1991-04-01 Regular Meeting
~
40"9
0,>
'"
"'1
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, APRIL 1, 1991
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met in Regular
Session on Monday, April 1, 1991, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the
Assembly Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North
Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
I
.
Members present were:
Robert G. Greer; William H.
Jr.; Chairman Fred Retchin;
Attorney, Robert W. Pope;
Harrell.
Commissioners Jonathan Barfield, Sr.;
Sutton; Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews,
County Manager, Allen O'Neal; County
and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F.
Chairman Retchin called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Health Director, Robert S. Parker, gave the invocation.
Chairman Retchin led the audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to present an item not listed on the Regular Agenda or
comment on an item listed on the Consent Agenda. No items or
comments were presented.
.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Greer requested removal of Consent Agenda #9
and recommended that this item be placed on the May 6, 1991,
agenda in order to further discuss the Certificate of Resolutions
and Incumbency form for installment purchases with the County
Manager and Finance Officer.
Motion: After discussion, Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED, SECONDED
by Commissioner Greer to approve the Consent Agenda with removal
of Item #9 as requested by Commissioner Greer. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
CONSENT AGENDA
Acceptance of Change Order Report #19 for Period Ending March 21,
1991
The Commissioners accepted Change Order Report #19 for the
period ending March 21, 1991, as presented by the Deputy County
Manager.
A copy of the report is hereby incorporated as a part of the
minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 3.
Approval of Contract 191-0087 with C&G Plumbing Company for
Installation of Plumbing for Rest Rooms and the Concession Stand
at MYrtle Grove Middle School Ball Fields
The following proposals were received for installation of
plumbing for rest rooms and the Concession Stand at Myrtle Grove
Middle School Ball Fields:
.
C&G Plumbing Company
Hayward's Plumbing Company
Kelly Plumbing Company, Inc.
$12,452
$16,500
$12,638
The Commissioners awarded the low bid to C&G Plumbing
Company as recommended by Staff and authorized the Chairman to
execute the necessary contract documents.
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Disposal of Surplus
Equipment and Vehicles Through a County Auction
The Commissioners adopted a resolution designating the
Finance Director, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 160A-270, as
the representative authorized to dispose of surplus equipment and
~
(
4tO
-"
.~
vehicles through a County Auction to be held on April 20, 1991,
at 10:00 A.M.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 3.
Rejection of Bid #91-0091 for Purchase of 1991 Suburban ALS
Non-Transport Vehicle - Emergency Medical Services Department
The Commissioners rejected the bids received on March 19,
1991, for purchase of a 1991 Suburban ALS non-transport vehicle
as recommended by the Purchasing Officer. One proposal was ()
incomplete and the other bid received from Professional Vehicles '",-
had deviations from the technical specifications and was higher
than the amount budgeted for the purchase.
Adoption of Resolution Awarding Bid (Contract #91-0047) to
Newbold's Carolina BBQ & Seafood, Inc. for Home Delivered Meals -
Department of Aging
The Commissioners adopted a resolution awarding the
congregate home delivered meals contract to the lowest
responsible bidder, Newbold's Carolina BBQ Seafood, Inc. of
Richlands, North Carolina, at a cost of $2.60 per meal for
congregate and home delivered meals. Only one bid was received.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 3.
Approval of Budget Amendment #91-0204 to Allocate Additional
State Funding - community Based Alternatives
The Commissioners approved the following Budget Amendment:
91-0204 outside
Alternatives
Agencies/Human
Services/Community
Based
Debit
Credit
outside Aqencies/Human Services
Community Based Alternatives Grants
CBA Grants
n
\-. ,j
$6,938
outside Aqencies/Human Services
Community Based Alternatives Aqencies
Non-Secure Detention
$6,938
Purpose: To allocate additional State funding to the Non-Secure
Detention program. No County funds are required.
The program's obj ecti ve is to reduce the number of chi ldren
assigned to the Juvenile Services Center while waiting for their
court trial.
Approval of Budget Amendment #91-0207 to Budget Increased
Revenues and Expenditures in Home Health
The Commissioners approved the following Budget Amendment:
91-0207 Health Department/Home Health
Debit
Credit
Health Department/Home Health
Home Health Fees - Medicare
Home Health Fees - Medicaid
$46,500
$15,500
n
\ /'
Contracted Services
Postage Expense
Departmental Supplies
Dues & Subscriptions
Employee Reimbursements
$26,000
$ 1,800
$25,000
$ 2,200
$ 7,000
Purpose: To budget for increased revenues and expenditures in
Home Health due to increased visits. No County funds are
required.
,
I
~
,.,
4 l\~t1.,.~ ., ~
Approval of Budget Amendment #91-0210 for Establishment of Budget
for New Hanover County Organized Crime Task Force Grant
The Commissioners accepted a federal grant for the
establishment of the New Hanover County Organized Crime Task
Force and approved the following Budget Amendment for budgeting
and establishing three grant positions, two (2) Deputy Sheriffs
and one (1) Administrative Assistant:
.
-91-0210 Sheriff's Department/Crime Task Force
Debit
Credit
Sheriff's Department Crime Task Force
contribution from the city
Federal Grant
$ 20,000
$120,000
Sheriff's Department/Administration
Salaries & Wages
$ 20,000
Salaries & Wages
FICA
Retirement
Medical Insurance
Departmental Supplies
Capital Outlay - Equipment
Motor Vehicles Purchases
Training & Travel
$23,600
$ 1,805
$ 1,950
$ 1,445
$ 5,000
$77,700
$34,500
$14,000
Purpose: To establish a budget for the New Hanover County
Organized Crime Task Force Grant. The grant will use a
multi-jurisdictional task force to stop the flow of drugs into
the County. The unit will consists of two deputy sheriffs, two
City police officers, two SBI agents, one State special
prosecutor, one highway patrolman, and one administrative
assistant.
.
The grant requires a $20,000 local match from both the City
of Wilmington and New Hanover County. The County's match is
available in the Sheriff's Department FY 1990-91 Budget. If the
grant is successful this year, it will be continued through June
30, 1992.
