HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-01 PB AGENDA PACKET NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC 28401
Members of the Board
Donna Girardot, Chair | Jeffrey B. Petroff, Vice-Chair
Colin J. Tarrant | Hansen Matthews | Clark Hipp | Walter “Pete” Avery | Kevin Hine
Rebekah Roth, Director| Ken Vafier, Planning Manager
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
JANUARY 5, 2023, 5:00 PM
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of Minutes
Consideration of Amended 2023 Meeting Calendar
REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The Planning Board may consider substantial changes in these petitions as a result of objections, debate, and
discussion at the meeting, including rezoning to other classifications.
1 Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z22-23) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf of
6844 Bayat Land, LLC, property owner, to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 3.83 acres of land
located at 6830 and 6844 Carolina Beach Road from R-15, Residential to 2.00 acres of (CZD) B-1,
Conditional Neighborhood Business for a convenience store and 1.83 acres to (CZD) R-5, Conditional
Moderate-High Density Residential for 12 single-family attached dwellings.
2 Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z22-25) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf
of Willie Moore, Jr. and Joyce Ruffin, property owners, to rezone two parcels totaling
approximately 4.65 acres of land located at 2700 and 2707 Old Wrightsboro Road from AR,
Airport Residential, to (CZD) AC, Conditional Airport Commerce for an office and warehouses.
3 Public Hearing
Rezoning Request (Z22-26) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf of
Paul and Jane Chaucer, property owners, to rezone one parcel totaling 0.362 acres of land located at
2626 Castle Hayne Road from R-20, Residential to CZD CB, Community Business to convert an existing
single-family home for retail and office use.
4 Preliminary Forum
Special Use Permit Request (S22-03) - Request by Thomas Johnson with Skyway Towers,
applicant, on behalf of Kenneth and Eloise Parker, property owners, for a Special Use Permit for a
Wireless Support Structure to be located on an approximately 4.28-acre parcel east of the
intersection of Plantation Road and Military Cutoff Extension which is currently zoned R-15, Residential
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/5/2023
Approval of Minutes
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth
SUBJECT:
Consideraon of Amended 2023 Meeng Calendar
BRIEF SUMMARY:
Due to a large number of applica ons over the past two months, the Planning Board elected to modify the mee ng me for their December 2022 and
January 2023 regular mee ngs from 6:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
Upon the request of the Chair, staff has explored the possibility of permanently moving the mee ng to 5 PM and determined that this is possible from a
staffing standpoint. If the Board decides that moving the mee ng me is desired, an amended mee ng calendar for 2023 will need to be adopted.
The mee ng calendar a2ached for the Board's considera on amends the me of the 2023 Planning Board mee ngs to a 5 PM start. It also changes the
mee ng loca on for the Board's agenda review mee ngs, removing the specified conference room loca on. Once the new Government Center is
opened, a specific mee ng room will be determined.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Consider adop ng the amended 2023 Planning Board Mee ng calendar.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip on
Amended 2023 Planning Board Meeting Calendar
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Tuesday, January 3, 2023 3:00 PM Thursday, January 5, 2023 5:00 PM
Tuesday, January 31 3:00 PM Thursday, February 2 5:00 PM
Tuesday, February 28 3:00 PM Thursday, March 2 5:00 PM
Tuesday, March 28 3:00 PM Thursday, March 30*5:00 PM
Tuesday, May 2 3:00 PM Thursday, May 4 5:00 PM
Tuesday, May 30 3:00 PM Thursday, June 1 5:00 PM
Friday, June 30*3:00 PM Thursday, July 6 5:00 PM
Tuesday, August 1 3:00 PM Thursday, August 3 5:00 PM
Friday, September 1*3:00 PM Thursday, September 7 5:00 PM
Tuesday, October 3 3:00 PM Thursday, October 5 5:00 PM
Tuesday, October 31 3:00 PM Thursday, November 2 5:00 PM
Tuesday, December 5 3:00 PM Thursday, December 7 5:00 PM
Tuesday, January 2, 2024 3:00 PM Thursday, January 4, 2024 5:00 PM
*Please note the change in regular meeting day
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
Location: NHC Government Center Location: NHC Historic Courthouse, Assembly Room
301, 24 North 3rd Street
2023 Agenda Review and Regular Meeting Schedule
AGENDA REVIEW
MEETING DATE MEETING TIME REGULAR MEETING DATE MEETING TIME
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/5/2023
Technical Review Commiee Report
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Zach Dickerson, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Zach Dickerson; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Rezoning Request (Z22-23) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solu6ons, applicant, on behalf of 6844 Bayat
Land, LLC, property owner, to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 3.83 acres of land located at 6830 and
6844 Carolina Beach Road from R-15, Residen6al to 2.00 acres of (CZD) B-1, Condi6onal Neighborhood Business
for a convenience store and 1.83 acres to (CZD) R-5, Condi6onal Moderate-High Density Residen6al for 12 single-
family aCached dwellings.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 3.83 acres from R-15, Residen,al to (CZD) B-1, Condi,onal
Neighborhood Business, and (CZD) R-5, Condi,onal Residen,al Moderate-High Density in order to construct a 6,000
square foot convenience store with a 16-pump fueling sta,on. The proposal also includes the construc,on of 12 single
family-homes (four triplexes) to the rear of the convenience store and fuel sta,on.
The applicant's concept plan includes the proposed convenience store and fueling sta,on, single-family homes along
with a bufferyard along the southern boundary that will consist of an eight-foot high screening fence with a pedestrian
gate and sidewalk connec,on from the terminus of the Southern Exposure roadway to the convenience store. A
landscaping streetyard will be required for the por,on of the site that fronts Carolina Beach Road. There is an exis,ng
billboard on site. The applicant has proposed a condi,on that would require them to cancel the contract and remove
the billboard prior to issuance of a Cer,ficate of Occupancy.
The subject site consists of two parcels, both zoned R-15. The por,on of the site that fronts Carolina Beach Road is
proposed for rezoning to (CZD) B-1, transi,oning to the proposed (CZD) R-5 in the rear.
The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the ,me, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that
housing served by private sep,c and wells would be developed at low densi,es. While public water and sewer has not
reached this area, AQUA has provided a leer of commitment for water and sewer service for this site.
The purpose of the proposed B-1, Neighborhood Business, district is to provide lands that accommodate a range of
small-scale, low-intensity, neighborhood-serving commercial development that provide goods and services to residents
of adjacent neighborhoods. District regula,ons are intended to ensure uses, development intensi,es, and a
development form that is consistent with a pedestrian-friendly walkable and neighborhood scale.
The purpose of the proposed R-5, residen,al moderate-high density district is to provide lands that accommodate
moderate to high-density single-family detached and single-family aached development.
The subject parcels are bounded by Carolina Beach Road to the east and Southern Exposure (perpendicular) to the
south. Access is proposed to to the subject property from Carolina Beach Road, an NCDOT-maintained Urban
Principal Arterial highway. Access will be limited to a right-in/right-out movement on Carolina Beach Road with a 200'
right turn land on southbound Carolina Beach Road, prescribed by the Traffic Impact Analysis.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1
NCDOT has indicated that the access depicted on the site is too close to the one to the south that is used for ingress
and egress to the exis,ng single-family development. Per the applicant, the access cannot be moved farther north due
to the decelera,on lane length required by the Traffic Impact Analysis.
The proposed single-family development in the R-5 places 12 aached dwelling units on 1.83, at a density of 6.5
du/acre. The R-5 district allows a maximum density of 8 du/acre under a performance residen,al development.
The UDO prescribes a Type A: Opaque Buffer between the single-family residen,al uses and commercial development.
It is es,mated that the convenience store and fuel sta,on por,on of the site will generate 506 AM and 430 PM peak
hour trips, while the single-family aached por,on will generate 6 AM and 7 PM peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) was completed for this project but has not been formally approved by the WMPO. Approval is slated for
January 2023.
The TIA requires the following notable roadway improvements:
Intersec,on: Carolina Beach Road at Myrtle Grove Road:
-Extend the northbound U-turn lane from 100 feet of storage to 200 feet of storage.
Intersec,on: Carolina Beach Road at Site Access 1:
-Install a southbound right turn lane on Carolina Beach Road with 200 feet of storage and appropriate decelera,on
and taper.
While final Traffic Impact Analysis approval is not required for considera,on of a project by the Planning Board, the
final site access loca,on has not been determined and therefore could impact the site design.
The Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as Community Mixed Use, which promotes a mix of retail, office, and
residen,al development at moderate densi,es. It also recommends higher-intensity mixed use around areas that
transi,on from lower density housing to higher intensity development.
The proposed rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area
designated as Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of uses recommended by that place type. The
residen,al densi,es are in line with those recommended within this place type, and the project will provide housing and
commercial services to those along the Carolina Beach Road corridor and nearby nearby residents.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends the item be con6nued to the February Planning Board mee6ng in order for the details regarding
site access to be finalized.
If the Board determines at the public hearing that sufficient informa,on is available to support a recommenda,on,
staff would recommend approval with the following mo,on and condi,ons:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1
for the types of uses recommended by that place type, and the residen,al densi,es are in line with those
recommended within this place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and
in the public interest because the project will provide housing and commercial services to those along the Carolina
Beach Road corridor and nearby residents.
Proposed Condi6ons:
1. A private access easement will be dedicated to establish permanent access for the three proper,es to the rear
of the development.
2. The bufferyard along the southern boundary will include an eight-foot-high screening fence with a pedestrian
gate and sidewalk connec,on from the terminus of Southern Exposure roadway to the convenience store.
3. The owner will cancel the contract for the exis,ng billboard on the site. The billboard will be removed prior to
issuance of Cer,ficate of Occupancy.
4. In addi,on to the County's tree reten,on standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as
illustrated on the proposed conceptual site plan unless:
a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installa,on, or cause damage to, any required
infrastructure (i.e. water/sewer lines, stormwater, etc.);
b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or
c. The tree is in an unsafe condi,on that may cause harm to the residents or the general public.
5. Staff may administra,vely approve any required changes to the driveway loca,on required by NCDOT.
6. Exterior ligh,ng, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or shielded so as not to cast
illumina,on in an upward direc,on above an imaginary line extended from the light sources parallel to the
ground. Fixtures shall be numbered such that adequate levels of ligh,ng are maintained, but that light spillage
and glare are not directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or motorists. Light posts shall be no taller
than twenty feet.
Alterna6ve Mo6on for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides
for the types of uses recommended by that place type, and the residen,al densi,es are in line with those
recommended within this place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the
public interest because it is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and will adversely
impact the adjacent neighborhood.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip,on
Z22-23 Planning Board Script
Z22-23 Planning Board Staff Report
Z22-23 Zoning Map
Z22-23 FLUM
Z22-23 Mail Out Map
Initial Application Cover Sheet
Z22-23 Initial Application
Concept Plan Cover Sheet
Z22-23 Community Meeting Information
Z22-23 Concept Plan
Traffic Impact Analysis Cover Sheet
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1
Z22-23 TIA
Public Comments Cover Sheet
Public Comments in Opposition
Supplementary Applicant Materials Cover Sheet
Tree Certification- Arborist
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1
PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT
for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z22-23)
Item 1: Rezoning Request (Z22-23) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf
of 6844 Bayat Land, LLC, property owner, to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 3.83 acres of
land located at 6830 and 6844 Carolina Beach Road from R-15, Residential to 2.00 acres of (CZD) B-1,
Neighborhood Business for a convenience store and 1.83 acres to (CZD) R-5, Residential for 12 single-
family attached dwellings.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes
for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
f. Staff review of any additional conditions
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on
the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw
your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote?
6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood
Business District and (CZD) R-5, Residential Moderate-High Density District. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in
an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of uses recommended
by that place type, and the residential densities are in line with those recommended within this
place type. I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because the project will provide housing and commercial services to
those along the Carolina Beach Road corridor and nearby residents.
Proposed Conditions:
1. A private access easement will be dedicated to establish permanent access for the three
properties to the rear of the development.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1
2. The bufferyard along the southern boundary will include an eight-foot-high screening fence
with a pedestrian gate and sidewalk connection from the terminus of Southern Exposure
roadway to the convenience store.
3. The owner will cancel the contract for the existing billboard on the site. The billboard will
be removed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
4. In addition to the County’s tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and
preserve all trees as illustrated on the proposed conceptual site plan unless:
a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any
required infrastructure (i.e. water/sewer lines, stormwater, etc.);
b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or
c. The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents or the general
public.
5. Staff may administratively approve any required changes to the driveway location
required by NCDOT.
6. Exterior lighting, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or shielded so
as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an imaginary line extended from
the light sources parallel to the ground. Fixtures shall be numbered such that adequate
levels of lighting are maintained, but that light spillage and glare are not directed at
adjacent property, neighboring areas, or motorists. Light posts shall be no taller than
twenty feet.
Example Motion for Denial
I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood
Business District and (CZD) R-5, Residential Moderate-High Density District. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in
an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of uses recommended
by that place type, and the residential densities are in line with those recommended within this
place type, I also find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and
in the public interest because it is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding
community and will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhood.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) B-1
Neighborhood Business & (CZD) R-5, Residential Moderate-High Density District. I find it to be
[Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert
reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in
the public interest because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 2
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 1 of 19
STAFF REPORT FOR Z22-23
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z22-23
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional B-1, Neighborhood Business District, and Conditional R-5, Residential
Moderate-High Density District
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Bayat Land LLC
Location: Acreage:
6830 & 6844 Carolina Beach Rd 3.83
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R08200-001-018-000 & R08200-001-014-
000 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped
Convenience Store with Fuel Station and
Single Family Attached Residences
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15, Residential District
(CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business District &
(CZD) R-5, Residential Moderate-High
Density District
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single Family Residences R-15
East Single Family Residences, Fuel Station to the
Northeast R-15
South Single Family Residences (Tidalwater Plantation) R-15
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 2 of 19
West Single Family Residences R-15
ZONING HISTORY
April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer
Water and sewer services are not available through CFPUA. These
properties can be serviced by a private well and septic system approved
and permitted by the NHC Health Department. AQUA has provided a letter
of commitment for water and wastewater utility service at this location
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire
District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station
Schools Anderson Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, and Ashley High Schools
Recreation Veterans Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No known conservation resources
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 3 of 19
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,000 sq ft convenience store with a 16-pump
fueling station.
• The applicant is also proposing to construct four single-family triplexes to the rear of the
convenience store and fuel station.
• The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes a bufferyard along the southern
boundary that will consist of an eight-foot high screening fence with a pedestrian gate and
sidewalk connection from the terminus of the Southern Exposure roadway to the convenience
store.
• The applicant has proposed a dedicated private access easement for permanent access to
the three residential parcels to the rear of the subject property.
• An under-pavement stormwater system is proposed for this development in order to save
the trees where the stormwater ponds were on the community meeting plan. This proposed
16 Pump Fuel Station
Convenience Store 12 Single-Family
Dwellings (Triplex)
Site Access
Fenced Buffer
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 4 of 19
stormwater management system is under review by County Engineering and will require a
soil analysis.
• The applicant has noted several trees on the site plan. A certified arborist has confirmed
that there are no specimen trees on the site and that several of the trees (noted on site)
have root rot.
• New Hanover County Environmental Health has stated that underground storage tanks must
remain 100’ from any wells surrounding this property. If the existing wells on the site are
properly abandoned, then the setbacks to the underground storage tanks will comply with
this regulation.
• There is an existing billboard on the site. The applicant has proposed a condition that would
require them to cancel the contract and remove the billboard prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15
district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed
at low densities. AQUA has provided a letter of commitment for water and sewer service.
• While the site is zoned R-15, the Carolina Beach Road corridor has seen increased interest
in higher density residential and commercial development. This trend is expected to continue.
• As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed a maximum of 9 dwelling units under
a performance residential development, at a density of 2.5 du/acre.
• The purpose of the proposed B-1 district is to provide lands that accommodate a range of
small-scale, low-intensity, neighborhood-serving commercial development that provide
goods and services to residents of adjacent neighborhoods. District regulations are intended
to ensure uses, development intensities, and a development form that is consistent with a
pedestrian-friendly walkable and neighborhood scale.
• The purpose of the proposed R-5, Residential District is to provide lands that accommodate
moderate to high density single-family detached and single-family attached development.
• The proposed single family development in the R-5 places 12 attached dwelling units on
1.83 acres, at a density of 6.5 du/acre. The R-5 district allows a maximum density of 8
du/acre under a performance residential development.
• The UDO prescribes a Type A: Opaque Buffer between the single-family residential uses
and commercial development.
• NCDOT has indicated that the access depicted on the site is too close to the one to the south
that is used for ingress and egress to the existing single-family development. Per the
applicant, the access cannot be moved farther north due to the deceleration lane length
required by the Traffic Impact Analysis.
• If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and Zoning
Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and
specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved
conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 5 of 19
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 6 of 19
TRANSPORTATION
• Access is proposed to the subject property from Carolina Beach Road, an NCDOT-
maintained Urban Principal Arterial highway.
• Access will be limited to a right-in/right-out movement on Carolina Beach Road with a 200’
right turn lane on southbound Carolina Beach road, prescribed by the Traffic Impact
Analysis.
• As previously referenced, NCDOT has indicated that the access depicted on the site is too
close to the one to the south that is used for ingress and egress to the existing single-family
development. Per the applicant, the access cannot be moved farther north due to the
deceleration lane length required by the Traffic Impact Analysis.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 7 of 19
• As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 6 AM / 8 PM trips during
the peak hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed convenience store and
single-family attached development would increase the estimated number of peak hour
trips by approximately 506 AM / 429 PM trips.
• Before any development can occur on this site, the Technical Review Committee will review
all plans for compliance with applicable land use regulations, including any recommended
roadway improvement required by the TIA.
Traffic Impact Analysis
• New developments that are anticipated to generate more than 100 trips during any peak
hour period are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of their rezoning
application.
• The TIA, which is slated for approval in January 2023, analyzed the development of a
6,000 sq ft convenience store with 16 fuel pumps and 18 single-family attached dwelling
units. The proposed rezoning reduces the number of single-family attached dwelling units to
12.
• The TIA analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) in vehicle delay per second at notable
intersections in the area, summarized below:
o US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road) (signalized);
o US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 2364 (Southern Charm Drive) / Hill Valley
Walk (RCI – unsignalized);
o US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (future right-in/right-out);
• The TIA approval requires the following notable roadway improvements:
o Intersection: Carolina Beach Road at Myrtle Grove Road:
▪ Extend the northbound U-turn lane from 100 feet of storage to 200 feet of
storage.
o Carolina Beach Road at Hill Valley Walk:
▪ No improvements are recommended
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM
Typical Development
under Current Zoning:
9 single family
dwellings 6 AM / 8 PM
Proposed Development:
6,000 square foot
Convenience Store w/
16 pumps
12 single-family
attached dwelling units
506 AM / 430 PM
6 AM / 7 PM
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 8 of 19
o Carolina Beach Road at Southern Charm Drive:
▪ No improvements are recommended
o Carolina Beach Road/Site Access 1:
▪ Install a southbound right turn lane on Carolina Beach Road with 200 feet of
storage and appropriate deceleration and taper.
NOTABLE TIA IMPROVEMENTS
Install a southbound right turn lane on
Carolina Beach Road
Extend the northbound U-turn
lane from 100 feet of
storage to 200 feet of
storage
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 9 of 19
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 10 of 19
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed
by the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. River Oaks • 108 Single-Family
detached housing units
• TIA approved July 24, 2020
• 2021 build-out year
The TIA required no improvements at any of the intersections.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• None
Development Status: Development currently under construction
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
2. Masonboro Golf
Club
• 141 Single-Family
detached housing units
• TIA approved August 16,
2018
• 2020 build-out year
The TIA required the following improvements made at SR 1576 (River Road) at The Cape Blvd
• Provide a southbound, left-turn lane on River Road with 50 feet of storage, 50 feet of
full-width deceleration and appropriate taper.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• None
Development Status: Built out
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or the Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Lord’s Creek watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class 1 suitable soils. The project is proposed to be served by Aqua.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 11 of 19
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Schools
• Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary
School, Murray Middle School, and Ashley High School. Students may apply to attend
public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
• A maximum of 9 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base
density, and 12 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an
increase of 3 dwelling units.
• Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in
homes would result in approximately 1 additional student than would be generated under
current zoning.
• The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield
as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students.
Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated
by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and
2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential
units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to
only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the most
recent New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study.
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield
(current general student generation rate) *
Existing Development Undeveloped Approximate** Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
Typical Development Under
Current Zoning 9 residential units Approximate** Total: 2
(1 elementary, 0 middle, 1 high)
Proposed Zoning 12 residential units Approximate** Total: 3
(1 elementary, 1 middle, 1 high)
*The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student
enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an
average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per
dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out-
of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech.
**Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields
with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are
rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the
approximate total.
• Since the residential components associated with the proposed rezoning are likely to have
a build-out date within 5 years per the Traffic Impact Analysis, staff has outlined existing
school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools.
• Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the
potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity
upgrades.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 11
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 12 of 19
School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year)
*Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or
planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools
to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may
be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time.
• The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC
Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data,
planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result
in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY STRATEGIC PLAN
• One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage
the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing
diversity and access to basic goods and services.
• The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 72%. Due to the
number of proposed units under the proposed R-5 district the there would be no change to the
percentage of housing type in this community area.
• The subject property is located in the Veterans Park community area, where 84% of
residents currently live within one mile of a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.).
Due to the number of units proposed, the percentage of housing units within one mile of a
community facility would not change.
Level
Total
NHC
Capacity
School
Enrollment of
Assigned
School
Capacity of
Assigned
School
w/Portables
Capacity of
Assigned
School
Funded or
Planned
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 91% Anderson 624 560 111% None
Middle 92% Murray 882 889 99% None
High 98.5% Ashley 1983 1990 99.6% None
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 12
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 13 of 19
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of R-15 (Existing Zoning):
Cottage Grove
Pages Corner
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 13
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 14 of 19
Representative Developments of Convenience Store with Fuel Station (Proposed Development):
Circle K on Airport Road
Representative Developments of R-5 (Proposed Development):
Wrightsville Place
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 14
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 15 of 19
Leeward Village
Context and Compatibility
• The property is located adjacent to Carolina Beach Road with right-in / right-out access to
the highway.
• The property is located south of Veterans Park and the elementary, middle, and high
schools; however, there is no pedestrian infrastructure in place and all traffic must travel to
a U-turn movement on Carolina Beach Road to travel north.
• The subject property is one of several undeveloped tracts along Carolina Beach Road and
acts as a buffer between the highway and lower density single-family development to the
west.
• Most of the surrounding land is either undeveloped or used for single-family development.
• There is a nearby convenience store with fuel stations, however, it is located north of Myrtle
Grove Road and is only accessible to traffic traveling north on Carolina Beach Rd.
• The subject property is located adjacent to the Tidalwater Plantation residential subdivision
to the south.
• Due to the size of the parcel and access onto Carolina Beach Road, the property is less
likely to be developed with lower density detached single family housing.
• In addition to the setback and buffer requirements of the UDO, the applicant has agreed
to additional exterior lighting conditions to reduce the potential impact on neighboring
residential uses.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 15
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 16 of 19
• While the area was zoned for low density housing in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the
2016 Comprehensive Plan recommends a mixture of commercial uses and residential
densities ranging up to 15 dwelling units per acre.
• A community meeting has been held and a TIA is under consideration for a similar
development to the north, with a convenience store and fuel stations abutting a 300-unit
apartment complex. This project has not yet been submitted to New Hanover County.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 16
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 17 of 19
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and
visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use,
recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family
residential.
Analysis
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Mixed Use,
a land use classification that promotes a mix of retail, office, and residential
development at moderate densities up to 15 units per acre. This
classification is generally applied to areas intended as community-level
service nodes and / or transitions between lower density housing and higher
intensity development.
While this site is located south of the Monkey Junction Growth Node, it is in
close proximity to another fuel station at the corner of Myrtle Grove Road,
only accessible to northbound traffic on Carolina Beach Road.
Community Mixed Use specifically identifies the Carolina Beach Road
corridor as appropriate for the place type and recommends higher-intensity
mixed use.
The purpose of the proposed B-1 district was established to provide lands
that accommodate a range of small-scale, low-intensity, neighborhood-
serving commercial development that provide goods and services to
residents of adjacent neighborhoods. The R-5 district is intended to provide
higher density single-family detached or attached housing.
This proposed mixed-use project would provide a fuel station on southbound
Carolina Beach Road in the B-1 portion, serving as a transition between the
road corridor and the existing single-family housing development to the
south and the proposed higher density single-family housing to the west.
These types of transitional and neighborhood-serving uses are appropriate
for the Community Mixed Use place type. The proposed R-5 zoning would
provide housing in this area, which is also appropriate for the Community
Mixed Use place type.
While final Traffic Impact Analysis approval is not required for
consideration of a project by the Planning Board, the final site access
location has not been determined and therefore could impact the site
design.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 17
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 18 of 19
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as
Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of uses recommended by
that place type. The residential densities are in line with those recommended
within this place type, and the project will provide housing and commercial
services to those along the Carolina Beach Road corridor and nearby
residents.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the item be continued to the February Planning Board meeting in order for the
details regarding site access to be finalized.
If the Board determines at the public hearing that sufficient information is available to support a
recommendation, staff would recommend approval with the following motion and conditions:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is
located in an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of
uses recommended by that place type, and the residential densities are in line with
those recommended within this place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of
the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will
provide housing and commercial services to those along the Carolina Beach Road
corridor and nearby residents.
Proposed Conditions:
1. A private access easement will be dedicated to establish permanent access for the
three properties to the rear of the development.
2. The bufferyard along the southern boundary will include an eight-foot-high
screening fence with a pedestrian gate and sidewalk connection from the terminus
of Southern Exposure roadway to the convenience store.
3. The owner will cancel the contract for the existing billboard on the site. The
billboard will be removed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
4. In addition to the County’s tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain
and preserve all trees as illustrated on the proposed conceptual site plan unless:
a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage
to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water/sewer lines, stormwater, etc.);
b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or
c. The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents or the
general public.
5. Staff may administratively approve any required changes to the driveway location
required by NCDOT.
6. Exterior lighting, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or
shielded so as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an imaginary
line extended from the light sources parallel to the ground. Fixtures shall be
numbered such that adequate levels of lighting are maintained, but that light
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 18
Z22-23 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 19 of 19
spillage and glare are not directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or
motorists. Light posts shall be no taller than twenty feet.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is
located in an area designated as Community Mixed Use and provides for the types of
uses recommended by that place type, and the residential densities are in line with
those recommended within this place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because it is not consistent with the
desired character of the surrounding community and will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhood.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 19
Porches Dr
T
eviotRd
F li p F l o pLnCupolaDr
Breeze W a y
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
HailshamDr
Cypress V i l lage Pl
Seaview Rd
Mcquillan Dr
Myrtl
e
G
r
o
v
e
R
d
SummerTreeLn
B o n fire Dr
Tid alw alk Dr
SouthernCharm Dr
EdgewaterMhp Rd
HillValley Walk
ChimneyLn
New Hanover County, NC
CZD B-1 & R-5R-156830 & 6844
Carolina Beach Rd
Z22-23
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-23
ZONING
B-1
O&I
I-2
R-10
R-15
CZD
Z22-23
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1
Porches Dr
T
e
v
iotRd
F li p FlopLnCupolaDr
Breeze W a y
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
HailshamDr
Cypress V i l lage Pl
Seaview Rd
Mcquillan Dr
M yrtleGroveRd
SummerTreeLn
Bonfire Dr
Tid al w alk Dr
S
outhern CharmDr
Edgewater Mhp Rd
Hill Valley Walk
C hi m n e y L n
New Hanover County, NC
CZD B-1 & R-5R-156830 & 6844
Carolina Beach Rd
Z22-23
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-23
Future Land Use
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
CONSERVATION
Z22-23
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
Bonfir e D r
Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
C u p o l a D r
Myrtle
G
r
o
v
e
R
d
Tid al w alk D r
Summer TreeLn
Southern CharmDr
Hill Valley Walk
ChimneyLn
Neighboring Parcels (500 feet)
CZD B-1 & R-5R-156830 & 6844
Carolina Beach Rd
Z22-23
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-23 6844
6830
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1
Initial Application
Documents & Materials
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1
Page 1 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com
CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION
This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s
online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart
below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the
application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Public Hearing Procedures
(Optional)
Pre-Application
Conference
1
Community
Information
Meeting
2
Application
Submittal &
Acceptance
3
Planning
Director Review
& Staff Report
(TRC Optional)
4
Public Hearing
Scheduling &
Notification
5
Planning Board
Hearing &
Recom-
mendation
6
Board of
Commissioners
Hearing &
Decision
7
Post-Decision
Limitations and
Actions
1. Applicant and Property Owner Information
Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent)
Company Company/Owner Name 2
Address Address
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip
Phone Phone
Email Email
Cindee Wolf
Design Solutions
Wilmington, NC 28406
910-620-2374
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
P.O. Box 7221
6844 Bayat Land, L.L.C.
2 Wisteria Lane
Lake Grove, NY 11755
910-599-4450 (Contact: John Izci)
johnny1861@yahoo.com
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1
Page 2 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021
2. Subject Property Information
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification
3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District:
Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the
district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the
corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District.
4. Proposed Condition(s)
Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater
restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may
be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the
surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below.
Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process.
R-15 Community Mixed-Use
6830 & 6844 Carolina Beach Road 313214.34.9634 & 313214.34.9816
3.83 Ac.+/-
(CZD) B-1 & R-5 (See Below)
* Access to the three (3) residential parcels to the rear of the subject property exists but is undocumented. A private access easement will be dedicated to establish permanent right-of-way for those properties.* The bufferyard along the southern boundary will include an eight (8) foot high screening fence with a pedestrian gate and sidewalk connection from the terminus of Southern Exposure roadway to the convenient store.* Exterior lighting, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or shielded so as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an imaginery line extended from the light sources parallel to the ground. Fixtures shall be numbered such that adequate levels of lighting are maintained, but that light spillage and glare are not directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or motorists. Light posts shall be no taller than twenty (20) feet.
The proposed project is to develop a convenience store with fuel sales along the highway frontageand buffer the commercial use from the single-family residences behind the tract with new residentialtownhomes to act as a transitional buffer.
CZD / B-1 = 2.00 ac.+/- (6000 s.f. Convenience Store)
CZD / R-5 = 1.83 ac.+/- (12 - Single-family Attached Residences)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2
Page 3 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021
5. Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for
all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
ITE Land Use:
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.)
AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips:
6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified
Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for
use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive
conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and
the community at-large.
The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional
Zoning district meets the following criteria.
1.How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as
described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc.
The policies for growth and development encourage continued efforts to attract new business.Sustainability of the County depends on sensible in-fill and maximizing use of lands. The proposeddevelopment will provide a location-efficient service to the existing pass-by traffic and extensiveresidential development occuring in this area of the County.
Convenience Market w/ Gas Pumps (945) / Attached SF Residential (215)
per Fueling Station / per dwelling unit
506 + 9 = 515 430 + 10 = 440
6000 s.f.+/- 12+/-
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3
Page 4 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021
2.How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the
2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map.
3.What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is
the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
Carolina Beach Road is an arterial roadway that supports vehicular circulation for this southernportion of the County and all of Pleasure Island. The R-15 district and a low-density of homesare certainly no longer appropriate for this land.
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies the subject tract as being in a "Community Mixed-Use"place-type. A variety of uses, including commercial services, are appropriate. Whereas there aremultiple convenience / fuel opportunities along a the eastern / northbound stretch of Carolina BechRoad, there is not a single one along the western / southbound roadway from Cathay Road untilgetting over the Snows Cut bridge and into the Town of Carolina Beach. Location efficiency of havingservices convenient to travel patterns aids in better traffic circulation while limiting unnecessaryadditonal turning movements.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4
Page 5 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the
listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as
“N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review;
Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal.
Application Checklist Applicant Initial
This application form, completed and signed
Application fee:
x $600 for 5 acres or less
x $700 for more than 5 acres
x $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review
Community meeting written summary
Traffic impact analysis (if applicable)
Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page
Reference of the property requested for rezoning
Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements:
Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
x Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements
o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type
of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed
subdivision boundaries.
o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and
height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will
occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be
used.
x Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed
rights-of-way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site;
arrangement and access provisions for parking areas.
x All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and
buffers.
x The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas.
x A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the
approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site
less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen
trees must be included.
x Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities
intended to serve the site.
x Approximate location of regulated wetlands.
x Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding
general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be
regulated by state law or local ordinance
One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be
required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan.
One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
N/A
$600 for 5 acres or less
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7
Concept Plan
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Project Name: Bayat Mixed-Use (6830 & 6844 Carolina Beach Road)
Proposed Zoning: R-15 to CZD / B-1 (2.00 ac.+/-) & CZD / R-5 (1.83 ac.+/-)
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above
zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by
first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on
April 25, 2022 . A copy of that written notice and site layout are also attached.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: Wednesday, May 11th,
6:00 p.m.; at the Veteran’s Park Picnic Shelter #2, 355 Halyburton Memorial Parkway.
The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in list
The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief presentation was given on the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the absence of a convenience store on the western side of
Carolina Beach Road from those at Cathay Road all the way across the Snows Cut bridge,
and the housing deficit in the County. The layout of the plan was shown and uses explained.
There was conversation concerning the undocumented accesses to the rear residences, and
commitment was made to dedicate an easement. The residents of Old Cape Cod community
were adamant that they did not want the stubbed right-of-way of Southern Exposure Road to
be connected to the project. Questions and concerns were also voiced about environmental
considerations of the underground tanks, lighting, and overall effects of commercial activity.
stormwater management requirements were explained. The proposed plan is intended to
address as many of the issues as possible.
Date: September 1, 2022
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 2
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 3
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 4
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 5
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 6
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500' PERIMETER OF 6844 CAROLINA BEACH RD:
OWNER ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP PROPERTY ADDRESS
6901 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE LTD 2840 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6901 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
ALFORD JACK A JR 6916 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6916 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
ALTOMARE ANTHONY P19 BIRCHWOOD CT BLAUVELT, NY 10913 804 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
ANDERSON JOHN A PATRICIA E 822 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 822 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
BARKER MICHAEL C ETAL 827 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 827 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
BARR KIMBERLEE W DWAYNE ETAL 105 STURBRIDGE DR PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854 6814 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
BAUCOM BRIAN M 615 TARBORO AVE CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 6906 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
BEARDSWORTH RICHARD REV LIV TR ETAL 2431 ALFORD LANDING DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6912 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO PO BOX 1551 RALEIGH, NC 27602 6854 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
CIRCLE K STORES INC PO BOX 52085 DC17 PHOENIX, AZ 85072 6759 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
CLARK PALMA M TRUSTEE ETAL 6921 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6921 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
DECKER THOMAS 6919 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6919 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
DEENER CHRISTIN 7110 HOLLAND LN FRANKTOWN, VA 23354 6828 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
DEENER CHRISTIN 7110 HOLLAND LN FRANKTOWN, VA 23354 6820 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
DEENER CHRISTIN 7110 HOLLAND LN FRANKTOWN, VA 23354 6818 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
DEENER CHRISTIN 7110 HOLLAND LN FRANKTOWN, VA 23354 6824 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
DEWITT LOIS P 6905 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6905 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
ELLER KRISTA M 818 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 818 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
FENNELL TRUST 24001 MARTINGALE WAY TEHACHAPI, CA 93561 824 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
FERGUSON CHARLES ERNEST 6902 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6902 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
FORTY ELEVEN 02 LLC 221 WILLIAMS RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6801 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
FOUST JACQUELINE 817 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 817 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
GANN GINA J 819 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 819 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
GREEN THOMAS 707 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 707 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
GRETES TASO 823 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 823 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
HAMILTON RICHARD J SANDRA B 110 CARROUSEL LN CARY, NC 27513 6910 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
HANSON JUDITH SAUNDERS 105 CHIMNEY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 105 CHIMNEY LN WILMINGTON
HARRIS HOWARD E ETAL 5311 DANDELION DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 6838 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
HARRIS HOWARD E JR 5311 DANDELION DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 6840 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
HATCHER BRANDY MAE ETAL 6760 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6760 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
HORTON GWENDOLYN GENEISE 18 SYRACUSE PL DURHAM, NC 27704 6808 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
JACOBS ALEXANDER E JR 6834 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6834 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
JESSIE LOGAN M ETAL 802 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 802 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
JONES ANDREA 2018 TREECREST PKWY DECATUR, GA 30035 6800 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
LAND LEASE CAROLINA LLC 2004 BALMORAL PL WILMINGTON, NC 28405 6752 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
LESLEY JEFFREY N 1121 MIL CUTOFF RD STE C201 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 808 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
LOVINGOOD MICHAEL KIRSTEN SOSA 6920 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6920 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
LOWE JOHNSIE A 1309 LEWIS CARROLL CT CHARLOTTE, NC 28213 6857 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
MCLAIN KATHERINE T 6915 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6915 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
MCNEEL TERESA K 6841 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6841 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON
MEYER MITCHELL D PATRICIA R 1014 CAROLINA BCH AVE N APT B CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 814 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
MEYER MITCHELL D PATRICIA R 1014 CAROLINA BCH AVE N APT B CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 806 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
MILONE PATRICIA L 6918 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6918 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
MINNITTE BARBARA D TRUSTEE 814 KING ST RYE BROOK, NY 10573 101 CHIMNEY LN WILMINGTON
MONTGOMERY AARON LUMA ETAL 812 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 812 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
NANCE GARY K 801 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 801 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
CFPUA 235 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403
OLD CAPE COD OWNERS ASSOC INC 822 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 821 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
OLD CHIMNEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 1409 WILMINGTON, NC 28402 101 CHIMNEY LN WILMINGTON
PHELPS KIM S 6917 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6917 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
PIKE ROBERT JR AMANDA 6904 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE BLV WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6904 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
POIRIER PATRICK R J ETAL 6913 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6913 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
RADLEY CASEY DAVIS 6903 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6903 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
RAILEY KAREN W 4913 CORONADO DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 821 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
RECCHIA TARA CARL S 4564 GRAYSTONE DR NAZARETH, PA 18064 709 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
REYES MARIA CORAZON 6908 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6908 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
ROBINSON YOLANDA M 829 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 829 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
RUSSELL JOSHUA APRIL 821 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 821 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
SCOTT NANCY B REVOCABLE TRUST 226 BLACKBEARD RD E WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6923 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
SIMMONS RICKY G ALTA G 6909 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6909 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
SMITH JUDSON C 703 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 703 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
SPAHN JULIAN E 830 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 830 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
STEELE MICHELLE M 810 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 810 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
STRICKLAND LAURIE BRIGMAN 816 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 816 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
TERHUNE DUSTIN ETAL 701 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 701 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
TESZNAR PATRICIA ANN 825 SUMMERTREE LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 825 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
TILLER PROPERTIES LLC 1823 HAWTHORNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28403 828 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
TILLER PROPERTIES LLC 1823 HAWTHORNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28403 826 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
WILEY DANIELLE 705 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 705 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
WILLIAMS CHARLES A JR LYNDA T 6110 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 6907 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
WILLIAMS CHARLES A JR LYNDA T 6110 SHILOH DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 825 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON
WILLIAMS WESTON B ETAL 6900 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6900 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
WILSON TANYA C 6911 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON, NC 28412 6911 SOUTHERN EXPOSURE WILMINGTON
YON MARIA M ROBERTO C 1012 ELSMORE DR MATTHEWS, NC 28104 820 SUMMER TREE LN WILMINGTON
ZAZZALI JOANNA M 815 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 815 SOUTHERN CHARM DR WILMINGTONPlanning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 7
P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
April 25, 2022
To: Adjacent Property Owners
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: Myrtle‐South Convenience
The owners of the property at 6844 Carolina Beach Road are interested in developing a convenience
facility for the area, along with a small townhome community. Your property is located within the
proximity of the proposed project.
