Loading...
2024-05-30 Agenda Review NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 226 ASSEMBLY The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners met on May 30, 2024 at 4:04 p.m. for Agenda Review in Conference Rooms 138-139 at the New Hanover County Government Center, 230 Government Center Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina. Members present: Chair Bill Rivenbark; Vice-Chair LeAnn Pierce; Commissioner Jonathan Barfield, Jr.; Commissioner Dane Scalise; and Commissioner Rob Zapple. Staff present: County Manager Chris Coudriet; Clerk to the Board Kymberleigh G. Crowell; and County Attorney K. Jordan Smith. Chair Rivenbark called the Agenda Review meeting to order stating the purpose is for the Board to review and discuss the June 3, 2024 Regular Meeting agenda items. Consent Agenda Item #4: Approval of Lowest Bid Contract Award to ES&J Enterprises, Inc. Environmental Management Director Joe Suleyman responded to questions stating that this project will not affect the landfill gas recovery project. He explained the difference between a temporary cell closure and a final cell closure. It will be close to two and a half years before work will be done in this area again once the temporary closure is completed, allowing time for the area to settle. As to price, Mr. Suleyman stated the price came in under budget and is close to what it was during the last project. Consent Agenda Item #5: Adoption of Year-End Budget Amendment to Account for Anticipated Overage in Public Safety Function. Chief Financial Officer Eric Credle responded to questions stating that the $9 million should carry through the end of the fiscal year. Consent Agenda Item #6: Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Negotiation of an Installment Financing Contract Not to Exceed $37.5 Million, Directing the Publication of Notice with Respect Thereto, Declaring the Intent of the County to Reimburse Itself for Capital Expenditures From Proceeds Thereof, and Providing for Certain Other Related Matters. Mr. Credle responded to questions stating if the resolution is adopted, the County will reimburse the General Fund for work that has already been done, as well as for two fire stations, a library, and some standard civic items. The County will need to go back to the Local Government Commission (LGC) for approval, and the tentative date for that meeting is August 6, 2024. Mr. Credle does not see any red flags regarding the LGC’s approval. Consent Agenda Item #7: Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an Installment Financing Contract with TD Equipment Finance, Inc. to Finance the Acquisition of Various Vehicles and Equipment. Mr. Credle responded to questions stating that this is for replacement vehicles. There is $2.1 million for the Sheriff’s Office, $1.2 million for the remainder of the enterprise, $2.1 million for equipment for Environmental Management, and $828,000 for a pump truck for Fire Rescue. Mr. Credle stated that the surplus request for items being replaced th will be on the June 17 agenda for approval. Regular Agenda Item #11: Rezoning Request (Z24-03) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf of Littlebird Properties, LLC, to rezone approximately 4.93 acres at 3121 Castle Hayne Road from B-1, Neighborhood Business, and R-20, Residential to (CZD) B-2, Regional Business for two commercial structures totaling a maximum of 19,150 square feet for Contractor Office and other limited uses. Associate Planner Love Ott responded to questions stating that other than the buffer, there has not been any additional discussion regarding flooding concerns at Ness Creek. Planning and Land Use Director Rebekah Roth reported the plans have been provided to other County departments, and there has not been any comment from the Stormwater Department regarding the flooding concerns. Discussion ensued regarding the site plan. Regarding the commercial flex space, Ms. Ott stated that the buildings are single-story and that there is a condition on the plan to have no outdoor storage near the flex space east of the Ness Creek tributary. Outdoor storage is allowed to the north of the property, further away from the subdivision. She also reported that there has not been any opposition to the rezoning. Commissioner Barfield commented that the possibility of flooding at Ness Creek has been noted in several places, so the contractors are aware of the risks. Regular Agenda Item #12: Rezoning Request (Z24-07) - Request by Sam Franck with Ward and Smith, P.A., applicant, on behalf of YMCA of Eastern North Carolina, INC, contract purchaser and Corbett Package Company, property owner, to rezone approximately 53 acres of an approximately 242-acre parcel zoned R-15, Residential located on the 6600 block of the north side of Sidbury Road to a general use CB, Community Business district. Senior Planner Zach Dickerson responded to questions stating that a list of allowable by-right uses has been included in the agenda packet. If the YMCA does not use a portion of the project acreage, any use allowed in the Community Business (CB) district would be permitted. The intent of the CB district is to provide commercial services for the immediately surrounding residential areas. Regarding the decision not to pursue conditional rezoning, Mr. Dickerson explained that it is more common for larger tracts of land without a site plan to opt for general rezoning to a CB district, as it benefits the entire parcel. Development Review Supervisor Robert Farrell confirmed that the 53 acres are on the north side of Sidbury Road, and any questions about site use plans should be addressed by the applicant. Regular Agenda Item #13: Special Use Permit Request (S24-01) - Tarin Woods - Shiloh Drive Additional Dwelling Allowance - Request by Samuel Potter with Equitas Law Partners, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Hoosier Daddy, LLC, property owner, for an Additional Dwelling Allowance to increase the allowed density up to 10.2 dwelling units per acre for 24 parcels totaling approximately 16.78 acres of land currently zoned R-15, Residential NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 227 located at 535, 539, 543, and 547 Manassas Drive and unaddressed parcels on the 5900 block of Shiloh Drive. Mr. Farrell reported that the applicant withdrew the application at 2:30 p.m. today. He provided an overview of the differences between this request and the previous plan considered by the Board. Last year, a conditional rezoning was submitted for this portion of the property along with a portion to the north of Tarin Woods, which included a mix of townhomes and single-family homes. The current request, under the additional dwelling allowance, is only for the Shiloh Drive portion of the project area and proposes more multi-family and townhomes, changing the land use slightly. Mr. Farrell believes this item will come back in the future. Discussion ensued regarding what is allowed if the Board denies an application. Mr. Farrell explained in response to questions that installing infrastructure is common with commercial projects before final approval but not with residential projects, which would go through the Technical Review Committee (TRC) process. Installing infrastructure without approval, other than what is allowed by- right, is a risk. The northern portion of Tarin Woods has experienced this, with roads being constructed without development approvals, only the installation of infrastructure. Approval from Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) for installing water and sewer has been received, which is also at the developer's risk. If a project is denied, the applicant can either change their application and resubmit or develop at the current intensity of their zoning district. Mr. Farrell stated he would have to check with CFPUA to see if the water and sewer lines have been turned over to CFPUA or if the developer still owns them. He further stated that it is the staff’s understanding that the applicant intends to amend or change the concept plan they previously submitted and restart the process. Regular Agenda Item #14: Comprehensive Plan Update - Request by New Hanover County Planning and Land Use to amend the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure policies. Long Range Planner Dylan McDonnell stated in response to questions that the bicycle and pedestrian priorities plan achieves two main goals. First, it incorporates the Board's policy direction for bicycle and pedestrian easements along Carolina Beach Road. Second, it affirms the County's commitment to expanding bicycle and pedestrian facilities, specifically targeting priority areas and major corridors where infrastructure already exists. He explained in response to questions that the County partners with the Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO), which manages regional transportation planning, including bicycle infrastructure. The WMPO is currently updating its Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Projects identified in this plan could move to the larger state transportation plan, potentially securing federal and state funding. The plan reflects the preferred infrastructure locations and envisions a continuous bike route from the northern part of the County to Fort Fisher. A brief discussion ensued about safety infrastructure at crosswalks. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Budget Overview. County Manager Coudriet and Mr. Credle presented the budget as follows:  Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Recommended Budget: Sustaining the Board of Commissioners’ Strategic Plan:  Recommended budget framework:  Retain and reform some priorities set by the Board through its adopted strategic plan and Board actions:  Workforce and Economic Development  Community safety and well-being  Sustainable land use and environmental stewardship  Revenue parameters preferred by the Board through discussion:  No use of revenue stabilization fund  Minimize taxes and fees  Budget Overview:  Fourth year of assessed property values locked in at FY 2021 values + inflation + ARP sunsetting:  Result is relatively flat revenues and higher costs to provide service  Budget highlights:  No change in property tax rates (45 cents per $100)  No principal use of Revenue Stabilization Fund (RSF)  Commitment to school funding:  $5.5 million of additional operating funds for New Hanover County Schools (NHCS):  $99.6 million in total operating funds (versus request of $104.16 million)  $1.95 million for continued pre-K funding (matches request)  The County continues to provide the same number of nurses and school mental health counselors:  Revenue from the schools for these services declines $2.1 million  Commitment of $3 million for workforce housing; year 3 of 5:  ARP funded for FY 2024-25  Community safety and well-being:  Continuation of the following initiatives:  School Resource Officers (SROs) in every school  Expanded service of Elements  Expanded service of Too Good for Violence  Expanded Senior Resource Center congregate meals  Legal Aid/Second Chance (2/3 of prior year funding)  Northside Food Coop  Mental Health and Substance Use strategies: $1.9 million  Opioid Settlement Funds strategies: $3.4 million NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 228  Robin Hood Road Medical Detox Center: $6.1 million (state/partner funded)  Fiscal considerations:  Minimal enhancements - $3.2 million in General Fund:  Half of that amount is for a new door system at the detention center: $1.6 million  Comprehensive Land Use Plan study: $450,000  Laney and Ogden Park tennis court resurfacing: $335,000  Nine full time employees (FTEs): five for Medicaid Expansion (50% state funded), three for Parks and Gardens, and one for Cooperative Extension (100% reimbursed by non- profit) for a total cost of $321,000  Reallocation of resources from:  Port City United (PCU):  The County remains committed to the employees and will place them whenever possible  United Way capacity building  Technical certifications program  Community Resource Coordinators  Department cuts of $1.35 million (non-personnel)  All budgeting contingencies eliminated Discussion ensued about the reallocation of resources and information. Commissioner Barfield expressed concerns about the County partnering with three nonprofits, which are already stretched in their capacity, as they have hired personnel to achieve the County’s goals but are now cutting those resources by asking the nonprofits to fire those same employees. He believes the County should directly communicate with the approximately 20 affected employees rather than leaving it to the nonprofits. He recognized the importance of United Way's capacity-building programs to help nonprofits grow and better serve the greater community. He stated he has not heard three Commissioners say anything about most items the county manager is saying he has heard the Board state, particularly with PCU, which he does not agree with cutting. While the initial Board may not have fully understood the program's parameters and challenges, eliminating an entire department due to a few individuals’ actions is inappropriate. He is not in favor of cutting any of the programs, emphasizing that the County has sufficient resources, such as the RSF, to fund government operations. While local municipalities are raising revenue to cover increased costs, the County is asking department heads to cut resources when the funding sources are available. He agrees that this is a rich community and believes it should be reflected in how the County allocates and spends resources to serve its citizens. He reiterated that some of the proposed cuts he does not support, and he will not support the recommended budget. He then asked for the recommendations Commissioners Scalise and Zapple proposed based on their comments during a previous budget work session. County Manager Coudriet responded that no recommendations have been received since the line-by-line budget was made available. Commissioner Scalise reported he has discussed the $3 million in housing funds and other budget-saving measures with County Manager Coudriet. He acknowledged having policy preferences and a commitment to advancing them, as he believes they are important for the community's financial health. While he is only one vote on the board, he considers managing money wisely crucial for maintaining wealth and intends to support a budget like the current proposal. Commissioner Barfield stated this is the most challenging budget during his tenure. He commented on the County’s necessity to partner with nonprofits to achieve its mission and strategic plan, noting that the proposed budget creates challenges for many community members by removing resources and cutting jobs. County Manager Coudriet stated his understanding of Commissioner Barfield’s comments and acknowledged that at no point did the Board as a body direct a wind down. He has tried to reflect what he understood to be likely priorities while dealing with the difficult proposition of recommending using RSF, which requires a supermajority vote. He owns the cuts, which have been difficult to recommend, which are based on the budget work session discussions, and he believes are most responsive to the discourse. He also owns that the recommended th budget is being presented on May 20, when traditionally it is presented during the second meeting in May. Regarding the capacity building with United Way, he stated that appropriations made in the current fiscal year do not have to be spent by June 30, but they do need to be allocated and will be contracted before the end of this fiscal year. The funding will be available on July 1 and will carry the nonprofits through the end of FY25. Commissioner Zapple shared similar opinions to Commissioner Barfield’s comments regarding the commitments made in the community building program. He highlighted the negative perception associated with the name "Port City United" and suggested that this stigma is overshadowing the program's beneficial work in underserved areas. He emphasized that PCU and initiatives like Port City Connect have effectively connected residents to available services, significantly benefiting the community. He expressed concern that dismantling the framework built over two years would result in a loss of valuable community services. He stressed that the program has been instrumental in uplifting the community. County Manager Coudriet reiterated his acknowledgment of the comments made and noted another fact in the recommended budget that may cause discomfort, which is the elimination of operating contingencies. This means that if costs exceed estimates, such as replacement computers, additional funds will need to be requested from the Board or adjustments will need to be made, like reducing the number of computers purchased. He emphasized efforts to balance the budget without relying on RSF this year, driven by a 21% increase in business costs and flat sales taxes. He continued the presentation as follows:  Employees:  3.88% cost-of-living adjustment for County employees; March to March CPI-U South Region. No merit increases. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 229  Medical premium increase of up to $28.26 per month  Rollback of 2.0x overtime pay to 1.5x for Sheriff detention officers  Economic development funding:  Budget = $765,000 versus Prior Year of $957,000 (20% decrease)  Funding for the following was cut by 33%: Chamber of Commerce, Cucalorus Film Foundation, Wilmington Downtown, Inc., Cape Fear Resource Conservation and Development, Friends of Fort Fisher, Highway 17 Transportation Association, Wilmington Symphony Orchestra  Level Funding for: Cape Fear Council of Governments Continuum of Care, Southeastern Economic Development Commission, Wilmington Business Development (2% Increase), Wilmington Regional Film Commission  Other:  Airport route marketing maintained: $250,000 (FY24 was the initial year)  $750,000 in supplemental WAVE funding to support more frequent and effective routes and ride share services County Manager Coudriet responded to questions, stating that staff has not recommended a maximum cost of living allowance (COLA) because merit increases are not being requested. The investment in COLA and jobs is not rated based on the person but on the work being asked for. He feels that compensation should scale with the market as it is. It also keeps pace with the pay and classification plan the Board implemented last year. He believes this year, 3.88%, irrespective of the earned income, is the right model but recognizes that the Board may feel differently. As to the supplemental funding for WAVE, the funding the County is putting into WAVE is reaping benefits. He noted that public ridership was compressing nationwide and not increasing after the pandemic. The County is one of the areas where ridership is growing, but he believes the on-demand service is driving some of the increase.  Budget highlights for Capital Projects in FY24 and FY25:  Culture and recreation: Project Grace, Northchase Library, NCSU Extension (Administration Building), Northern Regional Park, North College Road Trail, Smith Creak Park Phase 2A, and Trails End Pier  Infrastructure: Last Frontier, Blue Clay Business Park, and Holly Shelter Business Park  Community Building/Well-being and other: Robin Hood Medical Detox, Northside Food Coop, and Board of Elections  Spending recommendations for major funds:  Tax rates: no change:  Proposed General Fund tax rate: 45 cents:  42.90 cents dedicated to the General Fund  2.10 cents dedicated to the Debt Service Fund  Proposed Fire Services rate: 7.25 cents (no change from the FY23-24 adopted rate)  Fees:  Proposed Stormwater Services fee: $6.14 ERU per month:  8.7 percent increase from the prior year (rate has not changed since inception)  Approximately $400,000 of additional annual revenue to maintain and enhance level of service  Proposed Recycling and Solid Waste fee: $52 per ton:  No change from FY23-24  $2 surcharge for state included  General Fund revenues:  Ad valorem: $233.2 million:  Tax base: $51.64 billion (2.2% increase over the prior year)  Ad valorem rate of 45 cents ($0.021 Debt Service Fund, $0.429 General Fund)  Sales taxes: $116.2 million (assumes no growth over the FY24 adopted amount)  Fund Balance (no budgeted use of Fund Balance) County Manager Coudriet responded to questions about the Fund Balance, noting that the County is currently at 19.02% but will be closer to 18% on July 1 because the County did appropriate Fund Balance during the current fiscal year. A brief discussion ensued regarding when the County went below 18% after Hurricane Florence and the funding was recouped to bring the Fund Balance back over 21%.  