HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 2020 02-03NEW HANOVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC 28401
Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair I Patricia Kusek, Vice -Chair
junathan Barfield, Jr. , Commissioner I Woody White, Commissioner I Rob Zapple, Commissioner
Chris Coudriet, County Manager I Wanda Copley, County Attorney I Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board
FEBRUARY 3, 2020 4:00 PM
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Julia Olson - Boseman)
INVOCATION (Reverend Wes Hunter, Masonboro Baptist Church)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Vice -Chair Patricia Kusek)
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1. Approval of Minutes
2. Award of Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Audit Contract
3. Adoption of Children's Dental Health Month Proclamation
4. Adoption of Heart Health Awareness Month Proclamation
5. Approval of Four Donations for Accession into the Museum's Permanent
Collection
6. Approval of Four Items to be Deaccessioned from the Museum's Permanent
Collection
7. Approval of December 2019 Tax Collection Reports
8. Approval of Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real
Property
ESTI MATED
MINUTES REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
10 9. Cape Fear Public Utility Authority Annual Report
40 10. Public Hearing NOTE: Applicant has Requested a Continuance
Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, I nc. on Behalf of the
Property Owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39
Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market Street and the
8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD)
RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to
Construct a Residential Development Consisting of Multi- Family, Duplex, and
Single - Family Housing
40 11. Public Hearing
Text Amendment Request (TA19 -04) - Request by New Hanover County to
Amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel
Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Damage Prevention Ordinance -the Proposed Amendment Will Clarify
Provisions to Reflect Current Practice and Reorganize and Consolidate the
Separate Codes into a Unified Development Ordinance
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes)
ESTI MATED
MINUTES ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS
5 12. Consideration of a Resolution to Honor the Service and Sacrifice of Antonio 1.
"Tony" Moore
5 13. Presentation of Letter from Governor Roy Cooper Thanking New Hanover
County for Re- establishing the New Hanover County Commission for Women
15 14. Consideration of Wave I nterlocal Agreement Amendment 2
15. Additional Items
County Manager
County Commissioners
Clerk to the Board
County Attorney
16. ADJOURN
Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move
forward until the agenda is completed.
Mission
New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior
service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal
management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow.
Vision
A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community,
committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come.
Core Values
Integrity - Accountability - Professionalism - Innovation - Stewardship
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board
CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell
SUBJECT:
Approval of Minutes
BRIEF SUMMARY.
Approve minutes from the following meeting:
Regular Meeting held on January 21, 2020
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve minutes.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer
CONTACT(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher and Martha Wayne, Deputy Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:
Award of Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Audit Contract
BRIEF SUMMARY:
At the February 2, 2015 meeting, after a request for proposal process had been completed, the Commissioners
adopted a resolution awarding the audit services contract to Cherry Bekaert LLP for fiscal year 2014 -2015 with the
option to renew the contract for each of the following four fiscal years based upon satisfactory performance each
year. Each of these renewals have been utilized by the County. A one -year extension is being requested to authorize
Cherry Bekaert LLP to complete the audit for an amount of $80,350 for fiscal year ending 2019 -2020. An additional
$3,750 will be charged per program if more than seven single audit programs are required to be audited. The County
intends to issue a request for proposal for the 2020 -2021 fiscal year end audit services contract.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the one -year extension to award the audit services contract to Cherry Bekaert LLP for fiscal year 2019 -2020.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Phillip Tarte, Health Director
CONTACT(S): Kathy Stoute, Assistant County Manager
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Children's Dental Health Month Proclamation
BRIEF SUMMARY.
Health and Human Services has submitted a proclamation to recognize February as Children's Dental Health Month in
New Hanover County.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the proclamation.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 3
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the future is, to a large measure, dependent on the good health of our families; and
WHEREAS, good health can be achieved in part through good dental habits learned early and reinforced
throughout life; and
WHEREAS, dental cavities are the most common chronic disease found in children; and
WHEREAS, good oral health habits start in childhood; and
WHEREAS, brushing twice daily using toothpaste with fluoride, flossing daily, having routine check -ups,
and eating a diet low in sugary foods and drinks help prevent tooth decay; and
WHEREAS, an oral health literate and educated public is more empowered to embrace healthy oral
hygiene and dietary behaviors and to make and keep dental appointments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that
February 2020 will be recognized as "Children's Dental Health Month" in New Hanover County.
ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair
ATTEST:
Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Phillip Tarte, Health Director
CONTACT(S): Kathy Stoute, Assistant County Manager
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Heart Health Awareness Month Proclamation
BRIEF SUMMARY.
Health and Human Services has submitted a proclamation to recognize February as Heart Health Awareness Month in
New Hanover County.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the proclamation.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 4
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
HEART HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, the annual celebration of Heart Health Awareness Month began in 1963 to encourage all
Americans to join the battle against heart and cardiovascular disease; and
WHEREAS, protecting heart health encompasses all cardiovascular health including risk for strokes and
other cardiovascular conditions; and
WHEREAS, one in three adult women has some form of cardiovascular disease and heart disease is
responsible for one in five adult deaths; and
WHEREAS, nearly one in six adults with high blood pressure do not know that they have this risk factor
for heart and cardiovascular disease; and
WHEREAS, 80% of strokes can be prevented by adopting healthy habits; and
WHEREAS, February is also the American Heart Association's Go Red for Women campaign because
heart disease impacts women's lives as much as it impacts men's lives; and
WHEREAS, National Wear Red Day for 2020 will be celebrated on February 7, 2020; and
WHEREAS, New Hanover County Health and Human Services is committed to reducing the risks and
detrimental effects of heart and cardiovascular disease for all our residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that
February 2020 will be recognized as "Heart Health Awareness Month" in New Hanover County.
ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair
ATTEST:
Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Museum PRESENTER(S): Heather Yenco, Museum Curator
CONTACT(S): Heather Yenco
SUBJECT:
Approval of Four Donations for Accession into the Museum's Permanent Collection
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The Museum collects objects pertaining to the history, science, and cultures of the Lower Cape Fear region. Submitted
for approval are for donations to be added to the Museum's permanent collection. Donations are carefully
documented. The Curator reviews each item's provenance, condition, relevance to the collection, potential for
exhibition, and room required for storage. A report on each object is reviewed carefully by the Director and
Collection's Committee. The objects presented have passed this scrutiny and were approved at the Museum Advisory
Board meeting on January 15, 2020.
Child's costume, 1930s
Marionette, 1950s
Movie set IDs, parking passes, and photographs, 1990s
Letters regarding an escaped slave, 1850
Each item offered has a special story to preserve and they help to document 300 years of the region's history.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Accept four donations of regional artifacts into the Cape Fear Museum's Permanent Collection.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 5
NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting
OBJ. DATE
OBJECTS
PROVENANCE / MISSION
1932
- costume
This costume was worn by a 1St grader at Tileston Elementary School.
1950s
- marionette doll
This marionette doll was used by a local child.
P�
1
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1
NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting
1980s -2000s - 4 ID badges
-4 parking passes
-2 photographs
These badges and passes were used by R. Collins while working as a carpenter on various movie sets. He is
photographed with the crew of The Crow. (Props constructed by Collins were approved for acquisition
12/16/2019.)
i
l b "S. II1a� I CAI(0LCO STUDIOS INC.
RONNIECOLLINS COLLINS, RONALD
CARPENTER CARPENTE
C R �T
MERRIMACK VALLEY FILMS
RA I
"RADIGLAND MURDERS" 1
LULDA PRWI6T— RAD 075
jjBADGE MUST BE DIIPLATE llAWTCNMF OE DISITATED
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY wIICN N ZIND FACT -D,
= e
S3 CR E E M G EM S
MUST BE DISPLAY
E
D
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY
PARKING
PERMIT
C06.6.%
S-000
00
frLR*EE NC ESMS
MUST BE DISPLAYED
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY
PARKING
PERMIT
61IMS
I : ".0"N'
tjr. 4 4
SCR, ENNE/f I
s T � .spy
MUST BE DISPLAYED
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY
PARKING
PERMIT
105
� 9 IIc)ay
5 C'RE EN GEfMS
o
MUST BE DISPLAYED
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY
PARKING
PERMIT,
ins
2
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 2
WWr- 159
RONALD COLLINS
PREP MAKER
WHEN VE MERE CULDRED
WIMP R .E ENFERTAIXHENT
1111113E M115T BE DISPLAYED
WHEN ENTERING FACILITY
NHC Commissioners Acquisition Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting
1849 -1850 -2 letters These letters were written to W. Bettencourt of Wilmington, one from the mayor of Norfolk and the other from an
enslaved person named George. They document George's failed attempt to escape enslavement.
3
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 3
4- -Z -
� ry.t•
ftrF3.,,.: Wiz: -: 8., 6...< d.�,?'..�
/.gp�.1•dJ..,
�Q � �..s..- %ry4Y.� .✓�..Yac[z /�.S. t._O�'_N. aT /C'—i �°�9
� _
�m[U'�ibi .O.wC�Lrif fry pCss �,'v...0 f y ✓�
X �
�.
� - .i�s�✓t�. Vii} <.,e.. J�as.�L7w.a r-Sy� .-� t .1L?
�
,( w..w•e.� - rte/ ✓�G �
I
--zz.2
s%_e,
A-/f�- >t °GeZ,'.�
a'�..Z —e 5 .psi IT.Pe .., �eL „: w..+•v fs�s- �- /NF+ns.e-
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Museum PRESENTER(S): Heather Yenco, Museum Curator
CONTACT(S): Heather Yenco
SUBJECT:
Approval of Four Items to be Deaccessioned from the Museum's Permanent Collection
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Museum staff and the Museum Advisory Board have been diligently culling items from the permanent collection that
have no relevant provenance, are in very poor condition, or are duplicates of better examples. This process is a
recommended step in effective collections management. The items recommended for deaccession have all been
reviewed by the Curator, Director, Collections Committee, and the Museum Advisory Board at their meeting on
January 15, 2020.
Recommendations for disposition are also provided. Items identified for destruction are because they are in such poor
and deteriorating condition they have no value. Most items are identified for public auction, a procedure which
removes the sale from immediate conflict of interest with the Museum. Income earned from items sold at auction
goes into a restricted account used to purchase new artifacts for the collection or to conserve objects already in the
collection. An object may also be recommended for transfer to another collecting institution.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Accept the recommendation of the Museum Advisory Board to deaccession four items identified on the attached list
for deaccession from the Museum's Permanent Collection.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 6
NHC Commissioners Deaccession Proposals February 3, 2020 Board Meeting
ACC. #
OBJECT, DATE, DONOR, ISSUE
RECOMMEND
1990.8.1
Packs of peanuts, 1989; John R. Jeffries
Destruction
1990.8.4
These packs of peanuts are in poor condition. The peanuts, which are not removedu
sweee'N'Souon
from the packs, are coated in sugar and corn syrup, which is now discoloring the
packaging. These items pose a risk in attracting pests.
a rS"'
1991.127.2
Phonograph with built —in radio, about 1940; Sarah Dickinson
Public auction
This phonograph has parts attached to it that are not original to the object. It would
not be exhibited in such condition. The museum has other phonographs in the
s
collection that are better suited for exhibition.
1997.1.46
Atomizer, about 1935; found in storage
Public auction
This atomizer was found in collections storage, with no known provenance or paper
trail. The museum has other atomizers in the collection with known provenance.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 6 - 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Trina Lewis, Collections Supervisor
CONTACT(S): Trina Lewis
SUBJECT:
Approval of December 2019 Tax Collection Reports
BRIEF SUMMARY:
NCGS 105 -350 requires the Tax Collector to submit a report showing the amount of taxes collected.
Overall Collection Percentages for December 2019 are ahead of collections for December 2018 for New Hanover
County and Debt Service. Fire District overall collection percentage is trending slightly behind in comparison from
December 2018 to December 2019.
The report for December 2019 in comparison to December 2018 is as follows:
New Hanover County
December 2019
December 2018
Real Property
80.52%
79.77%
Personal Property
51.83%
45.10%
Motor Vehicle
100.00%
100.00%
Overall Collection Rate
78.69%
77.44%
Total Collected YTD
$131,478,467.35
$127,017,927.73
New Hanover County
Debt Service
December 2019
December 2018
Real Property
80.32%
79.11%
Personal Property
51.73%
45.31%
Motor Vehicle
100.00%
100.00%
Overall Collection Rate
78.51%
76.93%
Total Collected YTD
$17,291,416.95
$16,602,584.15
Grand Total Collected YTD
$148,769,884.30
$143,620,511.88
New Hanover County Fire
District
December 2019
December 2018
Real Property
84.22%
83.27%
Personal Property
54.39%
58.79%
Motor Vehicle
100.00%
100.00%
Overall Collection Rate
81.39%
81.60%
Total Collected YTD
$8,506,463.32
$8,123,439.49
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the reports.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7
New Hanover County Monthly Collection Report for December 2019
Current Year 2019 -2020
Scroll /Billed
Abatements
Adjustments
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
$ 146,571,779.81
$ (46,191.94)
$ 10,162.95
$ 14,525,659.17
$ (168,368.56)
$ 285,608.60
$ 5,841,729.32
$
$
$
166,939,168.30
(214,560.50)
295,771.55
Total Taxes Charged
Collections to Date
*Refunds
Write -off
$
$
$
$
146,535,750.82
118,196,429.07
199,012.43
(186.91)
$
$
$
$
14,642,899.21
7,592,816.40
4,633.75
(1,152.95)
$
$
5,841,729.32
5,841,729.32
$
$
$
$
167,020,379.35
131,630,974.79
203,646.18
(1,339.86)
Outstanding Balance
$
28,538,147.27
$
7,053,563.61
$
-
$
35,591,710.88
Collection Percentage
80.52
926.74
51.83
$
100.00
$
78.69
YTD Interest Collected
$
2,244.91
$
-
$
48,893.83
$
51,138.74
$
1,968.03
$
431,504.49
*Refunds
$
22,505.24
$
7,585.15
Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD
131,478,467.35
Prior Years 2009 -2018
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
Scroll
$
1,461,488.76
$
4,153,832.71
$
497,337.43
$
6,112,658.90
Abatements
$
(4,478.39)
$
(41,471.96)
$
-
$
(45,950.35)
Adjustments
$
-
$
926.74
$
926.74
Total Levy
$
1,457,010.37
$
4,113,287.49
$
497,337.43
$
6,067,635.29
Collections to Date
$
331,512.16
$
98,024.30
$
1,968.03
$
431,504.49
*Refunds
$
22,505.24
$
7,585.15
$
506.28
$
30,596.67
Write -off
$
(22,272.83)
$
(172,820.28)
$
(90,505.47)
$
(285,598.58)
Outstanding Balance
$
1,125,730.62
$
3,850,028.06
$
405,370.21
$
5,381,128.89
YTD Interest Collected
$
50,072.76
$
15,778.71
$
1,209.00
$
67,060.47
Total Prior Year Collections YTD
467,968.29
Grand Total All Collections YTD $131,946,435.64
* Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chair
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1
New Hanover County Debt Service Monthly Collection Report for Decmeber 2019
Current Year 2019 -2020
Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 17,291,416.95
Prior Years 2009 -2018
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles
Combined
Combined
Scroll /Billed
$
19,340,467.56
$
1,907,233.98
$
766,467.05
$
22,014,168.59
Abatements
$
(6,095.45)
$
(22,218.02)
$
-
$
(28,313.47)
Adjustments
$
1,341.07
$
37,688.93
$
-
$
39,030.00
Total Taxes Charged
$
19,335,713.18
$
1,922,704.89
$
766,467.05
$
22,024,885.12
Collections to Date
$
15,530,379.49
$
994,570.41
$
766,467.05
$
17,291,416.95
*Refunds
$
24.45
$
24.14
$
(17.49)
$
48.59
Write -off
$
(28.28)
$
(155.42)
192,082.41
$
$
(183.70)
Outstanding Balance
$
3,805,329.86
$
928,003.20
$
-
$
4,733,284.47
Collection Percentage
80.32
51.73
100.00
78.51
YTD Interest Collected
$
285.27
$
-
$
6,379.69
Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 17,291,416.95
Prior Years 2009 -2018
Total Prior Year Collections YTD
*Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chair
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1
$ 47,924.12
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
Scroll
$
125,470.73
$
202,521.88
$
$
327,992.61
Abatements
$
(332.95)
$
(3,506.23)
$
(3,839.18)
Adjustments
$
122.29
$
122.29
Total Levy
$
125,137.78
$
199,137.94
$
$
324,275.72
Collections to Date
$
36,373.05
$
7,984.06
$
$
44,357.11
*Refunds
$
459.59
$
946.02
$
$
1,405.61
Write -off
$
(9.61)
$
(17.49)
$
$
(27.10)
Outstanding Balance
$
89,214.71
$
192,082.41
$
$
281,297.12
YTD Interest Collected
$
4,125.60
$
847.02
1 $
$
4,972.62
Total Prior Year Collections YTD
*Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chair
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1
$ 47,924.12
New Hanover County Fire District Monthly Collection Report for December 2019
Current Year 2019 -2020
Scroll /Billed
Abatements
Adjustments
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
$ 8,768,856.40
$ (942.05)
$ 5,408.79
$ 1,224,281.14
$ 3,068.41
$ 154.62
$ 443,192.09
$
$
$
10,436,329.63
2,126.36
5,563.41
Total Taxes Charged
Collections to Date
*Refunds
Write -off
$
$
$
$
8,773,323.14
7,389,111.28
-
(20.78)
$
$
$
$
1,227,504.17
667,520.25
-
(110.40)
$
$
443,192.09
443,192.09
$
$
$
$
10,444,019.40
8,499,823.62
(131.18)
Outstanding Balance
$
1,384,191.08
$
559,873.52
$
-
$
1,944,064.60
Collection Percentage
84.22
136.29
54.39
$
100.00
$
81.39
YTD Interest Collected
$
317.27
$
-
$
6,322.43
$
6,639.70
$
76.51
$
21,040.46
*Refunds
$
-
$
959.37
Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD
8,506,463.32
Prior Years 2009 -2018
Real Estate
Personal Property
Motor Vehicles
Combined
Scroll
$
81,964.20
$
227,599.09
$
28,922.46
$
338,485.75
Abatements
$
(626.16)
$
(2,456.01)
$
(3,082.17)
Adjustments
$
136.29
$
136.29
Total Levy
$
81,338.04
$
225,279.37
$
28,922.46
$
335,539.87
Collections to Date
$
15,311.81
$
5,652.14
$
76.51
$
21,040.46
*Refunds
$
-
$
959.37
$
959.37
Write -off
$
(771.62)
$
(8,787.80)
$
(4,601.66)
$
(14,161.08)
Outstanding Balance
$
65,254.61
$
211,798.80
$
24,244.29
$
301,297.70
YTD Interest Collected
$
2,649.42
$
794.65
$
59.30
$
3,503.37
Total Prior Year Collections YTD
24,543.83
Grand Total All Collections YTD $ 8,531,007.15
* Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Chair
Clerk to the Board
Date
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 7 - 3 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Consent
DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Allison Snell, Tax Administrator
CONTACT(S): Trina Lewis, Collectons Supervisor
SUBJECT:
Approval of Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real Property
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Per NCGS 105 -369 (a) (b1), in February of each year, the tax collector must report to the governing body the total
amount of unpaid taxes for the current fiscal year that are liens on real property. A county tax collector's report is due
the first Monday in February. The governing body must order the tax collector to advertise the tax liens. The tax
collector must send a notice to the record owner of the affected parcel at the last known address at least 30 days prior
to the date of advertisement. The tax collector must publish each lien at least one time in one or more newspapers
having general circulation in the taxing unit. Advertisements of tax liens shall be made during the period of March 1
through June 30.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the order for advertisement.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 8
NEW HAN OVER COUNTY
TAX DEPARTMENT
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 190, Wilmington, NC 28403
P:(910)798-7300 I F:(910)798-7310 I NHCgov.com
Allison Snell, Tax Administrator
Order for Advertisement of 2019 Unpaid Tax Liens on Real Property
As required by G.S. 105- 369(a)and(bl) Advertisement of Unpaid Tax Liens of Real Property
It is hereby ordered that the Collector of Revenue provide the New Hanover County Board of
commissioners a total of all unpaid real property taxes for the 2019 -2020 fiscal year. The Collector of
Revenue will cause to have published once in a local newspaper all unpaid 2019 tax liens on real property
during the period prescribed by law. The advertisement will combine the liens of the County of New
Hanover, City of Wilmington, Town of Kure Beach, Town of Wrightsville Beach, Town of Carolina
Beach and the Fire District taxes thereon this 3rd day of February, 2019.
Real Property Taxes Unpaid for 2019 -2020
New Hanover
$6,067,076.67
Fire District
$364,983.24
Debt Service
$849,182.41
Wilmington
$3,005,103.44
Wilmington
MSD
$17,110.89
Wrightsville
Beach
$127,975.17
Carolina Beach
$259,879.42
Kure Beach
$111,033.63
*YTD TOTAL
$10,802,344.87
*YTD totals are from effective date 111712020
Julia Olson- Boseman, Chair
Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 8 - 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: County PRESENTER(S): Bill Norris, CFPUA Board Chair and Jim Flechtner, CFPUA
Manager Executive Director
CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager
SUBJECT:
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority Annual Report
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Bill Norris and Jim Flechtner will present the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority ( CFPUA) Annual Report
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hear report.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Hear report.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Heard report.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 9
l!"
0
I
'It
a
a k=o 0
Ipt
it all
ITEM: 9 -1 -1
•
j I /it
00
00,
1pg�
K'Q
AANI 7kk ID M qW
► 2019 saw a continued focus on
CFPUA's customers, with
Customer Service handling
105,189 calls.
► Constructed and rehabilitated
infrastructure.
zn
� Cape Fear
Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 2
► Ongoing projects to enhance
filtration advanced public health.
► The Authority's net financial
position increased by $23.7
million.
Since 2008...
Customer
Growth
Operating
Costs per
Customer
zn
� Cape Fear
Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 3
Value of water and sewer infrastructure
conveyed to CFPUA by developers in 2019:
$10,14951892
Annual CFPUA water and sewer bills as
a percent of median household income:
1.67%
Brunswick County: 1.86%
ONWASA: 1.98%
Fayetteville Public Works Commission: 1.82%
Source: UNCSchool of Government, Environmental Finance Center
r
U.S. 421 Water and Sewer Expansion
Construction projects valued at
nearly $89 million put out to bid
Lin 2019.
Joint project to extend services along the U.S. 421 corridor to Pender County, completed in November.
Cost: $15.5 million.
Additional Raw Water Line
Joint project with Brunswick County to build 14 miles of
pipeline from Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority's
Kings Bluff Pump Station in Bladen County to Town of
Northwest. Construction began in December.
New line will increase CFPUA's raw water capacity by 15 MGD.
c
Total project cost: $44 million
� Cape Fear Cost to CFPUA: $16.1 million
Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 4
.e 'M'
��V
OWATITrwir-
,fp
Plans were finalized in 2019 to add eight new
deep -bed granular activated carbon (GAC)
filters to the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant.
The new filters will substantially reduce levels
of PFAS in our treated water.
February 2022: Filters expected to come online.
Z� Total project cost: $43 million
� Cape Fear
Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 5
$1,407,834
$2,213,571 $5,280,566
$5,175,342 ,,
Fixed Water/WastewaterCharges
$29,997,568 ■ Volumetric WaterlWastewater Charges
■ System Development Charges
Investment Earnings
$44,274,588
Grants from other Governments
■ Other Service Charges
zn Revenues:
$88,349,469
� Cape Fear
Public Utility Authorltyrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 6
12
$18,1 52,407
$19,619,156
w— Debt Service
Operating
Salaries & Benefits
Capital Projects
Expenditures:
$83,298,631
AW I -INf
d116 d116 d116 d116
These and other accomplishments
result from our employees' hard
work and dedication to
customers. Whether repairing
broken water mains in the middle
of the night or helping customers
get the most out of their service,
the staff at CFPUA gets the credit
for our achievements.
zn
Owl Cape Fear
Public Utility Authorrd of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Stewardship. Sustainability. Service. ITEM: 9 - 1 - 7
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner
CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler and Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing NOTE: Applicant has Requested a Continuance
Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on Behalf of the Property Owners, Murray,
Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39 Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market
Street and the 8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional
Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to Construct a Residential Development Consisting of
Multi- Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 52.39 acres from R -15 and R -20 to (CZD) RMF -L in order to
construct a residential development consisting of multi- family, duplex, and single - family housing.
The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed at a community
meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units. The plan for the Board of
Commissioners' consideration has been reduced to 300 units from the original 406 units proposed, including the
elimination of 108 apartments.
The applicant's current plan proposes 204 apartments, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family dwellings for a density of
5.7 du /ac. In addition, since the initial application, the height and unit count has been reduced for six of the proposed
multi- family buildings located adjacent to existing single - family residences along the northern property
line. Specifically, the buildings were reduced from 3 stories to 2 stories, and from 24 units to 16 units.
The proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi- family on the western portion of the site
to duplex and then single - family on the east end of the site. The proposed multi- family housing, and the majority of the
units for the project, are located closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is the major commercial node
of the northern portion of the County and is identified as one of three Growth Nodes in the Comprehensive Plan.
According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds and an
infiltration basin. The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 100 -
year storm event (:t10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the
facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event ( =8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period).
The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained by NCDOT. The applicant
has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been approved by NCDOT and the
WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single - family homes and 348 multi- family units on the subject
property (406 total units - which exceeds the currently proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by
the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in the PM peak
hour.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10
As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family homes under the performance
residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the PM peak
hours. The proposed development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number of
trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak.
The notable roadway improvements required with the TIA include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch
Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The applicant is also proposing to add this improvement as a
condition on the development.
