HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRC Comments and ResponsesComments and Responses per the TRC Review docs sent from Zachary Dickerson
1. General Comments
a. Zoning is I-2, use is by-right in the I-2 district
b. I went ahead and included the page showing the parking layout in the
document with the rest of the site plan.
c. Will there be an employee/security on-site?
i. Only cameras and gate access control.
d. Per Bill Wilder with Duke Energy, the large easement on the site will prevent
the site from being developed as planned on this site plan. Please confirm
with Mr. Wilder on how to proceed with the development of this site
i. Zach Dickerson has approval from Bill Wilder that we are not
encroaching onto his property and has no comments.
2. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. a. If there is intended to be an employee on site, where will they park?
i. No
3. UDO Section 5.2, Tra2ic, Access and Connectivity
a. Please note that no building permit for any structure shall be issued which
requires NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the
permit approval. Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for
building permit.
i. No building permit needed
4. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. a. It does not appear that there are any trees on the site- please confirm.
i. Confirmed
b. b. If there are any trees to be removed on site, please apply for a tree removal
permit.
i. NA
5. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Bu2ering
a. The UDO requires 15 trees to be planted or preserved per acre disturbed.
Because there are no trees on site to retain, they will need to be planted
somewhere on site.
i. Proposed on revised layout
b. b. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for street
yard plantings.
i. No street yard plantings required
6. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. a. Is any lighting planned for this site?
i. Yes, through Duke Energy
b. b. If so, please submit a lighting plan for this site- it is not required prior to
TRC approval but will be required to other permits being issued.
i. Attached- we already have a standalone electrical permit for the
project
7. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. a. For any signs on the site, please submit for a sign permit, referencing
Section 5.6 of the UDO for standards.
i. No sign proposed
8. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. Per the New Hanover County Conservation Resource map, there are no
Conservation Resources on the property.
i. Nothing needed here
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Fire Finals Required
a. Understood – Specifically to check the knox box that will be attached to my
gate access.
2. Portable fire extinguisher requirement per NCFPA 10
a. Understood
3. Install a fire hydrant on the roadway within 250 feet of the project. At the gate if
possible across the street from the gate is also allowable.
a. It has been determined that we already have one and it is identified on the
attached layout.
4. Get permission to store vehicles, boats, campers, etc. under the power lines from
Duke Energy or the owner of the power line. Present letter to TRC.
a. Zachary Dickerson has communicated extensively with Bill Wilder from Duke
Energy and Bill has confirmed the revised layout does not need his approval
because we do not encroach onto his property.
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County
issued permit directly to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be
found at https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.Boat and RV
Storage – 310 Metro Circle – TRC Review
a. We already have this. Attached
2. 2. The NHC stormwater ordinance is not applicable as the site has a master
stormwater permit. A plan revision consisting of a site plan and applicable
calculations for stormwater conveyance, if proposed, will be required.
a. No storm proposed
3. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a
modification to SW8 001005 permit with will be required.
a. No storm proposed
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Septic and well review is not necessary since there are no structures proposed on
this parcel.
a. No action needed here
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. No comments.
a. No action needed here
NHC Soil & Water, Brian Dadson 910-798-7138
1. See attachment.
a. No action needed here
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
a. No action needed here
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA
a. No Utilities, no action needed here
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review
package, upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-
3/Engineering-PlanReview-103.
a. No action needed here
4. CFPUA water available
a. No action needed here
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. No comments
a. No action needed here
WMPO, Greer Templer 910-341-0107
1. See attachment.
a. No action needed here
Army Corps of Engineers, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611
1. No comments.
a. No action needed here