HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ20-02 Staff Report BOC 3.9.2020Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 1 of 11
STAFF REPORT FOR Z20-02
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z20-02
Request:
Zoning Map amendment to rezone 15.86 acres from R-20 and B-1 to R-10
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
New Hanover County New Hanover County
Location: Acreage:
3101 Castle Hayne Road 15.86
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R02519-001-011-000 General Residential & Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped The property would be allowed to be
developed in accordance with the R-10 district
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-20 and B-1 R-10
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 2 of 11
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Undeveloped, Single-Family Residential B-1, R-20
East Undeveloped, Agriculture, Single-Family Residential B-1, R-20
South Undeveloped, Single-Family Residential, Gas Station B-1, R-20
West Undeveloped, Single-Family Residential R-20
ZONING HISTORY
July 1, 1974 Initially zoned R-20 and B-1 (Area 10A)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer
Water services are scheduled to be installed along the adjacent portion of
Castle Hayne Road in 2020. Sewer services are approximately one quarter
miles away on Old Mill Road and would require extension to serve the site.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Station Wrightsboro
Schools
Districted for Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New
Hanover High schools.
For more information, see the full School statistics below.
Recreation Optimist Park, Northern Regional Park
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 3 of 11
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
The Conservation Overlay District Map indicates that swamp forest wetlands
may be present on the site. The location of wetlands will be verified and
any impacts addressed through the TRC review process when any specific
developments are proposed.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The property is currently split zoned, with approximately 13.76 acres zoned R-20 and 2.1
acres zoned B-1.
Under the performance residential standards, the portion of the property currently zoned
R-20 would allow up to 26 dwelling units at a maximum density of 1.9 dwelling units per
acre. Under the proposed R-10 district, this property would be permitted up to 52 dwelling
units at maximum density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre.
Much of the Wrightsboro area was zoned R-20 in 1974. At that time, public utilities were
limited and many homes in the unincorporated areas of the County utilized private well and
septic.
The portion of the property zoned B-1 would allow for the development of traditional
commercial uses like restaurants, offices, and retail establishments. Residential uses require
Special Use Permit in the B-1 district. At approximately 2.1 acres, it is estimated that the
portion of the property zoned B-1 could support about 20,000 square feet of commercial
related uses based on a typical 25% building area.
Existing Zoning
Proposed R-10 R-20 (approx 13.76
acres)
B-1 (approx 2.1
acres)
Min Lot Size
(Conventional) 20,000 sf n/a 10,000 sf
Max Density 1.9 du/ac
(Performance) n/a 3.3 du/ac
(Performance)
Max Dwelling
Units for Subject
Property
26
(Performance) n/a 52
(Performance)
Commercial Uses
Limited (ex. kennels,
recreation, and
convenience stores w/
SUP)
Variety of
commercial uses
including retail,
restaurant, and
office.
Limited (ex.
kennels, recreation,
and convenience
stores w/ SUP)
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 4 of 11
Because this is a general map amendment, uses that would be allowed on the property are
those allowed by right or by Special Use Permit in the R-10 district. If approved, the
development of the site must comply with the standards of the R-10 district and other
applicable regulations, including buffering and stormwater standards. Compliance with
these provisions will be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee during the
development review process.
The subject property is owned by New Hanover County. The majority of the property is
being considered for conveyance to a nonprofit organization for a workforce housing
subdivision. The remainder of the property (approx. 1.5 acres) will be reserved for the
development of a possible future fire station.
A northern branch of Ness Creek runs through the property and has been identified as an
AE Floodway. Because of the costs associated with crossing the creek, it is expected
development of the property will be limited to the eastern side of this waterway, leaving
about 4 acres to remain for open space or recreational purposes.
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 5 of 11
The subject site is located in close proximity to the downtown and airport economic hubs,
employment opportunities including GE and N. Kerr Industrial park, and other regional
destinations. In addition, the site is close to three major transportation corridors: MLK Jr.
Parkway, Interstate 40, and Interstate 140.
TRANSPORTATION
Access is provided to the subject property by Castle Hayne Road (NC 133). It is anticipated
the driveway connection for a residential development would align at the intersection of
Castle Hayne Road and Old Mill Road.
As currently zoned, the residential portion of the subject site would be permitted a maximum
of 26 dwelling units under the performance residential standards for the R-20 zoning
district. A detached single-family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the
PM peak hours.
The trips generated from the B-1 portion of the property would vary based on the
commercial use of the site. For general reference, if the B-1 portion of the site was
developed with a typical approximate 25% building footprint, a 20,000 square foot
shopping/strip center or comparable development could be built. Using ITE trip generation
figures, that center would generate an estimated 100 trips in the AM peak and 62 trips in
the PM peak.
The estimated total trips that could be generated from the site as currently zoned is about
120 in the AM peak and 90 in the PM peak.
As a result, the cumulative impact of the proposed rezoning is expected to reduce the
number of trips generated from development of the site. Specifically, 47 single-family
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 6 of 11
homes that could be built under the proposed R-10 zoning are estimated to generate up to
about 47 trips during the peak hours. The possible fire station is expected to have minimal
trip generation during the peak hours due to shift schedules that typically change at 7:00
am.
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM
Typical Development under
Current Zoning:
26 single-family homes
20,000sf commercial 120 AM / 90 PM
Typical Development under
Proposed R-10 Zoning:
47 single-family homes
Fire Station 35 AM / 50 PM
Traffic impacts are analyzed at the time a development is proposed. Any use that increases
the trips generated by 100 in the AM or PM peak hours will be required to conduct a Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA). Even if a TIA is not required, improvements may be required when
any proposed use is reviewed by NCDOT during the driveway permitting process.
