HomeMy WebLinkAbout1-8-2026 PB Agenda PacketNEW HANOVER COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA
Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse
24 North Third Street, Room 301 Wilmington, NC 28401
Members of the Board
Jeffrey P Petroff, Chair |Donna Girardot, Vice-Chair
Paul Boney|Hansen Ma'hews |Jeffrey Stokley Jr. | H. Allen Pope |Colin J. Tarrant
Rebekah Roth, Director| Ken Vafier, Planning Manager
JANUARY 8, 2026 5:00 PM
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of Minutes
REGULAR ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The Planning Board may consider substanal changes in these peons as a result of objecons, debate,
and discussion at the meeng, including rezoning to other classificaons.
1 Preliminary Forum
Special Use Permit – (S25-07 – Tideline Boats) – Special Use Permit request by Greg Taylor with
TMC Taylor Construc:on, INC, on behalf of 2nd Wilmington Proper:es LLC, property owner, for
the use of Ship and Boat Building in a (CZD) I-1, Condi:onal Light Industrial district on
approximately 1.58 acres located at 2020 Capital Drive.
2 Public Hearing
Rezoning Request – (Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design
Solu:ons, applicant, on behalf of Leo Nguyen, property owners, to rezone approximately 1.16
acres located at 7244 Carolina Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15, Residen:al
to a (CZD) R-5, Residen:al Moderate-High Density district for a maximum of 9 aCached dwelling
units in the form of duplex, triplex and quadraplex units.
3 Public Hearing
Comprehensive Plan Update - Request by New Hanover County to adopt the NHC Desnaon
2050 Comprehensive Plan update.
4 Public Hearing
Text Amendment Request (TA25-05) - Request by New Hanover County to amend the Unified
Development Ordinance Ar:cles 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 to update references to the Comprehensive
Plan place types, designate the Riverfront Mixed Use zoning district as a legacy district, modify
transporta:on-related applica:on requirements for PD rezonings, incorporate recent changes to
state statutes, and correct an unintended conflict included in the recent sign standards ordinance
amendment.
OTHER ITEMS
1 Presenta:on of Amendments to the Planning Board Rules and Procedures
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/8/2026
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ryan Beil, Development Review Planner
CONTACT(S): Ryan Beil; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land
Use Director
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Forum
Special Use Permit – (S25-07 – Tideline Boats) – Special Use Permit request by Greg Taylor with TMC Taylor
Construc:on, INC, on behalf of 2nd Wilmington Proper:es LLC, property owner, for the use of Ship and Boat
Building in a (CZD) I-1, Condi:onal Light Industrial district on approximately 1.58 acres located at 2020 Capital
Drive.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant has submi#ed a special use permit applica$on for the use of Ship and Boat Building (NAICS code 3366).
The applica$on proposes using an exis$ng two-story industrial facility in the Murrayville Sta$on Business Park. No
changes are proposed to the exis$ng site.
The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) allows Ship and Boat Building in the I-1 zoning district with a special use
permit. While industrial in nature, the proposed use is not classified as an Intensive Industry in the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), and no community mee$ng was required for this applica$on.
The business park is located between the airport and N. Kerr Avenue to the west and the College Road corridor to the
west. The site has two full access driveways onto Capital Drive. While the project is an$cipated to generate addi$onal
traffic compared to the vacant condi$on of the building, the overall Murrayville Business Park was designed to
accommodate a variety of industrial and manufacturing uses. The site does not meet the threshold to trigger a TIA, but
a driveway permit will need to be reviewed by NCDOT.
The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies this property as Employment Center. The Employment Center place type
serves as an employment and produc$on hub where office and light industrial uses predominate. It can also include
residen$al, civic, and recrea$onal uses, but should be clearly delineated from rural and conserva$on areas.
Commercial uses designed to serve the needs of the employment center are appropriate.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Planning staff and the Planning Board do not make recommenda$ons on special use permit requests. As this is a
preliminary forum the Planning Board is required to hear the presenta$on from staff, the applicant, and the public to
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1
facilitate an open and transparent discussion of the special use permit applica$on. Ques$ons and comments related to
the following topics are encouraged.
- Components of the proposal that are not clear or where addi$onal informa$on is needed in order to understand the
project.
- Advice to the applicant on the presenta$on they will be making to the Board of Commissioners.
- Advice to the par$es speaking in opposi$on on what they may want to consider when preparing for the Board of
Commissioners mee$ng, and
- Advice to both par$es on poten$al issues that should be addressed before the public hearing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip$on
S25-07 PB Script
S25-07 Staff Summary
S25-07 Zoning Map
S25-07 Future Land Use Map
S25-07 Mailout Map
S25-07 Application Cover Sheet
S25-07 Application
S25-07 Concept Plan Cover Sheet
S25-07 Concept Plan
S25-07 Public Comments
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1
SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application PRELIMINARY
FORUM (S25-07)
Special Use Permit – (S25-07 – Tideline Boats) – Special Use Permit request by Greg Taylor with TMC
Taylor Construction, INC, on behalf of 2nd Wilmington Properties LLC, property owner, for the use of
Ship and Boat Building in a (CZD) I-1, Conditional Light Industrial district on approximately 1.58 acres
located at 2020 Capital Drive.
1. This is a Preliminary Forum. The purpose of this forum is to facilitate an open and transparent
discussion of the special use permit application and to provide an opportunity for public comments
and questions. Please note per state law, the Planning Board will not be making a decision or
recommendation this evening. Instead, the decision on the application will be made during the Board
of Commissioners’ quasi-judicial hearing, where public participation will be limited to parties with
standing and witnesses providing evidence through sworn testimony. Anyone interested in speaking
in support or opposition of the project should sign in and speak tonight at this meeting, regardless of
standing in the matter.
2. Staff will introduce the application. Then the applicant will be allowed 15 minutes for their
presentation. Following the applicant’s presentation, we will have 20 minutes for public questions and
comments, and then allow the applicant time to address them. The Board members will then provide
their comments and ask questions of the applicant. At the end, Staff will give an overview of next steps
in the special use permit process. We will then close the forum.
3. Conduct forum as follows:
a. Staff introduction
b. Applicant’ s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Public comments and questions (up to 20 minutes – total supporters and opponents)
d. Applicant response to public comments and questions.
e. Planning Board questions and comments regarding the following items:
i. Components of the proposal that are not clear or where additional information is
needed in order to understand the project,
ii. Advice to the applicant on the presentation they will be making at the Board of
Commissioners meeting,
iii. Advice to parties speaking in opposition on what they may want to consider when
preparing for the Board of Commissioners meeting, and
iv. Advice for both parties on potential issues that should be addressed prior to the public
hearing.
f. Staff overview of next steps and the procedures for the Board of Commissioners meeting.
4. Close the Preliminary Forum.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 1 - 1
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 1 of 10
STAFF SUMMARY FOR S25-07
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: S25-07
Requests:
I-1 zoning district requires Special Use Permit for Ship and Boat Building
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Greg Taylor with TMC Taylor Construction Inc. 2nd Wilmington Properties LLC
Location: Acreage:
2020 Capital Drive 1.58
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R03400-003-025-000 Employment Center
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Uses:
Vacant land/Undeveloped Boat and Ship Manufacturing
Current Zoning:
CZD I-1, Light Industrial
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North SGS Laboratory and Business Facility (CZD) I-1
East Murrayville Station Business Park Stormwater Pond (CZD) B-1
South Vacant Industrial Building (CZD) I-1
West Industrial Marine Machining & Welding (CZD) I-1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 1
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 2 of 10
ZONING HISTORY
July 7, 1972 Originally zoned AR and R-15 as part of (Area 8B)
February 6, 1995 Rezoned to (CZD) I-1 (Z-518)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer Property is on public water and sewer through CFPUA.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire
District, Station 17 Murrayville.
Recreation Smith Creek Preserve and Smith Creek Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation
The New Hanover County Conservation Resource map indicates there are no
Conservation Resources located on the property, it is all classified as
Successional Land.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 2
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 3 of 10
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED PLANS
Site Plan with Staff Markup
• The applicant proposes using an existing two-story industrial facility in the Murrayville Station
Business Park for the use of Ship and Boat Building. The North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS code 3366) describes the use as those primarily engaged in
operating shipyards or boat yards (i.e., ship or boat manufacturing facilities). Shipyards are
fixed facilities with drydocks and fabrication equipment capable of building a ship, defined as
watercraft typically suitable or intended for other than personal or recreational use. Boats are
defined as watercraft typically suitable or intended for personal use.
• The applicant’s business is the construction of personal catamarans and custom-built
sportfishing boats.
• The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing site which includes two full access
driveways onto Capital Drive, parking on the northern, western, and southern sides of the
N Existing Parking
Existing 13,820 square
Industrial Facility
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
D
r
i
v
e
Existing sidewalks
Existing Fence and Gate
Fenced-in paved area
Existing Parking
Existing Landscaping
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 3
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 4 of 10
building, loading bays on the northern side of the building, and a gravel outdoor area in the
eastern rear of the building.
• The Murrayville Station Business Park is served by a regional stormwater pond located
immediately to the east of the site. The site also includes a permeable area in the eastern rear
of the building that assists with drainage. This concept plan does not indicate any areas are to
be used for outdoor storage. If approved, any future proposed outdoor storage would be
considered a major deviation and require review and approval through the quasi-judicial
hearing process.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
• The Ship and Boat Building is permitted in the I-1 district with the approval of a Special Use
Permit.
• While industrial in nature, the proposed use is not classified as an Intensive Industry in the
Unified Development Ordinance, and no community meeting was required for this
application.
• The property was zoned (CZD) I-1 in February 1995 as part of a larger 62.5-acre rezoning for
the Murrayville Station Business Park. The project consisted of a mix of conditional B-1, B-2,
and I-1 zoning districts. The property is bordered by (CZD) I-1 zoning to the North, South, and
West, with (CZD) B-1 to the East.
• The conditional zoning for the site prohibited the following uses and activities from the I-1
portion of the project: adult entertainment, septic tank services, dry cleaning plants, noise
sensitive uses and assembly places (ex: religious institutions or event centers). All other uses
in the I-1 district are allowed under the conditions of the rezoning.
• For parking requirements Ship and Boat Building is grouped within the larger zoning land use
category of “Transportation Equipment Manufacturing”, which requires 1.5 spaces per 1,000
square feet of building. The existing building is 13,820 square feet, which requires a minimum
of 21 parking spaces. The site currently has 40 parking spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirement of the UDO.
• Site inspection by Planning staff confirmed the site has existing street yard, foundation, and
parking lot landscaping meeting the UDO requirements for the site.
• If approved, the project would be subject to the Technical Review Committee and Zoning
Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and
specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved
conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 4
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 5 of 10
AREA DEVELOPMENT
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 5
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 6 of 10
TRANSPORTATION
CURRENT CONDITIONS
Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning allows for a variety of
industrial uses.
PROPOSED ACCESS
Primary Access Full access onto Capital Drive
EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Affected Roadways N Kerr Avenue Farley Drive
Type of Roadways Minor Arterial Minor Arterial
Roadway Planning Capacity
(AADT) 15,458 15,458
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 6
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 7 of 10
Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) -
2023 6,400 2,900
Latest WMPO Point-in-Time
Count (DT) N/A N/A
Current Level of Congestion Available Available
Sources Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADWAY PROJECTS
No Nearby STIP Projects
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic Generation
by Present
Designation*
Traffic Generated
by Proposed
Project
Potential Impact
of Proposed
Project
AM Peak Hour Trips 10 23 +13
PM Peak Hour Trips 9 27 +18
Assumptions *Existing Vacant General Light Industrial ITE Code
Proposed Use – 13,820 square foot Industrial Building
Sources Source of Trip Generation: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th ed
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)
The site’s projected traffic does not exceed the 100 peak-hour trips that triggers the ordinance
requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
SUMMARY
This project proposes to occupy an existing facility in the Murrayville Station Business Park. The park is
accessed from Farley Drive to the north, by way of Kerr Ave, with right-in, right-out access from
southbound College Road through Business Drive. While the project is anticipated to generate
additional traffic compared to the current vacant general light industrial use of the building, the overall
Murrayville Business Park was designed to accommodate a variety of industrial and manufacturing
uses. The site does not meet the threshold to trigger a TIA, but a driveway permit will need to be
reviewed by NCDOT.
ENVIRONMENTAL
• The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or the Special Flood Hazard Area.
• The property is within the Smith Creek watershed.
• Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class II (Moderate Limitation) soils; however, the site is currently served by
CFPUA water and sewer.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 7
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 8 of 10
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Context and Compatibility
• The project proposes to occupy an existing industrial building inside the Murrayville Station
Business Park. The park was approved in 1995 as a 62.5-acre business park with areas for
commercial and industrial uses.
• Nearby uses in the (CZD) I-1 section of the business park include an HVAC contractor, tile
contractor, cabinet design and manufacturing, camshaft manufacturing, and marine
machining and welding.
• The park is located between the airport to the west and the College Road to the east,
approximately 0.5 miles north of the College Road, Gordon Road, and I-40 interchange.
• The site is currently served by CFPUA for utilities with a regional stormwater pond for the
business park.
• The site currently complies with the requirements of the UDO and no changes are proposed
to the site.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted
as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Employment Center
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 8
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 9 of 10
Place Type
Description
Employment Center: Serves as an employment and production hub where
office and light industrial uses predominate. It can also include residential,
civic, and recreational uses, but should be clearly delineated from rural and
conservation areas. Commercial uses designed to serve the needs of the
employment center are appropriate.
Analysis
The property is centrally located in the Murrayville Station Business Park
between the airport and the College Road corridor and nearby land uses in
the park include manufacturing and contractor uses.
The Employment Center Place type was applied to the business park,
including the subject parcel, in 2016 to ensure the area remained focused on
office, commercial, and light industrial uses.
The site is served by existing infrastructure and the project does not propose
any changes to the site.
Proposed Conditions
There are no applicant Proposed Conditions.
PRELIMINARY FORUM
The Planning Board does not make a decision or recommendation on special use permits. The
board is requested to hear the presentation of staff, the applicant, and the public to facilitate an
open and transparent discussion of the special use permit application. Questions and comments
related to the following topics are encouraged:
• Components of the proposal that are not clear or where additional information is needed to
understand the project,
• Advice to the applicant on the presentation they will be giving to the Board of
Commissioners,
• Advice to the parties speaking in opposition on what they may want to consider when
preparing for the Board of Commissioners meeting, and
• Advice to both parties on potential issues that should be addressed before the public
hearing.
Following the Preliminary Forum the special use permit will be scheduled for the October 6 Board of
Commissioners meeting for a quasi-judicial hearing. There are four principal conclusions the Board
of Commissioners must make when considering a special use permit request based on clear,
substantial evidence presented at the hearing.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 9
S25-07 Staff Summary – Planning Board 1-8-2026 Page 10 of 10
• Conclusion 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public
health or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and
approved.
• Conclusion 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and
specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance.
• Conclusion 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of
adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity.
• Conclusion 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed
according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it
is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New
Hanover County.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 2 - 10
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 5 - 1
Initial Application
Documents & Materials
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 2
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 3
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 4
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 5
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 6
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 7
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 8
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 9
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 10
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 11
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 7 - 12
Concept Plan
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 9 - 1
Public Comments
In Support 0
Neutral 0
In Opposition 0
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 1 - 10 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/8/2026
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Amy Doss, Development Review Planner
CONTACT(S): Amy Doss; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning and Land
Use Director
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Rezoning Request – (Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes) – Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solu;ons, applicant, on
behalf of Leo Nguyen, property owners, to rezone approximately 1.16 acres located at 7244 Carolina Beach Road
and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15, Residen;al to a (CZD) R-5, Residen;al Moderate-High Density district for
a maximum of 9 aCached dwelling units in the form of duplex, triplex and quadraplex units.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to develop nine a"ached single-family dwellings, consis%ng of one duplex, one triplex, and one
quadruplex. The property is bounded by Carolina Beach Road to the east, the private roadway Red Lighthouse Lane to
the south, and a 30-foot-wide unimproved private access easement for Li"le Pony Trail along the northern boundary.
The Li"le Pony Trail easement runs along the northern property line and terminates approximately five feet behind
Units 4 through 9 as shown on the concept plan. A Type A opaque buffer is also required along this boundary; however,
because required landscaping cannot encroach into or obstruct an access easement, staff an%cipates the site layout
will need to be revised to locate the buffer outside of the exis%ng easement. In addi%on, sidewalks are only shown on
one side of the street and required on both sides of the street in the R-5 district. Given the limited size of the site, staff
cannot determine at this %me whether the necessary revisions would qualify as a minor devia%on should the rezoning
be approved.
Under exis%ng zoning, the site is es%mated to generate approximately 3 AM and 4 PM peak-hour trips. The proposed
development is projected to generate 8 AM and 10 PM peak-hour trips, represen%ng an increase of about 5 AM and 6
PM peak-hour trips. Students residing in the development would be assigned to Anderson Elementary, Murray Middle,
and Ashley High Schools, with the project expected to generate approximately two addi%onal students compared to
development under current zoning.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Community Mixed Use, which encourages small-scale, compact
development pa"erns that support mul%ple modes of travel and serve both residents and visitors. This designa%on
allows a range of uses, including office, retail, mixed use, recrea%onal, commercial, ins%tu%onal, and both mul%-family
and single-family residen%al development.
The proposed (CZD) R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the proposed
housing type and density is within the range recommended by the Community Mixed Use place type, and the project
includes addi%onal condi%ons to mi%gate poten%al impacts on neighboring development.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff’s recommenda%on is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considera%ons, and
technical review. The proposed development is within the density recommended by the Community Mixed Use place
type and would act as a transi%on between the highway and lower density single-family development. Upon review of
the concept plan however, staff noted several technical issues such as proposed transi%onal buffer landscaping within
an access easement and sidewalks on only one side of the street that call the viability of the proposed rezoning into
ques%on without future substan%al modifica%ons.
As a result, staff recommends DENIAL of the proposal.
Please refer to the Script for suggested and alterna;ve mo;on language.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip%on
Z25-18 PB Script
Z25-18 PB Staff Report
Z25-18 Zoning Map
Z25-18 Future Land Use Map
Z25-18 Mailout Map
Z25-18 Initial Application Cover Sheet
Z25-18 Initial Application
Z25-18 Concept Plan Cover Sheet
Z25-18 Concept Plan
Z25-18 Public Comment Cover Sheet
Z25-18 Public Comments
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2
PLANNING BOARD SCRIPT
for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z25-18)
Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, applicant, on behalf of Leo Nguyen, property
owners, to rezone approximately 1.16 acres located at 7244 Carolina Beach Road and 825 Red
Lighthouse Lane from R-15, Residential to a (CZD) R-5, Residential Moderate-High Density
district for a maximum of 9 attached dwelling units in the form of duplex, triplex and
quadraplex units.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional
5 minutes for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s and supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s and supporters’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
f. Staff review of any additional conditions
3. Board discussion (including discussion with legal and staff on any additional
conditions)
4. Close the public hearing
5. Before we proceed with a motion and vote, I would like to invite the applicant to
the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public
hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed
with a vote?
6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change
is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Denial
I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed housing
type and density is within the range recommended by the Community Mixed Use place
type. However, I also find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the project proposes encroachments into
an existing access easement and does not include the required amount of sidewalks.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1
Alternative Motion for Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
proposed housing type and density is within the range recommended by the Community
Mixed Use place type, and I find it to have technical issues that can be worked through
during the TRC process, I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project acts as a transition
between the highway and neighboring single-family development and the applicant and
staff proposed conditions can help address technical issues and potential impacts on
nearby development.
Recommended Conditions
1. Structures shall have a maximum building height of 35 feet.
2. The 21-inch DBH water oak located in the designated open space between units
5 and 6 shall be protected during construction and preserved.
3. Exterior luminaries, including security lighting, shall be full cut-off fixtures that
are directed downward in compliance with Figure 5.5.4.C Full Cut-off Fixtures of
the Unified Development Ordinance.
4. Land uses shall be limited to dual unit attached, triplex, and quadraplex
dwellings.
5. Each dwelling unit shall have a one-car garage and a minimum of two exterior
parking spaces on a private driveway parking pad. A minimum of five additional
vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in addition to the vehicle parking
provided for each unit.
6. In addition to the 21-inch water oak, all other existing trees outside essential site
improvements shall be permanently retained on site.
7. The project shall provide a minimum 28.7% open space.
8. A minimum 20-foot-wide public access easement shall be dedicated along the
frontage and parallel to Carolina Beach Road for future bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) R-5
district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 1 of 14
STAFF REPORT FOR Z25-18
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: Z25-18
Request:
Rezoning to a Conditional R-5 district
Applicant: Property Owner(s):
Cindee Wolf, Design Solutions Leo L. Nguyen
Location: Acreage:
825 Red Lighthouse Lane, & 7244 Carolina Beach
Road 1.16
PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type:
R08500-002-035-000; R08500-002-063-000 Community Mixed-Use
Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use:
Undeveloped Nine (9) attached single-family units (dual-unit
attached, triplex, quadraplex)
Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
R-15, Residential (CZD) R-5, Residential
SURROUNDING AREA
LAND USE ZONING
North Single-Family Residential R-15
East Budget Storage, and Boat / RV storage (Case Z-965) (CZD) B-2
South Single-Family Residential R-15
West Single-Family Residential R-15
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 1
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 2 of 14
ZONING HISTORY
April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 4)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Water/Sewer
CFPUA water and sewer are not available in the area. Private utility provider
AQUA serves the existing Red Lighthouse Village, and AQUA has provided
preliminary cost estimates and potential connection locations for this project.
Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire
District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station
Schools Anderson Elementary, Murray Middle, and Ashley High Schools
Recreation Veterans Park
CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Conservation No known conservation resources.
Historic No known historic resources
Archaeological No known archaeological resources
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 2
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 3 of 14
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Applicant’s Concept Plan - Includes Staff Markups
The applicant is proposing to construct nine (9) attached single-family dwellings in the form of
one dual unit structure, one triplex, and one quadraplex.
The site proposes a full access driveway onto Red Lighthouse Lane. Red Lighthouse Lane is
right-in, right-out access only onto Carolina Beach Road. The president of the Red Lighthouse
Subdivision Homeowners Association has authorized the applicant to act as their registered
Lea Landing Drive
Proposed
Stormwater
Triplex
Single Family
Quadraplex
Single Family
Guest
Parking
Dual Unit
Single Family
Fence
Sidewalk
20
’
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
c
c
e
s
s
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Tree to be
Preserved
30’
Private
Access
Easement
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 3
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 4 of 14
agent of the rezoning application, and the application indicates the developer and HOA are in
discussions to guarantee access and maintenance.
The site is bordered by Carolina Beach Road to the east, the private road Red Lighthouse Lane
to the south, and a 30-foot-wide unimproved private access easement for Little Pony Trail to
the north.
The easement for Little Pony Trail runs along the northern property line and ends
approximately 5 feet off the rear of units 4 through 9 on the concept plan. In addition, a Type
A opaque buffer is required along the northern boundary. Because landscaping cannot
encroach or block an access easement, staff anticipates the site will need to be redesigned to
accommodate the landscaping outside existing easements. Due to the size of the site, staff
cannot verify whether the extent of the required changes would constitute a minor deviation
if the rezoning were approved.
The project proposes three parking spaces for each unit: two in the driveway and a one-car
garage. In addition, four guest parking spaces have been proposed between units 5 and 6 on
the concept plan. Staff has recommended a condition requiring the three parking spaces per
unit and the guest parking.
The concept plan proposes 28.7% open space, 8.7% above the minimum required by the
ordinance. And while the concept plan identifies six existing trees on site outside the
development area, only one tree is proposed for permanent retention. Staff has
recommended a condition guaranteeing the minimum open space of 28.7% and that existing
trees that do not impact the proposed development, including changes to the site plan that
constitute minor deviations, shall be preserved.
The concept plan also includes a 20-foot-wide public access easement along Carolina Beach
Road. Staff has recommended a condition guaranteeing the access easement.
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
The R-15 district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the district
was to ensure housing served by private well and septic would be developed at low densities.
Since that time, private water and sewer utilities have become available in the area.
As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed three (3) single-family dwelling units.
The R-5 district was established to provide land that accommodates moderate to high density
residential development on smaller lots with a compact and walkable development pattern.
The district allows a range of housing types and can be developed in conjunction with a non-
residential district to create a mixed-use development pattern as well as serve as a transition
between mixed-use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential
development.
Since its original zoning designation in 1971, this portion of the county and the Carolina Beach
Road corridor has seen an increase in higher density residential and commercial projects.
Section 6.3.3.J.1.d of the UDO requires sidewalks on both sides of the street. The sidewalk is
only shown on one side of the street in the concept plan. However, if approved, the applicant
has the option to request a reduction in the sidewalk requirement during the TRC site plan
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 4
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 5 of 14
review process due to the provision in 6.3.3.J.2 that an exemption may be requested upon a
finding that sidewalks are unnecessary for the protection of the public safety or welfare due
to conditions peculiar to the site.
While the maximum building height in both the R-15 and R-5 districts is 40 feet, the applicant
has included a condition capping the maximum height at 35 feet tall.
If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning
compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and
specific conditions included in the approval.
AREA DEVELOPMENTS
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 5
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 6 of 14
TRANSPORTATION
CURRENT CONDITIONS
Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning would allow a maximum
of 3 single-family dwelling units.
PROPOSED ACCESS
Primary Access Red Lighthouse Lane
Secondary Access N/A
EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Affected Roadway Red Lighthouse Lane Carolina Beach Road
Type of Roadway Private ROW NCDOT Major Arterial
Access
Easement
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 6
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 7 of 14
ENVIRONMENTAL
The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area.
The property is within the Telfair Creek watershed.
Roadway Planning Capacity
(AADT) Not available 34,000
Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) Not available 41,368 (2023)
Latest WMPO Point-in-Time
Count (DT) Not available 36,787 (2025)
Current Level of Congestion Not available Over Capacity
NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADAWAY PROJECTS
No Nearby STIP Projects
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic Generated
by Present
Designation
Traffic Generated
by Proposed
Designation
Potential Impact
of Proposed
Designation
AM Peak Hour Trips 3 8 +5
PM Peak Hour Trips 4 10 +6
Assumptions
Typical Development with Existing Conditions – 3 single family
detached dwellings
Proposed Development – 9-unit attached single-family development
Sources Source of Trip Generation: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)
The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the
ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
SUMMARY
The proposed project is located along a major highway that is currently over capacity, but it is expected
to add only a small amount of traffic beyond what is allowed under current zoning. The site will be
accessed from Red Lighthouse Lane, which includes a right-in turn lane from Carolina Beach Road and
allows right-out movements only. There are no State Transportation Improvement Program projects
planned in the area to address existing conditions. Although other nearby developments are under
review or under construction and their traffic studies did not specifically include this project, those
studies accounted for general traffic growth in the area. The project’s peak-hour traffic is below the
threshold that would require a traffic impact analysis, but NCDOT will still review the project as part of
the driveway permitting process.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 7
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 8 of 14
The New Hanover County Conservation Resources map indicates there are no conservation
resources on the property.
Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the
property consist of Class I (suitable) soils. The project proposes a connection to private AQUA
water and sewer.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Schools
PUBLIC SCHOOL ENROLLMENT ZONES
Elementary School Anderson Elementary
2025-2026 Capacity 83%
Middle School Murray Middle
2025-2026 Capacity 96%
High School Ashley High
2025-2026 Capacity 96%
STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGRs)
Overall SGR (25-26) 0.19 public school students per residential unit
Elementary School SGR (25-26) 0.08 public school students per residential unit
Middle School SGR (25-26) 0.04 public school students per residential unit
High School SGR (25-26) 0.06 public school students per residential unit
SGR Trend (20-21 to 25-26) Decrease of 0.05 public school students per residential
unit
POTENTIAL PROJECT STUDENT IMPACT
Intensity of Current Zoning: Typical Development under current zoning would allow
a maximum of 3 residential units.
Proposed Development: 9 residential units
Students
Generated by
Current Zoning
Students
Generated by
Proposed
Zoning
Potential Impact
of Proposed
Project
Elementary School 0 1 +1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 8
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 9 of 14
New Hanover County Strategic Plan
On July 17, 2023 the Board of Commissioners adopted a new strategic plan for Fiscal Years 2024-2028.
This plan focuses on three core areas: workforce and economic development, community safety and
well-being, and sustainable land use and environmental stewardship.
Strategic Plan Outcomes Relevant to
Proposal Analysis
Through planned growth and development,
residents have access to their basic needs.
The strategic objective to achieve this desired
outcome includes the provision of a variety of
housing options. The proposed CZD R-5
rezoning will provide new attached single-family
homes in an area of the county that is largely
single-family, detached and can aid in achieving
the target of increasing the housing supply to a
level of one residential unit per every two
residents.
Middle School 0 0 0
High School 0 1 +1
TOTAL 0 2 +2
Sources
2025-2026 NHC Student Yield Analysis based on NHCS
school population and capacity numbers and NHC
building permit data
SUMMARY
The proposed project is anticipated to be built out within five years, and currently, the middle
school and high school serving this area are nearing capacity. However, the students generated by
the proposed development are minimal and should have a limited impact on the area’s public
schools.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 9
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 10 of 14
Representative Developments
Representative Developments of R-15:
Red Lighthouse Lane
Red Lighthouse Lane
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 10
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 11 of 14
Representative Developments of Attached Single-Faily Development:
Echo Farms
Context and Compatibility
The property is located along Carolina Beach Road bordered by detached single-family
residential development to the north, west and south, and (CZD) B-2 to the east across
Carolina Beach Road. The site has access to Red Lighthouse Lane which has a right-in, right-
out access onto Carolina Beach Road.
The Carolina Beach Road corridor has historically been developed as lower density detached
single-family homes. The site is currently a wooded lot separating single family dwellings
from Carolina Beach Road.
Due to the location and surrounding development patterns, the property is less likely to be
developed with low density housing.
While the 2016 Comprehensive Plan recommends a mixture of commercial uses and
residential densities ranging from 8 to 15 dwelling units per acre, over the past two years as
staff has worked on the Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan update, the vision for the
Carolina Beach Road corridor has shifted to discouraging higher density residential projects
to protect the character of adjacent existing neighborhoods and in recognition of limited
roadway connectivity and infrastructure capacity in the southern portion of the county. In
the draft plan, commercial development is encouraged along this corridor to provide basic
goods and services to existing residents.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 11
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 12 of 14
The application and concept plan include some conditions intended to reduce impacts on
adjacent properties, however due to the easement along the northern property line staff
anticipates changes to the final site design that may or may not require a major modification
to the site and review by the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners.
2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for
New Hanover County’s future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and
function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are
intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted
as being parcel specific.
Future Land Use
Map Place Type Community Mixed Use
Place Type
Description
Focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve
all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors.
Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational,
commercial, institutional, and multi-family and single-family residential.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 12
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 13 of 14
Analysis
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Community Mixed Use,
a land use classification that promotes a mix of retail, office, and residential
development at moderate densities up to 15 units per acre. This place type is
generally intended for community-level service nodes or transitional areas
between lower density housing and higher intensity development, specifically
identifying the Carolina Beach Road corridor as appropriate for higher-
intensity development.
At eight dwelling units per acre, the proposed maximum density for the site
is within the density recommendation of the place type. Given the parcel size
and direct access to Carolina Beach Road, it is not anticipated to be developed
for low-density, detached single-family housing. Additional conditions related
to building height, and landscape buffers are intended to both mimic the
surrounding development pattern and reduce impacts on adjacent parcels.
While the 2016 Comprehensive Plan generally supports higher density
residential development, site specific constraints related to the existing
easement are anticipated to impact the development of the site.
Consistency
Recommendation
The proposed (CZD) R-5 district is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because the proposed housing type and density is within
the range recommended by the Community Mixed Use place type, and the
project includes additional conditions to mitigate potential impacts on
neighboring development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff’s recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning
considerations, and technical review. The proposed development is within the density recommended
by the Community Mixed Use place type and would act as a transition between the highway and lower
density single-family development. Upon review of the concept plan however, staff noted several
technical issues such as proposed transitional buffer landscaping within an access easement and
sidewalks on only one side of the street that call the viability of the proposed rezoning into question
without future substantial modifications.
As a result, Staff recommends denial of the proposal and suggests the following motion:
I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT
with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed housing
type and density is within the range recommended by the Community Mixed Use place
type. However, I also find RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is
reasonable and in the public interest because the project proposes encroachments into
an existing access easement and does not include the required amount of sidewalks.
Alternative Motion for APPROVAL (if based on information presented at the public hearing or other
consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the board finds approval appropriate.)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 13
Z25-18 Staff Report PB 1.8.2025 Page 14 of 14
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the
proposed housing type and density is within the range recommended by the Community
Mixed Use place type, and I find it to have technical issues that can be worked through
during the TRC process, I also find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request
is reasonable and in the public interest because the project acts as a transition between
the highway and neighboring single-family development and the applicant and staff
proposed conditions can help address technical issues and potential impacts on nearby
development.
Recommended Conditions
1. Structures shall have a maximum building height of 35 feet.
2. The 21-inch DBH water oak located in the designated open space between units 5 and 6
shall be protected during construction and preserved.
3. Exterior luminaries, including security lighting, shall be full cut-off fixtures that are
directed downward in compliance with Figure 5.5.4.C Full Cut-off Fixtures of the Unified
Development Ordinance.
4. Land uses shall be limited to dual unit attached, triplex, and quadraplex dwellings.
5. Each dwelling unit shall have a one-car garage and a minimum of two exterior parking
spaces on a private driveway parking pad. A minimum of five additional vehicle parking
spaces shall be provided in addition to the vehicle parking provided for each unit.
6. In addition to the 21-inch water oak, all other existing trees outside essential site
improvements shall be permanently retained on site.
7. The project shall provide a minimum 28.7% open space.
8. A minimum 20-foot-wide public access easement shall be dedicated along the frontage
and parallel to Carolina Beach Road for future bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 2 - 14
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 3 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 5 - 1
Initial Application
Documents & Materials
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 6 - 1
Page 1 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165
FAX (910) 798-7053
PlanNHC.com
CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION
This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county’s
online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the
flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards applied in reviewing
the application for completeness are found in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Public Hearing Procedures
(Optional)
Pre-
Application
Meeting
1
Community
Information
Meeting
2
Application
Submittal &
Acceptance
3
Planning
Director
Review & Staff
Report (TRC
Optional)
4
Public Hearing
Scheduling &
Notification
5
Planning
Board Hearing
& Recom -
mendation
6
Board of
Commissioners
Hearing &
Decision
7
Post-Decision
Limitations
and Actions
1.Applicant and Property Owner Information
Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent)
Company Company/Owner Name 2
Address Address
City, State, Zip City, State, Zip
Phone Phone
Email Email
Design Solutions
Cindee Wolf
P.O. Box 7221
Wilmington, NC 28406
910-620-2374
cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Leo L. Nguyen
5219 Crosswinds Drive
Wilmington, NC 28409
910-262-3308 (Lisa Nguyen)
lisalcn@yahoo.com
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 1
Page 2 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
2. Subject Property Information
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Land Use(s)
Future Land Use Classification
3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s) & Narrative
Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration in a
Conditional Zoning District.
Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District:
Maximum Residential Density (if applicable): Housing Type(s) (if applicable):
Maximum Square Footage of Non-
Residential Use(s) (if applicable):
Proposed Non-Residential Land Use(s) (if applicable):
Please provide a statement about the purpose of the district and a project narrative (attach additional
pages if necessary).
825 Red Lighthouse Lane & 7244 Carolina Beach Road 313218.41.6059 & 313218.41.6231
1.16 ac. (50.337.s.f.)R-15 / Vacant
Community Mixed-Use
(CZD) R-5 1.16 ac. (50.337.s.f.)
9 total units (8 units/acre)(1) Dwelling, Dual Unit Attached / (1) Dwelling, Triplex /(1) Dwelling, Quadraplex
N/A N/A
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 2
Page 3 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
4. Proposed Condition(s)
Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater
restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations
may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the
surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below.
Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review
process.
5. Traffic Impact
Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based on the most
recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual.
Developments that generate 100 or more trips in the AM or PM peak hour must include a complete TIA
with the application materials. The TIA must be approved by NCDOT and the WMPO before the item can
be considered by the Board of Commissioners.
Recommendation: Before applying contact the WMPO to confirm the most appropriate ITE code and traffic
generation rate is being applied. If the information has been verified, please attach a copy of the verification
with the application.
Unverified information submitted with the application may result in the application being ineligible to move
forward to a Planning Board agenda.
ITE Land Use (Code):
Trip Generation Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.):
AM Peak Hour Trips: PM Peak Hour Trips:
Single-family Attached Housing (ITE - 215)
Nine (9) Residential Units
65
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 3
Page 4 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations
The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would
be consistent with the policy guidance of the 2016 New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan, zoning
considerations, and technical review. Conditional rezonings are intended to provide orderly transitions between
different zoning districts or land uses where additional conditions and district limitations may safeguard
adjacent land uses benefiting all parties and the community at large.
The application must include an explanation of how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the
following criteria. (include references and attachments to plans where applicable).
1. How would the requested change be consistent with New Hanover County’s policies for growth and
development, as described in the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan or other applicable,
adopted plans?
2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property’s classification
on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map?
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 4
Page 5 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred that may make the original zoning
inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing
zoning?
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 5
Page 6 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
7. Application Requirements
Staff use the following checklist to determine if the application is complete. Please verify all the listed items are
included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. If an item is not applicable, mark as “N/A”. Applications
determined to be incomplete must be corrected to be processed for further review. Staff will confirm if an application
is complete within five business days of submittal.
Applicants are encouraged to arrange an informal pre-application meeting with Planning staff at least two weeks
before applying. Pre-application meetings help improve the chances of submitting a complete application.
Application Checklist And Acknowledgement
Applicant
Initial
This application form, completed and signed (all property owners must
sign signatory page) _____
Copy of most recent annual filing identifying the owners / officers /
managers from the Secretary of State’s Business Registry for any LLCs or
other companies listed on the application.
_____
Application fee:
• $600 for 5 acres or less
• $700 for more than 5 acres
_____
Community Information Meeting Report (complete and signed by
authorized agent or all property owners) _____
Traffic Impact Analysis if applicable (use of attached report document is
recommended)
• The official TIA approval letter is recommended before this item is
placed on a Planning Board agenda. The Planning Boad may choose
to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is
provided.
• The official TIA approval letter is required before this item is placed
on a Board of Commissioners agenda.
______
Legal description (by metes and bounds) or a recorded survey with Map
Book and Page reference of the property or area requested for rezoning. ______
Conceptual Plan including the following minimum information. Not if
information beyond the minimum requirements is shown on the concept
plan they may be considered conditions of approval and may not be eligible
for approval as a minor deviation.
• Tract boundaries and total acreage
• Location of adjoining parcels and roads
• Proposed land use, building areas and other improvements
o Residential uses: include the maximum density, unit count,
height, and type of housing, maximum area occupied by
structures, and proposed subdivision boundaries.
______
CAW
CAW
CAW
CAW
N/A
CAW
CAW
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 6
Page 7 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
o Non-Residential uses: include the maximum square footage
and height of each structure, an outline of the area
structures will occupy, the specific purpose / land use and
how each structure will be used.
• Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including
proposed rights-of-way and roadways, proposed access to and from
the site, and arrangement and access to parking areas.
• All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights-of-
way, and buffers.
• The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas.
• For sites less than 5 acres in size a tree survey is required identifying
the exact location, species and size of all specimen trees on site. For
sites more than 5 acres a narrative is required describing the
existing vegetation on site including the approximate location,
species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees.
• Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities
intended to serve the site.
• Approximate location of regulated wetlands.
• Location of any existing wells or septic systems on site.
• Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater
restrictions on development and use of the tract than the
corresponding general use district regulations or additional
limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local
ordinance.
Documentation on soil types and infiltration rates if underground
stormwater facilities are proposed. _____
One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans _____
CAW
CAW
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 7
Page 8 of 8
Conditional Rezoning Application – Updated 10-2025
8. Acknowledgement and Signatures
Note: This form must be signed by the property owner(s) of record. A signature is required for each
owner of record if there are multiple owners.
