HomeMy WebLinkAboutDECEMBER MEETING AGENDA PACKET
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC 28401
Members of the Board
Donna Girardot, Chair | Paul Boney, Vice-Chair
Thomas 'Jordy' Rawl | Ernest Olds | Jeffrey B. Petroff | H. Allen Pope | Colin J. Tarrant
Wayne Clark, Director of Planning & Land Use | Ken Vafier, Planning Manager
DECEMBER 3, 2020 6:00 PM
Mee5ng Called to Order by Chair, Donna Girardot
Pledge of Allegiance by Planning Manager, Ken Vafier
Approval of Minutes
REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The Planning Board may consider substanal changes in these peons as a result of objecons, debate,
and discussion at the meeng, including rezoning to other classificaons.
1 Quasi-Judicial Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S20-05) – Request by Design Solu=ons, on behalf of the property
owner, CWEST, LLC, for a Special Use Permit to expand and operate a campground and
recrea=onal vehicle (RV) park within the R-15, Residen=al District, located at 9515 River
Road.
2 Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z20-22) – Request by Coastal Land Design, PLLC on behalf of property
owner, Preserva=on Point Partners, LLC to rezone approximately 71.36 acres of land located
in the 1500 block of Castle Hayne Road from I-2, Heavy Industrial District, to R-15, Residen=al
District.
OTHER ITEMS
1 Long Range Planning Update
2 Complete Communi5es Strategic Goal Presenta5on
3 Approval of 2021 Mee5ng Calendar
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ken Vafier, Planning Supervisor
CONTACT(S): Ken Vafier; Rebekah Roth, Interim Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Quasi-Judicial Hearing
Special Use Permit Request (S20-05) – Request by Design Solu6ons, on behalf of the property owner, CWEST, LLC,
for a Special Use Permit to expand and operate a campground and recrea6onal vehicle (RV) park within the R-15,
Residen6al District, located at 9515 River Road.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is reques$ng a special use permit to expand Snows Cut RV Park, which is an exis$ng campground and
recrea$onal vehicle (RV) park ini$ally approved on 3.6 acres in 2018. The proposed expansion is on a 4.2 acre parcel
directly west of the exis$ng park, and consists of the addi$on of 28 spaces, a second bath house, and a third access
point to River Road.
Access is proposed to be provided to River Road from the subject property at three points. Two access points to River
Road were approved with Phase I, and visitors will be able to access this phase internally through an extension of one
exis$ng access point to the east, while a new access point to the south of the “T” shaped parcel is proposed. A
driveway permit from NCDOT is required for the third access point. The proposed expansion is an$cipated to
generate an addi$onal 9 AM and 13 PM peak hour trips. Traffic Impact Analyses are required to be completed for
proposals that will generate more than 100 peak hour trips in either the AM or PM peak hours. A TIA is not required
for this project due to the minimal projected peak hour trip genera$on figures, however, proposed access points will be
reviewed through the county’s Technical Review Commi>ee.
The property to the north of the subject site has been used as a campground/RV park since the early 1960’s, and this
proposal would provide an expansion of the first phase of Snows Cut RV Park, which was approved on the property to
the east in 2018. The proper$es on the remaining boundaries are currently undeveloped. The loca$on is within close
proximity to recrea$onal opportuni$es including Snows Cut Park, Carolina Beach State Park, and a>rac$ons in
Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and Fort Fisher.
The 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan classifies the subject property as General Residen$al. The intent of this place
type is to provide opportuni$es for lower density residen$al development and suppor$ve commercial, civic, and
recrea$onal development. While recrea$onal uses are encouraged in General Residen$al areas, uses such as RV parks
and campgrounds are not specifically addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. However, these uses are common in
many communi$es along the North Carolina coast, including New Hanover County, and can support tourism and public
access to water and natural resources.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth & Economic DevelopmentEncourage development of complete communi$es in the unincorporated
countyCi$zens have daily needs met by NHC businesses and support them
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Example Mo6on for Approval:
Mo$on to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this applica$on for a Special Use Permit meets the four
required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any addi$onal findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Note any condi$ons be added to the development:
Suggested Condi
on:
1. Consistent with the Special Use Permit approval for the previous phase of Snows Cut RV Park, no camping
ac$vity of any kind can occur in any required bufferyard or in the 15-foot access easement that runs along the
northern property line of the subject site.
Example Mo6on for Denial:
Mo$on to recommend denial, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required condi$ons and specifica$ons of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substan$ally injure the value of adjoining or abuMng property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the applica
on does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met]
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1
SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application (S20-05)
Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, CWEST, LLC, for a Special Use Permit to expand
and operate a campground and recreational vehicle (RV) park within the R-15, Residential District, located at
9515 River Road.
1. Swear witnesses: Announce that “the Special Use Permit process requires a quasi-judicial hearing; therefore,
any person wishing to testify must be sworn in. All persons who signed in to speak and wish to present
competent and material testimony please step forward to be sworn in. Thank you.”
2. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal.
3. Conduct hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
4. Close the hearing
5. Board discussion
6. Ask Applicant whether he/she agrees with staff findings.
7. Vote on the Special Use Permit application.
Motion to approve the permit - All findings are positive.
Motion to approve the permit, subject to conditions specified below:
(State Conditions)
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Motion to deny the permit because the Board cannot find:
a. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where
proposed for the following reason:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
b. That the use meets all required condition and specifications:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
c. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that
the use is a public necessity:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1
d. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted
and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general
conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required
conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Also, that the following conditions be added to the development:
Suggested Condition:
1. Consistent with the Special Use Permit approval for the previous phase of Snows Cut RV Park No camping
activity of any kind can occur in any required bufferyard or in the 15-foot access easement that runs
along the northern property line of the subject site.
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons to why it is not being met]
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 2
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 1 of 12
STAFF REPORT FOR S20-05
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: S20-05
Request:
SUP to operate a Campground/Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park in the R-15, Residential District
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Design Solutions CWEST, LLC
Location: Acreage:
9515 River Road 4.2 acres
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R08800-001-007-000 General Residential
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped, Single-Family Residential Campground/Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park
Current Zoning:
R-15
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Campground/Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park (Carolina
Beach Family Campground) R-15
East Campground/Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park (Phase I of
Snows Cut RV Park) R-15
South Undeveloped/Recreational (Snows Cut Park) R-15
West Undeveloped R-15
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 2 of 12
ZONING HISTORY
April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 4)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Aqua water service, private septic systems
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire
District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station
Schools Carolina Beach Elementary, Murray Middle, and Ashley High Schools
Recreation Snows Cut Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No know conservation resources
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
• The applicant is seeking to obtain a special use permit to add an additional phase to the
Snows Cut RV Park consisting of 28 spaces, an additional bath house, and a third access
point to River Road to the south of the subject property.
• A Special Use Permit for Phase I of the park was approved in 2018 for 44 spaces on 3.6
acres directly to the east of the subject property. Currently, this phase is developed with
approximately 19 spaces, and the remainder of the spaces are expected to transition from
the previously existing mobile home sites to RV sites by the end of 2021.
• An existing single-family residence is located on the southern portion of the tract, and is
proposed to remain for longer-term rental, potentially for a park manager.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 3 of 12
Proposed Site Plan with Staff Markups
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• Campgrounds and RV parks require a special use permit in the R-15 zoning district and are
subject to supplemental standards within the county’s Unified Development Ordinance, which
generally address dimensional standards (setbacks, minimum space area, roadway
dimensions, etc.), access requirements, sanitation and utilities, open space, fire safety, and
registration.
• The subject property is adjacent to an existing campground to the north and Phase I of
Snows Cut RV Park to the east. The properties to the west and south of the “T” shaped
portion of the subject property are currently undeveloped and are zoned R-15.
Proposed Access
Point to River Road
Approved Phase I
of Snows Cut RV
Park
To River Rd
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 4 of 12
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
• There are currently no subdivisions under development in the vicinity of the subject
property in the unincorporated county.
Town of Carolina
Beach
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 5 of 12
TRANSPORTATION
• Access is proposed to be provided to River Road from the subject property at three points.
Two access points to River Road were approved with Phase I, and visitors will be able to
access this phase internally through an extension of the internal road network to the east,
while a new access point to the south of the “T” shaped parcel is proposed. A driveway
permit from NCDOT is required for the third access point.
Access Points to River Road in all Phases of Snows Cut RV Park
Phase I
Approved
Access Points
Proposed Access
Point
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 6 of 12
Access to Primary Arterial Routes
• The proposed expansion is anticipated to generate an additional 9 AM and 13 PM peak
hour trips. Traffic Impact Analyses are required to be completed for proposals that will
generate more than 100 peak hour trips in either the AM or PM peak hours. A TIA is not
required for this project due to the minimal projected peak hour trip generation figures,
however, proposed access points will be reviewed through the county’s Technical Review
Committee and will require a driveway permit from NCDOT.
• Because there have been no recent traffic impact analyses in the area addressing nearby
intersections, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for River Road near the
subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a
general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to
pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when
determining the Level of Service of a roadway. However, the available volume to
capacity data indicates capacity currently exists in this area to support the expected
additional traffic.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 7 of 12
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2019
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
River Road
9500 Block (Near
proposed southern
access point)
3,800 16,700 0.28
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. There
have not been any recent TIA’s in the vicinity of the subject site that would impact the nearby
transportation network expected to be used by development on this site.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 8 of 12
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
There are no nearby NC STIP Projects within the 1-mile radius of the subject property that include
improvements that affect this proposal.
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas, wetlands, or Natural
Heritage Areas.
• The subject property is within the Telfairs Creek (SC;Sw) watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on
the property consist of Class I (suitable/slight limitation) soils. The location of septic fields
as shown on the site plan will be subject to approval by New Hanover County Environmental
Health.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
SCHOOLS
• Under the county’s performance residential standards, the subject property could allow up
to 11 single-family dwelling units to be constructed at a density of 2.5 du/ac. Using the
generalized historic student generation rate, development under the current zoning district
can be estimated to generate approximately 3 students.
• Under the proposal, these units are not typically occupied by full time residents with
students in the school system as they will not be permanent units and are intended for
transient lodging.
CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY
• The property to the north of the subject site has been used as a campground/RV park since
the early 1960’s.
• A Special Use Permit for a campground/travel trailer park on the property to the east of
the subject site was approved by the Board of Commissioners in 2018, and this proposal
would provide an expansion of that facility.
• Adjacent properties to the west and south are currently undeveloped, and transitional
buffers will be required along common property boundaries to these properties.
• The location is within close proximity to recreational opportunities including Snows Cut Park,
Carolina Beach State Park, and attractions in Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and Fort Fisher.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 9 of 12
Representative Developments of Campgrounds/RV Parks
Phase I, Snows Cut RV Park Phase I, Snows Cut RV Park
Wilmington KOA Holiday, Market Street
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 10 of 12
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision
for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character
and function of the different types of development that make up the community. Specific goals of
the comprehensive plan are designated to be promoted in each place type, and other goals may
be relevant for particular properties.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type General Residential
Place Type
Description
Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic and commercial
services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses
should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while
recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses
include single-family residential, low-density multi-family residential, light
commercial, civic, and recreational.
Analysis
The intent of the General Residential place type is to provide opportunities
for lower density residential development and supportive commercial, civic,
and recreational development. Though recreational uses are encouraged
in General Residential areas, uses such as RV parks and campgrounds are
not specifically addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. However, these uses
are common in many communities along the North Carolina coast, including
New Hanover County, and can support tourism and public access to water
and natural resources.
The proposed RV park and campground is located immediately adjacent to
an existing campground and public recreation amenities. During their
consideration of the 2018 special use permit for the existing Snows Cut RV
Park, the Board of Commissioners found that the use aligned with the intent
of the General Residential land use classification, would provide
recreational opportunities, would have few impacts on existing residential
neighborhoods, and was generally compatible with the existing residential
and recreational development pattern in the area.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 11 of 12
STAFF PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT:
Staff has conducted an analysis of the proposed use and the information provided as part of the
application package and has created preliminary findings of fact for each of the conclusions
required to be reached to approve the special use permit request. These preliminary findings of
fact and conclusions are based solely on the information provided to date, prior to any information
or testimony in support or opposition to the request that may be presented at the upcoming public
hearing at the Board meeting.
Conclusion 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health
or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved.
A. The site is accessed from River Road, a minor arterial street that is operating with adequate
capacity to accommodate the projected number of trips from the proposed development.
B. A driveway permit must be obtained from NCDOT for the additional proposed access point
to River Road.
C. Water services must be provided and designed in accordance with Aqua’s standards.
Wastewater services must be provided and designed in accordance with DEQ Division of
Waste Management’s and NHC Environmental Health Services’ standards.
D. The subject property is located in the New Hanover County South Fire Service District.
E. The site is not located within any Special Flood Hazard Area.
Conclusion 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications
of the Unified Development Ordinance.
A. The site is zoned R-15, Residential District.
B. Campgrounds and RV Parks are allowed by special use permit in the R-15 zoning districts.
C. A site plan has been included as part of the special use permit application and demonstrates
that the requirements of the UDO will be met.
Conclusion 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of
adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity.
A. The surrounding land uses include an existing travel trailer park and low-density residential.
The subject property is not located adjacent to residential neighborhoods.
B. No evidence has been submitted that this project will decrease the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 11
S20-05 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 12 of 12
Conclusion 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed
according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it
is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New
Hanover County.
A. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the area proposed for the development as General
Residential, and the proposal aligns with the intent of this land use classification. The
proposal provides recreational opportunities, is not estimated to generate a large amount
of traffic on the roadway network, is an expansion of a previously approved RV park, and
is located next to an existing travel trailer park in an area containing few single-family
homes.
Suggested Condition
1. Consistent with the Special Use Permit approval for the previous phase of Snows Cut RV
Park, no camping activity of any kind can occur in any required bufferyard or in the 15-
foot access easement that runs along the northern property line of the subject site.
EXAMPLE MOTIONS
Example Motion for Approval:
Motion to recommend approval, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit
meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report.
[OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions.
[OPTIONAL] Note any conditions be added to the development:
[List Conditions]
Suggested Conditions:
1. Consistent with the Special Use Permit approval for the previous phase of Snows Cut
RV Park, no camping activity of any kind can occur in any required bufferyard or in
the 15-foot access easement that runs along the northern property line of the subject
site.
Example Motion for Denial:
Motion to recommend denial, as the Board cannot find that this proposal:
1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety;
2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance;
3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property;
4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with
the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County.
[State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met]
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 12
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020ITEM: 1- 9 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2020
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Gideon Smith, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Gideon Smith, Brad Schuler, Senior Planner, Rebekah Roth, Planning and Land Use Interim
Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z20-22) – Request by Coastal Land Design, PLLC on behalf of property owner, Preserva;on
Point Partners, LLC to rezone approximately 71.36 acres of land located in the 1500 block of Castle Hayne Road
from I-2, Heavy Industrial District, to R-15, Residen;al District.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property, approximately 71.36 acres, south of the Preserva+on Point
Subdivision from I-2 to R-15 in order to include it within the subdivision, as residen+al uses are not permi0ed in the I-2
district.