Because there have not been any recent TIAs in the area to analyze traffic flow along this
portion of Castle Hayne Road, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for Castle
Hayne Road near the subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily
trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles
take in seconds to pass through an intersection is generally considered a more effective
measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. The volume to capacity ratio
indicates capacity currently exists in this area to accommodate what is expected to be a
net reduction in trips when compared to the existing zoning.
Traffic Counts – 2018
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
Castle Hayne Road 1,000 feet south of
Rockhill Road 14,256 15,860 0.90
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 7 of 11
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
STIP Project U-5863
o Project to widen Castle Hayne Road from I-140 to MLK Parkway.
o Current production schedule for this project is to begin right-of-way acquisition in
2020 and bidding of the project in 2022. However, the draft STIP, which will be
finalized in September, has moved the dates for right-of-way acquisition to 2021
and bidding of the project to 2024.
o This project will widen Castle Hayne Road by adding a center turn lane or median
to certain sections of the Road. Currently the draft plans include the addition of a
center turn lane directly adjacent the subject site.
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 8 of 11
o The project also includes the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Castle
Hayne Road at Oakley Road and Rockhill Road. Both intersections are within a
quarter mile of the subject site.
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed
Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. Wrightsboro
Commons 226 Multi-Family Units Approved January 24, 2019
2023 Build Out Year
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Updating the signal timing at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and North Kerr
Avenue
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Riverside Development
Development Status: Construction has not started at this time.
SCHOOLS
Students generated from this development would be assigned to Wrightsboro Elementary,
Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High schools. Students may apply to attend public
magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
Twenty-six dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-20 zoning base density,
and 52 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 26 dwelling
units
Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school
students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling
unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate
an additional 6.2 students (2.8 elementary, 1.4 middle, and 2.0 high) than if developed
under existing zoning.
*Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student
enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different
housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can
provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which
includes students attending out-of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and
SeaTECH.
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 9 of 11
School Enrollment* and Capacity**—2021-2022 Estimates
*Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020-2021 school year
and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific
program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children’s classrooms
beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms
designated for art and music if the building wasn’t specifically designed with those spaces.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The property contains an AE Floodway and AE Special Flood Hazard Area. The property
does not contain Natural Heritage Areas.
Existence of wetlands will be verified during the development review process for the site.
The property is within the Ness Creek (C;Sw) watershed.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on
the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation), Class III (severe limitation), and Class
IV (unsuitable) soils, however, the site is expected to be served by CFPUA water and sewer.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Level
Total
NHC %
Capacity
School
Enrollment
of Assigned
School
Capacity of
Assigned
School
% of Capacity
of Assigned
School
Funded
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 97% Wrightsboro 547 564 97% None
Middle 107% Holly Shelter 917 934 98% None
High 105% New
Hanover 1532 1648 93% None
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 10 of 11
Future Land Use
Map Place Type
Community Mixed Use & General Residential
Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in
proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately
developed with either place type, allowing site-specific features and
evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered.
Place Type
Description
Community Mixed Use: Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use
development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor
for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office,
retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family
and single-family residential.
General Residential: Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic
and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes.
Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail
spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout.
Types of uses include single-family residential, low-density multi-family
residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational.
Analysis
The subject property is located along Castle Hayne Road, just north of the
fueling station and convenience store at the intersection with Oakley Road.
This intersection is the approximate midpoint between GE to the north and
the Wrightsboro community-level commercial node centered around the
intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. Kerr Avenue to the south. Due to
the existing commercial use and location, this general area is well-suited to
serve as a future neighborhood-level commercial and service node, where
higher density residential developments would be appropriate.
The subject property is designated Community Mixed Use along Castle
Hayne Road and General Residential further west, closer to the existing
single family neighborhoods. This is a common place type designation for
areas along highway corridors and is intended to support more density near
major roads and existing higher-intensity development, with a transition to
lower densities adjacent to existing lower intensity residential
neighborhoods.
The Comprehensive Plan identifies a suggested density range for residential
development in each place type to assist in identifying what might be
appropriate depending on the context of a site and adjacent development
patterns. The base density for the proposed R-10 district would allow 3.3
dwelling units per acre, which is in the middle of the range of the residential
densities outlined as appropriate in General Residential areas and lower
than those (7-10 single family units per acre) indicated for the Community
Mixed Use portion of the property most likely to be developed. While
lower than what is outlined on the Future Land Use Map, the base density in
R-10 could provide a transition between B-1 zoned properties currently
along Castle Hayne Road and the very low density R-20 zoned residential
properties to the west.
Z20-02 Staff Report 3.9.2020 Page 11 of 11
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed R-10 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the
Comprehensive Plan’s intent of providing an orderly transition of residential
densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the
provision of workforce housing on the site.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board considered this application at the February 6, 2020 meeting. One member of
the public spoke in support of the proposal. Four others had questions and concerns regarding
property value and traffic impacts and inquired about the location and availability of sewer
infrastructure if it is extended to the site along Old Mill Road.
The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (6-0), finding it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly
transition between existing lower density residential areas and the Castle Hayne Road corridor
and provides for the provision of workforce housing. The Board also found APPROVAL of the
rezoning is reasonable and in the public interest because it will provide for the provision of
workforce housing on the site and allows densities more appropriate along a major highway
corridor and still compatible with the existing development patterns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning as stated in the Planning Board’s action.
Staff concurs with the Planning Board’s statements that the application is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
Comprehensive Plan’s intent of providing an orderly transition of residential densities
from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of
workforce housing on the site. I find APPROVAL of the rezoning is reasonable and in
the public interest because it will provide for the provision of workforce housing on the
site and allows densities more appropriate along a major highway corridor and still
compatible with the existing development patterns.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
Comprehensive Plan’s intent of providing an orderly transition of residential densities
from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of
workforce housing on the site, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and
in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character
of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhoods.