1974-01-07 RM ExhibitsThe 0.2 mile access road parrallel to the U. S. 74
ramp at the intersection of U. S. 17 and U. S. 74
just east of the N. C. 132 overpass
Describe toad in Above Space
NORTH CAP~LINA
COWi TY OF NEW HANOVER
RE~LTEST FOR ADDTTIOI~T
TO
STATE T~IAINTA~'TED 5ECOTTDARY ROAD S3'STET•4
TN~P~AS, the attached petition has been filed with the Board of
County Commissioners of the Cour~t~r of NEW HANOVER requester,; that
the above described road, the location of t~~hich has been indicated in
red on the attached map, be added to the Secondary Road system; and
Tr~~~EA5, the Board of Count~* Com,~ issioners zs of the opinion that
the above described road should be added to t:~e Secondary Road System,
if the road meets minimum standards and criteria established bar the
State HigT7~~ray Commission for the addition of roads to the SJrstem.
T~OT~J, TI-iEREF03E, be it resolved bT* the Board of CountTr Commissiazeis
of the Count~r of NEW HANOVER that the State TTigh1•ray Commission
is hereby requested to review the above described road, and to take
over the road for maintenance i.f it meets established standards and
criteria.
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted b~T the Board of Commis-
sioners of the County of NEW HANOVER at a meeting on the 7th
da~r of January ~ 1974, and appears on the minutes of the said
Commission.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 8th day of January
19_? ~t
c~~,~ ~~
Clerk, Board of C 'ssioners
County of NEW HANOVER
Form SR-2 Tdovember 1, 1959 (All previous forms obsolete)
PLEASE NOTE:
Forward direct with request to the Division Engineer, State Highway
Commission.
i; ti ~ ~
~i _
HENRY VON OESEN AND ASSOCIATES i~~~~'13 ~>~ ,
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S TELEPHONE 763-0141
A N D P L A N N E R S ,
~ ~_ ~ ~
611 PRINCESS STREET P. O DRAWER 2087
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
December 4, 1973
Mr. Dan Eller
County Manager
New Hanover County
Courthouse
Wilmington, N. C. 28401
Dear Mr. Eller:
We are pleased to present the attached scope of services
and estimated fees to perform a structural investigation and
report on the New Hanover County Courthouse.
We have separated our proposal into a complete study
or an interim study.
We would suggest our final fee be based on the actual
subsurface investigation cost plus our direct labor costs
times a factor of 3.0.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Very trul your ,
HEN Y OESE AN ASSOCIATES, INC.
ohn R. Andrew, P. E.
JRA/lm
Enc.
r
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Structural Study and Report
New Hanover County Courthouse
(1892 Building)
A. Complete Study:
1. Inspect structural system of courthouse including roof and floor
framing, walls, and foundations.
2. Evaluate settlement problems in floors and walls.
3. Evaluation of future settlement in htem (2).
4. Determination of subsurface conditions and bearing capacities.
(Subsurface exploration required with six borings and other associated
tests).
5. Evaluation of loads and soil borings.
6. Suggested structural repairs and stabilization to avoid continual
failures if any.
7. Estimated initial repair costs, stabilization of subgrade, and
future structural repair costs.
Time - 90 days
B. Interim Study:
1. Same as (1) above.
2. Settlement investigation only where critical.
3. Subsurface investigation taking three borings.
4. Suggested initial structural repairs, foundation stabilization
costs, and estimated costs.
Time - 45 days
ESTIMATED FEE SCHEDULE
A. Complete Study:
1. Subsurface Investigation
mobilization $ 150.00
six borings 1200.00
undisturbed
samples 60.00
consolidation
test 100.00
report 200.00
$ 1,710.00
2. Structural report, estimates, inspection 1,500.00
Total $ 3,210.00
B. Interim Study:
1. Subsurface investigation
mobilization $ 150.00
Three borings 600.00
$ 750.00
2. Structural report
estimates 600.00
Total $ 1,350.00
._
' PLANNING
DESIGN
1 CONSULTING
JOHN T TALBERT. JR P E.
WILLIAM E COX. P E.
