HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ23-24 Planning Board Staff ReportZ23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 1 of 15
STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-24
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z23-24
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional R-7 district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf, Design Solutions Sandra E McKeithan
Location: Acreage:
1132 Seabreeze Rd 0.444
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R08519-001-002-000 Community Mixed Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped Residential (2 lots)
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
B-2, Regional Business (CZD) R-7, Residential District
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Detached Single-Family Residential, built in 1930
(predates zoning) B-2
East Intracoastal Waterway N/A
South Bed and Breakfast B-2
West Boat and Boat Trailer Storage B-2
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 2 of 15
ZONING HISTORY
April 7, 1971 Initially zoned B-2 (Area 4)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer
Neither water nor sewer services are available through CFPUA. The AQUA
system does serve part of Seabreeze Road, but this property would only
be serviceable via a mainline extension. The property could be served
through private well and septic permitted through NHC Environmental
Health.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire
District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station
Schools Anderson Elementary, Murray Middle, and Ashley High Schools
Recreation Veterans Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
No known conservation resources on-site. However, there are open tidal
waters just outside the eastern property boundary which prescribe a 75’
Conservation Overlay District setback on the site.
Historic
While undeveloped, the parcel is located within the historic Seabreeze
neighborhood. Established in the mid-1920’s, the area was a prime vacation
resort for African Americans within southeastern North Carolina from the
1930’s through the 1950’s before a decline stemming from Hurricane Hazel
in 1954, financial trouble, and the end of segregation in the 1960’s.
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 3 of 15
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Applicant’s Concept Plan - Includes Staff Markups
• The applicant is proposing to subdivide and build two single-family homes on these two lots.
• Under the proposed R-7 zoning district, lots must be a minimum of 7,000 sq ft in area and
be a minimum of 50’ wide.
• The applicant’s proposed conceptual plan includes two lots which meet the prescribed R-7
and COD setbacks.
In
t
r
a
c
o
a
s
t
a
l
Wa
t
e
r
w
a
y
S
S
e
a
b
r
e
e
z
e
R
d
75’ COD
Setback Line
Lot 2
Lot 1
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 4 of 15
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The B-2 district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the B-2
district was to encourage business development in the historic Seabreeze area. Since that
time, private water and sewer services have become available to the surrounding area
through AQUA. However, that service line does not extend to this property.
• While the site is zoned B-2, the acreage of the site limits its availability to be easily
developed for a B-2 use.
• Additionally, residential properties are not required to install buffers where they abut
commercial properties.
• As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed a small-scale commercial operation
based on size of parcel and requisite development standards for commercial uses. A small
B-2 parcel like this could be conducive to a restaurant, bar or event center.
• The R-7 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate density
residential development with a range of housing types (and income levels, including quality
affordable housing), that are located walkable distances to jobs, shopping, and
entertainment, and where appropriate, serve as a transition between more intensive and
lower density areas. Residential development at the scale allowed in the district should
support the efficient delivery of public services and increase residents’ accessibility to
employment, public transportation and shopping.
• The property was granted a variance in 2015, ZBA-902, for a proposed commercial
development. The development did not materialize, and if the rezoning is approved, the
variance would not be needed due to the setbacks required by the R-7 district.
• There is a significant live oak and a specimen live oak on the property. As currently zoned,
a tree removal permit would be required for removal of the significant tree and a variance
would be required for removal of the specimen. If rezoned and subdivided into residential
lots less than one acre, the trees could be removed without a tree removal permit. Staff
recommends a condition requiring retention of trees on-site if the rezoning is approved.
• UDO Section 5.4.3 prescribes transitional buffers where commercial uses abut residential
uses. There is an existing commercial use of a bed and breakfast on the parcel to the south.
When residential uses are established adjacent existing commercial establishments, these
buffers are not required.
• If approved, the project would be subject to zoning compliance review processes to ensure
full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the
approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the
UDO, would be allowed.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 5 of 15
AREA DEVELOPMENTS
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 6 of 15
TRANSPORTATION
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 7 of 15
CURRENT CONDITIONS
Intensity of Current Zoning
Typical development under current zoning would allow
an approximate maximum 3,700 sq ft commercial
establishment.
