HomeMy WebLinkAbout4737 Castle Hayne Road TRC DLD Resp.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 1
To: Rick and Deanne Meadows, meadowsd@earthlink.net
From: Zach Dickerson, Senior Planner
Date: October 2, 2024 TRC
PID#: R01700-002-007-000
Egov# SITECN-24-000039
Subject: 4737 Castle Hayne Road – Meadows Commercial - TRC Review
The following comments have been received for the October 2, 2024, TRC meeting. Additional comments
may be made upon further review of subsequent revisions.
Please note: following the TRC meeting, a revised preliminary plan addressing each of the below items
must be resubmitted prior to receiving preliminary plan approval.
Planning, Zach Dickerson 910-798-7450
1. General Comments
a. Zoning is (CZD) B-2, per rezoning Z24-05
b. Please include the conditions of the rezoning approval on the site plan. This can be under
the site notes:
i. The proposed rezoning’s principal use shall be limited to: Animal Grooming
Services, Contractor Office (with no outdoor storage), Offices for Private Business
& Professional Activities, Instructional Services & Studios, Personal Services,
General Retail Sales, Minor Vehicle Service Station, and Warehousing.
ii. The attached shed that encroaches into the rear setback is to be removed, bringing
Dad’s Tire Store into compliance with required setbacks.
iii. A septic and well easement approved by New Hanover County Environmental
Health shall be recorded with the register of Deeds guaranteeing access and
maintenance for the existing septic system and any future improvements.
Environmental Health approval of the septic system and well shall be required
prior to issuance of construction permits for the flex commercial space.
iv. Exterior lighting including luminaries and security lighting shall be fully cutoff
fixtures that are directed downward in compliance with Figures of the UDO. In no
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 2
case shall lighting be directed at or above a horizontal plane through the lighting
fixture.
v. The two Significant trees identified on the concept plan shall be permanently
retained on site.
c. Please submit for a demolition permit for the shed on the rear of the property. The
demolition permit shall be granted prior TRC approval.
d. Please confirm width of sidewalk- 5’ minimum is required.
2. UDO Section 5.1, Parking and Loading
a. Please confirm whether the two garage spaces will be publicly accessible?
3. UDO Section 5.2, Traffic, Access and Connectivity
a. Please note that no building permit for any structure shall be issued which requires
NCDOT approval for a Driveway Permit until NCDOT has issued the permit approval.
Evidence of approval shall accompany the application for building permit.
4. UDO Section 5.3, Tree Retention
a. Site plan shows the two significant trees, 32” live oak and 48” water oak as retained on
site per the condition. Thanks!
b. If there are any trees to be removed on site, please apply for a tree removal permit.
5. UDO Section 5.4, Landscaping and Buffering
a. To use the existing site vegetation to meet the requirements, you can include pictures
with the submittal and we can generally verify that it will be sufficient from pictures.
Thanks for including existing plantings!
b. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for street yard plantings.
c. Please include square footage calculations on the site data table for foundation plantings.
6. UDO Section 5.5, Lighting
a. Typically, a lighting plan is not required for TRC approval, but because lighting was a
condition of the rezoning approval, we will hold TRC approval until the lighting plan can
be reviewed and approved.
7. UDO Section 5.6, Signs
a. For any signs on the site, please submit for a sign permit, referencing Section 5.6 of the
UDO for standards.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 3
8. UDO Section 5.7, Conservation Resources
a. Per the New Hanover County Conservation Resource map, there are no Conservation
Resources on the property.
NHC Fire Services, Ray Griswold 910-798-7448
1. Fire Finals Required
2. Please follow Chapter 33 – Safety during Construction and Demolition
3. Fire extinguishers required per NFPA 10
NHC Engineering, Galen Jamison 910-798-7072
1. A land disturbing issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally submit the
permit application documentation with requisite review fees for County issued permit directly
to gjamison@nhcgov.com. Application and forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/249/Sediment-Erosion-Control.
2. A County stormwater permit issued by the County is required for this project. Please digitally
submit the permit applications documentation with requisite review fees to the COAST online
permit portal (https://newhanovercountync-
energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home). Applicable forms can be found at
https://www.nhcgov.com/251/Stormwater however the application form is not required as the
information will be gathered by the COAST portal.
3. Please contact the State for the stormwater permit requirements. It is assumed a high density
permit will be obtained.
NHC Environmental Health, Dustin Fenske 910-798-6732
1. Site plan reflects connection to a septic system. Prior to building permit issuance septic
application must be submitted and permits issued. NHC Environmental Health and some local
Private Soil Scientists can issue said permits. Area for proposed septic system has significant
issues due to old drain field areas and tank areas for both the business and old home (which
cannot be used). Soils in this area are also problematic for septic system installations. It was
mentioned, in the rezoning, that a septic contractor looked at this area and determined it was
suitable for multiple businesses to install a new septic system. It is highly suggested that a soil
scientist consultant evaluate the area for viability of a septic system prior investing further
efforts for development.
2. The shared septic system must also have deeded legal easements issued and tri-party
agreements issued and recorded prior to building permit issuance.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 4
3. Site plan reflects connection to a private well. Any old wells on this property must be properly
abandoned by a certified well driller. New wells must have a well application and well permit
issued by NHC Environmental Health prior to building permit issuance. Wells for businesses
must maintain 100' of separation between the septic system and well location.
4. A shared well between two separate parcels will require easements and tri-party agreements
for water access and well repairs.
NHC Addressing, Katherine May 910-798-7443
1. Each suite will need a unit address. Please contact planning for address following TRC approval.
NHC Soil & Water, Brian Dadson 910-798-7138
1. See attachment.
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Bernice Johnson 910-332-6620
1. CFPUA TRC Comments provided are preliminary comments only.
2. Utility Plan review required by CFPUA.
3. CFPUA is moving toward becoming paperless. When ready to submit plan review package,
upload all documents to https://www.cfpua.org/FormCenter/Engineering-3/Engineering-Plan-
Review-103.
