HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER MEETING AGENDA PACKETNEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
Andre’ Mallette Training Center
New Hanover County Government Center
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 135, Wilmington, NC 28403
Members of the Board
Donna Girardot, Chair - Paul Boney, Vice-Chair
Thomas ‘Jordy’ Rawl – Ernest Olds – Jeffrey B. Petroff – H. Allen Pope – Colin J. Tarrant
Wayne Clark, Director of Planning & Land Use – Ken Vafier, Planning Manager
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 6:00 PM
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Donna Girardot)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Planning Manager Ken Vafier)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (August 2020)
REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The Planning Board may consider substantial changes in these petitions as a result of objections,
debate, and discussion at the meeting, including rezoning to other classifications.
1. Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z20-13) - Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner,
Desirable Properties, LLC, to rezone approximately 31.31 acres of land located at the northwest
corner of Sidbury Road and Dairy Farm Road from R-15, Residential District, to (CZD) RMF-L,
Conditional Residential Multi-Family Low Density, in order to develop a multi-family project
consisting of 288 units.
2. Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z20-15) – Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner,
Redland Development Incorporated, to rezone approximately 7.15 acres of land located at 8814
Market Street (Hwy 17), north of Futch Creek Road, from R-15, Residential District, and B-1,
Neighborhood Business, to (CZD) RMF-L, Conditional Residential Multi-Family Low Density
District, and (CZD) CB, Conditional Community Business District, in order to construct a 60-unit
townhome development and an 8,000 square foot retail/office/personal service building.
3. Quasi-Judicial Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S-603M) - Request by the Law Offices of Matthew A. Nichols on
behalf of the property owner, Plantation Village Inc., to modify the Special Use Permit for the
Plantation Village Continuing Care Retirement Community to allow for the redevelopment of the
eastern portion of the community and to increase the maximum number of units to 300.
OTHER ITEMS
1. Development Code Update (Unified Development Ordinance Project)
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 9/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner
CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing -
Rezoning Request (Z20-13) - Request by Design Solu4ons on behalf of the property owner, Desirable Proper4es,
LLC, to rezone approximately 31.31 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Sidbury Road and Dairy Farm
Road from R-15, Residen4al District, to (CZD) RMF-L, Condi4onal Residen4al Mul4-Family Low Density, in order
to develop a mul4-family project consis4ng of 288 units.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is seeking to rezone approximately 31 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Sidbury Road and
Dairy Farm Road from R-15 to (CZD) RMF-L in order to develop a mul0-family project consis0ng of 288 units.
Under the County's performance residen0al standards, the site would be permi6ed up to 78 dwelling units at a density
of 2.5 du/ac as currently zoned. The proposed 288 units equates to an overall density of 9.2 du/ac.
It is es0mated the site would generate about 60-80 trips during the peak hours if developed at the current permi6ed
density. The proposed RMF-L development would increase the es0mated number of peak hour trips by approximately
40 and generate about 100 trips in the AM peak and 120 trips in the PM peak.
The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) which has been approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The
TIA analyzed the development of 320 mul0-family units on the subject property (which exceeds the 288 units
proposed). The required improvements consist of installing and extending mul0ple turns lanes on Blue Clay Road and
Sidbury Road, and realigning the Blue Clay Road/Sidbury Road intersec0on to allow for eastbound/westbound free
flow movement.
The site has an unique shape resul0ng in the vast majority of its boundary abuDng an arterial or collector road
corridor, including Interstate 40. Most of the neighboring property is either undeveloped or used for nonresiden0al
purposes (NHC Schools Bus Depot, SeaTech). While the surrounding area was zoned for low density housing in the
1970s, the 2016 Comprehensive Plan recommends a mixture of higher density housing and commercial uses along the
Sidbury Road corridor.
The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as Community Mixed Use. The proposal is generally CONSISTENT
with the Comprehensive Plan because mul0-family development is a typical land use within areas designated as
Community Mixed Use, and because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densi0es for the
area. In addi0on, it provides for diverse housing op0ons and an orderly transi0on from a major road corridor to areas
zoned for lower density housing.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval and suggests the following mo0on:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a condi0onal RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because mul0-family development is a typical land use within areas
designated as Community Mixed Use, and because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended
densi0es for the area. In addi0on, mul0-family housing is generally more appropriate along major road corridors like
Interstate 40 than low density single-family housing. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and
in the public interest because the proposal would benefit the community by providing diverse housing op0ons.
[Oponal] Note any condi0ons to be added to the district.
Example Mo4on for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a condi0onal RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because mul0-family development is a typical land use within areas
designated as Community Mixed Use, and because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended
densi0es for the area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the
proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely
impact the adjacent neighborhoods.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1
SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z20-13)
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Desirable Properties, LLC, to rezone
approximately 31.31 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Sidbury Road and Dairy Farm
Road from R-15, Residential District, to (CZD) RMF-L, Conditional Residential Multi-Family Low
Density, in order to develop a multi-family project consisting of 288 units.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for
rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because multi-family
development is a typical land use within areas designated as Community Mixed Use, and
because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densities for the area.
In addition, multi-family housing is generally more appropriate along major road corridors like
Interstate 40 than low density single-family housing. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal would benefit the
community by providing diverse housing options.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because multi-family
development is a typical land use within areas designated as Community Mixed Use, and
because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densities for the area,
I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the
proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the
density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to [Approve/Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district. I find it to be
[Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert
reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 2
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 1 of 18
STAFF REPORT FOR Z20-13
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z20-13
Request:
Rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf – Design Solutions Desirable Properties, LLC
Location: Acreage:
Northwest corner of Sidbury Road and Dairy Farm Road 31.31
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R01800-003-012-001 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped 288 Multi-Family Units
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15 (CZD) RMF-L
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single-Family Residential R-15
East Northern NHCS Transportation Division, SeaTECH R-15
South Undeveloped R-15
West Interstate 40 n/a
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 2 of 18
ZONING HISTORY
July 7, 1972 The site was initially zoned R-15 (Area 8A)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be
determined during site plan review.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Station Castle Hayne
Schools
Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools
For more information, see the school data below.
Recreation Northern Regional Park, Blue Clay Bike Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
The Conservation Resources Map indicates that pocosin wetlands may be
present on the site. The applicant’s conceptual site plan indicates that there
are approximately 3.3 acres of wetlands on the site. Verification of
regulated wetlands will be required during the site plan review process.
Conservation space is required for pocosin or swamp forest wetlands when
at least five acres of the resource exists on the property.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 3 of 18
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The applicant is proposing to construct
a multi-family development consisting
of 288 units.
The units will be located within 15
buildings containing 12 to 24 units
each. The buildings can be three
stories with a maximum height of 45
feet.
The applicant’s proposed conceptual
plan indicates that 10.7 acres (about
34%) of the site will be within open
space area, exceeding the County’s
requirement of providing 20% open
space.
The buildings will be located a
minimum of 480 feet from existing
single-family homes, which exceeds
the 20-foot buffer requirement
between attached housing and single-
family dwellings.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 4 of 18
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Under the County’s performance residential standards, the site would be permitted up to
78 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du/ac. The proposed 288 units equates to an overall
density of 9.2 du/ac.
The subject site has a unique location in that three sides border street rights-of-way (I-40,
Sidbury Road, and Dairy Farm Road). Only about 230 feet of the site boundary abuts
a residentially zoned property.
While the subject property is located adjacent residentially zoned land, much of the
surrounding area is undeveloped or used for nonresidential purposes. New Hanover
County Schools owns about 79 acres directly east of the site along Dairy Farm Road
containing a school bus storage area and SeaTECH.
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 5 of 18
TRANSPORTATION
The site is accessed by Dairy Farm Road, a NCDOT maintained collector road. An
interchange to I-40 is located north of the site on Holly Shelter Road.
As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 60-80 trips during the
peak hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed RMF-L development
would increase the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 40.
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM
Typical Development under
Current Zoning: 78 single-family homes 60 AM / 80 PM
Proposed RMF-L
Development:
288 Multi-Family mid-rise
units 97 AM / 122 PM
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 6 of 18
Traffic Impact Analysis
The applicant has completed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the project which has been
approved by NCDOT and the WMPO. The TIA analyzed the development of 320 multi-
family units on the subject property (which exceeds the 288 units proposed).
The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable
intersections in the area and requires the following roadway improvements:
1. Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Extension of the eastbound left turn lane.
Installation of a westbound right turn lane.
Installation of a southbound left turn lane.
2. Blue Clay Road at Sidbury Road
Realignment of the intersection to provide stop control for the southbound
approach only, allowing for the eastbound/westbound movements to
operate at free flow.
3. N. College Road at Blue Clay Road
Installation of a westbound right turn lane.
Extension of the westbound left turn lane.
Signal modification.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 7 of 18
Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Scenario Overall LOS Delay in Seconds
AM PEAK – Southbound Approach (Worst Approach)
2020 Existing B 12.9
2024 Future without Project C 15.7
2024 Future with Project C 20.9
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements C 16.9
PM PEAK – Southbound Approach (Worst Approach)
2020 Existing B 12.2
2024 Future without Project B 14.7
2024 Future with Project C 19.6
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements C 15.9
Required Improvements to Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 8 of 18
Blue Clay Road at Sidbury Road
Scenario Overall LOS (Delay in Seconds)
AM PEAK
Westbound Southbound
2020 Existing C (16.5) A (4.8)
2024 Future without Project D (29.3) A (4.9)
2024 Future with Project E (48.1) A (5)
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements A (0) C (18.8)
PM PEAK
Westbound Southbound
2020 Existing B (13.9) A (6.6)
2024 Future without Project C (20.4) A (6.7)
2024 Future with Project D (28) A (6.9)
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements A (0) C (20.7)
*The westbound and southbound movements are shown as they are impacted the most by the
recommended improvements. The northbound movement will remain relatively unaffected, with
the improvements resulting in less than a one second delay. In addition, Blue Clay Road
terminates at I-40 resulting in a relatively low number of dwelling units located north of this
intersection (approximately 20-25).
Required Improvements to Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 9 of 18
N. College Road at Blue Clay Road
Scenario Overall LOS Delay in Seconds
AM PEAK
2020 Existing C 28
2024 Future without Project E 61.4
2024 Future with Project E 65
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements E 58.6
PM PEAK
2020 Existing D 49
2024 Future without Project F 145
2024 Future with Project F 164.8
2024 Future with Project &
Improvements F 136.2
Required Improvements to Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 10 of 18
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 11 of 18
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. Sidbury Farms 655 single-family dwellings
103 townhomes
Approved February 12,
2020
Build Out Years:
o 2024 – 258 SFDs
o 2029 – 421 SFDs, 59
townhomes
o 2034 – Full Build
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of right and left turn lanes at the site’s access points on Sidbury Road (Phase
1).
Installation of southbound right turn lane and westbound right turn lane, and extension of
the westbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lane at the intersection of N.
College and Blue Clay Road (Phase 2).
Installation of a roundabout at Sidbury Road and Blue Clay Road (Phase 2).
Installation of a southbound left turn lane at Dairy Farm Road and Sidbury Road (Full
Build)
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Scott’s Hill Medical
Blake Farms
Scott’s Hill Village
Cape Landing
Coastal Prep Academy
Development Status: Construction plans for Phase 1 are currently under review.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Cape Landing 126 single-family
Approved December 21,
2017
2021 Build Out Year
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Extension of the existing eastbound left-turn lane at Blue Clay Road and N. College Road.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
None
Development Status: Phase 1 is nearing completion with approximately 55 homes being
constructed and occupied.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 11
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 12 of 18
SCHOOLS
Students generated from this development would be assigned to Wrightsboro Elementary,
Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet,
year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
Seventy-eight dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base density,
and 288 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 210 dwelling
units.
Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school
students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling
unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to
generate 69.05 (22.57 elementary, 11.42 middle, and 16.36 high), which is
approximately 50.35 more students than if developed under existing zoning.
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation
Existing Development 0 residential unit Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
Typical Development under
Current Zoning 78 residential units Total: 18.7
(8.38 elementary, 4.24 middle, 6.08 high)
Proposed Development
under Proposed (CZD) MF-L
Zoning
288 residential units
Total: 69.05
(30.95 elementary, 15.66 middle,
22.44 high)
*Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County
public school student enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year by the estimated number of
dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield
different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the
number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes
students attending out-of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac
Bear, and SeaTECH.
School Enrollment* and Capacity**—2021-2022 Estimates
Level
Total NHC
%
Capacity
School
Enrollment of
Assigned
School
Capacity of
Assigned School
w/ Portables
% of Capacity
of Assigned
School
Funded
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 97% Castle
Hayne 483 529 91% None
Middle 107% Holly
Shelter 917 934 98% None
High 105% Laney 2063 1903 108% None
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 12
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 13 of 18
*Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020-2021
school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020-2021
school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications
refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional
children’s classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population
such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn’t specifically designed
with those spaces.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area. The southern portion of the property
is within an AE Special Flood Hazard Area with a base flood elevation of 31.7 to 31.8
feet.
The property is within the Prince George Creek (C;Sw) watershed.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on
the property consist of Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to
CFPUA sewer services.
CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY
The property has a unique shape resulting in the vast majority of its boundary abutting an
arterial or collector road corridor, including Interstate 40.
While the area was zoned for low density housing in the early 1970s, the 2016
Comprehensive Plan recommends a mixture higher density housing and commercial uses
along the Sidbury Road corridor.
The property is located near the Cape Fear Community College North Campus, which has
been identified as a growth node in the Comprehensive Plan.
Most of the surrounding land is either undeveloped or used for nonresidential purposes
(NHC Schools).
The proposed concept plan positions a portion of the stormwater facilities closer to the
existing single-family homes to the north of the site, resulting it the proposed buildings
being over 450 feet from an existing residential structure.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 13
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 14 of 18
Representative Developments of RMF-L:
Woodlands at Echo Farms Amberleigh Shores
Stephens Pointe
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 14
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 15 of 18
Representative Developments of R-15:
Grayson Park Clay Crossing
Plantation Landing
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 15
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 16 of 18
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in
proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately
developed with either place type, allowing site-specific features and
evolving development patterns in the surrounding area to be considered.
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors.
Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational,
commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential.
Analysis
The subject property is located on the corner of Dairy Farm Road and
Sidbury Road. It is situated between Southeast Area Technical High School
(SEA-Tech) to the east and single family residential to the north, with vacant
property to the south. The entire western property line borders I-40 to the
west. The CFCC North Campus Area Growth Node is located across I-40.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates that multi-family residential is typical,
and is an appropriate land use within Community Mixed Use place type
that will allow future developments to accommodate population growth in
a greater range of housing types.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 16
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 17 of 18
In general, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along roadways for
higher residential densities and a mix of uses as Community Mixed Use in
order to allow for an orderly transition of densities and intensities. The
proposed development would serve as an appropriate transition in intensity
from the interstate and CFCC Growth Node to existing residential districts
and future Community Mixed Use development along Sidbury and Blue
Clay Roads. Water and sewer service will be extended to that portion of
Sidbury Road to serve the project.
The Community Mixed Use place type provides opportunities for moderate-
density housing (up to 15 units/acre) for multi-family and single-family
residential, with building heights up to three stories. The overall project
density of 9.2 units/acre meets the proposed density range and building
height for the Community Mixed Use place type.
The proposed development allows for the area to obtain the desired small-
scale, compact mixed-use development pattern providing an efficient use
of land between an interstate highway and areas of future development.
It also assists in meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan by providing
for a range of housing types, opportunities, and choices.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed CZD MF-L zoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because multi-family development is a typical land use
within areas designated as Community Mixed Use, and because the
proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densities for the
area. In addition, it provides for diverse housing options and an orderly
transition from a major road corridor to areas zoned for lower density
housing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the application and suggest the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because multi-family
development is a typical land use within areas designated as Community Mixed Use, and
because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densities for the area.
In addition, multi-family housing is generally more appropriate along major road corridors
like Interstate 40 than low density single-family housing. I also find APPROVAL of the
rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal would benefit
the community by providing diverse housing options.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 17
Z20-13 Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 18 of 18
Example Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because multi-family
development is a typical land use within areas designated as Community Mixed Use, and
because the proposed number of units is in-line with the recommended densities for the area,
I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the
proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the
density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 18
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 6 - 2
Page 3 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_______________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
Application
Applicant/Agent Information Property Owner(s)
If different than Applicant/Agent
Name
Owner Name
Company
Owner Name 2
Address
Address
City, State, Zip
City, State, Zip
Phone
Phone
Email
Email
Subject Property Information
Address/Location
Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage
Existing Zoning and Use(s)
Future Land Use Classification
Application Tracking Information (Staff Only)
Case Number
Date/Time received: Received by:
CINDEEWOLF
DESIGNSOLUTIONS
POBOX7221
WILMINGTON,NC28406
910-620-2374
CWOLF@LOBODEMAR.BIZ
DESIRABLEPROPERTIES,L.L.C.
341NORTHGREENMEADOWSDR
WILMINGTON,NC28405
910-799-8483(CONTACT:BUDBLANTON)
BUDBLANTON@AOL.COM
NWCORNEROFDAIRYFARMROAD(SR2181)&SIDBURYROAD(SR1336)
323116.93.8897[R01800-003-012-001]
31.31
R-15/VACANT
COMMUNITYMIXED-USE
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1
Page 4 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: ______________________ Total Acreage of Proposed District: __________
Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional
Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose
of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed).
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Proposed Condition(s)
Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the
development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These
conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community.
Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board,
and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
(CZD)MF-L 31.31 AC.
PROPOSEDTHREE-STORYAPARTMENTBUILDINGSWITHACCESSORYAMENITYAREAS,PARKING&
STORMWATERFACILITIES.TOTAL288DWELLINGUNITS.
**REFERENCESITEPLANFORSITELAYOUT&IMPROVEMENTS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2
Page 5 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed
for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
ITE Land Use: _________________________________________________________________________________
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): __________________________________
AM Peak Hour Trips: ___________________________ PM Peak Hour Trips: ______________________________
CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific
use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very
dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can
create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community-at-large. The applicant must
explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District
meets the following criteria.
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development? (For
example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans)
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property’s classification on the
Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
MID-RISEAPARTMENTS (223)
CALC'DPERDWELLINGUNIT=288
86112
Thepoliciesforgrowthanddevelopmentencouragesafeandaffordablehousingtobeavailabletoevery
citizen.SustainabilityoftheCountydependsonsensiblein-fillandmaximizinguseoflandsaccessibleto
services.
ThetractisidentifiedintheComprehensiveLandUsePlanasaCommunityMixed-useplacetype.Theplan
suggestshigherdensitiestosupportthesmall-scale,compactdevelopmentpatternsthattheplacetype
promotes.Theproposeddevelopmentisanacceptabletransitionadjacenttothebusyhighwaycorridor.
SidburyRoadconnectstheEast&WestsidesofthenorthernsectionoftheCountybetweenMarketStreet&
BlueClayRoad,whichthenextendstoCastleHayneRoad.Thetractisadjacenttotheinterstatehighway.
Single-familyresidencesarelessattractivealongabusytrafficcorridors,whereastransitionofdensityisan
acceptableplanningstrategy.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3
Page 6 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed
items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as “N/A”.
Applications must be complete in order to process for further review.
Required Information Applicant
Initial
Staff
Initial
1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application.
2 Application fee – ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An
additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review).
3 Community meeting written summary.
4 Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips).
5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page
reference of the property requested for rezoning.
6 Site Plan including the following elements:
x Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads.
x Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential
uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be
occupied by each structure and/or subdivided boundaries. For non-
residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height
of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific
purpose for which it will be used.
x Development schedule including proposed phasing.
x Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local
traffic near the tract, proposed right-of-way dedication, plans for access
to and from the tract, location, width and right-of-way for internal streets
and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas.
x All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks,
rights-of-way, buffering and signage.
x The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable.
x Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
x Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding
General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be
regulated by State law or Local Ordinance.
x Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change
(Ref. Article VII, as applicable).
7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard
copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan.
8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans.
