HomeMy WebLinkAboutS24-04 & 05 Additional Items Submitted by Parties 9-2-2025
Public Comments
and Items as
Submitted 9-2-2025
The Planning Department staff do not attest to the
truth or accuracy of the following documents.
Each party bears the weight of explaining and
certifying the validity of their own submitted items,
as well as ensuring they are entered into evidence.
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is Laura Lee Handel, and I reside at 8819 Sawmill Creek Lane in New Hanover County. I am
writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market
Street. This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit
(SUP) process and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
• Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and
is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including additional
residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion Shopping
Center. Market Street is already heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both
drivers and pedestrians.
• Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency response times,
putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire and law
enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
• Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area already prone to
flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage infrastructure
will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
• Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have struggled with
frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional units will
further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically vulnerable
residents who rely on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential
medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
• This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the character of
the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing high-density townhomes
in this space will negatively impact property values.
• The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing larger class sizes
and fewer resources for families who already live here.
• Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development will reduce
quality of life for current residents.
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
• The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density,
single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it.
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
• The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
• With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced at
$500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It
does not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the
clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term
sustainability of our neighborhoods. PLEASE!
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Laura Lee Handel
1
Farrell, Robert
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Monday, September 1, 2025 11:20 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #27493 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Erin
Last Name Langston
Address 601 Arjean Drive
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28411
Email Field not completed.
Please select the case
for comment.
BOC Meeting - S24-05 – Bayshore Townhomes Additional
Dwelling Allowance
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment As a resident living in the area this project is proposed it can’t
help but feel like it’s irresponsible of the county to allow it to
continue in its current state. All of our schools zoned in this
area are so grossly over populated that’s unfair to the students
already attending to continue to grant these high density
projects a green light without finding a solution the school
situation. Taking the children’s art rooms and cafeteria spaces
are not solutions either, those are bandaids. Not to mention the
traffic concerns, loss of green space, lack of hospital
2
infrastructure or many other issues that need to be taken into
account before continuing to build these massive projects. This
project was proposed once before and was denied because of
public outcry. Please choose to listen to us, the community. We
know there will be residential buildings on this acreage at some
point but it doesn’t need to be now and it should not be allowed
to be such a high density project.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
To help
protect your
privacy,
Microsoft
Office
prevented automatic
download of
this picture from the Internet.
3
Farrell, Robert
From:Crowell, Kym
Sent:Monday, September 1, 2025 10:30 AM
To:Farrell, Robert; Roth, Rebekah
Subject:Fw: Bayshore Townhomes SUP Hearing
Kym Crowell
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
910-798-7149 (main)
kcrowell@nhcgov.com
Kym Crowell
Clerk To The Board
New Hanover County - County Commissioners
(910) 798-7143 p | (910) 798-7808 f
KCrowell@nhcgov.com
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175
Wilmington, NC 28403
www.NHCgov.com
From: robert keith <rek81755@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 10:11:02 AM
To: County Commissioners <D_CCOM_CountyCommissioners@nhcgov.com>
Subject: Bayshore Townhomes SUP Hearing
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Esteemed Commissioners:
I am writing to ask that you vote to deny the SUP application for the Bayshore Townhome development
scheduled for a public hearing Sept 02.
The Market Street corridor between Ogden and Porter's Neck is already heavily congested and has a
large supply of townhomes and apartments already available. Even with some recent road
improvements, the roads remain well over capacity and the situation for motorists is nothing short of
miserable. The districted schools are at or significantly over-capacity. More impervious surfaces will only
exacerbate the flooding issue in the area. The proposed development will not offer "more affordable"
affordable housing, is incompatible with surrounding single family residential neighborhoods and is not
aligned with the county growth plan.
Finally, each of you know that the majority of our county citizens are fed up with the unchecked growth
and resulting impacts on their daily lives. When will we start making decisions that are based on the well
being and quality of life for existing citizens rather than being focused on making room for those people
who want to move here? SInce this is a quasi-judicial hearing, I am sure the applicant will have spent
You don't often get email from rek81755@gmail.com. Learn why this is important
4
many thousands of dollars on "experts" that will offer data and testimony supporting the approval of this
project but we all know that these so-called facts can be manipulated to fit their narrative.
I am hoping common sense and a responsibility to serve the wishes of your constituents will rule the day
and that you will vote to deny the application for Bayshore Townhomes. I am sure the applicant can
redesign a profitable project that has a reduced density and negative impacts on the local residents and
our county as a whole.
Thank you for your service and consideration of my comments.
Sincerely,
Robert Keith
1633 Country Club Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
5
Farrell, Robert
From:Danny Pearce <dannypearce24@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, September 1, 2025 9:38 AM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Fwd: Bayshore Townhomes Development
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Danny Pearce <dannypearce24@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 1, 2025, 9:29 AM
Subject: Bayshore Townhomes Development
To: <brivenbark@nhcgov.com>, <lpierce@nhcgov.com>, <dscalise@nhcgov.com>,
<rzapple@nhcgov.com>, <nhccommisioners@nhcgov.com>
PLEASE DO NOT APPROVE THE BAYSHORE TOWNHOMES DEVELOPMENT OF 242 TOWNHOMES AND 62
APARTMENT UNITS!! The Military Cut-Off Bypass HAS NOT relieved any of the traffic congestion in this
area on Market Street and this development will only make it worse and more dangerous. If they want to
build single family homes on this property, that's fine. That would be far less density and would fit in
better with the surrounding neighborhoods. If this development was being proposed to be built in your
neighborhood and your back yards, We Don't Think You Would Vote To Approve It. So Please, Don't Put It
In Our Backyards!! PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS CONCERNS AND DO NOT APPROVE THIS
TOWNHOMES AND APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT.... VOTE "NO"
!! Danny and Linda Pearce. 8247 Porters Crossing Way,
Wilmington, NC 284119
6
Farrell, Robert
From:Polly Tait <pollytait@hotmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, August 31, 2025 9:56 AM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Opposed to Bayshore Townhomes!
