HomeMy WebLinkAboutHilton Bluffs TRC Comments
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Allison Engebretson, Paramounte Engineering, aengebretson@paramounte-eng.com
Emily Mattocks, Copper Builders, emily@copperbuilders.com
From: Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC Review
PID#: R00900-001-001-000
Egov# SUBPP-24-0010
Subject: Hilton Bluffs Master Plan and Phase 1 - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Robert Farrell 910-798-7164
1. General Comments
a. The properties are zoned RA which allows a maximum of 1 dwelling unit per acre for
performance residential subdivisions.
b. Reconcile some conflicting numbers in the plans:
i. Page 3 Site Data lists maximum 4,000 units at 0.99 du/ac
ii. The future lot calculations at the bottom result in 4,030, but the page lists 4031.
2. Vesting:
a. Section 3.1.3.D.8.b states developments containing more than 150 dwelling units may
request a public hearing by the Planning Board for a vesting determination.
b. If approved, the vesting would be valid for 5 years and confer the right to develop the
total number of dwelling units approved, and the general type of units in accordance with
the approved site plan.
c. Alternatively, the plans for the remaining phases can be more specific and a preliminary
plan approval issued for the entire site.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 2
3. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. Parking will be required for the amenity area. That will be shown on separate commercial
plans when that proposed structure is reviewed through a separate TRC process.
4. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required as part of the application materials.
b. The TIA will need to be approved by NCDOT and the WMPO before TRC approval is
granted for the Master Plan and Phase 1.
5. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. A separate tree retention permit will need to be submitted through COAST.
b. Given the site of the tract, a plot sampling methodology is recommended.
c. Also given the amount of conservation area that is required, staff recommends using that
as the master tree retention area for the entire project. That will eliminate the need to
chart tree mitigation in each phase of the development.
d. If a master tree retention area is not used to account for any required mitigation, each
phase will be required to show the following in each submitted phase:
i. Total required mitigation for entire project.
ii. Amount of mitigation in each approved phase.
iii. Provided mitigation in submitted phase
iv. Remaining mitigation
6. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. A separate landscaping plan will be required for the amenity area when it is submitted for
permitting.
7. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Streetlights are shown along Sledge Road.
b. A lighting plan for the streetlights will be required with each phase before final plats can
be signed and recorded with the Register of Deeds.
c. Alternatively, a master lighting plan can be submitted for review for the entire site.
8. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. Any subdivision identification signs will need to be reviewed and approved through a
separate permitting process through COAST.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 3
9. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. There 3,072.46 acres of Swamp Forest and Pocosin conservation resources
b. A minimum of 5 acres of a conservation resource triggers additional ordinance
requirements under Section 5.7.
c. Table 5.7.3.A.5 establishes the calculation for determining the minimum amount of
conservation space required. The calculation is the total acreage of the conservation
resource multiplied by 0.5.
i. 3,072.46 acres x 0.5 = 1,536.23 total acres required for conservation.
ii. While Section 5.7 may only require conservation of 1,536.23 acres, the
performance residential standards of Section 3.1.3.D.2 state the total 3,072.46
acres of conservation resources and Class IV soils must be conserved to count
the acreage towards total project density.
d. Table 5.7.4 Additional Performance Controls states that when there are 3 or more acres
of a Swamp Forest or Pocosin conservation resource additional standards are required
under Section 5.7.4.C
i. All structures and impervious surfaces shall be set back 50 feet from the
conservation resource.
1. Phase 1 plan should show the 50-foot setback boundary from the
conservation resources.
ii. On-site retention and percolation areas shall be required for the entire parcel
sufficient to control, at a minimum, the first 0.5 inches of runoff that will originate
from all impervious surfaces anticipated to be on the site upon final development.
The specified amount of runoff from impervious surfaces shall be disposed of by
percolation into the soil, evaporation, transpiration, or other methods of
treatment or handling acceptable to the County Engineering Department.
10. UDO Section 5.8, Open Space Requirements
a. 807 acres of open space required.
b. If all approximately 3,072.46 acres shown in the wetland area of the Master Plan are
conserved as part of the development, it would meet the minimum open space
requirements for the overall project in addition to the 17 acres of the amenity area and
other stormwater features.
