HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-11-03 November 3 2016 Agenda PackageAGENDA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
Assembly Room , New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301
Wilmington, NC
DONNA GIRARDOT, CHAIRMAN - ERNEST W. OLDS, VICE-CHAIRMAN
PAUL D. BONEY, BOARD MEMBER - H. ALLEN POPE, BOARD MEMBER
THOMAS "JORDY" RAWL, BOARD MEMBER - EDWARD T. (TED) SHIPLEY, III, BOARD MEMBER
DAVID WEAVER, BOARD MEMBER
CHRIS O'KEEFE, PLANNING DIRECTOR - KENNETH VAFIER, PLANNING MANAGER
NOVEMBER 3, 2016 6:00 PM
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chairman Donna Girardot)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Ken Vafier)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The Planning Board may consider substantial changes in these petitions as a result of objections,
debate, and discussion at the meeting, including rezoning to other classifications.
1Public Hearing
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Request (A-425, 9/16) – Request by Planning Staff
to amend Zoning Ordinance Section 70, Section 71, Section 23, and Section 50
regarding Special Use Permit Requirements and the Table of Permitted Uses.
2Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z-963, 11/16) – Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the
property owner, Coastal Carolina Car Wash, LLC, to rezone 0.83 acres located at
6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway
Business District.
3Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z-964, 11/16) – Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the
property owner, Amber Sun, LLC, to rezone 5.00 acres located at 5000 Blue Clay
Road from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I,
Conditional Office and Institutional District, in order to allow for office and school
uses within the existing building located on the property, and to expand the existing
parking lot.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
1TRC Report for September-October 2016
OTHER ITEMS
1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 3, 2016
REGULAR
ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Chris O'Keefe, Planning & Inspections Director
CONTACT(S): Ken Vafier, Planning Manager; Ben Andrea, Current Planning & Zoning Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Request (A-425, 9/16) – Request by Planning Staff to amend Zoning
Ordinance Section 70, Section 71, Section 23, and Section 50 regarding Special Use Permit
Requirements and the Table of Permitted Uses.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
As part of an ongoing dialogue about the county’s special use permit (SUP) regulations, New Hanover
County staff facilitated a meeting in early March 2016 with community representatives both in support and
opposition to draft ordinance revisions that were created after a series of stakeholder input meetings. After
the March 2016 meeting, Planning Staff took the lead on developing a new draft that embellished the points
of improvement that were largely supported throughout the ongoing dialogue, including describing a clear
and predictable process for application, review, and decision making, in addition to revising the table of
permitted uses in a manner that provided clarity for discerning how a particular industry is classified and
regulated by the county.
At the directive of the Board of Commissioners, the new staff-drafted amendment proposal was then
provided to LSL Planning, the consultation team contracted to work with both the City and the County for
comprehensive land use regulation updates. LSL Planning created reports providing recommendations and
feedback on the language proposed by staff for Sections 70 and 71 of the ordinance, in addition to suggesting
how the table of permitted uses could be revised to improve organization and provide clarity for industrial
use classification utilizing the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) coding.
After an initial work session on August 30th, the Planning Board tabled this item at their September 8th
meeting. Two additional work sessions were held on September 22nd and September 29th. The draft text
amendment includes all of the changes recommended by the consultant, staff suggested language, and the
changes discussed at the August 30, September 22, and September 29 Planning Board work sessions.
The Planning Board did not propose changes to the recommended version of the Table of Permitted Uses
(TOPU) during the preliminary work sessions. As such, four options were agreed upon for further discussion
by the Board:
1) NC Coastal Federation version of the TOPU;
2) Planning Board recommended version of the TOPU from 2014;
3) Wake County TOPU provided by Wilmington Chamber of Commerce at the 9/29/16 work session, for
consideration of the format of the document;
4) Receive LSL's Policy Audit and prepare the TOPU based on this analysis.
ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Attract and retain new and expanding businesses
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hold Public Hearing on proposed amendment and either:
- Motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment or an amended version of the proposal
- Motion to table item in order to receive more information
- Motion to recommend denial of the amendment request based on specific reasons
Hold Public Hearing on TOPU options and either:
- Motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendment or an amended version of the proposal for one
of the 4 presented TOPU options
- Motion to table item in order to receive more information
- Motion to recommend denial of the amendment request based on specific reasons
ATTACHMENTS:
A-425 Script
A-425 Proposed Text Amendment
A-425 Option 1 Cover Page
A-425 Option 1
A-425 Option 2 Cover Page
A-425 Option 2
A-425 Option 3 Cover Page
A-425 Option 3
A-425 Option 4 Cover Page
A-425 Option 4
ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
SCRIPT FOR Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (A-425, 9/16)
Request by Planning Staff to amend Zoning Ordinance Section 70, Section 71, Section 23, and Section
50 regarding Special Use Permit Requirements and the Table of Permitted Uses.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. We will then hear from any
members of the public who wish to speak on this item with a time limit of 3 minutes per person.
Persons who have signed up to speak may yield their time to another person if they wish.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Public speakers (3 minutes per person, unless time is yielded others who have signed
up to speak)
3. Close the Public Hearing
4. Planning Board discussion on Sections 70 and 71 (the language pertaining to Special Use Permits)
5. Vote on amending Sections 70 and 71 (the language pertaining to Special Use Permits). The
motion should include a statement saying how the amendment is or is not consistent with the land
use plan and why it is or is not reasonable and in the public interest.
Options for Motions:
Motion to recommend approval of any version of the amendment proposal
Motion to “table” the item in order to receive more information
Motion to recommend denial of the amendment proposal based on specific reasons, such
as the proposal is not consistent with the land use plan and/or the proposal is not
reasonable and/or the proposal is not in the public interest
6. Planning Board discussion on Sections 23 (the TOPU) and Section 50 (the text description of the
table and the proposed “similar uses” language)
7. Vote on amending Sections 23 (the TOPU) and Section 50 (the text description of the table and
the proposed “similar uses” language). The motion should include a statement saying how the
amendment is or is not consistent with the land use plan and why it is or is not reasonable and in
the public interest.
Options for Motions:
Motion to recommend approval of any version of the amendment proposal, including the
following options or modified versions of any TOPU proposal:
1. NC Coastal Federation version of the TOPU;
2. Planning Board recommended version of the TOPU from 2014;
3. Wake County TOPU provided by Wilmington Chamber of Commerce at the
9/29/16 work session, for consideration of the format of the document;
4. Receive LSL's Policy Audit and prepare the TOPU based on this analysis.
Motion to “table” the item in order to receive more information
Motion to recommend denial of the all of the TOPU amendment proposals based on
specific reasons, such as the proposal is not consistent with the land use plan and/or the
proposal is not reasonable and/or the proposal is not in the public interest
- 1 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 1 of 6
A-425 Text Amendment “Clean” Version
Last Update: October 5, 2016
The language below represents a “clean” version of the A-425 text amendment proposal. This version
shows how Article VII of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance would appear based on changes
made after the 8/30/16, 9/22/16, and 9/29/16 Planning Board work sessions.
ARTICLE VII: PROVISIONS FOR USES ALLOWED AS SPECIAL USES 1
2
Section 70: General Information, Applications, Process, Public Notice, Public Hearings, Review and 3
Decision, and Conclusions Required for Approval 4
5
70-1: General 6
7
(1) Special Use Permits add flexibility to the Zoning Ordinance. Subject to high 8
standards of planning and design, certain property uses may be allowed in the 9
several districts where these uses would not otherwise be acceptable. By means 10
of controls exercised through the Special Use Permit procedures, property uses 11
which would otherwise be undesirable in certain districts may be developed to 12
minimize any negative external effects they might have on surrounding 13
properties. 14
15
(2) Any use or development designated by applicable zoning district regulations as a 16
special use, or as allowed only pursuant to a special use permit, may be 17
established in that district only after the use or development is authorized by a 18
validly issued special use permit. 19
20
70-2: Applications 21
22
(1) Applications for a Special Use Permit shall be submitted to the Planning Director 23
or their designee by the owner or owners, or their duly authorized agent, of the 24
property subject to the Special Use Permit petition at least 20 business days prior 25
to an adopted Planning Board meeting date. For Intensive Manufacturing uses, 26
the application must be submitted at least 35 business days prior to the Planning 27
Board meeting date. A schedule of adopted Planning Board meeting dates and 28
the application deadlines shall be available at the Planning Department. Any 29
additional information, documents, etc. submitted after the application deadline 30
must be submitted no later than 10 business days prior to the Planning Board 31
meeting date to be included in the Planning Board agenda package. Additional 32
information and documents may be submitted during the public hearings. 33
34
(2) Applications for a Special Use Permit shall include the following to be considered 35
a complete application: 36
(A) Completed and signed application form for a Special Use Permit 37
(B) Traffic Impact Worksheet 38
(C) Traffic Impact Analysis (only applicable for development proposals that 39
exceed 100 peak hour trip generation) 40
- 2 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 2 of 6
(D) Site Plan, including the elements listed in Section 60.1 41
(E) Narrative of proposal depicting the nature and scope of the proposed 42
development 43
(F) At the discretion of the petitioner, supplemental information, plans, 44
and/or documents that the petitioner intends to use to demonstrate at 45
the public hearing that the conclusions required for approval in Section 46
70-7 are met 47
(G) Authority for Appointment of Agent Form (only applicable if the petition 48
for Special Use Permit is submitted by an agent for the property owner(s)) 49
(H) Application fee based on the adopted fee schedule 50
(I) Community information meeting report for community information 51
meeting per Section 111-2.1 (only for uses classified as Intensive 52
Manufacturing) 53
54
(3) Specific requirements of application requirements may be waived by the 55
respective reviewer, planning director, or planning board, where it is determined 56
that the required information is not applicable to the subject request. 57
58
70-3: Process: 59
60
(1) In order to assist applicants through the process for obtaining a Special Use 61
Permit, applicants may request a pre-application conference with NHC planning 62
staff prior to application submittal. 63
64
(2) The Planning Director or their designee shall review application packages and 65
respond to the petitioner as soon as possible but at most within 5 business days 66
following the application submission to notify the petitioner in writing including 67
regular mail or e-mail of any omissions to the requirements under Section 70-2(2) 68
that render the application incomplete. This review for completeness is to ensure 69
that each of the applicable documents have been submitted as part of the 70
application, and not to verify or substantiate the information provided within the 71
application package. 72
73
(3) Applications with no omissions to the requirements under Section 70-2(2) shall 74
be deemed complete and be calendared for a public hearing at the earliest 75
upcoming Planning Board meeting that allows time for the required legal notices. 76
The Planning Director or their designee shall respond to the petitioner as soon as 77
possible but at most within 5 business days following the application submission 78
in writing including regular mail or e-mail to notify them that the application was 79
deemed complete and confirm the date of the Planning Board meeting at which 80
the public hearing will be held. 81
82
(4) Within 10 business days following an application deadline, complete applications 83
for special use permit petitions shall be posted on the Planning Department web 84
page (www.planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com) in addition to the date, time, and 85
location of the Planning Board meeting at which the public hearing will be 86
calendared. Notification of the posting of the special use permit application(s) 87
- 2 - 2ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 3 of 6
and meeting information shall also be sent to the Sunshine List. Any additional 88
information received from the petitioner after the application deadline shall also 89
be posted on the web page. 90
91
(5) In preparation for the public hearing at the Planning Board for a petition for a 92
special use permit, the Planning Director or their designee shall analyze the 93
information and materials provided in the application package to provide a 94
summary of the request and preliminary findings of fact in the form of a report 95
to be included in the agenda package for the Planning Board meeting. The intent 96
of the report is to inform the Planning Board of whether the Conclusions Required 97
for Approval in Section 71-4 have been met or to identify, from staff’s 98
perspective, issues or areas that the Planning Board may need more information 99
on in order to provide a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners 100
whether each of the required conclusions in Section 70-7 have been met. The 101
staff analysis report shall be published by the Clerk to the Planning Board as part 102
of the agenda package for the Planning Board meeting. 103
104
(6) In preparation for the public hearing at the Board of County Commissioners for a 105
petition for a special use permit, the Planning Director or their designee shall 106
prepare a report summarizing the Special Use Permit request, the information 107
and materials provided in the application package and presented at the Planning 108
Board public hearing(s), the Planning Board’s recommendations, and preliminary 109
findings of fact. The intent of the report is to inform the Board of County 110
Commissioners of whether the Conclusions Required for Approval in Section 71-111
4 have been met or to identify, from staff’s perspective, issues or areas that the 112
Board of County Commissioners may need more information on in order to reach 113
a required conclusion. The staff analysis report shall be published by the Clerk to 114
the Board of County Commissioners as part of the agenda package for the County 115
Commissioners meeting. 116
117
70-4: Public Notice 118
119
(1) Public notice for a petition for a special use permit shall be disseminated per 120
Section 112.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 121
122
70-5: Public Hearings 123
124
(1) A public hearing at the Planning Board for the special use permit application shall 125
