Loading...
07122018 July 12 2018 PB Agenda PackageAGENDA N E W H A N O V E R C O U N T Y P LA N N I N G B OA R D A ssembly R o o m, New Hano ver C ounty Histo ric C ourthouse 24 No rth T hird S treet, R oo m 301 W ilmingto n, N C ERNEST W. OLDS, CHAIRMAN - THOMAS "JORDY" RAWL, VICE-CHAIRMAN PAUL D. BONEY, BOARD MEMBER - H. ALLEN POPE, BOARD MEMBER DONNA GIRARDOT, BOARD MEMBER - EDWARD T. (TED) SHIPLEY, III, BOARD MEMBER DAVID WEAVER, BOARD MEMBER WAYNE CLARK, PLANNING AND LAND USE DIRECTOR - KENNETH VAFIER, PLANNING MANAGER J U LY 12, 2018 6:00 P M Pledge of Allegiance (Ben A ndrea, C urrent P lanning & Z oning Supervisor) Approval of Minutes RE G UL AR I T E M S O F B US INE S S The Planning Board may consider substantial changes in these petitions as a result of objections, debate, and discussion at the meeting, including rezoning to other classifications. 1 P ublic Hearing Rezoning Request (Z 18-07) – R equest by Paramounte Engineering, I nc. on behalf of the property owner, E ston C. B rinkley, to rezone approximately 18.1 acres of land located at the 8900 block of Stephens C hurch Road from R -15, R esidential District, to R -10, Residential District. 2 P ublic Hearing Rezoning R equest (Z18-09) - Request by D esign S olutions on behalf of the property owner, Fred A. and Doris H. W hitman, to rezone approximately 16.8 acres of land located in the 500 block of Bountiful L ane from R -20, Residential District, to (C Z D ) R -10, Conditional R esidential District, in order to construct a performance residential development. 3 P ublic Hearing Rezoning R equest (Z18-10) - Request by D esign S olutions on behalf of the property owner, J ames Steele W illiams, I I I , to rezone approximately 5 acres of land located in the 4300 block of C astle Hayne R oad f rom R-20, Residential D istrict, to (C Z D) B-2, Conditional Highway B usiness D istrict, in order to develop a landscaping business. O T HE R I T E M S 1 Other I tems of Business Planning Board - July 12, 2018 NE W HAN O VE R C O UN T Y P LAN N IN G B O AR D R E Q UE S T F OR B OAR D AC T IO N ME E T IN G D AT E : 7/12/2018 R egular D E PART ME N T: P lanning P R E S E N T E R (S ): Ben And rea, C urrent P lanning and Zoning S up ervisor C O N TAC T (S ): Ben And rea; Ken Vafier, P lanning Manager S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing Rezoning Request (Z18-07) – Request by Paramounte Engineering, Inc. on behalf of the property owner, Eston C. B rinkley, to rezone approximately 18.1 acres of land located at the 8900 block of S tephens Church Road from R-15, Residential District, to R-10, R esidential District. B R IE F S UMMARY: P aramounte Engineering, Inc., on b ehalf of the p ro p erty o wner, Es ton C . Brinkley, is reques ting to rezone 18.1 ac res of land loc ated at the 8900 b lo ck of S tep hens C hurc h R oad o ff o f no rthern Market S treet/US Highway 17, from R -15 to R -10. Becaus e this is a general map amendment and no t a c o nditio nal rezo ning, uses that wo uld be allowed on the property are those allo wed b y right o r by S pec ial Use P ermit in the R -10 dis trict bas ed o n the Tab le of P ermitted Uses in the Zoning O rdinanc e. As b o th the R -15 and R -10 districts are res id ential d is tric ts , the uses p ermitted within them are mo s tly similar with o nly slight variatio ns . T he primary d ifferenc e b etween the districts is that the R -10 d is tric t allows fo r s maller lo ts and higher dens ity. Und er the performance res id ential s tandards, the sub ject property would be permitted a maximum o f 45 dwelling units in the current R -15 d is tric t, and 60 d welling units in the p ro p o s ed R -10 d is tric t. Traffic imp acts will be analyzed at the time a develo p ment is p ro p o s ed . Any us e that exc eeds 100 AM o r P M peak ho ur trips will be required to have an approved Traffic Impac t Analys is (T I A) p rio r to d evelopment. Even if a T I A is not required , imp ro vements may b e required when any propos ed us e is reviewed b y N C DO T d uring the driveway permitting p ro cess. Bas ed o n the s ize of the p ro p erty and the permitted dens ity, it is no t antic ip ated that a b y-right residential d evelopment wo uld generate enough traffic to warrant a T I A. A detached s ingle-family d welling typ ically generates about one trip d uring the peak hours . T he p ro p o s ed rezoning would allow 15 additio nal d welling units on the p ro p erty, whic h would generate approximately 15 additio nal trips d uring the peak ho urs. T he 2016 C omprehens ive Land Us e P lan classifies the sub ject p ro p erty as C ommunity Mixed Us e. T his P lac e Type foc uses on s mall-s cale, c o mp ac t, mixed us e develo p ment p atterns that s erve all mod es o f travel and ac t as an attrac tor fo r c o unty residents and visito rs . Types o f appropriate uses inc lud e offic e, retail, mixed us e, recreatio nal, c o mmercial, ins titutio nal, and multi-family and s ingle-family res id ential. T he proposed R -10 rezoning is generally C ON S IS T E N T with the C o mmunity Mixed Us e p lace type. It provid es hous ing at dens ities cons is tent with what is encouraged in this p lace type and envis io ned to be loc ated near gro wth nodes. S T R AT E G IC P LAN ALIG N ME N T: Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 Intelligent G rowth and Ec o nomic Develo p ment R E C O MME N D E D MO T IO N AN D R E QUE S T E D AC T ION S : S taff rec o mmends ap p ro val and s uggests the following motio n: Mo tion to rec o mmend ap p ro val, as the Board finds that this reques t fo r a zo ning map amendment o f approximately 18.1 acres fro m the R -15 district to a R -10 distric t as des c rib ed is : 1. C ons is tent with the p urposes and intent o f the 2016 C omprehens ive P lan b ecaus e it p ro vides for infill residential d evelo p ment s imilar to the exis ting p attern of the area and aligns with the dens ity recommend ation for the C ommunity Mixed Use p lace type. 2. R easonab le and in the p ublic interes t b ecaus e the p ro p o s al wo uld es tablis h an R -10 zoning district in an area where p ublic water and s ewer is available. C O UN T Y MAN AGE R'S C OMME N T S AN D R E C OMME N DAT ION S : (only Manager) Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 SCRIPT for General Map Amendment Application (Z18-07) Request by Paramounte Engineering, Inc. on behalf of the property owner, Eston C. Brinkley, to rezone approximately 18.1 acres of land located at the 8900 block of Stephens Church Road from R-15, Residential District, to R-10, Residential District. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. At this time, you may ask to either continue the application to a future meeting, or to proceed with this Board deciding whether to recommend approval or denial of the application. What do you wish to do? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why it is, or is not, reasonable and in the public interest. Staff Suggested Motion: Motion to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 18.1 acres from the R-15 district to a R-10 district as described is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for infill residential development similar to the existing pattern of the area and aligns with the density recommendation for the Community Mixed Use place type. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal would establish an R-10 zoning district in an area where public water and sewer is available. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: Motion to recommend [Approval/Denial], as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 18.1 acres from the R-15 district to a R-10 district as described is: 1. [Consistent/Not Consistent] with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment is or is not consistent]. 2. [Reasonable/Not Reasonable] and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or balancing benefits and detriments]. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 1 of 9 STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-07 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z18-07 Request: Zoning Map amendment to rezone 18.1 acres from R-15 to R-10 Applicant: Property Owner(s): Paramounte Engineering, Inc Eston Brinkley Location: Acreage: 8971 Stephens Church Road 18.1 acres PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R02900-001-059-000 Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped The property would be allowed to be developed in accordance with the R-10 district Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-15 R-10 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single-Family Residential R-15 East Single-Family Residential R-15 South Single-Family Residential R-15 West Single-Family Residential, Undeveloped R-15 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 2 of 9 ZONING HISTORY July 6, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 5) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer CFPUA water and sewer services are available in the area. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District Schools Blair Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools Recreation Ogden Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources ZONING ORDINANCE CONSIDERATIONS  The purpose of the R-10, Residential zoning district is to provide for residential development with access to either public water or sewer services.  Because this is a general map amendment and not a conditional rezoning, uses that would be allowed on the property are those allowed by right or by Special Use Permit in the R- 10 district based on the Table of Permitted Uses in the Zoning Ordinance.  As both the R-15 and R-10 districts are residential districts, the uses permitted within them are mostly similar with only slight variations. The primary difference between the districts Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 3 of 9 is that the R-10 district allows for smaller lots and higher density as highlighted on the table below: R-15 R-10 Min Lot Size (Conventional) 15,000 sf 10,000 sf Max Density (Performance) 2.5 du/ac 3.3 du/ac Maximum Units based on 18.1 Acres (Performance Residential) 45 60  The subject site is close to Market Street in a transition area not expected to be very low density residential per the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. TRANSPORTATION  Access is provided to the subject property by Stephens Church Road (SR 1351) which connects to Market Street/ US Highway 17.  Traffic impacts will be analyzed at the time a development is proposed. Any use that exceeds 100 AM or PM peak hour trips will be required to have an approved Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prior to development. Even if a TIA is not required, improvements may be required when any proposed use is reviewed by NCDOT during the driveway permitting process.  Based on the size of the property and the permitted density, it is not anticipated that a by-right residential development would generate enough traffic to warrant a TIA. A detached single-family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the peak hours.  The proposed rezoning would allow 15 additional dwelling units on the property, which would generate approximately 15 additional trips during the peak hours. Traffic Counts Road Location Volume Capacity V/C LOS Market Street 8200-8300 Block 42,512 57,008 0.75 D Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 4 of 9 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Regional Transportation Plans:  NCDOT Project 44238 o Proposal for roadway improvements at the Market Street/I-140 interchange. Preliminary plans propose to realign the I-140 Market Street exit so that it connects directly into Porters Neck Road, and to widen existing ramps to and from Highway 17. This project is currently unfunded. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses will expire if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 5 of 9 Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status 1. Scotts Hill Apartments  192 apartment dwelling units  Under Draft  2020 Buildout Year The WMPO has approved the scope for the Traffic Impact Analysis for this project and the consulting traffic engineer will use the approved scope to draft the TIA. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  New Hanover Regional Medical Center  Scott’s Hill Village  Blake Farm Development Status: Pending application after TIA approval. Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status 2. Scotts Hill Charter School  Phase 1 (2016-2017) – 490 students  Phase 2 (2018-2019) – 587 students  Phase 3 (2019-2020) – 664 students  Phase 4 (2020-2021) – 731 students  TIA approved January 11, 2017 The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The major improvements consisted of:  Extension of the existing northbound left/u-turn lane at US 17 and Sidbury Road  Modification of signal timing at certain traffic lights in the area The following improvements were recommended:  Driveway improvements at the site’s access with Pandion Drive  Installation of a left turn lane into the site  Installation of dual westbound right-turn lanes on Scotts Hill Loop Road at the US 17 intersection Per NCDOT, the improvements required at this time have been installed in accordance with their standards. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  Blake Farm  New Hanover Regional Medical Center  Scotts Hill Village Development Status: Building Completed Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 6 of 9 3. Blake Farm (Pender County)  500 single family units  700 active adult/senior attached units  1,798 active adult/senior detached units  50,000 sq. ft. mini-warehouse  50,000 sq. ft. retail space  2 150-room hotels  TIA approved July 6, 2015  2029 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The major improvements consist of: Phase 1:  Restrict site driveway #1 intersection to left-in/right-in/right-out with a 200’ internal protected stem  Installation of a 225’ left-turn lane on northbound US 17  Installation of a 125’ right-turn lane on southbound US 17  Installation of a new signal at US 17 and Sidbury Road  Installation of a 200’ u-turn lane on southbound US 17 at Sidbury Road Phase 2:  Restrict site driveway #2 intersection to left-in/right-in/right-out with a 200’ internal protected stem  Installation of a 150’ left-turn lane on northbound US 17 at site driveway #2  Installation of an additional receiving thru-lane with a minimum storage of 800’  Installation of a 125’ right-turn lane on southbound US 17 at site driveway #2  Installation of dual 250’ left-turn lanes on northbound US 17 at site driveway #1  Add additional right-turn egress lane on site driveway #1  Restripe existing thru lane on Sidbury Road at site driveway #3 to a left/thru lane  Installation of a 50’ right turn lane on westbound Sidbury Road at site driveway #3  Restrict site driveway #2 to two-lane cross section with one ingress lane and one left/right turn egress lane and 100’ internal protected stem The required improvements are pending installation as the project progresses. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  None Development Status: Pending Development 4. Scotts Hill Village  226 Single-Family Homes  TIA approved February 4, 2014  2018 Build Out Year Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 7 of 9 The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The major improvements consist of:  Installation of an eastbound right turn lane at Scotts Hill Loop Road and the site access Per NCDOT, the improvements required at this time have been installed in accordance with their standards. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  Vineyard West  Stevens Point Apartments  Scotts Hill Medical Center Development Status: Under construction, two phases have been platted consisting of 68 lots 5. Scotts Hill Village New Hanover Regional Emergency Facility  64,000 sq. ft. of medical offices  200,000 sq. ft. hospital  TIA Approved April 8, 2014  2018 Full Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The major improvements consist of:  Installation of a northbound u-turn lane, left-turn crossover lane, and westbound right-turn lanes at the intersection of US 17 and Scotts Hill Medical Drive  Installation of a u-turn lane at on US 17 at Scotts Hill Loop Road Per NCDOT, the improvements required at this time have been installed in accordance with their standards. Additional improvements will be required to be installed when future phases of the development are completed. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  Scotts Hill Village  Stevens Point Apartments  Vineyard West Development Status: Partially Completed ENVIRONMENTAL  The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas.  The property contains 1.56 acres of wetlands subject to regulation by the US Army Corps of Engineers.  The property is within the Island Creek (C;Sw) watershed. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN  The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 8 of 9 community. Specific goals of the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may be relevant for particular properties. Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Place Type Description Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential. Analysis The subject property is located in an area near the Porters Neck growth node that has been designated as Community Mixed Use. It directly abuts several homes and is almost directly across Market Street from the Scotts Hill medical complex. New development in this place type is intended to incorporate a mix of office, retail, and housing at densities higher than the existing residential development pattern. The densities allowed in the R-10 zoning district are in keeping with those recommended for Community Mixed Use areas and could be an appropriate transition to the development intensity envisioned for this area. Consistency Recommendation The proposed R-10 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the Community Mixed Use place type. It provides housing at densities consistent with what is encouraged in this place type and envisioned to be located near growth nodes. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8 Z18-07 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 9 of 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the application. Staff concludes that the application is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for infill residential development similar to the existing pattern of the area and aligns with the density recommendation for the Community Mixed Use place type. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal would establish an R-10 zoning district in an area where public water and sewer is available. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9 MARKE T S T S T E P H E N S C H U R C H R D SCOTTS HI L L ME DI C A L D R SALEMC T C R E E K W O O D R D B O O T H B AYCT MARKE T S T R-15 (CZD) O&I B-1 (CUD) B-1 (CUD) B-2 (CUD) O&I (CZD) B-1 ® Z18-07 Parcels within 500 Feet of Case Site Case: Z18-07 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed UseSite Address: 8700 block Stephens Church Rd R-15/ Undeveloped R-10 1,000 Feet R Physical Address 121 CREEKWOOD RD 8750 SIDBURY RD 8921 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8923 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8924 MARKET ST 8929 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8937 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8941 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8951 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8959 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8961 MARKET ST 8971 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8971 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8973 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8975 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8981 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 8985 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9000 MARKET ST 9001 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9009 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9015 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9021 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9027 STEPHENS CHURCH RD 9101 MARKET ST 9105 MARKET ST 9111 MARKET ST 9121 MARKET STPlanning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1 CUD B-1 CUD B-2 CUD O&I B-1 R-15 CZD O&I MARKE T S T C R E E K W O O D R D B L UFF CT SALEMCT B O OTHBAYCT SCOT T S HIL L M E DI C A L D R S T E P H E N S C H U R C H R D ® Z18-07 Parcels within 500 Feet of Case Site Case: Z18-07 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed UseSite Address: 8700 block Stephens Church Rd R-15/ Undeveloped R-10 Zoning Districts SHOD A-I AR B-1 B-2 EDZD I-1 I-2 O&I PD R-10 R-15 R-20 R-20S R-7 RA RFMU SC Incorporated Areas Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) See Section 55.1 of the Zoning OrdinanceCOD Sewer Collector Water Distribution Main 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1 MARKE T S T C R E E K W O O D R D B L U F F C T SALEM CT BOO T H B A Y C T S C O T T S H I L L M E D I C A L D R STEP H E N S C H U R C H R D ® Z18-07 Place Types Commerce Zone Employment Center General Residential Urban Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Rural Residential Conservation Case: Z18-07 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed UseSite Address: 8700 block Stephens Church Rd R-15/ Undeveloped R-10 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1 APPLICANT MATERIALS Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 8 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 9 NE W HAN O VE R C O UN T Y P LAN N IN G B O AR D R E Q UE S T F OR B OAR D AC T IO N ME E T IN G D AT E : 7/12/2018 R egular D E PART ME N T: P lanning P R E S E N T E R (S ): Brad S chuler, C urrent P lanner C O N TAC T (S ): Brad S c huler; Ben And rea, C urrent P lanning & Zoning S up ervisor; Ken Vafier, P lanning Manager; and Wayne C lark, P lanning & Land Us e Directo r S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing Rezoning Request (Z18-09) - Request by Design S olutions on behalf of the property owner, Fred A. and Doris H. Whitman, to rezone approximately 16.8 acres of land located in the 500 block of B ountiful Lane from R-20, Residential D istrict, to (C ZD ) R-10, Conditional Residential District, in order to construct a performance residential development. B R IE F S UMMARY: Design S o lutio ns , o n behalf of the p ro p erty owners , F red A. & Doris H. W hitman, is reques ting to rezone approximately 16.8 acres o f land loc ated in the 500 bloc k of Bountiful Lane fro m R -20 to (C ZD) R -10 in o rd er to c o nstruc t a performance res id ential develo pment c ons is ting o f 55 townho me units . A performance res idential d evelopment provid es more flexib ility in the des ign o f s ubdivis io ns b y not req uiring a minimum lot s ize and