Agenda 2014 12-01AGENDA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301
Wilmington, NC
WOODY WHITE, CHAIRMAN - BETH DAWSON, VICE -CHAIR
JONATHAN BARFIELD, JR., COMMISSIONER - BRIAN M. BERGER, COMMISSIONER - THOMAS WOLFE, COMMISSIONER
CHRIS COUDRIET, COUNTY MANAGER - WANDA COPLEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY - TERESA ELMORE, INTERIM CLERK TO THE BOARD
DECEMBER 1, 2014 4:00 PM
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman Woody White)
INVOCATION (Dr. Ernest T. Thompson, III, Pastor, First Presbyterian Church)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Commissioner Thomas Wolfe)
ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE - CHAIRMAN (Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney,
Presiding) Postponed 4 -0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Agenda Review Meeting held on November 13, 2014 and
Regular Meeting held on November 17, 2014) Approved 4 -0.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1.
Adoption of State Road Resolution
2.
Adoption of a Resolution Supporting Improved Rail Access
3.
Adoption of Public Officials Bond Resolution
4.
Approval of an Application for the Waiver of Landfill Tipping Fees for
Good Shepherd Ministries
5.
Certification and Declaration of the Results of the County's Bond
Election of $160,000,000 School Bonds
6.
Adoption of a Resolution to Dispose of Surplus Property According to
Procedures Outlined in North Carolina General Statutes - Chapter
160A Article 12
7.
Approval of September 2014 Tax Collection Reports
8.
Adoption of Budget Amendments
9.
Merit Compensation for General Manager and CEO of New Hanover
County ABC Board
ESTIMATED
MINUTES
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
10 10.
Consideration of Contribution of Funds to City of Wilmington to Fund
Forensic Chemist for Forensic Crime Lab
30 11.
Public Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S -622, 11/14) - Request by Nexsen
Pruet, PLLC on Behalf of UNCW Endowment Fund to Develop a 195 -
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
Foot Tall Telecommunications Tower in the CREST Research Park on
Marvin K. Moss Lane
40 12. Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z -933M, 11/14) - Request by Design Solutions on
Behalf of AMJB Properties, LLC to Rezone a 6.89 -Acre Parcel from B -2
Conditional Zoning District to B -2 Conditional Zoning District to Develop
a Self- Storage and Recreational Vehicle and Boat Trailer Storage
Facility at 5112 Carolina Beach Road
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MINUTES
10 13. Additional Items
County Manager
County Commissioners
Clerk to the Board
County Attorney
14. ADJOURN
Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will
move forward until the agenda is completed.
Mission
New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior
service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal
management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow.
Vision
A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community,
committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come.
Core Values
Integrity - Accountability - Professionalism - Innovation - Stewardship
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Teresa Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
CONTACT(S): Teresa Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
SUBJECT:
Adoption of State Road Resolution
BRIEF SUMMARY:
NCDOT is considering the addition of the following roads and requesting the Board to adopt a resolution in
support of adding the roads to the state system:
Soaring Spirit Drive, Fawn Settle Drive and Settlers Dream Place located within Deer Crossing Subdivision
(Phase 1, Section 5) in New Hanover County (Division File No. 1209 -N).
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
• Keep the public informed on important information
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt SR -2 resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
NCDOT Request Letter and Maps
Map
SR -2 Resolution
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 1
RECEIVED
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA N H C B U C C
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
November 3, 2014
Teresa Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
New Hanover County Board of Commissioners
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Proposed Addition to the State System of Highways; Soaring Spirit Drive; Fawn
Settle Drive and Settlers Dream Place (Div. File No: 1209 -N)
Dear Ms. Elmore,
This office is considering adding Soaring Spirit Drive, Fawn Settle Drive and Settlers
Dream Place to the North Carolina Department of Transportation state highway
maintenance system. The requested roadways are located within Deer Crossing (Phase
section 5) subdivision in New Hanover County. After the Board's consideration, if they
concur with our recommendation, please furnish this office with the current county
resolution and official road names for our further handling.
If I may be of further assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
'A" /,�-
Anthony 1. L
District Engin e
AWL:jdd
Attachments: Copy of SR -1 Road Petition request form and locator map
District Office 300 Division Dr. Wilmin�tonNC 2840��910�51- �6�5�514Fax (910) 251 -2759
Board of Commissioners - ce er
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1
-^
ki
Al
Rt-
tj
SAPP
Ll
Board-of Con nissioners L)e;;MMM=;
ITEM: 1 1 2
4
1�
%31a3
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 4
NORTH CAROLINA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REQUEST FOR ADDITION TO STATE MAINTAINED
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
North Carolina
County of New Hanover
Road(s) Description: Soaring Spirit Drive, Fawn Settle Drive and Settlers Dream Place
located within Deer Crossing Subdivision (Phase 1, Section 5) in
New Hanover County (Division File No. 1209 -N).
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the Board of County Commissioners of the
County of New Hanover requesting that the above described road(s), the location of which
has been indicated on a map, be added to the Secondary Road System; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is of the opinion that the above
described roads) should be added to the Secondary Road System, if the roads) meets
minimum standards and criteria established by the Division ofHighways of the Department
of Transportation for the addition of roads to the System.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the County of
New Hanover that the Division of Highways is hereby requested to review the above
described road(s), and to take over the roads) for maintenance if they meet established
standards and criteria.
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the
County of New Hanover at a meeting on the 1st day of December, 2014.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 1st day of December, 2014.
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
New Hanover County Board of Commissioners
Form SR -2
Please Note: Forward directly to the District Engineer, Division of Highways.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager
CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet
SUBJECT:
Adoption of a Resolution Supporting Improved Rail Access
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The Wilmington City Council unanimously approved a resolution asking for an evaluation to study the
feasibility of relocating the CSXT rail line that crosses the Cape Fear River north of the Isabella Holmes
Bridge. If relocation of the rail line is considered feasible the resulting affect is improved traffic movement
within the city.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Build and maintain infrastructure
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution Supporting Improved Rail Access
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
RESOLUTION ENCOURAGING THE MPO, NCDOT AND CSXT TO COMPLETE A
FEASIBILITY STUDY TO EVALUATE THE RELOCATION OF THE CSXT RAIL LINE
ACROSS THE RIVER VIA A ROUTE THAT ELIMINATES RAIL TRAFFIC THROUGH THE
HEART OF THE CITY OF WILMINGTON AND WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A MORE
DIRECT RAIL ACCESS CORRIDOR TO THE PORT OF WILMINGTON
WHEREAS, the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization provides transportation
planning services for the City of Wilmington, Town of Carolina Beach, Town of Kure Beach, Town of
Wrightsville Beach, Town of Belville, Town of Leland, Town of Navassa, New Hanover County,
Brunswick County, Pender County, Cape Fear Public Transportation Authority and the North Carolina
Board of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the CSXT rail line originates in Brunswick County, crossing the Cape Fear River into the
City of Wilmington just north of the Isabelle Holmes Bridge. The rail line then continues eastward through
the City before turning south and west again — back toward the river and the Port of Wilmington. The
sweeping path of the rail line thus forms a large "U" (on its side) which, at one time, wrapped around the
eastern limits of the City; and
WHEREAS, today, this same rail line passes through the heart of the City of Wilmington, resulting in
thousands of motor vehicle rail crossings each day and adversely impacting the quiet enjoyment of many
neighborhoods in the city; and
WHEREAS, the City, NCDOT, Wilmington MPO and CSXT are currently working in partnership to
complete a Traffic Separation Study to evaluate 31 roadway rail crossings along the CSXT ACB and
Beltline rail line; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Traffic Separation Study is to determine the need for improvements and /or
elimination of public at -grade roadway /railroad crossings to improve safety for motorists, rail passengers
and train crews; and
WHEREAS, a potential alternative solution would be to relocate the existing rail line to a crossing of the
Cape Fear River close to the Port property, thereby eliminating rail traffic through the heart of the city, and
dramatically improving rail access to the Port; and
WHEREAS, the relocation of the rail line would be beneficial to CSXT, the State Ports and the City of
Wilmington by eliminating tens of thousands of at grade vehicular rail crossings on a daily basis,
improving mobility throughout the City of Wilmington, and improving rail operations and safety en route
to the ports; and
WHEREAS, improved rail access to the Ports would also have benefits of Statewide significance, in terms
of economic development of business and industry throughout North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, direct rail access to the ports would also eliminate vehicular /rail conflicts with the proposed
Independence Boulevard Extension project and obviate a primary justification for an elevated highway
through the heart of Wilmington; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the proposal would provide an opportunity to convert the existing heavy rail
corridor, with all of its related safety and noise issues, into a quiet transit corridor; and
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1
WHEREAS, such a conversion would improve the quality of life for nearby neighborhoods and all
citizens of Wilmington, as well as reducing traffic congestion on streets within the city; and
WHEREAS, such a transit service would stimulate investment in the many vacant and underperforming
properties along the existing rail corridor, particularly on the south side of town; and
WHEREAS, properties adjoining new transit lines in other cities have proven attractive for redevelopment
as residential and mixed use centers; and
WHEREAS, in the interim, the existing converted rail corridor could be utilized as a trail /greenway
linking up with other City trails.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners
hereby encourages the MPO, NCDOT and CSXT to complete a feasibility study to evaluate the relocation
of the CSXT rail line across the river via a route that eliminates rail traffic through the heart of the City
and which would provide a more direct rail access corridor to the Port of Wilmington.
ADOPTED this the 1St day of December, 2014.
NEW 14ANOVER COUNTY
Chairman
ATTEST:
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: County Attorney PRESENTER(S): Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney
CONTACT(S): Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Public Officials Bond Resolution
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Pursuant to General Statute 58- 72 -70, the Board is to review annually the Surety Bond coverage for the:
Finance Officer $500,000
Sheriff $ 25,000
Register of Deeds $ 50,000
Tax Collector $100,000
Staff has verified that adequate coverage is in full force and effect.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Effective County Management
• Deliver value for taxpayer money
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Public Officials Bond Resolution
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 3
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
APPROVAL OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS BOND
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 58 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board of County
Commissioners conducts an annual review of public official bonds; and
WHEREAS, said bonds have been reviewed by the County Attorney and found to be in full force
and to be in proper format.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of
Commissioners does hereby approve the Surety Bond for the Finance Officer, Sheriff, Register of
Deeds, and Tax Collector. This designation of approval is hereby incorporated within the respective
bond as if set out in its entirety on the face thereof.
ADOPTED, this the 1st day of December, 2014
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chairman
ATTEST:
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Environmental Management PRESENTER(S): Joe Suleyman, Environmental Management
Director
CONTACT(S): Joe Suleyman
SUBJECT:
Approval of an Application for the Waiver of Landfill Tipping Fees for Good Shepherd Ministries
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The Environmental Management Department has received an application from Good Shepherd Ministries for
a waiver of landfill tipping fees. This non - profit shelter provides food, clothing and shelter for the homeless
and assists with their transition to permanent housing.
The landfill has waived a total of $78,943 in tipping fees (1549.29 tons) for fiscal year 14 -15 to date.
The Environmental Management Director recommends approval of the waiver request, with a maximum cap
of three (3) tons for fiscal year 14 -15, restricted to waste generated within New Hanover County.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Effective County Management
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the application to waive landfill tipping fees for Good Shepherd Ministries for up to three (3) tons
of waste generated within New Hanover County during fiscal year 14 -15.
ATTACHMENTS:
Good Shepherd Ministries Tipping Fee Waiver Application
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 4
APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF TIPPING FEES
This form should be completed and submitted to the Director of Environmental
Management for consideration of a waiver of established tipping fees. The Director will
review the application and make a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners.
Submit the completed form to:
Joe Suleyman
Director, Environmental Management
3002 US Highway 421 North
Wilmington, NC 28401
SECTION ONE (To be completed by Applicant)
Name of Organization:
Address:* i i
W 4 ( i%j . �J- C . Z-9, -A U i
Primary Contact:
Phone: _( 11 o) La I et - 0 q9 i-3
Email Address: (A c- S &AA NA!' Z s. 00cl s La Pha-7e-o
1.) What is the mission of your. organization'? ` r+tir +�c�� �+ �L C'
2.) What type of service(s) do /does your organization provide to the residents of New
Hanover County") i _
�' C L L �iA1 t iv / V► a
A" r � 1
1 U J � � � ir�.l. i�T 1C� n- r (t '� 'T � i2 A iJ '� Z•r C� jZ A Y►�l
3.) Outline the necessity of this request and its impact on your organization:
{ Ca C G hr` r : P3 �.LA= 5� iLit f t� ill.! 1 L
A NJ A K0 &506L0- 9g5missioners - December 1, 2014
r�"�- ITEM: 4 -1 -1
4.) Have tipping fees been waived in the past for this organization (circle one)?
YES U
S.) Please attach a copy of any documentation of your organization's IRS status
6.) What waste removal/hauling company will be transporting your waste?
f L A w L ,F-
7.) What is the estimated amount (in tons or cubic yards) of expected waste
generation?
Tons OR Cubic Yards
8_) Check type(s) of waste Garbage or Yefuse Construction waste
/Bulky xNaste (mattres s, furniture, etc.)
I hereby certify that the information above is true and aceurate, and that I am
authorized by my organization to submit this request on its behalf. I also understand
that it is my organization's responsibility to ensure that no hazardous or prohibited
wastes will be disposed of.
Signature: Date.
SECTION TM70 (To be completed by NHC DEM.)
I have ed the tippingfee waiver request and
r--COMV1 DO NOT RECOMMEND approval (circle one).
Z
Date: !l r ' 1y
Signature:
--
to, z z-. - V-1
Cc:
NHC Landfill Mgr.
Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 4 - 1 - 2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Finance Director
CONTACT(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher and Wanda Copley, County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Certification and Declaration of the Results of the County's Bond Election of $160,000,000 School
Bonds
BRIEF SUMMARY:
On November 4, 2014 a bond election was duly called and held for the purpose of submitting to the qualified
voters of New Hanover County the question of authorizing $160,000,000 of general obligation bonds to pay
capital costs of providing facilities for the New Hanover County Schools. The Board has received from New
Hanover County Board of Elections a certification of the results of the election. The question in the form
submitted to the voters was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of those who voted in the election.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
• Support programs to improve educational performance
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt resolution to certify results of the election.
ATTACHMENTS:
Certificate of Canvass
Resolution Certifying Results
Statement of Results
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 5
CERTIFICATE OF CANVASS OF THE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
FOR THE REFERENDUM OF THE
COUNTY OF NEw HANOVER ON THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014
WE, the undersigned Chairman and Members of the New Hanover County Board of Elections,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that we met on November 14, 2014 at the hour of 11 o'clock, a.m., in the office
of the New Hanover County Board of Elections in Wilmington, North Carolina to canvass the returns of
the special bond referendum held in the County of New Hanover, North Carolina on November 4, 2014.
1. The total number of voters who voted "YES" in answer to the question, "SHALL the
order authorizing $160,000,000 of bonds plus interest to pay the costs of constructing, improving, and
renovating school facilities, specifically including, among other things, the construction and renovation of
classroom facilities and district -wide improvements for safety, security, technology and building
infrastructure, the acquisition and installation of furnishings and equipment, and the acquisition of land or
rights —in —land required therefor, and providing that additional taxes may be levied in an amount sufficient
to pay the principal and interest on the bonds be approved ? ", was 40,888. The total number of voters who
voted "NO" in answer to such question was 23,140. The question in the form submitted was
APPROVED by the vote of a majority of those who voted thereon at said referendum.
2. All persons voting at said referendum were required to use ballots or ballot labels setting
forth the questions to be voted upon in the form prescribers by the Board of Commissioners of the County
of New Hanover, North Carolina.
3. Only the persons who have been duly registered were permitted to vote at said
referendum. The total number of voters who were registered and qualified to vote at said referendum was
159,526.
4. The polls for said referendum were opened at the polling places in the County of New
Hanover, North Carolina on November 4, 2014, at the hour of 6:30 a.m., and were closed at the hour of
7:30 p.m. on that day.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands for the purpose of certifying the result of the
special bond referendum held for the County of New Hanover, North Carolina on November 4, 2014 to
the Board of Commissioners of said County, this 14th day of November, 2014.
�1 #
Member
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 5 -1 -1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA )
SS:
COUNTY OF NEW 14ANOVER
I, Teresa Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of the County of New Hanover,
North Carolina DO HEREBY CERTIFY the attached to be a true and accurate copy of a Resolution
entitled, "RESOLUTION CERTIFYING AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL BOND
REFERENDUM ON THE BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $160,000,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS HELD FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA ON
NOVEMBER 4, 2014" adopted by the Board of Commissioners at a regular meeting held on the 1st day of
December, 2014.
Interim Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
County of New Hanover, North Carolina
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 5 - 2 - 1
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL BOND
REFERENDUM ON THE BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $160,000,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS HELD FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER,
NORTH CAROLINA ON NOVEMBER 4, 2014
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the County of New Hanover, North Carolina has
considered the Certificate of Canvass of the New Hanover County Board of Elections canvassing the
referendum held for the County of New Hanover, North Carolina on November 4, 2014 and certifying the
result thereof to the Board of Commissioners and has canvassed the result of said Referendum.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS FOR NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA that it be and hereby is
certified and declared that the number of voters registered and qualified to vote at said Referendum was
159,526.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it be and hereby is certified and declared that the total
number of voters who voted "Yes" in answer to the question:
"SHALL the order authorizing $160,000,000 of bonds plus interest to pay the costs of
constructing, improving, and renovating school facilities, specifically including, among
other things, the construction and renovation of classroom facilities and district -wide
improvements for safety, security, technology and building infrastructure, the acquisition
and installation of furnishings and equipment, and the acquisition of land or rights —in-
land required therefor, and providing that additional taxes may be levied in an amount
sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds be approved ?"
was 40,888. The total number of voters who voted "No" in answer to such question was 23,140. The
question in the form submitted was APPROVED by the vote of a majority of those who voted thereon at
said referendum.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a statement substantially in the form hereinafter set forth
declaring the result of said referendum shall be prepared, delivered to the Interim Clerk to the Board of
Commissioners for filing and recordation and published in accordance with law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall become effective on the date of its
adoption.
READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of December, 2014.
Interim Clerk to the Board of Commissioners Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Attorney
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 5 - 2 - 2
STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL BOND REFERENDUM ON THE BOND
ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $160,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
SCHOOL BONDS HELD FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA ON
NOVEMBER 4, 2014
WHEREAS, by direction of the Board of Commissioners (the "Board ") of the County of New
Hanover, North Carolina, a special bond referendum was duly called and held for said County on
November 4, 2014 for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of said County the question
hereinafter set forth, and said Board of Commissioners has received from the New Hanover County Board
of Elections a certification of the results of said referendum, and has determined the result of said
referendum to be as hereinafter stated;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Commissioners hereby makes the following statement of the
result of said referendum pursuant to The Local Government Bond Act:
(1) The number of voters registered and qualified to vote at said referendum was 159,526.
(2) The total number of voters who voted "Yes" in answer to the question,
"SHALL the order authorizing $160,000,000 of bonds plus interest to pay the costs of
constructing, improving, and renovating school facilities, specifically including, among
other things, the construction and renovation of classroom facilities and district -wide
improvements for safety, security, technology and building infrastructure, the acquisition
and installation of furnishings and equipment, and the acquisition of land or rights —in-
land required therefor, and providing that additional taxes may be levied in an amount
sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds be approved ?"
was 40,888. The total number of voters who voted "No" in answer to such question was 23,140.
The question in the form submitted was APPROVED by the vote of a majority of those who
voted thereon at said referendum.
Any action or proceeding challenging the regularity or validity of this bond referendum must be
begun within 30 days after December , 2014.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY
OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA
By /s/ Teresa Elmore
Interim Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
County of New Hanover, North Carolina
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 5 - 3 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Finance Director
CONTACT(S): Lena Butler, Purchasing Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Adoption of a Resolution to Dispose of Surplus Property According to Procedures Outlined in North
Carolina General Statutes - Chapter 160A Article 12
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Chapter 160A- Article 12 of the North Carolina General Statutes governs the sale and disposition of surplus
property. Currently, the County has certain supplies, materials, equipment, and apparatus that are surplus to
its operations. A complete list of these items including a description is attached as Exhibit "A."
Staff proposes to dispose of this personal property according to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 160A-
270(c) which authorizes the disposal of personal property electronically using an existing private or public
electronic auction service.
Staff proposes to utilize the services of GovDeals, an online internet based provider servicing governmental
entities. Any items not sold electronically may be disposed of by any other method authorized by the Statutes
including discarding.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Strong Financial Performance
• Control costs and manage to the budget
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Declare property surplus and adopt resolution authorizing the sale of the equipment electronically using
GovDeals or disposal by any other method authorized by NC General Statutes including discarding.
ATTACHMENTS:
RESOLUTION
Exhibit A
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 6
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 6
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
RESOLUTION
DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, New Hanover County owns certain personal property itemized on the attached Exhibit A
that is no longer functional for governmental purposes by the County; and
WHEREAS, New Hanover County Board of Commissioners is desirous of declaring this property
surplus and disposing of as authorized by North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 160A- Article 12; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the County to sell said surplus property by electronic public auction
according to the procedures prescribed in NCGS 160A- 270(c) which authorizes the disposal of personal
property electronically using an existing private or public electronic auction service; and
WHEREAS, items not sold by electronic means will be disposed of using any other method authorized in
the NCGS 160A- Article 12 including discarding the items.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners as
follows:
1. The personal property itemized on the attached Exhibit A is hereby declared to be surplus
property.
2. The Finance Director's designated representative, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 160A -270
(c), is hereby authorized to dispose of the personal property listed by electronic public auction
and any property not sold by electronic means may be disposed of using any other method
authorized by the NCGS 160A- Article 12, and that said representative be further authorized and
directed to execute necessary documents, transfer title, add /delete items from the surplus list, and
perform all necessary functions associated with this disposal.
3. All surplus property will be sold "as is," all sales will be final and the acceptable forms of
payment are cash, certified check, money order, and Visa or MasterCard. New Hanover County
makes no express or implied warranties of merchantability of any surplus property, or part
thereof, or its fitness for any particular purpose regardless of any oral statements that may be
made concerning the surplus property or any part thereof.
4. A notice summarizing this resolution and the sale of the surplus property shall be advertised on
the County's website and /or in the Wilmington Star News at least ten (10) days prior to the
electronic public auction.
ADOPTED this the 1St day of December, 2014.
NEW 14ANOVER COUNTY
Chairman
ATTEST:
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 6 - 1 - 1
Q
Q
ZQO
w o y
QO
U
U
O
�W
QU
a
a
U w
5 W
o
0 6
w U
x z
O
a 0
O w Z
x
u
Uw�U
O
P4
O
�
xw
z
x
o
o
a
N
Qi,
Qi,
m 0
a
U
U
LU
O
Q
Q
W
W
W
W
O
O
O
O
W
W
P4
P�
P�
00
O
M
O
00
O
0000
p
M
U
U
r`
W
00
V
00
M
O
O
Vl
O
w
z
z
0
U
Board of
Commissioners - December
1, 2014
ITEM: 6 - 2 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Roger Kelley, Tax Administrator
CONTACT(S): Allison Snell, Assistant Tax Administrator
SUBJECT:
Approval of September 2014 Tax Collection Reports
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Tax collection reports for the month of September 2014 are submitted for approval.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
• Keep the public informed on important information
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the reports.