By signing below, I understand and accept the following:
x All the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the conditional rezoning process for which I am
applying.
x That the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct.
x I certify that this application is complete, and all information presented in this application is accurate
to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
x I am legally able to make decisions regarding the subject property and apply for this application to
make changes to the subject property.
x If applicable, I also appoint the applicant / agent listed on this application to represent me and make
decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process.
x The applicant / agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to:
1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials;
2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments;
3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly
connected with or arising out of this application; and
4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval.
x An authorized agent or the property owner will attend each public hearing scheduled for the
application to represent the request and answer questions if called upon.
x If changes are made to the proposal after the application completeness determination that
require additional staff review and vetting, the changes will be ineligible to move forward to the
intended Planning Board agenda. No changes will be accepted by staff after the applications are
posted at the time of public notice.
x If a request is made to delay consideration by the Planning Board or Board of Commissioners
before public notice has been sent out in the mail or to the newspaper, the item will be
calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has
been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are
under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance
with the county’s adopted fee schedule will be required.
_____________________________________________________ _________________ ___________
Signature of Property Owner / Authorized Agent Print Name Date
_____________________________________________________ _________________ ___________
Signature of Property Owner / Authorized Agent Print Name Date
Cindee Wolf
Leo L. Nguyen
Docusign Envelope ID: F95380EA-D7EE-4B9C-855A-CD4B2EFC2B60
12/3/2025
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 8
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 9
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 10
Legal DescripƟon for
CondiƟonal Zoning District at
825 Red Lighthouse Lane & 7244 Carolina Beach Road
Beginning at a point in the western boundary of Carolina Beach Road / U.S. Hwy. 421, a 160’
public right-of-way; said point being at the intersecƟon with the northern boundary of a thirty-
foot (30’) private access roadway known as Red Lighthouse Lane; and running thence with that
roadway easement:
North 89012’38” West, 194.62 feet to a point; thence
North 00019’28” East, 83.70 feet to a point; thence
North 89017’51” West, 52.70 feet to a point; thence
North 01011’09” East, 133.95 feet to a point; thence
South 88048’50” East, 252.56 feet to a point in the western boundary of Carolina Beach Road;
Thence with that right-of-way,
Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 1675.69 feet and Length of 216.04 feet, a Chord
Of South 02014’35” West, 215.89 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing
50,337 square feet, or 1.16 acres, more or less.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 11
Page 1 of 2
Community Information Meeting Report – Approved 06-2022
NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE
230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone (910) 798-7165 Nhcgov.com/528/Planning-Land-Use
COMMUNITY INFORMATION MEETING REPORT
This Community Information Meeting Report must be submitted with the application for a conditional rezoning, planned
development, or intensive industry special use permit in order for the application to be deemed complete.
Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s)
Meeting Date and Time
Format (Virtual, In-Person, Hybrid) Location if In-Person or Hybrid
Selection Criteria for Location
Meeting Summary
Issues and Concerns Discussed at Meeting
825 Red Lighthouse Lane & 7244 Carolina Beach Road 313218.41.6059 & 313218.41.6231
Wednesday, August 27th, 6:00 p.m.
In-person w/ info for contact by phone or email River Road Park Shelter - 6500 River Road
Proximity to the subject project site
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 12
Page 2 of 2
Community Information Meeting Report – Approved 06-2022
List of Changes and Modifications Made to the Proposal in Response to Issues and Concerns (if no modifications
were made, please explain why)
Report Attachments
All of the following items must be submitted as part of the required community information meeting report in addition
to this form.
Checklist Applicant Initial
A list of names and addresses of attendees
A list of the names and addresses of invitees and copies of any returned mailings received to date
A copy of the mailed notice with all attachments
A copy of all materials distributed or presented at the meeting
Acknowledgement and Signatures
By my signature below, I hereby certify that written notice of the community information meeting as described above was mailed and/or personal delivery to property owners withing 500 feet of the subject site as set forth on the attached list, by first class mail on [DATE] _____________________________. A copy of the written notice is also attached. I also herby certify that the meeting summary and list of attendees is accurate and representative of the proceedings at the community information meeting.
Signature of Applicant or Applicant’s Agent Print Name
Date
August 15, 2025
Cindee Wolf / Design Solutions
12/01/25
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 13
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 14
From:Jim Bowes
To:cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Subject:Beacon Townhouses
Date:Sunday, August 24, 2025 9:22:38 AM
I have strong objections to the development. The impact of a minimum of 9 to 18 vehicles
plus all the services vehicular traffic (UPS, garbage, etc.) on the traffic flow of Carolina Beachwould be very dangerous. If this development is completed as planned; there will be 6 access
points to Carolina Beach in less than 2/10th of a mile between Inlet Acres and Red LighthouseLane. With the proximity of the u-turn lane to the south; drivers attempting to shorten their
northward travel will make bad choices leading to serious accidents. Traffic on CB is alreadyvery heavy year around and then gets worse during the tourist season. This development will
make this situation worse for everyone. As a homeowner on Lea Landing Dr, it is alreadydifficult to merge onto CB coordinating with the unnamed sand road to the north and Little
Pony Trail to the south. Another highway access so close to LPT would make this worse.
CB is a highway (US-421) with a speed limit of 55 mph and not a residential road that canhandle unlimited access.
James Bowes
833 Lea Landing DrWilmington, NC
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 15
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 16
PROPERTIES WITHIN A 500' PERIMETER OF 7244 CAROLINA BEACH RD
& 825 RED LIGHTHOUSE LANE
OWNER ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP
841 LEA LANDING LLC 841 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
BARBOUR BROOKS DOUGLAS 738 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
BENSON NICHOLAS H 1006 CYPRESS DR WILMINGTON NC 28401
BLIZZARD RANDY MELODY 804 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
BOWES JAMES W JR JO ANN 833 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
BRINKLEY RENITA 814 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
BRUNNER TIMOTHY LAURAINE 816 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
CAD PROPERTIES LLC 1412 RICOCHET DR RALEIGH NC 27610
CAPE FEAR BAPTIST CHURCH PO BOX 705 CAROLINA BCH NC 28428
CAULDER SHELIA 818 INLET ACRES DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
CHAIMOWITZ ROBERT B 821 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
COMBS CLARICE S 815 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
DUMONT JASON K 113 APACHE TRL WILMINGTON NC 28409
DUMONT RENEE D ETAL 869 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
EADDY STEPHEN KRISTIN N 853 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
ERS INVESTMENTS LLC 711 N CAROLINA BEACH AVE CAROLINA BCH NC 28428
FULL CIRCLE CONST LLC 816 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
FUTCH ROSA B HRS PO BOX 15538 WILMINGTON NC 28408
GAGNE PAUL 804 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
GARRETT DON D 809 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
GODESKY DWIGHT J ETAL 2001 TOT HILL FARM RD ASHEBORO NC 27205
GURGANUS BOBBY D SUE S 857 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
LEA LANDING HOA 6626 GORDON RD UNIT C WILMINGTON NC 28411
MACNULTY HOME DTLG INC 302 GODFREY CT WILMINGTON NC 28412
MAGNIFICENT SIX LLC 8620 RIVER RD WILMINGTON NC 28412
MCGEE DARRYL JULIA G PO BOX 389 CAROLINA BCH NC 28428
MIDGARD SELF STOR WILM 7275 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON NC 28412
MISHOE ZACHARY H 865 LEA LADING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
MONAGHAN PETER PAT HEIRS 807 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
MORRIS SAMMIE L 718 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
NAU JOEL JENNIFER 914 TARPON DR WILMINGTON NC 28409
RAYNOR TIMOTHY NICOLE 845 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
RED LIGHTHOUSE VILLAGE HOA PO BOX 901 CAROLINA BCH NC 28428
ROBINSON CLIFFORD L 820 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
RUST KEITH 612 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
SALTWATER WOODWORKING 119 BRYAN RD WILMINGTON NC 28412
SHEAR STEPHANIE L ETAL 129 PAINTED ROCK CT GARNER NC 27529
SIMMONS BONNIE HEIRS 7308 N WADE SCHOOL RD APT D COLUMBIA MO 65202
SMITHIES DIANE L 810 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
STEPHENSON JAMES JR SUSAN 2855 MT PLEASANT RD WILLOW SPRING NC 27592
T BIRD PROPERTY RENTALS LLC 406 MOHICAN TRL WILMINGTON NC 28409
THOMAS FLETHER III PO BOX 15538 WILMINGTON NC 28408
THOMPSON JOHN JULIE 808 LITTLE PONY TRL WILMINGTON NC 28412
THOMPSON JOHN JULIE ETAL 505 S CAROLINA AVE CAROLINA BCH NC 28428
TRUESDALE KEMIA E 861 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
VINNY INC 810 SHELTON CT WILMINGTON NC 28412
WAGNER JAMES J 803 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
WASHINGTON SHANNON C 837 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412
WILLIAMS AVIS G ETAL 802 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
WINGO REUBEN W ET AL 818 RED LIGHTHOUSE LN WILMINGTON NC 28412
WISZ ELIZABETH R 849 LEA LANDING DR WILMINGTON NC 28412Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 17
P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
August 11, 2025
Re: Beacon Townhomes
Dear Mr. Gross:
I am reaching out to you with the understanding that you may be the current President of the
Lighthouse Village community? I happened to run into a woman walking the Lane, who said
she also served on the Board, and she directed me your way. If not, I’d certainly appreciate
referral to the best person.
I am a Development Consultant, working with the owner of the properties at the entryway to
your neighborhood – 7224 Carolina Beach Road, and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane. We will be
pursuing approval of a Conditional District rezoning in the near future.
I’m guessing that the approach and turning onto Red Lighthouse Lane is a bit precarious based
on the Lea Landing Drive and Little Pony Trail intersections just to the north? I am hoping for
an opportunity to take just a few minutes of your time to discuss an alternative access from Red
Lighthouse Lane. Exhibits of both scenarios are attached.
My thoughts were to broach the possibility of this small community joining in with Lighthouse
Village in use of the Red Lighthouse Lane access, rather than creating a new driveway. My
owner would possibly make an initial payment into your COA towards the existing asset, and
then each of the new homes would pay monthly dues for future maintenance.
Could you please contact me at telephone # 910-620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz, at
your earliest convenience?
Respectfully,
Cindee Wolf
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 18
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 19
P.O. Box 7221, Wilmington, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodemar.biz
Community Information
August 15, 2025
To: Adjacent Property Owners & Other Interested Parties
From: Cindee Wolf
Re: Beacon Townhomes
This letter is notice of a community information meeting for an upcoming rezoning request.
Leo Nguyen is the property owner of the tracts addressed at 7244 Carolina Beach Road and 825
Red Lighthouse Lane. The 1.16-acre area is currently zoned Residential (R-15). The proposed
rezone would be for a Conditional District / Residential Moderate-High Density (CZD/R-5). The
proposal is to develop a community of nine (9) “single-family / attached” homes. A site layout
is attached.
Your property is located in the proximity, within a 500’ perimeter, of the lot boundary. The
meeting is an opportunity for further explanation of the proposal and for questions to be
answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts.
A Conditional Zoning District in New Hanover County allows particular uses to be established
only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual
development project & rezoning petition. Essentially, this means that only the specific use(s)
and the proposed site improvements of an approved petition can be developed.
The meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 27th, 6:00 p.m., at the River Road Park Picnic
Shelter, 6500 River Road. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at
telephone # 910-620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz with comments and/or questions.
We appreciate your interest in the project and believe that these new homes will provide
quality housing in the southern portion of the County, be good neighbor, and be an asset to the
community.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 20
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 21
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 7 - 22
Concept Plan
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 8 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 9 - 1
Public Comments
In Support 0
Neutral 0
In Opposition 20
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 10 - 1
1
Doss, Amy
From:Watson, McCabe
Sent:Monday, December 15, 2025 12:38 PM
To:Doss, Amy
Subject:FW: Opposition to Rezoning Request – (Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes)
McCabe Watson
Planning Coordinator
New Hanover County - Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning
(910) 798-7068 p | f
mwatson@nhcgov.com
230 Government Center Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
www.NHCgov.com
From: Renee DuMont <renee.dumontahs@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2025 12:35 PM
To: Watson, McCabe <mwatson@nhcgov.com>
Subject: Opposition to Rezoning Request – (Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes)
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Chair and Honorable County Commissioners,
I am writing to formally oppose Rezoning Request Z25-18 (Beacon Townhomes). I am a
nearby resident living within 500 feet of the proposed development, and I purchased my
first home in this neighborhood in 2024 with the understanding that the surrounding
properties were zoned R-15 Residential.
The request to rezone approximately 1.16 acres at 7244 Carolina Beach Road and 825
Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15 Residential to CZD R-5 Residential Moderate-High
Density, allowing up to nine attached dwelling units, represents a significant increase in
density that is incompatible with the existing neighborhood.
Of particular concern is traffic safety. There is a known dangerous curve/turn on Carolina
Beach Road directly adjacent to the proposed development site. This stretch of road
already presents visibility and safety challenges, and adding additional driveways, turning
movements, and daily vehicle trips associated with higher-density housing would
increase the risk of accidents for residents, pedestrians, cyclists, and emergency vehicles.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 1
2
Additional concerns include:
Increased traffic volume on an already hazardous section of roadway
Strain on infrastructure, including stormwater and drainage
Incompatibility with surrounding single-family residential development
Negative impacts on neighborhood character and nearby property values
I made a substantial financial investment when purchasing my home based on the
existing zoning and land-use expectations. Approving a higher-density rezoning at this
location would undermine those expectations and set a concerning precedent for similar
requests along Carolina Beach Road.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Board deny Rezoning Request Z25-18
and maintain the current R-15 zoning, which better aligns with the safety, scale, and
character of the surrounding area.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration prior to the upcoming vote. I
appreciate your service to our community.
Sincerely,
Renee DuMont
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 2
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Monday, December 15, 2025 1:13 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29134 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Renee
Last Name DuMont
Address 869 Lea Landing Dr
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Renee.dumont2119@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment Dear Chair and Honorable County Commissioners,
I am writing to formally oppose Rezoning Request Z25-18
(Beacon Townhomes). I am a nearby resident living within 500
feet of the proposed development, and I purchased my first
home in this neighborhood in 2025 with the understanding that
the surrounding properties were zoned R-15 Residential.
The request to rezone approximately 1.16 acres at 7244
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 3
2
Carolina Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to CZD R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density,
allowing up to nine attached dwelling units, represents a
significant increase in density that is incompatible with the
existing neighborhood.
Of particular concern is traffic safety. There is a known
dangerous curve/turn on Carolina Beach Road directly
adjacent to the proposed development site. This stretch of road
already presents visibility and safety challenges, and adding
additional driveways, turning movements, and daily vehicle
trips associated with higher-density housing would increase the
risk of accidents for residents, pedestrians, cyclists, and
emergency vehicles.
Additional concerns include:
Increased traffic volume on an already hazardous section of
roadway
Strain on infrastructure, including stormwater and drainage
Incompatibility with surrounding single-family residential
development
Negative impacts on neighborhood character and nearby
property values
I made a substantial financial investment when purchasing my
home based on the existing zoning and land-use expectations.
Approving a higher-density rezoning at this location would
undermine those expectations and set a concerning precedent
for similar requests along Carolina Beach Road.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Board deny
Rezoning Request Z25-18 and maintain the current R-15
zoning, which better aligns with the safety, scale, and character
of the surrounding area.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration prior to
the upcoming vote. I appreciate your service to our community.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 4
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Monday, December 15, 2025 2:13 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29137 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Destany
Last Name Avery
Address 314, McQuillan Dr
City Wilmington
State North Carolina
Zip Code 28412
Email Destany86867@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I oppose Rezoning Request Z25-18 because higher-density
townhomes don’t fit the character of surrounding
neighborhoods and would increase traffic and congestion.
Upload supporting files
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 5
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Monday, December 15, 2025 2:32 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29138 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Emily
Last Name Garrow
Address 1404 Cameron court
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28401
Email Emilygarrow96@yahoo.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I am against Rezoning Request Z25-18. Higher-density
development here would create safety risks, traffic problems,
and doesn’t match the character of the area. Deny this request.
Upload supporting files
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 6
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Monday, December 15, 2025 3:20 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29140 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Jasmyn
Last Name Spencer
Address 4740 Sweetfern Row Apt 103
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28411
Email jasmyn.spencer@ymail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I oppose Rezoning Request Z25-18 (Beacon Townhomes).
The proposed higher-density zoning does not fit the
surrounding single-family neighborhood and raises serious
safety concerns due to the dangerous curve on Carolina Beach
Road. I respectfully ask the County Commissioners to deny this
request and keep the current R-15 zoning.
Upload supporting files
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 7
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Sunday, December 28, 2025 9:29 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29276 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Christopher
Last Name OConnor
Address 1421 Grove Point Rd
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28409-4837
Email moonpieoconnor@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment New Hanover County has been too quick to cater to the real
estate development industry and rubber-stamp rezoning
requests like this one. They haven't done anything to improve
affordability, but instead strain our infrastructure, congest our
roads in detriment to public safety, and stress our environment.
They only serve to line the pockets of the investors behind the
project.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 8
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Saturday, December 27, 2025 9:57 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29274 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Jackie
Last Name Lowe
Address 8821 west Telfair cir
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Field not completed.
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment Rezoning this to allow for higher density housing will put more
strain on our systems and add more traffic congestion to an
already growing problem. Please reconsider rezoning this!
Upload supporting files
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 9
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Saturday, December 27, 2025 9:11 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29268 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Laurie
Last Name Brunner
Address 816 Little Pony Trl
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email lobrun@hotmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment This high density tall townhomes project does not fit the look
and feel of the family housing that is currently on either sides of
this proposed project. There is already very increased traffic in
this area with all the construction projects going on and gas
stations. I oppose this project, it should not be rezoned high
density, the surrounding neighborhoods are R 15 for typical
family homes not high density tall townhomes. This would
create a traffic nightmare with surrounding neighborhoods
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 10
2
trying to make a right turn and attempting to use the u turn to
head north on Carolina Beach Road.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 11
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Saturday, December 27, 2025 8:49 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29267 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Timothy
Last Name Brunner
Address 816 little Ponytrail
City Wilmington
State Nc
Zip Code 28412
Email Lobrun@hotmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment 3 singal family homes provides the proper green space .
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 12
1
Doss, Amy
From:Robert Chaimowitz <robertchaimowitz@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, December 26, 2025 3:37 PM
To:Doss, Amy
Subject:Red Lighthouse Ln.
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Dear Ms Doss:
My name is Robert Chaimowitz. I am the first house on the right ( 821 ) on Red lighthouse ln. I have lived
here for over 26 years. I purchased this house in 1999 new. I moved here from carolina beach to get away
from the traffic and noise. I am a 100% disabled Vietnam Vet. I cannot attend the meeting on the 1/8/26
due to health issues. This is a private road. We just had it resurfaced this past summer. I want it to stay a
private road. I do not want to here traffic going in and out 25 feet away from my house. It's a very narrow
road and right across from their proposed drive way is a fire hydrant. My two neighbors across the street
are fire fighters and I do not think they would appreciate a drive way right there. They should use Little
pony rd for a drive way. I am totally against this rezoning request.( Z25-18- Beacon Townhomes)
Thank you for your time
Robert Chaimowitz 821 Red lighthouse ln
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 13
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Thursday, December 25, 2025 8:01 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29260 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Linda
Last Name Magness
Address 7105 Ontario rd
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Lmagness68@aol.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment We have too many apt buildings as is. This will cause even
more chaos in traffic we don’t need
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 14
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Wednesday, December 24, 2025 2:26 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29255 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Susan
Last Name Oslun
Address 7862 Champlain
City Wilmington
State Nc
Zip Code 28412
Email Moslun@aol.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment No more apts on carolina beach rd.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 15
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Wednesday, December 24, 2025 9:58 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29252 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Natalia
Last Name Dokus
Address 7641 Champlain dr
City Wilmington
State Nc
Zip Code 28412
Email nataliamdokus@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment Stop squizing in pseudo luxury apartments in the area. You are
ruining it and infrastructure is not fit for it.
We already have over 700 apt/townhomes coming in the next 2
years just past our neighborhood.
You want to help the area build affordable daycare.
Upload supporting files
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 16
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Wednesday, December 24, 2025 9:07 AM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29251 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Jess
Last Name Anderson
Address 6918 Ontario rd
City Wilmington
State Nc
Zip Code 28412
Email Anderwild15@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose this project in this location.
The current property zoning of R15 fits the land and the area
surrounding. Carolina Beach rd currently has 3 very high
density projects of more than 700 apt/townhomes in this same
area. The traffic is going to be horrendous.
Emergency evacuation plan does not even exist for what we
have now. We have both River rd as well as Carolina Beach rd
with more than 10 current apartment projects in the works with
more than 3,0000 apartments being built. This does not even
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 17
2
include the River Lights neighborhood with thousands of
homes being built. Our town can not handle any more high
density projects.
Our schools are over capacity with the average classroom size
sitting over 32 students per teacher. The fire marshal increases
capacity each year with no extension to the school buildings
only an increase In students.
There was suppose to be another school built in River Lights,
but that project has been eliminated and our students have no
where to go for a decent education without overcrowded
classrooms.
Please do not approve this project.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 18
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 23, 2025 10:38 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29250 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Christopher
Last Name Wood
Address 3636 Echo Farms Blvd
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Christopher.n.wood@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 19
2
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 20
3
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
---
Conclusion
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 21
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 6:12 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29313 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Stephen
Last Name Cesare
Address 8102 Saint Barts Ct
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Field not completed.
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 22
2
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 23
3
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
---
Conclusion
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 24
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 6:22 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29314 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Mark
Last Name Shell
Address 619 Catamaran Drive
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Field not completed.
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 25
2
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:
• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 26
3
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
Conclusion
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 27
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 6:36 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29315 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Carol
Last Name Hopps
Address 557 Catamaran Drive
City Wilmington
State North Carolina
Zip Code 28412
Email Carolhopps@yahoo.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 28
2
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 29
3
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
---
Conclusion
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 30
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 6:41 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29316 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Mona
Last Name El-Khatib Martinez
Address 613 Saint Vincent Drive
City Wilmington
State North Carolina
Zip Code 28412
Email monita1172@gmail.com
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment To whom it may concern:
I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 31
2
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 32
3
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
Conclusion:
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 33
1
Doss, Amy
From:noreply@civicplus.com
Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2025 7:04 PM
To:May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Doss, Amy; Dickerson,
Zachary; Beil, Ryan; Watson, McCabe
Subject:Online Form Submission #29317 for Public Comment Form
** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe **
Public Comment Form
The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning
Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of
the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and
will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting.
First Name Annelien
Last Name Williamson
Address 8126 Bahia Honda Drive
City Wilmington
State NC
Zip Code 28412
Email Field not completed.
Please select the case
for comment.
PB Meeting - Z25-18 – Beacon Townhomes
What is the nature of
your comment?
Oppose project
Public Comment I respectfully oppose the request to rezone 7244 Carolina
Beach Road and 825 Red Lighthouse Lane from R-15
Residential to (CZD) R-5 Residential Moderate-High Density
for the construction of up to nine attached dwelling units. While
thoughtful growth is important, the existing infrastructure in the
Monkey Junction area is already strained and does not support
additional density at this location.
1. Transportation Infrastructure Is Already Over Capacity
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 34
2
• Carolina Beach Road (US-421) is one of the most congested
corridors in New Hanover County, especially between Monkey
Junction and the southern beaches.
• Traffic backups at Piner Road, Sanders Road, and Myrtle
Grove Road are routine, even outside peak hours.
• This corridor has limited turn lanes, long signal cycles, and no
realistic opportunity for widening without major right-of-way
impacts.
• Adding multi-unit density on a parcel that feeds directly into
this corridor will worsen delays and increase crash risk in an
area already identified as a safety concern.
2. Road Network Inside the Neighborhood Cannot Absorb
Higher Density
• Red Lighthouse Lane and the surrounding residential streets
were built for low-density R-15 traffic volumes, not for multi-unit
attached housing.
• These roads lack:• Adequate width for increased traffic
• Sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement
• Street lighting and shoulders
• Increasing density without upgrading these roads creates
unsafe conditions for existing residents, school buses, and
emergency vehicles.
3. Stormwater Infrastructure Is Insufficient for Higher-Density
Development
• Monkey Junction is known for poor drainage and frequent
localized flooding, especially during heavy rain events.
• The existing stormwater system was designed for
single-family R-15 runoff, not the impervious surface load
created by duplexes, triplexes, and quadraplexes.
• Without major upgrades, additional impervious surface will
worsen:• Street flooding
• Yard and property flooding
• Downstream impacts on nearby waterways and wetlands
4. Public Services Are Already Stretched
• Schools in the area are operating near or at capacity, and this
development adds more units without contributing to school
infrastructure.
• Fire and EMS response times in the Monkey Junction area
are already challenged by traffic congestion and limited access
points.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 35
3
• Higher density increases demand on these services without
providing the infrastructure improvements needed to support
them.
5. The Rezoning Is Inconsistent With the Surrounding Area
• The surrounding neighborhoods are predominantly R-15
single-family, and this request introduces a density level that is
incompatible with the established development pattern.
• Spot-zoning higher density into a low-density area sets a
precedent that could encourage further piecemeal up-zoning
without coordinated infrastructure planning.
---
Conclusion
Until the transportation network, stormwater systems, and
public services in Monkey Junction are upgraded to support
higher density, this rezoning is premature. Approving R-5
density at this location would place additional strain on
infrastructure that is already overburdened and would
negatively impact the safety, mobility, and quality of life for
existing residents.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the rezoning
application be denied.
Upload supporting files
If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload text and photo
files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc,
docx, ppt, pptx, txt, rtf, odf, csv, xls, xlsx, pdf, jpg, png and static gif.
File 1 Field not completed.
File 2 Field not completed.
File 3 Field not completed.
File 4 Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 2 - 11 - 36
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/8/2026
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director, Kaa Boykin, Community
Planning Supervisor
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Comprehensive Plan Update - Request by New Hanover County to adopt the NHC Desnaon
2050 Comprehensive Plan update.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
NHC Desnaon 2050 is an update to New Hanover County's Comprehensive Plan, originally adopted in 2016. The
plan provides a long-range framework to guide land use decisions, public investments, infrastructure planning, and
environmental stewardship through the year 2050.
For over a year, staff have worked with residents, community partners, advisory boards, elected officials, and county
departments to idenfied shared priories and challenges for the county's future. Building on the 2016
Comprehensive Plan and the FY2024-2028 New Hanover County Strategic Plan, Desnaon 2050 reflects a
coordinated, countywide effort to respond to connued growth, increasing urbanizaon, infrastructure limitaons, and
environmental risks, while protecng the county's natural assets that support community character, public health, and
long-term resilience.
On October 20, 2025, the Board of Commissioners approved the direcon for the remaining components of the plan,
including future land use recommendaons, goals, objecves, and policies. This acon allowed staff to prepare a full
dra: for public review as part of the formal adopon process.
The dra: NHC Desnaon 2050 plan was released for public review on November 19, 2025, and was available online
and at mulple public facilies. The public comment period closed on December 19, 2025. During that four-week
period, staff received 32 public comments submi=ed through the project website, by email, and at a library locaon.
In response, staff made targeted revisions to clarify language and correct factual informaon, while avoiding changes
to policy direcon previously endorsed by the Board of Commissioners. Individual public comments are included
separately in the agenda packet to inform the Board's final decision. A summary of comments and staff responses are
also provided.
A copy of the updated plan dra: (without appendix) is included in the agenda packet, and the full plan with appendix
can be found here.
A:er the Planning Board's recommendaon, the final adopon public hearing will take place at the February 2, 2026
Board of Commissioners meeng.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff is requesng the Planning Board recommend approval of NHC Desnaon 2050. A suggested moon of
approval is provided in the a=ached script.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descripon
Destination 2050 - Script
NHC Destination 2050 - Public Hearing Draft (without Appendix)
Destination 2050 - Public Comment Responses
Destination 2050 - Public Comments
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3
SCRIPT for Comprehensive Plan Adoption
Request by New Hanover County to adopt the NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan update.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then any supporters and
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes
for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponents’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Staff rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponents’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board Discussion (including questions for staff)
5. Vote on amendment. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not,
consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed update to the New Hanover County
Comprehensive Plan. I find it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive
Plan as it builds on the foundation of that plan in supporting connected growth, respecting established
communities, targeting new development where land is available, protecting environmentally sensitive
areas, and mitigating risk to flooding and other natural hazards. I find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
to be reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed plan is based on community input and
technical data and is aligned with prior Board of Commissioners policy direction.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to recommend [Approval/Denial] of the proposed amendment to the New Hanover County Unified
Development Ordinance. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
I also find [Approval/Denial] of the proposed amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because
[insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 1
This page has been left intentionally blank
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 2
Introduction
NHC Destination 2050 New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan
New Hanover County is a vibrant, growing coastal community that values its natural beauty, economic opportunity,
and distinctive sense of place. NHC Destination 2050 sets forth a long-range framework for navigating change in a
way that reflects community values while preparing for the challenges and opportunities ahead.
In 2016, New Hanover County adopted its first comprehensive plan, Plan NHC: Charting the Course. Since then, our
community has continued to grow, new challenges have emerged, and major investments have been made to put
the plan’s vision into action. These include reorganizing and modernizing the county’s development regulations into
a Unified Development Ordinance, extending water and sewer trunk lines to serve the “Last Frontier” of
undeveloped land in the northeastern part of the county, and creating a stormwater services program to address
drainage concerns tied to historic development patterns.
With much of that work completed, the county also recognizes that planning is not a one-time exercise. As our
community evolves, we must continually adapt in order to meet future needs. The Board of Commissioners began
to set the direction for this work when they approved a new Strategic Plan in July 2023 with a focus area that
includes Sustainable Land Use and Environmental Stewardship.
For those reasons, in 2024 the county began a full update to the comprehensive plan – NHC Destination 2050. Over
the past year and a half, staff have gathered input and data to better understand community values and priorities
for the next 25 years. Building on the foundation established by the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the FY 2024-
2028 New Hanover County Strategic Plan, NHC Destination 2050 represents the collective work of residents,
community partners, elected and appointed officials, and county staff. Together, they have shaped a framework
that will guide how the county grows, invests, and protects what matters most.
As the county continues to become more urban, it must contend with limited developable land, constraints on
infrastructure, and increasing environmental pressures. These challenges are real, complex, and often difficult to
solve. At the same time, the county’s natural assets, its wetlands, waterways, tree canopy, and open spaces, are
essential to public health, community identity, and long-term resilience. NHC Destination 2050 acknowledges that
balancing growth with environmental stewardship will not be easy, but it is necessary to sustain the quality of life
residents value.
The plan introduces policies for the unincorporated areas of the county that will support connected growth, respect
established communities, and targets new development where land is available. It pairs these growth strategies
with approaches to protect environmentally sensitive areas, reduce flood risk, and improve the performance of
critical ecosystem features. This integrated approach positions the county to make informed decisions that support
i
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 3
economic vitality while managing the environmental realities of a coastal community. While NHC Destination 2050 is
primarily a policy document that does not change the zoning that applies to property, recommendations included in
this document impact future decisions on land use and can affect how land may be used or developed in the future.
For instance, as one of North Carolina’s twenty coastal counties, New Hanover County is also required by the
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) to prepare a local land use plan reviewed by the NC Department of
Environmental Quality and the Coastal Resources Commission. NHC Destination 2050 fulfills this role and is
intended to serve as the official CAMA plan for the unincorporated county. Its structure aligns state requirements
with the county’s long-term vision by presenting a coordinated set of goals, objectives, policies, and implementation
actions, supported by an action plan that connects daily decisions with long-term outcomes.
Through NHC Destination 2050, New Hanover County commits to a thoughtful, realistic approach to managing
growth—one that recognizes environmental constraints, supports economic opportunity, and prepares the
community for a future shaped by both progress and change.
ii
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 4
Acknowledgements
Since the project’s inception in 2024, the creation of this plan would not have been possible without the leadership
of the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners, Planning Board, and the Technical Advisory Committee.
Together, we have shaped a roadmap for a thriving and resilient future for New Hanover County.
Board of Commissioners
LeAnn Pierce (Chair)
Dane Scalise (Vice Chair)
Bill Rivenbark
Stephanie Walker
Rob Zapple
Planning Board
Cameron Moore (Chair)
Walter “Pete” Avery (Vice-Chair)
Andy Hewitt
Kevin Hine
Clark Hipp
Shemeka Kemp
Kaitlyn Rhonehouse
Chris Coudriet, County Manager
Kym Crowell, NHC Clerk
Jordan K. Smith, NHC Attorney
Jessica Loeper, Assistant County Manager
Lisa Wurtzbacher, Assistant County Manager
Tufanna Bradley, Chief Health & Human
Services Officer (Former)
Tim Buckland, Intergovernmental Affairs
Executive Leadership Team
Eric Credle, Chief Financial Officer
Sunny Hwang, Chief Information Officer
Jennifer Rigby, Chief Strategy Officer
Josh Smith, Chief Communications Officer
Linda Thompson, Chief Civic Engagement Officer
Sara Warmuth, Chief Facilities Officer
Crystal Whittaker, Executive Aide
Former County Commissioners
• Jonathan Barfield, Jr.
Former Planning Board Members
• Hansen Matthews
• Jeff Petroff
• Colin Tarrant
iii
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 5
Acknowledgements
Technical Advisory Committee
NHC Civic Engagement
• Linda Thompson
NHC Communications
• Josh Smith
NHC Emergency Management
• Steven Still
NHC Engineering
• Galen Jamison
• Timothy Lowe
NHC Fire Rescue
• Donnie Hall
• David Stone
NHC Health & Human Services
• Melissa Lombardi
• Alicia Pickett
NHC Information Technology
• Mike Arkinson
NHC Management
• Tufanna Bradley
• Jessica Loeper
• Lisa Wurtzbacher
NHC Parks and Gardens
• Tara Duckworth
• Andy Johnson
NHC Planning Board
• Jeff Petroff
• Colin Tarrant
NHC Schools
• Eddie Anderson
• Rob Morgan
NHC Senior Resource Center
• Amber Smith
NHC Soil & Water Conservation District
• Dru Harrison
NHC Strategy
• Jennifer Rigby
NHC Sustainability
• Madelyn Wampler
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
• Gary McSmith
• Eric Seidel
• Jeff Theberge
• Kenneth Waldroup
Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization
• Mike Kozlosky
• Abigail Lorenzo
City of Wilmington Planning
• Travis Henley
• Linda Painter
Pender County Planning
• Daniel Adams
• Justin Brantley
• Virginia Norris
• Marcy Waters
Brunswick County Planning
• Helen Bunch
iv
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 6
Acknowledgements
Planning & Land Use Department Staff
Ken Vafier, Planning Operations Supervisor
Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
Lisa Maes, Administrative Supervisor
Ryan Beil, Development Review Planner
Christine Bouffard, Zoning Team Lead
Shauna Bradley, Administrative Specialist
Zachary Dickerson, Senior Planner Development Review
Amy Doss, Development Review Planner
Bruce Gould, Zoning Compliance Official
Katherine May, Development Review Planner
Theo McClammy, Program Manager
Melissa Ridgeway, Planning & Land Use Technician - Zoning
McCabe Watson, Planning Coordinator
Comprehensive Plan Primary Project Team
Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director
Katia Boykin, Planning & Land Use Supervisor
Karlene Ellis-Vitalis, Associate Planner – Long Range
Dylan McDonnell, Associate Planner – Long Range
Virginia Norris, Associate Planner – Long Range (Former)
v
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 7
This page has been left intentionally blank
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 8
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... i
Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii
Chapter 1: Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3
Population & Demographics ............................................................................................................................. 4
Land & Development ...................................................................................................................................... 12
Residential Development & Housing Units ................................................................................................... 17
Transportation ................................................................................................................................................. 21
Economy ........................................................................................................................................................... 33
Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................... 40
New Hanover County Community Services .................................................................................................. 43
Education.......................................................................................................................................................... 55
Environment & Natural Resources ................................................................................................................. 57
Historical and Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 75
Chapter 2: Public Engagement ................................................................................................................... 77
Public Engagement Process ............................................................................................................................ 79
Key Findings from Public Engagement .......................................................................................................... 83
Outcomes ......................................................................................................................................................... 84
Chapter 3: Framing the Policy .................................................................................................................... 85
What We Heard ................................................................................................................................................ 87
What We Learned ............................................................................................................................................ 89
From Evidence to Policy Direction .................................................................................................................. 90
Chapter 4: Visualizing the Future ............................................................................................................... 93
Future Land Use Map ...................................................................................................................................... 95
Place Type Descriptions .................................................................................................................................. 98
Future Land Use Map: Natural Systems ...................................................................................................... 107
Additional Planning Considerations ............................................................................................................. 117
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 9
Chapter 5: Building the Future ................................................................................................................. 135
Translating Goals into Action ........................................................................................................................ 137
Implementation Strategies ........................................................................................................................... 145
Action Plan ..................................................................................................................................................... 157
Measures ........................................................................................................................................................ 169
Appendix ...........................................................................................................................................................
CAMA Land Use Planning Reference Guide ......................................................................................................
Technical Studies & Reports ...............................................................................................................................
Market Analysis ..............................................................................................................................
Housing Needs Assessment ...........................................................................................................
Stormwater Report ........................................................................................................................
Tree Canopy Assessment ...............................................................................................................
Floodplain Program Technical Report ............................................................................................
Resident Survey .............................................................................................................................
Reference Documents .........................................................................................................................................
Figure References ..........................................................................................................................
Map References .............................................................................................................................
New Hanover County Zoning Districts ...........................................................................................
Plan References .............................................................................................................................
Surface Water Classifications .........................................................................................................
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 10
Chapter 1: Existing Conditions
New Hanover County’s Comprehensive Plan begins with an assessment of existing conditions to better understand
the current state of the community. Our staff analyzed and evaluated what is already in place including land use,
infrastructure, demographics, housing, transportation, and environmental factors before determining future goals
or changes. This analysis provides a critical foundation for creating a comprehensive and actionable plan that
addresses both present realities while preparing for future needs.
Why This Matters:
Establish a clear baseline.
Understanding current conditions provides a
starting point to identify opportunities, gaps,
needs, and challenges – knowing the present helps
plan for the future.
Support evidence-based decisions.
Reliable data enables county leaders to make
informed choices, ensuring the comprehensive
plan is realistic, practical, and aligned with
community needs and resources.
Set targeted goals and investments.
Analysis highlights where services or amenities are
lacking (for example, limited walkable access to
parks) so the plan can direct improvements where
they will have the greatest impact.
Anticipate and manage growth.
Trends in population and land use help forecast
change and guide timely, right-sized infrastructure
and land-use strategies.
1
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 11
This page has been left intentionally blank
2
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 12
Existing Conditions Introduction
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Introduction
New Hanover County is located in southeastern North Carolina along the Atlantic coast and serves as a regional
center for commerce, tourism, and coastal living. This Comprehensive Plan outlines recommendations for future
land use and development in the unincorporated areas outside the City of Wilmington and beach towns but
presents data and analysis at multiple geographic scales to reflect the county’s diverse communities and
interconnected development patterns. Information is provided for New Hanover County as a whole (referred to as
“the county”), as well as for the City of Wilmington, the beach municipalities of Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and
Wrightsville Beach, and the unincorporated areas of the county when that data is available. The data included
throughout this report highlights key demographic, economic,
environmental, and land-use conditions that provide context for
understanding current trends and
future challenges. This information
was compiled through the spring
of 2025 and reflects what has been
used to inform recommendations,
guide policy direction, and shape
the plan’s goals, objectives, and
implementation actions. While the
plan draws upon the best available
and most relevant data, it does not
include every data source or
metric that exists. The information
presented is primarily derived
from publicly available sources,
including the U.S. Census Bureau,
the North Carolina Office of State
Budget and Management (State
Demographer), and New Hanover
County datasets, and is intended
to support informed, transparent,
and forward-looking decision-
making. Full size maps and a list of
data sources are located in the
appendix section of this plan.