The site is classified as General Residential and Community Mixed Use in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is
intended to provide alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached development, the overall
project density is in -line with those characteristic of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the
highest density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which is part of the Porters Neck
Growth Node and designated as Community Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the
orderly transition of densities and intensities.
The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, numerous residents
attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition presented concerns including those relating to
traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods.
The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with the purposes and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to
lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the
Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would
benefit the community by providing diverse housing options.
The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions:
1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event.
2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch
Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from
NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards.
3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation
subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only.
4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi- family section of the project and the duplex housing
preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing westbound travel for residents of the duplex
and single - family housing in the development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction.
NOTE: Two petitions have been provided by residents who oppose the application. Hard copies of the petitions have
been provided to the Clerk's Office and are also viewable online at: https:Htinyurl.com /Z19- 14petitions
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the application.
After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community representatives opposing the
application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4 requiring a gate in the middle of the project
because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff
recommends this condition be removed due to this concern.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10
Example Motion of Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with
the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses
from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the
recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find
APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase
traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district:
Staff Suggested Conditions:
1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event.
2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch
Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from
NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards.
The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation
subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only.
Example Motion of Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of
uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the
recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of
the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the
desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhoods.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval with conditions 1 -3 as recommended by the Planning Board and staff.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Continued at the petitioner's request to April 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10
SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z19 -14)
Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on behalf of the property owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to
rezone approximately 52.39 acres of land located near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the
8300 block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional
Residential Multi - Family Low Density District, in order to construct a residential development
consisting of multi - family, duplex, and single - family housing.
1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for
rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal
provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides
for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community
Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the
area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district:
1 . The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year
storm event.
2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn
lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with
US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be
constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards.
3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the
Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency
vehicles only.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10-1 -1
Example Motion of Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal
provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides
for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community
Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired
character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhoods.
Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial:
I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be
[Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert
reasons]
I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because [insert reasons]
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 1 - 2
STAFF REPORT FOR Z19 -14
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z19 -14
Request:
Rezoning to a Multi - Family Residential Low Density District
Applicant:
Property Owner(s):
Logan Developers, Inc.
Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al
Location:
Acreage:
Near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the
52.39
8300 block of Shiraz Way
PID(s):
Comp Plan Place Type:
Parcel ID numbers are listed in the application package.
Community Mixed Use & General
Residential
Existing Land Use:
Proposed Land Use:
Low Density Residential, Agriculture
Multi - Family, Duplex, and Single -
Family Housing
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
R -15 & R -20
(CZD) RMF -L
APPLICATION BACKGROUND
The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed
at a community meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units.
The plan being considered by the Board of Commissioners has been reduced to 300 units from the
original 406 units proposed, including the elimination of 108 apartments. Because of this, technical
documents (primarily the Traffic Impact Analysis) included with the application may have studied
the impacts of a more intense development on the property than is currently proposed. Where
possible, staff and applicant have provided updated data.
Site Plan Version
Proposed Units
1. Studied in TIA /First Community Meeting
406 total - 312 apts, 36 duplex, 58 SFD
2. 2 "d Community Meeting
388 total -288 apts, 34 duplex, 66 SFD
3. Initial Rezoning Application
384 total - 288 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD
4. January Planning Board Meeting
324 total -228 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD
5. Feb BOC Version
300 total - 204 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 1 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 1
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE
ZONING
North
Single - Family Residential (Vineyard Plantation)
R -15, R -20
East
Undeveloped, Porters Neck Fire Station, Davis
R -20, (CUD) 0&1
Community
South
Single - Family Residential (Tibbys Branch)
R -15
Market Street/l -140 Interchange, Lowe's Home
West
Improvement
CUD B -2
(CUD)
s. ii r� ��"� t+ d a �a 7�- ♦+ �� � r� � - sy�` � �#��} Q,S���le� '1�� ��
Aerial N. °��?- ���44 E °�� +`� ,wg4` '�`'' �"�►1�
plffv
L [ % X + • + ✓!#�♦ v �� *e f�4M@ ►�+R! V� y" 4F %�� r �i 1�
/''° -k ++/// a '` s '•f "!.�+ ! •.'2r ' �?Q.� ti �'`'�r a° �q7� �,y� ®� k� t[P� � P`vay t °rt 9- �,.
P1A�1',�i y���T �. `�+ r `� �i *y.. ,�1!!Oa �'yC' � ,:� +O'fd. �5'.�y �•°'r^�C,�Ai 43' 'it tCw �5�����i��_:
ION O �� F,p' �� _. �a r, -�"' *, , O �fi • *' •- a!v'7i .�,.7.��R Ysr,����'r �
5\ ✓. s' g r � e. '� � Ffi ,�� �. of
n
_PS��� 9•arr n shy ew;
` d N '�'. �'s '' '� ;e � ki�''�,� 9�,��4}� ��•1;��Aa'�,,�F�"�y�+f4R� \5�:�� ®W������:����s
Z1 9 -14
`�� ��. i . •. ,� ��'� +��� o�,�� � tea' � � � \ .�°
,'P ���tj�`'��,'aja-�5��1 �, `�+fi�, +e'�a�� a °��h� k�?y -\ ��L" �,6,� �j�,i1H► 16�� �E!: t " �' ,�� b'"
=.� q, '� ,,;'a►"�i:R��g��,, � F�;� -+.. A I� Nevu Han ue Cow t '��:
ZONING HISTORY
July 6, 1971 The site was initially zoned R -15 and R -20 (Area 5)
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 2 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 2
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water /Sewer
Water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be
Historic
determined during site plan review.
Fire Protection
New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Station Porters Neck
Current: Blair Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools.
Schools
*See the attached New Hanover County Schools, NC Redistricting Study 2020: Options
Statistics
Recreation
Ogden Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
No known conservation resources
Historic
No known historic resources
Archaeological
No known archaeological resources
APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
"01d"
Market _
Street
� -- — Site Boundary
�U`L
i
Includes Staff
LShi- ra x
Way
APorters Neck
Road Edgewater
Club Road
Roundabout
• The applicant's proposed conceptual plan indicates the residential development will consist
of 204 multi - family units, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family lots, for a total of 300 units.
• In addition to the density reductions made after the community meetings, the overall density
for the project has been reduced twice since it was submitted to the County due to feedback
received from the Planning Board. The original application submitted to the Planning Board
proposed at total of 384 units. The current plan has eliminated 84 apartment units from
the original application.
• The subject site is long and narrow (about 4,500 square feet long and 550 feet in width)
impacting design options.
• The 204 multi - family units will be located within 1 1 buildings containing 12 to 24 units each.
Six buildings located adjacent existing single - family residences along the northern property
line are proposed to be limited to 2 stories, while the remaining buildings along the southern
property are proposed to be 3 stories. A 20 -foot opaque bufferyard is required between
the multi - family buildings and the abutting single - family housing.
Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 3 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 3
• Developments within the proposed RMF -L district may be constructed in accordance with the
County's existing performance residential standards, which provides flexibility by allowing
multiple housing types and not requiring minimum lot sizes. The flexibility of performance
developments allows for additional land to be utilized for open space and stormwater
purposes by clustering development on the site.
• The applicant's proposed conceptual site plan indicates approximately 1 1.8 acres of the
site (22 %) will be reserved for active and passive recreation space for the residents of the
development. The total open space (undeveloped, stormwater, and buffer areas) is about
24 acres of the site (46 %).
• The subject site does not directly access Market Street, requiring use of area collector roads.
The primary access points will be to "Old" Market Street on the west side of the site and
Shiraz Way on the east side of the site.
• Roadway connections will also be made to three road stubs located in the Vineyard
Plantation subdivision abutting the site to the north. However, the applicant is proposing a
condition to gate these accessways and limit access to emergency vehicles only.
• The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up
to a 100 -year storm event (�:-- 10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the
County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event (�:=8
inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). According the County's watershed data, the
downstream outfall of the site flows south toward Pages Creek. However, if this request is
approved, direction of the downstream flow will be verified during the TRC review process
when more detailed engineering design is completed.
• According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet
detention ponds and an infiltration basin. The infiltration basin is proposed on the eastern
end of the site near Shiraz Way. A soils test performed by the applicant where the basin
is proposed indicated an infiltration rate of over 20 inches /hr. The applicant also provided
an exhibit illustrating the downstream outfall. More information is provided in the
applicant's submittal documents.
Existing Ditch to Proposed Existing
Be Cleaned 8 Culvert POPE! with
Stabilized; to Oetfall into
Remain Unpiped Stream 'IT w,vl.rs 4, ^� al° rnG.s ORMIE YAREA UPI
... Ac ACm'E cE. HEIGHEORH6G�PARR
oi ini
Eruno AREA NEEGEB WaP —FOR ui GAa
ness -- ouPGEx, rrP.
swEEr 11TTOTA6 ewl.Glnas NAxl —I mPEnimE1€R SE.e.,�c Nnll.r wr
za. rm.lsG. I1r Nrxl
I�ET�R��LwTIEE�I � —
_ FIRE
I
®® ®�dI °000 ,01010{ °10;0 '3 $OIIS Tested In
._ Infiltration Basin
proved
I- —T° T� 1 T I1 7 –T
® ®E ° ? Infiltration Ratc
' �; is Very High:
°Y JT -7–T; °''� Lin \ 1 vo
Ii l_ SIG �+ L� 11'
l
THAN IN HD
ormwater r� �/� �\ Existng Swale As
Pond TR9 DErnE A r OuHflll for
St
_ 7 Ou(alls [o \ Infiltration Basin
ormweter Ditch \ N N j /II.
Pond
Outfalls to
1 \ N Culvert Takes Water
from Swale to Adjace
,it,,
Z Z-1
nt
PO &TEES p� RCr: &QAD yH , DItCn
x 1 40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE., NEIGHBORHOOD
t 2 fi5 AIPAG— DPEN SPACE (EXCLUDESV—LANm PROPOSED 20' 15,83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
ACCESSauTILHr Exi,75 Ditch
uENr
Applicant's Exhibit of the Proposed Stormwater Facilities
Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 4 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 4
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Approximately 40.5 acres of the site is zoned R -15 and the remaining 11.9 acres is zoned
R -20. Under the County's performance residential standards, the portion zoned R -15 would
be permitted up to 102 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du /ac and the portion zoned R-
20 would be permitted up to 22 dwelling units at a density of 1.9 du /ac. The total number
of units permitted under the current zoning is 124.
• The proposed 300 units equates to an overall density of 5.7 du /ac, however, the majority
of the units are contained within the multi - family buildings located on the western portion of
the site closest to Market Street /US 17.
21.2 acres
... 62 units
2.9 du/ac
`�� `•►� � t,°e` �, air �C�p'!�i �A�I'Cr3�lI�: �7rWjv _ �' I
e 77
The applicant's proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi-
family on the western portion of the site to duplex and then single - family on the east end
of the site. This transiting development pattern is similar to the Marsh Oaks area, located to
the south along Market Street, which transitions from commercial /multi- family development
(Aldi, Amberleigh Shores) to townhomes, and then single - family housing. A similar example
in the City of Wilmington is Fairfield Park located along Carolina Beach Road. However,
in both of these examples, the more intense development has direct access to an arterial
road.
The proposed multi - family housing, and the majority of the units for the project, are located
closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is identified in the Comprehensive
Plan as one of three Growth Nodes in the County. Growth Nodes are intended to be focus
areas of development, encouraging high- density development that promotes alternative
transportation options. The intent is to cluster growth in these areas so that public
transportation connections can be accomplished. The boundaries of these nodes are not site
specific and are intended to be a general representation of the area.
The Porters Neck community is the major commercial node of the northern portion of the
County, containing big box retailers (Wal -Mart and Lowes), grocery stores (Harris Teeter
and Food Lion), restaurants (Cast Iron Kitchen, Slice of Life, Buffalo Wild Wings, etc.), and
medical offices (Wilmington Health, Medac). However, other than a gas station /convenience
store, the existing commercial development in this node is primarily located west of Market
Street or south of Porters Neck Road on the east side of Market Street.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 5 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 5
Porters Neck Node 0
►� General Boundary of the
�e Porters Neck Growth Node
as shown in the
Comprehensive Plan
r
7. - • °- °- --^TM•x
\., 0
Subject
_ MEDAL
EON site
or
� � R
�qa
r� Harri <_
— 'Tsetse Zoning Districts .
kircue� s �. ,,fir B -1 L 1 -1
- B -2 L 0 &1
sX n, CUD B -1 R -10
> iOCUD B -2 R -15
WILMI
e..
HEALNFGTON V B -✓4 ® CZD B-1 R-20
JS 60,
B
TRANSPORTATION
• The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained
by NCDOT. In addition, roadway connections will be made to existing road stubs abutting
the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision, however, the applicant is
proposing to gate these connections and limit access to emergency vehicles only.
• The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been
approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single -
family homes and 348 multi - family units on the subject property (406 total units — which
exceeds the proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by the Institute
of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in
the PM peak hour.
• As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family
homes under the performance residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling
typically generates about one trip during the PM peak hours. Therefore, the property could
currently generate approximately 124 trips during the PM peak hours. The proposed
development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number
of trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak.
Site Trip Distribution
• The TIA estimates that distribution of traffic to and from the site will be split 5050 with half
of the trips utilizing Shiraz Way and half utilizing "Old" Market Street. This distribution was
proposed by the applicant and approved by the WMPO and NCDOT.
Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 6 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 6
Vehicle Trip Distribution at Notable Intersections During the
Peak Hours
* Number values below indicate the number of estimated vehicular trips generated by the proposed
development (based on the current proposal of 300 units) in the AM and PM peak hours.
Red Arrows = Trips
1. US 17 at Futch
Creek Road/ "Old" SL ,, Exiting the Site
�Pls'vP
c�
�Oo
a
.4
' � P•
Area Map
x 58 PM
Right on Porters
Neck Road
i
2_ Market Street At Porters Neck Road
Blue Arrows = Trips
Entering the Site
x 7 AM
24 PM
4 b
Through to U5 17
x 21 PM {/
U -Turn 8; x 24 AM
Through 14 PM
Through to
z 11 AM� Hampstead
= 36 PM
Right to -' 7 AM
Futch Creek 24 PM
Road Left to Futch
r
Creek Road
61 AM
36 PM
Right on US 17
7. US 17 at Futch Creek Roar!
3_ Porters Neck RoundaboutlSite Access
Source: Applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (Ramey Kemp & Associates)
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 7
Page 7 of 17
Level of Service
• The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable
intersections in the area including the following:
• Porters Neck Road at Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way (roundabout)
• Market Street at Porters Neck Road
• Futch Creek Road /Market Street at US 17
• US 17 at U -turn Location (north of Futch Creek Road).
• Below is the LOS of the intersections described in the TIA. The data provides the overall
LOS of the intersection, and was updated by the applicant's traffic engineer to reflect the
conceptual plan presented at the Planning Board meeting that included 324 units. The
current plan has 24 fewer units. The reduction is expected to slightly reduce the delays.
• The TIA, based on the original 406 total units, also provides data on all intersection
movements (left turn, right turn, through movement, etc.). There are some current and future
movements with a F LOS located at the intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street.
These movements generally consist of the left turns and traffic crossing Market Street. The
TIA indicated the proposed development will increase the delay of one of these movements
(the westbound left on Porters Neck).
• The TIA did not include the impact of the improvements from the Military Cutoff extension
project currently under construction. That project is expected to be completed around the
proposed build out date for the requested development (late 2022/early 2023).
Porters Neck Road at Edgewater
Scenario
6MME
Club Road/Shiraz Way
Overall LOS
1 A
(roundabout)
Delay in Seconds
2019 Existing
A
8
2023 Future
A
9
2023 Future with Project
Alw� L
2019 Existing
A
PM PEAK
A
10
7
2023 Future
A
8
2023 Future with Project
A
9
Market Street
Scenario
and Porters Neck Road
Overall LOS
Delay in Seconds
2019 Existing
D
41
2023 Future
D
43
2023 Future with Project
D
45
FAMMIT, M,
2019 Existing
D
44
2023 Future
D
47
2023 Future with Project
D
48
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 8
Page 8 of 17
US 17 at Market
Scenario
Street/Futch Creek
Overall LOS
...
Delay in Seconds
2019 Existing
B
18
2023 Future
B
20
2023 Future with Project
C
24
2019 Existing
C
33
2023 Future
C
31
2023 Future with Project
D
37
US 17 at U-Turn
Scenario
(North of Futch Creek Road)
Overall LOS Delay in Seconds
2019 Existing
C
22
2023 Future
C
26
2023 Future with Project
C
ViVAN . ,
31
2019 Existing
A
9
2023 Future
B
10
2023 Future with Project
B
13
Required or Proposed Improvements
• The TIA has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The notable roadway
improvements required include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch Creek
Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The application is also proposing to add
this improvement as a condition on the development.
Notable Roadway Improvement:
r
r =•
Installation of a Second
Right -Turn Lane to
Create Dural Rights
NIP
• Futch Creek
kf s Road market
Street
Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020 Page 9 of 17
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 9
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Report
• The residents of Vineyard Planation recently commissioned a Traffic Calming Assessment
due to speeding concerns in their neighborhood. The assessment, which was prepared by
Kittelson & Associates, Inc., examined certain roads in the neighborhood and made the
following findings:
Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data
• The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but
not limited to:
• Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue;
• Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery
Way; and
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 10
Page 10 of 17
F— Location
Riesling Avenue
Posted Speed Limit
25 a 1ph
85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds
above 35 mph
32 mph 4.4
Average Daily Traffic
1,344
Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
25 mph
29 mph <0,1
412
Chablis Way west of ladewood Drive.
25 mph
24 mph 0.1
424
Winery Way
25 mph
29 mph 2.5
412
• The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but
not limited to:
• Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue;
• Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery
Way; and
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 10
Page 10 of 17
o Using speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed.
• NCDOT has reviewed the assessment and provided comments. The HOA can proceed with
installing the recommended speed humps on Riesling Avenue pending receiving an
encroachment agreement with NCDOT.
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 11
Page 11 of 17
• STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension).
• Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1-140.
• The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late
2022 /early 2023.
• The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of
Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project.
• STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median)
• Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street
from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways
will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5-
foot sidewalk on the western side of the street.
• The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late
2022 /early 2023.
• NCDOT Proiect — Installation of an Additional Southbound Exit Lane on US -17 onto Market
Street
o The Board of Commissioners recently adopted a resolution to support the installation
of an additional southbound exit lane at the US 17 /Market Street Interchange. The
project is a candidate for funding through the State's High Impact Low Cost program.
o While funding for this program is currently on hold due to NCDOT' s cash flow
balance, NCDOT Division 3 has been requested to submit everything needed for the
fund requests to the Board of Transportation so there is no delay when funding
becomes available.
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development
I Land Use /Intensity
TIA Status
• 132,000 sf Office
• 18,000 sf Medical Office
• Approved August 5, 2019
1. Scotts Hill Medical
• 32,000 sf Shopping
• Phase 1 & 2: 2020 Build Out
Park
Center
Year
• 9,000 sf Pharmacy with
• Full Build 2022
Drive - Through
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• Installation of a northbound U -turn lane on US 17 south of Scott Hill Loop Road.
• Installation of a southbound left turn lane on US 17 at Scoots Hill Medical Drive.
• Installation of a northbound right turn lane, removal of the barrier from the southbound
left turn lane, and signalization of the intersection on US 17 at the site's southern access
point.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 12
Page 12 of 17
• Scotts Hill Village
• Coastal Prep Academy
Development Status: Phase 1 of the medical park has been platted consisting of 3 lots.
Currently, one office building is being constructed. No roadway improvements have been
completed at this time.
Proposed Development
I Land Use /Intensity
TIA Status
2. Waterstone
• 151 Single - Family
• Approved June 18, 2015
Dwellings
• 2020 Build Out Year
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• Installation of a southbound right turn lane on Edgewater Club Road at the site's northern
access.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• Porters Neck Elementary
Development Status: 98 lots have been platted at this time. The right turn lane has been
installed.
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on
the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class II (moderate limitation) and
Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 13
Page 13 of 17
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 14
Page 14 of 17
General Residential & Community Mixed Use located partially within
Porters Neck Growth Node.
The subject parcel is primarily General Residential, with roughly 20%
Future Land Use
designated as Community Mixed Use.
Map Place Type
Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in
proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately
developed with either place type, allowing site - specific features and
evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered.
General Residential: Focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic
and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes.
Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail
spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout.
Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family
Place Type
residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational.
Description
Community Mixed Use: Focus on small - scale, compact, mixed use
development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor
for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office,
retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi - family
and single - family residential.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 14
Page 14 of 17
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 15
Page 15 of 17
The proposed RMF -L development is located between existing lower density
residential neighborhoods and the Old Market St. corridor at the edge of
the Porters Neck Growth Node. This growth node is one of the areas
identified as where growth should be clustered and high- density
developments encouraged.
In general, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along roadways for
higher residential densities and a mix of uses and those near existing
neighborhoods as General Residential in order to allow for an orderly
transition of densities and intensities.
The proposed RMF -L zoning, one of the new zoning tools adopted in July
2019 to provide for the development patterns outlined in the
Analysis
Comprehensive Plan, would provide a transition in density and intensity
between future Community Mixed Use development along Old Market
Street and the existing single family residential districts on either side of the
subject site. Providing options for alternative housing types in direct
relationship to single - family detached development is one of the stated
intents for this district.
The overall project density of 5.7 units per acre is generally consistent with
the 6 dwelling units per acre characteristic of the General Residential place
type. The majority of that density is proposed for the western portion of the
site closest to the growth node and Community Mixed Use areas which
promotes densities up to 15 dwelling units per acre. The density of the
duplex and single - family detached portion of the project prosed for the
eastern side is closer to 3 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the
2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is intended to provide
alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached
Consistency
development, the overall project density is in -line with those characteristic
Recommendation
of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the highest
density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which
is part of the Porters Neck Growth Node and designated as Community
Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the orderly
transition of densities and intensities.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 15
Page 15 of 17
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting,
numerous residents attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition
presented concerns including those relating to traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with
the surrounding neighborhoods.
The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with
the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly
transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing
types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General
Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would
benefit the community by providing diverse housing options.
The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions:
1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm
event.
2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane
shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17.
Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in
accordance with NCDOT's standards.
3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the
Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles
only.
4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi - family section of the project and
the duplex housing preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing
westbound travel for residents of the duplex and single - family housing in the
development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Overall the project is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan
because it contributes to providing a mix of housing options in the area, provides for the orderly
transition of uses, and the overall project density is in -line with those recommended in the General
Residential and Community Mixed Use place types.
As the unique location of the site does not have direct access to an arterial street, it is anticipated
the development will increase traffic near established single - family neighborhoods. However, the
review of the TIA, which studied the impact from 406 dwelling units (exceeding the 300 units
proposed) indicates that the overall Level of Service of the major intersections in the area will
operate at an acceptable level when the proposed development is expected to be completed in
2023.
The applicant is also proposing to design the stormwater facilities to accommodate the 100 -year
storm event, which exceeds the County's requirement of designing to the 25 -year storm event.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 16
Page 16 of 17
Staff recommends approval of the application.
After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community
representatives opposing the application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4
requiring a gate in the middle of the project because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in
traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff recommends this condition be removed due
to this concern.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal
provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides
for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community
Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in
the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district:
1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm
event.
2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane
shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17.
Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in
accordance with NCDOT's standards.
3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the
Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles
only.
Example Motion of Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal
provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides
for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community
Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired
character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhoods.
Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 2.3.2020
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 2 - 17
Page 17 of 17
NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC
REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS
Elementary School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics
Cr )ppen�l5
Elementary School
2021 -22
Capacity
Total
Enrolled
DRAFT
Option 3d
Estimated
Enrollment
Alderman
270
277
298
Anderson
543
671
638
Bellamy
400
614
473
CRECC
93
126
92
Blair
549
587
510
Bradley Creek
344
417
336
Carolina Beach
370
461
437
Castle Hayne
524
539
499
College Park
488
450
574
Forest Hills
431
368
496
Freeman
358
260
276
Holly Tree
413
511
489
Murrayville
558
666
520
Ogden
534
695
582
Parsley
423
681
554
Pine Valley
416
602
517
Porter's Neck
503
518
Snipes
528
417
405
Sunset Park
435
357
500
Williams
353
449
466
Winter Park
286
310
278
Wrightsboro
499
560
569
Wrightsville Beach
265
314
305
Total
9583
10332
10332
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS
student database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22
modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These
capacities reflect the State's implementation of a
reduction in class sizes.
A
NH(S
2 Revised: 11/01/2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC
REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS
Elementary School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics (Continued)
Cr )ppen�l5
Elementary School
2021 -22
Capacity
Enrolled
Utilization
DRAFT
Option 3d
Utilization
Alderman
270
103%
110%
Anderson
543
124%
117%
Bellamy
400
154%
118%
CRECC
93
135%
99%
Blair
549
107%
93%
Bradley Creek
344
121%
98%
Carolina Beach
370
125%
118%
Castle Hayne
524
103%
95%
College Park
488
92%
118%
Forest Hills
431
85%
115%
Freeman
358
73%
77%
Holly Tree
413
124%
118%
Murrayville
558
119%
93%
Ogden
534
130%
109%
Parsley
423
161%
131%
Pine Valley
416
145%
124%
Porter's Neck
503
103%
Snipes
528
79%
77%
Sunset Park
435
82%
115%
Williams
353
127%
132%
Winter Park
286
108%
97%
Wrightsboro
499
112%
114%
Wrightsville Beach
265
118%
115%
9583
108%
108%
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS
student database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified
capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities
reflect the State's implementation of a reduction in class
sizes.