ATTACHMENTS:
September 2014 Collection Report
September 2014 Fire District Collection Report
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 7
New Hanover County Monthly Collection Report for September 2014
Current Year 2014
Real Estate
Personal Property
Personal Property, _
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles
Combined
$
142,340,574.03
$
275,125.58
$
24,830.90
$
142,640,530.51
Scroll /Billed
Abatements
$
(786,395.41)
$
(5,634.32)
$
(848.82)
$
(792,878.55)
Adjustments
$
723.24
$
2,669.94
$
(202.32)
$
3,190.86
Total Taxes Charged
$
141,554,901.86
$
272,161.20
$
23,779.76
$
141,850,842.82
Collections to Date
$
5,662,238.85
$
7,017.58
$
15,360.70
$
5,684,617.13
Write -off
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Outstanding Balance
$
135,892,663.01
$
265,143.62
$
8,419.06
$
136,166,225.69
Collection Percentage
YTD Interest Collected 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ 84.28 1 $ 84.28
Prior Years 2004 -2013
Real Estate
Personal Property, _
Motor Vehicles
Combined
$
2,525,632.50
$
1,775,834.77
$
5,857,444.97
Scroll
$ 1,555,977.70
Abatements
$
(28,180.90)
$
(25,852.30)
$
(5,264.75)
$
(59,297.95)
Adjustments
$
-
$
287.22
$
-
$
287.22
Total Levy
$
1,527,796.80
$
2,500,067.42
$
1,770,570.02
$
5,798,434.24
Collections to Date
$
353,528.04
$
22,437.96
$
211,964.39
$
587,930.39
Write -off
$
18.62
1 $
(94.05)
$
(51.59)
$
(127.02)
Outstanding Balance
$
1,174,287.35
$
2,477,535.41
$
1,558,554.04
$
5,210,630.87
YTD Interest Collected 1 $ 31,526.00 1 $ 5,547.21 1 $ 28,613.97 1 $ 65,687.18
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chairman
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1
New Hanover County Fire District Monthly Collection Report for September 2014
Current Year 2014
MTD Interest Collected I $ - $ - 1 $ 10.781 $ 10.78
Prior Years 2004 -2013
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
$
11,436.36
$
1,366.01
Scroll /Billed
$ 7,511,075.50
$
7,523,877.87
Abatements
$
(77,886.55)
$
(44.66)
$
(120.33)
$
(78,051.54)
Adjustments
$
4,589.23
$
343.49
$
781.15
$
5,713.87
Total Taxes Charged
$
7,437,778.18
$
11,735.19
$
2,026.83
$
7,451,540.20
Collections to Date
$
293,552.44
$
851.50
$
1,581.97
$
295,985.91
Write -off
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Outstanding Balance
$
7,144,225.74
$
10,883.69
$
444.86
$
7,155,554.29
(227.15)
Outstanding Balance
$
57,529.55
1 $
119,656.86
1 $
73,231.67
Collection Percentage
MTD Interest Collected I $ - $ - 1 $ 10.781 $ 10.78
Prior Years 2004 -2013
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
Scroll
$
75,254.65
$
121,130.8,6
$
88,897.58
$
285,283.09
Abatements
$
(1,255.30)
$
(1,262.82)
$
(321.44)
$
(2,839.56)
Adjustments
$
-
$
148.46
$
94.48
$
242.94
Total Levy
$
73,999.35
$
120,01650
$
88,670.62
$
282,686.47
Collections to Date
$
16,466.55
$
274.34
$
15,300.35
$
32,041.24
Write -off
$
(3.25)
$
(85.30)
$
(138.60)
$
(227.15)
Outstanding Balance
$
57,529.55
1 $
119,656.86
1 $
73,231.67
1 $
250,872.38
MTD Interest Collected I $ 1,468.63 1 $ 192.97 1 $ 1,799.55 1 $ 3,461.15
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chairman
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Budget PRESENTER(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director
CONTACT(S): Cam Griffin
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Budget Amendments
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The following budget amendments amend the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2015:
15 -029 Department of Social Services
15 -030 Department of Social Services
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Strong Financial Performance
• Control costs and manage to the budget
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the ordinances for the budget amendments listed.
ATTACHMENTS:
B/A 15 -029
B/A 15 -030
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 8
AGENDA: December 1, 2014
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET
BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 15 - 029
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that
the following Budget Amendment 15 -029 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2015.
Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment
Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
Strategic Objective(s): Provide health / wellness education, programs, and services
Fund: General Fund
Department: Social Services
Expenditure:
Decrease
Increase
Social Services
$153,035
Total
$0
$153,035
Revenue:
Decrease
Increase
Social Services
$153,035
Total
$0
$153,035
Section 2: Explanation
To budget an additional allocation from the Low Income Energy Assistance Program ( LIEAP) in the amount
of $153,035. LIEAP helps eligible households pay their home energy costs. Eligible households receive a one-
time LIEAP heating assistance payment made directly to their heating vendor. The maximum amount eligible
households can receive is $400.00 for the fiscal year. The target population is households with at least one
individual who is age 60 and above or is disabled and receiving services through the Division of Aging and
Adult Services. Household income must be at or below 130% of the poverty level. The Department of Social
Services accepts applications from December 1 st through March 31 st or until funds are exhausted. This
program is 100% state and federally- funded.
Section 3: Documentation of Adoption
This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover
County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 15 -029, amending the annual budget
ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, is adopted_
Adopted, this 1 st day of December, 2014.
(SEAL)
Chairman
I:rI1101
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 8 - 1 - 1
AGENDA: December 1, 2014
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET
BY BUDGET AMENDMENT 15 - 030
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that
the following Budget Amendment 15 -030 be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2015.
Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment
Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
Strategic Objective(s): Provide health / wellness education, programs, and services
Fund: General Fund
Department: Department of Social Services
Expenditure:
Decrease
Increase
Social Services
$18,829
Total
$0
$18,829
Revenue:
Decrease
Increase
Social Services
$18,829
Total
$0
$18,829
Section 2: Explanation
To budget an additional allocation for the Smart Start Daycare in the amount of $18,829. The Smart Start
Daycare allocation exceeded the original estimate. The Department of Social Services (DSS) estimates how
many children they can enroll in daycare. DSS makes an assumption that there will be a certain amount of
turnover. Turnover to date has been less than anticpated. Therefore, the waiting list will not be affected by this
budget amendment. Roughly 113 children are funded through Smart Start funding. Currently, there are 770
children on the waiting list.
Section 3: Documentation of Adoption
This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover
County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment 15 -030, amending the annual budget
ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, is adopted.
Adopted, this 1 st day of December, 2014_
(SEAL)
Chairman
&T4011110111
Teresa P. Elmore, Interim Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 8 - 2 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
CONSENT
DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Thomas Wolfe, County Commissioner
CONTACT(S): Thomas Wolfe, County Commissioner
SUBJECT:
Merit Compensation for General Manager and CEO of New Hanover County ABC Board
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Current CEO and General Manager Dan Sykes was hired in April 2010. The salary scale for the position at
that time was $84,000 to $130,000. Mr. Sykes starting salary was $105,000.
After Mr. Sykes was hired, the North Carolina State ABC Commission capped the General Manager's salary
to $103,766 based on clerk of superior court's salary for a county population of 150,000 to 249,999.
Exceeding their salary limit is permitted when approved by the local Board of County Commissioners.
A classification and compensation was made at the same time as NHC's by Evergreen Solutions, LLC. The
salary range in the attachment for the CEO position is $92,464, with a midpoint of $124,827, and a
maximum of $157,189.
For the past four and one -half years Mr. Sykes has delivered on all the expectations of the ABC Board of
Directors. The State ABC Board released financial information on all local ABC Boards. New Hanover
ranked second as a profit percentage to sales of 15.09 %. Last week the grand opening of the new distribution
center and LBD facility was celebrated. The cost to build was $5.7 million, including land, and all was paid
from current cash with no financing.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
• Keep the public informed on important information
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve Mr. Sykes be granted for the past fiscal year, and the future years, the ability to participate in the
cost of living allowances and percentage increase approved by the ABC Board. Any percentage merit
increases granted will be subject to the ABC Board approval based on his performance evaluation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Compensation Survey and Financial Operating Analysis
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
A motion to approve with two changes was approved 3 -1, Commissioner Wolfe dissenting. The changes
include an effective date of October 1, 2014 and that the increases be subject to Board of County
Commissioners approval.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9
Extracted from NC Official Website October 8, 2014
§ 7A -101. Compensation.
(a) The clerk of superior court is a full -time employee of the State and shall receive an
annual salary, payable in equal monthly installments, based on the population of the county as
determined in subsection (al) of this section, according to the following schedule:
Population Annual Salary
Less than 100,000 $ 83,390
100,000 to 149,999 93,578
150,000 to 249,999 103,766
250,000 and above 113,958
When a county changes from one population group to another, the salary of the clerk shall be
changed, on July 1 of the fiscal year for which the change is reported, to the salary appropriate for
the new population group, except that the salary of an incumbent clerk shall not be decreased by
any change in population group during his continuance in office.
(al) For purposes of subsection (a) of this section, the population of a county for any fiscal
year shall be the population for the beginning of that fiscal year as reported by the Office of State
Budget and Management to the Administrative Office of the Courts prior to the beginning of that
fiscal year.
(b) The clerk shall receive no fees or commission by virtue of his office. The salary set
forth in this section is the clerk's sole official compensation, but if, on June 30, 1975, the salary of
a particular clerk, by reason of previous but no longer authorized merit increments, is higher than
that set forth in the table, that higher salary shall not be reduced during his continuance in office.
(c) In ii-I:« of merit and other increment raises paid to regular State employees, a clerk of
superior court shall receive as longevity pay an amount equal to four and eight- tenths percent
(4.8 %) of the clerk's annual salary payable monthly after five years of service, nine and six - tenths
percent (9.6 %) after 10 years of service, fourteen and four- tenths percent (14.4 %) after 15 years
of service, nineteen and two- tenths percent (19.2 %) after 20 years of se vice, and twenty -four
percent (24 %) after 25 years of service. Service shall mean service in the elective position of clerk
of superior court, as an assistant clerk of court and as a supervisor of clerks of superior court with
the Administrative Office of the Courts and shall not include service as a deputy or acting clerk.
Service shall also mean service as a justice, judge, or magistrate of the General Court of Justice or
as a district attorney. (1965, c. 310, s. 1; 1967, c. 691, s. 5; 1969, c. 1186, s. 3; 1971, c. 877, ss. 1,
2; 1973, c. 571, ss. 1, 2; 1975, c. 956, s. 7; 1975, 2nd Sess., c. 983, s. 11; 1977, c. 802, s. 42; 1977,
2nd Sess., c. 1136, s. 13; 1979, c. 838, s. 85; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1137, s. 12; 1981, c. 964, s. 14; c.
1127, s. 12; 1983, c. 761, ss. 200, 247, 249; 1983 (Reg. Sess., 1984), c. 1034, ss. 86, 87; c. 1109,
s. 13.1; 1985, c. 479, s. 211; c. 689, s. 3; c. 698, s. 10(c); 1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 1014, s. 34;
1987, c. 738, s. 20; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1086, s. 14; c. 1100, ss. 16(a), 17; 1989, c. 752, s.
31; c. 799, s. 27(a); 1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 900, s. 40; c. 1039, s. 21; 1993, c. 321, s. 57(a);
1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 769, s. 7.10(a); 1996, 2nd Ex. Sess., c. 18, s. 28.4; 1997 -443, s. 33.9;
1998 -153, s. 7; 1999 -237, s. 28.4; 2000 -67, s. 26.4; 2000 -140, s. 93.1(b); 2001 -424, ss. 12.2(b),
32.5; 2004 -124, s. 31.5(b); 2005 -276, ss. 29.5, 29.23B; 2006 -66, s. 22.5; 2007 -323, ss. 28.5,
28.18A(e); 2008 -107, s. 26.5; 2012 -142, s. 25.1A(e).)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 1
Chapter 5 - Recommendations Ciassfflwtfon and Compensatlan Stuff
for the Maw Honow County ABC Board, NC
RECOMMENDATION 2: Revise existing salary structure to reflect market conditions and best
practices, and transition employees Into the structure.
Fallowing proposed pay plan design discussions with the ABC Board's project team, it was
determined that the ABC Board's desire was to continue utilizing an open range structure
and to improve market competiveness and consistency. The Evergreen Solutions team then
developed a new market based pay plan. Grades were established that can be assigned to
multiple classifications. Progressive range spreads were utilized that provide consistency
and allow for proper salary progression through the grades.
Step 1. of the process was to develop a pay plan based on internal and external equity
analysis. The result of this is the proposed pay plan displayed in Exhibit 5C.
EXHIBIT 5C
PROPOSED PAY PLAN
101
$ 24,000.00 $ 30,000.00
$ 36,00D.00
102
$25,920.00 $ 32,400.00
$ 38,880.00
103
$27,993.60 $ 34,992.OD
$ 41,990.40
104
$30,233.09 $ 37,791.36
$ 45,349.63
105
$32,651.74 $ 42,447.26
$ 52,242.78
106
$35,26187 $ 45,843.04
$ 54422.20
107
$38,084.98 $ 49,510.48
$ 60,935.97
108
$41,131.78 $ 55,527.91
$ 69,924.03
109
$45,244.96 $ 61,080.70
$ 76,916.43
110
$ 49,769.46 $ 67,188.77
$ 84,608.08
111
$54,746.40 $ 73,907.64
$ 93,068.88
112
$62,410.90 $ 84,254.71
$100098,53
113
$71,148.42 $ 96,050.37
$120,952.32
114
$ 81,109.20 $109,497.43
$137,885.65
115
$ 92,464.49 $124.827.07
S157.189.64
;er�ere Sotuiiona, Lf.0 PaSe 5-5
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 2
Profit Percent to Sales - All ABC Boards
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
Board Name
Gross
Sales
Income
From
Operations
Profit
Percent
Sales
# of
Stores
Wake County
102,721,215
16,831,789
16.39%
24
�! Hanover County
36,254,842
5,471,332
15.09%
8
Moore County
9,668,081
1,332,739
13.78%
4
Mecklenburg County
119,698,582
16,224,506
13.55%
23
Boone
5,334,057
691,718
12.97%
1
Lincoln County
2,356,650
303,832
12.89%
1
Mooresville
8,544,323
1,089,943
12.76%
3
Southport
2,218,409
280,768
12.66%
1
Dare County
14,784,390
1,858,712
12.57%
5
Sylva'
2,358,569
282,959
12.00%
0
Clinton
1,796,475
210,526
11.72%
1
Granville County
3,387,170
394,696
11.65%
2
Morganton
2,801,860
314,232
11.22%
1
Pitt County
16,182,987
1,789,902
11.06%
9
Asheboro
2,999,287
326,412
10.88%
1
Clay County
1,867,767
201,506
10.79%
1
Greensboro
39,298,820
4,201,864
10.69%
15
High Point
14,972,472
1,588,946
10.61%
6
Elizabethtown
1,202,196
126,813
10.55%
1
Hoke County
1,233,050
129,991
10.54%
1
Craven County
8,563,010
897,624
10.48%
6
Carteret County
11,984,293
1,245,288
10.39%
6
Cramerton
1,702,940
176,383
10.36%
1
Cumberland County
29,583,475
3,060,796
10.35%
10
Pittsboro
1,111,896
114,040
10.26%
1
Durham County
28,735,744
2,891,664
10.06%
8
Johnston County
11,541,096
1,150,475
9.97%
8
Triad Municipal
36,923,775
3,648,410
9.88%
14
Monroe
3,824,424
374,224
9.79%
1
Lexington
3,685,262
352,549
9.57%
2
Person County
2,643,407
252,046
9.53%
2
Asheville
25,699,513
2,427,035
9.44%
9
Pasquotank County
3,089,832
291,353
9.43%
1
High Country
2,697,054
251,636
9.33%
1
Blowing Rock
1,421,688
131,069
9.22%
1
Shallotte
1,579,459
145,354
9.20%
1
Currituck County
4,714,264
433,417
9.19%
3
West Jefferson
1,480,696
134,671
9.10%
1
Onslow County
14,615,820
1,311,250
8.97%
6
Albemarle
2,509,388
224,522
8.95%
1
Indian Trail
2,902,487
256,555
8.84%
1
Mount Holly
1,808,753
158,333
8.75%
_1
Wallace
1,423,490
123,027
8.64%
Concord
11,318,382
972,845
8.60%
5
Wayne County
7,756,505
657,338
8.47%
5
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 3
Operating Cost Analysis - FY 2014
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 4
Profit
# Of
Gross
Operating
Cost
Average
Percent
Board Name
Stores
Profits
Expense1
Ratio
Daily Cost
To Sales
Wake County
24
25,826,312
8,432,471
0.33
27,467
16.39%
New Hanover County
8
9,425,512
3,606,779
0.38
11,748
15.09%
Mecklenburg County
23
30,475,387
13,034,418
0.43
42,457
13.55%
Moore County
4
2,418,656
1,038,177
0.43
3,382
13.78%
Lincoln County
1
570,650
251,422
0.44
819
12.89%
Mooresville
3
2,082,963
927,009
0.45
3,020
12.76%
Dare County
5
3,595,219
1,614,918
0.45
5,260
12.57%
Boone
1
1,329,219
616,518
0.46
2,008
12.97%
Southport
1
551,980
267,149
0.48
870
12.66%
Sylva'
0
589,404
289,889
0.49
944
12.00%
Granville County
2
818,554
407,721
0.50
1,328
11.65%
Clinton
1
440,923
225,416
0.51
734
11.72%
Carteret County
6
3,005,652
1,577,110
0.52
5,137
10.39%
Morganton
1
682,309
359,324
0.53
1,170
11.22%
Elizabethtown
1
290,257
153,200
0.53
499
10.55%
Pittsboro
1
273,756
145,348
0.53
473
10.26%
Pitt County
9
4,070,645
2,163,737
0.53
7,048
11.06%
Asheboro
1
749,816
401,301
0.54
1,307
10.88%
High Point
6
3,802,444
2,044,896
0.54
6,661
10.61%
Craven County
6
2,116,153
1,143,999
0.54
3,726
10.48%
Clay County
1
454,625
249,080
0.55
811
10.79%
Cumberland County
10
7,494,864
4,122,103
0.55
13,427
10.35%
Hoke County
1
300,237
165,335
0.55
539
10.54%
Greensboro
15
9,814,094
5,411,170
0.55
17,626
10.69%
Currituck County
3
1,169,305
645,506
0.55
2,103
9.19%
Johnston County
8
2,820,070
1,557,125
0.55
5,072
9.97%
Monroe
1
937,588
526,461
0.56
1,715
9.79%
Durham County
8
7,164,866
4,034,551
0.56
13,142
10.06%
Triad Municipal
14
9,121,322
5,144,006
0.56
16,756
9.88%
Asheville
9
6,461,464
3,692,513
0.57
12,028
9.44%
Albemarle
1
627,310
359,778
0.57
1,172
8.95%
Cramerton
1
426,321
245,418
0.58
799
10.36%
Pasquotank County
1
735,411
423,960
0.58
1,381
9.43%
West Jefferson
1
357,749
206,706
0.58
673
9.10%
Mount Holly
1
430,745
249,984
0.58
814
8.75%
Lexington
2
882,768
517,568
0.59
1,686
9.57%
High Country
1
668,085
392,092
0.59
1,277
9.33%
Person County
2
641,251
376,360
0.59
1,226
9.53%
Onslow County
6
3,655,830
2,148,027
0.59
6,997
8.97%
Blowing Rock
1
368,869
217,042
0.59
707
9.22%
Weaverville
1
556,190
327,780
0.59
1,068
6.79%
Shallotte
1
383,884
232,516
0.61
757
9.20%
Lenoir City
2
707,444
434,355
0.61
1,415
8.04%
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 4
New Hanover County ABC Board
Distributions of Taxes, Profits & Alcohol Law Enforcement Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2014
% of Total
Entity
1452487
Below
State of North Carolina Agencies:
294,519 1.90
Excise tax - Dept of Revenue
Town of Kure Beach
$ 7,620,982
Sales tax - Liquor - Dept of Revenue
8
1,795,506
Profit distribution
Sales tax (Wine & Mixers) - Dept of Revenue
11,756
' se!ty'..P.
3,049
4,546,511 94%
29
Mixed beverage surcharge - Dept of Revenue
963,166
Mixed beverage surcharge - Dept of Human Resources
96,317
Bailment surcharge - ABC Commission
161,931
Total Paid to State Agencies
$ 10,640,951
70.06%
Local Government Beneficiaries:
New Hanover County
Rehabilitation Tax
103,301
Tax Distributions
918,476
Alcohol law enforcement
505,001
Profit distribution
984,587
2,511,365
16.5 3 P `,
City of Wilmington
Tax Distributions
593,487
Profit distribution
659,274
1,252,761
Town of Wrightsville Beach
Tax Distributions
193,673
Profit distribution
282,737
476,410
3 -14%
Town of Carolina Beach
Tax Distributions
1452487
Profit distribution
149,032
294,519 1.90
Town of Kure Beach
Tax Distributions
8
,;.
Profit distribution
3142
' 614
11,756
' se!ty'..P.
Total Paid to Local Government Beneficiaries
4,546,511 94%
29
Total Paid to State & Local Governments
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 9 - 1 - 5
$ 15,1$7,762 100.00%
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
REGULAR
DEPARTMENT: Budget PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager and Benjamin
David, District Attorney
CONTACT(S): Cam Griffin, Budget Director
f 101.111 Drill 9
Consideration of Contribution of Funds to City of Wilmington to Fund Forensic Chemist for Forensic
Crime Lab
BRIEF SUMMARY:
City, County and Court staff met to determine ways to reduce crime and the jail population. District Attorney
Benjamin David has asked the County to fund a full-time Forensic Chemist for the City of Wilmington
Forensic Lab. The addition of the Chemist will lead to serious drug offenders being sentenced in a more
timely manner, making our community a safer place for our citizens. Secondly, the Chemist may reduce the
amount of time serious offenders are housed in the detention center awaiting trial, which will reduce
detention center population and costs.
The interlocal agreement will run from January 1, 2015 until June 30, 2018. At that time, the effectiveness of
the additional position will be evaluated. The annual cost of the position is $83,459. Funds have been
identified in the existing FY14 -15 budget for the contribution, and the FYI 5-16 budget will include funding
for the continuation of the position.
0 Ntial 0 or" rf»IEVIL110 Wild I OWN 9
Superior Public Health, Safety and Education
• Increase public safety and crime prevention
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the interlocal agreement between New Hanover County and the City of Wilmington, for the City to
fund a Forensic Chemist for the City of Wilmington Forensic Lab.
ATTACHMENTS:
Interlocal Agreenment
Proposal Letter
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval of the ILA which funds the Forensic Chemist for the City.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10
t '
NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT #15 -0215
NORTH CAROLINA
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT entered into this day of , 2014
by and between NEW HANOVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North
Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "County ", and the CITY OF WILMINGTON, a
municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina and County of New Hanover,
hereinafter referred to as "City ";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the availability of a full time chemist for the Wilmington Police
Department will facilitate prioritizing narcotics testing for drug cases; and
WHEREAS, said expedited testing shall promote more effective law enforcement
investigations and District Attorney prosecution, resulting in more timely trial of
dangerous perpetrators of drug offenses; and
WHEREAS, New Hanover County is agreeable to funding said chemist position.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits set forth above, the
parties agree as follows:
dm
1. Position Funded. County shall provide funding for the employment of a
forensic chemist at the City of Wilmington Police Department Forensic Lab.
The annual personnel cost inclusive of benefits is $75,574. Together with
associated supplies and training, County agrees to provide the annual cost
not to exceed $83,459. Employment shall commence mid - fiscal year with the
cost for the 2014 -2015 Fiscal Year being $41,729. The Forensic Chemist
shall be an employee of City only and shall not be entitled to any County
salary or benefits.
2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall run from January 1, 2015 through
June 30, 2018.
3. Immunity Not Waived. This Agreement is government in nature and for the
benefit of the public and is not intended to be for private profit or gain, and
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10-1 -1
Page 1 of 3
NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT # 15 -0215
County and City do not intend to waive their sovereign immunity by reason of
this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this lease in duplicate as of
the day and year first above written.
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Clerk to the Board
This instrument has been
Pre - audited in the manner
Required by the Local
Government Budget and
Fiscal Control Act.