11. UDO Article VI Subdivision Design and Improvements
a. Section 6.2.2.A.7.g Street Connectivity Standards
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 4
i. Each phase will need to maintain a minimum link to node ratio of 1.40.
ii. There are 31 links and 19 nodes in Phase 1 of the project. 6/4 = 1.5 which meets
the required street connectivity ratio requirements.
b. Are any traffic calming devices proposed as part of Phase 1? If so, traffic calming devices
will need to be identified on the plan and reviewed and approved as part of the TRC
Preliminary Plan review process.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Please review Typical TRC Comments sent to you via e-mail
2. Need a Fire Hydrant plan
3. How will water supply come from?
4. Fire Flow Analysis required
5. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each development entrance
6. Gate details required - Requires both siren activation and a KNOX Entry System installed.
7. Any chance of coming in off Indian Corn Trail?
8. What will the Front Future Development be?
9. The Clubhouse. What is the square footage be? Will it be sprinklered? If so a fire hydrant shall
be within 100 foot of the FDC.
10. Fire Finals required.
11. These are my comments for now - More to follow as project moves forward.
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 5
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
2. A County stormwater permit issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit applications documentation with requisite review fees to the COAST online
permit portal (https://newhanovercountync-
energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home). Applicable forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/251/Stormwater however the application form is not required as the
information will be gathered by the COAST portal.
3. This parcel qualifies for an exemption to the County’s pre and post storm attenuation
requirements should it be design in accordance with the City and County’s Low Impact Design
(LID) Manual (http://laserfiche.nhcgov.com/weblink/0/edoc/3273331/LID-Manual.pdf). Please
provide requisite documentation for compliance with LID manual and a variance request in
accordance with NHC UDO, Section 7.12 during the County stormwater permitting process. As
park’s parcel’s are developed and impervious area added, each parcel will need submit for a
County stormwater permit and meet the pre and post storm attenuation requirements unless
LID measures are proposed.
4. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a high density
permit will be obtained.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site(s) must connect to public sewer. Soils in this area are poor for septic system use. All
proposed infrastructure such as storm water ponds must maintain setbacks to surrounding
properties existing septic systems.
2. Site must connect to public water or an application and well permit must be obtained from NC
DEQ Public Water Supply section.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. Street names will need to be approved prior to TRC approval. Please send me your list of street
name suggestions with alternatives.
2. Please contact planning for addresses following TRC approval
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision – Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary Plan – TRC Review
Page | 6
Soil & Water Conservation District, Dru Harrison 910-798-7130
1. See attached.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. CFPUA water and sewer available via mainline extension; pump station will also be installed.
5. Capacity is dependent on the analysis of the pipe collection system (gravity and force mains).
6. A capacity determination can be provided upon submittal of the NC DWQ FTA/FTSE Application
Form and a Preliminary Plan, this determination does not guarantee capacity.
7. Capacity is issued to projects on a first come, first serve basis, when capacity is available, the
plans meet Authority requirements, and the NC DWQ FTA/FTSE forms are signed by the
Authority
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. See attached
WMPO, Bill McDow 910-473-5130
1. See attached
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Brad Shaver
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Hilton Bluffs Subdivision
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE
COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Baymeade fine sand (Be), Dorovan soils
(DO), Johnston soils (JO), Kenansville fine sand (Ke), Kureb sand (Kr), Lakeland
sand (La), Leon sand (Le), Murville fine sand (Mu), Onslow loamy fine sand (On),
Rimini sand (Rm), and Borrow Pits (Bp). Disregard the chart on the Soil Survey
showing soils for Pender County, that is due to the drawing of the polygon for the
Area of Interest.
According to the booklet “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for Septic
Tank Suitability,” Kenansville, Kureb, Rimini and Lakeland sand are Class I soils,
Baymeade and Onslow is a Class II soils, Leon and Murville are Class III soils, and
Dorovan and Johnston are Class IV soils. If the borrow pit is filled its classification is
dependent on the material and method of filling.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kureb, Rimini, and Lakeland as
excessively well drained, Baymeade and Kenansville as well drained, Onslow as
somewhat poorly drained, Leon as poorly drained, and Murville, Dorovan, and
Johnston as very poorly drained. There is no determination for a filled borrow pit.
Murville, Doravan, and Johnston soils are on the New Hanover County Hydric Soils
Ä list which means they are possibly wetland areas and subject to regulation under the
Clean Water Act. Kureb, Rimini, and Lakeland are on the Hydric Soils “B” list which
means there may be areas of wetland included in the mapping unit. It should be noted,
according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover County, the limitation for dwellings
with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for all the
soils on this site. The limitations are due to flooding and/or wetness. An adequate
drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the
NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state
jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible
wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with
State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover County, North
Carolina, and Pender
County, North Carolina
Hilton Bluffs Subdivision
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................12
Map Unit Descriptions........................................................................................12
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................15
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes........................................15
Bp—Borrow pits..........................................................................................16
DO—Dorovan soils......................................................................................17
JO—Johnston soils.....................................................................................18
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.......................................19
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes.......................................................20
La—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes..................................................21
Le—Leon sand............................................................................................23
Mu—Murville fine sand................................................................................24
On—Onslow loamy fine sand......................................................................25
Rm—Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes.....................................................26
W—Water....................................................................................................28
Pender County, North Carolina.......................................................................29
Do—Dorovan muck, frequently flooded......................................................29
Jo—Johns fine sandy loam.........................................................................30
KeB—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes.....................................31
W—Water....................................................................................................32
References............................................................................................................33
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
0
2
0
0
0
38
0
3
0
0
0
38
0
4
0
0
0
38
0
5
0
0
0
38
0
6
0
0
0
38
0
7
0
0
0
38
0
8
0
0
0
38
0
9
0
0
0
38
0
2
0
0
0
38
0
3
0
0
0
38
0
4
0
0
0
38
0
5
0
0
0
38
0
6
0
0
0
38
0
7
0
0
0
38
0
8
0
0
0
38
0
9
0
0
0
222000 223000 224000 225000 226000 227000 228000 229000 230000 231000 232000 233000
222000 223000 224000 225000 226000 227000 228000 229000 230000 231000 232000 233000
34° 23' 24'' N
78
°
1
'
3
3
'
'
W
34° 23' 24'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
5
'
'
W
34° 19' 18'' N
78
°
1
'
3
3
'
'
W
34° 19' 18'' N
77
°
5
3
'
5
5
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 2500 5000 10000 15000
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Meters
Map Scale: 1:53,500 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales
ranging from 1:15,800 to 1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil Survey Area: Pender County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 26, Sep 13, 2023
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey
area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at
different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil
properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Be Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6
percent slopes
202.6 3.3%
Bp Borrow pits 14.9 0.2%
DO Dorovan soils 1,716.4 28.2%
JO Johnston soils 1,394.8 22.9%
Ke Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
164.6 2.7%
Kr Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
13.1 0.2%
La Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
77.6 1.3%
Le Leon sand 459.4 7.5%
Mu Murville fine sand 638.3 10.5%
On Onslow loamy fine sand 22.9 0.4%
Rm Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent
slopes
13.3 0.2%
W Water 422.7 6.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 5,140.7 84.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 6,087.3 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Do Dorovan muck, frequently
flooded
626.8 10.3%
Jo Johns fine sandy loam 0.0 0.0%
KeB Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
13.4 0.2%
W Water 305.9 5.0%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 946.1 15.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 6,087.3 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Be—Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Baymeade and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baymeade
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 2 inches: fine sand
E/Bh - 2 to 30 inches: fine sand
Bt - 30 to 40 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 40 to 80 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Minor Components
Lynn haven, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Leon
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Murville, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Torhunta, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Depressions on stream terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, flats
on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bp—Borrow pits
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr2
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents, loamy, and similar soils:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Udorthents, Loamy
Setting
Landform:Ridges
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy mine spoil or earthy fill
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
DO—Dorovan soils
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr4
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dorovan and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dorovan
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Woody organic material
Typical profile
Oe - 0 to 5 inches: muck
Oa - 5 to 85 inches: muck
2Cg - 85 to 95 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 13.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153BY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
JO—Johnston soils
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr5
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cg1 - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Kr—Kureb sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr7
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Kureb and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kureb
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces, rims on carolina bays
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Crest
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 26 inches: sand
C/Bh - 26 to 89 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 1.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
La—Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr9
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
21
Map Unit Composition
Lakeland and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lakeland
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 2 inches: sand
C - 2 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:3 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
22
Le—Leon sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrb
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Leon and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Leon
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: sand
E - 3 to 15 inches: sand
Bh - 15 to 30 inches: fine sand
BE - 30 to 33 inches: fine sand
E' - 33 to 66 inches: fine sand
B'h - 66 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
23
Mu—Murville fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrh
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
Map Unit Composition
Murville, undrained, and similar soils:80 percent
Murville, drained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Murville, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Murville, Drained
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Custom Soil Resource Report
24
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
Bh - 8 to 45 inches: fine sand
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
On—Onslow loamy fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrl
Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Onslow and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Onslow
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Custom Soil Resource Report
25
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy fine sand
E/Bh - 4 to 20 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 20 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 68 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY040NC -
Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rm—Rimini sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrq
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
26
Map Unit Composition
Rimini and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rimini
Setting
Landform:Rims on carolina bays, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Eolian sands and/or sandy fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: sand
E - 4 to 58 inches: sand
Bh - 58 to 80 inches: sand
C - 80 to 88 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY010NC - Dry Sands, F153AY010NC - Dry Sands
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
27
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
28
Pender County, North Carolina
Do—Dorovan muck, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ww6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dorovan and similar soils:80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dorovan
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Woody organic material
Typical profile
Oe - 0 to 5 inches: muck
Oa - 5 to 85 inches: muck
2Cg - 85 to 95 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding:Frequent
Frequency of ponding:Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 13.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: F153BY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY100NC - Flooded Organic Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
29
Jo—Johns fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wwg
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Johns and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Johns
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 7 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 11 to 37 inches: sandy clay loam
2Cg - 37 to 80 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:Rare
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F153AY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
30
Minor Components
Lumbee, undrained
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Backswamps on stream terraces
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:1 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
KeB—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wwj
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
31
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water:100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
32
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
33
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
34
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE
5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Hilton Bluffs – Sledge Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• It is recommended that you reach out to the NCDOT District Office prior to
submitting plans to avoid a redesign of the proposed utilities.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE
5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Required Roadway Improvements:
Once a TIA is approved for the proposed development comments will be made on any
required roadway improvements.