b y allowing fo r multip le hous ing typ es . Ho wever, thes e typ es o f d evelopments are s ubjec t to a maximum d ensity requirement. P erformanc e develo p ments within the p ro p o s ed R -10 district are permitted a maximum dens ity of 3.3 dwelling units p er ac re, whic h eq uates to a maximum of 55 d welling units on the sub ject property. As c urrently zoned , R -20, the pro p erty wo uld b e allowed up to 32 dwelling units und er the p erfo rmanc e residential s tand ard s (1.9 du/ac ). By not requiring a minimum lot s ize, p erfo rmanc e develo p ments allow flexib ility for ad d itional land to b e utilized fo r open spac e and sto rmwater purp o s es . T he propos ed d evelopment will clus ter the 55 townho me units on the eas tern portio n o f the property whic h allo ws the projec t to provid e 10.6 ac res of rec reatio n spac e (63% o f the sub ject property). O nly 1.65 ac res of recreatio n s pace (10% o f the p ro p erty) is req uired. T he ap p licant has p ro vided trip generatio n es timates for the proposed d evelopment. T he p ro p o s al is not exp ected to generate mo re than 100 peak hour trip s and therefore, ac c o rd ing to S ec tion 61.4 of the Zoning O rdinanc e, a Traffic Imp act Analys is was not required to b e c o mp leted. Traffic impac ts will b e reviewed by NC DO T through the d riveway p ermitting proc es s . T he 2016 C o mprehens ive Land Us e P lan classifies the sub ject p ro p erty as G eneral R esidential. T his P lac e Typ e promotes lo wer-dens ity ho us ing and as s oc iated c ivic and c ommerc ial s ervic es . Typ ically, hous ing is single-family or duplexes . C ommerc ial us es s hould be limited to s trategic ally loc ated o ffice and retail s p aces, while rec reation and sc hool facilities are enc o uraged throughout. T he p ro p o s ed c ond itional R -10 rezo ning is generally C O N S IS T E N T with the C o mp rehens ive P lan b ec aus e it provid es residential d evelopment c o mp atible with the adjac ent neighb o rhoods, is with the d ensity range rec o mmended fo r G eneral R es id ential, and protects the site’s environmental res o urc es by clus tering s tructures and infras tructure. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 S T R AT E G IC P LAN ALIG N ME N T: Intelligent G rowth and Ec o nomic Develo p ment R E C O MME N D E D MO T IO N AN D R E QUE S T E D AC T ION S : S taff rec o mmends ap p ro val and s uggest the following motio n: Mo tion to rec o mmend ap p ro val, as the Board finds that this reques t fo r a zo ning map amendment o f approximately 16.8 acres fro m the R -20 district, to a C onditio nal R -10 dis tric t, as des c rib ed is : 1. C ons is tent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 C omprehensive P lan because it provides for infill residential development that is compatible to the existing pattern of the area, while protecting environmentally resources by clustering structures and infrastructure. 2. R easonab le and in the public interest because the project will provide increased amounts of open space which promotes the protection of the natural environment and wildlife habitats. A lternative M o tio n fo r A ppro val/Denial: Mo tion to rec o mmend [Ap p ro val/Denial], as the Board finds that this req ues t for a zoning map amend ment o f approximately 16.8 acres fro m the R -20 district, to a C o nditio nal R -10 dis trict, as desc rib ed is: 1. [C ons is tent/No t C ons is tent] with the p urposes and intent o f the 2016 C omprehensive P lan b ecaus e [Desc rib e elements o f c o ntro lling land us e plans and how the amendment is or is no t cons is tent]. 2. [R easonab le/Not R eas o nable] and in the pub lic interest b ec aus e [Briefly explain why. F ac tors may includ e pub lic health and s afety, c harac ter of the area and relatio nship o f us es , ap p lic able plans , o r b alanc ing b enefits and detriments ]. C ond itions : [List any agreed upon c o nditio ns] C O UN T Y MAN AGE R'S C OMME N T S AN D R E C OMME N DAT ION S : (only Manager) Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z18-09) Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Fred A. and Doris H. Whitman, to rezone approximately 16.8 acres of land located at the 500 block of Bountiful Lane from R-20, Residential District, to (CZD) R-10, Conditional Residential District, in order to construct a performance residential development. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. At this time, you may ask to either continue the application to a future meeting, or to proceed with this Board deciding whether to recommend approval or denial of the application. What do you wish to do? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why it is, or is not, reasonable and in the public interest. Staff Suggested Motion: Motion to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 16.8 acres from the R-20 district, to a Conditional R-10 district, as described is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for infill residential development that is compatible with the existing pattern of the area, while protecting environmental resources by clustering structures and infrastructure. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide increased amounts of open space which promotes the protection of the natural environment and wildlife habitats. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: Motion to recommend [Approval/Denial], as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 16.8 acres from the R-20 district, to a Conditional R-10 district, as described is: 1. [Consistent/Not Consistent] with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment is or is not consistent]. 2. [Reasonable/Not Reasonable] and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public health and safety, character of the area and relations hip of uses, applicable plans, or balancing benefits and detriments]. Conditions: [List any agreed upon conditions] Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 1 of 7 STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-09 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z18-09 Request: Conditional R-10 Zoning District in order to develop a performance residential development Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions Fred A. & Doris H. Whitman Location: Acreage: 500 Block of Bountiful Lane 16.76 acres PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R03300-001-037-000 General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Single-family dwellings Performance residential subdivision Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-20 (CZD) R-10 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single-Family Residential R-20, R-15 East Single-Family Residential R-20, R-15 South Single-Family Residential R-20 West Single-Family Residential, Undeveloped R-20 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 2 of 7 ZONING HISTORY July 1, 1974 Initially zoned R-20 (Area 10A) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sewer service is available through CFPUA. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Wrightsboro Schools Wightsboro Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High schools Recreation Optimist Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation The Conservation Overlay District indicates that swamp forest may exist on the western portion of the property, outside of the areas of disturbance for the proposed development Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources PROPOSED SITE PLAN  This application proposes to construct a performance residential development consisting of 55 townhome units. A performance residential development provides more flexibility in the design of subdivisions by not requiring a minimum lot size and by allowing for multiple housing types. However, these types of developments are subject to a maximum density requirement. Performance developments within the proposed R-10 district are permitted a maximum density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre, which equates to a maximum of 55 dwelling units on the subject property. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 3 of 7  As currently zoned, R-20, the property would be allowed up to 32 dwelling units under the performance residential standards (1.9 du/ac).  By not requiring a minimum lot size, performance developments allow flexibility for additional land to be utilized for open space and stormwater purposes. Although the proposal is a notable increase in the number of allowable dwelling units, it will cluster the townhomes on the eastern portion of the property which allows the project to provide 10.6 acres of recreation space (63% of the subject property). Only 1.65 acres of recreation space (10% of the property) is required.  The applicant intends to preserve the trees within most of the provided recreation space which will provide buffering to the adjacent residences. In addition, a 20-foot buffer is required along all property lines abutting detached single-family homes. TRANSPORTATION  Access is provided to the subject property by Bountiful Lane (SR 2600) which connects to Castle Hayne Road (NC 133) by way of Oakley Road (SR 1329).  The proposed subdivision must obtain a driveway permit from NCDOT. Trip Generation LAND USE (ITE Code) INTENSITY AM PEAK PM PEAK Residential Townhome (230) 55 dwelling units 24 29 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 4 of 7 Traffic Counts - 2018 Road Location Volume Capacity V/C Castle Hayne Road 1,000 feet south of Rockhill Road 13,526 12,520 1.08 Oakley Road West of Castle Hayne Road 4,088 9,500* 0.45 Rockhill Road West of Castle Hayne Road 2,267 9,500* 0.24 *Approximation based on NCDOT’s Develop Roadway Capacities Manual. Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 5 of 7 Regional Transportation Plans: One project is included in State Transportation Improvement Program that will improve the portion of Castle Hayne Road adjacent to the subject property:  STIP Project U-5863 o Widening of Castle Hayne Road to multi-lanes from I-140 to Division Drive. Right-of- way acquisition is expected to begin in 2021 and construction is expected to begin in 2023.  Oakley Road and Castle Hayne Road o NCDOT will install a traffic signal at the intersection of Oakley Road and Castle Hayne Road. The project is expected to be completed within one year. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses will expire if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Listed below are projects within a one-mile radius from the subject site that are currently drafting a TIA or have completed a TIA within the last five years. Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status 1. Riverside  165 single-family dwellings  72 apartment units  Approved August 13, 2015  2019 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at the intersection of N. Kerr Avenue and Castle Hayne Road. The major improvements consisted of:  Installation of an eastbound right turn lane  Extension of the existing eastbound left turn lane Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  River Bluffs  Trasco Distribution Center Development Status: Subdivision Infrastructure Under Construction ENVIRONMENTAL  The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas.  The applicant has found no evidence of regulated wetlands within area of the property to be developed.  The property is within the Ness Creek (C;Sw) watershed.  Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable/slight limitation), Class II (moderate limitation) and Class IV (unsuitable) soils. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 6 of 7 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN  The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. Specific goals of the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may be relevant for particular properties. Future Land Use Map Place Type General Residential Place Type Description Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Analysis The intent of the General Residential place type is to preserve existing residential neighborhoods and provide opportunities for compatible lower density residential development and supportive commercial, civic, and recreational development. The proposed R-10 development would allow for the conservation of environmentally sensitive land, while providing residential development at a density consistent with the recommended range of this place type and compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Consistency Recommendation The proposed conditional R-10 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with this place type because it provides residential development that is compatible with the density of adjacent neighborhoods, is in line within the density recommendations for General Residential, and protects the site’s environmental resources by clustering structures and infrastructure. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6 Z18-09 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 7 of 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the application. Staff concludes that the application is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for infill residential development that is compatible to the existing pattern of the area, while protecting environmentally resources by clustering structures and infrastructure. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide increased amounts of open space which promotes the protection of the natural environment and wildlife habitats. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7 BOUNTIFUL LN OA K L E Y R D VEL V A D R HARVEST RD OAK L E Y C I R MEM O R Y L N TH A T C H C T RU S T I C L N BER R Y S T REMINISCERD COT T O N W O O D L N ERV I N S P L A C E D R SUNBEAMCT TIN G A C T OLD B A R N C T C RIBBCT GOOSE PONDCT HOUSTON CT OAK L E Y C I R R-20 R-15 R-10 ® Z18-09 Case: Z18-09 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 500 block Bountiful Lane R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) R-10/ Performance Residential 1,000 Feet R Physical Address Physical Address 2013 OAKLEY RD 3001 OAKLEY CIR 2014 OAKLEY RD 3003 MEMORY LN 2015 OAKLEY RD 3003 OAKLEY CIR 2017 OAKLEY RD 3004 OLD BARN CT 2023 OAKLEY RD 3004 THATCH CT 2025 OAKLEY RD 3005 OLD BARN CT 2026 OAKLEY RD 3006 THATCH CT 2027 OAKLEY RD 3007 MEMORY LN 2031 OAKLEY RD 3007 OAKLEY CIR 2033 OAKLEY RD 3007 OAKLEY CIR 2100 OAKLEY RD 3008 MEMORY LN 2101 OAKLEY RD 3008 OAKLEY CIR 2104 OAKLEY RD 3008 OLD BARN CT 2107 OAKLEY RD 3008 THATCH CT 2108 OAKLEY RD 3009 OLD BARN CT 2111 OAKLEY RD 3010 OAKLEY CIR 2113 OAKLEY RD 3013 OAKLEY CIR 2117 OAKLEY RD 3137 OAKLEY CIR 2121 OAKLEY RD 324 BOUNTIFUL LN 2126 OAKLEY RD 400 BOUNTIFUL LN 2129 OAKLEY RD 401 BOUNTIFUL LN 2133 OAKLEY RD 404 BOUNTIFUL LN 2202 OAKLEY RD 405 BOUNTIFUL LN 2205 OAKLEY RD 407 BOUNTIFUL LN 2206 OAKLEY RD 408 BOUNTIFUL LN 2209 OAKLEY RD 409 BOUNTIFUL LN 2906 THATCH CT 411 BOUNTIFUL LN 2912 THATCH CT 413 BOUNTIFUL LN 2915 THATCH CT 416 BOUNTIFUL LN 2918 THATCH CT 417 BOUNTIFUL LN 2921 THATCH CT 420 BOUNTIFUL LN 2923 THATCH CT 421 BOUNTIFUL LN 2925 THATCH CT 500 BOUNTIFUL LN 2929 THATCH CT 501 BOUNTIFUL LN 3000 OAKLEY CIR561 BOUNTIFUL LN Z18-09 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1 R-15 R-20 OAKL E Y R D REM I N I S C E R D CO T T O N W O O D L N MEM O R Y L N CRI B B C T TIN G A C T THA T C H C T BOUNTIFUL LN OLD B A R N C T GOOSE PO N D C T SUN BEAM CT ERV I N S P L A C E D R BER R Y S T HARVES T R D RU S T I C L N OAK L E Y C I R VEL V A D R ® Z18-09 Case: Z18-09 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 500 block Bountiful Lane R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) R-10/ Performance Residential Zoning Districts SHOD A-I AR B-1 B-2 EDZD I-1 I-2 O&I PD R-10 R-15 R-20 R-20S R-7 RA RFMU SC Incorporated Areas Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) See Section 55.1 of the Zoning OrdinanceCOD Sewer Collector Water Distribution Main 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1 CO T T O N W O O D L N REM I N I S C E R D OAKLEY RD MEM O R Y L N CRIB B C T TIN G A C T THA T C H C T HOUSTON CT BOUNTIFUL LN OLD B A R N C T GOOSE PO N D C T SUN BEAM CT ERV I N S P L A C E D R HARVEST RD RU S T I C L N OAK L E Y C I R VEL V A D R ® Z18-09 Place Types Commerce Zone Employment Center General Residential Urban Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Rural Residential Conservation Case: Z18-09 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 500 block Bountiful Lane R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) R-10/ Performance Residential 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1 APPLICANT MATERIALS Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 2 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1 Page 4 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: ______________________ Total Acreage of Proposed District: __________ Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ (CZD)R-10 16.76 AC. ThepurposeoftheR-10districtistoencouragemediumdensitydevelopmentwhereadequateservicesare alreadyavailable.Attachedhousingispermittedintheresidentialdistrictsbyperformancedevelopment standards.Clusteringofthehousingunitspreservesmorelandareaforopenspace.Thetownhomestyleof developmentaddsanalternativehousingoptioninthisareaoftheCountythathashistoricallybeenlimitedto single-familyhomesonlargerlots. Referencethesiteplanforprojectlayout.Theproposedlayoutclusterstheunitstominimizethelimitsof disturbanceandclearingofexistingvegetation-therebyaddingnaturalbuffering.Asidewalksystemruns throughouttheprojectforsafepedestriancirculation.Alllandscapingrequirementsforanattachedhousingproject wouldbeappliedtoaddshading,visualinterestandaestheticquality. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2 Page 5 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: _________________________________________________________________________________ Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): __________________________________ AM Peak Hour Trips: ___________________________ PM Peak Hour Trips: ______________________________ CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community-at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property’s classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 230-RESIDENTIALCONDO /TOWNHOME PERUNIT @ 54UNITS 2428 Thepoliciesforgrowthanddevelopmentencouragesafeandaffordablehousingtobeavailabletoevery citizen.SustainabilityoftheCountydependsonsensiblein-fillandmaximizinguseoflandsalready accessibletourbanservices.Increaseddensityofdevelopmentnotonlyaddstothetaxbase,butmakes betteruseoftheexistinginfrastructure. Rezoningthispropertyformoderatedensityprovidesalternativehousingopportunitiesinanareathat alreadyhaspublicservicesavailabletoit.Clusteringbyperformancestandardsallowsforconservationof moreenvironmentallysensitiveland. TheconstructionoftheI-140by-passwithaninterchangeatCastleHayneRoadhasmadethisareaofthe Countymoreattractiveforhousingopportunitiesbecauseoftheincreasedeaseofcommutingfromhometo jobsandservices.TheareaofthesubjectsitehasamixtureofR-20,R-15andR-10districts.Adding modestincreaseofdensityfornewdevelopmentisnotuncommon. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5 Legal Description for Conditional Zoning District 561 Bountiful Lane This description being suitable for municipal zone line only, being drawn from record only and neither the result of a complete and accurate survey of the premises nor a thorough title examination and being a composite of that parcel and excepted parcels as cited in Deed Book 4448, Page 739 of the New Hanover County Registry (said exceptions cited as lands in Deed Book 1553, Page 752 and Deed Book 1611, Page 1500 of the same registry). The resulting composite area is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Southern line of Oakley Avenue, said point being located North 84 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds West 705.2 feet and South 00 degrees 53 minutes West 27.0 feet (the point of intersection of two ditches as cited in Deed Book 4448, Page 739) and South 00 degrees 53 minutes West 18.12 feet from an old stone marked "DLG", located in the intersection of Oakley Road, Oakley Circle West and Oakley Avenue and running thence from said beginning point with the Southern line of Oakley Avenue, South 84 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds East 464.3 feet to a point; running thence south 35 degrees 38 minutes 45 seconds West 474.72 feet to an iron pipe; running thence North 82 degrees 19 minutes 15 seconds West 374.4 feet to an iron pipe; running thence South 07 degrees 55 minutes 45 seconds West 426.01 feet to an iron pipe in the Northern line of Lela Mae Sharpe tract; running thence with the Northern line of the Sharpe tract, North 85 degrees 35 minutes 45 seconds West 785.92 feet to an iron pipe, a corner of the C.L. Blanton tract; running thence with the Northern line of the Blanton tract, North 85 degrees 35 minutes 45 seconds West 235.17 feet to an iron pipe, a corner of the Axler land; running thence with the Axler line the following courses and distances thru the swamp, North 24 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds West 180.0 feet to an old pipe; thence North 84 degrees 08 minutes 15 seconds East 282.43 feet to an iron pipe; running thence North 47 degrees 58 minutes 45 seconds East 130.0 feet to an iron pipe; running thence North 83 degrees 38 minutes 45 seconds East 192.0 feet to an iron pipe; running thence North 83 degrees 21 minutes 45 seconds East 42.0 feet and North 26 degrees 41 minutes 45 seconds East 96.0 feet to a point in the mouth of a ditch; running thence up and with the run of said ditch, North 01 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds East 75.0 feet, North 10 degrees 21 minutes 15 seconds West 60.0 feet, North 27 degrees 05 minutes 45 seconds West 80.0 feet and North 15 degrees 29 minutes 45 seconds West 42.28 feet to a point in the Southern line of a 20 foot easement. Running thence with the Southern line of said 20 foot easement, North 82 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East 655.76 feet to a point in the Southern line of Oakley Avenue, thence with Southern line of Oakley Avenue South 84 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds East 91.52 feet to a point in the Western end of Oakley Avenue, the point of beginning, and containing 16.76 acres more or less. Said tract being subject to easements and servitudes of record. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 6 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Bountiful Village Townhomes Proposed Zoning: R-20 to (CZD) R-10 The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on May 11, 2018 . A copy of the written notice is also attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Wednesday, May 23, 2018; 6:00 p.m.; Wrightsboro Fire Station #11, 3515 N. Kerr Avenue. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in Lists The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A presentation was given on the tract status, the purpose of the conditional rezoning request and on the performance residential development method. A question and answer period followed. Primary concerns were voiced over the density and capacity of Oakley Road to handle more traffic. There was interest on size and quality of the proposed homes to be built, buffering views and limits of clearing & disturbance. Drainage patterns were discussed, along with current stormwater management requirements. As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: The developer committed to preserving existing vegetation by only clearing the necessary limits of disturbance for the clustered building pads, parking areas and stormwater pond. Date: June 11, 2018 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 7 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 8 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 9 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 10 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 11 1 cw o l f @ l o b o d e m a r . b i z Fr o m : av e r y c h @ e c . r r . c o m Se n t : We d n e s d a y , M a y 2 3 , 2 0 1 8 1 1 : 2 5 A M To : cw o l f @ l o b o d e m a r . b i z Su b j e c t : Bo u n t i f u l V i l l a g e Hi ,   U n f o r t u n a t e l y ,   I   h a v e   a   d i n n e r   m e e t i n g   t h i s   e v e n i n g   a n d   w i l l  n o t   b e   a b l e   t o   e x p r e s s   m y   c o n c e rn s   a t   t h e   W r i g h t s b o r o   F i r e   S t at i o n   t o n i g h t .                                                                                 A  ‐A l o n g   w i t h   m o s t   o f   m y   n e i g h b o r s  w e   a r e   e x t r e m e l y   u p s e t   w i t h   t h e  r a p i d l y   d i s a p p e a r i n g   w o o d l a n d   ar e a s   a r o u n d   W r i g h t s b o r o .   I   h o p e this development will not  in v o l v e   c l e a r   c u t t i n g .   W e   h a v e   t oo   o f t e n   o b s e r v e d   w h a t   h a p p e n e s  t o   w i l d l i f e   w i t h   t o t a l   d e s t r u c t i o n   o f   t h e i r   h a b i t a t s ‐ n o t   t o   m e nt i o n   a n y o n e ' s   e f f o r t s   t o   h a v e   fl o w e r   b e d s   a n d   g a r d e n s   i n   t h e i r   y a r d s !   H a s   a n   e n v i r o n m e n t a l   i m pa c t   s t u d y   b e e n   d o n e ?   I f   s o ,   h o w  m a y   I   o b t a i n   a   c o p y ?   D o e s   t h i s  developer plan to save trees  an d   g r e e n s p a c e ?   H o w   m u c h ?     ‐A n o t h e r   c o n c e r n   i s   t h e   i n c r e a s e d  t r a f f i c   t h i s   d e v e l o p m e n t   w i l l  c a u s e .   T h e   d e v e l o p e r   o n   R o c k h i l l   R d .   p r o j e c t   h a s   a l r e a d y   c u t   a  r o a d   t h r u   t o   O a k l e y   C i r c l e   w h i c h   wi l l   a d d   t o   t h e   t r a f f i c   v o l u m e   a l r ea d y .   I   d o n ' t   t h i n k   O a k l e y   R d .  w a s   e v e r   i n t e n d e d   f o r   h e a v y   t ra f f i c .   H a s   a   t r a f f i c   i m p a c t   s t u dy   b e e n   d o n e ?   I f   s o ,   h o w   m a y   I   o b t a i n   a   co p y .   ‐A r e   t h e r e   a n y   w e t l a n d s   o n   t h i s   pr o p e r t y ?   W h a t   s t e p s   w i l l   b e   t a ke n   t o   p r o t e c t   t h e m ?   ‐A l l   t h i s   r a p i d   d e v e l o p m e n t   i n   Wr i g h t s b o r o ,   i n c l u d i n g   t h i s   p r o j ec t   a r e   a d d i n g   t o   t h e   sc h o o l   o v e r c r o w d i n g   i s s u e .   I s   t h i s   d e v e l o pe r   w i l l i n g   t o   d o n a t e   l a n d   o r   m o b l i e   cl a s s r o o m s   t o   h e l p   o u r   a r e a   s c h o o l s ?   ‐M u c h   o f   t h e   l a n d   i s   l o w   a n d   s o m e   n e i g h b o r s   h a v e   f l o o d i n g   e v e n   af t e r   a   h e a v y   r a i n .   I ' m   c o n c e r n e d   p a v i n g ,   b u i l d i n g ,   t a k i n g   o u t   mo r e   t r e e s   w i l l   o n l y   i n c r e a s e   t h i s   pr o b l e m .   W i l l   t h i s   c o n c e r n   b e   a d d r e s s e d ?          T h a n k   y o u   f o r   t h e   o p p o r t u n i t y   t o   e x p r e s s   m y   i s s u e s .   R e a l i z i ng   t h a t   t h i s   a r e a   o f   N e w   H a n o v e r   C o .   i s   t h e   l a s t   a r e a   w i t h   l a n d  t r a c t s   o f   a n y   s i z e ,   I   s t i l l   d o n ' t   t h i n k   w e   sh o u l d   b e   b u l l d o z e d   u n t i l   o u r   q u a l i t y   o f   l i f e   i s   r u i n e d !   R i v e r   Bl u f f s   i s   a   l o v e l y   d e v l o p m e n t   w i th   p a t h s ,   g r e e n s p a c e   a n d   T R E E S   of   a   n o r m a l   s i z e .   I   h o p e   t h i s   p r o j e c t   ca n   b e   m o d i f i e d   a n d   t a s t e f u l l y   d o n e ,   t o o .   I t   w o n ' t   j u s t   e f f e c t   th o s e   w i t h i n   5 0 0   f e e t ,   i t   e f f e ct s   t h e   e n t i r e   c o m m u n i t y .                                                                                                C y n t h i a   A v e r y ,   2 31 7   O a k l e y   R d .       Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 2 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 3 OWNER NAMEMAILING ADDRESS CITY / STATE/ ZIPSITUS ADDRESS 3008 THATCH LTD PTNRSHP 2840 S COLLEGE RD #319 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 3008 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE AKERS EVERETT CARLTON WANDA G 2031 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2027 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE AKERS EVERETT CARLTON WANDA GAIL 2406 BLOOMSBURY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 2031 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE APPLE VALLEY INC 2708 SHANDY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 501 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE BAREFOOT A B HRS 2101 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2101 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE BLACKBURN LISA A 3010 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3010 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE BRADSHAW SHIRLEY M2206 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2206 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE BROCK DONALD R ETAL 2014 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2014 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE BRYAN RUBY2100 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2100 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE BURTON LINDSAY 3009 OLD BARN CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3009 OLD BARN CT CASTLE HAYNE BUCHANAN DORIS A 421 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 421 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTH2708 SHANDY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409  BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTH235 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403  BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTHORITY 235 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 401 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE CARLTON GWENDOLYN M416 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 416 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE COOPER WILLIAM L DONNA 2129 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2129 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE CRAWFORD CHARLES K CHERIE2583 MERCER ST SANDY LAKE, PA 16145 2915 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE CRAWFORD LESLIE O BONITA E 2104 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2104 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE CRIBB JAMES L 408 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 408 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE DAVIS JAMES F CATHERINE O 2017 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2017 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE HATCHER DEBRA M324 BOUNTIFUL LNCASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 324 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE GES INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1035WRIGHTSVILLE BH, NC 28480 2113 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE GLAZIER FAMILY REV TRUST 2033 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2033 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE GLAZIER WOODROW R SAENGDUAN P 2025 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2025 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE GLAZIER WOODROW RANDALL 2025 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2023 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE GRADY LARRY2929 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2929 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE GRAY KATIE S 2918 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2918 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE GRIFFIN JOSEPH BRITTANY 3007 MEMORY LNCASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3007 MEMORY LN CASTLE HAYNE GUIDI DANIEL JOSEPH JESSICA 2921 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2921 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE HAMILTON WILLIAM J CLAUDIA 6516 SHIRE LNWILMINGTON, NC 28411 2202 OAKELY RD CASTLE HAYNE HARDIE JOHN3004 OLD BARN CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3004 OLD BARN CT  CASTLE HAYNE HERCHER THERESA M404 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 404 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE HOLT AMELIA MARTIN JAMES H2912 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2912 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE HOUCK GLORIA E407 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 407 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE HOY RUSSELL P JR 417 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 417 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE INMAN PHILIP DEVON2729 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2015 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE LEWIS ALTON RAY 1005 AVENSHIRE CIR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 3007 OAKLEY CIR  CASTLE HAYNE MARSHBURN RICHARD PEARLINE ETAL 3003 MEMORY LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3003 MEMORY LN  CASTLE HAYNE MCINTOSH JUDY 2923 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2923 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE MCKEITHAN DAVID BLUE JACKIE S 2133 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2133 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE MCKNIGHT PATRICIA A 400 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 400 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE MELTON JOHN ALEXANDER 2906 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2906 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE MERCER MELONY MOORE3908 SONDEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2026 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE MEREDITH CYNTHIA 411 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 411 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE MISHOE WILLIAM M IV 3008 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3008 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE MOORE REV COMMON TRUST 2213 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2209 