County Finance Director
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
City Clerk
dm
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Woody White, Chairman
Board of Commissioners
Approved as to Form
County Attorney
CITY OF WILMINGTON
in
Bill Saffo, Mayor
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10- 1 - 2
Page 2 of 3
This instrument has been
Pre - audited in the manner
Required by the Local
Government Budget and
Fiscal Control Act.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONTRACT #15 -0215
Approved as to Form
City Finance Officer City Attorney
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, 1 , a Notary Public of the State and
County aforesaid, certify that Teresa P. Elmore personally came before me this day and
acknowledged that she is Interim Clerk to the District Board of Commissioners of New
Hanover County, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the District, the
foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Chairman, sealed with its corporate
seal and attested by herself as its Clerk.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of , 2014.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public of the State
and County aforesaid, certify that Penelope Spicer - Sidbury acknowledged that she is
Clerk to the Board of the City of Wilmington, and that by authority duly given and as the
act of the City, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Manager, sealed
with its corporate seal and attested by herself as its Clerk.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this
My commission expires:
dm
Notary Public
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10- 1 - 3
day of , 2014.
Page 3 of 3
w414
4�►�• 1�2o1s'•
CIiY OF 1
aIRN NA
November 3, 2014
Mr. Chris Coudriet, County Manager
New Hanover County Government
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 195
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Proposal to Fund Forensic Chemist Position
Dear Mr. Coudriet:
Wilmington Police Department
Office of the Chief of Police
All a-Mi* . Ralph M. Evangelous
Ws 615 Bess Street
PO Box 1810
Wilmington, NC 28402 -1810
910 343 -3610
910 343 -3636 fax
www.wilmingtonnc.gov
Dial 711 TTY /Voice
I am writing to you to present a proposal that would enhance the public safety of
our County, inclusive of it municipalities. As I am sure you are aware, the
Wilmington Police Department has a Forensic Lab that staffs one full -time
Chemist, one part-time Chemist, and one part-time Forensic Technologist. The
Police Department's Forensic Lab has been operational since 2009. We have the
ability to complete blood alcohol tests (BAC) with a two week turn around, which
assists with expediting DWI criminal trials. Conducting such trials in a timely
manner has the effect of removing dangerous drivers off our streets and highways.
Further, the Police Department's Forensic Lab conducts BAC testing for external
stakeholders. The New Hanover County Sheriff's Office and the North Carolina
Highway Patrol are two of our largest external stakeholders.
The Department's lab is also capable of testing illegal and legal narcotics. Some
of the narcotics we are able to test include Heroin, Cocaine, Marihuana, and
prescription pills such as synthetic opioids and methamphetamines. Currently, our
chemists conduct narcotics testing on a case -by -case basis.
Benjamin David, our District Attorney has expressed the desire to expedite high
priority drug cases and offenders. Many of these cases include trafficking
offenses. Furthermore, many offenders are in the County jail awaiting trial; many
are out on bond. The Police Department's lab is not staffed to prioritize narcotics
testing and therefore unable to take the time to prioritize pending drug cases for
the entire County. For these reasons I am proposing that New Hanover County
identify and locate funds to provide for a full -time Forensic Chemist to be
employed by the Police Department's lab. This particular position would test and
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10- 2 - 1
complete all high priority drug cases awaiting trial for cases derived throughout
all of New Hanover County.
The benefits derived from having a full -time Forensic Chemist to prioritize drug
testing would most certainly provide similar results experienced with the
Department's BAC testing. The Department's Forensic Lab can provide drug
testing results in less than 60 days. The current turnaround time with the State's
lab is approximately one year. Criminal trials can be conducted in a timelier
manner, which will result in the incarceration of dangerous offenders.
Additionally, offenders being sentenced to the State's prison system or the
Federal prison system would shift the costs of housing those offenders awaiting
trial away from the local tax payer.
The cost of funding a Forensic Chemist for one year, inclusive of benefits is
$75,574. With supplies and necessary training the total cost to fund for this
position for one year is $83,459. The City is willing to start mid fiscal year and
would prorate associated costs for funding a Forensic Chemist. At 1/2 year the cost
would be approximately $41,729.
This proposal provides a win -win situation where serious drug offenders are
sentenced in a timelier manner, making our community a safer place for our
citizens. Second, there is an opportunity to free up jail space at our County
facility, which may reduce the cost of housing serious offenders while awaiting
trial.
If you would like to discuss this proposal further, please feel free to contact me. I
may be reached at 910.343.3610. 1 look forward to your correspondence.
Sincerely,
Ralph M. Evo us,
p g
Chief of Police
Wilmington Police Department
Rme /jv /sk
2
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 10- 2 - 2
a)
to
CU
a
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
REGULAR
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ben Andrea, Current Planning and Zoning
Supervisor (Planning Board Rep: Donna Girardot)
CONTACT(S): Ben Andrea; and Chris O'Keefe, Planning /Inspections Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S -622, 11/14) - Request by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on Behalf of UNCW
Endowment Fund to Develop a 195 -Foot Tall Telecommunications Tower in the CREST Research
Park on Marvin K. Moss Lane
BRIEF SUMMARY:
At their November 6, 2014 meeting, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the Special Use
Permit request. No one from the public spoke in support or in opposition of the request.
The property is currently zoned R -15, Residential District, and classified as Watershed Resource Protection
Area according to the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Attract and retain new and expanding businesses
• Build and maintain infrastructure
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Note: A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action requiring an evidentiary hearing and findings of fact.
ACTION NEEDED (Choose one):
1. Motion for Approval (with or without conditions); or
2. Motion to table the item in order to receive additional information or documentation (Specify); or
3. Motion for Denial based on specific findings in any of the 4 categories, such as lack of consistency
with adopted plans or determination that the project will pose public hazards or will not adequately
meet requirements of the ordinance.
Staff suggests the following motion:
Motion to Approve the Special Use Permit as requested and presented.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11
ATTACHMENTS:
S -622 Script
S -622 Petition Summary
S -622 Staff Summary
S -622 Neighbor Properties Map
S -622 Zoning -Ortho Map
S -622 CAMA Map
S -622 Water -Sewer Map
Applicant Materials Cover
S -622 Application
Proposed Site Plan Cover
S -622 Site Plan Set -Ltr
S -622 Colocation Certification
S -622 Photo Simulations
S -622 Real Estate Impact Report
S -622 Authority For Appointment of Agent
S -622 FAA Compliance Report
S -622 FCC Compliance Report
S -622 Justification Report
S -622 Fall Zone Letter
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Approve as presented by staff.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11
ITEM# 1
SCRIPT FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT S -622, 11/14
Request by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on behalf of UNCW Endowment Fund to develop a 195 Ft. tall
telecommunications tower in the CREST research Park on Marvin K. Moss Lane. The property
is currently zoned R -15, Residential District, and classified as Watershed Resource Protection
Area according to the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan.
SWEAR IN WITNESS
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents
will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal.
2. Open the Public Hearing:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant' s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the Public Hearing.
4. A Special Use Permit which is denied may only be resubmitted at the discretion of the Planning Director.
You may ask to continue the matter. Do you wish to do so?
5. Commissioners Discussion
6. Ask Applicant whether he /she agrees with staff findings and any proposed conditions.
7. Vote on the special use permit.
Motion to table item to obtain additional information.
Id Motion to grant the permit - All findings are positive.
Motion to grant, subject to conditions specified below:
(State Conditions)
13 Motion to deny because, if completed as proposed, the development more probably than
not:
® a. Will endanger the public health or safety for the following reasons:
® b. Cannot meet all required conditions and specifications, in particular:
c. Will substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property in the following way:
d. Will not be in harmony with the area in which it is located for the following
reasons:
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11-1 -1
Case S -622, (11/14)
Special Use Permit Request to develop a telecommuncations tower in an R -15 Zoning District
Petition Summary Data
Parcel Location & Acreage: 5500 block of Marvin K. Moss Lane, 52.83 acres
Owner /Petitioner: UNCW Endowment Fund Board of Trustees & State of NC/
Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Existing Land Use: Institutional — UNCW Center for Marine Science
Zoning History: "Masonboro" (October 15, 1969)
Land Classification: Watershed Resource Protection
Water Type: N/A
Sewer Type: N/A
Access: Access for repair /maintenance provided via access easement from
Marvin K. Moss Lane
Fire District:
New Hanover County South
Watershed & Water Quality
Classification:
Drains Directly to ICWW (SA;ORW)
Conservation /Historic/
Archaeological Resources:
None known in subject area
Soils and Septic Suitability:
Torhunta Loamy Fine Sand (Be) — Severe: Wetness /Flooding
Flood Hazard Areas:
None
Schools:
Bellamy Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, Ashley High
5 -622, 11/14 Page 1 of 1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 2 - 1
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
S -622, 11/14: Request for a Special Use Permit to develop a telecommunications tower on a
portion of a 52.83 acre site located in an R -15 Residential District.
Request By: Nexsen Pruet, PLLC, on behalf of the UNCW Endowment Fund Board of
Trustees and the State of North Carolina (Property Owner)
Location: 5500 block of Marvin K. Moss Lane
PIDs: R07600- 003 - 003 -000, R7600- 003 - 017 -000
Planning Board Action
At their November 6, 2014 meeting, the Planning Board unanimously (6 -0) passed a motion to
recommend approval of the Special Use Permit request with no conditions.
Summary of Request
American Towers, LLC, applicant, is requesting a Special Use Permit to construct and operate a
195' monopole telecommunications tower facility on a 70' x 136' leased area on a 52.83 acre
site located at 5500 block of Marvin K. Moss Lane.
The property currently hosts the UNCW Center for Marine Science /CREST Research Park that
was originally approved by Special Use Permit in 1991 and subsequently modified in 2000,
2003, 2007, and 2010. The development on site encompasses the development approved with
the original SUP approval and modifications.
A 70' x 136' leased area is proposed, which will encompass the tower, equipment pads, and
required 25' buffer and fence. The tower area is situated adjacent to the stormwater
management pond and an existing parking area, in the central area of the CREST Research Park
site.
The parcels immediately surrounding the site remain largely undeveloped, and the existing land
uses in the area primarily consist of single family residential uses along Myrtle Grove Road.
Preliminary Staff Findings of Fact
(In Accordance with Section 71 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance)
Finding 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or
safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved.
A. Water and sewer infrastructure and capacity are available to serve the site, but not
necessary for the proposed use.
S -622, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 3 - 1
Pagel of 4
B. The subject property is located in the New Hanover County South Fire Service District.
C. Access to the tower site will be provided by a 12' wide access easement /drive from
Marvin K. Moss Lane.
D. The subject site does not host any known cultural or archaeological resources.
Staff Suggestion: Evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use will not
materially endanger the public health or safety where proposed.
Finding 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications
of the Zoning Ordinance.
A. Telecommunication Communication Facilities, Cellular, and Related Towers are allowed
by Special Use Permit in the R -15 zoning district provided that the project meets the
Standards of Section 63.5 -1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
B. Section 63.5 -1(A) requires that the setback from any existing residential property line or
residential zoning district boundary for any tower, antenna, or related structure in any
zoning district be a distance equal to the height of the tower as measured from the base
of the tower. The location of the proposed 195' tall tower is at least 245 feet from all
adjacent property lines as well as any existing residential uses, exceeding the setback
requirement of Section 63.5 -1(A).
C. Section 63.5 -1(B)1 requires that the minimum distance between the tower and any
other adjoining parcel of land or road must be equal to the minimum setback described
in Section 63.5 -1(A), plus any additional distance necessary to ensure that the tower, as
designed, will fall within the tower site. The proposed location complies with this
provision, and no evidence has been submitted suggesting that additional distance is
necessary.
D. Section 63.5 -1(B)2 requires the applicant to submit photographs and statements as to
the potential visual and aesthetic impacts on all adjacent residential zoning districts. A
report sufficing this requirement was submitted as part of the application.
E. Section 63.5 -1(C) requires a landscaped buffer with a base width not less than 25 feet
and providing 100% opacity, in addition to a minimum 8 ft. tall fence surrounding the
tower base. The proposed plans suffice this requirement.
F. Section 63.5 -1(D) requires that applicants seeking construction of new towers,
antennas, and related structures demonstrate through submitted written evidence that
collocation on any existing tower, antenna, or usable structure in the search area for the
new tower is not reasonable or possible. A report (RF Justification for AT &T Wireless
Site 478 -112) has been submitted with the application, meeting this requirement.
G. Section 63.5 -1(E) requires that towers 150' tall or less be engineered to accommodate a
minimum of one additional provider. Evidence has been submitted demonstrating that
this requirement has been met, and a Collocation Certification was also submitted by
the applicant.
H. Section 63.5 -1(F) requires certification that the construction or placement of the
proposed facility complies with several federal regulations. An FCC Compliance
S -622, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 3 - 2
Page 2 of 4
Assessment has been submitted and demonstrates compliance with the federal
regulations mentioned in Section 63.5 -1(F).
I. Section 63.5 -1(1) regulates the signage allowed on the tower and related equipment.
The signage proposed is compliant with this ordinance provision.
J. Section 63.5 -1(J) prohibits the storage of equipment, hazardous waste, or materials not
needed for the operation, prohibits outdoor storage yards in a tower equipment
compound, and prohibits habitable space within the compound area. The applicant's
proposal complies with this ordinance section.
K. Section 63.5 -1(L) requires that, when the proposed tower site is within 10,000 feet of an
airport or within any runway approach zone, the applicant submit Form 7460 to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to assure compliance with all FAA standards. An
FAA Aeronautical Evaluation was included with the application and indicates that the
site is approximately 46,141 feet from the Wilmington International Airport and will
comply with FAA regulations.
Staff Suggestion: Evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use meets all of
the required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance.
Finding 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining
or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity.
A. The location of the proposed tower is in an area of the UNCW CMS /CREST Research Park
that does not conflict with the other existing or planned uses of the facility. The site is
significantly buffered from adjacent properties and existing residential uses.
B. A 25' wide buffer surrounding the tower base will provide visual screening for future
development.
C. No evidence has been submitted that this project will decrease the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
Staff Suggestion: The evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use will not
substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property.
Finding 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed
according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it
is to be located and in general conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover
County.
A. The 2006 Wilmington -New Hanover County CAMA Land Use Plan classifies the area
proposed for the tower site as Watershed Resource Protection, and the proposal is not
in conflict with the intent of the Transition land use classification, and additionally, not
in conflict with any other policy of the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan.
Staff Suggestion: Evidence in the record at this time supports a finding that the use is general
conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover County.
S -622, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 3 - 3
Page 3 of 4
SUMMARY
Staff concludes that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposal complies with Section
63.5 -1 of the Zoning Ordinance Zoning Ordinance as well as the findings of fact specified in
Section 71 of the Ordinance. Staff also concludes that, with the information submitted, the
applicant has demonstrated that the proposal is not in conflict with the management strategy
for the Watershed Resource Protection land use classification, and not in conflict with any other
policies of the CAMA Land Use Plan.
Note: A Special Use Permit is a quasi - judicial action requiring an evidentiary hearing and
findings of fact.
ACTION NEEDED (Choose one):
1. Motion for Approval (with or without conditions)
2. Motion to table the item in order to receive additional information or documentation
(Specify).
3. Motion for Denial based on specific findings in any of the 4 categories above, such as
lack of consistency with adopted plans or determination that the project will pose
public hazards or will not adequately meet requirements of the ordinance.
Staff suggests the following motion:
Motion to Approve the Special Use Permit as requested and presented.
S -622, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 3 - 4
Page 4 of 4
\
\*
$§
f !!
\ 4 0 0 0 0 /±
\j
/
q � ƒ
�
ƒ o �
!
N
, .
§E
;kk1
) \/ ±
N /
� » a
42 / �
°� �
} ° )
- & »
«\ LL
ca R
we to
v / M
$ (L
+ / ƒ
o /
�§ $\
,m 32 /
w �
�
§ �
�m
\ g 09
_ §� {o�
`� M §
a\ }\§® /
« E \
0 *e
e ■ LO / f
�
6
m�
., tMA
Board a Commissioners - _e_tm,
ITEM 11-4-1
\ \
\ §
\ \
\ \ \
\ \ \
\ \ \
\//
§ \
�\ o
\\ H v
w
rc rc rc rc rc rc rc y v a v, 0
OI pO °yd
N w
�j I�0010010� IE 0
�s
L � /
o
ui O
o
g 0 r
o
� --
N N a
tm o
-Z 81
i
/
v W �
o y°
R m
ca
3
i LLL555
p
\ Q�
fV
y fn F, d A yy OQ
04 T m
R /
co �
J N OHbp��
/ ��� �o� �Z v O O
co
R€ Y Qo / / \OSb�� \ \h�`Q. OHO'.
o a. J �
E H i7 oo / k-
/ T\
10
2
TOJ r�
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 5 - 1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 6 - 1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11-7-1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 8 - 1
Print Form
NEW HANOVER COUNTY 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS Wilmington, NC 28403
910- 798 -7165 phone
910 -798 -7053 fax
Application for www.nhcgov.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Petitioner Information
Property Owner(s)
Subject Property
If different than Petitioner
Name
Owner Name
Address
Thomas H. Johnson, Jr., Esq.
I UNCW Endowment Fund
5598 Marvin K. Moss Lane
Company
Owner Name 2
Parcel ID(s)
Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
R07600 -003 -017 -000
Address
Address
Area
4141 Parklake Ave., Suite 200
601 South College Road
2,620 sq. ft.
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Existing Zoning and Use
Raleigh, NC 27612
Wilmington, NC 28403 -5918
R- 15Nacani land adjacent to UNCW
stormwater facility
Phone
Phone
Proposed Use
919.653.7807
910.962.2074 (Steve Pickard)
Telecommunications facility
Email
Email
Land Classification
tjohnson@nexsenpruet.com
pickards @UNCW.edu
Application Tracking Information
(S1q1J'0n 1y)
Case Nurmberr�
Date /Time received:
by:
[Received
S--
<C7 Mm ti ku io
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
In order to assist petitioners through the process for obtaining a Special Use Permit, petitioners are highly
encouraged to attend a pre - application conference prior to application submittal. Petitioners are requested
to review the sections of the Zoning Ordinance specific to Special Use Permits prior to submission, and
advised to contact Planning Staff with any questions. The following sections of the Zoning Ordinance
pertain specifically to Special Use Permits:
• Section 70: Objectives and Purposes of Special Use Permits
• Section 71: General Requirements of Special Use Permits
• Section 72: Additional Restrictions Imposed on Certain Special Uses
• Section 111: Petitions
Applications for Special Use Permits (with the exception of single family dwellings on individual lots)
must first be considered by the New Hanover County Planning Board at a public hearing. The Planning
Board will make a recommendation to the County Commissioners which will take final action on the
permit application in a quasi - judicial public hearing. Attendance at all public hearings is required. The
public hearings will allow staff, the applicant, proponents and opponents to testify in regards to the
request. Unless otherwise published or announced, Planning Board meetings are held on the first
Thursday of each month at 6:OOPM in the Commissioner's Assembly Room at the Historic County
Courthouse located at Third and Princess Streets, Wilmington, North Carolina. All meeting dates and
application deadlines are published on the New Hanover County Planning website.
Page 1 of 4
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 04/14
ITEM: 11- 9 - 1
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
In order to assist petitioners through the process for obtaining a Special Use Permit, petitioners are highly
encouraged to attend a pre - application conference prior to application submittal. Applications must be
reviewed by Planning Staff for completeness prior to being officially accepted. Applications must be
submitted to Planning Staff at least twenty (20) working days before the Planning Board meeting at which
the application is to be considered. Once accepted, the Planning Board will consider the application at the
assigned meeting unless the applicant requests a continuance.
Applications for single - family dwellings, including mobile homes, on individual lots do not require
Planning Board review and must be submitted to Planning Staff twenty (20) working days before the
Commissioners meeting. For High Density Residential projects, a High Density Residential application
and High Density Checklist must also accompany this application. The New Hanover County Technical
Review Committee (TRC) must also review a High Density Residential project prior to submitting this
application.
For all proposals, in addition to this application, the following supplemental information and materials are
required:
.............. ...
Required Information
Applicant
Staff
Initial
Initial
Narrative of Proposed Use
_
Traffic Impact Worksheet
—
Traffic Impact Analysis if applicable)
A
—141A
Site Plan (8 -24x36 copies for Planning Board; 8 -24x36 copies for Commissioners)
_!+.
• Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
• Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential
uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be
occupied by each structure and/or subdivided boundaries. For non-
residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of
each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose
for which it will be used.
• Development schedule including proposed phasing.
• Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local
traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to
and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets and
location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas.
• All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks,
rights -of -way, buffering and signage
• The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable
• Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of
the Zoning Ordinance
• Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding
General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be
regulated by State law or Local Ordinance.
• Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change
Ref. Article VII, as applicable)
Authority for Appointment of Agent Form (if applicable)
'fit
Fee - $500; $250 if application pertains to a residential use (i.e. mobile home,
duplex family child care home
Page 2 of 4
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 04114
ITEM: 11- 9 - 2
CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A_ SPECIAL USE PERMIT
(As Outlined in Section 71 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance)
The applicant should explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed use
satisfies these requirements (please use additional pages if necessary). The applicant has the burden of proof
and must provide sufficient evidence in order for the required findings to be met. Planning Staff, the Planning
Board, and the Board of County Commissioners reserve the right to require additional information, if needed, to
assure that the proposed Special Use Permit meets the following requirements:
1. The Board must find "that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where
proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved."
I See Exhibit A attached hereto.
2. The Board must find "that the use meets all required conditions and specifications" of the Zoning
Ordinance.
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
3. The Board must find "that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property or
that the use is a ElLblic necessity."
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
1. The Board must find "that the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general
confonn-ity with the Wan of develoj2ment for New Hanover County."
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
Page 3 of 4
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 04114
ITEM: 11- 9 - 3
Section 72 of the Zoning Ordinance provides additional requirements for the following Special Use Permits.
Please supplement your application with all necessary material to meet any additional requirements if your use
is any of the following:
• Cemetery
• Convenience Food Store
• Hospital or Nursing and Personal Care Facilities
• Private Club or Lodge and Fraternal and Social
Organizations
• Sanitary Landfill
• Travel Trailer Park
• Family Child Care Home
• Kennel
• Mobile Home
• Non - Residential Off -Street Parking
• Commercial Marina
• Septage and Sludge Disposal
• Outdoor Shooting Ranges
• Adult Entertainment Establishment
• Indoor /Outdoor Recreation Establishments
• Community Boating Facility
• Residential Uses within Commercial Districts
• Bed and Breakfast Inn
• Electronic Gaming Operation
• Farmers Market or Produce Stands in
Residential Zoning Districts
• Mining
• High Density Development
• Senior Living Options
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County
Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next
meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper,
the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the
continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as
published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required.
In granting a Special Use Permit, conditions may be designated to assure that the use in its proposed
location is harmonious with the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance, LAMA Land Use Plan and any other
adopted plans that are applicable. All conditions become part of the special use permit and run with
the land. A Special Use Permit shall become null and void if construction or occupancy of the
proposed use as specified and approved is not commenced within 24 months of the date of issuance.
By my signature below, I certify that this application is complete and that all of the information
presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Thomas H. Johnson, Jr., Esq., as Agent for UNCW
Endowment Fund
Signature of Petitioner and /or Property Owner
Page 4 of 4
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 9 - 4
Print Name
04114
EXHIBIT A
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
American Towers LLC, Site Name Mohican
5598 Marvin K. Moss Lane, 'Wilmington, NC
(1) General Requirement #1 -- that the use will not materially endanger the public
health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the Alan as
submitted and approved:
The proposed use will not materially endanger the public health or safety, if located and
developed according to the plan submitted. The proposed use will have virtually no impact on
traffic conditions in the vicinity or on the provision of services and utilities. It will not require
water, sewer, or garbage collection services. The proposed facility will have virtually no impact
on soil erosion or sedimentation and meets or exceeds all setback requirements. The proposed
tower will fully comply with all FCC rules and standards regarding maximum permissible
exposure to radio frequency emissions and public safety. The proposed use will be constructed
to meet or exceed all ANSI and FAA requirements. Finally, the proposed use will have virtually
no adverse impact on the protection of public, community, or private water supplies, including
possible adverse effects on surface waters or groundwater. Thus, the proposed development will
maintain the public health and safety of the community and will not materially endanger the
public safety.
