Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-07-06 PB AGENDA PACKET
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC 28401 Members of the Board Jeffrey P Petroff, Chair |Donna Girardot, Vice-Chair Paul Boney|Hansen Ma'hews |Jeffrey Stokley Jr. | H. Allen Pope |Colin J. Tarrant Rebekah Roth, Director| Ken Vafier, Planning Manager JULY 6, 2023 6:00 PM Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS The Planning Board may consider substanal changes in these peons as a result of objecons, debate, and discussion at the meeng, including rezoning to other classificaons. 1 Rezoning Request (Z23-12) – Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Patricia Roseman with Blue Tank, LLC and Holly Tank, LLC, property owners, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned I-1, Light I ndustrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned I-1 and R-15, ResidenBal located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMF-L, ResidenBal MulB-Family – Low Density for a maximum of 521 residenBal units consisBng of mulB-family, aEached, and detached residenBal dwelling units. This item was connued from the June 1 Planning Board meeng. 2 Rezoning Request (Z23-14) – Request by Wes Reynolds with SB CoEages Investment, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 7.37 acres of land located at 7641, 7645, and 7647 Carolina Beach Road from R-15, ResidenBal to (CZD) R-5 ResidenBal for a maximum of 56 aEached single family dwelling units. 3 Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design SoluBons, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, ResidenBal to (CZD) R-5, ResidenBal for a maximum of 7 single- family residenBal lots. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/6/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Robert Farrell, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Robert Farrell; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Rezoning Request (Z23-12) – Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Patricia Roseman with Blue Tank, LLC and Holly Tank, LLC, property owners, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned I-1, Light Industrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned I-1 and R-15, ResidenDal located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMF-L, ResidenDal MulD-Family – Low Density for a maximum of 521 residenDal units consisDng of mulD-family, aEached, and detached residenDal dwelling units. This item was connued from the June 1 Planning Board meeng. BRIEF SUMMARY: This item was con nued from the June 1 Planning Board mee ng to allow the applicant further considera on of the county's proposed condi on to include a declara on in future deeds and leases intended to mi gate poten al concerns related to addi onal residen al development along a primarily industrial corridor. The applicant reviewed the proposed condi on in communica on with Planning staff and the County A,orney's office however stated their preference to not include the condi on as part of the applica on request. The applicant has stated they are willing to discuss the content and merits of the proposed condi on but an agreement has not been reached prior to publishing the Planning Board packet. The proposed concept plan is for a maximum 521 dwelling units consis ng of mul -family, single-family a,ached and single-family detached units. It is currently an cipated that the proposal will be developed over four phases. The mul - family phase will be located at the corner of Holly Shelter and Blue Clay Road and total a maximum of 243 units, and three phases of mixed single-family a,ached and detached dwellings on the southern parcel totaling 278 units. Access for the mul -family component of the development is proposed from Blue Clay and Holly Shelter while the remaining single-family units would be accessed from Blue Clay Road. There is not vehicular connec vity between the mul -family and single-family developments; however, a condi on has been provided guaranteeing bicycle and pedestrian interconnec vity. Both the mul -family and single-family por ons of the project include stormwater, open space, and designated ameni es. The R-15 and I-1 zoning districts in this area were established in 1971. At the me, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private sep c and wells would be developed at low densi es. The I-1 zoning designa on for this property reflected the industrial uses already in existence at the me this area of the county was ini ally zoned. Por ons of both of the parcels were rezoned from the original R-15 and I-1 zoning to the current zoning in 2000 in rezoning case Z-708. With that approval, a 75’ foot wide strip of R-15 was leA to serve as a buffer between the I-1 district and the single-family residen al across the Blue Clay Road right-of-way. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 The purpose of the RMF-L district is to accommodate lands for moderate density single family and low-density mul - family development of varying types and designs. The intent is that the RMF-L district will provide op ons for alterna ve housing types near or in direct rela onship to single-family detached development with a range of housing op ons. The proposal has an overall density of 7.19 dwelling units per acre. The maximum allowed density in the RMF-L district is 10 units per acre. Performance residen al developments are subject to specific setback standards. Buildings within a performance residen al development require a minimum setback of 20 feet from an adjoining property line. The applicant has provided a condi on restric ng the maximum height of structures on the parcel to not exceed 45’ and no taller than 3 stories. Mul -family and nonresiden al structures of this height within an RMF district are subject to a 30-foot required setback when abuDng general residen al zoned lots. Transi onal buffers also serve as a mi ga on method to limit impacts on adjacent uses. Opaque buffers are required between more intense residen al uses when adjacent to parcels accommoda ng single-family detached and/or duplex dwelling units. For this type of development, set-aside dedicated open space must amount to at least 20 percent of the site. The site plans indicate that the dedicated open space exceeds this required amount. The site is accessed at the intersec on of Holly Shelter Road, an NCDOT major collector road, and Blue Clay Road, an NCDOT major collector road. Currently, the site is undeveloped. If developed at the typical build out, the property could support 545,000 square feet of General Industrial, the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area within the I-1 zoning district, and 7 single-family dwellings, the typical development allowed within the R-15 zoning district. It is es mated that a 545,000 square foot development of General Industrial and 7 single-family dwellings would generate approximately 408 AM peak hour trips and 361 PM peak hour trips. It is es mated that the proposed development of 521 total residen al units of which 243 are mul -family units, and 278 mixed single-family a,ached and detached dwelling units, would generate approximately 237 AM peak hour trips and 288 PM peak hour trips. This is a reduc on in the es mated generated trips by 171 AM peak hour trips and 73 PM peak hour trips. New developments that are an cipated to generate more than 100 trips during any peak hour period are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of their rezoning applica on. A team of NCDOT, WMPO, and County planning staff work with an applicant’s traffic engineers to develop the scope for the TIA, including the study area, the traffic data which must be collected, trip distribu on, and the developments and background traffic growth that must be analyzed. This document is used to iden fy off-site transporta on improvements required to mi gate the impacts of the development and must be approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. The proposed project is located along two NCDOT maintained roads, both of which are under capacity. The applicant has had a TIA approved by the NCDOT and WMPO requiring several roadway improvements, including signaliza on of a nearby intersec on, the addi on of new turning lanes, and the lengthening of tapers and storage lanes. The subject site is in close proximity to the I-40 – Holly Shelter Road interchange and the future Holly Shelter Business Park, which are expected to generate more commercial traffic once developed. The approved TIA can be viewed here. Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary School, Holly Shelter Middle School, and Laney High School. A maximum of 7 dwelling units would be permi,ed under the current R- 15 zoning density, and 521 units could poten ally be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 514 dwelling units. Based on a generalized historic genera on rate, staff would es mate that the increase in homes would result in an increase of approximately 113 more students than the number of students who are es mated to be already generated under the exis ng zoning. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 I-1 Light Industrial, I-2 Heavy Industrial, and R-15 Residen al zoning surround the immediate site, and B-2 zoning exists at the I-40 and Holly Shelter Road interchange. The subject site is located adjacent to exis ng industrial uses, with heavy industrial located across Blue Clay Road and Holly Shelter Road. Other heavy industrial uses exist to the east and u lize Holly Shelter Road as their access point. The proposal is located within one-mile of a County invested business development, the future Holly Shelter Business Park. This development is expected to generate an increase in industrial and commercial traffic along the Holly Shelter Road corridor. The development could serve as a transi on between the industrial zoning to the north and west from the single-family residen al parcels to the south and east. The subject site is located just east of the I-40 – Holly Shelter Road interchange, an area that is primarily zoned for commercial development. This proposal could provide for housing that could support future commercial and industrial development within the area. The General Residen al place type focuses on small-scale, lower density housing, associated civic and limited commercial services development that enhances neighborhood character. Types of appropriate uses include single- family residen al, low-density mul -family residen al, light commercial, civic, and recrea onal. The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing op ons recommended in the General Residen al place type. Furthermore, the housing types permi,ed by the proposed rezoning offer diverse housing op ons that could support commercial and industrial developments an cipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Intelligent Growth & Economic DevelopmentEncourage development of complete communi es in the unincorporated countyEnsure NHC has appropriate housing to support business growth RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff’s recommenda on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera ons, and technical review. The proposal promotes the uses recommended within the General Residen al place type, and supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goal to provide for a range of housing types and opportuni es for households of different sizes and income. The proposal could accommodate residen al developments that would support commercial and industrial developments that are an cipated within the area. While the Comprehensive Plan recommenda on for this site was established prior to plans for the Holly Shelter Business Park, the proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally consistent with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the density and range of housing op ons recommended within the General Residen al place type, and the housing types permi,ed by the proposed rezoning would provide diverse housing op ons that could support commercial and industrial developments an cipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. As a result, staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following mo on and an addi onal Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 condi on intended to mi gate poten al concerns related to addi onal residen al development along a primarily industrial corridor the applicant has reviewed but has not agreed to include as a condi on. I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing op ons recommended in the General Residen al place type. The project could also serve as a transi on between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low-density, single-family residen al uses. I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residen al uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following condi ons: Applicant Proposed CondiDons: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connec vity between the mul -family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45’ in height and a maximum of 3 stories. AddiDonal Recommended CondiDon: 1. A declara on statement shall be included in all future deeds and leases related to the subject proper es sta ng the property or lease is in proximity to exis ng and future commercial and industrial ac vi es that may result in noise, vibra on, commercial heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, lights, odors, and other factors associated with industrial development which may occur any me during the day or night. AlternaDve MoDon for Denial (If based on informa on presented at the public hearing or other considera on beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL the proposed rezoning to Condi onal RMF-L, district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residen al housing densi es outlined for the General Residen al place type, I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact exis ng and future non-residen al development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. ATTACHMENTS: Descrip on Planning Board Script Z23-12 Planning Board Staff Report Z23-12 Zoning Map Z23-12 Future Land Use Map Z23-12 Mailout Map Initial Application Cover Sheet Application Materials The Oasis Rezoning Plans TIA Approval Letter TIA Executive Summary Concept Plan Cover Sheet The Oasis Concept Plan Public Comment Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z23-12) Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Patricia Roseman with Blue Tank, LLC and Holly Tank, LLC, property owners, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned I-1, Light Industrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned I-1 and R-15, Residential located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMFL, Residential Multi-Family – Low Density for a maximum of 521 residential units consisting of multi-family, attached, and detached residential dwelling units. This item was continued from the June 1st regular meeting. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low- density, single-family residential uses. I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following conditions. Applicant Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi-family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45’ in height and a maximum of 3 stories. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1 Additional Recommended Condition: 1. A declaration statement shall be included in all future deeds and leases related to the subject properties stating the property or lease is in proximity to existing and future commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, commercial heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, lights, odors, and other factors associated with industrial development which may occur any time during the day or night. Example Motion for Denial I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 1 - 2 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 1 of 20 STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-12 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z23-12 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L, Residential Multi-family Low Density District Applicant: Property Owner(s): William Block, Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne LLC Blue Tank LLC and Holly Tank LLC Location: Acreage: 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road 72.39 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R01100-008-011-002 & R01100-008-010- 000 General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Vacant Land 521 residential units comprised of multi- family, single-family attached and detached units Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: I-1, Light Industrial District and R-15, Residential District (CZD) RMF-L, Conditional Residential Multi- Family Low Density District SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Heavy Industrial and undeveloped land I-2 East Heavy Industrial, Single-Family Residential I-2, R-15 South Single-Family Residential R-15 West FAA Navigational Tower I-1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 2 of 20 ZONING HISTORY July 7, 1972 Initially zoned I-1 and R-15 (Area 8A) August 7, 2000 Portions of both parcels rezoned from R-15 to I-1 in Z-708 COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water is available through CFPUA. CFPUA would require an on-site sewer pump station with a force main. CFPUA and New Hanover County are partnering on a proposed force main extension capital project along Holly Shelter Road from I-40 eastward to the future Holly Shelter business park. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Castle Hayne Station Schools Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools Recreation Northern Regional Park, Riverside Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 3 of 20 APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Includes Staff Markups • The proposed concept plan is for a maximum 521 dwelling units consisting of multi-family, single-family attached and single-family detached units. It is currently anticipated that the proposal will be developed over four phases. The multi-family phase will be located at the corner of Holly Shelter and Blue Clay Road and total a maximum of 243 units, and three phases of mixed single-family attached and detached dwellings on the southern parcel totaling 278 units. • Access for the multi-family component of the development is proposed from Blue Clay and Holly Shelter while the remaining single-family units would be accessed from Blue Clay Road. There is not vehicular connectivity between the multi-family and single-family developments however a condition has been provided guaranteeing bicycle and pedestrian interconnectivity. • Both the multi-family and single-family portions of the project include stormwater, open space, and designated amenities. Ho l l y S h e l t e r R o a d Ac c e s s P o i n t St o r m w a t e r P o n d s Blue Clay Road Access Points Multi-Family Phase 1 Amenity Spaces Single-Family Attached and Detached Dwellings Phases 2, 3 & 4 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 4 of 20 • This item was continued from the June 1 Planning Board meeting to allow the applicant further consideration of the county’s proposed condition related to nearby existing and future industrial development. • The applicant reviewed the proposed condition in communication with Planning staff and the County Attorney’s office. The applicant has stated their preference to not include the condition as part of the application request. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 and I-1 zoning districts in this area were established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. The I-1 zoning designation for this property reflected the industrial uses already in existence at the time this area of the county was initially zoned. • Portions of both of the parcels were rezoned from the original R-15 and I-1 zoning to the current zoning in 2000 in rezoning case Z-708. With that approval, a 75’ foot wide strip of R-15 was left to serve as a buffer between the I-1 district and the single-family residential across the Blue Clay Road right-of-way. • There has been a trend of parcels transitioning to denser residential districts in this portion of the county, including parcels rezoned to R-5, Moderate-High Density and RMF-L districts along Blue Clay Road, Dairy Farm Road, and Sidbury Road to the south. • The purpose of the RMF-L district is to accommodate lands for moderate density single family and low-density multi-family development of varying types and designs. The intent is that the RMF-L district will provide options for alternative housing types near or in direct relationship to single-family detached development with a range of housing options. • The proposal has an overall density of 7.19 dwelling units per acre. The maximum allowed density in the RMF-L district is 10 units per acre. • Performance residential developments are subject to specific setback standards. Buildings within a Performance Residential Development require a minimum setback of 20 feet from an adjoining property line. • The applicant has provided a condition restricting the maximum height of structures on the parcel to not exceed 45’ and no taller than 3 stories. Multi-family and nonresidential structures of this height within an RMF district are subject to a 30-foot required setback when abutting general residential zoned lots. • Transitional buffers also serve as a mitigation method to limit impacts on adjacent uses. Opaque buffers are required between more intense residential uses when adjacent to parcels accommodating single-family detached and/or duplex dwelling units. • For this type of development, set-aside dedicated open space must amount to at least 20 percent of the site. The site plans indicate that the dedicated open space exceeds this required amount. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 5 of 20 AREA DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Oasis RMF-L Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 6 of 20 TRANSPORTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS Possible Intensity of Current Zoning 69.46 acres of I-1 Zoning (ITE Code 110) 545,000 sq ft the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area 2.94 acres of R-15 Zoning (ITE Code 210) 7 Single-family Dwellings PROPOSED ACCESS Multi-family Phase Single-family Phase Primary Access Holly Shelter Road Blue Clay Road Secondary Access Blue Clay Road - Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 7 of 20 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway(s) Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road Type of Roadway(s) Holly Shelter Road – Major collector road Blue Clay Road – Major collector road Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) Holly Shelter Road – 13,895 Blue Clay Road – 13,895 Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) Holly Shelter Road – 6,800 (2021) Blue Clay Road – 2,100 (2021) Latest WMPO Point-in-Time County (DT) Not available near subject parcel Current Level of Congestion Under Capacity Sources Source of Planning Capacity: WMPO Source of Latest Traffic Volumes: NCDOT (2021) TRAFFIC GENERATION Potential Traffic Generation at Current Potential Build Out Traffic Generated by Proposed Designation Potential Impact of Proposed Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 408 237 -171 PM Peak Hour Trips 361 288 -73 Assumptions Potential Current Zoning Build Out – 545,000 square feet of General Industrial, the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area within the I-1 zoning district, and 7 single- family dwellings, the typical development allowed within the R- 15 zoning district. Proposed Development – 521 total residential units of which 243 are multi-family units, and 278 mixed single-family attached and detached dwelling units. Sources WMPO & approved TIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) New developments that are anticipated to generate more than 100 trips during any peak hour period are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of their rezoning application. A team of NCDOT, WMPO, and County planning staff work with an applicant’s traffic engineers to develop the scope for the TIA, including the study area, the traffic data which must be collected, trip distribution, and the developments and background traffic growth that must be analyzed. This document is used to identify off-site transportation improvements required to mitigate the impacts of the development and must be approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 8 of 20 Approval Date April 12, 2023 Development Proposal Analyzed 57 single family detached dwellings, 231 single-family attached dwellings, and 240 multi-family housing (Mid-rise) units. Study Intersections - Holly Shelter Road at I-40 EB Ramps - Holly Shelter Road at I-40 WB Ramps - Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road - Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road - Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 Trip Generation - 253 AM peak hour trips - 288 PM peak hour trips - 3,410 average daily trips Traffic Data Collection October 25, 2022 - I-40 Michael Jordan Fwy On/Off-Ramp and Holly Shelter Road - Blue Clay Road at Holly Shelter Road - Dairy Farm Road and Sidbury Road Trip Distribution and Assignment - 5% to/from the North via I-40 - 30% to/from the South via I-40 - 10% to/from the East via Holly Shelter Road - 10% to/from the East via Sidbury Road - 20% to/from the West via Holly Shelter Road - 25% to/from the West via Sidbury Road Approved Developments & Background Growth - Growth Rate – 2% per year Required Improvements - Signalize the intersection at I-40 Eastbound Ramp at SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) - At I-40 Westbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road), either signalize the intersection and provide necessary coordination (recommended) or construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on I-40 westbound ramps, with 400 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration, and taper. - At the intersection of SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road), construct an eastbound right turn lane on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper and construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on SR Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 9 of 20 2181 (Blue Clay Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. - At SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and Site Access #1, construct an eastbound right turn eastbound right turn taper of 200 feet on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road), construct site access (northbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for northbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #2, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #3, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #4, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 75 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SUMMARY The proposed project is located along two NCDOT maintained roads, both of which are under capacity. The applicant has had a TIA approved by the NCDOT and WMPO requiring several roadway improvements, including signalization of a nearby intersection, the addition of new turning lanes, and the lengthening of tapers and storage lanes. The subject site is in close proximity to the I-40 – Holly Shelter Road interchange and the future Holly Shelter Business Park, which are expected to generate more commercial traffic once developed. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 10 of 20 ENVIRONMENTAL • The parcel is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area. • The entire site is within the Holly Shelter Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitations), Class III (severe limitations), and Class IV (unsuitable) soils. • CFPUA and New Hanover County are partnering on a proposed force main extension capital project along Holly Shelter Road from I-40 eastward to the future Holly Shelter business park. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools • Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary School, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High School. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools. • A maximum of 7 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning density, and 521 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 514 dwelling units. • Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in an increase of approximately 113 more students than the number of students who are estimated to be already generated under the existing zoning. • The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students. Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 11 of 20 Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high Typical Development under Current Zoning 7 residential units Total: 2 (1 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Potential Development under Proposed Zoning District 521 residential units Total: 115 (47 elementary, 26 middle, 36 high) *The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out- of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech. **Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the approximate total. • Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades. School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year) *Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year. **Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time. • The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data, planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded. Level Total NHC Capacity School Projected Enrollment of Assignment School Capacity of Assigned School w/Portables Capacity of Assigned School Funded or Planned Capacity Upgrades Elementary 91% Castle Hayne 422 523 81% None Middle 92% Holly Shelter 851 991 86% None High 99% Laney 2214 1941 114% None Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 11 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 12 of 20 NEW HANOVER COUNTY STRATEGIC PLAN • One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services. • The proposed RMF-L conditional zoning district (CZD) would allow for an increase in housing diversity. • The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 76%. Under the proposed RMF-L district the site would allow for multi-family attached (apartments), and single family attached (townhomes) and increase housing type diversity by reducing the percentage of single family detached (76% to 60%) and increasing the percentage of multi-family units (0% to 10%) and single family attached units (9% to 18%). • The subject property is located in the Castle Hayne community area, where 29% of residents currently live within one-mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples, pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor’s office, child & adult care, etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.). Under the proposed RMF- L district and because the number of proposed units would be beyond one-mile of current basic goods and services, the number of residences within one-mile of goods and services would decrease to 26%. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 12 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 13 of 20 Existing Conditions Holly Shelter Road looking east Holly Shelter Road looking west Subject site from Blue Clay Road Concrete plant across Blue Clay Road Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 13 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 14 of 20 Representative Developments Representative Developments of I-1 (Existing Zoning/Land Use): Light Industrial within Dutch Square Light Industrial within the N Kerr Business Park Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 14 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 15 of 20 Representative Developments Representative Development of R-15 (Existing Zoning/Land Use): Clay Crossing Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 15 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 16 of 20 Representative Developments Representative Developments of Single-family Attached & Multi-family Developments (Proposed Land Use): Woodlands of Echo Farms (City of Wilmington) Stephen’s Pointe Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 16 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 17 of 20 Context and Compatibility • The subject property is located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road. Both roadways are NCDOT maintained major collector roads. • I-1 Light Industrial, I-2 Heavy Industrial, and R-15 Residential zoning surround the immediate site, and B-2 zoning exists at the I-40 and Holly Shelter Road interchange. • The subject site is located adjacent to existing industrial uses, with heavy industrial located across Blue Clay Road and Holly Shelter Road. Other heavy industrial uses exist to the east and utilize Holly Shelter Road as their access point. • The proposal is located within one mile of a County invested business development, the future Holly Shelter Business Park. This development is expected to generate an increase in industrial and commercial traffic along the Holly Shelter Road corridor. • The development could serve as a transition between the industrial zoning to the north and west from the single-family residential parcels to the south and east. • The subject site is located just east of the I-40 – Holly Shelter Road interchange, an area that is primarily zoned for commercial development. This proposal could provide for housing that could support future commercial and industrial development within the area. • The applicant has designated buffering between the proposal and the existing single-family dwellings to the east and south. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 17 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 18 of 20 Future Land Use Map Place Type General Residential Place Type Description Focuses on small-scale, lower density housing, associated civic and limited commercial services development that enhances neighborhood character. Types of appropriate uses include single-family residential, low-density multi-family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational projects. Analysis The subject property is in the northern portion of the county, located along Holly Shelter Road between the I-40 access ramps and Blue Clay Road. Zoning along and directly off of this corridor includes a mix of residential uses, commercial zoning, and industrial zoning. Residential development patterns within the general area have progressively changed with more moderate densities. The General Residential place type provides opportunities for low to moderate density housing. While the proposed RMF-L district allows for a maximum of 10 dwelling units/acre, which is higher than the density range recommended for the General Residential place type (approximately 8 units/acre), the proposed development has a density of 7.19 dwellings units/acre. This density is generally consistent with the density range of the place type. The General Residential place type provides for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. Development within this place type accommodates residential developments that can support commercial and industrial developments that are associated and promoted within other place types, such as the Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. Along with the preferred density range, the proposal promotes the uses recommended within the General Residential place type and supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goal to provide for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. The subject site is located between areas designated as Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. The proposed rezoning would accommodate residential developments that could support commercial and industrial developments that are anticipated within these place types and is in line with the existing residential development on nearby parcels. Consistency Recommendation The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. Furthermore, the housing types permitted by the proposed rezoning offer diverse housing options that could support commercial and industrial developments anticipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 18 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 19 of 20 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. The proposal promotes the uses recommended within the General Residential place type and supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goal to provide for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. The proposal could accommodate residential developments that would support commercial and industrial developments that are anticipated within the area. While the Comprehensive Plan recommendation for this site was established prior to plans for the Holly Shelter Business Park, the proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the density and range of housing options recommended within the General Residential place type, and the housing types permitted by the proposed rezoning would provide diverse housing options that could support commercial and industrial developments anticipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. As a result, staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion with an additional condition intended to mitigate potential concerns related to additional residential development along a primarily industrial corridor. The applicant has reviewed but has not agreed to the condition prior to finalizing this staff report. I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low-density, single-family residential uses. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following conditions: Applicant Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi- family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45’ in height and a maximum of 3 stories. Additional Recommended Condition: 1. A declaration statement shall be included in all future deeds and leases related to the subject properties stating the property or lease is in proximity to existing and future commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, commercial heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, lights, odors, and other factors associated with industrial development which may occur any time during the day or night. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 19 Z23-12 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 20 of 20 Alternative Motion for Denial (If based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 20 M c g r e g o r R d M c g r e g o r R d Holly Sh e l t e r R d Holly She l t e r R d Woodhaven D r Woodhaven D r Blu e C l a y R d Blu e C l a y R d Glazier RdGlazier Rd B a r b a d o s B l v d B a r b a d o s B l v d I - 4 0 I - 4 0 I - 4 0 I - 4 0 NixonLn NixonLn Brookdale DrBrookdale Dr L ulaNixon R d L ulaNixon R d New Hanover County, NC RMF-LR-15 & I-15210 Holly Shelter Rd & 5735 Blue Clay Road Z23-12 Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case: ZONING B-2 I-1 I-2 R-10 R-15 Z23-12 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1 M c g r e g o r R d M c g r e g o r R d Holly Sh e l t e r R d Holly She l t e r R d Woodhaven D r Woodhaven D r Blu e C l a y R d Blu e C l a y R d Glazier RdGlazier Rd B a r b a d o sBlvd B a r b a d o sBlvdI - 4 0 I - 4 0 NixonLn NixonLn Brookdale DrBrookdale Dr L ula Nixon Rd L ula Nixon Rd New Hanover County, NC RMF-LR-15 & I-15210 Holly Shelter Rd & 5735 Blue Clay Road Z23-12 Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case: Future Land Use COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY MIXED USE CONSERVATION Z23-12 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1 XING HOLLY SHELTE R HOLLY SH E L T E R C O L L E G E I - 4 0 I - 4 0 CA S T L E H A Y N E SIDBURY New Hanover County, NC RMF-LR-15 & I-15210 Holly Shelter Rd & 5735 Blue Clay Road Z23-12 Proposed Zoning/Use:Existing Zoning/Use:Site Address:Case: Z23-12 Parcels within 500 feet Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1 Initial Application Documents & Materials Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay RdCastle Hayne, NC 28429 ± 23.03 ac± 49.41 ac R01100-008-011-002R01100-008-010-000 I-2 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential RMF-L ± 72.44 ac See Attached See Attached DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641AD0A 23.01 ac49.38 ac I-1 72.39 ac Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay RdCastle Hayne, NC 28429 ± 23.03 ac± 49.41 ac R01100-008-011-002R01100-008-010-000 I-2 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential RMF-L ± 72.44 ac See Attached See Attached DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641AD0A 23.01 ac49.38 ac I-1 72.39 ac Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 8 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 9 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 10 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 11 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 12 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 13 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay RdCastle Hayne, NC 28429 ± 23.03 ac± 49.41 ac R01100-008-011-002R01100-008-010-000 I-2 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential RMF-L ± 72.44 ac See Attached See Attached DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641AD0A 23.01 ac49.38 ac I-1 72.39 ac Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 14 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 15 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 16 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 17 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 18 DocuSign Envelope ID: E76E5BF8-47F9-47A3-BAC4-68DBFB566D2B 4/26/2023 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 19 DocuSign Envelope ID: E76E5BF8-47F9-47A3-BAC4-68DBFB566D2B 4/26/2023 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 20 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E , W I L M I N G T O N , N C 2 8 4 0 3 P H : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Supplemental Application Information Proposed Conditional Rezoning by Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC New Hanover County Parcels R01100-008-011-002 & R01100-008-010-000 (Approx. 72.4 acres located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road) 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative. The proposed conditional zoning would allow the subject parcel to be developed with a mixture of townhomes and multi-family units consisting of a maximum of 521 units. The existing zoning is split between I-1 Industrial and small portion R-15 residential along Blue Clay Road. 243 multi-family units are proposed near to the corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road with a primary site access located on Holly Shelter away from the intersection of Blue Clay Road. A proposed secondary apartment access is located at Blue Clay Road across from the S&W Ready Mix site. while the townhomes are located further south on Blue Clay Road closer to existing housing. The conditional rezoning plan depicts townhomes with four or more attached units, and current market conditions indicate this is how the project will remain. However, the applicant requests the ability to mix the residential types outside of the apartments. RMF-L allows multiple residential product types including single family, duplex, triplex and quadraplex as well as townhomes/rowhouses. We request the ability to provide a mixture of units for the 278 units proposed outside of the apartment area in accordance with the residential types allowed in RMF-L. The applicant understands that any change in unit mix will require review by New Hanover County Planning staff to assure compliance with the rezoning plan and by NCDOT/WMPO to assure the proposed project is still compliant with the Traffic Impact Analysis as approved or revised as needed. Major changes to the plan will require a new submittal to New Hanover County Planning The site is currently zoned for industrial use and a small portion along Blue Clay Road is zoned R15 for residential use. The proposed mixed residential zoning would be more compatible with existing homes on Blue Clay Road and would also be aligned with the General Residential place type applied to this area by the Comprehensive Plan. The Holly Shelter corridor near the site currently has a mixture of uses including industrial and more intensive uses before stepping down to the less intense business and residential uses along Blue Clay Road. Keeping with the existing development pattern, we propose clustering the apartments along Holly Shelter thereby creating a transition from the more intense zoning use along Holly Shelter to the less intense residential portion of our project along Blue Clay Road. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 21 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E , W I L M I N G T O N , N C 2 8 4 0 3 P H : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 A TIA was completed for the proposed development and approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. The notable required roadway improvements include signalizing Holly Shelter Road at the I-40 interchange and installing new turn lanes at the Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road intersection. 4. Proposed Condition(s) The development will be built in accordance with the conditional rezoning plan, the UDO, and any approved modifications to the plan. 5. Traffic Impact *See provided Traffic Impact Analysis 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. The proposal will help provide and increase the range of housing options in northern New Hanover County, consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is also accessed by major collector roadways and is in close proximity to Castle Hayne, I-40, and educational facilities (Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and CFCC). The proposed density is consistent with the recommendations of the General Residential place type. Lastly, the design of the development would concentrate the density in multi-family structures adjacent Holly Shelter Road closer to areas classified as Community Mixed Use on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed townhomes are closer to the existing residential homes on Blue Clay Road. 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. The subject site is classified as General Residential on the Future Land Use Map. This classification promotes lower density residential (less than 8 du/ac) and associated civic and commercial services. The proposed conditional RMF-L (Residential Multi-Family Low Density) district would be limited to a maximum of 521 units (7.2 du/ac) and thus consistent with the density recommendation of the General Residential place type. The proposed multi-family structures are located along Holly Shelter Road, closer to areas classified as Community Mixed Use. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? With the adoption of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, the subject site was classified as General Residential which promotes residential development not to exceed 8 du/ac. In addition, New Hanover County has approved plans to extend utility services down Holly Shelter Road in order to support future development of the corridor. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 22 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E , W I L M I N G T O N , N C 2 8 4 0 3 P H : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 Community Meeting Report Proposed Conditional Rezoning by Stout Operating Firm, LLC New Hanover County Parcels R01100-008-011-002 & R01100-008-010-000 (Approx. 72.4 acres located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road) Notice of the meeting was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels as listed on the New Hanover County tax records. The meeting was held on Thursday, March 9th from 6:00-7:00pm at Spiffy On-Demand Car Care, 5656 Barbados Blvd. #160, Castle Hayne, NC 28429. The following items are attached: 1. A list of the adjacent property owners to whom written notice was mailed; and 2. A copy of the written notice. On behalf of the applicant, representatives from Stout Operating Firm, LLC (Now Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC) and Paramounte Engineering, Inc. were in attendance. No one from the public attended the meeting, therefore no questions or concerns regarding the proposal were discussed. During a site visit by Paramounte Engineering, we were approached by a neighbor asking about the development. This gentleman lives in the adjacent neighborhood along Blue Clay Road, but outside of the 500’ notification distance. After discussing the project with him, he stated he had no issue with the development and was happy water and sewer were getting extended closer to his home. He hopes to tie into CFPUA water when available. He understands this project will not bring services to his home, but we did discuss his options option for extension if Blue Clay Road is the location of water line extension or his other option of contacting CFPUA for the County’s infrastructure extension along Holly Shelter Road. No changes were made to the proposal as the result of this meeting or the site meeting with the neighbor. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 23 122 CINEMA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28403 PH: (910) 791-6707 February 22, 2023 RE: Community Meeting for a Conditional Rezoning Proposed on the Corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Stout Operating Firm, LLC invite you to a community meeting regarding a proposed conditional rezoning for + 72.41 acre residential development located on the corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road. The subject property is further identified as New Hanover County Parcels R01100-008-011-002 and R01100-008-010-000. As part of this rezoning process and prior to submitting our plans to New Hanover County Planning, we are reaching out to neighbors to inform them about our project. You are receiving this invitation because New Hanover County GIS records indicate you own property within 500 feet of the subject property. Please reference the enclosed site plan for a first look at our project, and you are welcome to attend our meeting to review larger plans. Our open-house style meeting will be held Thursday, March 9, 2023, at a nearby business, Spiffy On-Demand Car Care. Drop in any time between 6:30-7:30 PM. We will have full-size plans and members of the project team available to discuss our plans and answer your questions. If anyone is unavailable to attend the meeting at the designated day and time but wants to discuss the project, please contact our office at the phone number listed in the footer below. A few key facts about the site and proposed project: The subject property is undeveloped land located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road. The site is across Blue Clay Road from S&W Ready Mix Concrete and across Holly Shelter Road from Adams Products Oldcastle. The subject property’s Blue Clay Road frontage runs + 330’ south of Berwick Drive. The land proposed for conditional rezoning is currently zoned Residential 15 (R-15) for the road frontage along Blue Clay Road and Light Industrial (I-1) for the majority of the + 72 acre site. We are requesting a conditional rezoning to downzone the property from Industrial to Residential Multi-Family Low Density (RMF-L) to allow a range of residential product types including apartments near the Holly Shelter intersection and single family homes, duplexes, and townhomes for the remainder of the site. We look forward to meeting you on March 9th and to sharing project details with you. Community Meeting Time, Date, and Location: Open House from 6:30 – 7:30 PM on Thursday, March 9th Spiffy On-Demand Car Care 5656 Barbados Blvd. # 160, Castle Hayne, NC 28429 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 24 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 25 Blue Clay Tract Adjacent Property Owners OWNER NAME OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE CARTER CAROL 110 BERWICK DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 JENKINS RUTH M 303 E MCCLURE CIR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 POPE META MARIE 110 BLACKWATER DR WATHA NC 28478 DEAL MARK A 5800 BLUDE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MURRELL CANDACE 10 DONAMAR LN SOUTH AMBOY NJ 8879 MEARES DEWEY EUGENE ETAL PO BOX 377 ROCKY POINT NC 28457 ANDERSON JONATHON A 5812 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MILLER DUSTIN A 5808 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 STEWART RANDY C 5804 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BAILON PABLO JANETTE HERNANDEZ 6509 GREENVILLE LOOP RD LT 176 WILMINGTON NC 28409 SCHUTT GEORGE PO BOX 12013 WILMINGTON NC 28405 SIDBURY LAND & TIMBER LLC PO BOX 3649 WILMINGTON NC 28406 S & W READY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC 5700 LAKE WRIGHT DR SUITE 300 NORFOLK VA 23502 MILLIS DONALD GLENDON 5612 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMIREZ FLORES EULOGIO ET UX 567 WINDING CREEK RD ROCKY POINT NC 28457 ELEMENTIS CHROMIUM ACQUISITION 5408 HOLLY SHELTER RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RUIZ LUZ 5604 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RUIZ LUZ 5604 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RANSOM DANIEL W LAURA L 208 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CAMPBELL JOSHUA 104 BERWICK DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VANN LORRIE 6101 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VANN LORRIE 6101 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MABRY OFTENE ETAL 219 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HAND PAULA RENEE ETAL 104 PINE HOLLOW DR ROCKY POINT NC 28457 BMC ENTERPRISES PO BOX 312 HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 BETTENCOURT LISA K 189 BELL HAMMOND FORREST DR ROCKY POINT NC 28457 BMC ENTERPRISES PO BOX 312 HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 THOMPSON RUBY W 3836JAMES B WHITE HWY WHITEVILLE NC 28472 MURRELL CANDACE 10 DONMAR LN SOUTH AMBOY NJ 8879 GRIZZLE GEORGE D 5728 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 ROBBINS SIGLEY CARRIE S PO BOX 267 CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMSEY ORAL D JOANNE 9 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BRITT LLOYD R 203 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 STRICKLAND CHARLES II ANGELA 7 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 26 TODD THOMAS L JR 5524 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 USA PO BOX 20636 ATLANTA GA 30320 SHEPARD MICHAEL R 5533 BLE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HADGRAFT ROGER S LISA M 3301 AMMONS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 LEBLANC MICHELE 5509 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CAMERON COMPANY TIMBER LLC PO BOX 3649 WILMINGTON NC 28406 BERMAN JOHN J ETAL 3717 SAINT JOHNS CT UNIT B WILMINGTON NC 28403 OLDCASTLE APG SOUTH INC 333 N GREENE STREET SUITE 500 GREENSBORO NC 27401 TWO TEN INVESTORS INC PO BOC 1108 CLINTON NC 28329 MAZARIEGOS-PEREZ ENWELVER ET UX 6509 GREENVILLE LOOP RD LT 176 WILMINGTON NC 28409 JIMENEZ HERNANDEZ HUGO A ET UX 5704 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 AXTELL MICHAEL C MARY L 1536 COUNTRY CLUB DR HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES PO BOX 8040 FORT WAYNE IN 46898 NORTHERN FRANCIS E VERA E 7501 ELKMONT CT WILMINGTON NC 28411 GANON JOHN D JANET G 107 HIGH TIDE DR WILMINGTON NC 28411 BOYD DONNA 8 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 DIXON EBBO B HEIRS 1855 LOGANBERRY RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 MORALES WALTER X JEESEKA 2474 OLD OCEAN HWY BOLIVIA NC 28422 DIAZ HUGO C ETAL 7418 POWDER KEG CT WILMINGTON NC 28411 BOYD DONNA D ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMOS NORMA S 2755 NEW RD BURGAW NC 28425 MORALES WALTER X JEESEKA 2474 OLD OCEAN HWY BOLIVIA NC 28422 FRANCO WIMPER A MARIA I 222 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 LLANEZA ROBERT R MARIE W 5811 FALLEN TREE WILMINGTON NC 28405 GRIZZLE GEORGE 5724 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CROUSE NORMA JEAN 5716 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BOYD DONNA D ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BERMAN PHILIP B ETAL 3717 SAINT JOHNS CT UNIT B WILMINGTON NC 28403 USA PO BOX 20636 ATLANTA GA 30320 RAY DANIEL HRS 6 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HAYES RICHARD M JESSICA M 3 KERRY DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BOYD HERCHEL L DONNA S 8 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CARABALLO BRUNILDA 5 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 27 COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS MAY 2023 APPLICANT: THE OASIS OLYMPUS HOLDING COMPANY CASTLE HAYNE, LLC 4 PERCY STREET CHARLESTON, SC 29403 CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLAN NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD PROPERTY OWNER: BLUE TANK, LLC HOLLY TANK, LLC 24 BACKFIN POINT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 NOTICE REQUIRED ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES. CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED EXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM APPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R CONTACT THESE UTILITIES NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PH: 910-798-7165 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ATTN: CARL PAQUET PH: 910-350-2242 EMERGENCY DIAL 911 POLICE - FIRE - RESCUE CFPUA (WATER & SEWER) PH: 910-332-6550 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS GENERAL PH: 1-800-452-2777 AT&T ATTN: STEVE DAYVAULT PH: 910-341-7664 SPECTRUM GENERAL PH: 800-892-4357 PREPARED BY: PROJECT # 22208.PE PR E L I M I N A R Y D E S I G N - N O T R E L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 122 Cinema Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 (910) 791-6707 (O) (910) 791-6760 (F) NC License #: C-2846 THE OASIS SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE PROJECT CONSULTANTS SHEET INDEX MAY 1, 2023 SURVEYOR PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC. 122 CINEMA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28403 JOSH TAYLOR, PLS (910-791-6707) ENGINEER/ LAND PLANNER/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC. 122 CINEMA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28403 CIVIL: ROB BALLAND, PE (910-791-6707) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ALLISON ENGEBRETSON, RLA (910-791-6707) CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLAN APPLICANT: CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLANCRZ-1 OLYMPUS HOLDING COMPANY CASTLE HAYNE, LLC 4 PERCY STREET CHARLESTON, SC 29403 EX-1 C-0.0 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH 40 SITE T I M B E R D R E HO L L Y S H E L T E R R D B L U E C L A Y R D SI D B U R Y R D CAST L E H A Y N E R D N CO L L E G E R D DAIR Y FAR M R D Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1 HO L L Y S H E L T E R R O A D - S . R . 