RECOGNITION OF DR. MICHAEL E. GOINS FOR BEING SELECTED AS THE
RECIPIENT OF THE WILMINGTON JAYCEES "1990 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE
AWARD"
Chairman Retchin, on behalf of the Board, congratulated Dr.
Michael E. Goins for being selected as the recipient of the
Wilmington Jaycees "1990 Distinguished Service Award". He
requested a round of applause for Dr. Goins and expressed
appreciation to him for his outstanding work as a member of the
New Hanover County Board of Health.
.
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
IN RECOGNITION OF RECEIVING THE ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
BOARDS OF HEALTH "1991 OUTSTANDING LOCAL BOARD OF HEALTH AWARD"
Chairman Retchin, on behalf of the Board, presented a plaque
to the members of the Board of Health in recognition of being
selected as the recipient for the Association of North Carolina
Boards of Health "1991 Outstanding Local Board of Health Award."
He expressed appreciation to each member for their outstanding
service on the Board of Health and stated our county is most
fortunate to have citizens so willing to give of their time and
energy for the promotion of public health in New Hanover County.
OATH OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED TO NEW DEPUTY CLERK
Chairman Retchin introduced the new Deputy Clerk, Teresa R.
Elmore, and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F. Harrell, administered
the Oath of Office.
Chairman Retchin, on behalf of the Board, welcomed Ms.
Elmore and wished her success in her new position.
I:
-~
/./0'
i~r?J~ '
~t ',,:
,I
(
I
I
,
i,
I
,J
APPROVAL OF FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE COAST LINE CONVENTION CENTER
Chairman Retchin commented on the funding request and stated
the Wilmington City Council has approved funding in the amount of
$12,500 for marketing and has requested the County to match this
amount.
Commissioner Barfield expressed concern for the budget
crisis on the state level which has led to cutbacks in County
Departments and opposed approving funding for an outside agency
at this time. He requested the County Manager to comment on the
present condition of the County's contingencies account and the \0'
impact of approving the funding request. ~_
County Manager 0' Neal stated the present balance of the
general fund contingency is $29,589, and staff has requested
department heads to reduce their current budgets. He expressed
appreciation to the department heads for cooperating with staff
in reducing their current operating budgets and stated training
requests, travel requests, and the purchase of supplies have been
denied for the remainder of the year due to the predicted
shortfall.
Ms. Jo Ann Fogler, President of the
Center, stated the funds will be earmarked
only and emphasized the fact that dollars
be returned to the county seven times.
needed to attend trade shows, advertise
print brochures to increase the non-local
business.
Coast Line Convention
for marketing purposes
spent in tourism will
Additional funds are
in trade magazines and
portion of the Center's
Chairman Retchin inquired as to whether funds are needed
during the current fiscal year or if they can be allocated for FY
1991-92?
Ms. Fogler commented on the advance bookings of conventions 0
and stated additional funds are needed as soon as possible to
promote the non-local convention business for 1992-93.
Vice-Chairman Mathews inquired as to the amount of
advertising and promotion of the Center by the Convention and
Visitors Bureau (CBV)?
Ms. Fogler stated the CBV performs destination advertising,
but cannot focus on one particular group.
A lengthy discussion was held on the current shortage of
county funds. Commissioner Greer commented on the monies now
being allocated by the City and County for the Coast Line
Convention Center and inquired as to what will happen to this
facility as these funds decrease? Ms. Fogler stated hopefully by
developing a marketing program, the Center will become
self-sustaining within the five-year funding plan.
commissioner Barfield inquired as to why local businesses do
not contribute to the Center and expressed concern for asking the
taxpayers to support the facility.
Motion: After a lengthy discussion of the need to support the
Coast Line Convention Center and match the City's funding
allocation, Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman 0
Mathews to approve additional funding earmarked for marketing
purposes only in the amount of $6,250 during the current fiscal
year and to budget an allocation of $6,250 in FY 1991-92. The
floor was opened for discussion.
,
\~
Commissioner Greer strongly opposed asking County employees
to cut back in their budgets by denying them travel requests and
training opportunities due to the shortfall of funds, and then as
a Board, provide additional funds to an outside agency.
commissioner Barfield stated he is not opposed to supporting
the Convention Center; however, he is concerned about the present
shortfall in the County's budget and emphasized the importance of
funding County needs before providing funds to an outside agency.
,.,
415
>\1
Mr. Leo Bednarczyk, a member of the Board of Directors of
the Coast Line Convention Center, commented on the need to book
conventions and the lack of funds for marketing. He emphasized
the importance of tourism dollars to the local economy.
After further discussion, Chairman Retchin called for a vote
on the MOTION to approve additional funding to be utilized for
"marketing purposes only" in the amount of $6,250 for FY 1990-91
and to budget $6,250 for FY 1991-92. Upon vote, the MOTION
CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
.
Voting Aye: Commissioner Sutton
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Retchin
Voting Nay: Commissioner Barfield
Commissioner Greer
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS FOR REFUSE FIRED STEAM GENERATION
FACILITY EXPANSION
County Manager O'Neal requested consideration of the
following change orders for the steam plant expansion:
1. Change Order No. 89-0111-04 with Sam English, Inc.
For Boiler Modifications of Units 1 & 2
Amount: $126,976.04 (increase)
2. Change Order No. 90-0007-03 with Clancy & Theys
For site Work, Foundations and Structures #2
Amount: $48,216.00 (increase)
.
3. Change Order No. 90-0013-01 with Tencarva Machinery
Company
Deletion of Two Boiler Feed Pumps
Deletion of Auto Recirculating Valves
Amount: $58,914.00 (decrease)
4. Change Order No. 89-0006-04 with Volund USA, Ltd.
For spare parts for new Volund boiler.
Amount: $59,972.00 (increase)
5. Change Order No. 90-0006-01 with Tennesco, Inc.
For additions and modifications to switchgear and
controls.
Amount: $24,954.19 (increase)
6. Change Order No. 90-0010-02 with Blue Ridge Mechanical
Contractors, Inc.
For additional material and services required for the
proper and timely completion of the project.
Amount: $20,361.00 (increase)
Chairman Retchin requested an explanation of Change Order #1
and inquired as to the cost of $126,976.04 for retubing of two
(2) economizers and asked what the cost would have been for
replacement of the economizers?
