1995-01-17 Regular Meeting
e
e
e
"IIIl
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 4'76
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met in Regular
Session on Tuesday, January 17, 1995, at 9:00 A.M. in the Assembly
Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third Street,
wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioners Sandra Barone; William A.
Caster; William E. Sisson, Jr.; Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr.;
Chairman Robert G. Greer; County Manager, Allen 0' Neal; County
Attorney, Wanda M. Copley; and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F.
Harrell.
Chairman Greer called the meeting to order and welcomed
everyone present.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Deputy C?unty Manager, Andrew J. Atkinson,
invocation. '
gave the
Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr. led the audience in the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
l"
NON-AGENDA iTEMS '
,i Chairman Greer inquired as to whether anyone from the'general
p~blic would ~ike to present an item not listed on the Regular
Agenda or comment on an item listed on the Consent Agenda.
:'.: ~f . ' ~'
No items or comments were received.
APPROVAL OF 'CONSENT AGENDA
4 . '
I,~ Chal.rman Greer ,requested removal of
further discussion infRegular Session.
:i~: ~.. ~ . ;!~, <^ ~ "~,,
Mot'ion: Vice:Ch'1fit-man Mathews
, Sisson to remove Consent Agenda
~ ~., J
~ items on the. .;;Consent Agenda.
;:'UNANIMOUSLY. .':: '1
-': + 4-"" . 'f
* ".
Consent Agenda Item 9 for
MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Item 9 and approve the remaining
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED
CONSENT AGENDA
."f
Approval
, The
meetings
of Minutes
commissioners approved the minutes of
as presented by the Clerk to the Board:
the
following
Regular Meeting
Work Session
December 5, 1994
December 29, 1994
., .
Adoption of Re~ol~tion for the Sale of Surplus Property Owned by
the city of wilmington and New Hanover county
\ The Commissioners adopted a resolution for the sale of surplus
property owned bY,the City of Wilmington and New Hanover County,
identified as follows:
y',. J:'Z;;. :~;~ ,~,";
.~.,
,
\;
Parcel Number
Address
Amount of Offer
R0054-09-022-017.000
t'\ ~;.." ~'
7.19 Wooster Street
$1,400.00
Offeror:
James Sampson
1?0?:. S .j~th~ Street
Wl.linl.ngton;~N. C. 28401
~:>~- ~:~;fr'
property represents ad valorem tax values as of 1989
$1,8'65,..00
I"~. ,,~'
',,~ \:c, ,.
of, the res~lution is hereby incorporated as a part of
and' rs, con'tained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
;$., .4i~,\. /- :~; .
.y,~ ~'i" .....:
..~
;'
This
totalling
A copy
tli:~ minutes
:;fl
I. ~.
j
----
I
I
I
,
M~NUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 47,7
Adoption of Resolution Regarding Sale of Surplus Property OWned by
the city of Wilmington and New Hanover County
The Commissioners adopted a resolution for the sale of surplus
property owned by the City of Wilmington and New Hanover County,
identified as follows:
Parcel Number
Address
Amount of Offer
R0054-l4-004-0ll.000
1022 S. 13th street
$1,670.00
o
Offeror: Rhonda Karen Marshall
1020 South 13th Street
Wilmington, N. C. 28401
This property represents ad valorem tax values as of 1989
totalling $1,544.00
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
Approval of Request To Increase Pet License Fee
The Commissioners approved the request to increase the pet
license fee from $8.00 to $9.00, as recommended and approved by the
Board of Health Department on December 14, 1994.
1
I
Approval of Amendments To The Regulations For Public Use of the New
Hanover county Courthouse Assembly Room
The Commissioners approved the request to amend the
regulations for public use of the New Hanover County Courthouse
Assembly Room as presented with changing the fees for use of the
room as follows: (1) Weddings - $250; (2) Private receptions and
similar events - $150; and (3) Receptions and events sponsored by
non-profit organizations and meetings sponsored by educational
civic, cultural and governmental agencies $75. The County
Manager will reserve the right to deny use of the room for any
event he deems to be inappropriate.
o
Release of Value - New Hanover county Tax Department
The Commissioners released the following late listing
penalties since the taxpayers certified they mailed their listings
during the regular listing period:
Lowery, Roger C.
Manning, Joseph R. & Mary A.
$ .58
$4.65
The Commissioners approved the following property value
adjustment because of conditions that were brought to the attention
of the Tax Department:
Jeffers, Robert D. & Emily Gail
$10,50.0
The commissioners granted Senior Citizen/Disability Exclusions
to the following taxpayers:
Bryant, Herbert L.
Chancy, Abell
Hall, Frances W.
Lane, Erma Clemmons
$15,000
13,154
15,000
15,000
o
Applications and letters concerning the late
available upon request at the Tax Department.
filing are
Acceptance of Tax Collection Reports Through December 31, 1994
The Commissioners accepted the following Tax Collection
Reports through December 31, 1994, as submitted by the Collector of
Revenue:
New Hanover County Tax Collections
New Hanover county Fire District Tax Collections
e
e
e
, .. 'J ';t;~"~ 1.'af".I;!' 'l '.I'
" i- ~)f;~<;!:~lj:;)\1f'rl~\y~:i~"::'r~ft;;,,;,:>. .
" ;l}~''-"~~Tt'Ji~',~~}..:~~~~:~~: '\',~,~~o:tll:t~ ;;
""'Ill
,
.'." ...~~~jt*, ~I'~~t):<,.
" . .~.y .'" -. . ~'" h. <:~) .
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 478
Copies of the reports are hereby incorporated as a part of the
minutes and are contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
Approval of Contract #95-0091 with the Board of Education for the
Use of Laney Tennis Courts
The Commissioners approved a contract with the New Hanover
County Board of Education for the use of Laney Tennis Courts during
non-school hours. In return, the County will pay the cost for
lighting the courts. The Chairman was authorized to execute the
necessary contract documents.
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
Adoption of Resolutions Requesting the Addition of Roads to the
State Highway system
The Commissioners adopted resolutions requesting the addition
of the following roads to the state Highway System:
Colony Circle North in Middleborough Subdivision, Sect. 2-3
Market Place Drive
Copies of the resolutions are hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and are contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
Adoption of Resolution Rescinding Previous Resolutions Supporting
Joint Venture with the City of Wilmington for the
Demolition/construction of the Downtown parking Deck
The Commissioners adopted a resolution rescinding any/all
previous resolufions supporting the joint venture with the city of
Wilmington for the Demolition/Construction of Downtown Parking
Deck.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
Approval of Request to Dispose of Jury Cards
The Commissioners,approved the request from the Register of Deeds
to dispose of, Jui""y ~cards for the years 1990, 1991, and 1992 in
accordance with N'.C..G.S. 9-7.
Adoption of Resolution to Award Contract #95-0175 to EnviroTire
Recycling Technologies L.L.C. for scrap Tire Processing
Director of Environmental Management, Ray Church, reported the
following bids wer~received:
Cross Country Recycling
(proposal did not meet specifications)
EnviroTire' Recycling-Technologies L.L.C.
u.S. Tire Recycring, L.P.
TIRES 0 ,_'" . ,
$75.00 per ton
$81. 00 per ton
$87.50 per ton
$103.00 per ton
Chairman Greer inquired as to whether EnviroTire Recycling
Technologies had received all the necessary State permits?
.,
Director Church responded that EnviroTire Recycling should
receive the State:Solid Waste permit by January 25, 1995.
;"'?
Chairman Greer recommended approving the contract contingent
upon EnviroTire R~cycling Technologies receiving the State Solid
Waste permit oy Ja?uafy 31, 1995.
~"";:=-;1, ''I\>
,;,;,q;;w, "l~~.,
Commissioner" 'Barone asked the Chairman why he was
uncomfortable with,~hetproposed contract?
~~:,!:..:"t.\ l
Chairman Greer explained there is a firm in New Hanover County
that serves 38 counties across the state with a disposal rate that
is $10 cheaper than tile rates being proposed. However, for some
. unknown reason tlj.is' qompany' s proposal is never considered by
Staff. /'). ,
~
,M.1Nt!TES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17,1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE ;47.9
Director Church reported the proposal was pa~terned after the
state's Scrap Tire Cleanup Illegal Dump site Request for Proposals,
which was to request the firms to submit a plan that would recycle
the scrap tires to remove this waste from the waste stream.
EnviroTire Recycling met the specifications of the bid at the
lowest rate for recycling scrap tires into crumb rubber. Also,
this product will probably be returned to New Hanover County for
use by local industries to make rubber bricks.
o
Motion: After further discussion, Chairman Greer MOVED, SECONDED
by Vice-Chairman Mathews to adopt a resolution awarding the bid to
EnviroTire Recycling Technologies, L.L.C. in the amount of $81.00
per ton for a term of three years contingent upon all the necessary
permits being received by January 31, 1995. If all the necessary
permits are not received within this time, the project is to be re-
bid by Staff. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is on file in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
RECOGNITION OF NEW EMPLOYEES
County Manager O'Neal introduced the following new County
employees:
Katrina Jones
Cindy Whitener
Jamie Credle
David Brunson
High Overstreet
Thomas Berry
Judy Evonko
Mike Russell
Maryann Adkins
K. Gail Alverson
Marlo Helm
Glenda Blythe
Yvonne Simpson
Kirsten Barry
Tina Coard
Steve Baldwin
Glen Walker
Aging Services
Library
Museum
Property Management
Building Inspections
Building Inspections
Health Department
Health Department
Health Department
Social Services
Social Services
social Services
social Services
Social Services
social Services
Social Services
Environmental Management
o
Chairman Greer, on behalf on the Board, welcomed the new
employees to County Government and wished them well in their new
positions.
PRESENTATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
County Manager O'Neal introduced the following employees and
requested them to step forward to receive service awards:
Five-Year Service Awards
Beverly Fountain - Finance Dept.
William F. Oakes - Tax Dept.
Miranda J. Pearce - Social Services
Carol H. Wallace - Social Services
o
Ten-Year Service Awards
Edna F. Caldwell - Sheriff
Ronnie L. Anderson - Environmental Management
Gerald McDuffie - Environmental Management
Chairman Greer, on behalf of the Board, presented
employees services awards and expressed appreciation to
employee for their years of dedicated service.
the
each
e
e
e
{~1,\"~~,..',U~~~~~r,: ~;i..i:tt.~i" :,:~" _ ._, ~i - ..
~. -. 1 .~\. ~i.'i.J":'<[;, .j)'qi''J;,,.,r;e;.;. ",,' "'lJ,l:~'lol:'~lj J
" ...,....,~";.~.:(.-.,. 4',.~:~:. "!~;" "Z< ,
""'Ill
'i#.;,ll>$~f~~t& .;"~f,~~V~;~.:t-:'t \ I.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 480
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO MR. AL HINN OF THE NATIONAL WEATHER
SERVICE
Chairman Greer, on behalf of the Board, presented a plaque to
Mr. Al Hinn in appreciation for his 20 years of service as the
Meteorologist in charge of the National Weather Service in New
Hanover County.
Mr. Steve' Glenn, representing Governor Hunt and the N. C.
Department of Emergency Services, reported on the dedicated service
given by Mr. Al Hinn and presented a plaque on behalf of the State
;of North Carolina.
A round of applause was given to Mr. Hinn.
.'
STATUS REPORT ON THE WASTEC FACILITY
Mr. Peter J. Pattinson, President of the Intertech Group,
reported in'Ap~il 19~2, the Waste-To-Energy Advisory Commission
recommended tnat the County enter into a contract with the
Intertech Group to develop recommendations to resolve problems that
were occurring at. WASTEC. At this time, there was a major dust
problem w~ich crea~ed.a water problem in the basement that
. interfered'with tii"e'performance of the boilers, caused failures in
th~ electric~~f equipment, and created additional work for
personnel. The regular standards and procedures for operation of
a Waste-to-Energy Facility were not in place nor were they being
. implemented. Maintenance was performed on a "crisis" basis, and at
:this point, the group decided the first priority was to resolve the
'dust problem arid develop'a preventative maintenance plan. This
::process entailed'check~ng thousands of feet of wiring and circuits
~~to correct the boiler. problems. A drainage program was established
"~and written procedures ~ere prepared for daily maintenance of the
'facility. Eac~ item' was a major task and hundreds of manhours were
~req~ired to,bringlthe'plant to standard performance. The hiring of
'a .Plant Manager,;. Operations Manager, and Maintenance Manager along
. with the conversion.' -of a dry ash system to a wet ash system
't.., .,' ",' . ,
li"resol ved the dust ;,problem. .
.~.. ~J 1 .l. {fil". _'i,f.-
with the impl~mentation of a maintenance program, all boilers
and turbine generators are operating on fully automated controls.
The increase ih boi~er efficiency has greatly improved, which has
maximized the revenues,generated. The CP&L electric contract has
increased as, werl "as the steam contract with Arcadian.
. Unfortunately'during the past year, Waste Management began carrying
garbage to Sampson County' which reduced the fuel supply and the
ab'ility to generate revenue at WASTEC. This loss of solid waste
'represents approxjmately $750,000 in electric generation per year
and a substantially larger loss in tip feesi however, in spite of
this loss,. st'e'iimand: electrical revenues were higher than last
" 'J ;''f .,' 't ;~;'j'
year. ,.".
1 ; ~:
In summary, the plant is capable of operating at 100% design
capacitYihowever, due to pre-scheduled maintenance for the
'boilers, the,' plant 'operates at 85% design capacity. The
.-performance of':"the:.plant should improve with design changes and if
lthis success :d~nffnues; WASTEC will be one of the best ogerated
:plants in the'~ouriBry~ .
. .;~ to 1\ t:'.-
. Vice-Chai;;~n M~€hews.expressed appreciation to Mr. Pattinson
for an excellent:report and inquired as to the risk of having a
latge fire >at "WASTEC?~r
"#,';; ,,1Ir;.{_.l-i"7;;.~
.! '. l,.' Ioi.' ;. .1).l."';{ ;:;:
,. Mr. Pattinson reported there are very few combustible
materials in the plant1t therefore, the potential is not unusually
h,ighi however;' ~if' "ii, fire should occur, the size of the water main
could be a problem wftn the water supply.
~~; i'-. ':(~ _;.~
Chairman Greer' commented on the recent damage to one of the
boilers and askedWif the .boiler is now operational?
! T \ )~< ';~~
j
,/
,~INUTES OF REGVLAR MEETING, JANUARY.17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 481
.Mr. Pattinson reported the boiler is repaired and operational.
corrective actions have been implemented to ensure this type of
incident will not occur in the future.
Chairman Greer, on behalf of the Board, expressed appreciation
for the team effort given by Intertech, the WASTEC Advisory
Committee, and staff which has enabled this facility to become
fully operational.
o
UPDATE ON MASTER SPACE & SITE PLAN ACTIVITIES AT NEW HANOVER
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND CONCURRENCE OF CONCEPT FOR USE OF
REVENUE BOND FINANCING
Mr. James Hobbs, President of New Hanover Regional Medical
Center, presented an overview of the on-going master space and site
plan activities at the New Hanover Regional Medical Center.
The following items were presented:
Phase I
Rehabilitation Hospital (completed)
Parking Deck - (completed)
Cardiovascular Projects - (many projects completed)
utilities Projects - (in the bidding process)
Tower Renovations - (near completion)
Phase II: This phase will consist of a 300,000 squar~ foot
facility, one-half new construction and one-half renovated space,
with a projected cost of $66 million to be completed in 1999 under
two phases:
Phase A - Completion in 1997
Cancer Center
Emergency Department
Pediatrics
Cent:tal sterile
Laboratory
Pharmacy
Concourse
o
Phase B - Completion in 1999
Women's Center
Neonatal Intensive Care
Labor & Delivery
Post Partum & Newborn Nursery
Neuro-Diagnostics
Surgery
The Hospital Trustees believe this plan will address immediate
needs, provide 'flexibility for future community needs, consolidate
services, provide operational efficiencies, improve patient
through.,.put, and decrease the waiting time. In order for this
project to begin, the hospital must submit a certificate of Need by
March 1, 1995; .proceed with design development; review feasibility
and bond sizing for revenue bond issue(s); and utilize revenue bond
financing.
In conclusion, the County Commissioners are being requested to
approve the concept of utilizing revenue bond financing for the
next phase of New Hanover Regional Medical Center's Master Space
and site Plan.
o
commissioner sisson inquired as to why the pediatric services
are being relocated to the 10th floor, and he urged hospital
officials to discuss this matter with the City of wilmington Fire
Department before finalizing this plan?
Mr. Hobbs reported the architects did not see any problem with
pediatric services being located on the 10th floor; however, he
would check into this matter.
e
e
e
, Xl ,f? i;,>:,~"*\?0l~~~)","~";';:,~I)'~;:' ''!','''' '" :;.;;
~ .~""i'ri!I'l.}'}.:~t.';1~W~;ti't.}ffl"i""":ilJ.<$rbi,4,"1)~ t, I I' ,
': rl' -.) ;", ' '. '
""'Ill
,
.;r "'r.~ '.- ~ .. '.j
~;...~-W.l0?;ft' lfl;~~\'~f' I ~:
, '
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 482
Motion: After discussion of the outstanding progress being made by
the hospital, Commissioner Caster MOVED, SECONDED by Vice~Chairman
Mathews to approve the concept of utilizing revenue bond financing
for the next phase of New Hanover Regional Medical Center's Master
Space & site Plan. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BREAK
Chairman Greer called a break from 10:15 A.M. until 10:39 A.M.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE WILMINGTON HARBOR ENHANCEMENT
TRUST, INC. (WHET) FOR FUNDING TO ASSIST WITH CONSTRUCTION OF
,:FLOATING DOCKS
, Mr. Randall Bray, Executive Director of WHET, Inc., expressed
appreciation to County Manager O'Neal, Assistant County Manager,
Dave Weaver, and Cape Fear Community College for their cooperation
; in"' development of, the proposed harbor enhancement plan. He
'co~ented on tliis plan being a concept through a community effort,
a~d:reported the plan addresses many of the concerns about boaters
visiting our city. He presented a funding request in the amount of
$14~625 for the proposed waterfront improvements of 248 linear feet
'of floating boat docks to be installed to the bulkheads between the
Heneritta II and the Hilton Hotel. WHET believes the proposal is
a [;reasonable approach to enhancing the recreational use of the
I:downtown riverfront. The total cost is estimated at $36,000 for
":'cohstruction of the docks and a facility that can later be
;'iurnished with water and sewer.
-;. '(l-;'.
: "
Chairman Gree~ inquired as to how the docks will be monitored?
I
Mr. Bray reported the City has volunteered the efforts of
Parks & Recreation Staff and Police Force for monitoring the docks.
, "~
.L
commissioner sisson
c~rnfuitted to ~u~d~ng the
inquired
project?
as
to whether the City has
-
.
,. .... ;~!
, Mr. Bray responded that a similar funding request will be
presented to the City Council on January 24, 1995.
~\l;.) :,
. -
" Chairman Greer reported this was another example of the County
being willing to participate in the funding of a project that would
.be' located in the City of Wilmington. He expressed appreciation to
WHET for the effort given to prepare the plan.
'Motion: commissioner Barone MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to approve the funding request in the amount of $14,625 to
WHET, Inc. contingent upon the City of Wilmington matching this
amount. Upon vote; the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
, 'J,
PUBLIC HEARING TO, ,CONSIDER. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE
THE FINANCE DiRECTOR TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THE N. C. LOCAL
GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL OF A FINANCING CONTRACT FOR THE
PURCHASE OF COASTAL;'CAROLINA UTILITIES, INC., AND G & FUTILITIES
.' Chairman Gre~r'op'ened.the Public Hearing.
. . ~".., Ji(o "LJ~ . .
F1nance D1rector, Bruce Shell, requested the Comm1ss1oners to
agppt a resolutiqn0to ~~thorize the filing of an application with
the North Caroliria.~Lqcal 'Government Commission for approval of a
financing 'cont'ract:'; for the purchase of the Coastal Carolina
Utilities, Inc", affa G}I& Futilities.
:,. ~ ':f'4.... .p.
oj. J....
Chairman Gregr inquired as to whether anyone from the general
public would like',;,to comment.
, - ~, ,:Ft .
- ("'; j",1!t)j';;i ,~: " 'r
No remarks w~fe received.
,.7 " J'
.!:~. 'I
<..~, ,;
Chairman Greer closed the Public Hearing.
~ A., "l'~
Vice-Clikir~~n Mathews MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
adopt;xhe resolution authorizing the Finance Director to
- ~~. j :
;:.;.;.1' )
Motion:
. .sisson to
.~ .:)
" '
j
l'
I
~I~U~ES OF REGULAR MEETING, ~~UAR~ 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE .483
file an application with the N. C. Local Government Commission for
approval of a financing contract for the purchase of the Coastal
Carolina utilities, Inc. and G & F Utilities. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 6,
ARTICLE IX, MONTHLY 911 CHARGE - SECOND READING
Chairman Greer announced this was the second reading of an
ordinance to establish a civil penalty for non-payment of the
monthly 911 charge. He explained that the ordinance would not
increase the monthly charge, but would assist the county in the
collecting past due fees.
Motion:
Mathews
Chapter
penalty
Sisson MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
amendment to the New Hanover County Code,
Monthly 911 Charge to establish a civil
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
commissioner
to approve the
6, Article IX,
for non-payment.
Voting Aye: Commissioner Caster
commissioner Sisson
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman -Greer
Voting Nay: Commissioner Barone
A copy of the ordinance is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 6.5, DISCRIMINATION,
OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY CODE
Chairman Greer reported the purpose of the ordinance is to
amend all references in the New Hanover county Ordinance to read
"Director" instead of Executive Director throughout the entire
code, and by-laws of the Human Relations Commission.
1
Motion: Commissioner Sisson MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to approve the amendment to the New Hanover County Code,
Chapter 6.5 to reference "Director" instead of Executive Director
throughout the code and by-laws of the Human Relations commission.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the ordinance is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XXII, Page 27.
APPOINTMENT OF JANE C. GREGORY TO SERVE ON THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY
LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD
Chairman Greer announced due to the death of Raymond E.
Riddle, there was an unexpired term on the Library Advisory Board.
After advertising the vacancy, two applications have been received
in the names of Jane C. Gregory and Lethia S. Hankins.
Chairman Greer opened the floor to receive nominations.
commissioner Barone nominated Jane C. Gregory. The nomination
~~s SECONDED by Vice-Chairman Mathews.
commissioner Sisson nominated Lethia S. Hankins. The
NOMINATION DID NOT RECEIVE A SECOND.
There being no further nominations, Chairman Greer declared
the nominations closed.
Vote: upon vote, Jane C. Gregory was appointed to fill the
unexpired term on the New Hanover County Library Board of Trustees
to expire August 31, 1996, by the FOLLOWING VOTE:
o
o
o
e
e
e
..~., J't Jtti.i!~,;:~\yt;:;;G1~';~j,{;'y~j:~'r\C':'~~f}t.~~/:1
, '~tf<:~',;~i"~:rf~'> ~"~~'A' ,
""Ill
......!~~~d ~:"':ft."J. . ~ ,; ~." .
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 48'4
voting Aye: Commissioner Barone
Commissioner Caster
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Greer
voting Nay: Commissioner sisson
MEETING CONVENED FROM REGULAR SESSION TO HOLD A MEETING OF THE NEW
HANOVER COUNTY WATER , SEWER DISTRICT
Chairman Greer convened from Regular Session at 10: 49 A.M.
until 11:20 A.M. to hold a meeting of the New Hanover County Water
and Sewer District.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ~ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Discussion of Bidding Process
Chairman Greer expressed concern for the bidding process used
during the wat:~r&' :sewer District meeting and requested Staff to
cI~rify the bi:ddi"ngtprocess to avoid mixed signals when trying to
select an engineering;"firm for a capital project.
~ ':'; " ,
4
commissioner i:fis'son agreed and reported Staff should implement
some mechanism for establishing qualifications.
t" .. 2~.
~ ....
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to direct Staff to
,work out a better blading procedure in selecting an engineering
fIrm for capit~l prqjects.
','
, ,/,
BREAK .
Chairman Greer called a break from 11:35 A.M. until 11:45 P.M.
Discussion of Letter to be ,written to Industries on the Highway 421
:.- .,...- r
No'r,th Corridor, , .' "
,~;",;i'l'}c, Commission'er tSiss~n inquired as to how the fire service
funding reque~t .s~~uld~be written to the industries on the Highway
,,14:t1~ North Coi~,fd6f'" Yfh,ether by the financial abilities of the
,industries, or'byJthe hazardous potential?
~. };, ~ '~,:~'.. ;it, :;~ '..,.
Chairman Greer reported some companies are already paying the
City with no stru;ctu:r;,ed amount; therefore, in his opinion, the
question to be answered is whether each company is willing to pay
for a higher level ~of f~re protection on the 421 North Corridor and
if so, how much? "\' '
t,,'
After further,discussion, Commissioner Sisson was directed to
write each company;and asked if the firm would pay for providing a
higher level of 'fire protection on the industrial corridor.
. y ,!!
Discussion of pro~osed~Annexation by the city of Wilmington
J" Chairman Gre~r commented on the presentation by the City
regarding the proposedfannexation plan and reported it appeared the
'Ci~y was movincr',fp~~aT~3;wi;th the plan. After many telephone c.alls,
tl}e County re,sl.de.9-ts~~ee.1 they would be better served wl.th a
consolidated goverriment'l.or, the consolidation of various departments
and services wlth{A th~ttw~ governments. He commented on the need
for the County ,'t::o ,'respon~ to this issue and requested authorization
'to write a letter",t'i:> t::h'"e City Council to encourage both bodies to
work togetheriri;cons6~idating the governments or services in lieu
. .~" ~''*t ,~ , '
of annexatl.on. ,,..:.}",;,," ,Iii
~. h~' .',
Commissioner Barone inquired as to whether the Commissioners
had given any" ser;"i::qus' consideration to Mayor Betz' s request to
redistribute the ;:s~;les~tax revenue?
JS"~lf.:' -Ih':i;7 t,.
Chairman Gree,I: reported the County is willing to work with the
c~ty in trying ,.tp a~dress the sales tax distribution issue;
ho~ever, he, persohally~ is 'not willing to give the City $2 million
"hi'i';; year. He .:w6).h,d 'be willing to begin at a certain point and
" _ ,,:,."It :~ '" . , r.';~."., _ ;- _~
wo'rk out a plan"from that date forward.
~ ~ ',. 'J'f~~~ ~~?
j
,/
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 485
commissioner Caster commented on the need to consolidate and
reported he is in favor of total consolidation of both governments.
Commissioner sisson expressed concern for not knowing whether
the sales tax revenue distribution issue came from the Mayor or
from the entire city Council. He stated in order to decide on this
matter, he needs to know that all members of the city council are
in agreement with the proposed annexation or sales tax
redistribution. In his opinion, the Board of County Commissioners
should prepare a formal written statement on consolidation. As to
the County experiencing a loss of $2 million in sales tax revenue
within a year, he could not support this idea; however, he would
consider some type of formula to be phased in over a period of
time.
o
q
commissioner Barone asked if staff had checked with other
urbanized counties to see how tlJ.e sales tax revenue was being
distributed?
County Manager O'Neal reported other urbanized counties and
cities do distribute the sales tax revenue through different
formulas; however, Staff is in the process of checking into this
matter, and the Board will receive a report shortly.
.., .Commissioner Barone stated if reallocation of the sales tax
revenue would stop annexation, she would be willing to consider a
different formula from a certain date forward with phasing in the
distribution schedule. She reported as a former member of the
Wilmington city Council, she understands the need for the city to
expand its tax base; therefore, she is open to checking into a more
equitable distribution of the sales tax revenue.
Commissioner Caster reported the City will either annex or
consolidate; therefore, in his opinion, the county should proceed
with total consolidation of the two governments.
o
!
I
Motion: Commissioner Caster MOVED to inform the Wilmington city
Council that New Hanover County will proceed with consolidation of
the City and county governments and place this issue before the
voters for approval. The floor w?s opened for discussion.
Commissioner sisson reported he will SECOND THE MOTION because
a clear signal should be forwarded to the Wilmington City Council
informing them that New Hanover County will proceed with
consolidation. If the Commissioners decide it would be better to
consolidate various services and departments and leave the
governmental bodies intact, he would have no problem with this
method of consolidation.
Chairman Greer inquired as to whether the MOTION means.~otal
consolidation of the City and County governments?
commissioner Caster responded he intends for the MOTION to be
total consolidation.
Chairman Greer expressed concern for the MOTION being total
consolidation and asked if commissioner Caster would also consider
consolidation of departments and services.
o
Amended Motion: commissioner Caster AMENDED THE MOTION, SECONDED
by Commissioner sisson to authorize the Chairman to write a letter
to the Mayor and inform the City Council that New Hanover County is
going to proceed with total consolidation of the two governments or
consolidation of the various departments and services in lieu of
annexation. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Report on Legislative Goals Conference held on January 3-6, 1995
, Chairman Greer reported he was opposed to many of the
legislative goals that were ~dopted at the N. c. Association of
e
e
e
~\~~'fI;~ '~~J;:F'~~:~;:~~fftw~1;i.~t~f"
"""'Ill
...l,,' ~.,~<~ot. :!~"-,,,~,_,
\ :~~'fl'~l"""f: ':;-.:'-;":":"!'.\.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 486
County Commissioners' Legislative Goals Conference held on January
3-6, 1995; however, the conference was most informative and a major
topic of conversation was whether increased funding would be
available from the state.
Vice-Chairman Mathews reported the County Commissioners
opposed five goals which were also opposed by the Voting Delegates
from the 100 counties.
Discussion of Reception held for the New Director of the
Southeastern Center
Commissioner Caster reported on enjoying the nice dinner and
reception held at the Southeastern Center. He complimented
commissioner sisson for the excellent job he has performed as the
County's representative on the Southeastern Center Board. Many of
the persons present were very pleased with the manner in which
Commissioner Sisson had handled a difficult situation, and Staff
was most complimen~ary of his support during the entire ordeal.
Discussion of Schools
Commissioner Sisson commented on the new proposal by the Board
of Education to change the schedule for elementary and secondary
school students and reported this has created concern because of
day care problems that could be incurred and teachers being
required to'wor,k another hour with no compensation. He recommended
informing the Board of Education about these concerns when meeting
with them to discuss various issues.
..! ,;\
; ,"",
COUNTY ATTORNEY -'ADDITIONAL ,ITEMS
Authorization for the Chairman to Enter Into a Settlement Agreement
with Leader Construction Company
County Attorney Copley requested the Commissioners to
authorize the Chairman to ".enter into a settlement agreement with
Leader construct:i:6n',Company in th!,! amount of $12,500 for completion
of minor repairs at the Senior Center. Staff feels the settlement
is reasonable, and,before the County can receive the check, it must
enter into the'pr,opo:;ed agreement.
Motion: Commissioner Barone MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Caster
to authorize the Chairman to enter into a settlement agreement with
Leader Construction Company in the amount of $12,500 for repairs
that were not properly 'completed at the Senior Center. The floor
was opened for discussion.
Chairman Greer inquired as to why the County negotiates with
th~ bonding company and does not automatically recover the full
amount of the .?on9?
,.
County Attorney Copley reported bonding companies take the
position that contractors are responsible for poor work, not
bonding co~pariies; "therefore, they negotiate for settlement. In
her opinion, 'loc,d governments are mislead by bonding companies
because the bords4 do not fully protect the government. In this
case, the CountY:{lI!ade a demand on the bonding company for the
uricompleted repairs'; and the bonding company refused to pay. The
County,. then sued~, Leac;ler 'Construction Company and the bonding
company. The Court ruled in favor of New Hanover County, and Staff
has been in the~p~o~~s~,of.trying to negotiate a settlement.
~:t ~' '" "~{ .:'
Chairman Gfeer ~nqtired as to the maximum amount of the bond?
County Attorney Copley reported the bond was originally for
the total cost ,of.,the proJect; however, the project was completed
with the exception '.of. the minor repairs.
........ ,...."". ~ ~l ;'
Chairman Greer calIed,for a vote on the MOTION to enter into
the settlement agteemeh~ ~ith the bonding company in the amount of
;.i '~t-", .~../ji, ";:;~, ~:r
j
/
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 487
$12,500 as recommended by the County Attorney.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Upon vote, the
Update on New Animal Control Center
County Manager O'Neal reported the construction of the Animal
Control Center is moving satisfactorily. Once the completion date
is announced, the Board will be informed.
Seafood Dinner Scheduled for Members of the N. C. General Assembly
on Wednesday, April 12, 1995
County Manager O'Neal reported the Seafood Dinner for the
members of the N. C. General Assembly has been tentatively
scheduled for April 12, 1995. If this date is satisfactory with
the Board, Brunswick, Columbus, and Pender counties will be
contacted for funding participation.
o
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the
Seafood Dinner on April 12, 1995, at the State Fair Grounds with
the County Manager being requested to contact the other counties
for funding participation.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Greer adjourned the meeting at 12:25 P.M. and
reported a Work Session to discuss development of a County Solid
Waste Collection System will be held at 1:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
. r
o
Clerk to the Board
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION
The New Hanover county Board of commissioners held a Work
Session on Tuesday, January 17, 1995, at 1:30 P.M. in the Assembly
Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third street,
wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioners Sandra Barone; William A.
Caster; William E. Sisson, Jr.; Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr.;
Chairman Robert G. Greer; county Manager, Allen O'Neal; County
Attorney, Wanda M. Copley; and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F.
Harrell.
Chairman Greer called the Work Session to order and welcomed
everyone present. He announced the purpose of the meeting was to
discuss the development of a Solid Waste Collection System fo~ New
Hanover County.
~ County Manager O'Neal reported at the meeting held on April 5,
1994, Staff was directed to develop a framework for establishing a
County Collection system for residential and commercial solid
waste, if flow control was found to be unconstitutional by the
united States Supreme Court. In May, 1994, the Supreme Court found
flow control to be unconstitutional, and Congress did not enact
legislation to rectify the situation. As a result of the this
action, the County Staff has developed the following options for
establishment of a county Collection System.
o
OPTION I: ESTABLISH A COUNTY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION. SYSTEM
A county Collection System would accomplish - the following
objectives:
e
e
e
, ~. "1'<",..-., """"''Y'l~'i)1)i':'"''
;'..., "".
""""Ill
':l:i~~i.
,"1"
, '
."i~;" ~.~, ,."
,.. ~~~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 488
1. Provide a full range of solid waste collection services to all
customers, including recyclables, yard waste, and bulky item pick-
up.
2. Provide collection services with maximum efficiency and
economy.
3. Contract with private solid waste haulers to the greatest
extent possible in the County Collection System.
4. Ensure the State mandated economic
disposal of soli4 waste through the
collections.
and environmentally sound
control of solid waste
5. Recover all costs of the County Collection System and of the
Environmental Management Department through user fees billed
through the collection system and through sales of steam,
eiectricity, and'recyclables, with no use of property tax or other
genera~ fund revenues.
COMMERCIAL COLLECTION:
,.~
,-The existing free market system of negotiation between private
haulers and commercial clients would remain.
,. :\;
'.i
-The County would maintain the existing system to the greatest
,extent possible using the haulers as County agents.
-T~e County would contrac~ with private haulers to collect
commercial solid waste for the County Collection System.
,
-The contract would specify such
per10rmance bond, d~sposal sites,
:~bil:ling. :~', _, ."
" i i
-The County will contract with a third party private accounting
fi~rm to administer bflling and contract with the haulers. The
~purpose'of usirlg a private accounting firm would alleviate concerns
~ihat have been~expressed by the haulers relative to confidentiality
'of records. <: '.
!j :J,
conditions as equipment,
and hardware/software for
,
In summary, the haulers'would contract with commercial clients
to collect their solid waste. The existing free market system for
collecting commerci?l solid waste would remain intact except for
the billing. All commercial clients would be free to negotiate and
contract for any level of service with any hauler. The private
accounting firm would ,maintain a list of qualified haulers for use
by commercial cli:ents'~ Once the client and a hauler agreed upon a
contract, the hauler 'would notify the private accounting firm by
su~mittinga standard work order signed by both the client and the
hauler. The privat~a6counting firm would immediately verify the
~ork order witht~h~~cli~nt~ examine its records for any outstanding
~d~gt owed by t~e c~ierF, and then authorize the work order. The
hauler would be':paid ,monthly by the County for all completed work
orders, upon noti6e;'by~;the private accounting firm.
.... ~-(').
Of _..
,~ ., The commercial client would pay the County through the third
party private:,acc~unti,ng firm. The private accounting firm would
, se~d one biIY~{rp~~th~;,county to the client with one amount that
',would cover both'tne,cost of collection and disposal. The cost of
collection would be..negotiated between the client and hauler. The
cost of dispo~~~~woul~Sbe' determined by the amount of solid waste
~ generated by the,cliein:!i and designed to recover all County costs.
An',initial deposit",6f'L~ne .month's service would be required of all
t conjinercial client's." ',The Legal Department would be responsible for
, the..-collection' 'of bad" debts. Complaints from commercial clients
\ would be directed ,thrp,ugh the private accounting firm.
\' . ...';.' Y .. II <
. &1.1,) ,'-)
t '~'~~ '1.'\:c
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 489
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION: The existing .residential collection system
is a patchwork of haulers operating throughout the County with
negotiations between the residents and the haulers. The system now
has overlapping routes and the County would like to provide a more
efficient system that would eliminate the overlapping of routes;
provide a full range of collection services (trash, yard-waste,
bulky items, white goods, recyclables) while using haulers for
collection.
In order to achieve this goal, the County would establish five
zones in the unincorporated County for residential collections.
Each zone would be contracted out to one private hauler to perform
exclusive collection services with the following elements: (1) the
hauler must provide solid waste pick-up, yard waste pick-up,
recyclable pick-up, and bulky item pick-up for households in a
zone. The hauler could sub-contract out these services; (2) the
process for contracting out zones to haulers could be through
competitive bidding or through negotiations.
Contracts would have staggered terms up to eleven years to
allow stability for residents and the haulers. The contracts would
be adjusted yearly by the Consumer Price Index. Special provisions
would be made for additional service for the elderly and
handicapped. A 90 gallon solid waste container and recycling
container would be provided to each household. All transition
costs would be borne by the hauler.
The County would contract with the same third party private
accounting firm used for commercial solid waste collection to
administer the billing for the residential clients. The
residential solid waste haulers would be paid by the County through
the private accounting firm bi-monthly under the contract
provision. The private accounting firm,would also be responsible
for billing residential clients bi-monthly. Residential clients
would pay the County through the private accounting firm.
Residential clients would be billed through property ownership and
not by tenantship. This approach, similar to the billing mechanism
used by the County.Water and Sewer District, would eliminate the
need to require deposits and greatly reduce costs to the County.
All households would receive service and all residential owners
would be billed. Bills would be from the County as administered by
the private accounting firm. The Legal Department would be
responsible for collection of all bad debts. The bill submitted to
the residential client from t~e County through the, private
accounting firm would show one amount that includes.both the cost
of collection and disposal, similar to the method outlined for
commercial collection. Complaints would be handled through the
private accounting firm.
"
The financing objective of this option would be to recover all
costs associated with solid waste collection and Environmental
Management functions (WASTEC, Landfill, Recycling, Administration).
Charts and figures were presented on projected cost of residential
trash collection in the unincorporated County with an estimated
cost of $70.36 per household per year or $5.86 per household per
month based upon $10,555,000 net disposal costs.
"The cost for ,commercial clients would be based on. the volume of
trash collected for each client. Because there is no way to
accu~ately measure the weight of trash generated' for each
commercial client, volume must be used as the surrogate measure.
The method would involve an estimate of the total volume of
commercial trash collected in the County based on the size of all
commercial trash containers and their frequency of collection.
