1991-10-21 Regular Meeting
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 667
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met in Regular
Session on Monday, October 21, 1991, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. in the
Assembly Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North
Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
.
Members present were: Commissioners Jonathan Barfield, Sr.;
Robert G. Greer; William H. Sutton; Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews,
Jr.; Chairman Fred Retchin; County Manager, Allen O'Neal;
Assistant County Attorney, Wanda Copley, and Clerk to the Board,
Lucie F. Harrell.
Chairman Retchin called the meeting to order and welcomed
everyone present.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Clerk to the Board, Lucie F. Harrell, gave the invocation.
Vice-Chairman Mathews led the audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Chairman Retchin asked if anyone from the general public
would like to present an item not listed on the Regular Agenda or
speak on an item listed on the Consent Agenda.
No items or comments were received.
.
WITHDRAWAL OF ITEM #7 AND ITEM # 12 ON THE REGULAR AGENDA
Chairman Retchin stated the Health Director has requested
removal of Item #7 from the agenda until the night meeting of
November 4, 1991, and Staff has requested removal of Item #12 for
further study of the proposed amendment to the County Code
addressing regulations governing liquified petroleum tanks.
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to withdraw Items
#7 and #12 as requested. Item #7 is to be placed on the agenda
for November 4, 1991.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Retchin recommended a change in the wording of
Consent Agenda Item #5, Contract #92-0189 with Benchmark to
clearly state that the amount of the contract is not to exceed
$24,020.
Motion: After discussion, Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED, SECONDED
by Commissioner Barfield to approve the Consent Agenda items as
presented with a change in the wording of Item #5, Contract
#92-0189 with Benchmark to state that the sum shall not exceed
$24,020. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Approval of Minutes
The Commissioners
Meeting of October 7,
Board.
approved the minutes of the Regular
1991, as presented by the Clerk to the
.
Approval for Release of Penalties - Tax Department
The Commissioners released the following penalties as
recommended by the Tax Administrator since the taxpayers
certified they made a valid listing during the listing period:
Bethell, Eloise & George W.
Brown, William Donald II
Coastal Water Systems, Inc.
Everhart Datsun Nissan, Inc.
Gregory Murray Construction Co., Inc.
Horne, April D/B/A Kure Beach Motel
Lease Properties, Inc.
$ 5.82
$ 6.81
$ 49.55
$ 116.56
$ 87.48
$ 2.09
$ 1. 87
-~
(
I
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 668 .
Lee, Larry Audrey
Musser, James Neal Faydene
Paul R. Murphy PT D/B/A Wilm. Physical Therapy
RFP, Inc.
stone, Raymond & Susan D/B/A Lifetime Sports
Wonder Shop, Inc.
Wri. Family Care, D/B/A Sherwood Manor Rest Home
$
$
$ 98.19
$2,164.96
$ 6.15
$ 301.25
$ 12.96
24.60
7.02
The Commissioners granted the Senior Citizen/Disability
Exclusion for the following persons since they submitted letters
explaining the reason for filing late:
o
Adams, Josephine
Bennett, John Q. & Mamie
Buie, Reuben Kenneth
Phillips, Durant
Rouse, Elizabeth Brinkley
Taylor, Viola T.
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
The Commissioners granted value adjustments for the
following property owners because of conditions that had not been
brought to the attention of the Tax Department:
Barkley, David A. & Ann M.
Crawley, Samuel L., Jr.
Dukovic, Pamela M.
Evans, Rufus Monroe
Finnan, Susan B.
Gandy, Gregg Alan
Garcia, Adolfo
Goodson, Glenn W., Jr.
Grammas, Helen
Hammonds, Timothy, Sr. & Cheri
Hooker, Robert Walter
Hoppe, Barbara Gilgo
Lewis, Thomas R.
Marshall, Johnny W.
Meade, Clarence E., Jr.
Munday, Herbert L.
Potter, Lizzie Watson
Smith, Edity Boyette
Suggs, Ronald Linwood
Watkins, Betty
Wier, Ronald Lee
Wilson, James M.
$12,545
$ 5,250
$ 630
$ 2,210
$ 5,215
$14,225
$16,347
$14,220
$ 2,950
$ 5,915
$ 6,740
$ 1,416
$ 5,209
$11,530
$ 1,940
$ 1,802
$ 4,005
$ 3,610
$ 1,543
$ 380
$31,782
$ 1,600
o
The Commissioners released the following certification
penalty as this was the taxpayer's first offense:
Mercer, Iva Ruth
$
100
Acceptance of New Hanover County Tax Collection Reports thru
September 30, 1991
The Commissioners accepted the following Tax Collection
Reports thru September 30, 1991, as presented by the Collector of
Revenue:
New Hanover County Tax Collections
New Hanover County Fire District Tax Collections
o
Copies of the reports are hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and are contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 21.
Approval of Contract #92-0189 With Benchmark for Mounting and
Installing The Museum's Long-term Exhibit Artifacts
The Commissioners approved a contract with Benchmark in an
amount "not to exceed" $24,020 to mount and install the Museum's
long-term exhibit artifacts. The Chairman was authorized to
execute the necessary contract documents.
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
'1
~
.. . ~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 669
Adoption of Resolution Adding Vale, Trace, and Shoal Drives to
the State Highway System
The Commissioners adopted a resolution adding Vale, Trace,
and Shoal Drives in Bayshore Estates Subdivision to the State
Highway System. .
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 21.
.
Adoption of Resolution Requesting The State to Release New
Hanover County' s Share of Funds to the Cape Fear Council of
Governments
The Commissioners adopted a resolution requesting the State
to release New Hanover County's share of funds in the amount of
$13,335.01 to the Cape Fear Council of Governments in accordance
with provisions of Chapter 689, House Bill 83, Section 19 of the
1991 Session Law. These funds will be used for preparing grant
applications, economic development, community development,
support of industrial development activities, and other
activities deemed appropriate by the member governments.
A copy of the resolution is hereby incorporated as a part of
the minutes and is contained in Exhibit Book XIX, Page 21.
