Loading...
4-19-2023 TRC Agenda Full1 TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA April 19, 2023 New Hanover County’s Technical Review Committee (TRC) will meet Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. to discuss the below items. PLEASE NOTE: This meeting will be conducted remotely via teleconference. Interested parties can contact the Planning and Land Use Department at 910-798-7165 for more information. Item 1: 8232 Market St- Take 5 Car Wash – SITECN-23-000017 Request by Rebecca McAllister with Boing US Holdco, Inc. on behalf of Hutson and Nieper Enterprises, LLC to redevelop the property at 8232 Market St into a car wash. The site is 1.51 acres and is zoned B-1. The engineer is Ethan Mindrebo with Pennoni and Associates (emindrebo@pennoni.com). The planner assigned is Amy Doss (adoss@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7571). Item 2: 2830 US HWY 421 N – The Yard Industrial Park – SITECN-23-000018 Request by Any Mueller with BL Companies on behalf of Daniel Schor/2830 Highway 421 Owners, LLC, for an industrial park. The site is 80 acres and is zoned I-2. The engineer is Andy Mueller, (amueller@blcompanies.com). The Planner assigned is Amy Doss (adoss@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7571) Item 3: Woodlake Subdivision Traffic Calming Device Request Request by Jess Anderson and the Woodlake Homeowners Association for consideration of a traffic study in support of traffic calming device(s) on the private Ontario Road. The engineer is Peng Zhu with Trans Systems (pzhu@transystems.com). The planner assigned is Robert Farrell (rfarrell@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7164) Item 4: Sketch Plan Review- Sidbury Road RV Park – 8102, 8104, 8106 Sidbury Road Request by Doug Grant (catadjusterdoug@gmail.com) and Dan Weeks with H+W Design (dweeks@h- wdesign.com) for sketch plan review of a proposed RV park on Sidbury Road. The site is comprised of three parcels and is zoned R-15, totaling approximately 19.61 acres. The planner assigned is Julian Griffee (jgriffee@nhcgov.com) This meeting is open to the public by calling 1-336-218-2051 and entering Phone Conference ID: 436 156 300# Take 5 Car Wash – 8232 Market St – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 1 To: Rebecca McAllister (Rebecca.mcallister@drivenbrands.com) From: Amy Doss Current Planner Date: April 19th TRC Review PID#: R03600-005-042-000 Egov# SITECN-23-000017 Subject: 8232 Market St – Take Five Car Wash – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review The following comments have been received for the April 19th, 2023 TRC meeting. Additional comments may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions. Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval. Planning, Amy Doss 910-798-7571 1. Zoning – B-1, Neighborhood Business a. Use: The defined use is CAR WASH: A facility for washing or steam cleaning passenger automobiles (including self-service operations), operating either as a separate facility or when installed and operating in conjunction with another use, and which installation includes equipment customarily associated with a car wash and which is installed solely for the purposed of washing and cleaning automobiles. 2. General comments a. Please refer to Section 3.4.3.D of the UDO for B-1 dimensional standards, specifically the side interior setbacks and the building height. When adjacent to commercial districts the side and rear setbacks are 0’ and the height is 2 stories or 40’. b. Please show sight triangles at points of ingress and egress. 3. Tree Retention: Tree Removal Permit has been received and will be processed. a. Staff has received the tree removal plan and associated tables with calculations. Please submit a Tree Removal Permit application to accompany the tree removal plan. b. Please be aware that a Tree Removal Permit is required prior to any land disturbance activities. Please provide the specific species (Loblolly Pine, Long Leaf Pine, etc.) of the trees to be removed or retained to determine required mitigation. 4. Lighting: a. Please note that with the latest update to the UDO, a lighting plan is not required at time of TRC Approval. Thank you for your submittal of a lighting plan, please include site Take 5 Car Wash – 8232 Market St – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 2 boundaries so that the photometrics can be measured at the property line. See below excerpt from Section 5.5.3: i. Information about the exterior lighting for the site that demonstrates compliance with the standards in this section shall be submitted in conjunction with an application for site plan approval (Section 10.3.6, Site Plan) or zoning compliance approval (Section 10.3.8, Zoning Compliance Approval), whichever comes first, approved no later than at time of construction plan approval. 5. Landscaping: a. The landscape plan appears to sufficiently address County requirements. Please include the square footage of the foundation plantings provided. 6. Signs: a. Please note that all signs are subject to section 5.6 of the UDO. b. Please submit for sign permits prior to installation. 