Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda 2020 06-01
";Y tia NEW HANOVER COUNTY � BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA < A = o Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 3 Z a2 24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC 28401 Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair I Patricia Kusek, Vice -Chair f TAtlLI.tiH eD;i \a Jonathan Barfield, Jr., Commissioner I Woody White, Commissioner I Rob Zapple, Commissioner Chris Coudriet, County Manager I Wanda Copley, County Attorney I Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board JUNE 1, 2020 4:00 P M PLEASE NOTE: The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners will hold its Regular Board Meeting on June 1, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. at the Wilmington Convention Center, 10 Convention Center Drive, Wilmington, NC. Due to the ongoing COVID -19 situation, several precautions will be implemented to allow for recommended social distancing practices. The live meeting will be available on NHCTV.com and NHCTV's cable stations: Spectrum channel 13 and Charter channel 5. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Julia Olson - Boseman) I NVOCATI ON (Pastor Patrick Hall, Cape Fear Free Will Baptist Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Commissioner Rob Zapple) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Second Reading: Approval of Solid Waste Renewal Franchise for Blackburn Hauling & Maintenance 3. Second Reading: Approval of Solid Waste Renewal Franchise for TriCounty Trash 4. Adoption of First National Bank Authorization Resolution 5. Ratification of Application for 2020 Assistance to Firefighters (AFG -S) COVI D- 19 Supplement Funding 6. Adoption of National Men's Health Month Proclamation 7. Adoption of Budget Amendment for the Purchase of FEMA Trailers to Provide Workforce and Affordable Housing in New Hanover County ESTI MATED MINUTES REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 8. PLEASE NOTE: The following procedures will be followed for providing public hearing comments on regular agenda items: Items 9 -11 1. For those who wish to speak at the meeting, several separate areas within the convention center will be set aside for the public to provide for Board of Commissioners - June 1. 2020 recommended social distancing. A podium and free standing microphone will also be provided, both of which will be sanitized after each speaker. 2. For those who wish to provide written comments without attending the meeting, comments may be submitted online at: comments @nhcgov.com. Comments received via the provided link by 3:00 p.m. on June 1, 2020 will be made available to the Board of Commissioners prior to the hearing. I tem 12: No additional public comments will be accepted for this item. Items 13 -14 1. For those who wish to speak at the meeting, several separate areas within the convention center will be set aside for the public to provide for recommended social distancing. A podium and free standing microphone will also be provided, both of which will be sanitized after each speaker. 2. For those who wish to provide written comments without attending the meeting, comments may be submitted online at: https:H planning .nhcgov.com /currentplanning- and - zoning /boards- meetings /public- comment - form /. Comments received via the provided link by noon on May 29, 2020 will be made available to the Board of Commissioners prior to the hearing. 10 9. Public Hearing on Small Business Economic Incentive Grant Program and Adoption of Budget Amendment for FY19 -20 30 10. Public Hearing on the FY 2020 -2021 Recommended Budget (limit three minutes each) 10 11. Public Hearing Economic Development and Economic I ncentives Appropriations (limit three minutes) 40 12. Quasi - Judicial Hearing Special Use Permit Request (519 -02) — Request by Tribute Companies on Behalf of the Property Owner, Coswald, LLC, for a Special Use Permit to Develop Residential Uses Within a Commercial District on Approximately 15.6 Acres of Land Located in the 200 Block of Lendire Road, near the 7200 Block of Market Street 40 13. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, I nc. on Behalf of the Property Owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39 Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to Construct a Residential Development Consisting of Multi- Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing 40 14. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -03) - Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, HD, LLC, to Rezone Approximately 74.83 Acres of Land Located Near the 5800 Block of Carolina Beach Road, North of the Existing Tarin Woods Subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate - High Residential District, in Order to Develop 499 Dwelling Units (97 Single - Family Dwellings and 402 Townhomes) Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes) 15. PLEASE NOTE: The following procedures will be followed for providing public comments on non - agenda items: 1. For those who wish to speak at the meeting, several separate areas within the convention center will be set aside for the public to provide for recommended social distancing. A podium and free standing microphone will also be provided, both of which will be sanitized after each speaker. 2. For those who wish to provide written comments without attending the meeting, comments may be submitted online at: comments @nhcgov.com. Comments received via the provided link by 3:00 p.m. on June 1, 2020 will be read aloud by a staff member at the meeting. ESTI MATED MINUTES ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 16. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney 17. ADJOURN Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Mission New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow. Vision A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come. Core Values Integrity - Accountability - Professionalism - Innovation - Stewardship Board of Commissioners - June 1. 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approve minutes from the following meeting: Regular Meeting held on May 18, 2020 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approve 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: County Attorney PRESENTER(S): Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney CONTACT(S): Kemp Burpeau and Joe Suleyman, Environmental Management Director SUBJECT: Second Reading: Approval of Solid Waste Renewal Franchise for Blackburn Hauling & Maintenance BRIEF SUMMARY: New Hanover County requires a county issued franchise to collect solid waste. Pursuant to Section 44.55, the applicant has provided information about his business organization, equipment, personnel and fiscal responsibility. The Environmental Management Director and the Chief Financial Officer have no objections to the franchise request. The decision to approve the current solid waste franchise agreement was considered against the implications of House Bill 56 and its impact on the county's ability to control the flow of solid waste. Staff believes that private solid waste collection companies will ultimately make post -2020 final disposal decisions based on two factors: price and convenience /location. The New Hanover County landfill is competitive in both areas and will continue to seek methods to control costs while offering cutting -edge services to the public. The renewal franchise period would run for seven years. The first reading was unanimously approved on May 4, 2020. A second reading is required. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve franchise. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 2 BLACKBURN'S HAULING & MAINTENANCE 4716 OLD AVE. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 910 - 675 -0240 11101yiyP.[e]AlauJd_yfftePL0:T►1 WE HAUL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FOR COMMERICAL & RESIDENTIAL. WE HAVE TWO ROLL OFF CONTAINER TRUCKS WITH 52 CONTAINERS. WE HAVE TWO EMPLOYEES THAT WORK FULL TIME. WE HAVE BEEN IN BUSSINESS JANUARY 1, 1998. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS PLEASE CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. SINCERELY YOURS JIMMY BLACKBURN OWNER -SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: County Attorney PRESENTER(S): CONTACT(S): Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney and Joe Suleyman, Environmental Management Director SUBJECT: Second Reading: Approval of Solid Waste Renewal Franchise for TriCounty Trash BRIEF SUMMARY: New Hanover County requires a county issued franchise to collect solid waste. Pursuant to Section 44.55, the applicant has provided information about his business organization, equipment, personnel and fiscal responsibility. The Environmental Management Director and the Chief Financial Officer have no objections to the franchise request. The decision to approve the current solid waste franchise agreement was considered against the implications of House Bill 56 and its impact on the county's ability to control the flow of solid waste. Staff believes that private solid waste collection companies will ultimately make post -2020 final disposal decisions based on two factors: price and convenience /location. The New Hanover County landfill is competitive in both areas and will continue to seek methods to control costs while offering cutting -edge services to the public. The renewal franchise period would run for seven years. The first reading was unanimously approved on May 4, 2020. A second reading is required. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve franchise. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 3 T 413 CLARENDON BLVD. CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 ADM I N@TRICOU NTYTRASH.COM 910.547.9283 Franchise Agreement New Hanover County 44 -55. (c) (1) Tri County Trash LLC 480 Buckingham Ave, Wilmington NC 28428 (2) Equipment List 2002 International 4900 2001 International 4700 1999 International 4700 45 Dumptsers (3) 2 Employees at business (4) 2 years owner of Tri County Trash, 8 years construction waste removal previous to ownership. (5) See Attached P &L (J) Liablity with Able Auto - Representative is Haley Pate Auto, 2 million, with Allstate Lagamarcino— Representative Loreen Moraster .: TRICOUNTYT'RASH.COM Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher SUBJECT: Adoption of First National Bank Authorization Resolution BRIEF SUMMARY: County staff would like to open a money market account with First National Bank to invest a portion of our idle funds that became available when a CD held by the County matured. This fund is currently offering a more competitive rate than reinvesting in the NC Cash Management Trust account. A First National Bank Resolution is needed to update the names on file and open the account. This resolution authorizes Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer, and Martha Wayne, Deputy Chief Financial Officer, as the authorized representatives and allows them the authority to execute all appropriate documents for the account. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend board's adoption of the First National Bank Authorization Resolution. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 4 4 f�_ ENTITY AUTHORIZATION JE 0 GFR FI !!tf I. J [.� r G— S Or — IXC S-6 tV X_4 -- (AWhorizatl)n Signer's name), certify that: 1 am aithe Gam` r O� � {Aulhairatton signers title) designated to act on behalf of NEW HANOVER COUNTY (Authorizing Entity), Authorizing Entity is a for-,,_ ' Okin (typoof entity, likea`am -profit" corporation) and its Taxpayer Identification Number 56-6000624 . I am authorized and directed to execute an original or a copy of this Authorization to Financial Instit lion, and anyone else requiring a copy. Authorizing Entity is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of �A�-� �{G1r and is duly qualified, validly existing and in good standing in all jurisdictions where Authorizing Entity operates or owns or leases property. Authorizing Entity has the power and authority to provide this Authorization, to confer the powers granted in this Authorization and to carry on Authorizing Entity's business and activities as now conducted. The designated Agents have the power and authority to exercise the actions specified in this Authorization and Authorizing Entity properly adopted these authorizations and appointed the Agents and me to act on its behalf. Authorizing Entity will notify Financial Institution before reorganizing, merging, consolidating, recapitalizing dissolving or otherwise materially changing ownership, management or organizational form. Authorizing Entity will be fully liable for failing to notify Financial institution of these material changes. D Authorizing Entity conducts business and other activities under the additional trade name or fictitious name of and Authorizing Entity has the legal power and authority to use this trade name or fictitious name. Authorizing Entity will not use any trade name or fictitious name without Financial Institution's prior written consent and will preserve Authorizing Entity's existing name, trade names, fictitious names and franchises. GENERAL AUTHORIZATIONS. I certify Authorizing Entity authorizes and agrees that: FIRST NATIONAL BANK (Financial Institution) is designated to provide Authorizing Entity the financial accommodations indicated in this Authorization, subject to the Financial Institution's rules and regulations from time to time. Ali prior transactions obligating Authorizing Entity to Financial Institution by or on behalf of Authorizing Entity are ratified by execution of this Authorization. Any Agent, while acting on behalf of Authorizing Entity, is authorized, subject to any expressed restrictions, to make all other arrangements with Financial Institution which are necessary for the effective exercise of the powers indicated within this Authorization. The signatures of the Agents are conclusive evidence of their authority to act on behalf of Authorizing Entity. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, this Authorization replaces any earlier related Authorization and will remain effective until Financial Institution receives and records an express written notice of its revocation, modification or replacement. Any revocation, modification or replacement of this Authorization must be accompanied by documentation, satisfactory to Financial Institution, establishing the authority for the change. Authorizing Entity agrees not to combine proceeds from collateral securing any debts owed to Financial Institution with unrelated funds. SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATIONS. The following persons (Agents) are authorized to act on behalf of Authorizing Entity in fulfilling the purposes of this Authorization: Individual's Name, Title, & if applicable, Representative Entity's Name and Relationship to Authorizing Entity (a)L►Sa�Lt,�7���%� af. (c) (d) (e) Signature or Facsimile Signature (f) Authorizing Entity has adopted any facsimile signatures indicated above. Financial Institution may rely on those facsimile signatures that resemble the specimens within this Authorization or the specimens that Authorizing Entity periodically files with Financial Institution, regardless of by whom or by what means the signatures were affixed. Authorizing Entity authorizes and directs the designated Agents to act, as indicated, on Authorizing Entity's behalf to: (indicate a, b, c, d, a and/or f to exercise each specific power): Open or close any share or deposit accounts in Authorizing Entity's name, including, without limitation, accounts such as share draft, checking, savings, certificates of deposit or term share accounts, escrow, demand deposit, reserve, and overdraft line -of- credit accounts. Number of signatures required i Enter into and execute any preauthcrized electronic transfer agreements for automatic withdrawals, deposits or transfers initiated through an electronic ATM or point -of -sale terminal, telephone, computer or magnetic tape using an access device like an ATM or debit card, a code or other similar means. Number of signatures required Enter into and execute commercial wire transfer agreements that authorize transfers by telephone or other communication systems through the network chosen by Financial Institution. Number of signatures required Endorse for cash, deposit, negotiation, collection or discount by Financial Institution any and all deposit checks, drafts, certificates of deposit and other instruments and orders for the payment of money owned or held by Trust. Number of signatures required Gaily Aulhorizal ion Brokers Systems TM VMPO wooers Klwrer Financial SMices 02014 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1 VMPC591 (1402),00 AUTH431 lTY 2/112014 Page 1 of 2 Sign checks or orders for the payment of money, withdraw or transfer funds on deposit with you. If Authorizing Entity authorizes and Financial Institution accepts this power with a multiple signature limitation, Authorizing Entity agrees to waive the multiple signatures requirement for any withdrawal in a format that does not allow Financial Institution an opportunity to examine signatures. Number of signatures required Enter into and execute a written night depository agreement, a lock -box agreement or a safe deposit box lease agreement. Number of signatures required Borrow money or obtain other credit or financial accommodation from Financial Institution on behalf of and in the name of Authorizing Entity on the terms agreed to with Financial Institution. The designated Agents may execute and endorse promissory notes, acceptances or other evidences of indebtedness. ❑ If checked, the maximum outstanding credit limit for all available credit and financial accommodation to Authorizing Entity from Financial Institution must not exceed $ . Number of signatures required Grant a security interest, lien or other encumbrance to Financial Institution in any or all real or personal property that Authorizing Entity now owns or may acquire in the future for the payment or performance of: ❑ Specific Debts. The debts, liabilities and obligations, and their renewals, extensions, refinancing and modifications, evidenced by (doscribe): ❑ All Debts. All debts, liabilities and obligations of every type and description owed now or in the future by Authorizing Entity to Financial Institution. Number of signatures required Receive and acknowledge receipt for funds, whether payable to the order of Authorizing Entity or an Agent, without additional certification as to the use of the proceeds. Number of signatures required Guaranty the payment and performance of debts, liabilities and obligations owed to Financial Institution or its successors and assigns by (Borrower): ❑ Specific Debts. The debts, liabilities and obligations, and their renewals, extensions, refinancing and modifications, evidenced by (describe): ❑ All Debts. All debts, liabilities and obligations, and their renewals, extensions, refinancing and modifications, that Borrower owes now or in the future to Financial Institution, to the extent allowed by law. Number of Signatures required ❑ Grant a Security Interest. The designated Agents may also grant a security interest, lien or other encumbrance to Financial Institution in any or all real or personal property that Authorizing Entity now owns or may acquire in the future for the payment or performance of this guaranty. Number of signatures required Periodically amend, restructure, renew, extend, modify, substitute or terminate any agreements or arrangements with y Financial Institution that relate to this Authorization. Number of signatures required Execute other agreements that Financial Institution may require, and perform or cause to be performed any further action necessary to carry out the purposes of this Authorization. Number of signatures required Other (specify) Number of signatures required INTERPRETATION. Whenever used, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. The section headings are for convenience only and are not to be used to interpret or define the terms of this Authorization. SIGNATURES. By signing, I certify and agree to the terms contained in this Authorization on behalf of Authorizing Entity on . I also acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Authorization. Pennsylvania. The designation of an Agent does not create a power of attorney; therefore, Agents are not subject to the provisions of 20 Pa.C.S.A. Section 5601 et seq. (Chapter 56; Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries Code) unless the agency was created by a separate power of attorney. Any provision that assigns Financial Institution rights to act on behalf of any person or entity is not subject to the provisions of 20 Pa.C.S.A. Section 5601 et seq. (Chapter 56; Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries Code). AUTHORIZATION'S SIGNERS: By B Name ate y Attest: Flame Date FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION USE ONLY Acct /Loan # 122764102 Authorization and agreement completed and effective 05/07/2020 By VICTOR ALEXANDER for the Rnancial Institution. Entity Authorization Bankers Systems TM VMPG Wolters Kluwer Fintmial Services 0 2014 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 4 - 1 - 2 VMPC591 (1402).00 AUTKENTITY 21112014 Page 2 of 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Fire Services PRESENTER(S): Donnie Hall, Fire Chief CONTACT(S): Donnie Hall and Frank Meyer, Deputy Fire Chief SUBJECT: Ratification of Application for 2020 Assistance to Firefighters (AFG -S) COVID -19 Supplement Funding BRIEF SUMMARY: Fire Rescue requests board approval to ratify the 2020 FEMA Assistance to Firefighters COVID -19 Supplement Grant application requesting funding to purchase personal protective, testing, and disinfecting equipment. The request includes N95 masks, surgical masks, isolation gowns, safety glasses, and adapters with cartridges to allow use of existing respirator equipment for COVI D -19 protection. Also included are an AeroClave and a portable shelter which provides the ability to disinfect rooms, equipment, and apparatus at any location. This equipment will further provide a comprehensive package to ensure first responder protection, wellness and safety. The total project cost for equipment is $76,870. The local cost share is $6,989 and the Federal Funding Assistance total is $69,882. The local cost share will be part of the FY21 budget. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Request ratification of 2020 AFG -S COVI D -19 Supplement Grant application submittal. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 5 2020 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program Supplemental AFG -S COVID -19 Item Quantity Vendor Unit of Measure Cost Grant Request AeroClave Equipment 1 AeroClave, LLC each $15,743 $ 15,743 Decontamination Shelter with HVAC 1 Deployed Logix each $24,275 $ 24,275 Respirator Adapter 100 Grainger or Newton's Fire Safety each $ 134 $ 13,384 Respirater Adapter Cartridges 200 Grainger or Newton's Fire Safety each $ 66 $ 13,192 Fit Test Machine 2 Grainger each $ 315 $ 630 N95 Masks 75 Grainger box of 20 = 1500 each $ 100 $ 7,500 Surgical Masks 3 -Ply 30 Amazon box of 50 = 1500 each $ 28 $ 840 Isolation Gowns 20 Grainger Package of 50 = 1000 each $ 34 $ 670 Safety Glasses 1 200 lGrainger each 1 $ 3 $ 636 Grant Request Total $ 76,870 NHCO 10% Cost Share $ (6,988) Federal Funding Assistance $ 69,882 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Carla Turner, Personal Health Services Manaager CONTACT(S): Carla Turner SUBJECT: Adoption of National Men's Health Month Proclamation BRIEF SUMMARY: Men's Health Month is recognized nationally in June. Men are encouraged to increase awareness of men's health issues and participate in preventative screenings. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the proclamation. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NATIONAL MEN'S HEALTH MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, despite advances in medical technology and research, men continue to live an average of five years less than women; and WHEREAS, educating the public and our health care providers about the importance of a healthy lifestyle and early detection of male health problems can help to reduce the mortality from disease; and WHEREAS, men who are educated about the value of preventive health to prolong their lifespan and support their role as productive family members are more likely to participate in health screenings; and WHEREAS, Men's Health Month is an opportunity to raise awareness, advocate resources, and promote access to education about men's health. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that June 2020 will be recognized as "National Men's Month" in New Hanover County. All citizens are encouraged to increase their awareness of the importance of a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise and medical checkups, and to participate in preventive health practices and early detection efforts to join the campaign and become concerned about men's health with the hope of achieving optimum health for both today and tomorrow. The Commissioners recommend all citizens and community organizations to join in this observance. ADOPTED this the 1St day of June, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Strategy PRESENTER(S): JD Limberger, Senior Strategy and Continuous Improvement Analyst CONTACT(S): JD Limberger and Jennifer Rigby, Strategy and Policy Coordinator SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Amendment for the Purchase of FEMA Trailers to Provide Workforce and Affordable Housing in New Hanover County BRIEF SUMMARY: After Hurricane Florence, FEMA placed emergency mobile home units within New Hanover County as part of the Direct Housing Program. As of 05/19/20, there are 22 FEMA mobile home units remaining in the county. Typically, these units would be removed by FEMA from New Hanover County once the Direct Housing Program is completed. In order to continue to provide workforce and affordable housing in New Hanover County for disaster - related victims, staff has worked with FEMA and the existing mobile home park property owner to retain these units in New Hanover County. FEMA is requesting that New Hanover County purchase these 22 units for the agreed upon price of $391,000 and the mobile home park property owner has agreed to purchase these units from New Hanover County for $391,000. This sale would include 6 -one bedroom units, 5 -two bedroom units, and 11 -three bedroom units. Consistent with General Statute, Statutory Authority for a Private Sale for Workforce Housing -160A -267 and 153A -378, New Hanover County will have the following conditions to the sale: For a minimum period of twelve months' duration, the units must be occupied, rented, or sold solely to persons qualified as eligible for low and moderate housing under HUD rules and regulations. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the ordinance for Budget Amendment 20 -076. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0 with amended contract language to extend the minimum period of twelve months' duration to thirty -six months' duration that the units must be occupied, rented, or sold solely to persons qualified as eligible for low and moderate housing under HUD rules and regulations. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 7 AGENDA: June 1, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 BUDGET BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment(s) be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Intelligent Growth & Economic Development Strategic Objective(s): Encourage development of complete communities in the unincorporated county Fund: General Department: Strategy Expenditure: Decrease Increase Total BA 20 -076 FEMA Trailers $ 391,000 $ 391,000 Total $ - 1 $ 391,00011$ 391,000 Revenue: Decrease Increase Total BA 20 -076 Sale of Fixed Assets $ 391,000 $ 391,000 Total $ - $ 391,000 $ 391,000 Prior to Actions Today Departmental Budget $ 5,102,400 Total if Actions Taken $ 5,493,400 Section 2: Explanation BA 20 -076 After Hurricane Florence, FEMA placed emergency mobile home units within New Hanover County as part of the Direct Housing Program. As of 05/19/20, there are 22 FEMA mobile home units remaining in the county. Typically, these units would be removed by FEMA from New Hanover County once the Direct Housing Program is completed. In order to continue to provide workforce and affordable housing in New Hanover County for disaster - related victims, staff has worked with FEMA and the existing mobile home park property owner to retain these units in New Hanover County. FEMA is requesting that New Hanover County purchase these 22 units for the agreed upon price of $391,000 and the mobile home park property owner has agreed to purchase these units from New Hanover County for $391,000. This sale would include 6 -one bedroom units, 5 -two bedroom units, and 11 -three bedroom units. Consistent with General Statute, Statutory Authority for a Private Sale for Workforce Housing -160A -267 and 153A -378, New Hanover County will have the following conditions to the sale: For a minimum period of 12 months' duration, the units must be occupied, rented, or sold solely to persons qualified as eligible for low and moderate housing under HUD rules and regulations. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment(s) 20 -076 amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, is adopted. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1 Adopted, this 1 st day of June, 2020. (SEAL) Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Finance PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Small Business Economic Incentive Grant Program and Adoption of Budget Amendment for FY19 -20 BRIEF SUMMARY: North Carolina received $4 billion from the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). Subsequently, through N.C. Session Law 2020 -4, New Hanover County was allocated $4,064,953 to be applied toward expenses incurred to respond to COVI D -19 from March 1 through December 30, 2020. At the May 18, 2020 Board of Commissioners meeting, the board approved the following spending plan for these funds: • COVI D -19 response expenses already incurred by the county: $954,951 • Reimbursements to City and Beach Towns for their expenses to respond to COVI D -19: $401,042 • County payroll costs for response to COVI D -19: $720,000 • Continued staffing costs for testing and COVI D -19 call center support: $60,000 • Meals and planning for aging population most at risk for COVI D -19: $50,000 • Costs to boost county's Wi -Fi signal at county locations identified as priority locations by New Hanover County Schools: $20,000 • Costs for cleaning and social distancing at county and municipal facilities and playgrounds: $370,000 • Costs for additional supplies and expenses related to COVI D -19: $188,960 • Small Business Economic Incentive Grant program: $1,300,000 The small business grant program will provide economic incentive grants of $10,000 to economically distressed businesses for the purpose of addressing pandemic public impacts and business interruption on hiring /rehiring residents, business retention within New Hanover County, and /or premises expenditures to enhance public hygiene and safety. Since this is an economic incentive program, a public hearing is required prior to appropriating funds for this purpose pursuant to N.C. General Statute 158 -7.1. These funds will be appropriated in the current fiscal year. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Authorize expenditure of $1,300,000 for economic development purposes and adopt the ordinance for Budget Amendment 20 -069. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Conduct public hearing. Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 Conducted public hearing, approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 SCRIPT FOR AGENDA ITEM JUNE 1, 2020 CHAIRMAN OLSON- BOSEMAN: I will now open a public hearing to receive comments on appropriations and expenditures for economic development for the Covid -19 small business economic incentive grants. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the General Fund, using CARES Act monies. The purposes of economic development and economic incentive agreements are to increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output, or business prospects for New Hanover County. The economic development expenditure that follows have been recommended for appropriation in the FY19 -20 budget and are under consideration for adoption. COVID -19 small business economic incentive grants to economically distressed businesses, $1,300,000. These grants serve the purpose of addressing pandemic public impacts and business interruption on hiring /rehiring residents, business retention within New Hanover County, and /or premises expenditures to enhance public hygiene and safety in the amount of $10,000 per grant award. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) as appropriated to the State of North Carolina and subsequently allocated to New Hanover County via N.C. Session Law 2020 -4. Hear comments, if any, including written comments received to date. I will now close the public hearing. Is there a motion to approve the economic development appropriations and expenditures for Covid -19 small business economic incentive grants based on the finding that the appropriations and expenditures will increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output, or business prospects of the County? Motion: Second: Vote Staff is directed to do any and all things necessary to finalize the Covid -19 small business economic incentive grants economic incentive appropriations and expenditures. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 1 - 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2020 AT 4:00 P.M., OR THEREAFTER, AT THE WILMINGTON CONVENTION CENTER, 10 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE, WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING PUBLIC COMMENT ON APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS. THE PURPOSES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS ARE TO INCREASE THE POPULATION, TAXABLE PROPERTY, AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES, EMPLOYMENT, INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT OR BUSINESS PROSPECTS FOR NEW HANOVER COUNTY. FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 -2021, THE COUNTY IS CONSIDERING APPROPRIATING THE FOLLOWING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /INCENTIVE EXPENDITURES AS PART OF THE FY20- 21 BUDGET: The Arts Council of Wilmington /New Hanover County, $6,500, Support arts - driven economic development activities to increase attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Cape Fear Council of Governments Continuum of Care for Homelessness, $25,000, An alliance of service providers, local government agencies, and other public interests whose common goal is the reduction and ultimate elimination of homelessness; Cucalorus Film Foundation, $13,000, Support seasonal staff for the Cucalorus Festival (Film, Stage, Connect) events which encourage visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Friends of Fort Fisher, $4,550, Support educational programs to increase visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Highway 17 Transportation Association in NC Inc., $3,250, Work regularly with the NC General Assembly, the Board of Transportation and NCDOT leadership to make prioritization and funding for rural, eastern projects more equitable; Southeastern Economic Development Commission, $18,240, Assist with project development necessary for the solicitation of grant funding from the Economic Development Administration (EDA); The Southeastern Partnership, Inc., $20,000, Provide regional and targeted industry specific marketing and conduct familiarization events; Wilmington Business Development, $205,949, Provide recruitment /assistance for business expansion and /or relocation efforts; Wilmington Downtown, Inc., $42,250, Provide activities to increase the number of businesses, jobs and tax base in Wilmington's Urban Core; and Wilmington Regional Film Commission, $131,457, Promote /assist TV and film production activities to drive local entertainment business growth, support local production infrastructure and businesses. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the General Fund of the county. The following is an incentive payment that was previously board approved as outlined in incentive agreement contracts to be paid upon the company meeting specified investment /job requirements: National Gypsum, $70,000. The source of funding for this incentive payment appropriation and expenditure will be from the General Fund of the county. THE COUNTY IS ALSO CONSIDERING APPROPRATING THE FOLLOWING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /INCENTIVE EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 -2020: COVID -19 small business economic incentive grants to economically distressed businesses, $1,300,000. These grants serve the purpose of addressing pandemic public impacts and business interruption on hiring /rehiring residents, business retention within New Hanover County, and /or premises expenditures to enhance public hygiene and safety in the amount of $10,000 per grant award. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the federal Coronavirus Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 1 Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) as appropriated to the State of North Carolina and subsequently allocated to New Hanover County via N.C. Session Law 2020 -4. THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THESE AGREEMENTS AT THE ABOVE STATED TIME AND PLACE, OR BY EMAILING: COMMENTS @NHCGOV.COM, AND /OR IN- PERSON AT THE JUNE 1, 2020 PUBLIC HEARING IF CONTINGENCIES AFFORD SUCH IN- PERSON OPPORTUNITY. THE EMAILED PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED BY 3:00 P.M. ON JUNE 1, 2020 WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED TO COMMENT AND BE HEARD. In accordance with NCGS 166A, Article 1A, Public Bodies /Remote Meetings During Declared Emergencies, if applicable, the Board will hold the public hearing but may choose not to vote on this public hearing item on June 1, 2020, and instead may take action at a recessed or other scheduled meeting. Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners New Hanover County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 2 As a part of the Cares Act Funding, New Hanover County staff recommends providing 130 $10,000 COVID-19 small business economic incentive grants to economically distressed businesses for the purpose of addressing pandemic public impacts and business interruption on hiring /rehiring residents, and/or premises expenditures to enhance public hygiene and safety. Staff recommends working with a third party to receive, process, select applications through a lottery process and distribute funds to businesses. Businesses will be asked to submit applications between June 2nd and June 5th to a third party. If a business is randomly selected, it will be notified and they will have 48 hours to submit verified documentation of their application and banking information. The information will be verified and reviewed for completeness. These funds must be spent by December 30, 2020 and can only be used for payroll to hire and rehire employees or for additional expenditures related to the business complying with State and Local orders to be COVD -19 compliant. These funds may not be used for rent, utilities, or expenditures related to normal business operations outside of payroll. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 3 - 1 AGENDA: June 1, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 BUDGET BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment(s) be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Superior Public Health & Safety Strategic Objective(s): Sustain the community capacity to prepare for and respond to public safety demands Fund: General Department: 911 Communications Expenditure: Decrease Increase 11 Total BA20 -069 CARES Act expenditures $ 4,064,953 11 $ 4,064,953 Total $ - $ 4,064,953 $ 4,064,953 Revenue: Decrease I Increase 11 Total BA20 -069 CARES Act allocation 1 $ 4,064,953 $ 4,064,953 Total $ - 1 $ 4,064,953 $ 4,064,953 Prior to Actions Total if Actions Today Taken Departmental Budget $ 7,886,219_j F$ 11,951,172 Section 2: Explanation BA 20 -069 appropriates funds from the federal CARES Act that were allocated to North Carolina. Through N.C. Session Law 2020 -4, New Hanover County received an allocation of $4,064,953 to be applied toward expenses incurred to respond to COVID -19 from March 1 through December 30, 2020. This funding will be used in accordance with the spending plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment(s) & amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, is adopted. Adopted, this 1st day of June, 2020. (SEAL) Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 4 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Budget PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Sheryl Kelly, Budget Officer SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the FY 2020 -2021 Recommended Budget (limit three minutes each) BRIEF SUMMARY: Pursuant to General Statute 159- 12(b), before adopting the budget ordinance, the board shall hold a public hearing at which time persons who wish to be heard on the budget may appear. This public hearing on the FY 2020 -2021 Recommended Budget meets these requirements. Estimated Minutes Agency 3 minutes New Hanover County Schools 3 minutes Cape Fear Community College 3 minutes Other Agencies /I ndividuals RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Conduct public hearing. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Conduct public hearing. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Conducted public hearing. Adopted the FY2020 -2021 Budget Ordinance 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 10 SCRIPT FOR AGENDA ITEM June 1, 2020 Chairman Olson - Boseman: Pursuant to General Statute 159- 12(b), before adopting the budget ordinance, the board shall hold a public hearing at which time any persons who wish to be heard on the budget may appear. This public hearing on the FY2020 -2021 Recommended Budget meets these requirements. The Board will now hear public comments and open the floor to Board discussion. Hear comments, if any, including written comments received to date. I will now close the public hearing. Is there a motion to adopt the FY2020 -2021 Budget Ordinance? Motion: Second: Vote: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 10-1 -1 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY RECOMMENDED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 -2021 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. THE BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BUDGET ON MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2020 AT 4:00 P.M., OR THEREAFTER, AT THE WILMINGTON CONVENTION CENTER, 10 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE, WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA. A COPY OF THE RECOMMENDED BUDGET IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE AT THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, AND ON THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY WEBSITE: WWW.NHCGOV.COM. THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE FY20 -21 BUDGET AT THE ABOVE STATED TIME AND PLACE, OR BY EMAILING: COMMENTSgNHCGOV.COMn, AND /OR IN— PERSON AT THE JUNE 1, 2020 PUBLIC HEARING IF CONTINGENCIES AFFORD SUCH IN— PERSON OPPORTUNITY. THE EMAILED PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED BY 3:00 P.M. ON JUNE 1, 2020 WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD DURING THE PUBLIC Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 1 HEARING. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED TO COMMENT AND BE HEARD. In accordance with NCGS 166A, Article 1A, Public Bodies /Remote Meetings During Declared Emergencies, if applicable, the Board will hold the public hearing but may choose not to vote on this public hearing item on June 1, 2020, and instead may take action at a recessed or other scheduled meeting. Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners New Hanover County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Budget PRESENTER(S): Lisa Wurtzbacher, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Sheryl Kelly, Budget Officer and Kemp Burpeau, Deputy County Attorney SUBJECT: Public Hearing Economic Development and Economic Incentives Appropriations (limit three minutes) BRIEF SUMMARY: Consistent with General Statute 158 -7.1, the Board of County Commissioners is required to notify the public at least 10 days prior to conducting a public hearing for every appropriation or expenditure related to economic development. In addition to the procedural requirements, elected boards are also required to make a specific finding prior to approving any appropriation or expenditure for economic development that the appropriation or expenditure will "increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output or business prospects of the city of county." The following economic development expenditures have been recommended for appropriation in the FY20 -21 budget and are under consideration for adoption. If, after conducting the public hearing, the board finds that the appropriations /expenditures identified below will increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output or business prospects for New Hanover County, and the board appropriates the items identified below as part of the FY2020 -2021 Adopted Budget, then no additional board action will be required to expend the funds. New incentives, appropriations or expenditures, or subsequent increases, will require public notice and another public hearing. Economic Development Agencies /Organizations These appropriations will be funded from General Fund revenues of the county. Organization Amount Description of Activities /Expense The Arts Council of $6,500 Support arts- driven economic development activities to increase Wilmington /New Hanover attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy County Cape Fear Council of $25,000 An alliance of service providers, local government agencies, and other Governments Continuum of public interests whose common goal is the reduction and ultimate Care for Homelessness elimination of homelessness Cucalorus Film Foundation $13,000 Support seasonal staff for the Cucalorus Festival (Film, State, Connect) events which encourage visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy Friends of Fort Fisher $4,550 Support educational programs to increase visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 11 Highway 17 Transportation $3,250 Work regularly with the NC General Assembly, the Board of Association in NC, Inc. Transportation and NCDOT leadership to make prioritization and funding for rural, eastern projects more equitable ------- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------- :Southeastern Economic ;$18,240 Assist with project development necessary for the solicitation of grant :Development Commission funding from the Economic Development Administration (EDA) r -- - - - - -- -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - - -- -- r - - -- - --- - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- - -- -- -- :The Southeastern Partnership, ;$20,000 Provide regional and targeted industry specific marketi ng and conduct ;Inc. familiarization events r-------------------------------- - - - - -- r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilmington Business ;$205,949; Provide recruitment /assistance for business expansion and /or relocation :Development efforts :Wilmington Downtown, Inc. :$42,250 'Provide activities to increase the number of businesses, jobs and tax base in Wilmington's Urban Core --------------------------------------- 11 -----------r--------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----- :Wilmington Regional Film ;$131,457 :Promote /assist TV and film production activities to drive local :Commission entertainment business growth, support local production infrastructure and businesses Previously Approved Contractual Incentive Payments The following incentive payment was previously board approved as outlined in the incentive agreement contract to be paid upon the company meeting specified investment /job requirements: National Gypsum, up to $70,000. This appropriation will be funded from General Fund revenues of the county. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Conduct public hearing. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Conduct public hearing. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Conducted public hearing. Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 11 SCRIPT FOR AGENDA ITEM JUNE 1, 2020 CHAIRMAN OLSON- BOSEMAN: I will now open a public hearing to receive comments on appropriations and expenditures for economic development. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the General Fund. The purposes of economic development and economic incentive agreements are to increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output, or business prospects for New Hanover County. The economic development expenditures that follow have been recommended for appropriation in the FY20 -21 budget and are under consideration for adoption. The public is invited to comment on the following appropriations and expenditures as shown on the screen: • Economic Development Agencies /Organizations • Previously Approved Contractual Incentive Payments Hear comments, if any, including written comments received to date. I will now close the public hearing. Is there a motion to approve the economic development appropriations and expenditures based on the finding that the appropriations and expenditures will increase the population, taxable property, agricultural industries, employment, industrial output, or business prospects of the County? Motion: Second: Vote Staff is directed to do any and all things necessary to finalize the economic incentive appropriations and expenditures. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 11-1 -1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2020 AT 4:00 P.M., OR THEREAFTER, AT THE WILMINGTON CONVENTION CENTER, 10 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE, WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING PUBLIC COMMENT ON APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS. THE PURPOSES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS ARE TO INCREASE THE POPULATION, TAXABLE PROPERTY, AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES, EMPLOYMENT, INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT OR BUSINESS PROSPECTS FOR NEW HANOVER COUNTY. FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 -2021, THE COUNTY IS CONSIDERING APPROPRIATING THE FOLLOWING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /INCENTIVE EXPENDITURES AS PART OF THE FY20- 21 BUDGET: The Arts Council of Wilmington /New Hanover County, $6,500, Support arts - driven economic development activities to increase attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Cape Fear Council of Governments Continuum of Care for Homelessness, $25,000, An alliance of service providers, local government agencies, and other public interests whose common goal is the reduction and ultimate elimination of homelessness; Cucalorus Film Foundation, $13,000, Support seasonal staff for the Cucalorus Festival (Film, Stage, Connect) events which encourage visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Friends of Fort Fisher, $4,550, Support educational programs to increase visitor /tourist attendance and encourage increased spending in the local economy; Highway 17 Transportation Association in NC Inc., $3,250, Work regularly with the NC General Assembly, the Board of Transportation and NCDOT leadership to make prioritization and funding for rural, eastern projects more equitable; Southeastern Economic Development Commission, $18,240, Assist with project development necessary for the solicitation of grant funding from the Economic Development Administration (EDA); The Southeastern Partnership, Inc., $20,000, Provide regional and targeted industry specific marketing and conduct familiarization events; Wilmington Business Development, $205,949, Provide recruitment /assistance for business expansion and /or relocation efforts; Wilmington Downtown, Inc., $42,250, Provide activities to increase the number of businesses, jobs and tax base in Wilmington's Urban Core; and Wilmington Regional Film Commission, $131,457, Promote /assist TV and film production activities to drive local entertainment business growth, support local production infrastructure and businesses. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the General Fund of the county. The following is an incentive payment that was previously board approved as outlined in incentive agreement contracts to be paid upon the company meeting specified investment /job requirements: National Gypsum, $70,000. The source of funding for this incentive payment appropriation and expenditure will be from the General Fund of the county. THE COUNTY IS ALSO CONSIDERING APPROPRATING THE FOLLOWING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT /INCENTIVE EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 -2020: COVID -19 small business economic incentive grants to economically distressed businesses, $1,300,000. These grants serve the purpose of addressing pandemic public impacts and business interruption on hiring /rehiring residents, business retention within New Hanover County, and /or premises expenditures to enhance public hygiene and safety in the amount of $10,000 per grant award. The source of funding for these appropriations and expenditures will be from the federal Coronavirus Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 11- 2 - 1 Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) as appropriated to the State of North Carolina and subsequently allocated to New Hanover County via N.C. Session Law 2020 -4. THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILL RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THESE AGREEMENTS AT THE ABOVE STATED TIME AND PLACE, OR BY EMAILING: COMMENTS @NHCGOV.COM, AND /OR IN- PERSON AT THE JUNE 1, 2020 PUBLIC HEARING IF CONTINGENCIES AFFORD SUCH IN- PERSON OPPORTUNITY. THE EMAILED PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED BY 3:00 P.M. ON JUNE 1, 2020 WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED TO COMMENT AND BE HEARD. In accordance with NCGS 166A, Article 1A, Public Bodies /Remote Meetings During Declared Emergencies, if applicable, the Board will hold the public hearing but may choose not to vote on this public hearing item on June 1, 2020, and instead may take action at a recessed or other scheduled meeting. Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners New Hanover County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 11- 2 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Quasi - Judicial Hearing Special Use Permit Request (S19 -02) — Request by Tribute Companies on Behalf of the Property Owner, Coswald, LLC, for a Special Use Permit to Develop Residential Uses Within a Commercial District on Approximately 15.6 Acres of Land Located in the 200 Block of Lendire Road, near the 7200 Block of Market Street BRIEF SUMMARY: The quasi-judicial public hearing for this item was closed on October 21, 2019. No additional public comment for the item will be taken by the Board at the June 1 meeting. At their March 9 meeting, the Board of Commissioners continued this item to their April 6 meeting. However, the item was not considered at the April 6 or May 4 meetings due to the CO V1 D -19 situation. The Board of Commissioners tabled this item at the October 21, 2019 meeting in order to allow for more information to be provided regarding planned infrastructure improvements near the subject site. Specifically, more information was requested regarding improvements to Lendire Road and to the stormwater drainage system in the area and along Torchwood Boulevard. The information provided by NCDOT, County Engineering, and the applicant regarding these planned improvements is summarized below and in greater detail in the staff report. Lendire Road • NCDOT intends to widen Lendire Road by 8 feet (4 feet on each side) and stripe the road similar to Torchwood Boulevard in conjunction with the Military Cutoff Extension project which is expected to be completed by early 2023. Stormwater Drainage The applicant submitted a preliminary stormwater package to County Engineering for initial review that demonstrated the design will meet the pre /post requirements in relation to the 100 -year storm event in the New Hanover County Stormwater Design Manual. The applicant has conducted multiple site visits and reviewed available County information to confirm that the two stormwater outfalls on the south side of the site under Lendire Road continue through existing ditches to the southwest, ultimately converging in the ditch along Ogden Business Lane. This ditch is conveyed by pipe under the Ogden Baptist Church of Wilmington parking lot and Market Street to an open channel on the southern side of the Publix shopping center parcel that ultimately flows to Howe Creek. The site's outfall does not flow to the west or connect to the Smith Creek basin. The applicant has proposed an additional condition that they will construct culvert improvements under Lendire Road subject to NCDOT approval to effectively remove the subject parcel's site drainage from an existing culvert shared by the neighborhood pond to the west. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12 Torchwood Boulevard County Engineering staff has identified the Smith Creek watershed as one of the first two watersheds that will have debris and sedimentation removed in conjunction with the Emergency Watershed Protection grant awarded to the County in late 2019. Engineering staff estimates that the work will be begin in the summer and take up to approximately 90 days to complete. The grant authorizes a 280 -day completion period. NCDOT completed a hydraulic study that examined the stormwater drainage that will be passing through the future Military Cutoff extension. The report has identified improvements that will help increase the stormwater capacity flowing to Smith Creek. There is an opportunity for the County to partner with NCDOT during the construction of the Military Cutoff extension to install the recommended culverts under the proposed road which would directly benefit the Torchwood area. County Engineering is currently seeking funding sources for the improvements. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Example Motion for Approval: Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application fora Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report, and with the four conditions recommended in the staff report. [OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions. 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. A 6- foot -tall solid wood fence shall be installed within the bufferyard located along the northwestern property line which abuts the Jacobs Ridge neighborhood. 3. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, a 10 -foot multi-use path shall be installed along the site's frontage on Lendire Road and be extended south along the road so that it would connect to the future multi-use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane as part of the Military Cutoff extension project (U- 4751). Installation of the multi-use path shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The applicant is not required to obtain additional right -of -way in order for the multi-use path to be extended to the future multi-use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane. Please see Exhibit 1 for the approximate location of the path to be installed with the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, while not required in order to meet the 100 -year storm event design condition, additional culvert improvements shall be installed under Lendire Road to further enhance the existing drainage infrastructure, subject to NCDOT approval. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal: 1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. [State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons to why it is not being met] Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with the four conditions in the staff report unless greater weight of the competent and material evidence presented during the public hearing suggests that one or more of the required conclusions cannot be met. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: The item was denied 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12 SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application (S19 -02) Request by Tribute Companies on behalf of the property owner, Coswald, LLC, for a special use permit to develop residential uses within a commercial district on approximately 15.6 acres of land located in the 200 block of Lendire Road, near the 7200 block of Market Street. 1. This item was continued at the October 21, 2019 meeting in order gather more information regarding Lendire Road improvements and stormwater issues. We will hear a presentation from staff on the requested items. Representatives from our Engineering Department and NCDOT are also available to answer any questions. 2. Swear in staff and the representatives from NCDOT. 3. Staff presentation on requested items 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the Special Use Permit application. Motion to approve the permit - All findings are positive. ❑ Motion to approve the permit, subject to conditions specified below: (State Conditions) 13 Motion to deny the permit because the Board cannot find: F1a. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed for the following reason: Mb. That the use meets all required condition and specifications: c. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity: d. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 1 - 1 Example Motion for Approval: Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report, and with the four conditions recommended in the staff report. Recommended Conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. A 6-foot-tall solid wood fence shall be installed within the bufferyard located along the northwestern property line which abuts the Jacobs Ridge neighborhood. 3. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, a 10 -foot multi -use path shall be installed along the site's frontage on Lendire Road and be extended south along the road so that it would connect to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane as part of the Military Cutoff extension project (U- 4751). Installation of the multi -use path shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The applicant is not required to obtain additional right -of -way in order for the multi -use path to be extended to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane. Please see Exhibit 1 for the approximate location of the path to be installed with the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, additional culvert improvements shall be installed under Lendire Road that will remove the subject site's drainage through the existing pipe shared by the neighborhood to the west. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal: 1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. (State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons to why it is not being met] STAFF REPORT FOR S19 -02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICATION UPDATE • The Board of Commissioners tabled this item at the October 21, 2019 meeting for 90 days in order to gather more information regarding Lendire Road improvements and stormwater issues. The item was then continued at the March 9 meeting, and has been delayed due to the COVID-19 situation. • The information provided by NCDOT, County Engineering, and the applicant regarding these planned improvements is summarized below. Lendire Road • NCDOT has plans to make improvements to Lendire Road with the ongoing Military Cutoff Extension project. The improvements consist widening the road with the addition of 4 feet of asphalt to each side of the road for a total widening of 8 feet. The widening of the road will be from Ogden Business Lane to the Military Cutoff right -of -way. This portion of the road will also be striped similar to Torchwood Boulevard. NCDOT previously intended the work to be completed in 2020, however, due to the COVID -19 situation, the exact timeframe of the widening cannot be determined at this time. The improvements will be completed with the Military Cutoff Extension project which is expected to be completed by early 2023. • The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the project also projects that 5% of the trips generated by the development will utilize Lendire Road west of the site (about 90 daily trips). An engineering report conducted by ECS Southeast, LLP, stated that "... the additional traffic from the development will not degrade the existing pavement section beyond its designed life span." In addition, "...construction traffic will be routed on Middle Sound Extension to Market Street and will not use Lendire Road to exit the proposed development." Stormwater Drainage • The applicant's team has worked with New Hanover County Engineering, conducting multiple site visits to confirm information on outfall and drainage basin details for the subject site. Using this information, a preliminary stormwater package was submitted to County Engineering for initial review that demonstrated the design will meet the pre /post requirements in relation to the 1 00 -year storm event in the New Hanover County Stormwater Design Manual. Coordination with the NCDOT Market Street improvements have also occurred to insure that NCDOT will not be discharging any stormwater on the subject property. • Through multiple site visits and available County information it has been confirmed that the two stormwater outfalls on the south side of the site under Lendire Road continue through existing ditches to the southwest, ultimately converging in the ditch along Ogden Business Lane. This ditch is conveyed by pipe under the Ogden Baptist Church of Wilmington parking lot and Market Street to an open channel on the southern side of the Publix shopping center parcel that ultimately flows to Howe Creek. The site's outfall does not flow to the west or connect to the Smith Creek basin. • The applicant has proposed an additional condition that they will construct culvert improvements under Lendire Road subject to NCDOT approval to effectively remove the S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 1 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 1 subject parcel's site drainage from an existing culvert shared by the neighborhood pond to the west. The design of this pipe will meet the requirements set forth in the NCDOT design guidelines. According to the applicant's Engineer, this, in conjunction with meeting the 100 - year storm in the on -site ponds, confirms the project will have no adverse effect on stormwater upstream or downstream from this site. Smith Creek Subject Site Pages Creek General Direction of s � a. l _ Drt�inage i=10 \� ��„p9�lt..+• �. �t�tc`f`-`e w� v OK Middle Sound Loop Road ON Howe Creek Downstream Outfah Torchwood Boulevard • Although the project's downstream stormwater outfall has been determined to flow south to Howe Creek and away from Torchwood Boulevard, many residents expressed concerns regarding flooding that occurs on Torchwood near the Glen Ridge subdivision. • County Engineering staff has identified the Smith Creek watershed, which includes Glen Ridge subdivision, as one of the first two watersheds that will have debris and sedimentation removed in conjunction with the Emergency Watershed Protection grant awarded to the County in late 2019. Engineering staff estimates that the work will be begin in the summer and take up to 90 days to complete. The grant authorizes a 280 -day completion period. • In conjunction with the Military Cutoff Extension project, NCDOT completed a hydraulic study that examined the stormwater drainage that will be passing through the future roadway. The report has identified improvements that will help increase the stormwater capacity flowing to Smith Creek. The proposed improvements include cleaning out and enlarging existing ditches, removing undersized culverts, and installing additional culverts. • There is an opportunity for the County to partner with NCDOT during the construction of the Military Cutoff extension to install the recommended culverts under the proposed road which would directly benefit the Torchwood area. County Engineering is currently seeking funding sources for the improvements. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 2 Page 2 of 21 NCDOT's Hydraulic Report Recommendations (highlighted w/ staff markups): 519 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 3 Page 3 of 21 Creeks eligible for funding from the Emergency Watershed Protection Grant (in blue): Holly Shelte I� Creek I Prince 10 %� Creek cam, s Fishing Creek � m� Liock� y04 Creek Ness Creek i W � Q ?�N Smith Creek s � 1 I I I Barnare Creek Mott � S�pEPS / I Lords Creek i I I' I Telfai I Island Creek v 4F � y Pages Creek Howe Whiskey Hewletts 4 Creek Cree k / / W 8` k • +(r P 4 �Q / / Everette / Creek / J � V / a / w � Watersheds 1 I Creeks I I / I / Creek t y _ Creek I / r 519 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 4 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 4 RESIDENTIAL USES IN A COMMERICAL DISTRICT SUP OVERVIEW • The Zoning Ordinance allows for dwelling units to be permitted in the B -1 or B -2 zoning district with a Special Use Permit provided the units are part of a mixed -use development. • The mixed -use development should provide for innovative opportunities for an integration of diverse but compatible uses into a single development that is unified by distinguishable design features with amenities and walkways to increase pedestrian activities. • When this option is utilized, commercial uses within the development must be limited to those permitted in the B -1 district, even for sites zoned B -2. The B -1 district permits traditional commercial uses, like retail establishments, restaurants, and offices. The heavy commercial /light industrial type uses allowed in the B -2 district are prohibited under the specific standards for this Special Use Permit. • In addition to the conceptual site plan, applications for this type the SUP must include architectural elevations and a conceptual lighting plan. APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: S19 -02 Request: SUP to allow residential uses within a commercial zoning district as part of a mixed -used development. Applicant: Property Owner(s): Mark Maynard, Jr — Tribute Companies Coswald, LLC Location: Acreage: 200 Block of Lendire Road, near the 7200 Block of 15.6 Market Street PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R04400- 001 - 003 -000 Urban Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped Mixed -Use Development Current Zoning: B -2 S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 5 Page 5 of 21 SURROUNDING AREA July 7, 1972 LAND USE ZONING North Single - Family Residential (Palm Grove), Camping (KOA). R -10, B -2 East Undeveloped, Commercial Services, Ogden Fire Station B -2 South Commercial Services (Recreation Establishments, Restaurants, Retail) B-2 West Single - Family Residential (Jacobs Ridge at West Bay Estates) R -10 Aerial -. '� F /' F�.� � .. � � 9° :. r ' • � �', s �, ter' � �� r. A SUP Boundary Existing Parcel Boundary s „Ls <A a ,aA, C ZONING HISTORY July 7, 1972 Initially zoned R -15 (Area 8B) November 2, 1987 Portions of the parcel rezoned from R -15 to B -2 (Z -321) September 6, 1988 Portions of the parcel rezoned from R -1 5 to B -2 (Z -356) September 4, 1990 Portions of the parcel rezoned from R -15 to B -2 (Z -413) S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 6 Page 6 of 21 COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be Historic determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Ogden Schools Porters Neck Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools *For More Information, see the full School statistics below. Recreation Ogden Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Includes Staff Markups • The proposed mixed -use development will consist of up to 288 dwelling units located within apartment buildings and mixed -use buildings, and approximately 7,500 square feet of commercial building space. The commercial uses proposed are office and retail businesses. The buildings will range from one to three stories and be restricted to a maximum height of 35 feet. S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 7 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 7 • The western boundary of the site, adjacent the Jacob's Ridge at West Bay subdivision, is subject to an increased building setback and bufferyard. The bufferyard will be approximately 50 feet in width and must contain vegetation, or a combination of vegetation and fencing, that provides an opaque screen. The applicant is proposing to install a 6 -foot- tall solid wood fence within the buffer. As shown on the conceptual plan, the buildings will exceed the required setback and be placed about 1 15 feet from the western property line. • The conceptual plan includes two mixed -use buildings located on the southern portion of the site adjacent Lendire Road. The buildings would permit office and retail uses on the ground floor and residential units above the commercial space. One building is proposed to be two stories and contain 4 dwelling units, and the other is proposed to be three stories with 20 dwelling units. The commercial space would total about 7,500 square feet. 9 rE &_ r` 5� Conceptual Rendering of the Three- Sto,-Y • 264 of the proposed dwelling units will be located within 11 three -story apartment buildings. The project will also contain an amenity building and outdoor swimming pool for the residents. • The project will contain 3.62 acres of amenity areas and open space, which equates to approximately 23% of the 15.6 -acre site. Approximately 56% of site will contain impervious surfaces. The stormwater management areas will be located in the southern portion of the site along Lendire Road. • The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 1 00 -year event (-= 10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event (�8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). The site is located at the apex of three drainage basins (Smith Creek, Pages Creek, and Howe Creek). All runoff to the site will be conveyed to the proposed stormwater facility, and will ultimately flow south toward Howe Creek. Although S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 8 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 8 the site was initially thought to drain toward Smith Creek, more detailed analysis of adjacent development plans indicated the downstream outfall flows south toward Howe Creek. Any stormwater that flows into the northern ditch and Market Street today will be conveyed to the new stormwater facility. • The applicant is proposing to incorporate distinguishable design features within the project including consistent architectural design, color scheme, landscaping, park benches, bicycle racks, and street lighting. Sidewalks will be provided throughout the development, allowing residents to walk to existing and future commercial uses in the vicinity. If approved, the distinguishable site features will be verified by TRC during the site plan review. Conceptual Rendering of the Three -Story Apartment Buildings MIS loop EWA ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The subject 15.6 -acre site is part of a larger parcel, approximately 30 acres in size, zoned B -2. The parcel is currently undeveloped. • The "outparcel" shown on the conceptual site plan which is not included in the boundary of the SUP is under contract to be purchased by the applicant. The applicant does not have specific plans for that portion of the property at this time, and thus it is not included in this application, however, they anticipate that the area would be developed for office - related uses. • The site is located within the Market /Middle Sound commercial node, near the intersection of Market Street and Middle Sound Loop Road/Lendire Road. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 9 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 9 • This node contains several commercial businesses including, but not limited to, retail establishments (Publix and Big Lots shopping centers), restaurants ( Odgen Tap Room, Smithfields BBQ, Denny's, Bojangles), personal services (Tame The Mane, The Corner Buzz, dry cleaners), specialty restaurants (Casa Blanca Coffee, Starbucks), and craft beer establishments (Fermental Wine & Beer, The Sour Barn). Ogden Commercial Node Denitys rl[tcw rercrvxn'. + ' Y " FCC • Lr. h. < gA4ECAR, <r _ CIN OGDEn TAP OOM 4F', _06 BIG LOTS. .� fermental p`tio ` Zoning Districts +/f5 B -2 R -1 0 Pubrx O &I R -15 TRANSPORTATION • The subject site will be accessed by Lendire Road (SR -2892) and "Old" Lendire Road, a private access easement. • When estimating traffic impacts of undeveloped sites, staff's general rule based on typical development patterns is that commercial development typically covers about 25% of the site for building area at one story (approximately 170,000 square feet for the subject 15.6 -acre site). In this case the applicant estimates that the site would support about 1 16,000 square feet of shopping center related uses (retail, restaurants, and offices), which is a more conservative market estimate for the property. • According to the applicant, development of the site as currently zoned using their assumption of 1 16,000 square feet of shopping center related uses would generate about 485 trips in the AM peak hours and 540 trips in the PM peak hours. • The proposed project of 288 multi - family units and 7,500 square feet of office /retail space is estimated to generate about 140 trips in the AM peak hours and 190 trips in the PM peak hours. This would result in an estimated decrease of 345 trips in the AM peak hours and 350 trips in the PM peak hours. S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 10 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 10 • The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The approved TIA requires a westbound right turn lane to be installed on Lendire Road at the site's access. Installation of a right - turn lane at the site's access on Lendire Road ••a - •a. - r j 0� r W - �T squired Roadway Improvements • The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable intersections in the area including Lendire Road /Middle Sound Loop Road at Market Street and "Old" Lendire Road at Market Street. The TIA found that the project will slightly increase the time it takes for vehicles to get through these intersections, but it will not reduce the overall LOS of the intersections from the level they are anticipated to operate at in 2021. Market Street at Middlesound Scenario Loop Road/Lendire Road Overall LOS 2019 Existing D 2021 Future E 2021 Future with Project . E , 2019 Existing D 2021 Future E 2021 Future with Project E Market Street at "Old" Lendire Road Scenario LOS of Eastbound Approach to Market Street 2019 Existing D 2021 Future C 2021 Future with Project C 2019 Existing E 2021 Future C 2021 Future with Project C S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 11 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 11 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Impact Traffic . jw�� i �inµpao • isp,�� Approved Under RevIew i Under • 1 STIP Project U -4751 STIP Project U -4902D S19-02 gECD QC. �� {BRA i� oc 84'U_ Middle Sound West TIA Approved m O 3 F Q Wave Bus Stop 0I STIP Project 0 Miles E 0 0.25 0.5 .. 1 Mile Radius V 4`b Yom. {S � Bayshore Commercial TIA Approved � kr•`' s�_POnv� SRGHi [EkF .. � °g. Ogden Starbucks ` TIA Approved Publix Shopping Center TIA Approved 519 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 12 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 12 Nearby NC STIP Projects: STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension) • Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1 -140. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in early - 2023. • The extension of Military Cutoff will run about three quarters of a mile west of the subject site. Lendire Road /Brittany Lakes Drive, Torchwood Boulevard, and Putnam Drive /Bradfield Court will connect to the Military Cutoff extension, allowing access to neighborhoods west of the site. • The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project. • NCDOT recently obtained ownership of Lendire Road from Market Street to the Military Cutoff extension. The connection of Lendire Road to the future Military Cuttoff will allow the road to function as a collector street, however, NCDOT does not have any current plans to make improvements to the road. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 13 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 13 • STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median) • Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5- foot sidewalk on the western side of the street. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in early - 2023. Future Median Breaks of the Market Street Median Signalized Left -Over to Alexander Rd y. Signalized U -Turn Bulb Signalized Full Movement Intersection at Torchwood Blvd/'Bayshore Dr Subject Slte Market Street Median Project W,n Marsh Oaks Cdr Left -Over to Alexander Rd +l. Left -Over to Greenview Dr I t -Over to KOA, Gas tation, Car Wash Signalized Left -Over at Wendover Ln Middle Sound Loop Rd L ,tat,C„ S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 14 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 14 Nearbv Traffic Impact Analvses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 1. Middle Sound West • 288 multi - family units • Approved August 14, 2019 (Subject Site) • Small office with 32 • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable employees • Installation of an additional exclusive eastbound right -turn lane on Lendire Road at The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a westbound right -turn lane at the site's access on Lendire Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Ogden Starbucks Development Status: Special Use Permit request under review. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Ogden Starbucks • 2,200 square foot coffee • Approved May 10, 2019 shop with drive thru • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of an additional exclusive eastbound right -turn lane on Lendire Road at Market Street (improvement installation to be coordinated with the Military Cutoff Extension project U -4751 ). Modification of the signal timing at the same intersection to incorporate the new dual right -turn lanes. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: Completed, however, the installation of right -turn lane will be constructed with the Military Cutoff extension project. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 15 Page 15 of 21 S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 21 • 32,830 square feet of retail 3. Middle Sound Market • 49,100 square feet of • TIA approved June 15, 2015 Place (Publix) supermarket • 2019 Build Out Year 4. Bayshore • 720 square feet of fast • TIA approved September 1 1, Commercial food restaurant 2019 The TIA required improvements to be made at certain intersections in the area, including Market Street at Middle Sound and the access points to the development. The major improvements consisted of: • Installation of a continuous northbound right turn lane on Market Street to Middle Sound Loop Road and site access points • Extension of existing westbound dual left turn lanes and the addition of a westbound right turn lane on Middle Sound Loop Road to Market Street • Installation of an eastbound right turn lane and westbound left turn lane on Middle Sound Loop Road to a site access Per NCDOT, the improvements required at this time have been installed in accordance with their standards. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: Completed S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 21 • 20,000 square feet of Medical /Dental Office • 70,000 square feet of 4. Bayshore Shopping Center • TIA approved September 1 1, Commercial • 8,000 square feet of High 2019 Development Turnover Sit Down • 2022 Build Out Year Restaurant • 4,000 square feet of Fast Food Restaurant The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of an additional westbound left turn lane on Bayshore Drive to Market Street • Extension of existing northbound right turn lane on Market Street from Bayshore Drive to the site's access points Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: The property is zoned B -2, which allows for this development by- right. The proposed site plan for the project is currently under review by the TRC. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 21 ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is located at the apex of three watersheds (Smith Creek, Pages Creek, and Howe Creek). Based on the applicant's preliminary stormwater design and existing infrastructure, the site will be designed to drain south to Howe Creek. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation), Class III (severe limitation) soils, and Class IV (unsuitable), however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. Specific goals of the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may be relevant for particular properties. Place Types �cr^anr �, OVnt .c ORB �/ L 2 `O�. -y �F; ➢ ��j �c� FEN�UL, 1 ASHBY m :-`� �V /n 7 o ry.a9o� GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ©,� \rs oar /� F� ¢moo s S19-02 -02 �� !«Cs4 °k pop,, 8", CONSERVATION o�RBA IXED'U+S.E '"� Z COMMUNITY MIXED USE°�� a Future Land Use Urban Mixed Use Map Place Type Urban Mixed Use promotes development of a mix of residential, office, Place Type and retail uses at higher densities. Types of uses encouraged include office, Description retail, mixed use, small recreation, commercial, institutional, single - family, and multi - family residential. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 17 Page 17 of 21 The proposed mixed use development is located off Lendire Rd., directly across from Ogden Business Park and behind commercial uses, e.g. Denny's and Patterson Auto Sales, that line Market St. It is also adjacent to single family homes within the Jacobs Ridge at West Bay subdivision. The subject parcel is designated as Urban Mixed Use on the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map, which supports a mix of moderate to high intensity commercial and office uses and moderate to high density residential uses (approximately 16+ units per acre). The plan's intent is to allow more commercial options and higher residential densities in this area to take advantage of the proximity to nearby basic goods and services and to help reduce long travel distances and associated levels of traffic. The types and intensity of commercial and office uses and the density of residential uses in the proposed project are in line with what is recommended for Urban Mixed Use areas, and the project is designed to provide a gradual transition in uses and intensity. The commercial areas Analysis are located close to the existing commercial uses along Lendire Rd. and Market St., and the residential portion of the development is located closer to the existing residential neighborhoods off of Lendire. This type of transitional development pattern helps reduce impacts on existing neighborhoods while contributing to the range of housing types available in the Ogden community. The mixed used buildings within the site also offer potential commercial alternatives to Market St. for residents of surrounding neighborhoods, which could reduce traffic congestion along Market St., and potentially Gordon Rd. once construction of Military Cutoff Extension is complete. In addition, residents of this development will be able to access the recreational uses and commercial services along Lendire without having to use primary roadways, specifically Market St. Eventually, those residents will also be able to access existing and future commercial services along Market St. without adding traffic to that road by using planned interconnections to the currently undeveloped section of the property southeast of the development that will remain zoned B -2. The proposed mixed use development is generally CONSISTENT with the types and intensity of uses intended for Urban Mixed Use areas and the Comprehensive Plan's intent of providing an orderly transition of uses and Consistency densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas. In addition, it Recommendation contributes to the range of housing types available in the Ogden community, the mixed use buildings could provide a commercial alternative to Market St. for residents of surrounding neighborhoods, and interconnections with existing commercial properties can help reduce long travel distances and their associated levels of traffic. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 18 Page 18 of 21 STAFF PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT: Staff has conducted an analysis of the proposed use and the information provided as part of the application package and has created preliminary findings of fact for each of the conclusions required to be reached to approve the special use permit request. These preliminary findings of fact and conclusions are based solely on the information provided to date, prior to any information or testimony in support or opposition to the request that may be presented at the upcoming public hearing at the Board meeting. Conclusion 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. A. The site is accessed from Lendire Road, a state maintained road (SR -2892) that connects directly into Market Street (US 17), and will connect into the Military Cutoff extension. B. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the project and approved by NCDOT. The TIA requires a right -turn lane to be installed at the site's access on Lendire Road. C. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable intersections in the area, including Lendire Road /Middle Sound Loop Road at Market Street and "Old" Lendire Road at Market Street. The TIA found that the project will slightly increase the time it takes for vehicles to get through theses intersections, but it will not reduce the overall LOS of the intersection from the level they are anticipated to operate at in 2021. D. The proposal is estimated to reduce traffic generation from what is typically possible with the existing B -2 zoning. E. The site's stormwater system will be designed to accommodate a 1 00 -year storm, exceeding the County's requirement of designing for a 25 -year storm. F. Water and sewer services will be provided by CFPUA. G. The subject property is located in the New Hanover County North Fire Service District. Conclusion 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. A. The site is zoned B -2, Highway Business District. B. Residential uses are allowed by Special Use Permit in the B -2 zoning district. C. The project proposes a mix of land uses as required to permit residential uses within a business district. D. In accordance with the standards of this special use, the commercial uses proposed within the development will be limited to those permitted in the B -1 zoning district. E. The project will contain distinguishable site design features, including consistent architectural design, color scheme, landscaping, park benches, bicycle racks, street lights and signage. F. The site plan complies with all applicable technical standards of the Zoning Ordinance including buffering and off - street parking requirements. Conclusion 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity. A. The subject property is zoned B -2, Highway Business District, and is located within Ogden /Market Street commercial node. S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 19 Page 19 of 21 B. The surrounding area contains a single - family residential development, undeveloped land, and commercially developed land. C. Bufferyards must be provided between the development and adjacent residential property. D. The applicant provided a report prepared by a real estate appraisal and consulting firm (JC Morgan - Jack C. Morgan III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS). In the report, Mr. Morgan concluded that "there was no market data that [he] found that suggested the proposed project would have any impact on the values of the adjoining or abutting properties." Conclusion 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. A. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the area proposed for the development as Urban Mixed Use. B. The Urban Mixed Use place type promotes a mix of residential, retail, and office uses at higher densities. C. The project is consistent with the recommended uses and densities of the Urban Mixed Use place type. D. The subject site is located between single - family residential areas and commercial areas, providing a gradual transition of uses as promoted in the Comprehensive Plan. E. The applicant provided a report prepared by a real estate appraisal and consulting firm (JC Morgan - Jack C. Morgan III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS). In the report, Mr. Morgan stated that "within the market area, comparable infill sites have been developed with mixed uses, generally consisting of commercial land uses located at the front of the development and residential land uses located at the rear of the development. These two land uses are often (and preferably) transitioned by multi - family or lower intense commerical uses. The proposed project maintains this trend, suggesting it is in harmony with the area it is located." PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their October 3, 2019 meeting. At the meeting six residents spoke in opposition citing concerns over drainage and flooding in the Ogden community, and other concerns. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (7- 0) with the following conditions: 1 . The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. A 6- foot -tall solid wood fence shall be installed within the bufferyard located along the northwestern property line which abuts the Jacobs Ridge neighborhood. 3. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, a 10 -foot multi -use path shall be installed along the site's frontage on Lendire Road and be extended south along the road so that it would connect to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane as part of the Military Cutoff extension project (U -4751 ). Installation of the multi -use path shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The applicant is not required to obtain S1 9 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 20 of 21 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 20 additional right -of -way in order for the multi -use path to be extended to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane. *Please see Exhibit 1 for the approximate location of the path to be installed with the development. EXAMPLE MOTIONS Example Motion for Approval: Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report, and with the four conditions recommended in the staff report. [OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions. Recommended Conditions: 1 . The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. A 6- foot -tall solid wood fence shall be installed within the bufferyard located along the northwestern property line which abuts the Jacobs Ridge neighborhood. 3. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, a 10 -foot multi -use path shall be installed along the site's frontage on Lendire Road and be extended south along the road so that it would connect to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane as part of the Military Cutoff extension project (U -4751 ). Installation of the multi -use path shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The applicant is not required to obtain additional right -of -way in order for the multi -use path to be extended to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane. *Please see Exhibit 1 for the approximate location of the path to be installed with the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, while not required in order to meet the 100 -year storm event design condition, additional culvert improvements shall be installed under Lendire Road to further enhance the existing drainage infrastructure, subject to NCDOT approval. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal: 1 . Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. (State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met] S19 -02 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 2 - 21 Page 21 of 21 S19 -02: Exhibit 1 As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, a 10 -foot multi -use path (MUP) shall be installed along the site's frontage on Lendire Road and be extended south along the road so that it would connect to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane as part of the Military Cutoff extension project (U- 4751). Installation of the multi -use path shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. The applicant is not required to obtain additional right -of -way in order for the multi- use path to be extended to the future multi -use path to be installed by NCDOT near Ogden Business Lane. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 3 - 1 Schuler, Brad From: Cumbo, Daniel R <dreumbo @ncdot.gov> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:09 PM To: Timothy Lowe Cc: Hughes, Benjamin T; Stewart, Alex D Subject: RE: Lendire Road widening Ti m, NCDOT is still in negotiations to identify and secure a contractor to perform the road widening construction on Lendire Road. Therefore, we still do not have a detailed construction schedule for this project work to share with you at this time. However, it is the intention of NCDOT to promptly engage a construction contractor in order for the Lendire Road widening construction to be completed in calendar year 2020. Sincerely, -Dan Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Deputy District Engineer Division 3 1 District 3 (910) 398 -9100 From: Cumbo, Daniel R Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 4:08 PM To: Timothy Lowe <tlowe @davenportworld.com> Cc: Hughes, Benjamin T <bthughes @ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: [External] Availability for Meeting to Discuss Lendire Road Ti m, See below the information we know at this time related to the Lendire Road widening. • The project proposes 4' asphalt pavement widening on Lendire Road (both sides - 8' Total road widening) • The project length is approximately 0.84 miles, from the Military Cutoff Right of Way to Ogden Business Lane. • The resurfacing overlay on Lendire Road would be accomplished later toward the end of the Military Cutoff Road Extension project completion. • NCDOT is currently in negotiations with the Military Cutoff project contractor to come to an agreement on the costs associated with these additional services. • A schedule for this project work has not been determined yet and will be discussed following completing the additional services cost negotiations. In addition, schedule will likely be impacted by the winter season and temperature restrictions for conducting asphalt paving construction; therefore construction would likely be in Spring 2020 at the earliest. This is currently all of the information that we have now; therefore, a meeting would not be very productive at this time. If you have any questions on any of the items above, please let me know, and I will help to clarify. Thanks, 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 4 - 1 -Dan Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Deputy District Engineer Division 3 1 District 3 (910) 398 -9100 From: Timothy Lowe <tlowe @davenportworld.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 4:29 PM To: Cumbo, Daniel R <dreumbo @ncdot.gov> Cc: Hughes, Benjamin T <bthughes @ncdot.gov> Subject: [External] Availability for Meeting to Discuss Lendire Road External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam @nc.gov Dan and Ben, Can you provide some dates and times that you would be available to discuss the Lendire Road widening with the developer for Middle Sound West (Tribute Properties)? They are trying to prepare for an upcoming meeting with the County Commissioners, and they would like to have a firm understanding of the proposed improvements that are going to be made to Lendire. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, 19 Tim Lowe, PE Project Manager DAVENPORT 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Wilmington, NC 28403 t (910) 251 -8912 ext: 22204 website I map I email Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 4 - 2 Schuler, Brad From: Hughes, Benjamin T <bthughes @ncdot.gov> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 11:31 AM To: Schuler, Brad; Cumbo, Daniel R Subject: RE: [External] RE: Lendire Road Improvement Info from NCDOT It will be like Torchwood, now go back to vacation Brad. F Benjamin T. Hughes, PE District Engineer Division 3 1 District 3 (910) 398 -9100 From: Schuler, Brad <bschuler @nhcgov.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 11:00 AM To: Hughes, Benjamin T <bthughes @ncdot.gov >; Cumbo, Daniel R <dreumbo @ncdot.gov> Subject: [External] RE: Lendire Road Improvement Info from NCDOT External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to NKmC@nc.gov Hey guys, Will the Lendire widening include striping? And if so, will it be a line at the center of the road and on the edges (like Torchwood)? 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 4 - 3 Thanks, Brad Brad Schuler I Senior Planner Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7444 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcqov.com From: Timothy Lowe <tlowe @davenportworld.com> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 10:40 PM To: Schuler, Brad <bschuler @nhcgov.com> Subject: Lendire Road Improvement Info from NCDOT Brad, As we discussed earlier today, I have attached the email chain from NCDOT containing the scope of the improvements and anticipated completion by end of 2020. Let me know if you need anything more from us on this. Thanks, Tim Tim Lowe, PE Project Manager DAVENPORT 1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Wilmington, NC 28403 t (910) 251 -8912 ext: 22204 website I map I email Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 4 - 4 ECS Southeast, LLP Engineering Report Middle Sound West Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina ECS Project Number # 22:28644 December 6, 2019 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 1 . EECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service" Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F -1078 INC Registered Geologists Firm C -406 SC Registered Engineering Firm 3252 December 6, 2019 Mr. Mark Maynard Remarkable Properties, LLC 10 South Cardinal Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 ECS Project No. 22:28644 Reference: Engineering Report Middle Sound West Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Maynard: ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) has completed the engineering analyses for the above - referenced project. ECS previously performed a subsurface exploration and geotechnical report for the project dated September 25, 2019. This report presents our understanding of the geotechnical aspects of the project along, the results of the field exploration conducted, and our design and construction. It has been our pleasure to be of service to Remarkable Properties, LLC during the design phase of this project. We would appreciate the opportunity to remain involved during the continuation of the design phase, and we would like to provide our services during construction phase operations as well to verify the assumptions of subsurface conditions made for this report. Should you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, ECS Southeast, LLP Annemarie Crumrine, E.I. Project Manager ACrumrine@ecslimited.com Winslow Gains, PE Principal Engineer WGoinsicDecslimited. com K- 12/06/19 CD 6714 Netherlands Drive, WilmingtongM,;�c�§ # @�n{mT48pegbAa� 41,'262($10 -686 -9666 • www.ecslimited.com ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -AITEE K 12C5 -12CS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP Middle Sound West December 6, 2019 ECS Project No. 22:28644 Page 1 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is located on Lendire Road in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. Figure 2.1.1 below shows an image of where the site is located. Z 1! Figure 2.1.1 Site Location 1.2 CURRENT ROADWAY CONDITIONS The site currently consists of a portion of the existing Lendire Road roadway. From historical images found on Google Earth, the original Lendire Road roadway appears to have been built between 1998 and 2002 and between October 2016 and March 2018 the southern part of the roadway near the site was realigned and resurfaced as part of Middle Sound Loop Extension. Based on the approximate elevations taken from New Hanover County GIS, the site elevations on Lendire Road range from around 42 to 4S feet. 1.3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Based on the information provided by Krupanidhi Koilada of Davenport, ECS understands that the traffic load from the proposed development will consist of 779 daily trips on the newly constructed Middle Sound Loop Extension and 92 daily trips on the existing Lendire Road northwest of the development. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 3 Middle Sound West ECS Project No. 22:28644 2.0 ANALYSIS December 6, 2019 Page 2 The addition traffic from the proposed development for Lendire Road over a 20 year period will be 270 Equivalent Single Axel Loads (ESALs). The typical NCDOT recommended pavement section of 1.5 inches of surface mix overlying 6 inches of ABC stone is designed to support 12,500 ESALs. The traffic load for Lendire Road was not provided to ECS, but based on the typical traffic loads for residential neighborhoods, the additional traffic from the development will not degrade the existing pavement section beyond its designed life span. Depending on when the original roadway was constructed, Lendire Road appears to near or beyond the typical design life for a pavement section. It is important to note that heavy truck traffic significantly increases the ESALs on a pavement section. ECS understands that for this project that construction traffic will be routed on Middle Sound Road Extension to Market Street and will not use Lendire Road to exit the proposed development. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 4 Middle Sound West December 6, 2019 ECS Project No. 22:28644 Page 3 3.0 CLOSING ECS has prepared this report of findings, evaluations, and recommendations to guide geotechnical- related design and construction aspects of the project. The description of the proposed project is based on information provided to ECS by Davenport. If any of this information is inaccurate, either due to our interpretation of the documents provided or site or design changes that may occur later, ECS should be contacted immediately so that we can review the report in light of the changes and provide additional or alternate recommendations as may be required to reflect the proposed construction. We recommend that ECS review the project's plans and specifications pertaining to our work so that we may ascertain consistency of those plans /specifications with the intent of the geotechnical report. Field observations, monitoring, and quality assurance testing during earthwork and foundation installation are an extension of and integral to the geotechnical design recommendation. We recommend that the owner retain these quality assurance services and that ECS be allowed to continue our involvement throughout these critical phases of construction to provide general consultation as issues arise. ECS is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations of others based on the data in this report. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 5 - 7 Case: Site Address: S19 -02 7200 block Market St/ 200 block Lendire Rd cr ;o do ' cr FT Existing Zoning /Use: B -2 /Undeveloped /0 `GENERAL% ! RESIDI:NIT S19 -02 1,000 fFC��ni sioners - June , 2020 M:12 -7 -1 Proposed Use: a Mixed Use 00 �.(Q O4+ Qv Oe� i o Lqffi C7 ti WA Bq yam_ DE R �a ,o 0 'i A0— —IN "vN VVHEEV WAY Place Types OP COMMERCE ZONE z EMPLOYMENT CENTER W C� - �V' GENERAL RESIDENTIAL © lu URBAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 6. 6 RURAL RESIDENTIAL NN Era D CONSERVATION Case: �71 F.JIM+N �jk I I I Site Address: 7200 block Market St/ 200 block Lendire Rd O � `Q Cif , �Q - I f 1- \. Existing Zoning /Use: B -2 /Undeveloped a� 332 / q/ .� 331 321 • 27 tit Q(!!� }jj 323 FQR 220 :01 z25` • ■ 212 ■ 221216 • 208. 204 217 • _ ■ • i 209 201 '•pN, / 213 • ■205 • X222 G�: 5`L i /m0 216 z03 .218 ■ s0 -vz = '223 1% ■ 7424 217.215 214, 7 21 422 / ■ \/ 7418 7420 7429 7416 7427 74_ /77412 7425 =•743 7421�� f•'� X7408i'1\7410 4 /7423 7426 \/ 7415 20 ■ 7424 7413 ;/,x-17422 74110 / 7418 7407 ■!7409 7416 7405 It\ • 7414 741a ■ \ • 7412 740037408i` \ 7402.7406 311 \ 7404 ■� ` 7314 y�/!�73�\ 7241 '2177217 X217 rz 17 •7213 5 y 7209 ■ 7%<.., 211 7247 // o�� 7200 O. 7135 1,000 • BOOF fFC,e i sioners - June , 2020 M:12 -8 -1 o ` •/ % • 2 ■ 7245 7225 ■ ■ \ 7231 7235 7221 7225 ■ 7219 •7223 7211 • :�x 1 '71rm ■11, - r -\ \ Proposed Use: Mixed Use 7415 ■ 7409 ■ 0 7409 7375 7411 ■ CUD B-Z I CUDrO &1 I R -10 CZD S19-02 0. Sri I 0. / 4� 0 &1 464 B -2 R -15 WAYNERI j 1 DG_E ('" ��� 0 1 CITY 0 G- - / 'f1►. UYyEEL,- WAY. Z W f o W �o CZD R -15 R -20 �SHaRE Po,Nr DR `om� "n s ih 6 APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 9 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (9 T 0) 798 -7053 plan n i ngdevelopment. n hcgov.co m SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application Applicant/Agent Information Property Owner(s) If different than ApplicantlAgenf Name Owner Name Mark Maynard, Jr. Coswald, LLC Company Owner Name 2 Tribute Companies Address Address 10 S. Cardinal Dr. 1030 E. Wendover Ave. City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Wilmington, NC 28403 Greensboro, NC 27405 Phone Phone (910 251 -5030 Email Email jr @tributecompanies.com Subject Property Information Address /Location A portion of 7241 Market St., Wilmington, NC, Parcel Identification Number(s) A portion of R04400- 001 - 003 -000 Total Parcels) Acreage Total parcel acreage is ± 30.84 acres, Special Use Permit requested for ±15.00 acres. Existing Zoning and Use(s) B -2 zoning district, undeveloped land. Future Land Use Classification Urban Mixed Use Application Tracking Information Case Number Date /Time received: Received by: 519 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 3 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 1 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 7/2017 Proposed Use(s) & Written Description Please list the proposed use or uses of the subject property, and provide the purpose of the Special Use Permit and a description of the project (please provide additional pages if needed). The Applicant is proposing a mixed -use development consisting of 288 multi - family units and t 9,100 sq ft. of commercial space in the B -2 District pursuant to New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance Sec. 72 -38. For further description of the proposed project and Special Use Permit request please see attached Exhibit A. Traffic Impact Worksheet Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: Please see TIA prepared by Davenport dated June 24, 2019 Trip Generation Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): AM Peak Hour T PM Peak Hour Trips: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 4 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 2 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 72017 For each of the four required conclusions listed below, include or attach a statement that explains how any existing conditions, proposed development features, or other relevant facts would allow the Board of County Commissioners to reach the required conclusion, and attach any additional documents or materials that provide supporting factual evidence. The considerations listed under each required conclusion are simply those suggested to help the applicant understand what may be considered in determining whether a required conclusion can be met. You should address any additional considerations potentially raised by the proposed use or development. 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and approved._ Considerations: • Traffic conditions in the vicinity, including the effect of additional traffic on streets and street intersections, and sight lines at street intersections with curb cuts • Provision of services and utilities, including sewer, water, electrical, garbage collections, fire protection • Soil erosion and sedimentation Protection of public, community, or private water supplies, including possible adverse effects on surface waters or groundwater Anticipated air discharges, including possible adverse effects on air quality Please see attached Exhibit A. 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. Please see attached Exhibit A. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 5 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 3 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 7/2017 ji if OR .+ a :- r�7 7 ! i .: a a , fil. W sigg � 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. Considerations: • The relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development, including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of operation, etc) • Whether the proposed development is so necessary to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community or County as a whole as to justify it regardless of its impact on the value of adjoining property Please see attached Exhibit A. 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Considerations: • The relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development, including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of operation, etc) • Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives for the various planning areas, its definitions of the various land use classifications and activity centers, and its locational standards Please see attached Exhibit A. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 6 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 4 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 72017 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial ". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N/A ". Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Applications must be complete in order to process for further review- Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 7 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 5 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 7/2017 Applicant Staff Required Inforrrvation Initial or Initial or N/A J N/A 1 Complete Special Use Permit application. �.. 2 Application fee — ($500; $250 if application pertains to a residential use (i.e. 5 mobile home, duplex, family child care home). i 3 Traffic Impact Analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). 85 4 Site Plan including the following elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. • Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non - residential structures, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. • Development schedule including proposed phasing. • Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. • The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. • Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. • The approximate location of US Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act Section 404 and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Wetlands, and wetlands under jurisdiction of the NC Department of Environmental Quality. • Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by Federal or State law or Local Ordinance. • Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change (Ref. Article VII, as applicable). 5 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan. 6 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 7 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 5 Special Use Permit Application — Updated 7/2017 ACKN0IM�EDGEMEN7 AND.:SIGNAT -URES By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Special Use Permit for which I am applying. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. understand that I have the burden of proving that the proposal meets the four required conclusions. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Authority for Appointment of Agent Form If applicable, I also appoint the opplicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit on application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. Coswald, Lt_C tl By Signature of Property'Owner(s) Print Name(s) Tribute Companies By: Mark Maynard, Jr. Signature of Applicant /Agent Print Name NOTE: Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. *The land owner or their attorney must be present For the application at the public hearings. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be colendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance.lf the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Staff Only ,-For Application Received ComRequired gY (date):, atioii " tern as dO1 " forinett Planning Board M' a ng! . Page B of 6 Board of Commissioners - June Use Permit Application — Updated 7/2017 ITEM: 12- 10 - 6 By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Special Use Permit for which I am applying. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving that the proposal meets the four required conclusions. I certify that this application Is complete and that all information presented In this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, Information, and belief. Authority for Appointment of Agent Form If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or Indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. Signature of Property Owner(s) Signature of Applicant /Agent Coswald, LLC By: Print Name(s) Tribute Companies By: Mark Maynard, Jr. Print Nance NOTFt Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. *The land owner or their attomgy must be present for the agplication at the public hearings. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be colendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance if the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. For Stoff Only p�i cttti' �,..,:�!�: •� • �..... aw, =�aa� ......x -,.fir: _' ±.."`,a;!: r Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 8 of 8 ITEM: 12- 10 - 7 Special Use Permit Application— Updated 7/2017 Exhibit A to Special Use Permit Application Portion of 7241 Market St. New Hanover County PARID: R04400- 001 -003 -000 (Special Use Permit request for x-15.00 acres of a ±30.82 acre tract) The Applicant, Tribute Companies, is requesting a Special Use Permit for residential uses within a commercial district pursuant to NHC Zoning Ordinance § 72 -38 as part of a proposed mixed -use development consisting of 288 multi - family units and ±9,100 sq. feet of commercial space on a portion ( ±15.00 acres) of a ±30.82 acre parcel located at 7241 Market Street (NHC Tax Parcel ID No. R04400- 001 - 003,000), as illustrated above. The entire parcel is currently zoned B -2 Highway Business District. Residential uses are allowed within the B -2 District by Special Use Permit, subject to prescribed conditions listed in Section 72 -38. The portion of the parcel not included in this Special Use Permit request ( ±15.82 acres) will allow opportunities for future B -2 commercial development intended to complement both the commercial and residential components of the proposed development. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 8 1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and approved. The proposed use will not endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and approved. The subject property is already zoned general B -2 Highway Business District, without conditions. The general B -2 zoning on this property allows for larger and more intensive commercial uses by -right than currently proposed under the Special Use Permit proposal. The proposed development pursuant to Section 72 -38 will ensure a more compatible transition from the more intense commercial uses typically found along Market Street in this vicinity to the existing single - family residential neighborhood adjacent to the subject property. Allowing this property to be developed pursuant to the Special Use Permit with conditions, moreover, will provide a better opportunity and framework to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses than would likely result under a general B -2 District development. This Special Use Permit proposal also ensures that the development will be a high - quality mixed -use development providing for an integration of diverse but compatible uses into a single development, unified by distinguishable design features, with amenities and walkways to increase pedestrian activity. It is also significant to note that under Section 72 -38, all commercial uses under the Special Use Permit are restricted to residential and B -1 commercial uses. In this regard, the Special Use Permit request is effectively similar to downzoning a portion of the property from B -2 (General District without conditions) to B -1 (with conditions pursuant to the Special Use Permit process) as it is related to proposed commercial uses under the Special Use Permit. By way of illustration, some of the uses currently allowed by- right in the B -2 District which are not allowed in the B -1 District include: mini - warehouses; RV and boat trailer storage lots; dry-stack storage of boats as a standalone warehouse; warehousing; wholesaling with no outside storage; auto dealers and truck sales; boat dealers; building materials and garden supplies; automobile/boat repairs sales; equipment rental and leasing; and septic tank vacuum service. Additionally, the B -2 District allows more than 30 manufacturing uses by Special Use Permit which are simply not allowed in the B -1 District. In addition to the foregoing, adequate utilities and infrastructure including water and sewer are available for the site, as it is located along the Market Street corridor close to the City of Wilmington limits. A traffic impact analysis has been conducted, and pursuant to the TIA review and Special Use Permit approval process, all required traffic improvements will be made. The project will be engineered and constructed in accordance with New Hanover County and North Carolina stormwater regulations. 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 9 The proposed use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance. As stated above, the current zoning of the subject property is B -2 Highway Business District. Under Section 72 -38 of the Zoning Ordinance, residential uses are allowed within the B -2 district by Special Use Permit as part of a mixed -use development meeting certain criteria designed to ensure a high quality project with an integration of diverse but compatible uses into a single development, unified by distinguishable design features. As illustrated in the concept plan below, the project is comprehensively planned from the standpoint of site design, setbacks, buffering, landscaping, stormwater management, parking and traffic distribution elements consistent with the zoning ordinance. In addition to review by County Staff, the New Hanover County Planning Board and ultimately the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners, the project will also be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee to ensure compliance. - ;a 1W %warm 1W '%% r -ur Middle Sound West will incorporate high quality architecture and site design to create a cohesive project in which residential and commercial uses complement each other in an efficient, walkable community. The project includes moderate density multi- family residential along with four mixed -use buildings that will include office /retail space as well as residential units. Sidewalks are provided throughout and parking is shared, creating a more efficient use of space. Community facilities and common area are provided, including a village green and pocket park shown on the site plan, and community amenities for the residents and their guests, including a clubhouse and pool. In addition to the included mixed -use elements, further horizontal mixed -use is achieved via the nearby commercial businesses within close walking distance of the site, including restaurants, a business park, and recreation and entertainment facilities. Also, the remaining portions of the larger subject parcel, which are already zoned B -2, will provide 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 10 for future commercial uses along the Market Street corridor to complement the proposed residential and commercial development. 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. The proposed development will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. The existing parcel is currently zoned B -2. The proposed Special Use Permit will limit the portion of the parcel closest to the adjacent residential neighborhood to residential and a less- intense range of possible B -1 uses. The residential component of this proposal will ensure that the commercial uses provided for in the Special Use Permit development will be neighborhood -scale retail and office and compatible with both the existing nearby residential uses and the proposed residential uses within the development. The Special Use Permit request allows a transition between the existing neighborhood to the west and more intensive commercial uses along and in closer proximity to the Market Street Corridor. Without the Special Use Permit, the entire parcel is open to general B -2 development without conditions. Allowing residential uses in the B -2 by way of this Special Use Permit request will help ensure compatibility with the surrounding area. Additionally, a vegetative buffer will be provided between Middle Sound West and the existing neighborhood, any traffic improvements required by the traffic impact analysis will be made, and the project will incorporate a stormwater engineering plan where none exists now. The buildings will be constructed with high - quality, aesthetically pleasing facades and fenestrations, and the site design will incorporate greenspaces and sidewalks to ensure that Middle Sound West is a visually pleasing development and an enhancement to the area. The commercial components will provide adjacent residents with additional options for goods and services within walking or bicycle riding distance. All other adjacent parcels to the northeast, southeast and southwest are currently zoned 13-2, and would also not be negatively impacted by the Special Use Permit request. The additional residences will also provide additional customers for commercial businesses existing or to be developed on B -2 properties, enhancing horizontal mixed - use that would benefit the surrounding area as a whole. 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The proposed project is in harmony with the area in which it is to be located. The zoning map below shows that the larger subject parcel is zoned B -2 and bordered by B- 2 on both the northeast and southwest property boundaries and Market Street on the 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 11 southeast. To the northwest, there is a residential community zoned R -10. The proposed mixed -use development provides a buffer of multi - family residential and smaller, neighborhood -scale B -1 uses in closer proximity to the existing neighborhood, which also ensures that more intensive uses will not be built within the Special Use Permit area directly adjacent to the R -10 developed property. Residents of the proposed multi - family residences will be able not only to walk or ride a bike to the commercial uses in the proposed development, but will be within walking distance of existing restaurants, offices, and recreational and entertainment uses. u u 7 YY� 4'r I1�4 0 This location lends itself to such a horizontal mixed -use development pattern, which is a benefit to New Hanover County. According to the Comprehensive Plan, New Hanover County is expected to continue its population boom for the next two decades with as many as 337,054 residents by the year 2040. More housing will be needed to accommodate that growth. Multi - story, multi - family residential is a more efficient way to meet this housing demand given the limited area of New Hanover County and relatively few remaining larger vacant tracts with access to sufficient infrastructure allowing opportunities for increased residential density and mixed -use development. The Comprehensive Plan encourages and recommends a more mixed -use approach to land use than the predominate development pattern taking place over the past few decades. The subject property is designated as Urban Mixed Use placetype in the Comprehensive Plan as illustrated below. The Urban Mixed Use placetype advocates moderate to high density multi - family residential uses as well as both vertical and 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 12 horizontal mixed -uses to include office and retail uses. This project incorporates all of those elements recommended by the Comprehensive Plan: Urban Mined Use Placetype wW paa®1 �.rwMtiM.CPR+A M1.lal4�Y'1.'/.. Nwr..w +r.rrparww�wa IMrt{wFlNe ■ IMIO.IYM(INR. tBPW aRYNIW a .........rte �...,... `...._«..�... : �.� �.=... mow,{....... BIw I�UHi a.a. .v... u. .e.r N:..e u.. .N wo a r..r.r La VF,otf1.IN11NT {NL +1. ,tee L . 6 DEFINITION This placetype provides access to a mix of residential, office, and retail uses at higher densities. Multi- family residential uses arc preferred, though higher- density single family developments will riot be prohibited. Mixed uses are encouraged in the same footprint in ❑ vertical pattern, but they can also be adjacent, or separated by lower traffic local and collector roads in a horizontal pattern. This placetype Use Number of Stories Ideal Density Office 3 -7 Moderate/ High Retail 1 -3 Low /Moderate planned 2 -7 Moderate/ Development High Residential 2 -5 Moderate/ High Commerdal/ 2 -7 Moderate/ Mixed Use HGoh Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 13 Additionally, the proposed project is consistent with many of the Goals, Implementation Strategies and Implementation Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan such as promoting both fiscally and environmentally responsible growth. Goal III: Promote fiscaliv res onsible growth. Implementation Strategies Implementation Guidelines C. Encourage infill development on vacant or blighted III.C.1 Encourage a mixture of uses that pieces of existing communities by providing create opportunities for shared parking incentives such as grants, but not limited to; density and setback requirements to serve the bonuses, and /or a reduction of parking requirements overall community. and /or setbacks. existing communities through encouraging infill and D. Encourage the redevelopment of single uses into III.D.1 Encourage incremental mixed -use developments where appropriate. transformation of single uses into with the surrounding neighborhoods. compatible mixed use centers that are IX.D.2 Encourage infill development to compatible with the surrounding maximize use of previously developed sites nei hborhoods. E. Encourage redevelopment of aging corridors to III.E.1 Encourage revitalization and support and strengthen adjacent neighborhoods. redevelopment of blighted infill sites into compatible mixed uses that enhance nearby residential areas through incentives such as density bonuses, shared parking, and /or innovative buffering. F. Encourage development where existing III.F.1 Encourage increased density in infrastructure is available. Urban Mixed Use areas within close proximity of City of Wilmington jurisdic- tion and Growth Nodes as identified on the Future Land Use Map (Porter's Neck/Kirkland, Monkey Junction, and 1- 40/1 -140 Interchange) in an effort to create densities that can support future infrastructure. Goal IX: Promote environmen Illy responsible growth. Implementation Strategies Implementation Guidelines A. Promote a mixture of uses where appropriate in IX.A.1 Encourage mixed use development an effort to cluster development and minimize that rewards development practices which impacts on natural resources. exceed minimum standards. D. Strengthen and direct development toward X.D.1 Encourage incremental inclusion of existing communities through encouraging infill and mixed uses into areas that are single use redevelopment. dominated where the uses are compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. IX.D.2 Encourage infill development to maximize use of previously developed sites for highest and best use. 7 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 14 In sum, the proposed project will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and consistent with virtually all of the numerous policies and goals of the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan promoting and encouraging mixed -use development. M. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 15 NEW HANOVER COUNTY 1 =t PLANNING & LAND USE AUTHORITY FOR %j APPOINTMENT OF AGENT 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910 -798 -7165 phone 910 -798 -7053 fax w%%,w.nhcgov.com Please note that for quasi-judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected «with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property Name Owner Name Address Matthew A. Nichols Coswald, LLC 7241 Market St. Company Owner Name 2 City, State, Zip Law Office of Matthew A. Nichols Wilmington, NC Address Address Parcel ID 3205 Randall Pkwy, Suite 104 1030 E. Wendover Ave. R04400- 001 -003 -000 City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Wilmington, NC 28403 Greensboro NC 27405 Phone Phone (910) 508 -7476 Email Email matt @mattnicholslaw.com Ica" Number Reference: Date/Time received: Received by: This document was willfully executed on the Coswald, LLC: day of U t,z 20 A - J-4 , A.I. 0 &A A:4-� Owner Signat re V Owner 2 Signature By: *5. L"� SKrj�rtly!�- Printed Name T4tle Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 04114 ITEM: 12- 10 - 16 NEW HANOVER COUNTY ,.r PLANNING & LAND USE A UTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910- 798 -7165 phone 910 -798 -7053 fax www.nhcgov.com Please note that for quasi - judicial[ proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned applicant does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and /or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: I. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Applicant(s) Subject Property Name Owner name Address Matthew A. Nichols Tribute Companies 7241 Market St. Company Owner Name 2 City, State, zip Law ©fiice of Matthew A. Nichols Wilmington, NC Address Address Parcel ID 3200 Randall Pkwy, Suite 104 10 S. Cardinal Dr. 804400- 001 - 003 -000 City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Wilmington, NC 28403 NC 28403 Phone -Wilmington, Phone (910) 508 -7476 (910) 251 -5030 Email Email matt@mattnicholslaw.com Application Tracking Information 1r @tributecompanies.com (St9fl, OnIN.) Case Number Reference: Date/Time received: Received by: I'his document was willfully executed on the day of �(n � _y . 20 Tribute Companies: Applicant 1 Signature By: Mark Maynard, Jr. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 17 09114 PARAMOUNTE I--- N C3 1 N Lz� F-= R I " C__, I N C. July 2, 2019 MIDDLE SOUND WEST 7241 MARKET STREET COSWALD LLC Deed Book 4883, Page 903 All that tract or parcel of land located in Harnett Township, New Hanover County, State of North Carolina, being a portion of the lands conveyed to Coswald LLC as recorded in Deed Book 4883 at Page 903; said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron rod located at the southwesterly corner of the herein described parcel; said iron rod located on the northeastern right of way of Lendire Road being a 60' right of way. Thence along the northwestern line of said parcel and the southeastern side of Jacobs Ridge West Bay HOA, Inc recorded in deed book 3576 page 824, N 45 °45'11" E a distance of 156.96' to an existing iron pipe; Thence N 37 °23'17" E a distance of 1079.69' to an existing iron pipe; Thence turning and running with the lands of Camelot Campground, Inc as recorded in deed book 1863 page 212, Thence S 60 °33'55" E a distance of 555.53; Thence with a new boundary line running through said Coswell LLC parcel the following eight (8) calls: Thence S 37 °23'17" W a distance of 895.06; Thence S 49 °23'06" E a distance of 75.16'; Thence S 45 °42'15" W a distance of 38.00'; Thence S 47 °58'39" W a distance of 29.38'; Thence N 53 °00'18" W a distance of 290.32; Thence S 36 °46'05" W a distance of 226.05'; Thence S 53 °03'22" E a distance of 245.34; Thence S 45 °32'58" W a distance of 202.55'; Thence along the right of way of Lendire Road N 44 °30'42" W a distance of 571.58'; to the point of beginning, Having an area of 681,189 + /- square feet, 15.638 + / -acres more or less. 5 9 1 1 ❑ L E A N D E R D R I V E , S T E . 2 ❑ 1 , W I L M I N G T O N , N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 0 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 18 PARAMOUNTE Ez N G 1 N L E Prt I N G. I N C MEMORANDUM Date: August 22, 2019 To: To whom it may concern From: Tim Clinkscales, PE, PLS RE: Stormwater for Project We understand the concern of the community in regard to stormwater detention, in that vein, we are designing the stormwater facilities to handle up to and including the 100 -year event. This event exceeds the county requirement of the 25 -year event, in addition, all stormwater on the site will be conveyed into our stormwater facilities, therefore any stormwater that flows into the northern ditch/ market street today will be now conveyed to our stormwater facility. For water quality, our basin is 60% larger than the required by NCDEQ, in addition will be providing pretreatment measures to enhance the water quality in our treatment system. In conclusion, we believe that the stormwater system will be enhanced by this project since the stormwater flow for all storms will be less than its current condition. 1 2 2 0 1 N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T ❑ N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 (_3 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 19 0 DAVENPORT August 22, 2019 RE: Summary of Trip Generation Comparison Middlesound West, New Hanover County, NC DAVENPORT Project Number 190231 This memorandum is in response to a request from the owner to provide a comparison of Trip Generation of the "By Right (B -2) Use" versus the "Proposed Use" for the proposed Middlesound West development project located in New Hanover County, NC. DAVENPORT prepared a conservative comparison of Trip Generation of the `By Right (B -2) Use" versus the "Proposed Use ". Under the existing B -2 zoning, there are many potential commercial land uses that could be developed by right on this 15 acre property or it could be developed as a Big Box Retail Store(s) or Retail Center. As a conservative approach, we assumed a mix of retail, office and restaurant uses totaling approximately 116,000 SF. With this mixture of uses, internal capture reductions were included as well to be conservative in the trip generation comparison. In general, the results indicate that this potential conservative "By -Right Use" would generate approximately 3 times more traffic, and this could even be higher depending on the actual size and land uses developed on the property. Summary Table of Trip Generation Comparison Use AM Peak Traffic Volumes PM Peak Traffic Volumes Daily Traffic Volumes Proposed 71% less traffic 65% less traffic — 2/3 less traffic By Right 3.5 times more traffic 2.8 times more traffic — 3 times more traffic "Proposed Use" Trip Generation Table :A Middlesound West Average Weekday Drive%vay Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak PM Peak Two -Way Hour Hour Land Use ITE Land size Method 'Volume Enter Exit Enter Exo Ada iame Multifarn ly Hcou5ing (Low- 2220 24.0 Dwelling Adjacent" 141 3 9 10 6 Rises Units Equation Mumfemily Housing (Mid- 221 264.0 Dwelling Adjacent? 1,437 23 66 69 Rise) Units Equation Small Office X12 32.0 Employees Generator) � ��� 5 1a 29 32 Building Equation Total Unadjusted Trips 1.833 51 89 11108 92 Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wil in ton, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board s §low¢ F40t3b.�' 77 ITEM: 12- 10 - 20 Page 2 0 DAVENPORT Potential "By -Right Use" Trip Generation Table 8/22/2019 DAVENPORT Project No. 190231 I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina and hereby certify that the results outlined herein were determined using methods prescribed by the standards of Traffic Engineering. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 910 - 251 -8912. Sincerely, Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Senior Associate cc: File 190231 Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board WePP9" §i0W¢ - 40t3t. 9377 ITEM: 12- 10 - 21 10MUM-5—un-dWest Average Weekday LrivewayVolumes 24 Pour AM Peak Hour PNI Peak Hour Tw* -W Land Use lid Land S � Da Volume Enter Exit Eater Exit Code Small Office Buildin 712 45,0 Employees Generattor± Equation 359 33 is 40 48 Shopping Center I= 52.0 40.0 10+04 GFA Adjacent Equation 3,224 107 132 143 Shopping Center 320 50.0 9000 �GFA Adjacent/ E cation 3,752 110 67 156 160 Shopping enter pry €1.20 8.4 t(y00 GLA Adjacent" Equation 1.118 54 33 42 45 High-Turnover (Sit Do.-,n i Restaurant "MmiGTM 932 &I 7 -0 • R M. 4T* a 10700 GFA 4 `Cen'eratvr,, Rate 7$5 e 60 1 42 B3 58 office 1 temal Capture J .1 etai I I nternal a tore -11 -23 -23 -25 Restaurant Internal Oapture -1 1 -1 1 -26 LUC h urnover estaurant `35A .6 0 1 -1 -1 U in enter i :0 0 0 tC, CrO I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina and hereby certify that the results outlined herein were determined using methods prescribed by the standards of Traffic Engineering. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 910 - 251 -8912. Sincerely, Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Senior Associate cc: File 190231 Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board WePP9" §i0W¢ - 40t3t. 9377 ITEM: 12- 10 - 21 SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT Middle Sound West Mixed -Use Development 7241 Market Street Distinguishable Design Features Narrative As provided for in New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance Section 72- 38(1), the proposed Middle Sound West mixed -use project will be unified by a number of distinguishable design features, including the following: • High - quality, consistent architectural design will be employed throughout all of the buildings to create visually appealing facades with interesting fenestration in a cohesive design. • A complementary color scheme will be used throughout the development, and the buildings will be positioned in a walkable street grid design creating a "block" pattern. These blocks are designed such that the buildings are oriented toward the parking area, providing grass courtyard type areas of open space behind the residential buildings with connecting sidewalks to encourage pedestrian movement and outdoor activities. • The common theme and cohesive vehicular and pedestrian connections throughout the project will include consistent high - quality design features, including landscaping, park benches, bicycle racks, street lights and signage. • Sidewalks provided throughout the development along all block -faces and interior courtyard areas will help energize the project and encourage residents to walk within the development and to existing and future commercial uses in the vicinity. A central roundabout provides a design focal point as well as a traffic calming measure. • Energy- efficient LED streetlights, consistent in design, will be placed throughout the development at regular intervals to improve nighttime visibility. • Middle Sound West will feature several amenities for residents, including a community pool, clubhouse and community building. A large village green community space will promote outdoor activities. A large zero curb plaza will connect the pool and amenities building to the village green. All amenities are connected to the sidewalk system for the overall project. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 22 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING Special Use Permit for a portion of 7241 Market St. New Hanover County Planning File No. S 19 -02 The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting for the above - referenced special use permit request was mailed via First Class Mail to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property as listed on the County tax records on August 7, 2019, and also submitted to the County Planning Department on August 7, 2019 for e-mail distribution via the "Sunshine List ". A list of all adjacent property owners to whom written notice was mailed is attached hereto as Exhibit "A ". A copy of the written notice is also attached as Exhibit `B ". Copies of all envelopes that were returned undeliverable are attached as Exhibit "C" The meeting was held at the following time and place: Monday, August 19, 2019, from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Covenant Church, 210 Station Rd., Wilmington, North Carolina. The persons in attendance were: For a list of persons in attendance, please see copy of sign -in sheets from the Community meeting attached hereto as Exhibit "D ". On behalf of the Applicant the following people were in attendance: Mark Maynard, Jr., Molly McDonough and Maria Pietroforte, Tribute Companies; Josh Mihaly, RLA, Mihaly Land Design; Dan Cumbo, P.E., Davenport; Tim Clinkscales, P.E., Paramounte Engineering; Matt Nichols and Nikki Cooper (paralegal), Law Office of Matthew A. Nichols. The following issues were discussed at the Community Meeting: • Proposed mixed -use development and uses; • Current zoning and possible by -right uses of site; • Types of land uses allowed in the B -2 zoning; • Site design and building elevations; • Timing of Special Use Permit process and public hearings; • Fencing; • Stormwater impacts and management; • Traffic impacts and concerns; • Number and location of proposed driveways; • Proposed roadway improvements with the project; • Timeframe for NCDOT project improvements on Market Street and Military Cutoff Extension; • Amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed project (AM peak, PM peak and Daily Trips) and comparison of trip generation for by -right use versus proposed use; • Future intersection connection of Lendire Road and Military Cutoff Extension; • Lendire Road recently added to the NCDOT state road system. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 23 As a result of the meeting the following changes were made to proposed project: • Addition of a 6-foot wooden fence along the northwestern boundary of the project. • Addition of multi -use path. • Designing the stormwater facilities to handle up to and including the 100 -year event. Respectfully submitted, By: Vd C? 19 Matthew A. Nichols, attorney and agent for the Applicant Law Office of Matthew A. Nichols 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 24 OWNER ABRAMS DANIELLE ADAIR ZACHARY WILSON ADAMS JASM I N E AIKMAN TEDDY B DENISE L ANDERSON JAMES CARL ANDRESEN BONNIE J ASH JUSTIN 10HANNE BAKER AMANDA D BEALL MEGAN ELISE BECK RONALD W ELIZABETH P BENNING SUZETTE J BERRIER DANA MEREDITH BISSINGER PAUL F BOCALISI REALTY TRUST BROWN ELIZABETH BROWN JESSE R JOANNA J BROWN MICHELLE LEE BROWN SIMON A BRUNKSWICK PROPERTY SOLUTIONS LLC BRYANT DEBORAH ETAL C&J PROPERTIES OF HAMPSTEAD LLC CAMELOT HOLDINGS INC CAMERON COMPANY TIMBER LLC ETAL CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTHORITY CARMO GEORGE CHOW TONY CHUNG KING TONG COGDELL CAROLYN R COLE ROBERT W IV JILLIAN F COMER BREIANNE M CORBETT TRAVIS COSWALD LLC MAILING LIS' MAILING ADDRESS 212 PALM GROVE DR 7420 ERN WAY 7423 ERN WAY 201 PALM GROVE DR 7402 ERN WAY 16082 TORREYS WAY T FOR COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BROOMFIELD, CO 80023 213 WAGON WHEEL WAY 206 BRIDGETON CT 225 PALM GROVE DR 7427 ERN WAY 7413 ERN WAY 351 LAFAYETTE STREET 1566 CIVIETOWN RD 89 ACCESS RD SUITE 1 7302 VESPAR CT 201 MARTINIQUE WAY 225 BRIDGETON CT 7403 ERN WAY 408 WHITE COLUMNS WAY 204 PALM GROVE DR 109 MIDDLE POINT RD 1900 EASTWOOD RD #10 PO BOX 3649 235 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR 7513 PETERS LN 327 LIDO DR 7420 MILAN CT PO BOX 620 331 LIDO DR 7315 MORLEY CT 217 BRIDGETON CT 1030 WENDOVER AVE E WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SUPPLY, NC 28462 NORWOOD, MA 2062 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SUPPLY, NC 28462 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 GREENSBORO, NC 27405 CROIGER YVES MARIE CLAIRE 810 WINE CELLAR CIR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CURTIS DONALD P 7340 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 25 PID R03600- 001 - 317 -000 R03617- 001 - 034 -000 R03617- 001 - 050 -000 R03600- 001 -320 -000 R03617 -001- 025 -000 R03617 -001- 058 -000 R03617 -001- 028 -000 R03617 -001- 092 -000 R03600 -001- 327 -000 R03617 -001- 048 -000 R03617- 001 - 054 -000 R03617- 001 -045 -000 R03617- 001 - 038 -000 R04400- 003 - 002 -000 R03617- 002 - 006 -000 R03600- 001 - 368 -000 R03617- 001 - 072 -000 R03617 -001- 059 -000 R03617 -001- 088 -000 R03600- 001 -319 -000 R04400- 002 - 035 -000 R03600- 001 - 001 -000 R03600- 006 -004 -000 R03600- 001 - 321 -000 R03617 -001- 039 -000 R03600- 001 - 305 -000 R03617- 001 - 068 -000 R03617- 002 - 010 -000 R03600 -001- 306 -000 R03617 -002- 063 -000 R03617 -001- 046 -000 R04400- 002 - 039 -000 R04400- 001 - 003 -000 R03600 -001- 315 -000 R04400- 003 - 124 -000 EIIIIIIIII tabbkr M X 2 DAP PROPERTIES LLC DAVIS REBECCA ANN DESAIX AMY C DESGRANGES MARGARET L DICELLO LOUIS M CYNTHIA L DURHAM JEFFREY D KRISTINA M REVOCABLE TR ELLINGTON LISA EVENTIDE PROPERTIES LLC FERREIRA PROPERTIES LLC FLYNN SHANEN SAGE FOREHAND PROPERTIES LLC GALE THOMAS C ALLISON L GANS STUART JESSAREIN GLOVER RICHARD H ELIZABETH T GOMEZ JASON D AMY K GOUCK PROPERTIES LLC GRANT SHELBY HOLLIDAY HARLEY CATHERINE E HARPER BENJAMIN F DELIA ETAL HARRIS JAE LEE HARTZ CHAD L SARAH E HOGAN JOHN D DONNA A HOLLAND BRADLEY PAUL HUDDLESTON ZACKARY JESSICA R HUENE JAMES L CLARA K HUYNH HUNG VAN DO THI NGUYEN IVENTOSCH MILES AMANDA LAWRENCE JACKSON WILLIAM J REGINA JACOBS RIDGE WEST BAY EST HOA JACOBS RIDGE WEST BAY HOA INC JOHNSON MARTHA K KAISER FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC KARAMAN JENNIFER NOEL KAYE LOUANNE LATSHAW THOMAS A KATHERINE F 1535 ROYAL OAK DR 7312 MORLEY CT S 7424 ERN WAY 7419 ERN WAY 12208 RENWICK PL 7952 SANDERLING PL 217 PALM GROVE DR PO BOX 2024 2217 LOBLOLLY CT 207 BRIDGETON CT PO BOX 10793 8715 NEW FOREST DR 16 CHANNEL DR 408 WHITE COLUMNS WAY LELAND, NC 28451 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 GLEN ALLEN, VA 23059 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28402 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7309 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8721 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7418 MILAN CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7432 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7408 MILAN CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7307 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 221 PALM GROVE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 478 BISCAYNE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 321 LIDO DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 211 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8141 SALTCEDAR DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7304 MORLEY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 209 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7303 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 1630 MILITARY CUTOFF RD #104 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 1630 MILITARY CUTOFF RD #108 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 220 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7213 OGDEN BUSINESS LN SUITE 213 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7407 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7415 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 7310 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 26 R03617 -001- 047 -000 R03617 -002- 028 -000 R03617 -001- 036 -000 R03617 -001- 052 -000 R03617 -002- 029 -000 R03600 -001- 316 -000 R03600 -001- 325 -000 R04400- 003 - 002 -003 R04400- 002 - 031 -000 R03617- 001 - 042 -000 R04406- 001 - 003 -001 R03617- 001 - 055 -000 R03617- 002 - 009 -000 R03617- 002 - 003 -000 R03617 -002- 020 -000 R03617- 002 - 024 -000 R03617- 001 - 035 -000 R03617- 001 - 067 -000 R03617- 001 - 040 -000 R03617- 001 - 063 -000 R03617- 002 - 023 -000 R03600- 001 - 326 -000 R03617- 001 - 093 -000 R03600 -001- 367 -000 R03617- 001 -044 -000 R04400- 003 - 048 -000 R03617- 002 - 032 -000 R03617- 001 - 043 -000 R03617- 002 - 021 -000 R03617- 002 - 146 -000 R03617- 001 - 094 -000 R03617- 001 - 085 -000 R04400 -001- 005 -000 R03617 -001- 057 -000 R03617 -001- 053 -000 R03617- 002 -002 -000 LEWIS CALVIN G MARTIN JASON D MCCLARNON JORDAN P LAUREN B MCDONNELL BETH MATTHEW E MCFARLIN JENNIFER H MARK G MCLAUGHLIN RACHEL A ETAL MERCER ROBIN DOUGLAS MUELLER JOHN JOANNE P MURPHY NANCY K MYERS GAVIN NC DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW HANOVER COUNTY NGUYEN QUANG NOGLIO ENZO OAKWOOD PROPERTIES LLC OCEANS 3 LLC ODONNELL KELLY A OGDEN CARWASH LLC OGDEN COFFEE LLC OGDEN SPORTS CENTER LLC PALM GROVE OWNERS ASSOC INC PARRISH CAROLYN B PATTERSON JAY CHARLOTTE PENN EL PATRICK A PORTER DEBORAH A RAMOS MARLON ESQUIBEL ROBITAILLE DONNA RAE TRUSTEE RUSKIN RYAN MICHAEL RYALS DELORIS RYAN JAMES R CAROL JOAN SAENZ OSWALDO N SCHEER JAMES ETAL SHAH MOHAMMAD BELQEES S ETAL SHANNON JOSEPH EDWARD 7416 MILAN CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 066 -000 223 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 071 -000 7426 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 037 -000 3371 BLACKBEARD RD GREENBACKVILLE, VA 23356 R03600 -001- 323 -000 8729 SEDGLEY DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 R03617 -001- 027 -000 208 PALM GROVE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03600 -001- 318 -000 53 FOREST ST MIDDLETON, MA 1949 R03600 -001- 370 -000 2 GREEN CT MANORVILLE, NY 11949 R03617 -002- 027 -000 210 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 090 -000 7312 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 001 -000 1505 MAIL SERVICE CTR RALEIGH, NC 27699 R04400 -001- 787 -000 R04400- 001 - 786 -000 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 R04400- 002 - 037 -000 SUITE 190 7305 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 022 -000 7302 MORLEY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 033 -000 5121 TROJAN DR CHARLOTTE, NC 28278 R04400- 003 - 002 -002 8636 VINTAGE CLUB DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R04400- 002 - 030 -000 425 BEN OAKS DR W SEVERNA PARKS, MD 21146 R03617- 001 - 033 -000 1900 EASTWOOD RD #10 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 R03600- 001 - 378 -000 1900 EASTWOOD RD 10 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 R04400- 002 - 038 -000 1900 EASTWOOD RD SUITE 10 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 R04400- 001 - 004 -000 430 EASTWOOD RD SUITE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 R03600- 001 - 339 -000 PO BOX 54 HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443 R04406- 001 - 001 -000 R04406- 001 - 003 -000 7235 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R04400- 002 - 033 -000 1341 BERKELEY ST APT 1 SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 R03617- 002 - 019 -000 7404 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 026 -000 7226 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 008 -000 218 BRIDGETON CT UNIT 30 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 086 -000 7414 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 031 -000 906 BAYSHORE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 R04400 -002- 030 -001 325 TOULON DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 R04406- 001 -002 -001 7313 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -002- 026 -000 222 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 084 -000 4116 MIDDLE RIDGE DR FAIRFAX, VA 22033 R03617 -001- 032 -000 802 SPRING VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 R04400- 002 - 031 -001 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 27 SHANNON ROBERT GLENN ETAL SHEPARD CARL E MARTHA S SHERRICK INVESTMENTS LLC SHOLAR HOLDINGS LLC SHUMPERT SCOTT D SINGLETARY DAWN MICHELLE ETAL SLEIGHER FRANCIS J JR SNYDER JENNIFER K ETAL SPIREK BRANDI ROSE STALVEY PROPERTY LLC STEARNS PROPERTIES LLC STILWELL EMILY E STOKLEY DENNIS G SHARON J STOUT JOHN C CYNTHIA S STRICKLAND DANIEL E KELLI CAVE SUGGS JEFFREY E TALLON ALLISON L BRENDAN L TAYLOR CHARLES W III AMANDA L TAYLOR RAMONA A TRI -CITY BUTTE LLC UHRICH ADRIANE C VAN KIRK JOSEPH C BARBARA L VANDERGAAG JUSTIN VASKE MARCUS TODD JENNIFER LYNN WAGNER LEROY R KATHRYN L WALKER LAURIE ETAL WALLACE MARY L WCW PROPERTIES LLC WILLIAMS CHELSEA M WILLIAMS STEPHEN T WORTHLEY ASA G ETAL WP MARKET STORAGE LLC WRIGHT GINA M 3 CASPER RD BSL SOUTHPORT, NC 28461 R04400 -002- 034 -000 R04400 -002- 032 -000 PO BOX 353 SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460 R04400 -003- 002 -004 4774 RIVER FARM RD ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27803 R03617 -001- 065 -000 133 INLET DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R04400 -003- 117 -000 R04400- 003 -002 -007 7424 MILAN CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 070 -000 7425 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 049 -000 205 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -001- 041 -000 208 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 091 -000 7421 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 051 -000 313 CAVALIER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 R04400- 003 - 001 -000 51 COCHETOPA TRL POWDERHORN, CO 81243 R03617- 001 - 064 -000 224 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 083 -000 708 TREE SWALLOW LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R04406- 001 - 001 -001 7306 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 004 -000 7311 VESPAR CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 025 -000 216 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 087 -000 7306 MORLEY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 002 - 031 -000 205 PALM GROVE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 R03600 -001- 322 -000 7308 MORLEY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -002- 030 -000 1227 ROCKINGHAM RD ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379 R04400- 002 - 029 -000 129 GREEN ST APT 7 WARRENTON, VA 20186 R03617- 001 - 030 -000 2526 COUNTRY CLUB RD JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546 R03617- 002 - 005 -000 38 LENAPE TRL WAYNE, NJ 7470 R03617 -001- 029 -000 213 PALM GROVE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03600- 001 - 324 -000 212 BRIDGETON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 089 -000 319 LIDO DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03600- 001 - 369 -000 846 BELL FORK RD JACKSONVILLE, NC 28540 R04400- 002 - 036 -000 5809 MEADOW BROOK CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 R03617- 001 - 069 -000 7409 ERN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617- 001 - 056 -000 433 ROSLYN RD WINSTON SALEM, NC 27104 R03600 -001- 007 -000 106 N CHANNEL DR WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 R03617 -002- 007 -000 4064 COLONY RD SUITE 430 CHARLOTTE, NC 28211 R04400 -002- 043 -000 R04400 -002- 028 -000 7311 MORLEY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 R03617 -002- 061 -000 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 28 EXHIBIT LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW A. NICHOLS 3205 Randall Parkway, Suite 104 Ph: (910) 508 -7476 Wilmington, NC 28403 Email: matt@mattnicholslaw.com August 7, 2019 NOTICE OF COMMUNITY MEETING TO: Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents FROM: Matthew A. Nichols RE: Community Meeting Regarding Special Use Permit Request New Hanover County Planning File No. S19 -02 Meeting Date and Time: Monday, August 19, 2019, from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Meeting Location: Covenant Church, 210 Station Road, Wilmington, NC 28405 Dear Neighbors: This is a notice for a community information meeting regarding a Special Use Permit request submitted to New Hanover County by my client, Tribute Companies (the applicant), to allow residential uses within a commercial district pursuant to Section 72 -38 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is located at 7241 Market Street and is currently zoned B -2 Highway Business District. My client is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow for the development of a proposed mixed -use project including 288 multi - family units and approximately 7,466 square feet of commercial space on a portion of the subject property. The subject parcel located at 7241 Market Street (New Hanover County Tax Parcel ID No. R04400- 001 -003 -000) consists of approximately 30.82 acres and is generally shown as that property outlined in blue on the attached Exhibit 1. The Special Use Permit (SUP) request applies to approximately 15 acres of the subject parcel, generally shown as the Proposed SUP Area outlined in yellow on the attached Exhibit 1. A copy of the proposed site plan is attached as Exhibit 2. The purpose of the community information meeting is to explain the proposed development and answer questions from meeting attendees. This meeting is also open to the general public. The community meeting will be held at Covenant Church located at 210 Station Road, Wilmington, NC from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on Monday, August 19, 2019. For directions or for further information, or if you are unable to attend the community information meeting and have any questions, comments or concerns about this matter, please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Nikki Cooper at the contact information listed above, and I will be glad to speak or meet with you individually at your convenience. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 29 EXHIBIT 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 30 co Z l%pT'elp4 I s_ X _ey,[GY .� 6m! i area.taiwreoyNa�s�src 1j"` d F� t _ — nor Yneom — ^ — — — — � — — — — _ dLL3'JVY NIO _ — i �•og _ ' I — — y I / �_ , 4 1 t _ r — f m y ° ° 3[i Ali f- a'e •`• $' r a Lei 94 al E 11c � Fi % 4 T�11 1TiI I i o °� sp 3 ILRLK N - .•8E0 41 . L — - — - — - — - --- - — - - /- au3rmm NSNartt�urn I Pm mm�w� Y � 4 `t -I be b im b�i� mwRmwwwnm. _ y 'I± 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 31 :�nwawwrrnR�Rr x •a���tl.��RRR +mtp� A�ldS -0�11R [acavuuzrmz: .c o..a.��' /Yt4.�1 �..m,m �� MR. IRIWS6tL: q vsn G1CM1�}. USNRlN7rPb% fcm�tl]rmos 119+E� �eil.o.+.� +P e+lotfamt'eW a.me: rin: ll4lr yarwa.v +row.n w�.-a a,.Nm yyppW��NY e+.�e... a..u.e.mnwowtw L �dPVw�cer�an i9eV�GfAYMSe 41 lmQi�ay.15-f n:U Ry M+.+rvaalrkN S �✓TJua.a+nR R.r 1P'.+lrRw Mr+/4R� 2 W rJ].e4hmwd W�tt9fe },,mA 1MOrrnntrvJ �� vi LELLSC]6AnaY E 0...+ncct TOtvi'1R11C 3bw'T QiGftyq f 3iTr,9ARNOR ms`4�,�T[Ttcn'- fclmnniJnr �,�w�y.�.1�1 � 41 .M Oc+. s.Y¢� yu n- �.,uv.wwa macwm 9Lnlit �vemeanc ua,�+.+ � .I..ne..�w�row,osN. w.•dwwP.swire`. ryL .�j neryOL9C'HUfOY �.^^— �3RrrwvuPr.+M.+mm`LY�4M rP �MV��reMl ; Rx 2'�'as 'J �Xtvuw 1Wn4[iMtlJ®nM mow— rner mn.wmwau ,m.re�r.n�.., e.+.ab,e.aR.w.w.�aix a *tnu^.:,p cxa o I � ,p4wWi, 10I�V wnu�c a+°nm`� dam ati>'vro A RMYM 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 31 .ton, NC 28403 ' ='k-VeY, au,u: sU4 NC 29403 4 -"'.r, an, NC 28403 .41 .r1+r4i. ll It 3 3.r -V EXHIBIT a s STEARNS PROPERTIES LLC 51 COCHETOPA TRL POWDERHOO'L' 1 j -w Tl `. 3 �` goes i 2.5 i 9 `= F..N T �rND7- P, r:�Ur - iCIENT ADDRESS {.. _ �. ii i. y r'1 La ti L { Li x" L i 4 tit A � 47 it 65a��t X11' f' Elllffl!! sfsil�jyl fy�[frtiiiy'ssrf�r�fgr�ss,ry,ss ..�.�, RYAN MICHAEL RUSKIN 7414 ERN \A/AV VVILMINGT{ FORWARD TIME a EXP RTN TO SEND,'O fly RUSKIN'RYAN M 1772 LARCH AVE N= APT 303 ISSAQUAH WA 96029 -7 342 RETURN TO SENDER t Ifflllillf,frrlllrrfi I f:l:lli,lil,,,f II I1„ 6,:I IIf6Frr1 r 6,,, , e r ere, rr rr r ... .. ... .. ., .. .. 'r�r•ts BETH MCDONNELL MATTHEW E MCDONNELL 3371 BLACKBEA °n - GREENBACKVI NIXIE 231 DE 2 RETURN TO SE?tiDc:rs NO MAIL RECEPT, C; E UNABLE TO FORWARD Board of Com'missioner's = "Junf' f j 2 5 55 2 9 ftEM:12 -10 -3 IIP e of Matthew A- Nil Call Parkway, Suite 104 :>n, NC 28403 �-t- CX7 'USA ADRIANE C UHRICH 129 GREEN ST APT 7 WARRE 282 N7E I 21917208 ' 108,'19 TINIE EXP R N -0 5- E D J 7'1^ 2 ErtN AY of Matthew A. Nichols .,ail Parkway, Suite 104 NC 28403 2 L USA SHERRICK INVESTMENTS LLC 4774 RIVER FARM RD ROCKY Mni-INT- NJC 9790�1-- — N 1 X1 E 276 FE 1 0008/1.6/19 RETURN TO SENDER T V =_- AZ! Ak D V, 0 %IABLE 10 FORWARD z8: &,L�b&bbo i 11111il 1111311 1 Jill Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 33 EXTHIBIT .Y COMMUNITY MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR 7241 MARKET ST. (S19 -02) (NEW HANOVER TAX PARCEL ID NO. R04400- 001 - 003 -000) AUGUST 19, 2019 COVENANT CHURCH, 210 STATION RD., WILMINGTON, NC NAME ADDRESS Fc-9k/7A7rot/ LQwZjqA Vt L/jf/ & ?I �? k , "'\ 5 � &;k)k '� a-1-1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 34 NAME �Itf FfiHy Community Meeting Sign -In Sheet Proposed Special Use Permit for 7241 Market St. Monday, August 19, 2019 Covenant Church, 210 Station Rd. ADDRESS L�Ao`�r -Ct 2g4-II /Q r L i' b 6 Pge t ,,.e, a7 &V j� be- FA H Y /0 �v, LEO ���Ciy�/ aUq V (P -tm Garm rna ✓T ms(�)-- K(*� C—( 2b"7 Loci sL,&� 6ii Lf Y6 �- r &a'a 11 t�� ':Z� 7B F,/ /-'2 7-OW 0 7-- e5O Q �/ Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 35 NAME Community Meeting Sign -In Sheet Proposed Special Use Permit for 7241 Market St. Monday, August 19, 2019 Covenant Church, 210 Station Rd. ADDRESS 7233 r`b-j�f tSf ttllllx U-C 29VZl a�C'Q 1 cam- 6, - am �u , q(A J-4 Y'ZZ CC\ iP.c��. i20_ShVY_I�uG Cl. zs�i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 36 Community Meeting Sign -In Sheet Proposed Special Use Permit for 7241 Market St. Monday, August 19, 2019 Covenant Church, 210 Station Rd. NAME ADDRESS 9 - r s 5 Cvt d 7141 q L c& c Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 37 _ NIP 5/8 REBAR O � q a 0 rJ1 --'� Board of Commissioners - June 1. 2020 EXISTING SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: TOTAL TRACT AREA: SUP AREA: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND CLASSIFICATION: OWNER INFORMATION: 7241 MARKET ST. R04400- 001 - 003 -000 ± 30.84 AC ± 15.6 AC B -2 URBAN & GENERAL RES. COSWALD, LLC. 1030 E. WENDOVER AVE. GREENSBORO, NC 27405 SITE INVENTORY NOTES 1. Soils Types: Se (Seagate fine sand), Le (Leon sand), Mu (Murville fine sand), & DO (Dorovan) 2. This property is not impacted by any AEC. 3. This site is not impacted by any recognized historic or archeological significance. 4. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site. 5. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands within the proposed Special Use Permit area. 6. There is no evidence of endangered species or habitat issues on the site. 7. No portion of this property is within a Special Flood Hazard Area as evidenced on N.C. Flood Map 3720315900J, dated April 3, 2006. O U cry O U O w W cry W W 1 O r� V V J nW F1 -I I� W Z O w o! z O a O 1 Z Z W J U Wo w �J Z O � �DN Z Q U o U 0 W o O W U z �W i--� W O H N w0 22U OVi F Z o O r � n C D a Q» Z z F- >° ° Z o LL J J d U < 0 Z_ o F-Q�❑ --)W�O< 0 > ZZY ZWQw HQ(nQW Z d UU d E x O�❑❑ U SEAL BE-1 PEI JOB #: 19244.PE JC MORGAN PEAL ESTATE VALUATION 1 REVIEW ( C[ NsuLrING October 3, 2019 New Hanover County Planning Commission 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Special Use Permit Application Middle Sound West Mixed Use Development - 7241 Market Street Tribute Companies 10 S. Cardinal Drive Wilmington, NC 28403 JC Morgan Company is a real estate appraisal and consulting firm in Wilmington, NC. Since 2010, our firm has appraised and consulted on hundreds of properties in and around the Wilmington area. The property types we appraise and provide consulting services for include vacant land, residential, multi- family, retail, office, industrial, subdivisions and mixed -use. Our client base consists of real estate owners, developers, financial institutions, local and federal governments and related agencies, attorneys, utility companies and airport authorities. I was recently engaged by the applicant to perform research and analysis that would enable me to conclude an opinion to Criteria Numbers 3 and 4 (on page 6 of 8) of the applicants Special Use Permit application. As my expertise is in real estate valuation, I have limited my scope to this area. The first of the two required criteria I researched was: Criteria Number 3 The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. To develop an opinion for this criteria, I took several steps. Each is summarized as follows: 1. I performed a review of several apartment communities and comparable mixed use projects in the Wilmington market to determine the impact, if any, these properties had on adjacent property values. During my research, I found no indication that the properties abutting the adjacent apartment communities or comparable mixed use properties had a negative impact on value. Lumina Station 1904 Eastwood Road • Suite 30S • Wilmington, NC • 28403 PO ]Box 481 • WrightsviHe Beach, NC • 28480 Tel: 910- 2S6 -2920 • Fax: 888- 819 -8258 www.jemorganco.com Board of Commissioners - Q1aieMr=(2019 ITEM: 18- 90 139 Discussions with market participants is a common method to get a feel of how the market perceives various issues. For this assignment, I spoke with several market participants (residential real estate appraisers and brokers) about the impact the proposed development could have on the adjoining or abutting properties. All of the individuals indicated that the proposed project would have no impact on the real estate values of adjoining or abutting properties. Two indicated that backing up to several uses permitted in the B -2 district could have a negative impact on value. In summary, there was no market data that I found that suggested the proposed project would have any impact on the values of the adjoining or abutting properties. The next criteria associated with the Special Use Permit Application is as follows: Criteria Number 4 That the location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Due to the growth of the immediate area over the past several years, the property is considered an infill site. Within the market area, comparable infill sites have been developed with mixed uses, generally consisting of commercial land uses located at the front of the development and residential land uses located at the rear of the development. These two land uses are often (and preferably) transitioned by multi - family or lower intense commercial uses. The proposed project maintains this trend, suggesting it is in harmony with the area it is located. Furthermore, the property is identified as an Urban Mixed Use place type in the NHC Comprehensive Plan. In my opinion, the proposed development easily conforms to the County's definition of this place type. The proposed development is consistent with the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan as it provides the desired property mix, as noted in the Comprehensive Plan, and an orderly transition of property types from the higher intensity uses located along Market Street to the single family residential uses to the west of the property. Should you have any questions, or want to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jack C. (Cal) Morgan, III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS IC Morgan Company Board of Commissioners - maieMr=(R019 ITEM: 18- 90 240 ■ IIII'l I nj Board of Commissioners- June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 10 - 42 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 11 - 1 i EXISTING SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: TOTAL TRACT AREA: SUP AREA: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND CLASSIFICATION: OWNER INFORMATION: DEVELOPMENT DATA PROVIDED UNITS PROVIDED DENSITY 288 UNITS 115.6 AC COMMERCIAL SF COMBINED OFFICE / RETAIL BUILDING HEIGHT (12) 3 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 2 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 1 -STORY BUILDING OPEN SPACE AMENITY AREA VILLAGE GREEN GENERAL AREA 7241 MARKET ST. R04400- 001 - 003 -000 ± 30.84 AC ± 15.6 AC B -2 URBAN & GENERAL RES. COSWALD, LLC. 1030 E. WENDOVER AVE. GREENSBORO, NC 27405 288 UNITS 18.4 UNITS /AC 7,466 SF TOTAL 35' MAX. 35' 25' 20' ± 3.62 AC (157,740 SF) TOTAL + 0.63 AC (27,400 SF) ± 0.34 AC (14,810 SF) ± 2.65 AC (115, 530 SF) II �' I CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER MAIN ON LENDIRE RD. DUMPSTER WITH ENCLOSURE SITE INVENTORY NOTES LEGEND 1. Soils Types: Se (Seagate fine sand), Le (Leon sand), Mu (Murville fine sand), & DO (Dorovan) PROPOSED SIDEWALK 2. This property is not impacted by any AEC. 4 —w vv— PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN 3. This site is not impacted by any recognized historic or archeological significance. ss PROPOSED 8" SEWER MAIN 4. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site. PROPOSED STORM PIPE 5. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands within the proposed Special PROPOSED HYDRANT Use Permit area. �N 6. There is no evidence of endangered species or habitat issues on the site. PROPOSED BLOW -OFF VALVE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 517 7. No portion of this property is within a Special Flood Hazard Area as ® PROPOSED MANHOLE evidenced on N.C. Flood Map 3720315900J, dated April 3, 2006. 132 Apt. units @ 1.5 /unit = 198 PROPOSED STREET LIGHT 132 Apt. units @ 2 /unit = 264 DEVELOPMENT NOTES 24 Studio Apts @ 1.5 /unit = 36 1. All development shall be in accordance with the New Hanover County 7,466 sf office /retail @ 1/400 sf = 19 Zoning Ordinance. 2. Project shall comply with all Federal, State & New Hanover County regulations. PROVIDED PARKING SPACES 553 3. No public R.O.W proposed. All roads/ drives to be private and maintained Compact Spaces Provided 76 by H.O.A. HC Spaces Provided 12 4. H.O.A. to maintain all open space, buffer areas, stormwater management 500 -1,000 spaces = 2% elements and parking facilities. of provided spaces (11 required) TRAFFIC AND PARKING PLAN IMPERVIOUS AREA + 382,006 SF TOTAL 1. All traffic will enter and exit through either road connection located on Lendire Rd/ Middlesound Rd. extension or the stub connection to Lendire BUILDING SF + 107,782 SF Rd, as shown. Connection to either street is subject to NCDOT approval. SIDEWALK + 48,467 SF 2. All parking to be handled through a HOA owned/ maintained parking facility EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE PARKING / DRIVEWAY + 225,757 SF to meet the parking standards set forth in the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. SEWER EXTENSION TO TIE TO 3. A TIA report has been submitted for review. EXISTING SEWER MAIN XyoG U 25' SEWER EASEMENT PARCEL ID R03617A 001 094 -000 R03617- 001 - 094 -000 N F N /F X JACOBS RIDGE WEST JACOBS RIDGE WEST " �1— — — X BAY HOA, INC. BAY HOA, INC. �x � — D.B. 3576 -824 COMPACT SPACES, TYP. D.B. 3576 -824 42 `40 X25 15.6.E ,:.�� :E N 34 °18'31 E 1079.69' (]Nn ,vi�3dOdd JO ]0IS HOd3 ,OZ) I W WZL 8 d W8:1d 1NEW3S12 3QVNf'VM0- ,C 20 SIDE BUFFER - �. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. i34.37'SIDEBUFFER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Ww .�. . . .W. .W.�.�.�.W.�.�.�.�.W.�.W.�.�.�. . �.�. .W.W.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.W.�.W.�.W. . .W.�.�.�.W.�.W.W. .�.�.W.W.�.�.W.W.W.�. .W. . . . . . . . .�. .�.�.W.�.�.�.W. .W.�.W.W.�.W.W. . ... . . .W.�.�.�.W.�.W.W.�. .�.W.W. .�.W.W. °j - -w� _ 48.12' SIDE BUFFER . _ MH"��ri T77 15 9 10 10 10 PHO 8 - 9' 8� I u>' - 68.75' SIDE BLDG SETBACK a a I \ JgL -19. L 919'1 -'L — N — — — 9d 9, — �� — q 91911 L — I m 96.25' SIDE BLDG SETBACK I I� 16 8 10 9 1 fld-H N I �Cn ; /i /i ; r I I I w a. 2 w� I ® 8 18' � I � I i ��I Ifs II °1 6 4 4 A APARTMENT BLDG 1 8 8 8 EXISTING SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: TOTAL TRACT AREA: SUP AREA: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND CLASSIFICATION: OWNER INFORMATION: DEVELOPMENT DATA PROVIDED UNITS PROVIDED DENSITY 288 UNITS 115.6 AC COMMERCIAL SF COMBINED OFFICE / RETAIL BUILDING HEIGHT (12) 3 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 2 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 1 -STORY BUILDING OPEN SPACE AMENITY AREA VILLAGE GREEN GENERAL AREA 7241 MARKET ST. R04400- 001 - 003 -000 ± 30.84 AC ± 15.6 AC B -2 URBAN & GENERAL RES. COSWALD, LLC. 1030 E. WENDOVER AVE. GREENSBORO, NC 27405 288 UNITS 18.4 UNITS /AC 7,466 SF TOTAL 35' MAX. 35' 25' 20' ± 3.62 AC (157,740 SF) TOTAL + 0.63 AC (27,400 SF) ± 0.34 AC (14,810 SF) ± 2.65 AC (115, 530 SF) II �' I CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER MAIN ON LENDIRE RD. DUMPSTER WITH ENCLOSURE SITE INVENTORY NOTES LEGEND 1. Soils Types: Se (Seagate fine sand), Le (Leon sand), Mu (Murville fine sand), & DO (Dorovan) PROPOSED SIDEWALK 2. This property is not impacted by any AEC. 4 —w vv— PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN 3. This site is not impacted by any recognized historic or archeological significance. ss PROPOSED 8" SEWER MAIN 4. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site. PROPOSED STORM PIPE 5. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands within the proposed Special PROPOSED HYDRANT Use Permit area. �N 6. There is no evidence of endangered species or habitat issues on the site. PROPOSED BLOW -OFF VALVE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 517 7. No portion of this property is within a Special Flood Hazard Area as ® PROPOSED MANHOLE evidenced on N.C. Flood Map 3720315900J, dated April 3, 2006. 132 Apt. units @ 1.5 /unit = 198 PROPOSED STREET LIGHT 132 Apt. units @ 2 /unit = 264 DEVELOPMENT NOTES 24 Studio Apts @ 1.5 /unit = 36 1. All development shall be in accordance with the New Hanover County 7,466 sf office /retail @ 1/400 sf = 19 Zoning Ordinance. 2. Project shall comply with all Federal, State & New Hanover County regulations. PROVIDED PARKING SPACES 553 3. No public R.O.W proposed. All roads/ drives to be private and maintained Compact Spaces Provided 76 by H.O.A. HC Spaces Provided 12 4. H.O.A. to maintain all open space, buffer areas, stormwater management 500 -1,000 spaces = 2% elements and parking facilities. of provided spaces (11 required) TRAFFIC AND PARKING PLAN IMPERVIOUS AREA + 382,006 SF TOTAL 1. All traffic will enter and exit through either road connection located on Lendire Rd/ Middlesound Rd. extension or the stub connection to Lendire BUILDING SF + 107,782 SF Rd, as shown. Connection to either street is subject to NCDOT approval. SIDEWALK + 48,467 SF 2. All parking to be handled through a HOA owned/ maintained parking facility EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE PARKING / DRIVEWAY + 225,757 SF to meet the parking standards set forth in the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. SEWER EXTENSION TO TIE TO 3. A TIA report has been submitted for review. EXISTING SEWER MAIN XyoG U 25' SEWER EASEMENT PARCEL ID R03617A 001 094 -000 R03617- 001 - 094 -000 N F N /F X JACOBS RIDGE WEST JACOBS RIDGE WEST " �1— — — X BAY HOA, INC. BAY HOA, INC. �x � — D.B. 3576 -824 COMPACT SPACES, TYP. D.B. 3576 -824 42 `40 X25 15.6.E ,:.�� :E N 34 °18'31 E 1079.69' (]Nn ,vi�3dOdd JO ]0IS HOd3 ,OZ) I W WZL 8 d W8:1d 1NEW3S12 3QVNf'VM0- ,C 20 SIDE BUFFER - �. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. i34.37'SIDEBUFFER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . Ww .�. . . .W. .W.�.�.�.W.�.�.�.�.W.�.W.�.�.�. . �.�. .W.W.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.W.�.W.�.W. . .W.�.�.�.W.�.W.W. .�.�.W.W.�.�.W.W.W.�. .W. . . . . . . . .�. .�.�.W.�.�.�.W. .W.�.W.W.�.W.W. . ... . . .W.�.�.�.W.�.W.W.�. .�.W.W. .�.W.W. °j - -w� _ 48.12' SIDE BUFFER . _ MH"��ri T77 15 9 10 10 10 PHO 8 - 9' 8� I u>' - 68.75' SIDE BLDG SETBACK a a I \ JgL -19. L 919'1 -'L — N — — — 9d 9, — �� — q 91911 L — I m 96.25' SIDE BLDG SETBACK I I� 16 8 10 9 1 fld-H N I �Cn ; ; w a. 2 I ® 8 18' APPROXIMATE w m N m m I 6 4 4 A APARTMENT BLDG 1 8 8 8 I; 6 LOCATION OF $. M MIXED -USE 1 10 8' 3 3 STORY I L BLDG 1 ( (24) UNITS IWATER MAIN I 3 3 STORY N N 0 0 5,326 SF COMMERCIAL J I ` ( m }W n n 4 I ~ 4 Z ~0 24'� 7 7 < I 7 <MV APPROXIMATE 1 VILLAGE GREEN Q 7 7 �° + I LOCATION OF EXISTING "— — HYDRANT I g I h w I �o, 4 3 V j I 23' -- _J1 °' I — — r' I a - 5' W I DE Q I — ZERO CURB PLAZA— — ►v � I W I� W n COL I STORMWATER NI MANAGEMENT AREA = == III I II / 4C Co Co low I I � I W W I w °W I � W I .. I y I I r`W / I �// IWWWWw I� � II I —�_ _ II Ili I — 'E_ _ II — FM.sc_ Ili I Ii 3S! L 3, _J L SIDEWALK, TYP. 10 t POOL 7 Of 1 Z D UJ U) 11 AMENITY BLDG. • ' M C,4 1 STORY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT; 15' 15' 5,800 SF L 24' J NOT INCLUDED IN S.U.P. / �\ // Q $ $ PROPOSAL — — — X 9 18' 1 / APARTMENT BLDG 3 3 STORY (24) UNITS CO � o ° m J U) } (n Haz I I Z 0 Z W J gm� M V M N H � � Q Q � a Q L — J APARTMENT BLDG 9 3 STORY (24) UNITS N 8 8 N PARCEL ID# LO m 24, R03617- 001 - 001 -000 0 0 16 ' L N CAMELOT in � � in � `� CAMPGROUND, INC. 4 Z o Z Z o Z 1a' �� 4 D.B. 1863 -212 U) (n � M N M N � tY L24'-J l cNn � a a 7 F 1 10 18' 9 Q _ 1 4 1 � 3 4 n I � 1 s 10 — 24' I N $ L •J I J co L , a' 18 I 0 18' 1- }� m }� U I I ZO�� ZOZ 17 N W 4 17 rn L24'J HMS Cl) I W 0 Q Q W I Q a 8 I rr► hr--I I I N w 15 ® 8 10 ® STREETLIGHT, TYP. 41. � � � I � ' 9 r 9 l <-_31 �7�79' 1 ACCESS TO FUTUR N DEVELOPMENT 4 b J 9' L I�8 1 J 9' L I N STORAGE SHED S.U.P. BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE, TYP. TRASH COMPACTOR AND RECYCLING — — ' CENTER WITH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE o _ S x MS — f S 42 >3 Ms � 29 12 12 REMAINING PARCEL AREA; 10' NOT INCLUDED IN S.U.P. I PROPOSAL II VV 43.50 p � ' N — —v _ 20 C I U x PARCEL ID I PARCEL ID# I —�� _ MS -- Q N # 1 R04400- 002 - 032 -000 1 F�— 04400 - 002 - 031 -0011 N/F x I �S 42` W N/F JOSEPH E. SHANNON I PARCEL ID# I 37 29» -_ JOSEPH E. SHANNON 1 D.B. 856 -600 I R04400- 002 - 034 -00� I PARCEL ID I 00 — D B 1130 -20 1 I N/F x I R04400- 002 -035 1 I MARY J. SHANNON N/F G I� X X X I D.B. 1240 -1612 I I CHARLIE M. WALLACE, 25 1 x'I 1 x I D.B. 3240 -220 1 ��o Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 I I PARCEL ID# I R04400- 002 - 036 -000 N/F MARY L. WALLACE jrxn D.B. 1397 -656 PROPOSED HYDRANT, TYP. W know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE W 0 25 50 100 200 Pj I SCALE: 1 " =50' PL LA Z O rn w z 0 Q 0 L_ Z H Z w J U Wo w Z 00 N � �D D 0C Z Q U o U o W Viz° U W N s~ O N o Z U � `p Zz Z O A w � In H �Q 0 WW��U N 11 F LD O 0� a CO o Q > > Z LL Z F- 00 o Z_ J J d U <� (DLL Z_ D Q � 0 O 0 W� 0� > Z Z Y d ZW< Qz nQW C)X 0(00L) aE SEAL SUP-1 PEI JOB #: 19244.PE N 8 8 N PARCEL ID# LO m 24, R03617- 001 - 001 -000 0 0 16 ' L N CAMELOT in � � in � `� CAMPGROUND, INC. 4 Z o Z Z o Z 1a' �� 4 D.B. 1863 -212 U) (n � M N M N � tY L24'-J l cNn � a a 7 F 1 10 18' 9 Q _ 1 4 1 � 3 4 n I � 1 s 10 — 24' I N $ L •J I J co L , a' 18 I 0 18' 1- }� m }� U I I ZO�� ZOZ 17 N W 4 17 rn L24'J HMS Cl) I W 0 Q Q W I Q a 8 I rr► hr--I I I N w 15 ® 8 10 ® STREETLIGHT, TYP. 41. � � � I � ' 9 r 9 l <-_31 �7�79' 1 ACCESS TO FUTUR N DEVELOPMENT 4 b J 9' L I�8 1 J 9' L I N STORAGE SHED S.U.P. BOUNDARY OPEN SPACE, TYP. TRASH COMPACTOR AND RECYCLING — — ' CENTER WITH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE o _ S x MS — f S 42 >3 Ms � 29 12 12 REMAINING PARCEL AREA; 10' NOT INCLUDED IN S.U.P. I PROPOSAL II VV 43.50 p � ' N — —v _ 20 C I U x PARCEL ID I PARCEL ID# I —�� _ MS -- Q N # 1 R04400- 002 - 032 -000 1 F�— 04400 - 002 - 031 -0011 N/F x I �S 42` W N/F JOSEPH E. SHANNON I PARCEL ID# I 37 29» -_ JOSEPH E. SHANNON 1 D.B. 856 -600 I R04400- 002 - 034 -00� I PARCEL ID I 00 — D B 1130 -20 1 I N/F x I R04400- 002 -035 1 I MARY J. SHANNON N/F G I� X X X I D.B. 1240 -1612 I I CHARLIE M. WALLACE, 25 1 x'I 1 x I D.B. 3240 -220 1 ��o Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 I I PARCEL ID# I R04400- 002 - 036 -000 N/F MARY L. WALLACE jrxn D.B. 1397 -656 PROPOSED HYDRANT, TYP. W know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE W 0 25 50 100 200 Pj I SCALE: 1 " =50' PL LA Z O rn w z 0 Q 0 L_ Z H Z w J U Wo w Z 00 N � �D D 0C Z Q U o U o W Viz° U W N s~ O N o Z U � `p Zz Z O A w � In H �Q 0 WW��U N 11 F LD O 0� a CO o Q > > Z LL Z F- 00 o Z_ J J d U <� (DLL Z_ D Q � 0 O 0 W� 0� > Z Z Y d ZW< Qz nQW C)X 0(00L) aE SEAL SUP-1 PEI JOB #: 19244.PE 1 I N/F x I R04400- 002 -035 1 I MARY J. SHANNON N/F G I� X X X I D.B. 1240 -1612 I I CHARLIE M. WALLACE, 25 1 x'I 1 x I D.B. 3240 -220 1 ��o Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 I I PARCEL ID# I R04400- 002 - 036 -000 N/F MARY L. WALLACE jrxn D.B. 1397 -656 PROPOSED HYDRANT, TYP. W know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE W 0 25 50 100 200 Pj I SCALE: 1 " =50' PL LA Z O rn w z 0 Q 0 L_ Z H Z w J U Wo w Z 00 N � �D D 0C Z Q U o U o W Viz° U W N s~ O N o Z U � `p Zz Z O A w � In H �Q 0 WW��U N 11 F LD O 0� a CO o Q > > Z LL Z F- 00 o Z_ J J d U <� (DLL Z_ D Q � 0 O 0 W� 0� > Z Z Y d ZW< Qz nQW C)X 0(00L) aE SEAL SUP-1 PEI JOB #: 19244.PE EXISTING SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESS: PARCEL ID: TOTAL TRACT AREA: SUP AREA: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND CLASSIFICATION: OWNER INFORMATION: DEVELOPMENT DATA PROVIDED UNITS PROVIDED DENSITY 288 UNITS 115.6 AC COMMERCIAL SF COMBINED OFFICE / RETAIL BUILDING HEIGHT (12) 3 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 2 -STORY BUILDINGS (1) 1 -STORY BUILDING 7241 MARKET ST. R04400- 001 - 003 -000 ± 30.84 AC ± 15.6 AC B -2 URBAN & GENERAL RES. COSWALD, LLC. 1030 E. WENDOVER AVE. GREENSBORO, NC 27405 288 UNITS 18.4 UNITS /AC 7,466 SF TOTAL 40' MAX. 35' 25' 20' DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1. All development shall be in accordance with the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. 2. Project shall comply with all Federal, State & New Hanover County regulations. 3. No public R.O.W proposed. All roads/ drives to be private and maintained by H.O.A. 4. H.O.A. to maintain all open space, buffer areas, stormwater management elements and parking facilities. LIGHTING NOTES 1. All site lighting to comply with Section 60.6 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. 2. All site lighting for non - residential or multi - family uses shall be located and directed so as not to shine or reflect directly onto any adjacent residential zoning districts and /or uses. 3. Complete site lighting plan to be provided by others prior to construction as necessary. ENERGY. PROGRESS Outdoor The energy - efficient Shoebox LED combines a decorative, contemporary style with versatility and ample lighting effect that is perfect for streets, parking lots, commercial buildings and residential communities. The Shoebox LED provides excellent color rendition along with a controlled light pattern that reduces glare and keeps the light directed only where you want A. Available in black, dark bronze, gray or white with one to four fixtures per pole. Far additional informatims, visit us at duke - energy.— J0.tdo Lighting or call us loll free at 866.769.6417. LED 205, 420, 530 watts (light Emitting Diode) Mounting heights 30', 35 Black Colors Bronze Gray White Fiberglass (205W only, I or 2 fixtures per pole) Poles Decorative tapered metal Decorative square metal Lightwume: LED (white) Replacement for' LED Wattage 205 – up to 400 -watt metal halide; LED Wattage 420; (' DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS Note: 35' pole avai.Ne in black or bmnxe only. Fiberglass 30' LED Wattage 530 – 1,000 -watt metal halide Warm -up and restrike time: Instant on (o warm -up or restrike time) Benefits Little or no installation coat Frees up capital for other projects Design services by lighting professionals included Meets industry standards and lighting ordinances Wattage BUG Rating Light Pattern Lumens Color Tamp 4,000K light distribution pattern LED 205 85 -U0 -G3 IESNA Type V (circular) 21,803 LED 205 [13-LO-G4 IESNA Type IV (forward throw) 20,555 LEO 205 B2 -U0 -G4 IESNA Type III (oval) 21,164 LED 420 B5 -UO -G5 IESNA Type V (circular) 43,317 LED 420 B3 -UO -G5 IESNA Type IV (forward throw) 39,078 LED 530 85 -U0 -G5 IESNA Type V(circular) 53,498 LED 530 B3 -UO -G5 IESNA Type IV (forward throw) 48,262 _ `These are approximate rpolar—crl suggestions; .0.1 conditions could he difler- Poles available: Name Mounting height Color I 1 Black Round tapered decorative metal- 35' Bronze o Black Gray Decorative square metal- 30' Bronze White Note: 35' pole avai.Ne in black or bmnxe only. Fiberglass 30' Black (205 W only, I or 2 fixtures per pole) Gray (205Wonly, I or2lixturesperpole) Features Benefits Little or no installation coat Frees up capital for other projects Design services by lighting professionals included Meets industry standards and lighting ordinances Maintenance included Eliminates high and unexpected repair bills Electricity included Less expensive than metered service Warranty included Worry -free One low monthly cost on your electric bill Convenience and savings for you Turnkey operation Provides hassle -free installation and service Backed by over 40 years of experience A name you can trust today ... and tomorrow •2'raised lwndation available when required on metal poles only. — ANTICIPATED LIGHTING FIXTURE EXAMPLE LEGEND — w W_ _SS PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN PROPOSED 8" SEWER MAIN PROPOSED STORM PIPE PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED BLOW -OFF VALVE PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED STREET LIGHT PARCEL ID# PARCEL ID# R03617- 001 - 094 -000 R03617- 001 - 094 -000 X X I I JACOBS RIDGE WEST JACOBS RIDGE WEST x �1— — _ X I G'� BAY HOA, INC. BAY HOA, INC.�X D.B. 3576 -824 D.B. 3576 -824 x IN 42'40'25" 1156.,96: W . W w . W INI� J�l?J11dO?�d d0 101S HOVI OZ) �- _ E N 34 °18'31 " E 1079.69' � 0� s zz:z ii ill I W W 2o'slp� ' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W'. W W. WZ lZ W ��• 8 �d W8:1d W1NEW3S -1 W �VNtd2�aW EBUFFEW W . . . W. ..W.. . `..W.. .`. . . W.. `..W.W ..... R. W W W W W W W W W .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. W .. . .. .. .. .. W . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . W y . W .. .. .. .. .. .. . W .. . W . . .. .. .. .. . . W W . W VV 4.37'SID'EBUFFER .W..WW. " " . ..�..�.�.�.�.�.WW�" " " ..�..�.W.�.� W.WW�.W.W.�.�.�.WW�.� W.WW�.�.W.�.�.�.WW�. W W W . W W W W.W W.�. .�.�.�.�.�.W.�. .W.�. .�.W.�.�.�.�.�. . w � .. .W.W.�.�.�.�.w. .W.�. W.W.Q. .�.�.�. .W. . W.�.�. WWW� = .�. .W. .� W.� W. W / •-W _\ .�.. �� =Y W .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . .. . . W .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... W . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . ..48.12' SIDE BUFFER' . .. .. . . .. . .. . . .. - W .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .= . �-o F —IT \ �O fit, � G' �S I68.75'S DE LLDG S��TBACK w — — a — — — — _ _ — — — a — — I , y o W W W W I I ji 96.25' SIDE BLDG SETBACK W I a e to ()Cf) N g Q 00000 -o I I W ~ xmNLLF- � (n U) U APARTMENT BLDG 1 APARTMENT BLDG 3 N I MIXED -USE 3 STORY 3 STORY ❑ _ PARCEL ID# N BLDG 1 (24) UNITS (24) UNITS =� to (0 I R03617- 001 - 001 -000 I I 4 3 STORY N (7 0 N/F W W II 5,326 SF COMMERCIAL m m CAMELOT (20) STUDIO APTS I m cn } 1- } 1- CAMPGROUND, INC. � Q � Q zoZ ZpZ 4 D.B. 1863 -212 60' yWW.I Q WOE g�� :2 cn c) N M ll W W a ~ N ~ Ch N _ II w.`W .I a a I In VILLAGE GREEN +0.34 AC (n .WWW I ___J _ I�� 1 I / i VI/ �M S o 'rn 1 I 5 1 UKMVVA I EK Q L n N MANAGEMENT AREA 1 I R I � II W. I I ••, • I I � C/� II / O) W I 1 POOL I cn I�� WWWI °• a — a I O I :W:WI 1 0 0 F- 0~ ~0Z �Of~ U w�� 4 4 WOE w�� � c4 I 1 I AMENITY BLDG .I .. °4. � M 1 STORY I � Q Q I CA l O co 00 I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT; 5,800 SF I. Q APARTMENT BLDG 9 Q a_ I c 1 ° NOT INCLUDED IN S.U.P. \ PROPOSAL \ / 3 STORY W . I I X (24) UNITS W ts I STREETLIGHT, TYP.; SEE ABOVE to P tll> IW W° W I 1 SHEETS FOR ANTICIPATED a � D p I N SPECIFICATION S I LIGHT FIXTURE EXAMPLE \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — W ILLL.LL ILL cn WAIN WAN II _ II S.U.P. BOUNDARY / , f \ — 1 II _ I O' S — — �. _ S 42 °37'29" W — II 343.50'— _ I Lu II II Q x PARCEL ID# I PARCEL ID# R04400- 002 - 032 -000 I 1 Z Fq W 04400- 002 - 031 -0011 /SHANNONI N/F JOSEPH E. SHANNON I x 1 1 o JOSEPH E 1 PARCEL ID# _ - D.B. 1130 -20 1 D.B. 856 -600 R04400- 002 - 034 -000 I PARCEL ID I N/F x1 R04400- 002 -035 =C L 1 I MARY J. SHANNON I N/F l X X X 1 D.B. 1240 -1612 I I CHARLIE M. WALLACE, 25.1 x D.B. 3240 -220 Z - x'I 1 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 �D Z p N 0 w MSS i S 42 °37'29" W 1 � I 1 PARCEL ID# 1 R04400- 002 - 036 -000 I N/F MARY L. WALLACE D.B. 1397 -656 REMAINING PARCEL AREA; NOT INCLUDED IN S.U.P. PROPOSAL W know what's below. Call before you dig. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 200 SCALE: 1 "= 50' Z ,O 0 Lu z O a O W z_ Z W J U Wo w Z - 0 0 N o0 �D Z p N 0 w C o0 w �z Z N o U ,—, `p � �Zz Z A w � �CA H �Q 0 UW��U 0 Q �, �UULD N II –a — O �� a U Q > > Z Z 00 o o LL F- J < d' Z Lu Z W 0 W �Otn ZWaw o O Lid > ZZY HQ0QW d L) Z X D oaio0L) SEAL SUP-2 PEI JOB #: 19244.PE PUBLIC COMMENTS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 13 - 1 Schuler, Brad From: Clark, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 7:07 PM To: Schuler, Brad Subject: FW: Ogden apartments Wayne Clark I Planning & Land Use Director Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7164 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcqov.com From: Michael Stambaugh <mikestambaugh @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 7:02 PM To: Clark, Wayne <wclark @nhcgov.com> Subject: Ogden apartments Please consider not approving large scale building at 7241 market st. That area is already heavily congested and experiences many accidents. Also extremely long red light times trying to cross or get onto market st. Imagine having another 400 cars trying to get onto market. There are currently 4 other roads that connect to Lendire in that short stretch of road. Starbucks, bojangles, wilm basketball center and the road from Ogden park all empty into lendire on that small quarter mile stretch. Thats an accident waiting to happen. Its already hard trying to pull onto Lendire from any of those roads. Let alone having that large complex with 288 apartments with all its cars also trying to pull out. Also that area experienced heavy flooding in July and August last year due to slow drainage. Then with Hurricane Florence it had massive flooding and some homes were trashed. Where will all the rain runoff go ? The area does not have enough drainage and there's nowhere else for the water to go. It cannot be ran under market to the other side. It can only be ran back into the home developments that already drain slow. Please don't allow this massive 12 building construction to be approved. Please save our neighborhoods. Mike Stambaugh CCS, CDIP Inpatient Coder UPMC Pinnacle 111 South Front Street. Harrisbura. PA 17101 Phone: 717 - 364 -5119 Email: MStambaugh(@PinnacleHealth.orq Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 1 Schuler, Brad From: Clark, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 10:19 AM To: Schuler, Brad; Vafier, Ken; Roth, Rebekah Subject: Fwd: New mixed use apartments complex Get Outlook for 10S Wayne Clark I Planning & Land Use Director Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7164 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcqov.com From: Mary Sheffield <mjsheffi @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 10:07:12 AM To: Barfield, Jonathan <jbarfield @nhcgov.com >; Olson - Boseman, Julia <joboseman @nhcgov.com >; Zapple, Rob <rzapple @nhcgov.com >; White, Woody <wwhite @nhcgov.com >; Crowell, Kym <KCrowell @nhcgov.com >; Kusek, Patricia <pkusek @nhcgov.com >; Clark, Wayne <wclark @nhcgov.com> Subject: New mixed use apartments complex This property is situated adjacent to Market Street. The wetland which they have marked as undeveloped is a problem. During Florence this wetland overflowed onto Market, ran across the road into the parking lot next to Ogden Tap and continued on into the Wendover neighborhood and flooded Brightleaf. So more concrete, more run off is the first issue. Second issue is the 288 units which if 2 cars per unit would dump 500+ cars onto Market and increase traffic on already congested street. The shopping portion would increase that. We have just about everything in shopping we need in the area and what we don't have Mayfaire does! Then there's the school issue if these people have children. Where are they going in an already overflowing system? I understand the need for more housing but a development rather than another apartment complex would be more suitable for this area. Even townhomes or duplexes would be better. You would still have some grassy area to absorb the runoff. We have a 48 unit townhomes in process off Futch Ck which will add another estimated 100 cars to Market. The improvement to Market will be out dated before it is completed. We have overflow from Hampstead area which is growing but doesn't have the amenities so they come to Wilmington. I suggest that you have a day trip planned as a group and come ride Market Street from Military to I140 around lunch or morning before 9 or afternoon between 4:30 -6. But even more surprising is the traffic after 10am. It's a nightmare and I'll bet the accident rate in this area is higher than anywhere in the county. Please stand with us and refuse this multi use complex. Please review the article in the link below. Thank you! Mary and Ed Sheffield Residents of Ogden since 1970. i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 2 Native to Wilmington https:llportcitydaily. comllocal- newsl2019 /08/08l new - mixed - use - development- with -28 8- multi - family- units -and- commercial- space - proposed- for - north - market- street/?utm_ source= Morning +Headlines +Subscribers + %E2 %80 %A2 +Port+Cite_ campaign =f8dc6 715cl- EMAIL CAMPAIGN 2018_06_01 03 11 COPY 01 &utm medium = email &utm term =0 afcb4c5de5- f8dc6715cl- 28648513 Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 3 Schuler, Brad From: karen lea <kjlea @hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 12:59 PM To: Clark, Wayne; Vafier, Ken; Bouffard, Christine; Brown, Denise; Gough, Robert; McDonnell, Dylan; Meredith, Ron; Painter, Linda; Roth, Rebekah; Santure, Julia; Schuler, Brad; Smith, Gideon; Gartin, Jyll Subject: More apartment buildings in Ogden? Hello everyone! I want to weigh in on the new apartment complex proposed for the Ogden area. I don't know if any of you live in the Ogden area but I do. I am so discouraged by the amount of car lots, storage building and apartment buildings on our side of town. Traffic is so congested and the drive thru our area so unappealing. I was born here in 1957 and I have seen a lot of change and I am not against progress ... I am not one to say I wish it was like it use to be. I know change will happen but want us to be smart about it. I am sure you all know we were successful with keeping the old oaks at Publix and Starbucks and the new car wash .... why because we all care so much about this area. Please reconsider more apartments. Sincerely, Karen Lea 7238 Nordic Drive Wilmington, NC 28411 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 4 Schuler, Brad From: Sue Skoda <sue.mort1228 @yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 5:16 PM To: Clark, Wayne; Vafier, Ken; Bouffard, Christine; Brown, Denise; Gough, Robert; McDonnell, Dylan; Meredith, Ron; Painter, Linda; Roth, Rebekah; Santure, Julia; Schuler, Brad; Smith, Gideon; Gartin, Jyll Subject: Ogden Aprtments Special Use Permit Good Afternoon, I am a resident in the Ogden area, Marsh Oaks and have been over the past 18 years. I have witnessed the destruction of this area by continuous building of apartments, car wash establishments, storage units and other buildings with large and unused concrete parking lots. Over building is destroying our green space /air /water and creating more traffic congestion, accidents and poor quality of life for all of us. Market Street was graded an "F" 10 years ago and yet, county officials continue to allow residential units within commercial districts that only increase the congestion/ accidents on the roads, increase the cost of living due to high insurance rates due to a "high accident rates" in this area, impinge on our water supply and make it unbearable to commute. It takes me 15 -25 minutes to travel 4 miles! I've witness at least one accident every day in this area. With Amberleigh Shores (over 500 apartments when completed) less than a mile away, why would anyone who is concerned about our safety and what is good for the people, allow another complex in the same vicinity ? ?? I am requesting that before you approve this permit to please look at all the available accident data, the fact that Market Street is the ONLY route for emergency evacuation as well as emergency vehicles, that alternate routes are not available. With more concrete and less green space, the roads easily become flooded and that is another real safety and health issue especially in our hurricane prone area. Please do what is right for the people and not the greedy developers and realtors! Looking forward to your response and thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Susan Skoda, RN, MSN (Retired) 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 5 Schuler, Brad From: amanda smith <klaesmith11 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 5:18 PM To: Clark, Wayne; Vafier, Ken; Bouffard, Christine; Brown, Denise; Gough, Robert; McDonnell, Dylan; Meredith, Ron; Painter, Linda; Roth, Rebekah; Santure, Julia; Schuler, Brad; Smith, Gideon; Gartin, Jyll Subject: RE: Proposed Middle Sound West Good Afternoon: As an Ogden property owner, NHC taxpayer, and registered voter, I am writing this email as a formal request that you not approve the building of the Middle Sound West appartment complex off of Lendire and Market Street in Ogden. This area is already over conjested with traffic. Having a son that just started driving last year and another starting next year, the idea of how much more traffic to this area this project would bring is very concerning to me. This particular property is already prone to flooding. If it's built up, where will all of this water go during the next hurricane? Can the developer guarantee that flooding won't be made worse? With the situation of school over crowding, how will a 228 unit complex affect the schools in this area? We have to assume there will be school -aged children living there? I'm hoping these are your concerns also considering that you represent us. I haven't spoken to one citizen who is for Middle Sound West to be built. Please listen to us. Kind Regards, Amanda Smith Ogden Resident i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 6 Schuler, Brad From: georgia vick <gvick1950 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 9:20 PM To: Clark, Wayne; Vafier, Ken; Bouffard, Christine; Brown, Denise; Gough, Robert; McDonnell, Dylan; Meredith, Ron; Painter, Linda; Roth, Rebekah; Santure, Julia; Schuler, Brad; Smith, Gideon; Gartin, Jyll Subject: Apartment complex to be added on corner of Market and Lendire Please vote NO to this proposal. The beauty of our city is being destroyed by the addition of these huge apartment complexes! There is little being done to address the aging infrastructure in this city. The roads are a mess and especially Market Street! Adding more cars to an antiquated roadway is insane! We need less representation by builders and those involved in real estate and more representation by common caring citizens! What are you as our voices thinking when you continue to ignore traffic problems and infrastructure issues , yet continue to approve these complexes ? ? ? ?? Please vote NO and listen to the people you represent! Thanks. Marvin and Georgia Vick 741 Squire Lane Wilmington NC 28411 i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 7 Schuler, Brad From: Clark, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:24 PM To: Schuler, Brad; Vafier, Ken Subject: Fwd: Proposed Apartments 7241 Market St These can just go to brads file Get Outlook for iOS Wayne Clark I Planning & Land Use Director Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7164 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcaov.com From: Brown, Denise <dbrown @nhcgov.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:14 PM To: Planning & Zoning Subject: FW: Proposed Apartments 7241 Market St Please see enclosed...... Denise Brown I Administrative Technician Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7116 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcaov.com From: cape_ linda= yahoo.com @webformsnhcgov.com < cape_ linda= yahoo.com @webformsnhcgov.com> On Behalf Of Steve and Linda Cooper Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:09 PM To: Brown, Denise <dbrown @nhcgov.com> Subject: Proposed Apartments 7241 Market St Please select the department you would like to direct your inquiry to: 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 8 Planning & Land Use (Zoning) Name Steve and Linda Cooper Email cape Iinda(@yahoo.com Subject Proposed Apartments 7241 Market St Your Message August 18, 2019 To: New Hanover County Commissioners, My husband and I are writing this email to discuss the proposed apartment complex called Middle Sound West, 7241 Market Street. This complex will border our sweet, little neighborhood called Palm Grove (Lido Dr and Palm Grove Dr) in Ogden. We are TOTALLY against this apartment complex for a number of reasons: - Wilmington needs to take a breath and reevaluate what is happening to our beloved city. The traffic has become horrible, construction projects are everywhere! We are blessed to know a large number of senior citizens due to our involvement in a number of groups /clubs. Everyone is constantly talking about the traffic issue that we now have here in Wilmington. We just keep building, when is this going to stop? We all moved here for the small city feel, the beaches, the ease of traffic and the sweet, little neighborhoods. We are destroying all of that with the nonstop building! - Torchwood Blvd. has been refigured so the current traffic on Lendire Rd has increased greatly. Once basketball season begins, the parking around Wilmington Basketball Center is crazy AND Starbucks on Lendire Rd is about to open? Please drive down to Lendire Road and watch the traffic now! Plus Lendire has always been a private road with very poor maintanence (huge potholes). So, who thinks it's a good idea to add 288 apartments with maybe 600 cars coming and going daily? -Where are all these kids going to go to school? -Ogden currently has a lot going on which is very unattractive — all the overpass construction, widening of Market Street construction, cardboard signs being stuck into every corner... Now, we're going to build 288 apartments? We use to be proud to show off my city to visitors, but that's not true anymore. Please give us a break so we can get this area looking nice again! -There are a lot of small neighborhoods in this area, ours included. We do our best to maintain our neighborhood but those in government positions now want to devalue our homes and destroy the aesthetics we love about our surroundings? -We need a Beautification Committee here in Wilmington before our charming city is destroyed any further! Someone needs to be cognizant about the way these construction projects are impacting our traffic, our schools, the aesthetics and our neighborhoods. We are hoping that y'all will be that committee and you'll vote this project down. We thank you for listening and hope to see you at one of the upcoming meetings on this project as we plan on attending all of them. 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 9 Steve and Linda Cooper 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 10 Schuler, Brad From: Clark, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 7:09 AM To: Schuler, Brad Subject: FW: Apartments on Lendire Wayne Clark I Planning & Land Use Director Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7164 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcqov.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Melissa Siano <melsiano @icloud.com> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:42 PM To: Clark, Wayne <wclark @nhcgov.com> Subject: Apartments on Lendire Good Evening. I am a homeowner here in Wilmington, residing in The Ogden area. I am messaging about these proposed apartments to go on Lendire ?! This is absolute insanity for several reasons. Number one being the location has NO ROOM for that many people. A restaurant would be bad enough let alone apartments ?! It will not only be a safety issue but it will bring down our house values, bring problems and the traffic will be absolutely out of control. This should not even be up for discussion. Ogden has enough apartments right now as it is. Our once beautiful residential neighborhood does not need this! We beg of you to turn this down no matter the amount of money involved! I will have many people emailing, calling and turning up for this meeting! We have had major flooding problems in this area also and this will be another place that the water has nowhere to go! Make this a huge place for the water drain to before apartments are even an option! Thank you, Melissa Jackson 1577 Maple Ridge Rd Sent from my iPhone i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 11 T_ Betti Fah y Sui:)rec Proposed 288 apartment complex in Ogden �? ete Aug 18, 2019 at 11:18:41 AM 10 jbarfield @nhcgov.com My husband and I are writing this letter to discuss the proposed apartment complex in Ogden ( called Middle SoundWest, 7241 Market street). The "proposed" complex will border our neighborhood "Palm Grove" (Lido Dr and Palm Grove dr). We are vehemently against this project for a variety of reasons to include: Where are all these kids going to school? We already have way too much traffic. Torchwood Blvd.s reconfiguration has increased traffic in our area. Lendire Rd is a nightmare. The road is poorly maintained as it is. There are significant potholes all over the place. Lendire and the surrounding roads can barely withstand the existing traffic. To add 288 apartments with the projected increase of 600 cars is ludicrous. Ogden has a lot going on which is very unattractive. This includes all the overpass construction, widening of market street construction, increased traffic. Now they want to build 288 apartments? Our neighborhood and surrounding neighborhood's are being greatly impacted by this. We have enough new residential and commercial houses and businesses in our town. Please vote this project down. Elizabeth Grennan -Fahy William Fahy 101 Lido Drive Wilmington,NC �l Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 12 Schuler, Brad From: Sent: To: Subject: Crowell, Kym Tuesday, September 24, 2019 4:41 PM Schuler, Brad FW: Bloomington Ln., Wendover Ln., Bright Leaf Rd. Flooding during Dorian & the Proposed "Middlesound West" 288 apartments & Mixed Use Development Kym Crowell I Clerk To The Board County Commissioners New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7143 p 1 (910) 798 -7145 f www.nhcaov.com From: Betsy Albright <betsy.b.albright @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 8:12 PM To: Barfield, Jonathan <jbarfield @nhcgov.com >; Kusek, Patricia <pkusek @nhcgov.com >; joboseman @nhc.gov.com; White, Woody <wwhite @nhcgov.com >; Zapple, Rob <rzapple @nhcgov.com >; Crowell, Kym <KCrowell @nhcgov.com> Subject: Bloomington Ln., Wendover Ln., Bright Leaf Rd. Flooding during Dorian & the Proposed "Middlesound West" 288 apartments & Mixed Use Development Dear County Commissioners, I am writing you to urge you to reject the proposed "Middlesound West" Development of 288 apartments and mixed -use retail /office spacein Ogden. It is inappropriate at this time when widespread flooding is an ongoing issue. Our county needs to reform our storm water management. Due to rising ocean temperatures, storms are increasing in size, are wetter, and moving slower than in the past. Florence was a record setter for rain here, dumping over 30 inches of rain. Dorian brought flooding to Ogden again. Texas is getting hammered with Imelda's 35 inches of rain in a 24 -hour period. This is our new reality and we need to plan for it now. Plan for 35 inches of rain in a 24 -hour period because that is the new reality. The four guiding principles for approving this project are as follows: 1. Can the applicant prove they use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and approved? Will flooding on my street get worse and finally breach my home or any one else's? Will the silt dug up from developing this tract end up washed being deposited in culverts, blocking drainage pipes? Will the impervious surfaces push water toward the wetlands which flows toward my neighborhood? Please see pictures attached. If the applicant can indeed prove that it won't harm my property, I would like it in writing so that if my husband and I incur flooding damages to our property we will know who to hold responsible. The front section of this property is wetlands. Adding impervious surfaces will push water to the wetlands which overflows over Market Street, runs downhill toward Wendover Ln. and Ogen Tap Room. The torrent of water broke the through concrete curb behind Big Lots and floods the yards, houses and street of Bright Leaf Ln. See flooding pictures from Dorian attached. i Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 13 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance; This property is Zoned B -2 Highway Business, not a Mixed Use High- Density Residential Development. Granting Special Use Permits should be a rare occurrence. Otherwise, it undermines the intent of the current zoning and the keeping of the character of the land area. 3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; I am already seeing on public forums that some locals are advising newcomers looking to re- locate to this area to stay away from Torchwood area properties because of flooding. Public perception already perceives these apartments as being a flooding threat to nearby homes which in turn injures property values of neighboring homes. The use of 288 apartments at the Market Street/Middle Sound /Lendire is most definitely not a public necessity. There are other lots suited for that use and already zoned for that use. 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the County's adopted plans for growth and development. 288 apartments at "Middlesound West" would not be in harmony with the area, as it is a highway business zone, not a high- density residential neighborhood zone. That intersection's traffic is already horrific. That intersection is the only way in and only way out for 15,000+ Middle Sound Loop residents. There will be no harmony at that intersection if you add an additional 1,000 high- density residents in close proximity to that intersection. We have 3 1/2 years of road improvements to begin on Market St. between Middle Sound Loop and Marsh Oaks Dr. Don't add to the chaos it already is for over 15,000 residents. Thank you for your attention. Please say no to the "Middlesound West" Development. We need more green space in this county. Please preserve green space or we'll end up looking like the strip at Myrtle Beach. Tacky! Best regards, Betsy Albright Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Betsy Albright <betsy.b.albri hghtt&gmail.com> Date: September 15, 2019 at 3:41:56 PM EDT To: jiannucciknhc og v.com, jmaygnhcgov.com Cc: Betsy Albright <betsy.b.albrightkgmail.com >, Adam Albright <adamsalbrightglive.com> Subject: Bloomington Ln., Wendover Ln., Bright Leaf Rd. Flooding during Dorian 9 -5 -19 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 14 J My husband and I own and live at 209 Bloomington Ln. (gray house with blue shudders on left). Looking eastward, Street flooding is a concern. 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 15 Our neighbors's ditch at 205 Bloomington Ln. during Dorian. Their ditch is always clean, but you can see that the water level is threatening their air conditioning unit by the green bushes. 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 16 Street flooding on Bloomington Ln. The mailbox on the left is 205. The mailbox on the right is 204. 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 17 204 Bloomington Ln. Full drainage ditch. Flooding streets. 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 18 of .� °.+ ^� . � 1 __r' —�� '�' _ — ; .. � _ .aer�ar .�_. __ '• � ley- Close up of drainage ditch beside 204 Bloomington Ln. Street flooding. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 19 213 Bloomington Ln.'s driveway flooding and water encroaching into front lawn. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 20 Drainage ditch between 212 Bloomington Ln. (on left) and 208 Bloomington Ln. with subsequent street flooding. The front lawns of 213 Bloomington Ln. and 209 Bloomington Ln. under water. Water creeping up driveways. 9 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 21 Another picture of drainage ditch between 212 Bloomington Ln. (house on left) and 208 Bloomington Ln. (house on right). Foreground is my front yard at 209 Bloomington Ln. 10 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 22 Wendover Ln. at Cloverfield Ct. intersection looking east. 213 Wendover Ln. on the left. Flood waters had started to recede between rain bands. You can see that the flood waters had gotten to the corner of Cloverfield Ct. on right. 11 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 23 Close up of the flood waters on Wendover Ln. 213 Wendover on left. You can see the receding flood waters went all the way up to Cloverfield Ct. 12 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 24 Wendover and Bright Leaf Rd. Street flooding. 13 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 25 Close up of street flooding on Bright Leaf Rd. Kayak in background. Our neighbors. 14 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 26 Another close up of street flooding on Bright Leaf Rd. 7303 Bright Leaf Rd.'s mailbox in the foreground on left. Kayak in the background. As you can see, we are experiencing flooding issues in the Wendover area of Ogden. It wasn't like this two or three years ago. We are not near a waterway. We are not in a flood zone. We are not near Page's Creek, Smith Creek, the ICWW, or the Atlantic Ocean. Yet, here we are. Widespread flooding. Please help! My lot at 209 Bloomington Ln. is at the mercy of others as we have no access to drainage ditches on our property. It's all interconnected and it's a domino effect. Help! Thanks for your attention, Betsy Albright Home owner at 209 Bloomington Ln. 910 - 279 -5013 Sent from my Whone 15 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 27 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 28 it ,,,j � � > ` ' �. � ' < . � ' / � � r ' x � � / ` ! / Board of Commissioners ' June 1.2O2O Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 30 -<\ ` s \ � . \ . - ' \ % Board of Commisi ITEM Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 32 Schuler, Brad From: Crowell, Kym Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:37 PM To: Schuler, Brad Subject: FW: Proposed Middlesound West development For your file on this matter... Kym Crowell I Clerk To The Board County Commissioners New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7143 p 1 (910) 798 -7145 f www.nhcaov.com From: Tami Procopio <tamidee007 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 4:11 PM To: Barfield, Jonathan <jbarfield @nhcgov.com >; Kusek, Patricia <pkusek @nhcgov.com >; Olson - Boseman, Julia <joboseman @nhcgov.com >; White, Woody <wwhite @nhcgov.com >; Zapple, Rob <rzapple @nhcgov.com >; Crowell, Kym <I<Crowell @nhcgov.com> Subject: Proposed Middlesound West development Dear County Commissioners: I am writing you on behalf of my community and as a very upset and concerned citizen of New Hanover County. My husband and I have lived in the G1enRidge at Westbay Estates community for 22 years. During this time we have seen our flooding problem go from bad to horrendous. After 80% of the homes in my community flooded into the homes during Florence and my home came within two inches of flooding into our home during Dorian, I am learning that it is in the hands of you to approve a special use permit for yet another unnecessary development in this part of Ogden. I understand that Middlesound West is proposed for retail space and 288 apartments. This is absurd. There is already a chronic flooding problem in this area as well as a severe infrastructure problem. Not only can the land not handle more concrete and asphalt, the streets can't handle more cars and the schools can't handle more students. There is already an over building of apartment buildings in this part of town..... Gordon Road, Market St. towards Porters Neck and Military Cutoff towards Mayfaire. We have been informed that the storm water run off in this area is inadequate due to an old system that needs major work to update. Of which, there's no money for at this time. So in the meantime, our option is to wait for our home to flood again, or sell it to someone else and let it become their problem. There are 68 homes in G1enRidge and I'd say that 7 or 8 have been sold since Florence. We should not be forced into selling our home due to the county's poor decision making. This should not be happening! I would suggest that the county commissioners start looking at the impact of your decisions on people's lives as opposed to a bank account. Tax revenue isn't worth people having to sacrifice all they've worked for because of poor decisions in allowing over building in areas not meant for the development. I know that I speak for the vast majority of people who live in this part of Ogden. Nobody wants this development and we certainly don't need it. There's plenty of empty retail space in this county already. Look at Mayfaire and all the empty spots that have never been filled since expanding the section where H &M is rented. Also, there are plenty of other (not flood prone) areas where apartments can be built. I am asking you to strongly look at the impact of this special use permit and what it will potentially do to those of us living in this area. I hope that you make the right decision and decline this special use permit. 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 33 Thank you for your consideration to this important request. Joe and Tami Procopio 319 Smallwood Ct. Wilmington, NC 28411 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 34 Schuler, Brad From: Crowell, Kym Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:39 PM To: Schuler, Brad Subject: FW: Proposed Middle sound West Development Kym Crowell I Clerk To The Board County Commissioners New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7143 p 1 (910) 798 -7145 f www.nhcqov.com From: skayel4= yahoo.com @webformsnhcgov.com <skayel4= yahoo.com @webformsnhcgov.com> On Behalf Of Sandy Pruett Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 10:32 AM To: Crowell, Kym <KCrowell @nhcgov.com> Subject: Proposed Middle sound West Development Please select the department you would like to direct your inquiry to: County Commissioners & Clerk to the Board Name Sandy Pruett Email skaye14C@yahoo.com Subject Proposed Middle sound West Development Your Message Please, please reconsider the the proposed Middlesound West housing development /apartments located behind the KOA camping ground off Market street in Ogden. Ogden cannot take anymore strain on their drainage system. Two developments are going up on Gordon which is a bad idea. More traffic on Gordon Road! Yay, just what that dangerous street needs. Anyone that lives in that area knows that when we have a storm or heavy rain the flooding is terrible. Lucky homeowners hold our breath as the water rises to their porches and inches from their doorways. Unlucky homeowners continue to get their homes flooded. Enough is enough. People are unhappy with the way the area is being over built. Please make good decisions. Thank you 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 35 Schuler, Brad From: Sent: To: Subject: Importance: Crowell, Kym Friday, September 20, 2019 1:18 PM Schuler, Brad FW: Glenridge at West Bay Estates Homeowners objection to new building High Kym Crowell I Clerk To The Board County Commissioners New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7143 p 1 (910) 798 -7145 f www.nhcqov.com From: workorders @aib - hoa.com <workorders @aib - hoa.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 11:23 AM To: Barfield, Jonathan <jbarfield @nhcgov.com >; Kusek, Patricia <pkusek @nhcgov.com >; Olson- Boseman, Julia <joboseman @nhcgov.com >; White, Woody <wwhite @nhcgov.com >; Zapple, Rob <rzapple @nhcgov.com >; Crowell, Kym < KC rowe I I @ n h cgov. co m > Cc: Benjamin Hughes <Benjaminhughesl @ gmail.com>; Jason Smith <e.jasonsmith @yahoo.com >; Malorie Slusher <mhslusher @gmail.com >; Michael Rose <michael.rose98 @ gmail.com>; Michael Staublin <mpstau0l @gmail.com> Subject: Glenridge at West Bay Estates Homeowners objection to new building Importance: High Glenridge at West Bay Estates Homeowners Association — Board of Directors September 19, 2019 <jbarfieldAnhcgov.com >, <pkusekknhc,gov.com >, <jobosemankrific,gov.com >, <wwhiteknhcgov.com >, <rzappleknhcgov.com >, <kcrowellc�r�,nhcgov.com> New Hanover County Dear County Commissioners; We are writing you to make sure you are aware of our Community's stance on the proposed development of Middlesound West, retail space and 288 apartments. 80% of Glenridge at West Bay Estates Community flooded during Florence and many of the homes came close to flooding again during Dorian. The addition of more impervious surface to this area will not help this already strained flooding situation. Our neighborhood has already been informed by your office that the storm water system is inadequate and out of date, Post Florence. Why compound an already bad situation with more unnecessary building? Almost a dozen homes have sold in the neighborhood since Florence, and this flooding situation is already beginning to affect our property values. Some people have yet to get the funding to rebuild after Florence and now Dorian and the threat of more.... We feel that no new building should take place until the flooding and storm water situation is under 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 36 control for the current homes in the area. Attached are photos of flooding from Hurricane Florence and also of Hurricane Dorian. Do the right thing and vote to reject this special zoning permit. Sincerely the 68 homeowners, Board of Directors — Glenridge at West Bay Estates Link to photos from Dorian: https: // photos .app.goo.gl /aYutu318gnJihsN87 Link to photos from Florence: https: / /drive.google.com/ open? id= lcgQUYtrori78vnikZxZgzZstLbH2XmDk Jennifer AIB Specializing in HOA Management Providing HOA Management with Accountability, Integrity & Balance PO Box 1124 Carolina Beach, NC 28428 P: 910 - 458 -0818 F: 910 - 338 -3933 www.aib - hoa.com NOTE: Please be advised that any work orders sent via email will take longer to process, please submit all work orders on the www.aib - hoa.com website (owner login required). This message, and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee or if you have received this email by mistake, you should not disseminate, print, distribute or copy this e -mail. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e -mail from your system. 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 37 Schuler, Brad From: Crowell, Kym Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 9:12 AM To: Schuler, Brad Subject: Fwd: Middlesound Development Ogden Kym Crowell Clerk to the Board NHC Board of Commissioners (910) 798 -7149 Kym Crowell I Clerk To The Board County Commissioners New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7143 p 1 (910) 798 -7145 f www.nhcqov.com From: Betty Garner <bgarner917 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 4:56:06 PM To: Barfield, Jonathan <jbarfield @nhcgov.com >; Kusek, Patricia <pkusek @nhcgov.com >; Olson- Boseman, Julia <joboseman @nhcgov.com >; White, Woody <wwhite @nhcgov.com >; Zapple, Rob <rzapple @nhcgov.com >; Crowell, Kym <KCrowell @nhcgov.com> Subject: Middlesound Development Ogden We have lived in Wilmington for many years. Moved away but moving back soon. After hurricane Dorian I was horrified at the flooding on Torchwood, Courtney Pines area and so was everyone else! I have talked with Pat Kusek. And this is one reason why ..... over development and county commissioners approving it!! We're moving to Courtney Pines in 2 weeks. I hope that all of you take this seriously, homes are going to be flooded!! Stop building in this area! 1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 12- 14 - 38 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler and Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z19 -14) - Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on Behalf of the Property Owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to Rezone Approximately 52.39 Acres of Land Located Near the 8300 Block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 Block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District, in Order to Construct a Residential Development Consisting of Multi- Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing BRIEF SUMMARY: At their February 3 meeting, the Board of Commissioners granted a continuance of this item to the April 6 meeting to allow for the applicant to address stormwater concerns raised by the North Carolina Coastal Federation in a January 29 letter to the Board of Commissioners. After meeting with the applicant, the Coastal Federation provided updated comments to the Commissioners which included correcting errors regarding the State's Coastal Stormwater Program built upon area (BUA) requirements. No modifications were made to the proposal since the February meeting. The item was not considered at the April 6 or May 4 meetings due to the COVI D -19 situation. The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 52.39 acres from R -15 and R -20 to (CZD) RMF -L in order to construct a residential development consisting of multi- family, duplex, and single - family housing. The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed at a community meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units. The plan for the Board of Commissioners' consideration has been reduced to 300 units from the original 406 units proposed, including the elimination of 108 apartments. The applicant's current plan proposes 204 apartments, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family dwellings for a density of 5.7 du /ac. In addition, since the initial application, the height and unit count has been reduced for six of the proposed multi- family buildings located adjacent to existing single - family residences along the northern property line. Specifically, the buildings were reduced from 3 stories to 2 stories, and from 24 units to 16 units. The proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi- family on the western portion of the site to duplex and then single - family on the east end of the site. The proposed multi- family housing, and the majority of the units for the project, are located closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is the major commercial node of the northern portion of the County and is identified as one of three Growth Nodes in the Comprehensive Plan. According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds and an infiltration basin. The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 100 - year storm event ( =10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event ( =8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13 The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained by NCDOT. The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single - family homes and 348 multi- family units on the subject property (406 total units - which exceeds the currently proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in the PM peak hour. As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family homes under the performance residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the PM peak hours. The proposed development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number of trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak. The notable roadway improvements required with the TIA include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The applicant is also proposing to add this improvement as a condition on the development. The site is classified as General Residential and Community Mixed Use in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is intended to provide alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached development, the overall project density is in -line with those characteristic of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the highest density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which is part of the Porters Neck Growth Node and designated as Community Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the orderly transition of densities and intensities. The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, numerous residents attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition presented concerns including those relating to traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. 4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi- family section of the project and the duplex housing preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing westbound travel for residents of the duplex and single - family housing in the development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction. NOTE: Two petitions have been provided by residents who oppose the application. Hard copies of the petitions have been provided to the Clerk's Office and are also viewable online at: https: / /tinyurl.com /Z19- 14petitions RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13 Staff recommends approval of the application. After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community representatives opposing the application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4 requiring a gate in the middle of the project because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff recommends this condition be removed due to this concern. Example Motion of Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: Staff Suggested Conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Example Motion of Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with conditions 1 -3 as recommended by the Planning Board and staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved with 3 conditions as recommended by the Planning Board and staff 4 -1, Commissioner Zapple dissenting. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13 SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z19 -14) Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on behalf of the property owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to rezone approximately 52.39 acres of land located near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi - Family Low Density District, in order to construct a residential development consisting of multi - family, duplex, and single - family housing. 1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1 . The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 1 Example Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z19 -14 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z19 -14 Request: Rezoning to a Multi - Family Residential Low Density District Applicant: Property Owner(s): Logan Developers, Inc. Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al Location: Acreage: Near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the 52.39 8300 block of Shiraz Way PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: Parcel ID numbers are listed in the application package. Community Mixed Use & General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Low Density Residential, Agriculture Multi - Family, Duplex, and Single - Family Housing Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -15 & R -20 (CZD) RMF -L APPLICATION BACKGROUND The proposed conceptual site plan has been modified several times since it was originally proposed at a community meeting in September 2019. Each modification reduced the total number of units. The plan being considered by the Board of Commissioners has been reduced to 300 units from the original 406 units proposed, including the elimination of 108 apartments. Because of this, technical documents (primarily the Traffic Impact Analysis) included with the application may have studied the impacts of a more intense development on the property than is currently proposed. Where possible, staff and applicant have provided updated data. Site Plan Version Proposed Units 1. Studied in TIA /First Community Meeting 406 total - 312 apts, 36 duplex, 58 SFD 2. 2 "d Community Meeting 388 total -288 apts, 34 duplex, 66 SFD 3. Initial Rezoning Application 384 total - 288 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD 4. January Planning Board Meeting 324 total -228 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD 5. May BOC Version 300 total - 204 apts, 34 duplex, 62 SFD Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 1 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 1 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single - Family Residential (Vineyard Plantation) R -15, R -20 East Undeveloped, Porters Neck Fire Station, Davis R -20, (CUD) 0&1 Community South Single - Family Residential (Tibbys Branch) R -15 Market Street/l -140 Interchange, Lowe's Home West Improvement CUD B -2 (CUD) s. ii r ��"� t+ d a �a 7�- ♦+ �� � r� � - sy�` � �#��} Q,S���le� '1�� �� Aerial ;,,�, �'� °��?- ���44 E °�� +`� ,wg4` '�`'' �"�►1� ti��+/J,'+ •` � �',y ,�`� ♦ aTGTO'�sQ.� ,,, �'�� goo � �'�'aa����,��� °�� ®avay Y °rt 9 -6,. ION �� F,p' �� �a 'r �. �" 6 � O �fi • * ? •- a!v'� ��i ;� "tiiF�v►F,�yJ� a E 1;. � w ,,�f '•fG6 �, w'/,ti`�'%i�� �Q'� � �,®''�� �'�' !r ,�\ � �I• . �" � <c *� "' a� ,� `'ors .� �k�es..��,r at, �� �,�a , L� ire 9 -14 ,� ,� `�±,� ,>► 4��tte,� F ,�-�., A +�" Neva Han ue�Cow k �_ ZONING HISTORY July 6, 1971 The site was initially zoned R -15 and R -20 (Area 5) Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 2 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 2 COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer Water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be Historic determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Porters Neck Porters Neck Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools Schools For more information, see the school statistics below. Recreation Ogden Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN "CJId" Market _ Street � -- — Site Boundary �U`L i Includes Staff LShi- ra x Way APorters Neck Road Edgewater Club Road Roundabout • The applicant's proposed conceptual plan indicates the residential development will consist of 204 multi - family units, 34 duplex units, and 62 single - family lots, for a total of 300 units. • In addition to the density reductions made after the community meetings, the overall density for the project has been reduced twice since it was submitted to the County due to feedback received from the Planning Board. The original application submitted to the Planning Board proposed at total of 384 units. The current plan has eliminated 84 apartment units from the original application. • The subject site is long and narrow (about 4,500 square feet long and 550 feet in width) impacting design options. • The 204 multi - family units will be located within 1 1 buildings containing 12 to 24 units each. Six buildings located adjacent existing single - family residences along the northern property line are proposed to be limited to 2 stories, while the remaining buildings along the southern property are proposed to be 3 stories. A 20 -foot opaque bufferyard is required between the multi - family buildings and the abutting single - family housing. Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 3 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 3 • Developments within the proposed RMF -L district may be constructed in accordance with the County's existing performance residential standards, which provides flexibility by allowing multiple housing types and not requiring minimum lot sizes. The flexibility of performance developments allows for additional land to be utilized for open space and stormwater purposes by clustering development on the site. • The applicant's proposed conceptual site plan indicates approximately 1 1.8 acres of the site (22 %) will be reserved for active and passive recreation space for the residents of the development. The total open space (undeveloped, stormwater, and buffer areas) is about 24 acres of the site (46 %). • The subject site does not directly access Market Street, requiring use of area collector roads. The primary access points will be to "Old" Market Street on the west side of the site and Shiraz Way on the east side of the site. • Roadway connections will also be made to three road stubs located in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision abutting the site to the north. However, the applicant is proposing a condition to gate these accessways and limit access to emergency vehicles only. • The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 100 -year storm event (�:-- 10 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event (�:=8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). According the County's watershed data, the downstream outfall of the site flows south toward Pages Creek. However, if this request is approved, direction of the downstream flow will be verified during the TRC review process when more detailed engineering design is completed. • According to the applicant, the stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds and an infiltration basin. The infiltration basin is proposed on the eastern end of the site near Shiraz Way. A soils test performed by the applicant where the basin is proposed indicated an infiltration rate of over 20 inches /hr. The applicant also provided an exhibit illustrating the downstream outfall. More information is provided in the applicant's submittal documents. Existing Ditch to Proposed Existing Be Cleaned 8 Culvert POPE! with Stabilized; to Oettall into Remain Unpiped Stream 'IT w,vl.rs 4, ^� al° rnG.s ORMIE YAREA UPI ... Ac ACm'E cE. HEIGHEORH6G�PARR oi ini Eruno AREA NEEGEB WaP —FOR ui GAa ness -- ouPGEx, rrP. swEEr 11TTOTA6 ewl.Glnas NAxl —I mPEnimE1€R SE.e.,�c Nnll.r wr za. rm.lsG. I1r Nrxl I�ET�R��LwTIEE�I � — _ FIRE I ®® ®�dI °000 ,01010{ °10;0 '3 $OIIS Tested In ._ Infiltration Basin proved I- —T° T� 1 T I1 7 –T ® ®E ° ? Infiltration Ratc ' �; is Very High: °Y JT -7–T; °''� Lin \ 1 vo Ii l_ SIG �+ L� 11' l THAN IN HD ormwater r� �/� �\ Existng Swale As Pond TR9 DErnE A r OuHflll for St _ 7 Ou(alls [o \ Infiltration Basin ormweter Ditch \ N N j /II. Pond Outfalls to 1 \ N Culvert Takes Water from Swale to Adjace ,it,, Z Z-1 nt PO &TEES p� RCr: &QAD yH , DItCn x 1 40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE., NEIGHBORHOOD t2fi5 AWAREVE DPEN SPACE (EXCLUDESV—LANm PROPOSED 20' 1583 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESSauTILHr Exi,75 Ditch uENr Applicant's Exhibit of the Proposed Stormwater Facilities Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 4 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 4 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Approximately 40.5 acres of the site is zoned R -15 and the remaining 11.9 acres is zoned R -20. Under the County's performance residential standards, the portion zoned R -15 would be permitted up to 102 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du /ac and the portion zoned R- 20 would be permitted up to 22 dwelling units at a density of 1.9 du /ac. The total number of units permitted under the current zoning is 124. • The proposed 300 units equates to an overall density of 5.7 du /ac, however, the majority of the units are contained within the multi - family buildings located on the western portion of the site closest to Market Street /US 17. 21.2 acres ... 62 units 2.9 du/ac `�� `•►� � t,°e` �, air �C�p'!�i �A�I'Cr3�lI�: �7rWjv _ �' I e 77 The applicant's proposed conceptual plan shows a transition of housing types from multi- family on the western portion of the site to duplex and then single - family on the east end of the site. This transiting development pattern is similar to the Marsh Oaks area, located to the south along Market Street, which transitions from commercial /multi- family development (Aldi, Amberleigh Shores) to townhomes, and then single - family housing. A similar example in the City of Wilmington is Fairfield Park located along Carolina Beach Road. However, in both of these examples, the more intense development has direct access to an arterial road. The proposed multi - family housing, and the majority of the units for the project, are located closer to the Porters Neck commercial node. This node is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as one of three Growth Nodes in the County. Growth Nodes are intended to be focus areas of development, encouraging high- density development that promotes alternative transportation options. The intent is to cluster growth in these areas so that public transportation connections can be accomplished. The boundaries of these nodes are not site specific and are intended to be a general representation of the area. The Porters Neck community is the major commercial node of the northern portion of the County, containing big box retailers (Wal -Mart and Lowes), grocery stores (Harris Teeter and Food Lion), restaurants (Cast Iron Kitchen, Slice of Life, Buffalo Wild Wings, etc.), and medical offices (Wilmington Health, Medac). However, other than a gas station /convenience store, the existing commercial development in this node is primarily located west of Market Street or south of Porters Neck Road on the east side of Market Street. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 5 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 5 Porters Neck Node 0 ►� General Boundary of the �e Porters Neck Growth Node as shown in the Comprehensive Plan r 7. - • °- °- --^TM•x \., 0 Subject _ MEDAL EON site or � � R �qa r� Harri <_ — 'Tsetse Zoning Districts . kircue� s �. ,,fir B -1 L 1 -1 - B -2 L 0 &1 sX n, CUD B -1 R -10 > iOCUD B -2 R -15 WILMI e.. HEALNFGTON V B -✓4 ® CZD B-1 R-20 JS 60, B TRANSPORTATION • The site is accessed by "Old" Market Street and Shiraz Way, both of which are maintained by NCDOT. In addition, roadway connections will be made to existing road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision, however, the applicant is proposing to gate these connections and limit access to emergency vehicles only. • The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 58 single - family homes and 348 multi - family units on the subject property (406 total units — which exceeds the proposed 300 units). A development of this scale is estimated by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) to generate about 200 trips in the AM peak hour and 240 trips in the PM peak hour. • As currently zoned, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 124 single - family homes under the performance residential standards. A detached single - family dwelling typically generates about one trip during the PM peak hours. Therefore, the property could currently generate approximately 124 trips during the PM peak hours. The proposed development, as modified to reflect the 300 total units, is estimated to increase the number of trips by 65 in the AM peak and 70 in the PM peak. Site Trip Distribution • The TIA estimates that distribution of traffic to and from the site will be split 5050 with half of the trips utilizing Shiraz Way and half utilizing "Old" Market Street. This distribution was proposed by the applicant and approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 6 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 6 Vehicle Trip Distribution at Notable Intersections During the Peak Hours * Number values below indicate the number of estimated vehicular trips generated by the proposed development (based on the current proposal of 300 units) in the AM and PM peak hours. Red Arrows = Trips 1. US 17 at Futch Creek Road/ "Old" SL ,, Exiting the Site �Pls'vP c� �Oo a .4 ' � P• Area Map x 58 PM Right on Porters Neck Road i 2_ Market Street At Porters Neck Road Blue Arrows = Trips Entering the Site x 7 AM 24 PM 4 b Through to U5 17 x 21 PM {/ U -Turn 8; x 24 AM Through 14 PM Through to z 11 AM� Hampstead = 36 PM Right to -' 7 AM Futch Creek 24 PM Road Left to Futch r Creek Road 61 AM 36 PM Right on US 17 7. US 17 at Futch Creek Roar! 3_ Porters Neck RoundaboutlSite Access Source: Applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (Ramey Kemp & Associates) Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 7 Page 7 of 18 Level of Service • The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable intersections in the area including the following: • Porters Neck Road at Edgewater Club Road /Shiraz Way (roundabout) • Market Street at Porters Neck Road • Futch Creek Road /Market Street at US 17 • US 17 at U -turn Location (north of Futch Creek Road). • Below is the LOS of the intersections described in the TIA. The data provides the overall LOS of the intersection, and was updated by the applicant's traffic engineer to reflect the conceptual plan presented at the Planning Board meeting that included 324 units. The current plan has 24 fewer units. The reduction is expected to slightly reduce the delays. • The TIA, based on the original 406 total units, also provides data on all intersection movements (left turn, right turn, through movement, etc.). There are some current and future movements with a F LOS located at the intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street. These movements generally consist of the left turns and traffic crossing Market Street. The TIA indicated the proposed development will increase the delay of one of these movements (the westbound left on Porters Neck). • The TIA did not include the impact of the improvements from the Military Cutoff extension project currently under construction. That project is expected to be completed around the proposed build out date for the requested development (late 2022/early 2023). Porters Neck Road at Edgewater Scenario 6MME Club Road/Shiraz Way Overall LOS 1 A (roundabout) Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing A 8 2023 Future A 9 2023 Future with Project Alw� L 2019 Existing A PM PEAK A 10 7 2023 Future A 8 2023 Future with Project A 9 Market Street Scenario and Porters Neck Road Overall LOS Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing D 41 2023 Future D 43 2023 Future with Project D 45 FAMMIT, M, 2019 Existing D 44 2023 Future D 47 2023 Future with Project D 48 Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 8 Page 8 of 18 US 17 at Market Scenario Street/Futch Creek Overall LOS ... Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing B 18 2023 Future B 20 2023 Future with Project C 24 2019 Existing C 33 2023 Future C 31 2023 Future with Project D 37 US 17 at U-Turn Scenario (North of Futch Creek Road) Overall LOS Delay in Seconds 2019 Existing C 22 2023 Future C 26 2023 Future with Project C ViVAN . , 31 2019 Existing A 9 2023 Future B 10 2023 Future with Project B 13 Required or Proposed Improvements • The TIA has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The notable roadway improvements required include the installation of a second right turn lane on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. The application is also proposing to add this improvement as a condition on the development. Notable Roadway Improvement: r r =• Installation of a Second Right -Turn Lane to Create Dural Rights NIP • Futch Creek kf s Road market Street Z1 9 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Page 9 of 18 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 9 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Report • The residents of Vineyard Planation recently commissioned a Traffic Calming Assessment due to speeding concerns in their neighborhood. The assessment, which was prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., examined certain roads in the neighborhood and made the following findings: Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data • The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but not limited to: • Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue; • Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery Way; and Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 18 F— Location Riesling Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 a 1ph 85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds above 35 mph 32 mph 4.4 Average Daily Traffic 1,344 Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way 25 mph 29 mph <0,1 412 Chablis Way west of ladewood Drive. 25 mph 24 mph 0.1 424 Winery Way 25 mph 29 mph 2.5 412 • The assessment made recommendations to help reduce speeding in the area including but not limited to: • Installing speed humps on Riesling Avenue; • Using portable speed feedback signs on Riesling Avenue, Chablis Way, and Winery Way; and Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 18 o Using speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. • NCDOT has reviewed the assessment and provided comments. The HOA can proceed with installing the recommended speed humps on Riesling Avenue pending receiving an encroachment agreement with NCDOT. Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 11 Page 11 of 18 • STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension). • Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1-140. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project. • STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median) • Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5- foot sidewalk on the western side of the street. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • NCDOT Proiect — Installation of an Additional Southbound Exit Lane on US -17 onto Market Street o The Board of Commissioners recently adopted a resolution to support the installation of an additional southbound exit lane at the US 17 /Market Street Interchange. The project is a candidate for funding through the State's High Impact Low Cost program. o While funding for this program is currently on hold due to NCDOT' s cash flow balance, NCDOT Division 3 has been requested to submit everything needed for the fund requests to the Board of Transportation so there is no delay when funding becomes available. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status • 132,000 sf Office • 18,000 sf Medical Office • Approved August 5, 2019 1. Scotts Hill Medical • 32,000 sf Shopping • Phase 1 & 2: 2020 Build Out Park Center Year • 9,000 sf Pharmacy with • Full Build 2022 Drive - Through The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a northbound U -turn lane on US 17 south of Scott Hill Loop Road. • Installation of a southbound left turn lane on US 17 at Scoots Hill Medical Drive. • Installation of a northbound right turn lane, removal of the barrier from the southbound left turn lane, and signalization of the intersection on US 17 at the site's southern access point. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 12 Page 12 of 18 • Scotts Hill Village • Coastal Prep Academy Development Status: Phase 1 of the medical park has been platted consisting of 3 lots. Currently, one office building is being constructed. No roadway improvements have been completed at this time. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Waterstone • 151 Single - Family • Approved June 18, 2015 Dwellings • 2020 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a southbound right turn lane on Edgewater Club Road at the site's northern access. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Porters Neck Elementary Development Status: 98 lots have been platted at this time. The right turn lane has been installed. SCHOOLS • Students generated from this development would be assigned to Porters Neck Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. • One hundred twenty -four (1 24) dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -20 and R -15 zoning base density, and 300 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 176 dwelling units. • Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.1 1 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 42.2 (18.9 elementary, 9.6 middle, and 13.7 high) more students than if developed under existing zoning. *Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes students attending out -of- district specialty schools, such as year -round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTECH. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 13 Page 13 of 18 School Enrollment* and Capacity * * - 2020 -2021 Estimates *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class II (moderate limitation) and Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 14 Page 14 of 18 Total Enrollment of Capacity of % of Funded Level NHC % School Assigned Assigned Capacity of Capacity Capacity School School w/ Assigned Upgrades Portables School Elementary 97% Porters Neck 475 552 86% None Middle 107% Holly Shelter 917 934 98% None High 105% Laney 2063 1903 108% None *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class II (moderate limitation) and Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 14 Page 14 of 18 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 15 Page 15 of 18 General Residential & Community Mixed Use located partially within Porters Neck Growth Node. The subject parcel is primarily General Residential, with roughly 20% Future Land Use designated as Community Mixed Use. Map Place Type Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed with either place type, allowing site - specific features and evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered. General Residential: Focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family Place Type residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. Description Community Mixed Use: Focus on small - scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi - family and single - family residential. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 15 Page 15 of 18 Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 18 The proposed RMF -L development is located between existing lower density residential neighborhoods and the Old Market St. corridor at the edge of the Porters Neck Growth Node. This growth node is one of the areas identified as where growth should be clustered and high- density developments encouraged. In general, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along roadways for higher residential densities and a mix of uses and those near existing neighborhoods as General Residential in order to allow for an orderly transition of densities and intensities. The proposed RMF -L zoning, one of the new zoning tools adopted in July 2019 to provide for the development patterns outlined in the Analysis Comprehensive Plan, would provide a transition in density and intensity between future Community Mixed Use development along Old Market Street and the existing single family residential districts on either side of the subject site. Providing options for alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached development is one of the stated intents for this district. The overall project density of 5.7 units per acre is generally consistent with the 6 dwelling units per acre characteristic of the General Residential place type. The majority of that density is proposed for the western portion of the site closest to the growth node and Community Mixed Use areas which promotes densities up to 15 dwelling units per acre. The density of the duplex and single - family detached portion of the project prosed for the eastern side is closer to 3 dwelling units per acre. The proposed RMF -L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because this zoning district is intended to provide alternative housing types in direct relationship to single - family detached Consistency development, the overall project density is in -line with those characteristic Recommendation of General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types, the highest density portion of the project is located on the western end of the site which is part of the Porters Neck Growth Node and designated as Community Mixed Use, and the proposed development pattern provides for the orderly transition of densities and intensities. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 16 Page 16 of 18 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, numerous residents attended in opposition to the request. Representatives of the opposition presented concerns including those relating to traffic, schools, stormwater, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application (5 -0), finding it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. The Board also found their approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. 4. A gate must be installed between the proposed multi - family section of the project and the duplex housing preventing eastbound travel from the apartments and only allowing westbound travel for residents of the duplex and single - family housing in the development. Emergency vehicles would be able to go in either direction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Overall the project is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan because it contributes to providing a mix of housing options in the area, provides for the orderly transition of uses, and the overall project density is in -line with those recommended in the General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types. As the unique location of the site does not have direct access to an arterial street, it is anticipated the development will increase traffic near established single - family neighborhoods. However, the review of the TIA, which studied the impact from 406 dwelling units (exceeding the 300 units proposed) indicates that the overall Level of Service of the major intersections in the area will operate at an acceptable level when the proposed development is expected to be completed in 2023. The applicant is also proposing to design the stormwater facilities to accommodate the 100 -year storm event, which exceeds the County's requirement of designing to the 25 -year storm event. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 17 Page 17 of 18 Staff recommends approval of the application. After the Planning Board meeting, further discussion with the applicant and community representatives opposing the application indicated both parties prefer the removal of condition #4 requiring a gate in the middle of the project because it is likely to reduce travel options resulting in traffic concentrating on fewer roads in the area. Staff recommends this condition be removed due to this concern. Example Motion of Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because, although it will increase traffic in the area, the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing options. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1. The project's stormwater facilities must be designed to accommodate a 100 -year storm event. 2. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an additional westbound right turn lane shall be installed on Futch Creek Road /Market Street at its intersection with US 17. Installation of the turn lane requires approval from NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT's standards. 3. The roadway connections to the three road stubs abutting the site to the north in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision shall be gated and limit access to emergency vehicles only. Example Motion of Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF -L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of uses from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, provides for a range of housing types, and is in -line with the recommended densities of the Community Mixed Use and General Residential place types, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z19 -14 Staff Report BOC 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 18 Page 18 of 18 North Carolina Coastal Federation Working Together for a Healthy Coast April 8, 2020 New Hanover County Board of Commissioners 230 Government Center Drive Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Correction to January 29 Letter regarding Rezoning Request (Z1.9 -142 — Request by Logan Developers, Inc. on behalf of the property owners, Murray, Spradley, Foy, et al, to rezone approximately 52.39 acres of land located near the 8300 block of "Old" Market Street and the 8300 block of Shiraz Way, from R -15 and R -20, Residential Districts, to (CZD) RMF -L, Conditional Residential Multi - Family Low Density District, in order to construct a residential development consisting of multi family, duplex, and single family housing. Dear Commissioners, On behalf of the North Carolina Coastal Federation, we need to correct information presented in our January 29 letter regarding this requested rezoning. In keeping with our organizational mission, our input on this rezoning request relates to stormwater management and water quality. While as a Board we understand you have discretion to consider a wide range of issues raised by the community in making your decision on this application, please note that this letter is focused only on the quality of our coastal waters. Regarding water quality and this proposed rezoning, we did not approach the applicant prior to submitting our previous letter to discuss whether or not their proposal would result in more polluted runoff to coastal waters. We have now talked with the applicant, and they have assured us that the density of development allowed by the current zoning is materially the same as what will be built if the property is rezoned as they request. Assuming that your county planning staff concurs with this finding, then it would be our conclusion that the differences in zoning make no difference in terms of the volume and rate of stormwater that eventually reaches Pages Creek. Please accept corrections to our previous letter. They included: 1. We now understand that if there is a condition on the rezoning that requires the applicant to design their county mandated stormwater system to accommodate a 24 hour /100 -year storm event, county rules require that system to accommodate 10 inches of precipitation, not 12.6 inches as stated in our letter. The higher number we used in Northeast Region Headquarters & Central Region Southeast Region 637 Harbor Road, P.O. Box 276 3609 N.C. 24 • Newport, NC 28570 309 W. Salisbury Street W 2.473. e, NC 27981 Board of Corr,�I�M 5 d1 ne 1, 2020 Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 252,473.1607 _I "�. or 910.509.2838 North Carolina Coastal Federation our previous letter is from the NOAA Flood Atlas which is not referenced or used by the county ordinance. 2. The project whether constructed under the existing or proposed zoning must comply with the state's Coastal Stormwater Program. There is no requirement in that program that projects built within one -half mile of waters classified as SA be constructed as "low - density (12% or less built upon area)." All applicants have the option of exceeding 12% if they meet the design requirements for high density projects in the state rules. Our letter was clearly wrong in asserting that the applicant must build to the low-density standard and we want to correct that misinformation. 3. We would still prefer to seethe project's stormwater system designed to meet state rules using the option for volume matching (15A NCAC 02H .1003 (44) "Runoff volume match ") if such a design approach is feasible and cost- effective. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this letter. Thank you for your work on behalf of all the citizens of New Hanover County. Sincerely, Todd Miller Executive Director .tom *_rV Kerri Allen Coastal Advocate Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 3 - 2 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N 11 G 6) 1 � R -7` � kN 1 -14fl 0 t_14Q ,�ys ski ` Q 8422 1021 81205 IVDJNGO q� •B;Z 191 •8414 213 ��O �' B -1 • 8390 16 2 `Z / -a �Q OQ` •h� • Site 83x0 8839 8410 2 3� 088437 ��� 836± 8370 \ '`408 412 - �8350 N 8408 8406/ 195 `8405401 84 /1' 4'4 O&I • 8311 83421 8409 409 417 434 �O 'Q I -1 8312 8320 • 418 8417 w R -15 • 8376 4`14 425 429 8418 <201 • `43o�tTc8410 205 �20 207 \6 454\ Subject Site •� 2176213 301 8402 8406 (6 2 y�4P CF((4R- 400 22 604 / 217 �• 404 i6 0 606• (� 1305 0 • 412,. 14 1<V1 « 612 �'� Cy C / J` O 221 (� 421 w 1 116; 1,000 3/17 • �! 416 • 618/ 25 629 •f��\ TG �k �/ • � • 408 • ',R� +� %626a/ 702/620. q RU 313 32.1 420 - 622,Z(633 • �424/•�V99\ �.l 641 �7� 0 '1'\N 401 428 500\ % 8356 `6 � /637 � 718 • 634 -1IV 705 -_722 417/ 504 /501\ X642 �645�701726 i ' 5 X702 �' *717*>\-730 42 A[� 50 ��515 713 0717 acs Ay Vq a �`50�• 508 4,516,1519 � 7067 �•�7.18� 25 • 73 aP Cy9� X524 `601'605 , 4�\7 114/8 41.1 • 8 10 513* 517 ,� �i 13 722 726► 8403 w / 521 06014 �a609�615 730 •!> 8406 4�11aG 1 fOfVIE RD _ �l f • 608 �• 6112 8402 X605 • / �' ,� 71,57• 738• \n /2$��b X011 705 • 801. • 746 I 617 • 8313 985 Q F 609 701 • • • 714 < <F 04' O 713 [ 4. 725 1009 • 1009 i 4'!p Otr 0 , 719 0010 099 08310 aRF6, 722 805 $1,7 1007 1013 1013 Ali 71! 802 • i 804 102 97 / • 101013 Q 8257 8253 8269 �s 101 8241 • 18281'8277 Al2 602 05 8249' q� q�p. Q 8229 0624* 71 q0 �8221i !8232 64010 1624 �12�t�ypR w$1 8213.644r636 632 � ��` ,��hNwkl. / PORtERS•NFCk 0- 8217.652 109 113 ct`�y, 1P OQp R L Qom' 104 '1 dN 117 Feet Parcels withir$��f�io i loners - 2e Parcels iz1 M: 13-4 116 fi r C m S Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N �� 1 W Ills ♦�1DJNG �!p NY MAP ww�w�w• iii ♦i'! !i!!�i ♦i ♦mow+► R �°4� -�� ��Q �p�` p. w�w� CUDtB�r2'yw�w�♦ �s yNAY �r9 � 1 �`N� �1"Ov w,►5w 96 i ♦w�ww ty hj� www ♦iPwwiwiwiwiwiw � Q- '�o. `' wwi1�i� ♦�wwi ♦ ♦���ww �� � p ��� o ♦ �����' , `� �QU .Q WILD DUNES;CIK CZri. B -2 : u° Subject Site 1 -1 s: 1 Imo, 1,000 /'TIC C `���- �''��R ,�F�y ? ao 2Q —Water CUD O &I ✓F Sewer v ,4a� 4Q'V Zoning Districts Lu 111-15 A -1 EDZD PD R -20S SC Q� F, AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7 4. B -1 1 -2 R -15 RA B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Feet o loners - 1, 020 Incorporated Areas � � SHOD t_ t r _ M: 13- 5 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z19 -14 8300 block R -15 & R -20/ Residential Development/ Old Market St Single - Family & Agriculture RMF -L N AMIXE 1,000 /COMMUNITY MIXED USE Feet i r m Subject Site dioners M: 13- 6 GENERAL/ RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION IL N�,,yo Place Types COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE ��w �A k COMMUNITY MIXED USE CSR ��� \ \\ RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 7 - 1 I 'E " T 'u? " '� i r r t'. iii„ E DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 1 10 i Wilmington, North Carolina 1 Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (910) 798 -7053 plan ningdevelopment.nhcg ov.com CONDITIONAL LOAN DISTRICT. Application Applicant /Agent Information Property Owner(s) If different than Applicant /Agent Name Owner Name Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached Company Owner Name 2 Logan Developers, Inc. Address Address 60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1 City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Belville, NC 28451 Phone Phone 91 0.452.7175 Email Email asmith @loganhomes.com Subject Property information Address /Location See Attached Parcel Identification Number(s) See Attached Total Parcel(s) Acreage 52.39 ac Existing Zoning and Use(s) See Attached Future Land Use Classification Community Mixed Use and General Residential Application Only) Case Number Date/Time received: Received by: Z.l,l - / q `v <o 19 Page 3 of 7 Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 202 ITEM: 13- 8 - 1 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District. RMF -L Total Acreage of Proposed District. ±5239 ac Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). See Attached Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 4 of 7 ITEM: 13 -(PDO Tonal Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip GenerationManuoi. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. iTE Land Use: See Report Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): _ AM Peak Flour Trips: _ _ PM Peak Hour Trips: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistentwith the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, c an create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) See Attached -- - — -- 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 5 of 7 ITEM: 1348— �itional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/20T 7 APPLICATIO N REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial'. If an item is not applicable, mark as "NIA ". Applications must be complete in order to process for further review. Required Information Applicant Staff Initial Initial 1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application. a 5 2 Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review). �5 3 Community meeting written summary. 4 Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). �5 5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page reference of the property requested for rezoning. 6 Site Plan including the following elements: * Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non- residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. Development schedule including proposed phasing. Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets �7 and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. I� All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. ® The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance. Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change Ref. Article VII as applicable). 7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan. t�s 8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. g Page 6 of 7 Conditional Zonin District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 202 ITEM: 13- 8 - 4 By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. i understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Acton my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. Signature of Property Owner(s) �//( 4, Signatur o Appli a gent Print Name(s) A40126�/ Print Name NOTE, Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. �'oNTY:'� •f. , \," p n Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Page 7 of 7 ITEM: 13 -Qm itional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING & LAND USE o Wi a AUTHORITY FOR Fri ®usartni" APPOINTMENT OF AGENT Print Farm 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 2843 910 -798 -7165 phone 910 -798 -7053 fax www.nhegov.com Please note that for quasi - judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property Name Owner Name Address Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached Subject Property Owners See Attached Company Owner Name 2 City, State, Zip Logan Developers, Inc. See Attached See Attached Address Address Parcel ID 60 Gregory Rd, Suite 1 See Attached See Attached City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Belville, NC 28451 See Attached Phone Phone 910.452.7175 See Attached Email Email asmith@loganhomes.com ApplicationTracking Information See Attached (Staff 0111v) Case Number Reference: Uate/Time received: Received bv: 10 This document was willfully executed on the day of October �0 19 Owner 1 Signature Owner 2 Signature 09114 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E R I M G, I N C. Porters Oaks Conditional Rezoning Application Subject Property Owners PIN: R02900- 004 - 007 -000 Book / Page: 1611/1259 Property Address: 8390 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.22 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley as the heirs of Robert C Jr & Emma Murray Phone: DocuSigned by: F Phone: Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS.. Robe zt%&jrr)y96blJrt... Email: DocuSigned by: A4 Ulrike . rz yF6avuse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: Sandra lsd§64az... PIN: R02900- 004 - 008 -000 Book / Page: 9906/1103 Property Address: 8370 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.92 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Ben G. Murray Jr., married as the sole heir of Ben G Murray Phone: DocuSigned by: Ben G.. T 9dico61c4AS.. by: Email: FDocuSig"ed Joyce A. ra4b&aQUf�eA @.f. Ben G. Murray, Jr. PIN: R02900- 004 - 019 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8370 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.29 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley 1 2 2 ❑ I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M 1 N G T ❑ N, N ❑ 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 7 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PIN: DocuSigned by: Phone: 5558/0221 Property Address: Ro 111 Email: DocuSigned by: Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley UI #�YWAWPfFspouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by- Phone: DocuSigned by: — San 3.K.Osrrz y PIN: R02900- 004 - 009 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8376 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 14.30 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 101 - Agricultural Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley DocuSigned by: F Phone: Ro 2L"PfMMTW,1llll Email: DocuSigned by: Ulr KDIVIE4FtKtpouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: /I ' Al/A. v^ Pra j( -(-14 Sa 3kb&pta &.y PIN: R03700- 001 - 007 -000 Book / Page: 5558/0221 Property Address: 8380 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 11.69 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District / 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Robert C. Murray, III, married and Sandra M. Spradley DocuSigned by- Phone: Rob .1Wruga,2flll Email: DocuSigned by: Ulrik oMwd'oam-fi (rouse of Robert C. Murray, IIII DocuSigned by: Sand 3-6- "lie8WA82... PIN: R03700- 001 - 006 -000 Book / Page: 1592/1390 Property Address: 8313 Shiraz Way, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 1.07 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 8 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 Property Owner: Robert C Murray III and wife Ulrike H. Murray DocuSigned by: Phone: Email: DocuSigned by: U I kdo *Auga m'F... PIN: R02900- 004 - 010 -000 Book / Page: 9905/1807 Property Address: 421 Tibby's Drive, Wilmington INC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 12.86 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and Antonia M Foy Life Estate 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 9 DocuSigned by: Phone: tilt ISS A�foad6���s Email: DocuSigned by: E;6tvu wusS iw @AsV.. DocuSigned by: SOgW,& i�uSS 9409 fo6y by Sognia F. Weiss her Attorney in Fact PIN: R02900- 004 - 010 -001 Book / Page: 9905/1807 Property Address: 8362 Market Street, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 0.73 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: Sognia F. Weiss and husband Steven Weiss and Antonia M Foy Life Estate Phone: DocuSigned by: &41- (bliss Email: i�lf9dtsld�ES$ DocuSigned by: E;hMt'V' UA-SS (w wN�V... DocuSigned/ by: s�c�Bs6�sy. by Sognia F. Weiss her Attorney in Fact 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 9 DocuSign Envelope ID: B752171E- 36CC- 41A7- B4E3- D7A0129A2545 PIN: R03700- 001 - 003 -000 Book / Page: 5801/1623 Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 3.32 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -15 Residential District/ 958 - Unused Land Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company DocuSigned by: Phone: FiL E! d err-.•L Jr. B "(Prwd8 Tuurray, Jr., Member and General Manager Email: PIN: R03700- 001 - 002 -000 Book / Page: 5801/1623 Property Address: 817 Porters Neck Road, Wilmington NC 28411 Parcel Acreage: 6.97 ac Existing Zoning & Use: R -20 Residential District / 10 -1 Family Residential Property Owner: BLTD Properties LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company DocuSigned by: Phone: JL E1 d urr.,• Jr. By mfdoQfdchLarray, Jr., Member and General Manager Email: 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 6 4 3 P H ( 9 1 D ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 10 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upol ti id: N 1 =T--i - -r 18, 2019 Date: October 10, 2019 Project Narrative - The Oaks at Murray Farm: The proposed development is located between Old Market Street, Shiraz Way, and Tibby's Drive and is comprised of the following parcels totaling +52.39 acres: R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 The zoning of the parcels is R -15 in the middle to northwest portion of the tract, the portion fronting Old Market Street. The rear of the property is zoned R -20. The NHC Future Land Use Plan identifies the front third of the site as community mixed use and the rear as general residential. This area east /southeast of Market Street is identified as a growth node with an emphasis on commercial and dense residential uses. The rear of the site is slated as general residential and transitions from the growth node into the neighborhood fabric of the Porters Neck area. In keeping with the split land uses, we present a project with apartments near Market Street in the growth node and transition into the duplexes and single family more aligned with general residential. To create this cohesively designed mixture of product types on the subject parcels, we respectfully request the property be conditionally rezoned to the RMF -L Residential Multi- family Low Density). This proposed zoning district is one of the new districts recently approved to offer better, more site specific development options. This RMF -L zone allows us to provide a mixture of product types integrated into common open space, landscape, and other improvements that make a project feel like it is blended and well thought -out. Part of the charm of this property is the large trees as seen from Market Street. Our plan proposes saving as many of those large trees as possible to set the most dense portion of our plan, the apartments, into a tree canopy. This unique setting allows us to preserve the character of the site and neighborhood while transitioning down to a traditional single - family neighborhood. The majority of the land is or has been used as farm land and provides a good, open area in the rear of the property as is required for the single family homesites proposed. The applicant, Logan Developers, Inc. presents this project request to you as one that is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Future Land Use plan and as a project, that we feel, honors the natural site characteristics while acting as a transition project to the surrounding townhomes, duplexes, and single family homes in the vicinity of this project. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 11 Page 2 of 2 During the process, the development team has listened to concerns and comments form residents within the Porters Neck community. We have made many changes, best summarized in the community meeting summary, and attempted to compromise with the neighbors to alleviate traffic and stormwater concerns and limit density beyond the initial plans. We recognize this is a project that infills one of the last undeveloped properties in the Porters Neck area, and we also understand the comments from neighbors to keep the current community as it is now. However, our development team strongly feels this is a project worthy of fitting into the Porters Neck community. We present this project for the consideration of planning staff and New Hanover County Boards to determine if this project is a suitable conditional rezoning for an area of the County noted as community mixed use /general residential and as a growth node as indicated by the County's adopted Future Land Use Plan, as a project cohesively designed as a transition from higher density, commercial corridor of Market Street back to the traditional single family neighborhoods of Porters Neck. Thank you for your consideration of the conditional rezoning request. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 12 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upol ID: D ❑m❑ ❑ ❑r 13, 2019 Upol tl I: N❑ELI❑ ❑ ❑r 18, 2019 Date: October 10, 2019 Updated Submittal 12/13/19: The updated submittal reduces overall density on the site from the original 406 units down to 324 (228 apartments, 34 duplex, 62 single family). This reduces the proposed density from 7.75 units /acre to 6.18 units /acre. We discussed options for plan alterations with those willing to discuss changes to the plan. A certain portion of the community was willing entertain a proposal that pulled apartments further away from the Vineyard Plantation homes and removed the third floor of the apartments. The newly revised plan does just that —takes 6 of the 12 apartment buildings down to 2 stories and leaves 3 story buildings only in the areas adjacent to vacant land. We received one request to move the pool and clubhouse away from nearby homes, so we also accommodated this by pulling it into open space areas more internally located than on the edge near existing homes. We also reduced the overall apartment count from the most recent proposal of 288 to the current proposal of 228 units (a drop of 60units). We also added both dedicated open space and undeveloped or landscape areas. The applicant's previously proposed conditions remain current in this proposal. We recognize that we cannot make every neighbor happy with this proposal, but we are presenting this plan in a good -faith effort to respond to and compromise with the community. We respectfully submit this plan to you for consideration of the conditional rezoning as presented in the plans and associated documents. Previously Submitted Information: The Oaks at Murrav Farm Conditional Zoning Suaalemental Information Proposed Conditions: Beyond the existing requirements of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance, the proposed for the initial 10/10/19 submittal mixed residential project proposes to save many of the large character trees in an effort to both preserve the site's character and to help buffer the larger apartment buildings on site. In addition, the applicant proposing pulling most buildings away from property lines to further buffer the proposed development from the neighboring properties. The updated conditions proposed for the conditional rezoning are as follows and as a direct result of community meeting concerns: 1. Revise stormwater design to achieve 100 year storm instead of meeting the minimum 25 year storm. This is achievable in part because of the excellent soils data obtained since the first community meeting and in part because the wetland area of the site was not nearly as much land area once an on -site analysis was completed. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 13 Page 2 of 3 2. To alleviate traffic concerns, the applicant proposes to design and construct an additional right turn lane at Futch Creek Road. and Hwy 17 /Market intersection if NCDOT /WMPO allow this measure to be completed. After our traffic consultant ran various scenarios at all intersection near the project site, the improvement that made the most impact was this intersection. The current understanding is that the Futch Creek traffic light queuing will be cut nearly in half by addition of a right turn lane. The design will have to be coordinated with the two entities to assure initial design meets their future plans and does not conflict with their understanding of the movement through the intersection. As such, the applicant proposes to pursue this right turn lane improvement with all the necessary decision makers including the County, WMPO, and NCDOT. Consideration of a Conditional Zoning District - Criteria: 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? The subject property is located in a growth node just off of Market Street, in an area slated for intensive development such as shopping centers and commercial services. The design of the project proposes placing the most intensive use, the apartments, near the front of the site and in the growth node area. This type of use will be most intense, but the design also promotes another policy to conserve natural resources, such as the large trees designated to be saved at the front of the site. The single family and duplex portions of the design are in keeping with the existing fabric of the neighborhood and align with the Future Land Use Plan. 2. How would the requested conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? As mentioned above, the requested zoning and layout of the design nicely aligns with the Future Land Use Map. The apartments end nearly right on top of the division of Community Mixed Use, an acceptable use for this designation, and the single family and duplexes fall within the general residential designated portion of the site. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? The existing zoning reflects a less intensive land use than Future Land Use Plan projects for this commercial corridor along Market Street. The proposed single family and duplex areas are allowable under the existing zonings as performance residential; however the rezoning to RMF -L allows apartments and more intensive mixed use residential projects to be constructed whereas the current zoning does not. This project does propose higher than the 2.5 units / acre allowed by the by -right performance residential. Our proposed 7.4 units to the acre places the bulk of that density in the apartments, the area of the site slated for community mixed -use. While the proposed zoning district allows for 10 units to the acre, it is really the combination of higher density and mixture of uses that allows the project to be Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 14 Page 3 of 3 built in keeping with the County's plans for this region of the County. RMF -L allows the project to blend a mixture of residential housing types that specifically fit the Future Land Use Plan in this area of the County. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 15 JC MORGAN REAL ESIAIE VALUXI ION I REVIEW I CONSULTING:; December 1, 2019 New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive - Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Rezoning; Conditional Zoning District Case Number Z19 -14 Logan Developers, Inc. 52.39 Acres; The Oaks at Murray Farm (Proposed) New Hanover County, NC JC Morgan Company is a real estate appraisal and consulting firm in Wilmington, NC. Since 2010, our firm has appraised and consulted on hundreds of properties in and around the Wilmington area. The property types we appraise and provide consulting services for include residential, land, retail, office, industrial, subdivisions and mixed -use. Our client base consists of real estate owners, developers, financial institutions, local and federal governments and related agencies, attorneys, utility companies and airport authorities. I was recently engaged by the applicant to perform research and analysis that would enable me to conclude an opinion of whether the proposed project would have any impact on the adjacent and surrounding properties. As I understand it, The Oaks at Murray Farm is a proposed residential development to be located on 52.39 acres in the Porters Neck area of New Hanover County. The development will contain single family residences on the east end of the project, duplex style residential properties located in the middle section of the development and luxury garden style residential apartments on the west side of the project. The development appears to meet or exceed market standards for overall design, buffers, aesthetics and product pricing. As the immediate area already consists of small lot SFR residential development, duplex -style residential development and traditional SFR residential development, the project's proposed single family development (east side of the project) and the duplex style residential dwellings (middle section of the project) are considered to be consistent with existing land uses in the immediate area and will have no negative impact on adjacent or surrounding property values. In fact, the market prices of the proposed single family and duplex style residential dwellings will likely be higher than many of the surrounding property values, potentially increasing the average market value of homes in the area. This trend of new home product pricing extending beyond the values of the existing housing stock in the immediate area remains consistent throughout New Hanover and surrounding counties. Lumina Station 1904 Easm,00d Road - Suite 305 - Wilmington, NC • 28403 PO Box 481 • lVrightss -ille Beach. NC • 6;,480 Tel: 910 - 256 -2920 • Fax: 888 - 819 -8258 www.jcmorganco.com Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 16 The west side of the proposed project will consist of a luxury garden style residential apartment complex. As with most newly developed apartment communities in their respective markets, the proposed apartments should command some of the highest rents in the sub - market, attracting tenants with higher income levels and those who 'lease by choice'. To develop an opinion as to whether the proposed apartments would have any Impact on adjacentor surrounding property values, I have taken the following steps: 1. I performed a review of several apartment communities in the Wilmington market, and more particularly in the property's immediate sub - market, to determine the impact, if any, these apartment communities had on adjacent and surrounding property values, Some of the communities I reviewed included: • Amberleigh Shores • Hawthorne at the Station /Lucia Point • Headwaters at Autumn Hall • Tesla Park • St. Andrews Place, Reserve • Bellingham Park (Condominiums) Whenever the data allowed, I compared SFR properties that abutted the apartment communities to SFR properties that did not, to determine if there was any quantifiable impact on property values. In several cases, over 10 years of data was reviewed. During my research, I found no indication that the properties abutting the adjacent apartment communities had any impact (positive of negative) on value. 2. Discussions with market participants is a common method to get a feel of how the market perceives various issues. For this assignment, I spoke with several market participants about the impact the proposed development could have on the adjoining or surrounding properties. I spoke with several market participants active in the local real estate market (residential real estate brokers and appraisers). All indicated that the proposed project would likely have no impact on the real estate values of adjoining or surrounding properties. In fact, several indicated that a SFR dwelling that backs up to an adequate buffer of a luxury apartment community would be preferable to one backing up to another SFR dwelling. Summary Based on my research and review of market sales data, I found no evidence that the proposed project would have any negative impact on the property values of the adjacent or surrounding properties Furthermore, due to the growth of the immediate area over the past several years, which includes apartment communities, hotels, new retail centers, restaurants and increasing residential densities, the property is considered an infill site. Within the market area, comparable infill sites have been developed with mixed uses, generally consisting of commercial or multi - family land uses located at the front of the development and single - family land uses located at the rear of the developments. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 17 This transition of land uses is preferred by New Hanover County, as noted in the NHC Future Land Use Plan, as well as other municipalities in North Carolina. The proposed project is consistent with the recommended uses of the Community .'Aired Use place type and is consistent with current and preferred development trends for comparable locations. Should you have any questions, or want to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, = 1� == Jack C. (Cal) Morgan, III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS JC Morgan Company Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 18 PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. October 11, 2019 19305.PE Various Parcels in Porters Neck New Hanover County, North Carolin 60 Gregory Rd., Suite 1 Belville, NC 28451 ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being various tracts or parcels of land in Harnett Township, New Hanover County, North Carolina, being located on the southeastern side of Market street and U.S. Highway 17 consisting of New Hanover County tax records parcels R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 -007- 000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 -003 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, and R02900- 004 - 019 -000 being more particularly described as follows. Point of beginning being the northern most corner of R02900- 004 - 007 -000, 8390 Market street on the southern margin of Market street thence South 49 °15'00" East a distance of 160.00' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street South 48 °52'51" East a distance of 112.94' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R02900- 004 - 009 -000 8376 Market street the following five (5) course and distances; South 48 °34'30" East a distance of 645.43' to a point; South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 551.15' to a point; South 48 °30'15" East a distance of 505.00' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 453.92' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 100.00' to a point; Thence with the northern boundary of R03700- 001 - 007 -000 8380 Market street the following six (6) course and distances; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 612.12' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 192.62' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 434.02' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 272.19' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 264.19' to a point; South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 118.03' to a point; 1 22 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T O N , NO 2 B 4❑ 3 F H: (9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 6 7 p 7 F A 9 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6❑ BoarJJCommissioners - j`une J, 20120 ITEM: 13- 8 - 19 Thence with the northern and eastern R03700- 001 - 006 -000 8313 Shiraz way the following two (2) course and distances; Thence South 48 °20'15" East a distance of 174.97' to a point; Thence South 40 °29'15" West a distance of 266.25' to a point; Thence with the eastern and southern of R03700- 001 - 002 -000 817 Porters Neck road the following six (6) course and distances; South 33 °53'14" West North 77 °36'20" West North 12 °32'57" East North 44 °45'48" West South 84 °04'42" West North 48 °00'48" West a distance of 226.29' to a point; a distance of 195.59' to a point; a distance of 156.21' to a point; a distance of 635.91' to an STONE "N'; a distance of 207.34' to a point; a distance of 430.32' to a point; Thence with the southern boundary of R03700- 001 - 003 -000 817 Porters Neck road North 48 °00'48" West a distance of 500.57' to a point; Thence around R03700- 001 - 003 - 001499 Tibbys drive the following three (3) course and distances; North 41 °27'48" East a distance of 285.38' to a point; North 48 °29'24" West a distance of 500.56' to a point; South 41 °00'57" West a distance of 279.00' to a point; Thence with the southern boundary of R02900- 004 -010 -000 421 Tibbys drive the following four (4) course and distances to the southern margin of said Market street; North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 935.83' to a point; North 48 °04'03" West a distance of 999.80' to a point; Thence North 42 °02'57" East a distance of 75.35' to a point; Thence North 48 702'55" West a distance of 252.66' to a point; Thence with the southeastern Market street right of way by old deeds with R02900- 004 - 010 -000 421 Tibby drive, R02900- 004 - 010 - 0018362 Market street, R02900- 004 - 019 -000 8370 Market street, R02900- 004- 009 -000 8376 Market street, R02900- 004 - 008 -000 8380 Market street, and R02900- 004 - 007 -000 8390 Market street the following three (3) course and distances; North 42 °45'04" East a distance of 109.15' to a point; North 42 °13'46" East a distance of 288.18' to a point; North 42 °10'00" East a distance of 60.00' to a point which is the point of beginning. Having an area of 2,287,089 Sq. Ft. or 52.5 Acres more or less as computed by deeds. EXCEPTING from such a 6x10 plot around the "Lewis Buxton" grave site and lands claimed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation. 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M 1 N G T O N, N C 2 8 4 0 3 P H: (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F Al 9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners -ne 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 20 PARAMOUNTE E M G I N E E R I N �. I M C, Upd ❑t Ed: N -EZE I -_:_- 12, 2019 Date: September 30, 2019 The Oaks at Murray Farm Community Meetings Summary The Oaks at Murray Farm has conducted multiple meetings with the Porters Neck community. A brief summary is listed below with detail summary provided at the end. Community Meeting #1 was held on September 30, 2019 with a 400 -450 person attendance. Because of the large group and the concern over the project, the development team listened to comments and asked for community representatives to continue to meet with us to refine the plans. Some of the residents agreed to one meeting held on November 8th, 2019 and included many community HOA presidents and representatives meeting to discuss the plan revised to address many of their concerns including adding buffers, open space, saving a large, significant trees, especially in the apartment portion of the plan to further screen apartments and work the plan into the existing site, reducing the number of apartments (eliminated 2 buildings), pulling the apartment buildings further away from neighboring properties, adding emergency services access -only gates to the Vineyard Plantation road connections to reduce traffic concerns in their neighborhood, agreeing to provide stormwater well in excess of the County's 25 year storm (to provide for the 100 year storm), and to agree to build a turn lane (that is not otherwise a required by the TIA) from Futch Creek to Hwy 17 to alleviate traffic concerns in the area. At the end of this HOA representative meeting, the representatives refused to meet with the development team again stating that we were not addressing their concerns and we would have to agree to disagree. They refused to accept any plans with apartments on the plan. Community Meeting #2 was held on November 12th, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex Auditorium. Given the large number of folks attending the first meeting, we searched for a venue that would agree to allow us to host a meeting with 500 people. After three weeks of searching for a venue that was relatively close to the project site, had free parking for the community, could house the amount of residents interested in the project, and would agree to host a development project meeting, we found the Hampstead Annex Auditorium. It was only capable of housing approximately 250 people at one time, so we divided the meeting into two groups. Those living to the north were asked to attend the first meeting. Those living to the south /east of the project site were asked to attend the second meeting. The majority of questions received at these two meetings were about traffic and concerns over apartments near their homes. Some folks were also concerned about school overcrowding. Full details for the two community meetings are provided below. 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X : ( 9 1 ❑ ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 21 Page 2 of 5 To date, we continue to talk with residents both for and against the project. The development team continues to address as many concerns as is possible to demonstrate that they do want to be good neighbors, but that the developer is proposing a project that does include apartments. The Oaks at Murray Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 1 Notes: Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held a community meeting at Anchor Baptist Church on Futch Creek Rd. from 6:00 -7:00 PM on September 30, 2019. Approximately 400 -450 residents attended the meeting to listen to a presentation of the project and offer comments on the developer's proposal. - Check on school capacity at Porters Neck School (Answer: We will reach out to the NHC Schools folks to discuss) - Because of drought conditions and restriction on irrigation needs, does this cause future water supply issues (Answer: We have not evaluated irrigation at this time, but if water capacity is available, CFPUA will advise throughout the project's development.) - Would like gates on side roads (Answer: We will investigate with our traffic consultant) Will the existing ditches be left open for stormwater flow (Answer: Existing streams will be left open in all plans to date, on -going analysis of stormwater will help us further develop the entire plan) - Price point of units (Answer: Luxury Apartments is target market, prices will vary based on market conditions, but anticipated at $1100 +/ mo) - Will apartments be Section 8 apartments (Answer: no) - People expressed approval of the duplex /single family portion of the development, especially if Logan is the developer, but they are unhappy with the apartments proposed largely due to traffic concerns. (Answer: we are looking at the detailed traffic analysis for the whole project, but we hear the concerns about apartments. We will evaluation the plan and make changes if the developer chooses to do so) - Several people told us to put apartments on the other side of Market Street — it was better land for that. (It is understood that many residents have expressed interest in not having apartments near their homes, however, the future land use plan does identify the area as a growth node for shopping center and denser development. The apartments are clustered in that higher density portion of the site as identified in the FLUP) - Will buffer /vegetation be kept for the existing properties (Yes, to the greatest extent possible and augmented as needed) - Traffic concerns along /at round about on Porters Neck Road (Answer: We will look at both Porters Neck Road and Futch Creek Rd. for any improvements that may alleviate concerns. After the meeting, the traffic consultant conducted a series of studies looking at the roundabout on Porters Neck Road, the Intersection of Porters Neck Road and Market Street and at Futch Creek Rd /Market(HWY 17) intersection. Due to current NCDOT bypass projects and the associated anticipated effects on Porters Neck/ Market intersection and due to constricted land area and the fact that Porters Neck Road is reported to operate at a Level of Service A (the best rating) even after the proposed project is built, Futch Creek Road was the only improvement that could alleviate traffic in any significant way. This is explained in Meeting #2 summary. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 22 Page 3 of 5 - Status of Traffic Study (Answer: submitted, not approved time of Meeting #1) - Phasing of project (Answer: Anticipated build out in 2023 used in traffic report, phasing not determined at this time) - Making sure apartments are for rent (Answer: yes) - The neighbors expressed concern about the amount of traffic this project could cause (Answer: see detailed explanation above) - When the group broke into smaller groups looking at the plans, many people were appreciative of the information, but wanted to talk further with Logan to better understand the product proposed and the overall ramifications to their neighborhoods. (Many folks talked with the development team through phone and email after the meeting) POST MEETING #1 CORRESPONDENCE: After the meeting, the developer had many calls for residents, some now in support of the project. The team has on -going efforts to get information out to residents. POST MEETING #1 CHANGES: After hearing many of the comments, there were changes made to reduce apartment units by nearly 10% and to pull apartments away from the borders. The total unit count was reduced, open space gathered toward the center of the project, refined stormwater to reflect neighbor concerns and site conditions and now accounts for the 100 year storm, and save many large trees on the site. The Oaks at MurraV Farm Conditional Zoning Community Meeting 2 Notes: Paramounte Engineering and Logan Developers, Inc. held two community meetings on the same night at Hampstead Annex Auditorium on Hwy 17. The first meeting for residents to the north of the site occurred from 5:30 -6:30 PM. The second meeting for residents to the south /east of the site occurred from 7:00 -8:00 PM on November 12, 2019. As mentioned in the meeting summary, we wanted to accommodate at least as many folks as attended our first community meeting, but the closest largest venue suitable for the crowd only held 250 people, so we divided the meeting to hear from everyone. The first of the two meetings had approximately 180 people in attendance and the second meeting was a mixture of people staying from the first meeting and new attendees. This second meeting had 80 people. The attached agenda covers the presentation from the development team to the participants. Then the floor was opened to questions and comments. The following is a summary of that community input: - Schools are overcrowded and traffic to those schools is congested (Answer: The developer has a meeting set with NHC Schools folks to discuss, but the traffic consultant, Ramey Kemp, addressed school traffic. Much of the traffic comments related to late busses and not enough bus drivers ) Porters Neck Road traffic will be made worse by apartments/ this project (Answer: Traffic Analysis shows Porters Neck Road is currently a Level of Service A road since the roundabout construction and that after the proposed project is built (using the previously proposed plan with 406 units instead of the current, reduced plan), the Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 23 Page 4 of 5 roundabout will experience a 1 second delay from current conditions at peak hour. And the Porters Neck /Market intersection will add approximately 2 cars at peak hour. However, after the Military Cutoff bypass is complete (anticipated 2022 prior to this project build out), approximately 9,000 cars / day are anticipated to be routed away from this intersection at Porters Neck Road. The intersection after bypass construction is anticipated to operate in quicker movements from either pre or post project development. Stormwater designed to the 100 year storm is not enough (Answer: The stormwater in previous plans has been further evaluated, soil testing has now been performed, and we confirmed we can provide a stormwater design in excess of the County's 25 year requirement. We understand there are concerns from neighbors and have offered a solution that should improve the situation well beyond the minimum requirements). Emergency Services response times were reported at 12 -25 minutes both at this meeting and Meeting #1. (Answer: We heard this at the first meeting and this one, Paramounte Engineering spoke with Fire Marshal David Stone to determine if there was a problem in this area that we are not aware of, if this project can be designed in a way to alleviate any concerns, and if there is something off -site the developer may be able to offer or assist with to help alleviate any concerns. Mr. Stone stated the Porters Neck Communities are served at the some rate as others in the county with fire's first responder typical response times in the 4 -7 minute range and EMS or law enforcement in the 9 minute range. Mr. Stone stated that the fire station existing across from the Shiraz Way entrance of this development would promote one alternate route through the neighborhood for fire and EMS to travel from this station if traffic on Porters Neck Road is impassible, especially since speed bumps are not proposed in our neighborhood. Regarding off -site improvements, Mr. Stone reiterated NCDOT and our traffic consultant in saying that there is not room to widen Porters Neck Road, so no off -site improvement, such as adding a lane, are really possible without taking property from homes along Porters Neck Road. Futch Creek proposed extra turn lane will not fix the traffic problem. An extra right turn lane will not help since the majority of traffic comes out of this intersection and goes to the Uturn to head towards Wilmington. The extra lane will not be used (Answer: Our traffic consultant presented the findings that the intersection queuing time could be nearly cut in half with the addition of a right turn lane, and the extra lane would allow everyone (after the project is built) to cycle through the intersection in 1 light cycle. He further stated that this is a proposal to the community first to add an additional turn lane. If accepted, it would be reviewed by NCDOT and WMPO. They may have comments, want changes, corroborate with the neighbors stated regarding amount of Uturn activity, etc. However, this has not been addressed with NCDOT at this time. If it is desired, the developer is agreeing to pursue this turn lane as a way to help the community. If it is not desired, we do not need to pursue the Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 24 Page 5 of 5 additional turn lane. To date, there has been no requirement from the TIA for the additional turn lane or any other improvement off -site. - There was a death at this intersection recently, this development will bring more accidents and fatalities. (Answer: Ramey Kemp submitted TIA prior to the recent fatality, so that report did not take that into account. However, the consultant responded that he would follow up with NCDOT after the meeting since a fatality triggers a review of the intersection and what could be done to make the situation better. Those findings will be coordinated and addressed in any improvements that happen at that intersection. - There were many comments questioning the validity and methods of the traffic report. Statistics used in the report were questioned. Traffic counts were questioned. The method of traffic analysis was questioned. There was mention of another traffic consultant hired by Vineyard Plantation who had an alternate report contradicting Ramey Kemp's findings. (Response: Ramey Kemp's traffic consultant explained accepted methodologies and how he arrived at each of the questioned statistics. He further explained that the counts were performed over a 48 hour period in a time designated by NCDOT/WMPO scoping meeting (while school was in session). The means and methods of the study have been approved by NCDOT/WMPO. At the time of the community meeting, those two entities are reviewing the findings of the TIA before issuing comments on potential improvements. - Apartments are not wanted here — Logan builds nice single family homes. Build those, can't we propose all duplex and single family that would not be met with opposition. What kind of apartments will they be, what price point? (Response: We have heard this statement, and we are presenting a plan with apartments, but with many concessions to prove that Logan does want to build a nice neighborhood that works with the community. The Logan team evaluated the site for single family and duplexes, and the price of the land prevents the developer from considering single family and duplexes only as an alternative. Furthermore, Logan is planning luxury apartments on the high end geared toward one of the fastest growing market, 62+ looking for rentals. The developer feels this project targets that market and fits well into the Porters Neck Community. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 25 Mo luting DI-to: NEDDE ❑IJ 12, 2019 T❑❑ ❑ 1111❑ ❑ ❑M ❑rr❑❑ ❑EI-❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 1111 ❑-❑❑ M ❑❑FIM❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑d ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 1111❑❑❑ General Note: Two meetings will be held this evening. Both meetings will follow the format and general meeting guidelines as follows. We ask that you abide by these guidelines so participants have a chance to hear the presentation and to ask questions. Meeting 1 from 5:30 -6:30 PM will be held for residents living to the north of the project site. We ask you to exit the building from 6:30 -6:45 so the meeting 2 participants can enter between 6:45 -7:00. The time for exiting will be signaled by the lights flicking on and off. If you refuse to leave, you will be preventing the next group of your neighbors from participating. Meeting 2 from 7:00 — 8:00 PM will be held for residents living to the south /east of the project site. We ask you to exit the building no later than 8:30 PM. Notes from the building manager and development team: o Please do not bring food or drink into the auditorium • The auditorium's building occupancy is approximately 250 people, so we recommend you appoint representatives to attend the meeting in the event attendance exceeds occupancy. This agenda acts as a presentation summary in the event you are unable to attend either meeting. • Doors will be monitored and locked to ingress travel when the building reaches capacity • All doors remain open to egress travel at all times • In the event of emergency, exits are located in the center, front of the building and at each end of the first floor hall. Meeting Agenda & Discussion Points: 1. Introduction 2. Presentation Items will Include: Summary of changes from the 1St community meeting plan to the current plan • Reduced apartment unit count by approx. 10% by removing (2) 12 unit apartment buildings • Increased single family homes by 8 units • Removed 1 duplex building (2 units) • Less overall density o (9/30/19 community meeting plan had 406 total units, current plan has 388 total units) • Pulled apartments towards center of site to further buffer adjacent properties • Added neighborhood parks, open space, and increased buffers • Saved large trees on site- located primarily at Old Market Street • New stormwater design with increased capacity from County's required 25 year storm event to 100 year storm event • Developer is proposing to construct an off -site traffic improvement to alleviate some traffic concerns (this is not part of the recommendations included in the Traffic Impact Analysis, this is offered in direct response to public input received at the last community meeting). All scenarios below represent the full buildout condition. o Add 1 right turn lane on Futch Creek at the Market Street /Hwy 17 traffic light. • After this proposed project is built, queuing time at traffic light reduces from 42 seconds to 27 seconds • This results in all traffic clearing the light in one cycle • The existing Porters Neck Rd. roundabout delay is increased by 1 second at the peak traffic hours • The existing Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection delay increases by 2 seconds (1 -2 extra cars added to queuing • After the Military Cutoff portion of the bypass is constructed (anticipated completion in mid - summer 2022), traffic along Market Street (US 17) is expected to be approximately 20% less (removing approximately 9,000 cars from passing through the intersection at Porters Neck Rd /Market). • Resulting signal adjustments at Porters Neck Rd /Market St. intersection are anticipated to lessen wait time at the intersection from the existing conditions (including this proposed project build out). • The current 2022 completion happens before The Oaks at Murray Farm will be built out (projected 2023 or later). 3. Discussion - If you have additional comments or questions beyond the meeting, please visit the "contact" portion of the project website at www.oaksatmurrayfarm.com Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 26 PARAMOUNTE N C:� I N E E R I M G. I M �_ October 31, 2019 RE: Second Community Meeting for: Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. invite you to a second community meeting on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. After having conversations with various members of the community since our last meeting, we have received feedback, and we want to compile the interested parties again to present our revised plans and current information to the larger community group(s). Because there was such a large group of community members in attendance in our first meeting, we looked for a meeting venue both close to your homes and one that can hold large groups. We have reserved the closest, large venue that agreed to host our community meeting. However, the Hampstead Annex is only able to hold 230 seated people at one time and about 250 people with some standing. (The latter is very close to the auditorium's building occupancy limit for fire safety). We want to be sure everyone has an opportunity to attend, so we will be holding two community meetings back to back to accommodate anyone interested in the project. In order to meet the venue's fire safety requirements, we respectfully ask you to comply with the following: If you live to the north of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. If you live to the east or south of the proposed project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00. If you do not know which group you fall into, please refer to the enclosed plan's north arrow and vicinity map to determine direction of you home in relation to the project site. Please understand that the auditorium's doors will be closed if we reach capacity. We recommend that homeowners' associations and large common - interest groups appoint representatives to attend their respective meeting so those people can get the information out to the larger community in the event we reach the venue's fire safety capacity. The subject tracts of land remain the same as the land you saw in the last meeting. That includes the ± 51.39 acre tract of land bordered by Old Market St., Tibbys Dr., and Shiraz Way and is further identified as New Hanover County Parcels: R03700- 001 - 002 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R02900- 004- 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R02900- 004- 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, and R02900- 004- 010 -000 Since our last community meeting, we have submitted a conditional rezoning application to New Hanover County, but we are continuing to work through questions and comments from the community before finalizing our proposed conditional rezoning plan and setting the Planning Board meeting date. Please reference the enclosed current conditional rezoning plan and join us on the 12th for a look at larger scale plans. Our development team will be on hand to answer questions and discuss the project with neighbors. Community members who live north of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. Community members who live east or south of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 7:00 -8:00. When: November 12, 2019 Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium 15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443 I ❑EIDEMA DREIDE M 1 1I 1 1 Board of ComrAi_o_-9net%:Pd 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 27 -L -f- r v 1-= N C-:; 1 N E E F2 I N G I N C: _ October 31, 2019 RE: Second Community Meeting for: Conditional Rezoning Request of The Oaks at Murray Farm — REVISED SITE PLAN Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Logan Developers, Inc. recently sent you an invitation to our second community meeting. In that invitation mailing, you received a copy of the first community meeting plan for reference. This mailing provides you a copy of the revised plan to be discussed at the November 12, 2019 community meeting at the Hampstead Annex's Auditorium. We are providing you both plans in advance of the meeting so you can see what has changed including reduction in units, saving the site's stately trees and stormwater adjustments. We also have included new park and open spaces areas all while adding additional buffers from adjacent properties to the site. Please join us to hear full details on the 12th. Just a reminder on meeting times: Community members who live to the north or northeast of the proposed project site, please attend the first meeting from 5:30 -6:30. Community members who live to the east /southeast, south, or west /southwest of the proposed project, please attend the second meeting from 7:00 -8:00. When: November 12, 2019 Where: Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium 15060 US -17, Hampstead, NC 28443 ❑77 ❑ TIVEMA DRIDE ❑ EIE[VIE10DDDO Ell ❑ Pn: LT1LnTl i I TI Board of Commilsioners + Juncl 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 28 Qninmunb Megu�§ i ar C Ei�� i1 i €arid Ei s�nin� } c' u t i Icy an i7 +el+ i r5. Lnc_ PMO ca N amp: TI7E A f'Rwrric4p[s_ -al PorteF -s Ckdks The F�ese� aye gl" !'�i1e� Na me Pro ,4,ddrmq f Neigh hicor}w(A Plane Number 5 nna it Address 1 _ a F ,vv d'# } IF- ,. irevIP&P4 XG1057 , LAAJ -rlM-r aP QW&JU61 b^ gin - 3f4)- -7-f,3 Aasd�O -%P rrms),L �A m 1 IL - 9 1 —023 149 Wa466 X jjrrjj j p L 1-0 57. Obt lip I JC 7 0 Vol -' - —' '' fry r ►� r* I� , Ej ,c Ipw A .€ L-' ' _ J it Ar F C .knchur :BMAhYl U LLIrch Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 29 �P.ombcr7 2-Dl9 b-00 P.M Name Address Phan ## Email Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 30 Community Mgctiny rnr -C padilional R arming Rce iics] t�E Lai-An Fkyel M, Ins ProjecL dame = 'l`h.c A rja cv s a 13mters +Dales. T'hr Resme at P-arteg Oaks Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 , n,aknr lSap lfil (:hpren ITEM: 13- 8 - 31 tiLpk- mbLTIQlhi, 2019 60D P_M ca,-" r) J" VU (No;9 F � c�e- e( cs 0 ftj.Ue 'Lr *f : gaim& F EE , ,yam y .yy t +y (L Y�-rr,PLj ; if 0 AM t — 0 - L( Ly - rr J l qqD 6)"P a -i" Lo r , n_ cam. C,ts C e. f or.c:i',�i �. u . q La -t, r4y-.i VI /160 Ir .� Name Address Phone# Email Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 33 M, a MO s 0711M �Wok 0450 ? i v 10 :lr,,rlal 'Rc�ej,�t pg Rpqupgr by T xVo Dr°wolI, Ins:. +- ' f I s� f pW III SA 1 WO M * P t d � r+ 10� °1 KPIR Mn 2r. ME ML a . i` , f r - - . r. � •' , � ate, �- Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ' f I s� f pW III SA 1 WO M (�(%% � Proim-t Nuw.: Tfic Apja•i gt-q at P-Ofters Ook The 9 Q-X. poners Ouk�% fFnL - r )AI ess F ekia-,r-, MAI rt4q Dekwa dab 2 I r Mank - C24- Ale, -)Oolan-e4 '3 4 'S 3 A tv 4 Wz 4 -.T 9QZ24 - L- Z3 I%X—V 4A Ww,-% -Z af, Y ni kdf-� 171 l77 -rL Le ja exd�o 4-60 - 515'7- Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Aiwlwr bapdsi u-humh ITEM: 13-8-35 ON 6;1)0 PA J-b�p LA--% 0� c6;iLST CQrpFouni Sy Meating undijonal Rerxm ng "ucst D 1 �7s 190 wgj�. Inc. + NS111t *: The p�rtme l:+ gt Palos �13k� 'T'k�r }�e�era a a1 briers �E ♦4 �{ or Al I•I' tder;A &AAOU �5 a ISO OP YKAO . i \ .. Ia d } Zllf FCJ - an 3 i .fie y LO Ili a� -. : K $) q Rq u ea ( 1 1914 .6 Rq M i A e.+r• O IfAl uhf, _ Sm -. v4 o c1l, Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 RncUr BapAL Aund ITEM: 13- 8 - 36 Septcuaw llli, 2719 9.- h4M 40 31 Cam' P Wye 61LOO RM 4 c�muili Pwl[r► Zc�nql il N)nal Re L�Xti ng Jqul b[,nr75, E'roiec[ Navil - Tt APijrim. nLs a= ]'�c}rraers Oaks The gcr�r Ott '[}al€� a n Pro Addren } N�" U ' borhood Mine Number EmaM Add rem f F47 Jl dq e:e3 J-�6 - ; F'.FaLs3i� II ThIf.4� -Y re , , i `{ - }l �" - I e P r r }y' 6 � 6r yy L1J s 4 it W 1 i Sf 5 ' i e6 � w 'iL J fj�1 f j y Ck lr f f a J 0 f pf ,j1J d 0 �,I�5''y 1 De Hy ro�� � ' • + f iJ ' - _ ep 72"', J e ZZA LzA 44r T ° ' i ,r F �8 .c-l-LA Wgry K • -- .. • �1 �• — shd —zi AriL6W [5a riSt Chl Board of Commissioners - June ' 1,2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 37 .LP —"-1 rls: 2019 6-W P.m Name Address Phone# Email _ ...... ....�4 z Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 38 Name Address PhonAlt r-mmi1 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 39 Name Address Phone# Email Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 40 Name Add rp- c. -r. DkAmin4# r--a - as Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 41 on Name Address Phinntm rM_%;I Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 42 .i i� t7 ui7.i ly 1' ire tier C'�nditulFL�,1 F n nj. FR- _gucsL by ..;)e,)n IievelaTic m Inc. Tl' coiu :F N3n1C- ` FLO a wnents gi Pcwtc O;sk.% 'The Rogrve of Portm Oaks. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 Amfxir Ike ;mL CNILRUIi ITEM: 13- 8 - 43 Y;`a.� .,i.a�r Rhh. 201$ NOO P.M Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 AFW]Kir ELupiil c'n arch ITEM: 13- 8 - 44 6-D] P-M J r f aE IL � r / � � •• + '� r d + � , ilk + P A ■ e e � MMEM� + FF 3J 11 ' Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 AFW]Kir ELupiil c'n arch ITEM: 13- 8 - 44 6-D] P-M Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 45 I "V Cs,-L ��-p E GO Ir UO M�g Wj Prig mt Name- The Martmcm art ftrters Oaks The Rcscr-c at Pan-ers Oaks Na jw Pn-Lyperiv AdArcm I , Nciehhnirbo-ad Pkame No-mbrir Email Addrem v, Board of Commissioneri'l June 1, 2020 Arichor I Chumb ITEM: 13- 8 - 46 n-,pimj�Lr.Wk 20 Ll' - .9 bpl ?.LL71� ,� a0k- (L) A L.4: L '1C , & Lki,-r, 6-W P.M j sg:, -4nw .8112,-Cf�t L-131L Mw A 2 C oo -a f Ow6e, vic- I e 1 4 (4- rq.4.v4, Ltj Le, C.1 q n och L3 49 d 46�7 r, 0) —Jr z Lie% %C%67lrL9l) L s�7� lu L uv 'r v, Board of Commissioneri'l June 1, 2020 Arichor I Chumb ITEM: 13- 8 - 46 n-,pimj�Lr.Wk 20 Ll' - .9 bpl ?.LL71� ,� a0k- (L) A L.4: L '1C , & Lki,-r, 6-W P.M Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 47 I I Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 48 II 73. 17 .73. I eoffi r LSZ to PO V, up L4 V-4 06} missioners - June 1, 0 ITEM: 13- 8 - 49 (LI, Y+. cammurtity mt'etiar n(fi6ga ] R njag "L1est b an Liev-elopm. Inc. Projeci Ntme:_T]w Apan -w % Pa rs QRkE The Rc5mT -at Fortm Oak-s f t� y C:: �. All LFiUC13WEst Church Board of Commissioners - June 1 ,.2020 ��� ITEM: 13- 8 - 50 ql / el- DO R_I4� i,P M1 c i - �'Lf �N T�'. 2—'v} di L. ""L - I_, .I— { L+d 7 r I I Nil2i LF ! C f. ILI r d t _ Za 7-1-/ r } +I' { 4 J { 1 &5 � C VA lk L 1 t w° f t� y C:: �. All LFiUC13WEst Church Board of Commissioners - June 1 ,.2020 ��� ITEM: 13- 8 - 50 ql / el- DO R_I4� A L- uz ° Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 51 Y- W-Ar j �W CAI i F py,1�) blk C-A( ;>r X611 � r ILIL c pa%:x� .. RYA r .J &4 3 71tytml-t 6�CT-2& U4-+ ILA o Vv-trh° I jo 4141i if wir", St -71 f, 7//4 �•7 lat tu,� � i B r .1 I m npisgsioners - June 1, 2020 113 -8 -52 3o Loa pt 1= l (( .q r ` r i � t O -� Air - f` io - Lt 3 I 4 ,L 1 I V ki T ckl Lice vj- p 044,b(cJ1F,.1 $dn-z, Ve.AAa.� �f Tv M6c�a.AJ WO 9651�C.jAve - )11 -1112 Ssego 61 @ HOMAAL, c i c ck 1WL7 R -MCA Sr Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 53 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request bV Logan Developers Inc Protect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm / Name Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address �t � ,c t 6 3, o ��' ✓.�.t CoTTi�' C� . Co �j f'Q �� 1 ") v1 Zi0 N Gc— 70-� -2-37�7 � r 9/0- qjl -)-to 7 NNA 102- s f c c MW" G S It 1 Ar-�"d ZU W N t bin 866' b' v, rz-j "eC�.. v 401 4q3 -7aa j 7-W q-1 - 0 O'l 17CJ�IilLCS P a tNl Ol iCelrs 0.® �, SSI 1 e Dc • XPI 11 7D '3111 0 ci 3 S -113 W) he w 1 Be 13 90 V C-rr,4�L, P,1 6jl :bD— 7TJ6 5-4,6 Hampstead Annex Building Auditor'um N vPP,��,,hher 12th, 2019 5:30 P.M �oard of Commissioners - June , 2ii2� ITEM: 13- 8 - 54 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm Board of Commissioners - June 1, 02 ITEM: 13- 8 - 55 I&A—' i ""at Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm Nam Property Address / Neighborhood Phone Number %0316 c4 1 ID —� Z — 7(4 e) / e. , Jam, a x 1021 Cr `,& Cn q 10 (02(0- 15`z�i le - id-t 7% ', i T Y w wt " ( � 6S—O P/Sl 7 /0— V tonal , CO 10 -r- Qa6 �, ► r c clI s� e�It- I (1a Hampstead Annex uilding Auditorium Nyv50er 121h, 2019 Board of Commissioners - June ITEM: 13- 8 - 56 Email Address ') - -(OV4 Rk 2 � v �'u Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: The Oaks at Murray Farm Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Proiect Name: -The Oaks at Mu -rray Farm Name Propertv Address / Neighborhood Phone Numher Fmnil Atlrlrocc Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium N v her 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - June �,L6 ITEM: 13- 8 - 58 UYlr ;LS I Do, ea/Z7 << cat-, 74' q/"p 3 g' L K I G�i it es `J b b 3.rt�,�, - SM J ����� elf D '� �'1Sr �,�e,5'�v I�Q 4 ! Q MSm �' a� AN tKi AL /�[� �� -S 7-Ti � b *kU kz CMG �� 74 - 7lS -g706 ✓.. �4r0,,�4 7 sc l d 3 !9 7 -9197 a itI .a 1z; 3 �i JOENWi#1,4 P �Co6.� �I ilOci v�� UG °JAG - (3 A4sabp(e cool ;cq 2340 tars a a,-7 CL ` ell n Srce,1 71 -TIA Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium N v her 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - June �,L6 ITEM: 13- 8 - 58 UYlr ;LS I Do, ea/Z7 << cat-, Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc " erne � 6a ks=at=Mtrrr-aV Fa r -- - -- Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium N?vmrq�er 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - June ITEM: 13- 8 - 59 'Y WMEM �� ♦ 1 ���� F AF • i °.e. ' MI �/ ♦ Ili% r /f ,� rim ME =F-J�ffl�ffl- �1� Fate w-*- Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium N?vmrq�er 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - June ITEM: 13- 8 - 59 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc Dreier^+ Name The Qaks at l)A ay C-,r ivame Property Address/ Neighborhood Phone Number Email Address Z o io�is to g2r n e- C66S CC' Ck \6, 31 'NRn m --la-D-00T <2yoy l r 1A t Gv 3L (fn Zen `tco - 'T P- 7 4 vv, kd 4/ v nJf i -t W - 12 v fl cam I /i me A �4O D l- -' c c r� r 1c Z sc 10 1 r VIA�rice MS Gel .e r- �J `� q ►o ` W w" z n I Aftti oo w. ate e- KCam[6kec n Gb 1j 61 1 tr �- �`( t PS A- G14 9 3 U'S A,) p�Ilo-Gt a 7V- ,V-ic. s- an, Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12th, 2019 5:30 P. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 60 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers Inc. Hampstead Annex Building Auditorium November 12`h, 2019 5:30 P.M Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 61 MMM /G cyfu Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Nuiect Name. The Oaks at Murray Farni Property Address / Neighbo X71 TT 5� 31 `E! Li I L-0 r) vtJ E S s Hampstead Annex Building Auditora d of Commissioners -June '��$gper 12th, 2019 ITEM: 13- 8 - 62 Phone Number 1/7 Email Address % ° C j '?Y''��l°1"'�f�x,` �(C.r S -2 -3� WL guz,141 � 7:00 P.M Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Pruiect Name. The Oaks at Murrav Fain, Name l Property Address/ Neighborhood n l 47 Win e- Ce �Ca✓ � tro 1 v vX CetoKtu -6 t` Vi,,,i-_ Err, cxw 0 6C3' Cv[ c"j 250 UU Phone Number Email Address Qf�t 5KU —G3�4� s e auto �lccr,/Jr d40 9lozg7 (,3g7 o4,n�bey �l o Z t7 Cv eI �aiG�l C 2- 7- f'6S�- �� 1 r� 9. /,o- 9 2. 1 -S-2 Si U �G t (� C•'t v� irQ¢- r/ �t 6L\ ` 7 2-:5 � IzJv 2 Lt 4La— 2 —� 1 e 1`0�, -�]� -► �S VV f�,e ��� _ ��� X31 -S-) (,fa.6c.s0 Hampstead Annex Building Audito�oard of Commissioners -June 1oNT� er 12th, 2019 7:00 P.M ITEM: 13- 8 - 63 Second Community Meeting - Conditional Rezoning Request by Logan Developers, Inc. Proiect Name. The Oaks at Murray Fa, in Hampstead Annex Building Audito� urn N1oyg er 12th, 2019 7:00 P.M oard of Commissioners - June ITEM: 13- 8 - 64 Ila �G �J FAY O�Q� A ti \�P MFNOR �� 0PNks m P�Q m �o VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION W MR. H X I Ot EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE "- -- UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION i - EXISTING WATERMAI N EXISTING TREE, TYP. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 65 ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 388 UNITS 66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45'(3 STORIES) ± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING OAK TREES GRAVITY EWER MH (TYP.) 241nit Apt. 8" GRAVI SEWER( SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i A Unit Apt. dg Z 4 ow Apt" alas N 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (12 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r-- GATE a- M � � I 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING r PARKING PROVIDED: 55 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: I AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES w 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE T w tY Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 65 ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.41 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 388 UNITS 66 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45'(3 STORIES) ± 0.58 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING OAK TREES GRAVITY EWER MH (TYP.) 241nit Apt. 8" GRAVI SEWER( SS ZSS ASS ss -SS i A Unit Apt. dg Z 4 ow Apt" alas N 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (12 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r-- GATE a- M � 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING r PARKING PROVIDED: 55 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: I AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 12 *44 = 528 PARKING PROVIDED: 539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 42 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 388 UNITS x .03 = 11.64 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.82 AC 5.83 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.82 AC 5.83 AC COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. WETLAND AREA, TYP. 55t- I I / I I ;-] �I� L ��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i� fit s WIN -' 2 g ■■■■ ■ II r ■ SETBACK TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP. rrl J� ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE DUPLEX, TYP. F GATE � (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r - - - - I i - -------- - O O O Q 11 1; iso s -ss -ss ` r ` 5 y 0 G Ole STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER ± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT - 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss Rq SS RR ' - - - Z Ell G VITY WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE ( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T TYP. 12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6 O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O 45' ROW �- - - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77 I _I I F--' - ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 % -41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��, I/ � � 36 / `` I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER (D I _ ` 43 i' I T _ � � ± 1.90 AC __ 1 a7 STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ / ± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING WATERMAIN 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U c� O U O Q W c� W W O I V CrIT1� nw F---I h--I ,W Z i 55t- I I / I I ;-] �I� L ��1i^ T � �•rytr�i�i� fit s WIN -' 2 g ■■■■ ■ II r ■ SETBACK TOTAL - 7-UNIT GARAGE, TYP. rrl J� ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN PLAY AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE DUPLEX, TYP. F GATE � (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS) r - - - - I i - -------- - O O O Q 11 1; iso s -ss -ss ` r ` 5 y 0 G Ole STORMWATER `ORMWATER \ STORMWATER ± 0.62 AC oQ° ± 0.56 AC ± 1.29 ACI PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 2.65 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE SINGLE - FAMILY LOT - 20' PERIMETER SETBACK 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) W_ - w w w w FINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss Rq SS RR ' - - - Z Ell G VITY WATER MAIN SEWER MH IRE ( YP.) I (TYP.) I I I l HYDRA I T TYP. 12 13 14 15 25 / / `\ 22 1 21 I 20 1 19 11 1m� " 18 1 17 I 16 1 15 1 14 / 11 1 10 I 9 I 8 I 1 6 O 24 / O p O/ \ ` 11 I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 3 I Off\ O 45' ROW �- - - i6 17 1 39 / `` i / 38 - / -♦ 29 - -j 28- i -27 -i - 26- -� - 30 1 _I - r -7 -T -- 77 I _I I F--' - ~ 40 �7- - - -- i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i fl i 63 I 64 i 65 i 66 % -41 \�S(S;. : - 31 / 66 1` �1_ 1----------- - - -��, I/ � � 36 / `` I I \ 4z / \0(�� O / 3s i 3a i 33 i s2 .O y' 53 STORMWATER (D I _ ` 43 i' I T _ � � ± 1.90 AC __ 1 a7 STORMWATER s 6 as O 6 `` 51 / \ / ± 1.08 AC ' I 49 I TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING WATERMAIN 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U c� O U O Q W c� W W O I V CrIT1� nw F---I h--I ,W Z O U) w tY U� W H Ln H � � N W�U o �h � o � H LL_ (� z O Lu O ^ IM U wo. �? z c 0 ��N z 3 c I ~a LU y 4-4 ^ `� s W r C\] biC �z A W W H H �U C',o ocz> N N Z O 11 O a� Q U) 2 z 00 0 O LL 0 (n J Q Z � } z 0 a C, L' H E0 0 Q Z LU w z W �0In O OJ�w o > zZY Q a �°T ww�?�0 o o�a 000 SEAL LP- 1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE Adiacent Property Owners - The Oaks at Murrav Farm STAKS MARIANNA 734 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 734 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON HENSHAW JUSTIN W TONYA A 8409 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8409 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON LAMBETH ROBERT L MARY G 709 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 709 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON ROWAN ROBERT 426 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 426 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON COVIL ELLIS M JR ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR TODD, NC 28684 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON SANFORD UNIE 0 321 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 321 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON BATTS RICHARD A MELISSA E 8401 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8401 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON OLONE DIANNE C 705 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 705 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON TODD JERRY W JR LEANN S 420 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 420 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON PINSON MICHAEL D SARAH M 430 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 430 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON GREINER FRANCES S 802 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 802 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON HARRISON RUSSELL D SR VERDALE D 208 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 208 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON SPENCER YVONNE D 508 TIBBY'S DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 508 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON FIDLER ANDREW F MARY E 438 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 438 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON WEAVER RONALD D KIMBERLY J 722 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 722 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BERRY COLLIN M SUSAN V 425 LADY BUG LANE WILMINGTON, NC 28411 425 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON MROZ GREGORY E RACHEL M 422 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 422 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 8330 MARKET ST WILMINGTON VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 730 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON PATTERSON RONALD JR JENNIFER 416 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 416 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON CAUDILL JEREMY RUSSELL JESSICA JO 1218 BOWFIN LN UNIT 2 CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 8417 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON GENES JOSHUA K SAMANTHA S 453 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 453 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON LATSTETTER ROBERT ANN 634 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 634 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON CUSHENBERRY JAMES ANGELA JANEY 629 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 629 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON NECHES WILLIAM TRUST PO BOX 10871 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 421 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON MCMULLAN THERESE M 11047 SCOTTS LANDING RD LAUREL, MD 20723 514 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BARNHILL STEVEN AMY 8421 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8421 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON THOMAS BRYAN C ETAL 1425 AVENEL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 609 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON ONATE JAMES F LAUREL H 608 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 608 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON DOLLAR DUSTY L JILL K 620 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 620 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON FILAK JEFFREY M CHRISTEL P 418 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 418 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON BLTD PROPERTIES LLC 8405 FREESTONE AVE HENRICO, VA 23229 817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON KNITTEL PATRICK A BRITTANY E 713 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 713 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON BUCKINGHAM JAMES JR ELIZABETH 612 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 612 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON NESTER DALLAS G LYNNE W 225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8410 MARKET ST WILMINGTON ZIERMANN THOMAS R PATRICIA M 725 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 725 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 28411 8376 MARKET ST WILMINGTON HALL STEPHEN C JENNIFER 500 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 500 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON LEWIS CHARLES W E ELIZABETH 730 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 730 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 66 MARGUCCIO DAVID J WENDY E 606 WINERY WAY HARTWICK ROBERT W FARANAKA A 618 WINERY WAY CONKLIN MARCUS R 406 LADY BUG LN MCKOY HUBERT JEROME ALICE N 520 TIBBYS DR DEEN MICHELLE 305 PORTERS NECK RD KITCHEN CHARLES TABITHA A 8402 YEARLING LN USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W 325 BRETONSHIRE RD WHALEY FAMILY IRREVOCABLE ASSET PROT 625 WINERY WAY OPALKA SCOTT COLLEEN 434 CHABLIS WAY MARTIN DANNY CJR ANGELITA S 705 PORTERS NECK RD HALAC KENT E ALAI NA J KIM 742 WINERY WAY JAMES ELSIE C IV AMY W 516 TIBBYS DR ELKIN TIMMIE L CHERI P 404 TIBBY'S DR SHAW DANIEL 429 LADY BUG LN COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR RENYE KEITH E HEATHER L 430 CHABLIS WAY HARTZELLJOSHUA KIMBERLY JOY 715 PORTERS NECK RD ROBSON CHELSEA B SIMON D 428 TIBBYS DR MCDONALD TAMMY Y SEAN V 637 WINERY WAY EDWARDS MICHAEL DAYMA 512 TIBBYS DR FONVILLE RICHIE D CATHLEENA L 8418 YEARLING LN BUNN DEREK W ANGELA 8407 REISLING AVE HUDSON MICHAEL L DEANNA H 706 WINERY WAY LLOYD MANUEL W HELENA C 204 CHABLIS WAY MURRAY ROBERT C III ULRIKE H 8313 SHIRAZ WAY BASS JOEL PERCY II SANDRA C 511 TIBBYS DR CARTER DIANE H 313 PORTERS NECK RD LIOTTA RAY ETAL 729 WINERY WAY POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC JOHNSON KYLE C AMANDA T 8403 REISLING AVE MORGAN KENNETH TERESA 507 TIBBYS DR HOSS GREGG E HEIDI HANH THI 608 CHABLIS WAY PORTER ALTON G JOAN A 719 PORTERS NECK RD CAVAN JOHN JOANNE W 721 WINERY WAY KUPERUS RYAN KELLI 0 426 LADY BUG LN REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA I REEVES CHAD E PATRICIA C 401 LADY BUG LN SNEEDEN DAVID G ETAL 1840 LIVE OAK PKWY 5 ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST GATES ANDREW P STACEY N 8501 BISON CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 TODD, NC 28684 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 67 606 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 618 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 406 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 520 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 305 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8402 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 8412 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 625 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 434 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 705 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 742 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 516 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 404 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 429 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 430 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 715 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 428 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 637 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 512 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8418 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 8407 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 706 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 204 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 8313 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON 511 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 313 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 729 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8342 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8403 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 507 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 608 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 719 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 721 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 426 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 417 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 401 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 207 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 805 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8380 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8501 BISON CT WILMINGTON RICKS BARBARA MELVIN 615 TIBBYS DR MARLOWE RONALD C 701 PORTERS NECK RD ROSSI RICHARD A ANDREA E 8406 YEARLING LN REGISTRY AT VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA 3301 BENSON DR COTHREN FAMILY TRUST 301 PORTERS NECK RD DALLOS RANDALL P KRISTIN M 8425 ROSEMARY LN COTHREN FAMILY TRUST 301 PORTERS NECK RD GUO LIANHONG L QINGNAN YAO 436 CLOVERDALE DR BASTIAN JARVIS R CATHERINE A 518 CHABLIS WAY TURNER CHRISTOPHER W JEANNE H 515 TIBBYS DR MICHAELSON MARTIN J ANN MCCARTHY JONATHAN ERIN 738 WINERY WAY KARAM BERNARD J EILEEN M 710 WINERY WAY NUNALEE WALTER H II ALLYN S 604 TIBBYS DR SMITH CRAIG ANDREA 8413 ROSEMARY LN OGDEN VOL FIRE DEPT INC ETAL 7375 MARKET ST SPRADLEY SANDRA M ETAL 8376 MARKET ST FORCINITO DAVID DANA 523 TIBBYS DR NICHOLSON MATTHEW S 410 LADY BUG LN DAVIDSON BRIAN CATHERINE S 8402 REISLING AVE READY CHRISTINE ETAL 2020 SCRIMSHAW PL HENDERSON JOHN A LAUREN 216 CHABLIS WAY KRISTY JACOB 414 LADY BUG LN MURRAY BEN G HEIRS 9225 PINEY WOODS RD WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER L MELISSA D 710 CHABLIS WAY WHITE MAJOR LEE IV 605 TIBBYS DR LEA ROBERT GLENN ETAL 519 MARKET ST COSTELLO RONALD J NORA A 604 CHABLIS WAY HIGH NICKOLAUS M KRISTY M 718 WINERY WAY BOWDITCH BRENT G SARA N 633 WINERY WAY MANCHESTER AARON D AMANDA P 304 CHABLIS WAY MADEJ MICHAEL SR DYLAH S 417 PORTERS NECK RD THOMAS TAD L REBECCA J 501 TIBBYS DR HERRING HERMON GREGORY 412 TIBBYS DR GREEN JAMES A JR VIVIAN T BONEAU ROBERT W LAURA K 8410 YEARLING LN DOWD GREGORY P JR KARYL R 613 TIBBYS DR BRIGGS PAUL PATRICIA 702 CHABLIS WAY JOSE KRISTOPHER M KRISTIN A 300 CHABLIS WAY SHAFFIN PROPERTIES LLC 1515 CHESTNUT ST MORGAN DAVID P MICHELLE S 630 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SUITE 535 RALEIGH, NC 27619 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WEXFORD, PA 15090 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 11171 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILLARD, NC 28478 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 11157 WILMINGTON, NC 28404 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 68 615 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 701 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8406 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 301 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8425 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 221 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 602 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 518 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 515 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 746 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 738 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 710 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 604 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8413 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 8310 SHIRAZ WAY WILMINGTON 8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 523 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 410 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8402 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 102 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 216 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 414 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8370 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 710 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 605 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8320 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 604 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 718 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 633 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 304 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 417 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 501 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 412 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 97 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 8410 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 613 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 702 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 300 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 630 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD MURRAY ROBERT C JR EMMA Y TR 8370 MARKET ST COBLE RAY MARION KWANG HYONG 522 CHABLIS WAY ONUFROCK KENNETH MARIA 418 LADY BUG LN EUBANKS JAMES R JOAN C 718 CHABLIS WAY FIELDS HARRY M LEEANNE P 437 LADY BUG LN LONG ROBERT DEVITT 217 PORTERS NECK RD LEA R GLENN ETAL THOMAS RONALD D TRACY J 510 CHABLIS WAY JAGUTIS JARED BRONWYN 702 WINERY WAY VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC STANFIELD JEFFREY L KATHRYN C 714 WINERY WAY VINEYARD PLANTATION HOA INC 3301 BENSON DR LOEHR GREGORY B AMANDA E 442 CHABLIS WAY ALTMAN SAMUEL R 801 PORTERS NECK RD TERRY ADRIENNE R 701 WINERY WAY BECKWITH RAYMOND J LAUREN 454 LADY BUG LN USSERY CHARLES D SR SHERRY W 325 BRETONSHIRE RD EDWARDS RICKY N KAREN 8406 MARKET ST KLINE SCOTT A AMY C 638 WINERY WAY LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P 8356 MARKET ST GIRARD DENNIS J 424 TIBBYS DR BALDINELL RICHARD JESSICA A 8405 ROSEMARY LN CONNER TRACIE LANCE 610 WINERY WAY DEGROOT RACHEL LYNN SANCHEZ CADE A ALEXA N 414 CHABLIS WAY MIKLOUCICH FRANCIS J JR LINDSAY 412 CHABLIS WAY WOODS BERNICE ROGER 299 HOLDER RD NAGLE CHRISTOPHER M ANGELA PAIGE COI 645 WINERY WAY NGUYEN HAI D LOAN P 446 LADY BUG LN CIVELLI RICHARD V JENNIFER L 8414 YEARLING LN CROOM CHRISTOPHER B AMY L 726 CHABLIS WAY BOYELL JOSEPH J KATHLEEN A SMYTHE 308 CHABLIS WAY HUFHAM FORREST MELISSA 8429 ROSEMARY LN OLSON PETER RICHARD 601 TIBBYS DR COVIL ELLIS M LIFE EST ETAL 305 ELK SUMMIT DR GOSLINE DENNIS YVETTE M 8674 GRAYSON PARK DR LEEDS JONATHAN P JENNIFER E H 504 TIBBYS DR LONG JACOB R BRITTANY 402 LADY BUG LN BAUCOM KEVIN E DEBRA P 641 WINERY WAY REAL SOUND VENTURES LLC 2317 LYNNWOOD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 4014 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 12051 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 RALEIGH, NC 27609 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PO BOX 7 NANUET, NY 10954 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BALTIMORE, OH 43105 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 TODD, NC 28684 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 69 801 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8390 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 522 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 418 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 718 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 437 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 217 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 203 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 510 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 702 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 642 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 714 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 614 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 442 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 725 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 701 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 454 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8414 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8406 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 638 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8356 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 424 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8405 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 610 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 408 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 414 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 412 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 524 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 645 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 446 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8414 YEARLING LN WILMINGTON 726 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 308 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 8429 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 601 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 8422 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 213 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 504 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 402 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 641 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 713 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON POORE LEE L 212 CHABLIS WAY MUIR GARY S AMIEE L 422 LADY BUG LN HIATT ROBERT C ETAL 8417 ROSEMARY LN WASSERBERG MARTIN J ETHEL D 8406 REISLING AVE DE LA ROSA DAVID YACKELINE M 433 LADY BUG LN WOOD WILLIAM MARY 734 CHABLIS WAY FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST 421 TIBBYS DR LETTS PAUL TRACY B 317 PORTERS NECK RD MANN JASON D ERIN E 809 PORTERS NECK RD DEMARCO TERESA M RANDY 722 WINERY WAY CARR DANIEL C SHENAN J 1461 FINAL LANDING LN FICKEN ROLF H LORI A 622 WINERY WAY GATWOOD ELDEN JOHN 519 TIBBYS DR GREEN CHRISTABELL 101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD HESSENIUS JAY S BRANDI 706 CHABLIS WAY MAKO KOURTNEY C 733 WINERY WAY WARREN JOHN D 501 PORTERS NECK RD JONES APRIL B 405 LADY BUG LN NESTER DALLAS LYNNE W 225 CREEKSIDE EAST DR TYLER STEPHEN A DOROTHY J 804 PORTERS NECK RD FOY ANTONIA M LIFE EST 421 TIBBYS DR BISSELINK FRANK HBM JEAN M 8433 ROSEMARY LN CHAMP MCD -DAVIS FOUNDATION PO BOX 1268 HOLT REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES INC PO BOX 53157 MARLING JAMES B ETAL 721 PORTERS NECK RD LONG MIKEL F KATHRYN P 8350 MARKET ST WHELDON CHARLES R 717 PORTERS NECK RD COLENDA BENJAMIN E HEATHER A 813 PORTERS NECK RD BLACHER RYAN D JESSICA C 626 WINERY WAY POPE PROPERTIES ON 17 LLC PO BOX 4014 ZHAO YAN CHONG HUA LIN 408 CHABLIS WAY MILLIKEN GAIL GEORGE W 4473 AMELIA CT BOUGHTON RICHARD RJR JENNIFER 616 CHABLIS WAY POPE JERRY W 400 TIBBYS DR DEXTER STACY P PATRICIA L 508 SHUNEY ST SANTANIELLO AMATO ELAINE M 409 LADY BUG LN BLTD PROPERTIES LLC 8405 FREESTONE AVE SORENSEN SHAUN 17 SLOOP ST AEIN MARGARET 717 WINERY WAY CRUMRINE KEVIN T CHRISTINA B 621 WINERY WAY ADAMS ANDREW D JODI N 714 CHABLIS WAY Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 70 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28402 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 HENRICO, VA 23229 SWANSBORO, NC 28584 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 212 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 422 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8417 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 8406 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 433 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 734 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 421 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 317 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 809 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 722 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 726 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 622 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 519 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 101 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON 706 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 733 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 501 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 405 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 8408 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 804 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8362 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 8433 ROSEMARY LN WILMINGTON 1011 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8312 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 721 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 8350 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 717 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 813 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 626 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 8318 MARKET ST WILMINGTON 408 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 617 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 616 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 400 TIBBYS DR WILMINGTON 401 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 409 LADY BUG LN WILMINGTON 817 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 309 PORTERS NECK RD WILMINGTON 717 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 621 WINERY WAY WILMINGTON 714 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON HOLLIMAN GREGORY C REGINA T 738 CHABLIS WAY WAGNER TRACY L 220 CHABLIS WAY MESSINEO MICHAEL CINDEE 612 CHABLIS WAY MITCHELL WADE S TRUST NUMBER TWO 2616 HIBERNIA ST PERDUE MICHAEL W KAYOKO M 8410 REISLING AVE RAYMER MELISSA E 312 CHABLIS WAY Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 8 - 71 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 DALLAS, TX 75204 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 738 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 220 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 612 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON 600TIBBYSDR WILMINGTON 8410 REISLING AVE WILMINGTON 312 CHABLIS WAY WILMINGTON PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E F? I N G, I N C. The Oaks at Murray Farm Stormwater Supplemental Information As part of the Oaks at Murry Farm project, and any other project in the county, the applicant understands the sensitivity and importance in both controlling the stormwater runoff from our site and maintaining the existing drainage patterns from our adjacent properties. To that end, we have performed the necessary on the ground surveying, investigation, soil testing, wetland delineation and meeting with landowners that live in this area to determine the most advantageous design to meet the points stated above. The applicant by its own accord is placing a condition on the site of controlling the runoff from the 10 inch — 24 -hour storm (which is the 100 yr storm as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design Manual), which is significantly greater than the County required 8.05 inch — 24 -hour storm (which is the 25 -yr event as defined by the New Hanover County Storm Water Design Manual). In addition, the current drainage ditch (creek) that flows through this property will not be filled in or cut off any existing drainage. The creek will only be piped minimally for the road crossing required for the site. The stormwater will be controlled by a combination of wet detention ponds in the middle of the site and an infiltration basin on the eastern property line near Shiraz Way. The infiltration basin was chosen in that location based on the soils test performed by a registered soil scientist, his test yielded an infiltration rate that measured over 20 inches/hr which deems it a perfect site for infiltration (preliminary calculations have been run utilizing a 10 in/hr infiltration rate to remain conservative). As part of this infiltration device, strict specifications will be provided during the construction phase to maintain the natural soil parameters, ie, to not disturb the baseline soils which can cause such devices to not function in the manner intended. An operations and maintenance agreement will also be required to ensure continual maintenance after construction. The applicant in other developments has built such devices and has the experience and construction expertise to have such facilities function as intended. During downstream outfall analysis, it was determined that there are some existing residential properties that have low elevations on their property without a true outfall. With this in mind the preliminary site plan has been adjusted to account for the stormwater management discharging to the three well defined outfall ditches (the two ditches through the middle of the property and the roadside swale along Porters Neck Rd). The existing runoff from the proposed development property to these low areas will effectively be reduced as the built - upon area from the development will be collected and conveyed to the stormwater control measures where it will be treated and over detained to meet the aforementioned requirements. For the downstream outfalls, the design team will analyze and coordinate information/findings with New Hanover County Engineering during the permitting process. However, with placing the 100 yr storm condition on the site, the downstream features will not be affected adversely by the construction of this site. 1 2 2 C 1 N E M A D R I V E W I L M I N G T ❑ N. N C 2 S 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 9 - 1 �G �J J � FINy O P A Pti MFN�FN 5 �RitrF yq << sNOP�S O p,FzO��JE �m 0 �o VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION �I W x �w I X Ir O EXISTING TREE, TYP. EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION EXISTING WATERMAI N I" 111 W nnarq - . I ITEM: 13- 9 - 2 wJ ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW - DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 7.33 DU /AC (388 UNITS) 384 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. (65'x112' MIN.) 34 UNITS 288 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) DIVIDED ENTRY DRIVE TO PRESERVE EXISTING LARGE TREES ± 1.08 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH POOL AND POOL HOUSE 8" GRAVITY SEWER (TYP ) W �O J ■J 4�W91,',,a ,,, ■, 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET Existing Ditch to Be Cleaned & Stabilized; to Remain Unpiped SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 528 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 12 *44 = 528 PARKING PROVIDED: 539 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (11 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 42 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQURED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 4 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 384 UNITS x.03 = 11.52 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN. ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 5.76 AC 5.83 AC MIN. COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. 24 UNIT APARTM T GRAVITY SEWER MH - BUILDING, TYP. (TYP.) (12 TOTAL BUILDIN S) GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA, NOTES THIS TYP. SHEET Proposed Existing Culvert Pond with Outfall into Stream ± 1.55 AC ACTIVE OPEN S ACE WITH POSSIBLE WALKING TRAIL /OPEN P Y AREA ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE PEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PA GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP. NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.) SHEET JL � ea9 q �n�t PPS- d1 � 2 �N . from/ fi- ' - k b% b Fhl�kbldd z: - STORMWATER I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3 - ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC I24'Unit APt. BTtlg. 24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH 20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) Stormwater Pond Outfalls to i i i i i i i i Ditch b rd �d rd SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES- 1 . REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) 11 1 I W W Q W FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss • 8" WA TERMA N (TYP) G VITY FIRE SEW MH (TYP.) I I HYD NT W I (TYP.) -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - I O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I� 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A � . 16 1 O 1 O 1 O O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I. \ 2 , L -, L I-N - - - -��� ROW EdL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ 1 35 O � O - - - - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I r - - - - _ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��� 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; sz ; I _ _ l ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 33 ` , /�, s6 \ \` 51 \, 1 zs i 01 G: 0 \ % STORMWATER I 3s • > 0" INFILTRATION BASIN ±1.90 AC I BUFFER/OPEN �` �`1 40 __- I a1 RMWATER I I SPACE (Djs! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47 1.29 AC I I I O 1 Q , as , as , O L - - - - - - _ _ -/ - f- - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/ �- - - - /- VEGETATIV UFFER\✓ Stormwater Pond Outfalls to Ditch nn PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD ± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE \ \ \ \ / Existing Ditch Soils Tested in Infiltration Basin proved Infiltration Rate is Very High; Infiltration Rate 20" / Hr. f--� -I CJ� Existing Swale As Outfall for Infiltration Basin U 0 w Culvert Takes Water Q W from Swale to Adjacent Ditch W W O I V J nW i� W Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' a z I O Z JL � ea9 q �n�t PPS- d1 � 2 �N . from/ fi- ' - k b% b Fhl�kbldd z: - STORMWATER I I I e I � jgPt B % QS PPS' •3 - ,PP e` :g Z• ±1.20 AC I24'Unit APt. BTtlg. 24' SETBACK BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGH 20' IMTER BUILDING SETBACK 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) Stormwater Pond Outfalls to i i i i i i i i Ditch b rd �d rd SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES- 1 . REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; RK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE - FAMILY LOT 65'x 120', TYP. (65'x 112' MIN.) 11 1 I W W Q W FINERY WAY ; s W ss ss • 8" WA TERMA N (TYP) G VITY FIRE SEW MH (TYP.) I I HYD NT W I (TYP.) -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - I O14 15 1 25 24 , 21 1 20 1 19 I� 18 1 17 1 16 1 15 1 A � . 16 1 O 1 O 1 O O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O O \ 22 14 \ O O I y 1 S 1 7 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 I. \ 2 , L -, L I-N - - - -��� ROW EdL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ 1 35 O � O - - - - 1 zs CENTRAL GREEN 34 I I I r - - - - _ i 3s ±0.87 AC ` ��� 52 s3 sa ss ss s7 sa ss so s1 ; sz ; I _ _ l ' 37 /I cgs ♦ 27 33 ` , /�, s6 \ \` 51 \, 1 zs i 01 G: 0 \ % STORMWATER I 3s • > 0" INFILTRATION BASIN ±1.90 AC I BUFFER/OPEN �` �`1 40 __- I a1 RMWATER I I SPACE (Djs! ` 1� �r 46 \ 47 1.29 AC I I I O 1 Q , as , as , O L - - - - - - _ _ -/ - f- - 20 PERIME ER SETBACK/ �- - - - /- VEGETATIV UFFER\✓ Stormwater Pond Outfalls to Ditch nn PORTERS NECK ROAD ± 1.40 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD ± 2.65 A (PARTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDES WETLAND) TIBBY'S DRIVE PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT ± 5.83 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE \ \ \ \ / Existing Ditch Soils Tested in Infiltration Basin proved Infiltration Rate is Very High; Infiltration Rate 20" / Hr. f--� -I CJ� Existing Swale As Outfall for Infiltration Basin U 0 w Culvert Takes Water Q W from Swale to Adjacent Ditch W W O I V J nW i� W Prelimimary Stormwater Exhibit 0 200 400 600 feet N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' a z O Z I— W N z O U W W d O F- Z W w LD U W > w > U� W �T1 OWN �U W z H 0 O r� O LL z Z OoWZ 0 J WU z - ow 0o � N 0', 00 4 ^ a� W N C) O Z U t7 W W H ~ 0 O WO �o o� N N Z O II O o7 Q U Z 00 ry O O a¢ Z Z U <W (D° w F- zLLjO W O � Z_ > o > Z W O U J J W Z d 0d FL Q >Z W J > U OWOOU SEAL LP- 1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 10 - 1 �G ,�G �J ,�o J � e�RNFyroJgr ����5 FwY OAP o� A MFi y�FR 5 OP`�S O �a VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE �\ NORTH SITE DATA TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RMF -L ALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (12) BUILDINGS DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY: SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: OTHER DWELLINGS: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: ± 2.12 ACTIVE OPEN SPACE WITH OTHER AMENITIES POSSIBLE INCLUDING: COURTYARD, CLUBHOUSE & POOL, DOG PARK, AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES PRESERVE EXISTING LARGE TREES, INTEGRATE IN OPEN SPACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RAISED OR BURIED; PENDING DUKE ENERGY COORDINATION 7 -UNIT GARAGE, TYP. (7 TOTAL BUILDINGS) POSSIBLE LEASING OFFICE/ CLUBHOUSE AMENITIES EXISTING TREE, TYP. EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO BE UPFITTED FOR PROJECT ENTRANCE THIS LOCATION EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 STORY, 12 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (1 TOTAL BUILDING) Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 11 -1 ►W x r� H� X gfil w - x ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) "00000 SEEMMEN F I In �=__ Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l. tl_v-qvv 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 4 *44 = 176 30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING Apt Bldq. j 16 Unit ' 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) cam} 314 ADA SPACES: 16 Unit APt. B tlq. GARAGES: ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 - 008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900- 004 - 009 -000, R03700- 001 - 007 -000, R03700- 001 - 006 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -000, R02900- 004 - 010 -001, R03700- 001 - 003 -000, R03700- 001 - 002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI - FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU /AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU /AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI - FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET 10' 20' 20' N/A 45' (3 STORIES) "00000 SEEMMEN F I In �=__ Pli"_17lp WE- --- - l. tl_v-qvv 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SITE DATA (CONT'D) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES PER 24 -UNIT BUILDING 4 *44 = 176 30 SPACES PER 16 UNIT BUILDING 6 *30 = 180 22 SPACES PER 12 UNIT BUILDING 1 *22 = 22 PARKING PROVIDED: 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA AND GARAGE SPACES) SURFACE SPACES: 314 ADA SPACES: 12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 63 SPACES AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUB/ POOL HOUSE: 400 SF PARKING REQURED: 4 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 8 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES - SHARED WITH w APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED) PASSIVE OPEN SPACE 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN. ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN. COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PASSIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. 8" GRAVITY SEWER (TYP.) - 2 STORY, 16 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP (6 TOTAL BUILDINGS) ± 0.31 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE GATE-SEE WETLAND AREA, NOTES THIS TYP. SHEET a W Apt. o"T 16 nit Apt. B dg. m0 m 1nd �ss ��$ -uG -SS- _w _w 24 Unit APt ZA Jc`PP�_ e ag -- 4 nit Bdg ed9 ST .I-t} za una Apt. s ae. SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHAT ARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREA AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. 20' PERIMETER SETBACK/ VEGETATIVE BUFFER ± 1.88 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE (EXCLUDING WETLANDS) WITH 8" WATERMAIN (TYP.) POTENTIAL AMENITIES TO INCLUDE: TRAIL, OPEN PLAY AREA, DOG PARK, CLUBHOUSE & POOL GATE FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY; ± 0.93 AC ACTIVE OPEN SPACE, NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DESIGN AND PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH; TYPICAL FOR ALL GATES PROPOSED GATE-SEE DUPLEX, TYP. NOTES THIS (17 TOTAL BUILDINGS MAX.) 20' PERIMETER SETBACK SINGLE- FAMILY LOT FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) F_ 65'x 120', TYP. as I;q _SS w w w -- Z w WINERY WAY ; s w ssw ss vy 7 -- r� W I -1 1 SEW VIMH - -- - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -, - - -- - - -- - - I O O O O O O O O ° 25 22 21 I 20 I 19 11lY ' 18 1 17 I 16 I 15 / 14 / `\ 12 ` 11 I 10 I O 1 O I O 1 0 1 0 1 O I O I c): 0 I. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I / 1 1 m 7 I g I 5 1 4 1 3 1 P - s W _�5 _� 5 _ _Ss_ 5 _ _ = 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ 5s__ ss_ S 5 ,.� ° ° , ss \� s� ssssss 45' ROW -sss5 ss� N NEIGHBORHOOD PARK/ ° - - - - - - - 7 ' 3s CENTRAL GREEN a4 ��''� °� 0: 0: .I g 2�J 36 �` S �, +0.65 AC `` ' ° ` 52 ; 53 i 54 i 55 i 56 i 57 i 58 i 59 i 60 i 61 i 6z I a7 A �; \ 27 �T '��' `` 33 �� �% 51 I I EXISTING 55555 I I ,( / \ j \ I ` 38 / �R /rL 28 / z9 I ao I a1 I 32 , s0 % \� STORMWATER I WATERMAIN 0 I I I l ; `•_ / ° ° ° as / INFILTRATION BASIN I I % 0 PT I I V � �` �I ------ - - - - -- -1.90 AC I I VEGETATED /_ ORMWATER \ STORMWATER I I I BUFFER/ j 41 /�yT T 1 ` 47 ± 1.20 AC ± 1.29 AC I •�� / 42 I 43 I a4 1 15 1 O OPEN SPACE \�� / I I I ` as _ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ` / L20' RIMETER SETBACK/ \ ` - -- L - , - -� - - - - - - - - - - - -� - - � - - - VEG ATIVE Bl)FFER � SEE INSET FOR GATED ACCESS OPTION TIBBY'S DRIVE mow: wZI 3 STORY, 24 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. (4 TOTAL BUILDING) 24' SETBACK FOR BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 35' IN HEIGHT 20' PERIMTER BUILDING SETBACK -M PORTERS NECK ROAD VEGETATED BUFFER BEHIND DUPLEXES GRAVITY SEWER MH (TYP.) PROPOSED 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT 11x111/"•111 AM ! ATr XAnT1 I C IM Kl OR )ENTS \ ± 5.89 AC PASSIVE OPEN SPACE TURNAROUND LANE FOR DRIVERS WITHOUT ACCESS RFID \ \ \ \ \ / \ I 0 200 400 600 feet GATED ACCESS OPTION PER PLANNING BOARD CONDITION Lv NOT TO SCALE N O R T H SCALE: 1" =200' O U f�l O U O Q W W ,W F-�-1 O I r� V J nW F-'-i I--I W rn W rn (O o N In z w O U �D z H z g U) Z O c� Z ~ o0 ~ z O w J a Z O v _ z ~ ° Q o m z 0 z U O z a a_ 0 U_ W � a a Z O °w �Q z °w w W > W w x N w w cc M x U'.1 H W oc N �U W w ll� O O��h W H z_ z O w O v J U WO m0 w z � 0 N z o� 1 W p a� U U w z N s-1 o 1� 4-1� U 0� A W O W � O xW0 00 N p N N Z N I O Q U ~ ~ » z >_ 00 O LL >_ as 0 Z - U D <�� �a�° W azww LLJ Z w o w Z y O U J J W Z W Z J (Z 0dLLLL] >Z> Q W J -> U f- Q w Q W DU)DDU SEAL LP-1 PEI JOB #: 19305.PE 1 Gc�IMUN6'j�' Prepared by: PARAMOUNTE F N G F N F E R I N G. I N G. 122 Cinema Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 (910) 791 -6707 (0) (910) 791 -6760 (F) NC License #: C -2846 DATE: 22 January 2020 SCALE: 1 " = 1 00' At 24" x 54" NORTH z sTo�zy, 16,--UN rr , t3U 4 L. l . —1 tee) `f�UNf� [ � �' f � ] i [ � I � I � ►� � I � l Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 11 - 2 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: PROPERTY PINS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: RMF- LALLOWABLE DENSITY: PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY: PROPOSED UNITS TOTAL UNIT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: DUPLEXES: (17) BUILDINGS APARTMENTS: (4) 24 -UNIT BUILDINGS (6) 16 -UNIT BUILDINGS (1) 12 -UNIT BUILDING ± 52.39 ACRES R02900- 004 - 007 -000, R02900- 004 -008 -000, R02900- 004 - 019 -000, R02900 -004- 009 -000, R03700- 001- 007 -000, R03700- 001 -006 -000, R02900- 004 -010 -000, R02900- 004 -010 -001, R03700- 001- 003 -000, R03700- 001 -002 -000 R -15, R20 RMF -L* (RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY LOW- DENSITY) SINGLE FAMILY, FARM, VACANT SINGLE- FAMILY, DUPLEX, MULTI- FAMILY COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENERAL RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC (523 UNITS) 5.73 DU/AC (300 UNITS) 300 UNITS 62 LOTS - 65'X 120' TYP. 34 UNITS 204 UNITS SITE DATA (CONT'D) DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS PERIMETER SETBACK: FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: BUILDING SEPARATION: SINGLE FAMILY 20' 20' 15' 5' INTERIOR 10' SIDE STREET MULTI - FAMILY 20' 35' 25' 20' INTERIOR 30' SIDE STREET SINGLE FAMILY: 10' SINGLE FAM. & DUPLEX: 20' OTHER DWELLINGS: 20' MINIMUM LOT SIZE: NIA MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT: 45'(3 STORIES) APARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ONE AND ONE -HALF (1.5) SPACES PER 1 BED- ROOM UNIT AND TWO (2.0) SPACES PER 2+ BEDROOM UNITS. PARKING REQUIRED: 378 SPACES 44 SPACES 124 -UNIT BUILDING = 176 30 SPACES/ 16 -UNIT BUILDING = 180 22 SPACES f 12 -UNIT BUILDING= 22 PARKING PROVIDED: 389 SPACES (INCLUDING ADAAND GARAGE SPACES) ADASPACES: 12 SPACES (12 REQUIRED) GARAGES: 63 SPACES 111�DMNcUN rTy 5r_1A�✓e \\n_T�r DoT 1�M l f'�f s TD f : 'f` ,1 L., Dr-,et� r-, , Y Arz_e- . SITE DATA (CONT'D) AMENITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS: SEC 81 -1: CLUBS, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ASSOCIATED USES: ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR SPACE. AMENITY CLUBHOUSE: +1- 1100 SF PARKING REQURED: 11 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 11 SPACES (INCLUDING ADA SPACES; PKG SHARED WI APARTMENTS) ADA SPACES: 1 SPACE DEDICATED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED PROVIDED 300 UNITS x.03 = 9.00 AC 9.00AC 11.78 AC (DEDICATED) PASSIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN ACTIVE OPEN SPACE: 4.50 AC 5.89 AC MIN COUNTY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF 0.03 ACRES PER DWELLING UNIT. 50% OF THE REQUIRED RECREATION SPACE SHALL BE PAS- SIVE AND THE OTHER 50% IS REQUIRED TO BE ACTIVE. Conceptual Site Plan A—% iL--1 , iw tIT_— er� -��rs rive 6 The Oaks at Murray Farm Porters Neck, North Carolina SITE DATA (CONT'D) SITE LIGHTING: 1. ALL STREETAND PARKING LIGHTING WILLBE DESIGNEDAND INSTALLED BY DUKE ENERGY. 2. ALL LIGHTING ON SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX, AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDER. 3. LIGHT FIXTURES TBD. GATE NOTES: 1. ALL GATES WILL BE EMERGENCY SERVICES ACCESSIBLE BY EITHER KNOX BOX OR SIREN ACTIVATION OR OTHERAPPROVED METHOD. SURVEY, UTILITIES, & FLOODPLAIN NOTES: 1. REFERENCE DEED BOOK INFORMATION PROVIDED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN. 2. UTILITES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM INFORMATION VISIBLE IN THE FIELD AND MAPS PRO VIDED BY OTHERS. UTILITIES OTHER THAN WHATARE SHOWN MAY EXIST. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 3. DEVELOPER WILL COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO RAISE OR BURY LOW POWER LINES AT OLD MARKET STREET ENTRANCE. 4. WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY CFPUA. 5. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE ENTIRELY LOCATED WITHIN A "ZONE X MINIMAL FLOOD RISK" AREAAS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 3720326000K, PANEL NO. 3260 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 28, 2018. SfN�L.� f;P-AMfL_y Lz7nn,, Dr -tMUN fj-y OPPOSITION MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 12 - 1 %f TM Inv 7 Ql Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 -- ITEM: 13-13-1 7� NEW HANOVER Co UNTY _ N'S u. PROJECT LOCATION i R ,'E F PC•BDDS PC -BDUS 1. AERIALS FROM NEW HANOVER COIIN7 . MOB W E S LEGEND - PAGES CREEK WATERSHED 2,560 S,PW SAVPLE LOCATIONS �Eeel 1 inch equals 5, DOD T Receiving Waters Pages Creek SA/HQW(High Quality Waters /recreational uses) Listed on EPA 303(d) list Impaired from high levels of bacteria pathogen Enterococci = Bacteria Pathogens Prohibited shellfish harvesting area Red - Closed Pink -Cond Closed Blue -Cond Open B and of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ** SA HQW designation from NC DWR Website, 303�d) list from Il�l�ygksit�, shellfish info from NC DMF. Benefits in controlling or limiting impervious surfaces (Low density development) • Protection of wetlands and aquatic ecosystems • Improved water quality of receiving waterebodies • Conservation of water resources • Protection of public health • Flood control Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 3 Potential Env. Results of Increased Density • Increased impervious surface results in increased run off carrying pollutants • Increased run off carries more polluntants down gradient • Increased density will result in more wet retention ponds thereby increasing discharge of pollutants down stream. Wet detention ponds ineffective for hydrocarbon (oil, gas, tire wear), fertilizer (nitrogen phosphorous), fecal coliform (bacteria pathogens) • Increased density will drive additional wetland impacts over lower density (wetlands are natural filters present on this tract). A lower density project can avoid on -site wetland impacts. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 4 Environmental Summary • Despite water quality permitting since the early 70s within this drainage area, the resultant effect is poor water quality within Pages Creek • By allowing higher than currently zoned density the approving body is further risking Pages Creek water quality • Citizens of New Hanover seek out natural resources most notably water based recreation and by changing zoning to allow for more density the approving body places those very resources in greater jeopardy • There are no guarantees low density will not have an affect to receiving waters but logic tells you by increasing density you unnecessarily risk the very natural resources that has attracted many to this region Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 5 Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection Details I Basemap About Content Legend Contents 0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection - 2014 -2018 I Topographic Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri Report Abuse . Contact Us iota [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519 Mod Share Print I Measure Find address or place fdtal Crash Category 40 to 49 Total Crashes 47.00 Fatal_A_Injury Crashes 0.00 B_C_Injury Crashes 13.00 PDO Crashes 34.00 County NEW HANOVER Route A US 17 Aid Route B SR 1351 LRS Route 20,0d /00. �a `38 LRS Milepost e Comments �,Ziocatiold tted on map Location Error NO ERAW >r 0 0 100ft d, Fls New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, US Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 6 Home o Total Crash Frequency By Intersection Details I Basemap About Content Legend Contents 0 Total Crash Frequency By Intersection - 2014 -2018 I Topographic Help . Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri Report Abuse . Contact Us iolta [Crash FrequencyBylntersection _2014_2018_021519 fdtal Crash Category 50 and above Total Crashes 104.00 Fatal_A_Injury Crashes 1.00 B_C_Injury Crashes 17.00 PDO Crashes 86.00 County NEW HANOVER Route A US 17 Route B SR 1402 LRS Route 20,000,017,100.00 LRS Milepost 14.43 Mod Share Print I Measure Find address or place Comments Location mileposted - ] op'e plotted on map Location Error NO ERROR 0 -----y0 1S Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 7 A C 'iL. New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USA Traffic Calming Assessment Vineyard Plantation New Hanover County, NC Fina� October 2019 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 8 Traffic Calming Assessment Vineyard Plantation New Hanover County, NC Prepared For: Premier Management Company P.O. Box 12051 Wilmington, NC 28405 (910) 443 -4847 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 272 N. Front Street, Suite 410 Wilmington, NC 28401 (910) 399 -5699 Project Manager: Zachary Bugg, PhD, PE Project Principal: Chris Tiesler, PE Project No. 22762 October 2019 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 9 ``1111111rrr/®s H CAR OF'ESS /p' <�2�� SE i 45 AL i .9 'tiGl NEE • ' ('j •��° cygRY.H. 'a�G �` ////1111110%\\ Ucf 31 Zb O Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary October 2019 Executive Summary 1 Findings........................................................................................................................................................ ............................... 1 Recommendations....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................................. ............................... 5 ProjectDescription ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5 ScopeOf The Report ..................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5 Data Collection and Summary ................................................................................. ..............................9 Description of Traffic Calming Measures ................................................................ .............................11 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement ..................................... .............................17 References............................................................................................................... .............................19 Board of Commissioners .7 June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13 -'Y3 - 10 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Data Collection Locations October 2019 Executive Summary 7 Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2) ............... .............................12 Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2) .............. .............................13 Figure 5. Recommended Speed Hump Placement 14 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- `Y3 - 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data October 2019 Executive Summary Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- i3 - 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment APPENDICES Appendix A Speed and Volume Data Appendix B MUTCD Speed Hump Signage and Pavement Markings Appendix C NCDOT Comments and Responses October 2019 Executive Summary I ZBoard of Commissioners 7 June 1, 2020 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. � ITEM: 13 -'13 - 13 Section 1 Executive Summary Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 14 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document summarizes vehicle speed and volume data and provides traffic calming recommendations for neighborhood roadways within the Vineyard Plantation community in New Hanover County, North Carolina, at the request of the homeowners association and Premier Management Company. The study area roadways are currently maintained by the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT)— accordingly, this study was performed per scoping discussions with NCDOT Division 3 staff and per NCDOT Division 3 Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices (Reference 1). The results of this study indicate 85th- percentile speeds on some neighborhood roadways are currently in excess of the posted speed limit and are documented along with recommendations below. FINDINGS Riesling Avenue ■ An average of 1,344 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 32 miles per hour (mph), more than 5 mph above the posted speed limit. ■ Approximately 4.4 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ An average of 412 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. ■ Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ An average of 424 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. • The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 24 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. • Less than one percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 43 - 15 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment Winery Way October 2019 Executive Summary ■ An average of 512 vehicles traveled the roadway during the seven -day study period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. ■ The 85th- percentile speed was calculated at 29 mph, and the posted speed limit is 25 mph. ■ Approximately 2.5 percent of vehicles exceeded the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph. RECOMMENDATIONS Riesling Avenue • Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway. • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the posted speed. Winery Way ■ Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- $3 - 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Executive Summary ■ Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- b - 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 2 Introduction Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 18 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Introduction INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Residents of the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood in New Hanover County, North Carolina have identified speeding on several neighborhood roadways that has created a potential safety and traffic noise issue. This document was prepared for the neighborhood homeowners association (HOA) and Premier Management Company in response to these concerns. Figure 1 displays the site vicinity map. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) staff visited the project area on May 8, 2018 and met with representatives from the HOA and Premier Management Company. Existing roadway widths, pavement markings, signage, parking, and traffic conditions were confirmed during this field visit. Additionally, HOA representatives identified areas with prior speeding issues and assisted with identifying locations for tube data collection (explained in more detail in the next section). Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map SCOPE OF THE REPORT The scope of this report was developed in accordance with NCDOT guidance and per discussions with NCDOT Division 3 staff at a formal scoping meeting held on August 15, 2019. Traffic speed and volume Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 9f3 - 19 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Introduction data were collected at the following locations within the Vineyard Plantation neighborhood at the direction of the HOA: • Riesling Avenue • Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way • Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive • Winery Way These roadways serve approximately 90 homes within Vineyard Plantation and are also used by residents outside Vineyard Plantation to access the homes between Jadewood Drive and Futch Creek Road. Additionally, the HOA identified Riesling Avenue as a popular shortcut between Futch Creek Road and Porters Neck Road as an alternative to the longer Champ Davis Road. The cross section of each of these roadways consists of two 10 -foot lanes with no curbs, bicycle lanes /paths, or sidewalks. The exact placement of the tube data collection locations along these roadways is displayed in Figure 2. This report is organized as follows: • Data collection and summary • Description of traffic calming measures • Recommended traffic calming measures and placement • Conclusion Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- f3 - 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. and Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment op t r OP fll. L i �Q 0A. * F 7 �- ,ri Data Collection Location KITTELSON Board of Commissioners & ASSOCIATES - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 21 October 2019 1-&_T » � 1 Data Collection Locations Figure Wilmington, NC 2 Section 3 Data Collection and Summary Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 22 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment DATA COLLECTION AND SUMMARY October 2019 Data Collection and Summary Traffic speed and volume data were collected at the study locations for the seven -day period from May 11 through May 17, 2018. Table 1 summarizes the speed and volume data, including the following elements: ■ Posted speed limit: the posted speed limit is 25 mph throughout the study area. ■ 85th- percentile speed: this is the speed at which 85 percent of vehicles travel at or below and is typically used as a rule -of -thumb for setting posted speed limits. ■ Percent of speeds above 35 mph: vehicles traveling at 10 mph or more above the posted speed limit. ■ Average daily traffic: the average number of vehicles per day over the seven -day data collection period. Table 1. Summary of Speed and Volume Data For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue: ■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or ■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit. As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit, while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Location Riesling Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 mph 85th-percentile Speed Percent of Speeds above 35 mph 32 mph 4.4 Average Daily Traffic 1,344 Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way 25 mph 29 mph <0.1 412 Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive 25 mph 24 mph 0.1 424 Winery Way 25 mph 29 mph 2.5 512 For purposes of this study, two events were used to identify a potential speeding issue: ■ An 85th- percentile speed at least 5 mph above the posted speed limit, or ■ A considerable amount of speeds at least 10 mph above the posted speed limit. As shown in Table 1, the 85t "- percentile speeds at all locations are within 5 mph of the posted speed limit, with the exception of Riesling Avenue, where the 85th- percentile speed is 32 mph. Less than one percent of speeds at the Chablis Way locations were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit, while 4.4 percent of speeds on Riesling Avenue and 2.5 percent of speeds on Winery Way were more than 10 mph above the posted speed limit. In summary, the speeds on Riesling Avenue indicate a speeding issue, and the speeds along Winery Way indicate a possible speeding issue. The speed data collected at the two count locations along Chablis Way do not indicate a speeding issue. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- Y3 - 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 4 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 24 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES A variety of treatments were considered to reduce speeds on these roadways: • Centerline and /or edge line pavement markings • Radar speed displays • Increased speed enforcement • Speed humps • Other traffic calming devices, including street closures, neighborhood traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and center island narrowing. These treatments are described in the following sections. Much of the information on these treatments is derived from Traffic Calming: State of the Practice, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE - Reference 2). Pavement Markings Edge lines can be used to visually narrow the roadway, even if the pavement width is unchanged. Additionally, a double - yellow centerline can be used in place of a single yellow centerline to narrow the effective lane width. While lane delineation has been shown to reduce single - vehicle crashes, speed reduction results are mixed —this is because drivers are potentially as equally likely to increase their speed with the added perception of safety given by lane delineation as they are to decrease their speed because of the more narrow lane width. We recommend referring to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for all pavement marking implementation (Reference 3). Pavement markings come in a range of costs varying from $0.50 to $2.00 per linear foot, with the more durable and retroreflective markings having a higher initial cost. While pavement markings on low - volume roadways like the subject roadways typically have a longer lifespan, the need to restripe every five to ten years makes this strategy potentially more expensive than other traffic calming measures. Because of the relatively high cost and low potential to decrease speeds, this treatment is not recommended. Radar Speed Displays The use of radar speed displays or "feedback" signage is a method to remind drivers that they are speeding and encourage compliance with the posted speed limit. These displays are typically mounted on a portable trailer equipped with radar speed detection and can be rotated to different roadways within the neighborhood (Figure 3). They can also be permanently installed on sign posts. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- �b - 25 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Figure 3. Portable Trailer- Mounted Radar Speed Display (Reference 2) Radar speed displays can be relatively inexpensive compared to other more permanent traffic calming measures, especially if the community already owns a trailer or other mounting device. While radar speed displays have been shown to decrease speeds while in place, their residual effect after being removed is negligible. The HOA should consider placing feedback signs on the study area roadways in combination with other traffic calming measures. Speed Enforcement Vineyard Plantation is under New Hanover County jurisdiction, but the size of the County and the relatively low traffic volume on the neighborhood roadways could make it challenging for public safety officials to enforce speeds on neighborhood roadways. Another option is for the HOA to take legal steps to potentially implement photo speed enforcement that would issue fines to violators. Like radar speed displays, photo speed enforcement units are typically portable to increase effectiveness and mitigate vandalism. Research has shown this strategy to be effective at reducing speeds both on enforced roadways and adjacent unenforced roadways due to the "halo" effect, whereby drivers change their behavior. Because of the high expense to deploy and operate a photo speed enforcement system, as well as the need to combat legal challenges, this strategy is usually only cost - effective on high - volume roadways where fees help offset maintenance expenses. Additionally, while the HOA could fine their own residents, it is unlikely the HOA could successfully fine visiting or "cut- through" drivers. If speeding issues on the study roadways persist, then we recommend the HOA explore the use of photo speed enforcement within the neighborhood. Speed Humps One of the most widely -used traffic calming measures, engineered speed humps are typically designed to be 12 to 14 feet in length, three to four inches in height, spaced at 300 to 600 feet apart, and comfortably negotiable at an 851h- percentile speed of 15 to 20 mph, per NCDOT guidelines Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13-'123 - 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures (Reference 1). It has become more common in practice to limit speed humps to 3.5 inches because taller speed bumps increase the probability of damage to the vehicle suspension. The 12 -foot length guarantees that a passenger vehicle cannot straddle the hump, thereby reducing the likelihood of bottoming out. The advantage of this treatment is its low cost — typically $500 to $1,000 per location — and self- enforcing design. Unlike speed bumps, which are more abrupt and are falling out of use, speed humps do not damage vehicle alignment or suspensions, nor do they cause much discomfort when negotiated at a proper speed. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has produced a recommended practice for the design of the 12 -foot speed hump (currently the only traffic calming device with a universally- accepted set of guidelines), and this is consistent with County regulations (References 3 and 4, respectively). Typically, speed humps feature a parabolic cross section (Figure 4) and are spaced 600 to 800 feet apart, depending on the area. Speed humps are more often applied as a "network- wide" measure to control speeds and less so in isolated situations. J 0.64 iM 1.75 2.22 2.64 3.W 3.31 3-58 3.75 3.89 3.97 4.00' if -- 4' Speed Hunt/ 0 156 1.07 15,3 1.94 2.31 2.63 2.89 3.11 3.28 3.40 3.48 3.50'+e 3.5' Spaed Fiume 0 0.48 0.92 131 1.67 1.% 2,25 2.46 287 281 292 298 3.00' ma X SPBW Hump Figure 4. Typical Parabolic Cross Section for Speed Hump (Reference 2) One potential disadvantage of speed humps is their permanence and the expense of removal if problems arise. Another critical consideration is that speed hump placement must be sensitive to areas such as driveways, fire hydrants, utilities, and drainage systems (in particular, near intersections). Most importantly, speed humps should be designed, signed, and marked so that they do not become a safety hazard —the MUTCD contains guidance for signing and marking speed humps (Reference 3). Figure 5 shows a concept layout for the potential placement of the speed humps (with consideration to spacing, driveways, intersections, and area context) on Riesling Avenue, where the highest 85th- percentile speeds were observed'. A total of three speed humps is recommended, spaced evenly (approximately every 300 feet) along Riesling Avenue between Chablis Way and Futch Creek Road. Speed humps should be appropriately signed and marked per the MUTCD —this guidance is contained in Appendix B. Additionally, NCDOT requires speed humps be placed at least 200 feet from intersections. 1 Note that this is purely a conceptual layout and is not intended to be used for design. The placement of each speed hump should be carefully considered individually to avoid the sensitive areas mentioned above. I� Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13 -1133 - 27 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment „ Z r I �� 1 1. - l / MW 4dw.,x]z' ., ": SCALE 0 200' 400' { t - Speed Hump r' A October 2019 Ili/Fl KITTELSON Board of Commissioners N & ASSOCIATES missioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 28 r Recommended Speed Hump Placement New Hanover County, North Carolina Figure 5 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Description of Traffic Calming Measures Other Traffic Calming Devices NCDOT Division 3 provides guidance on a number of other potential traffic calming devices, including street closures, neighborhood traffic circles, chicanes, chokers, speed tables, raised intersections, and center island narrowing. Each of these options were explored as potential solutions, but none are recommended for the study area roadways. Additional Traffic Control Devices Currently all of the intersections along the study area roadways are two -way stop controlled. While conversion to all -way stop control is not on the list of traffic calming measures suggested by ITE or NCDOT Division 3 guidelines, the HOA has requested consideration of this treatment as a method to deter cut - through traffic, including at the following intersections: ■ Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way ■ Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way ■ Winery Way /Peppermint Drive Note the MUTCD explicitly states that all -way stop signs should not be used for speed control but that it can be an applicable form of traffic control for two residential neighborhood collector streets of similar design and operating characteristics where traffic operations would be better than two -way stop control (Reference 3). From an examination of the tube count data summarized in this report, changing these intersections to all -way stop control is expected to cause minimal delays on the currently uncontrolled approaches. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13-t% - 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 5 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 30 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment October 2019 Recommended Traffic Calming Measures and Placement RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES AND PLACEMENT Riesling Avenue • Install raised speed humps at up to three locations along the roadway. • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Riesling Avenue /Chablis Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way east of Bella Sera Way ■ Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. ■ Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Chablis Way /Bella Sera Way intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Chablis Way west of Jadewood Drive ■ No treatments are recommended, as the measured 85th- percentile speed is less than the posted speed. Winery Way • Work with local police authorities to increase speed enforcement targeting vehicles traveling in excess of 5 -10 mph of the posted speed limit. • Consider the use of portable electronic speed feedback signs to make drivers aware of their speeds. • Consider the use of speed cameras to identify and fine residents who speed. Tickets or fines would not be enforceable to non - residents. • Pending NCDOT requirements, consider converting the Winery Way /Peppermint Drive intersection to all -way stop control to help deter cut - through traffic. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- �73 - 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Section 6 References Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 32 Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment REFERENCES NCDOT Division 3. Guidelines for Traffic Calming Devices. 2016. 2. Ewing, R. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 1999. October 2019 References 3. Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. USDOT: McLean, VA, 2009. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps and Speed Tables. Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washington, DC, 2011. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13-t% - 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. � KITTELSON �a &ASSOCIATES January 27, 2020 272 N FRONT STREET, SUITE 410 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 P 910.399.5570 RE: Vineyard Plantation — Vehicle Tube Count Data To Whom It May Concern, Project #: 22762 This letter provides supplemental explanation of vehicle tube count data collected in the Vineyard Plantation subdivision in the 7 -day period from May 11 -17, 2018. The subdivision consists of approximately 90 single - family homes. Per the Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment, submitted by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. and dated October 2019, the tube count data revealed the following average daily traffic volume on Vineyard Plantation streets: • Chablis Way (east of Bella Sera Way) — 412 vehicles /day • Chablis Way (west of Jadewood Dr.) — 424 vehicles /day • Winery Way — 512 vehicles /day • Riesling Avenue —1,344 vehicles /day The purpose of the Vineyard Plantation Traffic Calming Assessment was to provide traffic calming recommendations for neighborhood streets in Vineyard Plantation. Additionally, based on the magnitude of the daily volume tube count data collected, as well as reasonable assumptions premised on the size and location of the neighborhood, the data strongly suggest that some traffic from communities to the north and west of Vineyard Plantation uses the roadways listed above to reach the Shiraz Way /Porters Neck Road roundabout. Sincerely, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Zachary Bugg, PhD, PE Senior Engineer Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 13- 13 - 34 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 6/1/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ken Vafier, Planning Supervisor CONTACT(S): Ken Vafier and Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -03) - Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, HD, LLC, to Rezone Approximately 74.83 Acres of Land Located Near the 5800 Block of Carolina Beach Road, North of the Existing Tarin Woods Subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in Order to Develop 499 Dwelling Units (97 Single - Family Dwellings and 402 Townhomes) BRIEF SUMMARY: The area proposed to be rezoned is an extension of the existing Tarin Woods II subdivision, which currently has approval for 188 single - family lots. 118 lots have been platted, about half of which contain occupied homes. The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional district consisting of 499 dwelling units (97 single - family detached units and 402 townhome units) and a secondary amenity area at a density of 6.6 units per acre. In addition, the current proposal adds an additional point of egress directly to Carolina Beach Road. As currently zoned, R -15, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 187 dwelling units under the performance residential standards. 187 dwelling units are anticipated to generate 138 AM peak hour trips and 185 PM peak hour trips, which is an increase of approximately 115 AM peak hour trips and 118 PM peak hour trips more than if the site were to be developed under the existing R -15 district. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed in 2018 for a previous rezoning request, which studied the impacts of 531 total units being proposed at that time. Due to the change in scope and number of units from 531 to 499, the applicant's traffic engineer has produced a technical memorandum, dated February 4, 2020, to serve as an addendum to a previously approved TIA. The memorandum has been reviewed and approved by NCDOT, and with the inclusion of the additional access drive to Carolina Beach Road, recommends the installation of a northbound leftover /U -turn lane on Carolina Beach Road at the Harris Teeter driveway (required to be installed prior to 215 lots being platted) and the installation of a second westbound right turn lane on Manassas Drive at Carolina Beach Road. In addition to these improvements, the applicant is proposing the installation of a left hand turn lane to Shiloh Drive from Manassas Drive. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as General Residential with a small portion of the site classified as Urban Mixed Use. Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed with either place type, allowing site - specific features and evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered. The proposed R -5 conditional district is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node, it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas, where moderate to high density multi- family and higher intensity commercial is desired, to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14 The Planning Board recommended approval (6 -0) of the application, finding it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi- family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. The Board also found that recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node. The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1) The egress drive to Carolina Beach Road will be installed in an access easement through the adjacent B -2 zoned tract. 2) The maximum number of units within the proposed conditional zoning district will be capped at 499. 3) A 50' wide vegetated buffer shall be maintained on the 3 eastern sides of the Tregembo Zoo property. The existing vegetation shall remain within this buffer with the exception of clearing required for any essential site improvements, which include the driveway to Carolina Beach Road. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested amendment with the proposed and recommended conditions as stated in the Planning Board action and suggests the following motions: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to U rban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi- family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to U rban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi- family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. However, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with the proposed and recommended conditions as stated in the Planning Board action. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14 A motion to approve with the proposed and recommended conditions as stated in the Planning Board action failed 3 -2, Chair Olson- Boseman and Commissioners Barfield and Zapple voting in opposition. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14 SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z20 -03) Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct He a. b. C. d. e. wring, as follows: Staff presentation Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1) The egress drive to Carolina Beach Road will be installed in an access easement through the adjacent B -2 zoned tract. 2) The maximum number of units within the proposed conditional zoning district will be capped at 499. 3) A 50' wide vegetated buffer shall be maintained on the 3 eastern sides of the Tregembo Zoo property. The existing vegetation shall remain within this buffer with the exception of clearing required for any essential site improvements, which include the driveway to Carolina Beach Road. ExamRie Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. However, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] STAFF REPORT FOR Z20 -03 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z20 -03 Request: Zoning Map amendment to rezone 74.83 acres from R -1 5 to (CZD) R -5 Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions HD, LLC Location: Acreage: 5800 Block of Carolina Beach Road; 74.83 5900 Block of Shiloh Drive East PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: The PIDs are included in the applicant's materials. General Residential & Urban Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped 97 Single Family detached and 402 Single West Family attached units Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -15 (CZD) R -5 Existing Zoning -`" 4 &1 to P, MorTSVivaGE acos"o`s (CZD) B -2 e'YS r Sroaes, R-1 ' z� r U ,(CUD) -B- 116 y /G 116 N � G Z20 -03 Ztti. I•i'"eR¢�, +rte /il � ea,A!dP � �; ` : ,r � k 0 �m CHRiSTA. 0 /1,KIf S +-- `�1_> �� �4 a © Q G \ %Z '� - 3 RC7YF V A Sp1jps 10 1nnHnssas CtiE�C �1'`'v-Drk,., New Hanover County, PVC SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING Undeveloped, Institutional (Autumn Care of Myrtle North Grove), Commercial (Discount House), Single - Family R -15, (CZD) B -2 Residential East Single - Family Residential (Sentry Oaks) R -15 South Single - Family Residential (Tarin Woods, Battle Park, R -15 Covington) West General Commercial — Office, retail, warehousing, B -2 Tregembo Animal Park Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 1 Page 1 of 13 ZONING HISTORY April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R -15 (Area 4) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire Conservation District, New Hanover County Station Myrtle Grove Bellamy Elementary, Codington Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, Murray Schools Middle, and Ashley High schools For more information, see the full School statistics below. Recreation Myrtle Grove School Park, Monterey Heights, Veterans Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation resource maps indicate that pocosin wetlands may exist on the property. The property owner further evaluated the site during a previous Conservation preliminary plat application and delineated the areas which are subject to additional standards of the conservation resources. The preliminary plat review indicated that the proposed development is capable of complying with these standards. Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 2 Page 2 of 13 BACKGROUND, PROPOSED USE, AND CONCEPTUAL PLAN • The area proposed to be rezoned is an extension of the existing Tarin Woods II subdivision. This subdivision currently has approval for 188 single - family lots, 66 of which are located in the area proposed to be rezoned. 1 18 lots have been platted, about half of which contain occupied homes. • The current proposal is being submitted as a conditional district, limiting the development to that shown on the submitted conceptual plan. • In addition, the proposal adds an additional point of egress directly to Carolina Beach Road, and limits the maximum number of units to 499 at a density of 6.6 units per acre. • The application proposes 97 single family detached units and 402 single - family attached units consisting of duplexes, triplexes, and quadruplexes. The units are located on two separate tracts consisting of 74.83 acres. Tract 1 consists of 72.76 acres and is directly adjacent to the previously platted Tarin Woods II section, while Tract 2 consists of 2.07 acres and is located on the west side of Shiloh Road, just north of the intersection with Manassas Drive. �l liflfl■ � FINE- � 111}1 rr!� !!�#yram•�r 1f1 ,r. J ry rr� : 1I' •' ' . -q.� tr r l� Y# ;� �' +� , �r ► ■, + � � 11��1�tr�r�rnrrl�►*� M1 f illllit111�1ii►li� �� ■. r; *� / I.M. liiiiim- General 6, 7,061LIM .rDt Location of �r :.�a_i�. ►�� New Point of Area Proposed to be 66 lots with r4itAtlrfYHl' � � � . Approval _ AN �� ,,:tll►►lr Existing Area of $,'�i�t��;J:� �i�11111�� R., �11�iu ; ►t *n *,,► ►r► / *Iij�. 118 Platted Lots -. - ;• ��r'?°l • — `�f1 ICI *�I1►`! �,4 �� ��''� .��� ��i 1< �•: s'� � Imo. � � +� it +', � ' rat' �'ar'r� ►'r irr ►rr VII ■ �"� � 1 • The current zoning of the property (R -15) would allow up to 187 dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed (CZD) R -5 district would allow a total of 499 dwelling units at density of 6.6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning would allow a maximum increase of 312 units. • The R -15 and R -5 districts are both residential zoning districts. While the R -5 district permits more base density than the R -15 district, it prohibits mobile homes and typical multi - family development, like apartments, allowing a maximum of 4 units within any residential structure. In addition, the special use permit for high density developments is not permitted in the R -5 district, and the number of permitted nonresidential uses is reduced. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 3 Page 3 of 13 — - Boundary of l y Proposed Rezoning a ;yam P Request 1 i. ° Q I �r V4 F.Xl57fNG EXlSTfNG, w� d ®_•.dd. '�° j +� as TaR1N WOODS z TAKW WOODS 1 1 }} r, -,�� % -�J� '• • ?w - - it �. JJ } ... �: • yaj.l I I` > y;. �.. •T , OP _N aITL6v SRACL FJTURE 6ECONDARY Iii ; "1 � ° 4.., a� '� _ vr4 -I AVRNITYAREA �yy ��J y_ w;3 a+ w} , >p.C� • _ i• .�i V '•, _ 1v -�a-�� �-! �y ' ''911 I N �.� Y '� � [ T �• - CONNLCIIGN 0GAw0uVAHEACHHOAL 50' Buffer from J ,� �•�• • vlTregembo �+ , Animal Park° L w c4O< /N�BERR� ? I N° III MANASSASDRV IMPROVEMENTS,; C/ POSSIBLE FUTJR- CGNN C ON 6 LANOSCFIPFD BERM VW ADDITIONAL P 111TING ALONG PROPEFTY LINE L Egress Drive to Carolina Beach Road pp I I 1 RJGHT IN RIGHT OUT I • LEFT OVER Proposed Conceptual Plan F� Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 4 Page 4 of 13 R -15 (CZD) R -5 Proposal Min Lot Size (Conventional) 15,000 sf 5,000 sf Base Density (Performance) 2.5 du/ac 6.6 du/ac (187 total units) (499 total units) Additional Dwelling 10.2 du/ac (763 total units) N/A Allowance SUP Single- family, mobile home, Single- family, duplex, Permitted Housing Types duplex, townhomes, multi- triplex, quadruplex. family 20 uses w/ SUP (convenience stores, kennels, Nonresidential Uses camping) Secondary amenity area 15 uses by -right (wholesale nurseries, stables) Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 4 Page 4 of 13 TRANSPORTATION • The primary point of ingress and egress is provided to the subject property by Manassas Drive (SR 1581) which connects to Carolina Beach Road. The development also connects to the adjacent residential subdivisions of Battle Park, Covington and Tarin Woods by way of Shiloh Drive, Appomattox Drive, and Tarin Road. In addition, existing and future interconnectivity allows for access to Myrtle Grove Road through the Sentry Oaks subdivision and the proposed Congleton Farms subdivision. • An additional point of egress from the proposed development to Carolina Beach Road has been added to this revised plan. At this time, the NCDOT has advised that this connection will provide a right -out movement only due to safety issues caused by the proximity to the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and Sanders Road. The subject property also abuts Rosa Parks Lane, however, this road is not maintained by NCDOT and is unimproved adjacent to the subject site. • The property on which the egress to Carolina Beach Road is proposed to be located is currently zoned B -2, and future development of this property with a commercial use will potentially add a right -in (ingress only) from Carolina Beach Road. The applicant intends to design this site in a manner that will provide internal circulation to the right -out (egress only) on Carolina Beach Road. • A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the Tarin Woods II subdivision in 2018 which studied the impacts of 531 total units being proposed at that time, but the scope of the project has since been modified. • Due to the change in scope and number of units from 531 to 499, the applicant's traffic engineer has produced a technical memorandum, dated February 4, 2020, to serve as an addendum to the previously approved TIA. The memorandum has been reviewed and approved by NCDOT. 97 single - family dwelling units and 402 townhomes are expected to generate 253 AM peak hour and 303 PM peak hour trips. • As currently zoned, R -15, the subject site would be permitted a maximum of 187 dwelling units under the performance residential standards. 187 dwelling units are anticipated to generate 138 AM peak hour trips and 185 PM peak hour trips. • The net change from the potential trip generation if the site were to be developed under the existing R -15 district to the proposed (CZD) R -5 district shows an approximate increase of 1 15 AM peak hour trips and 1 1 8 PM peak hour trips. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 5 Page 5 of 13 Comparison of Potential Trip Generation Scenarios • With the inclusion of the new point of egress on Carolina Beach Road, the technical memorandum recommends the installation of a northbound leftover /U -turn lane on Carolina Beach Road at the Harris Teeter driveway (required to be installed prior to 215 lots being platted) and the installation of a second westbound right turn lane on Manassas Drive at Carolina Beach Road. In addition, the applicant is proposing the installation of a left hand turn lane to Shiloh Drive from Manassas Drive. Required Road Improvements shown in red, with approximate location additional egress shown in yellow. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 6 Page 6 of 13 Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips Existing Development: Undeveloped (74.83 acres) 0 AM / 0 PM Typical Development 187 single - family homes 138 AM / 185 PM under Current Zoning: Development under Proposed (CZD) R -5 97 single - family homes, 402 253 AM / 303 PM Zoning: townhomes Net Change under Proposed (CZD) R -5 - + 1 15 AM / +118 PM Zoning: • With the inclusion of the new point of egress on Carolina Beach Road, the technical memorandum recommends the installation of a northbound leftover /U -turn lane on Carolina Beach Road at the Harris Teeter driveway (required to be installed prior to 215 lots being platted) and the installation of a second westbound right turn lane on Manassas Drive at Carolina Beach Road. In addition, the applicant is proposing the installation of a left hand turn lane to Shiloh Drive from Manassas Drive. Required Road Improvements shown in red, with approximate location additional egress shown in yellow. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 6 Page 6 of 13 Narnrhv Plnnnarl Trrnncnnrfrnfinn Irrmnrnvamantc rnnrl Trr{ffir Imnnrt Annlwcac Traffic Impact Analyses Approved Under Review Under Draft f STIP Project � U -5790 Z20 -03 1 Mile Radius Kaylies Cove TIA Approved �= 1�ia +��� -' Wit, p • •• •• • :1sT C f= r r . -. ..- Update'--1141011 _ f _■ G TIA Approved 111 TIA Approved �' *� ` �' � � �! � �t/� Ili ♦ � r'f�I� � 411 � �'•� �� � r� -�� ' ♦,_ III � ��i illy! { 0.25 0.5 �i � :.. - � „��...: = -- - ` -�. aria___ lr ■r.� `�'''.�.. Nearby NC STIP Projects: • STIP Project U -5790 o Project to convert the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and College Road to a continuous flow intersection and widen a portion of Carolina Beach Road south of that intersection. Continuous flow intersections permit more efficient travel movements and help alleviate congestion by allowing more of the main street's traffic to move through the intersection. Bidding of the project is expected to occur in 2024. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 7 Page 7 of 13 Proposed Land Use /Intensity TIA Status Development • 14,830sf of Shopping Center 201 8 • 2022 Build Out Year 1. Tarin Woods II Phase 2B 1 ( )` • Addendum approved March (Includes Subject • 219 Single - Family Homes , 26 2020 6, 2 Site) • 398 Townhomes • 2020 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a northbound leftover/U-turn on Carolina Beach Road at the Harris Teeter driveway (required to be installed during the development of Phase 2A). • Installation of a second westbound right turn lane on Manassas Drive at Carolina Beach Road. • Includes additional point of egress to Carolina Beach Road Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Beau Rivage Update • Beau Rivage Townhomes Development Status: Development is under construction. 118 lots have been platted at this time, and remaining units are subject to approval of the conditional zoning request. 2. Habitat Restore • 20,320sf of Discount Store • Approved February 26, Building • 14,830sf of Shopping Center 201 8 • 2022 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a southbound right turn lane on Carolina Beach Road at the site's access. • Increasing the length of an existing southbound u -turn lane on Carolina Beach Road at Cathay Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Beau Rivage Update • Beau Rivage Townhomes Development Status: No construction has started at this time Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 8 Page 8 of 13 • Approved February 20, 3. Kaylies Cove • 1 10 Single - Family Homes 2018 • 2019 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a eastbound right turn lane and westbound left turn lane on Piner Road at the site's access. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 8 Page 8 of 13 Development Status: Homes under construction. 110 lots have been platted at this time, and both turn lanes have been installed. 4. Congleton Farms • 162 Single - Family Homes • Approved February 5, 2018 thru bank 9 2018 Build Out Date The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Constructing the section of Lieutenant Congleton Road along the site frontage to connect to the existing roadway with one lane in each direction. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: Under construction. 89 lots have been platted at this time. SCHOOLS Students generated from this development would be assigned to Bellamy Elementary and Ashley High schools. Students from the northern section of attached units would be assigned to Myrtle Grove Middle, while students from the remainder of the development would be assigned to Murray Middle. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 9 Page 9 of 13 • 4,500 square feet of drive - thru bank • 3,500 square feet of fast 5. Beau Rivage food drive thru • Approved December 28 2016 pp Update • 6,900 s feet of square • 2018 Build Out Date supermarket (addition to the existing Harris Teeter) • 7,500 square feet of shopping center The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of an eastbound right -turn lane on Sanders Road at the site's access and Carolina Beach Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Tarin Woods • River Lights Development Status: Under construction. The right -turn lane on Sanders Road at the site's access has been constructed. SCHOOLS Students generated from this development would be assigned to Bellamy Elementary and Ashley High schools. Students from the northern section of attached units would be assigned to Myrtle Grove Middle, while students from the remainder of the development would be assigned to Murray Middle. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 9 Page 9 of 13 • One hundred eighty -seven dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -15 zoning base density, and 499 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 312 dwelling units. • Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 74.8 (33.5 elementary, 1.9 middle, and 24.31 high) more students than if developed under existing zoning. *Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes students attending out -of- district specialty schools, such as year -round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTECH. School Enrollment* and Capacity * * - 2021 -2022 Estimates *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas. • Existence of wetlands will be verified during the development review process for the undeveloped portions of the site. • The property is within the Everett Creek (SA;HQW) and Motts Creek (C;Sw) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class III (severe limitation), and Class IV (unsuitable) soils, however, the site will be served by CFPUA water and sewer. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 13 Total Capacity of % of NHC % Enrollment of Assigned Capacity of Funded Level Capacity School Assigned School w/ Assigned Capacity School Portables School Upgrades Elementary 97% Bellamy 465 499 93% None Middle 107% Myrtle Grove 714 738 97% None Middle 107% Murray 899 848 106% None High 105% Ashley 1869 1776 105% None *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas. • Existence of wetlands will be verified during the development review process for the undeveloped portions of the site. • The property is within the Everett Creek (SA;HQW) and Motts Creek (C;Sw) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable /slight limitation), Class III (severe limitation), and Class IV (unsuitable) soils, however, the site will be served by CFPUA water and sewer. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 13 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. Specific goals of the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may be relevant for particular properties. Puce Types] EvlS ! s ` Ols�,• e. q a�,, r' ,naonwil�4 � ���Pr�•�� ` "i�1r:: a � C?{ -,+�.�'tro�X f JNn MOBS 3 q ,GaL.Ee�Nr. M ' ►i?GuRA� N�'CHAh+ri/O� h ' ! as,��' �. �K� s r o° YG U t�'aq 'o s'. + �o % �� gy ' �,• � ,►4 Anki �hm i� ''�► ,a� '`'0 �a° ` �e g 3f VILLAGE t�LG +i R JF V� 4�7- cv ; ° -+....,, •-�,� o 040 URBAN MIXED USE 1 �� rte. -.® M_` 4 ?sir a 5 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL '��� PIN Z20 -03 ��-. -s s�er,,ah.•, `���S�R,,M� .P m� ° m e" �y ✓r� s ij 4 � D x } }55 e zW �h- '•9 `�M ��es�n -,' {,Z� "may CONSERVATION +icec �MANASSAS r1l_.�."0' ' 1FN j�'idi.J �°' ��Y•,!` _. e.- Min Future Land Use Map Place Type General Residential & Urban Mixed Use The subject parcel is primarily General Residential, with roughly 2.5% designated as Urban Mixed Use. Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed with either place type, allowing site - specific features and evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered. General Residential: Focuses on lower- density housing (1 -6 du /ac) and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are Place Type encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single - family residential, low - Description density multi - family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. Urban Mixed Use: Promotes development of a mix of residential, office, and retail uses at higher densities. Types of uses encouraged include office, retail, mixed use, small recreation, commercial, institutional, single - family, and multi - family residential. The subject parcel is located between existing lower density residential neighborhoods and the Carolina Beach Road commercial corridor, which is envisioned for the most intensive place type, Urban Mixed Use. Analysis In general, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along roadways for higher residential densities and a mix of uses and those near existing neighborhoods as General Residential in order to allow for an orderly transition of densities and intensities. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 11 Page 11 of 13 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their March 5, 2020 meeting. Six members from the public spoke in opposition to the request, citing concerns related to density, traffic, and buffering from adjacent land uses. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application, finding it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. The Board also found that recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 12 Page 12 of 13 The proposed R -5 zoning, one of the new zoning tools adopted in 2019 to provide for the development patterns outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, would provide a transition in density and intensity between existing and future development along Carolina Beach Road, and the existing single family residential districts to the east. Providing a transition between mixed - use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential development is one of the stated intents of this districts. The R -5 district allows a range of single - family housing products, however, mobile homes and multi - family developments, such as traditional apartments, are not permitted in this district. The design for this development positions higher density attached units (two - unit, three -unit, and four -unit buildings) closest to the higher intensity Urban Mixed Use area with lower density single - family lots closest to existing neighborhoods. This type of development pattern provides an appropriate transition in density and aligns with the Comprehensive Plan's goal of providing for a range of housing types. In addition, the low- moderate density proposed (approximately 6.6 units per acre) is generally aligned with the 0 -6 units per acre density outlined for General Residential areas. (To compare, the next highest intensity place type, Community Mixed Use, provides for moderate densities around 8 units per acre.) The proposed R -5 conditional district is generally CONSISTENT with the intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in Consistency close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node, it provides for a range Recommendation of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas, where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired, to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their March 5, 2020 meeting. Six members from the public spoke in opposition to the request, citing concerns related to density, traffic, and buffering from adjacent land uses. The Planning Board recommended approval of the application, finding it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types, and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. The Board also found that recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the overall density of the project is in line with recommendations for a General Residential area in close proximity to an Urban Mixed Use growth node. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 12 Page 12 of 13 The Planning Board, with agreement of the applicant, included the following conditions: 1 ) The egress drive to Carolina Beach Road will be installed in an access easement through the adjacent B -2 zoned tract. 2) The maximum number of units within the new proposed conditional zoning district will be capped at 499. 3) A 50' wide vegetated buffer shall be maintained on the 3 eastern sides of the Tregembo Zoo property. The existing vegetation shall remain within this buffer with the exception of clearing required for any essential site improvements, which include the driveway to Carolina Beach Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the Planning Board's recommendation and recommends approval of the request with the recommended conditions. The proposal is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the General Residential and Community Mixed Use place types. The proposed overall density of the project is in line with recommendations of these place types, and the proposal provides for a range of housing types which will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for a range of housing types and it will transition densities from the portions of the property adjacent to Urban Mixed Use areas where moderate to high density multi - family and higher intensity commercial is desired to those abutting existing lower density residential neighborhoods. However, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z20 -03 Staff Report 6.1.2020 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 2 - 13 Page 13 of 13 Case: Site l • • Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: 5800 block . (CZD) + Carolina Beach + Undeveloped Single-Family i Townhomes Zoning Districts ♦ /�,► ,- a % Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) 1,000 C 07D See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Feet incorporated Areas SHOD Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning_ Z20 -03 5800 block R -15/ (CZD) R -5/ Carolina Beach Rd Undeveloped Single - Family & Townhomes 1s1LN Subject Site 0N;P'QJ U� wq ^I�=m U RBAN MIXED USE GENERAL yrr— RESIDENTIAL r a%alp $ �It1If��� ZONE now= ! ~ �= EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION � � 111 r''� err — ■'��►ir � Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z20 -03 5800 block R -15/ (CZD) R -5/ Carolina Beach Rd Undeveloped Single - Family & Townhomes N 5661 R -10 LEVIS LN--- • 5671 " 5673 &� Rpsg pq ��� Rkrt?v 1043 6100 5805 MY 1040 • 1051 ++ 61031-16101 4 6162 ' r / • 1 0 4 6 • 1055 1 6107 Q ~ 6106 t 5872 5723 5719 5793 1052 i 6110 • 17 Q ID R. -1 5 • • • 6114 5816 =' 11118 6115 !Q�} i' B -2 Subject Site --, -.1 z 25 6123 `6119�ti O ^'. 6127 ac - - Site GRAND _C H c� 61 zz � �•1 6< _7 '4N1PjpN RD 6126-61.30✓ - \ j 5801 ! 6135 • 6139 / ?� X5805 9167 \1' ^�A i 1111 • � � ��� � - ! 1116 59054: +15913 5929 5941 1103• .:j0�r• �';�• {� 11 5909 i• 5937 104 1992 5811 • 5809 5904 • = + 5920-"5933 ! 5949 6154 y� 5908 5924 • w r 5813 5811 j"' 5958 5957 • 5953 6162 -� se11 /f''I 11os�• 1121 � r�• ti' /]1*7'1'05831 6010 1169 �1y 11177 5 • 5961 _ • 1005 1017 1025 005 1116 59�� 6005 6202 •00 v -1 6013 • 1609lw 1029 11206008)1 I" 5 R� :835 1004 C 0 67r.6�2 10 8 f 6016! ,60 620 ��� SA�`yp�R 58e5 o08`10z496025 6020- 6028f6-625 6268 w" 6029 602,lfJ • 5919 6031 1115 �'6afJ3�12�j 03r 66p33 6212 5915 • 1124�7112'0� 6037 a 6041 10 r 5935 • 1101 1103 1 • 1108 1103 / �}�, 1P 5941 5939 6049 6061 • • 112171117 1107 59415933 ` 61 / 1109 1113 !� 1109 �- 5941 61041- 50 6109 1105 i 1113 1129. y1105 7\ Ln u.l 59411 59�49 1 5�94�• 5949 6054 6 46108-61113-11 04l11 1125 t� 2 } �� 5� 9491<� III 6716 6117. 6121 • 1108 5949 X949 i 5951 6124 '6120 -� r 11112 q Z 167 115 127-1 6125 ¢ _ Li.1 +o L► 1 a 6128 6132 i7 —ELGIN $r 103 111 119 Q 6140 6137 5985 15985-116 120 128 6278 6144 - 6149 614 • �I ®® j��j J��j 6141 6234 V 4 LJ✓� �LJ -L7� • 124 132 �_, 6152' -lf 1 6148 -6242 5965 511 519 527 535 X980 6153 AMBLE51f7E�DR --� I.� _I 543'6'"} -5982 62766272' 6241 cT p ❑ 515 X523 s31 539 f601 6285 6273 6257. ? �] am �fjJjt..jj MANASSAStDR� �547� 605 i6 z53 6245 �{ �l 520 x_7540_544 602 ,g'/6001- 62�6265 1001 �[$� •• 528 • •, 1 j x`-610- --6005 524 ��� � 548' k 6004 913 1005 532 536 •I 6010 I t • • 6009 6008 1,000 •0121'._6013 `sF Feet Boa of om n 20 �rRY py APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (910) 798 -7053 plan ningdevelopmenr.n hcg ov.c o m CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT Application Applicant/Agent Information Property Owner(s) If different than Applicant /Agent Name Owner Name CINDEE WOLF HD, LLC Company Owner Name 2 DESIGN SOLUTIONS Address Address PO BOX 7221 8620 RIVER ROAD City, State, Zip City, State, Zip WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 Phone Phone 910 -620 -2374 910- 443 -3060 (CONTACT: JAMES YOPP) Email Email CWOLF @LOBODEMAR.BIZ JAMES @ROCKFORDPARTNERS.NET Subject Property Information Address /Location REFERENCE ATTACHED LIST Parcel Identification Number(s) REFERENCE ATTACHED LIST Total Parcel(s) Acreage 74.83 Existing Zoning and Use(s) R -15 / VACANT Future Land Use Classification GENERAL RESIDENTIAL case Number - 'L 19 " 0 uarejime received: 21t, 120 1-L,), 7,,A Received by: n2 Page 3 of 7 Board of Commissioners -01A Pi`iilot�af "Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 14- 7 - 1 Rezoning Parcel List: NHCo PIN Owner Situs Address p/o 313306.49.7239 HD, LLC 5841 Carolina Beach Rd p/o 313307.38.8611 HD, LLC 5819 Carolina Beach Rd p/o 313307.58.6516 HD, LLC Ironwood Dr 313306.48.5058 HD, LLC Appomattox Dr 313310.37.8374 HD, LLC 5944 Shiloh Dr 313310.37.8481 HD, LLC 5940 Shiloh Dr 313310.37.8488 HD, LLC 5936 Shiloh Dr 313306.37.8588 HD, LLC 5930 Shiloh Dr 313306.37.8696 HD, LLC 5926 Shiloh Dr 313306.37.9704 HD, LLC 5922 Shiloh Dr 313306.48.0256 HD, LLC 5923 Carolina Beach Rd 313306.48.1270 HD, LLC 5901 Shiloh Dr 313306.48.1172 HD, LLC 5905 Shiloh Dr 313306.48.1063 HD, LLC 5909 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1966 HD, LLC 5913 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1857 HD, LLC 5917 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1749 HD, LLC 5921 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1742 HD, LLC 5925 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1643 HD, LLC 5929 Shiloh Dr 313306.47.1545 HD, LLC 5933 Shiloh Dr 313310.47.1427 HD, LLC 5937 Shiloh Dr 313310.47.1420 HD, LLC 5941 Shiloh Dr 313310.47.1312 HD, LLC 5945 Shiloh Dr Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 2 Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Cc nd iti a no I Zo n i ng D isirich (CZD) R-5 Total Acreage of Proposed District: 74.83AC. Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH A COMBINATION OF SINGLE - FAMILY, DUPLEX, TRIPLEX & QUADRIPLAX HOMES WITH ACCESSORY AMENITY AREA, RECREATION SPACES & STORMWATER FACILITIES Proposed Conditions) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictionson the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. REFERENCE ATTACHED EXHIBITS FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS LOCATIONS, GENERAL CIRCULATION PATTERNS & HOUSING STYLE AREAS. PROPOSED CONDITIONS: 1. EGRESS DRIVE TO CAROLINA BEACH ROAD TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH B -2 TRACT. 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY WITHIN THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT WILL BE CAPPED AT 499 UNITS. Page 4 of 7 Board of Commissioners CdhWi o1Jq?Aing District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 14- 7 - 3 Traffic Im pad Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. ATraffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use 97 SINGLE-FAMILY (210) & 402 RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME (230) Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): ..CALCULATED PER DWELLINGS AM Peak Hour Trips: ...73+177=250 PM Peak Hour Trips:. 97+209=306 ** TIA REVIEWED & APPROVED BY NCDOT ** CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistentwith the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) The policies for growth and development encourage safe and affordable housing to be available to every citizen. Sustainability of the County depends on sensible in -fill and maximizing use of lands already accessible to services. Allowing increased density on this property will improve the form and function of an underutilized site, maximize land use-,efficiency, and be a.good economic development opportunity. 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? The tract is identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as a General Residential place type. The plan suggests higher densities as an acceptable transition between the more intense commercial uses along the busy highway corridor and the more established single - family housing beyond the boundary of the tract. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? The areas surrounding the subject property have been developing with single- family housing over the past several years, but because of the need for a lift station, sanitary sewer service was not previously available to these lands. Inter - connectivity and sewer capacity now make rezoning this property for moderate - density residential development a more logical transition and a more efficient land use. Page 5 of 7 Board of Commissioners �rA- an�Pigning District Application -- Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 14- 7 - 4 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial ". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N /A ". Applications must be complete in order to process for further review. Required Information Applicant Staff Initial Initial 1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application. CAW 2 Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review). CAW J 3 Community meeting written summary. CAW 4 Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). CAW 5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page CAWJ reference of the property requested for rezoning. 6 Site Plan including the following elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. • Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non- residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. • Development schedule including proposed phasing. • Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets CAW VJ and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. • The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. • Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. • Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance. • Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change Ref. Article VII as applicable). 7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard CAW copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan. 8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. CAW i Page 6 of 7 Board of Commissioners -C`i H&i1n9H9ning District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 14- 7 - 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURES By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed lobe correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Acton my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this, application. JMAES YOPP HD, L.L.C. Signa re of Property s) Print Nome(s) �4 MA=� � , \'�,V DESIGN SOLUTIONS / CINDEE WOLF Signature of Agent Print Name NOTE: Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning websife will be required. .; rJ�et_ Page 7 of 7 Board of Commissioners &i NianaPigning District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 14- 7 - 6 iL Mi Legal Description for Conditional District Rezoning Tract #1 Beginning at a point in the eastern boundary of Shiloh Drive, said point being at the southwestern corner of "Lot 23" on a subdivision plat entitled "Battle Park - Section 6," recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 9, at Page 45; and running thence from the point of beginning: North 04 -32 -24 East, 951.67 feet to a point; thence South 77 -26 -57 West, 259.20 feet to a point; thence North 04 -32 -24 East, 219.23 feet to a point; thence North 74 -29 -22 East, 17.29 feet to a point; thence North 13 -49 -04 East, 405.92 feet to a point; thence South 65 -37 -26 East, 292.00 feet to a point; thence North 25 -41 -42 East, 450.02 feet to a point; thence North 65 -37 -58 West, 281.94 feet to a point; thence North 31 -08 -21 East, 439.77 feet to a point; thence South 82 -25 -07 East, 942.56 feet to a point; thence North 12 -22 -28 West, 163.99 feet to a point; thence North 17 -30 -29 East, 759.46 feet to a point; thence South 72 -29 -31 East, 864.60 feet to a point; thence South 09 -57 -39 West, 1353.18 feet to a point; thence North 80 -02 -21 West, 137.92 feet to a point; thence North 09 -57 -29 East, 73.35 feet to a point; thence North 80 -04 -01 West, 180.00 feet to a point; thence North 08 -58 -14 East, 313.07 feet to a point; thence North 80 -02 -30 West, 190.00 feet to a point; thence North 79 -54 -19 West, 460.40 feet to a point; thence South 10 -38 -19 West, 32.78 feet to a point; thence South 05 -51 -32 West, 66.27 feet to a point; thence South 10 -00 -08 West, 51.31 feet to a point; thence South 01 -58 -57 East, 69.86 feet to a point; thence South 07 -57 -19 East, 30.17 feet to a point thence South 01 -28 -03 East, 35.53 feet to a point; thence North 68 -06 -05 West, 25.89 feet to a point; thence South 21 -53 -55 West, 30.00 feet to a point; thence South 68 -06 -05 East, 39.45 feet to a point; thence South 42 -45 -53 East, 15.50 feet to a point; thence South 37 -36 -19 East, 11.26 feet to a point; thence South 50 -13 -49 West, 188.58 feet to a point; thence South 39 -46 -11 East, 149.44 feet to a point; thence South 50 -13 -49 West, 45.00 feet to a point; thence South 39 -46 -11 East, 65.00 feet to a point; thence South 50 -13 -49 West, 120.00 feet to a point; thence North 39 -46 -11 West, 50.00 feet to a point; thence South 55 -02 -27 West, 59.10 feet to a point; thence South 21 -35 -17 West, 129.57 feet to a point; thence South 01 -28 -12 East, 44.26 feet to a point; thence Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 8 (Continued Legal Description Tract #1) South 11 -01 -50 West, 180.38 feet to a point; thence South 08 -24 -13 West, 95.14 feet to a point; thence South 03 -42 -34 East, 34.88 feet to a point; thence South 40 -14 -22 West, 108.17 feet to a point; thence North 62 -19 -40 West, 45.81 feet to a point; thence Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 25.00 feet and Length of 42.68 feet a Chord of South 63 -00 -01 West, 37.68 feet to a point; thence South 19 -38 -43 West, 45.03 feet to a point; thence Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 25.00 feet and Length of 39.91 feet a Chord of South 23 -30 -53 East, 35.10 feet to a point; thence South 21 -04 -02 West, 43.16 feet to a point; thence North 63 -36 -55 West, 6.63 feet to a point; thence North 85 -21 -52 West, 139.13 feet to a point; thence North 04 -34 -17 East, 75.04 feet to a point; thence North 86 -50 -34 West, 167.72 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 72.76 acres more or less. Trait #7• Beginning at a point in the western boundary of Shiloh Drive; said point being at the southeastern corner of "Lot 1" on a subdivision plat entitled "Battle Park — Section 6," recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 9, at Page 45; and running thence from the point of beginning: North 81 -25 West, 187.75 feet to a point; thence North 08 -32 East, 480.00 feet to a point; thence South 81 -25 East, 187.75 feet to a point; thence South 08 -32 West, 480.00 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 2.07 acres more or less. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 9 Project Name: Proposed Zoning REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Tarin Woods II R -15 to (CZD) R -5 The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on January 17, 2020 . A copy of the written notice and list of recipients is attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Thursday, January 30, 2020, 6:00 p.m.; Best Western Plus — Wilmington, 5600 Carolina Beach Road The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign -in List The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A description was given of the proposed rezoning petition and about the Conditional Zoning District process. Questions were taken. Primary concerns were over traffic — specifically current and future trips via Manassas Drive. A secondary egress has been coordinated with NCDOT for a driveway onto Carolina Beach Road just south of the Tregembo zoo property boundary. Other opportunities for inter - connectivity are being actively pursued, but are not available at this time. The signalization improvements already installed at the Manassas intersection with Carolina Beach Road. Future improvements include an additional right -turn lane on Manassas. Major opposition is over any development other than single- family homes. It was explained that the existing zoning does not control the possibility for multi - family buildings, but the proposal would limit housing styles to single, duplex, triplex or quadriplex homes. The meeting was brought to a close with the note that we intended to submit the rezoning petition for the March Planning Board agenda and that notice would be given for all hearings. As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: _ The attached - housina areas of the clan have been oriented in locations that are more transitional between the commercial corridor of Carolina Beach Road and the higher- density housing sections. The petition includes a proposed density less than the maximum that could be permitted in the R -5 district. Date: February 5. 2020 Applicant: By: Design Solutions Cindee Wolf Boara ot Commissioners - June 1, ITEM: 14- 7 - 10 Community Information Meeting Tarin Woods II Thursday, January 30, 2020 Name Address Email (Optional) we +�Y` 2 �t" ff - ss ��7 �tMc ss m , Cu J c 11 G 13 %.et �� 1 163 pve>c.C>2�1� �; ,F1J h! N�tuaral� 6703 � R,�ao� *--, xA L fic A)) C) Y) vi e x�,� 2 a CLA `tee e s L..'Q t /NG c� .52 T� ,-v,a ll co /✓ `�'�J Jli'✓%�/`! fwd!? ��rd�'�s 4.Y ��f'l� yr�i'l%/� /� ! '��,5� e+�`i° °.. Cindee Wolf I Project Planner cwolf @lobodemar.biz Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 11 G I QJ Community Information Meeting Tarin Woods II Thursday, January 30, 2020 Name Address Email (optional) 7-Ovr3r, rvA e4,n {3 r V- 4Hr45llAw HiLH- a�fft?t+L )16-D -rHjr:�,- KiNt.S &ar w, L.af �,, cEo.►�6: b 6 C ate$ c�ir� sfi'�,►. 1 W jjA 7,,6, PL L-7 CV L.7 T L�b y r f OL �415c( -C c�(?S L�'� qY��. x. QCfr 13Z Y---4 t? " f � .Z GC, /�✓A /f /GG� Dr { v� Lc4 Jom��c (0 170 l ORAXtcJ VVItLWV 6110 51-11tQy 73Xrl -4 00 L fS A wzt. c m t, 174 x?wr c ��A � (0-(, 'I)Y. gem �0� c' �MA" 1. 0 w ;dgid IdArk- Y� u Nc w Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 12 7" VI O IA Ln rrl V4 at V1 N 0 rj -4 LM VI O 0000 U) 00 Lill r14 Ln z LU z 00 C) j= 00 w to ,-I x Ln 0 z CO < d- 0 V) TA (D Pj [D > tj iii ell iD r,j N I S9 IV iq Iv :Y1 z sTM ez, 00 CIA x S: O ti A Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14-7- 13 IA w rrl V4 at V1 N 0 (A LM Lei L1. 1( U el -4 > till A V1 IN .Lj ri U, z v -,::- 7j _Z_ tit til A j N Ld a U1 0 IA X 1, 4 0000 U) 00 Lill r14 Ln z LU z 00 C) j= 00 w to ,-I x Ln 0 z CO < d- 0 V) TA (D Pj [D > tj iii ell iD r,j N I S9 IV iq Iv :Y1 z sTM ez, 00 CIA x S: O ti A Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14-7- 13 w V4 at V1 N 0 (A LM el -4 V1 IN .Lj r4 U10 tit til A j N LD a U1 0 rj f-j ca jil C1 N 7-- z f 4 >- U jTP ::3 cc 00 111 C14 X CL C) U z I 0 cr Ln Z LU Z 0 jtic <J U Z U Ll 0 cf co l IM :01 INI M vA QL O fy 71 i� I I O ci V, 0. S: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 14 ell It, P.J try I•A ri ra U I 111 - MY it 1 cl.: 0 r lU. UA (k: W LLI CC < cl Iij 3K 21- to or it] ILI 'r 0 "1 0 44 :Z: ra 0 0 U PI I M 4'1 IIn I'j tJ 4.1 z CiI: Ilk, -3 h. is I 1-4 INA x, 1-4 1-4 IA- 1 III 0 iSa 00 h. 4 rj Z Ey kit LU Rt j th U 00 U) < (N LU U N >- —A Z its 0 z Z> -.-r V) zj 2 0 0 (D < U Ln Ifi U k.0 Ln Efi Irl til Ira IfiS wOl INA srt is h. nl trl RBI fy 71 i� I I O ci V, 0. S: Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 14 elD 11) I•A ri 93 U I MY it 1 cl.: 0 r lU. UA c" ti I it U PI I M :- < I'j tJ 4.1 z CiI: 1-4 INA x, I- IA- 0 00 h. 4 Z Ey kit LU Et E I Z LIJ 0 0 U C:) U Q fi >- —A Z its Z> 04 ZOO IsP IsJ Pe Ira IfiS INA srt ge +1i ,.;. fn V=p W lqt 00 rV CV i o In m LiJ Z AID rj � m ~ O F- rf r-1 L Z r4 LLJ -j = J dD N a O z .` 1 gr kA j k "_ °13 zU.I[71_ h a rI to to ri �. r-I n hl '� 9 to +1i ,.;. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 15 fn V=p W lqt 00 rV CV -] o In '`9 LiJ Z AID a � m ~ O F- 0 J cc J L Z LLJ -j = J f'V O N LL a O Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 15 LM W It o In to -s r+ o ID � m 0 s a O Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 15 2 o 0 U.1 rl N 'r4 Cc 73 rj r, 00 to CD rA r a- a — z I LU Lr) LLJ 0 } -t to C) Ch ~ U N V) 2 LLJ ? L7 A cc Z C-i < 00,7: < ia CD I " Ul rg D 3c N LL 44 -7, 1 V ml > r4 Ul J• Z A tu X U z (D 2 o 0 U.1 rl N 'r4 Cc 73 rj r, 00 A CD LID jil r a- a — z a • LU Lr) LLJ 0 } -t to C) 7A jr ~ U rj V) 2 LLJ ? ID < cc Z C-i < < Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 16 13 0 i jlElf LN w I T 13 A 70 ■ ■ 97M -mm ■ 42113 ■ E3 13" ■ -77 p7l Arm x ADJACENT OWNER LIST MCAULEY FAMILY TRUST 300 CRAIG ST S CHESTERFIELD, SC 29709 543 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON BRYANT JOEL L AMY H 8385 NC 581 HWY S BAILEY, NC 27807 527 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 6236 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6132 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 1104 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON LANDMARK DEVELOPERS INC PO BOX 4127 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON DELACOURTJOHN S JENNIFER T 1109 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1109 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON MCCLOSKEY JEAN LOUISE 6121 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6121 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON MILLS IRENE 5801 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5801 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5831 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HASSELL W W SR LIFE ESTATE 3796 ASHLEY PHOSPHATE RD CHARLESTON, SC 29418 1052 ROSA PARKS LN WILMINGTON FARRINGTON ALFRED L SHIRLEY E 6208 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6208 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON BREWER LARRY JO ANN 602 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 602 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON CHANCE TIMOTHY JEAN 6009 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28406 6009TARINRD WILMINGTON MCAULEY FAMILY TRUST 300 CRAIG ST S CHESTERFIELD, SC 29709 535 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6221 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON MILLER CROFT NATASHA IRENE 536 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 536 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON KALOGIROS ATHANASIOS IOANNIS ETAL 6010 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 544 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1120 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON LAWRENCE HEIDI E 1129 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1129 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 6204 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON A & K PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 15148 WILMINGTON, NC 28408 5800 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5902 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON ROSS VONZENIA A 925 SEABREEZE RD N WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1051 ROSA PARKS LN WILMINGTON WILLIS JOHN R DERINDA FAYE 532 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 532 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 6225 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON BRANCH GABRIEL N ETAL 1009 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1009 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON SWARTZ MICHAEL E ETAL 724 PILOTS RIDGE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5933 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5933 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 1121 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 1125 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON WAUGH CHRISTOPHER ETAL 6130 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6130 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON DEBROSKEY WILLIAM E KAREN E 6124 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6124 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON HALES BRIAN E HANNAH M 809 RIDDICK CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 809 RIDDICK CT WILMINGTON DEBROSKEY DAVID P 1013 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1013 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON ALL STOR CAROLINA BEACH LLC 5200 DTC PKWY STE 200 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 5719 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6117 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1112 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON YINGLING COREY 0 6114 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6114 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON TARIN WOODS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN INC 1612 MILITARY CUTOFF RD #1108 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 913 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON WINDHAM GRADY J CAROLYN T 7520 MASONBORO SOUND RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 524 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON ARTHUR ERNEST S 1R PO BOX 1688 SWANSBORO, NC 28584 5675 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6137 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON NAEF TRUST 6162 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6162 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON GAMESTER LANCE D II HEATHER M 1137 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1137 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5936 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5937 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON SALWIERZ HENRY J 1124 LT CONGELTON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 1124 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5940 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON TULLAR ROBERT N SHEILA Y 1004 LT. CONGLETON DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1004 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON TAYLOR JEREMY R TERESA B 1121 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1121 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON MYRTLE GROVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 800 PINER RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1150 KINGS DR WILMINGTON COFFIN MILES CJORDAN G 6135 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6135 TARIN RD WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 1105 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 400 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 6125 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5905 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON DOBRECKI FAMILY TRUST 1103 LINKWAY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1103 LINKWAY LN WILMINGTON TREGEMBO SHERRY ETAL 5813 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5817 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON BROCK CHRISTOPHER J KATHRYN S 6115 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6115 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON FLEMING PAUL JENNI 1111 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1111 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON VERMASNEH 6139 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6139TARINRD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6109 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HAISLEY DANIEL MARIA R 1117 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1117 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON THANOS DANNY B MARIA A 1809 HOBBS RD GREENSBORO, NC 27410 610 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON KUJAWSKI MICHAEL PAMELA H 6120 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6120 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON GARNER NORMA 1111 LINKWAY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1111 LINKWAY LN WILMINGTON HAWKSWORTH JOSEPH M HANNAH R 805 RIDDICK CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 805 RIDDICK CT WILMINGTON BREWER LARRY JOANN 602 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6013 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC 2020 CHURCHILL DR S WILMINGTON, NC 28403 5806 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5929 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON HALL JOHN E MEGAN K 1105 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1105 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 18 RABON AUSTIN T MELISSA L 1104 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1104 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON FOWLER MINA E 1222 HILL ST WILMINGTON, NC 28403 5801 BROWN PELICAN LN WILMINGTON LONG LOYCE F 609 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 605 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON NIXON KEVIN LYNNE 6021 CULDEES LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6021 CULDEES LN WILMINGTON KIEVITT DREW A ETAL 1120 PEMBROKE JONES DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 6110 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON MCAULEY FAMILY TRUST 300 CRAIG ST S CHESTERFIELD, SC 29709 547 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5910 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON BOWENS CHAPEL AME ZION CHURCH 2730 WORTH DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 5822 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON CHARLES BRADLEY M HANNELORE M 6113 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6113 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON E 85 TRANSPORT LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1200 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON TREGEMBO ROBERT D ETAL 5811 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5815 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON JAMES GEORGE RODERICK 828 SAINT ANDREWS DR APT 0 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5667 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON STRICKLAND ELIZABETH RUPERT B 1107 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1107 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON BOWENS CHAPEL 2730 WORTH DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 5826 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON THOMPSON MITCHEAL 0 LOGAN W 6106 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6106 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON FRANKLIN SEAN A LISA M 6143 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6143 TARIN RD WILMINGTON OLDHAM GREGORY A LORI D 1112 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1112 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON SHERMAN CLAUDIA ETAL 1125 LTCONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1125 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON ROBINSON ANDREW PJOYELLE L 6000 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6000TARIN RD WILMINGTON MASTERSON ALLEN L LYNN C PO BOX 156 KURE BEACH, NC 28449 1046 ROSA PARKS LN WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC 107 STOKELY DR #102 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 6228 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON JONES ROBERT M ANGELA A 6326 GRANBY ST WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6326 GRANBY ST WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 6129 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 6229 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON LANDMARK DEVELOPERS INC PO BOX 4127 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5925 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON BREWER LARRY JOANN 602 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6009 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5914 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON LUDGATE TIMOTHY J EDITH J 6170 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6170 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON SUPERIOR CENTER LLC PO BOX 15256 WILMINGTON, NC 28408 5951 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6209 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6217 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON COASTAL CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL 1332 JOHNS CREEK RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1150 KINGS RD WILMINGTON KURTZ HEATHER E 6154 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6154 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 1141 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON PERSON ELISA A 515 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 515 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON BOWERS BRANDON STRACIE PO BOX 2848 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501 6131TARIN RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5841 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 5918 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON KOWALSKI JAMES D KELLI RENA 6125 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6125 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 6220 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON COOK TERRY WESLEY 1001 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1001 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON FARRINGTON ELIZABETH ANNE 6204 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6204 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON LEWIS BRYCE A SAMANTHA A 1117 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1117 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5941 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON NIELSEN CHARLES W PATRICIAJ 1136 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1136 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5926 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON WATTS CARRIE 6131 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6131 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 6233 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON BUXTON RUSSELL V JENNIFER A 6001 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 6001TARINRD WILMINGTON FARMER JAMES MICHELLE 6005 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6005 TARIN RD WILMINGTON E 85 TRANSPORT LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5935 APPOMATTOX DR WILMINGTON FLORENCE WILFRID FORTUNATA 6016 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6016 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5917 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON WILLIAMSON J C 609 FINER RD #181 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5661 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 6128 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5909 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON BROWN WILLIS CATHERINE 6200 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6200 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON S & P COMMERCIAL PROP LLC PO BOX 15660 WILMINGTON, NC 28408 5905 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON MEYERS MARY JANE 6111 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6111 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6234 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6145 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6232 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON LIVERMAN JANELLE TRUST 601 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 601 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON DEVONE LEON JR JOSEPHINE C 1132 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1132 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 6212 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5913 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 6113 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD RALEIGH, NC 27614 1129 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 1124 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5917 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON BANKSON KIMBERLY 1005 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 1005 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON COBLE CHRISTOPHER RAY 6118 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6118 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 19 HOOSIER DADDY LLC PETERSON ROBERT PATRICIA HAHN STRONG TODD D SARA A STANLEY ANDREW LATONIA M IZZO ANTHONY H HOLLY L STEVENS MALCOLM G CAROL A BREWER LARRY JO ANN CAFE CORP TREGEMBO ROBERT DEE RITA GIANCARLO LLC AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC STEFFENS THOMAS J SANDRA LONG WILLIAM ARDELL JR HRS HUGHES STEVEN R BARBARA A NIXON KATIE CARNELL ETAL HOOSIER DADDY LLC MARAPOTI JAMES A BARBARA D HOOSIER DADDY LLC GREGORY GILL L ELLEN P CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT KALOGIROS KONSTANTINOS ETAL SENTRY OAKS HOA INC RADECSKY JOHN VIVIAN A HARDISON BUILDING INC HALL MATTHEW J KIMBERLY W HENRY WILLIAM E MARY G BROOKS GEORGE S PATRICIA K GARRIS KENNETH R LESLIE M HOOSIER DADDY LLC CARTER ERIC J JENNIFER E BEAUDOIN MICHAEL P GAYLE D HOOSIER DADDY LLC TROUTMAN GREGORY JESSICA HOOSIER DADDY LLC JOHNSON MELVIN ETAL HOOSIER DADDY LLC HOOSIER DADDY LLC ROBISON BILL WESLEY HOOSIER DADDY LLC SENTRY OAKS HOA INC FARROW MELISSA M JAMES H CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT WILLIAMS JOSEPH MILDRED M CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT SPRINGER CRAIG B LYNN W ARTHUR ERNEST S JR PUCKETT KEITH A BARBARA ROSS VONZENIA A MUNROE LISA G MICHAEL A CAVINESS & CATES BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT PERRY JOSHUA A STEPHANIE B STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC PRITCHARD HERMAN S HOOSIER DADDY LLC HOOSIER DADDY LLC VAN NOTE SCOTT SUZANNE MUNGO THOMAS H JACQUELYN E AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC WYLUBSKI ADAM L ANGELA M HOLT LYNDON K BTRETTANY S TREGEMBO ROBERT D ANDROS JACK W LAUREL B HOBBS SHARON ELIZABETH HARDISON BUILDING INC HOOSIER DADDY LLC HOOSIER DADDY LLC BAUM LINDA MARY E MCGOLDRICK BURNETT WILLIAM JAMES DAVID M JAMIE B ALL STOR CAROLINA BEACH LLC IVES WILLIAM P MICHELLE L HOOSIER DADDY LLC PHIFER WALTER LUISE CROTT RAYMOND C MARGARET 6025 TARIN RD 528 MANASSAS DR 6108 AMBLESIDE DR 801 RIDDICK CT 6127 LYDDEN RD 6103 LYDDEN RD 602 MANASSAS DR 801 ARNOLD AVE STE 1L 1332 HILL VALLEY WLK 6806 FINIAN DR 12917 DURANT RD 407 VICTOR HUGO DR 609 MANASSAS DR 6126 LYDDEN RD 5671 CAROLINA BEACH RD 6025 TARIN RD 269 CREEDMOOR RD 6025 TARIN RD 6109 AMBLESIDE DR 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C 6010 SHILOH DR PO BOX 4127 6001 APPOMATTOX DR PO BOX 809 1037 LT CONGLETON RD 730 PELHAM RD UNIT 1C 6116 AMBLESIDE DR 6013 CHANCELLORSVILLE DR 6025 TARIN RD 1115 OVERLAND CT 6212 LYDDEN RD 6025 TARIN RD 1112 LT CONGLETON RD 6025 TARIN RD 901 QUEEN ST 6025 TARIN RD 6025 TARIN RD 5805 BROWN PELICAN UN 6025 TARIN RD PO BOX 4127 1104 LT CONGLETON RD 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C 1921 RIVERSIDE DR 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C 6318 GRANBY ST PO BOX 1688 519 MANASSAS DR 925 SEABREEZE RD N 6107 LYDDEN RD 639 EXECUTIVE PL STE 40C 6122 LYDDEN RD 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD 1103 OVERLAND CT 6025 TARIN RD 6025 TARIN RD 1107 LINKWAY UN 1106 LINKWAY UN 12917 DURANT RD 6134 TARIN RD 548 MANASSAS DR 1332 HILL VALLEY WALK 6013 CULDEES LANE 540 MANASSAS DR PO BOX 809 6025 TARIN RD 6025 TARIN RD 6117 AMBLESIDE DR 1008 LT CONGLETON RD 6119 LYDDEN RD 5200 DTC PKWY STE 200 608 BREWSTER UN 6025 TARI N RD 1128 LT CONGLETON RD 6017 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 POINT PLEASANT BEACH, NJ 08742 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 RALEIGH, NC 27614 CARY, NC 27511 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10805 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 08401 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 SWANSBORO, NC 28584 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 RALEIGH, NC 27614 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 20 6141 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 528 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 6108 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 801 RIDDICK CT WILMINGTON 6127 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6103 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6014 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 5900 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 5813 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 5953 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 1128 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 6128 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 609 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 6126 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 5671 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 5945 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 1108 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON 5922 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 6109 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 6124 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 6010 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 6101 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6001 APPOMATTOX DR WILMINGTON 6205 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 1037 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 1043 ROSA PARKS UN WILMINGTON 6116 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 6013 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON 5944 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 1115 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON 6212 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 5921 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 1112 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 1136 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 1040 ROSA PARKS UN WILMINGTON 5901 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 1132 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 5805 BROWN PELICAN UN WILMINGTON 6121 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 6100 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 1104 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 1113 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 5647 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 6133 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 6318GRANBYST WILMINGTON 5675 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 519 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 1055 ROSA PARKS UN WILMINGTON 6107 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6149 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 6122 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 1103 OVERLAND CT WILMINGTON 5923 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 6105 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 1107 LINKWAY LN WILMINGTON 1106 LINKWAY UN WILMINGTON 1137 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 6134TARIN RD WILMINGTON 548 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 5811 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 6013 CULDEES LN WILMINGTON 540 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 6224 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 1116 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 1109 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 6117 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 1008 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 6119 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 5885 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 6314GRANBYST WILMINGTON 5930 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON 1128 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 6017 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON HUDSON COLE M CATHERINE O 6005 APPOMATTOX DR SENTRY OAKS HOA INC PO BOX 4127 HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD KIRCHDOERFER RICHARD G ALICE J 8 GRAPEVINE LANE ALSTON THOMAS NAPOLEON JR 6020 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR JC WILLIAMSON 5659 CAROLINA BEACH RD MCAULEY FAMILY TRUST 300 CRAIG ST S MILLS IRENE S 5801 CAROLINA BEACH RD SEYMOUR JUSTIN ANGELA 1133 LT CONGLETON RD MYERS LINDA K ISAAC D JR 149 WOODBURY RD LAYMON CHAD ELIZABETH 1113 LT CONGLETON RD GEORGE LARRY D KAY H 606 MANASSAS DR FLURY STEVE EDWIN TERESA MARIE 6206 LYDDEN RD OHM STEPHEN P BRITTNI A 6123 LYDDEN RD STRICKLAND'S 3 LLC 5915 CAROLINA BEACH RD AMERICAN HOMESMITH LLC 12917 DURANT RD BRYANT AMY HIGH JOEL L 8395 HWY 581 S LOBBESTAEL DOUGLAS KEITH JESSICA 6310 GRANBY ST OHI ASSET NC WILMINGTON LLC 303 INTERNATIONAL CIR STE 200 CRAMER REBECCA L MICHAEL B 703 LIBERTY LANDING WAY SIEBOLD DAVID S AMELIA C 6202 LYDDEN RD MCCULLEY JILL A 6102 LYDDEN RD HARDISON BUILDING INC PO BOX 809 STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION PO BOX 26807 BUTTS RICHARD E LOIS J 6112 AMBLESIDE DR KEYSER LESLIE A NADYA R 523 MANASSAS DR ADDERLEY LEESCOTT P ETAL 707 LIBERTY LANDING WAY MCGOWAN MARVIN R III AMY L 6216 LYDDEN RD SMITH TIMOTHY B THERESA S 1108 CANOPY WAY HOOSIER DADDY LLC 6025 TARIN RD BEAKES JEREMY D SARAH S 1116 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61704 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 CHESTERFIELD, SC 29709 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 EDISON, NJ 08820 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 RALEIGH, NC 27614 BAILEY, NC 27807 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 HUNT VALLEY, MD 21030 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC 28480 RALEIGH, NC 27611 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 21 6005 APPOMATTOX DR WILMINGTON 6162 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6216 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 6147TARIN RD WILMINGTON 6020 CHAN CELLO RSVILLE DR WILMINGTON 5659 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 539 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 5805 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 1133 LT CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 6322GRANBYST WILMINGTON 1113 LTCONGLETON RD WILMINGTON 606 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 6206 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6123 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 5906SHILOHDR WILMINGTON 6208 SWEET GUM DR WILMINGTON 531 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 6310GRANBYST WILMINGTON 5725 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 703 LIBERTY LANDING WAY WILMINGTON 6202 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 6102 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 1133 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 5830 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON 6112 AMBLESIDE DR WILMINGTON 523 MANASSAS DR WILMINGTON 707 LIBERTY LANDING WAY WILMINGTON 6216 LYDDEN RD WILMINGTON 1108 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 1140 CANOPY WAY WILMINGTON 1116 LTCONGLETON RD WILMINGTON Des,7 0 utio s Notice of Meeting January 17, 2020 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: Tarin Woods II The Tarin Woods II developer has spent a great deal of time in the past several months working with professionals on a masterplan, alternatives for traffic circulation and identifying housing styles to best accommodate the growth in this section of the County. We will be submitting a Conditional District rezoning petition to allow additional residential density in an area deemed appropriate for it by the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Approval of a Conditional District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with a specific plan, standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. The proposal will restrict future development to single - family lots, duplexes, triplexes, and /or quadri -plex buildings. There are no multi - family structures on the plan. The layout will also provide an alternative egress to Carolina Beach Road, north of Sanders Road. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. A meeting will be held on Thursday, January 30th, at the Best Western Plus — Wilmington, 5600 Carolina Beach Road, 6:00 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910- 620 -2374, or email cwolf @lobodemar.biz with comments and /or questions. We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. P.D. 130x 7221, WilwkiKgtovt, NC 2.8406 * Telepkone: 910 -62-0 -2374 * Email: CW01F @1obodevvt6tr.biz Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 7 - 22 TARIN WOODS, R -5 ZONING LIMITS / man ,2 - I 13,1 ��- s-�- -- 1 —�r - - -- - =�!0 �— �,. s7 9fi' ca s>1 71 � O 11 / 10 i I ss EXISTING ��� — I 74 �+ o r TARIN WOODS 2 3 I r v{ y 0 96 76 77 78 79 80 81 FUTURE 95 82 ■ ISECONDARY ' AMENITY 94 83 AREA 93 64 Is r 92 / / / / J EGRESS CONNECTION TO CAROLINA BEACH ROAD (CONDITION OF R -5 ZONING) TA1\1N D 40iiiiiiiiiiii� "olllliiiii� D S Wilmington, NC - . una 1 AM ITEM: 14- 7 - 23 / CONNECTION TO MYRTLE GROVE ROAD /-TARIN WOODS COMMUNITY BOUNDARY � \ N n 0 o3 CD \ J� \ o d- \ EXISTING C::1 N N N / N T RIN WOODS - N " N D EXISTING 7, COMMUMTY CLUBHOUSE AND \ AMENffY SPACE \ \ rr 11111111! • RIGHT IN ' • RIGHT OUT • LEFT -OVER r MANASSAS DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, (SEE ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2) NORTH SCALE: 1" = 200' 0 100 200 400 L.1 JOB #101.540 FEBRUARY 05, 2020 V Z V V LLJ V) b Z O Z Q CL MANASSAS DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS (CONDITIONS OF R -5 ZONING) i Q L<u m 7 Jy J ENTRANCE TO TARIN WOODS 2, ENTRANCE TO TARIN WOODS 2, SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ► PROPOSED WIDENING OF MANASSAS DRIVE PROPOSE SEEDING 10' -0" OFF EDGE OF ROAD, FOR (2) RIGHT -OUT LANES TYPICAL FOR BOTH SIDES ♦ ♦ . • • w . • .. • .Y • . Y . • '• ; • . �� ��� . • • • +..••.�•YA• �.••wwiR ���.w� M ••• -•�•M �•.• . a ^•IMYWIW • .. aMW9MYlf ai .�•. n ♦ - ♦ i . , . r f A. '."wrw r • • ,ryy- • . •. it �- MANASSAS - DRIVE - - - - - - - EXISTING B -2 ZONING EGRESS CONNECTION TO CAROLINA BEACH ROAD (CONDITIONS OF R -5 ZONING) INGRESS TO B -2 ZONING PARKING LOT ITEM: 14- 7 - 24 NORTH 01 oC Liu m Q z 0 ce 1 R 3 PROPOSE LIVE OAKS AT EDGES OF MEDIANS WITH FLOWERING SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER, TYPICAL I in PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES WITH SHRUBS INBETWEEN LIVE OAKS, TYPICAL M LEFT TURN LANE TO BE ADDED M M Wilmington, NC LLJ > Z C ENTRANCE TO TARIN WOODS 1, >,< SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 70 PROPOSED STREET TREES ALONG EGRESS PROPOSED CONNECTION FROM TARIN WOODS 2 TO B -2 ZONING CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SCALE: 1"= 50' 0 25 50 100 L'2 JOB #101.540 FEBRUARY 05, 2020 V Z 2 V U W U Z 01" Q V Z Z Q CL _, «•STATEn yd ,w m N0� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR December 16, 2019 James Yopp Hoosier Daddy, LLC 6025 Tarin Road Wilmington, NC 28409 Subject: Tarin Woods — Access to US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) Dear Sir: JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY We have received the additional traffic analysis prepared by DAVENPORT and a conceptual layout prepared by CSD Engineering related to a proposed egress road to US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) to serve the Tarin Woods development. The proposed egress road is located approximately 350 + /- feet north of SR 1187 (Sanders Road). Based on our review of the provided information, the proposed egress road provides an alternate route for exiting site traffic of the development and a benefit to traffic due to the increased connectivity. Therefore, NCDOT is in agreement with allowing a driveway connection for an egress road to US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) for the Tarin Woods development via the driveway permit process. In addition, NCDOT is agreeable in concept with permitting a right -in only driveway to access the commercial property fronting US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) in this area. In general, the right -in only driveway would need to serve the commercial property only and not provide direct ingress to the residential portion of the development. When a more detailed site plan of the commercial property is available, NCDOT can provide further review and comments on the proposed right -in only driveway for the commercial property. Sincerely, Benjamin T. Hughes, P.E. District Engineer BTH /dre ec: Brad Schuler, Current Planner, New Hanover County State ofNorth C� "C 110 of Transportation I Division 3, District 3 Boar varWjZ,1W0 Wi§ ro,�, 8U?020 Customer Service: (877) 368 -4968 TW9141 - www.ncdot.gov V� / / NOTES 1. 25,050 SF OF LEASABLE SPACE SHOWN 2 121 PARKING SPACES SHOWN 18 ♦ 12 \ ♦ / 11 \ ♦ 35 X 150 O ♦ ♦ / 30 X 120 (D7 O / 0 30 X 80 30 15 0 30 60 90 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET. 1 "= 30' ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ CSD ENGINEERING LICENSE # C -2710 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL P.O. BOX 4041 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 (910) 791-4441 Q z �o �Q z� o� �O zz O J ~ Qz wo U O o w N �_ N Q v m °z rn U � J � 00 J p N a� n o _qua � E E a� =a a a`= = H U rn Z y W W q�c w� oaa� U � _ a V � 3 O _ O O M U �cz o ozz"' w~z � o`n� i 2 °� rn w 0 �y � O J O '— U N o N U uMI r Q z �o �Q z� o� �O zz O J ~ Qz wo U O o w N �_ N Q v m °z rn U � J � 00 J p N a� n o _qua � E E a� =a a a`= = H U rn Z y W W q�c w� oaa� U � _ a V � 3 O _ O O M U �cz o ozz"' w~z � o`n� i 2 °� rn w 0 �y DATE.• 12 -16 -19 HORZ. SCALE.- 1 " = 30' VERT. SCALE. • N/A DRAWN BY- RL W CHECKED B Y.• HSR PROJECT NO.: 06 -0134 Sheet No. 1 Of Q 0 m or Q w or 0 z w DATE.• 12 -16 -19 HORZ. SCALE.- 1 " = 30' VERT. SCALE. • N/A DRAWN BY- RL W CHECKED B Y.• HSR PROJECT NO.: 06 -0134 Sheet No. 1 Of (:D) DAVENPORT February 24, 2020 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Tarin Woods II New Hanover County, NC Prepared for Hoosier Daddy, LL F///, xZmX /rr 0 DAVENPORT Technical Memorandum Tarin Woods II New Hanover County, NC Prepared for Hoosier Daddy, LLC February 24, 2020 Analysis by: Tou Lee, El Drafting /Graphics by: Tou Lee, El Reviewed by: Robert Gev, PE Timothy Lowe, PE Sealed by: Robert Gev, PE S 049553 / \\ 0SERT K. G� /24/z 4M % to ot This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post- consumer content. All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is � 100% recyclable. 1 o 1 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard. Suite E Winston - Salem. NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636: Fax: 336.458.9377 BoafNbvf 06r�)Mi % %ldrV5m -3Jb 4 §81932020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 2 �4) DAVENPORT Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum DAVENPORT Project Number 160278 Prepared for Hoosier Daddy, LLC February 24, 2020 Introduction The intention of this technical memorandum is to provide revised results for Phase 2B(1) from the originally submitted addendum dated October 2, 2018. This analysis will include an additional egress for the development onto Carolina Beach Road north of Sanders Road. The proposed land use size will be adjusted appropriately to demonstrate the number of units that will be able to be supported by the already approved improvements on Manassas Drive and the additional proposed egress on Carolina Beach Road. Since the proposed land use size is between the Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B submitted in the TIA, this new /additional phase will be labeled Phase 2B(2). Both revised and additional phase build year were assumed to be 2020. The new distribution for Phase 2B(2) used is similar to that of Phase 2B(1) with a change to add traffic flow to the additional egress. Trip Generation Trips for Phase 2B(1) were projected using TripGen10 software, based on the 10th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 1 presents the results. 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 3 Table 1 - ITE Trip Generation Tarin Woods II - New Full Build Phase 2B(1) Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak PM Peak Two -Way Hour Hour ITE Method - Land Use Land Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Type Code Single Family 210 219 Dwelling Adjacent/ 2,139 40 120 136 80 Detached Housing Units Equation Townhomes 220 398 Dwelling Adjacent/ 2964 41 136 127 75 Units Equation Phase 213(1) Total Trips 5,103 81 256 263 155 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 3 i DAVENPORT Trips for Phase 2B(2) with the additional egress were projected using TripGen10 software, based on the 10' edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 2 presents the results. Trip Distribution Site trips for Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B(2) were distributed based on the previously approved Phase 2B(1) distribution, with a small change to add traffic flow to the additional egress in Phase 2B(2). Distribution for Phase 2B(1) is shown in Figure Al and distribution for Phase 2B(2) is shown in Figure A2, and the directional distributions for site trips are as follows: • 75% to and from the north on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) • 20% to and from the south on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) • 5% to and from the west on Sanders Road 2020 Phase 2113(1) Total Traffic The 2020 Phase 2B(1) total traffic volumes were obtained by summing 2020 future no build volumes (Figure B) and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips are shown in Figure C. The 2020 Phase 2B(1) build volumes are shown for the AM and PM peaks in Figure D. 2020 Phase 2113(2) Total Traffic The 2020 Phase 2B(2) total traffic volumes were obtained by summing 2020 future no build volumes (Figure B) and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips are shown in Figure E. The 2020 Phase 2B(2) build volumes are shown for the AM and PM peaks in Figure F. 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 4 Table 2 - ITE Trip Generation Tarin Woods II - New Full Build Phase 2B(2) Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak PM Peak Two -Way Hour Hour ITE Method - Land Use Land Size Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Type Code Single Family 210 219 Dwelling Adjacent/ 2,139 40 120 136 80 Detached Housing Units Equation Townhomes 220 458 Dwelling Adjacent/ 3417 47 156 144 85 Units Equation Phase 213(2) Total Trips 5,556 F 87 276 :0 Trip Distribution Site trips for Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B(2) were distributed based on the previously approved Phase 2B(1) distribution, with a small change to add traffic flow to the additional egress in Phase 2B(2). Distribution for Phase 2B(1) is shown in Figure Al and distribution for Phase 2B(2) is shown in Figure A2, and the directional distributions for site trips are as follows: • 75% to and from the north on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) • 20% to and from the south on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) • 5% to and from the west on Sanders Road 2020 Phase 2113(1) Total Traffic The 2020 Phase 2B(1) total traffic volumes were obtained by summing 2020 future no build volumes (Figure B) and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips are shown in Figure C. The 2020 Phase 2B(1) build volumes are shown for the AM and PM peaks in Figure D. 2020 Phase 2113(2) Total Traffic The 2020 Phase 2B(2) total traffic volumes were obtained by summing 2020 future no build volumes (Figure B) and site trips due to the proposed development. Site trips are shown in Figure E. The 2020 Phase 2B(2) build volumes are shown for the AM and PM peaks in Figure F. 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 4 0 DAVENPORT Discussion of Results The following section discusses the Phase 2B(1) Build and Phase 2B(2) Build level of service for each intersection. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Sanders Road This signalized intersection is expected to operate at LOS D in both the AM and PM peaks in 2020 future no build conditions. In 2020 Phase 2B(1) build conditions, it is expected to operate at LOS D in the AM peak and LOS E in the PM peak. In 2020 Phase 2B(2) build conditions, LOS is expected to remain unchanged. While LOS E is not ideal, this delay increase is within the 25% increase permitted by the congestion management guidelines. This site is mostly adding through traffic to the signal and is not expected to critically increase delay and queueing at the intersection. Additionally, the traffic model included fully protected phasing for the northbound and southbound left turns as required by congestion management standards, which generates conservative analysis results. Therefore, with Phase 2B(1) recommendations in place, no additional imDrovements are needed in Phase 2B(2). 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 5 Approach Table 3 - US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Sanders Road Level of Service by (Delay in sec/veh) Wq bqund, Northbound Southbound L T R AM Peak L Hour T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Future D (42 2) F F E E E E F C C E C A No Build 97.9 99.9 60.8 67.5 67.5 67.5 287.3 22.0 22.0 72.3 22.1 3.5 F (90.7) E (67.5) D (44.8) B (18.5) 2020 Phase L T R L T R LU T R LU T R F F E L61.1 E E E F C C E C A 213(1) Future D (38.1) Build + 97.9 99.9 67.5 67.5 67.5 180.4 25.5 25.5 72.3 23.0 3.5 Improvements F (90.7) E (67.5) C (34.9) B (19.4) L T R L T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Phase F F E E E E F C C E C A 213(2) Future D (37.0) (97.9) 99 9 61.4 67.5 67.5 67.5 159.8 24.5 24.5 72.3 23.3 3.6 Build F (90.7) E (67.5) C (32.4) B (19.6) L T R PM Peak L Hour T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Future D (48.1) F F E E E E F B B E D A No Build 192.2 198.9 75.2 70.3 70.3 70.3 136.1 14.3 14.3 78.3 37.7 3.9 F (174.7) E (70.3) C (24.4) C (32.9) 2020 Phase L T R L T R LU T R LU T R F F E L80.1 E E E F B B F E A 213(1) Future E (58.5) Build + 192.2 198.9 70.3 70.3 70.3 103.3 16.4 16.4 89.4 62.4 3.2 Improvements F (173.1) E (70.3) C (21.4) D (54.3) L T R L T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Phase F F E L80.1 E E E F B B F E A 26(2) Future E (60.1) 192.2 198.9 70.3 70.3 70.3 99.8 16.6 16.6 89.2 65.2 3.2 Build F (173.1) E (70.3) C (21.3) E (56.6) 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 5 0 DAVENPORT US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Manassas Drive This signalized intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hours in 2020 future no build conditions. In 2020 Phase 213(1) Build conditions with improvements, LOS C is expected in the AM peak and LOS B in the PM peak. In 2020 Phase 2B(2) Build conditions with the additional egress, LOS is expected to remain unchanged. Therefore, with Phase 2B(1) recommendations in place, no additional improvements are recommended for Phase 2B(2). 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 6 Table 4 - US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Manassas Drive Scenario •I ����e�stbound it Northbound'% Southbound AM Peak Hour L R L R LU T R LU T R 2020 Future No g (16.6) C D C B A C A A Build 30.7 50.5 32.9 13.0 4.3 30.5 3.1 2.5 t(O. ) t(5O.5) N /A* N /A* 2020 Phase L R L R LU T R LU T R C D C B A E C A A 213(1) Future C (23.3) Build + 30.7 43.2 32.9 18.5 5.6 (29.7) (3.2 2.5 Improvements C (30.7) D (43.2) N /A* N /A* L T R L T LU T R LU T R 2020 Phase C L38.9 C B A C A A 2B(2) Future C (21.1) Build 30.7 32.9 17.0 5.5 31.2 3.2 2.5 C (30.7) D (38.9) N /A* N /A* L T R PM Peak Hour L T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Future No g (11.3) C C D A A C B A Build 30.8 31.6 38.9 7.1 4.8 31.6 12.0 2.7 C (30.8) C (31.6) N /A* N /A* 2020 Phase L T R L T R LU T R LU T R C C D E14.2 A C B A 26(1) Future g (17 4) Build + 30.8 22.0 38.9 9.8 26.1 11.8 2.7 Improvements C (30.8) C (24.1) N /A* N /A* L T R L T R LU T R LU T R 2020 Phase C C D B B C B A 2B(2) Future B (17.1) 30.8 20.9 38.9 14.5 10.0 24.4 11.7 2.7 Build C (30.8) C (20.9) N /A* N /A* *Due to Synchro modeling practices for superstreets, which requires 2 separate nodes, the approach LOS can not be provided 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 6 0 DAVENPORT US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Autumn Care Nursing Home This unsignalized intersection is expected to operate at LOS C in both the AM and PM peaks in 2020 future no build conditions. In 2020 Phase 2B(1) build conditions, it is expected to operate at LOS D in the AM peak and LOS C in the PM peak. In 2020 Phase 213(2) build conditions, LOS is expected to remain unchanged. While a drop in LOS is not ideal, this delay increase is within the 25% increase permitted by the congestion management guidelines. This site is mostly adding through traffic to the intersection and is not expected to critically increase delay and queueing at the U- turns. Therefore. no imDrovements are recommended for either Dhase. Scenario Table 5 - US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Autumn Care Nursing Home Delay in sec/veh) Northbound Southbound U T R LU T R AM Peak Hour L T R 2020 Future No C (23.8) WB C E (39.7) A (0.0) A (0.0) A F (60.3) Build Approach 23 8 0.0 C (23.8) A (0.0) A (1.0) L T R U T R LU T R 2020 Phase 213(1) D (27.3) Future Build + WB =27.3 E (43.8) A (0.0) A (0.0) F (89.1) A Improvements Approach D (27.3) A (0.0) A (1.4) T R U T R LU T R 2020 Phase 2B(2) D (2 WB B D OiD F (57.0) A (0.0) A (0.0) F (92.5) A Future Build Approach 27 6 0.0 (27.6) 1 A (0.6) A (1.4) PM Peak Hour L T R U T R LU T R 2020 Future No C (19.6) WB C 0 iC(l F (176.2) A (0.0) A (0.0) D A Build Approach 19.6 34.1 0.0 9.6) A (1.0) A (0.3) L R T U T R LU T R 2020 Phase 2B(1) C (21.4) Future Build + WB 21 4 F (283.6) A (0.0) A (0.0) 4E9 O Approach Improvements C (21.4) A (1.5) A (0.3) L T R U T R LU T R 2020 Phase 2B(2) C (21.5) WB C L iC 0 F (515.3) A (0.0) A (0.0) E A Future Build Approach 21.5 42.4 0.0 (21.5) B (6.5) A (0.3) 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 7 0 DAVENPORT US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Harris Teeter Driveway This unsignalized intersection is expected to operate at LOS C during the AM peak and LOS D during the PM peak in 2020 Phase 2B(1) Build conditions with improvements. In 2020 Phase 2B(2) Build conditions, the LOS is expected to remain unchanged. Therefore, with Phase 2B(l) recommendations in place, no additional improvements are recommended for Phase 213(2). 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 8 Table 6 - US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Harris Teeter Access ewe a e y Approach Scenario LOS of Worst - (Delay in sec /veh) # Approach Northbound Southbound IF Eastbound AM Peak Hour 2020 Phase 2B(l) C Future Build EB Approach • 1 1 1 1 Improvements 2020 Phase 2B(2) • Future Build EB Approach PM Peak Hour 2020 Future Build EB, Approach 1' ®® 11 1 1 Improvements Future Build EB, Approach 1 11 1 1 1 ` � 1 "Due to Synchro modeling practices for superstreets, which requires 2 separate nodes, the approach LOS can not be provided 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 8 0 DAVENPORT US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (Egress Only) This site access is proposed to be stop - controlled egress only access. In 2020 Phase 2B(2), LOS is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak and LOS C during the PM peak. While LOS E is not ideal, this is typical for stop - controlled movements entering a major roadway such as US 421. The delay is expected to be short -lived and no queuing issues are expected based upon the analysis results. Therefore, it is recommended to design the site access according to NCDOT standards. 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 7 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 9 DAVENPORT -01 Queue Results Table 8 below shows the queue results for all exclusive turn lanes during the Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B(2) Build scenarios. The table below also shows the queue lengths for Phase 2B(1) if the additional egress was built without additional land uses. Figure G shows the recommended improvements. Scenario US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Sanders Road Table 8 - Queue Results AM Peak Hour Queues US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Manassas Drive US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Harris Teeter Access US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (Right -Out) 2020 Future No Build EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 625 34 82 72 29 85 27 92 259 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 483 221 349 52 84 52 9 72 5 28 168 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 550 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL 2020 Phase 26(1) Build + Improvements EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 299 97 350 72 41 170 17 58 226 74 0 22 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 483 226 267 52 84 52 16 115 5 28 197 127 0 1 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL 2020 Phase 213(1) Build + Improvements with RO EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 166 44 133 72 60 124 28 58 199 69 0 23 159 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 483 226 244 52 86 52 16 115 5 28 144 99 0 1 12 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL FULL 2020 Phase 2B(2) Build EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 140 307 307 170 80 172 60 79 208 116 0 26 221 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 483 226 244 52 86 52 16 119 5 28 150 104 0 1 14 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL FULL 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II - Technical Memorandum 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 10 D V E NPO RT Scenario US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Sanders Road PM Peak Hour Queues US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Manassas Drive US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Harris Teeter Access US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (Right -Out) 2020 Future No Build EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 212 325 350 78 74 108 30 118 148 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 508 166 259 61 97 120 15 109 7 49 76 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 550 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL 2020 Phase 2B(1) Build + Improvements EBL, BR NBLU BR NBLU NBR SBUI, SRR EBR W .. SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 141 275 350 88 66 184 43 78 203 109 0 26 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 508 188 173 42 64 120 48 255 7 49 78 221 0 2 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL 2020 Phase 26(1) Build + Improvements with RO EBL EB&I NBLU SBILU I SBR, NaW NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue( 400 275 124 268 307 116 65 172 42 101 114 81 0 22 86 95th Percentile Queue (ft 508 188 157 61 98 120 48 225 7 49 64 184 0 2 9 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL FULL 2020 Phase 2B(2) Build EBL EBR NBLU SBLU SBR NBLU NBR SBLU SBR EBR WBR NBLU SBR EBR WBR Max Queue (ft) 400 275 145 306 307 108 66 177 43 83 144 71 0 26 87 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 508 188 154 42 64 120 50 232 7 49 67 191 0 2 10 Storage Bay (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 350 100 400 175 FULL FULL + 225 250 N/A FULL FULL 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 11 i DAVENPORT Summary and Conclusion The intention of this addendum revision is to provide revised results for Phase 2B(1) from the originally submitted addendum dated October 2, 2018. This analysis will include an additional egress for the development onto Carolina Beach Road north of Sanders Road. The proposed land use size was adjusted appropriately to demonstrate the number of units that will be able to be supported by the already approved improvements on Manassas Drive and the additional egress on Carolina Beach Road. Since the proposed land use size is between the Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B submitted in the TIA, this new /additional phase will be labeled Phase 2B(2). Both revised and additional phase build year were assumed to be 2020. The new distribution for Phase 2B(2) used is similar to that of Phase 2B(1) with a change to add traffic flow to the additional egress. Based on the analysis, with the approved improvements in place, Phase 213(1) will support up to 219 single family homes and 398 townhomes for a total of 617 dwelling units. By providing the proposed egress, an additional 60 dwelling units of townhomes can be sustained within Phase 2 of the development. Therefore, with Phase 2B(1) recommendations in place, no additional improvements are needed to accommodate Phase 2B(2). In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of both background traffic along with the Phase 2B(1) and Phase 2B(2) development traffic, and has determined that with the recommended improvements in place that there will be adequate capacity to accommodate future traffic. Please note that all accesses to the site are required to be constructed to NCDOT standards. 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 10 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 12 0 DAVENPORT APPENDIX 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum 11 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 13 0 DAVENPORT LOS Results 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 14 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Future No Build 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 15 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 --1. 4--- fl L" Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I Traffic Volume (vph) 542 4 149 4 4 1 13 129 1497 4 18 3 Future Volume (vph) 542 4 149 4 4 1 13 129 1497 4 18 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 550 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.985 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.978 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1794 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1835 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 807 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 10.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 602 4 166 4 4 1 14 143 1663 4 20 3 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 305 166 0 9 0 0 157 1667 0 0 23 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 2 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 80.0 15.0 15.0 Total Split ( %) 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 9.7% 9.7% 10.4% 10.4% 55.6% 10.4% 10.4% Maximum Green (s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 7.6 7.6 8.9 8.9 73.7 9.1 9.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 7.2 8.9 92.8 7.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.06 0.64 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.56 0.10 1.44 0.73 0.25 Control Delay 97.9 99.9 60.8 67.5 287.3 22.0 72.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 97.9 99.9 60.8 67.5 287.3 22.0 72.3 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 16 AM 2020 FNB Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 t Lane Group SBT SBR LaneXonfigurations tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 1228 364 Future Volume (vph) 1228 364 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 55 100 Storage Lanes 749 1 Taper Length (ft) 9.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Frt 1364 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 55 Link Distance (ft) 749 Travel Time (s) 9.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1364 404 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1364 404 Turn Type NA pm +ov Protected Phases 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 6 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.6 13.9 Total Split (s) 80.0 35.0 Total Split ( %) 55.6% 24.3% Maximum Green (s) 73.4 28.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.3 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.3 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 6.0 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.4 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 15.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 45.0 0.0 Recall Mode C -Min None Act Effct Green (s) 85.7 117.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.31 Control Delay 22.1 3.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.1 3.5 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 17 AM 2020 FNB Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02121/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL LOS F F E E F C E Approach Delay 90.7 67.5 44.8 Approach LOS F E D Queue Length 50th (ft) 294 298 142 8 —199 555 21 Queue Length 95th (ft) #483 #490 221 29 #349 860 52 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 727 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 550 125 Base Capacity (vph) 328 329 308 96 109 2281 111 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.93 0.54 0.09 1.44 0.73 0.21 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 144 Actuated Cycle Length: 144 Offset: 90 (63 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State o 1 * I o2 [R) I 03 1 V1 "04 IN 05 11 06 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 18 AM 2020 FNB Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 t Lane Group SBT SBR LOS C A Approach Delay 18.5 Approach LOS B Queue Length 50th (ft) 410 60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 615 84 Internal Link Dist (ft) 669 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 2105 1308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.31 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 19 AM 2020 FNB Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations None 4 11.7 11.7 r tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 54 0 0 0 168 0 1805 19 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 20 54 0 0 0 168 0 1805 19 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected 0.987 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1839 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.987 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1839 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1295 122 769 Travel Time (s) 2.6 25.2 1.5 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 60 0 0 0 187 0 2006 21 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 82 0 0 0 187 0 2006 21 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 57.0 57.0 Total Split ( %) 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 75.0% 75.0% Maximum Green (s) 13.2 13.2 13.2 50.7 50.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Minimum Gap (s) Time Before Reduce (s) Time To Reduce (s) Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 None None None 11.7 11.7 0.15 0.29 30.5 0.0 30.5 C 30.5 C 0.15 0.75 50.5 0.0 50.5 D 50.5 D Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 20 6.0 3.4 15.0 45.0 C -Max 52.2 0.69 0.83 13.0 0.0 13.0 B 12.9 B 6.0 3.4 15.0 45.0 C -Max 52.2 0.69 0.02 4.3 0.0 4.3 A AM 2020 FNB Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 83 327 3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 72 #168 442 9 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1215 42 689 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 319 279 2429 1087 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.67 0.83 0.02 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ana Nnases: JUU: Uti 421 & tiff Manassas Lett ana u- turn /Manassas ur 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 21 --l"O7 AM 2020 FNB Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 74 1391 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 74 1391 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 82 1546 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 82 1546 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 22 AM 2020 FNB Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1380 11 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1380 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1533 12 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1533 12 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 60.0 60.0 Total Split ( %) 21.1% 21.1% 78.9% 78.9% Maximum Green (s) 10.7 10.7 53.9 53.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.7 8.7 65.8 64.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.87 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.24 0.50 0.01 Control Delay 30.7 32.9 3.1 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 32.9 3.1 2.5 LOS C C A A Approach Delay 30.7 32.9 3.1 Approach LOS C C A 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 FNB C. Steiss Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 23 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 22 98 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 52 162 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 269 311 3062 1345 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.50 0.01 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 ana F'nases: NZ: U5 421 & SnarKS Eve Lane/Nb Manassas Lett I urn # 0e 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 24 AM 2020 FNB Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1824 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1824 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2027 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2027 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 25 AM 2020 FNB Page 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement � 0.5 WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 0 2258 r 1p t - - - - - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 6 1 2024 8 10 16 1596 Future Vol, veh /h 0 6 1 2024 8 10 16 1596 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 None - - - None Stage 2 - None Storage Length - - 0 325 - 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 7 1 2249 9 11 18 1773 Major /Minor Minorl 198 Majorl Major2 0.011 - Conflicting Flow All 0.311 - 1129 1773 0 0 2258 2258 0 Stage 1 E - - - - - - - - Stage 2 1.2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 198 105 - 50 224 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 198 105 - 93 93 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 23.8 0 1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 105 - 198 93 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.034 0.311 - HCM Control Delay (s) 39.7 - 23.8 60.3 - HCM Lane LOS E - C F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1.2 - 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 26 AM 2020 FNB Page 12 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 --1. 4--- fl t" Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I Traffic Volume (vph) 443 4 94 2 4 1 11 99 1211 1 21 4 Future Volume (vph) 443 4 94 2 4 1 11 99 1211 1 21 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 550 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.981 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.986 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1802 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1827 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 807 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 10.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 492 4 104 2 4 1 12 110 1346 1 23 4 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 246 250 104 0 7 0 0 122 1347 0 0 27 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 2 1 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 95.0 17.0 17.0 Total Split ( %) 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 9.9% 9.9% 11.2% 11.2% 62.5% 11.2% 11.2% Maximum Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 8.6 8.6 10.9 10.9 88.7 11.1 11.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min None None Act Effct Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 7.6 10.9 109.3 7.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.72 0.05 v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.55 0.08 0.97 0.53 0.30 Control Delay 192.2 198.9 75.2 70.3 136.1 14.3 78.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 192.2 198.9 75.2 70.3 136.1 14.3 78.3 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 27 PM 2020 FNB Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 t Lane Group SBT SBR LaneXonfigurations tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 2044 374 Future Volume (vph) 2044 374 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 55 100 Storage Lanes 749 1 Taper Length (ft) 9.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Frt 2271 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 55 Link Distance (ft) 749 Travel Time (s) 9.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 2271 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2271 416 Turn Type NA pm +ov Protected Phases 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 6 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 14.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.6 13.9 Total Split (s) 95.0 25.0 Total Split ( %) 62.5% 16.4% Maximum Green (s) 88.4 18.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.3 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.3 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 6.0 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.4 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 15.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 45.0 0.0 Recall Mode C -Min None Act Effct Green (s) 100.4 123.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.81 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.32 Control Delay 37.7 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.7 3.9 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 28 PM 2020 FNB Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02121/2020 --I. -# -*--- fl t L* D. Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL LOS F F E E F B E Approach Delay 174.7 70.3 24.4 Approach LOS F E C Queue Length 50th (ft) —315 —324 99 7 123 251 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) #508 #516 166 24 #259 666 61 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 727 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 550 125 Base Capacity (vph) 200 200 188 103 126 2544 129 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.55 0.07 0.97 0.53 0.21 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 152 Actuated Cycle Length: 152 Offset: 10 (7 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.25 Intersection Signal Delay: 48.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State o 1 * I o2 m) I 03 1 %4 IN 05 * • 06 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 29 PM 2020 FNB Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 t Lane Group SBT SBR LOS D A Approach Delay 32.9 Approach LOS C Queue Length 50th (ft) 988 70 Queue Length 95th (ft) #1470 97 Internal Link Dist (ft) 669 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 2337 1288 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.97 0.32 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 30 PM 2020 FNB Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0.0 4 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 tt r 45.0 Recall Mode None Traffic Volume (vph) 24 133 0 0 0 83 0 1129 31 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 24 133 0 0 0 83 0 1129 31 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt C C A 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected 0.992 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1848 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.992 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1848 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1279 122 769 Travel Time (s) 2.6 24.9 1.5 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 148 0 0 0 92 0 1254 34 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 175 0 0 0 92 0 1254 34 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 52.0 52.0 Total Split ( %) 31.6% 31.6% 31.6% 68.4% 68.4% Maximum Green (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 45.7 45.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 11.5 11.5 52.4 52.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.69 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.38 0.51 0.03 Control Delay 31.6 32.3 7.1 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.6 32.3 7.1 4.8 LOS C C A A Approach Delay 31.6 32.3 7.1 Approach LOS C C A 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 31 PM 2020 FNB Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 94 40 125 4 Queue Length 95th (ft) m109 76 210 15 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1199 42 689 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 442 385 2439 1091 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.24 0.51 0.03 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 1 t02 --*0 7 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 32 PM 2020 FNB Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 157 1959 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 157 1959 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 174 2177 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 174 2177 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 33 PM 2020 FNB Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1926 33 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1926 33 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2140 37 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2140 37 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 61.0 61.0 Total Split ( %) 19.7% 19.7% 80.3% 80.3% Maximum Green (s) 9.7 9.7 54.9 54.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.7 57.9 55.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.56 0.79 0.03 Control Delay 30.8 38.9 12.0 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.8 38.9 12.0 2.7 LOS C D B A Approach Delay 30.8 38.9 11.9 Approach LOS C D B 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 FNB C. Steiss Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 34 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 65 659 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 49 120 m835 m7 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 248 286 2695 1163 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.51 0.79 0.03 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 35 03 PM 2020 FNB Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1160 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1160 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1289 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1289 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 36 PM 2020 FNB Page 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement � 0.8 WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 0 1768 r 4Q t - - - - - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 38 9 1586 5 10 10 2340 Future Vol, veh /h 0 38 9 1586 5 10 10 2340 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 None - - - None Stage 2 - None Storage Length - - 0 325 - 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 42 10 1762 6 11 11 2600 Major /Minor Minorl 288 Majorl Major2 0.333 - Conflicting Flow All 0.154 - 884 2600 0 0 1768 1768 0 Stage 1 F - - - - - - - - Stage 2 0.5 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 288 30 - 105 349 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 288 30 - 144 144 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 19.6 1 0.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 30 - 288 144 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.333 - 0.147 0.154 - HCM Control Delay (s) 176.2 - 19.6 34.4 - HCM Lane LOS F - C D - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - 0.5 0.5 - 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 37 PM 2020 FNB Page 12 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Phase 28(1) Build + Improvements 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 38 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I tt Traffic Volume (vph) 542 4 153 4 4 1 110 1689 4 18 3 1289 Future Volume (vph) 542 4 153 4 4 1 110 1689 4 18 3 1289 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 450 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.985 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.978 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1794 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1835 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 592 749 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 7.3 9.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 602 4 170 4 4 1 122 1877 4 20 3 1432 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 305 170 0 9 0 122 1881 0 0 23 1432 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 20.6 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 80.0 15.0 15.0 80.0 Total Split ( %) 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 9.7% 9.7% 10.4% 55.6% 10.4% 10.4% 55.6% Maximum Green (s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 7.6 7.6 8.9 73.7 9.1 9.1 73.4 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 1.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 6.6 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 7.2 8.9 92.8 7.4 85.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.06 0.64 0.05 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.57 0.10 1.12 0.82 0.25 0.68 Control Delay 97.9 99.9 61.4 67.5 180.4 25.5 72.3 23.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 97.9 99.9 61.4 67.5 180.4 25.5 72.3 23.0 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 39 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR Laronfigurations r Traffic Volume (vph) 364 Future Volume (vph) 364 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 404 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 404 Turn Type pm +ov Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 Total Split (s) 35.0 Total Split ( %) 24.3% Maximum Green (s) 28.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 117.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.31 Control Delay 3.5 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 3.5 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 40 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02119/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT LOS F F E E F C E C Approach Delay 90.7 67.5 34.9 19.4 Approach LOS F E C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 294 298 145 8 —131 707 21 445 Queue Length 95th (ft) #483 #490 226 29 #267 #1131 52 666 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 512 669 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 450 125 Base Capacity (vph) 328 329 308 96 109 2281 111 2105 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.93 0.55 0.09 1.12 0.82 0.21 0.68 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 144 Actuated Cycle Length: 144 Offset: 90 (63 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.12 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State o 1 * I o2 [R) I 03 1 V1 "04 IN 05 11 06 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 41 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 84 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 1308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 42 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 rr tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 118 0 0 0 424 0 1805 35 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 20 118 0 0 0 424 0 1805 35 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.993 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1850 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1850 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1305 122 896 Travel Time (s) 2.6 25.4 1.5 11.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 131 0 0 0 471 0 2006 39 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 153 0 0 0 471 0 2006 39 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 54.0 54.0 Total Split ( %) 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 71.1% 71.1% Maximum Green (s) 16.2 16.2 16.2 47.7 47.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 15.4 15.4 48.5 48.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.64 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.83 0.89 0.04 Control Delay 29.7 43.2 18.5 5.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.7 43.2 18.5 5.6 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 43 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02119/2020 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS C D B A Approach Delay 29.7 43.2 18.2 Approach LOS C D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 120 378 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 #197 #538 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1225 42 816 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 Base Capacity (vph) 394 594 2256 1009 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.79 0.89 0.04 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 1 t02 --WO 7 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 44 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/19/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 138 1442 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 138 1442 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 153 1602 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 153 1602 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 45 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1431 11 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1431 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1590 12 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1590 12 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 60.0 60.0 Total Split ( %) 21.1% 21.1% 78.9% 78.9% Maximum Green (s) 10.7 10.7 53.9 53.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.7 8.7 65.8 64.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.87 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.24 0.52 0.01 Control Delay 30.7 32.9 3.2 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 32.9 3.2 2.5 LOS C C A A Approach Delay 30.7 32.9 3.2 Approach LOS C C A 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements T. Lee Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 46 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 22 104 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 52 173 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 269 311 3062 1345 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.52 0.01 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ana F'nases: NZ: U5 421 & SnarKS Eve Lane/Nb Manassas Lett I urn # 0e 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 47 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1840 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1840 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2044 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2044 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 48 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02119/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement 0.6 WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 0 2471 r 1p t - - - - - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 6 1 2216 8 10 16 1657 Future Vol, veh /h 0 6 1 2216 8 10 16 1657 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 None - - - None Stage 2 - None Storage Length - - 0 325 - 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 7 1 2462 9 11 18 1841 Major /Minor Minorl 168 Majorl Major2 0.012 - Conflicting Flow All 0.413 - 1236 1841 0 0 2471 2471 0 Stage 1 E - - - - - - - - Stage 2 1.6 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 168 94 - 36 184 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 168 94 - 70 70 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 27.3 0 1.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 94 - 168 70 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.04 0.413 - HCM Control Delay (s) 43.8 - 27.3 89.1 - HCM Lane LOS E - D F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1.6 - 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 49 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 12 HCM 2010 TWSC 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access 02119/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 6.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor2 131 - r* 0.014 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 16.2 801 801 1606 tt r* Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 32 65 0 0 0 0 0 1442 4 Future Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 32 65 0 0 0 0 0 1442 4 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None 272 - None Storage Length - - 0 104 - Stage 1 - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 EB - WB - SIB 0 - Grade, % - 0 - HCM LOS 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 4 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 1602 4 Major /Minor Minor2 131 - Minorl 0.014 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 16.2 801 801 1606 - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 - 801 1606 - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 7.54 6.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.54 5.54 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.32 3.52 4.02 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 0 327 276 104 0 0 - - Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 - 344 163 0 0 - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 327 272 104 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 272 104 - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - 339 163 - Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 16.2 101.1 0 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBLnlWBLnl SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 327 131 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.823 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.2 101.1 - HCM Lane LOS C F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 5.1 - 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 50 AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 14 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I tt Traffic Volume (vph) 443 4 108 2 4 1 82 1328 1 21 4 2241 Future Volume (vph) 443 4 108 2 4 1 82 1328 1 21 4 2241 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 450 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.981 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.986 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1802 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1827 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 554 749 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 6.9 9.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 492 4 120 2 4 1 91 1476 1 23 4 2490 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 246 250 120 0 7 0 91 1477 0 0 27 2490 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 20.6 Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 95.0 17.0 17.0 95.0 Total Split ( %) 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 9.9% 9.9% 11.2% 62.5% 11.2% 11.2% 62.5% Maximum Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 8.6 8.6 10.9 88.7 11.1 11.1 88.4 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 1.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 6.6 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 7.6 10.2 109.3 7.7 101.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.72 0.05 0.67 v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.64 0.08 0.77 0.58 0.30 1.06 Control Delay 192.2 198.9 80.1 70.3 103.3 16.4 89.4 62.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 192.2 198.9 80.1 70.3 103.3 16.4 89.4 62.4 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 51 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR Laronfigurations r Traffic Volume (vph) 374 Future Volume (vph) 374 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 416 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 416 Turn Type pm +ov Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 Total Split (s) 25.0 Total Split ( %) 16.4% Maximum Green (s) 18.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 124.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.32 Control Delay 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 3.2 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 52 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02119/21020 --1. 4--- t L* t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT LOS F F F E F B F E Approach Delay 173.1 70.3 21.4 54.3 Approach LOS F E C D Queue Length 50th (ft) —315 —324 115 7 92 297 26 —1421 Queue Length 95th (ft) #508 #516 188 24 m #173 768 m42 #1696 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 474 669 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 450 125 Base Capacity (vph) 200 200 188 103 126 2544 129 2354 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.64 0.07 0.72 0.58 0.21 1.06 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 152 Actuated Cycle Length: 152 Offset: 10 (7 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.25 Intersection Signal Delay: 58.5 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State IN 05 � • 06 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 53 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/19/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) 115 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 1296 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 54 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 rr tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 24 343 0 0 0 238 0 1129 84 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 24 343 0 0 0 238 0 1129 84 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1857 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1857 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1276 122 920 Travel Time (s) 2.6 24.9 1.5 11.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 381 0 0 0 264 0 1254 93 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 408 0 0 0 264 0 1254 93 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 33.4 33.4 33.4 42.6 42.6 Total Split ( %) 43.9% 43.9% 43.9% 56.1% 56.1% Maximum Green (s) 27.6 27.6 27.6 36.3 36.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.2 21.2 42.7 42.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.34 0.63 0.10 Control Delay 26.1 22.0 14.2 9.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.1 22.0 14.2 9.8 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 55 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02119/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS C C B A Approach Delay 26.1 22.0 13.9 Approach LOS C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 229 56 195 19 Queue Length 95th (ft) m225 78 317 48 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1196 42 840 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 Base Capacity (vph) 674 1012 1989 889 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.26 0.63 0.10 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ana Nnases: NU: U5 421 & 6b Manassas Lett and u- turn /Manassas ur 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee 7 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 56 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/19/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 367 1990 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 367 1990 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 408 2211 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 408 2211 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 57 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1957 33 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1957 33 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2174 37 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2174 37 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 61.0 61.0 Total Split ( %) 19.7% 19.7% 80.3% 80.3% Maximum Green (s) 9.7 9.7 54.9 54.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.7 57.9 55.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.56 0.81 0.03 Control Delay 30.8 38.9 11.8 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.8 38.9 11.8 2.7 LOS C D B A Approach Delay 30.8 38.9 11.7 Approach LOS C D B 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements T. Lee Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 58 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 65 691 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 49 120 m770 m7 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 248 286 2695 1163 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.51 0.81 0.03 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 59 03 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/19/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1213 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1213 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1348 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1348 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 60 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02119/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Minorl r 4Q t 0.476 - Conflicting Flow All 0.187 - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 38 9 1702 5 10 10 2537 Future Vol, veh /h 0 38 9 1702 5 10 10 2537 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - 2.52 None - 0 None 21 - None Storage Length 0 0 325 - - - Stage 2 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 42 10 1891 6 11 11 2819 Major /Minor Minorl 261 Majorl Major2 0.476 - Conflicting Flow All 0.187 - 949 2819 0 0 1897 1897 0 Stage 1 F - - - - - - - - Stage 2 0.7 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 261 21 - 87 310 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 261 21 - 119 119 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 21.4 1.5 0.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 21 - 261 119 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.476 - 0.162 0.187 - HCM Control Delay (s) 283.6 - 21.4 41.9 - HCM Lane LOS F - C E - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 0.6 0.7 - 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 61 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 12 HCM 2010 TWSC 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access 02119/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 28.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor2 28 - r* 0.031 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 31.2 1048.2 - 1344 1344 2691 tt r* Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 21 46 0 0 0 0 0 2418 4 Future Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 21 46 0 0 0 0 0 2418 4 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None 107 - None Storage Length - - 0 —21 - Stage 1 - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 EB - WB - SIB 0 - Grade, % - 0 - D 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 4 23 51 0 0 0 0 0 2687 4 Major /Minor Minor2 28 - Minorl 0.031 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 31.2 1048.2 - 1344 1344 2691 - 0 Stage 1 8.9 - - 0 0 - - Stage 2 - 1344 2691 - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 7.54 6.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.54 5.54 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.32 3.52 4.02 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 0 142 110 —21 0 0 - - Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 - 160 —45 0 0 - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 142 107 —21 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 107 —21 - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - 155 —45 - Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 31.2 $1048.2 0 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBLnlWBLnl SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 142 28 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 2.659 - HCM Control Delay (s) 31.2 1048.2 - HCM Lane LOS D F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 8.9 - Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 62 PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Page 14 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Phase 28(2) Build 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 63 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I tt Traffic Volume (vph) 542 4 153 4 4 1 102 1643 4 18 3 1307 Future Volume (vph) 542 4 153 4 4 1 102 1643 4 18 3 1307 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 450 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.985 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.978 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1794 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1835 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 592 385 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 7.3 4.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 602 4 170 4 4 1 113 1826 4 20 3 1452 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 305 170 0 9 0 113 1830 0 0 23 1452 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 20.6 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 35.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 80.0 15.0 15.0 80.0 Total Split ( %) 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 9.7% 9.7% 10.4% 55.6% 10.4% 10.4% 55.6% Maximum Green (s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 7.6 7.6 8.9 73.7 9.1 9.1 73.4 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 1.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 6.6 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 7.2 8.9 92.8 7.4 85.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.06 0.64 0.05 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.57 0.10 1.04 0.80 0.25 0.69 Control Delay 97.9 99.9 61.4 67.5 159.8 24.5 72.3 23.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 97.9 99.9 61.4 67.5 159.8 24.5 72.3 23.3 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Pagel Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 64 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR Laronfigurations r Traffic Volume (vph) 372 Future Volume (vph) 372 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 413 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 413 Turn Type pm +ov Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 Total Split (s) 35.0 Total Split ( %) 24.3% Maximum Green (s) 28.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 117.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.32 Control Delay 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 3.6 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 65 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02121/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT LOS F F E E F C E C Approach Delay 90.7 67.5 32.4 19.6 Approach LOS F E C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 294 298 145 8 —113 667 21 455 Queue Length 95th (ft) #483 #490 226 29 #244 #1080 52 681 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 512 305 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 450 125 Base Capacity (vph) 328 329 308 96 109 2281 111 2105 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.93 0.55 0.09 1.04 0.80 0.21 0.69 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 144 Actuated Cycle Length: 144 Offset: 90 (63 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State o 1 * I o2 [R) I 03 1 V1 "04 IN 05 11 06 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 66 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 1308 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 67 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 rr tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 20 123 0 0 0 361 0 1805 35 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 20 123 0 0 0 361 0 1805 35 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.993 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1850 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1850 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1292 122 896 Travel Time (s) 2.6 25.2 1.5 11.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 137 0 0 0 401 0 2006 39 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 159 0 0 0 401 0 2006 39 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 54.0 54.0 Total Split ( %) 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 71.1% 71.1% Maximum Green (s) 16.2 16.2 16.2 47.7 47.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 14.4 14.4 49.5 49.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.65 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.76 0.87 0.04 Control Delay 31.2 38.9 17.0 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.2 38.9 17.0 5.5 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 68 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02121/2020 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS C D B A Approach Delay 31.2 38.9 16.8 Approach LOS C D B Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 100 375 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 150 #538 16 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1212 42 816 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 Base Capacity (vph) 394 594 2305 1031 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.87 0.04 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 1 t02 --WO 7 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 69 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 143 1446 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 143 1446 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 159 1607 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 159 1607 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 7 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 70 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1435 11 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 1435 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1594 12 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 1594 12 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 60.0 60.0 Total Split ( %) 21.1% 21.1% 78.9% 78.9% Maximum Green (s) 10.7 10.7 53.9 53.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 8.7 8.7 65.8 64.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.87 0.85 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.24 0.52 0.01 Control Delay 30.7 32.9 3.3 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 32.9 3.3 2.5 LOS C C A A Approach Delay 30.7 32.9 3.2 Approach LOS C C A 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 71 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 22 105 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 52 174 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 269 311 3062 1345 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.52 0.01 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.5 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ana F'nases: NZ: U5 421 & SnarKS Eve Lane/Nb Manassas Lett I urn # 06 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 9 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 72 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1840 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 46 1840 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2044 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 51 2044 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 10 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 73 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations Minorl r 4Q t 0.272 - Conflicting Flow All 0.425 - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 6 23 2231 8 10 16 1661 Future Vol, veh /h 0 6 23 2231 8 10 16 1661 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - 2.52 None - 0 None 94 - None Storage Length 0 0 325 - - - Stage 2 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 7 26 2479 9 11 18 1846 Major /Minor Minorl 166 Majorl Major2 0.272 - Conflicting Flow All 0.425 - 1244 1846 0 0 2488 2488 0 Stage 1 F - - - - - - - - Stage 2 1.7 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 166 94 - 35 181 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 166 94 - 68 68 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 27.6 0.6 1.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) 94 - 166 68 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.272 - 0.04 0.425 - HCM Control Delay (s) 57 - 27.6 92.5 - HCM Lane LOS F - D F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.1 1.7 - 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 12 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 74 HCM 2010 TWSC 1000: US 421 & Site Access 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt Conflicting Flow All tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 83 2204 0 0 1700 Future Vol, veh /h 0 83 2204 0 0 1700 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 3.32 None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 92 2449 0 0 1889 Major /Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1225 0 - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 171 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 171 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 48.3 0 0 HCM LOS E Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBTWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh /h) 171 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.539 HCM Control Delay (s) 48.3 HCM Lane LOS E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 14 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 75 HCM 2010 TWSC 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor2 133 - r* 0.014 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 16.3 811 811 1626 tt r* Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 34 53 0 0 0 0 0 1460 4 Future Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 34 53 0 0 0 0 0 1460 4 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None 267 - None Storage Length - - 0 101 - Stage 1 - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 EB - WB - SIB 0 - Grade, % - 0 - HCM LOS 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 4 38 59 0 0 0 0 0 1622 4 Major /Minor Minor2 133 - Minorl 0.014 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 16.3 811 811 1626 - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 - 811 1626 - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 7.54 6.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.54 5.54 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.32 3.52 4.02 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 0 322 271 101 0 0 - - Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 - 339 159 0 0 - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 322 267 101 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 267 101 - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - 334 159 - Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 16.3 83 0 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBLnlWBLnl SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 322 133 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.727 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.3 83 - HCM Lane LOS C F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 4.2 - 160278 Tarin Woods II AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out T. Lee Page 16 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 76 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 1 t I tt Traffic Volume (vph) 443 4 108 2 4 1 77 1299 1 21 4 2262 Future Volume (vph) 443 4 108 2 4 1 77 1299 1 21 4 2262 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 200 0 0 450 0 125 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 100 25 75 200 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.981 Flt Protected 0.950 0.953 0.986 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1686 1583 0 1802 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.953 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1686 1583 0 1827 0 1770 3539 0 0 1770 3539 Right Turn on Red No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 25 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 1083 380 554 376 Travel Time (s) 16.4 10.4 6.9 4.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 492 4 120 2 4 1 86 1443 1 23 4 2513 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) 50% Lane Group Flow (vph) 246 250 120 0 7 0 86 1444 0 0 27 2513 Turn Type Split NA Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 4 3 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 3 5 2 1 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.4 13.4 13.1 20.3 12.9 12.9 20.6 Total Split (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 95.0 17.0 17.0 95.0 Total Split ( %) 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 9.9% 9.9% 11.2% 62.5% 11.2% 11.2% 62.5% Maximum Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 8.6 8.6 10.9 88.7 11.1 11.1 88.4 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 5.3 3.0 3.0 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 1.0 2.9 2.9 1.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.9 6.6 Lead /Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 7.6 10.0 109.3 7.7 101.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.72 0.05 0.67 v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.64 0.08 0.74 0.57 0.30 1.07 Control Delay 192.2 198.9 80.1 70.3 99.8 16.6 78.3 64.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 192.2 198.9 80.1 70.3 99.8 16.6 78.3 64.5 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Pagel Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 77 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR Laronfigurations r Traffic Volume (vph) 379 Future Volume (vph) 379 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 Right Turn on Red No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 421 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 421 Turn Type pm +ov Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.9 Total Split (s) 25.0 Total Split ( %) 16.4% Maximum Green (s) 18.1 Yellow Time (s) 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.9 Lead /Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 124.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.32 Control Delay 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 3.8 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 78 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02121/21020 --1. 4--- t L* t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT LOS F F F E F B E E Approach Delay 173.1 70.3 21.3 56.0 Approach LOS F E C E Queue Length 50th (ft) —315 —324 115 7 87 294 26 —1416 Queue Length 95th (ft) #508 #516 188 24 m #154 761 61 #1724 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1003 300 474 296 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 200 450 125 Base Capacity (vph) 200 200 188 103 126 2544 129 2358 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.23 1.25 0.64 0.07 0.68 0.57 0.21 1.07 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 152 Actuated Cycle Length: 152 Offset: 10 (7 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.25 Intersection Signal Delay: 59.7 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. and Phases: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State IN 05 � • 06 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 3 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 79 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway 02/21/2020 4/ Lane Group SBR LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) 72 Queue Length 95th (ft) 98 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 Base Capacity (vph) 1298 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 Intersection Summary 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 80 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 rr tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 24 357 0 0 0 199 0 1129 87 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 24 357 0 0 0 199 0 1129 87 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1857 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1857 0 0 0 2787 0 3539 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 20 35 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 1291 122 920 Travel Time (s) 2.6 25.1 1.5 11.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 397 0 0 0 221 0 1254 97 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 0 0 0 221 0 1254 97 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 2 Permitted Phases 7 7 2 Detector Phase 7 7 7 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 20.3 20.3 Total Split (s) 33.4 33.4 33.4 42.6 42.6 Total Split ( %) 43.9% 43.9% 43.9% 56.1% 56.1% Maximum Green (s) 27.6 27.6 27.6 36.3 36.3 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.3 5.3 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.6 21.6 42.3 42.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.28 0.64 0.11 Control Delay 24.4 20.9 14.5 10.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.4 20.9 14.5 10.0 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 81 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr 02121/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS C C B B Approach Delay 24.4 20.9 14.2 Approach LOS C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 238 45 198 20 Queue Length 95th (ft) m232 67 317 50 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1 1211 42 840 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 Base Capacity (vph) 674 1012 1967 880 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.22 0.64 0.11 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ana Nnases: NU: U5 421 & 6b Manassas Lett and u- turn /Manassas ur 7 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 82 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ) ttt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 381 1992 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 381 1992 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 1770 5085 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 76 125 145 Travel Time (s) 2.6 1.5 1.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 423 2213 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 423 2213 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 7 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 83 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) r 0.0 t 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1959 33 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 43 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1959 33 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1863 0 0 0 0 0 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red No No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 25 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 348 61 1306 125 Travel Time (s) 9.5 2.1 16.2 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2177 37 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 48 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 2177 37 Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 3 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Detector Phase 3 3 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.3 10.3 20.1 20.1 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 61.0 61.0 Total Split ( %) 19.7% 19.7% 80.3% 80.3% Maximum Green (s) 9.7 9.7 54.9 54.9 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 5.1 5.1 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.3 3.3 4.1 6.1 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.4 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 Recall Mode None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.7 57.9 55.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.76 0.74 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.56 0.81 0.03 Control Delay 30.8 38.9 11.7 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.8 38.9 11.7 2.7 LOS C D B A Approach Delay 30.8 38.9 11.5 Approach LOS C D B 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 8 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 84 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 � � t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 65 696 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 49 120 m769 m7 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 1 1226 45 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 248 286 2695 1163 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.51 0.81 0.03 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 76 Actuated Cycle Length: 76 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn 03 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 9 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 85 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn 02/21/2020 t Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1216 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 132 1216 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 350 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 150 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3539 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 20 55 55 Link Distance (ft) 61 482 122 Travel Time (s) 2.1 6.0 1.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1351 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 147 1351 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 10 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 86 HCM 2010 TWSC 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh Movement � 3 WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 0 1904 r 4Q t - - - - - tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 38 22 1709 5 10 10 2550 Future Vol, veh /h 0 38 22 1709 5 10 10 2550 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 None - - - None Stage 2 - None Storage Length - - 0 325 - 325 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 42 24 1899 6 11 11 2833 Major /Minor Minorl 260 Majorl Major2 1.164 - Conflicting Flow All 0.188 - 953 2833 0 0 1904 1905 0 Stage 1 F - - - - - - - - Stage 2 0.7 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 6.44 - 6.44 4.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 2.52 - 2.52 2.22 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 260 —21 - 86 308 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 260 —21 - 118 118 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 21.5 6.5 0.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBU NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT Capacity (veh /h) —21 - 260 118 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.164 - 0.162 0.188 - HCM Control Delay (s) $ 515.3 - 21.5 42.4 - HCM Lane LOS F - C E - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.3 - 0.6 0.7 - Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 12 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 87 HCM 2010 TWSC 1000: US 421 & Site Access 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 0.3 Movement � WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt Conflicting Flow All tt Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 50 1763 0 0 2662 Future Vol, veh /h 0 50 1763 0 0 2662 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 3.32 None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 56 1959 0 0 2958 Major /Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 980 0 - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.94 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow -up Hdwy - 3.32 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 249 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - - 0 0 Stage 2 0 - - 0 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 249 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - Approach WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 23.6 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane /Major Mvmt NBTWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh /h) 249 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.223 HCM Control Delay (s) 23.6 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 14 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 88 HCM 2010 TWSC 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access 02121/2020 Intersection Int Delay, s /veh 19.6 Movement � EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor2 32 - r* 0.03 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 30.3 1319 1319 2641 tt r* Traffic Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 22 39 0 0 0 0 0 2373 4 Future Vol, veh /h 0 0 4 22 39 0 0 0 0 0 2373 4 Conflicting Peds, # /hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None 112 - None Storage Length - - 0 —23 - Stage 1 - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 EB - WB - SIB 0 - Grade, % - 0 - HCM LOS 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 4 24 43 0 0 0 0 0 2637 4 Major /Minor Minor2 32 - Minorl 0.03 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 30.3 1319 1319 2641 - 0 Stage 1 0.1 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 - 1319 2641 - Critical Hdwy - 6.94 7.54 6.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.54 5.54 - - Follow -up Hdwy 3.32 3.52 4.02 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 0 147 115 —23 0 0 - - Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 - 166 48 0 0 - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 147 112 —23 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 112 —23 - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - 161 48 - Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 30.3 $ 782 0 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane /Major Mvmt EBLnlWBLnl SBT SBR Capacity (veh /h) 147 32 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 2.118 - HCM Control Delay (s) 30.3 $ 782 - HCM Lane LOS D F - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 7.8 - Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 160278 Tarin Woods II PM 2020 Phase 2B2 with Improvements with RO T. Lee Page 16 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 89 0 DAVENPORT Queueing and Blocking Reports 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 90 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Future No Build 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 91 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 FNB 02/21/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement NB NB Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 268 260 Average Queue (ft) 16 16 95th Queue (ft) 103 107 Link Distance (ft) 707 707 Upstream Blk Time ( %) TR UL Queuing Penalty (veh) T R Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 1071 Storage Blk Time ( %) 50 625 Queuing Penalty (veh) 750 34 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 400 1071 275 50 625 751 750 34 376 338 82 Average Queue (ft) 340 582 171 9 417 280 252 6 200 176 21 95th Queue (ft) 456 1060 369 34 637 642 595 20 344 313 59 Link Distance (ft) 1008 310 716 716 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 9 3 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 31 6 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 550 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 25 71 0 13 3 17 17 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 107 297 2 95 4 4 63 0 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 85 259 112 125 29 Average Queue (ft) 43 96 89 77 5 95th Queue (ft) 80 190 130 125 23 Link Distance (ft) 33 1244 52 52 52 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 33 12 11 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 72 68 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 92 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 FNB 02/21/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SIB SIB Directions Served L T Maximum Queue (ft) 25 40 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 8 13 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 9 292 Queuing Penalty (veh) 61 61 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 35 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 6 Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 92 72 115 122 27 14 37 37 45 1 50 64 94 110 9 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 35 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 6 10 350 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 18 95 55 Average Queue (ft) 1 21 5 95th Queue (ft) 6 72 29 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 93 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 FNB Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement WB SIB Directions Served R UL Maximum Queue (ft) 30 53 Average Queue (ft) 3 21 95th Queue (ft) 18 44 Link Distance (ft) 286 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 807 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 94 02/21/2020 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 FNB 02/21/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB B4 Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R T Maximum Queue (ft) 400 1047 275 51 212 295 308 325 759 776 350 428 Average Queue (ft) 398 970 193 12 87 118 126 60 568 567 285 59 95th Queue (ft) 404 1193 397 39 163 229 241 256 811 823 498 240 Link Distance (ft) 1008 310 716 716 669 669 712 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 63 10 11 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 122 129 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 550 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 71 90 30 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 227 284 7 111 3 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement B4 Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 466 Average Queue (ft) 64 95th Queue (ft) 265 Link Distance (ft) 712 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 95 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 FNB 02/21/2020 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB LT R 104 148 75 39 106 92 33 1227 52 81 NB T 111 73 128 50 7 28 NB T 88 37 82 50 3 14 NB R 74 7 35 50 0 2 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 108 52 52 Average Queue (ft) 27 3 3 95th Queue (ft) 78 20 20 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 101 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 91 87 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 29 Link Distance (ft) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SB SB SB Directions Served R T T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 118 73 122 122 30 Average Queue (ft) 40 62 80 78 8 95th Queue (ft) 91 87 136 123 29 Link Distance (ft) 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 47 7 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 62 47 59 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II SimTraffic Report C. Steiss Page 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 96 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 FNB Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB Directions Served L T Maximum Queue (ft) 78 62 Average Queue (ft) 20 3 95th Queue (ft) 59 22 Link Distance (ft) 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) WB NB SIB R U UL 79 31 50 28 8 9 60 26 32 287 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1177 160278 Tarin Woods II C. Steiss 325 325 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 97 02/21/2020 SimTraffic Report Page 3 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Phase 28(1) Build + Improvements 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 98 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 11 Average Queue (ft) 0 95th Queue (ft) 8 Link Distance (ft) 48 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 52 Average Queue (ft) 3 95th Queue (ft) 24 Link Distance (ft) 508 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 14: US 421 & U -Turn Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 76 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 69 Link Distance (ft) 74 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 99 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 100: US 421 & CB Side Road /Kings Highway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served R R R R L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 154 124 181 168 101 374 344 73 243 310 319 23 Average Queue (ft) 54 21 103 68 40 139 148 10 130 112 119 3 95th Queue (ft) 115 71 159 144 88 310 312 41 216 254 262 14 Link Distance (ft) 485 1507 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1943 1943 0 508 508 508 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 17 0 0 3 62 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 325 250 600 Storage Blk Time ( %) 3 0 0 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0 0 3 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 400 867 Average Queue (ft) 351 537 95th Queue (ft) 461 891 Link Distance (ft) 425 1008 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 422 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 12 Storage Blk Time ( %) 23 69 Queuing Penalty (veh) 98 291 R LTR UL T TR UL T T R 275 49 299 407 425 97 392 422 350 210 8 149 200 212 12 190 193 54 389 32 283 381 405 61 363 376 206 36 310 500 500 53 669 669 23 20 0 0 96 140 123 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 225 200 450 0 125 Queuing Penalty (veh) 100 1 0 0 14 17 0 0 3 62 2 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 105 226 186 140 135 41 Average Queue (ft) 80 133 95 110 102 9 95th Queue (ft) 109 199 179 133 137 31 Link Distance (ft) 36 1249 53 53 53 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 69 23 20 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 96 140 123 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 160278 Tarin Woods II SimTraffic Report T. Lee Page 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 100 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SIB SIB SIB B25 B12 B12 Directions Served L T T T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 170 49 44 120 55 56 Average Queue (ft) 67 3 3 22 6 6 95th Queue (ft) 170 23 19 126 65 66 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 101 224 408 408 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 21 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 77 0 16 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 58 72 127 124 17 15 37 35 46 1 45 74 95 112 9 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 33 1 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 7 12 350 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 27 190 179 Average Queue (ft) 2 69 51 95th Queue (ft) 15 151 135 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 101 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 700: US 421 & U -Turn Movement WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 80 159 161 42 Average Queue (ft) 59 70 56 6 95th Queue (ft) 90 145 130 26 Link Distance (ft) 19 687 687 687 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 62 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 Queuing Penalty (veh) 56 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement WB NB SIB Directions Served R U UL Maximum Queue (ft) 43 14 61 Average Queue (ft) 6 1 19 95th Queue (ft) 26 7 47 Link Distance (ft) 239 Queuing Penalty (veh) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 22 74 Average Queue (ft) 3 45 95th Queue (ft) 14 74 Link Distance (ft) 214 14 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 32 Queuing Penalty (veh) 31 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 102 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 86 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 47 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1064 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 103 SimTraffic Report Page 5 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: US 421 Movement NB SIB SIB Directions Served R T T Maximum Queue (ft) 82 14 8 Average Queue (ft) 16 0 0 95th Queue (ft) 60 10 6 Link Distance (ft) 508 74 74 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 14: US 421 & U -Turn Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 95 Average Queue (ft) 48 95th Queue (ft) 104 Link Distance (ft) 74 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 15 Queuing Penalty (veh) 86 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 104 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 100: US 421 & CB Side Road /Kings Highway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served R R R R L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 159 124 230 206 184 344 332 81 282 289 293 50 Average Queue (ft) 71 23 134 103 70 144 155 15 150 79 97 7 95th Queue (ft) 134 82 198 188 138 287 293 51 252 198 216 28 Link Distance (ft) 485 1008 1507 310 1954 1954 669 508 508 508 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 72 13 13 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 160 171 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 100 200 200 325 250 600 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 6 0 1 0 0 2 28 28 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 1 0 0 2 7 106 8 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB B4 Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R T Maximum Queue (ft) 400 1057 275 41 141 287 286 275 763 764 350 569 Average Queue (ft) 393 1014 212 7 61 148 150 29 605 612 263 119 95th Queue (ft) 425 1110 393 28 123 271 262 140 881 889 496 424 Link Distance (ft) 1008 310 463 463 669 669 710 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 72 13 13 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 160 171 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 76 92 0 28 28 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 254 302 0 7 106 8 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement B4 Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 593 Average Queue (ft) 136 95th Queue (ft) 466 Link Distance (ft) 710 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 105 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB WB NB NB NB LT R R T T R 107 203 120 119 112 66 88 75 24 98 78 24 99 130 72 136 124 57 36 1220 0 53 53 53 59 0 19 15 2 216 Queuing Penalty (veh) 76 59 9 0 225 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SB SB SB B25 Directions Served L T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 184 48 66 133 Average Queue (ft) 112 6 8 16 95th Queue (ft) 196 28 38 72 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 101 224 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 12 0 20 61 Queuing Penalty (veh) 74 0 58 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SB SB SB Directions Served R T T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 78 88 122 131 43 Average Queue (ft) 33 67 84 92 9 95th Queue (ft) 66 87 135 136 31 Link Distance (ft) 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 58 7 10 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 76 47 69 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 106 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 79 130 124 Average Queue (ft) 26 33 15 95th Queue (ft) 68 96 68 Link Distance (ft) 94 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Link Distance (ft) 19 687 Queuing Penalty (veh) 687 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 68 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 1954 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 700: US 421 & U -Turn Movement WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 100 355 553 234 Average Queue (ft) 67 141 144 32 95th Queue (ft) 94 301 350 130 Link Distance (ft) 19 687 687 687 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 68 0 1954 Queuing Penalty (veh) 88 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement WB NB SIB SB SB Directions Served R U UL T T Maximum Queue (ft) 69 73 43 77 80 Average Queue (ft) 26 17 11 8 11 95th Queue (ft) 57 58 34 79 107 Link Distance (ft) 332 1954 1954 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 107 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements 02/19/2020 Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 26 67 Average Queue (ft) 5 47 95th Queue (ft) 18 77 Link Distance (ft) 242 8 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 50 Queuing Penalty (veh) 33 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 109 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 68 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1847 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 108 SimTraffic Report Page 5 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Phase 28(1) Build + Improvements with Right -Out 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 109 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Right Out 02/21/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 400 812 275 42 166 386 384 44 332 304 133 Average Queue (ft) 323 434 187 8 79 161 172 10 186 164 26 95th Queue (ft) 443 686 383 31 148 331 341 32 311 292 88 Link Distance (ft) 1008 Storage Blk Time ( %) 310 0 500 500 317 317 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 10 58 0 0 15 15 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 42 247 1 0 3 57 1 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 92 199 172 130 127 60 Average Queue (ft) 72 120 67 107 96 9 95th Queue (ft) 107 178 153 135 136 35 Link Distance (ft) 36 1235 52 52 52 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 57 21 16 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 79 128 101 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14-9- 110 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Right Out 02/21/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 124 10 14 Average Queue (ft) 29 0 1 95th Queue (ft) 89 7 9 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 101 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2 31 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 14 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 58 72 105 107 28 17 35 33 41 2 45 69 84 100 14 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 31 1 2 0 14 6 9 0 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 31 173 160 Average Queue (ft) 2 55 43 95th Queue (ft) 15 141 127 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 111 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Right Out 02/21/2020 Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) WB NB SIB R U UL 35 38 81 6 14 21 26 36 60 242 95th Queue (ft) 122 325 325 Intersection: 1000: US 421 & Site Access Movement WB NB NB Directions Served R T T Maximum Queue (ft) 159 11 10 Average Queue (ft) 63 0 0 95th Queue (ft) 122 8 7 Link Distance (ft) 1240 317 317 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 23 69 Average Queue (ft) 2 43 95th Queue (ft) 13 73 Link Distance (ft) 214 14 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 31 Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 112 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements Right Out 02/21/2020 Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 6 95th Queue (ft) 29 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 725 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 113 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements with RO 02/21/2020 Intersection: 3: US 421 Movement SIB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 8 Average Queue (ft) 0 95th Queue (ft) 6 Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream Blk Time ( %) L Queuing Penalty (veh) R Storage Bay Dist (ft) UL Storage Blk Time ( %) TR Queuing Penalty (veh) T Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 400 820 275 41 124 254 255 268 390 384 307 Average Queue (ft) 325 435 200 7 47 72 79 37 362 358 229 95th Queue (ft) 441 710 380 28 102 182 195 177 425 427 436 Link Distance (ft) 1008 309 463 463 307 307 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 27 22 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 361 289 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 17 69 0 0 30 29 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 226 2 0 8 110 2 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 112 140 114 129 117 65 Average Queue (ft) 89 68 22 99 78 26 95th Queue (ft) 101 120 73 140 132 61 Link Distance (ft) 36 1235 54 54 54 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 64 19 13 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 235 75 54 11 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 114 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements with RO 02/21/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SB SB SB L T T 172 69 93 109 11 16 188 44 60 101 101 101 12 0 0 74 0 1 B25 B25 B12 T T T 89 14 11 10 0 0 49 10 8 224 224 419 Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SB SB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 101 87 129 122 42 30 61 83 94 6 71 90 145 145 27 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 55 6 8 0 72 41 56 0 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 116 129 119 Average Queue (ft) 23 33 16 95th Queue (ft) 74 98 69 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 115 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements with RO 02/21/2020 Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB R U T TR UL T T 60 270 192 124 196 447 454 25 124 9 4 26 137 135 54 291 116 87 137 615 616 336 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 710 710 22 977 977 325 3 24 Intersection: 1000: US 421 & Site Access 325 'r; Movement WB SIB SIB B4 B4 Directions Served R T T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 86 414 416 577 592 Average Queue (ft) 31 319 320 310 322 95th Queue (ft) 66 520 529 784 796 Link Distance (ft) 1084 317 317 710 710 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 22 22 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 284 280 6 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 22 67 Average Queue (ft) 2 42 95th Queue (ft) 13 75 Link Distance (ft) 242 8 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 45 Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 116 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2131 with Improvements with RO 02/21/2020 Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 81 Average Queue (ft) 12 95th Queue (ft) 49 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2305 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 117 SimTraffic Report Page 4 0 DAVENPORT 2020 Phase 28(2) Build 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 118 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out 02/20/2020 Intersection: 100: US 421 & CB Side Road /Kings Highway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served R R R R L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 117 76 190 170 137 381 394 85 260 345 343 28 Average Queue (ft) 46 13 103 66 48 151 167 15 126 121 128 3 95th Queue (ft) 98 51 172 146 108 314 337 53 223 266 279 16 Link Distance (ft) 485 500 1507 317 317 1943 1943 1 508 508 508 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 13 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 200 325 58 0 250 600 0 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 0 0 0 245 0 2 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0 0 3 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 400 900 275 58 194 400 422 160 378 373 316 Average Queue (ft) 322 451 197 10 102 167 184 18 187 181 59 95th Queue (ft) 447 769 382 38 192 341 362 92 357 346 219 Link Distance (ft) 1008 Storage Blk Time ( %) 310 0 500 500 317 317 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 0 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 13 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 10 58 0 0 15 18 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 41 245 0 0 3 65 3 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 96 191 171 140 135 60 Average Queue (ft) 78 114 70 110 98 10 95th Queue (ft) 107 174 144 132 140 39 Link Distance (ft) 36 1235 52 52 52 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 65 22 18 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 92 134 108 7 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 119 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out 02/20/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement SIB SIB SIB B25 Directions Served L T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 160 44 61 107 Average Queue (ft) 54 2 3 10 95th Queue (ft) 148 19 28 69 Link Distance (ft) 101 101 101 224 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 13 7 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 49 0 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 58 72 118 115 22 15 34 38 45 1 45 70 97 108 11 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 30 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 7 11 350 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 45 164 163 Average Queue (ft) 3 64 50 95th Queue (ft) 22 140 135 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 120 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out 02/20/2020 Intersection: 700: US 421 & U -Turn Movement WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 84 167 159 28 Average Queue (ft) 55 70 55 5 95th Queue (ft) 87 143 127 22 Link Distance (ft) 19 687 687 687 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 56 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 Queuing Penalty (veh) 51 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement WB NB SIB Directions Served R U UL Maximum Queue (ft) 38 64 74 Average Queue (ft) 7 16 21 95th Queue (ft) 27 44 53 Link Distance (ft) 239 124 5 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 23 Link Distance (ft) 1240 Queuing Penalty (veh) 307 307 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1000: US 421 & Site Access Movement WB NB SIB SB Directions Served R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 143 8 45 49 Average Queue (ft) 65 0 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 124 5 18 23 Link Distance (ft) 1240 317 307 307 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 121 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report AM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements Right Out 02/20/2020 Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB SIB Directions Served R LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 18 69 4 Average Queue (ft) 2 40 0 95th Queue (ft) 13 68 2 Link Distance (ft) 214 14 51 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 31 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 27 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB NB Directions Served L T Maximum Queue (ft) 54 4 Average Queue (ft) 6 0 95th Queue (ft) 33 3 Link Distance (ft) 818 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 906 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 122 SimTraffic Report Page 5 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements with RO 02/20/2020 Intersection: 100: US 421 & CB Side Road /Kings Highway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served R R R R L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 154 124 213 198 147 299 325 75 285 371 369 59 Average Queue (ft) 71 22 136 106 71 110 113 13 152 94 108 9 95th Queue (ft) 135 80 200 188 133 236 247 46 257 244 258 37 Link Distance (ft) 485 463 1507 307 307 1954 1954 2 508 508 508 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 27 24 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 362 313 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 200 325 70 0 250 600 Storage Blk Time ( %) 6 0 1 0 230 0 1 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 1 0 0 1 Intersection: 200: US 421 & Sanders Rd /North State Storage Driveway Movement EB EB EB WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served L LT R LTR UL T TR UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 400 856 275 43 145 232 233 306 398 390 307 Average Queue (ft) 333 489 177 8 60 67 68 32 363 360 210 95th Queue (ft) 456 857 369 29 123 173 177 155 403 410 435 Link Distance (ft) 1008 309 463 463 307 307 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 2 0 27 24 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 362 313 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 200 450 125 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 23 70 0 30 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 76 230 1 8 113 3 Intersection: 300: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U- turn /Manassas Dr Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served LT R R T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 112 144 125 128 120 66 Average Queue (ft) 89 64 25 98 77 25 95th Queue (ft) 101 120 74 133 130 60 Link Distance (ft) 36 1235 54 54 54 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 65 18 14 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 246 73 57 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 123 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements with RO 02/20/2020 Intersection: 301: US 421 & SB Manassas Left and U -turn Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SIB SIB SIB B25 B25 L T T T T 177 65 74 111 19 108 8 13 8 1 190 37 50 49 14 101 101 101 224 224 13 0 0 61 0 79 0 0 Intersection: 302: US 421 & Sharks Eye Lane /NB Manassas Left Turn Movement EB WB SIB SIB SIB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) R T T T R 83 81 128 127 43 30 65 82 94 6 66 87 137 143 29 292 20 61 61 61 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 60 6 9 0 80 39 61 0 Intersection: 303: US 421 & NB Manassas Left Turn Movement NB NB NB Directions Served L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 108 136 102 Average Queue (ft) 34 29 15 95th Queue (ft) 89 96 65 Link Distance (ft) 437 437 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 124 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements with RO 02/20/2020 Intersection: 700: US 421 & U -Turn Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) WB SIB SIB SIB L T T T 98 370 528 254 70 142 145 41 91 296 367 210 19 687 687 687 69 24 0 0 89 19 0 0 Intersection: 800: US 421 & Autumn Care Nursing Driveway Movement WB NB NB NB SIB SIB SIB i Directions Served R U T TR UL T T Maximum Queue (ft) 60 143 61 48 114 689 893 Average Queue (ft) 24 53 2 2 19 179 192 95th Queue (ft) 54 154 43 34 117 782 814 Link Distance (ft) 332 2 710 710 292 1954 1954 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 325 325 Storage Blk Time ( %) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Intersection: 1000: US 421 & Site Access Movement WB SIB SIB B4 B4 Directions Served R T T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 87 421 424 718 731 Average Queue (ft) 33 315 321 348 368 95th Queue (ft) 67 528 529 844 868 Link Distance (ft) 1084 317 317 710 710 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 23 24 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 292 310 10 20 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 125 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report PM 2020 Phase 2132 with Improvements with RO 02/20/2020 Intersection: 1100: US 421 & Harris Teeter Access Movement EB WB Directions Served R LT Maximum Queue (ft) 26 66 Average Queue (ft) 3 43 95th Queue (ft) 16 75 Link Distance (ft) 242 8 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 47 Queuing Penalty (veh) 29 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 1101: US 421 Movement NB Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 71 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2589 160278 Tarin Woods II T. Lee Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 126 SimTraffic Report Page 5 0 DAVENPORT Supporting Documentation 02/24/2020 160278 Tarin Woods II — Technical Memorandum Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 127 A N Harris Teeter Driveway Manassas Drive * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 1014%1 N a N to Z 0 0 N 1 , 40% IN 60% IN v D s 0 s H 55% IN 1 5% IN C F- 0 o LO z r 0 SIGNALIZED p INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Z 0 RIGHT IN / o F RIGHT OUT L O o ROADWAY i I 0 Kings DIRECTIONAL 0 0 Highway CROSSOVER Z a t � �► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT O BLACK = EXISTING o Autumn Care GREY = UNANALYZED 1 Nursing Home GREEN = COMMITTED Z DESTINATION M =O NODE Lo 1 0 Sanders O 0 Road 5% IN �T Z j j o O O 0 0 0 m rn Lo x o 1 0 0 CL 0 F— F CL Q F Z 7 O O 7 O O c M 0 0 0 o O o 0 oN o o 00 o Lo F 1 n 1 OL 100% OUT 0 4-- 60% OUT * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** 1014%1 N a N to Z 0 0 N 1 , 40% IN 60% IN v D s 0 s H 55% IN 1 5% IN C F- 0 o LO x O a+ M r0 E O CL Cl. Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 128 5% IN 1 c Lieutenant Congleton Road A N Harris Teeter Driveway 1 h 1 Z O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 � «i N Co LO 1- L Manassas 70% OUT 1 � 0 Drive Autumn Care Nursing Home F O O N 0 � 1 � �0 0 N a N 40 /o IN �y to 60% IN Z 0 0 N v D s 0 s H Site Access 0 SIGNALIZED p INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER --► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED 1* DESTINATION NODE F Z) O o � V ~ 4-- 50% OUT hk 55% IN 1 Z r 5% IN r O c 1 In I 1— F- + Z Z) O O ° 0 0 o � o co rn 1 L 30% OUT + F- tj Z O O o co o Lo o r` LO 0O 1 0 Sanders 5% IN 0 h Road + Z 0 0 ° o o 0 o o u7 N M u7 Driveway 1 h 1 Z O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 � «i N Co LO 1- L Manassas 70% OUT 1 � 0 Drive Autumn Care Nursing Home F O O N 0 � 1 � �0 0 N a N 40 /o IN �y to 60% IN Z 0 0 N v D s 0 s H Site Access 0 SIGNALIZED p INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER --► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED 1* DESTINATION NODE F Z) O o � V ~ 4-- 50% OUT hk 55% IN 1 5% IN F O c o 0 X O a+ M r0 E O CL Cl. Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 129 5% IN 1 c Lieutenant Congleton Road I 0) "0 N M N 1 IN 0 �1 T co N m O N 10 rn 0 M � rn N N 1 r 1 L 170/237 Fol Kings 73/103 O 0 Highway 1 O V Cl) LO N 00 O 1- O N O O \ coo 1 U L L 6/38 Autumn Care 1 4 Nursing Home 1 rn o L oo co v v v � N N M N N O � O a0 L1/1 M N M J1L 4-0/0 0 0/2 0 Sanders 0 Road 542 / 443 1 0/0�'► �o�\ 149/94 O m N � \ � m M M M d) �coM V O O O N L 0 l`r) 04 1 y 1 L168/83 0 0 0 I It.* X 146 / 55 0/0 Manassas ` l AL 0 0 Drive 19/43 0 0 1/0� 57 / 109 ht fi 48/110 M O O MNM 4/24 moo ln �- d) � N � O w o o IN N a N X O a.+ m E O O. O. Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 130 I SIGNALIZED O 0 INTERSECTION . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ROADWAY DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSEL, GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS 4-- 5/5 r 0/1 Lieutenant 3 / 6 —0 h r► 7/30 00 o C R m o t– z Congleton Road Ll N a o > � G x O *--0/0 Ql > E Autumn Care CL .� Nursing Home c _ 1 1 'c p f0 O O cfl o � O O _ o N d) � O � O (O p O ` 0/0 • -0 /0 0 Sanders 0/0 0 Road o /o—► O � 1 4/13 C ° o mO 0 Harris Teeter N 1 Driveway ^ p co v N M N O O CO N N N L!) ON O N O O 0 L (O O l I ~ ! ~ L 00 I l 4j ~ Lo /O 4-0/ 1 /93 Manassas 0 256/155 �' / 0 0 0 Drive O 0/0 --% 0 y 0 h � f. 32/105 � h 1 49/158► O o O oo11) 0 /0-,% o00 0 0 L N a o > � G x O Y Ql > E O CL p` CL Q c LO 'c p f0 O ~ � O i I SIGNALIZED O INTERSECTION 0 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL s CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSE" GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS 45/145-1 1 O o 4/13' ° o o 4_0/0 O 4j 1 r o 0/0 Lieutenant 41 4 / 13 h t Congleton Road 0/0 --- 10 0/0 % 222 c o 0 0 C 0 f6 O r z x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 131 Cl) 542 /443 1 0 0 0 0 R d) Road 0 /0 N N A 00 153/108 o 00 SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION 0 N UNSIGNALIZED • m 0 0) 00 INTERSECTION ° ° ° RIGHT IN / rof O d) M co co 1 RIGHT OUT � c0 In u2 W 1 M N Driveway ^ ROADWAY L 170 / 237 ^ _ I t O O) M Kings J� DIRECTIONAL 0 E N Highway �r CROSSOVER 03 73/11 M C(O N O co o ~ 0 y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT O O T o 0 00 L N ° ° O °`n ) o BLACK = EXISTING c`no cfl o v co BLUE = FROPOSE" Drive O N O y GREY = UNANALYZED 0 * 6/38 Autumn Care GREEN = COMMITTED .� _ 1 Nursing Home AM / PM PEAKS O � oo 7 � N O M � N N N •�0/0 Sanders 1 33/105 N a Ln 97 / 268 --► x 0 Y � E > 0 p` CL CL Q LO \ O L 0/0 o 4-- 300 / 148 - '- 0/0 h i M N o ' 0 4/24' -. LO v U r v °� o > C H 45/145-1 1 0 0 M o 0 61 / 122 \ O O O 1 ui O O N N x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 132 4— 0/0 5/5 r 0/1 4/13 —0* 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road 542 /443 1 0 0 0 0 R Road 0 /0 N N 153/108 o o N o Harris Teeter 1 1 c co co 1 1 Driveway ^ M _ ^ _ I t O) M _ N M 2 N O M C(O N O 4j U M ~ 0 � O O O Manassas ~ 00 L Drive O 19/43 —.4 0 O y y 0 * * 1 N a Ln 97 / 268 --► x 0 Y � E > 0 p` CL CL Q LO \ O L 0/0 o 4-- 300 / 148 - '- 0/0 h i M N o ' 0 4/24' -. LO v U r v °� o > C H 45/145-1 1 0 0 M o 0 61 / 122 \ O O O 1 ui O O N N x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 132 4— 0/0 5/5 r 0/1 4/13 —0* 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road M N o ' 0 4/24' -. LO v U r v °� o > C H 45/145-1 1 0 0 M o 0 61 / 122 \ O O O 1 ui O O N N x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 132 4— 0/0 5/5 r 0/1 4/13 —0* 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road C H 45/145-1 1 0 0 M o 0 61 / 122 \ O O O 1 ui O O N N x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 132 4— 0/0 5/5 r 0/1 4/13 —0* 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 132 4— 0/0 5/5 r 0/1 4/13 —0* 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road Ll 0 N O p Ln o 0 0 0/0 Autumn Care .� t r Nursing Home N O\ N O N � O 0o r` o M N N coof 1 L 83/50 Site Access 0 v %-0 /0 .-0/0 r 0/0 0/0 0 0 _ Road 0/0�► M _ 1 -) t (* R 4/ 14 N ° ° co r- O 0 O O O Harris Teeter 1 Driveway ^ _ I � t o0 M N � O co O M N O W N M LO O N O O O LO t� O 2 � u7 O O Manassas V L 0 L 193/116 Drive 161 0 0/0 0 0 .11 22 0 0 a Ln x O Y Ql m > E p` Q. CL Q c O (O f0 \ O ~ L 0/0 o X138/83 'r 0/0 35/112 1 h i r 52 / 168 �► O O o 0 /0� 0 0 0 o > � G 48/154-1 *1 1 � 0 0 4/14 ° C 0 0 O 041 N 4/14 0/0 ---► 0/0 C x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 133 I SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION 0 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL s CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSEL, GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS *..-0 /0 ~ 0/0 r 0 /00 /0 1 r O O O j0 po 0 Lieutenant Congleton Road Drive 161 0 0/0 0 0 .11 22 0 0 a Ln x O Y Ql m > E p` Q. CL Q c O (O f0 \ O ~ L 0/0 o X138/83 'r 0/0 35/112 1 h i r 52 / 168 �► O O o 0 /0� 0 0 0 o > � G 48/154-1 *1 1 � 0 0 4/14 ° C 0 0 O 041 N 4/14 0/0 ---► 0/0 C x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 133 I SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION 0 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL s CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSEL, GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS *..-0 /0 ~ 0/0 r 0 /00 /0 1 r O O O j0 po 0 Lieutenant Congleton Road x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 133 I SIGNALIZED 0 INTERSECTION 0 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL s CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSEL, GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS *..-0 /0 ~ 0/0 r 0 /00 /0 1 r O O O j0 po 0 Lieutenant Congleton Road Ll O LO N O 542 / 443 1 r; O � � o Moo Road 0 M 0/0�� N 6/38 Autumn Care .� 153/108 Nursing Home 4 1 t r O O 1 1 N O � o co M N N N N O C�I i N O O N CD r N M � N r O a0 M M M L 83/50 Site 1 Access M O f� d' O N N %-1/1 .-0/0 `' 0/2 N a Ln 1- 542 / 443 1 r; 0 Moo Road 0 M 0/0�� N o > � G O 153/108 ° d \ O N O N � o Harris Teeter M 1 Driveway rn h t rn LO Cl) � M N M O 0 (M M N N O M LMr7 co M M O N Lo j LO O O Manassas ~ 00 L 361/199 Drive '' O '� 0 � 19/43 0 t 36/112 N a Ln 1- 4 / 24 '-. M N ;; 0 0 Moo 61/123 0 M ° oo o > � G x O Y Q1 E > O p` Q. CL Q c O (O f0 \ O ~ L 0/0 o 4-- 284 / 137 j 'r 0/0 48/154 J ti i r' � ;; 0 0 Moo 61/123 m ° oo \ O O LO N N N O � ♦♦ x 0 M m E 0 CL a Q This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 134 I SIGNALIZED O INTERSECTION 0 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY J� DIRECTIONAL s CROSSOVER y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING BLUE = FROPOSEL, GREY = UNANALYZED GREEN = COMMITTED AM / PM PEAKS *..-0 /0 ~ 5/5 r 0/1 4/14 —** -11 3/6 ---► 7/30 �oo c � o 10 f6 O r z Lieutenant Congleton Road N o SPEED LIMIT 55 Highway ° 1'n11 0 J O J � CO U- C.0 L 200' 11 ~ 0 t FULL Kings 100' Z o 1 Road Highway FULL Z LO P 100'in LO 1 1 250' in Phase 213(1) i"I o N N LO M N Harris Teeter 11~ N v Driveway Site Access o > —_ N 1 H (Egress Only) o in O N 225' SPEED _ , SPEED 1 1 0 LIMIT 0 p Sanders 45 300' 0 1 Road 200' LO P 100'in LO 250' in Phase 213(1) 4J 11 Harris Teeter 1 Driveway FULL Z o > —_ H Lf) p O r V 1, 225' SPEED _ , L FULL + LIMIT Manassas Drive 0 0 35 0 10 v O FULL Z 0 ti �» + 4 0 0 rn o M � 4T I I N SPEED LIMIT 55 a e` L O L V> SPEED LIMIT 35 v O This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 9 - 135 I ra INTERSECTION - RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ROADWAY �► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT black = existing grey = unanalyzed green = committed red = proposed in phase 2B(2) blue = proposed in phase 213(1) purple = proposed in phase 2A C Lieutenant Congleton Road C H _ . ITEM: 14- 10 - 1 r _. �a 'i' - � o. f '�-_ 4' ,���• 4 ... _. � — `~ _�_� � + Ti�! t .�„.+4�! it Y AL dl Au 4L - - F I" r i i ! r ti �r A or y 44 J� FEBRUARY 18, 2021 CA- 9 Y P - i P, 7 y I� A I Aw - s Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 10 - 2 III1 FEBRUARY 18, 2020 V U U Lu W U U Z w Y k ' n ail c y W I ITEM: 14-10 - 3 a FEBRUARY 18, 20: Z u W W U 4111. - I k 1 - f wi V b P!v " ` Y R • 40 � fie, r t dL6 , - #' � . - dr.• y r., Q r { r i rip `► rr`1'L7 ` +s. F . _ _ Tai - w _ it 4- �- • T . r `- _ � � -... -t ,„_• r . - - - -� ' � .r° y�. gib+ - r - _ oto JO 14 AP irk _ • .w - -- ' ^ice+ r r ow 46 0 good ' low 4aw T I I =N--- vommO_,� _�4z Op" 7 --1 11 a ■ 4r �I �* c/ .; } • . - . , - "T, _ - 1 V, mb - - _ +. s. will 1 ITEM: 14-10 - 4 rey E fi FEBRUARY 18, 20: Ca U U W Z W U Z U IJ M own - - � `•,'r ' ' . - - - aft- ` .� � � - Ak AP _ IF c/ .; } • . - . , - "T, _ - 1 V, mb - - _ +. s. will 1 ITEM: 14-10 - 4 rey E fi FEBRUARY 18, 20: Ca U U W Z W U Z U IJ M PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 11 - 1 boara OT uommissloners - June l , zuzu ITEM: 14- 12 - 1 ft / CONNECTION TO MYRTLE GROVE ROAD / TARIN WOODS TARIN WOODS, R -5 ZONING LIMITS COMMUNITY BOUNDARY Y—A / • I • • • �F��fF�RR I1 1 / \ I • r- / — 0 a O / I I / \\ _ _ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT / _: 1 ' PART OF REZONING) 1 _ _ I 01 • • • Ole I ' 1 • I - 1 _ -� _i _ • • I • I • n � I _-- -1 • • _ ° I • I • I • I • I • . _� \/ �• �— - - - - /� �- `t M N �\ ` \, ' -- - \ \ . + . 1 - I • I I • • • r Ln -L.. _L.. -L • I I i- _.. _.. \ • \ \ \ o ° I M� / c-' \ D \ I • f oo , / \ — - I _ • ' _- I • • N ° • EXISTING / 0EXISTING i cD ° • a �' ! � • \\ N \\ TARIN WOODS 1 � �. � � " • T _ , / .-- -a -. -- L .. — .. _ .. • I / _ - /- FUTURE .; _ � ' DEVELOPMENT TARIN WOODS 2 \ , - �- � Imo-. .- mr \ • �\ / , of \ co \ \ / / R 10 N \ A, oc) EXISTING �` _ _ • _ - � � � � \, � � • COMMUNITY _ \ \\ \ CLUBHOUSE AND • ■ • i • 7 - /\ / (NOT PART OF � REZONING) / ` _ .. / • AMENITY SPACE • • \ F • • _I c) \ co \ / N lie I ■ — • r �. o , i cc � FUTURE SECONDARY - ,.. _ _ • OPEN GREEN SPACE / AMENITY AREA __ ,� / / - - - - - �• - �, CONNECTION TO CAROLINA BEACH ROAD MINIMUM 50' SETBACK FROM THE v v: -- PROPERTY LINE SHARED WITH ZOO -- -- �, TRACT TO ANY STRUCTURE - C49 �O r l /' :,;► ExISTING - - =� - ZONING (NOT PART OF ,- / MANASSAS DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS (SEE ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2) 044) REZONING). POSSIBLE FUTURE CONNECTION awI ; 6 LANDSCAPED BERM W ADDITIONAL r I I I - , PLANTING ALONG PROPERTY LINE ,. , d EGRESS CONNECTION TO CAROLINA BEACH ROAD -- - -- -- - - - U (CONDITION OF R-5 ZONING) -- - -- ----- - -r - -= -_, - -- =_- - - -__ _-------------------- - - ----------------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - • RIGHT IN - -- -- -- - U cc • RIGHT OUT I I I • LEFT -OVER I z Q i I � ♦ J _ NORTH SCALE: 1" - 200' O -' TARIN WOODS 2 LA Z Q J 0 100 200 400 Wilmington, NC JOB #101 -540 MARCH 19, 2020 boara OT uommissloners - June l , zuzu ITEM: 14- 12 - 1 OPPOSITION MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 13 - 1 May 20, 2020 To: From Re: RECEIVED BY ALL COMMISSIONERS NHC Commissioners 0,L41 SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee Chass Hood, committee member 80C OFF, Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20 -03) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single - family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5, 2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, I am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning fn our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at full capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www. South+CountyNeighborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding community of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. �ey�1c1, ass a(� c1c) Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 1 May 20, 2020 RECEIVED BY To: NHC Commissioners ALL COMMISSIONERS From: SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee 0 0 C OFF Chass Hood, committee member Re: Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20 -03) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single - family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5, 2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, I am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning in our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months.because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at full capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www .SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding community of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. bl� avQ �omc719ss(wgmqj',Cpp� Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 2 May 20, 2020 To: NHC Commissioners RECEIVED BY ALL COMMISSIONERS From: SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee BUC OFF Chass Hood, committee member Re: Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20-03) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single- family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5, 2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, i am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning in our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at full capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www .SouthCountyNeiehborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding community of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter C44170 410166os(�3 M com CA I � - al � - 9 H 'IL.9 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 3 May 20, 2020 To: NHC Commissioners �, RECEIVED BY ALL COMMISSIONERS CF"1VF' From: SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee B O C OFF. Chass Hood, committee member Re: Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20 -03) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single - family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5, 2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, I am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning in our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at fuil capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www .SouthCountvNeiehborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding community of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. blt�� �w A-rv,G� 9 35(6,'9 P1q 7 /,COY✓) Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 4 May 20, 2020 RECEIVED BY ALL COMMISSIONERS To: NHC Commissioners et 'e BOO OFF From: SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee Chass Hood, committee member Re: Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20-03) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single- family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5, 2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, I am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning in our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at full capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www.SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding community of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. MA i 1. co Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 5 May 20, 2020 RECEIVED BY To: County Manager ALL COMMISSIONERS Chris Coudriet From: SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com committee HE OFF. Chass Hood, committee member Re: Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z20 -43) — Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, HD, LLC, to rezone approximately 74.83 acres of land located near the 5800 block of Carolina Beach Road, north of the existing Tarin Woods subdivision, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 499 dwelling units (97 single- family dwellings and 402 townhomes). At their March 5,2020 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval with conditions (6 -0). Dear Commissioners, am writing this cover letter on behalf of the committee and the 225+ citizens who signed this petition so far against rezoning in our area. We have been fighting Hoosier Daddy, LLC, for the better part of two (2) years to stop him from rezoning our area so that he can build moderate -high density units in the approximately 75 acres near our single family homes. We have made it very clear both to him and the planning board that we do not want our neighborhoods negatively impacted by his efforts to rezone in order to improve his profit margins at the expense of our residental quality of life Now that we have been in lock down for several months because of the very real dangers with the Covid -19 virus, it is especially clear just how important it is not to overcrowd residences, schools, and communities. All the four surrounding schools in the district of this proposed rezoning are already at full capacity! In order to open schools again in the Fall, the Board of Education and the county are now working on changes to schedules and reductions in numbers of students in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, buses, etc., in order to keep families, students and staff safe. We can no longer accept overcrowding as a way of life. We must rethink our attitudes of residential development and community building in coordination with forthcoming new requirements. Please read the attached petition and signature information and visit our petition site at www .SouthCountyNeighborsUnited.com for more detailed, specific information on this issue. We respectfully request that all this information be included as evidence against this proposed rezoning from the surrounding communi of concerned citizens. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. ;t YY) c o Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 6 South County Neighbors United HOME SIGN PETITION HISTORY AND ISSUES NEWS AND UPDATES COMMENTS CONTACT For single -fa,.. . NOT THIS! (high - density multiplexes) Aw i p °�► ' / i ; �w: ;lR4 A °ti: . 2w'. f91'4 S' r Iwo, - - ;mss �'"�., Fi- +4�_y_� •- .:F'�` -+r'r �yv +'l +�.+ti.: ,» nl Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 7 Petition to the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners As citizens of New Hanover County living south of Piner Road and east of Carolina Beach Road, we call upon the County Commission to reject the Z20 -03 request to rezone part of the Tarin Woods li development from R -15 to R -5. The construction of 402 townhome units would seriously degrade the quality of life in our community. The Hoosier Daddy LLC company has converted a vast swath of wooded lands into single- family residences called Tarin Woods and Tarin Woods U. Now, instead of completing the plan for Tarin Woods 11, the developer wants to increase profits by building high-density housing on 75 acres of it. Our community has been adamantly opposed to changing the R -15 zoning since it was first requested in 2018. The developer has persistently refused to listen to our objections, bulldozing through the Planning Board much as he bulldozed through our open spaces. The developer claims that the high - density units are consistent with the county's 2016 Comprehensive Plan by virtue of providing a transition between a commercial B -2 district and the extensive residential region east of it. In fact, however, it does not do that. The proposed units at the north end are fully embedded in the residential zone. West and southwest of that, the high - density units would border on B -2 property, but it is wooded wetland that needs no transition to the residential zone. South of that, the proposed townhomes would abut a kind of park - an animal park which you know as Tregembo Zoo. It is not the type of business that requires a transitioning buffer. (We are concerned also that the exotic animals living near the eastern boundary of that park would suffer from a high density of humans living in nearby enclosures. The lights, the noise, and the smell of meat cooking on patio grills would disturb them, to say the least. Lining the perimeter of the animal bark with townhomes is downright inconsiderate.) Only a fraction of the proposed townhome units (south of the zoo) could be construed as constituting a buffering transition between commercial business and single- family residences as recommended in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The rapid development in our region of the county is already straining infrastructure and schools, which are over capacity. Of particular concern is traffic congestion. There is inadequate access to Carolina Beach Road and Myrtle Grove Road, causing serious delays getting into and out of our community. (Those arteries are themselves woefully unfit for additional traffic from 402 new townhomes.) In November of last year, the Planning Board rejected the request for R -5 rezoning because of the inadequacy of Manassas Drive to handle more traffic at the south end of Tarin Woods II. At that time, Hoosier Daddy LLC was already promising the improvements to that road while also suggesting that there would be access to and from the development at the north end of Tarin Woods ll. The Planning Board deemed that combined access to be inadequate. As If to address that, the proposal now under consideration includes a small one -way road for egress next to the south boundary of the zoo. It does nothing to alleviate the traffic congestion on Manassas Drive for residents returning to our neighborhoods. Moreover, at the latest Planning Board hearing on March 5, 2020, Hoosier Daddy LLC refused to commit to seeking additional access at the north end of the development. As a result, the outlook for congestion on Manassas Drive, if the rezoning were to be approved, is even worse now than the outlook was in December when the project was correctly rejected by the Planning Board due to excessive traffic intensification it would cause. We rely on that congested Manassas Drive for access to all of our neighborhoods. We note also that Carolina Beach Road is an important evacuation route ahead of a hurricane or in case of a catastrophic accident at Sunny Point or at the Brunswick Nuclear Plant. It becomes hopelessly congested prior to a hurricane even when there is ample warning. The stretch of highway Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 8 just north of Sanders Road is a major bottleneck with life threatening consequences during an emergency situation. Traffic from 402 additional townhomes there would aggravate the congestion in that bottleneck. Please protect our community from this high - density blight. Just say No to Z20 -03. Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 9 Voter ID '000000338847 '000000351407 '000000182562 1000000388801 '000000059175 '000000339547 '000000339340 Unidentified '000000414279 '000000116631 '000000117099 '000000059807 '000000059806 '000000389617 '000000173705 '000000199061 '000000289661 Unidentified '000000376726 '000000350083 '000000205128 '000000359081 '000000359084 '000000394464 '000000355436 Unidentified '000000138563 '000000119823 '000000168059 '000000065107 '000000144494 '000000039597 '000000062302 '000000357937 '000000349929 '000000025595 '000000371045 '000000359690 '000000359691 '000000153514 List Full name Gayle Nicholson chass hood MArk R Kirchdoerfer Matthew Sherman Tina Shoulars Michael Ticcino Elyse Clifford Ticcino Catherine H Blaylock Kaye Wyman Valarie Fowler Jamie fowler Carolyn ohnmacht Charles ohnmacht John Hill Sharon Lawson Judith W King Maggie Sayers Charles T Ohnmacht Sr JUDY AJUSTICE Kevin Gerity rex burford Vivian Radecsky John Radecsky Janelle Liverman David Knapp Peter Gillman -Bryan KIM MINTZ William Alex Mintz Jennifer Tabor Betty Ann Winn D Gayle Tabor Robert Tregembo Jana Albritton James Simpson Josh Lawrence Carolyn Hatcher Donna king Jeremy Shane lovin Karen Byrd lovin Tracy Gourville Page 1 Street address 246 Inlet Point Drive 777 liberty landing way 6147 Tarin Rd 1125 Lt. Congleton Rd 6137 Shiloh Dr 826 Riddick Court 826 Riddick Court 6147 Tarin Rd 523 Manassas Drive 2540 Yolanda lane 2540 Yolanda lane 2540 Yolanda lane 2540 Yolanda lane 6113 Chancellorsville Dr 6126 Shiloh Dr 201 Nantucket Ct. 6214 Appomattox Dr. 2540 Yolanda dr 4621 NORWICH RD 6040 Chancellorsville Dr 6309 Stearman Court 6001 Appomattox 6001 Appomattox drive 601 Manassas Dr 6017 Culdees Ln. 5617 Myrtle Grove Rd. 614ANTIETAM Drive 614 ANTIETAM Drive 6130 Shiloh Dr 6046 Shiloh Dr. 6130 Shiloh Dr 1332 Hill Valley Walk 7001 WAX MYRTLE CT 824 Ovates Lane 6070 Chancellorsville Dr 1209 Lacewood Ct. 786 Liberty landing way 6213 Rowsley street 6213 Rowsley street 117 Royal Oak DR Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 10 '000000355450 '000000275942 '000000275941 '000000397999 '000000326975 '000000242116 '000000169911 '000000356998 '000000356999 '000000360830 '000000263358 '000000063940 '000000356309 '000000338903 '000000244837 '000000286076 '000000402780 '000000127367 '000000254356 '000000253015 '000000174929 '000000365403 '000000305436 '000000305438 '000000296379 '000000360157 '000000366500 '000000253058 '000000350283 '000000363225 '000000177619 '000000277710 '000000353596 '000000137551 '000000339756 '000000104023 Unidentified 1000000388258 '0000 '00005075 '000000115844 1000000196796 List Judith McInerney Chris Waugh Angela Waugh Pamela H. Price Andrew Mark Hudson Jr. Holly Morris Reynolds Ben Whitlock Jeff Holmes Jeri Holmes Susan Markantone Kathleen O'Sullivan Joseph Nuccio Ashlee Williams Ted Reighard Ben Jensen Alexis Kostyshyn Jason Tucker Phillip Davis Betty L Campese Jeremy Bruce Morgan Catherine Hudson Cole Hudson Diane Laskowski Leonard Laskowski Brenda Mohn Joseph Gelpi Christen Gelpi Kate Morgan Lindsay Allmon Carol Seitz Lydia Perceil Sarah Kunath Edward Keeler Jr GAYLE MIKSCH BROWN Ann Bartolomeo TRUDY MAUS William Ahern Jordan Coffin Caroline Gillman -Bryan Tift J Tounsley Teresa Taylor 700 Liberty Landing Way 6130 Lydden Road 6130 Lydden rd 1575 Grove Ln 615 anti etam d r 6417 Sentry Oaks Drive 6204 Sentry Oaks Dr. 6008 Culdees LN 6008 Culdees LN 6071 Chancellorsville Dr 6261 Sentry Oaks Drive 6261 Sentry Oaks Drive 6301 Sentey Oaks Drive 1125 Whispering Doe Dr. 1008 Whispering Doe Dr 6325 Stearman Court 6405 New Hope Place 789 liberty landing way 6419 Gammon Ct 6016 Culdees Lane 1134 Matteo Dr #201 1.134 Matteo Dr#201 1113 Deer Hill Dr 1113 Deer Hill Drive 6257 Sentry Oaks drive 6086 Chancellorsville Dr 6086 Chancellorsville Dr 6016 Culdees Lane 1005 Deer Hill Dr 805 Liberty Landing Way 1103 Linkway Lane 6416 Ehler Ct 708 Liberty Landing Way 6052 Chancellorsville Dr 6512 Rustling Leaves Way 6404 Ehler Court 6032 Chancellorsville Dr 6135 Tarin Rd 5617 Myrtle Grove Rd. 6240 Sentry Oaks Drive 1121 LT. CONGLETON Rd Page 2 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 11 '000000187496 '000000388865 '000000245025 '000000354437 '000000357447 '000000280213 '000000349169 '000000368451 '000000349425 Unidentified Unidentified '000000352733 '000000260062 '000000242557 '000000184117 '000000269671 Unidentified '000000395789 '000000143066 '000000205200 '000000179820 '000000400623 '000000385524 '000000154649 '000000152294 '000000053192 '000000286367 '000000219614 '000000332377 '000000251195 Unidentified '000000351548 '000000414712 '000000389643 '000000305727 '000000356495 Unidentified '000000405959 '000000406197 '000000247986 '000000425674 List Rebecca Frederick Claudia Sherman Erin Watson Daniel Haisley Linda Boldt Christine Layton Sandra Nyers -Lardi Henry J. SALWIERZ Istvan Nyers Kara Gaspari Luise phifer Agnieszka Nassar Joe Hawksworth Laurel Andros Angela Tew Donna Mcnaughton Samantha Lewis G. Thomas Armstrong Jane McCall James Gavin Laura Cameron Getman Kaitlyn Pate Cathy Huntley Timothy Bruce Smith Lori Barnes Linda Teachey Cross Megan Hall Robert Malkmus Melissa Peeler Barbara Ann Sutton Theresa geedy Tracey Eavenson Brad Newcomer Angela Seymour Melissa Chadwick Maria Haisley Ana Beatriz Molina Jackson Mindy Volesky Lane Volesky Christina Lanier Jessica Wold Page 3 6233 Sweet Gum dr 1125 Lt Congleton Road 1306 faulkenberry rd 1117 Lt Congleton Rd 825 Riddick Court 832 Ovates lane 6149 Sand Ridge Ave 1124 Lt Congleton Rd 6149 Sand Ridge Ave 6121 Sweet Gum Dr 1128 Lt Congleton rd 6124 Tarin Rd 805 Riddick Court 6013 Culdees Lane 6111 Tarin road 1124 Lt Congleton road 1117 canopy way 831 Ovates In. 6253 Appomattox drive 4633 Laver Drive 405 Julia Dr 1132 canopy way 812 ovates In 1108 Canopy Way 6130 Ambleside Drive 6050 Otter Tail Trail 1105 Lt. Congleton Rd 6026 Tarin Road 6120 Tarin Road 6208 Sweet Gum Drive 6332 lenoir drive 6127 Tarin Rd 844 Ovates Lane 1133 LT Congleton Road 1104 Canopy Way 1117 Lt. Congleton Rd 6021 tarin road 6212 sweet gum Dr 6212 sweet gum drive 1604 Soaring Spirit Drive 6141 Sweet Gum Drive Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 12 List '000000226539 James Lane 6103 Tarin Road 1000000155900 Catherine Pastore 817 Riddick Court '000000172829 Albert Pastore 817 Riddick Ct. 1000000214406 Heidi Lawrence 1129 Lt Congleton Rd '000000193072 Shannon Chandarana 4641 Laver Dr '000000235336 Amber Piner 6228 Sentry Oaks Drivr 1000000229112 Ashley Campese 6004 Culdess lane 1000000381993 Patrick M Lane 6130 Tarin Rd 1000000422788 Seth Burgess 6128 Tarin Road '000000237260 Hannah Hales 809 Riddick Court Unidentified Jennifer Darnell 4613 Laver Drive 1000000230855 Wendy Williams 714 Clarendon Ave '000000367008 Darren Lee Callaway 822 Riddick ct 1000000379076 Margaret Simpson 824 Ovates Ln 1000000433853 Ann -Marie Lamanna 1653 Sand Ridge Ave '000000330958 Amber Willenbring 717 Liberty Landing Way 1000000285129 Jacki Andrews 1605 Maltwood Drive '000000434676 Denise Lander 1109 Sweetshrub Court 1000000350041 Luca Coletao 110 N.6TH ST. #2 1000000425223 Dawn Decollewaert 821 Riddick Ct '000000419895 Brian James Pate 1132 Canopy Way 1000000338793 Paul Sommers 246 Inlet Point Dr '000000385908 Charles nielsen 1136 it. Congleton 1000000432508 Ali Greiner 1129 Lt Congleton Rd '000000217524 Brittany Brooks 6202 Shiloh dr 1000000283470 Jan - Michael Sutton 6208 Sweet Gum Drive 1000000425850 Lidija Sisak 6204 Sweet Gum Dr '000000430817 Justin Sisak 6204 Sweet Gum Dr 1000000401923 Dan Reese 6115 Tarin rd '000000361175 Kevin Nixon 6021 Culdees In 1000000065556 Stephanie Martin 7204 mullet ct 1000000346600 Janet Byrd 6122 Tarin Road '000000177300 Kim Percell 1103 Linkway Ln '000000363211 Mark J. Berman 6124 Sweet Gum Drive 1000000422304 Michelle bozeman 3205 Reminisce rd '000000424689 Edith Seemadray 1008 Lt. congleton rd '000000367952 Jonathan Mailey 6024 Culdees Ln '000000186421 Marilyn watkins 226 5th Ave N. Kure Beach '000000334682 Letitia M. Hall 4609 Laver Dr 1000000421411 Jill Y. Stephens 1116 Canopy Way '000000219132 Melissa Harman 860 Ovates Lane Page 4 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 13 Unidentified '000000255464 '000000212116 Unidentified '000000348991 '000000370229 '000000369890 '000000194634 Unidentified '000000102145 Unidentified '000000355437 '000000339270 '000000398008 '000000176281 '000000220939 '000000406088 '000000384020 '000000361718 '000000050004 '000000430955 Unidentified '000000357440 Unidentified '000000359828 '000000281191 '000000357187 '000000022822 '000000339031 '000000237308 '000000360721 '000000360719 '000000241306 '000000347516 '000000392011 '000000390319 '000000341029 '000000340946 '000000352778 '000000198031 '000000235567 List Derek Harman Kim Mayo Erin Montgomery Jack P Wissman Jr Amy Howell Sarah Gilbert Samantha Gardner Hannah Lewis Nicole Klund Thomas Lawrence Toby Ronan Daly Beth Knapp Nathan Henry Michael Smith Emily Foland Mark Foland Brett Crimmel Amy Lane Barbara Lockhart Hattie McIver Michelle A Vernier Michael carson Robert Boldt Jay Faircloth pat tubbs Linda Estep Robert Tubbs Paul Taber Atha Lenell Henry C. Henry Linda Smith Teresa Stanley Dennis Stanley Stephen Eames Hillary Haynes Stephen Vorwerk Andrew Ruiz Julie Gabbard Jason Gabbard Elynor May Monks Dominic Campese Jamison Ruoff 860 Ovates Lane 6112 Tarin Rd Colquitt Dr 6109 Sand Ridge Ave 110 N.6TH ST. #2 6113 sweet gum dr 6232 Sweet Gum Dr 7214 Chipley Drive 6205 Sweet Gum Drive 6605 Oliver court 5613 Onyx Ct 6017 Culdees Lane 6225 Shiloh Dr. 1575 Grove Ln 6009 Culdees Lane 6009 Culdees Lane 6128 Sweet Gum Drive 6130 Tarin Rd 804 Ovates Ln 820 Rivage Promenade 122 chimney lane 122 chimney lane 825 Riddick Court Sand Ridge Ave 6416 Sentry Oaks Dr 306 Mcquillan dr 6416 Sentry Oaks Drive 907 South Lumina Ave 6225 Shiloh Dr. 729 Settlers Lane 6051 Chance llorsvil le Drive 6051 Chancellorsville Drive 339 seaview 1320 deer hill Dr 1320 deer hill Dr 4609 Laver Dr. 859 Ovates Lane 859 Ovates Lane 853 Ovates lane 6004 cuidees lane 1141 Canopy Way Page 5 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 14 '000000406835 '000000406868 '000000364392 '000000308669 '000000190671 Unidentified '000000416298 '000000217681 '000000215428 '000000188243 '000000405914 '000000405913 1000000142986 '000000429875 '000000321797 '000000212951 '000000337613 1000000107446 '000000220875 '000000370885 1000000349971 '000000360831 '000000361995 '000000361936 '000000362899 Joshua Phanco Melinda Phanco Eric OReilly Logan White Thompson Drew O'Reilly Ashley Ellender Michael Gledhill Corey Yingling Michael D McCulley Jr Jill Ann McCulley Jackie Everett Carl Everett Jamie James David James Brittni Ohm Christy Strickland Mitch Thompson Charles Williams Patricia Peterson Richard E King Leslie Garris Michael Markantone Patricia M Morin Joel Merritt Morin Joseph Barry List 1137 Canopy Way 1137 Canopy Way 6110 Lydden Road 6106 Lydden Rd 6110 lydden rd 781 Liberty Landing Way 6107 lydden road 6114 Lydden Rd 6102 Lydden Road 6102 Lydden Road 6118 Lydden Rd 6118 Lydden Rd 6119 Lydden rd 6119 lydden rd 6123 Lydden Rd 6139 Lydden Road 6106 Lydden Rd. 6110 Shiloh 528 Manassas Drive 786 Liberty landing way 6013 Chancel lorsvil le Drive 6071 Chancellorsville Dr 793 Liberty Landing Way 793 Liberty Landing Way 6060 Chan cell orsviIle drive Page 6 Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 15 Comments from the petition signatures "Our surrounding neighborhoods have been fighting this rezoning since the developer started this high density push. We don't want iti Please respect our decisions on this." "He needs to stop trying to petition this. " "NO11111MI!! M" "Get their trucks and equipment off of Manassas drive. We don't need more vehicles on our street this is not Carolina beach road this is a residential area or at least it was. Finish your single family houses and get out of here." "I will move If this comes to pass. I did not sign up for this when I moved hen:. " "Please vote NO to rezoning. Thank you." "Stop it" "no no no too much density already" "Traffic Is already a nightmarelI Please consider where these children will go to school temporary classrooms?? This is a residential neighborhood let's keep It that way." "No high density in my area" "This is an ongoing problem. something needs to be done to collaborative to co -ordinate these intense developments with the available Infrastructure and build out with the scope of range of practical expansions that are realistic. The road utility and school systems are quickly getting to their limits. Maybe a moratorium to get everyone's attention might the the best stopgap. This requires real governance and leadership. It is not simple. Requiring real environmental impact statement like the pollution laws use might also be a possibility. There are no simple answersl" "Battle Park entrance should not be allowed to changed at the request of the developer. Residents need to be involved in all changes related to the subdivision" "I have seen our neighborhood increase from a nice country lane of neighbors to a metropolis of strangers zooming around the road. Our home values have decreased instead of the promised raise and the water table has already dried up once. I definitely vote NO. " "This type of congestion is ridiculous. There's no infrastructure, roads, schools, etc in place to support this development." "This is not what we need in New Hanover County. The infrastructure is woefully behind all the development that has already occurred. Long time residents who have paid county taxes for a long time are being pushed aside in favor of additional tax revenue. Slow down catch up, think about the future quality of life." "Infrastructurelroads can't handle the density of growth with existing zoning we sure don't need higher density. " "This developer has already destroyed the quality of life for those of us who abut this monstrosity of a development. Adding high - density units would only compound the problem his single - family residential units have caused to this point as well stated in the petition. Drive through Tarin Woods II and It becomes abundantly clear that the point is to maximize profits with NO thought to building an aesthetically pleasing community or one which co -exists in harmony with the other communities surrounding it. PLEASE STOP THISIIr, "Please stop developing! The earth needs us to keep the trees! Our community needs more nature and less cieartuttingl " "Applicant has not provided any {Manned strategy to relieve ingress and egress congestion of traffic onto Carolina Beach Rd. caused by the Increased density of zoning change. The possibility of another egress through a possible planned strip mall is inadequate." "The road conditions are already comprised and dangerous to the residents and children that live in the neighborhood. Please do not allow such a large amount of traffic to be added to this already existing problem. " "Reject" "Public meeting in question due to covid -19 ? ?" "Please reject the request Z20 -03 to rezone 75 acres for high density multiplex housing units in Tarin Woods N. There Is already too much development in this area and to add this would overt arcpo or "T%� djMgn� "I" looked at for development by greed and lack ITEM: 14- 14 - 16 of desire for community. " "Please consider rejecting the plan for multi housing project in the Tarin Woods area. Our roads schools and access points are not equipped to handle development like this. " "This area is not build to support the volume of traffic this would generate without substantial changes to ingress and egress paths." "We bought here under the impression it will all be single family homes." "Please reject these Townhomes. " "Please no high - density housing in this area. Traffic is congested enough already!" "no townhomes!" "Stop tearing down the wildlife" "Please take this petition seriouslyl" "Not a good place) Too many people for that areal Do better planning. Stop just looking at dollar signs!" "We bought in this neighborhood being told it was going to all be single family homes." "Please do not let this slide through at this time when everyone's attention is focused on just surviving." "Vote NO! Too much traffic overcrowded schools and damage to the environment!" "The developer needs to stick to the original plans and promises. Period." "Look at the local schools south of Wilmington that are over crowded. Roads and sewer are always a concern: . "Please do not approve this)!!" "Please help Tarin Woods remain a neighborhood." "Enough already." "Just say noll We can barely get in thru and out of the neighborhood. We are congested enough now. Sooner or later a child is going to get hit by a vehicle. We have had accidents with kids getting hurt." "Dort do itl Save the land! " "The monkey Junction area Is already over crowded with a new development going in across the street from this proposed one. This is a horrible idea" "Surely the event of the last month illustrate the danger of high population density. South Wilmington has great potential. Once the condensed housing is approved theme is no going back. Single family homes and more green space are the key to vital neighborhoods." "Please don't change the neighborhood) We love it the way it isl" "Enough already" "Stop this" "no do a moratorium on this until all infrastructure is taken care of." "Carolina Beach Road is already so congested it is totally ridiculous to even think about adding more to the problem that already exists" "They need to stop taking down all the greenery in the area. This eventually will have an effect on the air quality in the area. This potentially will add another '3 000 vehicles to this area that area roads will not accommodate:" "One of the blg reasons I bought a house in Battle Park was the big lots. I would hate to see it changed to an R5 neighborhood with a bunch of multi family housing. That would ruin the area and property value will suffer. Please don't pass this silly proposal." 'We need your help. Please consider our plea and say no to the developer. Thank you." "Overkill" "Please don't do it. Not here. " "No townhomes" Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 17 "Please[" "Please stop the construction and deforestation it's ruining our environment. We have enough traffic in this area already " "This development should be single family homes only. In keeping with current structures" "These high density ghetto type dwelling will promote a lot of new crime In our area." "Please stop this over development in Wilmington. We need our green space and clean air. Lets be the first community to say money is not our God. I've lived here sixteen years and this is no longer the community we want. We came here to enjoy our senior years, battle park was perfect until Tarin Woods came along, and now the developer wants to completely ruin what's left of our little piece of heaven, please stop them." "Stop the over developing, single family homes only, stop the building." Board of Commissioners - June 1, 2020 ITEM: 14- 14 - 18