Loading...
Z20-04 Holly Grove Townhomes Application Package 2.6.2020Page 4 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: ______________________ Total Acreage of Proposed District: __________ Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ CZD /R-5 3.00 AC. PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION W/ TWENTY-TWO (22) TOWNHOME-STYLE RESIDENCES ** HOMES WILL BE ACCESSED FROM HIDDEN VALLEY DR., A PUBLIC STREET ROW, BY A PRIVATE DRIVE. ** HOMES WILL BE 2-3 BEDROOM, MAXIMUM TWO-STORY, AND HAVE 1-CAR GARAGES. ** PROJECT WILL BE SERVICED BY CFPUA WITH CONNECTION TO PUBLIC WATER & SANITARY SEWER MAINS. ** REFERENCE SITE PLAN FOR SITE LAYOUT & IMPROVEMENTS Page 5 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: _________________________________________________________________________________ Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): __________________________________ AM Peak Hour Trips: ___________________________ PM Peak Hour Trips: ______________________________ CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community-at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property’s classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE /ITE CODE 230 CALCULATED PER 22 DWELLING UNITS 10 11 The policies for growth and development encourage safe and affordable housing to be available to every citizen. Sustainability of the County depends on sensible in-fill and maximizing use of lands already accessible to urban services. The tract is identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as a Community Mixed-use place type. The plan suggests higher densities to support the small-scale, compact development patterns that the place type promotes. The proposed townhome development is an acceptable transition between the busy highway corridor and the more established single-family housing beyond the boundary of the tract. The property had previously been designed for a religious institution, but those plans never came to fruition. S. College Road is a thoroughfare of the community. Single-family residences are less attractive along very busy traffic corridors. A denser housing style makes infill possible with better affordability. Legal Description for  Conditional Zoning District        Beginning at a point at the intersection of the northern boundary of Hidden Valley Drive (S.R.  1704), a variable width public right‐of‐way, with the eastern boundary of South College Road  (N.C. Hwy. 132), a 200’ public right‐of‐way; said point being shown on the plat for Hidden Valley  – Section 1, recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book  18, at Page 50; and running thence from the beginning with the South College Road right‐of‐ way,    North 01019’58” West, 266.81 feet to a point; thence  South 74057’02” East, 504.24 feet to a point; thence  South 01019’58” West, 266.81 feet to a point in the northern boundary of Hidden Valley Road;   Thence with that right‐of‐way,  North 74057’02” West, 504.24 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 130,699  square feet, or 3.00 acres, more or less.    REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Hidden Valley Road Townhomes Proposed Zoning: R-15 to R-5 (CZD) The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on January 16, 2020 . A copy of that written notice and a list of recipients are attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, January 28, 2020, 6:00 p.m.; at the Arab Shrine Club, 4510 S. College Road. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in List and attached emails received. The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A presentation was given on the proposed project, how it relates to the Comp Plan and the particulars about Conditional Zoning Districts. The majority of the conversation revolved around flooding in the vicinity of The Hidden Valley Drive intersection with S. College Rd, stormwater management, traffic and overall development density. The majority of attendees were strongly opposed to any infill other than 3-4 single-family homes – although it was explained that up to eight (8) residential units are permitted, by-right, as the tract exists today in the R-15 district, and that there are no restrictions on the housing style under the “performance” standards. As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the petition: No changes were made to the concept layout of eighteen (18) units, but the plan has been better detailed and labeled for submittal. Date: February 3, 2020 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf 1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:Michael Troja <michael.troja315@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, January 26, 2020 4:36 PM To:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Subject:Development @ Hidden Valley and S. College I find your proposal appalling .This type of compressed building would destroy this neighborhood. The appeal of living in  a wooded single family home development brought me here 11 years ago, and I've enjoyed the character of this area  ever since. this sort of careless development is what destroyed areas like northern New Jersey generations ago. There is  a reason for the zoning being the way it is , and many of us here on Hidden Valley are here because we all have a little  room on adequate size lots. 20 more households would affect trafffic and conjestion, and drive down the property  values of those nearest to this unatractive proposal.  Michael Troja owner 315 Hidden Valley Rd.   1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:Suzanne Hutchinson <malvern1213@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 28, 2020 2:03 PM To:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Subject:Hidden Valley Rd Hello,  I am sorry I will not be able to attend the meeting tonight in regards to to the rezoning of Hidden Valley Rd.  