PROPOSED ACCESS
Primary Access S Seabreeze Rd
EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Affected Roadway S Seabreeze Rd
Type of Roadway Local Road
Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 4,000*
Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 400
Latest WMPO Point-in-Time County (DT) N/A
Current Level of Congestion Available Capacity
NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADWAY PROJECTS
No Nearby STIP Projects
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic
Generated by
Present
Designation
Traffic Generated
by Proposed
Designation
Potential
Impact of
Proposed
Designation
AM Peak Hour Trips 8 1 -2
PM Peak Hour Trips 22 2 -20
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)
The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the
ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
SUMMARY
The proposed project is located along a local road that currently has capacity. Seabreeze Road is
currently accessed off of Carolina Beach Road, a principal arterial highway which is heavily traveled
but with available capacity. Though there are no STIP projects in this area, this development wo uld
result in an overall trip reduction from what could be developed with the existing zoning. This project
would have very little traffic impact on the surrounding area.
*Seabreeze Road does not have a listed planning capacity. The WMPO and NCDOT use a base
4,000 vehicles per day for those road types because it is the minimum threshold necessary for
NCDOT to discuss roadway capacity improvements.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 8 of 15
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area.
• The property is wholly within the VE Coastal High Hazard Area, which would require
elevation certificates and additional development standards as prescribed in the UDO.
• Per UDO Section 3.1.3.D.2.b.2, no areas designated as AE or VE special flood hazard
areas shall have a residential density that exceeds 2.5 units per acre. This proposal’s density
is 4.2 units per acre.
• The property is not noted within the watersheds layer in New Hanover County GIS.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class I (Suitable) soils.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Schools
• Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary
School, Murray Middle School, and Ashley High School. Students may apply to attend
public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools.
• A maximum of 0 dwelling units would be permitted under the current B-2 zoning base
density, and 2 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an
increase of 2 dwelling units.
• Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in
homes would result in approximately 0 additional students than would be generated under
current zoning.
• The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield
as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students.
• Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated
by new development. Between the 2020-2021 school year and the 2023-2024 school
year, total student population decreased by approximately 300 students, while over
11,000 new residential units were constructed.
• The county uses the most current New Hanover County Schools Facilities Needs Study in its
analysis and it currently shows the student population is anticipated to only grow by
approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years. However, a more recent New
Hanover County School Facility Utilization Study presented to the School Board in
September 2023 indicates only approximately 400 more students by the 2032-2033
school year, though numbers are anticipated to be higher during certain school years over
the next ten years. This updated study has not been fully reviewed by Planning staff or
presented to the Board of Commissioners. That is expected to occur in early 2024.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 9 of 15
Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield
(current general student generation rate) *
Existing Development Undeveloped Approximate** Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
Typical Development Under
Current Zoning 0 residential units Approximate** Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
Proposed Zoning 2 residential units Approximate** Total: 0
(0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high)
*The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student
enrollment for the 2023-2024 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an
average of 0.21 public school students (0.10 for elementary, 0.04 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per
dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out -
of-district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech.
**Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields
with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are
rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the
approximate total.
• Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the
potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity
upgrades.
School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2023-2024 School Year)
*Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2023-2024 school year.
**Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2023-2024 school year, and funded or
planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools
to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may
be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time.
• The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC
Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data,
planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result
in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded.
• The more recent New Hanover County Schools School Facility Utilization Study has been
prepared and was presented to the School Board in September 2023, and it identifies
updated capacity upgrade projects that will be presented to the Board of Commissioners
at the planned work session in early 2024.
Level
Total
NHC
Capacity
School
Enrollment of
Assigned
School
Capacity of
Assigned
School
w/Portables
Capacity of
Assigned
School
Funded or
Planned
Capacity
Upgrades
Elementary 90% Anderson 603 569 106% None
Middle 88% Murray 896 889 101% None
High 100% Ashley 1910 1900 100.5% None
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 10 of 15
New Hanover County Strategic Plan
On July 17, 2023 the Board of Commissioners adopted a new strategic plan for Fiscal Years 2024-
2028. This plan focuses on three core areas: workforce and economic development, community
safety and well-being, and sustainable land use and environmental stewardship.
Strategic Plan Outcomes Relevant to
Proposal Analysis
Through planned growth and development,
residents have access to their basic needs.
The strategic objective to achieve this desired
outcome includes the provision of a variety of
housing options. The proposed CZD R-7 rezoning
will provide new single-family homes in an area of
the county that is largely single-family, detached
and can aid in achieving the target of increasing
the housing supply to a level of one residential unit
per every two residents.
Natural Areas and Critical Environmental
Features are Enhanced and Protected
Reduce the number of new residential lots created
in special flood hazard areas within the
unincorporated county. This proposed rezoning
would create two new residential lots in the
special flood hazard area.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 11 of 15
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of B-2 (Existing Zoning):
Small-Scale Commercial Development
Representative Residential Developments of Seabreeze:
S Seabreeze Rd
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 12 of 15
Context and Compatibility
• The property is located within the southern portion of the County and accessed by S
Seabreeze Road, which connects directly to Carolina Beach Road, a principal arterial
highway.
• The subject site is located within the Seabreeze community, which served as a beach resort
community for African Americans from the 1930’s to the 1950’s. While the subject site is
undeveloped, a few structures from this community remain within the general vicinity.
• This area was the focus of the Seabreeze Small Area Plan, created in 1989. The
recommendations for the area included a revitalization of the businesses and a
redevelopment of the waterfront. However, this revitalization has not been accomplished
since the adoption of the plan, and some of the historic structures have been converted into
luxury homes.
• There is a proposed commercial development at the entrance of Seabreeze.
• The parcels surrounding the subject property and in the immediate vicinity are zoned B-2;
the parcel directly to the south has been a Bed and Breakfast since 2004.
• . Due to the size and shape of parcels in the area, location of nearby residential, and
regulations for B-2 zoned properties, potential for commercial development of the parcels
would be challenging.
• Given the need for private wells and septic systems or the extension of private utilities, the
area has not experienced the anticipated commercial growth intended by the initial B-2
zoning in the area.
• The change of zoning from the B-2 parcel to an R-7 would result in the adjacent parcel to
the south becoming a legal nonconformity due to the setbacks and buffering that are
required for B-2 parcels that abut residential uses.
• The existing land uses within the area include a mix of small and large single-family
dwellings and boat storage.
• While the land of the subject sites is located within the VE flood zone, development at the
scale proposed by the R-7 zoning district exists within other portions of the County that share
similar flood risks, namely the beach communities of Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach and
Kure Beach.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 13 of 15
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be
interpreted as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors.
Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational,
commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 14 of 15
Analysis
The B-2 zoning was originally applied to this part of Seabreeze in 1971 to
encourage light commercial development in the area. The Community Mixed
Use Place Type was applied to this area during the development of the
2016 Comprehensive Plan to support and encourage the mix of uses
envisioned in the 1989 Seabreeze Small Area Plan. However, the size and
shape of the parcels and lack of private water and sewer limited this
development, and much of the intended commercial revitalization did not
materialize. The majority of this portion of Seabreeze remains zoned for
commercial use, which would be congruent with the Community Mixed Use
Place Type.
While this area is designated for moderate densities and mixed residential
and commercial uses, the entire parcel is within the VE Coastal High Hazard
Area. Generally, lower residential densities are recommended for flood
prone areas in the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the number of
homeowners with higher risks of flood damage. There are several locations
in the county other than the Seabreeze area, for instance the western bank
area across from downtown Wilmington, portions of Monkey Junction, and
land near Cape Fear Community College North Campus, where higher
densities and intensities are recommended for areas in flood zones, though.
Staff has historically interpreted that place type classifications seeking
higher intensity and mixed uses are intended to override density limits more
generally placed in flood prone areas, as lower densities would not allow
the place type recommendations but flood proofing and engineering
solutions could mitigate risks that might be associated with higher densities.
AQUA water and sewer services to this lot would only be available through
a mainline extension; otherwise, this property can only be serviced through
a well and septic system permitted through NHC Environmental Health. The
two large live oak trees on the property further limit the developability of
this parcel.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because it provides housing in line with the purposes
and intent of the Community Mixed Use Place Type.
Z23-24 Staff Report PB 1.4.2024 Page 15 of 15
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning
considerations, and technical review.
While the proposed density of 4.2 dwelling units per acre fits under the maximum recommended
density of the Community Mixed Use Place Type, the existing conditions of the site, including the VE
Coastal High Hazard Area flood designation, large live oak trees, lack of available water and
sewer, and surrounding remaining B-2 zoned parcels make this parcel very limited in
developability.
As a result, Staff recommends disapproval of the proposal and suggests the following motion:
I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it
provides housing densities in line with the Community Mixed Use Place Type, I find
recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest
because of the County’s goal to limit residential development in flood prone areas, and
because of the challenges in developing the site at the proposed density given the site
features desired to be protected.
Alternative Motion for APPROVAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or
other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds approval appropriate.)
I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it
provides housing densities in line with the Community Mixed Use Place Type, and I find
recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because the proposal would benefit the community by providing more housing
options.
Recommended Conditions (if the Board finds approval appropriate.)
1. Both live oak trees on the property will be preserved as part of this development.
2. No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots.
3. There will be one driveway cut across both lots.