1998-10-05 Regular Meeting
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 719
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met in Regular Session on Monday,
October 5, 1998, at 6:30 p.m. in the Assembly Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24
North Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioners Buzz Birzenieks; Ted Davis, Jr.; Charles R. Howell;
Chairman William A. Caster; County Manager, Allen O’Neal; County Attorney, Wanda M. Copley;
and Deputy Clerk to the Board, Teresa P. Elmore.
Vice-Chairman Robert G. Greer was absent.
Chairman Caster called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone present.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Deputy County Manager, Andrew J. Atkinson, gave the invocation.
Commissioner Howell led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Chairman Caster announced that time had been reserved to allow the public to present an item
that was not listed on the regular agenda or comment on an item listed on the Consent Agenda. He
requested all persons speaking to limit their remarks to three minutes.
Chairman Caster welcomed Dr. Tom Barth, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, and
his Public Administration Class in attendance at the meeting.
Chairman Caster announced that Vice-Chairman Greer was visiting the country of Germany
along with other members of the National Association of Counties. They had an opportunity to work
with local governments in Germany.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Howell, to approve
the Consent Agenda Items. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 to 0.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Minutes
The Commissioners approved the following sets of minutes as presented by the Clerk to the
Board:
Land Trust Work Session, September 3, 1998
Regular Meeting, September 8, 1998
Hospital Work Session, September 17, 1998
Regular Meeting, September 21, 1998
Closed Session, September 21, 1998
Ratification of Resolution to Allow Contractors to Enter Private Property and Roadways
within New Hanover County for the Purpose of Removing Vegetative Debris Caused By
Hurricane Bonnie
The Commissioners ratified the Emergency Proclamation that was adopted by telephone poll
on September 8, 1998. Verbal approval was granted to adopt the resolution that allows contractors
to enter private property and roadways for the purpose of removing vegetative debris caused by
Hurricane Bonnie.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in
Exhibit Book XXIV, Page 31.
Adoption of Drug and Alcohol Policy for the Public Transportation Services
The Commissioners adopted an update to the County’s drug and alcohol policy for its
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 720
public transportation service (New Hanover Transportation Services). To continue receiving funding
from the Federal Transit Administration, the County must comply with revised Section 5311
regulations. The private operator with whom the County contracts to provide transportation services
to County residents will insure the policy is adhered to at its own expense.
Award of Bid #99-0096 (Contract #99-0096) to Bob King Pontiac GMC, Inc. to Purchase
Three (3) Full-Size Four-Door Vehicles for the Sheriff’s Department
The Commissioners adopted a resolution awarding Bid 99-096 to Bob King Pontiac GMC,
Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, to purchase three (3) full-size, four-door vehicles. Funding for
the purchase of the vehicles will be provided from federal seizure funds.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as part of the minutes and is contained in
Exhibit Book XXIV, Page 31.
Acceptance of North Carolina Division of Forest Resources Urban and Community Forest
Grant Awarded to the New Hanover County Urban Forestry Education Program and
Approval of Budget Amendment 99-0029
The Commissioners accepted a grant award from the North Carolina Division of Forest
Resources Urban and Community Forestry, in the amount of $4,884.00, for the Urban Forestry
Education Program. The Cooperative Extension Service will conduct an educational campaign to
raise the awareness and to promote proper maintenance of the urban forest. Budget Amendment 99-
0029 was approved to budget the grant award.
Budget Amendment 99-0029 - Cooperative Extension Service
Debit Credit
Urban Forestry Grant$4,884
Cooperative Extension Expenses$4,884
Purpose: To budget the grant awarded for the Urban Forestry Education Program.
Approval of Amendment to BMS Contract on the Space Study Update of the County
Administration Buildings
The Commissioners approved an amendment to the contract with BMS Architects for
additional services regarding the Space Study Update. The amendment will increase the contract
price to a maximum of $24,500 to include expanding the scope of work in the evaluation of other
sites. Budget Amendment 99-0032 was approved to increase the budget for expanded scope of
work.
Budget Amendment 99-0032 - Contingencies/Non Departmental
Debit Credit
Contingencies
Contingency$9,500
Non-Departmental
Contracted Services$9,500
Purpose: To increase budget for the amended contract to BMS Architects
Approval of Funding Match For Multi-modal Transportation Facility Study
The Commissioners approved funding, in the amount of $2,694, as a required local match for
the Multi-modal Transportation Facility Study, as requested by the Wilmington Urban Area
Transportation Advisory Committee. The study’s scope of work will examine the need for a transit
transfer center as a means of enhancing transit ridership and operations efficiency, as well as
investigate the following issues: passenger rail service, downtown transit facilities, pedestrian
connections, tourism, the coordination and location of parking facilities and requirements. Eighty
percent of the total cost of $59,800 will be funded by the State. Budget
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 721
Amendment 99-0033 was approved to budget the County’s share.
Budget Amendment 99-0033 - Contingencies/Outside Agencies - Economic and Physical
Debit Credit
Contingencies
Contingency$2,694
Outside Agencies/Economic & Physical
City of Wilmington $2,694
Purpose: To increase budget for the County’s share of the cost for a Multi-modal transportation
facility study.
Approval of an Installment Purchase Contract (#99-0122) with Heller Public Finance, LLC for
Financing of Equipment and Approval of Associated Budget Amendment #99-0034
The Commissioners adopted a resolution authorizing the approval of Contract 99-0122 with
Heller Public Finance for financing the purchase of equipment (800 MHZ radios for the Sheriff’s
Department, bulldozer for the Landfill, and dump trucks for Environmental Management). Budget
Amendment 99-0034 was approved to budget funds for repayment of this year’s portion of the loan.