be calendared per Section 70-3(3). 126
127
(2) The public hearing for the special use permit application at the Planning Board 128
shall held in a quasi-judicial format. At the hearing, the Planning Board hears 129
factual evidence presented at an evidentiary hearing, then makes 130
recommendations for findings of fact supported by competent, substantial, and 131
material evidence. Based on those recommended findings, the Planning Board 132
may render a recommendation to the County Commissioners on whether each of 133
the required conclusions specified in Section 70-7 can be reached. 134
- 2 - 3ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 4 of 6
135
(3) The Planning Board may continue the hearing to a later meeting to accommodate 136
the presentation of additional testimony or evidence. If the time and place of the 137
continued hearing is announced in open session during the hearing, no further 138
notice need be given for the continued hearing. 139
140
(4) A public hearing at the Board of County Commissioners shall be calendared 141
following the public hearing at which the Planning Board makes a 142
recommendation. 143
144
(5) The public hearing for the special use permit application at the Board of County 145
Commissioners shall held in a quasi-judicial format. At the hearing, the Board 146
hears factual evidence presented at an evidentiary hearing, then makes findings 147
of fact supported by competent, substantial, and material evidence. Based on 148
those findings, the Board of County Commissioners decides whether or not it can 149
reach each of the required conclusions specified in Section 70-7 below. 150
151
(6) The Board of County Commissioners may continue the hearing to a later meeting 152
to accommodate the presentation of additional testimony or evidence. If the time 153
and place of the continued hearing is announced in open session during the 154
hearing, no further notice need be given for the continued hearing. 155
156
70-6 Review and Decision: 157
158
(1) The applicant bears the burden of presenting sufficient evidence in support of the 159
application to allow the Board of County Commissioners, after weighing such 160
evidence against that presented in opposition to the application, to make findings 161
of fact that reasonably support each of the required conclusions outlined in 162
Section 70-7 as well as any applicable specific standards for the proposed use as 163
required by Section 72. If that burden is met, the Board of County Commissioners 164
must approve the application. If that burden is not met, the Board of County 165
Commissioners must deny the application, provided that if the Board of County 166
Commissioners determines that specific minor changes or additions to, or 167
restrictions on, the proposed development are necessary and sufficient to 168
overcome impediments to its reaching the required conclusions, it may approve 169
the application subject to reasonable conditions requiring such changes or 170
additions or imposing such restrictions. Such conditions may include time limits 171
for completion of development or for the start or end of certain uses or activities. 172
173
(2) A motion to approve the application must state the required conclusions and 174
include findings of fact on which the conclusions are based, plus any proposed 175
conditions of approval. The favorable vote of a majority of Board of County 176
Commissioners members present is necessary to pass such a motion. A motion to 177
deny the application must state which of the required conclusions cannot be 178
reached and include findings of fact on which the inability to reach the 179
conclusions is based. The favorable vote of a majority of Board of County 180
Commissioners members present is necessary to pass such a motion. If a motion 181
- 2 - 4ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 5 of 6
to approve the application fails, the application is deemed denied, and those 182
members voting against the motion must state which of the required conclusions 183
they could not reach as well as findings of fact on which their inability to reach 184
the conclusions is based. 185
186
(3) Every decision by the Board of Commissioners issuing or denying a special use 187
permit shall be subject to review by the Superior Court by proceedings in the 188
nature of certiorari. Any petition for review by the Superior Court shall be filed 189
with the Clerk of Superior Court within 30 days after the decision of the Board is 190
filed in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, or after a written copy thereof is 191
delivered to every aggrieved party who has filed a written request for such copy 192
with the Clerk or Chairman of the Board at the time of the hearing of the case, 193
whichever is later. 194
195
70-7: Conclusions Required for Approval – The Board of County Commissioners shall approve 196
an application for a special use permit if it reaches each of the following conclusions based on 197
findings of fact supported by competent, substantial, and material evidence presented at the 198
hearing. 199
200
(1) The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where 201
proposed and approved. 202
(2) The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance; 203
(3) The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, 204
or that the use is a public necessity. 205
206
(4) The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as 207
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be 208
located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New 209
Hanover County. 210
211
Section 71: Validity, Extensions, and Changes for Approved Special Use Permits; Resubmittals of Denied 212
Applications 213
214
71-1: Validity and Extensions of Approved Special Use Permits: 215
216
(1) A special use permit, issued by the Board of County Commissioners, shall become 217
null and void if construction or occupancy of the proposed use as specified on the 218
special use permit is not commenced within twenty-four (24) months of the date 219
of issuance. If an extension is desired, a request must be submitted in writing to 220
the New Hanover County Planning Department prior to the expiration. 221
Extensions may be granted in accordance with Section 112-6 of the Ordinance. 222
223
(2) In the event of failure to comply with the plans approved by the Board of County 224
Commissioners or with any other conditions imposed upon the special use 225
permit, the permit shall thereupon immediately become void and of no effect. 226
No building permits for further construction or certificates of occupancy under 227
this special use permit shall be issued, and all completed structures shall be 228
- 2 - 5ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 6 of 6
regarded as non-conforming uses subject to the provisions of Article IV of this 229
Ordinance provided, however, that the Board of County Commissioners shall not 230
be prevented from thereafter rezoning said property for its most appropriate use. 231
232
71-2 Changes to Approved Special Use Permits: 233
234
(1) The original applicant(s), their successors or their assignee may make minor 235
changes in the location and/or size of structures provided the necessity for these 236
changes is clearly demonstrated. Minor changes shall be reviewed by the 237
Planning Department and upon favorable recommendation by the Planning 238
Director may be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Such approval shall not 239
be granted should the proposed revisions cause or contribute to: 240
(A) A change in the character of the development. 241
(B) A change of design for, or an increase in the hazards to pedestrian and 242
vehicle traffic circulation, or 243
(C) A modification in the originally approved setbacks from roads and/or 244
property lines exceeding ten percent. 245
246
71-3 Resubmittals: 247
248
(1) An application for a special use which has been previously denied may be 249
resubmitted only if there has been a change in circumstances as determined by 250
the Planning Director or the director's designee. Evidence presented in support 251
of the new application shall initially be limited to what is necessary to enable the 252
Planning Director to determine whether there has been a substantial change in 253
the facts, evidence, or conditions of the case and shall include: 254
(A) Circumstances affecting the property that is the subject of the application 255
which have substantially changed since the denial; or 256
(B) New information available since the denial that could not with 257
reasonable diligence have been presented at a previous hearing. 258
If the Planning Director deems the evidence substantially changed, the proposal 259
may be resubmitted as a new application. Appeal of the Planning Director’s 260
decision may be made to the Board of County Commissioners. 261
- 2 - 6ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REQUEST
(A-425, 09/16)
TOPU – OPTION 1
- 3 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
-
4
-
1
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
2
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
3
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
4
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
5
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
6
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
7
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
8
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
9
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
-
4
-
1
0
IT
E
M
:
1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REQUEST
(A-425, 09/16)
TOPU – OPTION 2
- 5 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
A-416 – Planning Board Recommendation – Table of Permitted Uses
A-416 Planning Board Recommendation Page 1
Permitted Uses PD
R
20S
R
20
R
15
R
10
R
7
B
1
B
2
I
1
I
2
O
&
I
A
R
A
I
S
C
R
A
R
F
M
U
Supp
Regs
NAICS
Manufacturing
Artisan Manufacturing P P P P P P P
Limited Manufacturing
Animal Food Manufacturing P S P P P 3111
Grain and Oilseed Milling P S P P P 3112
Sugar and Confectionery Product
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3113
Fruit and Vegetable Preserving and
Specialty Food Manufacturing P
S P P P
3114
Dairy Product Manufacturing P S P P P 3115
Animal Slaughtering and Processing P S P P P 3116
Seafood Product Preparation and
Packaging P
S P P P
3117
Bakeries and Tortilla Manufacturing P S P P P 3118
Other Food Manufacturing P S P P P 3119
Beverage Manufacturing P S P P P 3121
Printing and Related Support
Activities P
S P P
P
3231
Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing P S P P P 3322
Hardware Manufacturing P S P P P 3325
Spring and Wire Product
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3326
Agriculture, Construction, and
Mining Machinery Manufacturing P
S P P P
3331
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing P S P P P 3332
Commercial and Service Industry
Machinery Manufacturing P
S P P P
3333
Ventilation, Heating, Air-
Conditioning, and Commercial
Refrigeration Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3334
Metalworking Machinery
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3335
Engine, Turbine, and Power
Transmission Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3336
Other General Purpose Machinery
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3339
Computer and Peripheral Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3341
- 6 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
A-416 – Planning Board Recommendation – Table of Permitted Uses
A-416 Planning Board Recommendation Page 2
Permitted Uses PD
R
20S
R
20
R
15
R
10
R
7
B
1
B
2
I
1
I
2
O
&
I
A
R
A
I
S
C
R
A
R
F
M
U
Supp
Regs
NAICS
Communications Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3342
Audio and Video Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3343
Semiconductor and Other Electronic
Component Manufacturing P
S P P P
3344
Navigational, Measuring,
Electromedical, and Control
Instruments Manufacturing P
S P P P
3345
Manufacturing and Reproducing
Magnetic and Optical Media P
S P P P
3346
Electric Lighting Equipment
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3351
Household Appliance Manufacturing P S P P P 3352
Electrical Equipment Manufacturing P S P P P 3353
Other Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing P
S P P P
3359
Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing P S P P P 3399
Household and Institutional
Furniture and Kitchen Cabinet
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3371
Office Furniture (including Fixtures)
Manufacturing P
S P P P
3372
Other Furniture Related Product Man. P S P P P 3379
General Manufacturing
Textile and Fabric Finishing and
Fabric Coating Mills
S P
3133
Tobacco Manufacturing S P 3122
Other Textile Product Mills S P 3149
Leather and Hide Tanning and
Finishing
S P
3161
Footwear Manufacturing S P 3162
Other Leather and Allied Product
Manufacturing
S P
3169
Sawmills and Wood Preservation S P 3211
Veneer, Plywood, and Engineered
Wood Product Manufacturing
S P
3212
Other Wood Product Manufacturing S P 3219
Converted Paper Product
Manufacturing
S P
3222
- 6 - 2ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
A-416 – Planning Board Recommendation – Table of Permitted Uses
A-416 Planning Board Recommendation Page 3
Permitted Uses PD
R
20S
R
20
R
15
R
10
R
7
B
1
B
2
I
1
I
2
O
&
I
A
R
A
I
S
C
R
A
R
F
M
U
Supp
Regs
NAICS
Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy
Manufacturing
S P
3311
Steel Product Manufacturing from
Purchased Steel
S
P
3312
Alumina and Aluminum Production
and Processing
S P
3313
Nonferrous Metal (except
Aluminum) Production & Processing
S P
3314
Forging and Stamping S P 3321
Boiler, Tank, and Shipping Container
Manufacturing
S P
3324
Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating,
and Allied Activities
S P
3328
Other Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing
S P
3329
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing S P 3361
Motor Vehicle Body and Trailer
Manufacturing
S P
3362
Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing S P 3363
Aerospace Product and Parts
Manufacturing
S P
3364
Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing S P 3365
Ship and Boat Building S P 3366
Other Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing
S P
3369
Medical Equipment and Supplies
Manufacturing
S
P
3391
Machine Shops; Turned Product; and
Screw, Nut, and Bolt Manufacturing
S P
3327
Architectural and Structural Metals
Manufacturing
S P
3323
Apparel Knitting Mills S P 3151
Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing S P 3152
Apparel Accessories and Other
Apparel Manufacturing
S P
3159
Textile Furnishings Mills S P 3141
Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills S P 3131
Fabric Mills S P 3132
- 6 - 3ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
A-416 – Planning Board Recommendation – Table of Permitted Uses
A-416 Planning Board Recommendation Page 4
Permitted Uses PD
R
20S
R
20
R
15
R
10
R
7
B
1
B
2
I
1
I
2
O
&
I
A
R
A
I
S
C
R
A
R
F
M
U
Supp
Regs
NAICS
Intensive Manufacturing
Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills S 3221
Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing
S
3241
Basic Chemical Manufacturing S 3251
Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and
Artificial Synthetic Fibers and
Filaments Manufacturing
S
3252
Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing
S
3253
Pharmaceutical and Medicine
Manufacturing
S
3254
Paint, Coating, and Adhesive
Manufacturing
S
3255
Soap, Cleaning Compound, and
Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
S
3256
Other Chemical Product and
Preparation Manufacturing
S
3259
Plastics Product Manufacturing S 3261
Rubber Product Manufacturing S 3262
Clay Product and Refractory
Manufacturing
S
3271
Glass and Glass Product
Manufacturing
S
3272
Cement and Concrete Product
Manufacturing
S
3273
Lime and Gypsum Product
Manufacturing
S
3274
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing
S
3279
Foundries S 3315
Fuel Bulk Storage Facilities S
Electricity Generating Facilities S
- 6 - 4ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REQUEST
(A-425, 09/16)
TOPU – OPTION 3
- 7 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 2ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 3ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 4ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 5ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 6ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REQUEST
(A-425, 09/16)
TOPU – OPTION 4
- 9 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
A-425 Option 4 - Receive LSL's Policy Audit and prepare the TOPU based on this analysis.
The fourth option to address the Table of Permitted Uses (TOPU), agreed upon by the Planning
Board at the September 29, 2016 workshop, is to await the final audit and blueprint report (to
include TOPU comments) from LSL Planning. These reports are anticipated to be received in
draft form by staff in November 2016 from the consultant, with a public unveiling of these
documents proposed to occur in early 2017.
In consultation with LSL’s recommendations and utilizing the newly adopted NHC
Comprehensive Plan and Garner Report, staff will draft proposed changes into the current
TOPU (with or without NAICS codes).
Staff will present the new draft TOPU to the NHC Planning Board for review and appropriate
action and adoption.
Following Planning Board adoption, the new TOPU will go to the NHC Commissioners for their
review, appropriate action and adoption.
- 10 - 1ITEM: 1
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 3, 2016
REGULAR
ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Ben Andrea, Current Planning & Zoning Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z-963, 11/16) – Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner,
Coastal Carolina Car Wash, LLC, to rezone 0.83 acres located at 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road
from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The subject property consists of portions of two parcels located at 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road, totaling
0.83 acres. When zoning was initially applied to this area in 1985, a strip of B-2 zoning, approximately 190
feet in width, was established along the eastern side of Castle Hayne Road.
The property is located within the commercial area of Castle Hayne. This area includes general office, retail,
and restaurant uses. Single-family housing surrounds the commercial area and is located directly east of the
property along Blossom Street, an unimproved public right-of-way.
As this is not an application for a conditional zoning district, there is no site plan and no specific uses are
proposed to be developed on the property. If this application is approved, then the property can be developed
in accordance with the standards of the B-2 zoning district.
According to the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the site is classified as Community Mixed Use. This
placetype provides opportunity for lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services.
Commercial uses should be limited to office and retail spaces in carefully located areas where neighborhood
character will be enhanced, while recreation and school facilities are encourage throughout.
The proposal to rezone the property to B-2 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commercial uses are
appropriate within the Community Mixed Use placetype. Also, the B-2 district provides more opportunities
to provide a mixture of residential and commercial uses.
According to the Castle Hayne Community Plan, the site and commercial corridor is classified as
Commercial/Mixed Use. The plan encourages commercial/mixed use development to extend east along
Blossom Street as shown on the below Proposed Land Use Map. Therefore, this application is consistent
with the Castle Hayne Community Plan.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Attract and retain new and expanding businesses
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval and suggests the following motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 0.83 acres from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District as described is:
1.Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because the B-2
zoning district would allow for office and retail uses, which are appropriate within the Community
Mixed Use placetype. The application is also consistent with 2008 Castle Hayne Community Plan,
which identifies the property and surrounding corridor area to be developed for commercial and
mixed use purposes.
2.Reasonable and in the public interest because it encourages commercial and mixed use development
along the Castle Hayne commercial corridor that may serve the area residents and attract additional
customers to support area businesses.
ATTACHMENTS:
Z-963 Script PB
Z-963 Petition Summary
Z-963 Staff Summary
Z-963 Neighborhood Map
Z-963 Zoning Map
Z-963 Comp Plan Map
Z-963 Water Sewer Map
Applicant Materials Cover Sheet
Z-963 Application
ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
SCRIPT FOR Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z-963, 11/16)
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Coastal Carolina Car Wash, LLC,
to rezone 0.83 acres located at 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road from R-15, Residential District,
to B-2, Highway Business District.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5
minutes for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the Public Hearing
4. Board discussion
5. At this time, you may ask to either continue the application to a future meeting, or to proceed
with this Board deciding whether to recommend approval or denial of the application.
What do you wish to do?
6. Vote on the zoning map amendment application. The motion should include a statement
saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why it is, or is not,
reasonable and in the public interest.
Staff Suggested Motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a
zoning map amendment of 0.83 acres from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway
Business District as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
because the B-2 zoning district would allow for office and retail uses, which are
appropriate within the Community Mixed Use placetype. The application is also
consistent with 2008 Castle Hayne Community Plan, which identifies the property and
surrounding corridor area to be developed for commercial and mixed use purposes.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because it encourages commercial and mixed use
development along the Castle Hayne commercial corridor that may serve the area
residents and attract additional customers to support area businesses.
- 1 - 1ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, 11/16 Page 1 of 1
Case Z-963, (11/16)
Rezone from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District
Petition Summary Data
Parcel Location & Acreage: 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road, 0.83 acres
Petitioner/Owner: Cindee Wolf, Design Solutions (Applicant)
Coastal Carolina Car Wash, LLC (Owner)
Existing Land Use: Automobile Service Station (car wash)
Zoning History: July 1, 1985 - Initially zoned B-2 & R-15 via Area Castle Hayne
Land Classification: Community Mixed Use
Water Type: Private Well
Sewer Type: Public
Recreation Area: Riverside Park
Access: Castle Hayne Road (US 117)
Fire District: New Hanover County North
Watershed & Water Quality
Classification: Holly Shelter Creek (C:Sw)
Conservation/Historic/
Archaeological Resources: There are no known conservation, historic, or archaeological resources
on the property.
Soils and Septic Suitability: Kenansville Fine Sand (Ke) – Class I: Suitable/Slight Limitation
Schools: Castle Hayne Elementary, Eaton Elmentary, Holly Shelter Middle, Laney
High
- 2 - 1ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 1 of 6
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
CASE: Z-963, 11/16
PETITIONER: Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions, applicant
Coastal Carolina Car Wash, LLC, property owner
REQUEST: Rezone from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District
ACREAGE: 0.83 acres
LOCATION: 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road
PID: R01109-005-001-000
R01109-004-003-000
2016 COMP PLAN PLACE TYPE: Community Mixed Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Existing Zoning and Land Uses
The subject property consists of portions of two parcels located at 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road,
totaling 0.83 acres. When zoning was initially applied to this area in 1985, a strip of B-2 zoning,
approximately 190 feet in width, was established along the eastern side of Castle Hayne Road. As this B-
2 district did not follow rear property lines, it created many split zoned properties consisting of B-2 and R-
15 zoning. This rezoning application, if approved, would zone the subject parcels entirely B-2.
The property is located within the commercial area of Castle Hayne. This area includes general office,
retail, and restaurant uses. Single-family housing surrounds the commercial area and is located directly
east of the property along Blossom Street, an unimproved public right-of-way.
- 3 - 1ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 2 of 6
Existing Site Conditions
Currently, a car washing business operates in the B-2 zoned portion at 6100 Castle Hayne Road. The R-15
zoned portion was previously used as a mobile home park, however that use has since been discontinued.
The R-15 portion and the parcel at 6016 Castle Hayne Road are currently undeveloped.
Parcels included in the rezoning application
Area proposed to be rezoned
Community Services
Water and Sewer:
The property has access to public sewer (CFPUA). Public water is unavailable.
Fire Protection:
The property is served by New Hanover County Fire Services and located in the New Hanover County
North Fire District.
- 3 - 2ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 3 of 6
Schools:
The property is located within the school districts for Castle Hayne Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Holly
Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools.
Conservation, Historic, and Archaeological Resources
The subject property does not host any known conservation, historic, or archaeological resources.
PETITIONER’S REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking to rezone 0.83 acres currently zoned R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway
Business District.
STAFF POSITION:
Zoning Ordinance Considerations
The purpose of the Highway Business District is to provide for the proper grouping and development of
roadside business uses which will best accommodate the needs of the motoring public and businesses
demanding of high volume traffic. The district’s principle means of ingress and egress shall be along
collector roads, minor arterials, and/or major arterials.
As this is not an application for a conditional zoning district, there is no site plan and no specific uses are
proposed to be developed on the property. If this application is approved, then the property can be
developed in accordance with the standards of the B-2 zoning district.
Transportation
The Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) conducted a traffic count at the 6100 block
of Castle Hayne Road in 2015. The count yielded an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 15,324 trips. Castle
Hayne Road has a design capacity of 16,200 daily trips, and therefore it is classified as having an “E” Level
of Service (LOS) with a Volume to Capacity Ratio of 0.95.
Environmental
The property is not within a Special Flood Hazard Area and does not appear to contain any wetlands.
Stormwater management will be reviewed by New Hanover County Engineering when a development
application is submitted to the County.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations
According to the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the site is classified as Community Mixed Use. This
placetype provides opportunity for lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services.
Commercial uses should be limited to office and retail spaces in carefully located areas where
neighborhood character will be enhanced, while recreation and school facilities are encourage
throughout.
Relevant Goals, Strategies, and Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan:
Goal I: Support business growth (Desired Outcome: A vibrant economy for New Hanover County Based on
business success.)
Strategy
C. Align county zoning ordinances to encourage targeted business in appropriate areas.
- 3 - 3ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 4 of 6
Guidelines
C.3 Develop strategies for encouraging office, retail, and other light intensity nonresidential uses
within existing residential areas to provide community level service.
The proposed rezoning of the property to B-2 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commercial
uses are appropriate within the Community Mixed Use placetype. Also, the B-2 district provides more
opportunities to provide a mixture of residential and commercial uses.
2008 Castle Hayne Community Plan
According to the Castle Hayne Community Plan, the site and commercial corridor is classified as
Commercial/Mixed Use. The plan encourages commercial/mixed use development to extend east along
Blossom Street as shown on the below Proposed Land Use Map. Therefore, this application is consistent
with the Castle Hayne Community Plan.