.
Director of Environmental Management, Ray Church, stated he
is not sure of the cost for replacement of the economizers;
however, with replacement of the entire units, each tube must be
field directed instead of purchasing an entire unit which is time
consuming and costly.
Chairman Retchin requested an explanation of the Change
Order #2 and inquired as to why the proposal from MarKraft
Cabinets, Inc. did not include the cabinet hardware? Director
Church stated he would check into this matter and report back to
the Board.
Chairman Retchin commented on Change Order #3, a reduction
of $58,914.00, and stated since Tencarva Machinery Company cannot
supply the boiler feed pumps, from whom will they be purchased
and at what cost? Director Church stated the reduction figure is
~
(414
~
'"
t
the bid price offered by Tencarva; however, he does not know the
exact cost of the pumps which are being purchased from KSB and
will be glad to check with the consulting engineer. After
further discussion, Chairman Retchin requested Director Church to
inform Dr. stanton Peters, the Consulting Engineer, that when
purchasing these pumps, they should not exceed the figure of
$58,914.00 as offered by Tencarva.
Chairman Retchin commented on Change Order #4 and the letter
to Dr. stanton M. Peters from Volund USA Ltd. dated February 15,
1991, and inquired as to whether the County is being asked to 0
replace parts that fail during the testing period? Director ...
Church stated he was sure Volund would not make such a request
since the parts are under warranty; however, he would check into
the matter. Commissioner sutton stated the request by Volund
could be construed to provide for spare parts on the shelf, since
they would be difficult to purchase.
Motion: After further discussion, Chairman Retchin MOVED,
SECONDED by Commissioner Sutton to approve the change orders
presented contingent upon the following conditions:
-The Tencarva Change Order includes sufficient funding
for replacement of the pumps in the original contract.
-The Volund Change Order will not require the County to
provide any parts that may fail during the start-up
testing period.
-Subject to finalizing of the change orders by the Legal
Department.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE TWO LOTS ON THE O.
NORTH SIDE OF WRIGHTSVILLE AVENUE EAST OF CAPE FEAR HOSPITAL TO
O-I (CD) OFFICE-INSTITUTION CONDITIONAL USE FOR A DRIVEWAY AND
OFF-STREET PARKING FROM R-15 RESIDENTIAL (Z-430)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Hayes stated this item was first presented
to the Planning Commission on February 7, 1991. Due to the
uncertainty associated with general use rezoning, the Planning
Commission asked the applicant -to refile for a conditional use
district feeling that conditional use was more appropriate
because this process requires a companion site plan which details
how the land would be developed; thereby, allowing the Commission
to better gauge the impacts on surrounding land uses. The
Planning commission voted unanimously to rezone the property to a
conditional use district incorporating the following conditions
into the site plan:
1. Limiting the use of the new driveway after hours to
emergency traffic only.
2. Providing vegetative screening for the smith property
(Parcel F on the map) to reduce the effects of head-
lights from traffic exiting the site.
3. Consulting with property owner McNeil (Parcel H on the
map) to determine whether a masonry wall or wood fen-
cing will be used for screening between his property
and the hospital site.
()
4. Limiting lighting along the new drive and parking area
to "down lighting" not to exceed 15 feet in height.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposed
rezoning request. The following person commented:
,
,
~
.
.
.
'f;~ :~~ \'i<:'
",
"
415
J.~.f. '~;ir~:~" '1'\'.P~~
Attorney William L. Hill II, representing Cape Fear Memorial
Hospital, stated the conditions listed are acceptable to the
hospital, and the proposed use will better facilitate traffic in
the area.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: After discussion, commissioner Barfield MOVED, SECONDED
by Commissioner Sutton to approve rezoning the two lots on the
north side of Wrightsville Avenue east of Cape Fear Hospital to
0-1 (CD) Office-Institution Conditional Use for a driveway and
off-street parking from R-15 Residential to include incorporation
of the conditions recommended by the Planning commission. Upon
vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of "AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF ZONING AREA NO. 9B OF NEW HANOVER
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ADOPTED JULY 1, 1972" is hereby
incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in Zoning
Book II, section 9B, Page 71.
Motion: After further discussion, Chairman Retchin MOVED,
SECONDED by Vice-Chairman Mathews to grant a Special Use Permit
to Cape Fear Memorial Hospital to use the property located on
Wrightsville Avenue as a driveway access for emergency vehicles
servicing the hospital and off-street parking based upon the
findings of fact satisfying the four general requirements and
contingent upon inclusion of the conditions presented by the
Planning commission. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the Special Use Permit is hereby incorporated as a
part of the minutes and is contained in SUP Book I, Page 46.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) ACRES
ON THE EAST SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 421 SOUTH OF GOLDEN ROAD TO B-2
BUSINESS FROM R-15 RESIDENTIAL (Z-431)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning Commission
considered this rezoning request focusing on the definition of
commercial nodes and what criteria should be used to define the
outer limits of those nodes. The Land Use Plan supports
commercial development along major thoroughfares at major
intersections; however, 1:7he Planning commission was concerned
that the U. S. Highway 421 and Golden Road intersection might not
meet that definition. The Planning Staff pointed out that Golden
Road was one of only three road connections south of Monkey
Junction that provides access from U. S. Highway 421 to the
Masonboro Sound/Myrtle Grove Sound Area. Also, the nearby
private airfield and similar zoning in close proximity to the
site makes commercial zoning more appealing. After discussion,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed B-2
zoning.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning
request. The following person commented:
Attorney Kenneth Shanklin, representing the petitioner,
stated the proposed rezoning does comply to the Wilmington/New
Hanover County Land Use Plan and is in harmony with surrounding
properties; therefore, he respectfully requests approval of the
proposed B-2 rezoning.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: Commissioner Barfield MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Greer to approve the B-2 rezoning request as recommended by the
Planning commission and Planning Staff. Upon vote, the MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of "AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF ZONING AREA NO. 4 OF NEW HANOVER
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, ADOPTED APRIL 7, 1971," is hereby
,~
(416,
I
i.
I
I
incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in Zoning
Book I, section 4, Page 32.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING APPROXIMATELY EIGHTEEN (18)
ACRES EAST OF CORNING TO 1-1 INDUSTRIAL FROM R-15 RESIDENTIAL
(Z-432)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning Commission
determined that the proposed expansion would not be detrimental
to surrounding residential uses provided site development was in 0
compliance with existing setback and buffering requirements. \'
Also, the Planning commission felt that the location of an
electrical substation on this site could be harmful if not placed
wi thin a reasonable distance from nearby residences. Corning
representatives agreed to meet with Carolina Power & Light
Company to determine a location for the substation that would be
the least harmful to surrounding residential properties.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposed
rezoning request. The following person commented:
Mr. Bob Brown, Plant Manager of corning, commented on the
current expansion of the plant and the number of jobs that will
be provided to the community, and stated the setback requirements
and wetlands do protect the surrounding residences.
Vice-Chairman Mathews inquired as to whether Corning and
Carolina Power & Light Company have worked out a satisfactory
location for the electrical substation?
Mr. Brown stated after discussion with Carolina Power &
Light Company, the proposed substation is located as far away
from residential neighbors as possible and that heavy power lines
will cross the Corning Parking lot. Also, there is no scientific 00
evidence that living near an electrical substation and high power ~
lines will pose an environmental risk to surrounding residences.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: Commissioner Greer commented on the economical
investment made by Corning to the community and MOVED, SECONDED
by Vice-Chairman Mathews to approve rezoning approximately
eighteen (18) acres east of Corning to 1-1 Industrial from R-15
Residential. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of "AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF NEW
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF ZONING AREA NO. 9A OF NEW
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, ADOPTED JULY 1, 1972" is
incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in
Book II, Section 9-A, Page 33.
HANOVER
HANOVER
hereby
Zoning
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING .72 OF AN ACRE ON THE EAST
SIDE OF NORTH KERR AVENUE SOUTH OF GORDON ROAD TO A-I (CD)
AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONAL USE FOR A WOODWORKING SHOP FROM AR
AIRPORT RESIDENTIAL (Z-433)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning Commission 0
generally supported the petition, primarily because they were
able to ascertain through site plan review how the property would .
be used. The Planning Commission noted that the pre-existing
non-residential structure on the property made it difficult to
use the site for residential purposes and concluded that the
proposed woodworking use would pose a threat to nearby
residential uses. There is no documented evidence to suggest the
site in its current operation negatively affects surrounding
i~
I.:'
t'p
,.,
417
~~'1 "...,~'" ~ r :.
'.J- '.,; ~
residences. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
conditional us~ district with the following conditions:
1. outside storage except for the display of products
be screened and fenced from view.
2. Any signage not affixed to the existing building be
limited to ground signs.
.
3. Bufferyard requirements of section 67 of the Zoning
Ordinance be applied.
Chairman Retchin asked if the petitioner would like to
speak. The following person commented:
Mr. George Miars, the petitioner, stated the building is
used only as a woodworking shop and that adjoining property
owners do not object to the proposed rezoning; therefore, he
respectfully requests approval of the Airport Industrial
Conditional Use District.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone present would like to speak
in opposition to the proposed Airport Industrial Conditional Use
District. The following person commented:
Mr. Carol Spencer, owner of Glenwood Mobile Home Park
adjacent to the property, stated he is not opposed to the
rezoning; however, he would like to recommend the following
conditions be imposed on the use, particularly since fuel tanks
were previously located on this site:
.
1. The noise level is to remain at the current level
or less.
2. Inspection of underground fuel tanks to verify they
are not leaking into the mobile home park water
system.
3. All material and equipment be stored inside of the
building.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: After further discussion, Commissioner Greer MOVED,
SECONDED by Chairman Retchin to approve the rezoning request to
Airport Industrial Conditional Use Woodworking Shop from AR
Airport Residential. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP OF ZONING AREA AIRPORT OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA ADOPTED OCTOBER 4, 1976," is hereby incorporated
as a part of the minutes and is contained in Zoning Book II,
Airport, Page 10.
.
Motion: After further discussion, commissioner Barfield MOVED,
SECONDED by Vice-Chairman Mathews to grant a Special Use Permit
for a Conditional Use Zoning District to use the property located
at 1726 North Kerr Avenue as a Woodworking Shop based upon the
findings of fact meeting the four general requirements,
incorporation of the conditions as recommended by the Planning
Commission, and contingent upon inclusion of the following
conditions as received from the Public Hearing: (1) noise levels
not exceed the levels now generated by the power equipment in the
use; (2) all materials and equipment be stored inside the
buildings; and (3) test wells be provided to determine water
quality adjacent to existing underground storage tanks. Upon
vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of ,the Special Use Permit is hereby incorporated as a
part of the minutes and is contained in sUP Book I, Page 46.
POSTPONEMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 125 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILITARY CUT-OFF
ROAD, NORTH OF LANDFALL, TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FROM R-15 AND
R-20 RESIDENTIAL (S-329)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
~
( ."c'
r 418
\
.----
Planning Director Hayes stated the petitioner is requesting
rezoning to a Planned Development District and presented the
Planned Development District criteria. This property has been
the subject of three (3) rezoning petitions since 1986 with all
petitions being denied by the Planning Commission. After review
of the proposed PD, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 2 to deny
the request due to concern for the reliability of the proposed
on-site drainage system for the protection of Howe Creek and
further traffic congestion along Military Cut-Off Road.
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning staff recommends 0
approval of the project based upon the following provisions: .
1. The integrity of the stormwater management plan must be
maintained to ensure that no adverse impacts are created for
Howe Creek. Much of this site lies in the extreme upper reaches
of the Howe Creek Drainage basin. stormwater from the commercial
area should be retained on site and great precautions should be
taken to prevent discharge of any kind into Howe Creek, which is
classified as an outstanding resource water.