Budget Amendment 99-0034 - Various Departments
Debit Credit
General Fund:
Sheriff’s Department/Administration:
Installment Loan Proceeds$920,000
Departmental Supplies $93,300
Capital Outlay - Equipment$826,700
Environmental Fund:
Landfill Operations:
Installment Loan Proceeds$380,000
Capital Outlay - Equipment$300,000
WASTEC/Operations:
Motor Vehicles $80,000
Purpose: To budget installment loan proceeds for financing 800 MHZ radio equipment for
the Sheriff’s Department, 2 dump trucks for the WASTEC Operations, and a bulldozer for
the Landfill. The items were approved in the current budget to be purchased through
installment financing. The budget amendment is for accounting purposes only.
Acceptance of 1998-99 HUD Cooperative Agreement Continuation Grant for the Human
Relations Commission
The Commissioners approved the HUD Cooperative Agreement for the Fair Housing
Assistance Program, in the amount of $25,200, for the Human Relations Commission. Budget
Amendment 99-0036 was approved to adjust the budget in the amount received, $25,200, and to
rollover $850 from FY1997-98. $27,000 was budgeted.
Budget Amendment 99-0036 - Human Relations/HUD Grant
DebitCredit
HUD Grant$950
Human Relations - Contract Services$950
Purpose: To adjust budget to the amount of FY 1998-99 HUD award ($25,200) and
FY1997-98 rollover amount.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 722
Approval of Budget Amendment #99-0031 for the County Library
The Commissioners approved the following budget amendment:
Budget Amendment 99-00313 - County Library
Debit Credit
Partnership for Children Grant$23,100
Salaries$14,400
FICA $1,150
Supplies $1,100
Travel $850
Telephone $72
Printing $300
Books $5,228
Purpose: To budget the first quarter allocation of grant funds for the Library’s Partnership
for Children grant
Approval of Budget Amendment #99-0035 - Finance Department
The Commissioners approved the following budget amendment:
Budget Amendment 99-0035 - Finance Department
Debit Credit
Hurricane Bonnie
FEMA - Federal$3,500,000
Salaries $400,000
Contract Services $3,100,000
Purpose: To increase budget for anticipated expenditures/revenues related to Hurricane
Bonnie
Approval of Budget Amendment #99-11 - Engineering/Planning
The Commissioners approved the following budget amendment:
Budget Amendment 99-11 - Engineering/Planning
Debit Credit
Kirkland Capital Project
Transfer in from Fund 800 $46,000
Capital Project Expense$46,000
Sewer District
Appropriate Fund Balance$46,000
Transfer to Sewer Capital Project$46,000
Purpose: To increase budget in Fund 835 (Kirkland Capital Project) for revenue transferred
from Sewer District (Fund 800). The funds are necessary to complete the project.
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO EMT PARAMEDIC LARRY GURGANIOUS
Chairman Caster, on behalf of the Board, presented a plaque to Larry Gurganious, an EMT
paramedic with New Hanover Regional EMS, in recognition of his quick response and ingenious
thinking that saved the life of Brandon Laws. Paramedic Gurganious removed a cherry tomato that
was blocking the airway of the four-year-old child. Mr. Gurganious was an employee of the County’s
EMS Department when the event occurred.
Chairman Caster introduced Mr. Gurganious’s wife and daughter; Dr. William K. Atkinson,
President and CEO of New Hanover Regional Medical Center; Mr. J. E. Woodard, Jr., Chief,
Emergency Medical Services; and Mr. David Nobles, Assistant Chief, Emergency
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 723
Medical Service, as those in attendance with Mr. Gurganious.
PRESENTATION BY U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON PROPOSAL TO
INCORPORATE WETLAND CONSIDERATIONS INTO THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS
Mr. Ernest Jahnke, Manager of the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office of the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers, spoke regarding the Corps’ proposal to incorporate wetland consideration into
the County’s subdivision review process. He requested the County to require wetland delineation
on preliminary development plans when the plans are submitted to the County Planning Department
for approval.
In February 1997, the Board had postponed voting on the request because of the need to
study wetland delineations in more detail. Dr. Courtney Hackney, of the University of North Carolina
at Wilmington, conducted a workshop on wetland delineations and discussed his experiences as a
consultant working with environmental and development issues in Florida. Since then Dr. Mallin, of
the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, presented findings of a four-year tidal creek study
to the Board. The data showed a strong relationship between development in low-lying areas and
water quality problems near the creeks.
Mr. Jahnke explained the Corps believes many water quality, drainage, and flooding problems
in New Hanover County are caused by the destruction of wetlands. The natural function of wetlands
is to perform as water storage areas and pollutant filters. Sediments, toxins and other pollutants are
filtered in wetlands by the retention and slow release of surface water and plant intake. Natural
wetland areas reduce downstream flooding in the watershed as the wetland holds and absorbs surface
water and allows slow release during periods of high precipitation.
The County can address the use of wetland in the planning process by requiring a wetland
survey. Developers will know which areas to avoid or if they should apply for federal or state
permits. The Planning Department will use the surveys to make density determinations. There will
be no expense to the taxpayer or to the County. The Corps would like for the County to participate
as a partner in the process to reduce the accumulative loss of wetlands. Because of the explosive
commercial and residential development that has occurred during the past decade, flooding and
drainage problems have increased. As impervious surfaces increase and wetlands decrease, flooding
problems will become worse.
Mr. Jahnke stated more consideration should be given to wetland and its natural function in
the planning process in order to address the flooding and drainage problems in the county. As the
Star News reported on July 28, 1998, taxpayers have paid $80,000 for the Pages Creek Drainage
Study. The study determined the costs of protecting the watershed as: $287,000 for culvert
replacement, $4.6 million to clear streams, $32.4 million to mitigate estuarine damage to water
quality, and $16 million to purchase protective property along the water front.
Recently, the City of Wilmington notified property owners of a monthly stormwater fee, based
on the amount of impervious surfaces on the property. The City was responding to its responsibility
of protecting public health, preventing erosion, and safeguarding the environment. Expanding
stormwater services are needed to adequately protect life, property, and water quality. By
considering the function of wetlands early in the planning process, future tax increases and
expenditures for costly stormwater infrastructure and maintenance will be reduced. A wetland
delineation is certified as accurate for five years, thereby allowing site planning over a long term.
Mr. Jahnke assured the Commissioners that the development community will receive timely
responses from the Corps for verification and certification of the survey delineations. The
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has promised to respond within two weeks of a request to
perform a survey. Jeff Richter, Regulatory Specialist in New Hanover County, will perform the
surveys and Scott McLendon will provide assistance.
If wetland impacts are unavoidable, the developer can submit an early application for a
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 724
permit and will not be delayed. A wetland survey facilitates permit review by many state and local
regulatory agencies concerned with water quality, stormwater plans and other related issues. The
Corps urges the Commissioners to adopt the regulations.
Commissioner Davis asked why the Corps stops construction on a project when wetlands
have been found on the property.
Mr. Jahnke responded the Corps can stop a project when the wetlands are discovered until
a permit is received, because it is a violation of federal law to build on wetlands. If the wetland areas
are identified before construction begins during the preliminary plan stage, future delays can be
avoided. The Corps determines if the property is useable or if the plan needs to be redesigned to
reduce the impact to those areas.
Commissioner Davis requested Mr. Jahnke to define the growing season of wetlands and he
asked if the developer can appeal the Corps’ decision.
Mr. Jahnke responded if the Corps denies a permit, it then becomes a legal matter or a
“takings” issue. The Corps is developing an appeals process so the courts will not need to hear the
appeal. Wetlands are defined by three perimeters: vegetation, soils and hydrology. The growing
season refers to the hydrologic aspect of the land that is saturated or near the surface for at least 5%
to 12% of the growing season. The Corps uses the County soil survey, which gives the beginning
and ending dates of the growing season for New Hanover County, based on the 28-degree
temperature.
Commissioner Davis questioned whether the Corps can guarantee a developer that a
delineation can be done in two weeks since the Corps is understaffed.
Mr. Jahnke responded the Corps felt the situation in New Hanover County needs to be
addressed immediately. Mr. Richter, who works in the Coastal Area Management process, has
agreed to accommodate the development community.
Chairman Caster stated that when the Corps first presented the proposal in February 1997,
many people were confused and felt the Corps wanted the County to perform the surveys. He noted
the County has been involved in developing a Comprehensive Plan, which discusses the need to
protect wetland areas.
Commissioner Birzenieks asked who will pay for the wetland surveys if the taxpayers are not
going to pay.
Mr. Jahnke explained the developers will pay for the delineation and certification process.
Commissioners Birzenieks commented that ultimately the homeowner will bear any expense
of the developer. Although everyone wants to protect the wetland areas, New Hanover County is
becoming a very expensive place to live. The cost of the surveys ultimately will be passed on to the
homeowners.
Mr. Jahnke replied when development occurs in the wrong area, the taxpayer or the
homeowner again bears the expense of correcting the problem.
Chairman Caster opened the discussion to a couple of individuals in the audience saying a
longer public debate will be allowed in the near future.
Mr. Bill Grathwol, a developer, spoke concerning the problem of delaying the preliminary plan
process. He suggested a wetland survey could be performed prior to the recording of a final plat.
Sometimes when property is purchased with the intent of developing, a wetland survey is performed.
If there is a large amount of wetlands on the property, the developer may decide not to purchase.
However, a developer will purchase a controllable amount of wetlands and proceed in developing a
preliminary plan. When property is under option to purchase and the Planning Department does not
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 725
approve the preliminary plan, negotiations are ended. If the plan is approved and the wetland areas
are minimal, negotiations between the buyer and seller will continue. Mr. Grathwol felt developers
will support wetland surveys being performed after the approval of preliminary plans because they
do not want to violate wetland areas.
In clarifying the definition of growing season, Mr. Grathwol explained that 5% of the 240 day
growing season is about 14 days. If the soil is saturated for 14 continuous days and the rainfall is
normal, the property is classified as wetland. It does not matter that the property is on a hill or if the
hardpan is beneath the sandy soil. A large percentage of the remaining undeveloped land in the
County will probably be classified as wetland. The Commissioners have addressed stormwater runoff
in subdivisions by requiring pre- and post-runoff to be constant. Additionally, another ordinance
requires stormwater management in subdivisions to retain the first inch of water in ponds.
Mr. William J. Hart, President of Council of Neighborhood Associations, endorsed the
proposal to amend the Zoning, Subdivision, and Conservation Overlay District Ordinances to require
delineation of federal jurisdictional wetlands on all plats and other plans submitted for permits to build
within the county. He reminded the Board of Professor Malcolm’s recommendation to identify and
install a management system for the backbone stream system in which wetlands are a significant part.
He further requested the Board to allow experts to develop criteria for use in defining those
areas of long-term economic and ecologic values to require delineation and management of wetlands
in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens in New Hanover County. As Mr.
Grathwol pointed out, a very large percentage of the remaining undeveloped land is hydric in
character and drains poorly. Part of the comprehensive plan process is to consider special treatment
of areas with hydric soil. While maintaining the objective of high water quality, the property should
be analyzed to see how the property can be used.
Mr. Hart showed an overhead slide that illustrated how the City of Wilmington addressed a
proposed subdivision with wetlands as delineated by a consulting engineering firm for the developer.
In the initial plat, a parking lot was proposed in the middle of a 404 wetland area. The City’s staff
worked with the developer in arranging the plat by moving the parking area away from the wetland.