This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A
Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific
standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means
that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed.
The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the
tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity
for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements,
benefits and impacts.
A meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 11th, 6:00 p.m., at the Veteran’s Park Picnic Shelter #2. The
location is off the parking lot north of the tennis courts, 355 Halyburton Memorial Parkway.
If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910‐620‐2374, or email
cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project, and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to
the community.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 8
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 9
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 10
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 10 - 1
Traffic Impact Analysis
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 11 - 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 1
Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002
119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 5917 Oleander Dr, Suite 206 NC License: NC-2522
Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403
Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377
Transportation Impact Analysis
Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development
Wilmington, NC
Prepared for 6844 Bayat Land, LLC
November 8, 2022
Analysis by: Fatimah Al Alshaik
Drafting/Graphics by: Fatimah Al Alshaik
Reviewed by: R. Steven Epley, P.E.
Erin Govea, P.E.
Sealed by: R. Steve Epley, P.E.
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific
purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others
without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and
shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
SEAL
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
11/8/2022
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 2
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development
Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development – Transportation Impact Analysis
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for 6844 Bayat Land, LLC
11/8/2022
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use development is located on an undeveloped tract of land on the
west side of US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) south of SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road) in
Wilmington, NC. It will consist of a 6,000-square-foot convenience store with 16 fueling
positions and 18 single-family attached housing (townhomes). One access point will be
constructed on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road). The expected build-out year for this
development is 2025. Information regarding the property was provided by 6844 Bayat
Land, LLC.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this
development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to
accommodate the impacts of the new development traffic.
The Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) was performed based on the scope agreed
upon with Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) and North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT). This site has a trip generation potential of 515
trips in the AM peak hour and 435 trips in the PM peak hour.
Based on the capacity analysis, recommendations have been given where necessary to
mitigate the impacts of future traffic. Improvements are summarized in Table A and
Figure A.
In conclusion, this study has determined the potential traffic impacts of this
development. Recommendations have been given to accommodate these impacts. The
analysis indicates that with the recommended improvements in place, the proposed site
is not expected to have a detrimental effect on transportation capacity and mobility in
the study area. The recommendations in Figure A and in Table A should be constructed
to comply with applicable NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North
Carolina Highways standards.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 3
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development
Table A – Recommended Improvements
INTERSECTION RECOMMENDATIONS
Carolina Beach Road at Myrtle
Grove Road
Extend the northbound U-turn lane from 100
feet of storage to 200 feet of storage
Carolina Beach Road at
Hill Valley Walk No improvements are recommended.
Carolina Beach Road at
Southern Charm Drive No improvements are recommended.
Carolina Beach Road/Site
Access 1
Install a southbound right turn lane on Carolina
Beach Road with 200 feet of storage and
appropriate deceleration and taper.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 4
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
This document, together with the concepts and designs
presented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improperreliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
SPEEDLIMIT
45
SPEED
LIMIT
55
SPEED
LIMIT
25
~1
2
5
0
f
e
e
t
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
~5
2
5
f
e
e
t
15
0
'
20
0
'
375'
15
0
'
55
0
'
22
5
'
60
0
'
~7
2
5
f
e
e
t
Site Drive 1
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
MYRTLE GROVEMIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
20
0
'
FIGURE A
RECOMMENDED
IMPROVEMENTS
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 5
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 1
Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development – Transportation Impact Analysis
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for 6844 Bayat Land, LLC
11/8/2022
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2
Figure 1 – Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2A – Site Location Map ............................................................................................... 4
Figure 2B – Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 6
2.1 Inventory .............................................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3 – Existing Lane Geometry ....................................................................................... 7
Figure 4 – 2022 Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................................................ 8
3.0 Approved Development and Committed Improvements ..................................... 9
3.1 Approved Developments .................................................................................................. 9
3.2 Committed Improvements ................................................................................................ 9
4.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 9
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards .................................................................................. 9
4.2 Growth Rate ........................................................................................................................ 9
4.3 Future No Build Volumes .................................................................................................. 9
4.4 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................ 10
4.5 Trip Distribution ................................................................................................................ 11
4.6 New Site and Pass-By Trips .......................................................................................... 11
4.7 Future Build Volumes ...................................................................................................... 11
Figure 5 – Future No Build Volumes ................................................................................... 12
Figure 6 – Primary Trip Distribution .................................................................................... 13
Figure 7 – Primary Site Trips ................................................................................................ 14
Figure 8 – Pass-By Trip Distribution ................................................................................... 15
Figure 9 – Pass-by Site Trips ............................................................................................... 16
Figure 10 – Total Site Trips .................................................................................................. 17
Figure 11 – Future Build Volumes ....................................................................................... 18
5.0 Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................. 19
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................. 19
5.2 Queuing Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Level of Service and Queue Results ............................................................................ 20
6.0 Summary and Conclusion ................................................................................... 26
Figure 12–Recommended Improvements .......................................................................... 27
Appendix ...................................................................................................................... 28
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 6
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 2
Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development – Transportation Impact Analysis
New Hanover County, NC
Prepared for 6844 Bayat Land, LLC
11/8/2022
1.0 Introduction
The proposed development is to be located on an undeveloped tract of land on the west
side of US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) south of SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road) in
Wilmington, NC. The site plan shows a mixed-use development with a 6,000-square-
foot convenience store with 16 fueling positions and 18 single-family attached housing
(townhomes) and is provided in Figure 1. The planned build-out year for this
development is 2025.
One access point will be constructed on US 421 (Carolina Beach Road). A site location
map and a vicinity map are provided in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively.
DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this
development and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to
accommodate the impacts of the new development traffic. The following intersections
were included in the study:
1. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road) (signalized)
2. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 2364 (Southern Charm Drive)/ Hill Valley
Walk (RCI - unsignalized)
3. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (future right-in/right-out)
These intersections were analyzed during the AM and PM peak hours for the following
conditions:
2022 Existing Conditions.
2025 Future No Build Conditions.
2025 Future Build Conditions.
2025 Future Build Conditions with Improvements.
This Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) was performed based on the scope agreed
upon with Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) and North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT). Information regarding the property was
provided by 6844 Bayat Land, LLC.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 7
FIGURE 1
SITE PLAN
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 8
FIGURE 2A
SITE LOCATION MAP
SITE INDICATOR
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 9
FIGURE 2B
VICINITY MAP
STUDY INTERSECTIONS
EXISTING
PROPOSED
SITE
2
1
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 10
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 6
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Inventory
Table 2.1 presents a summary of the study area roadways. Figure 3 presents the
existing lane geometry.
Table 2.1 - Street Inventory
Facility Name Route #
Typical
Cross
Section
2019
AADT
(vpd)
Pavement
Width
Posted
Speed
Limit
Maintained
By
Carolina Beach Road US 421 4-lane
divided 35,500 12-foot
lanes 55 MPH NCDOT
Myrtle Grove Road SR 1492 2-lane
undivided 5,100 12-foot
lanes 45 MPH NCDOT
Southern Charm Drive SR 2364 2-lane
undivided
not
available
12-foot
lanes 25 MPH NCDOT
Hill Valley Walk n/a 1-lane not
available gravel n/a unknown
2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes for this project were collected by True Direction Traffic Services,
Inc. Table 2.2 shows the location, dates, and time periods of these counts. Traffic
volumes were not balanced due to the presence of driveways and the distance between
study intersections. Figure 4 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes. The full
reports for these volumes can be found in the appendix.
Table 2.2 - Traffic Volume Data
Count Location: Date Taken: Time Periods:
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Wednesday,
February 16, 2022
7:00 AM – 9:00 AM
4:00 PM – 6:00 PM
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)/Hill Valley Walk
Wednesday,
February 16, 2022
7:00 AM – 9:00 AM
4:00 PM – 6:00 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 11
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
ROADWAY
LEGEND
This document,together with the concepts and designs
presented herein,is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared.Reuse of,or improper
reliance on,this document by others without written
authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of
the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
~1
2
5
0
f
e
e
t
33
,
5
0
0
5,100
35
,
5
0
0
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
15
0
'
10
0
'
375'15
0
'
550'
22
5
'
600'
SPEED
LIMIT
55
SPEED
LIMIT
45
SPEED
LIMIT
25
FIGURE 3
EXISTING LANE
GEOMETRY
2019 AADT
VOLUMESXXXX
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 12
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improperreliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
FIGURE 4
2022 EXISTING
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
87 / 25
137 / 225
88
/
1
2
1
81
3
/
1
0
5
7
50
/
1
3
4
11
5
2
/
9
4
0
1 /
3
3 / 2
41
/
3
7
91
5
/
1
2
5
3
0 /
0
11
6
3
/
1
0
4
0
5 / 5
36 / 32
7 / 14
4 / 4
4
/
2
1
91
1
/
1
2
3
2
3 / 7
11
6
3
/
1
0
4
0
11
/
1
8
MYRTLEGROVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion Management
Guidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 13
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 9
3.0 Approved Development and Committed Improvements
3.1 Approved Developments
Approved developments are developments that have been recently approved in the
area, but not yet constructed. Per NCDOT, there are no approved developments to be
included in this study.
3.2 Committed Improvements
Committed Improvements are improvements that are planned by NCDOT, City of
Wilmington, or a developer in the area, but which are not yet constructed. Per NCDOT,
there are no committed improvements to be included in this study.
4.0 Methodology
4.1 Base Assumptions and Standards
In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted
NCDOT standards. The following Table 4.1 contains a summary of the base
assumptions:
Table 4.1 - Assumptions
Growth Rate 1% annually
Analysis Software Synchro/SimTraffic
Lane widths 12 feet
Peak Hour Factor 0.90
Truck percentage 2%
4.2 Growth Rate
An annual growth rate of 1.0% was approved by NCDOT/WMPO and was based on
observed growth in the area along with consistency with adjacent TIAs.
4.3 Future No Build Volumes
The 2025 future no build traffic volumes were computed by applying one percent (1.0%)
compounded annual growth rate to the 2022 existing traffic volumes. Figure 5 shows
2025 future no build traffic volumes for AM and PM peaks.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 14
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 10
4.4 Trip Generation
The proposed site development will contain a convenience store of up to 6,000 square
feet with 16 fueling positions and 18 townhomes (single-family attached housing). The
trip generation potential of this site was projected based on the 11th edition of ITE Trip
Generation Manual. Table 4.2 presents the results.
Table 4.2 - ITE Trip Generation
Myrtle Grove Mixed Use, Wilmington, NC
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 - Hour AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Two-Way
Land Use ITE Land
Code Size Data
Source Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit
Single-Family
Attached Housing 215 18 Dwelling
Units
Adjacent -
Rate 130 3 6 6 4
Gasoline/Service
Station with
Convenience Market
(6K Sq Ft)
945 16
Vehicle
Fueling
Positions
Adjacent -
Rate 5,532 253 253 215 215
Unadjusted Trips 5,662 256 259 221 219
Internal Capture Overall % (1), (2) -- 0.0% 1.1%
Internal Capture: Retail Trips Reduction -- 0 0 0 -2
Internal Capture: Residential Trips Reduction -- 0 0 -2 -1
Total Internal Trips Reduction -- 0 0 -2 -3
Retail -- 253 253 215 213
Residential -- 3 6 4 3
Total External Full Build Trips -- 256 259 219 216
Pass-By (LU 945) AM @ 76%, PM @ 75 % (3) -- -192 -192 -161 -161
Pass-by permitted at 10% of Total Adjacent Volume -48 -48 -65 -65
Total Pass-by Reduction -- -48 -48 -65 -65
Total Adjusted (Primary) Trips -- 208 211 154 151
(1) Per NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool (See worksheets for more information)
(2) Internal Capture less than 10% of Full Build Unadjusted Trips (3) Pass-by permitted by 11th Edition methodology
Some visitors to the site will use both the gas station/convenience store and residential
uses, which is considered “internal capture.” To avoid double-counting trips, internal
capture trips were calculated using the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation
Tool, yielding a reduction of 0% in the AM peak hour and 1.1% in the PM peak hour.
The worksheets for the internal capture are shown in the supporting documentation in
the Appendix.
Next, for a site of this type, trips are broken down into two categories: primary and pass-
by trips. Primary trips are new trips that are not already on the road. Pass-by trips are
existing traffic on the adjacent street (US 421) that will turn into the site, then exit to
continue in the direction they were originally traveling.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 15
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 11
4.5 Trip Distribution
Site trips for this proposed development were distributed based on the existing traffic
patterns and engineering judgment. The primary trip distribution model is shown in
Figure 6 with the resulting trips shown in Figure 7. The directional distribution for new
primary site trips is:
60% to/from the North on US 421
30% to/from the South on US 421
10% to/from the northeast on Myrtle Grove Road
All pass-by trips are assumed to originate from the north on US 421 due to the ease of
turning right into and out of the proposed development and nearby competitors.
4.6 New Site and Pass-By Trips
New site trips were calculated based on taking the total unadjusted trips, subtracting the
internal capture and the pass-by trips, and then multiplying that by the trip distributions.
Pass-by trips for retail were determined to all be traveling southbound. The new site
trips were added to the pass-by trips and the resulting total trips are shown in Figure 10.
4.7 Future Build Volumes
Future Build volumes were computed as the sum of existing volumes plus one percent
(1%) growth rate, projected pass-by trips, and projected site trips. The resulting Future
Build volumes are shown in Figure 11.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 16
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improperreliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
90 / 26
142 / 232
91
/
1
2
5
83
8
/
1
0
9
0
52
/
1
3
9
11
8
7
/
9
6
9
1 /
3
3 / 2
44
/
3
9
94
3
/
1
2
9
1
0 /
0
11
9
9
/
1
0
7
2
6 / 6
38 / 33
8 / 15
5 / 5
5
/
2
2
93
9
/
1
2
7
0
3 / 8
11
9
9
/
1
0
7
2
12
/
1
9
FIGURE 5
2025 NO BUIILD
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
MYRTLEGROVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion Management
Guidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 17
*** NOT TO SCALE ***This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of
the agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECTNUMBER 220201
FIGURE 6
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
60
%
I
N
10% IN
10
%
O
U
T
60
%
O
U
T
30
%
I
N
70
%
O
U
T
30
%
O
U
T
30
%
O
U
T
30
%
I
N
30
%
I
N
70% OUT
Site Drive 1
10
0
%
I
N
100% OUT
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
ROADWAY
LEGEND
ORIGIN/DESTINATION
NODE
10%
60%
100%
%
30%
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 18
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
FIGURE 7
PRIMARY SITE TRIPS
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
12
5
/
9
2
0
/
0
0 / 0
21 / 15
21
/
1
5
12
7
/
9
1
62
/
4
6
14
8
/
1
0
6
63
/
4
5
0 /
0
63
/
4
5
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
62
/
4
6
0 /
0
62
/
4
6
0 / 0
148 / 106
0 / 0
Site Drive 1
0
/
0
20
8
/
1
5
4
211 / 151
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USEDEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
0 /
0
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion ManagementGuidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 19
*** NOT TO SCALE ***This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of
the agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.PROJECT NUMBER 220201
FIGURE 8
PASS-BY TRIP
DISTRIBUTION
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
Site Drive 1
10
0
%
I
N
100% OUT
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
ROADWAY
LEGEND
ORIGIN/DESTINATION
NODE
100%
%
MYRTLEGROVE MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
-1
0
0
%
I
N
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 20
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
0 /
0
0
/
0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 /
0
0
/
0
0 /
0
0 /
0
0 /
0
0 /
0
0 /
0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 /
0
0 /
0
0
/
0
0 / 0
0 / 0
0 / 0
Site Drive 1
-4
8
/
-
6
5
48
/
6
5
48 / 65
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
FIGURE 9
PASS-BY SITE TRIPS
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USEDEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
0 /
0
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion ManagementGuidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 21
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
12
5
/
9
2
0
/
0
0 /0
21 /15
21
/
1
5
12
7
/
9
1
62
/
4
6
14
8
/
1
0
6
63
/
4
5
0 /
0
63
/
4
5
0 /0
0 /0
0 /0
62
/
4
6
0
/
0
62
/
4
6
0 /0
148 /106
0 /0
Site Drive 1
-4
8
/
-
6
5
25
6
/
2
1
9
259 /216
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USEDEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
FIGURE 10
TOTAL SITE TRIPS
0
/
0
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion ManagementGuidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 22
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
This document, together with the concepts and designspresented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper
reliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall bewithout liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
96
3
/
1
1
8
2
91
/
1
2
5
90 /26
163 /247
73
/
1
5
4
13
1
4
/
1
0
6
0
63
/
4
9
19
2
/
1
4
5
10
0
6
/
1
3
3
6
5 /
2
2
10
0
2
/
1
3
1
5
3 /8
8 /15
5 /5
12
6
1
/
1
1
1
8
0
/
0
12
6
1
/
1
1
1
8
6 /6
186 /139
3 /2
Site Drive 1
93
5
/
1
2
6
5
25
6
/
2
1
9
259 /216
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
MYRTLE GROVE MIXED-USEDEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
12
/
1
9
FIGURE 11
2025 FUTURE BUIILD
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
** A minimum of 4 vehicles per hour is analyzed for each
movement per NCDOT Congestion ManagementGuidelines
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 23
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 19
5.0 Capacity Analysis
5.1 Level of Service Evaluation Criteria
The Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) utilizes the
term “level of service” (LOS) to measure how traffic operates in intersections and on
roadway segments. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F as
shown in Table 5.1. Level of service “A” represents low-volume traffic operations and
level of service “F” represents high-volume, oversaturated traffic operations. Synchro
traffic modeling software was used to determine the LOS and delay for studied
intersections. For unsignalized intersection analyses, the LOS noted is for the worst
approach of the intersection, which is typically the left-turn movement for the side street
approach, due to the number of opposing movements. Worksheet reports from the
analyses are provided in the Appendix.
5.2 Queuing Evaluation
A queuing analysis was performed using Synchro and SimTraffic simulation, based on a
minimum 10-minute seeding, a 60-minute recording period, and 10 runs. The maximum
SimTraffic queues and Synchro 95% queues are provided, along with the turn lane
lengths. Queue reports can be found in the Appendix.
Table 5.1 – Highway Capacity Manual
Levels of Service and Control Delay Criteria
Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
Level of Service Control Delay Per vehicle
(seconds) Level of Service Delay Range
(seconds)
A 10 A 10
B 10 and 20 B 10 and 15
C 20 and 35 C 15 and 25
D 35 and 55 D 25 and 35
E 55 and 80 E 35 and 50
F 80 F 50
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 24
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 20
5.3 Level of Service and Queue Results
The LOS and queue results are summarized in Tables 5.3.1 to 5.3.4. The results of the
level of service analysis are discussed by intersection in the following paragraphs.
Queues are shown to be contained by available storage during the AM and PM peak
hours under each scenario.
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road)
This signalized intersection currently operates at LOS B during the AM and PM peaks.
The LOS is projected to remain the same for the Future No Build and Build conditions
during the AM and PM peaks. The analysis shows that the northbound U-turn queue
exceeds the available storage and should be extended from 100’ feet of storage to 200
feet of storage. The northbound right-turn reports a max queue exceeding the storage
length but SimTraffic observation showed minimal queue at intersection.
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Hill Valley Walk
The southbound U-turn approach of US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) operates at LOS C
during the AM and PM peaks under Existing and Future No Build conditions. Under
Future Build conditions, the AM peak is projected to operate at LOS E while the PM
peak hour remains LOS C.
NCDOT has developed a methodology that provides guidance when determining the
need for signalization at intersections with fewer than four legs, such as at a median U-
turn opening. The document Guidelines for Signalization of Intersections with Two or
Three Approaches provides charts to support the decision-making process. Applicable
charts are presented in the Appendix. The chart indicates that only the AM peak hour
was slightly above the 95-percent curve and the PM peak hour was well below the
curve. The NCDOT Capacity Analysis Guidelines BEST PRACTICES document
recommends “consider monitoring for signalization.”
A signal is not recommended because:
adequate storage is available to contain the U-turn queue,
there are no conflicting right-turn movements to the U-turn,
the approach delay is only LOS E during the AM peak hour, which is commonly
observed for side streets under stop control when accessing a busy highway,
the approach is modeled as a stop condition but would operate under yield
condition with expected lower delays, and
with the convenience store pass-by trips capped at ten percent for the primary
land use the analysis is conservative.
No improvements are recommended at this location.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 25
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 21
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) and SR 2364 (Southern Charm Drive)
The northbound stop-controlled approach of US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) operates at
LOS C during the AM peak and PM peak. The LOS is projected to remain the same for
the 2025 Future No Build and 2025 Future Build conditions during the AM and PM
peaks. No improvements are recommended at this location.
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) and Site Access
This proposed stop-controlled Site Access approach is projected to operate at LOS D in
AM and LOS E in the PM peak under 2025 Future Build conditions. Based on NCDOT
turn lane warrants and projected volumes, a southbound right-turn lane is warranted.
The nomograph suggests 400 feet of storage; however, the analysis does not indicate a
need for that amount of storage. It is recommended to provide a southbound right-turn
lane with 200 feet of storage and an appropriate taper. Restrict the driveway to right-
in/right-out turn movements only. This access should be designed according to NCDOT
standards. With this improvement, the eastbound approach is anticipated to operate at
LOS C in the morning and LOS D in the PM peak.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 26
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 22
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)146 0 7 380 0 105 125
Max Queue (ft)118 70 48 274 96 102 76
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)158 0 7 411 0 112 135
Max Queue (ft)128 66 31 272 135 119 89
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)200 0 57 506 0 131 185
Max Queue (ft)145 92 198 271 225 110 123
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 200 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)200 0 57 506 0 131 185
Max Queue (ft)150 95 200 267 225 112 112
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)207 0 8 318 0 126 207
Max Queue (ft)187 11 31 231 101 144 147
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)218 0 8 331 0 132 216
Max Queue (ft)198 6 28 254 161 150 144
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 100 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)276 0 60 450 0 164 315
Max Queue (ft)235 15 172 241 213 146 179
LRUTRLT
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL 200 FULL 125 150 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)276 0 60 450 0 164 315
Max Queue (ft)229 6 212 248 213 151 174
2025 Build
IMP
B (19.6)D (38.4)
2025 NoBuild
B (16.9)C (33.3) B (18.9)
D (38.4)
2025 Build
B (19.6)
2022 Existing
B (13.6)
2025 NoBuild
B (14.2)
2025 Build
B (16.1)
Table 5.3.1 - LOS and Queueing Analysis for Carolina Beach Road
and Myrtle Grove Road
AM Peak Hour
Scenario Overall LOS
Level of Service (Delay) per Movement & by Approach (Delay in
seconds/vehicle)
Northbound SouthboundWestbound
C (22.7)
C (23.6) B (16.5) A (8.6)
C (28.5) B (18.6) A (9.7)
B (15.9) A (8.3)
C (28.5) B (18.6) A (9.7)
C (32.2) B (18.4) B (11.1)
PM Peak Hour
2025 Build
IMP
B (16.1)
2022 Existing
B (16.4)
B (11.5)
B (13.2)C (22.1)
B (13.2)C (22.1)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 27
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 23
Eastbound Westbound Northbound
LT R TR
C (18.7) B (13.8) A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)13 0 0
Max Queue (ft)57 20 0
LT R TR
C (19.8)B (14.1)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)15 0 0
Max Queue (ft)60 20 4
LT R TR
E (39.3)B (14.6)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)120 0 0
Max Queue (ft)231 21 0
LT R TR
E (39.3)B (14.6)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)120 0 0
Max Queue (ft)251 22 0
LT R TR
C (16.8)B (12.9)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)10 0 0
Max Queue (ft)55 20 0
LT R TR
C (17.6)B (13.2)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)10 0 0
Max Queue (ft)60 20 0
LT R TR
C (23.7)B (13.5)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)58 0 0
Max Queue (ft)155 21 0
LT R TR
C (23.7)B (13.5)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)550 FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)58 0 0
Max Queue (ft)120 22 0
Table 5.3.2 - LOS and Queueing Analysis for Carolina Beach Road and Hill Valley Walk
AM Peak Hour
Scenario LOS of Worst
Approach
Level of Service (Delay) per Movement & by Approach
(Delay in seconds/vehicle)
PM Peak Hour
2022 Existing
C (18.7)
EB Approach
2025 NoBuild
C (19.8)
EB Approach
2025 Build
E (39.3)
EB Approach
2025 Build
IMP
E (39.3)
EB Approach
2025 Build
IMP
C (23.7)
EB Approach
2022 Existing
C (16.8)
EB Approach
2025 NoBuild
C (17.6)
EB Approach
2025 Build
C (23.7)
EB Approach
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 28
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 24
Eastbound Westbound Southbound
RLTTR
B (12.1) C (16.1) A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)030
Max Queue (ft)25 42 0
LTTR
B (12.3)C (16.7)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)030
Max Queue (ft)24 35 0
LTTR
B (12.7)C (17.8)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)500
Max Queue (ft)22 41 0
LTTR
B (12.7)C (17.8)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)500
Max Queue (ft)26 41 0
LTTR
B (14.4)C (20.4)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)380
Max Queue (ft)24 45 0
LTTR
B (14.8)C (21.9)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)380
Max Queue (ft)29 46 0
LTTR
C (15.1)C (22.9)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)380
Max Queue (ft)34 52 0
LTTR
C (15.1)C (22.9)A (0.0)
Available Storage (ft)FULL 550 FULL
95th% Queue (ft)380
Max Queue (ft)29 46 0
2025 Build
IMP
C (22.9)
WB Approach
2022 Existing
C (20.4)
WB Approach
2025 NoBuild
C (21.9)
WB Approach
2025 Build
C (22.9)
WB Approach
PM Peak Hour
2022 Existing
C (16.1)
WB Approach
2025 NoBuild
C (16.7)
WB Approach
2025 Build
C (17.8)
WB Approach
2025 Build
IMP
C (17.8)
WB Approach
Table 5.3.3 - LOS and Queueing Analysis for Carolina Beach Road and Southern Charm Drive
AM Peak Hour
Scenario LOS of Worst
Approach
Level of Service (Delay) per Movement & by Approach
(Delay in seconds/vehicle)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 29
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 25
Eastbound
RTTR
D (33.1)
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)135 0 0
Max Queue (ft)132 0 11
RTTR
C (21.4)
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)90 0 0
Max Queue (ft)168 0 0
RTTR
E (44.9)
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)148 0 0
Max Queue (ft)154 11 9
RTTR
D (29.4)
Available Storage (ft)FULL FULL FULL
95th% Queue (ft)105 0 0
Max Queue (ft)160 6 0
2025 Build
IMP
D (29.4)
EB Approach A (0.0)
A (0.0)
2025 Build
E (44.9)
EB Approach
PM Peak Hour
2025 Build
D (33.1)
EB Approach
2025 Build
IMP
C (21.4)
EB Approach
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
Table 5.3.4 - LOS and Queueing Analysis for Carolina Beach Road / Site Access
AM Peak Hour
Scenario LOS of Worst
Approach
Level of Service (Delay) per Movement & by Approach
(Delay in seconds/vehicle)
Southbound
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 30
11/8/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 26
6.0 Summary and Conclusion
The purpose of this report is to assess the transportation impact of the proposed Myrtle
Grove Mixed-Use development that will be located on an undeveloped tract of land on
the west side of US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) south of SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road)
in Wilmington, NC. This mixed-use development is planned to consist of a 6,000-
square-foot convenience store with 16 fueling positions and 18 single-family attached
housing (townhomes). One access point will be constructed on US 421 (Carolina Beach
Road). The planned build-out year for this development is 2025.
Based on trip generation rates and equations published in the 11th Edition of the
Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, this development has a
trip generation potential of 5,662 daily trips with 515 trips in the AM peak hour and 435
trips in the PM peak hour.
In conclusion, this analysis has been conducted based on NCDOT and WMPO
guidelines. The study has reviewed the impacts of background traffic and proposed
development traffic and has identified improvements, where necessary, to
accommodate future traffic demand. The recommended improvements at the study
intersections are summarized in Table 6.1 and shown in Figure 12. With the
recommended improvements in place, the anticipated transportation impacts of the
proposed development can be accommodated. Site accesses should be designed
according to NCDOT and Wilmington standards as applicable.
Table 6.1 – Recommended Improvements
INTERSECTION RECOMMENDATIONS
Carolina Beach Road at Myrtle
Grove Road
Extend the northbound U-turn lane from 100
feet of storage to 200 feet of storage
Carolina Beach Road at
Hill Valley Walk No improvements are recommended.
Carolina Beach Road at
Southern Charm Drive No improvements are recommended.
Carolina Beach Road/Site
Access 1
Install a southbound right turn lane on Carolina
Beach Road with 200 feet of storage and
appropriate deceleration and taper.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 31
*** NOT TO SCALE ***
SIGNAL
STOP
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ROADWAY
LEGEND
AM / PM PEAKS
This document, together with the concepts and designs
presented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improperreliance on, this document by others without writtenauthorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation ofthe agreement betweenDAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
SPEEDLIMIT
45
SPEED
LIMIT
55
SPEED
LIMIT
25
~1
2
5
0
f
e
e
t
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
~5
2
5
f
e
e
t
15
0
'
20
0
'
375'
15
0
'
55
0
'
22
5
'
60
0
'
~7
2
5
f
e
e
t
Site Drive 1
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
MYRTLE GROVEMIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT
WILMINGTON, NC
20
0
'
FIGURE 12
RECOMMENDED
IMPROVEMENTS
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 32
11/7/2022 220201 - Myrtle Grove Mixed-Use Development 28
Appendix
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 33
Approved Scoping Documents
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 34
February 9, 2022
Mr. Steve Epley, PE
DAVENPORT
4600 Marriott Drive, Suite 340
Raleigh, NC 27612
RE: Approved Scope for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed
Bayat mixed use development in New Hanover County, NC.
Dear Mr. Epley:
Based on the information provided and conversations held to date, it is our understanding that the proposed
Bayat mixed use development has a build out year of 2025, and will consist of:
o ITE Land Use Code 215 – 30 dwelling units of Single-family homes (attached)
o ITE Land Use Code 945 – 6,000 SF of Convenience Store/Fueling station (16 fueling positions)
Below please find the scope to be used in the Traffic Impact Analysis:
1. Data Collection – Analysis Parameters:
2.
a. Study Intersections
For existing intersections, provide turning movement counts, including pedestrians for weekday
during school (T, W,TH) morning (7:00am-9:00am) and afternoon (4:00pm-6:00pm) peak periods:
1. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) and SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road)
2. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) and Hill Valley Walk – leftover RCI
3. US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) and Site Access driveway (Right-in/Right-out)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 35
Bayat mixed use (New Hanover County) Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) scope
Page 2 of 3
b. Site Trip Generation, Site Trip Distribution and Background Traffic Assumptions:
i. Site Trip Generation Estimate
1. Trip Generation
o Use 11th Edition of ITE Trip Generation Manual
2. Site Trip Distribution
o The site access operations must be submitted and approved before use in TIA.
3. Adjacent Development (approved but not yet built):
o None
4. Background Traffic Assumptions
o Build year – 2025
o Growth Rate – 1% per year
Capacity Analysis: Weekday AM & PM Peak Hour b. Technical Analysis to use current signal timing and existing geometry and lane configurations.
i. 2022 Existing Conditions
ii. 2025 Future No-Build
[Existing + 1% background growth]
iii. 2025 Build Conditions
[Existing + 1% background growth + site trips]
iv. 2025 Build Conditions w/ Mitigation
[Existing + 1% background growth + site trips + improvements]
2. Final Report Submittal:
a. Completed TIA Application
b. Signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer
c. Electronic copy submitted via file share link to include PDF of TIA and Synchro output files as
well as digital Synchro files
3. Notes:
a. This scope shall remain valid for three months from the date of this letter
b. Please note that if any changes occur (including but not limited to: land use, intensity, phasing,
and/or site access) additional analysis may be required.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 36
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 37
Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002
119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 5917 Oleander Dr, Suite 206
Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403
Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377
January 31, 2022
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Scoping Request
Bayat Mixed Use (DAVENPORT Project Number 220201)
New Hanover County, NC
Proposed Land Uses
LUC 945 – 6000 sq ft Convenience Store/Fueling Station (5-10k sq ft/16 fueling positions)
LUC 220 – 30 Townhomes (6 buildings @ 5 units each)
Proposed Study Intersections
1.US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Rd) (full movement-signalized)
2.US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Hill Valley Walk (non-system) - leftover (RCI - unsignalized)
3.US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Site Access (right-in/right-out)
Proposed annual growth rate – 1% for all roadway unless otherwise directed.
Analysis Periods – Weekday AM peak (7:00-9:00 am) and PM peak (4:00-6:00 pm)
TIA Analysis Scenarios:
•2022 Existing Conditions
•2025 Future No-Build Conditions
•2025 Future Build Conditions
•2025 Future Build Conditions with Improvements (as necessary)
Trip Generation – Based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition, (10 Ed trip gen incl for comparison)
Proposed site trip directional distribution – TBD based on background counts
Existing Traffic Counts – Counts to be collected at:
1.US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Rd) (full movement-signalized)
2.US 421 (Carolina Beach Road) at Hill Valley Walk (non-system) leftover (RCI - unsignalized)
Approved developments – n/a unless instructed otherwise
Committed Improvements – n/a unless instructed otherwise
Other Remarks –
Received 01/31/22
Agreed. 11th Edition215
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 38
FIGURE 1
SITE PLAN
shift further south
along CBR
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 39
FIGURE 2A
SITE LOCATION MAP SITE INDICATOR
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 40
FIGURE 2B
VICINITY MAP
STUDY INTERSECTIONS
BACKGROUND
PROPOSED
SITE
2
1
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 41
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 42
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 43
Trip Generation Summary
Open Date:
Analysis Date:
1/26/2022
1/26/2022Project: Bayat Mixed Use
Alternative:Alternative 1
Phase:
ITE Land Use Enter Exit Enter ExitEnter Exit TotalTotal Total ***
Weekday Average Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour of
Adjacent Street Traffic
Weekday PM Peak Hour of
Adjacent Street Traffic
220 Townhomes(6 Bldgs- 5 units each)
30 Dwelling Units
93 93 186 3 12 15 13 7 20
945 GASSTATION-CONV 1 (6K Sq Ft)
16 Vehicle Fueling Positions
1643 1643 3286 102 98 200 114 110 224
Unadjusted Volume 1736 1736 3472 105 110 215 127 117 244
Internal Capture Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 62 62 124 63 63 126
1736 1736 3472 43 48 91 64 54 118
Pass-By Trips
Volume Added to Adjacent Streets
Total Weekday Average Daily Trips Internal Capture = 0 Percent
Total Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent
Total Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent
P. 1TRIP GENERATION 10, TRAFFICWARE, LLC
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition
- Custom rate used for selected time period.*
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 44
1
Steven Epley
From:Koilada, Krupanidhi <kkoilada1@ncdot.gov>
Sent:Wednesday, April 6, 2022 5:38 PM
To:Steven Epley
Cc:Vafier, Ken; jgriffee@nhcgov.com; Scott James; Mathis, Stonewall D; Leonard, Jessi L; Hughes,
Benjamin T; Roan, Jon; Vielkanowitz, Denys; Thomas C. Bradshaw
Subject:RE: [External] FW: DAVENPORT project for discussion 220201 _ Bayet Mixed Use _ Step 2
Attachments:220201 Bayat Mixes Uses Scoping Document Step 2 - 3-8-22_comments.pdf
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
Steve,
Attached are the comments on step 2 items for Bayat Mixed. Please update them accordingly and resubmit them along
with step 3 items for review.
Also provide the TMC files for the study intersections. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Krupa Koilada
Senior Assistant Traffic Engineer
Division 3 Traffic
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Office: 910 341 2207
Cell: 704 906 4143
Email: kkoilada1@ncdot.gov
5504 Barbados Boulevard
Castle Hayne, NC 28429-5646
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Scott James <Scott.James@wilmingtonnc.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 8:18 AM
To: Mathis, Stonewall D <sdmathis@ncdot.gov>; Koilada, Krupanidhi <kkoilada1@ncdot.gov>; Leonard, Jessi L
<jleonard6@ncdot.gov>; Hughes, Benjamin T <bthughes@ncdot.gov>; Roan, Jon <jroan@ncdot.gov>; Vielkanowitz,
Denys <denys.vielkanowitz@wilmingtonnc.gov>; Thomas C. Bradshaw <Thomas.Bradshaw@wilmingtonnc.gov>
Cc: Vafier, Ken <kvafier@nhcgov.com>; jgriffee@nhcgov.com
Subject: [External] FW: DAVENPORT project for discussion 220201 _ Bayet Mixed Use _ Step 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 45
2
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Good morning,
Please find attached the Step 2 submittal for Bayat Mixed Use development in NHC.
Let me know if you have any questions, or difficulties with the attachment.
Scott
Scott A. James, P.E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
Wilmington MPO
Desk line (910) 473 ‐ 5130
From: Steven Epley [mailto:SEpley@davenportworld.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 5:38 PM
To: Scott James <Scott.James@wilmingtonnc.gov>; Don Bennett <DBennett@davenportworld.com>
Subject: DAVENPORT project for discussion 220201 _ Bayet Mixed Use _ Step 2
Scott
Attached is the documentation for Step 2 of the Bayet Mixed Use Development – Davenport #220201.
If you have any comments or need clarification on details we are available via email, phone, or a Wednesday
Development Review meeting.
Items of note
1. WMPO suggested moving the driveway further south on US 421. Developer updated Site Plan (Figure 1). Due to
the shift and internal circulation requirements, fewer townhomes (30 to 18) have been proposed and reflected
in Trip Gen table. ITE graphs included in appendix.
