HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-01 Consolidation Work Session
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 649
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners and Wilmington
City Council held a Consolidation Study Commission meeting on
Monday, May 1, 1995, at 8:15 A.M. in the Madeline Suite of the
University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 601 South College Road,
Wilmington, North Carolina.
Members present were: Commissioners Sandra Barone; WilliamA.
Caster; William E. Sisson, Jr.; vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews, Jr.;
Chairman Robert G. Greer; County Manager, Allen 0' Neal; County
Attorney, Wanda M. Copley; and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F.
Harrell.
Members present from the Wilmington City Council were: Mayor
Don Betz; Mayor Pro-Tern Katherine B. Moore; Councilmembers J. D.
Causey; Hamilton E. Hicks, Jr.; Laura Padgett; Charlie Rivenbark;
Michael Youngblood; City Manager, Mary Gornto; City Attorney, Tom
Pollard; and City Clerk, Penelope Spicer-Sidbury.
Chairman Greer and Mayor Betz called the respective boards to
order.
Chairman Greer requested the Charter Committee to present a
report.
Councilmember Rivenbark requested time to discuss the bill
introduced by Representative Danny McComas before hearing the
report by the Charter Committee. He reported on April 4, 1995,
the Wilmington City Council adopted a resolution to oppose the bill
introduced by Representative McComas. Concern was expressed for
hearing that a resolution of support had been prepared for the
Commissioners to consider at the regular meeting scheduled that
evening. He commented on the time and effort given by the members
of both governing bodies to study the consolidation issue, and
asked if the Commissioners were in favor of the proposed bill, and
if so, what could the proposed Task Force accomplish that had not
already been done by the subcommittees?
Chairman Greer advised that he was not opposed to the bill
since it had been amended to prohibit the legislature from
appointing persons to serve on the local Task Force. He explained
that the Task Force would be composed of six members from the City,
six members from the County, and one member from each beach
committee. As to the differences in duties of the proposed Task
Force, he could not answer; however, in his opinion, Representative
McComas felt the Consolidation Study Commission could become bogged
down on certain issues and the voters would not be given an
opportunity to vote on consolidation before the City moved forward
with its annexation plan. Also, the bill would allow more time for
the consolidation plan to be prepared.
Councilmember Rivenbark strongly objected to the Commissioners
even considering a resolution of support and requested the City
Attorney to present a brief overview of the proposed bill.
City Attorney Pollard reported the bill would establish a Task
Force to review the consolidation of the City and County, the
consolidation of one or more City and County functions, and the
annexation laws for New Hanover County. The bill authorizes the
Task Force to perform a consolidation study, study annexation laws,
create a consolidated local government including the local
governments of the beach communities, study other possible local
government structures, prepare a report on its findings, and
prepare an ordinance or legislation to call for a referendum on
these items. A referendum could be called on any plan proposed
wi th more than one issue placed on the ballot. No plan would
become effective until approved by the General Assembly except for
a plan relating to annexation. The Task Force would be charged
with holding regular meetings and directed to present the plan to
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 650
the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners and Wilmington
City Council without being required to receive final approval from
either government.
Councilmember Padgett expressed concern for the Commissioners
being supportive of a bill that would allow the State Legislature
to interfere in the local consolidation effort with the ability to
provide a structure of government to be presented to the voters
without approval by the City or County.
Councilmember Youngblood strongly objected to a bill which
would allow non-elected officials, who are not responsible for
levying the tax rates and preparing budgets, to have authority to
prepare a consolidation plan and schedule the referendum. He
stated, in his opinion, this would be setting a bad precedent for
any future consolidation effort throughout the State.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore agreed with Councilmember Youngblood and
reported the City Council had taken action to proceed with studying
consolidation and, in her opinion, the Consolidation Study
Commission should move forward within the time frame outlined. She
pointed out that every member of the Board of County Commissioners
and the Wilmington City Council had voted in good faith to proceed
with a consolidation study; therefore, both bodies should carry out
this action.
vice-Chairman Mathews reported the County Commissioners as a
group had not voted to endorse the McComas bill. He stated, for
the record, he was opposed to the bill and felt the subcommittees
were moving forward with developing a plan for an October
referendum. He cautioned delaying this issue when the people
throughout the County are behind the consolidation effort.