According to the applicant, the exis+ng lots adjacent to the subject property will be extended to the creeks and canals
that connect to Smith Creek and no addi+onal lots will be added to the subdivision if this rezoning is approved.
The subject property contains both swamp forest and brackish marsh. Due to these environmental features, addi+onal
restric+ons have been placed on development, including a conserva+on easement that encompasses the en+re
property. The purpose of the conserva+on easement is to maintain wetland and/or riparian resources and other
natural values within the area, and to prevent the use or development of the area.
In addi+on, the County’s performance residen+al standards do not allow marshlands to be included within net area of
subdivisions when determining the maximum units allowed for the development. The area that could be used for net
area would be determined if a modifica+on of the exis+ng subdivision plat is proposed. However, it would be unlikely
to result in a significant change to the exis+ng subdivision as 123 lots have been pla0ed and roadway infrastructure has
been installed.
The applicant excluded approximately 5 acres of the I-2 zoning designa+on on the subject property from this request in
order to limit poten+al impacts and addi+onal regula+ons on the adjacent remaining industrial land, as under current
county zoning regula+ons, industrial uses next to residen+al land are subject to addi+onal structure setbacks.
The areas where the proposed residen+al zoning abuts industrial land generally consist of environmental constraints
similar to the subject site, making any poten+al industrial development more likely to be closer to Castle Hayne Road
and to exceed any required setback from the new R-15 district.
As no addi+onal lots are being created or added to the subdivision, the es+mated number of peak hour trips
an+cipated with the proposed request is below the 100 peak hour trip threshold that triggers the ordinance
requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). In addi+on, the request is not expected to generate any addi+onal
trips outside of those generated by the Preserva+on Point residents and guests.
The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as Conserva+on. The proposed R-15 rezoning, in conjunc+on with the
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
conserva+on easement on file for the subject property, is generally CONSIS TENT with the goals of the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate designa+on than the exis+ng I-2, Heavy Industrial zoning, would
not allow addi+onal residen+al units to be built in this area, and would protect the site’s natural environment, water
quality, and wildlife habitats.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval and suggests the following mo+on:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate designa+on than the
exis+ng I-2 zoning, and with the conserva+on easement on record for the property, addi+onal protec+ons
are provided for the site’s natural environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats which restrict
development on the subject site. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the
public interest because the request removes an industrial zoning designa+on from land that is
environmentally sensi+ve and offers increased protec+on to the adjacent residen+al property and
wetlands. In addi+on, the boundary of the proposed rezoning was designed to limit addi+onal regula+ons
on the adjacent remaining industrial property.
Example Mo;on for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the
purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate designa+on than the
exis+ng I-2 zoning, and with the conserva+on easement on record for the property, addi+onal protec+ons
are provided for the site’s natural environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats which restrict
development on the subject site, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because the proposal is not consistent with the surrounding community and the use will adversely
impact the adjacent proper+es.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2
SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z20-22)
Request by Coastal Land Design, PLLC on behalf of property owner, Preservation Point Partners, LLC
to rezone approximately 71.36 acres of land located in the 1500 block of Castle Hayne Road from I-
2, Heavy Industrial District, to R-15, Residential District.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for
rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate
designation than the existing I-2 zoning, and with the conservation easement on record for the
property, additional protections are provided for the site’s natural environment, water quality,
and wildlife habitats which restrict development on the subject site. I also find APPROVAL of
the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the request removes an
industrial zoning designation from land that is environmentally sensitive and offers increased
protection to the adjacent residential property and wetlands. In addition, the boundary of the
proposed rezoning was designed to limit additional regulations on the adjacent remaining
industrial property.
Example Motion of Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate
designation than the existing I-2 zoning, and with the conservation easement on record for the
property, additional protections are provided for the site’s natural environment, water quality,
and wildlife habitats which restrict development on the subject site, I find DENIAL of the
rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent
with the surrounding community and the use will adversely impact the adjacent properties.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to [Approve/Deny] the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. I find it to be
[Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert
reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 1 of 12
STAFF SUMMARY OF Z20-22
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z20-22
Request:
Rezoning to an R-15 district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Frank Braxton of Coastal Land Design Preservation Point Partnership, LLC
Location: Acreage:
1500-1600 block of Castle Hayne Road 71.36
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
Portions of R04100-001-150-000 &
R04100-001-002-000 Conservation
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped
The property would be allowed to be developed in
accordance with the R-15 district. However, it is
subject to an existing conservation easement that
prohibits development within the property.
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
I-2, Heavy Industrial R-15, Residential
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single-Family Residential (Future Preservation Point
Subdivision & Community Boating Facility), Utility Lines R-15, (CUD) R-15
East Vehicle Service Station, Electric Substation I-2
South
Telecommunication Tower, Undeveloped, Vehicle
Service Station, Contractor Office, Building and
Construction Supplies Retail Sales, Commercial Services
I-2,
IND (City of Wilmington)
West
Future Preservation Point Subdivision & Community
Boating Facility, Smith Creek, NE Cape Fear River,
Undeveloped
R-15, (CUD) R-15,
IND (City of Wilmington)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 2 of 12
ZONING HISTORY
July 1, 1972 Initially zoned I-2 (Area 9A)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Wrightsboro Station
Schools Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High
Schools
Recreation Optimist Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
Conservation resource maps indicate that the subject property contains both
swamp forest and brackish mash, which are subject to the conservation
resources standards. Although the residential lots will extend into these
conservation resources, this entire area was recorded as a Conservation
Easement (MB 68/PGs 388-389), and is subject to conservation covenants,
conditions, and restrictions (DB 6375/PGs 2757-2764) that limit
development on the subject property.
