: 1. We wish to change our request from I-2 to I-1 in response to concerns expressed at the planning commission hearing. We trust that would be more acceptable to the neighborhood. (We have also considered the possibility of changing to a conditional use 'district but since we don`t have anything definite on the horizin, that would be our last choice). 2 Drainage: The neighbors also expressed concerns about the drainage. We have been investigating that issue and hope to develop a drainage plan that will have a.favorable impact on the neighborhood but will need more time to study this issue, 3. Title Problem. We have discovered a slight title problem with part of the property within. the Trask families. We expect to have it corrected within -the week including the • joinder of the another Trask member. . ' if you. have any questions or need any additional information please do not has-irate to give - me a call. I would appreciate a copy of your report and a copy of the agenda when available. ` Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Sincerely, I:. David C. aref of Cc: TF Haldin s Limited Partnershi g p ~ ~~ Ms. Lucy Harrell Many days, on the news and in the newspaper, valid concerns are ex ressed about p poor planning and mismanaged growth in New Hanover County. I come before you tonight asking that a new precedence be set; that careful consideration be, given t.o this re-zoning request, and that in at least this ;..~ instance; rapid county growth and haphazard-development will be held in check. ~ .- The Wrightsboro.Community,-while expanding, has primarily been a quiet suburb, mixing historic family .roots well with first-time home buyers dreaming of~ra•ising their families ... • safely, and partially buffered from•the negatives of our sprawling city. '.. . ~.. To rezone this tract ;;of, farmland, (currently R-20) , - to allow the encroachment of heavy .industry threatens the very• heart. of .our .community. As ,I ..understand it, , a ~ • - , rezoning to`heavy industry would,allow a vast array of .. .. ,+. - ,," " ` : " 'business possibilities, all unacceptable as;next-door ,. ,. ..; . .neighbors • ~, , - ,!. . ~'.~'~ Our concerns focus on every aspect .of ,our quality ,of life .`~ • F .The recently updated 'intersection, of Kerr Ave. ;and.'„Blue Clay,.. `" ' Road cannot tolerate an increase in commercial traffic. The • • .<. ` ~~.,~ subdivisions of Runneymeade, Ivy Wood, OaY, Bend, and . ' ~. .. ~ ' .. ~ "~J k ` ~ ~ 12 8 ., . " _. .. .,. •~; " , N. sections of Holland-Drive are already overwhelmed with runoff ~• from common Summer showers, making roads impassable, and couldn't ` begin to absorb the water from an additional paved and .covered eight acres. While county water has long been discussed, many effected residents depend on individual wells for drinking and. bathing; no heavy industry can. guarantee our water's sanitation as its wastes and bi-products flow into our unusually high water table to the already polluted-Cape:. Fear River. Nor do we wish to welcome heavy equipment, . noisy machinery, bright lighting, or airborne pollutants, . .all commonly associated with industry operations which-also have the likely potential for around-the-clock business. This property is within a stone's throw of current dwellings on Holland Drive. There are four churches, an 0 timist club p and ballfield, and one public school all within one mile. In the giant puzzle that is New Hanover County, consideration of this rezoning is a piece that has no . logical, humane fit, and we ask that the line be drawn...that .. this type of undesirable development be stopped here:` Protect ` . our property values and current, valued way~of life.' Please, use foresight, and common good sense. judgement and deny big business unwelcome, unnecessary access to our residential M neighborhood. Thank-You. _ . ,~ 129 . July 31, 2000 1: We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road; Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina Petition against and Protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We wisli.to raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. Name Address : ~ ,. , . ~ .Zip Phone 1 2 ~r ~~~ ~~~~9 7~~=o~r~r .. 3 -~ . X40 C~ruii~sel~cstds ~: _. ~! ~ 3~a - go 8"~ 6 ~' e 3 a Ce .~P~.e ~ ' - a~ y l7 ~ ~ ys° z -- ~0 3~ 8 ~ 0 4.:, .~: .,. ,~ ~, ~ ~ ~, ~ - ~ i ~ t, 1oC~•„ .~ ~ .... ,',_~ ~ (~~?.~ ~?. t1~.~..:.::~ ~ $ y ~. ~ '~ ~ l .. a ~.: r'~ 11 Ur ~~ ~ .: ~~ .~~/ ~ r~rX ft. r~-.~_t c...`~~:. L'.r~'- cx~~'.. f f~ ~7 ~' .~ r ~i `'_ y 12 . ~~~- ~'t'~-- ~Gi/'~:~...._ / f ~ .:+<, f i~l a~`~~--~ ~ ~-a c~ c~ %`-l. G. ,.~ . t~' 9 ~ c~ZG S jl ~4, 14 ~ ~s. ~ . , r'^ , • .. - / ,r L l7 ' ~ ~`' - ca D r ~ 0 ~5 16 ~ ~ r `J . ~~ ~" ~d~~a , 17 ,; .. . 19 ~., ~z4~ 3 r G ~ ~ z 20 ~ , ~ ~: ~a . u: ~ `~ .~ _ ~ ~ ~= ~ Tar ~ o Q 3 2 ~ ~' ~ ~. alb ~~ ~"~~ ° ~, ~ ~~ 2 ,. 3 ~ ,~~ . ~: t. ~~ z .. ,, ~. ~ - ~ _ - - l S )' 1 i ' _ - fy~l' 1. -" - .. .. ... .. ,. ' . July 31, 2000 . _, . We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina M Petition against and protest Rezoning our neighbor hood to Industrial. We wish to raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. ~. .. . .' Name ~ - . , -_ Address ~ , ~ . ZiP - .Phone .# . ~ ~ fo ~ ~ 2~ ~ X75- ~' 7~ . 2~ U f a ~~~~?~ ~ aa~~- d 6 ~~"~~~' 3 - i-7 G 4 6 . ~ ~ .~a ~ ~a`~~~~, ~~~ fig' ~~~~. ~ 3-~ .. - ' ~ ~.1..~ _ ~ ~ ,~~ ~8 ~a.g ~ 7 5 - ~ ?~ 7 . e . 9 ~ ~.~s~- ~ . ~ ~ 0 ~ 8 /1'I ~,u.~-)`Gum, ~ ~ ~~ (,~ ~ ~ / ~D , 10 '.rte, ~ ~ ~ Z.~ ~ ~~P ~,,~.t;~.~ ~ 2& ~o t _. ~- 7 , 7 ~ 2 ~- ~ 2 ~ _ .12 ~~ f~t t r , Y ~ G'cI ~ <i~ 2i ''~ ~. S ° f ~-'~ . 13 . s~sc ~rzE w~/Z l ~~ f ~ . ~~ . . ;; ,.. - ~. 16 ' ~-~- a~~s~l.~ 8~~. :. . 17 ; .... C ~ ~,r,,,.. .~ U ~v L C~, u Y~ ~ T~,- . ~ ~yu~ ~ , : ~ ~P ~ - . .2 n ~19 . _ 20 . • • 21 ,,. ~-.., . 22 .. .. 24 '. ; . 2S - - - _ ;; - _ ~, - :, - - - ,` ~/ _ - -I July 31, 2000 ` We the neighbors of BIue CIay Road;~Wilmingto~ri and CastleHayne, North Ca~roIina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial.. We wish to " raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. ~ ` Name Address - ` :"Zip Phone # 1. ~ _~ ~ a. J $ ~ _ p=~. .. 3 , 5 ~ ~ .. , . .,. ~ ~~ . J ~ .6 . . z ~ __ C . ( 7 ; ~s- ~~ ~ 2 ~~~ l .~ .. . .,. .,. --~--~- t ~'' ! o~. ~ ~ .; - ~ ~--, Vii. . 7 ~ ~ ~' 3 .o . , ___~1-C `. ~ Gam/ ~ ~ ~~/" o~ f~ ~w .. / ~: qq '`~~~ ~ r-- .,' ,~~ 11, ~Jp~ ~~y pp 12 J z~l ~,'~ _ _ .. ~,~ r ~.. 13 ' r ~;. , {~ (J 14 .. J _ 1 ~i ~_ ~. ., ,t,~,~ C ;;, .;l ~, Q -.:. ~ ,l~Cs,~ G~t/C./ '~ <. ,. -; ~. Z~ ~~ ~ ,d .: 17 :, . u~g - ~ ~{ 20 ~ 36oi ; ova ~~~-. ~ ~ ~ `~~ ~ r. a5.( ~ ~! c~ ..~ . 2Y . _ . ,a ;. _. .. ,. .. `; 22 ,. .z ,. 23 ~.7 24 ~ : :,1 _ ~ . - ,. ,. - -1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ July 31, 20D0 We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina ;petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We «;ish to raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. Name Address _ Zip Phone # 1. 2 3 J 41 5 6 7 =~~ ~5~ St July 31, 2000 -We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We wish to' raise our children in anon-industrial. atmosphere. ~ ` Name Address Zip Phone # 1. ~ ,- ~,~~. ~ o ~ ~ j 4 n ~~ ~a~ . + ~ ~ (-- a 3Zo r.~ 2 0 3 6 ~ 7 ~ ~ Z Lo,,. . ?~ ~.,~ 2 8 ~-t o ~ . ~ L-t 1 - ~ 1 s• .~ g ~.. ~~i/ ,~rz~ ~ ~ ~ ~-- i .: 3~z - 7 9 - . «„ ~- ~i : ~a o , 1 ~ ~~~~'1'.P~f~ .•.. ... n ~ , a2~// _ .. ,, .11 ~~~ i . ~D~ ~ ~ /~ ~~O j' ~~ ~' 3 .~''~ ,12 j ~~loZ '- s~`~ 13 ~ ~,~~~ ~~. ~. ~~~ °.1`~.~ ~. ~~ .. 14 32 ~ ; ~ ~~' ~~ ~fo3 ~ cf r.. 7/~ a 15 - .. .._ . .: , 17 r ~~-- ~~ ~ 8 ~3 ... ~.~~~-tea ~ s __. _ _ y ~-o ~ ~ ~ / -~ ~' 2 .. . . .. 21 7: . ~i1 a~ ~ ~~:.~ ,::~.: n ~/ . 22 d.J ~ /:, ,. ' ~/~ ~a ~~ Q ~ (~ ~ ~ 23 1 ,~. ~.. _..: f,.. .. . le 1 ~ - I JS ~ ) }~q. ~ l3 V t ~ r' ; "suj • y it` .., r. .. ., ~. July 31, 2000 _ , . ~ , VVe the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, .Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North .Carolina etiti agai t a d t t R i u i hb h d a ns p on n pro es ezon ng o r ne g oo or to Industri l. . We wish to raise our children in anon=industrial atmosphere: ~ ` 4 . .:~ Name ,; •~' Address ~ ZiP ~ _. Phone # 2 ` fog ° ~SW9n~e~ 3. z a~ ~k ~ C~• 028 sly 9 ~ ~ ~ ~° - /~ ~ 3 ~, 4 5 - 6 ,. ` _ ~ _ ~. 8 10 ... • 12 -,13 ~. ., ., . .14 ,. ._; - ,15 16 ,. 17 18 , , . . ° 19 . . . 20 22 23 24 . ., .. . .... ; 25 ° ,.. , .- _ . - ~. -., . , , i -. ,. - _ ~ - -- t, ,_~ ,_ - July 31; 2000 VVe the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial.; a:We wish to ~~ raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere.: Name • Address Zip ~ 'Phone #. 1: ~a11Loh a~ 3.zcx~ SI( C~. ..,, 2~~fZy. ~' ? t t ~ C.~-. 2 ~,zq 1. G-.~ il- ~X ~ ,4 ~, .3 ~. 0 5 S tit .` .~- " 1 9 ~A 5 ~/~~ ~~C~-L .. ~l~ ~1~ ~, ~`~` ,~b~`~l ~/ /~ }. 6 AYE( li~~ l'1 ~~^f~ll7 .~/ ~/I ///~~, /rfn/(D/( \ / (/ /1 /~ c~oa. 3~ ~ ~ C~o2 ~t 6 7s = )~S z-3 ~~' ~~~ 7~~ ` -~.~GL~ July 31:, 2000 We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North. Carolina petitionagainst and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to, ~Industrial.,;We wish to raise our children~in a non-industrial atmosphere. ~ ., ~. Name. ,: ` Address ~ _" . ~ Zip -. Phone # 1. ~z.o ~ ~. ~ ~Z~ ~ Co ~ ~~ . 2 ~_ ~ G E 3 4 x 5 7 _ .. .. .:.. .,.._ ,.., r .. .. .. 8 ., -;. ,. _' ~ r^ 9 . ~.., . ..... - . .. _ y . ,.. ,r ~ ,. ,~ 10 . .. ,.. - t ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~: . 11 ~ , ,- 12 .. ~ k ~- .. , . - ' ., ,. .. ~ , ' 13 ,. ; . .. . 14 ,. ~ -. , ... :, ,., , .. 15 : . ~... .~ _ ,. ~ . ~, , 5 .. 16 ,. '~. `. ` >~ . ~ ' .. _ . 17 ., _ .. , . - .~ ~~ . ~ , . pp ,. O ., ~-:, ~ ~ .. ., ,, p.,,..q~ a.:. ~ t r e. •~ ^E t, ' -19 , .,, s.. , .,y ~ . . ..- .. , 7 . .. ~ . ~. 21 _. , ~ ~ J ,' 22 ,. .. .. ,: ,. , 23 . .~ . :. _ . - , j ~ . .. - - . w :: .. : . ~,m 24 . ~-~ ~. , . ~. :~ , ':.:. k - tf ., .i, . y„ ~. . , r `` `' E ~? July 31, 2000 We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We wish to i aise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere: ` Name ~ Address Zip Phone # ,,,.. July 31, 2000 We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We wish to raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. 'Name Address ~ :Zip Phone # 2 S y ~2 ~ .6.~5 = g~s~~ 3 ~ ~. 4 3300 ~- ~.~/~~ - . . 5 1, , 6 :. , 7 , 8 ~ , 9 , 10 ~ ~, , 11 ~ ~ `. 12 << 13 ~ ~ ~ 14 _ .. 15 _ . . ... .:: ~, 16 ~ _. ; . , 17 ~ .~ ~18~ - .. . ~~ ~ ~ ~. ,.i r .,~ ~~-, lg - - ~ `, , 22 - ',, , ,,: .: , 23 ~ ,> ~- July 31, 2000 We the neighbors of Blue Clay Road, Wilmington and Castle Hayne, North Carolina petition against and protest Rezoning our neighborhood to Industrial. We wish to . - ,raise our children in anon-industrial atmosphere. . Name..• Address `. Zip ~ Phone # ~G s ~ ~~ )/ 1 U „ ~, ~ o / ~z -~`~ Z ~ ~ ~ z- Z - - ~~ ` ~ (' ~ ~ - ~-~~ < -~fz oa- J . ~ _l, , v 8 ~ ~~~,~- ~_ ~~ C1t~~ ~'~ 1(}---, ~ 11 v~-1-'Gfr ; 13 14 i6 17~ 18 19 ~ ~ 2~ ~ 2-- ~ ~l~ ~~ 8 ~, ~ ~ 03 0 : ~lt~c- . ~ '~t~ X7-0 , C~C~ ~u~ C~ :: : - 2~ Z. . ~.7~ ~ D~ a . ~ ~ ,. ~ ,; '~ ~~-c~ '~ l~P ~ ~ ( 7v --0 3 0 {This page intentionally left blank} .. __ .. .: .. ... h- .. . . t ; _ ,., .. is - ., ~'; , ... , ~ ~~ .. ~. :. ~ ...~. ~- ~ ~ - ~~ ~ - i .~ ~ ~~ `~p. ~ t . - , ~~ . a.,,. a .. i _ .. 'ra ,' ~ ,, ~_ {. _ _~ . , ~ p , . . ~~ ~ » 1.... ~ _ ~ ~,~, , 14 2 ~ ;,l4 . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~~ .t ~ . .. ,,.,L .. ~ ~ ~ . , s 1 .. ...t ~ r NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF~ COMMISSIONERS • REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 11.3 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter:. Dexter Hayes - . Contact: Baird Stewart • SUBJECT: ' S-329, 03/91, 04/00 (revised); Applicant University of North Carolina at Wilmington - BRIEF SUMMARY: - This item was tabled by the Board so adjoining residents and petitioner could meet to discuss ways to mitigate the noise levels emitted by the heating and cooling units atop the research facility.. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Ina 4.0 vote ,the Planning Board recommended approval of the petitioners' revised special use application and site plan design. The Planning Board also recommended that every effort be made ~: to mitigate the noise pollution to adjoining residential property and adhere to the County's Noise . Regulations. Several residents who live nearby voiced concern about the noise coming from the heating /cooling system and suggested that the revised application not be approved until the . issue has been resolved. FUNDING SOURCE: ~ ,., ATTACHMENTS: ! - { ?~ .. ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW .~ •. •. .. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: .. . ~ ,~,,~`` r COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: C AUNTY COMM~ON~ _ ,. ~ . ~iPPROVED L, - .. REJECTED Cl REMOVED ® . • POSTPONED I~ FdEAR[J ~r~~r . ~~ ~ ~ ~_ 143 . ~ Wt;b d; ~ ~cc~:.~'u~. ~.trnki ~. ~; I ~ ~;. .~ "C~-e-v v~n~ P~ ~~5,~ frti~t~i~ ~ ~M~r-~,, SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5-329, 03/91, 04/00 (R.evised); Applicant: Univ. North Carolina at Wilmington Type Use.: Marine Research & Educational Facility Location:5000 Block Masonboro Loop~Road, East Side County Commissioner Recommendation (May S, 2000 Meeting) • This item was "tabled" by the Board so adjoining residents and petitioner could meet to discuss ways to mitigate the noise evels emitted by the heating and cooling units atop the research facility. : :: ~. , .. • Planning Board Recommendation (April 6, 2000 Meeting) ; • Ina 4-0 vote, the Planning Board recommended approval of. the petitioner's revised special •' use application and site plan design. The Planning Board also recommended that every . effort be made to mitigate the noise pollution to adjoining residential property-and adhere to the County's Noise Regulations. Several residents ivho live nearby voiced concern about t ;, the noise coming from the heating/cooling system and suggested that the revised , application not be approved until the issue has been resolved. • • ~ ~• MarineResearch Facility History _ ~~° • • - ., . The University of North Carolina at Wilmington received a special use permit fora Marine , Research and Educational Facilit b the Board of Count Commissioners m A 'ril 1991. At Y Y Y p that • ~• time, the site plan consisted of 18,125 cumlative square feet of construction.~Specifically, a three: '. ~':~ • ~ . . ,winged building (7,500 square feet), an ocean support building (5,625 squareMeet), a shellfish sanitation building (2,500 square feet), and meteorology building (2,500 square feet). A copy•of '~ the original special use permit is attached. - ~ ~' ~~". . ~. -... .. ._ ~. • Construction°on the project is almost complete. During construction~of the facility, significant 4i ~~, 5f~fi ~h k Cflj ~'s~i~ 'iii ' ~~ ~~~ ~ . modifications were made prompting a revision to the original special use permit issued ' . 1S3?~i ~Q,.i~~lf`. Modifications from the original plan include the following. 144 - y` ~ ~~ :~. ,~~ • - ~ ,. ,r, • •. S-329 (04/00) 3, 3. The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property or. that the use is a public necessity. A. Land adjacent and north of the facility is vacant. The property is now or formally~owned'by } '`..STATE-~OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER ~. ,, ORDER GRANTING A..,,SPECIAL USE~PERMIT • - ;' . Marine Research and Education Facilities The County' Commissioners fbr New Hanover County ~havzng held a public hearing on-April 1, 1991 to consider application number S-.:~29, 3/91 submitted by, the.- University„ .of.-'North :Carolina at Wilmington, a request for, a Special Use fPermit~,to use .the, property located on the, east side of Masonboro Loop~Road, and having heard all ~•the -evidence and 'arguments 'presented 'at the hearing, makes .the following FINDINGS OF FACT and draws the'' following CONCLUSIONS.: ~• , : 1. The County Commissioners FIND. as a FACT .that a].l of the;. ,,.,. specific requirements set -:.forth" 'in 'Sec'tion 72 of ~ ahe County,. .Zoning Ordinance will .be satisfied if the property ~ is ;developed in accordance" with the plans ' ' submitted ~ -to •'"- the '~ County Commissioners. -;; , _ ,~ r ., 2. ~It is the County ''Commissioners' ~ CONCLUSION ;rthat :. the,, , proposed use does satisfy . the• first general ,requirement :Listed ,.in ~ ' ` the Ordinance; namely. that ,the use wi11~ not 'materi`ally y.endange?-:..` the public health or ' safety if located where ~px'oposed a;,and .developed according to +the ~~plan~ 'as' submitted ~`~.,ria.' approvec~~. `` .In support of this conclusion, .,the Commissioners mGke 'the' follo~aing'~ .. , .. ..FINDINGS OF. FACT ,, ~ ; ~ ~ ~ .._ .: } . ~ _ ._ • A. Mini mal-.site clearing is proposed and .the ,p`roportion ;of , -;°~ paving for :dives :~~a`nd~ of :heG•i'*"buildings to';ttie `~overal:i • ,. . ~ ~, .. . tract acreage is .every low. - ~ ,, . a.. ~ ~~„ ,,, , .-, w. ~~ a .• ~, ~ B. Water and se~•rer services are li=kely to~be ,providedw-from ;: - ,, off-site sources:' ;Sewer may. be ,supplemented ~by ~n *, _` ~ on-site treatment plant if ~necessary.~~~:` °~ : t ,: ' . C. This site has dlrect_,access•to Masonb~oro~~~oo~ P.oad.`'` ,`` ~' ,~.. . • , .. ~: . .: . ~ , ,. ,, , .A .: , . ~ a ~~ .. - D. -~- .This site is'; loca-~ed within `.th;e ~ P~yrtle Grove '~vrD~ ,- :,~, . . District ^~ . : 3. It is the County. Commissioners' :`;COtiCLUSION that :the '~~ -proposed use does satisfy ~,th~ ~~-second general ~r~eau? reme~it ~ fisted in the Ordinance; namely+';:`Lhat the ,:use :'meets' all" ;recruited °r conditions and s ecifications ~ In su ort'_of :.,this'' conclusion`,' P PP `'the •'Coirimzssioners'make the :'fol~owing FINDINGS Or .,;FACT. _ A.. The proposed~.'Marine~ Research and Education Facile'`- ; . ,, will be operated by „the University o.f r+orth',Garol~na "a.t ' Wilington s ;Center.' for.' Marine Science R . Colle es I Unlvez'sities and related .uses _ar ~ esearch`. '" ~~~~ ~ g e ~~p~ermi~ttea~~~,~ ~, by Special Use Permit in the R-15 Residential`'District: ,,., -, "~ , ~~ , . , . ,, , b.B.- Approximately 18,125 cumulative: square feet of - construction (buildings) is. proposed. This would consist of a three-.winged main building (7, 500 square _ feet), an ocean support building (5,625, square. feet) a . ` shellfisYi sanitation building (2, 500 square feet) and.. a - ~. - meteorology building (2,500 square feet)., • ` `~, C. An area of street parking is indicated on the site plan. - around the main building {Bldg. a). The number` of - ~ ~ spaces is not specified . No parking areas are shown ' around. buildings C,. D,° and E. More detailed parking. and landscaping plans wi13•be needed. ' ... , 4. It~ is the County Commissioners.' .CONCLUSION that the - proposed use does satisfy the third general requirement listed in . ::: ~- the~Ordinance; namely that the, use-will, not substantially injure • the value 'of adjoining or abutting. property, or that the use is a public necessity. In support af. ..this: conclusion, „the: ' ,~ ~ .` Commissioners make the following FINDINGS OF.FACT: ` ;.. °: A. :Land bordering on :the north is vacant.; This ~1and is ., ., :. oa•rned by the N . C . Lutheran Retirement ~ Center . Land ~ to . _ .. _ . = ~ the south is either vacant -ors developed at a very low.- residential density. Further ,south i s ~. large tract.: .' ` ' that is used .for residential purposes and the ,growth ,. . end sale of Christmas 'trees . i ~. '~ ~: ~ ~ ~ B. Significant residential development ?s located to- the. ... " ~~ west across Masonbora Loop Road. . - ~ ~ , ,"-, ' - 5. It pis the County 'Commissioners' ::~ CONCLUSIONthat .the -'_S ~ proposed..use daes satisfy the fourth.: general requirement ~. 'listed ~, . o in the Ordinance; -namely .,that the location "arid ~.character~'-of the ..- ; .. -.. ~ r use if developed according to the plan. ash subriit ted ~ and approved, , . ,` -will. be :in harmony with 'the area in which~it.is to be located-sand ,~ in general •.-conformity with the ..plan ~ _of development . far ; ,New . ,, - r ~ .Hanover. Count "~ ". y,. Tn support of this conclusion, the Commissioners - ,. .- ., - ~ make ~ the following FINDINGS OF .FACT : ~ - - ,A. Thee proposed :development, ~~rould~~consist~ :o~ 18,000±~ ', square feet on-`fifty: acres,. . .-. -. ,. , - B. The -'site :plan :..indicates thatsignificant natural area :~ . - ~ ~ would- remain undisturbed " ,:: -_ ~ , ~~ 6 . Therefore, because ~;; the `.County . CoT.~<<issioners -conclude `' • that all of the -general and .specific -conditions precedent to the" issuance of . a SPECIAL USE 'PERMIT `.~ have ~ been` satisfied, IT . IS =ORDERED that the application ":for `.the issuance o= a SPECIAL :USE .; - .PERMIT be. GRANTED, subject -to'~the following co~id~ bons: .: ~ 'A. ~ -That .'the applicant ~~ shall : 'fully comply i•rith al~~~ the •' specific requirements stated ~ in' the ordinance _ for the -,,~ ~~' ,., t, ~. .. _ ,- a ., . _ -, ~r. _ .. , ~ ~ t ' proposed u'se, as wel~1.~ as any additional- conditions (` ~' ~ hereinafter stated. - ~ \ =~ B . If. any' ;'of the conditions ~ imposed by this special use . - • ' permit shahl be `held ~ nv'alid beyond'' the authority of this~••Board of Commissioners ~ by'~ a court of competent '~ jurisdiction then this permit shall become void and of . no effect.... - ~ ,, _ ° .. -. C. ' 'Other: ~ .. .. ' ~ 1. All.~otYier Federal,' State and- loco? locos applicable _ • . .. . 2. On-site signage be limited to one ground sign not- . to? exceed six feet .i n ~he~ight and '32 square 'feet in . ~ .. _ .. area .. ~ - .. • - r. , .. ~. . . . _ '~ ~ -3. .Setbacks mandated ~'yfor ~: O-Iuses 'as specified in • ., _ . Section 69-=11 be "'applied: ~,_,.. .. ,. ,. .. ., ,: . .. . r ..: .., ,. .. .., . . ,. . Ordered`th.s -1st day'- of ~Apzi~l,~ 1991:' '' ~~:~~~~, , , ` ~ 7 . .. .,,. ~ .' .. m ,. - , _, ~' SFr d Retchin, ~ C airma - Attest. :w .. .< - . _ .. ,, .. . ... :. .. ,• j. ~; ~~ -. ;. ,, _ ~ ,, Jerk to the Eoard x ~ : ~ t i ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _ ~. . - ~ .- _ i - .. - „„ ., . ,.. . , :~ ;. -. .... - ~, t . . ., . . y ate. '.~ ,. _. ~, . ~ .. .-r ' ~ ~i ~ - ~ ~, .. - . . , .. .. , ~ .. ., , - ~ , , .. ~..~ - „ 4 .. . -, . ~;, v i ~: _ .u M1' _ .. , - _. {, ,. t' ~ y '. ~ .. ~- .. ~ . _ . ..., 1.50 ~.~~ r :1 ` ~ t ~ . _. ~ .. <<- ,. _. ,' ,.. .. 1 - ' ,. .. -,: ~ .r.:. ,:. .. - - i. .. _ 1 ~~, . 4 ; , .{ . ,, _ "THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON , ,. ~ .. SOUND- ATTENUATION EFFORTS AT CENTER FOR MARINE SCIENCE " AT ' .. ,, . • MYRTLE GROVE . •,. ~ Several months ago UNCW began responding to concernsxegarding HVAC noise ~ . .' levels at the new IJNCW Center for Marine Science, and committed to developing a plan ' - to reduce those. levels: In a letter of January. 28, 2000, LTNCW. informed neighbors of the - ' , ' Center that problems had been confirmed in the #2 cooling'tower. After initial start-up, it '~ ~' was determined that the fan was not operating within specifications. Modifications were • made in consultation with the manufacturer consisting of fan blade and shroud ' replacement in addition to analysis and adjustment of other moving parts.to ensure - . - operation at a minimum noise level so as to be in compliance with the. County Noise Ordinance. In a letter of February 18, 2000, UNCW informed. neighbors of the . 'impending visit of a professional acoustical'engilieering consultant to aid in exploring ~" options for reducing noise levels even further. Again, at the New Hanover County '' ' ~ Planning Board meeting on~April 16 2000,:UNCW committed to doing everything. ; ~ . necessary. to reduce what was by that time an already much lower noise. level. This. is to' provide you with an update on actions we have taken and an implementation plari, which - , r ~ .will further reduce noise levels which ryas also communicated to the neighbors in writing " `, ,: `.. ~-~ : on May 3, 2000. = - ~ - .. .. ~ . r {. - _ After an intensive investigation of the situation by acoustical engineers, LJNCW" contracted with Commonwealth Kinetics of Richrriond, Virginia,'a nationally recognized ~. ~ ~ ..vibration and noise control. specialist, to ;design and install anoise-suppression system, ?which'will result in a significant additional reduction'n the noise level. Design, manufacture and installation of the~bafflin ' . ". '' ~ g system-will require tip to 90 days. Design ; ; .. ': ", work began the last week of April; fabrication of the various. components will cortimence :. -- .~ - about the firsf of June; acid installation will occur from the end of June to the end of Jilly _~~ _y ~' :.: By August 1, we should have a frilly operational system which the designer guarantees to ~ `` ~~ ' ~ ~ ~` provide a significant reduction in noise le~~els through all octave ranges. .. _ .. . -. _ Q .. e an - We appreciate your undegstandin~ dunng the time it has taken to formulat .., R acceptable solution to a very complicated technical issue. The university. is committed to ~: _ .. working to bring satisfactory closure to this matter. ~:: '~ ~ ~', ~ , ,, ,. _ .. .. ~ _, ,' r ~ - ~' ~ . ~ 151 ,~ , . . ,,. ._ . - ~~ -~ .: - --- `. ~ '" `' : " 601 SOUTH COI;LEGE ROAD • WILMINGTON; NORTH CAROLINA 28403-3297. ~' a .. .; _., , _, ,. _ . r. ..