HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-2-2024 TRC Agenda Full1
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA
October 2nd, 2024
New Hanover County’s Technical Review Committee (TRC) will meet Wednesday, October 2, 2024
at 2:00 p.m. to discuss the below items.
PLEASE NOTE:
This meeting will be conducted remotely via teleconference. Interested parties can contact the Planning
and Land Use Department at 910-798-7165 for more information.
Item 1: Hilton Bluffs Master Plan – Major Subdivision Preliminary Plan – SUBPP-24-0010
Request by Copper Builders, LLC for a 4,000 unit master planned major subdivision. The site is
located at Sledge Road at Castle Hayne Road to the NE Cape Fear River, north of GE. The total
acreage is 4,039 acres, zoned Rural Agricultural. The engineer is Allison Engebretson with
Paramounte Engineering (angebretson@paramounte-eng.com). The case planner is Robert
Farrell, (rfarrell@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7164)
Item 2: Metro Circle RV and Boat Storage – Commercial Site Plan – SITECN-24-000036
Request by Tim Littlejohn with Spartan Construction Management, LLC for RV and Boat Storage
(tlittlejohn@spartanbuilt.com). The site is located at 310 Metro Circle, and is 1.81 acres, zoned
I-2. The engineer is GS&E Geomatics Surveying & Engineering, Inc. The case planner is Zach
Dickerson (zdickerson@nhcgov.com 910-798-7450).
Item 3: Reagan Retail – Commercial Site Plan – SITECN-24-000038
Request by Robert Reagan, Jr. of Reagan, LLC (rreagan007@gmail.com) for a retail and general
office space. The site is located at 5901 Castle Hayne Road and is 1.75 acres, zoned B-2. The
engineer is Adam Ellis with Intracoastal Engineering (adam@intracoastal.com). The case
planner is Zach Dickerson (zdickerson@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7450).
Item 4: Dad’s Tire Store & Flex Space- Commercial Site Plan – SITECN-24-000039
Request by Rick and Deanne Meadows for a flex commercial space. The site is located at 4737
Castle Hayne Road and is 0.84 acres zoned (CZD) B-2, tied to rezoning Z24-05. The engineer is
Branch Smith with Dogwood PLLC (dogwoodpllc@gmail.com). The case planner is Zach
Dickerson (zdickerson@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7450)
2
Item 5: Hooks & Arrow Retail – Commercial Site Plan – SITECN-24-000040
Request by Dana Vess of Hooks & Arrow Sportsman Supply, LLC for a retail store. The site is
located at 802 S Seabreeze Road and is 0.25 acres, zoned (CZD) CB, tied to rezoning Z24-09. The
engineer is Branch Smith with Dogwood PLLC (dogwoodpllc@gmail.com). The case planner is
Amy Doss (adoss@nhcgov.com, 910-798-7571)
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Allison Engebretson, Paramounte Engineering, aengebretson@paramounte-eng.com
Emily Mattocks, Copper Builders, emily@copperbuilders.com
From: Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC Review
PID#: R00900-001-001-000
Egov# SUBPP-24-0010
Subject: Hilton Bluffs Master Plan and Phase 1 - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Robert Farrell 910-798-7164
1. General Comments
a. The properties are zoned RA which allows a maximum of 1 dwelling unit per acre for
performance residential subdivisions.
b. Reconcile some conflicting numbers in the plans:
i. Page 3 Site Data lists maximum 4,000 units at 0.99 du/ac
ii. The future lot calculations at the bottom result in 4,030, but the page lists 4031.
2. Vesting:
a. Section 3.1.3.D.8.b states developments containing more than 150 dwelling units may
request a public hearing by the Planning Board for a vesting determination.
b. If approved, the vesting would be valid for 5 years and confer the right to develop the
total number of dwelling units approved, and the general type of units in accordance with
the approved site plan.
c. Alternatively, the plans for the remaining phases can be more specific and a preliminary
plan approval issued for the entire site.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 2
3. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. Parking will be required for the amenity area. That will be shown on separate commercial
plans when that proposed structure is reviewed through a separate TRC process.
4. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required as part of the application materials.
b. The TIA will need to be approved by NCDOT and the WMPO before TRC approval is
granted for the Master Plan and Phase 1.
5. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. A separate tree retention permit will need to be submitted through COAST.
b. Given the site of the tract, a plot sampling methodology is recommended.
c. Also given the amount of conservation area that is required, staff recommends using that
as the master tree retention area for the entire project. That will eliminate the need to
chart tree mitigation in each phase of the development.
d. If a master tree retention area is not used to account for any required mitigation, each
phase will be required to show the following in each submitted phase:
i. Total required mitigation for entire project.
ii. Amount of mitigation in each approved phase.
iii. Provided mitigation in submitted phase
iv. Remaining mitigation
6. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. A separate landscaping plan will be required for the amenity area when it is submitted for
permitting.
7. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Streetlights are shown along Sledge Road.
b. A lighting plan for the streetlights will be required with each phase before final plats can
be signed and recorded with the Register of Deeds.
c. Alternatively, a master lighting plan can be submitted for review for the entire site.
8. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. Any subdivision identification signs will need to be reviewed and approved through a
separate permitting process through COAST.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 3
9. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. There 3,072.46 acres of Swamp Forest and Pocosin conservation resources
b. A minimum of 5 acres of a conservation resource triggers additional ordinance
requirements under Section 5.7.
c. Table 5.7.3.A.5 establishes the calculation for determining the minimum amount of
conservation space required. The calculation is the total acreage of the conservation
resource multiplied by 0.5.
i. 3,072.46 acres x 0.5 = 1,536.23 total acres required for conservation.
ii. While Section 5.7 may only require conservation of 1,536.23 acres, the
performance residential standards of Section 3.1.3.D.2 state the total 3,072.46
acres of conservation resources and Class IV soils must be conserved to count
the acreage towards total project density.
d. Table 5.7.4 Additional Performance Controls states that when there are 3 or more acres
of a Swamp Forest or Pocosin conservation resource additional standards are required
under Section 5.7.4.C
i. All structures and impervious surfaces shall be set back 50 feet from the
conservation resource.
1. Phase 1 plan should show the 50-foot setback boundary from the
conservation resources.
ii. On-site retention and percolation areas shall be required for the entire parcel
sufficient to control, at a minimum, the first 0.5 inches of runoff that will originate
from all impervious surfaces anticipated to be on the site upon final development.
The specified amount of runoff from impervious surfaces shall be disposed of by
percolation into the soil, evaporation, transpiration, or other methods of
treatment or handling acceptable to the County Engineering Department.
10. UDO Section 5.8, Open Space Requirements
a. 807 acres of open space required.
b. If all approximately 3,072.46 acres shown in the wetland area of the Master Plan are
conserved as part of the development, it would meet the minimum open space
requirements for the overall project in addition to the 17 acres of the amenity area and
other stormwater features.
11. UDO Article VI Subdivision Design and Improvements
a. Section 6.2.2.A.7.g Street Connectivity Standards
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 4
i. Each phase will need to maintain a minimum link to node ratio of 1.40.
ii. There are 31 links and 19 nodes in Phase 1 of the project. 6/4 = 1.5 which meets
the required street connectivity ratio requirements.
b. Are any traffic calming devices proposed as part of Phase 1? If so, traffic calming devices
will need to be identified on the plan and reviewed and approved as part of the TRC
Preliminary Plan review process.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Please review Typical TRC Comments sent to you via e-mail
2. Need a Fire Hydrant plan
3. How will water supply come from?
4. Fire Flow Analysis required
5. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each development entrance
6. Gate details required - Requires both siren activation and a KNOX Entry System installed.
7. Any chance of coming in off Indian Corn Trail?
8. What will the Front Future Development be?
9. The Clubhouse. What is the square footage be? Will it be sprinklered? If so a fire hydrant shall
be within 100 foot of the FDC.
10. Fire Finals required.
11. These are my comments for now - More to follow as project moves forward.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 5
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
2. A County stormwater permit issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit applications documentation with requisite review fees to the COAST online
permit portal (https://newhanovercountync-
energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home). Applicable forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/251/Stormwater however the application form is not required as the
information will be gathered by the COAST portal.
3. This parcel qualifies for an exemption to the County’s pre and post storm attenuation
requirements should it be design in accordance with the City and County’s Low Impact Design
(LID) Manual (http://laserfiche.nhcgov.com/weblink/0/edoc/3273331/LID-Manual.pdf). Please
provide requisite documentation for compliance with LID manual and a variance request in
accordance with NHC UDO, Section 7.12 during the County stormwater permitting process. As
park’s parcel’s are developed and impervious area added, each parcel will need submit for a
County stormwater permit and meet the pre and post storm attenuation requirements unless
LID measures are proposed.
4. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a high density
permit will be obtained.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site(s) must connect to public sewer. Soils in this area are poor for septic system use. All
proposed infrastructure such as storm water ponds must maintain setbacks to surrounding
properties existing septic systems.
2. Site must connect to public water or an application and well permit must be obtained from NC
DEQ Public Water Supply section.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. Street names will need to be approved prior to TRC approval. Please send me your list of street
name suggestions with alternatives.
2. Please contact planning for addresses following TRC approval
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 6
Soil & Water Conservation District, Dru Harrison 910-798-7130
1. See attached.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. CFPUA water and sewer available via mainline extension; pump station will also be installed.
5. Capacity is dependent on the analysis of the pipe collection system (gravity and force mains).
6. A capacity determination can be provided upon submittal of the NC DWQ FTA/FTSE Application
Form and a Preliminary Plan, this determination does not guarantee capacity.
7. Capacity is issued to projects on a first come, first serve basis, when capacity is available, the
plans meet Authority requirements, and the NC DWQ FTA/FTSE forms are signed by the
Authority
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. See attached
WMPO, Bill McDow 910-473-5130
1. See attached
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Brad Shaver
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Hilton Bluffs Subdivision
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Baymeade fine sand (Be), Dorovan soils
(DO), Johnston soils (JO), Kenansville fine sand (Ke), Kureb sand (Kr), Lakeland sand (La), Leon sand (Le), Murville fine sand (Mu), Onslow loamy fine sand (On),
Rimini sand (Rm), and Borrow Pits (Bp). Disregard the chart on the Soil Survey showing soils for Pender County, that is due to the drawing of the polygon for the
Area of Interest.
According to the booklet “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for Septic
Tank Suitability,” Kenansville, Kureb, Rimini and Lakeland sand are Class I soils, Baymeade and Onslow is a Class II soils, Leon and Murville are Class III soils, and
Dorovan and Johnston are Class IV soils. If the borrow pit is filled its classification is dependent on the material and method of filling.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kureb, Rimini, and Lakeland as excessively well drained, Baymeade and Kenansville as well drained, Onslow as
somewhat poorly drained, Leon as poorly drained, and Murville, Dorovan, and Johnston as very poorly drained. There is no determination for a filled borrow pit.
Murville, Doravan, and Johnston soils are on the New Hanover County Hydric Soils Ä list which means they are possibly wetland areas and subject to regulation under the
Clean Water Act. Kureb, Rimini, and Lakeland are on the Hydric Soils “B” list which means there may be areas of wetland included in the mapping unit. It should be noted, according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover County, the limitation for dwellings
with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for all the soils on this site. The limitations are due to flooding and/or wetness. An adequate
drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible
wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover County, North
Carolina, and Pender
County, North Carolina
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................12
Map Unit Descriptions........................................................................................12
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................15
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes........................................15
Bp—Borrow pits..........................................................................................16
DO—Dorovan soils......................................................................................17
JO—Johnston soils.....................................................................................18
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.......................................19
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes.......................................................20
La—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes..................................................21
Le—Leon sand............................................................................................23
Mu—Murville fine sand................................................................................24
On—Onslow loamy fine sand......................................................................25
Rm—Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes.....................................................26
W—Water....................................................................................................28
Pender County, North Carolina.......................................................................29
Do—Dorovan muck, frequently flooded......................................................29
Jo—Johns fine sandy loam.........................................................................30
KeB—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes.....................................31
W—Water....................................................................................................32
References............................................................................................................33
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
0
2
0
0
0
38
0
3
0
0
0
38
0
4
0
0
0
38
0
5
0
0
0
38
0
6
0
0
0
38
0
7
0
0
0
38
0
8
0
0
0
38
0
9
0
0
0
38
0
2
0
0
0
38
0
3
0
0
0
38
0
4
0
0
0
38
0
5
0
0
0
38
0
6
0
0
0
38
0
7
0
0
0
38
0
8
0
0
0
38
0
9
0
0
0
222000 223000 224000 225000 226000 227000 228000 229000 230000 231000 232000 233000
222000 223000 224000 225000 226000 227000 228000 229000 230000 231000 232000 233000
34° 23' 24'' N
78
°
1
'
3
3
'
'
W
34° 23' 24'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
5
'
'
W
34° 19' 18'' N
78
°
1
'
3
3
'
'
W
34° 19' 18'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
5
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 2500 5000 10000 15000
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Meters
Map Scale: 1:53,500 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales
ranging from 1:15,800 to 1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil Survey Area: Pender County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 26, Sep 13, 2023
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey
area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at
different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil
properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Be Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6
percent slopes
202.6 3.3%
Bp Borrow pits 14.9 0.2%
DO Dorovan soils 1,716.4 28.2%
JO Johnston soils 1,394.8 22.9%
Ke Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
164.6 2.7%
Kr Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
13.1 0.2%
La Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
77.6 1.3%
Le Leon sand 459.4 7.5%
Mu Murville fine sand 638.3 10.5%
On Onslow loamy fine sand 22.9 0.4%
Rm Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent
slopes
13.3 0.2%
W Water 422.7 6.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 5,140.7 84.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 6,087.3 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Do Dorovan muck, frequently
flooded
626.8 10.3%
Jo Johns fine sandy loam 0.0 0.0%
KeB Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
13.4 0.2%
W Water 305.9 5.0%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 946.1 15.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 6,087.3 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Baymeade and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baymeade
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 2 inches: fine sand
E/Bh - 2 to 30 inches: fine sand
Bt - 30 to 40 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 40 to 80 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Minor Components
Lynn haven, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Leon
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Murville, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Torhunta, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, flats
on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bp—Borrow pits
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr2
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents, loamy, and similar soils:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Udorthents, Loamy
Setting
Landform:Ridges
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy mine spoil or earthy fill
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
DO—Dorovan soils
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr4
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dorovan and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dorovan
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Woody organic material
Typical profile
Oe - 0 to 5 inches: muck
Oa - 5 to 85 inches: muck
2Cg - 85 to 95 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 13.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153BY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
JO—Johnston soils
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr5
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr7
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Kureb and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kureb
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces, rims on carolina bays
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 26 inches: sand
C/Bh - 26 to 89 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 1.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
La—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr9
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
21
Map Unit Composition
Lakeland and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lakeland
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 2 inches: sand
C - 2 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:3 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
22
Le—Leon sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrb
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Leon and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Leon
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 15 inches: sand
Bh - 15 to 30 inches: fine sand
BE - 30 to 33 inches: fine sand
E' - 33 to 66 inches: fine sand
B'h - 66 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
23
Mu—Murville fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrh
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Murville, undrained, and similar soils:80 percent
Murville, drained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Murville, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Murville, Drained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Custom Soil Resource Report
24
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
On—Onslow loamy fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrl
Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Onslow and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Onslow
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Custom Soil Resource Report
25
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy fine sand
E/Bh - 4 to 20 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 20 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 68 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY040NC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rm—Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrq
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
26
Map Unit Composition
Rimini and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rimini
Setting
Landform:Rims on carolina bays, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: sand
E - 4 to 58 inches: sand
Bh - 58 to 80 inches: sand
C - 80 to 88 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
27
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
28
Pender County, North Carolina
Do—Dorovan muck, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ww6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dorovan and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dorovan
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Woody organic material
Typical profile
Oe - 0 to 5 inches: muck
Oa - 5 to 85 inches: muck
2Cg - 85 to 95 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 13.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153BY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
29
Jo—Johns fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wwg
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Johns and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Johns
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 7 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 37 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg - 37 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F153AY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
30
Minor Components
Lumbee, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Backswamps on stream terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:1 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
KeB—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wwj
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
31
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
32
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
33
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
34
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Hilton Bluffs – Sledge Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• It is recommended that you reach out to the NCDOT District Office prior to
submitting plans to avoid a redesign of the proposed utilities.
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Required Roadway Improvements:
Once a TIA is approved for the proposed development comments will be made on any
required roadway improvements.
Refer to the NCDOT Roadway Design Manual for help with the design of any roadway
improvements.
Site Plan Comments:
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Refer to the NCDOT Subdivision Manual for design requirements on the proposed
island.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• Show and label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
Show and label all gates with distances to the right of way line.
Label the radii for the driveway proposed driveway/driveways.
• A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed
driveway crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
• Provide auto turn templates for the largest proposed vehicles.
Label the internal protection stem length for the proposed driveway connection.
• Measured from the right-of-way line.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGHT T R IANGLE
10 ' BY 70 'S I GHT T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENTMIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
HILTON BLUFFS
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANYCONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSEDEXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENTOF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUMAPPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
CONTACT THESE UTILITIES
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
SHEET INDEX
SEPTEMBER 2024
C-0.0 COVER SHEET
APPROVALS:CONSULTANTS:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT # 23355.PE
APPLICANT:
ENGINEER /
SURVEYOR :
PREPARED BY:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
-
N
O
T
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
HILTON BLUFFS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE
MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 2024
FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAN / MAJOR SUBDIVISION
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
EXISTING CONDITIONSEX-1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE NORTH
140
SITE
HERMITAGE RD
SLE
D
G
E
R
D
CRO
W
A
T
A
N
R
D
CAST
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
MCD
O
U
G
A
L
D
DR
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
GE
PRELIMINARY PLANC-2.0 - C-2.1
RUN
O
F
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
T
E
R
B
R
A
N
C
H
RU
N
O
F
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
T
E
R
B
R
A
N
C
H
WET WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET WET
X
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
X
X
XXX
XX
XXXXX
XXXXX X
X
XX
X
XXXXX XX XX XXX
XX
XXX
XX
X
X
XXXX
XXXXX
XX
XXX
X
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
W WETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWET WET WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WETWETWET
WETWETWETWET WET WETWETWET WET WET
WETWET
WETWET WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET WET WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET WET WETWETWET
WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWET WET
WETWETWETWET WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWET WET WETWET WET WET WETWET
T
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WET
WETWETWET WETWETWET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET WET WETWETWET WET WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET WET WET WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET WETWET
WETWET WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWET WETWET WET WET WETWET WETWETWET WETWETWET WET WETWET WET WETWETWETWET WET WETWETWET WET WET WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET WETWET
WETWET
WETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
31
30
29 28
27
26
68
69
70
71
72
73
7475
7677
59 60 61
6263
64
65
66
67
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5051525354
55
56
57
58
78
79
80
8182
83
84
85
86
87
88
89 90 91 92 93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100 101102 103 104
171
170
169
168
167
166
165
164
163
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
155
154
130
129
128
127
126 125124 123
135134
133
132
131
144
143
142141
140
139 138 137 136
153152151
150
149
148
147
146
145
122 121120 119
118 117116115
114
113
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
15
14
13 12
11
10
9
8
7
6 5
4
3
2
1
230
229
228
227
226
225
224
192
193
194
195
196
197
191
190
189
188
187
186
185
184
183
182
181
180
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
172
223
222
221
220
219
218
217
216
215
214
213
212
211
210209208207206
205
204
203
202
201
200
199
198
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
D
PHASE 2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHAS
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 1 SECTION B
PHASE
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 1 SECTION C
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
D
PHA
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 3 SECTION C
PHASE
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
G
PARK
PARK
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
RESORT-STYLEPOOL
CLUBHOUSE/SALESOFFICE
COURTYARD
CREEKAMENITY
FITNESSPOOL
LAPPOOL
KID'SPOOL
SUNBATHINGISLANDSUNSHELF
CREEKDECK
GRANDLAWN
CABANAS
POOLTERRACERAMP
POOLDECK
LAND-SCAPE
TENNIS/PICKLEBALLCOURTS
TRAILHEAD &WETLANDOVERLOOK
PHAS
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHASE 1 SECTION B
PHASE
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 3 SECTION G
PH
A
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
PH
A
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
G
PHASE 1 SECTION D
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHAS
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
PH
A
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
SPA
COMMUNITYSPACES
PHASE 2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
WWW
W
WW
WW
WW
WWWWW
WWW
WW
WW
WWWW
WWWW
WWW
WWW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WWWWWWWWWWW WWWWW WWW WW WWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWW WW WWWWW
WWW
WWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWW
WW
WWWWWWWWWWWW
WW
WWWWWWWW
WWW
W
WWWWWWW
WWWW
WWWWWW
WW
WWW
WWW
WWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWW WWW WWW WW WWW WW
WWWWWW
WW
WW
WWW
WW
WWW
WWW
WW
W
WW
WWW
WWW
WWWWW
WW
WWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWW
W
WW
WWWWW
WW
WWW
WWWWW
WWW
WWW
WWW
WWW
WW
WWW
WWW
WW
WWW
WW
WW
WWWWWWWWWW
W
WWW
W WW WW WWW WWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWW
WWW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WWW
WW
WWWWW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WWW
WWW
WW
WWWWWW
WWW
WW
WWW
WWWWW
WWWWW
WWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWW
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XWW
W
WWWWW WWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WWWW WWW WWWWWWW WWWWWWW WWW
WWWWW WWWWWWW
WW
WW
WW
WW
WWW
WWWWW
WWWWW
WWWWW
WWWW
WWW
WWW
WW
W
WW
WWW
WW
WW
WW
W
WWWWWWWW
WWWW
WW
WWW
WW
WWW
WW
WWWWW
WW
WW
WW
WWWWW
WW
WWW
WWW
WWW
W
WWW
WW
WWWWW
WWW
WWW
WWW
W
WWW
WW
WW
W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWW WWW WWW WWWWWWW WWW WWW WWW WWW WWWWWWW WWW W WWWW WWWWWWWWWWW
WW
WW
W
WWW
WW
WWW
WWW
WW
WW
WWWWWWWWW
WWWWW
WW
WW
WWWWW
W
WWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWW
FMFM
FM
SSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS
SSSS
SSSS
SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSS SS SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSSSSSSSS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SSSS SSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSSSS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SSSS
SS
SSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
PHASE
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
N O R T H
ROAD
A
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE NORTH
140
SITE
HERMITAGE RD
OPEN SPACEREQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 807.6 AC (20% X 4038 AC)PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 3,089.81 AC TOTAL PHASE 1;± 3,072.46 AC WETLANDS, ±17.35 ACAMENITY IN PHASE 1 (76.5% OF SITE)INCLUDES AMENITY, WETLANDS);NHC'S COD CONSERVATION AREAPRESERVED AS PART OF OPEN SPACE
PARKING REQUIREMENTSALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WILL HAVE ON LOT PARKING FOR 2 OR MORE CARS
AMENITY:TOTAL REQUIRED: NO REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN UDOTOTAL PROVIDED: 171 SPACES
RA PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL DIMENSIONAL DATA:SITE DIMENSIONS PER PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDSMULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PER RA ZONING DISTRICTPERIMETER SETBACK: 20' MIN; ALL LOCATIONS WILL EXCEED THIS BUFFERBUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 40' HT MAX.BUILDING SEPARATION 10' MIN.FRONT SETBACK: 5' MINSIDE SETBACK: 5' MINREAR SETBACK: 10' MIN.
LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES1. STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG CASTLE HAYNE ROAD THE NEW HANOVER COUNTYUDO2. THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY WATER AND WETLANDS ON 3 SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.VEGETATION WILL REMAIN IN THESE AREAS WITH SELECTIVE CLEARING TO REMOVE DEAD/DYINGMATERIAL AND MAINTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR TO CREEKS AND RIVER AS WELL AS PROMOTE WATERACCESS WHERE POSSIBLE.3. BUFFERS TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WILL FAR EXCEED MINIMUM AMOUNT REQUIRED. THEWIDTH VARIED, BUT WILL INCORPORATE EXISTING VEGETATION AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPE ASNEEDED.
SITE INFORMATIONPROJECT LOCATION: SLEDGE ROAD AT CASTLE HAYNE ROADCASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
PROPERTY OWNERS: SJM HILTON, LLC BFM HILTON, LLC ESW HILTON, LLC DSF HILTON, LLC JFM HILTON, LLC
PARCEL PINS &DEED BK: R00900-001-001-000 (23.01 AC)R00900-001-002-000 (23.01 AC)D.B. 6486, PG. 1782
TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: ± 4,038 ACRESSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ± 4038 MAX UNITS ALLOWED BY-RIGHTPHASE 1 TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS :230 LOTS PROPOSED THIS PHASE 1
CURRENT ZONING: RA PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIALFUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: COMMUNITY MIXED USE, RURAL RESIDENTIAL, CONSERVATION
FLOOD INFORMATION: PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE AE 8 BFE AND ZONE X– MINIMAL FLOOD RISK – AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBERS 3720320200K,3720321000K, 3720321100K, 3720321200K, 3720322000K, 3720322100K, 3720322200K,3720323100K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007.
WETLAND: INFORMATION: A WETLAND DELINEATION PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING AND IS IN THE REVIEWPROCESS.
SIDEWALKS1. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO. ALLPROJECT ROADS IN RIGHTS OF WAY SHALL HAVE A 5' WIDE SIDEWALK, MINIMUM, ON ONE SIDE OF THEROAD.
WASTE DISPOSALWASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE INDIVIDUAL CARTS AT RESIDENCES EXCEPT DUMPSTERS AT AMENITY CAMPUS..THIS LOCATION HAS BEEN NOTED ON THE PLAN. ALL TRASH-HANDLING AND RELATED EQUIPMENT SHALLBE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED AND SCREENED WITH AN OPAQUE FENCE OR WALL. THE ENCLOSURE SHALLBE AT LEAST ONE (1) FOOT TALLER THAN THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TRASH RECEPTACLE.
DEVELOPMENT NOTES:1. REFER TO DEVELOPMENT'S MASTER PLAN FOR FULL PHASING INFORMATION.
2. PHASE 1 INCLUDES 4 NEIGHBORHOOD SECTIONS AND THE MAIN AMENITY CAMPUS.
3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING WILL BE ALIGNED WITH PENDING PHASED TIA WITH NO MORE THAN 100 HOMES PROPOSED FORCONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO A SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD BEING INSTALLED. DEVELOPER WILL WORK WITH NHC FIREMARSHAL'S OFFICE TO FURTHER IDENTIFY TIMING AND CONSTRUCTION OF ENTRANCE ROAD.
4. ALL PROJECT ROADS WILL BE PRIVATE, BUILT TO NEW HANOVER COUNTY PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.
5. SOME NEIGHBORHOODS MAY BE GATED. ALL WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH SIREN ACTIVATED OR KNOX BOX/LOCK EQUIPMENTAND WILL BE APPROVED BY NHC FIRE STAFF PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
6. ALL FUTURE PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND PERMITTING.
7. MASTER DECLARATIONS AND COVENANTS WILL BE DEVELOPED AND FILED WITH NHC.
8. AMENITY CAMPUS WILL BE PHASED WITH THE PRIMARY CLUBHOUSE AND SALES OFFICE DEVELOPED IN THIS FIRST PHASE OFDEVELOPMENT.
9. ALL EXTERIOR SIGNS TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.6 OF THE UDO.
10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.5 OF THE UDO.
11. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS IN PROGRESS AND ALL NCDOT/ WMPO APPROVED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS WILL BEINSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER IN THE SEQUENCE DETERMINED BY THE FINAL TIA APPROVAL.
12. THE SITE'S UPLANDS ARE IN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT BY PREVIOUS OWNER. AS SUCH, NO SPECIMEN TREES WERE FOUNDIN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT UPLAND AREAS; ALL OTHER TREES IN WETLANDS, ETC. WILL BE PRESERVED.. A TREEREMOVAL PERMIT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY SIGNIFICANT/REGULATED TRESS REQUIRING REMOVAL OR MITIGATION.
12. CFPUA TO SUPPLY WATER AND SEWER. DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT UTILITY EXTENSIONS TO SERVE PROPERTY.
24' DRIVE AISLE18' PARKING STALL 18' PARKING STALL
FINISHED GRADE
1.5'1.5'
6"6"
24" CURB GUTTER
STD.ASPHALTPAVEMENT
1.0% 1.0%
SLE
D
G
E
R
D
CRO
W
A
T
A
N
R
D
CAST
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
MCD
O
U
G
A
L
D
DR
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
GE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
PHASE LINE
ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
FIRE LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
STREETLIGHT
LEGEND
55
W W W W
SS SS SS
FIRE FIRE
5' CONCRETESIDEWALK;SEE PLAN FORLOCATIONS
APPLIES TO AMENITY PARKING
20' ON WAY OR 24' TWO WAY
DRIVEWAY1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
1'
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONEUNDER CURBING
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
5'1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILSDATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVINGSECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THEAVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
24' PRIVATE ROAD
1/2" PER FT1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
1'
50' PRIVATE R/W
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONEUNDER CURBING
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
7'12'5'1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILSDATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVINGSECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THEAVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
VARIES
1/2" PER FT1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
SLOPES= 3:1
1'
VARIABLE WIDTH PRIVATE R/W
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONEUNDER CURBING1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
VARIES VARIES1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILSDATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVINGSECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THEAVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
5' WIDE SIDEWALK
VARIES 11'11'
6" STANDARD CURBFOR MEDIAN
2'2'
DRIVEWAY
5' SIDEWALK; SEEPLAN FORLOCATION
5'SIDEWALK;SEE PLANFORLOCATION
1/4" PER FT
11'
26' COLLECTOR ROAD
CONNECTION TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TOUSE EXISTING WETLAND CROSSING TYP;NOT IN THIS PHASE
20' WIDE X 70' DEEP TEMPORARY FIRETURNAROUND UNTIL FUTURE ROADCONNECTIONS ARE CONSTRUCTED, TYP.
EXISTING VEGETATED AREA OUTSIDE OFWETLANDS TO BE USED FOR NATURETRAILS WHEN POSSIBLE & LINK TOCOMMUNITY-WIDE SIDEWALK/ TRAILSYSTEM; LOCATIONS MAY VARY, TYP.
LOTS 1-15 MODEL HOMES
MAIL KIOSK WITH PULL-OFF, TYP.
LARGE ESTATE LOTS RANGE IN SIZE FROM +±0.5 - 2 AC LOTS, TYP.
ALL LOTS IN PHASE 1 ARE MIXEDSTREETSCAPES WITH LOT WIDTHS VARYINGFROM 40' WIDE TO 70' WIDE; LOT DEPTHSVARY FROM 115' - 135' DEEP. SMALLEST LOTAREA: 4,600 SF, LARGEST LOT AREA: + 2 ACSEE MASTER PLAN FOR BREAKDOWN
WETLAND AND STREAM CORRIDOR ANDOPEN SPACE EITHER SIDE PROVIDE NATUREPARK AS DIVISION BETWEEN PHASE 1 ANDFUTURE PHASE 3
POTENTIAL JURISDICTION AL DITCH PERSEGI WETLAND DELINEATION; IMPACTS AREMINIMIZED TO ALL WETLANDS, DITCHES ANDSTREAMS; ALL REMAIN UNLESS SHOWNOTHERWISE AS ROAD CROSSINGS
STORMWATER POND, TYP.
FUTURE SLEDGE ROAD EXTENSION
END OF SLEDGE ROAD PHASE 1
COMMUNITY PARK AND TRAIL HEAD
ENTRY PARKING AREA FOR GATEHOUSE
GUARDHOUSE & MAIN RESIDENTIALNEIGHBORHOOD GATES
PRIVATE DRIVE PULLING HOMES OFF MAINCOLLECTOR ROAD THROUGH COMMUNITY
ROAD
B
ROAD
C
ALL
E
Y
1
SLED
G
E
R
O
A
D
50' P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
ROA
D
D
ROAD
E
ROAD
F
ROA
D
G
RO
A
D
H
ROAD
I
ROAD
J
RO
A
D
E
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR ALONG MAINENTRANCE ROADWAY
171 PARKING SPACES FOR AMENITYCAMPUS AND SALES OFFICE
PHASE 1 AMENITY CLUBHOUSE & SALESOFFICE TO BE CONSTRUCTED; FUTUREBUILDINGS AND RECREATION AREAS TOFOLLOW IN FUTURE PHASES; TOTALAMENITY CAMPUS + 17 ACRES
WETLANDS, TYP.
PHASE 1 POOL
DROP OFF AND SHORT-TERM PARKING
INDIAN
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
ADJACENT EXISTING SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL, TYP.
EXISTING VEGETATED WETLAND BUFFERALONG BROADWATER BRANCH TO REMAIN.ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AROUND AMENITYMAY BE ADDED TO INCREASE BUFFERWHERE NEEDED; BUFFER WIDTH VARIESFROM 50' - 300'+
ROAD CONNECTION TO FUTURE PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT
23355.PE
CO
P
P
E
R
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
,
L
L
C
DA
T
E
:
SC
A
L
E
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
PEI JOB#:
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
FIN
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
DR
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SEAL
CL
I
E
N
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
-
P
H
A
S
E
1
C-2.0
09.
0
3
.
2
4
1"
=
2
0
0
'
AH
E
AH
E
JR
B
GEOGRID OR GRAVEL ROAD BASECONSTRUCTED TO HANDLE EMERGENCYVEHICLES UP TO 86,000 LBS
SUBGRADE, MINIMAL COMPACTION
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
NOTE: THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PORTION OFSECONDARY ACCESS ROAD THROUGH WOODEDAREA COULD BE GEOGRID WITH GRAVEL
TOP WITH SOIL AND SOD TO MAKEREINFORCED ROAD EDGE BLEND INTOLANDSCAPE; MARKINGS TO INDICATEROAD LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BYNHC FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE PRIOR TOINSTALLATION
FUTURE RESORTSTYLE POOL
0
SCALE:
600'400'200'
1"=200'
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
BOX CULVERT
18' UNIMP
R
O
V
E
D
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
R
O
A
D
NCS
R
2
1
0
6
-
M
C
D
O
U
G
A
L
D
D
R
I
V
E
60'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
M.B.
1
9
,
P
G
.
5
XX
XX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XX
X
OHE OHE OHE OHE
WETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WETWET WET WETWETWET WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWET WET WET WET WETWETWET
WET
WE WETWETWETWET
WETWET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWET WET WET WETWETWET
WET
WET WETWET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET WETWET WETWET
WETWET
WETWET
WETWETWET WET WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
PHASE
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHAS
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
FUTUREDEVELOPMENT
PARK
FUTUREDEVELOPMENT
PHAS
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
PHASE 2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
WWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWW
WWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWW
WWW
WWW
WWWWW
WWW
WWW
WWWWW
WWW
WWW
WWW
WWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWW WWWWW WWW WWWWW WWW WWW WWW WW W WW WWW WWW WW WWW WWW WW WWW WWW WWW WWWWW WWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WWW
WW
WW
WW
WW
W
WWWWWWW
W
WWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWWWW
FUTUREDEVELOPMENT
FUTUREDEVELOPMENT
HE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
14'09
"
E
22'L13 S 71°29'
2
1
"
E
84.35'S 61
°
1
9
'
2
0
"
E
85.9
3
'
92.
2
7
'
S
4
2
°
4
1
'
3
4
"
E
88
.
0
0
'
C1
N 59
°
1
1
'
3
7
"
W
-
3
6
1
.
8
1
'
(
T
O
T
A
L
)
240.
6
3
'
BOX C
U
L
V
E
R
T
ACCESS EASEMENTD.B. 6486, PG. 1782
121.
1
8
'
ACCESS & DRAINAGE EASEMENTSD.B. 806, PG. 729D.B. 856, PG. 800
S
4
7
°
2
3
'
0
4
"
E
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FM
FM
FM
FM FM FM
FM FM FM FM FM FM
FM FM
FM FM
FM FM FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
N O R T H
0
SCALE:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
PHASE LINE
ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
FIRE LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
STREETLIGHT
LEGEND
55
W W W W
SS SS SS
FIRE FIRE
1"=200'
200' 400' 600'
SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD CONNECTING TO DEKKER RD; SIREN OR KNOX BOX GATED ROADFOR EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY; DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL TODESIGN TO COUNTY AND STATE STANDARDS; SEE DETAIL SHEET C-2.0
N O R T H
MAIN PROJECT ACCESSROAD; REALIGN EXISTINGSLEDGE ROAD; CONSTRUCTTO COUNTY ROADSTANDARDS
EXISTING SLEDGE ROAD IMPROVED WITHIN EXISTING ACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENT; ROAD WILL BE DESIGNED & CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITHPENDING NCDOT REVIEW/APPROVAL OF TIA
ENTRY MEDIAN WITH MONUMENT SIGN OUTSIDE OF CASTLE HAYNE RIGHT OF WAY
ENTRY MONUMENT STRUCTURE & SIGN WITH LANDSCAPESURROUNDING; PERMITTED SEPARATELY
SLEDGE ROAD REALIGNED WITHIN A NATURAL & LANDSCAPED CORRIDOR
SIREN OR KNOX BOX GATES SO NO THROUGH TRAFFIC USES SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD.
PRIMARY COMMUNITY ACCESS - SLEDGE ROAD AT CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 60'
ENTRY MONUMENT STRUCTURE & SIGN WITH LANDSCAPESURROUNDING; PERMITTED SEPARATELY
UTILITY EXTENSIONS ANTICIPATED THESE LOCATIONS; PENDING CFPUAREVIEW AND COORDINATION
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR SITE MAIN ENTRANCE INCLUDES FULLMOVEMENT INGRESS, DEDICATED LEFT & RIGHT TURN LANES; TIAAPPROVAL WILL DICTATE FINAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND NCDOTWILL REVIEW AND APPROVAL DRIVEWAY DESIGN
SLED
G
E
R
O
A
D
50' P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
SLE
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
50' P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
100'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
100'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
DE
K
K
E
R
R
D
60
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
BERG LN60' PUBLIC
R
O
W
DIRCK R
D
.
10' WIDE NON-MUNICIPAL UTILITY EASEMENT EITHER SIDE OF ALL RIGHTOF WAYS THIS DEVELOPMENT EXCEPT IN NARROW PART OF SLEDGEROAD ENTRANCE BETWEEN GE AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD
23355.PE
CO
P
P
E
R
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
,
L
L
C
DA
T
E
:
SC
A
L
E
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
PEI JOB#:
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
FIN
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
DR
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SEAL
CL
I
E
N
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
-
P
H
A
S
E
1
C-2.1
09.
0
3
.
2
4
1"
=
2
0
0
'
AH
E
AH
E
JR
B
STREETLIGHT, TYP.
MAIN RESIDENTIALENTRANCE, TYP.
IMPROVED &REALIGNED SLEDGEROAD, TYP.
LANDSCAPE BUFFER &TRAIL AREA BETWEEN ROWAND PROPERTY LINE
SHARED PROPERTY LINEWITH GE
WETLANDS ALONG EXISTING CREEK
PHASE LINE, TYP.
EXISTING OLDPOWERLINEEASEMENT TO BEABANDONED IFTHIS AREADEVELOPED INFUTURE
FUTURE RESIDENT'S ACCESS; GATED
MAIN ENTRANCEGATEHOUSE,, TYP.
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: Sledge Road at Castle Hayne Road – Hilton Bluffs Master Plan
Comments:
• A TIA will be required prior to additional comments being provided.
• 4,031 dwelling units noted on the site plan and was the number utilized for trip
generation.
NCDOT Projects:
• U-5863: NC 133/Castle Hayne Road widening from I-140/US 17 bypass to SR
1310/Division Drive. This project is currently unfunded but, is scheduled to occur within a
mile of the site location.
• I-6037: pavement and bridge rehabilitation on I-140 from US 421 to I-40 schedule for
construction in 2028 and will occur within a mile of the site location.
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: Based on the 11th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual, a TIA is required. A scoping
document must be submitted to Abby Lorenzo (abby.lorenzo@wilmingtonnc.gov) to begin the
TIA process.
Land Use (ITE Code) Intensity Unit 24 Hour
Volumes
AM Peak
Hour Trips
PM Peak
Hour Trips
Single Family Detached
Housing (210) 4,031 DUs 30,261 2,153 3,209
Boat and RV Storage – 310 Metro Circle – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Tim Littlejohn, Spartan Construction Management LLC
From: Zach Dickerson, Senior Planner
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC
PID#: R02300-002-032-000
Egov# SITECN-24-000036
Subject: 310 Metro Circle – RV and Boat Storage - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Zach Dickerson 910-798-7450
1. General Comments
a. Zoning is I-2, use is by-right in the I-2 district
b. I went ahead and included the page showing the parking layout in the document with the
rest of the site plan.
c. Will there be an employee/security on-site?
d. Per Bill Wilder with Duke Energy, the large easement on the site will prevent the site from
being developed as planned on this site plan. Please confirm with Mr. Wilder on how to
proceed with the development of this site.
2. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. If there is intended to be an employee on site, where will they park?
3. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. Please note that no building permit for any structure shall be issued which requires
NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the permit approval.
Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for building permit.
Boat and RV Storage – 310 Metro Circle – TRC Review
Page | 2
4. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. It does not appear that there are any trees on the site- please confirm.
b. If there are any trees to be removed on site, please apply for a tree removal permit.
5. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. The UDO requires 15 trees to be planted or preserved per acre disturbed. Because there
are no trees on site to retain, they will need to be planted somewhere on site.
b. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for street yard plantings.
6. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Is any lighting planned for this site?
b. If so, please submit a lighting plan for this site- it is not required prior to TRC approval but
will be required to other permits being issued.
7. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. For any signs on the site, please submit for a sign permit, referencing Section 5.6 of the
UDO for standards.
8. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. Per the New Hanover County Conservation Resource map, there are no Conservation
Resources on the property.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Fire Finals Required
2. Portable fire extinguisher requirement per NCFPA 10
3. Install a fire hydrant on the roadway within 250 feet of the project. At the gate if possible across
the street from the gate is also allowable.
4. Get permission to store vehicles, boats, campers, etc. under the power lines from Duke Energy
or the owner of the power line. Present letter to TRC.
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
Boat and RV Storage – 310 Metro Circle – TRC Review
Page | 3
2. The NHC stormwater ordinance is not applicable as the site has a master stormwater permit. A
plan revision consisting of a site plan and applicable calculations for stormwater conveyance, if
proposed, will be required.
3. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a modification
to SW8 001005 permit with will be required.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Septic and well review is not necessary since there are no structures proposed on this parcel.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. No comments.
NHC Soil & Water, Brian Dadson 910-798-7138
1. See attachment.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. CFPUA water available.
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. No comments
WMPO, Greer Templer 910-341-0107
1. See attachment.
Army Corps of Engineers, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611
1. No comments.
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Rachel Capito
Boat and RV Storage – 310 Metro Circle – TRC Review
Page | 4
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Metro Circle - 310 - RV and Boat Storage
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE
COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Kureb sand (Kr).
According to the booklet, “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for
Septic Tank Suitability, Kureb are Class I soils.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kureb as excessively well drained.
Kureb are on the Hydric Soils “B” list which means there may be areas of wetland
included in the mapping units. An adequate drainage and maintenance plan is needed
for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state
jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible
wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with
State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover
County, North
Carolina
Metro Circle - 310 - RV and Boat
Storage
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................13
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes.......................................................13
References............................................................................................................15
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
37
9
8
1
3
0
37
9
8
1
6
0
37
9
8
1
9
0
37
9
8
2
2
0
37
9
8
2
5
0
37
9
8
2
8
0
37
9
8
1
3
0
37
9
8
1
6
0
37
9
8
1
9
0
37
9
8
2
2
0
37
9
8
2
5
0
37
9
8
2
8
0
225880 225910 225940 225970 226000 226030 226060 226090 226120
225850 225880 225910 225940 225970 226000 226030 226060 226090 226120
34° 17' 23'' N
77
°
5
8
'
4
1
'
'
W
34° 17' 23'' N
77
°
5
8
'
3
0
'
'
W
34° 17' 17'' N
77
°
5
8
'
4
1
'
'
W
34° 17' 17'' N
77
°
5
8
'
3
0
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,270 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Kr Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
3.2 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 3.2 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr7
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Kureb and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kureb
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces, rims on carolina bays
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 26 inches: sand
C/Bh - 26 to 89 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 1.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
15
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: 310 Metro Circle - RV and Boat Storage
NCDOT Projects:
• I-6037: pavement and bridge rehabilitation on I-140 from US 421 to I-40 schedule for
construction in 2028 and will occur within a mile of the site location.
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: Based on the 11th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual, a TIA is not required.
Land Use (ITE Code) Intensity Unit 24 Hour
Volumes
AM Peak
Hour Trips
PM Peak
Hour Trips
Marina (420) 76 Berths 183 9 15
*Per NCDOT Division 3 Traffic Unit
Reagan Retail – 5901 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Robert Reagan, Jr. Reagan LLC
From: Zach Dickerson
Senior Planner
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC
PID#: R01109-001-001-000
Egov# SITECN-24-000038
Subject: 5901 Castle Hayne Road –Reagan Retail - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 02, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Zach Dickerson 910-798-7450
1. General Comments
a. Zoning is B-2
b. Proposed use of retail and general office, allowed by right.
2. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. Parking is sufficient per the use. Thanks for including parking space size details.
b. As of June 17, 2024, any development requiring 25 or more parking spaces is required to
run conduit for Electric Vehicle Parking.
i. This is required for 20% of parking spaces, capping at 15 spaces.
ii. 66 parking spaces are shown on the site plan, 20% is 13 spaces.
iii. Please show on the site plan the 13 spaces to which the conduit will be run.
iv. Please note: Electric Vehicle Charging Stations are not required for developments
in New Hanover County- only conduit.
Reagan Retail – 5901 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 2
3. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. Please note that no building permit for any structure shall be issued which requires
NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the permit approval.
Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for building permit.
4. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. For the trees planned to be removed on site, please apply for a Tree Removal Permit.
b. Please refer to UDO Section 5.3 for Tree Retention Standards.
5. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. Landscaping calculations look good.
b. Please detail types of trees to be planted in street yard and parking lot landscaping.
c. Please detail what type of Opaque buffer will be used, be it all vegetation, berm and
vegetation or fencing and vegetation.
d. Detailing numbers of trees to be planted in street yard or parking lot landscaping will
confirm if the 15 trees planted/retained per acre disturbed requirement is met.
6. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Please note that a lighting plan is not required for TRC approval, but will be required prior
to issuance of construction plan approvals.
b. Please refer to UDO Section 5.5 for Lighting Standards.
7. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. For any signs on the site, please submit for a sign permit, referencing Section 5.6 of the
UDO for standards.
8. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. Per the New Hanover County Conservation Resource map, there are no Conservation
Resources on this property.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Fire Finals required.
2. Portable Fire Extinguishers per NFPA 10
3. Section 510 Study Required- Emergency First Responder Radio coverage
4. Sprinkler & Fire Alarm permitting required.
Reagan Retail – 5901 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 3
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
2. A County stormwater permit issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit applications documentation with requisite review fees to the COAST online
permit portal (https://newhanovercountync-
energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home). Applicable forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/251/Stormwater however the application form is not required as the
information will be gathered by the COAST portal.
3. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a high density
permit will be obtained.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site plan reflects connection to public water & sewer. Infrastructure must maintain setbacks to
septic systems located at 3913 and 3909 Lynn Ave.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. Suites will need unit addresses. Please contact planning for addresses following TRC approval.
NHC Soil & Water, Brian Dadson 910-798-7138
1. See attachment.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. CFPUA water and sewer available. Per CFPUA ordinance and design manual, Corner lots are
required to extend the main along the frontage of each road.
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. See attachment.
Reagan Retail – 5901 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 4
WMPO, Greer Templer 910-341-0107
1. See attachment.
Army Corps of Engineers, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611
1. No comment
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Rachel Capito
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Reagan Retail - 5901 Castle Hayne Road
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Kenansville fine sand (Ke) and
Lynchburg fine sand (Ls).
According to the booklet, “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for
Septic Tank Suitability”, Kenansville is a Class I soils and Lynchburg is a Class II soils.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kenansville as well drained and Lynchburg as somewhat poorly drained.
Lynchburg is on the Hydric Soils “B” list, which means it may contain areas of wetland. It should be noted, according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover County, the
limitation for dwellings with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for all the soils on this site. The limitations are due to flooding
and/or wetness. An adequate drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state
jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover
County, North
Carolina
Reagan Retail - 5901 Castle
Hayne Road
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................13
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.......................................13
Ls—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods..............................................................................................14
References............................................................................................................16
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
0
5
4
1
0
38
0
5
4
3
0
38
0
5
4
5
0
38
0
5
4
7
0
38
0
5
4
9
0
38
0
5
5
1
0
38
0
5
5
3
0
38
0
5
3
9
0
38
0
5
4
1
0
38
0
5
4
3
0
38
0
5
4
5
0
38
0
5
4
7
0
38
0
5
4
9
0
38
0
5
5
1
0
38
0
5
5
3
0
233140 233160 233180 233200 233220 233240 233260 233280 233300 233320 233340
233120 233140 233160 233180 233200 233220 233240 233260 233280 233300 233320 233340
34° 21' 24'' N
77
°
5
4
'
5
'
'
W
34° 21' 24'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
7
'
'
W
34° 21' 19'' N
77
°
5
4
'
5
'
'
W
34° 21' 19'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
7
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 45 90 180 270
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,020 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ke Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
1.1 40.3%
Ls Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes, Atlantic
Coast Flatwoods
1.6 59.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 2.7 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ls—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx8k
Elevation: 0 to 100 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 64 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 310 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils:82 percent
Minor components:18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform:Marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 13 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 45 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 45 to 63 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153AY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153BY040NC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit:8 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY040NC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces,
carolina bays on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip, talf
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rains, drained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces,
carolina bays on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip, talf
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
16
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Reagan Retail & Office Center – 5901 Castle Hayne Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• It is recommended that you reach out to the NCDOT District Office prior to
submitting plans to avoid a redesign of the proposed utilities.
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Site Plan Comments:
Hydraulic calculations and associated plan sheets will need to be submitted for the site.
• This will be reviewed by the NCDOT Hydraulics Unit.
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
• No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
• A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed
driveway crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
Label the internal protection stem length for the proposed driveway connection.
• Measured from the right-of-way line.
Parking Lot Design:
• It is recommended that the first 2-3 parking spaces at the ingress on Castle Hayne
Road be removed as this will negatively impact traffic flow.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGHT T R IANGLE
10 ' BY 70 'S I GHT T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENTMIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
SID
E
W
A
L
K
MH
25'25'
P
U
B
L
I
C
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
DB
.
4
3
1
8
/
P
G
.
0
3
1
3
PROP. PARKING
24 PECAN
INV.15.66'
INV.15.60'24
"
R
C
P
<=1
5
"
R
C
P
INV. OUT=13.45'
INV.IN=15.35'
<=
1
8
"
R
C
P
SE
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
=
>
INV.OUT=14.67' (N)INV.IN=14.74' (S)RIM=17.52'SSMH D/WGRAV.
D/WCONC.
TT
T
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
4"
E
I
P
-
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
25.00'
100
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
N.
C
.
H
W
Y
1
3
3
n/fCIRCLE K STORES INCBK 6634, PG 1085Zoning: B-2Use: VACANT
n/f JEFFREY SUTTON HEIRS ETALBK 9908, PG 0318Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fTONI L SUTTONBK 5240, PG 0048Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fMCCLURE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIANBK 1708, PG 0544Zoning: B-2Use: CHURCH
n/f NEFTALI BALDERAMA GARCIABK 6283, PG 2899Zoning: RAUse: Single Family Residence
n/fHILLSBOROUGH STREET LLCBK 6472, PG 1344Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fCAROLINE L. BORDEAUXBK 3665, PG 0818Zoning: RAUse: Single Family Residence
n/fSIMON P PARKINBK 1536, PG 2092Zoning: B-2Use: Single Family Residence
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17 17 17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20
20
20
EXISTINGBUILDING
C-0 1
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
,
T
R
E
E
RE
M
O
V
A
L
/
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
DE
M
O
L
I
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
1" = 30'
PROPERTY LINEADJOINERSTREE PROTECTION FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TREES TO BE REMOVED
LEGEND
REVISIONS
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING NUMBER:
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET SIZE:
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE):
2024-007
CLIENT INFORMATION:Reagan, LLC303 Fox Lake Dr.Clinton, NC 28328
OF 7
JAE
CDC
CDC
24x36
8/29/2024
RE
A
G
A
N
R
E
T
A
I
L
A
N
D
OF
F
I
C
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
PREL
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
DRA
W
I
N
G
D
O
N
O
T
U
S
E
FOR
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SITE
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
CASTLE AVE.
HOLLY SHELTER RD.
SITE DATA
PARCEL ID: R01109-001-001-000
CURRENT ZONING: B-2
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5901 CASTLE HAYNE RD.CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
CURRENT OWNER: REAGAN LLC303 FOX LAKE DR. CLINTON, NC 28328
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROJECT BOUNDARY 75,707 S.F. (± 1.74 ac.)
EXISTING ONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS: (SITE IS VACANT)
SOILS TYPE: Ke (Kenansville fine sand)Ls (Lynchburg fine sandy loam)(Per NHC GIS Soil Map)
NOTES:1. ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY LANDDEVELOPMENT CODE.2. PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE & NEW HANOVER COUNTYREGULATIONS.3. EXISTING SURVEYING PERFORMED BY STEVEN L. BUIE, PLS, L-3402.4. SITE IS LOCATED IN ZONE "X" PER FRIS ON FIRM MAP NUMBER370168 3232 K,EFFECTIVE DATE FEBRUARY 16, 2007.5. NO WETLANDS, SURFACE WATERS, PROTECTED VEGETATED SETBACKS OR RIPARIANBUFFERS EXIST ON SITE.6. PRIOR TO CLEARING, GRADING, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ANY WELLS THAT AREEXISTING MUST BE PROTECTED AROUND EACH WELL HEAD/CASING AND CAPPED.7. ALL PINE TREES ARE ASSUMED TO BE LOBLOLLY PINES. ALL GUM TREES AREASSUMED TO BE SWEET GUMS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SPECIES PRIOR TO CUTTING.
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES:1. PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING, GRADING, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, APPROVED TREEPROTECTION FENCING, SUCH AS SAFETY BARRIER FENCING, A WOODEN SLAT SNOWFENCE OR WIRE FENCE, SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND PROTECTED TREES OR TREESTANDS LOCATED IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS OR OTHER SITE AREAS THAT WILL BEDISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FENCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OFFOUR FEET IN HEIGHT AND BE OF DURABLE CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTIVEFENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.2. NO CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, TOOLS, MATERIALS, OR VEHICLES ARE PERMITTEDWITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING.3. IF AN EXISTING TREE RETAINED TO COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS OF THIS SECTIONIS DESTROYED, SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED, OR DIES AS A RESULT OF NEGLIGENCE ONTHE PART OF THE PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION, THEN REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ON THE SITE WITHA TOTAL DIAMETER EQUAL TO TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE RETAINED TREE. AMINIMUM GROWING AREA OF 144 SQUARE FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACHREPLACEMENT TREE. IF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR DETERMINES IT IS INFEASIBLE ORFOR REPLACEMENT TREE(S) TO BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE SITE, THEN A PAYMENTMAY BE MADE TO THE COUNTY’S TREE IMPROVEMENT FUND EQUIVALENT TO THEPRICING STANDARDS IN THE COUNTY FEE SCHEDULE.
60'30'15'30'0'
Scale: 1"=30'
MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR REMOVAL OFSIGNIFICANT TREES
QTY SIZE TYPE
REPLACEMENTINCHES236"PINE 144.00
128" PINE56.00
126" OAK52.00
TOTAL REPLACEMENT INCHES 252
CREDITS FOR PRESERVED TREES
QTY DBH INCHES TYPE DOCUMENTEDINCHES SIGNIFICANTINCHES CREDITS
1 26" PINE 26 0.00124"PECAN 24 0.00136"OAK 36 0.00
121" OAK 210.00
118" OAK 180.00
1 15"OAK 15 22.50
212" OAK24 36.00
1 11"OAK 11 16.50
1 8" OAK 8 12.00
1 16" PINE 16 24.00
TOTAL INCHES PRESERVEDTREES 74 39
TOTAL CREDITS FOR PRESERVEDTREES 111.0
22
8' S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
15
EXIT ONLY - ONE WAY
24
'
18'
24'
R25'
18'STAIR
STAIR
10' X 70' NCDOT SIGHTTRIANGLE (TYP.)
15'
10'395
510
430
460
515
37.5'
10
'
(
T
Y
P
)
18' (TYP)
9'
9'
9'
MH
25'25
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
DB
.
4
3
1
8
/
P
G
.
0
3
1
3
12.5'430
24
'
R30'
R3
0
'
R25
'
10' X 70' NCDOT SIGHTTRIANGLE (TYP.)
R
2
5
'
R25'
24
'
15
6' SIDEWALK
24 PECAN
INV.15.66'
INV.15.60'
24"
R
C
P
<=
1
5
"
R
C
P
INV. OUT=13.45'
INV.IN=15.35'
<=
1
8
"
R
C
P
SE
W
E
R
L
I
N
E
=
>
INV.OUT=14.67' (N)INV.IN=14.74' (S)RIM=17.52'SSMH D/WGRAV.
D/WCONC.
TT
T
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
100
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
N.C
.
H
W
Y
1
3
3
n/fCIRCLE K STORES INCBK 6634, PG 1085Zoning: B-2Use: VACANT
n/f JEFFREY SUTTON HEIRS ETALBK 9908, PG 0318Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fTONI L SUTTONBK 5240, PG 0048Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fMCCLURE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIANBK 1708, PG 0544Zoning: B-2Use: CHURCH
n/f NEFTALI BALDERAMA GARCIABK 6283, PG 2899Zoning: RAUse: Single Family Residence
n/fHILLSBOROUGH STREET LLCBK 6472, PG 1344Zoning: B-2Use: COMMERCIAL
n/fCAROLINE L. BORDEAUXBK 3665, PG 0818Zoning: RAUse: Single Family Residence
n/fSIMON P PARKINBK 1536, PG 2092Zoning: B-2Use: Single Family Residence
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17 17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
2121
21
21
22
22
22
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20
20
20
6" SSCO(TYP)
6"
S
S
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
@
1
.
0
%
M
I
N
.
37.5'
PROP. BYPASS STRUCTURE(SEE DETAIL)
(1) 8"X6" TEE(1) 6" DELINEATION VALVE LOCATED 18" INSIDE R/W(1) 6" C-900 PVC PRIVATE FIRE LINE(1) 6" WATTS MODEL# LF957 RPDA
(2) 45° BENDS(1) 8"G.V.
2" WATER SERVICE (36" MIN. BURY)
R2
5
'
8" FIRE SERVICE (36" MIN. BURY)
(1) F.H. ASSY
F.D.C. LOCATED ON CORNER OF BUILDING
PROP. PUBLIC U.E.
10'
PPES
PPES
RC
P
PPESPPES
RCP
R25'
RCP
EXISTINGBUILDING
C-1 2
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
1" = 30'
SITE DATA
PARCEL ID: R01109-001-001-000
CURRENT ZONING: B-2
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5901 CASTLE HAYNE RD.CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
CURRENT OWNER: REAGAN LLC303 FOX LAKE DR. CLINTON, NC 28328
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROJECT BOUNDARY 75,707 S.F. (± 1.74 ac.)
PROPOSED USE: RETAIL (1st Floor) &GENERAL OFFICE (2nd Floor)
BUILDING SIZE: 26,400 S.F. GFA TOTAL (13,200 S.F. FOOTPRINT)
BUILDING HEIGHT: 2-STORY/ ±28'
CALCULATION FOR BUILDING COVERAGE:PROPOSED COVERAGE 13,200 S.F. ÷ 75,707 S.F. = 17.4%
BUILDING SETBACKS:
FRONT: REQUIRED= 25' PROPOSED= 79'SIDE: REQUIRED= 0' Interior/25' Street PROPOSED= 67' / 26'REAR: REQUIRED= 35' To Res. Use PROPOSED= 36'
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS:BUILDINGS 13,200 S.F.ASPHALT PARKING/DRIVE AREA 27,520 S.F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK, C.&G., ETC. 5,385 S.F.FUTURE 3,895 S.F.TOTAL 50,000 S.F (66.0%)
PARKING REQUIRED:RETAIL SALES USE: (2.5/1,000 sf)13,200 SF/1000*2.5 = 33 SPACES
GENERAL OFFICE USE: (2.5/1,000 sf)13,200 SF/1000*2.5 = 33 SPACES
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 66 SPACES (3 ADA)
PARKING PROVIDED: 66 SPACES (3 ADA)
PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPINGREQUIRED 27,520 S.F. * 8% 2,202 S.F.PROVIDED 2,740 S.F.
FOUNDATION PLANTINGS:
NORTH FACADE: 60 LF X 20' FACADE X 12%REQUIRED: 144 S.F.PROVIDED: 255 S.F.
EAST FACADE: 220 LF X 20' FACADE X 12%REQUIRED: 528 S.F.PROVIDED: 580 S.F.
STREETYARD CASTLE HAYNE RD.: (25 S.F./LF FRONTAGE. 12.5' MIN./37.5' MAX. WIDTHS)330 LF FRONTAGE 330- 25 LF DRIVEWAY = 305 LF FRONTAGEREQUIRED: 25' X 305 LF 7,625 S.F.PROVIDED: 7,758 S.F.
STREETYARD LYNN AVE.: (12.5 S.F./LF FRONTAGE. 6.25' MIN./18.75' MAX. WIDTHS)175 LF FRONTAGE 175- 19 LF DRIVEWAY = 156 LF FRONTAGEREQUIRED: 12.5' X 156 LF 1,950 S.F.PROVIDED: 2,030 S.F.
EXISTING SEWER AND WATER DEMAND: 0 GPD
PROPOSED SEWER AND WATER DEMAND: 2,420 GPD
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION (Per Trip Generation Manual):13,200 SF RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER (ITE CODE 820)AM PEAK: 13 PM PEAK: 49 DAILY: 567
13,200 SF GENERAL OFFICE (ITE CODE 710)AM PEAK: 20 PM PEAK: 19 DAILY: 143
PROJECT TOTAL: AM PEAK: 33 PM PEAK: 68 DAILY: 710
REVISIONS
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING NUMBER:
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET SIZE:
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE):
2024-007
CLIENT INFORMATION:Reagan, LLC
303 Fox Lake Dr.Clinton, NC 28328
OF 7
JAE
CDC
CDC
24x36
8/29/2024
RE
A
G
A
N
R
E
T
A
I
L
A
N
D
OF
F
I
C
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
PREL
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
DRA
W
I
N
G
D
O
N
O
T
U
S
E
FOR
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SITE
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
CASTLE AVE.
HOLLY SHELTER RD.
DEVELOPMENT NOTES:1. ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.2. PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE & NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGULATIONS.3. NO SIGNS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. ANY FUTURE PROPOSED SIGN IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 5.6. OF THE UDO.4. RUNOFF FROM ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, INCLUDING ROOF DRAINS, TO BE DIRECTED TO PROPOSED UNDERGROUNDINFILTRATION SYSTEM.
FIRE & SAFETY NOTES:1. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: II-B (COMMERCIAL)2. PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AN ALL-WEATHER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AT ALL TIMESDURING CONSTRUCTION.4. BUILDING INFORMATION SIGNS MUST BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "2018 NC FIRE CODE APPENDIXJ" REQUIREMENTS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH STUDY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS THATDEMONSTRATES THAT EXISTING EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO SIGNAL LEVELS MEET THEREQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 510 OF THE 2018 NC FIRE CODE.6. ANY DRIVEWAY GATE TO BE SIREN ACTIVATED AND HAVE KNOX KEY OVERRIDE.7.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE INSTALLED WITH 5 INCH STORZ QUICK CONNECTS ON A 4.5 INCH STEAMERIN COMPLIANCE WITH NHC FIRE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS.8. NO OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN 36" AROUND A FIRE HYDRANT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, STREETSIGNS, LANDSCAPING AND UTILITY POLES AND BOXES.9. NEW HYDRANTS MUST BE BROUGHT INTO SERVICE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS DELIVERED TO THEJOB SITE.10. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL PROVIDE A CLEAR VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 14 FEET INCLUDING TREES,CANOPIES, BRIDGES, ETC.11. DURING CONSTRUCTION, PREMISES IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED, AND MAY BE TEMPORARY IN NATUREPROVIDED IT IS LEGIBLE AND WEATHER RESISTANT.12. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED. ADDRESS NUMBERS ARE REQUIRED ON THE STREET SIDE. NUMBERSSHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 6 INCHES TALL AND ¾ INCHES WIDE, MUST BE WEATHER RESISTANT, AND CONTRASTIN COLOR AGAINST THEIR BACKGROUND.
PROPERTY LINERIGHT OF WAYEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEASEMENTPROPOSED WATERLINEPROPOSED FIRE LINEPROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINERUNOFF DIRECTION
SPOT ELEVATION
PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
STREETYARD LANDSCAPING
FOUNDATION PLANTINGS
LEGEND
25.5
60'30'15'30'0'
Scale: 1"=30'
UTILITY NOTES:1. EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES ARE CURRENTLYAVAILABLE TO THE SITE FROM CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITYAUTHORITY PUBLIC MAINS.2. ALL PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICES, SUCH AS ELECTRIC POWER, CATV,GAS & TELEPHONE SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.3. ALL WATER & SEWER UTILITIES TO BE INSTALLED PER CFPUATECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & STANDARDS.4. PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH CFPUA CROSS CONNECTION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS. WATER METER(S) CANNOT BE RELEASED UNTILALL REQUIREMENTS ARE MET AND N.C.D.E.N.R. HAS ISSUED THEIR"FINAL APPROVAL.". CALL 332-6558 FOR INFORMATION.5. ANY BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES REQUIRED BY THE CFPUAWILL NEED TO BE ON THE LIST OF APPROVED DEVICES BYUSCFCCCHR OR ASSE.6. IF CONTRACTOR DESIRES CFPUA WATER FOR CONSTRUCTION, HESHALL APPLY IN ADVANCE FOR THIS SERVICE AND MUST PROVIDE AREDUCED PRESSURE ZONE (RPZ) BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICEON THE DEVELOPER'S SIDE OF THE WATER METER BOX.7. WHEN PVC WATER MAINS AND SERVICES ARE PROPOSED, THE PIPESARE TO BE MARKED WITH NO. 10 INSULATED, SINGLE-STRANDCOPPER WIRE INSTALLED & STRAPPED TO THE PIPES WITH DUCTTAPE. THIS IS TO BE ACCESSIBLE IN ALL VALVES AND METER BOXESTO AID IN FUTURE LOCATION OF FACILITIES.8. SEWER GUARDS REQUIRED AT ALL MANHOLES. STAINLESS STEELSEWER GUARDS REQUIRED AT MANHOLES LOCATED IN TRAFFICAREAS.9. SERVICES SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO MAIN AND TERMINATE ATRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. SERVICES IN CUL-DE-SACS ARE REQUIRED TOBE PERPENDICULAR OR MUST ORIGINATE IN MANHOLE ANDTERMINATE AT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.10. ALL SERVICES TYING INTO DUCTILE IRON MAINS SHALL BECONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 50 D.I.P. WITH PROTECTO 401 CERAMICEPOXY LINING.11. MINIMUM 10' UTILITIES EASEMENT PROVIDED ALONG THEFRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS AND AS SHOWN FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS.12. NO FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS SHALL BE USED.13. ALL STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS SHALL BE 316.14. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION ANDPROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION.CALL NC811 AT 811 OR 1-800-632-4949. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ANY UTILITIES, CURB &GUTTER, PAVEMENT, ETC. THAT MAY BE BE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION. DAMAGED ITEMS SHALL BE REPAIRED TO ATLEAST THE QUALITY OR WORKMANSHIP FOUND IN THE ORIGINALITEM.15. THE PROCESS FOR TELEPHONE CABLE PLACEMENT: * FINAL GRADEWILL NEED TO BE ESTABLISHED. * POWER WILL PLACE THEIRCABLE FIRST - APPROXIMATELY 3' DEEP. * BELLSOUTH & CABLE TVWILL THEN PLACE THEIR CABLE AT APPROXIMATELY 2' DEEP.16. 3' SEPARATION BETWEEN JOINTS, FITTINGS, SERVICE SADDLES ANDWYES ARE REQUIRED FOR SS AND WATER TAPS.17. ANY EXISTING SEWER AND WATER SERVICES NOT BEING UTILIZEDARE TO BE ABANDONED TO THE MAIN PER CFPUA STANDARDS.18. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IS BY PRIVATE DUMPSTER SERVICE.