No retention pond was needed and the cost to the developer was significantly less in constructing the
same number of units. Wetland areas have an aesthetic value and serve as surface water flow
retention facilities. He urged the Commissioners to adopt ordinances to delineate wetland on
subdivision plats.
Chairman Caster asked Mr. Grathwol when a developer hires a consultant to delineate the
wetland.
Mr. Grathwol responded that he hires a consultant to flag wetland areas after he purchases
the property. If significant wetlands are noted, he considers draining the area before the Corps is
asked to give a final wetland recommendation. A rim ditch is dug to de-water the wet areas.
Sometimes a property can be used after installing permanent drainage. A soil scientist or botanist can
determine the kind of soil and its draining characteristics.
Chairman Caster stated the County will need to conduct a work session with the Corps and
those whom the regulations affect. The draft Comprehensive Plan addresses the protection of coastal
and federally regulated wetlands through early identification of wetlands in the development process
and review of the development plans to avoid or minimize impacts.
After discussion on the need to more thoroughly explore the issues involved, the
Commissioners agreed to conduct a work session with the Corps and development community.
Chairman Caster, on behalf of the Board, expressed appreciation for the comments made on
the Corps’ proposal.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 726
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH NEW
HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Chairman Caster reported on the need to amend the lease agreement with New Hanover
Regional Medical Center by extending the lease beyond five years. The bond counsel felt that the
term of the lease should be the length of the bond. Mrs. Rountree, Chairman of the Trustees, had
suggested to extend the lease agreement to 99 years.
County Attorney Wanda Copley stated traditionally lease documents are extended through
the life of the debt. Discussion occurred on the 90 day termination provision in the lease which
allows the County to give the hospital a 90 day notice if the lease is to be terminated. The procedure
calls for a public hearing to be held on terminating the lease. Concern has been expressed by some
of the trustees that the clause should be deleted and the lease should be for either a 99 year or 30 year
term. Bond counsels have discussed the termination clause at previous meetings and it has never
prevented a financing of a bond from occurring.
Mrs. Rountree, Chairman of the Board of Trustees, spoke of the Trustees’ concern that the
clause takes away the importance of an extended term. She respectfully requested the Board to
approve the term of lease and to delete Section 03.03 concerning the 90-day termination provision.
Commissioner Birzenieks commented that the term of the lease should be amended because
the lease is connected to financing and debt service requirements; however, the 90-day termination
clause is not a financial issue and does not affect the bond rating.
Mrs. Rountree replied that the clause, as pointed out by the Hospital’s attorney, Dumay
Gorham, seems to be a contradiction. Although the lease may be for 30 years, the clause allows the
lease to be terminated in 90 days without cause. The bond counsel has mentioned that they would
rather have the clause removed; nevertheless, they have not refused any loans because of it.
Commissioner Birzenieks replied the clause is an issue of control by the Board of
Commissioners.
Mrs. Rountree spoke of the trust between the Commissioners and the Board of Trustees. She
felt that the clause will never be used; therefore, it is not needed. As a matter of good faith, she
requested the Board to remove the termination clause from the agreement.
Commissioner Davis commented on the trust of the Commissioners in the Board of Trustees.
If the Commissioners did not trust the trustees, they would not have appointed the individuals serving
as members.
Chairman Caster commented on the strong feelings of the community about the hospital. The
Board must answer to the citizens of New Hanover County, who desire the Commissioners as elected
officials to have some control or influence over the hospital. He agreed to changing the length of the
term.
Commissioner Birzenieks spoke of the Commissioners’ need to have adequate time to study
the issues that come before the Board in order to make the best decision. Mr. Gorham and Ms.
Copley faxed copies of the lease earlier in the day and he did not have sufficient time to study and
understand the thirty page lease agreement. He suggested the entire Board may need to discuss the
issue at a later time.
Chairman Caster asked if the length of the lease needed to be addressed at this time.
Attorney Copley responded that in discussions with bond counsel concerning the financing,
a revised lease will be needed by the end of October. A TEPRA hearing and other criteria will need
to be scheduled before the bonds can be sold.
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, to extend the hospital lease to 30 years and to
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 727
postpone consideration of the 90-day termination clause.
Substitute Motion:
Commissioner Davis MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Howell, to
extend the term of the lease to 30 years and to deny the request to delete the 90-day termination
clause in the lease agreement. Upon vote, the MOTION RECEIVED A TIED VOTE AS
FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye:Commissioner Davis
Commissioner Howell
Voting No:Commissioner Birzenieks
Chairman Caster
Absent:Vice Chairman Greer
County Attorney Copley advised that the 90-day termination provision will make a 30-year
lease ineffectual if the lease can be unilaterally terminated.
Original Motion:
Chairman Caster SECONDED the original motion made by Commissioner
Birzenieks to extend the hospital lease to 30 years and to postpone consideration of the termination
clause. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
WILLIAM MAYO IN ORDER TO EXPAND HIGHLAND PINES MOBILE HOME PARK,
AT 6324 AND 6326 GORDON ROAD, BY ADDING 18 NEW SPACES. (S-434, 9/98)
Chairman Caster opened the Public Hearing and announced that the special use process
requires a quasi-judicial hearing; therefore, any persons wishing to testify must be sworn in by the
Deputy Clerk to the Board.
The following persons were sworn in:
Dexter Hayes, Planning Director
William Mayo, Petitioner
Planning Director Dexter Hayes reported that Highland Pines Mobile Home Park is an
existing facility consisting of 43 spaces. The current owner purchased the mobile home park in 1982.
At the time it consisted of 17 spaces. Nineteen additional spaces were approved later that same year.