2. Although the maximum amount of commercial development in a PD
District is 30% of the gross acreage, the total commercial area
should be scaled down, perhaps to 25%. A 40 acre commercial site
already adjoins the property to the south (Landfall). The
extreme southern corner of the site will be extremely difficult
to develop because of Special Highway Overlay District setback
demands and the odd shape of the parcel. Also, as documented
there is more than adequate vacant or undeveloped commercially
zoned land throughout the County. Many other shopping areas
located nearby are in various stages of decline. The adjoining
PD District for Landfall was approved with O-I uses. Perhaps an
O-I use with adjustments being made for coordinating access
points at Landfall and this site would lessen the strip
commercial connotation.
o
3. At a minimum, the County should require the developer to
install turning lanes, deceleration lanes, and other road
modifications as necessary to lessen turning movements to and
from the site, and no more than three access points to Military
Cut-Off Road should be permitted. The County's branch library
access should also be linked to one of these median cross-overs.
Planning Director Hayes stated the PD District is designed
to provide for the mixing of various land uses with appropriate
planning controls and should not be used as a method of promoting
commercial development; therefore, the Planning Staff recommends
the that the construction of the project be staged so that the
non-residential ratio of the project neVer exceeds the approved
percentage.
Vice-Chairman Mathews commented on the protection of Howe
Creek and inquired as to how the County can be assured this creek
is protected? Planning Director Hayes stated the County's
Engineer should review the drainage plan, and the Department of
Environmental Management regulations must be met.
Attorney David Barefoot, representing the petitioner,
commented on the PD District being a better plan and stated the
questions to be answered for approval of the project are as O'
follows:
1. Should there be any commercial development?
2. will the developer do a good job in controlling
stormwater run-off?
Attorney Barefoot stated the proposed project does have less
commercial development, and stormwater run-off will be controlled
by on-site treatment and retention ponds. The proposed
development will also be beneficial to the local economy by
~
.
.
.
..,
j 4'19
adding millions of dollars to the tax base as well as widening
4,000 feet of the Military Cut-Off Road to a five-lane highway
which will be paid for by the developer. He requested Mr. sid
Riddick, a Consulting Engineer with McKim and Creed, to discuss
stormwater run-off controls.
Mr. Riddick stated stormwater control has been the critical
issue of the proposed project. He discussed the following items:
1. Stormwater run-off is the result of rainfall which naturally
occurs. Water from the rainfall flows across the land into the
surface waters. Stormwater run-off occurs whether there is or is
not development. The state and county regulations proposed are
an attempt to control the quality of the surface waters by
providing specific control of treatment measures that are
appropriate for the type of development which is allowed to
occur, and the relationship of the development to those surface
waters. In evaluating methods to deal with stormwater run-off on
this property, all state environmental requirements will be met
to protect Howe Creek as an outstanding water resource.
2. By utilizing the guidelines provided by Environmental
Management, the northern portion of the property is over 4,000
feet from Howe Creek. Based on the standards mandated by the
state and county, the appropriate technology to manage stormwater
run-off for this project is through the use of wet retention
ponds which are required to store one (1) inch of rainfall from
all impervious surfaces within the commercial zone, and through
the use of grass line swells that control the rate at which the
water is discharged into Howe Creek. At this time,. no specific
engineering plans have been presented due to not knowing the
amount of commercial property to be approved in the project.
3. Military Cut-Off Road is a part of the County Thoroughfare
Plan and a part of the Outer Loop; therefore, traffic will
increase whether the project is or is not approved. Construction
of approximately one mile of five (5) lanes on this major
corridor will be advantageous to all persons utilizing this road.
Mr. Riddick requested the Board to allow McKim & Creed to
submi t a stormwater drainage plan which at that time can be
judged as to whether all drainage and discharge concerns have
been addressed.
Chairman Retchin a,sked if anyone from the general public
would like to speak ln opposition to the proposed Planned
Development District and requested only two spokesmen in order to
save time and allow the Board to receive public input. The
following persons commented:
Mr. Hardy Parker, a property owner across the street,
expressed concern for the commercial portion of the project and
stated there is no need for additional commercial zoning with the
land already zoned for commercial use. He also expressed concern
for the poor internal drainage of this land with the types of
soils in the area and stated the ponds will not control the
run-off into Howe Creek. He requested the Board to deny the PD
request stating the drainage plan presented is the same as
presented for the proposed B-2 rezoning.
Mr. William C. Howard, Jr., a resident of 4000 Chapra Drive,
requested the Board to deny the petition based upon the proposed
development not being a true PD District. A true PD District
should integrate various housing types and related
non-residential facilities into a harmonious whole to enhance the
overall neighborhood quality of life and reduce dependence on
automobiles; therefore, the Master Land Use Plan should limit
non-residential facilities to those oriented toward neighborhood
uses such as schools, doctors offices, small retail stores, etc.
that are located within walking distance. The proposed project
will have a commercial area of 30% concentrated at one end of the
tract and will be zoned B-2 which is not the type of zoning to
enhance the quality of life in a neighborhood. Mr. Howard stated
this classification is completely incompatible with the PD
~
( 420
!: "
..:'. ....;'.
....
".;..
concept which should feature neighborhood services, and he
requested denial of the request.
Mr. Jack Wiggins, representing the Steering Committee of
Middle Sound Lookout, expressed concern for the proposed
commercial zoning and pollution of Howe Creek stating at this
time it is doubtful that the proposed on-site retention ponds or
traffic plan submitted will be satisfactory.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
dfD11'slcussioln w~s hel? ontthe drainaget Ptrodbletmh~ exper1b'elnced in ~
Lan a . P ann1ng D1rec or Hayes s a e 1S pro em was
created by disturbing too much land at one time and for this
reason, he would recommend developing the project in stages.
Motion made and Withdrawn: After further discussion,
Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED to approve the Planned Development
District with the condition that no commercial development occur
until 50% of the residential development has been completed. The
floor was opened for discussion.
Further discussion was also held on the 30% commercial
development with the recommendation that 2/3 of the commercial
property be zoned business (B-2) and the remaining 1/3 of the
commercial development be zoned 0-1 (Office and Institution).
A lengthy discussion was held on the detention and retention
stormwater run-off and the amount of land to be developed
commercially.
Commissioner Sutton expressed concern
information on the proposed project and
action.
for the
requested
lack of
deferring
Attorney Barefoot requested postponement of action until the ~
Board thoroughly understands the boundaries of the PD request. ~ )
Vice-Chairman Mathews withdrew the motion.
Motion: After discussion of allowing more time to better
understand the proposed PD project and development of a formula
to distribute the amount of 0-1 and B-2 commercial development,
Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman Mathews to
defer action on the Public Hearing until the first meeting in
May. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BREAK
Chairman Retchin recessed the meeting for a break from 8:59
o'clock P.M. to 9:15 o'clock P.M
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
ESTABLISH A MARINE SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION COMPLEX ON THE
EAST SIDE OF MASONBORO LOOP ROAD (S-329)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing and stated the
special use process is a quasi-judicial hearing; therefore, all
persons wishing to speak must be sworn in by the Clerk to the
Board, Lucie F. Harrell.
The following person was sworn in:
Dr. James R. Leutze
()
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning commission
approved the Special Use Permit feeling the use would not
negatively impact on nearby residential uses, and he presented
the following Staff findings:
General Requirement #1: The proposed use will not materially
endanger the public health or safety based upon the following
findings:
I
~
t;~ L
~
>r ~
421
f!<i.5 ,
1. Minimal site clearing is proposed and the proportion of
paving for drives and new buildings to the overall tract acreage
is very low.
2. Water and sewer services
off-site sources. Sewer may
treatment plant if necessary.
are likely to be provided from
be supplemented by an on-site
3. This site has direct access to Masonboro Loop Road.
.
4. This site is located within the Myrtle Grove Volunteer Fire
Department District.
General Reauirement #2: The proposed use meets all required
conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance based upon
the following findings:
1. The proposed Marine Research and Education Facility will be
operated by the University of North Carolina at Wilmington IS
Center for Marine Science Research. Colleges, universities and
related uses are permitted by Special Use Permit in the R-15
Residential District.
2. Approximately 18,125 cumulative square feet of construction
(buildings) is proposed. This would consist of a three-winged
main building (7,500 square feet), an ocean support building
(5,625 square feet) a shellfish sanitation building (2,500 square
feet) and a meteorology building (2,500 square feet).
3. An area of street parking is indicated on the si te plan
around the main building (Building A). The number of spaces is
not specified. No parking areas are shown around buildings C,D,
and E. More detailed parking and landscaping plans will be
needed.
.
General Reauirement #3: The proposed use will not materially
injure the value of adjoining properties based upon the following
findings:
1. Land bordering on the north is vacant. This land is owned by
the N. C. Lutheran Retirement Center. Land to the south is
either vacant or developed at a very low residential density.
Further south is a large tract that is used for residential
purposes and the growth and sale of Christmas trees.
2. Significant residential development is located to the west
across Masonboro Loop Road.
General Reauirement #4: The proposed use will be in harmony with
the area based upon the following findings:
1. The proposed development would consist of approximately
18,000 square feet on fifty acres.
2. The site plan indicates that significant natural area would
remain undisturbed.
Recommended Conditions:
.
1. 0-1 type setbacks should be applied for buildings as
specified in Section 69.11 of the ordinance.
2. Permit only one ground sign not to exceed six feet in
height and 32 square feet in area.
Chairman Retchin asked the petitioner, if he would like to
comment and if he agrees with the finding as presented by the
Planning Staff?
Dr. James R. Leutze, Chancellor of UNC-Wilmington, commented
on the importance of the marine sciences to our area and stated
he concurs with the findings of fact and conditions as presented.
~
/
(
42"..2
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone present would like to speak
in opposition to granting the Special Use Permit. No one
commented.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: Commissioner Barfield MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Sutton to grant the Special Use Permit for the development of a
Marine Research and Education Facility on the east side of
Masonboro Loop Road based upon the evidence and findings of fact
meeting the four genera^l requirements and contingent upon the 0'
conditions as recommended. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED ,
UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the Special Use Permit is hereby incorporated as a
part of the minutes and is contained in SUP Book I, Page 46.
PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY THE SITE PLAN FOR AN EXISTING SPECIAL
USE PERMIT FOR PLANTATION VILLAGE TO ALLOW FOR THE REDESIGN AND
ALLOCATION OF ON-SITE DWELLINGS AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES (S-331)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing and stated the
special use process is a quasi-judicial hearing; therefore,
anyone wishing to speak must be sworn in by the Clerk to the
Board.
The following person was sworn in:
John R. Jefferies
Planning Director Hayes stated the Planning Commission voted
unanimously to approve the proposed modifications to the master
plan for Plantation village, Inc., a nursing and personal care
facility located on Porters Neck Road. The proposed reduction in
density and the addition of open space would be consistent with
the approval of the original Special Use Permit.
Planning Director Hayes presented the following findings of
fact:
o
General Requirement #1: The proposed use will not materially
endanger the public health or safety based upon the following
findings:
1. A special Use Permit was issued to Plantation Village, Inc.
on August 1, 1983 for a "nursing and personal care" facility. To
date, approximately one-half of the overall proj ect has been
completed. This includes the construction of a common building,
which houses a cafeteria, auditorium and residential units.
2. Existing facilities are currently serviced with adequate
water supply and sewage disposal systems.
3. This site is located within the Ogden Volunteer Fire
Department District.
4. Run-off from the site will be disposed of by an underground
piping system. A centrally located lake receives all other
on-site discharges.
General Requirement #2: The proposed use meets all required 0
conditions and specifications of the Zoning Ordinance based upon .
the following findings:
1. Nursing and personal care facilities are permitted by Special
Use in the R-20 District. This site is zoned R-20.
General Requirement #3: The proposed use will not injure the
value of adjoining property based upon the following findings:
1. A Special Use Permit' already exists for a nursing/personal
facility and related uses on this site.
~
1< :~ :- <:;2'
..,
..,..-..1
4~3
i.:{{
2. The proposed revisions to the building projects are generally
consistent with the land use pattern in Phase I, which is already
constructed. other revisions include: (1) the expansion of the
Commons building; (2) the addition of covered carports; and (3)
the elimination of the health care center in favor of a health
care contract with Davis Health Care Center adjacent to the site.
General Requirement #4: The proposed use will be in harmony with
the area based upon the following findings:
.
1. Approximately one-half of the project has been completed and
the proposed site plan revisions are generally consistent with
existing site development.
Chairman Retchin asked the petitioner, if he would like to
comment and does he concur with the findings as presented.
Mr. John R. Jefferies, representing Plantation Village,
Inc., stated the Master Plan for Phase II of Plantation Village
has been revamped and that he does concur with the findings of
fact as presented by the Planning staff.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone present would like to speak
in opposition to the modifications of the Special Use Permit as
presented. No one commented.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: Commissioner Greer MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to approve the following modifications to the Special Use
Permit:
1. Increase site acreage from 4.40 to 50 acres.
2. Reduce living units from 252 to 235.
. 3. Reduce site density from 6.09 to 4.8.
4. Increase site coverage as follows:
a. Structures:
b. Parking/walks:
c. Open space:
223,484SF (original 142,190SF)
302,342SF (original 238,400SF)
6,652,714 (original 1,422,848SF)
5. Permit enlargement of auditorium at Commons Building.
6. Elimination of on-site health center, replace with
contractual service arrangement with Davis Health
Care Center located next door.
7. Water system to connect to Cornelius Nixon Davis
Nursing Home with option of on-site community system.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the addendum to Special Use Permit #211, 8/83 is
hereby incorporated as a part of the minutes and is contained in
SUP Book I, Page 46.
.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RENAMING OLD MILITARY ROAD TO CAMP
WRIGHT ROAD LOCATED IN HARNETT TOWNSHIP BETWEEN BRADLEY HILLS
SUBDIVISION AND OLEANDER MEMORIAL GARDENS (SN-61)
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Director Hayes stated the request was initiated by
the residents living at the southern end of Old Military Road and
due to a duplication of names, they have requested the road to be
renamed to Camp Wright Road.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone present would like to speak
in favor of or in opposition to the proposed road renaming. The
following person commented:
~
("
42~
.,. _.,:
Mr. Charles Stehman, the petitioner, commented on the need
to rename the road in order to receive emergency responses .and
stated the residents of the street selected the name, Camp Wright
Road.
Chairman Retchin closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to rename the road from Old Military Road to Camp Wright
Road. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
A copy of the order is hereby incorporated as a part of the ~
minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 3.
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE
ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE SUBMISSION AND REVIEW OF
PLANS, SURETIES, WATER/SEWER APPROVALS, VALIDITY
PRELIMINARY PLANS AND RELATED CHANGES
Chairman Retchin opened the Public Hearing.
SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY
PERIOD OF
Motion: Commissioner Barfield MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Greer to deny the proposed text amendments and leave the
ordinance as written with enforcement thereof, which requires a
professional engineer and registered surveyor to sign-off on
preliminary plats. The floor was opened for discussion.
Substitute Motion: Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED to accept the
proposed revisions as submitted by the County Attorney dated
April 1, 1991. The MOTION DID NOT CARRY DUE TO NOT RECEIVING A
SECOND.
County Attorney Pope stated the Legal Department has no
problem with the proposed text amendments except for the
following items:
Definitions
o
(Add)
20-23 Plans, Construction: Plan, profile, and detail
drawings sufficient to indicate the construction of all
improvements associated with the property to be sub-
divided, prepared by a professional, legally recognized
by a State of North Carolina licensing board as being
licensed to perform such activities or undertakings.
(Revise)
32-2(3) The name and address of the owner and the firm
or individual preparing the plan; construction plans, if
included shall be prepared by a professional, legally
recognized by a State of North Carolina licensing board
as being licensed to perform such activities or under-
takings.
(Revise)
32-4 Buildinq Permits Issuance
Subject to sewer availability, building permits may be
issued after approval of construction plans if such .
plans are required by the County Engineer. Such approval
shall in no way alter the requirement that the final plat
be recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds prior
to the sale or lease of land or buildings within the sub-
division.
()
Chairman Retchin expressed concern for the Commissioners
requesting preparation of the proposed text amendments in order
to clarify the Subdivision Ordinance and recommended discussion
and action on the items presented.
Commissioner Barfield stated the Subdivision Ordinance is
fine as written and expressed concern amending the ordinance if
the existing ordinance complies to State law.
~
.
.
.
~
.~~. ..?~
42..5<: .
\::. i.~i ct,:"
,fJ
County Attorney Pope stated
incorporating the recommendations from
clarify the existing Subdivision
misinterpretations in the future.
the proposed revisions
the Legal Department will
Ordinance and avoid
Assistant County Manager Dave Weaver commented on recent
problems with the interpretation of the present Subdivision
Ordinance and stated the proposed revisions will greatly clarify
the regulations governing the subdivision development process.
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to speak on the proposed revisions. The fOllowing
person commented:
Attorney Lonnie Williams, representing the professional
engineers and registered surveyors, presented background
information on interpretation of the existing Subdivision
Ordinance and lawsuit between the State versus Paul Foster. He
requested the Board to support Commissioner Barfield's motion and
allow the ordinance to remain as written, which is in compliance
with Chapter 89 of the North Carolina General Statutes. He
stated the question to be answered before adoption of the
proposed text amendments is whether the Commissioners are willing
to allow proposed subdivisions to be laid out without involvement
of licensed professional engineers or registered surveyors.
Mr. William Grathwol, a member of the Planning Commission,
commented on the responsibilities of the Commission and stated he
does not feel the Planning Commission should determine the law
relative to the State of North Carolina and that, in his opinion,
the general statutes are clearly written and do not contain the
words "a licensing board" in the definition. He stated he is an
engineer by degree, not profession; therefore, he contracts with
professional engineers for final design and improvements to
subdivisions.
Assistant County Manager Dave Weaver commented on the
proposed sets of text amendments, one prepared by the Planning
Commission and the other prepared by the County Attorney with
additional revisions to those text amendments. He stated the
Planning Staff agrees with the set of amendments requiring
certification by a licensed board preparing construction plans
and encouraged adoption of the text amendments as proposed by the
County Attorney.
