HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ23-06 March 30 Planning Board Staff Report - UpdateZ23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 1 of 17
STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-06
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z23-06
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional RMF-M district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Giovanni Ippolito & Tanya Vlacancich
Location: Acreage:
6634 Carolina Beach Road 4.56
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R08200-001-036-000 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped 72 Unit Multi-Family Residential
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15, Residential (CZD) RMF-M
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Religious Institution R-15
East Single-Family Residential R-15
South Single-Family Residential R-15
West Religious Institution and Single-Family Residential R-15
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 2 of 17
ZONING HISTORY
April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 4)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Water and sanitary sewer services are available through CFPUA by
extension of public utility mains
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire
District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station 19
Schools Ashley High School, Murray Middle School, Anderson Elementary School
Recreation Veterans Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation Developer delineated wetlands on the property.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 3 of 17
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to construct six three-story, 12-unit multi-family structures totaling
a maximum of 72 units. The concept plan includes an amenity center, recreation area, and
open space.
• The proposed maximum building height is 40 feet.
• The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan shows the multi-family structures and amenity
center in a circular formation towards the center of the parcel. The parking area circles the
buildings providing an additional spatial buffer between the multi-family units and
neighboring residential uses.
Proposed Right Turn Lane
Amenity Center
Proposed Stormwater
12 Unit, 3 story Multi-
Family Structures
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 4 of 17
• A sidewalk is proposed along the interior of the parking area providing an additional
pedestrian recreational amenity.
• The development also proposes a continuous right turn lane off Carolina Beach Road through
to the existing turn lane onto Glenarthur Drive. The proposed turn lane must be reviewed
and permitted by NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) before construction.
• In addition to required lighting standards listed in Section 5.5 of the UDO, the development
has proposed the following additional condition:
o Exterior lighting, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or
shielded so as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an imaginary
line extended from the light sources parallel to the ground. Fixtures shall be
numbered such that adequate levels of lighting are maintained, but that light
spillage and glare are not directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or
motorists. Light posts shall be no taller than twelve (12) feet.
• The applicant originally proposed a maximum height of 16 feet for light poles. Following
the community meeting held March 14 the applicant has reduced the maximum height to 12
feet.
• An additional condition related to tree protection and visual screening was added following
the March 14 community meeting: Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to the onset
of land clearing and grading along a minimum 15-foot offset from the edge of the outer
drive. No disturbance of existing vegetation or grading will be permitted. Prior to the
Certificate of Occupancy, a minimum 8-foot-tall solid wood screening fence shall be
installed along a 3-foot offset from the driveway pavement.
• The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan indicates 1.37 acres, approximately 30% of the
site, will be preserved as open space, exceeding the UDO requirement of 20% open space.
• The applicant has also proposed a condition to reserve 10 percent, or eight (8) total units,
whichever is greater, of the multi-family units for workforce housing. The condition has been
reviewed by the county’s Long Range Planning division and legal department to ensure
there are adequate measures for monitoring and compliance.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15
district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed
at low densities. Since that time, public and private water and sewer services have become
available to the surrounding area; however, the Carolina Beach corridor remains primarily
zoned for low density housing.
• While the site is zoned R-15, the Carolina Beach Road corridor has seen increased interest
in higher density residential and commercial development such as the Myrtle Landing
townhomes to the north and the Coral Ridge Subdivision to the south of the subject site.
• As currently zoned, the site would be permitted up to 12 dwelling units at a density of 2.5
du/ac under the performance development standards. The proposed 72 units equate to an
overall density of 15.7 du/ac.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 5 of 17
• The RMF-M district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate density
single and multi-family development. The intent of the district is to function as a transitional
district between intensive nonresidential development and higher density residential areas.
The district is designed to provide a reasonable range of choice, type, and location of
housing units.
• The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) does not prescribe a specific height per story,
however the maximum height of the proposed development is limited to a maximum building
height of 3 stories and 40 feet.