Map 1.1 Map of New Hanover County
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
3
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 13
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Population & Demographics
Historical Population
As the first baseline measure –
population is an important starting
point to understand the current
and future needs of the
community. New Hanover County's
total population has grown steadily
over the past decades. As shown
on Figure 1.1, the county has
increased every decade since 1940.
Current population as of 2023 is
231,214.
Population Projections
Looking ahead (Figure 1.2), New Hanover County as a whole is expected to continue to grow. This is important as
these projections can help plan for increased transportation, infrastructure, and community service needs. By 2050
the population is projected to reach 333,488. This represents an increase of more than 107,000 people, or
approximately 48% over 30 years.
47
,
9
3
5
63
,
2
7
2
71
,
7
4
2
82
,
9
9
6
10
3
,
4
7
1
12
0
,
2
8
4
16
0
,
3
0
7
20
2
,
6
6
7
22
5
,
7
0
2
23
1
,
2
1
4
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
Figure 1.1 Historical Population for New Hanover County
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 2020 & American Community
Survey 5-year estimates 2023
226,927
246,073
262,570
279,084
295,596
312,111
328,626
200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Figure 1.2 New Hanover County Population Projections
Source: N.C. Office of State Budget and Management Vintage 2023
4
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 14
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Population by Jurisdiction
New Hanover County is made up of five
jurisdictions - the unincorporated county, the City
of Wilmington, and the beach towns - Kure Beach,
Carolina Beach, and Wrightsville Beach. The
unincorporated county, City of Wilmington and
beach towns collectively have all experienced
population growth as seen in Figure 1.3.
Population shifts between the City of Wilmington
and the Unincorporated areas of the county have
fluctuated over time, primarily due to annexations of
unincorporated land into the Wilmington city limits.
Figure 1.5 shows the population distribution over
time as a percentage for each jurisdiction.
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
New Hanover 47,935 63,272 71,742 82,996 103,471 120,284 160,307 202,667 225,702 231,214
Wilmington 33,407 45,043 44,013 46,169 44,000 55,283 75,838 106,476 115,451 118,578
Unincorporated 25,521 33,069 53,976 57,815 75,668 85,996 99,023 100,969
Beach Towns 2,208 3,758 5,495 7,186 8,801 10,195 11,228 11,667
Figure 1.4 Population Distribution by Jurisdiction
Source: U.S. U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 2020 &
American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
Figure 1.3 Population Distribution by Jurisdiction
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 2020 & American
Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
New Hanover County
Wilmington
Unincorporated
Beach Towns
43%46%47%53%51%51%
52%48%47%42%44%44%
5%6%6%5%5%5%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
Wilmington Unincorporated Beach Towns Figure 1.5 Population Percentage by Jurisdiction
U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 2020 & American Community
Survey 5-year estimates 2023
5
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 15
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Regional Population
Understanding regional population trends is
essential because people live, work and travel
across county lines. Changes in one county can
have an effect on housing, jobs, and traffic
patterns – making coordination between counties
essential. The tri-county region including
Brunswick, New Hanover and Pender are growing
as a whole, as Brunswick and Pender are also
seeing increases in population.
From 1980 to 2023, New Hanover County
consistently had the largest population in the
region; however, Brunswick County experienced
the most dramatic relative growth, rising from
under 40,000 to over 140,000 during the same
period. Pender County has more than tripled its
population growing from about 20,000 in 1980 to
just over 60,000 in 2023 (Figure 1.6). When
looking at regional populations together, these
growth patterns show that growth pressures are
regional—not confined to one county—and will
require coordinated planning efforts across
county lines to plan for the increased population
and the changing needs of the region.
New Hanover Brunswick Pender
1980-1990 16.2% 42.5% 29.6%
1990 -2000 33.3% 43.5% 42.4%
2000-2010 26.4% 46.9% 27.1%
2010-2020 11.4% 27.2% 15.3%
2020-2023 2.4% 6.7% 5.4%
Figure 1.7 Tri-County Population Growth
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 1980-2020 & American Community
Survey 5-year estimates 2023
103,471
160,307
225,702
231,214
35,777
73,143
136,693
145,889
22,262 41,082 60,203 63,475
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
New Hanover Brunswick Pender
Figure 1.6 Tri-County Population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 1980-2020 &
American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
Map 1.2 Tri County Region of
Brunswick, New Hanover and Pender
6
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 16
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
To help inform future needs, an analysis of future population growth was considered in addition to current data
and existing Trends. The North Carolina state demographer’s population projections for the tri-county area show
ongoing growth. Looking ahead to 2050, while New Hanover County is projected to increase in population, so are
Brunswick and Pender. These counties are expected to narrow their gap with New Hanover as they have been
growing and project to grow at a faster rate. Brunswick County’s population is projected to increase most
substantially, from 150,000 residents in 2022 to just over 250,000 by 20250. Pender County is projected to increase
more modestly, from just over 60,000 in 2022 to nearly 100,000 during the same time frame (Figure 1.8). Together,
these projections reflect sustained regional growth driven by the appeal of coastal North Carolina as it attracts
growing families, retirees, and businesses.
247,230 259,215 271,202 283,188 295,175 307,162 319,147
173,455 190,301 205,070 219,091 232,844 246,500 260,121
70,797 74,886 78,977 83,067 87,156 91,247 95,336
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050
New Hanover Brunswick Pender
Figure 1.8 Tri County Population Projections
Source: N.C. Office of State Budget and Management Vintage 2023
7
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 17
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Source of Population
The U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey
(ACS) tracks migration flows. The most recent ACS State-
to-County Migration Flows (2018-2022) report shows
most of New Hanover County’s growth came from
people moving here from other parts of the United
States (81%). Births minus deaths added 13%, and
people moving from other countries accounted for 6%.
In short, growth was driven mainly by domestic
movers—not by births or international arrivals. (Figure
1.9).
The largest segment of population growth was by
domestic in-migration (Figure 1.10), a key takeaway from
Figure 1.10. Natural change (births minus deaths)
steadily declined, came to a standstill in 2020, and turned negative in 2021 and 2022, meaning deaths outnumbered
births. Despite this, the county’s population continued to grow.
Top 15 places people are moving from:
Connecticut Maryland Pennsylvania
Delaware Massachusetts South Carolina
Europe New Hampshire Tennessee
Georgia New Jersey Texas
Kansas New York Virginia
13%
6%
81%
Natural
International
Domestic In-
Migration
Figure 1.9 Source of Population Growth
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year
estimates 2018-2022
-500
250
1000
1750
2500
3250
4000
4750
5500
6250
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Natural
International
Domestic In-
Migration
Figure 1.10
Source of
Population
Change
Source: U.S.
Census Bureau
American
Community
Survey 5-year
estimates 2018-
2022
8
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 18
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Racial Composition
Over the 30-year period from 1990 to
2020 the percentage of White
residents in New Hanover County as a
whole has declined from 78.9% in
1990 to 75.7% in 2020. Likewise, the
African American population also
decreased proportionally, from 20.0%
in 1990 to 12.1% in 2020. In contrast,
the Hispanic population grew
significantly from just 0.8% in 1990 to
7.7% in 2020, making it the fastest-
growing demographic group in the
region. Other racial categories,
including Asian and Pacific Islander,
American Indian and Alaska Native,
and multiracial individuals ("Other
Races"), also saw modest increases, particularly between 2010
and 2020 (Figure 1.11). Overall, the data shows a clear trend
toward increasing racial and ethnic diversity, with the Hispanic
and multiracial populations growing while the White and African
American population percentages decline, as seen in Figure 1.12
showing the difference between 2000 and 2023.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1990 2000 2010 2020 2023
Hispanic (of any race)
Other Races
Asian and Pacific Islander
American Indian and Alaska
Native
Black or African-American
White
Figure 1.11 Population Distribution by Race
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 1990-2020 &
American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
Figure 1.12 Racial Composition
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census 2000 & American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
72.7%
12.0%
6.7%
5.4%
2.0%1.2%2023White
Black or African
American
Hispanic or Latino (of
any race)
Other Race
Asian & Pacific
Islander
American Indian &
Alaska Native
79.9%
17.0%
2.0%
0.8%0.9%
0.4%2000
9
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 19
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Figure 1.15 Population by
Age Generation Source: U.S. Census Bureau
American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
Population by Age
Between 2000 and 2020, the most notable demographic trend is the
aging of the population. The 65+ age group grew significantly from
10% in 2000 to 21% in 2020, and the 45–64 group also increased
steadily, reaching 27% in 2020. In contrast, the 25-44 age group
declined from 32% in 2000 to just 21% in 2020, indicating a shrinking
share of working-age adults. The under-18 population slightly
declined from 25% in 2000 to 20% in 2020, while the 18–24 group
remained stable or slightly increased (Figure 1.13). These shifts
reflect an aging population in the unincorporated area, with a
growing proportion of older adults and a decline in the prime
working-age demographic. As New Hanover County’s population
of older adults grows, the county will need to expand existing
resources and adapt its services to ensure safe, healthy, and
equitable aging.
Another way to look at age composition
is from a generational perspective
(Figure 1.15). Since the county’s last
comprehensive plan in 2016, a new
generational group has been included
by the Library of Congress, Generation
Alpha which includes individuals who
are 11 years old or younger (2013-
present).
2023
Silent Generation 1925-1945 (79-99) 17,107 7%
Baby Boomer 1946-1964 (60-78) 41,324 18%
Generation X 1965-1980 (44-59) 43,349 19%
Millennial 1981-1996 (28-43) 59,346 26%
Generation Z 1997-2012 (12–27) 48,183 21%
Generation Alpha 2013–present
(11 and younger) 21,905 9%
Figure 1.13 Population by Age Group
N.C. Office of State Budget and Management Vintage 2023
18%
12%
26%25%
20%<18
18-24
25-44
45-64
65+
- 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000
<18
18-24
25-44
45-64
65+
2000
2010
2020
2023
Figure 1.14 Population Over Time by
Age Group
Source: N.C. Office of State Budget and
Management Vintage 2023
10
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 20
Population & Demographics
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Population by Gender
The 2020 population pyramid for New
Hanover County shows a stable, balanced
demographic with a uniform distribution
across age groups, reflecting a growth rate
that replaces the death rate. The most
notable features are the size of the 20–24
age group, largely due to individuals in
higher education at the University of North
Carolina Wilmington (UNCW) and Cape
Fear Community College (CFCC) and that
women outnumber men in older age
brackets. This indicates a mature
population with a strong working-age
presence and a visible concentration of
young adults (Figure 1.16).
By 2050, the pyramid becomes wider or
more constrictive for age ranges in the
middle, which reflects an aging population
with low or falling birth rates. A bulge in
the pyramid for the 20–24 age range is
consistent with the growing population of
UNCW and CFCC. While women still
outnumber men in the oldest cohorts;
overall, the shift points to a stable but
older population, with future impacts on
healthcare, housing, and workforce
planning in New Hanover County
Overall, the population is projected to be
split almost evenly between both male and
female.
Figure 1.16 Population Pyramid 2020
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2020 Decennial
C
10%5%0%5%10%
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+Female %
Male %
10%5%0%5%10%
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+Female %
Male %
Figure 1.17 Population Pyramid 2050
Source: N.C. Office of State Budget and Management Vintage 2023
11
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 21
Land & Development
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Land & Development
Over time, unincorporated
New Hanover County has
transitioned from
predominantly rural, low-
intensity uses to a landscape
of established neighborhoods,
mixed housing types, and
commercial corridors.
Growth patterns have been
influenced by the interplay of
market demand, the
availability of utilities, local
investments and economic
development initiatives,
environmental regulations,
and long range planning tools
such as historic CAMA plans,
the 2016 Comprehensive Plan,
zoning designations,
development standards, and
local stormwater water
quantity standards.
Land Classifications
To understand how the
county is developing, two
complementary datasets are
used: land cover and land use.
Together, this information
helps visualize where
development has occurred
and highlight areas where
future growth is most likely to
occur.
Land cover describes what is physically on the ground, such as tree canopy, water, grass, or developed surfaces,
and helps illustrate the extent of natural versus built environments based on information provided by the U.S.
Geological Survey.
Map 1.3 Land Cover Classifications
Source: National Land Cover Database 2024
12
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 22
Land & Development
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Land use, on the other hand, uses
local tax data to illustrate how land
is being used, whether for
residential, commercial, industrial,
forestry, or other purposes. This
information focuses more on the
built environment and status of a
property on a parcel-by-parcel
basis.
The largest percentage of
developed land is used for
residential purposes in
unincorporated New Hanover
County, with Services (commercial
businesses as well some
educational and recreational
services) a distant second.
Both land classification and land
use data can be used to illustrate
the spatial distribution of land that
is currently developed and land
that is not, which can support
initiatives related to greenspace
planning and efforts to identify
where future growth should be
anticipated.
48%
15%
24%
2%11%
Residential
Manufacturing
Services
Trade
Transportation, Communications, Utilities
Figure 1.18 Developed Land Use
Source NHC Tax Department 2024
Map 1.4 Land Use Classification
Source: NHC Tax Department & Planning & Land Use 2025
13
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 23
Land & Development
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Undeveloped Land
From high resolution land classification data (2022),
approximately 86% of the land in unincorporated
New Hanover County is undeveloped. The
remaining 14% of land that is considered developed
accommodates residential uses, commercial
operations, and industrial structures, as well as
paved surfaces such as a road or parking lot. A
significant portion of this undeveloped land consists
of larger parcels, whereas the undeveloped land
located south of the City of Wilmington is
predominantly contained within smaller parcels.
While approximately 25,000 acres are classified as
undeveloped, there are differences in the potential
use of this land. Some properties are likely to
develop over time, but many remaining
undeveloped areas face significant development
constraints. Additionally, some may be used for
agriculture or forestry, and others may be retained
for permanent open space.
Differentiating between undeveloped land, areas
with redevelopment potential, and conservation or
required open space provides a more realistic
understanding of where future growth is likely to occur in
New Hanover County. These three categories serve different
roles in shaping long-term development patterns.
• Undeveloped/Vacant includes parcels with little to no existing development. The feasibility and timing of
future development varies widely based on access to utilities, infrastructure capacity, environmental
constraints, and parcel size. These areas are also expected to include a percentage of required open space
even if developed.
• Redevelopment/Infill Potential identifies locations where existing development could be reused or intensified
over time, such as aging commercial sites or underutilized parcels. The cost of retrofits, regulatory
requirements, and existing leases may impact when and where redevelopment is most likely to occur in the
near term. Infill should consider existing communities and the character of current development.
• Conservation and Required Open Space represents lands protected for natural resources, parks, stormwater
management, or development-required open space. These areas are not available for new development,
though recreational amenities may be allowed, and can play a role in countywide environmental resilience.
They also form the foundation for future green corridors that can connect habitats, enhance, recreation, and
enforce community character.
Map 1.5 Land Cover: Developed & Undeveloped
Source: New Hanover County Land Classification 2022 – Urban
Tree Canopy Assessment 2022
14
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 24
Land & Development
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
With about 2,000 acres of land in a
conservation status in the unincorporated
county, this information (as shown on Map
1.6). helps guide county decisions about
where and how growth should occur by;
Focusing Growth Where Most Feasible:
Clusters of undeveloped land in the
northern part of the county represent the
most practical areas for new master
planned developments, provided
infrastructure, access, and environmental
constraints are addressed.
Encouraging Context-Sensitive Infill:
Strategically located infill sites offer
opportunities to provide additional housing
and services within existing communities,
though it would be important to set
expectations for how new infill development
could complement the surrounding
character and be compatible with existing
neighborhoods.
Developing a Green Framework:
Conservation lands and required open
space not only help protect sensitive natural
areas but help shape a future network of
green corridors that can support water
quality, habitat continuity, recreation, and
overall community resilience.
Aligning Investments in Infrastructure and Services: Identifying where land is most likely to develop in the future
helps guide local decisions about infrastructure, facility, and service investments.
Improving Policy and Regulatory Tools: The pattern of undeveloped land, conservation areas, and parcels with
development or redevelopment potential provides direction for refining the Future Land Use Map, updating zoning
districts, calibrating infill standards, and advancing conservation strategies.
This analysis helps clarify where growth can go, where it should be encouraged first, and where it
should not go, enabling fiscally responsible, resilient, and community-supported planning.
Map 1.6 Parcel Based Land Development Status
Source: NHC Tax Department, Planning & Land Use 2024
Map 1.6 Parcel Based Land Development Status
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
15
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 25
Residential Development & Housing Units
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Zoning
The State of North Carolina authorizes
local jurisdictions, including cities and
counties, to adopt and enforce zoning
regulations that promote public health,
safety, and general welfare. New
Hanover County adopted its first
zoning ordinance in 1969, establishing
nine districts. As development patterns
have evolved, the county’s zoning
framework has expanded to 25
districts organized into residential,
commercial and industrial, and mixed-
use categories.
Each zoning district outlines permitted
uses and standards such as minimum
lot size, allowable residential density,
and setback requirements. These
regulations, along with all other
development standards and
guidelines, are contained within the
New Hanover County Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO).
Approximately 85% of the zoned land
in unincorporated New Hanover
County is designated for residential
use. Within this category, the R-15
zoning district accounts for nearly 37%
of residential land, while the remaining residential districts collectively represent about 25% of the county’s total
zoned area. The second-largest zoning category is I-2 (Heavy Industrial), which comprises roughly 24% of zoned
land, primarily concentrated in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the county along the Northeast Cape
Fear River. A description of New Hanover County’s zoning districts can be found in the appendix section of this plan.
R-15, Residential I-2, Heavy Industrial R-20, Residential RA, Rural Agriculture R-10, Residential
36.83% 23.86% 11.75% 8.79% 4.08%
Figure 1.19 NHC Five Largest Zoning Districts
Source NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
Map 1.7 NHC Zoning Districts
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
16
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 26
Residential Development & Housing Units
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Residential Development & Housing Units
Since 2020, the unincorporated areas of the county
have experienced an increase in new residential
construction, as reflected by the number of
housing units receiving Certificates of Occupancy
(CO). A CO is issued by the New Hanover County
Building Safety Department once a home or
housing unit has met all requirements of the
North Carolina State Building Code.
Across all jurisdictions (City of Wilmington, unincorporated area,
Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach and Kure beach), New
Hanover County’s housing units are primarily single family
detached (57%). Across the county as a whole, approximately
3,100 total units were permitted between 2019-2023
representing growth and the desire of people to live here.
Overall, over the past several years apartment and townhome
styles of housing units have seen an increase. Within the
unincorporated county, while there have been more permitted
apartment and townhome units, single family detached homes
still represent the largest percentage of housing type at 78%
(Figure 1.21).
NHC Housing Needs Assessment
Information in the sections below are from the New Hanover County Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) published
in April 2025. The Housing Needs Assessment includes demographic trends, changes in supply and demand for
housing and current and future gaps in housing. While the information below is similar to data found elsewhere in
this plan (like the U.S. Census Bureau and N.C. State Demographer), there maybe differences in information due to
when information was gathered for analysis and final reporting. The full assessment, which also contains a list of
data sources, can be found in the appendix section of this plan.
41,000
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
47,000
48,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Figure 1.20 Cumulative Total Housing Units
Unincorporated NHC
Source NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
Figure 1.21 Housing by Type
Unincorporated NHC
Source NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
9%7%
6%
78%
Apartments Single Family Attached
Manufatured Home Single Family Detached
17
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 27
Residential Development & Housing Units
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Housing Type by Tenure
83% of single family detached houses are owner occupied compared to 22% of which are renter occupied. In New
Hanover County renters are mostly occupying other types of housing units such as duplexes, apartment homes, or
townhomes.
• 16% of renters live in attached single family (duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes) compared to 2% of owners;
• 24% of renters live in units in small multifamily buildings (5-19 units) compared to 3% of owners;
• 25% of renters live in units in large multifamily buildings (20+ units) compared to 2% of owners; and
• 6% of renters live in mobile homes compared to 3% of owners.
Household Change
In 2023, New Hanover County had just over 100,000 households. By 2043, that number is projected to grow to
approximately 142,400 households, an increase of nearly 42% over 20 years. This growth rate is faster than the
projected increase in population (27%).
When household growth outpaces population growth, more homes than would otherwise be needed are required
to accommodate the same number of residents. This dynamic increases overall demand for housing and places
additional pressure on the existing housing supply. Smaller household sizes also influence the types of homes
residents may need. For example, demand could rise for one-bedroom or smaller multifamily units, townhomes,
and other housing types suited to singles, couples without children, and aging adults.
These factors—household growth, housing supply, and housing affordability—are closely linked. As these trends
evolve, ongoing monitoring will be important for understanding how the county’s housing market is changing and
how residents’ needs may shift over time. This information helps inform future land use decisions and provides a
clearer picture of how demographic trends are shaping the community’s housing landscape.
Vacancy Rates and Seasonal Housing
Residential vacancy rates in New Hanover County have remained stable at 13-14% since 2018. However, there has
been an increase in vacant units for seasonal or vacation use, accounting for 7% countywide.
As of 2023, 72% of vacant units in the unincorporated county are for seasonal use, up from 66% in 2018. In
Wilmington, 28% of vacant units are for seasonal use. This highlights how few vacant units in the county are
available for rent or purchase. This suggests that short-term rentals and second homes may be reducing the supply
of housing and may be contributing to rising cost of homes.
Housing Affordability
Mortgage
Rising home prices and higher mortgage rates are making it much harder for people to buy homes. From 2018 to
2023, the typical home price went up by 66%, but the income needed to afford that home went up by 113% — from
$63,770 in 2018 to $135,873 in 2023, and to $141,141 in 2024, mostly because of higher interest rates. Even though
the median household income grew by 52% over that time, it has not kept up, so many families can now afford less
home than before.
18
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 28
Residential Development & Housing Units
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Home Sale Price
The median home sales price in New Hanover County increased by 42% from $287,000 in 2020 to $415,000 in 2023.
Nearly two thirds, or 65%, of homes sold in the county in 2020 sold for $350,000 or less, compared to only 35% of
sales in 2023.
Rental Market
New Hanover County's median gross rent increased by 38% from $1,064 per month in 2018 to $1,466 per month in
2023. Typical market rate asking rents in the county were higher than median gross rents at $1,702 per month in
2023 and $1,726 per month in 2024. More than half (53%) of the county's rental units cost less than $1,000 per
month in 2018. In comparison, the percentage of rental units costing less than $1,000 in 2023 had fallen to 21%.
The typical asking rent* for units in New Hanover County was $1,702 per month in 2023, $236
higher than the median gross rent of $1,466 per month.
*Typical asking rent is the median rent price being listed in a given area. It is a snapshot of the
current market conditions for rental prices.
$287,000
Median home sales price 2020
•65% of homes sold for
≤$350,000
$415,000
Median home sales price 2023
•35% of homes sold for
≤$350,000
Figure 1.22 New Hanover County Distribution of Home Sales Prices by Price Range
Source New Hanover County Tax Department and Housing Needs Assessment (Root Policy) 2025
21%
45%
18%
9%3%4%4%
31%30%
21%
6%8%
< $200,000 $200,000-
$350,000
$350,000-
$500,000
$500,000-
$750,000
$750,000-
$1,000,000
> $1,000,000
New Hanover County
2020 2023
19
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 29
Residential Development & Housing Units
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
From 2018 to 2023 median renter household income increased, however, median gross rent and typical asking rent
also increased meaning renters lost purchasing power or the ability to afford the higher rental rate.
Cost Burden
Cost burden occurs when a household spends more than 30% of its gross income on housing costs. Severe cost
burden occurs when households spend more than 50% of their income on housing costs. Severely cost burdened
households are considered at risk for homelessness. One-third of all New Hanover Couty households are cost
burdened.
Median Renter Income
+45% increase from
2018 to 2023
Median Gross Rent
+38% increase from
2018 to 2023
Typical Asking Rent
+57% increase from
2018 to 2023
24%
12%
17%
29%
9%
17%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
Renter
Owner
All Households
Cost Burden (30-49%)Severe Cost Burden (50%+)
Figure 1.23 Cost Burden and Severe Cost Burden, New Hanover County
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 1-year estimates 2023 and Housing Needs Assessment (Root Policy) 2025
20
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 30
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Transportation
Key Roles and Responsibilities
Transportation planning and project implementation in the
unincorporated county is coordinated in partnership with
the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (WMPO) and North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT).
The WMPO serves as the federally mandated regional
transportation planning agency for the Wilmington
Metropolitan Area, which includes all of New Hanover
County and portions of Pender and Brunswick County. It
develops long-range plans in collaboration with the
member jurisdictions for all six modes of transportation
(aviation, bicycle and pedestrian, ferry, highway, rail, and
transit), manages federal and state transportation funds,
and ensures that there is broad public involvement.
NCDOT Division 3 oversees driveway permitting, safety
improvements, funding prioritization, engineering,
environmental review, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, and long-term maintenance of public roads in
the unincorporated county and much of the larger region.
New Hanover County staff coordinate in the identification of
new transportation projects, participate in WMPO staff-level
advisory committees, and administer the subdivision and other standards that regulate new developer-constructed
roadway infrastructure in the unincorporated county. In addition, the county’s development review process
incorporates a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) component coordinated with WMPO and NCDOT staff who ultimately
approves the TIA. This type of analysis identifies the impact a new development will have on the adjacent roadway
network and identifies the improvements the developer must install to mitigate that impact per NCDOT
requirements. New Hanover County also plays a role in funding and maintaining bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure in areas outside City of Wilmington and the beach towns.
Transportation Planning Process
Projects in New Hanover County are advanced through state and regional planning tools, including the WMPO’s
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and MPO/State Transportation Improvement Program (MPO TIP/STIP). The
WMPO’s plans are the basis for the expenditure of federal transportation dollars in the region, and a project must
be identified in the MPO to be eligible for federal funding.
Map 1.8 WMPO Region & Jurisdictions
Source: Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization 2024
21
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 31
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
The current MTP, Cape Fear Navigating Change 2050, was adopted in October 2025 and guides regional investment
decisions across all modes of travel. The WMPO's plans are the basis for the expenditure of federal transportation
dollars in the region. If a project is not identified in the MTP it will not be eligible for federal funding.
Public participation is central to the transportation planning process. Engagement opportunities include
newsletters, public meetings, formal comment periods for plans and programs, safety campaigns, and participation
in local studies.
Transportation Programming and Development Challenges
In North Carolina, it is challenging to keep transportation planning aligned with the immediate needs of
development, especially for roadways. While new neighborhoods, commercial centers, and industrial sites can take
shape in just a few years, the process of planning, funding, and building transportation infrastructure unfolds over
much longer timelines. Developers are responsible for mitigating the impacts of their individual development on
the roadway network as required by NCDOT, but wider trends in traffic movement that result from regional
development patterns rely on longer term planning and funding prioritization.
The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the product of the Strategic Prioritization process (also
called Prioritization) which carries out the 2013 Strategic Transportation Investment law passed by the State
legislature. This 10-year funding and scheduling plan illustrates how projects are identified and prioritized. Because
projects must compete for limited state and federal dollars, investment decisions focus on addressing existing
deficiencies rather than preparing for future growth. This means infrastructure improvements often arrive years
after development has already occurred.
On average, major roadway projects can take 15 to 30 years or more, from conception to completion. The process
includes multiple stages from environmental studies, design, to right-of-way acquisition and construction. Each of
which can be delayed by regulatory requirements, funding availability, or cost escalation. In recent years, inflation
has caused increased costs to construction and land acquisition which have further strained the limited
transportation budgets, while funding competition among regions remains intense.
The result is a structural imbalance: transportation programming is reactive and designed to fix current problems,
while land development is forward-moving and market-driven. Public funding is not available to support the
construction of public roadway projects that will support future development projections, and the cost for much of
new infrastructure is delegated to the developer and ultimately passed on to future property owners. In addition,
our coastal vulnerability to hydroclimatic threats presents major risks to our transportation network, particularly
roadways, adding to our funding needs.
In rapidly developing areas like those in coastal and urban counties, the gap between where people live, work, and
the infrastructure that connects them continues to widen, underscoring the need for more proactive, flexible, and
better-aligned transportation planning approaches.
22
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 32
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Roadways
New Hanover County, under North
Carolina’s transportation framework,
does not build or maintain roads. Public
roads and streets are generally owned
and maintained by NCDOT or by private
property owners’ associations. However,
there are also roadways in
unincorporated New Hanover County
that were dedicated for public
maintenance but never adopted into the
NCDOT system (so called “orphan
roads”), private roads with inactive
property owners’ associations, and other
access ways that pre-date or are
exempted from subdivision standards.
While there are programs such as the
county's Street Assessment Process,
which provides upfront funding to repair
publicly dedicated roadways so they can
be adopted by NCDOT, there are not
tools to address the maintenance or
upgrading of private roadways and
access ways beyond placing that
responsibility on the adjacent property
owners.
Moreover, the combination of public,
“orphan,” and private roadways within the unincorporated county
influences connectivity and traffic distribution. Traditional methods for
enhancing connectivity through subdivision regulations have faced challenges due to a trend toward more private
road dedications in the face of limited funding for public roadway maintenance, high construction costs, and the
preference for alternative neighborhood designs that do not conform to NCDOT standards, such as restrictions on
utility crossings and the inclusion of street trees. In recent years, residents have sought to limit connectivity
through existing neighborhoods and at times have taken steps to remove or limit connections originally required by
the county as part of the development review process. Even road stubs or connections that were proposed as
public have been affected, as NCDOT may not be able to add them to their maintenance system until further
development occurs.
As the unincorporated county develops, this is an area that requires additional study, data gathering, and
monitoring.
Map 1.9 State Maintained Roads
Source: N.C. DOT 2025
23
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 33
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Multimodal Transportation - Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities provide significant
health, social, environmental, and economic benefits
by supporting safe physical activity and connecting
communities. New Hanover County’s flat terrain, mild
climate, and active student and visitor populations
make it an ideal setting for walking and biking. By
2026, several ongoing projects such as the Market
Street expansion project and the Red Cedar to Market
Street multi-use path are expected to increase the
overall network of multi-use paths, sidewalks, bike
lanes and share-rows. Additional bicycle and
pedestrian projects are projected to be completed
within the next five years.
While New Hanover County does not construct or
maintain public roadways, the county’s Parks &
Gardens Department plays a vital role in advancing the
county’s transportation and infrastructure goals.
Through the planning, development, and maintenance
of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the
unincorporated county, the department enhances
community connectivity and supports a safe,
accessible, and sustainable transportation network.
Outside the county’s municipalities, Parks & Gardens is
responsible for maintaining all existing greenways, trails, and multi-use
paths, including along public roadways. County staff also play a role in
planning and building new segments that link neighborhoods, schools,
parks, and commercial areas. These investments are often made in partnership with agencies such as the WMPO
and NCDOT through the WMPO's Locally Administered Projects Program (LAPP) or in coordination with NCDOT
under the Complete Streets policy that applies when roadway projects are being undertaken. They not only expand
mobility options but also contribute to public health, environmental stewardship, and the overall quality of life for
residents and visitors throughout the county.
In 2024, the New Hanover County Bicycle & Pedestrian Priorities Plan was adopted by the New Hanover County
Board of Commissioners as an amendment to the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. Formal adoption establishes the plan
as an official guide for county staff, which will help the work to align county priorities with regional and state
transportation programming, strengthen the county’s ability to compete for state and federal funding, and ensure
that bicycle and pedestrian projects are integrated into broader transportation and land use decisions.
Map 1.10 Existing, Planned and Priority
Multi-Use Path Facilities
Source: WAVE Transit 2025
24
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 34
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Cape Fear Public Transportation Authority - Wave Transit
New Hanover County is a founding partner of Wave Transit, established through a joint resolution with the City of
Wilmington in 2004 to provide public transportation services across the Wilmington Urbanized Area. This
partnership reflects the county’s recognition that transit is integral to the broader transportation system,
connecting residents to jobs, education, and essential services. The county participates on Wave’s board of
directors—with county staff and elected officials serving alongside city representatives which ensures that
county-wide mobility needs are represented in transit planning.
The county’s support extends beyond governance. In recent years, the county has provided local match funding
necessary for federal grants that WAVE relies on for fleet improvements and transit service expansion. For example,
WAVE’s addition of new compressed natural gas (CNG) buses was made possible with local match contributions
from New Hanover County and the City of Wilmington. Through such investments and its ongoing role in oversight
and planning, the county reinforces its commitment to a transit network that enhances accessibility, supports
economic vitality, and complements other infrastructure investments within the county’s comprehensive
infrastructure framework.
Map 1.11 Wave
Transit Fixed Routes
& RideMICRO Service
Areas
Source: WAVE Transit 2025
25
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 35
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Commuting to Work
According to the American
Community Survey most New
Hanover County residents (72.4%)
commute to work by driving alone,
while 6.8% carpooled. Only 2.5% used
public transit, biking, walking, or
other modes. This information also
includes those who worked from
home, in other words those who do
not have a commute. Those who
worked from home (17.8%)
surpassed the share of those using
shared or alternative transportation
(9.4%). This trend was most likely due
to the global COVID-19 Pandemic in
which many workers remained
working from their home after
restrictions were lifted and workers
were allowed back into their office
spaces.
When looking at transportation other than by personal vehicle (car)
or non-personal occupancy vehicle, Figure 1.25 highlights a strong
use of carpooling which accounted for 71% of the alternate modes
of transportation. Walking and other forms of transportation not
mentioned specifically in the figure accounted for 29% of
alternative ways people went to and from destinations.
72.4%
17.8%
6.8%
1.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.2%
Drove Alone
Worked from home
Carpool
Walked
Other
Bicycle
Public Transportation
71%
15%
12%
2%Carpool
Walked
Other
Public
transportation
Figure 1.24
Commuting to Work
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
American Community Survey
5-year estimates 2023
Figure 1.25 Transportation Other Than Personal Vehicle
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year estimates
2023
26
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 36
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Work from Home Data
The latest American Community Survey (ACS) and estimates from the State Department of Transportation show a
clear increase in work from home opportunities since 2019. For example, in New Hanover County, the work from
home rate rose from about 7.6% during the 2015-2019 ACS period to 14.8% in 2023.
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated remote-work arrangements across many industries. As employers adopted
telework policies and many workers shifted out of traditional office settings, counties with a higher share of
“remote-capable” jobs (professional, technical, administrative) saw larger growth in home-based work.
New Hanover County benefits from an educated workforce and industries that accommodate telework, making a
transition to home-based work more viable. Improvements in connectivity, broadband access, and infrastructure
supportive of remote work contribute to these shifts enabling more workers to remain productive from home
rather than commuting.
The shift in commuter behavior, including shorter commutes, lifestyle preferences for working closer to or at home,
and the adoption of hybrid work models, has contributed to a decrease in the traditional drive-to-work proportion.
Consequently, there has been an increase in the share of individuals designating their usual place of work as their
home.
27
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 37
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Wilmington International Airport
Wilmington International Airport (ILM) is a small-hub commercial service airport owned by New Hanover County and
operated by the New Hanover County Airport Authority. The facility serves Wilmington and the greater
Southeastern North Carolina region and has approximately 70 staff in administration, public safety, operations, and
maintenance positions, led by the Airport Director. After a temporary decline in passenger levels during 2020–2021
due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ILM rebounded strongly in 2022, from 9 destinations to 31 in 2024 with the addition
of 22 nonstop destinations, four new airlines, and larger aircraft on existing routes, resulting in record passenger
volumes (Figure 1.25).
Figure 1.26 includes the total count of flights by type of aircraft. The annual airport operations declined from
approximately 58,000 in 2010 to about 48,000 in 2014 before gradually increasing, with significant increases after
2016. Operations rose sharply from just under 66,000 flights in 2020 to nearly 80,000 in 2021, maintaining that level
through 2022 and climbing to about 88,000 in 2023 (Figure 1.25). This sustained upward trend reflects expanding air
service, increased passenger demand, and overall growth in airport activity.
Itinerant flights, all flights other than the training, practice, or pleasure flights staying near the airport, make up the
majority of ILM’s operations. The total itinerant flights, as shown in Figure 1.26 decreased from 47,827 in 2013 to
around 41,456 in 2015 but steadily rose to a peak of 65,465 in 2024, despite a temporary pandemic-related decline
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Air Carrier & Taxi General Aviation Military
Figure 1.26 ILM Aircraft Flights by Type
Source: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration 2024
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Total Itinerant 47,827 41,837 41,456 43,506 47,825 53,507 56,133 49,003 60,391 61,079 64,510 65,465
Total Local 4,152 4,476 7,418 7,073 10,005 10,258 12,973 16,838 17,979 17,371 23,152 28,758
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Figure 1.27
Total Itinerant
& Local Flights
Source:
U.S. Federal Aviation
Administration 2024
28
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 38
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
in 2020. Local flights, made up of training flights, practice takeoffs and landings, and test flights, also increased from
4,152 in 2013 to 28,758 in 2024. Together, these patterns indicate robust growth in both itinerant and local aviation
activity.
Cargo shipments have trended downward in recent years. In 2021, cargo enplanements (outgoing) peaked at
1,830,767 pounds, with deplanements (incoming) at 1,536,970 pounds. By 2022, those figures declined to 1,671,330
and 1,399,987 pounds, respectively, and continued falling in 2023 until 2024 which saw a slight increase in cargo
pounds (Figure 1.27).
U.S. Customs operations at ILM from 2013 to 2024
remained generally stable, averaging 1,000 - 1,200
aircraft clearances annually. Activity dipped to
roughly 500 in 2020 but rebounded in 2021 and
peaked at about 1,500 in 2022. Passenger
clearances followed a similar pattern, averaging
5,800–6,300 annually before falling to 3,200 in
2020 due to travel restrictions. Since then,
international passenger traffic has exceeded pre-
pandemic levels, reaching record highs of over
7,000 in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (Figure 1.28). This
rebound underscores ILM’s growing role in
international travel and customs processing.
Figure 1.28 Cargo Enplanements & Deplanements
Source: Wilmington International Airport 2024
Figure 1.29 U.S. Customs Activity
Source: U.S. Customs and Boarder Protection 2024
1,
8
3
0
,
7
6
7
1,
6
7
1
,
3
3
0
1,
3
9
9
,
8
2
7
1,
4
1
0
,
1
4
1
1,
5
3
6
,
9
7
0
1,
3
9
9
,
9
8
7
1,
3
0
5
,
5
4
1
1,
4
5
6
,
7
1
6
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2021 2022 2023 2024
Enplanements Deplanements
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Aircraft Cleared Persons Cleared
29
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 39
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
ILM Expansion Projects & Business Park
In addition to the increase in number of new non-stop flights due to recent expansion of the airport terminal (2023)
and growing passenger volume, ILM has been working toward additional improvements to the roadways, terminal
curb-front, expanded parking facilities, and its growing business park.
The ILM Business Park is a 140-acre commercial and industrial campus offering businesses direct access to air,
highway, rail, and port transportation networks. It hosts a mix of tenants including corporate offices, industrial
facilities, and support services including utilities, security, and airport-related services that can accommodate
offices, warehouses, aviation support, cold storage facilities, hotels and other commercial related businesses.
Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study
To help balance airport operations and any impacts on the community, the Wilmington International Airport has
started a Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Study. A Part 150 study is a process that helps airports and the
community understand where airplane noise is most noticeable and identify strategies to improve noise
compatibility with airport operations and nearby residents and businesses. The study launched in spring 2024 with
funding from the Federal Aviation Administration and involves community engagement and technical analysis and is
expected to be completed in the spring of 2026.
More information about Wilmington International Airport, future expansions, and the Part 150 Noise Compatibility
Study can be found on the airport’s website. Additional airport operations data can be found on the Federal
Aviation Administration’s Operations Network data portal (OPSNET), the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s
Traveler and Conveyance Statistics tool, and the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organizations
current Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
30
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 40
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Freight Rail Service
As Wilmington continues to grow, so is the need for smarter, more efficient ways to move goods and people. One
area seeing major transformation is rail infrastructure—especially around the Port of Wilmington, which is
becoming a key hub for freight movement across the eastern United States. The Port offers daily rail service that
connects directly to inland markets, allowing containers arriving by ship to be loaded onto trains at the dock and
reducing the number of trucks on the highways.