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE MOORING RONNIE ROBYN KITE 2925 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2925 THATCH LN CASTLE HAYNE NORRIS ROXANNE3006 THATCH CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3006 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE OAKLEY PLANTATION112 AIRLIE RDWILMINGTON, NC 28403 2013 OAKLEY RD PARRY NICOLE SHANAI413 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 413 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE PAULTER MATTIE O3000 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3003 OAKLEY CIR  CASTLE HAYNE PAULTER MATTIE O3000 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3001 OAKLEY CIR  CASTLE HAYNE PAULTER MATTIE O3000 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2205 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE PAULTER MATTIE O3000 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3000 OAKLEY CIR  CASTLE HAYNE PELLERITE PAULA ANNE ETAL 409 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 409 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE PEREZ ALFREDO C SHEILA CARMONA 3008 OLD BARN CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3008 OLD BARN CT  CASTLE HAYNE PHILBROOK MYRA405 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 405 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE RHEW CHRISTIAN C 3008 MEMORY LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3008 MEMORY LN  CASTLE HAYNE RIVENBARK LANCEY R JR 500 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 500 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE ROGERS KATHY M420 BOUNTIFUL LN CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 420 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE ROWE MILLIE K 805 MARCH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28405 3004 THATCH CT  CASTLE HAYNE RUMPEL CHAD M ETAL 504 3RD ST NCAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 2108 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE SIMPSON JAMES C 2107 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2107 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE SOTO JOSEPH L A 3005 OLD BARN CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3005 OLD BARN CT  CASTLE HAYNE ST CLAIR MICHELE M LARRY D3101 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3007 OAKLEY CIR  CASTLE HAYNE ST CLAIR MICHELE M LARRY D3101 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 3013 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE TRINITY TABERNACLE1423 ELMA ST SPRING LAKE, NC 28390 3137 OAKLEY CIR CASTLE HAYNE TRUE VICTORY DELIVERENCE T 2 1423 ELMA ST SPRING LAKE, NC 28390  BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE TURNER STEPHEN H MARY P 2111 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2111 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE VERNON SCOTT 2126 OAKLEY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2126 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE WHITMAN FRED A DORIS H505 BRADDOCK ST WILMINGTON, NC 28409 561 BOUNTIFUL LN  CASTLE HAYNE WORRELL LINDA3183 HALLSBORO RD NWHITEVILLE, NC 28472 2117 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE WORRELL LINDA P3183 HALLSBORO RD NWHITEVILLE, NC 28472 2121 OAKLEY RD  CASTLE HAYNE Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 14 P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Transmittal May 11, 2018 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: Bountiful Village - A Performance Residential Townhome Development My clients are interested in developing a 54-unit residential community on lands within the proximity of your property. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed. A plan of the project layout is enclosed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. A meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 23rd, at the Wrightsboro Fire Station #11, 3515 N. Kerr Avenue, 6:00 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions. We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 15 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 6 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 7 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 8 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 7 - 1 9 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 2 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 2 - 9 - 1 NE W HAN O VE R C O UN T Y P LAN N IN G B O AR D R E Q UE S T F OR B OAR D AC T IO N ME E T IN G D AT E : 7/12/2018 R egular D E PART ME N T: P lanning P R E S E N T E R (S ): Brad S chuler, C urrent P lanner C O N TAC T (S ): Brad S c huler; Ben And rea, C urrent P lanning & Zoning S up ervisor; Ken Vafier, P lanning Manager; and Wayne C lark, P lanning & Land Us e Directo r S UB J E C T: P ublic Hearing Rezoning Request (Z18-10) - Request by Design S olutions on behalf of the property owner, J ames S teele Williams, III, to rezone approximately 5 acres of land located in the 4300 block of Castle Hayne Road from R-20, Residential District, to (C ZD) B-2, C onditional Highway B usiness District, in order to develop a landscaping business. B R IE F S UMMARY: Design S olutions , o n b ehalf of the property owner, James S teele Williams , I I I , is reques ting to rezone approximately 5 ac res of land lo cated in the 4300 C astle Hayne R o ad fro m R -20 to (C ZD) B-2 in o rd er to develo p a landsc ap e c o ntracting bus iness. T he property is p ro p o s ed to b e us ed as a management offic e for the bus ines s and a s taging area fo r employees prior to leaving for off-s ite jobs. T he rear portio n of the p ro p erty, approximately 500 feet in length, will remain undisturbed and p res erve the exis ting vegetation. T he ap p licant has p ro vided trip generatio n es timates for the proposed d evelopment. T he p ro p o s al is not exp ected to generate mo re than 100 peak hour trip s and therefore, ac c o rd ing to S ec tion 61.4 of the Zoning O rdinanc e, a Traffic Imp act Analys is was not required to b e c o mp leted. Traffic impac ts will b e reviewed by NC DO T through the d riveway p ermitting proc es s . T he 2016 C o mp rehens ive Land Us e P lan classifies the s ubjec t p ro p erty as C ommunity Mixed Us e and Employment C enter. C o mmunity Mixed Use foc uses on s mall-s cale, compac t, mixed us e develo p ment p atterns that serve all mo d es of travel and ac t as an attracto r fo r c ounty res id ents and vis itors. Typ es o f appropriate uses includ e offic e, retail, mixed us e, recreatio nal, commerc ial, ins titutio nal, and multi-family and single-family residential. Employment C enter serves as employment and productio n hub s , where o ffice and light ind us trial us es are predominant. C enters can inc lude res id ential, c ivic , and rec reatio nal uses, and c o mmercial us es designed to serve the needs o f the emp lo yment center are ap p ro p riate. T he proposed land s caping bus ines s offic e is generally C O N S IS T E N T with the C omprehensive P lan b ecaus e it is a low-d ens ity co mmerc ial use that p ro vides emp loyment opportunities and is appropriately loc ated off a majo r ro ad in a trans itional area b etween high intensity nodes . S T R AT E G IC P LAN ALIG N ME N T: Intelligent G rowth and Ec o nomic Develo p ment Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 R E C O MME N D E D MO T IO N AN D R E QUE S T E D AC T ION S : S taff rec o mmends ap p ro val and s uggests the following motio n: Mo tion to rec ommend approval, as the Bo ard find s that this reques t for a zo ning map amend ment fo r approximately 5 ac res from the R -20 d is tric t, to a C o nditional B-2 d is tric t, as d es c ribed is : 1. C ons is tent with the purp o s es and intent o f the 2016 C omprehensive P lan bec ause the p ro p o s ed landsc ap ing bus iness is a lo w-dens ity c o mmercial use that provid es employment opportunities and is appropriately lo cated off a major ro ad in a trans itional area between high intens ity no d es . 2. R easonab le and in the pub lic interest b ecaus e the p ro p o s ed d evelopment will support bus iness succ es s while limiting impac ts to the surro und ing residential area b y p res erving exis ting vegetation. C ond ition: 1. All exis ting vegetatio n lo c ated within required b uffer yards mus t be p res erved and sup p lemented as necessary in order to p ro vide a fully o p aq ue s creen. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: Mo tion to rec o mmend [Ap p ro val/Denial], as the Board finds that this req ues t for a zoning map amend ment o f approximately 5 ac res from the R -20 d is tric t, to a C ond itional B-2 d is tric t, as d es cribed is : 1. [C ons is tent/No t C ons is tent] with the p urposes and intent o f the 2016 C omprehensive P lan b ecaus e [Desc rib e elements o f c o ntro lling land us e plans and how the amendment is or is no t cons is tent]. 2. [R easonab le/Not R eas o nable] and in the pub lic interest b ec aus e [Briefly explain why. F ac tors may includ e pub lic health and s afety, c harac ter of the area and relatio nship o f us es , ap p lic able plans , o r b alanc ing b enefits and detriments ]. C ond itions : [List any agreed upon c o nditio ns] C O UN T Y MAN AGE R'S C OMME N T S AN D R E C OMME N DAT ION S : (only Manager) Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z18-10) Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, James Steele Williams, III, to rezone approximately 5 acres of land located in the 4300 block of Castle Hayne Road from R-20, Residential District, to (CZD) B-2, Conditional Highway Business District, in order to develop a landscaping business. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. At this time, you may ask to either continue the application to a future meeting, or to proceed with this Board deciding whether to recommend approval or denial of the application. What do you wish to do? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why it is, or is not, reasonable and in the public interest. Staff Suggested Motion: Motion to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 5 acres from the R-20 district, to a Conditional B-2 district, as described is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed landscaping business is a low-density commercial use that provides employment opportunities and is appropriately located off a major arterial in a transitional area between high intensity nodes. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed development will support business success while limiting impacts to the surrounding residential area by preserving existing vegetation. Condition: 1. All existing vegetation located within required buffer yards must be preserved and supplemented as necessary in order to provide a fully opaque screen. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: Motion to recommend [Approval/Denial], as the Board finds that this request for a zoning map amendment of approximately 5 acres from the R-20 district, to a Conditional B-2 district, as described is: 1. [Consistent/Not Consistent] with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because [Describe elements of controlling land use plans and how the amendment is or is not consistent]. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 2. [Reasonable/Not Reasonable] and in the public interest because [Briefly explain why. Factors may include public health and safety, character of the area and relationship of uses, applicable plans, or balancing benefits and detriments]. Conditions: [List any agreed upon conditions] Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 1 of 7 STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-10 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z18-10 Request: Conditional B-2 Zoning District in order to develop a landscape contractor business. Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cindee Wolf of Design Solutions James Steele Williams, III Location: Acreage: 4300 Castle Hayne Road 5 acres PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R01700-004-028-000 Community Mixed Use & Employment Center Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Single-family dwelling Landscaping Contractor Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-20 (CZD) B-2 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single-Family Residential, Equestrian Facility R-20, RA East Single-Family Residential R-20, RA South Single-Family Residential R-20 West Single-Family Residential, Undeveloped R-20 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 1 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 2 of 7 ZONING HISTORY July 1, 1985 Initially zoned R-20 (Castle Hayne) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sewer service are not available through CFPUA. The development must be served by private well and septic. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Castle Hayne Schools Castle Hayne Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools, however the proposed commercial use will not add new students to the school system. Recreation Northern Regional Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources PROPOSED SITE PLAN  This application proposes to develop a landscape contracting business that specializes in landscape installation and lawn maintenance.  The property contains an existing single-family dwelling which is proposed to be converted to an office for the business.  In addition to the office, the business will provide a staging area for employees prior to leaving for off-site jobs. No retail activities are proposed, and per the applicant, landscaping material and debris is not intended to be stored on the site. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 2 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 3 of 7  The rear portion of the property, approximately 500 feet in length, will remain undisturbed and preserve the existing vegetation. TRANSPORTATION  Access is provided to the subject property by Castle Hayne Road (NC 133).  The proposed development must obtain a driveway permit from NCDOT. Trip Generation LAND USE (ITE Code) INTENSITY AM PEAK PM PEAK Local data based on proposed business operation. 30 Employees 40 40 *The ITE Manual does not include a specific land use classification for the proposed landscape contractor business. Therefore, the WMPO standard procedure is to use local business-specific data. The above estimated trips are based on the number of employees and operation of the business. The 40 peak hour trips estimated to be generated from the business is below the 100 trip threshold that would warrant a Traffic Impact Analysis to be conducted. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 3 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 4 of 7 Traffic Counts - 2017 Road Location Volume Capacity V/C Castle Hayne Road 4700 Block 9,854 16,200 0.61 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 4 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 5 of 7 Regional Transportation Plans: One project is included in State Transportation Improvement Program that will improve the portion of Castle Hayne Road south of I-140:  STIP Project U-5863 o Widening of Castle Hayne Road to multi-lanes from I-140 to Division Drive. Right-of- way acquisition is expected to begin in 2021 and construction is expected to begin in 2023. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses will expire if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Listed below are projects within a one-mile radius from the subject site that are currently drafting a TIA or have completed a TIA within the last five years. Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status 1. Parsons Mills  204 single-family dwellings  150 townhomes  Approved February 26, 2014  2018 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at the below instersections. The major improvements consisted of:  North College at Parmele o Installation of an eastbound right turn lane  North College at Site Access o Installation of a southbound right turn lane o Installation of a northbound left turn lane o Installation of the site access with one entering lane and two exiting lanes Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:  None Development Status: Subdivision Infrastructure Under Construction ENVIRONMENTAL  The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas, wetlands, or Natural Heritage Areas.  The property is within the Prince George Creek (C;Sw) watershed.  Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) and Class III (severe limitation) soils. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 5 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 6 of 7 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN  The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. Specific goals of the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may be relevant for particular properties. Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use & Employment Center Place Type Description Community Mixed Use: Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential. Employment Center: Serve as employment and production hubs, where office and light industrial uses are predominant. Centers can include residential, civic, and recreational uses, and commercial uses designed to serve the needs of the employment center are appropriate. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 6 Z18-10 Staff Summary PB 7.12.2018 Page 7 of 7 Analysis The subject property is located along a major road between GE, where the Comprehensive Plan envisions a high density node, and Castle Hayne’s commercial center. Several commercial operations are located along the section of the Castle Hayne corridor between Hermitage Road and Crowatan Road where this property is located, creating a small node of non-residential uses. While this property falls within both Community Mixed Use and Employment Center place types, the use itself is located in the Community Mixed Use portion of the lot. Community Mixed Use areas are generally intended to include a mixture of uses and support multiple modes of transportation. These features become more important at major intersections where mixed use nodes can be created. In transitional areas between major intersections and/or higher density nodes, lower density commercial uses that provide services for nearby residents are appropriate. This property is part of a small commercial service node with uses similar to the contractor office proposed, and this portion of the Castle Hayne corridor does serve as a transition between the higher intensity GE node and “downtown” Castle Hayne. No off-road multi-modal infrastructure is planned for this corridor. Consistency Recommendation The proposed landscaping business office is generally CONSISTENT with this place type because this type of low-density commercial use provides employment opportunities and is appropriate due to its location off a major road in a transitional area between high intensity nodes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions. Staff concludes that the application is: 1. Consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed landscaping business is a low-density commercial use that provides employment opportunities and is appropriately located off a major road in a transitional area between high intensity nodes. 2. Reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed development will support business success while limiting impacts to the surrounding residential area by preserving existing vegetation. Condition: 1. All existing vegetation located within required buffer yards must be preserved and supplemented as necessary in order to provide a fully opaque screen. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 7 HERMITAGERD C A S T L E HA Y NE R D C R O W A T A N R D C H I P D R CHE S T E R F I E L D R D G O F F D R PETER S P RI N GDR MADELINE TRAS K D R MC D O U G A L D D R OLD A V E S T R I C K S T R A D I N G P O S T L N RA R-20 I-1 I-2 O&I ® Z18-10 Parcels within 500 Feet of Case Site Case: Z18-10 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 4300 Castle Hayne Rd R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) B-2/ Landscaping Business 1,000 Feet R Physical Address 4232 CASTLE HAYNE RD 311 HERMITAGE RD 300 HERMITAGE RD 4219 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4331 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4327 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4229 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4229 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4315 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4247 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4228 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4236 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4222 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4224 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4242 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4300 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4324 CASTLE HAYNE RD 307 HERMITAGE RD 4230 CASTLE HAYNE RD 206 GOFF DR 204 GOFF DR 303 GOFF DR 304 GOFF DR 4326 CASTLE HAYNE RD 4342 CASTLE HAYNE RD 203 GOFF DR 210 CROWATAN RD Z18-10 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 3 - 1 CUD R-10 CUD I-1 B-1 O&I I-1 I-2 RA R-20 G O F F D R OLD A V E CRO W A T A N R D CAS T L E H A Y N E R D CH E S T E R F I E L D R D MADELINE TRASK D R MC D O U G A L D D R C H I P D R PET E R S P R I N G D R HERMITAGE RD ® Z18-10 Case: Z18-10 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 4300 Castle Hayne Rd R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) B-2/ Landscaping Business Zoning Districts SHOD A-I AR B-1 B-2 EDZD I-1 I-2 O&I PD R-10 R-15 R-20 R-20S R-7 RA RFMU SC Incorporated Areas Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) See Section 55.1 of the Zoning OrdinanceCOD Sewer Collector Water Distribution Main 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 4 - 1 G O F F D R OLD A V E CRO W A T A N R D CAS T L E H A Y N E R D CH E S T E R F I E L D R D MADELINE TRASK D R MC D O U G A L D D R C H I P D R PET E R S P R I N G D R HERMITAGE RD COMMERCE ZONE RURAL RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER COMMUNITY MIXED USE GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE ® Z18-10 Place Types Commerce Zone Employment Center General Residential Urban Mixed Use Community Mixed Use Rural Residential Conservation Case: Z18-10 Existing Zoning/Use:Proposed Zoning/UseSite Address: 4300 Castle Hayne Rd R-20/ Single-Family Dwelling (CZD) B-2/ Landscaping Business 1,000 Feet R Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 5 - 1 APPLICANT MATERIALS Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 6 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 6 - 2 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 1 Page 4 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: ______________________ Total Acreage of Proposed District: __________ Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ B-2 5.00 Theproposeduseisabusinessofficeandfacilitiesforalandscapecontractor.HoursofoperationareMonday thruFriday,7:00a.m.