Loading...
1975-12-01 RM Exhibits~: °~ PE~TTIDN AGAINST REZONING PROP~SAZ November 3, 1975 To Wilmington -New ~ianover Planning Commission Regsa~+dirxg; Request for the rezoning of property described s the southeast corner of Stokley Drive and ore specifically described as lots 22, 23, :and 24. We, the undersigned, do strong3.y oppose the proposal of rezoning the property described above from R15 to B1. There. is an excess ,~a~' commercial property in the immediate vicinity and we feel ~~-ditional business property would serve no useful purpas?~ ~~ our community. Ther~g is a~a.~~xtremely high accident rate at this particuls.~ ~~,ite and to develope this property for mo ire intense use would increase the traffic hazards, not only for us, the residents, but also for the many people who visit our beach resort. We urge you to deny this request for rezoning, and let us protect our families and homes against the hazards of a business zone. Respectfully submitted; ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~~ x v~~„ flu ~~+~ ~. .~ ~ ~ PETITION AGAINST REZONING FR©POSAZ November 3, 1975 To: Wilmington - New Hanover Planning Commission Regarding: Request for the rezoning of property described as the southeast corner of Stokley Drive and more specifically described as lots 22, 23, and 24. We, the undersigned, do strongly pose the proposal of rezoning the property described ~:pve from R15 to B1. There is an excess of commercial proper~,~r in the immediate vicinity and we feel that additional business property would serve no useful purpose do our community. There is an extremely high accident rate at this particular site and to develops this property for more intense use would increase: the traffic hazards, not oily for us, the residents, but also for the many people who visit our beach. resort. We urge. you to deny this request for rez©ning, and let us pr©tect our families and homes against the hazards of a business zone Respectfully submitted: y~ ,A.~~.., W , ~ ~~ ~~i~`/ ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~~~a~.