HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-632 Wetland and Protected Species Assessment Report
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
115 MacKenan Drive | Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 | f: 919.467.6008 | www.withersravenel.com | License No. C-0832
Cary | Greensboro | Pittsboro | Raleigh | Wilmington
July 27, 2016
Mr. Brian Gurganus
ST Wooten Corporation, Inc.
PO Box 2408
Wilson, NC 27894
Re: Wetland and Protected Species Assessment Report
Sutton Lake Mine Expansion Site (±80.43 acres)
Wilmington, New Hanover County, NC
WR Project # 02050449.20
Mr. Gurganus:
On July 20 & 21, 2016, WithersRavenel conducted a review of the ±80.43 acre property proposed
for expansion of the existing mine for the purpose evaluating the presence of wetlands, and
streams, as well as federal and state listed threatened and endangered species. The review area
consisted of the ±80.43 acre westernmost portion of the 1,045 acre parcel (PID: R02400-001-001-
000) owned by Invista S.A.R.L., as depicted in the attached exhibits. The review area is located on
US 421, directly west of the existing Invista facility in Wilmington, New Hanover County at
Latitude: 34.309732; Longitude: -77.987537. Specifically, the review area is bound to the east by
the CRX railroad track, to the west by the Duke Energy – Sutton Plant property, to the south by an
existing sand mine, and to the north by a high voltage power line easement. The review area is
located within two sub-basins of the Cape Fear River Basin (see attached Cape Fear Basin Exhibit).
The majority of the review area drains to the NE Cape Fear River (HUC: 03030007; Stream Index:
18-74-(52.5); Water Quality Classification: C;Sw). A small area in central, western portion of the
review area drains to the Cape Fear River (HUC: 03030005; Stream Index: 18-(71); Water Quality
Classification: SC).
Before conducting the site visit, a preliminary assessment was completed by compiling topographic
base maps, New Hanover County soils maps, color aerial photographs and USGS Quadrangle Maps.
Proposed Activities
The review area is located within a heavily developed area along the US 421 corridor where most
of the industrial development is concentrated within New Hanover County. The areas south of the
review area are heavily developed, and very little natural habitat exists to the south of the review
area. The natural habitat that does exist to the south is severely fragmented with very few
unimpeded travel corridors for wildlife.
The proposed activities within the review area consist of the proposed expansion of the existing
sand mine, located adjacent to the south. Due to the nature of a mining operation, the proposed
activities will result in impact to the entire review area.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 2 of 16
Site Conditions
The review area consisted of undeveloped woodlands, maintained roads and a maintained
overhead power line easement. The review was characterized by two main communities, consisting
of longleaf pine-turkey oak forest, and maintained corridors (roads and overhead power line
easement)(See Vegetative Communities Exhibit).
The maintenance associated with the maintained corridors prevents a canopy or significant
understory/shrub strata. The vegetative composition of the maintained corridors consisted of a
mixture of camphorweed (Heterotheca subaxillaris), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scopariu,) longleaf pine (seed stage) (Pinus
palustris), sandhills beaksedge (Rhynchospora megalocarpa), centipede grass (Eremochloa
ophiuroides), Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), lespedeza (Sericea
lespedeza), bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) and reindeer lichen (Cladonia spp.), as well as other
common weeds and grasses.
The longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was characterized by a canopy of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris),
the vast majority of which are less than 50 years old with only scattered mature longleaf pines, and
an understory of immature longleaf pine and turkey oak (Quercus laevis). Due to a lack of natural
fire patterns, the longleaf pine/turkey oak forest has lost many of the characteristics of the historic
xeric longleaf pine scrub natural community. The understory within the majority of the review area
was dense, with some areas of sparse understory and only a few areas of barren sand. With the
exception of the barren sand areas, the leaf litter ranged from 3-6 inches thick.
In the areas of dense understory, the vegetative composition of the herbaceous strata consisted of
little blue stem and sandhills beaksedge. In areas where the understory was sparse, the herbaceous
strata consisted of a mixture of wiregrass (Aristida stricta), sandhills beaksedge, little bluestem,
Carolina October-flower (Polygonella polygama var. croomii) and reindeer lichen. The vegetative
composition of the barren sand areas consisted sparse wire grass, Carolina October-flower,
sandhills beaksedge and reindeer lichen.
Wetland Delineation
Prior to conducting the site visit, WR reviewed aerial photographs, the USFWS National Wetland
Inventory maps, the USDA Soil Survey for New Hanover County (1977), the 2013 USGS
Quadrangle Map (Castle Hayne Quad) and New Hanover County GIS data (i.e. topography, streams,
etc.). WR surveyed the review area for the presence of wetlands, streams and surface waters
jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers (Corps) and/or NC Division of Water Resources (DWR). WR
conducted surveys for features meeting the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual and 2010
Atlantic & Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement.
The New Hanover County Soil Survey characterizes the majority of the soils within the review area
as Kureb sand (Kr), with three pockets of Rimini sand (Rm) and one pocket of Leon sand (Le). Both
Kureb and Rimini soils are excessively drained upland soils. Leon soils are poorly drained soils.
The survey did not identify any wetlands or surface waters within the review area. The majority of
the review area consists of xeric longleaf pine/turkey oak sand ridge. The review of the mapped
area of Leon sand in the southeastern corner of the review determined that the soils were
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 3 of 16
consistent with Leon Sand. However, there were no hydrologic indicators within the upper 12” of
the soil surface, and the area did not contain a dominance of wetland vegetation.
Additionally, three small low lying areas, less than 0.10 acres each, were identified within the site
and intense investigation was conducted within these area. Two of the low lying areas are located
immediately north of the central access road, and one was located immediately east of the western
property boundary within the maintained power line easement. The vegetation in these areas was
considered hydrophytic based on the Dominance Test in the Atlantic & Gulf Coastal Plain Regional
Supplement. However, the soils in these areas were not hydric, and did not have sufficient
hydrologic indicators in the upper 12 inches of the soil surface to meet wetland criteria. Therefore,
these areas are not wetlands, and are simply low lying areas within an upland landscape that hold
water periodically during heavy rain events, with no surface water connection to jurisdictional
waters.
This report represents the professional opinion of our Senior Environmental Scientist and does not
represent concurrence by the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Threatened & Endangered Species Review
Methodology
Per conversations with New Hanover County Development Services, the review for threatened,
endangered and rare species consisted of the following:
• Federally listed threatened and endangered species for New Hanover County;
• Federally listed Federal Species of Concern (FSC) identified as occurring within the New
Hanover County portion of the “421 Sand Ridge Significant Nature Heritage Area”, as
documented in the Natural Area Inventory of New Hanover County (2003), prepared by the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program;
• State listed threatened, endangered and rare species identified as occurring within the New
Hanover County portion of the “421 Sand Ridge Significant Nature Heritage Area”, as
documented in the Natural Area Inventory of New Hanover County (2003), prepared by the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program;
Prior to conducting the site visit, WR reviewed US Fish and Wildlife Service’s online threatened and
endangered species database, located at:
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/New Hanover.html and the NC Wildlife Resource
Commission’s “State and Federally Listed Endangered Wildlife Species of North Carolina”
publication, located at www.ncwildlife.org, to identify federal and state listed species known to
occur in New Hanover County, North Carolina.
WR also reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program’s (NCNHP) online database, located at
http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search to identify known occurrences of federal and
state listed threatened or endangered species known to occur in New Hanover County. WR
submitted a project review request to the NCNHP through their Data Explorer webpage, located
at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, to identify known occurrence of listed species within 1.0 miles
of the subject property. WR also obtained NCNHP GIS data for all known occurrences of listed
species within 2.0 miles of the review area.
On July 21, 2016, WR conducted a pedestrian survey of the subject property to assess vegetative
communities and identify potential habitat for, or occurrences of the federal and state listed species
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 4 of 16
as requested by New Hanover County Development Services. The vegetative communities found
within the subject property consists of maintained corridors and longleaf pine/turkey oak forest as
previously discussed in the Site Conditions section of this report.
Species synopsis and Pedestrian Survey Results
Plants and animals classified as Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) by the USFWS are protected
under the provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
Additionally, plants and animals classified as Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) by the State of the
North Carolina are protected under provisions of 15A NCAC 10I.0101 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code. There is no protection afforded to species classified as Federal Species of
Concern (FSC) by FWS or classified as Special Concern (SC) or Watch List (W) by the State.
The following tables present the species for which surveys were conducted. Federally listed species
surveyed for are based on the USFWS for New Hanover County, North Carolina, as last updated on
04/02/15. Please note that marine species and species which only occur on the barrier islands or
immediately on the beaches have been omitted from this report due to a lack of suitable habitat
within the review area (i.e. seabeach amaranth, shortnose sturgeon, Atlantic sturgeon, West Indian
manatee, piping plover, red knot and sea turtles.
State listed species listed in the following tables are based on the New Hanover County
Development Services request to survey for species identified as occurring within the New
Hanover County portion of the “421 Sand Ridge Significant Nature Heritage Area”, as documented
in the Natural Area Inventory of New Hanover County (2003), prepared by the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program. Therefore, Venus flytrap and Carolina goldenrod were omitted from this report;
however, it should be noted that potential habitat for these species does not occur within the
review area.
Common Name Scientific Name Federal
Status
State
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Animals
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis T (S/A) T No No Effect
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA T No No Effect
Coachwhip Masticophis flagellum None None Yes No Effect
Eastern Fox
Squirrel Sciurus niger None None Yes No Effect
Northern Long-
Eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis T T Yes
May Affect,
Not Likely to
Adversely
Affect
Red-cockaded
Woodpecker Picoides borealis E E No No Effect
Southern Hognose
Snake Heterodon simus FSC SC Yes
May Affect,
Not Likely to
Adversely
Affect
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 5 of 16
Common Name Scientific Name Federal
Status
State
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Plants
Cooley’s
Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi E E No No Effect
Florida Scrub
Frostweed Helianthemum nashii None E Yes No Effect
Golden Sedge Carex lutea E E No No Effect
Lace-Lip Ladies’
Tresses Spiranthes laciniata None SC-V No No Effect
Pickering’s
Dawnflower
Stylisma pickeringii var.
pickeringii FSC SC-V Yes No Effect
Robbin’s Spikerush Eleocharis robbinsii None SC-V No No Effect
Rough-Leaved
Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia E E No No Effect
Sandhills Milkvetch Astragalus michauxii FSC SC-V Yes No Effect
Shrubby Seedbox Ludwigia suffruticosa None T No No Effect
Viviparous
Spikerush Eleocharis vivipara None E No No Effect
West Indies
Meadow-Beauty Rhexia cubensis None W1 No No Effect
BGPA = Bald & Golden Eagle Protection Act SC = Special Concern
T (S/A) = Threatened by similarity of appearance SC-V = Special Concern-Vulnerable
T = Threatened W1 = Watch List
E = Endangered
FSC = Federal Species of Concern
Animals
American Alligator
FWS Status – T(S/A)
State Status – T
The American alligator is a large, semi-aquatic, armored reptile that ranges in size from 6 to 14 feet
long. Alligators live in swampy areas, rivers, streams, lakes and ponds. There is no critical habitat
designated for the American alligator.
There was no potential habitat for the American alligator observed within the review area. Based
on a lack of potential habitat, WR concludes that the proposed activities will have No Effect on the
American alligator.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 6 of 16
Bald Eagle
FWS Status – BGPA
State Status - T
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open
water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 miles of
open water.
There were no trees found within or adjacent to the review area that were considered suitable
nesting habitat as there were no large pine trees observed with adequate limb structure and
unobstructed ingress/egress. No bald eagles or their nests were observed during the pedestrian
survey of the review area. A review of the NCNHP data did not identify any known eagle nesting or
roosting sites within 2.0 miles of the review area.
Sutton Lake and the Cape Fear River are located within 1.0 miles of the review area and are
considered potential foraging habitat. In accordance with the USFWS’ “National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines (May 2007), a pedestrian survey was conducted for area within 660 ft of
the review area for bald eagle nests as depicted in the Bald Eagle Nest Survey Exhibit. The 660 ft
review area was created in ArcGIS and downloaded into a Trimble mapping grade GPS unit in order
to locate the limits of the survey area in the field. There was no potential nesting habitat within the
survey area to the west of the review area as there were no mature trees present. The area to the
south is no longer forested, as this is an active sand mine. The survey of the forested areas to the
east did not identify any nests.
Per the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines, activities taking place in excess of 660 ft from
a bald eagle nest will have no effect on nesting activities. Therefore, based on a lack of existing nests
within 660 ft of the review area and lack of nearby records, WR concludes that the proposed
activities will have No Effect on bald eagles.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Coachwhip
FWS Status – None
State Status - None
Coachwhips are long, slender snakes that can grow to over 8 feet in length. Their coloration is very
distinctive, fading gradually from black on the head to tan or nearly white on the tail. The pattern
of the scales on the rail resemble a braided whip. Habitat consists of open areas with sandy soils
associated with sandhill scrub habitats, coastal dunes and old fields. Coachwhips live underground
and hunt during the daytime, and are most commonly seen in hot weather.