Intermodal rail connectivity is offered through three CSX-operated express services—the Wilmington Midwest
Express, Queen City Express, and Wilmington–Rocky Mount Express—all featuring on-dock rail functionality with no
rail dwell time. This allows highly efficient ship-to-rail transfers and positions Wilmington as one of the fastest ports
on the East Coast.
Launched in November 2021, the Wilmington Midwest Express provides direct daily service to Midwest markets,
reaching Chicago and Northwest Ohio in approximately five days and St. Louis in seven. The Queen City Express
connects the port to the Charlotte Inland Port with next-day or overnight service, reducing first- and last-mile
trucking distances, lowering transportation costs and emissions, and improving access to Southeastern distribution
corridors. Introduced in September 2023, the Wilmington–Rocky Mount Express provides daily overnight service to
CSX’s Carolina Connector terminal, strengthening connections to the I-95 corridor and northeastern North Carolina.
Local rail operations within the port are supported by the Wilmington Terminal Railroad (WTRY), a Genesee &
Wyoming short-line that maintains approximately three miles of track and storage capacity for about 300 railcars.
Interchanging directly with CSX, WTRY manages terminal switching and on-dock loading and unloading, ensuring
efficient connections between port facilities and the national rail network. Ongoing investments, including a new rail
yard capable of handling more than 50,000 containers annually, are intended to further enhance freight efficiency.
Future Rail Network
The Federal Railroad Administration’s Corridor Identification and Development (Corridor ID) Program is helping
advance future passenger rail service by providing a step-by-step process to move rail corridors from concept to
implementation. Building on the Southeast Rail Feasibility Study completed in 2024, the program focuses on
refining service plans, identifying project sponsors, and positioning corridors for future federal funding rather than
conducting a single feasibility study. Separately, a federally supported feasibility study is exploring the potential for
future intercity passenger rail service between Wilmington and Raleigh, but no funding or construction plan has
been approved yet.
31
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 41
Transportation
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Port of Wilmington
The Port of Wilmington is a major economic anchor for New Hanover County and the broader region. Located 26 miles
inland along the Cape Fear River, it serves as one of the East Coast’s key gateways for international trade. The port
includes a deep-water channel, multiple berths, and a large container terminal capable of handling hundreds of thousands
of shipping containers each year. Its 284-acre footprint includes extensive warehouse space, specialized cranes, and direct
rail access on site, allowing goods to move efficiently between ships, trucks, and trains. The port handles a variety of cargo
types—including containers, bulk materials, and vehicles—which supports a diverse range of businesses and industries.
Easy access to I-40 and I-95 places the Port of Wilmington within a one-day drive of much of the U.S. industrial base,
making it an important hub for both regional and national supply chains. The port offers cold-storage and refrigerated
container services, federal inspection facilities, and real-time cargo tracking, helping to move perishable goods safely and
reliably. These capabilities—combined with strong rail and highway connections—support jobs, attract private investment,
and influence how surrounding land is used for industrial, warehouse, and logistics activity. As New Hanover County plans
for future growth, the Port of Wilmington will remain a critical asset shaping transportation corridors, employment centers,
and the county’s role in the global economy.
903,861
640,700
525,472
328,286
307,798
Fuel Wood
Nitrogenous
Fertilizer
Alcohols
Wood in the
Rough
Pulp & Waste
Paper
Figure 1.30 Top Commodities 2021 (in short tons)
Source: N.C. Ports Authority 2021
32
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 42
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Economy
New Hanover County anchors one of the North Carolina’s fastest-growing metro economies. While Health Care and
Social Assistance, Accommodation and Food Services, and Retail Trade continue to employ the largest share of
residents, together representing more than 40% of local jobs, the region’s economic base has diversified and added
nearly 14 % more jobs since 2020. Growth has been strongest in Health Care, Professional and Scientific Services,
and Construction, even as housing affordability and wage polarization remain persistent challenges.
Average wages in the Wilmington region now exceed the statewide average and have grown faster than inflation
since 2020, reflecting productivity gains even within a predominantly service-based economy. Despite these gains,
income inequality remains a characteristic of the local labor market. High-wage professional and technical sectors
employ relatively few people but pay substantially more than the service sectors that dominate total employment.
This creates a polarized wage structure with limited opportunities for middle-income earners and contributes to
uneven economic resilience among households.
Geographically, these disparities are especially visible. Within the City of Wilmington, median household income is
roughly $64,000 and the poverty rate exceeds 16%, substantially higher than the county average. In contrast,
several unincorporated areas of the county record median household incomes exceeding $160,000 and poverty
rates near 1%. This contrast means that county-level averages mask a wide range of local economic conditions,
ranging from pockets of disadvantage and vulnerability to highly affluent neighborhoods.
Income and Wage Disparities
In 2023, average weekly wages ranged from $1,900 in Professional and Scientific Services to $469 in
Accommodation and Food Services. The median annual household income in New Hanover County of $72,892
exceeds the state average, however, non-family households earn substantially less, which is a sign of economic
vulnerability for single income earners living alone. Unemployment dropped below 4% by 2024, indicating a strong
job market; however, reliance on lower-wage service jobs can limit upward mobility for some residents. This
underscores the importance of continued workforce development, training pipelines, targeted investments, and
regulatory support for higher wage industries to create more balanced economic opportunities (Figure 1.31).
$469
$769
$775
$890
$986
$1,242
$1,253
$1,293
$1,590
$1,900
Accommodation and Food
Retail
Other Services (no Public Administration)
Administrative and Waste Management
Educational Services
Public Administration
Health Care & Social Assistance
Construction
Manufacturing
Professional & Scientific Services
Figure 1.31 Top Ten Average Weekly Wages by Job Sector
Source: N.C. Department of Commerce Q3 2023
33
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 43
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Comparative Household and Family Income
Household income is the total income of all
people living in a housing unit, whether they
are related or not, while family income
includes only the income of people who are
related by birth, marriage, or adoption and
live together.
New Hanover County’s median household
income slightly surpasses the North Carolina
average but remains below the national
level. Family income, however, exceeds both
state and national medians, showing
relatively strong financial standing among
family units, while single-person and non-
family households face more modest
income levels. Within the county, median
incomes vary sharply by geography, with higher
incomes along coastal and suburban corridors
(Figure 1.32).
Regional Per Capita Income Comparison
Among the surrounding counties,
New Hanover County has the highest
per capita income, exceeding $46,000.
Brunswick County follows closely
behind. This metric is a standard
indicator of economic well-being and
purchasing power, though it does not
reflect cost of living differences. The
U.S. average is slightly below that of
Brunswick County, while North
Carolina falls behind both the national
and regional figures. Pender County
reports the lowest per capita income
at just over $38,000.
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
Household Family Nonfamily
New Hanover North Carolina United States
Figure 1.33 Per Capita Income
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
$46,083
$39,616
$43,289
$38,296
$44,565
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
New Hanover North
Carolina
United States Pender Brunswick
Figure 1.32 Median Household Income
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community
Survey 5-year estimates 2023
34
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 44
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Poverty Rates
Despite relatively high incomes, New Hanover County has one of the higher poverty rates in the region. Individual
poverty exceeds 12%, comparable to the state average and higher than Brunswick (9%) and Pender (11%) counties.
Family poverty rates are lower overall, though New Hanover still ranks slightly above its neighbors at around 7%.
However, within the county, poverty is largely concentrated within specific neighborhoods, especially within the City
of Wilmington, where rates surpass 25-30% in some census tracts, while many unincorporated areas experience
single-digit poverty. This contrast underscores persistent economic disparities, in which strong median incomes
coexist with notable pockets of need, particularly among individuals living outside family households (Figure 1.34).
Employment Distribution
The structure of New Hanover County’s job market reflects its identity as both a regional service hub and a center
for health care, hospitality, and construction. Health Care and Social Assistance remains the county’s economic
anchor, employing the largest share of local workers and continuing to expand as the population grows and ages.
Close behind are Accommodation and Food Services and Retail Trade, together forming the foundation of the
county’s visitor-driven and consumer-oriented economy. Collectively, these three sectors account for more than
two out of every five jobs in the county, underscoring the continued importance of service sector industries for local
jobs.
Beyond these core sectors, employment in Professional and Scientific Services, Construction, and Administrative
Support has steadily increased—reflecting the county’s growing base of professional firms, technical services, and
contractors supporting both residents and the tourism industry. At the same time, fields such as Utilities,
Information, and corporate management remain relatively small, highlighting that while New Hanover County’s
economy is expanding and diversifying, it still has limited representation in high-tech and infrastructure-intensive
industries.
12.4%
7.0%
13.2%
9.4%
12.5%
8.7%
10.7%
7.0%
9.4%
6.2%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
Individuals Families
New Hanover North Carolina United States Pender County Brunswick County
Figure 1.34 People and Families with Income Below the Poverty Level
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2023
35
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 45
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Wages by Industry
Earnings in New Hanover County vary widely by occupation, revealing a contrast between the region’s professional
and service-oriented sectors. The county’s highest wages are found in Professional and Scientific Services,
Manufacturing, and Health Care—industries that rely on specialized skills, education, and investment in technology.
Construction and Public Administration also provide solid middle-income opportunities, offering wages that support
stable, long-term employment for residents.
At the other end of the spectrum, jobs in hospitality and retail remain among the lowest-paying, even though they
employ thousands of workers and form much of the public face of the local economy. This illustrates a persistent
challenge: many of the county’s most visible and essential industries offer limited wage growth, and the highest-
paying opportunities are concentrated in smaller, more specialized fields.
Wage Growth Trends
Over the past decade, wages have risen steadily.
From 2014 to 2024, New Hanover County’s average
weekly wages rose from approximately $777 to
$1,202 (Figure 1.35). Though absolute levels remain
below state and national averages, growth has
been strong, signaling a tightening labor market
and improving wage competitiveness.
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
New Hanover County North Carolina United States
Figure 1.35 Average Weekly Wage Comparison
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2023
Figure 1.36 Average Weekly Wages Over Time
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2023
$777 $865 $988
$1,202
$1,401 $1,527
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
$1,600
New Hanover
County
North Carolina United States
20
1
4
20
2
4
20
2
4
20
1
4
20
2
4
20
1
4
36
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 46
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Unemployment and Employment Composition
The local labor market rebounded quickly from the disruptions of the 2020 pandemic. After unemployment spiked
to its highest levels in decades regionally, conditions improved steadily as tourism, construction, and professional
services regained momentum. By 2024, New Hanover County’s unemployment rate had fallen to roughly 3%, one
of the lowest in the region and below the state and national averages (Figure 1.37).
This recovery underscores the county’s economic resilience and the strength of employer demand across a wide
range of industries. Nearly nine out of ten local jobs are in the private sector, reflecting an economy anchored by
small businesses, health care, and professional services. Public-sector employment accounts for a smaller but
stable share—about one in ten jobs—split among local, state, and federal agencies. Together this mix points to a
labor market that is both robust and diversified, with steady public employment providing a reliable foundation
through periods of economic change.
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
8.0%
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
New Hanover North Carolina Pender County Brunswick County United States
Figure 1.37 Average Annual Unemployment Rate
Source: N.C. Department of Commerce 2024
37
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 47
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Income Composition and Economic Performance
Across the United States, North Carolina, and New Hanover County, most households rely primarily on wages and
salaries as their main source of income, typically about three-quarters of total earnings (Figure 1.39). New Hanover
County slightly outpaces both the state and national averages in this category, as well as in income derived from
investments such as interest, dividends, and rental property. These trends reflect a strong employment base and a
growing share of households with accumulated wealth and retirement assets.
Social Security and other retirement income also play a significant role in the local economy. Roughly 30% of
residents across the region receive Social Security income, and about one in four report retirement income. As
indicated in Figure 1.39, New Hanover County’s incomes are slightly higher, which is consistent with the county’s
older age profile and attractiveness to retirees. Overall, traditional employment earnings, wages, salaries,
retirement benefits, including social security and with retirement income, remain the dominant income sources,
while reliance on public assistance and other income types is comparatively limited.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
New Hanover County North Carolina United States
Figure 1.38 Income by Type
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2022 1-year estimates
38
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 48
Economy
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Economic Trends
A shift-share analysis of employment change from 2012 to 2022 provides further insight into how local industries
have performed relative to broader trends. This type of analysis measures how much an industry’s growth or
decline differs from the national trend for the same industry and can provide key insights on local economic
performance. Health Care and Social Assistance showed the strongest competitive effect, adding more than 7,000
jobs beyond what national and industry growth alone would predict. Retail Trade, Construction, and Transportation
and Warehousing also outperformed expectations, suggesting strong regional demand and favorable local
conditions supporting business expansion. In contrast, Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, and Accommodation and
Food Services experienced weaker growth, reflecting their sensitivity to national market shifts and technological
changes.
Together, these trends point to a regional economy that is growing stronger and more complex. Sustaining this
momentum will depend on strategies that expand access to higher-wage employment, strengthen local talent
pipelines, and support business sectors that diversify the economic base. At the same time, addressing disparities
in income, geography, and opportunity will be essential to ensuring that future growth benefits residents across all
parts of New Hanover County. By aligning workforce development, infrastructure investment, and housing
affordability initiatives, the county can build an economy that remains resilient and well-positioned for the decades
ahead.
39
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 49
Infrastructure
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Infrastructure
Telecommunications
Nearly all residents (99.72%) of New Hanover County have at least 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload internet
speeds. These speeds meet the Federal Communication Commission’s basic broadband definition. Additionally, a
nearly identical percentage, 99.66%, have access availability to significantly faster speeds of 100 Mbps download
and 20 Mbps upload. This indicates a robust digital infrastructure in the county, suggesting that broadband access
is unlikely to be a major barrier to education, remote work, or digital services for most residents.
In New Hanover County, 59.88% of residents have high-speed fiber technology available, providing fast and reliable
internet service. The remaining 40.12% rely on other connection types such as cable, DSL, or satellite. This
distribution reflects a strong foundation in digital infrastructure but also highlights the need for further expansion
to ensure more equitable access to high-quality internet across the county.
Actual access to or use of high speed internet and technology in general is not equal for everyone as factors such as
age, income, the presence of children and educational attainment can be barriers. These barriers to internet and
technology access is known as the digital divide.
New Hanover County does have some digital divide, with a larger percentage of the population lacking internet
connections (7.1%) compared to those without computer devices (4.44%). This suggests that while many of these
households may have computers or digital devices, they still face barriers to getting online, such as affordability,
infrastructure, or service availability. The gap between the two percentages implies that internet connectivity, rather
than device ownership, is the more prevalent challenge. This distinction is important for policymakers and service
providers aiming to improve digital access, as it indicates that solutions should prioritize expanding affordable and
reliable internet access.
This information comes from the North Carolina Department of Information Technology through the Broadband &
Digital Opportunity website and the N.C. Broadband Indices (2021).
40
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 50
Infrastructure
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Water and Wastewater Systems
The Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) is the primary water and wastewater service provider in New Hanover
County. Formed in 2008 through the consolidation of City of Wilmington and county water and sewer systems,
CFPUA supports the majority of residents and businesses with high-quality drinking water and robust wastewater
treatment infrastructure. CFPUA water systems also serve as water sources for fire suppression.
CFPUA delivers an average of 20.83 million gallons of drinking water per day (MGD), with capacity to provide up to
52 MGD. Water supply is derived from three independent sources—the Cape Fear River and the Castle Hayne and
Peedee aquifers—providing both redundancy and long-term system resiliency. The Wilmington Water System
serves most urban and suburban areas, supported by two primary treatment plants:
• Sweeney Water Treatment Plant (44 MGD), treating surface water from the Cape Fear River.
• Richardson Water Treatment Plant (7 MGD), treating groundwater using low-pressure reverse osmosis.
Two additional systems supplement countywide service. The Monterey Heights Water System supplies portions of
southern New Hanover County through Castle Hayne Aquifer wells, with a booster connection to the main
Wilmington system. In 2025, CFPUA also assumed ownership and operation of the Wrightsville Beach Water
System, integrating four potable groundwater wells and two treatment centers serving approximately 2,800 year-
round customers.
Wastewater service is provided through two major treatment facilities:
• James A. Loughlin (Northside) Plan – 16 MGD capacity, upgraded to improve treatment performance and
protect water quality in the Cape Fear Fiver.
• M’Kean Maffit (Southside) Plant – 12 MGD capacity, with design and permitting complete to expand to 16
MGD in phases.
A cornerstone of CFPUA’s wastewater capacity management is the ability to shift flows between treatment plants,
pump stations, and force mains. This operational flexibility reduces spill risks, supports ongoing maintenance, and
ensures capacity remains ahead of development-related demand.
In recent years, CFPUA has partnered closely with New Hanover County to extend new water and sewer
infrastructure into northern areas of the county, supporting planned growth and reducing reliance on private wells
and septic systems. The two organizations also continue to partner on obtaining funding to provide safe drinking
water to communities with private well contamination, especially in relation to emerging contaminants and “forever
chemicals” such as the group of Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances also known as PFAS/PFOS, or poor water quality.
CFPUA is also advancing upgrades to the Maffit/Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant to ensure the system
remains ahead of long-term development demand.
In addition to CFPUA, several smaller utility providers operate within New Hanover County. Aqua of North Carolina
serves communities in the southern portion of the county using Castle Hayne Aquifer wells and has recently
expanded system capacity with new wells, water mains, and a 500,000-gallon water tower. Carolina Water Service
provides water service to a small portion of the Middle Sound community. Residents outside public utility service
areas rely on private wells and septic systems, permitted and inspected by the county’s Environmental Health
Services division. These systems require sufficient land area for well and septic separation, drainfields, and reserve
areas, and present long-term maintenance considerations that influence local development patterns.
41
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 51
Infrastructure
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Map 1.12 Water and Sewer Service Availability
Source: Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Aqua, NHC Planning & Land Use 2024
42
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 52
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
New Hanover County Community Services
New Hanover Parks and Gardens
New Hanover County recognizes that its parks, recreation amenities, and open spaces are essential to residents’
quality of life. There are 16 county parks in the unincorporated county allowing for a variety of outdoor and
recreational activities.
The National Recreation and Park Association recommends a minimum of 10 acres of park or recreational space
per 1,000 residents. By comparison, New Hanover County provides about 16.5 acres per 1,000 residents, exceeding
the national standard. Most of these facilities are publicly owned and available to the community at no charge.
Map 1.13 illustrates the locations of parks and open space areas, ranging in size and function from small
neighborhood parks to large regional facilities. In addition, the county offers 15 public water access points providing
entry to lakes, creeks, the Cape Fear River, and the Intracoastal Waterway. Three access points, Riverside Park,
Trails End Park and River Road Park, utilized funding from the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management’s
Public Beach and Waterfront Access Grant Program. This program helps fund accessibility to public waters within
the 20 coastal counties under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
The Parks and Gardens Department partners with the New Hanover County School System to operate several
baseball and multi-purpose fields. These facilities are generally available to the public outside of school hours.
Together, the county and school system contribute approximately 801 acres of school parks, further expanding
recreational opportunities for residents.
Below is an inclusive list of the entire New Hanover County parks system. It covers every county-managed park,
preserve, trail, and special-use facility, with notes on acreage, amenities, and accessibility features. Not only does
this reference help residents find places to walk, play, paddle, and connect with nature, it also shows how facilities
serve different parts of the county. Parks and Gardens projects are guided by the departments 10-year Master Plan,
the most recent of which was adopted on January 23, 2017. The plan is available on the New Hanover County Parks
and Gardens website.
43
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 53
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
New Hanover County Schools shares multipurpose and baseball fields at Myrtle Grove Middle
School, and Easton Elementary, and tennis courts at Laney High School.
Airlie Gardens
67 acres. Formal gardens, walking paths, sculptures, events. Admission fee.
Arrowhead Park
18-hole disc golf; full basketball; pickleball; gaga ball; multi-purpose field; first-come picnic shelter; playground.
Blue Clay Bike Park
8 miles of trails for all levels of cyclists.
Cape Fear Museum Park
Outdoor exhibits, native/adapted plantings, programs; dawn-to-dusk.
Echo Farms Park
0.75-mile paved trail; seasonal public swimming pool; clay tennis courts;
recurring clinics/programs.
Hanover Pines Nature Park
42.5 acres. 1.25-mile walking trail, dog park, picnic shelter, restrooms,
environmental education elements.
Kings Grant Park
Playground, picnic shelter, basketball court & recreational multi-purpose
field
Long Leaf Park
1.55-mile walking trail; inclusive playground; splashpad (seasonal); dog
park; 4 lighted tennis courts; 4 little-league ballfields; basketball (2); sand volleyball; outdoor gym; six reservable shelters; gardens/gazebo (weddings).
Monterey Heights Park
Playground, picnic shelter, 0.3-mile paved walking trail & multi-purpose
field.
Northern Regional Park (Castle Hayne)
1.7-mile asphalt trail; 18-hole disc golf; 4 lighted soccer/football fields; 6
pickleball courts; basketball; practice baseball field; two reservable shelters; playground.
Ogden Park
~1-mile accessible trail; 10,000-sq-ft concrete skatepark; dog park; 9 lighted tennis courts; 3 lighted soccer/football fields; baseball & softball
fields; basketball; outdoor gym; three reservable shelters; youth stadium.
Pages Creek Park Preserve
23 acres; 1-mile nature trail; kayak launch (permit storage available); environmental education.
Parkwood Park
0.5-mile paved loop; multi-age playground; full & half basketball courts; practice field; two first-come picnic shelters.
River Road Park
Playground; picnic shelter; restrooms; fishing pier; ramp for small boat & kayak launch.
Riverside Park
Neighborhood park.
Smith Creek Park / Preserve
Paved 1.3-mile loop around lake; (nature trail under construction); fishing pier & floating dock; small-boat/kayak launch; outdoor gym;
nature-themed playground; first-come picnic shelter.
Story Park at Downtown Library
Small downtown play/reading space (story-themed pocket park).
Summer Rest Trail
Waterfront path and overlook (passive, no facilities).
Trails End Park
Public boat ramp (kayaks/boats ≤22′) near Masonboro Island; fishing
pier; picnic tables.
Veterans Park
0.5-mile walking trail; 6 baseball fields (plus Ashley HS & Murray MS
fields on-site), 2 soccer + 4 combination soccer/football fields (lighted); 9 lighted tennis courts; 3 sand-volleyball courts; 2 reservable shelters; playground; major-event areas.
44
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 54
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Parks and recreation are core public services that elevate quality of life and place. Well-designed, equitably
distributed parks and greenways reduce heat and flood risks, improve air and water quality, support active travel,
and provide low-cost spaces for exercise, play, learning, and social connection. These spaces signal civic pride, raise
property values, draw talent and investment. Sustained investment in parks and recreation is a strategic investment
in the community’s competitiveness and long-term resilience.
Map 1.13 New Hanover County Parks and Water Access areas
Source: NHC Parks & Gardens Department, Planning & Land Use 2025
45
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 55
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Stormwater
New Hanover County’s coastal location, rapid development, and aging infrastructure make stormwater
management a critical priority. Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces carries pollutants into waterways,
threatens ecosystems, and increases flooding risks. Regulatory responsibility is shared between the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality and local government, with the county implementing and enforcing
standards through its Stormwater Management Ordinance, Stormwater Design Manual, and Unified Development
Ordinance. These regulations establish permitting, inspection, and maintenance requirements, with specific
measures for sensitive areas like wetlands and floodplains. The county’s Stormwater Services Program, launched in
2020, centralizes public drainage infrastructure maintenance, and drainage improvement projects assisting
property owners and funding work through a dedicated fee, which subsequently started in 2021.
Engineering efforts include tracking more than 785 reported drainage concerns, most concentrated in areas prior to
the county’s stormwater ordinance, and maintaining an active workload of roughly 70 ongoing projects.
Infrastructure monitoring is supported by United States Geological Survey (USGS) and county-operated stream
gages. There are plans to expand the network for improved flood forecasting, drainage modeling, and planning. The
county’s capital program includes approximately 150 mapped projects, with some in design process, others
awaiting construction, and many under evaluation for inclusion in the five-year Capital Improvement Plan. While
much current work is reactive, the county aims to shift toward proactive watershed studies and system
improvements.
Low Impact Development (LID) strategies, which mimic natural processes to manage stormwater at its source, are
promoted as sustainable alternatives to traditional “gray” infrastructure, such as curbs, gutters, and pipes. While LID
offers benefits like pollutant filtration, aquifer recharge, and reduced urban heat island effects, it faces challenges
with large storm events, limited urban space, soil constraints, and maintenance needs. The county’s LID Guidance
Manual outlines design principles, regulatory considerations, and best practices for implementing techniques.
46
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 56
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Law Enforcement
The New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office works to keep residents safe through law enforcement, community
programs, and partnerships with other agencies. Its mission focuses on preventing crime, supporting rehabilitation
for those leaving incarceration, and maintaining professionalism and accountability within its ranks. The office
continues to invest in leadership training, workforce diversity, and outreach programs that build trust and
connection with the community.
As the county’s population has grown, so has the Sheriff’s Office. Staffing has expanded from fewer than 800
employees in 2010–2011 to more than 1,200 in 2024–2025, including both sworn deputies and civilian staff. This
growth has strengthened the agency’s ability to respond quickly and effectively across the county. Over the past
decade, reported crimes have generally declined, especially between 2014 and 2018 with larceny remaining the
most common offense, followed by burglary. Violent crime has stayed relatively low and stable.
Additional Services and Programs
The Animal Services Unit aims to protect the public from rabies exposure and ensure proper animal care through
prevention, education, and public awareness. As part of the Sheriff's Office, the unit enforces state laws, county
health regulations, and animal control ordinances related to domestic animals, and provides support to other law
enforcement agencies when needed.
In the unincorporated areas of the county, the Sheriff’s Department handles complaints about property
maintenance such as tall weeds, high grass, debris, or other suspected nuisance violations, while noise complaints
are directed to the Sheriff’s Office, and animal-related complaints go to the Sheriff’s Office Animal Services Unit.
The office also runs several programs designed to protect residents and promote safety, including:
• Project Lifesaver uses tracking technology to locate missing individuals with conditions such as Alzheimer’s
or autism.
• Bring the Lost Home combines trained K9 units and community alerts to assist with search efforts.
• Elements, a youth program for ages 8–17, focuses on preventing violence and keeping young people on a
positive path through collaboration with families, schools, and local partners.
47
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 57
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
New Hanover County Fire Rescue
New Hanover County Fire Rescue (NHCFR)
protects the unincorporated areas of the county
with a team of full-time, part-time, and
volunteer responders. They handle more than
6,000 emergencies a year including medical,
fire, and hazardous material incidents.
Additionally, NHCFR is also the first responder
on the most serious medical calls at the EMT-
Basic level and, with Wilmington Fire
Department, operates Task Force 11. This task
force is one of North Carolina’s seven Urban
Search and Rescue teams with swift-water
rescue capability.
As part of the Planning and Land Use
Department's Technical Review Committee,
NHCFR ensures new subdivisions and site
developments comply with North Carolina Fire
Code standards. Key rules include roads at least
20 feet wide that can support heavy vehicles,
accessible routes without traffic-calming
features, buildings within 150 feet (or 200 feet
with sprinklers) for firefighting reach, pre-
approved gates on access roads, and public
water lines of 6 inches or larger with hydrants
every 1,000 feet. These measures ensure quick
access and reliable water supply, reducing risk, damage, and insurance costs.
Collectively, these capabilities and programs demonstrate NHCFR’s commitment to protecting life and property
while strengthening community safety. NHCFR has established a goal that 90% of calls will meet the county’s
response-time benchmark and has shown improved performance, with measures improving from 44.5% to 69.4%
in FY2024. This demonstrates how NHCFR is delivering faster, more reliable service across the unincorporated
county, and work continues to focus on response time through the strategic placement of new fire stations along
Castle Hayne Rd. and Gordon Rd.
While incidents are highly critical, its education, prevention, and risk-reduction initiatives equip residents,
businesses, and schools with practical tools to prevent emergencies before they occur. For instance, the
department reduces risk through investigations, inspections, and safety education, plus practical programs like child
car-seat checks, the “Remembering When” fall-prevention program for older adults, fire-extinguisher training for
businesses, medication drop boxes, and school-based fire and life-safety lessons. This comprehensive approach
ensures a safer, more resilient New Hanover County.
Map 1.14 New Hanover County Fire Stations
Source: NHC Fire Rescue 2025
48
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 58
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Health and Human Services
New Hanover County Health and Human Services (HHS) integrates Public Health and Social Services to deliver
comprehensive support for residents’ medical, social, and economic needs. The department emphasizes
prevention, early intervention, and long-term assistance so individuals and families can access essential services at
every stage of life. It also provides crisis support—such as emergency assistance, disaster response coordination,
and housing and utility help—and partners with community groups, nonprofits, and faith-based organizations to
extend resources countywide.
HHS conducts a Community Health Assessment (CHA) every three years to identify top health needs and strengths
through surveys, focus groups, and data analysis. The findings drive a multi-year Community Health Improvement
Plan (CHIP) that sets priorities, goals, strategies, and partners. Between assessments, the State of the County Health
(SCOTH) report tracks progress on CHIP priorities, highlights new data and trends, and flags emerging issues.
Together, these tools create a continuous assess-plan-act-report cycle that keeps efforts focused and accountable.
The Environmental Health division protects the public’s well-being by preventing illness and reducing environmental
risks where people live, learn, work, and play. Staff permit, inspect, and monitor restaurants and food trucks,
childcare centers, public pools, schools, hotels, and other regulated facilities. The division also oversees onsite
wastewater (septic) systems and private drinking-water wells and investigates related complaints. Beyond routine
inspections, it provides community education and technical assistance, and through enforcement, outreach, and
rapid response helps prevent outbreaks, safeguard water, and support a healthy, resilient community.
Collectively, these efforts make HHS a comprehensive safeguard for community health—meeting daily needs,
preparing for emerging challenges, and responding effectively in crises. By integrating Public Health and Social
Services, using the CHA-CHIP–SCOTH cycle to set and track priorities, and enforcing strong Environmental Health
protections, the department delivers coordinated care from prevention through long-term support. Residents
benefit from accessible services, safer environments, and data-driven programs that reduce risk and improve
outcomes. The result is a healthier, more resilient New Hanover County.
Emergency Management
New Hanover County Emergency Management protects residents, businesses, and visitors by preparing for,
responding to, and recovering from natural and human-made hazards. Its mission is to coordinate resources and
strategies that minimize risks to life, property, and the environment through emergency plans, strong interagency
partnerships, and clear public information.
The department plans for a wide range of threats—hurricanes, flooding, severe storms, and hazardous materials
incidents. At the center of operations is the Emergency Operations Center (EOC), which coordinates multi-agency
responses, while public alert systems, evacuation planning, and sheltering ensure timely, accurate information and
assistance when it matters most.
Beyond response, Emergency Management prioritizes preparedness and resilience. It provides training, exercises,
and outreach to schools, businesses, and community groups, and advances hazard-mitigation efforts like floodplain
management and land-use coordination to reduce long-term risks—helping New Hanover County remain safer and
more resilient over time.
49
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 59
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
These efforts together deliver a clear community benefit by ensuring the county is safer, more prepared, and
maintains a faster recovery period. By uniting planning, real-time coordination through the EOC, reliable alerts, and
well-practiced evacuation and sheltering, Emergency Management protects lives, property, and critical services
when hazards strike. At the same time, ongoing training, outreach, and mitigation such as floodplain management
and land-use coordination reduce long-term risks and costs, strengthen public confidence, and build lasting
resilience for New Hanover County.
Recycling and Solid Waste
New Hanover County Recycling and Solid Waste provides essential services that protect public health, preserve the
environment, and promote sustainability. The department manages the county landfill, recycling facilities, and
collection centers, offering residents safe, convenient options for disposing of household trash, yard debris, bulky
items, and hazardous materials such as electronics, tires, and appliances. These services help extend landfill life
while protecting natural resources and preventing harmful substances from entering waterways.
Recycling is a central focus, with curbside collection, drop-off sites, and special programs that divert paper, plastics,
glass, and metals from the waste stream. By increasing recycling participation and reducing contamination, the
department lowers disposal costs, conserves energy, and reduces greenhouse-gas emissions. Partnerships with
schools, businesses, and community groups further encourage sustainable practices and shared responsibility for
environmental health.
Alongside daily operations, the department prioritizes education and innovation. Public outreach programs give
residents clear guidance on recycling, while ongoing initiatives explore new ways to reduce waste and recover
resources.
New Hanover County has operated its regional landfill since 1981; it was the first lined landfill in North Carolina. The
site uses engineered liners that exceed state and federal requirements, along with constructed wetlands and a
double reverse-osmosis system to treat leachate. In recent years the county has added a Customer Convenience
Center with a high-capacity shredder for bulky waste, advanced a landfill-gas-to-renewable-natural-gas project with
Archaea Energy, installed solar panels to power the reverse-osmosis plant, and continued capacity work through
new cell construction (12B and 13) and lagoon relining. These initiatives extend capacity, cut emissions, and recover
value from the waste stream.
Senior Resource Center
The most significant demographic shift in New Hanover County between 2000 and 2020 was the growth of the older
population. During this period, the share of residents aged 65 and older more than doubled, rising from 10% to
21%. To support this growing demographic, the New Hanover County Senior Resource Center serves as a hub
dedicated to enhancing the well-being, independence, and quality of life of older adults. The center provides access
to essential resources, social and recreational opportunities, and trusted guidance on health, housing, nutrition, and
caregiving.
The center offers a wide range of programs tailored to diverse needs, including fitness classes, evidence-based
health workshops, and support groups for chronic conditions, fall prevention, and caregiving. Educational sessions
50
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 60
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
on financial literacy, legal rights, and Medicare keep residents informed and empowered, while arts, music, cultural
events, group outings, volunteer roles, and peer-led activities strengthen social connection and reduce isolation.
Beyond programming, the center delivers essential direct services such as home-delivered meals, transportation
assistance, referrals for housing, and caregiver respite. In addition, the center advocates for older adults by
partnering with local agencies, health providers, and community organizations to expand resources, close service
gaps, and advance supportive policies, making the Senior Resource Center a vital asset for wellness, independence,
and inclusion.
Located in the City of Wilmington next to Hoggard High School, the Senior Resource Center sits within the urban
core and is well served by major transportation routes. Even so, the center has satellite sites at the Castle Hayne
Community Church and at the Katie B. Hines Center located in Carolina Beach to better reach residents in the
northern and southern parts of the county. Similarly to the main center, these satellite hubs offer a host of
programs and activities such as nutrition, recreation, social services, and volunteer opportunities. Through strong
community partnerships, the satellite hubs bring services to more residents, reducing travel burdens and
expanding access to a wide range of resources and activities.
As a whole, these programs and services make the Senior Resource Center a cornerstone of healthy aging in New
Hanover County by helping older adults stay active, connected, and independent. In combining preventive health
education, social engagement, direct supports like meals and transportation, and strong community advocacy, the
center reduces isolation, eases caregiver burdens, and helps more residents age in place with dignity. As an
advocate, the center is exploring options for a future site to better meet growing demand and enhance service
delivery, signaling a proactive approach to long-term community needs.
New Hanover County Public Libraries
The New Hanover County Public Library system is a cornerstone of lifelong learning, community engagement, and
equitable access to information across the whole county. The system includes four open branches: the Main
(downtown Wilmington), Northeast Regional, Pine Valley, and Pleasure Island and a fifth, the 19,941-square-foot
Northchase Library, now under construction, that will house roughly 50,000 items when it is opened (expected in
2026). Across locations, services go far beyond lending books. The libraries offer free Wi-Fi, computers, study rooms,
early-literacy programs, and a full calendar of cultural events, workshops, and exhibits.
Recently, the Main Library was re-located as part of the Grace District public-private initiative that will revitalize the
downtown Wilmington block bounded by Chestnut, Grace, Second, and Third Streets, reimagining the site as a
modern, mixed-use civic hub. At its core, a new state-of-the-art facility will co-locate the Main Library and the Cape
Fear Museum of History and Science creating a destination for learning, exploration, and community engagement in
the heart of Wilmington.
Cape Fear Museum of History and Science
Cape Fear Museum of History and Science is transitioning to its new facility located in downtown Wilmington on
Grace Street, with plans to open in summer 2026. Its mission is to inspire and engage visitors with the history,
science, and cultures of the Lower Cape Fear. The region is an area spanning roughly 50 miles around Wilmington
and includes New Hanover, Brunswick, and Pender Counties. The museum’s collection will include more than
51
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 61
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
59,000 objects and over 15,000 photographic images, many of which are currently accessible through its online
catalog.
Among its notable permanent exhibitions will be Cape Fear Stories, an interactive gallery spanning two floors that
delves into the rich history of the Lower Cape Fear; Port City Play, an imaginative playspace with interactive displays
tailored to young children and their caregivers; Science Matters, a hands-on exhibit gallery that emphasizes the
importance of science in understanding and changing the world; Curious Nature, an outdoor gallery that highlights
the beauty of nature and encourages environmental stewardship; and a striking replica skeleton of a giant ground
sloth, a visitor favorite from the Market Street location that bridges science and storytelling. The Museum will also
feature a 60-seat immersive Planetarium and a 5,000 square foot traveling exhibition gallery to host a variety of
engaging exhibits that rotate regularly. Together, these exhibits will create a dynamic educational experience that
connects the area’s natural and human heritage.
As part of the Museum’s expansion, the existing building and park at Market Street will remain operational. This
space will function as a dedicated research facility, exhibition design and fabrication workshop, and collections
management complex. The building will continue to be staffed to support ongoing collections stewardship,
exhibition development, and educational initiatives.
Beyond its permanent displays, Cape Fear Museum also engages the community through temporary exhibits,
educational programs, and public discussions that explore both the region’s past and its evolving present.
New Hanover County Arboretum & North Carolina Cooperative Extension
The New Hanover County Arboretum, is a seven-acre public garden operated by the North Carolina Cooperative
Extension since 1989. It serves as a living laboratory for horticultural education, research, and environmental
stewardship. It offers an accessible place to learn about sustainable landscaping, native and adaptive plants, and
coastal gardening, advancing sound environmental management through demonstration gardens, public
workshops, and youth education.
Designed for the coastal environment, the grounds include a Japanese garden with koi ponds and stone bridges, a
butterfly garden, a children’s garden with interactive exhibits, and displays of azaleas, camellias, roses, and native
trees. Each garden models best practices in water conservation, soil health, and habitat creation. Beyond its beauty,
the Arboretum anchors community engagement through Master Gardener volunteer programs, horticultural
therapy, seasonal plant sales, environmental workshops, and collaborations with local schools and organizations,
which reflects the county’s commitment to sustainability, education, and coastal biodiversity.
The North Carolina Cooperative Extension a partnership of NC State University, NC A&T State University, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, and county governments, connects university research to community needs through
practical outreach. With offices statewide, including New Hanover County, it offers programs in agriculture,
horticulture, family and consumer sciences, 4-H youth development, and community resource development.
Locally, the Extension operates the Arboretum and provides soil testing, gardening education, nutrition programs,
and youth leadership opportunities that promote sustainability, health, and community resilience.
Collectively, the Arboretum and Cooperative Extension translate cutting-edge research into hands-on learning and
everyday stewardship, which gives residents practical skills, beautiful public spaces, and programs that build
community resilience. By modeling water-wise, habitat-friendly landscapes and offering education from youth to
52
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 62
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
seniors, the Arboretum and Cooperative Extension strengthen environmental health, support local food and
gardening, and nurture the next generation of coastal caretakers. The result is a thriving, informed community
better equipped to sustain New Hanover County’s unique natural heritage.
New Hanover County Soil and Water Conservation District
The New Hanover Soil and Water Conservation District is a local government agency dedicated to protecting and
enhancing the county’s natural resources through education, technical assistance, and community partnerships.
Established by the State of North Carolina General Statute (Chapter 139), the district works closely with landowners,
farmers, and public agencies to promote responsible land use practices that conserve soil, improve water quality,
sustain agricultural productivity, and stewardship of any land for continued use. Its programs are guided by a five-
member Board of Supervisors, which includes both elected and appointed members who provide leadership and
policy direction for conservation efforts across the county.