Councilmember Youngblood expressed concern for no growth in
the City and reported the annexation plan had been on the table
since 1979 with 60,000 people in the City supporting the
infrastructure needs for 130,000 people, which, in his opinion, was
not a healthy situation for the City.
Commissioner Sisson expressed concern for any rational person
feeling the City of Wilmington was providing infrastructure needs
for 130,000 people. He reported County residents were not asking
for City services and did not want to be annexed because they felt
everything would be lost with nothing gained. In his opinion, the
Consolidation Study Commission was formed to develop a government
that would be more efficient and better serve its citizens. If
both the City Council and Board of County Commissioners cannot work
together in forming a more efficient government, then the idea
should be dismissed.
Councilmember Rivenbark responded he had no desire to
discontinue the consolidation process; however, he was gravely
concerned about the proposed resolution of support for the McComas
bill to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners.
After further discussion, Chairman Greer stated members of the
Board were cognizant of the fact that members of the City Council
had been holding meetings on annexation informing people that the
City was planning to move forward with its plan. These meetings
were held after the formation of the Consolidation Study
Commission, which has caused great concern among the citizens of
the unincorporated county as well as questioning the true intent of
the City Council in preparing and presenting a consolidation plan
to the voters in October.
Councilmember Youngblood responded the City had placed
annexation on hold and reported he was amazed to hear the City
Council was not working toward preparing a plan to present to the
voters in October.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 651
Councilmember Hicks reported on the need to present a plan
that would reflect a savings through a consolidated government and
stated if the plan shows no significant savings he would not vote
to place this item on the ballot in October.
Chairman Greer responded this was why he was in favor of the
McComas Bill. He reported on February 28, 1995, the Consolidation
Study Commission voted unanimously to develop a plan for
consolidation and to move forward with presenting the plan to the
voters in October. He expressed concern for preparing a plan with
half of the members of the Consolidation Study Commission coming
back later feeling the plan had not saved enough money, or the
number of employees had not been sufficiently reduced. He stressed
the importance of allowing the citizens to vote on consolidation
before the City proceeds with its annexation plan.
Mayor Pro-tern Moore expressed
Councilmembers not working toward
meetings had been held by some
annexation after the Consolidation
concern for
the same goal
Councilmembers
Study Commission
many of the
and reported
lobbying for
was formed.
Mayor Betz commented on this type of discussion not being
constructive and asked Commissioner Barone if a resolution of
support was on the agenda for the meeting to be held by the Board
of County Commissioners this evening?
Commissioner Barone responded a resolution of support for the
McComas Bill would be presented at the meeting that evening. She
explained the bill would resolve many issues, particularly the
voting inequity problem on the Consolidation Study Commission with
appointment of six elected officials from the City, five elected
officials from the Board of County Commissioners with one member
appointed by the Board, and one representative from each of the
three beach communities.
Councilmember Rivenbark, agaln, expressed concern for the
Commissioners considering the McComas Bill.
REPORT FROM THE CHARTER COMMITTEE
Chairman Greer reported the Charter Committee by a majority
vote had decided on the following issues:
Name of Government: The Wilmington-New Hanover Consolidated
Government.
Size of Government: Seven or nine members, including a Mayor.
System of Government: Council/Manager government.
Partisan vs. Nonpartisan Elections: Partisan
Method of Elections: Primaries, with all members elected at-large.
Districts with a residency requirement may be considered in the
future.
Terms of Office: Four-year terms with staggered terms after the
transi tion period is completed. Transi tion options are to be
considered by the Study Commission.
Presiding Officer: Elected at-large for a four-year term.
Part-Time vs. Full-Time Elected Officials: The Commissioners would
be part-time elected officials.
Procedure for Filling Vacancies: The Governing Body would appoint
the replacement from a member of the political party represented by
the vacating member. The appointee would serve until the next
election, at which time a replacement would be chosen by the
electorate to complete the remaining two years, if applicable.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 652
Beach Towns: A letter was received from the Wrightsville Beach
Board of Aldermen declining the offer to become a part of the
consolidated government. No response has been received from the
Town of Carolina Beach or the Town of Kure Beach.
Service Districts: The entire County would be taxed for county-
wide services such as education, health, etc.; however, one service
district would be created excluding the corporate boundaries of the
beach municipalities for services not provided county-wide.
Appointment of Administrative Officials: The governing body would
appoint the Manager, Attorney, Clerk, and Fire Chief. County
posi tions for which appointments are controlled by the N. C.
General Statutes would remain the same, including the DSS Director,
Heal th Director, Tax Supervisor, Tax Collector, and Elections
Director.
Procedure for Modifying the Form of Government: The Committee
recommends use of the current City procedure because it will allow
for greater flexibility. Minor changes could be accomplished by
the Board and substantive changes could be decided by a referendum,
petitioned by the voters.
Planning and Zoning: The Charter Committee will yield to the
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Committee.
Personnel: The Charter Committee will yield to the recommendations
of the Administration/Personnel Committee.
Commissioner Barone expressed concern for the procedure
outlined to fill a vacancy on the Consolidated Board and
recommended filling the vacancy with the candidate who had received
the next highest number of votes. She explained that a candidate
had gone through the election process; had been questioned by the
people on important issues; and had expended money to run for
election; therefore, this person should be appointed to fill the
vacant seat.
After discussion among the members of the Charter Committee,
it was concluded the procedure outlined for filling a vacancy on
the Consolidated Board was approved by a majority vote of the
members.
Councilmember Padgett reported it was her understanding that
the Fire Chief would be appointed by the Manager, not the
consolidated government. Also, it was concluded that the Charter
Committee would yield to the recommendation of the Public Safety
Committee as to how the Chief Law Enforcement Officer would be
appointed.
After discussion, it was concluded there was an error in the
minutes of the last Charter Committee meeting, and the "Fire Chief"
was to be appointed by the Manager.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore commented on the appointment of
administrative personnel and recommended appointing the Manager,
Attorney, and Clerk with the corresponding Manager, Attorney, and
Clerk becoming assistants for at least one year. She requested
that this procedure be added to the report by the Charter
Committee.
Councilmember Youngblood expressed concern about two
department heads remaining in the appointed positions from an
expense point of view as well as direction and stated, in his
opinion, this procedure would create confusion.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore reported the workload would be too great
for each appointee. For example, if the City Attorney was
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 653
appointed, he would need the County Attorney to help him understand
the needs of the County during the transition period.
Commissioner Sisson agreed with the Mayor Pro-Tern and reported
both Managers, Attorneys, and Clerks will be needed for their
experience in dealing with the City and County issues. Also, there
will be managerial areas that will be difficult to combine, such as
Civil Codes, Fire Codes, and Planning and Zoning Codes.
Discussion was held on how to address the removal of old
elected officials with newly elected officials during the
transi tion period. Chairman Greer presented three options prepared
by the Charter Committee and requested each member to review the
options and be prepared to discuss them at the next meeting.
Discussion was held on Option 2. Mayor Pro-Tern Moore
reported, in her opinion, this would be an appropriate option.
Chairman Greer explained that under Option 2, the Charter
Committee felt it would be difficult for candidates running for
office to spend money for the election process and find out later
they would be elected for only one year.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore suggested informing all candidates ln
advance that some terms could be for one year.
After a lengthy discussion of the options for electing a new
consolidated board, it was concluded that each member of the
Consolidation Study Commission should submit a preferred option or
written proposal to the Charter Committee on how to elect new
members and remove old members during the transition period. The
Charter Committee would review the recommendations and prepare an
option to be presented to the Consolidation Study Commission at the
next meeting.
Councilmember Youngblood inquired as to whether the Charter
Committee had reviewed any consolidated governments that still had
a municipality within the jurisdiction after the consolidation.
After further discussion, it was the consensus of the Consolidation
Study Commission to request Staff to contact the Jacksonville-
Duvall County consolidated government to find out if Jacksonville
Beach was still a municipality inside the jurisdiction of Duvall
County.
Discussion was held on deciding whether to have seven or nine
members on the Consolidated Board. Councilmember Rivenbark
reported on the time required to serve as a Councilmember and
stated, in his opinion, a nine-member board would be needed to
handle the volume of work and provide for a broader citizen
representation from within the community.
Councilmember Youngblood commented on the number of zoning
cases and reported he felt a nine-member board would be essential
to handle the volume.
Commissioner Sisson commented on planning and zoning issues
and stated hopefully the Planning Commission would be able to
devise a procedure that would not require the Consolidated Board to
hear every insignificant planning issue. Also, more board members
would increase the workload for the Manager, Attorney, and Clerk.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore spoke in favor of a nine-member board
because it would provide for a broader representation from within
the community.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 654
Motion: Mayor Betz MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner Barone for the
Consolidated Board to be composed of seven members. The floor was
opened for discussion.
Councilmember Rivenbark commented on appointing seven members
and asked if more members were needed, how difficult would it be to
increase the number of members to nine?
Chairman Greer responded the procedure for modifying the form
of government recommended by the Charter Committee would allow for
minor changes by the consolidated board.
Substitute Motion: Mayor Pro-Tern Moore MADE A SUBSTITUTE MOTION,
SECONDED by Councilmember Padgett to appoint a nine-member board
with the condition that the charter would be changed if this number
was not satisfactory. The floor was opened for discussion.
Chairman Greer stressed the importance of resolving the voting
inequity issue before taking a vote by the Consolidation Study
Commission and recommended using a 1.4 count for each
Commissioner's vote rounded off to the nearest figure.
Commissioner Barone advised that a suggestion had been
received from a member of the general public to require a 75% vote
from the members of Consolidation Study Commission before an item
was approved.
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore reported the 1.4 count per Commissioner
rounded off to the nearest number would be satisfactory with her.
Councilmember Youngblood asked what would be wrong with
requiring a majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners and
a majority vote by the City Council which would represent the 50/50
partnership.
Councilmember Causey reported the 1.4 count is no different
than each governing body voting separately on an issue. He
recommended allowing each governing body to vote separately and
work on an issue until it was resolved.
Substitute Motion: Commissioner Sisson MOVED, SECONDED by
Commissioner Caster to adopt a procedure that would allow a
weighted vote of 1.4% for each County Commissioner contingent upon
the total vote being rounded off according to standard mathematical
procedures with each City Councilmember having one vote. Upon
vote, the MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye: Commissioner Barone
Commissioner Caster
Commissioner Sisson
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Greer
Mayor Betz
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore
Councilmember Padgett
Voting Nay: Councilmember Causey
Councilmember Hicks
Councilmember Rivenbark
Councilmember Youngblood
Chairman Greer called for a vote on the Substitute Motion by
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore to appoint a nine-member board for the original
consolidated board contingent upon the charter being changed to
reduce this number if not satisfactory.
Commissioner Sisson requested an explanation as to why the
Mayor Pro-Tern felt the number should be nine.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 655
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore responded the appointment of nine members
would provide for a better representation throughout the community
and also reduce the responsibilities of each elected official.
Commissioner Caster stated, in his opinion, increasing the
number of members to nine would not reduce the responsibilities of
each board member. He recommended a seven-member board with
prioritization of the number of boards and committees to which the
elected officials could be appointed.
Councilmember Hicks reported the thought process behind seven
members was to require more delegation and use of staff; however,
he agreed with Mayor Pro-Tern Moore in that nine members would
provide a more equitable representation throughout the County.
Councilmember Padgett spoke in favor of a nine-member board
feeling the responsibilities could be more evenly spread among the
members as well as provide for a broader representation throughout
the community.
Councilmember Causey spoke in favor of a nine-member board to
lessen the workload for each member as well as enable the board to
be in a better position to deal with districts in the future.
Councilmember Youngblood spoke in favor of a nine-member board
because of the increased workload that would be placed on each
member under a consolidated government.
Chairman Greer called for a vote on the SUBSTITUTE MOTION to
appoint an original board of nine members with the condition that
the charter would be changed if the number was not satisfactory.
Upon vote, the MOTION RECEIVED A TIE VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye: Mayor Pro Tern Moore
Councilmember Causey
Councilmember Hicks
Councilmember Padgett
Councilmember Youngblood
Councilmember Rivenbark
Commissioner Sisson
(Vote Count: 7.4 rounded off to 7.0)
Voting Nay: Chairman Greer
Commissioner Caster
Commissioner Barone
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Mayor Betz
(Vote Count: 6.6 rounded off to 7.0)
Discussion was held on the Charter Committee's recommendation
for holding partisan elections. Commissioner Sisson objected to
partisan elections, particularly on the local level, and expressed
concern for the politics as well as the cost involved to a
candidate when campaigning through a primary and general election.
He stressed the importance of keeping the cost to a minimum so
average citizens could run for office.
Mayor Pro Tern Moore spoke in favor of non-partisan elections
wi th emphasis being placed on the need to remove some of the
politics out of government on the local level.
Chairman Greer requested direction from the Consolidation
Study Committee and reported this issue could be voted on today by
the group, or the matter could be further discussed by the Charter
Committee.
Commissioner Barone suggested allowing the Charter Committee
to continue to review the issue with a recommendation being
presented to the Consolidation Study Commission for final approval.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 656
After discussion of partisan elections being a majority vote
on the Charter Committee, it was decided to vote on the issue.
Mayor Betz inquired as to whether the Charlotte/Mecklenburg
consolidation effort had decided on partisan versus non-partisan
elections. Ci ty Attorney, Tom Pollard, responded the
recommendation of the Charlotte/Mecklenburg Consolidation Study
Committee was for partisan elections.
Commissioner Sisson inquired as to whether a non-partisan
recommendation would comply to the N. C. General Statutes?
County Attorney Copley responded that special legislation
would be required.
Commissioner Sisson recommended that Staff
legal aspects of non-partisan elections for
government.
investigate the
a consolidated
Mayor Pro-Tern Moore recommended calling for a vote on the
issue to determine the desire of the group. She reminded everyone
that the Wilmington/New Hanover Consolidated Government would be
the first government of its type in the State and reported the
General Assembly would render a final decision; however, by voting
on the issue, the legislators would know the desire of the elected
officials.
Councilmember Hicks recommended that Staff contact the N. C.
League of Municipalities for an opinion on non-partisan elections.
City Attorney Pollard reported the
included non-partisan elections with
method of election as presently being
Special legislation would be required
Assembly.
last consolidation charter
the election and run-off
used by the City Council.
if approved by the General
Commissioner Barone commented on the need to be realistic and
stated when asking the local legislators to support or oppose bills
that impact local governments, she felt a partisan board would
receive more support from the local delegation. She commented on
serving as a Councilmember and County Commissioner and reported on
the differences in the services provided by the County, such as
schools, public health, social services, etc. She stated the local
legislators had been a valuable asset in supporting or opposing
bills that would greatly impact County funding for these programs
which are mandated by the N. C. General Statutes.
Councilmember Rivenbark disagreed and stated, in his opinion,
a partisan or non-partisan board would not make a difference. He
expressed concern for the politics involved with partisan boards
and reported a non-partisan board would remove some of the politics
and at the same time provide a more equitable form of government.
Chairman Greer reported he was for partisan elections.
Motion: After
elections on the
by Councilmember
vote, THE MOTION
discussion of the need to have non-partisan
local level, Mayor Pro-Tern Moore MOVED, SECONDED
Rivenbark to hold non-partisan elections. Upon
RECEIVED A TIE VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye: Mayor Betz
Mayor Pro Tern Moore
Councilmember Hicks
Councilmember Rivenbark
Councilmember Padgett
Councilmember Causey
Commissioner Sisson
(Vote Count: 7.4 rounded off to 7.0)
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 657
Voting Nay: Councilmember Youngblood
Commissioner Barone
Commissioner Caster
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Greer
(Vote Count: 6.6 rounded off to 7.0)
Consensus: After further discussion, it was the consensus of the
Consolidation Study Commission to accept the Charter Committee's
report with the exception of Item 4, partisan versus non-partisan
elections, which will be discussed at the next meeting.
CHARTER COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 17, 1995
The members of the Charter Committee scheduled the next
meeting for Wednesday, May 17, 1995, at 8:00 A.M. in the Assembly
Room of the New Hanover County Administration Building, 320
Chestnut Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
REPORT FROM THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE
Mayor Betz presented the following preliminary recommendations
of the Utilities Committee:
(1) The form of consolidation should be a Water and Sewer
Department. Options for drainage/stormwater management are
still under study.
(2) The budgets and functions of the County District and City
Water and Sewer can be combined with the following results:
Sales Tax revenue transfers can be phased out over three
years as follows: 1996/97 - $3.666 million; 1997/98 -
$2.566 million; 1998/99 - $1.347 million; and 1999/00 -
$0.
An increase in user rates for 1996/97 at 10%; 1997/98 at
9.75%; and 1998/99 at 9.75%.
A facility impact fee of $736 per house for water and
also for sewer.
(3) The Committee recommends that the Consolidated Government
initially assume the operation of the District's system
through an interlocal agreement. The District would remain in
statutory existence for this purpose only.
A lengthy discussion was held on the County's current impact
fee of $375. Councilmember Padgett inquired as to whether the $375
was the entire cost of getting sewer to a house other than paying
for a plumber?
Assistant County Manager, Dave Weaver, responded the $375 was
a facility fee placed in an escrow account for future expansion of
the County's sewer system. He noted the County did not have an
impact fee for the transportation of sewer.
Councilmember Padgett asked if households were assessed when
the County extended sewer into a neighborhood?
Assistant County Manager Weaver responded when the bond
referendum was held several years ago, bond proceeds were to be
used to pay for the transportation of sewer as well as for
construction of trunk lines. The debt service for the bond issue
had traditionally been paid from revenues generated by the sales
tax.
Councilmember Padgett commented on the fact that all citizens
were paying for the sewer expansion and inquired as to the cost
involved to the individual homeowner?
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION, MAY 1, 1995
BOOK 24
PAGE 658
County Manager O'Neal reported the County was not using the
property tax to pay for water and sewer services. The 1/2 cent
sales tax was being used for sewer construction, which was approved
and designated for this purpose by the General Assembly several
years ago.
Councilmember Youngblood inquired as to whether the rate
increases projected would provide for extension of service into the
new consolidated government.
City Manager Gornto reported the projected rate increases
reflect the removal of the sales tax subsidy on the County Sewer
System and a modest extension of service. In response to the
question asked by Councilmember Youngblood, the cost figures being
reviewed by the City for extension of water and sewer service into
the entire annexation study area are not comparable to the figures
presented. Using these figures, the City's $71 million fund
balance and the Water & Sewer District's $7 million fund balance
would be used. If the utilities were not consolidated, residents
of the City would not receive a 10% increase.
Commissioner Barone reported the Utilities Committee was aware
that certain inequities would have to be worked out.
Commissioner Sisson explained that a sewer system without
water cannot be compared to a sewer system with water. Most sewer
systems barely break even. The majority of municipalities provide
both water and sewer with the sewer being supported by the water
fee.
Mayor Betz pointed out that not only would cash reserves be
blended, but the City's debt of $61.4 million with the County's
water and sewer debt of $34.6 million would be blended providing a
2-1 ratio for debt service.
CONSOLIDATION STUDY COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR MAY 22, 1995
It was the consensus of the group to schedule a Consolidation
Study Commission meeting at the Coast Line Convention Center on
Monday, May 22, 1995, at 8:00 A.M.
Councilmember Causey reported before adjourning the meeting he
would like to report the minutes of the Wilmington City Council
reflect that Council addressed annexation as an orderly plan for
consideration contingent upon a vote on consolidation. He stressed
the importance of everyone understanding that the City will proceed
with its annexation plan if the voters oppose consolidation.
Councilmember Rivenbark reported the residents of the County
did not request another study of consolidation until the City
announced it would proceed with its orderly plan for annexation,
which was slowed down in 1987. In his opinion, if the plan had
been carried out as proposed and not slowed down by the City, the
two governments would not be discussing consolidation.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Greer expressed appreciation to the elected officials
for their comments and adjourned the meeting at 10:50 A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lucie F. Harrell
Clerk to the Board