HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-25 Special Meeting
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 33
JANUARY 25, 1999
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners held a Special Meeting with the New
Hanover County Board of Education on Monday, January 25, 1999, at 6:45 p.m. in the Cape Fear
Museum Williston Auditorium, 814 Market Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioner Buzz Birzenieks; Commissioner Ted Davis, Jr.;
Commissioner Charles R. Howell; Vice-Chairman Robert G. Greer; Chairman William A. Caster;
County Manager, Allen O’Neal; County Attorney, Wanda M. Copley; and Clerk to the Board, Lucie
F. Harrell.
Members present from the New Hanover County Board of Education were: Chairman Edward
B. Higgins; Vice-Chairman Donald S. Hayes; and Board Members Steven M. Bilzi, Oscar A. Graham,
Debbie Keck, Nancy Wigley, and James A. (Andy) Wells.
Chairman Caster and Chairman Higgins called their respective boards to order.
Chairman Caster welcomed everyone present, and he requested all persons attending the
meeting to introduce themselves.
Chairman Caster commented on the difficult challenges facing local Boards of Education and
Boards of County Commissioners throughout the nation, and he stated that many of these items have
created sharp conflicts between the two boards. In some of these communities, the last local school
bond issue failed. Chairman Caster stressed the importance of not allowing this type of situation to
occur in New Hanover County, and he encouraged the Boards to meet more frequently to keep an
open line of communication to jointly address the needs of the schools.
Chairman Higgins agreed with Chairman Caster’s comments and he expressed appreciation
to the Commissioners for calling the meeting. He noted that in the past conflict areas had developed
between the New Hanover County Board of Education and New Hanover County Board of
Commissioners; however, this was a different Board that was committed to work toward one
common goal, which is the education of children in New Hanover County.
Chairman Caster passed out a copy of an article from the January issue of Governing
Magazine entitled, Schools + Taxes + Politics + Chaos. He requested members of both boards to
read the article.
DISCUSSION OF THE PILOT’S RIDGE PROJECT
Chairman Caster commented on meeting last week with Chairman Higgins, Dr. John Morris
and County Manager O’Neal to discuss the funding needed to begin the Pilot’s Ridge Project. It was
agreed that New Hanover County would appropriate the recently debated $3,200,000 to this effort
if the Board of Education would fund $1,000,000.
Chairman Higgins reported on speaking with the Finance Officer and the members of the
Board of Education about the proposed agreement. He stressed the importance of moving forward
with the project because of the tight time frame, and he said the Finance Officer has been instructed
to prepare a resolution to approve a budget transfer of $1,000,000, which will have to be approved
by the Board of Education.
Mr. Oscar Graham MOVED, SECONDED by Mr. Steve Bilzi to adopt the resolution to
approve the $1,000,000 budget transfer.
Chairman Higgins opened the floor for discussion.
Ms. Mary Hazel Small, Finance Officer of the New Hanover County School System,
explained that $1,000,000 would be appropriated from the Fund Balance and transferred to the
Capital Outlay Fund to divide between the high school and middle school project budgets for site
development.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 34
JANUARY 25, 1999
Mr. Donald Hayes requested Dr. John Morris, Superintendent of Schools, to comment on the
budget transfer.
Dr. Morris expressed concern for the project being delayed and being $2,000,000 over
budget. He noted that the $1,000,000 transfer could be used to improve Snipes Elementary School
or provide a track at Williston School; however, the money does come from the taxpayers and it is
imperative that funding is provided for the start-up.
Ms. Debbie Keck commented on forfeiture funds and asked if the $1,000,000 could be
removed from this account.
Ms. Small responded there was a fund and forfeiture revenue account budgeted to fund the
School System; however, no discussion has occurred on removing the $1,000,000 from this account.
Mr. Bilzi commented on the windfall that was suppose to have been received by the School
System from the sale of vehicles, and he requested a brief report on this issue.
Ms. Small reported the law was recently changed to allow the School System to sell the
vehicles more quickly. In the past, the court case had to be resolved before a vehicle could be sold.