Historic The marsh areas of the property were once used for rice production.
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 3 of 12
HISTORY OF PRESERVATION POINT
In 2017, a preliminary plan for a performance residential development consisting of 98 lots
(Preservation Point – formerly River Breeze) was approved for multiple parcels directly to
the north of the subject site. Later that same year, the area to the northwest of the subject
site was rezoned to a Conditional Use R-15 district and a Special Use Permit was issued for
a community boating facility located in the Northeast Cape Fear River consisting of 98 boat
slips (Z17-09).
Following the approval of the community boating facility, the area to the northeast of the
subject site was rezoned from I-2 to R-15 and B-2 in 2019 to expand the development,
establish an additional access point, and provide commercial uses to the Preservation Point
residents and surrounding community.
Below: Subject Site and the Adjacent Subdivision.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property, approximately 71.36 acres, south
of the Preservation Point Subdivision from I-2 to R-15 in order to include it within the
subdivision, as residential uses are not permitted in the I-2 district. According to the
applicant, the existing lots adjacent to the subject property will be extended to the creeks
and canals that connect to Smith Creek and no additional lots will be added to the
subdivision if this rezoning is approved.
The conservation resource map indicates that the subject property contains both swamp
forest and brackish marsh. Due to these environmental features, additional restrictions have
been placed on development, including a conservation easement that encompasses the
entire property.
According to the Conservation Declaration, the purpose of the conservation easement
(“area”) is to maintain wetland and/or riparian resources and other natural values within
the area, and to prevent the use or development of the area. The Conservation Declaration
does, however, exempt the construction and related use to the boardwalk, kayak/canoe
launches, and boat slip accesses that are associated with the community boating facility and
amenity island for the subdivision. The conservation easement does not restrict the public
from accessing navigable waters of the Unites States or any surface waters within the area.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 4 of 12
Below: Approximate Location of Conservation Easement and Remaining I-2 Zoning
In addition, the County’s performance residential standards do not allow marshlands to be
included within net area of subdivisions when determining the maximum units allowed for
the development. The area that could be used for net area would be determined if a
modification of the existing subdivision plat is proposed. However, it would be unlikely to
result in a significant change to the existing subdivision as 123 lots have been platted and
roadway infrastructure has been installed.
The applicant excluded approximately 5 acres of the I-2 zoning designation on the subject
property from this request in order to limit potential impacts and additional regulations on
the adjacent remaining industrial land, as under current county zoning regulations, industrial
uses next to residential land are subject to additional structure setbacks.
The areas where the proposed residential zoning abuts industrial land generally consist of
environmental constraints similar to the subject site, making any potential industrial
development more likely to be closer to Castle Hayne Road and to exceed any required
setback from the new R-15 district.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 5 of 12
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
TRANSPORTATION
Access is provided to the subject property via the Preservation Point Subdivision that
connects to Castle Hayne Road (NC 133). In addition, there is a point of egress using
Brentwood Drive (SR 1313) which connects to Castle Hayne Road approximately 900 feet
to the north of the entrance to the subdivision.
Primary and
Secondary Access
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 6 of 12
As no additional lots are being created or added to the subdivision, the estimated number
of peak hour trips anticipated with the proposed request is below the 100 peak hour trip
threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). In
addition, the request is not expected to generate any additional trips outside of those
generated by the Preservation Point residents and guests.
Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts, Staff has provided the
volume to capacity ratio for Castle Hayne Road near the subject site. While volume to
capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of
adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is
generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a
roadway. However, the available volume to capacity date indicates capacity currently
exists in this area.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2019
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
Castle Hayne Road 1600 Block (south of
Brentwood Drive) 13,000 16,700 0.78
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the Preservation Point Subdivision was approved by
NCDOT and the WMPO in August 2019. Per the approved TIA, Phase 1 will consist of 123
single-family detached residential dwellings (including the existing 98 lots approved in
2017) and 27 multi-family attached residential dwellings. The full build of the site (2023)
will consist of the above mentioned residential dwellings, a 5,000 square foot day care
center, a 3,000 square foot high-turnover sit-down restaurant, a 2,000 square foot
coffee/donut shop with drive-thru uses, and a small office building for 20 employees.
The TIA required the developer to install roadway improvements including a driveway at
the entrance of the subdivision with one lane for ingress and left- and right-turn lanes for
egress. The developer is currently in the process of constructing these improvements, which
must be installed prior to the development being completed. Prior to the commercial uses
being developed, a right-turn lane at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and Division
Drive will be required.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 7 of 12
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
STIP Project U-5863
o Project to widen Castle Hayne Road from I-140 to Division Drive.
o Right-of-Way acquisition for the project is scheduled for 2025, however,
construction is currently on hold.
STIP Project U-5954
o Project to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and 23rd
Street.
o Right-of-Way acquisition for the project is scheduled for 2025, with construction to
begin in 2027.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 8 of 12
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by
the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. Preservation Point
(Subject Site)
Phase 1
123 single-family dwellings
27 multi-family dwellings
Approved August 21, 2019
Phase 1 – 2022 Build Out
Year
2023 Full Build Out Year
Full Build
123 single-family dwellings
27 multi-family dwellings
5,000 sf of day care
3,000 sf of high-turnover sit-
down restaurant
2,000 sf of coffee/donut
shop with drive-thru
Small office building with 20
employees
The TIA required improvements must be completed at certain intersections in the area. The
notable improvements consisted of:
Phase 1: Construct a driveway at the entrance of the subject site and Castle Hayne Road
that has one ingress and two egress lanes, with one continuous eastbound left turn lane,
and construct a right turn lane to exit the site. Install a stop control at the entrance of the
subject site and Castle Hayne Road.
Full Build: Construct a right turn lane at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and Division
Drive.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
None
Development Status: The developer is currently in the process of constructing the Phase 1
required roadway improvements. A total of 123 lots have been platted, and site work is
currently underway.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Hanover Lakes 231 single-family
dwellings
Approved August 13, 2015
2018 Build Out Year (per
NCDOT, an update to the TIA
is not required).
The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
Installation of a northbound left turn lane, southbound left turn lane, and southbound right
turn lane on Castle Hayne Road at the subdivision’s entrance.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
None
Development Status: The subdivision is under construction with 188 lots platted. The
required roadway improvements have been installed.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 8
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 9 of 12
ENVIRONMENTAL
The entire subject property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, specifically the
AE flood zone (100-year floodplain).
The property contains regulated wetlands which will be preserved in conservation space.
The vast majority of the subject property contains brackish marsh, which is subject to the
standards of the conservation resources.
The property is located within the Northeast Cape Fear River Floodplain, a Natural
Heritage Area. This Natural Heritage Area is classified as exceptional, meaning it may
contain at minimum 10 rare plant and animal species.
The property is within the Smith Creek (C; Sw) watershed.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class IV (unsuitable). However, Preservation Point will be served by
public water and sewer.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
CONTEXT AND COMPATABILITY
The property is located along “Old” Castle Hayne Road, a local road that has direct access
to Castle Hayne Road, which is identified as Minor Arterial road on the WMPO Functional
Classification Map.
The subject property has been placed into a conservation easement to preserve the
wetlands and riparian resources and to prohibit development within its boundaries. In
addition, the area is required to be maintained in its natural, scenic, and open condition
further aligning the site with the Comprehensive Plans goal for the Conservation place type.
Due to the environmental features that exist on the site, additional restrictions apply that
place protections for the site’s natural environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats and
prohibit any development of the site.
This rezoning request is not expected to increase the number of trips generated along the
adjacent roadways because no additional lots are proposed to be created.
Approximately 71 acres of I-2, Heavy Industrial zoned land is being removed from New
Hanover County’s zoning districts.
This expansion of land area within the Preservation Point Subdivision will have no impact on
the school system as no additional lots will be created nor will development take place in
the area per the conservation easement restrictions.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 9
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 10 of 12
Driveway to Preservation Point Entrance to Preservation Point
Adjacent Castle Hayne Road (Castle Hayne Road to Rear)
Preservation Point Avenue Riverview Terrace Looking
Looking Southwest to Subject Site South to Subject Site
Preservation Point Amenity Center
on Egret Crossing Way
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 10
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 11 of 12
Boardwalk Connecting Preservation Point
to San Souci Amenity Island
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Conservation
Place Type
Description
Covers areas of natural open space and is intended to protect the natural
environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats that serve the public
through environmental education, low-impact recreation, and in their natural
beauty. In areas where zoning allows other uses, such as single family
residential, increased density would be discouraged, and low impact
development methods would be required. Such requirements place limits
on development to ensure the protection of resources.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 11
Z20-22 Staff Report PB 12.3.2020 Page 12 of 12
Analysis
The intent of the Conservation place type is to highlight areas where
development and land uses may need to be limited in order to protect
natural resources. The majority of the area included in the rezoning request
is identified as a Potential Significant Natural Heritage Area in the
Comprehensive Plan. These areas are designated by the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) based on features such as the presence
of rare species, exemplary natural communities, or important animal
assemblages, such as the exceptional coastal wetlands on the subject site.