In 1984, authorization was granted to expand the park by 7 spaces. The Planning Board voted
unanimously to recommend approval subject to Staff’s recommendation to provide a road connection
between the main park and lots 1-12, and the placement of a turn-around at lots 15e and 15f to
accommodate emergency vehicles. The Board believed the expansion was consistent with the
existing land use pattern and would not impact property values in the vicinity. There was no public
comment at the Planning Board meeting except for the applicant. The petitioner has incorporated
the Planning Board’s concerns about circulation and interconnections into the revised site plan.
Planning Director Hayes presented the following preliminary staff findings:
1.The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if
located where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved.
A.The site will be served by an on-site private water system and county sewer.
B.The site has direct access to Gordon Road
C.The site is located in the Ogden VFD District.
D.None of the spaces is located in the regulatory flood plain.
2.The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the
Zoning Ordinance.
A.A site plan pursuant to local requirements has been submitted.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 728
B.The site is zoned R-15. Mobile home parks are permitted by special use permit in this
district.
C.None of the spaces is located in the 100 year flood plain.
D.The spaces are also located beyond the boundaries of the swamp forest resource that
runs parallel to the creek along the tract’s western border. Applicable setbacks can
easily be met.
3.The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting
property or that the use is a public necessity.
A.The area planned for expansion is within the boundaries of the parent parcel that now
contains the existing mobile home park.
4.The Board must find that the location and character of the use, if developed according to the
plan as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located
and in general conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover County.
A.The development pattern of the area consists of mobile homes, double-wides, single
family dwellings, and a church.
B.Mission Hills, a double-wide subdivision, borders the mobile home park to the east.
C.Land along the site’s west side is heavily wooded. The border is formed by a small
creek that is part of the Smith Creek watershed. The County maintains a sewer line
and easement along the creek.
Chairman Caster asked Mr. Mayo if he agreed with the staff findings as presented and if he
would comply to the requirements.
Mr. Mayo concurred with the findings as presented and agreed to the requirements.
There being no further comments, Chairman Caster closed the Public Hearing.
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to grant the
Special Use Permit to William Mayo to expand Highland Mobile Home Park by adding 18 new spaces
based upon the findings of facts and evidence presented, concluding that the use will not materially
endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and developed according to the plan
as submitted and approved; the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Zoning
Ordinance; the use will not substantially injure the value of the adjoining or abutting property or that
the use is a public necessity; and the location and character of the use, if developed according to the
plan as submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in
general conformity with the plan of development for New Hanover County. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
A copy of the Special Use Permit is hereby incorporated as a part of the minutes and is
contained in SUP Book II, Page 24.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST BY ERNEST PUSKAS TO AMEND THE
ZONING ORDINANCE BY ELIMINATING ATTACHED HOUSING AS A PERMITTED
USE IN THE RA RURAL AGRICULTURE DISTRICT (A-291, 9/98)
Chairman Caster opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Dexter Hayes reported that the text amendment was submitted by Ernest
Puskas, a property owner living in the Castle Hayne neighborhood. The Rural Agriculture District
classification does correspond with the Castle Hayne area, which was the last area of the County to
be zoned for that classification in July 1985.
The Planning Board voted 5 to 1 to recommend denial of the petition as submitted. The
majority felt the elimination of performance development and attached housing opportunities, even
in the Rural Agriculture District, would deprive the County of useful development tools, especially
for sites with sensitive environmental areas that could be conserved. They also felt
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 729
it would be generally inconsistent with the Land Use Plan’s residential policies that promote a wide
variety of housing opportunities. They also seemed to agree that density limitations in the RA District
were sufficiently low to preserve the area’s generally rural character.
One property owner did speak in opposition at the Planning Board meeting saying that the
elimination of attached housing, such as duplexes, was unnecessary because of the minimum lot size
requirement of 50,000 square feet for duplexes. However, the petitioner argued that the definition
of the RA District which promoted single family uses, farming, and rural lifestyles was contradicted
by allowing attached housing in the area.
Proposed Revisions by Applicant (noted in boldface italics)
59.5-1 Rural Agriculture District (7/1/85)
The RA Rural Agriculture District is established as a district in which the principal use of the
land is for low density single family residential purposes. The regulations of this district
permitting
encourage rural farming activities, the preservation of open space and
development compatible with the preservation of its rural character and providing limited
growth.
The district is designed to promote exurban, low density residential development not
Duplexes,
requiring urban services while maintaining prime farm land and a rural lifestyle.
residential clusters, attached residential, and high density attached residential uses shall
not be permitted.
Mr. Ernest Puskas, a resident of 501 Prince George Avenue, stated he had lived in the Castle
Hayne area for sixty years and had enjoyed the rural lifestyle of the community. He expressed the
desire of the community to retain its RA District, which is the last area of the county that is zoned
as an RA District. He spoke of his service to the County as a past member of the Planning Board and
the Growth and Development Study Committee. Currently, he serves on the Comprehensive Plan
Steering Committee with Chairman Caster and Commissioner Birzenieks. Although there are many
attractive housing developments in the county, the residents of Castle Hayne would like to remain
single family dwellings and not allow townhouses and apartments. The description of the RA District
is designed to promote exurban, low-density residential uses that do not require urban services;
however, the Table of Permitted Uses is contradictory to the description. The R-20S District does
not allow mobile homes (which is not included in this petition), duplexes, residential clusters, attached
residential, and high density attached residential uses. He requested the Board to preserve the Castle
Hayne area in a similar fashion and to maintain its prime farm land and rural lifestyle.
Mr. Tom Radewicz, a resident of 3725 Marathon Avenue, spoke in support of the proposed
text amendment. As Castle Hayne is the only open area in the County, developers will want to build
as soon as the area has water and sewer services. He urged the Commissioners to protect the
community through the County’s Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan and approve the
proposed text amendment.
Mr. Buddy Allard, a resident of 202 Eggert Avenue in Castle Hayne, spoke of the need to
protect the rural neighborhood. Although raised in the Bayshore Estates area of New Hanover
County, he moved to the Castle Hayne area in 1992 to raise his children in the serene environment.