It should be noted that the coachwhip is not classified by the USFWS or State as threatened,
endangered or species of special concern. Therefore, this species is not imperiled or protected.
The onsite longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was determined to be potential habitat for the
coachwhip. No individuals were observed during the pedestrian survey. Additionally, based on the
NCNHP GIS data, there are no know occurrences of the coachwhip within 2.0 miles of the review
area.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 7 of 16
The proposed activities within the review area will result in the removal of habitat for the
coachwhip. Very little potential habitat exists to the south of the review area, as this area has been
heavily developed. There is existing habitat within the Duke Energy property to the west that will
continue to serve as a travel corridor.
While potential habitat does exist within the review area, the coachwhip is not considered “rare” by
either the USFWS or State of North Carolina. Therefore, species populations remain sufficiently
stable that loss of habitat does not threaten the continued existence of the species. Therefore, WR
concludes that the proposed activities will have No Effect on the coachwhip.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Eastern Fox Squirrel
FWS Status – None
State Status - None
The eastern fox squirrel is the largest tree squirrel, growing up to 15 inches in length. Eastern fox
squirrels exhibit a variety of color phases and patterns ranging from gray to black to red. Habitat
consists primarily of mature longleaf pine and open pine-oak forests in the Sandhills and southern
Coastal Plain.
It should be noted that the eastern fox squirrel is not classified by the USFWS or State as
threatened, endangered or species of special concern. Therefore, this species is not imperiled or
protected. The NC Wildlife Resource Commission has established hunting seasons for the eastern
fox squirrel, which is from October 12 – December 31.
The onsite longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was considered potential habitat for the eastern fox
squirrel. While two gray squirrels were observed during the pedestrian survey, no eastern fox
squirrels were observed, nor were their nests. Based on the pedestrian survey, only marginal
habitat exists within the review area.
While marginal habitat does exist within the review area, the eastern fox squirrel is not considered
“rare” by either the USFWS or State of North Carolina. Species populations remain sufficiently
stable that loss of habitat does not threaten the continued existence of the species. Therefore, WR
concludes that the proposed activities will have No Effect on the eastern fox squirrel.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Northern Long-Eared Bat
FWS Status – T
State Status - T
The northern long-eared bat is a medium-sized bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length but with a
wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. This bat is distinguished by its long ears. During the summer, northern
long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or in crevices of both live and
dead trees, typically within the interior of large blocks of mature forests. It has also been found,
rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, and all “mature forest” is considered potential
roosting habitat by the USFWS.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 8 of 16
The USFWS is protecting the northern long-eared bat under the Endangered Species Act because
of strongly declining populations, largely because of white-nose syndrome, a disease that is severely
affecting this species. Population decline is in no way attributed to loss of roosting habitat. A
proposal to list this bat as Endangered was submitted by USFWS on October 2, 2013, and the bat
gained federal protection when it was officially listed as a Threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act on 04/02/15. Potential roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat is
specified as any forested areas with trees over 3 inches in diameter. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for
the Northern Long-Eared bat specifies that tree removal within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS)
Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than 0.25 miles from known hibernacula and does
not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a 150 ft-
radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 – July 31). The review area is not
located within 0.25 miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees
present within the review area.
The onsite longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was considered suitable roosting habitat for the
northern long-eared bat due to the presence of trees greater than 3 inches in diameter. It should
be noted that the NCNHP data did not identify any known occurrences of the northern long-eared
bat within 1.0 miles of the subject property. Surveys were not conducted to determine whether or
not there were occurrences of the northern long-eared bat onsite.
Since there is potential roosting habitat present, WR concludes that the proposed activities may
effect, but is not likely to affect the northern long-eared bat. However, it should be noted that the
review area does not contain critical habitat (i.e. hibernacula; maternity roost) for the northern
long-eared bat. Additionally, the presence of potential northern long-eared bat roosting habitat is
of no significance, as all forested areas within New Hanover County are considered potential
roosting habitat.
Biological Conclusion – May Affect, Not Likely to Affect
Consultation with the USFWS for an “effect” determination is only required if federal funding is
involved, or a federal permit such as a Department of the Army 404 permit or FEMA permit is
required. Since there are no wetlands or FEMA floodplain with the review area, consultation with
the USFWS would not be required for proposed activities within the review area.
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker
FWS Status – E
State Status - E
The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) occurs in extensive tracts of open stands of mature pines,
particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat, typically 70 to
100 acres or more. The red-cockaded woodpecker is rarely found in deciduous or mixed pine-
hardwoods. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years
or older, which are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat.
Optimal habitat is characterized as a broad savanna with a scattered overstory of large pines and a
dense groundcover containing a diversity of grass, forbs, and shrub species. Midstory vegetation is
sparse or absent. Frequent fires maintain the quality of the RCW’s habitat. The foraging range of
the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 miles.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 9 of 16
The onsite longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was considered marginal RCW nesting habitat due to the
relatively young age of the longleaf pines, as well as the density of the understory. During the
pedestrian survey, WR observed each mature pine for evidence of active or abandoned cavity trees.
No active or abandoned cavity trees were observed during the pedestrian survey of the review area.
Therefore, the review area does not contain an RCW nesting habitat.
Areas within the review area where the understory was sparse were considered potential RCW
foraging habitat. Therefore, in accordance with Appendix 4 of the USFWS 2003 “Recovery Plan of
the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Second Revision”, WR conducted a pedestrian survey of all
potential nesting habitat within a 0.5 mile radius of the review area.
Aerial photography and GIS was used to establish the 0.5 mile survey limits and to identify potential
RCW nesting within the survey limits as depicted in the RCW Nest Survey Exhibit. The limits of the
0.5 mile review area was created in ArcGIS and downloaded into a Trimble mapping grade GPS unit
in order to locate the limits of the survey area in the field. Portions of the 0.5 mile survey are north
and south of the review area along US 421 had been recently cleared. The pine stand immediately
west of the review area is less than 20 years old and therefore investigation was not necessary. The
pine dominated stands immediately north and east of the review were reviewed by pedestrian
survey and these areas lacked trees of adequate age and size for nesting. Additionally, the
understory within these areas was much too dense to be potential nesting habitat.
The pine dominated area to the northeast of the review area is located within the New Hanover
County Landfill site. Extensive surveys of this area have been completed during the investigations
for the Natural Area Inventory of New Hanover County by NCNHP, as well as additional surveys
completed for the permitted expansion of the landfill. The NCNHP data referenced survey data
within this area as recent as Fall of 2015, and did not identify any known occurrences of RCWs
within this area despite the numerous investigations completed for this area. Therefore, pedestrian
surveys were not conducted in this area, as the likelihood of an undocumented RCW colony
occurring within this area is unlikely.