ROBERT M WILLIAMS, JR P E
FRANKLYN L ELMORE
JOHN C BLACK, ASSOC A I.P
JOSEPH W JOHNSON
FRED J COXE III
Sohn Talbert &
AIRPORT CON6ULTANTS
Mr. W. Douglas Powell, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
New Hanover County
Wilmington, N. C. 28401
Dear Mr. Powell:
~,~, tt ~`v~a
l~
Associates, lr~c.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
t-. ~,
<'S -~",
i ~ ~~
916 5 SEV ENT EENT Fi STREET
P O S T O F F I C E B O X 3 3 3 3
WILMINGTON, N C 28401
TELEPHONE 919 762-5204
CABLE: "TALBERT" WILMINGTONNCAR
December 28, 1973
Subject: New Hanover County Court House
Wilmington, N. C.
Proposal for Structural Analysis
In response to a request by Mr. Dan Eller, County Manager, we are pleased to sub-
mit to you our proposal to conduct a structural study of the New Hanover County Court
House.
We propose that the study will be limited to the original structure constructed in
1892 and further, that the study will have the following specific objectives.
1 . To determine if the building is safe for its present use and occupancy.
2. To determine the possible effect on the existing building of future construction in
the immediate vicinity such as pile driving.
3. To determine generally when the County might be required to make major structural
repairs .
We understand that there are no plans or details of the original construction, found-
ation or structure available which might be used to determine the sizes or spacing of
the structural components. Thus, in our opinion, it will be necessary that the floors,
ceilings, and walls be exposed for examination and measurements in an estimated four
different places each. In addition, the foundation of the building should be exposed at
an estimated four locations for examination. Those areas which are opened up will have
to be repaired upon completion of the examination and measurements. Our proposal is
based upon all work involved in opening and repairing the inspection points being accomp-
lished by the county.
Our preliminary examination of the structure indicates that it may not be necessary
to obtain borings to evaluate the sub-surface soil conditions. Our proposal considers
that we will reserve this judgement until the latter phase of the study at which time we
would decide whether borings are, in fact, necessary, If the borings are required, we
estimate that four holes, each twenty-five feet deep, would be needed with Laboratory
WILMINGTON, N C. CHARLOTTE, N C. ATLANTA, GA, COLUMBIA, S C ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
'ice` .
- 2 -
classification made of the soils encountered. Our proposal is based upon this work
being paid for directly by the County. We would, of course, assist in the negotiation
for the service .
We propose to furnish the professional services necessary, in consideration of
the foregoing, to produce a written report accompanied by such drawings and sketches
as may be required to depict the analysis and conclusions made in the study for a lump
sum fee of two thousand five hundred ($2,500) dollars.
Should you have questions regarding this proposal, we shall be pleased to discuss
it in detail with you and your Board.
We shall look forward to hearing from you.
Very truly yours,
Robert M. Williams, Jr.
RMW j r/dw
_ ,a ~ r- ~~
iL
Cl ~ ~ ~
- ,~~~'~
~~
!D W O ~ "7 ~ ''O
~ C
~
Oq G i/1 '~ 7d
~ n r'rozc'
n ~
o n ~ 5 ~9c~
+
~ b C~
Z
r
r ~ ]
G
rt W O H CrJ '~v
H
f7 ~C OQ CrJ H
Z
rt ~ d ~
r• m o t7
~
~ z
c~
O rt rt by
r• co r•
l~ W ~ C] ~ H I--`
° ° rt w ~
~
o o o ~
• ~ ~
a
o ~ W
r-i o rt rt n
H r• ru N
F~ E-+ F-~ H ~ ~t
w N o0 ~
o cu w bd
v, o o g rt w W
O O O N fn fD N (n
a m
w t~
H F-' U1
y In
W
In In In r•
~ ~ rn ~ H ~ C
w r+ V o w r•
w o0 o w ~ ~ ~
v V o.