Planning Director Hayes commented on recent changes in the
subdivision review process and stated the existing ordinance does
not contain these changes, such as the Health Department no
longer performs soil analyses for subdivisions; therefore, the
ordinance does need to be amended to address these changes.
Chairman Retchin stated these issues should be addressed
separately with the Board of Commissioners and not presented in
one package.
After further discussion, Chairman Retchin called for a vote
on the MOTION by Commissioner Barfield to allow the existing
Subdivision Ordinance to remain as written. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Retchin commented on the format of the proposed
text amendments and stated it was very difficult to follow the
changes and comprehend what was actually being proposed. He
requested the Planning Director and County Manager to resubmit
some of the necessary revisions due to changes in the subdivision
review process in a manner which can be understood and more
clearly defined.
~
(
. 42-6
MEETING RECESSED TO HOLD A REGULAR MEETING OF THE NEW HANOVER
COUNTY WATER &: SEWER DISTRICT
Chairman Retchin recessed the meeting from 11: 44 0' clock
P.M. until 11:48 o'clock P.M.
REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A WORK SESSION TO HEAR PRESENTATIONS FROM
AUDITING FIRMS FOR AUDITING OF BUSINESS/PERSONAL TAX ACCOUNTS
Commissioner sutton stated after discussion with the Tax
Administrator he would like to schedule a ~ork Session to discuss
the possibility of hiring a firm to audit business/personal tax
accounts.
()
County Manager O'Neal stated he would be glad to arrange a
Work Session.
RESCHEDULING OF MEETINGS ON EASTER MONDAY
Vice-Chairman Mathews commented on the Easter holidays and
recommended that future meetings be scheduled on Tuesday instead
of Easter Monday.
Consensus: After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board
to direct the Clerk to reschedule meetings on Easter Monday to
the following Tuesday.
Discussion of State Permit Issued for Construction of Smithfield
Pork Plant on the Cape Fear River in Bladen County
Vice-Chairman Mathews inquired as to what action, if any,
should the Board take on the recent issuance of a state permit
allowing Smithfield to construct a Pork Plant which will
discharge treated wastewater into the Cape Fear River in Bladen
County.
Chairman Retchin stated after conversation with N. C. House
Representative Harry Payne, the problem appears to be that state
permitting regulations are not stringent enough; therefore, the
Board may wish to discuss this issue at the Legislative ()
Coordinating Council meeting to be held on Monday, April 8, 1991.
commissioner Sutton stated he does not feel the problem is
with the law, but with the State having enough personnel to
enforce the permitting regulations.
Chairman Retchin stated the City of Wilmington and Lower
Cape Fear Water & Sewer Authority may decide to institute a law
suit and if so, the County may want to participate.
Discussion of Local Enabling Bill to Increase the Room Occupancy
Tax by Three Percent
Chairman Retchin retracted his support of a local bill
enabling the County to levy an additional three percent (3%)
increase to the room occupancy tax with a portion of that revenue
being earmarked for solid waste disposal. He stated after
rethinking the proposal, he feels the tipping fee should pay for
the cost of solid waste disposal in the County, and if the
tipping fee has to be increased to $60, he would support the
increase instead of increasing the occupancy tax which will place
a burden on the tourism industry. Chairman Retchin informed the
Board that when discussing the proposed increase of the room
occupancy tax with members of the Board of Directors of the
Convention & Visitors Bureau, no opposition was expressed; ()
however, after requesting the local legislative delegation to
introduce the local bill, he received many complaints.
Commissioner Greer commented on the proposed local bill to
impose a 1% food and beverage tax and stated there is opposition
to this bill unless some of the monies collected are earmarked
for tourism.
County Manager O'Neal commented on the intent of the Board
to offset increasing the ad valorem property tax by seeking other
revenue sources and stated if the proposed 3% increase of the
room occupancy tax and proposed 1% food and beverage tax are not
enacted, the tipping fee will have to be increased at the
Landf i 11.
~
,.,
421
i~ '
commissioner Barfield expressed concern for an automatic
across-the-board increase by garbage haulers when increasing the
tipping fee and stated increasing the room occupancy tax would
not impact on the local citizens.
No action was taken.
.
Discussion of Funding for the Coast Line Convention Center
Commissioner Greer commented on funding the Coast Line
Convention Center and inquired as to why the County is financing
a private entity?
commissioner sutton stated he has been informed that the
Center is experiencing financial difficulties.
Deputy County Manager Gornto stated a number of entities are
involved at the Coast Line Convention Center: an inn, a
restaurant, shops, a railroad museum, and the Convention Center.
She stated the Coast Line Convention Center is a tenant in the
complex and is managed and operated by a non-profit corporation
which has been able to operate successfully with revenues
generated and monies received from the City and County. Other
entities may be experiencing financial difficulties; however,
the Center has been able to operate on projected revenues.
commissioner Sutton inquired as to the owners of the
buildings. Deputy County Manager Gornto stated Coast Line
Associates, a private partnership, owns the structures. No city
or county bonds are involved in the project; however, an urban
development action grant was received through the city of
Wilmington from the federal government. The city and county have
financially committed funds on a decreasing basis for five years.
.
Commissioner Greer inquired as to why the Coast Line
Convention Center is a separate entity from the Convention &
visitors Bureau? Deputy County Manager Gornto stated the
enabling state legislation requires that revenues generated must
fund tourism promotion and prohibits funding a single entity such
as a convention center. County Manager 0' Neal stated another
organization instead of the Convention & visitors Bureau could be
funded from the monies generated by the room occupancy tax for
the promotion of tourism.
Discussion of Attending the NACo Spring Conference in Salt Lake
ci ty, utah
Chairman Retchin requested the Commissioners to inform the
Clerk by April 8, 1991, if they plan to attend the NACo Spring
Conference to be held in Salt Lake City, Utah, in order to take
advantage of the discount air fares.
Vice-Chairman Mathews commented
funding and recommended that only the
this conference in order to save money.
on the shortfalls in
Chairman should attend
No action was taken.
ADJOURNMENT
.
Motion: Commissioner Barfield MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Greer to adjourn. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Retchin adjourned the meeting at 11:50 o'clock P.M.
~tz/~
Lucie F. Harrell
Clerk to the Board
~