The subject property is identified with the blue star
- 3 - 4ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 5 of 6
REVIEW AND ACTION:
This application has been processed and reviewed per Section 110 – Amending the Ordinance.
Staff recommends approval of the application. Staff concludes that the application is consistent with the
2016 Comprehensive Plan and with the 2008 Castle Hayne Community Plan. B-2 zoning would provide
for additional opportunities for this property to be developed for commercial or mixed use purposes,
which is encouraged by both plans.
FIRST ACTION NEEDED:
Motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request
Motion to “table” the item in order to receive more information
Motion to recommend denial of the rezoning request
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 0.83 acres from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District as described
is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because
[Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment is consistent].
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public
health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or balancing
benefits and detriments.].
Conditions:
[List any agreed upon conditions]
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to recommend denial, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 0.83 acres from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District as described
is:
1. Not Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because
[Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment is not consistent].
2. Not reasonable or in the public interest because [Briefly explain why not. Factors may include
public health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or
balancing benefits and detriments.].
- 3 - 5ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-963, (11/16) Page 6 of 6
Staff Suggested Motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 0.83 acres from R-15, Residential District, to B-2, Highway Business District as described
is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because the
B-2 zoning district would allow for office and retail uses, which are appropriate within the
Community Mixed Use placetype. The application is also consistent with 2008 Castle Hayne
Community Plan, which identifies the property and surrounding corridor area to be developed for
commercial and mixed use purposes.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because it encourages commercial and mixed use
development along the Castle Hayne commercial corridor that may serve the area residents and
attract additional customers to support area businesses.
- 3 - 6ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
27
27
0
18
15
38
22 24
43
1
39
9
14
13
28
25
26
421023
41
16
40
1719
8
326
4
3
7
5
12
36
31
20
11
21
3334
29
35
37
44
2
30
ORANGE ST
CASTLE HAYNE RD
LYNN AVE
SYCAMORE AVE LINVILLE DR
BLOSSOM FERRY RD
PRIVATE
CASTLE AVE
VOLK DR
SHEARIN HILLS DR
MISHOE RD
MCCLURE CIR
BLOSSOM ST
VINE ST
MOSSY ROCK CT
MULBERRY ST
C A P E L A N DI N G R D
BLOSSOM ST
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-963
RA
B-2 R-15 R-10
ORANGE ST
CASTLE HAYNE RD
MCCLURE CIR
CASTLE AVE
LYNN AVE
BLOSSOM ST
Z-963
Case:
Zoning MapAmendment
Request:
Z-963
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
6016 & 6100Castle Hayne Rd R-15/Undeveloped B-2
Parcels within 500 Feet of Case Site
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
Case SiteNeighboring Parcels
ID Physical Address15915 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE26008 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE36004 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE46118 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE56118 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE66201 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE76200 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE06100 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE86016 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE96000 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE106000 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE116215 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE126200 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE136101 1 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE146117 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE156117 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE165916 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE1711 CASTLE AVE CASTLE HAYNE186001 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE195900 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE205 CASTLE AVE CASTLE HAYNE216011 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE225901 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE230 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE245908 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE256201 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE266129 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE270 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE286015 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE296000 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE306206 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE316208 BLOSSOM ST CASTLE HAYNE326205 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE336017 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE346010 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE355900 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE363 CASTLE AVE CASTLE HAYNE375900 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE386205 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE396107 CASTLE HAYNE RD CASTLE HAYNE406115 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE416115 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE426005 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE436101 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE446109 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE
-
4
-
1
IT
E
M
:
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
RA
R-15
I-2
R-10
B-2
O&I
ORANGE ST
CASTLE HAYNE RD
LYNN AVE
SYCAMORE AVE LINVILLE DR
BLOSSOM FERRY RD
PRIVATE
CASTLE AVE
VOLK DR
SHEARIN HILLS DR
MISHOE RD
MCCLURE CIR
BLOSSOM ST
VINE ST
MOSSY ROCK CT
MULBERRY ST
C A P E L A N DI N G R D
BLOSSOM ST
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-963
Case:
Zoning MapAmendment
Request:
Z-963
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
6016 & 6100Castle Hayne Rd R-15/Undeveloped B-2
Zoning Districts
SHOD
A-IARB-1 B-2
EDZDI-1I-2O&I
PDR-10 R-15R-20
R-20S R-7RA RFMU
SC
Incorporated Areas
Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD)Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD)See Section 55.1 of the Zoning OrdinanceCOD
-
5
-
1
IT
E
M
:
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
COMMUNITY MIXED USE GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
ORANGE ST
CASTLE HAYNE RD
LYNN AVE
SYCAMORE AVE LINVILLE DR
BLOSSOM FERRY RD
PRIVATE
CASTLE AVE
VOLK DR
SHEARIN HILLS DR
MISHOE RD
MCCLURE CIR
BLOSSOM ST
VINE ST
MOSSY ROCK CT
MULBERRY ST
C A P E L A N DI N G R D
BLOSSOM ST
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-963
Case:
Zoning MapAmendment
Request:
Z-963
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
6016 & 6100Castle Hayne Rd R-15/Undeveloped B-2
Placetypes
Commerce Zone
Emplyment Center
General Residential
Urban Mixed Use
Community Mixed Use
Rural Residential
Conservation
-
6
-
1
IT
E
M
:
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
ORANGE ST
CASTLE HAYNE RD
LYNN AVE
SYCAMORE AVE LINVILLE DR
BLOSSOM FERRY RD
PRIVATE
CASTLE AVE
VOLK DR
SHEARIN HILLS DR
MISHOE RD
MCCLURE CIR
BLOSSOM ST
VINE ST
MOSSY ROCK CT
MULBERRY ST
C A P E L A N DI N G R D
BLOSSOM ST
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-963
Case:
Zoning MapAmendment
Request:
Z-963
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
6016 & 6100Castle Hayne Rd R-15/Undeveloped B-2
Sewer Collector
Water Distribution Main
-
7
-
1
IT
E
M
:
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
- 8 - 1ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 2ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 1 of 3
04/14
Petitioner Information Property Owner(s)
If different than Petitioner
Subject Property
Name Owner Name Address
Company Owner Name 2 Parcel ID(s)
Address Address Area
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Existing Zoning and Use
Phone Phone
Email Email Land Classification
Application Tracking Information (Staff Only)
Case Number Date/Time received:Received by:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS
Application for
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
230 Government Center Drive Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-798-7165 phone
910-798-7053 fax
www.nhcgov.com
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a
pre-application conference prior to application submittal. Petitioners are requested to review the sections
of the Zoning Ordinance specific to zoning amendments prior to submission, and advised to contact
Planning Staff with any questions. The following sections of the Zoning Ordinance pertain specifically to
zoning amendments:
•Section 110: Amending the Ordinance
•Section 111: Petitions
•Section 112: Approval Process
Applications for zoning amendments must first be considered by the New Hanover County Planning
Board at a public hearing. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the County
Commissioners which will take final action on the permit application in a quasi-judicial public hearing.
Attendance at all public hearings is required. The public hearings will allow staff, the applicant,
proponents and opponents to testify in regards to the request. Unless otherwise published or announced,
Planning Board meetings are held on the first Thursday of each month at 6:00PM in the Commissioner's
Assembly Room at the Historic County Courthouse located at Third and Princess Streets, Wilmington,
North Carolina. All meeting dates and application deadlines are published on the New Hanover County
Planning website.
CindeeWolf CoastalCarolinaCarWash,LLC6016&6100CastleHayneRd
DesignSolutions 323213.22.2956&.23.3046
P.O.Box7221 1202NLakeParkBlvd 0.83ac.+/-
Wilmington,NC28406 CarolinaBeach,NC28428
910-620-2374
R-15/Vacant
cwolf@lobodemar.biz matt@secofconstruction.com
PrintForm
CommunityMixed-Use
910-458-7790/MattMurphy
- 9 - 1ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 2 of 3
04/14
CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONING
Requests for general rezonings do not consider a particular land use but rather all of the uses permitted in the
zoning district which is being requested for the subject property. Rezoning requests must be consistent with the
New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, and the applicant has the burden of proving
that the request is not consistent with the county’s adopted land use plan, zoning ordinance, reasonable, and in
the public’s interest. The applicant should explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how
the proposed zoning district satisfies these requirements. The applicant has the burden of proof and must
provide sufficient evidence in order for the required findings to be met.
You must explain in the space below how your request satisfies each of the following requirements (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
1.How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s Policies for Growth and Development?
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a
pre-application conference prior to application submittal. Applications must be reviewed by Planning
Staff for completeness prior to being officially accepted. Applications must be submitted to Planning
Staff at least twenty (20) working days before the Planning Board meeting at which the application is to
be considered. In order to allow time to process, fees and review for completeness, applications will not
be accepted after 5:00 PM on the deadline day. Once accepted, the Planning Board will consider the
application at the assigned meeting unless the applicant requests a continuance.
For all proposals, in addition to this application, the following supplemental information and materials are
required:
Required Information Applicant
Initial
Staff
Initial
Copy of the New Hanover County Tax Map, which delineates the property
requested for rezoning.
Legal description (by metes and bounds) of property requested for rezoning.
Copy of the subdivision map or recorded plat which delineates the property.
Any special requirements of the Ordinance (for example, Section 54.2 for Planned
Development District, Section 54.1 for Exceptional Design Zoning District, or
Section 54.3 for Riverfront Mixed Use District)
A report of the required public information meeting outlined in Section 111-2.1 (if
applicable)
Authority for Appointment of Agent Form (if applicable)
Fee -For petitions involving 5 acres or less, $500. For petitions involving greater
than 5 acres, $600
CAW
CAW
CAW
N/A
N/A
CAW
CAW
Policiesforgrowthandeconomicdevelopmentencouragecontinuedeffortstoattractandretainbusinesses.Sustainabilityof
theCountydependsonsensibleinfillandmaximizinguseoflandsalreadyaccessibletourbanservices.ThisareaofCastle
Haynehasbeendesignatedasappropriatefor"CommunityMixed-use"development.Extendingthecommercialzonethrough
thepropertiesandovertoBlossumStreetnegatesthecurrentsplitzoningandwillallowtheOwnerbetterflexibilityfor
improvementanddevelopmentalternatives.The2008CastleHayneLandUsestudyalsorecommendedthatthesubject
propertybezonedforbusinessfromtheCastleHayneRoadfrontageallthewaythroughtoBlossomStreet.
- 9 - 2ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 3 of 3
04/14
2.How would the requested zone change be consistent with the property’s classification on the Land
Classification Map?
3.What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
4.How will this change of zoning serve the public interest?
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County
Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the
next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the
newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation
to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee
schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required.
By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of
the zoning district for which I am applying. I understand that the existing official zoning map is
presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change
is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information
presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
__________________________________________ _______________________________________
Signature of Petitioner and/or Property Owner Print Name
CindeeWolf/DesignSolutions
TheCommunityMixed-useclassificationfocusesondevelopmentpatternsthatareamixtureofretail,officeandhousinguses.
Theproposedrezoningwouldjustextendtheexistingbusinessdistricttoalogicaldelineationandallowacomprehensive
developmentpatterntobeestablished.
Theownerimprovedthepropertybyremovingantiquatedmobilehomesfromtherearareainhopesofreplacingthemwith
newerresidentialunits.However,thehistoricdensitywasnolongerpermittedbecausezoiningenforcementinterpretedthat
themobilehomeparkusehadbeenformallyabandoned.TheOwnertriedtoappealthatinterpretation,butitwasdenied.this
leavesthepropertyrelativelyunusablebecauseconventionalR-15residentialdevelopmentwouldbegenerallyunattractiveto
therearofcommercialuses.ZoningforbusinessbacktoBlossomStreetwouldcreatealogicalseparationandtransition
betweentheneighborhoodstotheeastandthebusyCastleHayneRoadcorridor.