He asked the Commissioners to preserve and protect the rural lifestyle through the zoning
regulations. In recent years, people moving into the area continue to purchase and build homes on
large tracts of land that is consistent with the area. Although the community realizes that they cannot
stop growth and progress, he felt the area should be protected because of its uniqueness in the
county.
Mr. Craig Braak, a resident of 515 Prince George Avenue, spoke of being a third generation
owner of a farm that has been in existence since the 1920s. Many of the properties remain in the
same families and the owners are unwilling to relinquish the property to a different type of
development. He urged the Commissioners to approve the proposed text amendment to keep the
rural agricultural atmosphere of the Castle Hayne area.
Commissioner Davis asked Mr. Puskas if staff’s recommended language of the text
amendment was acceptable to him.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 730
Director Hayes explained that the primary difference in the wording of the two proposals was
that staff did not include a prohibition against duplexes. Duplexes require 50,000 square foot lots
under the Special Use Process. Individual lot sizes are 30,000 square feet.
Mr. Puskas responded that he felt no duplexes should be allowed in the rural area. He
requested the Commissioners to allow staff to work with the people of Castle Hayne to write the
specific language needed to protect the area if the Board did not agree with the proposed text. Some
of the boundaries in the Rural Agriculture District may need changing to R-20. He spoke of his
concern that none of the Planning Board members live in the Castle Hayne area or were familiar with
the area that they were discussing. The people who owned the land were present at the meeting. At
some point, government of the people, by the people, and for the people should be regarded.
Chairman Caster asked Planning Director Hayes if there would be a problem using the
verbiage proposed by Mr. Puskas that “duplexes, residential clusters, attached residential, and high
density attached residential uses shall not be permitted.”
Director Hayes responded that those types of housing choices are more affordable and the
only housing alternatives for some individuals. If a 30,000 square foot lot is required for each house,
the cost of housing may be prohibitive to some individuals. Duplexes and mobile homes are permitted
with a Special Use Permit. Originally, the area was zoned for large lot sizes and most are 10-acre
tracts that have been retained in the original mini-farm configurations. The 30,000 square foot lot
size was a compromise for the area. Another concern is in the environmental process of setting aside
open space as a part of the performance residential requirements. The County’s regulations allow
the acreage near a creek to be counted while the units are clustered outside of the area being
preserved. The overall density is the same, but the houses are clustered based on the total acreage.
The proposed regulation does not allow residential clusters.
Chairman Caster commented that the community is a very unique area of New Hanover
County and he felt that protection was needed.
Director Hayes pointed out that administrative changes were needed in the Table of Permitted
Uses by deleting the sections to be consistent with the amendment.
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks agreed that it was important to preserve the area’s heritage;
therefore he MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Howell, to approve the text amendment as
submitted by Mr. Puskas and to include the administrative changes to the Table of Permitted Uses.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
A copy of the ordinance is hereby incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in
Exhibit Book XXIV, Page 31.
AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE DRAFT WILMINGTON - NEW HANOVER
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE/CAMA PLAN UPDATE TO THE DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
Mr. John Jefferies, Chairman of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, reported that
the final draft of the City-County Comprehensive Plan is ready for submission to the State for review
and comment. Suggestions have been received from many diverse groups who have an interest in the
comprehensive plan. Input has been received from citizens, elected officials, and interest groups. A
public forum was televised for the community. The Steering Committee has worked diligently to get
the language in the plan that all citizens can accept. Work will continue by including input from the
Commissioners, Coastal Resources Commission, and citizens. The Steering Committee is committed
to remaining active in the process until the plan is formally adopted. He requested the
Commissioners to release the document to the State for its review and comment. After the State
review process, the draft Comprehensive/CAMA Plan Update will be returned to the Steering
Committee, Board of Commissioners, and City Council for public hearing consideration in the Spring
of 1999.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 731
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to authorize
the submittal of the Draft Comprehensive Plan to the Division of Coastal Management for review and
comment. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING
COMMITTEE FOR THE COUNTY TO FUND THE HIRING OF A CONSULTING FIRM
TO CONDUCT A LAND USE DESIGN CHARETTE
Planning Director Hayes reported that a land use design charette will give the Comprehensive
Plan Steering Committee guidelines in developing the Unified Development Ordinance. Some of the
scenarios may not be applicable to the City and County Zoning and Subdivision regulations, which
the Committee will need to incorporate.
Mr. Glenn Richardson, a member of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee and the
Chairman of the Wilmington Planning Commission, spoke on the need to address concerns as in the
planning item for the Castle Hayne text amendment and the Pages Creek Watershed Study. The
design charette can be a tool to have the community involved in establishing the goals of an area and
to formulate implementable ordinances. As an example, the process will consider how to maintain
the rural quality of the Castle Hayne area.
Commissioner Birzenieks spoke in support of the process, but felt that local consultants
should be used instead of hiring consultants who do not pay North Carolina or New Hanover County
taxes. He asked if there were consultants in the architectural community or experts at UNCW who
could be hired for the project.
Mr. Richardson responded on how hiring local firms may raise the criticism of self interest or
representing certain special interests. Hiring a consultant from out of the area will bring a neutral
party into the process who will be more objective instead of having a certain point of view. Secondly,
he noted the area does not have a firm that specializes in drafting design documents that can relate
to ordinances. Although several urban designers or land use firms are in Southeastern United States,
only one firm is found in North Carolina. The proposal from the Charlotte firm was four to five times
more expensive than the recommended firm.