7. Parking: a. Please note that required parking per UDO Table 5.1.2.A is 3 spaces for every one car the car wash can accommodate at one time. Fire Services, David Stone 910-798-7458 1. All new structures must comply with Appendix J of the NC Fire Code, Building Information Signs. An example can be provided upon request. 2. If there is no fire hydrant within 400 feet of the structure a fire hydrant will need to be added. Sprinklered building shall have a fire hydrant located within 100 feet of the FDC. 3. Fire Hydrants a. All fire hydrants shall have a 5 ¼ inch barrel, a 5 ¼ inch valve opening, two 2 ½ inch NST side discharges and a 5 inch pumper nozzle with a 5 inch STORZ connection. Further information on the technical specifications is available from the fire code official or Cape Fear Public Utility Authority. b. All fire hydrants shall be installed so they are visible from the fire apparatus access road with unobstructed access and a clear space no less than 36 inches in all directions. They shall be protected from vehicle impact by curbing, guard posts or other means approved by the fire code official. They shall be oriented with the large discharge facing the nearest street. All discharges shall meet the NFPA requirements for distance above grade. c. Additional fire hydrants may be required by the fire code official based on the type of hazard or use of the protected structure. (Appendix C) d. Fire Department connections shall utilize 5 inch Storz connections with a 30 degree down angle. Remote FDC’s are discouraged. e. A fire hydrant shall be located no greater than 100 feet from the fire department connection. For buildings with multiple fire department connections, each one shall have a dedicated fire hydrant. f. The fire department connection shall be located that the fire apparatus and the hoses connecting it to the fire hydrant and to the fire department connection do not obstruct access to the buildings for other fire apparatus. Take 5 Car Wash – 8232 Market St – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 3 g. Fire department connections are to be unobstructed with 36 inches clearance to both sides and 78 inches vertically. h. An audible/visual device indicating water flow or fire alarm activation shall be located above the fire department connection. i. The fire department connection shall be labeled with code compliant signage indicating the type of connection and where more than one fire department connection exists additional signage is required to indicate the area protected. NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072 1. A land disturbing revision to existing permit GP 12-98 and a stormwater permit issued by the County are required for this project. Please submit for permits as the design is completed. Stormwater permitting will be limited to conveyance permitting only. Pre and post development storm attenuation will not be required. 2. It appears the project lies within an existing State stormwater, SW8 980236. Please check with the State DEQ office for permit modifications requirements. Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620 1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only. 2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package, upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-Review-103. 3. CFPUA water and sewer available. 4. CFPUA plan review required. 5. CFPUA Meter Sizing Form will be required. 6. Location currently has CFPUA water and sewer. If existing water and sewer services are not used, they will need to be properly abandoned. Water will need to be abandoned at the main. 7. It appears a NCDOT Encroachment will be required. 8. Additional Notes: CFPUA does not allow half size services. Irrigation tap will need to be 1” or 2”. Sewer service will need to be 6”. NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-398-9100 These preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed site and are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information. Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site. 1. NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT Online Portal. https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx 2. A NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and 15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road. Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office 3. A NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or installations within NCDOT right-of-way. 4. Show/Label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles. 5. No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles. Take 5 Car Wash – 8232 Market St – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 4 6. No obstructions shall be placed with the stopping site distance. Reference table 3-1 (for level roadways only). 7. Driveway will need to be paved from edge of pavement to r/w line (minimum). 8. The Radii needs to be adjusted to accommodate the fire truck turning in from the right lane, it is now showing that it is coming across two lanes of traffic and entering the site into exiting traffic. 9. The garbage truck auto-turn is the same, it is cutting across two lanes of traffic to enter into the site. Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732 1. Site is on a well. This well must be properly abandoned by a certified well driller prior to demolition. Public water must be obtained for this site. 2. Site is on sewer and does not impede on any other septic systems for surrounding properties. WMPO, Jamar Johnson 910-473-5130 1. Please revise site driveway. Turning templates show the design vehicles performing conflicting movements for site ingress. Take 5 Car Wash – 8232 Market St – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 5 Brad Shaver USACOE Brad.E.Shaver@usace.army.mil 1. No comments. Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443 1. No comments. Comments not received at this time from: Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still NCDEQ, Chad Coburn New Hanover Soil & Water, Dru Harrison USACE, Rachel Capito NCDEMLR, Dan Sams DCM, Tanya Pietila The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 1 To: Andy Mueller – BL Companies (amueller@blcompanies.com) From: Amy Doss Current Planner Date: April 19, 2023 Energov #: SITECN-23-000018 PID: R04000-003-013-000, R04000-003-020-000, R04000-0030018-000, R04000-003-021- 000, R04000-003-019-000 Subject: The Yard – Warehouses – 2840 Highway 421 – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review The following comments have been received for the April 19, 2023, TRC meeting. Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised site plan addressing each of the below items must be resubmitted prior to receiving approval. Planning, Amy Doss 910-798-7571 Please update the plan with the following general corrections: 1. Zoning: I-2, Heavy Industrial. 2. Use: The defined use is WAREHOUSING: The storing of goods, wares, and merchandise within an enclosed building, whether for the owners or others. There is little on-site sales activity with the customer present. Uses include: cold storage facilities (including frozen food lockers); distribution warehouses (used primarily for temporary storage pending distribution in response to customer orders); storage warehouses (used for storage by retail stores such as furniture and appliance stores); warehouse storerooms; or similar uses. 3. General Comments: a. Please change the title to Commercial Site Plan. b. Please label ADA accessible ramps on sidewalks. c. Please show the location of all signs and note any proposed sign is subject to Section 5.6. of the UDO. Thank you for providing the sign legend, are any additional signs proposed at this time? d. Please label all open spaces. e. Please label all fences and walls used for screening or decorative purposes (including height and material). Perimeter fence detail provided on DN-2, are any other fences proposed? The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 2 f. Please ensure all loading spaces, dumpsters, outdoor storage areas, and ground level mechanical equipment are clearly labeled. g. Please label all pedestrian circulation areas including sidewalks. h. Please label water and sewer services (including type, size). i. Please label wells and septic systems including repair area. j. Please label all storm pipes, sewer pipes, water pipes, underground utilities, manholes, monitoring wells, and drainage features. k. Please label stormwater management features. l. Please label fire hydrants and fire apparatus access to buildings. m. Please label all radii. 4. Landscape notes: a. Please provide a detailed landscape plan schedule illustrating the requirements for interior landscaping, street yards, foundation planting, and buffers have been met. Specifically, foundation planting calculations are not shown on the site plan. 5. Tree Retention: a. Please be aware that a Tree Removal Permit is required prior to any land disturbance activities. Please provide the specific species (Loblolly Pine, Long Leaf Pine, etc.) of the trees to be removed or retained to determine required mitigation. b. Please apply for a Tree Removal Permit if any trees are proposed to be removed. c. Please note Section 5.3.7.E of the County’s UDO may apply. Properties zoned I-2 located along the Hwy 421 corridor between the Isabel Holmes Bridge to the south, the Pender County line to the north, the Cape Fear River to the west, and the Northeast Cape Fear River to the east are not required to mitigate removed Significant and Specimen trees within the development envelope of a project as long as existing tree coverage outside the development envelope is retained in accordance with Table 5.3.7.E below. Such areas of retained trees must be in a strip or patch and be depicted and labeled on approved site plans. These properties shall still meet all requirements of Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering or, if the Planning Director determines that required plantings cannot be accommodated on the site, pay an in-lieu fee as described in D above. d. Please clearly illustrate what trees are being preserved and what trees are proposed to remain. e. All specimen trees located within subject tract are required to be illustrated as well. UDO Section 5.3.5.C The removal of any specimen tree is prohibited on any parcel unless exempt according to Section 10.3.11, Variance Zoning and Subdivision. If a specimen tree is removed without a permit, the penalty for this violation shall be twice the mitigation fee. f. Please be aware that there are optional incentives for retaining trees on site, UDO Section 5.3.8.A.2. g. Please see the chart below indicating the documented, significant, and specimen trees regulated by the County. The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 3 h. Per UDO Section 5.3.4.C, of the UDO requires a minimum of 15 trees at least 2” DBH must be retained or planted on the parcel where development occurs for each acre or proportionate area disturbed. Please add a note to the Landscape Plan showing has this requirement has been met. Please note that required landscaping for the project can be credited to meet this requirement, however, required landscaping does not count towards mitigation, if applicable. i. Per UDO Section 5.3.6.B, please be aware that prior to any construction activity protection fencing is required around protected trees or tree stands. The fencing shall be a minimum of four feet and shall remain in place through completion of construction activities. j. Tree inventory plans are required to reflect the trees being retained and the trees being removed clearly. Please see the example below, which illustrate the trees with the X’s being removed and the trees and the trees being preserved showing the protection in the correct placement. k. Please include the tree data within a table as shown below. The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 4 6. Please be aware that no building permit will be issued until NCDOT has issued the Driveway Permit approval. 7. Parking/Loading: a. Please provide a typical parking space detail to demonstrate dimensions comply with UDO Table 5.1.4.B. b. Please provide dimensions of parking lot aisle to demonstrate compliance with UDO Table 5.1.4.B. c. Please show the location of any off-street loading berths if present on site, please refer to Section 5.1.5 of the UDO for the specifications. 8. Lighting: a. Before the building permit can be issued, a lighting plan must be provided to illustrate that street lighting, all exterior lighting, and indoor lighting visible from outside shall be designed and located so that the maximum illumination measured in foot candles at ground level at a residential lot line does not surpass 0.5, UDO Section 5.5. Please refer to Table 5.5.4.B of the UDO for additional standards. Provide documentation from the lighting provider stating they will provide a lighting plan to comply with the County’s UDO standards as stated above. Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448 1. Tree Line Properties - The Yard - 2830 N US HWY 421 - Large Warehouse Complex 2. I have rereviewed the site. The only outstanding issue is to adding an additional fire hydrant on the backside of the 112,954 sq. ft on the 12 inch fire line fireline. Not knowing what will be stored now or down the road in the future this will meet County Fire’s needs, including fire hydrant numbers. NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072 1. A land disturbing and a stormwater permit issued by the County are required for this project. Please submit for permits as the design is completed. Please check with NC DEQ for the requirements of a state stormwater permit. 2. The existing offsite stormwater drainage coming from the north and west qualifies for NHC Stormwater Services maintenance. A public drainage easement sized in accordance with NHC Stormwater Manual will be required. Any construction of the offsite drainage conveyance measures that will be maintained by the county will need to be observed during construction by Stormwater Services and a turnover meeting scheduled once the system is ready to be conveyed to the county. Please add a plan note to ensure county construction observation and a turnover meeting occurs. Note, should the applicant elect to maintain the offsite drainage themselves, deed restrictions shall indicate the operation and maintenance roles and responsibilities for any conveyance measures required for offsite drainage. Should the design include the offsite drainage, then the comment is moot. The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 5 Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620 1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only. 2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package, upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-Review-103. 3. CFPUA water via a mainline extension; sewer available via forcemain to forcemain connection. 4. Project is currently in CFPUA plan review. NCDOT, Nick Drees/Mike Frank, 910-398-9100 1. A NCDOT Driveway permit has been submitted to NCDOT for review. a. Further discussion will be needed for any associated improvements that may be required. 2. No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles. 3. Show/Label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles. 4. No obstructions shall be placed with the stopping site distance. Reference table 3-1 (for level roadways only). 5. Driveway will need to be paved from edge of pavement to r/w line (minimum). 6. A NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or installations within NCDOT right-of-way. 7. We need to see the width of the driveways. 8. Need to see an auto turn for WB-67 for any proposed driveway. 9. Are the entrances to be used as one is for trucks and one is for cars? 10. Need to show the proposed circulation for vehicles. Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732 1. Application states the site will connect to CFPUA water. Any existing wells on site must be identified, protected during any demolition and properly abandoned. Proposed infrastructure such as pump stations, force mains, storm water ponds or ditching must maintain setbacks to any surrounding properties wells. The restaurant will need to submit plans and gain approvals/permitting through Environmental Health Food Protection Division. 2. Application states the site will connect to CFPUA sewer. Any existing septic systems on site must be identified and properly abandoned. Proposed infrastructure such as storm water ponds or ditching must maintain setbacks to any surrounding properties septic systems. The Yard – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review Page | 6 WMPO, Jamar Johnson 910-343-3915 Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443 1. Each new building and electric meter will need an address. 2. Contact Planning for address assignments following TRC approval. USACE, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 1. The site has an old Jurisdictional Determination (JD) from 2005 that technically expired in 2010. The site plan reflects the previously approved line and the Corps would have no comments provided that all of the work stayed within existing disturbed limits. If the new disturbance steps outside that it may be beneficial to have the line spot checked and updated to make sure there are no changes. Comments not received at this time from: Emergency Services & E911, Steven Still NCDEQ, Chad Coburn New Hanover Soil & Water, Dru Harrison NCDEMLR, Dan Sams DCM, Tanya Pietila New Hanover County Schools, Laura Severt Woodlake Subdivision Traffic Calming Device Request – TRC Review Page | 1 To: Peng Zhu – (pzhu@transystems.com) From: Robert Farrell, Senior Planner Date: April 11, 2023 Egov# N/A Subject: Woodlake Subdivision Traffic Calming Device Request – TRC Review Planning, Robert Farrell 910-798-7164 Section 6.2.2.O requires the following information be provided for a Traffic Calming Device application for an existing street: 1. The road is privately owned and maintained with a functional classification of local road or neighborhood collector. The road is privately owned and is classified as a local road or neighborhood collector. 2. The roadway is “primarily residential,” with at least 75 percent of the properties fronting on the street being located in a residential zoning district and / or residential land uses. The street is residential with 100 percent of the properties in a residential zoning district or used residentially. 3. Fifteen (15) percent of present day traffic exceeds 30 mph. Traffic study shows less than 15 percent of present day traffic exceeds 30 mph. 4. Traffic volumes on the affected street must be less than 4,000 vehicles per day. Applicant’s traffic study shows an average of less than 1000 vehicles per day. 5. The street is not a primary access route for emergency response. Will need confirmation from Emergency Services Woodlake Subdivision Traffic Calming Device Request – TRC Review Page | 2 6. An active property owners association exists to install and maintain traffic calming device(s). A property owners association exists and has expressed willingness to install and maintain traffic calming devices. 7. A previous traffic calming device application has not been denied within the past 12 months. A previous traffic calming device application has not been denied within the past 12 months. 8. An engineering study that the traffic calming devices are warranted and feasible to implement in the affected area. Applicants have provided a study. The traffic calming study, certified by an individual licensed in North Carolina to perform such activities must include the following: 1. Roadway characteristics including alignment, grade, sight distance, intersection spacing, driveway location, edge treatments (curbing, shoulders, etc), signage, pavement markings, and on-street parking. Not included in traffic study materials. 2. Vehicle characteristics of existing traffic (based on a three-day vehicle classification study) Vehicle characteristics included for a two-day study. 3. Traffic speed and volume data (based on a three-day speed and volume study) Traffic speed and volume data included for a two-day study. 4. Three-year crash history Not included in traffic study materials. 5. Recommended devices including typical details. Recommended devices and typical details included in study materials. 6. A conceptual plan demonstrating the proposed location of traffic calming devices and associated advanced warning signage / pavement markings. Not included in traffic study materials. 7. A recommended implementation schedule and preliminary line-item cost estimates Not included in traffic study materials. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has the authority to reject an application based on engineering judgement, an absence of documented need and / or concerns with adverse impacts on emergency response, as well as bicycle and pedestrian safety. Woodlake Subdivision Traffic Calming Device Request – TRC Review Page | 3 Cape Fear Public Utility Authority – Bernice Johnson (910) 332-6620 1. If traffic calming circle is approved, CFPUA will need to review the location to ensure it does not impact the water and sewer utilities. NCDOT (910) 398-9100 2. No comments on the proposed site as it doesn’t connect to or directly impact any state roads. WMPO – Jamar Johnson (910) 473-5130 1. This section of Ontario Rd is 32’ wide from edge of pavement to edge of pavement with valley curb and gutter. Please be mindful of potential drainage issues when installing certain traffic calming devices. 2. It is not recommended practice to install speed tables on roads with posted speed limits of less than 25mph per NACTO. 3. FHWA does not recommend installing speed tables along road curves that have a horizontal curve radius of 300 feet. 4. The section of Ontario Rd that was studied has a posted speed limit of 20mph. The study showed that the 85th percentile speed overall is 27mph for this section of Ontario Rd. The conclusion of the study recommends speed tables. According to Appendix A, NACTO, and FHWA, speed tables are effective in maintaining speeds between 25mph and 30mph. The installation of speed tables may not effectively reduce speeds below 25mph. Sidbury RV Park Sketch Plan – TRC Review Page | 1 To: Doug Grant (catadjusterdoug@gmail.com) From: Julian Griffee Current Planner Date: April 19, 2023 Egov#: N/A PID: R02000-003-005-000 Subject: Sidbury RV Park Sketch Plan – TRC Review The following comments have been received for the April 19th, 2023 TRC meeting. Additional comments may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions. Please note: these comments are for a sketch plan review and may not reflect a full list of applicable comments. Planning, Julian Griffee 910-798-7444 1. Please note this TRC review is for a sketch plan review of an RV park. 2. RV parks are subject to a Special Use Permit, so please bear in mind that that would need to be acquired prior to building permits and TRC review. 3. RV Parks are subject to 4.3.4.E.2. – Campground/Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park standards. a. Subletter Q references Sewage disposal – please refer to Environmental Health regarding this section. b. Subletter S references Fire Hydrants – please refer to Fire Services regarding this section. 4. Easements: a. Please ensure all storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main utility easements are labeled and shown on the site plan, UDO Section 6.2.2. 5. Have met with the applicant a few times regarding this plan and have discussed buffering, access, open space, etc., regarding the site. 6. Please note other requirements may come into play – Lighting, signage, etc. Fire Services, David Stone 910-798-7052 1. Northern Regional Park - Old Ave. - Major Site Plan - Soccer Field additions I have visited the site recently. The following comments are as follows: Sidbury RV Park Sketch Plan – TRC Review Page | 2 2. This park is expanding, of which I use once in awhile. Street signs need to be added through out the park with street names being added in the older section as well. The public needs to know where to send emergency responders faster. 3. All building need, existing as well as new, large signage again to better identify therre location. ie: Shelter 1 , 2 etc. Looked at one when I was there and only a letter was found in the small info. box as to what shelter I was at. I suggest a 4 - 6 inch height letter on a background that can be seen from the road by emergecy responders (ie: black on white, red on white, etc.) 4. Will Madeline Trask Drive extend to the existing paved Roadway. I reccommend it does, even if it is graveled. You can install a gate with a KNOX Padlock. This would give emergency services another way in. It would also expedite services in / out of the park faster in this end of the park. NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072 1. A land disturbing and a stormwater permit issued by the County are required for this project. Please submit for permits as the design is completed. Please check with NC DEQ for the requirements of a state stormwater permit. 2. An downstream analysis may be required for the ditch downstream of the pond. Adequate conveyance to the DOT ROW doesn’t appear to be provided. A conceptual design for ditch improvement may be required. Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620 1. There is no CFPUA water and sewer available. USACE, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 1. The Corps approved an all-upland jurisdictional determination on this property several weeks ago. No comment. WMPO, Jamar Johnson 910-343-3915 1. No comments yet. Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732 1. No comments yet. Planning (Addressing), Kathrine May 910-798-7443 1. No comments yet. NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-398-9114 1. No comments yet. Sidbury RV Park Sketch Plan – TRC Review Page | 3 Comments not received at this time from: Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still NCDEQ, Chad Coburn New Hanover Soil & Water, Dru Harrison WMPO, Jamar Johnson NCDEMLR, Dan Sams DCM, Tanya Pietila New Hanover County Schools, Laura Severt