A
NH(S
3 Revised: 11/01/2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC
REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS
Middle School Options Estimated Enrollment Statistics
Cr )ppen�l5
Middle School
2021 -22
Capacity
Total
Enrolled
DRAFT
Option 3d
Estimated
Enrollment
Holly Shelter
918
697
869
Murray
768
1088
909
Myrtle Grove
706
725
858
Noble
592
918
703
Roland -Grise
690
895
911
Trask
622
760
723
Williston
736
657
767
Total 0
5032
5740
5740
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019
NHCS student database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22
modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units.
These capacities reflect the State's
implementation of a reduction in class sizes.
Middle School
2021 -22
Capacity
Enrolled
Utilization
DRAFT
Option 3d
Utilization
Holly Shelter
918
1 76%
95%
Murray
768
142%
118%
Myrtle Grove
706
103%
122%
Noble
592
155%
119%
Roland -Grise
690
130%
132%
Trask
622
122%
116%
Williston
736
89%
104%
Total
5032
114%
114%
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS
student database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22
modified capacity numbers w/o mobile units.
These capacities reflect the State's implementation
of a reduction in class sizes.
A
NHCS
9 Revised: 11/01/2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS, NC
REDISTRICTING STUDY 2020: OPTIONS STATISTICS
Hieh School Estimated Enrollment Statistics
High School
Grade
Config
2021 -22
Capacity
Total
Enrolled
Enrolled
Utilization
Ashley
9-12
1756
1838
105%
Hoggard
9-12
1742
1809
104%
Laney
9-12
1853
2093
113%
New Hanover
1 9-12
1668
1 1379
1 83%
Total Mi
5.1%
1
7019
1 7119
1 101.4%
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student
database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified capacity
numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the State's
implementation of a reduction in class sizes.
High School Demographics Statistics
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student
database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified
capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the
State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes.
Cr )ppen�l5
A
NHCS
13 Revised: 11/01/2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Enrolled
High School
Percent
Black
Percent
White
Percent
Hispanic
Percent
Other
Ashley
9.4%
73.7%
10.2%
6.8%
Hoggard
10.4%
74.7%
9.2%
5.7%
Laney
19.4%
60.1%
13.8%
6.7%
New Hanover
32.4%
46.1%
16.4%
5.1%
Total
17.1%
64.60/,
12.2%
6.2%
*Student counts are based on the 04/24/2019 NHCS student
database.
*Capacity counts were calculated using 2021 -22 modified
capacity numbers w/o mobile units. These capacities reflect the
State's implementation of a reduction in class sizes.
Cr )ppen�l5
A
NHCS
13 Revised: 11/01/2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning:
Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/
Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N
11 G 6) 1 � R -7` �
kN 1 -14fl 0
t_14Q ,�ys ski `
Q 8422 1021 81205 1V <) q� •B;Z
191 •8414 213 ��O �c� B -1 •
8390
16 2 `Z / -a �Q OQ` •h�
• Site
83x0 8839 8410 2 3� 088437 ���
836± 8370 \ '`408 412 -
�8350 N 8408 8406/
195 `8405401 84 /1' 4'4 O&I
0 8311 83421 8409 409 417 434 �O 'Q I -1
8312 8320 • 418 8417 w R -15
• 8376 4`14 425 429 8418
<201 • `43o�tTc8410
205 �20 207 \6 454\ Subject Site
•�
2176213 301 8402 8406 (6 2 y�4P CF((4R-
400
22 604 /
217 �• 404 i6 0 606•
(� 1305 0 • 412,. 14 1<V1 « 612 �'� Cy C / J` O
221 (� 421 w 1 116;
1,000
3/17 • �! 416 • 618/ 25 629 •f��\ TG E/(
�/ • � • 408 • ',R� +� %626a/ 702/620. q RU
313 32.1 420 - 622,Z(633
0 �424/•�V99\ �.l 641 �7� 0 '1'\N
401 428 500\ % 8356 `6 � /637 � 718
• 634 -1IV 705 -_722
417/ 504 /501\ X642 �645�701726
i ' 5 X702 �' *717*>\-730
42 A[� 50 ��515 713 0717 acs Ay
Vq a �`50�• 508 4,516,1519 � 7067 �•�7.18� 25 • 73
aP Cy9� X524 `601'605 , 4�\7 114/8 41.1 • 8 10 513* 517 ,� �i 13 722 726► 8403 w /
521 06014 �a609�615 730 •!> 8406 4�11aG 1 fOfVIE RD _
�l f • 608 �• 6112 8402
X605 • / �' ,� 71157• 738• \n /2$��b X011
705 • 801. • 746 I
617 • 8313 985 Q F
609 701 • • • 714 < <F
04' O 713 [ 4. 725 1009 • 1009 0 4'!p
Otr 0 , 719 0010 099 08310 aRF6,
722 805 $1,7 1007 1013 1013 Ali
71! 802 • i 804 102 97 / • 101013
Q 8257 8253 8269 �s 101
8241 • 18281'8277 Al2 602 05
8249'
q� q�p. Q 8229 0624* 71
q0 �822J !8232 640)0 1624 �12�
Z \ 82130644r636 632 � ��` ,��hA1N/(C/ PORtERS•NFCk
0. 0- 8217.652 10,9 113 ct`�y, 1P OQp R
� Qom' 104 '1 d5�941 117
Feet Parcels withir$S ners - 1 202
M: 10- 4
fi
r
C
m
S
Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning:
Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/
Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N
�� 1 W Ills
♦�1DJNG �!p
NY
MAP ww�w�w•
iii ♦i'! !i!!�i ♦i ♦mow+► R �°4� -�� ��Q �p�` p.
w�w� CUDtB�r2'yw�w�♦ �s yNAY �r9 � 1 �`N� �1"Ov
w,►5w 96 i ♦w�ww ty hj�
www ♦iPwwiwiwiwiwiw � Q- '�o. `'
wwi1�i� ♦�wwi ♦ ♦���ww �� � p ��� o
♦ �����' , `� �QU .Q WILD DUNES;CIK
CZri. B -2 :
u° Subject Site
1 -1
s:
1
Imo,
1,000
/'TIC
C
`���- �''��R ,�F�y ? ao 2Q —Water
CUD O &I ✓F Sewer
v
,4a� 4Q'V Zoning Districts
Lu
111-15
A -1 EDZD PD R -20S SC
Q� F, AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7
4.
B -1 1 -2 R -15 RA
B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU
Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD)
Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD)
COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance
r o loners - a 3, 20
Feet Incorporated Areas � � SHOD
t_ t r _ M: 10- 5
Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning:
Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/
Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N
,A M IXE
1,000
/COMMUNITY
MIXED USE
Feet
i r
m
Subject Site
GENERAL/
RESIDENTIAL
W r.1.1 349,
CONSERVATION
IL
NG,,yo
Place Types
COMMERCE ZONE
EMPLOYMENT CENTER
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
URBAN MIXED USE
�A k
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
CSR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
CONSERVATION
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 7 - 1
AN HAN V R COD U NT Y
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina
Telephone (910) 798 -7165
FAX (910) 798 -7053
plan ningdevelopment.nhcg ov.com
Appiication
� L j
Applicant /Agenti• Informc Lion
Property Owner(s)
If different than Applicant /Agent
Name
Owner Name
Logan Developers, Inc.
See Attached
Company
Owner Name 2
Logan Developers, Inc.
Address
Address
60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Belville, NC 28451
Phone
Phone
910.452.7175
Email
Email
asmith @loganhomes.com
Subject Property information
Address /Location
See Attached
Parcel Identification Number(s)
See Attached
Total Parcel(s) Acrecge
52.39 ac
Existing Zoning and Use(s)
See Attached
Future Land Use Classification
Community Mixed Use and General Residential
Application Only)
Case Number Date/Time received:
Received by:
Z ' l q
Page 3 of 7
Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 1
Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District. RMF -L Total Acreage of Proposed District. ±5239 ac
Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional
Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose
of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed).
See Attached
Proposed Condition(s)
Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the
development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These
conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community.
Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board,
and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process.
See Attached
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 4 of 7
ITEM: 10- Cepn¢+tional Zoning District Application — Updated 52017
Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip GenerationManuoi. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed
for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
iTE Land Use: See Report
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): _
AM Peak Flour Trips: _ _ PM Peak Hour Trips:
CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistentwith the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific
use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very
dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, c an
create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must
explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District
meets the following criteria.
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For
example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans)
See Attached -- - — --
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the
Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan?
See Attached
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
See Attached
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 5 of 7
ITEM: 10 -C8— itional Zoning District Application –Updated 5/20T7
APPLICATIO N REQUIREMENTS
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed
items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial'. If an item is not applicable, mark as "NIA ".
Applications must be complete in order to process for further review.
Required Information
Applicant
Staff
Initial
Initial
1
Complete Conditional Zoning District application.
a 5
2
Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An
additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review).
�5
3
Community meeting written summary.
4
Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips).
�5
5
Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page
reference of the property requested for rezoning.
6
Site Plan including the following elements:
* Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads.
Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential
uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be
occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non-
residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height
of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific
purpose for which it will be used.
Development schedule including proposed phasing.
Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local
traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access
to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets
�7
and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas.
I�
All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks,
rights -of -way, buffering and signage.
® The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable.
Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding
General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be
regulated by State law or Local Ordinance.
Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change
Ref. Article VII as applicable).
7
1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard
copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan.
t�s
8
1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans.
g
Page 6 of 7
Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 4
By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional
Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. i understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be
correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify
that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief.
If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on
my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my
behalf to:
1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials;
2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and
3. Acton my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising
out of this application.
Signature of Property Owner(s)
�//( 4,
Signatur o Appli a gent
Print Name(s)
A40126�/
Print Name
NOTE, Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner
of record.
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice
has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendared for the next
meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will
act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is
granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website
will be required.
�'oNTY:'�
•f. ,
\,"
p
n
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 Page 7 of 7
ITEM: 1 0 -Qm itional Zoning District Application —Updated 5/2017
0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING & LAND USE
o
Wi a
AUTHORITY FOR
Fri ®usartni" APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
Print Farm
230 Government Center Drive
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 2843
910 -798 -7165 phone
910 -798 -7053 fax
www.nhegov.com
Please note that for quasi - judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for
the case at the public hearing.
The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent
for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or
an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby
authorized to, on behalf of the property owner:
1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials
2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner
3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or
indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning
Ordinance.
Agent Information
Property Owner(s)
Subject Property
Name
Owner Name
Address
Logan Developers, Inc.
See Attached Subject Property Owners
See Attached
Company
Owner Name 2
City, State, Zip
Logan Developers, Inc.
See Attached
See Attached
Address
Address
Parcel ID
60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1
See Attached
See Attached
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Belville, NC 28451
See Attached
Phone
Phone
910.452.7175
See Attached
Email
Email
asmith@loganhomes.com
ApplicationTracking Information
See Attached
(Staff 0111v)
Case Number Reference:
Uate/Time received:
Received bv:
10
This document was willfully executed on the
day of
October
�0
19
Owner 1 Signature Owner 2 Signature
09114
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545
PARAMOUNTE
E N G I N E E R I M G, I N C.
Porters Oaks Conditional Rezoning Application
Subject Property Owners
PIN:
R02900- 004 - 007 -000
Book / Page:
1611/1259
Property Address:
8390 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411
Parcel Acreage:
0.22 ac
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential
Property Owner:
Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley as
the heirs of Robert C Jr & Emma Murray
Phone:
DocuSigned by:
F
Phone:
Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS..
Robe zt%&jrr(y96blJrt...
Email:
DocuSigned by:
A4
Ulrike . rz yF6avuse of Robert C. Murray, IIII
DocuSigned by:
Sandra lsd§64az...
PIN:
R02900- 004 - 008 -000
Book / Page:
9906/1103
Property Address:
8370 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411
Parcel Acreage:
0.92 ac
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential
Property Owner:
Ben G. Murray Jr., married as the sole heir of
Ben G Murray
Phone:
DocuSigned by:
Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS..
by:
Email:
FDocuSig"ed
Joyce A. ra4b&aQUf�eA @.f. Ben G. Murray, Jr.
PIN: R02900- 004 - 019 -000
Book / Page: 5558/0221
Property Address: 8370 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage: 0.29 ac
Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential
Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3
P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 7
DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545
PIN:
DocuSigned by:
Phone:
5558/0221
Property Address:
Ro 111
Email:
DocuSigned by:
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land
Property Owner:
Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley
UI #�YWAWPfFspouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII
DocuSigned by-
Phone:
DocuSigned by:
—
San 3.K.Osrrz y
PIN:
R02900- 004 - 009 -000
Book / Page:
5558/0221
Property Address:
8376 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage:
14.30 ac
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District / 101 - Agricultural
Property Owner:
Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley
DocuSigned by:
F
Phone:
Ro 2L"PfMMTW,1llll
Email:
DocuSigned by:
Ulr KDIVIE4FtKtpouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII
DocuSigned by: /I
'
Al/A.
v^ Pra j( -(-14
Sa 3kLDFSPta&.y
PIN:
R03700- 001 - 007 -000
Book / Page:
5558/0221
Property Address:
8380 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage:
11.69 ac
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land
Property Owner:
Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley
DocuSigned by-
Phone:
Rob .1Wruga,2flll
Email:
DocuSigned by:
Ulrik oMw`d'Dam-fi (rouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII
DocuSigned by:
Sand 3-6- "lie8WA82...
PIN: R03700- 001 - 006 -000
Book / Page: 1592/1390
Property Address: 8313 Shiraz Way, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage: 1.07 ac
Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3
P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545
Property Owner: Robert C Murray III and wife Ulrike H. Murray
DocuSigned by:
Phone:
Email: DocuSigned by:
U I kdo *Auga yF...
PIN: R02900- 004 - 010 -000
Book / Page: 9905/1807
Property Address: 421 Tibby's Drive, Wilmington INC 28411
Parcel Acreage: 12.86 ac
Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 10 -1 Family Residential
Property Owner: Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and
Antonia M Foy Life Estate
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3
P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 9
DocuSigned by:
Phone:
tilt ISS
A�foad6���s
Email:
DocuSigned by:
E;6tvu wusS
iw @AsV..
DocuSigned by:
SOgW,& i�uSS
9409 fo6y by Sognia F. Weiss
her Attorney in Fact
PIN:
R02900- 004 - 010 -001
Book / Page:
9905/1807
Property Address:
8362 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage:
0.73 ac
Existing Zoning & Use:
R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land
Property Owner:
Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and
Antonia M Foy Life Estate
Phone:
DocuSigned by:
&41- (bliss
Email:
i�lf9dtsld�ES$
DocuSigned by:
E;hMt'V' UA-SS
(w wN�V...
DocuSigned/ by:
s�c�Bs6�sy. by Sognia F. Weiss
her Attorney in Fact
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3
P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 9
DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545
PIN: R03700- 001 - 003 -000
Book / Page: 5801/1623
Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage: 3.32 ac
Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land
Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability
company
DocuSigned by:
Phone: FiL F7o d err-.•L Jr.
B "(Prwd8 Tuurray, Jr.,
Member and General Manager
Email:
PIN: R03700- 001 - 002 -000
Book / Page: 5801/1623
Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411
Parcel Acreage: 6.97 ac
Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential
Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability
company
DocuSigned by:
Phone: JL Flo d urr.,• Jr.
By mfdoQfdchLarray, Jr.,
Member and General Manager
Email:
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3
P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 10
PARAMOUNTE
E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C,
Upol ti id: N 1 =T--i - -r 18, 2019
Date: October 10, 2019
Project Narrative - The Oaks at Murray Farm:
The proposed development is located between Old Market Street, Shiraz Way, and Tibby's
Drive and is comprised of the following parcels totaling +52.39 acres:
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
The zoning of the parcels is R -15 in the middle to northwest portion of the tract, the portion
fronting Old Market Street. The rear of the property is zoned R -20. The NHC Future Land
Use Plan identifies the front third of the site as community mixed use and the rear as general
residential. This area east /southeast of Market Street is identified as a growth node with an
emphasis on commercial and dense residential uses. The rear of the site is slated as general
residential and transitions from the growth node into the neighborhood fabric of the Porters
Neck area.
In keeping with the split land uses, we present a project with apartments near Market Street
in the growth node and transition into the duplexes and single family more aligned with
general residential. To create this cohesively designed mixture of product types on the
subject parcels, we respectfully request the property be conditionally rezoned to the RMF -L
Residential Multi- family Low Density). This proposed zoning district is one of the new
districts recently approved to offer better, more site specific development options. This
RMF -L zone allows us to provide a mixture of product types integrated into common open
space, landscape, and other improvements that make a project feel like it is blended and
well thought -out.
Part of the charm of this property is the large trees as seen from Market Street. Our plan
proposes saving as many of those large trees as possible to set the most dense portion of
our plan, the apartments, into a tree canopy. This unique setting allows us to preserve the
character of the site and neighborhood while transitioning down to a traditional single -
family neighborhood. The majority of the land is or has been used as farm land and provides
a good, open area in the rear of the property as is required for the single family homesites
proposed.
The applicant, Logan Developers, Inc. presents this project request to you as one that is in
keeping with the goals and policies of the Future Land Use plan and as a project, that we
feel, honors the natural site characteristics while acting as a transition project to the
surrounding townhomes, duplexes, and single family homes in the vicinity of this project.
2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3
P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 11
Page 2 of 2
During the process, the development team has listened to concerns and comments form
residents within the Porters Neck community. We have made many changes, best
summarized in the community meeting summary, and attempted to compromise with the
neighbors to alleviate traffic and stormwater concerns and limit density beyond the initial
plans. We recognize this is a project that infills one of the last undeveloped properties in the
Porters Neck area, and we also understand the comments from neighbors to keep the
current community as it is now. However, our development team strongly feels this is a
project worthy of fitting into the Porters Neck community. We present this project for the
consideration of planning staff and New Hanover County Boards to determine if this project
is a suitable conditional rezoning for an area of the County noted as community mixed
use /general residential and as a growth node as indicated by the County's adopted Future
Land Use Plan, as a project cohesively designed as a transition from higher density,
commercial corridor of Market Street back to the traditional single family neighborhoods of
Porters Neck.
Thank you for your consideration of the conditional rezoning request.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 12
PARAMOUNTE
E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C,
Upol ID: D ❑m❑ ❑ ❑r 13, 2019
Upol tl I: N❑ELI❑ ❑ ❑r 18, 2019
Date: October 10, 2019
Updated Submittal 12/13/19:
The updated submittal reduces overall density on the site from the original 406 units down
to 324 (228 apartments, 34 duplex, 62 single family). This reduces the proposed density
from 7.75 units /acre to 6.18 units /acre. We discussed options for plan alterations with
those willing to discuss changes to the plan. A certain portion of the community was willing
entertain a proposal that pulled apartments further away from the Vineyard Plantation
homes and removed the third floor of the apartments. The newly revised plan does just that
—takes 6 of the 12 apartment buildings down to 2 stories and leaves 3 story buildings only in
the areas adjacent to vacant land. We received one request to move the pool and clubhouse
away from nearby homes, so we also accommodated this by pulling it into open space areas
more internally located than on the edge near existing homes. We also reduced the overall
apartment count from the most recent proposal of 288 to the current proposal of 228 units
(a drop of 60units). We also added both dedicated open space and undeveloped or
landscape areas. The applicant's previously proposed conditions remain current in this
proposal.
We recognize that we cannot make every neighbor happy with this proposal, but we are
presenting this plan in a good -faith effort to respond to and compromise with the
community. We respectfully submit this plan to you for consideration of the conditional
rezoning as presented in the plans and associated documents.
Previously Submitted Information:
The Oaks at Murrav Farm Conditional Zoning Suaalemental Information
Proposed Conditions:
Beyond the existing requirements of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance, the
proposed for the initial 10/10/19 submittal mixed residential project proposes to save many
of the large character trees in an effort to both preserve the site's character and to help
buffer the larger apartment buildings on site. In addition, the applicant proposing pulling
most buildings away from property lines to further buffer the proposed development from
the neighboring properties.
The updated conditions proposed for the conditional rezoning are as follows and as a direct
result of community meeting concerns:
1. Revise stormwater design to achieve 100 year storm instead of meeting the minimum 25
year storm. This is achievable in part because of the excellent soils data obtained since the
first community meeting and in part because the wetland area of the site was not nearly as
much land area once an on -site analysis was completed.
2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3
P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 13
Page 2 of 3
2. To alleviate traffic concerns, the applicant proposes to design and construct an additional
right turn lane at Futch Creek Road. and Hwy 17 /Market intersection if NCDOT /WMPO allow
this measure to be completed. After our traffic consultant ran various scenarios at all
intersection near the project site, the improvement that made the most impact was this
intersection. The current understanding is that the Futch Creek traffic light queuing will be
cut nearly in half by addition of a right turn lane. The design will have to be coordinated with
the two entities to assure initial design meets their future plans and does not conflict with
their understanding of the movement through the intersection. As such, the applicant
proposes to pursue this right turn lane improvement with all the necessary decision makers
including the County, WMPO, and NCDOT.
Consideration of a Conditional Zoning District - Criteria:
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and
development?
The subject property is located in a growth node just off of Market Street, in an area slated
for intensive development such as shopping centers and commercial services. The design of
the project proposes placing the most intensive use, the apartments, near the front of the
site and in the growth node area. This type of use will be most intense, but the design also
promotes another policy to conserve natural resources, such as the large trees designated to
be saved at the front of the site. The single family and duplex portions of the design are in
keeping with the existing fabric of the neighborhood and align with the Future Land Use
Plan.
2. How would the requested conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's
classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan?
As mentioned above, the requested zoning and layout of the design nicely aligns with the
Future Land Use Map. The apartments end nearly right on top of the division of Community
Mixed Use, an acceptable use for this designation, and the single family and duplexes fall
within the general residential designated portion of the site.
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning
inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the
existing zoning?
The existing zoning reflects a less intensive land use than Future Land Use Plan projects for
this commercial corridor along Market Street. The proposed single family and duplex areas
are allowable under the existing zonings as performance residential; however the rezoning
to RMF -L allows apartments and more intensive mixed use residential projects to be
constructed whereas the current zoning does not. This project does propose higher than the
2.5 units / acre allowed by the by -right performance residential. Our proposed 7.4 units to
the acre places the bulk of that density in the apartments, the area of the site slated for
community mixed -use. While the proposed zoning district allows for 10 units to the acre, it
is really the combination of higher density and mixture of uses that allows the project to be
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 14
Page 3 of 3
built in keeping with the County's plans for this region of the County. RMF -L allows the
project to blend a mixture of residential housing types that specifically fit the Future Land
Use Plan in this area of the County.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 15
JC MORGAN
REAL ESIAIE VALUXI ION I REVIEW I CONSULTING:;
December 1, 2019
New Hanover County
230 Government Center Drive - Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Rezoning; Conditional Zoning District
Case Number Z19 -14
Logan Developers, Inc.
52.39 Acres; The Oaks at Murray Farm (Proposed)
New Hanover County, NC
JC Morgan Company is a real estate appraisal and consulting firm in Wilmington, NC. Since 2010, our
firm has appraised and consulted on hundreds of properties in and around the Wilmington area. The
property types we appraise and provide consulting services for include residential, land, retail, office,
industrial, subdivisions and mixed -use. Our client base consists of real estate owners, developers,
financial institutions, local and federal governments and related agencies, attorneys, utility companies
and airport authorities.
I was recently engaged by the applicant to perform research and analysis that would enable me to
conclude an opinion of whether the proposed project would have any impact on the adjacent and
surrounding properties.
As I understand it, The Oaks at Murray Farm is a proposed residential development to be located on
52.39 acres in the Porters Neck area of New Hanover County. The development will contain single
family residences on the east end of the project, duplex style residential properties located in the middle
section of the development and luxury garden style residential apartments on the west side of the
project. The development appears to meet or exceed market standards for overall design, buffers,
aesthetics and product pricing.
As the immediate area already consists of small lot SFR residential development, duplex -style residential
development and traditional SFR residential development, the project's proposed single family
development (east side of the project) and the duplex style residential dwellings (middle section of the
project) are considered to be consistent with existing land uses in the immediate area and will have no
negative impact on adjacent or surrounding property values. In fact, the market prices of the proposed
single family and duplex style residential dwellings will likely be higher than many of the surrounding
property values, potentially increasing the average market value of homes in the area. This trend of new
home product pricing extending beyond the values of the existing housing stock in the immediate area
remains consistent throughout New Hanover and surrounding counties.
Lumina Station
1904 Easm,00d Road - Suite 305 - Wilmington, NC • 28403
PO Box 481 • lVrightss -ille Beach. NC • 6;,480
Tel: 910 - 256 -2920 • Fax: 888 - 819 -8258
www.jcmorganco.com
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 16
The west side of the proposed project will consist of a luxury garden style residential apartment
complex. As with most newly developed apartment communities in their respective markets, the
proposed apartments should command some of the highest rents in the sub - market, attracting tenants
with higher income levels and those who 'lease by choice'.
To develop an opinion as to whether the proposed apartments would have any Impact on adjacentor
surrounding property values, I have taken the following steps:
1. I performed a review of several apartment communities in the Wilmington market, and more
particularly in the property's immediate sub - market, to determine the impact, if any, these
apartment communities had on adjacent and surrounding property values, Some of the
communities I reviewed included:
• Amberleigh Shores
• Hawthorne at the Station /Lucia Point
• Headwaters at Autumn Hall
• Tesla Park
• St. Andrews Place, Reserve
• Bellingham Park (Condominiums)
Whenever the data allowed, I compared SFR properties that abutted the apartment communities to
SFR properties that did not, to determine if there was any quantifiable impact on property values. In
several cases, over 10 years of data was reviewed. During my research, I found no indication that the
properties abutting the adjacent apartment communities had any impact (positive of negative) on
value.