A mature stand of pines with adequate age and size to be suitable nesting habitat was identified
along the perimeter of Sutton Lake. A pedestrian survey was conducted within these areas, and
each mature tree was observed for evidence of active or abandoned cavity trees, but none were
found.
In general, the pine dominated areas within 0.5 miles of the review area contain trees that are too
young, and the understory is too dense to be considered potential RCW nesting habitat. Pedestrian
surveys for active or abandoned cavity trees were negative, and it appears that RCW nest sites are
not located within 0.5 miles of the review area. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP GIS data did
not identify any known occurrences of RCW within 1.0 miles of the review area. Therefore, WR
concludes that the proposed activities will have No Effect on red-cockaded woodpeckers.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 10 of 16
Southern Hognose Snake
FWS Status – FSC
State Status – SC
The southern hognose snake is a fairly small, heavily bodied snake that reaches about 24 inches in
length. These snakes are easily distinguished from most snakes by their pointed, upturned snouts.
The southern hognose snake is gray, tan or reddish in color with a series of dark brown blotches
down the center of the back and alternating smaller blotches along the sides. Habitat consists of
open, xeric habitats with well drained, sandy or sandy-loam soils associated with sand ridges, pine
flatwood, mixed oak-pine woodlands and forests and coastal dune habitats. This species lives
underground and hunts during the day.
It should be noted that the southern hognose snake is not classified by the USFWS or State as a
Species of Special Concern, and therefore this species is not protected.
The onsite longleaf pine/turkey oak forest was determined to be potential habitat for the southern
hognose snake. During the pedestrian survey, no individuals were observed. NCNHP records
identify that a southern hognose snake was observed within the adjacent Sutton Lake Gamelands
in 2008.
The proposed activities within the review area will result in the removal of habitat for the southern
hognose snake. Very little potential habitat exists to the south of the review area, as this area has
been heavily developed. Suitable habitat exists to the west, north and east of the review area for
any southern hognose snakes that may be displaced by the proposed activities. Additionally, there
is existing habitat within the Duke Energy property to the west that will continue to serve as a travel
corridor along the western edge of the review area.
While the onsite potential habitat for the southern hognose snake will be eliminated by the
proposed activities, the presence of suitable habitat immediately adjacent the review area
diminishes the overall effect on the species. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities
may effect, but are not likely to adversely affect the southern hognose snake.
Biological Conclusion – May Effect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Plants
Cooley’s Meadowrue
FWS Status – E
State Status – E
Cooley’s meadowrue is a perennial herb originating from an underground rhizome which usually
grows up to 3 feet in height. In full sun, the stems are erect, and when shaded, stems are lax and may
trail on the ground or lean on other plants. The compound green leaves have leaflets which are
lance-shaped and less than 2 cm long. Cooley’s meadowrue occurs on circumneutral soils in grass-
sedge bogs and wetland pine savannahs and savannah like areas. It may also grow along fire flow
lines, in roadside ditches, woodland clearings and power line right of way, and needs some type of
disturbance such as fire or mowing to maintain open habitat. Plants often found growing with
Cooley’s meadowrue include tulip poplar growing with bald cypress and/or Atlantic white cedar.
Cooley’s meadowrue flowers in mid-June to early-July.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 11 of 16
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for Cooley’s meadowrue within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on Cooley’s meadowrue.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Florida Scrub Frostweed
FWS Status – None
State Status – E
Florida scrub frostweed is a perennial flower, growing to 20 inches tall. Stems are covered with gray
hairs or are smooth. Leaves are alternate, pale green on both surfaces. Flowers are of 2 kinds;
closed with petals lacking or poorly developed and open with 5 yellow petals. Habitat consists of
xeric sandy areas.
Survey efforts for Florida scrub frostweed were focused primarily within areas of the longleaf
pine/turkey oak forest where the understory and herbaceous strata were sparse, where this species
is mostly to occur. With the exception of the few areas of barren sand, the leaf litter ranged from 3-
6 inches deep due to lack of recent fires, which further limited the potential habitat. The pedestrian
survey did not identify any Florida scrub frostweed plants within the areas identified as potential
habitat.
Based on the lack of observation of Florida scrub frostweed during the pedestrian survey, it is WR’s
opinion that this species is not present within the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the
proposed activities will have No Effect on Florida scrub frostweed.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Golden Sedge
FWS Status – E
State Status – E
Golden sedge, a very rare perennial grass endemic of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, grows in sandy soils
overlying calcareous deposits of coquina limestone, where the soil pH, typically between 5.5 and
7.2, is unusually high for this region. Golden sedge prefers the ecotone between the pine savanna
and adjacent wet hardwood or hardwood/conifer forest. Most plants occur in partially shaded
savanna/swamp where occasional to frequent fires favor an herbaceous ground layer and suppress
shrub dominance. Soils supporting the species are very wet to periodically shallowly inundated.
Other occurrences may occur on disturbed areas such as roadside and drainage ditches or power
line rights-of-way, where mowing and/or very wet conditions suppress woody plants. Poorly viable
occurrences may occur in significantly disturbed areas where ditching activities that lower the
water table and/or some evidence of fire suppression threatens the species.
Survey efforts for golden sedge were focused within the three small low lying areas along the
central access road and western property boundary, as these areas were considered marginal
habitat. The lack of hydrologic indicators within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface confirmed
that these areas on only saturated for very short periods, and the “very wet to periodically
inundated” conditions to support a population of golden sedge were not present. Therefore, these
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 12 of 16
areas do not contain habitat for golden sedge. Additionally, the pedestrian survey did not identify
any individual golden sedge plants present.
Due to a lack of habitat and lack of observation of golden sedge plants within the review area, WR
concludes that the proposed activities will have No Effect on golden sedge.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Lace-Lip Ladies’ Tresses
FWS Status – None
State Status – SC-V
Lace-lip ladies’-tresses is a perennial flower growing from 1-3 feet tall from fleshy root systems that
are sometimes thick and appear tuberous. Flowering occurs around May, and flowers are white or
cream, which grow in a spiral around a terminal spike. Flowers twist during development into an
upside down position. This plant is typically found in moist to wet habitats associated with swamps,
marshes, wet meadows, roadsides, ditches and savannahs.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for lace-lip ladies’ tresses within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on lace-lip ladies’ tresses.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Pickering’s Dawnflower
FWS Status – FSC
State Status – SC-V
Pickering’s dawnflower is a perennial herbaceous, trailing vine with linear leaves and small, white
morning-glory-like flowers. The plant can grow to 3-6 feet in length, and flowers profusely from
late-May to mid-August. Habitat consists of dry to xeric, nutrient poor, well drained, coarse sandy
soils with little competing vegetation or litter. Tree cover is sparse to non-existent, composed of
pines and scrubby oaks.