-6:30p.m.Twenty-five(25)tothirty(30)employeesarriveeachdayandmostleaveinthe eight(8)toten(10)companytrucksforoff-sitejobassignments.Administrationstaffwilloccupytheexisting structureformanagementoperations.Nonewbuildingsareproposed.Referenceattachedplanforsitelayout. AdrivewaypermitwillberequiredbytheNCDOTforsafeingress&egressfromthesite.Agravelparkingarea willbeimprovedforthecompanytrucksandemployeevehiclesleftduringthedays.Thenon-conformingsetback oftheexistingstructurewillbemitigatedwithstreetyardandfoundationplantings.Existingvegetationthroughout thetractwillbemaintainedandsupplementedasnecessarytoassurevisualbufferingbetweenandproposeduse andtheneighboringresidentialzoningdistricts. Referencetheattachedplanforsitelayout.Tripgenerationisminimal,soaTrafficImpactAnalysisisnotrequired. However,necessaryimprovementstomitigatetrafficenteringandexitingthebusinesswouldbeevaluatedby NCDOTduringreviewandapprovalofaDrivewayPermit.Existingvegetationwillbeleftundisturbedand supplementedasnecessarytoprovidevisualscreeningfromadjacentresidentialdistricts.Streetyard,interior parkingareaandfoundationplantingswillbebroughtuptocurrentOrdinancestandardsandaddtothevisual appealoftheproject. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 2 Page 5 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: _________________________________________________________________________________ Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): __________________________________ AM Peak Hour Trips: ___________________________ PM Peak Hour Trips: ______________________________ CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community-at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property’s classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ SINGLE-TENANTOFFICE (ITE-715) EMPLOYEES (30) 1615 Thegoalsforavibranteconomyencouragecontinuedeffortstoattractandretainbusinesses.Theproperty isinaruralareaoftheCounty,andotherpropertiesinthevicinityarealreadyzonedforsimilarindustrial and/ormoreruralbusinessuses.Theproposedusewillserveasinfilldevelopmentalongamajorhighway corridor. TheCommunityMixed-useplace-typefocusesondevelopmentpatternswithhigherdensities.The EmploymentCenterplace-typealsosuggeststheappropriatenessformoreindustrialusesthathavegood accessibilitytoareasoutsidetheirboundaries. Thetractlocation,narrowwidthandextensivedepthmakethepropertylessattractiveforanykindof residentialdevelopment.Althoughanenterprisesuchasawholesalenurserywouldalreadybepermittedin theexistingR-20district,landscapingcontractorfacilitiesarelimitedtobusinessandindustrialdistricts. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 3 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 4 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 5 Legal Description for  Conditional Zoning District    Beginning at a point in the southeastern boundary of Castle Hayne Road (U.S. Hwy. 117); said  point being 30 feet perpendicular from the centerline; said point also being at the common  corner between Lot 15 and Lot 16 – Castle Gardens, a division recorded among the land records  of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 2, at Page 117; and running thence:    South 32049’ East, 1318 feet to a point; thence  South 57011’ West, 165.3 feet to a point; thence  North 32049” West, 1318 feet to a point in the southeastern boundary of Castle Hayne Road;   thence with that right‐of‐way,  North 57011’ East, 165.3 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 5.00 acres,  more or less.  Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 6 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Sweetwater Landscapes Proposed Zoning: R-20 to (CZD) I-1 The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on May 30, 2018 . A copy of the written notice is also attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Monday, June 11, 2018; 6:30 p.m.; on-site at 4300 Castle Hayne Road. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in List The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief explanation of the purpose of conditional rezoning was given. The only question by an adjacent property owner to the rear was concerning vegetation clearing and buffering. They were shown notes on the plan that define the limits of disturbance. As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: None Date: June 12, 2018 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 7 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 8 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 3 - 7 - 9 OW N E R M A I L I N G   A D D R E S S C I T Y   /   S T A T E   /   Z I P P I N S I T U S   A D D R E S S AS H C R A F T   J O H N   S 4 2 2 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 .6 2 . 4 0 7 9 4 2 2 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D BL A C K M A N   J O H N   M P O   B O X   1 2 9 2 3 W I L M I N G T O N ,   N C   2 8 4 0 5 3 2 2 1 1 5 . 6 2 . 4 8 2 4 4 2 47 CASTLE HAYNE RD CA Y T O N   W I L M A   S   H E I R S 4 3 2 4   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 32 2 1 1 9 . 7 2 . 3 3 3 1 4 3 2 4   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D CH I C K E N   C O O P   E N T E R P R I S E S   L L C 4 2 2 9   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   NC   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 5 . 6 2 . 3 5 4 8 4 2 2 9   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D DE G I F F A R D E   C L A U D I O   G W E N D O L Y N 3 0 7   H E R M I T A G E   R D   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 84 2 9 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 1 . 5 1 7 1 3 0 7   H E R M I T A G E   R D DU P R I E S T   M A U D E   R E E   H E I R S P O   B O X   5 8 0 C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 72 . 0 0 9 7 4 2 4 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D FL O U R N O Y   L A I R D   T   B R E N D A   C   M I L L E R 7 5 3 1   C A R O L I N A   B E A C H   R D   W I L M I N G T ON ,   N C   2 8 4 0 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 7 2 . 0 0 1 1 4 2 3 6   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D FR E Y   L I N D E N   B 4 3 2 7   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 5 . 7 3. 1 2 8 8 4 3 2 7   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D GO F F   T H O M A S   E   I I I   R E V   L I V   T R S T 6 3 0 0   M O S S Y   R O C K   C T   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   NC   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 6 2 . 7 2 2 0 4 3 2 6   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D GU N N I N G   M A T T H E W   E D W I N 3 0 4   G O F F   D R   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 2. 9 1 2 3 3 0 4   G O F F   D R HO W A R D   J U L I U S   F   R U B Y   S 1 2 1 1   M O X I E   W A Y W I L M I N G T O N ,   N C   2 8 4 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 81 . 6 5 4 4 2 1 0   C R O W A T A N   R D JO H N S O N   R   C H A R L E S   B A R B A R A 31 1   H E R M I T A G E   R D C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 8 0 . 0 8 1 1 3 1 1   H E R M I T A GE RD KA P C O R ,   L L C 5 9 0 9   H O L L Y H O L M   T R A C E W I L M I N G T O N ,   N C   2 8 4 0 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 6 2 . 2 4 77 4 2 1 9   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D KO R N E G A Y   R O N A L D   E   N I N A   M 4 2 4 1   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 42 9 3 2 2 1 1 5 . 5 2 . 8 7 7 5 4 2 2 9   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D MA Y   B   G R A D Y   H R S 1 0 5 3   B R I D G E R   L N   F O R E S T ,   V A   2 4 5 5 1 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 2 . 9 0 8 3 3 0 3 GOFF DR ME A D O W S   P A U L   D E A N N E 4 7 1 7   I N D I A N   C O R N   T R A I L C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 32 2 1 1 5 . 6 3 . 8 3 4 3 4 3 3 1   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D MU L L I N S   D A V I D   W A Y N E 2 0 4   R E N W O O D   C I R   W I L M I N G T O N ,   N C   2 8 4 0 5 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 7 1. 2 5 2 8 4 2 3 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D MU L L I N S   M I N N I E 4 2 3 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 6 .7 2 . 5 7 9 4 4 2 3 0   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D MU L L I N S   W I L L I A M   R I L E Y   M I C H E L E   L 4 2 2 8   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D   C A S T L E   H A Y N E,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 6 2 . 7 2 2 0 4 2 2 8   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D OP E N   H A N D S   F A R M   L L C 3 4 1 8   P R I N C E   G E O R G E   A V E   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 5 . 6 3 . 6 1 5 5 4 3 1 5   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D RA M S E Y   V I R G I N I A   S 4 0 2   M I L L E R   R D T E L F O R D ,   T N   3 7 6 9 0 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 2 . 9 2 2 9 2 0 3 GOFF DR SA N T I A G O   A D E L A I D A   H E R N A N D E Z   E T A L 2 0 4   G O F F   D R   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 42 9 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 2 . 7 3 3 1 2 0 6   G O F F   D R SA N T I A G O   A D E L A I D A   H E R N A N D E Z   E T A L 2 0 4   G O F F   D R   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 42 9 3 2 2 1 2 0 . 7 2 . 8 4 3 0 2 0 4   G O F F   D R TH O M A S   E   G O F F   I I I   L T D   P T N R S H P 6 3 0 0   M O S S Y   R O C K   C T C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C  2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 6 . 7 2 . 5 7 9 4 4 3 4 2   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D WA T K I N S   L E C O L O N   H   M A R Y   F R A N C E S 3 6 0 4   M A R A T H O N   A V E   C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C  2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 6 1 . 8 7 1 9 4 2 2 4   C A S T L E   H A Y N E   R D WH I T E   F A M I L Y   T R U S T 3 0 0   H E R M I T A G E   R D C A S T L E   H A Y N E ,   N C   2 8 4 2 9 3 2 2 1 1 9 . 70 . 0 9 6 7 3 0 0   H E R M I T A G E   R D Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 3 - 7 - 1 0 P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Transmittal May 30, 2018 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: Sweetwater Landscapes Sweetwater Landscapes is an established landscape installation & maintenance company in the Triangle area, and wishes to locate another office here in Wilmington. They are interested in using the structure and lands at 4300 Castle Hayne Road for their local facility. The parcel is within the proximity of your property. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. A meeting will be held on Monday, June 11th, at the site, 4300 Castle Hayne Road, 6:30 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 620- 2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions. We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 11 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d - J u l y 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 IT E M : 3 - 7 - 1 2 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 13 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 8 - 1 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 8 - 2 Planning Board - July 12, 2018 ITEM: 3 - 9 - 1