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5
Legal Description for
Conditional District Rezoning of
31.31‐acre Tract at NW Corner of Dairy Farm Road & Sidbury Road
BEGINNING at a point at an existing NCDOT right‐of‐way monument in the eastern right‐of‐way
of Interstate Hwy. 40 at its intersection with the northern right‐of‐way of Sidbury Road (also
known as SR 1336), a variable‐width public right‐of‐way; running thence from said point of
beginning with the eastern boundary of I‐40:
Along a curve to the left, having a Radius of 11,619.16 feet and Length of 931.55 feet, a Chord
of North 18057’18” West, 931.33 feet to a point; thence
North 21037’15” West, 201.28 feet to a point; thence
North 21044’49” West, 1400.22 feet to a point in the southern
boundary of Blue Clay Road (also known as SR 1318), a 60‐foot public right‐of‐way;
thence with that southern boundary of Blue Clay Road,
North 26021’58” East, 94.16 feet to a point; thence
North 79039’19” East, 25.31 feet to a point; thence
South 56008’49” East, 208.15 feet to a point in the western boundary of Dairy Farm Road (also
known as SR 2181), a 170‐foot public right‐of‐way; thence with the eastern boundary
of Dairy Farm Road,
Along a curve to the left, having a Radius of 1,039.93 feet and Length of 158.38 feet, a Chord of
South 25039’42” East, 158.23 feet to a point; thence
South 32049’48” East, 157.95 feet to a point; thence
South 34033’57” East, 1,178.51 feet to a point; thence
South 36003’00” East, 156.73 feet to a point; thence
Along a curve to the left, having a Radius of 631.97 feet and Length of 365.01 feet, a Chord of
South 49047’44” East, 359.96 feet to a point; thence
South 60006’46” East, 157.45 feet to a point; thence
South 61044’23” East, 140.28 feet to a point; thence
South 43046’25” East, 298.85 feet to a point; thence
South 26014’06” East, 140.84 feet to a point; thence
South 26019’47” East, 12.45 feet to a point at the intersection of Dairy Farm Road with the
northern right‐of‐way of Sidbury Road; thence with that northern boundary of Sidbury
Road,
South 77035’19” West, 450.76 feet to a point, thence
South 77018’33” West, 644.16 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 31.31 acres,
more or less.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING NOTIFIACTION
BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Project Name: Sidbury Landing – a Multi-family Residential Community
Proposed Zoning: R-15 to (CZD) RMF-L
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a project proposal and an exhibit of the site
layout for the above proposed zoning application was sent to the adjacent property owners set
forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of
the Sunshine List on June 1, 2020. The mailing gave the recipients opportunity to contact us with
questions or comments via telephone or email. Copies of the written notices and the site layout
are attached.
The persons responding were: Reference attached list of contacts received from calls and
emails. Discussions were generally more inquiries than specific project comments. None of
the respondents voiced opposition to the proposal.
Date: June 29, 2020
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7
Community Information
Sidbury Landing
NameAddressEmail (Optional)
Bob Maultsby4800 Blue Clay Rdmaultsbyestimating@gmail.com
Anhony Tucker4904 Blue Clay RdTel. 910‐512‐5095
Richard Harrell4815+/‐ Blue Clay Rdreharrell38@embarqmail.com
Walter ClarkSidbury FarmsTel. 704‐560‐9576
Bobby PitmanInterested Partybobbypittman417@yahoo.com
Geoff KingInterested Partygking@gkinkproperties.com
Deirdre Dunn110 Deerfield RdTel. 910‐212‐0611
CeCe NunnWilmington Business Journalcnunn@wilmingtonbiz.com
Michael PraatsLocal Daily Mediamichael.p@localdailymedia.com
Ben SchachtmanPort City Dailyben@localvoicemedia.com
Cindee WolfProject Plannercwolf@lobodemar.biz
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 8
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 9
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
7
-
1
0
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
OW
N
E
R
NA
M
E
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
AD
D
R
E
S
S
C
I
T
Y
/ ST
A
T
E
/ ZI
P
S
I
T
U
S
AD
D
R
E
S
S
AL
L
S
B
R
O
O
K
RO
B
E
R
T
DO
U
G
L
A
S
4
9
2
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
2
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
AL
L
S
B
R
O
O
K
RO
B
E
R
T
DO
U
G
L
A
S
4
9
2
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
5
3
3
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
AM
B
E
R
SU
N
LL
C
5
0
0
0
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
1
6
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
AM
B
E
R
SU
N
LL
C
5
0
0
8
CA
S
T
L
E
LA
K
E
S
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
5
0
0
0
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
AM
B
E
R
SU
N
LL
C
5
0
0
0
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
5
0
0
8
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
DE
N
N
I
S
W
1
5
0
8
MI
L
I
T
A
R
Y
CU
T
O
F
F
RD
#2
0
2
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
3
5
2
3
0
SI
D
B
U
R
Y
RD WILMINGTON
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
IN
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
LL
C
4
4
2
1
BR
A
N
T
L
E
Y
CI
R
SH
A
L
L
O
T
T
E
,
NC
28
4
7
0
4
8
0
0
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
BO
N
H
A
M
LA
R
R
Y
G
4
9
1
7
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
1
7
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
CA
P
E
FE
A
R
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
CO
L
L
E
G
E
4
1
1
FR
O
N
T
ST
N
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
1
3
0
1
0
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
LP WILMINGTON
CA
R
O
L
I
N
A
PO
W
E
R
& LI
G
H
T
CO
P
O
BO
X
15
5
1
R
A
L
E
I
G
H
,
NC
27
6
9
8
4
6
0
0
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
FO
R
IN
Q
U
I
R
Y
IN
C
2
5
2
5
WO
N
D
E
R
WA
Y
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
1
DA
R
R
E
L
L
DO
U
G
L
A
S
A KA
Y
N
E
O
5
0
0
8
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
5
0
0
8
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
DE
S
I
R
A
B
L
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
LL
C
P
O
BO
X
31
2
2
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
6
FO
X
BE
T
S
Y
4
8
5
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
5
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
GO
N
Z
A
L
E
Z
LU
I
S
F AN
A
E P AZ
U
A
R
A
7
1
9
MI
D
D
L
E
SO
U
N
D
LO
O
P
RD
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
1
1
4
8
3
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
HA
R
R
E
L
L
RI
C
H
A
R
D
E
1
5
9
HE
N
R
Y
MI
D
D
L
E
T
O
N
RD
WA
R
S
A
W
,
NC
28
3
9
8
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
MA
R
S
T
O
N
RI
C
H
A
R
D
HE
N
R
Y
II
I
4
8
4
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
4
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
MC
R
A
E
JO
H
N
HE
N
R
Y
1
5
3
8
JE
S
S
U
P
ST
R
E
E
T
AV
E
BR
O
N
X
,
NY
10
4
5
2
4
9
0
5
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
MC
R
A
E
JO
H
N
HE
N
R
Y
1
5
3
8
JE
S
S
U
P
AV
E
BR
O
N
X
,
NY
10
4
5
2
4
9
0
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
MI
T
C
H
E
L
L
JA
M
E
S
WA
D
D
E
L
L
CY
N
T
H
I
A
4
9
0
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
0
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
NE
W
HA
N
CN
T
Y
BO
A
R
D
OF
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
6
4
1
0
CA
R
O
L
I
N
A
BE
A
C
H
RD
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
1
2
5
3
0
1
SI
D
B
U
R
Y
RD WILMINGTON
NI
C
H
O
L
S
KE
N
N
E
T
H
W DO
R
I
S
5
0
0
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
5
0
0
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
PA
R
K
S
LA
R
R
Y
L BA
R
B
A
R
A
L
4
8
3
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
2
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
PA
R
K
S
LA
R
R
Y
L BA
R
B
A
R
A
L
4
8
3
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
3
3
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
PI
G
F
O
R
D
CA
R
R
I
E
V
1
1
0
4
2N
D
ST
S
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
1
4
9
0
7
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
PL
A
T
T
MO
R
G
A
N
N
4
9
1
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
1
1
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
TA
D
L
O
C
K
DO
N
A
L
D
JE
N
E
A
N
E
C
2
1
1
6
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
RD
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
NC
28
4
0
1
4
9
1
5
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
TU
C
K
E
R
AN
T
H
O
N
Y
1
0
1
SH
E
A
R
I
N
HI
L
L
S
DR
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
9
0
4
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
WA
T
K
I
N
S
ST
E
V
E
RO
S
E
M
A
R
Y
4
8
0
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
0
9
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
WO
O
D
A
L
L
JE
N
N
I
F
E
R
P CH
A
R
L
E
S
A
4
8
2
7
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD
CA
S
T
L
E
HA
Y
N
E
,
NC
28
4
2
9
4
8
2
7
BL
U
E
CL
A
Y
RD CASTLE HAYNE
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
7
-
1
1
P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Project Information Notice
June 1, 2020
To: Adjacent Property Owner
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: Sidbury Landing
My clients are interested in developing a multi‐family residential community on lands within
the proximity of your property. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District
approval from New Hanover County.
A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with
specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project.
Essentially, this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be
developed. A sketch plan of the project layout is enclosed.
The County requires that the developer notify the property owners within an adjacency to the
project and hold a meeting for any and all interested parties. This is intended to provide
neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal, and for questions to be
answered concerning project improvements, benefits, and impacts.
Due to the current COVID‐19 issue, however, a meeting cannot be held at this time. In lieu of
that, you can contact me with comments or questions at:
Telephone: 910‐620‐2374, or
Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
We can also set up an on‐line meeting for a forum with multiple parties if requested. Please let
me know if you are interested in that alternative and arrangements will be made. All contact,
comments, concerns, and recommendations must be recorded in a report delivered to the
County along with a rezoning application.
Prior to this project being reviewed by the Planning Board & Commissioners, you will receive
subsequent notices of those agendas directly from the County. Those meetings provide public
hearings for comment on any issues pertinent to approval of the proposal.
We appreciate your interest and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the
community.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 12
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 13
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 14
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 15
August 17, 2020
Ms. Dionne Brown, PE
Davenport
4600 Marriott Drive, Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27612
RE: Approval of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed
Dairy Farm Road
New Hanover County, NC
Dear Ms. Brown,
The WMPO, NCDOT, and New Hanover County staffs have reviewed the Sidbury Crossing Traffic Impact
Analysis sealed July 8, 2020. This approval is based on the following land uses as proposed in the TIA:
320 apartments (LUC 221 Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise)
Based on review of the analysis provided in the TIA report, the following improvements are required by the
developer:
SR 1336 / SR 1572 (Sidbury Road) at SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) (stop-controlled full movement T-
intersection)
o Extend the eastbound left turn lane to 275 feet of storage (or maximum available without
modifying the bridge).
o Construct a westbound right turn lane with taper only.
o Construct a southbound left turn lane with 50 feet of storage, 50 feet of full width deceleration,
and 200 feet of taper.
SR 1336 / SR 1572 (Sidbury Road) at SR 1318 (Blue Clay Road) (stop-controlled T-intersection)
o Realign the intersection to provide stop control for the southbound approach only, allowing the
eastbound and westbound approaches to operate free flow.
US 117 (N. College Road) at SR 1318 (Blue Clay Road) (signalized full movement intersection)
o Construct a westbound right turn lane with 150 feet of storage, 50 feet of full width deceleration
and 200 feet of taper.
o Extend the westbound left turn lane ~150 feet to connect to the two-way left-turn lane.
o Revise signal.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1
Page 2 of 2
SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) at Site Access 1 (proposed stop-controlled full movement intersection)
o Construct the site access with one ingress and one egress lanes.
o Provide stop control for the eastbound approach.
o Provide 100 feet of internal protected stem on the eastbound approach.
o Design site access according to NCDOT standards
SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) at Site Access 2 (proposed stop-controlled full movement intersection)
o Construct the site access with one ingress and one egress lanes.
o Provide stop control for the eastbound approach.
o Provide 100 feet of internal protected stem on the eastbound approach.
o Design site access according to NCDOT standards.
SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) at Site Access 1 (proposed stop-controlled full movement intersection)
o Construct the site access with one ingress and one egress lanes.
o Provide stop control for the eastbound approach.
o Provide 100 feet of internal protected stem on the eastbound approach.
o Design site access according to NCDOT standards.
If changes are made to the proposed site driveways and/or land use, the current trip distribution may need to
be modified and would require a revised Traffic Impact Analysis to be submitted for review by the NCDOT,
WMPO, and New Hanover County. This approval will become null and void.
The applicant is required to obtain all applicable County and NCDOT permits for access to the road network. All
applicable NCDOT and County technical standards and policies shall apply.
Please contact me at 910-772-4170 with any questions regarding this approval.
Sincerely,
Kayla Grubb, EI
Project Manager
Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Ec: Mike Kozlosky, Executive Director, WMPO
Bill McDow, Transportation Planner, WMPO
Scott James, PE, Transportation Planning Engineer, WMPO
Denys Vielkanowitz, PE, City Traffic Engineer, City of Wilmington
Brian Chambers, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Wilmington
Ben Hughes, PE, District Engineer, NCDOT
Eva Covarrubias, EI, Transportation Engineering Associate, NCDOT
Jessi Leonard, PE, Division Traffic Engineer, NCDOT
Jon Roan, Assistant District Engineer, NCDOT
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 8 - 2
This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post-consumer content.
All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is 100% recyclable.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
June 26, 2020
Sidbury Crossing
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for HH Multi, LLC
Project #: 200218
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 1
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
2
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 1
Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for HH Multi, LLC
June 26, 2020
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................. 2
Figure 1 – Site Plan ..................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2A – Site Location Map .................................................................................... 4
Figure 2B – Vicinity Map .............................................................................................. 5
2.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 6
2.1 Inventory ................................................................................................................ 6
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................ 7
Figure 3 – Existing Lane Geometry ............................................................................. 8
Figure 4 – 2020 Base Traffic Volumes ......................................................................... 9
3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements ................................. 10
3.1 Approved Developments ...................................................................................... 10
3.2 Committed Improvements .................................................................................... 10
4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 11
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards ....................................................................... 11
5.0 Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................. 12
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria ..................................................................... 12
6.0 2024 Full Build Conditions................................................................................... 13
6.1 Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................... 13
6.3 2024 Future No Build Traffic ................................................................................ 13
6.4 2024 Full Build Total Traffic ................................................................................. 13
Figure 5– Primary Trip Distribution ............................................................................ 14
Figure 6 – 2024 Future No Build Volumes ................................................................. 15
Figure 7 – Site Trips .................................................................................................. 16
Figure 8 – 2024 Future Build Volumes ...................................................................... 17
6.5 Full Build Discussion of Results ........................................................................... 18
6.6 Full Build Recommended Improvements ............................................................. 22
Figure 9 – Full Build Recommended Improvements .................................................. 23
7.0 Queue Results ...................................................................................................... 24
8.0 Summary and Conclusion ................................................................................... 27
Appendix ...................................................................................................................... 28
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 3
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 2
Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for HH Multi, LLC
June 26, 2020
1.0 Introduction
The proposed Sidbury Crossing is to be located across Sidbury Road between I-40 and
Dairy Farm Road in New Hanover County, North Carolina. The development will utilize
three (3) site accesses. All three site accesses are proposed to be full access with each
located on Dairy Farm Road between Sidbury Road and Blue Clay Road. Figure 1
shows the site plan. Figures 2A and 2B show the site location map and vicinity map,
respectively.
The Sidbury Crossing will be analyzed for one (1) full build:
• Full Build will consist of 320 apartment dwelling units. The build year for Full
Build is assumed to be 2024.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this
development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to
accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The
following intersections were included in the study:
1. Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road (unsignalized)
2. Sidbury Road at Blue Clay Road (unsignalized)
3. Blue Clay Road at N. College Road (signalized)
4. Dairy Farm Road / S.R. 2181 at Site Access 1 (unsignalized)
5. Dairy Farm Road / S.R. 2181 at Site Access 2 (unsignalized)
6. Dairy Farm Road / S.R. 2181 at Site Access 3 (unsignalized)
The intersections were analyzed during the AM (7-9 am) and PM (4-6 pm) peaks for the
following conditions:
• 2020 Existing Conditions
• 2024 Future No-Build Conditions • 2024 Full Build Conditions
• 2024 Full Build Conditions with Improvements (as necessary)
The Wilmington Urban Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) and NCDOT were
contacted to obtain background information and to ascertain the elements to be
covered in this Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA). The approved scope for this TIA is
included in the supporting documentation section of the appendix. Information regarding
the property was provided by HH Multi, LLC.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 4
FIGURE 1
CONCEPT PLAN
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 5
FIGURE 2A
SITE LOCATION MAP
SITE INDICATOR
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 6
FI
G
U
R
E
2
B
VI
C
I
N
I
T
Y
M
A
P
ST
U
D
Y
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
BA
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
SI
T
E
3
2
1
4
5
6
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
7
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 6
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Inventory
A field investigation was conducted by DAVENPORT staff to determine the existing
roadway conditions in the study area. Table 2.1 contains the results of this effort.
Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane geometry.
Table 2.1 - Street Inventory
Facility
Name Route # Typical Cross
Section
Pavement
Width
Speed
Limit Maintained By
N. College
Road US 117 2-lane
undivided Approx. 22’ 45 MPH NCDOT
Blue Clay
Road SR 1318 2-lane
undivided Approx. 20’ 55 MPH NCDOT
Sidbury Road
SR
1336/SR
1572
2-lane
undivided Approx. 22’ 55 MPH NCDOT
Dairy Farm
Road SR 2181 2-lane
undivided Approx. 20’ 55 MPH NCDOT
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 8
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 7
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by DAVENPORT staff. During
scope approval of the development, it was agreed upon to use data collected from the
Sidbury Farms Development that included similar intersections and to project the
volumes by 1% over one year. Table 2.2 contains the dates these counts were
collected. Schools were in session at the time of traffic counts. A system peak hour was
used for the traffic analysis. The peak hour occurred at approximately 7:15 to 8:15 AM,
and 4:15 to 5:15 PM. Figure 4 shows the 2020 base AM and PM peak hour volumes.
More information can be found in the Traffic Volume Data section of the appendix.
Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data
Count Location: Date Taken: By:
Blue Clay Road at N. College Road 9/24/2019 DAVENPORT
Sidbury Road at Blue Clay Road 9/24/2019 DAVENPORT
Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road 9/24/2019 DAVENPORT
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 9
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
Thi
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
clie
n
t
.
FIGURE3 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRY SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER2002182,900SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONTRAFFICMOVEMENTBLACK= EXISTINGROADWAYLEGEND
Sid
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
Dairy Farm Road
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Bl
u
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
15
0
'
125'
15
0
'
50
'
75'
250'
SP
E
E
D
LIM
I
T
45
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
55
SP
E
E
D
LIM
I
T
45
SP
E
E
D
LIM
I
T
55
SP
E
E
D
LIM
I
T
55
SPEED LIMIT55
5,
1
0
0
1,800
9,300 11,500
4,
2
0
0
2018 AADTXXXX
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
0
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
18
1
/
2
6
5
22
3
/
1
4
5
12
/
3
9
Th
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
cli
e
n
t
.
Sid
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
Dairy Farm Road
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
88
/
1
1
2
12
8
/
2
0
0
47
/
8
8
231 / 253
234 / 443
123 / 109
89 / 24
418 / 278
123 / 18
5 / 16
205 / 39842
8
/
2
5
6
18
/
2
2
21 / 15 13 / 4
40
/
2
1
5
12
7
/
1
9
1
33
0
/
1
8
0
21
/
2
0
16 / 15
148 / 76
SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONTRAFFICMOVEMENTBLACK= EXISTINGROADWAYLEGEND AM / PM PEAKS FIGURE4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
1
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 10
3.0 Approved Developments and Committed Improvements
3.1 Approved Developments
Approved developments are developments that have been recently approved in
the area, but not yet constructed. Per WMPO staff, there are three (3) approved
developments to be considered in this analysis.
The first is the Sidbury Road Development located across Sidbury Road between Edna
Buck Drive and Buck Drive. This development consists of 655 single family dwelling
units and 103 townhomes.
The second is the Cape Landing Development located west of Blue Clay Road and N.
College Road. This development consists of 126 single family homes to be built by
2021. However, 37 homes are currently built and occupied, so volumes were adjusted
accordingly based on the submitted TIA’s distribution.
The new trip generation and associated site trips figure can be found in the appendix
and in Figure A.
3.2 Committed Improvements
Committed Improvements are improvements that are planned by NCDOT, a local
municipality, or a developer in the area, but not yet constructed. Per NCDOT and
WMPO, there are a few committed improvements during the 2024 conditions in the
vicinity of this project.