1 0 0 2 10 0 ' P U B L I C R / W N 7 7 ° 3 4 ' 4 3 " E 1 5 3 8 . 6 3 ' S 12°17'13" E 656.10'S 12°19'51" E 1255.63' S 8 4 ° 0 2 ' 3 9 " W 1 5 8 4 . 3 5 ' N 52 ° 2 5 ' 5 5 " W 9 4 9 . 7 2 ' N 7 7 ° 1 7 ' 1 1 " E 1 0 7 8 . 5 4 ' L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L 6 L7 L 8 L 9 L 1 0 L1 1 L12 L13 L14 L15 L1 6 BLUE CLAY ROAD - S.R. 1318 60' PUBLIC R/W PT H E R N T R A C T PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L CA M E R O N C O M P A N Y T I M B E R L L C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 5 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D OL D C A S T L E A P G S O U T H I N C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 2 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : C O N S T R U C T I O N S E R V I C E AN D E R S O N J O N A T H O N A PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MI L L E R D U S T I N A PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L ST E W A R T R A N D Y C PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DEAL MARK A PID: R01116-001-004-000 ZONING: R-15 LAND USE: RESIDENTIALAX T E L L M I C H A E L C M A R Y L PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 7 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JI M E N E Z H E R N A N D E Z H U G O A E T U X PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MA Z A R I E G O S - P E R E Z E N W E L V E R E T U X PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MIL L I S D O N A L D G L E N D O N PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JEN K I N S R U T H M PID : R 0 1 2 1 7 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L AM C S A Z T E C P R O P E R T I E S L L C PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D CR O U S E N O R M A J E A N PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 5 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DI X O N E B B O B H E I R S PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E D PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L PO P E M E T A M A R I E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L S & W READY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC PID: R01200-002-002-001 ZONING: I-2 LAND USE: CHEMICAL PLANT THE UNI T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A PARID: R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 0 - 0 0 1 D.B. 13 5 0 , P G . 1 5 8 THE U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A FED E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N PAR I D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 3 D.B. 1 2 8 4 , P G . 1 5 3 3 D.B. 2 4 8 2 , P G . 7 6 1 BE R W I C K D R I V E 60 ' P U B L I C R / W HO L L Y S H E L T E R R O A D - S . R . 1 0 0 2 10 0 ' P U B L I C R / W WET WE T WET W E T WE T WE T WET WET WE T WE T WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WE T W E T W E T WE T WE T WE T WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET W E T WE T WET WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T W E T W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WETWET WET WE T W E T W E T W E T WE T WE T WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T WE T WE T W E T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WE T WET W E T WET WET W E T HOLLY TANK LLC PARID: R01100-008-011-002 D.B. 6225, PG. 1482 1,002,179 S.F. ± 23.01 AC. ± BLUE TANK LLC PARID: R01100-008-010-000 D.B. 6225, PG. 1478 2,151,009 S.F. ± 49.38 AC. ± EXISTING WETLANDS ± 0.12 AC 28 28 2 8 2 8 24 26 30 30 3 0 28 30 2 8 28 28 2 4 24 26 22 2 2 28 2426 2 8 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 2626 28 28 28 28 26 26 28 2 6 28 28 26 26 3 0 28 2 6 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 EXISTING WETLANDS ± 2.79 AC >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> EXISTING VEGETATION: 4" - 7" SWEETGUM, WATER OAKS, & LOBLOLLY PINE; SPORADIC 2"-6" RED MAPLE & WATER OAKS W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" -3" PINES & OAKS EXISTING VEGETATION: 4" - 7" SWEETGUM & LOBLOLLY PINE; SPORADIC 2"-8" WATER OAKS OCCASIONAL 10-12" LOBLOLLY PINE W/ UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA EXISTING VEGETATION: 8" - 12" LOBLOLLY PINE; SPORADIC 3" -8" SWEETGUM & RED MAPLE CLUSTERS OCCASIONAL 10-12" LOBLOLLY PINE W/ UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA EXISTING VEGETATION: 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM & SOUTHERN MAGNOLIAS OCCASIONAL LARGE 20"-23" LOBLOLLY PINE ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD ROW W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA EXISTING VEGETATION: 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; SPORADIC 2" -12" WATER OAKS, SWEETGUMS & SOUTHERN MAGNOLIAS OCCASIONAL LARGE 20"-23" LOBLOLLY PINE ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD ROW W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" -3" SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA EXISTING VEGETATION: WAX MYRTLE AND INKBERRY THICKET WITH MIX OF 1" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; EXISTING VEGETATION: THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE , WATER OAK, SWEETBAY MAGNOLIA & MIX OF MIX OF 1" - 4" RED MAPLES WITH SPORADIC 8" -16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE EXISTING VEGETATION: WAX MYRTLE AND INKBERRY UNDERSTORY, PRIMARILY OPEN ABOVE 6' HT. WITH SPORADIC 10" -14" LOBLOLLY PINES; DI T C H DITCH ROADSIDE DITCH ROADSIDE DITCH BLUE CLAY ROAD - S.R. 1318 60' PUBLIC R/W CU L V E R T DI T C H DI T C H DITCH EXISTING VEGETATION: 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM & SOUTHERN MAGNOLIAS W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA EXISTING VEGETATION: 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM, SOUTHERN MAGNOLIAS & RED MAPLES W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA TH E O A S I S NE W H A N O V E R C O U N T Y NO R T H C A R O L I N A 22208.PE OL Y M P U S H O L D I N G C O M P A N Y C A S T L E H A Y N E , L L C 4 P E R C Y S T R E E T CH A R L E S T O N , S C 2 9 4 0 3 DA T E : SC A L E : DE S I G N E D : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : PEI JOB#: CO N C E P T U A L L A Y O U T : PR E L I M I N A R Y L A Y O U T : FI N A L D E S I G N : RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T : PR O J E C T S T A T U S RE V I S I O N S : DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N SEAL CL I E N T I N F O R M A T I O N : 12 2 C i n e m a D r i v e Wi l m i n g t o n , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 8 4 0 3 (9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( O ) ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F ) NC L i c e n s e # : C - 2 8 4 6 PR E L I M I N A R Y D E S I G N - N O T R E L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S C O N D I T I O N A L R E Z O N I N G EX-1 05 . 0 1 . 2 3 1" = 1 0 0 ' - JR C AH E VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH 40 SITE T I M B E R D R E HO L L Y S H E L T E R R D B L U E C L A Y R D SI D B U R Y R D CAST L E H A Y N E R D N CO L L E G E R D DAIR Y FAR M R D WETWETWET WET WET WET SITE INFORMATION PROJECT ADDRESSES:5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; 5735 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 PROPERTY OWNER:HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24 BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA:± 72.39 ACRES CURRENT ZONING:I-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) CURRENT USE:UNUSED LAND FLOOD INFORMATION:THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X – MINIMAL FLOOD RISK – AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. WETLAND INFORMATION:A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING RECEIVED APPROVED BY THE USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE ADJOINING PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF WAY CONTOUR POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND WATERS OF THE US LINE 404 WETLAND 30 EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES 1.THE SITE IS HEAVILY WOODED WITH A MIXTURE OF VEGETATION AS NOTED THIS SHEET, BUT NO SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE IN SITE REVIEW PERFORMED 4/28/23. 2.2' CONTOURS SOURCED FROM NEW HANOVER COUNTY GIS DATA; FULL PROPERTY TREE & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY UNDERWAY. 3.THIS LOT IS SUBJECT TO ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE NAD83 0 50 100 200 300 400 SCALE: 1"=100' LEGEND 1,670' RADIUS LIMIT OF FAA HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED ADJACENT TO EXISTING FAA'S VOR TOWER; STRUCTURE HEIGHT ALLOWED: 55' MAX.; FAA APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 8 - 2 WET WE T WET W E T WET WE T WET WET WE T WE T WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WE T W E T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET W E T WE T WET WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WE T W E T W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WETWET WET WE T W E T W E T W E T WE T W E T WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WET W E T PT S H E A R I N PID: R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 3 ZON I N G : 1 - 1 LAN D U S E : W E A T H E R S T A T I O N PT N E T R E B A T R PID: R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 0 - 0 0 1 ZO N I N G : I - 1 LAN D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D PT H E R N T R A C T PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L CA M E R O N C O M P A N Y T I M B E R L L C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 5 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D OL D C A S T L E A P G S O U T H I N C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 2 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : C O N S T R U C T I O N S E R V I C E AN D E R S O N J O N A T H O N A PID : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MIL L E R D U S T I N A PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L ST E W A R T R A N D Y C PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DEAL MARK A PID: R01116-001-004-000 ZONING: R-15 LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL AX T E L L M I C H A E L C M A R Y L PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 7 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JIM E N E Z H E R N A N D E Z HU G O A E T U X PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MA Z A R I E G O S - P E R E Z E N W E L V E R E T U X PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MILL I S D O N A L D G L E N D O N PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JEN K I N S R U T H M PID : R 0 1 2 1 7 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L AM C S A Z T E C P R O P E R T I E S L L C PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D CR O U S E N O R M A J E A N PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 5 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DI X O N E B B O B H E I R S PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E D PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L PO P E M E T A M A R I E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L BU I L D I N G 1 BU I L D I N G 2 BU I L D I N G 8 BUILDING 4 BU I L D I N G 9 B U I L D I N G 3 B U I L D I N G 7 BU I L D I N G 5 BU I L D I N G 6 R- 1 5 Z O N I N G I-1 Z O N I N G R-15 ZONING I-1 ZONING R- 1 5 Z O N I N G I- 1 Z O N I N G STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND WETLANDS S & W READY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC PID: R01200-002-002-001 ZONING: I-2 LAND USE: CHEMICAL PLANT P H A S E 4 PHA S E 4 PHAS E 4 PHASE 4 PHAS E 2 PH A S E 3 P H A S E 2 PHA S E 2 PHAS E 3 PHASE 3 PHAS E 3 PH A S E 2 BLUE CLAY ROAD 55' PUBLIC ROW HO L L Y S H E L T E R R O A D 95 ' P U B L I C R O W LOOP C LO O P C LO O P C LOOP C LO O P C L O O P C R O A D E RO A D A ROAD A ROAD A RO A D B RO A D B RO A D B R O A D B ROAD D ROAD C RO A D C LO O P A LO O P A LOO P A LO O P A R O A D A STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND LO O P B LOOP B STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND THE UNITED S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A FEDERAL AVIAT I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N PARID: R01 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 3 D.B. 128 4 , P G . 1 5 3 3 TH E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A PA R I D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 0 - 0 0 1 D. B . 1 3 5 0 , P G . 1 5 8 5' S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K & T Y P E A B U F F E R 20' FRONT SETBACK 30' SIDE STREET MULTI-FAMILY SETBACK 25' M I N . R E Q U I R E D S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K 30 ' M I N . R E A R S E T B A C K 15' R E A R S E T B A C K 5' S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K 35 ' F R O N T M U L T I - F A M I L Y S E T B A C K PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 TH E O A S I S NE W H A N O V E R C O U N T Y NO R T H C A R O L I N A 22208.PE OL Y M P U S H O L D I N G C O M P A N Y C A S T L E H A Y N E , L L C 4 P E R C Y S T R E E T CH A R L E S T O N , S C 2 9 4 0 3 DA T E : SC A L E : DE S I G N E D : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : PEI JOB#: CO N C E P T U A L L A Y O U T : PR E L I M I N A R Y L A Y O U T : FI N A L D E S I G N : RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T : PR O J E C T S T A T U S RE V I S I O N S : DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N SEAL CL I E N T I N F O R M A T I O N : 12 2 C i n e m a D r i v e Wi l m i n g t o n , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 8 4 0 3 (9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( O ) ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F ) NC L i c e n s e # : C - 2 8 4 6 PR E L I M I N A R Y D E S I G N - N O T R E L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CO N D I T I O N A L R E Z O N I N G SI T E P L A N CRZ-1 05 . 0 1 . 2 3 1" = 1 0 0 ' AH E JR C AH E CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. AMENITY / LEASING OFFICE AND POOL 3-STORY, 27-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE APARTMENT CLUBHOUSE, AMENITY & LEASING OFFICE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE 10'x70' SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. N O R T H 0 SCALE: 1"=100' 100'200'300' MAIL KIOSK OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH 40 SITE T I M B E R D R E HO L L Y S H E L T E R R D B L U E C L A Y R D SI D B U R Y R D CAS T L E H A Y N E R D N COL L E G E R D DAIRY FARM R D RMF-L PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONAL DATA MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED MIN. LOT AREA:20,000 SF ± 1,059,379 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH:100'EXCEEDS 100' FRONT SETBACK 35'50' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (STREET):30'60' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR):25' (3 STORIES)40' MIN. REAR SETBACK:30' (3 STORIES)35' MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM:3 STORIES (W/O ADD REGS.)3 STORIES MAX. BUILDING SEPARATION 20'20' MIN. OTHER MIXED RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED* MIN. LOT AREA:5,000-17,500 SF ± 2,094,800 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH:50'EXCEEDS 50' FRONT SETBACK 20'20' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (STREET):10'10' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR):5'5' MIN. REAR SETBACK:15'15' MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM:3 STORIES MAX 2 STORIES FOR MAJORITY W/ POTENTIAL FOR 3 STORIES MIXED IN AWAY FROM BLUE CLAY RD. BUILDING SEPARATION 20'20' MIN. *NOTE: SETBACKS LISTED AS MINIMUMS APPLY IF ANY LOTS ARE CREATED DURING PLATTING; AS DRAWN THIS PLAN, ALL BUILDINGS FAR EXCEED MINIMUM SETBACKS BECAUSE NO LOTS ARE SHOWN. OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TRASH COMPACTOR PUMP STATION EXISTING DITCH; POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND WATERS OF THE US, TYP. 24' 1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT 6" STONE UNDER CURBING PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. 6"- ABC BASE 2"-S9.5B SURFACE VARIES CONCRETE SIDEWALK SLOPE 18' 1.80% SLOPE TRAVELWAY PARKING STALL SLOPE 24' 1/4" PER FT MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB SLOPES= 3:1 1' 6"-B25.0B BASE 1/4" PER FT 6" STONE UNDER CURBING 1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE VARIES 1' 1'1' SLOPES= 3:1 5'DRIVEWAY TOWNHOME VARIES DRIVEWAY TOWNHOME 18' MIN.18' MIN. 1' 1' MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB 5' 1' 1' 5' WIDTH - SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: PHASING 1.THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN MULTIPLE PHASES, 4 ANTICIPATED LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES 1.STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5.4.6 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 2.BUFFERYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (SOUTHERN & EASTERN PROPERTY LINE) WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 5.4.3 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 3.ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UDO. SIDEWALKS 1.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.3.3.J.f OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO STORMWATER & UTILITIES 1.STORM WATER SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NEW HANOVER COUNTY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. PONDS SHOWN IN GENERAL LOCATION AT THIS TIME, BUT DESIGN WILL ALTER AS ENGINEERING DESIGN PROGRESSES. 2.PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE SITE. ALL DESIGN AND PERMITTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CFPUA, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, AND STATE REGULATORS AS REQUIRED. LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE WETWETWET WET WET WET WETLANDS PROPOSED PHASE LINE POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND WATERS OF THE US LINE PROPOSED BUILDINGS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER W PROPOSED WATER LINE FM PROPOSED FORCEMAIN ZONING DIVISION LINE SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESSES:5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; 5735 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 PROPERTY OWNER:HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24 BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) PROPOSED USE:MIXED RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA:± 72.39 ACRES MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:± 24.32 ACRES TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX:± 48.09 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: I-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) PROPOSED ZONING:RMF-L MAX DENSITY ALLOWED IN RMF-L:10 DU / AC (724 UNITS) MAX PROJECT DENSITY PROPOSED:7.20 DU / AC TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS:521 UNITS MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS:243 UNITS TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX:278 UNITS MA I L KI O S K VOR 1,670' RADIUS; 55' HEIGHT LIMITATION FOR BUILDINGS WITHIN THIS AREA; FAA APPROVAL REQUIRED TR E E L I N E TR E E L I N E TREE L I N E T R E E L I N E BU F F E R T O M U L T I - F A M I L Y EXISTING R-15 CORRIDOR ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD; NO BUILDINGS PROPOSED WITHIN R-15 AREA TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFER TO EXISTING HOMES ALONG BLUE CLAY RD. VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER / STREET YARD, TYP. VA R I A B L E W I D T H B U F F E R / ST R E E T Y A R D , T Y P . TREE LINE BU F F E R T O M I X E D R E S I D E N T I A L 24' 1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT 6" ABC UNDER CURBING PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. SLOPES= 3:1 24" VERTICAL CURB 6"-ABC BASE 2"-S9.5C SURFACE 1.5' 0.5' 18' 1/4" PER FT 6.5' SIDEWALK VARIES -SEE PLAN PARKING SPACE DRIVE AISLE SLOPES= 3:1 1.5' 18' 1/4" PER FT 6.5' SIDEWALK VARIES - SEE PLAN PARKING SPACE UTILITY AND ACCESS EASMENT 0.5' TOWNHOUSE BLDG, TYP. EXISTING CONDITIONS/ ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES: FLOOD INFORMATION:THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X – MINIMAL FLOOD RISK – AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. WETLAND: INFORMATION:A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION AS PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED BY THE USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 SPECIMEN TREES:NO SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE. TREE LINE REPRESENTS AREA INTENDED TO PRESERVE & AUGMENT, WHEN NEEDED, EXISTING VEGETATION AS BUFFER, TYP. MAIN APARTMENT ACCESS SECONDARY APARTMENT ACCESS OPEN SPACE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE:± 4.86 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 10.40 AC REMAINING MIXED RESIDENTIAL: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE:± 9.62 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 20.43 AC OPEN SPACE INCLUDES AMENITIES, WETLANDS, BUFFERS, STREETYARDS, PONDS & EASEMENTS CONDITIONAL REZONING NOTE ALL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN CONVEY THE GENERAL INTENTION OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND MAXIMUM DENSITY ANTICIPATED; DESIGN MAY REQUIRE MINOR DEVIATIONS DURING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALL DESIGN WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF APPROVAL FOR THE CONDITIONAL ZONING PLAN AND WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY'S UDO. UDO SECTION 10.3.3.C.7.b FURTHER IDENTIFIES EXTENT OF CHANGE ALLOWED BEFORE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BOARD REVIEW. PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY TRC AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 8 - 3 April 12, 2023 Mr. Jonathan Guy, PE, PTOE, AICP Kimley Horn Associates 115 Fairchild Street, Suite 250 Charleston, SC 29492 RE: Approval with conditions of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed Castle Hayne Residential development located in New Hanover County, NC. Dear Mr. Guy: The WMPO, NCDOT and New Hanover County staffs have reviewed the Blue Clay Residential TIA (sealed February 16, 2023) and based on the information provided and conversations held to date, it is our understanding that the proposed development has a build out year of 2026 and will consist of: o ITE Land Use Code 210 – Single Family detached housing 57 DU o ITE Land Use Code 215 – Single Family attached housing (duplexes) 231 DU o ITE Land Use Code 221 – Multi-family (mid-rise) housing 240 DU Based upon the review of the analysis provided, the following improvements are required of this development: I-40 Eastbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) (Stop-controlled intersection) • Signalize the intersection. I-40 Westbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) (Stop-controlled intersection) Option 1 (Recommended) Signalize the intersection and provide necessary coordination. Option 2 Construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on I-40 westbound ramps, with 400 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration, and taper. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 9 - 1 Approval with conditions of the Castle Hayne Residential (New Hanover County) Traffic Impact Analysis Page 2 of 3 SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) (Stop-controlled intersection) • Construct an eastbound right turn lane on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. • Construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) and SR 1336 (Sidbury Road) (Stop-controlled intersection) • No improvements are required. SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and Site Access 1 (Proposed stop-controlled intersection) • Construct an eastbound right turn taper of 200 feet on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road). • Construct site access (northbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for northbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access 2 (Stop-controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Kerry Drive/Site Access 3 (Stop-controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Site Access 4 (Proposed stop-controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 75 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. If changes are made to the proposed site driveways and/or land uses, the current trip distribution may need to be modified and would require a revised Traffic Impact Analysis to be submitted for review by the NCDOT, WMPO, and New Hanover County, in which instance this approval would become null and void. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable New Hanover County and NCDOT permits for access to the road network. A copy of this TIA approval shall be included with any NCDOT driveway permit application. All applicable NCDOT and New Hanover County technical standards and policies shall apply. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 9 - 2 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 9 - 3 Castle Hayne Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page iii February 2023 Executive Summary The proposed Castle Hayne Residential Development is located in Castle Hayne, NC along Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road within a currently vacant parcel of land. This parcel of land is bound by Holly Shelter Road to the north, single-family residences to the south, Blue Clay Road to the east, and vacant land to the west. Based on the current site plan, the proposed development is anticipated to consist of approximately 57 detached houses, 231 duplexes, and 240 apartment units to be constructed and occupied by the end of 2026. New trips generated by the development are expected to utilize one driveway along Holly Shelter Road and three driveways along Blue Clay Road for access to the surrounding roadway network. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates traffic operations under 2022 Existing, 2026 No-Build, and 2026 Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following study intersections: 1. Holly Shelter Road at I-40 EB Ramps 2. Holly Shelter Road at I-40 WB Ramps 3. Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road 4. Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road 5. Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 6. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant 7. Blue Clay at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive 8. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 The TIA scoping document associated with this project was initially reviewed and approved by the Wilmington Urban Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) on October 26, 2022 and revised on January 12, 2023. The revised TIA scoping document is included in Appendix B for reference. Kimley-Horn was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development and identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate these impacts in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Congestion Management Capacity Analysis Guidelines, NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways, and WMPO Traffic Impact Analysis Supplemental Guidelines. Based on capacity analysis results, the following recommendations are offered: Holly Shelter Road at I-40 EB Ramps Place the intersection under traffic signal control. Operate the westbound left-turn movement with protected/permissive phasing. Operate the eastbound right-turn movement with permitted-overlap phasing to run concurrently with the I-40 EB off-ramp approach. Holly Shelter Road at I-40 WB Ramps Construct a northbound left-turn lane with a storage of 400 feet and appropriate taper length. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 10 - 1 Castle Hayne Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page iv February 2023 Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road Construct an eastbound right-turn lane with a minimum storage of 100 feet and appropriate taper length. Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 Construct Site Access #1 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant Construct Site Access #2 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive Construct Site Access #3 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 Construct Site Access #4 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Recommended improvements are summarized in Figure ES-1. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 10 - 2 Concept Plan Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 11 - 1 WET WE T WET W E T WET WE T WET WET WE T WE T WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T WE T W E T W E T WET WE T WE T WE T WET WE T WET WE T WE T WE T WE T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET WET WET W E T WET W E T WE T WET WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WE T WET WET WE T WE T W E T W E T WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WET WE T WET WET WETWET WET WE T W E T W E T W E T WE T W E T WE T WET W E T WET WET WET WE T WE T W E T WE T W E T W E T WET WET WE T WE T WET WET W E T WET WET W E T PT S H E A R I N PID: R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 3 ZON I N G : 1 - 1 LAN D U S E : W E A T H E R S T A T I O N PT N E T R E B A T R PID: R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 0 - 0 0 1 ZO N I N G : I - 1 LAN D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D PT H E R N T R A C T PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L CA M E R O N C O M P A N Y T I M B E R L L C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 5 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D OL D C A S T L E A P G S O U T H I N C PI D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 2 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : I - 2 LA N D U S E : C O N S T R U C T I O N S E R V I C E AN D E R S O N J O N A T H O N A PID : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MIL L E R D U S T I N A PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L ST E W A R T R A N D Y C PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DEAL MARK A PID: R01116-001-004-000 ZONING: R-15 LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL AX T E L L M I C H A E L C M A R Y L PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 7 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JIM E N E Z H E R N A N D E Z HU G O A E T U X PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 8 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MA Z A R I E G O S - P E R E Z E N W E L V E R E T U X PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 9 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MILL I S D O N A L D G L E N D O N PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L RUI Z L U Z PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L JEN K I N S R U T H M PID : R 0 1 2 1 7 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZON I N G : R - 1 5 LAN D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L AM C S A Z T E C P R O P E R T I E S L L C PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : V A C A N T L A N D CR O U S E N O R M A J E A N PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 5 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L DI X O N E B B O B H E I R S PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 4 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L GR I Z Z L E G E O R G E D PID : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 2 1 3 - 0 0 3 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L MU R R E L L C A N D A C E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L PO P E M E T A M A R I E PI D : R 0 1 1 1 6 - 0 0 2 - 0 0 1 - 0 0 0 ZO N I N G : R - 1 5 LA N D U S E : R E S I D E N T I A L BU I L D I N G 1 BU I L D I N G 2 BU I L D I N G 8 BUILDING 4 BU I L D I N G 9 B U I L D I N G 3 B U I L D I N G 7 BU I L D I N G 5 BU I L D I N G 6 R- 1 5 Z O N I N G I-1 Z O N I N G R-15 ZONING I-1 ZONING R- 1 5 Z O N I N G I- 1 Z O N I N G STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND WETLANDS S & W READY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC PID: R01200-002-002-001 ZONING: I-2 LAND USE: CHEMICAL PLANT P H A S E 4 PHA S E 4 PHAS E 4 PHASE 4 PHAS E 2 PH A S E 3 P H A S E 2 PHA S E 2 PHAS E 3 PHASE 3 PHAS E 3 PH A S E 2 BLUE CLAY ROAD 55' PUBLIC ROW HO L L Y S H E L T E R R O A D 95 ' P U B L I C R O W LOOP C LO O P C LO O P C LOOP C LO O P C L O O P C R O A D E RO A D A ROAD A ROAD A RO A D B RO A D B RO A D B R O A D B ROAD D ROAD C RO A D C LO O P A LO O P A LOO P A LO O P A R O A D A STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND LO O P B LOOP B STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND THE UNITED S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A FEDERAL AVIAT I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N PARID: R01 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 1 - 0 0 3 D.B. 128 4 , P G . 1 5 3 3 TH E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A PA R I D : R 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 0 8 - 0 1 0 - 0 0 1 D. B . 1 3 5 0 , P G . 1 5 8 5' S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K & T Y P E A B U F F E R 20' FRONT SETBACK 30' SIDE STREET MULTI-FAMILY SETBACK 25' M I N . R E Q U I R E D S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K 30 ' M I N . R E A R S E T B A C K 15' R E A R S E T B A C K 5' S I D E I N T E R I O R S E T B A C K 35 ' F R O N T M U L T I - F A M I L Y S E T B A C K PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 PH A S E 2 PH A S E 1 TH E O A S I S NE W H A N O V E R C O U N T Y NO R T H C A R O L I N A 22208.PE OL Y M P U S H O L D I N G C O M P A N Y C A S T L E H A Y N E , L L C 4 P E R C Y S T R E E T CH A R L E S T O N , S C 2 9 4 0 3 DA T E : SC A L E : DE S I G N E D : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : PEI JOB#: CO N C E P T U A L L A Y O U T : PR E L I M I N A R Y L A Y O U T : FI N A L D E S I G N : RE L E A S E D F O R C O N S T : PR O J E C T S T A T U S RE V I S I O N S : DR A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N SEAL CL I E N T I N F O R M A T I O N : 12 2 C i n e m a D r i v e Wi l m i n g t o n , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 8 4 0 3 (9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( O ) ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F ) NC L i c e n s e # : C - 2 8 4 6 PR E L I M I N A R Y D E S I G N - N O T R E L E A S E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CO N D I T I O N A L R E Z O N I N G SI T E P L A N CRZ-1 05 . 0 1 . 2 3 1" = 1 0 0 ' AH E JR C AH E CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. AMENITY / LEASING OFFICE AND POOL 3-STORY, 27-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE APARTMENT CLUBHOUSE, AMENITY & LEASING OFFICE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE 10'x70' SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. N O R T H 0 SCALE: 1"=100' 100'200'300' MAIL KIOSK OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH 40 SITE T I M B E R D R E HO L L Y S H E L T E R R D B L U E C L A Y R D SI D B U R Y R D CAS T L E H A Y N E R D N COL L E G E R D DAIRY FARM R D RMF-L PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONAL DATA MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED MIN. LOT AREA:20,000 SF ± 1,059,379 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH:100'EXCEEDS 100' FRONT SETBACK 35'50' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (STREET):30'60' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR):25' (3 STORIES)40' MIN. REAR SETBACK:30' (3 STORIES)35' MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM:3 STORIES (W/O ADD REGS.)3 STORIES MAX. BUILDING SEPARATION 20'20' MIN. OTHER MIXED RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED* MIN. LOT AREA:5,000-17,500 SF ± 2,094,800 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH:50'EXCEEDS 50' FRONT SETBACK 20'20' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (STREET):10'10' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR):5'5' MIN. REAR SETBACK:15'15' MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM:3 STORIES MAX 2 STORIES FOR MAJORITY W/ POTENTIAL FOR 3 STORIES MIXED IN AWAY FROM BLUE CLAY RD. BUILDING SEPARATION 20'20' MIN. *NOTE: SETBACKS LISTED AS MINIMUMS APPLY IF ANY LOTS ARE CREATED DURING PLATTING; AS DRAWN THIS PLAN, ALL BUILDINGS FAR EXCEED MINIMUM SETBACKS BECAUSE NO LOTS ARE SHOWN. OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TRASH COMPACTOR PUMP STATION EXISTING DITCH; POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND WATERS OF THE US, TYP. 24' 1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT 6" STONE UNDER CURBING PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. 6"- ABC BASE 2"-S9.5B SURFACE VARIES CONCRETE SIDEWALK SLOPE 18' 1.80% SLOPE TRAVELWAY PARKING STALL SLOPE 24' 1/4" PER FT MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB SLOPES= 3:1 1' 6"-B25.0B BASE 1/4" PER FT 6" STONE UNDER CURBING 1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE VARIES 1' 1'1' SLOPES= 3:1 5'DRIVEWAY TOWNHOME VARIES DRIVEWAY TOWNHOME 18' MIN.18' MIN. 1' 1' MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB 5' 1' 1' 5' WIDTH - SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: PHASING 1.THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN MULTIPLE PHASES, 4 ANTICIPATED LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES 1.STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5.4.6 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 2.BUFFERYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (SOUTHERN & EASTERN PROPERTY LINE) WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 5.4.3 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 3.ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UDO. SIDEWALKS 1.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.3.3.J.f OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO STORMWATER & UTILITIES 1.STORM WATER SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NEW HANOVER COUNTY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. PONDS SHOWN IN GENERAL LOCATION AT THIS TIME, BUT DESIGN WILL ALTER AS ENGINEERING DESIGN PROGRESSES. 2.PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE SITE. ALL DESIGN AND PERMITTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CFPUA, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, AND STATE REGULATORS AS REQUIRED. LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE WETWETWET WET WET WET WETLANDS PROPOSED PHASE LINE POTENTIAL NON-WETLAND WATERS OF THE US LINE PROPOSED BUILDINGS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER W PROPOSED WATER LINE FM PROPOSED FORCEMAIN ZONING DIVISION LINE SITE DATA PROJECT ADDRESSES:5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; 5735 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 PROPERTY OWNER:HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24 BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) PROPOSED USE:MIXED RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:GENERAL RESIDENTIAL TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA:± 72.39 ACRES MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:± 24.32 ACRES TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX:± 48.09 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: I-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) PROPOSED ZONING:RMF-L MAX DENSITY ALLOWED IN RMF-L:10 DU / AC (724 UNITS) MAX PROJECT DENSITY PROPOSED:7.20 DU / AC TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS:521 UNITS MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS:243 UNITS TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX:278 UNITS MA I L KI O S K VOR 1,670' RADIUS; 55' HEIGHT LIMITATION FOR BUILDINGS WITHIN THIS AREA; FAA APPROVAL REQUIRED TR E E L I N E TR E E L I N E TREE L I N E T R E E L I N E BU F F E R T O M U L T I - F A M I L Y EXISTING R-15 CORRIDOR ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD; NO BUILDINGS PROPOSED WITHIN R-15 AREA TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFER TO EXISTING HOMES ALONG BLUE CLAY RD. VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER / STREET YARD, TYP. VA R I A B L E W I D T H B U F F E R / ST R E E T Y A R D , T Y P . TREE LINE BU F F E R T O M I X E D R E S I D E N T I A L 24' 1/4" PER FT1/4" PER FT 6" ABC UNDER CURBING PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. SLOPES= 3:1 24" VERTICAL CURB 6"-ABC BASE 2"-S9.5C SURFACE 1.5' 0.5' 18' 1/4" PER FT 6.5' SIDEWALK VARIES -SEE PLAN PARKING SPACE DRIVE AISLE SLOPES= 3:1 1.5' 18' 1/4" PER FT 6.5' SIDEWALK VARIES - SEE PLAN PARKING SPACE UTILITY AND ACCESS EASMENT 0.5' TOWNHOUSE BLDG, TYP. EXISTING CONDITIONS/ ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES: FLOOD INFORMATION:THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X – MINIMAL FLOOD RISK – AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. WETLAND: INFORMATION:A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION AS PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED BY THE USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 SPECIMEN TREES:NO SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE. TREE LINE REPRESENTS AREA INTENDED TO PRESERVE & AUGMENT, WHEN NEEDED, EXISTING VEGETATION AS BUFFER, TYP. MAIN APARTMENT ACCESS SECONDARY APARTMENT ACCESS OPEN SPACE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE:± 4.86 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 10.40 AC REMAINING MIXED RESIDENTIAL: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE:± 9.62 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 20.43 AC OPEN SPACE INCLUDES AMENITIES, WETLANDS, BUFFERS, STREETYARDS, PONDS & EASEMENTS CONDITIONAL REZONING NOTE ALL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN CONVEY THE GENERAL INTENTION OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND MAXIMUM DENSITY ANTICIPATED; DESIGN MAY REQUIRE MINOR DEVIATIONS DURING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALL DESIGN WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF APPROVAL FOR THE CONDITIONAL ZONING PLAN AND WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY'S UDO. UDO SECTION 10.3.3.C.7.b FURTHER IDENTIFIES EXTENT OF CHANGE ALLOWED BEFORE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BOARD REVIEW. PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY TRC AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 12 - 1 Public Comments In Support 0 Neutral 1 In Opposition 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 1 Farrell, Robert From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Friday, May 26, 2023 2:05 PM To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject:Online Form Submission #3603 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name David Last Name Crosby Address 2235 Gateway Access Point STE 400 City Raleigh State NC Zip Code 27607 Email buzz.crosby@martinmarietta.com Projects available for comment. PB Meeting - Z23-12 - Oasis on Blue Clay and Holly Shelter - Residential Development What is the nature of your comment? Neutral Public Comment Re: Rezoning Request Z23-12 – Petition to Rezone 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road (the “Subject Property”) Dear Honorable Members of the New Hanover County Planning Board: Martin Marietta is pleased to be a member of the New Hanover County and Castle Hayne community as the long-time operator of the Castle Hayne Quarry and Rail Yard located at 5635 Holly Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 2 Shelter Road (the “Martin Marietta Property”). The Martin Marietta Property is an active operation that includes quarrying and transloading activities. Our investments in the community are well established and will continue to provide a positive impact for its residents for years to come. We are proud to be part of New Hanover County’s long-term growth and prosperity. We understand the owner of the property located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road, the Subject Property, has filed a rezoning application to allow development for residential use. The Subject Property is located south of our property. As a fully operational quarry and aggregates rail yard, there will be ongoing mining activities including but not limited to crushing, blasting, aggregate processing, heavy equipment operations, rail car unloading, and truck loading, that will occur on the property itself, along with the ongoing use of Holly Shelter Road, as well as other ancillary operations that may occur on our land adjacent to the actual quarry and yard. Martin Marietta is committed to being a responsible neighbor, and we have a history of mutual cooperation with our residential neighbors at other sites throughout the country. Given the Martin Marietta Property is already authorized for quarrying and rail yard operations, we want to ensure that the County Commissioners, Planning Board, and the potential developer of the Subject Property are aware of the current and future use of our property. The proposed zoning map would locate all of the proposed multifamily development approximately 3,500 feet west of the Castle Hayne Quarry and Rail Yard entrance, which places any residential access to Holly Shelter Road between industrial operations, and the corresponding traffic, and the shortest access to Interstate 40. We respectfully ask the Planning Board to consider requiring the developer to give notice of the existence of the quarry and our existing operations to any residential purchaser or tenant. Martin Marietta values our community partnerships and neighbor relationships. I appreciate your consideration and would be happy to visit with the board in-person at any time. Best regards, David N. Crosby Regional Vice President Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 3 Farrell, Robert From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Wednesday, May 31, 2023 9:54 AM To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject:Online Form Submission #3656 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name Shawn Last Name Baker Address 5312 Holly Shelter Rd. PO Box 400 City Castle Hayne State NC Zip Code 28429 Email sbaker@snwreadymix.com Projects available for comment. PB Meeting - Z23-12 - Oasis on Blue Clay and Holly Shelter - Residential Development What is the nature of your comment? Oppose project Public Comment See attached letter. Thank you. Upload supporting files If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload the files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc, docx, ppt, pptx, txt, pdf, jpg, png. File 1 New Hanover County (Rezoning Ltr) (5.31).pdf Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 4 Titan America LLC 5700 Lake Wright Drive Suite 300 Norfolk, Virginia 23502 Telephone (757) 858-6500 Fax (757) 855-7707 www.titanamerica.com May 31, 2023 New Hanover County Planning Board 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Rezoning Request Z23-12 – Petition to Rezone 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road (the “Subject Property”) To Whom it May Concern: S&W Ready Mix Concrete Company LLC (“S&W”), as a proud member of the New Hanover County and Castle Hayne Community and owner/operator of the concrete manufacturing facility located at 5312 Holly Shelter Road, submits this letter in formal opposition to the pending rezoning application that has been filed by the owner of the above-referenced Subject Property, which purports to rezone that property as residential. Due to the nature of our business and other businesses in the area, we have significant concerns related to this rezoning. S&W is and always has been committed to being an involved, understanding, and responsible neighbor and member of the community. As such, we thought it prudent to submit this letter to ensure that the County Commissioners, Planning Board, and potential developers of the Subject Property are fully aware of S&W’s current use of our property due to the proximity of the Subject Property. Our facility (as well as many other industrial sites in the area) often begins operations extremely early in the morning, which means the operation of a variety of equipment and vehicles necessary to support the business. The lights, noise, and traffic associated with this equipment and these vehicles is wholly incompatible with a neighboring residential development. We ask the Planning Board to take into consideration this incompatibility. Heavy industrial operations and residential developments can certainly manage to coexist; however, to do so zoning and planning must be carefully considered to maintain consistency among the expectations and needs of the overall community. The proposed commingling of zoning classifications here, Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 5 however, undoubtedly clouds these needs and expectations in a way that can be wholly avoided by a denial of the rezoning application. If the rezoning application is approved, we will of course remain committed to our role in the community. In such instance, however, we must request that the developer be required to provide comprehensive notice of and information related to our existing facility and operations to any prospective purchaser or tenant. Respectfully submitted, Shawn Baker General Manager Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 1 - 13 - 6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/6/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Robert Farrell, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Robert Farrell; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Rezoning Request (Z23-14) – Request by Wes Reynolds with SB Co7ages Investment, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 7.37 acres of land located at 7641, 7645, and 7647 Carolina Beach Road from R- 15, ResidenCal to (CZD) R-5 ResidenCal for a maximum of 56 a7ached single family dwelling units. BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 7.37 acres from the R-15, Residen)al zoning district to the (CZD) R-5, Residen)al district for a maximum 50 unit a/ached single-family development. The concept plan consists of 50 a/ached single-family dwellings on four side streets. Dwelling unit configura)ons include duplex, triplex, and quadraplex units with required open space. Eight access points are proposed along the exis)ng easement. Four provide access to mul)ple units with four units having direct access west of the curve in the easement. Four stormwater infiltra)on areas have been proposed for the project located on the southern and eastern por)ons of the project. Private u)lity provider Aqua has provided a le/er of intent to provide water and sewer service for the proposed development. The concept plan iden)fies two significant Live Oak and other significant trees on the property. A condi)on has been provided to preserve the trees as iden)fied on the concept plan that are not removed for essen)al site improvements. Four areas of the property have been delineated as wetlands. The Army Corps of Engineers has confirmed they are considered waters of the state and are not federally regulated. This determina)on was made before recent changes to the federal defini)on of wetland. The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the )me, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure housing served by private sep)c and wells would be developed at low densi)es. Since that )me, private water and sewer services have available to the surrounding area, however, the Carolina Beach Road corridor remains primarily zoned for low density housing. The purpose of the R-5 district is to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density residen)al development on smaller lots with a compact and walkable development pa/ern. The district allows a range of housing types and can be developed in conjunc)on with a non-residen)al district to create a ver)cal mixed-use development pa/ern as well as serve as a transi)on between mixed-use or commercial development and low to moderate density residen)al development. As currently zoned, the site would be permi/ed up to 18 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre under the performance residen)al development standards. The proposed 50 units equate to an overall density of 6.7 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 dwelling units per acre. It is es)mated the site would generate approximately 16 AM and 20 PM peak hour trips if developed at the permi/ed density for performance development in the R-15 district. The proposed R-5 development is es)mated to generate 20 AM and 26 PM peak hour trips, increasing the es)mated number of peak hour trips by approximately 4 AM and 6 PM trips. The proposed project is located along a service road parallel to a major arterial roadway with available capacity in the southern por)on of the highway corridor. Access to the service road is near a signalized intersec)on onto Carolina Beach Road which increases the poten)al for vehicle conflicts entering the intersec)on. The local roads do not connect to other parts of the surrounding network and therefore have low daily es)mated vehicle counts. The lack of available NCDOT data indicates the roads do not currently experience heavy enough traffic volumes to warrant monitoring. While there is no specific data available to indicate current or an)cipated impacts to roadway capacity the increase in es)mated trips generated by the proposed development is minimal. The es)mated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary School, Murray Middle School, and Ashley High School. Based on a generalized historic genera)on rate, staff would es)mate the increase in homes would result in approximately 7 more students than the es)mated number of students generated under exis)ng zoning. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Mixed Use, a land use classifica)on that promotes a mix of retail, office, and residen)al development at moderate densi)es up to 15 units per acre. This classifica)on is generally applied to areas intended as community-level service nodes and / or transi)ons between lower density housing and higher intensity development. The site is within the historic Seabreeze community which served as a beach resort community for African Americans from the 1930s through the 1950s. While the subject site is undeveloped, a few structures from this community remain in the area along Seabreeze Road. This area was the focus of the Seabreeze Small Area Plan created in 1988. The recommenda)ons for the area included revitaliza)on of the businesses and redevelopment of the waterfront. However, since the adop)on of the plan this revitaliza)on has not been accomplished and some of the historic structures and proper)es have been converted into luxury homes. The proposed rezoning request is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type are in line with the recommenda)ons of the Community Mixed Use place type and the proposed development would act as an appropriate transi)on between the highway and exis)ng and detached single- family residen)al development. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff’s recommenda)on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera)ons, and technical review. The Carolina Beach Road corridor has been designated as Community Mixed Use within the Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 Comprehensive Plan. The plan recommends a mix of commercial uses and residen)al housing types that act as a transi)on between higher intensity and lower intensity development and iden)fies the scale of the recommended development as up to 3 stories and 15 du / ac. The scale and density of the proposed development is below the recommenda)ons for the place type and the proposed housing type provides transi)ons from the highway to exis)ng residen)al uses. The proposed addi)onal condi)ons are intended to promote environmentally responsible growth by reducing impacts to environmental and conserva)on resources. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the request and suggests the following mo)on: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type is within the recommenda)ons of the Community Mixed Use place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project provides housing diversity at an appropriate density to act as a transi)on between the highway and residen)al development to the east and the proposed addi)onal condi)ons reduce some impacts on environmental features. Proposed CondiCons: 1. The project as shown on the submi/ed site plan shall be developed with water and sewer connec)ons to a private wastewater system. Private wells and sep)c systems are not allowed for residen)al development as contemplated on the site plan. 2. As iden)fied on the site plan, certain exis)ng trees onsite will not be removed. 3. The zoning approval and development contemplated therein shall not impact the current and future lot owners of the following parcels, R08518-001-014-004, R08518-001-015-000, and R08518-001-015-002, right to use the access easement shown on the concept plan, nor shall the zoning approval and development contemplated therein create any financial burden on those lot owners to contribute to the cost of maintenance for the access road. 4. Planning staff may accept changes to the concept plan that removes residen)al units 13 and 14 from the Special Flood Hazard Area. AlternaCve MoCon for DENIAL (if based on informa)on presented at the public hearing or other considera)on beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds denial appropriate.) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type are in line with the recommenda)ons of the Community Mixed Use place type and the proposed development acts as an appropriate transi)on between the highway and exis)ng development. I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because of the project's an)cipated impacts on environmental and conserva)on resources and the poten)al increase of vehicle conflicts on adjacent roadways. ATTACHMENTS: Descrip)on Z23-14 PB Script Z23-14 PB Staff Report Z23-14 Zoning Map Z23-14 Future Land Use Map Z23-14 Mailout Map Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 Application Cover Sheet Application Materials Concept Plan Cover Sheet Concept Plan Public Comment COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z23-14) Request by Wes Reynolds with SB Cottages Investment, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 7.37 acres of land located at 7641, 7645, and 7647 Carolina Beach Road from R-15, Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential for a maximum of 56 attached single family dwelling units. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type is within the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project provides housing diversity at an appropriate density to act as a transition between the highway and residential development to the east and the proposed additional conditions reduce some impacts on environmental features. Proposed Conditions: 1. The project as shown on the submitted site plan shall be developed with water and sewer connections to a private wastewater system. Private wells and septic systems are not allowed for residential development as contemplated on the site plan. 2. As identified on the site plan, certain existing trees onsite will not be removed. 3. The zoning approval and development contemplated therein shall not impact the current and future lot owners of the following parcels, R08518-001-014-004, R08518-001-015-000, and R08518-001-015-002, right to use the access easement shown on the concept plan, nor shall the zoning approval and development Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 contemplated therein create any additional financial burden on those lot owners to contribute to the cost of maintenance for the access road. 4. Planning staff may accept changes to the concept plan that removes residential units 13 and 14 from the Special Flood Hazard Area. Alternative Motion for DENIAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds denial appropriate.) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type are in line with the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type and the proposed development acts as an appropriate transition between the highway and existing development. I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because of the project’s anticipated impacts on environmental and conservation resources and the potential increase of vehicle conflicts on adjacent roadways. Example Motion for Denial I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) RMF-L district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 1 of 16 STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-14 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z23-14 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional R-5 district Applicant: Property Owner(s): Wes Reynolds SB Cottages Investment LLC Location: Acreage: 7641, 7645, 7647 Carolina Beach Road 7.37 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R08518-001-014-002, R08518-001-014-001, R08518-001-014-003, R08518-001-001-000 Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Vacant Wooded Land Maximum 50 attached single family dwelling units Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-15, Residential (CZD) R-5 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single Family Residential and vacant land R-15 East Single Family Residential R-15 South Single Family Residential R-15 West Single Family Residential R-15 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 2 of 16 ZONING HISTORY April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 4) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sanitary sewer services are not available through CFPUA. Private water and sewer utilities will be required through an agreement with a private utility provider or permitting for well(s) and septic system(s) through Environmental Health. Aqua has provided a letter of intent to serve 50 dwelling units for this project. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station Schools Anderson Elementary, Murray Middle, and Ashley High Schools Recreation Carolina Beach State Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation Conservation resource maps indicate pocosin wetlands exist on the property. Projects containing 5 acres or more of pocosin conservation resources are required to comply with additional buffer and conservation standards in Section 5.7 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Historic While undeveloped, the parcels are located within the historical Seabreeze neighborhood. Established in the mid-1920s, the area was a prime vacation resort for African Americans within southeastern North Carolina from the 1930s through the 1950s before a decline stemming from Hurricane Hazel in 1954, financial trouble, and the end of segregation in the 1960s. Archaeological No known archaeological resources Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 3 of 16 APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Includes Staff Markups • The concept plan consists of 50 attached single-family dwellings on four side streets. Dwelling unit configurations include duplex, triplex and quadraplex units with required open space. • Eight access points are proposed along the existing easement which would be upgraded to a private street. Four provide access to multiple units with four units having direct access west of the curve in the easement. • Four stormwater infiltration areas have been proposed for the project located on the southern and eastern portions of the project. • The concept plan identifies two significant Live Oak and other significant trees on the property. A condition has been provided to preserve the trees as identified on the concept plan that are not removed for essential site improvements. • Four areas of the property have been delineated as wetlands. The Army Corps of Engineers has confirmed they are considered waters of the state and are not federally regulated. This determination was made before recent changes to the federal definition of wetland. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. Since that time, private water and sewer services have become available to the surrounding area; however, the Carolina Beach corridor remains primarily zoned for low density housing. Wetlands Wetlands Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 4 of 16 • The northern and central portions of the Carolina Beach Road corridor have seen increased interest in higher density residential such as the 6800 Carolina Beach Road convenience store and residential development and the McQuillan Pines mixed use apartment and storage facility project to the north. • The southern portion of the Carolina Beach Road corridor has not seen consistent interest in higher density development. • As currently zoned, the site would be permitted up to 18 dwelling units at a density of 2.5 du/ac under the performance residential development standards. The proposed 50 units equate to an overall density of 6.7 du/ac, less than the 8 units per acre maximum density allowed in the R-5 district. • The R-5 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density residential development on smaller lots with a compact and walkable development pattern. The district allows a range of housing types and can be developed in conjunction with a non-residential district to create a vertical mixed-use development pattern as well as serve as a transition between mixed-use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential development. • A Type A opaque buffer is required on the north, south, and eastern borders of the project. • The site is also within the Pocosin Conservation Resource. Section 5.7 of the UDO requires areas containing or adjacent to over 5 acres of an identified conservation resource must comply with additional setbacks and other performance controls. • If approved, all structures and impervious surfaces shall be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the conservation space and retention and preservation of the conservation area either within a conservation easement or dedicated open space owned and managed by a property owners association. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and Zoning Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 5 of 16 AREA DEVELOPMENTS Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 6 of 16 TRANSPORTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning would allow a maximum of 18 single-family dwelling units. PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access Service Road at the intersection of Seabreeze Road and Service Road immediately east of the intersection of Seabreeze Road and Carolina Beach Road. Secondary Access N/A EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway Carolina Beach Road Seabreeze Road Service Road Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 7 of 16 Type of Roadway NCDOT major arterial Local Road Local Road Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 41,369 4,000* 4,000* Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 32,500 400 N/A Latest WMPO Point-in-Time Count (DT) 33,254 N/A N/A Current Level of Congestion Available Capacity Available Capacity N/A Sources Source of Planning Capacity: WMPO Source of Latest Traffic Volume: NCDOT (2021) Source of WMPO Point-in-Time County: WMPO (2022) NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADAWAY PROJECTS No Nearby STIP Projects TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic Generated by Present Designation Traffic Generated by Proposed Designation Potential Impact of Proposed Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 16 20 +4 PM Peak Hour Trips 20 26 +6 Assumptions Typical Development with Existing Zoning – 18 single family detached dwellings. Proposed Development – 50 attached single-family dwellings Sources Source of Trip Generation: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). SUMMARY The proposed project is located along a service road parallel to a major arterial roadway with available capacity in the southern portion of the highway corridor. Access to the Service Road is near a signalized intersection onto Carolina Beach Road which increases the potential for vehicle conflicts entering the intersection. The local roads do not connect to other parts of the surrounding network and therefore have low daily estimated vehicle counts. The lack of available NCDOT data indicates the roads do not currently experience heavy enough traffic volumes to warrant monitoring. While there is no specific data available to indicate current or anticipated impacts to roadway capacity the increase in estimated trips generated by the proposed development is minimal. * Seabreeze Road and Service Road do not have listed planning capacities. The WMPO and DOT use a base 4,000 vehicles per day for these road types because it is the minimum threshold necessary for DOT to discuss roadway capacity improvements. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 8 of 16 ENVIRONMENTAL • • • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area. Approximately 0.07 acres (approximately 3,000 square feet) of the project is within the Special Flood Hazard Area. The concept plan shows 2 of the proposed units will be impacted by the flood hazard. • Because the structures are attached, all four attached dwellings will be subject to the floodplain development requirements. • A condition has been provided that staff may accept changes to the concept plan that removes residential units from the Special Flood Hazard Area. • The remainder of the property is within the Shaded Zone X (0.2% annual flood risk) Special Flood Hazard Area. This is considered an area of moderate to low risk and is not subject to floodplain development requirements or density restrictions for new development. AE Flood Hazard Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 8 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 9 of 16 • The property is within watersheds ICW13 and ICW14 that drain to portions of the Intracoastal Waterway. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (Suitable), Class II (Moderate Limitation), and Class III (Severe Limitation) soils. Private water and sewer are available through utility extensions to the Aqua utility system. • Aqua has provided a letter of intent to serve the proposed development which will require an agreement between Aqua and the developer. • The concept plan delineates wetlands on the property that will be impacted by the development. The Army Corps of Engineers has stated the wetlands are considered waters of the state. The wetland designation was determined before recent changes to the federal definition of wetlands. • Development within the delineated wetlands will require review and approval by the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools • Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary School, Murray Middle School and Ashley High School. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools. • A maximum of 18 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base density, and 50 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 32 dwelling units. • Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in approximately 7 additional students than would be generated under current zoning. • The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students. Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the recent New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 9 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 10 of 16 Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield (current general student generation rate) * Existing Development 0 single-family dwellings Approximate** Total: 0 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Typical Development Under Current Zoning 18 residential units Approximate** Total: 4 (2 elementary, 1 middle, 1 high) Proposed Zoning 50 residential units Approximate** Total: 12 (5 elementary, 3 middle, 4 high) *The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out- of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech. **Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the approximate total. • Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades. School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year) *Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year. **Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time. • The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data, planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded. New Hanover County Strategic Plan • One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services. Level Total NHC Capacity School Projected Enrollment of Assignment School Capacity of Assigned School w/Portables Capacity of Assigned School Funded or Planned Capacity Upgrades Elementary 91% Anderson 291 314 93% None Middle 92% Murray 882 889 99% None High 93% Ashley 1983 1990 99.6% None Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 10 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 11 of 16 • The proposed conditional R-5 zoning district would allow for an increase in housing diversity and would allow those residents to utilize existing goods and services within one mile of the subject property. • The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 80%. Under the proposed R-5 district the site would allow for single family attached (townhomes) and increase housing type diversity by reducing the percentage of single-family detached (80% to 79%) and increasing the percentage of single family attached units (9% to 11%). • The subject property is located in the Snow’s Cut community area, where 22% of residents currently live within one mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples, pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor’s office, child & adult care, etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum, etc.). The proposed R-5 district would increase the number of residences within one mile of goods and services (22% to 24%). Representative Developments Representative Developments of R-15: Cypress Village Subdivision Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 11 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 12 of 16 Old Cape Cod Subdivision Representative Development of Attached Single Family Dwellings Plantation Village Subdivision Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 12 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 13 of 16 Marsh Oaks Subdivision Context and Compatibility • The property is located near the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and Seabreeze Road, an area that has not experienced the same interest in higher density growth as the northern and central portions of the Carolina Beach Road corridor. • The site is within the historic Seabreeze community which served as a beach resort community for African Americans from the 1930s through the 1950s. While the subject site is undeveloped, a few structures from this community remain in the area along Seabreeze Road. • This area was the focus of the Seabreeze Small Area Plan created in 1988. The recommendations for the area included revitalization of the businesses and redevelopment of the waterfront. However, since the adoption of the plan this revitalization has not been accomplished and some of the historic structures and properties have been converted into luxury homes. • A prior rezoning request in the Seabreeze area for higher density residential development was reviewed by the Planning Board in the Fall of 2022. While the Comprehensive Plan and the previous Seabreeze Small Area Plan proposed higher density growth for the revitalization of Seabreeze, the feedback from the public indicated the desired development patterns for the area has shifted towards a preference for density consistent with current development patterns. • The existing land uses in the area include a mix of small and large single-family dwellings. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 13 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 14 of 16 • The proposed attached housing type increases housing type diversity in the area and acts as a transition between the Carolina Beach Road corridor to the west and lower density housing east. • The proposed density of 6.7 du / ac is below the maximum allowed for the R-5 zoning district and less than the maximum recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type. • Additional conditions have been provided guaranteeing tree retention, utility service, access to current owners along the existing easement, and reducing development in flood prone areas. • Several environmentally sensitive areas have been identified on the property including state regulated wetlands, the AE Special Flood Hazard Area, Pocosin conservation resources, and several significant and specimen trees. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Place Type Description Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 14 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 15 of 16 Analysis The proposed development is located south of the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and Seabreeze Road, in the historic Seabreeze community. The proposed density of 6.7 du / ac is below the maximum allowed for the R-5 zoning district and less than the maximum recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type. Several environmentally sensitive areas have been identified on the property including state regulated wetlands, the AE Special Flood Hazard Area, Pocosin conservation resources, and several significant and specimen trees. A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to promote environmentally responsible growth by promoting a mixture of uses, where appropriate, in an effort to cluster development and minimize impacts on natural resources. Additional conditions have been provided guaranteeing tree retention, utility service, access to current owners along the existing easement, and reducing development in flood prone areas. Consistency Recommendation The proposed rezoning request is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type are in line with the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type and the proposed development would act as an appropriate transition between the highway and existing detached single-family residential development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. The Carolina Beach Road corridor has been designated as Community Mixed Use within the Comprehensive Plan. The plan recommends a mix of commercial uses and residential housing types that act as a transition between higher intensity and lower intensity development and identifies the scale of the recommended development as up to 3 stories and 15 du / ac. The scale and density of the proposed development is below the recommendations for the place type and the proposed housing type provides transitions from the highway to existing residential uses. The proposed additional conditions are intended to promote environmentally responsible growth by reducing impacts to environmental and conservation resources. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the request and suggests the following motion: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type is within the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project provides housing diversity at an appropriate density to act as a transition between the highway and residential development to the east and the proposed additional conditions reduce some impacts on environmental features. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 15 Z23-14 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 16 of 16 Proposed Conditions: 1. The project as shown on the submitted site plan shall be developed with water and sewer connections to a private wastewater system. Private wells and septic systems are not allowed for residential development as contemplated on the site plan. 2. As identified on the site plan, certain existing trees onsite will not be removed. 3. The zoning approval and development contemplated therein shall not impact the current and future lot owners of the following parcels, R08518-001-014- 004, R08518-001-015-000, and R08518-001-015-002, right to use the access easement shown on the concept plan, nor shall the zoning approval and development contemplated therein create any additional financial burden on those lot owners to contribute to the cost of maintenance for the access road. 4. Planning staff may accept changes to the concept plan that removes residential units 13 and 14 from the Special Flood Hazard Area. Alternative Motion for DENIAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds denial appropriate.) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density and housing type are in line with the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type and the proposed development acts as an appropriate transition between the highway and existing development. I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because of the project’s anticipated impacts on environmental and conservation resources and the potential increase of vehicle conflicts on adjacent roadways. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 16 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1 Initial Application Documents & Materials Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1 Page 1 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Public Hearing Procedures (Optional) Pre-Application Conference 1 Community Information Meeting 2 Application Submittal & Acceptance 3 Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional) 4 Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification 5 Planning Board Hearing & Recom- mendation 6 Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision 7 Post-Decision Limitations and Actions 1.Applicant and Property Owner Information Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) Company/Owner Name 2 Address Address City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Phone Phone Email Wes Reynolds Sri Gali 4004 NC 55 Hwy Cary, NC 27519 919-645-8617 skgali@gmail.com SB Cottages Investment LLC wreynolds@mc1.biz Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1 Name Address City State Zip Property Address Tax PIN Tax PID 1 SB COTTAGES INVESTMENT LLC 4004 NC 55 HWY CARY NC 27519 Wilmington N.C. 28412 7641 Carolina Beach Rd.313110.35.8885.000 R08518-001-001-000 2 SB COTTAGES INVESTMENT LLC 4004 NC 55 HWY CARY NC 27519 Wilmington N.C. 28428 7647 Carolina Beach Rd.313110.35.9685.000 R08518-001-014-001 3 SB COTTAGES INVESTMENT LLC 4004 NC 55 HWY CARY NC 27519 Wilmington N.C. 28428 313110.35.9566.000 R08518-001-014-002 4 SB COTTAGES INVESTMENT LLC 4004 NC 55 HWY CARY NC 27519 Wilmington N.C. 28428 7647 Carolina Beach Rd.313110.45.3728.000 R08518-001-014-003 Included Property Owners' List Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 2.Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3.Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4.Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 7641, 7645, 7647 Carolina Beach Road R08518-001-014-002; R08518-001-014-001;R008518-001-014-003; R08518-001-001-000 We are proposing to build multi-family (Town-homes) with an approximate density of 7.2 Units/Acre. The New Hanover Future Land Use Map specifies this particular property to be within the Community Mixed Use with an allowable density of 12-15 units/Acre. Our proposed product falls within the lower end of the allowed uses within this Community Mixed Use. Changes to the Original Plan in consideration of the surrounding community: - Pulled the houses off of the perimeter of the site to create a larger buffer then required. - Controlling storm water with the installation SCM's to reduce/control current flooding on adjacent neighbors. - Oriented the houses to preserve some of the larger oak and pine trees. - Shifted to house arrangement to reduce the impacts to the non-regulated wetlands. - Preservation of green space and interconnectivity. - Minimal Traffic impacts: Approximated added load (from zoned to proposed) Adds ~ 150 trips per day (206 trips per day for current zoning vs. 356 trips/day with proposed. Data Provided by Davenport). This proposed Use generates one of the lowest possible within the Future Land Use maps allowed uses. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3 Page 3 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 5.Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips: 6.Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1.How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4 Page 4 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 2.How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. 3.What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5 Page 5 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as “N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist Applicant Initial This application form, completed and signed Application fee: •$600 for 5 acres or less •$700 for more than 5 acres •$300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review Community meeting written summary Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads •Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. •Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights-of-way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. •All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and buffers. •The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. •A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included. •Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities intended to serve the site. •Approximate location of regulated wetlands. •Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans X X N/A. WRN/A Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 6 Page 6 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 05-2021 7.Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1.Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2.Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3.Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and 4.Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval. Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s) Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Wesley Reynolds Type text here Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 7 I-140 Future I-140 I- 4 0 RI V E R I-140 U S H W Y 4 2 1 SIDBURY CA S T L E H A Y N E S. C O L L E G E BLU E C L A Y OLEANDER 3 R D HOLLY SHEL T E R MYRTLEGROVE EAST W O O D MLKJR. MASONBOROLOOP PIN E G R OVE PINER MI L I T A R Y C U T O F F SANDERS US HWY74/76 S HI PY A R D COL L E G E N . C O L L E G E MARKET CA R O LI N A B E A C H MARK E T Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,swisstopo, and the GIS User Community The Future Land Use Map is not legally binding like the New Hanover County Zoning Map. It is intended to be a general representation of the 25 year vision for New Hanover County, created by the citizens who were involved with Plan NHC, and will be used to guide future development decisions. PenderCounty PenderCounty BrunswickCounty P l a c e T y p e EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY MIXED USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION GROWTH NODES URBAN MIXED USE WATER FEATURES COMMERCE ZONE NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 FeetProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicLinear Unit: Foot U.S.GCS: North American 1983Datum: North American 1983Scale: 1:34,470 2 Miles ®HNCNew Hanover CountyFuture Land Use Map Plan NHC: Charting the Course Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 8 DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY MODE CHOICES DEFINITION COMMUNITY MIXED USE Street Pattern: Grid or radial Block Length: 200 - 500 ft Setbacks: Residential: Near sidewalk Non-residential: At sidewalk Pedestrian Amenities: Sidewalks, street & shade trees, street furniture, bike racks 5-12 ft Sidewalks Crosswalks Arterial & collector roads 2-4 travel lanes On and off street parking Fixed-route transit Bicycle lane / shoulder Bicycle parking DESIRED USES Moderate Density Residential Commercial Office & Institutional Mixed Use Office Retail Mixed Use Multi-family Residential Single-Family Residential Recreational Mix of UsesTypes of Uses / Projects Massing / Scale Recommendations Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations Urban Design Recommendations Use Number of Stories Ideal Density Office 1-2 Moderate Retail 1-2 Low/Moderate Mixed Use 2-3 Moderate Multi-Family Residential 2-3 Moderate (12-15 du/acre) Single-Family Residential 1-3 Moderate ( 8 du/acre)* This placetype focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve multimodal travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. These areas share several qualities with higher-intensity mixed use, including a combination of retail with office and housing above, wider sidewalks and an emphasis on streetscaping. However, these centers are generally small, no morethan a few square blocks. Civic uses,particularly recreation and public gatheringplaces are encouraged here. Lower denisitysingle family development may be acceptablewhen limitations to mixed use development exists.Ideally, large-scale, lower density commercialand industrial developments are prohibited. EXAMPLE AREAS Castle Hayne Sidbury Road Carolina Beach Road NorthChase OFFICE RETAIL HOUSING MIXED USE RECREATION Typical Zoning Categories +- Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 9 %DVLF0DS 1HZ+DQRYHU&RXQW\1&1HZ+DQRYHU&RXQW\1& =RQLQJ % &% % 6& 2 , $& , , 5$ $5 5 5 5 5 5 56 ('=' 3' 50)/ 50)0 30 PL NP 1HZ+DQRYHU&RXQW\1& 1+&*,66HUYLFHVPlanning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 10 NHC Flood Map New Hanover County, NC, New Hanover County, NC Cross Sections Addresses Elevation Certificates Limit of Moderate Wave Action Parcels Buildings FIRM Panels Flood Hazards 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD 2/14/2022, 9:49:49 PM 0 180 36090ft 0 50 10025m 1:2,000 New Hanover County, NC NHC GIS ServicesPlanning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 11 Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA | Esri Community Maps Contributors, New Hanover County, State of North Carolina DOT, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc., METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA | New Hanover County, NC COD This service contains the Conservation Overlay Districts (COD) data for New Hanover County, NC. This dataset was created by digitizing Mylar maps and USGS quads from 1973. This is ... COD COD Description Agricultural Land Barrier Island and Beach Complex Brackish Marsh Dredged Material Disposal Site Fresh Marsh Hardwood Forest Impoundments and Lagoons Longleaf Pine and Turkey Oak Woodland Maritime Shrub Thickets Mixed Pine and Hardwood Forest Natural Ponds Open Tidal Water Fresh or Brackish or Saline Pine Forest Pine Plantation Pocosin Ruderal Land Salt Marsh Savannah 600ft Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 12 Legal Description for Conditional Zoning District Petition for 7641 Carolina Beach Road BEGINNING at a new iron pipe that is in the eastern line of the U.S. Highway #421 access road, said pipe being South 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds East 30.98 feet from a point in the centerline of the pavement of the abovementioned access road; said point being South 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West along said centerline 412.0S feet from the centerline of South Seabreeze Road, (60.0 foot right of way, S.R. #153 I}; running thence from said beginning South 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds East 374.46 feet to an old iron pipe; thence South 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West 238.05 feet to an old iron pipe; thence North 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West 374.46 feet to a "X" cut on a concrete slab that is in the aforementioned eastern line; thence North 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East along said eastern access road line 238.0S feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.982 acres, more or less. The same being a portion of the Tract of Land conveyed to Lord Davis and wife, Roxanna Davis by Deed recorded in Book 409, Page 366 of the New Hanover County Registry. Legal Description for Conditional Zoning District Petition for 7645 / 7647 Carolina Beach Road TRACT 1: BEGINNING at an iron pipe in the eastern right‐of‐way line or the U.S. Highway #421 Access Road which Beginning point is located north 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds east 100 feet from an old steel in the eastern right‐of‐way line of said access road, said old steal bar being located south 84 degrees 05 minutes east 31.09 feet from a point in the center line of said access road; said point in the center line of said access road being located 891. 9 feet as measured southwardly along the center line of said access road from its intersection with the center line of Seabreeze Road (S.R. #1531); running thence from said BEGINNING Point with the eastern right‐of‐way line of said access road, north 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds east 100 teat to an iron pipe; running thence south 83 degrees 47 minutes east 677.16 feet to an iron pipe; running thence south 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds west 100 feet to an iron pipe in Chester W. Jones' line, thence with Chester W. Jones' line north 83 degrees 47 minutes west 677.16 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 1.5 acres more or less, and being the northern half of the property conveyed to Ishmond Jones, Jr. and wife, Pearl E. Jones, by deed recorded in Book 1144 at Page 0559 of the New Hanover County Registry. TRACT 2: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of a 1.5 acre tract of land owned by Chester W. Jones as described in Book 1144 at Page 0850 of the New Hanover County Registry, said BEGINNING point being in the dividing line of Tracts 6 and 7 of the R. B. Freeman lands, and running thence from said BEGINNING point, south 83 degrees 24 minutes 15 seconds east 165.48 feet to a point; thence north 06 degrees 35 minutes 45 seconds east 457.68 feet to a point in the northern line of an access easement; thence with said access easement north 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds west 204.10 feet to a point; thence south 40 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds west 321.92 feet to a point in Ishmond Jones, Jr.'s northern line; thence south 83 degrees 47 minutes east 268.68 feet to a point; thence south 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds west 200.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 2.72 acres, more or less, and being all of Lot 7 as shown on a map of survey for Nathan Wade recorded in Book 1179 at Page 1768 1/2 of the New Hanover county Registry. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 13 TOGETHER WITH an access easement tor ingress, egress and regress to the land described in Tract 2 above and being more particularly described as follows: BEING located in Federal Point Township, New Hanover County, North Carolina, and beginning at a point in the eastern right‐of‐way line of U.S. Highway 421, access road, said point being the northwestern corner of that 3 acre tract of real property conveyed to Ishmond Jones, Jr. and wife, Pearl E. Jones, by deed recorded in Book 1144 at Page 0559 of the New Hanover County Registry, and running thence from said BEGINNING point south 83 degrees 47 minutes east 408.48 feet to a point, running thence north 40 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds east 321.92 feet to a point, running thence north 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds west 38.53 feet to a point, running thence south 40 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds west 284.26 feet to a point, running thence north 83 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds west 374.46 feet to a point in the eastern right‐of‐way line or U.S. Highway 421, access road, running thence south 21 degrees 8 minutes 30 seconds west 41.36 feet to the point or BEGINNING, and being the same easement as was conveyed to Ishmond Jones, Jr. and wife, Pearl E. Jones by Deed of Easement recorded in Book 1169 at Page 1021 or the New Hanover County Registry. lshmond Jones Property Tract No. 3 Beginning at an iron pipe in the eastern right‐of‐way line of the U.S Highway 421, Access Road, said iron pipe being located South 84 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds East 31.09 feet from a point in the centerline of said Access Road, said point in the centerline of said Access Road being located 891.9 feet as measured southwardly along the centerline of said Access Road from it's intersection with the centerline of Seabreeze Road ( S R 1531), running thence from said beginning point with the eastern right‐of‐way line of said Access Road North 21 degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds East 100.00 feet to a point; running thence, South 83 degrees 47 minutes 00 seconds East 677.16 feet to point; running thence, South 2 I degrees 08 minutes 30 seconds West 100.00 feet to a point in the northern line of Tract No. 7, of the R.B. Freeman Homestead Tract; running thence, with said northern line North 83 degrees 24 minutes 15 seconds West 301.47 feet to an old iron pipe in said line; thence continuing with said line North 84 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds West 375.70 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.5 acres more or less and being a portion of Tract No. 6 of the R.B. Freeman Homestead Tract and those lands conveyed to Chester Jones as recorded in Deed Book 1144 at Page 850 as recorded in the New Hanover County Registry. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 14 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 15 NEW HANOVER COUNTY 230 Government Center Driveuite PLANNING &LAND USE Wilmington,NC 28403 910-798-7165 phone AUTHORITY FOR 910-798-7053 fax www.nhcgov.comAPPOINTMENTOFAGENT Please note that for quasi-judicial proceedings,cither the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance,special use permit,rezoning request.and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition.The Agent is hereby authorized to,on behalf of the property owner: 1.Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2.Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3.Act on the property owner?s behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Ves Leland WBA?chparsne-Sete SP c68 bucsmae |eons Gots ire 8 BE esse [EE ne 55mr (get os Oo,MIC 29ST |?Cpa,we,27514 a qet AT ?ma noldse mcL .bez Suppo RT@ COIERUITY .bart AY dade Tracking Information (Staff Only)See ireten EBONOATES Case Number Reference:Date/Time received:Received by: This document was willfully executed on the 06 dayof__Jun&,20 23 Alan,5.2: Owner |Signature Owner 2 Signature 09/14 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 16 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 17 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 18 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 19 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: 7641 & 7647 CAROLINA BEACH RD., WILMINGTON, NC SB COTTAGES INVESTMENTS, Inc. Proposed Rezoning: _____CZ-R-5___________________________________ The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zooning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice on the Sunshine List on May1, 2023. A copy of that written notice and site layout are also attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: The Community Meeting was held on May 11, 2023 at 5:30pm at Shelter #1, Veterans Park at 835 Halyburton Memorial Parkway, Wilmington, NC 28401The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached attendee sign-in sheet The following issues were discussed at the meeting: See Attached. Date: 5/31/23 Applicant: SB Cottages Investment, LLC By: Wes Reynolds – Managing Member ND:4867-9665-7254, v. 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 20 2 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 21 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 22 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 23 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 24 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 25 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 26 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 27 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 28 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 29 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 30 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 31 7641 & 7647 CAROLINA BEACH RD., WILMINGTON, NC SB COTTAGES INVESTMENTS, Inc. CONDITIONAL REZONING FROM R-15 TO R-5 Community Meeting Report Attendees: Wes Reynolds – Owner/Developer Tracy Lowe & Luke Menius – Stroud Engineering, PA Madeline Lipe – Ward and Smith, P.A. One required community meeting was held on Thursday, May 11, 2023 from 5:30 pm to 7:30 pm at the Veterans Park at 835 Halyburton Memorial Parkway in New Hanover County, North Carolina. This meeting was organized by Stroud Engineering, PA & the owner, Wes Reynolds to provide adjoining residents an opportunity to review the proposed plan, ask questions, and voice concerns regarding the proposed conditional use rezoning. The residents were notified by mail of the meeting concerning the proposed rezoning. Our client is interested in building 14 Townhomes (56 Units) on 7.37 AC. Located off U.S. 421 Carolina beach Rd., (address: 7641 Carolina Beach Road). This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. Proposed development will be owner occupied, not rental. Out of 60 adjoining property owners, 31 people attended. 19 were adjacent land owners within the 500’ radius, along with an additional 12 other land owners outside the 500’ radius. Stroud Engineering, P.A. represented two employees to address questions, obtain notes of the meeting and a required sign-in sheet, along with one representative with Ward and Smith P.A. Introduction : Introduction from Developer & Stroud Engineering, PA Developer/Owner offered info and answered questions most of the meeting All attendees were asked to sign-in, see attachment 24”x36” proposed plan & County’s Future Land Use plan presented for viewing Concept plans for unit design were available for attendees to view & discuss Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 32 TRAFFIC: Few attendees focused on traffic. Concern with existing access into and out of the site is limited. Traffic accident increase from service road to Sea Breeze Rd. onto Carolina Beach Road. Owner offered that the davenport group has already completed preliminary studies for traffic impacts. o R-15 – generates approximately 240 trips per day o R-5 - would only add approximately 136 trips per day DRAINAGE/WETLANDS/STORMWATER/WATER & SEWER AVABILITY: Concerns were also expressed regarding drainage in the area and on existing site. Attendees made comment that the existing infrastructure is inadequate to support the proposed increase in density & population. Concerns were also focused on the existing problem of water that accumulates in the lower right corner of the site. Where will the displacement flow to various surrounding properties. Concerns regarding water flowing to ditches and ICW. Owner explained that all wetlands were reviewed by SEGI and noted that 1.5 acres of the site are unregulated wetlands and theses areas are defined as “non-regulated wetlands”. The Owner also acknowledged & explained they are responsible for controlling the water on site via engineering & design. The water will be redirected to slow down the flow. Owner also noted that the ditch on the North side near Sea Breeze Road is the main ditch outfall, & that this project will have a series of small basins & common area. NOAA updated rainfall predictions within last 6 months and this is what the county follows. AQUA: Owner will likely tie into AQUA system but also has other options considering creating own WELL depending on continued discussions with the County & Aqua. Owner also noted there are performance issues with the existing pump in the area (Aqua) & noted that constructing 21 units would likely not provide adequate proceeds to cover the cost of improvements and upgrades to the water/sewer system. BUFFERS/SETBACKS/R-15/VALUES/BENEFITS & DESIGN: Concerns and comments regarding R-15 to R-5, proposed rezoning incompatible with surrounding zoning. Wishes to remain at a lower density. The new proposal will change the characteristics of the neighborhood. Some attendees worried about the decreasing property value. Rear property owners requesting a 10-foot fence for extra buffer along the rear of the property. Why is there only a 7-foot setback? Request for different layout. What is the proposed height of the building? Owner noted that the current proposal includes 56 units and the price point at this time is approximately $400-$500k, not determined at this time. Why Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 33 townhomes over single family? Owner noted that single family was not desired for this area due to noise & visibility of Carolina Beach Road. The owner explained that the setbacks shown are for R-5 and they plan to include additional buffers in accordance with County’s requirements. The owner provided and explained the 3-story units with a garage on the lower level with approximately 3,500 SF per unit. Regarding the layout of the buildings on the plan, the owner may consider a revised layout but will maintain the original desire to preserve the existing large Live Oaks. BENEFITS: Attendees expressed concern how the project will benefit the community? Owner replied: Higher density allows for buffer between Carolina Beach Road The development will manage the current status to the water Old Live Oaks will be preserved & that a tree survey has been conducted to obtain an inventory of all trees on site Community Meeting Report By: Stroud Engineering, P.A 102-D Cinema Dr. Wilmington, NC 28409 And Ward and Smith, P.A. 127 Racine Dr. Wilmington, NC 28406 For: Ken Vafier, Planning Manager - NHC Planning Re: Community Meeting – Conditional Rezoning of 7641 & 7647 Carolina Beach Rd. - SB Cottages Investments, Inc. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 34 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 35 MADELINE C. LIPE, Attorney at Law 127 Racine Drive University Corporate Center (28403) Post Office Box 7068 Wilmington, NC 28406-7068 P: 910.794.4819 F: 910.794.4877 mclipe@wardandsmith.com ASHEVILLE GREENVILLE NEW BERN RALEIGH WILMINGTON www.wardandsmith.com May 15, 2023 Community Meeting Summary Conditional Rezoning of 7641 & 7647 Carolina Beach Road SB Cottages Investment, Inc. Date, Time, and Location of Meeting: The Community Meeting was held on May 11, 2023 at 5:30pm at Shelter #1, Veterans Park at 835 Halyburton Memorial Parkway, Wilmington, NC 28401 Attendees: Wes Reynolds – Developer Tracy Lowe – Engineer at Stroud Engineering Luke Menius – Engineer at Stroud Engineering Madeline Lipe – Ward and Smith, P.A. Introduction: - Introduction of developer and Stroud Engineering - All attendees at the meeting were asked to sign-in - Proposed development is not a rental product – owner occupied - By right uses discussed - Presentation of large blow-ups of proposed site plan and excerpts from the County's Future Land Use Map - Concept plans for the unit design were also shared with attendees - Provided a brief description of the proposed 56 unit townhome development from R-15 to R-5, as well as an overview of the purpose of the meeting, the review process for conditional rezoning, and the potential for changes to the development proposal throughout the review process. - Developer encouraged interested parties to contact the Developer for more information as the rezoning review process continues. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 36 May 15, 2023 Page 2 Summary of reoccurring themes: 1. A number of attendees expressed concern regarding stormwater drainage and water displacement from the site onto surrounding property 2. Several attendees provided input regarding the County's infrastructure and made comments that the existing infrastructure is inadequate to support the proposed increase in density and population 3. Several attendees requested additional buffers between the neighboring residential community to the south and the proposed site 4. At least one attendee expressed concerns regarding increased traffic and potential for more accidents Comments/Concerns from Attendees and Responses from Developer and Design Team: *responses from the Developer and/or design team (the "Applicant") are noted below in blue - A least one attendee commented that they bought into R-15 and expected this property to remain R-15 - One attendee remarked that the proposed rezoning to R-5 is incompatible with surrounding zoning of R-15 - Several attendees expressed a desire for this area to remain at a lower density. - A number of attendees expressed concerns regarding the existing problem of water and drainage accumulating in the bottom right corner of site. These same attendees explained that they are worried about water displacement onto surrounding property. - One attendee commented that the back side of the site was designed by Army Corp. - The Applicant explained that all wetlands were reviewed by SEGI. The Applicant also noted that 1.5 acres of the site are unregulated wetlands and these areas are defined as "non-regulated wetlands". - The Applicant acknowledged and explained that it will be responsible for controlling the water on the site and that this is addressed via engineering and design. Applicant also responded that stormwater will be engineered and will direct water and slow it down. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 37 May 15, 2023 Page 3 - The Applicant noted that the current proposal includes 56 units total. o Applicant explained that under an R-15 plan the site could hold approximately 21 units. - Developer noted that there are performance issues with the existing pump in the area (Aqua). The Applicant also noted that constructing 21 units would likely not provide adequate proceeds to cover the cost of improvements and upgrades to the water/sewer system. - At least one attendee commented that the proposal would change the characteristic of the neighborhood in a negative way. - At least one attendee noted that the existing access into and out of the site is limited. - Applicant explained that it may consider creating own well depending on continued discussions with the County and/or Aqua. - Applicant Changing zoning from R-15 to R-5 o R-15 allows for 8-10 units per acre – developer proposing 7 units per acre - The Applicant offered that the Davenport group has already completed preliminary studies for traffic impacts o R-15 – generate approximately 240 trips per day o R-5 – would only add approximately 136 trips per day - At least one attendee expressed concerns regarding this project resulting in an increase in traffic accidents. - At least one attendee worried about decreasing property values - When asked, the Applicant offered that the potential price point for the units will be approximately + $400-500k, although that has not been decided definitively. o The Applicant agreed with comments from the attendees that future residents in these townhomes will hear and see Carolina Beach Road and that for this reason single family dwelling units were not as desirable in that location. - Several attendees expressed concerns regarding water going into drainage ditches and intracoastal waterway. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 38 May 15, 2023 Page 4 o The Applicant noted that the ditch on North side near Seabreeze is the main ditch outfall, and that this project will likely have series of small basins and common area. NOAA updated rainfall predictions within last six months and is what the County follows. o One attendee asked whether the Applicant will be providing water and sewer. Applicant responded that it would likely tie into Aqua system. o One attended asked how the project would benefit them. The Applicant responded by explaining the below benefits: Higher density allows for buffer between Carolina Beach road This development will manage water better that the current status Gorgeous large Oak Trees on the site which the Applicant considered while preparing the site layout. The Applicant also explained that a tree survey has already been conducted to obtain an inventory of all the trees on site. - One attendee (Snows Cut Landing HOA President Chris Mays) requested a 10' fence as a buffer between the site and the adjacent property to the south. - One attendee inquired why the setback requirement was 7'. o Applicant explained that these setbacks listed on the site plan are the setbacks for R-5 district. Applicant also explained that it will include additional buffers in accordance with the County's requirements. General Discussion following the open Q&A portion - Several attendees asked about the height and dimension of buildings. o The Applicant provided an image of the draft concept plan for the units, with 3 stories with garage on bottom floor and approximately 3,500 square foot per unit. - One attendee expressed appreciation that the proposed use is not for apartments. - At least one attendee asked what has the Developer built before. The Applicant explained that he was from Raleigh and described some of his company's previous work product. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 39 May 15, 2023 Page 5 - At least one attendee asked if the Applicant had considered a different layout. o The Applicant responded that it may consider a revised layout of the units and buildings, but that the current site plan was designed around preservation of the existing large oak trees. ND:4871-5965-0660, v. 2 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 40 1 Trip Generation Technical Memorandum Seabreeze Townhomes New Hanover County, NC Prepared for SB Cottage Investments, LLC DAVENPORT Project Number 232016 Prepared and Sealed by Donald R. Bennett, II 5/9/2023 1.0 Introduction DAVENPORT has prepared this technical memorandum to summarize the trip generation based on a proposed rezoning for parcels located at 7641, 7645 and 7647 Carolina Beach Road. The existing site is currently zoned as R-15 Residential according to the New Hanover County GIS Zoning Map. The future land use plan designates the site as a potential Community Mixed Use and General Residential Place. The proposed land use is to rezone to R-5 Residential to allow for Single Family Attached Townhomes. Based on the existing and proposed intensities, this location will not require a TIA by the NCDOT, New Hanover County, or Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) standards of 100 peak hour trips. For comparison, theoretical mixes of uses allowed in the community mixed use potential zoning have been provided. It is likely that the uses provided under the community mixed use scenario zoning would require a TIA. 2.0 Existing Conditions A desktop review of the existing roadway conditions in the study area was conducted. 2.1. Site Plan The conceptual site plan provided as Figure 1 shows the proposed 56 townhome units. Figure 2A shows the approximate location within New Hanover County. Figure 2B illustrates the site in relationship to the surrounding public roadway system. 2.2. Site Access Site access is provided via frontage directly onto SR 1575 (Service Road), which parallels US 421 south of S. Seebreeze Road. As shown in Figure 3, an unnamed right of way exists between the parcels extending into the site and providing access to two small parcels addressed to S. Seabreeze Road. SR 1575 also serves as access to approximately 50 parcels south of the subject site. Per NHC GIS, there are a few private or informal accesses that connect SR 1575 to Saltspray Lane and Roscoe Freeman Avenue. The aerials and NHC GIS indicate other unnamed accesses that pass below the Snows Cut Bridge and provide access to SR 1576 (River Road). DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 5/9/2023 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 41 Page 2 05/09/2023 Seabreeze Townhomes DAVENPORT Project No. 232016 2 2.3. Sight Distance Based on Google Street view, the site access has adequate sight distance at both the proposed site access to SR 1575 and at the service road access to SR 1531 (South Seabreeze Road). A formal evaluation of sight distance would be required of any development whether by-right or as proposed through the NCDOT driveway permitting process. The intersection of SR 1575 at S. Seabreeze Road is unsignalized. S. Seabreeze Road at US 421 is signalized (NCDOT Signal Inventory Number 03-0827). 2.4. Traffic Counts Based on NCDOT 2021 AADT mapping, US 421 is estimated to carry approximately 32,500 vehicles per day (vpd) measured just north of the Snows Cut Bridge but south of S. Seabreeze Road. US 421 has an AADT of approximately 36,000 vpd as measured approximately 1.5 miles north of S. Seabreeze Road and represents the addition of many trips from the residential subdivisions between S. Seabreeze and the sampling location. S. Seabreeze Road indicated a 2019 AADT of approximately 400 vehicles per day; however, the highest recorded AADT in the last twenty years was captured in 2017 at 480 vpd. The AADT of SR 1575 is not listed but can be estimated as 500 vpd based on the number of residential parcels accessing the roadway. A summary of the AADTs and inventory of the surrounding roadway network is provided in Figure 4. 3.0 Trip Generation (Existing and Proposed Zoning) The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 11th Edition Trip Generation Manual was used to project the weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour traffic that could be generated by the site. No internal capture, pass-by, or diverted trips are assumed. The results of the trip generation for the existing and proposed uses are shown in Table 1. Table 1 - ITE Trip Generation: Average Weekday Driveway Volumes ITE 11th Edition Land Use Size Data Source Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Existing Zoning: 210, Single-Family Detached Housing 21 Dwelling Units Adjacent- Equation 240 5 13 18 14 9 23 Proposed Zoning: 215, Single-Family Attached Housing 56 Dwelling Units Adjacent- Equation 376 6 17 23 18 12 30 Differential Expected Trips +136 +1 +4 +5 +4 +3 +7 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 42 Page 3 05/09/2023 Seabreeze Townhomes DAVENPORT Project No. 232016 3 Trip Generation, (Future Land Use Plan) While the site is not currently zoned for Community Mixed Use, parcels fronting SR 1575 are listed as such in the New Hanover Future Land Use Plan. Figure 5 provides excerpts from the Future Land Use Plan that illustrate potential uses that are typical of the Community Mixed Use zone. For comparison, trips were generated for uses that can be accommodated under that classification. Table 2 provides the potential trips from these uses. The selected uses each have a potential for over 100 trips per hour and up to over 5,000 vehicles per day under the Future Land Use Plan. Table 2 - ITE Trip Generation: Average Weekday Driveway Volumes (Future Land Use Plan) ITE 11th Edition Land Use Size Data Source Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 720 – Medical Office 100 kSF Dwelling Units Adjacent- Equation 4,189 190 51 191 121 283 404 821 – Shopping Plaza (retail) 80 kSF Dwelling Units Generator- Equation* 5,402* 219 228 447 230 136 426 720 – Medical Office + 822 Retail 40 kSF +40kSF kSF Adjacent- Equation 3,529 126 52 178 152 216 368 822 – Retail + 220 – Multifamily 40 kSF +40 DU kSF & Dwelling Units Adjacent- Equation 2,250 51 56 107 128 118 246 *Rate only provided for 24 hr. volumes 4.0 Conclusion In conclusion, this memorandum provides the estimated trip generation for multiple potential users on the site. Comparisons are provided for the existing and requested Zoning classifications. To provide a sense of scale, trips that could be generated if the site were zoned per the Future Land Use Plan were provided. Based on the estimated trip generation associated with the proposed zoning, less than 10 trips are added in each of the typical peak hours, or one additional vehicle every 6 minutes. Please let us know if you need additional information. DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 43 Page 4 05/09/2023 Seabreeze Townhomes DAVENPORT Project No. 232016 4 Supporting Documents Conceptual Site Plan – Figure 1 Site Location Map – Figure 2A Site Plan Relationship Map – Figure 2B New Hanover County Parcel Map Excerpt – Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry – Figure 4 Future Land Use Plan Information – Figure 5 Trip Generation Plots DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 44 FIGURE 1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Seabreeze Townhomes- Wilmington, NC Project Number 232016 N DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 45 FIGURE 2A SITE LOCATION MAP PROJECT NUMBER 232016 SITE INDICATOR N SITE DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 46 FIGURE 2B – Site Plan Relationship Map Seabreeze Townhomes – New Hanover County, NC Project Number 232016 N DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 47 FIGURE 3 – New Hanover County Parcel Map Excerpt Seabreeze Townhomes – New Hanover County, NC Project Number 232016 N DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 48 *** NOT TO SCALE *** N This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purposeand client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violationof the agreement between DAVENPORTand the client. FIGURE 4 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRY DAVENPORT PROJECT NAME LOCATION, NC PROJECT NUMBER 230000 2021 AADT VOLUMESXXXX BLACK = EXISTING TRAFFIC MOVEMENT ROADWAY LEGEND SIGNAL STOP SPEED LIMIT45 Se r v i c e R o a d US 4 2 1 C a r o l i n a Be a c h R o a d South Seabreeze Road River Road SPEEDLIMIT 45 32 5 ' 32 5 ' 4003,700 32 , 5 0 0 SPEED LIMIT45 SPEED LIMIT55 35 0 ' 12 5 ' US 4 2 1 C a r o l i n a Be a c h R o a d 50' 36 , 0 0 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 49 Figure 5 Seabreeze Townhomes – NHC Future Land Use Plan Details Project Number 232016 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 50 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 51 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 52 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 53 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 54 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 55 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 56 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 57 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 58 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 59 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 60 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 61 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 62 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 63 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 64 DocuSign Envelope ID: 386C94CF-3157-42FC-BA92-0FAA725FF0A6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 65 June 15, 2023 Mr. Wes Reynolds Macallan Construction, LLC Managing Member 7711 Welborn Street, Suite 103 Raleigh ,NC 27615 Re: Boles Property Water & Wastewater Utility System New Hanover County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Reynolds: Please accept this letter as Aqua North Carolina’s (“Aqua”) non-binding commitment to provide water and wastewater utility service to the planned development at Boles Property located off Carolina Beach Road in Wilmington, NC. This offer is contingent upon Aqua and the Developer entering into Water and Wastewater Utility Agreement (“Agreement”) with mutually acceptable terms, permit approvals by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, and the North Carolina Utilities Commission’s approval of this transaction. The structure of the Agreement would include the following: 1. Developer to install the water and wastewater utility system infrastructure to serve up to 50 single family units; 2. Developer to complete interconnections to Aqua’s existing water and wastewater facilities including making any necessary improvements to Aqua’s existing water and wastewater facilities in an effort to serve the proposed up to 50 single family units; 3. Developer to pay Aqua a cash contribution in aid of construction capacity (CIAC) reserve payment for the reservation of wastewater capacity in Aqua’s existing wastewater facilities at The Cape WWTF (NPDES NC0057703); 4. Developer to install a community well to support the proposed development and interconnect to Aqua’s existing water facilities: The Cape Master Water System (NCPWSID NC04651999) based on Aqua’s specifications; 5. The capacity payment amount and structure shall be detailed further in the Agreement. The Agreement will be prepared by Aqua and will contain the provisions set forth above and other traditional covenants, warranties and representations. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this project further please contact me at 919-653-6967. Sincerely, C. Ruffin Poole Director, Development & Regulatory Affairs Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 66 Concept Plan Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1 20' PERFORMANCE BUFFER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24252627282932 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 44 43 45 46 47 48 49 N/F FREEMAN WILLIAM E R08514-004-009-000 DB 6565, PG 1678 MB 16, PG 49 N/F WADE CAROLYN LOUISE R08518-001-015-000 DB 1093, PG 374 N/F BARNETT LEONARD F R08518-001-015-002 DB 1035, PG 0445 N/F ELDER FREDRICK FRANCES R08514-004-003-000 DB 3389, PG 0588 MB 42, PG 344 N/F HINNANT CORDELIA ANN R08514-004-001-000 DB6565, PG1678 MB 16, PG 49 N/F MAYS CHRIS DRU R08518-008-030-000 DB 5843, PG 0399 MB 50, PG 354 N/F KING GRADY L MARILYN N R08518-008-031-000 DB 9904, PG 2623 N/F MOORE BRAD B AUDRA S R08518-008-032-000 DB 6246, PG 1069 MB 50, PG 354 N/F MOYE CHARLES W. JR. TAMMY R08518-008-043-000 DB 5997, PG 2527 MB 50, PG 354 N/ F M U C C I A J O S E P H A J R . I R E N E M R 0 8 5 1 8 - 0 0 8 - 0 4 4 - 0 0 0 D B 6 6 2 2 , P G 2 4 9 6 M B 5 0 , P G 3 5 4 N/F HEMBREE THOMAS J R08518-008-045-000 DB 6419, PG 861 N/F FLOURNOY LAIRD BRENDA R08518-008-046-000 DB 6003, PG 2723 MB 50, PG 354 N/F TEAGUE PHILIP B R08518-008-047-000 DB 6142, PG 152 N/F TEAGUE PHILIP B R08518-008-048-000 DB 6141, PG 2457N/F SMITH CAROL MARIE R08518-001-006-000 DB 5692, PG 2830 N/F SMITH CAROL MARIE R08518-001-005-000 DB 5692, PG 2830 N/F DEW TAMMY LAND R08518-001-004-000 DB 4918, PG 1648 MB 43, PG 358 N/F LAND PATSY J R08518-001-003-000 DB 9901 PG 2321 N/F LAND PATSY R08518-001-018-000 DB 9901 PG 2321 N/F PATSY LAND R08518-001-002-000 DB 9901 PG 2321 N/F WADE LEON MORRIS R08518-001-014-004 DB 1213, PG 1469 20 ' P E R F O R M A N C E B U F F E R 20' PERFORMANCE BUFFER20' PERFORMANCE BUFFER 7' SIDE SETBACK 20 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K 20 ' P E R F O R M A N C E B U F F E R 20' PERFORMANCE BUFFER 20' PERFORMANCE BUFFER 20' P E R F O R M A N C E S E T B A C K 50 3031 42 20 ' F R O N T S E T B A C K AE 10 BFE FLOODPLAIN 1 1 LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE: 0 JHF TLL JHF 2/1/23 1" = 50' 50 50 100 1" = 50' SEA BREEZE General Notes: 1.Property Address given to be: 7641, 7645 & 7647 Carolina Beach Road. 2.Property area is 7.37 Acres. 3.Wetlands shown are determined to be isolated and unregulated. 4.Property does not lie within a Flood Hazard Area. 5.Proposed use has estimated daily traffic as follows: 376 Daily trips, 18 in, 12 out Peak Hour PM trips. 6.Water and Sewer service will be provided by Aqua. 7.Power supply will be by Duke Progress. 8.Buffers shall comply with New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1 Public Comments In Support 0 Neutral 0 In Opposition 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 10 - 1 Farrell, Robert From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Thursday, June 22, 2023 9:56 PM To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject:Online Form Submission #4095 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name Wendy Last Name Giannini-King Address 343 Wild Rice Way City Wilmington State NC Zip Code 28412 Email Wgianniniking@live.com Projects available for comment. PB Meeting - Z23-14 - 7641, 7645, 7647 Carolina Beach Road What is the nature of your comment? Oppose project Public Comment Overwhelmed schools. Overwhelmed roadways. NO MORE HOUSING UNITS. The historical significance of SeaBreeze must be honored, and this proposed housing development doesn't reflect the Black culture that signifies this special area. Please leave this area natural...or create a park! I 100% DO NOT SUPPORT the development of these parcels. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 10 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/6/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Zach Dickerson, Current Planner CONTACT(S): Zach Dickerson; Robert Farrell, Senior Planner; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solu6ons, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, Residen6al to (CZD) R-5, Residen6al for a maximum of 7 single-family residen6al lots. BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 0.92 acres from the R-15, Residen,al zoning district to the (CZD) R-5, Residen,al district for a maximum 7 unit detached single-family development. The concept plan consists of 7 detached single-family dwellings on 7 lots. The concept plan also includes open space behind the 7 lots which will also be used for stormwater management. Where the site abuts N College Road, the concept plan includes a 20' wide common area that is set aside for possible future right-of-way acquisi,on by NCDOT- this is included as a condi,on. The applicant has also included as a condi,on that no Accessory Dwelling Units will be permi8ed on these lots. The applicant has provided condi,ons that no trees in the open space will be removed except for those required for stormwater management, and that there will be shared access driveways for 6 of the lots to limit driveway cuts. The R-15 district in this area was established in 1972. At the ,me, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure housing served by private sep,c and wells would be developed at low densi,es. Since that ,me, public water and sewer services have become available to the surrounding area. The R-5 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density single-family detached and single-family a8ached development on smaller lots. The district allows a range of housing types and can serve as a transi,on between mixed-use or commercial development and low to moderate density residen,al development. As currently zoned, the site would permit 4 dwelling units on the 4 pla8ed lots. The proposed 7 units would result in an overall density of 7 units per acre. It is es,mated the site would generate 3 AM and 4 PM peak hour trips as currently zoned. The proposed R-5 development is es,mated to generate 5 AM and 7 PM peak hour trips, increasing the es,mated number of peak hour trips by approximately 2 AM and 3 PM trips. The proposed project's peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold required a Traffic Impact Analysis, but NCDOT will review the project through the driveway permi@ng process. The proposed project is located along a major arterial highway that is currently over capacity; however, the N College Road improvements are expected to improve traffic condi,ons in this area in the next several years. Based on preliminary designs, the future improvements to N College Road and Shelley Drive will restrict access to these proper,es. NCDOT has stated that future access would be accommodated through the roadway design process that Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 may reduce the poten,al for traffic conflicts, but this design has not yet been finalized. Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Blair Elementary School, Trask Middle School, and New Hanover High School. Based on a generalized historic genera,on rate, staff would es,mate the increase in homes would result in approximately 1 more student that the es,mated number of students generated under exis,ng zoning. Most of the surrounding development is residen,al, however there is a convenience store across Shelley Drive from these parcels. This area of Kings Grant serves as an entrance to the neighborhood, transi,oning from the more heavily driven N College Road to slower neighborhood roads. The Comprehensive Plan designates these proper,es as General Residen,al, a place type that focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. The General Residen,al place type recommends housing densi,es up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed rezoning request is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project is in line with the density and housing type recommenda,ons for the General Residen,al place type. The project would provide a transi,on between the high-intensity roadway corridor and the exis,ng low-density neighborhood. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff’s recommenda,on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera,ons and technical review. While the proposal is in line with the density recommended by the place type, and the project would provide slightly more housing than is currently zoned, planned NCDOT improvements are expected to impact exis,ng and future development in this corridor. The proposed R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residen,al Place type, and the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residen,al uses, transi,oning from a high traffic corridor into a lower-density neighborhood. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following mo,on: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residen,al place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residen,al uses, transi,oning from a high traffic corridor into a lower-density neighborhood. Proposed Condi6ons: 1. No accessory dwelling units will be permi8ed on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisi,on by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be shared driveways across lots 2 & 3, lots 4 & 5, and lots 6 & 7 with access easements over the shared driveway space. Alterna6ve Mo6on for Denial (if, based on informa,on provided at the public hearing or other considera,on beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds recommending denial appropriate) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residen,al place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing poten,al safety concerns for vehicles exi,ng the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impac,ng future residents of the proposed homes. ATTACHMENTS: Descrip,on Z23-13 Shelley Drive Script PB Z23-13 Shelley Drive Staff Report PB Z23-13 Zoning Map Z23-13 Future Land Use Map Z23-13 Mailout Map Initial Application Cover Sheet Z23-13 Application Concept Plan Cover Sheet Z23-13 Concept Plan Public Comments Cover Sheet COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z23-13) Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, Residential to (CZD) R-5, Residential for a maximum of 7 single-family residential lots. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower-density neighborhood. Proposed Conditions 1. No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be shared driveways across lots 2 & 3, lots 4 & 5, and lots 6 & 7 with access easements over the shared driveway space. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 Example Motion for Denial I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing potential safety concerns for vehicles exiting the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impacting future residents of the proposed homes. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a conditional RMF-M district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 1 of 17 STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-13 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z23-13 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional R-5 district Applicant: Property Owner(s): Whit Beebe, Rolina Homes NC, LLC Rolina Homes, NC LLC Location: Acreage: 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive 0.92 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R04216-020-005-000, R04216-020-004-000, R04216-020-003-000, R04216-020-002-000 General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped 7 Single-Family Detached Dwellings Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-15 (CZD) R-5 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single-Family Residential R-15 East Single Family Residential R-15 South BP Gas Station and Convenience Store B-2 West N College Road & Single-Family Residential R-10 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 1 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 2 of 17 ZONING HISTORY July 1, 1972 Initially zoned R-15, area 9A COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sanitary sewer services are available through CFPUA. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Murrayville Station Schools Blair Elementary, Trask Middle, and New Hanover High Schools Recreation Kings Grant Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 2 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 3 of 17 APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Includes Staff Markups • The applicant is proposing to construct seven single-family detached housing units on seven lots. • Under the proposed (CZD) R-5 zoning district, the applicant has proposed a condition that no Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are allowed. • The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes 8,050 sq ft of open space to the north of the lots to be used for open space and stormwater management. • The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes a 20’ common area to the west of the lots that will be set aside for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway projects. • The applicant has agreed to a condition to preserve all trees in the open space except those necessary for removal for stormwater. • The applicant has also agreed to a condition that there will be shared driveways for lots 2 & 3, lots 4 & 5, and lots 6 & 7 with access easements over the shared space. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 3 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 4 of 17 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 district in this area was established in 1972. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. Since that time, water and sewer services have become available. • While the site is zoned R-15, the N. College Road corridor is a heavily traveled roadway. There is some commercial development nearby, namely the fuel stations to the south. • As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed four single-family dwellings- one on each of the four existing lots. • Both the R-15 and R-5 zones permit ADUs by-right. However, the applicant’s proposed condition restricts development to one house per lot. • Conventional Residential Subdivisions require 10% of the total area to be set aside as open space. Performance Residential Subdivisions require 20% of the total area as open space. The total area of this development, at 40,035 square feet, would require 4,004 sq ft of open space in a Conventional Residential Subdivision, and 8,008 sq ft of open space in a Performance Residential Subdivision. The applicant’s concept plan includes 18,050 sq ft of open space, exceeding this requirement. • The R-5 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density single-family detached and single-family attached development. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 4 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 5 of 17 AREA DEVELOPMENTS Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 5 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 6 of 17 TRANSPORTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning would allow a maximum of 4 single-family dwelling units. PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access Shelley Drive via full-access driveways. Secondary Access N/A EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway N College Shelley Drive Type of Roadway NCDOT Principle Arterial Local Road Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 41,369 10,979 Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 48,500 N/A Latest WMPO Point-in-Time County (DT) 41,231 N/A Current Level of Congestion Over Capacity N/A Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 6 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 7 of 17 NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADWAY PROJECTS U-5881 – College Road (NC 132) Improvements - Improvements to College Road from Gordon Road to New Centre Drive. - May include additional lanes, possible interchanges at Kings Drive and Ringo Street and minor modifications of the College Road/Market Street interchange. - This project will close the intersection of Shelley Drive and N College Road. Traffic will be routed further east on Shelley Drive, to travel north on Kings Grant Dr to access N College Road. - 2025-2028 ROW acquisition and bidding. U-4902B – US 17 Business (Market St) - Project encompasses access management improvements on US 17 Bus. Between CSX Railroad to Cinema Drive and Jacksonville Street to north of US 117/NC 132 (College Rd). - Right-of-Way is in progress. U-4902C – US 17 Business (Market St) - Project encompasses access management improvements on US 17 Bus. From US 117/NC 132 (College Road) to Station Road. - Right-of-Way is in progress. U-6202 (Gordon Road) - Widening of Gordon Road from I-40 to US 17 Bus. (Market St). - Anticipated start date of Summer 2024. TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic Generated by Present Designation Traffic Generated by Proposed Designation Potential Impact of Proposed Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 3 5 +2 PM Peak Hour Trips 4 7 +3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 7 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 8 of 17 SUMMARY The proposed project is located along a major arterial highway that is currently over capacity; however, the N College Road improvements are expected to improve traffic conditions in this area in the next several. years. Based on preliminary designs, the future improvements to N College Road and Shelley Drive will restrict access to these properties. NCDOT has stated that future access would be accommodated through the roadway design process that may reduce the potential for traffic conflicts, but this design has not yet been finalized. The proposed project’s peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold requiring a traffic impact analysis, but NCDOT will review the project through the driveway permitting process. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 8 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 9 of 17 ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area. The property is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Smith Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) & III (severe limitation) soils. However, the site is expected to be served by CFPUA when developed. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools • Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Blair Elementary School, Trask Middle School, and New Hanover High School. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools. • A maximum of 4 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base density, and 7 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 3 dwelling units. • Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in approximately 1 additional student than would be generated under current zoning. • The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students. Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the most recent New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study. Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield (current general student generation rate) * Existing Development Undeveloped Approximate** Total: 0 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Typical Development Under Current Zoning 4 residential units Approximate** Total: 1 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Proposed Zoning 7 residential units Approximate** Total: 2 (1 elementary, 0 middle, 1 high) *The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out- of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 9 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 10 of 17 **Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the approximate total. • Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades. School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year) *Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year. **Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time. • The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data, planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded. Level Total NHC Capacity School Enrollment of Assigned School Capacity of Assigned School w/Portables Capacity of Assigned School Funded or Planned Capacity Upgrades Elementary 91% Blair 421 525 80% None Middle 92% Trask 672 655 103% None High 98.5% New Hanover 1467 1678 87.4% None Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 10 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 11 of 17 New Hanover County Strategic Plan • One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services. • The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 89%. Under the proposed R-5 district the site would allow for single family detached homes. Due to the number of units proposed, single family detached would remain at 89%. • The subject property is located in the Gateway community area, where 40% of residents currently live within one-mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples, pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor’s office, child & adult care, etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.). Under the proposed R-5 district and the number of units proposed, there would be no change to the number of residences within one-mile of goods and services. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 11 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 12 of 17 Representative Developments Representative Developments of R-15 (Existing Zoning): Cottage Grove Clay Crossing Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 12 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 13 of 17 Representative Developments of R-5 (Proposed Zoning): R-5 in the City of Wilmington Smith Creek Village on New Centre Drive near Kerr Avenue Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 13 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 14 of 17 Context and Compatibility • The properties are located at an entrance to the Kings Grant subdivision at the intersection of Shelley Drive and N College Road. • The majority of the Kings Grant neighborhood is zoned for low-density residential. • While most of the surrounding area is residential, the properties lie across Shelley Drive from a fuel station and convenience store. • As the concept plan notes, NCDOT plans to make improvements to the N College Road corridor with a 2025-2028 ROW acquisition and bidding date, focusing on the section between New Centre Drive and Gordon Road. The applicant has set aside common space for possible future NCDOT right of way acquisition. • NCDOT’s plan includes a right turn off N College Road which will result in the removal of the fuel station and convenience store to the south of these parcels, and which will likely restrict access to these parcels. • This roadway project has been incorporated with STIP project U-5792 and is in the design phases. Project design includes elevation of N College over Ringo Drive, Martin Luther King Jr Parkway and Kings Grant. • This project will restrict the Shelley Drive access at N College Road. NCDOT indicated that a small stem of Shelley may be created to accommodate access to the parcels, but this would come later in design and right-of-way plan preparation. • While transitions from commercial to progressively lower housing densities is preferred, the funded NCDOT project is anticipated to acquire additional right-of-way that will eliminate some of these transitions and place the highway in closer proximity to existing residential uses. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 14 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 15 of 17 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Future Land Use Map Place Type General Residential Place Type Description Focuses on lower-density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single-family residential, low-density multi-family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreation. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 15 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 16 of 17 Analysis The subject properties are located along Shelley Drive at its intersection with N College Road, a heavily traveled roadway. Most of the surrounding development is residential, however there is a convenience store across Shelley Drive from these parcels. This area of Kings Grant serves as an entrance to the neighborhood, transitioning from the more heavily driven N College Road to slower neighborhood roads. The Comprehensive Plan classifies the properties as General Residential, which promotes lower-density, single family uses and light commercial. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a maximum density of 8 units per acre in the General Residential place type. The applicant is proposing 7 houses on 7 parcels, for an overall density of approximately 7 units per acre. The proposed use is in line with the Comprehensive Plan’s recommendations for the General Residential Place type. While the surrounding Kings Grant neighborhood remains zoned for low-density residential, the location of these parcels is adjacent to the high- traffic N College Road corridor; the higher-density housing proposal could help serve as a transition from high-traffic to low-density housing. Future access to these parcels may be complicated by NCDOT planned improvements. Consistency Recommendation The proposed (CZD) R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project is in line with the density and housing type recommendations for the General Residential place type. The project would provide a transition between the high-intensity roadway corridor and the existing low-density neighborhood. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 16 Z23-13 Staff Report PB 7.6.2023 Page 17 of 17 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations and technical review. While the proposal is in line with the density recommended by the place type, and the project would provide slightly more housing than is currently zoned, planned NCDOT improvements are expected to impact existing and future development in this corridor. The proposed R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential Place type, and the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower-density neighborhood. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower-density neighborhood. Proposed Conditions 1. No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be shared driveways across lots 2 & 3, lots 4 & 5, and lots 6 & 7 with access easements over the shared driveway space. Alternative Motion for Denial (if, based on information provided at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds recommending denial appropriate) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing potential safety concerns for vehicles exiting the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impacting future residents of the proposed homes. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 2 - 17 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 3 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 4 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 5 - 1 Initial Application Documents & Materials Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 6 - 1 Page 1 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Public Hearing Procedures (Optional) Pre-Application Conference 1 Community Information Meeting 2 Application Submittal & Acceptance 3 Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional) 4 Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification 5 Planning Board Hearing & Recom-mendation 6 Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision 7 Post-Decision Limitations and Actions 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) Company Company/Owner Name 2 Address Address City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Phone Phone Email Email Design Solutions Cindee Wolf P.O. Box 7221 Wilmington, NC 28406 910-620-2374 cwolf@lobodemar.biz Rolina Homes NC, L.L.C. 501 Bramson Court Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 804-516-6290 (Contact: Whit Beebe) whitbeebe@rolinahomes.com Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 1 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive 314805.18.6331, 7239, 8229 & 9238 R-15 General Residential CZD / R-5 0.92 ac. 40,035 s.f. (0.92 ac.) Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 2 Page 3 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips: 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. Single-family Homes (210) per Dwelling Unit (7) 5 7 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 3 Page 4 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 4 Page 5 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 02-2022 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as “N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist Applicant Initial This application form, completed and signed Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review Community meeting written summary Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda. Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights-of-way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans CAW CAW CAW N/A CAW CAW CAW CAW Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 5 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 6 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 7 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 8 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 9 Legal DescripƟon for CondiƟonal Zoning District 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive Beginning at a point in the eastern boundary of North College Road (N.C. Highway 132), a 200’ public right-of-way; said point being at the intersecƟon with the northern boundary of Shelley Drive (S.R. 2009), a 60’ public right-of-way; and running thence with the N. College Road right- of-way: North 10016’35” East, 129.89 feet to a point; thence leaving the right-of-way, South 80009’34” East, 28.42 feet to a point; thence South 79032’27” East, 71.58 feet to a point; thence South 79042’52” East, 99.97 feet to a point; thence South 79043’08” East, 102.03 feet to a point; thence South 83022’45” East, 95.00 feet to a point; thence South 06004’15” West, 148.24 feet to a point in the northern boundary of Shelley Drive; thence with that right-of-way, Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 1214.85 feet and Length of 141.49 feet, a Chord of North 83003’13” West, 141.41 feet to a point; thence North 79043’00” West, 246.50 feet to a point; thence Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 20.00 feet and Length of 31.52 feet, a Chord of North 34031’53” West, 28.35 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 60,240 square feet, or 1.38 acres, more or less. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 10 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Rolina Homes / 4501, 4505, 4509 & 4513 Shelley Drive Proposed Zoning: R-15 to (CZD) R-5 (1.38 ac.) The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on May 18, 2023 . A copy of that written notice and site layout are also attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, May 30th, 6:00 p.m.; at Picnic Shelter #3, Long Leaf Park. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign-in list The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief presentation was given on the intent of the developer to construct seven (7) new 2-story, single-family homes. The process of rezoning was explained with the dates provided for the expected Planning Board and Commissioners public hearings. Conversation included future changes in traffic circulation due to the NCDOT project at the MLK Blvd. / N College Rd. intersection, architectural style, estimated onset of construction, and noise or other impacts during construction. Additional contact was made the following morning, and addressed in a return email (attached). Date: May 31, 2023 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 11 Moench / Stauble 4817 Lord Nance Dr deirdre.moench@gmail.com Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 12 From:cwolf@lobodemar.biz To:"Deirdre Moench" Cc:"whitbeebe rolinahomes.com" Subject:RE: Design Solution inquiry Date:Wednesday, May 31, 2023 9:20:00 AM Attachments:NCDOT Proj.pdfArch-Style.pdfCZD Plan May30.pdf Sorry for the email delivery error. I have received your message. One of the differences in this land as compared to yours on a cul-de-sac is that the property across the street is zoned and used for commercial purposes. This parcel's location closer to the busy highway is certainly reasonable justification for a "transitional" use - but this Owner is not trying to yield an attached housing or non-residential use. The builder will need to adjust his marketing to offset those impacts, but based on the region's well-publicized deficit of homes for the influx of new residents, we believe that the project is a good one, and will be successful. Although the future NCDOT project is still several years to come, we have adjusted our layout to address the probability of land acquisition for widening. The intersection of Shelley Drive with N College Road will eventually be closed, in exchange for access from extension of the "service road" that currently ends at the Church. The additional trip generation between the four existing home lots and the proposed seven lots, is negligible to the overall traffic. Shelley Drive has adequate design capacity. This project will be required to provide stormwater management to meet current regulations by both the State and County - something that the older Kings Grant community does not have. Although the proposed architecture for the project is not the more traditional ranch-style of Kings Grant, again I cite the adjacency to the C-store, boarded-up retail building and 2-story office building. As to any impact on surrounding property values, new building in an older neighborhood typically enhances the values of the neighborhood not only with upgrade of aesthetics, by providing higher comparable appraisals with current market pricing. The process began with the community information effort. We intend to submit the rezoning petition to the County tomorrow, June 1st. You will receive a notice directly from the County around the 3rd week of June that there is a public hearing by the Planning Board on Thursday, July 6th. That is the opportunity for anyone to come out and speak in support, or opposition, to the proposal. That Board provides a recommendation to the Commissioners who will have the ultimate vote on approval or denial on Monday, August 7th. You will also receive notice of the meeting, and is the final public hearing for you to voice your sentiment. I have added your contact and comments to the "Report of Public Meeting" that will be included with the submittal. I have included some additional exhibits about the project. Please do not hesitate to reach out again if you have more questions. Thank you. Cindee Wolf -----Original Message----- From: Deirdre Moench <deirdre.moench@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 7:07 PM To: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Subject: Design Solution inquiry Dear Cindee Wolf, My husband and I own a home within 500 feet of the new build you are proposing in Kings Grant. As a Home Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 13 owner in this space I am concerned predominantly with safety. Shelly Drive is a busy road, as it comes off N College road into our neighborhood. Incorporating 7 homes in this very small space against the highway and it’s traffic seems profoundly dangerous for those of us who travel this way in and out of the neighborhood. What do youplan to do to avoid accidents? What precautions are you thinking about to ensure the people of this community aresafe? Another issue that the people who purchase these 7 homes will face are profound traffic noise. Do you have anyintent to help buffer them from that noise? The lack of wooded land also adds considerable noise to our street. Whatdo you plan to do to help with that? Aesthetically, the homes you’re proposing do not fit the neighborhood. Is it possible to adjust the number of homes,if you’re determined to build, to make them match the neighborhood? Our community is unique to this city and weare concerned about the damage this quick, dangerous build will bring to our nice quiet home. Finally, what can we do to leave this small parcel of land as is to help absorb water due the increased need for greenspace in Wilmington. I’m sure you’re aware that hurricane flooding is a serious concern, and while we are not in aflood space, it is necessary to maintain as much land, without pavement, to absorb water. What are your concerns inregard to this topic? Your initial note says there are benefits and improvements that this build will bring to our neighborhood. What arethose? Additionally, what impacts do you foresee? Also, who can we contact with the county to discourage allowing you to move forward with this building proposal? Thank you for your time to answer our questions. Deirdre Moench & Zack Stauble Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 14 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 15 500' PERIMETER FROM 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 SHELLEY DRIVE: SUBJECT PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP ROLINA HOMES NC LLC 501 BRAMSON CT MOUNT PLEASANT SC 29464 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 4810 GREENWAY LLC PO BOX 12307 WILMINGTON NC 28405 BANISTER WILLIAM KSANDRA D 1014 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 BARTELS JEFFREY F LORI R 4813 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 BIGHAM JAMES A BARBARA J 145 GREENCREST CIR JACKSONVILLE NC 28540 BLACKBURN KYLE ALEXANDER 1006 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 BRAND CAROLYN N 4818 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 BRUNNER RAYMOND C MICHELLE 910 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 CAVENAUGH THOMAS JR JANICE 821 RIVAGE PROMENADE WILMINGTON NC 28412 CLARK STORES LLC PO BOX 469 CLINTON NC 28329 COSTIN BEVERLY C JR ANITA D 4814 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 DEVAUGHN CONSTANCE W 905 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 DIAKO CONSTRUCTION INC PO BOX 51965 DURHAM NC 27717 ENGLISH LISA 4821 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 FYLSTRA JONATHAN D LAURA K 1106 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 GRIFFIN M TAYLOR 4801 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 HANSEN DANIEL M AUDREY D 909 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 HOWARD BARRY E KIMBERLY H 914 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 HUFFER JASON E JANICE E 1480 KEISER RD WAVERLY OH 45690 JOHNSON MATTHEW ASHLEY 4825 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 KREPPS DANIEL L WENDY TALLEY 4810 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 LOCKLEAR LOGAN 905 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 LONG TIMOTHY S ROBIN C 4809 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 MARTENS JOHN W RU YAN 4806 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 MATZKE ERIC J JR PATRICIA A ETAL 4802 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 MCMANUS MICHAEL ETAL 10711 EDMUNDSON AVE RALEIGH NC 27614 MILLARD DAVID K BILLIE J 712 DUCK DOWNE CT WILMINGTON NC 28409 MOLINA BRIAN 1006 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 MORALES LUIS A 4649 NORWICH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 PARKER JOYCE STEPHENSON 1010 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 PIRANEO RYAN C 4822 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 ROBBINS DONNA 1002 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 RODRIGUEZ MELISSA 4802 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 RUSSO CASEY 2723 CHESHIRE DR BALDWIN NY 11510 SALAS ISMAEL GLADYS BEJAR 906 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SANCHEZ ROSA R 4657 NORWICH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SHELLEY CO LLC THE 4810 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 SIERRA PEREZ ARLENE 1102 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SMITH JOANN 4818 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 SMITH WM LINDA FLYNN TRUSTEES 4814 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 STAUBLE ZACHARY A 4817 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 STRICKLAND BILLY M PO BOX 189 CAROLINA BEACH NC 28428 SULLIVAN LLOYD JACQUELINE 901 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SWINSON DOCK E MARJORIE 4821 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 VAGNERINI PAUL BEVERLY 554 GRANDE MANOR CT #208 WILMINGTON NC 28405 WISE AMY LEE 917 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 16 P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Notice of Community Information Meeting May 18, 2023 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive My Client is pursuing permitting to build seven (7) new homes on land at the referenced addresses. A sketch plan of the proposed layout and improvements is attached. Your property is located within the proximity of the proposed project. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only a specific use, in this case construction of seven (7) single-family homes and proposed property improvements for driveways and parking, can be developed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within five-hundred feet (500’) of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. An information meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 30th, 6:00 p.m., at Picnic Shelter #3, Long Leaf Park (north side of the park accessed from Pine Grove Road). If you’re not able to attend, you can also contact me at Tel. # 910-620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz, with comments and/or questions. We appreciate your interest and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 17 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 18 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 19 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 20 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 21 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 7 - 22 Concept Plan Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 8 - 1 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 9 - 1 Public Comments In Support 0 Neutral 0 In Opposition 0 Planning Board - July 6, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 10 - 1