4. There is no CFPUA water and sewer available.
NCDOT, Nick Drees 910-343-3915
1. See attachment
WMPO, Greer Templer 910-341-0107
1. See attachment
Army Corps of Engineers, Brad Shaver 910-251-4611
1. No comment.
Meadows Commercial – 4737 Castle Hayne Road – TRC Review
Page | 5
Comments not received at this time from:
Emergency Services & E911, Steve Still
NCDEQ, Chad Coburn
USACE, Rachel Capito
NCDEMLR, Dan Sams
DCM, Tanya Pietila
TO: New Hanover County Planning Department, September 20th, 2024
FROM: Dru Harrison, Director
RE: Castle Hayne Road - 4737 - Dad's Tire Flex Space
I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAN AS REQUESTED AND HAVE THESE COMMENTS: The soils are predominantly Kenansville fine sand (Ke), Seagate fine
sand (Se), Woodington fine sandy loam (Wo), and Wrightsboro fine sandy loam (Wr).
According to the booklet, “Wilmington/New Hanover Classification of soils for
Septic Tank Suitability”, Kenansville are Class I soils and Seagate, Woodington, and Wrightsboro are Class II soils.
The Soil Survey of New Hanover County lists Kenansville as well drained, Wrightsboro as moderately well drained, Seagate as somewhat poorly drained, and
Woodington as poorly drained.
Woodington is on the New Hanover County Hydric Soils A list which means they are
possibly wetland areas and subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. Seagate is on the Hydric Soils B list, which means it may contain areas of wetland. It should be
noted, according to the Soil Survey of New Hanover County, the limitation for dwellings with or without basements and for small commercial buildings is severe for
all of the soils on this site. The limitations are due to flooding and/or wetness. An adequate drainage and maintenance plan is needed for suitable housing.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has federal jurisdiction over 404 Permits and the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, has state jurisdiction over 401 Permits under the Clean Water Act. Before disturbing possible wetland areas, developers should contact these agencies to stay in compliance with State and Federal regulations.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
New Hanover
County, North
Carolina
Castle Hayne Road - 4737 - Dad's
Tire Flex Space
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 20, 2024
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
New Hanover County, North Carolina.............................................................13
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.......................................13
Se—Seagate fine sand...............................................................................14
Wo—Woodington fine sandy loam..............................................................15
Wr—Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes...........................17
References............................................................................................................19
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
38
0
3
3
7
0
38
0
3
4
0
0
38
0
3
4
3
0
38
0
3
4
6
0
38
0
3
4
9
0
38
0
3
5
2
0
38
0
3
5
5
0
38
0
3
5
8
0
38
0
3
3
7
0
38
0
3
4
0
0
38
0
3
4
3
0
38
0
3
4
6
0
38
0
3
4
9
0
38
0
3
5
2
0
38
0
3
5
5
0
232170 232200 232230 232260 232290 232320 232350 232380 232410 232440 232470
232140 232170 232200 232230 232260 232290 232320 232350 232380 232410 232440 232470
34° 20' 20'' N
77
°
5
4
'
4
2
'
'
W
34° 20' 20'' N
77
°
5
4
'
2
8
'
'
W
34° 20' 13'' N
77
°
5
4
'
4
2
'
'
W
34° 20' 13'' N
77
°
5
4
'
2
8
'
'
W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,540 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 13, 2023
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 8, 2022—Dec 1,
2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ke Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
0.5 9.2%
Se Seagate fine sand 2.4 48.4%
Wo Woodington fine sandy loam 0.8 15.3%
Wr Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes
1.4 27.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 5.0 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
New Hanover County, North Carolina
Ke—Kenansville fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wr6
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Kenansville, moderately wet, and similar soils:90 percent
Minor components:2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Kenansville, Moderately Wet
Setting
Landform:Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 24 inches: fine sand
Bt - 24 to 36 inches: sandy loam
BC - 36 to 42 inches: loamy sand
C - 42 to 84 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: F153BY030NC - Dry Loamy Rises and Flats, F153AY030NC - Dry
Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Minor Components
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Concave
Across-slope shape:Linear
Ecological site:F153AY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces,
F153BY090NC - Flooded Mineral Soil Floodplains and Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Se—Seagate fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wrr
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 270 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seagate and similar soils:85 percent
Minor components:5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Seagate
Setting
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and/or marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sand
E - 8 to 12 inches: fine sand
Bh - 12 to 28 inches: fine sand
E' - 28 to 36 inches: fine sand
Bt - 36 to 40 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 40 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F153AY050NC - Moist Spodosol Rises and Flats, F153BY050NC
- Moist Spodosol Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit:5 percent
Landform:Flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Ecological site:F153BY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions,
F153AY070NC - Wet Spodosol Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wo—Woodington fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ws0
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Woodington, drained, and similar soils:80 percent
Woodington, undrained, and similar soils:10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Woodington, Drained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 14 inches: fine sandy loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Btg - 14 to 74 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 74 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Woodington, Undrained
Setting
Landform:Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, depressions on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Concave
Parent material:Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 14 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg - 14 to 74 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 74 to 85 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: F153AY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions,
F153BY060NC - Wet Loamy Flats and Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Wr—Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3ws1
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wrightsboro and similar soils:90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wrightsboro
Setting
Landform:Ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Loamy and clayey fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 24 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 24 to 48 inches: sandy clay loam
2Bg - 48 to 80 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F153AY040NC - Moist Loamy Rises and Flats
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
19
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.R. “JOEY” HOPKINS
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Memorandum
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: September 17, 2024
Subject: Dads Tire Shop – 4737 Castle Hayne Road
________________________________________________________________________
These are preliminary comments and are based on the plans as submitted for the proposed
site. They are subject to further review upon receipt of any additional information.
Subsequently, additional comments and/or requirements may be necessary for this site.
General Comments:
NCDOT Driveway Permits, and Encroachments are submitted through the NCDOT
Online Portal.https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/help.aspx
NCDOT Driveway Permit:
An NCDOT Driveway Permit is required. Submit plans in accordance with pages 14 and
15 of the Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways to include
access locations within 500’ of the proposed access on both sides of the State Road.
Submit to the local NCDOT District Engineer’s Office.
• Refer to the NCDOT checklist (included) for required documents and site plan
information.
NCDOT Encroachment Agreement:
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any utility connections or
installations within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
• Refer to the NCDOT UAM Manual and the NCDOT encroachment checklist for
required documents and site plan information.
An NCDOT Encroachment Agreement is required for any sidewalk or multi-use paths
installed within the NCDOT right-of-way (form 16.6).
Mailing Address: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3 ENGINEER’S OFFICE 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 04-11-03 COURIER
Telephone: 910-398-9100 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location: 5911 OLEANDER DRIVE, SUITE 101 WILMINGTON, NC 28403
Site Plan Comments:
Provide positive drainage in the right of way along both parcels.
Include/update the NCDOT Standard Drawings (2024) that are applicable to the
development.
