HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 1 of 16
STAFF SUMMARY OF Z21-03
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z21-03
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional RMF-M district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Stephanie Norris with Terroir Development, LLC Charles R. Clay, Sr. and Essie W. Clay
Revocable Living Trust
Location: Acreage:
4615 Gordon Road 5.12
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R04300-001-007-000 General Residential
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped Multi-Family
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15, Residential (CZD) RMF-M
ADA = Additional Dwelling Allowance Special Use Permit (SUP) for greater density than permitted by-right in
base zoning district – formerly titled High Density SUP
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Multi-Family Residential R-15
East Single-Family Residential R-15
South Single-Family Residential, Gas Station R-15, (CUD) B-1
West Storage, I-40 (CUD) B-1
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 2 of 16
ZONING HISTORY
July 7, 1972 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 8B)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA via mainline
extension
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Murrayville Station
Schools Murrayville Elementary, Trask Middle, and Laney High Schools
Recreation Smith Creek Park, Parkwood Recreation Area, Ogden Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
The Conservation Resources Map indicates that swamp forest wetlands may
be present on the site. The applicant’s conceptual site plan indicates that
there are approximately 0.8 acres of wetlands on the site. Verification of
regulated wetlands will be required during the site plan review process.
Conservation space is required for pocosin or swamp forest wetlands when
at least five acres of the resource exists on the property.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 3 of 16
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to construct an 84-unit multi-family project. The units will be
located within three buildings containing 24-36 units each. The buildings will be three stories
with a maximum height of 45 feet.
• The applicant is seeking Low-Income Housing Tax Credits through the North Carolina Housing
Finance Agency which would restrict the residents’ incomes to under 80% area median
income (AMI). In addition, 21 of the proposed units will be restricted to residents whose
incomes are 30% or below AMI.
• The proposal would include about 1.7 acres of open space (34% of the site), which exceeds
the County’s requirement of providing 20% open space.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The R-15 district in this area was established in 1972. At the time, the purpose of the R-15
district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and well would be developed
at low densities. Since that time, water and sewer services have become available to the
surrounding area; however, the Gordon Road corridor is mostly zoned for low density
housing.
• While the R-15 district is the predominant zoning in the surrounding area, two nearby
developments obtained special use permits to exceed the maximum density of the base
zoning district of 2.5 du/ac (Hawthorne at Smith Creek Apts - 7.72 du/ac, and The Landing
at Lewis Creek Estates – 5.15 du/ac).
• Under the County’s performance residential standards, the site would be permitted up to
13 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du/ac. The proposed 84 units equate to an overall
density of 16.4 du/ac.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 4 of 16
• In 2018, the Board of Commissioners approved a Special Use Permit application that would
have allowed for the development of an indoor/outdoor recreation center on the subject
site. That permit has since expired.
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 5 of 16
TRANSPORTATION
• Access is proposed to be provided to the subject property from Gordon Road, an NCDOT-
maintained arterial street. The access is shared with the adjacent gas station and storage
lot within an existing 60’ access easement.
• The applicant has agreed to a condition that would require striping be installed along the
shared access easement to delineate two lanes of travel. In addition, no parking shall be
permitted within the easement and “no parking” signs shall be installed in accordance with
the North Carolina Fire Code. The improvements shown below reflect the feedback received
by the Planning Board when they considered this item at their March 4th meeting.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 6 of 16
• The shared access does not permit left-out movements which requires motorists leaving the
site seeking to travel east on Gordon Road to initially go west and then make a u-turn at
the N. College Road intersection. This u-turn lane was recently extended with The Landing
at Lewis Creek Estates development. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
completed for that development, the N. College Road and Gordon Road intersection was
estimated to operate at a “D” Level of Service (LOS) in 2021 when that project is expected
to be completed. The improvements installed with The Landing at Lewis Creek Estates are
estimated to have reduced the overall delay of the intersection.
• The applicant has also designed the site to allow for a future connection to Rosebay Terrace,
a private road that accesses the neighboring Hawthorne at Smith Creek apartment complex.
A connection to this road would allow motorists to travel to the signal on Gordon Road at
Blount Drive, and for the neighboring residents to travel to the Buy Quick gas station without
having to travel on Gordon. According to the applicant, the most recent correspondence
from the owners of the Hawthorne projected has indicated that they have refused the
connection request.