Through voluntary, incentive-based programs, the district assists property owners with implementing best
management practices that reduce erosion, manage stormwater, and protect sensitive ecosystems such as
wetlands and tidal creeks. It administers cost-share programs through the North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share
Program and the Community Conservation Assistance Program, helping to fund projects like rain gardens,
vegetative buffers, and stormwater infiltration systems. These efforts play an essential role in protecting the
county’s waterways, including the Cape Fear River and Intracoastal Waterway by reducing sedimentation, nutrient
runoff, and other pollutants that threaten local water quality and habitats. Also, the district offers local programs
through city and county funds that provide the same benefits.
In addition to on-the-ground conservation, the district is committed to education and public outreach. It sponsors
youth programs such as the Resource Conservation Workshop, Envirothon competitions, and school-based
conservation contests and school gardens that build environmental awareness among students. Furthermore, the
district partners with community organizations, local governments, and agencies to support long-term sustainability
initiatives
The programs offered by New Hanover Soil and Water Conservation District operates as a catalyst for healthier land
and cleaner water countywide. Pairing voluntary, cost-share assistance with best management practices and robust
youth education; the district reduces erosion and polluted runoff, protects wetlands and tidal creeks, and supports
productive, resilient landscapes. Guided by an engaged Board and strong partnerships, it delivers lasting
conservation benefits for residents, farms, and waterways from neighborhood rain gardens to the Cape Fear River
and Intracoastal Waterway..
53
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 63
County Community Services
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Map 1.15 County Services
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
54
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 64
Education
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Education
A strong education system is
foundational to long-term
community well-being. High
educational attainment contributes
to a skilled workforce, attracts
employers, supports innovation and
entrepreneurship, and strengthens
civic engagement. Research
consistently shows that
communities with higher levels of
education experience better public
health outcomes, lower crime rates,
and greater resilience as they adapt
to economic, environmental, and
technological change. In New
Hanover County, education, from
early childhood through
postsecondary and workforce
training, is a key driver of the
community’s prosperity.
New Hanover County has a significantly more educated adult population than either North Carolina or the United
States as a whole. More than 54% of residents hold an associate’s, bachelor’s, or graduate degree, which is roughly
ten percentage points above state and national averages.
The county has a higher share of residents with bachelor’s degrees and maintains similarly strong levels of graduate
or professional degrees. At the same time, it has smaller proportions of adults with lower educational attainment,
such as those without a high school diploma or those with some college but no degree.
This profile shows a community with a strong baseline of educational achievement, an asset that supports high-
value industries, attracts skilled workers, and contributes to the county’s long-term economic competitiveness. It
also reflects the impact of the two higher education institutions located in the county, namely the University of
North Carolina Wilmington (UNCW) and Cape Fear Community College (CFCC). UNCW is a nationally recognized
research university that attracts students and professionals from across the country, and CFCC delivers workforce
training, technical education, and transfer degree pathways important for the region’s economic development.
New Hanover County Schools (NHCS), and New Hanover County Government maintain a close working relationship,
as the county is responsible for funding public school capital needs. NHCS and the county collaborate annually to
analyze student yields associated with residential development. This information helps the county estimate the
potential impact of rezoning proposals and future land use changes on school capacity.
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%
Less than 9th grade
9th to 12th grade, no diploma
High School graduate
Some college, no degree
Associate's degree
Bachelor's degree
Graduate or professional degree
United States North Carolina New Hanover County
Figure 1.39 Education Attainment by Percentage of
Population Ages 25 and Older
Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-year estimates 2022
55
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 65
Education
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Generation rates have remained relatively
steady for the past five years, but enrollment
fluctuations are increasingly influenced by
broader demographic patterns rather than
new construction alone. The most
significant enrollment shift occurred from
2020-2021 to 2021-2022, when district
membership declined by 1,705 students.
Areas experiencing substantial growth in
new housing did not always see
corresponding increases in student
numbers, highlighting the growing
importance of housing turnover, aging
households, and migration patterns as
drivers of student enrollment. This is
echoed by the 2023 NHCS Demographic
Study, which indicated that the rate, price,
and volume of existing home sales will have
an increasingly significant impact on school
populations. This study also found that
elementary school enrollment was expected
to grow modestly over the next decade, and
district-wide enrollment is was projected to
decline slightly through 2027-2028 before
growing by about 529 students through
2032-2033.
Overall, NHCS operated at 86% of
elementary, 91% of middle school and 95% of
high school capacity during the 2024-2025 school year. This information is based on the 2025-2026 NHCS student
population projections and programmatic capacity with mobile classrooms. NHCS reports on student population
numbers and is available on the NHCS website. Several schools, including Bellamy Elementary, Ogden Elementary,
Porters Neck Elementary, Wrightsville Beach Elementary, Hoggard High, and Laney High, and Wilmington Early
College reported enrollment at or above programmatic capacity (100% or greater). NHCS has identified potential
needs for additional school facilities in the northeastern portion of the county where growth is anticipated to
continue; however, ongoing monitoring is essential as demographic changes may influence future capacity needs
more than new development alone.
In addition to the public school system, New Hanover County residents also have access to a range of charter and
private schools, providing families with educational choice and influencing enrollment distribution across the
county.
Map 1.16 New Hanover County Schools by Type
Source: NHC Schools 2025
56
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 66
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Environment & Natural Resources
The New Hanover County peninsula is bordered on
three sides by water: the Cape Fear River on the
west, Northeast Cape Fear River to the north and
the Atlantic Ocean on the east. Its coastal location
increases its vulnerability to hydrological hazards
such as hurricanes, floods, and storm surges.
Additionally, being at the end of the Cape Fear
watershed—the largest watershed in North
Carolina, spanning over 93,000 square miles—
makes the county particularly vulnerable to natural
hazards and water pollution. Contaminants that
enter the Cape Fear watershed eventually flow into
the surrounding waters before reaching the
Atlantic Ocean.
With numerous creeks, streams and wetlands, NHC
is a diverse place with a wide range of ecosystems
and habitats that are home to a variety of wildlife
and plant species including the longleaf pine tree,
southern live oak, Venus flytrap and carnivorous
pitcher plants.
Water and Watersheds
A large portion, 17% or 24,000 acres of New
Hanover County is water, which includes major water bodies,
such as the Cape Fear River and Northeast Cape Fear River and
smaller creeks. Many inlets, streams, ponds, lakes and tidal marshes, along with wetland areas, are also located in
the county and provide numerous opportunities for recreation, support unique habitats and a rich variety of plant
and animal life, and contribute to a complex and vibrant ecosystem.
Recreational Water Quality
One of the county’s most treasured assets is its coastal environment. Proximity to coastal waters means more than
scenic views and opportunities for boating, swimming and sunbathing; it fuels a vibrant economy from fishing,
shellfishing to charters, seafood markets and services that support the local community. Because of its vital
importance, water quality remains a longstanding priority in New Hanover County, recognized at both the state and
local levels as essential to environmental health, public safety, and community resilience. For the past 18 years New
Hanover County in partnership with Coastal Protection Engineering of North Carolina, LLC. has conducted regular
water quality monitoring at 20 monitoring stations across 8 creeks namely, Barnards Creek, Futch Creek, Island
Creek, Lords Creek, Motts Creek, Pages Creek, Prince Georges Creek and Smith Creek (see Map 1.16).
Map 1.17 New Hanover County Watersheds
Source: NHC Engineering Department 2020
57
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 67
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Each year, the results are shared in a Water Quality Monitoring Report, which is presented to the Board of
Commissioners. All presentations and annual reports are hosted on the county’ website.
While the New Hanover County Water Quality Monitoring Program focuses on tracking trends in key water quality
parameters, other departments, including Health and Human Services, Engineering, Soil and Water Conservation,
and Sustainability contribute to efforts that collectively enhance watershed health. Countywide initiatives include
property acquisition for conservation; installation of stormwater control measures (SCM) or low impact design
strategies, such as rain gardens and infiltration basins; microbial source tracking; public outreach and education;
watershed planning; and drainage improvement projects. These efforts are strengthened through ongoing
collaboration with the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA), the University of North Carolina Wilmington
(UNCW), the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), and the City of Wilmington, reflecting a
shared commitment to protecting and improving local water resources.
This serves to keep the public informed and supports decisions on how to protect and improve local waters.
The 303(d) List of Impaired and Threatened Waters
The 303(d) List refers to a section of the Clean Water Act (Section 303(d)) that requires each state to identify surface
waters such as rivers, streams, lakes, and estuaries which do not meet established water quality standards, even
after pollution control technologies have been applied. These waters are considered impaired or threatened.
States must assess their waters and submit an updated 303(d) list to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) every two years. Each listed waterbody must have the specific pollutants identified that are causing
impairment such as nutrients, sediment, bacteria, mercury, or low dissolved oxygen and the designated uses that
are affected, including recreation, aquatic life, or drinking water.
For every impaired waterbody on the list, states must develop a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), a calculation of
the maximum amount of a pollutant that the waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards. The
TMDL process guides restoration and management strategies to bring waters back into compliance.
On the Cape Fear River side impairments range from low dissolved oxygen, chemicals and metals and on the
Intracoastal side the majority of coastal waters are closed to shellfishing due to elevated levels of fecal bacteria. The
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality reassesses waters on the impaired waters list every two years. More
information about impaired waters and the State Water Quality Data Assessment can be found on the N.C. DEQ
Division of Water Resource’s website.
Local Context: New Hanover County & the Cape Fear River Basin
New Hanover County lies within the Cape Fear River Basin, which the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NC DEQ) identifies as containing many impaired streams and waterbodies. The basin-wide water quality
plan notes that over 475 freshwater miles of river have been listed as impaired within the basin at various times.
Impairments in this region often stem from non-point source pollution, including urban development, stormwater
runoff, sediment loading, and habitat degradation.
Water quality monitoring is critical for the protection of ecosystems, safeguarding public health, supporting
economic activities, tracking environmental change, identifying emerging trends and threats related to urban
development, climate change, activities and informing policy and planning.
58
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 68
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Implications for New Hanover County
While New Hanover County falls within a basin with many impaired waterways and local planning and land use
policies may not always impact the full scope of water quality concerns, local planning can assist in mitigating
impacts and reducing local contributions to poor water quality. Comprehensive Plan strategies that emphasize
stormwater management, green infrastructure, and natural buffer preservation can help reduce pollution entering
into the creeks and improve overall watershed health.
Incorporating mapping and tracking of impaired versus unimpaired streams will help the county prioritize
restoration efforts. Additionally, coordination with state and regional partners on TMDL implementation and
watershed planning can align local actions with broader water quality goals
Map 1.18 303d Impaired Waters
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
Map 1.19 Shellfish Closure Areas
Source: .N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
59
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 69
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Air Quality
Air quality is a critical component of environmental and public health, influencing everything from respiratory
wellness to ecosystem stability. Poor air quality has wide-ranging implications on human health, ecological health,
and climate resilience. Elevated levels of ozone and particulate matter are linked to asthma, chronic bronchitis,
emphysema, and cardiovascular disease. Vulnerable populations such as children, older adults, and individuals
with pre-existing conditions are especially at risk. Airborne pollutants can also damage plant tissues, reduce
biodiversity, and impair photosynthesis. Particulate matter can settle into soil and waterways, disrupting nutrient
cycles and aquatic ecosystems. Poor air quality can compound the effects of climate change by weakening natural
systems that help regulate temperature, sequester carbon, and manage stormwater.
In New Hanover County, air quality is not monitored directly through a local network of sensors. Instead, the county
relies on data provided by AirNow, a nationally recognized platform managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) in partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Park
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and various state, tribal,
and local agencies.
AirNow tracks three primary pollutants that serve as indicators of overall air quality:
• Ozone (O₃) - A reactive gas that forms when sunlight interacts with pollutants from vehicles and industrial
sources.
• Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM₂.₅) - Fine inhalable particles with diameters of 2.5 micrometers or smaller, often
produced by combustion, wildfires, and industrial activity.
• Particulate Matter 10 (PM₁₀) - Larger particles that include dust, pollen, and mold, which can also be generated
by construction and land clearing.
Recent Trends and Emerging Concerns
Over the past five years, New Hanover County has experienced a notable increase in PM₂.₅ concentrations, while O₃
and PM₁₀ levels have shown only marginal growth. This trend is consistent with broader regional and national
patterns, where increased wildfire activity, vehicle emissions, and open burning practices contribute to elevated
particulate pollution.
Open burning remains a widely used method for clearing vegetation during site preparation for development in
New Hanover County. While it is a cost-effective and expedient practice, it raises significant concerns related to air
quality, ecological health, public safety, and community well-being. At present, developers in New Hanover County
are required to secure all necessary land disturbance and tree removal permits before initiating land clearing. To
conduct open burning, they must obtain a burn permit through the North Carolina Forestry Service’s online system.
These permits are automatically issued unless a statewide burn ban is in effect. Notably, there is no requirement for
on-site inspections by either the Forestry Service or county staff, and the process is largely governed by state-level
regulations.
This limited oversight can result in inconsistent compliance with best practices, particularly in areas near residential
neighborhoods or environmentally sensitive lands. The lack of local enforcement mechanisms also makes it difficult
to respond to citizen complaints or mitigate the cumulative impacts of multiple burns occurring simultaneously.
60
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 70
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
These changes are particularly concerning given the county’s growing population and development activity, which
can exacerbate emissions and reduce vegetative buffers that naturally filter air pollutants.
Planning Implications and Opportunities
As New Hanover County continues to grow, integrating air quality considerations into long-range planning is
essential. This includes:
In January 2025, the Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution brought forward by
Fire Rescue to begin the process of requesting that the unincorporated county receive a High Hazard
Classification from the state, a method of increasing oversight over open burning.
Coordinating with state and federal
agencies
Coordinating with state and federal agencies
to improve access to localized air quality data.
Exploring opportunities for local
monitoring
Exploring opportunities for local monitoring
in high-risk or high-growth areas.
Incorporating air quality metrics
Incorporating air quality metrics into land
use, transportation, and environmental
planning decisions.
Educating the public
Educating the public about air quality risks
and mitigation strategies, especially during
high-pollution events.
61
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 71
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Natural Systems and Hazards
Tropical Storms and Hurricanes
Since 1821, New Hanover County has
documented 24 tropical storms, including
hurricanes, that have crossed directly
through the county, with many more
passing close enough to bring heavy wind
and rain. Such events like Hurricane
Florence in 2018 that brought widespread
flooding has increased the county’s focus
on flood risk reduction and preparation for
future storm events.
Storms along the North Carolina coast and
throughout the Southeastern United States
are becoming more intense and more
disruptive. Scientific research and recent
experience show that hurricanes and other
major weather events are not only
happening more frequently, but they are
also bringing heavier rainfall, stronger
winds, and greater risks to coastal
communities like Wilmington. One of the
most noticeable changes is the increasing
strength of hurricanes. Warmer ocean
temperatures are fueling storms that
intensify more quickly and reach higher wind speeds than in the past. This
rapid intensification can make it harder for communities to prepare,
especially when storms strengthen just before landfall. At the same time,
these storms are producing more rainfall. Warmer air holds more moisture, which means that when storms arrive,
they often bring extreme downpours that can overwhelm drainage systems and cause widespread flooding.
New Hanover County works year-round to prepare for these events through the Emergency Management
Department, which focuses on building a resilient community and keeping residents and visitors safe. Resources
such as ReadyNHC, preparedness guides, and information from local and federal agencies, including the
Southeastern North Carolina Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan are available on the Emergency Management website
to help the public stay informed and ready. Other county services also help prepare the community for storm
events, for instance the Stormwater Services Program works toward the continued upkeep of public drainage
infrastructure throughout the unincorporated areas of New Hanover County in an effort to reduce the risk of
flooding and prompt drainage conveyance to the creeks and rivers.
Map 1.20 Tropical Storm Tracks
.Source: U.S. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration 2025
62
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 72
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Flood Hazards
Records from National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) show that between 2015 and
2024, New Hanover County experienced more annual
flood days or days when there is flooding above 1.83
feet above mean high high water than any period
since 1980. This data comes from the monitoring
station along the Cape Fear River and reflects
flooding only at that location. However, past severe
weather events confirm flooding has also occurred in
other parts of the county, many of which are already
designated as mapped flood zones.
To reduce risks and impacts, New Hanover County
participates in both the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) and the Community Rating System.
Since 1978, the county has regulated development
within Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) as part of
NFIP compliance. These FEMA-prepared maps are
widely available on government websites that show
the flood zones most residents are familiar with.
In New Hanover County, the primary SFHA zones are
AE, AE floodway, and VE:
AE Flood Zones: Have a 1% annual chance of flooding
and a 26% chance over a 30-year mortgage. They
include an established base flood elevation.
VE Flood Zones: Carry the same flood risk as AE zones but with added velocity hazards from wave action.
While some areas have lower flood probabilities (such as the 0.2% chance zones), all development in flood-prone
areas should account for potential risks.
Most AE zones lie along the Cape Fear River in the county’s southwest and northeast, along inlet banks, major
streams, and the back sides of the barrier island beach towns (Wrightsville Beach, Figure Eight Island, Carolina
Beach, and Kure Beach). VE zones are concentrated on the ocean-facing sides of the barrier islands and in tidal
marshes along the Intracoastal Waterway.
Before 2022, detailed flood mapping was unavailable in parts of New Hanover County, particularly in the northern
watersheds, due to high mapping costs, sparse development, and a minimized perception of flood risk. As these
areas transitioned from low density residential, agricultural and timberland to higher density residential and
commercial development, the existing gaps in flood data necessitated more detailed analysis to better understand
risks, to guide mitigation efforts and inform regulatory decisions.
Map 1.21 Special Flood Hazard Areas
Source: N.C. Flood Risk Information System 2024
63
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 73
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Subsequently, the county partnered with ESP Associates, Inc. and completed a flood mapping study which focused
on the northern areas of the county which were not designated as Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on current
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). Although residents in these areas are likely to face similar flood risks due
to their proximity to local streams, awareness of these risks allows them to plan and prepare accordingly. The full
Northern Watersheds Flood Mapping Project report can be found in the Appendix section of this plan. Updated
floodplain mapping is essential to support land use planning, transportation and infrastructure design, water
resource management, environmental assessments, and the development of comprehensive plans. By improving
the accuracy of flood risk information, stakeholders will be better equipped to make informed decisions that protect
both the community and its resources.
Map 1.22 Flood Advisory Areas
Source: Northern Watersheds Flood Mapping Project, NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
64
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 74
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Sea Level Rise
Measurements of sea level in New Hanover County
date back to 1935, taken from a monitoring station
on the Cape Fear River off Battleship Road near the
Cape Fear Memorial Bridge. In Wilmington, the sea
has risen nearly a foot since 1950. This means that
even moderate storms can now cause more severe
coastal flooding and storm surge. As a result, areas
that were not inundated during past hurricanes may
now be at risk. These changes are not isolated
events. Across the Southeast, the number of billion-
dollar weather disasters has increased significantly
in recent years. What used to be rare, high-impact
storms are now occurring more often, placing
greater strain on infrastructure, emergency services,
and local economies. These changes are not isolated
events. Across the Southeast, the number of billion-
dollar weather disasters has increased significantly
in recent years. What used to be rare, high-impact
storms are now occurring more often, placing
greater strain on infrastructure, emergency services,
and local economies.
For New Hanover County, understanding these
trends is essential. As the region plans, it will be
increasingly important to design infrastructure,
transportation systems, and land use policies that
reflect the reality of a changing climate. Preparing for stronger storms and higher water levels is not just about
protecting property, it’s about ensuring the long-term safety, resilience, and livability of the community
Sea level change is not uniform worldwide. Some regions are experiencing falling sea levels due to land rising from
tectonic activity, namely Alaska, British Columbia, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. However, New Hanover County sits
on a unique geological feature known as the Cape Fear Arch, where slow land uplift has tempered the rate of sea
level rise compared to the Outer Banks or Myrtle Beach, which are seeing faster increases in sea level. Because the
pace of land rise is slower than the rate of sea level, the county must continue to prioritize resiliency planning,
particularly in low-lying areas vulnerable to coastal flooding and storm surge. In these areas, sea level rise
compounds flooding risks and increases potential damage.
Map 1.23 National Sea Level Rise Predictions
Source: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2023
65
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 75
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Tidal Creek Flooding
Tidal creek flooding in New Hanover County is a growing concern linked to sea level rise, intensifying storms, and
changes in rainfall patterns. These low-lying coastal waterways, which serve as important drainage systems for
inland areas, are experiencing higher water levels and longer flood durations, particularly during high tides and
storm events. Communities adjacent to tidal creeks face increased risks of property damage, erosion, and
infrastructure impacts.
Flooding in tidal creeks occurs when elevated tides coincide with heavy rainfall or when storm surges push
saltwater upstream, reducing the capacity for stormwater to drain effectively. This backflow effect often leads to
inundation of roads, yards, and septic systems. As development continues within flood-prone zones, impervious
surfaces compound runoff challenges, further straining the drainage network.
Local and regional planning efforts are focusing on enhancing resilience through improved stormwater
infrastructure, wetland restoration, and land use strategies that limit impervious cover. New Hanover County’s
comprehensive planning framework emphasizes the integration of natural systems into flood mitigation and
adaptation strategies. Monitoring, modeling, and interagency coordination are key to managing tidal creek flooding
and protecting the ecological and community health of these sensitive coastal systems.
Storm Surge
Storm surge is a significant hazard in New Hanover County due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. The National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) defines storm surge as “an abnormal rise of water generated by a
storm, over and above the predicted astronomical tides.” While many factors influence its intensity, storm surge is
primarily driven by strong winds pushing water toward the shore. Generally, more powerful storms create more
severe surges. The impacts can range from minor beach erosion to the destruction of homes, businesses, and
major infrastructure. Populations most at risk include Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, and Figure
Eight Island. Although the barrier islands offer some protection, areas near the Intracoastal Waterway, inlets, and
the Cape Fear River remain highly vulnerable to surge-related flooding.
66
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 76
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Erosion
New Hanover County experiences four general types of erosion: coastal erosion, tidal creek erosion, inland
estuarine erosion, and erosion from development sites.
Coastal Erosion
Coastal erosion occurs on barrier islands and can happen gradually or rapidly due to natural forces. Slow erosion
results from the rise and fall of tides and long-term sediment migration, while storms can cause sudden and severe
erosion. This process threatens both natural and social resources, including the beaches that attract residents,
tourists, and businesses.
To protect the economy, tourism industry, tax base, and public and private coastal infrastructure, the county
partners with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers established three Coastal Storm Risk Management Projects at
Wrightsville Beach, Carolina Beach, and Kure Beach. These projects involve periodic sand placement:
• Wrightsville Beach – sand typically pumped from an inlet source every four years.
• Carolina Beach – sand typically pumped from an inlet source every three years.
• Kure Beach – sand typically pumped from an offshore borrow site every three years.
Funding is shared. Both Wrightsville Beach and Kure Beach funding is 65% federal and 35% non-federal, and
Carolina Beach’s funding is 50% federal and 50% non-federal. The state and the local room occupancy tax each
contribute half of the local share. Maintaining these projects is essential to sustaining New Hanover County’s
beaches, economy, and quality of life.
Inland and Tidal Creek Erosion
Erosion along creeks and streams varies with rainfall. Heavy or prolonged precipitation accelerates bank erosion,
increasing turbidity and degrading water quality. Urban development exacerbates erosion by increasing impervious
surfaces, which generate greater water runoff, accelerate stormwater flow, and induce "flashiness" in streams—a
propensity for rapid fluctuations in water levels following precipitation events.
Construction sites act similarly, as exposed soil is more susceptible to erosion and sediment transport. Storm
events wash sediment into waterways, harming aquatic ecosystems. Permeable surfaces, in contrast, help reduce
runoff by allowing infiltration into the ground.
Development Site Erosion
The New Hanover County Engineering Department regulates erosion and sedimentation control for development
within both the unincorporated county and the City of Wilmington. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a
land-disturbing permit under the county’s Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and state rules. Typical
practices include silt fencing and other measures to prevent sediment from entering streams.
67
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 77
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Wetlands
Wetlands are generally described as areas
where water covers the soil or is present at or
near the surface. Wetlands provide habitats
for both aquatic and terrestrial species and
can vary greatly depending on the underlying
soils, topography, climate, hydrology and
vegetation. Coastal wetlands, such as the ones
found in New Hanover County, provide
natural habitats for many unique plant and
animal species. Wetlands act as natural
barriers and can mitigate the effects of storm
surge, erosion and flooding during heavy rain
events and tropical storms like hurricanes.
They also function as natural filtration systems
that are critical to surface water quality. In
addition to their ecological value, wetlands
offer recreational and educational
opportunities and support local economies
through fishing and eco-tourism industries.
New Hanover County hosts different types of
wetlands, including freshwater emergent,
forested/shrub, estuarine and marine, which
account for approximately 35,000 acres (24%)
of the total land and water area. Wetlands are
extremely sensitive and can be altered by the
slightest amount of human influence and
shifts in typical weather patterns.
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) and its Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center are
responsible for maintaining and updating the National Land Cover Database (NLCD). This resource is valuable for
identifying natural features such as wetlands. In 2016, wetlands accounted for roughly 27% of New Hanover
County’s total land and water area. Since then, the county has experienced an estimated 2% decline. According to
the 2024 NLCD update, wetlands now make up about 26.5% of the county’s total area, including the City of
Wilmington and the beach municipalities.
Much of New Hanover County’s wetlands are concentrated in tidal marshes located between the barrier islands and
the Intracoastal Waterway. Additional large wetland areas are found along the Northeast Cape Fear River in the
county’s northwest section and along the Cape Fear River near Sutton Lake. Because of the county’s coastal location
and low elevation, smaller pockets of wetlands are scattered inland, most notably around the I-140 corridor and
Greenview Ranches.
Map 1.24 Coastal Wetlands
Source: N.C. DEQ Division of Coastal Management 1999
68
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 78
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Soils
Soils in New Hanover County vary widely and play a critical role in determining development potential. Soil types
differ by location, with some being unique to the coastal plain while others are more regionally distributed. For
example, soils found in New Hanover County are similar to those in surrounding coastal communities but are not
present further inland. Conversely, soils characteristic of the Appalachian region do not occur in the coastal plain.
Information about soils and their characteristics is provided by the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS), a
public–private partnership of federal, state, and local entities that oversees all soil survey activities for the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
One of the most important considerations for local soils is their suitability for septic tank systems. In 1980, New
Hanover County released a Soil Classification Report that established a system for evaluating soils based on their
capacity to support septic systems. This report outlines the classification system and details the physical and
economic limitations associated with each soil class. The classification ranges from Class 1 to Class 4, with Class 1
soils are suitable or have only slight limitations and Class 4 soils are determined as unsuitable and generally not
economically feasible or environmentally desirable for septic use.
As shown in Map 1.25, the largest
unsegmented areas with the highest soil
suitability ratings are located in the Porters
Neck area in the northeast corner of county
adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway,
along the Highway 421 Corridor, and south
of Sanders Road in the Beau Rivage
neighborhood. The largest unsegmented
areas of Class 2 soils are found in the
central northeastern section of the county,
north of the Wilmington city limits. The
majority of soils in the county fall within the
less suitable Class 3 designation. The least
suitable Class 4 soils are concentrated
along the Northeast Cape Fear River
corridor, within the marshlands of the
Intracoastal Waterway, and along stream
and river segments.
Map 1.25 Soil
Classifications
Source: N.C. Department of
Agriculture and Department of
Environmental Quality 2024
69
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 79
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Farmland Soils
The data used to evaluate soil suitability for septic
systems is also applied in rating agricultural lands.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) classify soils into five categories: prime
farmland, farmland of statewide importance,
farmland of unique importance, prime farmland if
drained, and not prime farmland. Prime farmland
is defined as land with the best combination of
physical and chemical characteristics for
producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed
crops. In addition to soil, factors such as growing
season, climate, water supply, permeability,
erosion, and flood risk are also important in
delineating farmland classifications.
Areas designated as “Prime” farmland are
scattered throughout New Hanover County, with
some of the largest contiguous tracts located in
Castle Hayne east of Castle Hayne Road and in
Wrightsboro. However, the majority of farmland
in the county is classified as farmland of unique
importance. These areas possess a special
combination of characteristics that make them
capable of producing high yields of specific crops.
In New Hanover County, this designation primarily
applies to land suitable for blueberry cultivation.
Most of the farmland of unique importance is
currently wetlands, which remain in their natural
state and are protected by law. The largest
undeveloped tracts with this classification are
found in the northeastern portion of the county,
particularly around Greenview Ranches, the I-140
corridor, and Sidbury Road.
Map 1.26 Farmland Classifications
Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2025
70
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 80
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Tree Canopy
New Hanover County has regulated tree
retention in unincorporated areas since 1985
through zoning and development ordinances.
These regulations reflect the county’s
commitment to protecting and maintaining a
tree canopy that is both a distinctive
community feature and a vital natural
resource. Beyond their aesthetic value, trees
improve air and water quality, provide shade,
reduce energy costs, and enhance property
values.
In 2024, the county partnered with PlanItGeo,
Inc. to complete a tree canopy assessment.
The study measured canopy coverage and
other land cover types for 2022 and analyzed
changes from 2014 to 2022. To make the
technical findings more accessible, Planning
staff prepared a companion report
summarizing the assessment, outlining the
county’s regulatory history, and identifying
opportunities to strengthen canopy retention.
The report presents potential strategies for
sustaining and expanding tree cover. The full
Tree Canopy Report can be found in the
Technical Report section of this plan. Goals
and objectives related to tree canopy
retention are provided in Chapter 5 of this plan.
Map 1.27 NHC Tree Canopy Assessment
Source: NHC Tree Canopy Assessment, NHC Planning &
Land Use 2022
71
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 81
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Commitment to Land Conservation and Environmental Stewardship
Over the years, New Hanover County has acquired several properties in the unincorporated area for conservation
purposes. One of the most notable is Airlie Gardens, a 67-acre site purchased from the Corbett family to serve as an
important buffer along Bradley Creek. Today, Airlie Gardens functions as both an outdoor laboratory and
educational resource, featuring a mix of formal gardens and walking trails.
In 2001, the county purchased a 0.75-acre tract on Howe Creek, off Middle Sound Loop Road, using funds from the
Clean Water Management Trust Fund. This site remains one of the few undeveloped parcels along the northern
shoreline. Between 2001 and 2003, the Trust Fund supported the purchase of four additional properties:
• Dobo Property -16.5 acres, in the Hewlett’s Creek watershed
• Peterson Property - 17.35 acres, in the Pages Creek watershed
• Skipper Property - 13.43 acres, on Foys Creek in the Futch Creek watershed
• Duckhaven Property -10.01 acres, adjacent to Autumn Hall in the Bradley Creek watershed
The county has benefited from land donations. In 2007, the Smith Property (14 acres) along Smith Creek was
donated to help establish a continuous conservation easement. That same year, two additional donations totaling
41 acres were added, furthering the effort to create a protected corridor along Smith Creek.
In 2017 the county acquired a 5-acre tract adjacent to the Peterson Property. Combined, these holdings form the
Pages Creek Preserve, which provides improved access to county-owned land and serves as a passive park that
protects the natural landscape while offering recreation opportunities for the public.
In 2025 the county acquired 60 acres of land within the City of Wilmington off Independence Boulevard. Acquisition
of this land, known as the Bryan Tract, supports the county goal of preserving greenspace and aligns with the
county’s Strategic Plan focus on sustainable land use and environmental stewardship. The Board of Commissioners
most recently approved (December 2025) a purchase of three parcels totaling approximately 28.55 acres along the
northern portion of the Western Bank across from downtown Wilmington, subject to the completion of satisfactory
due diligence. This land was included in the Riverfront Conservation classification amendment to the 2016
Comprehensive Plan adopted in October 2024. The Riverfront Conservation place type outlined a vision to conserve
property along the Western Bank, maintain its current condition, and reduce land use intensity through brownfields
mitigation or conservation acquisition.
72
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 82
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Biodiversity and Natural Habitat
Communities
New Hanover County’s diverse landscape
supports a wide range of plant and animal
species many of which are protected under
the federal and state Endangered Species Act.
To guide conservation of these sensitive
ecosystems, the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program developed the Biodiversity
and Habitat Assessment, which identifies and
prioritizes areas important for maintaining
healthy, sustainable ecosystems.
Natural Heritage Areas in New Hanover
County are evaluated using a standardized
methodology developed by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program to assess
their ecological significance and conservation
value. This approach considers both the
quality of individual natural resources and the
overall concentration of rare or high-value
resources within a site. Each documented
occurrence of a rare species or high-quality
natural community is assigned a score based
on its rarity, condition, and importance at the
state or global level. These scores are then
combined to reflect a site’s overall ecological
value, while additional consideration is given to
whether the site contains some of the best remaining examples of particularly rare or sensitive resources in North
Carolina. Together, this scoring system provides a consistent, science-based framework to identify priority natural
areas and inform long-range planning, conservation strategies, and land-use decision-making
Results are displayed on a map that provides a relative conservation value to help direct statewide and local
conservation efforts. The county’s biodiversity was first documented in the 2003 Natural Area Inventory of New
Hanover County by Richard LeBlond and Gilbert Grant and has since been updated through the Classification of
Natural Communities of North Carolina (Fourth Approximation) by Michael P. Schafale.
Map 1.28 Biodiversity and Significant Natural Habitat Areas
Source: N.C. Natural and Cultural Resources Natural Heritage Program 2024
73
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 83
Environmental & Natural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
According to the state’s assessment and the Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA), some of the highest-value
conservation areas in New Hanover County include:
• Coastal marshes along the Intracoastal Waterway and tidal creeks
• Areas adjacent to Smith Creek near the airport
• Land along the US 421 corridor
• Marshes along the Cape Fear River, including historic rice cultivation areas
• The northwest corner of the county within the Northeast Cape Fear River Floodplain
SNHAs were established under the Nature Preserves Act and represent the best existing examples of North
Carolina’s natural diversity. Sites are ranked by their conservation importance based on the presence of rare
species, high-quality natural communities, and special habitats.
Biodiversity is the variety and variability of
plant and animal species and their
habitats within a given area. It can be used
as a measure and guide to determining an
areas ecological importance and its worth
(in the form of conservation). These
resources, developed with input from
state agencies and nonprofit partners,
provide critical information for sustaining
the county’s ecological health.
New Hanover County’s rich mix of habitats
not only supports local wildlife but also
strengthens its role as a destination for
eco-tourism and outdoor education.
Map 1.29 Biodiversity Assessment
Source: N.C. Natural and Cultural Resources Natural Heritage Program 2024
74
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 84
Historical and Cultural Resources
Chapter 1 Existing Conditions
Historical and Cultural Resources
New Hanover County holds a rich cultural and historical legacy shaped by its coastal landscape, diverse
communities, and pivotal role in state and national history. As the county seat, Wilmington, has long served as a
hub of commerce, shipbuilding, and the arts, while surrounding communities maintain deep-rooted traditions in
fishing, farming, and maritime life. Landmark sites such as Fort Fisher, the Bellamy Mansion, and Thalian Hall
showcase the county’s military, architectural, and cultural legacy. The area’s identity is deeply influenced by African
American history, from the lasting significance of the 1898 Wilmington coup to the enduring presence of Gullah
Geechee culture along the coast. Distinct unincorporated areas further enrich this heritage, Castle Hayne for its
agricultural and nursery industries, Seabreeze as a historic African American beach community, and Scotts Hill for
its early settlements and maritime character. Together, these places, along with historic churches, 19th and early
20th-century neighborhoods, and rural sites offer a vivid portrait of New Hanover County’s past and continue to
shape its cultural identity today. Information about historic and cultural resources can be found on the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office’s website.
Map 1.30 Cultural and
Historical Resources
Source: N.C. Natural and
Cultural Resources 2025
75
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 85
This page has been left intentionally blank
76
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 86
Chapter 2: Public Engagement
Public input was central to the development of NHC Destination 2050 and directly informed the policy decisions
made by the Board of Commissioners. From residents, business owners, and the development community to
environmental advocates, technical experts, and regional partners, a wide range of voices shaped the plan’s
direction. Through this extensive engagement process, the community’s values, perspectives, and on-the-ground
knowledge are reflected in the goals, policies, and implementation strategies that will guide the county’s future.
77
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 87
78
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 88
Public Engagement Process
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Public Engagement Process
Between the summer of 2024 through spring of 2025, the public engagement campaign generated meaningful and
actionable input through more than 40 activities and events. These efforts, ranging from open houses and online
surveys to stakeholder interviews and mobile meetings, produced over 2,000 individual comments that helped
shape the plan.
The engagement strategy intentionally combined broad community outreach with targeted technical input.
Community-wide activities helped identify shared values and key concerns, while specialized interviews and focus
groups provided deeper insights into complex issues such as environmental resilience, infrastructure, and the
development process. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), composed of representatives from county
departments, planning organizations across the region, and partner agencies including Cape Fear Public Utility
Authority (CFPUA), met regularly to evaluate data and guide the plan’s technical components.
As the planning process advanced, engagement activities evolved to match each phase of work. Early efforts
centered on identifying the community’s priorities, challenges, and aspirations—findings that guided the Board of
Commissioners’ direction for the plan’s goals and framework. Later discussions focused on how the plan’s goals
could be implemented, and parties involved included area environmental consultants and past users of the county’s
Planned Development process. The final phase, launched in November 2025, invited public review of the full draft
plan ahead of formal adoption hearings before the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners.
Figure 2.1 NHC Destination 2050 Open House - August 2024
Source: NHC Communications Department 2024
79
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 89
Public Engagement
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Broad Public Engagement
The NHC Destination 2050 public engagement campaign
officially launched in August 2024 with an open house at the
New Hanover County Government Center. This event marked
the beginning of a nine-month outreach effort designed to
gather meaningful input from residents, raise awareness about
the planning process, and foster open dialogue between the
community and county staff.
Throughout the engagement process, the county used a mix of
in-person and online methods to reach people where they live,
work, and gather. Pop-up events, mobile meetings, library
connections, and online pulse surveys allowed residents to
share perspectives in informal, accessible settings, while public
festivals such as the Earth Day Festival, the Azalea Festival, and
the Festival Latino helped provide information on how to
participate to a broad audience. Although these open-format
methods captured a wide range of viewpoints, participation was
voluntary and not statistically representative. To balance
inclusivity with analytical rigor, the county partnered with the
Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory (SERL) at Virginia
Commonwealth University to conduct a demographically weighted, statistically valid phone survey, providing a
reliable snapshot of countywide sentiment.
This deliberate layering of engagement methods—pairing broad, qualitative participation with quantitative
validation—ensured that both lived experience and representative data informed the plan. Together, these
methods created a comprehensive foundation for data-informed decision-making and helped planners identify
shared priorities, validate emerging themes, and respond to community needs.
80
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 90
Public Engagement
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Targeted Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups
More than one-third of all engagement activities were dedicated to structured interviews and focus groups
designed to capture informed, sector-specific perspectives. Between 2024 and 2025, county staff conducted group
interviews with participants selected for their expertise and leadership in key areas such as housing, economic
development, environmental sustainability, and public health.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) played a dual role by both reviewing plan components and providing initial
input through structured group interviews. These discussions were organized by focus area (Infrastructure and
Technical Considerations, Quality of Life and Community Services, Regional Planning, and County Operations) to
ensure that input was focused and actionable.
Additional focus groups brought together representatives from organizations such as the Wilmington Chamber of
Commerce, Wilmington Area Homebuilders Association, NAACP, the New Hanover County Commission for Women,
and local environmental advocacy groups. These sessions provided valuable, context-rich insight into systemic
challenges, emerging trends, and opportunities for cross-sector collaboration.