Other revenues:  Revenue Stabilization Fund for FY25:  $6.1 million in earnings to be transferred to General Fund for operations  No principal usage NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 230  Mental Health and Substance Use Fund: $10.5 million budgeted for FY25:  Interest: $1.7 million, includes $621,000 of prior year interest earnings  Principal: $8.8 million  Budgeted for Mental Health Strategies, Schools Nurses/Therapists, Getting Home  Expected debt proceeds: $8.75 million:  Door system for detention center ($1.6 million)  Vehicles ($3 million)  Cape Fear Community College (CFCC) Capital ($1.9 million)  Additionally, the Capital Improvement Plan presented herein contemplates an additional $4.875 million in borrowings in FY25  Debt Service Fund:  Appropriated Fund Balance: $2.8 million  $2.2 million transfer in of earned interest from school bond capital funds  General Fund revenues:  General Fund expenditures: County Manager Coudriet responded to questions stating that of the school expenditures, only seven percent of the overall expenditures are statutorily the County’s responsibility. The County is responsible for building public schools and community college facilities, and with that comes some associated responsibilities for the maintenance. He noted that 33% of expenditures go towards education, which does not include capital.  FY24-25 Recommended Budget in summary:  General and Debt Service Funds:  No change to property tax rate (FY25 recommended at assessment rate of 45 cents):  42.9 cents to the General Fund  2.1 cents for the Debt Fund  Fire Rescue: no change (FY25 recommended at 7.25 cents)  Recycling and Solid Waste: no change to tip fee (FY25 recommended at $52/ton)  Stormwater Services: increase fee: FY25 recommended at $6.14 per equivalent residential unit (ERU)/Month  Enhanced services: enhancements focus on the continuation of services and enhanced Medicaid Expansion as well as enhanced services for Parks and Recreation services  Investing in the workforce: implementation of a 3.88% COLA to match CPI  Strategic growth: strategic capital investments to maintain growth  Enhanced services of Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder strategy:  Continued and enhanced funding for critical mental health and opioid recovery  Continued workforce housing support:  Continuation of funding the County’s $3 million workforce development housing commitment (proposed ARP funded)  Strong educational commitment:  NHCS: $5.5 million operating increase over the prior year, maintains all mental health therapists, nurses, and SROs  CFCC: continuation of prior year funding  Vibrant community partnerships:  $1.6 million for 70 non-county agencies to enhance the County’s mission and goals County Manager Coudriet responded to questions stating that he believes 40-45 non-county agencies were provided funding last year. He confirmed that the County is using the same amount of money from last year to fund more non-county agencies this year. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 231  Next steps:  Board deliberation and direction to staff th  Public hearing scheduled for Monday, June 17 thth  Budget adoption no sooner than Monday, June 17, or on/before June 30 General discussion ensued about the presentation. Commissioner Barfield commented on the significant increase in per-student funding since joining the Board in 2008, noting it has nearly doubled. He emphasized the Board's commitment to public education, including raising educator salaries to the highest in the state by increasing the supplement and providing a $1,500 bonus to school employees around Christmas. He stressed the importance of investing in public schools for economic and community development. He stated his support of the NHCS request for just over $10 million, citing the Board's history of funding positions beyond state mandates for positions, which is currently almost 700 positions. He also stressed the need for sufficient funding for the student-facing positions to ensure quality education and support for every child, sharing a personal story about his grandson's experience in daycare to illustrate the importance of adequate staffing. By doing so, the students can become productive citizens in the community. County Manager Coudriet responded to questions about the 32.1% increase in Fire Rescue’s budget, stating that the increase was for two new fire stations, which are about $14 million combined. There is also $25,000 in the budget for early cancer detection testing for firefighters. Commissioner Scalise commented on the school board’s role in setting policy versus the County's role in providing funding to support those policies. He inquired about the possibility for the County to unclassify allocated funds for nursing, mental health, and pre-K, and instead providing a larger sum of approximately $9.6 million to the school system. While the County can express hopes for the appropriate use of funds, the school board should determine how to spend the money. County Manager Coudriet responded that the County could do this, but there is no certainty that there would be a school nurse or a school-based mental health therapist available at every school. He explained that these positions are New Hanover County employees and their placement in schools is secured through an agreement with the school system, ensuring the provision levels of the services. However, nothing prohibits the Board from commingling the funds as a general appropriation to the school system as it relates to pre- K. However, doing so would remove the certainty that the same number of classrooms serving the community would remain. While some classrooms might still exist, the supported model might not persist in either scenario. After a brief discussion of the proposal, Commissioner Scalise stated that this is just a proposal and noted that the Board should trust the school board to set policy, as those members are elected to do. He further acknowledged the challenges in creating the recommended budget, which reflects the Commissioners' diverse and sometimes competing priorities. He noted the importance of government leading by example, especially during challenging times when many community members face financial constraints. He commended the staff's effort to create a budget that mirrors the community's situation and expressed optimism that it is close to something the Board could agree upon. He remains open to further dialogue individually or during another budget session but hopes that this will serve as a good starting point for the Board to achieve something reflective of the realities of 2024. Vice-Chair Pierce commended County Manager Coudriet for his detailed work on the budget and expressed her support of it as presented. However, she is hesitant with Commissioner Scalise’s proposal to designate specific funds, noting that funds were not allocated to some of the proper places which has created further pressure on the Board to find additional funding. She noted that she would need more time to consider it and would ask County Manager Coudriet and staff to provide the potential benefits or drawbacks. Commissioner Barfield stressed the importance of maintaining County values, particularly in funding school nurses, SROs, and pre-K classrooms, stating that these values should not fluctuate and stressing that excellence requires investment. He pointed out that while school boards cannot generate their own revenue, the County must decide on its priorities and lead by example. He noted the significance of mental health resources in schools due to the increasing challenges students face. He also emphasized the County's role in supporting public education, the positive impact on community growth and quality of life, and striving for excellence in community services, like how businesses aim for growth and improvement. Vice-Chair Pierce departed the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Commissioner Zapple commented in response to the school funding concerns raised by Commissioner Scalise, his willingness to consider providing a lump sum to the schools. He highlighted that the NHCS Board of Education had previously reallocated funds intended for nurses and mental health therapists, resulting in the County essentially paying for the services twice. He pointed out the County's commitment to funding these positions as a policy decision and was hesitant to declassify the funds to avoid repeating past issues. He praised County Manager Coudriet for allocating $9.55 million to close the funding gap but stressed the importance of ensuring the funds are used as intended to prevent future problems. A brief discussion followed about the need for school nurses and their qualifications for administering medicine to children. Commissioner Zapple underscored the necessity of having a nurse in every school. Commissioner Barfield recalled that in 2011, while serving as Chair, he proposed working with NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BOOK 36 MAY 30, 2024 AGENDA REVIEW MEETING PAGE 232 the local delegation to pass a bill granting the Board of Commissioners more authority over school system fund allocation. This initiative, achievable through a local bill, had been considered but was not pursued due to opposition from a few commissioners. He noted that the increased funding subsequently went to the administration instead of its intended purposes. He believes such a bill would provide greater discretion over fund utilization, though he is unsure whether this is still an available option. County Manager Coudriet, who was the assistant county manager at the time, remembered the County discussions about this initiative. County Manager Coudriet responded to questions stating that there are no plans to have a budget presentation on June 3, 2024, and that this presentation was intended to convey budget recommendations and meet the statutory requirements. He further stated that all documents have been provided to the Board and staff is available to convene at the Board's discretion for any additional work sessions, noting the upcoming public hearing on the proposed budget is slated to be on the June 17, 2024 agenda. He reminded the Board that If there are to be th budget meetings after June 17, they need to be held on or before June 30, 2024. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Rivenbark adjourned the meeting at 6:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kymberleigh G. Crowell Clerk to the Board Please note that the above minutes are not a verbatim record of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners meeting. The entire proceedings are available online at www.nhcgov.com.