The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda 2012 07-02New Hanover County, North Carolina -1 il-LI 1 /ij R r, "Y July 2, 2072 Agenda Mission New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow. Vision A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come. Core Values Integrity • Accountability • Professionalism • Innovation • Stewardship This page intentionally left blank. AGENDA M&A JULY 2, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC TED DAVIS, JR., CHAIRMAN • JONATHAN BARFIELD, JR., VICE - CHAIRMAN JASON R. THOMPSON, COMMISSIONER • BRIAN M. BERGER, COMMISSIONER • RICHARD G. CATLIN, COMMISSIONER CHRIS COUDRIET, COUNTY MANAGER • WANDA COPLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY • SHEILA SCHULT, CLERK TO THE BOARD • 11' MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman Ted Davis, Jr.) NON - SECTARIAN INVOCATION (Reverend Margaret Wheeler, Zion Chapel AME Zion Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Commissioner Jason R. Thompson) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Approval to Disband the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board as Recommended by the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board 3. Approval to Accept a Grant from the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) in the Amount of $287,817 4. Approval of New Hanover County Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendments #8 and #9 ESTIMATED REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS TIMES 6:05 p.m. 5. Introduction of Newly Hired Environmental Management Director Joe S uleyman 6:10 p.m. 6. Consideration of ABC Board Capital Improvements 6:15 p.m. 7. Consideration of Funding Request from the Wilmington/New Hanover Port, Waterway & Beach Commission 6:35 p.m. 8. Public Hearing NOTE: The petitioner has requested that this matter be continued. The Board will consider the continuance immediately after the consent agenda. Rezoning Request (Z -919, 06/12) - Request by Bill Schoettelkotte on Behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC to Rezone Approximately 37.2 Acres at 8704 Market Street from B -1, Business, B -2, Highway Business and R -15 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District 7:35 p.m. 9. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z -920, 06/12) - Request by Dean Exline on Behalf of Seabreeze Seafood Inc. to Rezone 2.48 Acres at 1026 State Avenue, 1068 and 1074 South Seabreeze Road from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential 8:20 p.m. 10. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z -921, 06/12) - Request by Joshua Mihaly on Behalf of Shellington Properties Inc. to Rezone 1.63 Acres at 7627 and 7633 Market Street from R -15 Residential to CD(O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional in Order to Develop a Professional Office Park 9:05 p.m. 11. Consideration of Including Language to Address Undocumented Workers in County Contracts Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes) ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 9:20 p.m. 12. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney 9:30 p.m. 13. ADJOURN Note: Times listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 1 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Chairman Davis CONTACT(S): Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approve minutes from the following meetings: Agenda Review Meeting held on June 14, 2012 Regular Meeting held on June 18, 2012 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 1 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 2 DEPARTMENT: Commissioners PRESENTER(S): County Manager Chris Coudriet and Kathy Stoute, Director of Community Justice Services CONTACT(S): Sheila Schult, Clerk to Board SUBJECT: Approval to Disband the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board as Recommended by the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board BRIEF SUMMARY: The Youth Empowerment Services (YES) Advisory Board was established by the Board of Commissioners on March 15, 2010. The Advisory Board has recommended that they be disbanded as the purpose for which it was established is provided through existing means and it is no longer deemed necessary; see memo that follows. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management • Increase efficiency and quality of key business processes RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approval to disband the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board. ATTACHMENTS: YES Advisory Board Recommendation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 2 -0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Chairman Ted Davis, Board of County Commissioners From: Wanda A. Marino, Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board Chair Cc: Shelia Schult, County Clerk; Bruce Shell, County Manager; Chris Coudriet, Assistant County Manager; Avril Pinder, Assistant County Manager Date: June 19, 2012 Re: Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board The Youth Empowerment Services Department, Pretrial Release and Drug Treatment Court Programs have consolidated to form the Community Justice Services Department as of the beginning of FY 2012/2013. The new Community Justice Services Department consists of the following established entities that provide regulation, monitoring, oversight and advisement. • NC Department of Public Safety's Juvenile Crime Prevention Council that meets bimonthly as a monitoring and advisory entity; • Drug Treatment Courts' state mandated Local Management Committee that meets biannually; • Pretrial Release's participation at the Quarterly Judicial Issues Meetings that provides a forum for discussion. It is recommended that the Youth Empowerment Services (YES) Advisory Board be disbanded as the purpose for which it was established is provided through existing means and it is no longer deemed necessary per consultation with the County Clerk's and County Managers' Offices. I respectfully request that approval be granted allowing the Youth Empowerment Services Advisory Board to be disbanded and move forward with an agenda item to the NHC, Board of Commissioners to accomplish this task. I believe this request is consistent with the manner in which Community Justice Services wishes to conduct business and be regarded as a NHC department that provides quality services to the youth and adults we serve. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 2 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 3 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Jim McDaniel, Parks, Gardens & Senior Resources Director CONTACT(S): Janine Powell, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval to Accept a Grant from the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) in the Amount of $287,817 BRIEF SUMMARY: Staff requests approval to accept a grant from the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) in the amount of $287,817. These monies will be used to fund a portion of the purchase price for the 33 -acre tract of land for Castle Hayne Park. The land was purchased with Parks Bond monies in 2011. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Provide health and wellness education, programs, and services • Understand and act on citizen needs • Deliver value for taxpayer money RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Accept the grant monies in the amount of $287,817 and adopt the ordinance for budget amendment 2013 -04. ATTACHMENTS: Budget Amendment 2013 -04 Award Letter and Contract COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 3 -0 AGENDA: July 2, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 2013 - 04 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 2013 -04 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Intelligent Growth / Economic Development Strategic Objective(s): Build / maintain infrastructure Fund: $35.5M Bond Department: $35.5M Park & Rec. Bond - County Expenditure: Decrease Increase Capital Project Expense $287 Total $0 $287 Revenue: Decrease Increase NC Grant Parks and Recreation Trust Fund $287 Total $0 $287 Section 2: Explanation Seek approval to accept a grant from the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) in the amount of $287,817. These monies will be used to fund a portion of the purchase price for the 33 -acre tract of land for Castle Hayne Park. The land was purchased with Parks Bond monies in 2011. On January 18, 2011, the Board of Commissioners granted approval for submission of the grant. The local match requirement is satisfied by land that was already purchased. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOVA, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 2013 -04, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 2nd day of July, 2012. (SEAL) ATTEST: Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 3 -1 -1 N rd D E nr In, Fe i r U J 1 rn Da n4e 1 2 230, 0 G o v ca r n ri,) e n I C e n D r i vc,�. So, i.,,o lte 1 2 0 Etx-Josed tind 'tw,o (2) (; of C'Orttract, No 4700 betwee,,rl tte North Gavrollr,ia Dc:1.1partment of Environment and asilo, Ka Park, z,,anov�erC r, It i (;,�, P A R, T F G, r ar I t p r c,, ic,� t QL ,jl: Re, awd, the Nevv IJ �otj,,)t fo Rlea,se [lave an authorl;zed' le-pjre.,s(�nta1fiv,e si eacti of the two ( 2) en0o,s1c;id documgirlernts ( oro g -i - "'S 1 . I I n 4.1 S i (I " a t u re re maq - �" u 111re., d , Retu rn the two (2 � o rili n a I - silb n e, d d ocu unie nts to I h e, f"ollow,4n 9 a d d ress wil f) I n 15 (M y ts; of re.vc 1, pt fo r D,A1'_tAR, Division of [lurchase 8"A" Attnll 1AN ndro, Aridre`�_%VS 05 Mail ,Semce Center- N'C 27699-1605, Please be F-3140sed ttiat, olo -work to, b.e� perfbtrne.*d urlde.�r this. qr-an't contract can take 1 1: pla�ce: untfl )oth the G-rapitee Ia!nd' Q Nwe executed th e; g rant , contract, FaLfItIte 10% r-orur�o the doc-utine.1-4.5, tor 1) t It) ?0 Y 5 't V ""; fr 0 r i, ,), ih%? f a r1t i V,L") I rr i y "; C- S% 0 1 t f'f? I I t C-') D 0, p 4a r , " vvf' tt ? dri:i� 'L tfa I o f I ll o ff ;i r itt a ct d g ra ot Coo L 5 t 10 L 4 1 ("1 ) `0 LJ 11 a v f2- k"), n y (,' we'-'�'s t 1,0 nt; (""), 1, e a Isc., (w; o i 1 1, a c t rte te a t ( 9 19 1 7 0 7' � 8 5 3 8 , 07 M AOV n dca A n rJ,r C11 %11 51 Purch,as,e and Clontrad. �; 0 T , % A ww Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-1 tl C North CarolifIna De vironment and Natural Resources D 7 Ivision of Parks and RecreatJO1111 Beve, r"I n P erdue, Govem, or Lewis R. UM', faid I Director Dee Freeman, Sk N" 11", r. W] 'I I "n NIA 1) a, I'l I C M1101", X,es,o till, cc L)iWC1,011 Of 11111t) SIL cotili,t of N"C%-v 1-ki'll'ovc-'r 1) O-j DI-I'Vel MINIM M, e La r N TT N, 1, D i i le, oyj sell!( Remitiv N-Ir', 1411 ttoss,., C]"Ivi Of the Ncii-th Park"rs lind Rk-a Atithot" r letter u,") k1r, 11',etj k -; g 0 RI'vis, ti,") t, i i o 1"' Ne wy 1, Li-I 1, t: ("0 v 4:, r �'el ghl-a 111 1"r )i u (li e K par (1, Reel, th". the 11 P l"Ovide O,1dd1tU)n,,qA da"I'J's I lout, 4`1 d I il iT 1. Pst er 11 lt, g ill i e, r;,P r, I I ind (tic N. C. ct hOu'vell the Couitt of New 1 Ljiio,v�4r la C "I or the proct�',-s I's, to m1i Part, ( I",")ENR ) , DENR w,11I Pita"11 two(,:ojjtr*-ict,1- to si" O'lecontact, j i'lil-'r's-011 6,,)v 111C i 4, 4 0 1 1 L 3,11d, It 4� , tj I grant, C - Ot s C i - .i� v C voil't Chter cle""c"wr 0(1 1111 both of tlie,� contriwt Dt."I"Nk. A I- e� p, 1"'Ll SCE , 1 t i it 1 vv of 1X`,,,N R Nv 11, J, i I i e i) !, I lie co ti (uacl s A ad retium a cop of the C"O Pit r4l"W"t to vou 1'( "pr vot"Ir files, I I I, m: o r', Li� It C 1" A I CH" 114,1 Vol r"ecei y mr cop of fllw coiatr., ic rl "i w�j C4, 111 1 l i rs -its to copuplete 11kis Pr "It") ,d t-)ENlt. 1"tc Coullit dirce yeL n i y o a c i- 4,,,*d is t 6 ` 3 (1112 ) 0 15. li'miv,-yvi i r cont rL VAR"IT" life" pial( F� ; t I' I ts 01"! ra ("e A, loc-al g owerninet & (Ov."I'MI at I'litist, finit s It s I ii ti, 1) P, i reed tk") r 11 t c,,) 5 () pe r - e i i "t lise's, ltelrntltij,7� enictit v ( the exp 0 � g J n st ru c, t, i i ipis, a vut � t t w� ar t") i i f tjE r, it, i e t, o p 11or -11 o Nve t If w.t have is , alu)w (,mir pro p c o n i a C t c I e, A n i i s, t ro n R x �� r � , J 0 919 7 k6 t 1 Poo I Cc 1-c A,nil"s"J' oli Rocm,'ivt i0l) R 0-4) LJTCQ�S, S ervice I Con S1,I] 1615 Pila''I Sei�vice-Centc t'lr Rill-flCigh. Nor th C,Orohna 27699,467:15 0) "K � V&V Pho,,�,,n" 919-707-93,0041FAX.,,, 919416-516 rk €��`��" = - -� = vsl 0 hterfl,�,;jt N". � 11 IT An Elro,11v -,51-11% R,, y A, f d 61T op S s M M" e ting mku 07/02/2012 3-2-2 C D 11 t tit L: I NO in tit! r 4 7 0 t".) S 11 N 0 1 1, 1 GA R", () LIN A LD. W A K ,,'� X X X X 110 3 2 at NO (", TO !!.!tia:tt:iliiitt LOUR INT 110 z o I iee 4"it lir: 4 M k 11t. 1, i4 FIrtyQ71 Sri Uscrii il'.irk too I I irojoxt): L utcl JUILD S i I Att 011"33, 1:5 110C I 1111LI ill thtjuil all Ill I W e (I st" VNIN F Nl,,11CJ) S Tl-,w Eirvirwinient rind Aliphiral "Deplantuill"") " T. � ,:.. 4i,l it% "Granterb"'o a to swinik; will tilt: wrillow. r it-oithrus, atimlitions, plans, spit7KOIC01111111VIA s clescribed in We Norh Varolina Parks iijitl 11,Z, L li 1 t I F1111d l I . 1 �'lcfillijljQjjljj1wj Fl,110- 11TILI I; rarlt :1 WK01 AM 111001V b INSTOWC 111101.10T it ,art or titc injuio w two, t: LAMIrild JIM 10,110 ' 11 W V (111 tj I e wi I it L1 it! I �) i %n i w, i ii i i o f Va ri; s i"I It (I [� A! rAll i 1111, 111 licit! i I Win 1 tit: Dept ri it it, elt it i id I lue (*lt it ritift! a N I : C& 1 o' twili 1% c- k„ dli.` Of NOrIli V. .. . . ... L"��i-i�l��(,�'ll'ifl,.'�,"�,I't Terrus and (7caulitioni aq WIN in -minolutient A" to t1tis csmlhavm, NOW 111LOWGIV, die parties herao do Inutu'.'alty 1w, e L j I j (,,,) jr ( , P , 1 7 t I , i 11�, Ow Deprinmenrit liervll prumi'sew, irp twonsicbradopi of the r uuitiwx�,s b 1 V §C L (7jVjlfjttj Upoll ext 4"Idivilt- it tilt! Grant we Ow vmllt al"ount !nbweih above. "1 '11 i 4; Gm ril cr, I V k " 1 I'l sx, )� to 1�-) tC r,� I I I Y i-Al I k1 o 1`�, i to t! 1 Inallage the kirl""Its in VILTIAWN deserT121.1 ANAT ill It chli x1d prolbsiolul lo'nitric,'r the j n(:'� J eo�t i"I'Ll rt, The paribs; to Hit; swunkri aprec; arul urArstand t1le ptivincill (if' tit(! swils s ill IS uIrilrow't i"', drl"�wrllietit Yn... ifl'��,,71,7 fl! 11 AWILI sobject it, the ap 11110111114111111101 awlihbilil Sry I i ri rl ' orl CROASAIS and 17bral r NIF N e °9 1 1 J� illust lit! nliai�,Aw�(] at WISt it WAS 1 (Jri,.'lriwe., T'o- , [w incitried dorbi iho, c,,o,Pwi*a pciicrd, b &K ill' tell I ud itt tilt: lor-alit "villivilion. and clescribcd in 111111� 0 ,11,10 j ect Scovi of this agreeinerti. iwitt�ttcd iinclim wulusliert citfivir, rNuxublil ot AS. ,n ri jro v, it r PARZ,Tli 1,5!11:;LaliCt! Jill hild 11CA wiJI, on 111k: Mir V1111k: !r Ate.. j 1t0 j )4:tt1j;ur tilt! salug pri: it ICST YOW 0111SI 11C tipt"In nil intlepericklit "l 11 a 10111sed apptaiwi- holdin a j; Wcrn[ (�r ��Ir, �I �� r 1 rt;_� it 11±11 OWWW"tiOrl h011 01,10 ;`s,.1'0,Ft1'l (ArOlihii Ok�' dto.tll �"ts to R.. 1 :llul ul I it zi t A fl, Appi"olNP�,,il (,A' 11111oulm t"m with rllv� l`)Vp--'.,L,1.t]-twl il. "I"he n i�4, to ll� dwulu 101-1 PA 11011 j tl i �ed I and u ith in t O;l ri's o' -f Or t! thil e t his aj n tract ® 5 i ed b i It e 1107 p a r! lit c! lit ri ad G in ntee, i tii, t,-,j t (I e r nuess willd usiz 3 h n ,n � ,: � I� tl 1. ,1 r � ,. tit shall lit: Invide ilt MA111 111C 1:01111ALA (IN:11111t:11111 t1fir, S�, Or uo& ti1xvni, rece�lipl—alrd oi i t i it COSIS WCUrTed iO jj�jr,L- rfi) r It x"i ti (,- o o f c) r 1; u t i d c r, i i s t: o it r I, a t 1111sojurs; r"i'l-ay 1,�rc N101101tual tO 11le A thllil, J r: , �, p;L , � S ( � i Ay 1 rl C r I ) n 110,11 1�e roxeVeNt to 111C. Depwirlinunt %viihin Atts1five pl tq;j r1figi 111c eir(] of Ow Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-3 Noirribc-i-, 4`,701) i ieriod oir twimran Akx(�, 11101, rcv',�tvh on g roncrullv i,rL,,c i-, I �m, c t! I (; 'c,c �,,l n. F _I II�el1 Knotulling stanchircis :11A prilwiples. Reands sliall he reirrilled th it pCIO'cil cif filvo (�) yl�,airi' folli"')MA111 projcd winpleticiri, euept tflii� reck"crk"'Is". s4i"""th lic I humul .= 1.. I[Wdod KAMM WILIKE;S WAT 110t NMI ,� i °, r ved. Al"] tit i n itrul sup NVill ClOarQ! show lilt! immixt-i- riffl-u- ck.-in"Irarzi, 4,111,(] 1 ,41 vct (("i Which Olve ore 11 TILIT Slatt! AtIft0l 1;11:111 jljj%O� J(i -ulil rads, cttfikl mtolills. cutcytol Sul by unte wi !"lrill I�'�r politiall lit ;'ti'-�%Cord a rice! Will Gelleral Slattitt: 1,177- I A H! G run we it ;; t it us tu r ch i tit! to 0 1 c DC tl PLrt in r In, 5A 11) SNI 11 U ill to midil (W t4c p r c I 's il ir ii ri e i a 1 rucowis. or"! ci,:ws diAboved, lit, lo 11w rdlitti(Je4l IIi, It 1 w till *7011writ (d alujil excC 1 1 1 17 L N 11 Ir t P l , W'L , Itlay licit Ink"I't,c f"rk url IN: worle ffic., %,villkolva wi cil" tilt! Mplultilerit. TIVIloll knot; of tb"-° ecludiliollts ill tilt- C11,11111,111-1,1"'b"I Olan Wit 11101 lilltiltot! [A) ljllt� j '1,r'c,), 1 L-Ct :]i 'Csticwlu ill 11 elelf ll (Ir. ;h1clitionS Cof itt: IAN % (jr 11t,ted 1("i extviltj tilt! emitt. -orlick- itiust subitht W writivi !, it lilt: (W i-cipicit w tit,: Derl sir tillent r st r ova 1. N I I I ILW-- - - i c _, L" - TC 'I lie urvillwc willili c,c,�,�irisfcitmvci tO 110 tilt il'110 10011tritaur arW !IS SLIC11 0:01 54? -5, [ 1,.3, n s ii %, v"i P'k t ii i let! l ie t A rn i K: It it i it! A r- 1 1w s it pery i f 11 v, el 11 (1 Ile "T 1, 1 c irsintun 11-CpHSE111% 1ILtj A lias, ior will SCCUre, at its Mull t!5% will perswinc,-] rv d in peribrinhi tilt! scrvim tincler Mis a Swl,r 'NI'lall 1,�v � = o r .a naza, 1111 tv 011C imy 00i,'Vid1lill It! 11111111011 i1 7N 11-1c Del) Nt I It t),- e, v t-, n t i I i e G ra to i e e. s t I �t", oi I k""': i"'I I ��i Ill, 1 1") 1-m I I ii f i I i e s c r% j c ct� "s I'. � t v 0 r I C, (,., 0 r; I r --. I" C I L I B„ V� r" :"s I'l wc is lim I e e-;,vet;A (-�f ;r n'", (it' ti 1 to d u ts witt d' res I :x) rui b i I i eq 1 11piv i (1 hr 111 i "HIC 5010011tTaCtOr A" to abidl: b tilt! slandards; contabcd or Oh." pTOVIA10 SUCIP WAINIMIUMI W lot) willow lilt! Gn-trittle IL) emlipl u tli tI w swu(Jacb, 011L.1", TV' Vl'�,-JCCS 10, AjOIN 51'.11C itirlil f�4)10�rt" ".'rudubAhl ocass to recor"Iis, C) o i In. n I I to ;, I L �ii6�;Jlr Uvcc, ufivv 0,rilcr 125-19, Dayborwarrit antl Sus OF CR P,"t,,Tt, 34) 7" :SATOIL 301 '7,,50, I'lliv a Vv� not w ult);WPjjrjlvj wilfl ;111%; 4:)t susperLdUl hV IN, Slatur ol Nurili Ciiwhtri It,nif sJull owt knowain Or &NI'M A& jiltc) 4111v trawadions vvit'It ii t iers�.,cr or g , i. i sliall wit willostitute k 1) CT 5 CO In C1 wtvi tit ilia: l ic r Obirl 11tilic, t� of 6ri� kov".411out prior, ,,"ipproval !I y i lue [")qp ri rr-Ot:PI t % ("kill !'Tit L I .A, (I r'lli fl N! r% I Pi t N WE)a n i el j s d ef ated li il it! G mHUT al; 11 to 1: J Ai��-j �Ai 111) V, I ff),r fl Ult 1 '10,sus 11AS twxyritnut, The, Deprowlent cioswurites john invin in.wrio ortint iowfurn Nhwa w; the Cbritrixt A A J ril i 4, 1 i.s t r ;,i t ("i, r I`Z,-�, r 111C LWORTIO 01, "1 lie Grantee a tow compl with a] , 1i stutte i-ir-al slarlitor pnivisio,�11's clanq1ructinil, him 1jQ AM 111111101jement ond Itlie eliviwiltrinvow buluT11 bUt 110t litilitI& jo then Q11tiaiwill ll , L�rr. 9 6 _ � NLYLtl 4 ON 1 59): Fo r ori" I ("t'ji-Or-adL, arul Putelivish (G.S. -14AQ6, 11-3 1 to !18-4174 (3.S,. (S-Ov- I (;,S� 1 33- 1 .1 G, S - 1 �,- 6,.,:) X , -1 i . �'Fi ., 1-,'1,'3 Arlicle ID GO, 1-13-48i MILI 1' 2 N: ill 1 P-1 cot' 1111cre-m, i'S", Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-4 'N'trtntivr -47fll 2 A KI it a �"-�Ltk -� , , "�� : i k b _�" --A, , t— � . . ... . ........ .. . [±' -,:'33 N C � Si tc 11 ti il Od c, cuic, ic ' S, it! S x� R'e fn' 11 0! 11`1 Circular A-8 • (4st Pthiciplus. IS Imcall Sutin :lilt! bution Trilull 11 mim rl lilt! thl S., "I'llo" 11 it [ InIA&S it !ILl4't)tkilltlt!t! Iry Me 1"R 3 1 ice Acl Ai,�� to penuit petAdic ;nuhrl ur(l S-Ste 1111, 1 ons'; b 'tilt! D tk'�' ahNAMAIM: 0011 1110 0 eA ft c r [ i r o ject • courtptctii,��vrr tile: Gniocc 11"I't 0C)MAILO Ittill"Ll 4:0110113 U1111 lit Icasitlucc It"'I A . SLOHIR 11 PART11 11S.Sistalice AS lit: declicaltsd ill iis. ii r1XreQ1&eI 2;i1t: jor be use r c c s 1 , 1[10,� 1 IL1111i Q 11fic cledication uAl lie rmi"led irt 11"Ic clec'i"I alitl lite l imptorl y Illa 111)t [we c)t7 Fit(,,, I lit, th wilce a to 111slintAil and Ito other 011111 1 11,40s. 1111111;1 1) Ai FUT & S OMNI d0l U 1 CII 011i t 01,11OVI 16"in u rv i ccli tQ plitylk mucyllicurl use lilt 11 111illittilloil F x6001 CIA- 1%V11111 451c 2 5 f Wier Dir GrAiritcyc agum W quirSt: win ill 1110611,111ilk lilt! 1,I;tJt! SD kill U) ripputt rep-Ar ;wd con(lition, :uici onsible imurn arici time, a to tfic, ®. 1.0 I C 0 1' L11 t. i# L 11 tO 1 11110! tilijil HINS SMciltIped x0i'll If 111c, I n"ject site ii",; Hie Grunice asyncs 1c) ininictiblel mitif W Depannifint cd Add 01011LIT0110, MILI I(P Itirike r lit A i1x8ri cxp'cI'I'5'rc in titcler Icl 1'estore Use and O criAlit. r L .7, 1 11 L' 13 '1 Iiie kirvi to _, to 4, R o t I o, d i s c'- I i I C I i I I ll r ® .1i 11 1 n 11 y 11,4� U,54) I I to FN I I I c 11 it 'S"i S' i'�') f" t l"I c e. 11 t: sc u 1 c5 r, I ®� at I (i c I a I 4o r n a 11 to , Iry s. to I i to fl J I I) in tilt: use n0my ('k,tcilfty aquir"ecl or I 1i 10 (� c" ei'� t'i [ c S' I, I I ;'I I i", v� 01) 11:0 MAIM 119011 FlOr %Will L150 any, it F i j i r o 1 ) r-Stecl [ 'I',] -�t : I s, 1 0, , 1 10 ) '11NI'll 1.10101S. 1110 upurnient %OM lobb %WltolIt Grimits, CPT ill, Subtler 01,111-11011ni:CO(S) I&II pay I1 priAm c)r Rurl-Oppropirfated hinds un or Am- I 111, c r ".7 21" . 19 8" " 4") d tO Will We q uariet 1 I'l-le use to!" k"JI[ if ititstt!ritil chi-itIv, tI-c-usur lit 1heir Inc. Wello it I I L 1 x! Tom F I FIA" 'ill 1 1,11 l" Tlc Groullee III,, unibiter�'kill 111IN111111c p1r,hony 11c c,-, pertalitute 4Ahtvj,tJ.-,Lk i ri t I i v u vs n I I 1 1; ccon t CAI C 11 lluill ur cause, lilt: (01111co, 601s; WISH in a Vinyl and pruper munner Hic urvli]�cr 1his Shall 111001 11;M! t1iC r t(J l C iril linjItc flnS h g rvlrk� ric�`Iivx too tht: Graidec cpf such ospiccifyin the rcanuis th,crecT in flum imunt, till! 11JI111tet! sliA lot! clithicd 'ir'l (cceive 'Irst suld a A twill 11c, J u1nipIcrov! ill 4,1l't 11c,""Irs the Saint: Tittii""'-� cc) lilt! lolal sery i( to S ac I I ul I I y ; ,I c r f )t ni ad It ::;I r S) I I M I o ta I set v I cr S (A t I te Flat rce ce r e %f I 111�i is coli rtAt c t . co-prulitions Set 1j)[til io) lin Iii r c; ,A I " I x1mirVIRSHOL! HIS wind Sil; Anill result in lilt! D ticc hit I ti 11 it! G'ui'l I"I'l, C�e Jr'-pc'h ft-Ir 'J"ItrOlc2'r 1 1111710i J IT16011 ni inurm, it, unLini"('14"I �4) i'll"J'Al C1JJJCJ P 11"I'Vided try bvv, tuntil s lirtle k7p�� Obtabacel Iry Se Natishuylion Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-5 101 PLU t Numbu 4700 Altt"".'Aadvll and 10-urculicill 13 33,2: (1 U,,xeci a A Ordes- I nc) I W It it i I it: WS 1, I:�'I' or, b 6"irl St a I e ky"'oQ', 1�' I ( 'k; „,. , ,» .,.�, ,. rw. vvilh the Simn an purson sawkin tv du busiricss tlw"� i-c-sp,,�mFic 61 fltk 3101t ('170111TOUCIP Mtest. 64 'iir ydi,-itir eill"lirv, 4"1q,-i'iitJwvlti(w ;tilt! ils rquits, that um arc wit aware disu any v �il r r" Z;ifif'i it. fit wilmyss d" lilt! Departinent :111L1 11W GIMMOC! 1111VC! wvvalwd t1le 01 ill thiplivalt, qvi cmis cof kyllich is 14:111irred lil v ull MAN! pluties. N - ----------- . ......... appairst lice ry rile dit, snid, nallip] rlw"' 1".1"10WH bNAVII 1.0 tilt! 10 bo Our perswi dumilitod A i.,11 who Areo IlIstruncill, tuld he (tir sh..0), I b w4 e, d'tl,,Iy SWO111 1 111? 111HIC mith. • 61111 fl"w" "'A�'b44errlews irl thalt (01" C-NOUNd 162 SAITIC 11.1'11' V, r OX Sall I hyte . . .......... .. . . ....... ... . .. Nu r 1 h (A I-0 De pa 141 ill toll It i 1% 11 F1112 111 :1 It it Sh I I Ill I-i'll (), C Secret'an" Yee 1"(11' Divishill O"Of Pqjttv[ti�l%_�' r '11ld sc'�.rviees' D Hvul or, v'ViAllhoriec,,iA A ,� c, 1 1 a bc "Awnwrap. heem.m Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-6 p ; J A jr U Lf !"""J"" I" j k, R r'l toms 7 F (3 Gen wal Souris ail d Con diticins G o v, F r r! I E n t i 1, i U n im s i n prj`ic�At-�id (c-iliv ® so h, or"t I Ih 11 1 a f c"', I � o" i q, • ri'l Will have Hie fulowdra ni croon k 5 Gr-nfr,z�x..-,1 A!',' dt,�Jir.irfi(ln,7s aru s thatt is 111a Solirup d (10irittiran ��,s (:A-,,Lw1pi,,A b 01a a d p n c iii u," A. 0 � I I'l G 1, 1 ca r, s It a b ej I nc,,, (,,,j r r x,,i r a t (ii.- 1, 1 e r e,, n twl�,,d in ME, covre!x-t ("A' IF!., badw r�l irdurks, pub 's,,: y I" Oliira.,r ur chical (Stale or bcal, deded' or, I ri -s l 11hu hul o a r a cc) rr. aii s s I; o n IAI f 0,21.;I L 1 C 60 u r,' 2, depa rhiterit, ault rzv t' r o 1 t"i c"mr (.� r o rr ��l �e � I D � 1" h Staflvf,� 0". cJ 1111) cc K 5110741 &SIC71 01 COHN o (i ll il rl pol 01 CA o of ,° C.• in Usis Con!r"i'u-1 0A, inivans Pits unlit k-A I i h f 1 1, 1 ; -,1, " I s e T f! 1 (10 (2) "Auxit' mums an evirkwAian d or In, r;J r" iv7,(w ravy, GO "Cerlikadwi of (Clorn rumuns a repod prov","ileddi h)t 111D A tO UIC Of thEl SKIN ONAEUM thid Mal cas 1 h at 1i e G r wi 1, ea ha 1.1-1 ('� r rt I ri g ti h r, 1i a tr� r a C, cl i 11 s; ", u dad It ;!"L"l oT lull iNvi crtri !,,,i A ar i c!o" o e� t i b rr-1 I 1 ti,r p; r n r1 eto, r p, r t � r, Slate rila;,ntovned b Olt; Statee and I.Cusal Govellullon! Fjruv,%,w, A�, 11(w ell (let viale."' e�,, d iti -1 vo",li to assio the Imal awflor h dunlif pi.ro�r-jl-i'l c.,;oolliplianLr;e'� ren and al"idd f":,'Ir 11, g rec renle n is "C'00',n,Wt" MUMS J 10 i's us"kad It) iind :5 U r a o, EQ PRsual Year" mevarris, ti'm iiirrinim! • I go ar of 11v (7) Wnwincial Assistance' nica-71)s 41",ssi , ii floo-- receive wr admiruster 1!"�l I rl q 'tillbsidies, klstirai-irxi, fz,�,od yr . � ,,. �, a p p ra a W ri s , a ri c r lassIslawe I n a n C i a aorr�ounts r�2cze�ivad iis, a s sistan ce r lt;[ t1 m,:J ild, L r ' i , - tj � � '1, - - � i,�, s I a r p, q �' F s ro , ,,, t I r , "j,1jj,1,urd 1w sceivicc 1 1 I - i i �i u E4, to i c.a r e�- ai r, t;; ,,, ✓ c 7 �;ci �i n I �i,, v", �% i �, 1� 'd d s rr. n arbal a r-,,I ti. ril" rnu rin s in, r P r 1, d i ii Fdolve Al, a e c,,J a n v 6% n girt pL w an WA ninva Iii j; Muir or stib-!g r r ee 101 CA," 1 cli[ ,, a i r an 1 c) r, a lt 1 im ipy, involvenient will th;o� g railterl ur . » I ; t ® i r �I �, �, 1g }tt A 11L• p,*"-1 f, 0 �7,1, r I a ri ("'i f 1: [", g ni K y. ds Gralits? has We meardri iri Cj,13 jj1:j.t3,:Qt)): jF-1 � stirs k�,,�,nhk thal at g rarit of Mwe WrXt,41 fran i-i ! , tale, cr irs'llulion tut tjoes not incAwic; ari nor -Statio. stib i,,o al;dvt i1,,r,,.(,J atnCr r0jK01J,9�1i 11021C."10,ANWITAS of the Wuxi Gavernmuni, Caummi�ssion Fcr,�x� oll"',oar, l,�l IJ-JS� Gi,:,Iilract, 'Grzimtee,' Sliall rivain Me eritt identifled ass .a rt e of We 1 3 a r 1 i 1 � e, r ietfa, ,J!" (,l r tl r"j, s o,, s o 11" I Is am- [,,ul 1: t (.1 r z:'I f"') "! Q, Trleians aii C,!"Itl Mot pra Ides amaurue's, g enerod i " y 'fir"lanci"A. to .'an I htir eiflit xll ardt%r, ro 11 S pwilk e d • A fir'rr ri . c p-,--irtnarship,, v ev r ri r ne usurity, UK! 19 1C)C4,11, 1 6x, 'l r, Y F p k� r F .; 0 n , 0' 9 1, ""f- r, r P Of , 1 -si n (Y") 1 11 C 1 ri Atutarn 1 :3) TOR hol has 1h rile'Allito "I": tiJ 14 11 - A 11"lat is rot a urn e L"'If ar a hc-,xcuAj,1' g oi ri Ill 4e or'i 1 ;'i'l, Whod s mar c ul a t 1 ) i a n a 11) corpushun and (A) loquelaks on an arox3l rer,iorv,Y', c , r7ryludt�ctii,! i",veld lnt� accouadin S nN fd, [ �),Fjrt (,,J thal t� arl�A aicvau"11 flfi S of ,,,i tinit I ii1i cjivirr i,"n r"il ri n 1 e A ki d t' ni e wi s a n 0 LA EJ 11 1 It zi t i n d ij de s a r rm I an 1"I o r, ia, r o I s p d cc I I, [ "!AI'auco -,4�A I i lbe 090 "0' ri! Frink! r;i I n,,,, r S), t ;ni I in,,� r d 14) a 6',a 1 A p p r 6 i ri I 11, a ij), n Fj, a- !,i-1,,' "i, S? a 1 e a c outhorin flits of a de rt cA ." f ) 1A b 1, C fur for a (111) 10tv Flu rid s' ril e a !I s. a a i r d f r L I i 2S d', ;),$) 17" r I �'l e"� d 1-1 to . C n a enval Awernbl (;r cz)1hcx:tt!rj I, 11jec 0 it ti `5 Inc.', J , ra tr 'I It e.� ii 11 A i r s, r reel ci iw,, L� I,,af r ed t n or - a I k r, 11 I 6 s Br Ili arty Inu other cl"41?!� lk�a 11,11,13. S. 1 4.3x,, 2 (h), Ili tv larns Stale g r ail I Mad sp amn-11 SS 1 i"• r z�i ii I s d o n a " In c 1 o d e a rl Y pa � r o,' �, r A , ri t , q, t b E �(�rt' avid State Par Ica! Plarl, ror r t i c:,,, I ral p rc.! ra r' s, lurs"'; '11"lo, rr, I!,l G. S. 106 2 erAil tlloat r �ilvus a g rarot of ',Zlate fdr,1�1145 1 6, ( I . ( eS ' cof t w I r wil a n (el *1,1 e'? k� ra"n riol indids on imn-5 avu--, eritil tho,, ja bfilt 41 "19 cj c� I l"I 1�r r0 rt g ruq u � F'u, ll I S (3 1 1 B) 'Uri i: at U Ilais Ifite, irl GA& 1 4 in Ek 2 A rtiumicipal the power It) lr.,,,;),v umnsAdated w mi n l as Chi "'i �'l b,, Q B A I I ), a n d W I bv) a r d s, Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-7 I 1 -4" E'� �, "; 1, r , -�l r f n ri i i,.,i n r ,,, i r p c: r a t,-j ri ,,i R o I ntiil o:n, s 111 [p s io f t h io, Pa rt'i �o r I ii ri (v F 5 w, ri d a in 1, C l� ti, 1 r r l-, � e cn �,l i �, �ri c it I It en if o r r r C c; 11 f t h i as. such shall SO vovt :,.11 1" r, �rk, tpc) Y � re"'z", l t)c zirid for tha suporwWori d its Ttlu G f 4,3 -2 i2l f 6 rItS 11 ill W 11 3S , 0 r' 15 "1 1 S f�* c,", aft, 1, [1 w I'l, wpumv, zill ill llu,'�, Sub-corltra"ClJ11 11"'(7) Rill Ctmtr act wwA to ba it"itJor mis conhact AMA lrwolws tho 0,;,ill &'xpe�l.ose ot itic, Gravilem; ar his sarriploptis, lhoe (',3�,4anteu# firm obtaziels i',1 of llho� A CoriluEt I ri� I h o 111krit 11W SlAkorilruls, Wr "lil Cr ill! of Me munnews or actinhus t",p this axilracT, ( �i ) i s? :Izzct I", cl��, c' eA c'." f a 'I o 1. "1 a 41 u 1 i a s a ii cl r e s pa n s i tj i I I i c? s p r c) v ki ii d i ri, t �rl i c,� c uri 1 rzc I b 1 NY3 Su bicor-ll ul C: Im r,eos- to 13 IS cla I: Y 11 el, SIDriclarzis ip.x luvrivin or it) w avide, k."awh irif'orr"w�,il;i"04pi In Slow the (Wardae 1c) rorn;31 VVilh (p resprCAMIAlivify re,) arl romordu 1 wrilnerit to 0, rdo 135 a subcorilrWAS Sulti- I tw, Gr�z:iritcu has Hic rasporuRA",dly to eris-,Llw 1]"iciA all it wj pro�idii all (,3",tMeo to corritk VwO'l SO fOrth W 1101.511i A is 111 it r1i ce, n i: awnw; r-iol, i"vssi the! Grarwicks cyr 1hu Gronritmes right la ruxe.:ve HOWIPST, 1.1 P C,11 1(',3,,r an tools urrateri , , pr, irl s s u r, 9 p, rc:, h zi,:, n a u", o r i 1 )% I I I el A cem r%.- tv�l ii, y (a) %warcl j )a y rn1n[ RD 8Q o i on r, n I i t y el ; s i !; ri M in! t I y i to G i a W v WCAUT! 431 pursori or ww'[At nis a icy 6 t p !1 o r i !t, it,,oi,, C3 i ,� r il: n 1: (,,-r co pl Y rl'i rit ez, un,,J` action iJotes rir c:lt (Ahu Mari Via Graxilcle an"Ll t[ 1� t.j �-i si, a f o r� ul"�� E., t,� t, 0 f I " I r a:c'10, r 1 61 1 , i q il I i o n s; Suldichries: Exit "'; , r, p this Coritra,',61 lo tho Wiridd of arm, is, uip.-,io lvwwo r I I a S h (I r a I C) a ful ihc; 1 r� A. e �,-s I v es S u cc En L:; 1,) r p F f,:.,--s �s ", �r LAICS-00Dd D11d 0 Milt thel cui,,j 10, n s of th i�s, Cc n I ract t'ivriil �� Ugh is ct r".e hjill li to S urrn:h arc Yrictj resavesd to avA 111c, 110, cy (Ij Swim. Nothirig j:Cjr&j)jQjtj irt tkiis dcownwrit shaill g 0t; cir Wic.11JAV I t 11; tilt! 02 x pr ess inlcril;,cml, '1:41 11-ir- A�, ?l i i 19 ' c� r) c arcl y ITS pirsori roccivari svincu; lrb�r 1,:r(Jk,��r Gc"Fl[ra-c't is z,ji n i ri C i (I �? r ki! all" r�% ,�.'J ry I t r tj o, m.vi i h c a t i o n 1,ri cwt Rof gri d1,a ag party by - "I I , S'e, � -% a 1hiul 01.11 Of this u,,wrar.J, �f! 1"" vitv) ci icl J IM SO W the CROM IS, ko�r, &Jc�,nse of ihel, cl, a--irtt, iqa n di a r 4, `bm'],[�., pto-vill"Ll"A �a pirkirt i."itil ne"'A �Wvako,,-e, c4h et part �.,ove r i u �i'rl It of !; 010;sr r.Ln TJ-v(N, p,�) r r w 0 C0 W"t; u 1, r 11 can, C 11 o th i! r (I v to r ; -,,Vro r 0 p N Zl! Q h 01, Of J ri t 11 a a in ri t th () y c i� ri n r, t to, 111111 thED", (."11'. co�, of Tv"*" 17 in ir mil 1 ni a 1. 1 to, r�i b 1A u t ua I C 0 a s e rA E 111t, io r ,p, rt i-i-! ii y I, r ni i n i;i 1, t 'T 71 H -l iioliw in whin frorri th, _ , 11 V ) 0 1 , y ( � , 0 ) �: 'L ta 9 t e? ro W JXV ty, 11 Hild 6% n I, W I US 11 W Or U ri ti ri e 'cli Scuniords arici olhm mahrisis, tit 11u; vipAwn of Me Apanc shall tx submMul to th, Aguricy. it Oria is a 5" p r 0'v i t! E? CJ tic,1610, Mei Grantele! W 'ir"l ilrnouvrlt twars IN; s a ryi e ortilir,-� lo, thu total ccrkq.� 1,1'1 i; p-LI S, i� 0 11 a s, ve r! o rui u cl i Lit!"'ar, lo Hic! latal S C'J trv;2 F, a rt, t L" c; c"'C:# �w el r, e,,. (J ti y , I h i s; a warrio ri 1: 'for, us 5i I s af Ywor hk pua r I -L,,), r r i - ,i e b $UbCQr,)1ri,;1,rJor!S, for Ow pr�o44i,,,;,Jo,,d flus such uAmv;riIwut�, hi-i,,vo as, J'ie,rir.Lin,:,, f Cl t U il 1; 111 u !, 10 , ,1 Y c I a CIV i C a 5 rk, La rf 0 r)"T1 -0 cl VVII o r 1) c ecl M pf�--", :,T1 S a, 1" i ro, r) `0 S bilsed on ozic-t-1 01 (by 01 S(?PV1G(.,j[5 [ess pii,, 1,5t(twit tit n " C j) [I (I Q4 t"llis in ol Wa pa io Mhich, fit, is e r'l't i I Il P,� F i 11 110, (LAM11 In UrTictl ant! proplim urichr 1his, 1 the lk Ihmumpan has Wo ri ho tern"fl,flatu MIES coll[ract LN, g ivirt g writum r1olice to Wit; Grarlwa rl,,nd SINSt tho rowsror),, and" lfwe of su,-,cl-i Ofevelive 1:111to theireof, ill Will al.i�vit r li J L! ('A 1""I t"I !"J"I (�, rA datil, sluchads., sur-vu,�p, rumfols, p ho 1: ro h I rilp.1 5, �-vrlll wports j impared b Gr�i7iol(m , at lhic,� aption of No rxi IN A arwJ 1:1,1,0 G I c S, e q 1 it I �!!, ("J I t") rt�, r: Fi i,, v i w, s I a n (,J 0,:�, i t, Ai 1, �, A b I , L4 ft"""'r, art w, rk cornplate(i (in, such documor1h; anci other Flull(wrials, 1 h o Grarilus is riot to;Vy,5cj cAl, liot;flO tc, CfjL A� lfcr b 11-11� A, lv virima of m bwach. of this a aricl he A 11 a n c y a )-- wS t h h to [J 1) ay w,� e, n I I o 11 �e G-' r a ri 1 to (v W r I h to 1) U r ru s (e d sul uff uritil st"Ict) 1',kl'izo as ille exaCt 4".11"rKILIMP 04 (11,3ME]IJIS tkf! from SUCh W(Mcch uri b-2 Waiver of DOW& b lht A of an dIAL111 Or bruach in compharim wwrh Me talms col thiis Lj is nj 9 "": (if ari dlc,� or breach aric fis ,noc�t C"I c",f lerms of this U,n1roc,-.[ k,io[ess tm)' $Gd'l in tv 1111 authCRUICI C)l tIlEe Aguriv orid Iliq AvallaWfit of 170110:0 P.,."Iffies to 11,Ik" si,lirlls in� 1)"I�, t I ni d (�7n'4i fit"I "!I "d 111 a 1 th p rt"wl rl t (3 f 111 tth, L L, cr.,"ur,lr,a,at i S depl��ndonl, and avin upcon aric! gib tc) thil!" ii), r :ip r,,c%, p hil, ai t i ati , 111 �,h ;n , ta, rt, 11 a v d 0 @ tod I y, o I f u r-*,i i I s f ro r 1, [1 i ss, p i .i r r :�c, s e-� !o th�e Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-8 y , i 11 f 1 f t i r t .Iy ""Irly Ps f i 1 n T 4" 8 '+ � v! i T S n x A g% � h e� ,e 'N, @" � T A }F � LY I I ;J 1:1,03 t 4 � � I? IfI t f Go'S, Survival of' P"ronvises: A"JI p.rc)r111,,Sx,-,.,S, 1,, N, INn (7 CI 17 0 11!, F) te I, n s r_�, s L7. n r�al,ri e " 1 ' I" a ri s, II t cr ri- dater, ui, S s p e c I r cq� v "I'v, ,,I cl T"t I Or Ll"-ILS�!S, ZLj f e r c"ir, NI to 11 act ual Propert R 1k, [its I copyhghts aj'W owil'of,511-dip of Dclivj�,rabluxu; y 'h i r i t s I P, s tj n f uc) m v� c:,'� r F. I, j n i, ot r t r (!:4, F5 (,, 11 to, ffti,,j, 0 G I, I c', tt'l y t L"-)" • t t ri r -i I i a "z ti r I c I I i D P, ."i r n,-11 e 1"I o E, I t, i r c nie ro ,k, i t l�, c: 1"I S e r o �,Ki I„11 1, (if vv I k� a i r r i I e 1, f or, al 13 1 o kM1,,11 I I I n"i ru, n,� t [I I p 5, G vl I. Conip,[Ian comn'th A, p plicable Laws i "I r'l o i e c o ri r ct w" tj 11 r, zj,!��,l Itt f o JV ( 'o"if, r"It -!I] IC C1 1 1 L . L L " t (j u r i -, "I 'r 111 11, s �:'), �N. 1�, 0 (J ej, an,(J fir"W" ' mumu�� ro�, friul or" • Rocorrcl Roent i on.. lo r �ill�"17(21'01, n1i'l I-int c!',ec0, !, (I s p (,,j se, of reco Ihc express "w""Ithein cconsew. raf tNej A ' , v r o F ("'I S, I D b u r, c,& 0. 1 ri i.-�cd I c, F a- IT; I ril u M o I �1 v 1,,!, � 41,111 N., y ", or I'mill al" 0 71, ,7 i3 I iD k n c 5 (,,mc %aot i , c h I I s o P , ,_ • 1;,;� eww:t 11-k@:,-, and rE." ions. 1 01. 1_� c 11" f! t r) ti cl Z"IF, Lx! !orl thivi f;vi� vc,,.,o0n::j,`I' r N 4 rs I n' I i "!, I, I - 1! i 1 a n ic";x".1 thlrcw c,� t, Ni 11 r, Z ko 0 n, n, 11 f.'rIiA Fn��,,oit)01 1�"z_!,ti,114w Ri� z" cnvt I,trlre�� y �,),j I S, I c) 1-1117, the c� FIeder,fl g , %, u L �!",] I Ls I o" o o I a I t� v i tA i I" q, a 9' ol[,,,ot at&AJori Is It haaS S 1, cj 1 1, Ex"Il, belcrc�. ex lc%], 1, h", e Lin p r i o (:J (te s i t�;�ecl i"i tx), I t l'St. 1 S, I I III III s 104, c"o I e t i'll i �tl i_N] P.Al."Al ol 111 a ai r 1 10 n C) r, r"J I es cl I ii J D [I co a t1le EII r i c� I u I I,.,- e 'L. r ' �'j, n g E! 1) ' 1 F& hici v e I J' aiv, tt",No vii �,] 1111 D111111" �Xjifl f ec"ec",rd 5 01 virl, d 1111run I m c R c c o ( d's Tt"ie G f 'L #9 1 jwi 01 0i ciact-i en vrfll'o relce�i6oin vo ii IN c 0 to B ci r a,r "'cor(b k10 1 '11 appfo;".vi c J, j j 4 �, "A, I WA r ; � L 1� Corn plia acc, ith Lawsm T 3 1 , r, J o 4 �i a S 1w il (11 r ji i LJ P, cl 117.1 c 01,711' s C O (J PI! S i I "S, si, 4""A c"I"'r, 1: '1, 0 c: 4c, ni p I n c (.1, th Lail %; 1 ""1 ,�,i I f I 'hid 1 u A rip" 111 "r,""I fi .�71 !H i j I Cj I j r � 7 r)j J -1 t1,17 , 5, "u` -::�� d�� s +'� �:� , 1�1 `)" V1 1, I'll L", s (I lc� n a o r , (I I " a, u th c, n 1 41t L `1 Y ity lo Dit',!, ,P; Emplo Oppod,kin", ed v_�! ii I uUL 1, 11 LA I I �u u tL,J 1,,(JHrI1[.A1H11"PA '01 '11I� k:K!UJ',d1 64,,U' HE L. I e� I c! ernf,) C),pi I u v IN by Icv,00", flIc. Gri-lrilvc�"Lclr S Con 1"I (jonli �1, 1, Ill ru I n d-r-c",tj �i P I �,Jj c rl 1, 11, j M A a rl, irl (o �vjl i I I il`!1711,� R ("I @ k iri!,Iru cf. . ve, I� Jkzx, nix �ntr c r�, F p d, s 9 i v e n :�,,j co, p r e p a.,,, r I Nerlitdl�(: I' I",: 11.1,11, (11ir" rc zi S., s 'It "d I �`j 1`,'? ( al,Nxi (I r,,,,ot 1"'I "I i" throt"It, prio- % j, n (I I �0% 1, 0 0 1 `7 1 ,7 L ac th at "i"") v a, cc,�, ) e cn, r c Y , T B• ra,�, i l il.-Nei 11'$, j � j' , 6 4 S ' L e:cc�r 1 " 46 n a ri r r 11 r c� hi G g e, 11 r I l,'] V ira;," I .,I it "NVI'l and In o t 11 rl I ip r, (J's. ccese�! s'"m oc """ c (�,� t a, S, JeJ i r-i 11"i �s C c: r i I I, r-.vL, '00`11 tolri �?i , p c ' -v 1 1, 1,7, e A q "liv i, ct �J, r� r 1"1 n" E= it v jr EI W A n e n d tilL 10 11 It S cont rolld i. , 1111 01 11 ct t"!'k. � an1(!FI(jc J k [I Ij 11,19 MIJ11 1 19 V0111 I'll -I turIi rid, N. uld pi.,, ,, c; r rt,,: i't n ct,�, Ar �j x O'cu !:xy d" 111 c r -, 7, cxi r Lap, r'oel e 11 t L) I I v - S e 4 njn(,J th pa r",a n! Sery e r a b I 1 71 t I n tlut e,, rit, ttmat a coi,,trt of cicrnptent t of th i's Co,',,n1ract 1�c 1, 0e, ,ii"i y u h0d,3" p i: fow�,,'J Q711 C) r' U CA" U rT i �? 0 5 .I Iimo�, ca, h 'suctl p T -wrovis cm or r u rE- I n e (I I si .-,,t:,�n 11;91� % to bu" [c_j 71" ext(�oit `,t, n c� t ",j vk,)1' ho;-i of o- is ro�,O 0,' 1 "d 'A I N o i n h 0 0 ("N', S".0 on, ia c JILIMN I ru, i!;:; C "n, 1:,,�r a c I 's 1,,!� I • I I e n, I a", n. i r'l t il ': I to? cu"", "I I , • " I I H a a d-in g s, 11-ie-i ha''LlAdings S,�' `ai j j In the, t e n a thou �i it airpe riot ,un ii OF I 411� rtloury P"�,Orh t anid S 10, u �Nj b, tr.) struie 1 11 e� r'n e� a n Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-9 CO F? N R 071"ant 14 01 ,'l T i ni c"I f I 1-� f 1 i C pg Carci W Fimpart Tho�, a 11111t it is respalsitbe for Mcs j impar cuslod arid inf ti,) it State owiwl propert Y lurnnhed 1-16"n for kisf' , iq,� W.' s c sort! r a ct a ri Sr 11 re-, , i c"i b u r s a I h ce a t q r I ts, ` o s s c r a ril z i 13 it , T aw-11 Ex"piconew All lod-,:�-, rl 9 ar,m('A ocist wooll 1r-I-;'-1',Jt"-, excess (if 1011.1, contrk"'Ict iri(tc:c ill akc Oiw Ccc,n Irit:,rtor m ai(l !,-w re) W I h� 1 ria, vf.,�] lQo"I 1'.] g j, "mid rl so ralcys eslathslied irt for c, ,J � � r °yp¢ ,� � C a tit § �rl a, kim x eo,, n c, I I SalesfUse Tnx Fitshinch: 11' elli °a i (-",.rantc�e, and a.l -sub. Horlh CM,"'irr"A Fit FZ o ve n t i c? I r a r e f ur cl o f a s; of cr w; vi, zi d t i � , v% taxon padcl b Hann In the perforwarce of Phs Contraclo p U r 5 IL,,' "I �r) 1 ��, 0 1�3` awi (h) excTch) all r of u nd MAN mile s aw,1 tt,�,,;fct [a lhrc rl �� i 1 1bxc1Jc-rci to experism we witered at their reindarsenw! rpcits Scior Cos, ard . ,.,rt. � � - ,:. y, , «,., n -x 14111111 ancl Services, jusht"c"e, and 11 P r ce,.�e n t t o ri, Transpforl,afion, an(I Ific; cit Govemmi. T No v c, a, I:,., o r, I r at l } w Ih a. 1; cn,., e rli I'll e I'l t j 2), I-i za v e, pe r1cuim"') d t "i in 01I e r s �ti c h a w n tra cl w Ui i n 1 h a p ast S F:c)r addilial-it,:11 ro,M,iori ""'rug tf'w,� arld are torlawoura to F x f,� r i I I., I v iv�] ri I c,,h r .2! 4 an %, I G � S' So 3 3 -, 21,, 2 Ordor :111 An sir ivtqolloc,�,x lh d co- Sta t e A, g , n c P,,,5 z - A n-i(,,,�,A I prohiblioris of lhnl irripk,?, f I c r 7t E W" t�t c ""I"I I" I 1� c 0 r e" r c,� a r cmilralet M-5 6 or, ShOLAIJ centact Wher, State, A uto i,:Jooleonine I f 0 � "i -c!, so i'i'', e, it r,7, { 'c", Lei we iv , rr� F ,� 1" e�ori E *ceca,� U 1 iv e C- (I ei r 2 .1 1w wwri 1 s In Ii e (G ra ri ! m way not I a awarij 0 1115 C (" rl r f a S in to nr: of a :IV newes releasci cr anj Vim is in E I F? a q c I a d 11 at Al 6, r". "Ple criswers lh.ar ia,] :`; productm! oil: ii reishl cl US confr,:? r n'r-JIM c, Sav c rai rl hilril uniit of hu A y d i I L I wva au , t s s a v I, r e; jj r alwourfl b corwin PAC) this corlrri,11 fid,',f 1 i I y 1 I 6 F ir onq de (I [": I )A.v v.- '11-1 c., t tQ y on IN'S ct"I itfi"",id Gratijillew certi and wariant mat nr) ',��s or cc,,,n1Wperc l cl� e�, If S) L 0, (:i! p j i d i !,,,l cvcv,,, n ','A e ct cv� n, 1, h, t h i s co n 1 r ac 1, n c) r a r c; a ri y lees n gifis ar olher n1wWo, oc i 1 7 ir, r E 'I h d c f I! I i s cc , t rz"I ct, Lobb lhe, (.`;r ar=il ee certifies lhNzAt IF f a ) ha's n, d k r u- cNcl ni:-,ir vijil an approprialed funch MY tc�,, 1obb ( h ) row tht"o r"litr1mve"', r3011050 A t' 9 !L i'k" j ro n koi0ti labb Miorli Me Grantemp2l isr RS SUSlifir F ,rvhl , s "or uW1Q hVICIS an or zfltt� r 22. 199% and (c) w We L LI , r) f [I y , i �i'l s I f r i 1 a I (v r i a I tiro k1ri i ;"I c I. r 1,,' n 1, 11 s e, B Execulive Order 24, iss ucd b Govoo mor Pard oe j , ;vd NAL 1:1.11,1 USE!: it it; wilaywhil for an mencdow or, cm-Itmdr r ( 69- 1:-i i d :1 c r (wirracla!, ca ri s t r Lj c ti, n rnz,, av n d 0�"rf 0 1 �ek! e)� ri wa,� 1 !i c", n (I a) r , I a n cl b r cl , a 1 f e r (,",I r, �c�� I r si,"'I'lox-, 0 r') t"'r, ach) ro, re ph ar ti,vc ) �Irl F0 � a 0 r �-, y 30, 1 t I ia, G crw e r n cW,,,s, C ii ki!' ll 1:'no"I publ,c Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-10 Aft�a, c [tin,,i, n t, REM I I Nort[i, Carol'na Division of Parks and Recreation ;>a r ks a n d Recrea U o n T rust F u n d G ra nts P r o ra m fb r Lo ca I G ove rn m e tit Graw,itoo: GO U n t T'Itle of" Project,-" Castle Fla Pnrk Ac Project Nuniber- 2 0 6 9 6 oj AmountofGrzant- $287,8,"17 0 nta & P e rs on f o r P roj e ct"-- Juii t cDanle[ T D irect o r of Ra rk s, Ga rd e n s , lan d S e n, 1110 r Resource Co(,,,int of'Newfrnovei� Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 3-2-11 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 4 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director CONTACT(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director SUBJECT: Approval of New Hanover County Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendments #8 and #9 BRIEF SUMMARY: Funding for the Hoggard High School HVAC project was approved by the Board of Commissioners on May 16, 2011. The New Hanover County (NHC) Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendment #8 - $182,000 budgets Public School Building Capital Fund ( PSBCF) Lottery Funds for the project. The budget amendment was approved at the May 1, 2012 NHC Board of Education meeting. New Hanover County Board of Education Budget Amendment #9 - $401,334 was approved by the NHC Board of Education at their June 5, 2012 meeting. This Budget Amendment records the close -out of PSBCF Lottery Projects that have been completed. The funds that are not needed for these projects can be approved for other projects. The savings from the closed out projects in Board of Education Budget amendment #9 is $401,334. Budget Amendment #8 formally adjusts the budget for a $182,000 action approved by the Commissioners on May 16, 2011. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Support programs to improve educational performance RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve New Hanover County Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendments #8 and #9. ATTACHMENTS: Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendment #8 Board of Education Capital Outlay Fund Budget Amendment #9 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -0 COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -0 Now Hanover Count Board of Education, I Caphl OuUay Fund Bud Amendment #8 Be it resolved b the vlew Hanover County Board of Education that the fbIlowin amendments be madi-� to the Bud Resolution fbr ft flew[ y ear endin June 30, 2012, on the 1 st da of Ma 2012: 1 182jODD.0D Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 4-1-1 = 4 �� a l" I 'l l k I Capftl Outlay - Pa 1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -1 -2 Mew Hanover Count Schools Bud Amendment Amount Ouq et Code Descry Lion Dr Cr F. 6 95.0 , 342.945, t 2 [� gard H AC 1 82,000.00 .0 6 Lottery Revenue 182 r Totals (should equal) 182 *OO Jueffication f6r Reque Detailed entry for CO BA# So S ignalum ofRequester Approv tdjWnWWMt or Designee Date T be compl by Finance Bay By: Date f 'r ,I 3 q? I I Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -1 -3 0 New Hanover Count Board of Education CaPital Outla Fund Bud Amendment #9 i3e It resolved b the hrew Hanover Count Board of Education that the folldMn amendments be made to the Bud Resolurion fbr the fiwal y ear endin June 30, 2012, on the Sth da of June, 2012: 777717771i Re In*Uctbn cepftal ouda Techndo Suppol-) opemamef Support ( 40�1,333,. Yj NOW .&*neond To affisid bud for W" W "ON oil TOW Awmdettion In Cment Bud Amount of InomaW of abm A mendim .2 TOU'APpmPrIalon In Current Amended euc�et 170628j722,02 170%388,118' Pased by majorit vote of the Board of Education of New Hanover Count on the da of Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 4-2-1 Capital Ouda Fund Amendment 09 Defall b Pm Pro PMie P Description Total To record Lotter Project Clos"ut for the followlan Pro Lotter - Pm 076 9037 Retention Pond Improvements (3,1300.00) 9051 Intercom System Up ( 23,012.37 ) 9063 Fire Ahwm Panel Replacement (11997,10) 9058 Fmeman PalontIn ® (8 9065 Williams/Lone Carpet Replaoement (14,188.01) 9070 EfWrical Upgrades (818165.46) 19076 Parkin RepaIrs (39,666.,157) 9078 Structural Repairs (148 9084 Seclusion Roams (21902656) 9095 W, AC Up q80400.8- Revenue: 4.3460.076 PSBCF - Loffer Revenue 4011�333,84 Boa Q%ftQ&16nJ?AMe1in 07/02/2012 4-2-2 New Hanover Count Schools Budg A013roved at 6-5-12 Board Meefl Signature of Requester . Superintendent or Desi Date To be by Fjmrw Depa& Bak h s� Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -2 -3 Amount Bud et Cade Descry ren Increase grease .075 kgo 4011333.$4 4 4,90E37,.076.529.000.931.11 Retention Pond I r pnwements 3,30D.00 4.905 Intemom SYstern Upgrades 23 ,012.37 4.9053.075.529.000.931 Fire Al Panel Repla 1,997-10 4.9068.0` 6.529.31 .945.12 Freeman Painting 5 4 +9055.075.529.000,945.,12 Wi lliarnsUney 2 2met Rep lecem ent 14155.01 4.9070.07 .5 5.000.945.11 Electrical Upgrades 14,345.00 4.9070.075,529.000.945.11 Electrical Upgrades 44,901.45 4.9070,076.529.325.945.11 Laney L htin 4 734.00 4.9070.075.525.358.945.12 Su nset Parr Electrical Irri rcvernen : 5, L 000,00 4.9070.076.529,368.945.12 Sunset Park Electrical Imp rovements 12 155.00 4.9075.073.526.354.945.11 Relandre Play Surface Des' X30.57 4.9075.076,529.364.M. 11 Ro ly nd-G Yse Play Surface - Misc Cent 36 t 327,80 4.9075.075.522.000.945.1 Structura Repa 105, 4.9075.075.525.000.945.11 S tructural Repairs 340.00 4;9075.075.522.352.945.11 N - Br+c dery Wa Weight Rim 25 235.45 4.9075, 070 525.352.945} 11 NHHS - Weight ht Room Des 10, 954.9 4.9078.075.529.352,945.11 NHHS - WeI Fit Room Renmtions 778.42 4.9084.076.529'000.N5.1'1 Seclusion Roans 2 r 902.56 4.9095, 070.525,000.945.11 H AC Upgrades 1 4.9095.075 WAC Upg rades 30- 4.9095-076-526.316,945.11 HVAC Upg rades 1 1 150.00 . 4.9095.075.529.310.945. I I HVAC - UFgrades 20 467.25 4.9095.075.525.342.945.11 1 AC Upgrades I HVAC 1 529.40 4.9095.075.529. Upgrades 14 Totals (should equal) 401 333.54 401 333.54 Justification for Re Pa ital Outlay BA #9 -- Lotteg Project C e -out A013roved at 6-5-12 Board Meefl Signature of Requester . Superintendent or Desi Date To be by Fjmrw Depa& Bak h s� Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 4 -2 -3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 5 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Introduction of Newly Hired Environmental Management Director ,Joe Suleyman BRIEF SUMMARY: Joe Suleyman joined New Hanover County as Environmental Management Director on June 26, 2012. Joe joins our team from Fort Wayne, Indiana, where he most recently served as operations manager for Republic Services, a national waste and recycling services provider. He brings more than ten years of solid waste and recycling collections operations experience focused on customer service, operational efficiency and profitability. Joe, who served as an Executive Officer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and earned the rank of First Lieutenant, holds a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management • Hire, develop and retain talented people RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Meet Mr. Suleyman and welcome him to New Hanover County. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Met Joe Suleyman and welcomed him to New Hanover County. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 5 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Avril Pinder, Assistant County Manager CONTACT(S): Avril Pinder, Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of ABC Board Capital Improvements BRIEF SUMMARY: The local ABC Board makes certain distributions from its gross receipts as required by NC General Statute 18B -805, which describes how their revenues are to be distributed. The statute requires that the ABC Board first make payments for certain primary distributions and other statutory distributions. After these required distributions, the ABC Board may then set aside a portion of the remaining revenues for working capital to operate the ABC system before distributing the remaining revenues to the County's general fund. The ABC Board may also set aside funds for capital improvements before distributions to the County's general fund if approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The local ABC Board is in need of warehouse /distribution center space as well as more space for the mixed beverage (liquor by the drink) operations. They have made all required distributions. The ABC Board is requesting approval from the Board of County Commissioners to set aside a portion of their excess revenues, $2,555,950, for a capital project that would include a new distribution center, a store for sales to mixed beverage permit holders and administrative offices. These monies will be restricted for this capital project and will not be used as a part of the ABC Board's working capital. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Build and maintain infrastructure RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Request Commissioners approve the ABC Board to set aside funds for capital improvements. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 6 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 7 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Commissioner Catlin CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Funding Request from the Wilmington/New Hanover Port, Waterway & Beach Commission BRIEF SUMMARY: Historically the maintenance of the beaches in the County, through the United States Army Corps of Engineers nourishment projects, was funded primarily by the Federal and State governments. With the Federal and State budget constraints, continued funding has been an issue, which the County and Beach Towns proactively addressed through an interlocal agreement dated December 8, 2011. This agreement established contingency plans should Federal or State monies become unavailable for beach nourishment, where the room occupancy tax will pay a maximum of 82.5% and the affected Town pays a maximum of 17.5% of the total project cost. In the State's adopted fiscal year 2013 budget, the funding for Kure Beach nourishment was deleted. The estimated cost to Kure Beach is $1,164,100. To maintain the beach, protect the property along the beach front, and bring economic, environmental, cultural and recreational benefits to the area, the Port Waterway and Beach Commission is recommending the County provide low interest economic development funding from the room occupancy tax fund to Kure Beach for beach nourishment. Should the County approve the funding, staff recommends a 15 -year amortization at 3 %. This would result in a semiannual payment of $48,472.09 (annual payment of $96,944.18). NOTE: The agenda was published on June 26, prior to the meeting of the Wilmington /New Hanover Port, Waterway & Beach Commission on June 27, 2012. The requested amount is an estimate and may be edited after its meeting. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve economic development funding. Authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with Kure Beach for the economic development funding and reimbursement. Adopt the ordinance for budget amendment 13 -001. ATTACHMENTS: Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 7 -0 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 7 -0 AGENDA: July 2, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 13 - 001 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 13 -001 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Intelligent Growth / Economic Development Strategic Objective(s): Innovate programs to protect the environment Fund: Room Occupancy Tax Fund Department: Expenditure: Decrease Increase Intergovernmental expenditure $1,164,100 Intergovenmental revenue $96,944 Total $0 $1,164,100 Revenue: Decrease Increase Appropriated fund balance $1,067,156 Intergovenmental revenue $96,944 Total $0 $1,164,100 Section 2: Explanation Kure Beach is scheduled to have its beach renourished in fiscal year 2013. The state is not providing funding for this renourishment. The interlocal agreement between the beach towns and the County specifies that the beach towns will provide 17.5% of the total cost of the renourishment project in the absence of state funding. The County will provide a loan to Kure Beach to provide its 17.5%, which will be paid back over a 15 year period at 3% interest. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 13 -001, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 2nd day of July, 2012. (SEAL) Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 7 -1 -1 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 8 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Sam Burgess, Senior Planner; Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager and Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director (Planning Board Rep: Dan Hilla) CONTACT(S): Sam Burgess, Senior Planner; Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager, or Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing NOTE: The petitioner has requested that this matter be continued. The Board will consider the continuance immediately after the consent agenda. Rezoning Request (Z -919, 06/12) - Request by Bill Schoettelkotte on Behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC to Rezone Approximately 37.2 Acres at 8704 Market Street from B -1, Business, B -2, Highway Business and R -15 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District BRIEF SUMMARY: At their June 7, 2012 meeting, the Planning Board voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the rezoning request with specific conditions. Numerous nearby residents voiced concerns which included but were not limited to traffic, density, buffering, and types of uses proposed along Old Market Street. The site is classified as both Transition and Watershed Resource Protection on the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Porters Neck Small Area Plan and Market Street Corridor Plan. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Enhance and add recreational, cultural and enrichment amenities • Innovate programs to protect the environment • Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs • Understand and act on citizen needs RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval. Action Needed Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153 -A -341 which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." The statement should also include any condition upon which the approval will be based. Example for Approval: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -0 R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, B -2 Highway Business to Exceptional Design Zoning District as described is: 1) Consistent with the purposes and intent of the Exceptional Design Zoning District outlined in Section 53.6 -1 of the New Hanover County Ordinance and policies of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan, including natural resources, land use, and transportation and 2) Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 37.2 acres at 8704 Market Street from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, and B -2 Highway Business to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District with a density of approximately 7 units per acre adjacent to R -15 residential development when all the specified EDZD design criteria are implemented. Example for Denial: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, B -2 Highway Business to Exceptional Design Zoning District as described is: 1) Not Consistent with the purposes and intent of Policy 5.7 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan because it does not preserve the character of an existing residential neighborhood; and 2) Not Reasonable nor in the public interest to rezone 37.2 acres at 8704 Market Street from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, and B -2 Highway Business to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District with approximately 7 units per acre adjacent to R -15 residential development. The project does not provide a well - rounded mixed use situation as envisioned by the Exceptional Design Zoning District in this location. ATTACHMENTS: Z -919 Script Z -919 Staff Summary Z -919 Petition Summary Z -919 Adjacent Property Owners Map Z -919 Zoning Map Z -919 Zoning- Aerial Map Z -919 Land Classification Map Z -919 Traffic Impact Analysis Approval Letter Z -919 Traffic Impact Analysis Z -919 Application Package -Part 1 Z -919 Application Package -Part 2- Covenants Z -919 Application Package -Part 3 Community Mtgs Z -919 Neighborhood Concerns - Public Comments COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Continued 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -0 Item # 8 Script for Rezoning (Z -919) 06/12 Request by Bill Schoettelkotte on behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC to rezone approximately 37.2 Acres at 8704 Market Street from B -1, Business, B -2, Highway Business and R -15 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District. The site is classified as both Transition and Watershed Resource Protection on the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Porters Neck Small Area Plan and Market Street Corridor Plan. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Open the Public Hearing: a. Staff presentation b. Petitioner's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Petitioner's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the Public Hearing 4. Commissioner Discussion 5. If the Rezoning is denied there is a 12 month waiting period before you may resubmit. Do you wish to proceed or do you wish to continue the matter? 6. Vote on rezoning. The motion to rezone should include a statement saying how the change is or is not consistent with the land use plan and why it is reasonable and in the public interest. Examples of motions appear on the agenda item cover sheet. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -1 -1 CASE: Z -919 (06/12) PETITIONER: Bill Schoettelkotte on behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC REQUEST: Rezone Approximately 37.2 Acres from B -1, B -2, and R -15 Zoning Districts to Exceptional Design Zoning District (EDZD) creating a Sustainable Community of 267 Apartment Units LOCATION: 8704 Market Street (Porters Neck Community) PROJECT: Futch Creek Village Planning Board Action At their regular meeting on June 7, 2012, the planning Board recommended approval of the petitioner's request to rezone the property at 8704 Market Street to EDZD based on the information presented. The vote was 5 -1 with conditions. A host of nearby residents voiced concerns, which included but were not limited to traffic, density, buffering, and types of uses proposed along Old Market Street. This rezoning request is for an exceptional design project. The Exceptional Design Zoning District requirements specify that characteristics of the project be evaluated for conformity with the intent and criteria contained in the ordinance. The site is classified as "Transition" and "Watershed Resource Protection" on the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map. Staff Recommendations in accordance with Section 53.6.5 Planning staff provides the following findings pertaining to the petitioner's request: 1) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general type of function, the physical characteristics of the land, and relation of the proposed development to the surrounding areas and existing and probable future development. The subject property consisting of 37.2 acres is located at 8704 Market Street (aka Old Market Street) and is presently vacant and zoned B -1 Neighborhood Business, B -2 Highway Business, and R -15 Residential. With the exception of the properties fronting Market Street, which are vacant and zoned B -2 and B -1 the project proposal is surrounded by established neighborhoods (Grayson Park, Abby Glen, and Plantation Landing) and is zoned R -15 Residential allowing for a density of 2.5 units per acre. The 37.2 acre parcel contains a variety of mature trees, a manmade pond, 404 wetlands, and a small cemetery located near the southwest corner of the parcel. Topography ranges from almost 50' in elevation near Market Street to approximately 16' near the manmade pond located in the southwestern portion of the parcel. According to NCDENR, the parcel does not contain any federal or state significant species, nor any species currently tracked by the NC Natural Heritage Program. The conceptual plan displays amenities such as a pool, clubhouse, multi -use path, passive open space and multi - purpose field for the proposed community which will provide venues for recreation and social engagement. Z -919, 06/12 Page 1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -2 -1 Staff concludes that this proposal suits the function and characteristics of the land. However, despite the appropriate buffer of natural vegetation proposed, the existing adjoining lower density residential development of the land remains in contrast with the housing fabric of the proposed apartment campus. 2) As to the sufficiency of supporting evidence in the application showing that the proposed location can meet the basic criteria for exceptional design. Evidence provided by the petitioner is sufficient to show that the project if built according to the plan as proposed can likely meet the core requirements for exceptional design. Specific requirements such as bike & pedestrian access, green building certification and Low Impact Development (LID) techniques will be confirmed when the final plan is discussed and reviewed by the County's Technical Review Committee (TRC). There are two job providers within a % mile walk (hardware facility & fencing company) and limited commercial options within walking /biking distance. Commercial and professional services have increased near the Porters Neck /Market Street node. Staff concludes that the support evidence is adequate to show that the proposed location can meet the criteria for exceptional design. Commercial and professional services exist within a mile walking /bike distance meeting the smart location criteria. The lack of a safe haven to travel to such services may be a little problematic. Based on the successful demonstration of the Core Requirements and a total of 14 points earned, the project is eligible for 8 units per acre or a potential of 297 lots. The conceptual plan displays 267 lots /units. 3) As to the relation to major roads and mass transit facilities, utilities, and other facilities and services. One platted and recorded street access (Old Market Street) is available to serve the 267 unit project. Two vehicular access entrances from Old Market Street are displayed on the proposal. Grayson Park subdivision located adjacent and southwest of the project could provide pedestrian connectivity. No mass transit is available but WAVE Transit shows service to the area in future plans. The project proposes to include a multi -use path within the project. The project is close to a host of services based on the Market Street Corridor Plan (Porters Neck /Market Street Activity Node) from the site west along the Old Market Street corridor to its cul -de -sac. Accomplishing a pedestrian /bike connection from the cul -de -sac to Porters Neck Road will strengthen satisfaction of the intent of the proximity to jobs requirement as well as offering a transportation alternative to future and existing residents along Old Market Street and Futch Creek Road. The required traffic impact analysis indicates required improvements at US Highway 17 at Market Street to Futch Creek Road /Stephens Church Road (peak hour signal timing along US 17 in the future as necessary), US 17 at U -Turn Median Break (signal timing along US 17 in the future as necessary), and left turn lanes at the project driveways on Futch Creek Road. Driveway permits will be required (see TIA approval letter). Public water and sewer are located nearby. The Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) has provided a letter supporting capacity for the project. Z -919, 06/12 Page 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -2 -2 A Low Impact Development (LID) stormwater management plan is required of all projects. Staff has reviewed a preliminary plan with a cover letter which proposes adequate LID techniques to satisfy this requirement. Final approval is required through the TRC process if the rezoning is approved. Staff concludes that inter - connectivity with infrastructure in the surrounding area exists but can be strengthened with a bike /pedestrian connection into the Grayson park subdivision. 4) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such instruments, or for amendments in those proposed. The entire 37.2 acre property shown on the New Hanover County tax records belongs to Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC. Staff concludes the petitioner on behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC maintains control of the property. 5) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the suggestion of conditions. The proposal includes a concept plan which demonstrates a broad array of positive design features. The proposed 267 units are expressed as apartments clustered in a series of buildings that will contain one, two, and three bedroom designs. A multi -use path for foot traffic and bikers surrounds the apartment campus in addition to a multi - purpose field and clubhouse area. These features promote physical exercise and social interaction. Staff concludes that the proposed site plan is suitable to express the intentions of the petitioner and in general the satisfaction of required elements. 6) As to the consistency with the County's adopted Land Use Plan and other adopted plans for development in the vicinity, and suggesting how the rezoning might be reasonable and in the public interest if approved. In September, 1989, the County adopted a neighborhood plan called Porters Neck ... Facing the Future. At the time, concerns raised and documented in the plan from nearby residents included environmental and aesthetic issues pertaining to groundwater quality and the natural pastoral fabric of the area. Transportation concerns included road maintenance, inclusion of pedestrian walk -ways, and bike routes. Many residents preferred low density projects. Since 1989 growth in the Porters Neck area has been tremendous and adherence to low density single family development has created a sprawling autocentric environment. The 2006 Land Use Plan includes policies and land classifications that express the County's goals and strategies for steering growth to areas suitable for development while protecting the fragile ecosystems that sustain our quality of life. Several strategies encourage the adoption of exceptional design standards to mitigate the negative impacts of development patterns resulting from our current zoning. Z -919, 06/12 Page 3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -2 -3 Staff concludes that the proposal challenges the 1989 Porters Neck Plan to keep density low, but complies with the expressed goals of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan. The petitioner proposes to establish the creation of a pervious road surface over the two bridges displayed on the conceptual plan to mitigate impact of the wetland buffers and water quality. Based on the layout of the project, recreational areas, decreased impervious surface ratios, and minimal impacts proposed based on LID techniques, Staff feels that the project proposal is reasonable since it meets the core elements and point system requirements. To enhance justification of an Exceptional Design project and criteria, staff recommends that a pedestrian /bike connection be made at the cul -de -sac at Grayson Park and the enhancement of pedestrian /bike access from the western end of Old Market Street to Porters Neck Road. Staff also suggests the creation of a fund by the petitioner to contribute to a safe pedestrian crossing (ped head) from the eastern right -of -way of Porters Neck to the western right -of -way. These future improvements will provide ability for the future residents of Futch Creek Village and surrounding neighborhoods to access the variety of services offered within the Oak Landing shopping center. These recommendations can be reviewed at the TRC level. At their regular meeting on June 7, 2012, the Planning Board recommended approval of the petitioner's request to rezone the property at 8704 Market Street to EDZD based on the information presented and including the following conditions: First, the uses allowed in the commercial section of the project shall be limited to any of the following: Convenient Store Drug Store Restaurants other than fast food Miscellaneous retail Banks Dry Cleaners Childcare Churches Offices Medical Offices; Second, buffers along the north and south property boundaries shall be increased to at least 30' with 90% opacity; Third, RV and boat trailer parking shall not be permitted in the overflow parking lot, Fourth, "controlled" lighting shall be used in the overflow parking areas so that they are illuminated only when residents are present. Fifth, in addition to the improvements recommended in the TIA, the petitioner will add a second right turn lane at Old Market and Business Hwy. 17. Also, timing for the signal at the first Michigan Style turn lane heading north from the Old Market Street /Business Hwy 17 should be adjusted to accommodate increased turning volume. These recommendations are subject to DOT's approval. Z -919, 06/12 Page 4 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -2 -4 Ortinn Nparlarl Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153 -A -341, which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." The statement should also include any condition upon which the approval will be based. Example for Approval: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, B -2 Highway Business to Exceptional Design Zoning District as described is: 1) Consistent with the purposes and intent of the Exceptional Design Zoning District outlined in Section 53.6 -1 of the New Hanover County Ordinance and policies of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan, including natural resources, land use, and transportation; and 2) Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 37.2 acres at 8704 Market Street from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, and B -2 Highway Business to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District with a density of approximately 7 units per acre adjacent to R -15 residential development when all the specified EDZD design criteria are implemented. Example for Denial: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from R -15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, B -2 Highway Business to Exceptional Design Zoning District as described is: 1) Not Consistent with the purposes and intent of Policy 5.7 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan because it does not preserve the character of an existing residential neighborhood, and 2) Not Reasonable nor in the public interest to rezone 37.2 acres at 8704 Market Street from R- 15 Residential, B -1 Neighborhood Business, and B -2 Highway Business to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District with approximately 7 units per acre adjacent to R -15 residential development. The project does not provide a well- rounded mixed use situation as envisioned by the Exceptional Design Zoning District in this location. Z -919, 06/12 Page 5 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -2 -5 Case Z -919 (06/12) Rezone approximately 37.2 acres from B -1, B -2 and R -15 to EDZD Exceptional Design Zoning District to create a sustainable community, consisting of 269 apartments as displayed on conceptual plan. Petition Summary Data 8704 Market Street Owner /Petitioner Bill Schoettelkotte on behalf of Ridgewood Health Investors, LLC Existing Land Use Vacant Zoning History: Area 5 (July 6, 1971) (August, 2005) Land Classification Transition and Watershed Resource Protection Water Type Public Sewer Type Public Recreation Area Ogden Park Access & Traffic Volume Futch Creek Road (minor arterial). Average Daily Trips (ADT) on Futch Creek Road have increased slightly from 1,821 (2010) to 1,944 (2011). Fire District New Hanover County North Watershed & Water Quality Classification Futch Creek SA; HQW 303(d) Aquifer Recharge Area A shallow water -table sand aquifer and underlying artesian aquifer containing fresh water over salty water. Conservation /Historic /Archaeological Resources Small cemetery Soils Leon (Class III), Lynn Haven (Class III), Kenansville (Class 1) Septic Suitability Class I (Slight limitations); Class III (Severe limitations) Schools Ogden Elementary School Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -3 -1 U � w W LU �E NINIIN J W J W U W J p LzLJ Q O Q z Z ~ � — U w w = w — zO J 2 S � (D - Z Q J J �, (� O z W C/) W O ~ J pp ~ = p a W W Q Q z w 2 W~ W W~ J W w m= Z >- Q W 0- Cn >- p W J - J W W C� Q 0 U 2 V J J m V Q U) a J J W z L W W Z z w W p — L J. J C� LL C/) Q Z W Q W Z Cn W p w p z = _> U p >- W Cn U) J J m () — Q W 0 z t1 � Q = m z w W z — w — J L L, J � C� Z uJ Cn of U) = O m rl, - W Z— J Cn U J J J w 0 p > J z m J 0 J z z _ p z J z z Q J O LLI W Q p 0 w = O z J J w Of Q O J c_n Q z J z w Z J _ = Q Z W= W W w Q = U J J z W p W O = U) = ' U) U) Z O � p O m Q C U U > O J J � � Q Q Q z — ~ U w Z W w p = U_ w w ~ J U U w O � Z g LLJ Q O p w _ 0� 0 J W J Z J w = Z< z z Q Z — w z U) O 0~ U) J J z N U W W W L LJ Z= W m J O� W J U p J J U W� z E ~ Q U) J J U) Z (� z z Z Cn Q O J> J C� J Q Cn C� W W U p W W w N C� ~ W W W O O Z 0� C O Q p z z O O w w L L I U U w O D JL: D_ IZ P- P- F-- = = w w U U p w w LL LL CD (D 0 0 = =� 2 2 2 2 2 O w w 0 0 w 0 0 P �: N N 7 CD I` M M O N M I LO C4 I� M M O N M't Ltd (D I` M M O r N M� Ltd CD I` M M O N M I ol /1 � m O r N M r N ti 00 t� M N N m M N r N Qom\ M Re ti N co M M Re � /lglllllll / Il /lllp� M ti N M \ � M r O ,Z, N)e 0 BR o 1 1 r m e m 7 �N LO OC r N y� 1 � . f� Ahl u LP Oi !�` ' I N " ` r, 6 1 l r F L 1 !�` ' I N l o bs, v J k Al 5 \ �P ` 41 a. v E N V1 5 { �� le kD a W 0 " F 4 OF o e- A .-a off 0 c� W J it . ........ . itt Wilmin North Carolina 28402 910 341 3258 910 341 7801 FAX Members.- To s. Moll C. Mathewson, PE, Rame Kemp & Associates From: Mrs. Tara Murph Assoc. Transportation Planner,, Wilmin MPO Cit of WILMINGTON Cc Mr. Sam Bur Planner, New Hanover Count Lead Plannin A ® Mike Kozlosk Executive Director,, Wilmin MPO Town of Mrs. Katie Hite, Division Traffic En NCDOT CAROLINA BEACH Ms. Jessi Booker,, Assistant Division En NCDOT ® Anthon Law, District En NCDOT Town of Mr. David Leonard I I Assistant District En NCDOT KURE BEACH Re. Approval of the Futch Creek Development Traffic Impact Anal (TIA) Town of WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH New Hanover Count NIC NEW HANOVER Date Ma 22, 2012 Count Town of BELVILLE The WMPO, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and New Hanover Count staff have reviewed the Futch Creek Development Traffic Impact Anal (TIA) Town of LELAND report dated December 2 d , 2011. The report has been accepted and appears to meet the minimum re for TIA submittal. Town of NAVASSA As per WMPO and NCDOT review, the developer is responsible for constructin the followin improvements: BRUNSWICK County A. US 17 at Market Street to Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road PENDER in Coordinate with NCDOT to re that NCDCIT adjust the PM peak County hour si timin alon US 17 in the future as necessar CAPE FEAR B, US 17 at U-Turn Median Break Public Transportation Authorit Coordinate with NCDOT to re that NCDOT adjust the PM peak hour si timin alon US 17 in the future as necessar North Carolina BOARD OF C. Market Street at Futch Creek Road TRANSPORTATION No improvements identified. D. Porter's Neck Road at Ed Club Road / Shiraz Wa m No improvements identified. E. Market Street at Proposed Smite Drivewa #1 Construct an exclusive left turn lane on southbound Futch Creek road with a minimum of 175 feet of full-width stora (includin deceleration len and appropriate taper. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-8-1 m Provide one (1) in g ress lane and two (2) e lanes. Construct a full width ba northbound ri lane with 100' of full width stora and appropriate taper. Provide a 100' Internal Protected Stem or the acceptable e thereof. n Provide one (1) in lane and two (2 e lanes. P rovide a 100' 1 nte rna I P rotected Stem o r the acce pta ble e u iva le W1 thereof. The applicant is re to obtain an NCDOT drivewa permit for access to the state road network. All applicable NICDOT drivewa access technical standards and policies shall appl Comments from the Technical Review Committee shall also appl If chan are made to the proposed site drivewa land use and/or intensit the stud parameters will need to be modified and a revised Traffic Impact Anal will be re "or review b NCDOT and the WIVIPO. This approval (dated 05.16.2012) would become nul-.: and void. w i Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-8-2 07. Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis prepared and signed by a licensed traffic engineer is required for all projects (based on proposed maximum density and intensity for the acreage). Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA Prepared For: Cape Fear Commercial 1051 Military Cutoff Road Suite 200 Wilmington, NC 28405 Prepared By: Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27509 NC Corporate License # C -0910 December 2011 RKA Project # 11153 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -2 # lf 0 0!0# % -04 E S/ 10 SEAL B 028926 %*Zyal �� ^'Z 1L TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1. Overview EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the findings of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that was conducted for the proposed Futch Creek development, located along the southeast side of Market Street (to Futch Creek Road) to the east of US 17 in New Hanover County, North Carolina. The proposed development is planned to consist of 75 townhomes, 200 apartments and 200,000 SF of general office space. The development is expected to be fully built out by 2015. Access to the site is currently proposed via two (2) new full - movement driveway connections to Market Street (to Futch Creek Road) located between US 17 and Futch Creek Road. The study area for the TIA was determined through coordination with the coordination with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and consists of the following study intersections: • US 17 & Futch Creek Road /Stephens Church Road • US 17 & U -turn Median Break • Market Street & Futch Creek Road (SR 1400) • Porters Neck Road (SR 1402 / SR 1491) &Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) /Shiraz Way • Two (2) Proposed Site Driveway Connections to Futch Creek Road 2. Existing and Future Traffic Volumes Traffic counts were taken at study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Projected (2015) traffic volumes were estimated using a compounded annual growth rate of 3.0% applied to the existing traffic volumes, based on coordination with the NCDOT and the f;. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -3 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Wilmington Area MPO. Additionally, five (5) adjacent developments are considered as part of this study. The background (2015) traffic volumes include the projected (2015) traffic volumes and the adjacent development traffic. 3. Trip Generation The average weekday daily, AM peak and PM peak hour site trips for the proposed development were calculated utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (8 Edition). Table 1 summarizes the estimated traffic volumes expected to be generation by the proposed development at full build out. TABLE 1 Trip Generation Summary Land Use ITE Code Size 24 Hour Volumes AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Enter Exit Enter Exit General Office 710 20000 sf 2,275 287 39 51 251 Residential Townhome 220 75 Units 501 7 34 32 16 Apartments 230 200 Units 1,336 20 81 83 45 Total Trips 4,112 314 154 166 312 4. Capacity Analysis Summary The study analyzes existing (2011) traffic conditions, background (2015) traffic conditions without the proposed development and combined (2015) traffic conditions with the proposed development during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Intersection of US 17 and Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road Capacity analysis indicates that under existing traffic conditions, the northbound and southbound portions of the signalized intersection operate at an overall level of service (LOS) A during both the AM and PM peak hours. E -2 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -4 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Capacity analysis indicates that under background traffic conditions without the proposed development in place, the northbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS C during PM peak hour. The southbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to continue to operate at an overall LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection of US 17 and Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour under combined conditions. Synchro analysis indicates the westbound right -turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour; however, queues and delays for this movement are not excessive. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits would be expected to result in an overall LOS D for the intersection. Providing an additional right -turn lane on Futch Creek Road for this movement could create weaving issues on US 17, as many of the westbound right- turning vehicles will likely make a u -turn to the north. In addition, right -of -way constraints and proximity to existing buildings would make it difficult to widen Futch Creek Road to provide dual right turn lanes. Intersection of US 17 and Median U -turns Capacity analysis indicates that under existing traffic conditions and background traffic conditions, the northbound and southbound portions of the signalized intersection operate at an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Under combined traffic conditions with the development in place, the southbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS E during the PM peak hour with the southbound through movement on US 17 expected to operate at a LOS E. While the southbound approach of US 17 is expected to operate at LOS E under combined conditions during the PM peak hour, delays and queues for this movement are not excessive. Since the existing cycle length and phase splits are relatively low, small increases in traffic volumes result in disproportionately higher increases in delays. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits result in an overall LOS C for the intersection. Additionally, the queues expected on this approach are expected to increase by less than 10% with the addition of the proposed site traffic during the PM peak hour. E -3 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -5 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Intersection of Market Street and Futch Creek Road Capacity analysis indicates that under existing, background, and combined traffic conditions, the eastbound minor street approach of Market Street is expected to operate at LOS B or better during the both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the northbound left turn movement from Futch Creek Road onto Market Street is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection of Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way Under existing, background and combined traffic conditions, the roundabout at Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way is expected to operate at an overall LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection of Market Street to Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #1 The minor street approach of Site Driveway #1 is expected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours. The left turn movement from Market Street into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. An exclusive left turn lane is considered on Futch Creek Road based on NCDOT turn lane warrants. Intersection of Market Street to Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #2 The minor street approach of Site Driveway #2 is expected to operate at LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours. The left turn movement from Market Street into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. An exclusive left turn lane is considered on Futch Creek Road based on NCDOT turn lane warrants. E -4 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -6 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 5. Recommendations Based on the findings of the study, improvements have been identified and are recommended to accommodate future traffic conditions. Refer to Figure 11 in the TIA report for an illustration of improvements. US 17 & Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road • Coordinate with the NCDOT to request that NCDOT adjust the PM peak hour signal timings along US 17 in the future as necessary. US 17 & Median U -turns • Coordinate with the NCDOT to request that NCDOT adjust the PM peak hour signal timings along US 17 in the future as necessary. Market Street & Futch Creek Road There are no improvements recommended at this intersection. Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way There are no improvements recommended at this intersection. Futch Creek Road . & Site Driveway #1 • Construct Site Driveway #1 with one egress lane and one ingress lane. • Construct an exclusive left turn lane on southbound Futch Creek Road with a minimum of 175 feet of full -width storage (including deceleration length) and appropriate taper. Futch Creek Road . & Site Driveway #2 • Construct Site Driveway #2 with one egress lane and one ingress lane. • Construct an exclusive left turn lane on southbound Futch Creek Road with a minimum of 125 feet of full -width storage (including deceleration length). Since the tapers on Futch Creek Road between Site Driveway #1 and Site Driveway #2 are expected to overlap, it may be necessary to provide a 3 -lane roadway section between the site driveways. E -5 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -7 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 . INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. ..............................1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area ...................................................... ..............................1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access ........................................... ..............................2 1.3. Existing and Proposed Adjacent Land Uses ................................ ..............................2 1.4. Existing Roadway Facilities ........................................................ ..............................4 2. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE ........................................... ............................... 7 3. EXISTING (2011) PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................... ............................... 8 3.1. Existing (2011) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions ........................... ..............................8 3.2. Analysis of Existing (2011) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions ........ ..............................8 4. BACKGROUND (2015) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ..................... .............................11 4.1. Projected Traffic Growth ........................................................... .............................11 4.2. Adjacent Development Traffic .................................................. ..............................1 l 4.3. Background (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions .................... .............................12 4.4. Analysis of Background (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions . .............................12 5. TRIP GENERATION ....................................................................... .............................16 5.1. Site Trip Distribution and Assignment .................. 6. COMBINED (2015) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................. .............................18 6.1. Combined (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions ....................... .............................18 6.2. Analysis of Combined (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions .... .............................18 7. CAPACITY ANALYSIS ................................................................ ............................... 22 7.1. US 17 & Futch Creek Road /Stephens Church Road ...................... ............................... 22 7.2. US 17 & Median U- Turns .............................................................. ............................... 24 7.3. Market Street & Futch Creek Road ................................................ ............................... 26 7.4. Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way ............. ............................... 27 7.5. Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #1 ......................................... ............................... 28 7.6. Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #2 ......................................... ............................... 29 8. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................. ............................... 30 9. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. .............................32 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -8 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Highway Capacity Manual Levels of Service and Delay ......... ..............................7 Table 2 Trip Generation Table ............................................................. .............................16 Table 3 Analysis Summary of US 17 & Futch Creek Road /Stephens Church Road ........23 Table 4 Analysis Summary of US 17 & Median U -Turns ................... .............................24 Table 5 Analysis Summary of Market Street & Futch Creek Road ..... .............................26 Table 6 Analysis Summary of Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way ...........27 Table 7 Analysis Summary of Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #1 ............................28 Table 8 Analysis Summary of Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #2 ............................29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 Site Location Map .................................................................... ..............................3 Figure 2 Preliminary SitePlan ................................................................. ..............................4 Figure 3 Existing Lane Configurations ................................................... ..............................9 Figure 4 Existing (2011) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................... .............................10 Figure 5 Projected (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................... .............................13 Figure 6 Total Adjacent Development Volumes ................................... .............................14 Figure 7 Background (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................... .............................15 Figure 8 Primary Site Trip Distribution Percentages ............................ .............................19 Figure9 Primary Site Trips ................................................................... .............................20 Figure 10 Combined (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................... .............................21 Figure 11 Recommended Lane Configurations ....................................... .............................33 TECHNICAL APPENDIX Appendix A Traffic Count Data Appendix B Adjacent Development Information Appendix C Capacity Calculations — US 17 & Futch Creek Road /Stephens Church Road Appendix D Capacity Calculations — US 17 & Median U -Turns Appendix E Capacity Calculations — Market Street & Futch Creek Road Appendix F Capacity Calculations — Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way Appendix G Capacity Calculations — Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #1 Appendix H Capacity Calculations — Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #2 Appendix I TIA Scoping Letter f;. SSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -9 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) that was conducted for the proposed Futch Creek development, located along the southeast side of Futch Creek Road east of US 17 in New Hanover County, North Carolina. The proposed development is planned to consist of 75 townhomes, 200 apartments and 200,000 SF of general office space. The development is expected to be fully built out by 2015. Access to the site is currently proposed via two (2) new full- movement driveway connections on Futch Creek Road located between US 17 and Market Street. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact to the surrounding transportation system caused by the traffic generated by the proposed development. The TIA scope was determined based on coordination with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). A copy of the approved scoping document is provided in Appendix I. This study provides weekday AM and PM peak hour analyses for the following traffic scenarios: • Existing (2011) traffic conditions • Background (2015) traffic conditions without the development • Combined (2015) conditions with full build out of the development 1.1. Site Location and Study Area The proposed development is located along the southeast side of Futch Creek Road between US 17 and Market Street in New Hanover County, North Carolina, as illustrated on Figure 1. The scope of the project was developed through coordination with the NCDOT and the Wilmington MPO. AAMEY KEM P, Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -10 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Based on coordination efforts, it was determined that the study area would consist of the following intersections: • US 17 & Futch Creek Road/Stephens Church Road • US 17 & U -turn Median Break • Market Street & Futch Creek Road (SR 1400) • Porters Neck Road (SR 1402 /SR 1491) &Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) /Shiraz Way • Two (2) Proposed Site Driveway Connections to Futch Creek Road 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access According to the preliminary site plan, the proposed mixed -use development is expected to be fully built out by 2015 and is expected to consist of the following land uses: • 75 townhome s • 200 Apartment Units • 200,000 square feet of general office space Access to the site is proposed via two (2) new full- movement driveways connections to Futch Creek Road between US 17 and Market Street. Refer to Figure 2 for a conceptual sketch of the site layout and proposed driveway connections. 1.3. Existing and Proposed Adjacent Land Uses Primarily residential land uses exist in the vicinity of the proposed development. The US 17 /I- 140 interchange is located just southwest of the development. Commercial development exists along US 17 south of the I -140 interchange. Based on discussions with the NCDOT and WMPO there are five adjacent developments that shall be considered as part of this study. These developments include Scotts Hill Village, Porters Crossing residential development, Porters Pointe residential development, Waterstone at Porters Neck residential development, and The Registry at Vineyard Plantation. Further discussion of the adjacent development traffic is provided in Section 4 of this report. 2 As S-1 OICIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -11 07/02/2012 8 -9 -12 i „ LU 3 t t A l ct 4 u _ ct i t a tc `. t � � � T� �1 I � t ?` ' ' t �_' �,. s1 S f . q � Y i ` 4 _ � 1'r • ri L) w i�� - I l {, , � ;'a• ,` ! r i! ,� la�� °kC �= t �4`s ,S,,K.: i§ ,= „ \ -- ¢,p, d <` w I 7 `1. 1 ` , gp F Y 4 n (t l i a I' I 5F .F A F , x ` s 1, 1 - u _ J # ,Y ��,'� :3 � ,,,'.:. '', �� •_ - :.= tt # • ray � , �=;;��s; " - . � �„!..& l� I �''�.'. 1, ? `t,� 'tr� i 4, t: e Y^ i ,tu x r � a � 4 I J 1 i I ! i, 1 y E: , 4 1 t 1� "M IS Wel,�a • O �� f , 1 �LJ 10 P I r cj \5' vi l , � I t- A # ' S{ c : � t �� fib 9 A �4 i � Y T n � • J -- � u C t* w t v 1 IY11' 1A t � • � p Of D�- r t I'r tF $ r l� 4 1 - 9�r p r -— B oarl or ommissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -12 I I CD CD War& aw tJ ----------------- tn 41- . . . . . ---- -------- viii � ��_ %� ........... ........... 21 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-13 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 1.4. Existing Roadway Facilities Roadways in the study area include US 17, Market Street, Stephens Church Road, Futch Creek Road, Porters Neck Road, Edgewater Club Road, and Shiraz Way. Locally, US 17 carries traffic in a north -south direction between Wilmington and Jacksonville. In the study area, US 17 is a multi -lane divided highway with a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph). According to the most recent NCDOT data, US 17 carried an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 39,000 vehicles per day (vpd) south of Porters Neck Road and 32,000 vpd north of Porters Neck Road in 2009. Futch Creek Road (SR 1400) is a two -lane facility that connects US 17 to residential development east of US 17. The posted speed limit along Futch Creek Road is 45 mph. According to the most recent NCDOT data, Futch Creek Road carried an ADT volume of approximately 1,600 vpd near its intersection with Market Street in 2009. Market Street is a two -lane facility that extends from Futch Creek Road and terminates at a cul -de -sac to the southwest. There is not a posted speed limit along Market Street. Stephens Church Road is primarily a north - south, two -lane facility that terminates at US 17 and serves as a parallel access road on the west side of US 17. There is not a posted speed limit along Stephens Church Road. Stephens Church Road has an estimated 2011 ADT volume of approximately 200 vpd near its intersection with US 17. Porters Neck Road is an east -west two -lane facility that connects US 17 to the west with Bald Eagle Lane (SR 1401) to the east near the Intracoastal Waterway. The posted speed limit along Porters Neck Road is 45 mph. According to 2009 NCDOT data, Porters Neck Road carried an ADT volume of approximately 12,000 vpd near its intersection with Market Street and 3,400 vpd east of Champ Davis Road. Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) is a two -lane facility that connects Porters Neck Road to the northwest with Beach Road to the east across the Intracoastal Waterway. The posted speed limit along Edgewater Club Road is 45 mph. According to the most recent NCDOT data, 5 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -14 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Edgewater Club Road carried an ADT volume of approximately 4,200 vpd, south of Porters Neck Road in 2009. Shiraz Way is a two -lane facility that connects Porters Neck Road to the south to residential streets to the north. The speed limit and ADT volumes for this roadway facility are not available. 6 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -15 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 2. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Study intersections were analyzed using the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board. Capacity and level of service are the design criteria for this traffic study. Synchro [Version 7], was used to complete the analysis for all of the study area intersections. Synchro 7 was developed by Trafficware Corporation and allows the user to input data into the Synchro software and calculate the output based on methodologies in the 2000 HCM. Please note that the unsignalized capacity analysis does not provide an overall level of service for an intersection but rather a delay for an approach with a conflicting movement. The HCM defines capacity as "the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions." Level of service (LOS) is a term used to represent different driving conditions, and is defined as a "qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists and /or passengers." Level of service varies from LOS "A" representing free flow, to LOS "F" where breakdown conditions are evident. Refer to Table 2 for HCM levels of service and related average control delay per vehicle for both signalized and unsignalized Intersections. Control delay as defined by the HCM includes "initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay ". TABLE 1 Highway Capacity Manual - Levels of Service and Delay 151'I i t„ j IITTESCTD1 I i Lv FvL Avg N, F r S DAV L 77 � u ' .S v D LAV E vEC 4 S:ECDS S E D CCU► A 0 -10 A 0 -10 B 10 -15 B 10 -20 C 15 -25 C 20 -35 D 25 -35 D 35 -55 E 35 -50 E 55 -80 F >50 F >80 M 7 A SSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -16 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 3. EXISTING (2011) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing lane configurations (number of traffic lanes on the intersection approach), storage capacities, traffic signal data and other intersection and roadway information was collected through field reconnaissance by Ramey Kemp &Associates, Inc. (RKA). Refer to Figure 3 for the existing lane configurations and traffic control at the study intersections. 3.1. Existing (2011) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Existing peak hour traffic volumes for the existing study intersections were obtained from traffic counts conducted in October 2011 by RKA during the weekday AM (7:00 — 9:00 AM) and PM (4:30 — 6:30 PM) peak periods. Traffic volumes were balanced between intersections, where appropriate. Refer to Appendix A for a copy of the raw traffic count data. Refer to Figure 4 for the existing (2011) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 3.2. Analysis of Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions The existing (2011) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the current Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections under existing roadway conditions. Existing coordinated signal timing data was provided by the NCDOT and was utilized in all analyses. The results of the analyses are presented in Section 7 of this report. RAMEY c 8 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -17 1 US 17 � w w o Stephens o Church Road Futch Creek Road w w o �n �n N US 17 Futch Creek Road Market Street Futch Creek Road 2 US 17 I M1 Cro John Jai Burney J Freewa3 (US 17) 4!_ Shiraz Way Porters Neck Road + + Porters Neck Road Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Lion ng e Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) 5 A (SR 1491) LINllT LEGEND Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection -O*1f rW- Traffic Lanes ma'. mm 07/02/2012 8 -9 -18 US 17 Futch Creek Road 1 �n US 17 Market �J Road i M M N � .4 8/12 O 0/1 Stephens o -t o 0 Church - * j 226/119 Road �u. Futch Creek Road �n o �o N 00 US 17 2 US 17 N I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (US 17) .0 Shiraz Way IND Futch Creek Road r ' N Porters ° o �n Neck I Market �J Road i Street 8/12 t 0/1 o ( Neck � kn o 0 Futch Creek Road 2 US 17 N I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (US 17) .0 Shiraz Way IND Signalized Intersection r ' N Porters ° o X0 /2 Neck I ~221/263 �J Road i 3/4 10 U QA4;d riAro 22/49 Porters t 163/249 � ( Neck � kn 82/136 � C� oo Road ��00 Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) i Lion ng e Existing (2011) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 4 07/02/2012 /02/2012 8 -9 -19 Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection XX /XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak 10 U QA4;d riAro i Lion ng e Existing (2011) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 4 07/02/2012 /02/2012 8 -9 -19 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 4. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to account for the growth of traffic and subsequent traffic conditions at a future year, background traffic projections are needed. Background traffic is the component of traffic due to the growth of the community and surrounding area that is anticipated to occur regardless of whether the proposed development is constructed. Background traffic is comprised of projected traffic growth within the study area and additional traffic created as a result of approved adjacent developments. 4.1. Projected Traffic Growth Based on coordination with the NCDOT and the Wilmington Area MPO, a compounded annual growth rate of 3.0% was used for the study. The growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes to calculate traffic growth to the full build -out year of the proposed development. Refer to Figure 5 for the projected (2015) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. 4.2. Adjacent Development Traffic There are five (5) adjacent developments in the vicinity of the proposed development that are considered in this study. The proposed Scott Hill Village mixed -use development is located north of the proposed development on US 17. Phase 1 of the Scott Hill Village development, which consists of a clinic area, is complete. The remaining development includes residential, office, retail, and medical land uses. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that the development would be 50% built out by 2015. Therefore, 50% of the total traffic expected to be generated by the Scott Hill Village development was assigned to the study area. The Porters Crossing residential development is assumed to consist of 49 single family homes and is located to the west of Edgewater Club Road on Porters Neck Road. The Porters Pointe residential development is assumed to consist of 61 single family homes and is also located to the west of Edgewater Club Road on Porters Neck Road. The Waterstone at Porters Neck residential development is assumed to consist of 185 single family homes and is located to the south of Porters Neck Road on Edgewater Club Road. The Registry at Vineyard Plantation residential development is assumed to consist of 106 single family homes and is located on KEEP11 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -20 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Old Market Street. For the purpose of this study, each of these developments is assumed to be fully built out by 2015. Trips for Scott Hill Village were taken from the TIA report prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. dated February 3, 2005. Trips for the Registry at Vineyard Plantation were taken from the TIA report prepared by Davenport Consulting in June 2010. Since TIA reports were not completed for the proposed Porters Crossing residential development, Porters Pointe residential development, or the Waterstone at Porters Neck residential development, trips for these developments were generated utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (8 Edition). Refer to Figure 6 for the total adjacent development trip volumes at the study intersections. More detailed information on the adjacent developments can be found in Appendix B of this report. 4.3. Background (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions The background (2015) peak hour traffic volumes were determined by adding the projected (2015) traffic volumes (Figure 5) and the total adjacent development trips (Figure 6). Refer to Figure 7 for an illustration of the background (2015) AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 4.4. Analysis of Background (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions The background peak hour traffic conditions were analyzed according to the same methodology as described for existing conditions. Study intersections were analyzed with existing lane configurations and traffic control, and signalized study intersections were analyzed with existing signal system timings and offsets. The results of these analyses are presented in Section 7 of this report. 12 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -21 US 17 Futch Creek Road 0 Market 1 Street US 17 9/14 00 0/1 o , o Futch Creek Road oo � � � Neck Stephens o ° n Edgewater Club Road Church - -* j L w - 254/134 Road 12/12 Futch Creek �1O Road M � N US 17 Futch Creek Road 0 Market Q Unsignalized Street Porters o Neck 9/14 t 0/1 o 13 BQwr d rif ('rimmiccirinPrc AdlPU41 o Futch Creek Road 2 US 17 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (US 17) .0 Shiraz Way Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized 4-0/2 Porters o Neck ~ 249/296 Road 3/5 0 13 BQwr d rif ('rimmiccirinPrc AdlPU41 25/55 Porters t 183/280 � � � Neck 92/153 � C Road oc Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Lion ng e Projected (2015) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 5 07/02/2012 8 -9 -22 Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX /XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak 13 BQwr d rif ('rimmiccirinPrc AdlPU41 Lion ng e Projected (2015) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 5 07/02/2012 8 -9 -22 US 17 N 4— 3/11 M ~ 2/8 Stephens 2/6 Church Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak 54/35 Road �u. "m r Futch Creek `r' �' Road M °o Road N M N I US 17 Futch Creek Road 0 Market Street 54/35 t 9/6 M Futch Creek Road 2 US 17 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way ` 4— 3/11 Porters Neck .J ~ 2/8 Road 2/6 0 Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Porters t r Neck 7/5 28/94 `r' �' Road M I Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Na W M Lion ng e 07/02/2012 8 -9 -23 Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Na W M Lion ng e 07/02/2012 8 -9 -23 2 US 17 N I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way 1 US 17 O 4-3/13 Porters � � Neck O � .j Road Stephens O � � o ° n Church h 308/169 Road 120/247 9/7 o Edgewater Club Road Futch ') t M l� r--a 12/12 (� Creek Road US 17 � o0 00 00 2 US 17 N I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way Futch Creek Road 00 00 -- 4-3/13 Porters � � Neck �n o .j Road M � Market Street Porters 190/285 � 63/49 t 120/247 9/7 o Edgewater Club Road M l� r--a Futch Creek Road 2 US 17 N I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Lion ng e Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection Background (2015) Traffic Volumes XX /XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak . WGI luati Scale: Not to Scale Figure 7 07/02/2012 8 -9 -24 00 00 -- 4-3/13 Porters � � Neck ~251/304 .j Road f 25/55 Porters 190/285 � Neck 120/247 Road N Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Lion ng e Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection Background (2015) Traffic Volumes XX /XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak . WGI luati Scale: Not to Scale Figure 7 07/02/2012 8 -9 -24 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 5. TRIP GENERATION The average weekday daily, AM peak and PM peak hour site trips for the proposed development were calculated utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (8 Edition). According to the preliminary site plan, the proposed mixed- use development is expected to be fully built out by 2015 and is expected to consist of the following land uses: • 75 townhome s • 200 Apartment Units • 200,000 square feet of general office space Table 2 summarizes the estimated traffic volumes expected to be generation by the proposed development at full build out. It should be noted that no adjustments were made to account for internal capture trips; however, it is possible that some internal trips could occur between the residential and office uses. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Summary Land Use ITE Code Size 24 Hour Volumes AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Enter Exit Enter Exit General Office 710 20000 sf 2,275 287 39 51 251 Residential Townhome 220 75 Units 501 7 34 32 16 Apartments 230 200 Units 1,336 20 81 83 45 Total Trips 4,112 314 154 166 312 RAMEY f;. SSOCIATES 16 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -25 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 5.1. Site Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution percentages are based on the location of residential housing, local employment centers, existing traffic patterns, engineering judgment, and discussions with NCDOT and the Wilmington Area MPO. The approved site trip distribution is as follows: • 70% to /from the south and west via US 17 • 15% to /from the north via US 17 • 15% to /from the south via Futch Creek Road • 5% of the traffic accessing the site via Futch Creek Road is expected to pass through the intersection of Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way. This traffic is anticipated to access the site by traveling to /from the south via Shiraz Way. Refer to Figure 8 for an illustration of the trip distribution percentages. The site trips in Table 2 were assigned to the study intersections based on the distribution percentages shown on Figure 8. Refer to Figure 9 for an illustration of the site trips. RAMEY f;. 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -26 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 6. COMBINED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1. Combined (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions The combined (2015) peak hour traffic volumes were determined by adding the total site trips (Figure 9) to the background (2015) traffic volumes (Figure 7). Refer to Figure 10 for an illustration of the combined (2015) peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 6.2. Analysis of Combined (2015) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions Combined (2015) traffic volumes were analyzed using the same lane configurations and traffic control conditions as under existing and background traffic conditions. In addition, analysis includes any improvements necessary to provide an acceptable operation. RAMEY f;. 18 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -27 US 17 1 a� o� Stephens O Unsignalized Church (85 %) Road XX% Distribution Percentages - Futch t (� Creek Entering (Exiting) 19 Rr�arrl ref (' r�mmiccir-QPrc A4 1 o Road 0 J a irket reet 0 US 17 0 a a o � Stephens Church Road US 17 r ♦ ♦ ♦ Site ` Driveway ` #2 Futch Creek Road irket (SR 1400) reet _ 1 15%1 .- LEGEND Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection XX% Distribution Percentages - (XX %) Entering (Exiting) 19 Rr�arrl ref (' r�mmiccir-QPrc A4 1 Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) 15% Futch Creek Road Plantation Landing Drive 5 Porters Neck Road (SR 1491) 07/02/2012 8 -9 -28 J M N arket treet N US 17 N �Lj N � M 00 N O � Plantation Landing Drive Futch Creek Road irket (SR 1400) reet _ 1 15%1 _- Signalized Intersection 1 US 17 0 N XX/ N O � (XX) Stephens Church -Oj l' /265) Road (131 �u. Futch t (� Creek Road O N N J M N arket treet N US 17 N �Lj N � M 00 N O � Plantation Landing Drive Futch Creek Road irket (SR 1400) reet _ 1 15%1 _- i Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) 15% Futch Creek Road 5 Porters Neck Road (SR 1491) 07/02/2012 8 -9 -29 Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection XX/ Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak (XX) Entering (Exiting) 20 Rr�arrl ref ( 11 i Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) 15% Futch Creek Road 5 Porters Neck Road (SR 1491) 07/02/2012 8 -9 -29 Plantation Landing Drive ulut WWWWWWWWW 1 US 17 Intersection 0 0 N � OC XX /XX Stephens O � M o c� 21 Rrarrl ref ( 11 Church � 439/434 Road Site ` 63/49 �u. 12/12 Futch t (� Creek Driveway ` #2 ` 9/7 �Io7t M Road kn 00 � � N M '--� 00 00 O � M r--a Plantation Landing Drive ulut WWWWWWWWW i Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Combined (2015) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 10 J US 17 7t 0 O o0 M O M N Signalized Intersection O Unsignalized Intersection 0 Roundabout Intersection XX /XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak street 21 Rrarrl ref ( 11 i Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Combined (2015) Traffic Volumes Scale: Not to Scale Figure 10 J US 17 7t 0 O o0 M O M N Futch Creek Road 07/02/2012 8 -9 -30 � o M OrJ [arket � street � Site ` 63/49 t Driveway ` #2 ` 9/7 M I -140 Futch Creek Road Market (SR 1400) Futch Creek Road 07/02/2012 8 -9 -30 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 7. CAPACITY ANALYSIS 7.1. US 17 & Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road The signalized intersection of the US 17 and Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road was analyzed under existing, background and combined conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 3. It should be noted that this intersection exists as a "Superstreet" design. Therefore, left turn movements from the minor streets onto US 17 are prohibited and forced to make u -turns at designated median breaks on US 17. Also, as part of the "Superstreet" design, the signal systems on the northbound and southbound approaches of US 17 operate independently of each other. Therefore, the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersections have been analyzed separately. Refer to Table 3 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix C for the Synchro analysis printouts. Capacity analysis indicates that under existing traffic conditions, the northbound and southbound portions of the signalized intersection operate at an overall level of service (LOS) A during both the AM and PM peak hours with each approach at a LOS C or better. Capacity analysis indicates that under background traffic conditions without the proposed development in place, the northbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS C during PM peak hour. The southbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS A in both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that each intersection approach is expected to continue to operate at a LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the northbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. The southbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to continue to operate at an overall LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that each of the intersection approaches is expected to continue to operate at a LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, with the exception of the westbound right -turn movement, which is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. 22 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -31 Ti^affic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington While the westbound right -turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E under combined conditions during the PM peak hour, the delay this movement is expected to experience is not excessive. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits would be expected to result in an overall LOS D for the intersection. Providing an additional right -turn lane for this movement would create weaving issues on US 17, as many of the westbound right - turning vehicles will likely make a u -turn to the north. In addition, right -of -way constraints and proximity to existing buildings would make it difficult to widen Futch Creek Road to provide dual right turn lanes. TABLE 3 Analysis Summary of US 17 & Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road 4 U 4 4 �� 4 �� I�►.�A I $CFF,`XA,',",," 01 + ". ` ,; C. F RA S LEV v C EV R �C . .. ... A A o rah A o 4; ++ r EXISTING (2011) EB 1 TH (From SBL) B A C A US 17 Northbound WB 1 RT B C (Signalized) NB 2 TH, 1 RT A (9.1 s) A (9.5 s) EXISTING (2011) EB 1 RT B A A A US 17 Southbound WB 1 TH (From NBL) C B (Signalized) SB 2 TH, 1 RT A (1.5 s) A (1.1 s) BACKGROUND (2015) EB 1 TH (From SBL) B B C C US 17 Northbound WB 1 RT C C (Signalized) NB 2 TH, 1 RT B (13.9s) C (21.9s) BACKGROUND (2015) EB 1 RT C A B A US 17 Southbound WB 1 TH (From NBL) C B (Signalized) SB 2 TH, 1 RT A (3.4s) A (5.1 s) COMBINED (2015) EB 1 TH (From SBL) B B B E US 17 Northbound WB 1 RT D E (Signalized) NB 2 TH, 1 RT B (19.3 s) D (56.6s) COMBINED (2015) US 17 Northbound EB 1 TH (From SBL) B B C D (Signalized) WB NB 1 RT 2 TH, 1 RT D B (19.3 s) E D (52.9s) W/ Timing Adjustments COMBINED (2015) EB 1 RT C A B A US 17 Southbound WB 1 TH (From NBL) C B (Signalized) SB 2 TH, 1 RT A (4.2s) A (6.9s) 23 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -32 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Fetch Creek Development, Wilmington 7.2. US 17 & Median U -Turns The signalized intersections of US 17 and Median U -turns to the north of Fetch Creek Road were analyzed under existing, background and combined conditions with the lane configurations shown in Table 4. Since the US 17 /Fetch Creek Road intersection is a "Superstreet" design, left turn movements from the minor streets are forced to make u -turns at this median break. The signal systems on the northbound and southbound approaches of US 17 operate independently of each other; therefore, the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection have been analyzed separately. Refer to Table 4 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix D for the Synchro analysis printouts. TABLE 4 Analysis Summary of US 17 & Median U -turns RAMEY f;. 24 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -33 t .AT.AE3�SIS it LATE I" i i i' S► „ . LEv A .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. = '' = ', EXISTING (2011) EB 1 LT (From SBU) B A C A US 17 Northbound (Signalized) NB 2 TH A (1.3 s) A (1.6s) EXISTING (2011) WB 1 LT (From NBU) C B B A US 17 Southbound (Signalized) SB 2 TH B (13.7s) A (6.3 s) BACKGROUND (2015) EB 1 LT (From SBU) B A C A US 17 Northbound (Signalized) NB 2 TH A (2.3 s) A (3.4s) BACKGROUND (2015) WB 1 LT (From NBU) C C B B US 17 Southbound (Signalized) SB 2 TH C (24.9s) B (12.3 s) COMBINED (2015) EB 1 LT (From SBU) B A C A US 17 Northbound (Signalized) NB 2 TH A (2.2s) A (2.8 s) COMBINED (2015) WB 1 LT (From NBU) D D C E US 17 Southbound (Signalized) SB 2 TH D (42.0s) E (66.4s) COMBINED (2015) US 17 Southbound WB 1 LT (From NBU) D D D C (Signalized) SB 2 TH D (42.0s) B (23.3 s) W/ Timing Adjustments RAMEY f;. 24 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -33 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington Capacity analysis indicates that under existing traffic conditions, the northbound and southbound portions of the signalized intersection operate at an overall LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that each of the intersection approaches operates at a LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Capacity analysis indicates that under background traffic conditions without the proposed development in place, the northbound and southbound portion of the signalized intersection are expected to continue to operate at an overall LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that each of the intersection approaches is expected to continue to operate at a LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the northbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to continue to operate at an overall LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. The southbound portion of the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour. Analysis also indicates that each of the intersection approaches is expected to operate at a LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, with one exception. The through movement for southbound US 17 is expected to operate at a LOS E during the PM peak hour. While the southbound approach of US 17 is expected to operate at LOS E under combined conditions during the PM peak hour, the delay this movement is expected to experience is not excessive. Since the existing cycle length and phase splits are relatively low, small increases in traffic volumes result in disproportionately higher increases in delays. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits result in an overall LOS C for the intersection. Additionally, the queues expected on this approach are expected to increase by less than 10% with the addition of the proposed site traffic during the PM peak hour. 25 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -34 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 7.3. Market Street & Futch Creek Road The unsignalized intersection of Market Street and Futch Creek Road was analyzed under existing, background and combined conditions with the lane configurations shown in Table 5. Refer to Table 5 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix E for the Synchro analysis printouts. TABLE 5 Analysis Summary of Market Street and Futch Creek Road 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor - street approach. Capacity analysis indicates that under existing, background, and combined traffic conditions, the eastbound minor street approach of Market Street is expected to operate at LOS B or better during the both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the northbound left turn movement from Futch Creek Road onto Market Street is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours under each traffic condition. RAMEY f;. 26 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -35 A " ASS' / A R EX 0 A C A 1111- r ©aCh Inver A' oach Inver EXISTING (2011) EB 1 LT -RT A 2 A 2 CONDITIONS NB 1 LT -TH A I N/A A I N/A (Unsignalized) SB 1 TH -RT -- -- BACKGROUND (2015) EB 1 LT -RT B B CONDITIONS NB 1 LT -TH A I N/A A I N/A (Unsignalized) SB 1 TH -RT -- -- COMBINED (2015) EB 1 LT -RT B B CONDITIONS NB 1 LT -TH A I N/A A I N/A (Unsignalized) SB 1 TH -RT -- -- 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor - street approach. Capacity analysis indicates that under existing, background, and combined traffic conditions, the eastbound minor street approach of Market Street is expected to operate at LOS B or better during the both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the northbound left turn movement from Futch Creek Road onto Market Street is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours under each traffic condition. RAMEY f;. 26 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -35 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 7.4. Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way The roundabout intersection of Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way was analyzed under existing, background and combined conditions with the lane configurations shown in Table 6. The software package SIDRA was used to conduct the analysis of the roundabout. Refer to Table 6 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix F for the SIDRA analysis printouts. TABLE 6 Analysis Summary of Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way . t t 4 t , � �. c s: i �► �.. " 4 f, � s . i s .: `" {i,. •{ ,'r, '" � ��:EI��TI► A WE r A NAL S � r, I "'ENE f. R t" SN.�T C;N'�I�►A'�ItNS �� EV S CE ► v t " �* � ., "�e ;e e e e e e e e "•� . ",. �" ' ,. e e e e .. ,,„ .................. . ............................ << n " 4 A r oach overall 4 r A oac�h ? era�i. EXISTING (2011) EB WB 1 LT -TH -RT 1 LT B B B B B B CONDITIONS -TH -RT (Roundabout) NB 1 LT -TH -RT B (10.7s) B (10.4s) SB 1 LT -TH -RT B B BACKGROUND (2015) EB WB 1 LT -TH -RT 1 LT -TH -RT B B B B B B CONDITIONS (Roundabout) NB 1 LT -TH -RT B (11.9s) B (11.2s) SB 1 LT -TH -RT B B COMBINED (2015) EB WB 1 LT -TH -RT 1 LT -TH -RT B B B B B B CONDITIONS (Roundabout) NB 1 LT -TH -RT B (12.1 s) B (11.4s) SB 1 LT -TH -RT B B 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor- street approach. Capacity analysis indicate that under existing, background and combined traffic conditions, the intersection of Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way is expected to operate at an overall LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours with each of the approaches operating at a LOS B during both peak hours. RAMEY f;. 27 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -36 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 7.5. Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #1 The unsignalized intersection of Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #1 was analyzed under combined traffic conditions with the lane configurations shown in Table 7. Refer to Table 7 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix G for the Synchro analysis printouts. TABLE 7 Analysis Summary of Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #1 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor- street approach. *Improvements required by development denoted in BOLD Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the minor street approach of Site Driveway #1 is expected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the left turn movement from Futch Creek Road into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. 28 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -37 Il _ �� I�►.�A v A I�:TID1'�TS v v S J v „ A roach: i> ro �h �v eraii COMBINED (2015) WB 1 LT -RT B B CONDITIONS NB I TH -RT -- N/A -- N/A (unsignalized) SB 1 LT, 1 TH A A 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor- street approach. *Improvements required by development denoted in BOLD Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the minor street approach of Site Driveway #1 is expected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the left turn movement from Futch Creek Road into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. 28 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -37 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 7.6. Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #2 The unsignalized intersection of Market Street to Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #2 was analyzed under combined traffic conditions with the lane configurations shown in Table 8. Refer to Table 8 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix H for the Synchro analysis printouts. TABLE 8 Analysis Summary of Futch Creek Road & Site Driveway #2 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor- street approach. *Improvements required by development denoted in BOLD Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the minor street approach of Site Driveway #2 is expected to operate at LOS B during both peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the left turn movement from Futch Creek Road into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. 29 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -38 Il _ �� I�►.�A v C +C A . . , CON] U TION' v v S J v 1C „ A roach �v eraii i> A ro �h �v eraii COMBINED (2015) WB 1 LT -RT B B CONDITIONS NB I TH -RT -- N/A -- N/A (unsignalized) SB 1 LT, 1 TH A A 1. Level of service for major- street left -turn approach. 2. Level of service for minor- street approach. *Improvements required by development denoted in BOLD Capacity analysis indicates that under combined traffic conditions with the proposed development in place, the minor street approach of Site Driveway #2 is expected to operate at LOS B during both peak hours. Analysis also indicates that the left turn movement from Futch Creek Road into the site is expected to operate at LOS A during both the AM and PM peak hours. 29 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -38 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 8. CONCLUSIONS This traffic impact analysis was conducted to determine the potential traffic impacts caused by the proposed Futch Creek development, located along the southeast side of US 17 in New Hanover County, North Carolina. The proposed development will include 75 townhomes, 200 apartments, and 200,000 s.f. of general office space. The development is expected to be fully built out by 2015. Access to the site is currently proposed via two (2) new full - movement driveways connections to Futch Creek Road located between US 17 and Market Street. The proposed development is expected to generate 4,112 total trips during an average weekday 24 -hour period at full build out. Of this total, 468 (314 entering and 154 exiting) trips are expected to occur during the AM peak hour and 478 (166 entering and 312 exiting) trips are expected to occur during the PM peak hour. This study analyzes study intersections under the following scenarios: 1) existing (2011) traffic conditions, 2) background (2015) traffic conditions with adjacent development trips and without the proposed development, and 3) combined (2015) traffic conditions with full build out of the proposed development. In summary, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on the study intersections. With some minor adjustments to signal timings along US 17, all study intersections would be expected to operate at an acceptable level of service in the future. US 17 and Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road The intersection of US 17 and Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour under combined conditions. Synchro analysis indicates the westbound right -turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour; however, queues and delays for this movement are not excessive. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits would be expected to result in an overall LOS D for the intersection. Providing an additional right -turn lane on Futch Creek Road for this movement could create weaving issues on US 17, as many of the westbound right - turning vehicles will likely make a u -turn to the north. In addition, right -of -way constraints and 30 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -39 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington proximity to existing buildings would make it difficult to widen Futch Creek Road to provide dual right turn lanes. US 17 and Median U -Turns The intersection of US 17 Southbound and the median u -turn is expected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour under combined conditions. While the southbound approach of US 17 is expected to operate at LOS E under combined conditions during the PM peak hour, delays and queues for this movement are not excessive. Since the existing cycle length and phase splits are relatively low, small increases in traffic volumes result in disproportionately higher increases in delays. Providing slight adjustments to the cycle length and phase splits result in an overall LOS C for the intersection. Additionally, the queues expected on this approach are expected to increase by less than 10% with the addition of the proposed site traffic during the PM peak hour. Market Street and Futch Creek Road The eastbound minor street approach of Market Street is expected to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours under each analysis scenario. Porters Neck Road and Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way The roundabout is expected to operate at LOS B or better during the AM and PM peak hours under each analysis scenario. Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #1 The minor street approach of Site Driveway #1 is expected to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. An exclusive left turn lane is considered on Futch Creek Road based on NCDOT turn lane warrants. Futch Creek Road and Site Driveway #2 The minor street approach of Site Driveway #2 is expected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours. An exclusive left turn lane is considered on Futch Creek Road based on NCDOT turn lane warrants. 31 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -40 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Futch Creek Development, Wilmington 9. RECOMMENDATIONS The following geometric and traffic control improvements are recommended to be installed to mitigate the impact of the proposed development: Refer to Figure 11 for an illustration the recommended improvements. US 17 & Futch Creek Road / Stephens Church Road • Coordinate with the NCDOT to request that NCDOT adjust the PM peak hour signal timings along US 17 in the future as necessary. US 17 & Median U -turns • Coordinate with the NCDOT to request that NCDOT adjust the PM peak hour signal timings along US 17 in the future as necessary. Market Street & Futch Creek Road There are no improvements recommended at this intersection. Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road / Shiraz Way There are no improvements recommended at this intersection. Futch Creek Road .& Site Driveway #1 • Construct Site Driveway #1 with one egress lane and one ingress lane. • Construct an exclusive left turn lane on southbound Futch Creek Road with a minimum of 175 feet of full -width storage (including deceleration length) and appropriate taper. Futch Creek Road .& Site Driveway #2 • Construct Site Driveway #2 with one egress lane and one ingress lane. • Construct an exclusive left turn lane on southbound Futch Creek Road with a minimum of 125 feet of full -width storage (including deceleration length). Since the tapers on Futch Creek Road between Site Driveway #1 and Site Driveway #2 are expected to overlap, it may be necessary to provide a 3 -lane roadway section between the site driveways. 32 ASSOCIATES Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -41 Jon ng C Recommended Improvements 1C`C`1nnPrC` WQ4 Scale: Not to Scale Figure I 1 07/02/2012 8 -9 -42 TECHNICAL APPENDIX Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -43 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -44 RAMEY KEMP ..�ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name ; US 17 a@ Futch Creek - Stephens Ch. Road Site Code : 00102611 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No : 1 rrni ine Drinforl_ All Vahir•lcc 08:00 AM 9 US 17 0 2 Futch Creek Road ❑ 50 US 17 2 Stephens Church Road 18 4 0 0 0 0 Southbound 267 278 Westbound 7 0 Northbound 0 Eastbound 0 42 2 2 Start Time Left Thru I Right I Trucks Left Thru I Right I Trucks Left Thru I Ri ht Trucks Left Thru Right I Trucks 11 Exdu. Total lnclu. Total Int. Total 07 :00 AM 10 0 1 0 0 0 39 1 1 191 18 7 0 0 5 0 8 265 273 07:15 AM 5 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 2 210 13 13 0 0 5 0 13 293 306 07:30 AM 12 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 4 194 18 6 0 0 3 0 6 286 292 07:45 AM 21 0 0 4 0 0 63 0 0 228 16 9 0 0 3 0 13 331 344 Total 48 0 1 4 0 0 215 1 7 823 65 35 0 0 16 0 40 1175 1215 08:00 AM 9 0 0 2 ❑ ❑ 50 5 2 188 18 4 0 0 0 0 11 267 278 08 :15 AM 7 0 1 0 0 0 42 2 2 213 17 6 0 0 3 0 8 285 293 08:30 AM 11 0 0 5 0 0 33 0 2 203 16 7 0 0 1 0 12 266 278 08 :45 AM 5 0 0 1 0 0 48 6 1 200 13 12 0 0 2 0 19 269 288 Total 32 0 1 8 0 0 173 13 7 804 64 29 0 0 6 0 50 1087 1137 Break ** 04:30 PM 19 0 0 3 0 ❑ 24 2 2 327 22 1 0 0 0 ❑ 6 394 400 04:45 PM 11 0 0 1 0 0 27 1 6 358 29 4 0 0 2 0 6 433 439 Total 30 0 0 4 0 0 51 3 8 685 51 5 0 0 2 ❑ 12 827 839 05 :00 PM 11 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 383 28 4 0 0 3 0 4 454 458 05:15 PM 10 0 0 1 0 0 24 0 4 436 25 2 0 0 1 0 3 500 503 05:30 PM 12 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 4 381 22 0 ❑ 0 5 0 0 463 463 05:45 PM 8 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 5 352 32 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 425 426 Total 41 0 0 1 0 0 116 0 13 1552 107 7 1 0 0 13 0 8 1842 1850 06:00 PM 9 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 4 289 23 1 0 ❑ 1 0 1 353 354 06 :15 PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 4 310 14 0 0 0 4 0 0 370 370 Grand Total 170 0 2 17 0 0 610 17 43 4463 324 77 0 0 42 0 111 5654 5765 Apprch % 98.8 0 1.2 0 0 100 0.9 92.4 6.7 0 0 100 Total % 3 0 0 0 0 10.8 0.8 78.9 5.7 ❑ 0 0.7 1.9 98.1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -45 s RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872- -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : US 17 a@ Futch Creek -- Stephens Ch. Road Site Code : 001 02611 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No : 2 U5 '17 Out In Total 5073 P72 E5245 21 01 17❑ Rl ht Thru Left c� coo C North ..� °2 n 1 0/26/2011 07:00 AM �2 u, 1012612011 06:15 PM s Lo 0 0 � 0 p n. All Vehicles o a W j in 4 -� F+ Left Th ru Right 4 31 44631 32 42 4830 4872 Out In Total HR 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -46 RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5415 File Name : US 17 a@ Futch Creek - Stephens Ch. Road Site Code : 00102611 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No :3 U5 17 Out In Total 046 F 1093 01 01 47 R ht Th ru Left Peak Hour Data a v s o ❑ ~ v � s rt `n North �rn s U L j �--- ---1 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 ARI 4 — � N CD v rn x � � or — All Vehicles r- o CL v � 0� o °' �� v 0o — F 4 Left Thru Right 8 8201 65 11 893 904 Out In Total I IS 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -47 U5 17 Futch Creek Road U5 17 Stephens Church Road Southbound Westbound I Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right I App. Total LeftF Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App.Total Left I Thru Right F App , Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07: 00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 5 ❑ ❑ - 5 ❑ ❑ 58 58 2 210 13 225 ❑ ❑ 5 5 293 07 :30 AM 12 ❑ ❑ 12 ❑ ❑ 55 55 4 194 18 216 ❑ ❑ 3 3 286 07 :45 AM 21 ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ 63 63 ❑ 228 16 244 ❑ ❑ 3 3 331 08 :00 AM 9 0 0 9 0 0 50 50 2 188 18 208 0 0 0 0 267 Total Volume 47 0 0 47 ❑ ❑ 226 226 8 820 65 893 0 0 11 11 1177 % App. Total 1 100 0 0 1 0 0 100 1 0.9 91.8 7.3 0 ❑ 100 PHF 1 .560 .000 .000 .560 1 .000 .000 .897 .897 1 .500 .899 .903 .915 1 .000 .000 .550 .550 1 .889 U5 17 Out In Total 046 F 1093 01 01 47 R ht Th ru Left Peak Hour Data a v s o ❑ ~ v � s rt `n North �rn s U L j �--- ---1 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 ARI 4 — � N CD v rn x � � or — All Vehicles r- o CL v � 0� o °' �� v 0o — F 4 Left Thru Right 8 8201 65 11 893 904 Out In Total I IS 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -47 RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : US 17 @ Futch Creek- Stephens Ch. Road US 17 Out In Total 1 677 44 1721 01 01 44 Ri ht Thru Left L' �a 0� a) CK � J 2 r O 2 C � I Na E Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P All Vehicles 0 -n �.7 3 M .•F 3 n �o ? O co x r o � C. 4- 4� T F Left Thru Right 141 15581 104 11 1676 1687 Out In Total HR 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -48 Site Code : 001 02611 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No : 4 US 17 Futch Creek Road US 17 Stephens Church Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Ri ht App. Total Left Thru Right A Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Ri ht A . Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 11 0 0 11 0 0 27 27 6 358 29 393 0 0 2 2 433 05 :00 PM 11 0 0 11 0 0 29 29 0 383 28 411 0 0 3 3 454 05:15 PM 10 0 0 10 0 0 24 24 4 436 25 465 0 0 1 1 Soo 05:30 PM 12 ❑ 0 12 0 ❑ 39 39 4 381 22 407 0 0 5 5 463 Total Volume 44 0 0 44 0 0 119 119 14 1558 104 1676 0 0 11 11 1850 % App. Total 1 100 0 0 1 0 0 100 0.8 93 6.2 1 0 ❑ 100 PHF 1 .917 .0 00 .000 .917 1 .000 .000 .753 .763 .583 .893 .897 .901 1 .000 .000 .554 .550 1 .925 _ US 17 Out In Total 1 677 44 1721 01 01 44 Ri ht Thru Left L' �a 0� a) CK � J 2 r O 2 C � I Na E Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P All Vehicles 0 -n �.7 3 M .•F 3 n �o ? O co x r o � C. 4- 4� T F Left Thru Right 141 15581 104 11 1676 1687 Out In Total HR 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -48 RAMEY KEMP . . ... ... ... .. ....... ... ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : US 17 a@ U -Turn Median Break Site Code : 10261122 - Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No : 1 f'_'rni ene 0rin#nrl_ ❑ II 1lahie+loe 08:00 AM 3 US, 17 0 14 0 0 0 US 17 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 Southbound 382 08:15 AM Westbound 325 0 Northbound 0 0 Eastbound 0 27 0 0 Start Time Left Thru I Right I Trucks Left I Thru I Right I Trucks Left I Thru I Ri ht Trucks Left I Thru I Right I Trucks Exclu. Total I Inclu. Total I Int. Total 07:00 AM 4 296 0 7 0 0 0 0 29 ❑ 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 329 337 07:15 AM 0 418 0 9 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 467 476 07:30 AM 2 418 0 12 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 478 490 07:45 AM 3 393 0 8 ❑ 0 0 0 39 0 0 2 ❑ 0 0 0 10 435 445 Total 9 1525 0 36 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 39 1709 1748 08:00 AM 3 333 0 14 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 367 382 08:15 AM 2 325 0 14 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 354 370 08:30 AM 4 329 0 22 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 359 381 08:45 AM 0 327 0 9 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 348 357 Total 9 1314 0 59 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 fit 1428 1490 Break ** 04:30 PM 0 347 0 16 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 360 376 04:45 PM 4 294 0 12 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 312 324 Total 4 641 0 28 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 672 700 05 :00 PM 1 330 0 8 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 346 355 05:15 PM 1 351 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 363 374 05 :30 PM 0 303 0 8 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 10 324 334 05:45 PM 4 312 0 6 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 342 349 Total 6 1296 0 33 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 37 1375 1412 06:00 PM 1 300 0 12 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 324 336 06 :15 PM 1 281 0 15 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 295 310 Grand Total 30 5357 0 183 0 0 0 0 416 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 193 5803 5996 Apprch % 0.6 99.4 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0.5 92.3 0 0 0 0 7.2 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 96.8 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -49 RAMEY KEMP . .. . .. . ........... ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872-5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : US 17 a@ UWTurn [Median Break Site Code : 10261122 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No :2 US 1 7 Out In Total 5387 5387 1 01 5357 30 Ri ht Thru Left �-F c� 0 North '�� v � --� 10/26/2011 07:00 AM �2 10/26/2011 05:15 PM v lo v� All Vehicles o o E v +-1 wm v— I F Left Thru Right 01 01 s 5357 P4 6 5773 Out In Total Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -50 RAMEY KEMP -- --- ----- - ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : US 17 a@ U -Turn Median Break Site Code : 10261122 Start Date : 10/26/2011 Page No :3 US 17 US 17 Out In Total F0 1570 15 O 01 15621 8 R; ht Thru 1 US 17 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru I Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07 :15 AM 0 418 0 418 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 49 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 467 07:30 AM 2 418 0 420 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 58 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 478 07:45 AM 3 393 0 396 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 39 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 435 08:00 AM 3 333 0 336 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 ❑ 0 0 0 367 Total Volume 8 1562 0 1570 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 177 0 0 0 ❑ 1747 % App. Total 0.5 99.5 ❑ 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .667 .934 .000 .935 .000 .000 .000 .000 .763 .000 .000 ____ .763 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .914 US 17 I F Out In Total F0 1570 15 O 01 15621 8 R; ht Thru 1 Left L' 7� 6 v a� J v c ° v D Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 A All Vehicles 1� 5! = v v CD v a m 00 — *1 I F Left Thru Right 1771 0 0 15fi2 177 1739 Out In Total 1 I 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -51 R A M E Y K E M P ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : U5 17 a@ U -Turn Median Break Site Cede : 10251122 Start Date : 10/25/2011 Page No : 4 U5 17 Out In Total F0 Li ? Z1 328 01 13221 fi Ri ht Thru Left 4 _Cr> J v � v s� H C1 ° o� Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P All Vehicles �o �' v =r ♦- --- - CD =v v r v o m rn -- +1 US 1 7 Left Thru Right 53 01 ❑ 1322 53 1375 Out US 1 7 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left I Thru I Riih:t:j Total Left I Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right Ap2.Total Left I Thru RightT Total Int. Tofal Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 347 0 347 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 360 04:45 PM 4 294 0 298 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 312 05:00 PM 1 330 0 331 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 346 05:15 PM 1 351 ❑ 352 0 0 0 ❑ 11 0 0 11 0 ❑ 0 0 363 Total Volume 6 1322 0 1328 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 1381 % App. Total 0.5 99.5 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 ❑ 0 PHF .375 .942 .000 .943 1 .000 .0 .000 .000 1 .883 .000 .000 .883 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .951 U5 17 Out In Total F0 Li ? Z1 328 01 13221 fi Ri ht Thru Left 4 _Cr> J v � v s� H C1 ° o� Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P All Vehicles �o �' v =r ♦- --- - CD =v v r v o m rn -- +1 I F� Left Thru Right 53 01 ❑ 1322 53 1375 Out In Total 1IR 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -52 RAMEY KEMP . . . ..... .. ...... ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : Market Street @ Futch Creek Road Site Code : 10271122 Start Date : 10/27/2011 Page No : 1 f-rni inc ❑rinfarl_ All Vahiniac 08 :00 AM Futch Creek Road 0 Futch Creek Road 0 26 Market Street 6 1 5 5 47 Southbound 08:15 AM Northbound 4 1 Eastbound 18 0 1 0 Start Time Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Trucks Left Right Trucks Exclu. Total lnclu. Total Int. Total 07 :00 AM 16 7 0 0 22 0 2 0 0 0 47 47 07:15 AM 8 7 0 0 30 1 1 0 0 1 46 47 07:30 AM 12 2 0 0 29 0 1 0 0 0 44 44 07:45 AM 15 1 2 0 23 0 4 0 1 3 43 46 Total 51 17 2 0 104 1 8 0 1 4 180 184 08 :00 AM 14 0 0 0 26 0 6 1 5 5 47 52 08:15 AM 17 4 1 0 18 0 1 0 1 2 40 42 08 :30 AM 19 1 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 2 31 33 08 :45 AM 23 2 1 0 35 1 2 0 1 3 62 65 Total 73 7 4 0 90 1 9 1 7 12 180 192 *� Break *� 04:30 PM 13 2 3 0 18 4 2 0 1 8 35 43 04:45 PM 25 1 0 0 18 2 1 0 0 2 45 47 Total 38 3 3 0 36 6 3 0 1 10 80 90 05:00 PM 19 2 3 0 10 0 3 0 0 3 34 37 05:15 PM 24 0 0 0 24 2 3 0 0 2 51 53 05:30 PM 27 1 0 0 10 0 5 1 0 0 44 44 05 :45 PM 16 2 1 0 14 1 0 1 0 2 33 35 Total 86 5 4 0 58 3 11 2 0 7 162 169 06:00 PM 25 4 0 0 11 0 5 0 0 0 45 45 06:15 PM 14 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 22 23 Grand Total 287 37 14 0 306 11 36 3 9 34 669 703 Apprch ° /a 88.6 11.4 0 100 92.3 7.7 Total % 42.9 5.5 0 45.7 5.4 0.4 4.8 95.2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -53 RAMEY KEMP .. . ... ..... .. - ---------- - ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27509 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5415 File Name : Market Street a@ Futch Creek Road Site Code : 10271122 Start Date : 10/27/2011 Page No :2 Futch Creek Road Out In Total 342 324 F 666 371 287 Ri ht Thru 1 �(0 0 North Cn � y 10/27/20 ❑7:00 AM 0127120 06:15 PM All Vehicles 0 Left Thru ❑ 3 ❑6 29❑ 3 ❑6 596 Out In Total Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -54 .. RAMEY KEMP .. .. .. .... � ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : Market Street @ Futch Creek Road Site Cade : 10271122 Start Date : 10/27/2011 Page No : 3 Futch Creek Road O ut In Total 112 4 180 171 51 ht Thru T � N N 00 2 00 J � E r Q Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 A All Vehicles +-] I Left Thru 0 104 51 104 155 Out In Total Fufr:h (Irc?pk Road Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -55 Futch Greek Road Futch Greek Road Market Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total - App. Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11 :45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 16 7 23 0 22 22 2 0 2 47 07:15 AM 8 7 15 0 30 30 1 0 1 46 07:30 AM 12 2 14 0 29 29 1 0 1 44 07 :45 AM 15 1 16 0 23 23 4 0 4 43 Total Volume 51 17 68 0 104 104 8 0 8 180 % App. Total 1 75 25 1 0 100 1 100 0 P H F 1 .797 .607 .739 1 .000 .867 .867 1 .500 .000 .500 _ .957 Futch Creek Road O ut In Total 112 4 180 171 51 ht Thru T � N N 00 2 00 J � E r Q Peak Hour Data T North Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 A All Vehicles +-] I Left Thru 0 104 51 104 155 Out In Total Fufr:h (Irc?pk Road Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -55 RAMEY KEMP . .. ....... ......... .. ...... . ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : Market Street a@ Futch Creek Road Futch Creek Road Out In Total __n_.7 E 1731 41 95 Ri ht Thru - a r v f!� C r�-� J . Y ca L� E 0 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P All Vehicles 4� T Left Thru 0 62 9s s2 15s Out In Total Futr:h ('.reek Read Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -56 Site Code : 102711 22 Start Date : 10/27/2011 Page No : 4 Futch Creek Road Futch Creek Road Market Street Southbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Thru Right I App. Total Leftj Thru I App. Total Left Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12 :00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 25 1 26 0 18 18 1 0 1 45 05 :00 PM 19 2 21 0 10 10 3 0 3 34 05:15 PM 24 0 24 0 24 24 3 0 3 51 05:30 PM 27 1 28 0 10 10 5 1 6 44 Total Volume 95 4 99 0 62 62 12 1 13 174 % App. Total 96 4 0 100 92.3 7.7 PHF .880 .500 .884 .000 .646 .646 .600 .250 .542 1 .853 Futch Creek Road Out In Total __n_.7 E 1731 41 95 Ri ht Thru - a r v f!� C r�-� J . Y ca L� E 0 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P All Vehicles 4� T Left Thru 0 62 9s s2 15s Out In Total Futr:h ('.reek Read Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -56 RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : Porters Neck Rd a@ Edgewater Club Rd +Shiraz Way Site Code : 10252011 Start Date : 10/25/2011 Page No : 1 f.'.rni ine Orintarl_ ❑ II k ahinlae 08:00 AM 0 Shiraz Way 14 Porters Neck Road 1 Edgewater Club Road 0 Porters Neck Road 31 3 1 1 8 49 Southbound 2 3 Westbound 167 08:15 AM Northbound 2 17 Eastbound 0 53 2 1 Start Time Left Thru Right I Trucks Left Thru I Right I Trucks Left I Thru j Right I Trucks Left I Thru I Right Trucks Exdu, Total In du. Total I Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 17 0 1 49 0 0 29 1 1 0 0 23 4 0 0 126 126 07:15 AM 0 1 41 0 0 60 0 4 55 6 4 2 4 26 20 5 11 217 228 07:30 AM 0 1 30 0 2 68 0 2 39 3 2 0 4 30 24 4 6 203 209 07:45 AM 0 1 20 0 ❑ 50 0 1 40 ❑ 1 1 6 58 24 6 8 200 208 Total 0 4 108 0 3 227 0 7 163 10 8 3 14 137 72 15 25 746 771 08:00 AM 0 0 14 0 1 43 0 0 31 3 1 1 8 49 14 2 3 164 167 08:15 AM 0 2 17 0 0 53 2 1 35 1 2 0 2 55 23 2 3 192 195 08:30 AM 0 1 18 0 2 57 0 0 31 2 0 0 1 46 33 6 6 191 197 08:45 AM 0 0 15 0 3 43 0 1 33 0 1 1 7 46 31 4 6 179 185 Total 0 3 64 0 6 196 2 2 130 6 4 2 18 196 101 14 18 726 744 ** Break ** 04:30 PM 1 1 13 0 0 61 1 1 35 2 1 1 10 70 31 0 2 226 228 04:45 PM 1 0 17 0 0 47 0 2 32 2 1 4 7 69 27 0 6 203 209 Total 2 1 30 0 0 108 1 3 67 4 2 5 17 139 58 0 8 429 437 05:00 PM 0 2 21 0 0 76 1 0 44 2 2 2 17 53 42 0 2 260 262 05:15 PM 0 0 18 0 4 79 0 0 28 2 1 0 15 57 36 0 0 240 240 05:30 PM 0 1 11 0 0 60 0 1 34 0 3 1 10 64 32 0 2 215 217 05:45 PM 1 0 10 0 1 53 0 0 17 1 2 0 12 47 34 0 0 178 178 Total 1 3 60 0 1 5 268 1 1 123 5 8 3 54 221 144 0 4 893 897 06:00 PM 1 3 10 0 0 32 1 0 17 0 0 0 14 65 38 0 0 181 181 06:15 PM 0 0 9 0 1 39 1 1 16 2 0 0 14 36 26 0 1 144 145 Grand Total 4 14 281 0 15 870 6 14 516 27 22 13 131 794 439 29 56 3119 3175 Apprch % 1.3 4.7 94 1.7 97.6 0.7 91.3 4.8 3.9 9.6 58.2 32.2 Total % 0.1 0.4 9 0.5 27.9 0.2 16.5 0.9 0.7 4.2 25.5 14.1 1.8 98.2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -57 RAMEY KEMP .. ....... " ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite. 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872-5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name : Porters Neck Rd a@ Edgewater Club Rd +Shiraz Way Site Code : 10252011 Start Date : 1 0/25/2011 Page No : 2 Shiraz Way Out In Total 154 299 453 2811 141 4 Ri ht Th ru Left 0 �-F � M 0M r co r_-o r-. o r North =r ° a. W - � rn m Nr 3i _ �' ti t 10/25/2011 07:00 AM 4--- -- =r 0 ° 0 ~ 10/25/2011 05:15 PM 2 v � rn� a L All Vehicles �-- _j, o o. Q r c r, -4 i i 4 F Lett Th ru Ri ht 5 458 555 1033 Out In Total Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -58 RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name :Porters Neck Rd @Edgewater Club Rd +Shiraz Way Site Code :10252011 Start Date :10/25/2011 Page No :3 Sh iraz Way Out In Total 34 08 '142 1051 3 0 Ri ht Thru Left +� 1 4 -co on ~ N 16--t 0 J W co Y Q C r UD Z L N +- _ a �� O R Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 A All Vehicles y O � s O CD N 2 N N n s 0 r o W � co m Shiraz Way F+ Left Thru Right Porters Neck Road 121 8 Edgewater Club Road 273 Porters Neck Road Out Fdaewater In Club Total Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru I Right I App. Total Left I Thru'l Right I App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total In t. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11 :45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07 :15 AM 07:15 AM 0 1 41 42 0 60 ❑ 60 55 6 4 65 4 26 20 50 217 07:30 AM 0 1 30 31 2 68 ❑ 70 39 3 2 44 4 30 24 58 203 07:45 AM 0 1 20 21 0 50 0- 50 40 ❑ 1 41 6 58 24 88 200 08:00 AM 0 0 14 14 1 43 ❑ 44 31 3 1 35 8 49 14 71 164 Total Volume 0 3 105 108 3 221 0 224 165 12 8 185 22 163 82 267 784 % App. Total ❑ 2.8 97.2 1.3 98.7 0 89.2 6.5 4.3 8.2 61 30.7 PHF .000 .750 .640 .643 .375 .813 .000 .800 .750 .500 .500 .712 .688 .703 .854 .759 .903 Sh iraz Way Out In Total 34 08 '142 1051 3 0 Ri ht Thru Left +� 1 4 -co on ~ N 16--t 0 J W co Y Q C r UD Z L N +- _ a �� O R Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 A All Vehicles y O � s O CD N 2 N N n s 0 r o W � co m Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -59 T F+ Left Thru Right 165 121 8 88 273 185 Out Fdaewater In Club Total Road Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -59 RAM E Y K E M P --- ---------- . .......... . .. ASSOCIATES 5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27609 PH: 919 872 -5115 FX: 919 878 -5416 File Name :Porters Neck Rd @Edgewater Club Rd +Shiraz Way Site Code :10252011 Start Date :10/25/2011 Page No : 4 Shiraz Way Out In Total 59 74 133 691 31 2 ht Thru L e Ri ft T I L' �v v CD H rn m a�iJ o O� r1 Z r-[! N = Iv n 1 121 a = r ► o Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P All Vehicles •� N o rn o = N �1 CD N N - Z w 0 CD r ❑ w � L,.. ti0 a +- 1 T F4 Shiraz Way 143 152 295 Porters Neck Road In Total Rnnd Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru I Right I App.Total Left Thru Right APP.Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Ri ht App Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 1 1 13 15 0 61 1 fit 35 2 1 38 10 70 31 111 226 04:45 PNI 1 0 17 18 0 47 0 47 32 2 1 35 7 69 27 103 203 05 :00 PM 0 2 21 23 0 76 1 77 44 2 2 48 17 53 42 112 260 05:15 PM 0 ❑ 18 18 4 79 0 83 28 2 1 31 15 57 36 108 240 Total Volume 2 3 69 74 4 263 2 269 139 8 5 152 49 249 136 434 929 % App. Total 1 2.7 4.1 93.2 1 1.5 97.8 0.7 1 91.4 5.3 3.3 11.3 57.4 31.3 PHF 1 .500 .375 .821 .804 1 .250' .832 .500 .810 1 .790 1.00 .625 .792 .721 .889 .810 .969 1 .893 Shiraz Way Out In Total 59 74 133 691 31 2 ht Thru L e Ri ft T I L' �v v CD H rn m a�iJ o O� r1 Z r-[! N = Iv n 1 121 a = r ► o Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P All Vehicles •� N o rn o = N �1 CD N N - Z w 0 CD r ❑ w � L,.. ti0 a +- 1 T F4 Left Thru Ri ht 1391 8 5 143 152 295 Out FrinPwater_C;luh In Total Rnnd Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -60 APPENDIX B ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -61 L C d H G m E CL 0 d CD c (D U M Q II M- ME CD co co g g CD d' � ! 0° I cocav cow r NO erg co v LVhNV0r c�cocv_ �y?cov oa =p- M co =- rr vNNNNr co .�- REF I ce) r ` ti 0 N 0 M00 v o �r` oot-0 �t��NrC) 0 �� ax r 00 co M L7 v Ln d3 a7 .. !M7 "Cr CIO -R W r` to r C'7 N CD d ; r 0 1r o0 ; �e r- r 1 le co h 1*- 0 N 00 � - m o m 00 Nti 0 z r 00 co M �n v w d7 ❑7 .. M et c0 ! r` to r M N CD C6 t 10 061 .1i aim - I _ 1 C C C C wcoc cn I! - 1! I I M2 W OPW - 00000 N 0 %— v �' ° v c c° r- t ,. CM LO W co co co � LD 0 C r N v v v 0 v v CL � rN�7wV -NMrNN •r � lol N N N N CD [D CO ti ti 00 m - (0) U W) U) �l - U L- 01 CL I-- N U) CL -o CL =- o• a � LU0.. 1- _- F- v .@ � ?- CL — U L i0 Mla -, D l - o � � o � (D a' � F- F•- � I al H �C�Q 0 U rn [] all a CD . _ ED E . E tea= a z t��N o ll N ` I I - II II Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -62 .. C CO 0 0 Q N � Q] r r Q Q7 p m o CD C o v v o v r l M N N r N N r r N I C I =o: t �u3N a am N �n M t-M M MM L Ln 0 1 0 1 a� =yc J = r � clr S Sty r q qt q qt t r r r r 0 07Iqt I WS != G7 N 0 00 0 0 N r M N C CD M M w w N N q qt M M r r 0 = W am -- c 00 o oQ L Lfl L LO c co v v r cD 0 00 C 00 N CO p N _C' r r� N ^ ^r L Ln ! G3 = N rC+7 3 3 N N r N r r` M M v M �l�,I v W7 -tea N . A. I w Q" Ql M N N N CO 0 0 r r{ 0 M I In d d" 0 0) L [� M L7 N M N I .. [ Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -62 i r r f T raffic Impact Analysi's fo r Scotts Hill Village New Hanover County, North Carolina Prepared f6r; LS 3P Associates Ltd. Wilmington, North Carolina Prepared By; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 33868 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3468 (919) 677 -2844 012414002 February Zoo *; ,.r -r• ��; .r. 4 r ,��ti •�� Iti s7 • �r � r i � O � f w L f L� Y LPL• �A 0 fr '� r. i l� �` istti.lti '�� Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -63 '3NI 'S31V100M ONV NNO14— A31Y9IN Q! ,IUIIBVn 1noH11M 3e 11d14S '3NI 'S3.LVIOOSSv' ONY N80H —A3114I)i A13 NOILV1dMV ONV NOILVZI?J%UnV N30EIM 1r7ggm 1N3Wnwo S1141 140 30NVn38 NUGHMI ONY -40 3sn:;N 'p3vvd3ud svm 11 H011dM No.3 1N3no ONV 3SOdand 31{1 ZICW AIN0 03ON31NI SI '331AN2S 30 iN314nWSNI NV SV 'NIAGH 031N3S3ad SNDIS30 ONV S1430NO0 3H1 H11M 0140001 '1243wnOoo SIHl SIS)OVNV l3dd W I OIAAV�11 lul'Sa'}8IMV pug U aoy- AOIWDI NV 31IS 38noIj 30V111A IIIH SHOOS Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 mamma J. .1.O. 9 IMI" >r.. >r.. 1rr 2. ...p 5 #AP'Vlf — ll!H S;3o II'.H 81100S ZOO ItZT01Nd1:H Scotts Mill Tillage —New Hatxover Counoi, NC 4.0 Traffic Generation The traffic generation potential of the proposed development was determined using the traffic g generation rates published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Seventh Edition, 2003). Table 4.0 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the proposed development. Table 4.0 iTE Traffic Generation (Vehicles) Land �4 Hour AM Peak PM leak Use Land Use intensity Hour Hour . Code In Out In Out In Out 2 1 D Single Family 141 Units 713 713 27 81 92 54 Houses 220 Apartments 204 Units - 688 688' 21 83 85 45 251 Senior Housing 54 Units 160 160 6 10 20 12 (Detached) 252 Senior Housing 17 Units 30 30 0 1 1 1 (Attached) 610 Hospital 60 Beds 354 354 48 20 28 50 620 Nursing Home 68 SF 207 207 14 12 14 15 630 Clinic 18 SF 292 292 35 35 39 57 710 General Offices 98 SF 658 658 163 22 32 157 720 Medical Offices 1 96,700 SF 3,914 3,914 386 102 160 431 820 Retail 176,000 SF 4,903 4 134 86 436 473 Subtotal 11,919 11 834 452 907 1,295 11.5 Internal Capture 1 1,377 74 74 123 123 Total External Trips 10 14 764 378 784 1 34% Pass -By Trips 1 1 33 33 135 135 Net New Trips 9,100 9,100 727 345 650 8 1,03 :j � 10 I *y44om and Amiats, Inc. Board of Commissioners Meeting - �r � r� w� •.. _�.�� -.w y..�W, .. �r� w..w� ...�...�� .�. n... �w . _ .r , ._..�r.. x. .. �,. ..,w� .... ,-- �r�.,u.:�, .w .... �:�.. �.��.w k ............. r �..r.. . ��... rN ,� . 07/02/2012 8 -9 -65 Scotts Hill Village - Afew Hanover County, AfC 5.0 Site Traffic Distribution The proposed generated trips were assigned .to the surrounding roadway network. The directional distribution and assignment are based on existing turning movement counts, land uses and population densities in the area, and discussion with New Hanover County and NCDOT staff: ® 40% to/from the south on US 17 ® 20% to/from the west on the Wilmington Bypass 9 30% to/from the north on US 17 ® 5% to/from the west on Sidbury Road ® 3% to/from the east on Scotts Hill Loop Road (south) ® 1 to/from the east on Scotts Hill Loop Road (north) ■ 1% to/from the west on Connector to Stephens Church Road The site traffi distribution was confirmed with New Hanover County and NCDOT staff. Scenario 1 site traffi assignment is shown in Figure 4. Scenario 1 includes the US 17 widening improvements with a signal at Entrance #1. Scenario 2 has a different traffic assignment, shown in Figure S, due to the proposed locations of the U- Turns. The traffic assignment for Scenario 3, see Figure G, was adjusted for the "Super Street" concept. 12 lit Kimby -Ham � and AssaeiatES, Inc. Board of Commissioners Meeting ..,,�_ ,.....uw..,_�,.�....��w. �.... �.. ��, H. ...��.....4...,.�M�.��.�..�.�� R......._. �..._ � _..,��.�_._....r,,�s...�,_�, , �_ ... �.. ��. ��. �. M...,...,., �.. ��. �., �..... �. �.... �._.. .- �'��,�.�0- ��M.�._.�..... .. ..��:... a .,.a _.....�....��.ti.�1�...�w.�.r�.: �.�M_.k...�........ � �.. ��,._,.,. �.. �_.k..... �.._... �.... �.��......._„_�.�_u.w�..,,..... 8 -9 -66 'ONI 'SXV1OOSSV ONV NNOH— A31WI>l Ol juntevn JLnOH1M1 M 11VHS 'OyI 'S31V13OSSV ONV NWI-I— A31NIH A9 NOLLV1dVOV ONV NOl1VZ180H.LnV N3.UIUM LnOH.LIM 1N3Yif1000 51141 NO 30Nvn3H ?13dONdvjl ONV 3O 35f13N 'O3.YVd3Nd SVM 11 H�IWM HO3 1N3110 ONV 3SOd?Jncl 3141 HX klNO 03(MINI SI '331AH3S 3O 1N3YinWSM NV SV 'N1309 (331NMS jd SNOIS30 ONV Sid33NO3 341 1411M U31413001 '1N31Yn3O0 SIH1 tr G O1?NN30S) 1N3WNOISSV SISX - IVNV 13VdW1 DIJJV8l ' OUI'salePassy PUP WOH -901W 1 3dn�I3 DY NouneNISIG dl?U 30VII IIIH S1103S 6MpyIl I1!1d cuoDs\VlAoftim 1RH siwos ZOObItrZLO\Nd1 :H Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -67 x 0 W O r"7 V7 p H H (H1�JON) z a� GOBI d001 - 111H S11O:DS •— ri mi .k6neajs a� (Hlnos) } MI dQO3 - 111H 511t30S bt Rvz co to n �e a z 0 m C# 30NVdJIN3 n I a a Z J "� D Q 0 m z � tJ in 1i1 Z C) 0 be t� n 1 NO x x X Z# 30NV�JiN3 �Q I` be >` ail Ho6nHD SN3Hd31S Ol 80103NNOD � l # 30NdylN3 r n [n 0 I � i a Gil >133�10 Holn3 to v 6MpyIl I1!1d cuoDs\VlAoftim 1RH siwos ZOObItrZLO\Nd1 :H Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -67 C E c a► of c c 0(D c� o� c o o E o 2 p a► Z C> (D C (D _ C .°_ C j d CL c� p c -o c c c ca E E y E 0 E r- CL o CL o o z o> .0 ] 4' o 0 C 2 C a C a C •- �y L� 0� w a, Qo � '0 Q c c Q° w Q a Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -68 -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — . Porters Neck Road — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- S .A&Aww v 7 — — — — ..... — — — — — — 1! WWW' W 169.50 b - J' 1 11 Ld V� �� S �� y {i owes% A ,W.K" q 7 S 45"4030' E Z62,1.Y (Tctai) — — -. ,.- - — — IS .� � � e-'V 1331 L p capw t, Wil LtiKn*%*. "Y za� 7 j L 6 v Mint -- ------------------ 0 .1 :1 • C5 'D q 1k 13, C) IU j 91 Z -j 0 10 66� Z IL z (L t 0 tu X - NA a V c — u 21 : �-4 a c d c .7 c� IF a6 C9 tj -c .3 0 D6 -6J cl Zk 18 a EX 1 -0 I ,�� N 415'40'30` W 125.26' MA101 WIL • LIT E 4 -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — . Porters Neck Road — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- S .A&Aww v 7 — — — — ..... — — — — — — 1! WWW' W 169.50 b - J' 1 11 Ld V� �� r1r +s � r ► r �� y {i owes% A ,W.K" q S 45"4030' E Z62,1.Y (Tctai) — — -. ,.- - — — IS .� � � e-'V 1331 L p capw t, Wil LtiKn*%*. "Y za� 7 j L 6 v Mint -- ------------------ 1k N 46'4V3(Y* w 139.95' 1 CL NA ?U i I t 8 C9 0 #4 -1GtO*3w w 127.37* 1 cl Zk 18 E 97 v 1 I ,�� N 415'40'30` W 125.26' MA101 WIL • LIT co u! W v �=l Do 92 Ov t , w r N 46'40'30' W 153.63 w rw S 46.40-3W E 14D AV J3 v I Q '4 '5- Z > S 46.40.3v c 5,�� I '? go A --- — 3 — 4 - C 113.7• LA C"embnf of I--- fiG 19 4a 11 C; VF t� c" IPA S .A&Aww v 7 — — — — ..... — — — — — — 1! WWW' W 169.50 b - J' 1 11 Ld Pi r4 5 46"ID" E I93,O41 11 4w40'3w w :SE-1w I r, 4X .� � � e-'V . 1k N 46'4V3(Y* w 139.95' 1 CL NA 8 C9 #4 -1GtO*3w w 127.37* 1 cl Zk 18 E 97 v 1 I ,�� N 415'40'30` W 125.26' MA101 WIL • LIT co u! W v �=l Do 92 Ov t , J3 v Q '4 '5- S 46.40.3v c 5,�� I '? go A --- — 3 — 4 - C 113.7• LA C"embnf of I--- fiG 19 4a 11 C; VF t� c" IPA S .A&Aww v 124357 S 46740 E M b - J' 1 11 Ld Pi r4 5 46"ID" E I93,O41 E � r, 4X .� � � e-'V . i is S 46740 E M 0 0 �� 30 E � r, 4X .� � � e-'V . 1k E s V 0 =a a OL 0 on E rj c r k 31 ra 0 ad g. , I � I un -j 4.0 !E IL 0 fe ]c —0 v ip 0 , q X A. U, Z= 6 , T c ;5 , 0 N F Y 0 H 4 F V a • 9 u -0 -a qu 0 � o k ° � �rc o � us f-v N c -a .9 H 0,0 to r , U- -201 ivs ' k Y i r rp e Err . 2�5 I A r- 15 3k, g-c 43 Y E I IV's 5 :E x 'a- zi v A. c- 0 A C3 w F 31 Ti u ¢ y7* ii.f y� :a w S r le v 3.6 v-1 X Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 0 0 �� 30 E � .� � � e-'V 4 0 0 I! i n I CL NA 8 C9 Zk 18 E 97 v x 'a A r3 co u! W v �=l Do 92 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 Cp V , y De L 0 > 41 VV 4 L -cc 'R r711 N 0 40 0 V R2167 O MAItW UNE T A I r ; 22 4r"4vm* W 134,65' up S 46*4YW E 100.97' S, 11 464038' W 144.17,' �'j � la: 4'7 � • 8 �„ S w � s nh so .32 r7, � �/ ! � 7 11 45 *40'M' of MAN s 4e'14esw F mrnl it 4 a o'w w i L S 4CA6'38' C 11 +1.1 I � l S 46'40'30' r MW lb 4 .j do S 2 V � YZ Yt - •D'o�a riat 3� ..� y � � � 11 W40-3d- W 158.5Z t- c I&E.7Z SA � � � of 46) 40 I 2ij i 0 a H 464(3 W leQ23' 5 48'40'SW E 118.28 0 1 33 R 46'4WW W 192-VY __j I — — — — — — — — — — — T� w r 136.1:r I Laura Drive v- -m \ 47 i Ir 46 :v 195.10' I %�.r � 1 c r � � -, � �+,I Ae�. I S 46'.46'40.38• E '37.30• A r 3 R W4oW r 14&2v — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — 46'4030" E I65.22' I t r r 1 M� b ^ r F y I 'M g 182.32 S 46'4030' F_ F 7 b r s S 46'4&39' C 145.25' 0; 3.1 +V40 w 205.9x ' - -_ - MATO 1 4434E -_ - ------------- Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-70 k ��r FE TZ .2 Ir I c n 0 '4. k ��r S 46140 E 205.9s--- UATCH LNE Ob hL 46 W =40 tn DW.&WI 3 it -C . k g 4 LU IN 14. IR j gl �.r r4 &A C2 W ► I W:i 41 '4hl 4C v L Ld 4f !.tow At Zr • cot eg ti� 4f or AiN r ..• 0 8 a~ y h y'y .. � n � .le v 4e 41 h 41 b 1, .1 la ' �VAPO *14F 41 :' ) FL T IN"�j A ..q S R6 .8, 0 —0 ta _j u U) 0. G 0 fA (D :S 1A 0 10 fL CL C 3: ba — C1 nc� wow 411 C_ yr Old E i Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-71 ► LOVU WWd .09,' aAla(l ulvajjsplj� :.� ! ki - - — - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- — t — — — — — — — ii S 46140 E 205.9s--- UATCH LNE Ob hL 46 W =40 tn DW.&WI 3 it -C . k g 4 LU IN 14. IR j gl �.r r4 &A C2 W ► I W:i 41 '4hl 4C v L Ld 4f !.tow At Zr • cot eg ti� 4f or AiN r ..• 0 8 a~ y h y'y .. � n � .le v 4e 41 h 41 b 1, .1 la ' �VAPO *14F 41 :' ) FL T IN"�j A ..q S R6 .8, 0 —0 ta _j u U) 0. G 0 fA (D :S 1A 0 10 fL CL C 3: ba — C1 nc� wow 411 C_ yr Old E i Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-71 n�aa+v+Nai .•.w. rPU'W"K orl 11t4•! V4 7M [QK['NeatX nurl %WjF. A& • w! o,cr lV'l d ht I S I A i ❑ 8 n 5 t U ry r-- VNf1DY►� Hl�aN AmnoamAoNym M3N dIHSNMOI 1UNW"W" S 'SOJl3Avns I SH3NNVId I SN 39NISN.3 . � C) 1066 9EE DN pja!patuwng of xa8 'p'd a � � a -. -10W s u a iq. .M S311INnwwoD zI31�1 , �o� n x a W r-- & ° G �. � N 1 S S � � Z> 5 � 9 -L23• C7 d. _+ �:►� • § i 2.1 _ x -V y !II , CO m# MRS ! [ WU _ .�► 3 Y3 x{ntlfl �rBfld Y1 Y117 d .M) Rik Y � s fig W . ! id, q Ike =� � sill! ►�, •, r �¢ !! •:� � r ! � ul f p � �'� oc • " all I CL $ "• '1 � � rz vi � .._ .. � •r�p,T..... � IN Pj on ov" ATU "a p It a. LU } Q � r d • .. �7- . fiv., v 4r 11 �• 1[� r 1 i5 i ts g Nz r• w �t t ill a -$ N 0 uo � ,i Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/0 2/20 1 2 rr , - - - -• - w..•__.._•__• 8 -9 -72 L * It Ce • 61 1 - Q " I . 1" 1 0 J 1 1 t; - T rL o;, p -4 .0 its �j P;A.- �4 - 11A Q P �2 ' N' 4 ale 1 S: A 1 7, St . . p It ii H 9R5iS A uj lie A. i w.;w • LS 5i a u el 0 )k '9 0 a L , ;F J ;:,I oi a A Ell. EW z *k pp J L Hi a V. L• : : t -a I e. k, r ' E ! E r ! E I f u L 1 3 h I X. it A i Q -A '4\ 0 11 �11- j 44 A 4,j, r R is z.� i`.y 1 ' i s�, ~ sle`- �si • l a's' Q v, rz [g ot - a3 'S IR � a;�•Z^�.'�•. ladA hC P�,r .•�{:j� •� G � l 4ii �:Y�:'.''� •r ^]�e +� `, fr i �. .0 or kk or. 11 % old I N, Ab N, A 11 N r .. f's7 7.. r r q . , a ,. '/ ,■ , r 1 �] 4C 99 -4- Y V Y Y c :r•Y :1 U Y 4 V Lf LI F V' Y v L G /� �j, G1 r. —;§ wt j 'or Q L Q H L 11 • A 6 V - w d 5; % At Z & M -d6 r p Svt!� k:S t , . iv r I " - e 'l r 10) 1k or it M / IF Oc* j L 1. Ck 31 .i ti � � �r r. % ' � � e r•. � 1rr .] + � y .t � � � l •�� +~ 'r} rr '�r. ,�•" � � •'•Y� �, •.� '.'�• Y t�. � [ , ly �i 2 `V 45 J A N NA 'I fi t'` �• } H Y �I/ r5• �� +n i�__ • �� y. •�-; •j/ 4 ti K r � \ 1 �� le, -af % uk % W, So V n L @g d o C 4 1 ,7 /0 A, % 5* 4, A ol A V A do % I? tGN % () @ 2 G7 1 a ,� �wt ,�f � � r •:r .`�,r �. •c � '< AI �� ti � y3• ,� rf• i r•' yea J, ego A oo I'a4f f . o rj . 44 •. lee -e "1-" -6 0 1 , Vw t % 13 4 >�" r. 4 a � x i' ab' �i �� E '` a r� , tn� 1 q & jp + a. ,y tz . w D I V , o dw� Cc . 4 ( eS or jp I 1L -ol 'OP 3 1 . I G v I k�-!.,G r, fin d.- o or ;r Vv Lr e oIr J 2C • or. A !,4% of 44, -)) A 1 u- (L ;,K Lot 4 LIB 9 pa s e % ce r g ; L.4j - Ts !E 7 TKI lif I ■ N 1 c+ k.5 � rT 4, 1i ;4'.3 Qc CE A f"T< ou te 0 51, W) .44 2 - Al I . r k a I/P �07 *t of , a Qc Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 ,m r� ��'� yr � � � �"— � r� _��,� � �� '- i � � � �.� �F� i^ 7. �•" sr � � Ka• v a F i 9 � Z � � y �y C? Z �2 Om' . x, el— xw - " s, 4rLI IN 4:f�:Y� i � k � � • y' „�� f I 11F if 00*4 Ile N It 11 �N_ MR sr J, aw I H P % ivy -A �Nx y OL 12 41 IIAIML w to . ICA E V 6 - % cq 4%, 1-01 IF ti It 4 41 49 $ • (S Al/ Iq rS W f r f f L4 Y4 t! r Ip s 01N_ � � = w ti y � y � L ,(f h �, ` >>J ' �j ' K, � +G y r ti �} +� ry _� r .�� .� a ` s ^: , �i �' ► ' ► i +t'�. �� ` S ..r ..� tl f f N POE pdj U n ly • 77 I-A P ti A qL • �!% 'tk j;1' f�ti -r'. �� s ��4� � iC� R} �� ' � � i y Z � � RC y i a � ■ ,�� • ! h � r It 16 LL13PJ-V;-' A Sp Ir .;N 4rf,_ tL 14 F , �y t 4- , -, V JSJ& XSK wij, ! N I At 41,1 Al % JN CL k N ILI yp -C P 41' �4 . IF . ;M�x • 4/ co At le IV 4P. PN "10 r 9, CL 16 V M-FLAQ VTX Ap4VIw C4 Ln D J. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-74 Ills 111111 C4 Ln D J. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-74 tA My If Oc t 11 Fp 4� k , 3 f •L+~ L L � ■ '� _C. �� f:•• {• f � •'} Yi '•L ,`1 ~ M'r , ., •y• �• \`•; � ; •� •` .{ 4F J .. q/ rr % In N 4K IZ -P 4 h va 4DI 1. 444 ,i � +t Q i IL ft f ire c N% _j ---J-- 41 f iyY I Wo s VIT 4 2 VO L w UJ 1 6- P C, LU 4 X. 4. % r ta It '. v A LU i,6 UM, I U3 L T cz Ej - 13 S t -,-- - t J f V.. x ear 4j AX ft t- + C-� Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 M. z I LC F t! 1 YE U LU 4 tj d A 2 j u vd v f r r JJ I,I1 f. — P.7 t .,d 4 z ui iw '. 5 1 -.-t ;F - r b ;3 4 Ir i r t .1 V ?. %I Nit d d it 7 1r) t .iDy Z f. tA My If Oc t 11 Fp 4� k , 3 f •L+~ L L � ■ '� _C. �� f:•• {• f � •'} Yi '•L ,`1 ~ M'r , ., •y• �• \`•; � ; •� •` .{ 4F J .. q/ rr % In N 4K IZ -P 4 h va 4DI 1. 444 ,i � +t Q i IL ft f ire c N% _j ---J-- 41 f iyY I Wo s VIT 4 2 VO L w UJ 1 6- P C, LU 4 X. 4. % r ta It '. v A LU i,6 UM, I U3 L T cz Ej - 13 S t -,-- - t J f V.. x ear 4j AX ft t- + C-� Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 1, A � ULIRAG T:c�izs�oz fill act lanlXyszs W est Develo ax.A. Vin R .New Y�N;anovez C ounl- NC. 1?reparcd £oz S - J une 14 20%1 .A S irclitl Dillj C. ni IN-) Ll p 1311 Nick Li 1 . t D (ti ' phjcs b - HiC < " uorl Vjq: PE vnii-ew cl b 1-ofin. Davot Skalcid b tlan. 011:111-bo ft� 4 � . k e * 9 al 49 1 v 5 ; I th vi H'ic MIM1101 0 IL V c's I vrcjll�. Ki llIel led il bl f Ti in c t1w colic'c" 4i 1 q O15 presclitel h Ous :c) I' t- RI f 1 0 1 I'Ll 1 il I I Q �Al .1 fir, -011 WV. wil", PIV131411 Ot 6-: t 11'y ol 11V . 1 . P Q-5V 411% -C d 4111(41 r i 1. 1 IS7 -11.`111 bv- 41 OuL Wj Uh 0 (1 Ak ' !jt t I. UO .1 1 JY OvUl 1 10 v I 110 11 1 1 to PalVi I'll PO I'l. I 1111111SPorlifli0j) C6 I Is i. 1 1111) � f id. r the :0 1100111 hVIWO111 I Dki te -. j.t. - 1 -.111 s-1 wx lit I ioll coosultiog kind. 1110 C.11011t. Oj 1. i .3V �A 04 A I Kt A �; I Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-9-76 lZ q 0:1 ...... J F0R? 4e p j - y , h4AR . -vict lJOAgL -�Tlcq. wir. wn . . ...... .. A ------ —At a ejF te 3- f To r. . ..... .. . � � .. i : �eH -� ��' z r� ') fir`• �_ .��....�.r - s - - � } � �. � �4 k. 7 fir, }fir � r i� � .g '�., `i ° ._ � t � !. r. 3 r . V tA SI f lr�ll 4 lcm I —_.._ � _� fd 4f .�� `' •� � fr ir s � .! } r,�3 ` �1�ei� rr � l � f f COURT C(P-00NUT-:-C(Yjff--:, 1`4 V X 1, vi, tt L ai- fit 11,6 -v: o ........ . . ------- IT I .40 LA 7k, 0 -A -( c �# � � a eS'• £_� f �'a ].i: 14i -1 VIP wv .11-1211 EWA w IN _ --ROSEMARY LANCE 14J fA RL 0-11-ft AL Walil �G -DRAINAGIE.&EROSION CONTROL MMNRIS�v KUSKE Tr.A-,rr3TAl-L- RADING1. [ae�l� =tt�� t'�`�, 1t4l�. �.� THE IREGISTWO. VINEYARD PLATATION c o N't Is 1-f L 1: 1 ;-j c" -PIERF'OHMANCE RESIDUMAL Oil jsx-Ml ... ....... . Board of NEW ! ' AN H. 0. 07/02/2012 8-9-77 v Q )V E �, P _ �.: Plot. 7 g_ , . :'F' A I g - A- -� .4 A Al Niff luAli-i I g - 5 . ----- ----- i A-V ENPO IM i° ��AN'5- VOtf AI R iFNt'�. 4. 2 Tr ip- e n er t -011 4J Trip .Dx_stributlai1 s ite . X' for � se c � i : l l l s lr bLl to Wised �oii Hi a Li tra c p ratterns and en r een. � ' u.�� ''�`�1��1t, Th L�:= P ��;�s l'�'z l'i�� axi_��`�e I for this l � pro'ccl vas= ap d. by-- I _CD . and City off. Wi lin - ilz g ton s tafl an d c a il lie .fo u rid i Figure 5. The direc f I�iz�l �� :tr "b Ci��s f ��y the si��e �-�•�� t�s��l 1a1� tl�� tax ��.�1 ��•e .f I WSA 70% t o pll-cl. fir- oin. the US 17 . 4.4 Exceptions to NCxti :I11ztnti c1rds ITE :* .enerc do p Versi -on. � softwci e �� used Lead �, f Vorsio11 -. Th �S- tll,e p La !e5 t SOf t , � r QT'_ a I , � � o : t . e 11 L� �f�I - of ITI= . i� �t 11 a:1z ., 1 In � � 1t1a1�r this � 1s c _ al x °� � .rovi ed l � NCDOT' hith inc l=c les _ _ 5U- second cycle lee. �l�S �t soill sj 11als. T �i� 1`s below t�I1e: oaz��t c��z Man of 60 scconcis f r -� �: has- traff.lc S - I�Is.. ff 4,*5 T.0tal.7raff.I.0 } R '1�i1 }? - c � build- t 1 ' ff c � -s obta `�1 � :l 1 1��1 l c:, l� sto]. I � rolovtl . t oaf f is vol�x�� es � d tfiw � Vic: t��:f� volumes due to �hc proposed prQlecf. Fi tees - :.��11t� ins - the 2015 P;uturc - o Bu ld volt m -es .fogy DTI M 1 -c l I T c �_k ,. Figure 7 shows 1he sr tC-:tr s ei1era ed b' f this dev elo men l t urw g the AM end. TAM ezi.kS, and the 21013 Rituxe d voIt1.11.1cs. or tie. AM. and TAM peza s, TO 06[14/(71.0. TO 22.5-Ninel e.0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -78 I-'l -icy T :stit«te of 1 r ns ort fio ELF _ in -tiers - ( ITE) Tri p enen -a - n so -ft a-re eras 1 1-sold to dev c o p the. proj c ted t.rtps- cre-rate cll bY t his d e welopment. Ta LEI c 4.2 the results.:., AM I PM PEAKS M N �- r 54 - f 3 St6p hel -c In; r 0 -- _ _ F .0W.) . t re k: R oad- Road 0: 1 .0- C5. Q u t17 .r 0 AM I PM PEAKS M N �- 54 - f 3 St6p hel -c In; r 0 -- _ _ F .0W.) . t re k: R oad- Road 0: 1 .0- o t17 .r tl3 i I t-� W M # ** NOT TO SCALE This OCURI t0901 Or tivillt thO COMOptu W)d lesi�� «;�: teseittc�f l �:rair�: is inlanded only for :11 spatif is purport and cl ionlL for which it wn prop Ind Rama nf irexproper ralinnce o.r#; 1111S (1,0 i 1m ant b.v Vli without w(I 1 nutlibriz9tion and sdapintion by Daven -poff Tranarlfitgr� ! ?�] �'V1tIL311 �slCitY. icy D vanport'rranspurt�tion Consulting and 15hall be. a Violation - ilia. a0rr 0 betwoon Uavenporl T►arisfxxtol Consulting and tho client. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -79 I�1 BLAQ K .- EXISTING GREEN COMMITTED ti W SPEED 13 JJ NOS 7 SQAL.E Tjl :clgc. uma.nl, . togathox wilh I tio concepts and dustgns. prase tact 11' Hirt, is intended only for this spubric plupose and client or w hich 11 was ptepar(jd, lleuse of. nr. i!nprap�r roltance on, (his . tlacct "enl 1w *zithers without w6tterl aullia izatiorr pnd ada tit on ley Davoopit Tr Consulling thall ba. WA110ut lialAty. to Daven.pad ;rv Cansulling. and tali € o n vivlalivn of lho agrectilent between Davenport FranS�aita[ion �san5filttnti D nd llw client: Futch Creek Road SPEED LIMIT Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -80 Fu tch Creek Road Market Street Futch Creek Road US 17 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freewa3 (I -140) Shiraz Way Porters Neck r J l.I � Road Porters y Neck Road Edgewater Club Road .- r- r- r- Signalized Intersection US 17 Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection N Stephens v Church Road Futch (� Creek 00 Road 00 0 N US 17 Fu tch Creek Road Market Street Futch Creek Road US 17 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freewa3 (I -140) Shiraz Way Porters Neck r J l.I � Road Porters y Neck Road Edgewater Club Road .- r- r- r- Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -81 Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) Porters Neck Road (SR 1491) Lion .ng e RAMEY KEMP Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -81 Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402) Porters Neck Road (SR 1491) Lion .ng e RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES FUTCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT Wilmington, North Carolina Adjacent Development Trips - Scotts Hill Village Scale: Not to Scale Figure B -1 US 17 Futch Creek Road Market Stephens Church N L Road 1 Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak - Futch �} t Creek Po rters �1 (� Neck Road US 17 'u } Futch Creek Road Market 1/4 Neck Street Road Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Figure B -2 Po rters �1 (� Neck 312 � Futch Creek Road US 17 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way Edgewater Club Road r- rr rr r r r rr r� rr r rr r _r 'r r rr Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) 4— Porters 1/4 Neck Roundabout Intersection Road Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Figure B -2 Po rters �1 (� Neck 312 � Road Edgewater Club Road r- rr rr r r r rr r� rr r rr r _r 'r r rr Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -82 Lion ng e RAMEY KEMP Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -82 Lion ng e RAMEY KEMP 0 Y ASSOCIATES FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT Wilmington, North Carolina Adjacent Development Trips - Porters Crossing Residential Development Scale: Not to Scale Figure B -2 Futch Creek Road Market X 11 Street T Futch Creek Road US 17 I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (1.144) Shiraz Way Porters Neck t �-- 114 Road T f i i P orter s Neck 413 --� Road Edgewater Club Road r- r� r- r! .- r r rr r r- r- .- rr Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1442) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1442) (SR 1491) Signalized Intersection US 17 Stephens Church N Road T T Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Futch Creek Road US 17 Futch Creek Road Market X 11 Street T Futch Creek Road US 17 I Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (1.144) Shiraz Way Porters Neck t �-- 114 Road T f i i P orter s Neck 413 --� Road Edgewater Club Road r- r� r- r! .- r r rr r r- r- .- rr Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1442) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1442) (SR 1491) Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -83 lion ng e RAMEY KEMP Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -83 lion ng e RAMEY KEMP ~ ASSOCIATES FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT Wilmington, North Carolina Adjacent Development Trips - Porters Pointe Residential Development Scale: Not to Scale Figure B -3 US 17 Signalized Intersection Futch Creek Road Stephens Church n Sam Road Market f 2/5 Futch Street Creek Po rters ° Road TO US 17 -�� 0517 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way Signalized Intersection Futch Creek Road i Neck Roundabout Intersection Market f 2/5 Street Po rters TO t 'Road Futch Creek Road -�� 0517 Med Bre John Jai Burney J Freeway (I -140) Shiraz Way I Edgewater Club Road .r r - � r- r �r r r - r- r- r- Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Signalized Intersection Porters Unsignalized Intersection Neck Roundabout Intersection Road f 2/5 Po rters Neck 28/94 'Road I Edgewater Club Road .r r - � r- r �r r r - r- r- r- Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -84 Lion ng e RAMEY KEMP Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -84 Lion ng e RAMEY KEMP ASSOCIATES 0 FUTCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT Wilmington, North Carolina Adjacent Development Trips - W aterstone at Porters Neck Scale: Not to Scale Figure B -4 am - 3111 US 17 Road r N � Market 0 �o ao i Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Street Stephens lqt Church r J L� 54135 Road .� Futch Creek Road Futch t (� Creek US G\ Road 17 3 - 3111 Futch Creek Road ✓-- Road r Q Market 0 �o ao i Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Street r (� Neck 54135 � 916 .� Futch Creek Road E02 I I US 17 Med Bre John Ja: Burney J Freewa] (1 -140) Shiraz Way Edgewater Club Road r- r- r- r- _r r- Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) LEGEND - 3111 Porters �, Neck ✓-- Road r Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak P orter s (� Neck Road Edgewater Club Road r- r- r- r- _r r- Porters Neck Road Shiraz (SR 1402) Way Edgewater Club Road Porters Neck Road (SR 1402) (SR 1491) LEGEND ASSOCIATES Signalized Intersection Q Unsignalized Intersection Q Roundabout Intersection XX/XX Traffic Volumes - AM Peak / PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -85 tion ng e RAM EY KE M P ASSOCIATES FLITCH CREEK DEVELOPMENT Wilmington, North Carolina Adjacent Development Trips - Registry at Vineyard Plantation Scale: Not to Scale Figure B -5 APPENDIX C CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS US 17 FLITCH CREEK ROAD/ STEPHENS CHURCH ROAD Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -86 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Lane Groff EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r tt r Volume (vph) 0 47 0 0 0 226 0 820 65 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539, 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 97 72 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 52 0 0 0 251 0 911 72 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 52 0 0 0 251 0 911 72 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 11.6 11.6 28.4 28.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.57 0.57 v1c Ratio 0.12 0.56 0.45 0.08 Control delay 14.6 15.0 7.7 2.3 Queue delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 14.6 15.0 7.7 2.3 LOS B B A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -87 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Tragic Conditions k%w t /00 \NP A/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 14.6 7.3 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 39 69 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 84 125 14 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 559 551 2009 930 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.46 0.45 0.08 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type; Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.1 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -88 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions -*Nv 'r *%%*- A\ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r tt r Volume (vph) 0 44 0 0 0 119 0 1558 104 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0, 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 92 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 49 0 0 0 132 0 1731 116 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 49 0 0 0 132 0 1731 116 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 11.8 11.8 52.0 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.74 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.46 0.66 0.10 Control Delay 24.6 27.4 8.2 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.6 27.4 8.2 1.9 LOS C C A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -89 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 24.6 7.8 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 18 45 191 3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 87 336 19 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 532 472 2627 1199 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.28 0.66 0.10 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) t o __ o2 o4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -90 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions ,pop* --IN- %%* 'r k' A Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r tt r Volume (vph) 0 56 0 0 0 308 0 1158 88 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 FIt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 34 98 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 62 0 0 0 342 0 1287 98 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic °lo} Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 62 0 0 0 342 0 1 287 98 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.o 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2,0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.7 13.7 26.3 26.3 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.53 0.53 v1c Ratio 0.12 0.73 0.69 0.11 Control Delay 13.6 25.4 11.8 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.6 25.4 11.8 2.3 LOS B C B A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -91 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 13.6 11.1 Approach LOS B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 77 140 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 #176 204 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 559 507 1859 878 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.67 0.69 0.11 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 59 Actuated Cycle Length: 59 Offset: 9 (gala), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 59 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 9.13 Intersection Signal delay: 13.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 11 (NB) o2 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2915) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -92 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR , _. Lane Configurations t r tt r _ _ Volume (vph) 0 61 0 0 0 169 0 1954 166 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 116 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 68 0 0 0 188 0 2171 184 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic °la} Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 68 0 0 0 188 0 2171 184 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 . -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0, 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.3 14.3 45.7 45.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.65 0.65 vlc Ratio 0.18 0.56 0.94 0.17 Control Delay 22.4 30.2 22.8 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.4 30.2 22.8 2.9 LOS C C C A Synch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -93 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions kww t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 22.4 21.2 Approach LOS C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 71 376 9 Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 119 #688 36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 532 465 2312 1075 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.40 0.94 0.17 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) t 4 i m2 m4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -94 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions 4 / 0- Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r tt r Volume (vph) 0 103 0 0 0 439 0 1158 308 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 34 342 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 114 0 0 0 488 0 1287 342 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 114 0 0 0 488 0 1287 342 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.3 15.3 24.7 24.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.49 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.94 0.74 0.36 Control Delay 14.3 48.6 13.2 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.3 48.6 13.2 2.2 LOS B D B A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc, Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -95 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Combine (2 T Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 14.3 10.9 Approach LOS B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 129 140 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 #293 204 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 571 517 1770 963 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.94 0.73 0.36 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50. Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. )plits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) t o2 o4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -96 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (N13) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR wBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r tt r Volume (vph) 0 88 0 0 0 434 0 1954 283 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 275 100 100 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.885 0.850 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1883 0 0 0 1811 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1883 0 0 0 1811 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd. Flow (RTOR) 8 198 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 288 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 10.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 98 0 0 0 482 0 2171 314 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 98 0 0 0 482 0 2171 314 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (°I°) 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 84.3% 84.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2,0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.18 1.04 1.07 0.32 Control Delay 20.0 79.4 80.8 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.0 79.4 80.8 3.9 LOS B E E A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -97 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions foe t /P. Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 20.0 53.6 Approach LOS B D Queue Length 50th (ft) 31 —228 560 21 Queue Length 95th (ft) 65 #402 #694 55 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 532 465 2022 989 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.18 1.04 1.07 0.32 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: ?g Actuated Cycle Length: ?g Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vtc Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 56.6 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 144.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. )plits and Phases: 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) o2 o4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -98 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: F utch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions wl Improvements -.00 -0- - % v 'r 4 * , . , - 4 N / 0 0 \1P. A/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR wBL wBT wBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r tt r Volume (vph) 0 86 0 0 0 434 0 1954 283 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1944 1900 1944 1900 1944 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) o p Q Q p 125 p p Storage Lanes o 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 144 199 149 199 144 275 144 144 Lane Util. Factor 1.44 1.44 1.99 1.44 1.49 1.99 1.94 4.95 1.94 1.44 1.99 1.44 Frt 4.865 9.854 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 9 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1863 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No Yes Yes No Satd, Flow (RTOR) 6 145 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 204 543 286 828 Travel Time (s) 3.1 8.2 3.5 19.3 Peak Hour Factor 4.94 4.94 9.94 9.99 4.94 9.94 4.99 4.99 9.99 9.99 9.94 4.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 0 0 0 482 o 2171 314 0 0 9 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 0 0 0 482 o 2171 314 0 0 0 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 4 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.4 14.4 Minimum Split (s) 14.4 14.9 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 36.9 0.0 64.4 69.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 37.5% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 9.0% 62.5% 62.5% 0.0% 9.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 29.0 29.0 53.4 53.4 Yellow Time (s) 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Alf -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.4 15.4 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 34.4 34.4 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 39.4 39.4 55.6 55.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 9.58 4.58 vlc Ratio 4.16 9.94 1.46 0.32 Control Delay 24.3 59.8 59.3 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.3 59.8 59.3 6.4 LOS C E E A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -99 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 11: Futch Creek Road & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 24.3 52.6 Approach LOS C D Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 278 —778 46 Queue Length 95th (ft) 80 #474 #916 93 Internal Link Dist (ft) 124 463 206 748 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 Base Capacity (vph) 602 524 2051 978 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.92 1.06 0.32 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 96 Actuated Cycle Length: 96 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.06 Intersection Signal Delay: 52.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 144.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. apias ana rnases: 'vi: ruicn UreeK r%oaa & uo 'i t km5) t* o2 o4 I Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -100 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Ste hens church Read & US 17 (S B) Existing (2011 ) Traffic Conditions -OA --,N. %*V fe - k. q\ \P0 I/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 11 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1692 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100. 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 427 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 6.5 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1880 1 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1880 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split °IQ} 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.4 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 9.0 62.4 62.4 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.89 0.89 v1c Ratio 0.06 0.04 0.60 0.00 Control Delay 15.5 27.2 1,3 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.5 27.2 1.3 1.0 LOS B C A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -101 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Existing (2017) Traffic conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 27.3 1.3 Approach LOS C A .Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 3 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 16 69 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 469 532 3155 1411 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.02 0.60 0.00 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 23 (33 %) Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Signal Delay: 1.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. )plits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) 0 6 �%r 08 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -102 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions -0-A --p. %v 4e +-- 4 %ft 4\ \1P 4d Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 11 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 1331 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 19 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 187 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 2.8 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1479 1 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1479 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23,0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 9.0 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.85 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.05 0.49 0.00 Control Delay 7.7 17.5 0.9 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.7 17.5 0.9 0.0 LOS A B A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -103 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Lane Group. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 17.5 0.9 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 4 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 16 16 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 107 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 497 559 3001 1343 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.03 0.49 0.00 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 48 (96 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49 Intersection Signal delay: 1,1 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. )plits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) 06 08 _ c Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -104 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions -.A 10- *Nv f - pw . 4 %..' A\ \1P A/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 12 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2050 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 427 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 6.5 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2278 1 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2278 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 9.0 62.4 62.4 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.89 0.89 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.04 0.72 0.00 Control Delay 23.8 27.2 3.2 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.8 27.2 3.2 1.0 LOS C C A A Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -105 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 27.2 3.2 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 4 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 16 m113 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 463 532 3153 1410 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.03 0.02 0.72 0.00 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 23 (33 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile - queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) U ■ r, - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp &Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -106 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Condi -,#Fp* --bp --- fe '%. 4\ /00 \P. -4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1850 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 1.00 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0,865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 187 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 2.8 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2056 1 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2056 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 9.0 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.85 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.05 0.69 0.00 Control Delay 15.2 17.5 4.9 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.2 17.5 4.9 1.0 LOS B B A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -107 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions 'k- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 17.5 4.9 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 4 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 17 #432 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 107 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 486 559 3000 1342 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.69 0.00 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 48 (96 %), Referenced to phase 6 :SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) 06 08 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -108 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions --A --I. - % v 'r 4 %.- . 4\ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 12 0 9 0 0 4 0 0 2158 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (fl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (fl) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (fl) 427 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 6.5 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 13 . 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2398 1 Shared Lane Traffic ° lo} Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2398 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 18.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.4 9.0 62.4 62.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.89 0.89 vlc Ratio 0.06 0.04 0.76 0.00 Control Delay 24.8 27.2 4.0 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.8 27.2 4.0 1.0 LOS C C A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -109 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions 4 % t / 110 \pp 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 27.2 3.9 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 4 1 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 16 m84 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 462 532 3153 1410 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.02 0.76 0.00 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 23 (33 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal delay: 4.2 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service a Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) 06 08. Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -110 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Groue EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t tt r Volume (vph) 0 0 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 2069 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes No No No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 187 248 1371 238 Travel Time (s) 2.8 3.8 17.0 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2299 1 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2299 1 Turn Type custom Perm Protected Phases 8 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 14.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 13.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 Recall Mode None None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 9.0 42.4 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0:18 0.85 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.05 0..77 0.00 Control Delay 16.3 17.5 6.7 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.3 17.5 6.7 1.0 LOS B B A A Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -111 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (S13) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay 17.5 6.7 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 4 30 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 17 m72 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 107 168 1291 158 Turn Bay Length (ft) 80 Base Capacity (vph) 485 559 3000 1342 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.77 0.00 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 59 Actuated Cycle Length: 59 Offset: 48 (96 %), Referenced to phase 6: SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 69 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 9.77 Intersection Signal delay: 6.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. )plits and Phases: 12: Stephens Church Road & US 17 (SB) s 06 06 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined ( 2915) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -112 APPENDIX D CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS US 17' MEDIAN U- TURNS Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -113 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (N B) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions -,#Pp* - W.%v 1\ I I/ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 8 0 0 859 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Fit Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link distance (ft) 100 100 857 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ad j. Flow (vph) 9 0 0 955 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 0 0 955 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.010 Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23,0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 5.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 45.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.92 vlc Ratio 0.03 0.30 Control delay 17.2 1.1 Queue delay 0.0 0.0 Total delay 17.2 1.1 LOS B A Approach delay 17.3 1.1 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 0 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011 ) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -114 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Tragic Conditions Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.30 Intersection Signal Delay: 1.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period .(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) o2 o4 } r Synch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Tragic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -115 -wer* -%%* 4\ t A/ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 3270 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.30 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.30 Intersection Signal Delay: 1.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period .(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) o2 o4 } r Synch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Tragic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -115 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions -...A -*%* A\ 44 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 6 0 0 1624 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 100 867 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 0 0 1804 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 0 0 1804 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2A -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 66.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.95 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.54 Control Delay 27.2 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 27.2 1.5 LOS C A Approach Delay 27.2 1.5 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -116 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Existing (20'1 '1) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54 Intersection Signal delay: 1.6 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.'1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) I m2 '' m4 � Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (201 1) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -117 -OA - N* 1\ I .4/ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 136 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 3347 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.54 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54 Intersection Signal delay: 1.6 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.'1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) I m2 '' m4 � Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (201 1) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -117 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions --0A -- sv 4\ 4 1 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 9 0 0 1222 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770. 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 100 867 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 0 0 1358 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 0 0 1358 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2,0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 46.2 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.18 0.92 vlc Ratio 0.03 0.42 Control -Delay 17.3 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.3 2.2 LOS B A Approach Delay 17.3 2.2 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -118 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) m2 m4 owns MW Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -119 -OA - N* . 4\ t t 4/ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 139 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 3270 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.42 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: N BT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 splits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) m2 m4 owns MW Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -119 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions t - N* � Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 7 0 0 2034 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 100 867 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 0 0 2260 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 0 0 2260 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 66.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.95 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.68 Control Delay 27.3 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 OA Total Delay 27.3 3.3 LOS C A Approach Delay 27.3 3.3 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -120 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 N B Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. SrAts and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -121 -OA A\ t * Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 m227 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 3347 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.68 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. SrAts and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -121 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions -FOA -Nv 4\ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 9 0 0 1245 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 100 867 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 0 0 1383 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ° lo} Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 0 0 1383 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60,0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Ali -Red Time (s) .2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 46.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.92 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.42 Control Delay 17.3 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.3 2.1 LOS B A Approach Delay 17.3 2.1 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -122 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn C rossover & US 17 ( NB Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.2 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. �piits ana rnases: zi : u- i urn crossover & u5 I r (Nb) o2 o4 INBORN=; j Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Tragic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -123 -.-PA *N* 1\ t 4 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 m130 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 3270 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.42 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.2 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. �piits ana rnases: zi : u- i urn crossover & u5 I r (Nb) o2 o4 INBORN=; j Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Tragic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -123 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions '00 - N* 1\ Lane Grou EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 7 0 0 2081 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0:95 1.00 1.00 F rt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 3539 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 100 867 Travel Time (s) 4.5 1.2 10.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 0 0 2312 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 0 0 2312 0 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 66.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.95 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.69 Control Delay 27.3 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 27.3 2.8 LOS C A Approach Delay 27.3 2.8 Approach LOS C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -124 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. aplits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) o2 o4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -125 - W.%* 4\ t * Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 m183 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 20 787 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 3347 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.69 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. aplits and Phases: 21: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (NB) o2 o4 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -125 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions 4e 4 % , - / 00 . \00 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 177 0 0 0 0 1562 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 197 0 0 0 0 1736 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 197 0 0 0 0 1736 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) OA 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.1 45.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.66 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.75 Control Delay 30.5 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.5 11.8 LOS C B Approach Delay 30.5 11.8 Approach LOS C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 226 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -126 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.7% ICU Level of Service a Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -127 fe 4 %*- t /'P \ *0. Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) 125 390 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 2322 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.75 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.7% ICU Level of Service a Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -127 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creel{ (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011 ) Traffic Conditions < 4 %w- Lane Grou WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations I tt Volume (vph) 53 0 0 0 0 1322 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 At Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 59 0 0 0 0 1469 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 0 0 0 0 1469 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 38.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.54 Control delay 18.5 5.8 Queue delay 0.0 0.0 Total delay 18.5 5.8 LOS B A Approach delay 18.5 5.8 Approach LOS B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 119 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -128 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 54 Offset: 37 (74 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 4.54 Intersection Signal delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) o6 08 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -129 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) 38 194 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 2712 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.54 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 54 Offset: 37 (74 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 4.54 Intersection Signal delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) o6 08 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -129 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Irp 4 %-- /00 \PP Lane Group__ ___ WIIBL WIIBR NBT NBR - SBL SBT Lane Configurations '� _ tt ^ _.,........,._..._. Volume (vph) 243 0 0 0 0 1863 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 270 0 0 0 0 2070 Shared Lane Traffic °14} Lane Group Flow (vph) 270 0 0 0 0 2070 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 43.6 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.23 0.62 v1c Ratio 0.65 0.94 Control Delay 31.6 24.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.6 24.0 LOS C C Approach Delay 31.6 24.0 Approach LOS C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 381 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -130 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 ( Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase 6: SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 6.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) r 0 r -: r::...... -.... __... _ . -_ . ..... ........ _:- ::_:__:- ::- :- :.:__ -- _ .... - --- :..: -:.__4 ...:.:.... . r Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-9-131 i Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) 167 #644 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 2206 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.53 0.94 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase 6: SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated- Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 6.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) r 0 r -: r::...... -.... __... _ . -_ . ..... ........ _:- ::_:__:- ::- :- :.:__ -- _ .... - --- :..: -:.__4 ...:.:.... . r Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-9-131 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions s- � t r \P0 1 Lane Group `NBL `NBR N BT N BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ' tt Volume (vph) 89 0 0 0 0 1822 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prat) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Fit Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ad j. Flow (vph) 99 0 0 0 0 2024 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 0 0 0 0 2024 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15,0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 37.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.75 v/c Ratio 0.28 0.76 Control delay 18.9 12.0 Queue delay 0.0 0.0 Total delay 18.9 12.0 LOS B B Approach delay 18.9 12.0 Approach LOS B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 226 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -132 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 56 Actuated Cycle Length: 56 Offset: 37 (74 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 66 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 6,76 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Dplits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 08 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -133 fo. '14%, t /P. \P. Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 #471 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 2667 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.76 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 56 Actuated Cycle Length: 56 Offset: 37 (74 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 66 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 6,76 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Dplits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 08 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -133 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U - Turn Crossover & US 17 (SBJ Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions r � t � `► 1 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 351 6 6 6 6 1916 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1966 1966 1966 1966 1966 1966 Lane Util. Factor 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 6.95 Frt Flt Protected 6.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1776 6 6 6 6 3539 Flt Permitted 6.956 . Satd. Flow (perm) 1776 6 6 6 6 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 166 695 166 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 6.96 6.96 6.96 6.96 6.96 6.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 396 6 6 6 6 2122 Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 6 6 6 6 2122 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.6 14.6 Minimum Split (s) 14.6 21.6 Total Split (s) 25.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 45.6 Total Split ( %) 35.7% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 64.3% Maximum Green (s) 18.6 38.6 Yellow Time (s) 5.6 5.6 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2,6 -2.6 Total Lost Time (s) 5.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 5.6 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.6 6.6 Minimum Gap (s) 2.6 6.6 Time Before Reduce (s) 6.6 15.6 Time To Reduce (s) 6.6 36.6 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.9 41.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 6.27 6.59 vlc Ratio 6.82 1.62 Control Delay 39.3 42.5 Queue Delay 6.6 6.6 Total Delay 39.3 42.5 LOS D D Approach Delay 39.3 42.5 Approach LOS D D Queue Length 56th (ft) 153 -536 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -134 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 79 Actuated Cycle Length: 79 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase S:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 99 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) m6 1 4 , 08 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2915) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -135 Irp 4 %w , t /P \Do Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) #283 #670 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 506 2078 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 1.02 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 79 Actuated Cycle Length: 79 Offset: 13 (19 %), Referenced to phase S:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 99 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) m6 1 4 , 08 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2915) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -135 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions f op t t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 308 0 0 0 0 1847 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 342 0 0 0 0 2052 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 342 0 0 0 0 2052 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 Total Split ( %) 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2,0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2A -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2,0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 26.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.70 1.11 Control Delay 24.8 73.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.8 73.3 LOS C E Approach Delay 24.8 73.3 Approach LOS C E Queue Lengt 5 0th (ft) 85 -393 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -136 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions f ..- t t \00 1 Lane Group .. WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) #161 #515 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 531 1855 Starvation Cap Reductn o 0 Spillback Cap Reductn o 0 Storage Cap Reductn o p Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 1.11 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 37 (74 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11 Intersection Signal Delay: 66.4 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 0 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -137 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 308 0 0 0 0 1847 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 0 0 0 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 15 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 100 695 100 Travel Time (s) 4.5 8.6 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 342 0 0 0 0 2052 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 342 0 0 0 0 2052 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 Total Split ( %) 28.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 71.1 Maximum Green (s) 15.0 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 6.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 30.0 Recall Mode None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.7 49.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.89 Control Delay 53.9 18.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 53.9 18.2 LOS D B Approach Delay 53.9 18.2 Approach LOS D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 156 375 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -138 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (S13) Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w/ Improvements Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 65 (86 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 06 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w1 Improvements PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -139 fe *%w- t ep \Do. Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Queue Length 95th (ft) #298 #530 Internal Link Dist (ft) 20 615 20 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 396 2294 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.86 0.89 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 65 (86 %), Referenced to phase 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. splits and Phases: 22: U -Turn Crossover & US 17 (SB) 06 06 Syn ch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions w1 Improvements PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -139 APPENDIX E CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS MARKET STREET 1 �1 FUTCH CREEK ROAD Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -140 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch Creek Road Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations 10 117 76 Volume Left 9 M ovement EBL EBR NB NBT SBT S BR Lane Configurations 10 117 76 Volume Left 9 Volume (veh /h) 8 1 1 104 51 17 Sign Control Stop 1524 1700 Free Free Grade 0% Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 1 1 116 57 19 Pedestrians A Intersection Summary Lane Width (ft) Average Delay 0.5 Walking Speed (ft/s) 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Percent Blockage 15 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflicting volume 184 66 76 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 184 66 76 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 100 100 cM capacity (veh /h) 805 998 1524 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 10 117 76 Volume Left 9 1 0 Volume Right 1 0 19 cSH 822 1524 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.00 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.4 0.1 0.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.4 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -141 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch Creek Road Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions --0A -%%* 4\ t Volume Left 4 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations` 14 70 110 Volume Left 13 Volume (vehlh) 12 1 1 62 95 4 Sign Control Stop 1480 1700 Free Free Grade 0% Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 1 1 69 106 4 Pedestrians A Intersection Summa Lane Width (ft) Average Delay 0.7 Walking Speed (ftls) 15.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Percent Blockage 15 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 179 108 110 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 179 108 110 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 100 100 cM capacity (vehlh) 810 946 1480 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 14 70 110 Volume Left 13 1 0 Volume Right 1 0 4 cSH 819 1480 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.00 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.5 '0.1 0.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.5 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -142 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch .Creek Read Background (2015) Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations Y 133 104 4 1� Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 133 104 4 1� Volume (vehth) 63 9 3 117 57 37 Sign Control Stop 1487 1700 Free Free Grade 0% Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 70 10 3 130 63 41 Pedestrians B Intersection Summa Lane Width (ft) Average Delay 2.6 Walking Speed fts) 19.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Percent Blockage 15 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 221 84 104 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 221 84 104 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 91 99 100 cM capacity (vehth) 766 975 1487 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 80 133 104 Volume Left 70 3 0 Volume Right 10 0 41 cSH 787 1487 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.00 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 0 Control Delay (s) 10.1 0.2 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 10.1 0.2 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summa Average Delay 2.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -143 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch Creek Road Background (2015) Traffic Conditions ---a* - s* -4\ t *T 4/ Movement EBL E BR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y *T 1� Volume (vehth) 49 7 11 70 107 65 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 54 8 12 78 119 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed fts) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 257 155 191 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 257 155 191 tc, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 92 99 99 cM capacity (vehth) 725 891 1383 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 62 90 191 Volume Left 54 12 0 Volume Right 8 0 72 cSH 742 1383 1700 Volume to capacity 0.08 0.01 0.11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 1 0 Control delay (s) 10.3 1.1 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach delay (s) 10.3 1.1 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summa Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Background (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -144 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch Creek Road Combined (2415) Traffic conditions Lane Configurations " 186 130 Volume Left 70 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations " 186 130 Volume Left 70 Volume (veh /h) 63 9 3 164 84 37 Sign Control Stop 1455 1700 Free Free Grade 0% Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 4.90 4.90 0.94 Hourly flow rate (vph) 70 10 3 182 89 41 Pedestrians B Intersection Summary Lane Width (ft) Average Delay 2.2 Walking Speed (ft /s) 21.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Percent Blockage 15 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 298 109 130 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 298 109 130 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 90 99 100 cM capacity (veh /h) 691 944 1 455 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 80 186 130 Volume Left 70 3 0 Volume Right 10 0 41 cSH 715 1455 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.00 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 Control Delay (s) 10.7 0.2 OA Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 10.7 0.2 OA Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -145 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 3: Market Street & Futch Creek Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions -.Per* - sv. 1\ t *T .4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y *T 1� Volume (veh /h) 49 7 11 95 154 65 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 54 8 12 106 171 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 337 207 243 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 337 207 243 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 92 99 99 cM capacity (veh /h) 652 833 1323 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 62 118 243 Vo.l u me Left 54 12 0 Volume Right 8 0 72 cSH 670 1323 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.01 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 1 0 Control Delay (s) 10.9 0.9 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 10.9 0.9 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summar Average Delay 1.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Tragic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-9.-146 APPENDIX F CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS PORTERS NECK ROAD EDGEWATER CLUB ROAD /SHIRAZ WAY Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -147 MOVEMENT SUMMARY site Existing (2011) AM Peak ... . .. ....... ..... .. . Intersection of Porters Neck Road &Edgewater Club Road Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions - AM Peak Roundabout _ - South: Ed evva :- :lub- Ro'a'd -_ NB = =__ g } 2. - --= _.- _= _==--= -__ - -_ _ __ _ == _ = ..... .... : = - : -_ . - :::: _ __;: = _ _ ___ _- -` _ __ : . . 6.63 6.75 32.5 x 3L L 183 2. 0 .228 15.3 LOS B 1.5 38.7 6.44 6.74 30.8 8T T 13 2. 0 .236 9.1 LOS A 1.5 38.7 6.44 6.57 33.6 ......... .. 8R R 9 2. 0 0 .228 16.1 LOS B 1.5 38.7 6.44 0.6 36.1 Approach 266 2. 0 .228 14.7 LOS B 1.5 38.7 6.44 6.72 31.1 ...:. -:... - ..::........ . ... - r East.: Porte s_Neck Road: WB .,.:, . .. .... -.. .. . . LOS B - - - - = - - 0.56 _ 1L L 3 2. 0 .363 15.7 LOS B 2.2 56.9 6.53 6.84 31.2 - 6T T 246 2. 0 .291 9.6 LOS A 2.2 56.9 6.53 6.64 33.7 6R R 1 2. 0 .278 10 .5 LOS B 2 .2 56.9 6.53 6.68 33.6 Approach 256 2. 0 .291 9.7 LOS B 2.2 56.9 6.53 6.64 33.7 orth. Shy a Road �S } 7L L 1 2. 0 .185 17.3 LOS B 1.2 36.5 6.63 6.84 36.6 4T T 3 2. 0 .175 11.1 LOS B 1.2 36.5 6.63 6.71 32.9 4R R 117 2. 0 .175 12.2 LOS B 1.2 36.5 6.63 6.75 32.5 Approach 121 2. 0 .175 12.2 LOS B 1.2 36.5 6.63 6.75 32.5 x 1Nest= :P -orters Neck -;Road : EB _ _ __ - _ _ 5L L 24 2. 0 .265 13.7 LOS B 1.6 41.0 6.67 6.87 31.9 2T T 181 2. 0 .265 7.5 LOS A 1.6 41.6 6.67 6.56 36.1 2R R 91 2.0 0.265 8.4 LOS A 1. 41.6 6.67 6.59 35.3 Approach 297 2. 0 .265 8.3 LOS B 1.6 41.6 6.07 0.56 35-5 All Vehicles , =873 = - - ... ............ 2. D o o 0 .7 . LAS B . .� 5 � 9 _ .0.37: x.65 33.4 Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay ): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM ). Level of Service (Worst Movement ): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:01 PM Copyright 02000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1 104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: S:\2011 Projects \11153 Futch Creek - vlllmington, N C\TIA\An a lysis\Ro u n d a bout Analysis\275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SIP 8009474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING D � AM I Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -148 MOVEMENT SUMMARY site Existing (2011} PM Peak --- -------- Intersection of Porters Neck Road &Edgewater Club Road Existing (2011) Traffic Conditions - PM Peak Roundabout 3L L 154 2.9 0.212 16.3 LOS B 1.4 35.1 9.54 0.78 30.3 8T T 9 2.0 0.212 10.1 LOS B 1.4 35.1 0.54 0.65 33.0 8R R 6 2.0 0.214 11.1 LOS B -------- 1.4 - ------- 35.1 0.54 0.69 32.8 Approach 169 2.0 0.211 15.8 LOS B 1.4 35.1 0.54 0.77 30.5 .:..:. ......::..... East: Porters - Neck Road WB = �. 2.0 0.329 _ LOS A 3.0 _ 0.09 0.58 35.2 1L L 4 2.0 0.342 15.7 LOS B 2.8 70.1 0.55 0.83 31.2 6T T 292 2.0 0.342 9.6 LOS A 2.8 70.1 0.55 0.64 33.6 6R R 2 2.0 0.370 10.5 LOS B 2.8 70.1 0.55 0.69 33.5 Approach 299 2.0 0.342 9.7 LOS B 2.8 70.1 0.55 0.65 33.6 := North: - :Shiraz =::R oad .. - - = 7L L 2 2.0 0.123 17.3 LOS B 0.8 20.9 0.62 0.83 30.0 4T T 3 2.0 0.123 11.1 LOS B 0.8 20.9 0.62 0.69 32.9 4R R 77 2.0 0.122 12.2 LOS B 0.8 20.9 0.62 0.73 32.5 Approach 82 2.0 0.122 12.3 LOS B 0.8 20.9 0.62 0.73 32.5 ..- ......:.. - West: Po mars - N eck� Road E B 5L L 54 2.0 0.330 13.7 LOS B 3.0 75.2 0.09 0.85 31.9 2T T 277 2.0 0.329 7.5 LOS A 3.0 75.2 0.09 0.49 36.0 2R R 151 2.0 0.329 8.5 LOS A 3.0 75.2 0.09 0.58 35.2 Approach 482 2.0 0.329 8.5 LOS B 3.0 75.2 0.09 0.56 35.2 .:...:.:.:.:. AllVehicles =_ ___= :_ -____ _==== 1:D32 >_ _ _ - _ __` 2D- ::_... =:D370 ='= .`:' . ='1D4`':,: L = _ __ =_ = __ -3`D ____``__ : 75:2 - 0:34:_ D. 33.6. Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM). Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:02 PM Copyright @2000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: 5:12011 Projects \11153 Futch Creek - Wilmington, NC \TIA\Analysis \Roundabout Analysis \275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SlP 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING DRS INTERSECTION. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -149 MOVEMENT SUMMARY ...... .. ... Intersection of Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road Background (2015) Traffic Conditions - AM Peak Roundabout Site: Background (2015) AM Peak ....... . .. . . .. . ... .. . .......... . . .......... ................ -- - ----- - , South:: =Ed evvaterIub- Road .. ::.. :.::.:.:. ..:.... .:..... - -- --- _ _ =_ = -_ ___ -_ _ _ - - __ _- _ ____ = - 3L L 299 2.0 0.379 16.0 LOS B 2.9 72.9 0.55 0.77 30.5 8T T 16 2.0 0.379 9.8 LOS A 2.9 72.9 0.55 0.64 32.9 8R R 16 - ----------------- 2.0 0.379 10.8 LOS B 2.9 ...... ------- 72. 0.55 0.88 32 Approach 330 2.0 0.379 15.5 LOS B 2.9 72.9 0.55 0.76 30.7 .-Ti- . . . .... . __ } - _ _ .. ........... 1L L 6 2.0 0.397 17.2 LOS B 3.1 79.3 0.68 0.88 30.5 6T T 279 2.0 0.386 11.0 LOS B 3.1 79.3 0.68 0.75 33.0 6R R 3 2.0 0.370 11.9 LOS B 3.1 79.3 0.68 0.78 33.1 Approach 288 2.0 0.385 11.1 LOS B 3.1 79.3 0.68 0.75 33.0 North .Shiraz -Roa:d _ ........... 7L L 10 2.0 0.244 19.2 LOS B 1.8 44.5 0.73 0.91 29.0 4T T 3 2.0 0.238 12.9 LOS B 1.8 44.5 0.73 0.80 31.5 - 4R R 131 2.0 0.244 14.0 LOS B 1.8 44.5 0.73 0.83 31.2 Approach 144 2.0 0.244 14.3 LOS B 1.8 44.5 0.73 0.84 31.1 West: Porters:Neck =- Road_ =. 5L L 28 2.0 0.272 13.7 LOS B 2.4 60.2 0.14 0.83 31.9 2T T 211 2.0 0.272 7.5 LOS A 2.4 60.2 0.14 0.49 35.7 2R R 133 2.0 0 .273 8.5 LOS A 2.4 60.2 0.14 0.57 35.0 Approach 372 2.0 0.272 8.4 LOS B 2.4 60.2 0.14 0.55 35.1 .. - -- _ -; _- _::::::- :11 4.. All Vehicles 3. 2 _ :;_:: - __ _ __ _ ;___:,:_ _..._.:_....... __ _ __0:397 = = =; - _: -_:___ .. ... :_;:: -1 -1.9 .- :LOS:B= ';. _;:;: ; _ 3 1 79:3`: : _ ___' _ x.47 = 0:70 _ 32.5 Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM). Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:00 PM Copyright 02000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: S:\2011 Projects \11153 Futch Creek - Wilmington, NC \TIA\Analysis \Roundabout Analysis\275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SIP 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -150 SJORA .NT R E TI N MOVEMENT SUMMARY site Background (2015) PM Peak . . . ........ Intersection of Porters Neck Road &Edgewater Club Road Background (2015) Traffic Conditions - PM Peak Roundabout 3L L 234 F 2.9 9.338 17.2 LOS B 2.4 61.7 9.63 9.83 29.8 a i 8T T 10 2.9 9.333 11.0 LOS B 2.4 61.7 9.63 0.72 32.4 8 R R 10 - ------------------- 2.9 9.333 12.0 LOS B 2.4 61.7 9.63 0.75 ........... . 32 Approach 254 2.0 9.338 16.7 LOS B 2.4 61.7 9.63 0.82 29.9 East = ::_:Porters= Neck -' Road -' 1111B : - ...... 1 L L 12 2.0 9.470 17.1 LOS B 4.1 103.5 9.79 0.87 30.5 6T T 338 2.0 9.467 10.9 LOS B 4.1 103.5 9.79 0.74 32.9 R 6R R 14 2.9 9.466 11.9 LOS B 4.1 103.5 0.79 0.78 33.9 r Approach 364 2.0 9.467 11.2 LOS B 4.1 103.5 0.79 0.75 32.8 _ ;No- rth-= Shiraz = _Road= S:B - _- _ - --- - =_ _ _ _ _ ___ . . _ = - ____ _ .. _ _ 7L L 9 2.9 9.171 18.9 LOS B 1.2 39.5 9.71 0.88 29.1 4T T 3 2.9 9.167 12.7 LOS B 1.2 39.5 9.71 0.77 31.7 4R R 87 2.9 9.179 13.7 LOS B 1.2 30.5 0.71 0.81 31.4 Approach 99 2.9 9.179 14.1 LOS B 1.2 39.5 0.71 0.81 31.2 ............ .. - Wes t::Porfers.'Neck Road= EB _= �. - -__; :__ - _ __ ........ _ ... ::; = _____= - . . . .. . . . - 5L L 61 2.9 9.479 13.8 LOS B 5.0 127.8 0.29 0.79 31.8 2T T 317 2.9 9.479 7.6 LOS A 5.9 127.8 0.29 0.48 35.4 2R R 274 2.9 9.479 8.6 LOS A 5.0 127.8 0.29 0.56 34.8 Approach 652 2.9 9.479 8.6 LOS B 5.0 127.8 0.29 9.54 34.7 r _ - iAl! Vehicles , 13 ?9 = 2:9 0.4 ?9 1 2 : LQS B: - 5:;G 12? 8 x.45 0.67 - 32.9 Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM). Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:01 PM Copyright 02000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0:19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: S:\2011 Projects \11153 Futch Creek - Wilmington, NC \TIA\Analysis \Roundabout Analysis \275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Ro 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING S ID RA I NTERSECTION Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -151 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Intersection of Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions - AM Peak Roundabout Site: Combined (275 units) AM Peak . ..... .... .. .. .... . . .......... . .. . ..... .... ......... .... ....... . ....... . .... . . .... .... .............. .. ............... . ...... . . . ................. ............ .... . ........ . . .. . ... . . ..... ..... ..................... . .. . .. . .. .. . .. Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay ): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM ). Level of Service (Worst Movement ): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM ). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:38 PM Copyright @2000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: 5:12011 Projects\11153 Futch Creek - WImington, NC\TIAIAnalysis\Roundabout Analysis\275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SIP 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING 1: 0 : INTERSECTION. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -152 3L L 299 2.0 0.388 16.2 LOS B 3.0 75.5 0.57 0.78 30.3 8T T 16 2.0 0.389 10.0 LOS B 3.0 75.5 0.57 0.65 32.7 8R R 16 2.0 0.389 11.0 LOS B 3.0 75.5 0.57 0.69 .. ..... 32.7 Approach 330 2.0 0.388 15.7 LOS B 3.0 75.5 0.57 0.77 30.5 - -_ :: E : P ers =: Neck _Road B ........... .... _ , : _ _- - _- _ : ... .. ........ . .. _ - 1L L 6 2.0 0.397 17.2 LOS B 3.3 82.9 0.69 0.88 3o.4 6T T 279 2.0 0.398 11.0 LOS B 3.3 82.9 0.69 0.75 33.0 6R R 12 2.0 0. 394 12.0 LOS B 3.3 82.9 0.69 0.78 33.0 Approach 297 2.0 0.398 11.2 LOS B 3.3 82.9 0.69 0.76 32.9 . ....... -- ....... - _.:_. -:: -_ ........::.. ... . =No=rth` = _:Shiraz_ Road _ - _- - - - -_ -_ - - - _ _ _ =_ -___ - - -_ . - _ _ -_- _ ......._....-_-........... .- ....- ____ ___ ........................ 7L L 27 2.0 0.272 19.3 LOS B 2.0 50.4 0.74 0.91 28.9 4T T 3 2.0 0.278 13.0 LOS B 2.0 50.4 0.74 0.81 31.4 4R R 131 2.0 0.273 14.1 LOS B 2.0 50.4 0.74 0.84 31.1 Approach 161 2.0 0.273 14.9 LOS B 2.0 50.4 0.74 0.85 30.7 .::...:..:.. ........ . ...... . ................ . . .. ........... : . ...:....... West: Porters: Ne`ck_Raad E B - 5L L 28 2.0 0.292 13.9 LOS B 2.6 66.6 0.21 0.80 31.8 2T T 211 2.0 0.292 7.7 LOS A 2.6 66.6 0.21 0.49 35.3 2R R 133 2.0 0.292 8.7 LOS A 2.6 66 0.21 0.57 34.7 Approach 372 i 2.0 0.293 8.5 LOS B 2.6 66.6 0.21 0.54 34.8 z z All_ Veh �cles 60 _ = .. .. 2 0 :: ... .. ... .. ..... ... 0:398 - : ,: 2: �= LAS B= 3_3 8.9 0.5 �.: x.70 3.4 Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay ): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM ). Level of Service (Worst Movement ): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM ). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:38 PM Copyright @2000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: 5:12011 Projects\11153 Futch Creek - WImington, NC\TIAIAnalysis\Roundabout Analysis\275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SIP 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING 1: 0 : INTERSECTION. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -152 MOVEMENT SUMMARY . ...... . ... . . . . .. . .. . .... .................. ...... ........ ....... ..... ... ................... .. .... . . . ..... . ....... . ...... . ..... ...... . . .... . ..... ........ . . . . . .... .............. .......... ... .. Intersection of Porters Neck Road & Edgewater Club Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions -- PM Peak Roundabout Site; Combined (275 units) PM Peak - ._ -_ ut e�nrater= u = fla ........ . . . ..... o_ 9 - . _ _ - .... .... .. . . . . - -- _ _ _ __ _ = _ - _ ................................ - - - - - _ _ - __ . _ - _ _ _ _ - - - __ _ -_ =_ _ _ _ _ _ . -- ... . ... _ - 3L L 234 2.0 0.342 17.3 LOS B 2.5 53.1 0.54 0.83 29.7 8T T 10 2.0 5.345 11.1 LOS B 2.5 53.1 5.54 9.73 32.3 8R R 10 -------- ----------------- ------------- -- 2.0 5.345 12.1 LOS B 2.5 53.1 5.54 9.75 32 Approach 254 2.0 5.342 15.8 LOS B 2.5 53.1 9.54 9.82 29.9 _ S. Porters:Neck=- R'o -ad- VVB - - - =- _ _ ............ _ - _ _ _ ...............:....... _ -- - . .. . ..... �i%'.% - _ _ 1 L L 12 2.0 5.489 17.3 LOS B 4.4 112.2 5.71 5.88 35.4 x 5T T 338 2.0 5.489 11.1 LOS B 4.4 112.2 5.71 9.75 32.8 5 R R 32 2.0 0.488 12 .1 LOS B 4.4 . .. . ............ 112.2 5. 71 9.78 32.9 Approach 382 2.0 0.489 11.4 LOS B 4.4 112.2 0.71 0.75 32.7 Graz_: o ort a :- __:: ; = 7L L 19 2.0 0.187 19.0 LOS B 1.3 33.9 0.72 0.88 29.0 4T T 3 2.0 0.185 12.7 LOS B 1.3 33.9 0.72 0.78 31.5 4R R 87 2.0 0.188 13.8 LOS B 1.3 33.9 0.72 0.81 31.3 Approach 109 2.0 0.188 14.5 LOS B 1.3 33.9 0.72 0.82 30.9 West`:Porters= ::Neck Road: - 5L L 51 2.0 0.489 14.0 LOS B 5.4 138.0 0.25 0.77 31.7 2T T 317 2.0 0.488 7.8 LOS A 5.4 138.0 0.25 0.48 35.0 2R R 274 2.0 0.487 8.7 LOS A 5.4 138.0 0.25 0.55 34.5 Approach 552 2.0 0.488 8.7 LOS B 5.4 138.0 0.25 0.54 34.5 AI1- Ueh�cles- 1398 _ 2.0 0::48.9. :11.4 LOS B _ 5.4- _ .... . ..... . - - 1-3.8.0_ . - .. .. .. 0.49: �. 7 3 . Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM). Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (HCM). Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement. Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. Processed: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:28:02 PM Copyright @2000 -2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: S:\2011 Projects\11153 Futch Creek - Wilmington, NC\TIA\Analysis\Roundabout Analysis\275 Units \Intersection #4 - Porters neck Road & Edgewater Club Road.SIP 8000474, RAMEY KEMP AND ASSOCIATES, FLOATING Ana INTERSECTION Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -153 APPENDIX G CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS FLITCH CREEK ROAD SITE DRIVEWAY #1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -154 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 8: Site Driveway #1 & Futch Creek Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 129 270 228 174 t Volume (veh /h) 16 100 211 32 205 157 Sign Control Stop 0 Free 615 Free Grade 0% Volume to Capacity 0% 0.16 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 111 234 36 228 174 Pedestrians A Approach Delay (s) 12.4 Lane Width (ft) 4.7 Approach LOS B Walking Speed (ft/s) Intersection Summar Percent Blockage Average Delay 4.4 Right turn flare (veh) 41.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Median type 15 None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1023 pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflicting volume 882 252 270 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 882 252 270 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 93 86 82 cM capacity (veh /h) 261 - 786 1293 Direction, Lane # W131 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 129 270 228 174 Volume Left 18 0 228 0 Volume Right 111 36 0 0 cSH 615 1700 1293 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.21 0.16 0.18 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 0 16 0 Control Delay (s) 12.4 0.0 8.4 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 12.4 0.0 4.7 Approach LOS B Intersection Summar Average Delay 4.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -155 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 8: Site Driveway #1 & Futch Creek Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 260 219 120 227 Volume Left Volume (veh /h) 31 203 180 17 108 204 Sign Control Stop 0 Free 719 Free Grade 0% Volume to Capacity 0% 0.13 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 34 226 200 19 120 227 Pedestrians A Approach Delay (s) 12.8 Lane Width (ft) 2.7 Approach LOS B Walking Speed (ft/s) Intersection Summary Percent Blockage Average Delay 5.2 Right turn flare (veh) 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Median type 15 None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1017 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 676 209 219 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 676 209 219 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) t (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 91 73 91 cM capacity (veh /h) 382 831 1351 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 260 219 120 227 Volume Left 34 0 120 0 Volume Right 226 19 0 0 cSH 719 1700 1351 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.36 0.13 0.09 0.13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 0 7 0 Control Delay (s) 12.8 0.0 7.9 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 12.8 0.0 2.7 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -156 APPENDIX H CAPACITY ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS FLITCH CREEK ROAD SITE DRIVEWAY #2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -157 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 25: Site Driveway #2 & Futch Creek Road Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions t /00 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 43 252 69 I t Volume (vehlh) 8 31 212 15 62 111 Sign Control Stop 0 Free 709 Free Grade 0% Volume to Capacity 0% 0.15 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.99 9.