U, U,
r ~
N N ~` H ~ ~ ~
0o rn .o b r• rt
i m
~
i
v o o p'
v~
~
~
r ,~
H ~ ~ H
~ V7
V V 00
C
w N o cn w
rt ~
~
0 0 0 ~
n
r
~
D
H ~ f
L=J b ~
v o~ oo ~ n
N U't In C!1 r•
~
O O O ~ QQ
H
raw w
cn G H ~t ~i
w Lb
w
N o
o rn ~,
w
w
V ~ v, ~ ~
w ~ o 0o ao
w
I'I.) N N N
QO V O~ ~D
N ~ H
~ ~O y
H
I-N F-~ N O d
~
yJ ~i V O
W Ui W p
~ / ~ f~ ~~ ,5 ~~
Roads in Brandywine Subdivision
Describe P~oad in Above Space
NORTH CAPJJLITVA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
RE~ULST FOR ~.DDITIOI~T
TO
STATE T~IAINTAITTED SF,COTTDAF~Y P~OAD SYSTIIi
w~EAS, the attached petitior. has been filed with the Board of
County Commissioners of the Count~~ of NEW HANOVER requesting that
the above described road, t:ie location of larhich has been indicated in
red on the attached map, be added to the Secondary Road system; and
~~~~?EAS, the Board of Count~* Co:cmtissioners is of the opinion that
the above described road should be added to the Secondary Road System,
if the road meets minimum standards and criteria established by the
State Highway Commission for the addition of roads to the System.
I~101~1, TI~R£FORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Couunissia~xs
of the Counter of NEW HANOVER that the State Iiigh~~~ay Commission
is hereby requested to review the above described road, and to take
over the road for maintenance if it meets established standards and
criteria.
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted bJr the Board of Commis-
sioners of the County of NEW HANOVER at a meeting on the 7th
da;,r of January , ],9 7~ and appears on the minutes of the said
Commission.
in'ITNESS my hand and official seal this the 8th day of January
19 ?4
~,~~ ~
Clerk, Board of 'ssioners
County of NEW HANOVER
Form SR-2 Alovember 1, 1959 (AU previous forms obsolete)
PRASE NOTE:
Forward direct with request to the Division Engineer, State Highway
Commission.
/ 7 . ~_ ~.,;_,, ~ ~ 5
Deerwood Drive in Brookfield Subdivision
Describe Road in Above Space
NORTH CAP~.OLIi~IA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
RF ?UST FOR ADDITIOIvT
TO
STATE T~IAINTAIi'IED SECOTIDARY ROAD SYSTET4
WHEREAS, the attached petition has been filed with the Board of
County Commis sinners of the Count~• of NEW HANOVER requesting; that
the above descri'~ed road, t'rie location of which has been indicated in
red on the attached map, be added to the Secondar~* Road s~rstem; and
T~~'FIGFtiEAS, the Hoard of Count~* Cormnissioners ~s of the opinion that
the above described road should be added to th.e Secondary Road System,
if the road meets minimum standards and criteria established by the
State Highti~ralr Commission for the addition of roads to the System.
NOI~J, TI-~REFORE be it resolved by the Board of County Commissicrx~s
of the Counter of NET HANOVER that the State Iiighl~ray Commission
is hereby requested to review the above described road, and to take
ovor the road for maintenance if it meets established standards and
criteria.
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted bar the Board of Commis-
sioners of the County of NEW HANOVER at a meeting on the 7th
day of January , 19 ?; and appears on the minutes of the said
Commission.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 8th day of January
1974,
C1 rk, Board of Casioner:
County of New Hanover
Form SR-2 I~;ovember 1, 1959 (All. previous forms obsolete)
PI.~ASE NOTE
Forward direct with request to the Division Engineer, State Highway
Commission.
-~
~~ ~ ~
~w''''~"~" .h ~`' ~ December 31, 19 7 3
Q~
MEMORANDUT~I
T0: New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners
Mr. Dan Eller, County Manager
y ~~
FRONT: Larr J. Powell
Tax Administrato
SUBJ: Computer Contract
At the County Commissioners' meeting of February 5, 1973,
a one-year contract for computer service was awarded to National
Data Processing, Inc. At that meeting it was decided that the
contract issued in 1974 would be for three years.
On December 6, 1973 I forwarded specifications for the
required computer service to the following companies, and each
have submitted their bids as reflected below for a three-year contract:
Computerecords Inc. $ 60,600
Burlington Management Services Co. $ 59,460
National Data Processing, Inc. $ 59,755
Cole-Layer-Tremble Company $123,600
Mr. Eller, attached herewith to your copy of this memo
are the pi^oposals submitted by each company.
My recommendation would be to award the contract to
Computerecords Inc. as they are a local company and are very
convenient to the Tax Office. They have the required equipment
to process the live-data appraisal work and have had the experience
of working with other counties with the tax mapping system. I feel
they are capable of processing the required services.