2. Pass‐by reduction percentages based on ITE Trip Gen 11, (ITE Tables included), Trip Gen table includes Trip Gen
10 and CM 10% cap for comparison.
3. Pass‐by is disproportionally toward Southbound traffic. Rational is due to US 421 is median divided at site,
driver expectations, and number of competing properties within close proximity.
Thanks,
Steve
Steven Epley | Traffic Project Manager
DAVENPORT
4600 Marriott Drive, Suite 340 | Raleigh, NC 27612
t (919) 324-1665 ext: 24413
www.davenportworld.com
E‐mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 46
3
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 47
24 Hour
Two-Way
Land Use ITE Land
Code
Data
Source Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit
Single-Family Attached Housing 215 18 Dwelling Units Adjacent -
Rate 130 3 6 6 4
Gasoline\Service Station with Convenience Market (6K
Sq Ft)945 16 Vehicle Fueling Positions
Adjacent -
Equation 5532 253 253 215 215
5,662 256 259 221 219
--
-- 0 0 0 -2
-- 0 0 -2 -1
-- 0 0 -2 -3
-- 253 253 215 213
-- 3 6 4 3
-- 256 259 219 216
-- -192 -192 -161 -161
-- -192 -192 -161 -161
-- 64 67 58 55
-- 157 157 120 120
-- 157 157 120 120
106 106 117 117
Total Pass-by Reduction
(4) Pass-by permitted by Congestion Management guidelines for 10th Edition
Pass-by permitted at 10% of Total Adjacent Volume
ITE Trip Generation
Bayat Mixed Use, Wilmington, NC
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes
Unadjusted Trips
Internal Capture Overall %(1),(2)0.0%1.1%
Internal Capture: Retail Trips Reduction
Internal Capture: Residential Trips Reduction
Total Internal Trips Reduction
Retail
Residential
Total External Full Build Trips
Pass-By (LU 945) AM @62%, PM @ 56 % (4)
Total Adjusted (Primary) Trips
(1) Per NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool (See worksheets for more information)(2) Internal Capture less than 10% of Full Build Unadjusted Trips
(3) Pass-by permitted by 11th Edition methodology
Pass-By (LU 945) AM @ 76%, PM @ 75 % (3)
Total Pass-by Reduction
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Size
Max passby allowed
Total AM trips 96 - 48 Entry, 48 Exiting
Total PM trips 130 - 65 Entry, 65 Exiting
These passby trips
should be capped
at 10% of adjacent
street traffic.
Based on the
existing counts,
the peak hour
traffic during AM is
952 and PM is
1290
Are these the
proposed pass-by
trips?
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 48
*** NOT TO SCALE ***This document,together with the concepts and designs
presented herein,is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared.Reuse of,or improper
reliance on,this document by others without written
authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of
the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
BAYAT LAND MYRTGRV
DEVELOPMENT
WILMNGTO, NC
FIGURE 5
NEW TRIP
DISTRIBUTION
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
45
%
I
N
10% IN
10
%
O
U
T
45
%
O
U
T
45
%
I
N
55
%
O
U
T
45
%
O
U
T
45
%
O
U
T
45
%
I
N
45
%
I
N
55% OUT
Site Drive 1
10
0
%
I
N
100% OUT
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
ROADWAY
LEGEND
ORIGIN/DESTINATION
NODE
10%
45%
100%
%
45%
30%
60%
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 49
*** NOT TO SCALE ***This document,together with the concepts and designs
presented herein,is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared.Reuse of,or improper
reliance on,this document by others without written
authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be
without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of
the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client.
PROJECT NUMBER 220201
BAYAT LAND MYRTGRV
DEVELOPMENT
WILMNGTO, NC
FIGURE 6
PASS-BY SITE
DISTRIBUTION
SR 1492
(Myrtle Grove Road)
Hill Valley Walk
SR 2364
(Southern Charm Drive)
US 421
(Carolina Beach Road)
10
%
I
N
10
%
O
U
T
10% OUT
Site Drive 1
-90
%
I
N
10
0
%
I
N
100% OUT
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
BLACK = EXISTING
BLUE = PROPOSED
ROADWAY
LEGEND
ORIGIN/DESTINATION
NODE%
10
0
%
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 50
Future No Build Synchro Review
TIA Name and date: Bayat Mixed Use
Reviewer: KK
Date Reviewed: 9/9/22
Check parameters of study against the approved TIA Scope and Congestion Management guidelines. Use
Blue ink for items that check off and Red ink for items that potentially need correction/revision or
determine the TIA to be invalid and a resubmittal necessary.
Intersections
Intersection 1: Carolina Beach Road at Myrtle Grove Road
Lane Settings
• Are all entered volumes a minimum of 4 vph? (There should be no values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for the
most accurate calculations)
o Yes
• Is the model showing the correct lane configuration at each approach?
o Yes
• If entered, is the grade correct for each approach?
o Yes
• Are the correct number of storage lanes entered and are they the correct lengths?
o Yes
• Is the right turn set to channelized where necessary?
o Yes
• Is Right Turn on Red (RTOR) used?
Eliminate all RTOR phasing (existing and future). Congestion Management guidelines state “do not
analyze right turn on red at any proposed intersection approaches to ensure that adequate storage
is provided.”
o Yes
Timing Settings
• Are the turn types correct and associated with the correct phases?
Eliminate all PT+PM left-turn phasing in future conditions. Congestion Management guidelines
state that analysis of Protected-only phasing in future conditions will identify required storage in the
event that Protected-only phasing is necessary.
Existing Permissive left-turn phasing should remain Permissive in future conditions, except where
Protected-only phasing is being analyzed as an improvement to the intersection in Future +
Improvement condition.
o Yes
• Is the lost time greater than or equal to 5 seconds?
o Yes
• Check for Recall Mode on Signalized Intersection.
If simulating ‘free run’ operation (actuated-uncoordinated), use Min Recall on main street phase.
If simulating ‘Coordinated Mode’ (Actuated-Coordinate), use C-Max.”
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 51
o Uncrd-Min recal
Phasing Settings
• Is the control type correct?
o Yes
• Is the cycle length correct?
o Yes
• Is the offset correct?
o N/A
• Check “Referenced to” and “Reference Phase.”
o N?A
• Check the times for minimum initial, maximum split, yellow time, all-red time, vehicle extension,
minimum gap, time before reduce, time to reduce, walk time, and flash don’t walk.
Yellow times should either match the signal plans or be entered as a default of Y=5 s.
All-Red times should either match the signal plans or be entered as a default of R=2 s.
o Yes
• Are the correct phases marked as pedestrian phases?
o N/A
Detector Settings
• Do the size and distance from the stop bar match the included signal plans?
o Yes
• Are the leading and trailing detectors correct?
o Yes
• Is the detector type correct?
o Yes
• Are the detector channels, extend, and queue correct?
o Yes
• Are the detector delays correct?
o Yes
Roads
1. Road 1: Carolina Beach Road
• Is the speed limit correct?
o Yes
• If this road is a Y line, is it at least 1000 feet?
o Yes
2. Road 1: Myrtle Grove Road
• Is the speed limit correct?
o Yes
• If this road is a Y line, is it at least 1000 feet?
o Yes
Intersection 1: Carolina Beach Road at Southern Charm Drive (Remodel the intersection)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 52
Lane Settings
• Are all entered volumes a minimum of 4 vph? (There should be no values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for the
most accurate calculations)
o Yes
• Is the model showing the correct lane configuration at each approach?
o Yes
• If entered, is the grade correct for each approach?
o Not entered
• Are the correct number of storage lanes entered and are they the correct lengths?
o Yes
• Is the right turn set to channelized where necessary?
o N/A
• Is Right Turn on Red (RTOR) used?
Eliminate all RTOR phasing (existing and future). Congestion Management guidelines state “do not
analyze right turn on red at any proposed intersection approaches to ensure that adequate storage
is provided.”
o N/A
Roads
3. Road 1: Southern Charm Road
• Is the speed limit correct?
o Yes
• If this road is a Y line, is it at least 1000 feet?
o Yes
Intersection 1: Carolina Beach Road at Hill Valley Walk (Remodel the intersection)
Lane Settings
• Are all entered volumes a minimum of 4 vph? (There should be no values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for the
most accurate calculations)
o Yes
• Is the model showing the correct lane configuration at each approach?
o Yes
• If entered, is the grade correct for each approach?
o Not entered
• Are the correct number of storage lanes entered and are they the correct lengths?
o Yes
• Is the right turn set to channelized where necessary?
o N/A
• Is Right Turn on Red (RTOR) used?
Eliminate all RTOR phasing (existing and future). Congestion Management guidelines state “do not
analyze right turn on red at any proposed intersection approaches to ensure that adequate storage
is provided.”
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 53
o N/A
Roads
4. Road 1: Hill Valley Walk
• Is the speed limit correct?
o Yes
• If this road is a Y line, is it at least 1000 feet?
o Yes
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 54
Level of Service Analysis
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 55
Existing Conditions
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 56
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 137 87 4 1152 50 88 813
Future Volume (vph) 137 87 4 1152 50 88 813
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.316 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 589 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 381 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 4.7 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)152 97 4 1280 56 98 903
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 97 4 1280 56 98 903
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)11.1 20.2 20.2 10.4 20.2
Total Split (s)26.1 66.2 66.2 20.4 86.6
Total Split (%)23.2% 58.7% 58.7% 18.1% 76.8%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 60.0 60.0 15.0 80.4
Yellow Time (s)3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2
All-Red Time (s)3.1 1.0 1.0 2.4 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.2 -1.2 -0.4 -1.2
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0
Minimum Gap (s)1.0 3.4 3.4 2.0 3.4
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 15.0
Time To Reduce (s)0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)11.2 69.6 36.3 36.3 69.6 9.3 47.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 1.00 0.52 0.52 1.00 0.13 0.69
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.06 0.01 0.69 0.04 0.42 0.37
Control Delay 37.1 0.1 11.0 16.7 0.0 37.4 5.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.1 0.1 11.0 16.7 0.0 37.4 5.1
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 57
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
LOS DABBADA
Approach Delay 22.7 15.9 8.3
Approach LOS C B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 58 0 1 212 0 37 66
Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 0 7 380 0 105 125
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 301 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 566 1583 512 3074 1583 413 3427
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.06 0.01 0.42 0.04 0.24 0.26
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 112.7
Actuated Cycle Length: 69.6
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.8%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 58
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)000041915
Future Volume (vph)000041915
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0000461017
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)0000461017
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 59
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)36 5000401163 4000
Future Volume (vph)36 5000401163 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.958
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1785 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.958
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1785 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)40 6000401292 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 46 000401296 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 60
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 36 5000401163 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 36 5000401163 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 40 6000401292 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 646 1296 - - - 648 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 646 1296 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 357 161 0 0 0 413 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 427 231 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 353 161 - - - 413 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 353 161 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 422 231 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 18.7 13.8 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 308 413
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.148 0.011
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 18.7 13.8
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 61
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00474000009114
Future Volume (vph)00474000009114
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.968
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1803 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.968
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1803 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00484000001012 4
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)004012000001012 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 62
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0474000009114
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0474000009114
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0484000001012 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 506 506 1016 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 506 1016 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 512 449 236 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 517 314 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 512 445 236 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 445 236 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 513 314 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 16.1 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)512 337 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.036 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 16.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 63
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 11 1167 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 11 1167 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 12 1297 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 12 1297 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 64
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1203 0 0 0 954
Future Volume (vph)0 1203 0 0 0 954
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)340 206 381
Travel Time (s)4.2 2.6 4.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1337 0 0 0 1060
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1337 0 0 0 1060
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 65
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 225 25 4 940 134 121 1057
Future Volume (vph) 225 25 4 940 134 121 1057
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.241 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 449 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 381 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 4.7 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)250 28 4 1044 149 134 1174
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 250 28 4 1044 149 134 1174
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)11.1 20.2 20.2 10.4 20.2
Total Split (s)26.1 66.2 66.2 20.4 86.6
Total Split (%)23.2% 58.7% 58.7% 18.1% 76.8%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 60.0 60.0 15.0 80.4
Yellow Time (s)3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2
All-Red Time (s)3.1 1.0 1.0 2.4 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.2 -1.2 -0.4 -1.2
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0
Minimum Gap (s)1.0 3.4 3.4 2.0 3.4
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 15.0
Time To Reduce (s)0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)15.0 69.9 28.8 28.8 69.9 10.4 44.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 1.00 0.41 0.41 1.00 0.15 0.64
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.02 0.02 0.72 0.09 0.51 0.52
Control Delay 35.8 0.0 14.8 21.1 0.1 37.5 8.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.8 0.0 14.8 21.1 0.1 37.5 8.1
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 66
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
LOS DABCADA
Approach Delay 32.2 18.4 11.1
Approach LOS C B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 97 0 1 187 0 53 123
Queue Length 95th (ft) 207 0 8 318 0 126 207
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 301 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 556 1583 390 3073 1583 405 3471
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.45 0.02 0.01 0.34 0.09 0.33 0.34
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 112.7
Actuated Cycle Length: 69.9
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.9%ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 67
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0000371253
Future Volume (vph)0000371253
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0000411392
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)0000411392
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 68
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)32 5000401040 4000
Future Volume (vph)32 5000401040 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.999
Flt Protected 0.959
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1786 0 0 0 1611 0 3536 0000
Flt Permitted 0.959
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1786 0 0 0 1611 0 3536 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)36 6000401156 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 42 000401160 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.5%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 69
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 5000401040 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 32 5000401040 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 36 6000401156 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 578 1160 - - - 580 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 578 1160 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 399 194 0 0 0 458 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 468 268 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 395 194 - - - 458 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 395 194 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 463 268 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.8 12.9 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 346 458
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.119 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.8 12.9
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 70
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 7 14 4000001232 21
Future Volume (vph)0 0 7 14 4000001232 21
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.962
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1792 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.962
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1792 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 8 16 4000001369 23
Shared Lane Traffic (%)10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)017020000001369 23
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 71
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 7 14 4000001232 21
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 7 14 4000001232 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 8 16 4000001369 23
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 685 685 1392 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 685 1392 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 391 334 141 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 404 207 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 391 327 141 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 327 141 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 396 207 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 20.4 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)391 253 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.079 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 20.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 72
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 18 1044 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 18 1044 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 20 1160 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 20 1160 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 73
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1076 0 0 0 1286
Future Volume (vph)0 1076 0 0 0 1286
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)340 206 381
Travel Time (s)4.2 2.6 4.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1196 0 0 0 1429
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1196 0 0 0 1429
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.0%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 74
Future No Build Conditions
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 75
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 142 90 4 1187 52 91 838
Future Volume (vph) 142 90 4 1187 52 91 838
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.307 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 572 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 381 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 4.7 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)158 100 4 1319 58 101 931
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 158 100 4 1319 58 101 931
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)11.1 20.2 20.2 10.4 20.2
Total Split (s)26.1 66.2 66.2 20.4 86.6
Total Split (%)23.2% 58.7% 58.7% 18.1% 76.8%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 60.0 60.0 15.0 80.4
Yellow Time (s)3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2
All-Red Time (s)3.1 1.0 1.0 2.4 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.2 -1.2 -0.4 -1.2
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0
Minimum Gap (s)1.0 3.4 3.4 2.0 3.4
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 15.0
Time To Reduce (s)0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)11.8 71.9 37.7 37.7 71.9 9.6 49.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 1.00 0.52 0.52 1.00 0.13 0.69
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.06 0.01 0.71 0.04 0.43 0.38
Control Delay 38.6 0.1 11.2 17.3 0.0 39.2 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 38.6 0.1 11.2 17.3 0.0 39.2 5.3
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 76
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
LOS DABBADA
Approach Delay 23.6 16.5 8.6
Approach LOS C B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 0 1 227 0 40 71
Queue Length 95th (ft) 158 0 7 411 0 112 135
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 301 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 555 1583 485 3002 1583 404 3396
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.06 0.01 0.44 0.04 0.25 0.27
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 112.7
Actuated Cycle Length: 71.9
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 77
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)000044943
Future Volume (vph)000044943
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0000491048
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)0000491048
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 78
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)38 6000401199 4000
Future Volume (vph)38 6000401199 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.959
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1786 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.959
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1786 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)42 7000401332 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 49 000401336 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.9%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 79
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 6000401199 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 38 6000401199 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 42 7000401332 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 666 1336 - - - 668 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 666 1336 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 345 152 0 0 0 401 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 415 221 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 341 152 - - - 401 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 341 152 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 410 221 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 19.8 14.1 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 292 401
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.167 0.011
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19.8 14.1
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 80
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00485000009395
Future Volume (vph)00485000009395
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00496000001043 6
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)004015000001043 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 81
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0485000009395
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0485000009395
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0496000001043 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 522 522 1049 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 522 1049 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 499 438 226 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 506 303 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 499 434 226 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 434 226 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 501 303 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 16.7 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)499 321 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.045 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 16.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 82
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 12 1203 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 12 1203 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 13 1337 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 1337 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 83
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1243 0 0 0 984
Future Volume (vph)0 1243 0 0 0 984
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)340 206 381
Travel Time (s)4.2 2.6 4.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1381 0 0 0 1093
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1381 0 0 0 1093
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 84
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 232 26 4 969 139 125 1090
Future Volume (vph) 232 26 4 969 139 125 1090
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.232 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 432 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 381 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 4.7 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)258 29 4 1077 154 139 1211
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 258 29 4 1077 154 139 1211
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)11.1 20.2 20.2 10.4 20.2
Total Split (s)26.1 66.2 66.2 20.4 86.6
Total Split (%)23.2% 58.7% 58.7% 18.1% 76.8%
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 60.0 60.0 15.0 80.4
Yellow Time (s)3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2
All-Red Time (s)3.1 1.0 1.0 2.4 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.1 -1.2 -1.2 -0.4 -1.2
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 6.0
Minimum Gap (s)1.0 3.4 3.4 2.0 3.4
Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 15.0
Time To Reduce (s)0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)15.6 71.8 29.9 29.9 71.8 10.7 45.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 1.00 0.42 0.42 1.00 0.15 0.64
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.02 0.02 0.73 0.10 0.53 0.54
Control Delay 37.0 0.0 14.8 21.7 0.1 38.9 8.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.0 0.0 14.8 21.7 0.1 38.9 8.4
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 85
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
LOS DABCADA
Approach Delay 33.3 18.9 11.5
Approach LOS C B B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 0 1 202 0 57 134
Queue Length 95th (ft) 218 0 8 331 0 132 216
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 301 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 540 1583 367 3012 1583 394 3462
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.02 0.01 0.36 0.10 0.35 0.35
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 112.7
Actuated Cycle Length: 71.8
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2%ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 86
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0000391291
Future Volume (vph)0000391291
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0000431434
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)0000431434
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 87
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)33 6000401072 4000
Future Volume (vph)33 6000401072 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.999
Flt Protected 0.960
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1788 0 0 0 1611 0 3536 0000
Flt Permitted 0.960
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1788 0 0 0 1611 0 3536 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)37 7000401191 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 000401195 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 88
HCM 2010 TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 33 6000401072 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 33 6000401072 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 37 7000401191 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 596 1195 - - - 598 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 596 1195 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 387 185 0 0 0 445 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 457 258 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 383 185 - - - 445 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 383 185 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 452 258 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 17.6 13.2 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 329 445
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.132 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.6 13.2
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 89
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001270 22
Future Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001270 22
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.964
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.964
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 9 17 6000001411 24
Shared Lane Traffic (%)10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)018023000001411 24
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 90
HCM 2010 TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001270 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001270 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 -----0-
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 9 17 6000001411 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 706 706 1435 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 706 1435 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 378 323 133 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 393 197 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 378 315 133 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 315 133 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 384 197 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.8 21.9 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)378 235 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.095 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.8 21.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 91
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 19 1076 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 19 1076 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 21 1196 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 1196 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 92
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)000000
Future Volume (vph)000000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 3278 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 3278 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)340 206 381
Travel Time (s)4.2 2.6 4.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)000000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)000000
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.3%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 93
Future Build Conditions
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 94
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 163 90 63 1314 73 91 963
Future Volume (vph) 163 90 63 1314 73 91 963
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.267 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 497 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 290 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 3.6 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)181 100 70 1460 81 101 1070
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 181 100 70 1460 81 101 1070
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)13.1 21.0 21.0 12.4 21.0
Total Split (s)28.0 73.0 73.0 19.0 92.0
Total Split (%)23.3% 60.8% 60.8% 15.8% 76.7%
Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)15.2 84.8 46.0 46.0 84.8 11.6 58.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 1.00 0.54 0.54 1.00 0.14 0.69
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.06 0.26 0.76 0.05 0.42 0.44
Control Delay 44.2 0.1 15.9 19.7 0.1 46.2 6.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.2 0.1 15.9 19.7 0.1 46.2 6.2
LOS DABBADA
Approach Delay 28.5 18.6 9.7
Approach LOS C B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 0 20 321 0 50 105
Queue Length 95th (ft) 200 0 57 506 0 131 185
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 95
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 210 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 527 1583 396 2824 1583 321 3261
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.06 0.18 0.52 0.05 0.31 0.33
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 84.8
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 96
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00001921006
Future Volume (vph)00001921006
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00002131118
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)00002131118
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 97
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 186 6000401261 4000
Future Volume (vph) 186 6000401261 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.954
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.954
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)207 7000401401 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 214 000401405 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 98
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 6000401261 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 186 6000401261 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 16979 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 207 7000401401 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 701 1405 - - - 703 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 701 1405 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 138 0 0 0 380 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 395 204 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 321 138 - - - 380 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 321 138 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 390 204 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 39.3 14.6 0
HCM LOS E B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 308 380
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.693 0.012
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 39.3 14.6
HCM Lane LOS - - E B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.8 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 99
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00485000001002 5
Future Volume (vph)00485000001002 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00496000001113 6
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)004015000001113 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 100
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0485000001002 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0485000001002 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 16974 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0496000001113 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 557 557 1119 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 557 1119 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 474 413 205 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 482 280 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 474 409 205 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 409 205 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 477 280 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.7 17.8 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)474 296 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.049 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 17.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 101
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 12 1265 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 12 1265 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 13 1406 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 1406 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 102
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 259 0 0 935 256
Future Volume (vph)0 259 0 0 935 256
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95
Frt 0.865 0.968
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1611 0 0 3426 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1611 0 0 3426 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1217 537 296
Travel Time (s)23.7 6.7 3.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 288 0 0 1039 284
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 288 0 0 1323 0
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 103
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 259 0 0 935 256
Future Vol, veh/h 0 259 0 0 935 256
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 16974 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 288 0 0 1039 284
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 662 - 0
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 404 - -
Stage 1 0 -- -
Stage 2 0 -- -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 404 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Approach EB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 33.1 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)404 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.712 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 33.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.4 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 104
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1451 0 0 0 1192
Future Volume (vph)0 1451 0 0 0 1192
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)430 296 290
Travel Time (s)5.3 3.7 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1612 0 0 0 1324
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1612 0 0 0 1324
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 105
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 247 26 49 1060 154 125 1182
Future Volume (vph) 247 26 49 1060 154 125 1182
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 100 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.209 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 389 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 260 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 3.2 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)274 29 54 1178 171 139 1313
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 29 54 1178 171 139 1313
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)13.1 21.0 21.0 12.4 21.0
Total Split (s)35.0 62.0 62.0 23.0 85.0
Total Split (%)29.2% 51.7% 51.7% 19.2% 70.8%
Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)19.7 86.9 37.9 37.9 86.9 13.5 56.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 1.00 0.44 0.44 1.00 0.16 0.65
v/c Ratio 0.69 0.02 0.32 0.76 0.11 0.51 0.57
Control Delay 42.5 0.0 24.4 25.2 0.1 44.9 9.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.5 0.0 24.4 25.2 0.1 44.9 9.8
LOS D A C C A D A
Approach Delay 38.4 22.1 13.2
Approach LOS D C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 0 18 272 0 69 180
Queue Length 95th (ft) 276 0 60 450 0 164 315
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 106
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 180 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)100 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 646 1583 269 2454 1583 387 3129
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.02 0.20 0.48 0.11 0.36 0.42
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.9
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 107
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00001451336
Future Volume (vph)00001451336
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00001611484
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)00001611484
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 108
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 139 6000401118 4000
Future Volume (vph) 139 6000401118 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.954
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.954
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)154 7000401242 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 161 000401246 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 109
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 139 6000401118 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 139 6000401118 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 16979 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 154 7000401242 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 621 1246 - - - 623 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 621 1246 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 372 172 0 0 0 429 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 442 244 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 368 172 - - - 429 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 368 172 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 437 244 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.7 13.5 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 351 429
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.459 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 23.7 13.5
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.3 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 110
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Future Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.964
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.964
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 9 17 6000001461 24
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)009023000001461 24
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 111
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 16974 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 9 17 6000001461 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 731 731 1485 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 731 1485 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 364 310 124 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 379 187 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 364 303 124 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 303 124 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 370 187 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.1 22.9 0
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)364 223 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.1 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.1 22.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS C C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 112
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 19 1122 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 19 1122 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 21 1247 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 1247 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 113
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 216 0 0 1265 219
Future Volume (vph)0 216 0 0 1265 219
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95
Frt 0.865 0.978
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1611 0 0 3461 0
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1611 0 0 3461 0
Link Speed (mph) 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1217 537 325
Travel Time (s)23.7 6.7 4.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 240 0 0 1406 243
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 0 0 1649 0
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 114
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 216 0 0 1265 219
Future Vol, veh/h 0 216 0 0 1265 219
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 ----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 16974 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 240 0 0 1406 243
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 825 - 0
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 316 - -
Stage 1 0 -- -
Stage 2 0 -- -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 316 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Approach EB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 44.9 0
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)316 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.759 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 44.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS E - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.9 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 115
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1262 0 0 0 1481
Future Volume (vph)0 1262 0 0 0 1481
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)460 325 260
Travel Time (s)5.7 4.0 3.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1402 0 0 0 1646
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1402 0 0 0 1646
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.5%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 116
Future Build Conditions
with Improvements
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 117
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 163 90 63 1314 73 91 963
Future Volume (vph) 163 90 63 1314 73 91 963
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 200 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.267 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 497 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 290 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 3.6 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)181 100 70 1460 81 101 1070
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 181 100 70 1460 81 101 1070
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)13.1 21.0 21.0 12.4 21.0
Total Split (s)28.0 73.0 73.0 19.0 92.0
Total Split (%)23.3% 60.8% 60.8% 15.8% 76.7%
Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)15.2 84.8 46.0 46.0 84.8 11.6 58.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 1.00 0.54 0.54 1.00 0.14 0.69
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.06 0.26 0.76 0.05 0.42 0.44
Control Delay 44.2 0.1 15.9 19.7 0.1 46.2 6.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.2 0.1 15.9 19.7 0.1 46.2 6.2
LOS DABBADA
Approach Delay 28.5 18.6 9.7
Approach LOS C B A
Queue Length 50th (ft) 91 0 20 321 0 50 105
Queue Length 95th (ft) 200 0 57 506 0 131 185
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 118
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 210 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)200 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 527 1583 396 2824 1583 321 3261
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.06 0.18 0.52 0.05 0.31 0.33
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 84.8
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 119
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00001921006
Future Volume (vph)00001921006
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00002131118
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)00002131118
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 120
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 186 6000401261 4000
Future Volume (vph) 186 6000401261 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.954
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.954
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)207 7000401401 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 214 000401405 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9%ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 121
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 186 6000401261 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 186 6000401261 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 16979 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 207 7000401401 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 701 1405 - - - 703 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 701 1405 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 138 0 0 0 380 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 395 204 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 321 138 - - - 380 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 321 138 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 390 204 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 39.3 14.6 0
HCM LOS E B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 308 380
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.693 0.012
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 39.3 14.6
HCM Lane LOS - - E B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 4.8 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 122
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00485000001002 5
Future Volume (vph)00485000001002 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.971
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1809 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00496000001113 6
Shared Lane Traffic (%) 10%
Lane Group Flow (vph)004015000001113 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 123
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0485000001002 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0485000001002 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 16974 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0496000001113 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 557 557 1119 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 557 1119 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 474 413 205 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 482 280 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 474 409 205 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 409 205 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 477 280 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.7 17.8 0
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)474 296 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.049 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 17.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 124
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 12 1265 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 12 1265 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 13 1406 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 13 1406 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 125
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 259 0 0 935 256
Future Volume (vph)0 259 0 0 935 256
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 200
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 0 3539 1583
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 0 3539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1217 537 296
Travel Time (s)23.7 6.7 3.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 288 0 0 1039 284
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 288 0 0 1039 284
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 126
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 259 0 0 935 256
Future Vol, veh/h 0 259 0 0 935 256
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - 200
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 16974 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 288 0 0 1039 284
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 520 - 0
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 501 - -
Stage 1 0 -- -
Stage 2 0 -- -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 501 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Approach EB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 21.4 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)501 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.574 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 21.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.6 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 127
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1451 0 0 0 1192
Future Volume (vph)0 1451 0 0 0 1192
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)430 296 290
Travel Time (s)5.3 3.7 3.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1612 0 0 0 1324
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1612 0 0 0 1324
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 128
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 247 26 49 1060 154 125 1182
Future Volume (vph) 247 26 49 1060 154 125 1182
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 200 125 150
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.209 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 389 3539 1583 1770 3539
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)45 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1589 260 2446
Travel Time (s)24.1 3.2 30.3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)274 29 54 1178 171 139 1313
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 29 54 1178 171 139 1313
Turn Type Prot Free Perm NA Free Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 2 Free
Detector Phase 4 2 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)5.0 14.0 14.0 5.0 14.0
Minimum Split (s)13.1 21.0 21.0 12.4 21.0
Total Split (s)35.0 62.0 62.0 23.0 85.0
Total Split (%)29.2% 51.7% 51.7% 19.2% 70.8%
Yellow Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
All-Red Time (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None Min Min None Min
Act Effct Green (s)19.7 86.9 37.9 37.9 86.9 13.5 56.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 1.00 0.44 0.44 1.00 0.16 0.65
v/c Ratio 0.69 0.02 0.32 0.76 0.11 0.51 0.57
Control Delay 42.5 0.0 24.4 25.2 0.1 44.9 9.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 42.5 0.0 24.4 25.2 0.1 44.9 9.8
LOS D A C C A D A
Approach Delay 38.4 22.1 13.2
Approach LOS D C B
Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 0 18 272 0 69 180
Queue Length 95th (ft) 276 0 60 450 0 164 315
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 129
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1509 180 2366
Turn Bay Length (ft)200 125 150
Base Capacity (vph) 646 1583 269 2454 1583 387 3129
Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.02 0.20 0.48 0.11 0.36 0.42
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.9
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.6 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 130
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
2: Carolina Beach Road 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)00001451336
Future Volume (vph)00001451336
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 425
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)00001770 5085
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)00001770 5085
Link Speed (mph)10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 137 537
Travel Time (s)8.8 1.7 6.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)00001611484
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)00001611484
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 131
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 139 6000401118 4000
Future Volume (vph) 139 6000401118 4000
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.865
Flt Protected 0.954
Satd. Flow (prot)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Flt Permitted 0.954
Satd. Flow (perm)0 1777 0 0 0 1611 0 3539 0000
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)129 1166 124 433
Travel Time (s)2.5 22.7 1.5 5.4
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)154 7000401242 4000
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 161 000401246 0000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 132
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 139 6000401118 4 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 139 6000401118 4 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length -----0------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 16979 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 154 7000401242 4 0 0 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 621 1246 - - - 623 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 -------
Stage 2 621 1246 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 - - - 6.94 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 - - - 3.32 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 372 172 0 0 0 429 0 - -
Stage 1 - - 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Stage 2 442 244 0 0 0 - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 368 172 - - - 429 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 368 172 -------
Stage 1 ---------
Stage 2 437 244 -------
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.7 13.5 0
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 351 429
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.459 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 23.7 13.5
HCM Lane LOS - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.3 0
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 133
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Future Volume (vph)0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 0 600 0 550 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100 100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.964
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.964
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1611 0 1796 000003539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 10 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1241 123 2634 137
Travel Time (s)24.2 8.4 32.7 1.7
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 9 17 6000001461 24
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)009023000001461 24
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 134
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 15 5000001315 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 --------0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 16974 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 0 9 17 6000001461 24
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - - 731 731 1485 -- - 0
Stage 1 - - - 0 0 -- - -
Stage 2 - - - 731 1485 -- - -
Critical Hdwy - - 6.94 7.54 6.54 -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.32 3.52 4.02 -- - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 364 310 124 0 0 - -
Stage 1 0 0 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - 379 187 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 364 303 124 -- - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 303 124 -- - -
Stage 1 ------ ---
Stage 2 - - - 370 187 - - - -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.1 22.9 0
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)364 223 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.1 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.1 22.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS C C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 135
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
5: Carolina Beach Road 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 0 19 1122 0 0
Future Volume (vph)0 0 19 1122 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 425 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Frt
Flt Protected 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Flt Permitted 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm)0 0 1770 3539 0 0
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)123 2642 124
Travel Time (s)2.4 32.8 1.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 21 1247 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 21 1247 0 0
Sign Control Stop Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 136
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 216 0 0 1265 219
Future Volume (vph)0 216 0 0 1265 219
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft)0 0 0 200
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)100 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 0 3539 1583
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 0 3539 1583
Link Speed (mph)35 55 55
Link Distance (ft)1217 537 325
Travel Time (s)23.7 6.7 4.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 240 0 0 1406 243
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 0 0 1406 243
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 137
HCM 6th TWSC Myrtle Grove
6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 216 0 0 1265 219
Future Vol, veh/h 0 216 0 0 1265 219
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - 0 - - - 200
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 16974 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 0 240 0 0 1406 243
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All - 703 - 0
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Critical Hdwy - 6.94 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -
Follow-up Hdwy - 3.32 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 380 - -
Stage 1 0 -- -
Stage 2 0 -- -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 380 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -
Stage 1 - -- -
Stage 2 - -- -
Approach EB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 29.4 0
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)380 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.632 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 29.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.2 - -
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 138
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Myrtle Grove
14: Carolina Beach Road 8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM Synchro 10 Report
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)0 1262 0 0 0 1481
Future Volume (vph)0 1262 0 0 0 1481
Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)0 2787 0 0 0 3539
Link Speed (mph) 55 55 55
Link Distance (ft)460 325 260
Travel Time (s)5.7 4.0 3.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)0 1402 0 0 0 1646
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1402 0 0 0 1646
Sign Control Free Stop Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.5%ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 139
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 140
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 118 70 48 274 264 93 102 85 93
Average Queue (ft) 56 5 4 124 129 3 51 38 36
95th Queue (ft)99 36 28 211 213 45 90 74 76
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 333 333 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)12 7
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 4
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)57 20
Average Queue (ft)22 2
95th Queue (ft)47 13
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 141
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
1 - 2022 Existing AM
1 - 2022 Existing AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)25 42
Average Queue (ft)3 10
95th Queue (ft)16 34
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB
Directions Served R R
Maximum Queue (ft)20 29
Average Queue (ft)1 1
95th Queue (ft)11 16
Link Distance (ft)296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 142
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 187 11 31 231 227 101 144 147 128
Average Queue (ft) 97 0 3 120 125 6 69 63 57
95th Queue (ft)161 8 19 192 193 63 118 115 104
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 333 333 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)11 6 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 8 1 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)55 20
Average Queue (ft)20 2
95th Queue (ft)46 13
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 143
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
02 - 2022 Existing PM
02 - 2022 Existing PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)24 45
Average Queue (ft)4 14
95th Queue (ft)19 41
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)6
Average Queue (ft) 0
95th Queue (ft)6
Link Distance (ft) 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 10
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 144
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 66 31 272 260 135 119 86 89
Average Queue (ft) 59 5 3 135 140 7 54 38 37
95th Queue (ft)108 36 18 226 231 73 97 72 76
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 333 333 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)14 9 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 5 0 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB NB
Directions Served LT R TR
Maximum Queue (ft)60 20 4
Average Queue (ft)26 2 0
95th Queue (ft)52 13 3
Link Distance (ft)82 1116 53
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 145
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM
3 - 2025 NoBuild AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)24 35
Average Queue (ft)3 11
95th Queue (ft)17 35
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB
Directions Served R R
Maximum Queue (ft)28 10
Average Queue (ft)1 0
95th Queue (ft)16 10
Link Distance (ft)296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 146
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 198 6 28 236 254 161 150 142 144
Average Queue (ft) 98 0 3 127 132 8 74 63 62
95th Queue (ft)161 5 19 204 214 74 125 113 116
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 333 333 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)13 8 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 11 3 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)60 20
Average Queue (ft)22 2
95th Queue (ft)50 12
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 147
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM
04 - 2025 NoBuild PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)29 46
Average Queue (ft)6 14
95th Queue (ft)24 41
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB
Directions Served R R
Maximum Queue (ft)8 22
Average Queue (ft) 0 1
95th Queue (ft)9 13
Link Distance (ft) 296 296
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 148
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 145 92 198 259 271 225 110 123 121
Average Queue (ft) 73 12 68 193 200 26 53 55 54
95th Queue (ft)125 55 177 283 287 144 97 99 101
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 242 242 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)5 6 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)35 42 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 31 26 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)2 20 19 0 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement SB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft)87
Average Queue (ft)10
95th Queue (ft)56
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 425
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 144 21
Average Queue (ft) 81 2
95th Queue (ft)141 12
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 20
Queuing Penalty (veh) 38
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 149
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)22 41
Average Queue (ft)3 12
95th Queue (ft)17 37
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 132 11
Average Queue (ft) 61 0
95th Queue (ft)110 7
Link Distance (ft)1167 247
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 150
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
5 - 2025 Build AM
5 - 2025 Build AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB B11 B11
Directions Served R R T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 211 219 12 16
Average Queue (ft) 38 48 1 1
95th Queue (ft)167 184 17 21
Link Distance (ft)386 386 383 383
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 7
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 169
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 151
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 235 15 172 234 241 213 146 171 179
Average Queue (ft) 113 1 48 177 185 52 72 82 83
95th Queue (ft)186 15 128 251 256 201 126 138 142
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 213 213 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0450
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 27 32 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)1 28 22 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)3 14 35 2 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement SB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft)30
Average Queue (ft)2
95th Queue (ft)17
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 425
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 125 21
Average Queue (ft) 57 2
95th Queue (ft)104 13
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 152
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)34 52
Average Queue (ft)6 19
95th Queue (ft)23 47
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access
Movement EB SB SB
Directions Served R T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 154 11 9
Average Queue (ft) 65 1 0
95th Queue (ft)123 9 5
Link Distance (ft)1166 275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 153
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
6 - 2025 Build PM
6 - 2025 Build PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB SB
Directions Served R R T
Maximum Queue (ft) 163 189 5
Average Queue (ft) 25 38 0
95th Queue (ft)104 131 5
Link Distance (ft)416 416 213
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 118
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 154
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 150 95 200 267 266 225 112 118 112
Average Queue (ft) 71 8 53 198 206 43 56 54 51
95th Queue (ft)123 51 140 287 291 188 98 100 96
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 242 242 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0670
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 44 52 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)14 28 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)9 21 0 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement SB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft) 105
Average Queue (ft) 14
95th Queue (ft)63
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 425
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 146 22
Average Queue (ft) 92 3
95th Queue (ft)151 14
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 26
Queuing Penalty (veh) 51
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 155
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)26 41
Average Queue (ft)3 12
95th Queue (ft)16 37
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 168
Average Queue (ft) 72
95th Queue (ft)128
Link Distance (ft)1155
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 156
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM
7 - 2025 Build Imp AM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB B11
Directions Served R R T
Maximum Queue (ft) 243 252 4
Average Queue (ft) 50 58 0
95th Queue (ft)184 196 4
Link Distance (ft)386 386 383
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 177
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 157
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 1: Carolina Beach Road & Myrtle Grove Road
Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L R U T T R L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 229 6 212 236 248 213 151 169 174
Average Queue (ft) 116 0 51 180 187 49 71 81 83
95th Queue (ft)190 8 137 256 260 195 124 142 147
Link Distance (ft)1533 1533 213 213 2406 2406
Upstream Blk Time (%)0680
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 39 48 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 125 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 8 25 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 4 38 2 0
Intersection: 2: Carolina Beach Road
Movement SB
Directions Served L
Maximum Queue (ft)4
Average Queue (ft) 0
95th Queue (ft)3
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 425
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Carolina Beach Road & Hill Valley Walk
Movement EB WB
Directions Served LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 116 22
Average Queue (ft) 53 3
95th Queue (ft)95 15
Link Distance (ft)82 1116
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 158
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 4: Carolina Beach Road & Southern Charm Drive
Movement EB WB
Directions Served R LT
Maximum Queue (ft)29 46
Average Queue (ft)5 16
95th Queue (ft)22 43
Link Distance (ft)1184 82
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 5: Carolina Beach Road
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 6: Carolina Beach Road & Site Access
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R T
Maximum Queue (ft) 160 6
Average Queue (ft) 74 0
95th Queue (ft)135 4
Link Distance (ft)1154 273
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 159
Queuing and Blocking Report Myrtle Grove
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM
8 - 2025 Build Imp PM SimTraffic Report
Intersection: 14: Carolina Beach Road
Movement WB WB SB
Directions Served R R T
Maximum Queue (ft) 182 203 6
Average Queue (ft) 36 47 0
95th Queue (ft)139 157 4
Link Distance (ft)416 416 213
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 136
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 160
Turning Movement Counts
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 161
File Name : SITE 1
Site Code : SITE 1
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 1
US 421 AND MYRTLE GROVE RD.
