The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 2020 02-03NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC 28401 Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair I Patricia Kusek, Vice -Chair junathan Barfield, Jr. , Commissioner I Woody White, Commissioner I Rob Zapple, Commissioner Chris Coudriet, County Manager I Wanda Copley, County Attorney I Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board FEBRUARY 3, 2020 4:00 PM MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Julia Olson - Boseman) INVOCATION (Reverend Wes Hunter, Masonboro Baptist Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Vice -Chair Patricia Kusek) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Award of Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Audit Contract 3. Adoption of Children's Dental Health Month Proclamation 4. Adoption of Heart Health Awareness Month Proclamation 5. Approval of Four Donations for Accession into the Museum's Permanent Collection 6. Approval of Four Items to be Deaccessioned from the Museum's Permanent Collection 7. Approval of December 2019 Tax Collection Reports 8. Approval of Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real Property ESTI MATED MINUTES REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 10 9. Cape Fear Public Utility Authority Annual Report 40 10. Public Hearing NOTE: Applicant has Requested a Continuance Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, I nc. on Behalf of the Property Owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39 Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to Construct a Residential Development Consisting of Multi- Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing 40 11. Public Hearing Text Amendment Request (TA19 -04) - Request by New Hanover County to Amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Damage Prevention Ordinance -the Proposed Amendment Will Clarify Provisions to Reflect Current Practice and Reorganize and Consolidate the Separate Codes into a Unified Development Ordinance PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes) ESTI MATED MINUTES ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 5 12. Consideration of a Resolution to Honor the Service and Sacrifice of Antonio 1. "Tony" Moore 5 13. Presentation of Letter from Governor Roy Cooper Thanking New Hanover County for Re- establishing the New Hanover County Commission for Women 15 14. Consideration of Wave I nterlocal Agreement Amendment 2 15. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney 16. ADJOURN Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Mission New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow. Vision A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come. Core Values Integrity - Accountability - Professionalism - Innovation - Stewardship Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY. Approve minutes from the following meeting: Regular Meeting held on January 21, 2020 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher and Martha Wayne, Deputy Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Award of Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Audit Contract BRIEF SUMMARY: At the February 2, 2015 meeting, after a request for proposal process had been completed, the Commissioners adopted a resolution awarding the audit services contract to Cherry Bekaert LLP for fiscal year 2014 -2015 with the option to renew the contract for each of the following four fiscal years based upon satisfactory performance each year. Each of these renewals have been utilized by the County. A one -year extension is being requested to authorize Cherry Bekaert LLP to complete the audit for an amount of $80,350 for fiscal year ending 2019 -2020. An additional $3,750 will be charged per program if more than seven single audit programs are required to be audited. The County intends to issue a request for proposal for the 2020 -2021 fiscal year end audit services contract. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the one -year extension to award the audit services contract to Cherry Bekaert LLP for fiscal year 2019 -2020. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Phillip Tarte, Health Director CONTACT(S): Kathy Stoute, Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Children's Dental Health Month Proclamation BRIEF SUMMARY. Health and Human Services has submitted a proclamation to recognize February as Children's Dental Health Month in New Hanover County. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the proclamation. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the future is, to a large measure, dependent on the good health of our families; and WHEREAS, good health can be achieved in part through good dental habits learned early and reinforced throughout life; and WHEREAS, dental cavities are the most common chronic disease found in children; and WHEREAS, good oral health habits start in childhood; and WHEREAS, brushing twice daily using toothpaste with fluoride, flossing daily, having routine check -ups, and eating a diet low in sugary foods and drinks help prevent tooth decay; and WHEREAS, an oral health literate and educated public is more empowered to embrace healthy oral hygiene and dietary behaviors and to make and keep dental appointments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that February 2020 will be recognized as "Children's Dental Health Month" in New Hanover County. ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Phillip Tarte, Health Director CONTACT(S): Kathy Stoute, Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Heart Health Awareness Month Proclamation BRIEF SUMMARY. Health and Human Services has submitted a proclamation to recognize February as Heart Health Awareness Month in New Hanover County. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the proclamation. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEART HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, the annual celebration of Heart Health Awareness Month began in 1963 to encourage all Americans to join the battle against heart and cardiovascular disease; and WHEREAS, protecting heart health encompasses all cardiovascular health including risk for strokes and other cardiovascular conditions; and WHEREAS, one in three adult women has some form of cardiovascular disease and heart disease is responsible for one in five adult deaths; and WHEREAS, nearly one in six adults with high blood pressure do not know that they have this risk factor for heart and cardiovascular disease; and WHEREAS, 80% of strokes can be prevented by adopting healthy habits; and WHEREAS, February is also the American Heart Association's Go Red for Women campaign because heart disease impacts women's lives as much as it impacts men's lives; and WHEREAS, National Wear Red Day for 2020 will be celebrated on February 7, 2020; and WHEREAS, New Hanover County Health and Human Services is committed to reducing the risks and detrimental effects of heart and cardiovascular disease for all our residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that February 2020 will be recognized as "Heart Health Awareness Month" in New Hanover County. ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Museum PRESENTER(S): Heather Yenco, Museum Curator CONTACT(S): Heather Yenco SUBJECT: Approval of Four Donations for Accession into the Museum's Permanent Collection BRIEF SUMMARY: The Museum collects objects pertaining to the history, science, and cultures of the Lower Cape Fear region. Submitted for approval are for donations to be added to the Museum's permanent collection. Donations are carefully documented. The Curator reviews each item's provenance, condition, relevance to the collection, potential for exhibition, and room required for storage. A report on each object is reviewed carefully by the Director and Collection's Committee. The objects presented have passed this scrutiny and were approved at the Museum Advisory Board meeting on January 15, 2020. Child's costume, 1930s Marionette, 1950s Movie set IDs, parking passes, and photographs, 1990s Letters regarding an escaped slave, 1850 Each item offered has a special story to preserve and they help to document 300 years of the region's history. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Accept four donations of regional artifacts into the Cape Fear Museum's Permanent Collection. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 5 NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting OBJ. DATE OBJECTS PROVENANCE / MISSION 1932 - costume This costume was worn by a 1St grader at Tileston Elementary School. 1950s - marionette doll This marionette doll was used by a local child. P� 1 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1 NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting 1980s -2000s - 4 ID badges -4 parking passes -2 photographs These badges and passes were used by R. Collins while working as a carpenter on various movie sets. He is photographed with the crew of The Crow. (Props constructed by Collins were approved for acquisition 12/16/2019.) i l b "S. II1a� I CAI(0LCO STUDIOS INC. RONNIECOLLINS COLLINS, RONALD CARPENTER CARPENTE C R �T MERRIMACK VALLEY FILMS RA I "RADIGLAND MURDERS" 1 LULDA PRWI6T— RAD 075 jjBADGE MUST BE DIIPLATE llAWTCNMF OE DISITATED WHEN ENTERING FACILITY wIICN N ZIND FACT -D, = e S3 CR E E M G EM S MUST BE DISPLAY E D WHEN ENTERING FACILITY PARKING PERMIT C06.6.% S-000 00 frLR*EE NC ESMS MUST BE DISPLAYED WHEN ENTERING FACILITY PARKING PERMIT 61IMS I : ".0"N' tjr. 4 4 SCR, ENNE/f I s T � .spy MUST BE DISPLAYED WHEN ENTERING FACILITY PARKING PERMIT 105 � 9 IIc)ay 5 C'RE EN GEfMS o MUST BE DISPLAYED WHEN ENTERING FACILITY PARKING PERMIT, ins 2 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 2 WWr- 159 RONALD COLLINS PREP MAKER WHEN VE MERE CULDRED WIMP R .E ENFERTAIXHENT 1111113E M115T BE DISPLAYED WHEN ENTERING FACILITY NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting 1849 -1850 -2 letters These letters were written to W. Bettencourt of Wilmington, one from the mayor of Norfolk and the other from an enslaved person named George. They document George's failed attempt to escape enslavement. 3 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 3 4- -Z - � ry.t• ftrF3.,,.: Wiz: -: 8., 6...< d.�,?'..� /.gp�.1•dJ.., �Q � �..s..- %ry4Y.� .✓�..Yac[z /�.S. t._O�'_N. aT /C'—i �°�9 � _ �m[U'�ibi .O.wC�Lrif fry pCss �,'v...0 f y ✓� X � �. � - .i�s�✓t�. Vii} <.,e.. J�as.�L7w.a r-Sy� .-� t .1L? � ,( w..w•e.� - rte/ ✓�G � I --zz.2 s%_e, A-/f�- >t °GeZ,'.� a'�..Z —e 5 .psi IT.Pe .., �eL „: w..+•v fs�s- �- /NF+ns.e- NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Museum PRESENTER(S): Heather Yenco, Museum Curator CONTACT(S): Heather Yenco SUBJECT: Approval of Four Items to be Deaccessioned from the Museum's Permanent Collection BRIEF SUMMARY: Museum staff and the Museum Advisory Board have been diligently culling items from the permanent collection that have no relevant provenance, are in very poor condition, or are duplicates of better examples. This process is a recommended step in effective collections management. The items recommended for deaccession have all been reviewed by the Curator, Director, Collections Committee, and the Museum Advisory Board at their meeting on January 15, 2020. Recommendations for disposition are also provided. Items identified for destruction are because they are in such poor and deteriorating condition they have no value. Most items are identified for public auction, a procedure which removes the sale from immediate conflict of interest with the Museum. Income earned from items sold at auction goes into a restricted account used to purchase new artifacts for the collection or to conserve objects already in the collection. An object may also be recommended for transfer to another collecting institution. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Accept the recommendation of the Museum Advisory Board to deaccession four items identified on the attached list for deaccession from the Museum's Permanent Collection. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 6 NHC Commissioners Deaccession Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting ACC. # OBJECT, DATE, DONOR, ISSUE RECOMMEND 1990.8.1 Packs of peanuts, 1989; John R. Jeffries Destruction 1990.8.4 These packs of peanuts are in poor condition. The peanuts, which are not removedu sweee'N'Souon from the packs, are coated in sugar and corn syrup, which is now discoloring the packaging. These items pose a risk in attracting pests. a rS"' 1991.127.2 Phonograph with built —in radio, about 1940; Sarah Dickinson Public auction This phonograph has parts attached to it that are not original to the object. It would not be exhibited in such condition. The museum has other phonographs in the s collection that are better suited for exhibition. 1997.1.46 Atomizer, about 1935; found in storage Public auction This atomizer was found in collections storage, with no known provenance or paper trail. The museum has other atomizers in the collection with known provenance. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Trina Lewis, Collections Supervisor CONTACT(S): Trina Lewis SUBJECT: Approval of December 2019 Tax Collection Reports BRIEF SUMMARY: NCGS 105 -350 requires the Tax Collector to submit a report showing the amount of taxes collected. Overall Collection Percentages for December 2019 are ahead of collections for December 2018 for New Hanover County and Debt Service. Fire District overall collection percentage is trending slightly behind in comparison from December 2018 to December 2019. The report for December 2019 in comparison to December 2018 is as follows: New Hanover County December 2019 December 2018 Real Property 80.52% 79.77% Personal Property 51.83% 45.10% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 78.69% 77.44% Total Collected YTD $131,478,467.35 $127,017,927.73 New Hanover County Debt Service December 2019 December 2018 Real Property 80.32% 79.11% Personal Property 51.73% 45.31% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 78.51% 76.93% Total Collected YTD $17,291,416.95 $16,602,584.15 Grand Total Collected YTD $148,769,884.30 $143,620,511.88 New Hanover County Fire District December 2019 December 2018 Real Property 84.22% 83.27% Personal Property 54.39% 58.79% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 81.39% 81.60% Total Collected YTD $8,506,463.32 $8,123,439.49 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the reports. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 New Hanover County Monthly Collection Report for December 2019 Current Year 2019 -2020 Scroll /Billed Abatements Adjustments Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined $ 146,571,779.81 $ (46,191.94) $ 10,162.95 $ 14,525,659.17 $ (168,368.56) $ 285,608.60 $ 5,841,729.32 $ $ $ 166,939,168.30 (214,560.50) 295,771.55 Total Taxes Charged Collections to Date *Refunds Write -off $ $ $ $ 146,535,750.82 118,196,429.07 199,012.43 (186.91) $ $ $ $ 14,642,899.21 7,592,816.40 4,633.75 (1,152.95) $ $ 5,841,729.32 5,841,729.32 $ $ $ $ 167,020,379.35 131,630,974.79 203,646.18 (1,339.86) Outstanding Balance $ 28,538,147.27 $ 7,053,563.61 $ - $ 35,591,710.88 Collection Percentage 80.52 926.74 51.83 $ 100.00 $ 78.69 YTD Interest Collected $ 2,244.91 $ - $ 48,893.83 $ 51,138.74 $ 1,968.03 $ 431,504.49 *Refunds $ 22,505.24 $ 7,585.15 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD 131,478,467.35 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined Scroll $ 1,461,488.76 $ 4,153,832.71 $ 497,337.43 $ 6,112,658.90 Abatements $ (4,478.39) $ (41,471.96) $ - $ (45,950.35) Adjustments $ - $ 926.74 $ 926.74 Total Levy $ 1,457,010.37 $ 4,113,287.49 $ 497,337.43 $ 6,067,635.29 Collections to Date $ 331,512.16 $ 98,024.30 $ 1,968.03 $ 431,504.49 *Refunds $ 22,505.24 $ 7,585.15 $ 506.28 $ 30,596.67 Write -off $ (22,272.83) $ (172,820.28) $ (90,505.47) $ (285,598.58) Outstanding Balance $ 1,125,730.62 $ 3,850,028.06 $ 405,370.21 $ 5,381,128.89 YTD Interest Collected $ 50,072.76 $ 15,778.71 $ 1,209.00 $ 67,060.47 Total Prior Year Collections YTD 467,968.29 Grand Total All Collections YTD $131,946,435.64 * Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1 New Hanover County Debt Service Monthly Collection Report for Decmeber 2019 Current Year 2019 -2020 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 17,291,416.95 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Motor Vehicles Combined Combined Scroll /Billed $ 19,340,467.56 $ 1,907,233.98 $ 766,467.05 $ 22,014,168.59 Abatements $ (6,095.45) $ (22,218.02) $ - $ (28,313.47) Adjustments $ 1,341.07 $ 37,688.93 $ - $ 39,030.00 Total Taxes Charged $ 19,335,713.18 $ 1,922,704.89 $ 766,467.05 $ 22,024,885.12 Collections to Date $ 15,530,379.49 $ 994,570.41 $ 766,467.05 $ 17,291,416.95 *Refunds $ 24.45 $ 24.14 $ (17.49) $ 48.59 Write -off $ (28.28) $ (155.42) 192,082.41 $ $ (183.70) Outstanding Balance $ 3,805,329.86 $ 928,003.20 $ - $ 4,733,284.47 Collection Percentage 80.32 51.73 100.00 78.51 YTD Interest Collected $ 285.27 $ - $ 6,379.69 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 17,291,416.95 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Total Prior Year Collections YTD *Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1 $ 47,924.12 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined Scroll $ 125,470.73 $ 202,521.88 $ $ 327,992.61 Abatements $ (332.95) $ (3,506.23) $ (3,839.18) Adjustments $ 122.29 $ 122.29 Total Levy $ 125,137.78 $ 199,137.94 $ $ 324,275.72 Collections to Date $ 36,373.05 $ 7,984.06 $ $ 44,357.11 *Refunds $ 459.59 $ 946.02 $ $ 1,405.61 Write -off $ (9.61) $ (17.49) $ $ (27.10) Outstanding Balance $ 89,214.71 $ 192,082.41 $ $ 281,297.12 YTD Interest Collected $ 4,125.60 $ 847.02 1 $ $ 4,972.62 Total Prior Year Collections YTD *Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1 $ 47,924.12 New Hanover County Fire District Monthly Collection Report for December 2019 Current Year 2019 -2020 Scroll /Billed Abatements Adjustments Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined $ 8,768,856.40 $ (942.05) $ 5,408.79 $ 1,224,281.14 $ 3,068.41 $ 154.62 $ 443,192.09 $ $ $ 10,436,329.63 2,126.36 5,563.41 Total Taxes Charged Collections to Date *Refunds Write -off $ $ $ $ 8,773,323.14 7,389,111.28 - (20.78) $ $ $ $ 1,227,504.17 667,520.25 - (110.40) $ $ 443,192.09 443,192.09 $ $ $ $ 10,444,019.40 8,499,823.62 (131.18) Outstanding Balance $ 1,384,191.08 $ 559,873.52 $ - $ 1,944,064.60 Collection Percentage 84.22 136.29 54.39 $ 100.00 $ 81.39 YTD Interest Collected $ 317.27 $ - $ 6,322.43 $ 6,639.70 $ 76.51 $ 21,040.46 *Refunds $ - $ 959.37 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD 8,506,463.32 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined Scroll $ 81,964.20 $ 227,599.09 $ 28,922.46 $ 338,485.75 Abatements $ (626.16) $ (2,456.01) $ (3,082.17) Adjustments $ 136.29 $ 136.29 Total Levy $ 81,338.04 $ 225,279.37 $ 28,922.46 $ 335,539.87 Collections to Date $ 15,311.81 $ 5,652.14 $ 76.51 $ 21,040.46 *Refunds $ - $ 959.37 $ 959.37 Write -off $ (771.62) $ (8,787.80) $ (4,601.66) $ (14,161.08) Outstanding Balance $ 65,254.61 $ 211,798.80 $ 24,244.29 $ 301,297.70 YTD Interest Collected $ 2,649.42 $ 794.65 $ 59.30 $ 3,503.37 Total Prior Year Collections YTD 24,543.83 Grand Total All Collections YTD $ 8,531,007.15 * Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 3 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Allison Snell, Tax Administrator CONTACT(S): Trina Lewis, Collectons Supervisor SUBJECT: Approval of Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real Property BRIEF SUMMARY: Per NCGS 105 -369 (a) (b1), in February of each year, the tax collector must report to the governing body the total amount of unpaid taxes for the current fiscal year that are liens on real property. A county tax collector's report is due the first Monday in February. The governing body must order the tax collector to advertise the tax liens. The tax collector must send a notice to the record owner of the affected parcel at the last known address at least 30 days prior to the date of advertisement. The tax collector must publish each lien at least one time in one or more newspapers having general circulation in the taxing unit. Advertisements of tax liens shall be made during the period of March 1 through June 30. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the order for advertisement. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 8 NEW HAN OVER COUNTY TAX DEPARTMENT 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 190, Wilmington, NC 28403 P:(910)798-7300 I F:(910)798-7310 I NHCgov.com Allison Snell, Tax Administrator Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real Property As required by G.S. 105- 369(a)and(bl) Advertisement of Unpaid Tax Liens of Real Property It is hereby ordered that the Collector of Revenue provide the New Hanover County Board of commissioners a total of all unpaid real property taxes for the 2019 -2020 fiscal year. The Collector of Revenue will cause to have published once in a local newspaper all unpaid 2019 tax liens on real property during the period prescribed by law. The advertisement will combine the liens of the County of New Hanover, City of Wilmington, Town of Kure Beach, Town of Wrightsville Beach, Town of Carolina Beach and the Fire District taxes thereon this 3rd day of February, 2019. Real Property Taxes Unpaid for 2019 -2020 New Hanover $6,067,076.67 Fire District $364,983.24 Debt Service $849,182.41 Wilmington $3,005,103.44 Wilmington MSD $17,110.89 Wrightsville Beach $127,975.17 Carolina Beach $259,879.42 Kure Beach $111,033.63 *YTD TOTAL $10,802,344.87 *YTD totals are from effective date 111712020 Julia Olson- Boseman, Chair Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: County PRESENTER(S): Bill Norris, CFPUA Board Chair and Jim Flechtner, CFPUA Manager Executive Director CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Cape Fear Public Utility Authority Annual Report BRIEF SUMMARY: Bill Norris and Jim Flechtner will present the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority ( CFPUA) Annual Report RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear report. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Hear report. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Heard report. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 9 l!" 0 I 'It a a k=o 0 Ipt it all ITEM: 9 -1 -1 • j I /it 00 00, 1pg� K'Q AANI 7kk ID M qW ► 2019 saw a continued focus on CFPUA's customers, with Customer Service handling 105,189 calls. ► Constructed and rehabilitated infrastructure. zn � Cape Fear Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 2 ► Ongoing projects to enhance filtration advanced public health. ► The Authority's net financial position increased by $23.7 million. Since 2008... Customer Growth Operating Costs per Customer zn � Cape Fear Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 3 Value of water and sewer infrastructure conveyed to CFPUA by developers in 2019: $10,14951892 Annual CFPUA water and sewer bills as a percent of median household income: 1.67% Brunswick County: 1.86% ONWASA: 1.98% Fayetteville Public Works Commission: 1.82% Source: UNCSchool of Government, Environmental Finance Center r U.S. 421 Water and Sewer Expansion Construction projects valued at nearly $89 million put out to bid Lin 2019. Joint project to extend services along the U.S. 421 corridor to Pender County, completed in November. Cost: $15.5 million. Additional Raw Water Line Joint project with Brunswick County to build 14 miles of pipeline from Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority's Kings Bluff Pump Station in Bladen County to Town of Northwest. Construction began in December. New line will increase CFPUA's raw water capacity by 15 MGD. c Total project cost: $44 million � Cape Fear Cost to CFPUA: $16.1 million Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 4 .e 'M' ��V OWATITrwir- ,fp Plans were finalized in 2019 to add eight new deep -bed granular activated carbon (GAC) filters to the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant. The new filters will substantially reduce levels of PFAS in our treated water. February 2022: Filters expected to come online. Z� Total project cost: $43 million � Cape Fear Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 5 $1,407,834 $2,213,571 $5,280,566 $5,175,342 ,, Fixed Water/WastewaterCharges $29,997,568 ■ Volumetric WaterlWastewater Charges ■ System Development Charges Investment Earnings $44,274,588 Grants from other Governments ■ Other Service Charges zn Revenues: $88,349,469 � Cape Fear Public Utility Authorltyrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 6 12 $18,1 52,407 $19,619,156 w— Debt Service Operating Salaries & Benefits Capital Projects Expenditures: $83,298,631 AW I -INf d116 d116 d116 d116 These and other accomplishments result from our employees' hard work and dedication to customers. Whether repairing broken water mains in the middle of the night or helping customers get the most out of their service, the staff at CFPUA gets the credit for our achievements. zn Owl Cape Fear Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 7 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler and Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing NOTE: Applicant has Requested a Continuance Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on Behalf of the Property Owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39 Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to Construct a Residential Development Consisting of Multi- Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 52.39 acres from R -15 and R -20 to (CZD) RMF -L in order to construct a residential development consisting of multi- family, duplex, and single - family housing. The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed at a community meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units. The plan for the Board of Commissioners' consideration has been reduced to 300 units from the original 406 units proposed, including the elimination of 108 apartments. The applicant's current plan proposes 204 apartments, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family dwellings for a density of 5.7 du /ac. In addition, since the initial application, the height and unit count has been reduced for six of the proposed multi- family buildings located adjacent to existing single - family residences along the northern property line. Specifically, the buildings were reduced from 3 stories to 2 stories, and from 24 units to 16 units. The proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi- family on the western portion of the site to duplex and then single - family on the east end of the site. The proposed multi- family housing, and the majority of the units for the project, are located closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is the major commercial node of the northern portion of the County and is identified as one of three Growth Nodes in the Comprehensive Plan. According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds and an infiltration basin. The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 100 - year storm event (:t10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event ( =8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained by NCDOT. The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single - family homes and 348 multi- family units on the subject property (406 total units - which exceeds the currently proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in the PM peak hour. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10 As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family homes under the performance residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the PM peak hours. The proposed development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number of trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak. The notable roadway improvements required with the TIA include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The applicant is also proposing to add this improvement as a condition on the development. The site is classified as General Residential and Community Mixed Use in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is intended to provide alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached development, the overall project density is in -line with those characteristic of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the highest density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which is part of the Porters Neck Growth Node and designated as Community Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the orderly transition of densities and intensities. The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, numerous residents attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition presented concerns including those relating to traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. 4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi- family section of the project and the duplex housing preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing westbound travel for residents of the duplex and single - family housing in the development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction. NOTE: Two petitions have been provided by residents who oppose the application. Hard copies of the petitions have been provided to the Clerk's Office and are also viewable online at: https:Htinyurl.com /Z19- 14petitions RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval of the application. After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community representatives opposing the application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4 requiring a gate in the middle of the project because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff recommends this condition be removed due to this concern. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10 Example Motion of Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: Staff Suggested Conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Example Motion of Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with conditions 1 -3 as recommended by the Planning Board and staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Continued at the petitioner's request to April 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10 SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z19 -14) Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on behalf of the property owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to rezone approximately 52.39 acres of land located near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi - Family Low Density District, in order to construct a residential development consisting of multi - family, duplex, and single - family housing. 1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion of Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1 . The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10-1 -1 Example Motion of Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z19 -14 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z19 -14 Request: Rezoning to a Multi - Family Residential Low Density District Applicant: Property Owner(s): Logan Developers, Inc. Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al Location: Acreage: Near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the 52.39 8300 block of Shiraz Way PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: Parcel ID numbers are listed in the application package. Community Mixed Use & General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Low Density Residential, Agriculture Multi - Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -15 & R -20 (CZD) RMF -L APPLICATION BACKGROUND The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed at a community meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units. The plan being considered by the Board of Commissioners has been reduced to 300 units from the original 406 units proposed, including the elimination of 108 apartments. Because of this, technical documents (primarily the Traffic Impact Analysis) included with the application may have studied the impacts of a more intense development on the property than is currently proposed. Where possible, staff and applicant have provided updated data. Site Plan Version Proposed Units 1. Studied in TIA /First Community Meeting 406 total - 312 apts, 36 duplex, 58 SFD 2. 2 "d Community Meeting 388 total -288 apts, 34 duplex, 66 SFD 3. Initial Rezoning Application 384 total - 288 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD 4. January Planning Board Meeting 324 total -228 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD 5. Feb BOC Version 300 total - 204 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 1 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 1 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single - Family Residential (Vineyard Plantation) R -15, R -20 East Undeveloped, Porters Neck Fire Station, Davis R -20, (CUD) 0&1 Community South Single - Family Residential (Tibbys Branch) R -15 Market Street/l -140 Interchange, Lowe's Home West Improvement CUD B -2 (CUD) s. ii r� ��"� t+ d a �a 7�- ♦+ �� r� � - sy�` � �#��} Q,S��le� '1�� Aerial N. °��?- ��44 E °�� +`� ,wg4` '�`'' �"�►1� plffv L [ % X + • + ✓!#�♦ v �� *e f�4M@ ►�+R! V� y" 4F %�� r �i 1� /''° -k ++/// a '` s '•f "!.�+ ! •.'2r ' �?Q.� ti �'`'�r a° �q7� �,y� ®� k� t[P� � P`vay t °rt 9- �,. P1A�1',�i y��T �. `�+ r `� �i *y.. ,�1!!Oa �'yC' � ,:� +O'fd. �5'.�y �•°'r^�C,�Ai 43' 'it tCw �5��i��_: ION O �� F,p' �� _. �a r, -�"' *, , O �fi • *' •- a!v'7i .�,.7.��R Ysr,��'r � 5\ ✓. s' g r � e. '� � Ffi ,�� . of n _PS�� 9•arr n shy ew; ` d N '�'. �'s '' '� ;e � ki�''�,� 9�,��4}� ��•1;��Aa'�,,�F�"�y�+f4R� \5�:�� ®W��:��s Z1 9 -14 `�� . i . •. ,� ��'� +�� o�,�� tea' � � � \ .�° ,'P ��tj�`'��,'aja-�5��1 �, `�+fi�, +e'�a�� a °��h� k�?y -\ ��L" �,6,� �j�,i1H► 16�� E!: t " �' ,�� b'" =.� q, '� ,,;'a►"�i:R��g��,, � F�;� -+.. A I� Nevu Han ue Cow t '��: ZONING HISTORY July 6, 1971 The site was initially zoned R -15 and R -20 (Area 5) Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 2 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 2 COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer Water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be Historic determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Porters Neck Current: Blair Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools. Schools *See the attached New Hanover County Schools, NC Redistricting Study 2020: Options Statistics Recreation Ogden Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN "01d" Market _ Street � -- — Site Boundary �U`L i Includes Staff LShi- ra x Way APorters Neck Road Edgewater Club Road Roundabout • The applicant's proposed conceptual plan indicates the residential development will consist of 204 multi - family units, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family lots, for a total of 300 units. • In addition to the density reductions made after the community meetings, the overall density for the project has been reduced twice since it was submitted to the County due to feedback received from the Planning Board. The original application submitted to the Planning Board proposed at total of 384 units. The current plan has eliminated 84 apartment units from the original application. • The subject site is long and narrow (about 4,500 square feet long and 550 feet in width) impacting design options. • The 204 multi - family units will be located within 1 1 buildings containing 12 to 24 units each. Six buildings located adjacent existing single - family residences along the northern property line are proposed to be limited to 2 stories, while the remaining buildings along the southern property are proposed to be 3 stories. A 20 -foot opaque bufferyard is required between the multi - family buildings and the abutting single - family housing. Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 3 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 3 • Developments within the proposed RMF -L district may be constructed in accordance with the County's existing performance residential standards, which provides flexibility by allowing multiple housing types and not requiring minimum lot sizes. The flexibility of performance developments allows for additional land to be utilized for open space and stormwater purposes by clustering development on the site. • The applicant's proposed conceptual site plan indicates approximately 1 1.8 acres of the site (22 %) will be reserved for active and passive recreation space for the residents of the development. The total open space (undeveloped, stormwater, and buffer areas) is about 24 acres of the site (46 %). • The subject site does not directly access Market Street, requiring use of area collector roads. The primary access points will be to "Old" Market Street on the west side of the site and Shiraz Way on the east side of the site. • Roadway connections will also be made to three road stubs located in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision abutting the site to the north. However, the applicant is proposing a condition to gate these accessways and limit access to emergency vehicles only. • The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 100 -year storm event (�:-- 10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event (�:=8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). According the County's watershed data, the downstream outfall of the site flows south toward Pages Creek. However, if this request is approved, direction of the downstream flow will be verified during the TRC review process when more detailed engineering design is completed. • According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds and an infiltration basin. The infiltration basin is proposed on the eastern end of the site near Shiraz Way. A soils test performed by the applicant where the basin is proposed indicated an infiltration rate of over 20 inches /hr. The applicant also provided an exhibit illustrating the downstream outfall. More information is provided in the applicant's submittal documents. Existing Ditch to Proposed Existing Be Cleaned 8 Culvert POPE! with Stabilized; to Oetfall into Remain Unpiped Stream 'IT w,vl.rs 4, ^� al° rnG.s ORMIE YAREA UPI ... Ac ACm'E cE. HEIGHEORH6G�PARR oi ini Eruno AREA NEEGEB WaP —FOR ui GAa ness -- ouPGEx, rrP. swEEr 11TTOTA6 ewl.Glnas NAxl —I mPEnimE1€R SE.e.,�c Nnll.r wr za. rm.lsG. I1r Nrxl I�ET�R��LwTIEE�I � — _ FIRE I ®® ®�dI °000 ,01010{ °10;0 '3 $OIIS Tested In ._ Infiltration Basin proved I- —T° T� 1 T I1 7 –T ® ®E ° ? Infiltration Ratc ' �; is Very High: °Y JT -7–T; °''� Lin \ 1 vo Ii l_ SIG �+ L� 11' l THAN IN HD ormwater r� �/� �\ Existng Swale As Pond TR9 DErnE A r OuHflll for St _ 7 Ou(alls [o \ Infiltration Basin ormweter Ditch \ N N j /II. Pond Outfalls to 1 \ N Culvert Takes Water from Swale to Adjace ,it,, Z Z-1 nt PO &TEES p� RCr: &QAD yH , DItCn x 1 40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE., NEIGHBORHOOD t 2 fi5 AIPAG— DPEN SPACE (EXCLUDESV—LANm PROPOSED 20' 15,83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESSauTILHr Exi,75 Ditch uENr Applicant's Exhibit of the Proposed Stormwater Facilities Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 4 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 4 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Approximately 40.5 acres of the site is zoned R -15 and the remaining 11.9 acres is zoned R -20. Under the County's performance residential standards, the portion zoned R -15 would be permitted up to 102 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du /ac and the portion zoned R- 20 would be permitted up to 22 dwelling units at a density of 1.9 du /ac. The total number of units permitted under the current zoning is 124. • The proposed 300 units equates to an overall density of 5.7 du /ac, however, the majority of the units are contained within the multi - family buildings located on the western portion of the site closest to Market Street /US 17. 21.2 acres ... 62 units 2.9 du/ac `�� `•►� � t,°e` �, air �C�p'!�i �A�I'Cr3�lI�: �7rWjv _ �' I e 77 The applicant's proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi- family on the western portion of the site to duplex and then single - family on the east end of the site. This transiting development pattern is similar to the Marsh Oaks area, located to the south along Market Street, which transitions from commercial /multi- family development (Aldi, Amberleigh Shores) to townhomes, and then single - family housing. A similar example in the City of Wilmington is Fairfield Park located along Carolina Beach Road. However, in both of these examples, the more intense development has direct access to an arterial road. The proposed multi - family housing, and the majority of the units for the project, are located closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as one of three Growth Nodes in the County. Growth Nodes are intended to be focus areas of development, encouraging high- density development that promotes alternative transportation options. The intent is to cluster growth in these areas so that public transportation connections can be accomplished. The boundaries of these nodes are not site specific and are intended to be a general representation of the area. The Porters Neck community is the major commercial node of the northern portion of the County, containing big box retailers (Wal -Mart and Lowes), grocery stores (Harris Teeter and Food Lion), restaurants (Cast Iron Kitchen, Slice of Life, Buffalo Wild Wings, etc.), and medical offices (Wilmington Health, Medac). However, other than a gas station /convenience store, the existing commercial development in this node is primarily located west of Market Street or south of Porters Neck Road on the east side of Market Street. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 5 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 5 Porters Neck Node 0 ►� General Boundary of the �e Porters Neck Growth Node as shown in the Comprehensive Plan r 7. - • °- °- --^TM•x \., 0 Subject _ MEDAL EON site or � � R �qa r� Harri <_ — 'Tsetse Zoning Districts . kircue� s �. ,,fir B -1 L 1 -1 - B -2 L 0 &1 sX n, CUD B -1 R -10 > iOCUD B -2 R -15 WILMI e.. HEALNFGTON V B -✓4 ® CZD B-1 R-20 JS 60, B TRANSPORTATION • The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained by NCDOT. In addition, roadway connections will be made to existing road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision, however, the applicant is proposing to gate these connections and limit access to emergency vehicles only. • The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single - family homes and 348 multi - family units on the subject property (406 total units — which exceeds the proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in the PM peak hour. • As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family homes under the performance residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the PM peak hours. Therefore, the property could currently generate approximately 124 trips during the PM peak hours. The proposed development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number of trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak. Site Trip Distribution • The TIA estimates that distribution of traffic to and from the site will be split 5050 with half of the trips utilizing Shiraz Way and half utilizing "Old" Market Street. This distribution was proposed by the applicant and approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 6 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 6 Vehicle Trip Distribution at Notable Intersections During the Peak Hours * Number values below indicate the number of estimated vehicular trips generated by the proposed development (based on the current proposal of 300 units) in the AM and PM peak hours. Red Arrows = Trips 1. US 17 at Futch Creek Road/ "Old" SL ,, Exiting the Site �Pls'vP c� �Oo a .4 ' � P• Area Map x 58 PM Right on Porters Neck Road i 2_ Market Street At Porters Neck Road Blue Arrows = Trips Entering the Site x 7 AM 24 PM 4 b Through to U5 17 x 21 PM {/ U -Turn 8; x 24 AM Through 14 PM Through to z 11 AM� Hampstead = 36 PM Right to -' 7 AM Futch Creek 24 PM Road Left to Futch r Creek Road 61 AM 36 PM Right on US 17 7. US 17 at Futch Creek Roar! 3_ Porters Neck RoundaboutlSite Access Source: Applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (Ramey Kemp & Associates) Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 7 Page 7 of 17 Level of Service • The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable intersections in the area including the following: • Porters Neck Road at Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way (roundabout) • Market Street at Porters Neck Road • Futch Creek Road /Market Street at US 17 • US 17 at U -turn Location (north of Futch Creek Road). • Below is the LOS of the intersections described in the TIA. The data provides the overall LOS of the intersection, and was updated by the applicant's traffic engineer to reflect the conceptual plan presented at the Planning Board meeting that included 324 units. The current plan has 24 fewer units. The reduction is expected to slightly reduce the delays. • The TIA, based on the original 406 total units, also provides data on all intersection movements (left turn, right turn, through movement, etc.). There are some current and future movements with a F LOS located at the intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street. These movements generally consist of the left turns and traffic crossing Market Street. The TIA indicated the proposed development will increase the delay of one of these movements (the westbound left on Porters Neck). • The TIA did not include the impact of the improvements from the Military Cutoff extension project currently under construction. That project is expected to be completed around the proposed build out date for the requested development (late 2022/early 2023). Porters Neck Road at Edgewater Scenario 6MME Club Road/Shiraz Way Overall LOS 1 A (roundabout) Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing A 8 2023 Future A 9 2023 Future with Project Alw� L 2019 Existing A PM PEAK A 10 7 2023 Future A 8 2023 Future with Project A 9 Market Street Scenario and Porters Neck Road Overall LOS Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing D 41 2023 Future D 43 2023 Future with Project D 45 FAMMIT, M, 2019 Existing D 44 2023 Future D 47 2023 Future with Project D 48 Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 8 Page 8 of 17 US 17 at Market Scenario Street/Futch Creek Overall LOS ... Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing B 18 2023 Future B 20 2023 Future with Project C 24 2019 Existing C 33 2023 Future C 31 2023 Future with Project D 37 US 17 at U-Turn Scenario (North of Futch Creek Road) Overall LOS Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing C 22 2023 Future C 26 2023 Future with Project C ViVAN . , 31 2019 Existing A 9 2023 Future B 10 2023 Future with Project B 13 Required or Proposed Improvements • The TIA has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The notable roadway improvements required include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The application is also proposing to add this improvement as a condition on the development. Notable Roadway Improvement: r r =• Installation of a Second Right -Turn Lane to Create Dural Rights NIP • Futch Creek kf s Road market Street Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 9 of 17 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 9 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Report • The residents of Vineyard Planation recently commissioned a Traffic Calming Assessment due to speeding concerns in their neighborhood. The assessment, which was prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., examined certain roads in the neighborhood and made the following findings: Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data • The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but not limited to: • Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue; • Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery Way; and Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 17 F— Location Riesling Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 a 1ph 85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds above 35 mph 32 mph 4.4 Average Daily Traffic 1,344 Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way 25 mph 29 mph <0,1 412 Chablis Way west of ladewood Drive. 25 mph 24 mph 0.1 424 Winery Way 25 mph 29 mph 2.5 412 • The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but not limited to: • Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue; • Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery Way; and Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 17 o Using speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. • NCDOT has reviewed the assessment and provided comments. The HOA can proceed with installing the recommended speed humps on Riesling Avenue pending receiving an encroachment agreement with NCDOT. Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 11 Page 11 of 17 • STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension). • Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1-140. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project. • STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median) • Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5- foot sidewalk on the western side of the street. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • NCDOT Proiect — Installation of an Additional Southbound Exit Lane on US -17 onto Market Street o The Board of Commissioners recently adopted a resolution to support the installation of an additional southbound exit lane at the US 17 /Market Street Interchange. The project is a candidate for funding through the State's High Impact Low Cost program. o While funding for this program is currently on hold due to NCDOT' s cash flow balance, NCDOT Division 3 has been requested to submit everything needed for the fund requests to the Board of Transportation so there is no delay when funding becomes available. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status • 132,000 sf Office • 18,000 sf Medical Office • Approved August 5, 2019 1. Scotts Hill Medical • 32,000 sf Shopping • Phase 1 & 2: 2020 Build Out Park Center Year • 9,000 sf Pharmacy with • Full Build 2022 Drive - Through The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a northbound U -turn lane on US 17 south of Scott Hill Loop Road. • Installation of a southbound left turn lane on US 17 at Scoots Hill Medical Drive. • Installation of a northbound right turn lane, removal of the barrier from the southbound left turn lane, and signalization of the intersection on US 17 at the site's southern access point. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 12 Page 12 of 17 • Scotts Hill Village • Coastal Prep Academy Development Status: Phase 1 of the medical park has been platted consisting of 3 lots. Currently, one office building is being constructed. No roadway improvements have been completed at this time. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Waterstone • 151 Single - Family • Approved June 18, 2015 Dwellings • 2020 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a southbound right turn lane on Edgewater Club Road at the site's northern access. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Porters Neck Elementary Development Status: 98 lots have been platted at this time. The right turn lane has been installed. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class II (moderate limitation) and Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 13 Page 13 of 17 Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 14 Page 14 of 17 General Residential & Community Mixed Use located partially within Porters Neck Growth Node. The subject parcel is primarily General Residential, with roughly 20% Future Land Use designated as Community Mixed Use. Map Place Type Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed with either place type, allowing site - specific features and evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered. General Residential: Focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family Place Type residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. Description Community Mixed Use: Focus on small - scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi - family and single - family residential. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 14 Page 14 of 17 Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 15 Page 15 of 17 The proposed RMF -L development is located between existing lower density residential neighborhoods and the Old Market St. corridor at the edge of the Porters Neck Growth Node. This growth node is one of the areas identified as where growth should be clustered and high- density developments encouraged. In general, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along roadways for higher residential densities and a mix of uses and those near existing neighborhoods as General Residential in order to allow for an orderly transition of densities and intensities. The proposed RMF -L zoning, one of the new zoning tools adopted in July 2019 to provide for the development patterns outlined in the Analysis Comprehensive Plan, would provide a transition in density and intensity between future Community Mixed Use development along Old Market Street and the existing single family residential districts on either side of the subject site. Providing options for alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached development is one of the stated intents for this district. The overall project density of 5.7 units per acre is generally consistent with the 6 dwelling units per acre characteristic of the General Residential place type. The majority of that density is proposed for the western portion of the site closest to the growth node and Community Mixed Use areas which promotes densities up to 15 dwelling units per acre. The density of the duplex and single - family detached portion of the project prosed for the eastern side is closer to 3 dwelling units per acre. The proposed RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is intended to provide alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached Consistency development, the overall project density is in -line with those characteristic Recommendation of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the highest density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which is part of the Porters Neck Growth Node and designated as Community Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the orderly transition of densities and intensities. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 15 Page 15 of 17 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, numerous residents attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition presented concerns including those relating to traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. 4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi - family section of the project and the duplex housing preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing westbound travel for residents of the duplex and single - family housing in the development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Overall the project is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan because it contributes to providing a mix of housing options in the area, provides for the orderly transition of uses, and the overall project density is in -line with those recommended in the General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types. As the unique location of the site does not have direct access to an arterial street, it is anticipated the development will increase traffic near established single - family neighborhoods. However, the review of the TIA, which studied the impact from 406 dwelling units (exceeding the 300 units proposed) indicates that the overall Level of Service of the major intersections in the area will operate at an acceptable level when the proposed development is expected to be completed in 2023. The applicant is also proposing to design the stormwater facilities to accommodate the 100 -year storm event, which exceeds the County's requirement of designing to the 25 -year storm event. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 17 Staff recommends approval of the application. After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community representatives opposing the application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4 requiring a gate in the middle of the project because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff recommends this condition be removed due to this concern. Example Motion of Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Example Motion of Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 17 Page 17 of 17 NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS Elementary School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics Cr )ppen�l5 Elementary School 2021 -22 Capacity Total Enrolled DRAFT Option 3d Estimated Enrollment Alderman 270 277 298 Anderson 543 671 638 Bellamy 400 614 473 CRECC 93 126 92 Blair 549 587 510 Bradley Creek 344 417 336 Carolina Beach 370 461 437 Castle Hayne 524 539 499 College Park 488 450 574 Forest Hills 431 368 496 Freeman 358 260 276 Holly Tree 413 511 489 Murrayville 558 666 520 Ogden 534 695 582 Parsley 423 681 554 Pine Valley 416 602 517 Porter's Neck 503 518 Snipes 528 417 405 Sunset Park 435 357 500 Williams 353 449 466 Winter Park 286 310 278 Wrightsboro 499 560 569 Wrightsville Beach 265 314 305 Total 9583 10332 10332 *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. A NH(S 2 Revised: 11/01/2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS Elementary School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics (Continued) Cr )ppen�l5 Elementary School 2021 -22 Capacity Enrolled Utilization DRAFT Option 3d Utilization Alderman 270 103% 110% Anderson 543 124% 117% Bellamy 400 154% 118% CRECC 93 135% 99% Blair 549 107% 93% Bradley Creek 344 121% 98% Carolina Beach 370 125% 118% Castle Hayne 524 103% 95% College Park 488 92% 118% Forest Hills 431 85% 115% Freeman 358 73% 77% Holly Tree 413 124% 118% Murrayville 558 119% 93% Ogden 534 130% 109% Parsley 423 161% 131% Pine Valley 416 145% 124% Porter's Neck 503 103% Snipes 528 79% 77% Sunset Park 435 82% 115% Williams 353 127% 132% Winter Park 286 108% 97% Wrightsboro 499 112% 114% Wrightsville Beach 265 118% 115% 9583 108% 108% *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. A NH(S 3 Revised: 11/01/2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS Middle School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics Cr )ppen�l5 Middle School 2021 -22 Capacity Total Enrolled DRAFT Option 3d Estimated Enrollment Holly Shelter 918 697 869 Murray 768 1088 909 Myrtle Grove 706 725 858 Noble 592 918 703 Roland -Grise 690 895 911 Trask 622 760 723 Williston 736 657 767 Total 0 5032 5740 5740 *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. Middle School 2021 -22 Capacity Enrolled Utilization DRAFT Option 3d Utilization Holly Shelter 918 1 76% 95% Murray 768 142% 118% Myrtle Grove 706 103% 122% Noble 592 155% 119% Roland -Grise 690 130% 132% Trask 622 122% 116% Williston 736 89% 104% Total 5032 114% 114% *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. A NHCS 9 Revised: 11/01/2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS Hieh School Estimated Enrollment Statistics High School Grade Config 2021 -22 Capacity Total Enrolled Enrolled Utilization Ashley 9-12 1756 1838 105% Hoggard 9-12 1742 1809 104% Laney 9-12 1853 2093 113% New Hanover 1 9-12 1668 1 1379 1 83% Total Mi 5.1% 1 7019 1 7119 1 101.4% *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. High School Demographics Statistics *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. Cr )ppen�l5 A NHCS 13 Revised: 11/01/2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Enrolled High School Percent Black Percent White Percent Hispanic Percent Other Ashley 9.4% 73.7% 10.2% 6.8% Hoggard 10.4% 74.7% 9.2% 5.7% Laney 19.4% 60.1% 13.8% 6.7% New Hanover 32.4% 46.1% 16.4% 5.1% Total 17.1% 64.60/, 12.2% 6.2% *Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student database. *Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes. Cr )ppen�l5 A NHCS 13 Revised: 11/01/2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N 11 G 6) 1 � R -7` � kN 1 -14fl 0 t_14Q ,�ys ski ` Q 8422 1021 81205 1V <) q� •B;Z 191 •8414 213 ��O �c� B -1 • 8390 16 2 `Z / -a �Q OQ` •h� • Site 83x0 8839 8410 2 3� 088437 �� 836± 8370 \ '`408 412 - �8350 N 8408 8406/ 195 `8405401 84 /1' 4'4 O&I 0 8311 83421 8409 409 417 434 �O 'Q I -1 8312 8320 • 418 8417 w R -15 • 8376 4`14 425 429 8418 <201 • `43o�tTc8410 205 �20 207 \6 454\ Subject Site •� 2176213 301 8402 8406 (6 2 y�4P CF((4R- 400 22 604 / 217 �• 404 i6 0 606• (� 1305 0 • 412,. 