Survey efforts for Pickering’s dawnflower were focused primarily within areas of the longleaf
pine/turkey oak forest where the understory and herbaceous strata were sparse, where this species
is mostly to occur. With the exception of the few areas of barren sand, the leaf litter ranged from 3-
6 inches deep due to lack of recent fires, which further limited the potential habitat. The pedestrian
survey did not identify any Pickering’s dawnflower plants within the areas identified as potential
habitat.
Based on the lack of observation of Pickering’s dawnflower during the pedestrian survey, it is WR’s
opinion that the species is not present within the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the
proposed activities will have No Effect on Pickering’s dawnflower.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 13 of 16
Robbin’s Spikerush
FWS Status – None
State Status – SC-V
Robbin’s spikerush is a perennial herb that grows up to 3 feet tall. It has erect, flowering stems that
are sharply triangular in a cross-section. Leaves are greenish spikelets which consist only of
bladeless sheaths. Robbin’s spikerush grows in the shallow waters of limesink ponds, clay-based
Carolina bays, peat-burn lakes, millponds, beaver ponds, artificial lakes, ditches and drainage canals.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for Robbin’s spikerush within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on Robbin’s spikerush.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Rough-Leaved Loosestrife
FWS Status – E
State Status - E
Rough-leaved loosestrife is an erect, rhizomatous, late spring- to early summer-flowering perennial
herb which grows to 2 feet tall. Its leaves are mostly 3-whorled, lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate,
sessile, and 2-4 cm long. There are usually three conspicuous veins on each leaf. The inflorescence
is terminal with 5-petaled, showy, yellow flowers. The fruit is an ovoid or subglobose capsule, 3-4.5
mm in diameter, with several somewhat winged seeds. Rough-leaf loosestrife occurs most often in
ecotones between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins in moist, sandy or peaty soils with
low vegetation that allows for abundant sunlight to the herb layer. Fire is primarily responsible for
maintaining low vegetation in these ecotones.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for rough-leaved loosestrife within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on rough-leaved loosestrife.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Sandhills Milkvetch
FWS Status – FSC
State Status – SC-V
Sandhills milkvetch is a perennial herb, with erect, solitary stems growing 1-3 feet tall. Leaves are
alternating, up to 6 inches long. Flowering occurs from May-June, and flowers are pale to dark
purple, and resemble pea flowers. In NC, sandhills milkvetch can be found in xeric longleaf pine/
scrub oak/wiregrass communities. Sandhills milkvetch habitat is fire-dependent to maintain a
sparse subcanopy and herbaceous strata. Soils are typically coarse, nutrient poor sands that are
commonly underlain by a clay layer close to or several meters below the surface.
Survey efforts for sandhills milkvetch were focused primarily within areas of the longleaf
pine/turkey oak forest where the understory and herbaceous strata were sparse, where this species
is mostly to occur. With the exception of the few areas of barren sand, the leaf litter ranged from 3-
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 14 of 16
6 inches deep due to lack of recent fires. The pedestrian survey did not identify any sandhills
milkvetch plants within the areas identified as potential habitat.
Based on the lack of observation of sandhills milkvetch during the pedestrian survey, it is WR’s
opinion that this species is not present within the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the
proposed activities will have No Effect on sandhills milkvetch.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Shrubby Seedbox
FWS Status – None
State Status – T
Shrubby seedbox is a perennial herb that grows to 1-3 feet in height. Leaves are 1-4 cm long and
are alternate and glabrous. Flowers are white with red/pink centers. Shrubby seedbox grows in
limesink ponds and clay-based Carolina bays.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for shrubby seedbox within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on shrubby seedbox.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
Viviparous Spikerush
FWS Status – None
State Status – E
Viviparous spikerush is a perennial sedge that grows in clumps of thin stems that can grow to 12
inches in height. A spike of white flowers appear at the tip of the stems. Habitat consists of bogs
and pools with shallow water depths.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for viviparous spikerush within or
immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities will
have No Effect on viviparous spikerush.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
West Indies Meadow-Beauty
FWS Status – None
State Status – W1
The West Indies meadow-beauty is a perennial herb that grows 1-2 feet tall. Flowers are purple
with four petals. The plant is typically found growing in limesink ponds.
The pedestrian survey did not identify any potential habitat for West Indies meadow-beauty within
or immediately adjacent to the review area. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed activities
will have No Effect on West Indies meadow-beauty.
Biological Conclusion – No Effect
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 15 of 16
New Hanover County CAMA Land Use Plan Consistency Determination
The CAMA Land Use Plan for New Hanover County (2006) classifies the property as a Natural
Heritage Resource Protection Area, which is located in the northwest corner of the county. Natural
Heritage Resource Protection Areas are identified by the NC DEQ Natural Heritage Program as
generally unique habitats that warrant special attention and protection. The threat to these areas
is loss of habitat or fragmentation of habitat that may be crucial to a particular natural community
identified as important. The focus of strategies for the Natural Heritage Resource Protection Area
is to better identify these area and develop specific protection strategies.
The review area was intensively reviewed for the presence of threatened, endangered or rare
species and/or critical habitat. There are no threatened, endangered or rare species or their critical
habitat present within the review area, with the exception of potential roosting habitat for the
northern long-eared bat. While potential roosting habitat is present, there review area is not
located within 0.25 miles of hibernacula, or within 125 lf of a maternity roost. Therefore, while
potential northern long-eared bat roosting habitat is present within the review area, it is not
considered critical habitat.
Therefore, due to a lack of threatened, endangered and rare species, and lack of critical habitat for
such species within the review area, specific protection strategies are not warranted for the
proposed construction of a mine within the review area.
Summary
The review area consists entirely of uplands and does not contain wetlands or surface waters. As a
result, permits from the Corps of Engineers or NC Division of Water Resource – 401 Wetlands Unit
are not required for the construction of the proposed mine within the review area.
The survey for federal and state listed threatened and endangered species, as well as species of
special concern resulted in a biological conclusion that the construction of a mine within the review
area will have “No Effect” on the American alligator, bald eagle, coachwhip, eastern fox squirrel, red-
cockaded woodpecker and all listed plants due to either a lack of habitat or the lack of presence of
the species within the review area.
Due to the presence of potential roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat, and potential
habitat for the southern hognose snake, the biological conclusion is that the construction of a mine
within the review area “May Affect, But Not Likely to Adversely Affect” these species. However,
the review area does not contain critical habitat for either species.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the contents of this report.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Page 16 of 16
Attachments:
1) Aerial Photo (2012)
2) Topography Exhibit
3) Cape Fear Basin Exhibit
4) Vegetative Communities Exhibit
5) USGS Quads
6) New Hanover County Soil Survey
7) USFWS T&E List for New Hanover County
8) USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map
9) Bald Eagle Nest Survey Exhibit
10) RCW Nest Survey Exhibit
11) 421 Sand Ridge Excerpt from Natural Area Inventory of New Hanover County (2003)
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AERIAL PHOTO (2012)
REVIEW AREA
BOUNDARY
INVISTA PLANT
U
S
4
2
1
C
R
X
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
PO WER
L
I
N
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
POWE
R
L
I
N
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
EXISTING
SAND MINE
DUKE ENERGY
PROPERTY
DUKE ENERGY
PROPERTY
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION AERIAL - 2012
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
TOPOGRAPHY EXHIBIT
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION TOPOGRAPHY EXHIBIT
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
CAPE FEAR RIVER
BASIN EXHIBIT
U
S
4
2
1
C
R
X
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
REVIEW AREA
BOUNDARY
CAPE FEAR
RIVER BASIN
HUC: 03030007
CAPE FEAR
RIVER BASIN
HUC: 03030005
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION CAPE FEAR BASIN EXHIBIT
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES
EXHIBIT
U
S
4
2
1
C
R
X
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
REVIEW AREA
BOUNDARY
LOW LYING
AREAS
MAINTAINED
CORRIDORS
LP/TO
LP/TO
LP/TO
L
P
/T
O
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES EXHIBIT
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
LP/TO = LONGLEAF PINE/TURKEY OAK FOREST
= MAINTAINED CORRIDOR
= LOW LYING AREAS
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION USGS QUAD (2013) - CASTLE HAYNE
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 3000 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15003000
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION USGS QUAD (2013) - CASTLE HAYNE
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NEW HANOVER CO.
SOIL SURVEY (1977)
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION SOIL SURVEY (1977) - SHEET 6
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 500 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250500
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
NEW HANOVER CO.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USFWS T&E LIST FOR
NEW HANOVER CO.
End angered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Not e:Marine Threatened and Endangered Species information can be found at the National Marine
Fis eries Service (NMFS) Endangered and Threatened Species website
Upd ated: 4-2-2015
Critical Habitat Designations:
Piping plover - Charadrius melodus - See the Federal Register for a description of the primary
constituent elements essential for the conservation of wintering piping plovers within the designated
units. This document also contains a map and a description of each designated unit.
Federal Register Reference: July10, 2001, Federal Register, 66: 36038-36136.
Loggerhead Sea Turtle - Caretta caretta - See the Federal Register for a description of the primary
constituent elements essential for the conservation of nesting Loggerhead sea turtles within the
designated units. This document also contains a map and a description of each designated unit.
Federal Register Reference: July10, 2014, Federal Register, 79:51264-51266
Common Name Scientific name Federal
Status
Record Status
Vertebrate:
American alligator All igator mississippiensis T (S/A)Current
American eel Anguilla rostrata FSC Current
Carolina gopher frog Rana capitocapito FSC Current
Eastern painted bunting Passerina cirisciris FSC Current
Green sea turtle Che lonia mydas T Current
Pag e 1 of 4New Hanover County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Conce ...
7/20/2016https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new_hanover.html
Hawk sbill (=carey) sea turtle Ere tmochelys imb ricata E His toric
Kem p's (=Atlantic) ridley sea
tur tle
Lep idochelys kempii E Current
Leatherback sea turtle Der mochelys coriacea E Current
Loggerhead sea turtle Car etta caretta T Current
Mimic glass lizard Ophisaurusmimicus FSC Historic
Northern long-eared bat Myo tis septentrionalis T Current
Northern pine snake Pituophis melanoleucus
melanoleucus
FSC Current
Piping plover Cha radrius melodus T Current
Rafinesque's big-eared bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii FSC Current
Red-cockaded woodpecker Pic oides borealis E Current
Red knot Cal idris canutus rufa T Current
Southeastern myotis Myotis austroriparius FSC Current
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus FSC Current
West Indian manatee Tri chechus manatus E Current
Invertebrate:
Buchholz's dart moth Agrotis buchholzi FSC Current
Cape Fear threetooth Triodopsis soelneri FSC Current
Eastern beard grass skipper Atrytone arogosarogos FSC Obscure
Greenfield rams-horn Helisoma eucosmium FSC Historic
Loammi skipper Atrytonopsis loammi FSC Obscure
Magnificent rams-horn Planorbella magnifica FSC Historic
Rare skipper Problema bulenta FSC Current
Vascular Plant:
Bog St. John's-wort Hypericum adpressum FSC Historic
Carolina bishopweed Ptilimnium ahlesii FSC Current
Carolina lead-plant Amorpha georgiana var.
confusa
FSC Historic
Coastal beaksedge Rhynchospora pleiantha FSC Current
Coastal goldenrod Solidago villosicarpa FSC Historic
Cooley's meadowrue Tha lictrum cooleyi E Current
Dune blue curls Trichostema sp. 1 FSC Current
False coco Pteroglossaspis ecristata FSC Historic
Golden sedge Car ex lutea E Probable/Potential
Grassleaf arrowhead Sagittaria weatherbiana FSC Current
Pickering's dawnflower Stylismapickeringii var.
pickeringii
FSC Current
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis FSC Current
Raven's boxseed Ludwigia ravenii FSC Historic
Rough-leaved loosestrife Lys imachia asperulaefolia E Current
Pag e 2 of 4New Hanover County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Conce ...
7/20/2016https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new_hanover.html
San dhills milk-vetch Ast ragalus mic hauxii FSC His toric
Sea beach amaranth Ama ranthus pumilus T Current
Small-leaved meadow-rue Thalictrum macrostylum FSC Current
Spring-flowering goldenrod Solidago verna FSC Current
Tough bumelia Sideroxylon tenax FSC Historic
Venus' fly-trap Dionaeamuscipula FSC Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered
Species Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or
otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species
petitioned by outside parties and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans,
State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not
biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or
"PT", respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and
removed (de-listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took
effect August 8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16
U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of
bald and golden eagles and provides a statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The
USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land
managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald eagles. For mor information,
visit http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Thr eatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle
(from New York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from
Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T
Pag e 3 of 4New Hanover County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Conce ...
7/20/2016https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new_hanover.html
(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles
fro m the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by
private landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its
official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the
bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Cur rent - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
Pag e 4 of 4New Hanover County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Conce ...
7/20/2016https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/new_hanover.html
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USFWS NATIONAL WETLAND
INVENTORY MAP
Sutton Lake Mine Expansion - ±80.43 acres
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
July 27, 2016
0 0.45 0.90.225 mi
0 0.7 1.40.35 km
1:26,899
This page was produced by the NWI mapper
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
BALD EAGLE NEST
SURVEY EXHIBIT
U
S
4
2
1
C
R
X
R
A
I
L
R
O
A
D
66 0’
BALD EAGLE NEST
SURVEY LIMITS
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION 660' BALD EAGLE NEST SURVEY EXHIBIT
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 600 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300600
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
RCW NEST
SURVEY EXHIBIT
C
L
E
A
R
E
D
C
L
E
A
R
E
D
EXISTING
MINE
BALD EAGLE NEST
SURVEY BOUNDARY
(0.5 MILES)
POTENTIAL RCW
NESTING HABITAT
NEW HANOVER CO.
LANDFILL PROPERTY
SUTTON LAKE MINE EXPANSION RCW NEST SURVEY EXHIBIT (0.5 MILES)
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
1 inch = 1000 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 5001000
WithersRavenel
Engineers | Planners | Surveyors
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
421 SAND RIDGE EXERPT FROM
NCNHP NATURAL AREA INVENTORY
OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY (2003)
63
New Hanover County Natural Area Inventory
421 SAND RIDGE
Significant Natural Heritage Area
Site significance: state
Size: 7966 acres: 7071 acres within primary boundary (2029 in New Hanover County), 895 acres
in secondary boundary (341 in New Hanover County)
Quadrangles: Castle Hayne, Currie, Leland Ownership: New Hanover Co., private
SIGNIFICANT FEATURES: 421 Sand Ridge is one of the best formed and largest of the aeolian
sand ridges associated with the Coastal Plain terraces east and northeast of the Cape Fear River
south from Cumberland County. Although fragmented by industrial development, primarily in New
Hanover County, the site continues to support extensive natural habitat with eight community types
or variants, including the rare Cypress Savanna. Ten rare plants and four rare animals have been
identified from the site. Among the rare plants is the Federally and State Endangered rough-leaf
loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia), and four Federal Species of Concern: Sandhills milkvetch
(Astragalus michauxii),Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula), Carolina goldenrod (Solidago pulchra),
and Pickering’s dawnflower (Stylisma pickeringii var. pickeringii). Among the rare animals are the
Federally and State Endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and Federal Species
of Concern southern hognose snake (Heterodon simus).
LANDSCAPE RELATIONSHIPS: This site is located in northern New Hanover County and
southern Pender County on the long north/south sand ridge between the lower reaches of the
Northeast Cape Fear River on the east and Black River and Cape Fear River on the west. It extends
southward from near Bear Branch in Pender County to just north of the confluence of Cape Fear and
Northeast Cape Fear rivers in New Hanover County. Bio-geographically, it is a pivotal area
connecting major ecosystems in southeastern North Carolina. It is directly connected eastward to
the Northeast Cape Fear River Floodplain natural area, and from there to the Camp Lejeune/Holly
Shelter Megasite extending east into Onslow County. To the west it is directly connected to the
Black River Floodplain Macrosite, and from there to Bladen Lakes Natural Areas Megasite
extending northward into Bladen, Sampson, and Cumberland counties. Southward it is directly
connected to Brunswick River/Cape Fear River Marshes natural area in New Hanover and
Brunswick counties. Within the natural area, the primary boundary includes habitat in good natural
condition and/or with other exceptional biological values, while the secondary boundary includes
areas of lesser natural value, but which buffer primary habitat and/or have good restoration potential.
SITE DESCRIPTION: 421 Sand Ridge is characterized by rolling sandhills interspersed with
numerous irregular, elliptical, and nearly round depressions, including examples of the Carolina bay
geomorphic feature. The uplands support four longleaf pine ecosystem communities: Wet Pine
Flatwoods Wet Spodosol Variant, and Xeric Sandhill Scrub Sand Barren, Coastal Plain, and Coastal
Fringe variants. (The rare Coastal Fringe Sandhill community, formerly occurring in the southern
portion of this site, has been destroyed by logging.) Dry-Mesic Oak–Hickory Forest occurs on
slopes above Fishing Creek, where fire appears to have been rare naturally. Depressions that
64
intersect the water table support three wetland community types: Cypress Savanna, Small
Depression Pocosin, and Vernal Pool. A few wet depressions have permanent aquatic zones and
belong to the Small Depression Pond community but have been disturbed by logging, nutrient input,
and other impacts.
Wet Pine Flatwoods Wet Spodosol Variant occurs on wet sandy soil that tends to dry out in the latter
stages of the growing season. It is found on low flats within and adjacent to sandhill habitat at 421
Sand Ridge. Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) is the canopy dominant, with pond pine (P. serotina)
locally prominent. The shrub layer is patchy to moderate, with dwarf huckleberry (Gaylussacia
dumosa) dominant, and staggerbush (Lyonia mariana), inkberry (Ilex glabra), and a St. John’s-wort
(Hypericum reductum) forming patches. The ground layer is moderate to moderately dense with
Carolina wiregrass (Aristida stricta) dominant, creeping blueberry (Vaccinium crassifolium)
subdominant to co-dominant, and the uncommon southern bogbutton (Lachnocaulon beyrichianum)
locally prominent.
Xeric Sandhill Scrub Sand Barren Variant occurs on the driest and most excessively drained sand
ridges. The canopy is sparse to moderately open, and exclusively dominated by small longleaf pine
trees typically 35-45 feet high, with the moderate to moderately dense understory dominated by
small turkey oaks (Quercus laevis) 10-15 feet high. Carolina October-flower (Polygonella
polygama var. croomii) is prominent in the sparse to patchy shrub layer, with Carolina wiregrass
prominent in the sparse ground layer, where reindeer lichen (Cladonia sp.) forms patches. This
community variant does not appear to burn frequently naturally, likely due to the sparseness of the
ground vegetation. The openness of the various stratal layers is apparently due to the extreme
dryness. The occurrence of this community in the New Hanover County portion of the site has been
destroyed by logging, but the community persists in the Pender County portion.
Dry but not as excessively drained sandhill areas support Xeric Sandhill Scrub Coastal Plain
Variant, the dominant community type over much of the site. Conditions are variable, depending
on soil moisture, and fire and logging history. Canopy density varies from sparse to moderately
dense, with longleaf pine dominant. The oak understory is moderate to moderately dense, with
turkey oak dominant. The shrub and ground layers are sparse to patchy, in some areas due to litter
accumulation and increased understory density due to lack of fire, and in other areas apparently due
to pinestraw raking. Dwarf huckleberry and seedling longleaf pine are patch dominants in the shrub
layer, with Carolina wiregrass and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) prominent in the
sparse ground layer.