C-3 4
DE
T
A
I
L
S
NTS
REVISIONS
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING NUMBER:
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET SIZE:
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE):
2024-007
CLIENT INFORMATION:Reagan, LLC303 Fox Lake Dr.Clinton, NC 28328
OF 7
JAE
CDC
CDC
24x36
8/29/2024
RE
A
G
A
N
R
E
T
A
I
L
A
N
D
OF
F
I
C
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
PREL
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
DRA
W
I
N
G
D
O
N
O
T
U
S
E
FOR
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SITE
CA
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
CASTLE AVE.
HOLLY SHELTER RD.
SITE WORK NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS BOTH ON AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE.2. CLEARING: CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TREES AND VEGETATION WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED TO REMAIN.3. GRUBBING AND STRIPPING: CONTRACTOR SHALL RAKE AND REMOVE ROOTS, STUMPS, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, EXISTING STRUCTURES ABOVE AND BELOW GRADE,ORGANIC MATERIAL OR ANY OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.4. MUCKING: CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND THEIR GEOTECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE TO COORDINATE REMOVAL OF ANY SOFT AREAS.5. DISPOSAL: CLEARED, GRUBBED, STRIPPED OR OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPERLY PERMITTED FACILITY.6. FILL AND COMPACTION SHOULD COMPLY WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS.7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THAT THE GRADING PLAN MAY NOT REPRESENT A BALANCED EARTHWORK CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION TO SPECIFIED GRADES.8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH SUITABLE BORROW MATERIAL FROM AN OFF-SITE PROPERLY PERMITTED FACILITY AS REQUIRED.9. INFORMATION CONCERNING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WAS OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TODETERMINE THE EXACT ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AT ALL CROSSINGS PRIOR TO COMMENCING TRENCH EXCAVATION. IF ACTUALCLEARANCES ARE LESS THAN INDICATED ON PLAN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE DESIGN ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANYCONDITION DISCOVERED OR EXISTING THAT WOULD NECESSITATE A MODIFICATION OF THESE PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGNENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.10. NO CONSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN BEFORE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAS BEEN DETERMINED. CALL "NC ONE-CALL" AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORECOMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.11. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. BEFORE COMMENCING ANYEXCAVATIONS IN OR ALONG ROADWAYS OR RIGHT-OF-WAYS, PUBLIC AREAS OR IN PRIVATE EASEMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL APPROPRIATEPERSONNEL OF THEIR INTENT TO EXCAVATE, IN WRITING, NOT LESS THAN 10 DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE DISCONNECTION/ RECONNECTION AND/OR THE RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHAPPROPRIATE PERSONNEL.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL MANHOLES, VALVE & CURB BOXES TO FINAL GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION. ANY BOXES DAMAGED OROTHERWISE DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AT THE SITE. FURTHERMORE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES OR QUESTIONS TOTHE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANY AND ALL LAYOUT REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT HIS WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY OWNER.16. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MEET ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND CFPUA CODES. METERS, TAPS, MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP AND ALL FEESSHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS.17. ALL BACKFILL FROM UTILITY INSTALLATION MUST BE COMPACTED OR AMENDED TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC BEARING CAPACITY. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO BECONSULTED AT CONTRACTORS COST AS NECESSARY.18. ALL AREAS SHALL BE GRADED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALLAREAS SHALL BE SLOPED TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AT ALL TIMES.19. CONCRETE FOR WALKS, CURBS AND DRIVES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI @ 28 DAYS - AIR ENTRAINED.20. FIELD TESTING SHALL BE DONE BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY PAID FOR BY THE OWNER. FURTHER TESTING REQUIRED DUE TO A FAILED TESTWILL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.21. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE FREE OF CRACKS, BREAKS, OR ANY OTHER DEFECT PRIOR TO RECEIVING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
8" CONCRETE PAD
W/CROSS-BRACINGENCLOSURE GATES
6X6 - 6/6 W.W.F.AT 3000 PSI W/
WOOD SIDINGHORIZONTAL(TREATED)4"X4" POSTSFOOTINGSCONCRETE
2"X6" CAP
PAVEMENTASPHALT
10'
4"X4" POSTS
DUMPSTER PAD & ENCLOSURE DETAIL
ELEVATIONS
PLAN
NTS
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY GRADE
2% MIN SLOPE
6' MIN FROM EX. EOP
TYPICAL DRIVEWAY GRADING SECTION
NTS
EX. ROAD ±2% SLOPE
NTS
2" SF9.5A
8" ABC
PAVEMENT SECTION
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE1-1/2"R(TYP)
WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGROUND
LEGEND AND BORDER - GREENBACKGROUND - WHITE
12"
3/8"(TYP)
LEGEND AND BORDER - GREEN
BACKGROUND - WHITE
12"
COLORS
1-1/2"R(TYP)
LEGEND AND BORDER - GREENBACKGROUND - WHITE
18"
3/8"(TYP)
TO READ "VAN ACCESSIBLE".BOLT TO WD. POST WITH 3/8" CANDIUMPLATED NUTS, BOLTS & WASHERS
9" x 1'-6" x .080 STD ALUM. SIGN
NUTS, BOLTS & WASHERS.
9" x 1'-0" x .080 STD ALUM. SIGNTO READ "MAXIMUM PENALTY $250,GS 20-37.6". BOLT TO WD. POSTWITH 3/8" CANDIUM PLATED
PRESSURE TREATED 4"x4" POST.FINISHEDGRADE
HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN
WITH IDENTIFICATION SYMBOL.
1'-6" x 1'-0" x .080 STD. ALUM.
TO READ "RESERVED PARKING"
BOLT TO WD. POST W/ 3/8" CANDIUMPLATED NUTS, BOLTS & WASHERS.
TYPICAL HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL
NTS
R7-8a Sign(no arrows)
R7-8d Sign R7-8P Sign
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.INTERMEDIATE WIRES
SHALL HAVE A MIN. OF SIX LINE WIRES WITH 12" STAY
36" IN WIDTH. FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED
SELF-FASTENER STEEL ANGLE TYPE.
1. FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE A MIN. OF 32" IN WIDTH AND
2. FABRIC SHALL BE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND MIN. OF
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRE FABRIC AS DIRECTED BY THE
3. STEEL POST SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT AND BE OF THE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
NTS
SPACING.
ENGINEER.
NOTES:
VARIES (6'-8' MIN.)AS DIR. BY ENG.
STEEL POST
FIL
T
E
R
F
A
B
R
I
C
WIRE FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
4"
8"6"
ANCHORFABRICSKIRT ASDIRECTEDBYENGINEER
TEMPORARY GRAVELCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NTS
PUBL
I
C
R
O
A
D
COARSE AGGREGATE2" - 3"
6" MIN.REQU
I
R
E
D
AS
50' MI
N
.
12' M
I
N
.
GEO FABRIC LINER
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE 12' OR ENTIRE WIDTH OFNOTE:
ENTRANCE. WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
NTS
4' MAX.
NCDOT #5 OR # 57WASHED STONE
19-GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH(1/4 MESH OPENINGS)
FILTEREDWATER
INSPECT INLETS AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT(12 INCH OR GREATER) RAINFALL EVENT. CLEAR THE MESH WIRE OFANY DEBRIS OR OTHER OBJECTS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FLOW FORSUBSEQUENT RAINS. TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE OR UNDERCUTTHE WIRE MESH DURING SEDIMENT REMOVAL. REPLACE STONE ASNEEDED.
MAINTENANCE:
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION APPROACHINGTHE INLET.2. DRIVE 5-FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE GROUNDSURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE POSTS EVENLY AROUND THEPERIMETER OF THE INLET, A MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH HARDWARE CLOTH.SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO THE STEEL POSTS AT THE TOP,MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM. PLACINGA 2-FOOT FLAP OF WIRE MESHUNDER THE GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS RECOMMENDED.4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NCDOT #5 OR #57 STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPEWITH A HEIGHT OF 16 INCHES AROUND THE WIRE, ANDSMOOTH TO AN EVEN GRADE.5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEENSTABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, ANDESTABLISH FINAL GRADING ELEVATIONS.6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZED IT WITHGROUNDCOVER.
4" CONC. SIDEWALKw/6x6-10/10 W.W.M.
4"8"
x xxx
x ASPHALT
TURNDOWN SIDEWALK
NTS
CLASS A CONC.
7"1/8"R
1"3"R
6"
1 1/2"R
3"R
1'-
0
"
2'-0"1'-6" 6"
ASPHALT
DRAINAGE AWAY FROM CURB
CLASS A CONC.
24" CURB SECTION
NTS
ASPHALT
7"
2'-0"
3"R
1'-6"
1/8"R
1"
6"
6"1'-0
"
DRAINAGE TOWARD CURB
SHALL SLOPE AWAY AS SHOWNAWAY FROM CURB, GUTTERWHERE RUNOFF IS DIRECTED
SLOPE
SLOPE
1 1/2"R
3"R
SIDEWALK
SECTION A-A
4' min
SECTION B-B
A
A
BB
1.5±0.5%1.0-8.3% (30"MAX RISE)
10% MAX (X=36"MIN)8.3% MAX (X<36") (FOR ALTERATIONS
RAMP CURB AND GUTTER
WARNING DOMES
2' MIN
1.6-2.4" (TYP)
RAMP WIDTH
0.2"
Flare
WARNING DOMES
4'
FLARE
2.
1.6-2.4" (TYP)
TRUNCATED DOMESBASE DIAMETER0.9-1.4"TOP DIAMETER 50-60%OF BASE (TYP)
LANDING
NTS
WHEEL CHAIR RAMP DETAIL
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: 5901 Castle Hayne Road - Reagan Retail
Comments:
• New Hanover County Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities Plan Amendment: proposed
project on Castle Hayne Road, south of site.
NCDOT Projects: N/A
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: Based on the 11th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual, a TIA is required. This is because
PM peak hour trips exceed the threshold of 100.
Land Use (ITE Code) Intensity Unit 24 Hour
Volumes
AM Peak
Hour Trips
PM Peak
Hour Trips
General Office Building
(710) 13,200 SF 199 29 31
Strip Retail Plaza (822) 13,200 SF 719 31 87
Total 918 60 118
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Rick and Deanne Meadows, meadowsd@earthlink.net
From: Zach Dickerson, Senior Planner
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC
PID#: R01700-002-007-000
Egov# SITECN-24-000039
Subject: 4737 Castle Hayne Road – Meadows Commercial - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Zach Dickerson 910-798-7450
1. General Comments
a. Zoning is (CZD) B-2, per rezoning Z24-05
b. Please include the conditions of the rezoning approval on the site plan. This can be under
the site notes:
i. The proposed rezoning’s principal use shall be limited to: Animal Grooming
Services, Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage), Offices for Private Business
& Professional Activities, Instructional Services & Studios, Personal Services,
General Retail Sales, Minor Vehicle Service Station, and Warehousing.
ii. The attached shed that encroaches into the rear setback is to be removed, bringing
Dad’s Tire Store into compliance with required setbacks.
iii. A septic and well easement approved by New Hanover County Environmental
Health shall be recorded with the register of Deeds guaranteeing access and
maintenance for the existing septic system and any future improvements.
Environmental Health approval of the septic system and well shall be required
prior to issuance of construction permits for the flex commercial space.
iv. Exterior lighting including luminaries and security lighting shall be fully cutoff
fixtures that are directed downward in compliance with Figures of the UDO. In no
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 2
case shall lighting be directed at or above a horizontal plane through the lighting
fixture.
v. The two Significant trees identified on the concept plan shall be permanently
retained on site.
c. Please submit for a demolition permit for the shed on the rear of the property. The
demolition permit shall be granted prior TRC approval.
d. Please confirm width of sidewalk- 5’ minimum is required.
2. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. Please confirm whether the two garage spaces will be publicly accessible?
3. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. Please note that no building permit for any structure shall be issued which requires
NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the permit approval.
Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for building permit.
4. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. Site plan shows the two significant trees, 32” live oak and 48” water oak as retained on
site per the condition. Thanks!
b. If there are any trees to be removed on site, please apply for a tree removal permit.
5. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. To use the existing site vegetation to meet the requirements, you can include pictures
with the submittal and we can generally verify that it will be sufficient from pictures.
Thanks for including existing plantings!
b. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for street yard plantings.
c. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for foundation plantings.
6. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Typically, a lighting plan is not required for TRC approval, but because lighting was a
condition of the rezoning approval, we will hold TRC approval until the lighting plan can
be reviewed and approved.
7. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. For any signs on the site, please submit for a sign permit, referencing Section 5.6 of the
UDO for standards.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 3
8. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. Per the New Hanover County Conservation Resource map, there are no Conservation
Resources on the property.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Fire Finals Required
2. Please follow Chapter 33 – Safety during Construction and Demolition
3. Fire extinguishers required per NFPA 10
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
2. A County stormwater permit issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit applications documentation with requisite review fees to the COAST online
permit portal (https://newhanovercountync-
energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home). Applicable forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/251/Stormwater however the application form is not required as the
information will be gathered by the COAST portal.
3. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a high density
permit will be obtained.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site plan reflects connection to a septic system. Prior to building permit issuance septic
application must be submitted and permits issued. NHC Environmental Health and some local
Private Soil Scientists can issue said permits. Area for proposed septic system has significant
issues due to old drain field areas and tank areas for both the business and old home (which
cannot be used). Soils in this area are also problematic for septic system installations. It was
mentioned, in the rezoning, that a septic contractor looked at this area and determined it was
suitable for multiple businesses to install a new septic system. It is highly suggested that a soil
scientist consultant evaluate the area for viability of a septic system prior investing further
efforts for development.
2. The shared septic system must also have deeded legal easements issued and tri-party
agreements issued and recorded prior to building permit issuance.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 4
3. Site plan reflects connection to a private well. Any old wells on this property must be properly
abandoned by a certified well driller. New wells must have a well application and well permit
issued by NHC Environmental Health prior to building permit issuance. Wells for businesses
must maintain 100' of separation between the septic system and well location.
4. A shared well between two separate parcels will require easements and tri-party agreements
for water access and well repairs.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. Each suite will need a unit address. Please contact planning for address following TRC approval.
NHC Soil & Water, Brian Dadson 910-798-7138
1. See attachment.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. There is no CFPUA water and sewer available.
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. See attachment
WMPO, Greer Templer 910-341-0107
1. See attachment
Army Corps of Engineers, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611
1. No comment.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 5
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Rachel Capito
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Castle Hayne Road - 4737 - Dad's Tire Flex Space
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Kenansville fine sand (Ke), Seagate fine
sand (Se), Woodington fine sandy loam (Wo), and Wrightsboro fine sandy loam (Wr).
According to the booklet, “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for
Septic Tank Suitability”, Kenansville are Class I soils and Seagate, Woodington, and Wrightsboro are Class II soils.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kenansville as well drained, Wrightsboro as moderately well drained, Seagate as somewhat poorly drained, and
Woodington as poorly drained.