Thisrezoningwillallowthecompleteareaofthesubjectpropertiestobedevelopedasawhole,andaddtothecentralbusiness
districtofCastleHayne.Itwillgivetheownermoreflexibilityfordevelopment.BlossomStreetwouldprovidetheseparationto
themoreresidentialusestotheEast.Anydevelopmentwouldberequiredtoprovidevisualscreeningandbufferingtomitigate
anyimpactstothoseresidencesfromtherearofthecommercialuse.
- 9 - 3ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 4ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
-
9
-
5
IT
E
M
:
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
Legal Description for
Rezoning of part of 6016 & 6100 Castle Hayne Road
Beginning at a point that is located South 80050’00” East, 215.00 feet from a point in the eastern
boundary of Castle Hayne Road (S.R. 2812 / NC Hwy. 133 / U.S. Hwy. 117), a 100’ public right‐of‐way;
said reference point being at the northwestern corner of “Tract 2 – Coastal Carolina Car Wash,” on a plat
recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 55, at Page 327; and
running thence from the point of beginning:
South 80050’00” East, 115.00 feet to a point; thence
South 09010’00” West, 314.00 feet to a point; thence
North 80050’00” West, 115.00 feet to a point; thence
North 09010’00” East, 314.00 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 36,110 square feet, or
0.83 acres, more or less.
- 9 - 6ITEM: 2
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 3, 2016
REGULAR
ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Ben Andrea, Current Planning & Zoning Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z-964, 11/16) – Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner,
Amber Sun, LLC, to rezone 5.00 acres located at 5000 Blue Clay Road from (CUD) I-1, Conditional
Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I, Conditional Office and Institutional District, in order to
allow for office and school uses within the existing building located on the property, and to expand the
existing parking lot.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The subject property consists of 5 acres located at 5000 Blue Clay Road. When zoning was initially applied
to this area in 1972, the subject property and surrounding area were zoned R-15. The property has a history
of being used for non-residential purposes. Prior to the establishment of zoning, the property was used as a
seafood restaurant, and on occasion, as a night club. The restaurant suffered extensive fire damage in the
mid-1980s resulting in its closure.
In 1997, the property was rezoned to a Conditional Use Light Industrial District in order to allow for the
development of offices for engineering consulting services and general contractors (Z-598). Currently, an
office building and parking lot exist on the property.
StreetSafe, a not-for-profit organization which provides educational services promoting safe driving
practices, began to operate in the building in 2015. Recently, the organization sought to expand the parking
lot in order to provide a larger area for conducting the driving classes. During this time, it was discovered
that this use did not comply with the standards of the Conditional Use District, which limited the allowable
uses to “geological and engineering services, special trade and general contractors”. This rezoning
application, if approved, would modify the zoning district to permit technical schools, including StreetSafe,
on the property. The surrounding area is zoned R-15 and consists of low density single-family housing.
The proposed development will generate 22 trips in the AM peak, and 19 trips in the PM peak. Because the
trips do not exceed 100 in the peak hours, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required to be completed.
According to the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the site is classified as General Residential. This
placetype provides opportunity for lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services.
Commercial uses should be limited to office and retail spaces in carefully located areas where neighborhood
character will be enhanced, while recreation and school facilities are encourage throughout.
The proposal of allowing office and school uses within the existing building on the property is consistent
with the General Residential placetype. Further, the proposed O&I district is more appropriate within this
placetype, and within residential areas, than the current light industrial zoning.
ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Attract and retain new and expanding businesses
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval and suggest the following motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 5.00 acres from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I,
Conditional Office and Institutional District as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because office and
institutional uses that enhance neighborhood character are appropriate within the General Residential
placetype.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed office and institutional uses will provide
additional high quality educational opportunities for the residents of New Hanover County, and because the
proposal removes industrial zoning from an area predominantly zoned for residential purposes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Z-964 Script
Z-964 Petition Summary
Z-964 Staff Summary
Z-964 Neighborhood Map
Z-964 Zoning Map
Z-964 Comp Plan Map
Z-964 Water Sewer Map
Applicant Materials Cover Sheet
Z-964 Application
Proposed Site Plan Cover Sheet
Z-964 Proposed Site Plan
ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
SCRIPT FOR Conditional Zoning District Application (Z-964, 11/16)
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Amber Sun, LLC, to rezone 5.00
acres located at 5000 Blue Clay Road from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District,
to (CZD) O&I, Conditional Office and Institutional District, in order to allow for office and school
uses within the existing building located on the property, and to expand the existing parking
lot.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5
minutes for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the Public Hearing
4. Board discussion
5. At this time, you may ask to either continue the application to a future meeting, or to proceed
with this Board deciding whether to recommend approval or denial of the application.
What do you wish to do?
6. Vote on the conditional zoning district application. The motion should include a statement
saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why it is, or is not,
reasonable and in the public interest.
Staff Suggested Motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a
zoning map amendment of 5.00 acres from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial
District, to (CZD) O&I, Conditional Office and Institutional District as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
because office and institutional uses that enhance neighborhood character are
appropriate within the General Residential placetype.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed office and institutional uses
will provide additional high quality educational opportunities for the residents of New
Hanover County, and because the proposal removes industrial zoning from an area
predominantly zoned for residential purposes.
- 1 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, 11/16 Page 1 of 1
Case Z-964, (11/16)
Rezone from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I, Conditional Office and
Institutional District
Petition Summary Data
Parcel Location & Acreage: 5000 Blue Clay Road, 5.00 acres
Petitioner/Owner: Cindee Wolf, Design Solutions (Applicant)
Amber Sun, LLC (Owner)
Existing Land Use: Office Building
Zoning History: July 7, 1982 - Initially zoned R-15 via Area 8A
April 7, 1997 – Rezoned to (CUD) I-1 in order to allow for an engineering
consulting business.
Land Classification: General Residential
Water Type: Public
Sewer Type: Septic
Recreation Area: Northern Regional Park
Access: Blue Clay Road (SR 2181)
Fire District: New Hanover County North
Watershed & Water Quality
Classification: Prince George Creek (C:Sw)
Conservation/Historic/
Archaeological Resources: There are no known conservation, historic, or archaeological resources
on the property.
Soils and Septic Suitability: Kenansville Fine Sand (Ke) – Class I: Suitable/Slight Limitation
Stallings Fine Sand (St) – Class II: Moderate Limitation
Leon Soil (Le) – Class III: Severe Limitation
Murville Fine Sand (Mu) – Class III: Severe Limitation
Johnston Soil – Class IV: Unsuitable
Schools: Castle Hayne Elementary, Eaton Elmentary, Holly Shelter Middle, Laney
High
- 2 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 1 of 6
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION
CASE: Z-964, 11/16
PETITIONER: Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions, applicant
Amber Sun LLC, property owner
REQUEST: Rezone from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I, Conditional
Office and Institutional District
ACREAGE: 5.00 acres
LOCATION: 5000 Blue Clay Road
PID: R01800-003-016-000
2016 COMP PLAN PLACE TYPE: General Residential
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Existing Zoning and Land Uses
The subject property consists of 5 acres located at 5000 Blue Clay Road. When zoning was initially applied
to this area in 1972, the subject property and surrounding area were zoned R-15. The property has a
history of being used for non-residential purposes. Prior to the establishment of zoning, the property was
used as a seafood restaurant, and on occasion, as a night club. The restaurant suffered extensive fire
damage in the mid-1980s resulting in its closure.
In 1997, the property was rezoned to a Conditional Use Light Industrial District in order to allow for the
development of offices for engineering consulting services and general contractors (Z-598). Currently, an
office building and parking lot exist on the property.
StreetSafe, a not-for-profit organization which provides educational services promoting safe driving
practices, began to operate in the building in 2015. Recently the organization sought to expand the
parking lot in order to provide a larger area for conducting the driving classes. It was then discovered that
- 3 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 2 of 6
this use did not comply with the standards of the Conditional Use District, which limited the allowable
uses to “geological and engineering services, special trade and general contractors”. This rezoning
application, if approved, would modify the zoning district to permit technical schools, including StreetSafe,
on the property. The surrounding area is zoned R-15 and consists of low density single-family housing.
Existing Site Conditions
A 7,549 square foot building and parking lot have been constructed on the southern portion of the
property, comprising approximately of one acre. The remaining portions of the property are undeveloped
and wooded.
Community Services
Water and Sewer:
The development is currently connected to public water (CFPUA). Wastewater is treated with a private
septic system.
Fire Protection:
The property is served by New Hanover County Fire Services and located in the New Hanover County
North Fire District.
Schools:
The property is located within the school districts for Castle Hayne Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Holly
Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools; however the proposed use will not have an impact on the school
system.
Conservation, Historic, and Archaeological Resources
The subject property does not host any known conservation, historic, or archaeological resources.
PETITIONER’S REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking to rezone 5.00 acres currently zoned (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial
District, to (CZD) O&I, Conditional Office and Institutional District, in order to allow for office and
- 3 - 2ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 3 of 6
professional/technical school uses within the existing building located on the property, and to expand the
existing paved area used for driver training courses.
STAFF POSITION:
Zoning Ordinance Considerations
The purpose of the Office and Institutional District is to provide areas where institutional uses,
professional office uses and other uses compatible to uses of an office or institutional nature shall be
encouraged to locate and to provide protection for this type land use from encroachment by other less
desirable uses. The district's principal means of ingress and egress shall be along collector roads, minor
arterials, and/or major arterials as designated on the County's Thoroughfare Classification Plan.
A conceptual site plan is included as part of the application and is shown below. If this application is
approved, the property must be developed in accordance with the site plan. The applicant is proposing
to utilize the existing building for office and educational uses, and to expand the existing paved area used
for driver training courses.
Conceptual Site Plan
Further, the proposed development is subject to the County’s site plan/building permit review
process. The process includes reviewing the plan with the technical standards of the County’s
development ordinances, including landscaping, buffering, and stormwater requirements. A fully opaque
buffer is required along the property lines that adjoin residential uses and zoning. As currently shown,
the site plan complies with the Zoning Ordinance.
Transportation
The proposed development will generate 22 trips in the AM peak, and 19 trips in the PM peak. Because
the trips do not exceed 100 in the peak hours, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required to be
completed.
- 3 - 3ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 4 of 6
The Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) conducted a traffic count at the 5000 block
of Blue Clay Road on October 12, 2016. The count yielded an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1,825
trips. This portion of Blue Clay Road has a design capacity of 9,400 daily trips, and therefore it is classified
as having an “A” Level of Service (LOS) with a Volume to Capacity Ratio of 0.19.
Environmental
The northern undeveloped portion of the property is located within an AE Special Flood Hazard Area and
AE Floodway. Stormwater management will be reviewed by New Hanover County Engineering.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations
According to the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the site is classified as General Residential. This
placetype provides opportunity for lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services.
Commercial uses should be limited to office and retail spaces in carefully located areas where
neighborhood character will be enhanced, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged
throughout.
Relevant Goals, Strategies, and Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan:
Goal I: Support business growth (Desired Outcome: A vibrant economy for New Hanover County Based on
business success.)
Strategy
C. Align county zoning ordinances to encourage targeted business in appropriate areas.
Guidelines
C.3 Develop strategies for encouraging office, retail, and other light intensity nonresidential uses
within existing residential areas to provide community level service.
Goal XIV: Actively promote high quality education and diverse cultural opportunities for New Hanover
County residents and visitors. (Desired Outcome: High quality education and diverse opportunities that
sustain the economic vitality of our community and enrich the lives and future residents.)
The proposal to allow office and school uses within the existing building on the property is consistent with
the General Residential placetype. Further, the proposed O&I district is more appropriate within this
placetype, and within residential areas, than the current light industrial zoning.