Sight Triangles and Sight Distance:
• Show and label the 10’ X 70’ NCDOT sight triangles.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the NCDOT sight triangles.
• Show and label the stopping sight distance.
o No obstructions shall be placed within the stopping sight distance.
• The proposed fence on Sondey Road should not interfere with the sight
triangles/distance.
Show and label all gates with distances to the right of way line.
The radii for the driveway proposed driveway should be 30’ min.
• A radius encroachment letter will be required if the radius of the proposed
driveway crosses the adjoining property line.
• Make sure to accommodate the largest proposed vehicle.
Label the internal protection stem length for the proposed driveway connection.
• Measured from the right-of-way line.
You can coordinate with the district office with any questions 910-398-9100.
NCDOT | Division 3 | District 3 Project Name:_____________________________ Date:_______________
Applicant Checklist NCDOT Checklist
Driveway Application Process and Site Plan Requirements
ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY COMPLETE AND DETAILED SITE PLANS THAT ADHERE TO THE POLICIES LISTED IN THE POLICY ON STREET AND
DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS AND THIS DOCUMENT. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THESE POLICIES WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THE
APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT FOR REVISION.
***THE NCDOT WILL NOT BEGIN THE REVIEW PROCESS ON INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS***
Electronic Pre-Submittals
In an effort to save time and resources, we are happy to provide an initial assessment of a driveway permit submittal’s plans via email to
identify any major issues up front. This initial assessment can be followed up with a submittal of one digital copy of the plans along with all
other required documents.
All Permit applications shall be submitted through the online portal https://connect.ncdot.gov/site/Permits/Pages/default.aspx
In the notify email section of the portal application please include the District Office email (Div3Dist3@ncdot.gov). See the last pages for further instruction.
Online resources:
•NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/Roadway/RoadwayDesignAdministrativeDocuments/Policy%20on%20Street%20an
d%20Driveway%20Access.pdf
•NCDOT Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway Rights of Way:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/Pages/UtilitiesManuals.aspx
•Electronic Forms Database:
https://connect.ncdot.gov/Pages/default.aspx
1)
a.Cover Letter
Include contact information for applicant and engineer, including email address, mailing address, and phone
number. Include the parcel number(s), description of all phases of the development and future land uses to be
served by the permit, and a description of the adjoining land owned or controlled by the applicant.
b.NCDOT Street and Driveway Access Permit Application (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/BusinessForms/TEB-65-04.doc
c.$50.00 Inspection Fee Per Access Point
Attach to Permit Application form (not applicable for municipalities, churches, and schools)
d.NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Certification (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/NPDESstatement.doc
e.Verification of Compliance with Environmental Regulations (form downloadable via link below)
https://connect.ncdot.gov/municipalities/Utilities/EncroachmentForms/VCER-1.pdf
f.Site Plans (to include the “Master Plan” of a tract even if only a small portion is being developed first) Additional
site plan requirement details can be found in section 2 of this document.
g.Design Plan Requirements for projects involving roadway improvements
If roadway improvements are required as part of the permit, then roadway plans, pavement marking plans,signing plans, and traffic control plans will be required - See Section 6 for more information
Y N n/a
Engineering Studies
The applicant may be required by the District Engineer to submit studies based on, but not limited to, the parameters outlined
herein. If study requirements of the local government agency are more restrictive than the NCDOT requirements, then local
government requirements will govern. However, this does not imply that the NCDOT is obligated to approve entrance designs
that are too constrictive to allow smooth and safe traffic flow. All studies including, but not limited to, Traffic Impact Analyses
(TIA), traffic signal studies, and drainage studies, must be prepared under the direct charge of and sealed by a North Carolina
licensed Professional Engineer.
Section 1: Requi
red Documents
|Required documents to accompany all Initial Driveway Application Submittals
Please note that these are the minimum requirements of all driveway permit applications.
All required documentation shall be submitted through the online portal as PDF files, with the exception of the
Performance and Indemnity Bond and the $50 Inspection Fee(s), these should be mailed or delivered to 5501
Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429.
If a Traffic Impact Analysis and/or roadway improvements are deemed necessary as a condition of the permit, there
may be additional submittal materials required.
State of North Carolina | Department of Transportation | Division 3 | District 3
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Form Updated 10/15/2021 (910) 398-9100 T NCDOT Permit #___________________
Y N n/a
Section 1: Required Documents (continued)
2)Required documents to accompany all Driveway Applications PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL
a.Site Plans
One (1) digital copy (PDF) unless otherwise requested by the District Office. Additional site plan requirement
details can be found in section 2 of this document.
b.Performance and Indemnity Bond Information/Forms
See last page of document for bond information and forms
c.Performance and Indemnity Bond Amount
100% of the cost of the work within NCDOT Right-of-Way (R/W) based on the attached estimate determined by
the applicant's engineer and approved by the District Engineer. Bond hold letter required for for municipalities,
churches, and schools. See pages 101-105 in the Policies and Procedures for Accommodating Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way for acceptable bond types
d.Radius Encroachment Letter (if applicable)
If driveway radius encroaches on the frontage of an adjacent property, a Radius Encroachment will be required
e.Hold Harmless Letter (if applicable)
If the Permit is within the limits of an active NCDOT project, a Hold Harmless letter from the NCDOT contractor will
be required. If the project is in preconstruction, coordinate with the Department's Project Development Unit
Section 2: General Site Plan Requirements | All site plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
Page numbers reference the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways
1)Drawn to a scale of 20, 30, 40, or 50 feet per inch and the scale shall be shown
2)North arrow, vicinity map, date of plan, and date of most-recent revision if applicable
3)Contact information of applicant and engineer, including mailing address, phone number, and email address
4)Show R/W lines, highway control of access, and property lines
5)All existing utilities (including handholes) and easements
6)R/W width
7)Existing posted speed limit(s) and design speed limit(s)
8)Show all property lines, intersections, signals, signal loops, railroads, or crossovers within 500’ in all directions of
the property lines of the proposed development
9)Show location of sidewalks, crosswalks, greenways, multi-use paths, curb ramps, railroads, bus stops, and any
other relevant transportation facilities in the development area
10)Include a plan sheet showing full site build-out and land use
11)Buildings shown with “gross leasable area”
12)Width of property frontage
13)Distance from R/W to buildings and gasoline service islands
14)Distance from R/W to existing/proposed Edge of Pavement (EOP) (pages 32 & 34)
15)All streams, bridges, retaining walls, signs, or other fixed objects such as trees, utility poles, traffic signals, etc.