14 1<V1 « 612 �'� Cy C / J` O 221 (� 421 w 1 116; 1,000 3/17 • �! 416 • 618/ 25 629 •f��\ TG E/( �/ • � • 408 • ',R� +� %626a/ 702/620. q RU 313 32.1 420 - 622,Z(633 0 �424/•�V99\ �.l 641 �7� 0 '1'\N 401 428 500\ % 8356 `6 � /637 � 718 • 634 -1IV 705 -_722 417/ 504 /501\ X642 �645�701726 i ' 5 X702 �' *717*>\-730 42 A[� 50 ��515 713 0717 acs Ay Vq a �`50�• 508 4,516,1519 � 7067 �•�7.18� 25 • 73 aP Cy9� X524 `601'605 , 4�\7 114/8 41.1 • 8 10 513* 517 ,� �i 13 722 726► 8403 w / 521 06014 �a609�615 730 •!> 8406 4�11aG 1 fOfVIE RD _ �l f • 608 �• 6112 8402 X605 • / �' ,� 71157• 738• \n /2$��b X011 705 • 801. • 746 I 617 • 8313 985 Q F 609 701 • • • 714 < <F 04' O 713 [ 4. 725 1009 • 1009 0 4'!p Otr 0 , 719 0010 099 08310 aRF6, 722 805 $1,7 1007 1013 1013 Ali 71! 802 • i 804 102 97 / • 101013 Q 8257 8253 8269 �s 101 8241 • 18281'8277 Al2 602 05 8249' q� q�p. Q 8229 0624* 71 q0 �822J !8232 640)0 1624 �12� Z \ 82130644r636 632 � ��` ,��hA1N/(C/ PORtERS•NFCk 0. 0- 8217.652 10,9 113 ct`�y, 1P OQp R � Qom' 104 '1 d5�941 117 Feet Parcels withir$S ners - 1 202 M: 10- 4 fi r C m S Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N �� 1 W Ills ♦�1DJNG �!p NY MAP ww�w�w• iii ♦i'! !i!!�i ♦i ♦mow+► R �°4� -�� Q �p�` p. w�w� CUDtB�r2'yw�w�♦ �s yNAY �r9 � 1 �`N� �1"Ov w,►5w 96 i ♦w�ww ty hj� www ♦iPwwiwiwiwiwiw � Q- '�o. `' wwi1�i� ♦�wwi ♦ ♦��ww �� p �� o ♦ ��' , `� �QU .Q WILD DUNES;CIK CZri. B -2 : u° Subject Site 1 -1 s: 1 Imo, 1,000 /'TIC C `��- �''��R ,�F�y ? ao 2Q —Water CUD O &I ✓F Sewer v ,4a� 4Q'V Zoning Districts Lu 111-15 A -1 EDZD PD R -20S SC Q� F, AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7 4. B -1 1 -2 R -15 RA B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance r o loners - a 3, 20 Feet Incorporated Areas � � SHOD t_ t r _ M: 10- 5 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N ,A M IXE 1,000 /COMMUNITY MIXED USE Feet i r m Subject Site GENERAL/ RESIDENTIAL W r.1.1 349, CONSERVATION IL NG,,yo Place Types COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE �A k COMMUNITY MIXED USE CSR RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 1 AN HAN V R COD U NT Y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (910) 798 -7053 plan ningdevelopment.nhcg ov.com Appiication � L j Applicant /Agenti• Informc Lion Property Owner(s) If different than Applicant /Agent Name Owner Name Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached Company Owner Name 2 Logan Developers, Inc. Address Address 60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1 City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Belville, NC 28451 Phone Phone 910.452.7175 Email Email asmith @loganhomes.com Subject Property information Address /Location See Attached Parcel Identification Number(s) See Attached Total Parcel(s) Acrecge 52.39 ac Existing Zoning and Use(s) See Attached Future Land Use Classification Community Mixed Use and General Residential Application Only) Case Number Date/Time received: Received by: Z ' l q Page 3 of 7 Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 1 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District. RMF -L Total Acreage of Proposed District. ±5239 ac Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). See Attached Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 4 of 7 ITEM: 10- Cepn¢+tional Zoning District Application — Updated 52017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip GenerationManuoi. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. iTE Land Use: See Report Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): _ AM Peak Flour Trips: _ _ PM Peak Hour Trips: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistentwith the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, c an create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) See Attached -- - — -- 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 5 of 7 ITEM: 10 -C8— itional Zoning District Application –Updated 5/20T7 APPLICATIO N REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial'. If an item is not applicable, mark as "NIA ". Applications must be complete in order to process for further review. Required Information Applicant Staff Initial Initial 1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application. a 5 2 Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review). �5 3 Community meeting written summary. 4 Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). �5 5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page reference of the property requested for rezoning. 6 Site Plan including the following elements: * Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non- residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. Development schedule including proposed phasing. Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets �7 and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. I� All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. ® The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance. Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change Ref. Article VII as applicable). 7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan. t�s 8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. g Page 6 of 7 Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 4 By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. i understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Acton my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. Signature of Property Owner(s) �//( 4, Signatur o Appli a gent Print Name(s) A40126�/ Print Name NOTE, Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. �'oNTY:'� •f. , \," p n Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 7 of 7 ITEM: 1 0 -Qm itional Zoning District Application —Updated 5/2017 0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING & LAND USE o Wi a AUTHORITY FOR Fri ®usartni" APPOINTMENT OF AGENT Print Farm 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 2843 910 -798 -7165 phone 910 -798 -7053 fax www.nhegov.com Please note that for quasi - judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property Name Owner Name Address Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached Subject Property Owners See Attached Company Owner Name 2 City, State, Zip Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached See Attached Address Address Parcel ID 60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1 See Attached See Attached City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Belville, NC 28451 See Attached Phone Phone 910.452.7175 See Attached Email Email asmith@loganhomes.com ApplicationTracking Information See Attached (Staff 0111v) Case Number Reference: Uate/Time received: Received bv: 10 This document was willfully executed on the day of October �0 19 Owner 1 Signature Owner 2 Signature 09114 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E R I M G, I N C. Porters Oaks Conditional Rezoning Application Subject Property Owners PIN: R02900- 004 - 007 -000 Book / Page: 1611/1259 Property Address: 8390 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.22 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley as the heirs of Robert C Jr & Emma Murray Phone: DocuSigned by: F Phone: Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS.. Robe zt%&jrr(y96blJrt... Email: DocuSigned by: A4 Ulrike . rz yF6avuse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: Sandra lsd§64az... PIN: R02900- 004 - 008 -000 Book / Page: 9906/1103 Property Address: 8370 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.92 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Ben G. Murray Jr., married as the sole heir of Ben G Murray Phone: DocuSigned by: Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS.. by: Email: FDocuSig"ed Joyce A. ra4b&aQUf�eA @.f. Ben G. Murray, Jr. PIN: R02900- 004 - 019 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8370 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.29 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 7 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PIN: DocuSigned by: Phone: 5558/0221 Property Address: Ro 111 Email: DocuSigned by: Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley UI #�YWAWPfFspouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by- Phone: DocuSigned by: — San 3.K.Osrrz y PIN: R02900- 004 - 009 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8376 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 14.30 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 101 - Agricultural Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley DocuSigned by: F Phone: Ro 2L"PfMMTW,1llll Email: DocuSigned by: Ulr KDIVIE4FtKtpouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: /I ' Al/A. v^ Pra j( -(-14 Sa 3kLDFSPta&.y PIN: R03700- 001 - 007 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8380 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 11.69 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley DocuSigned by- Phone: Rob .1Wruga,2flll Email: DocuSigned by: Ulrik oMw`d'Dam-fi (rouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: Sand 3-6- "lie8WA82... PIN: R03700- 001 - 006 -000 Book / Page: 1592/1390 Property Address: 8313 Shiraz Way, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 1.07 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 8 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 Property Owner: Robert C Murray III and wife Ulrike H. Murray DocuSigned by: Phone: Email: DocuSigned by: U I kdo *Auga yF... PIN: R02900- 004 - 010 -000 Book / Page: 9905/1807 Property Address: 421 Tibby's Drive, Wilmington INC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 12.86 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and Antonia M Foy Life Estate 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 9 DocuSigned by: Phone: tilt ISS A�foad6��s Email: DocuSigned by: E;6tvu wusS iw @AsV.. DocuSigned by: SOgW,& i�uSS 9409 fo6y by Sognia F. Weiss her Attorney in Fact PIN: R02900- 004 - 010 -001 Book / Page: 9905/1807 Property Address: 8362 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.73 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and Antonia M Foy Life Estate Phone: DocuSigned by: &41- (bliss Email: i�lf9dtsld�ES$ DocuSigned by: E;hMt'V' UA-SS (w wN�V... DocuSigned/ by: s�c�Bs6�sy. by Sognia F. Weiss her Attorney in Fact 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 9 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PIN: R03700- 001 - 003 -000 Book / Page: 5801/1623 Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 3.32 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company DocuSigned by: Phone: FiL F7o d err-.•L Jr. B "(Prwd8 Tuurray, Jr., Member and General Manager Email: PIN: R03700- 001 - 002 -000 Book / Page: 5801/1623 Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 6.97 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company DocuSigned by: Phone: JL Flo d urr.,• Jr. By mfdoQfdchLarray, Jr., Member and General Manager Email: 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 10 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upol ti id: N 1 =T--i - -r 18, 2019 Date: October 10, 2019 Project Narrative - The Oaks at Murray Farm: The proposed development is located between Old Market Street, Shiraz Way, and Tibby's Drive and is comprised of the following parcels totaling +52.39 acres: R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 The zoning of the parcels is R -15 in the middle to northwest portion of the tract, the portion fronting Old Market Street. The rear of the property is zoned R -20. The NHC Future Land Use Plan identifies the front third of the site as community mixed use and the rear as general residential. This area east /southeast of Market Street is identified as a growth node with an emphasis on commercial and dense residential uses. The rear of the site is slated as general residential and transitions from the growth node into the neighborhood fabric of the Porters Neck area. In keeping with the split land uses, we present a project with apartments near Market Street in the growth node and transition into the duplexes and single family more aligned with general residential. To create this cohesively designed mixture of product types on the subject parcels, we respectfully request the property be conditionally rezoned to the RMF -L Residential Multi- family Low Density). This proposed zoning district is one of the new districts recently approved to offer better, more site specific development options. This RMF -L zone allows us to provide a mixture of product types integrated into common open space, landscape, and other improvements that make a project feel like it is blended and well thought -out. Part of the charm of this property is the large trees as seen from Market Street. Our plan proposes saving as many of those large trees as possible to set the most dense portion of our plan, the apartments, into a tree canopy. This unique setting allows us to preserve the character of the site and neighborhood while transitioning down to a traditional single - family neighborhood. The majority of the land is or has been used as farm land and provides a good, open area in the rear of the property as is required for the single family homesites proposed. The applicant, Logan Developers, Inc. presents this project request to you as one that is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Future Land Use plan and as a project, that we feel, honors the natural site characteristics while acting as a transition project to the surrounding townhomes, duplexes, and single family homes in the vicinity of this project. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 11 Page 2 of 2 During the process, the development team has listened to concerns and comments form residents within the Porters Neck community. We have made many changes, best summarized in the community meeting summary, and attempted to compromise with the neighbors to alleviate traffic and stormwater concerns and limit density beyond the initial plans. We recognize this is a project that infills one of the last undeveloped properties in the Porters Neck area, and we also understand the comments from neighbors to keep the current community as it is now. However, our development team strongly feels this is a project worthy of fitting into the Porters Neck community. We present this project for the consideration of planning staff and New Hanover County Boards to determine if this project is a suitable conditional rezoning for an area of the County noted as community mixed use /general residential and as a growth node as indicated by the County's adopted Future Land Use Plan, as a project cohesively designed as a transition from higher density, commercial corridor of Market Street back to the traditional single family neighborhoods of Porters Neck. Thank you for your consideration of the conditional rezoning request. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 12 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upol ID: D ❑m❑ ❑ ❑r 13, 2019 Upol tl I: N❑ELI❑ ❑ ❑r 18, 2019 Date: October 10, 2019 Updated Submittal 12/13/19: The updated submittal reduces overall density on the site from the original 406 units down to 324 (228 apartments, 34 duplex, 62 single family). This reduces the proposed density from 7.75 units /acre to 6.18 units /acre. We discussed options for plan alterations with those willing to discuss changes to the plan. A certain portion of the community was willing entertain a proposal that pulled apartments further away from the Vineyard Plantation homes and removed the third floor of the apartments. The newly revised plan does just that —takes 6 of the 12 apartment buildings down to 2 stories and leaves 3 story buildings only in the areas adjacent to vacant land. We received one request to move the pool and clubhouse away from nearby homes, so we also accommodated this by pulling it into open space areas more internally located than on the edge near existing homes. We also reduced the overall apartment count from the most recent proposal of 288 to the current proposal of 228 units (a drop of 60units). We also added both dedicated open space and undeveloped or landscape areas. The applicant's previously proposed conditions remain current in this proposal. We recognize that we cannot make every neighbor happy with this proposal, but we are presenting this plan in a good -faith effort to respond to and compromise with the community. We respectfully submit this plan to you for consideration of the conditional rezoning as presented in the plans and associated documents. Previously Submitted Information: The Oaks at Murrav Farm Conditional Zoning Suaalemental Information Proposed Conditions: Beyond the existing requirements of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance, the proposed for the initial 10/10/19 submittal mixed residential project proposes to save many of the large character trees in an effort to both preserve the site's character and to help buffer the larger apartment buildings on site. In addition, the applicant proposing pulling most buildings away from property lines to further buffer the proposed development from the neighboring properties. The updated conditions proposed for the conditional rezoning are as follows and as a direct result of community meeting concerns: 1. Revise stormwater design to achieve 100 year storm instead of meeting the minimum 25 year storm. This is achievable in part because of the excellent soils data obtained since the first community meeting and in part because the wetland area of the site was not nearly as much land area once an on -site analysis was completed. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 13 Page 2 of 3 2. To alleviate traffic concerns, the applicant proposes to design and construct an additional right turn lane at Futch Creek Road. and Hwy 17 /Market intersection if NCDOT /WMPO allow this measure to be completed. After our traffic consultant ran various scenarios at all intersection near the project site, the improvement that made the most impact was this intersection. The current understanding is that the Futch Creek traffic light queuing will be cut nearly in half by addition of a right turn lane. The design will have to be coordinated with the two entities to assure initial design meets their future plans and does not conflict with their understanding of the movement through the intersection. As such, the applicant proposes to pursue this right turn lane improvement with all the necessary decision makers including the County, WMPO, and NCDOT. Consideration of a Conditional Zoning District - Criteria: 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? The subject property is located in a growth node just off of Market Street, in an area slated for intensive development such as shopping centers and commercial services. The design of the project proposes placing the most intensive use, the apartments, near the front of the site and in the growth node area. This type of use will be most intense, but the design also promotes another policy to conserve natural resources, such as the large trees designated to be saved at the front of the site. The single family and duplex portions of the design are in keeping with the existing fabric of the neighborhood and align with the Future Land Use Plan. 2. How would the requested conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? As mentioned above, the requested zoning and layout of the design nicely aligns with the Future Land Use Map. The apartments end nearly right on top of the division of Community Mixed Use, an acceptable use for this designation, and the single family and duplexes fall within the general residential designated portion of the site. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? The existing zoning reflects a less intensive land use than Future Land Use Plan projects for this commercial corridor along Market Street. The proposed single family and duplex areas are allowable under the existing zonings as performance residential; however the rezoning to RMF -L allows apartments and more intensive mixed use residential projects to be constructed whereas the current zoning does not. This project does propose higher than the 2.5 units / acre allowed by the by -right performance residential. Our proposed 7.4 units to the acre places the bulk of that density in the apartments, the area of the site slated for community mixed -use. While the proposed zoning district allows for 10 units to the acre, it is really the combination of higher density and mixture of uses that allows the project to be Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 14 Page 3 of 3 built in keeping with the County's plans for this region of the County. RMF -L allows the project to blend a mixture of residential housing types that specifically fit the Future Land Use Plan in this area of the County. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 15 JC MORGAN REAL ESIAIE VALUXI ION I REVIEW I CONSULTING:; December 1, 2019 New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive - Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Rezoning; Conditional Zoning District Case Number Z19 -14 Logan Developers, Inc. 52.39 Acres; The Oaks at Murray Farm (Proposed) New Hanover County, NC JC Morgan Company is a real estate appraisal and consulting firm in Wilmington, NC. Since 2010, our firm has appraised and consulted on hundreds of properties in and around the Wilmington area. The property types we appraise and provide consulting services for include residential, land, retail, office, industrial, subdivisions and mixed -use. Our client base consists of real estate owners, developers, financial institutions, local and federal governments and related agencies, attorneys, utility companies and airport authorities. I was recently engaged by the applicant to perform research and analysis that would enable me to conclude an opinion of whether the proposed project would have any impact on the adjacent and surrounding properties. As I understand it, The Oaks at Murray Farm is a proposed residential development to be located on 52.39 acres in the Porters Neck area of New Hanover County. The development will contain single family residences on the east end of the project, duplex style residential properties located in the middle section of the development and luxury garden style residential apartments on the west side of the project. The development appears to meet or exceed market standards for overall design, buffers, aesthetics and product pricing. As the immediate area already consists of small lot SFR residential development, duplex -style residential development and traditional SFR residential development, the project's proposed single family development (east side of the project) and the duplex style residential dwellings (middle section of the project) are considered to be consistent with existing land uses in the immediate area and will have no negative impact on adjacent or surrounding property values. In fact, the market prices of the proposed single family and duplex style residential dwellings will likely be higher than many of the surrounding property values, potentially increasing the average market value of homes in the area. This trend of new home product pricing extending beyond the values of the existing housing stock in the immediate area remains consistent throughout New Hanover and surrounding counties. Lumina Station 1904 Easm,00d Road - Suite 305 - Wilmington, NC • 28403 PO Box 481 • lVrightss -ille Beach. NC • 6;,480 Tel: 910 - 256 -2920 • Fax: 888 - 819 -8258 www.jcmorganco.com Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 16 The west side of the proposed project will consist of a luxury garden style residential apartment complex. As with most newly developed apartment communities in their respective markets, the proposed apartments should command some of the highest rents in the sub - market, attracting tenants with higher income levels and those who 'lease by choice'. To develop an opinion as to whether the proposed apartments would have any Impact on adjacentor surrounding property values, I have taken the following steps: 1. I performed a review of several apartment communities in the Wilmington market, and more particularly in the property's immediate sub - market, to determine the impact, if any, these apartment communities had on adjacent and surrounding property values, Some of the communities I reviewed included: • Amberleigh Shores • Hawthorne at the Station /Lucia Point • Headwaters at Autumn Hall • Tesla Park • St. Andrews Place, Reserve • Bellingham Park (Condominiums) Whenever the data allowed, I compared SFR properties that abutted the apartment communities to SFR properties that did not, to determine if there was any quantifiable impact on property values. In several cases, over 10 years of data was reviewed. During my research, I found no indication that the properties abutting the adjacent apartment communities had any impact (positive of negative) on value. 2. Discussions with market participants is a common method to get a feel of how the market perceives various issues. For this assignment, I spoke with several market participants about the impact the proposed development could have on the adjoining or surrounding properties. I spoke with several market participants active in the local real estate market (residential real estate brokers and appraisers). All indicated that the proposed project would likely have no impact on the real estate values of adjoining or surrounding properties. In fact, several indicated that a SFR dwelling that backs up to an adequate buffer of a luxury apartment community would be preferable to one backing up to another SFR dwelling. Summary Based on my research and review of market sales data, I found no evidence that the proposed project would have any negative impact on the property values of the adjacent or surrounding properties Furthermore, due to the growth of the immediate area over the past several years, which includes apartment communities, hotels, new retail centers, restaurants and increasing residential densities, the property is considered an infill site. Within the market area, comparable infill sites have been developed with mixed uses, generally consisting of commercial or multi - family land uses located at the front of the development and single - family land uses located at the rear of the developments. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 17 This transition of land uses is preferred by New Hanover County, as noted in the NHC Future Land Use Plan, as well as other municipalities in North Carolina. The proposed project is consistent with the recommended uses of the Community .'Aired Use place type and is consistent with current and preferred development trends for comparable locations. Should you have any questions, or want to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, = 1� == Jack C. (Cal) Morgan, III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS JC Morgan Company Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 18 PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. October 11, 2019 19305.PE Various Parcels in Porters Neck New Hanover County, North Carolin 60 Gregory Rd., Suite 1 Belville, NC 28451 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being various tracts or parcels of land in Harnett Township, New Hanover County, North Carolina, being located on the southeastern side of Market street and U.S. Highway 17 consisting of New Hanover County tax records parcels R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 -007- 000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 -003 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, and R02900- 004 - 019 -000 being more particularly described as follows. Point of beginning being the northern most corner of R02900- 004 - 007 -000, 8390 Market street on the southern margin of Market street thence South 49 °15'00" East a distance of 160.00' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street South 48 °52'51" East a distance of 112.94' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 009 -000 8376 Market street the following five (5) course and distances; South 48 °34'30" East a distance of 645.43' to a point; South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 551.15' to a point; South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 505.00' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 453.92' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 100.00' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R03700- 001 - 007 -000 8380 Market street the following six (6) course and distances; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 612.12' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 192.62' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 434.02' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 272.19' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 264.19' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 118.03' to a point; 1 22 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T O N , NO 2 B 4❑ 3 F H: (9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 6 7 p 7 F A l 9 7 9 1 . 6 7 6 BoarJoFCommissioners - February A, 1b� ITEM: 10- 8 - 19 Thence with the northern and eastern R03700- 001 - 006 -000 8313 Shiraz way the following two (2) course and distances; Thence South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 174.97' to a point; Thence South 40 °29'15" West a distance of 266.25' to a point; Thence with the eastern and southern of R03700- 001 - 002 -000 817 Porters Neck road the following six (6) course and distances; South 33 °53'14" West North 77 °36'20" West North 12 °32'57" East North 44 °45'48" West South 84 °04'42" West North 48 °00'48" West a distance of 226.29' to a point; a distance of 195.59' to a point; a distance of 156.21' to a point; a distance of 635.91' to an STONE "N'; a distance of 207.34' to a point; a distance of 430.32' to a point; Thence with the southern boundary of R03700- 001 - 003 -000 817 Porters Neck road North 48 °00'48" West a distance of 500.57' to a point; Thence around R03700- 001 - 003 - 001499 Tibbys drive the following three (3) course and distances; North 41 °27'48" East a distance of 285.38' to a point; North 48 °29'24" West a distance of 500.56' to a point; South 41 °00'57" West a distance of 279.00' to a point; Thence with the southern boundary of R02900- 004 -010 -000 421 Tibbys drive the following four (4) course and distances to the southern margin of said Market street; North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 935.83' to a point; North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 999.80' to a point; Thence North 42 °02'57" East a distance of 75.35' to a point; Thence North 48 702'55" West a distance of 252.66' to a point; Thence with the southeastern Market street right of way by old deeds with R02900- 004 - 010 -000 421 Tibby drive, R02900- 004 - 010 - 0018362 Market street, R02900- 004 - 019 -000 8370 Market street, R02900- 004- 009 -000 8376 Market street, R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street, and R02900- 004 - 007 -000 8390 Market street the following three (3) course and distances; North 42 °45'04" East a distance of 109.15' to a point; North 42 °13'46" East a distance of 288.18' to a point; North 42 °10'00" East a distance of 60.00' to a point which is the point of beginning. Having an area of 2,287,089 Sq. Ft. or 52.5 Acres more or less as computed by deeds. EXCEPTING from such a 6x10 plot around the "Lewis Buxton" grave site and lands claimed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation. 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M 1 N G T O N, N C 2 8 4 0 3 P H: (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A (9 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 11 Board of Commissioners - 4ebruar`y �O�O ITEM: 10- 8 - 20 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upd ❑t Ed: N -EZE I -_:_- 12, 2019 Date: September 30, 2019 The Oaks at Murray Farm Community Meetings Summary The Oaks at Murray Farm has conducted multiple meetings with the Porters Neck community. A brief summary is listed below with detail summary provided at the end. Community Meeting #1 was held on September 30, 2019 with a 400 -450 person attendance. Because of the large group and the concern over the project, the development team listened to comments and asked for community representatives to continue to meet with us to refine the plans. Some of the residents agreed to one meeting held on November 8th, 2019 and included many community HOA presidents and representatives meeting to discuss the plan revised to address many of their concerns including adding buffers, open space, saving a large, significant trees, especially in the apartment portion of the plan to further screen apartments and work the plan into the existing site, reducing the number of apartments (eliminated 2 buildings), pulling the apartment buildings further away from neighboring properties, adding emergency services access -only gates to the Vineyard Plantation road connections to reduce traffic concerns in their neighborhood, agreeing to provide stormwater well in excess of the County's 25 year storm (to provide for the 100 year storm), and to agree to build a turn lane (that is not otherwise a required by the TIA) from Futch Creek to Hwy 17 to alleviate traffic concerns in the area. At the end of this HOA representative meeting, the representatives refused to meet with the development team again stating that we were not addressing their concerns and we would have to agree to disagree. They refused to accept any plans with apartments on the plan. Community Meeting #2 was held on November 12th, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex Auditorium. Given the large number of folks attending the first meeting, we searched for a venue that would agree to allow us to host a meeting with 500 people. After three weeks of searching for a venue that was relatively close to the project site, had free parking for the community, could house the amount of residents interested in the project, and would agree to host a development project meeting, we found the Hampstead Annex Auditorium. It was only capable of housing approximately 250 people at one time, so we divided the meeting into two groups. Those living to the north were asked to attend the first meeting. Those living to the south /east of the project site were asked to attend the second meeting. The majority of questions received at these two meetings were about traffic and concerns over apartments near their homes. Some folks were also concerned about school overcrowding. Full details for the two community meetings are provided below. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 21 Page 2 of 5 To date, we continue to talk with residents both for and against the project. The development team continues to address as many concerns as is possible to demonstrate that they do want to be good neighbors, but that the developer is proposing a project that does include apartments. The Oaks at Murray Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 1 Notes: Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held a community meeting at Anchor Baptist Church on Futch Creek Rd. from 6:00 -7:00 PM on September 30, 2019. Approximately 400 -450 residents attended the meeting to listen to a presentation of the project and offer comments on the developer's proposal. - Check on school capacity at Porters Neck School (Answer: We will reach out to the NHC Schools folks to discuss) - Because of drought conditions and restriction on irrigation needs, does this cause future water supply issues (Answer: We have not evaluated irrigation at this time, but if water capacity is available, CFPUA will advise throughout the project's development.) - Would like gates on side roads (Answer: We will investigate with our traffic consultant) Will the existing ditches be left open for stormwater flow (Answer: Existing streams will be left open in all plans to date, on -going analysis of stormwater will help us further develop the entire plan) - Price point of units (Answer: Luxury Apartments is target market, prices will vary based on market conditions, but anticipated at $1100 +/ mo) - Will apartments be Section 8 apartments (Answer: no) - People expressed approval of the duplex /single family portion of the development, especially if Logan is the developer, but they are unhappy with the apartments proposed largely due to traffic concerns. (Answer: we are looking at the detailed traffic analysis for the whole project, but we hear the concerns about apartments. We will evaluation the plan and make changes if the developer chooses to do so) - Several people told us to put apartments on the other side of Market Street — it was better land for that. (It is understood that many residents have expressed interest in not having apartments near their homes, however, the future land use plan does identify the area as a growth node for shopping center and denser development. The apartments are clustered in that higher density portion of the site as identified in the FLUP) - Will buffer /vegetation be kept for the existing properties (Yes, to the greatest extent possible and augmented as needed) - Traffic concerns along /at round about on Porters Neck Road (Answer: We will look at both Porters Neck Road and Futch Creek Rd. for any improvements that may alleviate concerns. After the meeting, the traffic consultant conducted a series of studies looking at the roundabout on Porters Neck Road, the Intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street and at Futch Creek Rd /Market(HWY 17) intersection. Due to current NCDOT bypass projects and the associated anticipated effects on Porters Neck/ Market intersection and due to constricted land area and the fact that Porters Neck Road is reported to operate at a Level of Service A (the best rating) even after the proposed project is built, Futch Creek Road was the only improvement that could alleviate traffic in any significant way. This is explained in Meeting #2 summary. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 22 Page 3 of 5 - Status of Traffic Study (Answer: submitted, not approved time of Meeting #1) - Phasing of project (Answer: Anticipated build out in 2023 used in traffic report, phasing not determined at this time) - Making sure apartments are for rent (Answer: yes) - The neighbors expressed concern about the amount of traffic this project could cause (Answer: see detailed explanation above) - When the group broke into smaller groups looking at the plans, many people were appreciative of the information, but wanted to talk further with Logan to better understand the product proposed and the overall ramifications to their neighborhoods. (Many folks talked with the development team through phone and email after the meeting) POST MEETING #1 CORRESPONDENCE: After the meeting, the developer had many calls for residents, some now in support of the project. The team has on -going efforts to get information out to residents. POST MEETING #1 CHANGES: After hearing many of the comments, there were changes made to reduce apartment units by nearly 10% and to pull apartments away from the borders. The total unit count was reduced, open space gathered toward the center of the project, refined stormwater to reflect neighbor concerns and site conditions and now accounts for the 100 year storm, and save many large trees on the site. The Oaks at MurraV Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 2 Notes: Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held two community meetings on the same night at Hampstead Annex Auditorium on Hwy 17. The first meeting for residents to the north of the site occurred from 5:30 -6:30 PM. The second meeting for residents to the south /east of the site occurred from 7:00 -8:00 PM on November 12, 2019. As mentioned in the meeting summary, we wanted to accommodate at least as many folks as attended our first community meeting, but the closest largest venue suitable for the crowd only held 250 people, so we divided the meeting to hear from everyone. The first of the two meetings had approximately 180 people in attendance and the second meeting was a mixture of people staying from the first meeting and new attendees. This second meeting had 80 people. The attached agenda covers the presentation from the development team to the participants. Then the floor was opened to questions and comments. The following is a summary of that community input: - Schools are overcrowded and traffic to those schools is congested (Answer: The developer has a meeting set with NHC Schools folks to discuss, but the traffic consultant, Ramey Kemp, addressed school traffic. Much of the traffic comments related to late busses and not enough bus drivers ) Porters Neck Road traffic will be made worse by apartments/ this project (Answer: Traffic Analysis shows Porters Neck Road is currently a Level of Service A road since the roundabout construction and that after the proposed project is built (using the previously proposed plan with 406 units instead of the current, reduced plan), the Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 23 Page 4 of 5 roundabout will experience a 1 second delay from current conditions at peak hour. And the Porters Neck /Market intersection will add approximately 2 cars at peak hour. However, after the Military Cutoff bypass is complete (anticipated 2022 prior to this project build out), approximately 9,000 cars / day are anticipated to be routed away from this intersection at Porters Neck Road. The intersection after bypass construction is anticipated to operate in quicker movements from either pre or post project development. Stormwater designed to the 100 year storm is not enough (Answer: The stormwater in previous plans has been further evaluated, soil testing has now been performed, and we confirmed we can provide a stormwater design in excess of the County's 25 year requirement. We understand there are concerns from neighbors and have offered a solution that should improve the situation well beyond the minimum requirements). Emergency Services response times were reported at 12 -25 minutes both at this meeting and Meeting #1. (Answer: We heard this at the first meeting and this one, Paramounte Engineering spoke with Fire Marshal David Stone to determine if there was a problem in this area that we are not aware of, if this project can be designed in a way to alleviate any concerns, and if there is something off -site the developer may be able to offer or assist with to help alleviate any concerns. Mr. Stone stated the Porters Neck Communities are served at the some rate as others in the county with fire's first responder typical response times in the 4 -7 minute range and EMS or law enforcement in the 9 minute range. Mr. Stone stated that the fire station existing across from the Shiraz Way entrance of this development would promote one alternate route through the neighborhood for fire and EMS to travel from this station if traffic on Porters Neck Road is impassible, especially since speed bumps are not proposed in our neighborhood. Regarding off -site improvements, Mr. Stone reiterated NCDOT and our traffic consultant in saying that there is not room to widen Porters Neck Road, so no off -site improvement, such as adding a lane, are really possible without taking property from homes along Porters Neck Road. Futch Creek proposed extra turn lane will not fix the traffic problem. An extra right turn lane will not help since the majority of traffic comes out of this intersection and goes to the Uturn to head towards Wilmington. The extra lane will not be used (Answer: Our traffic consultant presented the findings that the intersection queuing time could be nearly cut in half with the addition of a right turn lane, and the extra lane would allow everyone (after the project is built) to cycle through the intersection in 1 light cycle. He further stated that this is a proposal to the community first to add an additional turn lane. If accepted, it would be reviewed by NCDOT and WMPO. They may have comments, want changes, corroborate with the neighbors stated regarding amount of Uturn activity, etc. However, this has not been addressed with NCDOT at this time. If it is desired, the developer is agreeing to pursue this turn lane as a way to help the community. If it is not desired, we do not need to pursue the Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 24 Page 5 of 5 additional turn lane. To date, there has been no requirement from the TIA for the additional turn lane or any other improvement off -site. - There was a death at this intersection recently, this development will bring more accidents and fatalities. (Answer: Ramey Kemp submitted TIA prior to the recent fatality, so that report did not take that into account. However, the consultant responded that he would follow up with NCDOT after the meeting since a fatality triggers a review of the intersection and what could be done to make the situation better. Those findings will be coordinated and addressed in any improvements that happen at that intersection. - There were many comments questioning the validity and methods of the traffic report. Statistics used in the report were questioned. Traffic counts were questioned. The method of traffic analysis was questioned. There was mention of another traffic consultant hired by Vineyard Plantation who had an alternate report contradicting Ramey Kemp's findings. (Response: Ramey Kemp's traffic consultant explained accepted methodologies and how he arrived at each of the questioned statistics. He further explained that the counts were performed over a 48 hour period in a time designated by NCDOT/WMPO scoping meeting (while school was in session). The means and methods of the study have been approved by NCDOT/WMPO. At the time of the community meeting, those two entities are reviewing the findings of the TIA before issuing comments on potential improvements. - Apartments are not wanted here — Logan builds nice single family homes. Build those, can't we propose all duplex and single family that would not be met with opposition. What kind of apartments will they be, what price point? (Response: We have heard this statement, and we are presenting a plan with apartments, but with many concessions to prove that Logan does want to build a nice neighborhood that works with the community. The Logan team evaluated the site for single family and duplexes, and the price of the land prevents the developer from considering single family and duplexes only as an alternative. Furthermore, Logan is planning luxury apartments on the high end geared toward one of the fastest growing market, 62+ looking for rentals. The developer feels this project targets that market and fits well into the Porters Neck Community. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 25 Mo luting DI-to: NEDDE ❑IJ 12, 2019 T❑❑ ❑ 1111❑ ❑ ❑M ❑rr❑❑ ❑EI-❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 1111 ❑-❑❑ M ❑❑FIM❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑d ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 1111❑❑❑ General Note: Two meetings will be held this evening. Both meetings will follow the format and general meeting guidelines as follows. We ask that you abide by these guidelines so participants have a chance to hear the presentation and to ask questions. Meeting 1 from 5:30 -6:30 PM will be held for residents living to the north of the project site. We ask you to exit the building from 6:30 -6:45 so the meeting 2 participants can enter between 6:45 -7:00. The time for exiting will be signaled by the lights flicking on and off. If you refuse to leave, you will be preventing the next group of your neighbors from participating. Meeting 2 from 7:00 — 8:00 PM will be held for residents living to the south /east of the project site. We ask you to exit the building no later than 8:30 PM. Notes from the building manager and development team: o Please do not bring food or drink into the auditorium • The auditorium's building occupancy is approximately 250 people, so we recommend you appoint representatives to attend the meeting in the event attendance exceeds occupancy. This agenda acts as a presentation summary in the event you are unable to attend either meeting. • Doors will be monitored and locked to ingress travel when the building reaches capacity • All doors remain open to egress travel at all times • In the event of emergency, exits are located in the center, front of the building and at each end of the first floor hall. Meeting Agenda & Discussion Points: 1. Introduction 2. Presentation Items will Include: Summary of changes from the 1St community meeting plan to the current plan • Reduced apartment unit count by approx. 10% by removing (2) 12 unit apartment buildings • Increased single family homes by 8 units • Removed 1 duplex building (2 units) • Less overall density o (9/30/19 community meeting plan had 406 total units, current plan has 388 total units) • Pulled apartments towards center of site to further buffer adjacent properties • Added neighborhood parks, open space, and increased buffers • Saved large trees on site- located primarily at Old Market Street • New stormwater design with increased capacity from County's required 25 year storm event to 100 year storm event • Developer is proposing to construct an off -site traffic improvement to alleviate some traffic concerns (this is not part of the recommendations included in the Traffic Impact Analysis, this is offered in direct response to public input received at the last community meeting). All scenarios below represent the full buildout condition. o Add 1 right turn lane on Futch Creek at the Market Street /Hwy 17 traffic light. • After this proposed project is built, queuing time at traffic light reduces from 42 seconds to 27 seconds • This results in all traffic clearing the light in one cycle • The existing Porters Neck Rd. roundabout delay is increased by 1 second at the peak traffic hours • The existing Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection delay increases by 2 seconds (1 -2 extra cars added to queuing • After the Military Cutoff portion of the bypass is constructed (anticipated completion in mid - summer 2022), traffic along Market Street (US 17) is expected to be approximately 20% less (removing approximately 9,000 cars from passing through the intersection at Porters Neck Rd /Market). • Resulting signal adjustments at Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection are anticipated to lessen wait time at the intersection from the existing conditions (including this proposed project build out). • The current 2022 completion happens before The Oaks at Murray Farm will be built out (projected 2023 or later). 3. Discussion - If you have additional comments or questions beyond the meeting, please visit the "contact" portion of the project website at www.oaksatmurrayfarm.com Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 26 PARAMOUNTE N C:� I N E E R I M G. I M �_ October 31, 2019 RE: Second Community Meeting for: Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. invite you to a second community meeting on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. After having conversations with various members of the community since our last meeting, we have received feedback, and we want to compile the interested parties again to present our revised plans and current information to the larger community group(s). Because there was such a large group of community members in attendance in our first meeting, we looked for a meeting venue both close to your homes and one that can hold large groups. We have reserved the closest, large venue that agreed to host our community meeting. However, the Hampstead Annex is only able to hold 230 seated people at one time and about 250 people with some standing. (The latter is very close to the auditorium's building occupancy limit for fire safety). We want to be sure everyone has an opportunity to attend, so we will be holding two community meetings back to back to accommodate anyone interested in the project. In order to meet the venue's fire safety requirements, we respectfully ask you to comply with the following: If you live to the north of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. If you live to the east or south of the proposed project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00. If you do not know which group you fall into, please refer to the enclosed plan's north arrow and vicinity map to determine direction of you home in relation to the project site. Please understand that the auditorium's doors will be closed if we reach capacity. We recommend that homeowners' associations and large common - interest groups appoint representatives to attend their respective meeting so those people can get the information out to the larger community in the event we reach the venue's fire safety capacity. The subject tracts of land remain the same as the land you saw in the last meeting. That includes the ± 51.39 acre tract of land bordered by Old Market St., Tibbys Dr., and Shiraz Way and is further identified as New Hanover County Parcels: R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R02900- 004- 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R02900- 004- 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, and R02900- 004- 010 -000 Since our last community meeting, we have submitted a conditional rezoning application to New Hanover County, but we are continuing to work through questions and comments from the community before finalizing our proposed conditional rezoning plan and setting the Planning Board meeting date. Please reference the enclosed current conditional rezoning plan and join us on the 12th for a look at larger scale plans. Our development team will be on hand to answer questions and discuss the project with neighbors. Community members who live north of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. Community members who live east or south of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 7:00 -8:00. When: November 12, 2019 Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium 15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443 I ❑EIDEMA DR ®E M Board of ComrAi_o_-MwuR3::Pl=etH1Uary 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 27 -L -f- r v 1-= N C-:; 1 N E E F2 I N G I N C: _ October 31, 2019 RE: Second Community Meeting for: Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm — REVISED SITE PLAN Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. recently sent you an invitation to our second community meeting. In that invitation mailing, you received a copy of the first community meeting plan for reference. This mailing provides you a copy of the revised plan to be discussed at the November 12, 2019 community meeting at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. We are providing you both plans in advance of the meeting so you can see what has changed including reduction in units, saving the site's stately trees and stormwater adjustments. We also have included new park and open spaces areas all while adding additional buffers from adjacent properties to the site. Please join us to hear full details on the 12th. Just a reminder on meeting times: Community members who live to the north or northeast of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. Community members who live to the east /southeast, south, or west /southwest of the proposed project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00. When: November 12, 2019 Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium 15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443 ❑77 ❑ TIVEMA DRIDE ❑ EE[VIE10DDDO Ell ❑ Pn: --U-L1 I I I I I Board of Commilsioners + iFebruary 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 28 Qninmunb Megu�§ i ar C Ei�� i1 i €arid Ei s�nin� } c' u t i Icy an i7 +el+ i r5. Lnc_ PMO ca N amp: TI7E A f'Rwrric4p[s_ -al PorteF -s Ckdks The F�ese� aye gl" !'�i1e� Na me Pro ,4,ddrmq f Neigh hicor}w(A Plane Number 5 nna it Addr • 1 _ a p ,vv d'# } IF- ,. irevIP&P4 XG1057 , LAAJ -rlM-r aP QW&JU61 6^ gin - 3f4)- -7-f,3 Aasd�O -%P rrms),L �A 131- 3 m 1 IL - 9 1 —023 149 Wa466 X jjrrjj j p L 1-0 57. Obt lip I JC 7 0 Vol -' - —' '' fry r ►� r* I� , Ej ,c Ipw A .€ L-' ' _ J it Ar F C .knchur :BMAhYl U LLIrch Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 29 ° nnbcrYWL ZD19 b-00 P.M Name Address Phan ## Email Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 30 Community Mgctiny rnr -C padilional R nning Rce iics] t�E Lai-An Ykvgl N, Ins Project flame = 'l`h.c A rja cv s, a1 PmbrTs Oalas T'hr Resme at P-arteg Oaks Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 LL +55 lSap lfil (:hpren ITEM: 10- 8 - 31 L�SLLl11�ILT� }III, LC�I 60D P_M ca,-" r) J" VU (No;9 F � c�e- e( cs 0 ftj.Ue 'Lr *f :garm F , ,yam y y7 t +s rE - .� R -�t4�` Imo'# c41 -4r d, (L Y�-rr,PLj ; if Leo S K qtr A 4.0 LIC1,4 y 0 0 - L( Ly - rr J l qqD �€5 say-] ti l l =Q5irN I AM AMY IP a -i" Lo r , n_ cam. C,ts C e. ,f or.c:i',�i �. u q La -t, r4y-.i VI /160 Ir .