By the time the court case was concluded, the fines and storage fees were more than the value of
vehicle. Under the amended law, it is hoped that revenue will be generated by this program. As of
this date, there are approximately 100 vehicles that have not been sold.
Vice-Chairman Greer urged the Board of Education to sell the vehicles as soon as possible,
and he offered to assist in anyway possible.
Ms. Keck requested an explanation of the $3,200,000 that has been discussed for the past
several months.
Vice-Chairman Greer explained that when the bond issue was set at $125,000,000, the School
System decided to use $3,200,000 of bond proceeds for land acquisition. When the County decided
to purchase 210 acres instead of the 50 acres sought by the School System, the County purchased
the 210 acres and financed the acquisition instead of using the $3,200,000 of bond proceeds obligated
by the School System. The total cost of the land was $5,500,000. Since the County used another
financing mechanism to acquire the land, it was felt the $3,200,000 should be placed in the County
budget. However, some members of the Board of Education feel that the School System was not
responsible for the County deciding to use another form of financing, and after discussion, the County
is willing to appropriate the $3,200,000 to infrastructure needs of the Pilot’s Ridge Project. In order
to provide the infrastructure for the project, $7,200,000 will be needed. The County is willing to
contribute $6,200,000, which includes the $3,200,000, if the Board of Education will contribute
$1,000,000.
Commissioner Birzenieks requested an explanation of funding for the athletic facility at
Hoggard High School.
Chairman Higgins explained some money from the recent bond issue will be used as well as
$2,800,000 from the State bond issue.
Dr. Morris reported when the $3,200,000 was not needed, there was discussion about the
money being used for other needs. This money was never removed from the School Budget. There
was an assumption on the part of the School System that this money could be used for other
educational projects.
Vice-Chairman Greer advised that the Board of County Commissioners earmarked the
$3,200,000 for a vocational education school; therefore, the money would not have been taken away
from the School System. Also, when deciding how to use the money, discussion occurred on whether
the School System or New Hanover County should oversee the grading, road work and
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 35
JANUARY 25, 1999
other infrastructure needs for the Pilot’s Ridge Project. Vice-Chairman Greer recommended allowing
the County to oversee the project with input from the School System since the County has engineers
on staff.
Mr. Bill Hance, Assistant Superintendent of Operations for New Hanover County Schools,
explained that infrastructure funding for projects inside the school sites was a separate issue from the
$7,200,000 needed for projects outside the school sites. The infrastructure funding within the school
sites has been included in the School budgets. The School Administrative Staff feels that the grading
package for the entire site should be performed by one contractor. Money will be removed from the
budgets for the school sites and added to the grading project. The remaining infrastructure within
the school sites will be performed by the contractor who builds the schools.
Further discussion followed on having one contractor to perform the sewer infrastructure and
drainage for the entire facility. Mr. Hance responded that one contractor would be used inside the
school sites to perform the sewer and plumbing work.
Assistant County Manager Dave Weaver explained that the design of the drainage plan would
be sized to take into account how the drainage would be handled by the contractor performing the
work within the school sites.
Commissioner Birzenieks requested an explanation of how the $7,200,000 would be used.
Assistant County Manager Weaver responded the $7,200,000 would fund the following items:
(1) construction of the roadway; (2) intersection improvements at River Road and Carolina Beach
Road; (3) sewer construction; and (4) a drinking water system which includes a storage tank,
drainage, grading, clearing and sedimentation erosion control.
County Manager O’Neal presented the following components of the $7,200,000:
$3,200,000 set aside by the County
$1,000,000 from the County’s Special Revenue Fund for Schools
$1,500,000 from the County’s General Fund Balance
$ 500,000 from the Water & Sewer Fund Balance
$1,000,000 from the School’s Fund Balance
Mr. Oscar Graham requested Mr. Eddie Anderson, Facilities Director, to comment on the
proposed funding and project oversight of Pilot’s Ridge.