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 34 236 17 69 123 Pedestrians A Approach Delay (s) 10.4 Lane Width (ft) 2.8 Approach LOS B Walking Speed fts) Intersection Summa Percent Blockage Average Delay 2.0 Right turn flare (veh) 28.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Median type 15 None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflicting volume 505 244 252 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 505 244 252 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 98 96 95 cM capacity (vehlh) 499 795 1313 Direction, Lane # WIJB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 43 252 69 123 Volume Left 9 0 69 0 Volume Right 34 17 0 0 cSH 709 1790 1313 1799 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.15 9.05 9.97 Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 4 0 Control Delay (s) 10.4 0.0 7.9 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 10.4 0.0 2.8 Approach LOS B Intersection Summa Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions AM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -158 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Futch Creek (Wilmington, NC) 25: Site Driveway #2 & Futch Creek Road Combined (2015) Tra Conditio t Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y 160 37 224 t Volume (vehlh) 10 02 135 9 33 202 Sign Control Stop 0 Free 790 Free Grade 0% Volume to Capacity 0% 0.09 0% Peak Hour Factor 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 09 150 10 37 224 Pedestrians A Approach Delay (s) 10.1 Lane Width (ft) 1.1 Approach LOS B Walking Speed (ftls) Intersection Summary Percent Blockage Average Delay 2.3 Right turn flare (veh) 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Median type 15 None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflicting volume 453 155 100 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 453 155 100 tc, single (s) 0.4 0.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) - tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 92 97 cM capacity (vehlh) 550 891 1419 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 87 160 37 224 Volume Left 18 0 37 0 Volume Right 69 10 0 0 cSH 790 1700 1419 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.09 0.03 0.13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 2 0 Control Delay (s) 10.1 0.0 7.6 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 10.1 0.0 1.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synch ro 7 Report Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. Combined (2015) Traffic Conditions PM Peak Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -159 APPENDIX I TIA SLOPING LETTER Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -160 W ILMINGTON URBAN AREA Metropolitan Planning Organization P.O. Box 181 -0 wilm.1ingt- . , North Carolin 284.02 9 `0 341 32.58: :910 34. 78x1 FAX Memb ers: f City :of City:oINGT Lead Planning Agency Town f CAROLINA BEACH Town of KURE'BEACH Town of WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH 1 November 2011 M olly. ;C. Mathewson, RE R Kemp & Associa 5.808 Fari Pia ce, Suite oo Raleigh., NC. 27609 RE: Futch .Creek Ne v Han nty, N C Ms. Mathew NEW. HANOVE R County Based on the information provided by yo.u,. it is our understanding that the prapo5ed - Town .of d will consist of 70 townh.o-mes, 180 multi- family units. and u.p to 200,000 BELVI s;f 0f general office space, The proposed ..a cee,ss to the s -ite consists of two full- Town of movement dr iUeways onto SR 1 400 (Futch creek Road). For purpose, of this study, LELAND a build out yea of 2015 i 5 assumed,elaw please find the sc ope. far a'naly5is to be com for the Futch Cree k.2011 Traff I Analysis: Town of NAVASSA 1. Data C01 I ecti.0 M - Ana lysis.: Para r-ete rs: BRUNSWICK a. Exist Candit_ions bounty _ i. Turning movement counts - weekday AM (7:0OP M -- 9;00 AM) and PM PENDER (4 00 PIV - 6:0 P [� peak periods, Signal T cif applicable} and County Lane. Geometry. ■ US 17 at Market Street to Fut Creek Road j Stephens Church CAPE FEAR. Road {signalised} Public Transportation ■ US 17' at U-Turn Med Break (,Si Authori ■ Market Street at,Futch Creek Road dun 1gnalize North Carolina Market .Street at Proposed Site �-riueway tl BOARD of Market Street'a -t Proposed Site Briveway .2. T Porter s Neck Road at Edgewater Cluh Roa Sharaz way ( n d a b o utl ii, Signal plans. may be acqu - fired by sending an email request to NCD Division 3 Office; Joe C hance., j hance@ncdot.gov or by calling:(910) :2 51 -524. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -161 .b: Site Tri Generation Site Trip Distribution and l3ack ground Traffic. Assu i, Site:Trip :generation S,ee, E�c#�i attac i.i. Si.te Trip D:istr ■ See Exhibit B attached Adjacent:Develapm.ent. ■ Scott Hi Vi .lage -is a. mixed - use development - Located north - :of the p r o p :osed`deyelop.ment o US .17.. R.h. se 1 ( clinic) is com plete. The remaining development: includes residential, office, retail, and medical la nd. uses. This study assumes, the developmont will be 50 ilt bu o by the buil out year. porters Crossing. s. a residential devel.opment.assumed to consist of 49 single family homes and is located to the west of Edgewater Club Road on porters Neck Road. This study assumes the .development wi1.1 be 100% built out -by the build. out year. ■ The Porters Pointe residential development is assumed to co nsist of -61-sing-1.0 family homes and is located to the west. of Edgewater Club Road a n Porters Neck Road. This study assumes the development will be 1`44: built out by the build. - out year. The Waterstone at Porters Nec.k residential . development is assumed to consist of'186 single family. homes and is located to th.e south of pave Neck load on Edgewater Club Road. This study assumes the development will be. ln.0 %: built out by the. bui o ut yea r. ■ The Regist -r at Vineyard Plantation is - a.ssumed to consist of. 1.06 sifngle family homes - and is located aio.ng SR.14o0 Futch .Creek- Road. This stgdy assu.m.es the deveIo will. be .100° built out by the b year. W. Background.Traffic Ass ■ Horizon year — 2415 ■ Growth. rate —.3% pqr year 2.0 Fina port, Sub.mittal: gned and sea -led by a professio Engineer b..Four co 'pies.and one P c. Synchro analysis files i digital form 3. Capacity Analysis: AM & Ni peak Hour (for locations list i n L a.i) a.. Existing ( Tra ffic b. Background: ( OAS ) Traffic [includes, existing +a growth c, -Co mb ned 215} Traffic [includ.es background traffic + Site Trips] Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -162 4. Final Report- Submittal: a. Signed and :sealed .by a professional Engi neer b.- Fo ur- co.pies on PDF C:.= Synchro analys'ls files .in digital format Please: conta m e - '1f you have any questions regarding th is s cope. Regards, I ( Tara S. Murphy, RLA /LEEQ -A� .... Associate Transportation Planner Wilmington MPO Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -163 Anthony L aw, Dist Engi neer", .NCDOT Jan Daughtridge, NHCo Katie Hite,- Division T ra ffic Eng NCDOT .l essi Boo ker, N DOT a Mike Ko: zIo sky, Executive Director, WiImirngton Mp0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -163 Exhibit A -- Site Tr'ip' Generation Provided by Ramey K emp & Associate Trips. generated by the proposed deve- lopnieut were estimated utiiizill inethodolpgY 1 coutavled %vith . ie Institute. of Trans portation E��guleers (ITE) Trip G ener ation nianua1, S Edition. Tula generation equatiolis were used to .ggierate trips for each use. Refers to Table It f6r the Ri11 builci:0ut Trip Geueratiolr.. TABLE 1 Tdop Generation Cowl Use �T ode size .. .14-Hour urries A�I� P��: :� a u -r T ,i . . �, P air �I Pea Tr" �s Eater Edit E� tei` Exit GeneraY ofFice '710 200:000 lsf 2 -5 287 39 51. 25 1 Resideiltxa TeN vlillonie 220. 70 Unit 472 7 32. �0 15 Apar- hil.ei 230 1 U.illts 11214 19 74 76 4 1 Total T-O 3 .312 145 157 307 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -164 Exhibit 8 -- bite Tri distribution. (Attached is the' original distributions provided. by R Kemp & Associates. As these do- not include-the Registry at Vineyard Planta iun, this is for irforrnation urposes and v ill need to be revised by Ramey K e mp as part of the study. R.arr�ey K rn ' s hafl'submit a.revised site trip distribution exhibit for review prior the acceptance of formal. TIA submittal,. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -165 US 17 .t :v a� +n S - il na l I1itersectiall a Unsignalized Intersection Scale: Kot to scale CC ii r XX% Distrl butt n . Percentages .- chueclI Road 0 +r, larkct'. St reet �a to Futrt� creek Road J US '17 4. 1P1: o � r� LEGEND :v a� +n S - il na l I1itersectiall a Unsignalized Intersection Scale: Kot to scale trevt XX% Distrl butt n . Percentages .- 0 +r, US '17 4. 1P1: o � r� LEGEND ASSOCIATES S - il na l I1itersectiall NE.W HAN ILL'R, NORTH CAROLINA. Unsignalized Intersection Scale: Kot to scale Roundabout Intersection XX% Distrl butt n . Percentages .- %) Entering . (Ex t ng) Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -166 Plantatlon Landing Drive Futch Creek Road trket (SR 1.440) -- Q� r- -r - r r- �w r� -rte r- ►w r- -w r. r r. r r w w �r �r �w Porters Neck Road (SR.i4U2) Edgewater Club:Road (SR 1 02) 15% Market Street to. Futch Creek Road Porters Meek Road (,-S R 1491) R A M E - Y K E M R ASSOCIATES FU TCH CREEK DE VELOPMENT NE.W HAN ILL'R, NORTH CAROLINA. Pnrmary Trii). Distribution. Scale: Kot to scale Figurc % 8 Exhibit C — Location Map &Proposed Conceptual Sketch (Provided "by Ramey Kemp &Associates, TIA site development area outlined blue by WMPO) Vi `l 3 ITO r ; 1 i Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -9 -167 [ma 15111"M ( M. ANEWASKIM—, 1051m � ` : I-)o `6 11, 111 I-Ist I,-c v i e ��x, ed, I P I t A , )(I cl, 11C 0 111'.6 I e S d C CLI" I z i n I I et e 1, I, 0I" CO311) I I c, c Lt C 0 1, 1 S L 1, j e e o S 4 () 0. 0 0 1 c c 1"', 1� I ]r 4 Jc (J (I k� 111,11011, slom, illvt-, 16,1, 1"iv-C (-)I- les"s, A h t 111"A'I"i I'l X:e �,,Ic 1'es tel, tlee I'S600.00, �v I H I)e c li, nl) ect. I ti 'I s -( p",-1 "Ll, 1� I e to N ev, F-I tfA 1;11,ox-e 1'. ("0 Ll 11 IA,'. M t ST i;cct) ii y 11, 1 s l'o,\ N I I I S li H1110['111 I'll' 10il e I 1 11, t c) 11. t [1 1 , 1 e [, 1, 11 e I -,I I t-, I i [!,., d: I I ii e N c 1, [,,i� 11,(.:5 c I- CO L 1111 0 tlfr- d 0 1" 0,1 1�)r I I I I S, I Ij I C I- S �-,l I 'I �, ('Jist"'l-Ict, Il I -lc(,') ]'mI\ 1-CC 1, IV FC V I c �N It)'\, �L 1-1 e, 11'ecil l'i ic Li I R,c v i c Co i�ti ut,i,! I 1,ce (TR,(-") p I' I I Dc v c I o 11r] c L -,L,1, 11d 1Ac tiomtl L)cS1,L,1! S11 � Ip p 1, 1 c (7) 11 -S,[ 11) 1111 s S I (-)] 1. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-1 A I ON 4, Pefitioner Information Propct*lt) Ovvner(s) S',,ub Propet ? f (4 mn t th a n, P eti 4 er Ni an i e uler N it iu e "Adch-ess S 7, 0 4 N"I -a r k c, I S fi-c c t — ------------- — ----------------- --------- IT" :A r c c I 11) Rid Health Investors 3 0116. 9-4.0 7 J. 0 0,0 S 3 7.1 Cit'VIj Stirite, Zip ... . . ...... . - — ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cilv. St'ite. zip ------ Existirlo zonin� an-d Vse 1," 1 lo I -,I! ce 1 1 1,,IF o 11 c P I- o p ws, c d 10 R 111 �I: 1) d S e t RJ F . .............................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................ il 1 a n IV R 1,1ei"i I I S es t I [ma 15111"M ( M. ANEWASKIM—, 1051m � ` : I-)o `6 11, 111 I-Ist I,-c v i e ��x, ed, I P I t A , )(I cl, 11C 0 111'.6 I e S d C CLI" I z i n I I et e 1, I, 0I" CO311) I I c, c Lt C 0 1, 1 S L 1, j e e o S 4 () 0. 0 0 1 c c 1"', 1� I ]r 4 Jc (J (I k� 111,11011, slom, illvt-, 16,1, 1"iv-C (-)I- les"s, A h t 111"A'I"i I'l X:e �,,Ic 1'es tel, tlee I'S600.00, �v I H I)e c li, nl) ect. I ti 'I s -( p",-1 "Ll, 1� I e to N ev, F-I tfA 1;11,ox-e 1'. ("0 Ll 11 IA,'. M t ST i;cct) ii y 11, 1 s l'o,\ N I I I S li H1110['111 I'll' 10il e I 1 11, t c) 11. t [1 1 , 1 e [, 1, 11 e I -,I I t-, I i [!,., d: I I ii e N c 1, [,,i� 11,(.:5 c I- CO L 1111 0 tlfr- d 0 1" 0,1 1�)r I I I I S, I Ij I C I- S �-,l I 'I �, ('Jist"'l-Ict, Il I -lc(,') ]'mI\ 1-CC 1, IV FC V I c �N It)'\, �L 1-1 e, 11'ecil l'i ic Li I R,c v i c Co i�ti ut,i,! I 1,ce (TR,(-") p I' I I Dc v c I o 11r] c L -,L,1, 11d 1Ac tiomtl L)cS1,L,1! S11 � Ip p 1, 1 c (7) 11 -S,[ 11) 1111 s S I (-)] 1. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-1 The owner/applicant and or authorized a should plan to attend all meetin at which this re will be heard. ■ FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING 'Your intended use of propert upon rezonin is completel irrelevant, except for conditional use district proposals. The North Carolina General Statutes re that zonin re shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive an The g overmin g board is re to adopt statements that the chan is or Is not consistent, reasonable, and Iin. the public's Iinterest. Since amendments to zonin maps should also be based on. a Land Use Plan, y ou must explain1how Y our re satisfies each of the followin re q uirements: ( Fill in below or attach additional pa 1. How would the re change be consistent with the Count Policies for Growth and Development 90 In the CAMA 2006 Land use Plan there is a stron emphasis on conservation of wetlands and water bodies, conservin open space, encoura a sense of communit reducin automobile tri s, and encoura more low impact transpor- IP tation. The count EDZD ordinance is the most consistent zonin re to meet these g oals. Futch Creek Villa 0 * tended to be a sustamiable development which will meet man of the Count conservation g oals and be an excep- is in I tionall des* ned development over that of a t residential R-15 or B-2 development . 19 Man of the services for these apartments are alread established within one mile of this 1infRil nei hborhood. There are 19 (4) places of worshi , a hardware store, fencin retail, concrete contractor, and a classic car dealer within 1/2 mile. IP Withm* one mile there are two g rocer y stores, two banks, multiple restaurants, a g as station, a bi box hardware store, 19 and multiple retail opportunities. The nei is on an existin street that alread has a stop li onto hi 17. Hi 17 Iis less than 1/2 mile from the two entrances to the communit UNE10= Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-2 Z. How would the requested zone change be consistent with the property's classification on the Land Classification Map? The change to a more sustainable zoning requirement will secure more low impact storm water management practices, including reducing imperious services, use of rain barrels, and protection of existing water bodies and wetlands than traditional R -15 and B -2 zoning will be able to require currently. I What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning ina ro riate or how is the land ' I nvolved g pp p unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? There are two major shifts that have occurred. One is the inclusion of the EDZD. This zoning district opens up the possibilities of promot- ing sustainable design in alignment with the LAMA Planning. The second shift is the recession and its impact on single family. The part of the 37.2 acres zoned R -15 has two major draw backs. Adding additional single family residences will only continue to flood the market and drive down the property values of the surrounding properties. Also, with the new requirements for borrowing money for homes, has driven up the need for young professionals to become long term rental tenants. Meeting this need near the location of available jobs, like medical, will help to reduce traffic within the county. 4. How will this change of zoning serve the public interest? This zoning change will serve the public in several ways. This area is a residential and small business area. Under the current zoning of B 1 and B2 in the front of the property cold leed to highway retail, hotel, and fast food development which will impact the wait times and exas- perate any percieved traffic problems with the light at Futch Creek and Highway 17. An upscale office park is intended for the front portion of the site. This will limit the type of business development up front. The multifamily residential development in the rear of the property will have Low Impact Development storm water systems, a low imper- vious ratio and will be amenitized for recreational activities. These actions will reduce infrastructure needs compared to an equal amount of multifamily. It will provide quality rental products that are in high demand in our new economy. Additional single family will exasperate a flooded market that is reducing home values. In signing this petition, I understand that the existing zoning map Is presumed to be correct and that I have the burden of proving why a change Is in the public Interest. I further understand the singling out of one parcel of land for special zoning treatment unrelated to County policies and the surrounding neighborhood would probably be Illegal, I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Signature of Petitioner and /or Property Owner Print Name Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -3 New Hanover Count New Hanover Count 0 ON I IWO,, W-, R Pa I of I Home Propert Records Owner Address Parcel ID Advanced Profile Sales Residential Commercial Misc. Improvements Permits Land Values A Sketch Full Le Exemptions Sub-parcel(s) Info Ori Parcel Info Parcel Map Aerials R.;n �� Ez le -U �""" # La A Ed U 0" L�j NHC Tax Home > Re of Deeds Home 8704 MARKET ST CURRIENTRECORD 1 of 1 FReturn to Search Re Last GIS Data Update: 4-Jan-2010 Data Cop New Hanover Count [Disclaimer] [Privac Polic Last Updated: 28 Nov 2011 -10 Site Desi Cop 1999-2006 Akanda Group LLC. All ri reserved. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-4 http: / /etax.nhc Forms /MapDatalet.aspx ?slndex= 0 &idx = &LMparent=20 12/5/2011 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FUTCH CREEK VILLAGE 37.2 ACRES Commence at the centerline intersection of Old Market Street and Futch Creek Road (SR 1491); thence N 58' 11 ' 45" E 80.20' to a point; thence N 35' 44' 20" E 180.98' along the east right -of -way of Old Market Street to an existing iron pipe, thence N 42 36' 05" E 64.68' to an existing iron pipe and point of beginning. From Point of beginning thence N 42 36' 05" E 612.54' to an existing iron pipe; thence S 47 23' 55" E 19.69', thence N 42 36' 05" E 380.85'; thence S 49 48' 44" E 510.74'; thence N 40 11' 16" E 171.85'; thence S 49 48' 44" E 479.47'; thence 36 03' 33" W 172.30'; thence S 49 48' 44" E 201.05'; thence N 40 21' 20" E 343.73'; thence S 49 48' 57" E 635.72' to the centerline of a branch, the property line; thence continuing along the centerline of a branch S 76 58' 17" W 110.61'; thence S 46 21' 59" W 4.09'; thence S 33 50' 24" W 31.92'; thence S 49 35' 36" W 26.23'; thence S 74 28' 16" W 46.60'; thence S 80 41' 37" W 11.74'; thence S 80 44' 23" W 24.12'; thence S 50 51' 36" W 14.87'; thence S16 35' 47" W 124.71'; thence S 38 55' 11" W 23.05'; thence S 29 13' 55" W 35.75'; thence S 29 40' 47" W 25.21'; thence S 19 59' 40" W 41.89'; thence S 13 49' 10" W 39.35'; thence S 16 55' 47" W 124.71'; thence S 16 55' 47" W 16.81'; thence S 20 12' 13" W 72.32'; thence S 20 12' 44" W 14.62'; thence S 41 35' 48" W 33.68'; thence S 78 07' 55" W 89.48'; thence S 75 24' 11" W 34.69'; thence 76 07' 55" W 89.48'; thence S 69 34' 40" W 34.57'; thence S 49 27' 10" W 19.83'; thence S 40 08' 35" W 85.74'; thence S 26 45' 57" W 11.74'; thence leaving said branch N 49 11' 10" W 718.04'; thence N 49 01' 06" E 484.05'; thence S 37° 58' 48" W 281.13' to an existing iron pipe; thence N 49 51' 30" W 611.53" to the point of beginning, containing 37.2 acres, more or less. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -5 Futch Creek Community Exceptional Design Project Narrative The Futch Creek Community project comprises approximately 37 acres of land located in northern New Hanover County. It is the intention of the owners to provide a quality design and a site development that w i l l be a model project for the county. For this purpose, the project intends to utilize the New Hanover County Exceptional Design Zoning District (EDZD). This zoning will allow for a greater flexibility of use, improved sustainable design practices, and improved neighborhood amenities. With the increasing urbanization of New Hanover County, intelligent design and the careful integration of developments is more critical than ever. The EDZD was conceived to "prevent the degradation of water quality and provide design flexibility to achieve public and private spaces that advance a sense of community in a well- integrated service area that diminishes the need for vehicular traffic." The proposed development will achieve the goals of the EDZD through thoughtful planning and design. The features of the project are outlined in the submitted attachments. Decreased impervious area By congregating buildings in clusters, less total impervious area is proposed than what could be placed under current zoning. Additionally, the perimeter of the site is preserved as buffer area. This is particularly evident at the rear of the site in the vicinity of the wetlands that feed into the Futch Creek Watershed. Improved stormwater controls Earlier proposals for this site anticipated traditional open stormwater detention areas, which would involve clearing large areas of the site and utilizing it for detention capacity. This type of system is difficult to maintain, and does not provide a tangible benefit for the community. The current proposal would place the stormwater treatment underground using Best Management Practices and current technology. The treatment would be through a series of "cells" stacked together and forming a structural detention facility. Above this, at grade, the design calls for more fill dirt and sod, forming a community playing field amenity. Additional treatment w i l l utilize other BMP's such as bioretention. Community amenities The EDZD encourages interconnectivity and the use of pedestrian and bicycle connections. We propose an 8' multi -use path that will circle the site, allowing residents and others to walk or ride bicycles with two way traffic. This path will be composed of pervious mulch where it meanders through the preserved wetland buffer areas. Along this path w i l l be pet waste stations, benches, and bird watching locations with educational information on local birds, plants and the wetlands. Additionally, the site will provide a path from end to end along the road frontage, which could provide connection for a future interconnected neighborhood system. At the road frontage, we propose a shelter which could serve as an entry element for the development, and also allow a respite for bikers and walkers. 5a- Narrative Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -6 2 Accessibility of uses The EDZD encourages the placement of projects near amenities and services. The intention is that residents could walk or bike to these areas without requiring a car. There are multiple such uses within a half mile of this site, and even more within 3 /4 mile. Immediately connected to the site is an existing Ace Hardware store. These stores have smartly limited their building footprint, while allowing customers to order thousands of additional items from their online service, which is delivered directly to the store for pick up. The items available from this store vary greatly like vacuums, trash bags, cleaning supplies, lamps, light bulbs, furniture, laundry detergent, pet food, or toasters. Limitation of uses Under current zoning, the front portion of the site (zoned 131 and 132) is eligible for many intense uses, such as fast food, pharmacies, hotel, and highway retail. The site conditions for this area were changed with highway 17 was reconfigured, but the zoning for the site remained from before. The current proposal would limit the use for the road frontage areas to office (preferably medical), which is more compatible with the community. Limitation of scale The proposed plan does not maximize the site density possible with the EZDZ zoning. In addition to l i m i t i n g the scale and type of development at the front commercial parcels, the rear of the site could contain over 350 apartment units, as opposed to the 274 currently proposed. Traffic During our neighborhood meetings, the major theme that was voiced was about traffic. Neighbors report that the current Futch Creek intersection with Highway 17 backs up during morning rush hour. They are concerned that the added cars from this development could create a larger problem. Since that meeting, we have consulted with our traffic engineer (Ramey Kemp) to determine ways to address this issue. Our proposal is to make major modifications to the Futch Creek /Highway 17 intersection as outlined in the traffic engineering supplemental report. These changes would include adding a second turn lane onto Highway 17, adding a new signal, and changing the signal timing to allow more cars to exit and enter Futch Creek Road. We believe that the proposed project is an excellent example of how EZDZ can provide quality design, control of sprawl, and encourage owners to construct responsibly and sustainably. It will be a model project for the county, and provide a template for others to follow. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss it with you at greater length. 5a- Narrative Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -7 EDZD- Overview for Futch Creek Village Rezoning Application April 2012 # Core Requirements Compliance Points Status 1 Smart Location Option 1 : Locate project on an infill site. Req'd Yes Option 2: Locate on a adjacent site with pre - project connectivity 2 Proximity to Water and Wastewater Locate on a site scheduled for water and serwer Req'd Yes expansion. 3 Significant Species and Ecological Consult with NC Natural Heritage Program Map Req'd Communities 4 Wetland and Water Body Pet waste station within required open spaces and Req'd Yes Conservation and Preservation maintenance schedule Option 2: land within 100' shall not experience Yes significant destruction or lasting detmental effects to water quality 5 Floodplain Avoidance Option 3: Develop only on portions not in floodplain Req'd Yes 6 Storm water management comprehensive storm water management plan that Req'd Yes infiltrates and reuses storm water runoff. Additional Requirements (12 points required) 1 Bicycle and pedestrian access Bicycle connections thru 90% of cul -de -sacs 2 Yes bicycle parking and storage for developments that obtain multifamily, retail and commercial 2 Housing and Jobs /Commercial Option 1 : at least 30% residential of total s.f. and locate 2 No Opportunity Proximity so that full time equivalent jobs are equal or greater to the # of dwelling units. Option 2: At least 30% of total s.f. is non Residential No ( +/- 86,500s.f. of commercial) 3 Diversity of Uses locate at least 50% of dwelling units within 1/2 mile 4 Yes walk to two of three listed on diversity of uses (Place of worship, Hardware store) 4 Conservation Management of Habitat Create a long -term management plan for new or existing 2 No or Wetlands onsite native habitats or water bodies and wetlands and their buffers and create a guaranteed funding source for management 5 Transit facility 4 No 6 Certified Green Building One residential or non residential building LEED, NAHB 2 Yes NC Healthy build Homes or Green Globes. 7 Minimum Energy Efficiency 90% of new buildings must meet energy star 4 Yes 8 Water Efficient Landscaping limiting turf to 25% or less, incorporating a rainwater 2 Yes catchment system, drip irrigation and utilizing storm water for landscape[e irrigation 9 Building Orientation 75% of building sites have longer dimension 0 -30 2 No degrees of south 10 Affordable Housing 15% of units are rented to households earning less than 2 No the AMI at affordable levels for 15 years 14 total Density Calculation: 6 units x 37.2 acres = 223.2 units 8 units x 37.2 acres = 297.6 units Up to 275 residential units are desired Es Board of Commi gs Meeting 5b 07/02/ 2 8 -10 -8 Z O to Un O A r-4 rl O O , j j" ! " w 51E Ilk )MUM r w l 0 .......... NEW" f _. - Lu Al r 1 0 Un O A r-4 rl O O 5d. Open Space Calculations Open Space(4 16110): Open space shall be provided within all exceptional design zoning districts and except as provided in section (c) below shall equal a minimum of 35% of the gross site area of the district. Open space is an area of land set aside, dedicated, or reserved for public or private use or enjoyment that shall be functionalfor uses including but not limited to: an area of environmental preservation and enhancement, park, internal courtyard, plaza, playground, playfield, atrium or greenway pedestrian and non - motorized vehicle easement. Open space may be natural or recreational. (a) Natural open spaces are intended to protect the natural environment, protect water quality, provide environmental New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance Page 62 education and provide habitat for wildlife. Natural open spaces include natural features such as wetlands and conservation overlay districts or otherwise undevelopable land. Natural open spaces shall not exceed 10% of the open space requirement. (b) Recreation open spaces maybe active or passive and are intended to provide outdoor recreation opportunities or provide locations where the public is directly or indirectly invited to gather, browse, sit, interact or congregate. A maximum of 25% of the open space area may contain amenitized recreational facilities including swimming pools, golf courses, tennis courts and basketball courts. Unimproved passive recreation open spaces are encouraged. (c) If the proposed open space is less than 35% or the types of open space do not conform to (a) and (b), the application shall include an explanation of how the project reasonably provides for spaces that enhance a sense of community and quality of life for the future residents or patrons of the EDZD. All open space shall remain undivided Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-10-10 SL St p ! ,l + ! ! s 1 j / �? f f < r Y, I�F51 { { \ N {s i .... I \ : z als ,[,tl 3dJll Dal jrJltf�tfstss�l \: s Y y !' t` �tit�» Vy �tF�l ',�}��ct�} \II�11 }iili ?}tts't,!£ i tSl t s i ',i l ,S� \Sl r ` _ti�s l {y�tl}IJ(il�lt a u # Y #i,s,��\ }� #,lt �Yllitt }tr \fl }i) #`4r1 +i,)!. II}7st t\'y 114 'Is }�,St {'1 #f \ p t' ,, , r, /�� ,, } J �«,} m., 4 { t r rt t � . ,,, I t \ I i t \ t s rs , l rt , t 11n }� is , t } it t � 1 , t L rJ +J — i,,;. M L � t�} } s t11 } {S 1 4— — :11 t !cfi { r \' s,, ' ,t: ! t , rt r „'`lY t sr t s •it' rr !r i,, :. rj w, "�at`'t., ,si \j 5\J)Ji Il S.1,� }} t {,Y U �� ",, }� i ( Y rr71, z) i , r t r ;, ,t, » y', ti.,=, c t.4i ? { }��Uyl \# r • — S S, ( , 1t,IIh= Ir ^ ^� i( r i r , It t r } tF i J ii rt t s t4 i t ti 1 t 7 r I 0 t 4 I I f } t l llc$§ ^l ia+ h �r�$ \ I (n �� tiff ��yX}', } C/7 ?t4 tl l� k l tii W 4—j (; i,kr4 I. t I L / I � ( r 4 r £ ? I � , t r t � r 1 r , ! t °r�;�lii' S 3' y I 1 \ \Y , , , r / z S ��I? 7 •— *� t ,,� c I ct L 1 ct I N ((�� tW y a g � W✓ " t��(f�\ ` t�f #7� G o 'q „anis'1'� ` ¢ » t ' d f » 'n+ I' I1p'ii r1� c (�� O � u,/ _ a P ■i�■!al!d ; lay {j > LLJ IN I'll I s V a r } ,3 ( + --' — art J f J mJl' # #��I�SI L.L „ VI I , I k N k s i � #t �! ,_,_, W M } It „t W t LLJ �� }x' �t U LLJ V n» 5 {v 1) 1j ' rh {15 f 1 F low `�� CL "'� }, J C/7 ` s w LL t • i LL d = —j Q LL n Q mom Y J -.!T w 1146 - r w U „{ d ~ _ J Q W / CO 0- Now OW __. 9 5f. Core Requirement One (CR1) -Smart Location, Option One Requirement Option 1: Locate project on an infill site Infill Site is defined as a site where at least 75% of the perimeter of the property borders parcels that have been previously developed. Previously Developed is defined as a site having pre- existing impervious coverage that would typically have required regulatory permitting to have been initiated. Implementation Over 75% of the property border parcels have been previously developed. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-10-13 5g. Core Requirement Two (CR2) Proximity to Water and Wastewater Option Two Requirement Option 2: Locate project within an area scheduled for water and sewer expansion where verifiable expansion plans can be provided and allocation of capacity can be confirmed with the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority. Implementation The project has been allocated 77,520 GPD for the Village by CFPUA. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-10-15 //0// u bj t� dutch Creek Vi llage I at ffue, 18 Oct 2011 14:58:00 -0400 Fro m: Brice Johnson Boni . Johnson , c To:'Lee Gallowa Oee-t awc.rr.com) <lee-triRR9nizQec.rr-00M?� Phil Tfipp (P. triDDQec-rr.com) < e.rr.cm CQChri stene Mitchell hri tc e. Mitchel1 fD ua.orp,>, James orwr Jcs.rse . ur Le e., lour pla n have beery a pP roved a rid allocation (77, 520 GPI hay 1�i l� ice n sit a �� r Fu th re Village. once the Country Have lift station imp rovement s have been com pleted (expected compleflon 12 / 201 1), we gill sign tyre perm its and m ake a ai1abl e to scut If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to c ontact e. T ha nks Bernice S. Joh nson, Project En i'ne r 235 Govern Center Drive Wilmington, NC 28403 Office: 9 10.332.6620 Mobile: 910-508.2165 Fax: 910.332.6353 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-10-16 SIX Id .............. Cape Fear 1 (11 1 'i I � I U % Decernber 21, 201 Hid Cl'a,lden Mealth Invest,ors', Attw., Ronnie McNeil 2334., South, 41 st Sh,,ee't Wilmin NC 28403 R E Futch Creek Villa r CFPUA File # 326016.004 (Private Water) ( You !"lus't Si and return p, rior to construction McNeill, 23,5 Government Ceriter Drive, Willniin NC 284,03 t,: 9,10-7,99-6064 f: 910 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-17 Ltnauthori'zed operation oif CFPUA, owned valves, h and other appurtenances,, is g rou.n& for 601 penalt assessment and Ibr other enforcement actions. The Authorit one ( 1 ) y ear war rant will start from the date the s conve is recorded. If the c ce is not executed b the Developer In a timel manner, all buildin permits and/or Certificate of Occupanc will be, held Until the conve information is properl submitted. You, must disclose this to all bu An taps, which ma be deemed necessar to, be insfalled, relocated, or, abandoned will be the responsibilit of th,e Developer or owner at no cost to the Authorit and will be performed in accordance with the Authorit specifications ii approval. The Authorit inspector will perform all necessar water, service inspections prior to obtainin an Certificate of Occupanc ( CO ) . This is not a, commitment of capacit It onl indicates present availabilit S m Capacit will chan as now connections a:re made, potentiall impactin" g i y our abilit to connect some or all of y our proposed development into the Authorit s kill Bernice S. Johnson Cape Fear Public Utilit Authorit En Department Development servicies DiVI$iOn Frank St RE., Director of, En Steve, McGowan, Utilit Construction Inspector PhOlip G. Tripp, RE., Tripp En P.C. 235. Governmetu Center Drive, Wiltnini NC 2,84013 9,10-799-60,64 f- 910-799ia�60'166 ify . . . ..... . .. . . ...... Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-18 R E Futch Creek Villa CFPUA File # 3260116,004 (Private Water) 1 . I waive the option of re Authorit cost participation in cost, of this S ( i ni t i a 1 2. 1 am re cost participation. See m attached re for participation three ( initial ) indepenclent bids for the, pro showin the showin the cost differences that I am re participation for. 11, acknowled that participation a take a minimuni-of 45 A Le to execute and are at the sole discretion of the Authorit 'L'I I W I a that no utilities construction will commence before a padId"pation a c=trtact (initial.) is in place, or I waive the participation ott er ( see above Si ( re q sir ed Date T71r- MIN.- 4 1 235 Govet'nmient Center Drive, W11man NC 284031 IF, t: 910�799-6064 f'; 9'10-799-606(5 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-19 North Carolina Department of Envil"onment ,And, Natural Resources Division of; Water Resources Public Water Suppl Section Applicant Desi En I: y A t _hk i L y Phillip G. Tripp, P . 11"z (Nwiw ol'"Bw,,ird, Counci I or Owner —the (Nsi Eii U Recor, , , x 14 r, ca 11 (1) attie ot'De MJ,tchell, Enc,,,'_"JLn,eerin Mana (Nartic aid T'ItIc. of Authoriz"ed Official Or Rep resel'ita tive of the Applica,nt) 235 Governmen,t (-'enter Drrli-'V('�"' (Street or Box'Nuviber) 419 Chestnut Street (Strect oj- Box'Nuiiibct), Wilmin 'N'C 284,03 Wilmi-ngton, NC 28401 (c ity, State & z IP') ( Cit y , State & ZIP 910-332-6560 (T' h o ii c N ti ui b c r) address) 7 ( Si g vid ( Natiic ofEri Firm 910-763-5100 910 "163-5 631 ('FAX Nualbe,r) it pp em . ( E,i,iiald address Project Name;- Fu-tch (,37eek, Vil.l.age of'Pro to appear, ori Public Water SZuppl Section records, wid: trackiti s 4, Q30 JJ' of HY' C-900 PVC wEiter main, 9 fi:r�e h fittirig's an,d othe,r appurtefiancef3 Wescrlptiori of'prL 8704 Market Street ( locafioj) of proJect) HM sm Obr'DENR, use o11 l) Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-20 am= (fcri- D'EN'R use otfly) Application for Approval of En Plans and SpecIfications fbr Water Suppl S TO Rivi'Mori of"Water ResOUrCe'S, De- of Envirojini,ent and Natural Resources An authorizedr present tive of thv Pubfic Wal I -'er S (not alwa the sa:1110 as the A pplicant) is to complete and Si the fbilowin WSMP sectIO111, Provide the fbIlowin Pub] 1e Water S Name: Feaar Pubic uti,lit Authorit Ownei,-Naniv: ',F(-.,,a,r Pub JL LY A- b o r IL Y ic Ut I t A t' t W,cite-S NC 04-65-01. m. 0 Serial Numberof approved'WSIMV: 9 9 - 0 2 13 8 B m si below,l certif that the previotisl Rtbti-ilue"'- '' '� 11 MAP conta"risthe hif6r ratio n rec b 15A t d 'W' S NCAC I SC .0,3107(c) for (lie project defined in the attach en in pkins and specifica,,tioti,s,. (TY p 0 r P r j ii t ii ain Q o, f t�t Lj t Ii o r 11, ze re P re I'l t a d v c of P u b 11" c W a t e r S e tti Lj,�.t Lig IMA, a � n, ati q e r (Title of at,,i thori zed rcpjv,,,sc,,.ta,tIvc orpublic'Watet, sysw�l"'s') ( Si g nature, tit, aut i 1-mized repesc�,nuativc of 1",Ilib Water S Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-21 i t (Date Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for Water Supply Systems In accordance with NCGS 130A -328, the Public Water Supply Section charges a fee for plan review. Any documents submitted for review must be accompanied by a check payable to DENR- Public Water Supply Section before the review will begin. There is a $25 fee for returned checks. The charges for review of plans are shown below. Check one of the following. Distribution System fees ® Construction of water lines, less than 5444 linear feet $150 El Construction of water lines, 5000 linear feet or more $200 El Other construction or alteration to a distribution system $ 75 Ground Water System fees El Construction of a new ground water system or adding a new well $200 [:1 Alteration to an existing ground water system $100 Surface water system fees ❑ Construction of a new surface water intake or treatment facility $250 ❑ Alteration to existing surface water intake or treatment facility $150 Other fees El Water System Management Plan review $ 75 El Miscellaneous changes or maintenance not covered above $ 50 Notes: 1. Projects for Tank Rehabilitation use separate "Application for Water Tank Reconditioning Plan Approval." 2. The fee is not refundable if the plans are not approved 3. Revisions to plans to address the Public Water Supply Section's or other state agency's comments do not incur an additional fee. 4. If one set of plans has multiple related items (such as a new well with construction of water lines) only one fee must be submitted for highest price item. The amounts are not cumulative, except for fees for Water System Management Plans. 5. If the appropriate plan review fee is not received within ten days after the receipt of plans and specifications for approval, then all plan documents wiII be recycled. A new set of documents must then be submitted with the appropriate fee for approval. This approval does not address all applicable laws, rules, standards and criteria, and other approvals and licenses that may be required by the local, state or federal government. The Public Water Supply Section. gives this approval with the understanding that upon installation of such works, its operation shall be placed under the care of a competent person, and the operation shall be carried out according to best accepted practice and in accordance with DENR's recommendations. The Public Water Supply Section has stamped and sealed the official copies of plans and specification! accompanying this application with the serial number of this application erasures, additions or alterations of the proposed improvements except those permitted in 15A NCAC make this approval null and void. DENR -21 35 (Revised 08/25/2011) Public Water Supply Section Any 18C .0305 Page 3 of 4 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -22 Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for Water Supply Systems Other Information and Checklist Pale ® Attached is a check for the proper plan review fee amount, in accordance with NCGS 130A -328. See note 4 on page 3. This submission includes three copies of each of the following items: This completed "Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for Water Supply Systems" ® The sealed plan drawings; AND ® The project-specific Engineering Report (ER) describing the scope and purpose of the project and addressing each of the items listed in 15A NCAC 18C .0307(b), including the design basis of the project.[15A NCAC 18C .0307(b)(12)]; One of the following: ® Attached are three sealed copies of the specifications for this project. OR ❑ The project will use the following system's previously approved standard specifications for waterline extensions: Name of System: Serial Number: The Serial Numbers for previously approved standard specifications can be found at the following website: http One of the following: ® Attached is a letter signed by an authorized representative of the Public water System agreeing to serve the project and stating that the system has adequate supply; OR ❑ The Applicant is the Public Water System. If the project has sought funding (for example, DwSRF loan) list the program and (if available) the application or funding number below: DENR -2136 (Revised 0812512011) Page 4 of 4 Public Water Supply Section Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -23 North Carolina Department of Environment And Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Public Water Supply Section Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications For Water Supply Systems Applicant Design Engineer Ridgewood Gardens Health Investors, LLC Phillip G. Tripp, P.E. (Name of Board, Council or Owner -- the Applicant) (Name of Design Engineer of Record) Ronald McNeil, Member Manager Tripp Engineering (Name and Title of Authorized Official or Representative of the (Name of Engineering Firm) Applicant) 2334 41st Street 419 Chestnut Street (Street or Box Number) (Street or Box Number) Wilmington, NC 28403 Wilmington, NC 28401 (City, State & ZIP) (City, State & ZIP) 910- 815 -3122 910 -763 -5100 (Phone Number) (Phone Number) 910 - 815 -3111 910-763-5631 (FAX Number) (FAX Number) trippeng @ec.rr.com mail ad ress) (Email address) S (Signature of Authorized Official or Representative of the Applicant) Project Name: Futch Creek Village (Name of Project to appear on Public Water Supply Section records and tracking system) 205 if of 4" SDR 21 PVC, 643 if of 4" C-900 PVC, and 384 if of 2" SDR 21 PVC water mian, valves, fittings and other apputentances (description of project) 8704 Market Street (general location of project) in New Hanover County. Date Serial No. (for DENR use only) (for DENR use only) Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -24 Application for Approval of En Plans and Specifica, t s for Water Suppl S L Divisia rte , ot"Water Resou-rce- De part tliletrl, of''" Enviroii,ir ,g,, Ap I . I plican applies u-, , e �r, an(] k,"i, t"011 accord with d -ovision of N"C(IS 31 7 I �1110A-, arid , str,ch, ot[ie!,r nrles as d he pi relate �ic P ublic water, s The Atithonized Offic"Aal C P IT S C n t,-,) t 1 v e 0 F fire Applicant, rep re s-c,;Lrr ts that fie is atill-iorized to the Ap The Auth,orized, ()IT' i I or" Rep t'esent�'at ive'. oft he Applicaint tiitidlerstainds -ind the I r) 0 fi(.� I 10 kv t 11 "Ai,rthoriz- ticrn to Con.stt-twt" ®. , "a, A,p not �-,t'vvard conti-fcts or be uiristFLIC-6"011 wilhou irst recc"Ilvin far em I")FNR. 2, "I "lie Appliearit sttipill uia,tc no ctiwn or viation f-'roin 0-1,i� (�)-) ri i ri plai.,is �aiid a 'b DENR e exxe as olloued b 'I SA NCAC I 8C -0300 or witl he i 3- Applicant 'n m: H I I n't will't"(11111 corrseiit and approval (,,)f'DE,NR,, i , obtain, ' irial Approval ftat'n, DEN' R, pr"lor toplacin g he pt-q ( ot&, ari pioi-tion the'reof 1,1i, to servi'Lle, An art ti'r or] zed 0 f t 11, er, 'I'lif 1) 1 ic W a te I * S V'ster n 1), is t " si tile t"011ow , iirig'WSMP section- , u t1hc san-w as the Applica. plete and St a t als; o f Wa 1-1 e -r S y s tent M a n oa g e, )n et'la i n Ch,eck one oftl 161jowrrr and if a provideth(,, ro ( J, -) -,, ti e I J nfi 1 tri a i 011 '11-i e W SM P 1 7or. dIQ proj ect, as d, e fi Ii ed fri the c lied, e n I rice I'li-I P I all S ar)(I Spec i t-icati o ns, h as n ot bo su bi'll itl.,ed Three, C ople's of the WSM P for thc project, as, kfined iri flie attactied, pl`.ans and, specifications, �are s u b tvi 71 tted w, it 'h, 11 1 s a,", pp I i c a t 1 on, al +'.r'• WSMP 11]-Iat inctud, es t1liLs P ro j ect, as, deflnied, In the anuelied, eii plain �sT, Nva.s previousl s and speeff1ication, stibn-iated, Vrovide the 1 " flowhi Public Walet- S c," ("',ai c,, i;, �a r, P u b 1,11 c Ut " ir Y Ware' S, y stetti No, NC 0 4 - 6,.',,-) 10 S e n a I N'ti rn b,e: T of a"pp ro v e d W'S M P: 9 0 21. 3 8 B m st below, Iceretit" itiat thQ j v�,:,vlotisl stibnrilte(] 'WSMP re I-) 15A ,) NC.A.0 I 8C .030'7(c) 1"Or the pr defrtied in the C',tttached C11,111,1 I 9 - n plans ar')d, s'peelfications, h rJ, s t ez,, M J,, h o, 11 1 (F or j :vint i-1tti,111c, ol-authorlized Of'PUbfic-' Wimcl 'S ve olA, ttbhc kVater Systern ("I"4k: ol"', ,1.Jlbc�xrj Zzed� A at ve Of PUblic Wtita� - S zi,(,( DENR-2136 �,RevlseW 08/25/2,011) Pi.,iblic Water Supply,13ecrion Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-25 at Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for Water Supply Systems In accordance with NCGS 130A-328, the Public Water Supply Section charges a fee for plan review. Any documents submitted for review must be accompanied by a check payable to DENR-- Puhlrc Water Supply Section before the review wiII begin. There is a $25 fee for returned checks. The charges for review of plans are shown below. Check one of the following. Distribution System fees ® Construction of water lines, less than 5000 linear feet $150 El Construction of water lines, 5000 linear feet or more $200 El Other construction or alteration to a distribution system $ 75 Ground water System fees El Construction of a new ground water system or adding a new well $200 El Alteration to an existing ground water system $100 Surface water system fees El Construction of a new surface water intake or treatment facility $250 El Alteration to existing surface water intake or treatment facility $I So Other fees El Water System Management Plan review $ 75 El Miscellaneous changes or maintenance not covered above $ so Notes: 1. Projects for Tank Rehabilitation use separate "Application for Water Tank Reconditioning Plan Approval." 2. The fee is not refundable if the plans are not approved 3. Revisions to plans to address the Public Water Supply Section's or other state agency's comments do not incur an additional fee. 4. If one set of plans has multiple related items (such as a new well with construction of water lines) only one fee must be submitted for highest price item. The amounts are not cumulative, except for fees for Water System Management Plans. 5. If the appropriate plan review fee is not received within ten days after the receipt of plans and specifications for approval, then all plan documents will be recycled. A new set of documents must then be submitted with the appropriate fee for approval. This approval does not address all applicable laws, rules, standards and criteria, and other approvals and licenses that may be required by the local, state or federal government. The Public Water Supply Section gives this approval with the understanding that upon installation of such works, its operation shall be placed under the care of a competent person, and the operation shall be carried out according to best accepted practice and in accordance with DENR's recommendations. The Public Water Supply Section has stamped and sealed the official copies of plans and specifications accompanying this application with the serial number of this application . A erasures, additions or alterations of the proposed improvements except those permitted in 15A NCAC 18C .0306 make this approval null and void. ...... ....... ... .... ..... .... ...... . ... . ... .. . .. .. .. .... .... .. ..... .. ..... . .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . ... ... ...... ... . . ... . . .. .. .. .............. ............................ ..... ........... ..... . ... .... ... ........... . ...... .... .... ........ .. ........ ..... .... ... .... ...... .. . ..... ..... ............ .. .. ...... ......... . .... .. .. . . . ..... .... . .. ... ...... ... .. ...... .. .. ........ ... ... .... . .. ... .. ... .. .. .. ... .... ..... .... ...... .. ... .... .... .. ............. ............ ...... .. ... .. ..... ....... ............. ... ....... ...... . . . ..... .. ...... ... ... ..... ....... ..... ...... ......... ........ ....... ............... .. ... ... .. . This approval does not constitute a warranty of the design, construction or future operation of the water system. Signed: Public water Supply Section DENR DENR --2136 (Revised 08/25/2011) Page 3 of 4 Public Water Supply Section Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -26 Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for water Supply Systems Other Information and Checklist Page ® Attached is a check for the proper plan review fee amount, in accordance with NCGS 130A --328. See note 4 on page 3. This submission includes three copies of each of the following items: ® This completed "'Application for Approval of Engineering Plans and Specifications for Water Supply Systems" ® The sealed plan drawings; AND ® The project-specific Engineering Report (ER) describing the scope and purpose of the project and addressing each of the items listed in 15A NCAC 18C .0307(b), including the design basis of the project. [ 15A NCAC 18C .o3o7(b )( 1 2)j; One of the following: ® Attached are three sealed copies of the specifications for this project. OR ❑ The project will use the following system's previously approved standard specifications for waterline extensions: Name of System: Serial Number: The Serial Numbers for previously approved standard specifications can be found at the following website: http://www.ncwater.org/pws/PlanReview/stdspecs.html One of the following: ® Attached is a letter signed by an authorized representative of the Public water System agreeing to serve the project and stating that the system has adequate supply; OR [:1 The Applicant is the Public Water System. If the project has sought funding (for example, DwSRF loan) list the program and (if available) the application or funding number below: DENR -2136 (Revised 08/25/2011) Public Water Supply Section Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -27 Page 4 of 4 5h. Core Requirement Three (CR3) Significant Species and Ecological Communities - Option One Option 1: After consultation with the NC Natural Heritage Program map as found on the New Hanover County online mapping services, no species present or likely to be present that are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act, NC endangered species list or listed in the NC Natural Heritage Program as either Nationally, State or Regionally Significant. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -28 From: Finne John [john.finne Sent: Monda April 23, 2012 10:53 AM To: Sarah Gre Subject: RE: Maps for NHC Zonin Re Futch Creek Villa We have no records for y our pro site that indicate the presence of an federal or state endan species, nor an species currentl tracked b the NC Natural Herita Pro John Finne Conservation Information Mana 919-707-8630 North Carolina Natural Herita Pro Office of Conservation, Plannin and Communit Affairs North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC Ralei NC 27699-1601 Email correspondence to and from this address is sub to the North Carolina Public Records Law and ma be disclosed to third parties. From: Sarah Gre [mai Ito: saLah regorygls3p.com] Sent: Frida April 20, 2012 4:51 PM To: Finne John Subject: Maps for NHC Zonin Re Futch Creek Villa John, Thanks for callin me back. I have to meet the followin zonin re I "After consultation with the NC Natural Herita Pro map as founi • the New Hanover Count online mappin services, no species present or likel to be present that are listed under the federal Endan Species Act, NC endan species list or listed in the NC Natural Herita Pro as either Nationall State or Re Si I I have attached some PDFs of our site to show its location. It is j ust north of Wilmin in New Hanover Count It fronts onto Old Market Street, j ust east of where hi 17 mer with Market Street. Let me know if y ou need an else. Thank y ou, Sarah Gre AIA, LEED AP PROJECT MANAGER Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8 -10 -29 file:///Jl/ ... ments/030 APPROVALS /039 -NHC Zonin Natural Herita Pro Species.htm[5/4/2012 11:02:50 AM] 5i. Core Requirement Four (CR4) Wetland and Water Body Conservation and Preservation - Option Two Requirement To prevent bacterial contamination of surface water, install pet waste stations within required open spaces and implement a maintenance schedule for the pet waste stations (4/6/10) -and- Option 2: Locate project such that pre - project jurisdictional wetlands, water bodies (including but not limited to intermittent and perennial streams), and land within 100 feet of such areas shall not experience significant destruction or lasting detrimental effects to water quality or other protected natural resources as a result of new development. Significant destruction shall include the construction, excavation, deposition, of materials in, over or on such land or any work that would affect the course, location, condition, or capacity of the receiving water body. Implementation To prevent degradation of water quality and foster the preservation of natural hydrology, habitat, and biodiversity, the pockets of wetlands on the site will not be disturbed. A 100' setback off of the wetland will be observed, only allowing minimal access roads as required by local requirements, and pervious mulch foot paths for the recreational enjoyment of the natural areas by the tenants. The main entry road will be placed over the top of the current access road on the property. The secondary access road will be placed along the property line just beyond the wetlands. All other developments will happen outside of the buffer zone. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -30 ti ■ A � bb r N, 010 J ne U / 0- Ns%s.� L. 5 � � N � O � U O O Core Requirement Four (CR4)- Wetland Conservation To prevent degradation of water quality and foster the preservation of natural hydrology, habitat and biodiversity, the pockets of wetlands on the site will not be disturbed. A 100 ft. setback off of the wetlands will be observed. No significant destruction of the buffers or wetlands w i l l result from the new development. Two narrow roads, pervious mulch multiuse paths, and minor site maintenance will occur in the 100' buffer to the wetlands. The wetlands w i l l remain intact with no anticipated mitigation. Many options have been considered for crossing the buffer zone to access the rear of the property. Providing minimal narrow paved roads with vegetative filter strips on each side has risen as the most responsible solution. Providing sheet flow drainage from the roadway that is passed th ru vegetative filter strips w i l l help to recharge the wetlands. Pervious pavement was eliminated due to the low lying locations of the buffer zones. This will cause the pavement to constantly fill up with sediment and eliminate any pervious attributes of the roads. A pervious surface would also direct less water back into the wetlands. Bridging the wetlands was considered, however to provide a bridge that would meet local fire and emergency standards for weights and access would require a bridge with substantial foundations. These foundations and their construction would intrude on the wetlands, not just the buffer zone. As the property is currently zoned, almost all of wetlands would need to be mitigated to accommodate as much single family density as is allowed under R -15. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -32 5j. Core Requirement Five (CR5) Floodplain Avoidance, Option One. Requirement Option 1: Locate on a site that does not contain any land within a 100 -year floodploin. Implementation The site does not contain any land within a 100 -year flood plain. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -33 5k. Core Requirement Six (CR6) Storm Water Management. Requirement Implement a comprehensive stormwater management plan for the project that infiltrates and reuses stormwater runoff. Stormwater shall be managed following the principles prescribed in the New Hanover County -City of Wilmington Joint Low Impact Development Manual and will enable a project to use the LID -EZ Spreadsheet Tool. A determination that a project qualifies as a Low Impact Development shall be made by the Technical Review Committee (TRC). Implementation The stormwater design shall follow the Low Impact Development Manual and use the LID -EZ Spreadsheet Tool. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -35 USN Associa,tes I td. 2528 Independence Blvd, Suite 200 Wilmin NC 28412 Attn,.- Sarah Gre y 16 Relo Futch Creck Villa Stormwater LID 011, Please contact us with an q uestions. comments or, if y ou need additional, Infornnation. Thank y ou. 05k Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-10-36 51. Additional Requirement One (AR1) Bicycle and pedestrian access. Requirements Include a pedestrian or bicycle through- connection in at least 90% of any new cul -de- sacs, except where prohibited by topographical conditions. Provide bicycle parking and storage for developments that contain multifamily, retail and New Hanover commercial development. Provide convenient access and off -site connections to all constructed or planned bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure networks. Implementation We propose an 8' multi -use path that will circle the site, allowing residents and others to walk or ride bicycles with two way traffic. This path will be composed of pervious mulch where it meanders through the preserved wetland buffer areas. Along this path will be pet waste stations, benches, and bird watching locations with educational information on local birds, plants and the wetlands. Additionally, the site will provide a path from end to end along the road frontage, which could provide connection for a future interconnected neighborhood system. At the road frontage, we propose a shelter which could serve as an entry element for the development, and also allow a respite for bikers and walkers. Bicycle racks will be provided at each residential building, the clubhouse and at the shelter. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -37 LL EL LL 00 0- mmmmmwftw� mow W#ft, mow *M ------- . . .......... . 5m. Additional Requirement Three (AR3) Diversity of Uses. Include a residential component in the project that constitutes at least 25% of the project's total building square footage and design or locate the project such that at least 50% of the dwelling units are within % mile walk distance of the number of diverse uses in the approved diversity of uses table. At least one use from two of the three diversity of uses list is required. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -39 5n. Additional Requirement Six (AR6) Certified Green Building Requirement Design, construct, or retrofit one whole residential or non - residential building to be certified through: LEED, NAHB Green Building Standards, North Carolina Healthy Built Homes or Green Globes. Implementation The Futch Creek Village Club House will be designed to LEED, NAHB Green Building Standards, North Carolina Healthy Built Homes or Green Globes. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -41 o LLJ J m � 0 s �- roll f Q LU LL. J on W e Z t� a, w � � 2 3 N Cn - L O � J �e WCC Ki bi w d� J � l i � N N O O k, V Z D w J V - D ro CC CL � Z w w. co n w V� w t D I D LL Q O W J W W � L LA O w 2c O U � � - r j W S 2 s Z O LL U m C: Z V V 3 • u w Z - L �e w U- U � N N § N ( Y 7 �, .. -.. ism• LU a. to W t O (n W J } i , a, e a '00 n. w J C � L J T a. i w t D I D LL Q O W J W W � L LA O w 2c O U � � - r j W S 2 s Z O LL U m C: Z V V 3 • u 50. Additional Requirement Seven (AR7) Minimum Energy Efficiency. Requirement For non - residential building, mixed use buildings, and multifamily residential buildings four stories or greater, new buildings must be on average 10% better than ANSI /ASHRAE /IESNA Standard 90.1 -2007. For new multifamily residential buildings three stories or fewer and new single-family residential buildings: 90% of new buildings must meet Energy Star criteria. Implementation All multifamily residential buildings will be three stories or less and meet Energy Star criteria. All non - residential buildings will be 10% better than ANSI /ASHRAE /IESNA Standard 90.1 -2007. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -43 LL LL moo *ftwft� ....... ....... ....... ....... *0 RIX; 5p. Additional Requirement Eight (AR8) Water Efficient Landscaping. Requirement Reduce potable water consumption for outdoor landscape irrigation by limiting turf to 25% or less, incorporating rainwater catchment system(s) such as rain barrels or cisterns into the project, installing drip irrigation and utilizing stormwater for landscape irrigation. Implementation Futch Creek Village will limit turf grass to less than 25% of the total 37.2 acres. Drip and temporary irrigation will be used in the landscaped areas. Landscape materials will focus on native plants. Rain barrels will be used to supplement irrigation at ornamental planting locations. Rain water harvesting techniques will be investigated for feasibility at the community club house. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -10 -45 O (i Z U LLJ L40r) U r) C < z (t < CL > Z LLJ LLJ LLJ Z-1 B 0 m ri U7� D D LL LL F— Ln Ln ois mom affimww*—%� K 1AN loln'jolLN PK') ------ — --- — --- . ................. ------- . . . . ............................... — ------------------ U) Lr) Z Z 0 U U 0 0 LLJ � m V LL Z Cie ce Q 0 LLJ LLJ Llr) V) 0 0 CL CL 0 0 rvo m 4-j U u LLJ =3 u A l u U U IN P, J. LLJ LLJ 4-1 CZ LL LL- �' I D —C Lu C:) LLJ u V u C) u U %Z LL rn (t C) u L� 4t 19 e— aE.I! R rmri rM4 r- Ln in rl Pli g, r4 m m �rn c - al WT rA4 7 LL, Lei 41, ID mt WD -4 M 0 &q 4 50" M 4n #J� Ln J. "', 'D rN, Ln L"q r- 1LS ID ' C 2 Ln' kla 1A air I r,4 r;4 M, I ch rl C� 7M r-I r-J 1,6 YL- 0 ON L, N� 0 L2 '4"n f14 04, S� �o C -L L . .. .. ... ... 97 13 , ma O (i Z U LLJ L40r) U r) C < z (t < CL > Z LLJ LLJ LLJ Z-1 B 0 m ri U7� D D LL LL F— Ln Ln ois mom affimww*—%� K 1AN loln'jolLN PK') ------ — --- — --- . ................. ------- . . . . ............................... — ------------------ U) Lr) Z Z 0 U U 0 0 LLJ � m V LL Z Cie ce Q 0 LLJ LLJ Llr) V) 0 0 CL CL 0 0 rvo m DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FLITCH CREEK VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PARK Prepared by: Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC,16 North Fifth Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28401 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER This DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR FLITCH CREEK VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PARK (herein, the "Declaration "), is made and entered into on this the day of 1 2012 by RIDGEWOOD GARDEN HEALTH INVESTORS, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company (herein, "Declarant "); WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property located in the New Hanover County, North Carolina which property is described herein; and WHEREAS, this Declaration is being executed and recorded by Declarant in order to facilitate the development of Futch Creek Village Commercial Park as an integrated business and commercial development to be known as " Futch Creek Village Commercial Park" and to fix and establish certain covenants, conditions and restrictions upon and subject to which Futch Creek Village Commercial Park shall be improved, held, leased, sold and /or conveyed; and NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that all the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and any additional real property as may, by subsequent amendment and /or supplement hereto, be added to and subjected to this Declaration, is held and shall be held, conveyed, encumbered, leased, rented, used, occupied and improved subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, which shall run with the land and shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in and to Futch Creek Commercial Park or any part or parts thereof, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. 108412.3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -1 ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS The following terms shall, except where the context otherwise requires, have the meanings hereinafter specified: " Additional Property shall mean any of the real property located within two (2) miles of Futch Creek Commercial Park, any of which may hereafter be annexed to and made a part of Futch Creek Commercial Park and subjected to the terms and conditions of this Declaration. "Architectural Review Committee" or the "ARC ": means the committee of the Association as specified in Article 6, to interpret and enforce the Design Guidelines, as further provided in Article 6. "Area of Common Responsibility" shall mean the Common Area, together with such other areas, if any, for which the Association has or assumes responsibility pursuant to the terms of this Declaration, any Supplemental Declaration, or other applicable covenants, contracts, or agreements. "Articles" shall mean the Articles of Incorporation of the Association, as amended from time to time. "Assessments" shall mean and refer collectively to all assessments of any kind or nature provided for in this Declaration (including, without limitation, Master, Special and Specific Assessments). "Association" shall mean Futch Creek Village Owners' Association, Inc., a North Carolina non- profit corporation, its successors and assigns, which shall be comprised of owners of Futch Creek Commercial Park and owner(s) of Futch Creek Village Community. "Board of Directors" or "Board" shall mean the duly elected and constituted Executive Board of the Association. "Building" shall mean any structure in Futch Creek Commercial Park which (i) is permanently affixed to the land, (ii) has one or more floors and a roof, (iii) is normally accessible for human use, and (iv) has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy by the applicable government authority. "Bylaws" shall mean the Bylaws of the Association, as amended from time to time. "Common Areas" shall mean any and all real and personal property (including any related equipment, fixtures, and apparatus), and all other easements and /or other interests in real property from time to time, including easements and private streets and roads, which either (i) the Association owns, leases or otherwise holds possessory or use rights in for the common use and enjoyment of the Owners and /or (ii) the Declarant has designated or designates in the future in the Declaration or a Recorded plat or other Recorded instrument as existing for the common use and enjoyment of some or all of the Owners. The Common Areas shall include, without limitation, the following: (a) All roadways, driveways, curb cuts, aisles, walkways and sidewalks now or hereafter constructed within Futch Creek Village and reasonably intended to be used for ingress and egress to, from and through Futch Creek Village (but excluding any parking areas located solely on a single Lot which shall not be part of the Common Area) and all rights of way landscaping of such roads and streets; 108412.3 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -2 (v) All entrance features, including signage and associate lighting, entrance walls, fences, and landscaping thereof so designated by the Declarant or the Board; (d) All drainage easements or stormwater holding, detention and /or retention ponds identified and described in the stormwater permit issued to Declarant for development of Futch Creek Commercial Park; and (e) Any area or portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park designated by the Declarant within this Declaration or any amendment or supplement or on any Plat as a Common Area. " Common Expenses shall mean the actual and estimated expenses incurred, or anticipated to be incurred, by the Association for the general benefit of the Owners, together with any allocation to reserves, as the Board may find necessary and appropriate pursuant to the Governing Documents, including, without limitation, those items further described in Article 16 below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) Common Expenses shall not include any expenses incurred during the Class "B" Control Period for initial development or other original construction costs unless Voting Members representing a majority of the total Class "A" vote of the Association approve and (ii) payments due under leases of capital improvements such as street lights shall not be considered an initial development or original construction cost. " Community -Wide Standard shall mean the standard of conduct, maintenance, or other activity generally prevailing at Futch Creek Commercial Park, or the minimum standards established pursuant to the Design Guidelines, Restrictions and Rules, and Board resolutions, whichever is a highest standard. Declarant shall establish initially such standard and it may contain both objective and subjective elements. The Community -Wide Standard may evolve as development progresses and as the needs and desires within Futch Creek Commercial Park change. " Cost Sharing Agreement shall mean any agreement, contract, or covenant between the Declarant (and /or the Association) and an owner of, operator of, or property association having jurisdiction over property within, adjacent to, or in the vicinity of Futch Creek Commercial Park (including, without limitation, any landscaping located on a public right of way or any Private Amenity) pursuant to this Declaration, creating easements, rights, or obligations for the benefit of the Association and /or the present and future owners of the subject real property and providing for the sharing of the expenses of the same, including but not limited to any costs of maintaining property described in that document with adjacent properties. " Declarant " shall mean RIDGEWOOD GARDEN HEALTH INVESTORS, L.L.C., or any successor or assign who both: 1) takes title to any portion of the property in Futch Creek Commercial Park for the purpose of development and /or sale; and 2) who or which is specifically granted some or all of Declarant's rights pursuant to a recorded instrument executed by the immediately preceding Declarant. " Declaration " shall mean this Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Futch Creek Commercial Park, as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time. " Directors " shall mean the persons serving from time to time on the Board. 108412.3 3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -3 " Futch Creek Village Commercial Park or " Futch Creek Commercial Park shall consist of all the real property that is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together with such additional property as is subjected to this Declaration in accordance with Article 19. " Futch Creek Village Community shall mean the residential real property described as , which is expected but not guaranteed to include apartments. " Futch Creek Village shall mean, for the purposes of this Declaration, Tracts 1 and Tract 2 of Futch Creek Village as shown on a map recorded in Map Book 51, Page 3 of the New Hanover County Registry, which Tracts 2 includes both Futch Creek Village Commercial Park and Futch Creek Village Community. " Governing Documents A collective term referring to the Declaration and any applicable Supplemental Declarations, the Bylaws, the Articles, the Design Guidelines, the Restrictions and Rules, Board resolutions, and Recorded plats of Futch Creek Commercial Park, as any one or more of which may be amended from time to time. " shall mean and refer to any lot, parcel or tract of land within Futch Creek Commercial Park owned by the Declarant or any lot, parcel or tract of land subdivided out of Futch Creek Commercial Park by Declarant and either conveyed to another person or entity or specifically identified by Declarant as a "Lot" in an amendment or supplement to this Declaration or on a Plat which is hereafter filed and recorded by Declarant in the Registry, but excluding any Common Areas that are owned in fee simple by the Association. "Members " shall mean the members of the Association as further provided in Section 4.01. " Mortgage " with an initial capital letter, shall mean and refer to a mortgage, deed of trust, installment land sales contract and security agreement or other similar security interest instrument granting, creating or conveying a lien upon, a security interest in, or a security encumbered title to a Lot. " Mortgagee " with initial capital letter, shall mean and refer to the holder of a Mortgage. " Owner " shall mean the owner of any part of Futch Creek Commercial Park, as shown on the records of the Register of Deeds of New Hanover County, North Carolina, as of the date of any action to be taken by such Owner under the provisions of this Declaration. " Person " shall mean an individual, corporation, trustee, partnership, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or other legal entity. " Plats " shall mean the plats of Futch Creek Commercial Park or any property annexed thereto which are recorded by Declarant in the Registry, as same may be amended from time to time. " Property " shall mean the real property described in the Original Declaration, any Supplements or Amendments thereto, or on Exhibit "A" attached hereto together with any Additional Property subject to or which may become subject to these Restrictions. 108412.3 4 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -4 " Record " " Recording " or " Recorded ": The filing of a legal instrument in the New Hanover County, North Carolina land records or such other place as may be designated as the official location for recording deeds, plats, and similar documents affecting title to real estate. " Registry " shall mean the Office of the Register of Deeds of New Hanover County, North Carolina. " Restrictions " shall mean the covenants, conditions, restrictions and other terms and provisions of the Declaration, as amended from time to time, upon and subject to which Futch Creek Commercial Park, or any part thereof, shall be improved, held, leased, sold and /or conveyed, all as hereinafter set forth. " Rules and Regulations shall mean those reasonable rules and regulations governing building and maintenance standards for and the use, enjoyment and operation of Futch Creek Commercial Park (including, without limitation, all Lots, the Common Areas, and any combination thereof) which may be adopted, altered, amended, rescinded, and enforced by the Association, through its Board, from time to time, as more particularly described in Article 5. " Structure " shall mean any physical object temporarily or permanently affixed to Futch Creek Commercial Park, except grass, shrubbery, trees or other landscaping. ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PURPOSES OF RESTRICTIONS Futch Creek Commercial Park is hereby subjected to the Restrictions for the following purposes, which purposes are not, and are not intended to be, exhaustive or exclusive: (a) To encourage development of Futch Creek Commercial Park in a manner which is free from toxic and noxious matter and other hazards, and from offensive noises and odors and other objectionable influences. (b) To promote the proper and most desirable use and development of Futch Creek Commercial Park in accordance with a well considered plan and scheme of development. (c) To conserve and enhance the value of Lots and Buildings of Owners of Futch Creek Commercial Park. (d) To protect against construction on Lots or Structures which is of poor design or quality and to encourage construction of improvements utilizing good quality and attractive material and good architectural and planning standards compatible with other improvements on Futch Creek Commercial Park. (e) To preserve and enhance Futch Creek Commercial Park and provide for the orderly management of the Common Areas. ARTICLE 3 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.01 Owner's Easements of Enjoyment Every Owner shall have, and Declarant hereby grants 108412.3 5 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -5 to every Owner, itself and the Association, a nonexclusive right and easement of enjoyment and use in and to the Common Areas and, whether or not designated as Common Area and regardless of fee simple ownership, all roadways, walkways, sidewalks, parking surfaces, entries and exits of Futch Creek Commercial Park, which easement shall be appurtenant to and pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the provisions of this Declaration, including but not limited to, the following provisions: (a) The right (but not the obligation) of the Association, following approval of the Board, to (i) dedicate or transfer all or any portion of the Roads to any public agency or governmental entity so that such Roads shall be maintained as public roads and (ii) dedicate or transfer to any public or private utility or governmental authority drainage, sewage and/or utility easements on any part of the Common Areas, all subject to such conditions as the Board may determine is reasonable. The rights of the Association under this Section 3.01(a) shall not be subject to the provisions of Section 3.01(d) below. (b) The right of the Association, subject to the provisions of Section 3.01(d) below, to mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise encumber any or all of the Association's real or personal property as security for money borrowed or debts incurred for the purpose of improving or maintaining the Common Areas or providing the services authorized by this Declaration; provided, however, that the Association shall not be entitled to encumber (i) the Roads, drainage easements or stormwater holding, detention and /or retention ponds, or (ii) any real estate which is not owned in fee simple by the Association unless the fee simple owner of the applicable easement area consents thereto (it being agreed that the provisions of this paragraph following the phrase "provided, however," may not be amended without the consent of all Owners which would be affected thereby). (c) The right of the Association, subject to the provisions of Section 3.01(d) below, to give or sell or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Common Areas to any governmental entity, public authority, public service district, or public utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed upon by the Members as provided in Section 3.01(d) below; provided, however, that (i) this Section 3.01(c) shall not permit the Association to materially alter or deny access over the Roads to an Owner's Lot unless such Owner consents thereto and (ii) the Association shall not be entitled to transfer any real estate under this Section 3.01(c) which is not owned in fee simple by the Association unless the fee simple owner of the applicable easement area consents thereto (the provisions of this paragraph following the phrase "provided, however," may not be amended without the consent of all Owners which would be affected thereby). (d) The rights of the Association under Sections 3.01(b) and (c) above are subject to authorization by the affirmative vote of sixty-seven (67 %) of the votes cast at a duly called meeting of the Association, subject to the quorum requirements established by Article 4, and subject to the requirement that written notice of the meeting and of the proposed action is sent to every Member of the Association at least ten (10) days but not more than (60) days prior to such meeting. A true copy of such resolution, together with a certificate of the results of the vote taken thereon, shall be made and acknowledged by the President or Vice President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Association and such certificate shall be annexed to any instrument affecting the Common Areas. Such certificates shall be conclusive evidence of authorization by the membership. 3.02 Limitations Upon Use of Common Areas As provided in Section 5.04, the Board may establish reasonable rules and regulations concerning the use of the Common Areas and facilities located thereon. 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -6 3.03 Owner's Maintenance and Repair of Lots (a) Each Owner shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain his or her Lot and all landscaping and improvements comprising the Lot in a manner consistent with the requirements and standards in the Governing Documents, the Community -Wide Standard and all applicable covenants. (b) Without limiting the foregoing, each Owner shall maintain, repair, service, replace and resurface its Lot, including without limitation, all landscaping, parking surfaces, parking lot lights, irrigation systems, dumpster enclosures, equipment and personal property constituting part of its Lot so as to keep all of the foregoing in good, clean, attractive, sanitary, safe and serviceable condition, order and repair, consistent with that of a first class project. (c) Provided however, to ensure consistency in the appearance and to protect property values, Declarant during the Class B Control Period and thereafter, the Association, may in its sole discretion, require that all Lot landscaping, parking surface maintenance, parking lot light maintenance, irrigation system maintenance, trash and recyclables removal, and /or grease trap maintenance be performed by the same company or provider for the applicable service on all Common Areas and all Lots within a Village. In such event, the costs of any such services allocated to each Lot shall be the responsibility of the applicable Owner and shall be billed directly to and paid directly by each Owner. Nothing in this section shall be construed to obligate Declarant or the Association to require the use of the same company or provider for maintenance services. In addition, Declarant during the Class B Control Period and thereafter, the Association, shall be permitted to modify or cancel existing contracts for services in its discretion after first providing each Owner with reasonable notice. ARTICLE 4 ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION OF ASSOCIATION 4.01 Membership. Every Owner of a Lot shall be a Member of the Association during the period such Owner holds its fee simple interest. If fee simple title to a Lot is held by more than one person, each such person shall be a Member but the voting rights with respect to such Lot shall be exercised jointly in the manner hereinafter provided. An Owner of more than one Lot is entitled to one membership for each Lot owned. Each membership is appurtenant to and may not be separated from the Lot upon which it is based and such membership shall be transferred automatically by conveyance of fee simple title to that Lot. No person other than a fee simple Owner of a Lot may be a Member of the Association, and a membership in the Association may not be transferred except by the transfer of title to a Lot. 4.02 Voting. The Association shall have two (2) classes of voting membership. The votes aggregated from both voting memberships shall constitute the total outstanding votes available for voting purposes in determining the action of the Association on any matter to be approved by vote (herein "Outstanding Votes "). (a) Class "A ". So long as there is Class B membership, "Class A Members" shall be all Owners except the Declarant. The number of votes appurtenant to a Lot owned by a Class A Member shall be computed as follows: The number obtained by rounding the total acreage of an Owner's Lot to the nearest 108412.3 7 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -7 whole number shall be the total number of votes appurtenant to such Owner's Lot (i.e., there shall be no fractional votes). Upon termination of the Class B membership, Class A Members shall be all Owners, including the Declarant (assuming Declarant remains an Owner). (b) Class "B " . The "Class B Member" shall be the Declarant. The Class B Member may appoint and remove the members of the Board during the Class B Control Period (as defined herein). During the Class B Control Period, the number of votes that the Class B Member shall be entitled to cast in Association matters shall be determined as follows: The number obtained by rounding the total acreage of the Class B Member's owned portions of Futch Creek Commercial Park and the Additional Property (which can be calculated together or separated into lots as shown on a site plan) to the nearest whole number, and multiplying such whole number by 3 shall be the total number of votes appurtenant to the Class B Member's property. The Class B membership shall cease to exist and shall automatically be converted to Class A membership upon the termination of the Class B Control Period (as defined herein). For purposes of this Declaration, the "Class B Control Period" shall mean the period beginning on the date of this Declaration and terminating upon the earliest to occur of the following events: (i) the voluntary relinquishment by the Declarant of its right to Class B membership by an instrument recorded in the Registry; (ii) the date on which the Declarant no longer owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or any Additional Property; or (iii) December 31, 2032. 4.03 Amplification The provisions of this Declaration may be implemented and amplified by the Association's Articles and Bylaws; but no such implementation or amplification shall alter or amend substantially any of the rights or obligations of the Owners set forth in this Declaration. The provisions of this Declaration and the Articles and Bylaws shall be interpreted, construed, and applied to avoid inconsistencies or conflicting results. If such conflict necessarily results, however, the provisions of this Declaration shall control anything in the Articles or Bylaws to the contrary. ARTICLE 5 RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION 5.01 Common Areas Subject to the rights of Owners and Declarant as set forth in this Declaration, the Association has exclusive management and control of the Common Areas and all improvements thereon and all furnishings, equipment and other personal property relating thereto. (a) The Association's duties with respect to such Common Areas include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the management, operation, maintenance, repair, servicing, replacement and renewal of all landscaping, improvements, irrigation systems, equipment and personal property constituting part of the Common Areas or located upon the Common Areas so as to keep all of the 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -8 foregoing in good, clean, attractive, sanitary, safe and serviceable condition, order and repair; (ii) all landscaping and irrigation of the Common Areas and landscaped areas and islands within Road right of ways, whether public or private; (iii) the maintenance of adequate public liability, property casualty and hazard insurance for the benefit of the Association with respect to the Common Areas; (iv) the payment of all taxes and assessments validly levied, assessed or imposed with respect to Common Areas. The Association also may provide other services, such as, but not limited to, security services as the Association deems appropriate. (b) In the event that the need for maintenance upon or replacement of the Common Areas is caused (i) by construction activities on a Lot by an Owner or its agents or contractors, or (ii) by the willful or negligent acts of any Owner or its agents or contractors, then the cost of such maintenance, replacement or repairs shall be borne exclusively by such Owner, shall be added to and become a part of the assessments to the Lot or Lots of such Owner, and shall constitute a Specific Assessment. 5.02 Services The Association may obtain and pay for the services of any person to manage its affairs to the extent the Board deems advisable, as well as such other personnel as are furnished or employed directly by the Association or by any person with whom it contracts. Without limitation, the Board may obtain and pay for legal and accounting services necessary or desirable in connection with the Common Areas or its duties and rights under this Declaration, the Articles, the Bylaws and /or the Rules and Regulations (as defined in Article 1); provided, however, the Declarant shall bear all costs to establish this Declaration and related documents required to initially establish the Association. 5.03 Property Owned by Association; Conveyance of Common Areas by Declarant The Association may acquire, hold, and dispose of real property and tangible and intangible personal property, subject to such restrictions as from time to time may be contained in the Articles and Bylaws. The Declarant agrees to convey to the Association (by easement or in fee simple) the then - established Common Areas within three (3) months following the termination of the Class B membership; provided, however, the Declarant shall be entitled, in the Declarant's sole discretion, to convey all or any portion of the Common Areas to the Association prior to the deadline provided above. The Association shall accept title to such Common Areas subject to all easements, encumbrances and restrictions of record. All costs, if any, associated with such transfer or assignment shall be borne by the Declarant. 5.04 Rules and Regulations The Rules and Regulations shall be consistent with the rights and duties established by this Declaration (although same may further restrict the use of the Common Areas). The Rules and Regulations shall be binding upon the Owners, and, subject to applicable laws, the Association shall have the right to establish penalties and fines for any infractions of this Declaration, the Articles, the Bylaws and the Rules and Regulations (including, without limitation, monetary fines and other sanctions for violation of the rules which may be collected by a lien and foreclosure as a Specific Assessment). The validity of the Association's Rules and Regulations, and their enforcement, shall be determined by a standard of reasonableness for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of Futch Creek Commercial Park as a first class project. 5.05 Implied Rights The Association may exercise any other right, power or privilege given to it expressly by this Declaration, its Articles or Bylaws, and every other right, power, or privilege reasonably to be implied from the existence of any right, power, or privilege so granted or reasonably to effectuate the exercise of any right, power, or privilege so granted. The Association shall have the 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -9 power to do any and all lawful things which may be authorized, required, or permitted to be done by the Association under and by virtue of this Declaration and to do and perform any and all acts which may be necessary or proper for or incidental to the exercise of any of the express powers of the Association for the safety and /or general welfare of the Owners. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, after two (2) days' written notice with a specified time stated to adhere to the provisions set forth herein, the Association shall have the power and authority at any time and from time to time, without liability to any Owner, to enter onto any Lot for the purpose of enforcing any and all of the provisions called for herein, or for the purpose of maintaining and repairing any such Lot if, for any reason whatsoever, the Owner thereof fails to maintain or repair such Lot as required pursuant to this Declaration, whereupon the Association may assess all costs incurred against the Lot as a Specific Assessment. The Association shall also have the power and authority from time to time, in its own name, on its own behalf or on behalf of any Owner or Owners who consent thereto, to commence and maintain actions and suits to restrain or enjoin a breach or threatened breach of this Declaration, the Articles and Bylaws of the Association and to enforce, by mandatory injunction or otherwise, the provisions of this Declaration, the Articles and the Bylaws of the Association. 5.06 Conveyance and Acceptance of Permits The Declarant shall assign and transfer to the Association all applicable regulatory permits including stormwater retention and all modifications thereto, including all duties and responsibilities thereunder. The Association by and through the Members shall be obligated to accept transfer of the permit and such rights, duties and obligations. ARTICLE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 6.01 By Declarant Until the earlier of the date which (a) Declarant no longer owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or Additional Property and (b) Declarant records an instrument in the New Hanover County Registry relinquishing such rights, Declarant hereby reserves for itself, its successors and assigns, the right to review and approve, in its absolute discretion, all plans and specifications proposed by any Owner for the construction of any Building, Structure, improvement, fixture, landscaping or appurtenance which shall be placed upon Futch Creek Commercial Park. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Declarant further reserves the right to assign its right of review and approval to an Architectural Review Committee appointed by the Board, provided at all times during a period of such assignment Declarant shall maintain the right to overrule the decisions of the Architectural Review Committee, in its discretion. Notwithstanding anything contained within this Declaration to the contrary, Declarant shall not be limited by any requirements of the Board, the Architectural Review Committee or the Design Guidelines, with respect to any Lot(s) or Common Area owned by Declarant, and Declarant shall be free to construct upon the same any and all Buildings, Structures, improvement, fixture, landscaping or appurtenances which it deems acceptable, in its sole discretion. 6.02 By Architectural Review Committee Upon delegation by Declarant or upon such time as Declarant no longer owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or Additional Property, the Association, acting through the Board, shall appoint an Architectural Review Committee which shall assume jurisdiction over architectural matters. The Architectural Review Committee, when appointed, shall have no fewer than three (3) and no greater than five (5) members, and shall be appointed (and removed, as necessary or desirable) by the Board. Members of the Architectural Review Committee need not be Owners or Members of the Association, and shall be compensated in an amount and in such manner as decided by the Board. 108412.3 10 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -10 6.03 Procedures. Except as expressly allowed in this Declaration, no activities relating to the construction of any Building, Structure, improvement, fixture, landscaping or appurtenance upon any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park (including any Lot)) shall commence until an application for approval of plans and specifications has been submitted to the Board, which shall then promptly deliver the application to Declarant and /or the Architectural Review Committee, and approval is delivered in accordance with this section. The application shall include plans and specifications showing site layout, structural design, elevations and materials /design of the exterior, landscaping plans, drainage, lighting and other features of the proposed design and construction, as may be applicable, and the applicant shall further be required to deliver any additional items and information reasonably requested by Declarant and /or the Architectural Review Committee, as applicable. The approval of such plans and specifications shall be based upon the following standards: adequacy of site dimensions; conformity and harmony of design and building materials with other Buildings, Structures and improvements on Futch Creek Commercial Park and with the entire Futch Creek Village community; the effect of the location and use of the proposed improvements upon other Buildings, Structures and improvements on Futch Creek Commercial Park, and the operations and uses thereof or conducted thereon; adequacy of screening of electric, telephone and gas meters, panels and troughs; relation to topography, grade and finished ground elevation of the Lot being improved to that of neighboring Lots; proper orientation of main elevations with respect to nearby streets; conformity of the plans to the purpose and general plan and intent of this Declaration; any specific Design Guidelines; and such other criteria as the Architectural Review Committee may reasonably deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the general plan and intent of this Declaration. The Architectural Review Committee in its sole and uncontrolled discretion may withhold its approval of such Plans for any reason (including, without limitation, aesthetics). Approval and /or comments and requests for changes or further information shall be delivered to the applicant by the Board (which shall pass such information on from Declarant or the Architectural Review Committee, as applicable) within forty -five (45) days of receipt by the Board of the application. Any responses and redesigns necessary after initial review and comment by Declarant and/or the Architectural Review Committee shall be due from the applicant within seven (7) days of delivery by the Board, and the review and approval process shall continue under the same structure until final approval (or withdrawal by the applicant) is reached. Final approval of an application is valid for a period of three hundred sixty -five (365) days, after which if initial construction has not commenced such approval is deemed null and void. Failure of the Board to deliver a response from the Declarant or Architectural Review Committee as required hereby shall be deemed approval of the application, provided that Declarant, during any period in which it owns any portion of the Property or Additional Property, shall maintain the right to veto any such approval (whether provided by default or otherwise) and deliver written notice of the same directly to the applicant prior to commencement of construction. Such veto by Declarant shall be final. 6.04 Design Guidelines At the election of Declarant, during such time as Declarant owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or Additional Property, and thereafter at the discretion of the Board, Design Guidelines may be created to provide Owners with guidance regarding what general requirements the Declarant and /or Architectural Review Committee will be looking for during review of proposals from Owners. The Design Guidelines may include guidelines and standards for design, construction, operation, use, appearance and such other requirements as set forth in Article 6, of all Buildings, Structures, landscaping and other improvements erected or to be erected, from time to time, on any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park (together with all alterations, modifications, additions, deletions thereto). The Design Guidelines are not the exclusive basis for decisions of the Architectural Review Committee and compliance with the Design 108412.3 11 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -11 Guidelines does not guarantee approval of any application. If prepared, Design Guidelines will be made available to Owners and prospective owners for review prior to submission of a proposal for approval. Any amendments to the Design Guidelines shall be prospective only and shall not apply to require modifications to or removal of structures previously approved once the approved construction or modification has commenced. There shall be no limitation on the scope of amendments to the Design Guidelines, and such amendments may remove requirements previously imposed or otherwise make the Design Guidelines less restrictive. 6.05 Limitation of Liability The Association, the Members of the Association, the Architectural Review Committee, the Declarant and their respective employees or agents shall not be liable in damages to anyone submitting plans for approval or to anyone affected by this Declaration in connection with the exercise of the rights or duties under this Article or by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the approval or disapproval of the Plans. All persons who submit plans or specifications to the Architectural Review Committee for approval agree, by the submission of same, and every Owner of any Lot agrees, by acquiring title thereto or an interest therein, that he will not bring any action or suit against the Association, the Members of the Association, the Architectural Review Committee, the Declarant or their respective employees or agents to recover damages arising from or in any way connected with this Declaration or the approval or failure to approve any Plans submitted. In regard to any Plans approved by the Architectural Review Committee, neither the Declarant, nor the Association, nor any member of the Architectural Review Committee, nor any Member of the Association, shall be responsible or liable in any way for (i) any defects in any Plans, (ii) any structural defects in any work done according to such Plans, or (iii) the failure of the Plans to comply with any law, rule, regulation or code. 6.06 Enforcement. (a) Any structure or improvement placed or made in violation of this Article or the Design Guidelines shall be deemed to be nonconforming. Upon written request from the Board or the Declarant, Owners shall, at their own cost and expense, remove such structure or improvement and restore the land to substantially the same condition as existed prior to the nonconforming work. Should an Owner fail to remove and restore as required, then Declarant, the Board, and the Association shall each have the right to enter the property, remove the violation, and restore the property to substantially the same condition as previously existed. All costs, together with the interest at the maximum rate then allowed by law, may be assessed against the Lot's Owner and the benefited Lot and collected as a Specific Assessment pursuant to Article 16. In the event the Declarant, the Board and /or the Association exercises any right provided herein, then Declarant, the Board and /or the Association (as the case may be) shall be entitled to collect from the relevant Owner, in addition to a reimbursement of all costs expended in the removal of the violation and /or the restoration of the property, an administrative fee for such work, which fee shall be equal to twenty percent (20 %) of the costs incurred by such party in performing the work. (b) The Association shall have the authority to establish and levy fines for violations of this Article and the Design Guidelines, including fines for continuing violations thereof. The fine amounts may be deducted from any bond posted. If the fines are not paid, the Association may levy a Specific Assessment in accordance with the provisions of Article 16. (c) In addition to the foregoing, the Association shall have the authority and standing to pursue all legal and equitable remedies available to enforce the provisions of this Article and the decisions of the Architectural Review Committee. 108412.3 12 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -12 (d) The terms and conditions of this Section 6.09 shall not apply to Declarant or any affiliate of Declarant or to any property within Futch Creek Village owned by Declarant or any affiliate of Declarant. 6.07 Variance The Architectural Review Committee shall have the right to approve a variance from the Restrictions resulting from an inadvertent error in surveying of lot lines, or unintentional mislocation of improvements on a Lot, at the sole reasonable judgment of Architectural Review Committee, provided approval of such variance does not violate the spirit or the intent of the Restrictions. In addition, the Architectural Review Committee may authorize in its discretion reasonable variances or adjustments from compliance with the Restrictions in order to alleviate unusual practical difficulties and hardship in their enforcement and operation. Such variances may only be granted, however, when unique circumstances dictate and no such variance shall (a) be effective unless in writing; or (b) prevent the Architectural Review Committee from denying a variance in other different or even identical circumstances. Any such variances shall not violate the spirit or the intent of the Governing Documents. ARTICLE 7 EZDZ REQUIREMENTS Futch Creek Commercial Park has been zoned under New Hanover County's Exceptional Design Zoning District ( "EZDZ ") and to that end, the following requirements apply: 7.01 Wetland and Water Body Conservation and Preservation No construction or excavation shall take place within one hundred feet (100 ") of a jurisdictional wetland. 7.02 Stormwater Run Off Rules (a) Futch Creek Commercial Property is subject to the State of North Carolina rules and regulations concerning stormwater runoff as these rules and regulations may be amended from time to time. Futch Creek Commercial Property is subject to the terms and conditions of the Declaration of Easements for Tracts 1 and 2, Futch Creek Village which is recorded in Book 5223, Page 1368 of the New Hanover County Registry, which Declaration includes the relevant stormwater restrictions from the applicable stormwater permit. (b) Futch Creek Commercial Property is also subject to the New Hanover County — City of Wilmington Joint Low Impact Development Manual (the "Manual ") and all Owners are responsible for ensuring that their Lot meets all standards for the Lot to qualified as a Low Impact Development, as said term is defined in the Manual. (c) Without limiting the foregoing, Declarant or its designee, including the Architectural Review Committee, reserves the right to impose additional restrictions upon Futch Creek Commercial Park as to the extent required by the terms of the stormwater permit for Futch Creek Commercial Park issued by the State of North Carolina or the Manual. Such additional restrictions may be imposed by Declarant by the recording of a Supplemental Declaration, and no joinder or consent of the Association or any other owner or person shall be required on such Supplemental Declaration. 108412.3 13 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -13 7.03 Minimum Building _ Energy Efficiency All Buildings within Futch Creek Commercial Property must be on average 10% better than ANSI /ASFIRAE /IESNA Standard 90.1 -2007. 7.04 Open Space. Not less than twenty -five percent (25 %) of any Lot shall be devoted to Open Space unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Review Committee. As used herein, "Open Space" shall mean an area of land set aside, dedicated or reserved for public or private use or enjoyment that shall be functional for uses including but not limited to: an area of environmental preservation and enhancement, park, internal courtyard, plaza, playground, playfied, atrium or greenway pedestrian and non - motorized vehicle easement. Open Space may include sodded lawns, decorative planting, wooded areas, landscaping areas covering structures that are not protruding more than ten (10) feet above ground level, sidewalks and walkways, active and passive recreational areas, and water surfaces. It shall not include the use of hydromulch, seed or straw, nor shall it include parking lots or other vehicular surfaces or accessory Buildings. The configurations and specifications of Open Space on any Lot shall be subject to approval by the Architectural Review Committee pursuant to Article 6. 7.05 Water Efficient Landscaping. Each Lot Owner shall reduce potable water consumption for outdoor landscape irrigation by limiting turf to 25% or less on each Lot. Each Lot Owner is required to incorporate rainwater catchment system(s) such as rain barrels or cisterns into their Building. The configurations and specifications of such turf and rainwater catchment systems shall be subject to approval by the Architectural Review Committee pursuant to Article 6. ARTICLE 8 PARKING AND LOADING 8.01 Parkin . No parking of automobiles, trucks, or other vehicles will be permitted on any public or private streets in Futch Creek Commercial Park, except in designated parking areas, and it will be the responsibility of each Owner to provide at all times sufficient parking and loading facilities on its Lot at least to the minimum standards set forth herein, and each Owner shall be responsible for compliance with the provisions of this Section by its employees, customers, visitors, invitees, tenants, and motor carriers serving the Lot. Each Owner shall keep available and maintain on its Lot paved areas, or land for future paved areas, at least as set forth below in this Article 8. 8.02 Easement over Parking Surfaces. Declarant reserves for itself and hereby grants to the Association and each Owner within Futch Creek Commercial Park a perpetual, mutual, reciprocal and non - exclusive easement of passage and use, both vehicular and pedestrian, over, across and through any and all parking surfaces which are located on any Owner's Lot or anywhere in Futch Creek Commercial Park. Each Owner, by acceptance of a deed to its Lot, acknowledges and agrees that, other than handicap parking spaces required by law and loading docks or any other spaces approved by the Architectural Review Committee, no parking surfaces which are located on any Owner's Lot may be reserved or dedicated for a specific purpose or persons, but that all parking surfaces shall remain open for the general use of the public. 8.03 Parking Areas. Parking areas shall be as approved by the Architectural Review Committee (and must comply with the requirements of New Hanover County ordinances and regulations). If parking requirements increase as a result of a change in use or number of employees, additional off- street parking shall be provided by Owner to satisfy the intent of this section. All parking facilities and private drives must be approved by the Architectural Review Committee. In addition, there shall 108412.3 14 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -14 be no parking within the entrances, exits and driveways of or on a Lot. 8.04 Pa vin . Subject to the provisions of Article 3, each Owner shall be responsible for paving of any portion of any Lot used for driveways, parking areas and loading areas, which areas shall be paved with a dust -free, all - weather surface and shall be kept in a good condition and state of repair as approved by the Board and in accordance with the Community Wide Standard. To ensure continuity and to protect property values, Declarant may from time to time and in its sole discretion, require that all paving be performed by the same company or provider on all Common Areas and all Lots, as further described in Section 3.03 herein. ARTICLE 9 LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS 9.01 Landscaping Plans. lans. All Lots upon which a Building is constructed shall be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with (i) applicable New Hanover County ordinances and regulations and (ii) the plans approved by the Architectural Review Committee pursuant to Article 6 hereof. Landscaping shall conform to a landscaping plan approved by the Architectural Review Committee. 9.02 Maintenance of Landscaping; Sprinklers. In accordance with and subject to the provisions of Section 3.03, each Lot Owner shall be responsible for maintaining the Open Space and other landscaping on each Lot in a neat and adequate manner, which shall include the mowing of lawns, trimming of hedges, and removal of weeds from planted areas on the Owner's Lot in accordance with the Community -Wide Standard.. Maintenance of the Open Space and other landscaping on each Lot shall include remulching, replacement of all plant material included in the approved landscaping plan. Each Owner shall be responsible for the costs of such landscaping for each Lot. A sprinkler system and adequate watering shall be required for all landscaped areas (except those which have been left in a natural state) and shall be provided by each Owner for his or her Lot. The costs for repairs to the master irrigation pump shall be a Master Common Expense. Declarant and /or Association reserve the right to require the use of reuse water for irrigation from reuse water ponds and the corresponding right to prohibit the use of individual wells. 9.03 Association's Right to Maintain Lots, Landscaping and Buildings. In the event any Owner, tenant or occupant does not comply with its maintenance and repair obligations in the Declaration within ten (10) days after written notice by the Association, the Association and its representatives or employees shall have the right to enter on such Lot and perform the work specified in such notice and the Owner, tenant or occupant, each having liability therefor, shall pay the cost thereof within thirty (30) days following demand. If the cost of such work is not paid after such demand is made therefor upon such Owner, tenant or occupant, it shall become a lien on such Lot as a Specific Assessment. In addition, the Owner, tenant or occupant shall be deemed to have contracted with the Association for that work and the Association shall be entitled to file and enforce a mechanic's lien against the interest of the Owner, tenant or occupant for the cost of that work and to recover the cost of that work and any other allowable fees or expenses in accordance with North Carolina mechanic's lien law. ARTICLE 10 SIGNS All signs, temporary or permanent, must be approved by the Declarant or the Architectural 108412.3 15 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -15 Review Committee in writing prior to order, purchase or installation. The Declarant or the Architectural Review Committee may impose size and other limitations. Subject to approval by the Architectural Review Committee, one (1) temporary sign may be erected on a Lot prior to and during construction of any Buildings or Structures thereon. After construction is substantially complete, such temporary signs shall be promptly removed and may be replaced with an appropriate permanent building identification signage as approved in writing by the Architectural Review Committee. Each building identification sign will be constructed of standard materials prescribed by the Architectural Review Committee. Unless the prior written approval of the Architectural Review Committee is obtained, no building identification sign shall be attached to any Structure or Building located upon a Lot. Any and all signs in Futch Creek Commercial Park must comply with all applicable requirements and ordinances of New Hanover County. The covenants in this Article shall not apply to signs erected by the Declarant, including without limitation, signs used to identify and advertise Futch Creek Village in part or as a whole. Declarant or Committee retains the right to modify this restriction, including the right to disallow signs altogether or to require that all signs must be of similar size and color. The Declarant and /or the Association, acting through the Committee, shall have the right to enter upon Futch Creek Commercial Park and any Lot or Building located thereon and remove any unapproved or unauthorized sign. ARTICLE 11 PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES 11.01 Nonresidential Purposes Lots that are subjected to this Declaration are hereby restricted exclusively to nonresidential purposes; provided, however, this covenant shall not apply to hotels, motels, or similar temporary stay facilities of a commercial nature. This Declaration specifically provides that the North Carolina Planned Community Act (N.C.G.S. §47 -F) does not apply to Futch Creek Commercial Park. 11.02 General Restrictions Futch Creek Commercial Park shall be used only for those purposes as permitted in this Declaration and in the zoning ordinances of County of New Hanover in force and effect on the date of this Declaration (as the same may hereafter from time to time be amended). The Declarant reserves the right, however, further to limit or restrict the use of a particular Lot or Lots under the provisions noted throughout these Restrictions. No use will be made of any Lot or any portion thereof or any Building or Structure thereon at any time, nor shall any materials or products be manufactured, processed or stored thereon or therein, which shall in the opinion of the Association and /or the Architectural Review Committee cause an undue fire or health hazard to adjoining properties, detract or hinder the visibility of adjoining properties, or constitute a nuisance or cause the emission of noxious odors or gases or smoke, or cause noises or other conditions which might violate the purpose and intent of these Restrictions and development criteria or which shall constitute a violation of any law of the United States, the State of North Carolina and /or County of New Hanover, or any other applicable law, ordinance rule or regulation. No antenna or tower shall be erected within Futch Creek Commercial Park for any purpose without prior written approval from the Declarant, except as otherwise provided by law. Satellite dishes will be allowed as approved by the Architectural Review Committee in its sole discretion. 11.03 Prohibitions No operation or use shall be permitted or maintained which causes or produces any of the following effects discernible outside the improvements or affecting any adjacent property: 108412.3 16 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -16 noise, sound or vibration that is objectionable because of its volume, duration, intermittent beat, frequency or shrillness; smoke; noxious, toxic or corrosive fumes or gases; obnoxious odors; or dust, dirt or fly ash. The following uses are prohibited: agricultural uses, kennels, sanitary services, mini warehouses, adult entertainment establishments, discos, fruit and vegetable stands, funeral homes, stables, dwelling units contained within the principal use of the structure excluding security personnel, all recycling facilities, outdoor bazaars, Christmas tree sales, pumpkin sales, yard sales, evangelistic and religious assemblies not conducted at a church; provided however, as long as a drug store, pharmacy, grocery store or national recognized discount retailer is operating as the primary business on a Lot, such business shall be entitled to conduct seasonal sales of Christmas trees and pumpkins provided such merchandise is located exclusively under the storefront canopy or sidewalk immediately in front of the building located on such Lot. In addition, fruit and vegetable stand sales, Christmas tree sales, and pumpkin sales may be permitted on the Common Area only if (i) offered during an event sponsored by Declarant or (ii) approved in writing by Declarant. The only excavations allowed at Futch Creek Commercial Park shall be those made in connection with construction of an improvement, and then only when proper protection is afforded to adjacent property. Upon completion of such excavations, all exposed openings shall be backfilled and distributed grounds shall be graded, stabilized and restored as close to its original condition as is practicable. 11.04 Exclusive Use Restrictions During the Class B Control Period, Declarant shall have the right from time to time to establish exclusive use restrictions for Futch Creek Commercial Park or portions thereof. The establishment of exclusive use restrictions shall not require the consent of any Members other than Declarant, but shall require the consent of the owner(s) of such described property, if other than Declarant. The establishment of exclusive use restrictions shall be accomplished by filing of record in the Registry an amendment or a supplement to this Declaration (a "Supplemental Declaration "), describing the property to be subject to the exclusive use restrictions. Any such exclusive use restrictions shall be effective upon the filing for record of such Supplemental Declaration unless otherwise provided therein. ARTICLE 12 UTILITY CONNECTIONS All public utility connections and installations of wires and conduits and gas lines or the equivalent to Buildings (except for those servicing temporary construction) shall be made underground from the nearest available power, gas or other services source. Transformers, meters of any type or other apparatus shall be screened and landscaped, and all such installations shall be subject to prior written approval of the Architectural Review Committee pursuant to Article 6 ARTICLE 13 SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 13.01 Approval by Architectural Review Committee Except as provided in Section 13.02 and 13.03 below, no Lot shall be subdivided nor shall any portion be separately sold, leased or rented, nor shall separate Lots be combined, unless and until the plan for such proposed subdivision or separate sale, leasing or renting or combination shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Architectural Review Committee and, if applicable, any governmental authority having jurisdiction thereof. The Architectural Review Committee shall not approve any subdivision or combination which would violate any setback, open space or other requirements of this Declaration or of any 108412.3 17 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -17 applicable governmental entity having jurisdiction thereof. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the approval by the Architectural Review Committee of subdivisions or combinations of property owned by Declarant as provided in Sections 13.02 and 13.03 below shall not be required. 13.02 Subdivision; Combinations by Declarant Any of Futch Creek Commercial Park owned by Declarant may be subdivided by Declarant into individual Lots. Lots owned by Declarant may be combined and /or resubdivided in Declarant's sole discretion and without the need of approval or consent by any party, provided all Lots resulting from such combination and /or resubdivision meet all applicable governmental subdivision rules, regulations and codes. Resubdivision resulting in a violation of setback, open space or other requirements is prohibited. ARTICLE 14 EASEMENTS 14.01 Utilities In addition to easements and rights -of -way in existence at the time of the conveyance by Declarant of any Lot, non - exclusive easements and rights -of -way are reserved in favor of the Declarant and the Association in, over and under a strip of land ten (10) feet in width along all rear and side parcel lines for utility easements to be utilized by the Declarant and the Association for the installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of such utilities (including, without limitation, electricity, gas, telephone, cable TV, water, irrigation, sewer and drainage) as may be necessary, appropriate or desirable for other development of Futch Creek Commercial Park and the servicing of Lots within Futch Creek Commercial Park. The execution of formal easements, as and when such utility easements shall be deemed by the Association to be appropriate, shall be entirely at the discretion of the Association, and the Association shall have the right to execute any such easement agreements without the joint execution or the consent of the Owner of any Lot affected. For such purposes, the non - exclusive use of all or any part of such easements and rights -of -way may be granted or conveyed by the Association to any person, firm, governmental unit or agency or corporation furnishing any such services. In the event that (i) an Owner shall be the Owner of the adjoining Lots or (ii) a subdivision or combination of an Owner's Lot(s) has been effected in accordance with Article 13, such Owner shall have the right, at its sole cost and expense, to relocate the easements reserved under this paragraph to another location upon such Owner's Lot(s), provided that (i) such relocated easement provides substantially the same services as the original easement and (ii) utility services to other portions of Futch Creek Commercial Park are not interrupted. The Association shall, upon satisfaction of the conditions and requirements set forth in the preceding sentence, execute such instruments of documents that may be necessary or desirable to relocate such utility easements at the Owner's expense. Nothing contained in this Section 14.01 shall place any obligation upon the Association for the installation, maintenance, repair or replacement of utilities within the easement areas reserved under this Section unless the Association expressly assumes such obligation following approval of the Members at a meeting duly called subject to the voting and quorum requirements set forth in the Bylaws. 14.02 Easement over Roads, Sidewalks, Parking Surfaces, etc. Declarant reserves for itself and hereby grants to the Association and each Owner within Futch Creek Commercial Park, and all of their successors and assigns, a perpetual, mutual, reciprocal and non - exclusive easement of passage and use, both vehicular and pedestrian, over, across and through any and all sidewalks, streets, roads, access areas, recreational pathways, and parking surfaces which are located on any Owner's Lot or anywhere within Futch Creek Commercial Park. 108412.3 18 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -18 14.03 Recreational Pathways Easement Areas The Declarant may, at its option, establish easements across any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park for recreational pathways (the areas so devoted to such recreational pathways easements being referred to herein as the "Recreational Pathways Easement Areas "). If recreational pathways are constructed on any Lot, Declarant agrees to use good faith efforts, to the extent practicable, to locate the Recreational Pathways Easement Areas in the vicinity of the edges of such Lot or in areas which do not materially impair the use or value of the Lot. The Declarant and all other Owners hereby grant and convey to the Association, its successors and assigns, permanent nonexclusive easements and rights of way over and under the Recreational Pathways Easement Areas for the purposes of (i) the use of the Recreational Pathways Easement Areas for pedestrian traffic within Futch Creek Commercial Park, (ii) maintaining, repairing, replacing and improving the recreational pathways located from time to time within the Recreational Pathways Easement Areas, and (iii) performing any obligations of the Association with respect to the Common Areas as are specified in Article 5 of this Declaration. 14.04 Entrance Sign and Fencing Easement Areas The Declarant has established, pursuant to the Declaration of Easements recorded in Book 5223, Page 1368 of the New Hanover County Registry, and at its option, may establish additional easements for entrance signs for Futch Creek Village and fencing (the "Entrance Sign Easement and Fencing Areas "). The Declarant and all other Owners hereby grant and convey to the Association, its successors and assigns, permanent nonexclusive easements and rights of way over and under any Entrance Sign Easement and Fencing Areas for the purpose of (i) the use of the Entrance Sign Easement and Fencing Areas as part of the Common Areas for the placement of such signs and fences therein as may be approved by the Architectural Review Committee from time to time, (ii) constructing, maintaining, repairing, replacing and improving signs and fences within the Entrance Sign Easement and Fencing Areas, and (iii) performing any obligations of the Association with respect to the Common Areas as are specified in Article 5 of this Declaration. 14.05 Easements of Encroachment Declarant grants reciprocal appurtenant easements of encroachment, and for maintenance and use of any permitted encroachment, between each Lot and any adjacent Common Area and between adjacent Lots due to the unintentional placement or settling or shifting of the improvements constructed, reconstructed, or altered thereon (in accordance with the terms of these restrictions) to a distance of not more than three feet, as measured from any point on the common boundary along a line perpendicular to such boundary. However, in no event shall an easement for encroachment exist if such encroachment occurred due to willful and knowing conduct on the part of, or with the knowledge and consent of, the Person claiming the benefit of such easement. 14.06 Changes Declarant hereby reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to change, alter, designate or redesignate streets, utility and drainage facilities and easements, and to change, alter, designate and /or redesignate such other present and proposed amenities and facilities as may, in the sole judgment of Declarant, be necessary or desirable within Futch Creek Commercial Park and /or Additional Property, except that Developer shall have no right to change, alter or redesignate the character or the use of any Lots not owned by Declarant. 14.07 Services An easement is hereby granted to all police, fire protection, ambulance and all similar persons, companies or agencies performing emergency services to enter upon the Lots and Common Areas in the performance of their duties. Also, an easement is hereby established over all Lots and Common Areas for the benefit of applicable governmental agencies for the setting, 108412.3 19 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -19 removing, and reading of water meters, maintaining and replacing water, drainage and drainage facilities, garbage collection and delivery of mail. 14.08 Easements to Serve Futch Creek Village and Additional Property Declarant hereby reserves for itself and its duly authorized agents, successors, assigns, and mortgagees, an easement over the Common Area for the purposes of enjoyment, use, access, and development of all of Futch Creek Village Additional Property, whether or not such property is made subject to this Declaration. This easement includes, but is not limited to, a right of ingress and egress over the Common Area for construction of roads and for connecting and installing utilities on such property. Declarant further agrees that if the easement is exercised for permanent access to such property and such property or any portion thereof benefiting from such easement is not made sub ect to this Declaration, Declarant and its successors or assigns shall enter into a reasonable agreement with the Association to share the cost of any maintenance which the Association provides to or along any roadway providing access to such property, as well as the costs of any shared easements, common areas, utilities, stormwater drainage facilities and all associated facilities. 14.09 Easements for Maintenance, Emergency, and Enforcement Declarant grants to the Association easements over Futch Creek Commercial Park as necessary to enable the Association to fulfill its maintenance responsibilities under Article 5. The Association shall also have the right, but not the obligation, to enter upon any Lot for emergency, security, and safety reasons, to perform maintenance and to inspect for the purpose of ensuring compliance with and enforce the Governing Documents. The Board and its duly authorized agents and assignees and all emergency personnel in the performance of their duties may exercise such right. Except in an emergency situation, entry shall only be during reasonable hours and after notice to the Owner. 14.10 Easements for Lake and Pond Maintenance and Flood Water Declarant reserves for itself, the Association, and their successors, assigns, and designees, the nonexclusive right and easement, but not the obligation, to enter upon any bodies of water and wetlands located within the Common Area to (a) install, operate, maintain, and replace pumps to supply irrigation water to the Common Area or any other property; (b) construct, maintain, and repair structures and equipment used for retaining water; and (c) maintain such areas in a manner consistent with the Community -Wide Standard. Declarant, the Association, and their successors, assigns and designees shall have an access easement over and across any of Futch Creek Commercial Park which abuts or contains bodies of water or wetlands to the extent reasonably necessary to exercise their rights under this Section. Declarant further reserves for itself, the Association, and their successors, assigns, and designees, a perpetual, nonexclusive right and easement of access and encroachment over the Common Area and Lots (but not the Buildings thereon) adjacent to or within one - hundred (100) feet of bodies of water and wetlands within Futch Creek Commercial Park, in order to (a) temporarily flood and back water upon and maintain water over such portions of Futch Creek Commercial Park; (b) alter in any manner and generally maintain the bodies of water and wetlands within the Common Area; and (c) maintain and landscape the slopes and banks pertaining to such areas. All persons entitled to exercise these easements shall use reasonable care in and repair any damage resulting from the intentional exercise of such easements. Nothing herein shall be construed to make Declarant or any other Person liable for damage resulting from flooding due to hurricanes, heavy rainfall, or other natural occurrences. 108412.3 20 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -20 Declarant further reserves for itself, the Association, and their successors, assigns, and designees, a permanent, exclusive right and easement (a) to pump water, including treated waste water, from the lakes, ponds, lagoons, waterways, basins, water table, wells, water dependant structures and other bodies of water located in, on or under the Common Area for the purpose of irrigating any portion of the same and /or any other property, and (b) to drill, install, locate, maintain and use wells, pumping stations, water towers, filtration basins and tanks and related water facilities and systems within the Common Area. The pumping or other removal of any water from any lake, pond, lagoon or body of water wholly or partly within the Common Area, for any purpose other than fire fighting and as provided herein, is prohibited without express written permission of Declarant and /or the Association. There is hereby reserved for the benefit of the Declarant, the Association, or any public or private utility company or municipality which is providing sewer service to Futch Creek Commercial Park, their affiliates, successors or assigns, a permanent easement and right to discharge waste water into designated lakes, ponds, lagoons, waterways, basins, water dependent structures and other bodies of water within Futch Creek Commercial Park, as approved by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. 14.11 Facilities and Services Open to the Public; Inter - connectivity Disclosure Certain facilities and areas within Futch Creek Village may be open for use and enjoyment of the public. Such facilities and areas may include, by way of example: schools, greenbelts, trails and paths, parks, and other neighborhood spots conducive to gathering and interaction, roads, sidewalks, and medians. Declarant may designate such facilities and areas as open to the public at the time Declarant makes such facilities and areas a part of the Common Area or the Board may so designate at any time thereafter. In addition, governmental authorities may from time to time require that certain roads and /or streets within Futch Creek Village be connected to other public and /or private roads and thoroughfares located upon or serving other subdivisions or communities in the vicinity of Futch Creek Village. By acceptance, occupancy or enjoyment of any property located within Futch Creek Commercial Park, each Owner, on behalf of itself and any parties claiming through said Owner (including, without limitation, tenants, licensees and invitees), hereby (i) acknowledges that such inter - connectivity may increase or otherwise affect the flow of traffic within Futch Creek Village and (ii) waives any claims against Declarant or the Association relating to such inter - connectivity and /or any resulting increase or modification in traffic flow or patterns within Futch Creek Village. 14.12 Governmental Interests Declarant hereby discloses to all Owners and potential owners, tenants, licensees and invitees of property within Futch Creek Village that Declarant reserves the right (but shall have no obligation) to designate property owned by Declarant or any affiliate of Declarant for use and /or ownership by or for the benefit of fire departments, police stations, utility facilities, public schools, parks, streets and /or other public or quasi - public facilities. By acceptance, occupancy or enjoyment of any property located within Futch Creek Village, each Owner, on behalf of itself and any parties claiming through said Owner (including, without limitation, tenants, licensees and invitees), hereby waives any claims against Declarant or the Association relating to any such uses. 108412.3 21 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -21 ARTICLE 15 RESERVED RIGHTS 15.01 Reserved Rights Declarant reserves unto itself, its successors and assigns the following rights: (a) the right to complete improvements indicated on its plats and plans; (b) the right to exercise any development rights (including without limitation the right to annex additional property into Futch Creek Commercial Park and to withdraw property from Futch Creek Commercial Park); (c) the right to maintain sales offices, management offices, signs advertising Futch Creek Commercial Park or any additions thereto or any other property owned and /or developed by Declarant; (d) the right to use easements through the Futch Creek Commercial Park and Common Area for the purpose of making improvements within Futch Creek Commercial Park or within real estate which may be added to Futch Creek Commercial Park; (e) the right to make Futch Creek Commercial Park part of a larger planned community or group of planned communities; (f) the right to subject Futch Creek Commercial Park and or the Association to a master association; (g) the right to appoint or remove any officer, director or executive board member of any property owners' association (including, without limitation, the Association, any sub - association and /or the Residential Association) during the Class B Control Period; and (h) the right to exercise any other rights reserved in this Declaration. ARTICLE 16 ASSESSMENTS 16.01 Assessments Established The Association shall have the right to establish the following: (a) Annual Assessments as provided in Section 16.02 of this Article. (b) Special Assessments as provided in Section 16.03 of this Article. (c) Specific Assessments as provided in Section 16.04 of this Article. All of the foregoing (together with interest at the maximum rate allowed by law, court costs, late charges, charges for reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses of collection) are continuing charges on the land and are secured by a continuing lien upon the Lot against which such assessments are made, as provided in Section 16.07 below. Each assessment (together with interest at the maximum rate allowed by law, court costs, late charges, charges for reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses of collection) is also the personal obligation of the person who was the 108412.3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -22 Owner of such Lot when such assessment became due and is a lien on the Lot, which lien will remain on the Lot even if title to the Lot is transferred to any other person or entity whether or not related to the Owner; provided, however, the personal obligation for delinquent assessments shall not pass to the Owner's successors in title unless expressly assumed by them. Co- owners of a Lot shall be jointly and severally liable for the entire amount of the assessment. 16.02 Annual Assessments The Annual Assessments shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety and welfare of the Owners within Futch Creek Commercial Park, including, without limitation, (i) the operation, management, maintenance, repair, servicing, security, renewals, replacement and improvement of the Common Areas and other responsibilities of the Association set forth in this Declaration, including but not limited to Article 5, (ii) taxes assessed on the Common Areas; (iii) insurance on and with respect to the Common Areas (including liability insurance); and (iv) all other general activities and expenses of the Association in relation to the Common Areas and Common Expenses, including the enforcement of this Declaration. The Annual Assessment shall be utilized for payment of Common Expenses including the following (which list is not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive) : (a) Maintenance repair, replacement and cleanup of Common Areas; (b) street lights and all other utilities in connection with the roads; (c) Common Areas maintenance reserve, including but not limited to reserves for capital repairs and /or replacement; (d) Street and sidewalk snow removal for Common Areas; (e) Liability insurance on Common Areas; (f) Officers' and directors' insurance; (g) Tax preparation; Bookkeeping; Office supplies /check printing; (h) Property taxes on the Common Areas; (i) Maintenance and repair of entrance features, common signs and sign easements designated by Declarant as Common Areas; 0) Maintenance and repair of all elements of stormwater retention facilities serving Futch Creek Commercial Park, wherever such facilities may be located, to ensure compliance with all terms and conditions of stormwater retention permits; (k) Landscaping and irrigation of Common Areas and landscaped areas and islands within right of ways, whether public or private; (1) Maintenance and repair of drainage and utility easements within Common Areas; and (m) Security services for the Master Common Areas as the Board, in its sole discretion, may or may not deem appropriate. 108412.3 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -23 16.03 Special Assessments In addition to the Annual Assessments, the Association may levy a Special Assessment for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any acquisition, construction, reconstruction, renewal, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon the Common Areas and for such other purposes as may be determined from time to time by the Board, provided such assessment first is approved by a vote of a majority of the votes cast at a duly called meeting of the Association, subject to the quorum requirements established by Article 4, and subject to the requirement that written notice of the meeting and of the proposed action is sent to Members of the Association at least ten (10) days prior to such meeting but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such meeting. Any such Special Assessment may be payable in one or more installments with or without interest as the Board determines. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Declaration, the Board may, at any time and from time to time, levy a Special Assessment should the Board determine that there shall be a deficit in its receipts versus its expenditures for any fiscal year of the Association. The purpose of such Special Assessment shall be to defray any such deficit. Approval is required of the levy of this Special Assessment by a simple majority vote of the votes cast at a duly called meeting of the Association for the purpose of acting on such Special Assessment, subject to the quorum requirements established by Article 4 and subject to the requirement that written notice of the meeting and of the proposed action is sent to the Members of the Association at least ten (10) days prior to such meeting, but not more than sixty (60) days prior to such meeting. 16.04 Specific Assessments Any of the following costs and expenses may be assessed by the Association as a "Specific Assessment" against any specific Lot or Lots in the event the Owner (or Owners) of such Lot (or Lots) fails to pay such indebtedness due to the Association within thirty (30) days after written demand therefor: (1) any and all accrued indebtedness of any Owner to the Association arising under any provision of this Declaration, arising by contract (express or implied), or arising because of any act or omission of any Owner or person for whose conduct such Owner is legally responsible or to cover the costs incurred in bringing a Lot into compliance with this Declaration , the Articles, the Bylaws or the Rules and Regulations of the Association; (2) any common expense or portion thereof benefiting fewer than all of the Lots; and /or (3) any costs incurred by the Association to bring the relevant Lot(s) or Common Areas into compliance with the terms of these Restrictions, the Articles, Bylaws or Rules and Regulations caused by the failure of Owner, or the Owner's agents, lessees, guests, or invitees, to comply with such provisions (including, without limitation, any acts of negligence or misconduct). In the event any Owner fails to perform any obligation required herein, the Association may perform such obligation on the Owner's behalf, assess a fine for such failure to comply, and levy the cost of such performance or remedy against the Owner and the Owner's Lot(s) as a Specific Assessment hereunder. 16.05 Amount; Due Dates The assessment period shall be the fiscal year. The amount of the Annual Assessments, as determined in accordance with the procedure described herein and with a budget prepared according to the criteria contained in Section 16.02, shall be fixed by the Board on or before November 30 of each calendar year; provided, however, that the amount of Annual Assessments for the first fiscal year shall be fixed by the Board within sixty (60) days following the recording of this Declaration. Written notice of the assessment shall be given each Owner. The Board shall establish the due dates in its discretion. The Annual Assessments shall be paid at least annually, although the Board may require them to be paid in more frequent installments. 108412.3 3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -24 As to each Lot (but subject to Section 16.04 above), the amount of each assessment shall be determined as follows: the total Annual Assessment amount (and any Special Assessment amounts) for Futch Creek Commercial Park as described above shall be allocated among the Lots by multiplying the Master Annual Assessment amount by a fraction having as its numerator a number equal to the total acreage of such Lot and as its denominator a number equal to the total acreage of all Lots within Futch Creek Commercial Park. 16.06 Commencement. The assessments provided by this Article will commence as to each Lot on the date such Lot is annexed into Futch Creek Commercial Park and made subject to this Declaration (which annexation shall be evidenced by a recorded instrument in the New Hanover County Registry as more particularly described in Article 19) and shall be prorated based upon the number of calendar months, or portion thereof, remaining in the fiscal year in which the annexation occurs. 16.07 Assessment Lien. All sums assessed to any Lot (together with interest at the maximum rate allowed by law, court costs, late charges, charges for reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses of collection) are secured by a continuing lien on such Lot in favor of the Association. Such lien is subject and inferior to the lien of any Mortgage encumbering such Lot as provided in Section 16. 10, below; but all other lienors acquiring liens on any Lot after the Declaration is recorded are deemed to consent that such liens are inferior to the lien established by this Declaration whether or not such consent is set forth in the instrument creating such lien. The recording of this Declaration constitutes constructive notice to all subsequent purchasers and creditors, or either, of the existence of the Association's lien and its priority. The Association from time to time may, but is not required to do so, record a notice of lien against any Lot to further evidence the lien established by this Declaration. 16.08 Association Remedies. Any assessment or portion thereof not paid within ten (10) days after its due date is deemed to be delinquent and shall bear interest at the lesser of (i) the rate of eighteen percent (18 %) per annum or (ii) the highest rate permitted by applicable law from the date of such default. The Association shall be entitled to enforce all remedies of the Association provided herein for delinquent assessments if such delinquency continues for thirty (30) days following written demand by the Association to cure such delinquency. Upon an Owner's failure to pay any installment of an assessment for which installment payments are permitted, the Association may declare the whole assessment immediately due and payable upon ninety (90) days notice as aforesaid. The Association may sue the Owner personally obligated to pay such assessment for a money judgment and /or may foreclose its lien against the Lot. A suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid assessments may be maintained without foreclosing, waiving, or otherwise impairing the security of the Association's lien or its priority. No Owner may waive or escape liability for the Association's assessment by nonuse of the Common Areas or by abandonment of such Owner's Lot. 16.09 Foreclosure. The lien for sums assessed pursuant to this Article shall be deemed a mortgage for the purposes of, and may be foreclosed by appropriate action in accordance with Article 29A of Chapter 1 of the North Carolina General Statutes, or may be foreclosed in any other manner permitted by law. In any such foreclosure, the Owner is required to pay all costs and expenses of foreclosure, including reasonable attorneys' fees. All such costs and expenses are secured by the lien foreclosed. Such Owner also is required to pay the Association all assessments against the Lot that become due during the period of foreclosure, which also are secured by the lien foreclosed and will be accounted and paid as of the date the Owner's title is divested by foreclosure. The Association has the right and power to bid at the foreclosure or other legal sale to acquire the Lot foreclosed, or to 108412.3 4 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -25 acquire such Lot by deed or other proceeding in lieu of foreclosure, and thereafter to hold, convey, lease, rent, use and otherwise deal with such Lot as its owner. If any foreclosure sale results in a deficiency, the Owner shall remain liable therefor. The Association may not own or otherwise acquire Lots except pursuant to foreclosure of the Association's lien or pursuant to a deed in lieu of foreclosure of the Association's lien. 16.10 Subordination of Liens The lien provided for herein in connection with a given Lot or Lots shall be subordinate to the lien of any Mortgage that is of record as an encumbrance against such Lot or Lots. The sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to a judicial foreclosure or foreclosure by power of sale of a Mortgage encumbering any Lot shall extinguish any subsequent assessment lien which has attached and become effective with regard to the Lot being so transferred, and shall prohibit the creation of any lien against such Lot on account of expenditures which became due prior to the date of such sale or transfer; provided, however, that there shall be a lien on the interests of the purchaser at such sale which shall attach, be created and become effective, and be foreclosed in accordance with this Declaration and which shall secure all assessments becoming due after the date of any such sale or transfer. For the purposes of this section, a sale or transfer of a Lot shall be deemed to occur on the date of recordation of a deed or other instrument of title evidencing the conveyance of record title to the Lot. 16.11 Exemption of Declarant Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Declaration, Declarant shall be exempt from the payment of Assessments for any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park owned by Declarant. 16.12 Working Capital At the time title to a Lot is conveyed to an Owner by Declarant and in every transaction thereafter involving the sale of the Lot, each new Owner shall contribute to the Association as working capital an amount to be designated by the Declarant (such amount not to exceed the amount of the total Master Annual and Village Annual Assessments due relative to such Lot during the calendar year of such conveyance). Such funds shall be used for operating and capital expenses of the Association such as prepaid insurance, supplies and the expenses of maintaining the Common Areas as provided herein. Amounts paid into the working capital fund are not to be considered as an advance payment of the Annual Assessments. All working capital funds shall become a part of the general operating and revenue funds of the Association. ARTICLE 17 ASSIGNABILITY OF DECLARANT'S RIGHTS AND DUTIES Declarant may assign any or all of its rights, powers and reservations as Declarant hereunder to any person or entity which owns or controls a substantial part of Futch Creek Commercial Park or in connection with a sale or transfer by Declarant to any person or entity of substantially all of Declarant's remaining Property. Where such person or entity evidences its consent in writing to accept such assignments and assume such duties, he, she or it shall, to the extent of such assignment, have the same rights and powers and be subject to the same obligations and duties as are imposed upon Declarant hereunder and Declarant shall be relieved thereof. The term "Declarant" as used herein includes all such assignees and their heirs, successors and assigns. ARTICLE 18 ENFORCEMENT AND DURATION 108412.3 5 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -26 18.01 Covenants Running With Land The conditions, covenants, restrictions and reservations herein contained shall run with the land, and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Declarant, the Association and the now and future Owners of every part of the lands now or hereafter covered by the provisions hereof; shall create mutual, equitable servitudes upon each Lot in favor of every other such Lot; and shall create reciprocal rights and obligations between and among Declarant, the Association and the respective Owners and tenants of all Lots and privity of contract and estate between Declarant, the Association and all Owners of said Lots, their heirs, successors and assigns; provided, however, only the Declarant or its assignees shall have the right to exercise the discretionary powers herein reserved to the Declarant. 18.02 Enforcement These Restrictions may be enforced as herein provided by Declarant, the Association, any Owner, or any tenant with approval of the Owner of the Lot of which the tenant occupies in whole or in part, and violation of any condition, covenant, restriction or reservation herein contained shall give to Declarant, the Association, and to the Owners or any of them, the right to bring proceedings at law or in equity against the party or parties violating or attempting to violate any of said Restrictions, to enjoin them from so doing, to cause such violation to be remedied, or to recover damages resulting from any such violation. Every act, omission to act, or condition which violates these Restrictions shall constitute a nuisance and every remedy available at law or in equity for the abatement of public or private nuisances shall be available to the Declarant, the Association and the Owners. In any legal or equitable proceeding to enforce the provisions hereof or to enjoin their violation, the party or parties against whom judgment is entered shall pay the reasonable attorneys' fees of the party or parties for whom judgment is entered in such amount as may be fixed by court in such proceeding. Such remedies shall be cumulative and not exclusive. The Association shall have the right to remedy any violation of this Declaration and the Bylaws and assess the costs of remedying same against the offending Owner as a Specific Assessment. For any violation by an Owner (including, but not limited to, the nonpayment of any Assessments), the Association shall have the right to suspend the offending Owner's voting rights hereunder and the use by such Owner, his agents, lessees, employees, licensees and invitees of the Common Areas in Futch Creek Commercial Park for any period during which a violation continues (except that such penalties may not be for more than sixty (60) days for violation of any of the Association's published Rules and Regulations). The Association may establish a schedule of fines for the violation of this Declaration, the Articles, Bylaws and Rules and Regulations. The remedies provided by this Section are cumulative, and are in addition to any other remedies provided by law. 18.03 Priority. All Restrictions and other provisions, except for liens for assessment, herein contained shall be deemed prior and superior to all Mortgages now or hereafter executed upon land subject to this Declaration, and to all leases covering part or all of any Lot; provided, however, the violation of these Restrictions shall not defeat nor render invalid the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value, nor the leasehold estate of any tenant except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in its lease. If any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park is sold under foreclosure of any Mortgage, any purchaser at such sale, and his or her successors and assigns, shall hold any and all of such properties purchased subject to all of the Restrictions and other provisions hereof as fully as if such purchaser were an original party to this Declaration. 18.04 No Waiver The failure of Declarant or any Owner or the Association to take action to enforce the provisions hereof or to enjoin their violation shall in no event be deemed a waiver of its right subsequently to do so, nor shall it be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default or of the continuation of any existing default nor shall such failure give rise to any claim or course of action 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -27 against Declarant, Association or any Owner. 18.05 Duration These Restrictions shall run with and bind the land and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Association, the Declarant and each Owner, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns and parties and all persons claiming under or through Declarant or any Owner for a period of twenty (20) years, at which time the Restrictions shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years; provided, however, that there shall be no renewal or extension of this Declaration if, during the last year of the initial period (or during the last year of any subsequent ten (10) year renewal period), three - fourths (3/4) of the votes at a duly held meeting of the Association are cast in favor of terminating this Declaration at the end of its then current term; provided, however, that so long as Declarant owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or the Additional Property, no such termination shall be effective without the written approval of Declarant. It shall be required that written notice of any meeting at which such a proposal to terminate this Declaration is to be considered, setting forth the fact that such a proposal will be considered, shall be given each Member at least (30) days in advance of said meeting. In the event that the Members vote to terminate this Declaration, the President and Secretary of the Association shall execute a certificate which shall set forth the resolution of termination adopted, the date that notice of such meeting was given, the total number of votes of Members, the total number of votes required to constitute a quorum at a meeting of the Association, the number of votes necessary to adopt a resolution terminating this Declaration, the total number of votes cast in favor of such resolution, and the total number of votes cast against such resolution. Said certificate shall be made of record and may be relied upon for the correctness of the facts contained herein as they relate to the termination of this Declaration. 18.06 Amendments This Declaration may be amended by the members as follows: (a) Amendment By Members The procedure for amendments made by Members shall be as follows: All proposed amendments shall be submitted to a vote of the Members at a duly called meeting of the Association and any such proposed amendment shall be deemed approved if sixty - seven percent (67 %) of the votes cast at such meeting vote in favor of such proposed amendment; provided, however, that so long as Declarant owns any portion of Futch Creek Commercial Park or the Additional Property, then no such amendment shall be effective without the written approval of Declarant. Notice shall be given each Member at least ten (10) days but not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the meeting at which such proposed amendment is to be considered. If any proposed amendment to this Declaration is approved by the Members as set forth above, the President and Secretary of the Association shall execute an addendum to this Declaration which shall set forth the amendment, the effective date of the amendment, the date of the meeting of the Association at which such amendment was adopted, the date that notice of such meeting was given, the total number of votes required to constitute a quorum at a meeting of the Association, the total number of votes necessary to adopt the amendment, the total number of votes cast in favor of such amendment, and the total number of votes cast against the amendment. Such amendment shall be recorded in the Registry. (b) Amendment by Declarant Furthermore, these Covenants may be amended unilaterally by Declarant so long as it owns five (5 %) or more of the Lots, including without limitation, proposed or planned Lots in Futch Creek Commercial Park, exclusive of public rights -of- way, by recording the appropriate document in the Registry, and by giving notice of such change to the then Owners of Lots. No such termination, extension, modification of amendment shall (i) be 108412.3 7 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -28 effective until a proper instrument in writing has been executed, acknowledged, delivered and recorded in the Registry or (ii) affect any plans, specifications or use theretofore approved by Declarant or any improvements theretofore or thereafter made pursuant to such approvals. Retention of this right to amend by Declarant is not intended to affect the general or common scheme of development for Futch Creek Commercial Park, but to correct and /or modify situations or circumstances which may arise during the course of development. (c) Amendments by the Members to this Declaration shall be subject to the following additional limitations: (i) if any provisions of this Declaration expressly prohibit or place limitations upon an amendment to this Declaration, then such provisions shall control over the provisions of this Section 18.07; and (ii) this Declaration may not be amended so as to alter any obligation to pay ad valorem taxes or assessment for public improvements or so as to deprive Declarant, its designee or successors or assigns of any rights granted or reserved unto Declarant without Declarant's written approval. ARTICLE 19 ADDITIONAL PROPERTY AND AMENDMENTS 19.01 Expansion by Declarant During the Class B Control Period, Declarant shall have the right from time to time, without the requirement of any consent of the Members, to annex any or all of the Additional Property into Futch Creek Commercial Park, thereby subjecting such Additional Property to the coverage and operation of this Declaration and the Restrictions herein contained. The Additional Property may be annexed hereto by filing of record in the Registry an amendment or a supplement to this Declaration (a "Supplemental Declaration ") with respect to the Additional Property (or the relevant portion thereof) which shall extend the operation, effect and enforceability of the Restrictions of this Declaration to such Additional Property. The amendment or Supplemental Declaration may contain such complementary additions and modifications of the Restrictions contained in this Declaration as may be necessary or appropriate in the sole judgment of Declarant to reflect the different character, if any, of the Additional Property provided such additions and modifications as are not materially inconsistent with the plan, intent and spirit of this Declaration. Declarant may transfer or assign the rights in this Section 19.01 to any Person who is the developer of at least a portion of the real property described in Exhibit "A" or the Additional Property. Any such transfer shall be memorialized in a written, Recorded instrument executed by Declarant. Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed to require Declarant or any successor to subject the Additional Property to this Declaration or to develop any of the Additional Property in any manner whatsoever. 19.02 Expansion by the Association The Association may also subject additional property to the provisions of this Declaration by Recording a Supplemental Declaration describing the Additional Property. Any such Supplemental Declaration shall require the affirmative vote of Members representing not less than sixty -seven (67 %) of the Class "A" votes of the Association represented at a meeting duly called for such purpose and the consent of the owner of the property. In addition, so long as Declarant owns property subject to this Declaration or which may become subject to this 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -29 Declaration in accordance with Section 19.01, Declarant's consent shall be necessary. The Association's President and Secretary, the owner of the property, and Declarant, if Declarant's consent is necessary, shall sign the Supplemental Declaration. 19.03 Effect of Filing Supplemental Declaration A Supplemental Declaration shall be effective upon Recording unless otherwise specified in such Supplemental Declaration. On the effective date of the Supplemental Declaration, any additional property subjected to this Declaration shall be assigned voting rights in the Association and assessment liability in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. ARTICLE 20 MISCELLANEOUS 20.01 Consent Every person who now or hereafter owns or acquires any rights, title, estate or interest to any portion of the property covered hereby is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every covenant, condition and restriction contained herein, whether or not reference to this Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in said property. 20.02 Paragraph Pleadings Paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to be a part of this Declaration or in any way to define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of the particular paragraph to which they refer. 20.03 Severability If any provision of this Declaration is held to be invalid by any court, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions hereof, and for the purposes hereof all covenants as contained herein shall be deemed to be severable each from the other without qualification. 20.04 Governing This Agreement and the separate provisions thereof shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of North Carolina without regard to principles of conflict of laws. 108412.3 0 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -30 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this Declaration to be executed by its duly authorized officers as of the date first above written. RIDGEWOOD GARDEN HEALTH INVESTORS, L.L.C. B Name: Its: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF (County where acknowledgment taken) I, , a Notary Public for County, North Carolina, do hereby certify that , Manager of Ridgewood Garden Health Investors, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument on behalf of the said company. Witness my hand and official seal this the day of 1 2012. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 108412.3 10 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -11 -31 06. Reports on Community Meetings Summary of the meetings held with surrounding property owners. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -1 .. S �s ,t j PROJECT MEETING NOTES TO File FROM Christopher Boney, AIA DATE December 2, 2011 RE Futch Creek — Rezoning — Neighborhood Meetings CC ATTENDEES 41 attendees for December 1 and 31 attendees for December 2 PROJECT Futch Creek PROJECT No 7106-112570 If there is a discrepancy in the information listed, please contact LS3P within 3 calendar days from receipt. Chris Boney made the presentation to the attendees on behalf of the applicant. The presentation consisted of explanation of EZDZ zoning ordinance. He showed slides of the proposed project with detail on all aspects of the project. There were posters displayed on boards for small discussion groups. On December 1 st, questions were raised and answered concerning the following: 1) Entrance to development 2) Curb Cuts 3) Interconnectivity — Neighbors do not want access to their neighborhood roads from the project. 4) Number of units in the project 5) Stormwater 6) Impervious square footage 7) Size of apartments 8) Buffers 9) Lighting 10) Concerns with traffic from apartments into a single family residential area 1 1) Walkways 12) Project ti mi ng 13) Rental rates 14) Use of commercial property 15) Would like to know of a comparable project 16) Why would the residents want this in their community 17) Questions regarding the satellite annexation 18) Traffic study 19) Traffic effect on Futch Creek Road 20) How much longer w i l l it take the average resident to reach 17 based on the increased traffic. CHARLESTON COLUMBIA GREENVILLE CHARLOTTE RALEIGH WILMINGTON LS3P ASSOCIATES LTD. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 2528 INDEPENDENCE BLVD, SUITE 200 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28412 PH 910.790.9901 FAX910.790.3111 WWW.LS3P.COM Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -2 Page 2 of 3 21) Has there been a market study done to show that this project is in their best i nterest. 22) Some of the residents see no benefit of the project 23) How w i l l water and sewer be handled 24) What schools will service this area? 25) Questions possible decreases in property values 26) Why not develop as a single family neighborhood 27) Who owns the property? What is their experience? 28) Construction noise 29) What is the alternative plan is re- zoning is defeated. Group of neighbors then split into smaller groups 1) Traffic 2) Project design 3) Developer questions Need to qualify number of trips per day. On December 2, questions were raised and answered concerning the following: 1) Will our access to Highway 17 change? 2) How many units will the development consist of? 3) What is the difference? 4) This is not Mayfaire. 5) We are not allowed to have 2 stories in this neighborhood. 6) Can you limit the zoning to office only? (Desired) 7) Can we limit this to medical office? (Desired, not limited) 8) What is the traffic comparison to current zoning? Unknown. 9) Who is the market / tenant? Young professionals. 10) What w i l l the rent per month cost? $900 - $1400 1 1) What is the average trips per day per unit? 3 -4000 trips. 12) What is the total number of vehicles for a 275 sf unit development? 1.6 per unit. 13) Who is the owner? McNeill Family. 14) How does this development encourage pedestrian / bicycle use? 15) Have you submitted to New Hanover County? No. 16) Did you know that the storage facility was denied / rejected? 17) Have you looked at environmental assessment? Yes. 18) Are you filling in the ditch? No. 19) Why can you not develop single family homes? 20) Will you leave the perimeter natural or strip and replant? 21) Can there be any height of buildings in the middle? Zoning limits the height to 4 0' . 22) Will you clear the buffer and replant? No, only what is required for construction. 23) Is there a requirement for keeping the existing trees? 24) How does the house access their property? Easement. 25) The traffic light is a concern. CHARLESTON COLUMBIA GREENVILLE CHARLOTTE RALEIGH WILMINGTON LS3P ASSOCIATES LTD. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 2528 INDEPENDENCE BLVD, SUITE 200 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28412 PH 910.790.9901 FAX910.790.3111 WWW.LS3P.COM Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -3 Page 3 of 3 26) Does this have the possibility of public housing? 27) Could this area be annexed into the City of Wilmington? 28) Would the developer be willing to notify the surrounding communities? 29) Have you done any studies on crime? 30) Would you like this in your neighborhood? 31) What is the economical impact to our property? 32) You should send all of your diagrams out to the property owners. 33) How does this development impact the utilities? 34) Traffic on 40 and south? 35) People will cut through Sagewood? 36) Will this impact the sewer? CHARLESTON COLUMBIA GREENVILLE CHARLOTTE RALEIGH WILMINGTON LS3P ASSOCIATES LTD. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE 2528 INDEPENDENCE BLVD, SUITE 200 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28412 PH 910.790.9901 FAX910.790.3111 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -4 PLANNING WWW.LS3P.COM Meeting Date: 12 i 1 Time: �•� Ridgewood Gardens Health Investors LLC Informational Meeting Regarding 8704 Market Street, Wilmington, NC PLEASE SIGN IN Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -5 Meetin Date: - Tirne:. � � rh Rid Gardens Health Investors, LLC Informational Meetin Re le 8704 Market Street, Wilmin NC PLEASE SIGN IN Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-12-6 NAME ADDRESS 11.1-1-1111 PHONE NUMBER A # 4bb 2. 1 ,� .Tl�u� % /1��7o�Ul�s gsZ GA.L-P j6A F 9/0 6�646az. L AS E 3. t- � vdh '�orzo lL �3 Ha��mn #CA46 4. , �- �l(1�4�.(Lt 'Y'I Y�o I � �oI L�'3�auG� 9 io � 8� a �5 f 5. �� II �� 30CP (�skiUS W7 Q�l7��9.73�F 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 12. 13. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-12-6 /u•/�f�r(�y A Oh9. goo 3s�8 2. IAOW 5 •�,,. w� (� 1 44ho ayti�r 3. Tf6,S.J IPA. A4+. WlPro# V zaigu Sic�86 °obb� O r - ----------------------- ----- - - - - ---- - 11 6. OxOA l� Qom- �W� ✓-� rJC l0 ..... ....... 11 8. co kt v C4— �y K 9. 10. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -12 -7 2 105653v.3 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-12-8 04116 uica 4' I_ NAME ADDRESS ct PHONE NUMBER 14. L /-j 07 1, 'L 15. 1 16. res 1710, �J e-k) FaP4 q 4 18, i ere4eNcAd 1 9 ge� ALAL) F- 9/o 1-1 - 62-8b 19. gr � A4 E � V � f � � . 20. F21 I Z ZN 41 5 7 22• o tx rj 236 2 105653v.3 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-12-8 NJ - Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-12-9 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8-12-10 Case: Z -919, 06/12 Neighborhood Concerns /Public Comments Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -1 From: O'Keefe, Chris ® Monda June 04,2012 9-643 AM 0 Too 'Dick Chantland' C 0 ce Dreibelbis, Nicole Subject: RE: MY ISSUE Thanks for y our comments Mr. Chantland. We will include 'tffiem in ti le case file. Sincerel Chris O'Keefe Fromm. Dick Chantland Lmailto.-r_ichard33 Sents. Saturda June 02,, 2012 9:31 AM To O'Keefe Chris Subject: MY ISSUE Importance: Hi M issue is re the upcomin zonin hearin 7)for a parcel on upper Market St next to Futch Creek ro&*_ And adjoinin Plantation Landin homes. All i i 170 li lip 11 ... . ... .. M `,1"o(.',',ci1 Control Pel To: eokeefe@,�nhc �ovx�om Remove this sender from m allow list From: richard330a .,ec.rr.com i mam, I Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-2 Rr��W m ut" So B Su �on,, R-oview Planner N,f"e,,w CenterSui 1110 Wit � NC 284 03 Docurnerds, Kevleywed 1,., Nbw Ha� nover Cou nA Zonin Ordnance Tin ttoim lunterri,et 6/1,3112), 2., Case. report Z�-9,19,, (OM2) part ofthe June 7,2012 Meetin 3. Ju�neS.20�12WftrftumS.,A.,Bur 6f7M 2 zonin ffteetin This lefter backs up the discussion Larr Mathen y ou and I had from 9-.30 to 10:30 AM toda at y our office. I have attached a table of issues and concerns we discussed. I am of the opinion that the list of concerns makes the applicants, Rid Garden Health Investor, LLC. ( not sure who were dealin with see item #1 proposal non-compliant and section 45, Chan In Kind of Non-Confbrmin Use, pa 34, of the Now Hanover Count Zonin Ordinance, be invoked. These issues/concerns are provided in more detail in the attached table. I onl had a few hours to review the referenced documents. I am sure vifith more time I ma be able to 11denWed more concerns. *verall m g oal is to: 1. Protect the value of m home and nei 2. Re the New Hanover Count Ordinance be applied fairl and 3. An errors that are noted are validated then corrected thru the appropriate process. Ai "M PWIN r"Tml L-11 1 11 0 1 1 1 a T Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-3 Board of Commissioners Meeting , 07/02/2012 8 -13 -4 is R Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-6 0 0 (D (D r 4_0 .49 IV ED • 0 mow 0 0 M 0 E c: 0 0 M a G (a r .2 > L 0 AS E C c L D 13L, a M E tit 0_1 • c CL M > to w co w WOE (D .10-ps I n CD CL 0 c r E > 0 (D s > > E z N : a)z = 0 cl) W Z tu -p Jc Jbd :M M " 0 a OL (D 0 ik 79 C 4) U) a G 0 m CL M *2 z u) (D 0 M, CL cl%l 0 04 W 0 CL x2 CD CD _c W CL, w o CL 0 L _ 0 ' 0 CL 2 40 a, < Q CI- CD now-> AIL 0 2 CL 41P 02 U) M 4b (D CMD S Y) 0 q` 1 0 2 Z ISL r CL 06 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-6 0 0 (D (D r 4_0 .49 c: • 0 mow 0 0 M 0 E c: 0 0 M X: r .2 > L 0 AS E C c U_ 0_1 • c CL M > to w co w WOE (D 3: CL 3p I n CD CL 0 c r E > 0 (D s > > E z N : a)z = 0 cl) W Z L_ r Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-6 0 0 M .2 U_ w co w WOE I n CD CL 0 c >% a)z = 0 cl) W Z Jbd :M M " 0 (D 4) U) *2 z u) (D 0 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-6 R Mr. Sam Bur Subdivision Review Planne New Hanover Count Plannin and lnspection,, 230 Government Drive,, Suite 110 Wilmin NC 28403 A ,rte : Rezonin Re - Z-919 U f =I In review-In documentation from the developer for the above referenced rezonin it has come to m attention that there ma be some misunderstandin of how desi wetlands 'tre be protected per the EDZD Ordinance. 1 711 F 7 M W11L&,11111 AL 'AM The attached items (3) indicate how the proposed development encroaches on the existin,, wetlands. "'1110 RAL, Attachments (3) cc: Mr. James Eldrid Attorne at Law Board of Commissioners Meetin-' 07/02/2012 8-13-7 Map output Pa 1 of 1 Existin wetlands as indicated b NHC GIS Mappin Board of Commissioners Meetin - 07/02/2012 a ht�p://wwwdefault.nhe & *ceName= *ron&... 6/13/2012 V .Esrnnap'?Servi envi , � � C) C) Nr co a) � �� , r �} � � \ ^� \ 07/02/2012 8-13-9 I wo, kt I �v Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-10 Date: Ma 31, 2012 Y Alew nanover Count Board of CommissioneFlk New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC ffe t1e undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re for p ir son 77c� t I As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Lafter and 1 can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411 , for further information 'in relation to this m. atter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-11 Name- -.Address Sig-nature ■ 0i r i.. 'L i P: t4 �- t 5 011111 , 1� + � ° 4 s Y P Y1) t v lL �P . `�, , � I�, I,_ s 4 ra..... tt 1 �"'s, -. wwwwxdm�aa wee ( Ol k � ii� ,na 1 )C 1 �; r ��IIH,Pt., �fim,n�� : �� tt "I'll 141 Y , >W4nit.. �\ 11i "�CSi , l y 'h: l� - hYaie }u. y1inQ!'��.r�,pA llc ��',, 11 `� b> 5�:.1Ntt: ^ iH @' III L Cl' -, 1 k r...;1 «?, � � !C �S;,n ie - 4,_ ). 7dtou� hHHlH \ \4'kN,Ltt wrn» tr J 9 -�, \� 1 . �i lG � v -. ,) ly .�,�. t ,� sc t ,� "J ,,D € : :t l W 4a 4 4. I wN vr . .......... . .. . ....... s -.., 1 ,a\ �� a. Y, 5m 4 II +, l a.. \'� I »z „ 1 �, os lS, � �Y1:. , a �1 Sfi tP ` ', 1{ �`i• I�= n `ilrk> 1)1.. . . ..... .. . ......... „r „nF7 Is ?�,\lny , ail, �, ,n. ,�. � � �, �..,. �• -; untah»uo» -7 o 0 or 1`1,11111 i } -_� , > -., tYl. kif�f l�1uV$ ,`'.. ' ' I ;,. ��. \`;.ks rvmus,@'� � .K'.br� �t� �" S� >.., ..,x, .}� - - .: , rr ,. � x�')l. ,t ,H -.: ( �d ,,...,, �jLkil ��"� SY 4l� � � � \?��r1�1 ( ��Nl 1 } 51"1” �� KYlss .: _ .. wa,�iu4 St40%, n .. mfik4 {gin 4 ""'I k I . , �H�i ,e.:: _.)14,.f',,iFV::N -tin. 4Y4 A ""pWlg � 1 au: ..i i ,:,. II ;: , Y- Ilk, A ” 1 1 „ ti ill"J Z' \ov§ 100 ll' II Iq , p � .) . .... . . . 'N" vt ' k , W � 7_77- Id %'016 . .... .. ■ ■ al 17 1211 � 'J� O �V . .. .. . ....... 00 " o"'t \�,x 1) - 1 4 1 ,_ , _ �s,= !. - '� , , s . , Ilk ..... . .. 11k �tI 130 o f Ilk " 1 0 A N , 0 k Ip vli ® "IN, ,.'ti. -P 1 ?Y � V, "'% e, 1, \ \IVNV.A 1�lYm,,,t11 I rr £ � � \ 9;<,t rc,\ ).!A t%�_. a k ' as �,W: � 3 I '�d , "Ie a,ie "'s ...... tt . ... ... . 15 lCt PIN 4j t .... . . .. .... I ... ......... ` IY'' 3 9r� 1� ',, ,`k ,i� ,.. y � 1t?i 9Yt � 11C �I -'3� 4l� �;4 �i8 aAq. J(S � . a,ir,tia` 1�14(K` V��:n, {l, ,.�) 4k ft , oi a� . . ... \l' Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-11 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissione New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC I As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8912 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-12 Date.- Ma 31 > 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commi'sMoners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wflml'n NC %I1.01,11111* As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-13 , . . I K \ \\ ^ /\\ New 2 }a n C ounty Board o : \2 ®z New °� < Ha n \ e / County Planning Boar \'11m n }\o n , \� \ 2 � the i nitiator \ r th .! °.< name , ` . Pame :� ,� .} � } . petition, \ \. � C °� 2 \,� j� } f � �� « and °« ( can «�,� contact at 8915 New Forest � }rive Wilmington, » ) � 28411, � fu further 2 ( f \\m at \ \ n \^ relation ft �° } \ : \ } ^} \ } ^ this � Board Of Commissioners Meet 07/02/2012 8-13-14 Dateffi. Ma 31, 2012 } r New s� sy i '�t� ' jr is 1` - �i {` � r,' C B s '` � { - C To: S i ` I, � t '�S ' r, ` Ss I a 1 S Al \ ti t I 91 ,� I,f4 �� S � tti '�` � � � Hanover New Sa, k i' {} s Pl anning � � r "f�, (i4 ti rl( �� , ,{ ,» �{ 4 ((s� �( �� ,�i1 Yq �� 4 S { S 'fi Wi NC t P ame l a z r 1 s t t 1 m y r co 1 ,' r j p e t i t ion , �' f # r r I'xr: „. r t r rx r name � 4 l` , i t L a tt er � ( I New F ores t D riv e , W �(± �; tis 284 f ur t her si th t t” � d � �� s I. matt � 1 ;� i 1 ( t Name' n Address Si 2. V cts Y /^' LC -A (C) ��Y i JOOOI j 16ur 4. s 5- MAR7 t3 qg -, 3 a 9 4 At ICON r LA ZO Cx t 1 0 - 9 crM 12 . T - , Y 13. 14. --77 15M WOW, Wow cf D N { W 8 . oard of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -15 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Comrnissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the in'Itiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela ■ Latter and I can be cont6ted at 8915 New Forest Dnve, Wilmin NC 2841 for furtheriWormation in relation to this matter. a (,-',117/02/2012 8-13-16 � JIF si Date.- Ma 31, 2014� To: New Hanover Count Board of Comm Issioners New Hanover Count PlannIn Board Wilm'I'n NC F, s tiie initiator of this petition, m name 'is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for further information in relation to this matter. Address Name Si M! 5 11 MIX, ON 4 uz ." F%d 0 Ru "I l a w ally y fi J� r �, '(r� t'; J ,� ��., '' d t � 5 �. ,t i,' � ! „P' ) ”' K' �� ; ,` II }' k 4 r I ct T C mmissi ners TITTee In 07/02/2012 8-13-17 i ll i ll �pillilli 1 1 i IIIIIiIIII III F ill" "Arn To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissione New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NIC I it As the initiator ot t ! , ! la ;I r New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for furtherinformation in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-18 S !% Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -19 L * _ t' . ,17 ,�'' ! rs{ t , i it ,} �,. tyL^ ` s r- ) l� {vk rS �` �; �i � ,,, Signature t t c: {{ t S ` , t , 2 y d Qffl l 5 1 �! r , fj 1 ij , } > i �2, ! y , i I ,,. ", .,n "2� ;., :. tk, , .}, . a „ l.. �" , i, r , d, , .,, ,. 3 .�.,� ,.., ,�1. A r 2 t\ ,.,, •£1 I "., 1;. >>; + M� Ili , I I t 1 }z „ { ,, t s „' t. J c i1 ,,` ,r. y J f t 44• # c t , { ,4 " `!, , , , ,,, y ,, 1^ ,# r ,' t\ t ,.: ; , �`'t1. a s, £, a it ; W 1 1 1 t tl i „ z 1 s` tt' f 4t` , S { Yes. s t s a " , -.... _, ,i, s , _..,, , �, r - 1 n 't•y�, „': 11 ,,,, , „ ., t ,, ,.. „ ",,,. ' }� �, ,,t t i ': §} �.�1,.. 2 ?tr�� a }7, yy �:.. 1 S I } 1 � + ,` 7 „t } ! +ti s + + 1 V V , t } r t \ }, t. , �. 1• i ti{: � 1 1 I t , �4; �( ,, t1,, I+ t;it., tell t'" `,, I 4j, �'? jis r t 1 ii tF t Z Y Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -19 Date: Ma 31,2012 'To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As thein'Iftiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Dr"Ive, WlImin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-20 Date: Ma 31, 2011 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board W101min NC We the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin request for the propert located at 8704 Market Street from 5-1 Business, B-2 Hi Business and, R-I 5 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District be denled. This hi densit plan 'is detrimental to the communit in g eneral for the fodowin As theinitiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411 , for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-21 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners. New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-22 02,,11 Date: Ma 31, 2012 As the initiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. -Addre'ss r LO) N K Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-23 Date: Ma 31,2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of thi's petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and 1 can be contacted at 8915 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-24 To New Hanover Count Board of CommIssioner New Hanover Count PlannIn Board ffilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-25 00// 2 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commii'sswioners New Hanover Count PlannIn Board W101min NC Rs to e initiator of t is petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-26 It To New Hanover Count Board of Commoissionerl New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC FAs t)e initiator of this petition, m name 'is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Dn've, Wilmin NC 28411, for furtherinformation in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-27 61011t-1, To: New Hanover Count Board of Comm'iss'ioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board W'11min NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further "Information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissi Meetin 07/02/,2,012 8-13-28 11 1 New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-29 6/a It 2 Date.- Ma 31,2012 TO New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board W'Iflmln NC As the initiator of this petition,, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-30 Date.- Ma 31, 201 j To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board W11min NC 10, il-11 Sy ` y1 „, s the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-31 Date: Ma 31, 2012 New x , �� n } f�- t � r ,, rf, P t � �� i� Com mi s s ion e r s t r Ha no ver -- ( rs `,` County Planning Board ll� , Wilm N fir t ;< 4! %., tt I 4 r1 Ojk t. S - ' 4s z. DrE denied R-1 5 Resldentlal to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin Distnoct be This hi densit plan 'is detrimental to the communit g eneral for the followin As theln'Iftlator of this petitlon, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, W'11min NC 2841 for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -32 Dateffl. Ma 31,2012 w To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Dnmve, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-33 Date: Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC We the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re fo the propert located at 8704 Market Street from B-1 Business, B-2 Hi Business an Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District be denied. I This hi densit plan is detrimental to the communit g eneral for the followin As the initiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further 'Information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-34 Datem. Ma 31, 2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plann"In Board Wilmin NC r. As the initiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela ■ Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmi"n NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-35 Date: Ma 31, 2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC We the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re fo the propert located at 8704 a Mrket Stre e t from B-1 Bu si ness, B-2 Hi Busine a ss n R-1 5 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District be denied. I This hi densit plan is detrimental to the communit g eneral for the followfun I AslhaWWotoir-ofthis petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-36 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 0 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wlimin NC Vle the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re form the propert located at 8704 Market Street from B-I Business, B-2 Hi Business an Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District be denoled. Thi's hi densit plan i's detrimental to the communit g eneral for the foilowin As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-37 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 0 Th New Hanover Count Board of Commissioner New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC pp As theinitlator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information 'in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-38 Date: Ma 31, 2012 ilew Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC M As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915, New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-39 Date., Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commi'ss'ioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wflm'ln NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and 'I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-40 Date: Ma 31 t 2012 a ro: ftew �_,'�"�',,anover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the'Initiator of t]`iis petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 891 E New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-41 x To,: New Hanover Count Board of Commissione New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC I Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-42 As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and 11 can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411 , for further information in relation to this mafter. w Date: Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC We the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re for the propert located at 8704 Market Street from B-1 Business, B-2 Hi Business and R-1 5 Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District'be denied. This hi densit plan 'is detrimental to the communit g eneral for the followin As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-43 Date: Ma 31 1 2011 0 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin INC We the undersi electors of New Hanover Count re that the rezonin re fo the propert located at 8704 Market Street from B-1 Business, B-2 Hi Business an Residential to EDZD Exceptional Desi Zonin District be denied. This hi densit plan is detrimental to the communit win g eneral for the followin I As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, formation Wilmin NC 28411, for further in in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-44 Date.- Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commimssmioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name i's Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 8 -13 -45 Date.- Ma 31, 201!� To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for further inforrnation in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-46 �*-MME a 31, 2012 New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 891 15-41, Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-47 IM% uate.- Ma 31, 201 To: New Hanover Count Board of CommIssloners New Hanover Count Plann'In Board Wl'ImIn NC f . As the tiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S.-Latter and I can be contacted at 891 E., New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-48 Name 'Address Si D es 2. V RVAI-CAOR- 3. T 4. 5 j VC 5. 6. t 7- J I A 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-48 Date., Ma 31, 20VI-A To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for further information in relation to this matter. t"J491. - �6. 1(3 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-49 Oate: Ma 31, 2012 To New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC the initiator of -this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for furtherinformation in relation to this matiter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-50 Name Address Si nature. 1. !t10'n& }{obbS C acvi I ('e C+ i 2. G�1�j s i-tayL7s �Sq 13 S�'�vi Il.e C{-. ` 3- lAn. Rt�� f 723 N.� 1Faresf 1 Jr. zF.J 4. - F x( dle SQ IC0400, I ............. 5 . i0 O 0 LP tot I &A(O 6 7 /a[�i1g C�SZI t�L.g1141c� (.+4b v 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-50 lAal'e: Ma 31 2012 To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners- New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-51 Ma 31 s 201-5 *,ate. a To: New Hanover Count Board of CommIssioners. New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for furtherinformation 'in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-52 Ma ate. To: New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-53 t e - a Ma 31 3 201 rom Iew Hanover Count Board of Commissionerz� New Hanover Count Plannin Board g ; n, NC the ator of this peon, m name is Pamela S. Lafter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 2841 for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-54 ,wate: Ma 31, 2011; fo: ilew Aanover Count Board of Commissioners- New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wl'Imin NC As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 8915 New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. N I n Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-55 *.Itlate: Ma 31 20155, To: lew Hanover Count Board of Commissioners New Hanover Count Plannin Board Wilmin NC This hi densit plan i's detrimental to the communit in g eneral for the followin As the initiator of this petition, m name is Pamela S. Latter and I can be contacted at 891 0 " New Forest Drive, Wilmin NC 28411, for further information in relation to this matter. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 8-13-56 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 9 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Sam Burgess, Senior Planner; Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager and Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director (Planning Board Rep: Dan Hilla) CONTACT(S): Sam Burgess, Senior Planner; Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager, or Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z -920, 06/12) - Request by Dean Exline on Behalf of Seabreeze Seafood Inc. to Rezone 2.48 Acres at 1026 State Avenue, 1068 and 1074 South Seabreeze Road from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential BRIEF SUMMARY: At their June 7, 2012 meeting, the Planning Board voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the rezoning request. Several nearby property owners spoke in support of the request. One nearby /adjacent landowner voiced concerns on how setbacks would affect his property zoned B -2 Highway Business if the surrounding properties were rezoned to R -15 Residential. The site is identified as Conservation on the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Seabreeze Area Plan. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Understand and act on citizen needs RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval. Action of Rezoning Request Needed Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153A -341 which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." Example for approval The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential as described is: 1) Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "conservation" classification in the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan; and 2) Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 2.48 acres of B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential . Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -0 Example for denial The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from B- 2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential as described is: 1) Not consistent with the purposes and intent of the "conservation" classification in the 2006 Land Use Plan. 2) Unreasonable and not in the public interest to rezone 2.48 acres of B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential. ATTACHMENTS: Z -920 Script Z -920 Staff Summary Z -920 Petition Summary Z -920 Adjacent Property Owner Map Z -920 Zoning- Aerial Map Z -920 Zoning Map Z -920 Staff Recommendation Zoning Map Z -920 Applicant Materials COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Continued to the August 6 meeting by a vote of 4 -1, Commissioner Barfield dissenting. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -0 Item # 9 Script for Rezoning (Z -920) 06/12 Request by Dean Exline on behalf of Seabreeze Seafood, Inc. to rezone 2.48 acres at 1026 State Avenue, 1068 and 1074 South Seabreeze Road from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential. The site is identified as Conservation on the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Seabreeze Area Plan. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Open the Public Hearing: a. Staff presentation b. Petitioner's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Petitioner's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the Public Hearing 4. Commissioner Discussion 5. If the Rezoning is denied there is a 12 month waiting period before you may resubmit. Do you wish to proceed or do you wish to continue the matter? 6. Vote on rezoning. The motion to rezone should include a statement saying how the change is or is not consistent with the land use plan and why it is reasonable and in the public interest. Examples of motions appear on the agenda item cover sheet. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -1 -1 CASE: Z -920 (06/12) PETITIONER: Dean Exline on behalf of Seabreeze Seafood, Inc. REQUEST: Rezone Several Parcels from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential ACREAGE: 2.48 ACRES LOCATION: 1026 State Avenue, 1068 & 1074 Seabreeze Road South LAND CLASS: Conservation Planning Board Action At their regular meeting on June 7, the Planning Board recommended approval of the petitioner's request. The vote by the Board was 5 -1. One nearby /adjacent landowner voiced concerns on how setbacks would affect his property zoned B -2 Highway Business if the surrounding properties were rezoned to R -15 Residential. Staff Summary The petitioner's property consists of three contiguous parcels of land located near the southeastern elbow of South Seabreeze Road in southern New Hanover County. Access to the parcels of land is from State Avenue and Seabreeze Road South. The parcels contain approximately 2.48 acres which includes property that may be marsh or submerged waters emanating from the Intracoastal Waterway. One old, dilapidated structure once known as a seafood house is located on a portion of the property. Present zoning of the petitioner's property is B -2 Highway Business. The purpose of the B -2 Highway District is to provide for more intensive commercial services. Although most of the commercial uses that existed in the Seabreeze community have long since closed, this "bullet" shaped district has not been modified since its creation in the early 1970's. New development has not occurred in the area at the rate it was anticipated due to a variety of challenges related to the areas susceptibility to hurricane activity and standards which apply to commercial construction in the AE (100 year) and VE (high velocity) zones located throughout the community. Not too many notable land use features are located nearby with the exception of a Bed and Breakfast located north of the proposal, a jet ski rental location and several docks /piers that extend out into the Intracoastal Waterway. Traffic near the petitioner's property on Seabreeze Road South can be characterized as light in nature. Average daily trips near the intersection of Seabreeze Road South and Carolina Beach Road have decreased from 26 in 2010 to 22,743 in 2011. Signalization installed by NCDOT near the intersection has mitigated traffic conflict issues leading to Snows Cut Bridge to the South and areas north heading toward Wilmington. The Level of Service (LOS) along this segment of Carolina Beach Road is C (traffic volumes increasing). The 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan identifies the area as "Conservation." The "Conservation" land classification is characterized as providing for effective long -term management and protection of significant, limited, or irreplaceable natural resources while also protecting the rights of the property owner. Management of these areas may be required for a number of reasons, including natural, cultural, recreational, productive or scenic values, but are primarily flood prone areas. Density within the "Conservation" area is limited to 2.5 units per acre. Z -920, 06/12 Page 1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -2 -1 In July, 1988, the community plan entitled, Seabreeze ... A Heritage Renewed was crafted and adopted by the County. Resident and property owner concerns listed in the plan included the loss of waterfront commercial activities from the area which at one time was a thriving beach resort for blacks during the 1940's and `50's. Other residential concerns listed in the plan include housing conditions, development pressures, lack of recreational areas, and lack of shopping facilities. Since the plan was adopted, eventful residential and commercial development activity has not materialized largely in part due to building standards for flood prone areas, economic constraints and apathy. However, a residential neighborhood known as Seabreeze Sound has been created nearby. Project development on the 36 lot neighborhood has been slow due to the economic turn -down of the past four years but has enhanced development of the area by consolidating a number of small parcels. staff Pncitinn Staff is encouraged that the petitioner is requesting a rezoning modification from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential for a couple of reasons. First, the existing area of B -2 Highway Business does not lend itself to such an intensive use considering the natural environmental constraints that exist nearby. These constraints would include the property being located in a VE Flood zone and adjacent to a primary nursery area. The proposed down zoning of a portion of existing commercial district will actually decrease any land intensity concerns in the future. Second, it is encouraging to witness that subtle activity is beginning to emerge in an area that has been depressed for a long period of time. This activity may provide a positive rippling effect on other nearby properties. Staff would also recommend that a sliver or remnant piece of B -2 Highway Business property adjacent and south of the petitioner's property (Carl Biggs property) be rezoned to R -15 Residential in addition to the portion of Seabreeze Road South right -of -way fronting the petitioner's property. Staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request. Action of Rezoning Request Needed Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153A -341, which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." Example for approval: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential as described is: 1) Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Conservation" classification in the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan. 2) Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 2.48 acres of B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential . Z -920, 06/12 Page 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -2 -2 Example for denial: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential as described is: 1) Not consistent with the purposes and intent of the "conservation" classification in the 2006 Land Use Plan. 2) Unreasonable and not in the public interest to rezone 2.48 acres of B -2 Highway Business to R- 15 Residential. Z -920, 06/12 Page 3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -2 -3 Case Z -920 (06/12) Rezone 2.48 acres from B -2 Highway Business to R -15 Residential Petition Summary Data 1026 State Avenue, 1068 & 1074 South Seabreeze Road Owner /Petitioner Dean Exline on behalf of Seabreeze Seafood, Inc. Existing Land Use Vacant Zoning History Area 4 (April 7, 1971) Land Classification Conservation Water Type Private Sewer Type Private Recreation Area Snows Cut Park Access & Traffic Volume South Seabreeze Road Average Daily Trips (ADT) on Carolina Beach Road (Just North of Snows Cut) have decreased from 26,624 (2010) to 22,743 (2011). Fire District New Hanover County South Watershed & Water Quality Classification Seabreeze SA: HQW Aquifer Recharge Area A shallow water -table sand aquifer and underlying artesian aquifer containing fresh water over salty water. Conservation /Historic /Archaeological Resources Small area of salt marsh Soils Kureb (Class 1), Newhan (Class 1) Septic Suitability Suitable Schools Anderson Elementary School & Carolina Beach Elementary School Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9 -3 -1 ra w w f i� • 4 b LU ` •e k° ®- k m 1iS"q�y Y `• 'd ry iF °a � % •i % ry 4 .� 91 •� � 0 Pir mo� 7" 6Afj 4i ■ ffl � ffl�rW m mob. Ly--j I L� LL ti %%6 b ®� ® ti its' y •a '� fir" " ®• t., �� ••e S, "h• S. 1 (� S 4r 111V M °• S 14 % Lim 1 ®% 1 ° fi ti k • k, �,� � r z ° � %% y q % ®" gy•k'%6 S• b" U S q, tl � y • 'L ° • k 1 ' y® % % S 3 Si °•� y y � •`q„ ° t z % . S % � y �� 1 �� ® by "� ®�•� ®u cl , ................. ' # f �n � Ip t �0 Board of C m'ssio ers Meeting 7/0 /20 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 A. How will this chan of zonin serve the publ'c interest? t I 1 0 m knowled linformatlion, and bellieL JL" g nature of Petitioner and/or Prbpert Owner 7ame Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 9-8-3 W SURVEYING - MAPPING - GIS Www- Via Hand Deliv New Hanover Count Plannin and Inspections Department Attention: ' Mr. Chns OKeefe, Director 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilrrn'n NC 28403 Re: Application for Zonin Map Amendment Chan in Zonin from B-2 to R- 15 - South Seabreeze Road 311 Jud Road, Suite 31 Wilmin North Carolina 28405 910.799.0099 Voice 910.799.3327 Fax a The application is accompanied b additional information and a check for $500.00, representin the filin fee. We believe this ter is complete, however, we ask that if there are an q uestions or comments, please contact the undersi as soon as possible. We would respectfull re that the application be processed as soon as possibi4 w 'th a v' w towards be* i le in considered at the June 2012 Plannin Board meetin REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Affg h� &INA, SOUTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA, KENTU KY, AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. SURVEYING - MAPPING - GIS www. p 311 Jud Road, Suite &** Wilmin North Carolina 28405 910.799.0099 Voice 910.799.3327 Fax Parcel 2: 1064 S Seabreeze Road (Shown as 1074 S Seabreeze Road on Zonin Map' All of the above parcels are conti to one another. Total Area to be rezoned-: 2.4848 Acres per tax records I I Board of C r* omm W f sioners Mee in REGSTERED PROFESSONAL LAND SURV RTH C R LINA, SOUTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, 0 AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. , _c All o n SURVEYING ■ MAPPING GIS www. Olmn, 311 Jud Road, Suite 31 Wilmin North Carolina 2840.51 910.799.0099 Voicq 9 10. 799.3327 Fa-.,,4 Answers to q uestions about What Must be Established for a Chan In Zonin 1. How would the re chan be consistent with the Count Policies fol` Growth and Development'll 2. How would the re zone chan be consistent with the propert classification on the Land Classification Map? The conservation desi is a classification on CAMA Land Use Plan which limitF hi densit proposals. The desi would be preserved as NO hi densit W' bein proposed b this rezonin re 3. What si c ant n eb hborhood chan have occurred to m ake the ori 19 zonin inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existin zonm" !�1. How Will this chan of zonin serve the public ti K J � 0 The Communit is in need of revitalization and this activit will -help dn've {ytEGISTE rte, ED PROFESSIONAL fir 9&dSOk iWvAkdLiNA, SOUTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, 9 8'- 6 AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. g ) j y = C n) 7 FD 311 Jud Road, Suite 3D Wilmin North Carolina 28405 910.799.0099 Voice 910.799.3327 Fax SURVEYING - MAPPING Airlie While the Sea Breeze communit has envisioned an " Road" communit concept of development, the realit for the last 30 y ears is that the Communit has been constrained b the followin This is It ver difficult business location. Business si on Carolina Beach Roai would also have to be ne or purchased or non-existent, as these parcels are privatel owned b others with no g uarantee for si d. T of businesses allowable within B-2 zon4 Board of Commissioners Meetin REGISTERED PROFESSI I ONAL LAND SURV� Ky Zq 6LNA, SOUTH CAROLINA, , I VIRGINIA RTH GARC WEST VIRGNIA, KENTUC ro AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. 07/02/2012 9 -8 -8 I I Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 h-ftp://wwwdefault.nhc SkNYTMS 1 64326964120- 4/9/2012 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 hftp .-//vvwxvdefauIt.nhc com/output/basemap 9- SkVIMS 113 8 4011244 93 4 j P9 3/13/2012 - Ml CL 7EW S&WRE-US RO N m. 114a, 1137 OF 1140 112D, 1112, 1136 GLM ST - - 1132" 100i 'i I 17, 113 1109 1009. 1124, RO B 1116, W17 1036 1029, 1101 1108, 1112, 1000" IM4. 1104 f1k 1010 I LM .10M low, 1100, low w LH 1014 0 lam 1074 Iola rra WATV r „ - -. p lom 1017 1021. 1013 1025 1029 7702, 7M 1033 A 7703 iW 7707 10 FU21 7711 104a, 7714 II 1003".' 7716, Ma 7718 7719 a 1034 WO, 71 TM 7723 7725 pp.t%fATE Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 hftp .-//vvwxvdefauIt.nhc com/output/basemap 9- SkVIMS 113 8 4011244 93 4 j P9 3/13/2012 P illt R1 0 9 R 0 8 !:, 11 S - 0 0 7 - 0 a 1 - C n. 01-1 . . . . ... . ............................... ..... ...... ...... .. .... .... .... S EA F i P E S A 6, V V126 AVF.- Imm Alt ID 313111.55.6660.000 Address 1026 STATE AVE Unit NC. cit WILMINGTON Zip Code 27410 Nei CAS03 Class COM-Cornmercial Land Use Code 958-Unused Land Livin Units Acres 1.0704 Zonin B-2-BUSINESS DISTRICT Le Description ( 1.07 ACRES(C)) LOTS 1-7 BLK B, SEABREEZE & PT PARK AVE RNV Tax District ED Owner SEABREEZE SEAFOOD INC C4 GREENSBORO State NC. Countr Zip 27410 i ll 11 11: 11111 i� �� iiii i i Z 11� ��IE�LM Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 http-.Hetax.nhc 3/13/2012 New Hanover Count Pa I of I PAM13-, I . . ........ . . . . ... .. . . ... ... ... ... ... . . ..... ,, ,, r, SEALIRJEL IZO S [A Alt ID 313111-65.0781-000 Address 1064 S, SEABREEZE RD Unit SEABREEZE SEAFOOD INC Cit WILMINGTON Zip Code NC Nei CAS03 Class COM-Commercial Land Use Code 958-Unused Land Livin Units Acres .6544 Zonin 13-2-BUSINESS, DISTRICT Le Description Tax District LOT I BLK G SEA BREEZE (0.66 ACRES ED ow Ive Is Owner SEABREEZE SEAFOOD INC cit HILLSBOROLIGH State NC Countr Zip 27278 THE DATA IS FROM 2012 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 ht�pl-,Hetax.nhe 3/13/2012 PARID: ROSS 13-0 05—OC 1-000 I'll . .......... ... . ... .... .... ... ....................... .. --- .................. ..... ...... . .. . ... S E A BIRFt E FE, Z r.- Slt�! A 'o"O 0 D C 1426S SEASIREIC-ZE RD :S Alt ID 313111-65-0674.000 Address 1068 S SEABREEZE RD Unit FD cit WILMINGTON Zip Code Nei CAS03 Class COM-Commercial Land Use Code ® & Seafbods-Retail Livin Units Acres .76 Zonin B-2-BUSINESS DISTRICT L i I Le Description (0.76 ACRES 1-3/6/6 BLK A SEABREEZE & PT PARK AVE RIW Tax District FD ( '.) w Owner SEABREEZE SEAFOOD INC cit HILLSBOROUGH State NC Countr Zip 27278 THE DATA IS FROM 2012 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 http-.Hetax.nhc ih71 --�RO8518-005-001-000& 3/13/2012 311 Jud Road, Suite 3D Wilmin North Carolina 28405 910.799.0099 Voice )IM] (0) VY] am PC- 910-799.3327 Fax SURVEYING - MAPPING - GIS www. Description of Surve for Seabreeze Seafood Inc. Proposed Area to be Rezoned to R-1Z Situated in the State of North Carolina, Count of New Hanover, Township of Federal Point and more particularl described as follows-. Be for Reference at a Nall Found at the intersection of the centerhne of outh Seabreeze Road (60.00 feet wide) and the centerline of North Seabreeze Road. Thence South 68 de 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 322.42 feet to an Iron Pin Found on the south Ri of Wa of South Seabreeze Road. Said Iron Pin Set bein the PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BEGINNING for this surve Thence With sa-ld South Seabreeze Road Ri of Wa Line, the followin Thence leavin said Ri of Wa North 89 de 06 minutes 36 seconds a East, 140.61 to a point on the West side of M Grove Sound, Thence with said West side of M Grove Sound, the followin courses: W, 01 Thence with said south line of said Zonin Line, North 73 de 06 minutes a 57 seconds West, 195.08 feet to a point, said point bein at the intersection of the West line of Sabreeze Seafood and said South line of B-2 Zonm* Thence with said West line of Seabreeze Seafood, North 00 de 53 minutes 23 seconds West, 36.44 feet to point on the North line of Seabreeze Seafood parcel; NEGISTERED PROFESSIONAL A99A khWbWRINA, SOUTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. q SURVEYING - MAPPING - GIS www. 311 Jud Road, Suite 3D Wilmin North Carolina 28405 910.799.0099 Voice 910.799.3327 Fax Thence with sajd line of said Seabreeze Seafood parcel, North 89 de -#V minutes 22 seconds East 216.01 feet to a point on the Seabreeze Seafood parcel- 2 P Thence South 00 de 52 minutes 42 seconds East, 72.02 feet to a point-., Thence North 89 de 06 minutes 37 seconds East, 74.65 feet to a point-, Thence North 00 de 52 n3inutes 44 seconds West, 156.98 feet to the PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 1.47 acres or 63,826 S Ft., more or less. This desc * tion was based on an actual field surve b Geolnnovation, PC. A1711 rip y 5 X 30" rebar with a cap M'scribed with [4,0""ins referred to as set are �'GEOINNOVATION SURVEY". 0 Basis of becq =* for this surve is NAD 1983 / 1986 as based on North Carolina Geodetic Surve monument "Freeman". All distances shown herein are g round US Surve Foot. NEGISTERED PROFESSIONAL MAM �Ckft!_INA, SOUTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, 0 AND THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. I Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 9-8-17 0-14 ff 0 a CD 0 0 PWWW-L r + Pd CD CL 1 4 0 n M > Awl N ;I M C) cn ( M W-n 0 Ell" -.L CO CD C) z > C) > 00 eb W Dom as ILA X a L Ul _j 00 P-4 a co 0 CD r7 0 'i cn > tri tz N > t7l cn C) cn M OIQ > CL 0 z tQ uj UJ 0 t e C) z tQ -11 00 Mi C a l tz I CO3 CL M 4 CT CD 0 C) M 0 lid 0 EL CL 93 cS. ta, a, a CD 0 w > ' OL NOW &M W CA cn tQ BMW F cn 0 cn cn 0 M C L 0 c: 0 CD z 0 -4 -4 co 0 co 4h- CA 2. pot CD CD Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 9-8-17 0-14 ff 0 a CD 0 0 PWWW-L r + Pd CD CL 1 4 0 n M > Awl N ;I M C) cn ( M W-n 0 Ell" -.L CO CD C) z > C) > 00 eb W Dom as ILA X a L Ul _j 00 P-4 a co 0 CD r7 0 'i cn > tri tz N > t7l cn C) cn M OIQ > CL 0 z tQ uj UJ 0 t e C) z tQ -11 00 Mi C a l tz I db Ord AP 5 0 CL CL am w w 0 Ln CA 4 to OD ca 2 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 9-8-18 LC CD • CD rd -n —4 4h, ca G) 0 U) z T w E. w :j co M M > C:) 0) > 0 X M -n -u M U) n %b.dw X 0 2 Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 9-8-18 (, 1 Please note that for q uasi-jud i cial procee eit t attornei - r € c h earin g must Er Y- � � pu b lic ( PrM " L v 4. Hanover Count -,',or a dec appl descr i n pet Th t A Name, A&rass, Ernall i0r, Tolephonk-s. Si o-11' Owner ( s ) ( Print or Ty t, Dean ® Ex1i ne, 311 Judg a, Ste 3D, , Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 9-8-19 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 10 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Nicole Dreibelbis, Current Planner; and Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director (Planning Board Rep: Dan Hilla) CONTACT(S): Nicole Dreibelbis, Current Planner; and Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z -921, 06/12) - Request by Joshua Mihaly on Behalf of Shellington Properties Inc. to Rezone 1.63 Acres at 7627 and 7633 Market Street from R -15 Residential to CD(O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional in Order to Develop a Professional Office Park BRIEF SUMMARY: The Planning Board voted 6 -0 at their June 7, 2012 meeting to recommend approval of the rezoning request. They also voted 6 -0 to approve the conditional rezoning permit including staff's suggested conditions. No one from the public spoke in support or in opposition. The site is classified as Transition according to the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Market Street Corridor Plan. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Attract and retain new and expanding businesses • Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs • Understand and act on citizen needs RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval. ACTION #1 : Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153A -341 which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." EXAMPLE for approval: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from R -15 Residential district to CD (O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional as described is: 1. Consistent with the purpose and intent of Policy 4.3 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan, which references maximizing effectiveness of commercial uses by assuring that land is available for commercial uses within close proximity to the markets they serve and by ensuring that such commercial uses do not diminish the quality of life in nearby residential areas. Further, the Market Street Corridor Plan, adopted April 2011, Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -0 recommends future development of a pedway along Market Street; and 2. Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 1.63 acres from R -15 Residential to CD (O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional in this location in order to develop an office park between two established non - residential uses and buffering the adjacent residential property to the north. ACTION # 2 NEEDED Use the Script/Worksheet to make findings and 1. Grant the special use; or 2. Add conditions to the special use; or 3. Deny the special use on the grounds that the findings of fact violate one or more of the four criteria. ATTACHMENTS: Z -921 Script Z -921 Staff Summary Z -921 Petition Summary Z -921 Adjacent Property Map Z -921 Zoning- Aerial Map Z -921 Corridor Map Z -921 Market Street Corridor Reference Z -921 Table of Permitted Uses Z -921 Site Plan Z -921 Applicant Materials Z -921 Traffic Impact Worksheet COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: The rezoning was approved 5 -0. The special use permit was approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -0 ITEM# 10 SCRIPT FOR CONDITIONAL REZONING Z- 921(06/12) Request by Joshua Mihaly on behalf of Shellington Properties, Inc. to rezone 1.63 acres at 7627 and 7633 Market Street from R -15 Residential to CD(O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional in order to develop a professional office park. The site is classified as Transition according to the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map and is within the Market Street Corridor Plan. Swear in witnesses 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Open the Public Hearing: a. Staff Presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) C. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the Public Hearing 4. Commissioner discussion S. If the Rezoning is denied there is a 12 month waiting period before you may resubmit. Do you wish to proceed or do you wish to continue the matter? 6. Ask Applicant whether he /she agrees with staff findings and any proposed conditions. 7. Vote on rezoning. (First Vote) The motion to rezone should include a statement saying how the change is or is not consistent with the land use plan and why it is reasonable and in the public interest. Examples of motions are on the agenda item cover sheet. 8. Vote on the companion special use permit. (Second Vote) Motion to grant the permit - All findings are positive. Motion to grant the permit, subject to conditions specified below: (State Conditions) In Motion to deny because, if completed as proposed, the development more probably than not: 13 a. Will endanger the public health or safety for the following reasons: 13 b. Does not meet all required conditions and specifications, in particular: 13 c. Will injure the value of adjoining or abutting property in the following way: 13 d. Will not be in harmony with the area in which it is located for the following reasons: Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -1 -1 CASE: Z -921 (06/12) PETITIONER: Joshua Mihaly on behalf of Shellington Properties, Incorporated REQUEST: Rezone from R -15, Residential to CD (O &I), Conditional Office and Institutional ACREAGE: 1.63 Acres LOCATION: 7627 and 7633 Market Street LAND CLASS: Transition PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board voted 6 -0 at their June 7, 2012 meeting to recommend approval of the rezoning request. They also voted 6 -0 to approve the conditional rezoning permit including staff's suggested conditions. No one from the public spoke in support or opposition. STAFF SUMMARY PROPERTY SPECIFICS The subject properties are accessed off of Market Street, an urban principal arterial roadway, located northeast of Bayshore Drive and southwest of Marsh Oaks Drive. The proposal includes two parcels, parcel I is addressed 7627 Market Street (71 acres) and parcel II is addressed 7633 Market Street (.92acres). The development proposal encompasses a combined acreage of 1.63 acres. Both tracts are owned by Shellington Properties, Incorporated and are currently vacant unused land. CHARACTER OF THE AREA: Current Zoning The R -15 Residential District is established as a district in which the principal use of land is for residential purposes and to insure that residential development not having access to public water and dependent upon septic tanks for sewage disposal will occur at sufficiently low densities to insure a healthful environment. The subject site is located between two non - residential uses. Immediately northeast of the subject properties is an existing O &I, office and Institutional district, developed as an existing office park. Immediately north and west is a continuation of the R -15 residential designation. However, immediately adjacent, along the west border of the subject properties, Christ's Sanctified Holy Church has been established. Southeast, across Market Street the zoning transitions to B -2, Highway Business and includes both vacant property and a used car lot. Proposed Zoning The purpose of the Office and Institutional District shall be to provide areas where institutional uses, professional office uses and other uses compatible to uses of an office or institutional nature shall be encouraged to locate and to provide protection for this type land use from encroachment by other less desirable uses. The district's principal means of ingress and egress shall be along collector roads, minor arterials, and /or major arterials as designated on the County's Thoroughfare Classification Plan. Case Z -921, (06/12) Page 1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10-2-1 The conditional use district procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the objectives of the ordinance but none of the general zoning district classifications which would allow that use is acceptable. The procedure is for firm development proposals, and shall not be used for tentative projects without definitive plans. The proposal is CD (O &I) to accommodate a three phase office park, containing three two -story buildings, totaling 14,400 square feet of gross floor area of office space and a one story,2,200 square foot accessory building. Phase one includes construction of one of the two story buildings and the accessory structure, complete with installation of sixteen (16) parking spaces. Phase II will construct the second two story building and the additional required parking accommodations to service the additional structure and future construction of Phase III, consistent with Section 81 of the Zoning Ordinance. Phase III will construct the final two story building. TRAFFIC: As of December 2011 counts, the ADT of Market Street, north of Alexander Road has a volume of 45,105vpd; however, the capacity of the road is 43,700 vpd. Therefore, the LOS for the portion of Market Street fronting the subject properties is F, meaning the traffic counts exceed the capacity of the roadway. The traffic impact worksheet, provided by the applicant, estimates development of the professional office park will produce an AM peak of 22 trips and a PM peak of 21 trips. Therefore, a traffic impact analysis is not required. COMMUNITY SERVICES: Water /Sewer: Service is not currently provided to either of the subject properties; however, water is available and new construction would be required to extend to the sewer line, located 500 feet from the subject parcels per CFPUA ordinance. Fire Protection: The property will be served by New Hanover County Fire Services. Schools: School districts are determined by the New Hanover County Board of Education periodically. If the request is granted, the use will not be residential, so no impact on schools is anticipated. LAND CLASSIFICATION: The subject properties are located in the northern portion of the county in an area classified as Transition according to the 2006 CAMA Land Classification Map. The purpose of the Transition class is to provide for future intensive urban development on lands that have been or will be provided with necessary urban services. The location of these areas is based upon land use planning policies requiring optimum efficiency in land utilization and public service delivery. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The subject properties are located within the Pages Creek watershed drainage area which is classified as SA; HQW 3 03 . The soil maps indicate Leon sand is the only soil located on the subject properties. Leon Sand is a Class III soil and has severe limitations which require extensive modification and intensive maintenance. PLANS AND POLICIES: Case Z -921, (06/12) Page 2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -2 -2 Policy 4.3 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Update outlines the desire to maximize effectiveness of commercial uses by assuring that land is available for commercial uses within close proximity to the markets they serve and by ensuring that such commercial nodes do not diminish the quality of life in nearby residential areas. Chapter 6 of the Market Street Corridor Plan suggests there is adequate right -of -way on the northern side of Market Street to provide an eight -foot sidewalk between Military Cutoff Road and Porters Neck Road. STAFF POSITION The 1.63 acre proposal is located north of the Bayshore /Market Street intersection in an area classified as transition. The subject properties are located between two non - residential uses, an existing office park and a developed church. The twenty foot buffer will mitigate potential impact on the adjacent residential use, established to the north. The traffic impact worksheet indicates the additional traffic will be minimal to the site. Further, future development of the proposed pedway along the entire length of the Market Street corridor and installation of pedestrian signals at the intersections of Bayshore and Market and Marsh Oaks and Market will mitigate impacts to the Level of Service. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval. ACTION #1: Adopt a statement in accordance with NCGS 153A -341 which requires that "Prior to adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in the public interest." EXAMPLE for approval: The County Commissioners find that this request for zoning map amendment from R -15 Residential district to CD (O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional as described is: 1. Consistent with the purpose and intent of Policy 4.3 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan, which references maximizing effectiveness of commercial uses by assuring that land is available for commercial uses within close proximity to the markets they serve and by ensuring that such commercial uses do not diminish the quality of life in nearby residential areas. Further, the Market Street Corridor Plan, adopted April 2011, recommends future development of a pedway along Market Street. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 1.63 acres from R -15 Residential to CD (O &I) Conditional Office and Institutional in this location in order to develop an office park between two established non - residential uses and buffering the adjacent residential property to the north. BECAUSE THIS IS A CONDITIONAL USE DISTRICT, STAFF HAS THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE COMPANION SPECIAL USE PERMIT: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT: In its review of the request, the Planning Staff made the following preliminary "findings of fact. " Case Z -921, (06/12) Page 3 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -2 -3 1. The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. A. Fire Service is provided by New Hanover County Fire Services. B. Service is not currently provided to either of the subject properties; however, water is available and new construction would be required to extend to the sewer line, located 500 feet from the subject parcels per CFPUA ordinance. C. As of December 2011 counts, the ADT of Market Street, north of Alexander Road has a volume of 45,105vpd; however, the capacity of the road is 43,700 vpd. Therefore, the LOS for the portion of Market Street fronting the subject properties is F, meaning the traffic counts exceed the capacity of the roadway. The traffic impact worksheet, provided by the applicant, estimates development of the professional office park will produce an AM peak of 22 trips and a PM peak of 21 trips. Therefore, a traffic impact analysis is not required. Staff Suggestion: Evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety where proposed road improvements required by NCDOT are implemented. 2. The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. A. Conditional zoning districts are designed for firm development proposals and not for tentative development. A three phase office park, containing three two -story buildings, totaling 14,400 square feet of office space and a one story,2,200 square foot , accessory building will not have a significant adverse impact on the adjacent church to the southeast and existing office park to the northeast . Further, the applicant proposes a 20 foot landscaped buffer, along the northern border of parcel II, mitigating any potential negative impacts to the adjacent single family residence. B. The applicant received a variance on April 24, 2012 from Section 67B -1(1), width of buffer strips. The Zoning Ordinance requires a twenty foot buffer between non - residential uses and any residential use or district. The applicant was approved for a reduction of ten feet along the western border of the property, adjacent to the church site. C. Signage will be required to satisfy the sign standards as specified in both Section 59.1.4 and 59.6 -6 of the Zoning Ordinance. D. The proposal is located within the Special Highway Overlay District and development will be subject to the standards outlined in Section 59.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff Suggestion: Evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use can meet all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity. A. No evidence has been submitted that this project will decrease property values of residents who live nearby. Staff Suggestion: The evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. Case Z -921, (06/12) Page 4 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -2 -4 4. The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover County. A. The 2006 Land Use Plan Update identifies the subject properties as Transition. The transition designation is to provide for further intensive urban development on lands that have been or will be provided with necessary urban services. The location of these areas is based upon land use planning policies requiring optimum efficiency in land utilization and public service delivery. B. Policy 4.3 of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Update outlines the desire to maximize effectiveness of commercial uses by assuring that land is available for commercial uses within close proximity to the markets they serve and by ensuring that such commercial nodes do not diminish the quality of life in nearby residential areas. C. Chapter 6 of the Market Street Corridor Plan suggests there is adequate right -of -way on the northern side of Market Street to provide an eight -foot sidewalk between Military Cutoff Road and Porters Neck Road. The 1.63 acre proposal is located north of the Bayshore /Market Street intersection in an area classified as transition. The subject properties are located between two non - residential uses, an existing office park and a developed church, in an area that will likely continue to experience population growth and commercial development. The twenty foot buffer will mitigate potential impact on the adjacent residential use, established to the north. The traffic impact worksheet indicates the additional traffic will be minimal to the site. Staff suggests that findings are positive; however, would propose the following condition be placed on the conditional use rezoning permit which the petitioner /property owner must agree to for the permit to be valid: The owner dedicates a twenty (20) foot access easement on the subject property for future development of a pedway along Market Street, consistent with the Market Street Corridor Plan and Section 67B -3 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. ACTION # 2 NEEDED: Note: A Special Use Permit is a quasi - judicial action requiring an evidentiary hearing and findings of fact. Use the Script /Worksheet to make findings and Case Z -921 (06/12) Rezone 1.63 acres from R -15, residential to CD (0&1), conditional office and institutional Petition Summary Data 7641 Market Street Owner /Petitioner: Joshua Mihaly on behalf of Shellington Properties, Inc. Existing Land Use: R -15, residential (vacant) Zoning History: Area 5 (July 6, 1971) Land Classification: Transition Water Type CFPUA Sewer Type: Sewer is within 500 feet of the parcel and future development would be required to extend sewer. Recreation Area Blair Elementary School Access & Traffic Volume: The ADT of Market Street, north of Alexander Road has a volume of 45,105vpd; however, the capacity of the road is 43,700. Therefore, the LOS for the portion of Market Street fronting the subject properties has a LOS of F, meaning the traffic counts exceed the capacity of the roadway. Fire District: New Hanover County Fire Service District Watershed & Water Quality Classification: Pages Creek (SA; HQW 303) Aquifer Recharge Area: A shallow water table and aquifer and underlying artesian aquifer containing fresh water over salty water. Conservation /Historic /Archaeological Resources: The entire parcel is located with the Special Highway Overlay District (S.H.O.D.). No flood or conservation areas located on the subject property. The Conservation Overlay District classifies the property as Urban and Developed Land fronting Market Street; however, transitions to Pocosin in the rear. Soils: Leon Sand is the only soil located on the subject property. Septic Suitability: Leon Sand is a Class III soil. It has severe limitations and requires extensive modification and intensive maintenance. Schools: Blair Elementary School Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -3 -1 u W m W W CY 0 LU fy W Q CY W m D z W W Z u W (n u Z U 0 Z W_ LL F- U U) Z Z Z LU LL F Z u Z U 0 Z W_ LL F- U U) I U H O J Q CL LU z LU J Q 1� _ liVti i 1 t l�ili {V tIU ?if��1 t {6 } t}1t 1 � t r r $ u ;S `��% ,t 1 i t t e r- .f, t, j U , i 1i ri�f� l f2iiIZI1 ; rft4 f � S� Milt irr 3 t e 11 y�s �p n i� II it 10-6-1 Market Street Corridor Stud . ....... . . . . . ... ...... . ... . ... . ... . ....... . ........ These improvements should-be coordinated with on cit count and MPO studies to ensure that [ �roper connections are provided to proposed I reenwa y s, bike paths, and nei routes. B �crovidin these essentia-I connections, vehicular f.,emands on Market Street can be reduced, reducin Lon and increasin pedestrian, c and motorist safet.,�.' |O7| Conceptual renderin of B'sidewalk alon Market Street Table of Permitted Uses R o Permitted Uses 15 &1 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing Agricultural Uses P P Kennels S Veterinaries Wholesale Nurseries & Greenhouses (12/13/82) P P Construction General Building Contractor Landscaping Contractors (12/13/82) Special Trade Contractors Special Trade & General Contractors with no Outside Storage Transportation, Communication, Utilities Bus & Taxi Terminals (2/14/82) Commercial Marina with Floating Structures (4/2/84) P Commercial Marina S Dry Stack Storage of Boats: (1/7/08) As a stand -alone warehouse As accessory to a marina S Electric / Gas & Sanitary Services P P Electric Substations S P Mini - Warehouses Post Offices Telephone & Telegraph Facilities P P TV & Radio Broadcasting Warehousing Water Transportation Facilties Other Communication Facilities Including Towers S Antenna & Towers Less Than 70 Ft. In Height & P P Ancillary To The Principal Use (2/5/96) Cellular & PCS Antennas (See Section 69.17 (H)) P P Amateur Radio Antennas (Up to 90 ft.) (10/07) P P Wholesale Trade Wholesaling With No Outside Storage (11/2/81) Wholesaling Seafood With Water Frontage Retail Trade Automobile Service Station Automobile Dealers & Truck Sales Boat Dealers ART V * RFMU - See Section 59.9 for Permitted Uses Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -8 -1 Table of Permitted Uses Building Material & Garden Supplies Retail Trade (Continued) Convenience Food Store S S Drug Store Neighborhood Drug Store P Eating and Drinking Places Entertainment Establishments, Bars, and Cabarets, Discos R 0 Permitted Uses 15 &1 Entertainment Establishments, Bars, Cabarets ina Shopping Center Farm Implement Sales Food Stores Fruit & Vegetable Stand Produced on Same Parcel as Offered for P Furniture, Home Furnishing & Equipment General Merchandise Stores Handcrafting Small Articles Hardware Landscaping Service Miscellaneous Retail Mobile Home Dealers & Prefabricated Buildings (5/6/85) Retail Nurseries Historic Restaurant S Financing, Insurance, Real Estate Banks, Credit Agencies, Savings & Loans P Services Bed and Breakfast Inn (6/5/06) S S Automobile /Boat Repair Sales Automobile Rentals Barber / Beauty Shop (10/90, 7/10/06) P Business Services Including Printing P Camping, Travel Trailer Trailer Parks (2/14/83) S Drive -In Theatre Dry Cleaning /Laundry Plant Electrical Repair Shop Equipment Rental & Leasing Funeral Home P Golf Courses P Hotels & Motels Indoor and Outdoor Recreation Establishments (2/14/82, 8/16, 04) S Indoor Theatre Parks & Recreation Area (4/2/07) P P Personal Services Resort Hotel /Motel Stables P ART V * RFMU - See Section 59.9 for Permitted Uses Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -8 -2 Table of Permitted Uses Watch, Clock, Jewelry Repair Health Adult Day Care S P Children's Day Care (12/13/82) S P Community Center S Hospitals S P Nursing & Personal Care Facilities S P Residential Care (9/8/81) P P Educational Services Colleges, Universities, Professional Schools & S P Technical Institutions R 0 Permitted Uses 15 &1 Elementary & Secondary Schools P P Libraries P P Museums (5/2/83) P Membership Organizations Churches P P Labor Organizations P Lodges, Fraternal & Social Organizations (5/2/83) S P Fraternities / Sororities, Residential P Other Accessory Buildings or Uses, clearly incidental to P P the Permitted Use or Building (see Section 62) Cemeteries S Christmas Tree Sales (7/6/92) P Cruises, Carnivals, Fairs & Side Shows of No More than P 30 Days Duration Per Year Community Boating Facility S Private Residential Boating Facility P Demolition- Landscape Landfill P P Duplexes P Dwelling Unit Contained within Principal Use (4/85) Evangelistic and Religious Assemblies not P P conducted at a Church (7/6/92) Government Offices & Buildings S P High Density Development (3/22/82) Permitted only S S within Urban Transition Area (2/16/87, 10/11/95) Home Occupation P Mobile Home P Mobile Home, Doublewide P Mobile Home Parks S Mobile Home Subdivision S Offices for Private Business & Professional Activities P Outdoor Bazaars excluding Yard Sales (7/6/92) P P Pumpkin Sales (7/6/92) 1 P ART V * RFMU - See Section 59.9 for Permitted Uses Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -8 -3 Table of Permitted Uses Principal Use Sign P Research Facilities Other (Continued) Senior Living: Continuing Care Retirement Community or Life S S Care Community (11/10/08) Single Family Dwelling P P Single Family Dwelling- Attached (1/4/82) P P Special Fund Raising for Non - Profit Organizations P P Temporary Sign P P Recycling Facilities: (1/3/89) Small Collection S S Large Collection S S Large Collection with Processing ART V * RFMU - See Section 59.9 for Permitted Uses Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -8 -4 �M A X� P zn 14, ld 4, `Q 964 t ft W 4Z . ..... mcl gar 6-1 0 12- S, 11Z N1 1 X ca g OFFICE PARK SHELUING PROPERTIES INC. '7641 2 2 9 w q "M su r °: �z 7 _0 �M A X� P zn 14, ld 4, `Q 964 t ft 0 x q5 T 5 1 . m V co 15 Z 0 A ' LO M 0 0 z zi -H, Ic" 'A 4) pi i, S?, , E 5 7, m s -4 > A § n j - A SA K Im, t o i4 R 5 M T c 31 A 2 p A m a cz) (n M ; 4 , 4 V �4 rn A 0 9 p 1 A' 4 p z� fq � 1 W V 0A 81 8 �v -4 A _2 2 p, W 4Z . ..... S2 f 9, U2 S, �41 g OFFICE PARK SHELUING PROPERTIES INC. '7641 2 9 ip R" 8C , �z Wl LM I N GTON NC Board of MANHWatwiNAUAin CONDITIONAL DIISTRICT REZONING P z m, > iz � -- *^ . � - :m...,�°", - i ,'1 , f,A.MES f�. ,m. a 0 x q5 T 5 1 . m V co 15 Z 0 A ' LO M 0 0 z zi -H, Ic" 'A 4) pi i, S?, , E 5 7, m s -4 > A § n j - A SA K Im, t o i4 R 5 M T c 31 A 2 p A m a cz) (n M ; 4 , 4 V �4 rn A 0 9 p 1 A' 4 p z� fq � 1 W V 0A 81 8 �v -4 A _2 2 p, T ors m S2 f 9, PROJECT CLIENT WICKER g OFFICE PARK SHELUING PROPERTIES INC. '7641 2 9 8 0 MARKETS-TREE',"T 8600 BALD EAGLE LANE Wl LM I N GTON NC Board of MANHWatwiNAUAin CONDITIONAL DIISTRICT REZONING P z m, > °�"� .:s; .W -. � -- *^ . � - :m...,�°", - i ,'1 , f,A.MES f�. ,m. a m lei U 'r Al lag l k 04 rq > [10 > 1 -4 A1 r79' 171 rl C3 F-6 �m N r-� 511 M; M @ 1 m P31 rp z M, -e, I rn — � All 21 5 Q g A ' ��...�s�"° d w:,r w s,u °, 2 P'� `� � r'` i ' d , � U F W v � e n u s rr p, . . ... . .... q )yj C, L w —j e. n i n v 7f EJ N 1 3: <1 'j -4 g A fix " ;76 A m:ww"m, 0 x q5 T 5 1 . m V co 15 Z 0 A ' LO M 0 0 z zi -H, Ic" 'A 4) pi i, S?, , E 5 7, m s -4 > A § n j - A SA K Im, t o i4 R 5 M T c 31 A 2 p A m a cz) (n M ; 4 , 4 V �4 rn A 0 9 p 1 A' 4 p z� fq � 1 W V 0A 81 8 �v -4 A _2 2 p, T ors m S2 f 9, PROJECT CLIENT WICKER g OFFICE PARK SHELUING PROPERTIES INC. '7641 2 9 MARKETS-TREE',"T 8600 BALD EAGLE LANE Wl LM I N GTON NC Board of MANHWatwiNAUAin CONDITIONAL DIISTRICT REZONING P z m, > C WICKER f,A.MES � � � �� \�� tip i�� t�� 8 � '�� l it io" IV ► 'E 1 11;1icole New Hanover Count Plannin & Inspections Department 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmin NC 28403 Telephone: ( 910 ) 798-7571 R �kem Conditional Use Zonin Application 7641 Market Street — Wicker Office Park Parcels R03614-005-008-000 & R03614-005-006-000 -TTe are submittin a conditional use zonin application on behalf of Shellin-',, Properties, Inc for Wicker Office Park, located at 7641 Market Street. I 71'e thank y ou for y our time and consideration with this matter. Please feel free to contact me with an q uestions or concerns. IN I Josh M1h POP rl,744%.. Agqnmaw n't" M, Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL USE ZONING DISTRICit 230 Government Center Driv�� Suite 110 Wilmin NC 28403 910-798-7165 phone 910-798-7053 '; m Petitioner Information Proper Owneos I different than PeNkner Subject Propertv 0 Name Owner Name Address Joshua W. Mihal Properti'es, Inc. 7641 Market Street Compan Owner Name 2 PareelED R0363.4-005-008-000 Mihal Land Desi PLLC R03614-005-006-00 Address --------------------- Address GIs NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONAL USE ZONING DISTRICit 230 Government Center Driv�� Suite 110 Wilmin NC 28403 910-798-7165 phone 910-798-7053 '; m Petitioner Information Proper Owneos I different than PeNkner Subject Propertv 0 Name Owner Name Address Joshua W. Mihal Properti'es, Inc. 7641 Market Street Compan Owner Name 2 PareelED R0363.4-005-008-000 Mihal Land Desi PLLC R03614-005-006-00 Address --------------------- Address 330 Militar Cutoff Road, Suits A-3 8600 Bald Ea Lane Ci State, Zi ----------------- ----------------------- Cit p y , State, Zi Existin Zonin and Use W/1 Imin 28405 Willmiln NC 28403 R Phone Phone Proposed Zonin and Use ---------------- (910) 392-4355 910-686-5588 0&1 Email ------------------------------- - - fg Land Classification j osh @ Mihal y Land.net Transi ion PLEASE READ ALL OF SECTION 59.7 OF THE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE PRIOR TO SUBMITTIN't'; YOUR APPLICATION! I Petitions must be reviewed b Plannin & Zonin for completeness prior to acceptance. For petitions involvin iive (5) acres oi- less, a fee of $500.00 Will be char for those of g reater than five ( 5 ) acres a fee of $600.00 will be char This fee, pa to New Hanover Count MUST accompan this petition. �-77777771K Petitions for conditional chan of zonin are first referred to the New Hanover Count Plannin Board and then actei, upon b the New Hanover Count Board of Commissioners. Complete petitions and all supplementar information must be accepted b Plannin & Zonin twent (20) workin, 0 V ta before the Plannin Board meetin to allow ade time for processin and advertisement as re b the North &,I �.Mlia General Statutes. Omflmm Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-2 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 SITE PLAN CHECKLIS e ction 59.7. Ion Check each item to confirm that 'is 'Included, The application will not be deemed complete without all items bein addressed. Petitioner and/o, Owner 011 -=*"' Print INGme 117W Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-5 : ]? Nease note that for q uaslo- j udicial proceedin either the land owner or an attorne must represent the case at its public hearin The undersi owner jameEi Wicker (Shellin Prop.) does hereb appoint On- 4 1 - - - (Print or T as his/herfits exclusive a for the purpose of pefitionm' New (Print or T Hanover Count for a variance, special use P ennit, conditional use district, and/or an appeal of staff decisions applicable to the propert described 'in the attached petition. This a a shall continue M' effect until written notice of revocation b the owneri's delivered to New Hanover Count This the 8th da of Ma - 20 1,-j Board of Commissioners Meeting AAA 04/10 07/02/2012 10-10-6 Taken from New Hanover Count GIS Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-7 7641 Market Street - Tax Map March Taken from New Hanover Count GIS Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 10 -10 -8 Bein a tract of hmd locatedin Hametit ToNkinship, New HL.uiovi�r Coun.-L Carolina 11 butin more partieWarl uescfibed as be ui an ren rod I the westem,, i } $ of wa of Market. Street (I J.S. iliprhwa -4 17 — 100" public rhirlit of wa tr Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-9 Ib 0. 1 --u parcels of land and 's not to I , 'dsxiad to Pri�parer's not This desen"ption is o. �'t% Do c0i]SI be a recombination of those parcels. Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-10 Ma 8, 2012 i he Sunshine List I J"thrist's Sanctified Hol Church u 7517 Market Street Wilmin NC 28411 Michael Brumse and Kimberl Ben 114 Greenview Drive Wilmin NC 28411 Teresa Bi 7607 Bertha Road Wilmin NC 28411 CoastaH'" 7721 Alexander Road Wilmin NC 28411 107 Marshal Court, LLC 107 Marshall Court Wilmin NC 28411 7643 Market Street, LLC 7643 Market Street Wilmin NC 28411 Ba Estates, lnc-. 7622 Market Street Wilmin NC 28411 See Attached Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-11 IF Board of Commissioners Meetin 07/02/2012 10-10-12 Traffic Impact Worksheet Prior to submission of nonresidential site plan, this worksheet must be prepared. A. Traffic Impact Analysis will he required for all projects generating .100 peak hour trips or more. The scope of the TIA shall be determined by concurrence of the Planning Director, the MPO coordinator and N DOT traffic engineer. Any mitigation measures required must be included in the final site plan submitted for review. PROJECT NAME "]lays "4tKFr-*T S�t¢f�f /WiGl�K V 1CV 9AwtLC. PROJECT ADDRESS '7(,x[1 tun2kF.7 S TV rf i� DEVELOPER /OWNER!AMLlNGToN �Wc EXISTING ZONING YZ *%Is GROSS FLOOR AREA 114, HO v sq. ft. NEAREST INTERSECTION (,�� V i fc.K1 V#e* WE BEFORE PROPOSED PROJECT Average Daily Traffic (Date) +C7 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) � ITE MANUAL TRAFFIC GENERATION ESTIMATE: *1TE Manual available at Planning Department USE AND VARIABLES: �itQt- �sto�Nac.. c>AFiM (Example: Racquet Club; 8 courts; Saturday peaks) AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 'Z? PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ZI (Traffic generation of 100 peak hour trips will require Traffic Impact Analysis Scoping meeting with Planning Department) 3oSftP Person Providing Estimate BOTH Peak Hour estimate confirmed by Panning & Zoning on (Date) By This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: July 2, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 11 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Wanda Copley, County Attorney CONTACT(S): Wanda Copley, County Attorney SUBJECT: Consideration of Including Language to Address Undocumented Workers in County Contracts BRIEF SUMMARY: Commissioner Catlin has identified a possible need to address undocumented workers employed by contractors /subcontractors. The proposed language would require contractors /subcontractors to verify the eligibility of their employees and provide appropriate documentation at the County's request. New Hanover County has previously addressed this issue in its contracts, but not as extensively as this provision. The provision to be added to County contracts is as follows: Documented Workers. Contractors and Sub - Contractors shall verify their employees' identity and eligibility to work and provide services in complete compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act. Documentation establishing compliance must be made available upon request from County. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Consider proposed additional language. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Consider proposed additional language. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: The item was removed from the agenda. Board of Commissioners Meeting 07/02/2012 11 -0