HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRC_comment_response_1_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
February 4, 2022
Ron Meredith
Current Planner
New Hanover County Planning
230 Government Center Dr.
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Sunset Towns
TRC Comment Responses
New Hanover County
CSD Project No. 13‐0304
Dear Ron:
We have addressed the TRC comments dated January 14th, 2022. Enclosed please find the following items for the
referenced project:
‐ One (1) emailed pdf copy of the revised Site and Landscape Plans
‐ Flood Plain Fill report
Comments and responses are below. Please let us know if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
Rodney Wright
Rodney Wright
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 2
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
cc: River Road Construction
PLANNING:
Comment: Please label all Special Flood Hazard Area boundaries.
Response: AE 9 line is labeled.
Comment: Please show the location of any signs and note any proposed sign is subject to Section 5.6. of
the UDO.
Response: No signs proposed.
Comment: Please label what datum the elevations are tied to. Elevations must be tied to North American
Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) and horizontal coordinates must be tied to the North
Carolina Grid System.
Response: Note 9. NAVD 88 used.
Comment: Please include the proposed street name.
Response: Road will be Alvernia Drive. Street name added.
Comment: Please label all setbacks, flood lines, and easements.
Response: Labels have been added.
Comment: Site contains AE, CaZ, and VE Special Flood Hazard Areas and all applicable provisions of Article
9 of the UDO will apply in SFHA’s. Applicable standards will need to be met for structures in
each respective flood zone.
Response: Acknowledged, FF will above flood elevations.
Comment: Any proposed fill on site must meet specific requirements of Sections 9.8.2.E or 9.8.6.I
dependent on locations of fill. In general, fill greater than two feet must include an analysis
prepared by a qualified registered design professional demonstrating no harmful diversion of
floodwaters or wave run‐up and wave reflection that would increase damage to adjacent
elevated buildings and structures.
Response: Enclosed report demonstrating fill is insignificant in overall study area.
Comment: CAMA Minor permits will be required for development within the 75’ AEC (Area of
Environmental Concern) taken from NHW. Lot areas within the AEC will be limited to
30%impervious. However, these lots will include a COD (Conservation Overlay District). The
conservation resource in this case is salt marsh, which carries a 75’ setback that is taken from
the edge of resource. Development is very limited within a Conservation Overlay District and
would not include structures.
Response: Contractor has been working with Southern Environmental to obtain any necessary permits.
Comment: Please clearly label the 75’ CAMA AEC as well as the 75’ COD line on the Preliminary Plan.
Response: 75 Ft CAMA AEC and COD are the same line according to Southern Environmental.
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 3
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
Comment: Please verify that e It appears that Donovan Class four soils on site and the Conservation
Resource on the site are Brackish Marsh and Pine Forest.
Response: Do soil line added to sheet 2 of 3. Disturbance of Class Four Do is shown on Sheet 1 of 3.
Comment: The conservation resource map classifies portions of the site as swamp forest wetlands. Please
note the approximate total acreage of the wetlands on the property. When there a total
aggregate area of 5 acres or greater of swamp forest, additional conservations space
requirements apply.
Response: According to environmental consultant, the NHWL is the edge of the Swamp forest.
Comment: There will be a 75’ COD setback taken from edge of resource (salt marsh).
Response: 75 setback is from Normal high water line, and is shown on plan.
Comment: Please apply for a tree removal permit.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: Please be aware that a Tree Removal Permit is required prior to any land disturbance activities.
Please provide the specific species (Loblolly Pine, Long Leaf Pine, etc.) of the trees to be
removed or retained to determine required mitigation.
Response: Site already has an erosion control permit from 2020 and a tree permit was issued then, will
need to modify the permit.
Comment: Please be aware that there are new tree retention requirements with the UDO that have
updated the classifications of regulated trees. Please see Section 5.3.4 for more specifics. In
addition, trees preserved on the site may be credited toward mitigation.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: Significant trees located in the open spaces are required to be indicated on the tree inventory
plan.
Response: Trees are shown on Landscape plan.
Comment: All specimen trees located within proposed lots are required to be illustrated as well. UDO
Section 5.3.5.C The removal of any specimen tree is prohibited on any parcel unless exempt
according to Section 10.3.11, Variance Zoning and Subdivision. If a specimen tree is removed
without a permit, the penalty for this violation shall be twice the mitigation fee
Response: No specimen Trees located onsite.
Comment: Please be sure to include tree protection, UDO Section 5.3.6.
Response: Tree protection detail has been added to landscape plan
Comment: It appears that there are trees preserved on site according to the aerial, UDO section 5.3.8.
Optional Incentives for Retaining Trees.
Response: Saved trees are shown as credit in the Tree mitigation calculations on the Landscape Plan.
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 4
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
Comment: Please change the note in the site data tale from apartments to condos.
Response: Note has been revised.
Comment: Please show the proposed subdivisions lot lines, if applicable. If the townhome units are fee
simple, please indicated this by adding a note to the site data table or and additional sheet that
shows the subdivisions of land.
Response: Reference note 30 on sheet 1 of 3
Comment: Per Section 6.2.2, please label Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer, and Water Main Utility Easements.
Response: Utility easement label has been added on sheet 1 of 3.
Comment: Please label the proposed 10 ft utility easement along the front of the lots.