• As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 14 trips during the peak
hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed development would increase
the estimated number of peak hour trips by about 15-25 trips during the peak hours.
However, according to the applicant, residents who are earning 30% or less than average
median income (AMI) are typically seniors or persons with disabilities who either generally
drive outside of the peak hours or rely on other modes of transportation.
• The estimated trip generation for the proposal is less than the recreation center approved
for the site in 2018. That center was estimated to have generated around 50-60 trips
during the peak hours.
• The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that
triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
• Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts, Staff has provided the
volume to capacity ratio for the adjacent roadways near the subject site. While volume to
capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of
adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is
generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a
roadway.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2019
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
Gordon Road 4400 Block 22,500 19,600 1.15
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM
Typical Development
under Current Zoning:
13 Single-Family
Dwellings 14 AM / 14 PM
Proposed
Development:
84 Mid-Rise Multi-
Family Units 29 AM / 37 PM
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 7 of 16
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
• STIP Project U-6202
o Project to widen Gordon Road from the I-40 ramps to Market Street. The widening
of Gordon Road will result in the road having four lanes and a center median. The
project is currently scheduled to begin construction in the summer of 2024.
• U-5792 (College/MLK Interchange) & U-5881 (College Road Improvements)
o Project to upgrade College Road from Gordon Road to New Centre Drive. NCDOT’s
recommended plans for these projects include converting certain intersections along
College Road into interchanges, including at MLK Parkway and Kings Drive.
o The College/MLK Interchange project is currently scheduled to begin in 2026, and the
College Road Improvements projects is scheduled to begin after 2030.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 8 of 16
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed
by the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. The Landing at
Lewis Creek
• 207 single-family dwellings
• 40 townhome units
• 192 multi-family units
• TIA approved September 6,
2017
• 2021 Build Out Year
The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• Extension of the northbound turn lane on Gordon Road and North College Road/I-40
westbound ramps.
• Extension of the existing westbound left-turn lane and extend the existing southbound
left turn lane on Gordon road and North College Road/I-40 eastbound Ramps.
• Signalization of the intersection of Gordon and Blount Drive (site access). Installation of
a westbound-left turn lane on Gordon Road and eastbound right-turn lane on Gordon
Road at the site access.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• Gordon Road Buy Quick
Development Status: 190 lots have been platted at this time. Currently all roadway
improvements have been completed.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Smith Creek Village
Development
• 318 multi-family units
• TIA approved February 7,
2019
• 2020 Build Out Year
The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• At site access construction of a right-in/right-out only access and stop control for egress
traffic.
• Installation of a westbound right-turn lane and southbound left-turn lane at Gordon
Road and Blount Drive.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• The Landing at Lewis Creek Estates Subdivision
Development Status: Completed. All roadway improvements have been completed.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 9 of 16
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property contains an AE Special Flood Hazard Area along the northern boundary;
however, no buildings are proposed within it.
• The property does not contain any Natural Heritage Areas.
• The property is within the Smith Creek (C;Sw) watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class II (moderate limitation), Class III (severe limitation), and Class IV
(unsuitable) soils. However, the site is expected to be served by CFPUA when developed.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
SCHOOLS
• Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Murrayville Elementary
School, Trask Middle School, and Laney High School. Students may apply to attend public
magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
• A maximum of 13 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base
density, and 84 units could be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 71
dwelling units.
• Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in
homes would result in approximately 18 additional students than would be generated under
current zoning. However, affordable housing developments may be more likely to provide
housing for families with school-age children, so the proposed rezoning may generate more
students than would be estimated using the historic generation rate.
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation
(generalized historic student generation rate)*
Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high
Typical Development
under Current R-15 Zoning 13 residential units Total: 2
(1 elementary, 0 middle, 1 high)
Proposed (CZD) RMF-M
Zoning 84 residential units Total: 20
(9 elementary, 4 middle, 6 high)
* Generalized historic generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school
student enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. Currently,
there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high)
generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students
attending out-of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTECH. Generation
rates do not take into account different housing types and different locations, which typically yield different numbers
of students.
• Since the proposed development is likely to have a build-out date within 5 years, staff has
outlined existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public
schools.