Many of the types of industrial uses allowed in the I-2, Heavy Industrial
district are not in line with the Comprehensive Plan’s intent to protect the
resources on the subject site. While an R-15 zoning designation could
generally allow the type of increased density discouraged by the plan, the
conservation easement associated with the site would not allow additional
residential units to be built in this area and would protect the site’s natural
environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed R-15 rezoning, in conjunction with the conservation easement
on file for the subject property, is generally CONSISTENT with the goals of
the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it is a more appropriate designation
than the existing I-2, Heavy Industrial zoning, would not allow additional
residential units to be built in this area, and would protect the site’s natural
environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a
more appropriate designation than the existing I-2 zoning, and with the conservation
easement on record for the property, additional protections are provided for the site’s
natural environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats which restrict development on
the subject site. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the
public interest because the request removes an industrial zoning designation from land
that is environmentally sensitive and offers increased protection to the adjacent
residential property and wetlands. In addition, the boundary of the proposed rezoning
was designed to limit additional regulations on the adjacent remaining industrial
property.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to an R-15 district. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is a
more appropriate designation than the existing I-2 zoning, and with the conservation
easement on record for the property, additional protections are provided for the site’s
natural environment, water quality, and wildlife habitats which restrict development on
the subject site, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because the proposal is not consistent with the surrounding community and the
use will adversely impact the adjacent properties.
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 12
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 6
EXHIBIT
MAP
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1
HANAPER
HANA
P
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
(
±
)
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWLNHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWL
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWL
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHWLNHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NH
W
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
NHW
L
S
M
I
T
H
C
R
E
E
K
OV
E
R
H
E
A
D
H
I
G
H
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
P
O
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
EXRO
W
M
O
N
EXRO
W
M
O
N
EI
PEI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
10
'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
B
4
0
P
G
3
2
5
PV
C
ST
U
B
PV
C
ST
U
B
PM
PV
C
ST
U
B
PV
C
ST
U
B
PM
S
4
8
°
4
0
'
4
1
"
E
2
6
5
.
4
3
'
OV
E
R
H
E
A
D
H
I
G
H
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
P
O
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
EXRO
W
MO
N
EXRO
W
M
O
N
EI
PEI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
EI
P
10
'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
B
4
0
P
G
3
2
5
-E
Y
1
-
S
0
1
°
2
1
'
5
7
.
2
"
W
-
E
Y
1
-
U5
8
6
3
-
2
S 89°19'
3
1
"
E
126.41'
N 89°1
0
'
0
4
"
W
118.73
'
EI
P
R/
W
MO
N
R/
W
MO
N
R/
W
MO
N
N
0
0
°
3
7
'
0
7
"
E
15
4
.
7
1
'
N
2
0
°
1
2
'
0
2
"
W
52
.
4
9
'
S
2
2
°
3
9
'
5
7
"
W
21
5
.
4
9
'
11051616guy
11061597guy11071690guy
11081515guy11091540guy11101574guy
11111667guy
11121626guy
11131700guy
11141816str
11151701str11161717str
11171660str
FLOOD Z
O
N
E
A
E
FLO
O
D
Z
O
N
E
A
E
FLO
O
D
Z
O
N
E
A
E
AE
F
L
O
O
D
L
I
N
E
AE
F
L
O
O
D
L
I
N
E
WE
T
L
A
N
D
B
O
R
D
E
R
WE
T
L
A
N
D
B
O
R
D
E
R
WETLAN
D
B
O
R
D
E
R
B
R
E
N
T
W
O
O
D
D
R
I
V
E
6
0
'
R
/
W
PA
L
M
E
T
T
O
R
O
A
D
G
L
E
N
D
A
L
E
D
R
I
V
E
HERO
N
'
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
OSP
R
E
Y
C
O
V
E
C
O
U
R
T
RIV
E
R
V
I
E
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
TI
D
A
L
L
A
N
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
W
A
Y
H
O
L
L
Y
B
E
R
R
Y
C
O
U
R
T
5
0
'
R
/
W
RIV
E
R
V
I
E
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
5
0
'
R
/
W
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
EG
R
E
T
5
0
'
R
/
W
S
4
8
°
4
0
'
4
1
"
E
26
5
.
4
3
'
7
0
'
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
1
0
0
'
R
/
W
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
20'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
DRAIN
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
DRA
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
70
'
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
20' DRAINA
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
40' UTIILI
T
Y
EASEME
N
T
20' D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
70
'
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
40
'
U
T
I
I
L
I
T
Y
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
20
'
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
HERO
N
'
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
E
50' R
/
W
FFE=23.35
WSE=22.70
FFE=23.35 B
R
E
N
T
W
O
O
D
D
R
I
V
E
6
0
'
R
/
W
PA
L
M
E
T
T
O
R
O
A
D
G
L
E
N
D
A
L
E
D
R
I
V
E
HERO
N
'
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
OSP
R
E
Y
C
O
V
E
C
O
U
R
T
RIV
E
R
V
I
E
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
TI
D
A
L
L
A
N
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
W
A
Y
H
O
L
L
Y
B
E
R
R
Y
C
O
U
R
T
5
0
'
R
/
W
RIV
E
R
V
I
E
W
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
PR
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
P
O
I
N
T
A
V
E
N
U
E
5
0
'
R
/
W
5
0
'
R
/
W
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
EG
R
E
T
5
0
'
R
/
W
HERO
N
'
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
E
50' R
/
W
HA
N
A
P
E
R
X17
MIN. RAM
P
=
1
:
1
2
LANDING
RAMP =
1
:
1
2
RAMP = 1:12
LANDING
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
D
R
.