Approval of Budget Amendment #92-0061 Community Based
Alternative Agencies
The Commissioners approved the following Budget Amendment:
92-0061
Community Based Alternatives Agencies
Debit
Credit
Community Based Alternatives Aqencies
CBA Grants
Second Chance Program
$ 500
$3,000
. Cape Fear Substance Abuse/Crisis Line-Open House $3,500
Purpose: To budget additional funds for Cape Fear Substance
Abuse Center's Crisis Line-Open House Program. The program must
vacate its present facility when the lease expires on November
30, 1991. A new facility will have a higher rent cost. Funds
for the additional rent will come from the following sources:
(1) a program entitled, Second Chance, that was recommended for
CBA funding, but was not approved by the State; and (2) from CBA
funding that was not allocated prior to July 1, 1991, due to the
uncertainty of the State budget.
Approval of Budget Amendment #92-0060 for Space Study - County
Commissioners
The Commissioners approved the following Budget Amendment:
92-0060 County Commissioners' Office/Non-Departmental
Debit
Credit
County Commissioners' Office
Appropriated Fund Balance
$24,695
.
Non-Departmental
Contracted Services
$24,695
Purpose: To carryover funds from FY 1990-91 to FY 1991-92 for
the Space Study. Funds in the amount of $37,500 were approved
for the study in FY 1990-91 with $12,805 expended during that
period.
Report of Budget Amendment #92-0056 for Entry Into the Minutes
The following Budget Amendment was reported for entry into
the record:
92-0056 Non-Departmental and Outside Agencies/CUltural &
Recreational
Debit
Credit
Non-Departmental
Contingencies
$750
~
(
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 670 .
(Budget Amendment Continued)
Debit
Credit
outside Aqencies/Cultural & Recreational
Military Affairs Committee
$750
Purpose: To transfer funds from the Contingencies Account to
assist with a reception for area commanding officers. This
action was 'approved by the County Commissioners on September 16,
1991.
o
Report of Budget Amendment 192-0064 Non-Departmental/Sheriff' s
Department - Administration
The following Budget Amendment was reported for entry into
the minutes:
92-0064 Non-Departmental/Sheriff's Department/Administration
Debit
Credit
Non-Departmental
Contingencies
$35,104
Sheriff's Department
Salary and Wages
FICA
Retirement
Retirement - 401(K)
Medical Insurance
Contracted Services
Uniforms
$25,426
$ 1,945
$ 317
$ 1,271
$ 2,097
$ 288
$ 3,760
Purpose: To budget funds from Contingencies for two additional
bailiff positions in the Sheriff's Department as approved by the
County Commissioners on October 7, 1991.
o
Approval of Budget Amendment 192-0063 - Special Fire District
The Commissioners approved the following Budget Amendment:
92-0063 Special Fire District/Fire Departments
Debit
Credit
Special Fire District/Fire Departments
Appropriated Fund Balance $65,946
winter Park Volunteer Fire Department
$65,946
Purpose: To budget Fire District fund balance for initial
payment on a new tanker for the winter Park Volunteer Fire
Department. On May 22, 1991, the Board of Fire Commissioners
approved $140,000 for the purchase of the new tanker.
Approval of Two Fixed Based Operators' Lease Assignments to the
New Hanover County Airport Authority
The Commissioners approved assignment of the following lease
agreements to the New Hanover County Airport Authority: (1) Air
Wilmington; and (2) Aeronautic, Inc.
Copies of the assignments are on file in the Legal
Department.
()
Renewal of Contract 192-0186 with Attorney Louis K. Newton for
Tax Collections and Foreclosures
The Commissioners renewed the contract with Attorney Louis
K. Newton for tax collections and foreclosures as recommended by
Staff.
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
RECOGNITION OF NEW COUNTY EMPLOYEES
county Manager O'Neal welcomed and introduced the following
new County employees:
~~, -<1 -ii4
;~ '
, ~.J!'
~tl~.~ :.~
..,
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 671
1'",1 ';"!
.
Richard Lemon, Jr.
Paula Starling
Tammy Taylor
Deborah Reed
Sandra Hoppough
Ellen Harrison
Tommie Wells
Barbette Colvin
Deborah Mills
Jane Johnson
Michele Shackelford
Sylvia Hastie
Susan Taylor
Mary Roush
Linda Pearsall
Zelma Collins
Property Management
Aging Services
Dept. of Social Services
Emergency Management Services
Legal Department
Health Department
Library
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Dept. of Social Services
Health Department
Chairman Retchin, on behalf of the Board, welcomed the new
employees and wished them success in their new positions.
INVITATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN "BEGIN TO LIVE- SPONSORED BY THE
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER AND SERVICES, INC.
Ms. Mary Ann Lama, Executive Director, of the Domestic
Violence Shelter and Services, Inc., stated in recognition of
October as National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, the
agency is sponsoring a public event entitled "Begin to Live" on
October 30, 1991, at the flagpole area beside the City Hall from
12:30 P.M. until 1:00 P.M. Several women will tell their stories
of survival from abuse, and two local musicians will perform.
She invited the County Commissioners to attend the event,
and also presented a quilt square depicting the New Hanover
County Courthouse in recognition of the County's on-going
contributions to the agency.
.
Chairman Retchin expressed appreciation for the invitation
and stated, unfortunately, he will be out-of-town on October 30;
however, he is sure other members of the Board will be able to
attend.
APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT (CONTRACT #92-0121) WITH CAPE FEAR MUSEUM
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SHARED DISTRIBUTION OF MUSEUM FEES
Deputy County Manager, Mary Gornto, presented background
information on the Museum Foundation, which has been renamed Cape
Fear Museum Associates, Inc., and the proposed agreement for
shared distribution of Museum fees. The proposed agreement
defines the distribution of revenues between New Hanover County
and Cape Fear Museum Associates, Inc. as follows: (a) a
combined total annual income of $8,000 or less would be
distributed solely to Cape Fear Museum Associates Inc.; and (b) a
combined total annual income of more than $8,000 would be
distributed one-third to Cape Fear Museum Associates, Inc. and
two-thirds to the County with Cape Fear Museum Associates, Inc.
receiving no less than $8,000 annually.