• These numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades that may occur over the next
five years or changes to student populations.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 10 of 16
School Enrollment* and Capacity** - 2020-2021 Estimates
* Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools enrollment that was projected for the 2020-2021 school
year.
** Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020-2021 school year and are
based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements
unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children’s classrooms beyond the original building design,
classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL, or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn’t
specifically designed with those spaces.
• The recent facility needs survey that has been prepared by Schools staff includes the most
current NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school
capacity data. It does not include student growth projections and available capacity for
individual schools, but it appears that planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to
student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district-wide over the next five
years if facility upgrades are funded.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY STRATEGIC PLAN
• One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage
the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing
housing diversity and access to basic goods and services.
• The proposed RMF-M zoning district would allow for an increase in housing diversity and
would allow those residents to utilize existing goods and services within one mile of the
subject property.
• The predominant housing type is single family detached at 76%. Under the proposed RMF-
M district the site would allow for multi-family (apartments) and increase housing type
diversity by reducing the percentage of single family detached (76% to 74%), and
increasing the percentage of multi-family residences (21% to 22%).
• In addition to increasing the housing type diversity of the community, the proposal would
also provide housing at more affordable price points for residents earning less than 80%
area median income (AMI). Income-restricted affordable housing, like the proposed LIHTC
project, that are located in complete communities can create a more equitable, integrated
and diverse community. Based on the findings of the Comprehensive Housing Study
completed by the joint New Hanover County/City of Wilmington Workforce Housing
Advisory Committee, there is a need for rental units serving the population at these income
levels across the County.
• The subject property is located in the Gordon Road community area, where 30% of
residents currently live within one-mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples,
Level
Total
NHC %
Capacity
School
Enrollment
of Assigned
School
Capacity
of
Assigned
School w/
Portables
% of
Capacity of
Assigned
School
Funded
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 97% Murrayville 526 643 82% None
Middle 107% Trask 717 662 108% None
High 105% Laney 2,063 1,903 108% None
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 11 of 16
pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor’s office, child & adult care,
etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.). The proposed RMF-M
district would increase the number of residences within one-mile of goods and services (30%
to 31%).
REPRESENTATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
Representative Developments of R-15:
Grayson Park Clay Crossing
Plantation Landing
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 12 of 16
Representative Developments of RMF-M:
Amberleigh Shores Parks at Three Oaks
Hawthorne at Smith Creek
Context and Compatibility
• The property is located adjacent the Gordon Road/I-40 interchange and shares access
with an existing gas station and storage lot.
• The timing of the Gordon Road widening project has been accelerated and is now
scheduled to begin in 2024.
• Two nearby residential developments have obtained a Special Use Permit to exceed the
maximum density of the base residential zoning district. These projects include multi-family
housing that is similar in design to the proposed project (40 to 45-foot-tall three-story
buildings).
• Due to the location and surrounding development pattern, the property is less likely to be
developed with low density housing. The last development proposal for the site was for a
recreation facility, for which a Special Use Permit was approved in 2018.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 13 of 16
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type General Residential
Place Type
Description
Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic and commercial
services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses
should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while
recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses
include single-family residential, low-density multi-family residential, light
commercial, civic, and recreational.
Analysis
The subject parcel is located along Gordon Road just east of the I-40 and
Gordon Road interchange. The site is adjacent to a Buy Quick gas station,
an outdoor boat storage facility, and the Hawthorne at Smith Creek
apartments. The proposed development will share access to Gordon Road
with the Buy Quick gas station and the outdoor boat storage facility.
This area was designated as General Residential due to the primarily lower
density residential development pattern along the Gordon Road corridor
toward Market Street. Although non-residential and multi-family projects
were approved and permitted in this area prior to the adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan in 2016, these types of low intensity commercial and
low-density multi-family uses could be appropriate in a variety of place
types, including General Residential.