Cape Landing committed improvements:
Blue Clay Road at N. College Road
• Extend the existing eastbound left turn lane to provide 150 feet of storage, and
appropriate full-width deceleration and taper. Provide permitted + protected
phasing on movement.
• Restripe northbound approach between the existing painted island, south of the
intersection, and the existing northbound left turn lane to provide a two-way-left—
turn-lane. Provide permitted + protected phasing on movement.
• Revise signal
Sidbury Road Development committed improvements were not included in the analysis
as the improvements were not associated with the study intersections.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 12
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 11
4.0 Methodology
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards
In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted
NCDOT standards. The following table contains a summary of the base assumptions:
Table 4.1 - Assumptions
Peak Hour Factor 0.90
Background Traffic Annual Growth Rate 1.0% per year for all roadways
Analysis Software Synchro/SimTraffic Version 10.0
Base Signal Timing/Phasing NCDOT
Lane widths 12-feet
Truck percentages 2%
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 13
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 12
5.0 Capacity Analysis
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria
The Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes a term
“level of service” to measure how traffic operates in intersections and on roadway
segments. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of service
“A” represents low-volume traffic operations and Level of Service “F” represents high-
volume, oversaturated traffic operations. Synchro Traffic Modeling software was used to
determine the level of service for studied intersections. Note for unsignalized
intersection analysis, the level of service noted is for the worst approach of the
intersection. This is typically the left turn movement for the side street approach, due to
the number of opposing movements. All worksheet reports from the analyses can be
found in the Appendix.
Table 5.1 – Highway Capacity Manual
Levels of Service and Control Delay Criteria
Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
Level of Service Control Delay Per
vehicle (sec) Level of Service Delay Range
(sec)
A ≤ 10 A ≤ 10
B > 10 and ≤ 20 B > 10 and ≤ 15
C > 20 and ≤ 35 C > 15 and ≤ 25
D > 35 and ≤ 55 D > 25 and ≤ 35
E > 55 and ≤ 80 E > 35 and ≤ 50
F > 80 F > 50
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 14
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 13
6.0 2024 Full Build Conditions
As discussed in the introduction, the full build consists of 320 single family homes to be
built by 2024.
6.1 Trip Generation
Trips for this development were projected based on the 10th Edition of ITE Trip
Generation Manual. Table 6.1 presents the results.
Table 6.1 - ITE Trip Generation
Sidbury Crossing
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Two-Way
Land Use ITE Land Code Size Data
Source Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit
Multifamily
Housing
(mid-rise)
221 320 Dwelling
Units
Adjacent
/Equation 1741 30 85 86 55
Total Trips 1,741 30 85 86 55
6.2 Trip Distribution
Site trips for this proposed development were distributed based on the existing traffic
patterns and engineering judgment. These distributions were reviewed and approved by
WMPO and is shown in Figure 5. The directional distributions for the full build site trips
are as follows:
• 40% to and from the west of Blue Clay Road
• 30% to and from the south of N. College Road
• 15% to and from the west of Sidbury Road
• 15% to and from the north of N. College Road
6.3 2024 Future No Build Traffic
The 2024 future no build traffic volumes were computed by applying a 1.0%
compounded annual growth rate to the 2020 base traffic volumes and adding approved
development trips. Figure 6 shows 2024 future no build traffic volumes for AM and PM
peaks.
6.4 2024 Full Build Total Traffic
The 2024 future build traffic volumes were obtained by summing the 2024 future no
build volumes and the full build site trips due to the proposed development. Full build
site trips are shown in Figure 7. The 2024 future build volumes are shown for AM and
PM peaks in Figure 8. More information can be found in the Traffic volume Data section
of the appendix.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 15
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION TRAFFICMOVEMENTROADWAYLEGEND BLACK= EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED DESTINATION NODE%IN = ENTERINGOUT = EXITING
Th
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
s
in
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.R
e
u
s
e
of
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
r
r
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
riz
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
l
i
e
n
t
.
FIGURE5TRIP DISTRIBUTION SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENTNEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218
Si
d
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
Da
i
r
y
F
a
r
m
R
o
a
d
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Bl
u
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
15%
40
%
30
%
15
%
40
%
I
N
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
1
30% IN
15% IN
30
%
O
U
T
40
%
O
U
T
15
%
O
U
T
85% IN
85
%
O
U
T
85% OUT
85
%
I
N
15
%
O
U
T
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
2
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
3
15
%
I
N
15% OUT
60%IN
40%IN
30%IN
10%IN
10%IN
60
%
O
U
T
30
%
O
U
T
10
%
O
U
T
10%OUT 40%OUT
15
%
I
N
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
6
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
20
4
/
2
8
8
25
9
/
2
1
4
31
/
5
4
Th
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
cli
e
n
t
.
Si
d
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
Dairy Farm Road
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
10
7
/
1
2
7
18
7
/
2
5
3
85
/
1
1
6
248 / 280
247 / 467
135 / 131
100 / 46
440 / 292
142 / 60
6 / 17
257 / 53555
3
/
3
4
3
20
/
2
4
23 / 16 14 / 5
43
/
2
2
7
17
5
/
3
1
7
45
0
/
2
6
3
23
/
2
2
17 / 16
157 / 80
SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONTRAFFICMOVEMENTROADWAYLEGENDFIGURE6 FUTURE NO BUILD VOLUMESBLACK= EXISTING AM / PM PEAKS
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
7
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
0
/
0
12
/
3
4
0
/
0
Th
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
cli
e
n
t
.
Sid
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
13
/
8
34
/
2
2
26
/
1
7
0 / 0
0 / 0
5 / 13
0 / 0
0 / 0
9 / 26
0 / 0
26 / 7372
/
4
7
0 /
0
0 / 0 0 / 0
26
/
7
3
0 /
0
0
/
0
5 /
1
3
13 / 8
72 / 47
SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218FIGURE7SITE TRIPS
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
1
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
2
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
3
Da
i
r
y
F
a
r
m
R
o
a
d
18 / 52 12 / 349 / 263 / 93 / 9
51
/
3
3
26
/
1
7
9 /
6
34 / 229 / 6
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTION TRAFFICMOVEMENTROADWAYLEGEND BLACK= EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED AM / PM PEAKS
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
8
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
20
4
/
2
8
8
27
1
/
2
4
8
31
/
5
4
Th
i
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
cli
e
n
t
.
Sid
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
12
0
/
1
3
5
22
1
/
2
7
5
11
1
/
1
3
3
248 / 280
247 / 467
140 / 144
100 / 46
440 / 292
151 / 86
6 / 17
283 / 60862
5
/
3
9
0
20
/
2
4
23 / 16 14 / 5
69
/
3
0
0
17
5
/
3
1
7
45
0
/
2
6
3
28
/
3
5
30 / 24
229 / 127
SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONTRAFFICMOVEMENTROADWAYLEGENDFIGURE82024 BUILD VOLUMES
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
1
Sit
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
2
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
3
Da
i
r
y
F
a
r
m
R
o
a
d
18 / 52 77 / 2819 / 26 68 / 256
3 / 9
51
/
3
3
26
/
1
7
9
/
6
207 / 118182 / 39
65 / 247
173 / 33
BLACK= EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED AM / PM PEAKS
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
1
9
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 18
6.5 Full Build Discussion of Results
The following section discusses 2024 full build level of service for each intersection.
Recommended improvements for full build are illustrated in Figure 9.
Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road
The unsignalized intersection currently operates at LOS B in the AM and PM peaks. In
2024 future no build conditions, LOS C is expected in the AM peak and LOS B in the
PM peak. In full build conditions, LOS C is expected in both the AM and PM peaks.
Though there is an existing eastbound left turn, based on the NCDOT Driveway Manual,
it is recommended to extend the eastbound left turn to 400 feet of storage with
appropriate taper.
Table 6.2 - Dairy Farm Road at Sidbury Road
Scenario Overall LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Westbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
Existing B (12.9)
SB Approach
A (8.2) - (-) - (-) - (-) B (12.9)
A (2) A (0) B (12.9)
2024 No Build C (15.7)
SB Approach
A (8.6) - (-) - (-) - (-) C (15.7)
A (1.7) A (0) C (15.7)
2024 Build C (20.9)
SB Approach
A (8.8) - (-) - (-) - (-) C (20.9)
A (2.5) A (0) C (20.9)
2024 Build +
Imp
C (16.9)
SB Approach
A (8.8) - (-) - (-) - (-) C (18.4) C (16.7)
A (2.5) A (0) C (16.9)
PM Peak Hour
Existing B (12.2)
SB Approach
A (8.2) - (-) - (-) - (-) B (12.2)
A (4.4) A (0) B (12.2)
2024 No Build B (14.7)
SB Approach
A (8.6) - (-) - (-) - (-) B (14.7)
A (3.6) A (0) B (14.7)
2024 Build C (19.6)
SB Approach
A (9) - (-) - (-) - (-) C (19.6)
A (4.4) A (0) C (19.6)
2024 Build +
Imp
C (15.9)
SB Approach
A (9) - (-) - (-) - (-) E (41.4) B (11.1)
A (4.4) A (0) C (15.9)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 20
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 19
Blue Clay Road at Sidbury Road
This unsignalized intersection currently operated at LOS C in the AM peak and LOS B
in the PM peak. In 2024 future no build conditions, LOS D is expected in the AM peak
and LOS C in the PM peak. In full build conditions, LOS E is expected in the AM peak
and LOS D in the PM peak. While a drop in LOS is not ideal, this is typical for a stop-
controlled intersection of this nature (northbound and westbound being the major
approach). The delay is expected to be short-lived. It is recommended to convert this
intersection into an all-way stop control. This improvement will decrease the queues at
this intersection.
Note, these improvements are not solely the responsibility of the developer and were
offered as potential interim intersection improvements and NCDOT will need to further
investigate mitigations for future traffic capacity issues.
Table 6.3 - Blue Clay Road at Sidbury Road
Scenario Overall LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Westbound Northbound Southbound Northbound
L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
Existing
C (16.5)
WB
Approach
C (16.5) - (-) - (-) A (7.7) A (0)
C (16.5) A (0) A (4.8)
2024 No
Build
D (29.3)
WB
Approach
D (29.3) - (-) - (-) A (7.9) A (0)
D (29.3) A (0) A (4.9)
2024
Build
E (48.1)
WB
Approach
E (48.1) - (-) - (-) A (8) A (0)
E (48.1) A (0) A (5)
2024
Build +
Imp
F (62.8)
WB
Approach
F (62.8) B (13.2) - (-) B (10.2)
F (62.8) B (13.2) B (10.2)
PM Peak Hour
Existing
B (13.9)
WB
Approach
B (13.9) - (-) - (-) A (8.3) A (0)
B (13.9) A (0) A (6.6)
2024 No
Build
C (20.4)
WB
Approach
C (20.4) - (-) - (-) A (8.8) A (0)
C (20.4) A (0) A (6.7)
2024
Build
D (28)
WB
Approach
D (28) - (-) - (-) A (9.1) A (0)
D (28) A (0) A (6.9)
2024
Build +
Imp
E (40.4)
NB
Approach
D (25.2) E (40.4) - (-) A (10.0)
D (25.2) E (40.4) A (10.0)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 21
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 20
N. College Road at Blue Clay Road
This signalized intersection currently operates at LOS C in the AM peak and LOS D in
the PM peak. In 2024 future no build conditions, LOS E is expected in the AM peak and
LOS F in the PM peak. In full build conditions, the level of services is expected to
remain the same. To address the queuing issue at this signal, it is recommended to
construct a westbound right turn lane of 150 feet of storage and appropriate taper and
revise the signal to accommodate the additional traffic.
Note, these improvements are not solely the responsibility of the developer and were
offered as potential interim intersection improvements and NCDOT will need to further
investigate mitigations for future traffic capacity issues.
Table 6.4 - North College Road at Blue Clay Road
Scenario Overall
LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
Existing C (28)
D (47.1) C (34.5) B (18.1) C (20) D (45.3) C (34.6) A (8.7) B (19.8) B (19.9)
D (40) B (19.7) C (31) B (19.8)
2024 No
Build E (61.4)
F
(216.9)
D
(53.4) D
(53.9)
E
(56.4) E
(61.8)
D
(40.9)
A
(9.4)
D
(49.9)
D
(42.3)
F (121) E (55.9) D (37.4) D (43.9)
2024 Build E (65)
F
(220)
E
(58.6) E
(59.8)
E
(74.1) E
(62.2)
D
(41.1)
A
(9.4)
D
(51.3)
D
(42.6)
F (123.8) E (70.6) D (37.2) D (44.5)
2024 Build
+ Imp E (58.6)
F
(220)
E
(58.6) E
(59.8) D (41) B
(13.1)
E
(62.2)
D
(41.1)
A
(9.4)
D
(51.3)
D
(42.6)
F (123.8) D (38.2) D (37.2) D (44.5)
PM Peak Hour
Existing D (49)
F
(167.6)
D
(37.2) C
(22.8)
C
(26.4) D
(38)
C
(34.7)
A
(9.2)
B
(13.9)
C
(33)
F (114.2) C (25.6) C (33.5) C (30.4)
2024 No
Build F (145)
F
(615.4)
F
(85.6) F
(93.4)
F
(185.8) E
(66.7)
D
(53.6)
B
(17.3)
C
(30.8)
D
(43.2)
F (359.9) F (164.2) D (49.6) D (41.4)
2024 Build F (164.8)
F
(713.6)
F
(110.4) F
(114.7)
F
(225.1) E
(70.1)
D
(53.6)
B
(17.7)
C
(31.2)
D
(43.2)
F (404.6) F (198) D (48.1) D (41.3)
2024 Build
+ Imp F (136.2)
F
(713.6)
F
(110.4) F
(114.7)
E
(75.9)
A
(9.4)
E
(70.1)
D
(53.6)
B
(17.7)
C
(31.2)
D
(43.2)
F (404.6) E (68.9) D (48.1) D (41.3)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 22
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 21
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 1
This site access is proposed to be a full movement configuration. In 2024 future build
conditions, LOS A is expected for both the AM and PM peaks. Based on NCDOT
Driveway Manual, this intersection will not warrant auxiliary lanes. Therefore, no
improvements are recommended for this intersection. Design site access according to
NCDOT standards.
Table 6.5 - Old Dairy Road at Site Access 1
Scenario Overall LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
2024 Build A (9.8)
EB Approach
A (9.8) A (7.7) A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (9.8) A (1.5) A (0)
PM Peak Hour
2024 Build A (9.1)
EB Approach
A (9.1) A (7.6) A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (9.1) A (1.2) A (0)
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 2
This site access is proposed to be a full movement configuration. In 2024 future build
conditions, LOS A is expected for both the AM and PM peaks. Based on NCDOT
Driveway Manual, this intersection will not warrant auxiliary lanes. Therefore, no
improvements are recommended for this intersection. Design site access according to
NCDOT standards.
Table 6.6 - Old Dairy Road at Site Access 2
Scenario Overall
LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
2024 Build
A (9.4)
EB
Approach
A
(9.4) A
(7.6)
A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (9.4) A (0.9) A (0)
PM Peak Hour
2024 Build
A (8.6)
EB
Approach
A
(8.6) A
(7.3)
A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (8.6) A (0.7) A (0)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 23
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 22
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 3
This site access is proposed to be a full movement configuration. In 2024 future build
conditions, LOS A is expected for both the AM and PM peaks. Based on NCDOT
Driveway Manual, this intersection will not warrant auxiliary lanes. Therefore, no
improvements are recommended for this intersection. Design site access according to
NCDOT standards.
Table 6.7 - Old Dairy Road at Site Access 3
Scenario Overall
LOS
Level of Service by Approach
(Delay in sec/veh)
Eastbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R
AM Peak Hour
2024 Build
A (9.3)
EB
Approach
A
(9.3) A
(7.6)
A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (9.3) A (0.3) A (0)
PM Peak Hour
2024 Build
A (8.5)
EB
Approach
A
(8.5) A
(7.3)
A
(0) - (-) - (-)
A (8.5) A (0.3) A (0)
6.6 Full Build Recommended Improvements
The recommended improvements for full build are listed below:
Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road
• Extend eastbound left turn lane to 400 feet of storage and appropriate taper
Blue Clay Road at Sidbury Road
• Convert intersection to an all-way stop control
N. College Road at Blue Clay Road
• Provide a westbound right turn lane with 150 feet storage and appropriate taper
• Revise signal
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 1
• Design site access according to NCDOT standards.
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 2
• Design site access according to NCDOT standards.
Dairy Farm Road at Site Access 3
• Design site access according to NCDOT standards.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 24
**
*
N
O
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
*
*
*
Thi
s
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
i
si
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
i
t
w
a
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
p
e
rr
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
,
t
h
i
s
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
D
A
V
E
N
PO
R
T
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lia
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
D
A
V
E
N
P
O
R
T
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
AV
E
N
P
O
R
T
a
n
d
t
h
e
clie
n
t
.
FIGURE9 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS SIDBURYCROSSINGDEVELOPMENT NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NC PROJECTNUMBER200218SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONTRAFFICMOVEMENTBLACK= EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED GREEN= COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTSROADWAYLEGEND
Sid
b
u
r
y
Ro
a
d
Dairy Farm Road
N College
Road
N College
Road
Blue Clay Road
Bl
u
e
C
l
a
y
Ro
a
d
40
0
'
125'
15
0
'
15
0
'
100'
250'
MO
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
Co
n
v
e
r
t
t
o
a
n
a
l
l
-
w
a
y
s
t
o
p
co
n
t
r
o
l
.
15
0
'
150'
SIG
N
A
L
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
Wit
h
t
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
t
u
r
n
la
n
e
,
i
t
i
s
a
l
s
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
t
o
mo
d
i
f
y
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
1
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
2
Si
t
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
3
~3
,77
5
'
~1
,37
5
'
~650'~950'
~950'
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
1
-
9
-
2
5
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 24
7.0 Queue Results
Below in Tables 7.1-7.4 are the queue results for all exclusive turn lanes.
Table 7.1 - Queue Results
AM Peak Hour Queues
Scenario Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm
Road
Blue Clay Road &
Sidbury Road N College Road & Blue Clay Road
2020 Existing EBL WBTR 0 SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL 0 WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 25 51 136 25 100 607 199 283 125 253 70 174 272
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 17 52 116 15 123 382 90 189 119 223 51 120 217
Storage Bay (ft) 150 50 150 75 250 125
2024 Future No
Build EBL WBTR SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 31 92 276 25 200 2903 200 387 100 580 400 174 402
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 30 66 210 14 224 3569 216 341 112 487 292 208 396
Storage Bay (ft) 150 150 150 100 250 125
2024 Build EBL WBTR SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 53 21 115 314 53 200 2866 200 562 150 486 400 174 440
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 38 7 103 232 27 215 3267 252 527 189 421 264 206 404
Storage Bay (ft) 150 150 150 100 250 125
2024 Build + Imps EBL WBTR SBL SBR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 31 22 74 104 162 92 72 200 1841 128 177 195 150 439 400 175 408
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 35 7 44 82 154 73 43 200 1957 112 157 106 185 323 213 225 368
Storage Bay (ft) 400 150 150 150 150 100 250 125
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 26
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 25
Table 7.2 - Queue Results
PM Peak Hour Queues
Scenario Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm
Road
Blue Clay Road &
Sidbury Road N College Road & Blue Clay Road
2020 Existing EBL WBTR 0 SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL 0 WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 54 22 66 161 27 100 2866 200 372 60 202 24 175 362
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 54 7 52 115 24 100 2952 114 260 43 156 8 200 370
Storage Bay (ft) 150 50 150 75 250 125
2024 Future No
Build EBL WBTR SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 53 51 133 48 200 2890 200 1287 100 482 49 174 659
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 54 42 108 21 201 3417 260 1297 97 361 29 190 621
Storage Bay (ft) 150 150 150 100 250 125
2024 Build EBL WBTR SBLR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBTR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 143 70 1019 22 29 200 2885 200 1314 150 444 400 175 594
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 84 61 869 9 25 200 3650 270 1567 94 355 212 212 535
Storage Bay (ft) 150 150 150 100 250 125
2024 Build + Imps EBL SBL SBR WBLR NBTR SBLT EBL EBTR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTR
Max Queue (ft) 75 30 45 66 116 114 30 200 2885 200 775 200 149 578 400 175 556
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 73 10 35 45 104 117 33 203 3697 211 678 228 104 399 152 209 506
Storage Bay (ft) 400 150 150 150 150 100 250 125
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 27
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 26
Table 7.3 - Queue Results
AM Peak Hour Queues
Scenario Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 1 Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 2 Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 3
2024 Build EBLR NBLT EBLR NBLT EBLR NBLT
Max Queue (ft) 42 26 66 20
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 38 15 53 17
Storage Bay (ft)
Table 7.4 - Queue Results
PM Peak Hour Queues
Scenario Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 1 Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 2 Dairy Farm Road & Site Access 3
2024 Build EBLR NBLT EBLR NBLT EBLR NBLT
Max Queue (ft) 42 52 24 18 25
95th Percentile
Queue (ft) 38 39 12 13 8
Storage Bay (ft)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 28
6/26/2020 Sidbury Crossing – Transportation Impact Analysis 27
8.0 Summary and Conclusion
The proposed Sidbury Crossing is to be located across Sidbury Road between I-40 and
Dairy Farm Road in New Hanover County, North Carolina. The development will utilize
three (3) site accesses. All three site accesses are proposed to be full access with each
located on Dairy Farm Road between Sidbury Road and Blue Clay Road.
The Sidbury Crossing will be analyzed for one (1) full build:
• Full Build will consist of 320 apartment dwelling units. The build year for Full
Build is assumed to be 2024.
Full Build’s trip generation indicates that the proposed development is expected to
generate 115 trips in the AM peak, and 141 trips in the PM peak.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this
development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to
accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic.
Based on the analysis of the development there were a couple intersections that
operated below the ideal level of service. Note, these improvements are not solely the
responsibility of the developer and were offered as potential interim intersection
improvements and NCDOT will need to further investigate mitigations for future traffic
capacity issues.
The recommended improvements at the study intersections are summarized in Table
8.1 below.
Table 8.1 – Recommended Improvement Summary
Intersection 2024 Full Build
Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm
Road
• Extend eastbound left turn lane to 400 feet of storage
and appropriate taper
Sidbury Road at Blue Clay
Road • Convert intersection to an all-way stop control
Blue Clay Road at N. College
Road
• Provide a westbound right turn lane with 150 feet
storage and appropriate taper
• Revise signal
Dairy Farm Road at Site
Access 1 • Design site access according to NCDOT standards
Dairy Farm Road at Site
Access 2 • Design site access according to NCDOT standards
Dairy Farm Road at Site
Access 3 • Design site access according to NCDOT standards
In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of both background traffic and
proposed development traffic and has provided recommendations to accommodate
future traffic. Please note the proposed site access should be designed according to
NCDOT standards.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 29
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 10 - 1
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
WWW
W
W
DO
G
PA
R
K
STORMWATERPOND1.61 AC DOGPARK
WE
T
L
A
N
D
,
TY
P
.
W
W
W
WWWW
W
W
W
W
W W W W W W WWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
X X X X XXXXXX8392ARCHCLIMBER4'5'1-8507 POSTS2-8548 DECKS8226TIC TAC TOE8365ESTRAIGHT BRIDGE8442VERTICAL LADDER 8478PSLIDE
XX
X
X X X
X
W.H.F
F
F
FF GAS EASE
M
E
N
T
5
0
'
R
/
W
DB: 52
4
9
,
P
G
3
2
2
GAS EASEMENT 50' R/W DB: 5249, PG 322
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
TV
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
WET WET WET WET WETWET WET WET WET WET WETWET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET WET WET WET
WE
T
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WETWETWET
WE
T
W
E
T
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WE
T
WE
T
WE
T
WE
T
100-YR
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
100-YR 100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR 100-YR 100-YR100-YR100-YR 100-YR 100-YR
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100-Y
R
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
100-YR
1
0
0
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
100-Y
R 100-YR
100-Y
R
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
100-Y
R
100-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR500-YR 500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR 500-YR 500-YR500-YR500-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
500-YR 500-Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
500-YR
500-
Y
R
500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR 500
-
Y
R
500-YR 500-Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR
1
0
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR
100
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
5
0
0
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
500-
Y
R
500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
500-Y
R
500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR
500-YR
500-YR
500-YR
500-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
500-
Y
R
500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
500-Y
R
500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
5
0
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
5
0
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR
500
-
Y
R
500-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R500-YR
500-YR
500
-
Y
R
500
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR 500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
50
0
-
Y
R
100-YR100-YR 100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR
100-YR100-YR100-YR
100-YR100-YR100-YR
100-Y
R
100-Y
R100-YR100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR 100-YR 100-YR
100-YR
100-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
1
0
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100-Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
100-YR
100-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100
-
Y
R
100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR 100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR100-YR
100
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
10
0
-
Y
R
500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR 500-YR 500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR500-YR
10
0
-
Y
R
100-
Y
R
UTILITY EASEMENT DB: 1859, PG 297
TV
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
57 575656565555555454545453535353525252525251515151515050505050494949494948484848484847474747474746464646464645454545454545444444444444444343434343434342424242424242424141414141414141404040404040404039393939393939393838383838383838383737373737373737373636363636363636363635353535353535353535 34343434343434343434343433333333333333333333333333333333323232323232323232323232323232323232
32
32 3131 31 31313131313131313131313131 31 31 313131313131
31
31
31
30 303030303030303030303030
30
30
30
30
30
30
3030303030 30303030303030303030303030303030303029
29
29
29 292929 29 2929
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
2929292929 2929292929292929292929292929292929292929292929292929292929292929292929
29
29
29
282828 282828
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
282828282828282828
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
2828282828 2828282828282828282828282828282828282828282828282828282828282828282828
28
28
28
28
28
27 27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
2727
27
27272727272727272727272727
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 2727 27 27 27 27 272727272727
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
272727272727272727272727272727 27 2727
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26 26
26
2626262626262626262626 26 262626
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
2626262626262626262626262626 262626 26 26 26 26 2626 26 26 26 26 26 262626
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
262626 26 26 26262626
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
25 25
2525
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
2
5
25252525252525252525252525252525 25 25 252525252525252525252525252525252525
25
25
25
25 25 25 252525
25
25
25
25
25
25 25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
252525 252525
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
24242424242424 242424242424242424
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
2
4
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24 24 2424242424
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
232323232323 232323232323
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23 23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
2222 222222222222
22
22
22 22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
212121 21
21
4'
W
I
R
E
F
R
E
N
C
E
4'
W
I
R
E
F
R
E
N
C
E
4'
W
I
R
E
F
R
E
N
C
E
4'
W
I
R
E
F
R
E
N
C
E
4' WIRE FRENCE
1800-0
0
3
-
0
0
8
-
0
0
0
ANTHO
N
Y
T
U
C
K
E
R
ZONE
D
:
R
-
1
5
D.B. 59
9
2
,
P
G
.
2
6
2
4
CP&L POWER LIN
E
R
/
W
XWETLAND,TYP.
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
PO
N
D
1.
0
7
A
C
Bldg 15
Type B-3
12 Unit
B
l
d
g
8
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(
2
4
U
n
i
t
)
Bldg 10 - Type B-1
(24 Unit)
Bldg 6Type B-312 Unit
Bldg 11
Type B-3
12 Unit
Bl
d
g
1
4
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(2
4
U
n
i
t
)
Bl
d
g
1
2
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(2
4
U
n
i
t
)
G-4
(
9
-
U
N
I
T
)
Bl
d
g
1
3
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
2
(2
4
U
n
i
t
)
Bl
d
g
9
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(2
4
U
n
i
t
)
B
l
d
g
7
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(
2
4
U
n
i
t
)
Bldg 1 - Type B-1 (24 Unit)
G-
6
(
7
-
U
N
I
T
)
G-1 (7-UNIT)G-2
(
1
1
-
U
N
I
T
)
G-
3
(
1
1
-
U
N
I
T
/
2
BA
Y
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
)
Bl
d
g
4
-
T
y
p
e
B
-
1
(2
4
U
n
i
t
)
Bldg 3Type B-312 UnitBldg 2Type B-312 Unit
Bl
d
g
5
Ty
p
e
B
-
3
12
U
n
i
t
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
SS
SS
S
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXSSSSSSFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFMFM
SSSSSS
SS
S
S
S
S
SSSSSSW
W
W
15
0
'
P
O
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
35
'
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
30' SIDE STREET SETBACK
30
'
S
I
D
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
G-
5
(
1
1
-
U
N
I
T
)
20
'
W
I
D
E
B
U
F
F
E
R
10
'
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
30
'
S
I
D
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
2
0
'
W
I
D
E
B
U
F
F
E
R
/
S
I
D
E
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
WET
WE
T
W
E
T WET
W
E
T
WET
WE
T
WE
TWET
WET
WE
T WET
WET
W
E
T
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WE
T
WET
WE
T
WE
T
DATE:
SCALE:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
PE
I
J
O
B
#
:
CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT:
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT:
FINAL DESIGN:
RELEASED FOR CONST:
PROJECT STATUS REVISIONS:
DRAWING INFORMATION
SE
A
L
CLIENT INFORMATION:
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
(910) 791-6707 (O) (910) 791-6760 (F)
NC License #: C-2846
1" = 100'
6/29/2020
NORTH CAROLINA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
SIDBURY CROSSING
CONDITIONAL ZONING SITE PLANLP
-
1
20
2
1
1
.
P
E
HH MULTI, LLC.
2919 BREEZEWOOD AVE, SUITE 400
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303
PRELIMINARY DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
SITE DATAPARCEL ID:R01800-003-012-001CURRENT ZONING:R-15PROPOSED ZONING:RMF-LPROPOSED USE:MULTI-FAMILYPROJECT SITE AREA:+ 31.12 ACOWNER INFORMATION:DESIRABLE PROPERTIES LLC 341 NORTH GREEN MEADOWS DR
I
V
E
,
S
U
I
T
E
1
0
0
WILMINGTON, NC 28405FLOOD INFORMATION:THIS PARCEL CONTAINS AREAS L
O
C
A
T
E
D
I
N
F
L
O
O
D
ZONE "AE" WITH A BFE OF 31.7' A
S
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
D
B
Y
F
E
M
A
FLOOD PANEL 3720324100K DATE
D
A
U
G
U
S
T
2
8
,
2
0
1
8
.
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:COMMUNITY MIXED USE & GENER
A
L
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
RMF-L ALLOWABLE DENSITY:10 DU/AC (311 UNITS)PROJECT PROPOSED DENSITY:9.25 DU/AC (288 UNITS)PROPOSED UNITSPROPOSED UNITS:288 UNITS(96) 1-BED UNITS(144) 2-BED UNITS(48) 3-BED UNITSDIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTSFRONT SETBACK: 35'REAR SETBACK:25'SIDE SETBACK:20' INTERIOR30' SIDE STREETBUILDING SEPARATION:20'MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT:45' (3 STORIES)
N
O
R
T
H
0SC
A
L
E
:
10
0
20
0
30
0
1"
=
1
0
0
'
fe
e
t
PROPOSED 30'
A
C
C
E
S
S
& UTILITY EASE
M
E
N
T
SU
R
V
E
Y
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
N
O
T
E
S
:
1.
RE
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
D
E
E
D
B
O
O
K
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
O
N
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
P
L
A
N
.
2.
UT
I
L
I
T
E
S
S
H
O
W
N
H
E
R
E
O
N
A
R
E
F
R
O
M
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
V
I
S
I
B
L
E
I
N
T
H
E
F
I
E
L
D
A
N
D
M
A
P
S
PR
O
V
I
D
E
D
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
S
.
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
O
T
H
E
R
T
H
A
N
W
H
A
T
A
R
E
S
H
O
W
N
M
A
Y
E
X
I
S
T
.
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
UN
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
A
R
E
A
P
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
.
3.
WA
T
E
R
A
N
D
S
E
W
E
R
W
I
L
L
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
B
Y
C
F
P
U
A
.
SI
T
E
D
A
T
A
(
C
O
N
T
'
D
)
SI
T
E
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
:
1.
AL
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
N
D
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
W
I
L
L
B
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
E
D
A
N
D
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
B
Y
D
U
K
E
EN
E
R
G
Y
.
2.
AL
L
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
O
N
A
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
E
D
A
N
D
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
B
Y
BU
I
L
D
E
R
.
3.
LI
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
S
T
.
B
.
D
.
SI
T
E
D
A
T
A
(
C
O
N
T
'
D
)
PA
R
K
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
SE
C
8
1
-
1
:
M
U
L
T
I
-
F
A
M
I
L
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
:
O
N
E
A
N
D
O
N
E
-
H
A
L
F
(
1
.
5
)
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
UN
I
T
A
N
D
T
W
O
(
2
.
0
)
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
2
+
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
.
PA
R
K
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
:
52
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
1-
B
E
D
U
N
I
T
14
4
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
9
6
U
N
I
T
S
*
1
.
5
S
P
A
C
E
S
/
U
N
I
T
)
2-
B
E
D
U
N
I
T
28
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
1
4
4
U
N
I
T
S
*
2
S
P
A
C
E
S
/
U
N
I
T
)
3
-
B
E
D
U
N
I
T
96
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
4
8
U
N
I
T
S
*
2
S
P
A
C
E
S
/
U
N
I
T
)
PA
R
K
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
:
52
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
A
D
A
A
N
D
G
A
R
A
G
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
)
SU
R
F
A
C
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
:
47
2
S
P
A
C
E
S
G
A
R
A
G
E
S
:
56
S
P
A
C
E
S
SE
C
8
1
-
1
:
C
L
U
B
S
,
P
U
B
L
I
C
,
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
,
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
U
S
E
S
:
O
N
E
(
1
)
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
F
O
R
EA
C
H
O
N
E
H
U
N
D
R
E
D
(
1
0
0
)
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
E
E
T
O
F
G
R
O
S
S
F
L
O
O
R
S
P
A
C
E
.
PA
R
K
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
R
E
D
:
50
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
5
,
0
0
0
S
F
C
L
U
B
H
O
U
S
E
/
1
0
0
S
F
)
PA
R
K
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
:
50
S
P
A
C
E
S
TO
T
A
L
A
D
A
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
:
11
S
P
A
C
E
S
TO
A
T
L
A
D
A
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
:
14
S
P
A
C
E
S
TO
T
A
L
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
:
57
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
TO
T
A
L
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
:
57
8
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
I
N
C
L
U
D
E
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
,
G
A
R
A
G
E
S
,
A
N
D
AD
A
S
P
A
C
E
S
)
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
:
OP
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
:
6.
2
2
A
C
(
2
0
%
O
F
G
R
O
S
S
A
C
R
E
A
G
E
)
PR
O
V
I
D
E
D
:
+ 1
0
.
7
0
A
C
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
4
0
PU
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
(
W
I
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
)
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
.
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
(
1
7
0
'
W
I
D
T
H
)
SIDBURY RD.PUBLIC ROW (WIDTH VARIES)
AP
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
GR
A
V
I
T
Y
S
E
W
E
R
M
H
(T
Y
P
.
)
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
I
R
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
,
TY
P
.
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
8
"
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
,
T
Y
P
.
;
T
O
T
I
E
TO
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
WI
T
H
I
N
D
A
I
R
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
.
R
O
W
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
E
M
A
I
N
,
T
Y
P
.
CLUB HOUSE W/ MAILFACILITY5,000 SF PROPOSED PUMP STATION
AP
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
,
T
Y
P
.
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
8
"
GR
A
V
I
T
Y
S
E
W
E
R
,
T
Y
P
.
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
B
L
O
W
-
O
F
F
VA
L
V
E
,
T
Y
P
.
5'
W
I
D
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
,
T
Y
P
.
GA
R
A
G
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
,
TY
P
.
20
'
V
O
L
U
N
T
A
R
Y
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
B
U
F
F
E
R
POOL, POOL HOUSE ANDFIRE PIT DESIGNATED
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
FOR CLUB HO
U
S
E
U
S
E
FLOODWAY
F
L
O
O
D
Z
O
N
E
A
E
3
1
.
7
F
L
O
O
D
Z
O
N
E
"
X
"
F
L
O
O
D
Z
O
N
E
AE
3
1
.
7
FL
O
O
D
ZO
N
E
"
X
"
VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALENORTH U.S. INTERSTATE 40SIDBURY RDBLUE CLAY RDNC HWY 117U.S. INTERSTATE 140 DAIRY FARM RDSITE
TR
E
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
N
O
T
E
S
:
1.
A
S
I
T
E
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
W
A
S
M
A
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
E
D
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
.
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
S
I
S
T
S
P
R
I
M
A
R
I
L
Y
O
F
2
"
-
8
"
P
I
N
E
S
W
I
T
H
S
C
R
U
B
U
N
D
E
R
S
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
S
O
M
E
1
"
-
5
"
SW
E
E
T
G
U
M
S
A
N
D
R
E
D
M
A
P
L
E
S
.
F
L
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
A
N
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
R
E
A
S
S
H
O
W
E
D
T
H
E
M
O
S
T
DI
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
W
I
T
H
B
A
L
D
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
,
S
W
E
E
T
B
A
Y
M
A
G
N
O
L
I
A
S
,
W
A
X
M
Y
R
T
L
E
,
A
N
D
C
H
E
R
R
Y
LA
U
R
E
L
S
(
N
O
N
E
O
B
S
E
R
V
E
D
O
F
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
E
D
S
I
Z
E
)
.
A
F
E
W
1
0
"
-
1
2
"
P
I
N
E
S
E
X
I
S
T
E
D
I
N
B
U
F
F
E
R
AR
E
A
S
.
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
M
O
S
T
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
O
F
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
E
D
A
F
E
W
2
"
-
3
"
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
S
.
N
O
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
S
W
E
R
E
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
E
D
O
N
S
I
T
E
.
2.
VE
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
I
N
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
S
,
B
U
F
F
E
R
S
,
A
N
D
F
L
O
O
D
W
A
Y
S
A
R
E
I
N
T
E
N
D
E
D
T
O
R
E
M
A
I
N
W
I
T
H
SE
L
E
C
T
I
V
E
C
L
E
A
R
I
N
G
O
F
D
E
A
D
/
D
I
S
E
A
S
E
D
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
A
N
D
D
E
B
R
I
S
.
3.
NO
S
I
G
N
I
F
I
C
A
N
T
O
R
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E
T
R
E
E
S
W
E
R
E
O
B
S
E
R
V
E
D
O
N
S
I
T
E
.
I
F
A
N
Y
A
R
E
F
O
U
N
D
W
I
T
H
AD
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
S
U
R
V
E
Y
W
O
R
K
,
T
H
E
Y
W
I
L
L
B
E
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
E
D
A
N
D
W
I
L
L
B
E
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
W
H
E
N
PO
S
S
I
B
L
E
.
4.
A
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
E
D
T
R
E
E
S
U
R
V
E
Y
W
I
L
L
B
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
E
D
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
E
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
E
R
M
I
T
T
I
N
G
.
5.
MA
X
I
M
U
M
E
F
F
O
R
T
W
I
L
L
B
E
M
A
D
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
E
D
T
R
E
E
S
.
RE
M
O
V
A
L
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
O
N
L
Y
T
O
W
H
A
T
I
S
N
E
C
E
S
S
A
R
Y
F
O
R
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
F
O
O
T
P
R
I
N
T
S
,
PA
R
K
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
S
,
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
P
O
N
D
S
,
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
E
S
S
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
I
T
E
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
.
REV. 1 REVISE PLANS PER PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS 07/24/20
WE
T
L
A
N
D
R
E
M
A
I
N
I
N
G
UN
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
:
0
.
9
6
A
C
WE
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
(
T
H
I
S
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
)
:
0
.
0
9
A
C
WE
T
L
A
N
D
R
E
M
A
I
N
I
N
G
UN
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
:
1
.
6
4
A
C
WE
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
(
T
H
I
S
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
)
:
0
.
1
6
A
C
WE
T
L
A
N
D
R
E
M
A
I
N
I
N
G
UN
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
:
0
.
4
0
A
C
FL
O
O
D
P
L
A
I
N
/
U
N
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
N
D
:
1
.
4
7
A
C
FL
O
O
D
W
A
Y
(
A
L
L
U
N
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
)
:
1
.
