Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-2-2025 PB Agenda PacketNEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC 28401 Members of the Board Jeffrey P Petroff, Chair |Donna Girardot, Vice-Chair Paul Boney|Hansen Ma'hews |Jeffrey Stokley Jr. | H. Allen Pope |Colin J. Tarrant Rebekah Roth, Director| Ken Vafier, Planning Manager OCTOBER 2, 2025 6:00 PM Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS The Planning Board may consider substanal changes in these peons as a result of objecons, debate, and discussion at the meeng, including rezoning to other classificaons. 1 Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z25-16) – Request by A;lano Cardenas and Sebas;an Cardenas, applicants, on behalf of Phillip and Prince<a Pierce, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.39 acres located at 2624 Castle Hayne Road from an exis;ng (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business district to a new (CZD) B-1 district for the uses of grocery store and restaurant. This item was connued from the September 4, 2025 regular meeng. 2 Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z25-17)- Request by Mike Brown with Cape Fear Development, applicant, on behalf of OFSC Proper;es, LLC, Ammo Dump / Lake + 9, LLC, and the D. Webster Trask Revocable Trust, property owners, to rezone approximately 95 acres zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial and approximately 13 acres zoned I-1, Light Industrial for a total of 108 acres located in the 3100 to 4200 block of Blue Clay Road to a general use RMF-L, Residen;al Mul;-Family Low Density zoning district and removing the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). Planning Board - October 2, 2025 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/2/2025 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Katherine May, Development Review Planner CONTACT(S): Katherine May; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning and Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z25-16) – Request by A5lano Cardenas and Sebas5an Cardenas, applicants, on behalf of Phillip and Prince;a Pierce, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.39 acres located at 2624 Castle Hayne Road from an exis5ng (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business district to a new (CZD) B-1 district for the uses of grocery store and restaurant. This item was connued from the September 4, 2025 regular meeng. BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to construct one building consis#ng of 5,264 square feet for the use of a small grocery store and sit-down restaurant. The applicant currently operates a small grocery store just south of the property in a commercial development. The intent is to relocate the current grocery opera#ons to this property and expand the business to include a restaurant. The case was con#nued at the September 4, 2025 Planning Board mee#ng due to outstanding comments regarding the concept plan. The con#nuance allowed the applicant #me to update the plan with the necessary changes recommended by staff, WMPO, and NCDOT. The property was rezoned in 2012 as part of a larger request that also included two parcels to the south, later developed as a Family Dollar. The subject parcel was not included in the commercial concept plan at that #me and has remained undeveloped. Because the site was condi#onally zoned without a concept plan, a new rezoning with an associated concept plan is required before the site can be developed. Under current zoning, the site cannot be developed and would generate no traffic. The proposed development is projected to generate 28 AM and 38 PM peak-hour trips. The site is located along a minor arterial highway that is already over capacity, with a single proposed driveway access on Castle Hayne Road. Two other driveways are located within 100 feet for the proposed access due to the narrow width of the parcel. While the project is expected to generate fewer than 100 daily trips, it is an#cipated to have small impact to traffic. The comprehensive plan designates this property as Community Mixed Use which focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development pa<erns that serve all modes of travel and act as an a<ractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recrea#onal, commercial, ins#tu#onal, and mul#-family and single-family residen#al. The proposed (CZD) B-1 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed use is recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning with the updated concept plan. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff’s recommenda#on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera#ons, and technical review. Although the site was previously rezoned to a condi#onal B-1 district, it was never developed because no concept plan was approved. The current request provides a concept plan and introduces two new uses consistent with the Community Mixed Use place type and the nearby Wrightsboro commercial node. In addi#on to carrying forward condi#ons from the prior rezoning, the request includes new condi#ons designed to limit poten#al impacts on the surrounding area. As a result, staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposal. Please refer to the Script for suggested and alterna5ve mo5on language. ATTACHMENTS: Descrip#on Z25-16 - Planning Board Script Z25-16 - Staff Report Z25-16 - Zoning Map Z25-16 - FLUM Map Z25-16 - Mailout Map Z25-16 - Application Cover Sheet Z25-16 - Application Z25-16 - Concept Plan Coversheet Z25-16 - Concept Plan Z25-16 - Public Comments Coversheet COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z25-16) Request by Atilano Cardenas and Sebastian Cardenas, applicants, on behalf of Phillip and Princetta Pierce, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.39 acres located at 2624 Castle Hayne Road from an existing (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business district to a new (CZD) B-1 district for the uses of grocery store and restaurant. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’s and supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s and supporters’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with a motion and vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community Mixed use place type. I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it allows for an additional grocery option for the community and will support a local business. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1 Proposed Conditions: 1. The list of approved uses shall be limited to Grocery, Restaurant, and General Retail. 2. A minimum 5-foot-wide public access easement shall be provided along the frontage parallel to Castle Hayne Road to accommodate future bicycle and pedestrian access. 3. The specimen live oak tree at the northeast corner of the property must be retained and protected during construction in accordance with the UDO standards. 4. The location of the dumpster will be located and screened in accordance with the standards of the UDO. 5. A drive-thru is not allowed. Alternative Motion for Denial: I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community Mixed use place type. I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the use may be too intense for the size of the parcel and the surrounding land uses. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 1 - 2 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 1 of 13 STAFF REPORT FOR Z25-16 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z25-16 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional B-1, Neighborhood Business Applicant: Property Owner(s): Atilano Cardenas & Sebastian Cardenas Philip & Princetta Pierce Location: Acreage: 2624 Castle Hayne Rd 0.39 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R03311-004-017-000 Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped Restaurant, Grocery Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business (CZD) B-1, Neighborhood Business SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Medical Office (CZD) B-1 East Developed Residential SC South Family Dollar, O’Reilly Auto Parts (CZD) B-1 West Advance Auto Parts R-20 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 2 of 13 ZONING HISTORY October 4, 1976 Initially zoned R-20 (Area 10A) December 3, 2012 Rezoned from R-20 to (CZD) B-1 for retail use (Z-923) May 6, 2013 Modification of the setbacks approved for the retail use (Z-923M) March 7, 2019 The applicant withdrew a request for a straight B-1 district following a recommendation of denial from the Planning Board (Z19-04). COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sewer services are available through CFPUA. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Wrightsboro Station Schools Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High Schools Recreation Cape Fear Optimist Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources. Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 3 of 13 APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Applicant’s Concept Plan - Includes Staff Markups Sign Parking Castle Hayne Road Dumpster 5,264 Sq Ft Building for Grocery and Restaurant Uses Specimen Tree Access Parking Loading Area Pedestrian Easement Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 4 of 13 • The property was rezoned in 2012 as part of a larger request that also included two parcels to the south, later developed as a Family Dollar. The subject parcel was not part of the commercial concept plan at that time and has remained undeveloped. Because the site was conditionally zoned without a concept plan, a new rezoning with an associated concept plan is required before the site can be developed. • The applicant proposes a 5,264-square-foot building for a combined grocery store and sit- down restaurant. The project does not include a drive-through. The business currently operates a grocery store in a shopping center south of the site and intends to relocate and expand operations at this location. • This item was originally scheduled for the September 4 Planning Board meeting. Due to concerns with the concept plan raised by staff, the WMPO, and NCDOT, the applicant requested a continuance to the October meeting to allow time for revisions. • Changes include reducing site access from two driveways to one and relocating the driveway access in compliance with NCDOT standards, adding the dumpster location and relocating it to accommodate the required Type A buffer along the rear property boundary, identifying the sign location in the front street yard, and orienting the building to accommodate delivery trucks. The design also avoids impacts to a specimen live oak at the rear of the property. As specimen trees must be permanently preserved, a condition has been included reiterating the importance of the county’s existing tree protection standards during construction. • The concept plan also incorporates the five-foot pedestrian and cycling easement required by the 2012 rezoning, which remains a condition of the current request. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The B-1 district was established to accommodate a range of small-scale, low-intensity, neighborhood-serving commercial development that provide goods and services to residents of adjacent neighborhoods. District regulations are intended to ensure uses, development intensities, and a development form that is consistent with a pedestrian-friendly, walkable, and neighborhood scale. Mixed use development is allowed that is consistent with district character. • While the property is already zoned (CZD) B-1, the site must be rezoned again for any potential development given the lack of site plan for this specific parcel. • The following conditions were approved as part of the previous rezoning: 1. Retail hours limited from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. to mitigate concerns from adjoining residential property owners. 2. Specific land uses permitted limited to General Merchandise Stores and Miscellaneous Retail 3. The inclusion of a small wedge of land zoned AR Airport Residential located in the northeastern corner of the property located at 2620 Castle Hayne Road. 4. Directional lighting installed to reduce light pollution on adjacent properties. 5. The creation of a five (5) foot easement fronting the property for a future sidewalk. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 5 of 13 6. Approval of a septic tank permit thru the County’s Environmental Health Department. 7. The mitigation of trees located on site in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. • Due to the changes in the UDO since the approval of the last rezoning, several of these conditions are no longer necessary or apply. Conditions 2 and 4 no longer apply due to UDO updates. Condition 3 is no longer necessary as it was already rezoned. Condition 6 is no longer necessary as CFPUA sewer and water is available. Hours of operation is not a condition staff can easily enforce and is not recommended to be carried over. • Staff is proposing to carry over the following conditions that are already approved for the site with a few modifications. 1. The list of approved uses shall be limited to Grocery, Restaurant, and General Retail. 2. A minimum 5-foot-wide public access easement shall be provided along the frontage parallel to Castle Hayne Road to accommodate future bicycle and pedestrian access. 3. The live oak tree at the northeast corner of the property must be retained and protected during construction. • In the B-1 district there are no minimum requirements for lot area or lot width. The setbacks for the B-1 district are 25 feet from the front, 0 feet from the sides when abutting commercial property, and 30 feet from the rear when abutting residential property. • The dumpster shall be screened from the view of any public right-of-way or adjacent property by vegetative materials, berms, fencing, walls, and/or any combination thereof to a height of at least eight feet. • Street yard, parking lot landscaping, and foundation plantings will be required as part of the TRC process. In addition, a Type A opaque buffer is required between the site and the residential property to the east. • UDO Definition of Grocery Store: o An establishment that offers a diverse variety of unrelated, non-complementary food and non-food commodities such as beverages, dairy, dry goods, fresh produce, and other perishable items, frozen foods, household products, and paper goods; may include a prescription pharmacy, coffee shop, and/or delicatessen and prepare minor amounts of food on-site for immediate consumption. • UDO Definition of Restaurant: o Establishments where food and beverages are prepared and sold on a retail basis for consumption on or off premises as its principal business. • There are no additional requirements specific to grocery stores or restaurants. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 6 of 13 AREA DEVELOPMENTS Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 7 of 13 TRANSPORTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning Vacant commercially zoned land. PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access Castle Hayne Road Secondary Access N/A EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway Castle Hayne Road Type of Roadway NCDOT minor arterial Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 8 of 13 Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 16,803 Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 19,000 Latest WMPO Point-in-Time Count (DT) 17,234 – Castle Hayne Rd between Swartville Rd and Old Mill Rd Current Level of Congestion Over Capacity NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADAWAY PROJECTS U-5863 – Castle Hayne Road Widening • Widen Castle Hayne Road into multi-lanes from I-140 to Division Drive. • Project is currently unfunded. TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic Generated by Present Designation Traffic Generated by Proposed Designation Potential Impact of Proposed Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 0 28 +28 PM Peak Hour Trips 0 38 +38 Assumptions Proposed Development – 3,264 sq ft grocery store, 2,000 sq ft restaurant Sources Source of Trip Generation: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). SUMMARY The proposed project is located along a minor arterial highway that is currently over capacity. There is one State Transportation Improvement Project in the area to address roadway conditions, however it is currently unfunded. The project proposes one new driveway access onto Castle Hayne Road. Due to the narrow width of the parcel, the new driveway will be less than 100 feet north or south from another existing driveway. While the project is relocating an existing business to another location on Castle Hayne Road, and the estimated trips are below the requirement for a traffic impact analysis, staff anticipates the project would result in some increased traffic in the area. However, the project is near the intersection of Kerr and Castle Hayne and is carrying forward a condition for a future bike and pedestrian easement along the road that could provide some reduction in vehicle trips to the site. NCDOT will also review the project through the driveway permitting process to ensure adequate ingress and egress. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 9 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or a Special Flood Hazard Area. • There are no known conservation resources. • The property is within the Ness Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (Moderate Limitation) soils. However, the project will be connected to CFPUA water and sewer. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS New Hanover County Strategic Plan On July 17, 2023 the Board of Commissioners adopted a new strategic plan for Fiscal Years 2024-2028. This plan focuses on three core areas: workforce and economic development, community safety and well-being, and sustainable land use and environmental stewardship. Strategic Plan Outcomes Relevant to Proposal Analysis Residents feel supported and connected to their community. The proposed (CZD) B-1 rezoning will provide the surrounding community with a locally owned and operated grocery store and restaurant. This meets this strategic goal by supporting the community's residents with a permanent food source option while also allowing a resident to own and operate a business within their community. A business-friendly environment that promotes growth, agility, and collaboration. The applicant currently runs a similar business nearby in a rented space. Their goal is to expand operations by moving to a permanent location in the same community. This meets this strategic goal by promoting the establishment of a local business. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 10 of 13 Representative Developments Representative Development of a Small Grocery Store with a Restaurant: Los Portales – Kerr Ave Representative Development of a Small Grocery Store: La Huerta – Kerr Ave Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 11 of 13 Context and Compatibility • The property is located in a transitioning commercial area along Castle Hayne Road, close to the Wrightsboro commercial node. • The property is surrounded by commercial development on three sides, including the neighboring property to the north which was rezoned to (CZD) B-1 in April of 2025. • There is one proposed access to Castle Hayne Road and driveway permit from NCDOT will be required. • This parcel was part of a larger rezoning in 2012 in which the subject area was rezoned from residential to commercial with the southern parcels developed into a Family Dollar. Though the subject parcel was included in the larger 2012 rezoning, the approved site plan did not include plans for this parcel and as a result this parcel was never developed. • The applicant currently operates a small grocery store, just south of the subject site, at 2528 Castle Hayne Road. If approved, they plan to expand operations to include food service at the new location. • While there is a Food Lion grocery store across the street in a larger commercial development, a small grocery store would provide an additional option for local residents should the project be approved. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 11 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 12 of 13 Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Place Type Description Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential. Analysis The subject property is located just north of a commercial node in the Wrightsboro community area along Castle Hayne Road and is surrounded by commercially zoned property on three sides. The area continues to see an increase in commercial development, including the neighboring property to the north which was rezoned to (CZD) B-1 in April of 2025. The site, which is currently zoned as commercial, is classified as Community Mixed Use in the Comprehensive Plan which encourages a mix of uses including, commercial, civic, and mixed-use development. The proposed (CZD) B-1 rezoning is consistent with the uses and intensity recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use of grocery store and restaurant would support the surrounding community by offering an additional grocery option as well as allowing a local business owner to own and operate their business in a permanent location. Consistency Recommendation The proposed (CZD) B-1 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed use is recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and the site is located near supportive land uses in an increasingly commercial corridor. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 12 Z25-16 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 13 of 13 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. Although the site was previously rezoned to a conditional B-1 district, it was never developed because no concept plan was approved. The current request provides a concept plan and introduces two new uses consistent with the Community Mixed Use place type and the nearby Wrightsboro commercial node. In addition to carrying forward conditions from the prior rezoning, the request includes new conditions designed to limit potential impacts on the surrounding area. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion: I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community Mixed use place type. I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it allows for an additional grocery option for the community and will support a local business. Staff Proposed Conditions: 1. The list of approved uses shall be limited to Grocery, Restaurant, and General Retail. 2. A minimum 5-foot-wide public access easement shall be provided along the frontage parallel to Castle Hayne Road to accommodate future bicycle and pedestrian access. 3. The specimen live oak tree at the northeast corner of the property must be retained and protected during construction in accordance with UDO standards. 4. The location of the dumpster will be located and screened in accordance with the standards of the UDO. 5. The driveway location will be amended based on the feedback from NCDOT during the TRC review process. 6. A drive-thru is not allowed. Alternative Motion for DENIAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds denial appropriate.) I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses recommended in the Community Mixed use place type. I find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the use may be too intense for the size of the parcel and the surrounding land uses. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 2 - 13 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1 Initial Application Documents & Materials Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1 Page 1 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 nhcgov.com/528/Planning-Land-Use CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Public Hearing Procedures (Optional) Pre-Application Conference 1 Community Information Meeting 2 Application Submittal & Acceptance 3 Planning Director Review & Staff Report (TRC Optional) 4 Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification 5 Planning Board Hearing & Recom- mendation 6 Board of Commissioners Hearing & Decision 7 Post-Decision Limitations and Actions 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) Company Company/Owner Name 2 Address Address City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Phone Phone Email Email Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1 Page 2 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District: Maximum Residential Density (if applicable) Maximum Non-Residential Square Footage (if applicable) Please list all of the specific uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2 Page 3 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. Note: It is recommended that traffic generation numbers be reviewed by the WMPO prior to application to ensure that the most appropriate ITE land use code is identified and most recent generation rates have been applied. If numbers are verified, please attach a copy of the verification. If numbers have not been verified and the submitted generation numbers must be adjusted, this may result in the application being ineligible to move forward to the intended Planning Board agenda. ITE Land Use(s): Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips: Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3 Page 4 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at-large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County’s policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4 Page 5 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5 Page 6 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as “N/A”. Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist Applicant Initial  This application form, completed and signed (all property owners must sign signatory page)  Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review  Community Information Meeting Report (complete and signed by agent or all property owners)  Traffic Impact Analysis if applicable (use of attached report document is recommended) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda.  Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning  Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements [Note: If elements beyond the minimum requirements are shown on the concept plan they may be considered conditions of approval if not eligible for approval as minor deviations]: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights-of- way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6 Page 7 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application – Updated 06-2023  Documentation on soil types and infiltration rates if underground stormwater facilities proposed  One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans 7. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and 4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval. Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s) Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. Note: If changes are made to the proposal after the application completeness determination that require additional staff review and vetting, the proposal will be ineligible to move forward to the intended Planning Board agenda. No changes will be accepted by staff after the applications are posted at the time of public notice. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7 Page 1 of 2 Community Information Meeting Report – Approved 06-2022 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 Nhcgov.com/528/Planning-Land-Use COMMUNITY INFORMATION MEETING REPORT This Community Information Meeting Report must be submitted with the application for a conditional rezoning, planned development, or intensive industry special use permit in order for the application to be deemed complete. Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Meeting Date and Time Format (Virtual, In-Person, Hybrid) Location if In-Person or Hybrid Selection Criteria for Location Meeting Summary Issues and Concerns Discussed at Meeting Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 8 Page 2 of 2 Community Information Meeting Report – Approved 06-2022 List of Changes and Modifications Made to the Proposal in Response to Issues and Concerns (if no modifications were made, please explain why) Report Attachments All of the following items must be submitted as part of the required community information meeting report in addition to this form. Checklist Applicant Initial  A list of names and addresses of attendees  A list of the names and addresses of invitees and copies of any returned mailings received to date  A copy of the mailed notice with all attachments  A copy of all materials distributed or presented at the meeting Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I hereby certify that written notice of the community information meeting as described above was mailed and/or personal delivery to property owners withing 500 feet of the subject site as set forth on the attached list, by first class mail on [DATE] _____________________________. A copy of the written notice is also attached. I also herby certify that the meeting summary and list of attendees is accurate and representative of the proceedings at the community information meeting. Signature of Applicant or Applicant’s Agent Print Name Date Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 9 commercial premmise GENERAL plan Arch :ROGER CARDENAS HERNANDEZ Atilano cardenas 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 store & Restaurant el paso 150 ft 106.4 ft120 ft 150.6 ft Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 10 OWN1 Owner_Address Owner_City SOLANA ALAN TRUSTEE 1650 MILITARY CUTOFF RD SUITE 200 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 MORTON STEVEN C PATRICIA J 111 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 JEWELL JOSEPH A DEBORAH A 116 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 JOHNSON RANSOM C JR 115 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 HAGER JOHN A ETAL 112 HORNE PLACE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 SHORT ANDREW D 3321 AMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 HUGHES JOYCE S 5917 MYRTLE GROVE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 INMAN DAN E MARIE P 130 CARL SEITTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILLIAMS SAMANTHA 2701 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PO BOX 5600 BARTLESVILLE, OK 74005 ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INC 5008 AIRPORT RD ROANOKE, VA 24012 NEW HANOVER COUNTY 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DR SUITE 190 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 INMAN DAN E MARIE P 130 CARL SEITTER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 GARCIA GOMEZ RAMON ET UX 5916 SALTEE WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28409 JP PORTER LLC 163 VOYAGER WAY HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443 PRIDGEN MANLEY M II 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 ALHOBISHI CONVENIENCE STORES & RENTALS I PO BOX 807 SAINT PAULS, NC 28384 LA BELLA AIROSA LLC 625 KIMBERLY CT ROCKY POINT, NC 28457 OUTER RIM ENTERPRISES INC 3508 KERR AVE N WILMINGTON, NC 28405 JP PORTER LLC 163 VOYAGER WAY HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443 PRIDGEN MANLEY M II 14 SHERIDAN DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 HUGHES JOYCE S 5917 MYRTLE GROVE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC 233 PATTERSON AVE S SPRINGFIELD, MO 65802 WRIGHTSBORO PLAZA 6725 MONUMENT DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 ASSURED QUALITY HOLDINGS LLC 327 GATEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28412 ZP 387 WRIGHTSBORO PLAZA LLC 6725 MONUMENT DR WILMINGTON, NC 28405 CLARK CALEB A 8 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 TIMMERMAN TANNER J KERRIE B 16 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 MCCANDLESS ELEANOR N 1911 KNOLLWOOD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28403 EIR ASSOCIATES PLLC 4424 MOCKINGBIRD LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 PIERCE PRINCETTA MALAVE PHILLIP M 583 PERU RD SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460 ALLMAN ALLEN P 2630 CASTLE HAYNE RD WILMINGTON, NC 28401 MCDOWELL SHELVIA S 4 LAUREL DR WILMINGTON, NC 28401 WILLIAMS JANET HERRING ETAL 511 ASHLEY PL JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546 B&C WRIGHTSBORO LLC PO BOX 3743 WILMINGTON, NC 28406 1Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 11 8 July 2025 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Atilano Cardenas Re: 2624 Castle Hayne Road I would like to extend my apologies for the additional notice, but we encountered a digital notification issue that may have caused confusion so we are holding a second information session. I will also like to thank those came to the first meeting. This is a notice for a community information meeting for an upcoming request by Atilano Cardenas, applicant, on behalf of Phillip & Princetta Pierce, property owner(s), for a Conditional Rezoning from (CZD) B-1 to (CZD) B-1 for grocery store and restaurant. The subject property is approximately 0.39 ac. and is located at 2624 Castle Hayne Road and is identified as PID R03311-004-017-000. The purpose of the community information meeting is to explain the proposal and answer questions from meeting attendees. The meeting will be held at Tienda Latina El Paso located at 2528 Castle Hayne Rd STE 8 at 10am on July 22nd. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at (910) 212-0666 or elpasoilm@gmail.com with any comments or questions. Thank you, Atilano Cardenas commercial premmise GENERAL plan Arch :ROGER CARDENAS HERNANDEZ Atilano cardenas 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 Commercial Area store & Restaurant el paso Area to be buit 6,374 sf square Parking From S e t b a c k 2 5 ´ Entrace and exit for vehicles Restaurant Streetyard Plantings Gar d e n Ga r d e n i a L a n e Gar d e n CASTLE HAYNE ROAD /N.C. HWY 117 Zon i n g B - 1 Fa m i l y D o l l a r Zon i n g B - 1 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 6.00 ft Thuja Green Giant Arborvitae Natural hedge barrier Schematic Section Street 35´ Drain slope 150 f t 106.4 ft 120 ft 150 . 6 f t Surface CoverageRooftop 6,460 Concrete 4,571Total Total building Area 6,374 s.f.(+-)Max. Building Height Parking (@ 2.5spaces/ 1000 s.f .GFA)Min. Spaces req´d. =20 Space Prov = 20 Development Notes Tract Area 16,553 s.f.(0.39 ac.)Proposed land Use(s)- Grocery Store and Restaurant 1. All development shall be in accordance with 2.Project shall comply with all Federal, State and New the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance Hanover County regulations Development Data General Notes1. New Hanover County Parcel NosPARID : R 03311-004-017-000 2. Trac Area : 16,553 s.f. (0.39 ac.) 3.Current Zoning District :(CZD)B1 Propsed District- (CZD) B1 4. Comprehensive Plan Classification:Community Mixed-Use Entrace and exit for vehicles 11,031 Occupation area 39,03 % Free area 60,97 % Concrete Concrete Concrete Garden 35´ Concept Plan Rea r s e t b a c k 3 0 ´ commercial premmise GENERAL plan Arch :ROGER CARDENAS HERNANDEZ Atilano cardenas 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 2624 Castle H AYNE rd Wilmington nc 28401 store & Restaurant el paso 150 ft 106.4 ft120 ft 150.6 ft Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 12 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 13 NHC GIS Map New Hanover County, NC, NHC GIS zoning AR B-1 B-2 CZD B-1 O&I R-15 R-20 SC parcels roads major roads municipal limits address 6/18/2025, 2:15:09 PM 0 0.04 0.090.02 mi 0 0.07 0.140.04 km 1:2,000 New Hanover County, NC New Hanover County, NC | New Hanover County, NC | NHC GIS | Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 14 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 7 - 15 Concept Plan Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1   20 ' Ar e a 5 , 2 6 4 " 1 0 6 ' , 4 f t 1 2 0 ' f t 150',60 ft 150' ft 5" 24 ' , 8 " Protected tree Pe d e s t r i a n a c c e s s Trash containers Gr o c e r y Re s t a u r a n t 16 ' , 4 " 8',2" si g n 19 ' f t 14' ft 66',57" 19',98" 66 ' , 6 3 " 86',57" 41 ' , 4 9 " 25 ' , 1 0 " En t r a c e a n d e x i t f o r v e h i c l e s CA S T L E H A Y N E R O A D / N . C . H W Y 1 1 7 lo a d i n g a r e a f o r t r u c k d e l i v e r y 8 ft Trash containers Turning radius Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 9 - 1 Public Comments In Support 0 Neutral 0 In Opposition 0 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 1 - 10 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/2/2025 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Zach Dickerson, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Zach Dickerson; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z25-17)- Request by Mike Brown with Cape Fear Development, applicant, on behalf of OFSC Proper<es, LLC, Ammo Dump / Lake + 9, LLC, and the D. Webster Trask Revocable Trust, property owners, to rezone approximately 95 acres zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial and approximately 13 acres zoned I-1, Light Industrial for a total of 108 acres located in the 3100 to 4200 block of Blue Clay Road to a general use RMF-L, Residen<al Mul<-Family Low Density zoning district and removing the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is reques#ng to rezone an approximately 108-acre por#on of a larger 814-acre parcel from I-1, Light Industrial and I-2, Heavy Industrial to the RMF-L, Residen#al Mul#-Family, Low-Density District. This request is for a straight rezoning, so any approval would allow for all uses outlined for the requested district and cannot include condi#ons. Any future development would be subject to the general development standards for the district outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) including ligh#ng and vegeta#ve buffers. The purpose of the I-1 district is to provide land to accommodate light industrial development and associated opera#ons. The I-2 district is intended to provide lands that accommodate a full range of heavy industry uses to support the development and success of industrial and commerce clusters. The Residen#al Mul#-Family, Low Density District (RMF-L) was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate density single-family and low-density mul#-family development of varying types and designs. This property is located in the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). The intent of the SHOD is to protect the natural views along specially designated highways in the County, and it places limita#ons on setbacks and impervious coverage. However, the SHOD standards do not apply to residen#al buildings, and the applicant has requested to remove the SHOD from this site as part of this rezoning. Under the exis#ng zoning, the site would generate an es#mated 627 AM and 551 PM peak hour trips. Because of the variety of types of residen#al uses allowed in the RMF-L district, eventual trips are difficult to es#mate, as there would likely be a mix of single-family and mul#-family uses. Please reference the Traffic Genera#on table in the a@ached staff report for a breakdown of number of trips that are es#mated to be generated by single-family and mul#-family housing. The site is located on a minor arterial road which currently has available capacity to serve addi#onal traffic. While there is not a concept plan for this rezoning request, the RMF-L district allows up to 10 dwelling units per acre across a variety of residen#al use types. Larger developments will likely require a Traffic Impact Analysis. The New Hanover County Blue Clay Industrial Park's TIA requires a number of improvements to this area, including a traffic light at the intersec#on of Blue Clay Road and Juvenile Center Drive. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 Students from the proposed development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools. The project is expected to generate about 204 more students than development under current zoning. There are some environmental considera#ons on this site, including Conserva#on Resources and Advisory Floodplain Areas. Please refer to the staff report for an explana#on of the UDO regula#ons for Conserva#on Resources. While unregulated, staff has prepared a map and explana#on of the Floodplain Advisory Area on the site. The Comprehensive Plan classifies this property as Community Mixed Use. This place type focuses on small-scale, mixed use development pa@erns that serve all modes of travel and act as an a@ractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recrea#onal, commercial, ins#tu#onal, and mul#-family and single-family residen#al. The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the district provides residen#al densi#es that are in line with the recommenda#ons of the Community Mixed Use place type, and the RMF-L district would provide residen#al growth in an area of the County that is a mix of residen#al and industrial uses. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff’s recommenda#on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera#ons, and technical review. While the RMF-L zoning request is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, staff would have preferred a condi#onal rezoning with a concept plan to be@er evaluate development impacts, par#cularly related to traffic, u#li#es, and environmental constraints. However, the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Community Mixed Use, which supports residen#al development that can serve nearby commercial areas and future growth. The site is between Blue Clay Road and I-140 with ins#tu#onal and business park uses to the north and several undeveloped large-scale residen#al projects to the south. Public water is available with sewer service available through a mainline extension and a regional pump sta#on. The property contains swamp forest and pocosin conserva#on resources, much of which overlap with higher flood risk areas iden#fied in the Northeast Watersheds Flood Study por#ons of which are expected to remain undeveloped due to the county’s exis#ng conserva#on resource requirements. As a result, staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposal. Please refer to the Script for suggested an alterna<ve mo<on language. ATTACHMENTS: Descrip#on Z25-17 PB Script Z25-17 Zoning Map Z25-17 Future Land Use Map Z25-17 Mailout Map Z25-17 Initial Application Cover Sheet Z25-17 PB Staff Report Z25-17 Application Z25-17 Public Comments Cover Sheet Z25-17 Public Comments Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 Z25-17 Supplemental Attachment - RMF-L District Cut Sheet COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z25-17) Request by Mike Brown with Cape Fear Development, applicant, on behalf of OFSC Properties, LLC, Ammo Dump / Lake + 9, LLC, and the D. Webster Trask Revocable Trust, property owners, to rezone approximately 95 acres zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial and approximately 13 acres zoned I-1, Light Industrial for a total of 108 acres located in the 3100 to 4200 block of Blue Clay Road to a general use RMF-L, Residential Multi-Family Low Density zoning district and removing the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant’s and supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant’s and supporters’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with a motion and vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the RMF-L zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Community Mixed Use place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the district would act as a new area for a mix of housing types in this area. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 Alternative Motion for Denial I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the RMF-L zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Community Mixed Use place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the immediate surroundings are largely industrial, as is the existing zoning on this parcel, which is less compatible with residential uses nearby. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________ I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1 Initial Application Documents & Materials Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 2 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 3 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 4 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 5 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 6 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 7 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 8 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 9 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 10 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 11 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 12 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 13 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 6 - 14 Public Comments In Support 0 Neutral 0 In Opposition 1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 1 of 18 STAFF REPORT FOR Z25-17 GENERAL USE REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z25-17 Request: Rezoning to an RMF-L (Residential Multi-Family, Low Density) District Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cape Fear Development, c/o Mike Brown OFSC Properties, LLC, Ammo Dump/Lake+9, LLC, Trask Revocable Trust Location: Acreage: 3800-4000 Block of Blue Clay Road 108 acres PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R02600-003-003-000 (a portion of) Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped The property would be allowed to be developed in accordance with the RMF-L district. Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: I-1, Light Industrial & I-2, Heavy Industrial RMF-L, Residential Multi-Family, Low Density SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Blue Clay Business Park I-2 East Steele Electrical Contractors I-1 South Across I-140, undeveloped Blue Clay Farms Residential Planned Development, currently used for agriculture PD West Single Family Residential R-15 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 2 of 18 ZONING HISTORY July 7, 1972 Initially zoned I-2 (Area 8B) June 6, 2005 Eastern portion of the site rezoned to I-1 for compatibility with nearby residential zoning (Z-776) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer CFPUA water is adjacent to this parcel and may serve the site if extended within the parcel. CFPUA sewer is available via a mainline extension with a regional pump station required. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Wrightsboro & Castle Hayne Stations Schools Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools Recreation Blue Clay Bike Park, Northern Regional Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation Conservation resource maps indicate pocosin wetlands and swamp forest exist on the property. Projects containing 5 acres or more of both of these conservation resources are required to comply with additional buffer and conservation standards in Section 5.7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Historic There is a cemetery on the eastern portion of this site which is not included in the rezoning. Archaeological No known archaeological resources Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 2 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 3 of 18 APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL • The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 12 acres of I-1, Light Industrial and 96 acres of I-2, Heavy Industrial for a total of approximately 108-acres to a general use RMF-L, Residential Multi-Family, Low-Density district. The site is a portion of a larger 814-acre parcel. • According to the applicant, the requested RMF-L zoning district is more appropriate for the tract than the current I-1 and I-2 zoning as the Comprehensive Plan calls for a range of housing types in conjunction with the build-out of public utilities to leverage that type of development. • The applicant is also requesting to remove the southern portion of the 108-acre project area along I-140 from the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). • This request is for a straight rezoning, so any approval would allow for all uses outlined for the requested district and cannot include conditions. Any future development would be subject to the general development standards for the district outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), including lighting and vegetative buffers. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The I-2 district in this area was established in 1972. At the time, the purpose of the I-2 district was to provide lands that accommodate a full range of heavy industry uses to support the development and success of industrial and commerce clusters as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. • A portion of this site was rezoned to I-1 in 2005 for compatibility with nearby residential and commercial development along Blue Clay Road at the time. • The purpose of the I-1, Light Industrial District is to provide land to accommodate light industrial development and associated operations, including assembly, fabrication, packaging, and transport, where operations are conducted primarily indoors and where suitable sites are served by rail, a waterway, and/or a highway transportation system as well as readily available utilities. • As currently zoned, the subject site would allow for development and uses that are permitted by-right in the I-1 and I-2 districts. Some examples of typical industrial development include: o Manufacturing o Warehousing o Large Vehicle Service Stations o Equipment Rental and Leasing • The southern portion of this property along the I-140 corridor is in the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD). The purpose of the SHOD is to protect the scenic view and natural features along major roadway corridors. The SHOD includes additional standards for commercial development such as increased setbacks and limitations on building square footage. The SHOD standards do not apply to residential development. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 3 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 4 of 18 • The Residential Multi-Family Low Density (RMF-L) district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate density single family and low-density multi-family development of varying types and designs. • While the full list of uses allowed in the RMF-L district is attached, typical uses allowed by right in the district include: o Dwelling, Single-Family, Detached o Dwelling, Row-Style o Dwelling, Duplex, Triplex, and Quadruplex o Dwelling, Multi-Family o Civic and Institutional Uses, such as schools and religious assemblies • The maximum building height in the RMF-L district is three stories; however, Section 3.1.3.C allows up to four stories with additional setbacks. • Row-Style and Multi-Family developments require additional landscape buffering where they are adjacent to single-family and duplex style developments. • The County’s Conservation Resources map indicates portions of the site are classified as pocosin and swamp forest conservation resources. When certain conservation resources are present on a site, Section 5.7 of the UDO requires that portions of the resource must be dedicated for permanent conservation. While those areas must be conserved, they may count toward the total density of a performance residential development. However, the full extent of the area that may need to be conserved is not known until after a developer has field verified the extent of the resources during the Technical Review Committee (TRC) review. • The UDO contains controls on exterior lighting on the site, and the maximum illumination levels at the common property line with the residential properties that abut the site shall not exceed 0.5-foot candles and 25 feet in height. The UDO specifies that all exterior luminaries for nonresidential adjacent to single-family residential districts shall be full cut-off features that are directed downward. In no case shall lighting be directed at or above a horizontal plane through the lighting fixture. • If approved, the project would be subject to TRC and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 4 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 5 of 18 AREA DEVELOPMENTS Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 5 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 6 of 18 TRANSPORTATION *Future access along Blue Clay Road to be determined during TRC and NCDOT review CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development of this site would allow uses permitted in the I-1 and I-2 districts. PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access This site has direct full access on Blue Clay Road. Because this is a straight rezoning future site access would be reviewed by the County’s TRC and NCDOT. NCDOT will not allow direct access onto I-140 from this site. Access along Blue Clay Road* Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 6 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 7 of 18 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway Blue Clay Road Type of Roadway NCDOT minor arterial Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 10,978.25 Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 7,000 (Year 2023) Latest WMPO Point-in- Time Count (DT) 7032 (8/1/2024) Current Level of Congestion Available Capacity NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADWAY PROJECTS U-4436 - While not yet funded by NCDOT, an interchange at I-140 and Blue Clay Road is still included in the WMPO’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan, making it eligible for future federal funding. TRAFFIC GENERATION Potential Traffic Generation at Current Potential Build-Out1 Potential By-Right Development under Proposed Zoning- Single- Family Homes2 Potential By-Right Development under Proposed Zoning- Multi- Family Housing3 AM Peak Hour Trips 6271 6492 3583 PM Peak Hour Trips 5511 9302 4853 Assumptions 1 Potential Current Zoning Build Out – Approximately 847,000 square feet of General Industrial, the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area within the I-1 and I-2 zoning district. 2 Under the RMF-L District, the maximum allowable density is 10 dwelling units per acre. These numbers are based on 1,080 single-family homes. 3 Under the RMF-L District, the maximum allowable density is 10 dwelling units per acre. These numbers are based on 1,080 multi-family dwelling units. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) Traffic Impact Analyses are not required for straight rezonings as a specific development proposal is required to thoroughly analyze potential trip generation. Per the WMPO, based on the size of the parcel and variety of housing types allowed by-right in the RMF-L district, a TIA will more than likely be required, especially if the site is developed with a combination of multiple land uses. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 7 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 8 of 18 SUMMARY This site is located on a minor arterial road which currently has capacity. Nearby developments such as the Blue Clay Business Park have existing TIAs requiring a range of roadway improvements including a new stoplight at Juvenile Center Drive and Blue Clay Road. Also, while not funded, NCDOT has included an interchange at I-140 and Blue Clay Road in the WMPO’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The RMF- L zoning allows a range of housing types, including single-family, row-style, and multi-family at a maximum of 10 dwelling units per acre. While there is not a concept plan for future development of the site, the estimated traffic generation above is based on a potential maximum unit count based on the RMF-L zoning district. Staff anticipates that if the rezoning is approved, a TIA would be required for future development of the site. The analysis for any future TIA would include the New Hanover County Blue Clay Industrial Park’s TIA and other existing, ongoing development as background for their analysis. ENVIRONMENTAL • The site is not within a Natural Heritage Area. • The property is within the Prince George Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation), Class III (severe limitation) soils, and Class IV (unsuitable) soils. • Because this is a straight rezoning without a concept plan, staff have provided an overview of the approximate location of environmental features that might be present on the site. Field verification of the location and extent of the conservation resources and soil types is not conducted by the developer until a project goes through the Technical Review Committee (TRC) process. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 8 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 9 of 18 Conservation Resources Z25-17 Conservation Resource Map Legend: • The UDO regulates certain Conservation Resources. The purpose of these regulations is to protect important environmental and cultural resources within the County. The map above is an overview of the conservation resources on this site. • The New Hanover County Conservation Resource Map indicated approximately 32.57 acres of swamp forest and 7.92 acres of regulated pocosin resources. • Pocosin Resources are regulated if they are also underlaid with Class IV soils. Soil maps indicate the areas of Class IV soils largely correspond to the areas shown as pocosin resources. • The remainder of the tract is designated as agricultural land and pine plantation which are unregulated. • Section 5.7, Conservation Resources, of the UDO requires that 50% of swamp forest and 50% of regulated pocosin resources must be permanently conserved. The ordinance also requires additional building setbacks from the dedicated conservation areas. Pocosin Swamp Forest Agricultural Land Pine Plantation Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 9 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 10 of 18 • Based on general estimates, staff anticipates approximately 3.96 acres of pocosin and 16.28 acres of swamp forest resources may need to be conserved on site. However, the developer will be responsible for field verifying the location of conservation resources during the site plan or preliminary plat review through the TRC process. • The UDO allows conservation areas to be used when calculating the maximum unit county for performance residential developments. 2025 Northern Watershed Flood Study 2025 New Hanover County Flood Advisory Study Map, depicting Z25-17 Legend: Advisory AE Floodway Advisory AE: 100-year Floodplain Advisory 500-year Floodplain • The subject site is within one of the areas included in the recently released Northeast Watersheds Flood Study. While the findings of this study are not regulatory in nature, and no conditions may be applied to the site through the straight rezoning process, the largest areas of highest risk for flood correspond to the swamp forest and pocosin conservation resources that will require conservation which would help reduce or prevent development in those areas. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 10 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 11 of 18 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENT ZONES Elementary School Castle Hayne Elementary 2024-2025 Capacity 111% Middle School Holly Shelter Middle 2024-2025 Capacity 81% High School Laney High 2024-2025 Capacity 117% STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGRs) Overall SGR (24-25) 0.19 public school students per residential unit Elementary School SGR (24-25) 0.08 public school students per residential unit Middle School SGR (24-25) 0.04 public school students per residential unit High School SGR (24-25) 0.07 public school students per residential unit SGR Trend (20-21 to 24-25) Decrease of 0.05 public school students per residential unit POTENTIAL PROJECT STUDENT IMPACT Intensity of Current Zoning: Typical Development under current zoning would not allow residential development. Proposed Development: Maximum of 1,080 dwelling units in the RMF-L district Students Generated by Current Zoning Students Generated by Proposed Zoning Potential Impact of Proposed Project Elementary School 0 84 +84 Middle School 0 45 +45 High School 0 75 +75 TOTAL 0 204 +204 Sources 2024-2025 NHC Student Yield Analysis Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 11 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 12 of 18 New Hanover County Strategic Plan On July 17, 2023 the Board of Commissioners adopted a new strategic plan for Fiscal Years 2024-2028. This plan focuses on three core areas: workforce and economic development, community safety and well-being, and sustainable land use and environmental stewardship. Strategic Plan Outcomes Relevant to Proposal Analysis Through planned growth and development, residents have access to their basic needs. The strategic objective to achieve this desired outcome includes the provisions of a variety of housing options. The proposed RMF-L district would allow an assortment of housing types by- right and aid in achieving the target of increasing the housing supply to a level of one residential unit per every two residents. Natural areas and critical environmental features are enhanced and protected. If developed, this site could be required to conserve up to approximately 3.96 acres of Pocosin Conservation Resource and 16.28 acres of Swamp Forest Conservation Resource depending on final site design and field verification for future development. There are some floodplain advisory areas present on the site, which are similar to the areas noted as Conservation Resources and which will remain undeveloped as part of the County’s conservation regulations. SUMMARY While the middle school for this area is under capacity, both the elementary and high schools are currently over capacity. The proposed application is not tied to a specific plan of development and does not have an anticipated build-out date. However, given the size of the parcel and potential for up to 1,080 dwelling units, staff anticipates the site would have an impact on area schools. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 12 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 13 of 18 Representative Developments Representative Developments of I-2 & I-2 (Existing Zoning): Light Industrial in Dutch Square Commercial Strip in I-1 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 13 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 14 of 18 Representative Development of RMF-L (Proposed Zoning): Reserve at Beaumont Oaks Apartments (CZD RMF-L) Reserve at Beaumont Oaks Duplexes (CZD RMF-L) Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 14 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 15 of 18 Reserve at Beaumont Oaks Single-Family Homes (CZD RMF-L) Context and Compatibility • The project fronts Blue Clay Road with direct access and is located near large-scale planned residential developments south of I-140, including the 236-unit Proximity at Blue Clay and the Blue Clay Farms Planned Development. • Across Blue Clay Road to the north are the Blue Clay Business Park and Juvenile Detention Center; roadway improvements required for the business park include a traffic signal at Juvenile Center Drive. • The site could gain improved connectivity to I-140 if NCDOT funds and constructs a future interchange. • Public water is available, while sewer access would require a mainline extension and a regional pump station. • Nearby land uses include a small single-family subdivision to the west, an R-15 neighborhood farther east, and the Cape Fear Community College North Campus. • Community services such as medical, retail, and grocery uses are approximately 1.5 miles southeast at the Northchase commercial center. • An adjacent cemetery is not part of this rezoning and will remain undisturbed. • Although zoning in the area has shifted in recent years, the broader character remains primarily low-density residential and light industrial. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 15 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 16 of 18 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Place Type Description Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 16 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 17 of 18 Analysis The Community Mixed Use place type focuses on small-scale, compact development patterns that accommodate multiple modes of travel and provide a mix of uses—including office, retail, recreational, commercial, institutional, and a range of residential housing. The subject site lies along the Blue Clay Road corridor, an area characterized by low-density residential and light industrial uses. Public water is available, though sewer service may require a new regional lift station. Because no concept plan has been submitted, this analysis relies on general information about the maximum potential development and the compatibility of the RMF-L district with surrounding uses. The site also has environmental constraints that will shape future development. Historically used for agriculture, it falls within the study area of the recently released Northeast Watersheds Flood Study. Although the study’s findings are not regulatory and no conditions may be applied to the rezoning, areas of highest flood risk overlap with swamp forest and pocosin conservation resources. These areas will require conservation, which would reduce or prevent development in the potentially environmentally sensitive portions of the property. Designated as Community Mixed Use in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, this area is intended to support moderate-density residential growth alongside nearby commercial services. While the current zoning does not permit residential development, RMF-L would allow up to 10 dwelling units per acre, fitting within the plan’s recommendation of up to 15 units per acre. The district would provide a mix of housing types—such as single-family, row- style, and multi-family—consistent with the intent of the Community Mixed Use place type. Its location near Cape Fear Community College’s north campus and the Northchase business area makes it well-suited to add housing that complements existing commercial and institutional uses while transitioning appropriately between nearby residential and industrial zoning. Consistency Recommendation The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the district provides residential densities that are in line with the recommendations of the Community Mixed Use place type, and the RMF-L district would provide residential growth in an area of the County that is a mix of residential and industrial uses. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 17 Z25-17 Staff Report PB 10.2.2025 Page 18 of 18 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. While the RMF-L zoning request is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, staff would have preferred a conditional rezoning with a concept plan to better evaluate development impacts, particularly related to traffic, utilities, and environmental constraints. However, the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Community Mixed Use, which supports residential development that can serve nearby commercial areas and future growth. The site is between Blue Clay Road and I-140 with institutional and business park uses to the north and several undeveloped large-scale residential projects to the south. Public water is available with sewer service available through a mainline extension and a regional pump station. The property contains swamp forest and pocosin conservation resources, much of which overlap with higher flood risk areas identified in the Northeast Watersheds Flood Study portions of which are expected to remain undeveloped due to the county’s existing conservation resource requirements. As a result, Staff recommends approval of the proposal and suggests the following motion: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the RMF-L zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Community Mixed Use place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the district would act as a new area for a mix of housing types in this area. Alternative Motion for DENIAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the RMF- L zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Community Mixed Use place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the immediate surroundings are largely industrial, as is the existing zoning on this parcel, which is less compatible with residential uses nearby. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 8 - 18 1 Dickerson, Zachary From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Sunday, September 21, 2025 9:41 AM To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson, Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe Subject:Online Form Submission #27830 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name Amy Last Name Barnett Address 213 Island Creek Dr City Wilmington State NC Zip Code 28411 Email ascjam1962@gmail.com Please select the case for comment. PB Meeting - Z25-17 – Blue Clay Straight Rezoning What is the nature of your comment? Oppose project Public Comment Just stop this insane building at our expense and to deepen your pockets. This is insane you don’t care about anything else except more building upon building. Take your blinders off and look at this congested mess you created ! People can’t get to work on time, taxes are always going up, to make YOUR budgets. It’s clear to me it doesn’t affect you $$$$. What about the affordable housing and mental health, for our homeless or ones down on their luck, there is NO such thing. You don’t really care or else we would have a place for these people . I Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1 2 thank God for these churches, non profits and other caring entities that pick up your slack. Again take your blinders off and take a drone eye look at the chaos, the ugliness. Projects like uncovering the old cobblestone roads, that’s nice but why now, when there are more severe pressing problems you could fix . Upload supporting files If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc, docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif. File 1 Field not completed. File 2 Field not completed. File 3 Field not completed. File 4 Field not completed. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 9 - 2 RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY LOW DENSITY (RMF-L) DISTRICT PURPOSE The purpose of the Residential-Multi-Family Low Density (RMF-L) District is provide lands that accommodate moderate density single family and low density multi- family development of varying types and designs. The intent is that the RMF-L district will provide options for alternative housing types near or in direct relationship to single-family detached development. CONCEPT DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS SUPERSEDING DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS Additional Standards for Taller Structures Option 1: Structure Setback Zoning District Adjacent Residential Use or Subdivision in General Residential District* Abutting Multi-Family Dwelling or Undeveloped in General Residential District RMF-L 4 story structures: 100 ft. • 4 story structures: 75 ft. Option 2: Architectural Stepback Zoning District Abutting Residential Use or Subdivision in General Residential District* Abutting Multi-Family Dwelling or Undeveloped in General Residential District RMF-L Portions of structures with 4 stories: 100 ft. Portions of structures with 4 stories: 75 ft. Option 3: Mitigation Outlined in Conditional Zoning District Approval Conditional zoning district outlines technique(s) to mitigate impacts of taller buildings (i.e., site design, architectural design) Standard Single Family Detached Duplex Triplex Quadraplex Multi-Family Lot area, minimum (sq ft)* 5,000 7,500 12,500 17,500 20,000 1 Lot width, minimum (feet)* 50 100 2 Front setback (feet)* 20 35 3 Side setback, street (feet)* 10 30 4 Side setback, interior (feet)* 5 1 to 2 stories: 20 3 stories: 25 5 Rear setback (feet)* 15 1 to 2 stories: 25 3 stories: 30 Density, maximum (dwelling units/acre) 10 Building height, maximum 3 stories Additional height allowance 4 stories See Section 3.1.3.C for standards when adjacent to residential properties * Does not apply to Performance Residential Developments (see Section 3.1.3.D). 1 1 2 2 1 4 4 3 5 5 Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 10 - 1 PRINCIPAL USES KEY: * = USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS APPLY (SEE SECTION 4.3 FOR USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS) By Right Agricultural Uses - Agricultural and Forestry Uses, General Residential Uses - Dwelling, Dual-Unit Attached - Dwelling, Multi-Family * - Dwelling, Quadraplex - Dwelling, Single-Family Detached - Dwelling, Triplex - Dwelling, Row-Style - Dwelling, Two-Family (Duplex) - Senior Living: Independent Living Retirement Community - Family Care Home * - Group Home * Civic and Institutional - Family Child Care Home * - Library - Religious Assembly * - Amateur Radio Antennas (up to 90 ft.) * - Antenna & Towers less than 70 ft. in Height & Ancillary to the Principal Use* - Collocation, Wireless * - Non-Substantial Modification * - Emergency Services Facility - Government Offices and Buildings - Hospice - Boating Facility, Private Residential* - Community Garden - Golf Course - Park and Recreation Area - Utility Lines, Structures, and/or Facilities; General * Special Use Residential Uses - Fraternity/Sorority Residence - Senior Living: Assisted Living Facility * - Senior Living: Continuing Care Retirement Community * Civic and Institutional - Adult Day Care * - Child Care Center - Community Center - Other Wireless Communication Facilities including Wireless Support Structures & Substantial Modifications * - Elementary and Secondary Schools - Nursing and Rehabilitation Center * - Boating Facility, Community * - Cemetery * - Marina, Commercial * - Electric Substation * Commercial Uses - Indoor Recreation Establishment * - Outdoor Recreation Establishment * Industrial Uses - Commercial Recycling Facility, Small Collection SPECIFIED ACCESSORY AND TEMPORARY USES (SEE SECTIONS 4.4.4 & 4.5.4 FOR USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS) Accessory Uses - Accessory Dwelling Unit - Accessory Structure - Accessory Use, Customary - Electric Vehicle Charging Station - Home Occupation - Residential Private Pier - Solar Energy Collection Facility, Accessory - Small Watercraft Storage - Stormwater Facilities on Contiguous Properties - Wind Energy Collection Facility, Accessory Temporary Uses - Construction Office - Debris Site - Farmers’ Market - Special Fundraising for Non-profit Organizations - Temporary Emergency Services Structure - Temporary Family Healthcare Structure - Temporary Real Estate Office/Model - Temporary Relocation Housing Planning Board - October 2, 2025 ITEM: 2 - 10 - 2