� Name Address Phone# Email Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 33 M, a MO s 0711M �Wok 0450 ? i v 10 :lr,,rlal Rc�ej,tt pg Rpqupgr by T xVo Dr°wolI, Ins:. +- f I s� f pW III SA 1 WO M * P t d � r+ 10� °1 KPIR Mn 2r. ME ML a . i` , f r - - . r. � •' , � ate, �- Board of Commissioners - FebruarV 3, 2020 f I s� f pW III SA 1 WO M (�(%% � Proim-t Nuw.: Tfic Apja•i gt-q at P-Ofters Ook The 9 Q-X. poners Ouk�% fFnL - r )Aj ess F ekia-,r-, VAI rt4q Dekwa dab 2 I r Mank - C24- Ale, -)Oolan-e4 - - 'S 3 A tv 4 Wz 4 -.T 9QZ24 - Z3 I%X—V 4A Ww,-% -Z af, Y ni kdf-� 171 l77 -rL twcn, iv-na Ofm Le ja Board of Commissione s February 3, 2020 ELVIL Aiwlwr bapdsi u-1humh ITEM: 10- 8 - 35 APW J-b�p 6;1)0 PA 0� c6;iLST CQTPFPkLDj SY, Mea-cin undijonal Rerxm ng "LLest D 1401 wgjpc7s. Inc. + - ' � NS111t *: The p2rirfi�al:+ -at T'erdm (inks 'the }�e�e ye a1 briers O k ; 7"Ir gtt o -pouf ye Ian ;NOZ 3 Q. c-", qOq r I-I'E E•F a- -3 4 � 5921 C r, L _r- r . kl s v _ ,,P+: -- ,i1-1- Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Rnclix BVdtL ICbLffcl ITEM: 10- 8 - 36 Septcmtcr H li. 2019 rx � 9.- f q ii r r7 61.00 RM 4 c�muni Pwl[�► Zc�nql il N)nal Re L�Xti ng Jqul b[,n7, E'roiec[ Nanh - Tt APijrtm. its a= Ylcir�ers Oaks The gcr�r Ott '[}al€� a n Pro Addren } N�" U ' borhood Mine Number EmaM Add rem f F47 Jl dq e:e3 J-�6 - ; F'.FaLs3i� II ThIf.4� -Y re , , i `{ - }l �" - I e P r r }y' 6 � 6r yy L1J s 4 it W i Sf 5 ' i e6 1 � w 'iL J fj�1 f j y -Cot 0 Jw .�1p,Rtf� f pf ,j1J d 0 �,I�5''y 1 De Hy ro� � ' • + f iJ ' - _ ep 72"', J e ZZA LzA 44r T ° ' i ,r F �8 .c-l-LA Wgry K • -- .. • �1 ll• — s hd —zi AriL6W MIDI iSt ( hl" Board of Commissioners - ITEM: 10- 8 February 33.. 2020 ac }� +� - 37 7�� 6.-W P.M Name Address Phone# Email _ ...... ....�4 z Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 38 Name Address PhonAlt r-mmi1 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 39 Name Address Phone# Email Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 40 Name Add rp- c. -r. DkAmin4# r--a - as Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 41 on Name Address Phinntm rM_%;I Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 42 Amfxir Sup ;mL CNILRUIi .i il t7ui7.i Twl ire tier C'�ndiLulFL�,1 F n nj..R- c_gucsL by . can Mi vcCamm Inc. Pr coiucl N 3111C- ` FLO a wnents gi Pcwtc O;sk.% 'Tlle Boogie of Portm Oaks. � r {� s fM s tea, �J �`1 . Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 43 pieoir:a�r _�y�l . 211 I N0O P.M Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 AFWIK,r BLupiil ('n arch ITEM: 10- 8 - 44 -Lwher y Xh. 2019 6-D] P-M il I, . IL , ilk ++ P FAW ■ / t e e � MMEM� + FF r!!p 3J Ii d Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 AFWIK,r BLupiil ('n arch ITEM: 10- 8 - 44 -Lwher y Xh. 2019 6-D] P-M Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 45 I "V Cs,-L ��-p E GO Ir UO M�g Wj Prig mt Name- The Martmcm art ftrters Oaks The Rcscr-c at Pan-ers Oaks Na jw Pn-Lyperiv AdArcm I , Nciehhnirbo-nd Pkame No-Inbrir Email Addrem Board of Commissioners- February 3, 2020 Arichor I Church ITEM: 10- 8 - 46 vl)� 2319 - .9 bpl ?.LL71� ,� a0k- 6-W P.M j sg:, -4nw .8112,-Cf�t L-131L Mw A 2 C oo -a f Ow6e, vic- I e 1 4 (4- rq.4.v4, Ltj Le, C.1 q n och L3 49 d 46�7 r, 0) —Jr z Lie% %C%67lrL9l) L s�7� lu L Board of Commissioners- February 3, 2020 Arichor I Church ITEM: 10- 8 - 46 vl)� 2319 - .9 bpl ?.LL71� ,� a0k- 6-W P.M Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 47 6 � a' �, I I Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 48 II 17 .73. I eoffi r LSZ ti k� 25 V, �� M N jj R� i �7 -T. Px Lm IM r1i L4 1-7 in.. �A r Februar 2( ITEM: 10- 8 - 49 R� i �7 -T. Px Lm IM r1i L4 1-7 in.. �A missioners - Februar 2( ITEM: 10- 8 - 49 R� i �7 -T. Px Lm IM r1i L4 (LI, Y+. cammurtity Mt'etiar n(fi6ga ] R njag "L1est b an Liev-elopm. Inc. Projeci N rne:_T]w Apan -w % Pa rs QRkE The Rc5mT -at Fortm (9ak-s f t� y c:: �. All LFiUC13WEst Church Board of Commissioners - Februarys . 2020�� ITEM: 10- 8 - 50 q / el- DO R_I4� i,P M1 c i - �'Lf �N T�'. 2—'v} di L. ""L - I_, .I— { L+d 7 r I I Nil2i LF ! C f. ILI r d t _ '# ! 7-1-/ r } +I' { 4 J { 1 &5 � C VA lk L 1 t w° f t� y c:: �. All LFiUC13WEst Church Board of Commissioners - Februarys . 2020�� ITEM: 10- 8 - 50 q / el- DO R_I4� A41, R,4, Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 51 Y- W-Ar j �W CAI i F pyJ�) blk C-A( ;>r X611 � r ILIL c pa%:x� .. RYA r .J &4 3 71tytml-t 6�CT-2& U4-+ ILA �J" -r,,If - - , r . o Vv-trh° I jo 4141i if wir", St -71 f, 7//4 �•7 lat tu,� -� Air - f` Blip- Af- 'r q io - Lt 3 O I t * .fir( -vn l 1o,-;4 $ �i Br�f1, m i ioners - February 3, 2020 3o Loa 1 I V ki T ckl Lice vj- p 044,b(cJ1F,.1 $dn-z, Ve.AAa.� �f Tv M6c�a.AJ WO 9651�C.jAve - )11 -1112 Ssego 61 @ HOMAAL, c i c ck 1WL7 R -MCA Sr Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 53 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request bV Logan Developers Inc Protect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm / Name Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address �t � ,c t 6 3, o ��' ✓.�.t CoTTi�' C� . Co �j f'Q �� 1 ") v1 Zi0 N Gc— 70-� -2-37�7 � r 9/0- qjl -)-to 7 NNA 102- s f c c MW" G S It 1 Ar-�"d ZU W N t bin 866' b' v, rz-j "eC�.. v 401 4q3 -7aa j 7-W q-1 - 0 O'l 17CJ�IilLCS P a tNl Ol iCelrs 0.® �, SSI 1 e Dc • XPI 11 7D '3111 0 ci 3 S -113 W) he w 1 Be 13 90 V C-rr,4�L, P,1 6jl :bD— 7TJ6 5-4,6 Hampstead Annex Building Auditom Nov h 2", 2019 5:30 P.M Mard of Commissioners - February 3�Z01 ITEM: 10- 8 - 54 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2 ITEM: 10- 8 - 55 I&A—' i ""at Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm Nam Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number %0316 c4 1 ID —� Z — 7(4 e) / e. , Jam, a x 1021 Cr `,& Cn q 10 (02(0- 15`z�i le - id-t 7% ', i T Y w wt " ( � 6S—O P/Sl 7 /0— V tonal , CO 10 -r- Qa6 �, ► r c clI s� e�It- I (1a Hampstead Annex uilding Auditorium Noven<��2th, 2019 Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 56 Email Address ') - -(OV4 Rk 2 � v �'u Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm ame Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address 000) e �s `e ► t ,o �-� Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven��2`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 57 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: -The Oaks at Mu -rray Farm Name Propertv Address / Neighborhood Phone Numher Fmnil Atlrlrocc Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven�012`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 58 UYlr ;LS I Do, ea/Z7 << cat-, 74' q/"p 3 g' L K I G�i it es `J b b 3.rt�,�, - SM J �� elf D '� �'1Sr �,�e,5'�v I�Q 4 ! Q MSm �' a� AN tKi AL /�[� �� -S 7-Ti � b *kU kz CMG �� 74 - 7lS -g706 ✓.. �4r0,,�4 7 sc l d 3 !9 7 -9197 a itI .a 1z; 3 �i JOENWi#1,4 P �Co6.� �I ilOci v�� UG °JAG - (3 A4sabp(e cool ;cq 2340 tars a a,-7 CL ` ell n Srce,1 71 -TIA Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven�012`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 58 UYlr ;LS I Do, ea/Z7 << cat-, Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc " erne � 6a ks=at=Mtrrr-aV Fa r -- - -- Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium NoveyVWth, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 59 'Y WMEM �� ♦ 1 �� F AF • i °.e. ' MI �/ ♦ Ili% r /f ,� rim ME =V-J�ffl�ffl- �1� Fate w-*- Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium NoveyVWth, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February ITEM: 10- 8 - 59 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Dreier^+ Name The Qaks at l)A ay C-,r ivame Property Address/ Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address Z o io�is to g2r n e- C66S CC' Ck \6, 31 'NRn m --la-D-00T <2yoy l r 1A t Gv 3L (fn Zen `tco - 'T P- 7 4 vv, kd 4/ v nJf i -t W - 12 v fl cam I /i me A �4O D l- -' c c r� r 1c Z sc 10 1 r VIA�rice MS Gel .t f- �J `� q ►o ` W w" z n I Aftti oo w. ate e- KCam[6kec n Gb 1j 61 1 tr �- �`( t PS A- G14 9 3 U'S A,) p�Ilo-Gt a 7V- ,V-ic. s- an, Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12th, 2019 5:30 P. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 60 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc. Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 61 MMM /G cyfu Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Nuiect Nante. The Oaks at.Murray Farni Property. Address Neighbo X79 Z-1 TT S, v 7 I/ CUC) r-41 Li I L-0 1-j vlj ES Phone Number 1/7 Email Address %Ole 11 j ? Y- (fCL r>d)4 5 -2 -30�)W/ j e Hampstead Annex Building Audito N aory q 12t', 2019 Y 98aWd of Commissioners - Febru ITEM: 10- 8 - 62 7:00 P.M Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Pruiect Name. The Oaks at Murrav Fain, Name l Property Address/ Neighborhood n l 47 Win e- Ce �Ca✓ � tro 1 v vX CetoKtu -6 t` Vi,,,i-_ Err, cxw 0 6C3' Cv[ c"j 250 UU Phone Number Email Address Qf�t 5KU —G3�4� s e auto �lccr,/Jr d40 9lozg7 (,3g7 o4,n�bey �l o Z t7 Cv eI �aiG�l C 2- 7- f'6S�- �� 1 r� 9. /,o- 9 2. 1 -S-2 Si U �G t (� C•'t v� irQ¢- r/ �t 6L\ ` 7 2-:5 � IzJv 2 Lt 4La— 2 —� 1 e 1`0�, -�]� -► �S VV f�,e �� _ �� X31 -S-) C� Hampstead Annex Building Auditord of Commissioners - Februaryepp(f0121h1 2019 7:00 P.M ITEM: 10- 8 - 63 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Proiect Name. The Oaks at Murray Fa, in Hampstead Annex Building Auditord of Commissioners - February 3, Z0Y012tn 2019 7:00 P.M ITEM: 10- 8 - 64 Ila �G �J FAY O�Q� A ti \�P MFNOR �� 0PNks m P�Q m �o VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION W MR. H X I Ot EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE "- -- UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION i - EXISTING WATERMAI N EXISTING TREE, TYP. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 65 ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 388 UNITS 66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45'(3 STORIES) ± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING OAK TREES GRAVITY EWER MH (TYP.) 241nit Apt. 8" GRAVI SEWER( SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i A Unit Apt. dg Z 4 ow Apt" alas N 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (12 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r-- GATE a- M � � I 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING r PARKING PROVIDED: 55 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: I AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES w 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE U) w tY Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 65 ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 388 UNITS 66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45'(3 STORIES) ± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING OAK TREES GRAVITY EWER MH (TYP.) 241nit Apt. 8" GRAVI SEWER( SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i A Unit Apt. dg Z 4 ow Apt" alas N 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (12 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r-- GATE a- M � 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING r PARKING PROVIDED: 55 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: I AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 12 *44 = 528 PARKING PROVIDED: 539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 42 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 388 UNITS x .03 = 11.64 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.82 AC 5.83 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.82 AC 5.83 AC COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. WETLAND AREA, TYP. 55t- I I / I I ;-] �I� L ��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i� fit s WIN -' 2 g ■■■■ ■ II r ■ SETBACK TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP. rrl J� ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE DUPLEX, TYP. F GATE � (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r - - - - I i - -------- - O O O Q 11 1; iso s -ss -ss ` r ` 5 y 0 G Ole STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER ± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT - 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss Rq SS RR ' - - - Z Ell G VITY WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE ( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T TYP. 12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6 O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O 45' ROW �- - - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77 I _I I F--' - ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 % -41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��, I/ � � 36 / `` I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER (D I _ ` 43 i' I T _ � � ± 1.90 AC __ 1 a7 STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ / ± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING WATERMAIN 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U c� O U O Q W c� W W O I V CrIT1� nw F---I h--I ,W Z i 55t- I I / I I ;-] �I� L ��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i� fit s WIN -' 2 g ■■■■ ■ II r ■ SETBACK TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP. rrl J� ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE DUPLEX, TYP. F GATE � (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r - - - - I i - -------- - O O O Q 11 1; iso s -ss -ss ` r ` 5 y 0 G Ole STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER ± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT - 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss Rq SS RR ' - - - Z Ell G VITY WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE ( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T TYP. 12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6 O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O 45' ROW �- - - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77 I _I I F--' - ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 % -41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��, I/ � � 36 / `` I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER (D I _ ` 43 i' I T _ � � ± 1.90 AC __ 1 a7 STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ / ± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING WATERMAIN 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U c� O U O Q W c� W W O I V CrIT1� nw F---I h--I ,W Z O U) w tY U� W H Ln H � � N W�U o �h � o � H LL_ (� z O Lu O ^ IM U wo. �? z c 0 ��N z 3 c I ~a LU y 4-4 ^ `� s W r C\] biC �z A W W H H �U C',o ocz> N N Z O 11 O a� Q U) 2 z 00 0 O LL 0 (n J Q Z � } z 0 a C, L' H E0 0 Q Z LU w z W �0In O OJ�w o > zZY Q a �°T ww�?�0 o o�a 000 SEAL LP- 1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE Adiacent Property Owners - The Oaks at Murrav Farm STAKS MARIANNA 734 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 734 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON HENSHAW JUSTIN W TONYA A 8409 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8409 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON LAMBETH ROBERT L MARY G 709 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 709 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON ROWAN ROBERT 426 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 426 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON COVIL ELLIS M JR ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR TODD, NC 28684 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON SANFORD UNIE 0 321 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 321 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON BATTS RICHARD A MELISSA E 8401 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8401 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON OLONE DIANNE C 705 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 705 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON TODD JERRY W JR LEANN S 420 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 420 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON PINSON MICHAEL D SARAH M 430 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 430 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON GREINER FRANCES S 802 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 802 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON HARRISON RUSSELL D SR VERDALE D 208 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 208 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON SPENCER YVONNE D 508 TIBBY'S DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 508 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON FIDLER ANDREW F MARY E 438 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 438 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON WEAVER RONALD D KIMBERLY J 722 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 722 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BERRY COLLIN M SUSAN V 425 LADY BUG LANE WILMINGTON, NC 28411 425 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON MROZ GREGORY E RACHEL M 422 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 422 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 8330 MARKET ST WILMINGTON VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 730 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON PATTERSON RONALD JR JENNIFER 416 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 416 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON CAUDILL JEREMY RUSSELL JESSICA JO 1218 BOWFIN LN UNIT 2 CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 8417 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON GENES JOSHUA K SAMANTHA S 453 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 453 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON LATSTETTER ROBERT ANN 634 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 634 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON CUSHENBERRY JAMES ANGELA JANEY 629 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 629 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON NECHES WILLIAM TRUST PO BOX 10871 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 421 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON MCMULLAN THERESE M 11047 SCOTTS LANDING RD LAUREL, MD 20723 514 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BARNHILL STEVEN AMY 8421 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8421 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON THOMAS BRYAN C ETAL 1425 AVENEL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 609 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON ONATE JAMES F LAUREL H 608 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 608 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON DOLLAR DUSTY L JILL K 620 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 620 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON FILAK JEFFREY M CHRISTEL P 418 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 418 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BLTD PROPERTIES LLC 8405 FREESTONE AVE HENRICO, VA 23229 817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON KNITTEL PATRICK A BRITTANY E 713 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 713 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON BUCKINGHAM JAMES JR ELIZABETH 612 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 612 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON NESTER DALLAS G LYNNE W 225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8410 MARKET ST WILMINGTON ZIERMANN THOMAS R PATRICIA M 725 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 725 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8376 MARKET ST WILMINGTON HALL STEPHEN C JENNIFER 500 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 500 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON LEWIS CHARLES W E ELIZABETH 730 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 730 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 66 MARGUCCIO DAVID J WENDY E 606 WINERY WAY HARTWICK ROBERT W FARANAKA A 618 WINERY WAY CONKLIN MARCUS R 406 LADY BUG LN MCKOY HUBERT JEROME ALICE N 520 TIBBYS DR DEEN MICHELLE 305 PORTERS NECK RD KITCHEN CHARLES TABITHA A 8402 YEARLING LN USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W 325 BRETONSHIRE RD WHALEY FAMILY IRREVOCABLE ASSET PROT 625 WINERY WAY OPALKA SCOTT COLLEEN 434 CHABLIS WAY MARTIN DANNY CJR ANGELITA S 705 PORTERS NECK RD HALAC KENT E ALAI NA J KIM 742 WINERY WAY JAMES ELSIE C IV AMY W 516 TIBBYS DR ELKIN TIMMIE L CHERI P 404 TIBBY'S DR SHAW DANIEL 429 LADY BUG LN COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR RENYE KEITH E HEATHER L 430 CHABLIS WAY HARTZELLJOSHUA KIMBERLY JOY 715 PORTERS NECK RD ROBSON CHELSEA B SIMON D 428 TIBBYS DR MCDONALD TAMMY Y SEAN V 637 WINERY WAY EDWARDS MICHAEL DAYMA 512 TIBBYS DR FONVILLE RICHIE D CATHLEENA L 8418 YEARLING LN BUNN DEREK W ANGELA 8407 REISLING AVE HUDSON MICHAEL L DEANNA H 706 WINERY WAY LLOYD MANUEL W HELENA C 204 CHABLIS WAY MURRAY ROBERT C III ULRIKE H 8313 SHIRAZ WAY BASS JOEL PERCY II SANDRA C 511 TIBBYS DR CARTER DIANE H 313 PORTERS NECK RD LIOTTA RAY ETAL 729 WINERY WAY POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC JOHNSON KYLE C AMANDA T 8403 REISLING AVE MORGAN KENNETH TERESA 507 TIBBYS DR HOSS GREGG E HEIDI HANH THI 608 CHABLIS WAY PORTER ALTON G JOAN A 719 PORTERS NECK RD CAVAN JOHN JOANNE W 721 WINERY WAY KUPERUS RYAN KELLI 0 426 LADY BUG LN REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA I REEVES CHAD E PATRICIA C 401 LADY BUG LN SNEEDEN DAVID G ETAL 1840 LIVE OAK PKWY 5 ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST GATES ANDREW P STACEY N 8501 BISON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 TODD, NC 28684 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 67 606 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 618 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 406 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 520 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 305 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8402 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 8412 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 625 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 434 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 705 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 742 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 516 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 404 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 429 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 430 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 715 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 428 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 637 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 512 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8418 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 8407 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 706 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 204 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 8313 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON 511 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 313 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 729 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8342 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8403 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 507 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 608 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 719 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 721 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 426 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 417 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 401 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 207 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 805 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8380 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8501 BISON CT WILMINGTON RICKS BARBARA MELVIN 615 TIBBYS DR MARLOWE RONALD C 701 PORTERS NECK RD ROSSI RICHARD A ANDREA E 8406 YEARLING LN REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA 3301 BENSON DR COTHREN FAMILY TRUST 301 PORTERS NECK RD DALLOS RANDALL P KRISTIN M 8425 ROSEMARY LN COTHREN FAMILY TRUST 301 PORTERS NECK RD GUO LIANHONG L QINGNAN YAO 436 CLOVERDALE DR BASTIAN JARVIS R CATHERINE A 518 CHABLIS WAY TURNER CHRISTOPHER W JEANNE H 515 TIBBYS DR MICHAELSON MARTIN J ANN MCCARTHY JONATHAN ERIN 738 WINERY WAY KARAM BERNARD J EILEEN M 710 WINERY WAY NUNALEE WALTER H II ALLYN S 604 TIBBYS DR SMITH CRAIG ANDREA 8413 ROSEMARY LN OGDEN VOL FIRE DEPT INC ETAL 7375 MARKET ST SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST FORCINITO DAVID DANA 523 TIBBYS DR NICHOLSON MATTHEW S 410 LADY BUG LN DAVIDSON BRIAN CATHERINE S 8402 REISLING AVE READY CHRISTINE ETAL 2020 SCRIMSHAW PL HENDERSON JOHN A LAUREN 216 CHABLIS WAY KRISTY JACOB 414 LADY BUG LN MURRAY BEN G HEIRS 9225 PINEY WOODS RD WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER L MELISSA D 710 CHABLIS WAY WHITE MAJOR LEE IV 605 TIBBYS DR LEA ROBERT GLENN ETAL 519 MARKET ST COSTELLO RONALD J NORA A 604 CHABLIS WAY HIGH NICKOLAUS M KRISTY M 718 WINERY WAY BOWDITCH BRENT G SARA N 633 WINERY WAY MANCHESTER AARON D AMANDA P 304 CHABLIS WAY MADEJ MICHAEL SR DYLAH S 417 PORTERS NECK RD THOMAS TAD L REBECCA J 501 TIBBYS DR HERRING HERMON GREGORY 412 TIBBYS DR GREEN JAMES A JR VIVIAN T BONEAU ROBERT W LAURA K 8410 YEARLING LN DOWD GREGORY P JR KARYL R 613 TIBBYS DR BRIGGS PAUL PATRICIA 702 CHABLIS WAY JOSE KRISTOPHER M KRISTIN A 300 CHABLIS WAY SHAFFIN PROPERTIES LLC 1515 CHESTNUT ST MORGAN DAVID P MICHELLE S 630 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SUITE 535 RALEIGH, NC 27619 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WEXFORD, PA 15090 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 11171 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILLARD, NC 28478 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 11157 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 68 615 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 701 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8406 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 301 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8425 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 221 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 602 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 518 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 515 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 746 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 738 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 710 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 604 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8413 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 8310 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON 8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 523 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 410 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8402 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 102 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 216 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 414 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 710 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 605 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8320 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 604 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 718 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 633 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 304 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 417 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 501 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 412 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 97 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 8410 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 613 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 702 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 300 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 630 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD MURRAY ROBERT C JR EMMA Y TR 8370 MARKET ST COBLE RAY MARION KWANG HYONG 522 CHABLIS WAY ONUFROCK KENNETH MARIA 418 LADY BUG LN EUBANKS JAMES R JOAN C 718 CHABLIS WAY FIELDS HARRY M LEEANNE P 437 LADY BUG LN LONG ROBERT DEVITT 217 PORTERS NECK RD LEA R GLENN ETAL THOMAS RONALD D TRACY J 510 CHABLIS WAY JAGUTIS JARED BRONWYN 702 WINERY WAY VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC STANFIELD JEFFREY L KATHRYN C 714 WINERY WAY VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC 3301 BENSON DR LOEHR GREGORY B AMANDA E 442 CHABLIS WAY ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD TERRY ADRIENNE R 701 WINERY WAY BECKWITH RAYMOND J LAUREN 454 LADY BUG LN USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W 325 BRETONSHIRE RD EDWARDS RICKY N KAREN 8406 MARKET ST KLINE SCOTT A AMY C 638 WINERY WAY LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P 8356 MARKET ST GIRARD DENNIS J 424 TIBBYS DR BALDINELL RICHARD JESSICA A 8405 ROSEMARY LN CONNER TRACIE LANCE 610 WINERY WAY DEGROOT RACHEL LYNN SANCHEZ CADE A ALEXA N 414 CHABLIS WAY MIKLOUCICH FRANCIS J JR LINDSAY 412 CHABLIS WAY WOODS BERNICE ROGER 299 HOLDER RD NAGLE CHRISTOPHER M ANGELA PAIGE COI 645 WINERY WAY NGUYEN HAI D LOAN P 446 LADY BUG LN CIVELLI RICHARD V JENNIFER L 8414 YEARLING LN CROOM CHRISTOPHER B AMY L 726 CHABLIS WAY BOYELL JOSEPH J KATHLEEN A SMYTHE 308 CHABLIS WAY HUFHAM FORREST MELISSA 8429 ROSEMARY LN OLSON PETER RICHARD 601 TIBBYS DR COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR GOSLINE DENNIS YVETTE M 8674 GRAYSON PARK DR LEEDS JONATHAN P JENNIFER E H 504 TIBBYS DR LONG JACOB R BRITTANY 402 LADY BUG LN BAUCOM