To the contrary, the proposed use will enhance public safety. Wireless
telecommunications services provide an alternative method of communication, which has proven
crucial in times where the traditional, land -line communications systems are either inaccessible
(e.g., when one's car breaks down while traveling or when boating) or are downed by extreme
winds and weather. Towers of the type proposed here have consistently provided the only means
of communication with family and emergency personnel in times of flood, high winds and other
extreme weather conditions. Wireless towers, similar to the one proposed here, have withstood
hurricane -force winds consistently without failing. Also, many households have either dropped
their land -line phones and have become wireless only or even if they have a land -line phone,
they prefer using their wireless device primarily for communication. In fact, most calls to 911
are now from wireless devices. In this case, the proposed tower will additionally provide service
to the waterways to the east. Finally, all of the regulations and requirements applicable to the
proposed use have been met and exceeded to ensure that the proposed use will have no adverse
effect whatsoever on the public health or safety.
(2) General Requirement #2 — that the use meets all required conditions and
specifications of the Zoning Ordinance,
The proposed use of the property is for an unmanned radio telecommunications facility
consisting of a 199 foot monopole in a 20' X 86' lease area. The proposed use is in compliance
NPRAL 1:445218.1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 8/25/14 02:26 PM
ITEM: 11- 9 - 5
with the purpose and intent of the plan of development of New Hanover County, North Carolina
Land Use Zoning Ordinance and is a compatible use in the areas where it is located.
The development of an unmanned radio telecommunications facility on the Site will be
consistent with New Hanover County's goals to maintain the county's character and
environmental well - being.
The property is zoned R -15 under the Zoning Ordinance, and wireless communications
facilities are allowed in the R -15 district with a Special Use Permit. The Site meets all
Ordinance technical requirements for unmanned radio telecommunications facility and is
consistent with the Land Use Plan. The proposed facility will not emit any significant noise or
glare and will not be lighted. The proposed facility will be in compliance with the general plan
for the physical development of New Hanover County as embodied in the Ordinance.
(3) General Requirement 0 — that the use will not substantially iniure the value of
adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity_.
American Towers LLC is sensitive to the placement of towers and selected this Site in an
effort to minimize the visual impact on the surrounding area. The proposed tower will be a 199'
monopole tower, and will be well hidden because of existing trees. The tower compound and
ground equipment will be screened with landscaping as required by the County's ordinance.
The development of an unmanned radio telecommunications facility on the Site will enhance
wireless telecommunications service in this area of New Hanover County for the benefit of
UNCW, local residents and businesses. UNCW is in great need of better wireless coverage at
this location and American Tower, who will build this tower, already has interest from AT &T,
Verizon and T- Mobile to locate on this site, which will greatly enhance mobile coverage in this
area. Numerous studies, including an Impact Study prepared specifically in connection with this
Application, have demonstrated that similar towers do not substantially injure the value of
neighboring or nearby land. For all these reasons, American Towers LLC submits that the
proposed tower will maintain or enhance the value of adjoining property.
(4) General Requirement #4 — that the location and character of the use if developed
according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which
it is to be located and in general conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover
County.
The location and character of the proposed use will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of the area in which it is located. The proposed facility will not
emit any substantial noise or glare. Because the proposed use is listed as a permitted special use
in the zoning district in which the parcel at issue is located, there has been a legislative
determination that the proposed use is in harmony with other permitted uses in the area.
Furthermore, the proposed facility will be visually buffered as required by the Ordinance. In
addition to the required landscape buffer, the proposed lease area and facility is surrounded by
NPRAL1:445218.1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 8125/1402:26 PM
ITEM: 11- 9 - 6
existing mature trees. As evidenced by the enclosed photo simulation, the proposed facility is
only visible when looking east by northeast towards the site, and even then the visibility is
minimal. Moreover, the proposed unmanned radio telecommunications facility will be in
compliance with the general plan for the physical development of New Hanover County as
embodied in the Ordinance and is consistent with other existing sites within the County's
jurisdiction. Therefore, the proposed development will be in harmony with the area in which it is
located.
NPI2ALL445218.1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 812511402:26 PM
ITEM: 11- 9 - 7
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 10 - 1
c -esn (aye) a
s`s�s.a oN ,avouw
001 sins
Nouva d 0 N3N3a oosc
3rMOJ. Nvi w!
Csu-O#3sN331 0.N
OSES-68S fA68)';Nd
15ES19B (618 301jj0
costa ON'HDI31n
avow NOAaisae
(wNnooa.noNae M3Ns
sons aNNO.aN mvn
3Ndi ssow N NNavw urss
ON NVOIHOW
880SLZ :# Oltl
k `" °N "'
mss. "+
f Y
-
-�9p
sss :R a3.
:NOisN3a �n3ewn
S1tlN01SSidOHd ON183NION383MI
Z66'8L4 # 1'81tl
�g
133 HS 31111
�aoi a3avd3ad sNV�d
:.e —V — sN—
a
Z
-
- -
S
om
3
_ 3 R
r�-
- -_
pon
rc3
LU
Z
Z
ry�m rym rymuo ryi3a rya.
3
u °
-- io
z.
_ - _ - __ - _ _
u a a a
rya
-3a°
F
833z'
Z
-
Z
�<
3
-
_
u °
-_- - -_ - oo�
lJJ
Z
am ryo�ia�, .. e NLL� am am3>aa.a �s mamma aos mua a3
LLI
^_soa `a_.. `� `m�� `LLLL `aa
K
p
I�
3 0
�Z ga
a�
w
�a
tnN7
`O� roU
r� NnVO rr
�z� �N�
w -
is
a
o -
Qa >C7 °z ��a
VR wza Fez
°o
-
- -
z
<<-
�0 �_� aQP
_ --
LL]
p�
o00
I I I U ILI
Z
m _
z3
z
3
°
`�
dl
M m
F
a
-
Q
_
�a
w
w w
=z
- z-
a
a
--=
o0z
;
30 _H
O
ry w rc rc
Q
-
°p c'i 0 6o w
m
x
U,
- zn w
y
w
06 u0 U n p
=
y
z. z.
- - -
Z
O
ry m m
°ai °ai
y
am
Z
O
p
W
yr m >z
F
Q
a 2
n
F
Q
Z
W_ prv�
y>�Z
C
mi mi
Y Y
C C
m mm
OwLL �
z
_
o >= om
O
a
ry N
d'
000 <Z,
O
LL
��� ��� _ _ _ o
LL
O
o r 2
Z
o u z: z 9 p°rwm„ p°rwrce w p°rwp„ z3133
Z
3 3 a
u n a b
a ap�_ p�_ oe�oP oe�mm z o „� °m w 3zFZZ
oUdE .. LLm �3»
F
w
_ r'�wsm i raw
- ¢¢- - - w - p=-
Q
G j j
G
W
o
w
W
'
.. z ¢ C
'p i O0
r r 2
L, r z
U L
w w
2
w w
Z
a
v
Board of Uommissioners - Uecember 1, 2U14
ITEM: 11- 11 - 1
c -esr (6 �6) :3 0611'ap 35N3af1'a'N k `" °�" sss :R
sus niiia (uNnon I—VI 3N) 8 s0
001 3iinse Asa NN +aVN 09E9 99 0 � XVO sorsa .N NO3awmim �',p
Nol1Va 1— 3o 3a oosc l9ESlA8 (filO�d'JIj00 3NVi ssow H NNavw wss �° - NOisN3a a3ewnN 133
a3moi NvlIW-gW E09LZ NN N913�va ON NtlOIHOW
V n3add3ad 3NV avoa NO.ml szE a n a 88-9LZ :# Oltl n NOIltlA3l3 N3MOlas
51tlN01S53i0Ad 7NI833NI9N3 tl3MU1 ZL6'8L4 :# 1'81tl � � � '81f10Atll 3115
ni _ o' W _ z __
�• ()
,z IS
TBD z o 0
BD
o\ —N 1VNU a3a 31NIHN of 1-- - t
dgnr -N
'0191IIIINN V-1 I,
T5 'dN
Y
IN
W_ lldNlr > o
z Nn Q Q
J
a wo
Q J .
z w
z i K
F. w 3w
4 O
z IS
LU LIL `(
o� w w
it
i� w
mm �
ig
� a ,
m
------ - ----------
� may, i�4m
LU
w e
0
a -
i
4« �=ww
N. oa�� - - - - o
�yF o
w ,
0
o.
rcow
__ _ a k
z
w
— � w - w
m
od`
J W - 3 ~ -
---------------
a
� �
m�o
0
z
aw
�a
a
W
Z- i _ �
� r
ut
oar o ommissioners - ecem er
(doa)
.. Enm.
ITEM: 11-11 -2
+. �
�wsNoso�a3 W
� )v i
i �
WONiI 3
3215 L3dW111' '
'NO3W '
'0313 O
ONIINOOW '
'HNWIN L
L3HH10tliNNtlW H
H031 1
1101035 '
'1Ntl
31f703HOS 3l9tlOMNN31Ntl 03SOd021d
c - sr (6�6) :3 0611'�p 35N3�f1'�'N k cn�w +' sss :R — Z-3
(uNno� a oNVn rv'�3N)
s�e�sa aN 'naVaiiia
Y3MVOou1 V aadaw , l9ESl9 (fi16.�'d3'JIj�O
ie Navw oo1 31s 3o3a oost 11. Nry 1
NO isONin3INa d ItlOOtlaS2313OwO11NN .' 8 tl1.
33I 33
a
NV M-W s[9 ON HOIv ON NtlOIHOW
INOmisz 880SLZ :# Oltl Ntlld
51tlN01S53d°aN 3N1833NIM ZI, -8L4: #P81tl Ntlld J
a3 > ,a 03>
1i 0���
= w O
5 €a v w a
w
pop a _ W J �a 0I
sus W mu W n¢ s O L.. J 0 QZQ
:sd 2 000 a
ou "
z �� a
W m $=N<e WQ` Q N R
15 Z
v 02
1NU RI
--
p
Z
w m
H f :S O VIII=
.. Z
w
iZ.1 - _ - J Illlll Niw 9
Vl _
LL ❑
� x
�x
� o
N
Z -
a � -
H � 3
w
r
x >w
V1 r, L TEO
LJ
NN 9 a
o ZQ W
0 -
/ N
w" o = 5
z a
QQ w
C7 C7 Y
Board of ommissioners - December 1- 21017
ITEM: 11- 11 - 3
-eee In�s� :r
001 31� IVM nN ,nd 1- oos�
Nouva e OJ
u -.MOJ. evil YW
nsuouasNaon.�.N
osea las(dle) yd
65Eff199 (618 3�Ijj0
costa ON HDII
avoaNOAaisae
L.Nnoaa oNda—
soeez �N No.�N�w,
sNVi scow r NNavw �dss
ON NVOIHOW
OlV
880SLZ �# Oltl
99 SLY
y
i ter.
a
�NOisN3a �n3ewnN
S1tlN01SSHOHd 7N1tl33N19N383M I
�#
' �,
I SlItl130 lIA10
s asavdsad sNV�d
Y �.
P - -
w_
IIIIIII
K
LU
IL
L ui
II'
_
J
.�
,
Y
_
W
° ° / /� /,�� III IIII
rw
-
Q
off °� a
W
o� /� VIII
��
❑
m
X-111
o�
II11 H-1
- III
III
I_ l l
III
EE
pQM
U =
WO
-J
ill
W
/ /
o /
~
W
z
Z
m
_
m
H
K
=
— -
IH
_
W
H
W
❑ N
m
w w
w
w
_
w
°
w
a
o�
W
❑
-
W
_ -
o -
W
H
m
- o
J
7
U
w
m
Q W
C7
s
II o w o
Y o o m
m�
_
m
° ° w °
i ° w
_
--
O
O
.c
?
��
LU
_
- - °m
Z
- - - -
-
U
_
I
o
_
0
_
O LU
�
LU
4�5,'''`
WI
- - - - - -- - H
¢ w s
_
-0-
VIII
m
=
J
z
a a
�
Q
W
_
— —
�o
-
—I I�
0 —
—
III�IIIII
m
w
W
l
IIII I �� I
W
Z
IIII
mzo¢
o°
W N
IWIa`o
r_�
W
IIIIIIII II_
TIT
i
Z
'IrITI
Z
O -
-w" II fflF FII
`"
WH
��
mmmw� eye
w
Q - -
❑ 'ooi. LL.� °Y
0 o
'�
o� I I'
g
O
W
M
LU
U u
Z
O
Do
El
W
®
El
m
�y
F
y
o
z
/
_
F
w
O
LU
LU
-
o_
>w
�_
.m
a
-
°
IL
Z
0
-
x
W W
----------- a
o
a
W 8
qg e o aoe
a
FFxl
o
- -_
m
e,-- - - - - -- - -a - - - -o - -- -
a b
z _
CiW
`uN
LU
8
..
Z
IJ
IJ y`,
Board of Uommissioners - Uecember 1, 2U14
ITEM: 11- 11 - 4
oo� 3iisnsuse N s av llz tl a s N d'anaa�vss � iii3o a oosc
r5nnoi NVDmmw
tlOgOLES9IE''9� 49 #19 9 3 �90 S146N631�0�'1I'l'C'N
xvi
doljjO
eos¢ ON'H913PW
NOAa j
(0woos m)
db N11INw1
N1— 1n 1-
ON NVOIHOW
8809LZ :
w' g y
Al ;
-
ss:R "I 1 �
NOsN3a a3ewnN
V
S1'INOIS511111
NsIaIe N 3H3N01
ZL# 1VI V
FV llAlO
a
-111
pfl.
Q -z' -
5
0
Y /
•- Ns ie
:U
il
W N = 2
LLJ
LL
w
-
,
N ����
QLJ
_ _ - - • -
li
_- -
E
z
O
s
W
W -
O x 0 w
LU
N
o
-
O Z
= o
0
0 000a o 0000
2
0 O
-
z
- Q0
U
Ls
LU
Z
w �
OIDdO��]IDO��ll�lll
m
z
\
\
� z
W
:a,
a
z�
o
e
w-
ENE
-
`_�
a N
OIDdOtl��lID�Id0�ll0IDll
O
- - --- - -- - -- - -- --- - - - - -- - --- -
O
= o=
o
z
5
It
0
It
0
It
0
Q
z
—
o
W
z
W
W o
z-
Wr
Lu
zW
W
WW
C7
C7 $ma
C7
zoo
w
board of Uommissioners - Uecember 1, 1014
ITEM: 11-11 -5
2s,s -esr (r.,r,) :3JU3a 0611'�p 35N3�f1'�'N k En v+x 9sss :R
cwNnoo oNVn IN)
0
a3n
001 3iinse1 303a 0012 09E9 699186 XV� I Vi 11. 1wrvNavw 1 �'`
11-1— l9ESl99 (fi16�'d'JIj�O
N NOisN3a �a3ewnN 133
■3moi�=wr d3ad 3N> costa N1,113Na a 03a> ON NtlOIH 1. 3110
avoaNO,miIII 880SLZ# Oltl _ f I Slltll34 8 S310N
51tlN01S5id0Ad 3NIS33N ■N3 tl3MU1 U -8L4: #1'81tl yy- ltl�R11�313
m
" o
,
r
„
mi
W
r w
rn m
Z
r �z
w za
„ ° o
a
a
°
0
mz w z w
Is
Na
wPo
w o
°z
zo
w° <
z
°
W
-w' W °° z of
Ej
(/
a - - J
O H rc o O
Q
° °oe rY _zn nv' �� gaN fix. W
a OO OHO Oa O3 OW O W
y Z i
es
a
r - - ali
Of
S.
w - a
z a -
- - a - -
U- - - _ 3 - - - --
-
LU
oar o ommissioners -
,ember
ITEM: 11- 11 - 6
� S
0
°
pl
Z
O
K
--
4
ITEM: 11- 11 - 6
c - sr (6�6) :3 0011'�p 35N3�f1'�'N k En ^wn sss :R d31 Z-9
(uNnoa a3noNVn MIN) z s0
001 31i 3a 0012 OgEg.lgg lO6� XV� 3NVi ssow NNavw wss `�
ns N11 -1-3a lqE 9'IN (fi16�'d'JIjdO bars
IN NowsN mm
N =NOis n3a �a3ewnN 133
a3moi�=wr costa HOl3lva a 03a> ON NtlOIHOW ro 31100
avoaNO.misae 880SLZ :# Oltl II Slltll34 8 S310N
SIVN018001d ONIS33NION3 tl3M01 ZWSL4:# VRIV 1r3 IVOIU103l3
LU
It
a 3 W;
-w gip- a -
LU
"o =__ -
-_ _ ----- w
Lu
z )» W o 000
K Y LL B00
Zx
It a A J
_-7 O F
I W
It
Q
0
s ,1 C7 ffitLs K
❑ W p W
Q O, U
w z r
W
Q; w
W
J
7
W
2
U
K
milli
O
m
J
W
Z
a
oar ot commissioners - December -
-�o
II
�v
'I
�IIII
I
1
11
II
-Ie
-�o
II
�v
�IIII
I
1
11
II
ITEM: 11- 11 - 7
:
II
.I
�IIII
I
1
11
II
cs �s—esr (6 �6) :3J U3a
a�vMnavd is N3a3a oosc
001 31ins
N 1l1-1—
a3moi�=wr
0611'�p 35N3�f1'�'N
p9Eg199Ifi6� XV6
1gE9- 9 616�'d'JIj60
costa ON'HJ13II
avoaNO.Qllsae
(uNnon a3noNVn M3 N)
3NViessoI �wriNavw,wss
ON NtlOIHOW
8809LZ # Oltl
x -EO r'x1
sss :R — C_3
s0
�NOisN3a �a 3ewnN 13
SlItl130 S S31ON
51tlN01S53i0Ad 7NI833NI9N3 tl3MU1
UVOL441'81tl
y
`JN�ONnoa°J
d3ad 3N>
a 03a>
31ON
W
sp
£
I: <u ::8.
�s�
W.
uB'8
It
ds:
®
ry
Z
J
F
m W
It
❑
WQ
z
7
!ffi
W
Sg
88
7
2512
LU
Q
\
It
®
w
Z
�
W
a
c pm Q;p�<�
:�R :�R p3z�
It
O
uGf Z f .�
w
J
❑
J
$o
W
Z
K
Q
U
o
Oaf
0
Z�
a
7y
Q N
Vly
❑
C7
Js
W
as
Om
u;
3
w
8
-
❑
z
w
g
sgi =o
BWmg
o:
8e2
IS
~ o S W8
51<
z<o -
2=8
\ \ \
>
®
\\
m
W
3
a p
OF w
4
0
z
g° "�
�� ���
w
m
Q
E�
m
\ \ \\
/\
W s ffi .r -s 8
O
U
a
0
It
o ce<
Rz s,a
z
oW
°se : °sm
❑
o e
W� z
3
a
u
❑
m
❑
It
0
❑
�z
o:
Z
w
o
z
O
o
W
z
O
It
W
y
��
W
K
O
mo mo
Ls
U
-
- - -
S s s 00
"HHIIYYNN
-
�
LU
a
o
w >
LA
z
ZOO w
w a LL
H
0 o
O p
z
❑
O
z
0
¢ 0
3
e
w �
LL
E
C7
x a.
K
O
H
08 see
Board of Uommissioners - Uecember 1, 2U14
ITEM: 11- 11 - 8
A
AMERICAN TOWER"
C U R P O R L L I O N
New Hanover County Planning & Inspections — Planning & Zoning
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Application of American Toasters LLC to construct a new Wireless
Telecommunications Tower for the following site:
AT &T Site #: 478 -112
ATC Site #: 275088
Site Name: Mohican
Site Address: 5598 Marvin K. Moss Lane, Wilmington NC 28403
AMERICAN TOWERS LLC
American Towers LLC ( "AT ") is one of the leading independent owner and operator of shared
wireless infrastructure. The core business of American Towers LLC involves the engineering,
deployment, marketing, ownership, operation and leasing of shared wireless communications
sites. The sharing of infrastructure among multiple services lies at the heart of American
Tower's business philosophy. Our portfolio of wireless communication sites, including existing
towers and rooftops, enables our customers to serve their markets more efficiently and with
sensitivity to local planning and zoning jurisdictions. American Towers LLC designs all of our
facilities for multiple collocation opportunities for our customers. We endeavor to assist
communities in reducing the number of towers in a given jurisdiction by supplying our
customers with locations that are ready for them "Just in Time" for their coverage design and
wireless performance needs. As one of the largest tower companies in the world, American
Towers LLC has master lease agreements, negotiated at arms - length, with all major wireless
carriers licensed to operate in North Carolina. In negotiating the rental rates of these master
lease agreements, American Towers LLC considers the competitive environment of its business
and the presence of other major tower companies such as Crown Castle and SBA. This ensures
that American Towers LLC charges only reasonable rates to service providers.
Colocation Certification
American Towers LLC agrees to comply with the Zoning Ordinance of New Hanover County,
NC and is willing to permit other user(s) to attach communication equipment which do not
interfere with the primary purpose of the tower, provided that such other users agree to negotiate
a reasonable compensation to the owner from such Iiability as may result from such attachment.
AmeriCiff Toweks LLC
By: 'V -
Ma garet Robinson, Z-offing MinagW -- ev; -s4
NPRALt:44533 EJ
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 12 -1
PHOTO PRESENTATION
American Tower Corporation
Wireless Communications Facility Documentation
The proposed 195.0'agl Monopole Telecommunications Facility is to be located at or near 5591 Marvin K Moss Lane,
Wilmington, NC 28409. The site coordinates are N341108134.40911 W 77° 52' 13.856': The site elevation is 27.3 ft
AMSL.
GRAHAM HERRING COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE GRAPHIC SERVICES
PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTY SERVICES TO THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY
I c,a I, • r. —. ` On 20 1> 1(,65—d 11 ':
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 1
N
� 00
rl Gp
� O
H
E�
A<
V
s�
U
0
III
V
III
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 2
0
0
0
n�
�0
N
r-1 GO
� pp
� O
h W
H �
C
_AW
O
O
I!I
0
F
V
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 3
G
N
h
C
C
rJ
ti
40
�C
C
010
TAI
V1 h
00
r-...
C4
O
P.M
Ax
is
4. IF
till
P11-,v ,41V
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 4
Cv
ti
N
00 �
H W
H
V-jd
V
0
00
U
0
oc
u
o�
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 5
0
0
0
x
w
w
N
d
0
0
r.,
0
d
N
r�-I 00
� 00
� O
H �
H
L
O
E�
7
III
V
III
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 6
O
O
A
W
j
a
ti
O
r�
4
1
O
b
bG
N
� 00
� pp
� O
H �
d
V
h
0
0
sir
u
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 7
N
0
0
w
w
0
2
r
,
JJI
I
i
I
• 4 Y.
i
Ilk i I
S
d
ti f
y
A{ r r
I
ipy
J
JJI
I
i
I
• 4 Y.
i
Ilk i I
S
d
ti f
y
A{ r r
..1
lr' y r. ♦� S
F
1 V
d
1,
r
• .. � > .. �� 4 Tai
N
'� ap
010
� N
W �
� N
�U
CA
U
O
N
U
O
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 10
O
0
O
w
1�10
0
c
0
9
G
0
L/
� � Q
� N �
� W �
III
}
V
�C
III
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 11
O
d
w
w
d
c
.h
ti
N
� 00
� Op
� O
W
H �
�U
d
V
�-a
H
s,
•
t�
1
i
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 12
�-t
Q
TM�I
V1
0
c.