Woodington is on the New Hanover County Hydric Soils A list which means they are
possibly wetland areas and subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. Seagate is on the Hydric Soils B list, which means it may contain areas of wetland. It should be
noted, according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover County, the limitation for dwellings with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for
all of the soils on this site. The limitations are due to flooding and/or wetness. An adequate drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover
County, North
Carolina
Castle Hayne Road - 4737 - Dad's
Tire Flex Space
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................13
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.......................................13
Se—Seagate fine sand...............................................................................14
Wo—Woodington fine sandy loam..............................................................15
Wr—Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes...........................17
References............................................................................................................19
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
0
3
3
7
0
38
0
3
4
0
0
38
0
3
4
3
0
38
0
3
4
6
0
38
0
3
4
9
0
38
0
3
5
2
0
38
0
3
5
5
0
38
0
3
5
8
0
38
0
3
3
7
0
38
0
3
4
0
0
38
0
3
4
3
0
38
0
3
4
6
0
38
0
3
4
9
0
38
0
3
5
2
0
38
0
3
5
5
0
232170 232200 232230 232260 232290 232320 232350 232380 232410 232440 232470
232140 232170 232200 232230 232260 232290 232320 232350 232380 232410 232440 232470
34° 20' 20'' N
77
°
5
4
'
4
2
'
'
W
34° 20' 20'' N
77
°
5
4
'
2
8
'
'
W
34° 20' 13'' N
77
°
5
4
'
4
2
'
'
W
34° 20' 13'' N
77
°
5
4
'
2
8
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,540 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ke Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
0.5 9.2%
Se Seagate fine sand 2.4 48.4%
Wo Woodington fine sandy loam 0.8 15.3%
Wr Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes
1.4 27.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 5.0 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Se—Seagate fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrr
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seagate and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Seagate
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 12 inches: fine sand
Bh - 12 to 28 inches: fine sand
E' - 28 to 36 inches: fine sand
Bt - 36 to 40 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 40 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F153AY050NC - Moist Spodosol Rises and Flats, F153BY050NC
- Moist Spodosol Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wo—Woodington fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ws0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Woodington, drained, and similar soils:80 percent
Woodington, undrained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Woodington, Drained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 14 inches: fine sandy loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Btg - 14 to 74 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 74 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Woodington, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 14 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg - 14 to 74 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 74 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Wr—Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ws1
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wrightsboro and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wrightsboro
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and clayey fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 24 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 24 to 48 inches: sandy clay loam
2Bg - 48 to 80 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F153AY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
19
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Dads Tire Shop – 4737 Castle Hayne Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Site Plan Comments:
Provide positive drainage in the right of way along both parcels.
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• Show and label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
• The proposed fence on Sondey Road should not interfere with the sight
triangles/distance.
Show and label all gates with distances to the right of way line.
The radii for the driveway proposed driveway should be 30’ min.
• A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed
driveway crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
Label the internal protection stem length for the proposed driveway connection.
• Measured from the right-of-way line.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGHT T R IANGLE
10 ' BY 70 'S I GHT T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENTMIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OFSAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED EXCAVATION AT LEASTTWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM APPROACH DISTANCE TOENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THELATEST NEW HANOVER COUNTY ORDINANCES AND STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL.
Signature:
Name and Title: James Branch Smith, PE
Date:8/29/24
Registration Number:034354
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE CURRENT DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY ANDTHAT UPON RECEIPT OF "AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT" ANY CLEARING, GRADING,CONSTRUCTION, OR DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THISPLAN AND THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND RULES OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY, THESTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENCIES WHICHARE HEREBY PART OF THIS PLAN. AS THE DEVELOPER, WE ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSEDFACILITIES. WE WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO TRANSFER THIS RESPONSIBILITY WITHOUT THEWRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY.
Signature:
Name and Title: Paul and Deanne Meadows, Property Owner
Date:
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
NORTHCAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
SR
ITH034354
DOGW O O D LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
PRELIM. DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
8/16/24
JBS
COVER
1 5
SHEET:
SURVEYOR
SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
SHEET DESCRIPTIONINDEX
CX100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
CIVIL SHEET LIST
CS-100
1
2
3
4
PG.
COVER COVER SHEET
5 SITE AND UTILITY DETAILSCD-100
AUGUST 2024
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
DESIGN DRAWINGS
MEADOWS COMMERCIAL LOT
Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
COVER
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
L
O
T
Pa
u
l
a
n
d
D
e
a
n
n
e
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
47
1
7
I
n
d
i
a
n
C
o
r
n
T
r
a
i
l
Ca
s
t
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANCG-100
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY
R
D
Septic Field & Repair
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
ExistingShed to beRemoved
Area to beRemoved
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
S R
ITH034354
DOGW O OD LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/29/24
CX100
2 5
EXISTINGCONDITIONS
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
2. This property is not impacted by any AEC.
3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlayresources.
4. This site is not impacted by any recognizedhistoric or archeological significance.
5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site.
6. Existing regulated trees have been field located. No"Specimen" trees were identified. Tree protection
7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands.
8. There is no evidence of endangered species orhabitat issues on the site.
Site Inventory Notes:
9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard
10. The site runoff will flow into the Prince George
1. Soils: Se (Segate fine sand)
and mitigation - if necessary - will be completedduring detailed design & permitting.
Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720322100K,dated August 28, 2018.
Creek watershed.
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY R
D
House BurnedDemolishedand Removed
NA
D
8
3
(
2
0
1
1
)
(N
C
G
R
I
D
)
Cast
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
R
o
a
d
(
U
.
S
.
H
w
y
.
1
1
7
)
Sondey
R
o
a
d
/
S
.
R
.
1
3
3
4
(Var
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
/
W
)
N 66°24'
2
5
"
W
1
4
0
.
0
8
'
S 36°
3
8
'
3
5
"
W
2
4
3
.
3
5
'
N 28°
2
7
'
3
5
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
S 69°58'25
"
E
1
7
6
.
1
2
'
(50' R/
W
)
48'' Water Oak
32'' Live Oak
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
e
30'
50'
30'
New
"
F
l
e
x
"
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
SpaceNew
"
F
l
e
x
"
20' B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
20' Tra
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
30' Side
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
n/f
Ryan P. &Amanda D. Mekler
D.B. 6246-464Zoning: RALand Use: Vacant
n/fEvelyn PotterDavis Heirs
D.B. 6559-2347Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
n/f
RyanGriffin
D.B. 5904-2713Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fRichard &Dara Kern
D.B. 6041-82Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fAliciaVasquez
D.B. 6258-2144
Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
150.
0
4
'
76.8
8
'
20'
B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
25' S
t
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
B
u
f
f
e
r
y
a
r
d
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
25' Street
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
New15' x 30'Tire Shed
W
24'
62'
25'
31'
S 53°
5
6
'
8
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
157.8
3
'
IG
MC
IV
IC
MC
IGSM
IV
IC
SM
SM
SM
IL
MC-P
IV
R2
5
'
R25'
R1
0
'
R10'
18'
9'
48'
IC
34'
R5
'
R5'
2% FROM EOP
2%
F
R
O
M
E
O
P
IG
FFE
=
2
3
.
0
0
21
22
22
21
2
3
22
22
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
S R
ITH034354
DOGW O OD LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/29/24
CS100
3 5
SITE ANDLANDSCAPEPLAN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
3. Current Zoning District: RA
2. Tract Area: 36,372 s.f.± (0.84 ac.)
1. New Hanover County Parcel No.:
General Notes:
4. Comprehensive Plan Classification:Community Mixed-Use
322112.95.1866
Development Data:
[PID R1700-002-007-000]
Total Building Area - 7,070 s.f.±
New Building Parking - (@ 2.5 spaces / 1000 s.f. GFA)Min. Spaces Req'd. = 8** Spaces Prov'd. = 9 ** (2 garage spaces)
Max. Proposed New Building Height - 1-Story / 25'
Proposed District - (CZD) B-2
2. This property is not impacted by any AEC.
3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlayresources.
4. This site is not impacted by any recognizedhistoric or archeological significance.
5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site.
6. Existing regulated trees have been field located. No"Specimen" trees were identified. Tree protection
7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands.
8. There is no evidence of endangered species orhabitat issues on the site.
Site Inventory Notes:
9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard
10. The site runoff will flow into the Prince George
1. Soils: Se (Segate fine sand)
and mitigation - if necessary - will be completedduring detailed design & permitting.
Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720322100K,dated August 28, 2018.
Creek watershed.
Utility Notes:
1. Water service will be provided by a private, on-site well. Sanitary sewer service is provided by a
gas & telephone shall be installed underground.
3. Solid waste disposal will be by dumpster pickup by
2. All utility services, such as electric power, CATV,
private on-site septic system. No Fire Hydrants
private contractor / hauler.
Proposed New (Lot 2) - +3,000 s.f.±
Ex. Bldg. Addition (Lot 1) - + 450 s.f.±
Existing (Lot 1) - 5,200 s.f.±Ex. Shed to be Removed (Lot 1) - -1,580 s.f.±
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY R
D
Lot 2 Impervious Data:Rooftop - 3000 s.f.Parking Lot - 3600 s.f.Sidewalks - 300 s.f.DOT Driveway 1100 s.f.
Total - 8,000 s.f.
in the area.
Lot 1 Impervious Data:Ex. Rooftop - 4950 s.f.Ex. Concrete-Gravel Yards - 7675 s.f.
Total Existing - 12,625 s.f.Existing Removed - -1500 s.f.
New Building Addition - +450 s.f.
Total Redeveloped - 11,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Treated:Permit Threshold - -10,000 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Total: 19,575 s.f.
19,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Treated:9,575 s.f.
NCDEQ Permit Exclusion:
12,625 s.f.Lot 1 and 2 Existing Total:Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Total: 19,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious NET: 6,950 s.f.
LANDSCAPE PLANT SCHEDULE:
RIBBON CURB(SEE DETAILS)
ACCESSIBLESPACE, SIGN,AND AISLE(SEE DETAILS)
PROPOSEDSEPTIC AREASPERMIT BYOTHERS
PROPOSED INFILTRATIONAGGREGATE UNDERPERVIOUS PAVEMENT
SIDEWALK, TYP.
PROPOSED WELL BYOTHERS (SEE DETAILS)
6-FT SHADOWBOX FENCE
IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS 100% OPAQUE,PROPOSED PLANTINGS MAY BE OMITTEDTO BE VERIFIED WITH ZONING INSPECTOR
IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS 100% OPAQUE,PROPOSED PLANTINGS MAY BE OMITTEDTO BE VERIFIED WITH ZONING INSPECTOR
10X70 SITE DISTANCETRIANGLES, TYP.
10X70 SITE DISTANCETRIANGLES, TYP.
Cast
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
R
o
a
d
(
U
.
S
.
H
w
y
.
1
1
7
)
Sondey
R
o
a
d
/
S
.
R
.
1
3
3
4
(Va
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
/
W
)
23
23
21
21
N 66°24'
2
5
"
W
1
4
0
.
0
8
'
S 36°3
8
'
3
5
"
W
2
4
3
.
3
5
'
N 28
°
2
7
'
3
5
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
S 69°58'2
5
"
E
1
7
6
.
1
2
'
(50' R/
W
)
22
21
22
23
19
19
20
20
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
e
30'
50'
30'
New
"
F
l
e
x
"
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
eNew
"
F
l
e
x
"
ExistingGravel Dr.
ExistingGravel
ExistingGarage
ExistingOffice
ExistingShed
20' B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
20' Tra
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
30' Side
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
n/f
Ryan P. &
Amanda D. Mekler
D.B. 6246-464Zoning: RALand Use: Vacant
n/fEvelyn PotterDavis Heirs
D.B. 6559-2347Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
n/f
RyanGriffin
D.B. 5904-2713Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fRichard &
Dara Kern
D.B. 6041-82Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fAliciaVasquez
D.B. 6258-2144
Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
150
.
0
4
'
76.8
8
'
20'
B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
B
u
f
f
e
r
y
a
r
d
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
25' Street
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Ex.Sign
& Parking
ExistingConcrete
ExistingConcrete
GarageDoor
GarageDoor
New15' x 30'Tire Shed
(EP 23.03)
S 53°
5
6
'
8
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
157.
8
3
'
Gravel Dr.
EOP
EOPC
C
C
C
C
C
C
(EG 22.93)
NO ROW DITCHGRADE TO DRAIN
EP 22.80
2% FROM EOP
2%
F
R
O
M
E
O
P
EP 22.90
(EP 23.13)
EP 22.50
EP 22.50
EP 22.25
EP 22.25
EP 22.85
EP 22.50
EP 22.50
EP 23.00
EP 23.00
EP 22.25
FFE
=
2
3
.
0
0
EP 23.00
21
22
22
21
2
3
SW 23.00
SW 22.70
SW 22.70
SW 22.90
(EP 23.08)
(EP 23.45)
(EP 22.70)
(EP 23.03)
(EG 22.95)
(GRV 23.04)
(GRV 23.17)
(GRV 22.70)
(EP 23.26)
22
22
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PRO
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JAMEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEALAL
SR
ITH034354
DOGWO O D LD, P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
7/29/24
CG100
4 5
GRADINGANDDRAINAGE PLAN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY
R
D
6" PVCDOWNSPOUTCOLLECTION
6" PVCDOWNSPOUTCOLLECTION
6" SLOTTED PVCWITHIN AGGREGATEBASE (SEE DETAILS)
6" HEADER CURBAROUND PERVIOUS(SEE DETAILS)
PG = PROPOSED GRADE (GROUND)(EG) = EXISTING GRADEEP = EDGE OF PAVEMENTEC = EDGE OF CONCRETESW = TOP OF SIDEWALKBC/TC = TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONGRV = GRAVEL PARKING
RIM = CENTER OF GRATECI = CATCH BASINDI = DROP INLETYI = YARD INLETMH = STORM MANHOLECL = CENTERLINEINV = INVERTC/O = TOP OF CLEANOUT(EG) = EXISTING ELEVATIONS, TYP.
SPOT GRADE LEGEND:
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES:
1.)STORMWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE PROPERTY OWNER, INCLUDING PIPES, STRUCTURES, ANDSTORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES AS PERMITTED WITH THESTATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION.
2.) ALL IMPERVIOUS MUST DRAIN TO THE DESIGNED STORMWATERSYSTEM UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
3.) BUILDINGS SHALL DIVERT ROOF DRAINAGE TO STORMWATERCOLLECTION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR, BUILDERS, AND OWNERSARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ROOF DRAINAGE PIPING INADVANCE OR ORDERING FINAL STORM DRAINAGE. REF. CIVIL ORARCHITECT DETAILS FOR TYPICAL DOWNSPOUT DETAILS ANDCONNECTIONS.
4.)REFERENCE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR GRADING, DRAINAGEAND EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED SEPARATELY BUT INCLUDEDHEREIN THESE DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. ANYDISCREPANCIES SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIORTO CHANGING THE WORK. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH PENDER COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF SURFCITY BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
5.) GEOTECHNICAL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED ON-SITE BY ATHIRD-PARTY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IN ORDER TO CONFIRMSUITABILITY OF SOILS AND SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND SET THEMINIMUM COMPACTION VALUES IN FILL AREAS, UTILITY TRENCHES,PAVEMENT, AND BUILDING PADS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIPTOPSOIL AND ANY UNSUITALBE MATERIAL AND PROVIDE CUT/FILLOPERATIONS TO PROVIDE A COMPACTED CONTROLLEDSUBGRADE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER.
12" RIBBON CURB(SEE DETAILS)
SEPTIC EASEMENTFOR LOTS 1 AND 2
PRELIM. DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PRO
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JAMEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEALAL
SR
ITH034354
DOGWO O D LD, P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/30/24
5 5
NTS
NOTE: PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITHGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OTHERWISE SECTION IS TYPICAL FORRESIDENTIAL STREETS IN THE AREA, BUT ANY PAVEMENTFAILURES MUST BE AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE.
GENERAL CIVIL-SITE NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ANY/ALL PERMITSREQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMITSISSUED.
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO ESTABLISH AND CHECK ALLHORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS TO BE USED WITH THEPROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY A PROFESSIONALSURVEYOR TO PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENT STAKEOUT(S).
4. ANYTIME WORK IS PERFORMED OFF-SITE OR WITHIN ANEXISTING EASEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THEHOLDER OF SAID EASEMENT AND TO FOLLOW ANY GUIDELINESOR STANDARDS WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH OR REFERENCEDIN THE RECORDED EASEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOYPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM LOCATION OFEASEMENTS AS NEEDED.
5. CIVIL SITE PLANS DO NOT REPRESENT ACCURACY OR PIPEPENETRATION LOCATIONS OF ALL STRUCTURES. CONTRACTORAND OWNER SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FORALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS.
GENERAL CONTRACT NOTES:
1. REASONABLE CARE HAS BEEN EXERCISED IN SHOWING THE LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES ON THE PLANS. THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES IS NOT KNOWN IN ALL CASES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPLORETHE AREA AHEAD OF DITCHING OPERATIONS BY OBSERVATIONS, ELECTRONICDEVICES, HAND DIGGING AND BY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH THE UTILITYCOMPANIES. IN ORDER TO LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES IN ADVANCE OFTRENCHING OPERATIONS SO AS TO ELIMINATE OR MINIMIZE DAMAGE TOEXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLCOSTS RESULTING FROM ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING UTILITY LINESINCLUDING LOSS OF UTILITY REVENUES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FORTEMPORARY SUPPORT OF EXISTING UTILITIES, SUCH AS POLES, CONDUITS,FIBER OPTIC CABLES, TELEPHONE CABLES, WATER LINES, ETC.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS ANDINTERPRETATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR SAFETY AND HEALTHREGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROMULGATED UNDER THEOCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLAN AND CONSTRUCT WORK SO AS TO CAUSE MINIMUMINCONVENIENCE TO THE OWNER AND THE PUBLIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLPROVIDE, ERECT AND MAINTAIN AT ALL TIMES DURING THE PROGRESS ORTEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF WORK, SUITABLE BARRIERS, FENCES, SIGNS OROTHER ADEQUATE PROTECTION, INCLUDING FLAGMEN AND WATCHMEN ASNECESSARY TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AS WELL AS THOSEENGAGED IN THE CONSTRUCTION WORK. CONSTRUCTION SIGNING SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF "CONSTRUCTION ANDMAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPLEMENT TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORMTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" BY THE USDOT.
4. ANY DISCREPANCY IN THIS PLAN AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BEREPORTED TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. GENERALCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL SETBACKS,EASEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON BEFORE BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION.
5. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING AS IT IS A REPRODUCTION AND SUBJECT TO DISTORTION.
6. IF DEPARTURES FROM THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS ARE DEEMEDNECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR, DETAILS OF SUCH DEPARTURES ANDREASONS THEREOF SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW, NODEPARTURES FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUTTHE PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT COUNTY.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALLUNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE NOTNECESSARILY SHOWN ON PLANS AND WHERE SHOWN ARE ONLYAPPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGETO UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCONTACTING ALL NONSUBSCRIBING UTILITIES. C A L L NC-811.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL INSPECTIONS,CERTIFICATIONS, EQUIPMENT, ETC., THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
9. THE ENGINEER DISCLAIMS ANY ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS ANDMETHODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT AS SET FORTH IN THESE PLANS.
GENERAL EARTHWORK NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO STRIP TOPSOIL AND ANY UNSUITABLEMATERIAL AND PROVIDE CUT/FILL OPERATIONS TO PROVIDE A COMPACTEDCONTROLLED PAVEMENT SUBGRADE, AND BUILDING PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CIVIL ENGINEER CAN RECOMMEND A TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTIONUPON REQUEST, BUT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PAVEMENT TESTING ANDSECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIELD CONDITIONS ANDGEOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO ESTABLISH AND CHECK ALL HORIZONTAL ANDVERTICAL CONTROLS TO BE USED WITH THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALLEMPLOY A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENTSTAKEOUT(S).
3. ANYTIME WORK IS PERFORMED OFF-SITE OR WITHIN AN EXISTING EASEMENT,THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE HOLDER OF SAID EASEMENT AND TOFOLLOW ANY GUIDELINES OR STANDARDS WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ORREFERENCED IN THE RECORDED EASEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOYPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM LOCATION OF EASEMENTS ASNEEDED.
5. CIVIL SITE PLANS DO NOT REPRESENT ACCURACY OR PIPE PENETRATIONLOCATIONS OF ALL STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL REFER TOARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS.
CD100
CIVIL NOTESAND DETAILS
6" - AGGREGATE BASE COURSECOMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALREPORT
COMPACTED SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
2.0" - SF9.5C SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOTSPECIFICATIONS
NOTES
1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS AISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE.
2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S AND ADA STANDARDS AND IF DIFFERENT THAN THIS DETAIL SHALL BE THE DIMENSIONING SHOWN ON THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OWNER STANDARD PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS AND COLORS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE WHITE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE YELLOW PAINT FOR STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS.
8'8'
SIGN
HANDICAP SIGN DETAIL
NOTES:
2.1.POST HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR BACKFILL IN 3-INCH TO 4-INCH LIFTS.METAL POST AND ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL, ASTM A307-90.
5.TOP EDGE TREATMENT FILM SHALL BE 3" WIDE, CLEAR AND TRANSPARENT WITH A
8.
7.
6.
SPACING BETWEEN LINES.
ARROWS SHALL BE 5.625" LONG BY 3.75" HIGH.CORNER RADIUS OF SIGNS SHALL BE 2.5"
SHALL BE 3.75" HEIGHT AND LOWERCASE LETTERS SHALL BE 2.5" HEIGHT WITH 3.75"SIGN LETTERING SHALL BE NPS MODIFIED CLARENDON TYPEFACE. UPPERCASE LETTERSBY 3M COMPANY.REFLECTIVE FACING MATERIAL SHALL BE SCOTCHLITE HIGH INTENSITY, MANUFACTUREDTRANSPARENT FILE #639.SUB-RESISTANT PRESSURE SENSITIVE NON-YELLOWING ADHESIVE, "SKOTCHCAL"
4.
3.
WITH ASTM STD B-209. THICKNESS SHALL BE 0.80 INCHES.SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ALUMINUM, TYPE 6061-T6 AND IN CONFORMANCECOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI.CONCRETE FOR FOOTING SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT AND HAVE A MINIMUMTHOROUGHLY HAND TAMP EACH LIFT AND CROWN BACKFILL AT TOP TO SHED WATER.
9.MOUNT ON BUILDING OR METAL POST AS DIRECTED.
NOT TO SCALE
12"
7'
PAVEMENT/GRASS
9"
9"
2"
R7-8D
12"x9"
6"
18"
MUTCD
12"x18"
R7-8
R7-8a9"VAN
ACCESSIBLE
18"
2"
12"x6"
12"
4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.)
8" DIAM.
1'-4
"
10"
1'-1
0
"
8"
1'-2"
14"R
GENERAL NOTES:1. A GROOVE JOINT 1" DEEP WITH 1/8" RADII SHALL BE REQUIRED IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT 5' INTERVALS.2. ONE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE REQUIRED AT 45' INTERVALS.3. A 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE THE SIDEWALK ABUTS ANY CURB AND GUTTER AND ANY RIGID STRUCTURES.4. IN SIDEWALKS AND PLAZA AREAS EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED AT NO GREATER THAN 30' INTERVALS.5. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3600 PSI. IN 28 DAYS.
3600 P.S.I.CONCRETE
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO GRASSED AREAS AND PLANTERS
CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL
GROOVE JOINT (5'MAX. O.C.)1/8" RADIUS
1/8"
4"
3600 P.S.I.CONCRETE
GROOVE JOINT(5' MAX. O.C.)1/8" RADIUS
1/8"
3"
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
BOTTOM OF AGGREGATEMIN. 24" SEPARATIONFROM SHWL
NOTES:1. PERVIOUS CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ACI522.1-13, 'SPECIFICATION FOR PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT,'PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE EXCEPT ASMODIFIED BY THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
2. IN-FIELD INFILTRATION TESTING SHALL CONFIRM LAND MANAGEMENT SOILTESTS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.
3. SHWL (SEASONALLY HIGH WATER TABLE) TO BE DETERMINED BY SOILSCIENTIST.
12"x12" CONCRETE HEADER CURB (3,000 PSI)
4"
1-1
/
2
"
G
A
P
LANDSCAPEISLAND
RIBBON HEADER CURB AND PAVEMENT DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
6" PERVIOUS CONCRETE
12" WASHED #57 STONE
ASPHALT PVMT.
6"x12" CONCRETE HEADER CURB
NOTE: PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITHGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR NCDOT DRIVEWAY INSPECTORS.
8" - AGGREGATE BASE COURSECOMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALREPORT
COMPACTED SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
2.0" - SF9.5C SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOTSPECIFICATIONS
6" PVC PERFORATED DRAIN PIPEWRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE SOCK
PERFORATED PVC PIPE SECTIONNOT TO SCALE
6"
6"
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: 4737 Castle Hayne Road - Dad’s Tire Store & Flex Space
Comments:
• Please note if there is a proposed intended use for the flex space. If there is an intention
for the use to be like the current business on site, a tire shop, please specify. Otherwise
note whether it would be more akin to office space, retail, or warehouse to list a few
examples. Clarifying the intended use of space, if available, will help determine potential
traffic impacts and ensure proper site planning.
NCDOT Projects: N/A
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: To run a trip generation, more details on the proposed usage for the flex space needs to be
provided.
Hooks and Arrow – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: T. Branch Smith, Dogwood Land Development – dogwoodldpllc@gmail.com
From: Amy Doss
Development Planner
Date: October 2nd 2024 TRC Review
PID#: R08514-004-008-000
Egov# SITECN-24-000040
Subject: Hooks & Arrow – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2nd, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional
comments may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
NHC Planning, Amy Doss 910-798-7571
1. General Comments
a. Zoning: (CZD) CB. Please correct General Note #3 to reflect the updated site status per
rezoning case Z24-09.
b. Please log on to COAST account to pay INV-00129133, SITECN-24-000040.
2. Please include the following approved site plan components, per rezoning case Z23-20:
a. Please label the fence on the site plan.
3. UDO Section 3.3.1, Superseding District Standards & Setbacks
a. Setbacks are correct.
4. UDO Section 5.1 Parking and Loading
a. Development Data table state 5 parking spaces have been provided, however only 4 are
shown on the site plan. Please correct accordingly.
5. UDO Section 5.2. Traffic, Access, & Connectivity
a. Please note on the site plan that “No building permit for any structure shall be issued
which requires NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the permit
approval. Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for the building permit.”
Hooks & Arrow Retail – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review
Page | 2
6. UDO Section 5.3 Tree Retention
a. Please apply for a tree removal permit if trees are to be removed.
b. Per UDO Section 5.3.4.C, of the UDO requires a minimum of 15 trees at least 2” DBH must
be retained or planted on the parcel where development occurs for each acre or
proportionate area disturbed. Please add a note to the Landscape Plan showing has this
requirement has been met. Please note that required landscaping for the project can be
credited to meet this requirement, however, required landscaping does not count
towards mitigation, if applicable.
7. UDO Section 5.4 Landscaping and Buffering
a. Please show the location of the fence as shown on the approved concept plan.
b. Please provide a breakdown of the number of plantings required, and number of plantings
provided for: the transitional buffer, parking lot perimeter, parking lot interior, street
yard, and foundation plantings.
c. Please show the location of the dumpster and detail showing screening for the dumpster.
8. UDO Section 5.5 Exterior Lighting
a. Is any lighting proposed for the development?
b. Please note that with the latest update to the UDO, a lighting plan is not required at time
of TRC approval. See below excerpt from Section 5.5.3:
i. Information about the exterior lighting for the site that demonstrates compliance
with the standards in this section shall be submitted in conjunction with an
application for site plan approval (Section 10.3.6, Site Plan) or zoning compliance
approval (Section 10.3.8, Zoning Compliance Approval), whichever comes first,
approved no later than at time of construction plan approval.
c. When the lighting plan is submitted, please ensure that the foot candles from the street
lights at the lot lines do not exceed 0.5, as the adjacent land is residential.
9. UDO Section 5.6 Signs
a. Please show the location of all signs.
b. Please note that all signs are subject to Section 5.6 of the UDO.
c. Please submit for sign permits prior to installation.
NHC Fire Services, Sunnie Batson 910-798-7464
1. See attached.
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. Based on the proposed impervious area and anticipated limits of disturbance, no County issue
permit are anticipated. Should more than 10,000 SF of impervious be proposed or more than an
acre of disturbed, then permitting would be required.
2. Please indicate all erosion control measures with details, specifications and maintenance
requirements with the drainage plan submission with building permit application.
Hooks & Arrow Retail – Commercial Site Plan – TRC Review
Page | 3
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site plan reflects connection to public water. Proposed infrastructure will not violate setbacks of
any surrounding properties wells.
2. Site plan reflects connection to public sewer. Proposed infrastructure will not violate setbacks of
any surrounding properties septic systems.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. No comments, current address is acceptable.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. There is no CFPUA water and sewer available.
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-398-9100
See attached.
WMPO
See attached.
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
New Hanover Soil & Water, Dru Harrison
USACE, Rachel Capito
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
USACOE, Brad Shaver
New Hanover County Fire Rescue
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 130
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: (910) 798-7420 Fax: (910) 798-7052
Protecting the citizens and visitors of New Hanover County
TRC Plan Review - 2018 NC Fire Code
Pursuant to the North Carolina Fire Prevention Code and New Hanover County Ordinances Section 26
Required for Plan Review Submittal
• The complete TRC/Site plans comments from New Hanover County Fire staff shall be submitted
along with the building plans for review to New Hanover County Fire Marshal’s Office. This
shall include the complete set of civil plans. Failure to submit the comments or complete set of
civil plans will result in a resubmittal for review for verification of compliance.
• Per NCFC 507.1, an engineered fire flow analysis report in accordance with the fire code and
Appendix B to include pertinent information shall be submitted with the permit application along
with all other required documents. A fire flow test shall be conducted in accordance with NFPA
291 and NCFC 507.4. This report shall be submitted by a P.E. and include the stamp of the
submitting individual on the report.
Construction
• NCFC Chapter 33 shall be followed throughout the construction process.
Accessibility
• Fire apparatus access roads are required at time of construction. They are to be capable of
handling the weight of fire apparatus and be passable in all weather conditions. Fire apparatus
access roads are to be a minimum of 20 feet wide (Chapter 5), unless there are fire hydrants
installed along the roadway then minimum is 26 feet wide (Appendix D). The fire code official
may increase this width as necessary based on potential for fire apparatus response.
• All new structures must comply with Appendix J of the NC Fire Code, Building Information
Signs. An example can be provided upon request.
• Address identification signs are required, temporary signs during construction are acceptable as
long as they are legible and weather resistant. (Chapter 5).
• Key Boxes (KNOX Boxes)
o Required if structure is required to have a fire alarm system or automatic sprinkler
system.
New Hanover County Fire Rescue
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 130
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: (910) 798-7420 Fax: (910) 798-7052
Protecting the citizens and visitors of New Hanover County
o Knox Box required at/adjacent to the front (main) entrance, at an elevation of 5 ft, +/- 6
in. A KNOX box(es) is(are) required at the exterior access nearest the fire sprinkler
riser(s). Larger facilities may require additional key boxes. All key box locations must be
shown on the building plans. All key boxes are required to be installed prior to final
inspection.
o The customer may order online from Knox.
• Premises identification is required. Address and or unit numbers are required on the street side as
well as unit identification on rear access doors. Letters and Numbers shall not be less than 6
inches tall and ¾ inches wide; must be weather resistant and contrasting in color to their
background. (Chapter 5).
• Rooms containing controls for HVAC, fire sprinkler risers, fire alarm control panels, or other fire
detection/protection equipment must be identified with signage (Chapter 5).
Water Supply (Chapter 5 and Appendix C)
• A fire hydrant will be required at the intersection of South Seabreeze Road and Access Road [SR
1575] on the corner nearest the project. [NCFC C104.1]
o The existing hydrant shown on the site plan is not sufficient due to requiring roads to be
shut down by supply lines—preventing access to the public and fire apparatus.
• If a water supply is required for fire protection a fire hydrant system or other means approved by
the fire code official must be present prior to beginning construction and be maintained operable
during the construction period.
• An engineered fire flow calculation indicating the available fire flow shall be submitted to the
Fire Marshal’s Office during plans review.
• If an approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection is
available, fire hydrants shall be provided.
• If the approved water supply is not capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection
a private system shall be engineered to meet the required fire flow for both automatic sprinkler
systems and manual fire protection.
New Hanover County Fire Rescue
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 130
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: (910) 798-7420 Fax: (910) 798-7052
Protecting the citizens and visitors of New Hanover County
• Fire Hydrants
o All fire hydrants shall meet the CFPUA specifications: a 5 ¼ inch barrel, a 5 ¼ inch valve
opening, two 2 ½ inch NST side discharges and a 5-inch pumper nozzle with a 5-inch
STORZ connection. Further information is available from the Fire Marshal’s Office and
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority.
o All fire hydrants shall be installed so they are visible from the fire apparatus access road
with unobstructed access and a clear space no less than 36 inches in all directions. They
shall be protected from vehicle impact by curbing, guard posts or other means approved
by the fire code official. They shall be oriented with the large discharge facing the nearest
street. All discharges shall meet the NFPA requirements for distance above grade.
o Additional fire hydrants may be required by the fire code official based on the type of
hazard or use of the protected structure. (Appendix C)
Separate submittals will be required for additional fire and life safety equipment.
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: S Seabreeze Rd - 802 - Hooks & Arrow Retail
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Baymeade fine sand (Be), Leon sand (Le),
Lynn Haven fine sand (Ly), Murville fine sand (Mu), and Wakulla sand (Wa).