- 3 - 4ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 5 of 6
REVIEW AND ACTION:
This request is being facilitated by Section 55.3 – Conditional Zoning District of the County’s Zoning
Ordinance, and has been processed and reviewed per Section 110 – Amending the Ordinance. A
community meeting was held on Thursday, September 29th, 2016 in accordance with the requirements
for such an application. Nobody from the public attended the meeting. The applicant has provided a
summary of the meeting which is included in the applicaton.
Staff recommends approval of the application. Staff concludes that the application is consistent with the
2016 Comprehensive Plan and with the Zoning Ordinance. Commercial, office, and school uses that
enhance neighborhood character are appropriate within the General Residential placetype. The proposed
uses do not generate a substantial amount of traffic and will provide additional educational opportunities
for the area’s residents.
FIRST ACTION NEEDED:
Motion to recommend approval of the rezoning request
Motion to “table” the item in order to receive more information
Motion to recommend denial of the rezoning request
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 5.00 acres from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I,
Conditional Office and Institutional District as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and 2016
Comprehensive Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the
amendment is consistent].
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public
health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or balancing
benefits and detriments.].
Conditions:
[List any agreed upon conditions]
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to recommend denial, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 5.00 acres from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I, Office and
Institutional District as described is:
1. Not Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the
2016 Comprehensive Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the
amendment is not consistent].
- 3 - 5ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Z-964, (11/16) Page 6 of 6
2. Not reasonable or in the public interest because [Briefly explain why not. Factors may include
public health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or
balancing benefits and detriments.].
Staff Suggested Motion:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Planning Board finds that this application for a zoning map
amendment of 5.00 acres from (CUD) I-1, Conditional Use Light Industrial District, to (CZD) O&I,
Conditional Office and Institutional District as described is:
1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan because office
and institutional uses that enhance neighborhood character are appropriate within the General
Residential placetype.
2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed office and institutional uses will
provide additional high quality educational opportunities for the residents of New Hanover
County, and because the proposal removes industrial zoning from an area predominantly zoned
for residential purposes.
- 3 - 6ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
5
11
13
13
17
0
14
7
16
9
10
1
18
8
13
3
4
15
6
2
12
I-
4
0
E
I-
4
0
W
BLUE CLAY RD
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
WOODHAVEN DR
BROOKDALE DR
GLAZIER RD
MILLHOUSE RD
P
R
O
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
L
N
GILBERT CURRY DR
HERMITAGE DR
B A L L A R D D R
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
CONWAY RD
PRIVATE
B
L
U
E
C
L
A
Y
R
D
PRIVATE
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-964
R-15
CUD I-1
BLUE CLAY RD
GILBERT CURRY DR Z-964
Case:
Conditional ZoningDistrict
Request:
Z-964
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
5000 Blue Clay Rd (CUD) I-1/Schools & Offices (CZD) O&I/Schools & Offices
Parcels within 500 Feet of Case Site
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
Case SiteNeighboring Parcels
ID Physical Address14929 BLUE CLAY RD05000 BLUE CLAY RD24917 BLUE CLAY RD35124 BLUE CLAY RD44916 BLUE CLAY RD54908 BLUE CLAY RD65110 BLUE CLAY RD75116 BLUE CLAY RD84911 BLUE CLAY RD95021 BLUE CLAY RD105025 BLUE CLAY RD114908 BLUE CLAY RD124909 BLUE CLAY RD13200 BROOKDALE DR145001 BLUE CLAY RD155008 BLUE CLAY RD16106 GILBERT CURRY DR174915 BLUE CLAY RD185108 BLUE CLAY RD
-
4
-
1
IT
E
M
:
3
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
R-15
R-10
B-2
I-2
CUD I-1
O&I
I-
4
0
E
I-
4
0
W
BLUE CLAY RD
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
WOODHAVEN DR
BROOKDALE DR
GLAZIER RD
MILLHOUSE RD
P
R
O
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
L
N
GILBERT CURRY DR
HERMITAGE DR
B A L L A R D D R
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
CONWAY RD
PRIVATE
B
L
U
E
C
L
A
Y
R
D
PRIVATE
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-964
Case:
Conditional ZoningDistrict
Request:
Z-964
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
5000 Blue Clay Rd (CUD) I-1/Schools & Offices (CZD) O&I/Schoolsl & Offices
Placetypes
Commerce Zone
Emplyment Center
General Residential
Urban Mixed Use
Community Mixed Use
Rural Residential
Conservation Zoning Districts
SHOD
A-IAR
B-1 B-2
EDZDI-1I-2O&I
PDR-10 R-15R-20
R-20S R-7RA RFMU
SC
Incorporated Areas
Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD)Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD)See Section 55.1 of the Zoning OrdinanceCOD
-
5
-
1
IT
E
M
:
3
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
URBAN MIXED USE
EMPLOYMENT CENTER
I-
4
0
E
I-
4
0
W
BLUE CLAY RD
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
WOODHAVEN DR
BROOKDALE DR
GLAZIER RD
MILLHOUSE RD
P
R
O
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
L
N
GILBERT CURRY DR
HERMITAGE DR
B A L L A R D D R
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
CONWAY RD
PRIVATE
B
L
U
E
C
L
A
Y
R
D
PRIVATE
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-964
Case:
Conditional ZoningDistrict
Request:
Z-964
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
5000 Blue Clay Rd (CUD) I-1/Schools & Offices (CZD) O&I/Schools & Offices
Placetypes
Commerce Zone
Emplyment Center
General Residential
Urban Mixed Use
Community Mixed Use
Rural Residential
Conservation
-
6
-
1
IT
E
M
:
3
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
I-
4
0
E
I-
4
0
W
BLUE CLAY RD
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
WOODHAVEN DR
BROOKDALE DR
GLAZIER RD
MILLHOUSE RD
P
R
O
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
L
N
GILBERT CURRY DR
HERMITAGE DR
B A L L A R D D R
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
CONWAY RD
PRIVATE
B
L
U
E
C
L
A
Y
R
D
PRIVATE
1,000 Feet®HNC
Z-964
Case:
Rezoning
Request:
Z-964
Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Z oning:Site Address:
5000 Blue Clay Rd (CUD) I-1/Schools and Offices (CZD) O&I/School & Offices
Placetypes
Commerce Zone
Emplyment Center
General Residential
Urban Mixed Use
Community Mixed Use
Rural Residential
Conservation
Sewer Collector
Water Distribution Main
-
7
-
1
IT
E
M
:
3
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
- 8 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 8 - 2ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 1 of 3
04/14
Petitioner Information Property Owner(s)
If different than Petitioner
Subject Property
Name Owner Name Address
Company Owner Name 2 Parcel ID(s)
Address Address Area
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Existing Zoning and Use
Phone Phone Proposed Use
Email Email Land Classification
Application Tracking Information (Staff Only)
Case Number Date/Time received:Received by:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING & INSPECTIONS
Application for
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT T
230 Government Center Drive Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-798-7165 phone
910-798-7053 fax
www.nhcgov.com
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a
pre-application conference prior to application submittal. Petitioners are requested to review the sections
of the Zoning Ordinance specific to zoning amendments and conditional zoning districts prior to
submission, and advised to contact Planning Staff with any questions. The following sections of the
Zoning Ordinance pertain specifically to zoning amendments and conditional zoning districts:
•Section 55.3: Conditional Zoning Districts
•Section 110: Amending the Ordinance
•Section 111: Petitions
•Section 112: Approval Process
Applications for zoning amendments must first be considered by the New Hanover County Planning
Board at a public hearing. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the County
Commissioners which will take final action on the permit application in a quasi-judicial public hearing.
Attendance at all public hearings is required. The public hearings will allow staff, the applicant,
proponents and opponents to testify in regards to the request. Unless otherwise published or announced,
Planning Board meetings are held on the first Thursday of each month at 6:00PM in the Commissioner's
Assembly Room at the Historic County Courthouse located at Third and Princess Streets, Wilmington,
North Carolina. All meeting dates and application deadlines are published on the New Hanover County
Planning website.
CindeeWolfAmberSun,L.L.C.5000BlueClayRoad
DesignSolutions 324109.05.3818
POBox72215000BlueClayRoad 5.00ac.+/-
Wilmington,NC28406CatleHayne,NC28429I-1(CUD)School&Offices
910-620-2374 910-262-6757/DougDarrell O&I(CZD)School&Offices
cwolf@lobodemar.bizdoug@streetsafeus.com GeneralResidencial
PrintForm
- 9 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 2 of 3
04/14
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a
pre-application conference prior to application submittal. Applications must be reviewed by Planning
Staff for completeness prior to being officially accepted. Applications must be submitted to Planning
Staff at least twenty (20) working days before the Planning Board meeting at which the application is to
be considered. In order to allow time to process, fees and review for completeness, applications will not
be accepted after 5:00 PM on the deadline day. Once accepted, the Planning Board will consider the
application at the assigned meeting unless the applicant requests a continuance.
For all proposals, in addition to this application, the following supplemental information and materials are
required:
Required Information Applicant
Initial
Staff
Initial
Copy of the New Hanover County Tax Map, which delineates the property
requested for rezoning.
Legal description (by metes and bounds) of property requested for rezoning.
Copy of the subdivision map or recorded plat which delineates the property.
Site Plan (8-24x36 copies for Planning Board; 8-24x36 copies for Commissioners)
x Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
x Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential
uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be
occupied by each structure and/or subdivided boundaries. For non-
residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of
each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose
for which it will be used.
x Development schedule including proposed phasing.
x Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local
traffic near the tract, proposed right-of-way dedication, plans for access to
and from the tract, location, width and right-of-way for internal streets and
location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas.
x All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks,
rights-of-way, buffering and signage
x The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable
x Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of
the Zoning Ordinance
x Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding
General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be
regulated by State law or Local Ordinance.
x Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change
(Ref. Article VII, as applicable)
A report of the required public information meeting outlined in Section 111-2.1.
Authority for Appointment of Agent Form (if applicable)
Fee -For petitions involving 5 acres or less, $600. For petitions involving greater
than 5 acres, $700
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
- 9 - 2ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Page 3 of 3
04/14
CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONING
Conditional Use District Zoning is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective but for which
none of the general zoning classifications which would allow that use are acceptable. The applicant should
explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed use satisfies these requirements.
The applicant has the burden of proof and must provide sufficient evidence in order for the required findings to
be met.
You must explain in the space below how your request satisfies each of the following requirements (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
1.How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s Policies for Growth and Development?
2.How would the requested zone change be consistent with the property’s classification on the Land
Classification Map?
3.What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
4.List proposed conditions and restrictions that would mitigate the impacts of the proposed use(s).
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County
Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the
next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the
newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation
to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee
schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required.
By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of
the Conditional Use District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing official
zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this
requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all
information presented in this application is accurate tothe best of my knowledge, information, and
belief.
__________________________________________ _______________________________________
Signature of Petitioner and/or Property Owner Print Name
CynthiaWolf/DesignSolutions
Policiesforgrowthencouragecontinuedeffortstoattract&retainbusinesses.Theexistingpropertyuseisnon-conforming.
Therezoningwouldbringtheuseintoconformanceandallowittoexpand.Theconditionaldistrictprocessallowsthistooccur
andstillprotectthesurroundingresidentialuses.
Thesiteisina"GeneralResidential"landclassification.Thisisaplace-typethatshouldbelimitedtoofficeandlimited
commercialuses.Thechangewouldbeconsideredadown-zonefromthemuchmoreintensiveindustrialzonecurrently
existingandmoreappropriatetothenewplanclassification.
Theenvironmentalcontractorthatonceoccupiedthepropertyvacatedseveralyearsago.Theexistinguseasatechnicalschool
isconsiderednon-conformingandtherebyisnotpermittedtomakeimprovementsorexpand.
Thetripgenerationfortheexistinguseasadrivingsafetyschoolsandsomeprofessionalofficeshasaverylowtripgeneration.