.
Deputy County Manager Gornto stated Staff feels this
distribution will allow the County to receive a new source of
revenue and Cape Fear Museum Associates, Inc. to receive at least
the same amount of funds as received in the past; therefore,
Staff recommends approval of the agreement for an 18-month trial
basis.
commissioner Sutton expressed concern for an open-ended
amount of funds to Cape Fear Museum Associates, Inc. and stated
he could not support this agreement.
Motion: Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Barfield to approve the agreement as presented. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye: Commissioner Barfield
Commissioner Greer
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Retchin
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 672
voting Nay: Commissioner Sutton
A copy of the contract is on file in the Legal Department.
RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 2,
1991, ON THE CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF SUMMER REST ROAD
(SC-51,10/91)
Staff Planner, Sam Burgess, stated the subject road
encompasses a 560 foot portion of the northern end of Summer Rest
Road and is located southeast of Landfall approximately 700 feet
west of the Intracoastal Waterway. This portion of Summer Rest
Road is an improved 45 foot right-of-way that serves vehicular
access to five residential properties; therefore, the Planning
Staff feels the road should remain open. The petitioner and
adjourning residents are requesting the closure of this portion
of Summer Rest Road due to vehicular traff ic becoming trapped
because of inadequate turn-around and problems experience with
teenagers socializing at unreasonable hours during the night and
early morning hours.
A lengthy discussion was held on trying to accommodate the
residents without closing a vehicular access. Further discussion
was held on preparation of a proposal that would provide a
turn-around at the terminus of Summer Rest Road. Staff Planner
Burgess stated any form of turn-around would have to be approved
by the Department of Transportation.
commissioner Sutton recommended that a "dead end" road sign
be placed where Beech Road intersects with Summer Rest Road.
Staff Planner Burgess stated the possibility does exists that
placement of the present "no outlet" sign at the intersection of
Beech and Summer Rest Roads would be more effective; however, the
Department of Transportation would have to approve this request.
Motion: After further discussion, commissioner Sutton MOVED,
SECONDED by Commissioner Barfield to return the Resolution of
Intent to close a portion of Summer Rest Road to the Planning
Department and direct Staff to re-examine the issue to see if
other alternatives can be developed including writing a letter to
the Department of Transportation for placement of a "no outlet"
sign at the intersection of Beech and Summer Rest Roads and the
creation of some form of a turn-around at the terminus of Summer
Rest Road. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
POSTPONEMENT OF DISCOVERED VALUE APPEAL OF COMMERCIAL PARTY BOAT
OWNED BY ROBERT WOLFE
Commissioner Sutton commented on the letter received from F.
Fred Wright, a Marine Surveyor with M. B. Ward & Son, Inc., who
has requested an additional 30 days to perform the survey on the
boat owned by Mr. Robert Wolfe. He recommended postponing the
appeal until the second meeting in November.
Motion: After further discussion, commissioner Sutton MOVED,
SECONDED by Chairman Retchin to postpone the appeal of discovered
value until the meeting of November 18, 1991, in order to allow
time for the marine surveyor to perform a value survey of the
boat. The floor was opened for discussion.
commissioner Barfield and Vice-Chairman Mathews expressed
concern for the letter not being received until October 14, 1991,
and stated ample time has been given for the survey to be
performed.
Upon vote, the MOTION to postpone the appeal until November
18, 1991, CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
voting Aye: Commissioner Greer
commissioner Sutton
Chairman Retchin
voting Nay: Commissioner Barfield
Vice-Chairman Mathews
()
()
()
.
.
.
.,'k. ~~ '- , .,
,.,
J~_{ '~k~3~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 673
" I f~
CONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITION PROCESS FOR THE LUCILE SHUFFLER
BUILDING
County Manager 0' Neal commented on the disposition of the
Lucile Shuffler Center and stated extensive renovation is needed
in order for the facility to be bought up to code at an estimated
cost of $230,000. The facility could be used by the County,
donated to a private non-profit agency for public use, or sold.
If the property is sold, G.S. Chapter 160A, Article 12 will apply
with three competitive methods of sale: (1) sealed bids; (2)
negotiated offer and upset bid; and (3) public auction.
Staff recommends use of sealed bids if the Commissioners
decide to sell the property, and if the property is donated or
sold, there should be a clear stipUlation in the agreement that
the County is not responsible for the repair or renovation costs,
or for providing in-kind'services for the repair or renovation.
Chairman Retchin stated City Manager, Bill Farris, has just
requested consideration of the facility as a recreational
activity center for the disabled.
County Manager O'Neal stated the request from the City
Manager was faxed this morning; therefore, he has not had an
opportunity to discuss this request with the City.
commissioner Barfield expressed concern for the facility
continuing to deteriorate before being renovated by the County
and stated the building should be sold through the sealed bid
process.
Vice-Chairman Mathews cautioned selling the building, if the
facility could be utilized by the County and, also, stated
regardless of whom purchases the structure, the name "Lucile
Shuffler" should be perpetuated in honor of this outstanding
citizen.
commissioner Greer commented on the County's present space
needs, such as the Patrol Division of the Sheriff's Department,
and stated it would be foolish to dispose of this building at a
minimal price and within 1-2 years have to purchase or construct
another building at a much higher cost than involved with the
projected renovation cost.
Consensus: After further discussion, it was the consensus of the
Board to direct Staff to prepare recommendations including the
possibility of the County utilizing the building and complete
details for the sale of the building.
MEETING CONVENED FROM REGULAR SESSION TO HOLD A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
Motion: Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to convene from Regular Session to hold a meeting of the
New Hanover County Water & Sewer District. Upon vote, the MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Retchin convened from Regular Session at 9:50
o'clock A.M.
Motion: Commissioner Greer MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to reconvene to Regular Session. Upon vote, the MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Retchin reconvened to Regular Session at 9:59
o'clock A.M.
BREAK
Chairman Retchin convened from Regular Session for a break
from 10:00 o'clock A.M. until 10:20 o'clock A.M.
