HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.20.16 Meeting NotesCity of Wilmington /New Hanover County Joint Ad -hoc Affordable /Workforce Housing Committee
September 20, 2016
Meeting Notes
Welcome:
• Dr. Earl Sheridan, Councilmember City of Wilmington
Review Last Meeting Outcomes
Jennifer Rigby reviewed the decisions from last meeting including ground rules, what success looks like,
and the schedule and process for reaching the desired outcome. She also mentioned that a website is
being developed and the link will be sent to committee members in the near future.
In reviewing What is Success committee members offered the following comments for clarification and
emphasis:
• Need to establish priority from list of success
• Committee should include rental housing in discussion, not only homeownership
• Be sure to recognize the changing demographics in determining housing demand, include aging
population and talent drain
• Housing and economic development align, housing product should be targeted to desired
industry /employer
Cit°y/CountyWurkfoirce & Affordable
11ousi rio g Ad hoc Cornonittee
G'tLwJ l*ak11PWIZ..
1
J ,�
t 41 vti �7rv,
IY' ( aL tI°r Li Srh
........................... w.
°m
vi
1 nv7 m,
Selection of Chair and Vice - Chair:
Nominees: Jody Wanio, Robert Rosenberg, and Paul D'Angelo
Each nominee spoke briefly about why they interested in serving. Committee members voted via
written ballot as follows:
• Jody Wainio — Chair
• Robert Rosenberg — Vice Chair
Show & Share:
To start off show and share and establish common framework for future discussions Suzanne reviewed
some data about housing cost burden, housing and income mismatch, trends in housing cost and
income and other related information. In addition, an overview of the City of Wilmington's community
development and housing programs was presented. The powerpoint is attached.
The following questions and discussion points came up during the presentation:
• Does the City communicate the impact of urban sprawl on traffic congestion? How does this
factor into the Traffic Impact Analysis for residential development?
• Need to take a broader view of traffic impact and development that contributes to traffic
congestion. Residential development near employment helps reduce traffic congestion overall.
• Need to look at past projects and verify the Traffic Impact against the projected traffic impact
when the project was in the planning process.
• How do other cities evaluate the traffic congestion generate from urban sprawl and greenfield
development?
• What is cost of sprawl? What are the savings from solutions to sprawl, such as, increased
density, TOD, etc.?
• Who should committee focus on? HH w /incomes $0 -$18hr or $18 /hr
• Can produce rental units for HH below $18 /hr
• Need funds to fill the gap for HH 0$0- $18 /hr
• There are models for producing /providing housing for low- income HH
• National Low Income Housing Coalition — Out of Reach Report shows that for NC HH need to
earn $13 /hr to afford a 1 bedroom apartment; and $17 /hr for a 2 bedroom apartment.
• Disability income (SSDI) is $700 /mo in NC @ 30% of gross income = $220 /mo rent & utiltiies
• Private sector can't produce apartments for rent at $220
• Need to look at other options, example co- housing
Other Comments
• Invite Stephanie Norris to committee meeting to share her experience w/ LIHTC
• Invite MPO to discuss traffic and sprawl issues
• Invite Progress Energy /Duke and CFPUA re: cost of energy /utilities
• Provide list of non - profits provide housing
Committee members present:
Gloria Green
Phil Humphrey
Robert Rosenberg
Steve Spain
Dave Spetrino
Jody Wainio
Tilghman Herring
Linda Smith
Katrina Redmon
Paul D'Angelo
Katrina Knight
Will Bland
Absent: Elizabeth Dodson, David Barnes, Carlos Braxton
Notes prepared by: Suzanne Rogers
Powerpoints w/ be attached in final pdf version
Ground Rules:
~
Start & End ontime
~ ae prepared for mtgs.
~ mo cell phones
~
One speaker atatime
~
Work towards consensus
on decisions
~
Roberts Rules of Order
~
Open topublic
~
Public comments may be
submitted |nwriting
~ Weuaitetobecreated
~
Minutes and Agenda will be
available within two days of
next meeting.
City/County Workforce & Affordable
Housing Ad hoc Committee
~
People /nHouses
~
Viable Options
~
Measurable and Attainable
Recommendations
~
Inclusive Solutions
~
Immediate/Short-
term/Long-term Solutions
~
Inclusive ofExisting
Development Criteria
~
Solutions Move Forward
with Accountability
~
Educate Elected Officials
and Public
~
Establish aReal
audget/pundi,gamoe
~
Address Negative Myths
~
Alignment with City/County
Plans
~
Define Affordable Housing
W/ ##s �
Include Best Practices
.
.
.1
0
.1
�)Ljslnll L.AOSIS VS_ MCC
.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Median Household Income
Median Gross Rent
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Housing Costs
— Median Owner Costs w/ a Mortgage
EF