0
C
0
g-
0
n
N
� pp
� O
C/1 �
E'" V
�H
all
O
N
r
0
Y[
II1
V
III
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 13
LD
Q
O
C
w
W
IR..ga
a
0
a
4
N
� 00
� pp
� O
H �
�U
C
0
N
4
oc
0
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 13 - 14
0
0
0
w
w
a
A
A TC2 75088
SITE #A T& T 478 -112
"MOHICAN NC"
TO BE LOCATED EAST OFMASONBORO LOOP ROAD AT
5591 MARVIN K. MOSS LANE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
Asper submitted plans
PREPARED BY:
GRAHAM HERRING COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
GRAHAM HERRING GRI
8052 GREY OAK DRIVE, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 -1
IMPACT STATEMENT
This report addresses whether the proposed use is in compliance with the purpose and
intent of the plan of development of New Hanover County, N. C., Land Use and Zoning
Ordinance, and is a compatible use in the area where it is to be located. In preparing this
report, I inspected the site and surrounding areas in the district and reviewed the site plans
for the facility provided by Tower Engineering Professionals, for an application for a
Special Use Permit by American Tower Corporation. I have also consulted and reviewed
with area local appraisers, developers, tax authorities and reviewed the public records in
similar recent zoning cases in various jurisdictions in New Hanover County and prior
applications in New Hanover County, NC and the City of Wilmington, N. C.
PROPOSED FACILITY
The proposed facility will consist of a One Hundred Ninety Five Foot (195.0') monopole
wireless communications tower. The site will be comprised of a developed area as
described in the site plans and engineering plans that were submitted. The fencing
surrounding the site will be a chain link fence at least eight (8.0') feet in height, around
the twenty foot by eighty six foot compound (20.0' by 86.0'); located in the developed
lease area as described in the plans that were submitted. There will be a six (6) inch thick
gravel weed barrier inside the fenced area and extending one (1) foot outside the fenced
area. Landscaping will meet or exceed the Ordinance requirements for this project. The
area is zoned mostly R -15. The parent tract is shown in the County Records as Tax
Parcel Number: R07600 -003- 017 -000.
Graham A Herritrg Real Estate
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 - 2
Impact Statement
October 6, 2015
Page 2
BACKGROUND
In general we have found that the factors that primarily affect property values are use,
zoning, topography, and market demand. As the factors change, so do the current market
value and development potential of any parcel of real estate.
While the value of a parcel of real property may be affected by the use of adjoining or
surrounding property, that use must be significant in its intrusiveness or lack of
compatibility in order to override the primary factors that affect property values. Uses
which generate significant traffic, noise, odor, or dangerous conditions are generally the
types of uses which are so intrusive as to override the normal factors affecting property
values, and result in a material adverse impact on surrounding properties. For example,
hog farms, rock quarries, paper mills, manufacturing plants, adult entertainment
establishments, and similar uses, are generally believed to have a negative impact on the
value of surrounding properties. In addition, development of property in a manner, which
is significantly incompatible with existing or planned use of surrounding property, can
result in a negative impact on property immediately adjacent to the incompatible use.
Our examination of the effects of the existing transmission tower and broadcast tower
sites on surrounding properties, and our examination of other studies on this subject and
available data, indicates that, in general, these type towers are not the type of use, which
is so intrusive as to have an inherently negative impact on surrounding properties so long
as the set backs are sufficient as to not cause an adjoining property to not be able to be
used or developed for its highest and best use under the jurisdictions zoning restrictions.
Graham A Herring Real Estate 2
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 - 3
tmpact Statement
October 6, 2015
Page 3
SUMMARY
My personal inspection of the site and surrounding areas, and public records revealed the
following:
1. Located immediately to the north of the proposed site and parent tract is heavily
wooded land of the UNCW Marine Sciences Campus and further north a single
family residential development along Captains Lane.
2. Located immediately to the west of the proposed site is the heavily wooded and
undeveloped campus lands along Marvin K. Moss Lane out to Masonboro Loop
Road where there are single family homes, and developments that will have very
limited view of the proposed tower facility.
3. Located to the south of the proposed site are heavily wooded lands, scattered
single family homes, and a proposed single family /recreational development that
will have access east to the Inland Waterway.
4. Located east of the proposed site is the UNCW Marine Sciences Campus and its
facilities with boat and marine equipment.
S. That the visibility of the facility will be very limited along Masonboro Loop Road
at ground level due to the existing vegetation, placement and separation from the
existing developed and uses around the parent tract. (As demonstrated in the
Photo Simulation and Annotated Aerial and Ground Map Report). The areas
outside fenced compound will be left undisturbed in order to maintain the existing
wooded areas and vegetation near the site.
In summary, my personal inspection of this proposed site and other tower locations in
North Carolina, in the jurisdictions of Cumberland, Robeson, Bladen, Onslow, Moore,
Sampson, Cities of Fayetteville, Raleigh, Wilmington and many others, my personal
Expert Witness Testimony in over one thousand seven hundred (1,700) zoning hearings
for the record in these and many other jurisdictions across the southeast, my review of
industry data regarding all types of wireless transmission towers, indicates that, in
general, wireless telecommunication tower facilities do not have a inherently deleterious
affect on surrounding properties. Our review of the Facility to be constructed at the Site,
and personal inspection of the Site and surrounding area, indicate that the planned facility
Graham B. Herring Real Estate 3
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 - 4
Impact Statement
October 6, 2015
Page 4
is generally compatible with the area's existing and proposed uses, and developed as
proposed it will have no substantial negative impact on existing or planned development
of the surrounding properties.
Moreover, this Telecommunications Facility, built as planned, will have no detrimental or
injurious effect on the property values of the surrounding neighborhood or other
improved or unimproved properties in the general vicinity. Finally, the nature of this
location, with its separation from the residential arterials located to the north of the
proposed site, the unimproved areas and mixed uses nearby, heavily wooded areas, is
such that the proposed development will not create any negative aesthetic effects on
scenic roadways or other unique natural features.
DISCLAIMER
This document is not to be construed as an appraisal of real property, It is an assessment of empirical data
and written expression of opinion of impact of this particular planned project, based on the experience of
the author of this document. This document is not to be reproduced in whole or in part; disseminated to the
public, nor is it to be used for any purpose other than the reason intended No opinions of value or
opinions of the correctness or accuracy of the engineering designs or plans submitted for this project are
expresseg implied or intended by the author.
Graham B. Herring, GRI
NC Brokers License #30791
SC Brokers License #13554
(i'
3k�OUJA
Date: 4 &-f
Graham B. Herring, G
Graham A Herring Real Estate
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 - 5
4
OVERVIEW OF THE CREDENTIALS OF GRAHAM HERRING, LICENSED
NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTH CAROLINA REAL ESTATE BROKER, AND
GRADUATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA REALTORS
INSTITUTE.
GRAHAM B. HERRING, GRI
8052 Grey Oak Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina
Experience:
Licensed Real Estate Broker in North Carolina for 38 years
Licensed South Carolina Real Estate Broker
Mortgage Lending and Appraising, 6 Years (Single Family Residential)
Land Development (Commercial and Residential)
Shopping Center development, leasing and sales
Industrial, Office and Institutional, Commercial properties; development, leasing and
sales.
Specialized Computer enhanced photography (Photo Simulations)
Site Acquisition, Telecommunications, Radio, Television, and EMS /911 Facilities
SHPO North and South Carolina/ remediation work
Residential /Builder Construction lending
Certificate of Completion, United States Savings and Loan League Single Family
Residential Appraising Course.
Past Executive Director of the Nash County, and Rocky Mount Homebuilders
Association
Graduate of the North Carolina Homebuilders Institute
Graduate of the North Carolina Insurance Institute
Graduate of the International Shopping Center Institute School of Management and
Leasing
Graduate of the University of Pennsylvania/Wharton School Of Investment Real Estate
Consulted with City Municipalities and County Governments. Concerning Potential
Impact of Telecommunications Facilities, in planning and study meetings.
Appeared as an expert witness in over 1700 Zoning Hearings, in 67 counties, and 65
jurisdictions in North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Florida and South Carolina
Consulted with developers concerning planning and placement of telecommunications
facilities in planned developments, i.e.: Weston, and Wakefield.
Testified as an expert witness regarding impact on surrounding properties of
Telecommunications Facilities in Board of Adjustment and Commissioners hearings
throughout North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Florida and South Carolina.
Conducted Market and Tracking Studies in several counties including Wake and Orange
counties, on the development of telecommunications facilities, and the sale of improved
residential properties in developments that are surrounding such facilities, and
comparison studies of such.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 14 - 6
NEW HANOVER COUNTY 230 Government Center Drive
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
910- 798 -7165 phone
A UTHORITY FOR 910- 798 -7053 fax
APPOINTMENT OFAGaLNT www.nhcgov.corn
Please note that for quasi-judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case
at the public hearing.
The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent
for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or
I
n appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby
authorized to, on behalf of the property owner.
1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials
2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner
3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or
indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning
Ordinance.
Agcla# Iuforma1ion
roperly Owners)
;Snb�ect. Poperiy .
Name
Owner Name
Address
Thomas H_ Johnson, Jr., Esq.
Board of Trustees UNCW Endowment
5598 Marvin K. Moss Lane
Company
Owner Name 2
City, State, Zip
Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Wilmington, NC 28403
Address
Address
Parcel ID
4141 Parklake Avenue, Suite 200
601 South College Road
R07600- 003 -017 -000
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Raleigh, NC 27612
Wilmington, NC 28403 -5918
Phone
Phone
919.653.7807
910.962.2074 (Steve Pickard)
Email
Email
tjohnson@nexsenpruet.com nexsenpruet.com
Pickards unew.edu
Case Number Reference:
Date Time received:
Received by:
j 14
This document was willfully executed on the day of Llg , 20_
l
Owner 1 Signature Owner 2 Signature
Ch�rz, L)AJC- W Mw MWr S
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 15 - 1 04114
i
FAA Aeronautical Evaluation
Mohican
478 -112
O 2011 Sitesafe, Inc. Arlington, VA
For more information contact:
faa @sifesafe.com
770.532.3255 phone
703.77A.1 1 A9 fnx
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 1
Oily amass fe
rf compliance experts
SITE SPECIFIC EVALUATION
FOR
Client Site Name: Mahican
Client Site Number: 478 -112
Client Site Location.: Wilmington, NC.
Client/Requestor Name: Greg Csaapo Date: 118114
Company Name. American Tower
Address: 3500 Regency Parkway, Ste 1000
Address: Cary, NC. 27518
This is an evaluation based on application of surfaces identified in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part
77 and Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules Part 17.
EXECUTIVE ,SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
a The maximum height that can be built at this site without notice to the FAA
is 200 feet AGL or 225 feet AMSL.
• Maximum No Extended Study height at this site is 499 AGL, or 524 AMSL.
• Maximum No Hazard height at this site is 499 AGL, or 524 AMSL.
a Maximum no marking and lighting height at this site is 200 AGL, or 225 AMSL.
SITE DATA SUBMITTED FOR STUDY
Type of Structure: Antenna
Coordinates of site: Lat: 340 8' 52.5"
Long: 770 52' 0.0"
Datum: NAD 83
Site Ground Elevation: 25
Total Height above the ground of the entire structure (AGL): 199
Overall height of structure above mean sea level (AMSL): 224
Note: This report is for planning purposes only. If notification to the FAA or FCC is submitted on a sate
(whether it is, or is not required), a determination of no hazard or an approval letter should be received
prior to any actions taken at this site. I
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 2
AIRPORT AND HELIPAD INFORMATION
Nearest public use or Government Use (DOD) facility is Wilmington International.
This structure would be located 7.5 NM or 46141 FT from the airport on a bearing of 346
degrees true to the airport,
Nearest private use facility is Pilots Ridge.
This structure would be located 3.2 NM from the airport on a bearing of 215 degrees true
to the airport.
FINDINGS
AM Facilities:
(The FCC protects AM transmission stations from possible electro magnetic interference for a distance of
3.0 kni for directional facilities, and 1.0 km for non - directional facilities. Any antenna structures within
these distances will most likely require a detuning evaluation of the site) (Sitesafe offers a full range of
detuning services)
For a free analysis of this site against the most current FCC data, go to our AM
evaluation web site at http : / /sitesafe.com. A negative certificate can be generated, (on-
line) if no conflict is found. If a conflict is found, our AM Detune will contact you to
review the findings.
This site was evaluated against the FCC's AM antenna database, and is not within an AM
transmission area.
FCC Notice Requirements:
(FCC .Rules, Part 17)
This structure does not require notification to the FAA or FCC based on these rules.
FAA EMI:
(The FAA protects certain air navigational aids and radio transmitters from possible electro- magnetic interference.
The distance and direction are dependent on the type of facility be evaluated. Most of these transmission and receiver
facilities are listed in the National Flight Data Center (NFDC) database)
This site would not affect any FAA air navigational aids or transmitters listed in the
NFDC database.
Military Airspace:
This structure will not affect this airspace.
Note: This report is for planning purposes only. If notification to the FAA or FCC is submitted on a site
(whether it is, or is not required), a determination of no hazard or an approval letter should be received
prior to any actions taken at this site. 2
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 3
FAA Evaluation:
FAR Part 77 paragraph 9 (FAR 77.9). Construction or Alteration requiring notice:
(These are the imaginary surfaces that the FAA has implemented to provide general criteria for notification
purposes only.)
This structure does not require notification to the FAA.
FAR Part 77 paragraph 17(FAR 77.17). Standards for Determining Obstructions:
(These are the imaginary surfaces that the FAA has implemented to protect aircraft safety. If any of these
surfaces are penetrated, the structure may pose a Hazard to Air Navigation.)
This structure does not exceed these surfaces.
MARKING AND LIGHTING
FAA Advisory Circular 7017460 -1
Marking and lighting is not required for this structure.
RECOMMENDATIONS OR ACTIONS
SiteSafe does not consider this site to be a Hazard to Air Navigation as specified in FAR
part 77.
There were no airspace restrictions located for this property below 499' AGL.
Note: This report is for planning purposes only. If notification to the FAA or FCC is submitted on a site
(whether it is, or is not required), a determination of no hazard or an approval letter should be received
prior to any actions taken at this site. 3
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 4
ACME Mapper 2.1 - 8.4 km SW of Wrightsville Beach NC Page 1 of 1
531t i
http: / /mapper.acme.com/ Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014 1/8/2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 5
A
AMERICAN TOWER®
L Q It P 0 R A T 1 0 N
To: New Hanover County Planning Department
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Affnclavit in Support of Application of American Towers LLC for issuance of a
Special Use Permit to construct a new
Wireless Telecommunications Tower on the following site:
Site Name: Mohican
Site Address: 5591 Marvin K, Moss Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409
AMERICAN TOWERS LLC
American Towers LLC ( "AT ") is one of the leading independent owners and operators of shared wireless
infrastructure. The core business of American Towers LLC involves the engineering, deployment,
marketing, ownership, operation and leasing of shared wireless communications sites. The undersigned,
as the US Zoning Manager for American Towers LLC, does hereby affirm and certify as follows:
Section 63.5 -1(F) Certifications
a. The Wireless Communication Facility for which the Special Use Permit is being requested will at
all times comply with the applicable development standards under Section 63.5 -1 of the New
Hanover County Zoning Ordinance.
b. The „construction or placement of the tower and related structures on the site referenced above
will comply with the provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, FCC Rules Sections 1.1311, 1.1312, 1.1307 and all other
applicable federal, state and local Iaws.
C. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility at all times will be maintained and operated in
accordance with, all applicable FCC rules and regulations with respect to electromagnetic and /or
radio frequency emissions, individually and cumulatively.
American rs LLC
By:
Margaret Robinson, Zoning Manager
Sworn to and subscribed before me
4/thotary day of October, 2014 .S.E'
LESLIE R. CORBIN
�..
Notary Public C j 1li0N4YEA13H C "r lA AACHUSETTS lic r, `• ; 1: : , ; 'lyly Commission
May 29, 2020
My Commission Expires:
10 Presidential Way • Woburn, MA 41801 + 781.926.4500 Office • 781.926.4555 Fax • www.americarttower.corn
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 16 - 6
l a 4 &t
5715 Glenwood Avenue, 3rd Floor
Raleigh, NC 27612
DATE: September 24, 2013
SUBJECT: FCC Compliance Assessment for Proposed AT &T Mobility Site 478 -112
AT &T Mobility has been requested to evaluate the radio frequency emissions of our proposed site
478 -112. In addition, AT &T Mobility has been requested to address other RF related topics such as
transmitter operation and maximum permissible output power levels. The remainder of this report will
address all RF related items requested by New Hanover County ZoninglPIanning for proposed site 478-
112.
Transmitter Operation
AT &T Mobility owns the C LTE Bands and B PCS Band PCS licenses in New Hanover County.
The transmitters being used on the proposed site are authorized to operate in the 740 -746 and 1950 -1965
Megahertz (MHz) frequency range. The Ericsson Node B base station transmitters AT &T Mobility utilizes
have a maximum output level of 60 watts. AT &T Mobility utilizes the GSM, LTE and UMTS digital
technology. As a result our transmitters utilize Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying (GMSK), 16 -State
Quadrature Amplitude (16QAM), 64 -State Quadrature Amplitude (64 QAM) and Quadrature Phase Shift
Keying (QPSK) modulation. Precision filters limit unwanted and spurious emissions to levels below the
FCC specification. The signals being transmitted will not interfere with the operation of commercial radio,
cellular radio, television, telephone or other FCC approved communication equipment. For our proposed
site 478 -112, GSM technology will not be deployed.
Maximum Permissible Output Power
The maximum permissible output power for 1900 band per sector is 1640 Watts of effective
radiated power (ERP) from the antennas in New Hanover County. The proposed site 478 -112 is only
transmitting 506 total watts ERP.
The maximum permissible output power for 700 band per sector is 1000 Watts of effective
radiated power (FRP) from the antennas in New Hanover County. The proposed site 478 -112 is only
transmitting 143 total watts ERP.
RF Exposure (VIER levels)
The FCC states in 47 CFR 1. 13 10 that the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) level from non -
ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) to the general population at cellular and PCS frequencies is 1.0
milliwatt per centimeter squared (mWfcml). MPE is a measure of the RF power density at or below which
there are no potential harmful effects from the exposure_
Power density calculations are based on guidelines given by the ANSI Standard C95.1 -1992 and
are based on a worst case scenario. For analysis purposes, worst case conditions were chosen for all output
power levels based on the deployment of LTE and UMTS technologies. The site is being deployed initially
with 6 transmitters. For analysis purposes, 15 transmitters were used. A summary of the results of the
power density calculations for site 478 -112 is listed below in Table 1 and Table 2.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 17 - 1
Distance From Tower
(Feet)
Power Density (mw /cm2)
% FCC
Standard
1
0.0001253
0.050110
25
0.0000631
0.025256
50
0.0002299
0.091947
75
0.0004371
0.174848
100
0.0004441
0.177659
Table 1: Power Density Summary for Site 478 -112 for 1900 Band
Distance From Tower
(Feet)
Power Density (mw /cm2)
% FCC
Standard
1
0.0000135
0.0110608
25
0.0000402
0.0328273
50
0.0000570
0.0464942
75
0.0000518
0.0423179
100
0.0000761
0.0621514
Table 2: Power Density Summary for Site 478 -112 for 700 Band
As shown in Table 1, the maximum power density will not exceed 0.0004441mW /cmz at ground
level in 1900 Band and as shown in Table 2, the maximum power density will not exceed
0.0000761 mW /cmz at ground level in 700 Band. Moreover, the average energy expected near ground level
is less than 1% of the MPE level. This level does not exceed the MPE limit set by the Federal
Communications Commission or the American National Standards Institute.
Based upon the ANSI/FCC standard and the predicted levels of electromagnetic energy emitted by
site 478 -112, this installation will be of no safety concern to the general public.
If there are any further questions regarding the information provided I can be reached at (919) 852 -2721.
Sincerely
David J. LaCava
Senior Radio Access Network Specialist
AT &T Mobility
Tel: 919 7$$ -2465
E-mail: DL2246(a)att.com
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 17 - 2
at &t
David J. LaCava
Senior Radio Access Network Specialist
5715 Glenwood Avenue, P Floor
Raleigh, NC 27612
DATE: September 24, 2013
SUBJECT: RE Justification for AT &T Wireless Site 478 -112
AT &T Mobility has been requested to provide justification for our proposed site 478 -112. AT &T
Mobility is currently in the process of enbancing /expanding our existing coverage in New Hanover County.
The proposed site will provide improved coverage to Mohican Trail, Masonboro Loop Rd, Masonboro
Island and surrounding areas. Existing structures have been utilized whenever possible. Figure 1 shows the
general area within New Hanover County that the new site will be located. In Figure 1 blue text and
corresponding icons indicate the location of all existing sites and the white text box indicates the location of
the proposed site.
Fi ure 1:
Map of AT &T Wireless' Existinu
and Proposed Sites
SeledIRarket
sYON[1{cfCO4 r
LAflSnOM'WE
CPiztlCNS F {AM
AYENSNFW!
ESTATES
CAEEk •ry,
i
Q
A"LEY
NFL"P N
d SHtrlIN
EAST
-
CPLA WF
IAw
15"113 EYElo*1E4
CWEST PAW%
s NO WE EfN
SCnFr- 3{LEGO
1—
YJ
Ia
PAWS1a
'Ell=Y /E
�
1TI
TWEE
LAND YnE
99u fH
WHFTlrpipST
S Ap�F FEd@
K {SON
� P�unAT,cK ENSLL gEATSA
�
9x7
LdnLjrt.N • Y
Td
rn.R Er:: nark
tilong:34.148243,- 77.865375
r�
lmrCR FiarnE u�
dmpow�Nxn1
FiiwEEli
rl`y1
wWlmsaT
111 4
�O
ur�i
)J
Q�
�r
NSB!t Srrr..4rgaurlre.W
°J
a
MOTLE
lY[h 8 3W td f 0.d.i 1e COrWglf t
su'+A �'
GWOYE
Masa�baro
SFanasj
rs!And
-z
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 18 - 1
Currently AT &T Mobility does not have adequate coverage in the concerning area. Refer to Figure 2,
which shows coverage without the proposed site 478 -112.
Figure 2: Map of AT &T Wireless' Coverage without 478 -112
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 18 - 2
With the addition of proposed site 478 -112 AT &T Mobility will provide improved coverage to
Mohican Trail, Masonboro Loop Rd and Masonboro Island. Refer to Figure 3 which shows coverage with
proposed site 478 -112.
Figure 3: Map of AT &T Wireless' Coverage with 478 -112
If there are any further questions regarding this data I can be reached at (919) 788 -2465.
David J. LaCava
Senior Radio Access Network Specialist
Raleigh, NC
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 18 - 3
TM
i
Products LLC
November 12, 2014
American Tower Corporation
1898 Leland Drive
Marietta, GA 30067
Attention: Julia Schnell
Reference: 195' Tapered Steel Pole
Site # 275088 Mohican, NC
Rohn File #: 212478
Dear Julia Schnell,
0, Boy 5999'
T*Ihoiiey 309 5-136 3000
PAX 309-t)66-3079
Toll Fier. 800- 727 -ROHN
The above referenced 195' Steel Tapered Pole is designed to meet the specified loading
requirements in accordance with ASCE 7 -10 Ultimate Wind Speed (No Ice) of 147 MPH & 30
MPH with 0.25 inches of radial ice as per ANSI /TIA/222 -G -2. Structure Class 11, Exposure
Category C; Topographic Category: 1.
It is our understanding that the design of the referenced pole may require consideration of a
contained fall radius in the event a catastrophic wind speed were to result in a failure. Although
the pole is not designed to fail, stronger sections than required by analysis are provided in the
lower portion of the pole. This would result in an increased safety factor in the lower sections.
This design would enable the pole to fail through a combination of bending and buckling in the
upper portion of the pole should a catastrophic wind loading occur. Failure in this manner would
result in the upper portion of the pole folding over the lower portion resulting in a fall radius
equal to 35 feet. The failure mode would theoretically be a local buckling failure involving a
crippling of the pole on one side of the pole as opposed to the pole shearing off or completely
breaking off and hitting the ground.
Please contact us at your convenience should you have further questions concerning the safety of
pole structures or other aspects of pole design.
Sincerely,
Habib Azouri PE
Engineering Manager.
Rohn Products LLC
0
s SEAL
PE024061
Board of Commissioners - 'uedember 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 1
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088 , NC
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
ROHN Products LLC.
Design: 1 Engineer: don_g V-0
S U M M A R Y O F A N A L Y S I S R E S U L T S
Conditions ................... 147 mph Ultimate Wind Speed (no ice) 60 mph Operational
............................. 30 mph Basic Wind Speed (0.25" radial ice)
Building Code ................ EIA Revision G using ASCE 7 -10 Wind Speeds
Exposure ..................... C /
Gust response factor:........ 1.10
Structural Category.......... II
Topographic Category......... 1
Natural Frequency............ 0.47 cps
Resonant Velocity............ 9.43 mph
Pole Height .................. 195.00 ft
Top Diameter ................. 24.500 in
Bottom Diameter .............. 81.250 in
Embedment Depth .............. 0.00 ft
Pole Shape ................... 18 -sided Polygon /
Joint Type ................... Slip
Shaft Steel Weight........... 62.082 kips
POLE SHAFT PROPERTIES:
Page : 1
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
1
Wall
Mat'l
Top
Bottom
Slip
17.99
0.9911 ✓
Sect.
Thickness
Yield
Diameter Diameter
60.1646
Joint
169.08
Steel
Length
[t]
[Fy]
[Dt]
[Db]
Overlap
Taper
Weight
Seq (ft)
(in)
(ksi)
(in)
(in)
(in)
(in /ft)
(kips)
1 30.330
0.18750
65
24.500
33.910
53.00
0.3103
1.919
2 48.000
0.37500
65
32.010
46.900
73.00
0.3102
8.169
3 48.000
0.50000
65
44.110
59.000
92.00
0.3102
14.222
4 48.000
0.50000 i
65
55.460
70.360
110.00
0.3104
17.376
5 48.000
0.50000
65
66.350
81.250
123.33
0.3104
20.397
Design Bend Radius
= 2.5 inches
69.21
33341.4
16629.2
@Splice
POLE SHAFT SECTION MAXIMUM FORCES AND MOMENTS:
57.810
18.27
115.62
90.95
75668.9
37740.3
At Base of Section
@Bot
Max. Ratio
59.000
Sect.
Axial
Bending
92.84
Horiz.
40140.4
Actual
17.376
Elev.
Load
Moment
0.5000
Shear
Torsion
Allowable
Seq Load Case
(ft.)
(kips)
(ft -kips)
@Splice
(kips)
(ft -Kips)
[Ftot /Fb]
1
Combo005 164.67
12.7677
804.4786
45.1454
0.0000
17.99
0.9911 ✓
2
Combo005 118.04
28.1716
3396.2683
60.1646
0.0000
169.08
0.9455
3
Combo005 75.33
48.4688
6139.5625
68.6336
0.0000
0.8045
4
Combo005 34.25
72.6553
9111.1750
77.5284
0.0000
20.07
0.8890
5
Combo005 0.00
96.6210
12707.6500
85.8449
0.0000
0.3750
0.9557
85.36
DESIGN REACTIONS 4
109.6698
12707.6500
86.2551
57.4778
F
124.13
45.960
OPERATIONAL REACTIONS 4
81.5322
1917.9217
13.3639
8.9154
F
ADJUSTED REACTIONS 4
116.1874
13462.8519
91.3811
60.8936
F
55.37
SECTION PROPERTIES:
Diam Wall Diam/
Across Thick Thick
Weight Elev Flats [t] [W /t] [D /t] Area J I
Seq (kips) Location (ft) (in) (in) Ratio Ratio (in'2) (in^4) (in^4)
1
1.919
@Top
195.00
24.500
0.1875
17.99
130.67
14.47
2166.4
1080.5
@Splice
169.08
32.540
25.55
173.55
19.25
5104.8
2546.1
@Bot
164.67
33.910
26.83
180.85
20.07
5781.2
2883.4
2
8.169
@Top
166.04
32.010
0.3750
12.35
85.36
37.65
9545.3
4760.8
@Splice
124.13
45.960
18.91
122.56
54.26
28559.7
14244.3
@Bot
118.04
46.900
19.35
125.07
55.37
30363.1
15143.8
3
14.222
@Top
123.33
44.110
0.5000
13.44
88.22
69.21
33341.4
16629.2
@Splice
83.00
57.810
18.27
115.62
90.95
75668.9
37740.3
@Bot
75.33
59.000
18.69
118.00
92.84
80481.1
40140.4
4
17.376
@Top
82.25
55.460
0.5000
17.44
110.92
87.22
66736.9
33285.5
@Splice
43.42
67.510
21.69
135.02
106.34
120960.9
60330.0
@Bot
34.25
70.360
22.70
140.72
110.86
137060.3
68359.7
5
20.397
@Top
48.00
66.350
0.5000
21.28
132.70
104.50
114787.2
57250.8
@Bot
0.00
81.250
26.54
162.50
128.15
211667.2
105570.4
Total
Shaft Steel
Weight =
62.082 kips
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 2
M*NROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don_g
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
PROPERTIES:
Page: 2
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
( @ Max Segment = 5.0 ft)
Diam/
Diam.
Wall
Node
Across
Thick
Node
Elev.
Flats
[t]
No.
(ft)
(in)
(in)
58
195.000
24.50
0.1875
57
192.408
25.30
0.1875
56
189.817
26.11
0.1875
55
187.225
26.91
0.1875
54
184.633
27.72
0.1875
53
182.042
28.52
0.1875
52
179.450
29.32
0.1875
51
176.858
30.13
0.1875
50
174.267
30.93
0.1875
49
171.675
31.74
0.1875
480
169.083
32.54
0.1875
48I
169.083
32.01
0.3750
47
164.667
33.38
0.3750
46
160.917
34.54
0.3750
45
157.167
35.71
0.3750
44
153.417
36.87
0.3750
43
149.667
38.03
0.3750
42
145.917
39.20
0.3750
41
142.167
40.36
0.3750
40
138.417
41.52
0.3750
39
134.667
42.69
0.3750
38
130.917
43.85
0.3750
37
127.167
45.01
0.3750
360
124.125
45.96
0.3750
37I
127.167
44.11
0.5000
36
124.125
45.05
0.5000
35
121.083
46.00
0.5000
34
117.658
47.06
0.5000
33
114.233
48.12
0.5000
32
110.808
49.18
0.5000
31
107.383
50.25
0.5000
30
103.958
51.31
0.5000
29
100.533
52.37
0.5000
28
97.108
53.43
0.5000
27
93.683
54.50
0.5000
26
90.258
55.56
0.5000
25
86.833
56.62
0.5000
240
83.000
57.81
0.5000
25I
86.833
55.46
0.5000
24
83.000
56.65
0.5000
23
79.167
57.84
0.5000
22
76.050
58.81
0.5000
21
72.933
59.77
0.5000
20
69.817
60.74
045000
19
66.700
61.71
0.5000
18
63.583
62.68
0.5000
17
60.467
63.64
0.5000
16
57.350
64.61
0.5000
15
54.233
65.58
0.5000
14
51.117
66.55
0.5000
13
48.000
67.51
0.5000
120
43.417
68.94
0.5000
13I
48.000
66.35
0.5000
12
43.417
67.77
0.5000
11
38.833
69.20
0.5000
10
34.950
70.40
0.5000
Page: 2
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
( @ Max Segment = 5.0 ft)
Mard of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 3
Diam/
Thick
[W /t]
[D /t]
Area
J
I
Ratio
Ratio
(in^2)
(in ^4)
(in'4)
17.99
130.67
14.47
2166.4
1080.5
18.74
134.95
14.95
2388.6
1191.3
19.50
139.24
15.43
2625.4
1309.4
20.25
143.53
15.90
2877.3
1435.1
21.01
147.82
16.38
3144.9
1568.5
21.77
152.11
16.86
3428.5
1710.0
22.52
156.39
17.34
3728.8
1859.7
23.28
160.68
17.82
4046.0
2018.0
24.03
164.97
18.30
4380.8
2185.0
24.79
169.26
18.77
4733.6
2360.9
25.55
173.55
19.25
5104.8
2546.0
12.35
85.36
37.65
9545.2
4760.7
12.99
89.01
39.28
10840.0
5406.5
13.54
92.12
40.67
12027.1
5998.6
14.09
95.22
42.05
13297.7
6632.3
14.63
98.32
43.44
14654.9
7309.2
15.18
101.42
44.82
16101.5
8030.7
15.73
104.52
46.21
17640.2
8798.2
16.27
107.63
47.59
19274.0
9613.0
16.82
110.73
48.97
21005.7
10476.7
17.37
113.83
50.36
22837.9
11390.6
17.91
116.93
51.74
24773.9
12356.1
18.46
120.03
53.13
26816.3
13374.8
18.91
122.55
54.25
28552.9
14240.9
13.44
88.22
69.21
33341.4
16629.2
13.77
90.11
70.70
35552.9
17732.2
14.11
91.99
72.20
37859.7
18882.8
14.48
94.12
73.89
40574.6
20236.8
14.85
96.24
75.57
43415.9
21654.0
15.23
98.37
77.26
46387.2
23135.9
15.60
100.49
78.95
49491.1
24684.0
15.98
102.62
80.63
52730.1
26299.4
16.35
104.74
82.32
56107.7
27984.1
16.73
106.87
84.00
59626.3
29739.0
17.10
108.99
85.69
63289.3
31565.9
17.48
111.12
87.38
67099.3
33466.2
17.85
113.24
89.06
71058.9
35441.1
18.27
115.62
90.95
75672.4
37742.1
17.44
110.92
87.22
66742.8
33288.4
17.86
113.30
89.11
71169.1
35496.0
18.28
115.68
91.00
75787.4
37799.4
18.62
117.61
92.53
79688.4
39745.1
18.96
119.55
94.07
83721.4
41756.6
19.31
121.48
95.60
87888.2
43834.8
19.65
123.42
97.14
92190.6
45980.7
19.99
125.35
98.67
96631.7
48195.7
20.33
127.29
100.21
101213.1
50480.7
20.67
129.22
101.74
105936.6
52836.5
21.01
131.16
103.28
110805.3
55264.9
21.35
133.09
104.81
115820.5
57766.2
21.69
135.03
106.35
120985.2
60342.1
22.20
137.87
108.61
128856.0
64267.7
21.28
132.70
104.50
114787.2
57250.8
21.78
135.55
106.76
122389.1
61042.3
22.29
138.39
109.02
130320.0
64997.9
22.71
140.80
110.93
137301.2
68479.8
Mard of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 3
M*N ROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don g
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
FA
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 4
Page: 3
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
J
I
Diam.
Wall
144528.0
Diam/
152003.5
75812.7
Node
Across
Thick
83651.2
Thick
87765.5
Node
Elev.
Flats
[t]
[W /t]
[D /t]
Area
No.
(ft)
(in)
(in)
Ratio
Ratio
(in'2)
9
31.067
71.61
0.5000
23.14
143.21
112.84
8
27.183
72.81
0.5000
23.56
145.62
114.75
7
23.300
74.02
0.5000
23.99
148.03
116.67
6
19.417
75.22
0.5000
24.41
150.45
118.58
5
15.533
76.43
0.5000
24.84
152.86
120.49
4
11.650
77.63
0.5000
25.26
155.27
122.41
3
7.767
78.84
0.5000
25.69
157.68
124.32
2
3.883
80.04
0.5000
26.11
160.09
126.23
1
0.000
81.25
0.5000
26.54
162.50
128.15
FA
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 4
Page: 3
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
J
I
(in^4)
(in " 4)
144528.0
72084.3
152003.5
75812.7
159733.0
79667.8
167719.6
83651.2
175968.7
87765.5
184483.2
92012.2
193268.8
96394.0
202328.2
100912.5
211667.2
105570.4
Adff �fm i4q,
ROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don_g
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
DISCRETE APPURTENANCE PROPERTIES
Weight EPA
Elev. W/o Ice W/ Ice Offset W/o Ice W/ Ice
(ft) Description (kips) (kips) Az. (in) (ft"2) (ft "2) Lines
195.0 210 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (NO ICE) 3.30 4.50 0 12.25 210.00 234.00 (18) 1 -5/8 in.
234 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (W/ ICE)
185.0 175 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (NO ICE) 2.25 3.43 0 13.80 175.00 198.60 (12) 1 -5/8 in.
198.6 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (W/ ICE)
175.0 125 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (NO ICE) 2.00 3.18 0 15.35 125.00 148.60 (9) 1 -5/8 in.
148.6 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (W/ ICE)
165.0 105 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (NO ICE) 1.60 2.78 0 16.64 105.00 128.60 (9) 1 -5/8 in.
128.6 SQ. FT. EPA LOADING (W/ ICE)
LINEAR APPURTENANCE PROPERTIES 001 01
Elev Width
From To Weight Round Flat
(ft) (ft) Description (lb /ft) (in) (in).
0.0 195.0 3 /8in Safety Device 0.13 0.38 0.00
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 5
Page: 4
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
M
a" ROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don g Page: 5
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 11/12/2014
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088 9:11 AM
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
PRESSURES
ITEM: 11- 19 - 6
Elev.
W/o Ice
With Ice
Operational
Seg.
(ft)
Kz
Gh•gz
Cf
Gh•gz
Cf
Gh•gz
Cf
1 -11
193.704
1.455
84.090
0.650
3.502
1.200
12.535
0.650
1 -10
191.113
1.451
83.852
0.650
3.492
1.200
12.499
0.650
1 -9
188.521
1.446
83.611
0.650
3.482
1.200
12.463
0.650
1 -8
185.929
1.442
83.368
0.650
3.472
1.200
12.427
0.650
1 -7
183.338
1.438
83.122
0.650
3.462
1.200
12.390
0.650
1 -6
180.746
1.434
82.873
0.650
3.452
1.200
12.353
0.650
1 -5
178.154
1.429
82.621
0.650
3.441
1.200
12.316
0.650
1 -4
175.563
1.425
82.367
0.650
3.431
1.200
12.278
0.650
1 -3
172.971
1.420
82.109
0.650
3.420
1.200
12.239
0.650
1 -2
170.379
1.416
81.849
0.650
3.409
1.200
12.200
0.650
1 -1
166.875
1.410
81.492
0.650
3.394
1.200
12.147
0.650
2 -13
166.875
1.410
81.492
0.650
3.394
1.200
12.147
0.650
2 -12
162.792
1.402
81.068
0.650
3.376
1.200
12.084
0.650
2 -11
159.042
1.395
80.671
0.650
3.360
1.200
12.025
0.650
2 -10
155.292
1.388
80.267
0.650
3.343
1.200
11.965
0.650
2 -9
151.542
1.381
79.855
0.650
3.326
1.200
11.903
0.650
2 -8
147.792
1.374
79.435
0.650
3.308
1.200
11.841
0.650
2 -7
144.042
1.367
79.006
0.650
3.291
1.200
11.777
0.650
2 -6
140.292
1.359
78.568
0.650
3.272
1.200
11.711
0.650
2 -5
136.542
1.351
78.122
0.650
3.254
1.200
11.645
0.650
2 -4
132.792
1.343
77.665
0.650
3.235
1.200
11.577
0.650
2 -3
129.042
1.335
77.198
0.650
3.215
1.200
11.507
0.650
2 -2
125.646
1.328
76.766
0.650
3.197
1.200
11.443
0.650
2 -1
122.604
1.321
76.371
0.650
3.181
1.200
11.384
0.650
3 -14
125.646
1.328
76.766
0.650
3.197
1.200
11.443
0.650
3 -13
122.604
1.321
76.371
0.650
3.181
1.200
11.384
0.650
3 -12
119.371
1.314
75.942
0.650
3.163
1.200
11.320
0.650
3 -11
115.946
1.306
75.478
0.650
3.144
1.200
11.251
0.650
3 -10
112.521
1.297
75.003
0.650
3.124
1.200
11.180
0.650
3 -9
109.096
1.289
74.517
0.650
3.104
1.200
11.108
0.650
3 -8
105.671
1.280
74.018
0.650
3.083
1.200
11.033
0.650
3 -7
102.246
1.272
73.506
0.650
3.061
1.200
10.957
0.650
3 -6
98.821
1.262
72.981
0.650
3.040
1.200
10.879
0.650
3 -5
95.396
1.253
72.441
0.650
3.017
1.200
10.798
0.650
3 -4
91.971
1.244
71.885
0.650
2.994
1.200
10.715
0.650
3 -3
88.546
1.234
71.313
0.650
2.970
1.200
10.630
0.650
3 -2
84.917
1.223
70.688
0.650
2.944
1.200
10.537
0.650
3 -1
81.083
1.211
70.004
0.650
2.916
1.200
.10.435
0.650
4 -14
84.917
1.223
70.688
0.650
2.944
1.200
10.537
0.650
4 -13
81.083
1.211
70.004
0.650
2.916
1.200
10.435
0.650
4 -12
77.608
1.200
69.361
0.650
2.889
1.200
10.339
0.650
4 -11
74.492
1.190
68.765
0.650
2.864
1.200
10.250
0.650
4 -10
71.375
1.179
68.149
0.650
2.838
1.200
10.158
0.650
4 -9
68.258
1.168
67.512
0.650
2.812
1.200
10.063
0.650
4 -8
65.142
1.156
66.851
0.650
2.784
1.200
9.965
0.650
4 -7
62.025
1.145
66.164
0.650
2.756
1.200
9.862
0.650
4 -6
58.908
1.132
65.450
0.650
2.726
1.200
9.756
0.650
4 -5
55.792
1.119
64.705
0.650
2.695
1.200
9.645
0.650
4 -4
52.675
1.106
63.927
0.650
2.663
1.200
9.529
0.650
4 -3
49.558
1.092
63.111
0.650
2.629
1.200
9.407
0.650
4 -2
45.708
1.073
62.046
0.650
2.584
1.200
9.249
0.650
4 -1
41.125
1.050
60.681
0.650
2.527
1.200
9.045
0.650
5 -12
45.708
1.073
62.046
0.650
2.584
1.200
9.249
0.650
5 -11
41.125
1.050
60.681
0.650
2.527
1.200
9.045
0.650
5 -10
36.892
1.026
59.309
0.650
2.470
1.200
8.841
0.650
5 -9
33.008
1.002
57.936
0.650
2.413
1.200
8.636
0.650
5 -8
29.125
0.976
56.430
0.650
2.350
1.200
8.411
0.650
5 -7
25.242
0.947
54.755
0.650
2.281
1.200
8.162
0.650
5 -6
21.358
0.914
52.863
0.650
2.202
1.200
7.880
0.650
5 -5
17.475
0.877
50.676
0.650
2.111
1.200
7.554
0.650
5 -4
13.592
0.850
49.137
0.650
2.047
1.200
7.324
0.650
5 -3
9.708
0.850
49.137
0.650
2.047
1.200
7.324
0.650
5 -2
5.825
0.850
49.13377
0.650
2.047
1.200
7.324
0.650
5 -1
1.942
0.850
15
1.200
7.324
0.650
Board oT 6017 MjS0j.
rS -
December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 6
Ir
'� ROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don_g
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
MOMENTS, FORCES AND DEFLECTIONS
Moment Shear
Axial My Mz Vy Vz
Node Elev. (kips) (ft -k) (ft -k) (kips) (kips)
58 195.000 5.302 0.00 5.27 0.01 0.79
57 192.408 4.311 0.00 50.25 17.44 0.00
56 189.817 4.551 0.00 97.33 17.75 0.00
55 187.225 5.180 0.00 145.74 20.04 0.00
54 184.633 7.772 0.00 202.59 32.39 0.00
53 182.042 8.071 0.00 289.85 32.72 0.00
52 179.450 8.378 0.00 378.06 33.06 0.00
51 176.858 9.369 0.00 468.09 36.21 0.00
50 174.267 11.422 0.00 567.94 43.66 0.00
49 171.675 11.775 0.00 685.62 44.02 0.00
48 169.083 12.768 0.00 804.48 45.15 0.00
47 164.667 15.666 0.00 1014.52 53.33 0.00
46 160.917 16.592 0.00 1222.77 53.90 0.00
45 157.167 17.541 0.00 1433.40 54.48 0.00
44 153.417 18.513 0.00 1646.42 55.07 0.00
43 149.667 19.510 0.00 1861.87 55.68 0.00
42 145.917 20.530 0.00 2079.78 56.31 0.00
41 142.167 21.574 0.00 2300.18 56.95 0.00
40 138.417 22.637 0.00 2523.09 57.61 0.00
39 134.667 23.723 0.00 2748.54 58.28 0.00
38 130.917 24.834 0.00 2976.55 58.96 0.00
37 127.167 26.319 0.00 3207.16 59.59 0.00
36 124.125 28.172 0.00 3396.27 60.16 0.00
36 124.125 28.172 0.00 3396.27 60.16 0.00
35 121.083 29.770 0.00 3587.40 60.78 0.00
34 117.658 31.116 0.00 3804.92 61.43 0.00
33 114.233 32.487 0.00 4024.76 62.10 0.00
32 110.808 33.883 0.00 4246.94 62.77 0.00
31 107.383 35.305 0.00 4471.48 63.46 0.00
30 103.958 36.755 0.00 4698.39 64.15 0.00
29 100.533 38.228 0.00 4927.69 64.86 0.00
28 97.108 39.726 0.00 5159.40 65.57 0.00
27 93.683 41.250 0.00 5393.51 66.29 0.00
26 90.258 42.799 0.00 5630.06 67.02 0.00
25 86.833 45.205 0.00 5869.03 67.80 0.00
24 83.000 48.469 0.00 6139.56 68.63 0.00
24 83.000 48.469 0.00 6139.56 68.63 0.00
23 79.167 50.844 0.00 6413.46 69.39 0.00
22 76.050 52.323 0.00 6638.49 70.07 0.00
21 72.933 53.822 0.00 6865.45 70.75 0.00
20 69.817 55.346 0.00 7094.36 71.44 0.00
19 66.700 56.890 0.00 7325.22 72.13 0.00
18 63.583 58.453 0.00 7558.02 72.82 0.00
17 60.467 60.037 0.00 7792.76 73.52 0.00
16 57.350 61.644 0.00 8029.44 74.22 0.00
15 54.233 63.270 0.00 8268.05 74.92 0.00
14 51.117 64.917 0.00 8508.59 75.62 0.00
13 48.000 68.043 0.00 8751.04 76.49 0.00
12 43.417 72.655 0.00 9111.18 77.53 0.00
12 43.417 72.655 0.00 9111.18 77.53 0.00
11 38.833 76.042 0.00 9475.60 78.47 0.00
10 34.950 78.197 0.00 9787.51 79.33 0.00
9 31.067 80.385 0.00 1,0102.10 80.18 0.00
8 27.183 82.608 0.00 1,0419.33 81.02 0.00
7 23.300 84.864 0.00 1,0739.12 81.84 0.00
6 19.417 87.149 0.00 1,1061.40 82.65 0.00
5 15.533 89.468 0.00 1,1386.08 83.44 0.00
4 11.650 91.821 0.00 1,1713.04 84.23 0.00
3 7.767 94.205 0.00 1,2042.28 85.03 0.00
2 3.883 96.621 0.00 1,2373.81 85.84 0.00
1 0.000 96.621 0.00 1,2707.65 85.84 0.00
Page: 6
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
Operational
Torsion Deflection Twist Sway
(ft -k) (in) (deg) (deg)
0.838 27.624 0.054 1.482
0.000 / 26.820 0.052 1.478
0.000 26.019 0.050 1.470
0.000 25.224 0.048 1.458
0.000 24.435 0.046 1.444
0.000 23.655 0.043 1.425
0.000 22.886 0.040 1.403
0.000 22.130 0.037 1.377
0.000 21.389 0.035 1.348
0.000 20.665 0.031 1.315
0.000 19.959 0.029 1.280
0.000 18.794 0.026 1.234
0.000 17.836 0.023 1.201
0.000 16.905 0.021 1.166
0.000 16.002 0.020 1.130
0.000 15.128 0.018 1.092
0.000 14.284 0.016 1.054
0.000 13.471 0.015 1.015
0.000 12.688 0.014 0.976
0.000 11.936 0.013 0.937
0.000 11.214 0.012 0.898
0.000 10.524 0.011 0.859
0.000 9.985 0.010 0.831
0.000 9.985 0.010 0.831
0.000 9.464 0.009 0.803
0.000 8.897 0.009 0.775
0.000 8.350 0.008 0.748
0.000 7.823 0.008 0.720
0.000 7.315 0.007 0.694
0.000 6.826 0.007 0.667
0.000 6.356 0.006 0.641
0.000 5.905 0.006 0.616
0.000 5.472 0.006 0.590
0.000 5.057 0.005 0.566
0.000 4.659 0.005 0.541
0.000 4.235 0.005 0.513
0.000 4.235 0.005 0.513
0.000 3.833 0.004 0.486
0.000 3.522 0.004 0.464
0.000 3.226 0.004 0.442
0.000 2.945 0.004 0.420
0.000 2.677 0.003 0.399
0.000 2.423 0.003 0.378
0.000 2.183 0.003 0.357
0.000 1.956 0.003 0.337
0.000 1.742 0.002 0.316
0.000 1.542 0.002 0.297
0.000 1.354 0.002 0.277
0.000 1.101 0.002 0.248
0.000 1.101 0.002 0.248
0.000 0.875 0.002 0.220
0.000 0.705 0.001 0.196
0.000 0.554 0.001 0.173
0.000 0.422 0.001 0.150
0.000 0.309 0.001 0.127
0.000 0.214 0.001 0.105
0.000 0.136 0.001 0.083
0.000 0.077 0.000 0.062
0.000 0.034 0.000 0.041
0.000 0.009 0.000 0.020
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 7
L L
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
ACTUAL AND ALLOWABLE STRESSES
ROHN Products LLC.