Burlington Management Services Company's bid of $59,460
does not include travel costs and related expenses such as telephone
expenses and shipping the data from this office to Greensboro. This
additional cost could be quite expensive if they are required to send
one of their employees to Wilmington to become familiar with our
operation.
National Data Processing Inc.'s bid of $59,755 requires
monthly payments to begin in January 1974. However, our first work
will not be processed until March or April, with the greatest volume
,.,..~ ~.
of wor}c being in August. In my opinion, if we are to make advance
payments, we should have a Performance Bond to assure that the work
is completed. National Data Processing has stated if a Performance
Bond is required, it would be at the County's expense. I checked
with ~larold Wells ~ Son and they advised the premium on this type
of bond would be approximately $1800 for three years.
Cole-Layer-Trumble Company's bid is based on 59~ per real
estate parcel for 1974, $1.00 per parcel for 1975 and 1976, and
50~ per parcel for the remaining 6 months in 1977. I estimated there
will be approximately 40,000 parcels each of the three years.
Request this item be placed on the agenda of the County
Commissioners' meeting of January 7, 1974.
Copy: Mrs. King
LJP{pjr
* ~ ~ r
~. ~ _ n 7
hf !~ 7~
.. L1v
~~
USE VALUE SCHEDULE
Land Classification Use Value
Open Cultivated
or Pasture Land
#1 Good $970jac. Cultivated land suitable for
Good (-) 870/ac. production of crops
#2 Average C+) $820/ac. Value - Subject to soil class,
Average 770/ac. typical management practices,
Average (-) 670/ac. local market conditions,
topography, etc.
#3 Fair $390/ac.
Fair (-) 360/ac. Variations from Grade - See:
Supporting Schedule #1 for
#4 Poor (+) $190/ac. open cultivated or pasture land
Poor 180/ac.
Forest Land
#1 Good $250/ac. Is the land being utilized fully
#2 Average $200-185/ac. as directed by the State Forestry
Service
Wasteland
#1 Fair $150/ac. Land not suitable for the produc-
#2 Poor 100/ac. tion of crops.
Marsh land.
. ~
r
2
The income estimates used in this analysis were based on local prices
obtainable for corn crops produced in the county since corn is the
basic crop for New Hanover County. It was determined from local
opinion, the County Agriculture Agent, and individuals with the
State Property Tax Commission that typical corn yields were about
75 bu. n~~r acre, ranging to 90 or 100 bu./a.cre under optimum conditions.
The average market price (over four year period) for corn was estimated
to be $1.45 per bu. Next, a schedule of production levels was derived
for the prevalent soil classes and management levels evident from
soil maps and local management practices. The schedule is indicated
thusly:
Soil Class Av. Yield Gross Income Net Ratio Net Income
From Product From Product
I 75 bu. 1.45/bu. 400 $43.50
II 65 bu. 1.45Ibu. 25% 23.56
III 55 bu. 1.45/bu. 15~ 11.96
Thus dividing the total net income by the sale price (for open
cultivated land only) one may estimate the proper rate for capitalization
of farm income.
Acreage Soil Class Income
3.3 ac. Class I land @ 43. 50/ac. = 143.55
29.7 ac. Class II land @ 23. 56/ac. = 699.73
33.0 843.28
Therefore:
Income Remaining SP for land only
843.28 - 14,000 = 6.020
~~.. .b.y' ~. .,. z . s ..... __.
,
~,
Based on the foregoing information, the supporting schedules were
3
developed as follows:
Supporting Schedule #1
Soil
Class
~~
~f1
Production in
bu/ac.(corn base)
~ 100
q5
90 Gross Income
From Product
1.45
1.45
1.45 Ratio of Net
to Gross Income
~
40°
400
40~ Capitalized
Net Income
58.00
55.10
52.20 at 6
Value
_~
$970/ac.
920/ac.
8701ac.
#2
85
80
70
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.45 °,
400
400
40° 49.30
46.40
43.70
40.60 820/ac.
770/ac.
720/ac.
670/ac.
#3
60
1.45
1.45
250
25's 23.60
21.70 390/ac.
360/ac.
#,~4
50 1.45
1.45 150
15~
11.90
10.80
190/ac.
1801ac.
Forest Land
250/ac.
#~1 200/ac.
;r2 185/ac.
~k 3
100/ac.
Wasteland (Marsh)
i
{:,