CONSIDERATION OF STRATEGIES FOR FY 1992-93 BUDGET PROCESS
County Manager O'Neal presented a plan for formulating the
~
(
I
I
!
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 674
FY 1992-93 budget with the current tax rate and stated major
changes will need to occur in order to accomplish this goal. The
major strategy in attempting to avoid tax increases is to reduce
the size of the County government. In the past, local government
has tried to provide improved and additional services, but with
the current revenue and expenditure forecast, this will no longer
be possible. Current services may have to be reduced or
eliminated. A primary reason for the predicted funding shortfall
is due to the culmination of capital projects at one time. The
major strategy in attempting to avoid tax increases is to reduce
the size of the County workforce by 5%. The most reasonable
approach for downsizing the workforce is through attrition;
however, a 5% reduction may not be accomplished through
attrition, therefore, involuntary layoffs may occur. If this
should occur, management has worked to prepare a plan that will
treat all employees equitably and with as much dignity as
possible.
()
County Manager O'Neal stated a great deal of research and
time has been involved with preparation of the downsizing plan;
however, as the County goes through the process, amendments and
changes may need to occur. He stated monthly and bi -weekly
reports will be forwarded to the Commissioners as the plan is
implemented and emphasized the fact that many difficult decisions
will have to be made by the Board of County Commissioners.
The following plan was presented:
DOWNSIZING PROCESS:
1. Identify essential services and determine necessary level.
2. Scrutinize non-essential services and determine desired
level.
()
3 .
Maintain the total FY 1992-93 departmental operating and
capital appropriations at the FY 1991-92 level.
4. Achieve a 5% reduction in authorized positions prior to July
1992, through elimination or downsizing of existing
programs, attrition, and transfer of positions.
5. Appropriate no fund balance until the fund balance is at an
acceptable level.
6. Eliminate or reduce funding to non-county agencies.
7. Establish the capital Improvement Program as an integral
component of the budget process.
8. Establish a Service Excellence Program.
STEPS TO REDUCE POSITIONS BY 5%
This process will examine all operations assuring that they
are provided in an efficient manner, maximizing resources. All
County services and programs will be reviewed to determine if
they should be continued.
Steps to Reduce positions by 5%:
o
1. The County will freeze all vacant positions for two months
to evaluate if needed. Departmental reorganization will be
considered when eliminating positions. The levels of
supervision as well as span of control will be scrutinized.
positions will be reviewed by the Management Team. The
process will be handled with fairness and equity.
2.
All County programs will
options to see if they
efficient/effective manner:
be evaluated by the following
could be provided in a more
(a) contracting for services
(b) Combine programs
.
.
.
, i :t
'. j
,.,
. '. ; t
~.," .l'i.;.,:t\
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 675
~l.... ~.
(c) Eliminate programs
(d) Consolidate services with another government
(e) Reduce scope of program
3. A retirement incentive package will be offered.
4. Volunteers will be utilized where possible.
5.
Reclassify work status from full to part time position as
feasible.
OTHER COST SAVINGS:
1. The County will review the days and hours of operations of
all County facilities.
2. The County will review the benefits program.
3. When presenting FY 1992-93 budget requests, department heads
will be required to present a budget request option showing
their departmental operating budget at 90% of the FY 1991-92
level.
COMMUNICATION:
1. On a regular basis, the County staff and elected officials
will be informed on how the process is progressing and of
any changes that will be required. If anticipated results
are not achieved, specific positions will be reviewed for
elimination.
2.
The press will be informed and kept up to date so they
understand the process and can explain to the citizens the
efforts that the County is making as well as any changes in
County operations.
SERVICE EXCELLENCE PROGRAM:
1. A "Service Excellence Program" will be implemented that
emphasizes the citizen as the customer.
The following non-monetary methods to increase productivity
or morale will be reviewed:
(1) Compressed work week
(2) Flexible Work Environment
(3) Job Sharing
EDUCATION:
1. Department heads will be educated in downsizing.
2. Remaining employees should receive all the training and
tools needed to perform their job.
OUT PLACEMENT:
1.
Policies will be developed if out placement becomes
necessary.
2. All policies will be in writing and reviewed by the Legal
Department.
REDUCTION IN FORCE POLICY
If the reduction in force has not been accomplished through
attrition, the Reduction In Force Policy will be implemented.
The purpose of the policy is to provide a legally sound and
equitable method for reducing New Hanover County's workforce
through the following steps:
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE ,676
i~
1. PURPOSE AND POLICY:
A. PurDose: This policy provides for a legally sound and
equitable method for reducing New Hanover County's
workforce for reasons of curtailment of work or lack of
funds. The implementation of these procedures will be
in accordance with the directi ves of the County to
systematically separate employees.
B.
criteria: The elimination of budgeted positions
subsequent separation of employees will conform to
criteria stated herein, and will be reviewed
compliance by the Director of Human Resources and
County Attorney:
and
the
for
the
()
1. positions targeted for elimination will be
identified according to classification, pay grade
assignment, assigned duties and responsibilities,
relationship to other positions in the department
or division, and the number of like, or similar
positions in the department.
2. In selecting employees to layoff during a
reduction in force, consideration will be given to
current employment status, length of service with
New Hanover County, qualifications, and work
performance.
C. General provisions: These quidelines shall govern the
orderly reduction of positions, procedures to follow in
selecting employees to be separated due to the
reduction of positions, and pOlicies/practices
regarding reinstatement:
1.
Upon approval of the Reduction-in-Force by the
County Manager and the Board of County
Commissioners, department heads will review the
directives of the 'plan with their staff.
()
2. Each department head in accordance with the
established guidelines will prepare for the County
Manager's review, a roster of positions to be
eliminated and employees to be terminated. This
must be submitted to the County Manager not later
than February 3, 1991.
D. PayOut provisions
E. Out Placement provisions
F. Appeal Rights
2. HEALTH BENEFITS
A. Medical
B. Dental
C. Miscellaneous Insurance Programs
c'
3 .
RETIREMENT
A. N. C. Local Government Employees' Retirement System
B. 401(K) Services
C. NACO Deferred Compensation
RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PACKAGE:
This package is a part of New Hanover County's
Reduction-In-Force Policy of March 1992. It is intended to
provide incentives for County employees, who are qualified for an
unreduced retirement allowance in hopes that it might offset
employee layoffs under this Reduction-in-Force Policy. The
.
.
.
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 677
County is offering this one-time package in an attempt to reduce
the possibility of having to layoff other individuals.
PART-TIME PACKAGE:
In a continuing effort to reduce costs and maintain an
acceptable level of service, alternative staffing arrangements
are being considered. As the need exists to periodically review
positions to determine whether or not they are still classified
correctly and assigned to the proper pay grade, it is also
necessary to review and determine whether the need for a position
still exists, and if so, if it needs to be funded at its current
level. The changing demographics of the work force have caused
employers to look at their work schedules and if possible to
consider alternate schedules that will accommodate the personal
needs of the employee without seriously affecting productivity or
service delivery. One such alternative is the reduction in the
number of hours for which positions are budgeted.
A period of questions and answers was held on the plan.
County Manager O'Neal requested that the Board adopt the
following items in order to proceed with the downsizing plan:
(1) the Downsizing Process Policy; (2) proposed
Reduction-In-Force Policy; (3) Retirement Incentive Package; and
(4) Part-Time Package.
commissioner Barfield commented on the $5.5 million
shortfall for the upcoming budget and recommended that the public
be made aware of the facts involved as to why the shortfall
occurred. He commented on bond referendums for capital projects,
such as the Museum expansion and new Senior Center, as a major
reason for the shortfall and recommended preparation of a fact
sheet that will list the debt service payback for these projects.
Emphasis was stressed on properly informing the public and County
employees of the facts since they will be impacted by the
downsizing plan.
County Manager 0' Neal stated the bond issues are not the
only factors involved with the shortfall, but cutbacks in federal
and state funds to local governments have tremendously impacted
on counties and cities as well as the slow down in economic
growth across the entire nation. He stated New Hanover County is
unique in the fact that downsizing has not occurred before this
year when so many other local governments have already reduced
their workforce. He complimented department heads for their
cooperative attitudes and stated working closely together through
the downsizing process will help to avoid as much pain as
possible.
commissioner Greer complimented the County Manager for
beginning the downsizing process and stated he does not feel the
entire shortfall can be blamed on bond indebtedness when the
human services budget has increased 17.39% for the current year.
At this rate, within three years, the human services budget will
have increased by $15 million and in order to continue to operate
the County government without raising taxes, the the federal,
state, and local governments must re-assess human service needs.
He emphasized the importance of supporting people in need, but
strongly opposed helping people for greed.
Chairman Retchin expressed appreciation to Staff for a well
conceived plan, and stated the Commissioners will work with Staff
in implementing the downsizing process as necessary.
Motion: After further discussion, Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED,
SECONDED by Commissioner Sutton to adopt the Downsizing Process
Policy; Reduction-In-Force Policy; Retirement Incentive Package;
Part-time Package and memorandums to County employees, outside
agencies, and outside human services agencies funded by New
Hanover County. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
~
(
i
I
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 678
DISCUSSION OF JUVENILE SERVICES CENTER
Commissioner Sutton stated during these difficult budget
times, he strongly feels the Juvenile Services Center is the
responsibility of the State and should be operated by the State,
not New Hanover County. He recommended notifying the State that
the County will cease to operate the facility within 60 days or
the County will be glad for the State to use and operate the
facility as currently being done in Wake County. He also
commented on psychiatric and counseling services being provided
at the Juvenile Services Center and stated the Southeastern
Center can perform these services at a reduced rate.
Deputy County Manager, Mary Gornto, stated when the General
Assembly appropriated additional funds in July, 1991, to be used
for juvenile detention expenses throughout the State, a new
reimbursement per day/per client rate had to be determined. As
of this date, a new rate has not been determined by the State;
however, the County has been informed that a reimbursement figure
has been proposed that will be significantly increased over the
current rate and will be retroactive to July 1, 1991. Until
Staff has been informed of the new reimbursement rate, no
specific operation cost can be calculated for continuing the
operation of the County's facility. As for psychiatric services,
the Center has two social workers on staff for counseling
services with utilization of the Southeastern Center when
psychiatric services are needed.
Consensus: After discussion of the $500,000 being funded by the
County for operation of the Center, it was the consensus of the
Board to direct Staff to: (1) prepare a recommendation requesting
the State to operate the facility as currently being done in Wake
County; and (2) prepare a report on legal requirements for
cancelling the current contract with the State for operating the
New Hanover County Juvenile Services Center. This item is to be
presented to the Commissioners as soon as possible.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
Appointment of Joan Harrison to Fill an Unexpired Term on the
Library Advisory Board
Motion: Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Greer to appoint Joan Harrison to fill the unexpired term of
Jeramiah partrick on the Library Advisory Board. The term is to
expire August 31, 1994. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Reappointment of Paul D. Campbell and Phyllis Roebuck to the
Human Services Allocation Advisory Board
Motion: Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to reappoint Paul D. Campbell and Phyllis Roebuck to
serve 3-year terms on the Human Services Allocation Advisory
Board. The terms are to expire October 18, 1994. Upon vote, the
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Reappointment of Marion Rogers to Serve on the Human Services
Transportation Advisory Board
Motion: Commissioner Sutton MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Barfield to reappoint Marion Rogers to serve a 3-year term on the
Human Services Transportation Advisory Board representing the
over age 60 population. The term is to expire October 18, 1994.
Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Appointment of Moe Kotler to Fill an Unexpired Term on the Jury
Commission
Chairman Retchin stated at the request of the Jury
Commission a letter was written on September 26, 1991, to Gary
Hawkins, a current member of Commission, expressing concern for
his absenteeism. He was requested to inform the Commissioners by
October 7, 1991, if he desired to remain as a member of the Jury
Commission. No response has been received as of this date;
o
o
()
~. ~~. ""'~:
~-~~I: r'~?'
~'.~ '.l.J~~L
'!%3P ,:~;' "......
~
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 679
<,
therefore, a new member should be appointed to fill the unexpired
term. Only one application has been received in the name of Moe
Kotler.
Motion: After discussion of the heavy workload and the immediate
need to fill the vacancy, Chairman Retchin MOVED, SECONDED by
Vice-Chairman Mathews to appoint Moe Kotler to fill the unexpired
term of Gary Hawkins on the Jury Commission. The term is to
expire June 30, 1993. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
.
Appointment of Chairman Fred Retchin to Serve on the Resource
Conservation Development District for Region .0. Board
Chairman Retchin stated the Board has received a request for
appointment of a County Commissioner and a member of the Planning
commission to serve on the Resource Conservation Development
District for Region "0" Board.
Consensus: After discussion of Chairman Retchin presently
serving on the Region "0" Executive Committee, it was the
consensus of the Board to appoint Chairman Retchin to serve on
the Resource Conservation Development District for Region "0"
Board. The Clerk was instructed to contact the Planning Director
for appointment of a member from the Planning Commission.
Discussion of Committee Applications
Vice-Chairman Mathews commented on applicants applying to
various boards and stated, in the future, if an applicant has an
application on file and would like to be considered for another
committee appointment, he/she must fill out a new application.
He expressed concern for applications being copied and placed in
the agenda packet, when the application does not list specific
qualifications and reasons for the applicant desiring to serve on
that particular board.
.
Consensus: After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board
that applicants must fill out an individual application for each
vacancy available within the advertised deadline.
Discussion of Cost for Publication of Agenda in the Neighbors
Section of the Star-News and Wilmington Journal
Vice-Chairman Mathews commented on the cost involved with
publishing the agenda in the Neighbors Section of the Star-News
and Wilmington Journal, and asked if the Board should continue
this practice? He stated the notice is excellent; however, a
considerable amount of money can be saved.
County Manager 0 I Neal stated the Board decided to publish
the agenda in the newspaper for the purpose of better informing
the general public on items to be discussed. After observing
this procedure for the past year, it appears that this notice has
not increased attendance or invol vement by the general public;
therefore, this expenditure is not absolutely necessary.
Clerk to the Board, Lucie F. Harrell, stated the cost for
the publication in the Wilmington Journal is approximately $2,000
annually and $6,048 annually for the Neighbors Section of the
Star-News.
.
Commissioner Sutton stated the practice is good and that
several watch groups are very pleased with this publication;
however, it would be nice if the newspapers would provide this ad
as a public service.
commissioner Greer stated he does not feel the entire agenda
should be published in the newspaper.
Consensus: After further discussion, it was the consensus of the
Board to direct the Clerk to see if the agenda size can be
reduced in order to decrease the cost of agenda publication in
the Star-News and Wilmington Journal.
~
(
r
l
I
t
f
L
; .
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 21, 1991
PAGE 680
Reso1ution of Appreciation of Gregory Hines
Commissioner Sutton commented on the actor, Gregory Hines,
who visited New Hanover County schools and presented
inspirational speeches to school children on the importance of
staying in school and completing a high school education. He
recommended that the Board prepare a resolution expressing
appreciation for this gesture.
Motion: After discussion, Commissioner Sutton MOVED, SECONDED by
Chairman Retchin to prepare a resolution of appreciation to
Gregory Hines. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
()
Discussion of Procedures Used by the Tax Auditing Firm
Commissioner Greer expressed concern for the manner in which
Tax Management Associates, Inc. has been investigating business
tax records for the past five years instead of the current year.
He stated if a firm is being audited and there is a discrepancy,
then the firm should be reviewed for past records; however, if the
records have been audited with no improprieties, the books should
be closed without further investigation.
commissioner Barfield agreed and stated he feels the
County's Tax Department should handle these audits in order to
avoid local businessmen from feeling that their companies have
been singled out for a witch hunt.
Motion: After further discussion, Commissioner Greer MOVED,
SECONDED by Commissioner Barfield to instruct Tax Management
Associates, Inc. not to go beyond the past year in performing the
audit of businesses unless some improprieties are found at which
time the firm can review the past five years of listing records.
The floor was opened for discussion:
commissioner Sutton expressed concern for this motion
conflicting with State law as well as the current contract with ()
Tax Associates, Inc. and stated the contract should be reviewed by
the Legal Department before taking action of this type.
Chairman Retchin recommended placing this item on the agenda
for November 4, 1991, with a thorough discussion of the contract
and services being rendered by Tax Management Associates, Inc.
Motion Withdrawn: Commissioner Greer withdrew the MOTION.
Consensus: It was the consensus of the Board to schedule a
discussion of the contract with Tax Management Associates, Inc.
as agenda item for November 4, 1991.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Vice-Chairman Mathews MOVED, SECONDED by Commissioner
Sutton to adjourn. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Retchin adjourned the meeting at 11:50 o'clock A.M.
~~ct;;~
~bF. Harrell
Clerk to the Board
o
~ ''''1''
~
, ~ ';8!
, ,,"
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
681
ASSEMBLY
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met in Special
Session on Monday, October 21, 1991, at 1:00 o'clock P.M. in Room
501 of the New Hanover County Administration Building, 320 Chestnut
Street, Wilmington, North Carolina.
.
Members present were: Commissioners Jonathan Barfield, Sr.;
Robert G. Greer; William H. Sutton; Vice-Chairman E. L. Mathews,
Jr.; Chairman Fred Retchin; County Manager, Allen O'Neal; Assistant
County Attorney, Wanda Copley; and Clerk to the Board, Lucie F.
Harrell.
Chairman Retchin called the Special Session to order and
stated the purpose of the Work Session is to hear a presentation on
strategic planning for New Hanover County; however, Deputy County
Manager, Mary Gornto, would like to discuss the current contract
with the Ogden/New Hanover Rescue Squad and the pending law suit
involving overtime compensation for EMS employees who volunteer to
serve on rescue squads.
.
Discussion of Contract with ogden/New Hanover Rescue Squad
Deputy County Manager, Mary Gornto, stated the amended 90-day
contract with the Ogden/New Hanover Rescue Squad has expired. As
of this date, the lawsuit with the Department of Labor has not been
resolved and the squad with only two paramedics is not capable of
providing the contracted level of service; however, the County has
continued to pay for the same level of service. After discussion
and review of the situation with the squad, staff has recommended
that the Ogden/New Hanover Rescue Squad provide crash/rescue
service only until the lawsuit is resolved. with the current
budget restraints, the members of the squad and staff are working
to allow the unit to continue to exist and at the same time provide
county services to justify the amount of funds being allocated.
Commissioner Barfield expressed concern for liability involved
with any volunteer rescue squad providing medical services and
recommended, in the future, focusing on crash/rescue services for
a}l volunteer units.
After further discussion, Deputy County Manager Gornto stated
the Board will be informed of any new developments in the lawsuit
and of any agreement reached in resolving this situation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING PRESENTATION
Assistant to the County Manager, Pat Melvin, presented the
following outline and facts on strategic planning:
.
Ie THE CHALLENGE: Like many other communities today, New Hanover
County is facing a particularly challenging time. With federal
revenue down, state revenues being cut, local taxpayers insisting
on no new taxes, and mandates for new programs coming from every
direction, it is imperative to prepare now to meet these challenges
of the 21st century. Additionally, consideration for downsizing
and handling of solid waste, as well as issues of privatization of
and city/county operation of various services currently provided by
the County, necessitate the establishment of long-term direction,
and a framework within which to make budget and service delivery
decisions.
II. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS: In the past, a comprehensive planning
approach has been employed to address such needs. Comprehensive
planning allows a community to address a very broad range of
community concerns looking at suitable goals for every aspect of
community life. These goals were supported almost entirely by
federal grants. Action plans such as these focus on what the
organization would look like at the end of a given period, based
upon traditionally stable physical and economic growth patterns.
These growth patterns are no longer stable; therefore, we must
~
(
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
682
employ methods which allow more careful evaluation, selection, and
implementation of alternative approaches to the funding and
delivery of necessary public services. In this process, we must
draw upon the available resources of various organizations and
institutions. Implementation is the key to strategic planning.
Its focus is the allocation of scarce resources to critical issues.
Development of the action plan sets the stage for the crucial phase
of implementation.
The strategic planning approach allows such process of
evaluation, selection, and implementation to occur as well as
allowing the County to determine future needs and chart the course
for accomplishing the most effective way to meet these needs.
utilization of the strategic planning process will have significant
positive impact upon the efficiency of New Hanover County
government operations, improved and simplified selection of service
delivery functions, and result in financially viable programming
within the County.
o
strategic planning not only develops future direction, it
improves internal operations of the County, and improves the
County's public relations. It allows the County to discover and
build upon its strengths, and to identify and remedy weaknesses in
the County government system. In the strategic planning process,
the Board of Commissioners and administration staff envision the
County's future direction and develop the necessary organization,
staff, procedures, and controls to achieve that future.
III. PROPOSAL TO REMEDY - STRATEGIC PLANNING: with a growing
emphasis on sound management, we must consider the use of strategic
planning processes. Done properly, we will determine the County's
mission, programs, and services to offer to accomplish our mission,
and how we will attract and utilize the resources we need (people,
funding, expertise, facilities, etc.) in order to accomplish our
mission.
o
strategic planning will allow the County to develop the best
vision possible and what the County should look like in a nominal
period (5 years), its mission, services, staff, financing, etc. It
will allow the County to determine how we will move toward the
future--causing the County to become a proactive agent rather than
reactive. strategic planning is a systematic approach to managing
change and creating the best possible future.
There are a number of strategic plans currently in process
throughout the County: (1) Consideration of downsizing in the
County; (2) Water & Sewer Strategic Planning; (3) Waste-to-Energy
Advisory Board exploring public versus private operation; (4)
City/county mergers such as the police/Sheriff Records and Dispatch
Merger, Joint Planning commission, and Joint Parks & Recreational
Programs; (5) 1-40 Planning; and (6) Multi-county Solid Waste
Program; and (7) Comprehensive Plan by County Planning Department.
Although each item listed is addressing isolated or singular
issues, they are strategic plans.
Guidelines for developing a Strategic Plan for New Hanover
County were presented along with the discussion of the following
issues that must be focused upon for realistically developing a
plan:
o
1. Do we want to enter a strategic planning process?
2. Is the Board of County commissioners committed to the
planning?
3. will this effort be conducted internally, covering County
governmental operations only; or will it be community-
wide?
4. Will this effort be a new one, or will we build upon
~ .r~ ::t.",
.!' ,. f,C.\ :~: ~ !i (
-..,
"l~"~:'
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
683
data, resources, etc. gathered in strategic planning
projects currently in progress?
5. Are leadership and County staff resources currently
available for this effort?
6. What is the time frame within which the project must be
accomplished.
.
7.
Are there technical or political problems which will be
incurred in carrying out this process? If yes, what,
when, and how will they be handled?
Vice-Chairman Mathews stated the proposed plan is excellent,
and asked if additional costs will be involved? Assistant to the
County Manager, Pat Melvin, stated with utilization of County
resources, the plan could be prepared for approximately $10,000 to
$12,000; however, when providing the Service Excellence training,
outside resources will have to be utilized.
County Manager O'Neal stressed the importance of preparing a
Strategic Plan that is manageable and not too complicated. He
encouraged the Commissioners to become deeply involved in this
process in order for the plan to become a useful tool for future
budgeting and planning.
.
commissioner Barfield commented on the importance of keeping
special interest groups from being involved in preparing the plan
in order to meet the needs of all groups within the community. He
encouraged the Commissioners to be very selective when appointing
the community task force that will work on development of the plan.
Discussion was held on the importance of clearly defining the
mission statement in order to develop a successful and workable
plan. Emphasis was placed on the County Commissioners being truly
committed to the following the plan, and development of a mission
statement that will be realistic and provide the best services
possible with the amount of funds available.