A small sandhill area near the southern end of the sand ridge in New Hanover County supports the
uncommon Xeric Sandhill Scrub Coastal Fringe Variant community. It also occurs on very dry soil,
but contains some species primarily found along the coast, such as sand live oak (Quercus geminata)
and sandhill beaksedge (Rhynchospora megalocarpa). Like other sandhill sites in the region, the
open to patchy canopy is dominated by longleaf pine with turkey oak forming a moderately dense
to moderate understory. Sand live oak and sand laurel oak (Q. hemisphaerica) are also found in the
understory. Reindeer lichen is dominant in the open to patchy ground layer, with little bluestem
65
prominent. This community contains two very rare plants, Florida scrub frostweed (Helianthemum
nashii) and Pickering’s dawnflower, plus the rare southern hognose snake.
Dry-Mesic Oak–Hickory Forest occurs on bluffs and slopes above the floodplain of the Northeast
Cape Fear River and Fishing Creek along the east side of the site. This community type is restricted
to areas naturally protected from fire by the floodplain slopes. The canopy is dominated by sand
laurel oak, with mockernut hickory (Carya alba) prominent. The understory is diverse, with
common pawpaw (Asimina triloba), wild olive (Osmanthus americanus), witch-hazel (Hamamelis
virginiana), American holly (Ilex opaca), and farkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum) prominent. This
community is bordered by Xeric Sandhill Scrub at the slope summit (where not cleared), and by
marsh and swamp habitat at the slope base.
A small Carolina bay in the Pender County portion of the site supports the rare Cypress Savanna
community. Carolina bays are elliptical wetland basins surrounded by arcuate, usually dry sand
ridges called bay rims. Cypress Savannas, especially rare on the outer Coastal Plain, occur in
depressions that are shallowly flooded for much of the year, but tend to be exposed during at least
the latter part of the growing season. They are characterized by an open canopy of pond-cypress
(Taxodium ascendens), swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), and swamp red maple (Acer rubrum var.
trilobum) over an herbaceous ground layer. Dominant herbs include maidencane (Panicum
hemitomon), redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana), and Virginia chainfern (Woodwardia virginica).
Other prominent herbs include soft-headed pipewort (Eriocaulon compressum) and witch grasses
(Dichanthelium spp.). This community formerly occurred in a depression near the southern end of
the site in New Hanover County, but was severely impacted by logging.
Small isolated basins that intersect the water table support either the Small Depression Pocosin or
Vernal Pool communities. Small Depression Pocosin occurs on saturated peats in isolated basins
within the sandhill communities. It is characterized by an open canopy over a dense shrub layer.
Pond pine is the canopy dominant, with fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) dominant and southern highbush
blueberry (Vaccinium formosum) and staggerbush abundant. The Vernal Pool community occurs
in small depressions that typically flood in winter and spring and dry out by summer. This produces
ideal breeding conditions for amphibians. The seasonal pool typically is dominated by such grasses
as switchcane (Panicum virgatum) and white bluestem (Andropogon capillipes). Swamp tupelo and
swamp red maple are present at some pools.
421 Sand Ridge is an important wildlife area. The majority of habitat is dry sandhill with an open
canopy, moderate understory, and sparse to patchy shrub and ground layers. Several small isolated
depressions contain wetlands. These conditions provide home and foraging habitat for many animal
species, including critical habitat for populations of the Federally and State Endangered red-
cockaded woodpecker. However, extensive logging in the 1980s eliminated much habitat for this
species in this area. The sandhill understory oaks provide mast for game animals, and the isolated
depressions provide potential amphibian breeding sites. However, habitat has become increasingly
segmented and isolated over time due primarily to industrial development, largely in New Hanover
County. Such fragmentation can seriously impact several groups of animals.
66
MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION: Natural habitat in 421 Sand Ridge has experienced a
considerable reduction in recent years, especially in New Hanover County. Much habitat has been
eliminated by industrial development and for county infrastructure (e.g., a 400-acre landfill). Large
areas in the New Hanover County portion of the site have been logged in recent years, with
considerable surface impact. Remaining habitat has become increasingly fragmented, and variously
impacted by fire suppression (throughout) and pinestraw raking (local). Portions of remnant native
ground layers in powerline corridors have been replaced by large food plots. The US 17 Wilmington
Bypass is scheduled to cross this site, adding to the reduction and fragmentation of remaining natural
habitat. Management efforts should focus on restoring natural processes such as fire, while
protection efforts should seek to preserve large areas of intact or easily restorable natural habitat.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES: Cypress Savanna*, Dry-Mesic Oak–Hickory Forest, Small
Depression Pocosin*, Vernal Pool, Wet Pine Flatwoods Wet Spodosol Variant, Xeric Sandhill Scrub
Coastal Fringe Variant, Xeric Sandhill Scrub Coastal Plain Variant, Xeric Sandhill Scrub Sand
Barren Variant*.
RARE PLANTS: Sandhills milkvetch (Astragalus michauxii), Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula)*,
Robbin’s spikerush (Eleocharis robbinsii), Florida scrub frostweed (Helianthemum nashii),
roughleaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia)*, shrubby seedbox (Ludwigia suffruticosa), West
Indies meadow-beauty (Rhexia cubensis), lace-lip ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes laciniata), Carolina
goldenrod (Solidago pulchra)*, Pickering’s dawnflower (Stylisma pickeringii var. pickeringii).
RARE ANIMALS: southern hognose snake (Heterodon simus), coachwhip (Masticophis
flagellum), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), eastern fox squirrel (Sciurus niger).
*Only in Pender County at this site
REFERENCES:
DuMond, D.M. 1977. Rare plant survey: proposed Northeast Cape Fear River disposal sites.
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers, Wilmington, N.C.
LeBlond, R.J. 1999. Site survey report: 421 Sand Ridge, Takeda survey site. N.C. Natural
Heritage Program, OCCA, DENR, Raleigh, NC.
LeBlond, R.J. 2000. Natural Area Inventory of Pender County, North Carolina. N.C. Natural
Heritage Program, OCCA, DENR, Raleigh, N.C.
Leonard, S.W., and R.J. Davis. 1981. Natural area inventory of 421 Sand Ridge. In Natural Areas
Inventory of Pender County, North Carolina, pp. 106-118. Coastal Energy Impact Program
(CEIP) Report No. 11, N.C. Coastal Management Program.
Schafale, M., A. Weakley, H. LeGrand, and S. Hall. 1993. Natural Heritage site survey report: 421
Sand Ridge, southern portion. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation and
Community Affairs, DENR, Raleigh, N.C.