~I~ THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON MEMORANDUM ~ ~{ ~ , NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACT10N Meeting Date: 11/13/00 ` CASE: A-303,10/00 ~ Applicant: Smith Properties of Wilmington, LLC REQUEST: Zoning Text Amendment for the Table of Permitted~Uses ~ ~ C The applicant would like to amend the Table of Permitted Uses to permit Commercially Operated Indoor & Outdoor Recreation Establishments in the A-I Airport Industrial Zoning ; District. This amendment could be accomplished by adding a "P" in the appropriate column of the permitted use table. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10%5/00: The,petitioner presented his proposed text amendment. No one spoke in opposition, .. haweverahe.Planning Board agreed, that certain uses might not be"appropriate-near the ~" airport and should be reviewed as_aspecial use permit. The Planning Board unanimously:.: ~, voted to recommend approval of the amendment as recommended by Staff. " .. STAFF SUMMARY , :. . ,; ., .. ... .. ..~ -New Hanover County~adopted the Airport Zoning Districts in October 1976. The use for "Indoor &"OutdoorRecreation.Establishments =Commercially Operated;" was not added to the • zoning ordinarice until February.1983. The objective`_of the Airport districts is to limit the potential ~' ` concentration of people around the airport: However; there are perinitfed uses within~the airport ~ `` ' : . districts that tend to attract large concenfrations of people on a temporary and intermittent basis. There are also several uses within the~A`I district~that are only permitted by Special Use Permit. Because not' .'~ all Indoor and Outdoor Recreational~uses are compatible with the airport and because some locations surrounding the airport are. inherently higher risk than others; staff recomm'erids that~Commercally , `. ~~ operated Indoor& Outdoor Recreataori Establishments should only be permitted byrSpecialtUsek .' .: ... ,. ,. d Perrrittin the A-I District. ' 4 ~` " "" .. . _ .. .. , ., r. ti .~ k E " ?,; E r ~ r + . __. ,~ ~ -. ~. k { F r. ~ m ~ .. f:' " Petitioner awns a tract of land. (the "Property") whose address is .2927 North Kerr Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina. The tax parcel rnunber of the property is RO3400-008-032-002. The property is located on 'the south side of N. Kerr Avenue an the part of. N. Kerr that runs east/west to the north of the New Hanauer County. International Airport. Please -find attached a survey map of the Property and a copy of the relevant portion of the New Hanover County zoning map,, on which the Property is highlighted.- The' Property 'is located within the Airport/Ts~du.strial zoning district. The lands surrounding the Property to the east and south are all zoned Airport/Residential. The Table of Permitted Uses of the New Hanover County Zoning -".Ordinance .,does not presently permit commercially operated "Indoor & Outdoor Recreation Establishments" .within the Airport/Industrial District. The Petitioner believes that this use should be a permitted. S ,. use within the ,Airport/Industrial District for the following reasons: ~1. The Table Of Permitted Uses For The A-I And A-R . ~ Zoning Districts -Are .Presently Inconsistent With - . ~ ~ "The Stated Purposes Of Both Airport Districts. It has been pointed out above that car~rcially operated Indoor & Outdoor Recreation Establishments are not allowed iri the A-I zoning district, ~ but are ,allowed in the A-R district with a special use permit. Allowing this use in the ~_A=R district and disallowing it in the A-I district is inconsistentwith the stated purposes of airport zoning "~ Let us look first at the stated purposes .of the .A-R .zoning ~. ` ~ district. Section 59.2-1 of the zoning ordinance (A-R) states that: . _ , '"rt ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ..the specific intent of this Section is: to minimize aircraft hazards by excessive density;" ;. `.'(emphasis added). - • ~ ~ 155 . .. The ordinance continues by stating .that another specific intent of the A-R district is: `"to prohibit the developirent of places of assembler such as schools, hospitals, rest hares or other • uses which tend to concentrate large rnmibers of people;" (emphasis added). It is clear fran this language that one of the principal purposes of A-R zoning is to limit the potential concentration of people around an airport.. ~ . Presently, the A-R district allows: (1) Membership Sports & .Recreation :Clubs' (with, special use permit); (2) Parks: & Recreation Areas, (3) Libraries, (4) Churches, and (5) hcdges, Fraternal & - Social Organizations. These types. of uses, and especially churches, are, by' definition, places of assembly which (with or without a special use permit) DO "tend to concentrate large ~ nLmibers of people", and which DO carry. the potential for excessive•density,. ,These uses, are clearly inconsistent with the cabjectve of reducing or limiting .population .density.. .A church can .potentially have .`a congregation of hundreds, and. inntunerable amounts of people. can assemble in a parka If these potentially high-density uses ;are permitted in the A-R district, they should not be~ excluded fran the A-I district. 'The uses described above,-.which are permitted in A-R, allay fora " potentially larger.assembly of -people than would a cam~ercially operated Indoor & Outdoor Recreation Establishment.-;- ,., -. Let us now look at :the stated purposes,; of the A-I zoning district. Section 59.3-1 of the zoning ordinance states that it is the specific intent (of this district) '' . . ., ; ,, , c;"~, _. 1 .. ., ... " . to encourage the -types of develo~xnea.~t having _ ~ . maxim~n caTpatibility with aircraft operations; , ,- thereby protecting the lives ;and property , ~ . of the users of the airport . "and.. of , • the ~ occupants of ; . . . . - , . the vicinity _ ~~ • . ~ In so .many words, control of population, density alsoappears to be one of .the -primary .:purposes `; of the 'A-I zone :` , However, ' , as with . A-R, we see that several .high-density uses .are permitted in A-I, while others are not. Under the Table of Permitted ~'Uses,.~ the follgwing high-density uses are allayed . in ~. A-I as , of right.: (1) 'Eating ~ ~;' & Drinking Places.,. ~(2) `Hotels- & Motels, .(3) Resort Hotel/Motel, and `"` of course (4) Churches. `. .We .have the same inconsistency here ,with A-I as with .A-R, in that high-density uses are allowed ir1.A-I contrary with the ordinance's stated purpose. Like A-R, -the high-.density ,uses 156 ~~ fi ., ~ ~~~ ,, ;~- . ~ "~_ .. . , listed -above that :are allowed in A-I accam~cdate a potentially greater - concentration of people than would an Indoor & Outdoor Recreation Establishment. A Resort Hotel/Motel .would very likely contain a ~ .. greater and n~re permanent concentration of people at -any given time than a :recreation establishment. Hav is it ..that the permitted 'high-density uses in A-I are .car~patible with aircraft operations, ' -'while uses with less density are not ?: - Finally, the roost striking inconsistency, -and what is most disturbing :about the -present distinction between the ~ uses allowed .in the. A-R and A-I districts; is that high-density uses are :- . •permitted in A-R, .,which (in this case) lies physically closer o the , . airport, where- the potential for hazard is greater, ,but are denied " in- he A-I district which is farther away fran the airport, and ' less hazardous. .. ~" ~. ` 2. Allaaing The Requested Use In The A-R District, . It. In 'The A-I District ..Appears - ~. ~ ~ But Disallaving , ,- ` Arbitrary . :. ~ . ~. . , -• Fran the discussion in 1.~ above,: it is .plain :that saw .~~ - high-density 'uses are permitted •:in the airport zoning districts ~ ~. while 'others. are not- - irrespective of the density that hose ;::~ `uses can allow. It. appears arbitrary to a11av. Eating & Drinking. .-, Places,, Hotels/Motels and Resort Hotel/Motel in the A-,I zone;. yet . exclude Recreation Establishments. -`It .is even ii~re arbitrary, and .' - puzzling, to allay Recreation 'Establishments by specials use in A-R °(which ~ is a ,,RESID~'t~`~`jAf ," , zone) , yet totally deny it in . A-I, . ... -. :. which is a "NON-RESIDEtQI'IAL" .zone ! :; It is yet . ire arbitrary to . :allow a "private" Membership-.:Sports & Recreation Club a a matter of right = in " the . A-R , zee, but ; car~pletely ;deny equivalent "cazmercial ~~ ~ ~ establishments in the A-I zone . ~ " ~ :, The most puzzling aspect of .this ' issue, ,however,' is that °Churches", 'which 'can potentially accoarr~date .~ - hundreds of ' ..people; `are allowed in EVERY zoning district;` including . I . , ~' ~` :the airport zones where safety ,is supposed to be of parat~uzit concern, and ,industrial zones ,.where the .threat of nuisance is greatest. Is the ,, ' , zoning ..- ordir~arice ,saying that ; -the ;safety of a church congregation is . . _. , ' .less ~ irc~ortant than the safety.-; ;.of guests at a Resort Hotel/Motel; - ~ or the participants at a Recreatianal:,Establishment ? . .. ;: , . ... ,, .. 4 - ` , . -. -,- , -_. r . ^- .., - ~ ,. , . , .. ... .. ., s ,. ~ . - . `-, / 3 . ~ 'Allaying The Requested Use - Iri The `~ A-I `District With 'A Special Use .Or Conditional Use ~Permit~ Would Not Interfere with ,Aircraft 'Operations . _ ~ - Limiting 'population density` -in airport zones is not the ar~l.y purpose of A-I zoning: As was quoted above, ~ -another stated purpose is to pranote develzt that has "caipatibility with aircraft operations". A Resort .Hotel/Motel is no more ca~npatible with aircraft -operations than a ccxm~rci.ally ' ~ operated . recreational establishm~izt . Of~ course, ~ the height of -such afacility-"can be ' la:mited so as not'to interfere with the airport.. ~ 'But hcav does that 'address the •, density question ? :, . , ..- . .. .. ~ . '' ~ Petitioner .believes- that a~•~text amer~dmcnt should be made to permit cc~nr~ercially operated Indoor & .Outdoor Recreation Establishments-yin the A-I zone, not only because the `- uses c~zrrently permitted in airport zones are inconsistent, but also because such use can be restricted by ,requiring a special use or canditignal use permit to ensure that any given .`facility is co;~atible .with the functcm and operation of the airport and .aircraft. ~' 'T'his has ' 'al-ready~~' .been ;proven ao be workable by ~ -reason ' ^ of thi s ~ use ` ~ being allowed ~ wtYi ' a .special use permit in the A-R .zone: Section 59.3 '°`already~ contains the ' mecYianismsnecessary ..for controlling height, size, lighting,; radio si.gi~als, and visual hazards, so as. to allay the use yet not interfere with .: , . air tra.ffic.'~ ..;. ~,._ ... ,. - ., ,, - .. . . ~ ry .. - . ~. rv ~ -. , .. .~. In addition; as an example ~~ ''in Petitioner' s ~ case, Petitioner's - property , 'ales -' within the 'airport's fla_gYit circle 'as shown' ~on `the .. 'attached ', fAirport ` :Height ~Zoplp ~ ~ ';'.but is not ~~ "in ;lane with 'the , g ' I"~P, run-ways, ""thus. will not' interfere with take-offs and landings: = A special or ,. condi.tional~ '.use permit `'for recreational ~'establishrnentswithin `A-I .could ~'be : ;conditioned ' on the.' location of :";the property relative to the 'airport, `the'`physical characteristics`of any proposed buildings;'arid the - ,projected' : ':ntur~ber of persons" e~eceational es ablshments~(~t on an average .,basis,' ;.`etc. `Ahaying ~' and Even . . other _izses) in' ' A-I with' spe' cial or~ cond~.tional"use, applying'"definite, ,. ; .., , acrA-rra; nah~ P µcn,; cl~l'; nPS ° . wcxild ~: provide ~ ~ a .much"more rational connection ; . , . , a w p. Y ., ~ ~. M f ^ , ' - `"~._ I N NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ` REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 11.5 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes Contact: Baird Stewart SUBJECT: . A-304, 10/00 Applicant: Staff; Zoning Text Amendment to add a definition for Wholesale Nurseries and Green Houses BRIEF SUMMARY: At the September, 2000 Planning Board Meeting there were discussion. about wholesale florists and nurseries operating on residential property throughout the County. The Planning Board's concern at the September meeting was that many of these operations in the County were not producing the products on site, but were importing the stock and distributing it to retailers. Therefore, Staff was asked to prepare a text amendment to define Wholesale Nurseries and Greenhouses. See attachment. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Staff presented the proposed Text Amendment. No one spoke in opposition. After some discussion concerning wholesaling and the existing exception for agricultural uses, the Planning Board unanimously voted to recommend approval of the amendment with some minor wording changes: FUNDING SrrJURCE: n/a ATTACHMENTS: 2 - ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS• COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: r~aunrrY: co~Mi~©r~~?: APPROVED [~:-:~-~~- REJECTED .REMOVED CL 4; . POSTPONED. D FiEARi7 CASE: A-304,10/00 Applicant: Staff REQUEST: Zoning Text Amendment to add a definition for Wholesale Nurseries and Greenhouses PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10/5/00: ' Staff .presented the proposed Text Amendment. No one spoke in opposition. After some discussion concerning wholesaling and the existing exception for agricultural uses, the.. Planning Board unanimously voted.to recommend approval of the amendmedt with some ' minor wording changes. STAFF SUMMARY ~ ~ , At the September, 2000 Planning Board Meeting there was a discussion about wholesale florists and nurseries operating on residential property throughout the County. Horticultural specialties including beddinb plants, flowers, fruits, and greenhouses for floral products are classified as agricultural uses: By law agricultural iises cannot be regulated, therefore, wholesale nurseries and greenhouses are permitted uses in all zoning districts in the County. The agricultural classification only applies to "establishments primarily engaged in the production of ornamental plants and other ~ nursery products, such as bulbs, florists greens, flowers, shrubbery, ... These~products maybe grown under cover (greenhouses, frame, cloth house, lath house) or outdoors." The Planning Board's concern at the September meeting was that many of these operations in the County were not producing the products on site but were importing the stock and distributing it to retailers. Therefore, Staff was asked to prepare a text amendment to define Wholesale Nurseries and Greenhouses. Staff proposes the following Text Amendment: In the permitted use table, staff proposes to drop the word "Wholesale" from the Nurseries and Greenhouses use, and recommends adding a definition for Nurseries and Greenhouses. Nurseries and Greenhouses: are establishments primarily engaged iri tlie.production and sale of ornamental plants and other nursery products, such as bulbs, florists' greens, flowers, shrubbery, flower and vegetable seeds.and plants, and sod. These products may be grown under cover (greenhouses, frame, cloth house, lath house) or outdoors. Using this proposed language the Nurseries and Greenhouses would be permitted in all zoning districts. Wholesale nurseries and greenhouses would be classified under the wholesaling:use in the _ permitted use table and would be permitted in the I-1, I-2, A-I; and PD zoning districts. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Regular Item #: 11.6 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes 'Contact: Baird Stewart SUBJECT: UP-10, 10/00 Wilmington, New Hanover County, CAMA, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for policy 4:8. BRIEF SUMMARY: Recently there have been several Special Use Permit Requests for Community Boating Facilities in New Hanover County. Each of these request have brought about testimony from a variety of professionals. The testimony centers on conflicting interpretations of policies 4.8 and 4.9. As result of this confusion, County Staff was directed to propose an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that would help clarify the policy for the development of marinas: See attachment. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff presented the proposed amendment. One person spoke in favor of the amendment. The Planning Board unanimously voted to approve the amendment. FUNDING SOURCE: n/a ATTACHMENTS: 6 ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: ~~ ~ ~r~oulvTV coM~l~sloly~ APPROVED ^ REJECTED ^ REMOVED ^ POSTPONED 1~~-~c.~~t~,i. 1111 ,. HEAR) ~~a~ ..~~_`3~~~~`~63 - ~. CASE: LUP-10,10/00 REQUEST: Wilmington, New Hanover County, CAMA, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for policy 4.8: The proposed amendment°is noted in Boldface Italics: 4.8 Allow the development of marinas, dry stack storage, and moorings as a means of providing public access to the extent that their,development shall not adversely effect estuarine resources or public trust waters. • Commercia6 marinas shall not be allowed in Primary Nursery Areas (PNA), Outstanding • Resource Waters (ORW), or open Shellfishing Waters (SA). • Moorings and mooring fields shall not be allowed where they may have an adverse effect on navigation channels. • Pumpout facilities shall be required for existing Commercial marinas which have boats- . containing enclosed heads. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION 10/5/00: ~ _ Staff presented the proposed amendment. One person spoke in favor of the amendment. The Planning Board unanimously voted to approve the amendment. STAFF SUMMARY: Recently there have been several Special .Use Permit Requests for Community Boating facilities in New Hanover County. Each of these requests has brought about testimony from a variety of professionals. ' The testimony centers on conflicting interpretations of the definition of marinas acid conflicting interpretations of policies 4.8 and 4.9. As a result of this confusion, County Staff was directed to propose an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that would help clarify the policy for the development of marinas. Staff recommends the modification to policy 4.8 shown above. This proposed change will help to • clarify the policy difference between Community Boating facilities and Commercial Marinas. Both types of , - marinas will require a special use permit from The County with a finding of no adverse effects on estuarine '. resources or public trust waters. Commercial marinas would not be allowed in Primary Nursery Areas, Outstanding Resource Waters, or Shellfishing Waters. ~ - Existing Comprehensive Plan Definitions: • Marina -includes commercial marinas, rental slips, community boating facilities, and '' ' ' residential piers renting more than two slips. Commercial Marina -any dock or basin and associated structures commercially providing permanent or temporary harboring or storing of two or ' ~~~"~ more boats, pleasure or commercial, and providing marine services, including • ~ `~ but not limited to retail sales for fuel, repair, convenient food stuffs, boats,. , . , ,.~.~. ~~ engines, and accessory equipment. • .Community Boating Facility - a private non-profit boating facility including a . dock, pier, and/or launching ramp on property which has water frontage, the use • ~~@$~~y ~~~o~~ Which is intended to serve 5 or more residential lots or units. The right to use ~ ;~ . ~ ~~~~~~i~~~facility must be conferred by an easement appurtenant to the residential lot ~ ,..: • tt ~s intended to serve. No commercial activities of any kind shall be allowed ®~~withtn the confines of the facility. ' ~I?~'2Dt~,A~l&~ - ~ ~ 31.~}~i?,'~~1VIooring -any means to attach a ship, boat, vessel or other water craft to a .,, ~y~stationary underwater device, buoy, buoyed anchor, or freestanding piling. ~ ` 164 ~~ ~~ ~~~ . . .. ~~: . • DEXTER L HAVES Planning Director 1~1-~W I~~.I~T®VER C®~JI~TY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 414 CHESTNUT STREET, SUITE 304 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401-4027 TELEPHONE (910) 341-7165 FAX (910) 341-4556 October 18, 2000 Mr. Alex Marks Division of Coastal Management DENR ' 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 SUBJECT: • • Amendment to the Wilmington-New.Hanover County Comprehensive Plan and CAMA Land Use Plan Update Dear Mr. Marks: ' In response to your letter of 16 October 2000 and pursuant to our phone conversation yesterday, I am sending you the Staff Summary of the proposed amendment to Policy 4.8 of the Wilmington-New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan and CAMA Land Use Plan Update. During our conversation on Tuesday you also indicated that you need a statement about the general consistency of the proposed , amendment specifically as it relates to policy 3.7 of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan in that estuarine resources will be protected by consolidating riparian access and no commercial activities will be permitted in Primary Nursery areas (PNA), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or open Shellfishing Waters (SA). ' The County will continue to require a special use permit for both Commercial marinas and Community . Boating facilities with a finding of no adverse effects on estuarine resources or public trust waters. Therefore, with respect to policy 3.7 the cumulative and secondary impacts of land use and development, and the limited carrying capacity of our coastal ecosystems will be considered through the special use • ;permit process in all •land use decisions concerning the development of marinas. Also attached to this letter is the notice for the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners public hearing that was published in the Star-News on October 12, 2000. As soon as we receive certification from the Star News we will provide the certified copy of the advertisement. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Dexter Hayes, Planning Director or me at . 341-7165: Sincerely, .. ,. - - Baird Stewart ~ ~~ _ Senior Planner encl. , 165 - ' - I ' 6D .WILMINGTON MORNING STAR / T'HUFZSDAY, OCTOBER 12 2000 ~f r i 166 113- Business • :Personals . -Free ..~ ' Your c+d may quality to ruri Tree if 1Ymeets the lolbwing criteria: • Ade must be placed by,call- ing our Ctass~ied Tetemar- ' keting'deparlmsnL • . Tha price of 5200, or less is • stated for each item, and total :, for all items in the ad does " not exceed 5300.' (tt furniture groupings are t6 be sold as a set Items rrt3y not tie priced separatey.' . ' t Each 8em and the number of - items is fisted and priced.' ' It Is anon-commercial item listed 'under: .Automotive, ' Furniture, Appliances, Mis- ` "ceilaneous, Merchandise. • '+! :~~ ., . , 145- Legal Nofices :: ':I C Construction Co., Inc. will ba bid- ding the New Hanover County Judi-' Dial Building Expansion, at Wil- mington. North Carolina ae a Multi Prime Contractor. This project hide on Tuesday, October 17, 2000 'at 2:00 P.M. in Wilmington, North Cara- lino. C Construction Co.,' Inc, ie eo= ficiting bids Irom any and e0 quell- tied Subcontractore and Suppliers, BA, SBE, WBE, Large Enterprises, sic. subcontractore grid ~Suppl'tere who era inlerasted In bidding this project wn contaC, C Construction ' Co., Inc. at P.O. Boz ;8270, ,Ty1ar,' Texas 75711 at 9031597.1500 qr FAX 903!597-0567. C Construction. Ca.,' Inc. la an Equal Opportunity and Af- tirmativeAclionEmpbyac -,;::;;"1;; NOTICE OF. PUBUC HEAA1Na ~'"' New Hanover County. - Commissioners~ , November f3.2000 The New Hanover County Board o1 County Commiseignera'wip hold e public hearng on Monday, Novsnr„ ber 13, 2000 begmning at 7:00 p.m.. in the Old County Courthouse, southeast-corner of Princess and Third Streets, Third Floor, wlming- ton, NC to consider the tolbwing Comprehensive Plan amendnv~nl:-,,!: , COMPREHENSIVE PLAtJ AMEND-.; I MENT: Request to emsnd.tha Wil-., mington-New Hanover^:`County''! CAMA Land Use Plan by'modilying ( ` poli~ q.8 to clari!y the potty br the doveopment of marinas. (LUP•10," 10100) ?rS•; ~ , Inlormafion on the above'dem.may' ' be viewed or Inquires made .by contacting the County planning De• . partment (3G 1.7165), 414 ,Chestntif`. ~ ~ - Street, Wilmington, NC. NI'inter=~ ' ested citizens are invited to attend. '•~. - B. A SlaviaR~ ~ `. ` Senior Planher • ,'~i. .. - `~. Dexter Hayes 10/25/2000 09:31 AM To: girardotd@uncwil.edu, smithgage@mindspring.com, wmjconlogue@juno.com, Chris O'keefe/NHC@NHC, Grant Gore/NHC@NHC, Wanda Coston/NHC@NHC, Sam Burgess/NHC@NHC, Kelly Clark/NHC@NHC, . Baird Stewart/NHC@NHC, Bert Hatchell/NHC@NHC ----- Forwarded by Robert Bowen/NHC on 10/24/00 12:22 PM ----- "Mac Currie" To: <rbowen@co.new-hanover.nc.us> <mcurrin@wans.net> cc: 10/24/00 12:19 PM . Subject: please forward to County Planning Board • TO: :New Hanover County Planning Board .FROM: Mac Currie 801 Westwood Drive ' Raleigh, NC 27607 RE: Proposed change in New Hanover Co. Land Use- Plan to exempt community boating facilities in Primary Nursery Areas DATE: October 24, 2000 I am writing to urge you not to support the proposed change in your Land Use Pla'~ ~~ disallows community boating facilities in our state's Primary Nursery Areas. Normally, I would not choose to comment on any county's planning process other than my county of residence. In this case, however, the action you are considering will affect the Public Trust Resources of our state. These resources belong to ALL the citizens of~ North Carolina and I therefore feel that the .proposal is much more far reacFiiig than New Hanover County and has the real possibility to do irreparable harm to our state's Public Trust Resources. As a fisheries biologist, I am horrified that you would consider degrading important Primary Nursery Areas by changing your regulations to allow community boating facilities. Over 90% of our recreational and commercial fisheries spend some time in our estuaries. Many of the important species are estuarine-dependent and spend over one year in nursery areas in our sounds. Primary and Secondary Nursery Areas have been identified as most critical to the .success of these finfish and shellfish and have been protected for over 20 years. To allow development, especially to increase the mooring of boats with accompanying ~' fuel spills and leakage, is unconscionable when we are struggling to ,maintain .and.in , many cases to enhance the dwindling fish stocks that we have. ' Please do not veer from the good existing policy that now recognizes the value of naturally functioning nursery areas. Keep our primary nursery areas as clean and protected as we can. Do not allow a change that will place community. ,boating facilities in Primary Nursery Areas. To do otherwise, represents an injustice to every North Carolinian. NEW HANOVER COUNTY .BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 ~ ~`~ '~ Regular Item #: 12 Estimated Time: Page Number: ~~~~ G Department: Sheriff Presenter: Contact: Fred Clingenpeel SUBJECT: . Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) from U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance-FY 2000 BRIEF SUMMARY: Based upon Uniform Crime.Report (UCR) Part 1 (Violent) Crimes (per capita), New Hanover County has been awarded $61,935 from the Bureau of Justice Assistance for FY 2000. The funding will be used to purchase law enforcement equipment. The match for the grant ($6,882) is in the Sheriff's Department 2000.01 budget. The grant requires a public hearing beheld for discussion of the use of-funds: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hold public hearing. After closing public .hearing, recommend acceptance of the grant requiring signature by the County Manager. Request approval of associated budget amendment #01.0062 FUNDING SOURCE: Federal$61,935 County $ 6,882 C~ ~~~~ 1.~,~4~~+' ATTACHMENTS: ,~ ba01-062.w REVIEWED BY: . LEGAL: Approve FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMM TS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Hold public hearing. Recom pproval of acceptance of grant and approval of budget amendment #01.006 COMMISSIONERS' ACTT S/ MENTS: ~, '~ r i ;~inn,e~,i~a ~'w~~~.~~~ COMMI~I ~ ~ ~~,,, ;~,-APPROVED fw 1 -r Oz~~'i f,T~;~:~REJECTED p ~~ ~~r f~~~IREMOVED p ~~~ - ~~ POSTPONED !D ~ , 'NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION ' Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Budget Amendment DEPARTMENT:. Sheriff's Dept:/LLEBG Grant BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-0062 • ~ ADJUSTMENT '- ~ DEBIT .' CREDIT LLEBG Grant-Sheriffs Dept.. • $61,935 , Transfer from General Fund (Sheriff) ~ $6,882 , Capital Outlay $68,817 4 . Sheriff's Dept-Supplies 1 . _ , _ . ~ _ _ $6,882 , Sheriff's Dept-Transfer to LLEBG _ ~ $6,882 • _ EXPLANATION: To budget LLEBG grant awarded to Sheriff's Dept.. • . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: :. APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by .Board Of Commissioners • ;r _ .: a, r •_ .. ~ . 6.OUNTY r,OMM- I~ON1 APPROVED ~Y ~,..~,~,~°~~~~ua l~Ud~~REJECTED ^ ~'43'~~REMOVED L7 ~ ~. . ~ ~~~~~~POSTPONED ^ 17;0 ~~~M~ ~• ~~ ~ ~IEAR7 ~~) ~',J ~ _ ~~ • MEETING OF THE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT ASSEMBLY ROOM, NEW HANOVER COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE 24 NORTH THIRD STREET, ROOM 301 WILMINGTON, NC November 13, 2000 ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Non-Agenda Items (limit three minutes) 2. Approval of Minutes ADJOURN i• PAGE NO. 171 173 {This page. intentionally left blank} `l NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Water & Sewer Item #: Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Governing Body Presenter: Lucie F. Harrell Contact: Lucie F. Harrell . SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes -Water and Sewer District BRIEF SUMMARY: Approval of minutes of Regular Meeting, October 16, 2000. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTfONS: Approve minutes as presented. FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW .COUNTY MANAGER'S CO TS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' AC S/COMMENTS: {This page intentionally left blank} CONSENT AGENDA "NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS November 13, 2000 ITEMS OF BUSINESS PAGE NO. 1. Approval of Minutes ~ 177 2. Approval of Resolution to Release State Funds Allocated to Council of Governments 179 3. Approval of Sale of 6.38 Acres of Land to DOT for Smith Creek Parkway and 183: Approval of Associated Budget Amendment #01-0065 4. Approval of Revision of Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funds 191 5. Approval of Upgrade for Financial, Budget, and Human Resources Systems as a 197 Sole Source procurement and Approval of Amendment to Software Licensing Agreement with American Management Systems (AMS), Contract #01-0171. 6. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Chief Project Engineer to Sign Permit 199 Applications 7. Approval of Patent Agreement for WASTEC's Carbon Injection System 201 8'. Approval of Grant Application to the NC Department of Pollution Prevention _ 207 and Environmental Assistance Entitled "Drywall Recycling Project" 9. Approval of Appointment of Scott McLendon, US Army Corps of Engineers, 213 to the Tidal Creeks Watershed Management Advisory Board X10. Adoption of Resolution requesting NCDOT to Add Roads in Emerald Chase ~ 219 and Willowbrook Subdivisions to the State Highway System 11. Acceptance and Budgeting of $50,000 provided through Contract to the Health 223 Department from The New Hanover County Partnership for Children (Smart Start) Through a Grant from The Cape Fear Memorial Foundation to Fund Two Health . ` Department Maternity Outreach .Workers and Approval of Associated BA #O 1-0070 . 12. Acceptance and Approval of $12,400 from New Hanover County Schools for a New 239 Half-Time Registered Nurse to be Hired by New Hanover County Health Department and Approval of Associated BA #O l -0071. 13. Adoption of Resolution -DOT Drainage System Impacting the Futch Creek Watershed 255 14. Approval of Disposal of Surplus Equipment and Vehicles at County Auction to 261 be Held December 2, 2000 . Approval of Budget Amendments: 15.1 #2001-13 Controlled Substance Tax ~ 275 15.2 #01-0061 to Budget Anticipated FEIVIA revenue for FY 00-01 17~ _ 15.3 #01-0066 Social Services/New Hanover County Hurricane Floyd Relief 277 15.4 #01-0067 Public Health/School HealtYr 278 176 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION. . Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 1 Estimated Time: .Page Number: Department: Governing Body Presenter: Lucie F. Harrell Contact: Lucie F. Harrell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approval of the following sets of minutes Regular Meeting, October 16, 2000 Joint Meeting with City Council, October 9, 2000 , Joint Meeting with Airlie Gardens Foundation Board, September 12, 2000 Closed Sessions RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve sets of minutes as presented. FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: _ ~ ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW I• ~ ~t?UNTY COMMISSION APPROVED.. ~"~ REJECTED D REMOVED Q POSTPONED CJ HEARf~ L ~;~~~'~` . I r r3r6e __= 4~ -~ -~ 177 {This page intentionally left blank} P~ ,: ; e. ~. ,. ~,fI~31Py~`~? «~ ~ . ., . ~~~~ ~~~~&~~ . ~~ ~~d~~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 2 Estimated Time: Page Number: . Department: County Manager Presenter: . - Contact: Allen O'Neal, County Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution to Release State Funds Allocated to Council of Governments BRIEF SUMMARY: The State funds to be allocated to Cape Fear Council of Governments requires your approval of the resolution. To fail to approve the resolution will result in funds reverting to the State General Fund and used elsewhere in the state. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve Resolution FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW . 000NTY MANAGER'S C ENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve Resolution. ~ . COMMISSIONERS' A TI COMMENTS: 8 RESOLUTION. BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY WHEREAS, in North Carolina the Council of Governments (CO.Gs), or Lead Regional Organizations, as designated by the NC General Assembly, serve both municipal and County Government, and have established productive working relationships with the cities and counties across the state; and ~VI~REAS, yin 2000 the NC General Assembly 'recognized these existing. working. ., . relationships and the continuing need of local governments for assistance and support through the appropriation of $990,000 to help. each of the eighteen COGS assist local government with activities as deemed appropriate by their area local. governments; and WHEREAS, these funds are stipulated by the NC General Assembly as not intended to, be used for payment of member dues or assessments to COGs and will not .supplant- - or replace funds designated for the COG by the member governments; and WHEREAS, in the event that this resolution is not passed by the local government by June 30, 2001, for release of a portion of these funds to our COG, the available funds will revert to the State's General Fund; and _ _ t WHEREAS, in Region O, funds in he amount of $55,000 will-.be used to provide technical assistance to local government; ~ - .4 _ . NOW THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of.County Commissioners of New Hanover County requests the release of its share of these funds, in the amount of $13,898.83, to the Cape Fear Council of Governments at the earliest , possible time in accordance with the provisions of State Law. Witnessed this the- day of Signed: Attest: Chairman ~ . Clerk ~~~~`~~"" ~ !1_w ~~~~~ ~ (SEAL) ~ ~~ ~~~~~1 . ~ ~i~t7~~~ - ~ ~~~~ 180 Serving Local Government in: CAPE FEAR COUNCII, OF GOVERNMENTS Brunswick County Bald Head Island Belville Boiling Spring Lakes. Bolivia Calabash Carolnia Shores xola~n Beam Leland Navassa Northwest Oak Island Ocean Isle Beads Sandy Creek Sliallotte Southport St. James Sunset Beach Columbus County Bolton Brunswick Cerro Gordo Chadboum it Bluff . accamaw Sandyfield Tabor City Whiteville NC~V Hanover County Carolina Beach Kure Beach Wilmington Wrightsville Beach Ponder County .Atkinson Burgaw Surf City October 20, 2000 Member Governments of the Cape Fear Council of Governments Enclosed is the annual resolution to release the state funds allocated to COG. As you are aware, there is no cost associated with the resolution. Your approval only rele4ases the state funds to the COG. However, failure to approve the resolution will result in those funds reverting to the State General rand, where they will be. used elsewhere in the state. I think you would agree that would not be in the region's best interest. If you have any questions about the resolution, or if I need to be present at the meeting, please call. There are a lot of exciting things in the works that will directly benefit your community. We are hoping to get a GIS capability for mapping and land use planning. Additional staff are being considered to assist the smaller governments .- -with planning and zoning, as well as other types of technical assistance. I hope each of you know how much we appreciate your support for regional cooperation. Together we will partner for a better tomorrow. Sincerelyy, //L~~~%!\,f f'hr;c N1ay(J,, irPrtOr Cape Fear C~G Encl. (1) Annual Resolution of Support `) ' GOOD PROGRESS T H R O U G H ~ AERATION F,; ~ ~ F E ~irc ~'~~~..8 Vr~~~ ~®o 1480 Harbour Drive,,Wilmington, NC 28401 ; (910) 395-4553. (910) 395-2684 Fax www.capefearcog.org 181 NEW HANOVER COUNTY. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 3 Estimated Time: Page Number: .Department: County Manager Presenter: Contact: Andy Atkinson, Kemp Burpeau SUBJECT: Sale of 6.38 Acres of Land to DOT for Smith Creek Parkway BRIEF SUMMARY: As part of the Smith Creek Parkway project, the DOT needs to acquire a tract of land owned by the County of 6.38 acres adjoining Smith Creek. Improvements on the parcel include a private sewage treatment facility owned by Philip Investments, placed on the County property pursuant to an easement granted in the 1950's. The' DOT payment in the amount of $330,400 is to be divided, with $193,850 to Philip Investments and $136,550 to New Hanover County. The payment is based on an appraisal by Robert Cantwell. Closing will occur shortly. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIANS: Authorize the County to execute warranty deed to DOT. FUNDING SOURCE: See Attached Budget Amendment number 010065 • ATTACHMENTS: BA #01-0065. REVIEWED BY: . LEGAL: Approve . FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COfi~ NTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTT S/COMMENTS: I ~OCIn1TY COlUIM1~10 APPROVED REJECTED 0 4 REMOVED POSTPONED L7 i HEARia ~ Oo`~ ;~ .~~~ -~-!~C ~~.- ~ ~ -18;3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Budget Amendment DEPARTMENT: Finance/County Commissioners/Non-Departmental BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-0065 ADJUSTMENT DEBIT Finance: Sale of Fixed Assets $136,550 County Commissioners: Appropriated Fund Balance - Non-Departmental: Contracted Services CREDIT $29,599 ' . ' $106,951 - EXPLANATION: To budget $136,550 as the County's portion of the proceeds from the~sale of 6.38. ~ ' acres of land needed for Smith Creek Parkway by the NC Department of Transportation.. ,,: -,,..~: -~ Of this amount, $106,951 will be budgeted to pay incentive fees due to Randall Funding and Development for grants secured in excess of $1 million as follows: (1) Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grant, incentive fee of $17,055; (2) the HHS SAMHSA Coalition for Prevention grant, incentive fee of $ 39,896; and (3) the VA Homeless Providers grant, incentive fee . of $50,000. The remaining $29,599 will be budgeted to reduce the amount of fund balance ;~., «~,,~ appropriated. - ... .. .. ,, NOTE: Good Shepherd Ministries and the County are discussing the possibility of Good Shepherd providing a portion of the incentive fee for the Homeless Providers grant. If this occurs,' the County's incentive fee payment will be reduced. . ADDITIONAL IN RMATIO~N ~~'fo~da'te fund balance has been appropriated m the amount of ~ . $3,532,116. Of this amou t, $3~?4$6~11r6~is due to funds being rolled over for projects not ~; . completed in FY 99-00. ~ ~~1~~~~1511 ~ ~ ' .. - ... I ~ Q~~b~k~7~~ ' If all budget amendments,~on,~th ~s~ag~e~da are approved, fund balance appropriated will increase by 18 /x$195,401 to $3;727,517. C~hangVesta~r~~s follows. ~ ; . /~ Tidal Creeks Water Quality Project (BA #2001-15) -Increase By $ 75,000 . Community Oriented Policing Services Grant (BA #01-0063) -Increase By $150,000 Sale of Land (BA #01-0065) -Decrease By $-29 599 APPROVAL STATUS: To be approved by Board Of Commissioners ~~ounn~ co~~iss~oN, APPROVED G-/~ 62EJECTED D 6iEMOVED (~ POSTPONED L3 HEARD ~ I ~ _ ~" ', _.l ____r__. RESOLUTION ' OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY WHEREAS, New Hanover County has possession of a number of items of personal property . which are surplus to its needs and desires to dispose of same; acid rrr-• nx~-~-' ~,''~~"ri,~ C'~r 'a ~'nr~ ~ WHEREAS;the"~~i~tems`lto~'b~disposed are listed and submitted as an attachment to this resolution; `-' ~~~'~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ aerpa~n,~~t NOW, THEREFORE; BE'I'TrtRESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners ofNew Hanover k'~ ~'+~~ [~~t~'r~.~, .E County that the Finance Directors designated representative pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 160A-270, is hereby authodriz~etd~to dispose of all of the personal property as listed for cash or check at an' aiictoii~arid 'that said representative be further authorized and directed to execute necessary docturients, transfer title, add items to or delete items from the auction list, and perform all necessary functions associated with this auction, to be held Saturday, December 2, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. at the Property Management Maintenance Facility, Division Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina. :Adopted this 13th day of November, 2000. (SEAL) r-, W. TA LM AGE JONES DAVID A. NASH WILLIAM O. J. LYNCH .JAMES B. SNOW, III WAYNE A. BOLLARD STACEY L. FULLER ROGUE, HILL, JONES, NASH & LYNCH, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 SOUTH THIRD STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28407 of counlsEL: October 10, 2000 CYRUS D. ROGUE, JR. WILLIAM L. HILL, II MAILING ADDRESS P. O. DRAWER 2178 WILMINGTON, NC 28402 TELEPHONE 910-763-4565 FACSIMILE 970-762-6687 Kemp Burpeau, Esq. .Assistant County Attorney ...New Hanover County 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington,. NC 28401 Dear Kemp: Concerning the 6.38 acres owned by the County and described on the attached "Summary Statement/Offer to Purchase Real Property" from the State of North Carolina, this will confirm that we have agreed on allocation of the $330,400 total purchase price as follows: 1. To my client, $193,850.00. 2 To New Hanover County, $136,550.00. The Department of Transportation has requested that we provide a letter confirming acceptance of the offer. Attached is a draft which, if satisfactory~to you, I will execute and forward to you for signature and delivery to DOT. With best regards, I am Very truly,yours, r ~, ..~~. William O. J. Lynch cc: Mr. John Philips WOJL/vms S~iWOJL~.PhdipSJohmL\Burpeau-ltr.wpd 187 W. TALMAGE JONES DAVID A., NASH WILLIAM O. J. LYNCH JAMES B. SNOW, III WAYNE A. BOLLARD STACEY L. FULLER HOGUE, HILL, JONES, NASH & LYNCH, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS A'r LAW 101 SOUTH THIRD STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 of coufVSEL: CYRUS D. HOGUE, JR. WILLIAM L. HILL, II • MAILING ADDRESS , P. O. DRAWER 2178 WILMINGTON, NC 28402' TELEPHONE 910-763-4565 FACSIMILE 910-762-6687 October 10, 2000 Mr. Hugh Thompson , Senior Right of Way Agent .North Carolina Department of Transportation 306 Division Drive Wilmington, NC 28401 Dear Hugh: ~ _ tl:,..~... ... With regard to the New Hanover County 6.38 acre tract upon which my client has a sewage treatment plant, this will acknowledge that my client and the County have agreed on an allocation of the State's offer of $330,400.00 and accept the State's offer on the following terms and conditions: 1. This is an advance acquisition as stated in your offer and will be closed with all dispatch. If not closed within a reasonable time, we reserve the right to withdraw ouracceptance of the offer.: _. ... : 2. My client will continue to operate the plant until customers being .served by the plant are connected to the,City of Wilmington's sewer system. The State will connect my client to the City~system at no charge to my client. 3. The State will take the property as is with the operator only being responsible for environmental contamination that occurs between closing and the date my client ceases operating the plant.` `~'" `~' . ~ • Kemp Burpeau, the Assistant County'Attorney for New Hanover County, is signing this letter to acknowledge the •County's acceptance of the State's offer. Please have the appropriate person from the State contact me about an ~ ' agreement concerning operation of the plant. This settlement has no bearing on 1 Q ~ the other condemnation action between the State and my client. f~ Very truly yours, . • • _ , . /,'~ William O. J. Lynch cc: Mr. John Philips • WOJL/vms S:IWOJUPhilipSJohn-L1Thompson•Itr.wpd New Hanover County Consent , CGL Kemp rpeau, As t. County. Attorney S I _ R ~ fiFi ~~ ' ~' r 1~ M V mC0 J It~~~ ~...* _ ~ ~(\ A ~QQ 1 - J p ~ ~ N tSl in 1 1.~ (p'6 lD d S' I n i' K x .A .. - n ,511 I O .. - .: .. _ ~ '- - 1c _ ,~1 1 taYY: p t c~~• ~ o .sluloll /,~•~ - / .~ aro i~on•ai .. -_ - '/_ pr• - - ;~I~ .r ~, Ij I .•~„ 1St ~ e ~ /~A-ov •I~.ec~~"'r ~ ~~-~~ .F = ~ ^.~..• Y-7 1 ~ Y ~~I~li ~ ~J ...~ ' t R ~ r'1 N--~ 1 t '~ . S~••`pp.._"1, 'l .•;-=_~ - _ - - - O ~ 1 I - *A5J ' V1 p \ 1 ~ r F I ~ `1 Ails y /.~- ---._~yl '"" f11 •8 ~ - -_r,._^. t ~~~ `1 _ - IlrirIrtY Y[DCAt LIL ~ ;';', \ L / G - I I:ly, 1. ... -_ O ", i ~ ~ -•~ ~' ~ f -I ~ - - - -. - - LAGJON CCY~IR PT.PN --• ~ --~-_ ~R t ~ ~ ~ I I~ /nDY. 1110 ~u(. I AN $Ry ~/tt _.-~ ~ I I r ~ - Rf .11. BCAip/M/)4PA1 I.- - - r ra lI~ -----__ ~A I I , " - 1 ~ J -----. ___, _~ ~ N r ~ F t\ I l 1 ~'• • I ?: u:n ~_ ~ ~ ~0 f ) "'aa mil` ~~ r ' I ~ ~ p- ~ F, e' 66•yh• ~~ t of ,ill -` 1 I _ _ __ ~-•= _ 1~~ ~(~ k ~1 ~g ii C- cz. . I ~ n .ati.O _ Y . I I \ , I "Project "No. 8.2250108 I ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ' Parcel No. 909A ~ ~ y ~ °~'~ ~~'"~~ • ~~,~~a Qom New Hanover County ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ' ~ ~~~c~,~p.. '..Taken 3.45 Ac. i ~ ~ ~ a~~ "~ ~~ ~~~. Remaining 2.93 Ac. >! ~ }S / " ' ~~~~ ~a. ~' I Total 6.3 8 Ac. •:2S ~ ~ /~'"•~ I s",~ .~~~' .. . ~~I ... ' ~ .: I '% ` o., a l{, l I i ?` N ~ g I ~~ gc~.. ~t, • . ~ • NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 4 Estimated Timer Page Number: . Department: County Manager Presenter: Contact: Andy Atkinson SUBJECT: Revision of Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funds BRIEF SUMMARY: At the JCPC meeting in October 2000, the Board authorized amending the funding to the Institute of Family Centered Services (IFCS). The JCPC had set aside $42,000 to cover implementing a. restitution program. Since the program has been instituted through the NHC Schools at very little cost, this $42,000 was available for redistribution. Due to lack of adequate fund's, the JCPC had . to cut back the funding to IFCS this fiscal year from $100,000 to $50,000. The JCPC desires to increase the funding to IFCS from the current $50,000 to $92,000. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• • Approve the increased funding,to the Institute for Family Centered Services by $42,00.0. This will increase the IFCS funding to $92,000. ' FUNDING SOURCE: \ NC Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. No county funds required. ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: ' LEGAL: N/A FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS_AN_D RECOMMENDATIONS: r~ I~ Approve recom ndation of the JCPC to increase the funding to the IFCS to $92,000 for this fiscal year , , COMMISSION RS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: j f~ : ~UrJ11( COMINt~iO -~ VED . APPRO REJECTED ~ '~ REtJiOVED ~ ~ ', . :. POSTPONED I~ ~ 1 ~J ~, , . OFFICE ®F JUVEl~IILE JITS'TICIE Progra>~ Agreement I2evisioan~ Name of Program Intensive Home Based Services Program ID# Sponsoring Agency FamliFirst, Inc New Han `Contact Person (Name & Address) c°""ry Jane Vermette, MSW 6336 Oleander Drive, Suite 2 Wilmington, NC 28403 Phone 910-799-4518 '. Services nx t':ttecnve Date O1-Jul-00 thru 30-Jun-O1 The Current Program Agreement is being revised in the following manner, o. V FamliFirst is re uestin an additional $42,000.00 from the JCPC. See Revised Bud et Narrative for details. The reasons forthe changes are as follows. FamliFirst's on final re uest was for $100,000.00 for Intensive Home-Based Services. We were awarded $50,000.00, drasticall reducin the number of families we could serve durin the Fiscal Year. With an .additional $42,000.00, we will be able to continue treatin the families we have in service now, as well as begin to take families that have been on our waiting list. Current Program Revenues New Program Revenues OJJ $50,000.00 ~ ' OJJ .. , $92,000.00 Local Match Local Match 10% 20% 30% cash 10% 20% 30% cash $10,000.00 In-Kind $18,400.00 OJJ-Formula ~ In-Kind ~ ... ~ • OJJ-Formula ' . ~ . o~ner . 192 _ =- .u .;-~ ~,,- 56500] ~, other TOTAL ~" ~ '- $60,000.00 TOTAL ~ .. , $110,400.00 ~ . ,~ ~; BUDGET INFORMATION FY 00-01 Number of Months I2 Revised 10/00 Cash I. Personnel Services, $ 80,652.00 120 Salaries & Wages $ 61,100.00 ` 180 Fringe Benefits $ 19 552.00 140 Professional Services II. Supplies & Materials $' 2,550.00 210 Household & Cleaning 220 Food & Provisions 230 Educational & Medical 240 Construction & Repair 250 Vehicle Supplies & Materials 260 Office Supplies & Materials $ 1,450.00 280 Heating and Utility Supplies 290 Other Supplies & Materials $ 1,100.00 III. Current Obligations & Services $ 6,848.00 310 Travel & Transportation $ 4,188.00 320 Communication $ 2,210.00 33 0 Utilitie ~ , s ~ $ 250.00 340 Printing & Binding 350 Repairs & Maintenance 370 Advertising ~ $ 200.00 380 Data Processing 390 Other Services IV. Fixed Charges & Other Expenses $ 1,950.00 410 Rental of Real Property $ 1,950.00 430 Equipment Rental _ 440 Services & Maint. Contracts ' ~ 450 Insurance & Bonding 490 Other Fixed Charges V. Capital Outlay ' $ , . ~ S I0 Office Furniture & Equipment 53.0 Educational Equipment 540 Motor Vehicle 550 Other Equipment 580 Buildings, Structures & Improv. Total $ 92,000.00 In-Kind $ 18,400.00 $ 18,400.00 ~ - $ 1,950.00 $ - $ 18,400.00 $ 110,400.00 193 FamiiFirst,InGNH-DJJ \ Total ~ 99,052.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 6,848.00 REVISED BUDGET NARRATIVE I. Personnel. 120 Salaries. One full time Family Service Coordinator at $19.00 per hour and 1 part time Family Service Coordinator at $19.00 per hour for approximately 1800 hours of professional service = $34,216.00. One Office Manager (processing applications, client reports and maintenance of client files) approximately 342 hours at $12.50/hour for 12 months = $4,275.00. ; One Project Coordinator providing direct management and coordination of grant requirements including client tracking sheets, monthly program reports,. monthly batch control reports, monthly financial breakdowns, etc., approximately 440 hours at $12.50/hour for 12 months = $5,500.00. One Regional Director.providing direct field supervision, indirect. supervision, direction of weekly team staffings, and 24 hour, on-call support, approximately. 687 hours (see In-kind Contributions for additionaLNme) at $24.00/hour for 12 months=$16,497.00. Corporate support serr~ces providing payroll processing, approximately 50 hours at $12.00/hour for 12 months=$612.00. _ • Total Salaries =$61,100.00 In-Kind Contributions. -- iFCS will contribute $5,130.00 for 15% of the Family Service Coordinator's direct contact with the client, based on 1800 hours (IS% of 1800 hours=270 hours x $19.00/hour=$5,130.00) for . administrative time such as progress note writing,'report writing. and case staffing time, IFCS will . also.contribute $9525.00 for 300 hours of supervision and on-call support from the State Director, at ' $31.75/hour, and $3745.00 for an additiona1156 hours of field supervision and on-call support from, the Regional Director, at $24.00/hour. ~ ' Total In-Kind Contributions =$.18,400.00 180 .Benefits. Include medical insurance, 401K contributions, workmen's compensatioti; paid leave time, social security, professional insurance, and- compensatory company taxes based oei.32% of salary totals = $19,552.00 . II. Supplies and Materials. 260/290- Office Supplies-and Materials/Other Supplies and Materials.' Based on 15%° of total costs for one year = $2550.00. (Approximately $17.00 per month per family, based on 12 families for 12 . ....months) III. Current Obliaations and Services. " • 310-Travel and Transportation. Consists only of a mileage cost reimbursement of .28 cents/mile paid to staff for travel to families' homes for counseling and• emergency interventions, transporting family ' members to crucial appointments, mileage costs to collateral appointments and program meetings, court hearings, etc. These are based on actual face-to-face contacts with approximately 12 families or collaterals for one year, averaging 103 miles per week per family totaling $4188.00. 320-Communication. Use of communication tools such as mobile telephones, postage and 15% of • telephone expenses for office fora "total of $2210.00, or approximately $184.00/month... • 330-Utilities. $250.00, or approximately $20.00 per month for a portion of office utilities. • 370-Advertising. $200.00 toward the cost of advertising space on the Wilmington• Directory Website, identifying FamliFirst, Inc. ~as a JCPC funded program. - IV. Fixed Charges and Expenses. • 410-Rental of Real Property Approximately 30% of $995.00/month for office space for 12 months = "` $1950.00. FamliFirstlNH DJJ Revised Budget Narrative 10100 Section II: Employee InformatioQ For each employee list the following information: Job Titl Number of Months e Annual or Nourly Wage of Employment (for this program) Family Service Coordinator (F/'T) $19A0/hr 12 mon#hs Family Service Coordinator (P/T) ~ $19.00/hr 12 months Office Manager $12.50/hr 12 months Project Coordinator $12.50/hr 12 months Regional Director $24.00/hr 12 months . State Director $31J5/hr 12 months Corporate Support $12.00/hr 12 months {This page intentionally left blank} 196 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 5 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: County Manager Presenter: Contact: Andy Atkinson SUBJECT: Approval, of upgrade for Financial, Budget, and Human Resources Systems as a Sole Source Procurement and Approval of Amendmenf to Software Licensing Agreement with American Management Systems (AMS), New Hanover County Contract # 01-0171. BRIEF SUMMARY: As part of the adopted budget for the current year, funding was budgeted for upgrading our . r Financial, Budget, and Human Resources systems. After an extensive review by Finance, IT, Budget, and Human Resources we are making the recommendation to the Board to remain with our current software vendor, AMS. AMS has developed systems to move us to the new architecture needed for the years ahead. This comes at a significant savings to the County. We had anticipated the upgrade costing $1,000,000. • By staying vvith AMS we are able to upgrade our systems for- $696,000. Because we are staying with AMS the acquisition is being handled as a sole source procurement as authorized in North Carolina General Statute 143.-129(f). This will be financed over a three (3) year period. Adequate funds are in the current budget. The annual maintenance will be $115,000. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• Adopt attached resolution to approve the acquisition of the upgrade as a sole source purchase and to authorize the County Manager to sign the amendment to the software license agreement, contract #. 01-0171. ~ • FUNDING SOURCE: The project was approved in the adopted budget as a project to be financed for a three (3) year period and adequate funds for payments due during this fiscal year have been appropriated and are now in account 110.420-4256-7000.5940 to cover payments. Funds for "the maintenance agreement have been budgeted in account 110-410-4132.3700. ATTACHMENTS: 01-0171 resolution REVIEWED BY: LEGAL: ~ FI NANCE: Approve Recommend approv • BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: Approve ,_ ~~~A ~~~ ~ ~..- . ~ ~ r„ ~,, 4CTIfJ ' /iC~OM.M!ENlPS.1~~-- -;, APPROVED C9''~~ ~ ~ '' REJECTED p ~ ~~~°"'~ ~ RE ~ ~~ 19 7 MOVED p ~. ~-v .r, • ~- ~ POSTPONES C1 HEARf7 ~ .J ~ ~ ~~t` ~. ,.~ 1.~ . _ III (~ (~`-(c/yl ~„n , !~~ 1 '~~a. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY WHEREAS, the County is currently utilizing software products licensed by the American Management Systems, Inc. and such licenses are considered proprietary; AND WHEREAS, it has been determined that the existing Financial, Budget, and Human Resources systems need to be upgraded; AND WHEREAS, the software and architecture needed is proprietary to American Management Systems, Inc. and therefore a sole source procurement; AND WHEREAS, General Statue 143-129(f) allows an exemption from formal bidding for purchase contracts when a needed product is available from only one source of supply; AND WHEREAS, the Information Technology Director, the Finance Director, the Budge Director, the Human Resources Director, and the County Manager recommend that the contract be~awarded taAmerican Management Systems, Inc., the sole source for these products; amount for upgrade totals six hundred ninety-six thousand ($696,000.00) and consisting of software -and implementation services; and the first year's maintenance totals one hundred fifteen thousand ($115;000.00) dollars; AND WHEREAS, this is a project was approved in the adopted budget as a project to be financed for - athree (3) year period and adequate funds for payments due during this fiscal year,have been appropriated and are now in Account No. 110-420-4256-7000-5940 to cover this contract; and funds for the maintenance agreement have been budgeted in account 110-410-4132-3700; ~ ' ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover ~ . County that the contract # 01-0171 for an upgrade to the existing Financial, Budget, and Human Resources systems be awarded to American Management Systems, Inc.,;the sole source for these products amount for upgrade totals six hundred ninety-six thousand ($696,000.00) and consisting of software and implementation services; acid the first year's maintenance totals one hundred fifteen.thousand ($1.15,000.00) dollars; and that the County~Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract #-01-0171, contract form to be , approved by the County Attorney. ~ ~ ~ . This 13`h day of November, 2000. J (SEAL) ~ ~ ,~ . ~; , ,.. Chairman, Board of County Commissioners _ ..; - ATTEST: ~ ~ ~....~. . _ ... ,_ ~.; , Clerk to the Board ~ ~~ ~~b~'l~~~ ~a'~~ , ~ ' ' -,:;~ :~ ,~ ~~ -~ • • ~• NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR.BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Consent Item #: 6 Estimated Time:. Page Number: Department: Engineering Presenter: Dave Weaver Contact: Greg Thompson. SUBJECT: Resolution of New Hanover County Commissioners BRIEF SUMMARY: New Hanover County is currently involved, in a significant number. of capital projects. Atypical requirement for all capital projects is the issuance of the appropriate. permits which govern the type of constructing required. Currently, the County Manager or the County Engineer have the authority to sign permit applications. In an effort to improve the processing time for permit applications, if is desirable to authorize the County's Chief Project Engineer to sign permit applications on behalf of the County.. e,~~{ifF,. ~~~~a.`' ~'" RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: ~ la Approve the resolution authorizing the Chief Project Engineer to sign permit applications for~~ ~ - capital projects on behalf of the County. ,~~ ~ FUNDING SOURCE: ~ ~. N/A' ATTACHMENTS: • '+. RESOLUTIO REVIEWED BY: ~ . LEGAL: N/A FINANCE: N/A BUDGET: N/A HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A Recommend approval of Resolution. ~~. l VVItI IIIIJJIVitl LI\J AV 1 IVItl J/ VV1111111.'1\ 1 J'. ~~UfVTY COMMt~14N APPROVED G~~ - . REJECTED p . ~ . REMOVED t°l POSTPONED tJ ~~ . - ~EAR~ ~- i4 19 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS The Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County, .does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, a delegation of authority to the Capital Projects Engineer, or such other comparably .titled ..professional engineer employed, by. -New Hanover, Engineering, authorizing him or her to execute :permit applications and associated documents on .behalf of New Hanover County capital projects will expedite construction activity; ~ ~ ~ T NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that the Capital Projects Engineer, or such other comparably -titled professional engineer employed by New Hanover County:Engineering, be a;nd is hereby authorized to sign capital project permit applications, permits, and associated requisite documents for and on behalf of New Hanover County This the day of October, 2000.' '~ N~VV HHNUVEFl COUNTY [SEAL] ' William A. Caster, Chairman ATTEST: <.r'. c.. ~ 1~~..t~.l .. .. Clerk to the Board ~ ~~ NEV1l HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION .Meeting Date:. 11/13/00 Consent Item #; 7 Estimated Time: Page Number: , Department: Environmental Management Presenter: John H. Hubbard Contact: John H. Hubbard SUBJECT: Patent Agreement for WASTEC's Carbon Injection System BRIEF SUMMARY: WASTEC has procured a carbon injection system (CIS) for its number three unit for the control of mercury emissions. This system is expected to arrive at WASTEC the week of November 6, 2000, and will be placed into operation-within two weeks of arrival. The CIS injects a fine carbon powder into the flue gas. The carbon absorbs mercury vapors and is then collected in the baghouse rather than being emitted into the environment through the stack. Air Emission Regulations for boilers the size of unit number three require this technology for the contaihment of mercury. The Babcock & Wilcox Company owns the patent for the carbon injection technology and requires a one-time fee of $136,978 for the use, of this technology at WASTEC. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends entering into the attached agreement with The Babcock & Wilcox Company for the use of carbon injection technology at WASTEC in the amount of $136,978. FUNDING SOURCE: WASTEC budget line item 700 485 4193 6400 for carbon injection. ATTACHMENTS: Copy of the agreement between The Babcock & Wilcox Company and New Hanover County/WASTEC. REVIEWED BY: ~ - LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve HUMAN RESOURCES: N/A COUNTY MANAGER'S CO ENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approva . n/~nnnn~cc~~wi~ne~~ ~nr~~w~e~ /nnnnnnrwirc. YLMu1 ~ ~ ~ C®IIIMI~~1~ ~ APPROVED G REJECTED p + REMOVED Q POSTPONED C~ >~EAR~ ~ _ ~ 2 01 THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between The Babcock & Wilcox Company, a McDermott company, having its principal office at 20 S. Van Buren Avenue, Barberton, Ohio 44203-0351 ("B&W") and New Hanover County/ WASTEC having its principal office at 3002 Highway 421 North, Wilmington, NC 28401. WHEREAS, A/S. NIRO Atomizer, a Danish corporation now known as NIRO A/S ("NIRO") holds U.S. Patent No. 4,889,698 (the "Patent"); and WHEREAS, the Patent relates. to the removal of mercury from the flue gas emissions of.incineration facilities ,through. an activated carbon injection, Process in a spray dryer. absorption system '(the Process as claimed in the Patent, being the "Process");sand ~; ~: WHEREAS; B&W has entered into an agreement with NIRO, dated as of August 27, 1997; (the "NIRO Agreement") authorizing B&W to enter into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, New Hanover County/ WASTEC desires to use the Process at its Municipal Waste Facility in Wilmington, NC ("Facility"), and B&W is willing to agree not to assert any claims against New Hanover County/ WASTEC relating to ,such use and to indemnify New Hanover County/ WASTEC from and against liability arising from the .assertion of such claims by NIRO and any other party, each in~accordance with the terms of this Agreement. .. ~ ~ 4. . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and intending ' . to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as.follows: . _ t: ARTICLE 1-COVENANT NOT TO SUE ~. ~ , 1.1 B&W covenants not to bring suit against New Hanover. County/ .WASTEC for any infringement of the Patent arising from use of the Process by New Hanover County/ WASTEC at the Facility and hereby releases New Hanover County/ WASTEC from any and . all liability for any infringement of the Patent as well as a.ll other existing patents owned or controlled by B&W or NIRO which are directly related to the Process only at the'Facility. The covenant of B&W in accord with this Section 1.1 shall be in effect only so long as New ~HarioverdCounty/~WAS~TEC is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. ~~i~ , . . ~ c~~~i~ ~~~~~ ®~EWHANOVER.DOC ;;~ ~'9G~1~ Page 1 4 August zs, Zooo \ • ARTICLE 2 -USE OF THE PROCESS, FEES AND TERMINATION 2:1 New Hanover County/ WASTEC will use the Process only at its Facility in Wilmington, NC. 2.2 ,New Hanover County/ WASTEC shall pay B&W (in trust for B&W and Niro) upon commencement of the use of the Process anon-refundable total lump sum of $136,978. Such sum comprises the total fee and shall be due and payable upon commencement of the use of the Process at the Facility by certified check or wire transfer payable to "The Babcock & Wilcox Company, intrust for The Babcock & Wilcox Company and Niro A/S". 2.3 This Agreement shall commence on the latest date set forth on the signature page of this Agreement. (the "Effective Date") and shall terminate upon the expiration or invalidation of U.S. Patent No. 4,889,698, except for Article ~T and Article 3, which shall survive termination. of this Agreement. ARTICLE 3 -INDEMNIFICATION • 3.1 B&W hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold New ,Hanover County/ WASTEC . harmless from and against any and all losses; costs, damages and expenses arising out of any and all claims, judgments or actions by NIRO or any other third party only to the extent that such claims, judgments or actions allege infringement of the Patent arising out of the use hereunder by New Hanover County/ WASTEC of the Process at the Facility. 3.2 B&W hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold New Hanover County/ WASTEC harmless from and against any and all losses, costs, damages and expenses arising out of any and all claims, judgments or actions by any other third party to the extent that such claims allege infringement of any existing patent directly related to the Process arising out of the . use hereunder by New Hanover County/ WASTEC of the Process at the Facility. .~ 3.3 ~ B&W's obligations under Section 3.1 and Section 3.2 are further expressly limited and ~ . conditioned on the following: . (a) B&W shall be notified.in writing by New Hanover County/ WASTEC of any such claim or action; NEWHANOVER.DOC Page 2 AuguTZ8,700~ (b) B&W shall have sole control of the defense or settlement of any such claim or action; (c) New Hanover County/ WASTEC shall cooperate with B&W as reasonably requested by B&W to facilitate the. settlement or defense of any such claim or .action; (d) B&W shall have no liability or obligation under this Section if such claim or action • arises (i) from major modifications by New Hanover County/ WASTEC of the Process or (ii) from other. technologies provided by New Hanover County/ WASTEC and/or others in combination with the Process or from an aspect of,the Process not covered by the Patent and related proprietary rights referred to in Section 1.1; and (e) The total of B&W's liability, costs and expenses under this Section 3.1 and Section 3.2 are limited to the amount of the fee paid by New Hanover County/ WASTEC to B&W in accord with Section 2.2.herein. 3.4 New Hanover County/ WASTEC agrees not to challenge the validity of the Patent either through involvement in litigation with respect thereto or through request for re-examination of the Patent. , 4.1 5.1 ARTICLE. 4 -PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY. In the event that the Patent is held invalid in a court proceeding or the claims of the Patent are held unpatentable in a re-examination proceeding in the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, and there is no right of appeal or any and all rights of appeal have been exhausted, then this Agreement shall terminate. < ~ ~ ; - - ARTICLE 5 -MISCELLANEOUS ... ~ . - - B&W does not constitute. or~appoint New Hanover County/ WASTEC as its agent or legal representative for any purpose. New~Hanover County/ WASTEC shall not have any right, power or authority to assume, create or incur any expense, • liability 'or obligation (express or implied) on behalf of B&W. ~ `, :: ~ ~ -~ ', .. ~.f , r? ~ , 2 o gNEW HANOVER.DOC • Page .3 August 28, 2000 5.2 The relationship between the parties hereto is and shall be that of independent contractors. This Agreement shall in no way constitute or give rise to a partnership or joint venture between the parties or create an agency relationship between the parties. Neither party shall be liable to any third party in any way for any engagement, obligation, commitment, contract,. representation or transaction or for any negligent act or omission to act of the other, except as expressly provided herein. 5.3 No rights or licenses are granted by this Agreement, expressly or by implication, to use the Trademark "B&W" or "NIRO", or any other trademark owned by B&W or NIRO, or any trademark or trade name similar thereto, except directly in connection with the permitting and use of the Process at the Facility. 5.4 This Agreement and any of the rights or obligations hereunder may not be assigned, sublicensed or otherwise transferred by New Hanover County/ WASTEC, except as part of the sale or transfer of ownership of the Facility at which the Process is used, without the prior written consent of B&W, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder may be assigned, sublicensed or otherwise transferred to the purchaser of substantially the entire business of B&W. 5.5 This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties. shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Ohio, U.S.A. and all disputes controversies or differences which may arise between B&W and New Hanover County/ WASTEC out of, in relation to or in connection with this Agreement or the breach thereof - which cannot be settled by mutual negotiations shall be finally settled in the relevant Ohio state or federal jurisdiction in' accordance with the internal laws of the State of Ohio, this Agreement having been negotiated by the'parties with express reference to such laws and on the express and essential understanding and condition that it be so governed, construed and settled. . 5.6 The provisions of this Agreement shall be severable, and if any clause, sentence, paragraph, ' section or other part hereof shall be~adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be. invalid; such judgement shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder hereof, which remainder shall continue in full force. NEWHANOVER.DOC Page 4~. Augu~a~ . ... 5.7 This Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement and understanding between the. parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and cancels all prior discussions and agreements between them. Neither party shall be -bound by any definition, condition, warranty or representation other than as expressly stated in this Agreement. Any ' .amendments to or modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if reduced. to writing and executed by the parties hereto. ARTICLE 6 -NOTICE 6.1 Notices of every nature to be given pursuant to this .Agreement shall be given in writing. Such notices and payments to be made pursuant to this Agreement shall be addressed to the other party at the address stated herein or at any later address, notice of which is given by one party to another. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been duly given, if and when ' regularly deposited as first class mail, postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested. .~ ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized 'officers. .THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY NEW HANOVER COUNTY/ WASTEC ++ w`,~ , 11L1~. ' s Date: October 24, 2000 :,Date: ° Witness: - Witness: ~~ ~. • ,.." t F ~ , • _ ,. t _ , August 28, 2000 J ::. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD Of COMMlSSlONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . Meeting Date: '11/13%00 • ~ . ., . .. . Consent Item #: 8 Estimated. Time:. Page Number: •. Department: Environmental Management Presenter: Mylinda Jacobsen - Contact: Mylinda Jacobsen .. . ~ SUBJECT: + .Grant Application to the NC Department of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance entitled "Drywall Recycling Project" . ~ . BRIEF SUMMARY: ' ~ New Hanover County presently operates a solid waste management program that includes waste • - to energy, landfill and recycling. The Department of Environmental Management proposes to add _ • ' a drop off station, at the landfill, for source separation. of drywall. This project is beneficial in that 'there is a considerable amount of construction in New Hanover County. All of this cohstruction ~~; creates waste drywall'. A study prepared for the County indicates that Construction and . 'Demolition waste constitutes about 20% of the local waste stream. Assuming the C&D portion of ' the waste stream average 20%, this would contribute over 40,000 tons annually to the disposal burden. Estimates-show that drywall constitutes approximately 20% of the C & D waste stream. ~:• The. material is very easy to separate due to the nature and sequence of construction. ` Presently, Construction and Demolition waste is accepted at the secure .landfill and buried with the MSW. The landfill gas shows high amounts of hydrogen sulfide, a by-product of the anaerobic decomposition of drywall. Since the landfill is the focal point for Construction and ,Demolition ` disposal in the county, it will be most convenient for. a drop off center for drywall to be located at ~" the facility. -; RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: ` Staff request authorization to submit the attached grant application to the Department of :Pollution. Prevention and Environmental Assistance, if the grant is awarded, staff request the County Manager be authorized to sign, any necessary documents and approve related budget ~': - ,.. amendment. .. ,. . .- _ , . _ ,._ FUNDING SOURCE: The grant requires a 20°Jo match from.the Department. Funds are available in the landfill budget to provide this match ($8,000). ATTACHMfNTS:~ ~ ~. .. ~~ , . ~, .; ~ canddgrantGrant application Form_ ,.. . . - .. .. - ~- '~ Resolution 'resolution for gr ~ ` _ - ..:REVIEWED BY: ~. ; LEGAL: FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: Approve ~ HUMAN RESOURCES: N!A ~ . " ; • ~ ~~flGNT~ GOlI~M1SS1 N~ , .COUNTY MANAGER'S COM TS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: +~PpROVED:, ,..2O7 ' Recommend approval. ; . REJECTED . ~7. ; . . '/ COMMISSlONER5' ACTIONS/COMMENTS: REMOVED: C3 ``' . .. POSTRONED.~ '` `~EARiJ r. RESOLUTION ' OF THE - _ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~:~~ ~- .. WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance have "+- available grant funds for recycling of Construction and Demolition debris; and f NEW HANOVER COUNTY-SOURCE SEPERATION OF C & D WASTE GRANT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT C&D PROGRAM IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY. . New Hanover County presently operates no formal Construction and Demolition recovery program. There is a drywall recovery program in Pitt County. Staff contacted Pitt County .to provide information as to the scope of that program. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT New Hanover County presently operates a waste management system that is composed of a waste to energy facility (WASTEC), landfill and a recycling operation which includes the following: newsprint, cardboard, plastic, aluminum, glass, batteries, oil, antifreeze, paint, scrap tires and appliances. The County proposes to add a drop off station for gypsum wallboard or drywall. The station is proposed to be constructed in the 'existing appliance collection area. The drywall will be staged in 40 cubic yard rolloff containers until sufficient quantity is collected to transfer to a recycles. Since drywall must be kept fairly dry, a structure will be constructed to protect the collected material from the weather. The Department of Environmental Management will educate waste haulers about this program in the normal course of its education effort, through correspondence and workshops. Additionally, the Department of Environmental Management will work with the Builders Association and Building Inspections Department to encourage/educate builders to recycle drywall through pamphlets attached to building permits as well as through its normal mailings. . DISCUSSION OF NEED There is considerable. commercial and residential construction in New Hanover County. All of this construction creates waste drywall. In fact, a study prepared for the County indicates that C & D waste constitutes about 20% of the local waste stream. However, since the amount of construction activity is a . function of the local economy, astraight-line relationship to the waste stream is not realistic. However, should the C&D portion of the waste stream average 20%, this would contribute over 40,000 tons annually to the disposal burden. Estimates show that drywall constitutes approximately 20%,of the C&D waste stream. The material is easy to separate due to the nature and sequence of construction. Unfortunately, there is no program for the collection and recycling of this material. Presently, Construction and Demolition waste is accepted at the Secure Landfill and is buried with the MSW. The landfill gas shows high amounts of H2S, a by-product of the anaerobic decomposition of drywall. Since the New Hanover County landfill is the focal point for Construction and Demolition disposal in the County, it will be most convenient for a drop off center for drywall to be located at the , facility. . - The County is in the position to capitalize on existing land and improvements to incorporate drywall recycling into its integrated solid waste management program if requested funding is made available. It is unlikely that the governing board will fund the project without financial assistance. • DESCRIPTION OF PLANS FOR SUSTAINING THE PROJECT AFTER THE GRANT ENDS Since the County is applying for a grant for capital costs only, the operation of the project will continue as a part of the County's normal solid waste operation. The only questions related to sustainability are those of transportation and recycling costs. At the presei'~ 0 9 time, there are recyclers in the region that will accept drywall. The cost to transport the product to the ~ ~/ market will be offset by tipping fees. As the project develops, it may be possible to offer a discounted tipping fee for full loads of drywall. This incentive maybe attractive to generators of waste drywall. Perhaps the most compelling evidence that New Hanover County can sustain the proposed project is the County's track record. New Hanover County has developed and sustained a successful drop off recycling program and a battery collection and recycling program. These programs have been developed and sustained with and without grant assistance: IMPACT New Hanover County is a growing community, one of the fastest in the State. It is estimated that construction generates between 8,000 and 10,000 tons of drywall per year. It is estimated that within three years after the project is implemented, a 50% recovery rate cari be attained: This rate will~yield approximately 5,000 tons annually. 'MEASUREMENTS OF THE PROJECTS SUCCESS The projects' success will be measured by the tonnage of drywall collected and recycled. In the County's view, a successful project will recover 1,000 tons the'first year of operation, 3,000 tons the second year and. 5,000 tons the third year.. - BUDGET A one-page budget is included on page tlu-ee. 210 ~1 / {, . v . -. PROPOSED BUDGET REVENUES: .;.. DPPEA GRANT ,. $40,000 r , ' :CASH MATCH BY COUNTY 8,000 - . ~ .:'.TOTAL REVENUES: .. $48,000 ~ _ ,. .. .. EXPENSES:. - . -' ': ; ,. WEATHER PROTECTION $12,000 4 ADDITIONAL 40 YARD CONTAINERS 10,000 _ 'EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL (PAMPHLET) 2,000 CONCRETE PAD T 24,000 , TOTAL EXPENSES: ,• ~ $48,000 , . , .. .. . ~ ,. , ,- F . .. .. ~. .. .. , LL ., i ". . o .. ~. .. . c. ., .. - .. . a .. .• - . .~ ,. ., .. ~ ~.~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~z=t _ .~ ~ _ - 211 y .. ~ .ti PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS GRANT APPLICATION Ray Church, Director of Environmental Management Mr. Church began his career in the environmental arena in 1979. He has been employed with the County .:., since 1983 and has been the Director of Environmental Management since 1990. Mr. Church is involved in al aspects of his department including waste to energy, landfilling and recycling. Under his direction, the , Department has received numerous awards including two Engineering ProjectBxcellence Awards for ` landfill design projects and a National Technical Paper Award dealing with constructed wetlands. With Mr. Church's leadership, the Department has received in excess of $1 million in grant funds from various sources including DPPEA, NC Coastal Management Agency and the NC Clean Water Management Trusf Fund: The Department is involved in a variety of environmentally sensitive projects including,,.. administering :and monitoring contracts fora superfund remediation. site. Since 1996 the Department'has assumed responsibility for debris clean up of Hurricanes Fran, Bertha, Bonnie, Dennis and Floyd, Under .. his direction, the Department has developed and sustained highly successful County recycling projects; . ', Mr. Church will provide overall management of the proposed project. - . • ' ~ ~ ' PauLMarlow, Environmental Prosrams Manager ~ - ° ' Mr. Marlow has twenty years of experience in the environmental field. He has been employed with New Hanover County for 2.5 years. He has experience in permitting C & D facilities and handles all regulatory issues for the Department of Environmental Management. Mr. Marlow will serve as the regulatory contact for the project. Additionally, he will assist in the ~development~of the site plan. Mylinda Jacobsen, Solid Waste Planner , ' , •.~ Ms. Jacobsen has 9 years experience in the Solid Waste field. She has been employed with New Hanover County for 9 months. She has been involved inrecycling and constriction and demolition for seven years. She provides public presentations on environmental issues as well as produces educational materials. She . works with the local media for disseminating recycling information and recognition for our programs. Ms. Jacobsen will coordinate the site design, implementation and educational components of the project ~, ~ ~ ' ~ 1 I ~ - I .~ .~ . - . . ,,~-. ~ , - I .:'i. 212 ~~ ~ , ~J To Chairman Bill Caster September 27, 2000 Fm DexterHayes ~ -F , Re: Tidal Creek Watershed Management Advisory Board I received and inquiry from Scott McLendon last week about serving on the Tidal Creeks ` Watershed Management Advisory Board. 'Scott`s'employed'by the US Army Corps of Engineers here and is responsible for reviewing projects being undertaken by State and local agencies as well as individuals needing wetlands permits. He has provided us with a letter summarizing his interest . ' and qualifications. .. ;, . The Committee presently has 10' members including two elected. One of the pnmary purposes of - , the Advisory Board is to review and propo"se water quality enhancement projects for .' ' p tion an a royal the Clean Water Mana ement Trust Fund. Scot im lementa ' pp y g , _ is position with the Co s allows him an o ortunit to identi otential ro'ects that we could u . rp pp y fy p p ~ ndertake in joint arrangements with land owners and developers m their preliminary planning stages. . ~, , ., - ..... ~ ... a. . i, I think he would be able to make a meaningful contribution to theTidal Creeks Board. 'Besides ;; _ . ~' yourself and a City Council representative'other members are: ,Don Cooke, Carlton Fisher, Bill Gage, John Jefferies, David Thomas, Julie Tracy, Marian McPhaul, and Charles Wakild . ' ~: . .... . - . ~ ,. September 18, 2000 ., . TO: Dexter Ha es _ Y .. ' ' . FROM: Scott McLendon ' RE: Tidal Creeks Committee ~ ` . -: '` ~ Dexter,... . As discuSsed~with you.last week, I am providing you with a synopsis of my interest and ~ .. ' " ~ ~ ~ qualifications to serve on the New Hanover,County Tidal Creeks Committee. My sincere ... .hope is that my professional and academic background would allow me to contribute to '" the goals of the committee., 1. I have a Masters Degree from George Mason University in Environmental Biology and ":. ~ . ' an undergraduate degree from Virginia Tech.' My Masters thesis was involved with the study of productivity and nutrient cycling in-tidal freshwater marshes adjacent to _ the Chesapeake Bay. 2.. I am currently employed by the US Army "Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. ~I - , am responsible for the assessment of most of the NCDOT projects in New Hanover " " and surrounding counties" as well as the review of smaller projects by individuals. I am ° " ` ~ ~ familiar with most, if not all, mitigation activities that have occurred or will occur in ~~ ~ .~ ~ • New Hanover County: . ._ - ' :. 3.. I have a good understanding of where the enhancement or restoration of aquatic .~" , - ~ ;, " , " resources maybe available and have an excellent hands-on knowledge of the many..> - ` ~ :types of restoration, enhancement,'orgreservation options that may help to .achieve : - 'the goals of the committee. ' - _ 4. I have developed an excellent working relationship with a variety of interest groups ` '. ~ including private;:and public agencies, environmental groups, and development ~ - ' .. ,• - • interests. ;? . S. I remain firmly convinced that:there are outstanding opportunities for maintaining or - enhancing,the health of water resources in New Hanover County while remaining ". , ,. .... ~ , `. ;consistent and compatible with development trends. ~ ~ _ • '~~ " fi. , L-have an excellent understanding of land- use and its impacts"on receiving waters. 7. With the level of~interest in water quality issues that are evident today, I feel, it is ` important to have a better understanding of the variety of programs and projects-that •, .. _,. are designed to address these issues that are occurring in the area. I feel that I could , .. `;: provide a good overview of these projects so that duplication of effort does riot occur, ' - ~ ' `, . ' " or identify opportunities where various programs or projects may compliment each -~. ~~ w , - other,... ~ ~ . ... _ • .. s. , . - , ,. . :_ . . ,. ,. a.. ~ . ~ . - ._,, ~ , - ~. w :. ,-, - ~ ~ ., ~, ,.. ,_ . ~ ' . •. - ,. • -' _. 215: n . . . .. ,. . ..., .. . . . ... _ ....:. NEW HANOVER COt:]N'1'Y' ;~:•: .., -~SOARD OF COMMISSIONF,RS _ ~ ~:,~~_ ;;: ; ;:; ;,.,,;~ ' 320 Chestnut Streei, Room 30S ' Wllmitigton, NC 284U~-4493 '"'` w;,,. ._~_ • ~ ~ ,Telephone (9I0) 34L;7149.~, ,,....... ~_ ..._ ...... . ........ T~,.x,....., ~.;._._~.. ~Applccation far Appoin.taicnt to Boards, Committees, and Cotnsriissions. Appoimed by thc~ New Hanover County hoard of Commissionors. 17equest for Appointmont to: Nnw Hanover Coun Tidal Creeks Watershed Man ernont Adviso hoard Name: C. Scott McLendon Aow long have you been a residont ofNcw Hanavdr County?.g yezu~ Homo Address:. 1701 Fiold View Road. Wilminaiton North Carolfaa 284I 1 Mailing Addrasa: Same .. . ., Talc:phonc: Home; 9t0-68G-925 Businr~ss: 91Q-251-4725 • .: , 'Sex: Merle "Place: Whits *Age:40 . .. --. '"This information is raquosted for the sole purpose ofassuringthat across-section of the community is ~: ~, . .` ,.. . . .:, .;. **Employed by: US Army Corns ofRn~ineers Re~ulato~ry Division .., 'This information is raquasted for the solo purpose of assuring that a cross-section'of the comtunity is &pp0inted ~;~ '~ .. t., •*Emp)t)yed by U~ :Army Corps ofFngineers Rtr~ulatory Dtvtston M . ,~ . ~ ., p • I ' em to .ed b the a ., ... .- • r Y P Y Y ag ncy or dcpartrnont for which this appllca - **A ersan current ton is made, must real his/hor nett, ' of the New !•Ianover Colin personnel pol~unty upon appointment, uz accordsnec wrtYc gn P ' ' ty y ., . f ~ ; ~ ;''" ':.: Articla vt Sec: 4 , ~ `: ,, , ~, r, ~: .- M1 . a e ' •. .• ~~ ~L ,elf. w y . cob Titla: Ret=ulatoiw Project mana!~er - ;: Professional Activities: Adminiator Suction 4A4 of the Clean Water Act I2eeitlatory Proai~m ` in 6 . ~~ sautktesstprn North Carolina. Counties. Review North Carolina Dopartment'bf Trans op rtnnan oroiacts in southeastern Ndcth Carolina for com„pliAnce with tho Clean 'Cater Act:. ~Reyle~r+/Devetoo wetland and ` stream rriitizzatian nfans. Assoss proadsc~d development and imoflcts on surfaoo water quality. ` - . .. ~. ., Volunteer Actiyttios: assistant Den Leader,' boy Scouts,LVohintcor at O~dan Elementary School ; ., ::x .: ,_ ., ._ , Y y _.. ... ..,.. Wh do ou• wish to servo an the Baard,~ Commstree, or Cotnm.tssion rcqupsted`l ~ . . , . , i believe therta are exce(Ient oonnrtunities to develop find imolcmartt "water duality" projects that are not inyalyed with, or a reaulrernent ai; ~anv sort of Fodcrat or state narmit requirement. As fl resident of Ntwv Hanover County. (Nava a crest interest in the maintenance of wF<ter duality and the endrtnous bene~t5 that this brings to Now }•lanover County~and the surroundin~roeign. As awareness of land uae oauorns and water Reality have become more evident in New hl3nover County, I feel that the~rci are many potentially coo rativo o" ortunitSes where water unlit enhanccmcmt 'o ma he undertaken. 1 ~ ,. ~~ ° hat do you feel are your,qualifications for servtng~on the ~Basrd, Coctsmittee, or Commission requcstcd7 . ~ ~.. ._ 2 . ,. r .. NEW HAN,OVER COUNTY BOARD Of COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date:.11/13/00 ~ .y RESOLUTION OF THE WATER SEWER DISTRICT BOARD OF~COMMISSIONERS ~~' ~ ~ , OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY WHEREAS, after due advertisement, bid's were received and publicly opened by the Finance Department at 3:00 p.m., on the 25`" day of October, 2000, atthe Cotuity.Admiriistration Building;,. 320 Chestnut Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, and the following bid was received for six (6) remote telemetry units for the District, Bid # 01-0122: _. , Coastal Electronics, Inc. ;;; a , ,,. `. ,$34,017.00 - ... ' ,-~ ... - AND WHEREAS, the County Engineer, ;the Finance Director and the County. Manager , .. recommend that the contract be awarded to CoastalElectronics, Inc. of Wilmington; North Carolina;~' the only responsible bidder, in the amount of thirty-four thousand seventeen dollars ($34,017:00); AND WHEREAS, fiends have been previously. appropriated and are now zn;'Accouiit No: 800-470-4197-6400 to cover this contract; . ~ ~: ' -. ~` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the District Board of Commissioners of New , Hanover County that the contract for six (6) remote telemetry units for the Water Sewer;District, :.:: ~. .. Bid # 01-0122 be awarded to Coastal Electronics, Inc: iri'the :amount of thirty-four thousand' ~ " seventeen dollars ($34,017.00); and that the District is hereby authorized arid`directed to execute the contract, contract form to be approved by the County Attorney. _~' This 27th day~of November, 2000. ~ ` . (SEAL) "f Chairman, Water Sewer District . ,:~ , , ` Board of Commissioners .~. . ' ATTEST: ,,}~ 51; . d°c~tYSiJ.tC ¢Y~Alliii6 nW.F~++l ~~42~1 syR~°S~ ~ ~. ~ , . ~ .Clerk to the.Board~~~~~~a~"t~~f~ . :~ 220 .... ^~ ~ ~j~~y . . ~ •. '. - y k - ,, *` ~A7gv~ ry° r .^. ,+, n .~~~. STATE of NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF T'RANSPORTAT'ION JAMES' B.' HUNT JR. ~ 'DAVID McCOY GOVERNOR SECRETARY October 6, 2000 ' ' _ ` . •.. ' ~ ~` ~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ` ` REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Da#e: 11/1.3/00 - ~. Consent Item #: 11 Estimated Time: Page. Number: u ' Dep'artment:. Health Presenter: Betty Jo McCorkl'e,~Women's Health Director . . ' Contact: Betty Jo McCorkle - . - ,- . SUBJECT.:. - .. '. Acceptance and Budgeting of $50,000 Provided Through Contract to the Health - Department from THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN . ~. {SMART START) Through a Grant to Smart Start .From THE CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION to Fund Two Health Department Maternity Outreach ~ ~ ' .~ ~ Workers {MOWs) ~ L . ' '; BRIEF SUMMARY: ~ -.~. " The New Hanover County Board of Health has approved the acceptance and budgeting of $50,000 from SMART START. We are requesting approval to budget $50,000 from SMART START. SMART . ~ START applied fora $52,000 ($50,000 was awarded) grant from the CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL °- - ' ~° `~"~ ~ FOUNDATION to provide the Health Department with salary and operating expense funding for 2 - Maternity Outreach Workers-this FY 2001. In June, 2000, the Partnership for Children (Smart _ ' Start) Executive;Director and other Partnership boa"rd members met with board members from. the CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION about a grant, and the Foundation encouraged Smart ,. ,Start to apply for a grant to fund the 2 MO.W positions. - -: - .e ,. . .This $50,000 will provide salary and operating expenses foY 2 MOWs for FY 200.1. During the first year after orientation, training,-and developing a caseload of pregnant women, we will begin billing - Medicaid for services provided by the MOWs: This will generate revenue through Medicaid (XIX) ~ - to cover. salary and operating expenses for this program in FY 2002. - . .... ,. `Under the supervision of nurses and social workers, the MOWs: (paraprofessiopals) w(I provide ~ . services to high risk pregriant,women during their pregnancy (Maternity~Care Coordination-MCC) ~ ~ ~ . and for the first year of the child's life (Child Services Coordination-CSC). MOWS will carry a ~ ~ . .. caseload of 25 clients, making home visits to the most needy clients to accomplish goals .;. ' , negotiated with the'hurse and social worker. The most needy clients would be chosen from~the : , ....- resent. MCC caseload of a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = . p pproximately-1,000 women. . , .: ~ _ - °~ We are requesting to budget. the $50,000 from SMART START (from the CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL ~ _ ' ;';~ , FOU,N.DATION) and asking approval for 2 new Maternity Outreach Worker positions.' y :;- ..,., ,, •. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS• - .:- ~~ ~ Approve 2 new~Maternity Outreach Workers and the associated Budget Amendment #01-0070 for •~` .: < , ~ :$50;000.,. :. . .: . , .. . _.. . ._ ,. .- . ~: F, '.: ,: FUNDING SOURCE: ~ ~' .: - - _ . , ,: " SMART START through a CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL ..FOUNDATION GRANT ' _ °~- - f -:, .. ,,. .... _ `ATTACHMENTS: .. ' Yes. (12 pages including aletter from SMART START informing us ~,~t~hNei~ryg~r,Vn~t~a~~~d~frornlthe . tl . `. Cape: Fear Memorial Foundation for $50,000) ~ ,, ~. ~ " PP ,~ ~ .A ROVED ,. • ' ~. - E2EJECTED ^ ~ ~: ~~ ~' , , ,. ~`~ ' REMOVED ~ ~`, ` ~ ~?,` BA #Ol 0070.wpd , . ~ . POSTPONED ~ -. _ . i.REVIEWED BY: »EARfJ C~ ' -, ~ - 1LEGAL: ':FINANCE: Approve BUDGET: A ~ rove. HUMAN_RESOU~RCES:~,, ~ ~®a~ pP r ,~ ~~~ n.. ~~.~ NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR.BOARD ACTION - .. Meeting Date: 11/13/00 `~ J - Budget Amendment DEPARTMENT: Public Health/Maternal Outreach Workers ;. ,. BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-0070 . - .. _ r: ADJUSTMENT ~ DEBIT 'CREDIT Public Health:. ~ , Maternal Outreach Workers: .: , .. - ' : • ' ~ Partnership-For Children. Grant ~ ~ ~ .-• ~ $50,000 .. °' Salaries and Wages ° 4 $21.466 ' ~ fir.' .•." .. F. ' ` Social Security Taxes ~ '' ` • $ ~ ' ~ , ' - . .$1;642 Medical Insurance Expense •' " - $4,602 ~ . ' LT Disabilitylnsurance - `` `~ - • a.j. - `$49 ,Contracted Services „ , ,. ; .'' $933 •~ Telephone Expense '' . , _ .~ . , $120-. . • ~. I '' , . Cellular Expense -. ~" , ,. -, • , ~ $320 , ~ .. .. , ... .. .. .. • .. - .. ~ ' Printing Charges ~ ~: ~. ;, • x$500 , • Departmental Supplies _ 5 ~ . $4,968 - f Employee. Reimbursements ~ $800 ~. Ern to ee Reimb.lUniforms ~,., • Training 8~ Travel ~ ~ 5 .° $g U0 .. F .; : .Computer Expenses , .., ,; .. ~ , , •, $1,300 -• Capita(Outlay -Equipment ' ° ~ ~ ., $12,000- _ ' ._ EXPLANATION: To budget the,New Hanover County Partnership for Children grant in~the amount . Y' ford G:., i~ ,^.t.~c~ i^c`dtt 'tifi4 of $50,000 awarded~fromjthe~`Cape Fear Memorial Foundation to establish.a Maternity Outreach Program. This moneytiwll~be""u`sed in FY 00-01,to hire~two Maternity Outreach Workers and has ~~-: ~ een approved byEthe Board~of{Health 22~ ~ ~ ~ .r - -~ ~ .; ~ ~~ ~{~.~~ ~ , ~`~ fk7g l,~.1 ~ - . M ~ i.', 1:. . 1 .. ~ v T - .. ! (•, 1 ~ .' ~ . NEW HANOVERCOUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN `~~~- __>~ ~; David Rice, Director (., ` New Hanover County H'ealth~Department ~ --.. 2029 South 17'}' Street. ~ ~~~~~~~. % ~` ~~ `~~.,, '~ ~ ~ ; ~ J ~ `cs~ ,~!~ ~ Via}, / l ` ..,_-=-G.J ~ •v C: I~L.; ~_.. Wilmington, NC 284,0~1~,~~~ ~' r, {i ~~ ~, ~. ~ '-j "~~~~~1 ~~' .S__~._~, t--,~i..,~ . ~-~=~.,-;:.-~ -mot- s._,_~,~~._ October 2, 2000 , , ~ .,~~~~~ r'~, '< < ~ ~ r•. ~ i -t- .._... ~. 1_? ~ I.JZ -'{--~ \1 o'~-f i Y~1:~t--~ =~c~ ~~ r~ ~ `h`1~!j i _ ~ , ~: Dear Mr. Rice, It is my pleasure to inform you that The New Hanover County Partnership for Children ~~, ~,~~=- has been awarded a grant from the Cape Fear Memorial Foundation to establish a ~ _ ~~ ,r Maternity Outreach Program through the New Hanover County Health Department. ~" ~`~ `y ~ ~ ~~ The objective of this program is to enhance the Maternity Care Coordination and Child ~~ i p,,,,~,ti Care Services coordination programs that currently operate through your agency. The Maternity Outreach Program will help assure that all resources are in place for new _ `-~_ ~.. mothers to do everything possible to have a healthy"baby and become a good parent. _, `~' The amount awarded is $50,000 and designated to be used in the 00-O1 fiscal year to ' start up the program. Two Maternit Outreach Workers OWs) are to be hired b the ' . Health Department. The MOWs will be contracted and monitore through the Partnership. We are very pleased that, once again, our agencies will be working together to help better the lives of children. Thank you for your support of this project. ,3~0! Sincerely, ' ~jl1,V~"l1~- ~.~i oL~.~ ~'' F~'G Janet Nelson ; : ;:_ Executive Director 226 New Position Or Increase/®ecrease -Hours i Fiscal. Year: 2000 - 2001 ^ - De artment: Health .. ~`~ ~ ~~~'' { .Division: Maternal Outreach Workers Contact Person:.Kim, Marcy Contact Phone Nbr.: 6522, 6649 ~ ' Fund: 110' Agency: 510 Orgn 5157 o - ,; ' ' ^. l Am Not .Requesting New Positon 0r IncreaseJDecrease Hours .. ~ :Check The Requested Action: - ~ ' New Position O Increase/Decrease Hours ~ ; =,A, Ae. `. A newly competed Position Description (PD) form must accompany a request f.or a New Position. The Supervisor should complete the.form. ~ . . . - ,.. New Position ~ . - '~ Number Requested:- 2 ~ . , _ . Requested Positon Classification Title: -, . _ . -, _ Medical Office Assistant ~. - :; . Requested Pay Grade: 111. ~ ': ~ ~. ~ - . . - . ,. ; . . P sted Action:. ~~ ,. ~~. w. ~ . roposed Effective. Date Of Reque ~~ 'Check one: ~ ~ ~ ,. , '., :: ®Full-Time ^ Part-Time ^ 50% , . , ^ 75% '^ 80% -:. '- Justification For Requested Action- 'Y ~ ' .._. . - F ~~~ ~ The. Health Department has received sfart-up funding for these positions from ~ .: ., .. Smart Starf through the Cape. Fear Foundation.:" .Once trained, these positions wile .: . be self-supporting,through Medicaid revenues. ~ .. ..: ,. ,. _ , - ~ ..: .. How Will.The Requested Action Benefit~The County? . .Maternal Outreach Workers (MOWs) vvill provide case finding and intensive home visiting grid follow•up for high-risk~pregnaht women. -They will enhance the services of the Maternity Care Coordinators and will maintain small caseloads allowing for concentrated efforts with families: Efforts of MOWs will help to .~reduce infant deaths as well as'achieve the following outcomes for NHC resid~{~.7 • Earlier entry into prenatal care ;- Improved consistency of care - .. ~ ~ ~ , ::.~~ Decreased missed prenatal and child health appointments ~ ~ , t 0 E, 4u 1. Position Title: Maternal Outreach Worker .. ~ ~ . • For Human Resources Department's Use 2. _ Department name: Health Approved By: Date: 3. Department number: 1.10-5.10-5157 Job Notice ID: ' 4. Position status: New Start:Date:' End Date: Ifi "existing",please enter the name(s) and social security number(s) of the vacating employee(s): Title Group:., ' JNOT Type: - .r ; ..-.. Job Statement: ~ • ,. '.. , :_ ., - Entered By: Date: z -. e f.- . ;~ 5. ' Hov/ many position vacancies do you want to fill at this time? 2 ,. ' 6. Employment status:Regular ``budgeted"-full-time If part-time,. indicate the %: 7~. Projected duration of temporary position: 8..:Normal-Days/Hours: M-F/8:OOAM-5:OOPM :` ' If "Other", please irdicate days/hours: Other . • Rotating Shift:? No ". '; ' .. .. Lunch Period: 1-hour ~ ~ ~ ` .. Special or Occasional Days/Hours: If "Other", please specify: Home visiting. may require flexible scheduling in order to meet the needs of clients/families. - Work may occur before Sam or after 5pm. 9. ,Salary: 521,466/year $10.32/hour ' Grade/step:1 1 1 /OOA If other than Step "OOA", please indicate:. , Advertise Trainee Rate: No 10. Recruitment open to: The Public ~ ~; !,~ ,' Length of. time to keep open: 2 weeks. .. ~. - If "Other", please specify: ~ ,. 11. Recruitment sources: (check all~that apply.) .. ., - -~ Local-newspapers. ~ _ ®Out-of-town newspapers (Specify Below) ` " ~ Professional journals (Specify Below) - - .- ~ Other (Specify Below)- • p Please specify when applicable: Raleigh; Greehsboro; ._:. , i _ 12. Essential Functions of the position: 5(Thi's must be completed. List about 5-6 major essential functions.) .. - _, _. _ ~ , o Supplement the work of the maternity carecoordinator positions - by referral and consultation with professionals s Assst.at-risk pregnant and parenting women with the non-clinical ~d.imensions of pregnancy and infant care ~ - - .. _ .,, ' ,: , o . Recruit, women through extensive community networking to encourage, them to participate in the Baby-Love Program's maternal -and infant health care financing and service~be~nefits:' ; ' - o Provide practical help to .participating families to ensure: the receipt of appropriate services available in the community ~ ; . ~ ~_. " ~;r° < -, .~ s Reinforce health education and assist participants in adopting healthful behaviors and lifestyles ~ ~ - ~ ~; ~ ~` ®, Build a bond of trust and_ credibility (in the context of a helping relationship.) with women in ' _.. . Y P ~., ... P p ...,- the communit and rovide sustained contact v'vith " artici ants outside the clinic:~setting :' , ~.: ~. 13. Responsibility/supervision: (Scope of responsibility/positions formally,.supervised?) ' Responsible for a caseload of clients. Supervised by a Maternity Care Coordinator and Division Director ~~, ,. ~~ .... 14. Work setting/environment: Home visiting and out-patient maternity clinic.settmg.. - , ,ta 15. Education/experience required: High School diploma, experience in a hospital or~,other,:heal_th • -, ; ,. 16. Knowledge, skills and abilities required: Knowledge of .community resources. Skill .in '.;.". µ.'~. organization (must organize and track a caseload of 25-30 clients). Ability to work with high risk and/or~difficult clients and develop a positive, rapport. ;Ability to communicate well with: clients and health department team. ` 17..Knowledge or experience (exceeding those required) desired: at Fluency in Spanish. ~ ' :•a:•:a: EA' r>~ •a:~.:.;;rr'f•5:'t::£::r::5::::f•55:5:::::::;:?:r::?a::S::::S:::::::rY;i:::>::::5:: i :: ~::::;:!^: :::::':::::::ris:;:>:. A CO .::o::;;.a:::~t:::•::a:cr:;;:;:::::>;:::;c::o:;:::a:r::;:;>::a::::c;:>:::; ............. P 9 :5:::<:t::is:::>:.;::C.`•:::~::::::2;;i::::::::'<::is::i::i>:5:::;:i::::ii:::i::r~:: ii:?.:::i :.:::•:::: 2 :::::::..::::::: POSITION DESCRIPTION ~ p= 9J ~QO ``°FxaAn~A .- g .. .. TO THE EMPLOY Thiswritten information is of teat value in understanding and ewa uting the ' duties and responsibilities of yourjob. These questions should assist you in describing, o f r ork and-' _- 1 clearly explaining your duties: ~ ~~~ ~~' ! _, ;: .. ~~ ~° Read the questions carefully .and try to-answer so that ,.anyone who does not know the job can`;'' understand what you do. Think and write in terms of what you do and how and why you~do it. Feel free to attach any additional information you fee/ would be helpful in describing. yourjob. Also you ' , may attach additional pages if you need additional space for your answers to any of these'questions. ;' New Position ~ - ~ - ~ Health Name Last - First - Middle - - - ~-- - --Agency or Department . Medical Office Assistant Women's Health Care Official Position Title Division or Section Maternal Outreach Worker 2029 S. 17`h St. Working Title Work Address 910-343-6500 How long have you been in this job? Telephone Number. 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., M-F How long in this agencyldepartment? Regular Hours of Work Vacant 1 hour NamelTitle of Immediate Supervisor Length of Meal Break ,~ 1. PURPOSE OF JOB: What is the primary purpose and objective of your job? (Why does your position exist?) . This is~a case management position with responsibilities for coordinating a caseload of approximately 25-30 clients. It is ari , outreach position which works vvith at-risk pregnant and pareriting women with non-clinical dimensions of pregnancy and infant care. The goal of outreach service is the reduction of infarit deaths. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: (How would you describe your job to someone who has never done~it?) _ This position involves one-on-one contact in a rion-clinical setting such as a home and/ar community setting. It includes `_ home visiting-and community involvement in the recruitment of women to encourage participation in the Baby Love ' maternal and infant health care financing and service benefits. This position supplements maternity care coordination and .child service coordination and receives .referrals from professionals in these programs. The nature and scope of the services provided during a Maternal Outreach Worker (MOW) visit will vary depending upon the purpose of the visit. It must include one or,more of the following service elements: health education; direct services; emotional support; and 3. REQUIRED DUTIES AND TASKS: Please read these instructions carefully. DUTIE ~ KS LIST: In the space provided on page 3, list the duties and tasks involved in the performance of your job.. ' Describe ~n'a clear, concise statement. Begin each statement with an action verb (e.g., drives, conducts, repairs, files, types,. answer~~~~~~ s, Prepares, etc.) Avoid words like coordinates, handles, participates. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. ' After carefully reviewing each duty/task you have listed, mark each column using the following guidelines: , PERCENTAGE OF TIME: In the small column. to the left, indicate the percent of time you spend in each task listed. The total of `percentages cannot exceed 100%. ... ;FREQIJCNCY: •How often do you perform.the task? Mark this column: D (daily) or W. (weekly) or M (monthly) or I (irregular intervals) • or A (annually) ° , _ ~ emg ~e,m6st,important. IMPORTANCE: Rank the importance of tasks.m accomplishing the objectives of your position with '1~~ the ones on >-vh~ch ou s end the reatest amo ~~ 'Vote: The most rm octant tasks are not necessan/ y p g i~~f~ti~ne ~ ' ~'" 4. .PHYSICAL. DEMANDS; ;'For each'task, supply ALL applicable codes in each category -Activities Effort, and ~J"sual. ACTIVITIES: Does.this task involve any of these activities? ~ EFFORTS: Does this task require that weight be lifted or .. ` List ALL thatapply in the Activities column beside the task. , carried or force be exerted to push or pull? If so, 'how .much? . - Code Activit . - - Code Physical effort to lift, carry pull or push , . , . _ A Stand ~ . _ ~ .. B' ;` Walk •. 40 Up to 10 pounds - • , ~ , 'C. Sit .' ~ , 25 Up to 25 pounds . • D ` Talk ~ 50 Up to 50 ounds E ;Use hands to finger, "handle, feel-or grasp 100 Up to 100 pounds F ; Climb or balance . 1.00+ More than 100 pounds • . ~ G ~ - .Stoop,. kneel,, crouch or crawl • . • H , ~ • -Reach with hands and arms ` ` . • , . , L ~ Taste ,or smell ~ . , . r . . .. •, '. VISUAL: Does this task have any special visual requirements? ;: . :- ' •'- Code•° Visual requirement. ~ ` 1 ~ ~ `Close vision (clear vision at 20 inches or less) , ~ ~ ~ ~ . :.. 2 . Distarice vision (clear vision at 20 feet or more) .`'~ 3 - Color vision (ability to identify ;and distinguish colors) ` '° .4 • Peripheral vision-(ability to observe areas that can be seen up and down or to the left and right.while eyes..are fixed on a given point) bepth .perception (three-dimensional vision, ability to judge distances and spatial relationships) 6 . ~ - Ability, to adjust focus (ability to adjust the eye to bring an object into sharp focus) ~ ~ ' e..; 7 . • No special visual requirements - ," ~ 5. WORK ENVIRONMENT: For each task, supply ALL,applicable codes in each category -Conditions; Noise, Exposure . ` -to Blood acid Other Infectious Materials. "~~ CONDITIONS: Does this task require regular exposure to N015E: What is `the. typical -noise level .for the work ';; any of the following-conditions? ... ~ , "; environment while performing the task? ,: .Code Conditions ~ -Code Noise level , ~ • - ,`- A ' Wet, humid conditions (non-weather) VQ Very quiet (examples: forest. trail, isolation booth ` ; . B Work near moving mechanical parts for hearing test) • E ~ C Work in high, precarious places q ~ Quiet exam les: libra ;~ D :. , Fumes or airborne particles ~ ( p ry, private office) ~f :- E . ; -0. •Toxic or caustic chemicals ' - M . Moderate noise (examples: large business office, ., • x - with typewriters "and/or computer printers, light .. F , Outdoor weather conditions ` G Extreme cold (nori-weather) , . traffic, pumps, compressors, conveyors) °, r H ~ = Extreme heat (rion-weather) ~LN Loud noise (examples: metal cari manufacturrng, ~• I -~ Risk of electrical shock ~ r large earth=moving equipment) - `'~ . ' , J y `.r'Work with explosives ` " VLN Very loud noise (examples: jack hammer work, a;.'~ K Risk of radiation - front row at concert) ~ ~ r - ~ ... ... :` L '.Vibration. . ~~ 233 ~ - .~XPOSURE TO BLOOD: Put a check mark in this column if performing this task puts you in contact with 61ood or ther potentially infectious materials (fluids; .needles, etc.) ,• . F, . . .~ 1M 1 6 4 ~ ~!~~ ~ ~. EF % DU'T'IES' AND TASKS PH~SICL "~'/ >~ DEMANDS " ~~ORI~~ IJ1~'vTR Q '' : sY„ a w ~ w w H o ~, ~ ~ E ~ ~- Q ~ ' , o, ~. ~ w ~ `' ,~~ ~ ; ~ ~ z c:, z ~ p o ~ ~. E 20 Case finding Developing,and utilizing case finding. Techniques to encourage earlier entry into prenatal care D 1 A-I 10 1-6 N/ A' M E 60 MOW visits (one-on-one contact in anon-clinical setting) Must include one or more of the following service elements: Health education Direct services Emotional support Referral to programs D 2 A-I , 10 1-6 N/ A M E 10 Maintaining follow-up contact with infant, mother, and family throughout-first year of life W, M 3 A-I 10 1-6 N/ A M ,. ~ . E 5 Communication with MCC/CSC staff for: Consultation - Referrals. Review/report fmdings D 4 A-I 10 1-6 .. N/ ' A-• M E 5 _. Documentation billing/reporting .' ,. , ,. ~ .<.. D 5 A-1 10 ~1-6" N/ A M , . j~ .,. ,. , .. #,4 .-ti; ' ~ - .~~ 4.,.' i ~ t ~,. ' . ~~ ~. ..- ' _ r . °:~ ~. ~,'~ If not covered in the list above, describe any unusual and/or difficult conditions you. encounter in your~ob. 'Include commenr . about the physical surroundings, unavoidable hazards and/or physical harm to which you are exposed, etc. ..,. • _._... ~_ y, ,: - ~. ~ MENTAL DEMAND: Describe the degree of mental stress and pressure that is required in the performance of your;]ob. ".(Examples: Are thet•e frequent deadlines; extended periods of concentration; close, exacting work analytical work; frequent 'interruptions; public contact; tight work spaces; crises; etc.?) ` 'Case finding, maintaining follow-up contact and working with families in crisis who have limited resources ' ' 7.: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: (What is,required to perform the~essential functions of your job?) ~'. - `What education, training. or certification is necessary for your position? ., ,. .. , . - .. .. ` - .`High school diploma •: ~~ List any required skills{typing or computer skills, blueprint reading, etc.) ~ .- ~ ~ , . ,• ,. °., ~: Basic computer skills .. , _ `~ p_ ~ _ . What other special knowledge, skills~or abilities are necessary to perform this job? '. .` - Knowledge of community resources; skill in gaining cooperation from individuals, skill in working with people -establishing positive rapport; ability to manage a caseload of clients and take direction/referrals from professionals; ability.to document "~~` case contacts and comply with written guidelines for reimbursement ~ - - ~ ~ ' . ,~ How~much prior job-related work experience do you think is the minimum needed to adequately perform your job? . : , '.One year in related. field ~ . . :. .. ,. •. T 1 ., ,~8: SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES: Do you havesupervisory responsibility(i.e., for performance appraisals, disciplinary. ' action, etc.)? If not, write "NONE" below and go directly to #9: If you are a lead worker, do not complete this section, but be sure you have included lead worker duties in the preceding task list on page 3. If you do have supervisor responsibilities, give the name of employee and job title for each position reporting to you (filled and vacant). Indicate whether each, in turn, - . "supervises other positions by putting the number of positions or "0" in the space provided .,: '. ~ ` ~=" _ ~ "Name of Employee Job Title ~ ~ . # Supervises , ,~ ~~ ; ` . None '.. :. . .. , ,~ .. . -. ... ±.235 _ . ~~ } .. # of employees reporting directly to you: - "# of employees reporting indirectly to you: ~ `. 9. DECISIONS AND ACTIONS, METHODS AND GUIDELINES: ` ~ ~ ~~' ' ~ _. ~ f F' What types of decisions (otherthan "prioritizing work") do you normally have to make in~you~work each daylVireek? Assisting families with difficult social issues such as limited social supportlisolation;.inability to meet basic needs; lack of transportation; teen issues; family violence; substance abuse; lack of education; poor health habits; and communication barriers. Give examples of the types of significant errors a person in your position might make and describe.how difficult it would be for others to catch your errors.. What would be the likely consequences of such errors? Examples: failure to refer an individual to an appropriate resource; failure to document comprehensively. Consequences: denial of reimbursement; further complication of familyasituations How does your immediate supervisor assign your work? - ~ ~ ` F Job description; direct referral system from MCCs '. ,. Now does your supervisor review your work? How often? Scheduled conferences (weekly); job performance. reviews (annually); site visits (periodically) -. t ~~ ~. What manuals, guidelines, rules, or policies do you use in your work? .Baby Love manual/training; .county policies; Health-Department policies; Medicaid guidelines ~ /` Which of your duties do you consider the most difficult and why? ~ -~ '"One-on-one work with families, difficult .social/economic 'circumstances ~ ~ `` - .. :., . ---. . .. , . , y' , . LL er in, which you respond to them... Describe problems that arise during the course of your work and the mann A family situation may become more involved than is appropriate for MOW intervention. Communication with MCC team and supervisor would be essential. ` ' .. 10:'` CONTROL'O~F ASSETS: Do you fiave`responsibility for the preparation arid control of a budget? -~~ "' J : . "' 'Yes X No ~ If yes, indicate current dollar amount of budget: - ". ' .. . ~. ... " ~ ~ Do you handle money? Yes , ° ~ .' ~ X . No ' . ~,. How much annually? ~` ~ ' 11. EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS. What ma F chines, equipment or tools do you use, operate, maintain, or repair in the course of.your work? Examples include mechanic's tools, shovel, truck, mower, computer, adding machine, telephone, and drafting tools. Include the percentage of time spent in the operation, maintenance, use or repair of(each. The total of percentages cannot exceed 100%. " `' CO~~~ Telephone o% %\ Fax machine /° Copier ., . % _ _ a~° . 12. ,RECORDS AND REPORTS: Does your position require responsibility for any records or reports? X Yes . No If yes, describe the types of records and reports for which you have responsibility and - ' . ` include how your are involved in them (filing out forms,.. checking, validating, verifying, proofreading, filing Billing data for each MOW visit ' ~ Monthly in-house reports ~ ~' ~°'"-"~ Documentation (narrative) of each contact ` ; ~ ~~~~:,'~ i' ~'' ~ , ~.. .. _ ~ . . ° ~, ~13. ~ SAFETY: Does your position have responsibilityforthesafetyorfiealthofothers(otherthanyoursubordinates' or for the enforcement of laws and standards of public safety or health? Yes X No If yes, describe . , .your responsibilities. If you were careless in your work, could others be hurt? How seriously? .. . ,: 14.; CONTACTS: Indicate persons or organizations inside arid outside your section with which you deal, directly ~ . " in the course of your normal duties: Also describe the purpose and frequency, (daily, weekly, monthly) of such contacts. Do not include your supervisor. „ ' TITLE OF CONTACT AGENCY PURPOSE 'FREQUENCY .MOW staff NHCHD ~ Receive referrals/follow-up Daily ' ~~ Numerous community resources based on individual client/patient needs.. - ~:. ., «: ~ , ., .. _ ` .The above responses are my own and are correct to the best of my knowledge. ' . , EMPLOYEE'S SIGNATURE - DATE " _ , :TO THE SUPERV/SOR: Review the answers of -thee employee for completeness and accuracy: Use this space to elaborate on or clarify any answers that you think need it. Do NOT change. any answers: If you disagree with an answer the employee has given, give your opinion and identify clearly the points of disagreement. .. 1 have reviewed and determined that this job description accurately. reflects the position. I havereviewed and determined that this job•descriptiori accurately reflectsthe position with the following :, ~<~ ' ~ ~ clarification or modification.. - ~ ~ '°./ '~°'' ' 1` Go to the Task Liston page 3. In the small left-hand column identified as "EF" (for "essential function" ut an "E' m . .=. ; the space beside each dutyltask that you'consider to bean essential function of the position. B " s n I", we mean a task-required to achieve the primary objective an desired results of the position. Please he ".Guide to Determine Essential Functions of a Job" in making these determinations. ~ - • SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE.. .DATE . . ,... {This page intentionally left blank} ~ r ? D 1 3 - I ~ , _ ;., r. - ., ' }, . ti„ ., . , ' . ~t~ •~' ~ , ~~~ ^:' . A. -,. ... - ~ - ; ~ , . ., . . ,. ' ~ . .. ~~ .. , ;,, ,~, _ ". . ~23~ ~ ~ -4 .. 7 ... ,., .~ ~ .~ . . _. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS :REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION ~ . ~. Meeting Date: 11/13/00. ~. NEV!/ HAN®VER COUNTY SOAR® OF COMMISSIONERS REQIDEST F®R .BOARD ACl-10N .,,, ~ , ; Meeting Date: 11/13/00 ,_.~ Budget Amendment . i~wrxnn~ meiv ~ ~ DEPARTMENT: Public Health/School Health BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-0071 ADJUSTMENT DEBIT ~ CREDIT Public Health/School Health: Contributions From Schools $12,400 ".. ' Salaries and Wages . ~ ~ $9 658 ~. ~ .t .~ > .. i ' Social.Security Taxes ~ . ~ , , $739 ~_ Medical Insurance Expense - ~ '~ -- ~' $1,400 LT Disability Insurahce $22 Employee:Reimbursements ~ ~ ~~ ~ .'~= $222 Employee ReimbJUniforms '~ ~ ~ ~ $209 .Training and Travel ; $150 .. .,. . . ; EXPLANATION: To budget a contribution from New Hanover County Schools in the amou ' nt of $12,400 for a new 1/2-time Registered Nurse due to the split campus. The position will r,un :from"' .. Nov,ernber 1,2000, until June 8, 2001, and has been approved by the Board of Health. ~ . ~ .. ~~ r , . ,, . . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ,. ~ . ~ ,:. , , - ,., . APPROVP,L STATUS: To be approved by-Board Of Commissioners ., Y ~ . ~ 3. ~ 1 . n J ~ ;.. ' ._ Z t ., .. .. ~' . ~' ~ ~ 1 . ~ ' `I'f{~~QjG~{u~ ~.Yry~ ~T~4°Y ~ ~ /~ ~, 'om ~ ._~.I~~Y4.'l.~mlV l~~'~~''~Y.V~}~ ~~ P ~V~EI~ 1. AP 240 - ~~~~~~-~~~~ ~iE:IEC~~D " ~~~ ~~`ti MOV~Q ~E ;. ~~ •F~OSTPCNi;.'C p~~}# i _.; .~ .~ 1,0/20/.2000 H9:.44 9102544352 _ - 5U5AN .. ~ PAGE 01 , . . . ~ , ~ . ; ` . ~ DR. D.10HN MORR35;1R• Superintenden! ALFRED H. LERCH, Ph,D. . Assistant Svperinrenc/ent . N~ . , . • " SrudeRt Support Pragroms, Ile~u~O~TI ~ t Feden`ml Progroms. Testing Ci®~~ ., SGiH~IIS :. . , ~ . ,.~r; ~ v. .. _ y ~• . ~, ` ~ MEMORANDUM • ~..: • ` ;; J ~ ; " . TO: Betty Creech • • ., . ~ FROM: VAI Lerch l~'~ , . ~. " ' siti ~P"N-P ~~ RE ~ o on - : ' ". ., ' ' DATE: October 20, 2000 . , . •.. . ID: " FY00#20 , ,. . We will •beoexpanding our current purchase order to include a "/Z time.t~ position for New Hanover High School. ' ~ Please see attached amendment documentation far this addi#ion; at a cost • ~ a . of $12,400.00, that will run from November 1, 2000 un#il June 8, 2001. ~ . . , .; :,..,I . , C: _ • D. John Morris, Jr. _ Norm Shearin ... " ~ • • . ~ Tony. Lopatka ' .~ ,_ . . - Linda Bullard 2 ~ " . .... ,~ , ' ~" 9802 SOUiH 15TH STREET WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA ,28d01 • .. , .y ;PHONE 19 L O) 254-d206 '• fAX 1910) 25d.d3S2 L 1J/20/2000 09:44 9102544352 SUSAN PAGE 02 PURCHASE ORDER AMENDMENT FORiVI DATE October 20, ~ 2000 ~ ~NDpR ~ 34715 2423 REASON Additional nurse P.p, # needed at NHHS eta the ' _ split campus F ~, i ..4' I y ~~P~ _: ' ~,~~ /' 'r~''~ /~~a~„~J ~;~i3' ~~ . ~ - - r ~ - " .~ ~ Expenditure Budget ~~~ .w~` _ - Additional School Nurse (50%) _ = ,, . . Schooi Health ~ ' ~:~ _ .~ ~ 5169. - ~ , - 5169-1000 -. Salaries $ 9,658 .- ~ ~. .. . 5169-2100 FICA $ 739 ~ 5169-2300 Insurance , $ 1,400 - - ~. 5169-2310 LT Disab. $ 22. - ~ - .. 5169-5100 Mileage $ 222 - .. - 5169-5110 Uniforms $ 209 . . .5169-5200. t' Training.: :: $ 150 .,~ . . . ° ,- - ' Total - . ~. $12;400 ' z .. ~. ., r - _ . .. .. ., ., d. - - ~. , ~ - . .. ~ - - .. 243 .. r _ .. . .. ,: ~: ~ . : - .. ~. ~'+ 1 New Position Or Increase/Decrease Hours !- Fiscal Year: 2000 - 2001 - .~ ~ ~3 ~' g .. ., ~~~~ 4~ Department: Health ~ - ~~~~,' ~` "" ~µ ~~ ~ ~~$ ~~ Division: School Health ~ ~d Con#act Person: Kim, Marcy Contact Phone Nbr.:.6522, 6649 { 9 Fund: 110 Agency; 510 Orgn: 5169 ~ ~ ~ ' a ^ I Am Not Requesting New Positon Or Increase/Decrease Hours .. - .. ~ . 3 - ~ a .. Check The Requested Action: New Position O Increase/Decrease Hours. A newly completed Position Description (PD) form must accompanya request for a New Position. The Supervisor should complete the form. . New Position . Number .Requested: 1 Requested Pos~iton Classification Title: Public Health Nurse I - Requested Pay .Grade: 119 - OOA, $15.37/hr Proposed Effec#ive Date Of Requested.Action: November,"2000 . Check one: ^ Full-Time ®Part-Time ®50% -.^ 75 Jo ^ 80%. Justification For Requested Action . 10 months/year position. .Due to the increase in the number of medically-fragile students and the medications/treatments necessary to manage these students,. Board of Education has requested that wve employ an additional school nurse. At this time the nurse is needed to cover the additional New Hanover High .School campus. How Will The Requested Action benefit The County? Student health problems will be efficiently and effectively managed. This should ~,c absenteeism and improve school performance. Liability to the schools will ~r~ r~d~ced. The schools can com 1 with laws~re uirin that student health PY q g needs be met. Home schooling can be reduced. Are There ,Any Employees Currently Performing The Same Duties And Responsibilities As Described Iri The Attached PD? ~ ,~„ , .,~ Yes ~O No ,~ _ . .. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . If."Yes", Identify By Name, Position Classification Title And Unit.. ~ ~;~~~~~'°~. ~~ , Patty Hochwalt~ :_ Public Health Nurse I Communit Hlth/School Hlth £ ~ y `'y~` ` Candice Sancilio Public Health Nurse 1 Community HIthlSchoot Hlth Mania Swart . Public Health Nurse I Community Hlth/School Hlth Ellen Harrison Public Health Nurse Ill Community Hlth/.Personal Hlth a Gloria Umstetter Public Health Nurse I . Community Hlth/School Hlth `' - -Rose Bauerlein . Public Health Nurse I ' Community Hlth/Schoo( Hlth Dorothy Ashbaugh Public Health~Nurse I Community Hlth/School' Hlth Teresa Stanley Public Health Nurse IT Comrnunity Hlth/Personal Hlth o ,, n~ Frankie Mincey. Public Health Nurse I Community Hlth/Personal Hlth ,:- ~ , . .. Evelyn, Bowden ~ Public Health Nurse Il Community Hlth/Personal Hlth ~ ' - ~ Charlotte Norris Public Health Nurse 1 Corn~rnunity Hlth/School Hlth Leslie Yusko : - Public Health Nurse I Community Hlth/.School.Hlth Pat McSwain . ~ Public Health Nurse Il . Community Hlth/Personal Hlth~ Shenita~Josey Public .Health Nurse II Community.Hlth/Personal Hlth - ' Mary Jo Newton ~ Public Health Nurse Il Community Hlth/Personal HJth . ~~ Beverly Fussell Public Health Nurse fl. Community Hlth/Personal Hlth Laura West _ Public Health Nurse l ~ Community Hlth/School Hlth ~ " ... ~ <<' Patty Hanes ~. Public Health Nurse I Community Hlth/School Hlth `' - ~Galye Bordeaux. Public.HeaLth Nurse l Community Hlth/School Hlth '~KeLly Johnson. Public Health Nurse I . Community Hlth/School Hlth -- ..Deborah Goodwin. Public Health Nurse l = Community Hlth/School Hlth ,r . `If "Yes", What Impact Wouid The Requested Action Have On The Position(s) o Listed? ... - , . .. , . ., . . They would be able to provide .more comprehensive, timely services to the schools. They would be responsible for fewer students; liability related to service ~~ delivery ,would be reduced ~ "_ n . ,. . , . ~ ... _, , What Will Be The Impact' 1f Ttie Requested Action Is .Not Taken? .., _. ,_. .. ~. ~ ~ .. :~_ One nurse at New Hanover High School cannot cover the two campuses. More w;. ~, at-risk care wvill be provided. School personnel will have to neglect their duties to ~ ` .. , ..,provide health cane... ~ :: , ,. _:. . _~ - :.:, ". How Will The Position Be Funded? ~ , ~, ~ ~ :~ New Hanover County Schools ~. ~ ,~ ., ~. ~ ~ ,. . If.poSition requires. any equipment (uniform, computer, vehicle, etc.) please list the equipment and approximately cost below. ~ ~. ~_ .. . . . , :. . - ;Mileage - .$.222 ..Training/Travel .= $150 ~ ~ : . . 245: ~ ~ ~ ~ - . . . _ .. . . ~.~_ . , _ ,. _ _.. ., _., ' -R 'CORDS AND REPORTS: Does your position, require responsibility for any records or reports? a 2.~ ~, X Yes No If yes,.describe the types of records and reports for which you have responsibility and ~ ~ include how your are involved' in them (filing out forms; checking, validating, verifying, proofreading, filing Record health care provided on school Health records; prepare monthly statistical reports; interpret medical•reports for parents and school personnel; develop and record instructions for care. ~~•. ~ ~' ~ ~ ~.. o ~~ ` , ~ ~`-~, . > ,~ ;,~ ;~ 13. SAFETY: Does your position have responsibility for the safety or health of .others (other than. your subordinates or for the enforcement of laws and standards of public safety or health? X Yes ,= No , If yes, describe your responsibilities. If you were careless in your work, could others be hurt? How seriously? Responsible for patient assessment, teaching and treatment. A major error could be fatal or put patient at risk for disease or disability. Must instruct schools when children not in compliance with communicable disease laws. Must report neglect and abuse. - ~ .. 14. CONTACTS: Indicate persons or.organizations inside grid outside your section with which you deal directly in the course of your normal duties. Also describe the.-purpose and frequency (daily, weekly, 'monthly) of such contacts. Do not include your supervisor. .. ~ ,° ._ - TITLE OF CONTACT AGENCY ~ PURPOSE ~ FREQUENCY Medical Care Providers Medical community Access health care Daily Human Resource Providers Access7coo~dinate services Daily • School Personnel , NHC county schools Promote health Daily Community Health Director NHC Health Dept. ~ ~' Consultation, instruction,' 2-3 times/wk ... evaluation , ° ~ :., Other Public Health Nurses NHC Health Dept. Coordinate/assist 2 timeslwk " The above responses are my own and are correct to the best of nny knowledge. . .., .; •, ,•, . •.. , ..DATE EMPLOYEE'S SIGNATURE • - TO THE SUPERVISOR: Review the answers of the employee for completeness and accuracy. Use this space to • ~ - •elaborate on or clarify any answers that you think need it. po NOT change any answers. 1f you disagree with an answer ,the employee has given, give your opinion and identify clearly the points of disagreement ~"y ~'" •~:. I have reviewed and determined that this job description accurately reflects the position '~ ~ ~: ' - ..> I have reviewed ar-d determined that this job description accurately reflects the position'Hrith the following ' ~, . : . .. , clarification or modification. ' ~• ~ ~'' f Go to ~ ist on page 3. In the small left-hand column identified as "EF^ (for "essential function"), put an "E" in the sp b~s~ each dutyltask that you consider to be an essential function of the position..By "essentia•I", we mean ' a task required to achieve the primary objective an~ desired results of the position.` Please refer to the "Guide to* ' Determine Essential Functions of a Job" in making these determinations. `~y ) SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE DATE "' .~ ~~ }~ ,,r=: ~.. aT+' ~ ' ~ - ~ ~ t7 "~~~ REQUISITION FORM - -REQUEST TO FILL' POSITION VACANCY ..~ .q 1: Position Title: Public Health Nurse I For Human Resources Department's Use 2. ° Department name: Health Approved By: Date: 3. Department number: 110-510-5169 Job Notice ID: 4: Position status: New Start Date: End Date: ~ ~. If "existing", please enter the name(s) and social security number(s) of fhe vacating employee(s): Title Group: JNOT Type: Job"Statement: Entered By: Date: , • 5. How many position vacancies do you want to fill of this. time? 1 6. Employment status: `Regular."budgeted" part•time . If part-time, indica#e the %: 50% 7. Projected duration of temporary position: unti'I permanent position established . 8:. Normal Days/Hours.: Other If'"Other" please indicate days/hours: Mon• Fr.i, 10 a.rm: - 2:00 p.m. Rotating Shift:? No - ~ - . Lunch.Period: None ~ ..- , Special or Occasional.DayslHours: Emergency • !f "Other", leases ecif 9. Salary: /year . ~~15.37/hour ~ - Grade/step:ll9/OOA If other than Step "OOA", please indicate: ~~ ,. _ ..Advertise Trainee Rate: No~ . ~ ' ' .. ~. 10. :Recruitment open to: The Public Request permission to hire from last ,.. ~' ~ advertizement for school nurses'. Length of time to' keep open: Other . If "Other",..please specify: ~ ~ . 11.:Recruitment sources: (check all,that apply.) N/A ~. - ~_~ Local newspapers , : , ., ~ ~ ~~~;~ ,~- 3 ^ Out•of-town newspapers (Specify~Below) ~z. .. ^ Professional journals (Specify Below) , . ~ - .: ~ . ~., ^•Other (Specify Below) .f ,. Please specify when applicable: ,; r ~.. , ,J~ '12. Essential. Functions of the position: (This must be completed. List about 5-6 major. ~. ,~ essential functions.) , • Student physical assessments; conduct mass screenings , . ~~ o Provide health. care in schools ', ' s Teach school personnel to provide health services ® Health promotion counseling; develop and implement plans of care e Collect data and assist vvith strategy development ® Maintain school supplies ., , 13.. Responsibility/supervision: (Scope of_respo'nsibility/positions formally supervised?) Must teach grid monitor health care provided by school staff. "'~°` ~ " "" _ _, ~ _ 14. VHork setting/environment: Schools; clinics;.homes throughout New Hanover County . a~ 15. Education/experience required; Bachelor of Science in nursing; at least 1 year nursing experience or Bachelor's degree in related field, or graduation from anassociate-.degree or diploma nursing school approved by NC Board of Nursing and School Nurse certification. . 16. Knowledge; skills and abilities required: Skilled in use of diagnostic/treatment equipment` relative to job; skilled in office equipment relative to job; thorough knowledge` of anatomy`and :~ ~. ': physiology; current knowledge of pediatric and adult disease/disability management; excellent . teaching, counseling skills; good interpersonal skills; ability to communicate. clearly both verbally and in writing 17. Knowledge or experience (exceeding those required) desired: Previous school health experience 18. Special licenses or certifications required: `. ' Licensed to practice as a registered nurse in North Carolina; North Carolina drivers license and own transportation. Must have good driving record..;,.. ., ~, ~,,,- ~ ,,.., ~,, .; • . ,. 19. Physical activities and demands: Must be able to sit, stand, walk talk, hear; use hands to finger/handle/feel/grasp; climb; balance; stoop; kneel; crouch; crawl; reach with hanfls~and arms and taste. Visual re uirements -close, distance color, per,i heral ~de th,; erce tion; and.. ability to adjusf focus. Must be able to tilt 25 lbs. and move 50 lbs. . ~.. . . 20. Person authorizing requisition: David E:=Rice Title: Health Director ;. Date: '10/20/00 ontact erson: Bett B. Creech Phone #:.343.6647 Ext. FAX#: 341-4146 . • { . ,, . ,, W 1 M .:. .:r ~. ~ I N ~R 0 I ......•.,., ... D .~ .... 1 N P IT 0 - OS ........ ,......~x~r $..............::.r:;.......w.., , TO• THE EMPLOY ~~~QThis written information is of great value in understanding and evalua~fingy~t~i'e duties and responsibilities of your job. These questions should assist you in describing your work and ~. .clearly explaining your duties. .. - ~ .- . • ~ - Read the questions carefully and try to answer so that anyone who does not know the joti can • understand what you do. Think and write in terms of what you do and how and why you do it.. - • Feel free to attach any additional information you feel would be helpful in describing your job. Also you may attach additional pages if you need additional space for your answers to any of these questions.. . Health - Name Last First ~ . Middle Agency or Department . , ,. -Public Health Nurse I ~ Community Health. • .Official Position~l'itle ~ Division or Sectiori ,'° Schoot Health Nurse.. - ~ ~ 2029 S. 17'" St. . • . Working Title Work Address • _ ~ - N/A 910-343-6500' - How;long have you been in this job? - Telephone Number, `. ~ . :. . N/A ~ .. - - 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. •. •, Howlong in this.agencyldepartment? Regular Hours of Work . ~ • Betty B. Creech, Community Health Director ~ ~ ` ' ~ .112 hour - Name/Title of Immediate Supervisor Length of Meal Break ~. .. - _ ~ f ,1. PURPOSE OF JOB: What is the primary purpose and objective, of your job? (Why doesyour position exist?) . To provide skilled nursing services to students in New Hanover County Schools ;~ ~;:.. ~ - 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: (How would you describe your job to someone who has never done it?) ~ ~' Work with students, paren#s/guardians; school personnel, health and other human service providers to eliminate or inariage student health problems. Work with school personnel and students to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent . - disease/disability... ; , • . . ; ~ , . . _ . .. . - ,... .. _, - 3. ~REQUIREI] DUTIES AND~TASKS: Please read these instructions carefully. ~ ' ' -DUTIES AND TASKS LIST: In the space provided on page 3, .list the duties and tasks involved in th e ~ ce of your job. Describe each task in a clear, concise statement. Begin each statement with an action verb'(e.g., drives, co~irs, fles, types, , answers, summarizes, prepares, etc.)- Avoid words like coordinates,,handles, participates. Continue on ad i Bona sh ets if necessary.. ,, . ~; . , _ ~fter carefully reviewing. each duty/task you have listed, mark each column using the following guidelines , ~ - - • PERCENTAGE OF TIME: In the small column to the left, indicate the percent of time you spend in each .task listed.. The total of ,~ • =percentages cannot exceed 100%: - , - .. f. .: ,. - ~ . ~ ,. ,: FREQUENCY: Hovr often do.you perform the task? ~. .~ - .~ , j Mark this column: ~ D (daily) or W (weekly) or M (monthly) or (-(irregular intervals). ,or A (arinually)' r, . ,~ .. ' 1MPO.RTANCE: Rank the importance of tasks in accomplishing the objectives of your position with "1' being the, most important. Note: The most important tasks are not necessarily-the ones on inrhich you spend the greatest amount of time: 4. PHYSICAL DEMANDS: For each task, supply ALL applicable codes in each category - Activities, Effort,, and Visual • ~.., ACTIVITIES: Does this task involve'any of these activities? ' -'' ~ ~ EFFORTS:.Does this. task,require that weight ~be lifted or List ALL that apply in the Activities column beside the task. carried or force be exerted to push or pull? if so, how ,. ;.~. much? - Code Activi - Code ~ Physical effort to lift carry Rull or push ` A ` " Stand ~.... _ . ..._ .... ,. , .:. - .... B Walk .. ..- . 10 ~ lJp to 10 pounds ~ . .. _ . . C -..Sit „- 25 Up to 25 pounds D . Talk -50- -- Up,to 50 ppounds _,~ E Use hands to finger, handle, feel or grasp ~ ° ~ "~ 100 U 'to 100,pounds ~ ~~ . _ , F Climb or balance 100+ Mpore than 100 pounds G ~ ~ ~ Stoop, kneel, crouch'or crawl°; - ~ `" _ ... ~ . ~~. H Reach with hands and arms ~_ ~ ~ ~ Taste or smell , a ' ,, „ . VISUAL: Does this task have anyapecial visual requirements? ~~~ -~~~~ + Code Visual requirement ~ ' < ~~ ~ ~ - .. 1 "Close vis 2 Distance'~sion (clearl~swn20 inches or less) . - at 20 feet or more) -• .~ -. ~ < ' 3 Color vision (ability to identify and distinguish colors) ' 4 Peripheralvi,sion.{ability to observe areas that can be seen up and down or to'the left and right while eyes are fxed on a given point) ' .: - ..,y; • :. ...._ '. 5 Depth perception (three-dimensional vision, ability to judge distances and spatial relationships) 6 ..; ~'Abili to ad'ust focus abili to ad'ust the e e to.brin an ob'ect into sha focus . ty 1 (, ty. 1 Y 9 1 _ 7 No special visual requirements' '~` -' ~ ~'- 5.. -WORK ENVIRONMENT: For each task; supply ALL~'applicable codes in each category-.Conditions, Noise, Exposure to Blood and Other Infectious Materials. ;_ - ~ ~,;; ~ r ;~a , t ~Fti „{ ,,.~ ., ~, .'~~ CONDITIONS: Does this task require regular exposure to ~ NOISE:.What is the Typical noise level for. the work ". any of the following conditions? <, environment while performing the task? . Code Conditions ~ , tCode Noisa level , .: ' _ e : , ~~, ~, ,. A Wet, humid c ry q ondgons (non-weather) ,' VQ ='`for he uiet (examples forest trail, isolation booth e -Work riear movin mechanical arts ~+ aring test) ~~• "~ ~ ~~ C' 'i -Work in high, precarious places ., ,:;~ Q l :9quiet{examples: library, private office) x ; ~ ; D Fumes or airborne particles , M ` Moderate~rioise (examples: large,tiusiness~.office E Toxic or caustic chemicals with typewriters and/or computer printers, .light " F Outdoor.weather conditions 'traffic, pumps, compressors, conveyors), ~ ~ . G Extreme cold (non-weather) , ~ LN ~`; Loud noise: (examples: metal can manufacturing, H Extreme heat (non-weather) :'large earth-moving equipment) , , ' ' . I Risk of electrical shock .. ,~ j'' ~VLN +~ti.Very loud , noise (examples: jack .hammer work, J Work with explosives `~. `front rove at concert) ~ . ~, ,. ... , ,,,K .. ; ,Risk "of radiation :. ~ ,. ~ :: .. f , EXPOSURE TO BLOOD: Put a check'mark in this column if performing this task puts you in contact with blood, o~ ' other potentially infectious.materials (fluids, needles, etc) ..., _PI~YSXC ~_ A;~ ~ ~ ~,'~i~aRK ... .. ...................................................... (~ _ 1.,;.: }::;.:i1;(:i~:;ii:i':cC}:;.j:i y:;ii•'i; i;~i;3i'i::i2ii:i. :: ':% i ~ ~:'' ~<:: i' .;i ;f '...: ..;'i7.i%'::i?~<is2;;it.:~%:;i:<:'`i+i';.`i`;::"?:i: ': ~,:j;it`j : r.';;i;ii;2 ~•~1~1S ~Lt].7+? '%,; •:::::;:.;:;;.: r'•5?o::>.:•~:% " - `. ..._.',:,:.[.1::J: i;:.' : rn fl> ,» . . . .. .. ..... :.......::.::.:.::.::.............:....:...:.:::.:::::..:::.....:.:::::::::..:......:.:::::::::::..::.........:.. ~:::::.::::...:::::::::.::..............:::.,:. ..... . :::.::.:...:..:.::::.:::.:.:..:,.::.::::.:.::.::.::.:::::::~::::.:.:::..:.:.:.:.::.~::::.::::.:..~:::.:..::.:.:.:::.... .......:...:.................................:.......::::::::::::::::::;.:;:>:::::::::::::::::.:.:::::.~::::.:::::..;~::.::.:::::::::::::::;::;::::::,;::::.:.;>::; :::::...... :.: ..:;:: ~ . ::::: : :•: ...... ...:......::::: :::,:::: ..........:<;, :::;:::: .::::..... ...;~:::: •; ..:..:::.:: ::::::... .. .... :. .C? ... : ::,.:.. :... -:..:.:::..:: >::»~>,. , :::,:.fir, ~:»:: ::.::»::: >:<: »:;;>< ;::;: >::::>»:::»<»:<:::>:::::::,.::;:i,•":5:=:i;::<:i4r:%;:::::::~>:;:::.:::;i;S:::i<:::o:a:>.;:::;:a;z::;:>:::>:::;::::~:;:;<;:,is:::;::.;:;;:::»>:~»::>::>::>:~; :<:>:;; ::':: - a>r.' :>.; ::r,.<::>< >::;>::»>...:::::::. ......~ .::::.:...... ...:::.: ::.......: ....... : f1.:.:.. ~. , ::. - :::: ;:..:::#~., . ... :: ::........ .......::: ........... ...::::..:::::::.......................:.....::::::.:::::............:.:::.::.::.:..........:.:::::.:............:.:::::::.:......::::::::::::::..:............... :::................:.:::.::::::::::::::.::.:........:....::...::::::..::............:::.:.:..:...........::::::....:...........:.::..:..............::::.::::::::: ...::::::.:::.,.................:.::.::.:.:::::::.....:............::::::::::.~:......::.:..::::.::............::::::.~.:..:.....::::::::::::.::................ :..:..:..:. :: ,:. W.... .:.......::. ......... ..ss..::::: <.:........ ......:.: :::::::...........::,.:.......:, . ......::..V::::..:.......:~..... : :.... ......:..: :: Z::;:.:; . ,.:...:: ::....... .....;:;: ;:.~?.::; . . .:::.:...:. E:. _ 25 Do.student physical assessments ~ D 1 A, B, D, E, l0, 1,2, F M X . G, H . 3 - E ' for particular health problems (i.e. scoliosis, S , Conduct mass screenings 3x/ A, B, D, E, 25 1,2; F M~ - vision) yr. G ,H 3 H -E 20 Provide other health care. at school (i.e. first-aid) - A, B, C, D, 50 F ' M X ~ E, F, H, I, E 15 Consult with parents, school personnel, students, health care providers, D 3 A, B, C, D 10 1,2 F M and other human service-providers to access services; follow-up as ~~ - needed' ,.., ~ ~ • E : 10 - .Develop plans of care for students with chronic health problems D 2 - C, D 10 1 F M, Q. E 10 Counsel students, school personnel and parents regarding health care ' D 4 A, B, C; D . 10 1,2 F .- M and-healthy lifestyles . E Q Counsel parents and school personnel regarding community resources D A, B, C, D, 10 1,2 F M E 1 . Collect data. and assist with strategy developments related to school ~M A; B, C, D 10 ' 12 F , M health services ~ :, - • 3 Deliver and maintain school. health supplies ~ W 5 . A, B, C, D, 25 1,2 , •F - M ., - . . - E, F,G;H , E 1 Assist school personnel and parents with compliance with immunization W ~ A, B, C, D 10 ' ' laws .. ~ ~ E _ 1 Conduct communicable disease investigations 1 A, B, C, D l p 1 D;. M X . . F ._ E : 2 Establish and maintain health services records - D C, D, E - 10 1 . ' F M, ' .. .: G .. E 1 Attend jab related meetings and workshops M t1, B ,C, D -l0 1 F . M , , E <I Other duties as assigned ~ I - ° ` ~ <l ~ Provide disaster health services I A-I 25 1-6 A, L,N X D,F . ' ~ - G, , - . .. - ~ .- . K - ~If no t covered in the list. above,.describe any unusual and/or difficult conditions you encounter in . Include comment. 6. - .MENTAL DEMANDS; Describe the degree of mental stress and pressure that is required in the performance of your job. - (Examples: Are there frequent deadlines; extended periods of concentration; close, exacting work analytical work; frequent ' _„ • , interruptions; public contact; tight work spaces; crises; etc.?) ~ . Must collect accurate data to develop riursing diagnosis Must meet daily and weekly deadlines regarding. service delivery ~,~; . Working with families witfi limited education and resources very stressful '~ ~ .~.,. 9 ry. p Handlin medical" emergencies very stressful ~ ~. _ $ , , ~4 ~~ ~~ ~ .. ~ . . .. ', ~' ` _. F . 7.' MIMMUM REQUIREMENTS: (What is required to perform the essential~functions of yourjob?) . t ,, What.education, training or certification is.necessary for your position? ~ ~~ - ~ ~.. ~ .... _~ . ' ~~ , Bachelor's Degree in Nursing and one (1) year nursing experience. Licensed to practice as a Registered Nurse in North Carolina. i .:Valid NC'drivePs license. ~ ~ ... t~;,. - ~ a , . .. ., .. . , .. ,. ,. . . , . ~ .. . . ,,_ . ... . ' y quired skills typing or computer skills, blueprint reading, etc.) . _ _ .. - .. . List an re Operation of diagnostic .arid treatment equipment used-to perform nursing diagnosis/treatment ,~ ~ .; , Operation of office equipment required to perform nursing duties . -. •.. .. s~ v, ,. ~. ;.. ., t.: r . '.What others ecral knowled e, skills or abrlrtres are necessary to perform this job? ' ~dKnowledge of community resources, current record keeping requrrements,~confidentiality, and' current standards of-care; ability ' yv~ith others; ability to communicate clearly and effectively orally and in writing, skill in the safe operation of motor to work effective .. . ,~ . , . . r ,vehicle ,. .;.... . . ...... .... . >, ~ - ,, . ~ , . ,. ,. ~. .. ... ., ... „. .. _. ... ,, • _ . z .. ;. How muchpriorjob-related work experience do you think is the min4imum needed to adequately perform your fob? ' ~ 'One (1)..year ~ ~ .. .. ~ '. ~v .. ~:-. 8. ~ SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES:IDo you have supervisory responsibility (i.e., for performance appraisals, disciplinary . action; etc.)? If not, write "NONE" below and go directly to #9. If you are a lead worker, do not complete this sectiori, -put ' be sure you have included lead worker`duties ~n the preceding task list on page 3. If you do have supervisor responsibilities, ':~ .give the name of employee and job title for each position reporting to you {filled and vacant). Indicate whether each,'. in turn, ~~. ~ ;supervises other positions by putting the.number of positions. or "0" in the space provided. A ,.,,.~.... - # Supervises , Name of Employee ~ ~ '~ Job Title .. ~.. None ,. . , ~r~;~ L~ . 252 ~ ~ :s :. .., , ~ , , . ... .. .,~ . -~ ' # of employees reporting directly to you: ' .# of employees reporting indirectly to you. t } ,.. .. 9: ,~ DECISIONS AND ACTIONS,. METHODS AND GUIDELINES: ~ - = What types of decisions (other than "prioritizing work") do you normally have to make in your work each daylweek? - ' ~ ism diagnosis . - . - u~ r , ~'' 9 4 t community resources to access ~ ~ ,..H ~~~" term+ne needsforassistance - - fi.~' .Give examples of the types of significant errors a person in your position might make and describe how difficult • it would be for others~to catch your errors. What would be fhe likely consequences.of such errors? . Inapp~o,priate .nursing assessment could lead to severe medical problems for students. Could sometimes be caught if student - accessed'care elsewhere. Incorrect or incomplete recording could allow problems to become more severe. 9 , -Now does your immediate-.supervisor assign your work? . " Work as assigned verbally and/or in writing ' . ' , .Job description defines specific duties ~ ; ~ ~ ~ . How does your supervisor review your work? How often? '; ' --: Work is reviewed. by observation; conferences, consultation. with school personnel and team leader. Forrnal job performance: • ~ ~. _ - ~: . a raisal com leted early. - PP ., , P Y, ,.. .r ,,What manuals, guidelines, rules, or policies do you use in your work? -.. - , ~rth Carolina Nurse Practice Act; School Health Manual; current practice guidelines; federal, state, county.agency policies and ' ~ocedures, physician orders. , • ' W .. Which of your duties do you consider the most difficult and why? ~ - . ~; Working"with families with limited education and resources - it is hard to meet 4he student's health needs in this type of situation. , Prioritizing work when there is so much that needs to be done. ~ - - ' '. Describe problems that arise during the course of your work and the manner in which you respond to them - ' Anxiety of school personnel in handling health problems -.teaching them how to perform, specific procedures, trying to be - available for consultation.- - - _ 'Unable •to ,meet health. needs of students -- search. for community resources to meet these needs.; consult. with team leader, supervisor. ., .. .. o- , ,. - •, - . .,. . 10. ~~ CONTROL OF ASSETS: Do you have responsibility for the preparation and control. of a budget? , a ~ '~•Yes X No If yes, indicate current dollar amount of budget: ' .. - Do yourhandle money? Yes X ~ No ~.' How much annually? ~• , 11. • : EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS: What machines, equipment or tools do you use, operate, maintain, or repair iri the • course of your work? Examples include mechanic's tools, shovel, truck, mower, computer, adding machine, telephone, and drafting tools. Include the percentage of time spent in the operation; maintenance, use or repair , • of each. The total of percentages cannot exceed 100%. 25 ° Otoscope . _ 3 °/, Car 10 /° Scales ,~. ° Audiovisual aids ' ~ °/ . ,, 2 /o Z_ ° ` Sphyginotonometer 1 % Thermometer ~ . , 0 -...:Stethoscope ` 1 % Telephone 5 /° •. . y {This page intentionally left blank} .. ,_ ~.. ,. , .. , . ._ .. .. .. : a. r.. _ .. .. - .. _, ,. .. ~ h z , .. > - - A i .. .. ~ .. ~ , ,. I _ ~' ~.. .. : ~ ~. r 1 5 3.: ~ .-. '. . .. r .. . rt. - .. . r r r.. ~ . . ,.. ~~ v .. .. n. ~ ... r i ~. i •~ . . t' ., t ~. . i .. ~ ~ . ~ ~. ... ' r ''b" ~y r •'. 4 ~ .. .. ,~ 1 ~, .. f ~ ~ r A.. .. r ( ~ :-.. 2 54 . ._ _ .. ~_ . ~ ._ y _~, . NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 S Consent item#: 13 Estimated Time: Page Number: Department: Planning Presenter: Dexter Hayes Contact: Dexter Hayes SUBJECT: DOT Drainage System Impacting the Futch Creek Watershed BRIEF SUMMARY: Following recent discussions with DOT officials we have learned that a proposed drainage outlet for the planned US 17 By•Pass near the. Kirkwood community will result in 3,400 ft of 36" and 60" pipe being installed. East of Market St on the Skipper property and discharging near the headwaters of Foy Creek. The Tidal Creeks Watershed Advisory Board believes that the proposed drainage system will have severe impacts on the water quality in Futch and-Foy creeks and has asked staff to prepare a Resolution to be forwarded to DOT seeking a redesign of the proposed storm-water discharge system that will not result in any degradation of water quality. RECOMMENDED MOTION.AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend adoption of resolution to be forwarded to NCDOT FUNDING SOURCE: ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Maps , ITEM DOES NOT REQUIRE REVIEW ~OUN~Y ~OMMI~ION~ 255 ,~; ~:° a ., a, I I •r ~ ~I 4 I I o I I ~ O$ nl T E,4 I I I Y~ \ - _ 1]00 PT Sta 1!4.27!15 ; ~ i - --- - -- II j l a ~ 1 3 i g N~-..._._..._ b d ~/ I I t - 7 •7,.,]] •1U R[vr 1,1,•1 'ro'w - ~ I m I ~ '` ~ , ~ + a ~~ ~ ~, ~ , ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A „ 3 I~ I - ~ 1~ Iro ~RI•' 6>• ~ g rn • I I o s I I I I `~ ~~ c~ m ~y"Db e I I '/ s ~ ~ ~ ~~~\ o~ ~N ~ ~wro ~o w • .