Chairman Retchin, on behalf of the Board, complimented Ms.
Melvin for an excellent presentation and outline for developing a
Strategic Plan for New Hanover County.
Consensus: After further discussion,it was the consensus of the
Board for the Assistant to the County Manager to proceed with
development of a Strategic Plan.
County Manager O'Neal stated the Commissioners will be
informed on the stages of development of the plan.
WORK SESSION ON WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITY
County Manager O'Neal stated Director of
Management, Ray Church, would like to present an
Waste-to-Energy Facility.
Environmental
upda te on the
The following report was presented:
.
Waste-To-Energy Facility
Boiler #2 and Boiler #3 were available for the entire month.
Boiler #1 was available 42.8% of th~ month due to repairs
being made to the charging chute refractory, grate, and
electrostatic.
Turbine/Generator #1 is still down for repairs. Stator and
rotor have been returned to the factory for repair.
Turbine/Generator #2 was available all but 46 hours during
September. Repairs to a gland condenser consumed 38 of those
hours with the remaining time due to CP&L outages.
Turbine/Generator #3 was available all but 14.5 hours with all
~
(
I
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
684
outages due to CP&L planned or unplanned power failures.
The acid gas scrubbers and nitrous oxide control systems were
tested during the week of September 16. Test results are
expected in October.
Landfill
Final payment of the Dickerson contract for Cell #2 closure
has been negotiated with a change order addressing those
changes. Arbitration hearings for the resolution of the
dispute between Dickerson, Inc. and National Seal have been
.scheduled for the week of October 14.
()
The State has reviewed the permit addendum for Cell #4A
construction and made only minor comments. Construction
drawings are on hold until an issue concerning the access road
is resolved.
The new caterpillar dozer arrived at the end of the month has
already been put into service.
In an effort to determine the types of wastes continuing to be
disposed in the landfill, a survey was conducted using daily
records of waste type. The major components are as follows:
(1) Waste-to- Energy ash representing 54 % ; (2) mixed
construction representing 14%; and (3) concrete, brick, and
dirt representing 11.8%.
Recycling
Forty-three tons of recycleables were recovered
which is down from the August recovery rate.
follows with the overall reduction in the waste
declines in the fall.
in September
This rate
stream which
()
A host site has been located for the first unmanned drop-off
site. Staff is in the process of developing a design ,for the
site receptacles.
Other Department Activities
Analyses have been received from the groundwater samples at
the Trask dump site and forwarded to the State for evaluation.
Split sample results from the State have not been made
available. General review indicates no benzene present but
elevated inorganics (metals) in some wells.
Specialized Marine has completed remedial activities at
Jetstream at the Airport.
The Phase I audit of the National Guard property at the
Airport has been completed with no evidence of contamination
found. Engineering has been requested to proceed with the
acquisition of this property.
The acquisition of the wixtrom Property (dredge spoil site)
has been turned over to Engineering. Involvement with the
Corps of Engineers and design discussions can be better
addressed through Engineering.
()
Mr. Jim Hestle, General Manager of Nashville Thermal,
addressed the Waste-to-Energy Advisory Committee on september
26. His discussion was primarily on public operation through
an authority.
Proposals have been received for the removal of
underground storage tanks on County properties.
proposals are currently being evaluated.
nine
These
.
.
.
~
~ ,'" 4;. '>,
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
685
A bid opening was held for a used all terrain forklift for the
Waste-to-Energy Facility.
Discussion was held on CP&L outages. Director Church stated
Staff is in the process of investigating why CP&L bumps the Waste-
to-Energy Facility off-line when they experience a power failure,
and then bills the County $3,000 for being bumped off-line. He
stated a report will be forwarded to the Commissioners after
meetings have been held with CP&L.
commissioner Barfield expressed concern for employees dealing
with high voltage and not being thoroughly familiar with the
equipment and safety regulations. He stressed the importance of
hiring a technical electrical engineer with a mechanical background
to handle problems of this nature as well as train employees.
commissioner sutton stated when the recommendations are
presented by the Waste-to-Energy Facility many of these items will
be addressed.
Discussion was held on the reduction of the waste stream and
the measurement of landfill wastes. Further discussion was held
on additional capacity of the Waste-to-Energy Facility and the
possibility of offering waste disposal to Pender County. Director
Church stated during the off-season (September through February)
additional capacity is available; however this is not the case
during the spring and summer months.
COMMISSIONER BARFIELD EXCUSED FROM THE MEETING
Commissioner Barfield was excused from the meeting at 1:59
o'clock P.M. due to a prior commitment.
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH ENGINEERING SURVEY
Discussion was held on performance of an engineering survey.
commissioner Sutton recommended performing a survey of the Waste-
to-Energy Facility as soon as possible. Assistant County Manager,
Dave Weaver, stated R. W. Beck & Associates, a firm who performed
a. third-party review for the County at the beginning of the
project, is willing to perform a complete audit of the facility for
approximately $30,000.
Further discussion was held on the need for a survey.
Commissioner Sutton emphasized the importance of knowing that all
items are in order as well as having the availability of factual
information to encounter negative statements being made about this
state-of-the-art facility.
County Manager O'Neal stated the survey is a professional
service and the County can proceed with contracting for an audit of
the facility within the next 30 days.
Consensus: After further discussion, it was the consensus of the
Board to proceed with performing an engineering survey.
Chairman Retchin,
Director Church and the
for the progress report
in the operation of the
on behalf of the Board, complimented
employees at the Waste-to-Energy Facility
and many improvements that have been made
plant.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Commissioner Greer MOVED, SECONDED by Vice-Chairman
Mathews to adjourn. Upon vote, the MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS:
Voting Aye: Commissioner Greer
Commissioner Sutton
Vice-Chairman Mathews
Chairman Retchin
Excused: Commissioner Barfield
~
(
I
,
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 21, 1991
686
P.M.
Chairman Retchin adjourned the Work Session at 3:21 o'clock
~ect~ ~
~~F. Harrell
Clerk to the Board
o
()
o