As proposed, the density of this multi-family project is not consistent with the
General Residential place type because it exceeds the density range of up
to eight units per acre outlined for General Residential areas. However, the
proposed project assists in meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of
providing affordable housing for residents with fewer existing housing
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 14 of 16
options and of establishing higher densities along major roadways that
provide a transition of densities and intensities. In this case, the project is
located adjacent to an existing commercial development which allows direct
access to a major arterial roadway and creates an orderly transition by
placing higher density multi-family between the high intensity Interstate
corridor where low density single-family housing is less likely to be
developed and the existing low intensity residential uses along Gordon
Road
The General Residential place type may no longer be an appropriate
designation in this area because the existing commercial and multi-family
projects and close proximity to a major roadway suggest the need for
higher densities. Generally, the Comprehensive Plan designates areas along
major roadways with higher residential densities and a mix of uses as
Community Mixed Use in order to allow for the orderly transition of densities
and intensities. This place type also focuses on small-scale, compact mixed-
use development patterns. This type of development pattern would assist
with providing opportunities for affordability and a range of housing types,
opportunities, and choices.
In situations when the Board of Commissioners approve a request that is
found to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, state statutes require
a statement approving the request and that the plan be amended
concurrently to reflect the specific place type that is most similar to the
proposed development. The statement must also include an explanation of
the change in conditions in the area that were taken into account in the
decision.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed development is INCONSISTENT with the General Residential
place type because the proposed density is greater than the maximum
density recommended for this place type.
However, staff is supportive of the proposed development as it is aligned
with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for providing affordable housing
and creating complete communities. It is also aligned with the
Comprehensive Plan’s intent of providing an orderly transition of uses from
higher intensity to lower intensity areas and providing for a range of
housing types. The proposed moderate density multi-family housing is also
consistent with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area.
As state law dictates, if the rezoning were to be approved even though
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Plan must be concurrently
amended to reflect the specific place type that is most similar to the
proposed development.
Therefore, it is staff’s recommendation to amend the place type for the
subject site to Community Mixed Use because the proposal is in line with the
recommended density of the place type. This place type is also more
appropriate for the area because single-family homes are less likely to be
built immediately adjacent to major thoroughfares, and because it would
encourage the development of projects that would provide a buffer and
serve as a transition to the existing single-family residences along Gordon
Road.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 15 of 16
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board considered this application at their March 4th meeting. At the meeting, no one
from the public spoke in opposition, or in favor of, the proposal. The Planning Board recommended
approval of the application with conditions (5-0). While they found it to be:
INCONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
project exceeds the density recommended for the General Residential place type, the
Planning Board found APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the
public interest because the proposal would provide an appropriate transition from a
major thoroughfare to existing single-family housing, is consistent with the development
pattern of the surrounding properties, and supports the County’s goals of providing for
a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income
levels.
Conditions:
1. The development must be awarded Low-Income Housing Tax Credits through the North
Carolina Housing Finance Agency.
2. Appropriate pavement markings shall be installed along the 60-foot access easement
from Gordon Road to the subject site to identify two lanes of travel. In addition, no
parking shall be permitted within the easement and “no parking” signs shall be installed
in accordance with the North Carolina Fire Code.
In addition, the Planning Board recommended that the place type classification for the property be
amended to Community Mixed Use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the Planning Board’s recommendation for approval of the proposal and the
reclassification of the subject site from General Residential to Community Mixed Use on the
2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. Staff suggests the following motion:
I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-M district. While I
find it to be INCONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan
because the project exceeds the density recommended for the General Residential
place type, I find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because the proposal would provide an appropriate transition from a major
thoroughfare to existing single-family housing, is consistent with the development
pattern of the surrounding properties, and supports the County’s goals of providing for
a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income
levels.
In accordance with the North Carolina General Statutes, I move to reclassify the
property from the General Residential place type to the Community Mixed Use place
type. I find the proposal is consistent with the recommended building types and
densities of the Community Mixed Use classification. In addition, the Community Mixed
Use classification would encourage the development of projects that would better serve
as a transition between a major thoroughfare and single-family housing.
Z21-03 Staff Report BOC 4.5.2021 Page 16 of 16
[Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district:
1. The development must be awarded Low-Income Housing Tax Credits through the North
Carolina Housing Finance Agency.
2. Appropriate pavement markings shall be installed along the 60-foot access easement from
Gordon Road to the subject site to identify two lanes of travel. In addition, no parking shall
be permitted within the easement and “no parking” signs shall be installed in accordance
with the North Carolina Fire Code.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-M district. I find it to be
INCONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
proposal exceeds the density recommended for the General Residential place type. I
also find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding
community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods.