The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 2012 08-20New Hanover County, North Carolina L I NIOIO�Ook August 20, 2012 Agenda Mission New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow. Vision A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come. Core Values Integrity • Accountability • Professionalism • Innovation • Stewardship This page intentionally left blank. AGENDA M&A NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC TED DAVIS, JR., CHAIRMAN • JONATHAN BARFIELD, JR., VICE - CHAIRMAN JASON R. THOMPSON, COMMISSIONER • BRIAN M. BERGER, COMMISSIONER • RICHARD G. CATLIN, COMMISSIONER CHRIS COUDRIET, COUNTY MANAGER • WANDA COPLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY • SHEILA SCHULT, CLERK TO THE BOARD AUGUST 20, 2012 9:00 A.M. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman Ted Davis, Jr.) NON - SECTARIAN INVOCATION (Reverend John McLaughlin, St. Jude Metropolitan Community Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Commissioner Jason R. Thompson) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Ratification of New Hanover County Financing Corporation Appointment to Fill Vacancy 3. Approval of Contract with New Hanover County Schools with an Additional $93,500 in Funding 4. Approval of Healthy Communities Grant Funding 5. Approval of a Personal Health Services Grant Application to Delta Dental of NC to Place Two Mobile Dental Unit Hook -Ups at Local Public Schools (Mary C. Williams Elementary and Castle Hayne Elementary) 6. Approval to Accept Sub -Grant Award from the Nature Conservancy 7. Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between New Hanover County and Brunswick County 8. Acceptance of Collection Settlement Reports 9. Adoption of Budget Amendments ESTIMATED REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS TIMES 9:10 a.m. 10. Presentation of Service Awards to Retirees and Employees and New Employee Introductions 9:25 a.m. 11. New Hanover County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Annual Update 9:35 a.m. 12. New Hanover County Planning Board Annual Update 9:45 a.m. 13. Presentation: Water Quality Monitoring in New Hanover County 10:15 a.m. 14. Consideration of Stormwater Ordinance Text Amendment to Support LID Incentive 10:30 a.m. 15. Consideration of Applying for Loan Assistance to Eliminate Failing Septic Tanks in Marquis Hills and Heritage Park Communities 10:45 a.m. 16. Consideration of Reappointment of Roger L. Kelley as Tax Administrator 10:50 a.m. 17. Consideration of Reappointment of Marion D. Harrell as Collector of Revenue and Charge of 2012 Levy 10:55 a.m. 18. Committee Appointments PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS limit three minutes Board o ommissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 11:10 a.m. 19. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney 11:20 a.m. 20. ADJOURN Note: Times listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 1 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Chairman Davis CONTACT(S): Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approve minutes from the following meetings: Agenda Review Meeting held on August 2, 2012 Regular Meeting held on August 6, 2012 Special Meeting held on August 9, 2012 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 1 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 2 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager CONTACT(S): Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney SUBJECT: Ratification of New Hanover County Financing Corporation Appointment to Fill Vacancy BRIEF SUMMARY: The Board of Directors for the New Hanover County Financing Corporation request that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners ratify the appointment of Chris Coudriet to fill the vacancy on the board created by Bruce Shell's resignation. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management • Deliver value for taxpayer money RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Ratify the appointment of Chris Coudriet as Director of the New Hanover County Financing Corporation to fill the vacancy. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 2 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 3 DEPARTMENT: Health PRESENTER(S): Bunny McClure, Assistant Finance Director CONTACT(S): Bunny McClure, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: Approval of Contract with New Hanover County Schools with an Additional $93,500 in Funding BRIEF SUMMARY: The New Hanover County Schools desires to continue its relationship with the Health Department through the provision of the School Health program. The contract for FY 13 reflects an increase of $93,500 over the adopted FY 13 budget. The total contract amount is $1,990,167. This funding includes additional revenue to the Health Department specifically designated for the provision of services by school nurses. These funds will increase five nurses that have been working 32 hours per week to 40 hours per week. These funds also allow for the addition of one temporary nurse at 32 hours per week. Should funds no longer be available to support this temporary position, it would be eliminated. No County matching funds are required and no new positions are being created. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Provide health and wellness education, programs, and services RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve funding provided by New Hanover County Schools for the School Health program and adopt the ordinance for associated budget amendment 13 -024 in the amount of $93,500. ATTACHMENTS: B/A 13 -024 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 3 -0 AGENDA: August 20, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 13 - 024 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 13 -024 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education Strategic Objective(s): Provide health / wellness education, programs, and services Fund: General Fund Department: Health /School Health Expenditure: Decrease Increase Health/School Health: Salaries and Wages $93,500 Total $0 1 1 $93 Revenue: Decrease Increase Health/School Health: NHC Schools Contribution for School Health $93,500 Total $0 $93 Section 2: Explanation The New Hanover County Schools has increased the FY12 -13 Health Department contract by $93,500 to fund additional hours for six School Nurses for the School Health program. No County matching funds are required and no new positions are being created. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 13 -024, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 20th day of August, 2012. (SEAL) Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 3 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 4 DEPARTMENT: Health PRESENTER(S): Joshua Swift, Deputy Health Director CONTACT(S): Joshua Swift, Deputy Health Director SUBJECT: Approval of Healthy Communities Grant Funding BRIEF SUMMARY: The NC Chronic Disease and Injury/Physical Activity and Nutrition Branch's Healthy Communities program seeks to address the risk factors of physical inactivity and poor nutrition. This additional funding is to support implementing evidence -based strategies to promote policy, systems and environmental change that support active living and healthy eating in New Hanover County. No matching County funds are required and no new positions are requested. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Provide health and wellness education, programs, and services RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the Health Communities Grant funding and adopt the ordinance for associated budget amendment 13 -025 in the amount of $6,206. ATTACHMENTS: B/A 13 -025 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 4 -0 AGENDA: August 20, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 13 - 025 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 13 -025 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education Strategic Objective(s): Provide health / wellness education, programs, and services Fund: General Fund Department: Health /Health Promotions Expenditure: Decrease Increase Health/Health Promotions: Supplies $6,206 Total 1 $0 11 $6 Revenue: Decrease Increase Health/Health Promotions: Grant - State - NC Health & Human Services $6,206 Total $0 $6 Section 2: Explanation The Health Department has received a $6,206 grant award from the North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services, Physical Activity and Nutrition Branch, to address the risk factors of physical inactivity and poor nutrition. This funding will support evidence -based strategies to promote policy, systems and environmental change for active living and healthy eating in New Hanover County. No matching funds are required and no new positions are requested. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 13 -025, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 20th day of August, 2012. (SEAL) Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 4 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Carla Turner, Personal Health Services Manager CONTACT(S): Carla Turner, Personal Health Services Manager SUBJECT: Approval of a Personal Health Services Grant Application to Delta Dental of NC to Place Two Mobile Dental Unit Hook -Ups at Local Public Schools (Mary C. Williams Elementary and Castle Hayne Elementary) BRIEF SUMMARY: Delta Dental of NC (Delta Dental) is a nonprofit dental service corporation created in 1977 to provide dental benefits plans throughout the state. Delta Dental's Smile for Kids grants are designed to promote children's oral health in NC. Of particular interest are programs designed to promote /improve the oral health of underserved children in at -risk populations. The Miles of Smiles Mobile Dental Unit (MDU) is a state -of- the -art dental office on wheels that provides comprehensive dental care to school age children in New Hanover and Brunswick Counties who do not have an accessible or established dental home. Presently, the MDU serves seven public schools in New Hanover County. A mobile dental unit hook -up is an electrical hook -up, installed by Progress Energy, in conjunction with the school system, that will allow our Mobile Dental Unit to park at the school for several weeks to provide dental care for the children. The hook -up is where we get the electricity to run all of the equipment, etc. on the unit. If received, this $5,000 will be used to place MDU hook -ups at two more schools, Mary C. Williams Elementary and Castle Hayne Elementary (also allowing access to Holly Shelter Middle School students). No County matching funds are required and no new positions are being created. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Provide health and wellness education, programs, and services RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approval of application for Delta Dental Smile for Kids Grant in the amount of $5,000. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 5 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 6 DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager CONTACT(S): Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Approval to Accept Sub -Grant Award from the Nature Conservancy BRIEF SUMMARY: At their July 11, 2011 meeting, the Board of Commissioners approved a request for the County to partner with the Southeast North Carolina Coastal Plain office of the Nature Conservancy to submit a grant application to the North American Wetlands Conservation Act ( NAWCA) in order to protect 772 acres of wetlands and adjacent uplands in the southeast coastal plan. The Nature Conservancy was awarded the grant and has requested to issue a sub -grant in the amount of $110,509 to New Hanover County for the purchase of a tract of land within the unincorporated area of the County that was included in the original proposal. The subject property is 10.2 acres and is known as the "Ramsay Tract." This tract of land is included within the proposed Smith Creek Greenway and is adjacent to two other properties purchased by the County. The County submitted an application to the Clean Water Management Trust Fund ( CWMTF) in early 2011 for the Ramsay Tract, however, the CWMTF was not able to fund acquisition projects in 2011. No cash match is required from the County for this project. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Innovate programs to protect the environment RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Accept grant and approve related budget amendment. ATTACHMENTS: NAWCA Subgrant NAWCA Financials Smith Creek Greenway Map B/A 13 -030 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 6 -0 COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 6 -0 SUBAWARD between THE NATURE CONSERVANCY and NEW HANOVER COUNTY a U.S. Subrecipient Cost Center # 2330709046 -0012 Subaward # FWS NHC 070112 CFDA # 15.623 The Nature Conservancy, a non - profit corporation organized under the laws of the District of Columbia with a local address of 4705 University Drive, Suite 290 Durham, NC 27707 herein referred to as "TNC," and New Hanover County, hereinafter referred to as the " Awardee," enter into this Subaward Agreement on August 20, 2012 upon the following terms and conditions. As used herein, "Subaward" shall refer to this Subaward Agreement # FWS NHC 070112 and all its attachments and incorporations. "Prime Award" shall refer to the North American Wetland Conservation Act (NAWCA) Grant, #F 12AP00414, between the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and TNC for implementation of the Southeastern North Carolina Wetlands Initiative II signed on May 21, 2012. Notwithstanding the foregoing, USFWS is not a party to this Subaward and has assumed no obligation directly to the Awardee. SECTION I - PURPOSE TNC and Awardee (collectively, the "Parties ") enter into this Subaward to collaborate on a project to permanently protect palustrine wetlands in the Southeastern Coastal Plain of North Carolina. More specifically to acquire a 10.19 acre tract ( "Ramsay ") located along Smith Creek in New Hanover County. SECTION II- TERM OF SUBAWARD This Subaward shall begin on August 20, 2012 ( "Commencement Date ") and shall expire on May 21, 2014 ( "Expiration Date "), unless further extended by amendment of the Subaward, which shall be in writing and signed by all Parties to this Subaward. Pre -award costs not allowed. Unless otherwise stated, expenditures for costs incurred prior to the start date or after the end date will be disallowed. SECTION III - AMOUNT OF SUBAWARD The Awardee shall receive an amount not to exceed $110,508.75 in USFWS funds and an amount not to exceed $0 in TNC funding. The Awardee will provide a total of $2,875 in cash or in -kind match for activities implemented, for a total project amount not to exceed $113,383.75. Funds associated with this Subaward may not be used as match to other U.S. Federal financial assistance. In the absence of a formal amendment to this Subaward, TNC shall not be obligated to reimburse the Awardee for costs that are in excess of this amount. The Awardee is authorized to reallocate funds between cost categories up to 10% of the total approved budget. Revisions in excess of this limit require prior written permission from TNC. TNC's Project Manager and Grants Specialist must be informed in writing of all reallocations. SECTION IV - SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this Grant is to fund Awardee's acquisition of the Ramsay Tract ( "Program ") as described in the attached workplan and budget ( "Attachment A "). Rev. 11 /07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 1 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -1 If any of the activities are to be performed on land that is owned by neither the Awardee nor the Conservancy, the Awardee shall be responsible for obtaining the landowner's prior permission before entering upon such land. SECTION V — REPORTS Awardee shall submit the financial report(s) and programmatic report(s) as follows: 1. Narrative Technical Report on progress toward accomplishment of specific objectives. The report shall include: Activities undertaken under the project Problems experienced /changes anticipated Description of activities anticipated during the next reporting period 2. Financial Report on Funds Expended using the approved report format (Attachment B, as updated annually). The report will also include detail on actual costs for the subject period and project -to -date, which should be compared to the budget. Final Technical Report summarizing the key activities and accomplishments throughout the project period. Report must include a summary of the Program's successes and /or failures, a general description of the program activities, a description of the methods of work used, and comments and recommendations regarding any unfinished work, program continuation, and direction. Copies of any publications not previously provided should accompany the final technical report. The final technical report must be so designated and submitted to TNC no later than 30 (thirty) calendar days after expiration of the Subaward. 4. Final Financial Report using approved report format which outlines how the Subaward and matching funds were used. The final financial report must be so designated and submitted to TNC no later than 10 (ten) calendar days after expiration of the Subaward. REPORTING DUE DATES Narrative Technical Reports June 30, 2013 Financial Reports Quarterly, e.g. no later than 10 calendar days after the quarter ends Final Technical Report No later than 10 (ten) calendar days after the Expiration Date Final Financial Report No later than 30 (thirty) calendar days after the Expiration Date All Narrative Technical Reports (including the Final Narrative Technical Report) and Published Materials shall be signed by the Awardee's Project Manager and submitted to TNC's Project Manager at the address specified in Section VIII "Project Managers and Administrative Representatives." All Financial Reports (including the Final Financial Report) shall be signed by the Awardee's Project Manager and submitted to TNC's Grants Specialist at the address specified in Section VIII "Prof ect Managers and Administrative Representatives." SECTION VI - PAYMENT PROVISIONS 1. The Awardee shall separately account for payments received under this Subaward in its accounting records. 2. Disbursements shall be made to the Awardee on a bi- annual basis upon receipt of a complete and accurate financial report, representing actual expenses, cash balance, and projected expenses, using the Financial Report template (Attachment B, as updated annually) Rev. 11/07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 2 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -2 3. Reimbursement payments will be sent to the Awardee by check payable to the Awardee. SECTION VII — INTEREST Interest amounts earned on Subaward funds of up to $250 per year may be retained by Awardee for administrative expenses. Interest amounts including and exceeding $250 must be either (a) added to Subaward funds and used to further eligible project activities, or (b) deducted from the total project cost in determining the net allowable project costs. Option (a) shall apply automatically unless there are no additional approved project expenses, in which case option (b) shall apply. SECTION VIII - PROJECT MANAGERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPRESENTATIVES The TNC representatives for this project are: Dan Ryan for Project Manager, Program Director 2807 Market St. Wilmington, NC 28403 910 - 395 -5000 dryangtnc . org Becky Stinson TNC's Grants Specialist for administrative matters: Senior Grants Specialist 144 Livingston Circle, Prattville, AL 36066 (334) 491 -4519 bstinsongtnc.org The Awardee's representatives for this proj ect are: Shawn Ralston for Project Manager: Planning Manager 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7444 SRalstongnhcgov.com SECTION IX - AWARD ADMINISTRATION All grant expenditures must be made in accordance with U.S. Grant Administration Standards September 2010 As Amended for the North American Wetlands Conservation Act and Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act The cost allowability requirements in 2 CFR Part 225 are incorporated by reference. SECTION XI - TITLE TO AND USE OF EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES If the purchase of equipment and supplies is supported under this subaward, the Conservancy will provide separate written instructions to the Awardee regarding acquisition and disposition prior to such purchase SECTION XII - TITLE TO AND USE OF REAL PROPERTY If the purchase of an interest in real property is supported under this Subaward, TNC will provide separate written instructions to the Awardee regarding acquisition, use, and disposition in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. SECTION XIII - ACCOUNTS, AUDITS AND RECORDS The Awardee agrees to maintain books, records, documents and other evidence pertaining to all costs and expenses incurred and revenues acquired under this Subaward (collectively "Records ") to the extent and in such detail as will Rev. 11 /07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 3 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -3 properly reflect all costs and expenses for which reimbursement is claimed. Unless extended by TNC, these records shall be maintained for a period of three years after the final financial report is submitted and approved by TNC. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Awardee agrees to maintain all Records for equipment purchased with Subaward funds for three years after the final disposition of such equipment. The Awardee shall provide timely and unrestricted access to its books and accounts, files and other records for inspection, review and audit by TNC, USFWS, and its authorized representatives. If TNC disallows any costs claimed by the Awardee related to this Subaward, the Awardee shall be responsible for reimbursing TNC for any of those costs related to the work the Awardee has performed. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration of this Subaward. SECTION XIV — ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Awardee agrees to acknowledge USFWS and TNC's support of the project, including funding contributions and sponsorship, on all information relating to the Subaward as follows: "This project was made possible through support provided by the USFWS and The Nature Conservancy, under the terms of the North American Wetland Conservation Act (NA WCA) Grant, 4F12AP00414. The content and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the USFWS or The Nature Conservancy, and no official endorsement should be inferred. " The term "Information" includes, but is not limited to, news releases, articles, manuscripts, speeches, trade association proceedings, symposia. SECTION XV - REQUIRED ASSURANCES & CERTIFICATIONS By signing this Subaward, the Awardee is providing the following assurances and certifications. In the event that any material misrepresentation in these assurances and certifications is discovered during the term of this Subaward, the Awardee or TNC may elect to declare this Subaward null and void and immediately terminate it. In the case of an intentional material misrepresentation, TNC may, at its option, recover damages resulting from the termination. Notice of termination shall be given to Awardee's address listed for the Awardee's Project Manager in Section VIII "Project Managers and Administrative Representatives." The Awardee shall require that the language of these certifications be included in the award documents for all subawards under this Subaward and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 1. NON - DISCRIMINATION. To the extent that such laws apply to Awardee, Awardee agrees to abide by U.S. laws with regard to non- discrimination of U.S. citizens or legal residents working under this Subaward on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, handicap or age. 2. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS The Awardee certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it is not presently and will not be debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment or declared ineligible for the award of subcontracts, by any U.S. Government agency, in accordance with federal regulations (53 Fed.Reg. 19161 - 19211) or has been so within the preceding three year period. The Awardee certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b. Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission Rev. 11/07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 4 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -4 of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph lb of this certification; and d. Have not within a three -year period preceding this application /proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. Where the Awardee is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, the Awardee must provide to TNC a written explanation prior to signing this Subaward. The Awardee further certifies that it will not become debarred, suspended or proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency during the term of this Subaward and it will not engage or contract for work under this Subaward with any such debarred or ineligible parties. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Awardee represents, warrants, and agrees that, in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Award: (a) the Awardee can lawfully work in the United States; (b) the Awardee shall obtain, at its own expense (except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this Award) any permits or licenses required for the Awardee's services under this Award; and (c) the Awardee shall comply with all statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, court orders, and other governmental requirements of the United States, the State of North Carolina, and any other jurisdiction(s) in which the Awardee is organized or authorized to do business, including but not limited to any applicable anti - bribery statutes, which are applicable to the work to be done by the Awardee under this Award (in each case, an "Applicable Law "). The Awardee shall not take any actions that might cause the Conservancy to be in violation of any of such Applicable Laws. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH ANTI - TERRORISM LAWS. The Awardee agrees that it will use any funds received under this Contract in compliance with all applicable antiterrorist financing and asset control laws, regulations, rules and executive orders, including, but not limited to the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and Executive Order 13224. 5. LOBBYING WITH FEDERAL FUNDS CERTIFICATION The Awardee certifies, to the best of the Awardee's knowledge and belief that: a. No U.S. Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by the Awardee or on behalf of the Awardee, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any U.S. Federal contract, the making of any U.S. Federal grant, the making of any U.S. Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any U.S. Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. b. If any funds other than U.S. Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection the underlying U.S. Federal award, the Awardee shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subj ect to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Rev. 11/07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 5 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -5 6. OTHER CERTIFICATIONS The Awardee certifies that the Awardee will not: a. Attempt to influence legislation or support lobbying within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code using any of the funds granted by the Conservancy; or b. Use any portion of these funds to participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office, to cause any private benefit to occur, or to take any other action inconsistent with Section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. XVI. P USE OF CONSERVANCY NAME /LOGO The Awardee may not use the Conservancy's name and /or logo in any way without prior written consent from the Conservancy, except to the extent the work performed contemplates their inclusion in the final work product. SECTION XVII - ASSIGNMENT This Subaward may not be assigned by the Awardee in whole or in part without the prior written consent of TNC. SECTION XVIII - SUBCONTRACTS AND SUBAWARDS Unless expressly set forth in the approved scope of work and budget, the Awardee may not subcontract or subaward any work in whole or in part without the prior written consent of TNC. If subcontracting /subawarding is permitted, please consult with the TNC Grants Specialist listed in Section VIII above to determine what provisions should be included in the subcontract /subaward. SECTION XIX - TERMINATION If at any time the Prime Award is terminated, this Subaward shall also be automatically terminated as of the termination date of the Prime award. Additionally, TNC shall have the right to terminate this Subaward by giving 30 (thirty) calendar days written notice to the Awardee of intent to terminate. Upon receipt of the termination notice from TNC, the Awardee shall take all necessary action to cancel outstanding commitments relating to the work under this Subaward. In the event of termination prior to the originally agreed upon expiration, TNC shall pay any obligations incurred by the Awardee that could not reasonably be canceled. SECTION XX - LIABILITY The Awardee shall be solely responsible for the payment of any and all claims for loss, personal injury, death, property damage, or otherwise, arising out of any act or omission of its employees or agents in connection with the performance of this work. To the extent permitted by law, the Awardee agrees to indemnify and hold TNC harmless from any and all claims, loss, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees through the appellate levels, made against or incurred by TNC arising out of work performed by the Awardee under this Subaward, or arising out of any act or omission of the Awardee attributable to the negligence of or contract breach by Awardee. SECTION XXI - APPLICABLE LAW This Subaward shall be interpreted, construed and governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina and such laws of the United States as may be applicable. In the event of any litigation over the interpretation or application of any of the terms or provisions of this Subaward, Conservancy and Awardee agree that litigation shall be conducted in the State of North Carolina. SECTION XXII - DUE DILIGENCE TNC may request copies of documents to ensure that Awardee meets the criteria of a non - profit conservation organization and that the Awardee meets appropriate standards of capacity, competence, and financial accountability. These documents include but are not limited to the following: a certificate of good standing, a list of the names of all of its board members and principal officers, copies of Awardee's bylaws and articles of incorporation. Awardee agrees to notify TNC immediately of any change in Awardee's corporate or tax status or operations, or if any official judicial, legislative, or administrative proceeding is instituted against Awardee that may affect the commitments and obligations agreed herein. Rev. 11/07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 6 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -6 SECTION XXIV - ENTIRE SUBAWARD, WAIVERS AND AMENDMENTS This Subaward constitutes the entire Subaward between TNC and the Awardee. No waiver, modification, or amendment of any of the terms or conditions stated herein shall be effective unless set forth in writing and duly signed by TNC and the Awardee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Subaward by their fully authorized officers. Chris Coudriet County Manager For New Hanover County Signature Title Date Katherine Skinner Executive Director For The Nature Conservancy Signature Title Date Grants Specialist approval: Via: Date: Legal approval: Via: Date: ❑ Attachment A: Workplan and budget, ❑ Attachment B: Approved financial reporting format Rev. 11/07 Board of Commissioners Meeting Page 7 of 7 08/20/2012 6 -1 -7 ATTACHMENT A - Work Plan and Budget Ramsay OVERALL ACRES AFFECTED: 10.19 acres LOCATION: - 77.8752 34.2715 STATE /FEDERAL AGENCIES HOLDING INTERESTS: NA Acreage Summary of Grant/Match Activities on the Tract: Acquisition: 10. 19 Restoration: Enhancement: Establishment: Describe all applicable grant /match activities occurring on the tract here: Grant funds will be used to acquire 10.19 acres of palustrine and riverine wetlands as well as associated uplands by New Hanover County using NAWCA funds. The county will incorporate the tract into a greenway for use as a publicly accessible recreation area. The property is currently privately held. Tract — Ramsay: Acquisition Budget Justification - $113,383.75 and 10.19 acres Grant - S110.508.75 Match - 2 7 Non -Match - $ Completion: July 2012 LAND ACQUISITION DISCLOSURE Type of acquisition: fee title Holder of NAWCA conservation interest: New Hanover County Grantor /Seller of conservation interest: Robert and Kristen Ramsay Tenure of conservation interest: Perpetuity All funding sources for acquisition: NAWCA grant funds Are mineral rights severed or included? Included Are water rights severed or included? Included Item & Work Units $ /unit Total $ Schedule (month, year) Funding Source (Grant or Partner name) APPRAISALS and OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS Appraisal 1 $2 $2 February, 2011 County Match Survey 1 $6 $6 August, 2012 NAWCA (Grant) Legal Fees, title work, closing costs 1 $2 $2 March, 2013 NAWCA (Grant) Fee Title 1 $100 Aril, 2013 NAWCA (Grant) Subtotal Appraisals and Other Acquisition Costs $111 NON - CONTRACT PERSONNEL and TRAVEL Land protection staff time: acquisition of grant tract, coordinating due diligence required ( *hourly rate includes 40% fringe benefits) 43 hours $50/43.175 $2 Ongoing till proj ect's completion Grant Subtotal Non - Contract Personnel and Travel $2 TOTAL ACQUISITION DIRECT COSTS $113 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 6 -2 -1 AGENDA: August 20, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 13 - 030 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 13 -030 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Productive Strategic Partnerships Strategic Objective(s): Develop appropriate public / private partnerships Collaborate on regional planning Fund: General Fund Department: Planning & Zoning Expenditure: Decrease Increase Planning & Zoning: Capital Outlay - Land Costs $110,509 Total 1 $0 11 $110 Revenue: Decrease Increase Planning & Zoning: Grant - Federal - Nature Conservancy $110,509 Total 1 $0 11 $110 Section 2: Explanation To budget grant award of $110,509 from the Nature Conservancy to purchase 10.2 acres, known as the "Ramsey Tract," located within the proposed Smith Creek Greenway and is adjacent to two other properties purchased by the County. There is an in -kind match of $2,875, but no cash match is required. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 13 -030, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 20th day of August, 2012. (SEAL) Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 6 -4 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 7 DEPARTMENT: Sheriff PRESENTER(S): Sheriff Ed McMahon CONTACT(S): Fonda Sykes, Administrative Support Specialist or Sheriff McMahon SUBJECT: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between New Hanover County and Brunswick County BRIEF SUMMARY: A Memorandum of Understanding must be executed between New Hanover County and Brunswick County as set forth in the terms and conditions for use of the equipment (boat and trailer) purchased with 2010 Port Security Grant Program funds. New Hanover County has agreed to distribute equipment to Brunswick County as part of the Cape Fear Maritime Task Force. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Increase public safety and crime prevention RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Authorize the County Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding between New Hanover County and Brunswick County. ATTACHMENTS: MOU - -NHC and Brunswick County COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 7 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT 413 -0045 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is entered into this the day of 2012 by and between NEW HANOVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina ( "New Hanover "); and the BRUNSWICK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina ( "Brunswick "). New Hanover and Brunswick are collectively referred to as "Parties." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the United States Department of Homeland Security has awarded funding under the FY2010 Port Security Grant Program MOA #7002 to the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office and New Hanover has agreed to distribute equipment to Brunswick County Sheriff's Office as part of the Cape Fear Maritime Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for mutual consideration as set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. New Hanover and Brunswick recognize that it would be in the mutual best interest of all parties, as well as, the furtherance of the public interest and advancement of public safety, to cooperate with the other in the 2010 Homeland Security, Port Security Grant Program, and further, to enter into an Equipment Allocation Agreement in which the Brunswick County Sheriff's Office shall take responsibility for the listed equipment, more specifically described in Schedule A attached thereto, and to make said equipment available for inspection by the Homeland Security Grants Manager. 2. New Hanover shall remain owner of the above referenced equipment. Upon completion of the grant, New Hanover may request permission from the United States to transfer ownership of the equipment to Brunswick. 3. Brunswick shall be responsible for the taxes, licenses, hull and equipment insurance in an amount equal to the attached equipment schedule, and protection and indemnity insurance or shall otherwise self- insure one (1) Silver Ships 25' twin Yamaha 200 HP with accessories H I N #VS 145100K111, and Trailer Serial #42XB262688113903. Page 1 of 4 dm Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 7 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT 413 -0045 4. While the referenced equipment is within the custody and control of the Brunswick, its officers, officials, employees and agents, shall exercise all reasonable, prudent care in maintaining and utilizing the personal property, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 5. Brunswick will fully cooperate with New Hanover in monitoring, complying, and submitting any property use documentation required under federal grant provisions, rules, and regulations. 6. This agreement may be terminated by either party hereto giving one hundred eighty (180) days written notice. Upon termination, Brunswick will return to New Hanover the referenced equipment. This the day of NEW HANOVER COUNTY (SEAL) County Manager ATTEST: Clerk to the Board BRUNSWICK COUNTY (SEAL) Brunswick County Manager ATTEST: Brunswick County Clerk This instrument has been pre - audited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. Approved as to form: New Hanover County Finance Director New Hanover County Attorney Page 2 of 4 dm Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 7 -1 -2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT 413 -0045 This instrument has been pre - audited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. Approved as to form: Brunswick County Finance Director Brunswick County Attorney NORTH CAROLINA NEW HAN OVE R NEW HAN OVE R I, , a Notary Public of the State and County aforesaid, certify that Sheila L. Schult personally came before me this day and acknowledged that she is Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County and that by authority duly given and as the act of the Board, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its County Manager, Chris Coudriet, sealed with its corporate seal and attested by herself as its Clerk. and official seal, this day of Notary Public My commission expires: NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF 1 , a Notary Public of the State and County aforesaid, certify that acknowledged that she is Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Brunswick County, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the Board, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its County Manager, sealed with its corporate seal and attested by herself as its Clerk. and official seal, this day of Notary Public My commission expires: Page 3 of 4 WITNESS my hand ) 2012. WITNESS my hand ) 2012. dm Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 7 -1 -3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT 413 -0045 EQUIPMENT ALLOCATION AGREEMENT do hereby accept, on behalf of, and representing the Brunswick County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff John W. Ingram V, the following listed property from the 2010 Homeland Security, Port Security Grant. The following property having been accepted by the aforementioned representative of the Brunswick County Sheriff's Office, will release New Hanover County and the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Edward J. McMahon and all employees thereof, from any responsibility and /or liability due to loss, damage or misuse of the listed items or bodily injury, or death or property damage arising out of the use of the listed items. Should the Department of Homeland Security audit the 2010 Homeland Security Port Security Grant, its equipment or services rendered with said equipment, Brunswick County Sheriff's Office will accept full responsibility for the listed and accepted equipment /assets, its condition or loss thereof. Furthermore, documentation shall be recorded, kept, and maintained should any loss or damage occur to the listed equipment, also in the event an audit should occur. The equipment accepted by the representative is more specifically described on the attached Schedule A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set out. Brunswick County Sheriff's Office Representative Page 4 of 4 dm Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 7 -1 -4 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 8 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Michelle Harrell, Collector of Revenue CONTACT(S): Roger Kelley, Tax Administrator SUBJECT: Acceptance of Collection Settlement Reports BRIEF SUMMARY: As required by NCGS 105 -373 the tax settlement for the 2011 levy is submitted to the Board for acceptance. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Accept the 2011 tax settlement. ATTACHMENTS: Collections Summary Collection Report for June 2012 Fire District Collection Report for June 2012 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY TAX DEPARTMENT 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 190 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1671 TELEPHONE (910)798 -7300 FAX (910) - 798 -7310 Collections Summary Tax Year 2011 Collection Rates Carolina Beach Kure Beach County Fire District Wrightsville Beach Wilmington Collection Stats Levy $4,377,809.77 $1,926,275.66 $159,891,037.89 $8,700,631.92 $3,283,176.29 $52,948,420.53 Collected Percent $4,319,537.95 98.67% $1,915,570.37 99.44% $157,582,860.32 98.56% $8,564,218.00 98.43% $3,263,948.95 99.41% $51,972,224.12 98.16% Roger L. Kelley Tax Administrator Jeffery Niebauer Asst. Tax Administrator Michelle Harrell Collector of Revenue New Hanover County ranked 4 when comparing the 10 largest counties by population statewide. The City of Wilmington ranked 3 rd when comparing the 10 largest cities by population statewide. Collection personnel negotiated and monitored approximately 900 payment agreements with citizens and business owners. When voluntary compliance is not achieved staff served the following legal notices: Bank Attachments — 740 Wage Garnishments — 532 We also enhanced our working relationship with the New Hanover County Sheriff's office by executing 38 property levies which resulted in collections of $156,517.16 We continued our participation in the NC Debt Set Off initiative resulting collection of $ 40,392.61 in delinquent taxes. Staff also collected and processed $9,016,245.00 in additional taxes for New Hanover County, Wilmington, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach and Wrightsville Beach: Business License- $56,737.88 Room Occupancy Tax - $8,235,643.87 Rental Vehicle Tax- $527,946.07 Heavy Equipment Tax- $195,918.18 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -1 -1 N V--1 O N O O 4 - Q aj fY O aj O V s O V �--I O � N i O LM 3 Z V N N \ N qLnI 00 w \ Ln 00 qLnI O M Ln qLn I 000 rn \ rl M V'�I O V i O O N O N LA i i . O a O O m m N Ln N tD 1� m Ln o0 M ,q m 6 tD rl N r-� r-� o ri un 00 M 0o a� � M to O � M N Ln I� N O o0 Ol N M _0 \ \ tD \ M \ r-I \ N \ M \ Ln au � O N 0) 00 rl 0) c: 0) rl 00 Ln ` N \ M E O rl M 1� N Ln �n �n U -ch-u)- ��qj)- U 0 o O N (.0 tDD M cn 1O - o q4 q4 Ln 4 r 9 i o W m� 0 N M 10 0 4 N M 06 O - 3 O m of M m F N au N Ol tD N M U 0O 1� M N M !E 00 1� rl 00 M N M 00 lD i./) iJ iJ iJ iJ)- iJ iJ 00 00 O 00 O 1� r 1� O 00 O 1� M tD >. 00 00 r-I Ql r-I N a--' 00 M M r-I O N Ol ✓ \ 1 \ 1 1 1� 0) 00 lD N r-I M M q* N N lD M 1� lD >. Ln N Ln o0 O lD rl i Ol 00 lD I� (N tD M oo m rn M O q* Q o0 00 O rl 4 4 r-I L O N M ri O ri ` 00 a r r*- N q * Ln a- - rl D_ O O ca rl rl rl Ln � Ln M tD O r M 9i o m V) tri r-� M 00 Ln 1� N tD Q_ - j Ol r-I 00 M 00 O �D 00 N M 0 0) 00 ri M O 00 Ln :* o0 06 r tri �6 �6 �6 m a) M (N 00 CY) N M M �C N O M u) tD q* Ln -ch'j 4 j) - 4 j - )- rl O M 00 Ln W lD tD rl rl 00 N a q* Ln 0) 0) rn Ln W N rl O M M � p r M ci ca 00 Ln Ln 0 �C N _ ' E � _ O V a, b-0 _ U ai aj 4A U O O •� LA � a�- u o OD � cn V O 0� O X O O iE E E 4 0 _ U 4-J U _ Z3 a a .� 0 4-J W u J O a a U O U N N \ N qLnI 00 w \ Ln 00 qLnI O M Ln qLn I 000 rn \ rl M V'�I O V i O O N O N LA i i . O a Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -2 -1 O N N -U 0 U� Ln O r-I -U O Ol 00 00 -V�I 0 o0 0 M O -V�I O V i 0 ILD O N M O r tD :::I 00 lD o0 ::I 6 tD rl N m' 11" r� Ln 00 M M Ln 1� m Ol I� M N 00 tD tD N M r O O M N N Ln 1� \ tD \ � \ N \ M E O U -ch-u)- ��qj)- qj)- 0 o O N (.0 tDD M M 1-� ' co� r 9 i o W m� 0 N W - 3 O M w 0) tD N N Ol tD N M N 1� Ln N L- 0 O i./) iJ iJ iJ iJ)- iJ iJ 00 00 N 00 O 1� r 1� O ::1 N 1� M tD >. 00 00 r-I Ql r-I N a--' 00 M M r-I O N Ol ✓ \ 1 \ 1 1 1 EL M M Ln M ri O N tD N M 01 CL \ N 1 N 1 rl O V) D_ Ln ri Ln M tD rn r M 9i o m o tri r-� M 00 Ln 1� ri tD - j Ol r-I 00 M 00 On a M M 00 V) W \ rl 1 rl c6 a) �C -ch'j 4 j) - 4 j - )- W M p M 00 Ln Ln 0 L N _ ' E _ O ai a- i = _ U ai aj U O O •� LA a a�- u o Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -2 -1 O N N -U 0 U� Ln O r-I -U O Ol 00 00 -V�I 0 o0 0 M O -V�I O V i 0 N i 4- i O CL GC O a- 0 s O 2 v D O L- 0 �--I O � N i O r LM 3 Z V Ln U. ILD N qLnI • M qLn I ON -un I O Ln V'�I O V i O O N O N LA i i . O a O lD 00 N O rl rl lD N Ln M Ln O RZI I-� Ol to m 06 ri 00 O M :::1 � lD M Ln M ri m w l::j Ln I:t 00 O lD N R::I 0) ::1 _0 M N O O9:4 O Ln lD O M Ln N O lb rl N rl I� I� Ln -' rl M E 00 00 00 R* E U 06 O -ch-u)- ��qj)- cn U I� M Ln M Ln m O M I� O lD Ln rl N rl N M I rl 00 00 00 00 N O Ln 00 00 00 Ol O Ol r� 4 00 00 N M R* N R* 00 M N m N I� -:* 00 N N rl I� M w O O I� Ol rl Ol M rl Ln o O 0) rn O Ln � O o0 lD lD 00 O 01 I* lD N 00 w I� I� N w L O 4 ::1 - r M qt 00 O N M Ln rn I:t N M (.D 0) 00 N T ,::I: M O lD N M 00 rl Ln a_ N rl 00 Ln o0 N M N O O w Ln ri O M Ln ri n CL 00 Ln N rl lD V) N o D_ 0 -Ln qj -� -Ln qj -� ca N N Ln rl w �p 00 00 N Ln O 9i O 4 r-� N Ln V) O Ol . O O . cl . 4-j � Ln Ln Ln 0) I� M O ::1 N 00 rn M Ln m U) lD 00 lD 4 M 4 lD 00 lD ::I lD R::I � a) . . M . 00 . 00 . a) . w � a I � m o w ca p M O 00 � �C Ln Ln 0 L N V O E 4A fu _ O ai +-i = _ U N � U O O •� LA a a�- U o OD � cn V O CU 0� O X O O iE E E -- 0 _ U 4-+ U _ 4-J Oj .� CA 4-J u O a a U O U Ln U. ILD N qLnI • M qLn I ON -un I O Ln V'�I O V i O O N O N LA i i . O a Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -3 -1 ro N N rn c� -U rn 00 O u) yw -U Ol Ql 0 -U kJO Ol T-4 -U O V i 0 00 00 O O tD tD 00 I-� Ol 00 00 N lD Ol O :::1 � � M 00 M N l::j Ln M �- o M N N ::1 (.0 00 O M lD N � M N rl rl E O U -ch-u)- ��qj)- qj)--un I� M Ln M Ln m O M I� O lD O Ol rl I lD I rl 00 Ln O M M N 00 00 O lD � Ln % - --, 00 . . rl . (-4 . � . � O O ::1 Ln O O 0) rn Ln Ln � O o0 lD lD tD M 01 I* lD N 00 w I� I� N w L O 4 ::1 - r M qt 00 O N M Ln r1 00 N CL O I� O N T O M O I� `-' M 00 Ln a_ N r cu O V) O D_ -Ln qj -� -Ln qj -� N N Ln rl w 00 00 N Ln O 9i 4 r-� N Ln O Ol . cl . O . cl . 4-j � Ln Ln w c6 lj -c.- 4j)- -ch 4j)- W M p M 00 Ln Ln 0 L N _ ' E _ O ai +-i = _ U N U O O •� LA a a�- U o Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 8 -3 -1 ro N N rn c� -U rn 00 O u) yw -U Ol Ql 0 -U kJO Ol T-4 -U O V i 0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 CONSENT ITEM: 9 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director CONTACT(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Amendments BRIEF SUMMARY: The following budget amendments amend the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. 2013 -08 - Sheriffs Office 2013 -09 - Sheriffs Office STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Strong Financial Performance • Control costs and manage to the budget RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adoption of the ordinance for the budget amendments listed. ATTACHMENTS: B/A 2013 -08 B/A 2013 -09 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 4 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 9 -0 AGENDA: August 20, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 2013 - 08 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 2013 -08 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education Strategic Objective(s): Increase public safety / crime prevention Fund: Federal Forfeited Property Department: Sheriffs Office Expenditure: Decrease Increase Federal Forfeited Property (FBI): Supplies $18,988 Federal Forfeited Property (DOJ): Supplies $45,564 Total $0 $64 Revenue: Decrease Increase Federal Forfeited Property (FBI): Federal Forfeited Property (FBI) $18,988 Federal Forfeited Property (DOJ): Federal Forfeited Property (DOJ) $45,564 Total $0 $64 Section 2: Explanation To budget Federal Forfeited Property (FBI) receipt of 7/31/12 for $18,988 and Federal Forfeited Property (DOJ) receipts of 7/16/12 and 7/31/12 for $45,564. Federal Forfeited Property funds are budgeted as received and must be used for law enforcement as the Sheriff deems necessary. The current balance in the Federal Forfeited Property fund is $81,866. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 2013 -08, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 20th day of August, 2012. (SEAL) ATTEST: Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 9 -1 -1 AGENDA: August 20, 2012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 2013 - 09 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment 2013 -09 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education Strategic Objective(s): Increase public safety / crime prevention Fund: Controlled Substance Tax Department: Sheriffs Office Expenditure: Decrease Increase Controlled Substance Tax: Supplies $10,513 Total $0 1 1 $10 Revenue: Decrease Increase Controlled Substance Tax: Controlled Substance Tax $10,513 Total $0 $10 Section 2: Explanation To budget Controlled Substance Tax receipt of 7/19/12 for $10,513. Controlled Substance Tax is budgeted as received and must be used for law enforcement as the Sheriff deems necessary. The current balance in the Controlled Substance Tax fund is $15,600. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 2013 -09, amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, is adopted. Adopted, this 20th day of August, 2012. (SEAL) Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 9 -2 -1 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 10 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): County Commissioners and Chris Coudriet, County Manager CONTACT(S): Libby Moore, Human Resources Analyst SUBJECT: Presentation of Service Awards to Retirees and Employees and New Employee Introductions BRIEF SUMMARY: Service awards will be presented to retirees and employees. New employees will be introduced and invited to have their photo taken with the Board of Commissioners to be placed on the County's website. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management • Hire, develop and retain talented people • Recognize and reward contribution • Create and support an engaged workforce RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Present service awards, recognize new employees and take photo. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Presented service awards, recognized new employee and took photo. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 10 -0 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 11 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Tommy Taylor, New Hanover County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Chairman CONTACT(S): Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: New Hanover County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Annual Update BRIEF SUMMARY: The New Hanover County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council will make its annual presentation to the Board of Commissioners. Attached is the information regarding this board. County Manager Chris Coudriet requests the Board appoint Assistant County Manager Avril Pinder as the County's designee for this Council as a continuation of his service while Assistant County Manager. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear presentation and appoint Assistant County Manager Avril Pinder as the County's designee. ATTACHMENTS: New Hanover County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Information COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Hear presentation. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Heard presentation and appointed Avril Pinder as the County's designee on this board by a vote of 4 -1, Commissioner Berger dissenting. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL Members: Representatives from the following categories: school superintendent or designee, police chief or designee, sheriff or designee, district attorney or designee, chief court counselor or designee, AMH /DD /SA director or designee, DSS director or designee, county manager or designee, substance abuse professional, member of faith community, county commissioner, 2 under age 18, juvenile defense attorney, chief district judge or designee, member of business community, health director or designee, United Way or other non - profit member, parks and recreation representative, and up to 7 at -large members appointed by County Commissioners. (Limited to no more than 26.) Terms: 2 -year terms (Changed from 3 year terms to reflect requirements of General Statutes) 9/06 Regular Meetings: Meetings are held seven times a year (3rd Friday at 12:30 p.m.) in Human Resources Training Room B in the New Hanover County Government Center, 230 Government Center Drive, Wilmington, NC. Statute or Cause Creating Task Force: NC General Assembly established JCPC on 12/21/98. Purpose: The JCPC is to assess, prioritize and identify ways to meet needs of youths who are at -risk of delinquency or who have been adjudicated, undisciplined, or delinquent; identify community risk factors; recommend allocation of state funding for youth programs that address these risk factors; and evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -1 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Business Community First 9/22/08 9/30/10 Joe Miller, Secretary/Treasurer Second 9/20/10 9/30/12 7103 Centallion Court Wilmington, NC 28411 538 -5639 (C) 796 -1022 (W) Faith Community First 9/20/10 9/30/12 Tanya Bell Millhouse 626 Tabor Lane Wilmington, NC 28405 297 -8224 (C) Juvenile Defense Attorney First 9/20/10 9/30/12 Charlotte Noel Fox 1504 Lamplighter Way Wilmington, NC 28403 395 -4798 (H) 815 -0085 (W) Under Age 18 (2 Students) Deshon Montrael Barfield First 9/21/09 9/30/11 1819 Ann Street Second 10/17/11 9/30/13 Wilmington, NC 28401 762 -3643 (H) 264 -1685 (C) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -1 JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL (CONT. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -2 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Noah W. Ponton First 11/15/10 9/30/12 4534 Noland Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 520 -3899 (H) 520 -8481 (C) Members -at -Large Abeeku Ankrah First 10/17/11 9/30/13 637 Tulane Drive Wilmington, NC 28403 632 -8472 (C) 274 -3497 (W) Kristen DeVall First 10/17/11 9/30/13 UNCW 601 S. College Road Wilmington, NC 28403 269 - 329 -8643 (C) 962 -2636 (W) Glenn W. Drew First 9/22/08 9/30/10 7421 Coker Court Second 10/18/10 9/30/12 Wilmington, NC 28411 681 -0463 (H) 470 -0646 (C) Ryan Estes First 9/21/09 9/30/11 715 North Fourth Street, Unit 301 Second 10/17/11 9/30/13 Wilmington, NC 28401 336 - 926 -2896 (C) 588 -4404 (W) Jake Hunt First 9/20/10 9/30/12 310 N. Front Street, Suite 4, #337 Wilmington, NC 28401 632 -9328 (H) 622 -5253 (C) Lyana Hunter First 10/17/11 9/30/13 P.O. Box 1971 Carolina Beach, NC 28428 297 -0480 (C) 251 -7090 (W) Cary D. McCormack First 10/17/11 9/30/13 1800 Elease Lane Wilmington, NC 28403 679 -4582 (H) 732 - 275 -7291 (C) Maryann K. Nunnally First 10/17/11 9/30/13 7804 -1 Blue Heron Drive, W. Wilmington, NC 28411 686 -2771 (H) 520 -7576 (C) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -2 JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL (CONY.) Revised: 8/2/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -3 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION County Commissioners' Designee Undesignated New Hanover County Assistant Manager 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 195 Wilmington, NC 28403 798 -7184 (W) Agency Representatives: District Attorney: Jason Smith Undesignated Judge of District Court: Judge JH Corpening Sheriff Department: Novella H. Frieslander Wilmington City Police: Melissa Moore Substance Abuse Center: Liz Uzcategui DSS: LaVaughn Nesmith/Wanda Marino Health Department: Maria Turnley Juvenile Justice / Courts: Robert Speight Southeastern Center: Amy Horgan, Vice -Chair Schools: Dr. Rick Holliday United Way: Tommy Taylor, Chairman NC JJ &DP Consultant: Jesse Riggs File: /JCPC 11/11 Revised: 8/2/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 11 -1 -3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 12 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Richard Collier, New Hanover County Planning Board Chairman CONTACT(S): Sheila L. Schult, Clerk to the Board and Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Department Director SUBJECT: New Hanover County Planning Board Annual Update BRIEF SUMMARY: The New Hanover County Planning Board will make its annual presentation to the Board of Commissioners. Attached is the information regarding this board. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear presentation. ATTACHMENTS: New Hanover County Planning Board Information COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Hear presentation. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Heard presentation. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 12 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Number of Members: 7 Term of Office: Three years Compensation: $20.00 per meeting Regular Meetings: First Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m. in the Assembly Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Wilmington, NC. Statute or cause creating Board: N. C. General Statutes 153A -321. New Hanover County Ordinance and Resolution establishing Planning Board dated September 2, 1980, for the purpose of planning and making recommendations in order that the elected and appointed officials of the County may competently perform their duties. Brief on the functions: Make studies of the County and surrounding areas; determine objectives to be sought in the development of the study area; prepare and adopt plans for achieving these objectives; develop and recommend policies, ordinances, administrative procedures, and other means for carrying out plans in a coordinated and efficient manner; advise the Board of Commissioners concerning the use and amendment of means of carrying out plans; exercise any functions in the administration and enforcement of various means for carrying out plans that the Board of Commissioners may direct; perform any other related duties that the Board of Commissioners may direct. Much of the Board's time is consumed with Land Use Planning, Zoning, and Growth Management Issues. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 12 -1 -1 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Richard M. Collier, Chairman Unexpired 5/21/07 7/31/09 3708 Needle Sound Way First 7/20/09 7/31/12 Wilmington, NC 28409 -2829 Second 7/23/12 7/31/15 790 -5769 (H) 520 -7754 (W) C. Andrew Heath, Jr. (Andy) First 7/21/08 7/31/11 3513 Aster Court Second 7/11/11 7/31/14 Wilmington, NC 28409 790 -4580 (H) 858 -1904 (W) 368 -9610 (C) Daniel Hilla, Vice - Chairman Unexpired 10/18/10 7/31/11 622 Timberlake Lane First 7/11/11 7/31/14 Wilmington, NC 28411 686 -4464 (H) 443 -4454 (W) Lisa Mesler First 7/23/12 7/31/15 4825 Castleboro Court Wilmington, NC 28411 297 -2171 (H) 793 -3903 (W) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 12 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD (CONY.) Revised 8/6/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 12-1-2 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Tamara Carter Murphy First 7/12/10 7/31/13 5105 Exton Park Loop Castle Hayne, NC 28429 623 -4011 (H) 251 -4048 (W) Anthony Prinz Unexpired 11/15/10 7/31/13 2116 Klein Road Wilmington, NC 28405 750 -2418 (C) David F. Weaver First 7/23/12 7/31/15 4929 Pine Street Wilmington, NC 28403 799 -9772 (H) 620 -7800 (W) Director: Chris O'Keefe File: /Planning Planning &Inspections Department B/C #24- 7.12 Planning Manager: Shawn Ralston 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 798 -7165 Revised 8/6/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 12-1-2 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 13 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager & Brad Rosov, Coastal Planning & Engineering CONTACT(S): Shawn Ralston, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Presentation: Water Quality Monitoring in New Hanover County BRIEF SUMMARY: New Hanover County contracts with Coastal Planning and Engineering (CP &E) to monitor water quality on seven creeks within the unincorporated area of the County. The creeks monitored include Barnards, Futch, Lords, Motts, Pages, Prince George and Smith Creek. At each monitoring station, water quality samples are collected and analyzed for biological, chemical and physical parameters. The purpose of the monitoring is twofold: 1) to protect public health, and 2) to gage the overall health of the creek and respond appropriately to declining trends in water quality. To further analyze data, County staff facilitate a quarterly meeting with a Water Quality Task Force to review and discuss County data, as well as other data monitored throughout New Hanover County. The purpose of this presentation is for County staff and CP &E staff to present data from the FY 11 -12 monitoring program and highlight enhancements that have been made to the FY 12 -13 program. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Innovate programs to protect the environment RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear presentation. e TT e C14XJF.NTC - FY 11 -12 Water Quality Monitoring Report COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Hear presentation. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Heard presentation. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM 2011 -2012 FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina, Inc. Marine Scientist: Brad Rosov, M. Sc. Prepared For: New Hanover County, North Carolina Recommended Citation: Rosov, B., 2012. New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Program: 2011 -2012 Final Report. New Hanover County, North Carolina: Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina, Inc. 57p. July 2012 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report represents the results of the New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Program between June 2011 and June 2012. Nineteen (19) monitoring stations within seven (7) creeks in New Hanover County were monitored on a monthly basis for physical, chemical, and biological parameters of water quality. The results presented in this report are described from a watershed perspective. In order to provide a quick - glance assessment of the water quality within a particular sampling station and watershed, a rating system has been established for a number of parameters. This quantitative system assigns a rating of "GOOD ", "FAIR ", or "POOR" to a sampling station depending on the percentage of samples exceeding the State standard for dissolved oxygen, turbidity, chlorophyll -a, Enterococci, and fecal coliform bacteria. If the recorded value of a parameter exceeds the State standard less than 10% of the times sampled, the station will receive a "GOOD" rating for the parameter. A "FAIR" rating is assigned when a parameter exceeds the State standard 11 -25% of the times sampled. Parameters measured that exceed the State standard more than 25% of the sampling times are given a "POOR" rating. As displayed in the tables below, turbidity and chlorophyll -a were determined to be "good" within all watersheds throughout the study period. Dissolved oxygen varied considerably between watersheds and within sites. Specifically, Barnards Creek, was deemed to be "good" while Lords Creek and Pages Creek contained "fair" levels of dissolved oxygen. Futch Creek, Motts Creek, and Prince Georges Creek were rated as "poor" for dissolved oxygen. Generally, Enterococci was problematic within a number of these watersheds. Five of the watersheds were rated as "poor" including Barnards Creek, Motts Creek, Pages Creek, Prince Georges Creek, and Smith Creek. Futch Creek and Lords Creek were deemed "good ". Fecal coliform, another indicator of bacterial contamination, was assessed monthly within Pages Creek and Futch Creek. These creeks generally exceeded the State shellfish standard for fecal coliform bacteria resulting in "poor ratings ". Ratings by Watershed Parameter Prince Smith Barnards F h utc L r Lords M Motts p ages Georg g Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Turbidit , Dissolved Oxygen O P POOR Chlorophyll - Enterococci P OO R ��' -� �� POOR POOR POOR POOR Fecal Coliform N/A P OOR N/A N/A P OOR N/A N/A Long Term Trends Using data collected on a monthly basis since at least November 2007, the long term trends of select water quality monitoring parameters were assessed in this report as well. In general, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and chlorophyll -a levels oscillate on a seasonal basis. Water i COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -2 quality, as it relates to these parameters, generally decreases during the warmer months when the water temperatures increase. However, during the cooler months, when the water temperature drops, these parameters improve. Since 2007, dissolved oxygen levels exceeded the State standard within surface samples 32 %, 29 %, 24 %, and 22% of the time within Prince Georges Creek, Motts Creek, Pages Creek, and Futch Creek, respectively. Dissolved oxygen levels were better within Smith Creek, Lords Creek, and Barnards Creek where the State standard was breached 11%, 5 %, 2 %, respectively. Enterococci bacteria has been a chronic problem within several of the creeks monitored in this study. Since November 2007, samples collected within Motts Creek, Barnards Creek, and Smith Creek exceeded the State standard for Enterococci 54 %, 50 %, and 41% of the time, respectively. Both Prince Georges Creek and Pages Creek exceeded this standard 30% of the time while Lords Creek and Futch Creek exceeded the standard 7% and 2 %, respectively. Turbidity and chlorophyll -a were not problematic in any creeks. Of the 1097 samples collected since November 2007, only 13 contained chlorophyll -a concentrations higher than the State standard of 40 ug /L. Four of these were in Pages Creek and three were in Smith Creek and Lords Creek. Two were in Prince Georges Creek and one sample exceeded the State standard in Motts Creek. The turbidity standard was only breached three times in total; two from within Smith Creek and one within Pages Creek. ii COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FINAL REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................. ............................... I 1.1 Parameters .............................................................................................. ............................... 4 1.2 Standards ................................................................................................. ..............................6 2.0 Methods ......................................................................................................... ..............................9 2.1 Physical Parameters ................................................................................ ..............................9 2.2 Chemical and Biological Parameters ...................................................... ..............................9 3.0 Results ............................................................................................................ .............................10 3.1 Rating System .......................................................................................... .............................10 3.2 Barnards Creek .......................................................................................... .............................10 3.3 Futch Creek .............................................................................................. .............................13 3.4 Lords Creek .............................................................................................. .............................17 3.5 Motts Creek .............................................................................................. .............................20 3.6 Pages Creek .............................................................................................. .............................24 3.7 Prince Georges ......................................................................................... .............................28 3.8 Smith Creek ............................................................................................. .............................32 3.9 Comprehensive Rating by Watershed ...................................................... .............................37 3.10 Long Term Trends ............................................................................... ............................... 38 3. 10.1 Dissolved Oxygen 3.10.2 Turbidity 3.10.3 Chlorophyll -a 3.10.4 Enterococci 4.0 Discussion ...................................................................................................... .............................52 5.0 Literature Cited ............................................................................................ ............................... 56 List of Figures Figure No. 1 Map of New Hanover County and watersheds included in this study ..... ..............................3 2 Water Quality Sites within the Barnards Creek Watershed ..................... ..............................1 l 3 Dissolved Oxygen at BC -CBR ................................................................. .............................12 4 Enterococci at BC- CBR ........................................................................... .............................12 5 Water Quality Sites with the Futch Creek Watershed ..................................... .............................14 6 Dissolved Oxygen at FC- 4 ........................................................................ .............................15 7 Dissolved Oxygen at FC- 6 ........................................................................ .............................15 8 Dissolved Oxygen at FC- 13 ...................................................................... .............................15 9 Dissolved Oxygen at FC- FOY .................................................................. .............................16 10 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC- 4 .................................................. .............................16 ll Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FG6 ................................................ ............................... 16 12 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FG 13 ................................................ .............................17 iii COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FINAL REPORT Table of Contents 13 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC -FOY ........................................ .............................17 14 Water Quality Site within the Lords Creek Watershed ........................ .............................19 15 Dissolved Oxygen at LC -RR ................................................................ .............................20 16 Enterococci Levels at LC- RR ............................................................... .............................20 17 Water Quality Sites within the Motts Creek Watershed ....................... .............................22 18 Dissolved Oxygen at MOT- CBR .......................................................... .............................23 19 Dissolved Oxygen at MOT -ND ............................................................ .............................23 20 Enterococci at MOT- CBR .................................................................... .............................23 21 Enterococci at MOT -ND ...................................................................... .............................24 22 Water Quality Sites within the Pages Creek Watershed ....................... .............................25 23 Dissolved Oxygen at PC -BDDS ........................................................... .............................26 24 Dissolved Oxygen at PC -BDUS ........................................................... .............................26 25 Dissolved Oxygen at PC -M .................................................................. .............................27 26 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PGBDDS ..................................... .............................27 27 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PC -BDUS ..................................... .............................27 28 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PC -M ............................................ .............................28 29 Water Quality Sites within the Prince Georges Creek Watershed ........ .............................29 30 Dissolved Oxygen at PG- CH ................................................................ .............................30 31 Dissolved Oxygen at PG- ML ................................................................ .............................30 32 Dissolved Oxygen at PG -NC ................................................................ .............................31 33 Enterococci at PG -CH .......................................................................... .............................31 34 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PG- ML .......................................... .............................31 35 Enterococci at PG -NC .......................................................................... .............................32 36 Water Quality Sites within the Smith Creek Watershed ....................... .............................33 37 Dissolved Oxygen at SC-23 .................................................................. .............................34 38 Dissolved Oxygen at SC-CD ................................................................ .............................34 39 Dissolved Oxygen at SC-CH ................................................................ .............................35 40 Dissolved Oxygen at SGGR ................................................................ .............................35 41 Dissolved Oxygen at SC- NK ................................................................ .............................35 42 Enterococci at SC-23 ............................................................................ .............................36 43 Enterococci at SC-CD ........................................................................... .............................36 44 Enterococci at SC-CH ........................................................................... .............................36 45 Enterococci at SGGR ........................................................................... .............................37 46 Enterococci at SGNK .......................................................................... .............................37 47 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Barnards Creek ....... .............................39 48 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Futch Creek ............. .............................39 49 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Lords Creek ............. .............................40 50 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Motts Creek ............. .............................40 51 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Pages Creek ............. .............................41 52 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Prince Georges Creek ..........................41 iv COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -5 NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FINAL REPORT Table of Contents 53 Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Smith Creek ............ .............................42 54 Long term surface turbidity data within Barnards Creek ...................... .............................42 55 Long term surface turbidity data within Futch Creek ........................... .............................43 56 Long term surface turbidity data within Lords Creek ........................... .............................43 57 Long term surface turbidity data within Motts Creek ........................... .............................44 58 Long term surface turbidity data within Pages Creek ........................... .............................44 59 Long term surface turbidity data within Prince Georges Creek ........... .............................45 60 Long term surface turbidity data within Smith Creek .......................... .............................45 61 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Barnards Creek .......................... .............................46 62 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Futch Creek ............................... .............................46 63 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Lords Creek ............................... .............................46 64 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Motts Creek ............................... .............................47 65 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Pages Creek ............................... .............................47 66 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Prince Georges Creek ................ .............................48 67 Long term chlorophyll -a data within Smith Creek ............................... .............................48 68 Long term Enterococci data within Barnards Creek ............................. .............................49 69 Long term Enterococci data within Futch Creek .................................. .............................49 70 Long term Enterococci data within Lords Creek .................................. .............................50 71 Long term Enterococci data within Motts Creek .................................. .............................50 72 Long term Enterococci data within Pages Creek .................................. .............................51 73 Long term Enterococci data within Prince Georges Creek .................. .............................51 74 Long term Enterococci data within Smith Creek ................................. .............................52 List of Tables TAI P, Nn 1 List of Sampling Sites .............................................................................. ..............................2 2 North Carolina Water Quality Standards ................................................. ..............................7 3 Single sample standards for Enterococci as determined by the US EPA ..............................8 4 Single sample standards for Enterococci as determined by the NC DENR Recreational WaterQuality Program ............................................................................ ..............................8 5 Tier Classification for New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Sites ....................8 6 Mean values of select parameters from Barnards Creek .......................... .............................11 7 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Barnards Creek .. .............................12 8 Mean values of select parameters from Futch Creek ................................ .............................14 9 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Futch Creek ....... .............................17 V COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FINAL REPORT Table of Contents 10 Mean values of select parameters from Lords Creek ................................ .............................19 11 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Lords Creek ....... .............................20 12 Mean values of select parameters from Motts Creek ................................ .............................22 13 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Motts Creek ....... .............................24 14 Mean values of select parameters from Pages Creek ................................ .............................26 15 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Pages Creek ....... .............................28 16 Mean values of select parameters from Prince Georges Creek ................ .............................30 17 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Prince Georges Creek .....................32 18 Mean values of select parameters from Smith Creek ............................... .............................34 19 Ratings of parameters within sampling stations within Smith Creek ...... ..............................3 7 20 Ratings of parameters within each watershed ........................................... .............................38 List of Appendices Appendix No A Photographs of Sampling Sites B Raw Data Vi COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -7 1.0 INTRODUCTION The creeks in New Hanover County, North Carolina provide a wide range of recreational activities for thousands of local citizens and visiting tourists each year. Tidal creeks are rich areas in terms of aquatic, terrestrial and avian wildlife and can support complex food webs (Odom et al, 1984; Kwak and Zedle, 1997). Protection of the water quality within these creeks is a high priority for New Hanover County. As growth and development continue within the City of Wilmington and the County, water quality has been increasingly threatened due to many factors including aging infrastructure, increased impervious surface area and subsequent stormwater runoff. Furthermore, the County's population in 2010 was estimated to be 203,439 and is expected to grow at a rate of 1.5% over the next 6 years (Access NC, 2012). To address these issues that impact water quality, the County, since 1993, has administered a long- standing water quality monitoring program designed to assess the water quality within the creeks located within the County. Coastal Planning &Engineering of North Carolina, Inc. began monitoring seven (7) tidal creeks within New Hanover County on a monthly basis in November 2007. The information presented in this report represents the results of this monitoring between the months of June 2011 and June 2012 (a total of 13 months). The creeks included in this study are Pages and Futch Creek, which drain into the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) and Lords, Motts, Barnards, Smith, and Prince Georges Creek, which drain into the Cape Fear River (Figure 1) (Table 1). Thirteen (13) of the nineteen (19) sampling sites were previously monitored by the University of North Carolina at Wilmington. In order to assess any changes to historical trends within individual sites and entire watersheds, data provided by LTNCW has been analyzed and incorporated into the results and discussion section of this report. Photographs of each sampling site are found in Appendix A. 1 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -8 Table 1. List ofSamnline Sites Creek Name Site Name Site Code Latitude Longitude Motts Creek Carolina Beach Road MOT -CBR 34° 08.610 77° 53.830 Motts Creek Normandy Drive MOT -ND 34° 08.373 77° 54.580 Lords Creek River Road LC -RR 34° 05.185 77° 55.275 Barnards Creek Carolina Beach Road BC -CBR 34° 09.522 77° 54.712 Smith Creek Castle Hayne Road SC -CH 34 15.541 77° 56.325 Smith Creek 23rd Street SC -23 34 15.472 77° 55.178 Smith Creek Candlewood Drive SC -CD 34 17.438 77° 51.332 Smith Creek North Kerr SC -NK 34 15.744 77° 53.256 Smith Creek Gordon Road SC -GR 34 16.639 77° 52.037 Prince Georges Creek Marathon Landing PG -ML 34° 21.088 77° 55.349 Prince Georges Creek Castle Hayne Road PG -CH 34° 20.675 77° 54.217 Prince Georges Creek North College PG -NC 34° 20.331 77° 53.607 Futch Creek 4 FC -4 34 18.068 77° 44.760 Futch Creek 6 FC -6 34 18.178 77° 45.038 Futch Creek 13 FC -13 34 18.214 77° 45.451 Futch Creek Foy Branch FC -FOY 34 18.405 77° 45.358 Pages Creek Mouth PC -M 34 16.209 77° 46.270 Pages Creek Bayshore Drive Down Stream PC -BDDS 34 16.685 77° 47.673 Pages Creek Bayshore Drive Up Stream PC -BDUS 34 16.623 77° 48.104 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -9 Figure 1. Map of New Hanover County and watersheds included in this study The State of North Carolina has employed a series of classifications that apply to all waters in the State including streams, rivers, and lakes (NC Administrative Code, section 15A NCAC 2B .0200). These classifications are meant to protect the specified uses within waterbodies. These include aquatic life survival and reproduction, secondary recreation, primary recreation, shellfishing, and water supply. The classifications that apply to the creeks examined in this study are: 3 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -10 C Sw: Freshwater that is protected for aquatic life and secondary recreation uses. The "Sw" supplemental classification indicates that these are swamp waters, and so are likely to have lower dissolved oxygen and pH than non -swamp streams due to natural conditions. However, a majority of the sites, including Lords Creek, Motts Creek, Barnards Creek, Smith Creek, and Prince Georges Creek, designated as C Sw by the State, are tidally influenced and have a brackish salinity range. SA: Saline water bodies that are protected for shellfishing uses. This use requires a more stringent standard for fecal coliform. Areas protected for shellfishing are also subject to the protection requirements for the less stringent classifications of SC and SB, which include aquatic life, secondary recreation, and primary recreation. This designation applies to Futch Creek and Pages Creek. 1.1 Parameters Physical, chemical, and biological water quality monitoring data are currently being collected for this study. Physical parameters include temperature, salinity, conductivity, pH, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen. Chemical parameters monitored in this study include orthophosphate and nitrate /nitrite. Biological parameters include Chlorophyll -a and two suites of fecal indicator bacteria: Enterococci and fecal coliform bacteria. Due to limited funding, fecal coliform samples were only collected from sampling sites located within Futch Creek and Pages Creek. Temperature: Thermal pollution can result in significant changes to the aquatic environment. Most aquatic organisms are adapted to survive within a specific temperature range. Thermal pollution may also increase the extent to which fish are vulnerable to toxic compounds, parasites, and disease. If temperatures reach extremes of heat or cold, few organisms will survive. Thermal pollution may be caused by stormwater runoff from warm surfaces such as streets and parking lots. Soil erosion is another cause, since it can cause cloudy conditions in a water body. Cloudy water absorbs the sun's rays, resulting in a rise in water temperature. Thermal pollution may even be caused by the removal of trees and vegetation which normally shade the water body. In addition to the direct effects of thermal pollution on aquatic life, there are numerous indirect effects. Thermal pollution results in lowered levels of dissolved oxygen, since cooler water can hold more oxygen than warmer water. Salinity: Salinity is a measure of the amount of sodium chloride ions dissolved in water. This is important to monitor since changes in the levels of salt concentration can impact the ability of salt sensitive species to survive. An estuary, such as the lower Cape Fear River, usually exhibits a gradual change in salinity throughout its length, as freshwater entering the estuary from tributaries mixes with seawater moving in from the ocean. Salinity levels control, to a large degree, the types of plants and animals that can live in different zones of the estuary. Freshwater species may be restricted to the upper reaches of the estuary, while marine species inhabit the estuarine mouth. Some species tolerate only intermediate levels of salinity while broadly adapted species can acclimate to any salinity ranging from freshwater to seawater. FA COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -11 Conductivity: Specific conductance is a measure of the ability of water to conduct an electrical current. Similar to salinity, it measures the amount of dissolved ions (including sodium chloride) in the water. pH• The pH of water is a measurement of the concentration of H+ ions, using a scale that ranges from 0 to 14. Natural water usually has a pH between 6.5 and 8.5. While there are natural variations in pH, many pH variations are due to human influences. Unanticipated decreases in pH could be indications of acid rain, runoff from acidic soils, or contamination by agricultural chemicals. Turbidity: Turbidity is the amount of particulate matter that is suspended in water. Turbidity measures the scattering effect that suspended solids have on light: the higher the intensity of scattered light, the higher the turbidity. During a rainstorm, particles from the surrounding land are washed into the river making the water a muddy brown color, indicating higher turbidity. Dissolved Oxygen: Dissolved oxygen (DO) refers to the volume of oxygen that is contained in water. Oxygen enters the water as rooted aquatic plants and algae undergo photosynthesis and as oxygen is transferred across the air -water interface. The amount of oxygen that can be held by the water depends on the water temperature, salinity, and pressure. Rapidly moving water, such as in a flowing stream, tends to contain a lot of dissolved oxygen, while stagnant water contains little. Oxygen levels are also affected by the diurnal (daily) cycle. Plants, such as rooted aquatic plants and algae produce excess oxygen during the daylight hours when they are photosynthesizing. During the dark hours they must use oxygen for life processes. Bacteria in water can consume oxygen as organic matter decays. Thus, excess organic material in waterbodies can cause oxygen deficits. Aquatic life can become stressed or die in stagnant water containing high levels of rotting, organic material in it, especially in summer, when dissolved - oxygen levels are at a seasonal low. Phosphates: Phosphorus is a nutrient required by all organisms for the basic processes of life. Phosphorus is a natural element found in rocks, soils and organic material. Phosphorus clings tightly to soil particles and is used by plants, so its concentration in clean waters is generally very low. However, phosphorus is used extensively in fertilizer and other chemicals, so it can be found in higher concentrations in areas of human activity. High levels in the water column can be detrimental to water quality as phosphates can cause algal blooms resulting in decreased dissolved oxygen levels. Orthophosphate is sometimes referred to as "reactive phosphorus." Orthophosphate is the most stable kind of phosphate, and is the form used by plants. Orthophosphate is produced by natural processes and is found in sewage. 1 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -12 Nitrate/Nitrite: Nitrate is highly soluble (dissolves easily) in water and is stable over a wide range of environmental conditions. It is easily transported in streams and groundwater. Nitrates feed plankton (microscopic plants and animals that live in water), aquatic plants, and algae, which are then eaten by fish. Nitrite is relatively short-lived in water because it is quickly converted to nitrate by bacteria. Excessive concentrations of nitrate and /or nitrite can be harmful to humans and wildlife. If excessive amounts of nitrates are added to the water, algae and aquatic plants can be produced in large quantities. When these algae die, bacteria decompose them, and use up oxygen. Chlorophyll -a: Chlorophyll -a is a green pigment found in plants. It absorbs sunlight and converts it to sugar during photosynthesis. Chlorophyll -a concentrations are an indicator of phytoplankton abundance and biomass in coastal and estuarine waters. High levels often indicate an algal bloom which can induce the depletion of oxygen in the water column due to the microbial degradation of plant cells. Chlorophyll -a concentrations are often higher after rainfall, particularly if the rain has flushed nutrients into the water. Higher chlorophyll -a levels are also common during the summer months when water temperatures and light levels are high because these conditions lead to greater phytoplankton numbers. Fecal Colifo�Yn: e Fecal Coliform bacteria are present in the feces and intestinal tracts of humans and other warm - blooded animals, and can enter water bodies from human and animal waste. If a large number of fecal coliform bacteria are found in water, it is possible that pathogenic (disease- or illness - causing) organisms are also present in the water. Pathogens are typically present in such small amounts it is impractical to monitor them directly. High concentrations of the bacteria in water may be caused by septic tank failure, poor animal keeping practices, pet waste, and urban runoff. In order to adequately assess human health risks and develop watershed management plans, it is necessary to know the sources of fecal contamination. F"tornl-nl-l-i Enterococci are distinguished from fecal coliform bacteria by their ability to survive in saltwater, and in this respect they more closely mimic many pathogens than do the other indicators. Enterococci are typically more human - specific than the larger fecal streptococcus group. EPA recommends Enterococci as the best indicator of health risk in saltwater used for recreation and as a useful indicator in freshwater as well. In 2004, Enterococci took the place of fecal coliform as the new federal standard for water quality at public beaches. It is believed to provide a higher correlation than fecal coliform with many of the human pathogens often found in sewage (Jeng, et al., 2004). Results indicated that Enterococci might be a more stable indicator than fecal coliform and, consequently, a more conservative indicator under brackish water conditions. 1.2 Standards Water quality standards have been established legislatively for a number of these parameters (Table 2). Many of the water quality standards are described in the NC Administrative Code, section 15A NCAC 2H .0100. The water quality standards for Enterococci bacteria are COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -13 described by the US EPA (US EPA, 1986) and in the NC Administrative Code, section 15A NCAC 18A .3402. The US EPA standards for Enterococci bacteria are based on incidents of gastrointestinal illness following contact with bathing waters. Bacterial contamination is quantified by "colony forming units" or CFU. Single sample maximum allowable Enterococci density is 104 CFU/ 100ml, 158 CFU/ 100ml, 276 CFU/ 100ml, and 501 CFU/ 100ml for designated beach areas, swimming areas with moderate to full body contact, lightly used full body contact swimming areas, and infrequently used full body contact swimming areas, respectively (Table 3). When at least five samples are collected within a 30 day period, the US EPA recommends utilizing a geometric mean standard of 35 CFU/ 100ml. Geometric means are often useful summaries for highly skewed data, as are often found with bacteriological datasets. The North Carolina Recreational Water Quality Program (RWQ) adopted similar standards for Enterococci bacteria, also determined by the frequency of swimming activity. As defined by RWQ, Tier I swimming areas are used daily during the swimming season, Tier II swimming areas are used three days a week during the swimming season, and Tier III swimming areas are used on average 4 days a month during the swimming season. Single sample standards for Tiers I, II, and III are 104 CFU / 100ml, 276 CFU / 100ml, and 500 CFU / 100ml, respectively (Table 4). A geometric mean of 35 CFU / 100ml within Tier I swimming areas may also be utilized if at least five samples are collected within 30 days. The creeks included in this study have not been classified within the RWQ tier system; however an analysis of accessibility as an indicator of swimming and boating usage has been performed (Table 5). Based on this analysis, of the nineteen (19) sampling sites, three (3) could be considered Tier II and sixteen (16) could be considered Tier III. Table 2. North Carolina Water Duality Standards Parameter Standard for SA Waters Standard for C Sw Waters Dissolved Oxygen 5.0 mg/1 4.0 Mg/l Turbidity 25 NTU 50 NTU pH 6.8 -8.5 6.0 -9.0 Chloro h 11 -a 40.0 u /1 40.0 u /1 Fecal Coliform Geometric Mean (5 samples within 30 days) <14 CFU /100m1; or 10% of samples <43 CFU /100m1 Geometric Mean (5 samples within 30 days) <200 CFU /100m1; or single sample <400 CFU /100m1 Enterococci ° Geometric Mean (5 samples within 30 days) <35 CFU /100m1 Geometric Mean (5 samples within 30 days) <35 CFU /100m1 ka) Swamp waters may have lower values if caused by natural conditions (b) For swamp streams, pH may be as low as 4.3 if caused by natural conditions (c) See Table 4 for single sample standards based off the tiered system employed by NC DENR Recreational Water Quality Program %I COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -14 Table 3. Single sample standards_for Enterococci as determined by the US EPA Table 4. Single sample standards for Enterococci as determined by the NC DENR Recreational Water Quality Program Single sample maximum Designated beach areas < 104 CFU /100ml Swimming areas with moderate full body contact < 158 CFU / l 00ml Lightly used full body contact swimming areas < 276 CFU / l 00ml Infrequently used full body contact swimming areas < 501 CFU /100ml Table 4. Single sample standards for Enterococci as determined by the NC DENR Recreational Water Quality Program Table 5. Tier Classifcation_for New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Sites Site Name Single sample maximum Tier I, swimming areas used daily during the < 104 CFU / l OOmI swimming season Tier III Tier II, swimming areas used three days a week <276 CFU / l OOmI during the swimming season Tier III Tier III, swimming areas used on average four days <500 00 CFU / l OOmI a month during the swimming season Tier III Table 5. Tier Classifcation_for New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Sites Site Name Proposed Tier Classification Accessible for Boating or Swimming Comments MOT -CBR Tier III No Adjacent to culvert off Carolina Beach Road MOT -ND Tier III No Adjacent to small bridge on Normandy Drive LGRR Tier III No Adjacent to bridge on River Road BGCBR Tier III No Adjacent to culvert off Carolina Beach Road SC -CH Tier III No Adjacent to bridge on Castle Ha ne Road SC -23 Tier III No Adjacent to bridge on 23rd Street SC-CD Tier III No Narrow, shallow. Adjacent to Candlewood Drive SC -NK Tier II Yes Small boat launch site off North Kerr SC -GR Tier III No Adjacent to culvert on Gordon Road PG -ML Tier III No Small boat launch site on private propert PG -CH Tier III No Adjacent to culvert on Castle Ha ne Road PG -NC Tier III No Adjacent to culvert on North College Road FG4 Tier III No Private docks are the only means of direct access FG6 Tier III No Private docks are the only means of direct access FC -13 Tier III No Private docks are the only means of direct access FC -FOY Tier III No No clear access points no docks on Foy branch PC -M Tier II Yes Direct access via docks and boat ramp at Pages Creek Marina PC -BDDS Tier III No Private docks are the only means of direct access PC -BDUS Tier II Yes Public boat ramp off Ba shore Drive 0 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -15 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Physical Parameters All physical measurements (temperature, salinity, conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and pH) were taken in situ utilizing a 6820 YSI Multiparameter Water Quality Probe linked to a YSI 650 MDS display unit. The YSI Probe was calibrated each day prior to use. Physical measurements were taken from the surface at all sites (depth = O.lm) and near the creek bottom at sites with depths greater than 0.5m. Following each sampling trip, the YSI Probe was post- calibrated following each sampling date to ensure that the physical parameters measured were within an acceptable range. 2.2 Chemical and Biological Parameters Water samples were obtained for the laboratory analysis of chemical (nitrate /nitrite and orthophosphate) and biological (Enterococci, fecal coliform, and Chlorophyll -a) parameters. These grab samples were collected in sterile bottles during a high ebb tide from the surface at each site (depth = O.lm). Water samples were placed on ice immediately following collection and were delivered in coolers to Environmental Chemists, Inc. of Wilmington, North Carolina for analysis. All analyses performed by Environmental Chemists, Inc. were conducted utilizing the following standard EPA approved methods: Orthophosphate: SM 4500E Nitrate/Nitrite : EPA 353.2 Chlorophyll -a: SM 10200H Fecal Coliform: SM 9222D Enterococci : EnterolertE X COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -16 3.0 RESULTS The results described in this report represent the physical, biological, and chemical data collected from all sampling sites on a monthly basis between June 2011 and June 2012. These results are organized by watershed. All raw data, including parameters not summarized in this section, are included in Appendix B. 3.1 Rating System In order to provide a quick - glance assessment of the water quality within a particular sampling station or watershed, a rating system for a number of parameters has been employed. This quantitative system assigns a rating of "GOOD ", "FAIR ", or "POOR" to a sampling station depending on the percentage of samples exceeding the State standard for dissolved oxygen, turbidity, Chlorophyll -a, Enterococci, and fecal coliform bacteria. If the recorded value of a parameter exceeds the State standard less than 10% of the times sampled, the station will receive a "Good" rating for the parameter. A "Fair" rating is assigned when a parameter exceeds the State standard 11 -25% of the times sampled. Parameters measured that exceed the State standard more than 25% of the sampling times are given a "Poor" rating. 3.2 Barnards Creek The Barnards Creek watershed includes 4,953 acres and is located in the southwestern portion of the County, just along the City line. The watershed drains portions of Carolina Beach Road at its headwaters and flows towards River Road before entering into the Cape Fear River. Zoning within the watershed is comprised of a mix of residential and commercial uses. The land is classified as a mix of transition, urban, and conservation according to the CAMA land use plan. This watershed contains approximately 16.9% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Sampling was conducted at one site (BC -CBR) within the Barnards Creek watershed (Figure 2). Dissolved oxygen within BC -CBR ranged between 1.0 mg /1 and 10.2 mg /1 with a mean value of 6.3 mg /1 (Table 6). These values were within an acceptable level above the State standard of 4.0 mg /1 for C Sw waters during all sampling events at both the surface and near the bottom of the water column (Figure 3). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 0.0 ug /1 and 11.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 2.0 ug /1 at BGCBR (Table 6). These values did not approach the 40ug /1 standard. Enterococci ranged between 23 CFU /100m1 and 20,000 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 618 CFU /100m1, which is above the NCDENR standard of 500 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters (Figure 4, Table 6). Five (5) of the twelve (12) samples collected during this period exceeded this standard. Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.04 mg /1 and 0.19 mg /1 with a mean of 0.10 mg /1 (Table 6). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.06 mg /1 with a mean of 0.02 mg /1 (Table 6). 10 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -17 Turbidity values were generally good ranging between 0 and 33 NTU with a mean value of 9 NTU (Table 6). No observations exceeded the State standard of 50 NTU for C SW waters. Table 7 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. Table 6. Mean values of select parame ters from Barnards Creek. Range in parentheses. Parameter BGCBR Turbidity (NTU) 9(0-33) Dissolved Oxygen (mg /1) 6.3 (1.0 -10.2) Nitrate/Nitrite (mg /1) 0.10 (0.04 -0.19) Orthophosphate (mg /1) 0.02 (0.01 -0.06) Chlorophyll -a (ug /1) 2.0 (0.0 -11.0) Enterococci (#CFU/ I 00ml) 618 (23- 20,000) (1) Enterococci values expressed as geometric mean 11 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -18 Figure 2. Water Quality Sites within the Barnards Creek Watershed Figure 4. Enterococci at BC -CBR Table 7. Ratings o parameters within samplin stations within Barnards Creek Parameter BC -CBR Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen Chloroph ll -a Enterococci 12 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -19 Figure 3. Dissolved Oxygen at 15U -U15K 3.3 Futch Creek Futch Creek is located on the New Hanover- Pender County line and drains into the Intracoastal Waterway. The Futch Creek watershed encompasses approximately 3,136 acres extending from Scotts Hill Loop Road and Highway 17 on the north and east, to Porters Neck Road on the south. Zoning within the Futch Creek watershed is predominately residential with a small business district along Highway 17. The land within the Futch Creek watershed is classified as watershed resource protection or transition in the CAMA land use plan. This watershed contains approximately 11.0% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Sampling was conducted at four (4) sites (FC-4, FC -6, FC -13, and FGFOY) within the Futch Creek watershed (Figure 5). Dissolved oxygen within the creek ranged between 3.5 mg /1 and 9.4 mg /1 with a mean value of 5.9 mg /1 (Figures 6 -9, Table 8). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 1.0 ug /1 and 5.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 2.0 ug /1 (Table 8). None of these values approached the 40ug /1 Chlorophyll -a standard. Enterococci ranged between 5 CFU /100m1 and 420 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 13 CFU /100m1. No samples collected within Futch Creek exceeded the NCDENR Enterococci standard of 500 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters (Figures 10 -13, Table 8). The geometric mean of fecal coliform in Futch Creek was 14 CFU with a range of 5 to 910 CFUs. This geometric mean was equal to the NCDENR Shellfish Sanitation single- sample standard of 14 CFU / 100ml (Table 8). Seventeen percent (17 %) of all samples analyzed for fecal coliform levels exceeded 43 CFU/ 100ml. The State standard requires "no more than 10% of samples shall exceed 43 CFU /100ml) ". Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.04 mg /1 with a mean of 0.01 mg /1 (Table 8). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.03 mg /1 with a mean of 0.01 mg /1 (Table 8). Turbidity values were generally low ranging between 0 and 26 NTU with a mean value of 3 NTU (Table 8). No observations exceeded the State standard of 25 NTU for SA waters. Table 9 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. 13 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -20 Table 8. Mean values of select parameters _from Futch Creek. Range in parentheses. Parameter FG4 FG6 FC -13 FC -FOY Turbidity (NTU) 2(0-14) 1(0-18) 5(0 -26) 5(0-16) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1) 6.1 (4.0 -8.9) 6.0 (3.6 -9.2) 5.8 (3.0 -10.1) 5.9 (3.3 -9.4) Nitrate/Nitrite (m /1) 0.01 (0.01 -0.01) 0.01 (0.01 -0.01) 0.01 (0.01 -0.04) 0.01 (0.01 -0.01) Orthophosphate (mg/1 0.01 (0.01 -0.02) 0.01 (0.01 -0.01) 0.02 (0.01 -0.03) 0.01 (0.01 -0.02) Chlorophyll -a (ug/1) 2,0 (1.0 -4.0) 2.0 (1.0 -5.0) 2.0 (1.0 -5.0) 2.0 (1.0 -2.0) Enterococci 1 9 (5 -43) 1 13 (5 -64) 1 16 (5 -420) 1 14 (5 -172) (#CFU/ I 00ml) Fecal Coliform g �5 -118) 1 12 (5 -55) 1 29 (5 -910) 1 13 (5 -270) 1 (#CFU/ I 00ml) (1) Enterococci and Fecal Coliform values expressed as geometric mean 14 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -21 Figure 5. Water Quality Sites within the Futch Creek Watershed Figure 8. Dissolved Oxygen at FC -13 w COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -22 Figure 6. Dissolved Oxygen at FC -4 Figure 7. Dissolved Oxygen at FC -6 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform Levels at FC -4 Entero. Fecal Col. Figure 10. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC -4 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform Levels at FC -6 Entero. Fecal Col. Figure 11. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC -6 16 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -23 v figure y. ijissowea Oxygen at v u -v v Y Figure 12. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC -13 Enterococci and Fecal Coliform Levels at FC -FOY 1,000 4° •F* v 100 0 Entero. c� " o 71 10 Fecal Col. Mw •~ U f 0 W � � Figure 13. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at FC -FOY 'fable 9. Ratinvs ot'narameters within samnline stations within Futch (;reek 3.4 Lords Creek The Lords Creek Watershed is located in the southwestern portion of the County and encompasses approximately 3,047 acres. Zoning within the watershed is completely residential. This watershed contains approximately 12.6% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). According to the CAMA land use plan, the land in the watershed is classified as a mix of conservation, transition, watershed resource protection and a small natural heritage resource 17 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -24 protection designation. Sampling was conducted at one (1) site (LC-RR) within the Lords Creek watershed (Figure 14). Dissolved oxygen LC -RR ranged between 3.4 mg /1 and 11.0 mg /1 with a mean value of 6.8 mg /1 (Table 10). Eleven of the thirteen samples were within an acceptable level above the State standard of 4.0 mg /1 for C Sw waters during both the surface and near the bottom of the water column (Figure 15). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 2.0 ug /1 and 17.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 7.0 ug /1 (Table 10). No samples exceeded the State standard of 40ug /1 for Chlorophyll -a. Enterococci ranged between 19 CFU /100m1 and 728 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 65 CFU /100m1 (Table 10). One sample contained high levels of Enterococci beyond the NCDENR standard of 500 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters. Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.40 mg /1 with a mean of 0.22 mg /1 (Table 10). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.03 mg /1 and 0.30 mg /1 with a mean of 0.09 mg /1 (Table 10). Turbidity values were generally moderate ranging between 1 and 17 NTU with a mean value of 8 NTU (Table 10). No observations exceeded the State standard of 50 NTU for C Sw waters in Lords Creek during the study period. Table 11 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -25 Table 10. Mean values o select parameters nom Loads Creek. Range in parentheses. Parameter LGRR Turbidity (NTU) 8(1-17) Dissolved Oxygen (mg /1) 6.8 (3.4 -11.0) Nitrate/Nitrite (mg /1) 0.22 (0.01 -0.40) Orthophosphate (mg /1) 0.09 (0.03 -0.30) Chlorophyll -a (ug /1) 7 (2.0 -17.0) Enterococci (#CFU/ I 00ml) 65 (19 -728) (l) Enterococci values expressed as geometric mean COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -26 Figure 14. Water Quality Site within the Lords Creek Watershed Figure 15. Dissolved Oxygen at LC -RR Entero. Figure 16. Enterococci Levels at LC -RR Table 11. Ratines of narameters within samnline stations within Lords Creek Parameter LC -RR Turbidity � Dissolved Oxygen Chloroph ll -a Enterococci " 3.5 Motts Creek Motts Creek watershed encompasses approximately 2,389 acres and is located in the southwestern portion of the County, just below Sanders Road. The Creek drains portions of Carolina Beach Road at its headwaters and then drains toward River Road before entering into the Cape Fear River. Zoning in the watershed is predominately residential with commercial business districts along Carolina Beach Road. Land in the watershed is classified as transition, conservation or wetland resource protection according to the CAMA land use plan. This watershed contains approximately 12.6% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Sampling 20 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -27 was conducted at two (2) sites (MOT -CBR, MOT -ND) within the Motts Creek watershed (Figure 17). Dissolved oxygen within Motts Creek ranged between 3.4 mg /1 and 11.0 mg /1 with a mean value of 5.3 mg /1 (Figures 18 and 19, Table 12). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 0.0 ug /1 and 6.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 2.0 ug /1 (Table 12). These values did not approach the 40ug /1 standard. Enterococci ranged between 118 CFU /100m1 and 26,000 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 1,138 CFU /100m1 (Table 12). MOT -CBR each exceeded the NCDENR standard of 500 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters during five (5) of the thirteen (13) times it was sampled. MOT- ND exceeded this standard 100% of the time (Figures 20 and 21). Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.06 mg /1 and 0.28 mg /1 with a mean of 0.14 mg /1 (Table 12). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.06 mg /1 with a mean of 0.02 mg /1 (Table 12). Turbidity values were generally good ranging between 0 and 13 NTU with a mean value of 5 NTU (Table 12). No turbidity observations exceeded the State standard of 50 NTU for C Sw waters. Table 13 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. 21 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -28 Table 12. Mean values of select parameters from Motts Creek. Range in parentheses. Parameter MOT -CBR MOT -ND Turbidity (NTU) 4(0-13) 5(1-10) Dissolved Oxygen (mg /1) 5.0 (2.0 -10.2) 5.5 (2.1 -8.6) Nitrate/Nitrite (mg /1) 0.14 (0.06 -0.26) 0.14 (0.07 -0.28) Orthophosphate (mg /1) 0.02 (0.01 -0.06) 0.02 (0.01 -0.06) Chlorophyll -a (ug /1) 2.0 (1.0 -3.0) 2.0 (0.0 -6.0) Enterococci (#CFU/ I 00ml) 605 (118 - 6000) 2,141(546- 26,000) (l) Enterococci values expressed as geometric mean 22 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -29 Figure 17. Water Quality Sites within the Motts Creek Watershed Figure 18. Dissolved Oxygen at MOT -CBR Enterococci Levels at MOT-CBR Figure 20. Enterococci at MOT -CBR 23 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -30 vigure ig. ijissomeci uxygen at lvtu't'-tN jj Figure 21. Enterococci at MOTAD Table 13. Ratings of narameters within samnline stations within Motts Creek Parameter MOT -CBR MOT -ND Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen P OO Chloroph ll - }� Enterococci P OO R rP 3.6 Pages Creek Located in northeastern New Hanover County and encompassing 2,044 acres, Pages Creek watershed drains into the Intracoastal Waterway, north of Middle Sound Loop Road. Zoning within the Pages Creek watershed is predominately residential, with commercial zoning along Highway 17. The land within the Pages Creek watershed is predominately classified as watershed resource protection and conservation, with a small portion classified as transitional according to the CAMA land use plan. This watershed contains approximately 23.2% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Sampling was conducted at three (3) sites (PC- BDDS, PC -BDUS, and PC -M) within the Motts Creek watershed (Figure 22). Dissolved oxygen within Pages Creek ranged between 1.7 mg /1 and 8.2 mg /1 with a mean value of 5.3 mg/ (Table 14) (Figures 23 through 25). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 1.0 ug /1 and 21.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 3.0 ug /1 (Table 14). No samples exceeded the State standard of 40 ug /1 for chlorophyll -a. Enterococci ranged between 5 CFU/ 100m1 and 60,000 CFU/ 100m1 with a geometric mean value of 113 CFU /100m1 (Figures 26 -28, Table 14). While samples collected from PC -M did not contain high levels of Enterococci, three (3) and eight (8) samples from PGBDDS and PG BDUS, respectively, contained levels higher than the NCDENR standards. Fecal coliform levels ranged between 5 CFU /100m1 and 40,000 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean of 82 CFU /100m1 (Table 14). Fecal coliform levels exceeded the NCDENR Shellfish 24 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13-1-31 Sanitation single - sample standard of 14 CFU /100m1 on all thirteen (13) sampling events at PG BDDS and PC -BDUS. This standard was breached at PC -M on one (1) occasion (Figures 26 through 28). Sixty -seven percent (67 %) of all samples analyzed for fecal coliform levels exceeded 43 CFU /100m1. The State standard allows "no more than 10% of samples shall exceed 43 CFU /100m1 ". Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.22 mg /1 with a mean of 0.02 mg /1 (Table 14). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.18 mg /1 with a mean of 0.03 mg /1 (Table 14). Turbidity values were generally good ranging between 0 and 28 NTU with a mean value of 7 NTU (Table 14). None of the observed turbidity values exceeded the State standard of 25 NTU for class SA waters. Table 15 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. Figure 22. Water Quality Sites within the Pages Creek Watershed w COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -32 Table 14. Mean values of select narameters from Pages Creek. Range in narentheses. Parameter PC -BDUS PC -BDDS PGM Turbidity (NTU) 5(1-11) 9(0-28) 5(1-11) Dissolved Oxygen (mg /1) 5.0 (2.4 -7.4) 5.0 (1.7 -7.8) 6.0 (3.9 -8.2) Nitrate/Nitrite (mg /1) 0.03 (0.01 -0.22) 0.01 (0.01 -0.03) 0.02 (0.01 -0.07) Orthophosphate (mg /1) 0.07 (0.01 -0.18) 0.02 (0.01 -0.04) 0.01 (0.01 -0.02) Chlorophyll -a (ug /1) 5.0 (1.0 -21.0) 3.0 (1.0 -10.0) 2.0 (1.0 -4.0) Enterococci (#CFU/ I 00ml) 690 (37- 60,000) 254 (19- 6,000) 8(5-55) 1 Fecal Coliform ( #CFU/ l 00m1 360 (64- 40,000) 223 (37- 6,000) 7(5-10) k "Enterococci and fecal coliform values expressed as geometric mean 26 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -33 Figure 23. Dissolved Oxygen at PC -BDDS Figure 24. Dissolved Oxygen at PC -BDUS Fi 25. Dissolved Ox at PC-M Enterococci and Fecal Coliform Levels at PC-BDDS 10000 4-o .F* 1000 PENO . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ... M+ Entero. In 100 Fecal Col. 10 �w • Poo Cb\\ Fi 26. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PC-BDDS Enterococci and Fecal Coliform Levels at PC-BDUS Fi 27. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PC-BDUS 27 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 13-1-34 Figure 28. Enterococci and Fecal Coliform at PC -M Y Dissolved Oxygen POO ' Chloroph ll -a � Enterococci POOR POO Fecal Coliform POOR POOR ible 15. Ratings o parameters within sampkng stations within Pages Lre, Parameter PC -BDDS PC -BDDS PC -M Turbidity , � : , k 3.7 Prince Georges Prince Georges Creek drains into the Cape Fear River. The Prince Georges Creek watershed is approximately 14,589 acres and drains most of Castle Hayne, extending eastward across I -40 into the Blue Clay Road area. Zoning within the Prince Georges Creek watershed is predominately residential with some business and light industrial districts within Castle Hayne. Most of the land within the Prince Georges Creek watershed is classified as aquifer resource protection, conservation or transition according to the CAMA land use plan. This watershed contains approximately 10.1% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Sampling was conducted at three (3) sites (PG -CH, PG -ML, and PG -NC) within the Prince Georges Creek watershed (Figure 29). Dissolved oxygen within Prince Georges Creek ranged between 0.3 mg /1 and 9.5 mg /1 with a mean value of 4.5 mg /1 (Table 16). Surface dissolved oxygen values at PG -CH and PG -NC were below the State standard of 4.0 mg /1 for C Sw during four (4) and eight (8) sampling events, respectively. PG -ML was below the standard on three (3) occasions (Figures 30 through 32). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 1.0 ug /1 and 66.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 10.0 ug /1 (Table 16). One sample from PG -CH exceeded the 40ug /1 standard. Enterococci ranged between 5 CFU /100m1 and 7,000 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 203 CFU /100m1 (Table 16). During this study, six (6) and five (5) samples from PG -CH and PG -ML, respectively, contained Enterococci levels above the NCDENR standard of 500 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -35 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters. No samples from PG -NC exceeded this value during the same time period (Figures 33 through 35). Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.32 mg /1 with a mean of 0.8 mg /1 (Table 16). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.50 mg /1 with a mean of 0.04 mg /1 (Table 16). Turbidity values were generally good ranging between 0 and 29 NTU with a mean value of 5 NTU (Table 16). No observed turbidity values exceeded the State standard of 50 NTU for C Sw waters. Table 17 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. wt COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -36 Figure 29. Water Quality Sites within the Prince Georges Creek Watershed Table 16. Mean values of select parameters from Prince Georges Creek. Range in parentheses. Parameter PG -CH PG -ML PG -NC Turbidity (NTU) 5(0-21) 2(0-7) 9(0-29) Dissolved Oxygen (mg /1) 4.8 (2.4 -8.2) 5.7 (2.8 -9.5) 3.1 (0.3 -6.9) Nitrate/Nitrite (mg /1) 0.14 (0.01 -0.32) 0.07 (0.01 -0.16) 0.04 (0.01 -0.16) Orthophosphate (mg /1) 0.04 (0.01 -0.09) 0.08 (0.01 -0.50) 0.02 (0.01 -0.03) Chlorophyll -a (ug /1) 16 (1.0 -66.0) 9.0 (2.0 -19.0) 7.0 (1.0 -37.0) Enterococci (#CFU/ I 00ml) 415 (82- 7,000) 412 (109 - 1,270) 49(5-340) "'Enterococci values expressed as geometric mean PG -CH Dissolved Oxygen Figure 30. Dissolved Oxygen at PG -CH PG -ML Dissolved Oxygen Figure 31. Dissolved Oxygen at PG -ML 30 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -37 Enterococci Levels at PG-CH 0 I VVVV 1000 6T* C.� Zit , 1 100 I Entero Fi 33. Enterococei at PG-CH Enterococci Levels at PG-MIL E Enter o. Fi 34. Enterococei and Fecal Coliform at PG-ML 31 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 13-1-38 -r fi .j.L. tyissowea "x a-i 10 'T' .. .,,,.,,,.,,,.. , . . . .. ... ... . . . . .. ... ... ... . r ,,,. .,,,.,,,.,,,..T ' I Entero Fi 33. Enterococei at PG-CH Enterococci Levels at PG-MIL E Enter o. Fi 34. Enterococei and Fecal Coliform at PG-ML 31 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 13-1-38 -r fi .j.L. tyissowea "x a-i Enterococci Levels at PG -NC 0 Entero. Figure 35. Enterococci at PG -NC Table 17. Ratines of Parameters within samnlinva stations within Prince Georvaes Creek Parameter PG -CH PG -ML PG -NC Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen P OO R P OO R Chloroph ll -a Enterococci POOR POO 3.8 Smith Creek Located in north- central New Hanover County and containing approximately 14,665 acres, the Smith Creek watershed drains into the lower northeast Cape Fear River, just north of the Isabelle Holmes Bridge. The watershed drains land within the City limits and the unincorporated County, including the Wilmington International Airport. Zoning within the Smith Creek watershed is a mix of industrial, residential, and commercial. The land within the watershed is predominately classified as urban and transition, with a small portion classified as conservation. This watershed contains approximately 21.9% impervious surface coverage (Hume, 2009). Along with increased development and impervious surfaces, water quality in Smith Creek has declined in recent years. High bacteria levels have been reported, as well as low dissolved oxygen levels. As a result, Smith Creek has been listed on the 3 03 (d) list for impaired waters due to impaired biological integrity. Sampling was conducted at five (5) sites (SC -CH, SC -23, SC -NK, SC -GR, SC -CD) within the Smith Creek watershed (Figure 36). Dissolved oxygen within the creek ranged between 2.9 mg /1 and 11.0 mg /1 with a mean value of 7.1 mg /1 (Table 18). Dissolved oxygen levels within SC-23 and SC -NK fell below State standard of 4.0 mg /1 for C Sw waters on two occasions. SC-CH fell below the standard three times (Figures 37 through 41). Chlorophyll -a ranged between 1.0 ug /1 and 32.0 ug /1 with a mean value of 7.0 ug /1 (Table 18). No samples exceeded the State Standard for chlorophyll -a. 32 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -39 Enterococci ranged between 10 CFU /100m1 and 36,000 CFU /100m1 with a geometric mean value of 294 CFU /100m1 (Table 18). A number of samples exceeded the NCDENR standard of 500 CFU /100m1 for Tier III waters including eleven (11) from SC -CD and eight (8) from SC- GR. Five (5) samples from SC -NK exceeded the NCDENR standard of 276 CFU /100m1 for Tier II waters (Figures 42 through 46). Nitrate /nitrite levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.52 mg /1 with a mean of 0.17 mg /1 (Table 18). Orthophosphate levels ranged between 0.01 mg /1 and 0.14 mg /1 with a mean of 0.04 mg /1 (Table 18). Turbidity values were generally good ranging between 0 and 17 NTU with a mean value of 5 NTU (Table 18). No observations exceeded the State standard of 50 NTU for SW class C waters. Table 19 depicts the ratings for these parameters for the watershed. 33 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -40 Figure 36. Water Quality Sites within the Smith Creek Watershed Table 18. Mean values of select narameters from Smith Creek. Range in narentheses. Parameter SC -23 SC-CD SC-CH SGGR SC -NK Turbidity (N TU ) 7(3-10) 1(0-4) 15(0-47) 3(0-15) 2(0-5) Dissolved Oxygen (m g/1 6.6 (3.2 -11.0) 8.3 (6.6 -10.9) 6.5 (2.9 -10.6) 8.0 (6.5 -10.6) 6.3 (3.6 -9.7) Nitrate/Nitrite ( mg/1 ) 0.21 (0.08 -0.31) 0.11 (0.05 -0.16) 0.33 (0.11 -0.52) 0.11 (0.04 -0.26) 0.10 (0.01 -0.29) Orthophosphate ( mg/1 ) 0.06 (0.02 -0.11) 0.01 (0.01 -0.02) 0.07 (0.04 -0.14) 0.02 (0.01 -0.09) 0.03 (0.01 -0.06) Chlorophyll -a (ug/1) 12.0 (3.0 -24.0) 2.0 (1.0 -11.0) 4.0 (2.0 -15.0) 1.0 (1.0 -4.0) 14.0 (4.0 -32.0) Enterococci 110 (10-1,600) 1 1429 (46- 36,000) 68 (19-546)1 928(220- 222 (55-1200) (#CFU/ I 00ml) 11 ,000)1 "'Enterococci values expressed as geometric mean 34 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -41 Figure 37. Dissolved Oxygen at SC -23 Figure 38. Dissolved Oxygen at SC -CD M COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -42 Figure 39. Dissolved Oxygen at SC -CH Figure 40. Dissolved Oxygen at SC -GR Figure 41. Dissolved Oxygen at SC -NK Fi 42. Enterococei at SC-23 F c'Levels at SC-C:V, ,nterococ i Fi 43. Enterococei at SC-CD Enterococci Levels at S,C-CH Fi 44. Enterococei at SC-CH 36 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 13-1-43 Figure 45. Enterococci at SC -GR Enterococei Levels at S,C-N J- Figure 46. Enterococci at SCAK Table 19. Ratings of narameters within samnling stations within Smith Creek Parameter SC -23 SC -CD SC -CH SC -GR SC -NK Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen Chloroph ll -a �� Enterococcl M M. POOR POOR 3.9 Comprehensive Rating by Watershed When combining all results from each site within individual watersheds, it is possible to obtain a "snapshot" of water quality within each watershed (Table 20). Barnards Creek demonstrates "good" water quality with the exception of Enterococci, which was in the "poor" category. Futch Creek also contains good ratings; however dissolved oxygen was shown to be "fair" while fecal coliform was determined to be "poor ". Lords Creek was deemed "good" for all parameters. 37 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -44 Smith Creek and Motts Creek rated "good" for all parameters with the exception of "poor" for Enterococci. Pages Creek also demonstrated "good" ratings for turbidity and chlorophyll -a, however dissolved oxygen and fecal coliform were "poor" while Enterococci was "fair ". Prince Georges Creek had "good" ratings for turbidity and chlorophyll -a and "poor" ratings for dissolved oxygen and Enterococci. Table 20. Ratings of parameters within each watershed Parameter Prince Smith B rn r a ads F h utc Lords o ds M otts p ages Georg g Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Turbidit , Dissolved Oxygen' POO P OO R O Chlorophyll - , , s s : s Enterococci .� ' - POOR POOR POOR POOR Fecal Coliform N/A P OOR N/A N/A P OOR N/A N/A 3.10 Long Term Trends Water quality data has been collected within New Hanover County since the mid 1990's. Several of the historical monitoring sites continue to be utilized for the ongoing monitoring effort. In order to assess the long term trends in water quality, a database has been created to include the all data collected within the seven (7) tidal creeks under current investigation. Prior to 2007, UNCW collected data within three (3) of the tidal creeks included in the present study. These include Pages Creek, Futch Creek, and Smith Creek. Accordingly, the data from these three creeks dating to 2004 has been incorporated in the analysis of long term trends. The long term trends from the remaining creeks ( Motts Creek, Lords Creek, Prince Georges Creek, and Barnards Creek) have been derived from data obtained between November 2007 through June 2012. For each parameter examined, data was plotted on a line graph over time and a trend line was created. Trend lines, also known as regression lines, can be used as a way of visually depicting the relationship between the independent (x) and dependent (y) variables in the graph. In this case the independent variable is time and the dependent variable is the water quality parameter. A trend in water quality is defined as an increase or decrease in a particular constituent concentration over time. Statistical analysis was not performed; therefore the significance of these long term trends should be interpreted with caution. 3.10.1 Dissolved Oxygen Figures 47 -53 depicts the long term trends in dissolved oxygen within the seven (7) creeks examined within this study. The figures illustrate a distinct seasonal pattern including higher dissolved oxygen during the cooler winter months and lower dissolved oxygen during the warmer summer months. Generally speaking, the dissolved oxygen levels within each creek have not changed drastically from year to year. The apparent increasing trend line associated with Smith Creek is not necessarily representative of an actual improvement in dissolved oxygen levels due to the fact that sampling was only conducted seasonally between 2004 and 2006 thereby skewing the data. Since 2007, dissolved oxygen levels exceeded the State standard within surface samples 32 %, 29 %, 24 %, and 22% of the time within Prince Georges Creek, COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -45 Motts Creek, Pages Creek, and Futch Creek, respectively. Dissolved oxygen levels were better within Smith Creek, Lords Creek, and Barnards Creek where the State standard was breached 11 %, 5 %, 2 %, respectively. Figure 47. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Barnards Creek Figure 48. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Futch Creek W COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -46 Figure 49. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Lords Creek Figure 50. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Motts Creek WE COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -47 Figure 51. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Pages Creek Figure 52. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Prince Georges Creek 41 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -48 Figure 53. Long term surface dissolved oxygen data within Smith Creek 3.10.2 Turbidity Figures 54 -60 depict the long term trends in turbidity within the seven (7) creeks examined within this study. In general, the long term trend of turbidity has remained fairly constant within each creek on an annual basis, however seasonal patterns emerge. This includes higher turbidity observations during the warmer months and lower turbidity during the cooler months. The trends within Futch Creek, Lords Creek, and Smith Creek have demonstrated a slight decrease in turbidity over time while turbidity in Prince Georges Creek has increased slightly, however due to the sample size, these trends are not statistically significant. Turbidity has remained within the State standard within all sampling sites included within this long term analysis. 42 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -49 Figure 54. Long term surface turbidity data within Barnards Creek Figure 55. Long term surface turbidity data within Futch Creek e 35 30 Z 25 20 15 N 10 5 e Figure 56. Long term surface turbidity data within Lords Creek 43 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -50 35 1 Motts Creek Turbidity (Surface) 30 �D 25 N z 20 :0 15 10 9 31 Figure 57. Long term surface turbidity data within Motts Creek Figure 58. Long term surface turbidity data within Pages Creek m COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13-1-51 18 16 14 N 12 X10 8 � 6 � 4 2 0 Prince Georges Creek Turbidity (Surface) Figure 59. Long term surface turbidity data within Prince Georges Creek R oN o`) o`' o o o� 6'\ o$ o� o� : 1 0 �ti titi o �o o o o o o �o o S - ��G� - OG�, �G.- �� fib .- ��.- 0 � . ��Q ��g. Figure 60. Long term surface turbidity data within Smith Creek 3.10.3 Chlorophyll -a Figures 61 -67 depict the long term trends in chlorophyll -a within the seven (7) creeks examined within this study. In general, the long term trend of turbidity has remained fairly constant within each creek. Similar to the trend observed with dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll -a levels appear to increase during the warmer months and decrease during the cooler months. Since sampling began, only 13 exceedences of the chlorophyll -a standard were observed of the 1097 samples collected. w COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -52 Figure 61. Long term chlorophyll -a data within Barnards Creek Figure 62. Long term chlorophyll -a data within Futch Creek Figure 63. Long term chlorophyll -a data within Lords Creek Het COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -53 25.0 -1 Botts Creek Chloroph 2000 15.0 10.0 5111111111111M Fi 64. Lon term chloroph data within Motts Creek K= 60.0 0--k 50.0 40.0 300,0 20.0 10.0 Ml Fi 65. Lon term chloroph data within Pa Creek MA COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 13-1-54 P r i nce Georges Creek C p s yll -o Figure 66. Long term chlorophyll -a data within Prince Georges Creek 12.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 2.0 nV I r? i rl�� ' Figure 67. Long term chlorophyll -a data within Smith Creek 3.10.4 Enterococci Figures 68 -74 depict the long term trends in Enterococci within the seven (7) creeks examined within this study. Motts Creek, Smith Creek, and Prince Georges Creek have all maintained a relatively high level of bacteria over time. Pages Creek and Barnard Creek contain high levels of bacteria which has apparently increased within recent years. The opposite trend was observed within Lords Creek where relatively low Enterococci levels appear to have decreased over time. Futch Creek, however, has maintained consistently low levels of Enterococci since sampling began in 2007. Since November 2007, samples collected within Motts Creek, Barnards Creek, and Smith Creek exceeded the State standard for Enterococci 54 %, 50 %, and 41% of the time, respectively. Both Prince Georges Creek and Pages Creek exceeded this standard 30% of the time while Lords Creek and Futch Creek exceeded the standard 7% and 2 %, respectively. COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -55 Figure 68. Long term Enterococci data within Barnards Creek Figure 69. Long term Enterococci data within Futch Creek .J COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -56 Figure 70. Long term Enterococci data within Lords Creek Figure 71. Long term Enterococci data within Motts Creek 50 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -57 otts Creek E.t eccc 1.00 t 100 .... R w 0 _ _ m.m .m. _ ..... 1 mm �. I �. Figure 71. Long term Enterococci data within Motts Creek 50 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -57 Figure 72. Long term Enterococci data within Pages Creek o ° ' °) o °� x o °� o� 0 o�� 0� 0 Figure 73. Long term Enterococci data within Prince Georges Creek 51 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -58 Figure 74. Long term Enterococci data within Smith Creek 4.0 DISCUSSION Water quality is an important issue in the region due to the fact that there are many economic and recreational opportunities that are supported by the aquatic resources in and around these waterways. One of the greatest threats to water quality in this area is stormwater runoff created by increased impervious surface coverage (Mallin et al., 2000). Polluted stormwater runoff can have many adverse effects on plants, fish, animals and people. Excess nutrients can cause algal blooms while bacteria and other pathogens can wash into swimming areas and create health hazards. New Hanover County has experienced rapid growth and development over the past several decades. In 1990, the population within the County was 120,284. By 2006, the population grew over 50% to 182,591 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2006). The most recent assessment conducted in 2010 determined the population to be 202,667. Along with this population increase and stormwater runoff associated with this growth, numerous septic tanks, aging wastewater infrastructure, and other factors potentially impact the water quality within the County's creeks as well. With this in mind, it is important to monitor the water quality of these local systems to determine potential impacts to both human health and ecosystem function. Typically, water quality degrades as the water temperature increases and oxygen is not as readily dissolved in the water column. This was observed while investigating the long term trends of water quality in this study. The dissolved oxygen along with chlorophyll -a and turbidity levels increased during the warmer summer months. Furthermore, longer days allow for increased photosynthetic activity allowing for an increase in phytoplankton blooms. While often more problematic in the summer months, algal blooms are less common in the fall and winter when water temperature decreases. High levels of chlorophyll -a and nutrients along with increases in pH and turbidity may indicate the presence of an algal bloom. Throughout the course of this study, pH values were found to be within acceptable ranges as were turbidity values. The lack of elevated pH and turbidity along with generally low chlorophyll -a levels indicate that algal blooms were generally not a problem. In fact, no algal blooms were identified within any sampling site during the course of this study. 