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Mr. Farrell & Ms. Roth,
My name is Polly Tait and I live at 106 Wayne Dr. and vote in New Hanover County.
I am opposed to the Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street because it is still too high
density for an R-15 zoned neighborhood. Our current roads, schools and storm water management
cannot support this 304 units development. The traffic, school capacity and storm water impact
studies are based on old and flawed data. The special use permit is a blatant try by the developer to
dodge the significant community opposition which shut down their first failed re-rezoning application
last January 2024.
Porters Neck and its residents fully support smart, holistic development that will enhance our area
and help address NHC’s affordable housing needs. The Bayshore Townhome project is not in
alignment with the NHC Commissioners 2024 vision plan or the goals that hopes to achieve.
Have you been to Laney High School in the last few years? Have you seen the number of teenagers
crammed into that space? Take a walk in the hallways during class change, or sit in on a Math or
ELA class. You will be overwhelmed at the sheer number of bodies in this school. The townhome
development will add more strain to an already overwhelmed school system.
I urge the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to DENY this Special Use Permits request.
Sincerely,
Polly Tait
www.familyfloatingtime.blogspot.com
7
Farrell, Robert
From:Jake Greer <jake.greer44@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, August 29, 2025 9:21 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore townhome project opposition
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is Jake Greer, and I reside at 632 Belhaven Dr in New Hanover County. I am
writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at
8138 Market Street. This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval
under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process
and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community
opposition that led to the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The
project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and
neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
• Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was
conducted in 2022 and
is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including
additional
residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion
Shopping
Center. Market Street is already heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen
safety risks for both
drivers and pedestrians.
• Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency
response times,
putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire
and law
enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
• Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area
already prone to
flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage
infrastructure
will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
8
• Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have
struggled with
frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional
units will
further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically
vulnerable
residents who rely on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for
essential
medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
• This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the
character of
the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing high-density
townhomes
in this space will negatively impact property values.
• The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing
larger class sizes
and fewer resources for families who already live here.
• Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development
will reduce
quality of life for current residents.3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development
Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
• The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is
appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for
low-density,
single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for
overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it.
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
• The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but
this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age
restrictions, and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
• With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to
be priced at
$500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not
contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing
strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP
approval. It
9
does not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and
ignores the
clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public
meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety,
and long-term
sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Jake Greer
Sent from my iPhone
11
Farrell, Robert
From:Mark Rushwald <msr@rushwald.com>
Sent:Friday, August 29, 2025 9:38 AM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Homes
** External Email: Do not click links, open aƩachments, or reply unƟl you know it is safe **
Please do NOT approve this the roads cannot handle any more traffic and you will be bringing in more young residence
with children that require schools
The informaƟon contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidenƟal informaƟon. Any disseminaƟon,
distribuƟon, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please noƟfy me
immediately by telephone at 732-505-4422 or reply by e-mail and delete or discard this message. Although this e-mail
and any aƩachments are believed to be free of any virus or any other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility
is accepted by me or The Office of Mark S Rushwald, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. IF YOU ARE A
CLIENT AND HAVE BEEN COPIED WITH THIS INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HIT THE REPLY ALL BUTTON TO RESPOND
12
Farrell, Robert
From:JJ <jjevers2@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, August 29, 2025 4:23 AM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore SUP
** External Email: Do not click links, open aƩachments, or reply unƟl you know it is safe **
Dear Mr Farrell,
As a resident of the Porters Neck community I am submiƫng this email to be read and shared with each of the County
Commissioners.
Commissioners of New Hanover County-
With the proposed permiƫng and development of the TownHome Project at 8100 Market St in Wilmington nothing but
a plethora of issues will be created. Foremost among them is the increase of potenƟal accidents from the addiƟon of
several hundred more vehicles in an already saturated corridor of Wilmington traffic. The Porters Neck intersecƟon is
already a dangerous locale with aggressive drivers trying to cutoff the long lines of Market St traffic merging onto a single
exit lane northbound. With an already large number of reƟrees and construcƟon traffic to add more traffic to this area is
a disaster waiƟng to happen.
Secondly we see in this area an increase in flooding during spring, summer and the fall rainy seasons which would
negaƟvely affect homeowner properƟes and their values as well.
I would respecƞully request that this project not be allowed to conƟnue as both would bring nothing but hardship to the
residents of this part of Wilmington.
Thank you for your consideraƟon.
Sincerely,
Jerry Evers
Sent from my iPhone
13
Farrell, Robert
From:Shawn White <the.akoboe@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 10:01 PM
To:Farrell, Robert; Roth, Rebekah
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Opposition
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC Planning Director,
I am a PN resident and father of 2 kids at Porters Neck Elementary and I am writing to express my strong
opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street. This project does not
meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses
significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
Traffic Congestion & Safety Concerns
Have you sat in the school carline? There is only one entry and one exit on a two-lane highway for the
entire school, forcing both cars and buses to use the same access point. This was poor planning from the
start, and adding 304 new townhomes will push an already overburdened system past its breaking
point.
The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and is now outdated. It does not
account for significant new developments in the area, including additional residential units as well as
commercial growth at the Novant Medical Complex and the Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street
is already heavily congested, and introducing 304 more units will further increase safety risks for drivers,
school traffic, and pedestrians.
Stormwater and Flooding Risks
This area is already prone to flooding, yet the developer has not provided adequate mitigation plans for
the significant increase in stormwater runoff that will result from 304 additional units. Existing drainage
infrastructure is insufficient, and without substantial improvements, nearby homes face higher flood
risks, property damage, and safety hazards.
Power Grid Strain and Outages
Utility providers, including Duke Energy, already struggle to maintain reliable service in this area due to
aging infrastructure and frequent outages. Adding hundreds of new homes will further strain the power
grid, increasing the risk of prolonged outages. This poses a direct safety concern for medically vulnerable
residents who depend on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential
medications.
14
Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density,
single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it.
Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced at
$500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing strategies.
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for a Special Use Permit
(SUP) approval. It fails to align with principles of responsible growth, prioritizes developer profit over
community well-being, and disregards the clear and consistent stance of residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 19th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project in order to protect the integrity, safety, and
long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Shawn White
15
Farrell, Robert
From:Danielle White <ayella2323@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 10:00 PM
To:Farrell, Robert; Roth, Rebekah
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Opposition
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC Planning Director,
I am a PN resident and mother of 2 kids at Porters Neck Elementary and I am writing to express my strong
opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street. This project does not
meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses
significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
Traffic Congestion & Safety Concerns
Have you sat in the school carline? There is only one entry and one exit on a two-lane highway for the
entire school, forcing both cars and buses to use the same access point. This was poor planning from the
start, and adding 304 new townhomes will push an already overburdened system past its breaking
point.
The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and is now outdated. It does not
account for significant new developments in the area, including additional residential units as well as
commercial growth at the Novant Medical Complex and the Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street
is already heavily congested, and introducing 304 more units will further increase safety risks for drivers,
school traffic, and pedestrians.
Stormwater and Flooding Risks
This area is already prone to flooding, yet the developer has not provided adequate mitigation plans for
the significant increase in stormwater runoff that will result from 304 additional units. Existing drainage
infrastructure is insufficient, and without substantial improvements, nearby homes face higher flood
risks, property damage, and safety hazards.
Power Grid Strain and Outages
Utility providers, including Duke Energy, already struggle to maintain reliable service in this area due to
aging infrastructure and frequent outages. Adding hundreds of new homes will further strain the power
grid, increasing the risk of prolonged outages. This poses a direct safety concern for medically vulnerable
residents who depend on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential
medications.
16
Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density,
single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it.
Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced at
$500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing strategies.
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for a Special Use Permit
(SUP) approval. It fails to align with principles of responsible growth, prioritizes developer profit over
community well-being, and disregards the clear and consistent stance of residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 19th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project in order to protect the integrity, safety, and
long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Danielle White
17
Farrell, Robert
From:Kay Sharples <sunshinek84@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 6:14 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Development
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open aƩachments, or reply unƟl you know it is safe **
I oppose the Bayshore Townhomes Development. Why do you think that there is so much flooding in our streets.
Overdevelopment. You keep approving these developments and if you conƟnue, you will be seeing a segment on
flooding in Wilmington on naƟonal news. AddiƟonally, to travel a short distance can take you 1 hour+.
Margaret Sharples
Sent from my iPad
18
Farrell, Robert
From:Liz Oblinger <oblinger726@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 3:27 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Proposal
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Ms. Rebekah Roth, Planning Director for NHC
Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
Dear Mr. Farrell & Ms. Roth,
My name is Liz Oblinger and I live on Marsh Oaks Drive and vote in New Hanover County.
I am opposed to the Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street because it is still too high density for an R-15 zoned neighborhood. Our
current roads, schools and storm water management cannot support this 304 unit development. The traffic, school capacity and s torm water impact
studies are based on old and flawed data. The special use permit is a blatant try by the developer to dodge the significant c ommunity opposition which
shut down their first failed re-rezoning application last January 2024. We can’t continue to approve projects that will bring growth without planning for
the repercussions. You must ask yourself, would this maintain or increase the quality of life that current residents enjoy, or just bring more
residents into an extremely crowded area and fill the pockets of one land developer. The fact that this is even being considered show s how
out of touch our planning board and commissioners are with what is going on in our schools.
Porters Neck and its residents fully support smart, holistic development that will enhance our area and help address NHC’s affordable housing
needs. The Bayshore Townhome project is not in alignment with the NHC Commissioners 2024 vision plan or the goals that hopes to achieve.
I urge the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to DENY this Special Use Permits request.
Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration,
Liz Oblinger
19
Farrell, Robert
From:L. L. MURRAY JR. <ljmurray28411@bellsouth.net>
Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 3:10 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Trying again letter against 8138 market st.
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is Larry Murray, and I reside at 820 Bayshore Drive in New Hanover County. I am writing to express my strong
opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street. This project does not meet the four
criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to the withdrawal of
their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-15 zoned area, and its negative
impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
Traffic Congestion and Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and is
now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including additional residential units
and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street is
already heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both drivers and pedestrians.
Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency response times, putting
residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire and law enforcement services,
which are already stretched thin.
Storm water and Flooding Risks: The project will increase storm water runoff in an area already prone to flooding,
yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage infrastructure will put existing
homes at higher flood risk.
Power Grid Strain and Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have struggled with frequent
power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional units will further strain the power
grid, increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically vulnerable residents who rely on electricity for
oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes an will disrupt the character of the area. R-
15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing high-density townhomes in this space will
negatively impact property values.
The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing larger class sizes and few
resources for families who already live here.
Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the town home development will reduce quality of
life for current residents.
20
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the designated
zoning. The project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density, single-family
homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in areas not designed to
support it.
4. No in Harmony with the comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion#4)
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is misleading.
The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and the developer has
confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units-expected to be priced at $500,000 or
more-are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to affordable housing
solutions and fails to align with the county's long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It does not align with
responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public meeting by the residents of Porters
Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Larry Murray
21
Farrell, Robert
From:Roth, Rebekah
Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2025 4:50 PM
To:Wanda Variot
Cc:Farrell, Robert
Subject:RE: Bayshore townhomes
Ms. Variot,
Thank you for your comments. I’ve included the case planner for this item, Robert Farrell, so he has a copy of
them as well, and we will make sure the Commissioners receive them prior to the hearing next week. If you are
planning on speaking at the meeting and have any questions about how that will work, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Rebekah Roth
Rebekah Roth (she/her/hers)
Planning & Land Use Director
New Hanover County - Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning
(910) 798-7465 p | (910) 798-7838 f
rroth@nhcgov.com
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
www.NHCgov.com
From: Wanda Variot <wanda.b.variot@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:24 PM
To: Roth, Rebekah <rroth@nhcgov.com>
Subject: Fwd: Bayshore townhomes
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Wanda Variot <wanda.b.variot@gmail.com>
Date: August 27, 2025 at 3:20:50 PM EDT
To: rroth@nhchov.com
Subject: Bayshore townhomes
My name is Wanda Variot and I live @307 Hughes Circle in the Porters Pointe neighborhood
with my husband Donald. We are concerned about the impact of traffic to Brays Drive
should even the R 15 single family homes project be approved. The potential for 70
vehicles if not more racing through our neighborhood is not a pleasant thought. A recent
concern is the rezoning request Z25-11 which involves residential properties @7715&7718
Market Street. This proposal would have the potential to impact Porter’s Neck Road as a
22
cut-through to shopping areas and restaurants and it also avoids Highway17 into
Hampstead at high traffic times. Also the Alexander Road proposal would add more traffic
along Market Street with commercial and high density properties.
Our neighborhood already has difficulty making left and right turns onto Porter’s Neck
Rd. This morning@0640 I waited for 18 cars to pass so I could make a right turn to get to
the gym. At most any given time it may take 5-minutes plus to exit the neighborhood.
I know there are other issues involved regarding schools, flooding, storm water runoff, etc
but the safety of our kids and residents is a real concern to us. The issue with the
developers who alluded to promising that the Brays Drive be emergency access was an
empty promise. That is disappointing to say the least.
I can sympathize that your job and that of the commissioners is not an easy one but I do
hope you take these traffic concerns into consideration.
Sent from my iPad
23
Farrell, Robert
From:Simone Grace <soulpoised@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, August 26, 2025 10:39 PM
To:Farrell, Robert; Roth, Rebekah
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Please share with all parties overseeing this hearing. Thank you.
On September 2nd, I urge you to deny the developer's request to build 240+ units on the Parham property
in Porters Neck.
The requested density exceeds existing limits and would not be harmonious with the surrounding
residential property. A comparison of their master plan to the plat of Porter's Pointe (approximately 60
homes) is a strong visual suggesting the high density development is not in character with the
surrounding homes. The impact to traffic, stormwater runoff and other resources would substantially
drain our already strained resources.
Although the developer requests an emergency road connecting to Brays Dr, it is conceivable that the
conservative estimate of 240 cars will require more than one ingress/egress. Pairing the number of cars
along with municipal initiatives for connectivity, it is not far-fetched to foresee the "emergency only"
access eventually becoming a thoroughfare. The number of cars currently using Brays Dr, a public, but
privately maintained road would quadruple! A thoroughfare would change Porter's Pointe from a quaint,
quiet neighborhood to a heavily traveled road, and the already precarious egress on to Porters Neck Rd
an even greater danger.
It has been mentioned the developer can not turn a profit with the currently approved development of 75
units. I don't believe it is the responsibility of Porter's Pointe and the surrounding neighborhoods to
relinquish our tranquility, safety, and potential property values to cater to the profit of another.
Sincerely,
Simone Grace
8259 Brays Dr
24
Farrell, Robert
From:Scott McLendon <csmclendon@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, August 26, 2025 8:54 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Market Street Townhomes
Attachments:MarketStreetTownhomes.pdf
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Please accept the attached letter voicing my strong opposition to the proposed high density townhouse
development on the south side of Market Street in Porters Neck. In short this project maximizes the
developers return at the expense of the community that must endure overcrowded roads, overcrowded
schools, declining water quality, and a diminished quality of life. I fully understand that these decisions
are not made lightly but there are other alternatives to this proposal that would provide a reasonable
return on the developers investment while maintaining the quality of life that we currently enjoy.
Sincerely,
Scott McLendon
910 231 9275
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is Scott McLendon, and I reside at 604 Shoals Drive in New Hanover County. I am writing to
express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street .
This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP)
process and poses significant risks to our community. I have commented on this proposal numerous
times and I am extremely frustrated and angry that the developer is doing an end run to prevent the
members of the community from voicing their concerns. This is unacceptable!
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an
R-15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
• Traffic Congestion & Safety : The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022
and is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including
additional residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion
Shopping Center. Market Street is already heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety
risks for both drivers and pedestrians. In addition, it is ridiculous to think that traffic exiting this
development will be able to make a U-turn at the entrance to Food Lion as this entrance is almost
directly across from the project ’s exit point and thus will lead to more queuing at the light at Porters
Neck Road.
• Emergency Services Strain : Increased population density will lead to longer emergency response
times , putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire and law
enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
• Stormwater & Flooding Risks : The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area already prone to
flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage infrastructure
will put existing homes at higher flood risk .
• Power Grid Strain & Outages : Local utility companies, including Duke Energy , have struggled with
frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional units will
further strain the power grid , increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically vulnerable
residents who rely on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential
medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
• This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the character of
the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use , and allowing high-density townhomes
in this space will negatively impact property values.
• The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing larger class
sizes and fewer resources for families who already live here.
• Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development will reduce
quality of life for current residents.
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
• The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning , which is meant for low-density,
single-family homes . Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it .
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
• The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs , but this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions , and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing .
• With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891 , these units—expected to be priced at
$500,000 or more —are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county ’s long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It
does not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being , and ignores the
clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term
sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Scott McLendon
25
Farrell, Robert
From:Silvia Audi <saaudi500@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, August 25, 2025 6:49 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
August 25, 2025
Dear Mr. Farrell & Ms. Roth,
My name is Silvia Audi and I live at 373 Shackleford Drive and vote in New Hanover County.
I am opposed to the Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street because it is
still too high density for an R-15 zoned neighborhood. Our current roads, schools and
storm water management cannot support this 304
unitsdevelopment. The traffic, school capacity and storm water impact studies are
based on old and flawed data. The special use permit is a blatant try by the developer to
dodge the significant community opposition which shut down their first failed re-
rezoning application last January 2024.
Porters Neck and its residents fully support smart, holistic development that will enhance our
area and help address NHC’s affordable housing needs. The Bayshore Townhome project is
not in alignment with the NHC Commissioners 2024 vision plan or the goals that hopes to
achieve.
I urge the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to DENY this Special Use Permits
request.
Thank you,
Silvia Audi
373 Shackleford Dr.
26
Farrell, Robert
From:Silvia Audi <saaudi500@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, August 22, 2025 11:14 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Project - R-15
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Ms. Rebekah Roth, Planning Director for NHC
Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
[INSERT DATE]
Dear Mr. Farrell & Ms. Roth,
My name is Silvia Audi and I live at 373 Shackleford Drive and vote in New Hanover County.
I am opposed to the Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street because it is
still too high density for an R-15 zoned neighborhood. Our current roads, schools and
storm water management cannot support this 304
unitsdevelopment. The traffic, school capacity and storm water impact studies are
based on old and flawed data. The special use permit is a blatant try by the developer to
dodge the significant community opposition which shut down their first failed re-
rezoning application last January 2024.[INSERT OTHER REASON(S)]
Porters Neck and its residents fully support smart, holistic development that will enhance our
area and help address NHC’s affordable housing needs. The Bayshore Townhome project is
not in alignment with the NHC Commissioners 2024 vision plan or the goals that hopes to
achieve.
I urge the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to DENY this Special Use Permits
request.
Silvia Audi
373
27
Farrell, Robert
From:Silvia Audi <saaudi500@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, August 22, 2025 11:06 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes R-15 Rezoning
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Commissioners:
My name is Silvia Audi and I live
at 373 Shackleford Dr, Wilmington, NC
28411just behind the lovely tree farm
that you want to destroy
This is heartbreaking and my final input
is that I am NOT in support of the
Rezoning of Z23-21. It is going to be
dreadful and unbearable to deal with on
every level; traffic structure,hurricane
and flooding hazard, danger to our
precious children and everyone else. We
already deal with SINKHOLES on BRAYS
DRIVE and we have to absorb the cost
for. In addition Townhomes are not
consistent with the decor of the area.
The school traffic will be a nightmare to
deal with. Why does Wilmington, NC
have to use every nook and cranny of
space to develop more properties.
Building so many townhomes is not
28
consistent with the decor of the area and
will mostly likely lower the value of our
home's. Why not look for a more suitable
investment area with lots of growth
opportunities like restaurant. Why do
you have to cramp and endanger our
roads structure with heavy traffic that
can not handle the immense traffic flow
and flooding. It will be the down fall and
endanagered of our lovely Porters Neck
Community. You will burden us with a
mess. SHAME ON YOU!. I am
heartbroken at your greedy proposal. I
will be praying that you do the
honorable FAIR decision. We are a very
frustrated.
Silvia Audi
Porter’s Point Community
373 Shackleford Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
29
Farrell, Robert
From:Mark Hondros <mahondros@yahoo.com>
Sent:Friday, August 22, 2025 9:53 PM
To:Pierce LeAnn; Rivenbark, Bill; Scalise, Dane; Walker, Stephanie; Zapple, Rob
Cc:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Project
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is Mark Hondros, and I reside at 345 Shackleford Drive in New Hanover County. I am writing to express my
strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street. This project does not meet
the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses significant risks to our
community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to the withdrawal
of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-15 zoned area, and its negative
impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
• Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and is now
outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including additional residential units and
commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street is already heavily
congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both drivers and pedestrians.
• Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency response times, putting
residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire and law enforcement services, which are
already stretched thin.
• Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area already prone to flooding, yet the
developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage infrastructure will put existing homes at higher
flood risk.
• Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have struggled with frequent power
outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional units will further strain the power grid,
increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically vulnerable residents who rely on electricity for oxygen
machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
• This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the character of the area. R-15
zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing high-density townhomes in this space will negatively
impact property values.
• The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing larger class sizes and fewer
resources for families who already live here.
30
• Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development will reduce quality of life for
current residents.
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
• The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the designated zoning.
This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density, single-family homes. Approving this
project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in areas not designed to support it.
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
• The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is misleading. The
townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and the developer has confirmed
that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
• With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced at $500,000 or more—
are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to affordable housing solutions and fails to
align with the county’s long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It does not align
with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public meeting by the residents of
Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term sustainability of our
neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Mark Hondros
31
Farrell, Robert
From:Silvia Audi <silvia.audi23@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, August 21, 2025 8:29 AM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Fwd: Porter’s Point Community Rezoning Z23-21 (Silvia Audi Not In Support)
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Begin forwarded message:
From: Silvia Audi <silvia.audi23@gmail.com>
Date: August 21, 2025 at 7:21:03 AM EDT
To: "Dane To: Scalise" <dscalise@nhcgov.com>, brivenbark@nhcgov.com,
jbarfield@nhcgov.com, Steph.walker@nhcgov.com, rzapple@nhcgov.com
Subject: Porter’s Point Community Rezoning Z23-21 (Silvia Audi Not In Support)
Dear Commissioners:
My name is Silvia Audi and I live at 373 Shackleford Dr, Wilmington, NC
28411 just behind the lovely tree farm that you want to destroy
This is heartbreaking and my final input is that I am NOT in support of the
Rezoning of Z23-21. It is going to be dreadful and unbearable to deal with
on every level; traffic structure,hurricane and flooding hazard, danger to
our precious children and everyone else. We already deal with
SINKHOLES on BRAYS DRIVE and we have to absorb the cost for. In
addition Townhomes are not consistent with the decor of the area. The
school traffic will be a nightmare to deal with. Why does Wilmington, NC
have to use every nook and cranny of space to develop more properties.
Building so many townhomes is not consistent with the decor of the area
and will mostly likely lower the value of our home's. Why not look for a
more suitable investment area with lots of growth opportunities like
restaurant. Why do you have to cramp and endanger our roads structure
with heavy traffic that can not handle the immense traffic flow and
flooding. It will be the down fall and endanagered of our lovely Porters
Neck Community. You will burden us with a mess. SHAME ON YOU!. I
am heartbroken at your greedy proposal. I will be praying that you do the
honorable FAIR decision. We are a very frustrated.
Silvia Audi
Porter’s Point Community
373 Shackleford Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
33
Farrell, Robert
From:Davis Crouch <dacrouch3@outlook.com>
Sent:Sunday, July 6, 2025 10:52 AM
To:Roth, Rebekah; Farrell, Robert
Subject:Say NO to the Bayshore Townhomes Project!
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC Planning Director(s),
My name is Davis Crouch, and I have been a resident in the Oakridge neighborhood in Porters Neck for almost
20 years but have family roots in Wilmington dating back to the 1920’s. As a long-time resident, I have
witnessed the explosive, out of control growth in the northern part of New Hanover County.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market
Street. This type of high density, build-to-rent development is causing dangerous traffic, incredible congestion,
overcrowding for schools, and an unsupportable strain on power/water services. As a result, deteriorating the
quality of life in our community. Examples include:
Reserve at Blake Farm -240 units
Townes at Blake Farm
Banyan Silo Ridge Townhomes and apartments (Sidbury) - 299 units
Comet Scotts Hill apartments - 256 units
Beaumont Oaks in Porters Neck - 209 units
The Reserve at Beaumont Oaks Townhomes - 34 units
Pinnacle Townhomes - 60 units
Mungo Homes' 400 unit Scotts Hill development Indigo at Abbey Preserve currently under construction
(which removed Public access to cherished Abbey nature preserve) is characterized by its high-density
housing, enabled by a residential performance zoning that allows for lot sizes as small as 9,000 square
feet. This reduced lot size, combined with the lack of zoning approval requirements, makes it an
attractive option for high-density developers like Mungo Home
Others in the area and in Hampstead which produces additional traffic to Porters Neck (for Walmart
and other services)
As well, This project does not meet several criteria required for approval under the
Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses significant risks to our community.
Health and Safety Risks
Harm to Adjoining Property Owners
Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance
34
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to the
withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-15 zoned
area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character cannot be
ignored.
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It does
not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the clear stance of
residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the public
meetings by the residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the
integrity, safety, and long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Davis Crouch
35
Farrell, Robert
From:Urquhart, Scott S <Scott.Urquhart@novanthealth.org>
Sent:Monday, April 7, 2025 1:57 PM
To:Roth, Rebekah
Cc:Farrell, Robert
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes Project
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC Planning Director,
My name is Scott Urquhart], and I reside at Bayshore in New Hanover County. I
am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at
8138 Market Street. This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the
Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was
conducted in 2022 and is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new
developments in the area, including additional residential units and commercial expansion
at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street is already
heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both drivers and
pedestrians.
Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency
response times, putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds
strain to local fire and law enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area
already prone to flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation
plans. Poor drainage infrastructure will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have
struggled with frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding
304 additional units will further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that
could endanger medically vulnerable residents who rely on electricity for oxygen
machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
36
This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the
character of the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing
high-density townhomes in this space will negatively impact property values.
The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing
larger class sizes and fewer resources for families who already live here.
Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development
will reduce the quality of life for current residents.
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is
appropriate for the designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning,
which is meant for low-density, single-family homes. Approving this project would set a
dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in areas not designed to support it.
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but
this claim is misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with
no age restrictions, and the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for
affordable housing.
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be
priced at $500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project
does not contribute to affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s
long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It
does not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the
clear stance of residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 19th public
meeting by the residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the
integrity, safety, and long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
HSUrquhart
H.S. Urquhart, MMSc
Radiation Physicist and RSO
Novant Health -New Hanover Regional Medical Center
Radiation Oncology @
*1988 S. 16th St.
Wilmington, NC 910-662-8432, 662-8416 or 8415
*545 Ocean HWY
Supply, NC
37
*Zimmer Cancer Center
2131 S 17th St.
Wilmington , NC
We are here to help you get the care you need. Visit Novant Health for up-to-date information.
Estamos aquí para ayudarle con el cuidado que usted necesita. Visite Novant Health para información actualizada.
This message and any included attachments are from NOVANT HEALTH INC. and are intended only for the addressee(s).
The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information.
Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please
promptly delete this message and notify the sender by email. If you believe that any information contained in this
message is disparaging or harassing or if you find it objectionable please contact Novant Health, Inc. at 1-844-266-8268
or forward the email to reports@novanthealth.org.
38
Farrell, Robert
From:Julie McLendon <julieamclendon@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 8:33 PM
To:nhccommisioners@nhcgov.com
Cc:Roth, Rebekah; Farrell, Robert
Subject:Proposed development at 8138 Market Street
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
My name is Julie McLendon, and I reside at 6-4 Shoals Drive in New Hanover County. As a concerned
Bayshore community resident, I
am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market
Street. This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP)
process and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to the
withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-15 zoned
area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1.
2.
3. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
4.
Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted
in 2022 and is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area,
including additional residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex
and Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street is already heavily congested,
and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both drivers and pedestrians.
Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency
response times, putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to
local fire and law enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area already
prone to flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor
drainage infrastructure will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have
39
struggled with frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304
additional units will further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that could
endanger medically vulnerable residents who rely on electricity for
oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential medications.
2.
3.
4. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
5.
This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt
the character of the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing
high-density townhomes in this space will negatively impact property values.
The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing
larger class sizes and fewer resources for families who already live here.
Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development
will reduce the quality of life for current residents.
3.
4.
5. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
6.
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate
for the designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for
low-density, single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for
overdevelopment in areas not designed to support it.
4.
5.
6. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
7.
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs,
but this claim is misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with
no age restrictions, and the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for
affordable housing.
40
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced
at $500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not
contribute to affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing
strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It does
not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the clear stance of
residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 19th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term
sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Julie McLendon
41
Farrell, Robert
From:Stephanie Finley <sfinley369@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, March 28, 2025 9:38 AM
To:Farrell, Robert; Roth, Rebekah
Subject:Bayshore Townhomes LLC
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear NHC Planning,
My name is Stephanie Finley. I reside at 8208 Lantana Ln, Wilmington, NC 28411. I am writing to express my
strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at
8138 Market Street. This project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the
Special Use Permit (SUP) process and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to the
withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-15 zoned
area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1.