9
8
A
C
RE
M
A
I
N
I
N
G
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
A
R
E
A
:
2
4
.
1
7
A
C
;
IN
C
L
U
D
E
S
O
P
E
N
S
P
A
C
E
,
B
U
F
F
E
R
S
,
P
O
N
D
S
,
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
,
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
,
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
NA
T
U
R
A
L
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
S
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
SC
A
L
E
:
1
"
=
3
0
0
'
20
'
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
E
D
BU
F
F
E
R
AREA LEFT VEGETATED ASBUFFER TO FLOODWAYPlanning Board - September 3, 2020ITEM: 1- 11 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 9/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Gideon Smith
CONTACT(S): Gideon Smith, Current Planner, Brad Schuler, Senior Planner, Wayne Clark, Planning and Land
Use Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z20-15) – Request by Design Solu6ons on behalf of the property owner, Redland Development
Incorporated, to rezone approximately 7.15 acres of land located at 8814 Market Street (Hwy 17), north of Futch
Creek Road, from R-15, Residen6al District, and B-1, Neighborhood Business, to (CZD) RMF-L, Condi6onal
Residen6al Mul6-Family Low Density District, and (CZD) CB, Condi6onal Community Business District, in order to
construct a 60-unit townhome development and an 8,000 square foot retail/office/personal service building.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 7.15 acres from R-15 (approximately 6.07 acres) and B-1
(approximately 1.08 acres) to (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB to construct a 60-unit townhome development and a
mixture of retail sales, office, and personal services in an 8,000 square foot building. As proposed, the RMF-L por6on
of the site would be 6.11 acres and the CB por6on would be 1.04 acres.
The conceptual plan indicates there will be nine groups of townhomes with three buildings containing nine units each
(27 total units), one building containing eight units (8 total units), and five buildings containing five units each (25 total
units) for a total of 60 units. Each of the townhome buildings will be two-stories and limited to 35 feet in height. The
commercial component of this proposal will be a two-story/8,000 square foot retail sales/office/personal services
building and will share access with the residen6al por6on of the site, as well as the Benjamin Moore Paint commercial
development to the north.
The por6on of the site currently zoned R-15 would be permi>ed a maximum of 15 dwelling units, which is es6mated to
generate about 16 trips in both the AM and PM peak hours. Under the proposed RMF-L zoning, 60 townhomes could
be constructed on the site, which is es6mated to generate about 30 trips in the AM and 38 trips in the PM peak hours.
The expected net difference in traffic associated with residen6al development would be an increase of 14 AM and 22
PM peak trips when compared to current zoning.
If the B-1 por6on of the site was developed with a typical approximate 25% building footprint, an 11,000 square foot
shopping center or comparable development could be built and is es6mated to generate about 158 AM and 106 PM
peak hours. Under the proposed CB zoning, 4,000 square feet of retail and 4,000 square feet of office/personal
services is es6mated to generate about 25 AM trips and 32 PM trips in the peak hours. The expected net difference in
traffic associated with commercial development would be a decrease of 133 AM and 74 peak trips when compared to
current zoning.
The total trips es6mated to be generated from the site as currently zoned is about 174 in the AM peak and 122 in the
PM peak hours. This proposed townhome development and retail/office/personal services building is es6mated to
generate about 55 trips in the AM peak and 70 trip in the PM peak. When comparing the proposed rezoning to the
current zoning, the cumula6ve impact is expected to decrease traffic by 119 trips in the AM and 52 trips in the PM
peak.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
Access is provided to the subject property by US 17, just north of Futch Creek Road. As proposed, the commercial and
residen6al uses will share one driveway off US 17. Preliminary NCDOT comments indicate a right turn lane will be
required and specific details will be determined during the driveway permiEng process. In addi6on, the applicant has
agreed to connect the proposed commercial parking lot to the exis6ng commercial lot to the north (Benjamin Moore
Paint).
The recently approved nearby development, The Oaks at Murray Farms, completed a Traffic Impact Analysis which
studied the intersec6ons of "Old" Market Street/Futch Creek Road at US Hwy 17 and the nearby u-turn on US Hwy 17
to the north. This analysis generally indicates capacity is available at these intersec6ons and the proposed
development is projected to result in a decrease in traffic compared to by-right uses under the exis6ng zoning.
The site is immediately adjacent to exis6ng commercial and single-family residen6al developments fron6ng US Hwy
17. An exis6ng single-family neighborhood also directly abuts the subject site to the east. In addi6on, the proposed
townhome units adjacent to the exis6ng single-family neighborhood are rotated so the ends of the units face these
nearby homes to limit the visibility from windows and balconies into the exis6ng neighborhood.
The site is designated as a Community Mixed Use place type, a common designa6on for areas along major roads,
which is intended to provide a transi6on to lower density residen6al proper6es located away from the roadway. It is
immediately adjacent to exis6ng commercial and single-family residen6al developments fron6ng the highway and rear
of the property. It also borders the Villages at Planta6on Landing townhomes to the south with single-family homes
and vacant land to the east.
Commercial districts, like CB, are iden6fied as typical zoning categories for uses in the Community Mixed Use Place
type. The CB zoning would allow for a variety of office, retail, and personal service uses that would be appropriate in
this area. The design of the proposed project supports the transi6onal nature of the Community Mixed Use place type,
loca6ng the two-story commercial building immediately adjacent to the highway and exis6ng commercial uses.
The RMF-L zoning includes a townhome component with a moderate project density of 9.8 units per acre, in-line with
the preferred density range for the Community Mixed Use place type (up to 15 units per acre). Limi6ng the height of
the proposed townhomes ensures they are more in-line with the surrounding single-family and townhome
developments. In addi6on, the proposed townhouse product supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goal to provide for a
range of housing types, opportuni6es, and choices for households of different sizes and income levels.
The proposed condi6onal RMF-L and CB rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan
because it will provide for the types of retail and office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the
residen6al densi6es proposed for the townhome por6on of the project are in-line with those suggested for that place
type, and the project will provide an appropriate transi6on between a major highway corridor and exis6ng lower
density residen6al development.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth & Economic DevelopmentEncourage development of complete communi6es in the unincorporated
countyCi6zens have daily needs met by NHC businesses and support themEnsure NHC has appropriate housing to
support business growthIncrease connec6vity of residents to each other and their investment to New Hanover
County
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval of this applica6on and suggests the following mo6on:
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with
the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed CB por6on of the project will provide for
the types of retail and office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residen6al densi6es proposed
for the townhome por6on of the project are in-line with those suggested for that place type, and the project will
provide an appropriate transi6on between a major highway corridor and exis6ng lower density residen6al
development. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the
proposal has poten6al to provide services to the adjacent residen6al neighborhoods and could reduce the need to
travel on Market Street, and would align with the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of providing more diversity of housing
types.
Alterna6ve Mo6on for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed CB por6on of the project will provide
for the types of retail and office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residen6al densi6es
proposed for the townhome por6on of the project are in-line with those suggested for that place type, and the project
will provide an appropriate transi6on between a major highway corridor and exis6ng lower density residen6al
development, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is
not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the
adjacent neighborhoods.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z20-15)
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Redland Development Incorporated, to
rezone approximately 7.15 acres of land located at 8814 Market Street (Hwy 17), north of Futch Creek
Road, from R-15, Residential District, and B-1, Neighborhood Business, to (CZD) RMF-L, Conditional
Residential Multi-Family Low Density District, and (CZD) CB, Conditional Community Business District,
in order to construct a 60-unit townhome development and an 8,000 square foot retail/office/personal
service building.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for
rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. I find it
to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
proposed CB portion of the project will provide for the types of retail and office uses
recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residential densities proposed for the
townhome portion of the project are in-line with those suggested for that place type, and the
project will provide an appropriate transition between a major highway corridor and existing
lower density residential development. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal has potential to provide services
to the adjacent residential neighborhoods and could reduce the need to travel on Market
Street, and would align with the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of providing more diversity of
housing types.
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1
Example Motion of Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. While I find
it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
proposed CB portion of the project will provide for the types of retail and office uses
recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residential densities proposed for the
townhome portion of the project are in-line with those suggested for that place type, and the
project will provide an appropriate transition between a major highway corridor and existing
lower density residential development, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of
the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to [Approve/Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB
district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 1 of 16
STAFF REPORT FOR Z20-15
CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z20-15
Request:
Rezoning to conditional RMF-L and conditional CB districts
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Redland Development Incorporated
Location: Acreage:
8800 block of US 17 7.15
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R02900-003-032-000 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped 60 Townhome Units (Row-Style) and
8,000 sf Retail/Office
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15 and B-1 (CZD) RMF-L Residential Multi-Family Low Density
& (CZD) CB Community Business
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Professional Office, Commercial, and Institutional B-1, (CZD) B-1, R-15
East Single-Family Residential R-15
South Single-Family Residential, Commercial, Undeveloped R-15, R-7, B-1
West US 17 Right-of-Way, Single-Family Residential, Multi-
Family Residential, Undeveloped R-15, (CUD) O&I
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 2 of 16
ZONING HISTORY
July 6, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 and B-1 (Area 5)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA. Specific design
will be determined during site plan review.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Station Porters Neck
Schools Porters Neck Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools
For more information, see the full School statistics below.
Recreation Ogden Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No known conservation resources
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 3 of 16
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 7.15 acres from R-15 (approximately
6.07 acres) and B-1 (approximately 1.08 acres) to (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB to construct
a 60-unit townhome development and a mixture of retail sales, office, and personal services
in an 8,000 square foot building. As proposed, the RMF-L portion of the site would be 6.11
acres and the CB portion would be 1.04 acres.
The conceptual plan indicates there will be nine groups of townhomes with three buildings
containing nine units each (27 total units), one building containing eight units (8 total units),
and five buildings containing five units each (25 total units) for a total of 60 units. Each of
the townhome buildings will be two-stories and limited to 35 feet in height. The commercial
component of this proposal will be a two-story/8,000 square foot retail
sales/office/personal services building and will share access with the residential portion of
the site, as well as the Benjamin Moore Paint commercial development to the north.
Below: Applicant’s Conceptual Plan with Staff Markups.
Connection to Futch
Creek Road NOT
Proposed
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 4 of 16
Above: Commercial (CB) Component of the Applicant’s Conceptual Plan with Staff Markups
Below: Townhome (RMF-L) Component of the Applicant’s Conceptual Plan with Staff Markups
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 5 of 16
According the County’s general watershed data, the downstream outfall of the site flows
southeast to a tributary of Futch Creek. If this request is approved, direction of the
downstream flow will be verified during the TRC review process when more detailed
engineering design is completed. The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater
facilities for the project to meet the County’s requirement to a handle a 25-year storm event
(≈8 inches of rain over a 24-hour period).
If approved, the applicant will be required to obtain both a State and County Stormwater
Permit prior to construction. New Hanover County Engineering will require a Stormwater
Authorization-to-Construct and stormwater control measures are required to maintain the
pre-development runoff rate for the 2-, 10-, and 25-year storms. In addition, analysis for
the 100-year storm is required to verify that no buildings are flooded. Other New Hanover
County stormwater requirements will be reviewed and verified during the TRC review
process.
The open ditch that currently runs across the northeast portion of the subject site is proposed
to be filled and piped to the same discharge point where it currently flows, which is to the
east towards a ditch behind the homes on the northern side of New Forest Drive. The
applicant has indicated that the proposed stormwater pond’s outfall will also be in this
location.
County development regulations require measures to ensure the development does not
erode the existing channel. Engineering staff will ensure compliance with these provisions
during the technical review and stormwater permitting process if the rezoning is approved.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The subject site is currently split zoned. Approximately 6 acres on the eastern side of the
site is zoned R-15 and the remaining 1.08 acres along Market Street/US 17 is zoned B-1.
Under the County’s performance residential standards, the current residentially zoned
portion of the property (R-15/6.07 acres) would allow up to 15 dwelling units at a
maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The applicant is proposing 60
townhome units on 6.11 acres at a net density of 9.82 du/ac.
The portion of the property zoned B-1 (approximately 1.08 acres) is generally estimated
to support about 11,000 square feet of traditional commercial uses (restaurants, offices,
and retail establishments) based on a typical 25% building area for this type of zoning.
Alternatively, the B-1 portion of the site could be developed residentially if a special use
permit is obtained. However, any dwelling units would have to be part of a mixed use
development.
A 20-foot opaque bufferyard is required between the townhomes and the abutting single-
family housing.
Residential Commercial
Typical Development
under Current Zoning:
R-15: 15 Single-Family
Dwelling Units B-1: ~11,000 sf
Proposed
Development:
RMF-L: 60 Townhome
Dwelling Units CB: 8,000 sf
Net Change: +45 Dwelling Units -3,000 sf
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 6 of 16
TRANSPORTATION
Access is provided to the subject property by US 17, just north of Futch Creek Road. As
proposed, the commercial and residential uses will share one driveway off US 17.
Preliminary NCDOT comments indicate a right turn lane will be required and specific details
will be determined during the driveway permitting process. In addition, the applicant has
agreed to connect the proposed commercial parking lot to the existing commercial lot to the
north (Benjamin Moore Paint).
There is an unimproved private drive on the southwestern portion of the subject property,
however, the applicant is not proposing to make this roadway connection to Futch Creek
Road. The Market Street driveway is sufficient to meet the UDO requirements and
preliminary Fire Services’ comments indicate that driveway is sufficient to meet access and
circulation requirements for a development of this scale. The area where another connection
could be possible is very narrow which would likely only accommodate one-way traffic. In
addition, nearby residents have expressed a preference that a driveway connection is not
made to Futch Creek Road.
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 7 of 16
Turning movements associated with the proposed driveway are limited to right-in/right-out
because of the median along US 17. Motorists leaving the subject site would be required to
travel northbound approximately 400 feet to the nearest signalized u-turn.
The portion of the site currently zoned R-15 would be permitted a maximum of 15 dwelling
units, which is estimated to generate about 16 trips in both the AM and PM peak hours.
Under the proposed RMF-L zoning, 60 townhomes could be constructed on the site, which is
estimated to generate about 30 trips in the AM and 38 trips in the PM peak hours.
The expected net difference in traffic associated with residential development would be an
increase of 14 AM and 22 PM peak trips when compared to current zoning.
The trips generated from existing B-1 portion of the property would vary based on the
commercial use of the site. However, if the B-1 portion of the site was developed with a
typical approximate 25% building footprint, an 11,000 square foot shopping center or
comparable development could be built and is estimated to generate about 158 AM and
106 PM peak hours. Under the proposed CB zoning, 4,000 square feet of retail and 4,000
square feet of office/personal services is estimated to generate about 25 AM trips and 32
PM trips in the peak hours.
The expected net difference in traffic associated with commercial development would be a
decrease of 133 AM and 74 peak trips when compared to current zoning.
The total trips estimated to be generated from the site as currently zoned is about 174 in
the AM peak and 122 in the PM peak hours.
This proposed townhome development and retail/office/personal services building is
estimated to generate about 55 trips in the AM peak and 70 trip in the PM peak. When
comparing the proposed rezoning to the current zoning, the cumulative impact is expected
to decrease traffic by 119 trips in the AM and 52 trips in the PM peak.
Any development proposed on the subject site would add traffic to the nearby roadways
when compared to the currently undeveloped site, but the proposed townhomes and
commercial component are expected to generate fewer trips than if the site was developed
under current zoning.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 8 of 16
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM
Typical Development under
Current Zoning:
15 single-family homes
11,000 sf shopping center 174 AM / 122 PM
Proposed Development under
Proposed RMF-L/CB Zoning:
60 townhome units
4,000 sf of retail
4,000 office/personal
services
55 AM / 70 PM
Net Change under Proposed
RMF-L/CB Zoning: – -119 AM / -52 PM
The recently approved nearby development, The Oaks at Murray Farm, completed a Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA) which studied intersections within the general area.
o That analysis found that the intersection of “Old” Market Street/Futch Creek Road
at US 17 will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) C when The Oaks at Murray Farm
project is expected to be completed in 2023. In addition, The Oaks at Murray Farm
project will install a second right turn lane at the intersection on “Old” Market
Street/Futch Creek Road.
o The TIA also found that the nearby u-turn lane on US 17 to the north will also operate
at a LOS C (AM) and B (PM) when The Oaks at Murray Farm project is completed
in 2023.
o This analysis generally indicates capacity is available at these intersections and the
proposed use is projected to result in a decrease in traffic compared to by-right
development under the existing zoning.
A 342-unit mixed-use/Senior Living development was recently considered and
recommended for approval by the Planning Board on a site approximately 800 feet south
of the subject property along “Old” Market Street/Futch Creek Road. That request is
scheduled to be considered by the Board of Commissioners at the September 8, 2020
meeting. Although the mixed-use development would increase the number of units in the
vicinity, it is estimated to decrease the trips generated from that site than if the site was
developed as currently zoned.
Staff has also provided the volume to capacity ratio for Market Street/US 17 near the
subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a
general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to
pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when
determining the Level of Service of a roadway.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2018
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
US 17 10000 Block (north of Sidbury
Road in Pender County) 38,500 31,900 1.21
Market Street 8000 Block (north of Sweetwater
Drive) 42,000 43,700 0.96
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 8
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 9 of 16
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
STIP Project U-4751 (Military Cutoff Extension)
o Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to I-140.
o The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late
2022/early 2023.
o The project will also install a sidewalk and multi-use path along the extension of
Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project.
STIP Project U-4902D (Market Street Median)
o Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street
from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways
will consist of a 10-foot multi-use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5-
foot sidewalk on the western side of the street.
o The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed by early
2023.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 9
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 10 of 16
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity* TIA Status
1. The Oaks at Murray
Farm
204 Apartments
34 Duplex Units
62 Single-Family
Dwellings
Approved December 6,
2019
Full Build 2023
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of a second westbound right-turn lane on “Old” Market Street at US 17
Revising signal plan to modify phase at the US 17 and “Old” Market Street intersection.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Waterstone
Development Status: No construction has occurred at this time.
*The TIA analyzed 406 dwelling units on the subject site. Shown are the 300 units approved by the Board of
Commissioners.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Scotts Hill Medical
Park
132,000 sf Office
18,000 sf Medical Office
32,000 sf Shopping
Center
9,000 sf Pharmacy with
Drive-Through
Approved August 5, 2019
Phase 1 & 2: 2020 Build Out
Year
Full Build: 2022
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of a northbound U-turn lane on US 17 south of Scott Hill Loop Road.
Installation of a southbound left turn lane on US 17 at Scotts Hill Medical Drive.
Installation of a northbound right turn lane, removal of the barrier from the southbound
left turn lane, and signalization of the intersection on US 17 at the site’s southern access
point.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Scotts Hill Village
Coastal Prep Academy
Development Status: Phase 1 of the medical park has been platted consisting of 3 lots.
Currently, one office building is open. No roadway improvements have been completed at
this time.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 10
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 11 of 16
SCHOOLS
Students generated from this development would be assigned to Porters Neck Elementary,
Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet,
year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
Fifteen dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base density, and
60 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 45 dwelling units
Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school
students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling
unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate
14.5 (6.5 elementary, 3.3 middle, and 4.7 high) students, which is approximately 10.9 more
than if developed under existing zoning.
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation
Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high
Typical Development
under Current Zoning 15 residential units Total: 3.6
(1.6 elementary, 0.8 middle, 1.2 high)
Proposed Development
under Proposed (CZD)
R-5 Zoning
60 residential units Total: 14.5
(6.5 elementary, 3.3 middle, 4.7 high)
*Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student
enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different
housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can
provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which
includes students attending out-of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and
SeaTECH.
School Enrollment* and Capacity**—2021-2022 Estimates
*Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020-2021 school year
and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific
program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children’s classrooms
beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms
designated for art and music if the building wasn’t specifically designed with those spaces.
Level
Total
NHC %
Capacity School
Enrollment of
Assigned
School
Capacity of
Assigned
School w/
Portables
% of
Capacity of
Assigned
School
Funded
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 97% Porters Neck 475 552 86% None
Middle 107% Holly Shelter 917 934 98% None
High 105% Laney 2063 1903 108% None
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 11
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 12 of 16
ENVIRONMENTAL
The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas.
The property is within the Futch Creek (SA;HQW) watershed.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on
the property consist of Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the site will be served by
CFPUA water and sewer.
CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY
The subject property is located along US 17, just east of the intersection with the I-140
Bypass and the Porters Neck growth node.
The site is immediately adjacent to existing commercial and single-family residential
developments fronting US 17. An existing single-family neighborhood also directly abuts
the subject site to the east.
The proposed townhome units adjacent to the existing single-family neighborhood are
rotated so the ends of the units face these nearby homes to limit the visibility from windows
and balconies into the existing neighborhood.
The townhome buildings will be similar to the buildings in the Villages at Plantation Landing
south of the subject site.
The proposed townhomes will function as a transition from the high intensity adjacent
highway to the existing single-family neighborhood directly abutting the subject site to the
east.
The proposed townhome development will be two stories and restricted to the same
maximum 35-foot height that applies to the existing and adjacent areas zoned R-15.
The commercial component of the site will share a driveway with an existing commercial
development to the north, which consists of two structures that are approximately 7,000 and
4,000 square feet in area. In addition, there is an approximately 2,500 square foot
contractor’s office to the immediate south.
Representative Developments of RMF-L:
Woodlands at Echo Farms Villages at Plantation Landing
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 12
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 13 of 16
Sun Coast Condos and Sun Coast Villas off Gordon Road
Representative Developments of CB:
Benjamin Moore Paint Store
off Market Street/US 17 Multi-Tenant Building
off Market Street
Representative Developments of R-15:
Grayson Park Clay Crossing
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 13
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 14 of 16
Plantation Landing
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 14
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 15 of 16
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors.
Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational,
commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential.
Analysis
The subject property is located along US 17, just east of the intersection with
the I-140 Bypass and the Porters Neck growth node. It is immediately
adjacent to existing commercial and single-family residential developments
fronting the highway and rear of the property. It also borders the Villages
at Plantation Landing townhomes to the south with single-family homes and
vacant land to the east.
The site is designated as a Community Mixed Use place type, a common
designation for areas along major roads, which is intended to provide a
transition to lower density residential properties located away from the
roadway.
The rezoning request consists of a 1.04-acre portion of Community Business
zoning located immediately adjacent to US 17 with the remaining 6.11
acres designated as RMF-L zoning located next to existing single-family
homes and townhouse neighborhoods. Commercial districts, like CB, are
identified as typical zoning categories for uses in the Community Mixed Use
place type. The CB zoning would allow for a variety of office, retail, and
personal service uses that would be appropriate in this area. The RMF-L
zoning includes a townhome component with a moderate project density of
9.8 units per acre, in-line with the preferred density range for the
Community Mixed Use place type (up to 15 units per acre).
The design of the proposed project supports the transitional nature of the
Community Mixed Use place type, locating the two-story commercial
building immediately adjacent to the highway and existing commercial uses
and limiting the height of the proposed townhomes so they are more in-line
with the surrounding single-family and townhome developments. In addition,
the increased land use efficiency of the proposed townhouse product
supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goal to provide for a range of housing
types, opportunities, and choices for households of different sizes and
income levels.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed conditional RMF-L and CB rezoning is generally CONSISTENT
with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it will provide for the types of
retail and office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the
residential densities proposed for the townhome portion of the project are
in-line with those suggested for that place type, and the project will provide
an appropriate transition between a major highway corridor and existing
lower density residential development.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 15
Z20-15 Staff Report 9.3.2020 Page 16 of 16
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The proposed (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because the proposed CB portion of the project has potential to provide
services to the adjacent residential neighborhoods and could reduce the need to travel on Market
Street. The community scale commercial and moderate density residential would provide an orderly
transition between existing lower density residential neighborhoods and development adjacent to
Market Street, and would align with the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of providing more diversity of
housing types.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. I
find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan
because the proposed CB portion of the project will provide for the types of retail and
office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residential densities
proposed for the townhome portion of the project are in-line with those suggested for
that place type, and the project will provide an appropriate transition between a
major highway corridor and existing lower density residential development. I also find
APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because
the proposal has potential to provide services to the adjacent residential
neighborhoods and could reduce the need to travel on Market Street, and would align
with the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of providing more diversity of housing types.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L and (CZD) CB district. While
I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan
because the proposed CB portion of the project will provide for the types of retail and
office uses recommended for Community Mixed Use areas, the residential densities
proposed for the townhome portion of the project are in-line with those suggested for
that place type, and the project will provide an appropriate transition between a major
highway corridor and existing lower density residential development, I find DENIAL of
the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is
not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density
will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 16
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 6 - 2
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1
Page 4 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: ______________________ Total Acreage of Proposed District: __________
Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional
Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose
of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed).
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Proposed Condition(s)
Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the
development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These
conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community.
Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board,
and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
(CZD)RMF-L&(CZD)CB 7.15 AC.
(CZD)RMF-L=6.11ACRES/PROPOSESIXTY(60)TWO-STORYATTACHEDTOWNHOMESWITHPARKING&
STORMWATERFACILITY.
(CZD)CB=1.04ACRES/PROPOSE8000S.F.TWO-STORYCOMMERCIALBUILDINGFORMIXOFRETAIL,
OFFICE&PERSONALSERVICESUSESWITHPARKING.
**REFERENCESITEPLANFORSITELAYOUT&IMPROVEMENTS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2
Page 5 of 7
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 5/2017
Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed
for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
ITE Land Use: _________________________________________________________________________________
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): __________________________________
AM Peak Hour Trips: ___________________________ PM Peak Hour Trips: ______________________________
CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific
use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very
dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can
create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community-at-large. The applicant must
explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District
meets the following criteria.
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development? (For
example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans)
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property’s classification on the
Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
4000S.F.RETAIL (820)/4000S.F.OFFICE (710)/60RESIDNETIALTOWNHOME (230)
CALCULATEDPERGFA&DWELLINGS
4 /6 /26=3615 /6 /31=42
Thepoliciesforgrowthanddevelopmentencouragesafeandaffordablehousingtobeavailabletoevery
citizen.SustainabilityoftheCountydependsonsensiblein-fillandmaximizinguseoflandsalready
accessibletoservices.
ThetractisidentifiedintheComprehensiveLandUsePlanasaCommunityMixed-useplacetype.Theplan
suggestshigherdensitiestosupportthesmall-scale,compactdevelopmentpatternsthattheplacetype
promotes.Theproposeddevelopmentisanacceptabletransitionbetweenthebusyhighwaycorridorand
themoreestablishedsingle-familyhousingbeyondtheboundaryofthetract.
MarketStreet(USHwy17)isamajorthoroughfareofthecommunity.Single-familyresidencesareless
attractivealongverybusytrafficcorridors.Transitionofdensityisanacceptableplanningstrategy.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
2
-
7
-
6
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
2
-
7
-
7
Legal Descriptions for Conditional Zoning Districts
at 8814 Market Street
Rezoning 1.04 acres+/‐ from R‐15 & B‐1 to (CZD) CB:
Beginning at a point in the southeastern boundary of Market Street (U.S. Hwy. 17), a variable width public
right‐of‐way; said point being located approximately 409.5 feet along the boundary from its intersection with
the northeastern boundary of Old Market Street (a.k.a. Futch Creek Road Extension); and running thence with
the Market Street right‐of‐way:
North 42024’57” East, 155.75 feet to a point; thence
South 48001’59” East, 196.60 feet to a point in the southeastern boundary of a 30’ Duke Power
Right‐of‐way; thence
South 44028’37” East, 126.93 feet to a point; thence
South 42034’31” West, 119.60 feet to a point; thence
North 53001’58” West, 324.47 to the point and place of beginning, containing 1.04 acres, more or less.
Rezoning 6.11 acres+/‐ from R‐15 & B‐1 to (CZD) RMF‐L:
Beginning at a point located South 53001’58” East, 324.47 feet from a point in the southeastern boundary of
Market Street (U.S. Hwy. 17), a variable width public right‐of‐way; said point being located approximately
409.5 feet along the boundary from its intersection with the northeastern boundary of Old Market Street
(a.k.a. Futch Creek Road Extension); and running thence with the Market Street right‐of‐way:
North 42034’31” East, 119.60 feet to a point; thence
South 44028’37” East, 50.79 feet to a point; thence
South 47007’47” East, 135.05 feet to a point; thence
South 47020’31” East, 134.59 feet to a point; thence
South 43008’49” West, 236.54 feet to a point; thence
South 46011’17” West, 419.97 feet to a point; thence
South 49041’16” East, 105.47 feet to a point; thence
South 46005’01” West, 40.20 feet to a point; thence
North 49043’30” West, 512.22 feet to a point; thence
North 47027’07” East, 1.28 feet to a point; thence
North 00057’32” West, 33.46 feet to a point; thence
South 51018’49” East, 183.63 feet to a point; thence
North 43004’42” East, 150.37 feet to a point; thence
North 51018’49” West, 100.05 feet to a point; thence
South 43003’39” West, 47.17 feet to a point; thence
North 50054’37” West, 113.33 feet to a point; thence
North 42030’50” East, 242.05 feet to a point; thence
South 52038’43” East, 45.99 feet to a point; thence
North 42037’10” East, 75.22 feet to a point; thence
South 53004’19” East, 124.09 feet to a point; thence
North 42034’31” East, 134.89 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 6.11 acres, more or less.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 8
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING NOTIFIACTION
BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Project Name: The Pinnacle / 8814 Market Street
Proposed Zoning: B-1 & R-15 to (CZD) CB & (CZD) RMF-L
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a project proposal and an exhibit of the site
layout for the above proposed zoning application was sent to the adjacent property owners set
forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of
the Sunshine List on July 14, 2020. The mailing gave the recipients opportunity to contact us with
questions or comments via telephone or email. Copies of the written notices and the site layout
are attached.
The persons responding were: Reference attached list of contacts received from calls and
emails.
Date: August 5, 2020
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 9
Community Information
Pinacle Townhomes
NameAddressEmail (Optional)
Voleania Ryan
for Katherine Simmons 106 Foys Trailvoleania.ryan@gmail.com
Gregory Bentley8915 Tilbury Dr gsb.emails@gmail.com
Cindee WolfProject Planner cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 10
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
2
-
7
-
1
1
ADJACENT OWNER NAMEMAILING ADDRESSCITY / STATE / ZIPADJACENT PROPERTY SITUS ADDRESS6943 MARKET LLC 2900 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411116 FOYS TRL WILMINGTONABDULGHANI ISMAILA126 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON, NC 28401126 FOYS TRL WILMINGTONADAMS LESLIE N117 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON, NC 28411117 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON
ANDERSON DAVID BEVERLY8916 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118916 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
BAILEY KAITLIN B8967 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118967 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
BALLARD AYANNA R ETAL122 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON, NC 28405120 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON
BENTLEY GREGORY S ELIZABETH I8915 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118915 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
BOATWRIGHT ROY LOU ANNE121 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON, NC 28411121 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON
BOOTH SCOTT RICHARD8928 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118928 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
BROWN ARNOLD ETAL8763 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284118779 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
BROWN WILLIAM C ETAL6941 WRIGHTVILLE AVE WILMINGTON, NC 284038841 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
CLAYTON PROPERTIES GROUP INC5000 CLAYTON RD MARYVILLE, TN 37804 VILLAGES AT PLANTATION LANDING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSN8737 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284118737 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
COXE GERALDINE RICHARDSON109 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON, NC 28411109 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON
CURBO DAVID M KELLI E8909 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118909 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
FIDELITY HOLDING COMPANY LLC8804 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 284118804 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEESPO BOX 751WILMINGTON, NC 284028800 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
FOY DAVID III ETAL8857 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284118857 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
GOODLOW JERRY W REV TRUST ETAL 8931 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118931 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
GOTTSCHALK BERNARD J ETAL8920 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118920 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
GREEN DANIEL LEE DELPHINE RENA8762 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 284118762 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
GREEN JERRY HRS2118 ROBERT E LEE BLV BOSSIER CITY, LA 711128865 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
GREENE WYONNE H BARBARA300 BUCKHURST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118786 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
HALL WILLIAM EDWARD JODIE BUTLER8905 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118905 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
HINES JIMMIE8845 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284118845 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
HODGES SAMMY R LOREN L 8908 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118908 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
JOHNSON LARRY E PAULA M8906 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118906 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
KIRST JESSICA8912 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118912 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
LASKO JUDITH A8963 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118963 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
LATTER GERALD M PAMELA S8915 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118915 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
LOWMAN CONRAD KAREN8537 BALD EAGLE LN WILMINGTON, NC 284118871 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
MARTINEZ LORENZO LEA BARTOLOME2119 BRANDON RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058790 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
MCINTYRE DORTHA DAVID L SR216 ROCKAWAY AVE APT 8EBROOKLYN, NY 112338834 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
MCINTYRE MARY L PIERCE129 MCINTYRE TRL WILMINGTON, NC 28405129 MCINTYRE TRL WILMINGTON
MCMILLAN EUGENE LORETTA8833 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284118837 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
MOORE LISA D8951 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118951 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
MOYA RAQIBA126 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON, NC 28411220 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON
MURRAY GEORGE L HENRIETTA8759 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058759 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
NIXON BESSIE F ETAL 8830 MARKET ST WILMINGTON, NC 284118830 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
NIXON LIZZIE B119 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON, NC 28411119 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON
OLSEN MARC V CYNTHIA8905 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118905 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
PADULA ROBERT M LORA B8919 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118919 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
PALESE MATTHEW KATHLEEN8905 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284058905 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
POSTEL KEVIN T KATHLEEN G8955 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118955 PLANTATION LANDING DR
PRIDGEN BERNICE HRS8801 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058801 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
PRIDGEN LEROY JR HEIRS8805 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058805 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
RAWLINGS KATHY I8910 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118910 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
REDDICK HERBERT ETAL265 RIDGE CIRCLE RD HENDERSON, NC 27537 8802 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
REDLAND DEVELOPMENT INC6622 GORDON RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058814 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
RIGGINS MICHELLE APO BOX 11079WILMINGTON, NC 28404 8856 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
SATTERFIELD ANTHONY R DIANE S8904 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118904 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
SCHUMAN ZACHARY ASHLEY H8909 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118909 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
SHUPING MARY B TRUSTEE8743 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118915 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
SIMMONS KATHERINE3329 WILTON DR SUMPTER, SC 29150
SMALLWOOD BRANDON MELANIE8900 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118900 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
SMITH EDWARD L LUCI M8909 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118909 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
ST STEPHENS AME CHURCH8799 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 284058799 STEPHENS CHURCH RD WILMINGTON
STAINBACK LYNDSEY M CHRISTOPHER8923 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118923 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
STUART EDWIN T AMY C8927 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118927 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
TWOMEY EDWARD A SR EILEEN17 GREEN HILLS RD LONG VALLEY, NJ 078538908 PLANTATION LANDING DR WILMINGTON
VALE MILENE OMAR M8916 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118916 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
VIOREL JOHN C AILEEN W8935 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118935 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
WALKER ELIZA JANE HRS1621 ANN ST WILMINGTON, NC 284018846 MARKET ST WILMINGTON
WALSH HENRY101 HUGHES RD HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443113 FOYS TRL WILMINGTON
WARD FRANK J III STACY R8936 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411220 CREEKWOOD RD WILMINGTON
WARD FRANK J STACY8936 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118936 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
WHEELER BRIAN T DEBORAH8904 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118904 TILBURY DR WILMINGTON
WHITLEY CHARLES J ASHLEY B8919 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON, NC 284118919 NEW FOREST DR WILMINGTON
YOUNTS AVERY HAYWARD DEBRA WYNNE ROBBINS113 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON, NC 28411113 WHITE STONE PL WILMINGTON
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 12
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 13
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
2
-
7
-
1
4
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 2
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1
OPPOSITION
MATERIALS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 10 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 10 - 2
Gregory Bentley
8915 Tilbury Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
August 26, 2020
New Hanover County Planning Board
Donna Girardot, Chair
Paul D. Boney, Vice Chair
Ernest W. Olds
Jeffrey B. Petroff
H. Allen Pope
Thomas “Jordy” Rawl
Colin J. Tarrant
Re: Item 2, September 3, 2020 Planning Board Meeting – Rezoning Request (Z20-15), Re-
quest by Design Solutions on behalf of property owner Redland Development Corporation
to rezone 7.15 acres of land located at 8814 Market Street, from R-15 and B-1 zoning to
(CZD) RMF-L, Residential Multi-Family Low Density District and (CZD) CB, in order to
develop 60 attached townhomes
Dear Planning Board Members:
This letter speaks in opposition to the captioned rezoning request (the “Rezoning Re-
quest”) for the property described above (the “Redland Property”).
It is submitted on behalf of the following homeowners on Tilbury Drive, New Forest
Drive and Plantation Landing Drive in the Plantation Landing neighborhood, all of whom have
homes adjacent to or near the Redland Property or on Futch Creek, which will be materially ad-
versely affected by the Rezoning Request:
• Gregory and Elizabeth Bentley, 8915 Tilbury Drive
• Eddie and Amy Stuart, 8927 Tilbury Drive
• Chris and Lindsey Stainback, 8923 Tilbury Drive
• Cam and Angie Israel, 8919 Tilbury Drive
• Kevin Davidson, 8909 Tilbury Drive
• Larry and Gay Johnson, 8906 New Forest Drive
• Milene and Omar Carvalho, 8916 New Forest Drive
• Jeff and Stacy Ward, 8936 Tilbury Drive
• Scott and Stephanie Booth, 8928 Tilbury Drive
• Nick Romano, 511 Sagewood Drive
• David Anderson, 8916 Plantation Landing Drive
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 1
2
We request that the Planning Board reject or, in the absence of a rejection, at least make a
modification of the Rezoning Request, for the following reasons:
Breach of the General Purposes and Intent Requirements of the UDO
The Rezoning Request, as submitted, is inconsistent with the express purposes and intent
of the Unified Development Ordinance (“UDO”) adopted by the County Board of Commission-
ers and therefore must be denied, as filed.
Specifically, the Rezoning Request does not satisfy the express standards of Section 3.2.1
of the UDO and therefore the current application, as written and unamended, should be denied in
its entirety.
UDO Section 3.2.1 (page 3-13 of the UDO) states the purposes and intent of the UDO,
generally: "The residential zoning districts are intended to: (A) provide appropriately located ar-
eas for residential development that are consistent with ... the public health, safety and gen-
eral welfare; (B) Ensure adequate ... privacy for all dwelling units; [and] (E) Protect resi-
dential districts from flooding...", among other intents.
The Rezoning Request violates the bolded purposes and intents of the UDO. The pro-
posed development would materially increase the risk of erosion and flooding along Futch Creek
and in the lower parts of Plantation Landing. In addition, the proposed development should pro-
vide increased widths of its plant buffers, to ensure adequate privacy and to reduce the increased
traffic noise from US-17 resulting from removal of so many trees on the developed property be-
tween our neighborhood and US-17.
Creation of Additional Erosion and Downstream Flooding
The Rezoning Request creates the probability that there will be substantially increased
erosion and flow of storm water into the Futch Creek gully and risks of flooding, especially in
homes in the lower elevations of Plantation Landing into which Futch Creek flows, without ade-
quate measures to avoid this predictable result.
The upper end of Futch Creek, a 15-foot deep gully that extends from the Redland Prop-
erty down to the lower parts of the Plantation Landing, has suffered significant erosion of its
banks in the past when hurricanes and major storms have occurred in the area. Furthermore, as
Futch Creek approaches the lower parts of our neighborhood, flooding of properties up to their
garage doors in Plantation Landing have occurred in past hurricanes, but not (yet) so much as to
flood the houses themselves.
The following two photographs show the current erosion in the Futch Creek gully, and
one of them shows how close some of the homes on New Forest Drive and Tilbury Drive are to
the gully:
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 2
3
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 3
4
The following photograph shows the extent of flooding of some of the properties in the
lower elevations of Plantation Landing after heavy storms that would be materially worsened by
increased storm water coming from an inadequate stormwater retention pond and substantially
increased impervious surfaces on the Redland Property:
The Rezoning Request proposes to add only a 25-year detention pond capable of han-
dling only 8 inches of rain in a day’s storm before overflowing into the top end of Futch Creek.