Mr. Anderson reported on discussing the project with Assistant County Manager Weaver and
he advised economically it only made sense for one contractor to grade the entire 210 acres. All
persons have agreed for the County to coordinate the grading and outside infrastructure needs. As
indicated by Assistant County Manager Weaver, other parts of the infrastructure are included in the
$7,200,000. Also, there are roads, parking, and utilities within the school sites. This issue has not
been resolved. He recommended allowing the County Staff and School Staff to continue to work
with the design team to prepare a proposal to be presented to both boards.
Vice-Chairman Greer asked Mr. Anderson if the County was assigned to oversee the roads,
parking and utilities within the school sites, what type of problems could be encountered.
Mr. Anderson responded that discussion has been held on minimizing the number of contracts
and contractors on the 210 acres. The packages being proposed will actually increase the number
of contractors because there will be a site clearing and grading contract that is being bid as well as
the infrastructure contract, and school construction contract. In order to minimize the number of bid
packages and number of contractors on site, the smaller package, which is the site infrastructure
package, could be combined with the larger of the three projects in the school building package. To
remove the site infrastructure work from within the school sites into an overall infrastructure package
would require many items to be completed before 2001. Storage and staging
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 36
JANUARY 25, 1999
will have to be addressed because the building is over 400,000 square feet; therefore, the control and
operation of the construction phase should be under the control one general contractor.
Vice-Chairman Greer agreed that one contractor should oversee the construction of the
schools, and he stated that one contractor should oversee the parking lots, drainage and paving
projects.
Mr. Anderson explained that the parking lot will be the major storage and staging area for
school construction. The driveways used to bring in heavy equipment should be the responsibility
of the general contractor because he not only maintains the roads but he is responsible for any damage
at the completion of construction.
Vice-Chairman Greer expressed concern for the project becoming more complicated.
Chairman Higgins explained that originally, the School System assumed the entire project
would be supervised by the School System with the County transferring money once the bids were
awarded and the project began. Now, it appears the County will oversee the infrastructure, and he
asked why the School System was not administering the entire project.
Assistant County Manager Weaver explained that when discussion first began with the School
Staff, the County was concerned about meeting the time schedule established by the School System.
In an effort to meet this time frame, it was agreed for the County to perform the outside
infrastructure.
Vice-Chairman Greer commented on the numerous parking lots for the schools and parks and
he said it would not make sense to split the projects.
Assistant County Manager Weaver advised that Staff did not have time to address other issues
regarding infrastructure. The grading and clearing project was the main focus because of the need
to start the project. Staff feels the other infrastructure projects can be blended.
Mr. Hance recommended allowing the County Staff and School Staff to continue to meet and
discuss other infrastructure needs. An agreement has been made on Phase I of the project under the
supervision of the County.
Commissioner Birzenieks said that he was not concerned about who would supervise the
project as long as the project was performed quickly and as economically as possible within the
August 2001 time frame. He recommended appropriating the money so the County Staff and School
Staff could coordinate the project.
Chairman Higgins called for a vote on the motion to approve the $1,000,000 budget transfer.
Upon vote, the motion was unanimously approved by the Board of Education.
Chairman Caster spoke on the need to move forward with the project, and he expressed
appreciation to the Board of Education for appropriating the necessary funding.
DISCUSSION OF FUTURE SCHOOL BOND ISSUES
Chairman Caster reported that the Board of County Commissioners has agreed not to mention
a dollar amount when discussing future school bond issues. He requested Chairman Higgins to
comment on how the Board of Education feels about this matter.
Chairman Higgins advised that the last bond issue was for new construction. Future bond
issues will be needed for replacements, renovations and additions to schools. There are several
schools with age, and there are concerns for ADA compliance. Any school bond issue should clearly
demonstrate the needs for each local school. It appears another bond issue will be sought in October
or November 2001.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 37
JANUARY 25, 1999
Commissioner Birzenieks stressed the importance of sizing bond issues to adequately address
school needs. He expressed concern for the last bond issue being undersized, and he stated, in his
opinion, the citizens would have voted for at least a $150,000,000 bond issue. Once a figure is
presented to the public, that figure cannot be changed. During the last bond issue, a consultant was
hired to find out how much the citizens were willing to tax themselves to fund schools. He urged the
Board of Education to research any future bond issue with clearly defining the needs of the schools
and determining the amount of money that will be supported by the citizens before sizing the bond
issue.
Chairman Higgins agreed and stated he felt the County Commissioners truly believe in
education and have enough faith in the ability of the members of the Board of Education to document
school needs for a future bond issue.
Commissioner Birzenieks stated that annexation would also play a major role in whether
future bond issues would be supported by the citizens.
Vice-Chairman Greer commented on the need to support the schools and stated, however,
the time has come for both boards to think differently because our society cannot continue to fund
the money needed for schools. In the past few years, a statewide school bond issue was passed with
New Hanover County receiving $20,000,000; a local school bond issue was passed for $39,900,000;
and two years ago a $125,000,000 school bond issue was passed. In the future, the citizens are going
to vote against bond issues as recently done in Henderson and Dare counties. New Hanover County
does not want to get in this position; therefore, some re-thinking of the amount of money to be spent
on schools will have to occur. Currently, Cape Fear Community College has not used $28,300,000
of the last bond issue and the School System has not used $111,000,000 of the last bond issue. This
means the taxpayers have not begun to pay for these bond issues. Once the taxpayers are assessed
for the bond issues, they may not be willing to support future bond issues. Also, the General
Assembly has removed four cents from the sales tax on food; however, the two cents on food that
is appropriated to counties to be used for schools may be removed. If the two-cent tax is removed,
this will produce a shortfall in County funding for the schools.
Superintendent Morris advised that during the last week, he had spent 35 hours working with
Staff to seek more efficient and effective ways to use current resources. The configuration of schools
has been reviewed to utilize space and use every dollar locally.
Vice-Chairman Greer stated that he did not intend for the remarks to imply that the local
School System was not operating efficiently because State and Federal regulations govern how
schools have to spend money, such as the classroom size, ADA compliance, asbestos removal, and
other items that require large sums of money. Neither the Board of Education or the Board of County
Commissioners can control these issues, and the burden unfortunately falls on the local taxpayers.
Mr. Bilzi agreed with Vice-Chairman Greer and he stressed the importance of both boards
seeking creative ways to work cooperatively in resolving the school needs without having to increase
taxes.
Commissioner Howell commented on visiting the J. C. Roe Elementary School and
Coddington Elementary School, and he stated the difference between the two schools was
unbelievable. Concern was expressed for J. C. Roe not having the same amenities, such as a decent
library, because the children were not from an affluent community. He stated the public needs to be
informed about these needs so they will be more willing to vote for school bond issues.
Mr. Graham expressed appreciation to Commissioner Howell for bringing up this issue, and
he stated there are many schools with poor libraries and other facilities.
In conclusion, it was generally agreed that any future bond issue must be thoroughly
researched and it must be determined prior to being placed on the ballot that the public will support
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 38
JANUARY 25, 1999
the amount of the bond issue. The failure of a bond issue would be detrimental to New Hanover
County and its educational system.
DISCUSSION OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
Commissioner Birzenieks spoke on vocational education courses offered by the schools and
he asked if these courses were completed, did these students qualify to become computer operators,
licensed electricians, skilled carpenters, or auto mechanics.
Superintendent Morris advised that he did not think high schools should be responsible for
producing a licensed electrician or skilled carpenter. There are students at New Hanover, Laney, and
Hoggard High Schools that are in the process of constructing a house. These students enrolled in
construction trades in the 9th grade and other construction courses in the 10th grade. During the
11th and 12th grades, these students perform hands on construction work. The schools offer
electrical repair classes, small engine repair classes, marine repair classes, and child care services. In
order for students to take courses offered by Cape Fear Community College, the students must be
computer literate and have the necessary mathematical skills to get a decent job in the trades. The
old shop classes are not provided for students. The level of technology has gone beyond this point.
There were 40 students from Laney High School that attended Cape Fear Community College last
year. These students received community college credits and high school credits. The courses
offered by the School System allow students to obtain some skill in an area and transfer over to Cape
Fear Community College to become skilled in a particular area.
Dr. Eric McKeithan, President of Cape Fear Community College (CFCC), reported that
students must complete the 21 required units in high school before they can attend CFCC. The public
schools do not have a choice of placing students in courses offered by the College. Currently, there
are programs where students can take courses in high school that will be applied as credits at CFCC.
One such program is dual enrollment. The high school student must receive permission from the
Principal and Superintendent of Schools to enroll in courses offered by CFCC at a convenient time
for the student. No tuition is charged and transportation is provided from the school to the college.
This is an excellent program, and it is felt that if parents were aware of dual enrollment, more students
would be taking advantage of this opportunity.
Dr. McKeithan reported Huskinsville, a program recently enacted by federal legislation, is
similar to the dual enrollment program except under dual enrollment only one child can be considered
at a time. Under the Huskinsville legislation, an entire group of high school students can attend
courses offered by CFCC. These classes can be offered on the high school campuses or at the
College. With the demand for skilled workers, every high school needs vocational education
facilities. Schools could construct additional computer labs and other vocational facilities with CFCC
delivering those programs to the school campus under the Huskinsville program. This is a great
opportunity to provide vocational education courses to high school students and allow them to earn
credits at high school as well as at CFCC.
Discussion followed on the school dropout rate. Superintendent Morris reported the School
System is focusing on why students drop out of school. One problem identified is the fact that every
9th grade student is required to take biology, algebra, english, government economics, and house
physical education courses. With these five required courses, this leaves only one elective course.
Currently, the federal vocational education program requires each student to take two years of
vocational courses before they are allowed to perform hands on work. This discourages many
students and they drop out of school. Four years ago, algebra was not required to graduate. Now
algebra and the other four courses are required. In the past, the mathematics necessary for carpentry
or masonry were included in a technical manual and taught while taking a shop course. The entire
system has changed.
Further discussion followed on the number of students that actually drop out of school.
Superintendent Morris advised that 300 students drop out of school each year. The current
vocational education program will not help with this problem because the students do not have access
to the program until they become juniors in high school.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 39
JANUARY 25, 1999
Mr. Hayes reported that most of the school drop outs occur in the 9th grade; therefore, they
do not have access to vocational education at this time.
Chairman Higgins advised at the beginning of the school year, there were approximately 1,700
students in the 9th grade. As you review the figures, it appears that most of the students are dropping
out of school between the 9th, 10th, and 11th grades. With mandates from the state and federal
governments, there is very little that can be done by the local school system. However, if parents
become aware of the dual enrollment and Huskinsville programs, some of these students can be
reached.
Superintendent Morris advised that middle school teachers will be required to attend a training
program called CAPS. This program will require every middle school student and parent to meet
with the teacher to develop a plan for the courses to be taken by that student. Hopefully, this will
provide guidance for the student and parents. Also, there is new legislation that will require schools
to stop promoting students that cannot pass proficiency tests. The New Hanover County School
System started this program last year. Any student that did not pass the 8th grade proficiency test
was not allowed to enter the regular high school curriculum when entering the 9th grade. Those
students were placed in remedial courses in math and reading in the high schools until they could pass
the competency tests.
Mr. Bilzi said that many students drop out because of the manner in which courses are
administered. In the past, students in the 8th and 9th grades could take vocational education courses.
With the current 21 unit requirement, the students no longer have time for vocational education.
Commissioner Howell recommended lobbying the legislators for a change in the State law
if the requirements are hindering students from selecting vocational courses in the eighth and ninth
grades, which frequently causes students to drop out of school.
Superintendent Morris stated that when the State Board of Education finalizes the promotion
standards in March and presents them to the superintendents, they will probably ask the State Board
for differentiated instruction. The schools should not be held accountable for every student being
prepared to attend college. The State Board of Education should be requested to provide another
educational outlet for children who are not interested in attending college. In New Hanover County,
86% of graduating seniors attend four or two year colleges. Approximately 53% of the students
attend a university, 36% attend a two-year colleges, and 10% enter the military. There is a very small
percentage of students graduating from high school who go directly into the workforce.