2. Discussions with market participants is a common method to get a feel of how the market perceives
various issues. For this assignment, I spoke with several market participants about the impact the
proposed development could have on the adjoining or surrounding properties. I spoke with several
market participants active in the local real estate market (residential real estate brokers and
appraisers). All indicated that the proposed project would likely have no impact on the real estate
values of adjoining or surrounding properties. In fact, several indicated that a SFR dwelling that
backs up to an adequate buffer of a luxury apartment community would be preferable to one
backing up to another SFR dwelling.
Summary
Based on my research and review of market sales data, I found no evidence that the proposed project
would have any negative impact on the property values of the adjacent or surrounding properties
Furthermore, due to the growth of the immediate area over the past several years, which includes
apartment communities, hotels, new retail centers, restaurants and increasing residential densities, the
property is considered an infill site. Within the market area, comparable infill sites have been developed
with mixed uses, generally consisting of commercial or multi - family land uses located at the front of the
development and single - family land uses located at the rear of the developments.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 17
This transition of land uses is preferred by New Hanover County, as noted in the NHC Future Land Use
Plan, as well as other municipalities in North Carolina. The proposed project is consistent with the
recommended uses of the Community .'Aired Use place type and is consistent with current and preferred
development trends for comparable locations.
Should you have any questions, or want to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
= 1� ==
Jack C. (Cal) Morgan, III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS
JC Morgan Company
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 18
PARAMOUNTE
E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C.
October 11, 2019
19305.PE
Various Parcels in Porters Neck
New Hanover County, North Carolin
60 Gregory Rd., Suite 1
Belville, NC 28451
ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being various tracts or parcels of land in Harnett Township, New Hanover County, North Carolina, being
located on the southeastern side of Market street and U.S. Highway 17 consisting of New Hanover
County tax records parcels R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 -007-
000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 -003 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
and R02900- 004 - 019 -000 being more particularly described as follows.
Point of beginning being the northern most corner of R02900- 004 - 007 -000, 8390 Market street on
the southern margin of Market street thence South 49 °15'00" East a distance of 160.00' to a point;
Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street South 48 °52'51" East a
distance of 112.94' to a point;
Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 009 -000 8376 Market street the following five (5)
course and distances;
South 48 °34'30" East a distance of 645.43' to a point;
South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 551.15' to a point;
South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 505.00' to a point;
South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 453.92' to a point;
South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 100.00' to a point;
Thence with the northern boundary of R03700- 001 - 007 -000 8380 Market street the following six (6)
course and distances;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 612.12' to a point;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 192.62' to a point;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 434.02' to a point;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 272.19' to a point;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 264.19' to a point;
South 48 °20'15"
East a distance of 118.03' to a point;
1 22 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T O N , NO 2 B 4❑ 3
F H: (9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 6 7 p 7 F A l 9 7 9 1 . 6 7 6
BoarJoFCommissioners - February A, 1b�
ITEM: 10- 8 - 19
Thence with the northern and eastern R03700- 001 - 006 -000 8313 Shiraz way the following two (2) course
and distances;
Thence South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 174.97' to a point;
Thence South 40 °29'15" West a distance of 266.25' to a point;
Thence with the eastern and southern of R03700- 001 - 002 -000 817 Porters Neck road the following six (6)
course and distances;
South 33 °53'14"
West
North 77 °36'20"
West
North 12 °32'57"
East
North 44 °45'48"
West
South 84 °04'42"
West
North 48 °00'48"
West
a distance of 226.29' to a point;
a distance of 195.59' to a point;
a distance of 156.21' to a point;
a distance of 635.91' to an STONE "N';
a distance of 207.34' to a point;
a distance of 430.32' to a point;
Thence with the southern boundary of R03700- 001 - 003 -000 817 Porters Neck road North 48 °00'48"
West a distance of 500.57' to a point;
Thence around R03700- 001 - 003 - 001499 Tibbys drive the following three (3) course and distances;
North 41 °27'48" East a distance of 285.38' to a point;
North 48 °29'24" West a distance of 500.56' to a point;
South 41 °00'57" West a distance of 279.00' to a point;
Thence with the southern boundary of R02900- 004 -010 -000 421 Tibbys drive the following four (4)
course and distances to the southern margin of said Market street;
North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 935.83' to a point;
North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 999.80' to a point;
Thence North 42 °02'57" East a distance of 75.35' to a point;
Thence North 48 702'55" West a distance of 252.66' to a point;
Thence with the southeastern Market street right of way by old deeds with R02900- 004 - 010 -000 421
Tibby drive, R02900- 004 - 010 - 0018362 Market street, R02900- 004 - 019 -000 8370 Market street, R02900-
004- 009 -000 8376 Market street, R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street, and R02900- 004 - 007 -000 8390
Market street the following three (3) course and distances;
North 42 °45'04" East a distance of 109.15' to a point;
North 42 °13'46" East a distance of 288.18' to a point;
North 42 °10'00" East a distance of 60.00' to a point which is the point of beginning.
Having an area of 2,287,089 Sq. Ft. or 52.5 Acres more or less as computed by deeds. EXCEPTING from
such a 6x10 plot around the "Lewis Buxton" grave site and lands claimed by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation.
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M 1 N G T O N, N C 2 8 4 0 3
P H: (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A (9 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 11
Board of Commissioners - 4ebruar`y �O�O
ITEM: 10- 8 - 20
PARAMOUNTE
E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C,
Upd ❑t Ed: N -EZE I -_:_- 12, 2019
Date: September 30, 2019
The Oaks at Murray Farm Community Meetings Summary
The Oaks at Murray Farm has conducted multiple meetings with the Porters Neck
community. A brief summary is listed below with detail summary provided at the end.
Community Meeting #1 was held on September 30, 2019 with a 400 -450 person attendance.
Because of the large group and the concern over the project, the development team listened
to comments and asked for community representatives to continue to meet with us to refine
the plans.
Some of the residents agreed to one meeting held on November 8th, 2019 and included
many community HOA presidents and representatives meeting to discuss the plan revised to
address many of their concerns including adding buffers, open space, saving a large,
significant trees, especially in the apartment portion of the plan to further screen
apartments and work the plan into the existing site, reducing the number of apartments
(eliminated 2 buildings), pulling the apartment buildings further away from neighboring
properties, adding emergency services access -only gates to the Vineyard Plantation road
connections to reduce traffic concerns in their neighborhood, agreeing to provide
stormwater well in excess of the County's 25 year storm (to provide for the 100 year storm),
and to agree to build a turn lane (that is not otherwise a required by the TIA) from Futch
Creek to Hwy 17 to alleviate traffic concerns in the area. At the end of this HOA
representative meeting, the representatives refused to meet with the development team
again stating that we were not addressing their concerns and we would have to agree to
disagree. They refused to accept any plans with apartments on the plan.
Community Meeting #2 was held on November 12th, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex
Auditorium. Given the large number of folks attending the first meeting, we searched for a
venue that would agree to allow us to host a meeting with 500 people. After three weeks of
searching for a venue that was relatively close to the project site, had free parking for the
community, could house the amount of residents interested in the project, and would agree
to host a development project meeting, we found the Hampstead Annex Auditorium. It was
only capable of housing approximately 250 people at one time, so we divided the meeting
into two groups. Those living to the north were asked to attend the first meeting. Those
living to the south /east of the project site were asked to attend the second meeting. The
majority of questions received at these two meetings were about traffic and concerns over
apartments near their homes. Some folks were also concerned about school overcrowding.
Full details for the two community meetings are provided below.
2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3
P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 21
Page 2 of 5
To date, we continue to talk with residents both for and against the project. The
development team continues to address as many concerns as is possible to demonstrate
that they do want to be good neighbors, but that the developer is proposing a project that
does include apartments.
The Oaks at Murray Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 1 Notes:
Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held a community meeting at Anchor
Baptist Church on Futch Creek Rd. from 6:00 -7:00 PM on September 30, 2019.
Approximately 400 -450 residents attended the meeting to listen to a presentation of the
project and offer comments on the developer's proposal.
- Check on school capacity at Porters Neck School (Answer: We will reach out to the NHC
Schools folks to discuss)
- Because of drought conditions and restriction on irrigation needs, does this cause future
water supply issues (Answer: We have not evaluated irrigation at this time, but if water
capacity is available, CFPUA will advise throughout the project's development.)
- Would like gates on side roads (Answer: We will investigate with our traffic consultant)
Will the existing ditches be left open for stormwater flow (Answer: Existing streams will be
left open in all plans to date, on -going analysis of stormwater will help us further develop the
entire plan)
- Price point of units (Answer: Luxury Apartments is target market, prices will vary based on
market conditions, but anticipated at $1100 +/ mo)
- Will apartments be Section 8 apartments (Answer: no)
- People expressed approval of the duplex /single family portion of the development, especially
if Logan is the developer, but they are unhappy with the apartments proposed largely due to
traffic concerns. (Answer: we are looking at the detailed traffic analysis for the whole project,
but we hear the concerns about apartments. We will evaluation the plan and make changes
if the developer chooses to do so)
- Several people told us to put apartments on the other side of Market Street — it was better
land for that. (It is understood that many residents have expressed interest in not having
apartments near their homes, however, the future land use plan does identify the area as a
growth node for shopping center and denser development. The apartments are clustered in
that higher density portion of the site as identified in the FLUP)
- Will buffer /vegetation be kept for the existing properties (Yes, to the greatest extent possible
and augmented as needed)
- Traffic concerns along /at round about on Porters Neck Road (Answer: We will look at both
Porters Neck Road and Futch Creek Rd. for any improvements that may alleviate concerns.
After the meeting, the traffic consultant conducted a series of studies looking at the
roundabout on Porters Neck Road, the Intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street
and at Futch Creek Rd /Market(HWY 17) intersection. Due to current NCDOT bypass projects
and the associated anticipated effects on Porters Neck/ Market intersection and due to
constricted land area and the fact that Porters Neck Road is reported to operate at a Level of
Service A (the best rating) even after the proposed project is built, Futch Creek Road was the
only improvement that could alleviate traffic in any significant way. This is explained in
Meeting #2 summary.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 22
Page 3 of 5
- Status of Traffic Study (Answer: submitted, not approved time of Meeting #1)
- Phasing of project (Answer: Anticipated build out in 2023 used in traffic report, phasing not
determined at this time)
- Making sure apartments are for rent (Answer: yes)
- The neighbors expressed concern about the amount of traffic this project could cause
(Answer: see detailed explanation above)
- When the group broke into smaller groups looking at the plans, many people were
appreciative of the information, but wanted to talk further with Logan to better understand
the product proposed and the overall ramifications to their neighborhoods. (Many folks
talked with the development team through phone and email after the meeting)
POST MEETING #1 CORRESPONDENCE:
After the meeting, the developer had many calls for residents, some now in support of the
project. The team has on -going efforts to get information out to residents.
POST MEETING #1 CHANGES:
After hearing many of the comments, there were changes made to reduce apartment units
by nearly 10% and to pull apartments away from the borders. The total unit count was
reduced, open space gathered toward the center of the project, refined stormwater to
reflect neighbor concerns and site conditions and now accounts for the 100 year storm, and
save many large trees on the site.
The Oaks at MurraV Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 2 Notes:
Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held two community meetings on the
same night at Hampstead Annex Auditorium on Hwy 17. The first meeting for residents to
the north of the site occurred from 5:30 -6:30 PM. The second meeting for residents to the
south /east of the site occurred from 7:00 -8:00 PM on November 12, 2019. As mentioned in
the meeting summary, we wanted to accommodate at least as many folks as attended our
first community meeting, but the closest largest venue suitable for the crowd only held 250
people, so we divided the meeting to hear from everyone. The first of the two meetings had
approximately 180 people in attendance and the second meeting was a mixture of people
staying from the first meeting and new attendees. This second meeting had 80 people.
The attached agenda covers the presentation from the development team to the
participants. Then the floor was opened to questions and comments. The following is a
summary of that community input:
- Schools are overcrowded and traffic to those schools is congested (Answer: The developer
has a meeting set with NHC Schools folks to discuss, but the traffic consultant, Ramey Kemp,
addressed school traffic. Much of the traffic comments related to late busses and not enough
bus drivers )
Porters Neck Road traffic will be made worse by apartments/ this project (Answer:
Traffic Analysis shows Porters Neck Road is currently a Level of Service A road since
the roundabout construction and that after the proposed project is built (using the
previously proposed plan with 406 units instead of the current, reduced plan), the
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 23
Page 4 of 5
roundabout will experience a 1 second delay from current conditions at peak hour.
And the Porters Neck /Market intersection will add approximately 2 cars at peak hour.
However, after the Military Cutoff bypass is complete (anticipated 2022 prior to this
project build out), approximately 9,000 cars / day are anticipated to be routed away
from this intersection at Porters Neck Road. The intersection after bypass
construction is anticipated to operate in quicker movements from either pre or post
project development.
Stormwater designed to the 100 year storm is not enough (Answer: The stormwater
in previous plans has been further evaluated, soil testing has now been performed,
and we confirmed we can provide a stormwater design in excess of the County's 25
year requirement. We understand there are concerns from neighbors and have
offered a solution that should improve the situation well beyond the minimum
requirements).
Emergency Services response times were reported at 12 -25 minutes both at this
meeting and Meeting #1. (Answer: We heard this at the first meeting and this one,
Paramounte Engineering spoke with Fire Marshal David Stone to determine if there
was a problem in this area that we are not aware of, if this project can be designed in
a way to alleviate any concerns, and if there is something off -site the developer may
be able to offer or assist with to help alleviate any concerns. Mr. Stone stated the
Porters Neck Communities are served at the some rate as others in the county with
fire's first responder typical response times in the 4 -7 minute range and EMS or law
enforcement in the 9 minute range. Mr. Stone stated that the fire station existing
across from the Shiraz Way entrance of this development would promote one
alternate route through the neighborhood for fire and EMS to travel from this station
if traffic on Porters Neck Road is impassible, especially since speed bumps are not
proposed in our neighborhood. Regarding off -site improvements, Mr. Stone
reiterated NCDOT and our traffic consultant in saying that there is not room to widen
Porters Neck Road, so no off -site improvement, such as adding a lane, are really
possible without taking property from homes along Porters Neck Road.
Futch Creek proposed extra turn lane will not fix the traffic problem. An extra right
turn lane will not help since the majority of traffic comes out of this intersection and
goes to the Uturn to head towards Wilmington. The extra lane will not be used
(Answer: Our traffic consultant presented the findings that the intersection queuing
time could be nearly cut in half with the addition of a right turn lane, and the extra
lane would allow everyone (after the project is built) to cycle through the intersection
in 1 light cycle. He further stated that this is a proposal to the community first to add
an additional turn lane. If accepted, it would be reviewed by NCDOT and WMPO.
They may have comments, want changes, corroborate with the neighbors stated
regarding amount of Uturn activity, etc. However, this has not been addressed with
NCDOT at this time. If it is desired, the developer is agreeing to pursue this turn lane
as a way to help the community. If it is not desired, we do not need to pursue the
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 24
Page 5 of 5
additional turn lane. To date, there has been no requirement from the TIA for the
additional turn lane or any other improvement off -site.
- There was a death at this intersection recently, this development will bring more
accidents and fatalities. (Answer: Ramey Kemp submitted TIA prior to the recent
fatality, so that report did not take that into account. However, the consultant
responded that he would follow up with NCDOT after the meeting since a fatality
triggers a review of the intersection and what could be done to make the situation
better. Those findings will be coordinated and addressed in any improvements that
happen at that intersection.
- There were many comments questioning the validity and methods of the traffic
report. Statistics used in the report were questioned. Traffic counts were
questioned. The method of traffic analysis was questioned. There was mention of
another traffic consultant hired by Vineyard Plantation who had an alternate report
contradicting Ramey Kemp's findings. (Response: Ramey Kemp's traffic consultant
explained accepted methodologies and how he arrived at each of the questioned
statistics. He further explained that the counts were performed over a 48 hour period
in a time designated by NCDOT/WMPO scoping meeting (while school was in session).
The means and methods of the study have been approved by NCDOT/WMPO. At the
time of the community meeting, those two entities are reviewing the findings of the
TIA before issuing comments on potential improvements.
- Apartments are not wanted here — Logan builds nice single family homes. Build
those, can't we propose all duplex and single family that would not be met with
opposition. What kind of apartments will they be, what price point?
(Response: We have heard this statement, and we are presenting a plan with
apartments, but with many concessions to prove that Logan does want to build a nice
neighborhood that works with the community. The Logan team evaluated the site for
single family and duplexes, and the price of the land prevents the developer from
considering single family and duplexes only as an alternative. Furthermore, Logan is
planning luxury apartments on the high end geared toward one of the fastest
growing market, 62+ looking for rentals. The developer feels this project targets that
market and fits well into the Porters Neck Community.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 25
Mo luting DI-to: NEDDE ❑IJ 12, 2019
T❑❑ ❑ 1111❑ ❑ ❑M ❑rr❑❑ ❑EI-❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 1111 ❑-❑❑ M ❑❑FIM❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑d ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 1111❑❑❑
General Note: Two meetings will be held this evening. Both meetings will follow the format and general meeting
guidelines as follows. We ask that you abide by these guidelines so participants have a chance to hear the presentation
and to ask questions.
Meeting 1 from 5:30 -6:30 PM will be held for residents living to the north of the project site. We ask you to exit the building from
6:30 -6:45 so the meeting 2 participants can enter between 6:45 -7:00. The time for exiting will be signaled by the lights flicking on
and off. If you refuse to leave, you will be preventing the next group of your neighbors from participating.
Meeting 2 from 7:00 — 8:00 PM will be held for residents living to the south /east of the project site. We ask you to exit the building
no later than 8:30 PM.
Notes from the building manager and development team:
o Please do not bring food or drink into the auditorium
• The auditorium's building occupancy is approximately 250 people, so we recommend you appoint representatives
to attend the meeting in the event attendance exceeds occupancy. This agenda acts as a presentation summary in
the event you are unable to attend either meeting.
• Doors will be monitored and locked to ingress travel when the building reaches capacity
• All doors remain open to egress travel at all times
• In the event of emergency, exits are located in the center, front of the building and at each end of the first floor
hall.
Meeting Agenda & Discussion Points:
1. Introduction
2. Presentation Items will Include:
Summary of changes from the 1St community meeting plan to the current plan
• Reduced apartment unit count by approx. 10% by removing (2) 12 unit apartment buildings
• Increased single family homes by 8 units
• Removed 1 duplex building (2 units)
• Less overall density
o (9/30/19 community meeting plan had 406 total units, current plan has 388 total units)
• Pulled apartments towards center of site to further buffer adjacent properties
• Added neighborhood parks, open space, and increased buffers
• Saved large trees on site- located primarily at Old Market Street
• New stormwater design with increased capacity from County's required 25 year storm event to 100 year storm event
• Developer is proposing to construct an off -site traffic improvement to alleviate some traffic concerns (this is not part of
the recommendations included in the Traffic Impact Analysis, this is offered in direct response to public input received
at the last community meeting). All scenarios below represent the full buildout condition.
o Add 1 right turn lane on Futch Creek at the Market Street /Hwy 17 traffic light.
• After this proposed project is built, queuing time at traffic light reduces from 42 seconds to 27 seconds
• This results in all traffic clearing the light in one cycle
• The existing Porters Neck Rd. roundabout delay is increased by 1 second at the peak traffic hours
• The existing Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection delay increases by 2 seconds (1 -2 extra cars added to
queuing
• After the Military Cutoff portion of the bypass is constructed (anticipated completion in mid - summer 2022),
traffic along Market Street (US 17) is expected to be approximately 20% less (removing approximately 9,000
cars from passing through the intersection at Porters Neck Rd /Market).
• Resulting signal adjustments at Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection are anticipated to lessen wait
time at the intersection from the existing conditions (including this proposed project build out).
• The current 2022 completion happens before The Oaks at Murray Farm will be built out (projected
2023 or later).
3. Discussion - If you have additional comments or questions beyond the meeting, please visit the "contact"
portion of the project website at www.oaksatmurrayfarm.com
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 26
PARAMOUNTE
N C:� I N E E R I M G. I M �_
October 31, 2019
RE: Second Community Meeting for:
Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm
Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. invite you to a second community meeting on Tuesday,
November 12, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. After having conversations with various members of
the community since our last meeting, we have received feedback, and we want to compile the interested parties
again to present our revised plans and current information to the larger community group(s).
Because there was such a large group of community members in attendance in our first meeting, we looked for a
meeting venue both close to your homes and one that can hold large groups. We have reserved the closest, large
venue that agreed to host our community meeting. However, the Hampstead Annex is only able to hold 230 seated
people at one time and about 250 people with some standing. (The latter is very close to the auditorium's building
occupancy limit for fire safety). We want to be sure everyone has an opportunity to attend, so we will be holding
two community meetings back to back to accommodate anyone interested in the project. In order to meet the
venue's fire safety requirements, we respectfully ask you to comply with the following:
If you live to the north of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30.
If you live to the east or south of the proposed project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00.
If you do not know which group you fall into, please refer to the enclosed plan's north arrow and vicinity map to
determine direction of you home in relation to the project site.
Please understand that the auditorium's doors will be closed if we reach capacity. We recommend that homeowners'
associations and large common - interest groups appoint representatives to attend their respective meeting so those
people can get the information out to the larger community in the event we reach the venue's fire safety capacity.
The subject tracts of land remain the same as the land you saw in the last meeting. That includes the ± 51.39 acre
tract of land bordered by Old Market St., Tibbys Dr., and Shiraz Way and is further identified as New Hanover
County Parcels: R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R02900-
004- 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R02900- 004- 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, and R02900-
004- 010 -000
Since our last community meeting, we have submitted a conditional rezoning application to New Hanover County,
but we are continuing to work through questions and comments from the community before finalizing our proposed
conditional rezoning plan and setting the Planning Board meeting date.
Please reference the enclosed current conditional rezoning plan and join us on the 12th for a look at larger scale
plans. Our development team will be on hand to answer questions and discuss the project with neighbors.
Community members who live north of the proposed project site, please attend the first
meeting from 5:30 -6:30.
Community members who live east or south of the proposed project site, please attend
the first meeting from 7:00 -8:00.
When: November 12, 2019
Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium
15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443
I ❑EIDEMA DR ®E
M
Board of ComrAi_o_-MwuR3::Pl=etH1Uary 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 27
-L -f- r
v
1-= N C-:; 1 N E E F2 I N G I N C: _
October 31, 2019
RE: Second Community Meeting for:
Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm — REVISED SITE PLAN
Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. recently sent you an invitation to our second
community meeting. In that invitation mailing, you received a copy of the first community meeting plan for
reference. This mailing provides you a copy of the revised plan to be discussed at the November 12, 2019
community meeting at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. We are providing you both plans in advance of
the meeting so you can see what has changed including reduction in units, saving the site's stately trees and
stormwater adjustments. We also have included new park and open spaces areas all while adding additional
buffers from adjacent properties to the site. Please join us to hear full details on the 12th.
Just a reminder on meeting times:
Community members who live to the north or northeast of the proposed project site, please attend
the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30.
Community members who live to the east /southeast, south, or west /southwest of the proposed
project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00.
When: November 12, 2019
Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium
15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443
❑77 ❑ TIVEMA DRIDE
❑ EE[VIE10DDDO Ell ❑
Pn: --U-L1 I I I I I
Board of Commilsioners + iFebruary 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 28
Qninmunb Megu�§ i ar C Ei�� i1 i €arid Ei s�nin� } c' u t i Icy an i7 +el+ i r5. Lnc_
PMO ca N amp: TI7E A f'Rwrric4p[s_ -al PorteF -s Ckdks The F�ese� aye gl" !'�i1e�
Na me
Pro ,4,ddrmq f Neigh hicor}w(A
Plane Number
5 nna it Addr •
1
_
a
p
,vv d'#
}
IF-
,.
irevIP&P4
XG1057 , LAAJ -rlM-r aP QW&JU61 6^
gin - 3f4)- -7-f,3
Aasd�O -%P rrms),L
�A
131- 3
m
1 IL
-
9 1 —023 149
Wa466
X jjrrjj j p L
1-0 57. Obt
lip I
JC
7
0
Vol
-'
-
—' ''
fry r ►� r*
I�
,
Ej
,c
Ipw
A .€ L-'
' _
J
it Ar
F C
.knchur :BMAhYl U LLIrch
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 29 ° nnbcrYWL ZD19
b-00 P.M
Name Address Phan ## Email
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 30
Community Mgctiny rnr -C padilional R nning Rce iics] t�E Lai-An Ykvgl N, Ins
Project flame = 'l`h.c A rja cv s, a1 PmbrTs Oalas T'hr Resme at P-arteg Oaks
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 LL +55
lSap lfil (:hpren ITEM: 10- 8 - 31 L�SLLl11�ILT� }III, LC�I 60D P_M
ca,-"
r)
J"
VU (No;9
F � c�e-
e( cs 0
ftj.Ue 'Lr *f :garm
F
, ,yam y y7 t +s
rE - .� R -�t4�` Imo'# c41 -4r d,
(L Y�-rr,PLj ; if
Leo S K qtr A 4.0 LIC1,4 y
0
0
- L(
Ly
- rr
J l qqD
�€5 say-] ti l l =Q5irN I
AM
AMY IP
a
-i"
Lo
r , n_ cam.
C,ts C e.
,f or.c:i',�i
�. u
q La
-t, r4y-.i VI /160 Ir
.�
Name Address Phone# Email
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 33
M, a MO s
0711M �Wok 0450 ?
i
v
10 :lr,,rlal Rc�ej,tt pg Rpqupgr by T xVo Dr°wolI, Ins:.
+-
f
I
s�
f
pW
III SA
1
WO M
*
P
t d �
r+
10�
°1
KPIR Mn 2r. ME
ML
a . i` , f
r
-
-
.
r.