It also proposes to install a culvert under the Redland Property to replace the current
feeder gully on the Redland Property transporting surface water from near US-17, dumping it
into the top end of Futch Creek at the gully’s location.
The Redland Property will also remove a majority of the trees currently on the 6.43 acre
residential portion of the development property and create a surface that is 67.5% impermeable
in nature (according of the developer’s application).
We all know that our area routinely and predictably is hit every year or two by hurri-
canes, tropic storms and “rain bombs” and thunderstorms dropping multiple inches of rain in
brief periods. In New Hanover County, we all know that we will predictably get substantially
more water than 8 inches per day in storms with some frequency. We also know that rather than
much of it soaking in to the ground below the trees and bushes on the property today, at least
two-thirds of it will now flow into a detention pond that is known will not – indeed, cannot by its
very design – prevent substantial additional storm water from flowing into Futch Creek in major
storms.
This substantial additional storm water flow will predictably increase the erosion
throughout the length of Futch Creek and worsen the risk of flooding in the lower parts of Plan-
tation Landing.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 4
5
Moreover, the new culvert under the Redland Property would also permit faster flows of
the transported water from the other side of the property, and thus permit the water to emerge
from the culvert in more of a faster, “firehose” effect, again worsening erosion in the Futch
Creek gully. While the developer has advised the neighbors on a recent call that the County
would require the use of water-calming methods to the end or inside of the culvert, it was not
prepared to provide any details on what would be installed at or in the culvert to give us assur-
ance that the water flowing out of the culvert will not further erode the banks of the Futch Creek
gully.
To prevent such negative impacts and harm to many of our homeowners along the Futch
Creek gully and in the lower parts of Plantation Landing, the Rezoning Request would need to
(a) install at least a 100-year detention pond in the Redland Property and (b) commit to designing
into the culvert adequate “water calming” design features to ensure that the rate of flow out of
the culvert was the same as the rate of flow currently occurring in the gully transporting water
across the Redland Property and will not impact the sides of the gully.
This would be consistent with another recent precedent by the Planning Board when it
approved the rezoning of the recent The Oaks at Murray Hill development project with such a
100-year detention pond.
Conclusion
Just because Redland Development Corporation asks for a change in zoning does not
mean that it is entitled to one.
While in an ideal world, we would be happiest if the Redland Property was left in its tree-
covered condition, we do recognize that development of the property will happen. We do not
object to the property being developed for multi-family use with the proposed two-story town-
homes approach – provided that (a) more effective steps are taken to prevent increased storm
water flows in the Futch Creek gully and the lower parts of Plantation Landing that would
increase erosion and flooding in our neighborhood and (b) it has a thicker plant buffer fac-
ing Tilbury, New Forest and Plantation Landing Drives.
We therefore request that the Planning Board do the following with respect to the Rezon-
ing Request:
1. Either deny the Rezoning Request, as submitted, in its entirety as inconsistent with
the UDO’s terms, especially UDO Section 3.2.1; or
2. In the alternative, require that the Rezoning Request:
a. Require that a 100-year detention pond is used to more effectively prevent ad-
ditional erosion and flooding in the Futch Creek gully and lower elevations of
Plantation Landing neighborhood.1
1 We note that this action is also in the developer’s interest, since the inadequacy of the 25-year detention
pond under the likely circumstances discussed in this letter has now been “noticed” to the developer and
the future owner of the buildings, and ensuring a more adequate detention pond will reduce the risks of
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 5
6
b. Require that the developer commit to installing strong “flow-calming” struc-
tures into the cross-property storm water transfer culvert, to avoid a “firehose”
effect of such water as it comes out into the top of the Futch Creek gully.
c. Increase the planted buffer along the border along the Plantation Landing
neighborhood from 20 feet to 35-50 feet, in order to (i) provide better screen-
ing between the Redland Property and the homes on Tilbury, New Forest and
Plantation Landing Drives, (ii) reduce the increased traffic noise from US-17
resulting from the removal of a majority of trees on the developed property,
and (iii) have the secondary benefit of providing some additional natural habi-
tat for the hawks’ nest and other animal species.
• At least 8 feet of this additional buffer could come from eliminating
the six parallel parking spaces next to Units ##10 and 11, and adding
the 8 feet of existing-growth trees to the buffer. (Elimination of the six
parking spaces would leave the fire road adjacent to these units un-
changed and would leave the development with 132 parking spaces,
well in excess of the required number of parking spaces (120 parking
spaces, as noted on the developer’s plan).)
d. Protect the tree on the back side of the property near Tilbury Drive containing
the existing nest for the red-shouldered hawk family that has been living in
that tree for many years.
3. We would also request the developer to conduct a full ecological survey (e.g., with
Andy Woods, formerly of the Audubon Society) to identify and relocate any turtles,
reptiles and animals (i.e., other than the undisturbed hawks) that will be displaced to
other protected properties.
I am requesting the opportunity to address the Planning Board on this matter on Septem-
ber 3, 2020, on behalf of the homeowners listed on page 1 of this letter.
Very truly yours,
Gregory Bentley
8915 Tilbury Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
cc: New Hanover County Planning Department
Wayne Clark, Planning and Land Use Director
Brad Schuler, Senior Planner
future litigation when flooding and erosion are worsened in the future by the use of an inadequate deten-
tion pond of which it has been advised.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 6
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 9/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Marty Lile, Long Range Planner
CONTACT(S): Marty Lile; Brad Schuler, Senior Planner; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Quasi-Judicial Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S-603M) - Request by the Law Offices of Ma9hew A. Nichols on behalf of the
property owner, Planta<on Village Inc., to modify the Special Use Permit for the Planta<on Village Con<nuing
Care Re<rement Community to allow for the redevelopment of the eastern por<on of the community and to
increase the maximum number of units to 300.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is seeking to modify the Special Use Permit for the Planta$on Village Con$nuing Care Re$rement
Community in order to allow for the redevelopment of the eastern por$on of the community and to increase the
maximum number of units to 300.
The subject site is located east of The Davis Community, and is zoned R-20. Planta$on Village was originally approved
in the early 1980s. A5er several modifica$ons to the facility over the years, it currently includes 247 units (4.5 du/ac)
within apartment buildings, quadplexes, duplexes, and coages, and associated ameni$es.
As proposed, the special use permit modifica$on involves the demoli$on of three exis$ng apartment buildings, eight
quadplexes, and several accessory structures. Thirteen new apartment buildings would be constructed on the site,
ranging from 45’ to 50’ in height. The net result is an increase of 53 independent-living units. The total number of units
proposed is 300 and total density is 5.4 units per acre for the overall site.
The applicant’s traffic consultant, Davenport Engineering, has provided a Technical Memorandum to assess the
number of projected peak hour trips and any related traffic impacts. As proposed, the expansion is es$mated to
generate 23 peak hour AM trips and 32 peak hour PM trips, which is not expected to change the level of service for
any of the nearby intersec$ons.
Planta$on Village has been in opera$on since the 1980s, has direct access to a collector road, and will have minimal
impact to traffic and schools due to the age-restric$on. The site is located adjacent to a similar senior living
community and two private recrea$onal uses (Porters Neck Planta$on and the Eagle Point golf courses), and abuts
exis$ng single-family residences to the north. The exis$ng buffer will remain adjacent to the single-family homes and
the proposed structures will exceed the required 50' setback.
The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as General Residen$al. This classifica$on focuses on lower-density
housing and associated civic and commercial services. Recommended densi$es in this place type range up to 8 du/ac.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Example Mo<on for Approval:
Mo$on to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this applica$on for a Special Use Permit modifica$on meets
the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any addi$onal findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Note any condi$ons be added to the development:
[List Condi$ons]
Example Mo<on for Denial:
Mo$on to recommend denial, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required condi$ons and specifica$ons of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substan$ally injure the value of adjoining or abuJng property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the applicaon does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met]
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3
SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application (S-603M)
Request by the Law Offices of Matthew A. Nichols on behalf of the property owner,
Plantation Village Inc., to modify the Special Use Permit for the Plantation Village
Continuing Care Retirement Community to allow for the redevelopment of the eastern
portion of the community and to increase the maximum number of units to 300.
1. Swear witnesses: Announce that “the Special Use Permit process requires a quasi-judicial hearing;
therefore, any person wishing to testify must be sworn in. All persons who signed in to speak and
wish to present competent and material testimony please step forward to be sworn in. Thank you.”
2. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for
rebuttal.
3. Conduct hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
4. Close the hearing
5. Board discussion
6. Ask Applicant whether he/she agrees with staff findings.
7. Vote on the Special Use Permit application.
Motion to approve the permit - All findings are positive.
Motion to approve the permit, subject to conditions specified below:
(State Conditions)
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Motion to deny the permit because the Board cannot find:
a. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where
proposed for the following reason:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
b. That the use meets all required condition and specifications:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1
c. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property,
or that the use is a public necessity:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
d. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located
and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover
County:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit modification
meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Also, that the following conditions be added to the development:
Suggested Condition(s):
None
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons to why it is not being met]
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 1 of 20
STAFF REPORT FOR S-603M
SPECIAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: S-603M
Request:
Modification to existing SUP to renovate and expand a Senior Living: Continuing Care Retirement
Community in the R-20, Residential District from 247 dwelling units to 300 dwelling units
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Plantation Village, Inc. Plantation Village, Inc.
Location: Acreage:
1200 Porters Neck Rd. 55.51 acres
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R03700-002-002-002
R03700-002-011-000
R03700-002-012-000
R03700-002-013-000
R03700-002-014-000
R03700-002-015-000
General Residential
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Continuing Care Retirement Community Continuing Care Retirement Community
Current Zoning:
R-20
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single-Family Residential (Porters Neck Plantation) R-20
East Golf Course, Single-Family Residential (Porters Neck
Plantation) R-20
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 1
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 2 of 20
South Golf Course (Eagle Point Golf Club), Undeveloped R-20
West Continuing Care Retirement Community (The Davis
Community), Undeveloped (CUD) R-20, R-20
ZONING HISTORY
July 6, 1971 Initially zoned R-20 (Porters Neck), Area 5
August 1, 1983 SUP granted for Nursing and Personal Care Facility (S-211)
April 1, 1991 SUP Modification granted for site revisions to reduce the number of dwelling
units and increase acreage
September 7,
1993 SUP Modification granted for site plan revisions to remove a driveway
August 5, 1996 SUP Modification granted for site plan revisions to reduce the number of
dwelling units and increase acreage
April 5, 2004 SUP Modification granted for site plan revisions to add maintenance
building
June 6, 2011
New SUP granted for Continuing Care Retirement Community (supersedes
S-211) to construct a new apartment building, two duplexes, and two
cottages
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be
determined during site plan review.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Station Porters Neck
Schools Porters Neck Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, Laney High Schools
(No impacts expected due to age-restriction for senior housing)
Recreation Pages Creek Preserve, Ogden Park
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 2
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 3 of 20
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
The County’s Conservation Resources Map indicates that swamp forests may
be present on the site. Conservation space is required for swamp forest
wetlands when at least five acres of the resource exists on the property.
Preliminary analysis indicates that fewer than 5 acres exist on the site.
Verification of regulated swamp forests will be required during the site plan
review process.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The applicant is seeking to obtain a special use permit modification to renovate and expand a
Continuing Care Retirement Community in the R-20 zoning district.
Existing Conditions & Proposed Demolition Scope (Includes Staff Markups)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 3
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 4 of 20
Plantation Village was originally approved as a special use permit for a Nursing and Personal
Care Facility in 1983. This original approval included the construction of 252 units, a health
center, and commons building, on approximately 41.4 acres. The Board approved four
subsequent modifications to the original special use permit in 1991, 1993, 1996, and 2004,
resulting in several changes to the property, including the site’s current size of 55.5 acres and
contractual nursing service arrangement with The Davis Community.
In 2011, Plantation Village was granted a new special use permit for a Continuing Care
Retirement Community. This permit, extinguishing the original 1983 approval and four
subsequent modifications, resulted in the construction of an additional 33 independent-living
units (3-story apartment building, two duplexes, and two cottages), 60 additional parking
spaces, and a new wellness center and auditorium. The special use permit also authorized the
renovation of the exterior and interior of the Commons Building and Commons parking layout.
The current use of the campus includes 247 independent-living units, made up of 3-story
apartment buildings, quadplexes, duplexes, and cottages. The current overall density of the site
is 4.45 units per acre. The campus also includes a centralized Commons Building, Residential
Care Center that provides 24/7 nurse availability for residents, Wellness Center with indoor
pool and fitness center, maintenance building, and indoor and outdoor recreational amenities.
Existing Apartment (to be removed) Existing Quadplexes (to be removed)
As proposed, the special use permit modification involves the demolition of three existing
apartment buildings, eight quadplexes, and several accessory structures. These structures would
then be replaced by 13 new apartment buildings ranging from 45’ to 50’ in height. The net
result is an increase of 53 independent-living units. The total number of units proposed is 300
and total density is 5.4 units per acre for the overall site.
Net Change in Dwelling Units
# of Units Density (du/acre)
Current Total 247 4.45
Demo -136 --
Replacement +189 --
Proposed Total 300 5.4
Net Change: +53 units
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 4
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 5 of 20
The modification also includes a new road addition connecting the east and west sides of the
property; enhancement to existing indoor amenity spaces; replacement of a 1,590 square foot
hobby shop; relocation and expansion of a 6,092 square foot maintenance building; and new
outdoor amenities.
Conceptual Site Plan (Includes Staff Markups)
The majority of the renovation and expansion work will take place on the eastern half of the
property. In order to allow existing residents to remain on the property throughout construction,
the development will occur over three phases. The total number of units on the site is expected
to temporarily exceed 300 and be up to a total of 330 during Phases 1 and 2 to allow all
current residents to stay in a unit on-site until new units are available. The maximum number of
units at project completion will be 300.
Infrastructure modifications, including the street connection and stormwater improvements, are
slated to be included in Phase 1.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 5
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 6 of 20
Project Phasing Plan (Includes Staff Markups)
The existing stormwater infrastructure includes a retention pond located in the center of the
campus and a retention pond along the southeastern corner. Two new stormwater facilities are
proposed in the northeastern portion of the project area.
New outdoor amenities include two pickleball courts, a dog park, a community garden area,
gazebo, and new water features.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant is not proposing a change in the use of the property, which will remain a
Senior Living: Continuing Care Retirement Community and is allowed in the R-20 district with
a Special Use Permit.
Unified Development Ordinance standards for Continuing Care Retire Communities include
height, setbacks, open space, buffers, and parking requirements. The applicant has
addressed general compliance with these standards as demonstrated by the conceptual site
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 6
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 7 of 20
plan and project narrative (Applicant Exhibit A). A full review of these standards will be
conducted by the Technical Review Committee should the SUP modification application be
approved.
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
TRANSPORTATION
Access to the site is provided by the development’s existing private street, Plantation Village
Drive, which directly connects onto Porters Neck Road, a state-maintained Minor Collector
road.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 7
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 8 of 20
Access to Plantation Village
An additional service access is provided by Jeanelle Moore Blvd, which is located
approximately 1,200 feet from Porters Neck Road along Champ Davis Road. This access
serves as the main point of ingress and egress for nursing care service trips supplied by the
Davis Community. It is gated and, according to the applicant, allows emergency responder
use as well as resident access.
According to the applicant, delivery vehicles will utilize the main access onto Porters Neck
Road, and additional supplies and refuse will be included in the current number of deliveries
and pick-ups. Plantation Village staff work on a variety of shifts, but there is no major shift
change during the traditional AM and PM peak traffic hours.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 8
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 9 of 20
Porters Neck Road Entrance Jeanelle Moore Blvd Gate
The applicant’s traffic consultant, Davenport Engineering, has provided a Technical
Memorandum to assess the number of projected peak hour trips and any related traffic
impacts. As proposed, the expansion is estimated to generate 23 peak hour AM trips and
32 peak hour PM trips, which is not expected to change the level of service for any of the
nearby intersections.
Comparison of Trip Generation Scenarios - Source: Davenport Technical Memorandum
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: 247 senior adult housing units 55 AM / 69 PM
Proposed Development: 300 senior adult housing units 78 AM / 101 PM
Net Change: +23 AM / +32 PM
As the number of anticipated trips does not equal or exceed 100 peak hour trips for this
modification, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required. However, the applicant’s
Technical Memorandum concludes that the proposed expansion will have relatively minimal
impact on nearby road capacity, with no queueing issues at nearby intersections and less
than a second increase in delay. No improvements are recommended by Davenport
Engineering.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 9
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 10 of 20
Intersections studied in the Davenport Technical Memorandum
The applicant’s Technical Memorandum analyzed potential traffic impacts of the project at the
Porters Neck roundabout, intersection of Porters Neck Road and Champ Davis Road, and the
Plantation Village entrance onto Porters Neck Road, in order to identify transportation
improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic
and new development traffic. The report found that the proposed development is not expected
to lower the level of service of any of the studied intersections, nor increase the delay of any
studied intersection by more than 0.3 seconds per vehicle.
Staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for nearby sections of Porters Neck Road.
While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of
the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through
intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of
Service of a roadway. However, the available volume to capacity data indicates capacity
currently exists in this area to support the expected additional traffic.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (2018 AADT) – Source: WMPO
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
Porters Neck Road West of Porters Neck
Road roundabout 14,500 17,000 0.85
Porters Neck Road East of Porters Neck
Road roundabout 4,100 12,500 0.33
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 10
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 11 of 20
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
STIP Project U-4751 (Military Cutoff Extension)
o Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to I-140.
o The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed by early
2023.
o The project will also install a sidewalk and multi-use path along the extension of
Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project.
STIP Project U-4902D (Market Street Median)
o Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street
from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways
will consist of a 10-foot multi-use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5-
foot sidewalk on the western side of the street.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 11
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 12 of 20
o The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed by early
2023.
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed
Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. The Oaks at
Murray Farm*
204 Apartments
34 Duplex Units
62 Single-Family Dwellings
Approved August 5, 2019
Phase 1 & 2: 2020 Build Out
Year
Full Build 2022
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of a second westbound right-turn lane on “Old” Market Street at Hwy 17
Revising signal plan to modify phase at the Hwy 17 and “Old” Market Street intersection.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Waterstone
Development Status: No construction has occurred at this time.
*The TIA analyzed 406 dwelling units on the subject site. Shown are the 300 units approved by the Board of
Commissioners.
Proposed
Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Waterstone 151 Single-Family
Dwellings
Approved June 18, 2015
2020 Build Out Year
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of a southbound right turn lane on Edgewater Club Road at the site’s northern
access.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
Porters Neck Elementary
Development Status: 98 lots have been platted at this time. The right turn lane has been
installed.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 12
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 13 of 20
ENVIRONMENTAL
The property does not contain any Natural Heritage Areas or Special Flood Hazard Area.
The western, northern, and eastern portions of the site fall within the Futch Creek (SA, HQW)
watershed, while the southern and central portions of the site drain into the Intracoastal
Waterway.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class I (suitable/slight limitations), Class II (moderate limitations) and
Class III (severe limitations) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services.
CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY
The subject property has been used as an independent senior living community since 1983.
The site is located immediately east of The Davis Community, a senior living facility of
approximately 67.38 acres that has operated in the Porters Neck community for 53 years.
The Davis Community site contains a 3-story 35’ assisted living structure. In June 2020, the
Davis Community obtained a Conditional Use District rezoning to allow an expansion of its
campus, including a four-story 50’ tall multi-family building.
The subject property is also adjacent to two private recreation uses: the Porters Neck
Plantation golf course and maintenance facility to the east, and the Eagle Point Golf Club
to the south.
The northern property boundary abuts approximately 18 single-family dwellings of the
Porters Neck Plantation, which will be screened by the 20-foot vegetative, opaque buffer
required by the UDO.
Existing Vegetative Buffer along Northern Property Boundary
The conceptual site plan for Plantation Village positions the 3-story buildings away from the
existing single-family dwellings to the north (the nearest of which is approximately 270’
away from the northern property line) and further south adjacent to the golf courses. This
locates the 2-story buildings and the nonresidential structures closest to the homes. All of the
proposed buildings will exceed the minimum setback requirements of the UDO.
Senior living retirement communities generally generate less traffic than non-age restricted
residential developments.