Bufferyardplantingswillprovidevisual&noisescreeningtomitigateanyimpactstotheresidentialusestotheSouth.The
rezoningwouldmaximizetheeffectivenessofthecurrentuse,butnotappreciablychangethecurrentconditions.
- 9 - 3ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 4ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 5ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
Legal Description for
Conditional District Rezoning
5000 Blue Clay Road
Beginning at an iron pipe in the eastern boundary of Blue Clay Road (S.R. 2181), a 60’ public
right‐of‐way; said point being located perpendicular to a point in the road centerline that is
approximately 634 feet from its intersection with the centerline of Brookdale Drive (S.R. 2258),
a 60’ public right‐of way; and running thence from said point of beginning:
South 53032’19” East, 249.11 feet to a point; thence
South 24053’06” West, 878.44 feet to a point; thence
North 59014’15” West, 106.55 feet to a point; thence
North 61028’08” West, 235.84 feet to a point in the eastern boundary of Blue Clay Road; thence
with that right‐of‐way,
North 31003’47” East, 291.93 feet to a point; thence
South 58023’22” East, 203.72 feet to a point; thence
North 21032’28” East, 109.77 feet to a point; thence
North 15059’15” East, 153.37 feet to a point; thence
North 63019’45” West, 148.41 feet to a point in the eastern boundary of Blue Clay Road; thence
with that right‐of‐way,
North 31021’32” East, 372.79 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 5.00 acres,
more or less.
- 9 - 6ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 7ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Location: 5000 Blue Clay Road
Proposed Zoning: Conditional Zoning District / (CZD) O&I
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning
application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class
mail, and provided to the Planning Dept. for notice of the Sunshine List on September 16, 2016.
A copy of the written notice is also attached.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: Thursday, September 29, 2016,
6:00 - 6:30 p.m.; at the site / 5000 Blue Clay Road, Castle Hayne.
The persons in attendance at the meeting were: No one attended other than the NHCo
Representative – Brad Schuler.
The following issues were discussed at the meeting: N/A
As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: None
Date: October 5, 2016
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
- 9 - 8ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
OwnerOwner AddrOwner City
ALLSBROOK ROBERT DOUGLAS142 BRADLEY PINES RD WILMINGTON, NC 28403
AMBER SUN LLC5008 CASTLE LAKES RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
BONHAM L V LIFE ESTATE4917 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
CARTER WALTER C SR5200 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
CHINN LEONARD D JOYCE A REV LIV TR1817 FUTCH CREEK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411
CORPORATION FOR INQUIRY INC2525 WONDER WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28401
FLESHER LARRY T5110 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
GREEN JERRY THOMAS5116 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
HARRISON CYNTHIA LYNAE4911 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
KENNEDY GREGORY L5021 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
KENNEDY JAMES EDWARD5025 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
MANASSAS INC6955 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28411
MCRAE JOHN HENRY1538 JESSUP AVE BRONX, NY 10452
MYERS JERRY GENERATION SKIP TRST121 COLUMBIA ST N CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514
NICHOLS KENNETH W DORIS5001 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
POSTEMA KEEGAN P5008 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
RODRIGUEZ GILBERTO T BARBARA J106 GILBERT CURRY DR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
TADLOCK DONALD JENEANE C2116 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401
WATSON DEBORAH FLESHER ETAL5108 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
- 9 - 9ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 10ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Transmittal
September 16, 2016
To: Adjacent Property Owners
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: Street Safe Driving Training Facility
5000 Blue Clay Road
The referenced property is within 500 feet of yours, and is being used as a technical school for
promoting safe driving. StreetSafe is a not-for-profit program with a mission to teach young and
inexperienced drivers to become safer and more responsible on the road.
This facility was used as an environmental contractor’s office and testing labs for many years.
These uses required an industrial zoning designation (I-1/CUD), which was approved back in the
late 1990’s. The current use would require a modification of that existing zoning. As a school,
the most appropriate designation would be Office & Institutional (O&I), and we will be seeking a
Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County.
A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with
specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially,
this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed.
An exhibit of the site is attached. The only proposed change to the existing layout is the
expansion of the pavement used for driver training.
The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of
the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties, prior to submittal. This provides
neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered
concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts.
A meeting will be held on Thursday, September 29th, at the facility, 5000 Blue Clay Road, 6:00 –
6:30 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 620-2374, or
email cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset
to the community.
- 9 - 11ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 12ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 9 - 13ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
- 10 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 10 - 2ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
- 11 - 1ITEM: 3
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 3, 2016
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER(S):
CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Sam Burgess, Senior Planner; and Ben Andrea, Current Planning/Zoning
Supervisor
SUBJECT:
TRC Report for September-October 2016
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The Technical Review Committee met once during the month of September and twice in October to review
three site plans. The full report is included in the agenda package.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth and Economic Development
• Implement plans for land use, economic development, infrastructure and environmental programs
• Understand and act on citizen needs
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hear report. No action required.
ATTACHMENTS:
Sept-Oct 2016 TRC Report Package
ITEM: 4
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2016 NHC TRC REPORT 1
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2016
New Hanover County’s Technical Review Committee (TRC) met once in September and twice during the
month of October and reviewed three (3) performance site plans.
1) Whiskey – Navajo Development (Performance Plan – continued from Sept 21 meeting)
The Whiskey-Navajo Development is located near the central portion of our jurisdiction and is
classified as General Residential on the County’s adopted 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The 170-unit
project consisting of 56 townhomes, 26 duplexes, (88 single family lots) is near the 5600 block of
South College Road, east side.
Site Plan Attributes
- Zoning: R-15 Residential
- Water Service: Public (CFPUA)
- Sewer Service: Public (CFPUA)
- Road System: Public
- Acreage: 71.35
- Access: Navaho Trail & Mohican Trail (public roads)
- TIA: Yes
- Conservation Resources: Yes
In a vote of 5-0, the TRC approved the Whiskey-Navajo Development for 170 units with the
following conditions:
1) No gates, traffic calming devices, or on-street parking unless reviewed by TRC and NCDOT.
2) Off-site road improvements as recommended by the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA).
3) Design of a T-intersection at the entrance to Navajo Trail to improve site distance
requirements by NCDOT.
4) The creation of a sidewalk from the entrance to Mohican Trail into the project.
2) Beau Rivage Apartments (Performance Extension Request)
Beau Rivage Apartments is located in the south central portion of our jurisdiction and is classified
as General Residential on the County’s adopted 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The 120-unit project
is located near the 6200 block of Carolina Beach Road, west side. The applicant for the project
requested a preliminary one-year extension to the plan based on nominal work completed.
Site Plan Attributes
- Zoning: R-15 Residential
- Water Service: Private (Aqua of North Carolina)
- Sewer Service: Private (Aqua of North Carolina)
- Road System: Private
- Access: Carolina Beach Road
- TIA: No
- Conservation Resources: No
- 1 - 1ITEM: 4
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2016 NHC TRC REPORT 2
In a vote of 5-0, the TRC approved the preliminary extension request for Beau Rivage Apartments
with conditions (5) stated from the original approval in November, 2014.
3) 7230 Carolina Beach Road (Performance Plan)
7230 Carolina Beach Road is located in the southern portion of our jurisdiction and is classified
as General Residential on the County’s adopted 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The 18 lot project is
located near the 7200 block of Carolina Beach Road, west side.
Site Plan Attributes
- Zoning: R-15 Residential
- Water Service: Private (Aqua of North Carolina)
- Sewer Service: Private (Aqua of North Carolina)
- Road System: Private
- Access: Carolina Beach Road
- TIA: No
- Conservation Resources: Yes
In a vote of 5-0, the TRC approved 7230 Carolina Beach Road with the following conditions:
1) No gates, traffic calming devices, or on-street parking permitted unless reviewed by the
County’s TRC.
2) A waiver request by the applicant was accepted for reducing the private road right-of-way
width from 45’ to 40’ with 22’ of pavement and 2’ of valley curb based on the nature of
the elongated tract of land and desire to have larger lots. In lieu of the waiver to remove
the sidewalk requirement, the TRC voted to have a 5’ thermoplastic strip be installed along
the paved road edge (one side) to provide a safe haven for children and residents to the
entrance with Carolina Beach Road.
3) A NCDOT Driveway permit will be required prior to final plat approval.
4) A wall/fence will be constructed along the southern boundary of the project (applicant
request).
5) Road stubs will be paved prior to final plat approval to the project boundary to meet road
inter-connectivity requirements. If for topo/grades impair the construction of the road
stubs to the property boundary, signage will be placed indicating that the stubs will be
constructed in the future along with posting a bond.
6) A field check for conservation resources and class IV soils will be verified by Planning staff
within seven (7) business days. A modified performance residential application may
require modification with the subtraction of class IV soils.
- 1 - 2ITEM: 4
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
OCTOBER 2016
FOR
PROJECT # 16289.PE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
5601 SOUTH COLLEGE ROAD
PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL
WHISKEY-NAVAJO
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET INDEX
SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE
COVER SHEET
SITE PLAN
C-2.1TREE SURVEY
C-2.0
Know what's
R
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY
CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED
EXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT
OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM
APPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
CONTACT THESE UTILITIES
DEVELOPER:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT & CIVIL ENGINEER:
LAND SURVEYOR :
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LATEST NEW HANOVER COUNTY ORDINANCES AND STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL.
Signature:
Name and Title:
Date:
Registration Number:
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE CURRENT DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY AND
THAT UPON RECEIPT OF "AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT" ANY CLEARING, GRADING,
CONSTRUCTION, OR DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND RULES OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY, THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENCIES WHICH
ARE HEREBY PART OF THIS PLAN. AS THE DEVELOPER, WE ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED
FACILITIES. WE WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO TRANSFER THIS RESPONSIBILITY WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY.
Signature:
Name and Title:
Date:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
WHISKEY-NAVAJO DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC
P.O. Box 3649, Wilmington, NC 28406
PROPERTY OWNER:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY-
C-3.0UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE PLAN
PRIVATE ROADS CERTIFICATE
I, __________________________ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
AS DEPICTED ON SUBDIVISION PLAT______________ HAS BEEN DESIGNED,
INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 52-4
OF THE OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND ALL
APPLICABLE NEW HANOVER COUNTY CODES PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR ALL OR A PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BY CERTIFYING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS DRIVEWAY AS PRIVATE...THERE
ARE NO GUARANTEES OR ASSURANCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SAID ROADS BY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION.
__________________________________________________________
CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERDATE
PRIVATE ROADS CERTIFICATION
I (WE) THE DEVELOPERS OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY UNDERSTAND THAT THE
DRIVEWAY ACCESSING THE TOWNHOUSE PORTION OF SAID SUBDIVISION IS
DESIGNATED PRIVATE. I UNDERSTAND THAT OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE
OF THE DRIVEWAY WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER UNTIL
SUCH TIME THAT THE DEVELOPER DESIGNATES THE RESPONSIBILITY TO THE
PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. RESPONSIBILITIES MUST BE ACCEPTED BY
THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROPERTY
OWNER COVENANTS FOR SAID SUBDIVISION. THE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY IN SAID
SUBDIVISION IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 52-4 OF
THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND ALL APPLICABLE
COUNTY CODES WHICH INCLUDES THE DESIGN, INSTALLATION, INSPECTION,
AND APPROVAL BY A LICENSED ENGINEER (P.E.) RECOGNIZED IN THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR ALL OR A PORTION OF
THE SUBDIVISION. IF ALL OR A PORTION OF THE ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
SYSTEM WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS BONDED THROUGH A SURETY,
PERFORMANCE BOND, OR CASH ESCROW, NO BOND SHALL BE RELEASED
UNTIL ALL ROAD CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETE AND
CERTIFIED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
IT SHALL BE DISCLOSED TO THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER OF A LOT OR LOTS
WITHIN A SUBDIVISION THAT DRIVEWAY MAINTENANCE SHALL RUN THROUGH
THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION IN PERPETUITY AFTER ACCEPTANCE
FROM THE DEVELOPER UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE DRIVEWAY IS RE-PLATTED
AS A PUBLICLY DESIGNATED ROAD AND TAKEN OVER FOR MAINTENANCE
THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT)
OR APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
_____________________________________________________
SIGNATURE OF OWNER(S)DATE
CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS
I (WE) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT NEITHER THE STATE NOR THE COUNTY SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ANY STREETS, PARKS, DRAINAGE, OPEN
SPACE OR OTHER AREAS WHICH ARE DESIGNATED FOR PRIVATE USE. I (WE)
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT PRIOR TO CONTRACTING WITH A PROSPECTIVE BUYER, I
SHALL GIVE THE BUYER A WRITTEN STATEMENT WHICH DISCLOSES THE
EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF SUCH PRIVATE AREAS AND SPECIFIES THE
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SAME. WHEN APPLICABLE, THE
STATEMENT SHALL DISCLOSE THAT THE DRIVEWAY WILL NOT BE
CONSTRUCTED TO MINIMUM STANDARDS SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THEIR
INCLUSION ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM FOR MAINTENANCE.
_______________________________________________________
SIGNATURE OF OWNER(S)DATE
-
1
-
3
IT
E
M
:
4
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEO
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHEOHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
25 26
12
345
67
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
29 30
27 28
31
32
33
34
36
39
35
37
38
40
42
41
45
46
43
44
47
48
50
49
51525453
55
57
56
59
60
58
61
62
64
63
65
66
67696870
72
71
74
73
75
80
76
78
77
79
82
81
83 8584
86
87
8988
90 92
91
94
93
96
95
97
98
100
99
101
102
105
103
104107106
108
110
111
109
112
114
113
115116
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
K
J
M
L
60
'
34
'
50'
26'
50'
26'
20
'
20'
R30'
R30
'
R30'R30
'
R30'R3
0
'
R30'R3
0
'
R3
0
'
R30'
R30'
R
3
0
'
10' UTILIT
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
10'
10'
25'
C
O
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20'DRAINAGEEASEMENT AND VEGETATED BUFF ER
20'
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20
'
10'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
10' U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
R3
0
'
26'
50'
26'50'
R3
0
'
20' MIN.
TYP.
18'26'18'8'
8'
9'
18'
24'
18'
20
'
M
I
N
.
TY
P
.
10'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
10' UTILIT
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
10' UTILITY E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
10' UTILITY EASEMENT
10' UTIL
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
30'
26'
R30'
R30'
R3
0
'
R30'
R3
0
'
DA
T
E
:
SC
A
L
E
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
PEI JOB#:
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
FIN
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
DR
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SEAL
CL
I
E
N
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:
08
/
2
4
/
1
6
08
/
0
1
/
1
6
NE
W
H
A
N
O
V
E
R
C
O
.
,
N
O
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
MA
S
O
N
B
O
R
O
T
O
W
N
S
H
I
P
16289.PE
WH
I
S
K
E
Y
-
N
A
V
A
J
O
1.
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
P
E
R
T
R
C
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
S
9
/
2
8
/
1
6
±1.89 AC AMENITY AREA WITH
POOL AND CLUBHOUSE WITH
MAILBOXES USED AS OPEN
SPACE
18 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
PROJECT
ENTRANCE
EXIST
I
N
G
P
O
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
SITE DATA TABULATION
OWNER:DRY POND PARTNERS, LLC
PROJECT ADDRESS:PO BOX 3649
WILMINGTON, NC 28406
TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION #: R07100-004-004-000
TOTAL PARCEL AREA:133.45 AC
RECORDED DEED BOOK:DB 5373 PG 1557
CURRENT ZONING:R-15
PROPOSED ZONING:R-15 (PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL)
CAMA LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: AQUIFER RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA AND
WATERSHED RESOURCE PROTECTION
EXISTING LAND USE: UNUSED LAND
PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE:UNDEVELOPED
DIMENSION STANDARDS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
59.1.1-2.1BUILDINGS ON THE PERIPHERY OF A PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL
SETBACK NO LESS THAN TWENTY (20) FEET FROM THE ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE.
(6/16/86)
59.1.1-2.2IN NO CASE SHALL ANY PART OF A DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT BE LOCATED
CLOSER THAN TEN (10) FEET TO ANY PART OF ANY OTHER DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING; AND IN NO CASE SHALL ANY PART OF A MULTIPLE DWELLING UNIT BE LOCATED
CLOSER THAN TWENTY (20) FEET TO ANY PART OF ANOTHER DWELLING UNIT. (6/1/92)
OPEN SPACE
REQUIRED PROVIDED
170 LOTS x 0.03 AC/UNIT5.10 AC5.17 AC
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE2.73 AC
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 2.44 AC
5.17 AC
BUFFERYARD
BUFFER AGAINST RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IS EQUAL TO 50% OF REQUIRED SETBACK PER UDO
SECTION 62.1-4
FLOOD NOTE
THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X (AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 3720312900J WITH
A DATE OF APRIL 3, 2006. SEE MAP FOR PRELIMINARY FLOOD DATA
ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE
ALL BUFFERS, DRAINAGE AREAS AND PASSIVE / ACTIVE OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
TREE PRESERVATION
1.ALL TREES WILL BE PRESERVED OR REMOVED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 62.1-3 AND 67
2.REFER TO SHEET C-2.1 FOR EXISTING TREE INFORMATION
DENSITY DATA
TOTAL OVERALL SITE ACREAGE:± 133.45 AC
TOTAL PARENT PARCEL TO REMAIN:± 62.10 AC
TOTAL PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL R-15 TRACT ACREAGE: ± 71.35 AC
DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
GROSS PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL R-15 TRACT ACREAGE:± 71.35 AC
LESS - APPROXIMATE WETLAND AREA:± 3.12 AC
LESS - APPROXIMATE STREAM AREA:± 0.28 AC
TOTAL AREA SUBTRACTED:± 3.40 AC
NET TRACT ACREAGE:± 67.95 AC
BUILDING UNITS (PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL ALLOWS 2.5 UNITS / ACRE)
ALLOWED UNITS:170 UNITS
(2.5 x 67.95)
PROPOSED UNITS: 170 UNITS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 170 UNITS
TOTAL TOWNHOMES:54 UNITS (PHASE 2A)
TOTAL DUPLEX:28 UNITS (PHASE 1)
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:88 TOTAL LOTS
PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
RANGE IN SIZE FROM:60' x 120' (7,200 SF)
TO
80' x 170' (13,600 SF)
(54) SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
VEGETATED BUFFER
STORMWATER POND
0 50 100 200 400
SCALE: 1"=100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR
ROAD (60' ROW)
ROAD CONNECTION TO ADJACENT PARCEL
(26'W G-G, TAPERS TO 30'W AT CONNECTION)
(16) SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
VEGETATED BUFFER
VEGET
A
T
E
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
±0.50 AC ACTIVE
OPEN SPACE W/
MAIL KIOSK
±0.22 AC ACTIVE
OPEN SPACE
20' BOUNDARY SETBACK,
TYP. TO BE KEPT AS HOA
MAINTAINED BUFFER
N O R T H
SIGNIFICANT TREE, TYP.
25' COD SETBACK
(SWAMP FOREST
WETLANDS)
PROJECT ROADS
ALL PROPOSED ROADS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BUILT TO NCDOT & NHC
STANDARDS. ALL ROADS WILL BE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
THERE SHALL BE NO ENCUMBRANCES WITHIN THE NCDOT RIGHT OF WAY
ONLY NCDOT APPROVED MATERIALS ARE TO BE USED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY
TOWNHOME SECTION WILL BE BUILT WITH PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WITH PARKING
IMPERVIOUS AREAS
RIGHT OF WAYS (INCLUDING AMENITY PARKING)7.53 AC
PARKING (TOWNHOMES)1.44 AC
TOTAL8.97 AC
STREET LIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET LIGHT MODELS AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY
DUKE ENERGY
BEDROOMS
- TOWNHOUSES WILL HAVE APPROXIMATELY 2-3 BEDROOMS PER UNIT
- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL HAVE APPROXIMATELY 3-4 BEDROOMS
502 MOHICAN
TRAIL
418 MOHICAN
TRAIL
EXISTING 60' R.O.W.
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
±1.38 AC PASSIVE
OPEN SPACE
±0.50 AC PASSIVE
OPEN SPACE
10
/
0
4
/
1
6
1"=
1
0
0
'
AE
JR
C AE
20' BOUNDARY BUFFER OFFSET FROM
NAVAHO TRAIL GREENWAY EASEMENT
AMENITY WITH ARBOR,
WALKWAY AND
MULTI-PURPOSE LAWN
AMENITY WITH ARBOR,
WALKWAY AND
MULTI-PURPOSE AREA
(54) TOWNHOME
UNITS W/ 20' MIN.
BETWEEN
STRUCTURES
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
WOODED AREAS TO BE
LEFT IN NATURAL STATE
(TO GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE) WITH
SELECTIVE CLEARING OF
INVASIVE PLANT
MATERIAL
PAREN
T
P
A
R
C
E
L
20' BOUNDARY SETBACK
PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY
50' JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM BUFFER
FUTURE PROPOSED ROADWAY
CONNECTION TO FOX RUN
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA.NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTIONHAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OFSOILS DATA.
8'18'26'18'8'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK90° PARKING STALL90° PARKING STALLPRIVATE DRIVE
34' G-G13'
5'7'1'1'
13'
5'7'1'1'
1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT 1/2" PER FT1/2" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB 6" STONEUNDER CURBING
6"-B25.0B BASE
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA.NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTIONHAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OFSOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
SLOPES= 3:1
60' RIGHT OF WAY
26' G-G12'
5'6'1'1'
12'
5'6'1'1'
1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB 6" STONEUNDER CURBING
6"-B25.0B BASE
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA.NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTIONHAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OFSOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
SLOPES= 3:1
50' RIGHT OF WAY
2%2%
TURNDOWN CURBAT SIDEWALK 6"-B25.0B BASE1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
REFER TO SHEET C-2.1 FOR
TREE EXHIBIT
10' x 70' DOT SIGHT
TRIANGLE, TYP.
DUMPSTER LOCATIONMAIL KIOSK FOR
TOWNHOMES
28 DUPLEX UNITS WITH 20' MIN.
BETWEEN STRUCTURES
ADA CURB RAMPS AND
CROSSWALKS, TYP.
25' GUY WIRE AND
TRANSMISSION POLE
EASEMENT
±0.65 AC PASSIVE
OPEN SPACE
-
1
-
4
IT
E
M
:
4
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
- 1 - 5 ITEM: 4
Planning Board - November 3, 2016
VICINITY MAP
INDEX OF SHEETS
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
7230 CAROLINA BEACH ROAD
DEVELOPER/OWNER
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
SEPTEMBER 2016
McADAMS HOMES, LLC
6626-C GORDON ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PHONE: (910) 799-3006
LEGEND
PROJECT NAME: 7230 CAROLINA BEACH ROAD
GSP CONSULTING PROJECT #: 2016-0004
FOR
SITE DATA TABLE
PREPARED BY:
-
1
-
6
IT
E
M
:
4
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6
No.
License #
Revision Designer
Drawn By
DateBy Scale
Date
Job No.
PREPARED FOR:Sheet No.7230 CAROLINA BEACH ROAD McADAMS HOMES, LLC
6626-C GORDON ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
910-799-3006WilmingtonNew Hanover County North Carolina
PRELIMINARY PLAN C-3
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 inch = 30 ft.
30 0153060
-
1
-
7
IT
E
M
:
4
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
1
6