Mr. Richardson advised that the two or three day process will include discussions of several
areas of the County, such as the Military Cutoff Road area. Through these discussions, a design plan
or a sketch is drawn to show how an area can be developed. The second process includes issues,
such as water quality, and can include educational seminars where scientific research can be presented
on the causes of water quality degradation. Discussions will center around developing ordinances
that will be accepted by the land owners, environmentalists, and others. It will be a public event that
will include elected officials and representatives from the Community Growth Task Force,
Wilmington Planning Commissions and County Planning Board.
Chairman Caster reported that the Steering Committee had mixed feelings on the proposal
initially, but after Friday’s meeting everyone agreed on the importance of conducting the charette.
Furthermore, Chairman Caster recommended that the County pay the full $35,000 instead of sharing
the cost with the City. In discussions with the City on consolidating departments, the County had
agreed to more equitably fund joint projects by paying two-thirds of the cost. However, in good
faith, he had offered to pay the total amount of $35,000.
Motion:
Chairman Caster MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Birzenieks, to approve the
funding in the amount of $35,000 to hire a consultant to perform a land use design charette as
recommended by the Wilmington-New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
DISCUSSION ON BOND REFERENDUM FOR ACQUISITION OF GREENSPACE
Chairman Caster reported that after several discussions about purchasing Airlie Gardens and
the Greenview Ranches area, the Board felt the County needs to preserve more greenspace for future
parks, school sites, and natural areas. The question was asked if the citizens of the County would
support a bond referendum for the issuance of $50 million general obligation
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 732
bonds to purchase greenspace.
Commissioner Birzenieks expressed support for the bond referendum and suggested to move
forward in establishing a time line. He asked how soon the County could have the referendum before
the voters.
County Manager O’Neal responded that there will be two elections in 1999: October 5, 1999
for a City election and November 2, 1999 for a possible City runoff election and the standard election
for the beach communities. However, the Commissioners can call for a special election as long as
publication of notice is given 30 to 45 days prior to the election.
County Attorney Copley advised that bond counsel will need to be notified immediately to
draft the language for the ballot.
Commissioner Birzenieks asked how much a special election will cost the taxpayers. He felt
an ad hoc committee should conduct a study to show the support of a referendum.
Commissioner Davis asked why the County would have a bond referendum to purchase green
space and park land, but not have a bond referendum on the purchase of Airlie.
County Attorney Copley responded that the bond referendum is required because the County
will need to pledge full faith and credit as the taxing authority that it will pay for the purchase of a
large amount of greenspace. Airlie Gardens is a small segment of land that the County can finance
without issuing a bond. The time factor was another concern in purchasing Airlie Gardens.
Commissioner Birzenieks asked if some of the money from the bond referendum could be
used to pay for Airlie Gardens.
County Attorney Copley responded that the bond counsel will draft the question for the bond
referendum. It may require more technical language than pledging for the purchase of greenspace
and may need to list Airlie Gardens as park land for an arboretum.
Chairman Caster commented on the need to have an ad hoc committee determine how much
land is needed for park and school facilities, how much land is available, and the costs of purchasing
the properties, as quickly as possible for a bond referendum.
Mr. Jack Bragg, Chairman of the Parks Advisory Board, spoke on how the previous $5
million bond referendum was spent: $2 million was spent on the Senior Citizens Center; $2 million
to purchase 140 acres in Ogden, 54 acres in Castle Hayne, 12 acres in Wrightsboro, and 11 acres on
River Road; and $1 million was spent to design and develop Ogden and Castle Hayne Parks. The
County applied for federal and state grants and received more than $500,000 to supplement the
County’s money. The Advisory Board has discussed the need to develop a new master plan for parks
that will consider joint City and County needs. Camilla Herlevich, a former board member, helped
to establish the New Hanover County Parks Foundation. Current members are Ms. Herlevich, Vice
Chairman Greer, and Mr. Bragg. Those members will need to appoint two additional members. The
Foundation was formed to allow citizens of New Hanover County a means to donate trees and land.
Additionally, the Foundation can provide support for a bond issue.
Chairman Caster asked if the Foundation should be the group to perform the feasibility study
for a bond referendum.
Commissioner Birzenieks suggested the Ad Hoc Committee consist of five members of the
Foundation and two representatives from the school system.
Chairman Caster directed the Parks Director and County Manager to work with Mr. Bragg
and Vice-Chairman Greer to form the Committee membership. He suggested contacting Eddie
Anderson and/or Diane Avery to represent the schools. The County Manager was further
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 733
directed to report on the formation of the Committee and the time frame for proceeding with the bond
referendum at the next meeting.
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to direct staff
to proceed in working with Mr. Bragg to establish the Ad Hoc Committee with members of the Parks
Foundation and to recommend a time frame for proceeding with a bond referendum
with the intent to go before the citizens of New Hanover County no later than October or November
1999. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 TO 0.
Mr. Andy Wood, a resident of 214 Hooker Road, spoke of the need to retain open green
space in the County to protect the plants and animals that are endemic to New Hanover County.
Southeastern North Carolina is the only area that Venice flytraps can be found. He urged the
Commissioners to consider purchasing land for uses other than baseball diamonds, football fields and
soccer fields. The most endangered native forest habitat in the world is the Longleaf Pine Savannah,
such as found at Hugh MacRae Park and areas off of South 17th Street Extension. These areas in
Brunswick and New Hanover Counties are disappearing very quickly. He applauded the
Commissioners’ effort toward the Bond Referendum and requested consideration of purchasing
natural habitat areas for the preservation of wildlife.
Chairman Caster commented on the Commissioners’ full support of protecting the natural
woodland areas and thanked Mr. Woods for his comments and for his excellent program on public
radio.
County Manager O’Neal noted that the intent of the greenspace program is to purchase some
natural areas with no development of any kind, as well as some passive space with picnic areas, bike
trails, walking trails and nature trails.