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
1
0
0
'
R
/
W
70
'
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
70
'
D
U
K
E
E
N
E
R
G
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PROJECT:
SCALE:
RELEASE:
APPROVED:
CHECKED:
DESIGNED:
IN
I
T
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
www.cldeng.com
Coastal Land Design, PLLC
www.cldeng.com
Phone: 910-254-9333
Fax: 910-254-0502
P.O.Box 1172
Wilmington, NC 28402
Civil Engineering / Landscape Architecture
Land Planning / Construction Management
NCBELS Firm License P-0369
SHEET
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G
"P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
P
O
I
N
T
"
Ne
w
H
a
n
o
v
e
r
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
N
C
-
1" = 200'
989-01
JFB
JFB
JFB
RZ-1
AMENITY
AREA
RECREATION
ISLAND
COD LINE
REAR SETBACK
AT COD LINE
COASTAL WETLAND LINE
COASTAL WETLANDS
WETLANDS
EXISTING R-15 ZONING
EXISTING R-15 CUD ZONING
PROPOSED R-15 ZONING
EXISTING B-2 ZONING
EXISTING I-2 ZONING
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 200'
200'100'0200'400'
NORTH
ZONED
COMMERCIAL
(B-2)
EXISTING ZONING:I-2
PROPOSED ZONING:R-15
(71.36 ACRES)
PARCEL #1
PIN# R4100-001-002-000PARCEL #2
PIN# R4100-001-150-000
EXISTING R-15 CUD
EXISTING R-15
EXISTING B-2
EXISTING I-2
PRESERVATION POINT
SAN SOUCI ISLAND
Developer:
Preservation Point
Partners, LLC
9827 Cogdill Rd, STE 1
Knoxville, TN 37932
PLAN PREPARATION
DATE: 11/2/2020
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2020
Other Business
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Interim Director; Marty Li le, Long Range Planner; Dylan
McDonnell, Long Range Planner
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth, Marty Li le, Dylan McDonnell
SUBJECT:
Long Range Planning Update
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Staff will provide an update on transporta$on plans and projects impac$ng the unincorporated areas of New Hanover
County and the results of the 2019-2020 Water Quality Monitoring Program.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hear presenta$on
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 3
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2020
Other Business
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Interim Director; Jennifer Rigby, Chief Strategy Officer
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth, Jennifer Rigby
SUBJECT:
Complete Communi*es Strategic Goal Presenta*on
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The 2018-2023 New Hanover County Strategic Plan adopted by the Board of Commissioners includes a goal to
encourage the development of complete communi-es in the unincorporated county. Complete communi-es provide
a range of housing sizes and price points, employment opportuni-es, convenience needs, community facili-es, and
support services to provide access and opportunity for all New Hanover County ci-zens.
Planning and Strategy staff have iden-fied specific measures to track our progress in increasing housing diversity and
access to basic goods and services, and now that these measures are being reported out, an analysis of the impact of
proposed rezonings on this strategic goal will be included in staff reports when relevant.
During this presenta-on, Jennifer Rigby will provide an overview of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan and the
purpose of the complete communi-es goal. Rebekah Roth will present informa-on on the components of a complete
community, how they are being measured, and what the staff report analysis will include.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth & Economic DevelopmentEncourage development of complete communi-es in the unincorporated
countyCi-zens have daily needs met by NHC businesses and support themEnsure NHC has appropriate housing to
support business growthIncrease connec-vity of residents to each other and their investment to New Hanover
County
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Hear presenta-on.
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 4
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2020
Other Business
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Chair, Donna Girardot
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth, Interim Director of Planning and Land Use
SUBJECT:
Approval of 2021 Mee)ng Calendar
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Considera on of the Planning Board's 2021 mee ng calendar.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 5
DRAFT
Tuesday, January 5 3:00 PM Thursday, January 7 6:00 PM
Tuesday, February 2 3:00 PM Thursday, February 4 6:00 PM
Tuesday, March 1 3:00 PM Thursday, March 4 6:00 PM
Tuesday, March 30 3:00 PM Thursday, April 1 6:00 PM
Tuesday, May 4 3:00 PM Thursday, May 6 6:00 PM
Tuesday, June 1 3:00 PM Thursday, June 3 6:00 PM
Tuesday, July 6 3:00 PM Thursday, July 8 **6:00 PM
Tuesday, August 3 3:00 PM Thursday, August 5 6:00 PM
Tuesday, August 31 3:00 PM Thursday, September 2 6:00 PM
Tuesday, October 5 3:00 PM Thursday, October 7 6:00 PM
Tuesday, November 2 3:00 PM Thursday, November 4 6:00 PM
Tuesday, November 30 3:00 PM Thursday, December 2 6:00 PM
Tuesday, January 4 2022 3:00 PM Thursday, January 6 2022 6:00 PM
** 2nd Thursday
Location: NHC Government Center
Planning & Land Use Conference Room
Location: NHC Historic Courthouse, Assembly Room
301, 24 North 3rd Street
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARDNEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
2021 Agenda Review and Regular Meeting Schedule
AGENDA REVIEW
MEETING DATE MEETING TIME REGULAR MEETING DATE MEETING TIME
DRAFTPlanning Board - December 3, 2020
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1