Senior living retirement communities generally do not impact the school system.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 13
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 14 of 20
Plantation Village
Plantation Village
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 14
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 15 of 20
Representative Developments of Senior Living Projects:
Carolina Bay at Autumn Hall Brightmore
Brightmore
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 15
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 16 of 20
Plantation Village (Southern apartment building - to remain)
Representative Developments of R-20:
Emerald Forest Emerald Forest
Vineyard Plantation Middle Point
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 16
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 17 of 20
Middle Point
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type General Residential
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 17
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 18 of 20
Place Type
Description
Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic and commercial
services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses
should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while
recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses
include single-family residential, low-density multi-family residential, light
commercial, civic, and recreational.
Analysis
The subject property is the existing Plantation Village senior living
community, a continuing care retirement community located on Porters Neck
Road. The primary access to the property is along Porters Neck Road via
Plantation Village Drive, the site’s existing private driveway. The site also
utilizes Jeanelle Moore Blvd as a service entrance, connecting it with the
Davis Community.
Adjacent land uses include single-family dwellings of the Porters Neck
Plantation subdivision to the north, Porters Neck Plantation maintenance
facility and golf course to the east, Eagle Point Golf Club to the south, and
The Davis Community senior care campus to the west, which obtained a
Conditional Use District rezoning in June 2020 to allow for an expansion of
their facility.
Like the majority of the Porters Neck area east of the Market
Street/Highway 17 corridor, the subject property has been designated as
a General Residential area in the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of this
place type is to preserve existing residential neighborhoods and provide
opportunities for similar lower density housing and associated services. The
Comprehensive Plan indicates that single family residential and duplexes
are typical, but it also lists multi-family residential (including the type of
retirement community proposed) as appropriate for this place type.
Plantation Village has been located on this site for 37 years and was in
place prior to much of the single-family development in the Porters Neck
area. The proposed modification continues the senior living use currently on
the site. In addition, all of the proposed buildings are consistent with the
preferred height range of up to 3 stories in the General Residential place
type, and will exceed the setbacks required by the ordinance. The
modification proposes a total density (including existing units) of 5.4 units
per acre. This is within the intended residential density range of up to
approximately 8 units per acre provided for by the General Residential
place type.
STAFF PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT:
Staff has conducted an analysis of the proposed use and the information provided as part of the
application package and has created preliminary findings of fact for each of the conclusions
required to be reached to approve the special use permit request. These preliminary findings of
fact and conclusions are based solely on the information provided to date, prior to any information
or testimony in support or opposition to the request that may be presented at the upcoming public
hearing at the Board meeting.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 18
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 19 of 20
Conclusion 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health
or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved.
A. Water and sewer service is currently provided by CFPUA.
B. The site will be accessed from Porters Neck Road, an NCDOT-maintained Minor Collector
based on the WMPO Functional Classification Map.
C. According to the applicant’s transportation technical memorandum, the proposed
modification is estimated to result in a less than one second delay per vehicle at all nearby
studied intersections.
D. According to the applicant’s transportation technical memorandum, the proposed
modification is not expected to result in a change in level of service along Porters Neck
Road.
E. The subject property is located in the New Hanover County Northern Fire Service District.
F. The site is not located within the Special Flood Hazard Area.
Conclusion 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications
of the Unified Development Ordinance.
A. The site is zoned R-20, Residential District.
B. Senior Living: Continuing Care Retirement Community is an allowed use by Special Use
Permit in the R-20 zoning district.
C. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) sets forth specific use standards for Senior
Living: Continuing Care Retirement Community, all of which are shown on the conceptual
plan and will be confirmed by the Technical Review Committee if the Special Use Permit
modification is granted.
Conclusion 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of
adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity.
A. The surrounding area contains recreation uses, single-family dwellings, and a Continuing
Care Retirement Community, The Davis Community, to the east.
B. Bufferyards must be provided between the development and adjacent properties.
C. To date, no evidence has been provided to show that the proposed development will
substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. Cal Morgan, MAI, SRA, AI-
GRS, is currently performing a property value impact analysis and will be present at the
Planning Board Hearing on 9/3/20 to present his findings.
Conclusion 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed
according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it
is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New
Hanover County.
A. Plantation Village has operated as a Nursing and Personal Care Facility since 1983. It has
been modified over the years, however it has been comprised of office, institutional, and
medical land uses since its inception.
B. No changes to the use of the property are proposed with this modification.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 19
S-603M Staff Report PB 9.3.2020 Page 20 of 20
C. The property is located in the General Residential place type as classified in the 2016
Comprehensive Plan.
D. The proposed modification will increase the number of dwelling units for a total number of
300 units, an overall density of 5.4 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the
recommended density of the General Residential place type.
Suggested Conditions
No conditions proposed.
EXAMPLE MOTIONS
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit
modification meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the
Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Note any conditions be added to the development:
[List Conditions]
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to recommend denial, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met]
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 20
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 5 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 6 - 2
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 2
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 3
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 5
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 6
EXHIBIT “A”
to Application for Modification to Special Use Permit S-603, 5/11
Project Narrative:
The Applicant and property owner, Plantation Village, Inc., is requesting a
modification of its existing Special Use Permit (S-603, 5/11) in order to allow a renovation
and expansion of the Plantation Village Continuing Care Retirement Community. The
Subject Property consists of 6 contiguous parcels totaling approximately ±55 acres,
located at or in the vicinity of 1200 Porters Neck Road, as generally shown below. The
purpose of the request is to allow Plantation Village to renovate and redevelop some of
its existing residential buildings, expand and improve amenities buildings, and continue
to offer a very high quality of life through housing alternatives and recreational
opportunities for New Hanover County’s growing senior population.
Plantation Village is a non-profit retirement community offering independent living
and access to a continuum of care for residents as needed. The community is located
on a tranquil and beautifully landscaped campus, which offers residents dining, salon
services, indoor and outdoor recreational opportunities and classes, a fitness center,
library, resident care center and many other amenities. Plantation Village and its
residents have been a vital part of the Porters Neck community since the 1980s.
Plantation Village was originally granted a Special Use Permit in 1983 as a Nursing
& Personal Care Facility under the New Hanover County Zoning ordinance existing at
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 7
that time. Modifications to the original Special Use Permit were made over time, and in
2011 the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners issued the existing Special Use
Permit for the facility as a Continuing Care Retirement Community to replace the previous
Special Use Permit and more accurately reflect the use under updated zoning ordinances.
The Applicant is requesting a modification to the existing Special Use Permit to
allow for the renovation and expansion of its existing facilities. As illustrated on the
proposed revised Master Plan, the plan includes a net increase of 54 independent living
homes, enhancements to existing indoor amenity spaces, replacement of a hobby shop
and maintenance building, and new outdoor/game amenities.
The master plan contemplates replacing the east side of the community
independent living homes, while maintaining at the end of all the phases a total of 300
independent living units at the community. To accomplish this, during the first phases
more units will be added than demolished which results in a maximum of 330 units on site
at the end of phase 2A (the “Phase 2 surplus”). In the subsequent phases less units will
be built than what is being replaced. This will in turn reduce the total number of units at
the end of the completed project to 300 units. Thus, the maximum number of residential
units requested is 330 (during the Phase 2 surplus).
The Phase 2 surplus will result in a temporary increase of an additional
approximately 1.5 units per acre over the current density. By the conclusion of the project
once surplus units are removed the project will result in 300 total residential units (an
addition of less than 1 unit per acre than is currently permitted under the existing Special
Use Permit). This density is consistent with the General Residential Future Land Use
placetype and will allow Plantation Village to serve more residents in New Hanover
County’s growing senior population.
Existing Master Plan
(2011)
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 8
Proposed Master Plan (2020)
Criteria Required for Approval of a Special Use Permit
1.The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located
where proposed and approved.
The proposed use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located
where proposed and approved. The best evidence of this is Plantation Village’s long
history and outstanding reputation through the region. Plantation Village has existed and
operated for decades on its current campus with no negative impacts on public health or
safety, and no negative impacts to neighboring property owners and uses. On the
contrary, Plantation Village has been an asset to the Porters Neck area for more than 30
years.
Additionally, it should be noted that in 2011, in granting the existing Special Use
Permit, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners found that the use would not
materially endanger the public health or safety if located and developed according to the
existing Master Plan. No change in the type of use is proposed with this modification
request. As stated above, the proposed expansion generally consists of the renovation
and relocation of some buildings within the existing campus and a slight density increase
(along with required parking for same) as illustrated in the proposed revised Master Plan.
Plantation Village has adequate existing services and utilities, including sewer,
water, electrical, garbage collections, and fire protection. The community adheres to all
applicable State and County health and safety regulations and fire codes, and the
Residential Care Center provides nurses available 24/7 for residents.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 9
With respect to anticipated traffic impacts, the increased density proposed is relatively
low, and because this is a retirement community, it is anticipated that residents are less
likely to travel at AM and PM peak traffic hours. Additionally, Plantation Village does not
have any impact on student enrollment to the New Hanover County school system.
The existing Plantation Village site has a NCDEQ State Stormwater Permit (SW8
030203) which was originally issued in 2003 and was modified in 2013. Stormwater
treatment occurs in one on-site retention pond and one on-site infiltration basin. The
retention pond has excess capacity to treat up to 64,573 square feet of new impervious
surface and the infiltration basin has excess capacity to treat up to 42,233 square feet of
new impervious surface. Because the areas draining to the existing stormwater features
will have impervious area removed and replaced with impervious surfaces within the
existing permitted parameters there will not be any modification to the existing features.
Based on the proposed Master Plan there will be an increase in impervious surface
in the currently undeveloped portion of the site. A new stormwater infiltration basin is
proposed that will meet or exceed both NCDEQ and New Hanover County requirements.
2.The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified
Development Ordinance.
As illustrated by the proposed revised Master Plan, the proposed Special Use
Permit modification meets the requirements of UDO Sec. 4.3.2.2. as follows:
•A minimum lot size of 20 acres.
•Minimum parking spaces of 1.5 per independent living unit plus one space
per employee on the largest shift.
•Maximum impervious area will not exceed 40% for the total development.
•There are no commercial uses on site. All amenities are private amenities
for the benefit of the residents of the CCRC.
•Height will not exceed 50 feet.
•Plantation Village is served by sewer and water utilities through Cape Fear
Public Utility Authority.
•The proposed modification will meet all open space and improved
recreational space requirements.
•The modification will meet all buffering and setback requirements.
•Porters Neck Road is a Collector Road as designated on the WMPO
Functional Road Classification Map.
•All other applicable required local state or federal permits or authorizations
will be met.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 10
3.The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting
property, or that the use is a public necessity.
The proposed use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting
property. As the New Hanover County Commissioners found in the issuance of the
existing Special Use Permit in 2011, “[t]he proposed use is a continuation and expansion
of existing uses on the campus.” The proposed modification is not substantially different
from that previous request. The use and operation of the facility will remain the same
with some renovations, replacements and expansions of existing buildings, a slight
increase in density, and an increase in parking to meet the requirements for the new units.
For decades, Plantation Village has been a vital part of the Porters Neck
community and a good neighbor. The properties adjacent to the east and to the south
across Porters Neck Road are golf courses and residential golf course communities. The
property adjacent to the west is an assisted living and nursing home facility. To the north
of the project area is Hunters Green Phases I and II, a single-family residential
neighborhood. Based upon the Hunters Green Phase I subdivision map (Map Book 35
at Page 132, New Hanover County Registry), the lots in Hunters Green Phase I average
approximately 8,471 sq. ft. (rounding up). Based upon the Hunters Green Phase II
subdivision map (Map Book 35 at Page 133, New Hanover County Registry), the lots in
Hunters Green Phase II average approximately 9,823 sq. ft. (rounding up). The proposed
density of the Special Use Permit Modification is only a slight increase over what is
currently permitted under the existing Special Use Permit. This proposed slight increase
in density will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property.
4.The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located
and in general conformity with the New Hanover County Comprehensive Land Use
Plan.
The proposed modification is in harmony with the area. Plantation Village is an
existing residential use that provides additional alternative housing types for seniors in
the County. Plantation Village’s campus has been in existence for decades and is an
integral part of the Porters Neck Community. As seen in the photos below it is a beautiful
campus that is very well maintained and carefully landscaped for the enjoyment of
residents and their guests. It offers:
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 11
Aesthetically pleasing entrance and streetview.
Very high-quality community buildings and water features.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 12
Beautifully designed residences and open spaces.
Landscaped walking trails.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 13
Opportunities to enjoy nature.
The Plantation Village campus is an example of careful planning, consideration
and preservation of green space and is an asset to the Porters Neck area. It
complements the surrounding neighborhoods and golf courses.
Additionally, the proposed modification is consistent with the New Hanover County
Comprehensive Plan. The Subject Property, along with the surrounding area is
designated as a “General Residential” placetype on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Map. As illustrated below, the General Residential placetype is intended for
residential uses (including low-density multi-family residential) as well as recreational
uses, both of which Plantation Village provides to its residents. Additionally, the ideal
density for low-density multi- and single-family residential is 1-6 du/acre, which is
consistent with the requested modification. Comprehensive Plan: Visualizing the Future
p.5 states “[t]he ideal density for multi- and single family residential is low (ranging up to
approximately eight units per acre).”
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 14
The proposal is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal of providing a
range of housing types, opportunities and choices and is consistent with the following
implementation guidelines:
•XV.A.3 Review zoning regulations where appropriate to accommodate populations
with special needs such as the elderly and disabled.
•XVIII.A.2 Encourage the inclusion of areas for physical activity in the design of
residential open space areas.
•XX.B.1 Sidewalks, pedestrian amenities, and residential common areas should be
designed to be inclusive of persons with limited mobility.
•IX.D.2 Encourage infill development to maximize use of previously developed sites
for highest and best use.
In summary, the proposed modification to the existing Special Use Permit meets
all of the required Special Use Permit criteria, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,
allows Plantation Village to improve its community spaces and residences and supports
the need for housing alternatives for the County’s growing senior population.
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 15
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 16
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 17
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 18
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 19
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 20
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 21
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 22
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 23
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 24
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
3
-
7
-
2
5
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
,
2
0
2
0
IT
E
M
:
3
-
7
-
2
6
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 27
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 28
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 29
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 30
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 31
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 32
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 33
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 34
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 35
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 36
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 37
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 38
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 39
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 40
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 41
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 42
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 8 - 2
WETLANDS
WETLAN
D
S
POND
WETLAN
D
S
DO
G P
A
R
K
GARDENS
WATER FEATURE
COVER
E
D
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
GRASS
PAVERS
COVERED PARKING
COVERED WALKWAYS
30 COVERED
PARKING
SPACES
8 COVEREDPARKINGSPACES
40 COVEREDPARKING
SPACES
GAZEBO
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
PROPOSEDSTORMWATERFEATURE
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
IN
F
I
L
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
B
A
S
I
N
WETLAN
D
S
DO
G P
A
R
K
GARDENS
WATER FEATURE
COVER
E
D
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
GRASS
PAVERS
COVERED PARKING
COVERED WALKWAYS
30 COVERED
PARKING
SPACES
8 COVEREDPARKINGSPACES
40 COVEREDPARKING
SPACES
GAZEBO
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
EXISTINGSTORMWATERPOND
PROPOSEDSTORMWATERFEATURE
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
IN
F
I
L
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
B
A
S
I
N
E
NGIN E E R
PR O F E S SIO
N
A
L
J
O
H
N
PHILL I P N O R RIS
NO R T H C ARO
L
I
N
A
VICINITY MAP
PL
A
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
MA
S
T
E
R
P
L
A
N
C1
NE
W
H
A
N
O
V
E
R
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
N
O
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
OW
N
E
R
:
19120
PL
A
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
I
N
C
.
12
0
0
P
O
R
T
E
R
S
N
E
C
K
R
D
.
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
8
4
0
1
Licence #C-3641
14
2
9
A
S
H
-
L
I
T
T
L
E
R
I
V
E
R
R
D
.
N
W
AS
H
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
0
PH
O
N
E
(
9
1
0
)
2
8
7
-
5
9
0
0
NO
R
R
I
S
&
T
U
N
S
T
A
L
L
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
P
.
C
.
26
0
2
I
R
O
N
G
A
T
E
D
R
.
,
S
U
I
T
E
1
0
2
WI
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
8
4
1
2
PH
O
N
E
(
9
1
0
)
3
4
3
-
9
6
5
3
SCALE: 1" = 100'
PROTECTED TREES:
SIGNIFICANT TREES:
6
5
78
9
10
11
2
3
1
12
13
4
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 9 - 1
DO
G
P
A
R
K
GA
R
D
E
N
S
OU
T
D
O
O
R
AC
T
I
V
I
T
Y
A
R
E
A
WA
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
GR
A
S
S
PA
V
E
R
S
CO
V
E
R
E
D
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
30 COVEREDPARKINGSPACES 8 COVERE
D
PARKINGSPACES40 COVEREDPARKINGSPACES
GA
Z
E
B
O
ENGIN
E
E
R
PR
O
F
E
S
SIONAL
JOHN PHILL
I
P
N
O
R
RIS
NO
R
T
H
C
AROLINA
PROGRESS DRAWINGN
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
VICINITY MAP
PLANTATION VILLAGE
SIGNIFICANT TREE IMPACTST
-
1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE 1,2, AND 3
OWNER:
19
1
2
0
-Plantation Village Inc.
-1200 Porters Neck Rd.
-Wilmington, NC 28401
Li
c
e
n
c
e
#
C
-
3
6
4
1
1429 ASH-LITTLE RIVER RD. NW
ASH, NC 28420
PHONE (910) 287-5900
NORRIS & TUNSTALL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.C.
2602 IRON GATE DR., SUITE 102
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
PHONE (910) 343-9653
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
S
T
-
2
SIGNIFICANT TREES:TYPICAL TREE SYMBOLS
SC
A
L
E
:
1
"
=
4
0
'
Planning Board - September 3, 2020ITEM: 3- 9 - 2
AC
T
I
V
I
T
Y
A
R
E
A
WA
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
CO
V
E
R
E
D
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
ENGIN
E
E
R
PR
O
F
E
S
SIONAL
JOHN PHILL
I
P
N
O
R
RIS
NO
R
T
H
C
AROLINA
PROGRESS DRAWINGN
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
VICINITY MAP
PLANTATION VILLAGE
SIGNIFICANT TREE IMPACTST
-
2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE 1,2, AND 3
OWNER:
19
1
2
0
-Plantation Village Inc.
-1200 Porters Neck Rd.
-Wilmington, NC 28401
Li
c
e
n
c
e
#
C
-
3
6
4
1
1429 ASH-LITTLE RIVER RD. NW
ASH, NC 28420
PHONE (910) 287-5900
NORRIS & TUNSTALL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.C.
2602 IRON GATE DR., SUITE 102
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
PHONE (910) 343-9653
SIGNIFICANT TREES:
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
S
T
-
1
SCALE: 1" = 40'TYPICAL TREE SYMBOLSPlanning Board - September 3, 2020ITEM: 3- 9 - 3
PLANTATION VILLAGE COMMUNITY EXPANSION | FULL PHASE | RENDERED MASTER PLAN | WILMINGTON, NC | 07.08.2020
BLUE
H
E
R
O
N
D
R
.
E
BLUE HERO
N
D
R
.
W
BL
U
E
H
E
R
O
N
D
R
.
W
PL
A
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
D
R
.
HUMMINGBIRD LN.
JEA
N
E
L
L
A
M
O
O
R
E
B
L
V
D
.
JEA
N
E
L
L
A
M
O
O
R
E
B
L
V
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
L
A
R
K
L
N
PORTER’S NECK RD. (S.R. 1491)
KEY LEGEND
1. COMMONS BUILDING
EXPANSION / RENOVATION
2. HERON COVE
3. MAGNOLIA WALK
4A. MAINTENANCE FACILITY
4B. CUTTING EDGE
5. CENTRAL BARK
6. PICKLEBALL COURTS
7. COMMUNITY GARDEN
8. EGRET LANDING
9. PUTTING GREEN
10. THE MERIDIAN
11. RESIDENT ACTIVITY AREA
12. SEASONAL GARDEN
13. OPAQUE TRANSITIONAL BUFFER
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4A
4B
5
6
7
13
8
9
10
10
10
11
12
0'25'50'100'0'25'50'100'
Planning Board - September 3, 2020
ITEM: 3 - 9 - 4