Response: 10 ft easement will not be along front of the lots.
Comment: Please show the required 20’ periphery setback.
Response: 20 ft line has been added.
Comment: Please note that a CAMA Major Permit will be required for the community boating facility and
kayak launches.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: The community Boating Facility will require a Special Use Permit.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: Boating Facility, Community boating facilities shall comply with the following standards:
i. The rights to use such facility must be conferred by an easement appurtenant to the
residential lot it is intended to serve.
ii. The applicant shall demonstrate that the project will have minimal impacts on water quality,
primary nursery areas, shellfish grounds, and conservation resources.
iii. The number of boat slips may not exceed the number of residential lots or dwelling units
within the associated development.
iv. Commercial activities, including, but not limited to the sale of gasoline, oil, marine supplies
and food stuffs, shall be strictly prohibited.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: Please show the locations of the required kiosks.
Response: Kiosk location added at end of road.
Comment: Please specify the width of the proposed parking spaces.
Response: Parking spaces are 9 ft in width. Note 3 in Parking Notes.
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 5
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
Comment: Please be aware that the Property owners’ associations is responsible for continuing upkeep
and maintenance of all private infrastructure facilities and common areas within the respective
subdivision.
Response: Reference note 20 sheet 1 of 3.
Comment: Is there any intention of installing signage? If so, please show the location and note any
proposed sign is subject to Section 5.6.
Response: No signs being proposed.
Comment: Are any traffic calming devices proposed?
Response: No traffic devices being proposed.
Comment: Please provide all NCDOT approvals upon receipt.
Response: No DOT approval required
Comment: Please provide a title opinion to show legal access.
Response: Owner will submit document.
Comment: Please consider adding curb cuts for ADA accessibility to the island with the shelter and the
sidewalk.
Response: Not sure comment is for this project. No shelter is being proposed.
Comment: Please indicate the location of the trees that were not planted in the parking islands because of
the location of the Sanitary sewer lines.
Response: Note has been removed. All required trees are shown.
Comment: For the pump station, please include a street yard to meet the standards per Section 5.4.6.B of
the UDO.
Response: Pumpstation not located on this property.
Comment: Please show the specific square footages for the foundation’s plantings and the interior parking
landscaping.
Response: Square footages have been added.
Comment: Please specify the density of the project. Please refer to UDO Section 3.1.3.D.2 for density
calculation with class IV soils on site.
Response: Density shown on sheet 2 of 3.
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 6
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
FIRE:
Comment: Sunset Townes ‐ Town Home & Condo Proposal ‐ 1320, 1330 & 1340 Rock Hill Road This project
has been approved by County Fire with 2 requirements 1. The gate at the approach to the
original site needs to have the KNOX Override system install with siren activation. Remove the
bicycle pad lock and add a KNOX Padlock until the electric gate is installed. This is the second
means of egress for River Bluffs and has been approved for this. 2. There is a broken fire
hydrant at the entrance to this project. in the residential project. Between Mr. Yopp and
CFPUA, it needs to be repaired prior to building permits issued. I am not sure who owns the fire
hydrant, but both parties have been made aware of this over a year ago. Raymond Griswold
Deputy Fire Marshal 1‐14‐22
Response: Knox box is being installed and hydrant maintenance has been brought up to the CFPUA.
Comment: A land disturbing and stormwater permit issued by the County will be required. Please submit
for permits as the design is completed.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment: What is the intent of the storm piping in the south? Is it to drain the unpermitted pond? If so,
the contributing drainage area should be included in the calculations showing the post
development flowrates are less than or equal to the pre development flowrates for the 2, 10
and 25 year storm event.
Response: Borrow pit will have a new outlet box installed, the pipe will be the new discharge pipe for
the pit.
Comment: There appears to be offsite stormwater drainage coming from the south along the existing fill
slope for I‐40. If this drainage will be routed through or around the site, a public drainage
easement sized in accordance with NHC Stormwater Manual will be required. Construction of
offsite drainage conveyance measures that will be maintained by the county will need to be
observed during construction by Stormwater Services and a turnover meeting scheduled once
the system is ready to be conveyed to the county.
Response: Acknowledged, proposed grading will be to direct water around site.
Comment: The parking lot perimeter landscaping should not be located on top of storm sewer piping.
Response: Landscaping has been moved.
Comment: What measures for roof drainage is proposed? Please provide details of roof drainage when
submitting for permits.
Response: Buildings are required to have gutters installed to direct water to the drive aisle.
Sunset Towns ‐ TRC Comment Responses | 7
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3805 Cherry Avenue ‐ Wilmington, NC 28403 ‐ 910 791 4441 ‐ www.csd‐engineering.com – License # C‐2710
NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT:
Comment: Regarding Sunset Townes: DCM needs the date that the MHWL was surveyed on the plans with
the signed surveyor’s stamp. If the MHWL is a year old or older we would want to have the line
verified again.
Response: Reference note 1 and 2 in Wetlands / AEC notes on sheet 1 of 3.
USACE:
Comment: Sunset Townes, an older Jurisdictional Determination (JD) has been processed but the Corps
never signed a survey. Not sure whether the line shown is the wetland line or just the mean
high water line? The wetland line originally flagged by Land Management Group should be
visible on the plans
Response: Wetland line and NHWL are concurrent on the Western tract.