This data would be provided by the haulers prior to billing by the
private accounting firm. without this data at this time, it is not
possible to say what the disposal cost would be except 'that the
cost would be higher than at the present time. .
o
o
o
e
e
e
,~ .'~i,.'*'t;",!:i~';!"" ~it!r~;\!'';~'<''''\~~')T':9 .~.. "\:.~
v.. '...r .
"'IIIl
\~~",;\..'il'J...~ i~'
I.'<~,,'r,:.,,<;
.'~ ,'- -;-"~':;~:~~' ~'"
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 490
The contract with a private accounting firm is estimated at
$300,000 per year. The need for additional personnel for the
County's Legal, Finance, and Environmental Management Departments
is estimated at $100,000 per year.
Additional considerations are as follows:
A. Leqal Exposure:
-Disposal at WASTEC and the Landfill is important to minimize
economic and environmental liability.
, "t
-Regulatory flow control is unconstitutional. The County's
collection system may face successful legal challenges. The
County 'could establish a "safety valve" policy for immediate
tip fee reduction to prevent challenges. The County
collection. system would disrupt existing contracts.
. .
~ .. .~
B. Mu~i~ipalities:
-City and towns would be charged appropriate disposal fee for
residential solid waste, or could join the County system.
. "
-The County system for commercial trash would be county-wide.
.
"
C. Individuals Haulinq Their Own Waste:
-Individual ~ommercial clients may wish to save on collection
costs .by hauling solid waste to County facilities.
'\:. " I
-Indivfdual households' would not save money because collection
will be available!.to all residents and County billing would be
mandatory? 'w,',
" 'jo, "l'
D.," Collections for Private'Residential Areas:
'. ,1."<'
-Private subdivisions with homeowners' associations may
contract. out;,toJa' hauler under the commercial system as long
as~the~contiact provIdes, at a minimum, the level of service
the courity,,'would ''o~fer.
I \ ~
.,('" l'
E. Out-of-CountvSolid Waste:
, ,
, " .
-The County could continue to seek out-of-county solid waste
and charge tip fees.
-A large pot~ntial for abuse exists because tip fees would not
be ch2!rged, tp hal,llers under the contract;: with the County.
Careful monitoring would be needed, and haulers violating
their contracts would..be prosecuted.
, ..
, '1 ~.
F. Initial Transition Period:
,
-The trans1tion from the present system to a County collection
system .would.be d~fficult. Approximately 25,000 households
and 5, OO!,> cc5~.eli},c;Ial" clients in the uninc;:orporated County
w(:>uld havelto"slgn ,up' for the County collectlon system. Trash
container's, f6r the residential customers would have to be
shuttled from zone to zone initially. The bureaucracy of
initiating. and:imp.lementing the County collection system would
- _~ ,_. d.!::;J.. ,~. .
be expenslve and cumbersome.
~' .'."" 1'> .1-
" ; J.t:',
-A public information.program would be needed.
~, I~,
-An ordiniiice establishing authority of the County to
implement a'colle~~i6n system would be required. Also, the
County' would need~OJ1.tracts between the County and hauler for
commercial col1ection;: the County and haulers for residential
collecti~n; a~d tfi~ County and the private accounting firm.
...4
~INUT~S OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WOR~,SESSION
PA.GE 491
OPTION II: ESTABLISH AN ECONOMICALLY COMPETITIVE TIP FEE THROUGH
A TRANSFER FROM THE GENERAL FUND
The establishment of an economically competitive tip fee is
the most effective way to fund County solid waste management
facilities. The best way to develop a competitive tip fee is to
support Environmental Management Fund expenditures through the
transfer of general fund revenues.
The rationale behind a general fund transfer includes the
following:
o
-Debt service must be paid regardless of the future of the
Environmental Management Fund facilities.
-Administration and Recycling budgets should be paid by the
general fund because these functions cover numerous issues
beyond normal commercial solid waste disposal facilities, such
as the Burn pit management, property analysis, support for the
Water and Sewer District, and compliance with State recycling
and solid waste planning legislation.
-The County has already committed a general fund transfer of
approximately $5.2 million this year.
Significant advantages for option II are as follows:
(1) A competitive tip fee of $30 per ton would be
established. Haulers may be willing to bring solid waste to
the County facilities, resulting in the environmentally sound
disposal of solid waste and in the support of County
facilities by the haulers. The County would need to commit on
a long-term basis to a competitive tip fee to provide
assurance to the haulers.
(2) There would be no need for the County to
commercial collection system, reducing the
bureaucracy,and significant expense.
establish a
need for
o
(3.) A low tip fee would make it easier to attract out-of-
county solid waste, further increasing revenues.
(4) Although a general fund transfer would require possibly
7.5 cents in the tax rate, homeowners itemizing deductions
would gain at least some benefit by income tax reduction.
Homeowners would not gain this benefit if required to pay for
disposal costs as proposed in option I.
(5) The general fund transfer of $6.05 million would be
mitigated by an increase in sales tax revenues of $577,975
allocated to the County.
A lengthy discussion was held on both options. Assistant
County Manager Weaver. reported the haulers were overwhelmingly in
favor of option II because they do not want to become involved with
a collections system.
Commissioner sisson inquired as to whether option II would
guarantee the residential collection of trash, yard waste, bulky
items, white goods,. and recyclables?
o
Assistant County Manager Weaver responded Option II would not
guarantee the provision of these residential services. The trash
would be collected as presently performed; however, there would be
the possibility of implementing a residential collection system
under Option II.
_. A ,lengthy 'discussion was held on the volume estimated for the
fiscal'year.' Director of Environmental Management, Ray Church,
presented figures and charts showing the tons received at WASTEC
e
e
-
-'''''',.,..,' '7--:-'f;',\1"';--'(,-r;.-,rrr-,.
......
1l~~-';:'';' 'i',~'~)'
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 492
and the Landfill. Due to the loss of tonnage to the Sampson County
Landfill and the inability of the County to adopt a flow control
,ordinance, the total loss of revenues is projected at $6,316,728.
However, with the maj or improvements at WASTEC, the potential
revenue is projected at $7.6 million when the plant is operating at
85% capacity. Also, there is the potential to generate electrical
sales in the amount of $3 million per year at $30 per ton with
140,000 tons going through the facility. He presented three budget
scenarios with flow control at $30 per ton, $35 per ton, and $60
per ton, which reflected the amount of revenue that had been lost
without a flow control ordinance. Other figures and charts were
presented on the amount of waste incinerated and the amount of
Landfill space that had been saved.
commissioner ,Caster inquired as to whether any other local
governments are using a private accounting firm to perform the
collections system?
Finance Director, Bruce Shell,
governments use this type, of ,system,
u~ed the system very successfully.