Design: 1 Engineer: don -g
Page: 7
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 8
Actual Stresses
Allowable
Axial
Bending
Shear
Torsion
Combined
Stress
Combined
Elevation
[fa]
[fb]
[fv]
[ft]
[Ftot]
[Fb]
Stress
Node
(ft)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
Ratio
58
195.000
0.366
0.728
0.109
0.058
1.122
80.247
0.0152
57
192.408
0.288
6.503
2.334
0.000
12.237
79.357
0.0962
56
189.817
0.295
11.824
2.301
0.000
17.414
78.468
0.1727
55
187.225
0.326
16.652
2.521
0.000
23.331
77.579
0.2445
54
184.633
0.474
21.810
3.955
0.000
37.923
76.690
0.3261
53
182.042
0.479
29.453
3.882
0.000
44.999
75.800
0.4420
52
179.450
0.483
36.318
3.814
0.000
51.347
74.911
0.5491
51
176.858
0.526
42.577
4.065
0.000
59.623
74.022
0.6507
50
174.267
0.624
48.985
4.772
0.000
72.383
73.133
0.7590
49
171.675
0.627
56.151
4.689
0.000
78.768
72.243
0.8785
480
169.083
0.663
62.642
4.690
0.000
85.298
71..354
0.9911
482
169.083
0.339
32.955
2.398
0.000
39.045
82.550
0.4492
47
164.667
0.399
38.162
2.715
0.000
45.933
82.550
0.5204
46
160.917
0.408
42.900
2.651
0.000
50.334
82.550
0.5842
45
157.167
0.417
47.016
2.591
0.000
54.146
82.550
0.6397
44
153.417
0.426
50.599
2.536
0.000
57.455
82.550
0.6880
43
149.667
0.435
53.723
2.485
0.000
60.332
82.550
0.7301
42
145.917
0.444
56.451
2.437
0.000
62.836
82.550
0.7669
41
142.167
0.453
58.837
2.393
0.000
65.019
82.260
0.8019
40
138.417
0.462
60.925
2.353
0.000
66.922
81.616
0.8367
39
134.667
0.471
62.755
2.314
0.000
68.582
80.973
0.8686
38
130.917
0.480
64.357
2.279
0.000
70.031
80.330
0.8978
37
127.167
0.495
65.761
2.243
0.000
71.289
79.686
0.9248
360
124.125
0.519
66.774
2.218
0.000
72.213
79.165
0.9455
37I
127.167
0.380
51.830
1.722
0.000
55.176
82.550
0.7033
36
124.125
0.398
52.574
1.702
0.000
55.869
82.550
0.7135
35
121.083
0.412
53.241
1.684
0.000
56.488
82.550
0.7227
34
117.658
0.421
53.908
1.663
0.000
57.094
82.550
0.7318
33
114.233
0.430
54.494
1.643
0.000
57.624
82.550
0.7398
32
110.808
0.439
55.007
1.625
0.000
58.086
82.550
0.7468
31
107.383
0.447
55.456
1.608
0.000
58.487
82.550
0.7529
30
103.958
0.456
55.847
1.591
0.000
58.835
82.550
0.7583
29
100.533
0.464
56.186
1.576
0.000
59.134
82.166
0.7665
28
97.108
0.473
56.480
1.561
0.000
59.390
81.726
0.7748
27
93.683
0.481
56.731
1.547
0.000
59.607
81.285
0.7825
26
90.258
0.490
56.946
1.534
0.000
59.789
80.844
0.7898
25
86.833
0.508
57.127
1.523
0.000
59.953
80.403
0.7969
240
83.000
0.533
57.296
1.509
0.000
60.106
79.910
0.8045
25I
86.833
0.518
59.575
1.555
0.000
62.511
80.885
0.8260
24
83.000
0.544
59.698
1.540
0.000
62.615
80.391
0.8331
23
79.167
0.559
59.791
1.525
0.000
62.676
79.898
0.8397
22
76.050
0.565
59.843
1.514
0.000
62.703
79.497
0.8448
21
72.933
0.572
59.877
1.504
0.000
62.712
79.096
0.8496
20
69.817
0.579
59.894
1.494
0.000
62.707
78.694
0.8543
19
66.700
0.586
59.896
1.485
0.000
62.687
78.293
0.8588
18
63.583
0.592
59.884
1.476
0.000
62.655
77.892
0.8631
17
60.467
0.599
59.859
1.467
0.000
62.611
77.491
0.8673
16
57.350
0.606
59.823
1.459
0.000
62.557
77.089
0.8714
15
54.233
0.613
59.775
1.451
0.000
62.493
76.688
0.8754
14
51.117
0.619
59.719
1.443
0.000
62.421
76.287
0.8793
13
48.000
0.640
59.653
1.439
0.000
62.363
75.885
0.8833
120
43.417
0.669
59.544
1.428
0.000
62.251
75.295
0.8890
13I
48.000
0.651
61.790
1.464
0.000
64.584
76.368
0.9089
12
43.417
0.681
61.631
1.452
0.000
64.421
75.778
0.9141
11
38.833
0.698
61.459
1.440
0.000
64.229
75.188
0.9190
10
34.950
0.705
61.304
1.430
0.000
64.054
74.688
0.9229
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 8
�l � ROHN Products LLC.
m
File:
212478 Site:
1 Cycle: 1
Design: 1
Engineer:
don g
Customer:
AMERICAN TOWER
CORPORATION
Site:
MOHICAN NC 275088
Type:
POLE -TPR
Pole:
Tapered
Steel
Actual Stresses
Allowable
Axial
Bending
Shear
Torsion
Combined
Stress
Combined
Elevation
[fa]
[fb]
[fv]
[ft]
[Ftot]
[Fb]
Stress
Node
(ft)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
(ksi)
Ratio
9
31.067
0.712
61.140
1.421
0.000
63.871
74.188
0.9268
8
27.183
0.720
60.968
1.412
0.000
63.681
73.688
0.9306
7
23.300
0.727
60.788
1.403
0.000
63.484
73.188
0.9344
6
19.417
0.735
60.602
1.394
0.000
63.280
72.688
0.9380
5
15.533
0.743
60.409
1.385
0.000
63.070
72.188
0.9417
4
11.650
0.750
60.211
1.376
0.000
62.855
71.688
0.9453
3
7.767
0.758
60.007
1.368
0.000
62.636
71.188
0.9489
2
3.883
0.765
59.798
1.360
0.000
62.414
70.688
0.9524
1
0.000
0.754
59.586
1.340
0.000
62.135
70.188
0.9557
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 9
Page: 8
11/12/2014
9:11 AM
R" ROHN Products LLC.
File: 212478 Site: 1 Cycle: 1 Design: 1 Engineer: don g Page: 9
Customer: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 11/12/2014
Site: MOHICAN NC 275088 9:11 AM
Type: POLE -TPR
Pole: Tapered Steel
S U M M A R Y O F B A S E P L A T E D E S I G N
P L A T E
A N C H O R B O L T S
Pole Diameter at Base
= 81.25 in.
Size
= 2.25 in. X 84 in. Long
Plate Diameter
= 93.50 in.
Grade
= ASTM A615
Plate Thickness
= 2.50 in.
Plate Weight (Black)
= 2731.17 lbs
No. Of Bolts
= 24 r
Fy
= 50.00 ksi
Bolt Circle
= 88.000 in.
Fu
= 65.00 ksi
Fy
= 75.00 ksi
MAXIMUM POLE REACTIONS:
Axial = 109.67 kips
Moment = 12,707.65 ft -kips
Shear = 86.26 kips
Torsion= 57.48 ft -kips
PLATE:
Axial = 231.4 kips /bolt
Moment = 2.8 in- kips /bolt
Shear = 4.2 kips /bolt ./
ANCHOR BOLT STRESS RATIO = 0.923 < 1.0 OK
Axial = 260.0 kips /bolt
Moment = 126.3 in- kips /bolt
Shear = 134.2 kips /bolt
Required Thickness = 2.39 in. /
PLATE THICKNESS INTERACTION RATIO = 0.955 < 1.0 OK
MIN. Reinforcing WELD SIZE:
Outside= 0.3125 in.
Inside = 0.3125 in.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 11- 19 - 10
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 1, 2014
REGULAR
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ben Andrea, Current Planning & Zoning
Supervisor (Planning Board Rep: Donna Girardot)
CONTACT(S): Ben Andrea; and Chris O'Keefe, Planning /Inspections Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z -933M, 11/14) - Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of AMJB Properties, LLC
to Rezone a 6.89 -Acre Parcel from B -2 Conditional Zoning District to B -2 Conditional Zoning District
to Develop a Self- Storage and Recreational Vehicle and Boat Trailer Storage Facility at 5112 Carolina
Beach Road
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The request is for a major modification of a 6.89 -acre parcel that is a CZD B -2 Conditional Zoning District
to develop a self- storage and recreational vehicle and boat trailer storage facility at 5112 Carolina Beach
Road. A major modifications is treated procedurally the same as a new conditional rezoning. The subject
property is located along the southwest side of the 5100 block of Carolina Beach Road, approximately 0. 65
mile south of the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and South College Road, in an area known as Monkey
Junction.
The property is currently zoned CZD B -2, Highway Business Conditional Zoning District as a result of a
rezoning from R -15 that was approved on July 21, 2014. This conditional rezoning allowed for expansion of
the existing self - storage business onto the subject property. The approval included a site plan consisting of
three 21,000 sq. ft. climate- controlled storage buildings, one covered boat trailer and recreational vehicle
storage area, a building for specialty retail, and related landscaping, drives, and parking areas.
The new proposal eliminates two 21,000 sq. ft. climate controlled self - storage buildings and a 10,000 sq. ft.
specialty retail area and replaces them with a 20,550 sq. ft. climate controlled storage building, two three -
sided, covered recreational vehicle and boat trailer storage areas and one enclosed boat storage area. With the
current proposal, internal traffic circulation is also reconfigured and a driveway to Carolina Beach Road is
eliminated.
The proposal's projected peak hour trip generation does not warrant a full Traffic Impact Analysis; revised
traffic figures have been provided by the applicant and project a decrease in peak hour trips with the current
proposal.
Zoning of the land in the vicinity consists of a mixture of B -2, CZD (B -2), R -15, R -10, and multifamily
zoning (Willoughby Park). Existing land uses in the area consist of a modular home park to the southeast of
the site, residential to the south, and a variety of commercial uses around the Monkey Junction area.
Directly adjacent to the site is Monkey Junction Self Storage; the rezoning request would expand this
existing business onto the subject site.
At their November 6, 2014 meeting, the Planning Board voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the rezoning
request. No one from the public spoke either in favor of or opposed to the proposal.
The subject property is classified as Urban and Conservation Area according to the 2006 CAMA Land Use
Plan.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Attract and retain new and expanding businesses
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends the following motion:
Motion to approve the request, as the Board of Commissioners finds that this request for a zoning map
amendment of 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business, to CZD B -2,
Conditional Zoning District Highway Business as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Urban" land use classification in the 2006 CAMA
Land Use Plan because the "Urban" classification allows for intensive development and
redevelopment of existing urban areas. The subject site is along a major thoroughfare and in an area
of focused urbanization of the county, and best suited for non - residential uses. The rezoning proposal
supports Policy 4.3 of the CAMA Land Use Plan by providing commercial services near the markets
that they serve while not diminishing the quality of life of nearby residential uses.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the character of the area is urbanized and many similar
and compatible uses exist adjacent to and nearby the subject site.
ATTACHMENTS:
Z -933M Script
Z -933M Petition Summary
Z -933M Staff Summary
Z -933M Neighbor Properties Map
Z -933M Zoning -Ortho Map
Z -933M CAMA Map
Z -933M Water -Sewer Map
Applicant Materials Cover
Z -933M Application
Proposed Site Plan Cover
Z -933M Site Plan -Ltr
Z -933 Current Approved Site Plan
Z -933M Authority For Appointment of Agent
Z -933M Community Meeting Report
Z -933M Traffic Impact Worksheet
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Approve as presented by staff.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12
Approved 4 -0.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12
Item # 2
Script for Rezoning (Z -933M) 11 14
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of AMJB Properties, LLC to rezone a 6.9
acre parcel from B -2 Conditional Zoning District to B -2 Conditional Zoning District
to develop a self - storage and recreational vehicle and boat trailer storage facility at
5112 Carolina Beach Road. The subject property is classified as Urban and
Conservation area according to the 2006 CAMA Land Use Plan.
This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any supporters and any opponents of the rezoning will each be allowed 15 minutes total
for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal.
2. Open the Public Hearing:
a. Staff presentation
b. Petitioner's presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Petitioner's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent's cross examination /rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
Close the Public Hearing
4. Commissioner Discussion
If a rezoning is denied a new application may only be submitted within 12 months of the
denial if there is a substantial change in the original petition for rezoning. Do you wish to
proceed or do you wish to continue the matter?
6. Vote on rezoning.
The motion to rezone should include a statement saying how the rezoning is or is not
consistent with the land use plan and why it is reasonable and in the public interest.
Please refer to staffs example motions which are part of your agenda packets.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 1 - 1
Case Z -9331M, (11/14)
Rezone from CZD B -2, Highway Business Conditional Zoning District, to CZD B -2, Highway Business
Conditional Zoning District
Petition Summary Data
Parcel Location & Acreage: 5112 Carolina Beach Road, 6.89 acres
Owner /Petitioner:
Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions, Petitioner, on behalf of AMJB
Properties, LLC, Property Owner
Existing Land Use:
Undeveloped
Zoning History:
Rezoned from R -15, Residential District, to CZD B -2, Highway Business
Conditional Zoning District on July 21, 2014 to allow for retail, RV and
boat trailer storage, and self- storage. Initial zoning applied via Area 4
(April 7, 1971).
Land Classification:
Urban
Water Type:
Public
Sewer Type:
Public
Recreation Area:
Arrowhead Park
Access & Traffic Volume:
Volume recorded in the vicinity of Monkey Junction Self Storage in
August 2013 was 30,262, representing a Level of Service (LOS) of "F ".
Fire District:
New Hanover County South
Watershed & Water Quality
Classification:
Motts Creek (C;Sw)
Conservation /Historic/
Archaeological Resources:
None
Soils and Septic Suitability:
Lynchburg Fine Sandy Loam (Ls) — Severe: Wetness
Johnson Soils (Jo) — Severe: Flooding /Wetness
Seagate Fine Sand (Se) — Severe: Wetness
Stallings Find Sand (St)— Severe: Wetness
Schools:
Williamson Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, Ashley High
Z -933M, 11/14 Page 1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 2 - 1
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT REZONING REQUEST
CASE: Z -933M, 11/14
PETITIONER: Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions, on behalf of AMJB Properties, LLC, property owner
REQUEST: Rezone from CZD B -2, Highway Business Conditional Zoning District, to CZD B -2,
Highway Business Conditional Zoning District for a major modification to a conditional
zoning district (Z -933, 06/14)
ACREAGE: 6.89 acres
LOCATION: 5112 Carolina Beach Road
Parcel ID Number: 7600 - 006 - 058 -000
LAND CLASS: Urban
PLANNING BOARD ACTION:
At their November 6, 2014 meeting, the Planning Board unanimously (6 -0) passed a motion to
recommend approval of the request to rezone 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District
Highway Business, to CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business, finding that the request as
described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Urban" land use classification in the 2006 CAMA
Land Use Plan because the "Urban" classification allows for intensive development and
redevelopment of existing urban areas. The subject site is along a major thoroughfare and in an
area of focused urbanization of the county, and best suited for non - residential uses. The
rezoning proposal supports Policy 4.3 of the CAMA Land Use Plan by providing commercial
services near the markets that they serve while not diminishing the quality of life of nearby
residential uses.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest to rezone 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning
District Highway Business, to CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business because the
character of the area is urbanized and many similar and compatible uses exist adjacent to and
nearby the subject site.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Existing Zoning and Land Uses
The subject property includes approximately 6.89 acres of a 10.1 acre tract located along the southwest
side of the 5100 block of Carolina Beach Road, approximately 0.65 mile south of the intersection of
Carolina Beach Road and South College Road, known as Monkey Junction.
The property is currently zoned CZD B -2, Highway Business Conditional Zoning District as a result of a
rezoning from R -15 that was approved on July 21, 1014. This conditional rezoning allowed for expansion
of the existing self- storage business onto the subject property. The approval included a site plan
consisting of three 21,000 sq. ft. climate - controlled storage buildings, one covered boat trailer and
recreational vehicle storage area, a building for specialty retail, and related landscaping, drives, and
parking areas.
Z -933M, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 3 - 1
Pagel of S
The zoning in the vicinity consists of a mixture of B -2, CZD (B -2), R -15, R -10, and multifamily zoning
(Willoughby Park). Existing land uses in the area consist of a modular home park to the southeast of the
site, residential to the south, and a variety of commercial uses around the Monkey Junction area.
Directly adjacent to the site is Monkey Junction Self Storage; the rezoning request would expand this
existing business onto the subject site.
Existing Site Conditions
The site features 200' of direct frontage along Carolina Beach Road. The site is currently undeveloped
except for a residential structure near the frontage along Carolina Beach Road, and a small accessory
building to the rear of the home. Some areas of wetlands exist on the southwestern portion of the
parcel, but are not in the subject rezoning area nor will they be subject to direct impact due to the
development.
Motts Creek transverses the southwestern portion of the property, outside the area subject to the
rezoning request and proposed development. Some areas of the parcel contain AE and AE Floodway
Special Flood Hazard Areas; however, development encroachment in these areas would be limited to a
portion of the drive terminus and the stormwater management features. No CAMA Areas of
Environmental Concern exist within the subject rezoning or development areas.
Traffic and Transportation
Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff conducted a traffic count in August 2013 in the
vicinity of the project at the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and just north of Antionette Drive. The
count yielded an average daily trip count (ADT) of 30,262. This figure represents an "F" Level of Service
(LOS) meaning that traffic counts are exceeding the design capacity of the road, which is listed at 29,300,
and a Volume to Capacity Ratio of 1.03.
Community Services
Water and Sewer:
The property is within the Urban Services boundary and is within the CFPUA service area. However, the
proposed use should have minimal impact on water and sewer demand.
Fire Protection:
The property is served by New Hanover County Fire Services and located in the New Hanover County
South Fire District.
Schools:
The property is located within the school districts for Williamson Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, and
Ashley High schools. The proposed use should have minimal impact on schools.
Conservation, Historic, and Archaeological Resources
The subject property does not host any known conservation, historic, or archaeological resources.
PETITIONER'S REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking a major modification of the conditional zoning of a 6.89 acre parcel that is a
CZD B -2, Highway Business Conditional Zoning District to develop a self- storage and recreational vehicle
Z -933M, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 3 - 2
Page 2 of S
and boat trailer storage facility at 5112 Carolina Beach Road. The new proposal changes the adopted
conditional zoning district by eliminating two 21,000sf climate controlled self- storage buildings and a
10,000sf specialty retail area and replacing them with a 20,550sf climate controlled storage building,
two three - sided, covered recreational vehicle and boat trailer storage areas and one enclosed boat
storage area. With the current proposal, internal traffic circulation is also reconfigured and a driveway
to Carolina Beach Road is eliminated.
STAFF POSITION:
Zoning Ordinance Considerations
The Ordinance states that the purpose of the B -2 Highway Business district is to provide for the proper
grouping and development of roadside business uses which will best accommodate the needs of the
motoring public and businesses demanding high volume traffic. Principal means of ingress and egress
should be along collector roads, minor arterials, and /or major arterials as designated on the County's
Thoroughfare Classification Plan. Finally, B -2 districts shall be a minimum of five (5) acres in area. Staff
opines the proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the B -2 zoning district, as well as the
district acreage requirements.
The New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance permits both self- storage facilities and recreational vehicle
and RV /boat trailer storage facilities within the B -2 zoning district.
Procedurally, the Zoning Ordinance treats major modifications to conditional zoning districts the same
as a new conditional rezoning.
Traffic
A Traffic Impact Worksheet has been submitted indicating that peak hour trips resulting from the
proposed use (18 peak AM hour trips and 32 peak PM hour trips) are below the threshold that would
require a Traffic Impact Analysis. Additionally, the traffic projections for the revised proposal offer a
reduction in peak hour trips from the previously approved proposal through the elimination of the
10,000sf specialty retail area.
Further, the previous proposal included a new driveway onto Carolina Beach Road, which is also
eliminated with the current proposal. Access will be provided from Archmil Way, which directly
connects to Carolina Beach Road.
Environmental
The project will be subject to several environmental regulations and permits. Stormwater management
will be reviewed by New Hanover County Engineering, along with sediment and erosion control.
Landscaping and Buffering
Landscaping and buffering shall be required per Zoning Ordinance regulations, which include the 20'
wide buffer areas along the perimeter as shown on the site plan, as well as streetscaping along Carolina
Beach Road. The proposed landscaping, buffering, and parking meet the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Land Use Plan Considerations
The majority of the subject area is classified as Urban by the 2006 CAMA Plan. The purpose of this land
use classification is to provide for continued intensive development and redevelopment of existing
Z -933M, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 3 - 3
Page 3 of 5
urban areas. Some of the area at the "rear" of the site is classified as Conservation Area; however, the
project should have minimal to no direct impact to the areas classified as Conservation.
In summary, the proposal is consistent with the Urban land use classification and does not conflict with
any goal or policy within the Land Use Plan.
REVIEW AND ACTION:
This request is being facilitated by Section 55.3 — Conditional Zoning District of the County's Zoning
Ordinance, and has been processed and reviewed per Section 110 — Amending the Ordinance. A
community meeting was held on Thursday, October 9, 2014 in accordance with the requirements for
such a request. No members of the public attended the meeting, and no changes to the proposal were
made as a result of the community meeting.