2.
3. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
4.
Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was
conducted in 2022 and is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in
the area, including additional residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical
Complex and Food Lion Shopping Center. Market Street is already heavily
congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both drivers and pedestrians.
Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency
response times, putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to
local fire and law enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area
already prone to flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans.
Poor drainage infrastructure will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have
42
struggled with frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304
additional units will further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that could
endanger medically vulnerable residents who rely on electricity for
oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential medications.
2.
3.
4. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
5.
This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt
the character of the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing
high-density townhomes in this space will negatively impact property values.
The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing
larger class sizes and fewer resources for families who already live here.
Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development
will reduce the quality of life for current residents.
3.
4.
5. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
6.
The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate
for the designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for
low-density, single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for
overdevelopment in areas not designed to support it.
4.
5.
6. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
7.
The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs,
but this claim is misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with
no age restrictions, and the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for
affordable housing.
43
With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced
at $500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not
contribute to affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing
strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It does
not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the clear stance of
residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 19th public
meeting by the residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the
integrity, safety, and long-term sustainability of our neighborhoods.
The part above was a form letter, and I agree with all parts. From a personal level, we live off Porters Neck
road. Development has increased so much in our area that we often have to wait five minutes to make a left
hand turn from our street on to Porters Neck. Our son goes to Laney. It is overcrowded, there isn't enough
parking, carpool is a nightmare, students get hit crossing the street and there are fights all the time because it
is so crowded. They are building several new subdivisions that will feed into Laney. I am not aware of any
plans to build a new high school or address the current situation. It is very unsettling to think of all the
irresponsible development and lack of infrastructure in New Hanover County. We have amazing natural
resources that most counties would be thrilled with, beaches, river, port, airport, trust fund, etc., yet we are
doing a very poor job of managing those resources. There isn't much land left, so it is very important to ensure
that what little is left is responsibly developed.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Finley
44
Farrell, Robert
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2025 11:49 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #22031 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board
or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the
applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be
included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First
Name
Kevin
Last Name Foley
Address 7913 Bonaventure Drive
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28411
Email Field not completed.
Please
select the
case for
comment.
BOC Meeting - S24-05 - Bayshore Townhomes Additional Dwelling Allowance
What is
the nature
of your
comment?
Oppose project
Public
Comment
This is in regards to the Bayshore Townhomes (Performance) as it's listed in
Laserfiche.
https://laserfiche.nhcgov.com/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=5338066&dbid=0&repo=NHC
45
I realize that this is being considered BEFORE the SUP is decided. At first, I saw this
and thought it was a great compromise. Less density fixes their traffic and school
issues. More green space helps with impervious surfaces. However, I quickly noticed
that these fields are labeled TEMPORARY AND NOT FOR PUBLIC USE. It's clear to
me that they are not fields that they are adding for the benefit of residents. This is is
just a delay to the project in order to skirt the process. I believe that they are looking
to get this approved, then a couple years later, request an SUP (or several individual
SUPs) on the remaining fields to bring this up to their current plan. This makes it
harder for the rest of us to fight this.
Because of the SUP process and listening to the planning boards recommendations,
neighbors have raise a ton of money in order to hire a lawyer, traffic experts,
education experts, stormwater experts, appraisers and as many experts we could
afford. However, if we need to go through the same thing in a few years, we simply
will not be able to afford the same experts again. The developer, Roy Carroll, has
billions at his disposal. This simply creates an unfair advantage for someone with
more money to overrule the will of the people.
It doesn't make sense to have two possible plans for one development. We think we
have some pretty good arguments for the Board on April 7th that they'll deny. If that
happens, they will have to wait a year to submit something similar. I think they are
submitting this now, before a potential denial, so that they can keep moving forward
with it despite the denial.
This should be denied for the reasons I stated above, and allow the SUP process to
complete. Any other requests can be made after that has been decided. If they want
to move forward with this, then they should be withdrawing the SUP. I would say you
could continue this until after the SUP hearing, but if that is approved, there is no
need for this. If it's denied, then they will have to wait a year to apply with anything
similar. This just deserves to be rejected unless the SUP is withdrawn.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload the files here. No more
than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc, docx, ppt, pptx, txt, csv,
xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png, mp3, mp4, mov.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
1
Farrell, Robert
From:DaveMary Renquist <dmrenQ55@ec.rr.com>
Sent:Monday, September 1, 2025 12:32 PM
To:Farrell, Robert
Subject:FW: Marsh Oaks-Bayshore Townhomes SUP Hearing
Attachments:Bayshore Townhomes Site Plan (1) (1).pdf; Email_Long EX Final (1).pdf; Email_SHORT EX
(1).pdf
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Mr Farrell
Please Take immediate action to deny the Bayshore Townhomes approval consistent with evidence
noted in PDF's attached
David and Mary Renquist
8026 Marsh Reach Drive,Wilmington, NC
BAYSHORE TOWNHOMES SUP HEARING
9/2 @ 4PM NHC Courthouse
316 Princess St, Wilmington, NC 28401
Ways Porters Neck residents can help:
Attend the hearing on September 2nd at 4 pm at the NHC Courthouse,
located at 316 Princess St, Wilmington, NC 28401
Email and call the county commissioners through Robert Farrell
rfarrell@nhcgov.com (910) 798-7164. (See email examples attached)
Make a Donation to Protect Porters Neck Go Fund Me: PPN Donations
Petition for signatures: Bayshore Townhomes Petition
Bayshore Townhomes Development:
2
242 Townhomes
62 apartment units
1,800 sq ft commercial space
One-way Entry/Exit onto Market St. with access through Porters Pointe, privately
maintained Brays Dr.
Clubhouse/Leasing Office and minimal amenities
Project map attached below
This development would directly affect the following areas:
Traffic Increase on Market St.- Market Street and Porters Neck Road are
already over NCDOT roadway capacity.