• l i i ~ I \ ~ € ~~ ~ m~ ~ ~woo~ z I- r- ^~ ~ ~, a~. ~ 1 ~ 1 'b ~ o. - ~~ o I a i W i arm 0u"', \ / a~ ~ °` ~/ -Yl3-REYA PT Sio 115-09716 I ~ _ ~ 1 ~ i ., ~ ma, [^+- +~ END CONST ros]•se•n - 1 1 O ~+ -- _~ ,_ • o I ~ ~ .. ~ { ~ loc --- - --- ~---{--• I , I ~ I,o ~, II ~ O ~a „u ~ ~5ti 1 I I '^,~ ' Ip ~~ ~` a ~' o r-~ ~~~ / I I •f ilb~Q• f I I ~~ , , I I i {I;~ - 1 I I ;Ii, nsrscro-, 1 I I ~ .a , .. .. . ~].].] , . l 1. I m.].m +I ;. V~ - i r I I ~i~ °bbom°7~ ms's v\ ~` I :911 1 I ,I i I I N -I', ~ - of@v~'iticncn~ ~~ ~ m I I ~ ~ i' i ~.~ . ~ O ~~~ owe ~ ~~ ~ I ~ we I m I ; ' W I + ~ stn , ti `a I I I~ ~ a~c a i I I b ' ~ ~ ,~, i' ' a S I i ~' ~G d ° - I,- I I ~ I I i I ~+ tlIH . . a2. c0 ;, ~ Pc sra 116.43827 I ]]..u 1 ~• +]' ", I ~~ \ ~A d I. j is j i I1 `~~,`.\b ~\ ~U ~ I I I I it ~ ;\ ~\ \ N~ it •~ +.. ' ~m.t~ ~ ~I :~, s. c, Rf I arnI ~~ : ill ~ A .. ~~ ~~a ~~j~~s I. oR~ I .:I :: n I ~R~: ~ O > ~ .~ o ra' I I ~: r ,., E-TDE-TDE-TDE-.TDE- DE-- Ivry i i I {I ~'. -- --__~-' Il ~'-+ ° ~g ~ ~~ ~ I.. t a ~] e .. 5~ TDE'-TDE-7U[- Ii- ~~ .., o. - _ 3 g` ~ POE-POE-PDE PDE-P !; I 1 ~m`a p p § /~ E-PDE-PDE-PDE--PDE ;~ I I t I' ~ I ~,~` b o 0 DE-PD I I I 1 N ^e j. Lam. ~ 3Od 3Qd--34d-- -~-- ~ u i v I p' £~ a . 3Od 3Od- a P t--~Ol--~ 3Od-~--3Qd-30 I I ~ •• ~ i o, 8~ +nil j,+n D'r-~8 38~~'~ - - +..c~~,;;,~,3, ad ~ • ~ a I '• 1 ~ rl ~e~-' © b P"~°, ~ ~ r ~, q~--~~ C- M A m ~ ~ ~ ~ •:.D+ i- ~ u.]a~J ~ I ~ I ~,r . a- ~ 1 ~ p '} c+ r i ~"~ S~ 2~ ~x p~ • ~~? c'n . S I I ro.s. ! .]r.au~ +n.]•u _ - z x n aL r~u ~v •-ic~i~~ ~3NN ~o ~N~ ~ I ~~ I ~ ~ 1 cvv sM ~ z p~1 a f~r ~r ~i„ ~¢ 1 N O> ~ ~_ ~~~ -! >~ ~ to . v.:%i'a;~r"r-~~ `~ ~° I 1 T2 I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ T/ ' •° m ~i ~L d . y ~Fi .$' AIaTCH SIIEET H0. J7 •C•STAIp•$0 ~ ~ ~ '"~' ~ o a~ -+ Resolution Supporting a Redesign of the Drainage System Proposed for the U.S. 17 By-Pass and Impacting the Futch Creek Watershed in Northeast New Hanover County WHEREAS, New Hanover County has initiated numerous studies of its Tidal Creeks and Estuarine Watersheds because of growing community'concerns about declining water quality in . our creeks and sounds, and WHEREAS, many of our prime shellfishing areas throughout the County are fully or partially closed, and ; WHEREAS, New Hanover County since 1993 has established and funded an ongoing Estuarine Watershed Management Program as a collaborative effort between the County, the Northeast New Hanover Conservancy, and the Center for 1Vlarine Science Research at UNCW,. and WHEREAS, the Tidal Creek Program has funded Scientist at UNCW to gather baseline data on the physical, chemical, and biotic aspects of water quality that has resulted in unique research and demonstration projects and land use implementations measures, and : WHEREAS, the most significant achievement to date has been the Futch Creek Clean Water ' Demonstration Project which resulted in the. reopening of Futch Creek to shellfishing in May, 1996, and ' .~~ •:~ ;~~:. - WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners appointed a Community Steering Committee to complete a Watershed Plan for Futch Creek in 1996 which calls for a comprehensive strategy for.., ~; , . . r.. 'environmental protection and sustainable coastal development within the watershed; and #,. , , •..:u' :, WHEREAS, six years of research by UNCW scientists' has established that. Futch Creek, ' especially the Foy Branch, has. the best water quality of any tidal creek in New Hanover County, and >~, -~~ . _ - ,.- _' , ' WHEREAS, .the Board of County Commissioners have authorized additional Drainage Studies of Estuarine Creeks at considerable costs, and ~ s x, WHEREAS, New Hanover County ha's recently adopted Comprehensive Drainage Regulations , .requiring the detention of storm-water for the two, ten, and twenty-five year storms, and . '',~ ' . WHEREAS, New Hanover County. is the, recipient of a $6,000,000 Clean Water Management ' Trust Fund Grant that will match a $11,580;000 comnitmen't fromthe County for water quality r enhancement projects`in our Tidal Creeks. through the ,year 2003, and.. ` ' u ~°~ , S, New Hanover County is considering the. acquisition of conservation easements and ~P~ffers alon our estuarine shorelines that would be im acted b g p y poorly designed , drainage systems, and .~f"' ,- ~ ~.: ,_ ;'~ ~ . y , ~~ ~, . , t, , ' ; \ a. ;. NEW ~HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . ~~ Meeti~ig Date.:. 11/13/00 liESOiuTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY WHEREAS, New Hanover County has possession of a number of items of personal property which are surplus to its needs and desires~to dispose of same; arid- , WHEREAS, the items to be disposed are listed and submitted as an attachment to this resolution; ~~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners ofNew Hanover County that the ,Finance- Director's designated :representative, pursuant. to-tithe provisions .of G.S. 160A-27.0, is hereby.authorized to dispose of all of the personal property as listed for cash or check at ari auctiori,'~and that said `representative be further'~authorized acid 'directed to execute necessary documents, transfer title, add items to or delete items from the auction list, and perform all necessary functions associated with this auction, to be held Saturday, December 2, 2000. at 9:00 a.m. at the Property Management Maintenance~Facility, Division Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina: _ ~~ Adopted this 13th day of November, 2000. ~ ~. ' ,' ~ . (SEAL) "J NEW HANOVER COUNTY•AUCTION LIST for 12/02/00 11 /07/2000 ~ ' °'' NEW HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION LIST for 12/02!00 AUCTION FIXED ASSET DESCRIPTION SERIAL. I MODEL __I TAG # # # # 43A _ __ Brothers Electric Typewriter _ ~ - - -- .-- 438 _____ _ _ Gas Guard -_- ' 43C __ 43D Lexmark Printer Set of Gauges -- - ------- , - ---- --- j 44A IBM Monitor 23-V4071 4~ IBM Monitor 23-CM616 j 44C - IBM Monitor 23-ZXA03 ` ., --__------ -- --- ~ T ; 144D 1BM Monitor _~ 88-P7469 __. ; T.-- 44E ---- - _ IBM Monitor - -- -- ------- 72-1415339 _ _ i 44F __ --- - -- ___ IBM ASCII Terminal 88-HHDR5 44G 012757 IBM PS/2 Computer 23-4L91V 44H -- 011468 IBM Terminal - -- --- ----- 23-HRR12 45A HP Computer -- - ---- - _ 3208F04769 _ - - 45B __ HP Monitor _ KR20691940 -- ~- 45C _ __ 010345-01 Monitor , -- 23-WAK79 _ 45D Terminal ~. - - ---- -- ------__ ...,..1 45E&45F __ _ Keyboard/Monitor _ - ---------_- 45G & 45H ___ _ Keyboard/Monitor -- ---- ~---- 451 Keybdai-d/Monitor • ~ ~ 23-31248 45J --- 011477 IBM Terminal --- _ 23-34XC78 , 45K & 45L Keyboard/Monitor _ ;-- , . !~; --"---"-- ---- 45M _ 010597 Terminal 23-RT004 ~ - 45N Monitor d• , ~. --- ---------- 450 & 45P 011349 IBM Terminal/Keyboard , . 23-FXZ72 ' ~i 45Q & 45R _ 01145_2 IBM Terminal/Keyboard _ 23-FCX05 '~ 45S & 45T IBM Monitor/Keyboard • 45U 010591 tBM Terminal - __ 88-BL535 , 45V - --- - __ _ .010582 IBM Terminal 88-6L464 '-' -- i46A ____ __ _ ------- _ __ Keyboards _ - -- , 46B Manual Olivetti Typewriter - • ,: .; -- - - ~ . , I 46C Sharp FO-550 Fax Machine - -- --- ~ 1 - --- 47A ~ - - - Sears Craftsman Rooter i . • 47C Sm Bench Drill Press - - ~ -- -• ~ - - ~' 48A _ Dayton Air Compressor .. - ~ ~ - ~~'1 486. Router - - - - - ----- - - - = ! --- ' -_ _ _ f _ } , . ~ _ 48C-_ ---- ------- -- Mudd Pump -_-- --, -- _._ _,_ - - - I ` 49A 496 Humidifier ~ - Minute Master Microwave - -'t, ~ - -.-- - I , _ `. • -- - .- : - - - -- 50A - 011339 IBM Terminal ~ 23-FYW63 • _ _ - ~ -; 506 50G 011496 IBM Terminal 011481 IBM Terminal __ 23-HWD19 23-HVH52 ~ _- 50D & 50E. Keyboard/Monitor ~- a ; . ±, ..{. ~ - --- 50F & 50G 50H & 501 012533 Terminal/Keyboard 010581 & 011581 Terminal/Keyboard ' 23-D9462 _ 23-DXP53, 23-RP570 _ 50J _& 50K _ 010590 IBM Terminal ~ ~> ~ 23-RT016 ~ I - 50L & 50M _ 011650 IBM Terminal/Keyboard ;- ~. d ; __ _ _ 88-KN646 _ _.. a ! 50N & b00 - -- y 011316 IBM Terminal/Ke board Y -- _--- - _ -- 50P - -- Keyboard - ~ -- --_ _.. ,, _...- -i 50,Q Monitor ----t 23 N1124 ~ I ___ 50R & 50S SOT & 50U _ Monitor/Keyboard - °;~t, -- -- - -- - • .~ n __ _ ~ _ __ _•I 010598 Monitor/Keyboard - 23 RT012 50V & 50W _ _ Monitor%Keyboard , • > • :,- ~ - ~ i -- , --- -_ _ 51A ------ -- --- - - --- ___ ._ _-. _.__ _ F0330 Fax Machine - I - - - 51 B F0330 Fax Machine - "- - "" !. 51C ---- _ _ _ _ Panasonic Fax Machine ~ - _-. ~ ! 52A a . 010397. Hard Disk Drive -- - - -- t ~ -- - - 1 -_- _ _ - -_- 52B -.- -_ ._ , .010345 Hard Disk Drive _ - -----~ ..~ ,, __-- - - -" ~ 52C 011962 Hard Disk Drive G..' -- ~ ', ; `. , - ----~ ----- L:16EVERLY\AUCTWKS. WK4 i - " _. - .... ~ _ ,. , NEW, HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION. LIST for 12/02/00 ~ . ' ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ AUCTION ~ .FIXED ASSET • " DESCRIPTION' : T "SERIAL ~ MODEL - , ~TAG ## rr 53A ~ 536 53C 54A & 54B 54C & 54D ~'S5A , , # --- -- - ~ - ----; -- --- IBM Proprinter XL24 IBM PS/2 Computer - UPS Protector -- - _ --~ Monitor/Keyboard . Monitor/Keyboard Metal-Desk ° # --- 11-0086449 - -___ ' ` ~ _ - # --- ---- ---_ • ___ ' ' . '• r ~ 556 ~ . . ; . Metal Bookcase -~ t 55C _ -. Computer Table - -, , ~ 55D Wood Desk -- ---- I 56A° Metal Desk _ ----- • 57A & 576 Series 6800Intergraph H12YH2 ~ ~ , 58A Computer/Utility Table - --- • .• 58B 05147 Panasonic Copier ~ = I " . ° 59A ~' 2 Card Catalog & 2 Drawer Boxes --- --{ ~ .• .: `~ 59B , Bookcase Top ;, 60 011144 Minolta EP31.70 Copier 3615790 • i 61 Keyboards - 62 ^ • -- 63A" 63B -. 63C 000000000005952 - -- - Microfiche ReadedPrinter - -- -- -- -- Card Catalog Card Catalog . Card Catalog -- -- - -- --- _ . _ --- - - -- -- -- - L j 63D ~ Card Catalog -- -- " 63E . Card Catalog . ~ - ~ - ;~ 63F 63G: .. -- ~ Card Catalog - Card Catalog - -- -- - 64A. .. Desk ---- , ---- --- -- 64'g --- Desk - --_ - t 64C ,' .. - - Desk - -- -.- - - -~-- .,..- ' 64D 64E-- ---- 64F, -- Desk Desk _. - , ----- Desk • . --- - ---- -- ~ -- _ --- - -~ -- -- 7 .:. 64G " Desk •• • -- - 65 ' '. Storage Cabinet _ - - --- ----- - -- i , 66 .. ~ 000000000000176. AB Dick Offset Press ` 67 ' 000000000007238 Exam Table • ~ : ;,~ 68A .. . 686 68C •: 68D = , Desk. Desk Table Computer Table. _ , ---- - - __ _ _: ~' . ,- . _ , I . , . ` . 69A _ Metal Cabinet __ -- - __ - - y. 69B 9B ~ ~: --, ----- Metal-Desk .. omputer Desk ------- , . ~ -- ---- -_ _._._ --- - - - - -- _, .....: - ----- _ - ---, 1 70 71 `. 000000000006938 000000000002491 Precision Thelco Incubator ____ .~. Sears Craftsman Ban Saw __ - - - - --- - ~ --- 72 Telephone w/ Equipment : 73A _ Coin Holder - '.. 736 - ..,Coin Holder . _ ------- ---- -_ .`I • 73C ' - File Cabinet ~~: 73D ., ".. .. Bookends -- -- ~~• 73E < .: Slide Protector :: -- -= ;. •y, ~ •. ' ~ 74A Cabinet ., ---- -- - ~ , ` 746. _. , .: - .. Cabinet - . --- I _ . 74C ~- Bookcase - --- _ ~ . -- . 74D _ - -- - ~ - Paper Shredder ; ' - 74E 75A - - - : -- - Metal Bin -- :_ - -- Computer Table - --- --- _. _ _ _: :.: .. .-. ~ . . . a 75B _, : Metal Desk - -- - -- -- - -- -' - --- - i 75C -. , . - Metal Desk --- " 4 --- --- 267 -- L:IBEVERLYIAUCTWKS:WK4 5 11/07/2000` ~' •~ ' ~ -.. ,. S ' .. ~ .. - _ • - i ` NEW HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION LIST for 12/02/00 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' L:\B EVER LY\AU CTl/VKS. W K4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION LIST for 12/02/00 1': ,:. "; , ;u; -- -- AUCTION, • FIXED ASSET DESCRIPTION -__SERIAL. ~ MODEL _ -_ # .: 1 TAG # _ # - --- - -- -- .. - -- 136A Compressor - ---- __._. -__-- __- ~ - -- _ 1 ,, --- ~ 136E Tool Box -------- -- ---- ~ -- ~ 137A __ _ Kenmore Washer -- - ~---- 1378 __ Kenmore Dryer _ --- - ~~~ --~J 137C Coleman Stove ----' b38A Hotpoint A/C Unit ~ -,~ 1386 Easef Board X139 Xerox Copier _ ~ -- ~ 140A Towing Bar - --- - - - _-_- , 1408 _ Towing Bar 141A ~~ _ Pump Sprayer ~ - -- ---------_=-yl 1416 ~ Pump Sprayer - ~J~ ~L-~:4~ ------- - .Opaque Projector --- -- -- - ---- _ .- ~ I t 1426__ Misc Shure Microphone _ ~ - ~ - - 142C Audio Speakers ,:. ___._ 1.42D Utility Cart _ i 142E 25 Anic - ---- - -_-----__-_ _..~ 1.43A Stool - - -~ ~ ~-- - ---=- ----- --- --- -- - --- 11 _ _ 1 1'436 Stool 144A Misc Tubing. ~ - 1.448 Headlight Adjuster • ., 1 --- --- --- --- ---- -- - _.. - -. _ - - --il 1~ 45 __. .._ ----- --- Chrome Stand -- --- .~ 146 Epson Printer - _-- ~ - -- : -- 147A TV Wall Mount __ -_-- -- _- ;~ 1476 ~, _ Misc AC Units 147C Heat Pump 1 47D Heat Pump •, 1'47E - - - ---------- -Rudd Unit ----- - - - --- - -_ _ -- 147F Janitrol _ 148A ---- -- ------ Chair _ ~ ----- - - 148~ ---- -~ Chair -- ------- - - --- -- -_.. _ ~ 148C Chair i '' .. ,. 1~48U- - --- Chair ~ -- - ~_-- L:1B EV E R LY~P, U CTW KS. W K4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION LIST for 12/02/00 I I AUCTION ----- FIXED ASSET DESCRIPTION SERIAL - MODEL I -- -...__...--- - ~-~ i TAG # # # # I 149E Metal Bins - ----------._._......._.i ------~-- 149E -- .Metal Bins --- 1.49G _ ~ Texas Instrument Omnilaser _ ~ __ _ ~ 150A, -- ~ Microdesign Microfilm Reader __ _ --~ _ -- --- j I 50g ~ ~ 1 Microdesign Microfilm Reader _ - _ ~ _ _ - ---__ - ___ __ 150C ~ _ Microdesign Microfilm Reader . ___ f __ -~ ~150D - ~ ~ Microdesign Microfilm Reader __- _ ~ _ - ; -__---_ T ._ i 150E Microdesign Microfilm Reader !i ~50F _ 150G Microdesign Microfilm Reader Microdesign Microfilm Reader - __ ______ ~ _ __ 150H _ - Microdesign Microfilm Reader _ --- _-.,_ Yj 1501 Microdesign Microfilm Reader - _i - _ 150J Microdesign Microfilm Reader ` - _ _ _ __ 150K Microimage Display Microfilm Reader _ _ 150E Boxes of Microfilm Supplies ~ 151A Chair _ _ 1516 Chair 151 C --- Chair - r------- ---i 151 D Microfilm Cabinet - ~ 1--- _-_ v__ . __ 152A 152B - ---- 153C 153D ~ ---- - Table Table -- ----- Misc Chairs ___ Misc Chairs -- --~----------------- __ _ __ ~ - ~ -------....--------_._..__..-1 ' __ 153E ` ~ _ Computer Desk 153E Metal Desk Postage Scale _ T I _ Executive Chair _ - ' - -- - . ..- --- _ ----- --. Desk _ . _; r' --------- _ - ~ -- ~ Desk. Desk - esk - D -- - Desk - ~ --- - -- _._ -- .- ------ - ~ i ,_ _- I , .__ ~ --- --- ' i Desk - --- --------------- Desk -----_ ---- ---- --- --- Desk ---- = Typewriter Table ' ---- -- - T ewriter -- YP --_-___..--- __ _' ;_. TYPewriter ------ -- - . -- - -_- ~ __. - - ' - ~' ' TYPewriter - - . I -1 TYPewriter - -- --- ,- I - - , -------- ---- Terminal - Terminal Terminal rt --- -----___ - ----- ---- ---- --! -_ ...~ ~ --- Terminal - ------ -- -- -- __ Terminal -------- -------._,..._._._ Terminal _..------ -- ---------- _ Table _....~ - - - _ Table - -_ - - _.- -- _.. -- ' Table _. . __ __ _ __ _.. -- -- _ _ , ---- - --- Table _ - ----_._ _ - -- ---- -- - ~ ___ _. I -- - ._. Table . -----------~- __ _ --- - _._..-1 - -- Table -- --- --- --------__ -_ _.-. ... -- _ - Table --- . - -------- -- Table ---- ----- - - - - --- Chair - -- -- ~ - -- _ - Chair ----- I Chair Chair -- - ---------_ __--. --- - --. ..y • L:IBEVERLYWUCTWKS. WK4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY AUCTION LIST for 12/02/00 r AUCTION TAG # FIXED ASSET # DESCRIPTION SERIAL # M~3'6--~T- ---- #~ Chair ~ Chair - -- Chair --~ - Chair - ----------- .I ---- --- Chair _ - ---------- - -------- --------- -- - Chair -- Chair -- - =-- Chair ------- --~ _.._ -- --- ---_ --- ------ ---------- --- -----__ _ __ _ - -----~ -- - --- -------- , Chair - _--- -- ------ - Chair ----------- - --- ------------.. Chair 000000000002374 1972 Ford Truck F37BCN12107 001701 1973 Ford Truck _ F60DV021986 _ _ 000000000002421 1982 Ford Bronco 1FMDU15E7CLA07168 __ ___ - ~ 001677 1984 Ford Truck 1 FTBR10A7EUD11681 ____ _ _ _ __ __ 1985 Ford Truck 1 FTEF14Y5GNA27590 _ ______ _ _ - 07253 1986 Ford Truck 1 FTCF15Y9GNA28070 _ ____ _ .004989 1986 Ford Crown Victoria 2FABP43G4GX169038 ' 01360 1987 Ford Truck 1FTCF15Y2HNA59114 ________ _ 01363 1987 Ford Truck 1 FDNF70HOHVA29558 010000 1990 Ford Truck 1FDJF37H1LNA53423 ___ 000000000007154 1983 Chevrolet Truck ~ 1 GCEK14D6DF330201 . 010226 1983 Chevrolet Truck 1GBHC34M5DV132791 _ _ _ __ __ _ _ I- _ ~ 004981 - ------ - 1986 Chevrolet Truck .• . • °.> - - -- -- 2G00014H1G119890 - -- -~ _ 01362 03979 03959: 05344 07558 010322 010191 010143 011780 012647 011893 010306 - ---- - 1987 Chevrolet Truck 1988 Chevrolet Caprice _ _ __ 1988 Chevrolet Caprice - 1988 Chevrolet Truck ; .:, ..... _ -. ~ _ 1989 Chevrolet Caprice _ . _ : _~ .__ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ 1990 Chevrolet Lumina ~ 1990 Chevrolet Caprice 1990 Chevrolet Truck ~ ~ 1992 Chevrolet Lumina 1995 Chevrolet Caprice . ,: 1980 Dodge Motor Home 1990 Dodge Ram Van , _ ; ------------- 1 GCFR24H1 HF372998 ~ 1G1 BN81Y7JR1612_37~ 1G16L5165JA153056 1GBHR34K4JJ129302 1 G1 BN81 YXK_A130922 2G1WL54T8L9116441 -1 G1 BL5472LA137145 1GCDK14Z3LZ202082 i 1 G1 WP14X7N91191 ~ 1~ 1 G1 BL52P9SR1.35587 F44CA9V702177 ~ _ _ ., _ _ _ j ___ __~_ _ .__ _ _ _ -. - _ ______. _ __ _ _ ~ _ _ -._.. ~ --- _ . 010908. 1990 Dodge Dynasty (Salvage Vehicle} , :,r.: . 163XC5639LD715071. -- 011897 1993 Dodge, Dynasty (salvage Vehicle) ; : 163XC4630PD157742 011898 1993 Dodge Dynasty 163XC4638PD201079 _ 000000000003335 .1973 GMC Van. TPY353F501737 > .. ___ -_-_-- -000000000007165 011055 1983 GMC Truck , :.° 1990 Isuzu Trooper 1GTBT14YXD2516284 JACCH58R3L8 912681 _ - _ __ _.~ - ----- 013330 - 1992 Isuzu Trooper ~ :. .. _ JACDH58W1 N790090 .. :: --- - 07675 011590 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass .. 1988 Oldsmobile Delta 88 .:: _ 1G3WH14W3JD31547 1G3HN54C3JW39936 _ - - -i _ _ _ _ _I - 011108 _ 1991 Mercury Cougar x,; ~ :;; ~~ ... ; 1 MEPM6042MH62599 _ ------ -- - - -- --' _ 1953 Blue Checker Cab Trailer ; - .. . 8054 ~ __ _0.7680 1989 Ford Bronco i FMCU14T1 KUA6088 --- --- - _ 274 L:16EVERLY~AUCTWKS.WK4 ' 11/07/2000. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOAR® OF .COMMISSIONERS . - REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11%13/00 Budget Amendment NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD. OF COMMISSIONERS - -REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION _ Meeting Dater 11/13/00 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMfSSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 11/13/00 Budget Amendment Consent Item #: 15.4 Estimated Time: Page Number: , _. ~ ' DEPARTMENT: Public HealthlSchool Health ° ;~ BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 01-0067 , ' ~~_ , ~ ~ . . ADJUSTMENT DEBIT `. CREDIT Public Health/School Health: ~ ~~ Cape Fear Memorial Foundation Grant $5,000 .. ` `. , ~ .: e. ~ Departmental Supplies $5,000 EXPLANATION: To budget a $5,000 contribution from the Cape Fear Memorial Foundation to be used for the School Health Program.to purchase combs and educational mater' Is for indigent .' students with head Tice. ~::.: ; '.. ~` ' '`' .,. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ~ , ; ".~: ~ ~ . ` ' .;; ~ ~', . APPROVAL STATUS:. To be approved by Boar."d Of Commissioners .' .~ ti~'. " . ~. , i . COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS/COMMENTS. ~~ of Directors Agnes R. Beone William H. Camerbn J. Richard Corbett. M.D. W. Carter Mebone, III R: T. Sinclair. Jr., M.D. Robert F. Warwick, CPA Louie E. Woodbury, Jr. Garry A. Garris President ' 279 Dedicated to Advancing God's Desire for our Neal/ng pnd Health. Cape Fear Mem®rial F®undati®n 2508 Independence Boulevard, Suite 200 Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 September 27, 2000 n C ~ ,~~~~I~s ~~~ ~?-' (910)452-Obll FAX: (910) 452-5879 Ms. Betty B. Creech New Hanover.County Health Department 2029 South i7ih Street Wilmington,.NC 28401 , Re: Combs/Educational Material for Indigent with Head Lice Grant #174 Dear Ms. Creech: At its meeting on 9/20/2000, the Board .of Directors of Cape Fear Memorial Foundation approved a grant of $5,000.00 for your organization. This grant is to help fund the above-referenced project. To.accept this grant, please have your Board Chairman sign and date , both copies of the enclosed Grant Contract. Retain one copy for your records and return a copy tome for my file. We anticipate the check to be mailed on or before October 13 ,2000, contingent upon our receipt of the signed contract.. With your acceptance of this grant you agree to use these funds only for charitable purposes and to provide progress reports as requested by us. We will attempt to make this request as accommodating as possible..' Please feel free to publicize your receiving these funds. .However, we would appreciate a copy of.any release you make. The Directors of Cape Fear Memorial Foundation are pleased to support you as you serve our community and wish you continued success. , Sincerely, G rry r s~~~ President Enclosures CAPE FEAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GRANT. CONTRACT Organization: Amount of Grant: Date of Payment: Term of Grant: Project Title: Head Lice New Hanover County Health Department $5,000.00 10/13/2000 12 Months Combs/Educational Material for Indigent with Grant ID: #174 J ~ • The following terms are agreed upon as.conditions for this grant: 1. The tax-exempt status verified in the proposal is still valid; any changes in the. organization that could lead to a change in the status will be reported to Cape Fear Memorial Foundation im~-nediately. 2.' The funds will be used by the above-named organization solely for the purposes described. 3. The organization will keep and maintain..records of, expenditures adequate to _ check the .use of the;. grant readily..available. Progress reports concerning ' budget, personnel and program developments will. be timely completed and . returned to Cape Fear Memorial. Foundation., The Foundation will send report .. • forms well in advance of their due date.~~ • 4. The organization will repay, upon demand, to Cape Fear Memorial Foundation the amount of the grant if any condition of the contract is not upheld. , Additionally, the organization .will .repay Cape Fear Memorial Foundation an • • amount equal t'o the book "value of any assets acquired through,a capital' ' grant from Cape Fear Memorial Foundation if acid when your organization is sold or loses its tax-exempt status. 5. The organization will send to the`Foundation copies ofFany printed publicity . . - regarding the awarding of the grant or the program supported;by the,~grant; ~~ the organization may, if it chooses,••refer to .Cape Fear Memorial Foundation's support iri any such publicity. ~ ~ . 6. Future payments under multi-year 'grants will be subject to .availability•of•~ funds and to satisfactory review of progress reports. :,,. 7. The following special terms will be observed: None ~ ., ' ,, . •.~~ The terms of this contract are accepted by: ~ ~ ~ , . _} . _ ~ n~ .., ^~ {'•~~ • i. -Nedv Hanover County Health L)epartment -School Health Program Lice Eradication Project Budget: Metal Nit Removal Combs $4,550 Educational Materials 450 _ Prevention and Control Letters Fourteen Day Checklist Alternative to Chemical Treatment T..+.,1 ec nnn DAVID E. RICE, M.P.H, M.A. Health Director . May 9, 2000 NEW I-~,NOVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 2029 SOUTH 17~ STREET WILMINGTON, NG28401-4946 TELEPHONE (910) 343-6500,. FAX. (910) 341-414b r u,r- ~...; , Garry A. Gams, President Cape Fear Memorial Foundation 2508 Independence Blvd., Ste. 200 Wilmington, NC 28412 Dear Mr. Garris: o~ rr..~-.~.G~ ,{` . ~, LYNDA F. SMITH, M.P.A. ; Assistant Health Director ` Head lice infestation is a major problem in New Hanover County Schools. Sixty-five percent of the. elementary .schools have reported serious problems with head lice. Seventy-five percent of the schools have reported students with chronic infestations. Untreated or partially treated students continually spread lice to their peers, families and, care givers. - /// Head lice infestation interferes with a student's ability to function in the classroom. Indigent students with chronic infestations repeatedly miss three (3) to five (5) schooldays each time lice are found, while other students with lice usually miss at least one (1) day per occurrence. The greatest difficulty in alleviating lice infestation is removal of the nits: We have located a metal comb that ~: is effective in removing them. Without this comb~i may take several days for removal. Some parents cannot . afford these combs. Also, working parents of indigent students cannot afford to take off from work to complete the task of removing the nits one at a time, so they don't get removed in a timely manner. If we provide combs to needy families, other. families will benefit as well, because, their children will not become infested. ~ • ~~ .. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this need, for,funding.with you. A contribution of $4900 by the Foundation would enable us to make the combs and needed educational-materials available to indigent families. A budget is attached. . r . tk ' ~ ~ ~~ ~k Sincerely, ~ ` ~~'~~ , ,' , F- . B~Creech, RN r , Community Health. Director T ~ t .. `, y _ ,._