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements
|
All driveway plans shall include and show, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Provide comprehensive survey within the existing R/W on both sides of the road for a distance of 500’ in all
directions from the development’s property lines. Provide additional hydraulic survey data to the nearest storm
water inlet/outlet including ditch lines and storm water pipes, if located outside of the 500' distance.
2)Lane configurations and widths of all existing and proposed driveways, roadways, and adjacent roadways
3)All driveway widths (2-way: 20’ minimum, 36’ maximum | 1-way: 12’ minimum, 24’ maximum | with island: 14'ingress, 18' egress) (pages 50 & 77)
4)Driveway Profile - In shoulder sections, maintain minimum 2% fall from edge of travel way for required
shoulder width distance Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)All existing and/or proposed driveway radii (20’ minimum, 50’ maximum, 30’ typical) (pages 34 & 51)
In curb and gutter sections, use City of Wilmington flare (SD 3-03.3) - (see attached)
In shoulder sections, show grades at the EOP and centerline
6)No curbing is allowed within NCDOT R/W along shoulder sections except as part of a driveway island (page 31)
7)Driveway angles of approach to existing roadway (90° preferred, 75°-90° required for 2-way driveways, 45°-90°
allowed for right-in/right-out on a case-by-case basis) (page 51)
8)Driveway Profile (pages 42- 43)
Y N n/a Y N n/a
□□ □□ □ □
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Section 3: Driveway Plan Requirements (continued)
9)Driveway Pavement Cross Section (to be in place from EOP to edge of R/W)
Asphalt: 8” ABC stone and 1.5” S9.5B
Concrete: 6” of concrete
10)Driveway Offset (driveway EOP to property line; page 75): Minimum: 20’
11)Corner Clearance (radius point to radius point; page 52)Minimum: 50’ Desirable: 100’ or Municipal std.
12)Minimum 10’x70’ sight triangles at driveways (measured from and along the R/W line) (page 31)
13)Sight Distance (length of sight-distance in both directions shown for each driveway; pages 27-29)
14)Driveways should be aligned with existing opposing driveways or correct offset should be provided (pages 40-41)
15)Distance between driveways being requested (if applicable; page 51)
16)Minimum internal storage areas with specified queues (pages 31-33)
17)Minimum protected driveway stem(s) provided and indicated (pages 33-34)
18)Indicate any gated entrances (100’ minimum setback from R/W required) - traffic queuing study may be required
|
Section 6: Roadway Plan Requirements
If off-site improvements are required, roadway plans shall show, at a minimum, the items below
1)Full width typical sections must be shown (paved shoulders to match the typical section of the adjacent roadway)
2)Minimum Asphalt Typical Section (for turn lanes and/or paved shoulders)
Adjacent recently-completed or upcoming TIP projects w/ different typical sections may supersede those below
•Primary Routes (US & NC) and Secondary Routes with Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ≥10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 3” I19.0C, 1.5” S9.5C; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5C
•Secondary Routes with AADT<10,000
5.5” B25.0C, 1.5” S9.5B; any overlay of existing pavement is to be a minimum of 1.5” S9.5B
3)Pavement overlay is required if modification of existing pavement markings and/or lanes is necessary
The grinding of pavement markings will not be allowed
4)Shoulder Widths (Paved + Unpaved) Primary: 8’ minimum | Secondary: 6’ minimum
5)Ditch Slopes - front and back slopes - minimum 3:1 or flatter
6)Indicate existing roadway grade
7)All taper lengths and deceleration lengths should be appropriately designed for the given design speed (page 78)
8)All turn lanes should be designed according to the Driveway Manual and Roadway Standard Drawings (page 79)
See 1205.04 Sheets 1 & 2 and 1205.05 Sheet 1 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
9)Pavement marking and signing plans are required - plans must be approved by Division Traffic Services
10)Traffic control plans are required - Detailed phasing plans may be required based on project type and location
11)New and/or revised signal plans must be included for new installations and if signal modifications are required
All signal plans must be reviewed and approved by Division Traffic Services and the Signal Design Unit. A Traffic
Agreement must be completed to facilitate the review. Contact Division Traffic Services at (910) 341-2200.
|
Section 4: Drainag e Requirements
All drainage features on NCDOT Right-of-Way shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
Section 5: Internal Circ ulation Requirements
|All internal circulation details shall adhere to, at a minimum, the items listed below
1)Interior driveway channelization stems
Minimum 100’ from the ROW or at the discretion of the District Engineer
2)Traffic flow pattern
3)Traffic control devices
4)Pavement Markings
Y N n/a Y N n /a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
Y N n/a Y N n/a
1)Pipe Cover Minimums (measured from top of pipe to subgrade)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 24” | Corrugated Aluminum (CAP): 12” | Reinforced Concrete (RCP): 12”
2)Pipe End Treatment (see Roadway Design Manual 5-20, B-2)
Pipes ≤24" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require Parallel Pipe End Sections See 310.02 and
310.04 of the Roadway Standard Drawings for details
Pipes >30" on multilane highways posted above 45mph require guardrail
Pipes ≥36" require an endwall on the inlet end
3)All proposed Drainage is to be provided inside existing R/W. Otherwise, additional R/W or a permanently
dedicated drainage easement will be required to accommodate the proposed project drainage
4)All sizes, types, and invert elevations of existing/proposed pipes and drainage structures must be shown(see Sec.3 #1 for survey requirements)
5)Provide spot elevations along frontage of driveway (at EOP and centerline)
6)Provide grades and spot elevations for existing and proposed ditches
7)Show how drainage will be accommodated along property frontage(District Engineer may require applicant to provide drainage calculations when warranted)
C/L
EOTEOP
P/L
R/WR/W
R/W
EOP
EOP
EOP
EOP
NTS
R/W
P/L
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
DRAINAGE FLOW
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
SHOULDER WIDTH
S IGHT T R IANGLE
10 ' BY 70 'S I GHT T R I AN G L E10' B Y 70'
DRIVEWAY
RR MIN. 30'MIN. 30'
NO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH
NORMAL CROWN ROADWAY
6" LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENTMIN 2% FALL AWAY or
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
PIPE/TYPE/SIZE
WIDTH
CON
CR
ET
E
/ASP
HA
LT
LOCAL NAME ROAD POSTED SPEED ( ) MPH WIDTH WIDTHSR NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS:TAX PARCEL #
20191115
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
PARALLEL END S.D. 310.02
INVERT ELEVATION
20' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINEDRIVEWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
OR 500' OF XYZ SURVEY DATA PAST THE PROPERT LINENEAREST OUTFALL ELEVATION
NOTICE REQUIRED
ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OFSAID UTILITIES.
CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED EXCAVATION AT LEASTTWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION.
CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM APPROACH DISTANCE TOENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THELATEST NEW HANOVER COUNTY ORDINANCES AND STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL.
Signature:
Name and Title: James Branch Smith, PE
Date:8/29/24
Registration Number:034354
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE CURRENT DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY ANDTHAT UPON RECEIPT OF "AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT" ANY CLEARING, GRADING,CONSTRUCTION, OR DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THISPLAN AND THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND RULES OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY, THESTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENCIES WHICHARE HEREBY PART OF THIS PLAN. AS THE DEVELOPER, WE ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSEDFACILITIES. WE WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO TRANSFER THIS RESPONSIBILITY WITHOUT THEWRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY.
Signature:
Name and Title: Paul and Deanne Meadows, Property Owner
Date:
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
NORTHCAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
SR
ITH034354
DOGW O O D LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
PRELIM. DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
8/16/24
JBS
COVER
1 5
SHEET:
SURVEYOR
SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN
SHEET DESCRIPTIONINDEX
CX100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
CIVIL SHEET LIST
CS-100
1
2
3
4
PG.
COVER COVER SHEET
5 SITE AND UTILITY DETAILSCD-100
AUGUST 2024
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC
DESIGN DRAWINGS
MEADOWS COMMERCIAL LOT
Know what'sbelow.before you dig.Call
R
COVER
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
L
O
T
Pa
u
l
a
n
d
D
e
a
n
n
e
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
47
1
7
I
n
d
i
a
n
C
o
r
n
T
r
a
i
l
Ca
s
t
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANCG-100
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY
R
D
Septic Field & Repair
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
ExistingShed to beRemoved
Area to beRemoved
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
S R
ITH034354
DOGW O OD LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/29/24
CX100
2 5
EXISTINGCONDITIONS
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
2. This property is not impacted by any AEC.
3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlayresources.
4. This site is not impacted by any recognizedhistoric or archeological significance.
5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site.
6. Existing regulated trees have been field located. No"Specimen" trees were identified. Tree protection
7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands.
8. There is no evidence of endangered species orhabitat issues on the site.
Site Inventory Notes:
9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard
10. The site runoff will flow into the Prince George
1. Soils: Se (Segate fine sand)
and mitigation - if necessary - will be completedduring detailed design & permitting.
Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720322100K,dated August 28, 2018.
Creek watershed.
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY R
D
House BurnedDemolishedand Removed
NA
D
8
3
(
2
0
1
1
)
(N
C
G
R
I
D
)
Cast
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
R
o
a
d
(
U
.
S
.
H
w
y
.
1
1
7
)
Sondey
R
o
a
d
/
S
.
R
.
1
3
3
4
(Var
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
/
W
)
N 66°24'
2
5
"
W
1
4
0
.
0
8
'
S 36°
3
8
'
3
5
"
W
2
4
3
.
3
5
'
N 28°
2
7
'
3
5
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
S 69°58'25
"
E
1
7
6
.
1
2
'
(50' R/
W
)
48'' Water Oak
32'' Live Oak
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
e
30'
50'
30'
New
"
F
l
e
x
"
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
SpaceNew
"
F
l
e
x
"
20' B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
20' Tra
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
30' Side
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
n/f
Ryan P. &Amanda D. Mekler
D.B. 6246-464Zoning: RALand Use: Vacant
n/fEvelyn PotterDavis Heirs
D.B. 6559-2347Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
n/f
RyanGriffin
D.B. 5904-2713Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fRichard &Dara Kern
D.B. 6041-82Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fAliciaVasquez
D.B. 6258-2144
Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
150.
0
4
'
76.8
8
'
20'
B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
25' S
t
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
B
u
f
f
e
r
y
a
r
d
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
25' Street
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
New15' x 30'Tire Shed
W
24'
62'
25'
31'
S 53°
5
6
'
8
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
157.8
3
'
IG
MC
IV
IC
MC
IGSM
IV
IC
SM
SM
SM
IL
MC-P
IV
R2
5
'
R25'
R1
0
'
R10'
18'
9'
48'
IC
34'
R5
'
R5'
2% FROM EOP
2%
F
R
O
M
E
O
P
IG
FFE
=
2
3
.
0
0
21
22
22
21
2
3
22
22
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PR
O
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JA
MEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEAL
AL
S R
ITH034354
DOGW O OD LD,
P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/29/24
CS100
3 5
SITE ANDLANDSCAPEPLAN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
3. Current Zoning District: RA
2. Tract Area: 36,372 s.f.± (0.84 ac.)
1. New Hanover County Parcel No.:
General Notes:
4. Comprehensive Plan Classification:Community Mixed-Use
322112.95.1866
Development Data:
[PID R1700-002-007-000]
Total Building Area - 7,070 s.f.±
New Building Parking - (@ 2.5 spaces / 1000 s.f. GFA)Min. Spaces Req'd. = 8** Spaces Prov'd. = 9 ** (2 garage spaces)
Max. Proposed New Building Height - 1-Story / 25'
Proposed District - (CZD) B-2
2. This property is not impacted by any AEC.
3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlayresources.
4. This site is not impacted by any recognizedhistoric or archeological significance.
5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site.
6. Existing regulated trees have been field located. No"Specimen" trees were identified. Tree protection
7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands.
8. There is no evidence of endangered species orhabitat issues on the site.
Site Inventory Notes:
9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard
10. The site runoff will flow into the Prince George
1. Soils: Se (Segate fine sand)
and mitigation - if necessary - will be completedduring detailed design & permitting.
Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720322100K,dated August 28, 2018.
Creek watershed.
Utility Notes:
1. Water service will be provided by a private, on-site well. Sanitary sewer service is provided by a
gas & telephone shall be installed underground.
3. Solid waste disposal will be by dumpster pickup by
2. All utility services, such as electric power, CATV,
private on-site septic system. No Fire Hydrants
private contractor / hauler.
Proposed New (Lot 2) - +3,000 s.f.±
Ex. Bldg. Addition (Lot 1) - + 450 s.f.±
Existing (Lot 1) - 5,200 s.f.±Ex. Shed to be Removed (Lot 1) - -1,580 s.f.±
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY R
D
Lot 2 Impervious Data:Rooftop - 3000 s.f.Parking Lot - 3600 s.f.Sidewalks - 300 s.f.DOT Driveway 1100 s.f.
Total - 8,000 s.f.
in the area.
Lot 1 Impervious Data:Ex. Rooftop - 4950 s.f.Ex. Concrete-Gravel Yards - 7675 s.f.
Total Existing - 12,625 s.f.Existing Removed - -1500 s.f.
New Building Addition - +450 s.f.
Total Redeveloped - 11,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Treated:Permit Threshold - -10,000 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Total: 19,575 s.f.
19,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Treated:9,575 s.f.
NCDEQ Permit Exclusion:
12,625 s.f.Lot 1 and 2 Existing Total:Lot 1 & 2 Impervious Total: 19,575 s.f.
Lot 1 & 2 Impervious NET: 6,950 s.f.
LANDSCAPE PLANT SCHEDULE:
RIBBON CURB(SEE DETAILS)
ACCESSIBLESPACE, SIGN,AND AISLE(SEE DETAILS)
PROPOSEDSEPTIC AREASPERMIT BYOTHERS
PROPOSED INFILTRATIONAGGREGATE UNDERPERVIOUS PAVEMENT
SIDEWALK, TYP.
PROPOSED WELL BYOTHERS (SEE DETAILS)
6-FT SHADOWBOX FENCE
IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS 100% OPAQUE,PROPOSED PLANTINGS MAY BE OMITTEDTO BE VERIFIED WITH ZONING INSPECTOR
IF EXISTING VEGETATION IS 100% OPAQUE,PROPOSED PLANTINGS MAY BE OMITTEDTO BE VERIFIED WITH ZONING INSPECTOR
10X70 SITE DISTANCETRIANGLES, TYP.
10X70 SITE DISTANCETRIANGLES, TYP.
Cast
l
e
H
a
y
n
e
R
o
a
d
(
U
.
S
.
H
w
y
.
1
1
7
)
Sondey
R
o
a
d
/
S
.
R
.
1
3
3
4
(Va
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
/
W
)
23
23
21
21
N 66°24'
2
5
"
W
1
4
0
.
0
8
'
S 36°3
8
'
3
5
"
W
2
4
3
.
3
5
'
N 28
°
2
7
'
3
5
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
S 69°58'2
5
"
E
1
7
6
.
1
2
'
(50' R/
W
)
22
21
22
23
19
19
20
20
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
e
30'
50'
30'
New
"
F
l
e
x
"
(1,50
0
s
.
f
.
)
Spac
eNew
"
F
l
e
x
"
ExistingGravel Dr.
ExistingGravel
ExistingGarage
ExistingOffice
ExistingShed
20' B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
20' Tra
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
30' Side
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Lot 1
16,551 s.f.±
n/f
Ryan P. &
Amanda D. Mekler
D.B. 6246-464Zoning: RALand Use: Vacant
n/fEvelyn PotterDavis Heirs
D.B. 6559-2347Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
n/f
RyanGriffin
D.B. 5904-2713Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fRichard &
Dara Kern
D.B. 6041-82Zoning: R-20Land Use: Residential
n/fAliciaVasquez
D.B. 6258-2144
Zoning: RALand Use: Residential
150
.
0
4
'
76.8
8
'
20'
B
l
d
g
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
f
f
e
r
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
&
B
u
f
f
e
r
y
a
r
d
25' St
r
e
e
t
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
25' Street
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
Ex.Sign
& Parking
ExistingConcrete
ExistingConcrete
GarageDoor
GarageDoor
New15' x 30'Tire Shed
(EP 23.03)
S 53°
5
6
'
8
"
E
2
2
6
.
9
3
'
157.
8
3
'
Gravel Dr.
EOP
EOPC
C
C
C
C
C
C
(EG 22.93)
NO ROW DITCHGRADE TO DRAIN
EP 22.80
2% FROM EOP
2%
F
R
O
M
E
O
P
EP 22.90
(EP 23.13)
EP 22.50
EP 22.50
EP 22.25
EP 22.25
EP 22.85
EP 22.50
EP 22.50
EP 23.00
EP 23.00
EP 22.25
FFE
=
2
3
.
0
0
EP 23.00
21
22
22
21
2
3
SW 23.00
SW 22.70
SW 22.70
SW 22.90
(EP 23.08)
(EP 23.45)
(EP 22.70)
(EP 23.03)
(EG 22.95)
(GRV 23.04)
(GRV 23.17)
(GRV 22.70)
(EP 23.26)
22
22
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PRO
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JAMEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEALAL
SR
ITH034354
DOGWO O D LD, P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
7/29/24
CG100
4 5
GRADINGANDDRAINAGE PLAN
0 10 20 40 80
S C A L E: 1" = 20'
G R A P H I C S C A L E
20 SCALE
(No Scale)
Vicinity Map
Site
N
E
S
W
NC H
W
Y
1
1
7
-
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
O
A
D
PARM
E
L
E
R
D
SODNEY
R
D
6" PVCDOWNSPOUTCOLLECTION
6" PVCDOWNSPOUTCOLLECTION
6" SLOTTED PVCWITHIN AGGREGATEBASE (SEE DETAILS)
6" HEADER CURBAROUND PERVIOUS(SEE DETAILS)
PG = PROPOSED GRADE (GROUND)(EG) = EXISTING GRADEEP = EDGE OF PAVEMENTEC = EDGE OF CONCRETESW = TOP OF SIDEWALKBC/TC = TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONGRV = GRAVEL PARKING
RIM = CENTER OF GRATECI = CATCH BASINDI = DROP INLETYI = YARD INLETMH = STORM MANHOLECL = CENTERLINEINV = INVERTC/O = TOP OF CLEANOUT(EG) = EXISTING ELEVATIONS, TYP.
SPOT GRADE LEGEND:
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES:
1.)STORMWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE PROPERTY OWNER, INCLUDING PIPES, STRUCTURES, ANDSTORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES AS PERMITTED WITH THESTATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION.
2.) ALL IMPERVIOUS MUST DRAIN TO THE DESIGNED STORMWATERSYSTEM UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
3.) BUILDINGS SHALL DIVERT ROOF DRAINAGE TO STORMWATERCOLLECTION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR, BUILDERS, AND OWNERSARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ROOF DRAINAGE PIPING INADVANCE OR ORDERING FINAL STORM DRAINAGE. REF. CIVIL ORARCHITECT DETAILS FOR TYPICAL DOWNSPOUT DETAILS ANDCONNECTIONS.
4.)REFERENCE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR GRADING, DRAINAGEAND EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED SEPARATELY BUT INCLUDEDHEREIN THESE DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. ANYDISCREPANCIES SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIORTO CHANGING THE WORK. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH PENDER COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF SURFCITY BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
5.) GEOTECHNICAL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED ON-SITE BY ATHIRD-PARTY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IN ORDER TO CONFIRMSUITABILITY OF SOILS AND SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND SET THEMINIMUM COMPACTION VALUES IN FILL AREAS, UTILITY TRENCHES,PAVEMENT, AND BUILDING PADS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIPTOPSOIL AND ANY UNSUITALBE MATERIAL AND PROVIDE CUT/FILLOPERATIONS TO PROVIDE A COMPACTED CONTROLLEDSUBGRADE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER.
12" RIBBON CURB(SEE DETAILS)
SEPTIC EASEMENTFOR LOTS 1 AND 2
PRELIM. DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISION NO.
OF:
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
47
3
7
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
R
D
.
,
C
A
S
T
L
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
THE
S
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
N
D
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
R
E
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
A
N
D
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
U
S
E
D
O
N
A
N
Y
O
T
H
E
R
W
O
R
K
E
X
CEP
T
B
Y
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
W
I
T
H
D
O
G
W
O
O
D
L
D
,
P
L
L
C
.
PRO
V
E
R
B
S
1
6
:
3
C
O
M
M
I
T
Y
O
U
R
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
T
H
E
L
O
R
D
A
N
D
Y
O
U
R
P
L
A
N
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
S
T
A
B
L
I
S
H
E
D
.
ME
A
D
O
W
S
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
PA
U
L
&
D
E
A
N
N
E
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
47
1
7
I
N
D
I
A
N
C
O
R
N
T
R
A
I
L
CA
S
T
E
H
A
Y
N
E
,
N
C
2
8
4
2
9
NORTH CAROLINA
JAMEBANCH SM
PROFESSION
ENGINEERSEALAL
SR
ITH034354
DOGWO O D LD, P
LLC
5872-P .CIL CN
205 Sierra Dr.Wilmington, NC 28409(910) 264-1071
FINAL DESIGN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJ. NO.24106.DLD
JBS
SHEET:
8/30/24
5 5
NTS
NOTE: PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITHGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OTHERWISE SECTION IS TYPICAL FORRESIDENTIAL STREETS IN THE AREA, BUT ANY PAVEMENTFAILURES MUST BE AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE.
GENERAL CIVIL-SITE NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ANY/ALL PERMITSREQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PLANS.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMITSISSUED.
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO ESTABLISH AND CHECK ALLHORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS TO BE USED WITH THEPROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY A PROFESSIONALSURVEYOR TO PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENT STAKEOUT(S).
4. ANYTIME WORK IS PERFORMED OFF-SITE OR WITHIN ANEXISTING EASEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THEHOLDER OF SAID EASEMENT AND TO FOLLOW ANY GUIDELINESOR STANDARDS WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH OR REFERENCEDIN THE RECORDED EASEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOYPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM LOCATION OFEASEMENTS AS NEEDED.
5. CIVIL SITE PLANS DO NOT REPRESENT ACCURACY OR PIPEPENETRATION LOCATIONS OF ALL STRUCTURES. CONTRACTORAND OWNER SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FORALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS.
GENERAL CONTRACT NOTES:
1. REASONABLE CARE HAS BEEN EXERCISED IN SHOWING THE LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES ON THE PLANS. THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES IS NOT KNOWN IN ALL CASES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPLORETHE AREA AHEAD OF DITCHING OPERATIONS BY OBSERVATIONS, ELECTRONICDEVICES, HAND DIGGING AND BY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH THE UTILITYCOMPANIES. IN ORDER TO LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES IN ADVANCE OFTRENCHING OPERATIONS SO AS TO ELIMINATE OR MINIMIZE DAMAGE TOEXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLCOSTS RESULTING FROM ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING UTILITY LINESINCLUDING LOSS OF UTILITY REVENUES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FORTEMPORARY SUPPORT OF EXISTING UTILITIES, SUCH AS POLES, CONDUITS,FIBER OPTIC CABLES, TELEPHONE CABLES, WATER LINES, ETC.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS ANDINTERPRETATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR SAFETY AND HEALTHREGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROMULGATED UNDER THEOCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLAN AND CONSTRUCT WORK SO AS TO CAUSE MINIMUMINCONVENIENCE TO THE OWNER AND THE PUBLIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLPROVIDE, ERECT AND MAINTAIN AT ALL TIMES DURING THE PROGRESS ORTEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF WORK, SUITABLE BARRIERS, FENCES, SIGNS OROTHER ADEQUATE PROTECTION, INCLUDING FLAGMEN AND WATCHMEN ASNECESSARY TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AS WELL AS THOSEENGAGED IN THE CONSTRUCTION WORK. CONSTRUCTION SIGNING SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF "CONSTRUCTION ANDMAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPLEMENT TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORMTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" BY THE USDOT.
4. ANY DISCREPANCY IN THIS PLAN AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BEREPORTED TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. GENERALCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL SETBACKS,EASEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON BEFORE BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION.
5. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING AS IT IS A REPRODUCTION AND SUBJECT TO DISTORTION.
6. IF DEPARTURES FROM THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS ARE DEEMEDNECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR, DETAILS OF SUCH DEPARTURES ANDREASONS THEREOF SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW, NODEPARTURES FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUTTHE PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, ENGINEER AND/OR ARCHITECT COUNTY.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALLUNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE NOTNECESSARILY SHOWN ON PLANS AND WHERE SHOWN ARE ONLYAPPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGETO UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCONTACTING ALL NONSUBSCRIBING UTILITIES. C A L L NC-811.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL INSPECTIONS,CERTIFICATIONS, EQUIPMENT, ETC., THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.
9. THE ENGINEER DISCLAIMS ANY ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS ANDMETHODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT AS SET FORTH IN THESE PLANS.
GENERAL EARTHWORK NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO STRIP TOPSOIL AND ANY UNSUITABLEMATERIAL AND PROVIDE CUT/FILL OPERATIONS TO PROVIDE A COMPACTEDCONTROLLED PAVEMENT SUBGRADE, AND BUILDING PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CIVIL ENGINEER CAN RECOMMEND A TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTIONUPON REQUEST, BUT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PAVEMENT TESTING ANDSECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIELD CONDITIONS ANDGEOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
3. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO ESTABLISH AND CHECK ALL HORIZONTAL ANDVERTICAL CONTROLS TO BE USED WITH THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALLEMPLOY A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENTSTAKEOUT(S).
3. ANYTIME WORK IS PERFORMED OFF-SITE OR WITHIN AN EXISTING EASEMENT,THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE HOLDER OF SAID EASEMENT AND TOFOLLOW ANY GUIDELINES OR STANDARDS WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ORREFERENCED IN THE RECORDED EASEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOYPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO PERFORM LOCATION OF EASEMENTS ASNEEDED.
5. CIVIL SITE PLANS DO NOT REPRESENT ACCURACY OR PIPE PENETRATIONLOCATIONS OF ALL STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL REFER TOARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS.
CD100
CIVIL NOTESAND DETAILS
6" - AGGREGATE BASE COURSECOMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALREPORT
COMPACTED SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
2.0" - SF9.5C SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOTSPECIFICATIONS
NOTES
1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS AISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE.
2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY'S AND ADA STANDARDS AND IF DIFFERENT THAN THIS DETAIL SHALL BE THE DIMENSIONING SHOWN ON THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OWNER STANDARD PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS AND COLORS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE WHITE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE YELLOW PAINT FOR STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS.
8'8'
SIGN
HANDICAP SIGN DETAIL
NOTES:
2.1.POST HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR BACKFILL IN 3-INCH TO 4-INCH LIFTS.METAL POST AND ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL, ASTM A307-90.
5.TOP EDGE TREATMENT FILM SHALL BE 3" WIDE, CLEAR AND TRANSPARENT WITH A
8.
7.
6.
SPACING BETWEEN LINES.
ARROWS SHALL BE 5.625" LONG BY 3.75" HIGH.CORNER RADIUS OF SIGNS SHALL BE 2.5"
SHALL BE 3.75" HEIGHT AND LOWERCASE LETTERS SHALL BE 2.5" HEIGHT WITH 3.75"SIGN LETTERING SHALL BE NPS MODIFIED CLARENDON TYPEFACE. UPPERCASE LETTERSBY 3M COMPANY.REFLECTIVE FACING MATERIAL SHALL BE SCOTCHLITE HIGH INTENSITY, MANUFACTUREDTRANSPARENT FILE #639.SUB-RESISTANT PRESSURE SENSITIVE NON-YELLOWING ADHESIVE, "SKOTCHCAL"
4.
3.
WITH ASTM STD B-209. THICKNESS SHALL BE 0.80 INCHES.SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ALUMINUM, TYPE 6061-T6 AND IN CONFORMANCECOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI.CONCRETE FOR FOOTING SHALL BE PORTLAND CEMENT AND HAVE A MINIMUMTHOROUGHLY HAND TAMP EACH LIFT AND CROWN BACKFILL AT TOP TO SHED WATER.
9.MOUNT ON BUILDING OR METAL POST AS DIRECTED.
NOT TO SCALE
12"
7'
PAVEMENT/GRASS
9"
9"
2"
R7-8D
12"x9"
6"
18"
MUTCD
12"x18"
R7-8
R7-8a9"VAN
ACCESSIBLE
18"
2"
12"x6"
12"
4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.)
8" DIAM.
1'-4
"
10"
1'-1
0
"
8"
1'-2"
14"R
GENERAL NOTES:1. A GROOVE JOINT 1" DEEP WITH 1/8" RADII SHALL BE REQUIRED IN THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT 5' INTERVALS.2. ONE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE REQUIRED AT 45' INTERVALS.3. A 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE THE SIDEWALK ABUTS ANY CURB AND GUTTER AND ANY RIGID STRUCTURES.4. IN SIDEWALKS AND PLAZA AREAS EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED AT NO GREATER THAN 30' INTERVALS.5. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3600 PSI. IN 28 DAYS.
3600 P.S.I.CONCRETE
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO GRASSED AREAS AND PLANTERS
CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL
GROOVE JOINT (5'MAX. O.C.)1/8" RADIUS
1/8"
4"
3600 P.S.I.CONCRETE
GROOVE JOINT(5' MAX. O.C.)1/8" RADIUS
1/8"
3"
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
BOTTOM OF AGGREGATEMIN. 24" SEPARATIONFROM SHWL
NOTES:1. PERVIOUS CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF ACI522.1-13, 'SPECIFICATION FOR PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT,'PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE EXCEPT ASMODIFIED BY THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
2. IN-FIELD INFILTRATION TESTING SHALL CONFIRM LAND MANAGEMENT SOILTESTS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.
3. SHWL (SEASONALLY HIGH WATER TABLE) TO BE DETERMINED BY SOILSCIENTIST.
12"x12" CONCRETE HEADER CURB (3,000 PSI)
4"
1-1
/
2
"
G
A
P
LANDSCAPEISLAND
RIBBON HEADER CURB AND PAVEMENT DETAILS
NOT TO SCALE
6" PERVIOUS CONCRETE
12" WASHED #57 STONE
ASPHALT PVMT.
6"x12" CONCRETE HEADER CURB
NOTE: PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED WITHGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR NCDOT DRIVEWAY INSPECTORS.
8" - AGGREGATE BASE COURSECOMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALREPORT
COMPACTED SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
2.0" - SF9.5C SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOTSPECIFICATIONS
6" PVC PERFORATED DRAIN PIPEWRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE SOCK
PERFORATED PVC PIPE SECTIONNOT TO SCALE
6"
6"
MEMORANDUM
To: New Hanover County Technical Review Committee
Date: 9/19/2024
Subject: 4737 Castle Hayne Road - Dad’s Tire Store & Flex Space
Comments:
• Please note if there is a proposed intended use for the flex space. If there is an intention
for the use to be like the current business on site, a tire shop, please specify. Otherwise
note whether it would be more akin to office space, retail, or warehouse to list a few
examples. Clarifying the intended use of space, if available, will help determine potential
traffic impacts and ensure proper site planning.
NCDOT Projects: N/A
WMPO 2045 Projects: N/A
New Hanover County: N/A
TIA: To run a trip generation, more details on the proposed usage for the flex space needs to be
provided.