Staff recommends the approval of the proposal as requested. Although considered a major
modification to the approved Z -933 conditional zoning district, Staff feels that the revised proposal
remains consistent with the previous rezoning and the surrounding community.
Staff concludes that the request is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and also
the 2006 Wilmington -New Hanover County CAMA Land Use Plan. Specifically, the location of the
subject property is very close to a large heavy commercial node, supporting Policy 4.3 of the CAMA Land
Use Plan:
Maximize effectiveness of commercial uses by assuring that land is available for commercial uses
within close proximity to the markets they serve and by ensuring that such commercial uses do
not diminish the quality of life in nearby residential areas.
The southwest area of the subject parcel contains both wetlands and flood hazard areas, both of which
are mostly avoided with the current proposal. The CAMA Land Use Plan offers guidance through Policy
3.9 to discourage development within the flood hazard areas for hazard mitigation:
Carefully control development activities within the 100 -year floodplain (1% annual chance
floodplain) according to density and impervious surface limits to protect the public safety, reduce
the risk of property damage, and provide for the long -term protection and management of these
environmentally significant resources.
The petitioner's proposal offers not only hazard mitigation but would create an undeveloped buffer area
between the existing and proposed development and Motts Creek, a tributary draining to the Cape Fear
River. Policy 3.3 of the CAMA Land Use Plan offers guidance to minimize and offset the effects of
development on the river:
Protect the Cape Fear River from the cumulative impacts of development by carefully reviewing
development plans and enforcing measures to eliminate or mitigate potential impacts from
runoff or discharge of sediment, nutrients, and other pollutants to the river.
Z -933M, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 3 - 4
Page 4 of 5
Arfinn Naarlarl
• Motion to approve the petitioner's proposal (with or without conditions)
• Motion to "table" the item in order to receive more information
• Motion to deny the petitioner's request based on specific reasons
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to approve the request, as the Board of Commissioners finds that this request for a zoning map
amendment of 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business, to CZD B -2,
Conditional Zoning District Highway Business as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Urban" land use classification in the 2006 CAMA
Land Use Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment
is consistentl.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public
health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or balancing
benefits and detriments. 1.
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to deny the request, as the Board of Commissioners finds that this request for a zoning map
amendment of 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business, to CZD B -2,
Conditional Zoning District Highway Business as described is:
1. Not Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Urban" land use classification in the 2006
CAMA Land Use Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the
amendment is not consistent/.
2. Not reasonable or in the public interest because [Briefly explain why not. Factors may include
public health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, ar
balancing benefits and detriments./.
Staff - Suggested Motion:
Motion to approve the request, as the Board of Commissioners finds that this request for a zoning map
amendment of 6.89 acres from CZD B -2, Conditional Zoning District Highway Business, to CZD B -2,
Conditional Zoning District Highway Business as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the "Urban" land use classification in the 2006 CAMA
Land Use Plan because the "Urban" classification allows for intensive development and
redevelopment of existing urban areas. The subject site is along a major thoroughfare and in an
area of focused urbanization of the county, and best suited for non - residential uses. The
rezoning proposal supports Policy 4.3 of the CAMA Land Use Plan by providing commercial
services near the markets that they serve while not diminishing the quality of life of nearby
residential uses.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the character of the area is urbanized and many
similar and compatible uses exist adjacent to and nearby the subject site.
Z -933M, (11/14)
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 3 - 5
Page 5 of 5
O
N
d
N A \
U
N y
m 0
O
y p m
N ca
N G d
O
N
Z 0 m
OI 0 O QO
c
5
i
v
c
O
-p M
M N
MO E
O
7
O
U
C
O
M
ci O
_ N
K a 0 cI
N
� M
v C?
N
-00
�O
c v LO
°5 v mm
u O M R o
N y
Q
U w V1
D 04
D
LO a.
4Nt� CAROLINA
z
0
���CNVI -7 M3c�
=Q= W
'¢ z z 0? Q w z 0 w z z z 3 F w z
o o twwza 0 01Ea°kkkk°r1E0r0 a° °r °� U
0
a
c.
<u a° a
Azz z z z azzaQO �zw zzz
a 0Uzzuz0zu<<<R�a�� as w��� -u � �
��� ���� w� ��
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0¢ o 1 s o o s -¢ l 0 o
0 S M f
V r
a
o.
Z
mv2
w / f
Z
O
2
LL
d v
O
O
O
d �
7 N
do N
i
Q,0 �Py M
a
d
6.
7,
M \Cl)
i CP
N M
A �n
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 4 - 1
cO
d
�dv W
° N
�L
a
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12-5-1
O �
N � H
` F
4 A k g
U to
p / o o
y o
a c
g ` A w
v
E A
o n E
U z �j 7 H U K
k
d
d �
7
Q A o
U
d0
N ca
O C N O 6
Z G m a =
O Of QO
c c rn \ Pg�PC� 1
b6 \
o
i
O
J
f a.
10 N
M0 E
3 E
� o• N�
O
U '7, �o
m -01
N _ --
N �7
M
M M
v
N
a
-0°0 3
c u 00
.. w 0 iii R O
O :. �^ m cO o
G
u d M L C G
N
p d
ina ZJ s
U—£ LINA a J v+
�0
t
ON
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12-6-1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12-7-1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 8 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS
DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
230 Government Center Drive
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
910 - 798 -7155 phone
910- 798 -7053 fax
www.nhegov.com
Petitioner Information
Property Owner(s)
Subject Property
If different than Petitioner
Name
Owner Name
Address
Cindee Wolf
AMJB Properties, LLC
5112 Carolina Beach Rd
Company
Owner Name 2
Parcel ID
Design Solutions
Trey McGirt (Prof Mgr)
313409.25.2628
Address
Address
Area
P.O. Box 7221
2000 Ivydale Lane
6.9 Ac. +l-
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Existing Zoning and Use
Wilmington, NO 28406
Wilmington, NC 28405
i
Phone
Phone
Proposed Zoning and Use
910- 620 -2374
910- 612 -6762
B -2 (CZD) Mini - storage
Email
Email
Land Classification
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
treymcg @ bellsouth.net
Urban
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
PLEASE READ ALL OF SECTION 59.10 OF THE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING
YOUR APPLICATION!
Petitions must be reviewed by Planning & Zoning for completeness prior to acceptance. For petitions involving five (5) acres or
less, a fee of $400 .00 will be charged; for those of greater than five (5) acres a fee of $600,0 will be charged. This fee, payable
to New Hanover County, MUST accompany this petition. $500-00 / $700.00
In addition to the attached site plan check list, the following supplemental information is required:
1. Copy of the New Hanover County Tax Map, which delineates the property requested for rezoning.
2. Legal description (by metes and bounds) of property requested for rezoning.
3. Copy of the subdivision map or recorded plat which delineates the property.
4. Site Plan as outlined in section 59.10 -3. For plans larger than 1 Ix17, please provide ten (10) copies for the Planning
Board meeting. You will be asked for an additional thirteen (13) copies of your site plan if your proposal moves
forward to the County Commissioners. Also, please include one (1) reduced copy of the site plan. Digital submission
may be substituted when accurate scaling can be assured.
5. Authority for Appointment of Agent form (if applicable). The owner or authorized agent is required to attend the
Planning Board meeting. The owner or an attorney is required to attend the County Commissioners meeting.
6. Requirements of Section 59.10 -2.
7. Applicant's answers to the questions on this application.
8. Signed site plan check list.
9. A report of the required public information meeting outlined in Section 111 -2.1.
REVIEW PROCEDURES
Petitions for conditional change of zoning are first referred to the New Hanover County Planning Board and then acted
upon by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners.
Complete petitions and all supplementary information must be accepted by Planning & Zoning twenty (20) working
days before the Planning Board meeting to allow adequate time for processing and advertisement as required by the North
Carolina General Statutes.
Page 1 of 3
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 9 - 1
05/12
2'fl\
J
Planning Board meetings are held at 5:30PM in the Commissioner's Assembly Room in the Old County Courthouse, at
Third and Princess Streets, Wilmington, North Carolina, on the first Thursday of each month.
If the Planning Board approves your petition, the request will automatically be referred to the Board of County
Commissioners. if your petition is denied, you may appeal to the Board of Commissioners. Planning & Zoning can advise you
regarding appeal procedures.
Uses and Development Requirements: Within a Conditional District, the Permit may specify additional conditions and
requirements which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use
District regulations, or other limitations on land which may be regulated by state law or local ordinance. Such conditions and
requirements shall not specify ownership status, race, religion, character or other exclusionary characteristic of occupant, shall be
objective, specific and detailed to the extent necessary to accomplish their purpose, and shall relate rationally to making the
Permit compatible with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan, and other pertinent requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and
to securing the public health, safety, morals, and welfare.
WHAT YOU MUST ESTABLISH
FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING
Conditional District Zoning is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New
Hanover County Land Use Plan and the objectives of this ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed for the
project. You must explain in the space below how your request satisfies each of the following requirements: (attach additional
sheets if necessary)
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's Policies for Growth and Development?
Policies for growth encourage continued efforts to attract and retain businesses. The proposal
is essentially to expand an existing successful business with a small portion of specialty retail
area and additional storage space. The business is located on a busy traffic corridor.
2. How would the requested zone change be consistent with the property's classification on the Land Classification
Map?
The site is located in an "Urban" CAMA land classification. These areas are intended for
intensive urban development. They are appropriate for medium- density uses when direct
access can be provided to major traffic corridors and public services are available.
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or bow is the land
involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
Carolina Beach Road continues to develop with commercial and higher - density uses and the Monkey
Junction intersection has become a major commercial node in the County, serving the many
residential neighborhoods one - tier - removed from the busy highway thoroughfares. Smaller lots and
smaller homes have led to storage facilities being successful because of an established need.
4. List proposed conditions and restrictions that would mitigate the impacts of the proposed use(s).
Zoning Ordinance requirements, including buffering and directional light control, will be applied.
Landscape requirements addressing the streetscape and interior aesthetics will also serve to
mitigate impacts on adjacent properties. Permits for driveway access, stormwater management,
etc. will be required before actual development, assuring compliance to all rules and regulations.
Page 2 of 3
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 9 - 2
45112
SITE PLAN CHECKLIST section 59.10 -3)
Check each item to confirm that is included. The application will not be deemed complete without all items
being addressed.
X Tract boundaries and total area, plus location of adjoining land parcels and roadways.
X Existing zoning of the tract and neighboring parcels and proposed tract zoning.
7C Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type
of units and site plan outlining area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided lot boundaries. For non-
residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will
occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used.
,j'�) P\ Development schedule including proposed phasing.
)C Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of- -way
dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets and location,
arrangement and access provision for parking areas,
)C All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage.
X The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable
Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 67 of the Zoning Ordinance.
X Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract
than the corresponding General Use District regulations, which are the minimum requirements in the Conditional Use
District, or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance.
X Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change (Ref. Article VII, as applicable).
By my signature below, I certify that I have read Section 59.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. I understand
and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional District zoning for which I am
applying. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that i have
the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I further understand the singling out
of one parcel of land for special zoning treatment unrelated to County policies and the surrounding
neighborhood would probably be illegal. I certify that this application is complete and that all information
presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
A&PL-71V.' , �Z� 14
Signature of Petitioner and /or Property Owner
Page 3 of 3
Archie McGirt
Print Name
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 9 - 3
O5/12
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 10 - 1
b `
o'
�O
m�
z
g
�a
a, ygao �em�
,..��
Z �\tid Ida
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014/ IN �
m ITEM: 12- 11 - 1 "
CURRENT
APPROVED
PLAN
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 12 - 1
f� �'f
J
rl,/
J'
' r ,
r r 6J • J'r r
r r �.
�S
z�
rrJ
o
CL
p
AI$y a w -
0
Xmk
Nil,
�s 18i
` Y
\ -; !i
Nim
"Ilk V
IiM
\ f: M
tL
d tt \ IT ,,,
Hit
z• \ \ ti
It'
f
.a
,
\
1`
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS
A UTMORITY FOR
APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
Print Form
230 Government Center Drive
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
910- 798 -7165 phone
910 - 798 -7053 fax
www.nhegov.com
Please note that for quasi- judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case
at the public hearing.
The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent
for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or
an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby
authorized to, on behalf of the property owner:
1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials
2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner
3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or
indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning
Ordinance.
Agent Information
Property Owner(s)
Subject Property
Name
Owner Name
Address
Cindee Wolf
AMIJB Properties, LLC
5112 Carolina Beach Road
Company
Owner Name 2
City, State, Zip
Design Solutions
Archie McGirt (Manager)
Wilmington
Address
Address
Parcel ID
P.O. Box 7221
2000 Ivydale Lane
31 3409.25.2628
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Wilmington, NC 28406
Wilmington, NC 28405
etp 7(eot3-OOto^ o58 -OOp
Phone
Phone
910- 620 -2374
910- 791 -1150
Email
Email
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
reymcg @bellsouth.net (Trey McGirt)
Case Number Reference:
Date/Time received:
Received by:
This document was willfully executed on the
Owner 1 Signature
G -5A day of
0CAO�,wr
Owner 2 Signature
, 20.
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 13 - 1 04114
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY
NEW HANOVER ZONING ORDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Property Address: 5112 Carolina Beach Road
Proposed Zoning: Modification of existing B -2 (CZD ) site plan for use as a commercial
mini - storage facility 1 Previous Case # Z -933, 6114 (Approved 07/21/14
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning
application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class
mail on (date) September 30, 2014 . A copy of the written notice is attached along with the
plan and exhibits that were mailed with the letters, and then presented at the meeting.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: 5044 Carolina Beach Rd. 5:30 -6:30
P.m., Wednesday, October 8th.
The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Ref. attached list.
The following issues were discussed at the meeting: The meeting was to be handled in an
open -house format, but no one from the public attended.
As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: None
Date: October 9_2014
Applicant: Design Solutions 1 Cindee Wolf
By:.-
Community Information Meeting Wednesday
MJ Storage Expansion - Site Plan Modification October 8, 2014
Name
Address
Email (Optional)
•� Mc C. r �-
r�4� M5 �,
�P! r^r @. 'IcPA o\�Ai , Y1
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 14 - 2
Name
Address
city
State Zip
Property Address
TaxParcel ID
PID
Willoughby Park Condo Assoc.
1430 Commonwealth Or
Wilmington
NC
28403
1601 Willoughby Park Ct
313410.37.2493
7100- 007 -001 -000
Palay Investments LLC
6123 Lydden Rd
Wilmington
NC
28409
5111 Carolina Beach Rd
313410.26.9421
7100 -003 -067 -000
John & Linda Thompson etal
1877 Kings Landing Rd
Hampstead
NC
28443
5119 Carolina Beach Rd
313410.36.3581
7100 -003- 033 -000
Salvatrice Weaver Firs
5123 Carolina Beach Rd
Wilmington
NC
28412
5123 Carolina Beach Rd
313410.36.3367
7100-003- 034 -000
WalMart Property Tax Dept
P.O. Box 8050
Bentonville
AR
72712
5135 Carolina Beach Rd
31341035,8966
7600 -001 -001 -000
Royal Palms MHP, LLC
642 Kreag Rd
Pittsford
NY
14534
5140 Carolina Beach Rd
31341425.5478
7600- 006 -056 -OCO
Cape Fear Utilites, Inc
PO Box 1810
Wilmington
NC
28402
5132 Carolina Beach Rd
313413,14.6531
7500 -006- 054 -COO
Lloyd Bowden, Jr.
849 Shinn Point Rd
Wilmington
NC
28409
5120 Carolina Beach Rd
313409.25.3545
7600- 006 -057 -000
Gail Lee McGirt
1101 McGirt Place
Wilmington
INC
28412
1101 McGirt PI
313409.15.1007
7600 -006 -062 -000
Gail Lee McGir1
1101 McGill Place
Wilmington
INC
28412
1123 McGirt PI
313409.15.3253
7600- 006 -063 -000
Gail Lee McGirt
1101 McGirt Place
Wilmington
NC
28412
1 13 1 McGirt PI
313409.15 7645
7600 - 006 -059 -000
Mildred McGirt
1143 McGirt Place
Wilmington
NC
28412
1143 McGirt PI
313409 15.9765
7600- 006 -069 -000
Al Properties, LLC
2000 Ivydale Lane
Wilmington
NC
28405
5050 Carolina Beach Rd
313409.15.7986
7600- 006- 064 -000
Gloria Fullwood
424 Motts Creek Rd
Wilmington
NC
26412
424 Motts Creek Rd
313409.05.9274
7600 -006- 066 -000
Archmil Place HOA, Inc
PO Box 685
Wrightsville Beach
NC
28480
1101 Beamon Ln
313409.15.0789
7100 -001 -043 -000
Ross Larson
2234 Washington St
Lemon Grove
CA
91945
1202 Beamon Ln
313409.153862
7100-001-044-000
Alice Weiser
1204 Beaman Lane
Wilmington
NC
28412
1204 Beaman Ln
313409.15,4806
7100 -D01- 045 -O0D
Brett Waress
613 Barksdalle Road
Wilmington
INC
28409
1206 Beamon Ln
313409 15.48310
7100- 001 -046 -000
Dean Morris
1208 Bamon Lane
Wilmington
NC
28412
1208 Beamon Ln
313409.15.4952
71OD -001 -047 -000
Jane Marie Parker
1210 Beamon Lane
Wilmington
NC
28412
1210 Beamon Ln
313409.15.5905
71OD -001- 048 -000
Jenna Drescher
1212 Beamon Lane
Wilmington
NC
26412
1212 Beamon Ln
313409.16.5938
7100 - 001 -049 -000
Barry & Susan Long
7925 Vandemere Ct
Raleigh
NC
27615
1214 Beaman Ln
313409.16.5071
7100 -001- 050 -000
Christopher & Robin Creech
1216 Beamon Lane
Wilmington
NC
28412
1216 Beamon Ln
313409.15.6004
7100- 401- D51 -00o
Susan Gardner
1218 Beamon Lane
Wilmington
NC
28412
1218 Beamon Ln
313709.16 6046
7100 - 001052 -000
Shirley Fischer
1220 Beamon Lane
Wilmington
INC
28412
1220 Beamon Ln
313409 ,16.6079
71OD -001- 053 -000
Debra Lewis
1222 Beamon Lane
Wlmingion
NC
28412
1222 Beamon Ln
313409.16.7112
7100 -001- 054 -000
Joshua Laker
5006 Robinette Rd
Wilmington
NC
28412
1224 Beamon Ln
313409.16.7145
7100- 001 -055 -000
Jan Crews
1530 Attanook Or
Winston -Salem
NC
27106
1226 Beamon Ln
313409.16.7188
7100 -001 -056 -000
Monkey Junction Mini - Storage
2000 Ivydale Lane
Wilmington
NC
26405
5004 Carolina Beach Rd
313409.25.2505
7100 - 001 -002 -000
Al Properties, LLC
2000 Ivydale Lane
Wilmington
NC
28405
5045 Carolina Beach Rd
313409.26.5325
7100 - 001 -060 -000
Monkey Junction Car Wash LLC
5044 Carolina Beach Rd
Wilmington
NC
28412
5042 Carolina Beach Rd
31340916 3605
7100 -001- 061 -000
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 14 - 4
LU LU
Q
4-1
V1
%)
ti
O
00
O (N
Z
V) M
ai C
0
bo
CM E
M
CO �D
�t
FT%i
"64
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 14 - 5
sa
Ln
1A
yj
4:3 1-4
Lil
< LA
-4 —1
I-,
�t
FT%i
"64
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 14 - 5
Oesign Solutiop
September 30, 2014
To: Adjacent Property Owners
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: MJ Storage Expansion
A proposal for expansion of the Monkey Junction Self Storage facility onto the adjacent tract was
approved by the Board of Commissioners on July 21, 2014. A copy of the site plan is attached,
labelled "Old Plan."
The developers have researched market trends and determined that they need to revise their
business model somewhat. In response to that, minor changes have been made to the site plan,
also attached and labelled "New Plan," as follows:
• The specialty retail building and associated parking at the Carolina Beach Road frontage
has been eliminated, and replaced by climate - controlled storage.
• The rear two (2) previously proposed climate- control storage buildings have been
replaced by a structure designed for boat trailer and RV covered storage.
Positive justifications to these changes include:
• The driveway onto Carolina Beach Road has been eliminated.
• The retail use would have had a greater trip generation than the storage use, thereby
reducing overall traffic volume on Carolina Beach Road.
• The large paved turnaround at the rear of the site has been eliminated. Vehicle
circulation will be directional around the rear building. As such, the coverage area has
been reduced — further away from the special flood hazard area.
• The total impervious surfaces area remains the same as on the previously approved
plan.
• No other changes to the conditions of approval are proposed. The architecture,
landscaping and overall aesthetics of the existing business will be duplicated in the
expansion.
The County has determined that these changes represent enough of a modification to require re-
approval of the Conditional Zoning District by the Board of Commissioners. That process requires
that the developer hold another meeting for all property owners within a 500 -foot perimeter of the
tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an
opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project
improvements, benefits and impacts.
This meeting is going to be held at the Monkey Junction Storage office, 5044 Carolina Beach Road,
at 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, October 8th. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me
at telephone # 620 -2374, or email cwolf @lobodemar.biz with comments and /or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to continue being a good neighbor and
an asset to the community.
P.D. BOX 7222, Wi(miwgtovL, NC 28406 * Tefephone: 1120 - 620 -2374 * Emaif: cwolf @tobodemar.biz
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 14 - 6
ITEM: 12- 14 - 7
Traffic Impact Worksheet
Prior to submission of nonresidential site plan, this worksheet must be prepared A
Traffic Impact Analysis will be required for all projects generating 100 peak hour trips
or more. The scope of the TIA shall be determined by concurrence of the Planning
Director, the MPO coordinator and NCDOT traffic engineer. Any mitigation measures
required must be included in the final site Plan submitted for review.
PROJECT NAME M7 Storage Expansion Plan Modification
PROJECT ADDRESS 5112 Carolina Beach Road
DEVELOPER/OWNER AMJB Properties, L.L.C.
EXISTING ZONING CD/B -2 (Case Z-933,6/14)
GROSS FLOOR AREA 122,578
NEAREST INTERSECTION CBch Road & Archmil Way
BEFORE PROPOSED PROJECT
Average Daily Traffic (Date)
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
30,262
,,.R,
sq. ft.
ITE MANUAL TRAFFIC GENERATION ESTIMATE:
*ITE Manual available at Planning Department
USE AND VARIABLES: (ITE 151) Mina- Warehouse
(Example: Racquet Club; S courts; Saturday peaks)
AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 18 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 32
(Traffic generation of 200 peak hour trips will require Traffic Impact Analysis Scoping
meeting with Planning Department)
Cindee Wolf from ITE Manual
Person Providing Estimate
Signature
Peak Hour estimate confirmed by Planning & Zoning on J"a t`t
(Date)
BYV
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 15 - 1
MJ Storage Expansion
Modified Conditional Zoning District Petition
Traffic Impact Calculations
Reference:
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation Rates (8th Edition)
Existing Approved Development:
10,000 s.f. Specialty Retail - ITE (814) [trips /1000 s.f. GFA]
Avg Rate Total Trips
Weekday Average 44.32 443
A.M. Peak 6.84 68
P.M. Peak 2.71 27
98,500 s.f. Mini - Warehouse - ITE (151) [trips /1000 s.f. GFA]
Avg. Rate Total Trips
Weekday Average 2.50 246
A.M. Peak 0.15 15
P.M. Peak 0.26 26
Combined A.M. Peak = 83 / Combined P.M. Peak = 53
Modified Development:
122,578 s.f. Mini - Warehouse - ITE (151) [trips /1000 s.f. GFA]
Avg. Rate Total Trips
Weekday Average 2.50 306
A.M. Peak 0.15 18
P.M. Peak 0.26 32
** Overall trip generation has been decreased. Trips during either peak hour are < 100
/ No TIA requirement. **
Board of Commissioners - December 1, 2014
ITEM: 12- 15 - 2