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: KENNETH JOHNSON
Groups Printed- PV - DUALS - TTST - TWINS
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 AM 8 72 0 0 0 80 5 1 8 0 14 0 158 22 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 274
07:15 AM 15 98 0 0 0 113 18 0 12 0 30 0 153 15 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 311
07:30 AM 15 81 0 0 0 96 16 0 16 0 32 0 190 20 1 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 339
07:45 AM 17 121 0 0 0 138 28 0 30 2 60 0 272 34 1 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 505
Total 55 372 0 0 0 427 67 1 66 2 136 0 773 91 2 0 866 0 0 0 0 0 1429
08:00 AM 27 142 0 0 0 169 32 0 20 0 52 0 318 19 0 0 337 0 0 0 0 0 558
08:15 AM 24 227 0 0 0 251 34 0 14 0 48 0 280 11 0 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 590
08:30 AM 23 188 0 0 0 211 20 0 24 0 44 0 325 8 1 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 589
08:45 AM 14 256 0 0 0 270 51 0 29 0 80 0 229 12 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 0 591
Total 88 813 0 0 0 901 137 0 87 0 224 0 1152 50 1 0 1203 0 0 0 0 0 2328
09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 162
File Name : SITE 1
Site Code : SITE 1
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 2
US 421 AND MYRTLE GROVE RD.
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: KENNETH JOHNSON
Groups Printed- PV - DUALS - TTST - TWINS
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 PM 24 245 0 0 0 269 45 0 16 0 61 0 274 30 1 0 305 0 0 0 0 0 635
04:15 PM 31 313 0 0 0 344 39 0 10 0 49 0 212 39 1 0 252 0 0 0 0 0 645
04:30 PM 29 254 0 0 0 283 49 0 11 0 60 1 223 31 1 1 257 0 0 0 0 0 600
04:45 PM 20 257 0 0 0 277 62 0 7 0 69 0 158 40 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 544
Total 104 1069 0 0 0 1173 195 0 44 0 239 1 867 140 3 1 1012 0 0 0 0 0 2424
05:00 PM 37 291 0 0 0 328 69 0 5 0 74 0 243 27 1 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 673
05:15 PM 28 234 0 0 0 262 42 0 9 0 51 0 213 27 2 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 555
05:30 PM 30 260 0 0 0 290 54 0 7 0 61 1 241 33 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 626
05:45 PM 26 272 0 0 0 298 60 0 4 0 64 0 243 47 0 0 290 0 0 0 0 0 652
Total 121 1057 0 0 0 1178 225 0 25 0 250 1 940 134 3 0 1078 0 0 0 0 0 2506
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 368 3311 0 0 0 3679 624 1 222 2 849 2 3732 415 9 1 4159 0 0 0 0 0 8687
Apprch %10 90 0 0 0 73.5 0.1 26.1 0.2 0 89.7 10 0.2 0 0 0 0 0
Total %4.2 38.1 0 0 0 42.4 7.2 0 2.6 0 9.8 0 43 4.8 0.1 0 47.9 0 0 0 0 0
PV 364 3238 0 0 0 3602 618 1 219 2 840 0 3654 408 9 1 4072 0 0 0 0 0 8514
% PV 98.9 97.8 0 0 0 97.9 99 100 98.6 100 98.9 0 97.9 98.3 100 100 97.9 0 0 0 0 0 98
DUALS 3 58 0 0 0 61 5 0 3 0 8 2 73 7 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 151
% DUALS 0.8 1.8 0 0 0 1.7 0.8 0 1.4 0 0.9 100 2 1.7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1.7
TTST 1 15 0 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 22
% TTST 0.3 0.5 0 0 0 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.3
TWINS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% TWINS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 163
File Name : SITE 1
Site Code : SITE 1
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 3
US 421 AND MYRTLE GROVE RD.
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: KENNETH JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
0
0
0
0
0
Thru
3238
58
15
0
3311
Left
364
3
1
0
368
Peds
0
0
0
0
0
InOut Total
3873 3602 7475
76 61 137
5 16 21
0 0 0
3954 7633 3679
Rig
h
t
21
9
3 0 0
22
2
Th
r
u
1 0 0 0 1
Le
f
t
61
8
5 1 0
62
4
Pe
d
s
2 0 0 0 2
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
77
2
84
0
16
1
2
10
8
18
1
1
2
0
0
0
78
3
16
3
2
84
9
Left
0
2
0
0
2
Thru
3654
73
5
0
3732
Right
408
7
0
0
415
Peds
10
0
0
0
10
Out TotalIn
3856 4072 7928
63 82 145
16 5 21
0 0 0
3935 8094 4159
Le
f
t
0 0 0 0 0
Th
r
u
0 0 0 0 0
Rig
h
t
0 0 0 0 0
Pe
d
s
0 0 0 0 0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
1
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
2/16/2022 06:00 AM
2/16/2022 07:45 PM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 164
File Name : SITE 1
Site Code : SITE 1
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 4
US 421 AND MYRTLE GROVE RD.
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: KENNETH JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 01:00 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 27 142 0 0 0 169 32 0 20 0 52 0 318 19 0 0 337 0 0 0 0 0 558
08:15 AM 24 227 0 0 0 251 34 0 14 0 48 0 280 11 0 0 291 0 0 0 0 0 590
08:30 AM 23 188 0 0 0 211 20 0 24 0 44 0 325 8 1 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 589
08:45 AM 14 256 0 0 0 270 51 0 29 0 80 0 229 12 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 0 591
Total Volume 88 813 0 0 0 901 137 0 87 0 224 0 1152 50 1 0 1203 0 0 0 0 0 2328
% App. Total 9.8 90.2 0 0 0 61.2 0 38.8 0 0 95.8 4.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .815 .794 .000 .000 .000 .834 .672 .000 .750 .000 .700 .000 .886 .658 .250 .000 .892 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .985
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
0
Thru
813
Left
88
Peds
0
InOut Total
1239 901 2140
Ri
g
h
t
87
Th
r
u
0
Le
f
t
13
7
Pe
d
s
0
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
13
8
22
4
36
2
Left
0
Thru
1152
Right
50
Peds
1
Out TotalIn
950 1203 2153
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Rig
h
t
0
Pe
d
s
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
0
0
0
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
Peak Hour Data
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 165
File Name : SITE 1
Site Code : SITE 1
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 5
US 421 AND MYRTLE GROVE RD.
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: KENNETH JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SR. 1492 (MYRTLE
GROVE RD.)
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:15 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 37 291 0 0 0 328 69 0 5 0 74 0 243 27 1 0 271 0 0 0 0 0 673
05:15 PM 28 234 0 0 0 262 42 0 9 0 51 0 213 27 2 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 555
05:30 PM 30 260 0 0 0 290 54 0 7 0 61 1 241 33 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 626
05:45 PM 26 272 0 0 0 298 60 0 4 0 64 0 243 47 0 0 290 0 0 0 0 0 652
Total Volume 121 1057 0 0 0 1178 225 0 25 0 250 1 940 134 3 0 1078 0 0 0 0 0 2506
% App. Total 10.3 89.7 0 0 0 90 0 10 0 0.1 87.2 12.4 0.3 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .818 .908 .000 .000 .000 .898 .815 .000 .694 .000 .845 .250 .967 .713 .375 .000 .929 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .931
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
S
R
.
1
4
9
2
(
M
Y
R
T
L
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
.
)
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
0
Thru
1057
Left
121
Peds
0
InOut Total
965 1178 2143
Rig
h
t
25
Th
r
u
0
Le
f
t
22
5
Pe
d
s
0
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
25
5
25
0
50
5
Left
1
Thru
940
Right
134
Peds
3
Out TotalIn
1282 1078 2360
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Rig
h
t
0
Pe
d
s
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
1
0
1
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
Peak Hour Data
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 166
File Name : SITE 2
Site Code : SITE 2
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 1
US 421 AND HILL VALLEY WALK / SOUTHERN
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: MICHAEL JOHNSON
Groups Printed- PV - DUALS - TTST - TWINS
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
HILL VALLEY WALK
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHERN CHARM RD.
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-
TURNS
Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
06:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 AM 1 70 1 6 0 78 0 0 1 0 1 1 173 0 0 0 174 0 0 1 0 1 254
07:15 AM 0 111 0 5 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 1 0 164 0 0 1 0 1 281
07:30 AM 2 88 0 10 0 100 0 0 1 0 1 1 199 0 1 0 201 0 0 3 0 3 305
07:45 AM 2 145 0 5 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 0 2 0 303 0 0 4 0 4 459
Total 5 414 1 26 0 446 0 0 2 0 2 2 836 0 4 0 842 0 0 9 0 9 1299
08:00 AM 0 165 3 6 0 174 0 0 2 0 2 2 329 0 3 0 334 0 0 2 0 2 512
08:15 AM 2 249 0 12 0 263 0 0 0 0 0 1 279 0 1 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 544
08:30 AM 1 193 0 16 0 210 0 0 1 0 1 1 316 0 0 0 317 0 0 0 0 0 528
08:45 AM 2 304 1 2 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 3 0 242 0 0 1 0 1 552
Total 5 911 4 36 0 956 0 0 3 0 3 4 1163 0 7 0 1174 0 0 3 0 3 2136
09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 167
File Name : SITE 2
Site Code : SITE 2
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 2
US 421 AND HILL VALLEY WALK / SOUTHERN
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: MICHAEL JOHNSON
Groups Printed- PV - DUALS - TTST - TWINS
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
HILL VALLEY WALK
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHERN CHARM RD.
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-
TURNS
Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 PM 3 286 4 1 0 294 0 0 1 0 1 2 302 0 0 2 306 0 0 6 0 6 607
04:15 PM 0 349 2 2 1 354 0 0 1 0 1 2 248 0 0 2 252 0 0 1 0 1 608
04:30 PM 3 295 4 5 0 307 0 0 1 0 1 1 248 0 0 5 254 0 0 0 0 0 562
04:45 PM 1 312 4 3 0 320 0 0 2 0 2 3 193 0 0 2 198 0 0 3 0 3 523
Total 7 1242 14 11 1 1275 0 0 5 0 5 8 991 0 0 11 1010 0 0 10 0 10 2300
05:00 PM 2 353 3 5 0 363 0 0 0 0 0 1 265 0 0 1 267 0 0 2 0 2 632
05:15 PM 3 267 3 8 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 1 232 0 0 3 236 0 0 3 0 3 520
05:30 PM 0 298 6 10 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 2 264 0 0 10 276 0 0 1 0 1 591
05:45 PM 0 314 9 9 0 332 0 0 2 0 2 0 279 0 0 0 279 0 0 1 0 1 614
Total 5 1232 21 32 0 1290 0 0 2 0 2 4 1040 0 0 14 1058 0 0 7 0 7 2357
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 22 3799 40 105 1 3967 0 0 12 0 12 18 4030 0 11 25 4084 0 0 29 0 29 8092
Apprch %0.6 95.8 1 2.6 0 0 0 100 0 0.4 98.7 0 0.3 0.6 0 0 100 0
Total %0.3 46.9 0.5 1.3 0 49 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 49.8 0 0.1 0.3 50.5 0 0 0.4 0 0.4
PV 22 3720 40 105 1 3888 0 0 12 0 12 18 3945 0 11 25 3999 0 0 29 0 29 7928
% PV 100 97.9 100 100 100 98 0 0 100 0 100 100 97.9 0 100 100 97.9 0 0 100 0 100 98
DUALS 0 63 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 143
% DUALS 0 1.7 0 0 0 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1.8
TTST 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 21
% TTST 0 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.3
TWINS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% TWINS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 168
File Name : SITE 2
Site Code : SITE 2
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 3
US 421 AND HILL VALLEY WALK / SOUTHERN
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: MICHAEL JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
C
H
A
R
M
R
D
.
H
I
L
L
V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
L
K
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
40
0
0
0
40
Thru
3720
63
16
0
3799
Left
22
0
0
0
22
Peds
106
0
0
0
106
InOut Total
3957 3888 7845
80 63 143
5 16 21
0 0 0
4042 8009 3967
Rig
h
t
12
0 0 0
12
Th
r
u
0 0 0 0 0
Le
f
t
0 0 0 0 0
Pe
d
s
0 0 0 0 0
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
22
12
34
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
34
12
Left
18
0
0
0
18
Thru
3945
80
5
0
4030
Right
0
0
0
0
0
Peds
36
0
0
0
36
Out TotalIn
3749 3999 7748
63 80 143
16 5 21
0 0 0
3828 7912 4084
Le
f
t
0 0 0 0 0
Th
r
u
0 0 0 0 0
Rig
h
t
29
0 0 0
29
Pe
d
s
0 0 0 0 0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
58
29
87
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
58
87
29
2/16/2022 06:00 AM
2/16/2022 07:45 PM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 169
File Name : SITE 2
Site Code : SITE 2
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 4
US 421 AND HILL VALLEY WALK / SOUTHERN
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: MICHAEL JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
HILL VALLEY WALK
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHERN CHARM RD.
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-
TURNS
Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 01:00 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 165 3 6 0 174 0 0 2 0 2 2 329 0 3 0 334 0 0 2 0 2 512
08:15 AM 2 249 0 12 0 263 0 0 0 0 0 1 279 0 1 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 544
08:30 AM 1 193 0 16 0 210 0 0 1 0 1 1 316 0 0 0 317 0 0 0 0 0 528
08:45 AM 2 304 1 2 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 3 0 242 0 0 1 0 1 552
Total Volume 5 911 4 36 0 956 0 0 3 0 3 4 1163 0 7 0 1174 0 0 3 0 3 2136
% App. Total 0.5 95.3 0.4 3.8 0 0 0 100 0 0.3 99.1 0 0.6 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .625 .749 .333 .563 .000 .773 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .500 .884 .000 .583 .000 .879 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .967
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
C
H
A
R
M
R
D
.
H
I
L
L
V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
L
K
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
4
Thru
911
Left
5
Peds
36
InOut Total
1166 956 2122
Rig
h
t
3
Th
r
u
0
Le
f
t
0
Pe
d
s
0
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
5
3
8
Left
4
Thru
1163
Right
0
Peds
7
Out TotalIn
914 1174 2088
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Rig
h
t
3
Pe
d
s
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
8
3
11
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
Peak Hour Data
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 170
File Name : SITE 2
Site Code : SITE 2
Start Date : 2/16/2022
Page No : 5
US 421 AND HILL VALLEY WALK / SOUTHERN
WILMINGTON NEW HANOVER CO.
WEATHER: SUNNY
COUNTED BY: MICHAEL JOHNSON
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
SOUTHBOUND
HILL VALLEY WALK
WESTBOUND
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHERN CHARM RD.
EASTBOUND
Start Time Left Thru Right U-
TURNS
Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right U-Turns Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:15 PM to 07:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 2 353 3 5 0 363 0 0 0 0 0 1 265 0 0 1 267 0 0 2 0 2 632
05:15 PM 3 267 3 8 0 281 0 0 0 0 0 1 232 0 0 3 236 0 0 3 0 3 520
05:30 PM 0 298 6 10 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 2 264 0 0 10 276 0 0 1 0 1 591
05:45 PM 0 314 9 9 0 332 0 0 2 0 2 0 279 0 0 0 279 0 0 1 0 1 614
Total Volume 5 1232 21 32 0 1290 0 0 2 0 2 4 1040 0 0 14 1058 0 0 7 0 7 2357
% App. Total 0.4 95.5 1.6 2.5 0 0 0 100 0 0.4 98.3 0 0 1.3 0 0 100 0
PHF .417 .873 .583 .800 .000 .888 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .500 .932 .000 .000 .350 .948 .000 .000 .583 .000 .583 .932
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
C
H
A
R
M
R
D
.
H
I
L
L
V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
L
K
US 421 (CAROLINA BEACH RD.)
Right
21
Thru
1232
Left
5
Peds
32
InOut Total
1042 1290 2332
Rig
h
t
2
Th
r
u
0
Le
f
t
0
Pe
d
s
0
Ou
t
To
t
a
l
In
5
2
7
Left
4
Thru
1040
Right
0
Peds
14
Out TotalIn
1239 1058 2297
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
7
Pe
d
s
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
25
7
32
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
PV
DUALS
TTST
TWINS
Peak Hour Data
North
TRUE DIRECTION TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC.
236-1 GRANDVIEW DR.
SNEADS FERRY NC 28460
TRUEDIRECTIONTRAFFIC@GMAIL.COM
919-749-3979
MICHAEL JOHNSON
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 171
Supporting Documentation
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 172
SIGNAL FACE I.D.
NOTES
Isolated
Fully Actuated
3 Phase
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SEAL
PREPARED BY:
SIG. INVENTORY NO.
SCALE REVISIONS
REVIEWED BY:
INIT.DATE
REVIEWED BY:
DATESIGNATURE
PLAN DATE:
0
Division 3 New Hanover County Wilmington
SR 1492 (Myrtle Grove Road)
at
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road)
November 2015 PLA
Jeff Spence
1"=40'
40
Plan of Record
03-0908
POR
j
r
s
p
e
n
c
e
S
:
\
I
T
S
&
S
U
\
I
T
S
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
\
S
i
g
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
\
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
R
e
g
i
o
n
\
D
i
v
-
0
3
\
P
O
R
\
0
3
-
0
9
0
8
\
0
3
0
9
0
8
_
s
i
g
_
p
o
r
_
2
0
2
0
m
m
m
d
d
.
d
g
n
1
4
-
J
U
L
-
2
0
2
0
1
1
:
0
0
All Heads L.E.D.
Directional Arrow
Controller & Cabinet
Signal Pole with Guy
With Push Button & Sign
Signal Pole with Sidewalk Guy
Inductive Loop Detector
Traffic Signal Head
Pedestrian Signal Head
2-in Underground Conduit
LEGEND
PROPOSED EXISTING
Sign
Modified Signal Head N/A
Junction Box
N/A Right of Way
Metal Pole with Mastarm existing
existing
"YIELD" Sign (R1-2)A A
existin
g
existin
g
existin
g
existin
g
existing
existing
R
Y
G
12"
55 Mph 0% Grade
55 Mph 0% GradeUS 421 (Carolina Beach Road)
US 421 (Carolina Beach Road)
45
Mp
h 0
%
Grade
SR 14
9
2
(
Myrtle Grove Road)
N
ex
ex
ex
ex
e
x
e
x
61
62
21
22
41 42
Sig.1.0
Soil
Soil Soil Soil
ex
ex
Std case A3
6.250005
Metal Pole #2
Std case B6
6.250005
Metal Pole #1
Std case B6
6.250005
Metal Pole #3
ex
11
23
R
Y
FY
12"
R
Y
FY
12"
PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT
UNSIGNALIZED MOVEMENT
UNDETECTED MOVEMENT (OVERLAP)
DETECTED MOVEMENT
PHASING DIAGRAM DETECTION LEGEND
PHASING DIAGRAM
02+6
TABLE OF OPERATION
FACE
SIGNAL
PHASE
02+6 FLASH
04
04
FEATURE 6
ON
---
----
--
-
--
--
--
ON ON ON
-
-
MIN RECALL
YELLOW
-
-
--
Min Green 1 *
Extension 1 *
Max Green 1 *
Yellow Clearance
Red Clearance
W alk 1 *
Don't Walk 1
Seconds Per Actuation *
Max Variable Initial *
Time Before Reduction *
Time To Reduce *
Minimum Gap
Recall Mode
Vehicle Call Memory
Dual Entry
Simultaneous Gap
--
--
OASIS 2070 TIMING CHART
be lower than 4 seconds.
phases 2 and 6 lower than what is shown. Min Green for all other phases should not
* These values may be field adjusted. Do not adjust Min Green and Extension times for
TURNS
INDUCTIVE LOOPS
PHASE
DETECTOR PROGRAMMING
LOOP
TIME
DELAY
(FT)
STOPBAR
FROM
DISTANCE
(FT)
SIZE
TIME
STRETCH
NE
W
C
A
R
D
NE
W
L
O
O
P
FU
L
L
T
I
M
E
D
E
L
A
Y
EX
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
CA
L
L
I
N
G
SY
S
T
E
M
L
O
O
P
-
Y Y ----
-
-
-
-
-
-Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y Y --
-
-
-
-
-Y
Y
Y
Y
Y ---
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
OASIS 2070 LOOP & DETECTOR INSTALLATION CHART
01+6
0
1
+
6
1 2 4
MIN RECALL
YELLOW
5 14 5 14
PHASE
6.0 1.0 6.02.0
60 20 60
5.2
1.0
3.0
3.1
5.2
1.0
1.5
46
15
30
3.4
1.5
46
15
30
3.4
15
11
21
61,62
41,42
22,23
2A
2B
4A
6A
6B
1A
6X6
6X6
6X6
6X6
420
420
420
420
6X40 0 2-4-2
2-4-2
2
2
4
6
6
6X40 0
1
6 Y
3
3
15
11
21
22,23
41,42
61,62
G
G
GR
R
R
Y
Y
R
F
Y
F
Y R
G
R
R
F
Y R Y
Y
3.0
2.4
ex
ex
-
-
-
-
-
PREPARED BY: Jeff Spence July 2020 DATE:
DATE: July 2020 REVIEWED BY: KGP,Jr.
COMMENTS
Plan of Record
its original state.
by field personnel. This plan may have been modified from
This plan of record reflects existing field conditions as submitted
DATE: SIGNATURE:
document.
considered a certified
This document shall not be
on 11/3/15
Pamela L. Alexander, 023489
issued and sealed by
This document originally
Not a certified document.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED
FINAL UNLESS ALL
SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Updated side street lane configuration
EXIST
EXIST
EXIST
EXIST
presence mode.
5. Set all detector units to
3. Phase 1 may be lagged.
the Engineer.
unless otherwise directed by
night flashing operation
2. Do not program signal for late
Structures" dated January 2018.
Specifications for Roads and
2018 and "Standard
Drawings NCDOT" dated January
1. Refer to "Roadway Standard
4. Do not install backplates.
ex
2A
2B
4A
1A
6B
6A
T N
T
T
I
N
D
E
P
A
R
T
ME
N OF TRA SPORT
A
IO
N
STA
E OF NORTH C
AROL
A
noisi
v
i
D
ytefaS dna ytiliboM noitatrop
sn
a
r
T
noitceS ngiseD la
n
giS
750 N. Greenfield Pkwy, Garner, NC 27529
Prepared in the Offices of:
A A
7/14/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 173
CVAF Flow Rate Adjusted Flow Rate Turning Demand
AM Peak 1 1261 AM Peak 1261 192
PM Peak 1 1118 PM Peak 1118 145
Peak Hour Volumes Peak Hour Volumes
US 17 SB U-TURN AND HILL VALLEY
WALK
AM Peak PM Peak
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
INTERSECTIONS WITH TWO OR THREE
APPROACHES
DocuSign Envelope ID: BD540FE9-3799-46EC-808B-CD15968B1EDF
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 12 - 174
Public Comments
In Support 0
Neutral 0
In Opposition 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 13 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 14 - 1
Supplementary Applicant
Materials
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 15 - 1
To Whom it May Concern,
I visited the referenced tract at 6844 Carolina Beach Rd., on Saturday, July 16th 2022 to review
a tree location and identification survey provided by Michael Underwood & Associates. My
assessment of the hardwood trees classified as “significant” were more accurately measured
and are labeled by species and size on the attached exhibit. Pine trees are predominantly
“Loblolly” pines. Only a single Longleaf pine with a DBH of less than 15’’ was identified. No trees
classified as “specimen” were evidenced.
My recommendation would be to have the tract revisited after underbrush is cleared, and during
detailed design and permitting. That would allow additional evaluation of the health of the larger
trees necessary for removal, and for required mitigation calculation.
Please contact me with any further questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Jonathan Osborne, Certified Arborist
Cert ID # SO-10484A
828-476-6188
willoughby2316@gmail.com
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 16 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 1 - 16 - 2
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/5/2023
Technical Review Commiee Report
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Zach Dickerson, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Zach Dickerson; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Rezoning Request (Z22-25) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solu6ons, applicant, on behalf of Willie Moore,
Jr. and Joyce Ruffin, property owners, to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 4.65 acres of land located at
2700 and 2707 Old Wrightsboro Road from AR, Airport Residen6al, to (CZD) AC, Condi6onal Airport Commerce
for an office and warehouses.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 4.65 acres from AR, Airport Residen+al to (CZD) AC, Condi+onal
Airport Commerce in order to construct three buildings: one 10,000 square foot flex space building, one 20,125 square
foot climate-controlled self-storage building, and one 32,775 square foot climate controlled self-storage building.
The applicant's concept plan includes the proposed buildings along with a fenced buffer along the southwestern
boundary of the site. The concept plan outlines the parking areas for the development and the stormwater pond. The
self-storage por+on of the project includes internal security gates.
The subject property is located on Old Wrightsboro Road, south of the intersec+on of N Kerr Avenue and Blue Clay
Road, in the vicinity of the Wilmington Interna+onal Airport.
The maximum building height allowed in the AC district is 35 feet; this project's proposed height does not exceed 18
feet.
The subject site consists of two parcels, both zoned AR, Airport Residen+al. The surrounding area to the north is zoned
Airport Commerce and is used for commercial purposes; the surrounding area to the south is zoned Airport
Residen+al.
The AR district in this area was established in 1976. At the +me, the purpose of the AR district was to promote low-
density housing in the vicinity of the airport and discourage uses which tend to concentrate large numbers of people
like schools, hospitals, and assisted living facili+es.
The purpose of the AC district is to provide lands to accommodate planned restricted business and industrial
development in which the principal use of the land is for indoor manufacturing, distribu+on and other types of
opera+ons that are compa+ble with the airport facili+es and require sites near to railroads and/or major
thoroughfares.
Access is proposed to the subject property from Old Wrightsboro Road, an NCDOT-maintained secondary street.
Access on Old Wrightsboro Road will be a full access movement for ingress and egress.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2
It is es+mated that the office and flex space will generate 16 AM and 15 PM peak trips, and the self storage is
es+mated to generate 7 AM and 14 PM peak trips. The es+mated traffic genera+on from this site is under the 100
peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis.
The Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as Employment Center, which serves as an employment and produc+on hub
where office and light industrial uses predominate. Commercial uses designed to serve the needs of the employment
center are appropriate. The applicant has proposed a condi+on that would limit the permied uses of the commercial
development to be compa+ble with the exis+ng surrounding uses.
The proposed rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area
designated as Employment Center and provides for the types of uses recommended by that place type. This project
will provide area-serving commercial development that is compa+ble with its proximity to a commercial node and the
Wilmington Interna+onal Airport.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Based on the recommended uses for Employment Center places, the context and compa+bility with the immediate
surrounding area and the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends approval of this applica+on and suggests the
following mo+on with the proposed condi+ons.
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as Employment Center and provides for
the types of uses recommended by that place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide area-serving commercial development that is
compa+ble with its proximity to a commercial node and the Wilmington Interna+onal Airport.
Proposed Condi6ons:
1. In addi+on to acknowledging all of the prescribed standards for the Airport Commerce (AC) district, addressing
access, ligh+ng, radio and electronic devices, and visual hazards, the developer will limit the proposed uses to:
a. Animal Grooming
b. Mini-Warehousing
c. General Office
d. Personal Services
e. Business Services
f. Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage)
g. Instruc+onal Studios
h. Retail Sales
2. No outdoor RV or boat trailer storage is permied.
Alterna6ve Mo6on for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as Employment Center and provides for
the types of uses recommended by that place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because it is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and will
adversely impact the adjacent neighborhood.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip+on
Z22-25 Planning Board Script
Z22-25 Planning Board Staff Report
Z22-25 Zoning Map
Z22-25 FLUM
Z22-25 Mailout Map
Initial Application Cover Sheet
Z22-25 Application
Z22-25 Community Meeting Information
Concept Plan Cover Sheet
Z22-25 Concept Plan
Public Comments Cover Sheet
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2
PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT
for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z22-25)
Item 3: Rezoning Request (Z22-25) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf
of Willie Moore, Jr. and Joyce Ruffin, property owners, to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 4.65
acres of land located at 2700 and 2707 Old Wrightsboro Road from AR, Airport Residential, to (CZD)
AC, Airport Commercial for an office and warehouses.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes
for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
f. Staff review of any additional conditions
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on
the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw
your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote?
6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) AC, Airport
Commerce District. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as Employment Center and
provides for the types of uses recommended by that place type. I also find RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project
will provide area-serving commercial development that is compatible with its proximity to a
commercial node and the Wilmington International Airport.
Proposed Conditions:
1. In addition to acknowledging all of the prescribed standards for the Airport Commercial
(AC) district, addressing access, lighting, radio and electronic devices, and visual hazards,
the developer will limit the proposed uses to:
a. Animal Grooming
b. Mini-Warehousing
c. General Office
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1
d. Personal Services
e. Business Services
f. Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage)
g. Instructional Studios
h. Retail Sales
2. No outdoor RV or boat trailer storage is permitted.
Example Motion for Denial
I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) AC, Airport Commerce
District. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive
Plan because it is located in an area designated as Employment Center and provides for the
types of uses recommended by that place type, I also find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the
rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it is not consistent with the
desired character of the surrounding community and will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhood.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a conditional (CZD)
AC, Airport Commerce district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in
the public interest because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 1 of 15
STAFF REPORT FOR Z22-25
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z22-25
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional AC, Airport Commerce District
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Willie Jackson Moore, et.al.
Location: Acreage:
2700 & 2706 Old Wrightsboro Rd 4.65
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R03300-004-006-000 & R03300-004-005-
000 Employment Center
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Single Family Residential
General Office and Mini-Warehouse/Self-
Storage
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
AR, Airport Residential District (CZD) AC, Airport Commerce District
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Commercial Services, Light Industrial AC
East Residential, Undeveloped AR
South Commercial Services AC
West Commercial Services AC
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 2 of 15
ZONING HISTORY
October 4, 1976 Initially zoned AR (Area Airport)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer
Water services are not available through CFPUA. Private well will be
required, subject to New Hanover County Health Department approval.
Sanitary sewer is available through CFPUA.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Wrightsboro Station
Schools Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High
Schools
Recreation Optimist Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No known conservation resources
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 3 of 15
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to construct three buildings: one 10,000 sq ft. flex space building,
one 20,125 sq ft. climate-controlled self-storage building, and one 32,775 sq ft. climate-
controlled storage building.
• Under the proposed AC zoning district, buildings may be no higher than 35’ without an FAA
determination of “no hazard,” which is determined through a filing with the FAA.
• The buildings are proposed to be a maximum of one story at 18’.
• The applicant has proposed limiting uses in the flex space to the following:
o Animal Grooming
o Mini-Warehousing
o General Office
o Personal Services
Flex Space
Storage Facilities
Site Access
Fenced Buffer
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 4 of 15
o Business Services
o Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage)
o Instructional Studios
o Retail Sales
• The applicant has included as a condition that no outdoor RV or boat trailer storage is
allowed.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The AR district in this area was established in 1976. At the time, the purpose of the AR
district was to promote low density housing in the vicinity of the airport and discourage uses
which tend to concentrate large numbers of people like schools, hospitals, and assisted living
facilities.
• While the site is zoned AR, many of the surrounding properties are zoned AC and are used
for commercial purposes.
• As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed up to four single family homes.
• The AC district was established to provide lands to accommodate planned restricted
business and industrial development in which the principal use of the land is for indoor
manufacturing, distribution, and other types of operations that are compatible with the
airport facilities and require sites near to railroads and/or major thoroughfares. The specific
intent of the district is to:
o Encourage the types of development that are compatible with airport operations;
o Protect and promote the public utility of Wilmington International Airport;
o Promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of New Hanover
County by preventing the creation of hazards around the airport to protect the lives
and property of both the users of the airport and nearby residents; and
o Prevent destruction or impairment of the utility of the airport and the public’s
investment.
• The AC District prescribes additional standards as described below:
o Access:
▪ Any means of direct access to or from any development shall not be through
any land in a Residential district or land on which there is residential
development, or along any street or road in a residential subdivision.
o Lighting
▪ Any pulsating, flashing, rotating, oscillating, or other type of light intended
as an attention-getting device is prohibited.
▪ Flood lights, spotlights, or another lighting device shall be arranged or
shielded so as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an
imaginary line extended from the light source parallel to the ground.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 5 of 15
o Radio and Electronic Device
▪ Any radio or electronic device is permitted only in conjunction with a valid
license or other authorization as may be issued by the FCC.
▪ Any radio or electronic device, the operation of which would violate any
rules or regulations of the FCC is prohibited.
o Visual Hazards
▪ Any operation or use that emits smoke, dust, or creates glare or other visual
hazards is prohibited.
• If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and Zoning
Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and
specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved
conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 6 of 15
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 7 of 15
TRANSPORTATION
• Access is proposed to the subject property from Old Wrightsboro Road, an NCDOT
maintained secondary street.
• Access on Old Wrightsboro Road will be full access movement for ingress and egress.
• As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 3 AM / 4 PM trips during
the peak hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed three-building
development would increase the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 20
AM / 25 PM trips.
• The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that
triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 8 of 15
• The WMPO provided trip generation numbers for some of the other uses outlined in the
application for the 10,000 sq ft building, noted in the table below:
• Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts at this time, Staff has
provided the volume to capacity ratio for the adjacent roadway near the subject site. While
volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the
function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through
intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level
of Service of a roadway. However, the available volume to capacity data indicates
capacity currently exists in this area.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2021
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C
LOS
N. Kerr Ave Castle Hayne Road to Blue
Clay Road 9,200 15,459 0.60 B
N. Kerr Ave Between Blue Clay Rd and
Bavarian Lane 12,500 15,459 0.81 D
• Before any development can occur on this site, the Technical Review Committee will review
all plans for compliance with applicable land use regulations, including any recommended
roadway improvement required through the NCDOT driveway permitting process.
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: 1 Single-Family
Dwelling 1 AM / 1 PM
Typical Development
under Current Zoning:
4 Single-Family
Dwellings 3 AM / 4 PM
Proposed Development:
10,000 sq ft flex space
52,900 sq ft self
storage
16 AM / 15 PM
7 AM / 14 PM
Potential Use 10,000 sq ft Specialty
Trade Contractor 17 AM / 19 PM
Most Intense Allowed Use 10,000 Strip Retail
Plaza 26 AM / 66 PM
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 8
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 9 of 15
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
• STIP Project U-5863
o Widening of Castle Hayne Road (NC 133) from the I-140/US-17
o The project is currently scheduled to begin construction after 2024.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 9
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 10 of 15
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed
by the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. Wrightsboro
Commons • 226 Multi-Family Units
• TIA approved November 28,
2018
• 2023 Build Out Year
The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• Installation of a new signal plan at the intersection of N. Kerr Avenue and Castle Hayne
Road.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• Riverside
Development Status: Project Phase 1 has been approved by the Technical Review Committee
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or the Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Smith Creek watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class II (moderate limitation); however, the site is expected to be served
by CFPUA sewer if developed.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 10
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 11 of 15
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of AR (Existing Zoning):
Low density housing on large lots, typical in an AR zone
Typical AR development
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 11
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 12 of 15
Representative Developments of AC (Proposed Zoning/Land Use):
Typical Office/Flex Space, Common in AC
Self-Storage, Gordon Road
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 12
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 13 of 15
Context and Compatibility
• The project is located on Old Wrightsboro Road, near the intersection of N Kerr Avenue
and Blue Clay Road, and is near the Wrightsboro commercial node.
• While much of the area to the south of the site is residential and zoned AR, many of the
surrounding properties to the north are used for commercial purposes and are zoned AC.
• Nearby commercial uses are low-intensity warehouses, equipment rental, equipment
suppliers and auto repair and supply.
• Due to the location and surrounding development patterns, the property is less likely to be
developed with low density housing.
• The applicant has proposed a condition that would limit the permitted uses of the commercial
development to be compatible with the existing surrounding uses.
• This area was zoned to be compatible with the establishment and growth of the Wilmington
International Airport in the 1970’s. Since that time, the airport has fostered commercial
growth in the surrounding areas.