According to the booklet, “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for
Septic Tank Suitability”, Wakulla is a Class I soil, Baymeade is Class II soils, and Leon, Lynn Haven, and Murville are Class III soils.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Baymeade as well drained, Wakulla as somewhat excessively drained, Leon and Lynn Haven as poorly drained, and Murville
as very poorly drained.
Leon, Lynn Haven, and Murville are on the New Hanover County Hydric Soils Ä list
which means they are possibly wetland areas and subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act It should be noted, according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover
County, the limitation for dwellings with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for all the soils on this site. The limitations are due to
flooding and/or wetness. An adequate drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover
County, North
Carolina
S Seabreeze Rd - 802 - Hooks &
Arrow Retail
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................13
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes........................................13
Le—Leon sand............................................................................................14
Ly—Lynn Haven fine sand..........................................................................15
Mu—Murville fine sand................................................................................16
Wa—Wakulla sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes...................................................18
References............................................................................................................20
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
37
7
2
9
1
0
37
7
2
9
4
0
37
7
2
9
7
0
37
7
3
0
0
0
37
7
3
0
3
0
37
7
3
0
6
0
37
7
3
0
9
0
37
7
3
1
2
0
37
7
3
1
5
0
37
7
2
9
1
0
37
7
2
9
4
0
37
7
2
9
7
0
37
7
3
0
0
0
37
7
3
0
3
0
37
7
3
0
6
0
37
7
3
0
9
0
37
7
3
1
2
0
37
7
3
1
5
0
232490 232520 232550 232580 232610 232640 232670
232490 232520 232550 232580 232610 232640
34° 3' 54'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
4
'
'
W
34° 3' 54'' N
77
°
5
3
'
4
7
'
'
W
34° 3' 46'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
4
'
'
W
34° 3' 46'' N
77
°
5
3
'
4
7
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,240 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Be Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6
percent slopes
0.2 3.7%
Le Leon sand 0.4 9.5%
Ly Lynn Haven fine sand 3.1 71.7%
Mu Murville fine sand 0.3 7.2%
Wa Wakulla sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
0.3 7.9%
Totals for Area of Interest 4.3 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Baymeade and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baymeade
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 2 inches: fine sand
E/Bh - 2 to 30 inches: fine sand
Bt - 30 to 40 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 40 to 80 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Minor Components
Lynn haven, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Leon
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Murville, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Torhunta, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, flats
on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Le—Leon sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrb
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Map Unit Composition
Leon and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Leon
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 15 inches: sand
Bh - 15 to 30 inches: fine sand
BE - 30 to 33 inches: fine sand
E' - 33 to 66 inches: fine sand
B'h - 66 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ly—Lynn Haven fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrf
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Map Unit Composition
Lynn haven, undrained, and similar soils:85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynn Haven, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 9 inches: sand
E - 9 to 12 inches: fine sand
Bh - 12 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 6 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Mu—Murville fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrh
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Murville, undrained, and similar soils:80 percent
Murville, drained, and similar soils:10 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Murville, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Murville, Drained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wa—Wakulla sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrz
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wakulla and similar soils:85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wakulla
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Sandy and loamy marine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: sand
E - 7 to 24 inches: sand
Bt - 24 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 85 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:1 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (1.98
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
20
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
21
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Hook & Arrow – 802 S. Seabreeze Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• No private utilities are allowed inside the NCDOT Right-of-way.
• Only NCDOT approved materials are allowed inside the NCDOT Right-of-way.
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Site Plan Comments:
Drainage/Stormwater Conveyance:
• Additional information is needed on the existing and proposed drainage in the
area.
• An 18’ RCP is shown to cross Access Road, but no invert is provided on the
opposite side.
• If the drainage does not naturally flow to the NCDOT right of way the historic
drainage pattern should be maintained.
• Hydraulic calculations and associated plan sheets will need to be submitted for the
site.
o This will be reviewed by the NCDOT Hydraulics Unit.
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
• No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed driveway
crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGHT T R IANGLE
10 ' BY 70 'S I GHT T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENTMIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
99
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
99
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
101010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1111
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1111
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1111
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11 11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1212
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1212
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12 1212
1212 12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
1313
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
1313
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13 13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1515
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1515
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
1717
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
1818
1818
18
18
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21 21
21
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIONS
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
$$$$$$SYSTIME$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$DGN$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$USERNAME$$$$
8/17/99 INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANYCONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSEDEXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENTOF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUMAPPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
DOGWO O D LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
PROJ. NO.24105.DLD
8/16/24
JBS
C0
1 5
SHEET:
SURVEYOR
SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
SHEET DESCRIPTIONINDEX
CIVIL SHEET LIST
CS-100
1
2
3
PG.
C0 COVER SHEET
5 SITE AND UTILITY DETAILSCD-100
AUGUST 2024
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
DESIGN DRAWINGS
HOOKS AND ARROWS SPORTSMAN SUPPLY
Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
COVER
80
2
S
O
U
T
H
S
E
A
B
R
E
E
Z
E
R
D
.
,
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
8
4
1
2
HO
O
K
S
A
N
D
A
R
R
O
W
S
Ho
o
k
s
a
n
d
A
r
r
o
w
s
Sp
o
r
t
s
m
a
n
S
u
p
p
l
y
,
L
L
C
10
0
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
8
GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY PLANCG-100
PRELIMINARYPLAN
NHC - TRC
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 910-798-5151NEW HANOVER COUNTY ENGINEERING 910-798-7139AQUA NC DEVELOPMENT 919-653-6967DUKE ENERGY DEVELOPER CUSTOMER 1-800-452-2777AT&T ENGINEERING 910-341-7664SPECTRUM ENGINEERING 910-763-4638
(No Scale)
Vicinity and Soils Map
N
E
S
W
Site
CAR
O
L
I
N
A
B
E
A
C
H
R
D
SC
O
U
T
C
A
M
P
STATE
AC
C
E
S
S
R
D
RIV
E
R
R
D
ROSCOE FREEMAN
A
V
E
SEABR
E
E
Z
E
R
D
N
HA
T
I
L
A
R
D
WILMINGTON
SEABREE
Z
E
R
D
S
AVE
TO
BRIDGE TOCAROLINABEACH
CAPESIDE DR
GREEN VALLEY DR
ANCHORVIEW DR
PLA
Y
E
R
WA
Y
GRAND BANKS DR
OCRACOKEDR
SPR
A
Y
-
MIS
T
C
T
HATTERA
S
CT
NA
V
I
G
A
T
O
R
L
N
SALTSPRAY LN
SOUNDSIDE DR
Lynn Haven
Fine Sands
NTS
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
OWNER
Hooks and Arrows Sportsman Supply, LLC100 8th StreetCarolina Beach, NC 28428Dana and Jerry Vess
TIMELESS PROPERTIES CONSTRUCTION
2940 Orville Wright Way, Suite 600Wilmington, NC 28405p: (910) 769-0308Info@timelesspropertiescc.com
4 UTILITY DETAILSCU-101
SignalizedIntersection
CarolinaBeach
To
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
o
a
d
/
S
R
1
5
7
5
N 1
3
°
4
4
'
1
5
"
E
1
0
5
.
0
0
'
S 73°25'2
4
"
E
1
0
5
.
0
0
'
S 1
3
°
4
4
'
1
5
"
W
1
0
5
.
0
0
'
N 73°25'2
4
"
W
1
0
5
.
0
0
'
S Seabr
e
e
z
e
R
o
a
d
/
S
.
R
.
1
5
3
0
(60' Publi
c
R
/
W
)
2-Story R
e
t
a
i
l
n/fWilliam E.
Freeman
D.B. 6565-1678
Zoning: R-15Land Use: Vacant
RiverRoad
20' Setba
c
k
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
/
V
a
c
a
n
t
20'
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
20'
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
20' Stree
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
n/f
William E.
Freeman
D.B. 6565-1678
Zoning: R-15Land Use: Vacant
n/f
Eric Cory &
Annamarie
D.B. 5190-323
Zoning: R-15Land Use: Vacant
Atwood
n/fSOCAL, LLC
D.B. 6585-972
Zoning: (CZD) CBLand Use: Commercial
n/f
SOCAL, LLC
D.B. 6585-972
Zoning: (CZD) CBLand Use: Commercial
Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
/
U
.
S
.
4
2
1
(2
7
0
'
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
/
W
)
n/f
SOCAL, LLC
D.B. 6585-972 Zoning: (CZD) CBLand Use: Commercial
21.5'
50'25'
14.0'
ONE
WAY
22'
R2
5
'
R15'
R20'
R2
0
'
R25'
R12'
R
5
'
R5'
18.0'
8.0'
8.0'9.0'
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
W
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
W
W
W W W
W
W
W
W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
IC
SM
MC
MC
AABG
AABG
MA
MA
IC
SMMC
10' FROM R/W7' FROM R/W
REVISION NO.
PROJ. NO.24105.DLD
OF:
SHEET:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
8.24.24
80
2
S
O
U
T
H
S
E
A
B
R
E
E
Z
E
R
D
.
,
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
8
4
1
2
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
HO
O
K
S
A
N
D
A
R
R
O
W
S
JBS
Ho
o
k
s
a
n
d
A
r
r
o
w
s
Sp
o
r
t
s
m
a
n
S
u
p
p
l
y
,
L
L
C
10
0
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
8
DOGWO O D LD,
P
LLC
205 Sierra DriveWilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
5872-P .CIL CN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
N O R T H
CS100
2 4
SITE, UTILITY,AND PLANTINGPLAN
1" = 20'
(No Scale)
Vicinity and Soils Map
3. Current Zoning District: R-15
2. Tract Area: 11,025 s.f.± (0.25 ac.)
1. New Hanover County Parcel No.:
General Notes:
4. Comprehensive Plan Classification:
Development Notes:
the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. 1. All development shall be in accordance with
Hanover County regulations.2. Project shall comply with all Federal, State & New
N
E
S
W
Community Mixed-Use
313110.36.8275
Development Data:
[PID R8514-004-008-000]
Total Building Area - 1,250 s.f.±
Retail and Private Office Parking - (@ 2.5 spaces / 1000 s.f. GFA)
** Spaces Prov'd. = 5 **
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:
Total - 6,420 s.f.± (58.2%)
Max. Proposed New Building Height - 2-story / 25'
Proposed District - (CZD) CB
Rooftop - 1,350 s.f.±
Walks -4,750 s.f.±
2. This property is not impacted by any AEC.
3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlayresources.
4. This site is not impacted by any recognizedhistoric or archeological significance.
5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site.
6. Existing trees are non-"significant" Pines.No "Specimen" trees were identified.
7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands.
8. There is no evidence of endangered species orhabitat issues on the site.
Site Inventory Notes:
9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard
10. The site runoff will flow into the roadside ditches of
1. Soils: lY (Lynn Haven fine sand)
A detailed tree survey will be providedduring detailed design & permitting.
Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720313100K,dated August 28, 2018.
S. Seabreeze Road, into the ICW watershed.
Utility Notes:
1. Water & sanitary sewer service will be provided byAQUA utilities.
gas & telephone shall be installed underground.2. All utility services, such as electric power, CATV,
Parking Area - 320 s.f.±
Site
CAR
O
L
I
N
A
B
E
A
C
H
R
D
SCO
U
T
C
A
M
P
STATE
ACC
E
S
S
R
D
RIVE
R
R
D
ROSCOE FREEMAN AVE
SEABREEZ
E
R
D
N
HAT
I
L
A
R
D
WILMINGTON
SEABREEZE
R
D
S
AVE
TO
BRIDGE TOCAROLINABEACH
CAPESIDE DR
GREEN VALLEY DR
ANCHORVIEW DR
PLA
Y
E
R
WAY
GRAND BANKS DR
OCRACOKEDR
SPR
A
Y
-
MIST
C
T
HATTERAS
CT
NAV
I
G
A
T
O
R
L
N
SALTSPRAY LN
SOUNDSIDE DR
Proposed Land Use: General Retail Sales
Lynn HavenFine Sands
Building - 1800 GFA / 1000 s.f. GFA = 1.8 Req'd
PRELIMINARYPLAN
1
1
SITE KEYNOTES:
6" HEADER CURB (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
2
CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
3
4
TYPE 2 CURB RAMP (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
6
7
8
9
10
11
PRIVATE LIFT STATION (SEE UTILITY PLANS)
ASPHALT PARKING PAVEMENT (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
4" CONCRETE TURNDOWN WALK (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
ACCESSIBLE SPACE WITH SIGN (TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL)
6-FT SHADOWBOX WOOD FENCE
BIKE RACK (5-SPACE, TYPICAL)
5
WATER SERVICE (SEE UTILITY PLANS)
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT (360-FT HOSE PULL LENGTH TO BUILDING)
1
2
4
5
67
8
8
9
10
11
12 10'x70' NCDOT SITE TRIANGLES
12
12
12
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
2-Story R
e
t
a
i
l
10
11
11
11
9
10
11
ONE
WAY
(EP11.61)
(EP11.30)
(EP11.35)
(EP11.48)
(EP11.66)(EP11.64)
(EP11.10)
(EP11.09)
(EP11.13)
(EP10.99)
(EP11.65)
FFE: 12.
6
0
(EP10.96)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
(EP11.13)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
(EG11.4
PG12.08
EP12.44
TC12.30EP11.80
TC12.44EP11.94
TC12.44EP11.94
TC12.20EP11.70
(EG10.98)
(EG9.74)
PG10.25
(EX. 18"INV 7.97)
PG8.50
15"PPESINV 10.00
15"PPESINV 10.00
EP11.35
EP11.35
EP11.60
PG10.55
PG10.55
EP11.50
EP11.75
TC12.40EP11.90
15"RCPINV 9.50
PG10.15
EP12.30
EP12.30
15"RCPINV 9.50
TC12.30EP11.80
TC12.60EP12.10
FM
FM
10' FROM R/W7' FROM R/W
CURB TRANSITION
CURB TRANSITION
REVISION NO.
PROJ. NO.24105.DLD
OF:
SHEET:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
8.24.24
80
2
S
O
U
T
H
S
E
A
B
R
E
E
Z
E
R
D
.
,
W
I
L
M
I
N
G
T
O
N
,
N
C
2
8
4
1
2
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
HO
O
K
S
A
N
D
A
R
R
O
W
S
JBS
Ho
o
k
s
a
n
d
A
r
r
o
w
s
Sp
o
r
t
s
m
a
n
S
u
p
p
l
y
,
L
L
C
10
0
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
8
DOGWO O D LD,
P
LLC
205 Sierra DriveWilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
5872-P .CIL CN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
N O R T H
CG100
3 5
GRADING,DRAINAGE &UTILITY PLAN
1" = 20'
3. Current Zoning District: R-15
2. Tract Area: 11,025 s.f.± (0.25 ac.)
1. New Hanover County Parcel No.:
General Notes:
4. Comprehensive Plan Classification:Community Mixed-Use
313110.36.8275[PID R8514-004-008-000]
Proposed District - (CZD) CB
PRIVATE ZOELLER SIMPLEX922 PUMP STATION PACKAGE(SEE SPECS)
SWALE #3(SEE DETAILS)
SWALE #1(SEE DETAILS)SWALE #2(SEE DETAILS)
EX. 18" CULVERT FIELD VERIFYWATER ANDSEWER TAPS
RIGHT OFWAY/PROPERTYLINE/EASEMENT LINE
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A18"x30" RECTANGULAR CASTIRON VALVE BOX ASPHALTCOATED MODEL NO. MBX-5AAS MANUFACTURED BYFASTECH, OR EQUAL
2" X 2" COUPLING (COMMERCIAL)
XX" SDR9 CTS FORCEMAIN SERVICETO PUMP STATION
XXX" PVC FORCEMAIN
3
1
NOTES:
1. VEGETATE SWALES ACCORDING TO SEEDING SCHEDULEIMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION.
2. LINER SHALL BE EXCELSIOR MATTING OR COIR FIBERMATTING.
VEGETATE ENTIRE SWALE
1 FT 5
1
VEGETATED SWALE (TEMP. DIVERSION DITCH)NOT TO SCALE
PRELIMINARYPLAN
NHC - TRC
FM SERVICE BOX(SEE DETAILS)WM METER & RPZ(SEE DETAILS)
40LF 15" RCP CULVERT WITH PPES
65LF 15" RCP CULVERT WITH PPES
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: 802 S Seabreeze Road - Hooks and Arrows Sportsman Supply
NCDOT Projects: N/A
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: 2024 Bicycle & Pedestrian Priorities Plan Amendment proposed project:
Carolina Beach Road South 10’ paved multi-use path from Monkey Junction to Snows Cut
Bridge.
TIA: Based on the 11th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual, a TIA is not required.
Land Use (ITE Code) Intensity Unit 24 Hour
Volumes
AM Peak
Hour Trips
PM Peak
Hour Trips
Sporting Goods
Superstore (861) 2,500 SF 59 1 9