� •' , � ate, �-
Board of Commissioners - FebruarV 3, 2020
f
I
s�
f
pW
III SA
1
WO M
(�(%% �
Proim-t Nuw.: Tfic Apja•i gt-q at P-Ofters Ook The 9 Q-X. poners Ouk�%
fFnL -
r
)Aj
ess
F
ekia-,r-, VAI
rt4q Dekwa
dab
2 I
r
Mank
-
C24-
Ale, -)Oolan-e4
- -
'S 3
A tv 4
Wz 4
-.T 9QZ24
- Z3 I%X—V 4A Ww,-%
-Z af, Y ni
kdf-� 171
l77 -rL
twcn,
iv-na Ofm
Le
ja
Board of Commissione s February 3, 2020 ELVIL
Aiwlwr bapdsi u-1humh ITEM: 10- 8 - 35
APW
J-b�p
6;1)0 PA
0� c6;iLST
CQTPFPkLDj SY, Mea-cin undijonal Rerxm ng "LLest D 1401 wgjpc7s. Inc.
+ - ' � NS111t *: The p2rirfi�al:+ -at T'erdm (inks 'the }�e�e ye a1 briers O k ;
7"Ir
gtt o -pouf
ye
Ian ;NOZ
3 Q.
c-",
qOq
r
I-I'E E•F a- -3 4 � 5921 C r, L _r- r .
kl s v
_
,,P+:
--
,i1-1-
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
Rnclix BVdtL ICbLffcl ITEM: 10- 8 - 36 Septcmtcr H li. 2019
rx �
9.-
f q ii r r7
61.00 RM
4
c�muni Pwl[�► Zc�nql
il N)nal Re L�Xti
ng Jqul b[,n7,
E'roiec[ Nanh - Tt APijrtm.
its a= Ylcir�ers
Oaks The gcr�r Ott '[}al€�
a n
Pro Addren } N�" U
' borhood
Mine Number
EmaM Add rem
f
F47
Jl
dq
e:e3
J-�6
-
; F'.FaLs3i� II ThIf.4�
-Y
re
, , i
`{
-
}l �"
-
I e P r r
}y' 6 � 6r
yy
L1J s 4 it W
i Sf 5 ' i e6
1
� w 'iL J
fj�1 f
j
y
-Cot 0
Jw
.�1p,Rtf� f
pf
,j1J d
0 �,I�5''y
1 De Hy
ro�
� ' • +
f
iJ '
- _
ep
72"',
J e ZZA LzA 44r
T ° ' i ,r F
�8
.c-l-LA
Wgry
K
•
-- .. • �1 ll•
— s hd —zi
AriL6W MIDI iSt ( hl"
Board of Commissioners -
ITEM: 10- 8
February 33.. 2020 ac }� +�
- 37 7��
6.-W P.M
Name Address Phone# Email
_
...... ....�4
z
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 38
Name Address PhonAlt r-mmi1
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 39
Name Address Phone# Email
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 40
Name Add rp- c. -r. DkAmin4# r--a - as
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 41
on
Name Address Phinntm rM_%;I
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 42
Amfxir Sup ;mL CNILRUIi
.i il t7ui7.i Twl ire tier C'�ndiLulFL�,1 F n nj..R- c_gucsL by . can Mi vcCamm Inc.
Pr coiucl N 3111C- ` FLO a wnents gi Pcwtc O;sk.% 'Tlle Boogie of Portm Oaks.
�
r {�
s fM s
tea, �J
�`1 .
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 43 pieoir:a�r _�y�l . 211 I
N0O P.M
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
AFWIK,r BLupiil ('n arch ITEM: 10- 8 - 44 -Lwher y Xh. 2019 6-D] P-M
il I, .
IL
,
ilk
++ P
FAW
■
/ t
e
e
�
MMEM� +
FF
r!!p
3J
Ii d
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
AFWIK,r BLupiil ('n arch ITEM: 10- 8 - 44 -Lwher y Xh. 2019 6-D] P-M
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 45
I "V
Cs,-L
��-p E
GO
Ir
UO M�g
Wj
Prig mt Name- The Martmcm art ftrters Oaks The Rcscr-c at Pan-ers Oaks
Na jw Pn-Lyperiv AdArcm I , Nciehhnirbo-nd
Pkame No-Inbrir
Email Addrem
Board of Commissioners- February 3, 2020
Arichor I Church ITEM: 10- 8 - 46 vl)� 2319
- .9
bpl
?.LL71�
,� a0k-
6-W P.M
j
sg:, -4nw
.8112,-Cf�t
L-131L Mw A
2
C oo
-a
f Ow6e, vic- I
e 1
4
(4- rq.4.v4, Ltj Le,
C.1 q
n och L3
49
d
46�7
r,
0)
—Jr
z Lie%
%C%67lrL9l) L
s�7�
lu L
Board of Commissioners- February 3, 2020
Arichor I Church ITEM: 10- 8 - 46 vl)� 2319
- .9
bpl
?.LL71�
,� a0k-
6-W P.M
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 47
6 �
a' �,
I
I
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 48
II
17
.73.
I
eoffi
r
LSZ
ti k�
25
V,
�� M N
jj
R�
i
�7
-T.
Px
Lm
IM
r1i
L4
1-7
in..
�A
r
Februar 2(
ITEM: 10- 8
- 49
R�
i
�7
-T.
Px
Lm
IM
r1i
L4
1-7
in..
�A
missioners -
Februar 2(
ITEM: 10- 8
- 49
R�
i
�7
-T.
Px
Lm
IM
r1i
L4
(LI, Y+.
cammurtity Mt'etiar n(fi6ga ] R njag "L1est b an Liev-elopm. Inc.
Projeci N rne:_T]w Apan -w % Pa rs QRkE The Rc5mT -at Fortm (9ak-s
f t� y c:: �.
All LFiUC13WEst Church
Board of Commissioners - Februarys . 2020�� ���
ITEM: 10- 8 - 50
q /
el- DO R_I4�
i,P M1 c i -
�'Lf �N T�'.
2—'v}
di L. ""L - I_, .I—
{ L+d 7
r
I I
Nil2i
LF ! C
f.
ILI
r d
t
_
'#
!
7-1-/
r
}
+I'
{
4
J
{
1 &5
�
C
VA lk
L
1
t w°
f t� y c:: �.
All LFiUC13WEst Church
Board of Commissioners - Februarys . 2020�� ���
ITEM: 10- 8 - 50
q /
el- DO R_I4�
A41, R,4,
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 51
Y- W-Ar j �W
CAI i F pyJ�) blk
C-A( ;>r X611
� r ILIL
c pa%:x�
..
RYA
r
.J &4
3
71tytml-t
6�CT-2&
U4-+
ILA
�J" -r,,If - - , r .
o Vv-trh°
I jo 4141i if wir",
St -71
f,
7//4
�•7
lat
tu,�
-� Air
-
f`
Blip- Af- 'r q
io - Lt 3
O
I
t *
.fir( -vn
l 1o,-;4 $
�i Br�f1, m i ioners - February 3, 2020
3o Loa
1 I V ki T ckl Lice vj- p
044,b(cJ1F,.1 $dn-z, Ve.AAa.�
�f Tv M6c�a.AJ WO 9651�C.jAve
- )11 -1112 Ssego 61 @ HOMAAL, c
i c ck
1WL7
R
-MCA Sr
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 53
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request bV Logan Developers Inc
Protect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm /
Name Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address
�t � ,c t 6 3, o ��' ✓.�.t CoTTi�' C� . Co �j
f'Q �� 1 ")
v1
Zi0 N Gc— 70-� -2-37�7
� r
9/0- qjl -)-to
7
NNA 102- s
f c c MW"
G S
It
1
Ar-�"d ZU
W N t bin 866' b' v, rz-j "eC�.. v 401 4q3 -7aa
j 7-W q-1 - 0 O'l 17CJ�IilLCS P a tNl Ol iCelrs 0.® �,
SSI 1 e Dc • XPI 11 7D '3111 0 ci 3 S
-113 W) he w 1
Be 13
90 V
C-rr,4�L, P,1 6jl :bD—
7TJ6 5-4,6
Hampstead Annex Building Auditom Nov h 2", 2019 5:30 P.M
Mard of Commissioners - February 3�Z01
ITEM: 10- 8 - 54
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2
ITEM: 10- 8 - 55
I&A—'
i
""at
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm
Nam
Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number
%0316 c4
1
ID —� Z — 7(4 e)
/ e. ,
Jam, a x
1021 Cr `,& Cn
q 10 (02(0- 15`z�i
le - id-t
7%
', i T Y w wt
" ( �
6S—O P/Sl
7 /0— V
tonal ,
CO 10
-r-
Qa6 �, ► r c
clI s�
e�It- I
(1a
Hampstead Annex uilding Auditorium Noven<��2th, 2019
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 56
Email Address
') - -(OV4
Rk 2
� v
�'u
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm
ame Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address
000) e
�s `e ► t ,o �-�
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven��2`h, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 57
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
Proiect Name: -The Oaks at Mu -rray Farm
Name Propertv Address / Neighborhood Phone Numher Fmnil Atlrlrocc
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven�012`h, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 58
UYlr
;LS I Do, ea/Z7
<< cat-,
74'
q/"p 3 g'
L K I
G�i it es
`J b b 3.rt�,�,
-
SM J
����� elf
D '�
�'1Sr �,�e,5'�v I�Q
4
!
Q MSm �' a� AN tKi AL
/�[�
�� -S
7-Ti
� b
*kU
kz CMG ��
74 - 7lS -g706
✓.. �4r0,,�4
7 sc
l d 3 !9 7 -9197
a itI
.a
1z; 3
�i JOENWi#1,4 P
�Co6.� �I ilOci v�� UG
°JAG - (3
A4sabp(e cool
;cq
2340
tars a a,-7 CL `
ell
n Srce,1
71
-TIA
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium Noven�012`h, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 58
UYlr
;LS I Do, ea/Z7
<< cat-,
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
" erne � 6a ks=at=Mtrrr-aV Fa r -- - --
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium NoveyVWth, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 59
'Y WMEM
��
♦ 1
����
F
AF
• i °.e.
'
MI �/
♦ Ili%
r /f ,�
rim ME =V-J�ffl�ffl-
�1� Fate w-*-
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium NoveyVWth, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February
ITEM: 10- 8 - 59
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc
Dreier^+ Name The Qaks at l)A ay C-,r
ivame Property Address/ Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address
Z o
io�is to g2r
n e- C66S CC' Ck \6, 31 'NRn m --la-D-00T <2yoy
l r 1A
t Gv 3L (fn
Zen `tco - 'T P- 7
4 vv,
kd 4/ v nJf i -t W - 12 v fl cam
I /i me
A
�4O D
l-
-'
c
c r�
r 1c
Z sc 10
1
r
VIA�rice
MS Gel .t f- �J `�
q ►o ` W w" z
n I Aftti oo w.
ate e- KCam[6kec
n Gb 1j 61 1 tr
�- �`( t
PS A- G14
9 3 U'S A,)
p�Ilo-Gt
a 7V- ,V-ic. s-
an,
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12th, 2019 5:30 P.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 60
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc.
Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 61
MMM
/G cyfu
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc.
Nuiect Nante. The Oaks at.Murray Farni
Property. Address Neighbo
X79
Z-1
TT
S,
v 7
I/ CUC)
r-41 Li I L-0 1-j vlj ES
Phone Number
1/7
Email Address %Ole
11
j ? Y-
(fCL r>d)4 5 -2 -30�)W/ j
e
Hampstead Annex Building Audito N aory q 12t', 2019
Y
98aWd of Commissioners - Febru
ITEM: 10- 8 - 62
7:00 P.M
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc.
Pruiect Name. The Oaks at Murrav Fain,
Name l Property Address/ Neighborhood
n l 47 Win e- Ce �Ca✓ � tro 1 v vX CetoKtu -6 t` Vi,,,i-_
Err, cxw 0 6C3' Cv[ c"j 250 UU
Phone Number Email Address
Qf�t 5KU —G3�4�
s e auto �lccr,/Jr
d40
9lozg7 (,3g7
o4,n�bey �l
o Z t7 Cv eI
�aiG�l C
2- 7- f'6S�- ��
1
r�
9. /,o- 9 2. 1 -S-2 Si
U �G t (� C•'t v� irQ¢- r/ �t 6L\
` 7 2-:5 � IzJv 2 Lt 4La— 2 —�
1 e 1`0�, -�]� -► �S VV f�,e ��� _ ��� X31 -S-)
C�
Hampstead Annex Building Auditord of Commissioners - Februaryepp(f0121h1 2019 7:00 P.M
ITEM: 10- 8 - 63
Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc.
Proiect Name. The Oaks at Murray Fa, in
Hampstead Annex Building Auditord of Commissioners - February 3, Z0Y012tn 2019 7:00 P.M
ITEM: 10- 8 - 64
Ila
�G
�J
FAY O�Q�
A
ti
\�P
MFNOR ��
0PNks m
P�Q m
�o
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NORTH
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:
PROPERTY PINS:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING USE:
PROPOSED USE:
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY:
PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY:
PROPOSED UNITS
TOTAL UNIT COUNT:
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
DUPLEXES:
(17) BUILDINGS
APARTMENTS:
(12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
PERIMETER SETBACK:
FRONT SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
SIDE SETBACK:
BUILDING SEPARATION:
SINGLE FAMILY:
SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX:
OTHER DWELLINGS:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT:
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR
BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION
W
MR.
H
X
I Ot
EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE "- --
UPFITTED FOR PROJECT
ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION i -
EXISTING
WATERMAI N
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 65
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000,
R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU /AC (523 UNITS)
7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS)
388 UNITS
66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.)
34 UNITS
288 UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
10'
20'
20'
N/A
45'(3 STORIES)
± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH
POOL AND POOL HOUSE
DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE
TO PRESERVE EXISTING
OAK TREES
GRAVITY
EWER MH
(TYP.)
241nit Apt.
8" GRAVI
SEWER(
SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i
A Unit Apt. dg
Z
4 ow Apt"
alas N
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
24 UNIT APARTMENT
BUILDING, TYP.
(12 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
r-- GATE
a-
M
�
� I
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING
r
PARKING PROVIDED:
55
ADA SPACES:
12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED)
GARAGES:
I
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR
EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF
PARKING REQUIRED:
4 SPACES
w
4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH
APARTMENTS)
ADA SPACES:
1 SPACE
U)
w
tY
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 65
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000,
R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU /AC (523 UNITS)
7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS)
388 UNITS
66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.)
34 UNITS
288 UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
10'
20'
20'
N/A
45'(3 STORIES)
± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH
POOL AND POOL HOUSE
DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE
TO PRESERVE EXISTING
OAK TREES
GRAVITY
EWER MH
(TYP.)
241nit Apt.
8" GRAVI
SEWER(
SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i
A Unit Apt. dg
Z
4 ow Apt"
alas N
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
24 UNIT APARTMENT
BUILDING, TYP.
(12 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
r-- GATE
a-
M
�
528 SPACES
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING
r
PARKING PROVIDED:
55
ADA SPACES:
12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED)
GARAGES:
I
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR
EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF
PARKING REQUIRED:
4 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED:
4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH
APARTMENTS)
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM
UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS.
PARKING REQUIRED:
528 SPACES
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING
12 *44 = 528
PARKING PROVIDED:
539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES)
ADA SPACES:
12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED)
GARAGES:
42 SPACES
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR
EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF
PARKING REQUIRED:
4 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED:
4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH
APARTMENTS)
ADA SPACES:
1 SPACE
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:
REQUIRED PROVIDED
388 UNITS x .03 = 11.64 AC
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.82 AC 5.83 AC
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.82 AC 5.83 AC
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE
SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE.
WETLAND AREA,
TYP.
55t- I I / I I ;-]
�I� L
��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i�
fit
s WIN -' 2
g
■■■■ ■
II
r ■
SETBACK
TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP.
rrl
J�
± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE
WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA
± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE
DUPLEX, TYP.
F GATE � (17 TOTAL
BUILDINGS) r
- - - - I i - --------
-
O O O Q 11 1;
iso
s -ss -ss `
r ` 5
y
0 G
Ole
STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER
± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI
PORTERS NECK ROAD
± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND)
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING:
1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE
ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR
SIREN ACTIVATION.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS
PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES
AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT
- 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.)
W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss
Rq SS RR '
- - - Z
Ell G VITY
WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE
( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T
TYP.
12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6
O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O
45' ROW �-
- - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77
I _I I F--'
- ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 %
-41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��,
I/ � � 36 / ``
I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER
(D I
_ `
43 i' I
T _ � � ± 1.90 AC
__ 1
a7
STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ /
± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I
TIBBY'S DRIVE
PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
ACCESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXISTING
WATERMAIN
0 200 400 600 feet
N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200'
O
U
c�
O
U
O
Q
W
c�
W
W
O
I
V
CrIT1�
nw
F---I
h--I
,W
Z
i
55t- I I / I I ;-]
�I� L
��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i�
fit
s WIN -' 2
g
■■■■ ■
II
r ■
SETBACK
TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP.
rrl
J�
± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE
WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA
± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE
DUPLEX, TYP.
F GATE � (17 TOTAL
BUILDINGS) r
- - - - I i - --------
-
O O O Q 11 1;
iso
s -ss -ss `
r ` 5
y
0 G
Ole
STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER
± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI
PORTERS NECK ROAD
± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND)
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING:
1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE
ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR
SIREN ACTIVATION.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS
PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES
AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT
- 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.)
W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss
Rq SS RR '
- - - Z
Ell G VITY
WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE
( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T
TYP.
12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6
O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O
45' ROW �-
- - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77
I _I I F--'
- ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 %
-41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��,
I/ � � 36 / ``
I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER
(D I
_ `
43 i' I
T _ � � ± 1.90 AC
__ 1
a7
STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ /
± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I
TIBBY'S DRIVE
PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
ACCESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXISTING
WATERMAIN
0 200 400 600 feet
N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200'
O
U
c�
O
U
O
Q
W
c�
W
W
O
I
V
CrIT1�
nw
F---I
h--I
,W
Z
O
U)
w
tY
U�
W
H
Ln
H �
�
N
W�U
o
�h
�
o
� H
LL_
(�
z
O
Lu
O
^ IM
U
wo.
�?
z
c
0
��N
z
3 c I
~a
LU
y 4-4 ^ `�
s
W
r
C\]
biC
�z
A W
W
H
H
�U
C',o
ocz>
N N
Z O 11
O a�
Q
U)
2
z
00 0
O
LL
0
(n J Q
Z
� } z 0
a C, L'
H E0 0
Q
Z
LU
w z
W �0In
O OJ�w
o
> zZY
Q
a �°T
ww�?�0
o o�a 000
SEAL
LP- 1
PEI JOB #:
19305.PE
Adiacent Property Owners - The Oaks at Murrav Farm
STAKS MARIANNA
734 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
734 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
HENSHAW JUSTIN W TONYA A
8409 ROSEMARY LN
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
8409 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
LAMBETH ROBERT L MARY G
709 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
709 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
ROWAN ROBERT
426 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
426 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
COVIL ELLIS M JR ETAL
305 ELK SUMMIT DR
TODD, NC 28684
8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
SANFORD UNIE 0
321 PORTERS NECK RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
321 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
BATTS RICHARD A MELISSA E
8401 ROSEMARY LN
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
8401 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
OLONE DIANNE C
705 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
705 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
TODD JERRY W JR LEANN S
420 TIBBYS DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
420 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
PINSON MICHAEL D SARAH M
430 LADY BUG LN
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
430 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
GREINER FRANCES S
802 PORTERS NECK RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
802 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
HARRISON RUSSELL D SR VERDALE D
208 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
208 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
SPENCER YVONNE D
508 TIBBY'S DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
508 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
FIDLER ANDREW F MARY E
438 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
438 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
WEAVER RONALD D KIMBERLY J
722 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
722 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
BERRY COLLIN M SUSAN V
425 LADY BUG LANE
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
425 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
MROZ GREGORY E RACHEL M
422 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
422 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC
PO BOX 4014
WILMINGTON, NC 28406
8330 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA
PO BOX 12051
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
730 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
PATTERSON RONALD JR JENNIFER
416 TIBBYS DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
416 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
CAUDILL JEREMY RUSSELL JESSICA JO
1218 BOWFIN LN
UNIT 2
CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428
8417 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
GENES JOSHUA K SAMANTHA S
453 LADY BUG LN
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
453 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
LATSTETTER ROBERT ANN
634 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
634 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
CUSHENBERRY JAMES ANGELA JANEY
629 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
629 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
NECHES WILLIAM TRUST
PO BOX 10871
WILMINGTON, NC 28404
421 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
MCMULLAN THERESE M
11047 SCOTTS LANDING RD
LAUREL, MD 20723
514 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
BARNHILL STEVEN AMY
8421 ROSEMARY LN
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
8421 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
THOMAS BRYAN C ETAL
1425 AVENEL DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
609 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
ONATE JAMES F LAUREL H
608 TIBBYS DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
608 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
DOLLAR DUSTY L JILL K
620 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
620 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
FILAK JEFFREY M CHRISTEL P
418 CHABLIS WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
418 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
BLTD PROPERTIES LLC
8405 FREESTONE AVE
HENRICO, VA 23229
817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
KNITTEL PATRICK A BRITTANY E
713 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
713 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
BUCKINGHAM JAMES JR ELIZABETH
612 TIBBYS DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
612 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
NESTER DALLAS G LYNNE W
225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
8410 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
ZIERMANN THOMAS R PATRICIA M
725 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
725 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL
8376 MARKET ST
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
8376 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
HALL STEPHEN C JENNIFER
500 TIBBYS DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
500 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
LEWIS CHARLES W E ELIZABETH
730 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
730 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 66
MARGUCCIO DAVID J WENDY E
606 WINERY WAY
HARTWICK ROBERT W FARANAKA A
618 WINERY WAY
CONKLIN MARCUS R
406 LADY BUG LN
MCKOY HUBERT JEROME ALICE N
520 TIBBYS DR
DEEN MICHELLE
305 PORTERS NECK RD
KITCHEN CHARLES TABITHA A
8402 YEARLING LN
USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W
325 BRETONSHIRE RD
WHALEY FAMILY IRREVOCABLE ASSET PROT
625 WINERY WAY
OPALKA SCOTT COLLEEN
434 CHABLIS WAY
MARTIN DANNY CJR ANGELITA S
705 PORTERS NECK RD
HALAC KENT E ALAI NA J KIM
742 WINERY WAY
JAMES ELSIE C IV AMY W
516 TIBBYS DR
ELKIN TIMMIE L CHERI P
404 TIBBY'S DR
SHAW DANIEL
429 LADY BUG LN
COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL
305 ELK SUMMIT DR
RENYE KEITH E HEATHER L
430 CHABLIS WAY
HARTZELLJOSHUA KIMBERLY JOY
715 PORTERS NECK RD
ROBSON CHELSEA B SIMON D
428 TIBBYS DR
MCDONALD TAMMY Y SEAN V
637 WINERY WAY
EDWARDS MICHAEL DAYMA
512 TIBBYS DR
FONVILLE RICHIE D CATHLEENA L
8418 YEARLING LN
BUNN DEREK W ANGELA
8407 REISLING AVE
HUDSON MICHAEL L DEANNA H
706 WINERY WAY
LLOYD MANUEL W HELENA C
204 CHABLIS WAY
MURRAY ROBERT C III ULRIKE H
8313 SHIRAZ WAY
BASS JOEL PERCY II SANDRA C
511 TIBBYS DR
CARTER DIANE H
313 PORTERS NECK RD
LIOTTA RAY ETAL
729 WINERY WAY
POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC
JOHNSON KYLE C AMANDA T
8403 REISLING AVE
MORGAN KENNETH TERESA
507 TIBBYS DR
HOSS GREGG E HEIDI HANH THI
608 CHABLIS WAY
PORTER ALTON G JOAN A
719 PORTERS NECK RD
CAVAN JOHN JOANNE W
721 WINERY WAY
KUPERUS RYAN KELLI 0
426 LADY BUG LN
REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA I
REEVES CHAD E PATRICIA C
401 LADY BUG LN
SNEEDEN DAVID G ETAL
1840 LIVE OAK PKWY 5
ALTMAN SAMUEL R
801 PORTERS NECK RD
SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL
8376 MARKET ST
GATES ANDREW P STACEY N
8501 BISON CT
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
TODD, NC 28684
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 67
606 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
618 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
406 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
520 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
305 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8402 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
8412 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
625 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
434 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
705 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
742 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
516 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
404 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
429 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
430 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
715 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
428 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
637 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
512 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
8418 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
8407 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON
706 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
204 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
8313 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON
511 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
313 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
729 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
8342 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
8403 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON
507 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
608 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
719 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
721 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
426 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
417 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
401 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
207 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
805 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8380 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
8501 BISON CT WILMINGTON
RICKS BARBARA MELVIN
615 TIBBYS DR
MARLOWE RONALD C
701 PORTERS NECK RD
ROSSI RICHARD A ANDREA E
8406 YEARLING LN
REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA
3301 BENSON DR
COTHREN FAMILY TRUST
301 PORTERS NECK RD
DALLOS RANDALL P KRISTIN M
8425 ROSEMARY LN
COTHREN FAMILY TRUST
301 PORTERS NECK RD
GUO LIANHONG L QINGNAN YAO
436 CLOVERDALE DR
BASTIAN JARVIS R CATHERINE A
518 CHABLIS WAY
TURNER CHRISTOPHER W JEANNE H
515 TIBBYS DR
MICHAELSON MARTIN J ANN
MCCARTHY JONATHAN ERIN
738 WINERY WAY
KARAM BERNARD J EILEEN M
710 WINERY WAY
NUNALEE WALTER H II ALLYN S
604 TIBBYS DR
SMITH CRAIG ANDREA
8413 ROSEMARY LN
OGDEN VOL FIRE DEPT INC ETAL
7375 MARKET ST
SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL
8376 MARKET ST
FORCINITO DAVID DANA
523 TIBBYS DR
NICHOLSON MATTHEW S
410 LADY BUG LN
DAVIDSON BRIAN CATHERINE S
8402 REISLING AVE
READY CHRISTINE ETAL
2020 SCRIMSHAW PL
HENDERSON JOHN A LAUREN
216 CHABLIS WAY
KRISTY JACOB
414 LADY BUG LN
MURRAY BEN G HEIRS
9225 PINEY WOODS RD
WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER L MELISSA D
710 CHABLIS WAY
WHITE MAJOR LEE IV
605 TIBBYS DR
LEA ROBERT GLENN ETAL
519 MARKET ST
COSTELLO RONALD J NORA A
604 CHABLIS WAY
HIGH NICKOLAUS M KRISTY M
718 WINERY WAY
BOWDITCH BRENT G SARA N
633 WINERY WAY
MANCHESTER AARON D AMANDA P
304 CHABLIS WAY
MADEJ MICHAEL SR DYLAH S
417 PORTERS NECK RD
THOMAS TAD L REBECCA J
501 TIBBYS DR
HERRING HERMON GREGORY
412 TIBBYS DR
GREEN JAMES A JR VIVIAN T
BONEAU ROBERT W LAURA K
8410 YEARLING LN
DOWD GREGORY P JR KARYL R
613 TIBBYS DR
BRIGGS PAUL PATRICIA
702 CHABLIS WAY
JOSE KRISTOPHER M KRISTIN A
300 CHABLIS WAY
SHAFFIN PROPERTIES LLC
1515 CHESTNUT ST
MORGAN DAVID P MICHELLE S
630 WINERY WAY
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
SUITE 535 RALEIGH, NC 27619
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WEXFORD, PA 15090
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 11171 WILMINGTON, NC 28404
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILLARD, NC 28478
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 11157 WILMINGTON, NC 28404
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 68
615 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
701 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8406 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
301 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8425 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
221 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
602 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
518 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
515 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
746 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
738 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
710 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
604 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
8413 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
8310 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON
8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
523 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
410 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8402 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON
102 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON
216 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
414 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
710 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
605 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
8320 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
604 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
718 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
633 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
304 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
417 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
501 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
412 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
97 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON
8410 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
613 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
702 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
300 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
630 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
ALTMAN SAMUEL R
801 PORTERS NECK RD
MURRAY ROBERT C JR EMMA Y TR
8370 MARKET ST
COBLE RAY MARION KWANG HYONG
522 CHABLIS WAY
ONUFROCK KENNETH MARIA
418 LADY BUG LN
EUBANKS JAMES R JOAN C
718 CHABLIS WAY
FIELDS HARRY M LEEANNE P
437 LADY BUG LN
LONG ROBERT DEVITT
217 PORTERS NECK RD
LEA R GLENN ETAL
THOMAS RONALD D TRACY J
510 CHABLIS WAY
JAGUTIS JARED BRONWYN
702 WINERY WAY
VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC
STANFIELD JEFFREY L KATHRYN C
714 WINERY WAY
VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC
3301 BENSON DR
LOEHR GREGORY B AMANDA E
442 CHABLIS WAY
ALTMAN SAMUEL R
801 PORTERS NECK RD
TERRY ADRIENNE R
701 WINERY WAY
BECKWITH RAYMOND J LAUREN
454 LADY BUG LN
USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W
325 BRETONSHIRE RD
EDWARDS RICKY N KAREN
8406 MARKET ST
KLINE SCOTT A AMY C
638 WINERY WAY
LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P
8356 MARKET ST
GIRARD DENNIS J
424 TIBBYS DR
BALDINELL RICHARD JESSICA A
8405 ROSEMARY LN
CONNER TRACIE LANCE
610 WINERY WAY
DEGROOT RACHEL LYNN
SANCHEZ CADE A ALEXA N
414 CHABLIS WAY
MIKLOUCICH FRANCIS J JR LINDSAY
412 CHABLIS WAY
WOODS BERNICE ROGER
299 HOLDER RD
NAGLE CHRISTOPHER M ANGELA PAIGE COI
645 WINERY WAY
NGUYEN HAI D LOAN P
446 LADY BUG LN
CIVELLI RICHARD V JENNIFER L
8414 YEARLING LN
CROOM CHRISTOPHER B AMY L
726 CHABLIS WAY
BOYELL JOSEPH J KATHLEEN A SMYTHE
308 CHABLIS WAY
HUFHAM FORREST MELISSA
8429 ROSEMARY LN
OLSON PETER RICHARD
601 TIBBYS DR
COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL
305 ELK SUMMIT DR
GOSLINE DENNIS YVETTE M
8674 GRAYSON PARK DR
LEEDS JONATHAN P JENNIFER E H
504 TIBBYS DR
LONG JACOB R BRITTANY
402 LADY BUG LN
BAUCOM KEVIN E DEBRA P
641 WINERY WAY
REAL SOUND VENTURES LLC
2317 LYNNWOOD DR
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
RALEIGH, NC 27609
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
PO BOX 7 NANUET, NY 10954
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
BALTIMORE, OH 43105
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
TODD, NC 28684
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 69
801 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8390 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
522 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
418 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
718 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
437 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
203 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
510 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
702 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
642 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
714 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
614 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
442 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
725 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
701 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
454 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8414 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
8406 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
638 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
8356 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
424 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
8405 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
610 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
408 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
414 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
412 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
524 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
645 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
446 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8414 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON
726 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
308 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
8429 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
601 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
213 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
504 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
402 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
641 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
713 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
POORE LEE L
212 CHABLIS WAY
MUIR GARY S AMIEE L
422 LADY BUG LN
HIATT ROBERT C ETAL
8417 ROSEMARY LN
WASSERBERG MARTIN J ETHEL D
8406 REISLING AVE
DE LA ROSA DAVID YACKELINE M
433 LADY BUG LN
WOOD WILLIAM MARY
734 CHABLIS WAY
FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST
421 TIBBYS DR
LETTS PAUL TRACY B
317 PORTERS NECK RD
MANN JASON D ERIN E
809 PORTERS NECK RD
DEMARCO TERESA M RANDY
722 WINERY WAY
CARR DANIEL C SHENAN J
1461 FINAL LANDING LN
FICKEN ROLF H LORI A
622 WINERY WAY
GATWOOD ELDEN JOHN
519 TIBBYS DR
GREEN CHRISTABELL
101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD
HESSENIUS JAY S BRANDI
706 CHABLIS WAY
MAKO KOURTNEY C
733 WINERY WAY
WARREN JOHN D
501 PORTERS NECK RD
JONES APRIL B
405 LADY BUG LN
NESTER DALLAS LYNNE W
225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR
TYLER STEPHEN A DOROTHY J
804 PORTERS NECK RD
FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST
421 TIBBYS DR
BISSELINK FRANK HBM JEAN M
8433 ROSEMARY LN
CHAMP MCD -DAVIS FOUNDATION
PO BOX 1268
HOLT REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES INC
PO BOX 53157
MARLING JAMES B ETAL
721 PORTERS NECK RD
LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P
8350 MARKET ST
WHELDON CHARLES R
717 PORTERS NECK RD
COLENDA BENJAMIN E HEATHER A
813 PORTERS NECK RD
BLACHER RYAN D JESSICA C
626 WINERY WAY
POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC
PO BOX 4014
ZHAO YAN CHONG HUA LIN
408 CHABLIS WAY
MILLIKEN GAIL GEORGE W
4473 AMELIA CT
BOUGHTON RICHARD RJR JENNIFER
616 CHABLIS WAY
POPE JERRY W
400 TIBBYS DR
DEXTER STACY P PATRICIA L
508 SHUNEY ST
SANTANIELLO AMATO ELAINE M
409 LADY BUG LN
BLTD PROPERTIES LLC
8405 FREESTONE AVE
SORENSEN SHAUN
17 SLOOP ST
AEIN MARGARET
717 WINERY WAY
CRUMRINE KEVIN T CHRISTINA B
621 WINERY WAY
ADAMS ANDREW D JODI N
714 CHABLIS WAY
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 70
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28402
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28406
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28405
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
HENRICO, VA 23229
SWANSBORO, NC 28584
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
212 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
422 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8417 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
8406 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON
433 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
734 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
421 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
317 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
809 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
722 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
726 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
622 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
519 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON
706 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
733 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
501 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
405 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
8408 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
804 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8362 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
8433 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON
1011 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8312 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
721 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
8350 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
717 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
813 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
626 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
8318 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
408 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
617 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
616 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
400 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON
401 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
409 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON
817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
309 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON
717 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
621 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON
714 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
HOLLIMAN GREGORY C REGINA T 738 CHABLIS WAY
WAGNER TRACY L 220 CHABLIS WAY
MESSINEO MICHAEL CINDEE 612 CHABLIS WAY
MITCHELL WADE S TRUST NUMBER TWO 2616 HIBERNIA ST
PERDUE MICHAEL W KAYOKO M 8410 REISLING AVE
RAYMER MELISSA E
312 CHABLIS WAY
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 8 - 71
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
DALLAS, TX 75204
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
738 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
220 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
612 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
600TIBBYSDR WILMINGTON
8410 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON
312 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON
PARAMOUNTE
E N G I N E E F? I N G, I N C.
The Oaks at Murray Farm
Stormwater Supplemental Information
As part of the Oaks at Murry Farm project, and any other project in the county, the applicant
understands the sensitivity and importance in both controlling the stormwater runoff from our
site and maintaining the existing drainage patterns from our adjacent properties. To that end,
we have performed the necessary on the ground surveying, investigation, soil testing, wetland
delineation and meeting with landowners that live in this area to determine the most
advantageous design to meet the points stated above. The applicant by its own accord is
placing a condition on the site of controlling the runoff from the 10 inch — 24 -hour storm
(which is the 100 yr storm as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design
Manual), which is significantly greater than the County required 8.05 inch — 24 -hour storm
(which is the 25 -yr event as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design
Manual). In addition, the current drainage ditch (creek) that flows through this property will
not be filled in or cut off any existing drainage. The creek will only be piped minimally for
the road crossing required for the site.
The stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds in the middle of
the site and an infiltration basin on the eastern property line near Shiraz Way. The infiltration
basin was chosen in that location based on the soils test performed by a registered soil
scientist, his test yielded an infiltration rate that measured over 20 inches/hr which deems it a
perfect site for infiltration (preliminary calculations have been run utilizing a 10 in/hr
infiltration rate to remain conservative). As part of this infiltration device, strict specifications
will be provided during the construction phase to maintain the natural soil parameters, ie, to
not disturb the baseline soils which can cause such devices to not function in the manner
intended. An operations and maintenance agreement will also be required to ensure continual
maintenance after construction. The applicant in other developments has built such devices
and has the experience and construction expertise to have such facilities function as intended.
During downstream outfall analysis, it was determined that there are some existing residential
properties that have low elevations on their property without a true outfall. With this in mind
the preliminary site plan has been adjusted to account for the stormwater management
discharging to the three well defined outfall ditches (the two ditches through the middle of the
property and the roadside swale along Porters Neck Rd). The existing runoff from the
proposed development property to these low areas will effectively be reduced as the built -
upon area from the development will be collected and conveyed to the stormwater control
measures where it will be treated and over detained to meet the aforementioned requirements.
For the downstream outfalls, the design team will analyze and coordinate
information/findings with New Hanover County Engineering during the permitting process.
However, with placing the 100 yr storm condition on the site, the downstream features will
not be affected adversely by the construction of this site.
1 2 2 C 1 N E M A D R I V E W I L M I N G T ❑ N, N C 2 S 4 ❑ 3
P H ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 9 - 1
�G
�J
J �
FINy O P
A
Pti
MFN�FN 5
oRitrF yq <<
sNOP�S O
p,FzO��JE �m
�o
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NORTH
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:
PROPERTY PINS:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING USE:
PROPOSED USE:
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY:
PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY:
PROPOSED UNITS
TOTAL UNIT COUNT:
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
DUPLEXES:
(17) BUILDINGS
APARTMENTS:
(12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
PERIMETER SETBACK:
FRONT SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
SIDE SETBACK:
BUILDING SEPARATION:
SINGLE FAMILY:
SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX:
OTHER DWELLINGS:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT:
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR
BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION
�I
W
X �w
I
X
O I� IE
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE
UPFITTED FOR PROJECT
ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION
EXISTING
WATERMAI N
I"
111
W
oners -
ITEM: 10- 9 - 2
"441 ' w�
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000,
R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW - DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU /AC (523 UNITS)
7.33 DU /AC (388 UNITS)
384 UNITS
62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.)
34 UNITS
288 UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
10'
20'
20'
N/A
45' (3 STORIES)
DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE
TO PRESERVE EXISTING
LARGE TREES
± 1.08 ACTIVE OPEN
SPACE WITH POOL
AND POOL HOUSE
8" GRAVITY
SEWER (TYP )
W
�O
�J
■J
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
Existing Ditch to
Be Cleaned &
Stabilized; to
Remain Unpiped
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM
UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS.
PARKING REQUIRED: 528 SPACES
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 12 *44 = 528
PARKING PROVIDED: 539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES)
ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED)
GARAGES: 42 SPACES
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR
EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF
PARKING REQURED: 4 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH
APARTMENTS)
ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE
DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:
REQUIRED PROVIDED
384 UNITS x.03 = 11.52 AC
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN.
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN.
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE
SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE.
24 UNIT APARTM T GRAVITY SEWER MH -
BUILDING, TYP. (TYP.)
(12 TOTAL BUILDIN S)
GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA,
NOTES THIS TYP.
SHEET
Proposed Existing
Culvert Pond with
Outfall into
Stream
± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN S ACE WITH POSSIBLE
WALKING TRAIL /OPEN P Y AREA
± 0.93 AC ACTIVE PEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PA
GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP.
NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.)
SHEET
ea9
kb %bFhl�kbldd z: - ed9 STORMWATER
I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3
- ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC
24'Unit APt. BTtlg
I . L
24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH
20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK
7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP.
(7 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
Stormwater
Pond
Outfalls to
i i i i i i i i Ditch
z
3
MR
b rd
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING-
1 . ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE
ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR
SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES-
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS
PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES
AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY;
RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS
NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED
20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT
65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.)
I
W W Q W
- _ Z _ FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss •
8" W ERM N (TYP) G VITY FIRE
SEW MH -A
(TYP.) I I HYD NT
- W I (TYP.)
O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A 11 1 16 1 1 1 0 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I.
\ 12 ,
--
- -- - 45' ROW
O O ���- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ \ /� T
j� 16 17 1 35 �`♦ O �� O �i I �_����r_�__�}- __T__�- I�
-- - - - - -- - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I
_ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��n 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; 0:1 I
I �`�� ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 ' 28 `\ 33 ` , /�, 56 \ \` 51 \, 1 _L_.�----- 1-- L- - -� - -� I
3s / O ' zs i 3o i 31 i 32 \ \O �� STORMWATER I
3s • > 4s INFILTRATION BASIN
O �s - -- r- - - - -- ±1.90 AC I
BUFFER/OPEN l ao' - -- / _ - \
Ia1 I
RMWATER I I SPACE 0 js! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47
1.29 AC I I 1 Q , as , as , O \
.: i, -� -
- - - - - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/
-_�-
- - VEGETATIV UFFER
Stormwater
Pond
Outfalls to
Ditch
nn PORTERS NECK ROAD
± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD
± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND)
TIBBY'S DRIVE
PROPOSED 20'
ACCESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT
_z 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
\
\
\
\
/
Existing Ditch
Soils Tested in
Infiltration Basin
proved
Infiltration Rate
is Very High;
Infiltration Rate
20" / Hr.
f--� -I
CJ�
Existing Swale As
Outfall for
Infiltration Basin U
0
w
Culvert Takes Water Q
W
from Swale to Adjacent
Ditch
W
W
t�
O
I
V J
nW
i�
W
Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit
0 200 400 600 feet
N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200'
a
z
I
O
Z
ea9
kb %bFhl�kbldd z: - ed9 STORMWATER
I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3
- ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC
24'Unit APt. BTtlg
I . L
24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH
20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK
7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP.
(7 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
Stormwater
Pond
Outfalls to
i i i i i i i i Ditch
z
3
MR
b rd
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING-
1 . ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE
ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR
SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES-
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS
PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES
AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY;
RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS
NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED
20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT
65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.)
I
W W Q W
- _ Z _ FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss •
8" W ERM N (TYP) G VITY FIRE
SEW MH -A
(TYP.) I I HYD NT
- W I (TYP.)
O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A 11 1 16 1 1 1 0 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I.
\ 12 ,
--
- -- - 45' ROW
O O ���- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ \ /� T
j� 16 17 1 35 �`♦ O �� O �i I �_����r_�__�}- __T__�- I�
-- - - - - -- - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I
_ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��n 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; 0:1 I
I �`�� ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 ' 28 `\ 33 ` , /�, 56 \ \` 51 \, 1 _L_.�----- 1-- L- - -� - -� I
3s / O ' zs i 3o i 31 i 32 \ \O �� STORMWATER I
3s • > 4s INFILTRATION BASIN
O �s - -- r- - - - -- ±1.90 AC I
BUFFER/OPEN l ao' - -- / _ - \
Ia1 I
RMWATER I I SPACE 0 js! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47
1.29 AC I I 1 Q , as , as , O \
.: i, -� -
- - - - - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/
-_�-
- - VEGETATIV UFFER
Stormwater
Pond
Outfalls to
Ditch
nn PORTERS NECK ROAD
± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD
± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND)
TIBBY'S DRIVE
PROPOSED 20'
ACCESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT
_z 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
\
\
\
\
/
Existing Ditch
Soils Tested in
Infiltration Basin
proved
Infiltration Rate
is Very High;
Infiltration Rate
20" / Hr.
f--� -I
CJ�
Existing Swale As
Outfall for
Infiltration Basin U
0
w
Culvert Takes Water Q
W
from Swale to Adjacent
Ditch
W
W
t�
O
I
V J
nW
i�
W
Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit
0 200 400 600 feet
N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200'
a
z
O
Z
I—
W
N
z
O
U
W
W
d
O
F-
Z
W
W
O
U
W
>
w
of
U�
W
�T1
OWN
�U
W
z
H 0
O
r�
O
z
Z
OoWZ
�_4 v
J
WU
z
_
ow
0o
�
N
0�
OC
IU
00
a�
W
O
Z
U
t7
W
W
H
~
0
�o
o�
N N
Z all
O o7
Q
U
00 Z
ry
O
O
a¢
Z
Z
U �� (D°
w F- zLLjO
W p �
Z
> o
> Z W
O U J J W
Z
d ()dli�
>Z
W J�> U
0 OWOOU
SEAL
LP- 1
PEI JOB #:
19305.PE
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 10 - 1
�G
,�G
�J
,�o
J �
e�RNFyroJgr ����5
FwY OAP
o�
A
MFi y�FR 5
OP`�S O
�a
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE �\
NORTH
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:
PROPERTY PINS:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING USE:
PROPOSED USE:
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY:
PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY:
PROPOSED UNITS
TOTAL UNIT COUNT:
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
DUPLEXES:
(17) BUILDINGS
APARTMENTS:
(12) BUILDINGS
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
PERIMETER SETBACK:
FRONT SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
SIDE SETBACK:
BUILDING SEPARATION:
SINGLE FAMILY:
SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX:
OTHER DWELLINGS:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE:
MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT:
± 2.12 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH OTHER AMENITIES
POSSIBLE INCLUDING: COURTYARD, CLUBHOUSE &
POOL, DOG PARK, AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES
PRESERVE EXISTING LARGE TREES,
INTEGRATE IN OPEN SPACE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR
BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION
7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP.
(7 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
POSSIBLE LEASING OFFICE/
CLUBHOUSE AMENITIES
EXISTING TREE, TYP.
EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE
UPFITTED FOR PROJECT
ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION
EXISTING
WATERMAIN
3 STORY, 12 UNIT
APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP.
(1 TOTAL BUILDING)
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 11 - 1
►W
x r�
H�
X
gfil
w -
x
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000,
R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU /AC (523 UNITS)
5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS)
300 UNITS
62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP.
34 UNITS
204 UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
10'
20'
20'
N/A
45' (3 STORIES)
"00000 SEEMMEN F
I In �=__
Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l.
tl_v-qvv
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM
UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS.
PARKING REQUIRED:
378 SPACES
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING
4 *44 = 176
30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING
Apt Bldq.
j
16 Unit
'
389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES)
cam}
314
ADA SPACES:
16 Unit APt. B tlq.
GARAGES:
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000,
R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000,
R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001,
R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU /AC (523 UNITS)
5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS)
300 UNITS
62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP.
34 UNITS
204 UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
10'
20'
20'
N/A
45' (3 STORIES)
"00000 SEEMMEN F
I In �=__
Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l.
tl_v-qvv
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM
UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS.
PARKING REQUIRED:
378 SPACES
44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING
4 *44 = 176
30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING
6 *30 = 180
22 SPACES PER 12 UNIT BUILDING
1 *22 = 22
PARKING PROVIDED:
389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES)
SURFACE SPACES:
314
ADA SPACES:
12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED)
GARAGES:
63 SPACES
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR
EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF
PARKING REQURED:
4 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED:
8 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH
w
APARTMENTS)
ADA SPACES:
1 SPACE
DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:
REQUIRED PROVIDED
300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED)
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN.
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN.
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE
SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE.
8" GRAVITY
SEWER (TYP.)
- 2 STORY, 16 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP
(6 TOTAL BUILDINGS)
± 0.31 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE
GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA,
NOTES THIS TYP.
SHEET
a
W
Apt.
o"T
16 nit Apt. B dg.
m0 m
1nd
�ss ��$ -uG -SS- _w _w
24 Unit APt ZA Jc`PP�_
e ag
-- 4 nit Bdg ed9 ST
.I-t} za una Apt. s ae.
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING:
1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE
ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR
SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS
PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES
AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER
± 1.88 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDING WETLANDS) WITH 8" WATERMAIN (TYP.)
POTENTIAL AMENITIES TO INCLUDE: TRAIL, OPEN PLAY AREA,
DOG PARK, CLUBHOUSE & POOL GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY;
± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS
NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED
GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP.
NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.) 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE- FAMILY LOT FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) F_
65'x 120', TYP.
as
I;q _SS w w w -- Z w WINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss vy
7 --
r� W
I -1 1
SEW VIMH
- -- - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -, - - -- - - -- - - I
O O O O O O O O ° 25 22 21 I 20 I 19 11lY ' 18 1 17 I 16 I 15 / 14 / `\ 12 ` 11 I 10 I O 1 O I O 1 0 1 0 1 O I O I c): 0 I.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I / 1 1
m 7 I g I 5 1 4 1 3 1 P
- s W _�5 _� 5 _ _Ss_ 5 _ _ = 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ 5s__ ss_ S 5 ,.� ° ° ,
ss \� s� ssssss 45' ROW -sss5 ss�
N
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/
° - - - - - - - 7 ' 3s CENTRAL GREEN a4 ��''� °� 0: 0:
.I g 2�J 36 �` S �, +0.65 AC `` ' ° ` 52 ; 53 i 54 i 55 i 56 i 57 i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i 6z I
a7 A �; \ 27 �T '��' `` 33 �� �% 51 I I EXISTING
55555 I I ,( / \ j \ I `
38 / �R /rL 28 / z9 I ao I a1 I 32 , s0 % \� STORMWATER I WATERMAIN
0 I I I l ; `•_ / ° ° ° as / INFILTRATION BASIN I I
% 0 PT I I V � �` �I ------ - - - - -- -1.90 AC I I
VEGETATED /_
ORMWATER \ STORMWATER I I I BUFFER/ j 41 /�yT T 1 ` 47
± 1.20 AC ± 1.29 AC I •�� / 42 I 43 I a4 1 15 1 O
OPEN SPACE \�� / I I I ` as
_ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ` / L20' RIMETER SETBACK/ \
` - -- L - , - -�
- - - - - - - - - - - -� - - � - - - VEG ATIVE Bl)FFER �
SEE INSET FOR
GATED ACCESS
OPTION
TIBBY'S DRIVE
mow: wZI
3 STORY, 24 UNIT
APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP.
(4 TOTAL BUILDING)
24' SETBACK FOR BUILDINGS
GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGHT
20' PERIMTER BUILDING SETBACK
-M PORTERS NECK ROAD
VEGETATED BUFFER
BEHIND DUPLEXES
GRAVITY SEWER MH
(TYP.)
PROPOSED 20' ACCESS
& UTILITY EASEMENT
11x111/"•111 AM ! ATr XAnT1 I C IM Kl
OR
)ENTS
\
± 5.89 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE
TURNAROUND LANE FOR
DRIVERS WITHOUT ACCESS RFID
\
\
\
\
\
/ \ I 0 200 400 600 feet
GATED ACCESS OPTION
PER PLANNING BOARD CONDITION Lv
NOT TO SCALE N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200'
O
U
f�l
O
U
O
Q
W
W
,W
F-�-1
O
I
r�
V J
nW
F-'-i
I--I
W
rn
W
rn
(O
o
N
In
z
w
O
U
�D
z
H
z
g
U)
Z
O
c�
Z
~
o0
~
z
O
w
J
a
Z
O
v
_
z
~
°
Q
o
m
z
0
z
U
O
z
a
a_
0
U_
W
�
a
a
Z
O
°w
�Q
z
°w
w
W
>
W
w
x
N
w w
cc
M
x
U'.1
H
W
oc
N
�U
W
w
ll�
O
O��h
W H
z_
z
O
w
O
v
J
U
WO
m0 w
z
�
0
N
z
o�
1
W
p
a�
U U
w
z
N s-1 o
1� 4-1� U
0�
A W
O
W
�
O
xW0
00
N p
N N
Z N I
O
Q
U
~
~ » z
>_
00
O
LL
>_
as 0
Z
-
U D <��
�a�°
W azww
LLJ
Z
w o
w
Z y
O U J J W
Z W Z J
(Z 0dLLLL]
>Z>
Q W J -> U
f- Q w Q W
DU)DDU
SEAL
LP-1
PEI JOB #:
19305.PE
1
Gc�IMUN6'j�'
Prepared by:
PARAMOUNTE
F N G F N E E R I N G. I N G.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
(910) 791 -6707 (0) (910) 791 -6760 (F)
NC License #: C -2846
DATE: 22 January 2020
SCALE: 1 " = 1 00' At 24" x 54"
NORTH
t3U 4 L. l
. —1 tee)
`f�UNf�
[ � �' f � ] i [ � I � I � ►� � I � l
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 11 - 2
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:
PROPERTY PINS:
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING USE:
PROPOSED USE:
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:
RMF- LALLOWABLE DENSITY:
PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY:
PROPOSED UNITS
TOTAL UNIT COUNT:
SINGLE FAMILY LOTS:
DUPLEXES:
(17) BUILDINGS
APARTMENTS:
(4) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS
(6) 16 -UNIT BUILDINGS
(1) 12 -UNIT BUILDING
± 52.39 ACRES
R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 -008 -000,
R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900 -004- 009 -000,
R03700- 001- 007 -000, R03700- 001 -006 -000,
R02900- 004 -010 -000, R02900- 004 -010 -001,
R03700- 001- 003 -000, R03700- 001 -002 -000
R -15, R20
RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY)
SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT
SINGLE- FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI- FAMILY
COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
10 DU/AC (523 UNITS)
5.73 DU/AC (300 UNITS)
300 UNITS
62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP.
34 UNITS
204 UNITS
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
PERIMETER SETBACK:
FRONT SETBACK:
REAR SETBACK:
SIDE SETBACK:
BUILDING SEPARATION:
SINGLE FAMILY
20'
20'
15'
5' INTERIOR
10' SIDE STREET
MULTI - FAMILY
20'
35'
25'
20' INTERIOR
30' SIDE STREET
SINGLE FAMILY: 10'
SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: 20'
OTHER DWELLINGS: 20'
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: NIA
MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: 45'(3 STORIES)
APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BED-
ROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS.
PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES
44 SPACES 124 -UNIT BUILDING = 176
30 SPACES/ 16 -UNIT BUILDING = 180
22 SPACES f 12 -UNIT BUILDING= 22
PARKING PROVIDED: 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADAAND
GARAGE SPACES)
ADASPACES: 12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED)
GARAGES: 63 SPACES
111�DMNcUN rTy 5r_1A�✓e \\n_T�r DoT 1�M l f'�f s
TD f : 'f` ,1 L., Dr-,et� r-, , Y Arz_e- .
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH
ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE.
AMENITY CLUBHOUSE: +1- 1100 SF
PARKING REQURED: 11 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED: 11 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA
SPACES; PKG SHARED WI APARTMENTS)
ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE
DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:
REQUIRED PROVIDED
300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 9.00AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED)
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN
ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN
COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT
OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PAS-
SIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE.
Conceptual Site Plan
A—% Ii/9A , iw tIT_— er�
-��rs rive
6
The Oaks at Murray Farm
Porters Neck, North Carolina
SITE DATA (CONT'D)
SITE LIGHTING:
1. ALL STREETAND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNEDAND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY.
2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED
AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER.
3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD.
GATE NOTES:
1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN
ACTIVATION OR OTHERAPPROVED METHOD.
SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES:
1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.
2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PRO
VIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHATARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE.
3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER
LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE.
4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA.
5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK"
AREAAS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH
AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018.
SfN�L.� f;P-AMfL_y Lz7nn,,
Dr -tMUN fj-y
OPPOSITION
MATERIALS
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 12 - 1
%f TM
W.
Inv Z
Z; �_ik
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020-
ITEM: 10-13- 1
7�-
NEW HANOVER
Co UNTY
_
N'S
u.
PROJECT LOCATION
i R
,'E F
PC•BDDS
PC -BDUS
1. AERIALS FROM NEW HANOVER COIIN7 . MOB
W E
S
LEGEND
- PAGES CREEK WATERSHED
SAVPLE LOCATIONS �Eeel
1 inch equals 5, DOD
T
Receiving Waters Pages Creek
SA/HQW(High Quality Waters /recreational uses)
Listed on EPA 303(d) list
Impaired from high levels of bacteria pathogen
Enterococci = Bacteria Pathogens
Prohibited shellfish harvesting area
Red - Closed
Pink -Cond Closed
Blue -Cond Open
B and of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
** SA HQW designation from NC DWR Website, 303�d) list from �1�l��ye�ksit�, shellfish info from NC DMF.
Benefits in controlling or limiting impervious
surfaces (Low density development)
• Protection of wetlands and aquatic ecosystems
• Improved water quality of receiving waterebodies
• Conservation of water resources
• Protection of public health
• Flood control
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 3
Potential Env. Results of Increased Density
• Increased impervious surface results in increased run off carrying
pollutants
• Increased run off carries more polluntants down gradient
• Increased density will result in more wet retention ponds thereby
increasing discharge of pollutants down stream. Wet detention ponds
ineffective for hydrocarbon (oil, gas, tire wear), fertilizer (nitrogen
phosphorous), fecal coliform (bacteria pathogens)
• Increased density will drive additional wetland impacts over lower
density (wetlands are natural filters present on this tract). A lower
density project can avoid on -site wetland impacts.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 4
Environmental Summary
• Despite water quality permitting since the early 70s within this drainage
area, the resultant effect is poor water quality within Pages Creek
• By allowing higher than currently zoned density the approving body is
further risking Pages Creek water quality
• Citizens of New Hanover seek out natural resources most notably water
based recreation and by changing zoning to allow for more density the
approving body places those very resources in greater jeopardy
• There are no guarantees low density will not have an affect to receiving
waters but logic tells you by increasing density you unnecessarily risk the
very natural resources that has attracted many to this region
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 5
Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection
Details I Basemap
About Content Legend
Contents
0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection -
2014 -2018
I
Topographic
Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri
Report Abuse . Contact Us
iota [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519
Mod
Share Print I Measure Find address or place
fdtal Crash Category
40 to 49
Total Crashes
47.00
Fatal_A_Injury Crashes
0.00
B_C_Injury Crashes
13.00
PDO Crashes
34.00
County
NEW HANOVER
Route A
US 17 Aid
Route B
SR 1351
LRS Route
20,0d
/00.
�a
`38
LRS Milepost
e
Comments �,Ziocatiold tted on map
Location Error
NO ERAW >r
0 0 100ft d,
Fls New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, US
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 6
Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection
Details I Basemap
About Content Legend
Contents
0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection -
2014 -2018
I
Topographic
Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri
Report Abuse . Contact Us
iolta [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519
fdtal Crash Category
50 and above
Total Crashes
104.00
Fatal_A_Injury Crashes 1.00
B_C_Injury Crashes
17.00
PDO Crashes
86.00
County
NEW HANOVER
Route A
US 17
Route B
SR 1402
LRS Route
20,000,017,100.00
LRS Milepost
14.43
Mod
Share Print I Measure Find address or place
Comments Location mileposted - ] op'e plotted on map
Location Error NO ERROR
0 -----y0 1S
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 7
A
C —
'iL.
New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USA
Traffic Calming Assessment
Vineyard Plantation
New Hanover County, NC
Fina�
October 2019
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 8
Traffic Calming Assessment
Vineyard Plantation
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared For:
Premier Management Company
P.O. Box 12051
Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 443 -4847
Prepared By:
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
272 N. Front Street, Suite 410
Wilmington, NC 28401
(910) 399 -5699
Project Manager: Zachary Bugg, PhD, PE
Project Principal: Chris Tiesler, PE
Project No. 22762
October 2019
``1111111rrr/®s
H CAR
OF'ESS /p' <�2��
SE
i 45 AL
i .9 'tiGl NEE • ' ('j
•��° cygRY.H. 'a�G �`
////1111110%\\
Ucf 31 Zb O
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 9
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
October 2019
Executive Summary
1
Findings........................................................................................................................................................ ............................... 1
Recommendations....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 2
Introduction............................................................................................................. ............................... 5
ProjectDescription ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5
ScopeOf The Report ..................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5
Data Collection and Summary ................................................................................. ..............................9
Description of Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................ .............................11
Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement ..................................... .............................17
References............................................................................................................... .............................19
Board of Commissioners .7 February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10 -'Y3 - 10 Kittelson &Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Data Collection Locations
October 2019
Executive Summary
7
Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2) ............... .............................12
Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2) .............. .............................13
Figure 5. Recommended Speed Hump Placement
14
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- b - 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data
October 2019
Executive Summary
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- i3 - 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
APPENDICES
Appendix A Speed and Volume Data
Appendix B MUTCD Speed Hump Signage and Pavement Markings
Appendix C NCDOT Comments and Responses
October 2019
Executive Summary
I ZBoard of Commissioners 7 February 3, 2020 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
� ITEM: 10 -'13 - 13
Section 1
Executive Summary
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 14
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document summarizes vehicle speed and volume data and provides traffic calming
recommendations for neighborhood roadways within the Vineyard Plantation community in New
Hanover County, North Carolina, at the request of the homeowners association and Premier
Management Company. The study area roadways are currently maintained by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation ( NCDOT)— accordingly, this study was performed per scoping discussions
with NCDOT Division 3 staff and per NCDOT Division 3 Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices (Reference
1).
The results of this study indicate 85th- percentile speeds on some neighborhood roadways are currently
in excess of the posted speed limit and are documented along with recommendations below.
FINDINGS
Riesling Avenue
■ An average of 1,344 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from
May 11 through May 17, 2018.
■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 32 miles per hour (mph), more than 5 mph
above the posted speed limit.
■ Approximately 4.4 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph.
Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
■ An average of 412 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from
May 11 through May 17, 2018.
■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph.
■ Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph.
Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive
■ An average of 424 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from
May 11 through May 17, 2018.
• The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 24 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph.
• Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 43 - 15 Kittelson &Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
Winery Way
October 2019
Executive Summary
■ An average of 512 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from
May 11 through May 17, 2018.
■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph.
■ Approximately 2.5 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Riesling Avenue
• Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway.
• Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles
traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit.
• Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
• Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines
would not be enforceable to non - residents.
• Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive
■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the
posted speed.
Winery Way
■ Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles
traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit.
■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- ?3 - 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
October 2019
Executive Summary
■ Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines
would not be enforceable to non - residents.
■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- b - 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Section 2
Introduction
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 18
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Residents of the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood in New Hanover County, North Carolina have
identified speeding on several neighborhood roadways that has created a potential safety and traffic
noise issue. This document was prepared for the neighborhood homeowners association (HOA) and
Premier Management Company in response to these concerns. Figure 1 displays the site vicinity map.
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) staff visited the project area on May 8, 2018 and met with
representatives from the HOA and Premier Management Company. Existing roadway widths, pavement
markings, signage, parking, and traffic conditions were confirmed during this field visit. Additionally,
HOA representatives identified areas with prior speeding issues and assisted with identifying locations
for tube data collection (explained in more detail in the next section).
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
The scope of this report was developed in accordance with NCDOT guidance and per discussions with
NCDOT Division 3 staff at a formal scoping meeting held on August 15, 2019. Traffic speed and volume
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 9f3 - 19 Kittelson &Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
October 2019
Introduction
data were collected at the following locations within the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood at the
direction of the HOA:
• Riesling Avenue
• Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
• Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive
• Winery Way
These roadways serve approximately 90 homes within Vineyard Plantation and are also used by
residents outside Vineyard Plantation to access the homes between Jadewood Drive and Futch Creek
Road. Additionally, the HOA identified Riesling Avenue as a popular shortcut between Futch Creek Road
and Porters Neck Road as an alternative to the longer Champ Davis Road. The cross section of each of
these roadways consists of two 10 -foot lanes with no curbs, bicycle lanes /paths, or sidewalks.
The exact placement of the tube data collection locations along these roadways is displayed in Figure 2.
This report is organized as follows:
• Data collection and summary
• Description of traffic calming measures
• Recommended traffic calming measures and placement
• Conclusion
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- f3 - 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
and Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
op
t r
OP
fll.
L i
�Q
0A. * F
7 �- ,ri
Data Collection Location
KITTELSON
Board of Commissioners & ASSOCIATES - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 21
October 2019
1-&_T » �
1
Data Collection Locations Figure
Wilmington, NC 2
Section 3
Data Collection and Summary
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 22
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
DATA COLLECTION AND SUMMARY
October 2019
Data Collection and Summary
Traffic speed and volume data were collected at the study locations for the seven -day period from May
11 through May 17, 2018. Table 1 summarizes the speed and volume data, including the following
elements:
■ Posted speed limit: the posted speed limit is 25 mph throughout the study area.
■ 85th- percentile speed: this is the speed at which 85 percent of vehicles travel at or below
and is typically used as a rule -of -thumb for setting posted speed limits.
■ Percent of speeds above 35 mph: vehicles traveling at 10 mph or more above the posted
speed limit.
■ Average daily traffic: the average number of vehicles per day over the seven -day data
collection period.
Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data
For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue:
■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or
■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit.
As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed
limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one
percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit,
while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more
than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a
speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data
collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Location
Riesling Avenue
Posted Speed Limit
25 mph
85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds
above 35 mph
32 mph 4.4
Average Daily Traffic
1,344
Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
25 mph
29 mph <0.1
412
Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive
25 mph
24 mph 0.1
424
Winery Way
25 mph
29 mph 2.5
512
For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue:
■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or
■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit.
As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed
limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one
percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit,
while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more
than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a
speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data
collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Section 4
Description of Traffic Calming Measures
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 24
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Description of Traffic Calming Measures
DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
A variety of treatments were considered to reduce speeds on these roadways:
• Centerline and /or edge line pavement markings
• Radar speed displays
• Increased speed enforcement
• Speed humps
• Other traffic calming devices, including street closures, neighborhood traffic circles,
chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and center island narrowing.
These treatments are described in the following sections. Much of the information on these treatments
is derived from Traffic Calming: State of the Practice, published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE - Reference 2).
Pavement Markings
Edge lines can be used to visually narrow the roadway, even if the pavement width is unchanged.
Additionally, a double - yellow centerline can be used in place of a single yellow centerline to narrow the
effective lane width. While lane delineation has been shown to reduce single - vehicle crashes, speed
reduction results are mixed —this is because drivers are potentially as equally likely to increase their
speed with the added perception of safety given by lane delineation as they are to decrease their speed
because of the more narrow lane width. We recommend referring to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD) for all pavement marking implementation (Reference 3).
Pavement markings come in a range of costs varying from $0.50 to $2.00 per linear foot, with the more
durable and retroreflective markings having a higher initial cost. While pavement markings on low -
volume roadways like the subject roadways typically have a longer lifespan, the need to restripe every
five to ten years makes this strategy potentially more expensive than other traffic calming measures.
Because of the relatively high cost and low potential to decrease speeds, this treatment is not
recommended.
Radar Speed Displays
The use of radar speed displays or "feedback" signage is a method to remind drivers that they are
speeding and encourage compliance with the posted speed limit. These displays are typically mounted
on a portable trailer equipped with radar speed detection and can be rotated to different roadways
within the neighborhood (Figure 3). They can also be permanently installed on sign posts.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- �b - 25 Kittelson &Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Description of Traffic Calming Measures
Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2)
Radar speed displays can be relatively inexpensive compared to other more permanent traffic calming
measures, especially if the community already owns a trailer or other mounting device. While radar
speed displays have been shown to decrease speeds while in place, their residual effect after being
removed is negligible. The HOA should consider placing feedback signs on the study area roadways in
combination with other traffic calming measures.
Speed Enforcement
Vineyard Plantation is under New Hanover County jurisdiction, but the size of the County and the
relatively low traffic volume on the neighborhood roadways could make it challenging for public safety
officials to enforce speeds on neighborhood roadways.
Another option is for the HOA to take legal steps to potentially implement photo speed enforcement
that would issue fines to violators. Like radar speed displays, photo speed enforcement units are
typically portable to increase effectiveness and mitigate vandalism. Research has shown this strategy to
be effective at reducing speeds both on enforced roadways and adjacent unenforced roadways due to
the "halo" effect, whereby drivers change their behavior. Because of the high expense to deploy and
operate a photo speed enforcement system, as well as the need to combat legal challenges, this
strategy is usually only cost - effective on high - volume roadways where fees help offset maintenance
expenses. Additionally, while the HOA could fine their own residents, it is unlikely the HOA could
successfully fine visiting or "cut- through" drivers. If speeding issues on the study roadways persist, then
we recommend the HOA explore the use of photo speed enforcement within the neighborhood.
Speed Humps
One of the most widely -used traffic calming measures, engineered speed humps are typically designed
to be 12 to 14 feet in length, three to four inches in height, spaced at 300 to 600 feet apart, and
comfortably negotiable at an 851h- percentile speed of 15 to 20 mph, per NCDOT guidelines
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10-'123 - 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Description of Traffic Calming Measures
(Reference 1). It has become more common in practice to limit speed humps to 3.5 inches because
taller speed bumps increase the probability of damage to the vehicle suspension. The 12 -foot length
guarantees that a passenger vehicle cannot straddle the hump, thereby reducing the likelihood of
bottoming out. The advantage of this treatment is its low cost — typically $500 to $1,000 per location —
and self- enforcing design. Unlike speed bumps, which are more abrupt and are falling out of use, speed
humps do not damage vehicle alignment or suspensions, nor do they cause much discomfort when
negotiated at a proper speed.
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has produced a recommended practice for the design of
the 12 -foot speed hump (currently the only traffic calming device with a universally- accepted set of
guidelines), and this is consistent with County regulations (References 3 and 4, respectively). Typically,
speed humps feature a parabolic cross section (Figure 4) and are spaced 600 to 800 feet apart,
depending on the area. Speed humps are more often applied as a "network- wide" measure to control
speeds and less so in isolated situations.
J 0.64 iM 1.75 2.22 2.64 3.W 3.31 3-58 3.75 3.89 3.97 4.00' if -- 4' Speed Hunt/
0 156 1.07 15,3 1.94 2.31 2.63 2.89 3.11 3.28 3.40 3.48 3.50'+e 3.5' Spaed Fiume
0 0.48 0.92 131 1.67 1.% 2,25 2.46 287 281 292 298 3.00' ma X SPBW Hump
Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2)
One potential disadvantage of speed humps is their permanence and the expense of removal if
problems arise. Another critical consideration is that speed hump placement must be sensitive to areas
such as driveways, fire hydrants, utilities, and drainage systems (in particular, near intersections). Most
importantly, speed humps should be designed, signed, and marked so that they do not become a safety
hazard —the MUTCD contains guidance for signing and marking speed humps (Reference 3). Figure 5
shows a concept layout for the potential placement of the speed humps (with consideration to spacing,
driveways, intersections, and area context) on Riesling Avenue, where the highest 85th- percentile
speeds were observed'. A total of three speed humps is recommended, spaced evenly (approximately
every 300 feet) along Riesling Avenue between Chablis Way and Futch Creek Road. Speed humps
should be appropriately signed and marked per the MUTCD —this guidance is contained in Appendix B.
Additionally, NCDOT requires speed humps be placed at least 200 feet from intersections.
1 Note that this is purely a conceptual layout and is not intended to be used for design. The placement of each speed
hump should be carefully considered individually to avoid the sensitive areas mentioned above.
I� Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10 -1133 - 27 Kittelson &Associates, Inc.
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
„ Z
r
l /
F K /
aKi1 V
l I el
j
1
SCALE �?
0 200' 400'
October 2019
- Speed Hump
Ili/Fl KITTELSON
Board of Commissioners N & ASSOCIATES - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 28
+'C.,:� T4°i L� is Gu W1..-
Ov
Recommended Speed Hump Placement
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Figure
5
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019
Description of Traffic Calming Measures
Other Traffic Calming Devices
NCDOT Division 3 provides guidance on a number of other potential traffic calming devices, including
street closures, neighborhood traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and
center island narrowing. Each of these options were explored as potential solutions, but none are
recommended for the study area roadways.
Additional Traffic Control Devices
Currently all of the intersections along the study area roadways are two -way stop controlled. While
conversion to all -way stop control is not on the list of traffic calming measures suggested by ITE or
NCDOT Division 3 guidelines, the HOA has requested consideration of this treatment as a method to
deter cut - through traffic, including at the following intersections:
■ Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way
■ Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way
■ Winery Way /Peppermint Drive
Note the MUTCD explicitly states that all -way stop signs should not be used for speed control but that it
can be an applicable form of traffic control for two residential neighborhood collector streets of similar
design and operating characteristics where traffic operations would be better than two -way stop
control (Reference 3). From an examination of the tube count data summarized in this report, changing
these intersections to all -way stop control is expected to cause minimal delays on the currently
uncontrolled approaches.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 't% - 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Section 5
Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 30
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
October 2019
Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement
RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND
PLACEMENT
Riesling Avenue
• Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway.
• Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles
traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit.
• Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
• Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines
would not be enforceable to non - residents.
• Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way
■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive
■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the
posted speed.
Winery Way
• Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles
traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit.
• Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their
speeds.
• Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines
would not be enforceable to non - residents.
• Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive
intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- �73 - 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Section 6
References
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 13 - 32
Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment
REFERENCES
NCDOT Division 3. Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices. 2016.
2. Ewing, R. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers:
Washington, DC, 1999.
October 2019
References
3. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways. USDOT: McLean, VA, 2009.
4. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps
and Speed Tables. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 2011.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 10- 't% - 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Senior Planner
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth and Wayne Clark, Planning and Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Text Amendment Request (TA19 -04) - Request by New Hanover County to Amend the Zoning Ordinance,
Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance - the Proposed Amendment Will Clarify Provisions to Reflect Current
Practice and Reorganize and Consolidate the Separate Codes into a Unified Development Ordinance
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The proposed amendment, which consolidates five existing development codes into one unified format, is the
culmination of the second phase of the county's development code update, the first phase of which was the addition
of eight new zoning districts in July 2019. This phase is not intended to change the regulations that apply to properties;
it is a reorganization and clarification of current practices that will provide the ordinance structure needed for the
targeted code updates in phase three of the project.
Hard copies of the proposed Unified Development Ordinance document are included in the Board of Commissioners
agenda packets. A digital version of the document and background information can be found
at https: // planning .nhcgov.com /udo /documents /.
In addition to consolidating the five ordinances outlined above, the proposed Unified Development Ordinance
reserves sections for the county's Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Ordinances. These codes will
be added into the document through amendments later this year to incorporate the updates approved by the board in
December and any changes to regulations that result from the stormwater services program.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile
Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances into one unified
development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan
because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the
proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the
county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11
SCRIPT for Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height
Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances Text Amendment JAI 9-04)
Request by New Hanover County to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile
Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage
Prevention Ordinance. The proposed amendment will clarify provisions to reflect current practice and
reorganize and consolidate the separate codes into a Unified Development Ordinance.
I. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then any supporters and any opponents
will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentations and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff /Applicant presentation
b. Supporters' presentation(s) (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponents' presentation(s) (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponents' rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Vote on amendment. The motion should include a statement saying how the amendment is, or is not, consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and why it is, or is not, reasonable and in the public interest.
Options for Motions:
• Motion to approve the text amendment as presented in the staff summary or a modified
version of the text amendment;
• Motion to "table" the item in order to receive more information; or
• Motion to deny the amendment proposal based on specific reasons, such as the proposal is not
consistent with the land use plan and /or the proposal is not reasonable and /or the proposal is
not in the public interest.
Staff Suggested Motion:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile
Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances into one unified
development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan
because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the
proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the
county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users.
Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial:
I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed amendment to New Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision,
Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances.
I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because
[insert reasons]
I also find [Approval /Denial] of the proposed amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because
[insert reasons]
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 1 - 1
STAFF REPORT FOR TAI 9 -04
TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: TAI 9-04
Request:
To amend the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. The
proposed amendment will clarify provisions to reflect current practice and reorganize and
consolidate the separate codes into a Unified Development Ordinance.
Applicant:
Subject Ordinances:
New Hanover County
Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance,
Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance, Airport Height Restriction
Ordinance, and Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance
Purpose & Intent
• To reorganize the existing code into one document without changing regulations
• To update provisions to reflect current practice and laws
• To clarify current practices
BACKGROUND
This amendment, which consolidates five existing development codes into one unified format, is the
result of the second phase of the "UDO Project" development code update. This unified format, a
Unified Development Ordinance, is one book that contains all of a jurisdiction's locally - adopted
development regulations in one place. It's organized so that all of the regulations work together
and makes it easier for property owners and other users to find the information they need. Several
of the jurisdictions around New Hanover County — Wilmington, Brunswick County, Pender County —
have been using a unified format for many years (the most recent, Pender County's, was adopted
in July 2010), and people who own and develop land in our jurisdiction are familiar with using this
type of document.
Reorganization
Currently, the county has seven separate ordinances that regulate development within the county's
planning jurisdiction (not including the NC Building Code, which is not included as part of this project).
Because they are separate regulations and were adopted at different times, they do not always
work together very well —for instance, they may provide different definitions for the same terms.
A separate code format can also make it difficult for someone to understand what they can and
cannot do with their property, as they may have to consult several documents regarding regulations
and required procedures.
TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 2 - 1
Page 1 of 3
The proposed reorganization of existing codes into one unified document will provide the
framework needed for the targeted code updates staff will be preparing over the coming months.
It will make it easier to change standards without inadvertently causing conflicts with another code
or altering the use of terms. The reorganized format will also promote updates that are integrated
with existing provisions so standards, such as for lighting or signs, are not repeated in multiple
sections of the code.
In addition to consolidating the five ordinances outlined above, the proposed Unified Development
Ordinance reserves sections for the county's Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater
Ordinances. These codes will be added into the document through amendments later this year to
incorporate the updates approved by the board in December and any changes to regulations that
result from the stormwater services program discussion.
The attached summary sheets indicate the current location of the provisions in each article of the
proposed reorganized code document.
Updates
With the reorganization of the code, some updates were made to provisions that, because of their
age, are no longer consistent with current practice or laws. For instance, when the Zoning Ordinance
was originally adopted in 1969, the building inspector was part of the planning department and
held some zoning duties. As a result, the current ordinance still indicates that the building inspector
enforces zoning rules, a role that is now the responsibility of the zoning compliance officials.
The attached summary sheets highlight updates to current provisions.
Clarifications
Clarifications of current practices are also included in the reorganized code document. Existing
provisions do not always clearly articulate how a provision has historically been interpreted. For
instance, when the Zoning Ordinance was originally written, the business model for an "Automobile
Service Station" included repairs, fuel sales, and towing operations. Over the past fifty years,
however, this type of use has evolved, with fuel sales now common in conjunction with grocery stores,
for instance. So the proposed amendment, separates these uses out to make permissions more
apparent to code users.
The attached summary sheets identify where clarifications have been made.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The proposed reorganized document is available at https: / /planning.nhcgov.com /udo /documents /.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board considered this request at their December 5, 2019 meeting. The Board
recommended approval of the Unified Development Ordinance draft submitted for your review.
The Board recommended approval (5 -0), finding the proposed amendment consolidating New
Hanover County's Zoning, Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction,
and Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances to be CONSISTENT with the purpose and intent of the
2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the framework for the code updates the plan
recommends. The Board also found APPROVAL of the proposed reorganized code reasonable
and in the public interest because it clarifies the current practices in the county's development
regulations for stakeholders and code users.
TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9 Page 2 of 3
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 2 - 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed amendment consolidating New Hanover County's Zoning,
Subdivision, Mobile Home and Travel Trailer, Airport Height Restriction, and Flood Damage
Prevention Ordinances into one unified development ordinance. I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purpose and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide the
framework for the code updates the plan recommends. I also find APPROVAL of the
proposed reorganized code reasonable and in the public interest because it clarifies the
current practices in the county's development regulations for stakeholders and code users.
TA1 9 -01 Staff Report PB 4.4.201 9
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 2 - 3
Page 3 of 3
Article 1: General Provisions
SUMMARY: This article sets out the general legal provisions for the
development code, such as outlining the county's planning
jurisdiction, referencing its authorities to regulate development, and
covering required legal language, like a severability clause.
Updates & Clarifications
• New sections outlining the relationship of this ordinance with the
Comprehensive Plan (Section 1.5) and provisions for the transition
between the old development codes and the ordinance (Section
1.7) have been added.
• The current development codes do not include some of the legal
provisions that are generally included in a development code. As
a result, new language has been added regarding the general
purpose and intent of the ordinance (Section 1.3) and the
authority to make technical corrections (Section 1.9).
• Some sections have been updated to reflect current practice or
requirements of law that may differ from what was in place when
the codes were originally adopted.
o One statement of general authority is included, as currently
each development - related code has its own reference to a
legal authority. (Section 1.2: Authority)
o Language clarifying that bona fide farm exemptions do not
apply to flood ordinance requirements and reflecting the
state's subdivision exemptions for court - ordered
subdivisions is included. (Section 1.4: Applicability and
Jurisdiction)
o Language currently in Section 65 of the Subdivision
Ordinance has been updated to clarify that the county does
not have the authority per state law to enforce private
agreements, restrictive covenants, or deed restrictions.
(Section 1.6: Relationship with Other Laws)
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Article 1, Section 10: Authority
• Article 1, Section 11: Jurisdiction
• Article 1, Section 12: Title
• Article 3, Section 32: Application
of District Regulations
Subdivision Ordinance
• Article 1, Section 10: Authority
• Article 1, Section 12: Jurisdiction
Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance
• Section I: Authority
• Section II: Jurisdiction
• Section III: Title
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11-3- 1
Article 2: Measurements and Definitions
SUMMARY: This article outlines the way dimensional standards,
such as setback and height, are measured; outlines the rules that
should be used for interpreting provisions of the ordinance, such as
the difference between words like "shall" and "may "; and defines the
terms used in the code.
Updates & Clarifications
• This article has been reorganized to separate measurements from
the definitions of other terms.
• Definitions not currently located in the definitions section in the
current Zoning Ordinance have been moved to this article.
• The definitions for terms have been updated to include:
o Clarifying the difference between the way the terms "yard"
and "setback" are used,
o Providing a definition for each use included on the Table of
Permitted Uses,
o Moving portions of definitions that include regulatory
language (e.g., the requirements home occupations must
follow) to the use standards in Article 4,
o Updating the definition of site specific development plans to
clarify that performance residential developments, major
and minor site plans, and master planned developments are
included and are eligible for vesting, and
o Reorganizing how the words are listed (i.e., separately as
opposed to grouped under a heading) to make them easier
to find.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Article 2, Definitions
• Section 54.1: Exceptional Design
Zoning District (EDZD)
• Section 54.3: RFMU, Riverfront
Mixed Use District
• Section 55.1: COD Conservation
Overlay District
Subdivision Ordinance
• Article II: Definitions and
Interpretations
Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance
• Section IV: Definitions
Airport Height Restriction Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 2
• Article II: Definitions and
Interpretations
Article 3: Zoning Districts
SUMMARY: This article outlines how the Official Zoning Map works, how
district boundaries are interpreted, and lists the purpose and standards
for each zoning district.
Updates & Clarifications
• Language is included to clarify that water bodies are zoned based on the
zoning of the adjacent land. (Section 3.1.1.C: Rules for Interpretation of
District Boundaries)
• Provisions allowing for a digital Official Zoning Map have been added.
(Section 3.1.1: Official Zoning Map)
• Intent statements for each category of zoning district (residential,
commercial, etc.) are included.
• Individual zoning districts' purpose statements and district names have
been updated.
• Photographs of typical development and graphics depicting
dimensional standards have been added for each district.
• Street side setback standards currently located in the definition for "Lot
Frontage" have been added to each district's table of dimensional
standards.
• Open space requirements for the new RMF districts have been clarified.
• The district specific standards for EDZD and RFMU have been
reorganized so provisions are easier to find and understand.
• The procedure for approving Shopping Center districts is clarified.
• The current Conservation Overlay District requires environmental
resource protection standards based on a map that has not been
updated in over two decades. To clarify how these provisions apply to
particular properties, the conservation standards have been moved to
Article 5: General Development Standards and will no longer be treated
as a zoning overlay. The standards will apply whenever the natural
resource is present on a property.
• Standards currently listed as general development standards in the
Zoning Ordinance that apply to zoning districts rather than uses listed
on the Table of Permitted Uses (such as the number of inoperative
vehicles allowed on a residential lot) have been moved to this article.
• The term "High Density Development" has been changed to "Additional
Dwelling Allowance" to more accurately reflect the intent of this
provision. The current term can be misleading, as it only results in low
to moderate density developments in four of the five districts where
allowed.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 3
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Article II, Section 23:
Definitions
• Article V, District
Regulations
• Section 63: Additional
Restrictions Imposed on
Uses Permitted by Right
Article 4: Uses and Use - Specific Standards
SUMMARY: This article includes the tables that show which uses are
allowed in each zoning district and the standards that apply to
individual uses, such as size limits or additional buffers.
Updates & Clarifications
• Currently, the zoning ordinance only includes one table of
permitted uses, but some uses are treated differently depending
on whether they are permanent, temporary, or accessory to a
principal use. To make sure these differences are clear, this article
contains three different tables of permitted uses: one for primary
uses, one for accessory uses, and one for temporary uses.
• Recent court decisions have been made specifying that uses not
specifically listed in an ordinance cannot be prohibited. As a
result, new language has been included that outlines how new
uses will be interpreted based on new use classifications and clear
interpretation criteria.
• Use terms have been updated to
o Reflect modern usage (e.g. Bar /Nightclub instead of
Cabaret, Disco);
o Clarify historic interpretations (e.g., Automobile Service
Station includes Car Wash and Fuel Sales); and
o Merge some use terms that do not need to be separated
(e.g., General Building Contractor, General Contractors
Other Than Building, Landscaping Contractors, and Special
Trade Contractors).
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Article II, Section 23: Definitions
• Article V, Section 50:
Establishment of Use District
• Article VI, Section 63: Additional
Restrictions Imposed on Uses
Permitted by Right
• Article VII, Section 72: Additional
Restrictions Imposed on Certain
Special Uses
Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance
• Section IV: Definitions
• Section VII: Specifications for
Mobile Home Parks
• Section VIII: Travel Trailer Park
Specifications
• Section IX: Registration
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 4
Article 5: General Development Standards
SUMMARY: This article includes general standards for new
development, such as lighting, parking, and landscaping
requirements. It also includes provisions regarding tree retention,
protections for conservation resources, and sign regulations.
Updates & Clarifications
• The current Conservation Overlay District requires environmental
resource protection standards based on a map that has not been
updated in over two decades. To clarify how these provisions
apply to particular properties, the conservation standards have
been moved to Article 5: General Development Standards and will
no longer be treated as a zoning overlay. The standards will apply
whenever the natural resource is present on a property.
• Standards for parking, tree retention, and landscaping have been
reorganized so information is easier to find and to clarify current
regulations and historic interpretations.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Section 55.1: COD Conservation
Overlay District
• Article VI, Supplementary District
Regulations
• Section 60: Development
Plans
• Section 61: Traffic
• Section 62: Landscaping
• Article VIII: Off - Street Parking and
Loading
• Article IX: Design Standards for
Signs
Airport Height Restriction Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 5
Article 6: Subdivision Design and Improvements
SUMMARY: This article outlines all provisions for the subdivision of
property, including subdivision design standards, the difference
between minor subdivisions and major subdivisions, and
improvements required as part of the subdivision process (e.g., open
space, fire hydrants, and street lights). It also sets out requirements
for the establishment of Property Owners' Associations.
Updates & Clarifications
• References to regulatory bodies, other county codes, and legal
authorities have been updated.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Subdivision Ordinance
• Article I, Section 15: Purpose
• Article IV, Design Standards
• Article V, Improvements
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 6
Article 1: Stormwater Management
SUMMARY: This article outlines when stormwater permits and
review are required and includes regulations regarding connections
Ito stormwater systems.
Updates & Clarifications
• This section will remain reserved until the updates anticipated to
be included in the stormwater services program process are
complete.
• All development - related provisions in the Stormwater Ordinance
(as updated) will be included in this article, except definitions,
procedures, and design standards, which will be included in other
sections of the code or in administrative manuals.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Stormwater Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 7
Article 8: Erosion and Sedimentation Control
SUMMARY: This article includes the county's requirements for
erosion and sedimentation control during development, including
permits, erosion and sedimentation control plans, and penalties.
Updates & Clarifications
• This section will remain reserved at this time. The county is
authorized to conduct its erosion and sedimentation control
program by the state, and some updates were considered recently
by the Board of Commissioners. The entire Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance will be added to this location in
the reorganized document as part of an upcoming administrative
amendment.
• All provisions of the current Erosion & Sedimentation Control
Ordinance will be included in this article to comply with state
requirements.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Erosion & Sedimentation Control
Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 8
Article 9: Flood Damage Prevention
SUMMARY: This article includes the provisions for the county's flood
damage prevention ordinance, which is required for residents to be
eligible for federal flood insurance. It outlines development
requirements for structures and development activity in each FEMA
designated flood zone, along with definitions, the duties of the
floodplain administrator, the permitting process, and corrective
procedures.
Updates & Clarifications
• Section headings are updated for consistency with the rest of the
Unified Development Ordinance document.
• All provisions in the current Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
will be included in this article to comply with state requirements.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 9
Article 10: Administrative Procedures
SUMMARY: This article outlines the county's advisory and
decision - making bodies and the review procedures for each
type of decision or permit authorized by the development
code (e.g., zoning compliance approvals, variances, special use
permits).
Updates & Clarifications
• Currently, review procedures are outlined in multiple places
in the Zoning Ordinance and other development codes,
which makes it difficult to understand and communicate the
process for reviewing applications. This article compiles and
standardizes current provisions.
• Standardizing procedures will affect some current
provisions, including requiring only one community meeting
for EDZD projects, which is the current practice for RFMU,
UMXZ, and PD projects.
• Procedures are established for processing and reviewing
major and minor site plans, which is a result of the process -
improvement efforts reflected in the county's COAST
permitting platform.
• Public hearing and community meeting notifications are
aligned with the requirements outlined in the state statutes,
which only require notification of property owners.
• Approval authorities have been updated to reflect
organizational changes and current state statutes:
• Provisions for building permits are covered by the
state building code and have been removed from this
ordinance;
• The Planning Director (or his designee) is established
as the primary authority for planning department -
related portions of the ordinance; and
• The Zoning Board of Adjustment is now referred to as
simply the Board of Adjustment.
• Procedures have been updated to reflect current
practices, including:
• Specifying the role of zoning compliance review
within the building permit process,
• Updating the organizations that are represented on
the Technical Review Committee (TRC) and clarifying
its administrative function, and
• Outlining the TRC's role in the review of site plans and
construction drawings.
Board of Commissioners - Febr
ITEM: 11- 3 - 10
Current Location of Code Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Section 54.1: Exceptional Design Zoning
District (EDZD)
• Section 54.2: Planned Development (PD)
District
• Section 54.3: RFMU, Riverfront Mixed
Use District
• Section 54.4: Urban Mixed Use Zoning
(UMXZ) District
• Section 55.2: CUD Conditional Use District
• Section 55.3: CZD Conditional Zoning
District
• Section 61.4: Traffic Impact Analysis
• Section 63.11: Group Homes
• Article VII, Provisions for Uses Allowed as
Special Uses
• Section 109: Vesting Rights and
Development Agreements
• Article X, Administration and Enforcement
• Article XI, Amendments
• Article XII, Board of Adjustment
• Article XIII, Legal Provisions
Subdivision Ordinance
• Article III, Plat Preparation and Approval
Procedure
• Article VI: Administration
Mobile Home & Travel Trailer Park Ordinance
• Section V: Plan Preparation and Approval
Procedures
• Section VI: Issuance of Construction
Permits and Certificate of Occupancy
• Section X: Amendments
Airport Height Restriction Ordinance
• Section VIII: Permits
• Section X: Board of Adjustment
• Section XI: Judicial Review
Article 11: Nonconforming Situations
SUMMARY: This article outlines how development standards relate
to structures and uses that no longer comply with current
regulations, such as lots that do not meet minimum lot requirements
and uses that are no longer allowed in a particular zoning district. Its
provisions include whether nonconforming situations can be
modified and when they must come into compliance with new
standards.
Updates & Clarifications
• Currently, the Zoning Ordinance includes effective dates for
multiple individual standards throughout the code. These dates
are used to help staff determine whether a situation is considered
legally nonconforming. New language references "the ordinance
as amended" instead of listing each individual effective date,
relying on administrative records regarding ordinance changes to
streamline the code.
• Provisions for the expansion on nonconforming industrial uses
have been moved from the industrial zoning district standards to
this section.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Article IV, Non - Conforming
Situations
• Section 53.2: I -1 Light Industrial
District
• Section 53.3: I -2 Heavy Industrial
District
Airport Height Restriction Ordinance
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11-3- 11
• Section VII: Nonconforming Uses
Article 12: Violations and Enforcement
SUMMARY: This article includes the procedures staff use when a
violation of the ordinance occurs and outlines the penalties that they
are authorized to impose.
Updates & Clarifications
• Because the county building inspector was part of the planning
department when the ordinance was first adopted, current
ordinances still list that position as being responsible for some
enforcement actions. This article clarifies these authorities should
belong to the Planning Director or his /her designee.
• Enforcement procedures and penalties for the Mobile Home and
Travel Trailer Park Ordinance now follow the same requirements
as included in the Zoning Ordinance, which will increase civil
penalties from $50 per day to $100 per day. Current links
between Zoning Ordinance standards and provisions for mobile
home and travel trailer parks would already result in zoning
enforcement proceedings, so there should be little practical
impact.
Current Location of Code
Provisions
Zoning Ordinance
• Section 100: Administration and
Enforcement
• Section 131: Complaints
Regarding Violations
• Section 132: Enforcement of
Ordinance
Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park
Ordinance
• Subsection 11.2: Complaints
Regarding Violations
• Subsection 11.3: Enforcement
of Ordinance
Airport Height Restriction Ordinance
• Section IX: Enforcement
• Section XII: Penalties
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 11- 3 - 12
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Additional Items
DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman
CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager
SUBJECT:
Consideration of a Resolution to Honor the Service and Sacrifice of Antonio I. "Tony" Moore
BRIEF SUMMARY.
Antonio I. "Tony" Moore, from Wilmington, NC, lost his life in service to our country on Friday, January 24, 2020, while
deployed in Syria. A resolution has been prepared to honor his service and sacrifice, and to extend sincere sympathy to
his family and friends.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Adopt the resolution.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Recommend approval.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 12
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
RESOLUTION TO HONOR THE SERVICE AND SACRIFICE OF
ANTONIO I "TONY" MOORE
WHEREAS, Antonio I. "Tony" Moore, from Wilmington, North Carolina, enlisted in the United
States Army after graduating from J.T. Hoggard High School, where he played football and was
known to teammates and friends for his "contagious smile;" and
WHEREAS, Army Specialist Moore was in the 363rd Engineer Battalion, 411th Engineer Brigade,
his awards and decorations including the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service
Ribbon; and
WHEREAS, at the age of 22, Army Specialist Moore lost his life in service to our country on Friday,
January 24, while deployed to Syria; and
WHEREAS, Army Specialist Moore served his county bravely and honorably, and as a community
we mourn the loss of our friend, colleague, student, teammate, brother and son; and
WHEREAS, we invite all to give thanks and honor the Moore family and all Gold Star families in
our community at the Gold Star Families Memorial Monument in Hugh MacRae Park, and that
we never forget the sacrifice our service men and women, and their families make.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners
recognizes and honors the service and ultimate sacrifice of Antonio I. "Tony" Moore to his
country and community, and we lift his parents, brothers, sister, grandparents, extended family,
and all who knew and loved him in our thoughts during this difficult time and always. Further, let
it be resolved that, in accordance with North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper's order, flags in New
Hanover County and across the state, will remain at half -staff until sunset on Tuesday, February
4, as a symbol of our gratitude and deepest sympathy.
ADOPTED this the 3rd day of February, 2020.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair
ATTEST:
Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 12- 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Additional Items
DEPARTMENT: County PRESENTER(S): Mary Williams- Stover, Executive Director, NC Council for Women &
Manager Youth Involvement, NC Department of Administration
CONTACT(S): Tufanna L. Bradley, Assistant County Manager
SUBJECT:
Presentation of Letter from Governor Roy Cooper Thanking New Hanover County for Re- establishing the New
Hanover County Commission for Women
BRIEF SUMMARY:
On August 12, 2019, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners adopted the bylaws of a re- established New
Hanover County Commission for Women which was championed by Judge Robin Robinson and Mary Williams- Stover
of the North Carolina Council for Women & Youth Involvement. At the October 21, 2019 New Hanover County Board
of Commissioners meeting, five community members were appointed to serve on the New Hanover County
Commission for Women. The remaining membership of the Commission for Women includes a YWCA designee and
five members, who will be appointed by the City of Wilmington.
Ms. Mary Williams- Stover intends to thank the board for re- establishing the commission and extending a letter to the
board from Governor Roy Cooper.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hear presentation and receive letter.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Hear presentation and receive letter.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Heard presentation and receiveed letter.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 13
Roy Cooper
Governor
Office of the governor
State of Worths Carotina
��z s'rarF 4�i�
February 3, 2020
The Hon. Julia Olson- Boseman, Chair
New Hanover County Commissioners
230 Government Center Dr., Suite 175
Wilmington, N. C. 28403
Dear Julia:
20301 _MaiBervtce Center
Tcateigh, X.C. 276,99 -0301
I am grateful to you and the New Hanover County Commissioners for re-
establishing the New Hanover County Commission for Women. This is a
valuable resource and voice for women in your county.
I look forward to hearing from you about the work the Commission will
be doing to help make North Carolina healthier, better educated and providing
the opportunity to live a more abundant and purposeful life.
Please do not hesitate to contact my office if we can be of assistance to
you in the future.
With kind regards, I am
Very truly yours,
Roy Cooper
�r
RAC /sm , pool—
J
Location; 7te State Cayitol 13uifding, Rafeigh, _XC. 27602
Board of Ctb'I wNss uge8s1- FmIsruary 3, 2020
ITEM: 13- 1 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/3/2020
Additional Items
DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager
CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Wave Interlocal Agreement Amendment 2
BRIEF SUMMARY:
On Friday, January 31, 2020, the City of Wilmington published its agenda for the council meeting Tuesday, February 4
including an item that extends a loan to Wave in the amount of $400,000 and appoints a Wave board of 7 persons: the
city and county manager, the city and county finance officers, and the executive director of the MPO. It also calls for a
meeting of the board Monday, February 10 at 12 p.m. To take effect, the county would need to consider a similar
action agreeing to a loan of $300,000 for Wave and to the appointments. An amendment to the existing interlocal
agreement between the city and the county is attached for board consideration.
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Approve the amendment as drafted.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Approve the amendment as drafted conditioned on the city taking identical action(s) at its meeting February 4. If the
council does not adopt the amendment, then the record should reflect the county's action is null and void.
COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS:
Approved with the addition of a representative from the city and the county 5 -0.
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020
ITEM: 14
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT #2
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT ( #2) is made and entered into this the 4"'
day of February, 2020 by and between the CITY OF WILMINGTON, a municipal corporation of the
State of North Carolina (hereinafter, "City "), and NEW HANOVER COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the State of North Carolina (hereinafter, "County ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2004, and subsequently amended on March 2, 2015, the County and
City entered into that certain Interlocal Agreement known as the ` Interlocal Agreement Between New
Hanover County and the City of Wilmington to Create a Public Transportation Authority and to Jointly
Fund and Support the Authority' (hereinafter "Agreement ");
WHEREAS, Paragraph 16 of the Agreement authorizes the County and City to amend or modify
the Agreement;
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2020, the parties hereto adopted a concurrent resolution for
enhanced public transportation; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend this Agreement to include certain revised terms
regarding the respective rights and obligations of the County and the City to further implement the
referenced concurrent resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained,
and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged
and agreed upon by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 3, Authority position, shall be and is revised such that the existing Authority
Board comprised of eleven (11) members is dissolved and replaced as set forth in the new
Section 3 that shall henceforth read as follows:
"3. Authority Composition. The Authority governing board shall consist of seven (7)
members (or each member's designee). The members shall be the New Hanover County
Manager, the City of Wilmington Manager, the City of Wilmington Attorney, a New
Hanover County Deputy Attorney, the City of Wilmington Finance Director, the New
Hanover County Finance Director, and the Executive Director of the Wilmington Urban
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. The New Hanover County Manager
Page 1 of 4
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 RI-3
ITEM: 14 1 - 1
shall be the Chair and the Wilmington City Manager shall be the Vice -Chair in even -
numbered years. The Wilmington City Manager shall be the Chair and the New Hanover
County Manager shall be the Vice -Chair in odd - numbered years. The board shall hold a
Special Meeting on February 10th at noon at Forden Station, 505 Cando Street in
Wilmington to organize and address issues related to board transition and maintaining
WAVE transit services. Appropriate and timely public notice of this Special Meeting
shall be published by WAVE staff. The Authority board shall appoint a Secretary who
need not be a member of the Authority board."
2. Section 4, Financing and Budgeting, ting, shall and is revised to include the following addition
which shall be placed in series following Section 4 (c):
"(d) Upon execution of this agreement, the City shall loan the Authority a sum of four
hundred thousand ($400,000.00) dollars, without any interest, due and payable on or
before June 30, 2020. Should said debt not be repaid by said date, the City may withhold
any balance due from any City 2021 fiscal year appropriation to the Authority. Upon
execution of this agreement, the County shall loan the Authority a sum of three hundred
thousand ($300,000.00) dollars, without any interest, due and payable on or before June
30, 2020. Should said debt not be repaid by said date, the County may withhold any
balance due from any County 2021 fiscal year appropriation to the Authority.
3. Ongoing Effect. Except as specifically above amended, the original Interlocal Agreement,
with prior Amendment, shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be
executed by their duly authorized officials, the day and year first written above.
Page 2 of 4
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 R14
ITEM: 14 1 - 2
CITY OF WILMINGTON
Bill Saffo, Mayor
ATTEST:
Penelope Spicer - Sidbury, City Clerk [SEAL]
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
I, _ , a Notary Public of County,
North Carolina, certify that Penelope Spicer - Sidbury personally came before me this day and
acknowledged that she is City Clerk of the City of Wilmington, and that by authority duly given
and as the act of the Council, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Mayor, sealed
with its corporate seal and attested by herself as its City Clerk.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of , 2020.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
CERTIFICATION
This instrument has been pre- audited in the manner required by The Local Government Budget
and Fiscal Control Act.
This day of 12020.
Page 3 of 4
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 RI -5
ITEM: 14 1 - 3
City Finance Officer
Page Intentionally Blank
New Hanover County Digital Signature Page Attached Hereto
And Incorporated Herein by Reference
Page 4 of 4
Board of Commissioners - February 3, 2020 R1 -6
ITEM: 14- 1 - 4