• Text Amendment A-422, adopted in 2015, allowed additional uses in the Airport Industrial
(AI) district by-right and special use permit. This amendment expanded the range of uses
allowed in this district to be more in line with anticipated growth around the airport.
• The Airport Industrial (AI) district was rebranded to Airport Commerce (AC) as part of the
adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance to more accurately reflect the future needs
and business model of Wilmington International Airport.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 13
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 14 of 15
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Employment Center
Place Type
Description
Serves as an employment and production hub where office and light
industrial uses predominate. It can also include residential, civic, and
recreational uses, but should be clearly delineated from rural and
conservation area. Commercial uses designed to serve the needs of the
employment center are appropriate.
Analysis
The subject property is located in the northern portion of the county near the
Wilmington International Airport. It is near the intersection of N Kerr Avenue
and Blue Clay Road, and near the Wrightsboro commercial node.
The site is located near existing low-density single-family uses to the south
and other similar commercial developments to the north.
The Comprehensive Plan classifies the subject parcel as Employment Center.
Employment Center place types are generally applied in areas like this that
are intended to serve as employment and production hubs where office and
light industrial uses are easily available.
The subject property is in a transitional area in close proximity to a
commercial node and other similar uses. Commercial uses that serve the
surrounding area are appropriate for the place type and the area.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because it is located in an area designated as
Employment Center and provides for the types of uses recommended by
that place type. This project will provide area-serving commercial
development that is compatible with its proximity to a commercial node and
the Wilmington International Airport.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 14
Z22-25 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 15 of 15
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the recommended uses for the Employment Center
place type, the context and compatibility with the immediate surrounding area, and with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan.
As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is
located in an area designated as Employment Center and provides for the types of
uses recommended by that place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the
rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will
provide area-serving commercial development that is compatible with its proximity to
a commercial node and the Wilmington International Airport.
Proposed Conditions:
1. In addition to acknowledging all of the prescribed standards for the Airport
Commerce (AC) district, addressing access, lighting, radio and electronic devices,
and visual hazards, the developer will limit the proposed uses to:
a. Animal Grooming
b. Mini-Warehousing
c. General Office
d. Personal Services
e. Business Services
f. Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage)
g. Instructional Studios
h. Retail Sales
2. No outdoor RV or boat trailer storage is permitted.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it is
located in an area designated as Employment Center and provides for the types of
uses recommended by that place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because it is not consistent with the
desired character of the surrounding community and will adversely impact the adjacent
neighborhood.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 15
Kerr Av
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
R
d
O
l
d
W
r
i
g
h
t
s
b
o
r
o
R
d
CommerceRd
Aco
r
n
B
r
a
n
c
h
R
d
Kerr Av
New Hanover County, NC
CZD ACAR2700 & 2706
Old Wrightsboro Rd
Z22-25
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-25
CDFLAG
CZD
ZONING
AC
AR
Z22-25
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1
Kerr Av
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
R
d
O
l
d
W
r
i
g
h
t
s
b
o
r
o
R
d
CommerceRd
Aco
r
n
B
r
a
n
c
h
R
d
Kerr Av
New Hanover County, NC
CZD ACAR2700 & 2706
Old Wrightsboro Rd
Z22-25
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-25
Future Land Use
COMMERCE ZONE
EMPLOYMENT CENTER
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
Z22-25
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1
O
l
d
W
r
i
g
h
t
s
b
o
r
o
R
d
K e r r A v
Mutual Rd
Kerr Av
AcornBranchRd
Blu
e
C
l
a
y
R
d
Co
m
merceRd
Kerr Av
Neighboring Parcels (500 feet)
CZD ACAR2700 & 2706
Old Wrightsboro Rd
Z22-25
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
Site
Z22-25
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1
Initial Application
Documents & Materials
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1
Page 1 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION
This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s
online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart
below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the
application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Public Hearing Procedures
(Optional)
Pre-Application Conference
1
Community Information Meeting
2
Application Submittal & Acceptance
3
Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional)
4
Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification
5
Planning Board Hearing & Recom-mendation
6
Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision
7
Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
1. Applicant and Property Owner Information
Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent)
Company Company/Owner Name 2
Address Address
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip
Phone Phone
Email Email
Cindee Wolf
Design Solutions
P.O. Box 7221
Wilmington, NC 28406
910-620-2374
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Willie Jackson Moore, Jr. etal
405 Edgewater Club Road
Wilmington, NC 28411
910-508-6658 (Contact: Deans Hackney - Agent)
deans.hackney@gmail.com
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1
Page 2 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
2. Subject Property Information
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification
3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District:
Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the
district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the
corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District.
4. Proposed Condition(s)
Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater
restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may
be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the
surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below.
Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process.
2700 & 2706 Old Wrightsboro Road 313909.07.1048 & 313909.07.0490
AR Employment Center
CZD / AC 4.65 ac.+/-
4.65 ac.+/-
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2
Page 3 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
5. Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for
all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
ITE Land Use:
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.)
AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips:
6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified
Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for
use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at-large.
The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria.
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as
described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc.
General Office (710) & Mini-Warehouse (151)
10K & 52.9K (Gross Floor Area)
16 + 7 = 23 15 + 14 = 29
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3
Page 4 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the
2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map.
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4
Page 5 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the
listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as
“N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review;
Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal.
Application Checklist Applicant Initial
This application form, completed and signed
Application fee:
• $600 for 5 acres or less
• $700 for more than 5 acres
• $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review
Community meeting written summary
Traffic impact analysis (if applicable)
• The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided.
• The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on
the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda.
Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page
Reference of the property requested for rezoning
Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements:
Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
• Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements
o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type
of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries.
o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and
height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy,
and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used.
• Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed
rights-of-way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site;
arrangement and access provisions for parking areas.
• All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and
buffers.
• The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas.
• A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the
approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site
less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen
trees must be included.
• Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities
intended to serve the site.
• Approximate location of regulated wetlands.
• Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions
on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance
One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be
required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan.
One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
N/A
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5
Page 6 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
7. Acknowledgement and Signatures
By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the
Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is
presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this
application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to:
1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials;
2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments;
3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with
or arising out of this application; and
4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval.
Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s)
Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name
Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is
required for each owner of record.
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice
has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is
requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are
under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee
schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required.
Cynthia Wolf - Design Solutions
11/30/2022
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 6
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Location: 2700 & 2706 Old Wrightsboro Road (FKC Flex & Storage)
Proposed Zoning: AR to (CZD) AC
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above
zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by
first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on
November 17, 2022 . A copy of the written notice is also attached.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, November 29th,
6:00 p.m.; at the St. John AME Church, 2400 Acron Branch Road
The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in List
The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief synopsis was given of the
proposed development and the conditional district rezoning process. Primary topics of
conversation were the loss of residential land in the neighborhood, traffic, and particularly
how stormwater management and drainage worked. The low trip generation for a use such as
this was explained. Also, that storm drainage improvements, including not only on-site
management of runoff from project surfaces, but that there are other requirements, such as
mitigation of existing drainage ditch issues for an adequate overflow outlet. Additional
information was provided on buffering & tree preservation. Exhibits on current zoning, the
Comp Plan, and area topography were subsequently emailed or mailed to all who asked.
As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the rezoning petition: None
Date: November 30, 2022
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 2
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 3
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 4
ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITHIN 500' PERIMETER OF 2700 & 2706 OLD WRIGHTSBORO ROAD:
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESS UNIT
2716 OLD WRIGHTSBORO ROAD LLC 111 ANNANDALE DR CARY, NC 27511 2716 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
AIC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 11
AIC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 8
AIC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 7
AIC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 9
AIC CONDOMINIUM ASSOC INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 10
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 39
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 36
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 24
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 42
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 40
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 37
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 25
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 35
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 38
AIC PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 41
APCP LLC 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD #8A WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 30
BALLARD DARRYL 2618 ASHBY DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 2416 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
BALLARD KIMBERLY DENISE 2408 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2408 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
COOPER CATHERINE JORDAN ETAL 208 BERRY CT CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2606 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
DAL KNOX INC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405
DAL KNOX INC 3310 KITTY HAWK RD STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 6
EASLEY VERNETTA ETAL 7008 FOREST BEND LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 2616 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
GARY JEREMY DEAN 722 5TH AVE N WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 27
HAMPTON WILLIAM B JR 2449 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2449 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
HARRIS SHIRLEY M ROBERT 470 LENOX AVE APT 11‐E NEW YORK, NY 10037 2455 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
HOLMES ALCENIA MPO BOX 12345 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2443 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
JAMES CHAREASE 2101 ROCKHILL RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2428 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
JEMS HOLDINGS LLC 771 KERR AVE S WILMINGTON, NC 28403 2701 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
JEMS HOLDINGS LLC 771 KERR AVE S WILMINGTON, NC 28403 2701 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
JONES JOAN C 2424 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2424 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
LONG INVESTMENT PROP OF WILM LLC 7700 KENMONT RD GREENSBORO, NC 27409
LONG INVESTMENT PROP OF WILM LLC 7700 KENMONT RD GREENSBORO, NC 27409 100 EXPORT DR WILMINGTON
LONG INVESTMENT PROP OF WILM LLC 7700 KENMONT RD GREENSBORO, NC 27409
MCRAE MARGARET HEIRS 275 BLAKE AVE APT 2C BROOKLYN, NY 11212 2425 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
MILLER EDWARD HRS 2413 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2413 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
MOORE A LEON CATHERINE 2163 ONANDA WAY TOBYHANNA, PA 18466
MOORE HORACE L 1080 JULIA ST TEANECK, NJ 07666 2461 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
MOORE JAMES MACK HRS 103 KENTUCKY DOWNS PERRY, GA 31069 3037 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON
MOORE ROBERT T HEIRS 2431 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2431 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
MOORE WILLIE JACKSON JR ETAL 405 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2700 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
MOORE WILLIE JACKSON JR ETAL 405 EDGEWATER CLUB RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2706 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
NIXON CAROLYN 2600 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2600 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
NIXON RICHARD L 2612 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2612 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
PRICE VIVIAN JORDAN ETAL 1408 ROCKHILL RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 2601 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
RICHARDSON EVAN 2712 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2712 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
SDH1 PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2621 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
SDH1 PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 29
SDH1 PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 34
SDH1 PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 33
SDH1 PROPERTIES LLC 2926 BOUNDARY ST STE 100 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2613 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
SOUTHCO HOLDINGS LLC 3125 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON, NC 28401 3041 EXPORT LN WILMINGTON
ST JOHNS AME CHURCH 2400 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2400 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
TRASK FAMILY LAND LIMITED PT 5519 BAVARIAN LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 26
TRASK WILLIAM K FRANKIE C 5519 BAVARIAN LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 28
TRASK WILLIAM K FRANKIE C 5519 BAVARIAN LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 31
TRASK WILLIAM K FRANKIE C 5519 BAVARIAN LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2725 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON 32
WALDKIRCH RICHARD B CAROL W 7704 MASONBORO SOUND RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 2724 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
WILLIAMS PAULINE M 2717 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2717 OLD WRIGHTSBORO RD WILMINGTON
YOUR HOME SOLUTIONS LLC 205 ANTIQUE LACE WAY HOLLY SPRINGS, NC 27540 2437 ACORN BRANCH RD WILMINGTON
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 5
November 17, 2022
To: Adjacent Property Owners
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: 2700 Old Wrightsboro Road
My Client is interested in developing this property for flexible office space and climate‐controlled self‐
storage. Your property is located within the proximity of the proposed project.
This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A
Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific
standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that
only a specific set of uses, in this case the layout and proposed property improvements shown on the
attached exhibit, of an approved proposal can be developed.
The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the
tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity
for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements,
benefits and impacts.
A meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 29th, 6:00 p.m., at the St. John AME Church, 2400 Acorn
Branch Road.
If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910‐620‐2374, or email
cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project, and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to
the community.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 6
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 7
Concept Plan
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 10 - 1
Public Comments
In Support 0
Neutral 0
In Opposition 0
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/5/2023
Technical Review Commiee Report
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Julian Griffee, Current Planner
CONTACT(S): Julian Griffee; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Rezoning Request (Z22-26) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solu6ons, applicant, on behalf of Paul and Jane
Chaucer, property owners, to rezone one parcel totaling 0.362 acres of land located at 2626 Castle Hayne Road
from R-20, Residen6al to CZD CB, Community Business to convert an exis6ng single-family home for retail and
office use.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 0.36 acres at 2626 Castle Hayne Road from R-20, Residen/al to
(CZD) CB, Condi/onal Community Business. The proposed development consists of renova/ng a vacant single-family
dwelling into a retail and office space.
The R-20 district in this area was established in 1974. At the /me, the purpose of the R-20 district was to ensure that
housing served by private sep/c and wells would be developed at low densi/es. The CB district was established to
provide lands that accommodate the development, growth, and con/nued opera/on of businesses that serve
surrounding neighborhoods with goods and services needed for a variety of daily and long-term purposes. The CB
district also serves as a buffer between higher density / intensity development and moderate or low-density mul/-
family and single-family neighborhoods.
The proposed development consists of the conversion of an exis/ng single-family dwelling and associated accessory
structure for business and retail offices. The applicant requests to limit future uses to Offices for Private Business and
Professional Ac/vi/es, Instruc/onal Services & Studios, Personal Services (General, excluding Taoo Parlor), and Retail
Sales (General). The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes fenced bufferyards on the northern and eastern
boundaries of the subject parcel, associated parking, and streetyard plan/ngs fron/ng the Castle Hayne Road right-of-
way. The applicant has proposed that the exis/ng access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be upgraded to a commercial
driveway with permiAng and approval by NCDOT. Any free-standing sign(s) on the site are condi/oned to be
monument-style with landscaping around the base of the sign. No pole signs shall be permied and any sign(s) must be
located outside of NCDOT sight triangle lines. The applicant has also proposed condi/ons on ligh/ng in addi/on to the
provisions outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance.
With the extension of water and sewer services, the area has experienced a shiE with the addi/on of commercial and
residen/al growth to the south and west with (CZD) B-1, Shopping Center, UMXZ, O&I, B-2, and R-15 zoning at higher
densi/es within performance residen/al developments.
The CB district does not permit residen/al development and requires a 25-foot side interior setback, 30-foot rear
setback, and Type A opaque buffer from adjacent single-family development and residen/ally zoned proper/es.
The exis/ng 550 square foot structure at the rear of the property is currently considered an accessory structure and
may be located at least 5’ from the side and rear property lines. If the structure is used for any of the proposed uses, it
would no longer be considered an accessory structure, and therefore, would be subject to underlying zoning setback
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3
provisions and require a variance.
Access is proposed to be provided to the subject property from Castle Hayne Road, a minor arterial roadway as
designated by NCDOT. The driveway is currently full access to Castle Hayne Road, however, access will be restricted to
right-in, right-out per NCDOT.
T he es/mated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance
requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). As currently zoned, it is es/mated the site would generate about 1 trip
during the peak hours if developed at the permied density. The proposed 1,600 square foot development would
increase the es/mated number of peak hour trips by approximately 3 trips.
The Comprehensive Plan classifies the property as Community Mixed Use, which allows for low to moderate intensity
retail and services that can support nearby neighborhoods. The proposed (CZD) CB rezoning for Offices for Business &
Professional Offices; Instruc/onal Services and Studios; Personal Services, (General, excluding Taoo Parlor); and
Retail Sales (General) is generally CONSISTENT with the types of uses encouraged in the Community Mixed Use place
type.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
The subject site is located along Castle Hayne Road, a minor arterial roadway, and abuts the Wrightsboro commercial
node to the south. The proposal is expected to have a minimal impact on the adjacent residen/al proper/es and could
serve as an appropriate transi/on between the established residen/al and commercial uses located within the
Wrightsboro commercial node. Furthermore, the proposal seeks to limit access along Castle Hayne Road and is
es/mated to generate a minimal increase in trips.
As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following mo/on with the proposed
condi/ons:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with
the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the types of uses recommended
in the Community Mixed Use place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because the proposal allows service-oriented uses that could serve as an appropriate
transi/on between exis/ng residen/al uses and the Wrightsboro commercial node, the proposed use types allow for
services that are rela/vely low traffic generators, and the proposal seeks to reduce traffic conflicts.
Proposed Condi6ons:
1. Restric/ng the uses allowed within the district to allow for Business and Professional Offices,
Instruc/onal Services and Studios, Personal Services (General, excluding Taoo Parlor), and Retail
Sales (General).
2. The exis/ng access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be upgraded to a commercial driveway
with permiAng by NCDOT.
3. Plan/ngs will be installed along Castle Hayne Road frontage to meet current “street yard”
landscape requirements.
4. Any free-standing sign(s) on the site shall be monument style with landscaping around the
base of the sign. No pole signs shall be permied.
5. Exterior ligh/ng shall be controlled so that light spillage & glare is not directed at adjacent
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3
proper/es, neighboring areas, or motorists.
Alterna6ve Mo6on for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the type of uses
recommended in the Community Mixed Use place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not similar in use and intensity to other nearby uses and
would not serve as a benefit as it does not provide an appropriate transi/on between adjacent land uses.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip/on
Z22-26 Staff Report PB FINAL
Z22-26 Script PB FINAL
Z22-26 - Zoning
Z22-26 - FLUM
Z22-26 - Mailout
Initial Application Cover Sheet
Application Package PB
Concept Plan Cover Sheet
2626 Castle Hayne Road Concept Plan
Public Comments Cover Sheet
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 1 of 14
STAFF REPORT FOR Z22-26
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z22-26
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional CB, Community Business District
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Paul A. & Jane Chaucer
Location: Acreage:
2626 Castle Hayne Road 0.36
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R03311-004-017-001 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Vacant Single-Family Dwelling
Business & Professional Offices, Instructional
Services & Studios, Personal Services
(General, excluding Tattoo Parlor), Retail
Sales (General)
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-20, Residential District (CZD) CB, Community Business District
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single-Family Dwelling R-20
East Single-Family Dwellings R-20
South Undeveloped (CZD) B-1
West Commercial, Vacant Single-Family Dwelling B-2, O&I
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 2 of 14
ZONING HISTORY
July 1, 1974 Initially zoned R-20 (Area 10A)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, New Hanover County Wrightsboro Station
Schools Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High
Schools
Recreation Optimist Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No known conservation resources
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 3 of 14
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 0.36 acres at 2626 Castle Hayne Road
from R-20, Residential to (CZD) CB, Community Business. The proposed development consists
of the conversion of an existing single-family dwelling and associated accessory structure
for business and retail offices.
• The applicant requests to limit future uses to Offices for Private Business and Professional
Activities, Instructional Services & Studios, Personal Services (General, excluding Tattoo
Parlor), and Retail Sales (General).
• The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes fenced bufferyards on the northern and
eastern boundaries of the subject parcel, associated parking, and streetyard plantings
fronting the Castle Hayne Road right-of-way.
• The applicant has proposed that the existing access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be
upgraded to a commercial driveway with permitting and approval by NCDOT.
• Any free-standing sign(s) on the site are conditioned to be monument-style with landscaping
around the base of the sign. No pole signs shall be permitted and any sign(s) must be
located outside of the sight triangle lines.
• The applicant has also proposed conditions on lighting so that spillage and glare will not
be directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or motorists.
(CZD) B-1 Zoning / Vacant
Bufferyard
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 3
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 4 of 14
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The R-20 district in this area was established in 1974. At the time, the purpose of the R-20
district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed
at low densities. Since that time, water and sewer services have become available to the
surrounding area.
• With the extension of water and sewer services, the area has experienced a shift with the
addition of commercial and residential growth to the south and west with (CZD) B-1,
Shopping Center, UMXZ, O&I, B-2, and higher-density R-15 residential developments.
• The CB district was established to provide lands that accommodate the development,
growth, and continued operation of businesses that serve surrounding neighborhoods with
goods and services needed for a variety of daily and long-term purposes. The CB district
also serves as a buffer between higher density / intensity development and moderate or
low-density multi-family and single-family neighborhoods.
• The CB district does not permit residential development and requires a 25-foot side
interior setback, 30-foot rear setback, and Type A opaque buffer from adjacent single-
family development and residentially zoned properties.
• The existing 550 square foot structure is currently considered an accessory structure and
may be located within the underlying zoning district’s setbacks, as long as it is no closer
than 5’ from the side and rear property lines. If the structure is used for any of the
proposed uses, it would no longer be considered an accessory structure, and therefore,
would be subject to underlying zoning setback provisions and require a variance.
• If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and Zoning
Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements
and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the
approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 4
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 5 of 14
AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 5
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 6 of 14
TRANSPORTATION
• Access is proposed to be provided to the subject property from Castle Hayne Road, a minor
arterial roadway as designated by NCDOT.
• The driveway is currently full access to Castle Hayne Road, however, access will be
restricted to right-in, right-out per NCDOT.
• As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 1 trip during the peak
hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed 1,600 square foot development
would increase the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 3 trips.
• The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that
triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 6
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 7 of 14
• Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts at this time, Staff has
provided the volume to capacity ratio for the adjacent roadway near the subject site. While
volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the
function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through
intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level
of Service of a roadway.
NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2021
Road Location Volume Capacity V/C LOS
Castle Hayne Road 2600 Block of Castle
Hayne Road 17,500 16,803 1.04 F
• Before any development can occur on this site, the Technical Review Committee will review
all plans for compliance with applicable land use regulations, including any recommended
roadway improvement required through the NCDOT driveway permitting process.
Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips
Existing Development: 1 Single-Family
Dwelling 1 AM / 1 PM
Proposed Development as:
Instructional Studio
General Retail
Business/Professional Office
Personal Services
1,600 SF
3 AM / 3 PM
4 AM / 11 PM
3 AM / 3 PM
4 AM / 12 PM
Proposed Development with
Accessory Structure as:
Instructional Studio
General Retail
Business/Professional Office
Personal Services
2,150 SF
4 AM / 4 PM
5 AM / 14 PM
4 AM / 5 PM
6 AM / 16 PM
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 7
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 8 of 14
Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses
Nearby NC STIP Projects:
• STIP Project U-5863
o Project to widen Castle Hayne Road into multi-lanes from I-140 to Division Drive.
Right-of-Way acquisition and utilities is currently scheduled to take place in FY
2025.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 8
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 9 of 14
Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses:
Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards.
Approved analyses must be re-examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed
by the build out date established within the TIA.
Proposed Development Land Use/Intensity TIA Status
1. Wrightsboro
Commons • 226 Multi-Family Units
• TIA approved November 28,
2018
• 2023 Build Out Year
The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable
improvements consisted of:
• Installation of a new signal plan at the intersection of N. Kerr Avenue and Castle Hayne
Road.
Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA:
• Riverside
Development Status: Phase 1 preliminary plan approved by the Technical Review
Committee.
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The subject site is not located within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Ness Creek watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class II (moderate limitations). There is an existing septic system on the
property. However, the site is expected to be served by CFPUA when developed.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 9
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 10 of 14
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Existing Conditions
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of CB:
Aldi on S. College Road in Wilmington
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 10
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 11 of 14
Examples of Residential Structures converted into Businesses:
Converted residential structure along Oleander Drive
Converted residential structure along Wrightsville Avenue
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 11
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 12 of 14
Context and Compatibility
• The property is located on Castle Hayne Road, a minor arterial road, just north of the N
Kerr Avenue – Castle Hayne Road intersection and abuts the Wrightsboro commercial node.
• The property is in a transitional area on the edge of the Wrightsboro commercial node, a
node that has seen an influx of more intense and diverse uses of varying densities.
• The surrounding area contains a mixture of uses, with established residential uses to the north
and east, and commercially zoned parcels to the west and south.
• Due to the existing zoning, location, and nearby development patterns, a single-family
residential use on this parcel may not be the most appropriate use for the parcel.
• STIP project U-5863 seeks to improve traffics movements along Castle Hayne Road. A
median is intended to be located directly in front of this parcel, making it less appropriate
for single-family residential.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 12
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 13 of 14
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors.
Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational,
commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential.
Analysis
The subject property is located along a minor arterial roadway corridor,
Castle Hayne Road, and is surrounded by single-family dwellings to the
north and east, a vacant structure on O&I zoned property to the west, and
a (CZD) B-1 parcel to the south. Within the general vicinity exists commercial
uses on parcels both north and south of the subject site, the latter of which
are located within the Wrightsboro commercial node.
The Comprehensive Plan classifies the property as Community Mixed Use,
which allows for low to moderate intensity retail and services that can
support nearby neighborhoods. The Community Mixed Use place type
designation encourages a mix of uses, including single- and multi-family
residential, commercial, civic, mixed-use, and recreational uses. Typical
zoning associated with this place type includes moderate density residential,
commercial, office and institutional, and mixed-use.
The site is located between the Wrightsboro commercial node and
established residential uses where transitional commercial uses could be
appropriate. The place type is consistent with the anticipated gradual
conversion of residential properties into commercial and mixed-use projects
along the heavily traveled corridor. The use of single-family residential on
this parcel is less likely to be appropriate than the uses allowed within the
proposed zoning district.
The CB district provides areas for commercial growth to serve existing and
future residential development and could act as a buffer between higher
density / intensity development and moderate to low density residential
neighborhoods.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed (CZD) CB rezoning for Offices for Business & Professional
Offices; Instructional Services and Studios; Personal Services, (General,
excluding Tattoo Parlor); and Retail Sales (General) is generally
CONSISTENT with the types of uses encouraged in the Community Mixed
Use place type.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 13
Z22-26 Staff Report PB 1.5.2023 Page 14 of 14
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The subject site is located along Castle Hayne Road, a minor arterial roadway, and abuts the
Wrightsboro commercial node to the south. The proposal is expected to have a minimal impact on
the adjacent residential properties and could serve as an appropriate transition between the
established residential and commercial uses located within the Wrightsboro commercial node.
Furthermore, the proposal seeks to limit access along Castle Hayne Road and is estimated to
generate a minimal increase in trips.
As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion with
the proposed conditions:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. I
find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan
because the project provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community
Mixed Use place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request
is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal allows service-oriented
uses that could serve as an appropriate transition between existing residential uses and
the Wrightsboro commercial node, the proposed use types allow for services that are
relatively low traffic generators, and the proposal seeks to reduce traffic conflicts.
Proposed Conditions:
1. Restricting the uses allowed within the district to allow for Business and
Professional Offices, Instructional Services and Studios, Personal Services
(General, excluding Tattoo Parlor), and Retail Sales (General).
2. The existing access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be upgraded to a
commercial driveway with permitting by NCDOT.
3. Plantings will be installed along Castle Hayne Road frontage to meet current
“street yard” landscape requirements.
4. Any free-standing sign(s) on the site shall be monument style with landscaping
around the base of the sign. No pole signs shall be permitted.
5. Exterior lighting shall be controlled so that light spillage & glare is not directed
at adjacent properties, neighboring areas, or motorists.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. While I
find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan
because the project provides for the type of uses recommended in the Community
Mixed Use place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not similar in use and
intensity to other nearby uses and would not serve as a benefit as it does not provide
an appropriate transition between adjacent land uses.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 14
PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT
for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z22-26)
Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf of Paul and Jane Chaucer,
property owners, to rezone one parcel totaling 0.362 acres of land located at 2626 Castle Hayne Road
from R-20, Residential to CZD CB, Community Business to convert an existing single-family home for
retail and office use.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes
for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
f. Staff review of any additional conditions
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board discussion
5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on
the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw
your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote?
6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or
is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Approval
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. I find it to
be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project
provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community Mixed Use place type. I also
find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because the proposal allows service-oriented uses that could serve as an appropriate transition
between existing residential uses and the Wrightsboro commercial node, the proposed use
types allow for services that are relatively low traffic generators, and the proposal seeks to
reduce traffic conflicts.
Proposed Conditions:
1. Restricting the uses allowed within the district to allow for Business and Professional
Offices, Instructional Services and Studios, Personal Services (General, excluding Tattoo
Parlor), and Retail Sales (General).
2. The existing access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be upgraded to a commercial
driveway with permitting by NCDOT.
3. Plantings will be installed along Castle Hayne Road frontage to meet current “street
yard” landscape requirements.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 1
4. Any free-standing sign(s) on the site shall be monument style with landscaping around the
base of the sign. No pole signs shall be permitted.
5. Exterior lighting shall be controlled so that light spillage & glare is not directed at
adjacent properties, neighboring areas, or motorists.
Example Motion for Denial
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) CB district. While I find it
to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project
provides for the type of uses recommended in the Community Mixed Use place type, I find
recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because
the proposal is not similar in use and intensity to other nearby uses and would not serve as a
benefit as it does not provide an appropriate transition between adjacent land uses.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a conditional CB
district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in
the public interest because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 2
Riverside Dr
L o n g L e a f D r
Wind Sail Dr
Laurel Dr
Sheridan Dr
Harrells Ln
Horne Place Dr
Kerr Av
CZD B-1
B-1
AR
O&I
SC
B-2
R-15
R-20
UMXZ
New Hanover County, NC
Site
Z22-26
CZD CBR-202626 Castle Hayne RdZ22-26
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
CDFLAG
CZD
ZONING
B-1
B-2
SC
O&I
AR
R-15
R-20
UMXZ
Z22-26
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 1
Riverside Dr
L o n g L e a f D r
Wind Sail Dr
Laurel Dr
Sheridan Dr
Harrells Ln
H o rnePlace D r
Kerr Av
New Hanover County, NC
Site
Z22-26
CZD CBR-202626 Castle Hayne RdZ22-26
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US Feet
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
Z22-26
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 1
TributaryCir
Al
b
a
t
r
o
s
s
R
u
n
Castle
Hayne
Rd
Riverside Dr
Wind Sail Dr
Sheridan Dr
Laurel Dr
Whitman Av
Long Leaf Dr
Harrells Ln
Kerr Av
Horne Place Dr
Site
Z22-26
Neighboring Parcels (500 feet)
CZD CBR-202626 Castle Hayne RdZ22-26
Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 250 500 US FeetPlanning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 5 - 1
Initial Application
Documents & Materials
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 1
Page 1 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION
This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s
online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart
below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the
application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Public Hearing Procedures
(Optional)
Pre-Application Conference
1
Community Information Meeting
2
Application Submittal & Acceptance
3
Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional)
4
Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification
5
Planning Board Hearing & Recom-mendation
6
Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision
7
Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
1. Applicant and Property Owner Information
Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent)
Company Company/Owner Name 2
Address Address
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip
Phone Phone
Email Email
Cindee Wolf
Design Solutions
P.O. Box 7221
Wilmington, NC 28406
910-620-2374
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Paul A. & Jane Chaucer
P.O. Box 591
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
910-264-3507 (Contact: Jane Chaucer)
jemchaucer@gmail.com
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 2
Page 2 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
2. Subject Property Information
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification
3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District:
Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the
district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the
corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District.
4. Proposed Condition(s)
Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater
restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may
be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the
surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below.
Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process.
2626 Castle Hayne Road 312907.68.0445 [R03311-004-017-001]
0.362 ac. / 15,750 s.f. R-20 Community Mixed-Use
0.362 ac.
/ Vacant Residence
(CZD) CB
The petition is for a rezoning of the subject parcel for Residential (R-20) to Conditional Zoning
District - Community Business [(CZD) CB]. The proposed project is to renovate the existing
structure for commercial use(s), which would include:
* Business & Professional Offices
* Instructional Services & Studios
* Personal Services (General, excluding Tattoo Parlor)
* Retail Sales (General)
The existing access drive to Castle Hayne Road will be upgraded to a commercial driveway with
permitting by NCDOT.
Plantings will be installed along Castle Hayne Road frontage to meet current "street yard"
landscape requirements.
Any free-standing sign(s) on the site shall be monument-style with landscaping around the base
of the sign. No pole signs shall be permitted.
Exterior lighting shall be controlled so that light spillage & glare is not directed at adjacent
properties, neighboring areas, or motorists.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 3
Page 3 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
5. Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of
the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for
all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this
application.
ITE Land Use:
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.)
AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips:
6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be
consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified
Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for
use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at-large.
The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria.
1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as
described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc.
?? Health / Fitness Club (492)
2200 s.f. GFA
3 8
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 4
Page 4 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the
2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map.
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning?
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 5
Page 5 of 6
Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the
listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as
“N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review;
Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal.
Application Checklist Applicant Initial
This application form, completed and signed
Application fee:
• $600 for 5 acres or less
• $700 for more than 5 acres
• $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review
Community meeting written summary
Traffic impact analysis (if applicable)
• The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided.
• The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on
the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda.
Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page
Reference of the property requested for rezoning
Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements:
Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
• Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements
o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type
of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries.
o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and
height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy,
and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used.
• Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed
rights-of-way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site;
arrangement and access provisions for parking areas.
• All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and
buffers.
• The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas.
• A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the
approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site
less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen
trees must be included.
• Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities
intended to serve the site.
• Approximate location of regulated wetlands.
• Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions
on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance
One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be
required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan.
One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
N/A
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 6
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 7
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 8
Legal Description for
Conditional Zoning District
For 2626 Castle Hayne Road
Beginning at a point in the eastern boundary of Castle Hayne Road (U.S. Hwy. 117), a 100’
public right‐of‐way; said point being located southwardly along the right‐of‐way 343.8 feet
from its intersection with the centerline of Sheridan Drive (S.R. 1324), a 50’ public right‐of‐way;
and running thence from the point of beginning:
North 87000’00” East, 150.00 feet to a point; thence
South 03000’00” East, 105.00 feet to a point; thence
South 87000’00” West, 150.00 feet to a point in the eastern boundary of Castle Hayne Road;
thence with that right‐of‐way,
North 03000’00” West, 105.00 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 15,750
Square feet, or 0.362 acres, more or less.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 9
REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY
NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE
FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS
Project Name: Gardenia Lane (2626 Castle Hayne Road)
Proposed Zoning: R-20 to (CZD) CB (0.362)
The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above
zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by
first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on
November 10, 2022 . A copy of that written notice and site layout are also attached.
The meeting was held at the following time and place: Wednesday, November 23rd,
6:00 p.m.; at the property, 2626 Castle Hayne Road.
The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in list
The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief presentation was given on the
intent of the owner / petitioner to renovate the existing structure as an establishment for
women’s services, instructional studio, and crafts retail sales, and the specifics of a conditional
zoning district. The plan was shown parking in the rear yard.
Comments were made about the drainage characteristics around the subject and adjacent
yards. The owner & neighbors agreed to work together to assure minimal impacts.
Overall, the consensus appeared to be support, feeling that it would be an upgrade of the
subject property value and neighborhood aesthetics.
Date: November 27, 2022
Applicant: Design Solutions
By: Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 10
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 11
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 12
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 13
ADJACENT PROPERTIES WITHIN 500' OF 2626 CASTLE HAYNE ROAD:
PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP PROPERTY ADDRESS
ADVANCE STORES CO INC 5008 AIRPORT RD ROANOKE, VA 24012 2609 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
ALHOBISHI C‐STORES & RENTALSI PO BOX 807 SAINT PAULS, NC 28384 2636 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
ALLMAN ALLEN P 2630 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2630 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
ASSURED QUALITY HOLDINGS LLC 201 CAPE FEAR BLVD CAROLINA BEACH, NC 28428 2549 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
B&C WRIGHTSBORO LLC PO BOX 3743 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 2616 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
CLARK CALEB A8 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 8 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON
GOMEZ RAMON GUADALUPE SANCHEZ 5916 SALTEE WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28409 10 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON
HAGER JOHN A ETAL 112 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 112 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON
HUGHES CREDIT SHELTER TRUST 1650 MIL CUTOFF RD STE 200 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 110 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON
HUGHES JOYCE S 5917 MYRTLE GROVE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 2629 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
HUGHES JOYCE S 5917 MYRTLE GROVE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 2625 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
INMAN DAN E MARIE P 130 CARL SEITTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 3512 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON
INMAN DAN E MARIE P 130 CARL SEITTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 3516 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON
JP PORTER LLC 163 VOYAGER WAY HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443 2604 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
MALAVE VINCENT 133 TRIBUTARY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2624 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
MCCANDLESS ELEANOR N 1911 KNOLLWOOD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 12 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON
MCDOWELL SHELVIA S4 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 4 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON
MCGUIRE JERRY 116 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 116 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON
MORTON STEVEN C PATRICIA J 111 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 111 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON
NEW HANOVER COUNTY 230 GOV CENTER DR STE 190 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 2716 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 233 PATTERSON AVE S SPRINGFIELD, MO 65802 2608 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
OUTER RIM ENTERPRISES INC 3508 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON, NC 28405 3508 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PO BOX 5600 BARTLESVILLE, OK 74005 2629 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PO BOX 5600 BARTLESVILLE, OK 74005 2636 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
PLOTNER STANLEY J VANESSA E 225 SATARA DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 2705 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
PRIDGEN MANLEY M II 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON
PRIDGEN MANLEY M II 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON
RCJ HOLDINGS LLC 311 HERMITAGE RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 115 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON
SHORT ANDREW D 3321 AMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 2615 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
WILLIAMS JANET HERRING ETAL 511 ASHLEY PL JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
WILLIAMS SAMANTHA 2701 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2701 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
WRIGHTSBORO PLAZA 111 PRINCESS ST WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2601 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
WRIGHTSBORO PLAZA 111 PRINCESS ST WILMINGTON, NC 28401 2605 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 14
November 10, 2022
To: Adjacent Property Owners
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: Gardenia Lane – a Women’s Boutique & Studio
2626 Castle Hayne Road
My Client is interested in using the existing structure at this address as space for instructional services,
sale of crafts, and a studio for education & activities. Your property is located within the proximity of
the proposed project.
This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A
Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific
standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that
only a specific set of uses, in this case the existing structure and proposed property improvements, of an
approved proposal can be developed.
The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the
tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity
for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements,
benefits and impacts.
A meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 23rd, 6:00 p.m., there at the property location, 2626
Castle Hayne Road.
If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910‐620‐2374, or email
cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project, and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to
the community.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 15
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 7 - 16
Concept Plan
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 9 - 1
Public Comments
In Support X
Neutral X
In Opposition X
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 3 - 10 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/5/2023
Technical Review Commiee Report
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Robert Farrell, Senior Planner
CONTACT(S): Robert Farrell; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Forum
Special Use Permit Request (S22-03) - Request by Thomas Johnson with Skyway Towers, applicant, on behalf of
Kenneth and Eloise Parker, property owners, for a Special Use Permit for a Wireless Support Structure to be
located on an approximately 4.28 acre parcel east of the intersec>on of Planta>on Road and Military Cutoff
Extension which is currently zoned R-15, Residen>al.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant is reques$ng a special use permit to construct and operate a 195' tall wireless support structure on an
approximately 4.28-acre parcel located along Planta$on Road east of the intersec$on of Planta$on Road and Military
Cutoff Extension currently under construc$on. The property is currently undeveloped and is zoned R-15, which allows
wireless support structures with a special use permit.
The wireless support structure, which is designed as a concealed, monopole antenna wireless communica$on facility,
will have a total height of 199 feet when including a 4-foot lightning rod. It will be designed to accommodate four (4)
wireless carriers. Cellular antennae will be placed at heights of 160', 170', 180' and 193'. The tower will be situated
within a 50' x 50' (2,500 sf) fenced-in equipment compound within a 100' x 100' (10,000 sf) lease area with required
buffers and landscaping mee$ng the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Tower illumina$on is
not required.
The UDO requires wireless towers within general residen$al districts to u$lize faux tree stealthing unless the
requirement is exempted by the Board of Commissioners as a condi$on of approval. The proposed tower will be
concealed as a pine tree to match the trees in the surrounding area.
Access to the tower site will be provided through a new 25' wide, 390' long gated gravel access and u$lity easement
from Planta$on Road. Maintenance at the proposed tower is es$mated to generate fewer than five trips per month,
having virtually no impact on traffic on the nearby road network.
The applica$on includes photographic simula$ons from various vantage points in the immediate vicinity that show the
tower's an$cipated visual impact, an affidavit cer$fying that radio frequency emissions will comply with Federal
Communica$ons Commission (FCC) standards, a determina$on from the Federal Avia$on Administra$on (FAA) that
the facility will not be a hazard to air naviga$on, an an impact analysis conducted by a North Carolina cer$fied general
real estate appraiser.
The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the subject property as Community Mixed Use. The intent of this place type
focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development paerns that serve all modes of travel and act as an
aractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recrea$onal,
commercial, ins$tu$onal, and mul$-family and single-family residen$al. While wireless support structures and other
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4
infrastructure are common in contemporary land development paerns, the Comprehensive Plan does not specifically
address their loca$on. However, the Comprehensive Plan's implementa$on guidelines do aim to support business
success, workforce development, and economic prosperity, and telecommunica$ons infrastructure, when placed to
best serve the needs of surrounding residents, businesses, and ins$tu$onal uses, can help to advance those goals.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Intelligent Growth & Economic DevelopmentEncourage development of complete communi$es in the unincorporated
countyIncrease connec$vity of residents to each other and their investment to New Hanover County
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
As a preliminary forum the Planning Board does not make a decision or recommenda$on on special use permits. The
board is requested to hear the presenta$ons of staff, the applicant, and the public to facilitate an open and transparent
discussion of the special use permit applica$on.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip$on
S22-03 Planning Board Script
S22-03 Zoning Map
S22-03 Future Land Use Map
S22-03 Mailout Map
Applicant Materials Cover Sheet
Application Materials
Balloon Test Simulated Imagery
Impact Study
Concept Site Plan
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4
SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application PRELIMINARY FORUM (S22-03)
Request by Thomas Johnson with Skyway Towers, applicant, on behalf of Kenneth and Eloise Parker,
property owners, for a Special Use Permit for a Wireless Communications Facility to be located on an
approximately 4.28-acre parcel east of the intersection of Plantation Road and Military Cutoff
Extension which is currently zoned R-15, Residential.
1. This is a Preliminary Forum. The purpose of this forum is to facilitate an open and transparent discussion of
the special use permit application and to provide an opportunity for public comments and questions. Please
note per state law, the Planning Board will not be making a decision or recommendation this evening. Instead,
the decision on the application will be made during the Board of Commissioners’ quasi-judicial hearing,
where public participation will be limited to parties with standing and witnesses providing evidence through
sworn testimony. Anyone interested in speaking in support or opposition of the project should sign in and
speak tonight at this meeting, regardless of standing in the matter.
2. Staff will introduce the application. Then the applicant will be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation.
Following the applicant’s presentation, we will have 20 minutes for public questions and comments, and then
allow the applicant time to address them. The Board members will then provide their comments and ask
questions of the applicant. At the end, Staff will give an overview of next steps in the special use permit
process. We will then close the forum.
3. Conduct forum as follows:
a. Staff introduction
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Public comments and questions (up to 20 minutes – total supporters and opponents)
d. Applicant response to public comments and questions.
e. Planning Board questions and comments.
f. Staff overview of next steps.
4. Close the Preliminary Forum.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1
SpringerRd
Brittany Pointer
C
t
Flu
s
h
i
n
g
D
r
G o l d e n g r o v e Ln
Covey
Ln
S
e
t
t
e
r
C
t
Q
u
ail
W
o
o
d
s
Rd
Cr
o
o
k
e
d
P
i
n
e
R
d
East b o u r n e D r
SetterLn
PointerLn
Plantation Rd
Wild Mag
n
o
l
i
a
R
d
I-140
SHODIncorporated Areas
Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD)
See Section 5.7 of the UDOCOD
B-1 AC R-5 EDZD
CB I-1 R-7 PD
B-2 I-2 R-10 RMF-X
CS AR R-15 RMFU
SC RA R-20 UMXZ
O&I R-20S
Zoning Districts
R-15Plantation Road near
Military Cutoff Extension
S22-03
Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 1,000500 Feet
Military Cutoff
Extension
SITE
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 1
FlushingDr
Go l d e n g r o v eLnCovey
Ln
Q
u
ail
W
o
o
dsRd
Cr
o
o
k
e
d
P
i
n
e
R
d
East b o u r n e D r
SetterLn
Pointer
Ln
S pringerRd
Plantation Rd
Wild Mag
n
o
l
i
a
R
d
I-140
General
Residential
Conservation
Community Mixed Use
Community
Mixed Use
New Hanover County, NCCONSERVATION
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY MIXED USE
URBAN MIXED USE
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL
EMPLOYMENT CENTER
COMMERCE ZONE
Place Types
R-15Plantation Road near
Military Cutoff Extension
S22-03
Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 1,000500 Feet
Military Cutoff
Extension
SITE
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 3 - 1
Cr
o
o
k
e
d
P
i
n
e
R
d
Qu
ail
W
o
o
d
s
R
d G o l d e n g r o v e LnCovey
Ln
SetterLn
PointerLn
Plantation Rd
Neighboring Parcels (500 feet)
R-15Plantation Road near
Military Cutoff Extension
S22-03
Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case:
0 1,000500 Feet
Military Cutoff
Extension
SITE
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 4 - 1
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 5 - 1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 5 - 2
Page 1 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
This application form must be completed as part of a special use permit application submitted through the countys
online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart
below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the
application, are set out in Section 10.3.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
*If the proposed use is classified as intensive industry, the applicant shall conduct a community information meeting in accordance with Section
10.2.3, Community Information Meeting.
1. Applicant and Property Owner Information
Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent)
Company Company/Owner Name 2
Address Address
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip
Phone Phone
Email Email
Public Hearing Procedures
(Optional)
Pre-Application
Conference
1*
Community Information Meeting
2
Application Submittal & Acceptance
3
Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional)
4
Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification
5
Planning Board Preliminary Forum
6
Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision
7
Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 1
Page 2 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
2. Subject Property Information
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification
3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative
4. Proposed Condition(s)
Please note: Within a special use permit proposal, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater
restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding zoning district regulations may be
added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding
community. Please list any conditions proposed to be included with this special use permit application below. Staff,
the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process that
meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Please list the proposed use(s) of the subject property, and provide the purpose of the special use permit and a
project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary).
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 2
Page 3 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
5. Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version
of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be
completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be
included with this application.
ITE Land Use:
Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.)
AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips:
6. Criteria Required for Approval of a Special Use Permit
A use designated as a special use in a particular zoning district is a use that may be appropriate in the district, but
because of its nature, extent, and external impacts, requires special consideration of its location, design, and methods
of operation before it can be deemed appropriate in the district and compatible with its surroundings. The purpose is
to establish a uniform mechanism for the review of special uses to ensure they are appropriate for the location and
zoning district where they are proposed.
For each of the four required conclusions listed below, include or attach a statement that explains how any existing
conditions, proposed development features, or other relevant facts would allow the Board of County Commissioners to
reach the required conclusion, and attach any additional documents or materials that provide supporting factual
evidence. The considerations listed under each required conclusion are simply those suggested to help the applicant
understand what may be considered in determining whether a required conclusion can be met. Any additional
considerations potentially raised by the proposed use or development should be addressed.
1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed and approved.
Considerations:
Traffic conditions in the vicinity, including the effect of additional traffic on streets and street intersections, and
sight lines at street intersections with curb cuts;
Provision of services and utilities, including sewer, water, electrical, garbage collections, fire protection;
Soil erosion and sedimentation;
Protection of public, community, or private water supplies, including possible adverse effects on surface waters
or groundwater; or
Anticipated air discharges, including possible adverse effects on air quality.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 3
Page 4 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public
necessity.
Considerations:
The relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development,
including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of
operation, etc.).
Whether the proposed development is so necessary to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the
community or County as a whole as to justify it regardless of its impact on the value of adjoining property.
2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 4
Page 5 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in
harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the New Hanover County
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Considerations:
The relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development,
including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of
operation, etc.).
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plans goals, objectives for the various planning areas, its definitions of
the various land use classifications and activity centers, and its locational standards.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 5
Page 6 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the
listed items are included and confirm by initialing under Applicant Initial. If an item is not applicable, mark as
N/A. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review;
Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal.
Application Checklist
Applicant
Initial
This application form, completed and signed
Application fee:
$500; $250 if application pertains to a residential use (i.e., mobile home,
duplex, family child care home).
Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable)
The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the
Planning Board meeting agenda.
The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on the Board
of Commissioners meeting agenda.
Conceptual Site Plan including the following minimum elements:
Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads
Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements
o For residential uses, this shall include number, height, and type of units;
area to be occupied by each structure; and/or subdivided boundaries.
o For non-residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage
and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy, and the
specific purposes for which it will be used.
Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights-of-
way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement
and access provisions for parking areas.
All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and
buffering.
The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas.
The approximate location of regulated wetlands.
A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate
location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the
exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included.
Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on
development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district
regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by Federal or
State law or local ordinance.
Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed special use permit
(Ref. Section 10.3.5, as applicable)
Applications for uses in the intensive industry category must also submit:
Community meeting written summary
A list of any local, state, or federal permits required for use
One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be
required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan.
One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans
For wireless support structures or substantial modifications, the elements listed on the
attached checklist
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 6
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 7
Page 7 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
7. Acknowledgement and Signatures
By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the special use
permit for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I
understand that I have the burden of proving that the proposal meets the four required conclusions. I certify that
this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief.
If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions
on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on
my behalf to:
1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials;
2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments;
3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with
or arising out of this application; and
4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval.
Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s)
Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name
Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is
required for each owner of record.
The landowner or their attorney must be present for the application at the preliminary forum and public
hearing.
If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice
has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is
requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are
under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule
as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required.
Thomas H. Johnson, Jr. atty for Applicant
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 8
Page 8 of 8
Special Use Permit Application Updated 02-2022
Telecommunications Requirements Checklist
Requirements for Wireless Support Structures & Substantial Modifications Applicant
Initial
Affidavit certifying the construction and placement of wireless facilities meets the provisions of the Federal
Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 332, as amended, section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012, 47 U.S.C. § 1455 (a), in accordance with the rules promulgated by the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws.
Simulated photographic evidence of the proposed appearance of the wireless support structure and
wireless facilities from at least four (4) vantage points and a statement as to the potential visual and
aesthetic impacts on all adjacent residential zoning district.
Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, or other applicable determination by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) upon review of FAA Form 7460.
For New Wireless Support Structures: Information or materials providing evidence that collocating
new antennae and equipment on an existing wireless support structure or structures within the applicants
search ring is not reasonably feasible. Per NCGS 160D-933, collocation on an existing wireless support
structure is not reasonably feasible if the collocation is technically or commercially impractical or the owner
of the existing wireless support structure is unwilling to enter into a contract for such use at fair market value.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 9
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 10
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 1 of 7
Below are the applicants statements (bold text) describing how the proposed wireless
communication facility (monopole) complies with the use-specific standards contained in UDO
Section 4.3.3(C) Communication and Information Facilities (shown in italics below).
C. Communication and Information Facilities
[09-08-2020] [03-21-2022]
1. General Requirements for All Communication and Information Facilities.
The following standards shall apply to all communications and information facilities:
a. Setbacks
The following setback requirements shall apply to all communication and information
facilities except for Amateur radio antenna below 90 feet in height, which are exempt from
these requirements in accordance with NCGS 160D-905.
1. Residential Districts
The minimum setback for wireless facilities located in general residential districts (RA,
AR, R-20, R-20S, R-15, R-10, R-7, or R- 5), multi-family districts, and residentially
designated portions of master planned developments shall be a distance equal to the
height of the wireless facility, as measured from the base of the wireless facility to the
tallest point, including lightning rods or similar appurtenances.
As shown on the plans included as part of the application the proposed tower is 199 tall,
inclusive of a 4 -tall lightning rod. The setbacks for the proposed tower depicted on Sheet
Z-1 range from 212.0 to 270.0 , which exceed the minimum requirement.
2. All Other Districts
The minimum setback for wireless facilities located in all other districts shall be equal
to each facilitys engineered fall zone, as established by a letter sealed by a licensed
professional engineer certifying that the wireless facility will not exceed the distance
specified in the letter should the wireless facility fail. Where an engineered fall zone
certification is not submitted, wireless facilities shall be set back a distance equal
to the height of the wireless facility, as measured from the base of the wireless facility
to the tallest point, including lightning rods or similar appurtenances.
This requirement is not applicable since the proposed tower is located in the R-15 district.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 11
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 2 of 7
b. Certification Required
All applicants seeking approval shall also submit a written affidavit from a qualified person
or persons, including evidence of their qualifications, certifying that the construction or
placement of such structures meets the provisions of the Federal Communications Act,
47 U.S.C. § 332, as amended, section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012, 47 U.S.C. § 1455 (a), in accordance with the rules promulgated by
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and all other applicable federal, state,
and local laws. The statement must certify that radio frequency emissions from the
antenna array(s) comply with the FCC standards. The statement shall also certify that
both individually and cumulatively the proposed facilities located on or adjacent to the
proposed facility will comply with current FCC standards. In accordance with NCGS
160D-932, the county cannot base its permitting decision on public safety implications of
radio frequency emissions of wireless facilities.
The applicant has submitted the required certification, attached to the special use permit
application as Exhibit B.
c. Expert Review
Outside experts and disputes are subject to the following provisions:
1. Siting of telecommunications facilities may involve complex technical issues that
require review and input by outside experts. Staff may require the applicant to pay
the reasonable costs of a third-party technical study or a proposed facility. Selection
of expert(s) to review the proposal shall be at the sole discretion of the decision-
making body.
2. If the applicant for a telecommunications facility claims that one or more standards of
this ordinance are inconsistent with federal law as applied to a particular property, or
would prohibit the effective provision of wireless communications within the relevant
market area, the decision-making body may require that the applications be reviewed
by a qualified engineer for a determination of the accuracy of such claims. Any costs
shall be charged to the applicant.
The applicant acknowledges these provisions.
d. Signage
Signage shall comply with the following standards:
1. Attaching commercial messages for off-site or on-site advertising shall be prohibited.
2. The only signage that is permitted upon an antenna, wireless support structure,
equipment cabinet, or fence shall be information and for the purpose of identifying:
i. The antenna support structure (such as ASR registration number);
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 12
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 3 of 7
ii. The party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the facility;
iii. Its current address and telephone number;
iv. Security or safety signs;
v. Property manager signs for the tower (if applicable); and
vi. Signage appropriate to warn the general public as to the use of the facility for
radiofrequency transmissions.
The applicant acknowledges these standards; details pertaining to signage required to
be posted on the tower site in compliance with these standards is depicted on Sheet S-1
of the plans.
2. Amateur Radio Antenna
Except for in the I-1 and I-2 districts, Amateur Radio Antenna 90 feet in height or taller, in
addition to the standards set forth in Subsection 4.3.3.C.1 above, shall require a
Special Use Permit and are subject to the standards of 4.3.3.C.6 below.
This requirement is not applicable since the proposed tower will not be used as an amateur
radio antenna.
3. Antenna & Towers Ancillary to the Principal Use
Except for in the I-1 and I-2 districts, Antenna & Towers 70 feet in height or taller, in addition
to the standards set forth in Subsection 4.3.3.C.1 above, shall require a Special Use Permit
and are subject to the standards of 4.3.3.C.6 below.
Since the subject property is currently vacant, the proposed tower is not ancillary to a
principal use; according to UDO Table 4.2-1, a special use permit is required for the
proposed tower since it is located in the R-15 zoning district and complies, as described in
this narrative, with the applicable standards of UDO Sections 4.3.3.C.1 and 4.3.3.C.6.
4. Collocations (sub-sections a c).
As shown on the plans included with the special use permit application, the request is for
approval to construct a monopole tower with a single carrier installation at this time. The
applicant acknowledges the standards and requirements of this sub-Section 4.3.3(C)(4)(a)
(c) and these may apply to future requests for colocation of equipment on this tower.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 13
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 4 of 7
5. Non-Substantial Modification
a. The applicant is encouraged to provide simulated photographic evidence of the proposed
appearance of non-substantial modification and a statement as to the potential visual and
aesthetic impacts on all adjacent residential zoning districts. The simulation should
include overall height; configuration; physical location; mass and scale; material and color
(including proposals for steel structures); and illumination.
The applicant acknowledges this criteria may apply to future requests associated with this
tower that are considered a non-substantial modification.
b. Concealed (stealth) or camouflaged facilities are encouraged when the method of
concealment is appropriate to the proposed location. Stealth facilities may include but are
not limited to: painted antenna and feed lines to match the color of a building or structure,
faux windows, dormers, or other architectural features that blend with an existing or
proposed building or structure. Freestanding stealth facilities typically have a secondary,
obvious function such as a church steeple, windmill, silo, light standard, flagpole,
bell/clock tower, water tower, or tree.
This criteria is not applicable since the proposed tower is a monopole design.
6. Other Wireless Communication Facilities including New Wireless Support Structures &
Substantial Modifications
a. Standards for All New Wireless Support Structures and Substantial Modifications
The following standards shall apply to all wireless support structures and substantial
modifications:
1. A landscaped buffer with a base width not less than 25 feet and providing 100 percent
opacity shall be required within the wireless support structure site to screen the exterior
of protective fencing or walls. The base station and equipment compound of the
wireless support structure and each guy wire anchor must be surrounded by a fence
or wall not less than eight feet in height.
Sheet L-1 of the plans included with the special use permit application depict a landscape
buffer of width and opacity planting standards that comply with this requirement.
2. All wireless support structures shall be constructed to accommodate collocation.
Structures over 150 feet in height shall be engineered to accommodate at a minimum
two additional providers. Structures 150 feet or less in height shall be engineered to
accommodate at a minimum one additional provider.
The proposed tower is greater than 150 in height; Sheet C-2 of the plans included with
the special use permit application depict space on the tower for three (3) additional
providers.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 14
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 5 of 7
3. Equipment compounds shall comply with the following standards:
i. Shall not be used for the storage of any equipment or hazardous waste (e.g.,
discarded batteries) or materials not needed for the operation. No outdoor storage
yards shall be allowed in a tower equipment compound.
ii. Shall not be used as a habitable space.
The applicant acknowledges these standards; the tower equipment compound will be
maintained in accordance with all applicable requirements and regulations.
4. The applicant shall submit Form 7460 to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
assure compliance with all FAA standards and to resolve issues of concern, including
required lighting, possible transmission interference or other conflicts when the
proposed wireless support structure site is located within 10,000 feet of an airport or
within any runway approach zone.
The applicant has submitted the required certification, attached to the special use permit
application as Exhibit C.
b. Additional Standards for New Wireless Support Structures and Substantial Modifications
Allowed By-Right
The following standards shall apply to wireless support structures and substantial
modifications allowed by-right:
1. Except in the I-1 and I-2 districts, wireless support structures shall be monopole or
unipole construction; guyed or lattice-type towers are prohibited.
2. Except in the I-1 and I-2 districts, all wireless equipment, including any feed lines,
antennas, and accessory equipment, must be enclosed in the tower cannister,
camouflaged, screened, obscured, mounted flush, or otherwise not readily apparent
to a casual observer.
The proposed tower complies with the above standards/requirements; it is located within
the R-15 district and is a monopole design.
c. Additional Standards for New Wireless Support Structures and Substantial Modifications
Requiring Special Use Permits
Where Special Use Permits are required, all of the following standards shall be applied,
and all requirements must be met. Additional conditions may be determined to mitigate
negative impacts, and the permit should be approved only if all negative impacts can be
mitigated.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 15
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 6 of 7
1. The applicant shall provide evidence that collocating new antennae and equipment
on an existing wireless support structure or structures within the applicants search
ring is not reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, collocation on an
existing wireless support structure is not reasonably feasible if the collocation is
technically or commercially impractical or the owner of the existing wireless support
structure is unwilling to enter into a contract for such use at fair market value.
The applicant has submitted evidence (signed affidavit) attached to the special use permit
application as Exhibit D as evidence regarding the applicants search ring for the subject
site.
2. The applicant shall conduct a balloon test prior to the submittal of simulated
photographic evidence of the proposed appearance of the wireless support structure
and wireless facilities. The applicant shall arrange to raise a colored balloon no less
than three (3) feet in diameter at the maximum height of the proposed wireless
support structure. The balloon test shall provide the basis for simulated photographic
evidence from four vantage points and a statement as to the potential visual and
aesthetic impacts on all adjacent residential zoning districts. The simulation shall
include overall height; configuration; physical location; mass and scale; materials and
color (including proposals for stealth structures); and illumination.
The applicant retained a contractor to conduct the required balloon test to complete
photo simulations to be submitted as part of the special use permit application. Due to
unfavorable weather conditions that precluded test results needed to prepare the
required photographic evidence, the applicant was unable to include the photo
simulations at the time of submitting the special use permit application. The applicant
will submit simulations once weather conditions permit the contractor to conduct the test
in favorable environment to facilitate accurate results.
3. Wireless support structures shall be monopole or unipole construction; guyed or
lattice-type towers are prohibited.
As shown on the plans included with the special use permit application, the proposed
tower is a monopole design.
4. All wireless equipment, including any feed lines, antennas, and accessory equipment,
must be enclosed in the tower cannister, camouflaged, screened, obscured,
mounted flush, or otherwise not readily apparent to a casual observer.
The proposed tower and associated ground compound will comply with this requirement.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 16
EXHIBIT A: APPLICANTS NARRATIVE (COMPLIANCE WITH UDO SECTION 4.3.3)
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Page 7 of 7
5. Wireless support structures located within general residential districts (RA, AR, R-20,
R-20S, R-15, R-10, R-7, or R-5) shall be required to utilize faux tree stealthing except
where a structure is proposed in an area containing such dense existing tree clusters
that the structure is not visible from existing single-family or duplex residential uses
and/or platted lots located within a general residential district. Faux structures shall
be designed to match a species of tree located within the existing cluster of trees in
which a structure is proposed.
i. A wireless support structure may be exempted from this requirement only by the
Board of Commissioners as a condition of approval on the special use permit.
As part of consideration of the special use permit, the applicant requests the Board of
Commissioners permit, as provided under this subsection, the proposed monopole
design as shown on the plans included with the special use permit application in place
of the faux tree stealthing requirement. As described in the applicants responses to the
review criteria on the special use permit application, the monopole design's appearance
with respect to the color and overall mass of the tower/antennas in combination will
minimize visual impact on the surrounding area in comparison to a faux tree design,
and be less visually contrasting against the background/sky with respect to the color
and overall mass of the tower/antennas in combination. Also, the proposed tower is
located at an interchange where tall structures such as area lights for road lighting are
located.
d. Standards for Nonconforming Wireless Support Structures (sub-sections 1 2).
The requested special use permit is for a new tower on the property that complies with the
applicable standards and requirements of the UDO in effect at the time of application
submittal.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 17
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 18
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
EXHIBIT C:
FAA DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION
9/26/22, (4 Pages)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 19
Mail Processing Center
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
10101 Hillwood Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76177
Aeronautical Study No.
2022-ASO-7222-OE
Page 1 of 4
Issued Date: 09/26/2022
Operations
Skyway Towers, LLC
3637 Madaca Lane
Tampa, FL 33618
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure: Antenna Tower NC-08899 Murraysville - TWR - NON C-BAND
Location: Wilmington, NC
Latitude: 34-18-11.66N NAD 83
Longitude: 77-49-27.09W
Heights: 42 feet site elevation (SE)
199 feet above ground level (AGL)
241 feet above mean sea level (AMSL)
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met:
Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking/
lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed in accordance with FAA Advisory
circular 70/7460-1 M.
This determination expires on 03/26/2024 unless:
(a) the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration, is received by this office.
(b) extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(c) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within
6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 20
Page 2 of 4
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power, except
those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best
Practices, effective 21 Nov 2007, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including
increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA.This
determination includes all previously filed frequencies and power for this structure.
If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after
the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) because the
structure is subject to their licensing authority.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (404) 305-6504, or dale.kimmel@faa.gov. On any
future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2022-ASO-7222-OE.
Signature Control No: 513784749-554868478 ( DNE )
Dale Kimmel
Specialist
Attachment(s)
Frequency Data
Map(s)
cc: FCC
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 21
Page 3 of 4
Frequency Data for ASN 2022-ASO-7222-OE
LOW
FREQUENCY
HIGH
FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY
UNIT ERP
ERP
UNIT
6 7 GHz 55 dBW
6 7 GHz 42 dBW
10 11.7 GHz 55 dBW
10 11.7 GHz 42 dBW
17.7 19.7 GHz 55 dBW
17.7 19.7 GHz 42 dBW
21.2 23.6 GHz 55 dBW
21.2 23.6 GHz 42 dBW
614 698 MHz 1000 W
614 698 MHz 2000 W
698 806 MHz 1000 W
806 901 MHz 500 W
806 824 MHz 500 W
824 849 MHz 500 W
851 866 MHz 500 W
869 894 MHz 500 W
896 901 MHz 500 W
901 902 MHz 7 W
929 932 MHz 3500 W
930 931 MHz 3500 W
931 932 MHz 3500 W
932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW
935 940 MHz 1000 W
940 941 MHz 3500 W
1670 1675 MHz 500 W
1710 1755 MHz 500 W
1850 1910 MHz 1640 W
1850 1990 MHz 1640 W
1930 1990 MHz 1640 W
1990 2025 MHz 500 W
2110 2200 MHz 500 W
2305 2360 MHz 2000 W
2305 2310 MHz 2000 W
2345 2360 MHz 2000 W
2496 2690 MHz 500 W
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 22
Page 4 of 4
Sectional Map for ASN 2022-ASO-7222-OE
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 23
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 24
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
EXHIBIT E:
COVERAGE ANALYSIS
8/9/22, (4 Pages)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 25
Co
v
e
r
a
g
e
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
f
o
r
Z
o
n
i
n
g
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
Au
g
u
s
t
9
,
2
0
2
2
T-
M
o
b
i
l
e
C
o
n
f
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 26
2
2
T-
M
o
b
i
l
e
C
o
n
f
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
:
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
On
A
i
r
Ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
Co
v
e
r
a
g
e
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
Th
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
i
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
L
a
t
L
o
n
g
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
34
.
3
0
3
2
3
9
8
-
7
7
.
8
2
4
1
9
2
8
Of
f
l
o
a
d
C
e
l
l
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 27
3
3
T-
M
o
b
i
l
e
C
o
n
f
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
C
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
-
B
e
f
o
r
e
C
a
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
3
On
A
i
r
Ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
Co
v
e
r
a
g
e
LT
E
R
S
R
P
T
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
Of
f
l
o
a
d
C
e
l
l
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 28
4
4
T-
M
o
b
i
l
e
C
o
n
f
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
4
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
wi
l
l
b
e
a
n
Ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
T
-
Mo
b
i
l
e
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
h
e
l
p
to
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
a
r
o
u
n
d
Jo
h
n
J
a
y
B
u
r
n
e
y
J
r
F
w
y
(H
w
y
-
1
4
0
)
,
M
u
r
r
a
y
v
i
l
l
e
R
d
,
Si
d
b
u
r
y
R
d
,
P
l
a
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
d
,
Ol
d
P
l
a
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
d
,
Y
v
o
n
n
e
Rd
,
W
a
l
m
a
r
t
S
u
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
Lo
w
e
s
H
o
m
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
am
o
n
g
o
t
h
e
r
s
.
I
n
o
t
h
e
r
wo
r
d
s
,
a
l
l
c
e
l
l
s
i
t
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
ma
x
i
m
u
m
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
ph
o
n
e
/
d
a
t
a
c
a
l
l
s
i
t
c
a
n
t
a
k
e
on
a
n
y
g
i
v
e
n
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
ne
w
s
i
t
e
5
W
I
0
6
0
0
A
w
i
l
l
he
l
p
o
f
f
l
o
a
d
t
h
e
s
e
c
a
l
l
s
fr
o
m
n
e
a
r
b
y
s
i
t
e
s
5W
I
0
5
2
0
A
3
,
5
W
I
0
5
4
3
B
3
an
d
5
W
I
0
5
5
1
B
1
.
He
i
g
h
t
h f 5 a
An
t
e
n
n
a
C
e
n
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
19
5
F
e
e
t
Az
i
m
u
t
h
0-
1
1
0
-
2
0
0
On
A
i
r
Ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
Co
v
e
r
a
g
e
LT
E
R
S
R
P
T
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
5W
I
0
6
0
0
A
C
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
-
A
f
t
e
r
C
a
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 29
BALLOON PHOTO PRESENTATION
Skyway Towers LLC
Wireless Communications Facility Balloon Tether Documentation
On October 6, 2022, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP), on behalf of Skyway Towers, LLC, completed a Balloon Test for a proposed 195-ft AGL (199-ft overall with appurtenances) monopole communications tower to be
located south of a portion of Plantation Road, in Wilmington, NC at latitude: N 34° 18’ 11.6634”, longitude: W 77° 49’
27.0943” (NAD 83). The site elevation is approximately 42.0 ft AMSL. On Thursday, October 6, 2022, TEP deployed
an orange, approximately 5-ft diameter, CloudbusterTM balloon at 195-ft above ground level (to top of balloon) from
approximately 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. EDT. The weather at the time of the balloon flight was clear skies, with good visibility, and approximately 79 degrees Fahrenheit with calm winds & intermittent 3 to 6 mph gusts. Photographs
were taken by Tucker Pridgen of TEP with a Nikon D3200 digital camera. Photographs were taken from numerous
public-accessible locations within a 2/3-mile radius of the proposed tower site in an attempt to depict the visibility of
the proposed tower from nearby areas.
The tower as simulated is at One Hundred and Ninety-Five Feet (195 feet in height/altitude) plus a 4 foot lightning
rod at the top. The overall height above ground at the centerline of the proposed tower facility is One Hundred and
Ninety-Nine Feet (199 feet in height/altitude).
The satellite imagery is from May, 2022.
Where the tower is not visible, a colored outline of the tower is shown to indicate the size and position of the proposed
tower.
Michael P. SaMPair’S Technical GraPhicS ServiceS
PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTY SERVICES TO THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY
Indicates Tower
Not Visible
Shows Tower
at full specification
Page 1 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 1
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
Page 2 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 2
½ MILE
TOWER
1NV
2NV
3NV4
5
6
7
NV
NV - Not Visible
1 - Not Visible. Looking south by southwest towards site from HWY 140 (John Jay Burney Jr Fwy). (2,872 ft, 0.54 mi)
2 - Not Visible. Looking west by southwest towards site from Plantation Rd just west of Old Plantation Rd. (1,448 ft, 0.27 mi)
3 - Not Visible. Looking west by northwest from Yvonne Rd in front of Greeks Farm gate.. (3,906 ft, 0.74 mi)
4 - Looking north by northeast towards site just east of Murrayville Rd. (2,190 ft, 0.42 mi)
5 - Looking east towards site from Flushing Dr at Cameron Trace Dr. (4,072 ft, 0.77 mi)
6 - Looking southeast towards site from HWY 140 (John Jay Burney Jr Fwy) looking across Wild Magnolia Rd. (4,519 ft, 0.86 mi)
7 - Looking south by southeast towards site from Plantation Rd just east of Crooked Pine Rd. (367 ft, 0.07 mi)
NV = Not Visible
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
Page 3 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 3
½ MILE
TOWER
1NV
2NV
3NV4
5
6
7
NV
NV - Not Visible
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
Page 4 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 4
TOWER
1NV
NV-Not Visible
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 1
Page 5 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 5
TOWER
2NV
NV-Not Visible
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 2
Page 6 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 6
TOWER
3NV
NV-Not Visible
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 3
Page 7 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 7
TOWER
4
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 4
Page 8 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 8
TOWER
4
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
SIMULAtEd VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 4
Page 9 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 9
TOWER5
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 5
Page 10 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 10
TOWER5
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
SIMULAtEd VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 5
Page 11 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 11
TOWER
6 N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 6
Page 12 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 12
TOWER
6 N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
SIMULAtEd VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 6
Page 13 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 13
TOWER 7
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 7
Page 14 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 14
TOWER 7
N
NC-08899, MURRAYVILLE
PLANtAtIoN RoAd
WILMINgtoN, NC
toWER SIMULAtIoNS
SIMULAtEd VIEW FRoM LoCAtIoN 7
Page 15 of 15 • revision 20221010-1748Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 15
(NH-003)
IMPACT STUDY
Impact Study - Cell Tower
Plantation Road
Murrayville, New Hanover
County, North Carolina 28409
Type Report: Impact Study
Effective Date
October 9, 2022
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 1
(NH-003)
Real Prope rty Appraise rs an d Consul tants
1100 Sund ance D rive, Concord, North Carolina 28027
Telephone: 704-605-0595
October 18, 2022
Mr. Thomas H. Johnson
Attorney
Williams Mullen
301 Fayetteville Street
Suite 1700
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Impact Study for Proposed Telecommunications Facility located on Plantation Road,
Murrayville, New Hanover County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I have completed a study of the proposed tower. The scope of the assignment is to provide an
analysis and conclusions addressing items within my field of expertise associated with the issuance
of a special use permit for the proposed development. A special use permit includes four findings
of fact, of which two are addressed in this analysis. Details of these items are contained within this
report.
The location of the proposed tower is on a property owned by Kenneth and Eloise Parker, Sr.
according to the New Hanover County GIS. The site consists of 4.28 acres and is currently vacant.
The site is zone R15, Residential consistent with surrounding properties. The surrounding land
uses are low-density residential and agricultural. The most pertinent factor to the conclusions of
the study is the US 17 Hampstead Bypass infrastructure project that is currently under construction.
We provide details of this project in the attached study.
The impact study is intended to conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP), the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice of the Appraisal Institute. The impact study is not an appraisal for several reasons
including but not necessarily limited to the scope of work of the study that does not include a
quantification of the impact if any in accordance with the New Hanover County criteria for the
special use permit. The impact study does employ appraisal methodologies in determining the
impact id any on adjacent or abutting properties.
The conclusions of this study are supported by the data and reasoning set forth in the attached
narrative. Your attention is invited to the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions section of this
report. The analysts certify that we have no present or contemplated future interest in the proposed
development, and that our fee for this assignment is in no way contingent upon the conclusions of
this study.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 2
Tom Johnson
October 18, 2022
Page 2
(NH-003)
EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS AND HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS:
It is an extraordinary assumption of this report that the improvements as described within this
report are compliant with the appropriate ordinance including but not necessarily limited to
setbacks, landscaping, access, and other items outside our field of expertise for this assignment.
These items will be addressed as part of the application by others with expertise within the
respective fields.
It is an extraordinary assumption of this report that the proposed development will be constructed
as detailed in the report. Further, it is an assumption of the study that the proposed access will be
in accordance with all local and state regulations. Maintenance will occur through a non-exclusive
easement that we assume is a legal access. Given access will be required for the development, we
consider the assumption reasonable for the purpose and intended use of this report.
The content and conclusions of this report are intended for our client and for the specified intended
uses only. They are also subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions as well as the specific
extraordinary assumption set forth in this report.
It is our opinion that the proposed development will not substantially injure the values of adjacent
or abutting properties and that the proposed development is in harmony with the area in which it
is to be located.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions or comments, please
contact our office.
Sincerely yours,
MICHAEL P. BERKOWITZ
MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 3
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 5 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT ....................................................................................................................... 6
PREMISES OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................................................. 7
Identification of Subject..................................................................................................................................... 7
Client, Purpose, and Intended Use and Intended Users ..................................................................................... 7
Analyst ............................................................................................................................................................... 7
Property Inspection ............................................................................................................................................ 7
Extraordinary Assumptions of Report ............................................................................................................... 7
Effective Date of Study...................................................................................................................................... 8
Date of Report.................................................................................................................................................... 8
Type Report ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
Study Development and Reporting Process ....................................................................................................... 8
PROPOSED FACILITY ...................................................................................................................................... 9
Tower ................................................................................................................................................................. 9
Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................................. 9
Access .............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Location ........................................................................................................................................................... 12
SURROUNDING LAND USES ......................................................................................................................... 12
NEW HANOVER UDO ..................................................................................................................................... 13
MARKET RESEARCH ..................................................................................................................................... 16
Qualitative Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 28
ADDENDA .......................................................................................................................................................... 31
Certification ..................................................................................................................................................... 32
Qualifications of the Analyst ........................................................................................................................... 40
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 4
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 6 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
SCOPE OF THE
ASSIGNMENT
In accordance with our agreement with the client, this impact
study is specific to the needs of our client as part of an
application for a special use permit to be considered by New
Hanover County Officials. Our study and the reporting of our
study is in agreement with our client as follows:
The proposed development requires a Special Use Permit. The
report is intended to address items relevant to the issuance of
a special use permit. The following ‘Findings of Fact” was
extracted from the New Hanover County Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO).
The scope of the assignment includes research of existing
towers in New Hanover County. The neighborhoods and their
surrounding developments are researched to determine
whether the proposed development, referred to as the “The
Murrayville Site”, is consistent with the location of other
towers in the area and their impact, if any, on neighborhood
development patterns and property values.
The impact study provides an analysis of the surrounding
properties. The analysis includes existing improvements,
zoning designations and likely development patterns. The
existing uses as of the effective date of this report in concert
with the market data provided are contributing factors to the
conclusions of this study.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 5
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 7 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
PREMISES OF THE STUDY
Identification of Subject The Murrayville Site
Plantation Road
Murrayville, New Hanover County, NC 28409
New Hanover County Tax Parcel: R02800-004-012-001
Client, Purpose, and
Intended Use and Intended
Users
Mr. Thomas H. Johnson
Attorney
Williams Mullen
301 Fayetteville Street
Suite 1700
Raleigh, NC 27601
The client and intended user are Mr. Tom Johnson. The
intended use is as an aid to assist New Hanover County
officials in rendering a decision regarding the issuance of a
special use permit for the proposed development. The study
is not intended for any other use or users.
Analyst Michael P. Berkowitz
MPB Real Estate, LLC
1100 Sundance Drive
Concord, NC 28027
Property Inspection Michael Berkowitz inspected the property and neighborhood
surrounding the proposed development. Details of
surrounding land uses, and observations are provided
throughout the report. I also performed off site visual
inspections of several towers located in New Hanover County.
I consider the observations in the context of the market data.
They are a contributing factor to the conclusions. Photographs
of the property were taken during Mr. Berkowitz’s inspection.
Extraordinary
Assumptions of Report
It is an extraordinary assumption of this report that the
improvements as described within this report are compliant
with the appropriate ordinance including but not necessarily
limited to setbacks, landscaping, access, and other items
outside our field of expertise for this assignment. These items
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 6
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 8 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
will be addressed as part of the application by others with
expertise within the respective fields.
It is an extraordinary assumption of this report that the
proposed development will be constructed as detailed in the
report. Further, it is an assumption of the study that the
proposed access will be in accordance with all local and state
regulations. Maintenance will occur through a non-exclusive
easement that we assume is a legal access. Given access will
be required for the development, we consider the assumption
reasonable for the purpose and intended use of this report.
These items will be addressed as part of the application by
others with expertise within the respective fields.
Should the extraordinary assumptions not exist, we reserve the
right to amend this study.
Effective Date of Study October 9, 2022
Date of Report October 18, 2022
Type Report Impact Study Report
Study Development and
Reporting Process
In preparing this study, the analyst:
Analyzes physical affects, if any, of the proposed
construction on properties in the immediate area as well as
the neighborhood;
Reviews plans for the proposed development to determine
whether it is in compliance with the New Hanover County
UDO with respect to items within my field of expertise;
Reviews site plan provided by our client with respect to
the physical characteristics of the proposed development;
Researches market data around existing cell towers in
New Hanover County to determine whether the proposed
development is consistent with other developments in the
area.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 7
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 9 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
PROPOSED FACILITY
Tower Based on information provided to the analyst, the proposed
tower will consist of a 195-foot “monopole” communications
tower. The survey appears to show that access to the tower
will be provided by a proposed driveway for the property. The
following site plan shows the proposed site.
SITE PLAN
Site Improvements The site improvements include a seven-foot chain link fence
with three strands of barbed wire. The site improvements will
include a 25-foot-wide landscaping buffer. Based on our
review of the New Hanover UDO, the site improvements meet
the requirements for the development.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 8
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 10 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
LANDSCAPING PLAN
Access According to the site plan, the access to the site will be via a
25-foot-wide utility/access easement extending from
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 9
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 11 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Plantation Road, which runs along the northern boundary of
the subject. The access road will be twelve feet wide and run
along the eastern boundary and turn into the center of the site
which will be the location of the tower. The following exhibit
was extracted from the site plan. Plantation Road is a gravel
Road that will likely be improved with the construction of the
bypass, which is under construction as of the effective date of
this study.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 10
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 12 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Location The tower will be located close to the center of the site.
According to the plans, a significant portion of the site is
identified as wetlands. We assume the proposed development
will adhere to any restrictions associat4ed with this
designation. Along the western boundary of the subject is a
proposed off ramp from the bypass, which is under
construction. The proximity of the new highway is a factor in
the conclusions of this study.
The subject has a zoning designation of R-15, Residential
District. In the New Hanover UDO, we found that this
designation is intended to insure for orderly residential
development in areas without access to municipal water and
sanitary sewer service. The majority of the properties in the
immediate area including all of the adjacent or abutting
properties have the same designation.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The proposed development is on a 4.28-acre tract of vacant
land that is encumbered with wetlands. The location adjacent
to the off ramp for the bypass will influence future
development patterns along the corridor. Based on
information from the Hanover County GIS, all the adjacent or
abutting properties are vacant land. The absence of access to
a paved road in conjunction with the presence of wetlands are
likely the two most significant factors influencing the absence
of development in the immediate area.
As we will discuss in the following section, the scope of the
assignment is to determine whether the proposed development
is in accordance with the New Hanover County UDO
regarding the issuance of a special use permit and the
development of wireless telecommunications facilities. The
items within our field of expertise are detailed in the following
section.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 11
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 13 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
NEW HANOVER UDO
As part of the assignment, I reviewed Article VI Section 63.5
of the New Hanover UDO regarding the development of
Telecommunication Facilities. I also reviewed Article VII of
the UDO regarding the findings of fact associated with the
approval or denial of a special use permit. The following was
extracted from the ordinance Section 70-7.
Item 1 – This item is outside my field of expertise.
Item 2 – It is our understanding, this will be performed and
reviewed by local officials in concert with our client.
Item 3 – The development, if completed as proposed, will not
substantially injure the value of abutting land. This is the focal
point of the remainder of the study.
Item 4 – The development, if completed as proposed, from an
appraiser’s perspective is in harmony with the area in which
it is to be located. This item is addressed in concert with the
analysis from Item 3.
Based on our review of the ordinance, the remainder of the
study focuses on adjoining or abutting properties and
potentially injurious effect of the special use on value. The
land uses for the area include vacant land. The following
analysis is based on the potential visual impact of the
proposed development on the respective abutting properties.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 12
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 14 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The following aerial provides and overview of the immediate
area.
As shown on the aerial, the adjacent or abutting properties are
vacant land. Some of the properties are heavily wooded, while
the subject and the property immediately to the east are mostly
cleared. To the southwest of the subject are a residential
development with some dwellings constructed over the past
few years.
The development of the Hampstead Bypass is in two phases
and poses the most significant influence on development
patterns in the immediate area. The project was awarded for
construction in January 2022. The interchange of the bypass
and I-140 to the north of the subject is the largest interchange
of the proposed corridor. The off ramp to I-140 from the
bypass will run along the western boundary of the subject. A
knowledgeable buyer of any property would be aware of the
infrastructure project and consider the increase in
transportation linkage in the purchase price of any property.
The following map was extracted from the NCDOT website.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 13
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 15 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
We will discuss property values later in the report. We
acknowledge that the proposed 195-foot tower will be visible
from the surrounding properties. The landscaping buffer will
to the extent possible screen the base of the tower from all o f
the surrounding properties.
Summary The items within our field of expertise focus on the aesthetic
impact of the proposed development. This is based on the
surrounding development patterns as detailed earlier in the
study. The limited utility of the subject and the highway under
construction are factors in the analysis.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 14
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 16 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
MARKET RESEARCH
A potential issue associated with the impact of the proposed
development is on property values in the immediate vicinity
and the neighborhood. We researched towers in Wilmington
and the surrounding area and identify the development
patterns around these towers. After analyzing the market data,
we compare this information to the proposed site and the
physical characteristics and development patterns
surrounding the proposed development.
New Hanover County
Towers
During our research, we observed several towers in New
Hanover County. Most of the towers found were in
established commercial or industrial areas. Towers are
classified as comparable for a variety of reasons including but
not necessarily limited to:
Location – The proposed location is in a rural area of
the county with the most of the land being vacant.
Surrounding Developments – The surrounding
developments include vacant land with some low
density residential in the immediate area.
Construction Type/Height – The proposed tower is a
monopole tower with a proposed height of 195 feet.
For the research of towers, we rely on information from
antennasearch.com, which we consider a reliable source of
information. Our search revealed 49 towers within a three-
mile radius of Plantation Road. We excluded towers listed that
were part of electrical transmission lines, which is
inconsistent with the proposed tower. Some of the towers
were not visible during our tour of the area. We also excluded
the towers over 250 feet which require lighting. We have also
included towers researched for a previous study in
Wilmington. The following chart provides a summary of the
towers studied in the area.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 15
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 17 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
After researching the towers in the area, several of the towers
are located on commercial or industrial properties. This
limited the number of towers for comparison. The towers
located in rural areas of the county did not provide adequate
quality or quantity of data to develop a credible quantitative
analysis. We did find one tower in a residential area that
provided data that can isolate the impact of an adjacent tower.
The most relevant local data is from a subdivision located off
Carolina Beach Road called Cypress Village. This
subdivision is in the construction phase. The following
provides an aerial and a PLAT of this development. The
tower, which was constructed in 1999 is located on the
adjacent property.
Tower Type Location Year Built Address Height (Feet)
Monopole Commercial 1995 4502 Park Avenue 95
Registered Institutional 2016 3310 South College Road 150
Monopole Commercial 2002 5515 Carolina Beach Road 160
Lattice Commercial/Industrial 2004 434 Raleigh Street 180
Monopole Industrial 2003 5501 Greenville Loop Road 156
Registered Institutional 2015 5591 Marvin K Mosss Lane 195
Registered Institutional NA Halyburton Memorial Parkway 140
Monopole Industrial NA River Road 199
Monopole Commercial/Residential NA Off Willowick Park Drive 170
Monopole Commercial/Industrial NA Pickard Road & Shipyard Blvd. 115
Monopole Residential/Vacant Land NA Behind Deer Hill Drive 147
Monopole Electrical NA Pine Grove Dr. & Beasley Rd. 108
Monopole Residential/Vacant Land NA Antietam Dr. & Appomattox Dr. 199
Lattice Commercial/Industrial NA Raleigh St. & Carolina Beach Dr. 200
Monopole Residential 1999 Behind Cypress Village Place 195
Slick Stick Mini-Storage NA 202 North Dow Road 150
Monopole Residential/Vacant Land 2012 225 Mabee Way 89
Monopole Residential 2016 Off Murrayville Road 170
Monopole Industrial 2006 7654 Market Street 150
Monopole Industrial 1995 8524 Market Street 180
Monopole Institutional/Residential 2013 6115 Gordon Road 163
Monopole Industrial 2019 2020 Corporate Drive 192
Monopole Industrial 1997 6819 Gordon Road 177
New Hanover County Tower Summary
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 16
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 18 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The following chart provides a summary of the sales in the
subdivision. The two sales highlighted in yellow are the two
lots adjacent to the tower.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 17
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 19 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The sales have been arranged by date to reflect the higher
construction costs due to supply chain issues stemming from
the pandemic. The first three sales in the subdivision included
one of the lots adjacent to the tower. Despite its proximity to
the tower, the sale was the highest in price point and price per
square foot. Based on the analysis of the market date within
Address Sale Date Sales Price SF $/SF
773 Cypress Village Place 3/1/21 285,500$ 1,982 144.05$
777 Cypress Village Place 3/1/21 261,500$ 1,692 154.55$
781 Cypress Village Place 3/1/21 291,500$ 1,827 159.55$
712 Cypress Village Place 4/15/21 295,000$ 1,982 148.84$
715 Cypress Village Place 4/21/21 289,000$ 1,834 157.58$
708 Cypress Village Place 4/27/21 296,500$ 1,982 149.60$
732 Cypress Village Place 4/29/21 259,000$ 1,310 197.71$
736 Cypress Village Place 5/4/21 269,500$ 1,703 158.25$
707 Cypress Village Place 5/21/21 323,000$ 2,379 135.77$
733 Cypress Village Place 6/11/21 327,000$ 2,379 137.45$
728 Cypress Village Place 6/17/21 298,500$ 1,982 150.61$
780 Cypress Village Place 6/24/21 257,500$ 1,284 200.55$
760 Cypress Village Place 6/30/21 293,500$ 1,982 148.08$
725 Cypress Village Place 7/2/21 315,000$ 1,923 163.81$
711 Cypress Village Place 7/23/21 305,500$ 2,048 149.17$
765 Cypress Village Place 9/3/21 290,000$ 1,863 155.66$
748 Cypress Village Place 9/9/21 289,000$ 1,982 145.81$
749 Cypress Village Place 10/7/21 288,500$ 2,002 144.11$
753 Cypress Village Place 10/7/21 286,500$ 2,062 138.94$
724 Cypress Village Place 10/25/21 329,500$ 2,366 139.26$
752 Cypress Village Place 12/3/21 291,500$ 1,680 173.51$
764 Cypress Village Place 12/29/21 270,500$ 1,358 199.19$
772 Cypress Village Place 1/7/22 262,500$ 1,345 195.17$
768 Cypress Village Place 1/12/22 278,500$ 1,358 205.08$
720 Cypress Village Place 1/14/22 298,500$ 1,886 158.27$
769 Cypress Village Place 3/15/22 278,000$ 1,692 164.30$
756 Cypress Village Place 3/17/22 301,000$ 1,850 162.70$
744 Cypress Village Place 3/31/22 299,000$ 1,702 175.68$
757 Cypress Village Place 4/26/22 292,000$ 1,692 172.58$
716 Cypress Village Place 4/29/22 298,000$ 1,886 158.01$
745 Cypress Village Place 5/5/22 348,500$ 2,240 155.58$
761 Cypress Village Place 5/20/22 304,500$ 1,982 153.63$
776 Cypress Village Place 5/26/22 268,000$ 1,345 199.26$
Cypress Village Sales Summary
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 18
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 20 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
this subdivision, the tower does not substantially injure the
value of adjacent properties.
Given the limited data for the local towers, we provide
additional examples from studies performed in North
Carolina. These examples are provided in support of the
limited data from the local market. Given the residential
zoning of the surrounding properties, we provide examples of
residential developments with visual impact from a tower.
Other Market Data The first example is located on Woodpark Drive in High
Point, North Carolina. The monopole tower is similar to the
proposed tower. The surrounding developments are
townhomes that provide adequate quantity of data to develop
an opinion of whether this tower influences value. The
townhomes in the development have varying levels of visual
influence from the tower. The sales highlighted in yellow have
the highest level of visual influence from the tower as the
tower is located in view of their front door.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 19
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 21 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
We have included this example because higher density
residential developments are prevalent along major
transportation corridors. The sales directly across the street
from the tower, shown in yellow, do not show any influence
from the tower. In fact, one sale across the street is the highest
priced sale found within the past several years. This data
provides evidence that the visual influence from the tower has
no influence on prices paid.
The second example is from a subdivision in Cornelius, North
Carolina. Victoria Bay is a waterfront community on Lake
Norman and has similar improvements. This subdivision
includes some homes with frontage on the water. We have
excluded these sales to assist in isolating the influence of the
tower if any on residential properties. The following chart
provides a summary of the sales. The sales highlighted in
yellow have visual influence from the tower. The sales
highlighted in green are for a resale of the same property.
ID Address Size SF Bedrooms Bathrooms Sale Price Price/Sq. Ft. Sale Date Deed Book Page
196643 7836 WOODPARK DR 1,264 3 2 $100,000 $79.11 7/5/2018 8065-0590
196633 7820 WOODPARK DR 1,266 3 2 $137,000 $108.21 7/27/2016 7837-2933
196634 7822 WOODPARK DR 1,266 3 2 $122,000 $96.37 5/28/2015 7704-3038
196637 7828 WOODPARK DR 1,266 3 2 $114,000 $90.05 8/22/2014 7626-0825
196644 7846 WOODPARK DR 1,264 3 2 $135,000 $106.80 10/5/2017 7982-1602
196645 7844 WOODPARK DR 1,152 2 2 $98,000 $85.07 7/23/2014 7617-0256
196645 7844 WOODPARK DR 1,152 2 2 $104,500 $90.71 8/12/2016 7844-0746
196652 7871 WOODPARK DR 1,264 3 2 $115,000 $90.98 10/14/2014 7641-1701
196656 7859 WOODPARK DR 1,264 3 2 $125,000 $98.89 4/13/2017 7923-1098
196658 7855 WOODPARK DR 1,264 3 2 $106,000 $83.86 5/14/2015 7700-2575
Castle Pines at Hickswood Townhomes
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 20
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 22 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The sales shown have an average price per square foot of
$132.11. Three of the four sales with visual influence from the
tower are above the average. Six of the sales in the data set
were of the same model. Three of the sales have visual
influence from the tower. The prices paid per square foot are
comparable. The indication from the market is that the visual
Parcel # Street Address Sales Date Size (SF) $/SF Sales Price
003-381-44 19911 Marina Village Dr. April 13, 2018 1,620 138.27$ 224,000$
003-381-40 18505 Victoria Bay Dr. November 13, 2018 1,620 155.86$ 252,500$
003-381-30 18526 Victoria Bay Dr. July 1, 2020 2,219 145.11$ 322,000$
003-381-62 18611 Victoria Bay Dr. November 16, 2018 1,620 146.91$ 238,000$
003-381-65 18623 Victoria Bay Dr. February 28, 2018 1,620 139.51$ 226,000$
003-381-66 18627 Victoria Bay Dr. October 18, 2018 1,620 151.23$ 245,000$
003-381-25 18624 Victoria Bay Dr. November 20, 2018 2,052 119.40$ 245,000$
003-381-14 20030 Coral Cove Ct. January 11, 2018 1,620 134.57$ 218,000$
003-382-02 18122 Bluff Inlet Rd. June 19, 2020 2,071 153.31$ 317,500$
003-195-09 18111 Bluff Inlet Rd. May 18, 2018 2,052 121.83$ 250,000$
003-195-06 18021 Bluff Inlet Rd. July 16, 2018 2,012 136.68$ 275,000$
003-195-01 18001 Bluff Inlet Rd. April 17, 2020 1,645 151.98$ 250,000$
003-196-23 20815 Brinkley St. June 17, 2020 2,610 128.35$ 335,000$
003-196-12 18208 Harbor Mist Rd. February 23, 2018 2,709 108.90$ 295,000$
003-196-12 18208 Harbor Mist Rd. August 3, 2018 2,709 124.03$ 336,000$
003-196-36 20933 Brinkley St. September 7, 2018 2,528 128.56$ 325,000$
003-194-57 20102 Beard St. August 21, 2020 2,386 155.07$ 370,000$
003-195-59 20115 Beard St. September 4, 2018 2,263 124.61$ 282,000$
003-194-51 20914 Brinkley St. December 27, 2018 2,609 109.62$ 286,000$
003-194-25 18307 Victoria Bay Dr. February 21, 2018 2,332 125.21$ 292,000$
003-194-26 18311 Victoria Bay Dr. September 21, 2018 2,582 114.25$ 295,000$
003-194-25 18327 Victoria Bay Dr. January 24, 2018 2,609 105.40$ 275,000$
003-194-34 18409 Victoria Bay Dr. August 13, 2018 2,655 119.77$ 318,000$
Victoria Bay
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 21
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 23 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
impact from the tower does not adversely impact property
values in Victoria Bay.
The next tower with adequate data is a lattice tower located at
2517 Providence Road in Weddington, North Carolina.
Typically, we would not include this tower because of its
construction type and taller size. This tower as shown on the
photograph poses a significantly higher visual impact on the
subdivision to the north, Inverness at Providence Road. The
following chart provides a summary of market data for homes
in the subdivision. The sales highlighted in yellow have
significant visual impact from the tower. The sales
highlighted in green are resales of the same property to reflect
the appreciating market.
Parcel Number Book & Page Acreage Address Sale Amount Sale Date Year Built SF $/SF Parcel Number Book & Page Acreage Address Sale Amount Sale Date Year Built SF $/SF
6159379 7154 747 0.32 104 SOMERLED WAY 508,500$ 5/11/2018 2018 3,479 146.16$ 6159445 7736 0391 0.36 309 SOMERLED WAY 525,000$ 7/15/2020 2016 3,893 134.86$ 6159380 7145 188 0.37 108 SOMERLED WAY 471,000$ 4/27/2018 2017 3,859 122.05$ 6159446 6781 278 0.38 313 SOMERLED WAY 557,000$ 9/28/2016 2016 4,339 128.37$
6159381 7146 402 0.4 112 SOMERLED WAY 438,500$ 4/30/2018 2017 3,248 135.01$ 6159447 7120 362 0.32 317 SOMERLED WAY 534,500$ 3/19/2018 2017 4,291 124.56$
6159382 7172 333 0.4 113 SOMERLED WAY 559,000$ 6/8/2018 2015 3,921 142.57$ 6159448 7225 798 0.25 321 SOMERLED WAY 490,000$ 8/29/2018 2018 3,788 129.36$
6159383 7219 178 0.24 117 SOMERLED WAY 520,000$ 8/20/2018 2015 3,243 160.35$ 6159449 7244 446 0.25 325 SOMERLED WAY 472,500$ 10/1/2018 2018 4,225 111.83$ 6159384 7244 560 0.24 121 SOMERLED WAY 514,000$ 10/1/2018 2018 4,354 118.05$ 6159450 7536 0594 0.25 329 SOMERLED WAY 542,500$ 12/10/2019 2016 3,824 141.87$
6159385 7942 0230 0.24 125 SOMERLED WAY 550,000$ 1/4/2021 2018 3,248 169.33$ 6159451 6967 230 0.25 333 SOMERLED WAY 540,000$ 7/5/2017 2016 4,556 118.53$
6159386 6719 319 0.26 129 SOMERLED WAY 503,500$ 7/12/2016 2015 3,921 128.41$ 6159452 7219 017 0.27 337 SOMERLED WAY 455,000$ 8/17/2018 2018 3,248 140.09$
6159387 6546 130 0.27 201 SOMERLED WAY 486,000$ 10/12/2015 2015 3,942 123.29$ 6159453 7147 488 0.32 341 SOMERLED WAY 483,000$ 5/1/2018 2017 3,892 124.10$
6159388 6699 852 0.25 205 SOMERLED WAY 453,000$ 6/16/2016 2016 3,245 139.60$ 6159454 7144 410 0.33 345 SOMERLED WAY 491,500$ 4/26/2018 2017 3,248 151.32$ 6159389 6822 104 0.25 209 SOMERLED WAY 491,000$ 11/18/2016 2015 3,900 125.90$ 6159455 7684 0116 0.32 349 SOMERLED WAY 525,000$ 5/29/2020 2016 3,415 153.73$
6159390 6825 072 0.25 213 SOMERLED WAY 471,000$ 11/22/2016 2015 3,756 125.40$ 6159458 6885 265 0.353 105 BARCLAY DR 467,000$ 3/1/2017 2016 3,646 128.09$
6159391 6633 228 0.3 217 SOMERLED WAY 478,000$ 3/16/2016 2015 3,868 123.58$ 6159459 6880 725 0.342 109 BARCLAY DR 528,500$ 2/22/2017 2016 3,173 166.56$
6159392 6950 743 0.242 317 BARCLAY DR 668,500$ 6/12/2017 2016 6,507 102.74$ 6159460 6940 081 0.317 113 BARCLAY DR 518,000$ 5/26/2017 2017 4,291 120.72$
6159393 6851 790 0.27 321 BARCLAY DR 502,500$ 12/29/2016 2016 3,897 128.95$ 6159461 7047 708 0.358 117 BARCLAY DR 417,500$ 11/3/2017 2017 3,160 132.12$ 6159394 6645 149 0.35 325 BARCLAY DR 495,500$ 4/1/2016 2015 3,892 127.31$ 6159462 6920 777 0.305 121 BARCLAY DR 571,000$ 4/27/2017 2017 4,775 119.58$
6159396 6670 745 0.23 333 BARCLAY DR 491,500$ 5/9/2016 2016 3,892 126.28$ 6159463 7429 307 0.25 125 BARCLAY DR 588,000$ 7/31/2019 2018 3,892 151.08$
6159397 6712 081 0.23 337 BARCLAY DR 391,500$ 6/30/2016 2016 3,180 123.11$ 6159463 7224 607 0.25 125 BARCLAY DR 572,000$ 8/28/2018 2018 3,892 146.97$
6159398 6823 029 0.28 341 BARCLAY DR 458,500$ 11/18/2016 2016 3,186 143.91$ 6159464 7122 746 0.271 129 BARCLAY DR 526,500$ 3/22/2018 2017 5,874 89.63$
6159399 7086 853 0.29 2905 MERRYVALE WAY 545,000$ 1/12/2018 2016 4,222 129.09$ 6159466 7488 0001 0.274 137 BARCLAY DR 570,000$ 10/11/2019 2017 4,560 125.00$
6159400 6846 365 0.29 2909 MERRYVALE WAY 538,000$ 12/21/2016 2016 4,434 121.34$ 6159467 6921 598 0.274 141 BARCLAY DR 452,000$ 4/28/2017 2017 3,426 131.93$
6159401 6659 509 0.31 2913 MERRYVALE WAY 459,000$ 4/25/2016 2016 3,245 141.45$ 6159468 7397 0704 0.25 145 BARCLAY DR 521,000$ 6/21/2019 2017 3,763 138.45$ 6159402 6655 785 0.38 2917 MERRYVALE WAY 507,000$ 4/19/2016 2015 3,868 131.08$ 6159469 7032 212 0.25 149 BARCLAY DR 458,000$ 10/11/2017 2017 3,167 144.62$
6159403 6782 657 0.39 2920 MERRYVALE WAY 553,500$ 9/29/2016 2016 4,339 127.56$ 6159470 7223 321 0.25 153 BARCLAY DR 486,500$ 8/24/2018 2018 4,260 114.20$
6159404 6853 642 0.36 2916 MERRYVALE WAY 545,000$ 12/30/2016 2016 4,516 120.68$ 6159471 7244 507 0.25 157 BARCLAY DR 545,500$ 10/1/2018 2018 4,310 126.57$
6159405 6640 381 0.28 2912 MERRYVALE WAY 452,000$ 3/28/2016 2015 3,884 116.37$ 6159472 7243 553 0.25 161 BARCLAY DR 469,500$ 9/28/2018 2018 3,666 128.07$
6159406 6590 757 0.29 2908 MERRYVALE WAY 452,500$ 12/28/2015 2015 3,909 115.76$ 6159473 7237 611 0.25 165 BARCLAY DR 468,000$ 9/20/2018 2018 3,889 120.34$ 6159407 6591 307 0.29 2904 MERRYVALE WAY 448,000$ 12/28/2015 2015 3,892 115.11$ 6159474 7177 736 0.25 169 BARCLAY DR 511,500$ 6/18/2018 2018 3,822 133.83$
6159408 6591 474 0.33 2900 MERRYVALE WAY 451,000$ 12/29/2015 2015 3,868 116.60$ 6159475 7237 408 0.25 173 BARCLAY DR 480,000$ 9/20/2018 2018 3,892 123.33$
6159409 6690 738 0.29 2808 MERRYVALE WAY 419,000$ 6/3/2016 2016 3,245 129.12$ 6159476 7778 110 0.25 177 BARCLAY DR 530,000$ 8/19/2020 2018 3,559 148.92$ 6159410 6643 595 0.32 2804 MERRYVALE WAY 513,000$ 3/31/2016 2015 3,756 136.58$ 6159476 7235 595 0.25 177 BARCLAY DR 489,000$ 9/18/2018 2018 3,559 137.40$
6159411 7150 630 0.25 120 SOMERLED WAY 456,000$ 5/4/2018 2017 3,559 128.13$ 6159477 7775 473 0.298 181 BARCLAY DR 585,000$ 8/17/2020 2018 3,788 154.44$
6159412 6688 409 0.24 124 SOMERLED WAY 432,000$ 6/1/2016 2015 3,106 139.09$ 6159477 7227 402 0.298 181 BARCLAY DR 529,500$ 8/31/2018 2018 3,788 139.78$
6159413 7273 540 0.29 128 SOMERLED WAY 505,000$ 11/26/2018 2015 3,892 129.75$ 6159478 7243 069 0.287 185 BARCLAY DR 430,000$ 9/28/2018 2018 3,248 132.39$
6159414 6959 391 0.28 200 SOMERLED WAY 459,000$ 6/26/2017 2017 3,701 124.02$ 6159479 7202 403 0.287 189 BARCLAY DR 534,000$ 7/24/2018 2018 3,274 163.10$
6159415 6608 661 0.25 204 SOMERLED WAY 419,000$ 2/1/2016 2015 3,868 108.32$ 6159480 7437 393 0.287 193 BARCLAY DR 549,000$ 8/12/2019 2017 3,592 152.84$ 6159416 6731 757 0.25 208 SOMERLED WAY 467,500$ 7/28/2016 2016 3,890 120.18$ 6159480 7110 539 0.287 193 BARCLAY DR 520,000$ 2/28/2018 2017 3,592 144.77$
6159417 6757 188 0.25 212 SOMERLED WAY 456,500$ 8/30/2016 2016 3,881 117.62$ 6159481 7077 103 0.287 197 BARCLAY DR 621,500$ 12/22/2017 2017 6,158 100.93$
6159419 7045 313 0.3 220 SOMERLED WAY 460,000$ 10/31/2017 2016 3,173 144.97$ 6159482 7917 0532 0.295 201 BARCLAY DR 530,000$ 12/11/2020 2017 3,260 162.58$
6159420 6868 158 0.27 328 BARCLAY DR 529,500$ 1/31/2017 2016 4,340 122.00$ 6159483 7040 873 0.29 205 BARCLAY DR 462,000$ 10/25/2017 2017 3,900 118.46$ 6159421 6971 136 0.25 332 BARCLAY DR 466,000$ 7/12/2017 2017 3,833 121.58$ 6159484 7079 604 0.267 209 BARCLAY DR 521,000$ 12/29/2017 2017 3,806 136.89$
6159422 7204 509 0.25 336 BARCLAY DR 530,000$ 7/27/2018 2016 4,339 122.15$ 6159485 7042 866 0.283 213 BARCLAY DR 430,500$ 10/27/2017 2017 3,173 135.68$
6159423 6725 875 0.42 340 BARCLAY DR 533,000$ 7/21/2016 2016 3,892 136.95$ 6159486 7003 282 0.371 200 BARCLAY DR 558,500$ 8/28/2017 2017 4,531 123.26$
6159424 7242 439 0.33 301 SOMERLED WAY 500,000$ 9/27/2018 2016 4,310 116.01$ 6159487 6959 514 0.324 188 BARCLAY DR 488,500$ 6/26/2017 2017 3,911 124.90$
6159425 6842 058 0.32 305 SOMERLED WAY 433,500$ 12/16/2016 2016 3,173 136.62$ 6159488 6985 188 0.333 180 BARCLAY DR 552,000$ 7/31/2017 2017 4,541 121.56$ 6159433 7224 094 0.3 301 BARCLAY DR 455,500$ 8/27/2018 2018 3,479 130.93$ 6159489 7091 878 0.254 172 BARCLAY DR 495,500$ 1/24/2018 2017 3,274 151.34$
6159434 6825 757 0.27 305 BARCLAY DR 644,500$ 11/22/2016 2016 5,830 110.55$ 6159490 7205 416 0.25 168 BARCLAY DR 503,500$ 7/30/2018 2018 4,310 116.82$
6159435 6825 096 0.28 309 BARCLAY DR 632,000$ 11/22/2016 2016 5,954 106.15$ 6159491 7066 746 0.25 164 BARCLAY DR 482,000$ 12/7/2017 2017 4,211 114.46$
6159436 6744 188 0.33 313 BARCLAY DR 534,500$ 8/15/2016 2016 3,868 138.19$ 6159492 7073 062 0.25 160 BARCLAY DR 477,500$ 12/18/2017 2017 3,912 122.06$
6159437 7147 247 0.28 308 SOMERLED WAY 464,500$ 4/30/2018 2016 3,879 119.75$ 6159493 7546 349 0.25 156 BARCLAY DR 521,000$ 12/20/2019 2017 3,248 160.41$ 6159438 6660 854 0.25 316 SOMERLED WAY 465,500$ 4/26/2016 2016 3,890 119.67$ 6159493 7140 614 0.25 156 BARCLAY DR 514,500$ 4/20/2018 2017 3,248 158.41$
6159439 6693 863 0.24 320 SOMERLED WAY 448,000$ 6/8/2016 2016 3,868 115.82$ 6159494 6982 514 0.25 152 BARCLAY DR 506,000$ 7/27/2017 2017 4,566 110.82$
6159440 7232 454 0.24 324 SOMERLED WAY 533,000$ 9/10/2018 2016 3,756 141.91$ 6159495 7139 083 0.25 148 BARCLAY DR 470,000$ 4/18/2018 2017 3,883 121.04$
6159441 6693 353 0.24 328 SOMERLED WAY 495,000$ 6/8/2016 2016 3,408 145.25$ 6159496 7067 001 0.25 144 BARCLAY DR 500,000$ 12/7/2017 2017 4,311 115.98$ 6159442 6653 116 0.24 332 SOMERLED WAY 452,500$ 4/14/2016 2015 3,890 116.32$ 6159497 6885 172 0.307 140 BARCLAY DR 473,000$ 2/28/2017 2016 3,918 120.72$ 6159443 6712 158 0.29 340 SOMERLED WAY 456,500$ 7/1/2016 2016 3,245 140.68$ 6159498 7078 310 0.304 132 BARCLAY DR 429,500$ 12/27/2017 2017 3,164 135.75$
6159444 7833 0099 0.27 348 SOMERLED WAY 595,000$ 10/2/2020 2016 3,196 186.17$ 6159499 6867 900 0.25 124 BARCLAY DR 439,500$ 1/30/2017 2016 3,866 113.68$
6159500 6931 427 0.458 116 BARCLAY DR 581,000$ 5/12/2017 2017 4,331 134.15$
Inverness Subdivision Sales
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 22
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 24 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The most significant factor in the analysis of the data is the
date of sale. The housing shortage has shown a spike in prices
paid. The price point for these homes averages approximately
$500,000. The sales prices for the houses with visual
influence from the tower range from $448,000 to $553,500
which is consistent with the sales of homes without a visual
influence despite their older sale date. The price per square
foot for the impacted houses ranges from $115.11 to $141.45
per square foot. Again, the rates bookend the median and
averages for the neighborhood. The indication from the
analysis is that the presence of a cell tower posing a higher
level of visual impact with a light did not significantly impact
the value of properties.
The Vickery subdivision located in Waxhaw, North Carolina
has a cell tower just north of the lots at the terminus of Vickery
Drive. This tower has a comparable distance to adjacent
improvements. The vegetative buffer is comparable to the
proposed tower. The analysis for those properties closest to
the tower are compared to those within the remainder of the
subdivision. The following chart provides sales within the
Size Sale Price $/SF
Minimum 3,106 391,500$ 89.63$
Maximum 6,507 668,500$ 186.17$
Average 3,894 501,287$ 130.65$
Median 3,879 495,500$ 128.09$
Inverness Summary
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 23
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 25 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
subdivision with the properties closest to the tower
highlighted in yellow.
Parcel Number
Book &
Page Acreage Address Sale Amount Size SFD (SF) Price/SF Sale Date
Assessed
Value
% of
Assessed
Value Year Built
7075300 6775 248 0.474 1209 VICKERY DR 474,000$ 4,032 117.56$ 9/21/2016 387,500$ 122% 2016
7075301 6775 389 0.584 1215 VICKERY DR 467,000$ 4,224 110.56$ 9/21/2016 398,200$ 117% 2016
7075299 6778 636 0.481 1205 VICKERY DR 447,000$ 3,453 129.45$ 9/26/2016 358,100$ 125% 2016
7075302 6781 324 0.472 1305 VICKERY DR 429,900$ 3,011 142.78$ 9/28/2016 366,300$ 117% 2016
7075308 6782 602 0.486 1416 VICKERY DR 404,000$ 3,427 117.89$ 9/29/2016 344,300$ 117% 2016
7075305 6785 056 0.46 1415 VICKERY DR 438,000$ 3,789 115.60$ 9/30/2016 380,200$ 115% 2016
7075304 6786 509 0.501 1407 VICKERY DR 390,000$ 2,922 133.47$ 10/4/2016 316,900$ 123% 2016
7075315 6800 627 0.608 1300 VICKERY DR 436,500$ 3,073 142.04$ 10/21/2016 340,200$ 128% 2016
7075310 6802 034 0.565 1408 VICKERY DR 495,500$ 4,032 122.89$ 10/24/2016 387,300$ 128% 2016
7075309 6807 378 0.53 1412 VICKERY DR 508,815$ 3,865 131.65$ 10/28/2016 406,700$ 125% 2016
7075303 6807 603 0.466 1401 VICKERY DR 435,000$ 3,571 121.81$ 10/31/2016 362,400$ 120% 2016
7075298 6835 577 0.514 1201 VICKERY DR 480,705$ 3,956 121.51$ 12/7/2016 388,200$ 124% 2016
7075314 6843 242 0.498 1304 VICKERY DR 464,900$ 3,850 120.75$ 12/16/2016 375,900$ 124% 2016
7075307 6843 367 0.466 1423 VICKERY DR 470,000$ 3,672 128.00$ 12/19/2016 362,500$ 130% 2016
7075326 6844 281 0.463 2023 DONOVAN DR 450,500$ 2,922 154.18$ 12/19/2016 324,100$ 139% 2016
7075330 6847 478 0.529 2028 DONOVAN DR 438,500$ 3,642 120.40$ 12/22/2016 355,500$ 123% 2016
7075335 6848 787 0.504 2011 CHALET LN 475,207$ 3,672 129.41$ 12/27/2016 363,700$ 131% 2016
7075331 6848 807 0.473 2024 DONOVAN DR 492,000$ 4,832 101.82$ 12/27/2016 420,500$ 117% 2016
7075332 6851 725 0.461 2018 DONOVAN DR 454,348$ 3,594 126.42$ 12/29/2016 358,800$ 127% 2016
7075312 6851 804 0.542 1402 VICKERY DR 417,000$ 3,037 137.31$ 12/29/2016 338,500$ 123% 2016
7075325 6859 111 0.463 2019 DONOVAN DR 462,500$ 3,037 152.29$ 1/13/2017 338,900$ 136% 2016
7075317 6862 313 0.496 1110 VICKERY DR 448,836$ 3,644 123.17$ 1/19/2017 376,500$ 119% 2016
7075313 6880 472 0.497 1308 VICKERY DR 476,853$ 4,102 116.25$ 2/22/2017 395,100$ 121% 2016
7075350 6882 808 0.483 1004 KARA CT 459,050$ 3,430 133.83$ 2/24/2017 344,000$ 133% 2016
7075311 6883 380 0.513 1406 VICKERY DR 499,900$ 4,240 117.90$ 2/27/2017 406,500$ 123% 2016
7075338 6886 457 0.537 3021 CHALET LN 506,000$ 3,803 133.05$ 3/2/2017 369,800$ 137% 2016
7075337 6891 603 0.531 3015 CHALET LN 442,890$ 3,036 145.88$ 3/10/2017 323,500$ 137% 2016
7075333 6892 523 0.473 2012 DONOVAN DR 494,990$ 3,777 131.05$ 3/13/2017 382,500$ 129% 2016
7075345 6894 492 0.534 3000 CHALET LN 432,000$ 3,109 138.95$ 3/16/2017 336,300$ 128% 2016
7075306 6896 071 0.462 1419 VICKERY DR 455,800$ 3,488 130.68$ 3/20/2017 366,600$ 124% 2016
7075334 6903 497 0.567 2002 DONOVAN DR 469,900$ 3,430 137.00$ 3/30/2017 359,100$ 131% 2016
7075336 6928 229 0.521 3003 CHALET LN 558,582$ 4,258 131.18$ 5/9/2017 403,700$ 138% 2017
7075343 6934 030 0.544 3012 CHALET LN 502,000$ 3,646 137.69$ 5/18/2017 366,500$ 137% 2017
7075348 6943 103 0.473 1016 KARA CT 498,677$ 3,609 138.18$ 5/31/2017 366,200$ 136% 2017
7075344 6948 415 0.56 3008 CHALET LN 512,900$ 4,059 126.36$ 6/8/2017 408,800$ 125% 2016
7075322 6954 471 0.516 2005 DONOVAN DR 512,000$ 3,910 130.95$ 6/16/2017 388,900$ 132% 2017
7075341 6955 571 0.53 3024 CHALET LN 499,900$ 4,085 122.37$ 6/19/2017 395,600$ 126% 2017
7075340 6957 267 0.482 3030 CHALET LN 465,335$ 3,462 134.41$ 6/21/2017 353,700$ 132% 2017
7075349 6961 836 0.492 1010 KARA CT 493,500$ 4,102 120.31$ 6/28/2017 395,100$ 125% 2017
7075297 6961 627 0.509 1109 VICKERY DR 470,049$ 3,413 137.72$ 6/28/2017 358,800$ 131% 2017
7075347 6962 872 0.579 1020 KARA CT 507,500$ 3,885 130.63$ 6/29/2017 371,900$ 136% 2017
7075351 6964 408 0.476 1002 KARA CT 440,000$ 3,528 124.72$ 6/30/2017 353,200$ 125% 2016
7075316 6965 130 0.568 1210 VICKERY DR 449,900$ 3,528 127.52$ 6/30/2017 353,400$ 127% 2016
7075346 6978 225 0.567 1005 KARA CT 528,250$ 3,913 135.00$ 7/21/2017 390,200$ 135% 2017
7075329 7020 463 0.541 2032 DONOVAN DR 457,400$ 3,000 152.47$ 9/22/2017 341,200$ 134% 2017
7075323 7029 563 0.505 2009 DONOVAN DR 469,500$ 3,074 152.73$ 10/6/2017 342,000$ 137% 2017
7075328 7043 656 0.613 2027 DONOVAN DR 513,500$ 3,963 129.57$ 10/30/2017 391,400$ 131% 2017
7075339 7043 673 0.548 3031 CHALET LN 443,000$ 3,074 144.11$ 10/30/2017 333,800$ 133% 2017
7075324 7064 691 0.512 2015 DONOVAN DR 471,085$ 3,609 130.53$ 12/4/2017 353,900$ 133% 2017
7075342 7072 416 0.525 3018 CHALET LN 495,000$ 3,777 131.06$ 12/15/2017 382,300$ 129% 2017
7075327 7133 380 0.467 2025 DONOVAN DR 509,000$ 3,735 136.28$ 4/9/2018 362,500$ 140% 2016
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 24
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 26 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
For the analysis, we used several units of comparison. The
price point for the properties closest to the tower are within
the range of the rest of the subdivision. While one sale is on
the lower end of the range another is on the upper end of the
range indicating that the proximity to the cell tower does not
influence the price point. We also looked at the price per
square foot. Again, the sales in proximity to the tower were
consistent with nominal variances with other properties in the
subdivision. We also compared the sales prices to the assessed
values of the properties. Again, this comparison yielded the
same results that the market and prices paid for properties in
proximity to the tower were not impacted by the tower.