Commissioner Birzenieks stated it appears that the Board of Education and Cape Fear
Community College are satisfied with the level of vocational education in New Hanover County;
therefore, the Board of County Commissioners does not have to worry about this type of education
or setting money aside for vocational education.
Superintendent Morris responded that New Hanover County does have excellent programs,
but more needs to be done in vocational education. He said as a member of an organization composed
of 12 superintendents of the largest schools in the State, this group is working with the State
Superintendent of Public Instruction to bring pressure on the State Legislature to allow for more
vocational courses to be offered to students who have no interest in algebra or biology.
Commissioner Birzenieks commented on the Lincoln County School of Technology and he
reported his daughter was a teacher in Lincoln County. When teachers are asked about the School
of Technology, they say they are more than satisfied with the success of the school; however, the only
problem is the fact that only 11th and 12th grade students can attend the school. The teachers feel
that vocational education courses should be offered in the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades to keep students
from dropping out of school.
Superintendent Morris agreed with Commissioner Birzenieks and stated this was the reason
why the State Legislature should be lobbied for a change in the law.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 40
JANUARY 25, 1999
Dr. McKeithan reported that CFCC was in the process of trying to determine how technical
vocational training can be provided to keep students in school. The School System is trying to focus
on the drop out rate. Each year CFCC enrolls approximately 400 students of recent high school drop
outs in the GED program so they can enroll in technical occupational programs. Approximately 900
students are now taking these courses.
Vice-Chairman Greer advised that in order to lobby the Legislature, the Board of Education
and Dr. Morris should keep the County Commissioners informed as well as other counties so the local
governments can support any legislative changes.
County Manager O’Neal recommended requesting the County Commissioners Association
and the School Association to jointly develop a policy to establish a goal for vocational education in
the State of North Carolina. This type of document would be beneficial in approaching the General
Assembly about amending the State regulations governing vocational education.
SCHEDULING OF QUARTERLY MEETINGS BETWEEN THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
After discussion of the meeting being informative to both boards, the Board of Education and
Board of County Commissioners decided to meet quarterly. The next meeting was scheduled for
April 27, 1999 with the time and place to be announced at a later date.
DISCUSSION OF NAMING THE SITE FOR THE COUNTY PARK AT PILOT’S RIDGE
Chairman Caster recommended allowing the Parks Advisory Board to name the park site in
Pilot’s Ridge.
Vice-Chairman Greer, the Board’s representative on the Parks Advisory Board, stated he
would be glad to present this request to the Parks Advisory Board. He also mentioned that prior
discussion had been held among the Commissioners about requesting the Board of Education to
appoint a representative from the schools to serve on the Parks Advisory Board.
After further discussion, Chairman Caster advised that he would write a letter to Chairman
Higgins requesting an appointment of a school representative after final action has been taken by the
Board of County Commissioners.
DISCUSSION OF LEGION STADIUM
Chairman Caster reported that he contacted Mayor Hicks about scheduling another meeting
of the Legion Stadium Commission. Once a date has been selected, everyone will be informed.
Chairman Caster advised that if an agreement cannot be reached about the transfer of Legion
Stadium to the County, both Boards need to discuss another alternative.
DISCUSSION OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON AND THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL
SYSTEM
Superintendent Morris advised that an excellent line of communication had been developed
with the University of North Carolina at Wilmington. Currently, the School System is working with
UNCW on teacher evaluations.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Caster, on behalf of the Board, expressed appreciation to the Board of Education
for attending the meeting. He stated the meeting has been most informative and helpful to him. He
urged both Boards to continue to keep dialogue open on issues of concern.
Chairman Higgins and the other members of the Board of Education commented on this being
an informative meeting and stated they looked forward to opening the lines of communication and
developing a better relationship with the Board of County Commissioners
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 27
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING WITH BOARD OF EDUCATIONPAGE 41
JANUARY 25, 1999
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Howell to adjourn.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Motion:
Vice-Chairman Hayes MOVED, SECONDED by Ms. Keck to adjourn. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Caster and Chairman Higgins adjourned their respective boards at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lucie F. Harrell
Clerk to the Board