KEVIN E DEBRA P 641 WINERY WAY REAL SOUND VENTURES LLC 2317 LYNNWOOD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 RALEIGH, NC 27609 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 7 NANUET, NY 10954 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BALTIMORE, OH 43105 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 TODD, NC 28684 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 69 801 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8390 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 522 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 418 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 718 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 437 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 203 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 510 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 702 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 642 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 714 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 614 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 442 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 725 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 701 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 454 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8414 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8406 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 638 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8356 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 424 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8405 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 610 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 408 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 414 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 412 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 524 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 645 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 446 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8414 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 726 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 308 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 8429 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 601 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 213 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 504 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 402 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 641 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 713 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON POORE LEE L 212 CHABLIS WAY MUIR GARY S AMIEE L 422 LADY BUG LN HIATT ROBERT C ETAL 8417 ROSEMARY LN WASSERBERG MARTIN J ETHEL D 8406 REISLING AVE DE LA ROSA DAVID YACKELINE M 433 LADY BUG LN WOOD WILLIAM MARY 734 CHABLIS WAY FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST 421 TIBBYS DR LETTS PAUL TRACY B 317 PORTERS NECK RD MANN JASON D ERIN E 809 PORTERS NECK RD DEMARCO TERESA M RANDY 722 WINERY WAY CARR DANIEL C SHENAN J 1461 FINAL LANDING LN FICKEN ROLF H LORI A 622 WINERY WAY GATWOOD ELDEN JOHN 519 TIBBYS DR GREEN CHRISTABELL 101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD HESSENIUS JAY S BRANDI 706 CHABLIS WAY MAKO KOURTNEY C 733 WINERY WAY WARREN JOHN D 501 PORTERS NECK RD JONES APRIL B 405 LADY BUG LN NESTER DALLAS LYNNE W 225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR TYLER STEPHEN A DOROTHY J 804 PORTERS NECK RD FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST 421 TIBBYS DR BISSELINK FRANK HBM JEAN M 8433 ROSEMARY LN CHAMP MCD -DAVIS FOUNDATION PO BOX 1268 HOLT REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES INC PO BOX 53157 MARLING JAMES B ETAL 721 PORTERS NECK RD LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P 8350 MARKET ST WHELDON CHARLES R 717 PORTERS NECK RD COLENDA BENJAMIN E HEATHER A 813 PORTERS NECK RD BLACHER RYAN D JESSICA C 626 WINERY WAY POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC PO BOX 4014 ZHAO YAN CHONG HUA LIN 408 CHABLIS WAY MILLIKEN GAIL GEORGE W 4473 AMELIA CT BOUGHTON RICHARD RJR JENNIFER 616 CHABLIS WAY POPE JERRY W 400 TIBBYS DR DEXTER STACY P PATRICIA L 508 SHUNEY ST SANTANIELLO AMATO ELAINE M 409 LADY BUG LN BLTD PROPERTIES LLC 8405 FREESTONE AVE SORENSEN SHAUN 17 SLOOP ST AEIN MARGARET 717 WINERY WAY CRUMRINE KEVIN T CHRISTINA B 621 WINERY WAY ADAMS ANDREW D JODI N 714 CHABLIS WAY Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 70 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28402 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 HENRICO, VA 23229 SWANSBORO, NC 28584 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 212 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 422 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8417 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 8406 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 433 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 734 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 421 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 317 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 809 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 722 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 726 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 622 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 519 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 706 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 733 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 501 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 405 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8408 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 804 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8362 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8433 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 1011 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8312 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 721 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8350 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 717 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 813 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 626 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8318 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 408 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 617 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 616 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 400 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 401 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 409 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 309 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 717 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 621 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 714 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON HOLLIMAN GREGORY C REGINA T 738 CHABLIS WAY WAGNER TRACY L 220 CHABLIS WAY MESSINEO MICHAEL CINDEE 612 CHABLIS WAY MITCHELL WADE S TRUST NUMBER TWO 2616 HIBERNIA ST PERDUE MICHAEL W KAYOKO M 8410 REISLING AVE RAYMER MELISSA E 312 CHABLIS WAY Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 71 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 DALLAS, TX 75204 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 738 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 220 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 612 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 600TIBBYSDR WILMINGTON 8410 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 312 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E F? I N G, I N C. The Oaks at Murray Farm Stormwater Supplemental Information As part of the Oaks at Murry Farm project, and any other project in the county, the applicant understands the sensitivity and importance in both controlling the stormwater runoff from our site and maintaining the existing drainage patterns from our adjacent properties. To that end, we have performed the necessary on the ground surveying, investigation, soil testing, wetland delineation and meeting with landowners that live in this area to determine the most advantageous design to meet the points stated above. The applicant by its own accord is placing a condition on the site of controlling the runoff from the 10 inch — 24 -hour storm (which is the 100 yr storm as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design Manual), which is significantly greater than the County required 8.05 inch — 24 -hour storm (which is the 25 -yr event as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design Manual). In addition, the current drainage ditch (creek) that flows through this property will not be filled in or cut off any existing drainage. The creek will only be piped minimally for the road crossing required for the site. The stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds in the middle of the site and an infiltration basin on the eastern property line near Shiraz Way. The infiltration basin was chosen in that location based on the soils test performed by a registered soil scientist, his test yielded an infiltration rate that measured over 20 inches/hr which deems it a perfect site for infiltration (preliminary calculations have been run utilizing a 10 in/hr infiltration rate to remain conservative). As part of this infiltration device, strict specifications will be provided during the construction phase to maintain the natural soil parameters, ie, to not disturb the baseline soils which can cause such devices to not function in the manner intended. An operations and maintenance agreement will also be required to ensure continual maintenance after construction. The applicant in other developments has built such devices and has the experience and construction expertise to have such facilities function as intended. During downstream outfall analysis, it was determined that there are some existing residential properties that have low elevations on their property without a true outfall. With this in mind the preliminary site plan has been adjusted to account for the stormwater management discharging to the three well defined outfall ditches (the two ditches through the middle of the property and the roadside swale along Porters Neck Rd). The existing runoff from the proposed development property to these low areas will effectively be reduced as the built - upon area from the development will be collected and conveyed to the stormwater control measures where it will be treated and over detained to meet the aforementioned requirements. For the downstream outfalls, the design team will analyze and coordinate information/findings with New Hanover County Engineering during the permitting process. However, with placing the 100 yr storm condition on the site, the downstream features will not be affected adversely by the construction of this site. 1 2 2 C 1 N E M A D R I V E W I L M I N G T ❑ N, N C 2 S 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 9 - 1 �G �J J � FINy O P A Pti MFN�FN 5 oRitrF yq << sNOP�S O p,FzO��JE �m �o VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION �I W X �w I X O I� IE EXISTING TREE, TYP. EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION EXISTING WATERMAI N I" 111 W oners - ITEM: 10- 9 - 2 "441 ' w� ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW - DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.33 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 384 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING LARGE TREES ± 1.08 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE 8" GRAVITY SEWER (TYP ) W �O �J ■J 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET Existing Ditch to Be Cleaned & Stabilized; to Remain Unpiped SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 12 *44 = 528 PARKING PROVIDED: 539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 42 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQURED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 384 UNITS x.03 = 11.52 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN. ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN. COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. 24 UNIT APARTM T GRAVITY SEWER MH - BUILDING, TYP. (TYP.) (12 TOTAL BUILDIN S) GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA, NOTES THIS TYP. SHEET Proposed Existing Culvert Pond with Outfall into Stream ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN S ACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN P Y AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE PEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PA GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP. NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.) SHEET ea9 kb %bFhl�kbldd z: - ed9 STORMWATER I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3 - ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC 24'Unit APt. BTtlg I . L 24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH 20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) Stormwater Pond Outfalls to i i i i i i i i Ditch z 3 MR b rd SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING- 1 . ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES- 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) I W W Q W - _ Z _ FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss • 8" W ERM N (TYP) G VITY FIRE SEW MH -A (TYP.) I I HYD NT - W I (TYP.) O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A 11 1 16 1 1 1 0 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I. \ 12 , -- - -- - 45' ROW O O ��- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ \ /� T j� 16 17 1 35 �`♦ O �� O �i I �_��r_�__�}- __T__�- I� -- - - - - -- - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I _ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��n 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; 0:1 I I �`�� ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 ' 28 `\ 33 ` , /�, 56 \ \` 51 \, 1 _L_.�----- 1-- L- - -� - -� I 3s / O ' zs i 3o i 31 i 32 \ \O �� STORMWATER I 3s • > 4s INFILTRATION BASIN O �s - -- r- - - - -- ±1.90 AC I BUFFER/OPEN l ao' - -- / _ - \ Ia1 I RMWATER I I SPACE 0 js! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47 1.29 AC I I 1 Q , as , as , O \ .: i, -� - - - - - - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/ -_�- - - VEGETATIV UFFER Stormwater Pond Outfalls to Ditch nn PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD ± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT _z 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE \ \ \ \ / Existing Ditch Soils Tested in Infiltration Basin proved Infiltration Rate is Very High; Infiltration Rate 20" / Hr. f--� -I CJ� Existing Swale As Outfall for Infiltration Basin U 0 w Culvert Takes Water Q W from Swale to Adjacent Ditch W W t� O I V J nW i� W Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' a z I O Z ea9 kb %bFhl�kbldd z: - ed9 STORMWATER I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3 - ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC 24'Unit APt. BTtlg I . L 24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH 20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) Stormwater Pond Outfalls to i i i i i i i i Ditch z 3 MR b rd SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING- 1 . ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES- 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) I W W Q W - _ Z _ FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss • 8" W ERM N (TYP) G VITY FIRE SEW MH -A (TYP.) I I HYD NT - W I (TYP.) O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A 11 1 16 1 1 1 0 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I. \ 12 , -- - -- - 45' ROW O O ��- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ \ /� T j� 16 17 1 35 �`♦ O �� O �i I �_��r_�__�}- __T__�- I� -- - - - - -- - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I _ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��n 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; 0:1 I I �`�� ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 ' 28 `\ 33 ` , /�, 56 \ \` 51 \, 1 _L_.�----- 1-- L- - -� - -� I 3s / O ' zs i 3o i 31 i 32 \ \O �� STORMWATER I 3s • > 4s INFILTRATION BASIN O �s - -- r- - - - -- ±1.90 AC I BUFFER/OPEN l ao' - -- / _ - \ Ia1 I RMWATER I I SPACE 0 js! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47 1.29 AC I I 1 Q , as , as , O \ .: i, -� - - - - - - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/ -_�- - - VEGETATIV UFFER Stormwater Pond Outfalls to Ditch nn PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD ± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT _z 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE \ \ \ \ / Existing Ditch Soils Tested in Infiltration Basin proved Infiltration Rate is Very High; Infiltration Rate 20" / Hr. f--� -I CJ� Existing Swale As Outfall for Infiltration Basin U 0 w Culvert Takes Water Q W from Swale to Adjacent Ditch W W t� O I V J nW i� W Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' a z O Z I— W N z O U W W d O F- Z W W O U W > w of U� W �T1 OWN �U W z H 0 O r� O z Z OoWZ �_4 v J WU z _ ow 0o � N 0� OC IU 00 a� W O Z U t7 W W H ~ 0 �o o� N N Z all O o7 Q U 00 Z ry O O a¢ Z Z U �� (D° w F- zLLjO W p � Z > o > Z W O U J J W Z d ()dli� >Z W J�> U 0 OWOOU SEAL LP- 1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 10 - 1 �G ,�G �J ,�o J � e�RNFyroJgr ��5 FwY OAP o� A MFi y�FR 5 OP`�S O �a VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE �\ NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: ± 2.12 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH OTHER AMENITIES POSSIBLE INCLUDING: COURTYARD, CLUBHOUSE & POOL, DOG PARK, AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES PRESERVE EXISTING LARGE TREES, INTEGRATE IN OPEN SPACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) POSSIBLE LEASING OFFICE/ CLUBHOUSE AMENITIES EXISTING TREE, TYP. EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 STORY, 12 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (1 TOTAL BUILDING) Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 11 - 1 ►W x r� H� X gfil w - x ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) "00000 SEEMMEN F I In �=__ Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l. tl_v-qvv 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 4 *44 = 176 30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING Apt Bldq. j 16 Unit ' 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) cam} 314 ADA SPACES: 16 Unit APt. B tlq. GARAGES: ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) "00000 SEEMMEN F I In �=__ Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l. tl_v-qvv 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 4 *44 = 176 30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING 6 *30 = 180 22 SPACES PER 12 UNIT BUILDING 1 *22 = 22 PARKING PROVIDED: 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) SURFACE SPACES: 314 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 63 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQURED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 8 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH w APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED) PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN. ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN. COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. 8" GRAVITY SEWER (TYP.) - 2 STORY, 16 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP (6 TOTAL BUILDINGS) ± 0.31 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA, NOTES THIS TYP. SHEET a W Apt. o"T 16 nit Apt. B dg. m0 m 1nd �ss ��$ -uG -SS- _w _w 24 Unit APt ZA Jc`PP�_ e ag -- 4 nit Bdg ed9 ST .I-t} za una Apt. s ae. SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER ± 1.88 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDING WETLANDS) WITH 8" WATERMAIN (TYP.) POTENTIAL AMENITIES TO INCLUDE: TRAIL, OPEN PLAY AREA, DOG PARK, CLUBHOUSE & POOL GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP. NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.) 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE- FAMILY LOT FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) F_ 65'x 120', TYP. as I;q _SS w w w -- Z w WINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss vy 7 -- r� W I -1 1 SEW VIMH - -- - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -, - - -- - - -- - - I O O O O O O O O ° 25 22 21 I 20 I 19 11lY ' 18 1 17 I 16 I 15 / 14 / `\ 12 ` 11 I 10 I O 1 O I O 1 0 1 0 1 O I O I c): 0 I. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I / 1 1 m 7 I g I 5 1 4 1 3 1 P - s W _�5 _� 5 _ _Ss_ 5 _ _ = 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ 5s__ ss_ S 5 ,.� ° ° , ss \� s� ssssss 45' ROW -sss5 ss� N NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ ° - - - - - - - 7 ' 3s CENTRAL GREEN a4 ��''� °� 0: 0: .I g 2�J 36 �` S �, +0.65 AC `` ' ° ` 52 ; 53 i 54 i 55 i 56 i 57 i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i 6z I a7 A �; \ 27 �T '��' `` 33 �� % 51 I I EXISTING 55555 I I ,( / \ j \ I ` 38 / �R /rL 28 / z9 I ao I a1 I 32 , s0 % \� STORMWATER I WATERMAIN 0 I I I l ; `•_ / ° ° ° as / INFILTRATION BASIN I I % 0 PT I I V � �` �I ------ - - - - -- -1.90 AC I I VEGETATED /_ ORMWATER \ STORMWATER I I I BUFFER/ j 41 /�yT T 1 ` 47 ± 1.20 AC ± 1.29 AC I •�� / 42 I 43 I a4 1 15 1 O OPEN SPACE \�� / I I I ` as _ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ` / L20' RIMETER SETBACK/ \ ` - -- L - , - -� - - - - - - - - - - - -� - - � - - - VEG ATIVE Bl)FFER � SEE INSET FOR GATED ACCESS OPTION TIBBY'S DRIVE mow: wZI 3 STORY, 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (4 TOTAL BUILDING) 24' SETBACK FOR BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGHT 20' PERIMTER BUILDING SETBACK -M PORTERS NECK ROAD VEGETATED BUFFER BEHIND DUPLEXES GRAVITY SEWER MH (TYP.) PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT 11x111/"•111 AM ! ATr XAnT1 I C IM Kl OR )ENTS \ ± 5.89 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE TURNAROUND LANE FOR DRIVERS WITHOUT ACCESS RFID \ \ \ \ \ / \ I 0 200 400 600 feet GATED ACCESS OPTION PER PLANNING BOARD CONDITION Lv NOT TO SCALE N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U f�l O U O Q W W ,W F-�-1 O I r� V J nW F-'-i I--I W rn W rn (O o N In z w O U �D z H z g U) Z O c� Z ~ o0 ~ z O w J a Z O v _ z ~ ° Q o m z 0 z U O z a a_ 0 U_ W � a a Z O °w �Q z °w w W > W w x N w w cc M x U'.1 H W oc N �U W w ll� O O��h W H z_ z O w O v J U WO m0 w z � 0 N z o� 1 W p a� U U w z N s-1 o 1� 4-1� U 0� A W O W � O xW0 00 N p N N Z N I O Q U ~ ~ » z >_ 00 O LL >_ as 0 Z - U D <�� a�° W azww LLJ Z w o w Z y O U J J W Z W Z J (Z 0dLLLL] >Z> Q W J -> U f- Q w Q W DU)DDU SEAL LP-1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE 1 Gc�IMUN6'j�' Prepared by: PARAMOUNTE F N G F N E E R I N G. I N G. 122 Cinema Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 (910) 791 -6707 (0) (910) 791 -6760 (F) NC License #: C -2846 DATE: 22 January 2020 SCALE: 1 " = 1 00' At 24" x 54" NORTH t3U 4 L. l . —1 tee) `f�UNf� [ � �' f � ] i [ � I � I � ►� � I � l Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 11 - 2 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: RMF- LALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (4) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS (6) 16 -UNIT BUILDINGS (1) 12 -UNIT BUILDING ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 -008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900 -004- 009 -000, R03700- 001- 007 -000, R03700- 001 -006 -000, R02900- 004 -010 -000, R02900- 004 -010 -001, R03700- 001- 003 -000, R03700- 001 -002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE- FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI- FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU/AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SITE DATA (CONT'D) DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET MULTI - FAMILY 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SINGLE FAMILY: 10' SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: 20' OTHER DWELLINGS: 20' MINIMUM LOT SIZE: NIA MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: 45'(3 STORIES) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BED- ROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES 124 -UNIT BUILDING = 176 30 SPACES/ 16 -UNIT BUILDING = 180 22 SPACES f 12 -UNIT BUILDING= 22 PARKING PROVIDED: 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADAAND GARAGE SPACES) ADASPACES: 12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 63 SPACES 111�DMNcUN rTy 5r_1A�✓e \\n_T�r DoT 1�M l f'�f s TD f : 'f` ,1 L., Dr-,et� r-, , Y Arz_e- . SITE DATA (CONT'D) AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUBHOUSE: +1- 1100 SF PARKING REQURED: 11 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 11 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES; PKG SHARED WI APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 9.00AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED) PASSIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PAS- SIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. Conceptual Site Plan A—% Ii/9A , iw tIT_— er� -��rs rive 6 The Oaks at Murray Farm Porters Neck, North Carolina SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREETAND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNEDAND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHERAPPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PRO VIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHATARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREAAS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. SfN�L.� f;P-AMfL_y Lz7nn,, Dr -tMUN fj-y OPPOSITION MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 12 - 1 %f TM W. Inv Z Z; �_ik Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020- ITEM: 10-13- 1 7�- NEW HANOVER Co UNTY _ N'S u. PROJECT LOCATION i R ,'E F PC•BDDS PC -BDUS 1. AERIALS FROM NEW HANOVER COIIN7 . MOB W E S LEGEND - PAGES CREEK WATERSHED SAVPLE LOCATIONS �Eeel 1 inch equals 5, DOD T Receiving Waters Pages Creek SA/HQW(High Quality Waters /recreational uses) Listed on EPA 303(d) list Impaired from high levels of bacteria pathogen Enterococci = Bacteria Pathogens Prohibited shellfish harvesting area Red - Closed Pink -Cond Closed Blue -Cond Open B and of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ** SA HQW designation from NC DWR Website, 303�d) list from �1�l��ye�ksit�, shellfish info from NC DMF. Benefits in controlling or limiting impervious surfaces (Low density development) • Protection of wetlands and aquatic ecosystems • Improved water quality of receiving waterebodies • Conservation of water resources • Protection of public health • Flood control Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 3 Potential Env. Results of Increased Density • Increased impervious surface results in increased run off carrying pollutants • Increased run off carries more polluntants down gradient • Increased density will result in more wet retention ponds thereby increasing discharge of pollutants down stream. Wet detention ponds ineffective for hydrocarbon (oil, gas, tire wear), fertilizer (nitrogen phosphorous), fecal coliform (bacteria pathogens) • Increased density will drive additional wetland impacts over lower density (wetlands are natural filters present on this tract). A lower density project can avoid on -site wetland impacts. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 4 Environmental Summary • Despite water quality permitting since the early 70s within this drainage area, the resultant effect is poor water quality within Pages Creek • By allowing higher than currently zoned density the approving body is further risking Pages Creek water quality • Citizens of New Hanover seek out natural resources most notably water based recreation and by changing zoning to allow for more density the approving body places those very resources in greater jeopardy • There are no guarantees low density will not have an affect to receiving waters but logic tells you by increasing density you unnecessarily risk the very natural resources that has attracted many to this region Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 5 Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection Details I Basemap About Content Legend Contents 0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection - 2014 -2018 I Topographic Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri Report Abuse . Contact Us iota [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519 Mod Share Print I Measure Find address or place fdtal Crash Category 40 to 49 Total Crashes 47.00 Fatal_A_Injury Crashes 0.00 B_C_Injury Crashes 13.00 PDO Crashes 34.00 County NEW HANOVER Route A US 17 Aid Route B SR 1351 LRS Route 20,0d /00. �a `38 LRS Milepost e Comments �,Ziocatiold tted on map Location Error NO ERAW >r 0 0 100ft d, Fls New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, US Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 6 Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection Details I Basemap About Content Legend Contents 0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection - 2014 -2018 I Topographic Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri Report Abuse . Contact Us iolta [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519 fdtal Crash Category 50 and above Total Crashes 104.00 Fatal_A_Injury Crashes 1.00 B_C_Injury Crashes 17.00 PDO Crashes 86.00 County NEW HANOVER Route A US 17 Route B SR 1402 LRS Route 20,000,017,100.00 LRS Milepost 14.43 Mod Share Print I Measure Find address or place Comments Location mileposted - ] op'e plotted on map Location Error NO ERROR 0 -----y0 1S Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 7 A C — 'iL. New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USA Traffic Calming Assessment Vineyard Plantation New Hanover County, NC Fina� October 2019 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 8 Traffic Calming Assessment Vineyard Plantation New Hanover County, NC Prepared For: Premier Management Company P.O. Box 12051 Wilmington, NC 28405 (910) 443 -4847 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 272 N. Front Street, Suite 410 Wilmington, NC 28401 (910) 399 -5699 Project Manager: Zachary Bugg, PhD, PE Project Principal: Chris Tiesler, PE Project No. 22762 October 2019 ``1111111rrr/®s H CAR OF'ESS /p' <�2�� SE i 45 AL i .9 'tiGl NEE • ' ('j •��° cygRY.H. 