The next tower found is located southeast of the Prestwick
subdivision in Charlotte, North Carolina. The following aerial
shows the tower to the southeast of the subdivision.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 25
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 27 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The tower is a monopole tower with some trees between the
tower and the residential properties within Prestwick. The
following chart provides a summary of sales within the
subdivision with the properties highlighted in yellow having
some level of visual influence from the tower.
Despite consideration of adjustments to the data set for a
variety of physical and market variances, the single-family
dwelling with the highest level of visual impact from the
tower lies within the range of the data set presented. This
analysis indicates that the visual impact of this tower does not
substantially impact property values of residential properties.
Other potential impacts to the surrounding area include noise,
traffic, and lighting. The operation of a cell tower is
essentially silent and would not influence the surrounding
Parcel Number Book & Page Acreage Address Sale Amount Size SFD (SF) Price/SF Sale Date Assessed Value
% of
Assessed
Value Year Built
7135197 6730 543 0.16 5810 PARKSTONE DR $247,000 3,288 $75.12 7/26/2016 $246,000 100% 2006
7135211 7011 590 0.15 5807 PARKSTONE DR $260,000 2,844 $91.42 9/8/2017 $224,100 116% 2006
7135214 6918 096 0.14 5801 PARKSTONE DR $245,000 2,744 $89.29 4/24/2017 $217,400 113% 2006
7135218 6991 886 0.16 5717 PARKSTONE DR $271,000 2,732 $99.19 8/10/2017 $218,500 124% 2006
7135221 6636 021 0.17 5707 PARKSTONE DR $250,000 2,744 $91.11 3/21/2016 $220,300 113% 2006
7135228 6728 324 0.17 5706 PARKSTONE DR $242,000 2,652 $91.25 7/25/2016 $212,300 114% 2006
7135238 6756 020 0.18 3107 ROYAL TROON LN $260,000 2,744 $94.75 8/29/2016 $217,500 120% 2006
7135243 7228 074 0.14 3005 ROYAL TROON LN $235,000 1,956 $120.14 8/31/2018 $179,400 131% 2006
7135190 7192 422 0.14 5704 FALKIRK LN $274,000 2,856 $95.94 7/10/2018 $223,600 123% 2006
7135193 7228 475 0.15 5800 PARKSTONE DR $287,500 3,026 $95.01 8/31/2018 $233,600 123% 2006
7135196 7154 843 0.16 5808 PARKSTONE DR $256,000 2,744 $93.29 5/11/2018 $219,900 116% 2006
7135198 6903 572 0.16 5812 PARKSTONE DR $262,000 2,744 $95.48 3/30/2017 $217,500 120% 2006
7135213 7199 856 0.14 5803 PARKSTONE DR $277,000 2,732 $101.39 7/20/2018 $218,700 127% 2006
7135215 6985 085 0.14 5723 PARKSTONE DR $245,000 3,268 $74.97 7/31/2017 $244,300 100% 2006
7135232 6890 100 0.17 5714 PARKSTONE DR $238,000 1,794 $132.66 3/8/2017 $176,700 135% 2006
7135239 6820 854 0.18 3105 ROYAL TROON DR $260,000 2,732 $95.17 11/16/2016 $225,700 115% 2006
7135279 7257 886 0.14 5911 PARKSTONE DR $211,000 2,654 $79.50 10/25/2018 $213,200 99% 2007
7135284 7231 065 0.16 5901 PARKSTONE DR $278,000 2,983 $93.19 9/6/2018 $231,100 120% 2007
7135201 7002 308 0.18 5818 PARKSTONE DR $260,000 2,837 $91.65 8/25/2017 $224,700 116% 2007
7135256 6773 258 0.14 5708 FALKIRK LN $232,500 2,104 $110.50 9/19/2016 $192,700 121% 2007
7135273 7232 509 0.15 5910 PARKSTONE DR $273,000 3,075 $88.78 9/10/2018 $235,100 116% 2007
7135283 6943 153 0.16 5903 PARKSTONE DR $255,000 2,654 $96.08 5/31/2017 $212,500 120% 2007
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 26
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 28 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
developments. The additional traffic caused by the proposed
development includes two to three trips a month for routine
maintenance. Any increases in traffic are considered nominal
and does not impact the abutting properties. One of the
examples includes a lit tower with lattice construction posing
a significantly higher visual impact than the proposed tower.
Conclusions The market activity around cell towers indicates that the
visual impact of the proposed tower is not reflected in the
prices paid. In other words, if I were to appraise any of the
abutting properties of the proposed development, the market
data does not support any adjustments for the visual impact of
the tower. Therefore, I conclude that the proposed
development of a wireless telecommunications facility will
not substantially injure the value of abutting properties.
Qualitative Analysis In addition to the market activity for existing towers, we also
consider the surrounding developments for the subject. The
question posed for this study is “would the development of the
wireless facility warrant a downward adjustment to
neighborhood properties?” The information from the previous
analysis indicates that there is no empirical evidence to
support a quantitative adjustment. The following analysis is
intended to determine whether a qualitative adjustment is
warranted.
Subject Neighborhood When considering qualitative adjustments in an appraisal, the
appraiser must consider all factors that could contribute to an
adjustment. The aesthetics and location of the proposed
development as well as the existing developments are a factor
in developing our opinion. The factors considered in
developing our opinion include but are not necessarily limited
to:
The market has not shown a detrimental impact on
development patterns in areas with visual influence
from a wireless facility.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 27
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 29 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
The tower will be adjacent to the new bypass currently
under construction. The bypass represents a higher
level of impact than the proposed tower.
Many of the properties in the area are classified as
wetlands that limits the development possibilities.
All these factors would contribute to the aesthetic appeal and
a hypothetical valuation of properties in the neighborhood.
The multitude of factors indicates that multicollinearity for
aesthetics exists. Multicollinearity arises when multiple items
correlate with each other. The multiple factors can cause a
distortion of the impact of any of the factors individually
without consideration for all the factors that contribute to the
common issue. The external influence of the bypass is an
external influence that supersedes the impact of the tower.
The following provides a summary of our conclusions
regarding the items for a special use permit. We reiterate these
items for reference purposes.
Item 3 Cell towers are essentially silent and would not interfere with
the use and enjoyment of properties in the area. The existing
traffic for Plantation Road would increase nominally because
of the proposed tower. The influence of the bypass is
significantly larger than the proposed tower. Based on the
market data presented and the siting of the proposed tower
adjacent to the bypass, we conclude that the proposed tower
will not substantially injure the value of adjacent or abutting
properties.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 28
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 30 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Item 4 We conclude that the proposed development will be in
harmony with the area. Throughout New Hanover County and
North Carolina, the presence of cell towers along major
transportation routes is common. The transformation of the
corridor will occur with increased transportation linkage.
While the area is mostly vacant and includes wetlands, the
development patterns of the area are likely to include
residential development. As shown throughout this study, the
development of a cell tower is common and harmonious with
this likely future development pattern.
Therefore, it is our opinion that the proposed development in
accordance with the proposed conditions will not substantially
injure the value of adjacent or abutting properties. The
external influence of the bypass is significantly higher than
the proposed tower. It is my opinion that the proposed
development will not substantially detract from the aesthetics
or character of the neighborhood because of its location
adjacent to the highway.
Michael P. Berkowitz
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 29
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 31 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
ADDENDA
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 30
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 32 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Certification
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 31
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 33 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
CERTIFICATION OF THE ANALYST
I, Michael P. Berkowitz, certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions
and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses,
opinions, and conclusions.
3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no
personal interest with respect to the parties involved.
4. I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property
that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance
of this assignment.
5. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties
involved with this assignment.
6. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting
predetermined results.
7. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or
reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the
amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a
subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this study.
8. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been
prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.
9. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review
by its duly authorized representatives.
10. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
11. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this
certification other than those individuals having signed the attached report.
Michael P. Berkowitz
(NC State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #A6169)
(SC State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #CG6277)
October 18, 2022
Date
(Rev: 06/18/12)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 32
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 34 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 33
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 35 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Limit of Liability
The liability of MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC and employees is limited to the client only and to the
fee actually received by our firm. Further, there is no accountability, obligation, or liability to any
third party. If this report is placed in the hands of anyone other than client, the client shall make
such party aware of all limiting conditions and assumptions of the assignment and related
discussions. Further, client will forever indemnify and hold MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC, its
officers, and employees harmless from any claims by third parties related in any way to the
appraisal or study which is the subject of the report. Third parties shall include limited partners of
client if client is a partnership and stockholders of client if client is a corporation, and all lenders,
tenants, past owners, successors, assigns, transferees, and spouses of client. MPB REAL ESTATE,
LLC will not be responsible for any costs incurred to discover or correct any deficiencies of any
type present in the property, physically, financially, and/or legally.
Copies, Distribution, Use of Report
Possession of this report or any copy of this report does not carry with it the right of publication,
nor may it be used for other than its intended use; the physical report remains the property of MPB
REAL ESTATE, LLC for the use of the client, the fee being for the analytical services only.
The bylaws and regulations of the Appraisal Institute require each member and candidate to control
the use and distribution of each report signed by such member or candidate; except, however, the
client may distribute copies of this report in its entirety to such third parties as he may select;
however, selected portions of this report shall not be given to third parties without the prior written
consent of the signatories of this report. Neither all nor any part of this report shall be disseminated
to the general public by the use of advertising media, public relations, news, sales or other media
for public communication without the prior written consent of MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC.
Confidentiality
This report is to be used only in its entirety and no part is to be used without the whole report. All
conclusions and opinions concerning the analysis as set forth in the report were prepared by MPB
REAL ESTATE, LLC whose signatures appear on the report. No change of any item in the report
shall be made by anyone other than MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC. MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC shall
have no responsibility if any such unauthorized change is made.
MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC may not divulge the material contents of the report, analytical findings
or conclusions, or give a copy of the report to anyone other than the client or his designee as
specified in writing except as may be required by the Appraisal Institute as they may request in
confidence for ethics enforcement, or by a court of law or body with the power of subpoena.
Trade Secrets
This report was obtained from MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC and consists of “trade secrets and
commercial or financial information” which is privileged and confidential and exempted from
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 (b) (4) of the Uniform Commercial Code. MPB REAL ESTATE,
LLC shall be notified of any request to reproduce this report in whole or in part.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 34
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 36 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Information Used
No responsibility is assumed for accuracy of information furnished by or work of others, the client,
his designee, or public records. We are not liable for such information or the work of
subcontractors. The comparable data relied upon in this report has been confirmed with one or
more parties familiar with the transaction or from affidavit or other sources thought reasonable; all
are considered appropriate for inclusion to the best of our factual judgment and knowledge. An
impractical and uneconomic expenditure of time would be required in attempting to furnish
unimpeachable verification in all instances, particularly as to engineering and market-related
information. It is suggested that the client consider independent verification as a prerequisite to
any transaction involving sale, lease, or other significant commitment of funds for the subject
property.
Financial Information
Our value opinion(s) have been based on unaudited financials, and other data provided to us by
management and/or owners. If these reports are found to be inaccurate, we reserve the right to
revise our value opinion(s). It is noted we are depending on these accounting statements as being
accurate and our interpretation of these statements as being accurate as well. If these assumptions
later prove to be false, we reserve the right to amend our opinions of value.
Testimony, Consultation, Completion of Contract for Report Services
The contract for report, consultation, or analytical service is fulfilled and the total fee payable upon
completion of the report, unless otherwise specified. MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC or those assisting
in preparation of the report will not be asked or required to give testimony in court or hearing
because of having made the report, in full or in part, nor engage in post report consultation with
client or third parties except under separate and special arrangement and at an additional fee. If
testimony or deposition is required because of any subpoena, the client shall be responsible for
any additional time, fees, and charges, regardless of issuing party.
Exhibits
The illustrations and maps in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property
and are not necessarily to scale. Various photographs, if any, are included for the same purpose as
of the date of the photographs. Site plans are not surveys unless so designated.
Legal, Engineering, Financial, Structural or Mechanical Nature, Hidden Components, Soil
No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character or nature, nor matters of survey, nor of
any architectural, structural, mechanical, or engineering nature. No opinion is rendered as to the
title, which is presumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as if free and clear,
unless otherwise stated in particular parts of the report. The legal description is assumed to be
correct as used in this report as furnished by the client, his designee, or as derived by MPB REAL
ESTATE, LLC.
MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC has inspected as far as possible, by observation, the land and the
improvements; however, it was not possible to personally observe conditions beneath the soil, or
hidden structural, mechanical or other components, and MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC shall not be
responsible for defects in the property which may be related.
The report is based on there being no hidden, unapparent, or apparent conditions of the property
site, subsoil or structures or toxic materials which would render it more or less valuable. No
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 35
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 37 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
responsibility is assumed for any such conditions or for any expertise or engineering to discover
them. All mechanical components are assumed to be in operable condition and status standard for
properties of the subject type. Conditions of heating, cooling, ventilation, electrical, and plumbing
equipment are considered to be commensurate with the condition of the balance of the
improvements unless otherwise stated. We are not experts in this area, and it is recommended, if
appropriate, the client obtain an inspection of this equipment by a qualified professional.
If MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC has not been supplied with a termite inspection, survey or
occupancy permit, no responsibility or representation is assumed or made for any costs associated
with obtaining same or for any deficiencies discovered before or after they are obtained. No
representation or warranties are made concerning obtaining the above mentioned items.
MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC assumes no responsibility for any costs or consequences arising due
to the need, or the lack of need, for flood hazard insurance. An agent for The Federal Flood
Insurance Program should be contacted to determine the actual need for Flood Hazard Insurance.
Legality of Use
The report is based on the premise that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state
and local environmental regulations and laws unless otherwise stated in the report; further, that all
applicable zoning, building and use regulations, and restrictions of all types have been complied
with unless otherwise stated in the report. Further, it is assumed that all required licenses, consents,
permits, or other legislative or administrative authority, local, state, federal and/or private entity
or organization have been or may be obtained or renewed for any use considered in the value
estimate.
Component Values
The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only
under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must not
be used in conjunction with any other report and are invalid if so used.
Auxiliary and Related Studies
No environmental or impact studies, special market study or analysis, highest and best use analysis,
study or feasibility study has been required or made unless otherwise specified in an agreement
for services or in the report.
Dollar Values, Purchasing Power
The market value estimated and the costs used are as of the date of the estimate of value, unless
otherwise indicated. All dollar amounts are based on the purchasing power and price of the dollar
as of the date of the value estimate.
Inclusions
Furnishings and equipment or personal property or business operations, except as specifically
indicated and typically considered as a part of real estate, have been disregarded with only the real
estate being considered in the value estimate, unless otherwise stated. In some property types,
business and real estate interests and values are combined.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 36
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 38 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Proposed Improvements, Special Value
Improvements proposed, if any, onsite or offsite, as well as any repairs required, are considered
for purposes of this report to be completed in a timely, good and workmanlike manner, according
to information submitted and/or considered by MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC. In cases of proposed
construction, the report is subject to change upon inspection of property after construction is
completed.
Value Change, Dynamic Market, Influences, Alteration of Estimate
The estimated value, which is defined in the report, is subject to change with market changes over
time. Value is highly related to exposure, time, promotional effort, terms, motivation, and
conditions surrounding the offering. The value estimate considers the productivity and relative
attractiveness of the property physically and economically in the marketplace.
In cases of reports involving the capitalization of income benefits, the estimate of market value or
investment value or value in use is a reflection of such benefits and MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC'
interpretation of income and yields and other factors derived from general and specific client and
market information. Such estimates are as of the date of the estimate of value; thus, they are subject
to change as the market and value is naturally dynamic.
The “estimate of market value” in the report is not based in whole or in part upon the race, color,
or national origin of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the property
appraised.
Report and Value Estimate
Report and value estimate are subject to change if physical or legal entity or financing differ from
that envisioned in this report.
Management of the Property
It is assumed that the property which is the subject of this report will be under prudent and
competent ownership and management.
Hazardous Materials
Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without
limitation, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals,
which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental conditions, were not
called to the attention of nor did MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC become aware of such during their
inspection. MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC had no knowledge of the existence of such materials on
or in the property unless otherwise stated. MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC, however, is not qualified
to test such substances or conditions. If the presence of such substances such as asbestos, urea
formaldehyde foam insulation, or other hazardous substances or environmental conditions, may
affect the value of the property, the value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no
such condition on or in the property or in the proximity that it would cause a loss in value. No
responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge
required to discover them.
Soil and Subsoil Conditions
Unless otherwise stated in this report, MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC does not warrant the soil or
subsoil conditions for toxic or hazardous waste materials. Where any suspected materials might
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 37
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 39 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
be present, we have indicated in the report; however, MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC are not experts
in this field and recommend appropriate engineering studies to monitor the presence or absence of
these materials.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
“MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC has not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this
property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective January 26, 1992. It is
possible that a compliance survey of the property together with a detailed analysis of the
requirements of the ADA could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of
the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the
property. Since MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC has no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did
not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the
property.”
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 38
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 40 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
Qualifications of the Analyst
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 39
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 41 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ANALYST
Michael P. Berkowitz
MPB Real Estate, LLC, Inc.
1100 Sundance Drive
Concord, North Carolina 28027
(704) 605-0595
EDUCATION AND CREDENTIALS
Duke University
Major: Economics 1985-1989
Central Piedmont Community College
R-1 - Introduction to Real Estate Appraisal, 2002
R-2 - Valuation Principles and Procedures, 2002
R-3 - Applied Residential Property Valuation, 2002
G-1 - Introduction to Income Property Appraisal, 2003
Bob Ipock and Associates
G-2 - Advanced Income Capitalization Procedures, 2003
G-3 - Applied Property Income Valuation 2004
Appraisal Institute
520 Highest and Best Use and Market Analysis, 2004
Seminar Rates, Multipliers and Ratios 2005
530 Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches 2006
Seminar Apartment Appraisal, Concepts & Applications 2009
Seminar Appraising Distresses Commercial Real Estate 2009
Seminar Appraising Convenience Stores 2011
Seminar Analyzing Operating Expenses 2011
AFFILIATIONS AND ACTIVITIES
Association Memberships
North Carolina State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, October 2006, Certificate No.
A6169
RELATED EXPERIENCE
Provided real estate consulting services for a variety of clients including real estate brokers,
property owners and financial planners
Performed financial feasibility studies for multiple property types including golf communities,
and renovation projects.
Developed plan for self-contained communities.
Race Track expertise
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 40
IMPACT STUDY PLANTATION ROAD, MURRAYVILLE, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC Page 42 of 41
(NH-003) MPB REAL ESTATE, LLC
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
A partial list of types of properties appraised include:
Retail Properties, Single and Multi-Tenant, Proposed and Existing
Office Single and Multi-Tenant Proposed and Existing
Mixed-Use Properties, Proposed and Existing
Industrial Properties, Warehouse, Flex and Manufacturing
Vacant Land
Condemnation
C-Stores
Race Tracks
CLIENTELE
Bank of America
Transylvania County
Cabarrus County
Mecklenburg County
City of Statesville
NC Department of Transportation
Henry County, GA
Town of Loudon, NH
First Citizens Bank
City of Charlotte
City of Concord
Union County
BB & T
Aegon USA Realty Advisors
Sun Trust Bank
First Charter Bank
Regions Bank
Charlotte Housing Authority
Alliance Bank and Trust
Broadway Bank
Duke Energy Corporation
Jim R. Funderburk, PLLC
Hamilton, Fay, Moon, Stephens, Steele & Martin
Senator Marshall A. Rauch
Perry, Bundy, Plyler & Long, LLP
Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson
CSX Real Property
Baucom, Clayton, Burton, Morgan & Wood, PA
City of Mount Holly
Our Towns Habitat for Humanity
Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP
Central Carolina Bank
Southern Community Bank and Trust
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 8 - 41
EXHIBIT F: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PLANTATION ROAD (Parcel ID: R02800-004-012-001)
SKYWAY TOWERS (Applicant)
Exhibit F consists of this page and the following twenty-three (23) plan sheets comprising the
conceptual site plan for the subject property depicting the proposed telecommunications facility
that is the subject of this special use permit application:
Plan Title: Skyway Site ID: NC-08899
Skyway Site Name: Murrayville
Plantation Road
Wilmington, NC 28409
New Hanover County
Plan Date: 9/30/22; Sheets EE-1 and EE-2 dated 3/03/22.
Prepared by: Network Building + Consulting
Plan Sheets:
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 1
T-1
TITLE SHEET
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
SITE
VICINITY MAP
DIRECTIONS
APPLICANT:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FIRM:
ENGINEERING FIRM:
SKYWAY TOWERS
3637 MADACA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
SKYWAY TOWERS
3637 MADACA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
TKK ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
6095 MARSHALEE DR, SUITE 300
ELKRIDGE, MD 21075
(410) 712-7092
PROJECT TEAM
SITE INFORMATION
SITE ADDRESS:
TOWER CENTER
LATITUDE (NAD 83):
LONGITUDE (NAD 83):
GROUND ELEVATION:
JURISDICTION:
ZONING:
PARCEL ID:
PARCEL AREA:
CURRENT USE:
PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA:
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:
PARCEL OWNER:
TOWER OWNER:
STRUCTURE TYPE:
STRUCTURE HEIGHT:
CLASSIFICATION GROUP:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
POWER SUPPLIER:
(911 ADDRESS TBD)
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
34° 18' 11.6634" N
77° 49' 27.0943" W
42.0' AMSL
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
R-15 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
R02800-004-012-001
4.28 ACRES
VACANT
14,700 SQ.FT.
7,600 SQ.FT.
PARKER KENNETH R SR ELOISE T
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
SKYWAY TOWERS
3637 MADACA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
MONOPOLE
195'-0" (AGL) (TOP OF TOWER)
199'-0" (AGL) (HIGHEST POINT)
U
2B
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
CONTACT: TBD
PHONE: TBD
WORK ORDER # TBD
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24"X36". CONTRACTOR SHALL
VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND
SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGNER / ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR MATERIAL ORDERS OR BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION.
DRAWING INDEX
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
PROJECT NARRATIVE
SKYWAY TOWERS PLANS TO BUILD A NEW WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
WHICH WILL INCLUDE A NEW MONOPOLE TOWER AND FENCED COMPOUND AS DEFINED
ON THIS PLAN SET. THE TOWER WILL BE DESIGNED WITH AVAILABLE SPACE ON THE
TOWER AND GROUND FOR (4) TENANTS /COLLOCATORS.
T-1
EE-1
EE-2
Z-1
Z-2
Z-3
C-1
C-2
L-1
S-1
S-2
S-3
E-1
E-2
E-3
G-1
G-2
ES-1
ES-2
ES-3
ES-4
ES-5
ES-6
TITLE SHEET
SURVEY DOCUMENT
SURVEY DOCUMENT
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN
AERIAL PLAN
COMPOUND PLAN
TOWER ELEVATION
LANDSCAPING PLAN
FENCE & SITE SIGNAGE DETAILS
ACCESS DRIVE GATE DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS & NOTES
OVERALL ELECTRICAL PLAN
COMPOUND ELECTRICAL PLAN
ELECTRICAL DETAILS
GROUNDING PLAN & NOTES
GROUNDING DETAILS
GRADING, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
COMPOUND GRADING PROFILE
ACCESS DRIVE GRADING PROFILE
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
CODE COMPLIANCE
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS
OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO
BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES.
·ANSI/TIA-222-G
·TIA 607
·INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEER 81
·IEEE C2 NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE LATEST ED.
·TELECORDIA GR-1275
·ANSI/T 311
·2018 NORTH CAROLINA BUILDING CODE
·2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
·2015 NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE
·2018 NC FIRE PREVENTION CODE
·AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE
·AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION
·MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION 13TH EDITION
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
FROM WILMINGTON, NC: GET ON I-40 W (SIGNS FOR I-140/NC-140/RALEIGH/JACKSONVILLE), TAKE EXIT 420B TO
MERGE ONTO NC-132 N/US-117 N/N COLLEGE RD, TURN RIGHT ONTO MURRAYVILLE RD, TURN RIGHT ONTO
PLANTATION RD, DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT.
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 2
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 3
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 4
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE
X
X
X
PLANTATION ROAD
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
R
A
M
P
(U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
(
U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
Z-1
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
NOTES:1) ALL SETBACKS SHOWN ARE FROM EXISTING TOWER CENTER TO EXISTING PROPERTY LINES.
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
ZONING MAP
SITE
PROPERTY LINE - ABUTTERS
PROPERTY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL
EXISTING WETLANDS
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING EASEMENT
LEGEND
JURISDICTION:
DIMENSION
FRONT YARD SETBACK:
SIDE YARD SETBACK:
(ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE IN FEET ± UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
REQUIRED ±
199.0'±
199.0'±
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
ZONING: R-15 _ RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
LOT AREA: 4.28 ± ACRES
ZONING INFORMATION
REAR YARD SETBACK:199.0'±
NEAREST RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE:-
EXISTING TREE LINE
PROPOSED ±
270.0'±
212.0'± & 213.0'±
250.8'±
870.0'±
GRAPHIC SCALE
050 25 50 100 200
1 INCH = 50 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 100 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 50' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 100' (11X17)
1
Z-1
OVERALL SITE PLAN
X X X X
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED LEASE AREA
PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK FENCE
(SEE NOTE 5 BELOW)
(SETBACK INFORMATION BELOW IS BASED ON UDO SECTION 4.3.3(C)(1)(a)(1),
SETBACKS FOR COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION FACILITIES IN
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS)
(PER UDO SECTION 4.3.3(C)(1)(a)(1), MINIMUM
SETBACK IN R-15 SHALL BE DISTANCE EQUAL
TO HEIGHT OF THE WIRELESS FACILITY)
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 5
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE
XX
X
X
X X
PLANTATION ROAD
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
R
A
M
P
(U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LO
D
LODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
L
O
D
L
O
D
LODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
Z-2
SITE PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
030 15 30 60 120
1 INCH = 30 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 60 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 30' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 60' (11X17)
1
Z-2
SITE PLAN
PROPERTY LINE - ABUTTERS
PROPERTY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL
EXISTING WETLANDS
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING EASEMENT
LEGEND
EXISTING TREE LINE
X X X
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED LEASE AREA
PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK FENCE
PROPOSED DISTURBED WETLANDSLO
D
LODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 6
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
XX
X
X
X X
PLANTATION ROAD
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
R
A
M
P
(U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LO
D
LODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
L
O
D
L
O
D
LODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
Z-3
AERIAL PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
030 15 30 60 120
1 INCH = 30 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 60 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 30' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 60' (11X17)
1
Z-3
AERIAL PLAN
PROPERTY LINE - ABUTTERS
PROPERTY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL
EXISTING WETLANDS
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING EASEMENT
LEGEND
EXISTING TREE LINE
X X X
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED LEASE AREA
PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK FENCE
PROPOSED DISTURBED WETLANDSLO
D
LODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
C-1
COMPOUND PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
05 2.5 5 10 20
1 INCH = 5 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 10 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 5' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 10' (11X17)
1
C-1
COMPOUND PLAN
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 8
C-2
TOWER
ELEVATION
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
·
·
·
GRAPHIC SCALE
012 6 12 24 48
1 INCH = 12 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 24 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 12' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 24' (11X17)
1
C-2
TOWER ELEVATION
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 9
X
X
XXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X X X
X
X
TREE PLANTING AND GUYING DETAIL
NTS
2
L-1
L-1
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
05 2.5 5 10 20
1 INCH = 5 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 10 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 5' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 10' (11X17)
1
L-1
LANDSCAPING PLAN
PLANTING SCHEDULE
BETULA NIGRA - RIVER BIRCH
QUANTITY BOTANICAL - COMMON NAME PLANTINGHEIGHT
6'
LANDSCAPE NOTES:
23
MATUREHEIGHT
40'
ILEX VERTICILLATA - COMMON WINTERBERRY 2'32 5'
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 10
TYPICAL SIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS
NTS
5
S-1
SKYWAY - SITE ID SIGN
NOTICE
NOTICE-RFE SIGN
24"HIGHx24" WIDE
(OPERATIONS PROVIDED)
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
SKYWAY SITE #: NC-08899
PLANTATION ROADWILMINGTON, NC 28409
FOR LEASE INFORMATION
CALL: 1-813-960-6211
24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE
CALL: 1-813-960-6211
FCC#: XXXXXXX
12"HIGHx18" WIDE
(OPERATIONS PROVIDED)
1 2
MUSHROOM STOP DETAIL
NTS
3
S-1
GATE KEEPER DETAIL
NTS
4
S-1
TYPICAL FENCE AND GATE DETAIL
NTS
1
S-1
OUTSI
D
E
O
F
COMP
O
U
N
D
S-1
FENCE & SITE
SIGNAGE DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
MULTI-LOCK DETAIL
NTS
2
S-1
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 11
ACCESS DRIVE GATE DETAIL
NTS
1
S-2
GATE KEEPER DETAIL
NTS
2
S-2
PL
A
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R GRAPHIC SCALE
010 5 10 20 40
1 INCH = 10 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 20 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 10' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 20' (11X17)
3
S-2
ACCESS DRIVE ENTRANCE PLAN S-2
ACCESS DRIVE
GATE DETAILS
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 12
X
X
GRAVEL COMPOUND DETAIL
NTS
3
S-3
PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TYPICAL SECTION
NTS
2
S-3
HANDHOLE DETAIL
NTS
1
S-3
S-3
CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 13
PLANTATION ROAD
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
R
A
M
P
(U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
UE UE UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UE
UT UT UT UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT UT UT UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
OE
E-1
OVERALL
ELECTRICAL PLAN
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
030 15 30 60 120
1 INCH = 30 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 60 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 30' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 60' (11X17)
1
E-1
OVERALL ELECTRICAL PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 14
UTUT
UE
UE
UE
UE
E-2
COMPOUND
ELECTRICAL PLAN
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
010 5 10 20 40
1 INCH = 10 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 20 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 10' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 20' (11X17)
1
E-2
OVERALL ELECTRICAL PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 15
UTILITY H-FRAME FRONT VIEW
NTS
1
E-3
UTILITY H-FRAME REAR VIEW
NTS
2
E-3
TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL
NTS
3
E-3
PROPOSED STUB-UP DETAIL
NTS
4
E-3 E-3
ELECTRICAL
DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 16
G-1
GROUNDING PLAN
& NOTES
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
05 2.5 5 10 20
1 INCH = 5 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 10 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 5' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 10' (11X17)
1
G-1
COMPOUND GROUNDING PLAN
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
GROUNDING LEGEND
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 17
GROUNDING RISER DIAGRAM
NTS
1
G-2
INSPECTION WELL DETAIL
NTS
5
G-2
GROUND BAR DETAIL
NTS
3
G-2
CADWELD GROUNDING CONNECTION DETAILS
NTS
6
G-2
TYPICAL GROUND BAR CONN DETAIL
NTS
2
G-2
TYPICAL GROUND ROD DETAIL
NTS
4
G-2
G-2
GROUNDING
DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 18
PLANTATION ROAD
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
R
A
M
P
(U
N
D
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
)
Mu
Le
ES-21
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LO
D
LODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
L
O
D
L
O
D
LODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
S
F
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SFS
F
S
F
SFSFSFSFSF
SF
SF
SF
SF SF SF SF SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
ES-1
EROSION &
SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
GRAPHIC SCALE
030 15 30 60 120
1 INCH = 30 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 60 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 30' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 60' (11X17)
1
ES-1
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
VICINITY MAP
SITE
Know what's below. Call before you dig.
R
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
PROPERTY LINE - SUBJECT PARCEL
LOD LOD PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE
X X X PROPOSED FENCE
PROPOSED LEASE AREA
EXISTING SOIL BOUNDARY
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
EXISTING WETLANDS
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 19
ES-2
COMPOUND
GRADING PROFILE
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
CUT(YD³) FILL(YD³)NET
0
0
44.5 44.5(FILL)
0 136.5 136.5(FILL)
AREA
0 76.5 76.5(FILL)
0 120.0 120.0(FILL)
CUT(YD³) FILL(YD³)NET
ROAD
COMPOUND
OVERALL SITE CUT AND FILL
ROAD
COMPOUND
MATERIAL
SURFACECOARSEBASE
COARSE
SOIL
SURFACE
COARSE
SOIL
WETLAND SITE CUT AND FILL
44.5 44.5(FILL)
SURFACECOARSE
SURFACE
COARSE
BASE
COARSE
SOIL
SOIL
AREA
0
0
0
0
84.4 84.4(FILL)
30.0 251.6 251.6(FILL)
84.4 84.4(FILL)
76.5 76.5(FILL)
120.0 120.0(FILL)
2,718 0.062
AREA
COMPOUND 2,704 0.062
ROAD GRAVEL
PERMANENT WETLAND DISTURBED AREA
(FT²) (ACRES)
GROUND
COVER
(FT²) (ACRES)
GROUNDCOVER
GRAVEL
GRADED/
SEEDED
ALL
12,975
17,325
0.298
0.398
TEMPORARY WETLAND DISTURBED AREA
STAGING
AREA
TOTAL
AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE
05 2.5 5 10 20
1 INCH = 5 FEET (22X34)
1 INCH = 10 FEET (11X17)
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 5' (22X34)SCALE: 1" = 10' (11X17)
1
ES-2
COMPOUND GRADING PROFILE
·
·
·
·
GRAVEL 4,350 0.100COMBINED
AREA
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 20
ES-3
ACCESS ROAD
PROFILE
ACCESS ROAD PROFILE 1
ES-3
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
³³
³³
OVERALL SITE CUT AND FILL
WETLAND SITE CUT AND FILL PERMANENT WETLAND DISTURBED AREA
TEMPORARY WETLAND DISTURBED AREA
·
·
·
·
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 21
ES-4
EROSION &
SEDIMENT
CONTROL NOTES
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 22
TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AND MAINTENANCE
NTS
3
ES-5
SF SUPER SILT FILTER FABRIC FENCE
NTS
1
ES-5
PROPOSED TEMPORARY SEEDING
(NCESCH 6.10.1) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FALL
7
ES-5
PROPOSED TEMPORARY SEEDING
(NCESCH 6.10.1) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LATE WINTER TO EARLY SPRING
5
ES-5
PROPOSED TEMPORARY SEEDING
(NCESCH 6.10.1) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUMMER
6
ES-5
CONCRETE WASHDOWN AREA DETAIL
NTS
2
ES-5
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
NTS
4
ES-5
TP
ES-5
EROSION &
SEDIMENT
CONTROL DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 23
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NTS
1
ES-6
PROPOSED PERMANANT SEEDING
(NCESCH 6.11.1)
2
ES-6
ES-6
EROSION &
SEDIMENT
CONTROL DETAILS
SKYWAY SITE ID: NC-08899
SKYWAY SITE NAME: MURRAYVILLE
PLANTATION ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
3637 MACADALA LANE
TAMPA, FL 33618
(813) 960-6200
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
DE
S
I
G
N
R
E
C
O
R
D
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
A
M
P
SIT
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SH
E
E
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV BY
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
AP
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
0 09/30/22 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OP
6095 MARSHALEE DRIVE, SUITE 300ELKRIDGE, MD 21075(410) 712-7092
TKK ENGINEERING P.C.LICENCE NO. C-4682
BRADLEY R. NEWMAN, P.E.
NC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LIC. #38681
Planning Board - January 5, 2023
ITEM: 4 - 9 - 24