• The proposed development uses the parking lot as an additional perimeter buffer between
the proposed multi-family structures and the existing residential uses.
• The UDO contains controls on exterior lighting on the site. The maximum illumination levels
at the common property line with the residential properties to the west shall not exceed 0.5-
foot candles and 1.0-foot candles at the northern property line adjacent to the religious
institution.
• A Type-A opaque buffer meeting the standards of Table 5.4.3.B.2 is required along the
property lines adjoining neighboring single-family development.
• To meet the proposed density the development must connect to public water and sewer at
the nearest connection to the south at Glenarthur Drive.
• If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee (TRC) and zoning
compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and
specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved
conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 6 of 17
AREA DEVELOPMENTS
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 7 of 17
TRANSPORTATION
CURRENT CONDITIONS
Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning would allow a maximum
of 12 single-family dwelling units.
PROPOSED ACCESS
Primary Access South Carolina Beach Road
Secondary Access N/A
EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Affected Roadway South Carolina Beach Road
Type of Roadway NCDOT major arterial
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 8 of 17
Roadway Planning Capacity
(AADT) 41,368
Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 35,500
Latest WMPO Point-in-Time
Count (DT) 36,509
Current Level of Congestion Nearing Capacity
Sources
Source of Planning Capacity: WMPO
Source of Latest Traffic Volume: NCDOT (2021)
Source of WMPO Point-in-Time County: WMPO (2022)
NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADAWAY PROJECTS
No Nearby STIP Projects
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic Generated by
Present Designation
Traffic Generated
by Proposed
Designation
Potential
Impact of
Proposed
Designation
AM Peak Hour Trips 11 45 +34
PM Peak Hour Trips 14 52 +38
Assumptions
Typical Development with Existing Conditions – 12 single family
detached dwellings
Proposed Development – 72 unit multi-family development
Sources Source of Trip Generation: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)
The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the
ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
SUMMARY
The proposed project is located along a major arterial highway that is currently nearing capacity.
The proposed access is located north of the entrance to the Lord’s Creek community and between
two nearby U-turn movements on Carolina Beach Road. Currently there are no State Transportation
Improvement Projects (STIP) identified in the immediate area to address current conditions. Several
other projects are currently under review or development in the vicinity, and while their traffic impact
analyses did not take this proposal into account, all were developed to account for general traffic
growth in the area. The proposed project’s peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold
requiring a traffic impact analysis, but NCDOT will review the project through the driveway
permitting process.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 9 of 17
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or the Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Lords Creek and Drains to ICW6 watersheds.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class I (Suitable), Class II (Moderate Limitation), and Class III (Severe
Limitation) soils; however, the project is expected to be served by CFPUA if developed.
• The proposed concept plan has identified wetlands on the southwestern portion of the site.
The identified wetlands are outside the development area of the project and the applicant
has provided a 25-foot setback from the wetlands.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Schools
• Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary
School, Murray Middle School, and Ashley High School. Students may apply to attend
public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
• A maximum of 12 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base
density, and 72 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an
increase of 60 dwelling units.
• Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in
homes would result in approximately 13 additional students than would be generated under
current zoning.
• The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield
as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students.
Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated
by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and
2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential
units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to
only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the recent
New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study.
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield
(current general student generation rate) *
Existing Development Undeveloped Approximate** Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
Typical Development Under
Current Zoning 12 residential units Approximate** Total: 3
(1 elementary, 1 middle, 1 high)
Proposed Zoning 72 residential units Approximate** Total: 16
(6 elementary, 3 middle, 5 high)
*The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student
enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there a re an
average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.0 7 for high) generated per
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 10 of 17
dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out -
of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech.
**Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields
with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are
rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the
approximate total.
• Since the residential components associated with the proposed rezoning are likely to have
a build-out date within 5 years, staff has outlined existing school capacity to provide a
general idea of the potential impact on public schools.
• Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the
potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity
upgrades.
School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year)
*Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or
planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools
to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may
be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time.
• The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC
Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data,
planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result
in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded.