Stormwater- Bayshore Townhomes plans for their retention ponds and
existing property pond to overflow into waterways bordering and used by Marsh
Oaks and several other areas (Walmart, Marsh Oaks Village, PrimRose
Academy, Blue Point, and more) This could have negative impacts on property
erosion, contamination, flooding, and environmental consequences for Pages
Creek, and financial impacts for Marsh Oaks and surrounding neighborhood
stormwater management.
Schools- Overdevelopment in Porters Neck has created a crisis in our schools
with Elementary, Middle and High School all already at over capacity and
climbing.
Harmony- Current zoning for the 30 acres bordering Marsh Oaks is zoned R-15
residential. This would allow for 75 single family or townhomes. This
development would place 242 townhomes in the same-sized area. This is in
direct conflict with the NHC 2016 comprehensive plan for this property and
general residential zoned areas.
Quasi-judicial Special Use Permits require the use of legal counsel and expert testimony
at New Hanover County Commissioner Meetings. The Marsh Oaks HOA has offered to
contribute financially. However, this amount will not be enough to cover the total costs of
all expert opinions and legal representation. In efforts to minimize costs to the Marsh
Oaks HOA and its residents, we are asking Porters Neck Residents from surrounding
neighborhoods to contribute to the Protect Porters Neck Go Fund Me and to sign our
Bayshore Townhomes Petition. Every dollar and signature counts!
PLEASE ATTEND THE HEARING
9/2 AT 4 PM at the NHC Courthouse
316 Princess St, Wilmington, NC 28401
3
The Protect Porters Neck team appreciates you all and every contribution!
This development will impact us all.
Courtney Corriher
Marsh Oaks HOA President
To unsubscribe, click here
Powered by CINC Community Association Management Software
Dear NHC County Commissioners,
My name is [INSERT NAME], and I reside at [INSERT ADDRESS] in New Hanover County. I am writing to
express my strong opposition to the proposed Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street. This
project does not meet the four criteria required for approval under the Special Use Permit (SUP) process
and poses significant risks to our community.
The developer is using the SUP process to bypass the overwhelming community opposition that led to
the withdrawal of their rezoning application in January 2024. The project remains far too dense for an R-
15 zoned area, and its negative impact on infrastructure, public services, and neighborhood character
cannot be ignored.
Key Reasons the Project Fails to Meet SUP Criteria
1. Health and Safety Risks (Fails Criterion #1)
• Traffic Congestion & Safety: The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this project was conducted in 2022 and
is now outdated. It fails to account for significant new developments in the area, including additional
residential units and commercial expansion at the Novant Medical Complex and Food Lion Shopping
Center. Market Street is already heavily congested, and adding 304 units will worsen safety risks for both
drivers and pedestrians.
• Emergency Services Strain: Increased population density will lead to longer emergency response times,
putting residents at risk in critical situations. Overcrowding also adds strain to local fire and law
enforcement services, which are already stretched thin.
• Stormwater & Flooding Risks: The project will increase stormwater runoff in an area already prone to
flooding, yet the developer has failed to provide adequate mitigation plans. Poor drainage infrastructure
will put existing homes at higher flood risk.
• Power Grid Strain & Outages: Local utility companies, including Duke Energy, have struggled with
frequent power outages in this area due to outdated infrastructure. Adding 304 additional units will
further strain the power grid, increasing the risk of outages that could endanger medically vulnerable
residents who rely on electricity for oxygen machines, CPAP devices, and refrigeration for essential
medications.
2. Harm to Adjoining Property Owners (Fails Criterion #2)
• This project is incompatible with the surrounding single-family homes and will disrupt the character of
the area. R-15 zoning is intended for low-density residential use, and allowing high-density townhomes
in this space will negatively impact property values.
• The project adds stress to already overcrowded schools in the area, potentially forcing larger class sizes
and fewer resources for families who already live here.
• Noise pollution, traffic congestion, and parking overflow from the townhome development will reduce
quality of life for current residents.
3. Non-Compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (Fails Criterion #3)
• The UDO was designed to guide responsible growth and ensure development is appropriate for the
designated zoning. This project is not in alignment with R-15 zoning, which is meant for low-density,
single-family homes. Approving this project would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment in
areas not designed to support it.
4. Not in Harmony with the Comprehensive Plan (Fails Criterion #4)
• The developer claims this project will address affordable or workforce housing needs, but this claim is
misleading. The townhomes will be three-bedroom, multi-level structures with no age restrictions, and
the developer has confirmed that no units will be designated for affordable housing.
• With the median income in New Hanover County at $54,891, these units—expected to be priced at
$500,000 or more—are not attainable for middle-income families. The project does not contribute to
affordable housing solutions and fails to align with the county’s long-term housing strategies.
Conclusion
This project is not needed, not wanted, and does not meet the required criteria for an SUP approval. It
does not align with responsible growth, prioritizes profit over community well-being, and ignores the
clear stance of local residents.
I urge you to stand with the overwhelming opposition voiced at the January 9th public meeting by the
residents of Porters Neck. Please vote against this project to protect the integrity, safety, and long-term
sustainability of our neighborhoods.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[INSERT NAME]
Ms. Rebekah Roth, Planning Director for NHC
Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
[INSERT DATE]
Dear Mr. Farrell & Ms. Roth,
My name is [INSERT NAME] and I live at [INSERT ADDRESS] and vote in New Hanover County.
I am opposed to the Bayshore Townhomes Project at 8138 Market Street because it is still too high density
for an R-15 zoned neighborhood. Our current roads, schools and storm water management cannot
support this 304 units development. The traffic, school capacity and storm water impact studies are based
on old and flawed data. The special use permit is a blatant try by the developer to dodge the significant
community opposition which shut down their first failed re-rezoning application last January 2024.
[INSERT OTHER REASON(S)]
Porters Neck and its residents fully support smart, holistic development that will enhance our area and
help address NHC’s affordable housing needs. The Bayshore Townhome project is not in alignment with
the NHC Commissioners 2024 vision plan or the goals that hopes to achieve.
I urge the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners to DENY this Special Use Permits request.
Thank you,
[INSERT NAME]
.