I am very much opposed to this plan. I think the present zoning should be kept in place for the good of this  neighborhood!       Suzanne Hutchinson         330 Hidden Valley Rd.        910‐232‐2766lo    Sent from my iPhone  1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:Patrick M. Erwin <tropicalreef@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, January 26, 2020 11:37 PM To:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Cc:Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam Subject:Re: Hidden Vally Road Townhouse Development Dear Mrs. Wolfe,    Thank you for the quick response and additional information. I am certainly no development/zoning expert and  appreciate the clarifications.     It is good to hear thoughtful consideration of logistics regarding traffic, utilities and stormwater. The information I  received indicated 22 townhome units, not 2, but I imagine these considerations hold true. I can say that inadequate  ditching is a major concern on our street, as many have filled in and flood (including our front yard) with even moderate  rainfall.     It is less encouraging that the argument for being an asset to our community consists of being less negative than other  options ‐ less traffic than a place of worship, or a commercial building. Or being only possibly negative ‐ not “necessarily"  decreasing property values. If the land is to be developed, why not develop consistent with the zone and area that  already characterizes our neighborhood and the surrounding ones?     Most consistent with current land usage would be a few single‐family home plots. I have no doubt that new residents  are looking for different housing options, but I do doubt that this area has the pedestrian access to businesses and public  transportation required by this demographic. Crosswalks and walk/bike paths are popping up north of us, but are not  accessible to our neighborhood.    All in all, this just seems out of place, and presumably it must be considered so from a development standpoint since re‐ zoning is needed to change the land usage ‐ as far as I understand.    Thank you again for your time and consideration.    Best regards,    Patrick      On Jan 26, 2020, at 11:31 AM, cwolf@lobodemar.biz wrote:    We appreciate your comments.  I’ll offer some explanation.     Traffic:  Hidden Valley Road is a NCDOT‐maintained public street (SR #1704), and certainly adequate to handle  the trips generated from just 2 townhomes.  It already has the advantages of a dedicated taper & right‐ turn lane from the South and a “left‐over” for turns from the North.  The original plan for this site was a  church, which probably would have introduced more traffic overall – albeit at more concentrated  times.  As you can imagine, property with frontage along a busy thoroughfare could be attractive to a  multitude of uses – many more intense.  We feel that a residential project is much more appropriate  than office(s) or something commercially oriented at the entry into your neighborhood.     2 Utilities:  There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in  Wedgefield Drive.  We would be extending that service into this project.  There would not be a septic  system.  Of course the water service will come from the main in Hidden Valley Road.     Stormwater Management:  As is often the case with older neighborhoods, such as Hidden Valley, there were no stormwater  detention requirements when they were developed.  All new development must meet pre‐ / post‐  runoff standards – meaning that all surfaces created must drain to a pond or other management facility  that is sized to control drainage such that the runoff cannot leave the site any differently than it does  today in its natural state.  We have completed preliminary calculations for the pond area that is shown  on the exhibit.  Overflow in larger storm events would drain into the highway ditch along S College Road,  and then routes southward to the Motts Creek drainageway ultimately towards the Cape Fear  River.  New Hanover County has recently enacted a stormwater utility program.  That will be intended to  assist in remedying existing issues with inadequate ditching – such as you’ve described.     Value:  New development, even at a greater density, does not necessarily affect surrounding property values  adversely.  It’s normal to transition density between a busy road corridor and older established  subdivision.  New construction to more current building codes and with more sustainable materials  often enhances values in a neighborhood, because of the higher sale prices in the market today.  New  residents to Wilmington are looking for alternative living styles to the classic single‐family home on a  larger lot that entails more maintenance.  With garages, these townhomes are considered more up‐ scale.  They will be marketed to individual owners and maintenance of the stormwater pond and all  common areas the responsibility of a homeowners’ association.              Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have other questions.  Thank you.     Cindee Wolf  Tel. 910‐620‐2374        From: Patrick Erwin <tropicalreef@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Patrick M. Erwin  Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 9:41 AM  To: cwolf@lobodemar.biz  Subject: Hidden Vally Road Townhouse Development     Dear Mrs. Wolf,    I am contacting regarding your letter informing my neighborhood of the pending townhouse  development project on Hidden Valley Road. I appreciate the notification and opportunity to attend to  impacted property owners meeting this Tuesday.     In the letter, you indicate that the developer looks forward to being an asset to our community. Can you  provide any specifics on how the development will positively impact our neighborhood?      Our initial reaction is that such a high‐density development in a single‐family home neighborhood is out  of place and would cause logistical issues (e.g. increased traffic, water drainage problems).    Thank you for your time and consideration.    Best regards,  3 Patrick M. Erwin  —————  437 Hidden Valley Road  (910) 619‐5401    1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:Yopp, Emily Ann <Emily.Yopp@ncr.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:34 PM To:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Subject:Hidden Valley Road Development To whom it may concern, I am a homeowner on Hidden Valley road in Wilmington, NC. I would like to strongly OPPOSE the development of the proposed 22 unit townhome community. I have small children and I am concerned about the influx of traffic to the area, and our street being used more as a ‘cut through’. With the increase traffic, this causes concern for the safety of my children at the school bus stop. I also encounter heavy flooding and I am concerned that this development will cause increased flooding to my property. Thank you for your time. Emily Yopp Get Outlook for iOS 1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Sent:Monday, January 27, 2020 9:36 AM To:'Julian' Cc:Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam (carolusbuildingco@gmail.com) Subject:RE: Hidden Valley Road proposal Mr. March,    1. There will certainly be sidewalks within the community, and to include one along the frontage(s) could be a  condition of approval.  There are long‐range plans by the County for a multi‐use trail along College Road –  similar to what has been installed from 17th Street to Holly Tree by the City of Wilm – from approximately the  location of the old Monkey Junction library up to 17th Street.  The issue would be whether it will be located on  the East or West side of the busy road.  Crosswalks would obviously need to be located at signalized  intersection.  2. There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in Wedgefield  Drive.  We would be extending that service into this project, but any further extension eastward onto Hidden  Valley Road would be a project for the CFPUA.  The depth of the existing manhole invert is not adequate for  positive flow for more than 500‐600 linear feet.    3. An “attached” housing development is required to meet all landscape regulations in the NHCo Ordinance for  street yard, interior shading and buffer plantings.  Regulated trees can only be removed for essential site  improvements – buildings, streets, stormwater & utilities.  Trees within around the perimeter of the site would  certainly be preserved, and supplemented as necessary to provide the full planting requirements – along with  the aesthetics desired for new homes.    Please do not hesitate to re‐contact me if you have additional questions.  Thank you.  Cindee          From: Julian <jmarchnews@gmail.com>   Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:25 PM  To: cwolf@lobodemar.biz  Subject: Hidden Valley Road proposal    Good afternoon Cindee,    I received your letter with information on the proposal for the lot at the corner of Hidden Valley Road/South College  Road. I'm not sure yet if I will be able to attend the meeting Tuesday, but did have a couple of questions/comments for  you.     1. Is there a sidewalk planned alongside the Hidden Valley Road portion of the proposed development? It seems this  would be prudent if there would be additional foot traffic on that section of the road to keep pedestrians safely away  from vehicular traffic. Because of the center median in that section of the road, cars cannot move over to the oncoming  lane if pedestrians are in the roadway.     2. It is my understanding the first block of Hidden Valley Road (between South College and Rushing Drive) remains still  on septic systems while surrounding areas are on CFPUA sewer service. If the development were to move forward, do  you know if that would mean CFPUA would extend sewer service to the 600 block of Hidden Valley?     3. I see some additional landscaping trees are planned in the rendering. If the development moved forward, would all  the existing trees be removed, or would some trees be left behind?   1 cwolf@lobodemar.biz From:cwolf@lobodemar.biz Sent:Friday, January 24, 2020 4:51 PM To:'thomas lackey' Cc:Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam (carolusbuildingco@gmail.com) Subject:RE: A Performance Residential Townhome Development Mr. Lackey,  We appreciate your comments.  I’ll offer some explanation.    On the traffic issue:  Hidden Valley Road is a NCDOT‐maintained public street (SR #1704), and certainly adequate to handle the trips  generated from just 2 townhomes.  It already has the advantages of a dedicated taper & right‐turn lane from the South  and a “left‐over” for turns from the North.  The original plan for this site was a church, which probably would have  introduced more traffic overall – albeit at more concentrated times.  As you can imagine, property with frontage along a  busy thoroughfare could be attractive to a multitude of uses – many more intense.  We feel that a residential project is  much more appropriate than office(s) or something commercially oriented at the entry into your neighborhood.    Utilities:  There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in Wedgefield Drive.  We  would be extending that service into this project.  There would not be a septic system.  Of course the water service will  come from the main in Hidden Valley Road.    Stormwater Management:  As is often the case with older neighborhoods, such as Hidden Valley, there were no stormwater detention requirements  when they were developed.  All new development must meet pre‐ / post‐ runoff standards – meaning that all surfaces  created must drain to a pond or other management facility that is sized to control drainage such that the runoff cannot  leave the site any differently than it does today in its natural state.  We have completed preliminary calculations for the  pond area that is shown on the exhibit.  Overflow in larger storm events would drain into the highway ditch along S  College Road, and then routes southward to the Motts Creek drainageway ultimately towards the Cape Fear River.  New  Hanover County has recently enacted a stormwater utility program.  That will be intended to assist in remedying existing  issues with inadequate ditching – such as you’ve described.      Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have other questions.  Thank you.    Cindee Wolf  Tel. 910‐620‐2374             From: thomas lackey <toko3781@yahoo.com>   Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 1:02 PM  To: cwolf@lobodemar.biz  Subject: A Performance Residential Townhome Development    As a adjacent property owner , located at 638 hidden valley rd, Wilmington . I do have a few concerns about your proposed development # 1 . Traffic is a concern 2 #2 . Sewer service #3 . Water run off and flooding issues I realize that we all have county water but none of have sewer , are you going to have a large septic system installed or what will you do The water runoff is a major concern .. the fist number of lots on the left of hidden valley , when you are entering hidden valley from S. College, have a large drainage ditch behind our property …….. farther down hidden valley there are flooding issues each time we have a heavy storm …. I feel that with the scope of your development we would be affected in a negative way ., especially in regards to the water , drainage issues . Regards Thomas Lackey PO Box 6 Vale, NC 28168 NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP SITUS ADDRESSALI MOHAMAD A SHAMIEH 4709 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4709 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTONALTAMIRANO ALVARO & MARIA SOSA 5909 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5909 TROPIC CT  WILMINGTONAPPLEWHITE CARLOS M COLLEEN 4665 ANDROS LN  #200 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4665 ANDROS LN  WILMINGTONARNOLD KAREN MICHAEL 170 HARLEYVILLE RD SALTVILLE, VA 24370 653 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON AV HOLDINGS LLC 100 AQUA VISTA DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4580 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON BENBASSAT SABRINA 4669 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4669 ANDROS LN  WILMINGTON BENNETT TIMOTHY R 5003 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5003 BLUE GRASS CT  WILMINGTON BERRY BRUCE 708 CROWS NEST CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BESNER REJEAN NATHALIA 9317 KITE ST BURKE, VA 22015 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BLACKMAN PATRICK DECIA JOHN 4612 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4612 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON BLACKMORE CORONADA 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BOVA DAVID A SHEILA M11 STRATTON CIR TROY, NY 12182 4564 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON CLUCAS ASHLEY B 4708 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4708 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON CPGPI STILL MEADOW LLC 1330 SAINT MARYS ST STE 1 RALEIGH, NC 27605 4632 STILL MEADOW DR WILMINGTON CREECH FREDERICK E BEVERLY L 4707 WOODS EDGE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4707 WOODS EDGE DR  WILMINGTON CUNLIFFE JOSEPH D KATHLEEN M 645 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 645 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON DORAN KELLY 5001 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5001 RANCHWOOD CT  WILMINGTON FERDINANDO KEITH 5116 TREYBROOKE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 649 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON FINCANNON DAVID L LISA P 4607 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4607 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON FIRST STEP LLC 8909 BLUFF CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON GARRISON MICHAEL R ETAL 654 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 654 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON GOODMAN RODNEY ETAL 4576 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4576 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON GRIFFIN TIMOTHY A JILL RENEE 5002 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5002 RANCHWOOD CT  WILMINGTON GRUNDMAN WARREN J 661 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 661 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON GULISH KRISTIN 4566 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4566 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON HALL NOVELLA 669 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 669 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON HALL SUSAN ANNETTE 650 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 650 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON HILL LINCOLN GLORIA S 4617 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4617 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON HOWARD JASON W 4586 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4586 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON JARVIS HAROLD W JENNIFER R 4608 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4608 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON JEWEL MICHAEL C TAMMY B 637 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 637 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON JOHNSON LINDA C TITUS D 4616 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4616 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON JOHNSTON BARBARA S 4578 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4578 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON KEENAN MICHAEL J SR DIANE P 4700 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4700 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON KEGLEY GEOFFREY G ROBIN M 5912 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5912 WINDJAMMER DR  WILMINGTON KELLY WALTER L DAISY W 4701 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4701 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON KINNEY MICHAEL R ROBIN S 646 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 646 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON KRUEGER CHARLES C ETAL 657 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 657 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON KUHNE JUANITA S 5000 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5000 BLUE GRASS CT  WILMINGTON LACKEY THOMAS R JUDY L 924 MOUNT CALVARY LN VALE, NC 28168 638 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON LAROSE KENNETH E KOREEN M 4604 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4604 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON LAWRENCE JERRY KAREN 6040 MARION POINT CT BELEWS CREEK, NC 27009 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON MAJAC PROPERTIES LLC 3600 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON MANNING RICHARD RACHEL 5000 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5000 RANCHWOOD CT  WILMINGTON MCCARTHY BRIAN ETAL 4705 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4705 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON MEEHL JOHN B CATHERINE M 4704 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4704 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON MILLER WALTER J II RITA L 4712 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4712 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON MUTHAIAH MUTHUVEL RAMYA 8012 WADE GREEN PL CARY, NC 27519 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON NOLES LLOYD G TERESA A 4620 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4620 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON PALESE EILEEN J 4667 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4667 ANDROS LN  WILMINGTON POWELL MORRIS F JR KAREN S 5002 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5002 BLUE GRASS CT  WILMINGTON RIGDON RONALD JR STACEY 5005 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5005 BLUE GRASS CT  WILMINGTON RISLEY RYAN 665 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 665 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON RIVERA DONNA A ETAL 4568 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4568 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON SAVIANO CLAUDIO 5911 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5911 TROPIC CT  WILMINGTON SAYLORS WATCH HOA 3530 LEWIS LOOP BOLIVIA, NC 28422 4590 EXUMA LN  WILMINGTON SELVARAJ PUNJAI UMARANI 403 CARRIAGE WOODS CIR CARY, NC 27607 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON SHARPE JEFFREY L SHAWN W PO BOX 217 ALAMANCE, NC 27201 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON SIMPSON COLIN W 641 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 641 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON SMITH ELIZABETH C 5001 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5001 BLUE GRASS CT  WILMINGTON SOUZA WELLINGTON JOANNA 4716 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4716 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON SPEARS GRANT H 2540 BATCHELDER ST APT 3E BROOKLYN, NY 11235 4613 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON STAUF MARGUERITE D 642 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 642 HIDDEN VALLEY RD  WILMINGTON STOWE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 15773 WILMINGTON, NC 28408 5912 TROPIC CT  WILMINGTON SURESH BABU VIMALA 516 CARRIAGE WOODS CIR RALEIGH, NC 27607 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON TEAGARDEN APRIL 4600 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4600 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON THOMA DAWN M 3500 BAILIWYCK WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5917 WINDJAMMER DR  WILMINGTON TRINITY REFORMED ORTHODOX CHURCH 3801 WILSHIRE BLVD WILMINGTON, NC 28403 4725 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON TROUT ROBB KACEY L 5916 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5916 WINDJAMMER DR  WILMINGTON VALDIRI ERNESTO MARTHA GARAY 3901 WILLOWICK PARK DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON WEDGEFIELD/CROSSWINDS SO HOA 4744 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4602 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON WILLIAMS ANGELO D ANITA M B 4713 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4713 WEDGEFIELD DR  WILMINGTON P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Transmittal January 16, 2020 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: A Performance Residential Townhome Development My clients are interested in developing a 22-unit residential community on lands within the proximity of your property. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed. A plan of the project layout is enclosed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. A meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 28th, at the Arab Shrine Club, 4510 S. College Road, 6:00 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910-620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions. We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community.