New Hanover County Strategic Plan
• One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018 – 2023 is to
encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by
increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services.
• The proposed RMF-M CZD zoning district would allow for an increase in housing diversity.
• The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 73%. Under the
proposed RMF-M district the site would allow for multi-family residential (apartments) and
increase housing type diversity by reducing the percentage of single family detached (73%
to 72%) and increase the percentage of multi-family units (10% to 11%).
• The subject property is located in the Veterans Park community area, where 60% of
residents currently live within one mile of a convenience (grocery store, retail staples,
pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor’s office, child & adult care,
Level
Total
NHC
Capacity
School
Projected
Enrollment of
Assignment
School
Capacity of
Assigned
School
w/Portables
Capacity of
Assigned
School
Funded or
Planned
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 91% Anderson 291 314 93% None
Middle 92% Murray 882 889 99% None
High 93% Ashley 1983 1990 100% None
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 11 of 17
etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum, etc.). Under the proposed RMF-
M district, there would be no change to the percent of residences within one mile of goods
and services.
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of R-15:
Woods Edge in Monkey Junction
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 12 of 17
Hidden Valley in Monkey Junction
Representative Developments of Multi-Family Apartments:
Amberleigh Shores in Ogden
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 13 of 17
Stephens Pointe in Porters Neck
Context and Compatibility
• The property is located adjacent to Carolina Beach Road with right-in / right-out access to
the highway.
• The property is located south of Veterans Park and the elementary, middle, and high schools
however there is no pedestrian infrastructure in place and all traffic must travel south
approximately 1,800 feet to a U-turn movement on Carolina Beach Road to travel north.
• The subject property is one of several undeveloped tracts along Carolina Beach Road and
acts as a buffer between the highway and lower density single-family development to the
west.
• Most of the surrounding land is either undeveloped or used for single-family development
and religious institutions.
• The subject property is bordered by the Lord’s Creek Subdivision to the west and a religious
institution to the north.
• Due to the size of the parcel and access onto Carolina Beach Road, the property is less
likely to be developed with lower density detached single family housing.
• The proposed concept plan positions a portion of the stormwater facilities closer to the
existing single-family homes to the south of the site. A perimeter parking lot around the
development acts as an additional spatial buffer between the multi-family dwellings and
neighboring homes.
• In addition to the setback and buffer requirements of the UDO, the applicant has agreed
to additional exterior lighting conditions to reduce the potential impact on neighboring
residential uses.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 14 of 17
• In the county’s work on housing affordability staff has discussed whether the provision of
workforce housing could allow for additional density on a project. While this has not
historically been used to consider consistency or compatibility, the applicant has provided
an additional condition related to workforce housing to require 10 percent, or eight (8)
units, whichever is greater, of the total units be dedicated for workforce housing for a
minimum of 15 years.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and
visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use,
recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family
residential.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 15 of 17
Analysis
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Mixed Use,
a land use classification that promotes a mix of retail, office, and residential
development at moderate densities up to 15 units per acre. This
classification is generally applied to areas intended as community-level
service nodes and / or transitions between lower density housing and higher
intensity development.
At 15.7 du/ac, the proposed maximum density for the development is
slightly higher than the recommendation for the place type. The additional
0.7 du/ac equals approximately 4 additional multi-family units than would
be allowed at 15 du/ac. Site features such as landscaping buffers, parking,
and stormwater facilities have been located along the boundaries of the
project adjacent to existing single-family development to provide a
transition between the residential uses. An additional voluntary condition
by the applicant also ensures workforce housing affordability for 10
percent of the units, or 8 total units whichever is greater, for a period of 15
years.
The Community Mixed Use place type specifically identifies the Carolina
Beach Road corridor as appropriate for the place type and recommends
higher-intensity mixed use with first floor retail and office and housing
above, with a building height range of 1 to 3 stories.
The RMF-M district is intended to act as a transitional district between
residential and commercial development. The proposed project would
provide a buffer between the highway and single-family development.