52 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -59 The chemical parameter nitrate /nitrite showed a marked difference between the tidal creeks located in proximity to the Intracoastal Waterway and the creeks flowing into the Cape Fear River. The nitrate /nitrite levels were approximately an order of magnitude lower in Pages Creek and Futch Creek, the two creeks draining into the ICW. When excessive nitrate /nitrite enters aquatic systems, algal growth otherwise limited by these nutrients becomes rapid and available oxygen becomes consumed as these organisms die and decompose. While relatively higher nitrate /nitrite levels have been identified within several watersheds, algal blooms have not been problematic. A number of sites contained dissolved oxygen levels below the State standard during the course of this 12 -month study. Two sites within Pages Creek, PC -BDDS and PC -BDUS experienced low dissolved oxygen during six (6) and seven (7) sampling events, respectively. All five sites in Futch Creek experienced low dissolved oxygen during July and August. Several of the sites within Futch Creek also experienced low dissolved oxygen during the months between May and September when the water temperature was the warmest. Of the creeks draining into the Cape Fear River, Prince Georges Creek demonstrated the lowest dissolved oxygen most likely due to the physical setting surrounding the creek. PG -CH and PG -NC demonstrated low dissolved oxygen four (4) and eight (8) times of the thirteen (13) times sampled, respectively. This portion of the creek is characterized by a broad shallow bank in a swamp -like setting. It is typical of swamps to contain low levels of dissolved oxygen and higher levels of pH, as observed. Therefore, the low dissolved oxygen observed in Prince Georges Creek, particularly at PG -NC and PG -CH could be regarded as a natural phenomenon. High levels of Enterococci bacteria persisted within five (5) of the seven (7) watersheds throughout the study period. Samples collected from Futch Creek did not contain any samples with levels of Enterococci above the State standard while Lords Creek contained only one exceedence. Enterococci levels exceeded the State standard in individual sampling sites within Prince Georges Creek, Smith Creek, Pages Creek, Barnards Creek, and Motts Creek 28 %, 40 %, 26 %, 69 %, and 77% of the time, respectively. The site with the most frequent high concentrations of Enterococci bacteria were located within Motts Creek as all thirteen samples taken from Normandy Drive exceeded the State standard. The headwaters of Smith Creek (SC- CD also contained high levels of Enterococci on a consistent basis as eleven of the thirteen sampling events exceeded the standard. The source of the contamination remains unclear at this time and further investigation in this area is warranted. Along with Enterococci, fecal coliform bacteria were tested within Pages Creek and Futch Creek. A very high percentage of samples exceeded the single- sample NCDENR Shellfish Sanitation standard of 14 CFU /100ml within these creeks. In fact, 54% of all samples collected within Futch Creek exceeded this standard. Sixty -nine percent (69 %) of all samples collected within Pages Creek also exceeded this standard. Sources of nutrient and fecal bacteria pollutants can include fertilizers, septic system leachate, leaking sewer mains, wild and domestic animal wastes, and overland runoff (Spivey, 2008). In order to understand and manage fecal bacteria pollution in any body of water, one must first be able to identify the source of the pollution (Kelsey et al. 2004). Previous studies have concluded 53 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -60 that increasing the amount of impervious surface coverage increases runoff, stream flow, and the amount of pollutants reaching surface waters (Griffin et al, 1990; Schueler, 1994, Mallin, 2001). Mallin et al. (2000) determined a strong correlation between impervious surface coverage and fecal coliform bacteria levels in New Hanover County. Higher impervious surface coverage was found to correlate with a higher geometric mean of fecal coliform bacteria within individual watersheds. New Hanover County has experienced high rates of growth over the past several decades. Along with population increases, the associated development of buildings, roadways, and parking lots within the County has created increased areas of impervious surface coverage. These pollutants include hydrocarbons, bacteria, and nutrients including nitrogen. Major sources of anthropogenic nitrogen are fertilizer application, wastewater disposal and atmospheric deposition (Howarth and Marino, 2006). The conversion of natural landscapes to impervious surfaces removes the natural filtration capacity of the land, thereby facilitating increased concentration of pollutants migrating directly into waterways. An assessment of the impervious surface coverage within the watersheds of New Hanover County was performed (Hume, 2008). Impervious surface percentages were determined to be 10.1 % in Prince Georges Creek watershed, 11.0% in Futch Creek watershed, 12.6% in Lords Creek watershed, in 13.5% Motts Creek watershed, 16.9% in Barnards Creek watershed, 21.9% in Smith Creek watershed, and 23.3% in Pages Creek watershed. Another potential source of degraded water quality could originate from failing sewage and septic systems. A source tracking study found bacteria originating from humans, ruminants, and canines within six (6) tidal creeks in New Hanover County (Spivey, 2008). In the New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Report 2008 -2009, it was reported that human borne fecal bacteria was also present within two (2) sites within Pages Creek. The source of this human- borne bacteria may be indicative of either sewer -line problems, septic system failures, or a general persistence in the bacteria itself (Spivey, 2008). New Hanover County and the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) have investigated the presence of abandoned septic tanks and malfunctioning sewage lift stations in proximity to Pages Creek. These efforts were inconclusive and high levels of Enterococci bacteria and fecal coliform occasionally persist within these sites. As mentioned above, high levels of Enterococci bacteria have been identified within the headwaters of Smith Creek and within Motts Creek. Additional investigation to determine the cause is recommended. Failing sewage infrastructure may have contributed to declining water quality within several of the County's watersheds over recent years. Between June 2011 and June 2012, the CFPUA reported a total of twenty -seven (27) sewage spills within New Hanover County. During this time period a total of 1,456,397 gallons were spilled with 1,455,430 gallons reaching surface waters (Ricks, pers. comm.). These sewage spills were reported in two (2) of the seven (7) creeks monitored in this study. Five spills occurred in Pages Creek with 15,143 gallons reaching the surface waters. Four sewage spills were recorded within Smith Creek during the same time period. A total of 33,615 gallons reached the surface waters. A relatively large spill occurring in January of 2011 accounted for 23,400 gallons alone (Ricks, pers. comm.). As noted above, several of the sites monitored within Smith Creek exceeded the State standard for Enterococci on a regular basis, however these sites are located upstream from the sewer spills. Two (2) of the three (3) sites monitored within Pages Creek exceeded the standard for both fecal coliform and Enterococci bacteria on a regular basis as well. Although sampling was not conducted 54 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -61 immediately following these spills, it is possible that the bacteria released into the creeks settled into the sediments where they persisted over time. Seven (7) of the twenty -seven (27) spills reported between June 2011 and June 2012 were attributed by material (including grease, paper, and baby wipes) clogged in sewer lines. Eleven (11) spills were attributed to equipment or pipe failures. Several of the spills were caused by severe natural conditions when heavy rains caused the system to overfill In order to minimize future spills, the CPFUA has initiated a public awareness campaign focused on educating its customers on what materials, if flushed into a toilet, could be problematic to the wastewater infrastructure. W COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -62 5.0 LITERATURE CITED Access NC, 2012. Thrive in North Carolina, County Demographics Report. htt-D*.//accessnc.commerce.state.nc.us/docs/count fifile/NC/ . Last visited March 29, 2012. Grizzard, T.J., Randall, C.W., Helsel, D.R., and Hartigan, J.P. 1980. Analysis of non -point pollution export from small catchments. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 52: 780 -790. Howarth, R.W. and Marino, R. 2006. Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Evolving views over three decades. Limnology and Oceanography, 51: 364-376. Hume, A. 2008. Determination of Impervious Surface in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Report submitted to New Hanover County. Wilmington, North Carolina. Jeng, J.G., Bradford, H, and Englande, A.J. 2004. "Comparison of E. coli, enterococci, and fecal coliform as indicators for brackish water quality assessment ". Water Environmental Research. 76: 245-55. Kelsey, H., Porter, D.E, Scott, G., Neet, M., and White, D. 2004. Using geographic information systems and regression analysis to evaluate relationships between land use and fecal coliform bacterial pollution. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 298:197 -209. Kwak, T.J. and Zedler, J.B. 1997. Food web analysis of southern California coastal wetlands using multiple stable isotopes. Oecologia 110: 262 -277. Mallin, M.A.; Williams, K.E.; Esham, C.E.; and Lowe, P.R., 2000. Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications 10:1047 -1056. Mallin, M.A., Ensign, S.H., McIver, M.R., Shank, G.C., and Fowler, P.K. 2001. Demographic, landscape, and meteorological factors controlling the microbial pollution of coastal waters. Hydrobiologia. 460: 185-193. Mallin, M.A., 2010. University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Aquatic Ecologist. Personal communication regarding findings of water samples obtained within PG -NC. Odum, W.E., Smith, T.J., Hoover, J.K., and McIvor, C.C. 1984. The Ecology of Tidal Freshwater Marshes of the United States East Coast: A Community Profile. , U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS /OB S -83/ 17, 177 pp. Ricks, C., 2011. Cape Fear Public Utility Authority. Personal communication regarding sewage spills in New Hanover County. 56 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -63 Schueler, T., 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Water Protection Technology. 1: 100- 111. Spivey, 2008. The use of PCR and T -RFLP as a means of identifying sources of fecal bacteria pollution in the tidal creeks of New Hanover County, North Carolina. Masters Thesis. University of North Carolina at Wilmington. 54pp. U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 Population Estimates, Census 2000, 1990 Census. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984. Health effects criteria for fresh recreational waters. EPA - 600/1 -84 -004, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA - 440/5/84 -002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 57 COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -64 APPENDIX A Photographs of Sampling Sites Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -65 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -66 Barnards Creek at Carolina Beach Road (BC-CBR) Futch Creek 4 (FC -4) Futch Creek 6 (FC -6) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -67 Futch Creek 13 (FC -13) Futch Creek at Foy Branch (FC -FOY) Lords Creek at River Road (LC -RR) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -68 Motts Creek at Carolina Beach Road (MOTT -CBR) Motts Creek at Normandy Drive (MOT -ND) Pages Creek at Bayshore Drive Upstream (PC -BDUS) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -69 Pages Creek at Bayshore Drive (PC-BDDS) Pages Creek Mouth (PC -M) Prince Georges Creek at Castle Hayne Road (PG -CH) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -70 Prince Georges Creek at Marathon Landing (PG -ML) Prince Georges Creek at North College Road (PG -NC) Smith Creek at Candlewood Drive (SC-CD) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13-1-71 Smith Creek at Castle Hayne Road (SC -CH) Smith Creek at 23 Street (SC -23) Smith Creek at North Kerr Ave. (SC -NK) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -72 Smith Creek at Gordon Road (SC -GR) APPENDIX Raw Data Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 13 -1 -73 06/20/2012 13 -1 -74 Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O O O O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O O W N N O M O M N N o0 O . oo . � . `O . O� - - r--� • O - M • N - �n - � � - . . � �� . . . . 00 . o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O NCl) O O N O O o0 '�c oo al� M M N 1 10 �n � � 1 10 �lc �lc `O � `O ol� 00 C� 00 `O �c `O �c r kn 00 00 �n O O O M `O M C� M M C1 � �n � `O 00 't N O N r--� �n � kn �c --+ N �n kn kn �n 00 00 N O rM C1 N 00 N kn N all� N `O M M m N O 00 r* � 00 00 C*� r M kn r--+ `O CNN M kn r--� r* 00 00 A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •� r--+ --+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N M $o rd f C m ssio ers Me tin 06/20/2012 13 -1 -74 13 -1 -75 CNN cM rn M N 00 M 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d1 O 00 00 kn �n 00 00 00 00 O O 41 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M 41 `O 00 01 r--+ 00 00 r M M N M M kn 00 00 O C� �n M ll�t C� Q r--a 00 00 N 00 M Q 00 M M 01 O Q M M M M O Q . ) O N 00 00 M C1 t-- t � � 00 00 � O 00 00 � O o0 00 Q � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O O O O O O N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O M M N N N N N N N N N N o rd cf Ummissioners Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -75 13 -1 -76 N M N r--a M N M N CIA r--� N O O O O O O O O O rn M N O M M O O O C*� O O � � 00 00 l— 00 0") C1 0") O � O � � 00 00 O O � C1 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 O N N N O N O N �--+ O� kn N 00 M� `O r- M O O all) 00 00 00 00 00 00 `O `O N �n d1 00 M M 00 00 (� M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �O N M M M 00 O `O 00 00 M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M �o 00 O 00 M N N M O 00 O O� M 00 �n N `o `O O �n �n M `0 00 00 � M �n M �n �10 00 01 01 O O M � oo M 00 M `O N N �n O� - O O o0 O� �n �n - �n M M M M M M kn kn �n M kn �n r--+ --+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M r--+ N r--+ r--� ,--+ M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O O N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N M N N O O M M M N N O Bo rd qf C mm ssiolners, Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -76 13 -1 -77 O O O O 00 00 `O 00 00 00 00 00 O O . 00 . 00 . 00 . . 00 . . l� . . l� . l� . . l� . . l� . . . l� . . l� . . l� . l� . . l� . . l� . . 00 . 00 . O O O O 00 00 `O 00 O M O �10 l— 110 l� l� `O 110 l— � r- � � � `O � r--+ � 00 00 l� N M 00 00 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 00 � O O o0 �+ N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 00 M o0 00 M N 00 `O N O H 00 r--+ `O O M `O M `O r--a � N NC� O N 000 N O Q M N O o0 r--� C� cl� C� 00 O O M O O O O l� 00 — .4 M N N 00 00 r--� �,c 00 C� O M `O C1 00 cl� C� 00 C� O O C� cl� O O 00 00 Q Q-) Q Q-) N M 00 00 (� M M M M M M M M M N r-� Q `O �n O O 00 . . . . . . . . . . . O . N . N . M . M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N N N N N 0O r--a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M N N M M O O O O Qn Q O O O O O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N O 00 00 00 00 kn kn 00 00 C� o l� r-- + r .. Bo rd df C mm ssi ersl Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -77 13 -1 -78 o0 00 00 oo �n N N r--a N N M 00 O 110 O M O N N �--+ 00 o0 O CNN `c � � `o �lc �n kn �c `o al� 0*� 0*� al� Cl) C*� `o o0 o0 00 �n r--+ . M . . . . 00 . . . �n . O . O . 00 . . `O . . O . O . O . O . r--� . r--� . kn . kn . O . oo . c) . M . O . O . O �n M (� M M M M M M r--a r--� M M M M N o0 C O � � M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N M M 00 M M M O M N N M M M kn 00 M C� (n 00 r--a � (n r � � M �n `c �,c `O M �,c � V kn 00 M kn 1 00 a� C� a� O o0 00 V'� `O �,O `O C O O o0 C� 00 00 C� C� 00 00 C� O C� C� C� a") C� 0") r--+ --1 N N M � C� a O N M M O O 00 M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N o0 O O O o0 00 M . - - - - - - - - - - M - M - - - - - o0 - 0o - O O N N M M `O 00 00 r--� 00 OC r--+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O O O O O M M . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O N N O O O O O 00 o0 o0 00 (n kn M M E er N M Bo rd f C mm ssi s Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -78 13 -1 -79 M M N N N N N O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 N 0 C 0 O 00 CD 1 10 O 00 O O 00 S O �+ O �+ N N 00 O �+ 00 � M �+ � O0 O O O O � M M r--+ `O r--� 00 l— O r--a M �n � kn M N 00 00 C� O C1 � 00 M M M O O 00 a1 M N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O M O � 00 � 00 `O r--a `O �n 00 O M N 00 `O a `O N N �lc � `O � C� N � N M kn �n � �10 �10 � � kn M r--a O N N r� O M N M �n kn oo �C O N o0 00 �,O 00 N M N �n kn r `o �n r N M N � �10 � 00 00 N 00 M M kn 00 O 00 O �10 M O O � V') kn M kn N 00 N 00 C� r--a M N N O 00 00 � M V N 00 �10 kn oo N 00 `O 00 O 00 C O M M M N M M M M M N M �n M N N M N N N N r--a lf� �n O o0 00 C. O o0 M M M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O O O O r--.q O O O O O O N O N O O O O N O N M M N N M r� N O N r� r� `O M N M N O N r--a r--a `O \ M \ \ \ �n \ kn \ � \ ` O O �, N r--+ IssionersiMqting N M � kn � O r--� \ NN \ \ \ M BolrTcf C mm 08/20/2012 13 -1 -79 13 -1 -80 M 52 r1r) CNN � `O 1 N M r--4 � M o0 kn Qn � O O N O N r--� r--a r--a M M M X 0 r--� 0 r--a o0 �n � �n kn r � r � 00 o0 00 � � � o0 o0 r � kn 110 r � kn �n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 00 o0 o0 C� O C o0 � C*� r V M "O r--+ N "O 00 � �n 00 00 N r M M � o0 l � N r O kn 00 `O r--+ 41 M � O0 � M � r 00 r--+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . 00 . � . M . � . M . . . O . N . . � . . . N . � . o0 . 00 . � . 00 . . �n . � . . O O O M kn �n kn N N�"t V M M M M kn �n N �n kn N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M N --+ �,O kn O �10 r � `O � al� O o0 N � cl� M I ll�t C� O O `O M o0 � M kn o0 kn 00 `O O N `O N M M O ---q 00 0o M N 00 C� � � � O ---q �n kn �n kn �n �n M M M M M M M M kn V'� kn V'� O . M . M . . . r--a . N . . M . . . N . �--+ . . . o0 N . . O . . N . N . O0 . �O . r--� . o0 . 0o . N . �n . M O O M M N 00 r--+ 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O O O N N M M O O O O �n � n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M N . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N O O O O O O r--4 O O O O O O r--a O M \ o0 0 0 oo n n N I r--a r--� r--a r--a r--� Bo r f mm ssi ers Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -80 13 -1 -81 O M M o0 r--a N M M N M O O O O O O M kn �n �n r- oo r- oo r- kn r'- M O O O O a� O C) C� O O O O O�� 00 � . . . . . . . . . . . . . o0 . 00 . 00 . 00 . . . 00 . 00 . . 00 . 00 . 00 . 00 . 00 . . . . \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 N 00 `O � � 0 `O 00 --I M 0 �c Q Q Q 00 � � r--+ --I � 00 M N 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 . M . N . M . �O . �n . �n . `O . . . M . M . �n . �O . `O . . . M . M . . . . . . . v) . �n . 00 . 00 . . M M N M d1 O 00 00 00 M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N N N N M N N M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M r--+ O O 00 N O --+ CNN Q r-- O M Q Q � M M C� O a N 00 -.4 00 M�cl� 00 00 C� C'� C'� 00 00 C1 a1 r--� O `O M M M�� N N O O M M �c `O �n r-: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O O O O O O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O CIA O N O N O O 00 00 k n r--a r--� r--a r--a r--� r--a r--� r--a r--� r--� r--a O r--� M r--a M r--� r--a r--a o0 00 00 � O �--+ N '-' N M I Qn `O `O � � 00 0o C� cl� r--+ r--+ r--+ Bo rd Of Cdmm Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -81 13 -1 -82 rn CIA 00 r--+ r--a M kn r--+ r--+ r--� M kn 00 00 00 M N N �O N �--+ O kn kn M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \° 0 \° 0 \ 0 \° 0 \ 0 \° 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \° 0 \ 0 \° 0 O �n M � O � `c '.4 00 C. M t N N t kn �n 00 00 00 00 00 00 M M M M M �n kn kn �,O `O l l� � �,c 00 "O N O O 00 �� 00 "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 . 00 . � . � . . M M 00 oc M M �n M M m M M m M m M O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 � M � O - cl� C� N � M � O r--� � O O r*- � O � �n kn M M O O kn kn M N O `O �lc N N 00 00 M M o0 00 kn �n o0 O O 00 00 C� A kn O� M . M . . . . . . . . kn . 00 . `O . M . M . O . 00 . � . � . 00 . t . 00 . . . . . . M m r--+ M M `O (� M N 00 00 M M O O O O (� N�� --+ --+ --+ --+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U u u u u u u u u u U u u u u u u u u u U u . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O N N O O O O O O O O 00 00 Qn Qn M M 00 00 Bo rd df C mm ssi ers Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -82 13 -1 -83 t - N M t "o �,c `O r--+ � N -!� r� -!� M -!� N - O Z O Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z Z M 00 `O N kn M 00 M �+ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 M N ct 00 N N 00 N �' N N o0 oo o0 M 00 � O O � 00 r--+ O O `O c) N --+ . l� . l� . . �O . `O . �O . `O . �O . (� . (� . l� . (� . 00 . (� . l� . . `O . l� . l� . l� . l� . (� . . . �O . `O . �O . �O . `O . �O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ ° o \ ° o \ ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N 00 In o0 N O (� M M'n M � 00 o0 N M M N d1 O O M M �n `O M kn 00 00 o0 In M M N N M N N M 41 M 00 O tn 00 M It (n M N M M M �n 00 � M 00 e N O r O . M . N . . . M . . 4 . N . 4 �� . . . 00 . �� . . . M . 4 . M . O . N . O . M . O . N . N . M . . M . N . N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 O 00 o 00 Q C1 O r--+ 00 `O � 00 kn r--a 00 00 M M `O N M C� `O M l� `O 00 C� cl� C� N Q �c O M Q Q O O O 'I 'It N N `O 'I- M Q `O `O M N N N --+ 00 r `O M N o0 00 17� r--a `O B O O o0 O N O r O r N - O H O 00 00 �n 0� O r--a O 00 M N `O o0 O N O 00 �,O M N 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O M M �+ O O O N O O O O O O O M �+ �+ O O O O O O N N O 0 0 . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O O O O O N N O O O O O N N N M M M r--4 M r--a r--� r� N r--4 r- r--- O r--� (� M M r--a M r--� M r--a M r--� r� r--a r� r--a r--� r--a CNN � � --- (y r --a `O 00 o O r� r--� r� N �+ N M - `O � �� `O r � 00 00 C1 � O $ g ard qf Cqmmissioners Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -83 13 -1 -84 M Q+ N Q+ � -!� � -!� M CNN �n 00 O M 00 00 M �n `O o0 o0 o0 kn M M N M M M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 00 00 Qn o0 0o M Q M N M `O N 00 00 �10 00 00 00 00 O o0 `O �O O N `O O N oo N N 00 00 00 �O r M, . . `O . N . �n . N . �O . Qn . M . N . M . . . N . `O . . . . M . M . M . M . . �n . . . . . . . 00 00 O 00 O r--� M M O M 1 00 O rn O 00 00 M `O O 00 `O 00 r--a r--� O rn M r- r--� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O 00 O O O O O N N O O N 00 O0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O r--� N N r--a r--� '� r--� r--a N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O N N O O O N O r--� O r--a M kn �n M M r--a M r--a M r--� r--a r--a r--� r--� N r--a N r--� r--� r--� r--a r--a � � N r--4 N r"I � � � � � � r--� r--a rA Bo rd df C mm ssi ers Me tin �' r---4 08/20/2012 13 -1 -84 13 -1 -85 N � � 00 � � � � � � �,c -!� 00 -!� 10 "' ) O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 00 00 al� 00 00 al� 0*� 00 00 00 00 Qn Q �16 `O �16 `O 4 4 `O `O �16 00 M N M M N N N O N N N 00 r--a 00 00 00 Ql) 00 . N . N . M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ r--+ 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M M M M M M M M M Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O O O O O O O M M N O O O O O O O M . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O `p 00 C*) �+ �+ `O � 00 00 C1 C*) Bo rd df Cdmmssioners, .-� MeCtin I 08/20/2012 13 -1 -85 00 � -!� `O -!� � -!� ' C-� N �+ �O M N �' O O 00 M O N l� M O O `O O �n O 00 M O O O 00 O 00 00 00 M M r--+ r--+ 00 M O O M M M O O O M r--+ O M M 00 M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M 00 oo Oo Oo 00 Oo oo Oo Oo 00 C-) oo r oo � 00 00 00 M O M N 00 00 O 00 O N 00 � Q 00 N o0 Q � kn � 00 � `O N M 110 � � Q r-- 00 r--a 00 N M O � oo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r--+ 00 r--+ r--a r--+ M r--+ M r--+ `p r--+ M r--+ N r--+ r--+ M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O N N O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O 0 0 0 0 N N M M `O O N N M I Bo rd cf C mm ssi ers Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -86 13 -1 -87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . N . N . M� . . 00 . 00 . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O 00 00 00 00 00 O O '� In 00 00 kn o0 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 �o kn 00 O O kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O . O O O O O O O O O O N N O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O `o o0 00 C� $ rd f C �, mm ssi ers Me tin 08/20/2012 13 -1 -87 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 14 DEPARTMENT: Engineering PRESENTER(S): Jim Iannucci, County Engineer and Shawn Ralston, Long Range Planning Manager CONTACT(S) Jim Iannucci, County Engineer and Shawn Ralston, Long Range Planning Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Stormwater Ordinance Text Amendment to Support LID Incentive BRIEF SUMMARY: New Hanover County has a grant funded Low Impact Development (LID) Manual that was created jointly with the City of Wilmington and Brunswick County through the assistance of the North Carolina Coastal Federation. LID utilizes the natural drainage paths of the land and strives to reduce impervious surfaces and limit the size of conventional stormwater detention systems. In order for a project to be considered LID, the project comes before the Technical Review Committee (TRC) and is voted upon to ensure it meets the minimum criteria. If TRC approves the project as LID, the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources (NCDENR) will also recognize the project as LID when it reviews the State Stormwater Permit application. In order to offer an incentive to construct projects using LID, representatives of the engineering and development community, the Homebuilders Association and the North Carolina Coastal Federation requested to meet with staff. The representatives suggested a variance from the part of the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance that requires all projects to control the post development runoff to the predevelopment rate up to the 25 -year storm for projects that directly discharge into a large water body. After a series of meetings, staff worked to define criteria that would meet this request while still providing adequate protection of life as well as safeguarding the natural and man -made resources of the County. The attached LID Application contains the criteria developed by staff from the various departments involved with development services. Specifically, the water body must be located entirely outside Class SA waters and be of sufficient size with no downstream restrictions such as culverts, roads, bridges or pipes that could cause flooding on other properties. The variance recommended as part of the incentive does not currently exist in the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance. A new section would need to be added as follows: Section 23 -347 Variance from the Requirements for Stormwater Controls. A design variance from the requirement to provide management of post- development runoff of this article must be requested in advance in writing. A final permit will be issued to the applicant subject to verification and certification by the County Engineer that the final design meets the requirements identified in the original written variance request. All other provisions of the article remain applicable to development within the unincorporated areas. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth and Economic Development • Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs T1TlV ! \A TA TT1k TT\TT\ A T! \TT! \1kT ♦ %ITT\ T1T! \TTT ["1TTT\ ♦ IVTT! \1�TC1 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 14 -0 Recommendation is for the Board to approve the text amendment to the Stormwater Ordinance to allow for an incentive to be given to LID projects that meet the identified criteria. ATTACHMENTS: LID Application With Incentive Criteria COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0 with the condition that staff is directed to edit the application to remove the exclusion of SA waters. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 14 -0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING &INSPECTIONS Uw Impact Development (LID) Project 230 Government Center Drive Wilmington, NC 28403 910- 798 -7155 phone 910 - 798 -7053 fax Name of Applicant or owner Date of Application Address City, State, Zip Email Address Telephone Number of owner Name of Surveyor (if different than owner) Telephone Number of Surveyor (if different than owner) Address of Surveyor (if different than owner) City, State, Zip Email Address of Surveyor (if different than owner) Parcel ID Number Name of Professional Engineer Email Address of Professional Engineer Location of Property Square Feet /Acres on Plat Land Classification Project Name Type of Project SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS • An application for a Low Impact Development (LID) project must include the following: 1. Natural resource inventory which identifies and assesses high quality natural areas (wetlands, tree cover, surface waters, habitats, etc). 2. Description of all neighboring surface waters including name and classification that receive stormwater runoff from the site. 3. Detailed map with soils and seasonal high water table elevations signed and sealed by a licensed soil scientist. The map must include the source of the soil classifications, existing land use, pre - development curve numbers, and infiltration rates. 4. An increase in the time of concentration from the existing site conditions . 5. Summary of non - structural stormwater management and runoff reduction techniques incorporated into the proposed site plan (open space preservation, reduced impervious surfaces, tree preservation, etc.). 6. Summary of structural LID and runoff reduction techniques incorporated into the site (rainwater harvesting, decentralized infiltration areas, green roofs, permeable pavement, etc.). For LID techniques requiring infiltration, current infiltration tests must be provided for the proposed locations. 7. Statement of the minimum stormwater regulations which must be met, including federal, state and local regulations. Page 1 of 1 01/10 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 14 -1 -1 8. Any other supplemental information should be included that would demonstrate that the project creates an environmentally and hydrologically functional landscape that mimics the natural hydrology of the land in its pre - development condition in order to restore and optimize the land's ability to absorb pollutants and prevent water quality degradation. • Your application must contain a site plan conforming to the requirements of Section 32 of the Subdivision ordinance. The application will be regarded as incomplete until the following items are received by the Planning Department. Your application must include 15 full size folded maps of the proposed Low Impact Development (LID). In lieu of paper copies, a pdf of the complete site plan may be submitted to the County's Planning Department. Applications for the LID are received and acted upon by the County's Technical Review Committee (TRC). The Planning Department will send a copy to each appropriate agency. once written agency comments have been received, the site plan will be placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled TRC meeting. You are encouraged to arrange an informal conference with Planning and Engineering staff at least two (2) weeks prior to submitting an application. By attending this conference, you will improve your chances of submitting a complete and acceptable application. You should bring a rough sketch of your proposal to this conference. Special Instructions for New Hanover County LID Incentive As an incentive for creating a LID project, the TRC may elect to recommend a variance from the New Hanover County Stormwater ordinance Section 23 -347 eliminating the requirement that the post - development stormwater runoff rate be equal or less than the pre - development rate. This incentive will be recommended by the TRC if the following criteria are met without exception: 1. Request must be reviewed, voted on and approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) prior to requesting a variance from the County Engineer. 2. Entire project must be located outside of Class SA Waters and entirely within the unincorporated area of New Hanover County. 3. Must demonstrate that downstream restrictions such as culverts, roads (improved or unimproved), bridges, pipes or other restrictions to stormwater flow may not exist and that additional stormwater runoff will not cause flooding on downstream properties. 4. Parent tract of land must be located directly adjacent to the receiving water body with ten (10) % of the total perimeter of the property fronting the water body. 5. Total percentage of impervious coverage after LID credits are applied must not exceed forty (40) % of the entire parcel. 6. All stormwater outlets must be designed and sized to handle the post - development runoff from the twenty -five (25) year storm and have a minimum fifty (50) foot vegetated filter. 7. The project must exemplify the principles of LID. A variance will not be recommended if the TRC cannot conclude that the project creates an environmentally and hydrologically functional landscape that mimics the natural hydrology of the land in its pre - development condition in order to restore and optimize the land's ability to absorb pollutants and prevent water quality degradation. Page 2 of 1 01/10 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 14-1-2 8. Must meet all other provisions of the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance as well as all other regulations of the state and the federal government for controlling stormwater quality and quantity. I certify that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Property Owner and /or Developer Print Name Page 3 of 1 01 /10 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 14 -1 -3 This page intentionally left blank. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 15 DEPARTMENT: Engineering PRESENTER(S): Tim Burgess, Assistant County Manager CONTACT(S): Jim Iannucci, County Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of Applying for Loan Assistance to Eliminate Failing Septic Tanks in Marquis Hills and Heritage Park Communities BRIEF SUMMARY: The communities of Marquis Hills and Heritage Park are ranked number one and two on the high priority list of areas with failing septic tanks in New Hanover County by the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority. These neighborhoods have had numerous septic tank failures that impact the environment and pose a health risk as well as a financial burden to the residents. Many of the septic tanks in these communities are currently failing and will require substantial replacement costs with no guarantee of avoiding future failures. Some of the systems are so outdated that the septic tank only captures waste from the bathroom and the washing machines discharge directly onto the surrounding property. A team made up of staff from County departments along with staff from the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority is investigating acquiring loan assistance through the North Carolina State Revolving Funds Program to eliminate the failing septic tanks. The idea was discussed at the CFPUA Long Range Planning Committee Meeting in July and was presented to the CFPUA board at their July meeting. If approval to proceed is granted by the Board of County Commissioners, an application for loan assistance will be submitted by September 1, 2012 for consideration. During a conference call on July 31, 2012, Kim Colson of the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources indicated that applications from the County for the two proposed projects should score favorably in the Priority Rating System. The Priority Rating System ranks projects on a points system for funding. Both projects would score very high for new sewer line extensions that primarily serve areas of failing septic tanks as well as being part of the implementation of a basinwide water quality plan. The Marquis Hills project was previously submitted by the CFPUA for loan assistance in 2010 but was turned down because the high priority and need for the project was not adequately defined. A letter from the Environmental Health Department will accompany the application to document the failing septic tanks and will document the need for eliminating these failing septic tanks. Submission of an application does not commit the County to proceeding. Engineering reports and other actions would be necessary if funding is approved. In addition, public meetings would be conducted regarding the issue. Repayment of the loan by the County would take place over a twenty -year period. Other forms of additional funding including grants are being investigated. Details regarding costs incurred by residents including system development charges and plumbing fees would need to be evaluated and discussed at scheduled public meetings. A signed resolution is part of the application package for each project and will require signature by the Chairman. A draft copy of the resolution is attached for your use. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Provide health and wellness education, programs, and services Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -0 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommendation is for the Board to approve the submission of applications for loan assistance through the North Carolina State Revolving Funds Program to fund sewer projects in Marquis Hills and Heritage Park communities to eliminate failing septic tanks. ATTACHMENTS: Map Cost Estimates Financing Options Marquis Hills Resolution Heritage Park Resolution COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved submission of applications and adopted resolutions 4 -1, Commissioner Berger dissenting. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -0 .m- --�� '_ - i l fir _ >. �' � , , ,� �. r En Opinion of Probable Costs Mar Hills Sewer 7/30/2012 Prepared b JWH Item Cost Per Unit Units Quantit Cost Mobilization 2% of Item 1 $ 82, 920.82 " PVC Sanitary Sewer $ 65.00 LF 35855 $ 2 0 39557$.00 " DIP (Protecto 401 line 71,.5 4005 $ 292 5' Manhole Structure $ 8 EA 115 $ 920,000, 00 Camera/Grading/Seeding/Cleanup 20% of Pipe $ 537 subtotal $ 4,228 .p961.81 Mobilization Item 1 $ 18,855.00 " Long 51 ice $ 343 $ 686,000.00 " Short Side Service $ 750.00 EA 343 $ 257 subtotal $ 962 Mobilization 2 of Item 1 $ 6E „ $ 27,00 Ton 30030 $ 810 " 119.013 Intermediate alt $ 100.DO Ton 18769 $ 1,876 " SF9.5A Finished Asphalt $ 82.50 Ton 7508 $ 519,368.75 1" SI' a Finished Asphalt OVERLAY $ 91DO Ton 3754 $ 307,80T50 Centerline onu ent Restoration $ 1,250.00 EA 60 $ 75 Grading/Seeding/Cleanup $ 6,000,00 SHLDR MI 15.5 $ 93 Subtotal $ 3p849. i n ror. # iff Permit Fees - NCDENR DWQ 480.00 EA 1 $ 480.00 Permit Fees - NCDENR Erosion Control $ 65.00 EA 1 $ 55.00 Surveying 5 $ 452,007.37 Engineering Design 8% 1 $ 72%211.79 Subtotal $ 1 Subtotal l $ 10,215p911.48 Contingency 1 $ 1,021p591.15 TOTAL $ 11,237,502.63 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -2 -1 En Opinion of Probable Costs Herita Park Sewer 8/2/2012 Prepared b JWH Item Cost Per Unit Units Quantit Cost It sor Is v ita l Sewer ® 2% of Item 1 $ 32.,490.82 8" PVC Sanitar Sewer 65.00 LF 14355 $ 933 811 DIP (Protecto 401 Lined) $ 71.50 LF 1595 $ 114,042.50 5' Manhole Structure $ 8,000.00 EA 46 $ 368,000.00 Camera/Gradin 20% of Pipe $ 209,423.50 Subtotal $ 1 2 Sanitar Sewer Serves Mobilization 2% of Item 1 $ 6 4" Lon Side Service $ 2,0 0.00 EA 125 $ 250,000.00 4" Short Side Service $ 750,00 EA 124 $ 93 Subtotal $ 349,860.00 3 Hmlta Park AS & 6"' FM Mobilization 2% of Item 1 $ 11.4500.00 Herita Park Pump Station 350 EA 1 $ 350 6" DR18 PVC SSFM $ 60.00 LF 3750 $ 225 Testin 20% of Pipe $ 45,000-00 6" Gate Valve & Box $ 1o500.00 EA 3 $ 4j500.00 Subtotal 636..000.00 4 R,,v,d Re acementlRepa'I"I Mobilization 2% of Item 1 $ 31,576.51 8" ABC 27.00 Ton 14337 $ 387 5" 119.013 Intermediate Asphalt 100.00 Ton 9960 $ 896,,041.67 2" SF9.5A Finished Asphalt $ 82.50 Ton 3584 $ 295.1693.75 I II SF9.5A Finished Asphalt OVERLAY $ 82.00 Ton 1792 $ 146,950.83 Centerline Monument Restoration $ 10250.00 EA 20 $ 25 Grad! ri in $ 6j D00.00 SHLDR MI 115 $ 93,068.18 Subtota 1 $ IP875i.420.94 5 En & Pe�� "fi Permit Fees - NCDENR DW 480.00 EA 1 $ 480.00 Permit Fees - NCDENR Erosion Control 65.00 EA 1 $ 65.00 Surve 5% 1 $ 225,915.64 En Desi 8% 1 $ 361 Subtotal $ 587 Subtotal of Items 1-5 $ 5j,106j2.38.42 Contin of 10% $ 510,623.84 TOTAL $ 51616 Board of Commissioners Meetin 08/20/2012 15-2-2 RESOLUTION BY GOVERNING BODY OF APPLICANT WHEREAS, The Federal Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987 and the North Carolina Water Infrastructure Act of 2005 (NCGS 159G) have authorized the making of loans and grants to aid eligible units of government in financing the cost of construction of wastewater collection systems, and WHEREAS, The Marquis Hills area has need for the construction of a wastewater collection system to replace failing septic systems, and WHEREAS, New Hanover County intends to fund construction of a wastewater collection system into the Marquis Hills area, and WHEREAS, New Hanover County intends to request state loan assistance for the project, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: That New Hanover County, the Applicant, will arrange financing for all remaining costs of the project, if approved for a State loan award. That the Applicant will adopt and place into effect on or before completion of the project a schedule of fees and charges and other available funds which will provide adequate funds for proper operation, maintenance, and administration of the system and the repayment of all principal and interest on the debt. That the governing body of the Applicant agrees to include in the loan agreement a provision authorizing the State Treasurer, upon failure of New Hanover County to make scheduled repayment of the loan, to withhold from New Hanover County any State funds that would otherwise be distributed to the local government unit in any amount sufficient to pay all sums then due and payable to the State as a repayment of the loan. That the Applicant will provide for efficient operation and maintenance of the project on completion of construction thereof. That Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman, the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized to execute and file an application on behalf of the Applicant with the State of North Carolina for a loan to aid in the construction of the project described above. That the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized and directed to furnish such information as the appropriate State agency may request in connection with such application or the project: to make the assurances as contained above; and to execute such other documents as may be required in connection with the application. That the Applicant has substantially complied or will substantially comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable to the project and to Federal and State grants and loans pertaining thereto. Adopted this the 20 day of August 2012 at Wilmington, North Carolina. (Signature) (Title) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -4 -1 CERTIFICATION BY RECORDING OFFICER The undersigned duly qualified and acting Clerk to the Board of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners does herby certify: That the above /attached resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution authorizing the filing of an application with the State of North Carolina, as regularly adopted at a legally convened meeting of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners duly held on the 20 day of August, 2012; and, further, that such resolution has been fully recorded in the journal of proceedings and records in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of August, 2012. (Signature of Recording Officer) (Title of Recording Officer) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -4 -2 RESOLUTION BY GOVERNING BODY OF APPLICANT WHEREAS, The Federal Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987 and the North Carolina Water Infrastructure Act of 2005 (NCGS 159G) have authorized the making of loans and grants to aid eligible units of government in financing the cost of construction of wastewater collection systems, and WHEREAS, The Heritage Park area has need for the construction of a wastewater collection system to replace failing septic systems, and WHEREAS, New Hanover County intends to fund construction of a wastewater collection system into the Heritage Park area, and WHEREAS, New Hanover County intends to request state loan assistance for the project, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: That New Hanover County, the Applicant, will arrange financing for all remaining costs of the project, if approved for a State loan award. That the Applicant will adopt and place into effect on or before completion of the project a schedule of fees and charges and other available funds which will provide adequate funds for proper operation, maintenance, and administration of the system and the repayment of all principal and interest on the debt. That the governing body of the Applicant agrees to include in the loan agreement a provision authorizing the State Treasurer, upon failure of New Hanover County to make scheduled repayment of the loan, to withhold from New Hanover County any State funds that would otherwise be distributed to the local government unit in any amount sufficient to pay all sums then due and payable to the State as a repayment of the loan. That the Applicant will provide for efficient operation and maintenance of the project on completion of construction thereof. That Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman, the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized to execute and file an application on behalf of the Applicant with the State of North Carolina for a loan to aid in the construction of the project described above. That the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized and directed to furnish such information as the appropriate State agency may request in connection with such application or the project: to make the assurances as contained above; and to execute such other documents as may be required in connection with the application. That the Applicant has substantially complied or will substantially comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable to the project and to Federal and State grants and loans pertaining thereto. Adopted this the 20 day of August 2012 at Wilmington, North Carolina. (Signature) (Title) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15-5-1 CERTIFICATION BY RECORDING OFFICER The undersigned duly qualified and acting Clerk to the Board of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners does herby certify: That the above /attached resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution authorizing the filing of an application with the State of North Carolina, as regularly adopted at a legally convened meeting of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners duly held on the 20 day of August, 2012; and, further, that such resolution has been fully recorded in the journal of proceedings and records in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of August, 2012. (Signature of Recording Officer) (Title of Recording Officer) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 15 -5 -2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 16 DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Reappointment of Roger L. Kelley as Tax Administrator BRIEF SUMMARY: As required by NCGS 105 -294, at the appropriate meeting, the Board of County Commissioners must appoint a County Tax Assessor (Tax Administrator). The incumbent administrator, Roger L. Kelley, has met all the qualifications required for holding the position and has fulfilled the continued instruction required to maintain qualifications as defined by statute for the position. He has demonstrated the competency and knowledge required to perform the essential duties required of the tax administrator and the ability to lead a staff that supports the mission of New Hanover County. His current appointment expires on August 16, 2012. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management Hire, develop and retain talented people RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: GS 105 -294 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a county assessor to serve a term of not less than two nor more than four years. Based on the incumbent's competency and knowledge, and a quality staff focused on its mission, recommend the Board reappoint Roger L. Kelley as the Tax Administrator for a term of two years (August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014). e rare ru_ 41P1V rc• Request for Reappointment County Manager Recommendation Letter Tax Administrator Oath of Office COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend reappointment of Roger L. Kelley for a two -year term. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Reappointed Roger L. Kelley for a two -year term by a vote of 5 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 16 -0 August 6, 2012 NEW ANOVER COUNTY TAX DEPARTMENT 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 190 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1671 TELEPHONE (910)798 -7300 FAX (910) - 798 -7310 Chris Coud riet, County Manager Re: Reappointment of Roger L. Kelley as Tax Administrator Roger L. Kelley Tax Administrator Jeffery Niebauer Asst. Tax Administrator Michelle Harrell Collector of Revenue As required by NCGS 105 -294, on August 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners appointed me as Tax Administrator for a term of 2 years, ending on August 16, 2012. NCGS 105 -294 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a county assessor to serve a term of not less than two years nor more than four years. I respectfully request the Board of Commissioners to reappoint me for another term as Tax Administrator at the Board of Commissioners meeting on August 20, 2012. I will gladly accept another two year term but would entertain a four year term to carry me thru the next county wide reappraisal in 2016. Respectfully, Elte Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 16 -1 -1 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR STE 195 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1732 TELEPHONE (910) 798 -7184 FAX (910) 798 -7277 August 10, 2012 New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Chris Coudriet, County Manager Reappointment of Tax Administrator and Tax Collector CHRIS CGUDRIET County Manager AVRIL M. PINDER, CPA Assistant County Manager TIM BURGESS Assistant County Manager As required by NCGS 105 -294, at the appropriate meeting, the Board of County Commissioners must appoint a County Tax Assessor (Tax Administrator). The incumbent administrator, Roger L. Kelley, whose term is expiring August 16, 2012, has met all the qualifications required for holding the position and has fulfilled the continued instruction required to maintain qualifications as defined by statute for the position. He has demonstrated the competency and knowledge required to perform the essential duties required of the tax administrator and the ability to lead a staff that supports the mission of New Hanover County. GS 105 -294 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a county assessor to serve a term of not less than two nor more than four years. Based on the incumbent's competency and knowledge, and a quality staff focused on its mission, I recommend the Board reappoint Roger L. Kelley as the Tax Administrator for a term of two years (August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014). GS 105 -349 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a tax collector to serve for a term to be determined by the appointing body. I recommend the Board reappoint Marion D. Harrell, whose term is expiring August 16, 2012, as the Tax Collector (Collector of Revenue) for a term of two years (August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014). The Board needs to consider appointments at its August 20 meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 16-2-1 NEW ANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Oath of Office Tax Administrator I, Roger L. Kelley, do solemnly swear that I will support and maintain the Constitution and laws of the United States, and the Constitution and laws of North Carolina not inconsistent therewith, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of my office as Tax Administrator from August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014 to the best of my ability, according to law and that I will not allow my actions as assessor to be influenced by personal or political friendships or obligations, so help me God. Roger L. Kelley Sworn to and subscribed before me this the twentieth day of August, 2012. Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 16 -3 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 17 DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Roger L. Kelley, Tax Administrator CONTACT(S): Roger L. Kelley, Tax Administrator SUBJECT: Consideration of Reappointment of Marion D. Harrell as Collector of Revenue and Charge of 2012 Levy BRIEF SUMMARY: As required by NCGS 105 -349, and 105 -321 consideration for reappointment of the Tax Collector (Collector of Revenue), and charge for the 2012 levy are submitted to the Board. Marion D. Harrell's current appointment expires on August 16, 2012. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Effective County Management • Hire, develop and retain talented people RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Reappoint Marion D. Harrell as Tax Collector (in New Hanover County this position is called Collector of Revenue) for the period of August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014. NCGS 105 -349 authorizes the governing body of each county to appoint a tax collector to serve a term to be determined by the appointing body. In addition, it is recommended the Board charge the collector with the 2012 levy. If approved, the Chairman, Clerk to the Board and Collector must sign the charge sheet. e TT e C14XJF.NTC - County Manager Recommendation Letter Oath of Office Tax Collector 2012 Charge Sheet COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Appoint Marion D. Harrell as Collector of Revenue for a two -year term and charge her with collection of the 2012 levy. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Appointed Marion D. Harrell as Collector of Revenue for a two -year term by a vote of 5 -0. Charged Marion D. Harrell with collection of the 2012 levy 5 -0. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 17 -0 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR STE 195 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1732 TELEPHONE (910) 798 -7184 FAX (910) 798 -7277 August 10, 2012 New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Chris Coudriet, County Manager Reappointment of Tax Administrator and Tax Collector CHRIS CGUDRIET County Manager AVRIL M. PINDER, CPA Assistant County Manager TIM BURGESS Assistant County Manager As required by NCGS 105 -294, at the appropriate meeting, the Board of County Commissioners must appoint a County Tax Assessor (Tax Administrator). The incumbent administrator, Roger L. Kelley, whose term is expiring August 16, 2012, has met all the qualifications required for holding the position and has fulfilled the continued instruction required to maintain qualifications as defined by statute for the position. He has demonstrated the competency and knowledge required to perform the essential duties required of the tax administrator and the ability to lead a staff that supports the mission of New Hanover County. GS 105 -294 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a county assessor to serve a term of not less than two nor more than four years. Based on the incumbent's competency and knowledge, and a quality staff focused on its mission, I recommend the Board reappoint Roger L. Kelley as the Tax Administrator for a term of two years (August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014). GS 105 -349 authorizes the Board of County Commissioners of each county to appoint a tax collector to serve for a term to be determined by the appointing body. I recommend the Board reappoint Marion D. Harrell, whose term is expiring August 16, 2012, as the Tax Collector (Collector of Revenue) for a term of two years (August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014). The Board needs to consider appointments at its August 20 meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 17 -1 -1 NEW ANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Oath of Office Collector of Revenue I, Marion D. Harrell, do solemnly swear that I will support and maintain the Constitution and laws of the United States, and the Constitution and laws of North Carolina not inconsistent therewith, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of my office as Collector of Revenue from August 20, 2012 until August 20, 2014 to the best of my ability, according to law and that I will not allow my actions as tax collector to be influenced by personal or political friendships or obligations, so help me God. Marion D. Harrell Sworn to and subscribed before me this the twentieth day of August, 2012. Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 17-2-1 August 20, 2012 State of North Carolina County of New Hanover To the Collector of Revenue of New Hanover County: You are hereby authorized, empowered and commanded to collect the taxes set forth in the tax records filed in the office of the Tax Administrator and in the tax receipts herewith delivered to you, in the amounts and from the taxpayers likewise therein set forth. Such taxes are hereby declared to be a first lien upon all real property of the respective taxpayers in the County of New Hanover and all jurisdictions therein and this order shall be a full and sufficient authority to direct, require and enable you to levy on and sell any real or personal property of such taxpayers for and on account thereof, in accordance with the law. Witness my hand and official seal this 20 th day of August 2012. Ted Davis, Jr., Chairman New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Attest: Sheila Schult, Clerk to the Board New Hanover County I, Marion D. Harrell, Collector of Revenue of New Hanover County, hereby acknowledge receipt of tax books for real estate and personal property of for Cape Fear, Federal Point, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, Harnett, Wrightsville Beach, Masonboro and Wilmington Townships for New Hanover County. Marion D. Harrell, Collector of Revenue New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 17-3-1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 REGULAR ITEM: 18 DEPARTMENT: Commissioners PRESENTER(S): Chairman Davis CONTACT(S): Sheila Schult, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Committee Appointments BRIEF SUMMARY: Vacancies exist on the following Boards and Committees: NHC Library Advisory Board NHC Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education • Keep the public informed on important information RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Make appointments. ATTACHMENTS: NHC Library NHC Nursing Home COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Make appointments. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: The following appointments were made. NHC Library Advisory Board: T. Gwendolyn Grear Brown was appointed. Carroll R. Jones and Ellen B. O'Malley were reappointed. NHC Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee: Grace Cooley and Mark Edquid were appointed. Mechelle Sheree' Gay was reappointed. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -0 This page intentionally left blank. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD 4 Vacancies — 3 -Year Term (Expiring 8/31/15) APPLICANTS: ELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT T. Gwendolyn Orear Brown Carroll R. Jones X Ellen B. O'Malley X Attachments: Committee Information Sheets Applications Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD At Number of Members: 12 Term: 3 years Regular Meetings: Third Thursday every month at 2:30 p.m. at the Main Library, 201 Chestnut Street, Wilmington, NC 28401 Statute or cause creating Board: Policy for the Governing and operation of the Library. Brief on the functions: To develop necessary policies for the efficient and responsive operation of the County's public library system. Also responsible for making recommendations to the County Manager and County Commissioners concerning the operating and capital needs of the library. Board members are expected to actively promote the library's service program; keep abreast with trends in public library development and to work for the continued improvement of library services offered by the County. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -2 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Kemp Magnus Burdette Unexpired 10/15/07 8/31/08 116 Keaton Avenue First 8118/08 8/31/11 Wilmington, NC 28403 Second 8/15/11 8/31/14 264 -8036 (H) 762 -4744 (W) 264 -8036 (C) Nancy Ballard Cox Unexpired 6/18/12 8/31/13 1029 43 Street Wilmington, NC 28403 350 -8018 (H) Bettie H. Harrison �-' Unexpired 3/10/08 8/31/09 1216 Congressional Lane First 8/17/09 8/31/12 Wilmington, NC 28411 686 -4954 (H) 620 -4229 (C) Mary E. Hatcher, Chair First 8/13/07 8/31/10 1905 E. Lake Shore Drive Second 8/17/10 8/31/13 Wilmington, NC 28401 762 -7259 (H) Carroll R. Jones � First 8/17/09 8/31/12 4700 Chamberlain Lane Wilmington, NC 28409 793 -6401 (H) 619 -6401 (C) H. Conrad Luhmann First 8/15/11 8/31/14 1515 Village Drive, Apt. 3 Wilmington, NC 28401 -7524 399 -7664 (H) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD (CONY.) W* _7 Revised: 6/22/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -3 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION John Osinski First 8/15/11 8/31/14 174 Treasure Island Way Wilmington, NC 28411 686 -2461 (H) 962 -4271 (W) Ellen B. O'Malley I First 8/17/09 8/31/12 249 Wetland Drive Wilmington, NC 28412 • 791 -4333 (H) 465 -1307 (C) Deloris H. Rhodes Unexpired 1/18/11 8/31/11 1005 Deepwood Place First 8/15/11 8/31/14 Wilmington, NC 28405 256- 0281(H) 352- 3229(C) 962- 7256(W) Evelyn B. Smith First 8/17/09 8/31/12 4608 Reigate Way -�'— Wilmington, NC 28409 WOOO 799 -6081 (H) Elizabeth Stanfield- Maddox First 8/16/10 8/31/13 2910 Park Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 762 -5151 (H) 617 -5151 Virginia Teachey First 8/16/10 8/31/13 8713 Champion Hills Drive Wilmington, NC 28411 681 -0320 (H) 520 -0414 Director: Harry Tuchmayer File: /Library New Hanover County Library B/C #17 6.12 201 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401 798 -6301 (Info) 798 -6309 (Adm.) 798 -6321 Revised: 6/22/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -3 FROM :JOHNSON FAX N0. :9103502831 Mai V., , 30 2012 04 : 06PM P4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF CONNISSIONERS b000wmnwraur.uMx awe 17e �+�P28430,,,, COMMITTEE APPLICATION rd1C4M Mjtt : Mw Zwwvor County V ary Advi sory Board IVanla: T - f►endolyn Gzaar Srom d Wa E4WA1N 93 0h93596bellsontb . net Horns Addmu 3224 AAber Dvive wi I Aingt*n , C 29409 Mailing Add s IFf dffemnter (CM 90 Pade) Hone lehorls: 910-794-9359 Fir: 910 =350 =2921 X11: 910 -620 -451 Busing: Yea OWng in Nov Hanover County: 10 mete: Femarle: � Rwe: Agri "; 'Agar. 0 ilr=I�arm�a ion fr; ft pwi m of sssurft a chma4meMn of ft ) ' Do you hirve a family member employed by New Hanover CwnWP lfyies, narpe FinplayW . .. i "a, A owymY WWftW W me 8901W or I 11-dit New �1W h& ft kii-W ffunt " aim, ' paeiivn,wi�h Nsw i�r y adokW" wlth Ar*i* q 4 OFtht N�rrrpu�r gyp► P& 1 POW, *~ d have na w far Iy nwriber erq*y9d bysLch agwiCy (r 1! up on: RoUred. 22 yrs, red. law enforce int. 5 yrs-- NC ' 1e Court/ Arius Lt larobati Pm1W*slon91 AcWd : Nagy - I'ed 1Z Officer's As soc, NsLtionaj Assoc of Retired Fed Supl Vqluntee Ac*F hew 90a Mart of NH c mmu y (2003 - 10) former board Chairman and board member Wh do you wish to w on this l�oardlco nnrl�iee� To contrsb�te . �� poll re.�.�tvr� curt, , At and oversight to the organization and Now Hanove Co=ty QCr~ orb Is board rnafib�r bol o &Aft h" a ewa or. p al oo* of tmreat an pwiecdirlasm dd member MoW at k M be14f to ft 08W imp of hka0i', 1m b*W*Aft ar puW aaasd Wo iroarshwalAMWa" Ors nskm of On car dWWft 9! Jew ha 0 400$Mft P%Vk or nKWWW "w"Wavano abFio Avd orb in ft f=W arm Tft show r4ft wrmpo FAINS011fte softm" r+aV an ft Irmft . what arms of oonmm *vuld you like to see addressed sed b this comma? Yntozvet amae incl coin i ty outreach dhilftm and sa mi General concerns oply . Quinjiffastivas for seMn : Pr ior board experzencce f ca for 'cr:.tiaa2 revi objectivity, expertise in a variety of work areas t ervigory , somas. Wor k.. lmgal, law enfa amt) Sher municipal or county boardalcommiffi►m on which you am searing: None List tits$ loc pwm nalp , un and phone numbem R E C E I V E D �. Jarmt Nelson, rxec Director, Smart Start of MI Coanty � 910 -915 -3731) 3. Do rothy DaShim1 ■ NH C*uuty School sow (910 - 798 - 5388) jq Cl . Sandra She C=muw.ty ( Dote: r te .• *40 on Aar ►riontl 1 &nd nd #hnt nny may 60 Phom use romwo sidb for addWoml ilnel oard of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -4 NEWHANO VER COUNTY ov B OARD of COMMISSI 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 COMMITTEE A TION Telephone (91 0) 798 -7149 FAX (91 0) 798 -7145 Board /Committee: L 1btj Mailing Address if different: (City) (dip Code) Business: Home Phone: Years living in rr New Hanover County. Male. Female. Race Age: (Information for the urpose of assu . g a cross - section of the community) 1 Employer: _ C p a - t t b, _ (A person currently empl yed by the agency or department for w ich this ap ►cation is made, must resign his/her sition wit h New Hanover County upon appointment, in accordance with Article Vl, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy.) Occupation: Professional Volunteer Activities: Why do you wish to serve on this board/committee? Conflict of Interest: If a board member believes he /she has a conflict or potential conflict of interest on a particular issue, that member should state this belief to the other members of his /her respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict, detailing that he/she has a separate, private or monetary interest, either direct or indirect, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse himself /herself from voting on the matter. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? J U L 2 1 2009 Qualifications for serving: NEW HANOVER CO. ED. ut i ..... municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: List three local personal references and phone numbers: 1. 2. 3. Date: Applications for 18 months Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -5 Please use reverse side for additional comments Carroll R Jones 4700 Chamberlain lane Wilmington, NC 28409 Employer: Furloughed from Randall Library, Special Collections, TJNCW, end of June, 2009, where I served nearly 12 years. Occupation: Randall Library part -time Collections research analyst organizing and cataloguing and documenting personal papers and assorted memorabilia of historic value. Coordinated an Oral History Project recording personal interviews documenting growth and changes in southeastern NC today. In No, Virginia, residential Realtor with Million Dollar designation as well as Relocation Specialist for large national corporations, 1976 -1996. Professional. Activities: NA in mil' on Volunteer Activities: Board Member Domestic Violence Shelter and Services, 2oo7 to present. Member Finance Committee, Board Development, and Vintage Value Committees. Two term Board Member Stamp Defiance Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, at present Chair American History Committee for Chapter. Serve as Eucharistic Minister, St. Mary Church and Shrine. Why do you wish to serve on this board /committee? I would like to share my knowledge, experience, and interests in Library functions toward continuing to improve and sustain the excellent reputation of New Hanover County Public Library. What areas concern would you like to see sddressed by this coraa►itte I would like to provide input to the board for recommending budget matters, facilities and use, collections and policies, and rx aintam a close relationship with the Friends in order to work more effectively. Qualifications for serving: As an archivist - research analyst, as an interviewer selecting only those who have made contributions de t ' ` quality of life in southeaster NC, becoming a valuable reference source for the area. Organization, research, follow through, and recognition of achievement in others, showcasing these resources for the public. Not serving on any other municipal or county boards. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -6 v New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive Board of Commissioners COMMITTEE APPLICATION Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 Telephone: (910) 798 -7 149 Fax: (910) 798 -7145 Boa rd /Committee: elf C C a mml �k Name: Q M4 /k Home Address. • .2AY-1Z (Street) (City) (Zip Code) Mailing Address if different: E -Mail Address: C) Ll� �!� a) hg A , Ile t Home Phone: YT3 Fox: Cell: 1 7119 ' AI Business: Years Living in V New Hanover County: 02 Male: Female: Race: 476104 Age: er: We Employer: for the purpose of assuring a cross section of the community) P Y (A person currently employed by the agency or department for which this application is made, must resign his/her position with New Hanover County upon appointment, in accordance with Article V1, Sec Non 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy.) W.1011,15,-A &,�a#%iOwik Occupation: 2 r 7 yr .� J14 Professional Activities,, used Me 14i01` "�Ca � !!"J Aar4on D/ // r y c WS i om r r Volunteer Activities r �` 116' r fir -I'd ,sirs a. Why do Y .�� you wish to serve on this boardlcomm�ttee ,�* ASe � L� can -Anse A 4 ao K &.ldw Contllct of Interest If aboard member believes he / she has a conflict or potenti I conflict of intel- on a particular issue, that member thould stalls this belief to the other members of his /her respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict, detailing that he/she has a separate, private or monetary interest, either director indirect, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse himself/ herself from voting on the matter. 1 L What areas of concern would o like ? I - W j lu'r�s T !' The• u ke to see addressed b this committee. c y y r,&l A61 ammijiv- 7h see mar ra e 4;�eW Des r el AP5 i - Q ualifications fIs ervin � /� IC p ,��Ca/" /�1 �7 Allew r g C A Q Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: 1. 2. List three local personal references and phone numbers: i 1W + ///C, V - S-AI ---aS/S E C AUG - 82008 - ----- 799 __NEW HANOVER CO ^ �� 3. J�io�e Corey yio - c35o - i�l Date: 7--c2 ?- 04; Applications are kept on file for 18 months Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -1 -7 Signature: 0; Ilse reverse VI de for additional com men is This page intentionally left blank. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Membership: 14 maximum, 9 mandated based on the number of facilities Current Members: 9 Vacancies: Terms: APPLICANTS: May appoint up to 5 1 year initially, expiring 8/31/13 3 years, expiring 8/31/15 ELIGIBLE FOR R Grace Cooley Mark Edquid Mechelle Sheree' Gay ADMINISTRATORS' NOMINEES None Attachments: committee Information Sheets Applications X Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18-2-1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Number of Members: 9 State mandated; may appoint up to 14 based on the number of nursing homes. The Nursing Home Administrators may nominate one -third of the members. Term of office: 1 -year term initially; 3 -year term thereafter Brief on the functions: Each member shall be aware of the general conditions under which the persons are residing in the homes, and shall work for the best interests of the persons in the homes. This may include assisting persons who have grievances with the home and facilitating the resolution of grievances at the local level. Each member shall make quarterly visits to the nursing home it serves and more often if it is necessary to carry out the duties. Statute or cause creating Board: N.C. General Statute 131 E -128 Qualifications: Must be a resident of New Hanover County. No person or immediate family member of a person with a financial interest in a home served by the committee, or employee or governing board member of a home served by the committee, or immediate family member of a resident in a home served by the New Hanover County Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee may be a member of this committee. Immediate family is defined as mother, father, sister, brother, child, grandmother, and grandfather, as well as in -laws. See Volunteer Job Description for more information. Regular Meeting: Quarterly Meetings are held on the second Tuesday of January, April, July, and October at 4:00 p.m. at the Cape Fear Council of Governments, 1480 Harbour Drive, Wilmington, NC. Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -2 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Holli Blackwelder Initial 12/19/11 12/31/12 2324 Jefferson Street Wilmington, NC X8401 547 -3771 (C) Julie Brewer Initial 6/18!07 6/30/08 3107 Durbin Court First 6/16/08 6/30/11 Wilmington, NC 28409 Second 7/11111 7/31/14 799 -4325 (H) Glenn I. Burdick Initial 12/20/10 12/31/11 316 Raye Drive First 12/19/11 12/31/14 Wilmington, NC 28412 313 -1109 (H) 431 -3168 (C) John M. Coble, Chairman Initial 3/16/09 3/31/10 5003 Villa Place W. First 3/15/10 3/31/13 Wilmington, NC 28409 796 -6627 (H) 619 -2829 (C) Catherine Davis First 9/22/08 9/30/11 5613 Greenville Loop Road Second 8/15/11 9/30/14 Wilmington, NC 28409 395 -5512 (H) Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -2 NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CONY.) >7� Revised: 3/1 4/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -3 TERM of OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Mechelle Sheree' Gay Initial 8115111 8131112 415 Walnut Street (28401) P.G. Box 1584 Wilmington, NC 28402 336- 455 -4263 (C) Dorothy L. Grime Initial 12/19/11 12/31/12 5583 Woodduck Circle Wilmington, NC 28409 350 -0672 (H) Robert (Bob) Shelley Initial 3/12/12 3/31/13 6472 Bradbury Court Wilmington, NC 28412 392 -6011 (H) 232 -4062 (W) Denise L. Shuart Initial 8113107 8131108 111 Florida Avenue, #16 First 8/18/08 8/31111 Carolina Beach, NC 28428 Second 8/15111 8131114 617 -7005 (C) Christopher Ryan Thomas Initial 4/19110 4130/11 713 Orchard Avenue First 7/11/11 7113/14 Wilmington, NC 28403 264 -1237 (C) 800 -343 -3401 (W) Members Nominated by Nursing Home Administrators: None Region G Long Term Care Ombudsman File: /Nursing, B/C #22- 12.11 Audrey Marshall Cape Fear Council of Governments 1480 Harbour Drive, Wilmington, NC 28401 395 -4553 Revised: 3/1 4/2012 Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington NC 28403 COMMITTEE APPLICATION Telephone (910) 798 -7149 FAX (910) 798.7145 Board/Committee: Name: Home e vk Add Tess: E Mail: � C Mailing Address if different: (City) (Zip Code) Home Phone: - Fax: Cell: _ g,� v�S Business: Years living in New Han Con . Mate: n u tY' � Female: Race. Age. (information for the purpose of assuring a cross -sect of the community) Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? If yes, name LLY�_ Employer. A person cunendy employed by the agency or department for which this application is made, must resign hiMer position with New Hanover county upon appointment, in accordance with Artide Vl, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Pglicy. Furthermore, applicant should have no imrr date family member employed by such agency or department. accupatl Professional Activities: Volunteer A ctivities. �Ig LA � %-�, ZOP , , � - i . Why do you wish to serve on tip" board/committee? , • Conflict of interest: 9 a bord member believes he&he has a conflict or potential conflict of intetwt on a particular issue, that member should state this belief to the other members of his/ w respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the cordkct, detailing that he&he has a separate, private, or monetary inlerest, either direct or indired, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse Nm.selfAwself h m voting on the matter, What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? !� ,--%- ) , - . - /*- . '14" /1')- ()"� ,, A /-,) ,, - , � k / / Qualifications for serving: Other municipal List three local personal references and phone numbers: AUG -s 2012 dIr 2�L B 0 C C 2 a�g :j�aj-rZ�4 f�Z2- 3 -- ti j �' 59--75 a Date: / c / p Signature Aj are kept on file for 18 months l understand ar+d or committee appointee may b i r ovred without ca ; by majority of County Commissioners. Please use reverse side for additional comments Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -4 MAY-11-2012 01:41P FROM: NEW HANO ER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 23 Govam ont confer Cry S uite 175 W&RhvkA NC 28403 Te*hone {910) 795 -7149 FAX (910) 7$8 Ta:7987145 P.1 COMMITTEE APPLICATION jj0@►dC0r MjW8: Nursing H=n Cmmunity Advisory Coma ttee N 1v: Mark Sdquid E�Ilsll: aiark8p�vun�a , �t Dorris A 1 2541 Costaary Lana #7 Wilmington. RC 28412 Halting Address N mnt: eco) (2O Ccdo) Home Phdna: 910 -506 -5790 Fl�i: 910 -452 -4583 CIIIh 914 -a508 --8790 BoWn : 791 - 0353 Yom nwa in Now Hanover County. ' , 5 Nara: !toes: Fil � Agv; 5x (1"k rm ffW for tho purpose of aaaurtng a aW940dbn of the t RY) Do YW have a famly I e 11lubw by Now Hmover Coune g ym name No E p � y � ; Piney V alley Una tad WIsthodist Ch A icoou�rw wd�h V% 3, 4 � N� W0xmW F�so�nr�el poft's pm 0011UN Oppsaent haw lnR►�#M I�IIy � iniber*n�plb�byscom cants ar dl�pearmt� ()CcUpalon: Church Bus Administrat Professlonel A itles: Rational Association of Church susinoss Aftiuistratars yolunftsr ACII #its. Board fir. Coastal Carolina Zon Comunity Why do you wish to swo this board►aanr I have a passion for an suriang our ■ ani ar■ in long -term vary facilities recteive quality of care, quality of life glad stay involved d r bard nnber bewe h�ANir h�a ea�nlMct or pairrl oo�nbict olide�d on a �rdd�r �hd mrmbM le the other members or ftltWre 00ft* boed "ng b pub& ffs0 s. T'te Wttbrraho W 8M ft nabn+r o1 the oonblo dftft M* h&WW 1. fa t ft WNW* ormono9ry k#&VK *lapsed Morino** The nwv*wshoW# ftM Volt Dn "nov. "atom" Of Con4W111 wgald you like to mw adW@xmWbYrhftCM no assns* rid availadhility of quality of care to all armors regardless of their finariaia l status )r rave, sta.. . Qusl l=oon foravwny: = have nearly 20 years as a Licensed Nursing Ueur hdainiatxator and Prey for in PA and VA before* noving to Wi lmington to be a CRA at VVM Other nulnlclpal or ~ ommNow on whloh yew am mving: N one LM these local p nsl r errncoo and phone nulribsra: 1 &andy lnnss, Sr. P astor at Pine Valiey United Usthodist Ch"trvh 910-7! 2 San Worley, Pastor at United Advent Christian Church o , Wilmington 910- -791 - 5383 3. D r. Ralph lcrnegay, Ratiarld Professor CFTC and UI 91 393 - 1789 :x 11, 2012 we kqU as Me fff 1# m Phmm use rye slag ftw sd0lvnsl s"wre I undrsaed sord a wNbout eau» by & inyiael4►d Board of Commissioners Meeting 08/20/2012 18 -2 -5 MAY 112012 NHC BOCC NEW KANO COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 234 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 COMMITTEE APPLICATION Telephone (910) 798 -7149' < FAX (9 10) 798 -7145 0 AI arwco i f ■" a a i. <_ 1'1A �L Name: a-11,42 E-Malk, Home Add Y . S jkv-7 Availing Address if different: v r) y (City) (Zip Code) Horne Phone: Fax: Cell: � -L r�. - 4� a Z� Business. Years living in New Hanover County: � MOMale: _ Female: Race: Age: (1 Wz6on for the purpose of assuring a cross - section of the community) Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? If yes, name Employer. A person currently employed by the agency or department for which this application is made, must resign hi&ftr position with New Hanover County upon appointment, in accordance with Article VI, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy. Furthermorae, applicant should have no immediate family member employed by such agency or department. a �1 I Dccupadon: Pro Iona/ �Pavlffes: Uv7C� SGC Volunteer Activftfes: Why do you wish to serve on this board/committee? a re OLL let a Lanj t C� i n - Ififfiff a id le of � Ihfw& t. If a board member believes he/she has a conflict or potential conflict of interest on a particular issue, that member should state this baAf to the other members of Naffier respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict, detailing that he/she has a separate, private, or monetary Interest, either direct or Indirect, in the issue under consideraa#ion. The member should then excuse himselflherseff from voting on the matter. What areas of concern would ou like to see addressed b this committee? eo- �_ cy n r, ie mevzf: '004400 ///7 Cyr e �& V �- pe 0 1 , q / , I e & t*;' 7Kh 0 e�l ZZ:11 y Y [qua ifi'ce ns for serving: �° o 17 Other municipal or county boardslcommittees on which you are serving: 3. err De Date: Ica s are Please use reverse side 1 ! " 11 al )r 8 months u J V � 1 5 2011 7 m �oadd of Com fission /2012 NEW HANOVER CO 18 - 2 - 6 BD. OF COMMI SSIONERS ature �rstand t at any board or nee may re d tot cause by a majority of County ComM ilssloners. rs Meeting hf List three local personal references and hone numbers: 1. Dw7 . 1"";7e