'a�G �` ////1111110%\\ Ucf 31 Zb O Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 9 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary October 2019 Executive Summary 1 Findings........................................................................................................................................................ ............................... 1 Recommendations....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................................. ............................... 5 ProjectDescription ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5 ScopeOf The Report ..................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5 Data Collection and Summary ................................................................................. ..............................9 Description of Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................ .............................11 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement ..................................... .............................17 References............................................................................................................... .............................19 Board of Commissioners .7 February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10 -'Y3 - 10 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Data Collection Locations October 2019 Executive Summary 7 Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2) ............... .............................12 Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2) .............. .............................13 Figure 5. Recommended Speed Hump Placement 14 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- b - 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data October 2019 Executive Summary Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- i3 - 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment APPENDICES Appendix A Speed and Volume Data Appendix B MUTCD Speed Hump Signage and Pavement Markings Appendix C NCDOT Comments and Responses October 2019 Executive Summary I ZBoard of Commissioners 7 February 3, 2020 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. � ITEM: 10 -'13 - 13 Section 1 Executive Summary Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 14 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document summarizes vehicle speed and volume data and provides traffic calming recommendations for neighborhood roadways within the Vineyard Plantation community in New Hanover County, North Carolina, at the request of the homeowners association and Premier Management Company. The study area roadways are currently maintained by the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT)— accordingly, this study was performed per scoping discussions with NCDOT Division 3 staff and per NCDOT Division 3 Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices (Reference 1). The results of this study indicate 85th- percentile speeds on some neighborhood roadways are currently in excess of the posted speed limit and are documented along with recommendations below. FINDINGS Riesling Avenue ■ An average of 1,344 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 32 miles per hour (mph), more than 5 mph above the posted speed limit. ■ Approximately 4.4 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ An average of 412 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. ■ Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ An average of 424 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. • The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 24 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. • Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 43 - 15 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment Winery Way October 2019 Executive Summary ■ An average of 512 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. ■ Approximately 2.5 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. RECOMMENDATIONS Riesling Avenue • Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway. • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the posted speed. Winery Way ■ Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- ?3 - 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Executive Summary ■ Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- b - 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 2 Introduction Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 18 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Introduction INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Residents of the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood in New Hanover County, North Carolina have identified speeding on several neighborhood roadways that has created a potential safety and traffic noise issue. This document was prepared for the neighborhood homeowners association (HOA) and Premier Management Company in response to these concerns. Figure 1 displays the site vicinity map. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) staff visited the project area on May 8, 2018 and met with representatives from the HOA and Premier Management Company. Existing roadway widths, pavement markings, signage, parking, and traffic conditions were confirmed during this field visit. Additionally, HOA representatives identified areas with prior speeding issues and assisted with identifying locations for tube data collection (explained in more detail in the next section). Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map SCOPE OF THE REPORT The scope of this report was developed in accordance with NCDOT guidance and per discussions with NCDOT Division 3 staff at a formal scoping meeting held on August 15, 2019. Traffic speed and volume Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 9f3 - 19 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Introduction data were collected at the following locations within the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood at the direction of the HOA: • Riesling Avenue • Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way • Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive • Winery Way These roadways serve approximately 90 homes within Vineyard Plantation and are also used by residents outside Vineyard Plantation to access the homes between Jadewood Drive and Futch Creek Road. Additionally, the HOA identified Riesling Avenue as a popular shortcut between Futch Creek Road and Porters Neck Road as an alternative to the longer Champ Davis Road. The cross section of each of these roadways consists of two 10 -foot lanes with no curbs, bicycle lanes /paths, or sidewalks. The exact placement of the tube data collection locations along these roadways is displayed in Figure 2. This report is organized as follows: • Data collection and summary • Description of traffic calming measures • Recommended traffic calming measures and placement • Conclusion Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- f3 - 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. and Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment op t r OP fll. L i �Q 0A. * F 7 �- ,ri Data Collection Location KITTELSON Board of Commissioners & ASSOCIATES - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 21 October 2019 1-&_T » � 1 Data Collection Locations Figure Wilmington, NC 2 Section 3 Data Collection and Summary Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 22 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment DATA COLLECTION AND SUMMARY October 2019 Data Collection and Summary Traffic speed and volume data were collected at the study locations for the seven -day period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. Table 1 summarizes the speed and volume data, including the following elements: ■ Posted speed limit: the posted speed limit is 25 mph throughout the study area. ■ 85th- percentile speed: this is the speed at which 85 percent of vehicles travel at or below and is typically used as a rule -of -thumb for setting posted speed limits. ■ Percent of speeds above 35 mph: vehicles traveling at 10 mph or more above the posted speed limit. ■ Average daily traffic: the average number of vehicles per day over the seven -day data collection period. Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue: ■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or ■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit. As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit, while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Location Riesling Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 mph 85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds above 35 mph 32 mph 4.4 Average Daily Traffic 1,344 Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way 25 mph 29 mph <0.1 412 Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive 25 mph 24 mph 0.1 424 Winery Way 25 mph 29 mph 2.5 512 For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue: ■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or ■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit. As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit, while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 4 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 24 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES A variety of treatments were considered to reduce speeds on these roadways: • Centerline and /or edge line pavement markings • Radar speed displays • Increased speed enforcement • Speed humps • Other traffic calming devices, including street closures, neighborhood traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and center island narrowing. These treatments are described in the following sections. Much of the information on these treatments is derived from Traffic Calming: State of the Practice, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE - Reference 2). Pavement Markings Edge lines can be used to visually narrow the roadway, even if the pavement width is unchanged. Additionally, a double - yellow centerline can be used in place of a single yellow centerline to narrow the effective lane width. While lane delineation has been shown to reduce single - vehicle crashes, speed reduction results are mixed —this is because drivers are potentially as equally likely to increase their speed with the added perception of safety given by lane delineation as they are to decrease their speed because of the more narrow lane width. We recommend referring to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for all pavement marking implementation (Reference 3). Pavement markings come in a range of costs varying from $0.50 to $2.00 per linear foot, with the more durable and retroreflective markings having a higher initial cost. While pavement markings on low - volume roadways like the subject roadways typically have a longer lifespan, the need to restripe every five to ten years makes this strategy potentially more expensive than other traffic calming measures. Because of the relatively high cost and low potential to decrease speeds, this treatment is not recommended. Radar Speed Displays The use of radar speed displays or "feedback" signage is a method to remind drivers that they are speeding and encourage compliance with the posted speed limit. These displays are typically mounted on a portable trailer equipped with radar speed detection and can be rotated to different roadways within the neighborhood (Figure 3). They can also be permanently installed on sign posts. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- �b - 25 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2) Radar speed displays can be relatively inexpensive compared to other more permanent traffic calming measures, especially if the community already owns a trailer or other mounting device. While radar speed displays have been shown to decrease speeds while in place, their residual effect after being removed is negligible. The HOA should consider placing feedback signs on the study area roadways in combination with other traffic calming measures. Speed Enforcement Vineyard Plantation is under New Hanover County jurisdiction, but the size of the County and the relatively low traffic volume on the neighborhood roadways could make it challenging for public safety officials to enforce speeds on neighborhood roadways. Another option is for the HOA to take legal steps to potentially implement photo speed enforcement that would issue fines to violators. Like radar speed displays, photo speed enforcement units are typically portable to increase effectiveness and mitigate vandalism. Research has shown this strategy to be effective at reducing speeds both on enforced roadways and adjacent unenforced roadways due to the "halo" effect, whereby drivers change their behavior. Because of the high expense to deploy and operate a photo speed enforcement system, as well as the need to combat legal challenges, this strategy is usually only cost - effective on high - volume roadways where fees help offset maintenance expenses. Additionally, while the HOA could fine their own residents, it is unlikely the HOA could successfully fine visiting or "cut- through" drivers. If speeding issues on the study roadways persist, then we recommend the HOA explore the use of photo speed enforcement within the neighborhood. Speed Humps One of the most widely -used traffic calming measures, engineered speed humps are typically designed to be 12 to 14 feet in length, three to four inches in height, spaced at 300 to 600 feet apart, and comfortably negotiable at an 851h- percentile speed of 15 to 20 mph, per NCDOT guidelines Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10-'123 - 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures (Reference 1). It has become more common in practice to limit speed humps to 3.5 inches because taller speed bumps increase the probability of damage to the vehicle suspension. The 12 -foot length guarantees that a passenger vehicle cannot straddle the hump, thereby reducing the likelihood of bottoming out. The advantage of this treatment is its low cost — typically $500 to $1,000 per location — and self- enforcing design. Unlike speed bumps, which are more abrupt and are falling out of use, speed humps do not damage vehicle alignment or suspensions, nor do they cause much discomfort when negotiated at a proper speed. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has produced a recommended practice for the design of the 12 -foot speed hump (currently the only traffic calming device with a universally- accepted set of guidelines), and this is consistent with County regulations (References 3 and 4, respectively). Typically, speed humps feature a parabolic cross section (Figure 4) and are spaced 600 to 800 feet apart, depending on the area. Speed humps are more often applied as a "network- wide" measure to control speeds and less so in isolated situations. J 0.64 iM 1.75 2.22 2.64 3.W 3.31 3-58 3.75 3.89 3.97 4.00' if -- 4' Speed Hunt/ 0 156 1.07 15,3 1.94 2.31 2.63 2.89 3.11 3.28 3.40 3.48 3.50'+e 3.5' Spaed Fiume 0 0.48 0.92 131 1.67 1.% 2,25 2.46 287 281 292 298 3.00' ma X SPBW Hump Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2) One potential disadvantage of speed humps is their permanence and the expense of removal if problems arise. Another critical consideration is that speed hump placement must be sensitive to areas such as driveways, fire hydrants, utilities, and drainage systems (in particular, near intersections). Most importantly, speed humps should be designed, signed, and marked so that they do not become a safety hazard —the MUTCD contains guidance for signing and marking speed humps (Reference 3). Figure 5 shows a concept layout for the potential placement of the speed humps (with consideration to spacing, driveways, intersections, and area context) on Riesling Avenue, where the highest 85th- percentile speeds were observed'. A total of three speed humps is recommended, spaced evenly (approximately every 300 feet) along Riesling Avenue between Chablis Way and Futch Creek Road. Speed humps should be appropriately signed and marked per the MUTCD —this guidance is contained in Appendix B. Additionally, NCDOT requires speed humps be placed at least 200 feet from intersections. 1 Note that this is purely a conceptual layout and is not intended to be used for design. The placement of each speed hump should be carefully considered individually to avoid the sensitive areas mentioned above. I� Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10 -1133 - 27 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment „ Z r l / F K / aKi1 V l I el j 1 SCALE �? 0 200' 400' October 2019 - Speed Hump Ili/Fl KITTELSON Board of Commissioners N & ASSOCIATES - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 28 +'C.,:� T4°i L� is Gu W1..- Ov Recommended Speed Hump Placement New Hanover County, North Carolina Figure 5 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Other Traffic Calming Devices NCDOT Division 3 provides guidance on a number of other potential traffic calming devices, including street closures, neighborhood traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and center island narrowing. Each of these options were explored as potential solutions, but none are recommended for the study area roadways. Additional Traffic Control Devices Currently all of the intersections along the study area roadways are two -way stop controlled. While conversion to all -way stop control is not on the list of traffic calming measures suggested by ITE or NCDOT Division 3 guidelines, the HOA has requested consideration of this treatment as a method to deter cut - through traffic, including at the following intersections: ■ Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way ■ Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way ■ Winery Way /Peppermint Drive Note the MUTCD explicitly states that all -way stop signs should not be used for speed control but that it can be an applicable form of traffic control for two residential neighborhood collector streets of similar design and operating characteristics where traffic operations would be better than two -way stop control (Reference 3). From an examination of the tube count data summarized in this report, changing these intersections to all -way stop control is expected to cause minimal delays on the currently uncontrolled approaches. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 't% - 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 5 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 30 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND PLACEMENT Riesling Avenue • Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway. • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the posted speed. Winery Way • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- �73 - 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 6 References Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 13 - 32 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment REFERENCES NCDOT Division 3. Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices. 2016. 2. Ewing, R. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 1999. October 2019 References 3. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. USDOT: McLean, VA, 2009. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps and Speed Tables. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 2011. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 10- 't% - 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth and Wayne Clark, Planning and Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Text Amendment Request (TA19 -04) - Request by New Hanover County to Amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance - the Proposed Amendment Will Clarify Provisions to Reflect Current Practice and Reorganize and Consolidate the Separate Codes into a Unified Development Ordinance BRIEF SUMMARY: The proposed amendment, which consolidates five existing development codes into one unified format, is the culmination of the second phase of the county's development code update, the first phase of which was the addition of eight new zoning districts in July 2019. This phase is not intended to change the regulations that apply to properties; it is a reorganization and clarification of current practices that will provide the ordinance structure needed for the targeted code updates in phase three of the project. Hard copies of the proposed Unified Development Ordinance document are included in the Board of Commissioners agenda packets. A digital version of the document and background information can be found at https: // planning .nhcgov.com /udo /documents /. In addition to consolidating the five ordinances outlined above, the proposed Unified Development Ordinance reserves sections for the county's Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Ordinances. These codes will be added into the document through amendments later this year to incorporate the updates approved by the board in December and any changes to regulations that result from the stormwater services program. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances into one unified development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11 COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11 SCRIPT for Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances Text Amendment JAI 9-04) Request by New Hanover County to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. The proposed amendment will clarify provisions to reflect current practice and reorganize and consolidate the separate codes into a Unified Development Ordinance. I. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then any supporters and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentations and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff /Applicant presentation b. Supporters' presentation(s) (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponents' presentation(s) (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponents' rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on amendment. The motion should include a statement saying how the amendment is, or is not, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and why it is, or is not, reasonable and in the public interest. Options for Motions: • Motion to approve the text amendment as presented in the staff summary or a modified version of the text amendment; • Motion to "table" the item in order to receive more information; or • Motion to deny the amendment proposal based on specific reasons, such as the proposal is not consistent with the land use plan and /or the proposal is not reasonable and /or the proposal is not in the public interest. Staff Suggested Motion: Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances into one unified development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed amendment to New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the proposed amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 1 - 1 STAFF REPORT FOR TAI 9 -04 TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: TAI 9-04 Request: To amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. The proposed amendment will clarify provisions to reflect current practice and reorganize and consolidate the separate codes into a Unified Development Ordinance. Applicant: Subject Ordinances: New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Purpose & Intent • To reorganize the existing code into one document without changing regulations • To update provisions to reflect current practice and laws • To clarify current practices BACKGROUND This amendment, which consolidates five existing development codes into one unified format, is the result of the second phase of the "UDO Project" development code update. This unified format, a Unified Development Ordinance, is one book that contains all of a jurisdiction's locally - adopted development regulations in one place. It's organized so that all of the regulations work together and makes it easier for property owners and other users to find the information they need. Several of the jurisdictions around New Hanover County — Wilmington, Brunswick County, Pender County — have been using a unified format for many years (the most recent, Pender County's, was adopted in July 2010), and people who own and develop land in our jurisdiction are familiar with using this type of document. Reorganization Currently, the county has seven separate ordinances that regulate development within the county's planning jurisdiction (not including the NC Building Code, which is not included as part of this project). Because they are separate regulations and were adopted at different times, they do not always work together very well —for instance, they may provide different definitions for the same terms. A separate code format can also make it difficult for someone to understand what they can and cannot do with their property, as they may have to consult several documents regarding regulations and required procedures. TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 2 - 1 Page 1 of 3 The proposed reorganization of existing codes into one unified document will provide the framework needed for the targeted code updates staff will be preparing over the coming months. It will make it easier to change standards without inadvertently causing conflicts with another code or altering the use of terms. The reorganized format will also promote updates that are integrated with existing provisions so standards, such as for lighting or signs, are not repeated in multiple sections of the code. In addition to consolidating the five ordinances outlined above, the proposed Unified Development Ordinance reserves sections for the county's Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Ordinances. These codes will be added into the document through amendments later this year to incorporate the updates approved by the board in December and any changes to regulations that result from the stormwater services program discussion. The attached summary sheets indicate the current location of the provisions in each article of the proposed reorganized code document. Updates With the reorganization of the code, some updates were made to provisions that, because of their age, are no longer consistent with current practice or laws. For instance, when the Zoning Ordinance was originally adopted in 1969, the building inspector was part of the planning department and held some zoning duties. As a result, the current ordinance still indicates that the building inspector enforces zoning rules, a role that is now the responsibility of the zoning compliance officials. The attached summary sheets highlight updates to current provisions. Clarifications Clarifications of current practices are also included in the reorganized code document. Existing provisions do not always clearly articulate how a provision has historically been interpreted. For instance, when the Zoning Ordinance was originally written, the business model for an "Automobile Service Station" included repairs, fuel sales, and towing operations. Over the past fifty years, however, this type of use has evolved, with fuel sales now common in conjunction with grocery stores, for instance. So the proposed amendment, separates these uses out to make permissions more apparent to code users. The attached summary sheets identify where clarifications have been made. PROPOSED AMENDMENT The proposed reorganized document is available at https: / /planning.nhcgov.com /udo /documents /. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this request at their December 5, 2019 meeting. The Board recommended approval of the Unified Development Ordinance draft submitted for your review. The Board recommended approval (5 -0), finding the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. The Board also found APPROVAL of the proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users. TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9 Page 2 of 3 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 2 - 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances into one unified development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users. TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 2 - 3 Page 3 of 3 Article 1: General Provisions SUMMARY: This article sets out the general legal provisions for the development code, such as outlining the county's planning jurisdiction, referencing its authorities to regulate development, and covering required legal language, like a severability clause. Updates & Clarifications • New sections outlining the relationship of this ordinance with the Comprehensive Plan (Section 1.5) and provisions for the transition between the old development codes and the ordinance (Section 1.7) have been added. • The current development codes do not include some of the legal provisions that are generally included in a development code. As a result, new language has been added regarding the general purpose and intent of the ordinance (Section 1.3) and the authority to make technical corrections (Section 1.9). • Some sections have been updated to reflect current practice or requirements of law that may differ from what was in place when the codes were originally adopted. o One statement of general authority is included, as currently each development - related code has its own reference to a legal authority. (Section 1.2: Authority) o Language clarifying that bona fide farm exemptions do not apply to flood ordinance requirements and reflecting the state's subdivision exemptions for court - ordered subdivisions is included. (Section 1.4: Applicability and Jurisdiction) o Language currently in Section 65 of the Subdivision Ordinance has been updated to clarify that the county does not have the authority per state law to enforce private agreements, restrictive covenants, or deed restrictions. (Section 1.6: Relationship with Other Laws) Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Article 1, Section 10: Authority • Article 1, Section 11: Jurisdiction • Article 1, Section 12: Title • Article 3, Section 32: Application of District Regulations Subdivision Ordinance • Article 1, Section 10: Authority • Article 1, Section 12: Jurisdiction Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park Ordinance • Section I: Authority • Section II: Jurisdiction • Section III: Title Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11-3- 1 Article 2: Measurements and Definitions SUMMARY: This article outlines the way dimensional standards, such as setback and height, are measured; outlines the rules that should be used for interpreting provisions of the ordinance, such as the difference between words like "shall" and "may "; and defines the terms used in the code. Updates & Clarifications • This article has been reorganized to separate measurements from the definitions of other terms. • Definitions not currently located in the definitions section in the current Zoning Ordinance have been moved to this article. • The definitions for terms have been updated to include: o Clarifying the difference between the way the terms "yard" and "setback" are used, o Providing a definition for each use included on the Table of Permitted Uses, o Moving portions of definitions that include regulatory language (e.g., the requirements home occupations must follow) to the use standards in Article 4, o Updating the definition of site specific development plans to clarify that performance residential developments, major and minor site plans, and master planned developments are included and are eligible for vesting, and o Reorganizing how the words are listed (i.e., separately as opposed to grouped under a heading) to make them easier to find. Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Article 2, Definitions • Section 54.1: Exceptional Design Zoning District (EDZD) • Section 54.3: RFMU, Riverfront Mixed Use District • Section 55.1: COD Conservation Overlay District Subdivision Ordinance • Article II: Definitions and Interpretations Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park Ordinance • Section IV: Definitions Airport Height Restriction Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 2 • Article II: Definitions and Interpretations Article 3: Zoning Districts SUMMARY: This article outlines how the Official Zoning Map works, how district boundaries are interpreted, and lists the purpose and standards for each zoning district. Updates & Clarifications • Language is included to clarify that water bodies are zoned based on the zoning of the adjacent land. (Section 3.1.1.C: Rules for Interpretation of District Boundaries) • Provisions allowing for a digital Official Zoning Map have been added. (Section 3.1.1: Official Zoning Map) • Intent statements for each category of zoning district (residential, commercial, etc.) are included. • Individual zoning districts' purpose statements and district names have been updated. • Photographs of typical development and graphics depicting dimensional standards have been added for each district. • Street side setback standards currently located in the definition for "Lot Frontage" have been added to each district's table of dimensional standards. • Open space requirements for the new RMF districts have been clarified. • The district specific standards for EDZD and RFMU have been reorganized so provisions are easier to find and understand. • The procedure for approving Shopping Center districts is clarified. • The current Conservation Overlay District requires environmental resource protection standards based on a map that has not been updated in over two decades. To clarify how these provisions apply to particular properties, the conservation standards have been moved to Article 5: General Development Standards and will no longer be treated as a zoning overlay. The standards will apply whenever the natural resource is present on a property. • Standards currently listed as general development standards in the Zoning Ordinance that apply to zoning districts rather than uses listed on the Table of Permitted Uses (such as the number of inoperative vehicles allowed on a residential lot) have been moved to this article. • The term "High Density Development" has been changed to "Additional Dwelling Allowance" to more accurately reflect the intent of this provision. The current term can be misleading, as it only results in low to moderate density developments in four of the five districts where allowed. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 3 Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Article II, Section 23: Definitions • Article V, District Regulations • Section 63: Additional Restrictions Imposed on Uses Permitted by Right Article 4: Uses and Use - Specific Standards SUMMARY: This article includes the tables that show which uses are allowed in each zoning district and the standards that apply to individual uses, such as size limits or additional buffers. Updates & Clarifications • Currently, the zoning ordinance only includes one table of permitted uses, but some uses are treated differently depending on whether they are permanent, temporary, or accessory to a principal use. To make sure these differences are clear, this article contains three different tables of permitted uses: one for primary uses, one for accessory uses, and one for temporary uses. • Recent court decisions have been made specifying that uses not specifically listed in an ordinance cannot be prohibited. As a result, new language has been included that outlines how new uses will be interpreted based on new use classifications and clear interpretation criteria. • Use terms have been updated to o Reflect modern usage (e.g. Bar /Nightclub instead of Cabaret, Disco); o Clarify historic interpretations (e.g., Automobile Service Station includes Car Wash and Fuel Sales); and o Merge some use terms that do not need to be separated (e.g., General Building Contractor, General Contractors Other Than Building, Landscaping Contractors, and Special Trade Contractors). Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Article II, Section 23: Definitions • Article V, Section 50: Establishment of Use District • Article VI, Section 63: Additional Restrictions Imposed on Uses Permitted by Right • Article VII, Section 72: Additional Restrictions Imposed on Certain Special Uses Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park Ordinance • Section IV: Definitions • Section VII: Specifications for Mobile Home Parks • Section VIII: Travel Trailer Park Specifications • Section IX: Registration Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 4 Article 5: General Development Standards SUMMARY: This article includes general standards for new development, such as lighting, parking, and landscaping requirements. It also includes provisions regarding tree retention, protections for conservation resources, and sign regulations. Updates & Clarifications • The current Conservation Overlay District requires environmental resource protection standards based on a map that has not been updated in over two decades. To clarify how these provisions apply to particular properties, the conservation standards have been moved to Article 5: General Development Standards and will no longer be treated as a zoning overlay. The standards will apply whenever the natural resource is present on a property. • Standards for parking, tree retention, and landscaping have been reorganized so information is easier to find and to clarify current regulations and historic interpretations. Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Section 55.1: COD Conservation Overlay District • Article VI, Supplementary District Regulations • Section 60: Development Plans • Section 61: Traffic • Section 62: Landscaping • Article VIII: Off - Street Parking and Loading • Article IX: Design Standards for Signs Airport Height Restriction Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 5 Article 6: Subdivision Design and Improvements SUMMARY: This article outlines all provisions for the subdivision of property, including subdivision design standards, the difference between minor subdivisions and major subdivisions, and improvements required as part of the subdivision process (e.g., open space, fire hydrants, and street lights). It also sets out requirements for the establishment of Property Owners' Associations. Updates & Clarifications • References to regulatory bodies, other county codes, and legal authorities have been updated. Current Location of Code Provisions Subdivision Ordinance • Article I, Section 15: Purpose • Article IV, Design Standards • Article V, Improvements Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 6 Article 1: Stormwater Management SUMMARY: This article outlines when stormwater permits and review are required and includes regulations regarding connections Ito stormwater systems. Updates & Clarifications • This section will remain reserved until the updates anticipated to be included in the stormwater services program process are complete. • All development - related provisions in the Stormwater Ordinance (as updated) will be included in this article, except definitions, procedures, and design standards, which will be included in other sections of the code or in administrative manuals. Current Location of Code Provisions Stormwater Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 7 Article 8: Erosion and Sedimentation Control SUMMARY: This article includes the county's requirements for erosion and sedimentation control during development, including permits, erosion and sedimentation control plans, and penalties. Updates & Clarifications • This section will remain reserved at this time. The county is authorized to conduct its erosion and sedimentation control program by the state, and some updates were considered recently by the Board of Commissioners. The entire Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance will be added to this location in the reorganized document as part of an upcoming administrative amendment. • All provisions of the current Erosion & Sedimentation Control Ordinance will be included in this article to comply with state requirements. Current Location of Code Provisions Erosion & Sedimentation Control Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 8 Article 9: Flood Damage Prevention SUMMARY: This article includes the provisions for the county's flood damage prevention ordinance, which is required for residents to be eligible for federal flood insurance. It outlines development requirements for structures and development activity in each FEMA designated flood zone, along with definitions, the duties of the floodplain administrator, the permitting process, and corrective procedures. Updates & Clarifications • Section headings are updated for consistency with the rest of the Unified Development Ordinance document. • All provisions in the current Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance will be included in this article to comply with state requirements. Current Location of Code Provisions Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 9 Article 10: Administrative Procedures SUMMARY: This article outlines the county's advisory and decision - making bodies and the review procedures for each type of decision or permit authorized by the development code (e.g., zoning compliance approvals, variances, special use permits). Updates & Clarifications • Currently, review procedures are outlined in multiple places in the Zoning Ordinance and other development codes, which makes it difficult to understand and communicate the process for reviewing applications. This article compiles and standardizes current provisions. • Standardizing procedures will affect some current provisions, including requiring only one community meeting for EDZD projects, which is the current practice for RFMU, UMXZ, and PD projects. • Procedures are established for processing and reviewing major and minor site plans, which is a result of the process - improvement efforts reflected in the county's COAST permitting platform. • Public hearing and community meeting notifications are aligned with the requirements outlined in the state statutes, which only require notification of property owners. • Approval authorities have been updated to reflect organizational changes and current state statutes: • Provisions for building permits are covered by the state building code and have been removed from this ordinance; • The Planning Director (or his designee) is established as the primary authority for planning department - related portions of the ordinance; and • The Zoning Board of Adjustment is now referred to as simply the Board of Adjustment. • Procedures have been updated to reflect current practices, including: • Specifying the role of zoning compliance review within the building permit process, • Updating the organizations that are represented on the Technical Review Committee (TRC) and clarifying its administrative function, and • Outlining the TRC's role in the review of site plans and construction drawings. Board of Commissioners - Febr ITEM: 11- 3 - 10 Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Section 54.1: Exceptional Design Zoning District (EDZD) • Section 54.2: Planned Development (PD) District • Section 54.3: RFMU, Riverfront Mixed Use District • Section 54.4: Urban Mixed Use Zoning (UMXZ) District • Section 55.2: CUD Conditional Use District • Section 55.3: CZD Conditional Zoning District • Section 61.4: Traffic Impact Analysis • Section 63.11: Group Homes • Article VII, Provisions for Uses Allowed as Special Uses • Section 109: Vesting Rights and Development Agreements • Article X, Administration and Enforcement • Article XI, Amendments • Article XII, Board of Adjustment • Article XIII, Legal Provisions Subdivision Ordinance • Article III, Plat Preparation and Approval Procedure • Article VI: Administration Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park Ordinance • Section V: Plan Preparation and Approval Procedures • Section VI: Issuance of Construction Permits and Certificate of Occupancy • Section X: Amendments Airport Height Restriction Ordinance • Section VIII: Permits • Section X: Board of Adjustment • Section XI: Judicial Review Article 11: Nonconforming Situations SUMMARY: This article outlines how development standards relate to structures and uses that no longer comply with current regulations, such as lots that do not meet minimum lot requirements and uses that are no longer allowed in a particular zoning district. Its provisions include whether nonconforming situations can be modified and when they must come into compliance with new standards. Updates & Clarifications • Currently, the Zoning Ordinance includes effective dates for multiple individual standards throughout the code. These dates are used to help staff determine whether a situation is considered legally nonconforming. New language references "the ordinance as amended" instead of listing each individual effective date, relying on administrative records regarding ordinance changes to streamline the code. • Provisions for the expansion on nonconforming industrial uses have been moved from the industrial zoning district standards to this section. Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Article IV, Non - Conforming Situations • Section 53.2: I -1 Light Industrial District • Section 53.3: I -2 Heavy Industrial District Airport Height Restriction Ordinance Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11-3- 11 • Section VII: Nonconforming Uses Article 12: Violations and Enforcement SUMMARY: This article includes the procedures staff use when a violation of the ordinance occurs and outlines the penalties that they are authorized to impose. Updates & Clarifications • Because the county building inspector was part of the planning department when the ordinance was first adopted, current ordinances still list that position as being responsible for some enforcement actions. This article clarifies these authorities should belong to the Planning Director or his /her designee. • Enforcement procedures and penalties for the Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance now follow the same requirements as included in the Zoning Ordinance, which will increase civil penalties from $50 per day to $100 per day. Current links between Zoning Ordinance standards and provisions for mobile home and travel trailer parks would already result in zoning enforcement proceedings, so there should be little practical impact. Current Location of Code Provisions Zoning Ordinance • Section 100: Administration and Enforcement • Section 131: Complaints Regarding Violations • Section 132: Enforcement of Ordinance Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance • Subsection 11.2: Complaints Regarding Violations • Subsection 11.3: Enforcement of Ordinance Airport Height Restriction Ordinance • Section IX: Enforcement • Section XII: Penalties Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 11- 3 - 12 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Additional Items DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution to Honor the Service and Sacrifice of Antonio I. "Tony" Moore BRIEF SUMMARY. Antonio I. "Tony" Moore, from Wilmington, NC, lost his life in service to our country on Friday, January 24, 2020, while deployed in Syria. A resolution has been prepared to honor his service and sacrifice, and to extend sincere sympathy to his family and friends. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the resolution. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 12 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION TO HONOR THE SERVICE AND SACRIFICE OF ANTONIO I "TONY" MOORE WHEREAS, Antonio I. "Tony" Moore, from Wilmington, North Carolina, enlisted in the United States Army after graduating from J.T. Hoggard High School, where he played football and was known to teammates and friends for his "contagious smile;" and WHEREAS, Army Specialist Moore was in the 363rd Engineer Battalion, 411th Engineer Brigade, his awards and decorations including the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service Ribbon; and WHEREAS, at the age of 22, Army Specialist Moore lost his life in service to our country on Friday, January 24, while deployed to Syria; and WHEREAS, Army Specialist Moore served his county bravely and honorably, and as a community we mourn the loss of our friend, colleague, student, teammate, brother and son; and WHEREAS, we invite all to give thanks and honor the Moore family and all Gold Star families in our community at the Gold Star Families Memorial Monument in Hugh MacRae Park, and that we never forget the sacrifice our service men and women, and their families make. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners recognizes and honors the service and ultimate sacrifice of Antonio I. "Tony" Moore to his country and community, and we lift his parents, brothers, sister, grandparents, extended family, and all who knew and loved him in our thoughts during this difficult time and always. Further, let it be resolved that, in accordance with North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper's order, flags in New Hanover County and across the state, will remain at half -staff until sunset on Tuesday, February 4, as a symbol of our gratitude and deepest sympathy. ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 12- 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Additional Items DEPARTMENT: County PRESENTER(S): Mary Williams- Stover, Executive Director, NC Council for Women & Manager Youth Involvement, NC Department of Administration CONTACT(S): Tufanna L. Bradley, Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Presentation of Letter from Governor Roy Cooper Thanking New Hanover County for Re- establishing the New Hanover County Commission for Women BRIEF SUMMARY: On August 12, 2019, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners adopted the bylaws of a re- established New Hanover County Commission for Women which was championed by Judge Robin Robinson and Mary Williams- Stover of the North Carolina Council for Women & Youth Involvement. At the October 21, 2019 New Hanover County Board of Commissioners meeting, five community members were appointed to serve on the New Hanover County Commission for Women. The remaining membership of the Commission for Women includes a YWCA designee and five members, who will be appointed by the City of Wilmington. Ms. Mary Williams- Stover intends to thank the board for re- establishing the commission and extending a letter to the board from Governor Roy Cooper. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Hear presentation and receive letter. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Hear presentation and receive letter. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Heard presentation and receiveed letter. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 13 Roy Cooper Governor Office of the governor State of Worths Carotina ��z s'rarF 4�i� February 3, 2020 The Hon. Julia Olson- Boseman, Chair New Hanover County Commissioners 230 Government Center Dr., Suite 175 Wilmington, N. C. 28403 Dear Julia: 20301 _MaiBervtce Center Tcateigh, X.C. 276,99 -0301 I am grateful to you and the New Hanover County Commissioners for re- establishing the New Hanover County Commission for Women. This is a valuable resource and voice for women in your county. I look forward to hearing from you about the work the Commission will be doing to help make North Carolina healthier, better educated and providing the opportunity to live a more abundant and purposeful life. Please do not hesitate to contact my office if we can be of assistance to you in the future. With kind regards, I am Very truly yours, Roy Cooper �r RAC /sm , pool— J Location; 7te State Cayitol 13uifding, Rafeigh, _XC. 27602 Board of Ctb'I wNss uge8s1- FmIsruary 3, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020 Additional Items DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Wave Interlocal Agreement Amendment 2 BRIEF SUMMARY: On Friday, January 31, 2020, the City of Wilmington published its agenda for the council meeting Tuesday, February 4 including an item that extends a loan to Wave in the amount of $400,000 and appoints a Wave board of 7 persons: the city and county manager, the city and county finance officers, and the executive director of the MPO. It also calls for a meeting of the board Monday, February 10 at 12 p.m. To take effect, the county would need to consider a similar action agreeing to a loan of $300,000 for Wave and to the appointments. An amendment to the existing interlocal agreement between the city and the county is attached for board consideration. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the amendment as drafted. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Approve the amendment as drafted conditioned on the city taking identical action(s) at its meeting February 4. If the council does not adopt the amendment, then the record should reflect the county's action is null and void. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved with the addition of a representative from the city and the county 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 ITEM: 14 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT #2 THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT ( #2) is made and entered into this the 4"' day of February, 2020 by and between the CITY OF WILMINGTON, a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina (hereinafter, "City "), and NEW HANOVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina (hereinafter, "County "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on April 7, 2004, and subsequently amended on March 2, 2015, the County and City entered into that certain Interlocal Agreement known as the ` Interlocal Agreement Between New Hanover County and the City of Wilmington to Create a Public Transportation Authority and to Jointly Fund and Support the Authority' (hereinafter "Agreement "); WHEREAS, Paragraph 16 of the Agreement authorizes the County and City to amend or modify the Agreement; WHEREAS, on January 21, 2020, the parties hereto adopted a concurrent resolution for enhanced public transportation; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend this Agreement to include certain revised terms regarding the respective rights and obligations of the County and the City to further implement the referenced concurrent resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed upon by the parties, the parties agree as follows: 1. Section 3, Authority position, shall be and is revised such that the existing Authority Board comprised of eleven (11) members is dissolved and replaced as set forth in the new Section 3 that shall henceforth read as follows: "3. Authority Composition. The Authority governing board shall consist of seven (7) members (or each member's designee). The members shall be the New Hanover County Manager, the City of Wilmington Manager, the City of Wilmington Attorney, a New Hanover County Deputy Attorney, the City of Wilmington Finance Director, the New Hanover County Finance Director, and the Executive Director of the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. The New Hanover County Manager Page 1 of 4 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 RI-3 ITEM: 14 1 - 1 shall be the Chair and the Wilmington City Manager shall be the Vice -Chair in even - numbered years. The Wilmington City Manager shall be the Chair and the New Hanover County Manager shall be the Vice -Chair in odd - numbered years. The board shall hold a Special Meeting on February 10th at noon at Forden Station, 505 Cando Street in Wilmington to organize and address issues related to board transition and maintaining WAVE transit services. Appropriate and timely public notice of this Special Meeting shall be published by WAVE staff. The Authority board shall appoint a Secretary who need not be a member of the Authority board." 2. Section 4, Financing and Budgeting, ting, shall and is revised to include the following addition which shall be placed in series following Section 4 (c): "(d) Upon execution of this agreement, the City shall loan the Authority a sum of four hundred thousand ($400,000.00) dollars, without any interest, due and payable on or before June 30, 2020. Should said debt not be repaid by said date, the City may withhold any balance due from any City 2021 fiscal year appropriation to the Authority. Upon execution of this agreement, the County shall loan the Authority a sum of three hundred thousand ($300,000.00) dollars, without any interest, due and payable on or before June 30, 2020. Should said debt not be repaid by said date, the County may withhold any balance due from any County 2021 fiscal year appropriation to the Authority. 3. Ongoing Effect. Except as specifically above amended, the original Interlocal Agreement, with prior Amendment, shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed by their duly authorized officials, the day and year first written above. Page 2 of 4 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 R14 ITEM: 14 1 - 2 CITY OF WILMINGTON Bill Saffo, Mayor ATTEST: Penelope Spicer - Sidbury, City Clerk [SEAL] Approved as to form: City Attorney STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER I, _ , a Notary Public of County, North Carolina, certify that Penelope Spicer - Sidbury personally came before me this day and acknowledged that she is City Clerk of the City of Wilmington, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the Council, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Mayor, sealed with its corporate seal and attested by herself as its City Clerk. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of , 2020. Notary Public My commission expires: CERTIFICATION This instrument has been pre- audited in the manner required by The Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. This day of 12020. Page 3 of 4 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 RI -5 ITEM: 14 1 - 3 City Finance Officer Page Intentionally Blank New Hanover County Digital Signature Page Attached Hereto And Incorporated Herein by Reference Page 4 of 4 Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 R1 -6 ITEM: 14- 1 - 4