Consistency
Recommendation
While at a higher density than generally recommended for the Community
Mixed Use place type, the proposed rezoning request is generally
CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s intent for development
to act as a transition between major roadways and higher intensity uses and
existing residential areas and providing a range of housing types,
opportunities, and choices. An additional voluntary condition by the
applicant also ensures workforce housing affordability for 10 percent of
the units, or 8 total units whichever is greater, for a period of 15 years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan,
zoning considerations, and technical review. The Carolina Beach Road corridor has been
designated as Community Mixed Use within the Comprehensive Plan. The plan recommends a
mix of commercial uses and residential housing types that act as a transition between higher
intensity and lower intensity development and identifies the scale of the recommended
development as up to 3 stories and 15 du/ac.
The scale of the proposed development conforms with the recommendations for the place type
and would act as a buffer between Carolina Beach Road and lower density residential
development to the west. The applicant has provided an additional lighting condition to mitigate
potential impacts on adjacent properties, additional roadway improvements for existing and
proposed development, and a condition for workforce housing affordability increasing housing
diversity and rental options in the area.
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 16 of 17
As a result, Staff recommends approval of the request and suggests the following motion:
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be generally
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because while
the proposed density of the development slightly exceeds the recommendation for the
Community Mixed Use place type, the development scale is in line with the plan’s
recommendation and would provide additional housing diversity in the area. I find
recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because it provides an alternative housing type that acts as a buffer for lower
density residential contributing to the kind of transitional development desired along
highway corridors. An additional voluntary condition by the applicant also ensures
workforce housing affordability for 10 percent of the units, or 8 total units, whichever
is greater for a period of 15 years.
Proposed Conditions:
1. Exterior lighting, including luminaries and security lights, shall be arranged or
shielded so as not to cast illumination in an upward direction above an imaginary
line extended from the light sources parallel to the ground. Fixtures shall be
numbered such that adequate levels of lighting are maintained, but that light
spillage and glare are not directed at adjacent property, neighboring areas, or
motorists. Light posts shall be no taller than twelve (12) feet.
2. The proposed right turn lane must be approved and permitted by NCDOT. Changes
to the concept plan to meet NCDOT requirements for the turn lane may be approved
administratively by county staff.
3. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to the onset of land clearing and
grading along a minimum 15-foot offset from the edge of the outer drive. No
disturbance of existing vegetation or grading will be permitted. Prior to the
Certificate of Occupancy, a minimum 8-foot-tall solid wood screening fence shall be
installed along a 3-foot offset from the driveway pavement.
4. The project will include a minimum of 10% of the units or eight (8) total units,
whichever is greater, as workforce housing units that will be made available for a
period of no less than 15 years with rental limits based upon HUD HIGH HOME
standards. An agreement between the developer and county will be required
before the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the project. The agreement
shall specify:
• The number of affordable units provided;
• The income limits;
• Rent limits subject to annual change;
• The period of time workforce housing units must remain affordable;
• Any other criteria necessary for compliance and monitoring;
• An established timeframe for annual reporting from the developer or owner
of the development to New Hanover County. Annual reports shall provide the
following minimum information:
o Unit number
o Bedroom number
Z23-06 Staff Report PB 3.30.2023 Page 17 of 17
o Household size
o Tenant income
o Rent rate
• The developer or owner of the development shall report any mid-year lease
changes to workforce housing units to New Hanover County to ensure lease
changes remain compliant with the agreement.
If the total number of workforce housing units falls below the minimum of 10% of the
units or eight (8) total units whichever is greater before the expiration of the minimum
15-year period of affordability the development will be subject to enforcement
measures found in Article 12 Violations and Enforcement of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
Alternative Motion for Denial (If based on information presented at the public hearing or other
consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds denial appropriate.)
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be INCONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density
of the development exceeds the density recommended for the Community Mixed Use
place type. I also find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because the number of multi-family structures and associated
parking reduces the amount of available open space and increases traffic on the
roadway network.