Refer to the NCDOT Roadway Design Manual for help with the design of any roadway
improvements.
Site Plan Comments:
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Refer to the NCDOT Subdivision Manual for design requirements on the proposed
island.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• Show and label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
Show and label all gates with distances to the right of way line.
Label the radii for the driveway proposed driveway/driveways.
• A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed
driveway crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
• Provide auto turn templates for the largest proposed vehicles.
Label the internal protection stem length for the proposed driveway connection.
• Measured from the right-of-way line.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant
Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,
signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'
ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway
Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown
(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGH T T R IAN G LE
10 ' B Y 70 'S I GH T T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT
MIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
DRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
DRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINE
NEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINE
NEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
HILTON BLUFFS
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY
CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED
EXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT
OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM
APPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
CONTACT THESE UTILITIES
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
SHEET INDEX
SEPTEMBER 2024
C-0.0 COVER SHEET
APPROVALS:CONSULTANTS:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT # 23355.PE
APPLICANT:
ENGINEER /
SURVEYOR :
PREPARED BY:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
-
N
O
T
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
HILTON BLUFFS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE
MASTER PLAN
SEPTEMBER 2024
FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAN / MAJOR SUBDIVISION
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
EXISTING CONDITIONSEX-1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE NORTH
140
SITE
HERMITAGE RD
SL
E
D
G
E
R
D
CR
O
W
A
T
A
N
R
D
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
M
C
D
O
U
G
A
L
D
D
R
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
GE
PRELIMINARY PLANC-2.0 - C-2.1
R
U
N
O
F
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
T
E
R
B
R
A
N
C
H
R
U
N
O
F
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
T
E
R
B
R
A
N
C
H
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET
X
X
XXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
W WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WETWETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WE
T
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
31
30
29
28
27
26
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
5354
55
56
57
58
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89 90 91 92 93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
171
170
169
168
167
166
165
164
163
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
155
154
130
129
128
127
126
125
124 123
135
134
133
132
131
144
143
142
141
140
139
138
137
136
153
152
151
150
149
148
147
146
145
122
121 120
119
118 117
116
115
114
113
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
230
229
228
227
226
225
224
192
193
194
195
196
197
191
190
189
188
187
186
185
184
183
182
181
180
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
172
223
222
221
220
219
218
217
216
215
214
213
212
211
210209208207
206
205
204
203
202
201
200
199
198
P
H
A
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
D
PHASE
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 1 SECTION B
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 1 SECTION C
PH
A
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
D
PH
A
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 3 SECTION C
PHAS
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
G
PARK
PARK
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
RESORT-STYLEPOOL
CLUBHOUSE/
SALES
OFFICE
COURTYARD
CREEK
AMENITY
FITNESS
POOL
LAP
POOL
KID'S
POOL
SUN
BATHING
ISLAND SUNSHELF
CREEK
DECK
GRANDLAWN
CABANAS
POOL
TERRACE
RAM
P
POOL
DECK
LAND-
SCAPE
TENNIS/
PICKLEBALL
COURTS
TRAIL
HEAD &
WETLAND
OVERLOOK
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHASE 1 SECTION B
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PH
A
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
PHASE 3 SECTION G
P
H
A
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
P
H
A
S
E
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
G
PHASE 1 SECTION D
PH
A
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
P
H
A
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHA
S
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
SPA
COMMUNITY
SPACES
PHASE
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWW
WWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWW
FM
FM
FM
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
PHAS
E
1
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
N O R T H
ROA
D
A
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NORTH
140
SITE
HERMITAGE RD
OPEN SPACE
REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 807.6 AC (20% X 4038 AC)
PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:± 3,089.81 AC TOTAL PHASE 1;
± 3,072.46 AC WETLANDS, ±17.35 AC
AMENITY IN PHASE 1 (76.5% OF SITE)
INCLUDES AMENITY, WETLANDS);
NHC'S COD CONSERVATION AREA
PRESERVED AS PART OF OPEN SPACE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WILL HAVE ON LOT PARKING FOR 2 OR MORE CARS
AMENITY:
TOTAL REQUIRED: NO REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN UDO
TOTAL PROVIDED: 171 SPACES
RA PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL DIMENSIONAL DATA:
SITE DIMENSIONS PER PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS
MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PER RA ZONING DISTRICT
PERIMETER SETBACK: 20' MIN; ALL LOCATIONS WILL EXCEED THIS BUFFER
BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 40' HT MAX.
BUILDING SEPARATION 10' MIN.
FRONT SETBACK: 5' MIN
SIDE SETBACK: 5' MIN
REAR SETBACK: 10' MIN.
LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES
1. STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG CASTLE HAYNE ROAD THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY
UDO
2. THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY WATER AND WETLANDS ON 3 SIDES OF THE PROPERTY.
VEGETATION WILL REMAIN IN THESE AREAS WITH SELECTIVE CLEARING TO REMOVE DEAD/DYING
MATERIAL AND MAINTAIN VIEW CORRIDOR TO CREEKS AND RIVER AS WELL AS PROMOTE WATER
ACCESS WHERE POSSIBLE.
3. BUFFERS TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WILL FAR EXCEED MINIMUM AMOUNT REQUIRED. THE
WIDTH VARIED, BUT WILL INCORPORATE EXISTING VEGETATION AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPE AS
NEEDED.
SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT LOCATION: SLEDGE ROAD AT CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
PROPERTY OWNERS: SJM HILTON, LLC
BFM HILTON, LLC
ESW HILTON, LLC
DSF HILTON, LLC
JFM HILTON, LLC
PARCEL PINS &DEED BK: R00900-001-001-000 (23.01 AC)
R00900-001-002-000 (23.01 AC)
D.B. 6486, PG. 1782
TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: ± 4,038 ACRES
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ± 4038 MAX UNITS ALLOWED BY-RIGHT
PHASE 1 TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS :230 LOTS PROPOSED THIS PHASE 1
CURRENT ZONING: RA
PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL
FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: COMMUNITY MIXED USE, RURAL RESIDENTIAL, CONSERVATION
FLOOD INFORMATION: PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE AE 8 BFE AND ZONE X
– MINIMAL FLOOD RISK – AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBERS 3720320200K,
3720321000K, 3720321100K, 3720321200K, 3720322000K, 3720322100K, 3720322200K,
3720323100K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007.
WETLAND: INFORMATION: A WETLAND DELINEATION PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING AND IS IN THE REVIEW
PROCESS.
SIDEWALKS
1. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO. ALL
PROJECT ROADS IN RIGHTS OF WAY SHALL HAVE A 5' WIDE SIDEWALK, MINIMUM, ON ONE SIDE OF THE
ROAD.
WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE DISPOSAL WILL BE INDIVIDUAL CARTS AT RESIDENCES EXCEPT DUMPSTERS AT AMENITY CAMPUS..
THIS LOCATION HAS BEEN NOTED ON THE PLAN. ALL TRASH-HANDLING AND RELATED EQUIPMENT SHALL
BE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED AND SCREENED WITH AN OPAQUE FENCE OR WALL. THE ENCLOSURE SHALL
BE AT LEAST ONE (1) FOOT TALLER THAN THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TRASH RECEPTACLE.
DEVELOPMENT NOTES:
1. REFER TO DEVELOPMENT'S MASTER PLAN FOR FULL PHASING INFORMATION.
2. PHASE 1 INCLUDES 4 NEIGHBORHOOD SECTIONS AND THE MAIN AMENITY CAMPUS.
3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING WILL BE ALIGNED WITH PENDING PHASED TIA WITH NO MORE THAN 100 HOMES PROPOSED FOR
CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO A SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD BEING INSTALLED. DEVELOPER WILL WORK WITH NHC FIRE
MARSHAL'S OFFICE TO FURTHER IDENTIFY TIMING AND CONSTRUCTION OF ENTRANCE ROAD.
4. ALL PROJECT ROADS WILL BE PRIVATE, BUILT TO NEW HANOVER COUNTY PRIVATE ROAD STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
5. SOME NEIGHBORHOODS MAY BE GATED. ALL WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH SIREN ACTIVATED OR KNOX BOX/LOCK EQUIPMENT
AND WILL BE APPROVED BY NHC FIRE STAFF PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
6. ALL FUTURE PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND PERMITTING.
7. MASTER DECLARATIONS AND COVENANTS WILL BE DEVELOPED AND FILED WITH NHC.
8. AMENITY CAMPUS WILL BE PHASED WITH THE PRIMARY CLUBHOUSE AND SALES OFFICE DEVELOPED IN THIS FIRST PHASE OF
DEVELOPMENT.
9. ALL EXTERIOR SIGNS TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.6 OF THE UDO.
10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 5.5 OF THE UDO.
11. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS IN PROGRESS AND ALL NCDOT/ WMPO APPROVED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE
INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER IN THE SEQUENCE DETERMINED BY THE FINAL TIA APPROVAL.
12. THE SITE'S UPLANDS ARE IN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT BY PREVIOUS OWNER. AS SUCH, NO SPECIMEN TREES WERE FOUND
IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT UPLAND AREAS; ALL OTHER TREES IN WETLANDS, ETC. WILL BE PRESERVED.. A TREE
REMOVAL PERMIT WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY SIGNIFICANT/REGULATED TRESS REQUIRING REMOVAL OR MITIGATION.
12. CFPUA TO SUPPLY WATER AND SEWER. DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT UTILITY EXTENSIONS TO SERVE PROPERTY.
24' DRIVE AISLE18' PARKING STALL 18' PARKING STALL
FINISHED GRADE
1.5'1.5'
6"6"
24" CURB
GUTTER
STD.ASPHALT
PAVEMENT
1.0% 1.0%
SL
E
D
G
E
R
D
CR
O
W
A
T
A
N
R
D
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
M
C
D
O
U
G
A
L
D
D
R
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
GE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
PHASE LINE
ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
FIRE LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
STREETLIGHT
LEGEND
55
W W W W
SS SS SS
FIRE FIRE
5' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK;
SEE PLAN FOR
LOCATIONS
APPLIES TO AMENITY PARKING
20' ON WAY OR 24' TWO WAY
DRIVEWAY1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
1'
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONE
UNDER CURBING
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
5'1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS
DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING
SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE
AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
24' PRIVATE ROAD
1/2" PER FT1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
1'
50' PRIVATE R/W
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONEUNDER CURBING
1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
7'12'5'1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS
DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING
SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE
AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
SLOPES= 3:1
VARIES
1/2" PER FT1/4" PER FT
MODIFIED VALLEY CURB
SLOPES= 3:1
1'
VARIABLE WIDTH PRIVATE R/W
6"-B25.0B BASE
1/4" PER FT
6" STONE
UNDER CURBING1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE
VARIES VARIES1'
1'1'
PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS
DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVINGSECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE
AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA.
5' WIDE SIDEWALK
VARIES 11'11'
6" STANDARD CURBFOR MEDIAN
2'2'
DRIVEWAY
5' SIDEWALK; SEE
PLAN FOR
LOCATION
5'
SIDEWALK;
SEE PLAN
FOR
LOCATION
1/4" PER FT
11'
26' COLLECTOR ROAD
CONNECTION TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO
USE EXISTING WETLAND CROSSING TYP;
NOT IN THIS PHASE
20' WIDE X 70' DEEP TEMPORARY FIRE
TURNAROUND UNTIL FUTURE ROAD
CONNECTIONS ARE CONSTRUCTED, TYP.
EXISTING VEGETATED AREA OUTSIDE OF
WETLANDS TO BE USED FOR NATURE
TRAILS WHEN POSSIBLE & LINK TO
COMMUNITY-WIDE SIDEWALK/ TRAIL
SYSTEM; LOCATIONS MAY VARY, TYP.
LOTS 1-15 MODEL HOMES
MAIL KIOSK WITH PULL-OFF, TYP.
LARGE ESTATE LOTS RANGE IN SIZE FROM +
±0.5 - 2 AC LOTS, TYP.
ALL LOTS IN PHASE 1 ARE MIXED
STREETSCAPES WITH LOT WIDTHS VARYING
FROM 40' WIDE TO 70' WIDE; LOT DEPTHS
VARY FROM 115' - 135' DEEP. SMALLEST LOT
AREA: 4,600 SF, LARGEST LOT AREA: + 2 AC
SEE MASTER PLAN FOR BREAKDOWN
WETLAND AND STREAM CORRIDOR AND
OPEN SPACE EITHER SIDE PROVIDE NATURE
PARK AS DIVISION BETWEEN PHASE 1 AND
FUTURE PHASE 3
POTENTIAL JURISDICTION AL DITCH PER
SEGI WETLAND DELINEATION; IMPACTS ARE
MINIMIZED TO ALL WETLANDS, DITCHES AND
STREAMS; ALL REMAIN UNLESS SHOWN
OTHERWISE AS ROAD CROSSINGS
STORMWATER POND, TYP.
FUTURE SLEDGE ROAD EXTENSION
END OF SLEDGE ROAD PHASE 1
COMMUNITY PARK AND TRAIL HEAD
ENTRY PARKING AREA FOR GATEHOUSE
GUARDHOUSE & MAIN RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD GATES
PRIVATE DRIVE PULLING HOMES OFF MAIN
COLLECTOR ROAD THROUGH COMMUNITY
ROA
D
B
ROA
D
C
AL
L
E
Y
1
SLE
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
50'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
RO
A
D
D
ROA
D
E
ROA
D
F
ROA
D
G
R
O
A
D
H
ROA
D
I
ROA
D
J
R
O
A
D
E
LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR ALONG MAIN
ENTRANCE ROADWAY
171 PARKING SPACES FOR AMENITY
CAMPUS AND SALES OFFICE
PHASE 1 AMENITY CLUBHOUSE & SALES
OFFICE TO BE CONSTRUCTED; FUTURE
BUILDINGS AND RECREATION AREAS TO
FOLLOW IN FUTURE PHASES; TOTAL
AMENITY CAMPUS + 17 ACRES
WETLANDS, TYP.
PHASE 1 POOL
DROP OFF AND SHORT-TERM PARKING
INDIA
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
ADJACENT EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, TYP.
EXISTING VEGETATED WETLAND BUFFER
ALONG BROADWATER BRANCH TO REMAIN.
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AROUND AMENITY
MAY BE ADDED TO INCREASE BUFFER
WHERE NEEDED; BUFFER WIDTH VARIES
FROM 50' - 300'+
ROAD CONNECTION TO FUTURE PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT
23355.PE
CO
P
P
E
R
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
,
L
L
C
DA
T
E
:
SC
A
L
E
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
PEI JOB#:
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
FI
N
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
DR
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SEAL
CL
I
E
N
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
-
P
H
A
S
E
1
C-2.0
09
.
0
3
.
2
4
1"
=
2
0
0
'
AH
E
AH
E
JR
B
GEOGRID OR GRAVEL ROAD BASE
CONSTRUCTED TO HANDLE EMERGENCY
VEHICLES UP TO 86,000 LBS
SUBGRADE, MINIMAL COMPACTION
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
NOTE: THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PORTION OF
SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD THROUGH WOODED
AREA COULD BE GEOGRID WITH GRAVEL
TOP WITH SOIL AND SOD TO MAKE
REINFORCED ROAD EDGE BLEND INTO
LANDSCAPE; MARKINGS TO INDICATE
ROAD LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY
NHC FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION
FUTURE RESORT
STYLE POOL
0
SCALE:
600'400'200'
1"=200'
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
BOX
CULV
E
R
T
18' UNI
M
P
R
O
V
E
D
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
R
O
A
D
N
C
S
R
2
1
0
6
-
M
C
D
O
U
G
A
L
D
D
R
I
V
E
6
0
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
M.
B
.
1
9
,
P
G
.
5
X
X
X
X
XXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XX
X
OHE
OHE
OHE OHE
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WET
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WE
T
WETWETWETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET WET WET WET WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WETWETWET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WETWET
WET
WET WET WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
PHASE
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
PARK
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
PHA
S
E
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
PHASE
2
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
B
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
HE
OH
E
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
14'0
9
"
E
22'L13 S 71°2
9
'
2
1
"
E
84.35'
S 6
1
°
1
9
'
2
0
"
E
85.
9
3
'
9
2
.
2
7
'
S
4
2
°
4
1
'
3
4
"
E
8
8
.
0
0
'
C1
N 5
9
°
1
1
'
3
7
"
W
-
3
6
1
.
8
1
'
(
T
O
T
A
L
)
240
.
6
3
'
BO
X
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
ACCESS EASEMENT
D.B. 6486, PG. 1782
12
1
.
1
8
'
ACCESS & DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
D.B. 806, PG. 729
D.B. 856, PG. 800
S
4
7
°
2
3
'
0
4
"
E
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
F
M
F
M
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
FM
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
N O R T H
0
SCALE:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
PHASE LINE
ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
FIRE LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
STREETLIGHT
LEGEND
55
W W W W
SS SS SS
FIRE FIRE
1"=200'
200' 400' 600'
SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD CONNECTING TO DEKKER RD; SIREN OR KNOX BOX GATED ROAD
FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY; DEVELOPER TO WORK WITH COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL TO
DESIGN TO COUNTY AND STATE STANDARDS; SEE DETAIL SHEET C-2.0
N O R T H
MAIN PROJECT ACCESS
ROAD; REALIGN EXISTING
SLEDGE ROAD; CONSTRUCT
TO COUNTY ROAD
STANDARDS
EXISTING SLEDGE ROAD IMPROVED WITHIN EXISTING ACCESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT; ROAD WILL BE DESIGNED & CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PENDING NCDOT REVIEW/APPROVAL OF TIA
ENTRY MEDIAN WITH MONUMENT SIGN OUTSIDE OF CASTLE HAYNE RIGHT OF WAY
ENTRY MONUMENT STRUCTURE & SIGN WITH LANDSCAPE
SURROUNDING; PERMITTED SEPARATELY
SLEDGE ROAD REALIGNED WITHIN A NATURAL & LANDSCAPED CORRIDOR
SIREN OR KNOX BOX GATES SO NO THROUGH TRAFFIC USES SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD.
PRIMARY COMMUNITY ACCESS - SLEDGE ROAD AT CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 60'
ENTRY MONUMENT STRUCTURE & SIGN WITH LANDSCAPE
SURROUNDING; PERMITTED SEPARATELY
UTILITY EXTENSIONS ANTICIPATED THESE LOCATIONS; PENDING CFPUA
REVIEW AND COORDINATION
PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR SITE MAIN ENTRANCE INCLUDES FULL
MOVEMENT INGRESS, DEDICATED LEFT & RIGHT TURN LANES; TIA
APPROVAL WILL DICTATE FINAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND NCDOT
WILL REVIEW AND APPROVAL DRIVEWAY DESIGN
SL
E
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
50'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
SLE
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
50'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
100
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
CAS
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
100
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
D
E
K
K
E
R
R
D
6
0
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
O
W
BERG L
N60' PUB
L
I
C
R
O
W
DIRCK
R
D
.
10' WIDE NON-MUNICIPAL UTILITY EASEMENT EITHER SIDE OF ALL RIGHT
OF WAYS THIS DEVELOPMENT EXCEPT IN NARROW PART OF SLEDGE
ROAD ENTRANCE BETWEEN GE AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD
23355.PE
CO
P
P
E
R
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
,
L
L
C
DA
T
E
:
SC
A
L
E
:
DE
S
I
G
N
E
D
:
DR
A
W
N
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
:
PEI JOB#:
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
L
A
Y
O
U
T
:
FI
N
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
:
RE
L
E
A
S
E
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
DR
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SEAL
CL
I
E
N
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
-
P
H
A
S
E
1
C-2.1
09
.
0
3
.
2
4
1"
=
2
0
0
'
AH
E
AH
E
JR
B
STREETLIGHT, TYP.
MAIN RESIDENTIAL
ENTRANCE, TYP.
IMPROVED &
REALIGNED SLEDGE
ROAD, TYP.
LANDSCAPE BUFFER &
TRAIL AREA BETWEEN ROW
AND PROPERTY LINE
SHARED PROPERTY LINE
WITH GE
WETLANDS ALONG EXISTING CREEK
PHASE LINE, TYP.
EXISTING OLD
POWERLINE
EASEMENT TO BE
ABANDONED IF
THIS AREA
DEVELOPED IN
FUTURE
FUTURE RESIDENT'S ACCESS; GATED
MAIN ENTRANCE
GATEHOUSE,, TYP.
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: Sledge Road at Castle Hayne Road – Hilton Bluffs Master Plan
Comments:
• A TIA will be required prior to additional comments being provided.
• 4,031 dwelling units noted on the site plan and was the number utilized for trip
generation.
NCDOT Projects:
• U-5863: NC 133/Castle Hayne Road widening from I-140/US 17 bypass to SR
1310/Division Drive. This project is currently unfunded but, is scheduled to occur within a
mile of the site location.
• I-6037: pavement and bridge rehabilitation on I-140 from US 421 to I-40 schedule for
construction in 2028 and will occur within a mile of the site location.
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: Based on the 11th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual, a TIA is required. A scoping
document must be submitted to Abby Lorenzo (abby.lorenzo@wilmingtonnc.gov) to begin the
TIA process.
Land Use (ITE Code) Intensity Unit 24 Hour
Volumes
AM Peak
Hour Trips
PM Peak
Hour Trips
Single Family Detached
Housing (210) 4,031 DUs 30,261 2,153 3,209