CONSIDERATION OF DRAINAGE PROGRAM
Chairman Caster reported that the Commissioners, at the September 8, 1998 meeting, directed
Staff to prepare an outline of possible actions to pursue under the categories specified in the Pages
Creek Watershed Study.
Assistant County Manager Dave Weaver spoke of meeting with Chairman Caster and
Commissioner Howell on the approach the County should take regarding the drainage problems in
the County. At this point in time, the Commissioners have decided not to proceed with a
comprehensive plan for a watershed program supported by a district tax. Instead, the focus will be
on more specific problems such as the problem at Crosswinds and Hidden Valley.
It was suggested that staff begin to develop a case-by-case approach in solving specific
existing drainage problems as follows:
?
Determine who benefits from solving the problem
?
Determine the best solution to the problem
?
Assess the people who benefit and implement the solution
?
Use outside firms to perform the analysis and to manage each project
?
For a first case, analyze the Hidden Valley/Crosswinds problem
?
Research existing State statutory options under which to follow this procedure
Mr. Weaver presented an outline of possible actions the County could pursue in dealing with
various drainage concerns in the following categories:
?
Formulate and adopt drainage policies
?
Prepare and adopt drainage regulations and drainage manual
?
Prepare drainage master plans, including a stormwater database, for the different
County watersheds
?
Involve other agencies in the County’s drainage program
?
Examine long range drainage planning needs
Commissioner Davis asked if money was available from the snag and drag program to
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 734
benefit those problem areas.
Assistant County Manager Weaver said the snag and drag program can only focus on
hurricane debris; and the drainage problems in Crosswinds and Hidden Valley are not caused by
hurricane debris.
Chairman Caster commented on how the County cannot correct all problems created in the
past, but the County can prepare ordinances and regulations that will decrease impacts of future
developments. He suggested that the points of view of developers and environmentalists be
considered in the revised ordinances.
Assistant County Manager Weaver responded that initially staff will suggest some
modifications to the existing drainage ordinance to provide some quick improvements. An outside
consulting firm will be hired to develop a revised comprehensive drainage ordinance. Input will be
provided by an advisory committee represented by those who will be affected by a rewrite. Public
meetings and public hearings will be conducted to receive input from everyone.
Chairman Caster asked why it was necessary to get an outside firm to perform the rewrites
of the drainage ordinances.
Assistant County Manager Weaver explained that an outside consultant would have no
allegiance to any existing interest group within the county, and they would provide a resource of
other drainage ordinances that have been successful along the East Coast. Florida has ordinances that
seem to work. A firm which has expertise in writing ordinances, similar to those written for Florida,
may be very advantageous to New Hanover County.
Chairman Caster felt local firms should be allowed to provide bids and be evaluated on their
capabilities and costs.
Commissioner Davis asked if the work could be performed by County Staff.
Chairman Caster responded that in order to keep from hiring additional County employees
and over extending staff, hiring a consultant to begin the process will provide quicker response to the
County’s drainage problems.
Commissioner Birzenieks reiterated his concern that the County’s tax dollars should remain
in the County instead of using outside firms whenever possible.
Chairman Caster stated he reluctantly suggested to hire an outside firm because the County
has many outstanding projects to perform.
Assistant County Manager Weaver stated preparing a drainage manual will take a substantial
amount of time to prepare. Currently, the County has applied for a $1.8 million HUD grant that will
include money for a snag and drag operation.
Motion:
In discussion on the urgency of the drainage problems in the County, Commissioner
Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, to instruct staff to proceed according
to the proposed outline. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 to 0.
Break:
Chairman Caster called a break from 9:15 to 9:30 p.m.
MEETING CONVENED FROM REGULAR SESSION TO HOLD A MEETING OF THE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
Chairman Caster convened from Regular Session at 9:31 p.m. until 9:36 p.m. to hold a
meeting of the New Hanover County Water and Sewer District.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSBOOK 26
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1998PAGE 735
ADDITIONAL ITEMS - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 1354 CONCERNING THE PROPOSED
STATE BOND ISSUES FOR WATER, SEWER, AND NATURAL GAS
Chairman Caster reported the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners has
requested all counties to adopt resolutions of support for Senate Bill 1354 concerning the bond issues
for water, sewer, and natural gas and to encourage the citizens to vote in favor of the bond issues at
the polls on November 3, 1998. The bond referendum is to consider funding for $800 million
wastewater capital projects and $200 million natural gas services to under-served areas in the State.
Motion:
Commissioner Birzenieks MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Howell, to adopt the
resolution in support of the bond issues proposed by Senate Bill 1354 for water, sewer, and natural
gas and to encourage citizens to vote in favor of these bond issues at the polls on November 3, 1998.
Upon vote, the motion carried 4 to 0.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in
Exhibit Book XXIV, Page 31.
REMINDER OF OTHER BOARD MEETINGS
Chairman Caster reminded the Board of the following meetings:
1.A Closed Session will be held on Wednesday, October 7, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., in Room 301
of the County Administration Building, to interview candidates for the Tax Administrator
position.
2.A Work Session to discuss the jail expansion will be held on Thursday, October 15, 1998, at
10:00 a.m. in Room 501 of the County Administration Building.
3.A group picture of the Commissioners and Staff will be taken prior to the Board Meeting on
October 19, 1998.
WORK SESSION WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO DISCUSS DELINEATION OF
WETLANDS
To discuss the issues involving wetland delineation with the Corps of Engineers, a work
session was scheduled on Thursday, November 19, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., in Room 501 of the County
Administration Building. It was determined that representatives from the development community
should be included in the discussion to present their concerns.
Chairman Caster and County Manager O’Neal will develop an agenda to include the basic
elements of the issues based on environmental and developmental perspectives.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion:
Commissioner Davis MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Birzenieks, to adjourn.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED 4 to 0.
Chairman Caster adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Teresa P. Elmore
Deputy Clerk to the Board