Commissioner caste~ commented on contracting to five different
zones and inquired as to how the price would remain the same in
each zone? .. ;
responded no other local
but private utilities have
Assistant County Manager Weaver explained that prices may be
different in the five zones; however, the County would average the
cost and every: res,~den~_would be charged the same price.
~ .... .'.
I. . ", .
" A lengthy dl.scussl.on was held on the cost of burnl.ng trash and
the definitions"of; volume, tons received, and the reduction of the
wa'ste stream. " ':', ,"; '.,,,
";0') '\ "0' ..., ,_
Chairman Greer commented on the figures presented for the
month of December, 1994, and reported the total refuse received at
WASTEC was 7,345 tons with 1,633 tons left in the pit from the
'previous month;:however, the amount of tonnage burned for December
was 8,289 tons: This means that more tonnage was burned than
rec'eived with :;6'89 tons left in the pit. Out of the 8,289 tons
burned, 3,244 tons 'were unburnable and carried to the Landfill,
w~lch represents a 61% reduction. If these figures are carried at
,~a" maximum capacity, WhiSh ,is 90,748 tons per year, the amount being
'burned is extremelY",costly. If the 90,748 tons were carried to
yan?,ther facility at $2,,5 per ton, the cost would be $2,268,000
',(versus $5,241;~000' to operate WASTEC. Basically, the County is
paying more than... doubl.e the cost for the privilege of burning
,tr~sh. The qU'est~oJ;l '1:0 be answered is whether burning trash is
worth the cost?r, ~,,<t '.
.~ County Manager j,9'Ne~1 responded the bottom line is volume
reduction and' t,h~ savf1,gs \'is in Landfill space.
, .. ,~f> -1',,*,
. .~l:1~Y""~
Further dis~ussfori was held on the weight and volume
" 0, .' ".' c
,~: ded.uctl.on. Cha'l,rman Greer .reported 65% of 139,613 tons represents
i: 9.0,748 tons, w)1iteh ,rep'resents the actual amount of tons being
'I disposed. If the 90,74'S 'tons'is divided by the cost of WASTEC in
, the' amount of $5,241,912, which does not include the cost for the
_"Landfill, Administrat'i'O'n, Recycling, etc., the County is paying $56
j", W . _ 1". ,.."'St..
" per" ton to burn~'garba'ge versus $25 per ton to carry the trash to
sampson County':' '
f:::, '
. ~J; ;1'f:~ ..
I' '., Dl.rector Church,~,r!"pofte~ thl.s fl.gure does not include the
revenue generated fr?!ll" .~lectrl.c sales.
" ' ;?~~~~.: ~\
Chairman Gt~!,,~,,!?'again reiterated, the Commissioners must
det'~rmine if the C6ur(ty.~'shoUld continue to burn trash at this cost.,
~ ::- "/ ~"f$ .{,rj;
$t '?,'.
j
~
/
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY, 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 493
Discussion was held on the County being responsible. for the
state regulations governing the reduction of the waste stream.
Director Church stated the state holds each County responsible for
its Solid Waste Plan and infor~ed the Board that solid waste cannot
be abandoned by the County because the trash is carried out of the
county. He stated with residential collection, curbside recycling,
yard waste collection, bulky item collection, the WASTEC Facility,
the Landfill, the C&D Facility, and the scrap tire program, New
Hanover County would have the first integrated waste management
plan in the State. In his opinion, it would be difficult for the
State to deny the County the 10-15% reduction for incineration.
Chairman Greer complimented Director Church and Staff for the
improvements that have been made to the WASTEC facility and stated
the purpose of the incinerator was to make money for the County.
Through the years with the various maintenance problems and
environmental regulations, this goal has not been achieved. Even
with the plant operating efficiently, who knows what future state
and federal regulations will be placed on the disposal of solid
waste which will increase the operation of the plant. The County
has reached the point where it must look very closely at the costs
involved with operating these facilities and decide what is the
be~t direction for the County to follow in the disposal of solid
waste.
Director Church expressed concern for the hard work and effort
given during th~ past three years to bring the plant its current
operating capacity, and stated to reach this point and be denied an
opportunity to show the plant's potential is quite frustrating.
commissioner sisson reported if the County should contract for
trash services, the County would be at the mercy of that contractor
when renegotiating the contract. Also, the environmental
consequences of landfills have not been fully explored, which could
become a grave environmental concern in the future.
Chairman Greer agreed with commissioner sisson and stated, in
his opinion, burning trash is the best method; however, the
question to be answered is whether incineration is worth the costs
when the federal and state governments continue to penalize the
local governments for burning trash.
Mr. Eddie Dick, representing Waste Industries, reported on the
uncertainties of the county's responsibilities if the WASTEC
Facility is not operational. Under the present collection system,
the County has one of the highest percentages of residential
homeowners having door to door collection in the State of North
Carolina. The WASTEC Facility and the Landfill are assets, and the
return on these assets should be maximized. In his opinion, the
County should allow the Director of Environmental Management and
Staff to show that WASTEC can operate and become cost effective.
In summary, the generators of the waste will have to pay the cost
for solid waste disposal regardless of what system is implemented.
Mr. Chris McKeithan, representing Waste Management, reported
in the last two years, the WASTEC Facility has greatly improved;
however, for 10 years, the facility was not operating in an
efficient manner. The County must consider the difference in cost
for burning solid waste versus hauling the waste, and if
incineration is the most environmentally sound way to dispose of
solid waste with current discussion about ash as a hazardous waste
and more stringent air emissions? In his opinion, these questions
must be addressed. Waste Management desires to work with the
county, but when the cost of disposal reached $60 per ton, the
company has no choice but to carry the waste out of the county.
Once the County establishes a long-term rate of $30 per ton as
listed in option II, the haulers will use the WASTEC Facility. He
requested the Commissioners to provide direction to the haulers.
o
o
o
e
e
e
,r:", '. :,';?f-.;~tj'~1;"
"""'l1lI
-i1;;Qi..
,. . ~
~ ~:~t;~i'
MINUTES OF REGUL~ MEETING, JANUARY 17, 1995
AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL WORK SESSION
PAGE 49'4
commissioner Caster inquired as to whether Waste Management
would bring the tra~h back into New Hanover County if the tip fee
remains at $30 per tori?
Mr. McKeithan responded the trash would remain in New Hanover
County at $30 per ton.
Chairman Greer reported he felt the haulers had. agreed to
using the County facilities at $35 per ton.
Mr. McKeithan responded "$35 per ton would be the limit for
Waste Management.
Consensus: After discussion for the need to study the options
pr~sented, it was the consensus of the Board to schedule a Work
?ession on February'2, 1995, at 10:30 A.M. in Room 501 of the New
Hanover County Administration Building after the regular Staff
meeting. 4:
ADJOURNMENT
. . Chairman Greer expressed appreciation to all persons present
for their comments and adjourned the meeting at 3:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
~F~~
Clerk to the Board
...4