Stakeholder Participants in Interviews and Focus Group
Chamber of Commerce
Wilmington Area Homebuilders Association
Business Alliance for a Sound Economy (BASE)
Environmental Stakeholders
Chamber of Commerce DEI Councils
Technical Advisory Committee
Soil & Water Conservation Board
NHC Department of Environmental Health
NHC Department of Environmental Health:
OSWP/Pool Team
NHC Building Safety Department
Commission for Women
Alliance for Cape Fear Trees
NC Sierra Club
NC Coastal Federation
Cape Fear River Watch
NAACP
Planned Development user group
Environmental engineers
Realtors Commercial Alliance (RCA)
New Hanover County and City of Wilmington
Community Relations
81
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 91
Public Engagement
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Core Engagement Mechanisms
Pulse Surveys
Pulse surveys were brief, online tools that allowed residents to quickly share
feedback on specific topics. Seven surveys, each with 5-25 questions,
gathered input on issues ranging from parks to housing, infrastructure, and
the environment. These surveys served as a flexible and accessible way to
capture real-time perspectives as the planning process evolved.
Interactive Engagement Activities
Public events such as open houses, mobile meetings, and community
festivals were designed to be interactive, approachable, and informative.
One of the most popular tools—the Resource Allocation Activity—invited
participants to distribute three tokens among policy areas such as
infrastructure, environment, housing, floodplain management, and the
economy to show where county resources should be dedicated. This exercise provided clear, visual insight into the
community’s collective priorities.
Mobile meetings extended the reach of engagement efforts, allowing staff to meet directly with neighborhoods and
community groups in the Scotts Hill area including Stephens Church Road and Creekwood Road communities, the
Veterans Park area, Rockhill Road and Chair Road communities, Castle Hayne, and Seabreeze. By engaging
residents in familiar settings, staff fostered trust, clarified questions in real time, and encouraged open conversation
about local issues.
Focus Group Interviews
Focus group interviews accounted for a significant share of engagement activities and provided detailed, technical
perspectives to complement broader public input. Staff were able to explore cross-cutting themes such as
infrastructure coordination, the relationship between housing and economic development, and environmental
stewardship.
Statistically Valid Survey
In February 2025, the New Hanover County Resident Survey (phone survey) —conducted by Virginia Commonwealth
University’s Survey & Evaluation Research Laboratory (SERL)—collected input from adults aged 18 and older across
the county. The survey addressed topics including environmental services, housing, infrastructure, and overall
quality of life. Results were adjusted through demographic weighting to accurately represent the county’s adult
population, providing a statistically valid counterpart to the qualitative insights gathered through other engagement
methods.
82
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 92
Engagement
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Key Findings from Public Engagement
The engagement process for NHC Destination 2050 revealed a community united by shared values and a desire for
responsible growth. Across all outreach activities—public events, stakeholder interviews, focus groups, and the
countywide survey—residents and partners emphasized the importance of planning for growth that protects the
environment, strengthens infrastructure, and maintains the character that defines New Hanover County.
More than 250 individuals participated in in-person events, contributing to a robust dataset reflecting both expert
insight and grassroots perspectives.
176 Green Sheets
Forms collected detailing
community input.
63 Virtual Open House Questionnaires
Surveys completed during online sessions.
882 Online Surveys
Digital questionnaires
submitted by participants.
Open House and Mobile Meetings
110 attendees participated in public information
sessions.
140 Focus Groups
Individuals engaged in in-depth
discussions.
250+ In-Person Participants
Individuals who joined various direct events.
83
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 93
Engagement
Chapter 2 Public Engagement
Aligning Growth with Infrastructure Capacity
Residents, stakeholders, and technical experts alike expressed the need for the pace of development to align with
public infrastructure. Traffic congestion, stormwater issues, and the lack of sidewalks, bike lanes, and safe road
connections were cited as everyday challenges. Participants called for growth management strategies that better
align land use decisions with infrastructure and service capacity, supported by stronger regional coordination and
long-term capital planning.
Protecting Environmental Resources and Community Character
Environmental stewardship emerged as one of the most consistent themes throughout the process. Participants
voiced strong opposition to tree loss and urged greater protection of wetlands, waterways, green spaces, and
wildlife habitats. Many residents described these natural areas as essential to the county’s identity and quality of
life. Stakeholders and technical experts emphasized the need for policy frameworks to integrate environmental
protection and resilience into development review and infrastructure design.
Expanding Housing Choice
The need for housing that serves a wide range of incomes and lifestyles was a recurring concern. Participants
supported more attainable and workforce housing options but cautioned that higher-density development should
be well-planned, context-sensitive, and supported by adequate infrastructure and services. Stakeholders
highlighted the importance of allowing a diversity of housing types while maintaining community character.
Fostering Collaboration and Long-Term Coordination
Technical experts and regional partners underscored the importance of aligning local and regional efforts to
manage growth, coordinate infrastructure investment, and share data. Participants noted that stronger
communication between jurisdictions, agencies, and the public will be critical to achieving the plan’s goals. Many
called for ongoing transparency and opportunities for residents to remain involved as NHC Destination 2050 is
implemented. These initiatives were acknowledged as essential within the context of the infrastructure and
development regulation framework for unincorporated areas in North Carolina, particularly considering the
significant development pressures and the limited available land for new projects.
Outcomes
Across all forms of engagement, a consistent message emerged: the community supports balanced, responsible
growth that aligns with infrastructure capacity, protects natural and cultural resources, expands housing
opportunities, and build resilience for the future. These areas of community consensus shaped the Board of
Commissioners decisions on guiding themes, goals, and strategies of NHC Destination 2050, ensuring that the plan
reflects both the community’s values and its vision for a sustainable and resilient New Hanover County.
The engagement process was more than a listening exercise; it created a foundation for evidence-based planning.
Community feedback, stakeholder expertise, and technical analysis were woven together to identify the most
pressing needs and most promising opportunities for New Hanover County’s future. The next chapter builds on
this foundation, illustrating how public perspectives and professional studies converged to shape the goals, policies,
and actions that define the county’s path forward.
84
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 94
Chapter 3: Framing the Policy
NHC Destination 2050 is New Hanover County’s 25-year framework for guiding growth, protecting natural and
cultural resources, and enhancing quality of life. It moves beyond a traditional land use plan to function as a living
document that can evolve as conditions change and new information emerges. Built on an integrated process of
engagement, technical analysis, and planning best practices, the plan translates community values into clear actions
that support a thriving, resilient, and sustainable future while preserving the county’s distinctive coastal character.
This chapter continues the narrative begun in Chapter 2: Public Engagement. It weaves together what we heard
from residents, businesses, and community partners with what we learned from technical studies and professional
analysis, illustrating how these insights collectively shaped the policy direction of the Board of Commissioners.
85
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 95
This page has been left intentionally blank
86
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 96
What we Heard
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
What We Heard
The path to NHC Destination 2050 began with a commitment to listen deeply to residents and partners. Through
more than forty engagement activities—open houses, focus groups, surveys, and mobile meetings—people across
the county shared how growth, housing, transportation, and the environment affect their daily lives. This effort gave
residents a voice in shaping policies that influence where and how the county grows, elevated local knowledge and
lived experience, and strengthened relationships between residents and their government. The result was a clear
set of priorities in light of the challenges ahead.
Community Voices
The engagement process revealed a strong consensus around the desire for responsible, balanced growth that
protects what residents value while addressing the needs of a changing population. Through open houses, pop-up
events, mobile meetings, and online surveys, residents described how they experience daily life in New Hanover
County. They shared how they valued an active and outdoors-oriented lifestyle that was deeply connected to
nature, but their lives were increasingly challenged by congestion, housing costs, and the pace of how the
community was changing through new development.
Residents expressed frustration that infrastructure—roads, sidewalks, bike lanes, and stormwater systems—has not
kept up with growth. They voiced concern about tree loss, flooding, and clear-cutting, and emphasized the
importance of green space, walkable neighborhoods, and local services within easy reach of homes. Many noted
that maintaining the county’s natural beauty and community character was key to their quality of life. Their
comments pointed to a shared belief that growth should reinforce, not undermine, what makes the county special.
Empowering residents to
inform policies affecting
daily life
Bringing forward local
knowledge and lived
experience
Strengthening
relationships between
residents and the county
87
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 97
What we Heard
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
Stakeholder Perspectives
Interviews and focus groups with business leaders, advocacy organizations, and civic groups added nuance to these
themes. Stakeholders added to residents’ concerns regarding housing by referencing that the need was for more
missing middle housing, attainable options for the workforce and middle-income households that fall between
subsidized housing and luxury development. They discussed the importance of diversifying housing supply while
ensuring that higher-density projects are context-appropriate and supported by infrastructure.
Participants also identified the need for more modern and coordinated infrastructure systems, stronger regional
partnerships, and policy frameworks that integrate environmental protection and economic development.
Representatives from environmental and civic groups stressed that resilience planning extended beyond flood
zones and needed to address stormwater, water quality, and heat impacts. Those from the development and
business community called for clear, predictable regulations and opportunities for collaboration in master planning
larger tracts of land, citing challenges due to high residential demand, land constraints, the time and cost of current
processes, and financing.
Across stakeholder discussions, a consistent theme emerged: growth and environmental stewardship should not be
competing goals—they must be pursued together through thoughtful planning and coordination.
Resilience & Climate
Adapting to and mitigating the effects of climate change.
Quality of Place
Fostering an attractive and livable environment for all residents.
Infrastructure & Support
Providing essential services and systems for community well-being.
Environmental Stewardship
Protecting and preserving natural resources for future generations.
Input
88
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 98
What we Learned
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
What We Learned
Public engagement established the community’s values; technical studies
confirmed and deepened those findings through data. Each analysis tested
what residents described against quantitative evidence, creating a foundation
for the Board of Commissioners’ policy decisions.
The consultant team’s Market Analysis (Rose & Associates Southeast, Inc.)
documented how demographic and economic trends are reshaping demand
for housing, employment, and commercial space and identified the location
and potential uses that were most likely for mixed-use developments in the
short- to mid-term. While the 2016 Comprehensive Plan sought to support a
mix of uses in many areas of the county, the market analysis showed that not
all part of the county were as likely to support a true mixture of uses within
the next decade and identified the locations and use mix most likely to be
needed.
The Housing Needs Assessment (Root Policy Research) quantified
affordability gaps and identified how limited land availability constrains new
construction. The Assessment identified the residential supply that would be
required to meet anticipated demand across the county, including the City of
Wilmington and beach towns.
Complementary studies prepared by county staff provided a local
perspective. The Stormwater Report analyzed runoff patterns and regulatory
gaps in a rapidly urbanizing coastal setting. The Tree Canopy Assessment,
using high-resolution imagery, documented canopy decline from 2014 to
2022 and mapped replanting opportunities. The report also included an
initial evaluation of the county’s tree retention standards and whether they
were working as intended. The Floodplain Program Technical Report
reaffirmed the county’s long-standing leadership in flood risk reduction and
summarized major updates to Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) maps effective in 2019 and 2025.
When viewed together, these reports confirmed that the community’s concerns reflect measurable trends. Growth
pressures are widespread but constrained by physical limits such as flood-prone soils and limited transportation
corridors. Economic development ambitions must be balanced with housing affordability, environmental quality,
and long-term fiscal sustainability. Transportation networks, stormwater systems, and water and sewer utilities all
require coordinated investment to accommodate growth safely.
The data also highlighted the importance of setting measurable goals—such as tree canopy targets, floodplain
management standards, and infrastructure phasing—to translate these findings into action. In each case, technical
evidence supported the values voiced by residents and stakeholders, illustrating how local experience and
professional analysis align.
Data-backed studies
supported and enriched
community values
•Market Analysis
•Housing Needs Assessment
•Stormwater Report
•Tree Canopy
Assessment
•Floodplain Program Technical Report
See the Appendices section of
the plan for full studies and
reports
89
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 99
Policy Direction
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
From Evidence to Policy Direction
Emerging Trends and Policy Implications
The synthesis of engagement and technical analysis identified several
countywide trends that shape the plan’s goals and policies. An aging population
is increasing demand for age-friendly housing, accessible design, and reliable
mobility options. Increased in-migration is boosting housing demand. Limited
land, historic development, and zoning rules raise development costs and stress
the need for context sensitivity in projects in close proximity to existing
neighborhoods and communities.
Travel demand is shifting toward multimodal options, underscoring the need for
connected sidewalks, bike facilities, and safe crossings near schools and job
centers. More frequent and intense storm events threaten drainage systems
and property, calling for expanded use of green infrastructure, updated
floodplain standards, and targeted mitigation. Middle-income affordability
pressures require a broader housing toolkit, including context-sensitive
residential development, accessory dwelling units, and rehabilitation of existing
stock, to preserve neighborhood character while meeting demand.
At the same time, the county’s economic resilience depends on supporting
diverse employment sectors—from logistics and the blue economy to health, life
sciences, and creative industries—through appropriately zoned and serviced
sites. Water and sewer infrastructure must be modernized to address emerging
contaminants and extend service where environmentally and fiscally feasible.
Land-use policies should conserve high-value natural areas through buffers, conservation subdivisions, and habitat
connectivity while encouraging low-impact development practices that improve water quality and resilience.
These trends link the county’s lived experience with data-driven evidence, forming the bridge between public
priorities and the policy framework of NHC Destination 2050.
Key Community Trends
Increasing demand for age-friendly housing and accessible design
Growing need for multi-modal transportation options
Concerns about increased frequency, intensity, and impact of storm events
Need for a diversified housing toolkit
More high quality jobs across sectors are important for economic resilience
Growing importance for water and sewer infrastructure
Growing demand for conservation resource protection and incorporating green infrastructure
Increased transparency for planning related decision making processes and policies
Need to reserve space for businesses and services given high residential demand
90
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 100
Policy Direction
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
Policy Direction
The integration of engagement results and technical findings culminated in policy discussions with the Planning
Board and Board of Commissioners. Two joint meetings—in October 2024 and May 2025—set the course for the
plan’s framework. The first focused on baseline data, consultant selection, and engagement strategy, leading to the
Board of Commissioners’ identification of seven priorities for the plan: master planning for large parcels, guidance
on residential density, tree canopy preservation, open space, stormwater management, flood mitigation, and
transportation coordination.
Input
At a 2024 joint work session with the Planning Board, the Board of Commissioners identified seven priority areas to guide development of NHC Destination 2050. Each priority became a building block for the plan's goals and implementation strategies, connecting local experience with long-range policy direction.
Master Planning of Large Parcels
Staff collaborated with large-parcel
owners and developers—and drew on the
Planned Development process—to craft
land-use alternatives and guidance for
cohesive, infrastructure-ready projects
and recommendations for master planned
development proposals.
Residential Density Guidance
The plan updates residential density
guidance to address housing needs while
preserving neighborhood compatibility
and infrastructure capacity, clarifying
where current zoning densities should
apply (Infill Residential) and where higher
densities belong in master-planned
developments (Community Mixed Use).
Tree Canopy Preservation
A countywide tree canopy assessment
by PlanIt Geo and a companion white
paper on tree standards created a data-
driven foundation for canopy goals and
replanting policies incorporated
throughout the plan. This assessment
will underscore implementation
strategies identified in Chapter 5.
Open Space Planning
Coordination with Parks & Gardens,
Sustainability, and Engineering staff
informed objectives to conserve open
space, link recreation areas, and integrate
accessible green infrastructure into
community design.
Stormwater Management
Planning and Engineering staff
collaborated on opportunities to assess
stormwater systems, identify gaps, and
recommend strategies to improve
drainage, water quality, and system
resilience.
Flooding and Hazard Mitigation
The Northeastern New Hanover County
Watersheds Flood Study informs
strategies for stronger floodplain
policies, reinforcing CAMA requirements
and guiding safer, risk-aware
development.
Transportation Coordination
The planning process was aligned with the Wilmington Metropolitan Planning Organization's Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) to
synchronize county and regional transportation goals and identify future multimodal investments. To prepare for future MTP updates and
other opportunities for funding, priority Roadway and Bicycle and Pedestrian projects are identified in Chapter 4.
Together, these seven priorities established the foundation for the four guiding themes of NHC Destination 2050—Quality of Place, Infrastructure & Support Services, Environmental Stewardship & Resilience, and Coordination & Engagement.
91
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 101
Policy Direction
Chapter 3 Framing the Policy
At the second joint meeting, staff and the consulting team presented the findings of the technical studies and
reports outlined previously and resulted in Board of Commissioner direction on plan goals and objectives. The
seven Board priorities were consolidated into four overarching goal themes: Quality of Place, Infrastructure and
Support Services, Environmental Stewardship and Resilience, and Coordination and Engagement. Each theme draws
directly from what the county heard and learned, and supports the county’s vision reflecting a shared vision of
sustainable, well-managed growth.
“A vibrant, prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building
a sustainable future for generations to come.”
Quality of Place
Goal: Create vibrant lasting places by balancing local character with future needs
Infrastructure & Support Services
Goal: Support long-term community needs through fiscally responsible growth,
infrastructure, and services
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Goal: Promote stewardship of natural resources and strengthen coastal resilience
Coordination & Engagement
Goal: Strengthen collaboration and engagement to guide community planning
The Board of Commissioners unanimously endorsed this direction in October 2025, commending the clarity of
maps and expectations, the emphasis on conservation and resilience, and the plan’s responsiveness to public
concerns. The framework that follows translates these goals into measurable objectives and implementation
strategies to guide the county’s future decisions.
92
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 102
Chapter 4: Visualizing the Future
This chapter outlines the Future Land Use Map and associated recommendations for unincorporated New Hanover
County and explains how the map translates the goals and policies of the NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive
Plan into a coordinated spatial vision for the community’s growth and conservation. The map, along with the
companion environmental features maps that are intended to supplement place type recommendations, provides a
framework for guiding land use decisions, infrastructure planning, and environmental stewardship, ensuring that
future development reflects the county’s values and priorities. It also serves as the foundation for aligning local
zoning and development policies with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
Recommendations are also included that outline priority transportation projects and roadway networks, guide for
corridor commercial development and master planned developments, and establish a framework for ongoing work
with the Seabreeze community. These plan components are intended to be referenced in staff work plans and
inform future development proposals.
93
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 103
This page has been left intentionally blank
94
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 104
Future Land Use
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Future Land Use Map
Each of the four goal themes of NHC Destination 2050 shaped the land use recommendations applied to specific
areas of unincorporated New Hanover County. The resulting Future Land Use Map provides a coordinated
framework to guide growth, conservation, and public investment decisions in alignment with community priorities.
The Future Land Use Map and associated recommendations were developed through a comprehensive process that
considered existing conditions and trends; technical studies on mixed-use potential, housing needs, and
transportation impacts; community input on development patterns; stakeholder feedback on market conditions
and environmental challenges; and coordination with regional partners through the plan’s Technical Advisory
Committee. Direction and policy priorities from the Board of Commissioners shaped the map’s final form.
Quality Of Place
The Quality of Place goal emphasizes that new residential infill should be compatible in character and
intensity with surrounding neighborhoods and that commercial corridors should be organized around
gateways, service nodes, and appropriate transition areas. Transitions and multimodal connections
are encouraged between higher-intensity development and established communities to enhance
neighborhood cohesion and accessibility.
Infrastructure and Support Services
The Infrastructure and Support Services goal guided recommendations to align land uses with water
and sewer investments in northern New Hanover County, where larger undeveloped parcels remain. It
also emphasizes maintaining opportunities for nonresidential development by prioritizing commercial
activity along major corridors where little land is available for new development and redevelopment
and by limiting conflicts with residential development in heavy commercial and industrial areas. Place
types are structured to support and encourage the master planning of larger development sites to
ensure cohesive design, infrastructure efficiency, and coordinated service delivery.
Environmental Stewardship and Resilience
The Environmental Stewardship and Resilience goal shaped the identification of areas where
environmental constraints, ecological function, and hazard considerations must be central to future
land use decisions. The Future Land Use Map highlights areas where resiliency measures should be
emphasized and clarifies that lower residential densities are encouraged in flood-prone or
environmentally sensitive areas to reduce risk and protect natural resources.
Coordination and Engagement
The Coordination and Engagement goal was considered through ensuring that the county’s future
land use recommendations take into account the development plans and existing patterns in adjacent
jurisdictions, supporting regional consistency and collaboration.
95
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 105
Future Land Use
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
The NHC Destination 2050 Future Land Use Map replaces the 2016 Comprehensive Plan’s map and incorporates or
supersedes historic small area plans, which should no longer be used to guide decisions on rezonings or ordinance
amendments. The unified map and its associated place types now provide a single framework for guiding land use
and development policy throughout the unincorporated county.
The map serves as a general representation of the county’s long-term vision for land use, development character,
and resource protection. It is intended to be implemented in coordination with the goals, objectives, policies, and
implementation actions outlined in this plan and in accordance with the authority granted to local governments
under the North Carolina General Statutes. In addition to its policy role, the Future Land Use Map has a direct
regulatory function under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), serving as a reference in determining the
consistency of major and minor permits within the county’s coastal management jurisdiction.
The individual place type areas shown on the map are not parcel-specific and should not be interpreted as zoning
classifications. Rather, they represent the general desired character, intensity, and function of the different types of
development that collectively form the county’s communities—neighborhoods, employment centers, commercial
corridors, civic spaces, and conservation lands. By focusing on the intended character and function of development
rather than prescriptive boundaries, the place type framework provides a flexible yet consistent tool for guiding
policy decisions, zoning determinations, and investments that advance the vision established by the Board of
Commissioners in the NHC Destination 2050 plan.
96
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 106
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Map 4.1 NHC Future Land Use Map
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
97
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 107
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Place Type Descriptions
Conservation
The Conservation place type applies to areas intended
to remain undeveloped and protected as open space
to conserve the natural environment, safeguard water
quality, protect wildlife habitat, and preserve
important cultural or archaeological resources. In
many cases, these areas also coincide with areas of
known environmental hazards, such as flood-prone or
environmentally sensitive lands, where limiting
development reduces community vulnerability and
supports long-term resilience.
Conservation areas are characterized by natural
landscapes such as wetlands, marshes, tidal creeks,
identified conservation resources, and managed
conservation lands. They provide essential ecosystem
services and contribute to the county’s scenic and
recreational value.
This place type is applied to permanently protected
lands and environmentally sensitive areas, including
Masonboro Island, mitigation lands, conservation
easements, significant conservation resource areas,
and land along creeks and waterways. These lands
are identified for conservation based on their ecological value, hazard
vulnerability, and public benefit.
Density/Intensity
None to very limited
Types of Uses
open space, low-impact recreation,
environmental education
Design Considerations
Development should be avoided
whenever possible. Where
development cannot be prevented
through local regulation,
preservation and conservation
easements are encouraged.
Map 4.2 Conservation Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
98
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 108
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Riverfront Conservation
The Riverfront Conservation place type is intended to
protect the natural environment, water quality, wildlife
habitats, important cultural and archaeological
resources, and areas prone to natural hazards,
specifically on the western banks of the Cape Fear and
Northeast Cape Fear Rivers across from downtown
Wilmington. The vision for this place type is to
maintain the area’s existing condition or reduce land
use intensity through brownfields mitigation or land
acquisition for conservation.
Low-impact public recreational uses, such as
greenways and docks, are encouraged. Civic uses and
the conversion of existing industrial properties to
lower-intensity non-residential uses will be evaluated
on a case-by-case basis.
This place type applies specifically to the land on
western banks of the Cape Fear and Northeast Cape
Fear Rivers between the Cape Fear Memorial Bridge
and Isabel Holmes Bridge. This area is unique due to
its industrial history, environmental sensitivities, high
visibility, and partial inclusion in the National Register
District that covers downtown Wilmington.
Density/Intensity
Limited; residential development
is prohibited
Types of Uses
low-impact public recreation and
potential civic and low intensity
non-residential uses
Design Considerations
No extension of CFPUA water or
sewer beyond county boundaries
would be approved. All
redevelopment should meet
resilience guidelines established in
the Additional Considerations
included in this Chapter.
Map 4.3 Riverfront Conservation Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
99
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 109
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Rural Residential
The Rural Residential place type is intended to
maintain the agricultural and open space character of
northwestern Castle Hayne while accommodating
limited low-density residential development. The goal
is to preserve the rural landscape and support
traditional land uses such as farming and forestry, as
well as conserved open space.
Farming, forestry, recreation, and conservation remain
the primary uses, with new housing designed to fit the
rural setting. Residential uses are generally limited to
single-family homes on larger lots. Homes may be
clustered to help preserve farmland or natural areas,
provided the overall rural character is maintained.
This place type applies to areas west of Castle Hayne
Road where agricultural lands predominate and where
no public water or sewer extensions are planned.
Utility extensions may be supported to mitigate
environmental risks from private wells and septic
systems but not to increase the density or intensity of
development.
Density/Intensity
Very Low, up to 1 dwelling unit per
acre
Types of Uses
agriculture, forestry, open space,
recreation, low-density single-
family residential
Design Considerations
Include open space, recreational
trails, and shade trees into any
development projects to maintain
rural character while supporting
connectivity.
Map 4.4 Rural Residential Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
100
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 110
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Infill Residential
The Infill Residential place type focuses on
compatible, lower-density housing within or near
established neighborhoods, emphasizing quality
design, neighborhood character, and resilient building
practices. It is intended to maintain neighborhoods
stability while allowing modest growth consistent with
existing zoning.
New development should reflect the scale, density,
and coastal character of surrounding neighborhoods.
Projects should be designed with attention to open
space, tree canopy, connectivity for pedestrians and
cyclists, and resilient building practices. Civic and
community uses may be appropriate but should be
designed to reduce potential impacts on adjacent
neighborhoods.
This place type replaces the General Residential
designation from the 2016 plan and applies to existing
residential areas with opportunities for context-
sensitive infill but limited roadway interconnectivity.
Density/Intensity
Low; consistent with existing
zoning
Types of Uses
low-density residential, civic,
recreational
Design Considerations
Incorporate open space, preserve
tree canopy, and ensure
transitions between new and
existing development
Map 4.5 Infill Residential Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
101
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 111
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Resilient Mixed Use
The Resilient Mixed Use place type encourages
compact, mixed-use development, while placing a
strong emphasis on environmental stewardship and
risk reduction. It is intended to allow for communities
that provide needed services while reducing exposure
to flooding and other risks.
Developments in these areas should be designed to
minimize risk and protect natural systems, and
utilities and open space should be planned to support
long-term community needs. Clustering of
development is encouraged to reduce exposure to
hazards, preserve open space, and safeguard water
quality and tree canopy.
Applied to environmentally sensitive or hazard-prone
areas where a mix of use might be appropriate, such
as the areas around wellheads that supply the Cape
Fear Public Utilities nano-filtration plant knows as the
wellhead protection portion of Greenview Ranches,
federal property along River Road near Snows Cut,
and Seabreeze. These areas offer development or
redevelopment potential but require special design to
minimize risk and protect natural systems.
Density/Intensity
Low to Moderate; up to 17
dwelling units per acre where
conditions allow or as part of
master planned developments;
limited in higher-risk areas
Types of Uses
residential, retail, office, services,
institutional, recreational
Design Considerations
Require water and sewer utilities,
clustered site design, and
integration of open space and
green infrastructure
Map 4.6 Resilient Mixed Use Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
102
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 112
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Community Mixed Use
The Community Mixed Use place type promotes
compact, mixed-use development patterns that create
active centers, combining housing, employment,
retail, and civic spaces. These centers are intended to
be walkable, connected, and designed for long-term
vibrancy.
A mix of uses within a single project or larger master
planned development is preferred and could provide
opportunities for higher residential densities and
taller building heights where appropriate transitions
in height, density, and character can be achieved. For
smaller or individually developed parcels, building
height is generally limited to 1-3 stories, and
residential densities are expected to remain moderate
(up to 17 du/acre).
This place type is applied to areas in northern New
Hanover County where larger undeveloped parcels
and areas offer opportunities for a mixture of uses
and appropriate transitions in density and intensity
and cohesive, master planned development. These
areas can accommodate growth while including
transportation connections, protection of natural
features, and public support facilities.
Density/Intensity
Moderate (up to 17 dwelling units
per acre and 3 stories) on
individually-developed parcels;
Moderate-High for master planned
developments
Types of Uses
residential, retail, office, services,
institutional, recreational
Design Considerations
Incorporate public spaces,
multimodal connections, and
environmental protection measures.
Master planned developments
should include transportation
connectivity and land for public
facilities necessary for planned build-
out.
Map 4.7 Community Mixed Use Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
103
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 113
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Employment Center
The Employment Center place type identifies areas
intended to serve as hubs for jobs and production
that are designed to support the county’s economic
base by concentrating a wide range of employment
opportunities and complementary uses.
These centers accommodate office, light industrial,
and supporting commercial uses, with opportunities
for housing and civic spaces when they fit well with
the employment focus. Building heights can range
from 1-7 stories, with taller buildings most
appropriate in areas with adequate infrastructure and
transitions to surrounding development. Residential
densities are expected to remain modest.
This place type is applied to locations such as the
planned Holly Shelter Business Park, Dutch Square,
North Chase, and along Old Castle Hayne Road, as
well as areas where employment and residential uses
are already adjacent. Its purpose is to strengthen job
centers while improving transitions between
employment and residential uses.
Density/Intensity
Moderate; up to 8 dwelling units
per acre for single-family
residential and 10-17 dwelling
units per acre for multifamily
residential when appropriate
Types of Uses
office, light industrial, employee
services, medical, civic, residential,
recreation
Design Considerations
Provide connectivity and
transitional buffers to nearby
residential areas
Map 4.8 Employment Center Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
104
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 114
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Corridor Commercial
The Corridor Commercial place type is intended to
provide accessible, well-designed shopping and
service destinations along major roadways to meet
residents’ daily needs without requiring long trips.
Development should be attractive, pedestrian-
friendly, and designed to reflect a high quality of
place, with attention to buffering and transitions that
protect nearby neighborhoods. Portions of corridors
are designated as either transitional—locations with
lower-intensity uses and impacts—or as nodes—
commercial centers where higher intensities and
building heights above three stories may be
appropriate when paired with quality site design and
sensitive transitions to adjacent neighborhoods (see
map on page 132). Residential uses are not
encouraged.
This place type is applied along major transportation
corridors to support commercial activity given limited
available land and strong residential demand. It
replaces previous Community Mixed Use and Urban
Mixed Use designations from the 2016 plan as the
focus is on commercial services rather than new
residential development.
Density/Intensity
No residential uses; moderate
intensity in transition areas and
high intensity in nodes
Types of Uses
retail, commercial services, office,
medical, civic
Design Considerations
Maintain high-quality site design that
mitigates impact on adjacent
residential areas, building heights
limited to 3 stories unless
appropriate transitions to existing
neighborhoods can be provided
Map 4.9 Corridor Commercial Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
105
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 115
Place Types
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Commerce Zone
The Commerce Zone place type provides areas for
the county’s core employment and production
activities, focusing on heavy commercial and light and
heavy industrial uses, including manufacturing,
warehousing, logistics, and outdoor storage-intensive
uses.
Office and complementary commercial uses may be
appropriate where they support the overall function
of the area. Unlike Employment Centers, residential
development is not allowed. Building height may
range from one to seven stories, depending on the
use and site design.
This place type is applied to areas where commerce
activities currently exist, or are planned, such as the
Highway 421 corridor, GE, Hermitage Road heavy
commercial areas, Blue Clay Business Park, and ILM
Business Park.
Density/Intensity
No residential development
allowed; intensity depends on use
Types of Uses
industrial, heavy commercial,
commercial services, office
Design Considerations
Accommodate truck access, provide
employee amenity areas, and use
enhanced landscaping and buffering
along major corridors.
Environmental impacts should be
evaluated and mitigated in project
designs.
Map 4.10 Commerce Zone Place Type
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
106
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 116
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Future Land Use Map: Natural Systems
In coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management and by incorporating feedback from the
Future Land Use Map comment period, planning staff created additional resource maps that showcase New
Hanover County’s natural systems. These maps are intended to be a source of information used in conjunction with
the Future Land Use Map by New Hanover County’s Planning staff, Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners.
They are also intended to inform citizens and developers about valuable and critical environmental areas.
Baseline data used in the creation of the natural systems maps was obtained from federal, state, and local sources
and has not been modified by New Hanover County. The portrayal of natural systems data is for informative and
planning purposes, and to aid in the development process by providing awareness to the possibility of hazard and
critical environmental areas. Final delineation of resources must be conducted in the field by an expert.
In New Hanover County, natural systems are areas that are valued and protected to ensure the longevity of the
county’s natural environment and safety of its citizens. The natural landscape and geographic location of New
Hanover County have combined to create a unique environment for rare plant and animal species. The location of
the county, bordered by the Atlantic Ocean, possesses natural hazard threats, including flooding, wind, and wave
damage during hurricanes and severe storm events. The delineations of natural features and hazard areas are
critical when planning for future development and their impact on the community. The following section identifies
environmental and flood-hazard areas that are governed by the state of North Carolina and the Coastal Resource
Commission (CRC) through the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). The delineation of these areas are to be used
in conjunction with the Future Land Use Map to aid in the development process by providing foresight of possible
hazard and critical environmental areas.
Background
In accordance with Chapter 7 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) and the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, CAMA established a state management plan to administer valuable coastal resources.
CAMA utilizes two elements to protect land and water resources: a local land use plan created by local jurisdictions,
which sets forth desired land-use patterns; and the designation of areas of environmental concern or
environmental sensitivity. This section of the Comprehensive Plan will outline principals within CAMA and the
objectives of North Carolina’s CRC.
107
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 117
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
In 1974, North Carolina adopted CAMA as a requirement of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act of 1971.
CAMA requires that the 20 coastal counties of North Carolina establish a cooperative coastal land management
program between local and state government for preparing, adopting, and enforcing local land-use plans. CAMA
planning guidelines ensure the protection, preservation, and management of coastal resources as well as the
promotion of orderly development along coastal regions of North Carolina.
Since 1976, New Hanover County has updated the original plan five times with the latest update in 2016. Over the
past nine years, New Hanover County has grown, developed, and flourished with new businesses, homes, shopping
centers and improved infrastructure. However, current trends in planning and development are changing so the
tools used to plan for the future must change also. Adapted as part of a larger planning initiative, this update of
New Hanover County’s CAMA plan is being integrated into the Comprehensive Plan. CAMA planning guidelines have
been an essential resource over the years and an important component during this process. Building on CAMA’s
vision to adapt to growth while preserving the values of coastal communities, the goals established in the New
Hanover County Comprehensive Plan that further support the mission and vision of CAMA and the protection of the
resources therein are as follows:
• Promote environmentally responsible growth.
• Conserve open space for long-term agriculture and rural uses.
• Conserve environmentally critical areas.
• Promote place-based economic development in the region that is tied to our natural resources.
• Preserve and protect water quality and supply.
• Ensure New Hanover County remains in attainment for air quality for certain pollutants in support of
clean air and improved public health outcomes to support continued growth. - Remaining “in attainment”
means the county meets the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s health-based National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
• Link major natural habitats.
• Conserve and enhance our unique sense of place to attract individuals, companies, and organizations.
108
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 118
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Special Flood Hazard Area
The land area covered by the floodwaters of the base flood zone is known as the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) maps. Shown in this section, the SFHA map includes two kinds of flood
areas: AE and VE. AE flood zones have a one percent chance of flooding per year. VE flood zones also have a one
percent chance of flooding each year but have the risk of additional hazards due to velocity from wave action during
storm events. Both are delineated by the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program and approved by FEMA.
New Hanover County is unique because it is bordered by the Cape Fear River and the Atlantic Ocean, making it
susceptible to flooding during heavy rain and major storm events. To protect private home and business
investments, North Carolina has building code requirements for structures built in the AE and VE flood zones, which
include elevating the structure above the base flood elevation level. Emergency planning operations are also in
place to protect life and property in flood prone
areas. Additionally, banks and lending
institutions require that home buyers purchase
flood insurance for a home in a SFHA, which
includes the AE and VE flood zones found in
New Hanover County.
New Hanover County is part of the NFIP and
has adopted a floodplain management
ordinance in order for citizens to receive
discounts for their flood insurance. For this,
the county has agreed to adopt and enforce
ordinances that meet or exceed FEMA
requirements to reduce the risk of flooding.
Flood maps are available to the public and
shown on the SFHA natural systems map.
Map 4.11 NHC Future Land Use Map
with Special Flood Hazard Areas
Source: N.C. Flood Risk Information System 2024
109
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 119
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Public Trust Waters
Public Trust Waters are the coastal waters and submerged lands that are open for public use and include activities
such as fishing, boating or swimming. These waters often overlap with other classifications of coastal waters such as
Outstanding Resource Waters, estuarine waters, tidal creeks, and inland waters such as streams and tributaries.
Waters that are considered public trust waters include: the Atlantic Ocean and the land underneath from the
normal high water line to the state’s official boundary three miles offshore; all navigable natural water bodies and
lands underneath, not including privately owned lakes; and all water in artificially created water bodies that have
significant public fishing resources and are accessible to the public from other waters. The types of public trust
waters described below illustrate how the different waters reflect the goals set by CAMA.
Public Coastal Waters
Public coastal waters are public trust waters that include tidal creeks, sounds, inlets, and – locally – the Intracoastal
Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean. These waters provide for many recreational activities, including fishing and shell
fishing, boating, and swimming. They are described as having high levels of salinity and providing a habitat for plant
and animal species that thrive in salt water environments. Coastal waters are under the jurisdiction of the Division
of Coastal Management (DCM) and are subject to CAMA regulations and the Coastal Resource Commission’s CAMA
minor permitting process.
Degradation due to pollution can affect the overall health of coastal waters, which has a direct effect on the
shellfish, fishing, and tourism industries. High levels of contamination can close shellfish fishing areas and pose
health risks to those consuming contaminated shellfish. The overall health of both inland and coastal waters is
correlated, because they are connected and influence each other. New Hanover County’s coastal waters are a main
attraction for tourism, with its many recreational opportunities as well as its ability to provide locally-sourced fish
and shellfish.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) under the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
establishes classifications for water bodies in the state.
110
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 120
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Public Inland Waters
Public inland waters are public trust waters and tributaries, such as creeks and streams, which flow into coastal
waters. Examples include tidal creeks, sounds, inlets, and – locally – the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic
Ocean. The headwaters of inland waters are fresh in nature but may turn brackish with levels of salinity increasing
as water nears coastal waters. Jurisdiction of inland waters belongs to the Wildlife Resource Commission; however,
under certain circumstances, inland waters may also fall under the jurisdiction of CAMA and be subject to the
Coastal Resource Commission’s CAMA permitting process.
Acting as the main natural discharge path for storm water into New Hanover County’s major tidal creeks, inland
water health is correlated to the health of the major tidal creeks. The county monitors water quality at various
locations, including inland waters. Degradation to inland waters poses human health risks and decline of the
natural environment. The deterioration and pollution of these creeks can affect the health of the major tidal creeks.
High levels of contaminants can trigger the closure of shell fishing areas and impact the safety of recreational use in
waters.
The North Carolina DWR, under the DEQ, establishes classifications for water bodies in the state. Inland waters are
overseen by the Wildlife Resource Commission unless they exhibit indications of coastal influence. Segments of
inland waters that exhibit coastal influence fall under the authority of the DCM. Determinations if an inland water is
within the jurisdiction of the DCM is based on the existence of indicators such as specific types of plant and animal
species or areas that are tidally influenced. The verification of the presence of indicators is conducted by the DCM
field experts. Inland waters that are determined to be within the DCM’s jurisdiction are subject to the CAMA
permitting process.
111
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 121
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Coastal-Joint-Inland Waters
The Coastal-Joint-Inland Waters mapping application is produced to help for illustrative purposes as a guide to
assist the public in interpreting rules of the N.C. Marine Fisheries Commission as recorded in the N.C. Administrative
Code. This application does not cover all of the Commission’s rules but does help to distinguish coastal waters that
are regulated by the NC Marine Fisheries and inland water that are regulated by the US. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Map 4.12 NHC Future Land Use Map with Coastal-Joint-Inland Waters
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
112
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 122
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Outstanding Resource Waters
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) are waters with
exceptional ecological significance that are used for
commercial fishing, shell fishing, and primary recreation,
and are important for aquatic life propagation. ORWs are
a subset of surface water classifications designated by
the North Carolina DWR. Each subset has its own
classification and associated rules which may be
designed to protect water quality, fish, and wildlife, or
other special characteristics. For ORWs, the classification
is intended to protect unique and special waters. These
waters must have an “excellent” rating by the Division of
Water Resources and be of “exceptional state” or
national ecological or recreational significance.
New Hanover County’s unique location and geography is
significant to ORWs. ORWs are regulated by CAMA and
enforced by the DCM and by New Hanover County.
When looking to buy land and/or develop areas in or
near ORWs, there are additional rules regulating or
restricting certain activities.
ORWs are defined by the North Carolina DWR under the
North Carolina DEQ. The North Carolina DWR establishes the
Surface Water Classifications for each water body in the state.
Classification rules are based on the minimum protection rules of
state and federal agencies. In order to be classified as an ORW, the water must be rated “excellent” by the DWR and
have one of the following outstanding resource values:
• Outstanding fish habitat and fisheries.
• Unusually high levels of water-based recreation or the potential for high levels of recreation.
• A special designation, such as North Carolina Natural and Scenic River or National Wildlife Refuge.
• Incorporate an important component of state or national park or forest.
• Have a special ecological or scientific significance (i.e., rare or endangered species habitat, or research or
educational areas).
Much of New Hanover County’s ORWs are also classified as SA Waters which include Class SB and Class SC waters.
Class SA waters are best used for commercial shell fishing and other uses specified by SB and SC. Many of the
county’s SA waters are also classified as ORW. Class SB waters are best used for primary recreation and other uses
specified by the SC class. Class SC waters are best used for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife,
and secondary recreation. More information on water classifications can be found in the appendix section of this
plan or on the North Carolina DEQ’s website.
Map 4.13 NHC Future Land Use Map with
Outstanding Resource Waters
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
113
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 123
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
NC Natural Heritage Program
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Significant Natural Heritage Areas, also known
as Natural Heritage Natural Areas, are
identified as terrestrial and aquatic sites that
have special biodiversity significance. These
areas of significance may be due to the
presence of rare species, exemplary natural
communities, or important animal
assemblages. These areas are designated by
the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) and are categorized as having
national significance, state significance,
regional significance, and local significance.
The Cape Fear Region is one of the most bio-
diverse areas in the Southeastern United
States. Preserving and protecting endangered
and threatened species is required under the
federal and state Endangered Species Act. The
NCNHP is part of the Division of Land and
Water Stewardship within the Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources. This program
has developed the most comprehensive
database of natural resource information by
combining on-the-ground surveys, GPS
services, and GIS mapping technology. The
boundaries are based on field surveys
conducted by the NCNHP staff and other professional biologists. These
boundaries are considered approximate. New Hanover County’s Natural
Area Inventory was created in May 2003 by Richard J. LeBlond and Gilbert
S. Grant. Information in the Natural Heritage Natural Areas database, formally known as the Significant Natural
Heritage Areas database, is included on a natural systems map.
Map 4.14 NHC Future Land Use Map
with Natural Heritage Areas
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental
Quality 2024
114
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 124
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Coastal Wetlands
Wetlands are present throughout New
Hanover County and it is important for
wetlands to be identified in the
development process so that they can be
considered for preservation or utilization
in project plans. Wetland information and
data for North Carolina comes from two
main sources: the National Wetland
Inventory (NWI) database (updated for
North Carolina in 2011) from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, and the North
Carolina Division of Coastal Management
(created in 1999).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service manages
the NWI database, which has produced
wetland maps and wetland data since
1974. This effort focuses on creating maps
for public reference as well as reporting
on national wetland trends. The database
provides the approximate extent of
wetlands and classifies these wetlands
under the Cowardin system of wetland
classification. The NWI is advisory in
nature and is not relied upon to establish
the presence or boundary of wetlands
subject to federal law, due primarily to the
scope and scale at which it is conducted and
the lack of sufficient field verification. The
National Wetland Inventory can be found on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s website.
The North Carolina Division of Coastal Management also maintains a wetland areas database, which utilizes NWI
data, soil surveys, and satellite imagery. Wetland data is available on the N.C. Division of Coastal Management’s
website. Additional information on wetlands can be found on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s website.
Map 4.15 NHC Future Land Use Map with Coastal Wetlands
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
115
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 125
Natural Systems Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Aquifers
New Hanover County relies on two major groundwater sources, the Castle Hayne Aquifer and the deeper Peedee
Aquifer, alongside surface water from the Cape Fear River. While the majority of drinking water is supplied from the
river, groundwater remains an essential resource for utility providers, small community systems, and private well
owners. As regional demand continues to increase, the long-term health, capacity, and resiliency of these aquifers
are critical to supporting sustainable growth.
A previous study conducted in three phases between 2011 and 2014 identified declining flows in the lower Cape
Fear River, influenced in part by increased upstream withdrawals. With anticipated population growth and rising
water demand across the region, New Hanover County may need to depend more heavily on groundwater sources,
so understanding and protecting aquifer systems is essential.
Aquifer planning in the county centers on two concerns: water quality and water quantity. Water quality risks stem
primarily from failing septic systems, leaking storage tanks, and the proliferation of private wells. These conditions
increase the potential for contaminants, such as sewage effluent or hazardous materials, to reach groundwater.
Large numbers of shallow wells may also contribute to saltwater intrusion, particularly in the Castle Hayne Aquifer.
The plan’s implementation strategies encourage expanding public water and sewer service, especially in
environmentally sensitive areas, to reduce reliance on wells and septic systems and improve long-term aquifer
protection. Water quantity challenges relate to capacity, recharge rates, and interconnections of the county’s
aquifers.
Groundwater also supports several small utility systems, including those operated by Aqua of North Carolina,
Carolina Water Service, and individual private wells within unserved areas. Protecting aquifer resources and
improving access to centralized water and wastewater services will be key to maintaining water quality and
safeguarding the county’s long-term drinking water supply. More information about the state of the aquifers can be
found on the U.S. Geological Survey’s website as well as the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources website under Groundwater Publications.
116
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 126
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Additional Planning Considerations
The following recommendations address key opportunities and challenges identified since the 2016 Comprehensive
Plan was adopted, including priority roadway and bicycle and pedestrian projects, desired street network
connections, expectations for master planned developments, and guidance tailored to the unique context of the
Seabreeze community. These recommendations provide direction that supplements the Future Land Use Map.
Together, they reflect Board priorities and emerging community needs, offering additional guidance for evaluating
new development proposals, shaping long range planning initiatives, and informing proactive staff implementation
strategies.
Transitions and Nodes
Promoting context-sensitive infill development is essential to supporting New Hanover County’s long-term growth
while preserving the character of existing communities. This approach ensures that new development aligns with
the scale, form, and function of surrounding areas and is thoughtfully integrated with the natural environment.
Transitions between development types are managed through several key elements designed to maintain harmony
between new and established areas. Higher-intensity uses are recommended along major corridors, in areas where
supporting infrastructure is most feasible, and near commercial or mixed-use centers, while lower-intensity
development is encouraged next to established neighborhoods. Building height and massing should be moderated
through thoughtful site design, including buffers, landscaping, and architectural techniques that create a softer
visual transition.
Connectivity is a central principle, favoring street and pedestrian linkages that create an integrated network over
cul-de-sacs or gated subdivisions that limit access and circulation. Streetscapes should be considered through
coordinated landscaping, lighting, benches, and other pedestrian-friendly features that contribute to a safe and
welcoming public realm. Stormwater and green infrastructure practices, such as ponds, naturalized open spaces,
and multi-use trails, can serve a dual purpose by providing functional environmental benefits and creating valuable
buffers between uses.
Collectively, these strategies support the county’s broader growth management goals by offering clear expectations
for both developers and residents. Transitional development principles help ensure that new master planned
developments and infill growth is compatible, environmentally responsible, and aligned with the community’s long-
term vision—balancing the need for housing and economic development with the preservation of neighborhood
character and natural resources.
The goal is to promote context-sensitive development that aligns with the scale and character of surrounding areas
while protecting natural resources and sensitive environmental features.
117
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 127
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Transitional Elements
Strategic Impact
Land Use Place higher intensity development near corridors and centers; lower intensity near established neighborhoods.
Building Height
Use buffers, landscaping, and design to soften taller buildings.
Connectivity
Favor street and pedestrian linkages over cul-de-sacs or gated layouts.
Landscaping & Design
Enhance streetscapes with trees, benches, lighting, and pedestrian-friendly features.
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure
Incorporate ponds and trails as buffers with added value.
Provides clear expectations for developers and neighborhoods.
Advances housing compatibility and environmental stewardship.
Supports long-term growth management goals.
Balances development with preservation of community character.
118
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 128
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Expanded Transitional Elements
Element Description & Examples
Land Use Transitions
• Step down intensity from mixed-use to single-family areas
• Use townhomes or duplexes as a buffer
• Place commercial uses at corners or along arterials
Building Height
• Step down building height near existing homes
• Use roofline variation and setbacks
• Retain mature trees or add vegetated berms
Connectivity
• Connect cul-de-sacs to trails or sidewalks
• Add mid-block pedestrian paths
• Avoid gated communities that block access
Landscaping
• Use layered plantings to soften building edges
• Add street trees and bioswales
• Preserve existing vegetation where possible
Roadways & Private Drives
• Align new streets with existing grid where possible
• Include sidewalks and bike lanes
• Use traffic calming near residential edges
Accessory Landscape Elements
• Install benches, trash receptacles, and lighting
• Use decorative fencing or trellises
• Add interpretive signage or public art
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure
• Use rain gardens or bioswales as buffers
• Design stormwater ponds with trails or seating
• Integrate green roofs or permeable paving
Hard Barriers
• Use decorative walls or fences with landscaping
• Avoid blank walls—add murals or green screens
• Ensure scale and materials match surroundings
119
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 129
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Map 4.16 Transitions & Nodes
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
120
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 130
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Future Land Use: Roadway Priority Projects
These priority roadway projects were identified as necessary to address current challenges or mitigate anticipated
future development and are intended to be advanced in coordination with the WMPO and NCDOT planning and
prioritization processes.
Map 4.17 Roadway Priority Projects
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
121
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 131
The page has been left intentionally blank.
122
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 132
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities Plan
The 2024 Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities
amendment to the 2016 Comprehensive Plan
introduced new strategies and guidelines that
expanded upon existing goals and promoted
additional bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure throughout the county. These
policies are moved forward in the NHC
Destination 2050 update as reflected on the
Priority Projects map, and policies are outlined
in Chapter 5 that clarify where bicycle and
pedestrian facilities are expected during the
development review process and formalize
policy direction requiring bicycle and
pedestrian easements—particularly along
Carolina Beach Road—when new
development occurs.
This plan serves as a key communication tool
between New Hanover County and the
Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (WMPO), ensuring coordination
when bicycle and pedestrian improvement
projects are considered.
Map 4.18 Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Projects
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
Figure 4.1 List of Bicycle &
Pedestrian Priority Projects
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
123
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 133
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Additional Considerations for the Western Bank
The Western Bank, located along the Cape Fear and
Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, has long served as an
economic and cultural hub for New Hanover
County. More than 20 years ago, community leaders
envisioned transitioning the area from its historic
industrial uses into a vibrant urban district,
mirroring the development pattern of downtown
Wilmington positioned across the river.
However more recently, redevelopment pressures
and new environmental challenges, including
increased sunny day flooding, prompted a
reassessment of that vision. In the Fall of 2023, the
county fast-tracked an amendment to the 2016
Comprehensive Plan, supported by three years of
public input and staff research. On October 16,
2023, initial concepts were presented to the Board
of Commissioners. Following a five-month public
review that generated nearly 3,000 comments, the
Board adopted the amendment. The update created
a new “Riverfront Conservation” place type,
emphasizing reduced land use intensity, brownfield
mitigation, and land acquisition for conservation. An
appendix provides context, existing conditions, and
resiliency strategies for future development, with
implementation focused on pursuing conservation funding.
While many areas of New Hanover County are vulnerable to flooding, the Western Bank is unique as it is subject to
regular sunny day saltwater flooding, is comprised of land with lower elevations than in many other places adjacent
to the Cape Fear and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, is impacted by flooding caused by up-stream rain events, and is
not protected by hardened features, such as bulkheads, which may not be allowable by current state regulations. As
a result, additional resiliency features should be provided for all development in this area, some of which are
outlined here. Requirements for additional studies, such as No Adverse Impact certifications, may be necessary for
new buildings. The extension of CFPUA water and sewer utilities to these properties would need to be carefully
considered and may require additional review and maintenance agreements, and extensions to jurisdictions
outside of New Hanover County are discouraged.
Map 4.19 Western Bank area
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
124
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 134
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Infrastructure Considerations
Roadways
The roadways leading to the Western Bank parcels are NCDOT roadways, but private developers would be
responsible for upgrades necessary for their projects. To ensure adequate emergency access to structures,
roadways and project drives should be elevated a minimum of 2 ft. over current base flood elevation and be
designed to facilitate safe vehicle travel and accessibility. More stringent requirements may be required by NCDOT
or NHC Fire Rescue.
Water & Sewer Lines
Water and sewer lines, as well as pump stations and other critical infrastructure, should be elevated in accordance
with regulatory requirements and resiliency best practices. Prior to approving water and sewer utility designs,
CFPUA can research, develop, and publish updated Technical Guidance for areas such as the Western Bank where
frequent and extreme flooding occurs. That guidance would include cross connection and backflow prevention
regulatory requirements and best practices to prevent contamination of the water supply from riverwater and
sewage overflow during flooding events.
Electrical & Communications Lines
It is preferred that, when feasible, utility lines should be buried in waterproof conduits to reduce the risk of damage
from floodwaters and wind. If utilities poles must be used, they should be made of materials resistant to corrosion
and water damage, such as treated wood, fiberglass, or steel. Power company specifications designed to
accommodate long-term resiliency that conflict with these guidelines should be followed.
Elevation & Floodproofing of Structures
Buildings and other structures should be designed to reduce the potential impacts of flood events, through
elevation or other types of floodproofing. Elevating foundations is generally recommended, though as floating
structures and other innovative designs are piloted in other floodprone locations and found to be successful,
additional options may be identified.
Flood-Resistant Materials & Design
Because of the frequency of saltwater flooding in this area, any structures and site amenities should be constructed
with materials that are less susceptible to water damage and corrosion, such as stainless steel, concrete, and
composite decking. Buildings will be required to be designed with flood openings, vents, or other features that will
allow water to enter and exit the structure freely during flooding events, reducing the risk of structural damage.
Stormwater Treatment
Due to flooding concerns and space constraints in this area, stormwater filtration systems have generally been
proposed to meet state water quality requirements. To address the impacts of stormwater on adjacent properties,
an engineering analysis and No-Rise Certification should be required for any new development.
Landscaping
Landscaped features to help mitigate the effects of saltwater flooding should be incorporated, such as planting salt-
tolerant plants between structures and the riverbank to help absorb floodwaters and stabilize the soil. Some salt-
125
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 135
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
tolerant trees, shrubs, and ground covers appropriate to New Hanover County include live oaks, southern
magnolias, dwarf yaupon hollies, wax myrtles, liriope, and sea oats. Plants should be monitored for signs of salt
damage, such as leaf burn or stunted growth. Alternate landscaping materials may be approved for compliance
with brownfield agreements.
For more information, please see the New Hanover County Planning and Land Use website.
Natural Hazard Risk Assessment & Tolerance Analysis Framework
This framework is intended to help inform county policies and programs with a natural hazard risk component,
along with other considerations. It outlines the level of risk tolerance—how much risk each consideration should
bear—from a high-level perspective. For example, when minimal risk is acceptable, this reflects a low risk tolerance
and suggests employing strategies to mitigate the risk. Conversely, if a higher level of risk is manageable, the policy
would generally advise that mitigation measures may not be required.
Consideration
Adaptation
(Future Risk, Uncertain)
Mitigation
(Existing Risk, Known)
Risk
Tolerance Focus Risk
Tolerance Focus
Underserved and
vulnerable
populations
Low
Avoid the risk/hazard for new
development.
Mitigate for conservative risk
scenario for existing
communities.
Low
Avoid the risk/hazard for new
development.
Prioritize mitigation for existing
communities.
Populations with
resources Moderate
Mitigate for conservative risk
scenario and consider the
return on public investment of
new development.
Moderate Prioritize mitigation based on
return on public investment.
Private investments High Allow private entity to bear risk Moderate Mitigate risk
Public investments Moderate
Mitigate for conservative risk
scenario and consider the
return on public investment of
new development
Low
Avoid the risk/hazard for new
development.
Mitigate risk for existing
infrastructure.
Natural Resources Moderate Mitigate for conservative risk
scenario Low Avoid risk
Historic & Cultural
Amenities Moderate Mitigate for conservative risk
scenario Moderate Mitigate risk
126
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 136
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Future Street Recommendations
Like all North Carolina counties, New Hanover County does not build or maintain roads. However, in addition to
coordination with transportation partners, the county also influences the future street network for the
unincorporated county through the subdivision process, as most new roads in the county are constructed and
designed by private developers.
In 2017, the county worked with the WMPO to study future roadway needs in the northeastern portion of the
county where future development was anticipated to occur. While this initiative did not result in a locally or WMPO
adopted plan, it did result in the following guidelines, which are being incorporated into this plan to inform
developers when designing new developments and roadway networks. These guidelines are intended to
supplement public planning efforts coordinated with the WMPO outlined in Chapter 5 of this document. They are
based on a continued mix of public and private roadways being allowed by county subdivision standards, though
this plan does prioritize public and public-access future streets.
Functional Classification
Functional classification is used by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) to define the intended function
or type of service of roadways within a system, as
depicted in Figure 4.1. Each classification also
incorporates expectations regarding the design of the
roadway, and its relationship with land development.
The county’s road network is built on this hierarchy,
with each type of roadway serving a unique role in how
people and goods move.
In general, the county uses the WMPO Roadway
Functional Classifications for planning and
development review purposes. A map showing the
current classification of public roadways in New
Hanover County can be found on the WMPO website.
Figure 4.2 Functional Classification Example
Source: New Hanover County Planning & Land Use 2025
127
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 137
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Design Alternatives
In order to ensure that new development supports improved connectivity and transportation options in the study
area and the rest of New Hanover County’s planning jurisdiction, the following design regulations and
considerations should be included in the county’s development ordinances.
Recommendations
• New Hanover County should continue enforcing the 1.4 link-to-node ratio as part of new development
projects. Link-to-node ratio is a common measure of street network connectivity based on the ratio of
road segments (links) to intersections and dead-ends (nodes).
• Streets and stub streets (for future connections) required by ordinance, recommended by this or other
adopted plans, or otherwise identified as connecting streets should be dedicated for public access.
• In hierarchical and fused street networks, collector streets should be spaced based on land use intensity
within the following guidelines when feasible.
o Very Low Intensity Areas (< 2 dwelling units/acre): 3,000 to 6,000 feet apart
o Low Intensity Areas (2-4 dwelling units/acre): 1,500 to 3,000 feet apart
o Low-Medium Intensity Areas (> 4 dwelling units/acre or commercial): 750 to 1,500 feet apart
• In grid networks, collector street cross sections may not be required if all streets are spaced according
to the appropriate block lengths.
• Subdivision standards related to roadway connections, provisions for public access, and guidelines for
the use of gates should be studied and updated.
Block Length and Access Management
Block length is a characteristic of density and connectivity. Denser and more connected local street networks have
shorter block lengths; low density development have long block lengths. Block length is an important feature to
consider when assessing pedestrian connectivity, as well, as most pedestrian crossings are placed at intersections.
Driveway cuts, which are tied to lot width requirements, should be minimized along collector streets to minimize
crash conflicts for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
The 2016 New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan outlined recommended block length ranges for different areas
of the county based on the place type. These recommendations have been revised to reflect the place type
classification refinements included in this plan.
Recommendations
• New Hanover County should retain a county-wide block maximum of 1,000 feet.
• Block lengths for new commercial, office, and mixed use developments should be around 400 feet, with
a maximum of 800 feet. Blocks between 200 and 400 feet in length should be encouraged in more urban
and pedestrian-oriented areas.
128
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 138
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
• Residential lots should not be designed to access collector streets, to reduce the number of potential
driveway cuts, and access along “connector” streets should be limited in a hierarchical network.
• New Hanover County should develop standards requiring shared driveways in mixed use and
commercial areas.
• New access points along existing collector streets or arterial roadways should be limited. Individual
driveways should be limited to those situations where no other access is available for a parcel, and new
intersections on these roads should be spaced no less than ¼ mile apart, when feasible, and preferably
aligned with existing access points.
Street Design Guidelines & Multimodal Considerations
While a well-designed street network will help support existing and future development, long-term traffic
management will require transportation options for different modes of travel.
Recommendations
• New Hanover County should develop street cross section standards, including bicycle and pedestrian
features, that link development types and intended roadway functions. The cross sections should
describe the total right-of-way width required based on anticipated build-out and multimodal
accommodations.
• Cross sections may also include pre-specified alternatives in cases where soil types or other identified
environmental constraints make the basic cross section inappropriate. Alternate design standards
could include allowing and/or requiring bicycle and pedestrian amenities to be located outside of road
cross sections for lower density developments.
• In situations where it is not feasible to initially construct the cross section ultimately needed for full
build out, the developer should be required to reserve sufficient right-of-way for the full cross section.
Suggested right-of-way widths include:
o Major Collector: 80-100 feet
o Minor Collector: 60-80 feet
o Local Street: 30-50 feet
• In situations where environmental or other constraints or requirements limit the ability to include
sidewalks or multi-use paths in the street cross-section for a non-NCDOT collector street, the developer
should provide an easement for future multi-use path connection(s) and/or construct a greenway link in
an alternative location.
• While future transit access is undetermined, residential development will require access for public
school buses. To accommodate school bus access for subdivisions, especially for those with private
streets, new residential developments are encouraged to provide a location for school bus stops near
the entrance, off the roadway, so through-traffic is not blocked and students can board and exit buses
safely.
129
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 139
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Traffic Calming
Streets that link subdivisions are desirable in terms of connectivity, but such “connector” streets generally
accommodate greater amounts of traffic, which can impact neighborhood residents. In such cases, traffic calming
features may serve to reduce traffic levels and speeds.
Recommendations
• New Hanover County should retain traffic study and proactive traffic calming subdivision options.
• Staff should prepare a guide for residents and developers on preferred traffic calming devices and the
instances where they may be appropriate.
• The county should consider requiring specific traffic calming features for required private local
connector streets to reduce impacts for future residents.
130
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 140
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Additional Considerations for the Seabreeze Community
The Seabreeze community warrants focused
attention in NHC Destination 2050 due to its
unique development patterns, environmental
sensitivities, and deep cultural significance.
One of the county’s most historic coastal
communities, zoning in Seabreeze has long
allowed for both residential and commercial
development, intending to reflect its past as
an African-American beach resort. Lots
remain small making traditional buffers
between uses less feasible, water access is
private, much of the properties are within
special flood hazard areas, and access to
water and sewer utilities are limited. In
addition, the area has been facing evolving
land use pressures in recent years that will
require thoughtful planning to honor its
character while addressing infrastructure,
access, resilience, and zoning designations
that have not resulted in the revitalization
envisioned in past planning efforts.
This section provides recommendations
intended to set a community-focused
planning framework that would support the
community’s long-term vitality and ensure
that future development aligns with the county’s broader land use policies. Map 4.20 Seabreeze area
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
131
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 141
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Recommendations
ecommend improvements in transportation, utilities, green spaces, and multimodal
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Community
Engagement
Engage residents, businesses,
and stakeholders to ensure the
recommendations or plans
reflects local priorities and
aspirations.
Zoning and Land
Use
Provide specific zoning and
land use recommendations
that complement the
countywide plan.
Development
Standards
Establish desired development
patterns, architectural styles,
and streetscape enhancements
(if applicable) that are
consistent with the
community's identity.
Partnership with Aqua
Strengthen working
relationships with Aqua to
better understand existing
procedures, maintenance
responsibilities, and service
protocols.
Collaborations
Establish partnerships with
environmental groups to
support efforts in
marshland restoration and
protection.
Property Owner
Database
Compile a comprehensive
database of property owners
and heirs to improve
communication, planning, and
coordination for future
initiatives.
Community Organization
Provide residents and property
owners information about
resources on common
community organizational
models that can support their
ability to represent their interests
and access technical assistance.
Overlay Zoning District
Assess the potential benefits
and challenges of establishing
an overlay or other specialized
zoning district to guide future
development and preservation
efforts.
Land Use Options
Evaluate suitable land use
options that align with the
community's character and
long-term vision.
Infrastructure Improvements
Recommend improvements in transportation,
utilities, green spaces, and multimodal connections
to support sustainable growth.
Implementation Strategy
Identify short- and long-term actions, responsible
entities, and tools to advance the community's
vision.
132
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 142
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Master-Planned Developments in Northern New Hanover County
Master-planned developments (MPDs) offer a comprehensive and forward-
thinking approach to land use, particularly well-suited for large, environmentally
sensitive areas like northern New Hanover County. These developments integrate
land use, infrastructure, environmental protection, and community needs into a
unified vision, enabling phased, organized growth that aligns with long-term
goals.
A key advantage of MPDs is economic efficiency and community livability. Shared
infrastructure and market-aligned phasing reduce costs and attract private
investment. Likewise, MPDs combines mixed-use zoning, walkability, green
spaces, and access to amenities foster vibrant, connected communities that
enhance quality of life and support local economic. Usually, they preserve natural
features such as wetlands and flood plains, which serve as critical buffers against
flooding and support biodiversity.
MPDs generally require mixed-use zoning
districts, such as the General Planned
Development District or PD, which will require
Board of Commissioner approval. However,
residential communities can also be master
planned. These projects may increase requests
for public participation to support future public
facilities and infrastructure and the need for
related Board of Commissioner policy guidance
on the use of taxpayer funds.
As the region continues to grow, MPDs offer a
strategic framework for balancing development
with environmental stewardship, infrastructure
coordination, and long-term resilience. This
approach ensures that future growth is both
sustainable and responsive to an area’s unique
challenges.
This map illustrates large parcels where planned
developments are possible
Key MPD Strategies
Complete Streets:
Balance mobility, safety,
and accessibility
Phased Infrastructure:
Align with county plans and
utility capacity
Commercial Nodes:
Cluster near intersections for walkability
Green Corridors:
Connect neighborhoods
with ecological buffers
Map 4.21 Master Plan areas
Source: NHC Planning & Land Use 2025
133
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 143
Additional Considerations
Chapter 4 Visualizing the Future
Master Plan Recommendations
Complete Street Design
Coordination
Coordinate closely with New
Hanover County Planning, Fire,
and Engineering staff, NCDOT,
and the WMPO to incorporate
complete street designs that
balance mobility, safety, and
accessibility.
Infrastructure Phasing
Alignment
Ensure water, sewer, and
transportation improvements
are phased in alignment with
any county adopted
infrastructure plans and the
Cape Fear Public Utility
Authority's capacity
management programs.
Commercial Node
Identification
Clearly identify and label
commercial nodes within the
master plan to guide future
development and land-use
decisions.
Commercial Activity
Clustering
Cluster commercial and mixed-
use activity areas near collector
road intersections or community
focal points to minimize vehicle
trips and support walkability.
Walkability and
Connectivity
Encourage walkability and
connectivity through street
grids, trails, and transit
Open Space Preservation
Designate and preserve open
space areas that serve residential
neighborhoods and support
recreation, stormwater
management, and ecological
functions.
Green Corridor
Designation
Designate interconnected open
space corridors that incorporate
natural drainage systems, preserved
wetlands, and tree canopy buffers.
These green corridors should
enhance ecological connectivity, and
provide pedestrian and bicycle
linkages between neighborhoods,
parks, and commercial nodes.
Environmental
Protection
Collaboration
Collaborate with New
Hanover County staff and
environmental partners to
ensure that development
plans protect natural habitats
and maintain environmental
quality.
Diverse Housing Options
Encourage a range of housing
options such as townhomes,
small-lot single-family homes,
accessory dwelling units, and
multifamily residences to
support diverse income levels,
household sizes, and life stages.
Phased Development Planning
Plan for phasing to ensure each stage is functional
and contributes to the overall vision.
Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitor and evaluate development outcomes to
inform future planning efforts.
134
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 144
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Chapter 5: Building the Future
This chapter translates the community’s vision for NHC Destination 2050 into the concrete steps needed to guide
day-to-day decisions and long-term investments. Building on the progress made since the county’s first
comprehensive plan was adopted in 2016, this chapter explains how goals, objectives, policies, and actions work
together to direct responsible growth, protect natural resources, and strengthen community character. It reflects
the Board of Commissioners’ focus on sustainable land use and environmental stewardship, as well as the priorities
shared by residents, businesses, and partners throughout the planning process. By defining measurable targets
and coordinated actions, “Building the Future” provides a roadmap for achieving the plan’s vision and adapting as
community conditions evolve. These tools ensure that implementation remains transparent, proactive, and aligned
with the needs values, and vision New Hanover County by creating a vibrant, prosperous, diverse coastal
community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come.
135
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 145
Goals, Objectives & Policies
This page has been left intentionally blank
136
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 146
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Translating Goals into Action
Throughout the public engagement and policy discussions that took place
during the NHC Destination 2050 planning process, we have heard
consistently that while residents see the need for new housing and
commercial services, they also want to preserve the qualities that make
New Hanover County special—its unique character, strong sense of place,
and high quality of life. The Board of Commissioners has emphasized the
importance of protecting our natural environment, coordinating growth
with infrastructure capacity, and improving planning processes so
residents can more easily understand and participate in decisions.
In response, staff developed four broad goals for NHC Destination 2050
that reflect the outcomes the community wants to achieve:
Objectives will, in coordination with identified measures,
help us track whether progress is being made. Policies are
identified for each objective and will serve as guiding
principles for the Board of Commissioners when considering public investments and development decisions.
Actions will outline the specific steps county staff and partners will take to implement the plan. Together, these
goals and policies will inform the place type recommendations on the Future Land Use Map.
• Goals express the public’s values and desire for improved water quality, natural-resource protection,
residential character and commercial corridors.
• Objectives clarify how progress toward each goal will be achieved.
• Policies guide consistency during the review process and decision making.
• Implementation Actions assign specific tasks and timelines.
Goals
Objectives
Policies
ImplementationActions
Future Land Use Map
Policies
Together, these elements create a clear framework for how
New Hanover County will grow, adapt, and thrive through 2050.
Figure 5.1 NHC Destination 2050 Implementation
Source: New Hanover County Planning & Land Use 2025
137
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 147
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Quality of Place
Goal: Create vibrant lasting places by balancing local character with future needs
Objectives Policies
Promote a strong sense of place
that enhances community
character and access to shared
resources
The county’s unique cultural, historical, and environmental assets
should be enhanced, protected, and safeguarded as central to
community identity and sense of place.
New development and redevelopment should be designed to
complement the existing built environment and highlight natural
landscapes.
Vibrant, people-centered spaces and mixed-use hubs should be
encouraged to strengthen social connections, support small businesses,
and provide walkable, community-oriented destinations.
A connected network of parks, trails, greenways, water access, and
cultural facilities should be supported to ensure equitable access.
Inclusive design and accessibility should be supported to allow all
residents, including those with disabilities, to fully utilize public spaces
and shared resources.
Strengthen the long-term viability
of neighborhoods and corridors
Neighborhood reinvestments and adaptive reuse should be promoted
to sustain long-term viability while minimizing impacts on established
communities.
Master planned developments should provide a range of housing types
and community amenities to accommodate residential demand while
preserving land for commercial and employment use.
New development should incorporate appropriate transitions in scale,
design, and intensity to protect the character and stability of existing
neighborhoods.
Commercial development should be focused along roadway corridors
where it can capture existing traffic, deliver new services for residents,
and support multimodal connections.
Infrastructure and development along corridors should be designed to
accommodate future needs and development patterns that can shift
with economic and demographic changes.
138
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 148
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Quality of Place
Goal: Create vibrant lasting places by balancing local character with future needs
Objectives Policies
Enhance opportunities for vibrant
and distinctive gathering places
Development of community hubs and public spaces should be
encouraged to strengthen identity, civic engagement, and year-round
activity.
Master planned developments and large-scale mixed-use projects
should incorporate distinctive public spaces—such as squares, plazas,
and forecourts—that support civic, commercial, and cultural life.
Walkable centers that concentrate commercial, civic, and cultural uses
should be promoted as focal points for vibrant gathering places.
Programs and events that animate public spaces and foster cultural
identity and social cohesion should be supported.
Increase connectivity between
neighborhoods, corridors, and
destinations
Expansion of multimodal networks should be pursued to provide safe,
convenient, and accessible travel options for motorists, bicyclists, and
transit users.
Connectivity across neighborhoods, jurisdictions, and property lines
should be strengthened through roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian
linkages that integrate new development with existing and planned
networks.
Land use and development patterns should support walkable, bike-
friendly, and transit-accessible communities by encouraging
connections between residential areas, commercial services, schools,
parks, and employment centers.
Street design should be context-sensitive and consistent with complete
streets principles, reflecting the character and needs of surrounding
neighborhoods while enhancing safety and multimodal access.
Master planned developments should incorporate the future street
recommendations outlined as Additional Considerations in Chapter 4
of this plan and provide internal and external connections that improve
mobility and access to key destinations.
139
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 149
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Infrastructure & Support Services
Goal: Support long-term community needs through fiscally responsible growth, infrastructure, and services
Objectives Policies
Support safe and reliable
infrastructure that sustains
existing residents and
neighborhoods
Essential public infrastructure in established neighborhoods should be
maintained and upgraded as required to ensure equitable access and
reliable service delivery.
Private and public investments that expand access to public water,
sewer, and other essential services for existing communities should be
encouraged.
Master planned developments, especially larger projects that
incorporate space for new community services (fire stations, schools,
parks, etc.), should be supported and guided by clear standards and
processes.
Resiliency and sustainability should be incorporated into infrastructure
systems so they are able to withstand environmental impacts and can
support long-term community health.
Infrastructure planning and investment should be aligned with land use
goals, prioritizing infill, redevelopment, neighborhood stabilization, and
master planning of new communities.
Align public investments to
accommodate fiscally responsible
future growth and changing
community needs
Infrastructure and public facilities planning should be coordinated with
future land use patterns to ensure fiscally responsible and well-
sequenced growth.
Public infrastructure investments should be prioritized for areas
targeted for growth and redevelopment to maximize community
benefits.
Future development should be encouraged in locations with existing or
planned infrastructure in order to reduce long-term public costs.
Public-private partnerships should be leveraged to expand
infrastructure capacity and increase return on public investments.
140
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 150
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Infrastructure & Support Services
Goal: Support long-term community needs through fiscally responsible growth, infrastructure, and services
Objectives Policies
Strengthen community safety and
well-being
Development and redevelopment should incorporate design strategies
that enhance public safety, visibility, and safe access for all residents.
Green space, active transportation networks, and design features that
support physical health, mental well-being, and social connection
should be promoted.
Site designs that enhance visibility, activity, and safe access for
residents should be supported, while gated access and street designs
that hinder emergency response should be discouraged.
Hazard-sensitive design should be integrated into development to
ensure reliable emergency access and community safety during storm
events.
Foster a resilient and diverse local
economy
Place-based and diversified economic development that leverages
natural resources, cultural assets, and regional attractions while
broadening opportunities through entrepreneurship, small business
growth, and innovation should be promoted.
Master planned developments that integrate regional destinations and
amenities and strengthen supporting infrastructure should be
encouraged to attract investment and enhance community vitality.
Development standards that support high-wage industries, reduce
impacts on county services and natural resources, and ensure
readiness for future economic and technological shifts should be
supported.
Efforts to build a resilient and inclusive business environment, such as
partnerships with educational institutions and workforce programs,
should be supported to enable businesses and residents to adapt to
changing environmental, economic, and social conditions and promote
sustainable long-term growth.
141
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 151
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Goal: Promote stewardship of natural resources and strengthen coastal resilience
Objectives Policies
Increase preparation for
changing natural hazards
The extension of new public infrastructure in areas with increased
environmental hazards should be evaluated carefully and may require
additional safeguards and maintenance agreements or may be prohibited
when risks are too great.
The risk tolerance framework outlined in this plan should guide the analysis,
prioritization, and approval of capital projects and major community
investments.
New development in hazard prone areas should incorporate resilient building
and site design, including landscaping that mitigates saltwater flooding and
frequent tidal inundation.
Sustainable resource management, including the conservation or restoration
of natural systems that enhance coastal resilience and reduce community
vulnerability, should be promoted.
Reduce community
vulnerability to flooding and
storm impacts
Decisions on zoning and development standards should incorporate the 2025
Northern New Hanover County Watersheds Flood Study and other technical
studies related to flooding and storm impacts that are accepted or approved
by the Board of Commissioners.
Development in wetlands, floodplains, and other flood prone areas should be
discouraged or mitigated, with new development directed toward lower-risk
locations.
Higher-risk uses should be discouraged in areas with existing flooding
concerns.
Community preparedness and capacity to withstand flooding and storm
events should be strengthened by proactive planning and investment.
Protect and enhance
natural resources, water
quality, and water supply
Lower intensity development and other conservation alternatives should be
encouraged in sensitive areas such as wetlands, floodplains, and high flood
hazard zones to safeguard water quality and ecosystems.
Estuarine waters, primary nursery areas, outstanding resource waters, and
shellfishing waters should be protected by limitations on dredging and marine
development to scientifically justified, low-impact circumstances. (NOTE:
More details are outlined in the plan for CAMA purposes.)
Stormwater and drainage systems should be designed to align with
predevelopment hydrology and to minimize direct discharges to surface
waters.
Water resources and supplies should be safeguarded and sustainably
managed through practices that consider aquifers and minimize
contamination risks.
142
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 152
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Goal: Promote stewardship of natural resources and strengthen coastal resilience
Objectives Policies
Sustain a healthy and diverse tree
canopy and connected ecosystems
Tree canopy should be protected and expanded throughout
unincorporated New Hanover County.
Tree plantings and landscaping in new developments should be
designed to contribute to ecosystem health, provide shade, and reduce
urban heat impacts, with a focus on native species.
Open space should be connected to strengthen biodiversity and
ecological resilience.
Community stewardship and education should be promoted to support
the long-term care and appreciation of trees and natural systems.
Expand and improve open space
for ecological and community
benefits
Development patterns and practices (e.g. stormwater design) that
preserve natural areas, buffers, and significant trees, while minimizing
adverse environmental impacts of the built environment, should be
encouraged.
The identification and preservation of open spaces should be
incorporated into early development planning and review to ensure
new projects coordinate and connect open spaces to create cohesive
natural areas and wildlife corridors.
Conservation of lands that protect natural resources, wildlife habitat,
and biodiversity, while supporting educational and passive recreational
opportunities, should be promoted.
Uses on undeveloped barrier and estuarine system islands should be
limited to research support and passive recreation.
Preserve coastal and community
infrastructure essential to
ecosystem health and quality of
life
Resilient shoreline and habitat infrastructure that protect coastal
systems and maintain ecosystem functions should be encouraged.
Floating home development without adequate pump-out or sewer
facilities should be prohibited to protect public trust waters and reduce
risks to people and property.
Land use and infrastructure decisions for hazard prone areas should
minimize risks to life, property, and ecosystem health.
Public utility extensions and infrastructure improvements should
balance community resilience needs with the protection of sensitive
natural systems.
143
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 153
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Coordination & Engagement
Goal: Strengthen collaboration and engagement to guide community planning
Objectives Policies
Expand opportunities for the
public to share community
perspectives that inform planning
decisions
Broad access to engagement opportunities should be
encouraged so that residents of all backgrounds can participate
in the planning process.
Communication strategies should be transparent, accessible, and
inclusive of residents with different languages, abilities, digital
access, and civic experience.
Community planning efforts should support ongoing and
consistent relationships with the community to build trust and
support informed participation.
Strengthen partnerships with
regional and local organizations to
align efforts and leverage resources
Coordinate regional planning efforts to align infrastructure
investments, transportation systems, and growth strategies
across jurisdictional boundaries to support shared goals and
reduce duplication of resources.
Leverage partnerships with community groups, nonprofit
organizations, and other local governments to advance the goals
and implementation actions of this plan and enhance community
benefits and shared outcomes.
Expand cross-sector collaboration with public, private, and
institutional partners to address complex community challenges,
maximize available resources, and strengthen long-term
resilience and prosperity.
Improve public understanding of
planning concepts and processes
Planning information should be presented in clear,
straightforward language and provided in accessible formats so
that it can be easily understood by residents and stakeholders.
Educational opportunities should be provided to support
residents’ and stakeholders’ understanding of planning concepts,
processes, state regulations, and decision-making
considerations.
Community engagement activities should be structured to
support meaningful participation so residents have the
information and context needed to contribute effectively at key
decision points.
Administrative and compliance processes should be conducted
in a clear, transparent, and predictable manner to build
community trust and confidence in planning decisions.
144
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 154
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Implementation Strategies
The implementation strategies outline how New Hanover County will put the policy recommendations of NHC
Destination 2050 into action. They identify the key tools the county will use—technical studies and reports; updates
to development ordinances and review processes; targeted programs, public and private capital investments; and
collaborative partnerships —to advance the plan’s goals and objectives.
These strategies establish a framework for coordinated implementation by county staff, partner agencies, and
community organizations. The Board of Commissioners will guide these efforts through policy decisions and
funding priorities that align with the plan’s direction, while county departments and partners will integrate the
strategies into their ongoing work programs and planning processes.
A companion Action Plan will follow this section and outline specific steps for implementation, including the
primary departments involved and anticipated timeframes. These action items, and the measures identified to
assess implementation, will be actively monitored and reported to the Board of Commissioners on a regular basis.
Together, these actions will ensure that NHC Destination 2050 remains a living plan—regularly updated to reflect
progress, lessons learned, and the evolving needs of the community.
145
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 155
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Quality of Place
Studies
• Develop a countywide plan for a connected network of parks, trails, greenways, water access, and cultural
facilities, coordinated with the Parks Master Plan update
• Update the inventory of historic and cultural buildings
• Identify key gateway areas into the county along corridors and develop design recommendations for
those locations
Code & Development Process Updates
• Update and/or develop building, sign, and site design standards for development along key roadway
corridors
• Develop guidelines and incentives for plazas and other open space as part of new commercial and mixed
use development
• Reduce barriers to and incentivize the use of master planned development tools*
• Update development standards to address the impacts of corridor commercial development on adjacent
residential developments
• Update county standards for access, connectivity and street network design in coordination with NCDOT
and WMPO
• Develop standards to allow for the adaptive re-use of existing structures for the types of commercial
services intended for commercial corridors
• Work with property owners of residentially zoned land located along identified commercial corridors to
rezone properties
• Require new development along roadways with planned bicycle and pedestrian features outlined in the
Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Project map to provide an easement for future multi-use trails
*This implementation action also supports the Infrastructure and Support Services goal and is shown under that heading as well.
146
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 156
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Quality of Place
Programs
• Develop and implement a community planning program where staff can work with residents on strategies
and recommendations for community development and placemaking opportunities
• Support placemaking initiatives such as pop-up markets, street festivals, and mobile community services
that celebrate local culture and bring residents together
• Consider programs to support the rehabilitation of aging housing and commercial structures
Capital Investments
• Invest in parks, trails, greenways, water access, and connecting networks as outlined in the network plan
and Parks Master Plan (identified under Studies)
• Revitalize waterfront parks and public spaces to encourage opportunities for formal and informal social
gatherings
• Incorporate multimodal improvements along corridors to improve resident access
Partnerships
• Continue working with partners to conserve land on Western Bank
• Coordinate with New Hanover County Schools, City of Wilmington, and other community partners on
plans for and investment in parks and other recreational amenities
• Work with WMPO, NCDOT, and other partners on obtaining funding for multimodal connectivity
• Partner with nonprofits, business associations, and cultural organizations to activate public spaces with
programming that reflects the county’s diversity and heritage
147
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 157
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Infrastructure & Support Services
Studies
• Review NHC subdivision standards to identify opportunities to support more resilient and sustainable
infrastructure
• Develop guidelines for development designs that enhance public safety
• Audit subdivision standards for street network design to ensure provisions support emergency response
• Finalize and publish maps showing the maintenance status of roadways in the unincorporated county
• Work with the WMPO to develop a future roadway network plan for all of unincorporated New Hanover
County
Code & Development Process Updates
• Reduce barriers to and incentivize the use of master planned development tools*
• Update standards for street network design as identified in the subdivision standards audit
• Incorporate ongoing and regular maintenance updates to UDO
• Consider updates to the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD) or other zoning tools or development
standards to proactively prepare for future roadway projects
• Update requirements for traffic impact studies for master planned developments to better support long-
term planning
• Require new development along roadways with planned bicycle and pedestrian features outlined in the
Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Project map to provide an easement for future multi-use trails
Programs
• Develop clear standards for development agreements to allow for partnerships with private developers
when appropriate to incorporate future public facilities in master planned developments and to align
infrastructure timing with project build-out (may ultimately require capital investments)
• Promote and market existing greenspace, active transportation networks, and community recreational
facilities
• Regularly review and update development standards in the UDO to ensure they support desired
industries and development patterns and are responsive to emerging needs
• Update water-sewer loan program to support residents’ and community groups’ access to public water
and sewer
*This implementation action also supports the Quality of Place goal and is shown under that heading as well.
148
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 158
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Infrastructure & Support Services
Capital Investments
• Consider projects to design and construct water and sewer utilities for communities most in need
• Explore emerging digital technologies that can assess cumulative impacts and identify projects to mitigate
them
• Complete ongoing projects to provide new fire stations and library in northern New Hanover County
• Invest in public facilities and programs that support physical, mental, and social engagement
opportunities
• Invest in public facilities and programs that support emergency services and community safety
Partnerships
• Coordinate with CFPUA to prioritize and implement water and sewer investments that support economic
development and neighborhood stability
• Strengthen working relationships with Duke Progress and other private utility providers to ensure that
residents have access to needed utilities
• Coordinate with NHCS on student population data and planning for new school facilities aligned with
Future Land Use Map
• Work with the WMPO to incorporate transportation projects identified in this plan into WMPO planning
documents
• Work with WMPO, NCDOT, and other partners to obtain funding for transportation projects that will
support anticipated future development needs
• Coordinate with NCDOT, WMPO, and utility providers to align corridor investments with regional
transportation and infrastructure plans
• Continue working with WBD, WDI, County Tourism, Chamber of Commerce, and others to increase
diversity and resiliency of the local economy
• Coordinate with the WMPO and Wave to expand access to transit services to residents in the
unincorporated county
• Continue workforce partnerships with educational institutions and nonprofits
• Coordinate with community partners on planning for support services and facilities aligned with Future
Land Use Map
149
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 159
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Studies
• Update NHC portion of regional hazard mitigation plan
• Develop Resilience Strategy for the Upper Smith Creek Watershed
• Develop an action plan to increase the county’s access to funding for mitigation projects in adopted plans
• Audit existing conservation resource standards and procedures
• Finalize and publish data on conservation land and regulatory open space
• Develop a plan for connected open space in coordination with the Parks Master Plan update
• Develop and implement a green infrastructure plan that identifies a network of natural lands and open
spaces to support biodiversity and wildlife protection in addition to recreation and transportation
• Develop watershed plans to address water quality concerns in county creeks and waterways
• Develop a conservation land priorities plan
• Audit local provisions for community boating facilities and other water dependent uses to identify
potential updates to guidelines and standards
Code & Development Process Updates
• Update landscaping ordinances and guidelines to increase the use of native vegetation and tree retention
and to incorporate recommendations for land with frequent flooding
• Update processes and guidelines for the administration of conservation resource, tree retention, and
other existing environmental standards to ensure they work as intended
• Develop canopy-based tree retention ordinance or options
• Consider additional best practices or code updates, to the Floodplain Management ordinance and other
local provisions, to mitigate risk in flood prone areas
• Strengthen existing open space standards and develop incentives to increase the connectivity and
ecological value of open space areas
• Establish standards and/or incentives for protective buffers along rivers, creeks, wetlands, and estuaries
to filter runoff and maintain water quality
• Continue to ensure drainage from land use activities has a rate of flow and volume characteristics as near
to predevelopment conditions as possible
• Strengthen the county’s CAMA program by ensuring that the CAMA related policies and guidelines
incorporated in this plan are considered during the review of CAMA permits and in planning projects
150
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 160
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Programs
• Update tree fund program to increase preservation, plantings and leverage partnerships
• Continue monitoring and evaluations of tree retention standards
• Support outreach and education regarding the use of native vegetation and discouraging invasive species
• Explore expanding Community Rating System (CRS) program to reduce flood insurance costs and increase
community awareness of flood risk
• Consider assistance programs to support existing residents’ mitigation of flood risk on their homes
• Provide services to advise/incentivize homeowners and businesses to help support water quality through
additional stormwater practices
• Continue local, regional, and state efforts to monitor and enhance water quality
• Continue Soil & Water programs that support green infrastructure, agricultural water conservation, and
non-point source pollution reduction
Capital Investments
• Pursue funding for projects identified in regional hazard mitigation plan
• Pursue funding for projects identified in Smith Creek Resilient Coastal Comunities Program Plan
• Pursue fuding for projectes udentified in the Pages Creek Restoration Plan
• Continue investment in stormwater maintenance as part of the county Stormwater Services Program
• Incorporate the risk tolerance framework into the analysis, prioritization, and approval of capital projects
Partnerships
• Continue partnerships with Alliance for Cape Fear Trees, Lower Cape Fear River Program, Stewardship
Development Program, Masonboro Local Action Committee, and others to leverage common efforts to
achieve shared goals
• Coordinate with CFPUA to prioritize and implement water and sewer investments that reduce the
environmental impacts of private wells and septic systems
• Coordinate with CFPUA, NC DEQ, and regional partners to monitor emerging contaminants and
implement best management practices
• Support long-term planning for water and sewer infrastructure to align with projected growth and ensure
sufficient supply
• Pursue land conservation partnerships to preserve critical habitat and natural resource lands, particularly
in floodplains and recharge areas
151
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 161
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Coordination & Engagement
Studies
• Work with regional partners to develop and publish regional data sets
• Develop interactive and accessible online tools (maps, storyboards, dashboards) that allow residents to
explore data and test land-use scenarios
Code & Development Process Updates
• Update internal procedures for the development review and construction process to increase
transparency for residents and other stakeholders
• Continue clarifying and updating ordinance provisions so they support residents’ understanding of the
planning process and zoning administration
• Update planning staff reports to align with Comprehensive Plan update and increase stakeholder
understanding of applications
Programs
• Develop a community planning program that will provide more opportunities for residents to provide
perspectives outside of the development review process
• Host county-sponsored engagement meetings in multiple formats to increase accessibility
• Maintain and regularly update a user-friendly webpage or planning portal that explains key planning
concepts, ongoing initiatives, and how to be involved
• Update public planning document templates with plain language and visual aids
• Expand public speaking and education activities on planning-related topics
• Develop educational resources for HOAs related to infrastructure maintenance responsibilities
• Establish an organization-wide framework for demographic and spatial data to support continued
planning efforts and public communication
152
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 162
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5: Building The Future
Coordination & Engagement
Capital Investments
• No capital investment has been identified for this goal
Partnerships
• Strengthen relationships with planning and development-related staff in adjacent jurisdictions to allow for
ongoing, regional coordination
• Support cross-jurisdictional initiatives to address shared community challenges
• Expand partnerships with community groups, nonprofit organizations, and other local governments to
identify projects and leverage efforts
• Work with City of Wilmington to update guidelines, procedures, and interlocal agreements for
annexations
• Build relationships with HOA representatives
• Coordinate with partner agencies on planning engagement to address cross-jurisdictional questions or
concerns
153
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 163
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) – Specific Policies & Implementation Actions
New Hanover County’s location along North Carolina’s coast means that many development and conservation
activities fall under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). The policies and implementation strategies outlined
in this section provide additional guidance specifically for CAMA permit review and decision-making. This
information supplements the broader policies and implementation actions of the Comprehensive Plan that guide
county decisions and work.
Policies & Permit Review Considerations
Encourage the development of public shorefront access areas and boat
access areas that do not adversely affect estuarine resources or public
trust waters.
Allow uses of estuarine and public trust waters that provide benefits to
the public and satisfy riparian access needs of private property owners
while encouraging shared boating facilities instead of individual boating
docks.
Provide for the protection and development of public shorefront and
boat access areas.
Development or expansions of marinas (as defined herein) in primary
nursery areas, outstanding resource waters, or open shell fishing waters
may occur when the following conditions exist, unless not allowed by
state rules:
• There exists a previously permitted channel which was
constructed or maintained under permits issued by the State or Federal Government. If a natural channel
was in use, or if a human-made channel was constructed before permitting was necessary, there shall be
clear evidence that the channel was continuously used for a specific purpose; and
• Excavated material can be removed and placed in an approved disposal area without significantly impacting
adjacent nursery areas and beds of submerged aquatic vegetation; and
• The original depth and width of a human-made channel or natural channel will not be increased to allow a
new or expanded use of the channel.
Marina: any publicly or privately
owned dock, basin, or wet storage
facility constructed to
accommodate more than 10 boats
and providing any of the following
services: permanent or transient
docking spaces, dry storage fueling
facilities, haul out facilities, or
repair services. Excluded from this
definition are boat ramp facilities
that allow access only, temporary
docking that includes none of the
previous listed services, and
community boating facilities.
154
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 164
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Continue promotion of New Hanover County as a “no discharge zone” and promote the Clean Marina Program.
Prohibit floating home development where pump-out facilities or sewer connections are not available in order to
protect public trust and estuarine areas and to minimize risk of loss to persons and property.
Ensure the protection and preservation of undeveloped barrier and estuarine system islands by purchase or
dedication in order to restrict development, support research, and encourage passive recreation as their primary
uses.
Encourage connection to public water and sewer in environmentally sensitive areas to minimize potential
contamination from failing septic systems.
Encourage lower density development and/or alternatives to development (e.g.., acquisition through clean water
trust funds and grants) in ocean erodible areas, inlet hazard areas, high hazard flood areas, coastal and federally
regulated wetlands).
Encourage lower density development and/or alternatives to development (e.g., acquisition through clean water
trust funds and grants), and minimal impervious surface coverage within the 100-year floodplain (1% annual chance
floodplain). The following applies:
• Development projects may be allowed within the floodplain where adverse impacts to the estuarine system
can be shown to be negligible.
• Low intensity uses on a site, such as open space and passive recreation, may be appropriate in the
floodplain.
• Projects should comply with hierarchical principles of impact avoidance, minimization, and mitigation for
unavoidable impacts.
• Evaluate the need to develop standards for the protection of environmentally significant areas during
development and redevelopment.
Encourage preservation of existing natural wetlands and constructed wetlands as a stormwater mitigation
technique where practical.
Encourage preservation of existing natural buffer areas for conservation resources to preserve their natural
functions.
Continue efforts to preserve and restore shell fishing to SA waters and restore the water quality of non-supporting
surface waters to levels necessary to support their use designations.
Continue efforts to increase oversight of open burning activities.
155
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 165
Implementation Strategies
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Dredging activities in Primary Nursery Areas (PNA),
Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), and Shellfishing
Waters (SA) should be avoided except for scientific
and technical knowledge. Limited exceptions may
be allowed for the urban waterfront and
Wilmington’s ports, consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Cape Fear River Corridor Plan
(1997), the Wilmington Vision 2020 Plan (2004), and
other adopted plans and for inlet management
projects as permitted by the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Maintenance dredging may occur when
the following conditions exist:
• There exists a previously permitted channel
which was constructed or maintained under
permits issued by the State or Federal
Government. If a natural channel was in
use, or if a human-made channel was
constructed before permitting was
necessary, there shall be clear evidence that
the channel was continuously used for a
specific purpose; and
• Excavated material can be removed and
placed in an approved disposal area without
significantly impacting adjacent nursery
areas and beds of submerged aquatic
vegetation; and
• The original depth and width of a human-made channel or natural channel will not be increased to allow a
new or expanded use of the channel.
Protect water quality by prohibiting new and eliminating existing collection systems that directly discharge
stormwater to surface waters. Ensure that stormwater runoff from roadways does not directly discharge into
surface waters.
Map 5.1 Fishery Nursery Areas
Source: N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 2024
156
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 166
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Action Plan
The Action Plan identifies when implementation strategies will occur over the next 5 years and who will lead them
over the life of NHC Destination 2050. Actions are organized by timeframe to help guide priorities, align resources,
and track progress over time.
Immediate Term
Actions that can and should take place right away to launch plan implementation.
Short Term
Efforts that strengthen existing programs and establish the foundation for larger
initiatives. They are anticipated to commence within 1-2 years of plan adoption.
Medium Term
Actions that build on early successes and are expected to deliver significant
community impact. Some short-term actions are necessary before they can start.
Long Term
Initiatives that require additional resources, coordination, or readiness before
implementation so are anticipated in the 5+ year timeframe, but may advance
sooner as opportunities arise.
Ongoing
Activities that are already part of the county's continuing responsibilities and activities
and will remain integral to plan implementation.
Quality of Place Infrastructure &
Support Services
Environmental
Stewardship &
Resilience
Coordination &
Engagement
157
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 167
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Immediate Term Actions
Studies Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Update the NHC portion of regional hazard mitigation plan Emergency Management, Planning &
Land Use, Sustainability
• Develop Resilience Strategy for the Upper Smith Creek Watershed Sustainability Office, Planning & Land
Use, Engineering, Soil & Water
Code and Development Process Updates
• Reduce barriers to and incentivize the use of master planned
development tools
Planning & Land Use
• Develop standards to allow for the adaptive re-use of existing structures
for the types of commercial services intended for commercial corridors
Planning & Land Use
• Update requirements for traffic impact studies for master planned
developments to better support long-term planning
Planning & Land Use
• Strengthen the county’s CAMA program by ensuring that the CAMA
related policies and guidelines incorporated in this plan are considered
during the review of CAMA permits and in planning projects
Planning & Land Use
• Update planning staff reports to align with the Comprehensive Plan
update and increase stakeholder understanding of applications Planning & Land Use
158
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 168
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Immediate Term Actions
Programs Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Develop clear standards for development agreements to allow for
partnerships with private developers when appropriate to incorporate
future public facilities in master planned developments and to align
infrastructure timing with project build-out
Planning & Land Use, Legal,
Strategy
• Update water-sewer loan program to support residents’ and community
groups’ access to public water and sewer
Planning & Land Use, Health &
Human Services
Capital Investments
• Explore emerging digital technologies that can assess cumulative impacts
and identify projects to mitigate them
Planning & Land Use, IT
• Complete ongoing projects to provide new fire stations and library in
northern New Hanover County
Fire Rescue, Libraries, Facilities
Management
Administration
• Update ordinance standards tied to 2016 Comprehensive Plan place types Planning & Land Use
• Coordinate Coastal Resource Commission approval of NHC Destination
2050 as CAMA land use plan
Planning & Land Use
• Develop a framework for ongoing monitoring and reporting of
implementation progress
Planning & Land Use
159
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 169
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Short Term Actions
Studies Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Develop a plan for a connected network of parks, trails, greenways, water
access, and cultural facilities in coordination with the Parks Master Plan
update
Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land
Use
• Review NHC subdivision standards to identify opportunities to support
more resilient and sustainable infrastructure Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Fire Rescue, Emergency
Management
• Audit subdivision standards for street network design to ensure provisions
support emergency response Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Fire Rescue, Emergency
Management, Sheriff’s Department
• Develop an action plan to increase the county’s access to funding for
mitigation projects in adopted plans Planning & Land Use, Sustainability,
Emergency Management,
Engineering
• Audit existing conservation resource standards and procedures Planning & Land Use, Soil & Water,
Sustainability
• Finalize and publish data on conservation land and regulatory open space Planning & Land Use
• Develop a plan for connected open space in coordination with Parks
Master Plan update Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land
Use
• Work with the WMPO to develop a future roadway network plan for all of
unincorporated New Hanover County Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Fire Rescue, Emergency
Management
Code and Development Process Updates
• Update development standards to address the impacts of corridor
commercial development on adjacent residential developments
Planning & Land Use
• Update landscaping ordinances and guidelines to increase the use of
native vegetation and tree retention and to incorporate recommendations
for land with frequent flooding
Planning & Land Use, Soil & Water,
Sustainability, Cooperative Extension
• Update processes and guidelines for the administration of conservation
resource, tree retention, and other existing environmental standards to
make sure they work as intended
Planning & Land Use, Sustainability,
Legal, Soil & Water, Strategy
• Consider additional best practices or code updates to mitigate risk in flood
prone areas Planning & Land Use, Building Safety
• Update internal procedures for the development review and construction
process to increase transparency for residents and other stakeholders Planning & Land Use, Building Safety,
Engineering
160
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 170
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Short Term Actions
Programs Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Develop and implement a community planning program where staff can
work with residents on strategies and recommendations for community
development and placemaking opportunities
Planning & Land Use, Civic
Engagement
• Develop a community planning program that will provide more
opportunities for residents to provide perspectives outside of the
development review process
Planning & Land Use, Civic
Engagement
• Update public planning document templates with plain language and visual
aids
Planning & Land Use
• Expand public speaking and education activities on planning-related topics Planning & Land Use, Civic
Engagement
• Establish an organization-wide framework for demographic and spatial
data to support coordinated planning efforts and public communication
Planning & Land Use, Strategy, IT,
Communications, Emergency
Management, Fire Rescue, Sheriff’s
Department
Capital Investments
• Incorporate risk tolerance framework into the analysis, prioritization, and
approval of capital projects
Strategy, Finance
Partnerships
• Coordinate with NHCS on student population data and planning for new
facilities aligned with the Future Land Use Map
Planning & Land Use
161
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 171
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Medium Term Actions
Studies Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Identify key gateway areas into the county along corridors and develop
design recommendations for those locations Planning & Land Use
• Finalize and publish maps showing the maintenance status of roadways in
the unincorporated county Planning & Land Use
• Model the future functional classification of roadways to inform future
transportation project submittals and development standards Planning & Land Use
• Develop and implement a green infrastructure plan that identifies a
network of natural lands and open spaces to support biodiversity and
wildlife protection in addition to recreation and transportation
Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Sustainability, Soil & Water, Parks
& Gardens
• Develop interactive and accessible online tools (maps, storyboards,
dashboards) that allow residents to explore data and test land use
scenarios
Planning & Land Use, IT
• Develop a conservation land priorities plan Soil & Water, Sustainability, Parks
& Gardens
Code and Development Process Updates
• Update and/or develop building, sign, and site design standards for
development along key roadway corridors Planning & Land Use
• Develop guidelines and incentives for plazas and other open space as part
of new commercial and mixed use development Planning & Land Use
• Update local standards for access, connectivity and street network design
in coordination with NCDOT and WMPO
Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Fire Rescue
• Work with property owners of residentially zoned land located along
identified commercial corridors to rezone properties Planning & Land Use
• Update standards for street network design as identified in the subdivision
standards audit Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Fire Rescue
• Consider updates to the Special Highway Overlay District (SHOD) or other
zoning tools or development standards to proactively prepare for future
roadway projects Planning & Land Use
162
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 172
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Medium Term Actions
Code and Development Process Updates Goal(s)
Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Develop canopy-based tree retention ordinance or options Planning & Land Use, Sustainability.
• Strengthen existing open space standards and develop incentives to
increase the connectivity and ecological value of open space areas Planning & Land Use, Soil & Water,
Sustainability
• Establish standards and/or incentives for protective buffers along rivers,
creeks, wetlands, and estuaries to filter runoff and maintain water quality
Engineering, Soil & Water,
Sustainability
163
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 173
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Long Term Actions
Studies Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Outline age-friendly community designs to provide guidance and
recommendations for developers
Planning & Land Use, Senior Resource
Center
• Develop guidelines for development designs that enhance public safety Planning & Land Use, Sheriff’s
Department, Fire Rescue
• Work with regional partners to develop and publish regional data sets Planning & Land Use
Programs
• Consider programs to support the rehabilitation of aging housing and
commercial structures Planning & Land Use, Building Safety
• Develop educational resources for HOAs related to infrastructure
maintenance responsibilities10 Planning & Land Use, Engineering
Capital Investments
• Revitalize waterfront parks and public spaces to encourage opportunities
for formal and informal social gatherings
Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land Use
Administration
• Prepare for 2029-2030 Comprehensive Plan update Planning & Land Use
164
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 174
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Ongoing Actions
Studies Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Develop watershed plans to address water quality concerns in county
creeks and waterways Planning & Land Use, Sustainability, Soil
& Water, Engineering
Code and Development Process Updates
• Incorporate ongoing and regular maintenance updates to UDO Planning & Land Use
• Continue clarifying and updating ordinance provisions so they support
residents’ understanding of the planning process and zoning
administration
Planning & Land Use
• Require new developments along roadways with planned bicycle and
pedestrian features outlined on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority
Project map to provide an easement for future multi-use trails
Planning & Land Use
• Continue to ensure drainage from land use activities has a rate of flow
and volume characteristics as near to predevelopment conditions as
possible
Engineering
Programs
• Support placemaking initiatives such as pop-up markets, street festivals,
and mobile community services that celebrate local culture and bring
residents together
Civic Engagement
• Regularly review and update development standards in the UDO to
ensure they support desired industries and development patterns and
are responsive to emerging needs
Planning & Land Use
• Promote and market existing greenspace, active transportation
networks, and community recreational facilities
Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land Use
• Host county-sponsored engagement meetings in multiple formats to
increase accessibility
Planning & Land Use, Civic Engagement,
Communications
• Maintain and regularly update a user-friendly webpage or planning
portal that explains planning processes, ongoing initiatives, and how to
be involved
Planning & Land Use, Communications
• Continue Soil & Water programs that support green infrastructure,
agricultural water conservation, and non-point source pollution
reduction
• Continue efforts to increase oversight of open burning activities
Soil & Water
CAMA Fire Rescue, Health & Human
Services
165
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 175
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Ongoing Actions
Capital Investments Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Invest in parks, trails, greenways, water access, and connecting
networks as outlined in network plan and Parks Master Plan
Parks & Gardens
• Incorporate multimodal improvements along corridors to improve
resident access
Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land Use
• Consider projects to design and construct water and sewer utilities for
communities most in need
Strategy, Health & Human Services,
Planning & Land Use
• Invest in public facilities and programs that support physical, mental,
and social engagement opportunities
Health & Human Services, Civic
Engagement, Strategy, Senior Resource
Center, Libraries, Parks & Gardens
• Invest in public facilities and programs that support emergency services
and community safety
Fire Rescue, Emergency Management,
Sheriff’s Department
• Pursue funding for projects identified in regional hazard mitigation
plans
Emergency Management, Sustainability,
Engineering
• Pursue funding for projects identified in The Resilience Strategy for the
Upper Smith Creek Watershed
Soil & Water, Sustainability, Engineering
• Pursue funding for projects identified in the Pages Creek Restoration
Plan
Soil & Water, Sustainability, Engineering
• Continue investments in stormwater maintenance as part of the county
Stormwater Services Program
Engineering
Partnerships
• Continue working with partners to conserve land on the Western Bank Soil & Water, Sustainability
• Coordinate with NHC Schools, City of Wilmington, and other community
partners on plans for and investment in parks and other recreational
amenities
Parks & Gardens
• Work with WMPO, NCDOT, and other partners on obtaining funding for
multimodal connectivity
Parks & Gardens, Planning & Land Use
• Partner with nonprofits, business associations, and cultural
organizations to activate public spaces with programming that reflects
the county’s diversity and heritage
Parks & Gardens, Civic Engagement
166
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 176
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Ongoing Actions
Partnerships Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Coordinate with CFPUA to prioritize and implement water and sewer
investments that support economic development and neighborhood
stability
Planning & Land Use, Strategy
• Strengthen working relationships with Duke Progress and other private
utility providers to coordinate planning efforts and ensure that
residents have access to needed utilities
Planning & Land Use
• Work with the WMPO to incorporate transportation projects identified
in this plan into WMPO planning documents
Planning & Land Use
• Work with WMPO, NCDOT, and other partners to obtain funding for
transportation projects that will support anticipated future development
needs
Planning & Land Use
• Coordinate with NCDOT, WMPO, and utility providers to align corridor
investments with regional transportation and infrastructure plans
Planning & Land Use
• Continue working with WBD, WDI, County Tourism, the Chamber of
Commerce, and others to increase diversity and resiliency of the local
economy
Strategy
• Coordinate with the WMPO and WAVE to expand access to transit
services to residents in the unincorporated county
Planning & Land Use
• Continue workforce partnerships with educational institutions and
nonprofits
Strategy
• Coordinate with community partners on planning for support services
and facilities aligned with Future Land Use Map
Planning & Land Use
• Continue partnerships with Alliance for Cape Fear Trees, Lower Cape
Fear River Program, Masonboro Local Action Committee, and others to
leverage common efforts to achieve shared goals
Planning & Land Use, Sustainability, Soil
& Water, Parks & Gardens
• Coordinate with CFPUA to prioritize and implement water and sewer
investments that reduce the environmental impacts of private wells and
septic systems
Planning & Land Use, Strategy,
Engineering, Health & Human Services
• Coordinate with CFPUA, NC DEQ, and regional partners to monitor
emerging contaminants and implement best management practices
Health & Human Services
167
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 177
Action Plan
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Ongoing Actions
Partnerships Goal(s) Primary NHC
Departments Involved
• Support long-term planning for water and sewer infrastructure to align
with projected growth and ensure sufficient supply
Planning & Land Use, Engineering,
Health & Human Services
• Pursue land conservation partnerships to preserve critical habitat and
natural resource lands, particularly in floodplains and recharge areas
Planning & Land Use, Sustainability, Soil
& Water
• Strengthen relationships with planning and development-related staff in
adjacent jurisdictions to allow for ongoing regional coordination
Planning & Land Use
• Support cross-jurisdictional initiatives to address shared community
challenges
Planning & Land Use
• Expand partnerships with community groups, nonprofit organizations,
and other local governments to identify projects and leverage efforts
Planning & Land Use, Civic Engagement,
Strategy
• Work with City of Wilmington to update guidelines, procedures, and
interlocal agreements for annexations
Planning & Land Use
• Build relationships with HOA representatives Planning & Land Use
• Coordinate with partner agencies on planning engagement to address
cross-jurisdictional questions or concerns
Planning & Land Use
Administration
• Monitor and report on implementation progress and key measures Planning & Land Use
168
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 178
Measures
Chapter 5 Building the Future
Measures
The measures outlined in this section establish a framework for continuously tracking conditions, evaluating
progress, and identifying when strategies may need to be recalibrated. By grounding regular plan updates in clear,
data-driven indicators, the county can ensure its policies remain responsive, effective, and aligned with long-term
community goals. A report outlining baseline measures and identifying targets will be one of the first staff
implementation actions after local adoption of the plan and will support future monitoring and Board updates.
Quality of Place
Goal: Create vibrant lasting places by balancing local character with future needs
• Percentage of Corridor Commercial designated parcels zoned or approved for commercial uses
• Number of rezoning or TRC approvals for adaptive reuse & commercial uses in
Commercial Corridor designated places
• Number of Master Planned Developments approved
• Miles of trails and/or sidewalks in unincorporated county
Infrastructure & Support Services
Goal: Support long-term community needs through fiscally responsible growth, infrastructure,
and services
• Percentage of homes with public water, public sewer
• Length of new water/sewer infrastructure constructed
• Number of priority transportation projects funded in STIP (biannual)
• Ratio of NCDOT-maintained vs. privately maintained roads
Environmental Stewardship & Resilience
Goal: Promote stewardship of natural resources and strengthen coastal resilience
• Percentage of tree canopy by community area
• Acres of conservation land
• Acres of regulatory open space
• Number of lots (homes) in FEMA SFHAs and NHC advisory flood areas
• Percentage of new open space designed to connect with existing open space
Coordination & Engagement
Goal: Strengthen collaboration and engagement to guide community planning
• Number of planning outreach and engagement events
• Number of planning stakeholder presentations
• Number of updates to website
• Number of regional partnerships supported by county staff
169
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 179
This page has been left intentionally blank
DR
A
F
T
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 2 - 180
NHC Destination 2050 – Response to Public Comments
Building on the foundation established by the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, NHC Destination 2050 represents the collective efforts of residents, community partners,
elected and appointed officials, and County staff.
An initial draft of the NHC Destination 2050 update was released for public review on November 19, 2025. The draft was made available online and in hard copy at the
New Hanover County Government Center, New Hanover County Libraries, the Cape Fear Museum, and the Senior Resource Center. The public comment period closed
on December 19, 2025. During the four-week public comment period, staff received a total of 32 public comments, including 25 submitted through the project website
6 received via email, and 1 comment received from Pine Valley Library.
Given their common themes, and divergent perspectives, public comments were reviewed, categorized by theme, and evaluated by staff. They reflected both shared
priorities and clear tensions regarding future growth and development. While many commenters expressed strong support for policies included in the plan regarding
environmental protection, tree canopy preservation, and improved walkability, others raised concerns that the draft plan allows too much flexibility for new
development or, conversely, constrains infill and mixed-use development in areas with existing infrastructure. These differing perspectives underscore the challenge of
balancing growth management, environmental resilience, and housing and economic needs within the County’s statutory authority. They also highlight areas of the
plan where the rationale for decisions and constraints in local authority have shaped recommendations, as well as components that should be clarified, as commenters
have asked for policies that had already been included in the draft.
The following summary outlines the key themes raised and explains how the comments were considered in preparing the draft for the Planning Board public hearing
on NHC Destination 2050. Staff made changes to the plan to clarify language and correct information but avoided modifying components subject to previous Board of
Commissioner policy guidance; however, individual comments are provided separately in the meeting agenda packet so they can inform the Board’s final consideration
of the plan. Responses were focused on clarifying plan intent, documenting where changes were made and explaining how comments that extend beyond the scope or
authority of the Comprehensive Plan will inform future work.
What We Heard Response and Impact to the Planning Board Public Hearing Draft
Public comments reflected divergent views on future growth
and development in New Hanover County.
Some commenters expressed concern that the draft plan
does not go far enough in limiting growth. These comments
emphasized the county’s geographic constraints as a coastal
peninsula, citing cumulative impacts on infrastructure,
flooding, tree canopy, wetlands, and quality of life. Several
commenters urged the county to prioritize conservation,
limit or slow development, and avoid zoning changes that
could increase density in already stressed areas.
Other commenters supported the overall policy direction of
the plan but requested clearer guardrails, stronger
language, and more measurable outcomes to ensure that
growth occurs in a manner consistent with infrastructure
capacity, environmental protection, and long-term
resilience.
In contrast, a smaller but notable set of comments
expressed concern that the plan may constrain infill
development too much, particularly in areas with existing
roads, utilities, services, and transit access. These
commenters suggested that limiting density in infill and
corridor areas could unintentionally push development
outward, increase traffic, and reduce housing affordability.
NHC Destination 2050 is an update to the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, which established a new
vision for unincorporated New Hanover County, in recognition that past policies has pushed
residential growth to Pender and Brunswick Counties, created a sprawling development pattern
that used a lot of land for small numbers of people, and located basic goods and services further
from the residents who needed to access them—all of which increased the amount of traffic on
the county’s major corridors. As a result, the 2016 Plan called for a greater mix of uses and
provided for additional residential density and a greater diversity of housing types. Over the
past nine years, the community’s access to different forms of housing and commercial services
has indeed increased.
While providing for a mix of uses and opportunities for new homes remains important in
ensuring that the community’s workforce and quality of life remain strong, the draft plan reflects
policy guidance from the Board of Commissioners and is intended to increase the county’s
planning focus on the necessary infrastructure, services, natural resources, and amenities that
will continue to support our prosperity. The development recommendations outlined in the
Future Land Use Map and additional considerations in Chapter 4 reflect this by focusing new
mixed use and residential development where supporting infrastructure is most feasible (large
parcels in the north that can be master planned), recommending existing residential zoning stay
in place in areas of the county where transportation connectivity is least likely to occur (southern
part of the county and along the water), and prioritizing commercial services along major
corridors where they can take advantage of existing drive-by traffic.
Continuous planning is necessary so the community can adapt to changing conditions, so this
plan also incorporates a new monitoring and update framework that includes clear measures,
outlined in Chapter 5, regular reports to the Board of Commissioners, and planned 5-year
updates.
Staff has updated the Future Land Use Map to reflect recent development decisions along Las
Tortugas Dr., community development work in Scotts Hill east of the I-140/Hwy 17 interchange,
and to reflect existing development patterns near North Chase, as they are intended to reflect
past Board of Commissioner decisions and technical considerations. No policy-related
adjustments have been made.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 1
What We Heard Response and Impact to the Planning Board Public Hearing Draft
A number of comments emphasized the importance of
preserving New Hanover County’s natural landscape and
strengthening environmental protections as growth
continues.
Commenters consistently raised concerns about tree loss,
limited vegetation along roadways, and insufficient buffering
between new development and adjacent properties. Many
urged stronger tree retention requirements, wider vegetated
buffers, enhanced landscaping standards for commercial
development, and stricter limits on clearing, particularly near
wetlands and environmentally sensitive areas. Several
commenters specifically encouraged adoption or alignment
with updated tree canopy and preservation standards
proposed by the Alliance for Cape Fear Trees.
Environmental concerns were frequently linked to flooding
risk, water quality, habitat loss, and long-term community
health, with commenters emphasizing that meaningful tree
and vegetation conservation plays a critical role in resilience
and quality of life.
These considerations were key priorities for the Board of Commissioners, and NHC Destination
2050 establishes environmental stewardship and resilience as core guiding principles for future
land use and development. The Environmental Stewardship and Resilience goal theme most
directly addresses these plan areas, though the Quality of Place goal also addresses them, as
the community has clearly shown how green space is tied to both environmental impacts and
community character. The plan promotes context-sensitive development, enhanced
landscaping, meaningful vegetated buffers, and strengthened tree canopy preservation.
The draft plan includes objectives related to sustaining a healthy and diverse tree canopy and
connected ecosystems and expanding and improving open space. These objectives will be the
basis for the development of targets for tree canopy percentages, acres of conservation land,
amount of regulatory open space, and open space connectivity as outlined in the plan’s
Measures section. They also lay the groundwork for the development of specific plans for open
space and conservation land; will lead to identified code and development process updates
related to landscaping, open space, and conservation resources; and outline ongoing programs
to support tree preservation. Specific standard updates and changes, such as those suggested
in the comments, would be identified, vetted, and formally considered as part of those
implementation actions.
Provisions that support environmental stewardship are also built into the Future Land Use Map,
with the Conservation place type revisions that more directly promote full conservation of land
with that classification and the provisions outlined for the Riverfront Conservation classification.
Because the NHC Destination 2050 draft already included a number of provisions that addressed
comments, staff focused on clarifying the narrative sections on how the plan would be
implemented and the framework for ongoing monitoring of data. The plan supports continued
evaluation and refinement of tree protection and canopy standards, open space conservation,
and development standards for environmentally sensitive areas to ensure they are effective and
aligned with best practices.
Flooding and stormwater management emerged as a central
theme across multiple comments. Commenters expressed
concern that the plan does not go far enough in addressing
flood risk given the county’s coastal location, flat
topography, high water table, and increasing frequency of
intense rainfall events.
Feedback raised concerns about infrastructure capacity,
flooding risk, and the cumulative impacts of development in
a coastal peninsula with finite natural buffers, highlighting
the critical role of wetlands in flood protection, water quality,
and wildlife habitat.
Additional comments stressed that major infrastructure and
dredging projects should be carefully evaluated for
environmental and public health impacts, especially in light
of sea level rise, increase storm intensity, and existing water
quality concerns. They stated that conservation, canopy
protection, and environmental safeguards should take
precedence over continued high-density development to
protect community health, safety, and long-term resilience.
Flooding and stormwater were also key priorities for the Board of Commissioners, reflecting the
concerns noted by commenters and the community’s experiences since the adoption of the 2016
Comprehensive Plan. These areas are primarily addressed in the plan’s Environmental
Stewardship and Resilience goal theme, though hazard-sensitive design is also called for under
Infrastructure and Support Services.
The draft plan outlines a series of policies that will inform Board decisions about capital
investments, organizational work plans, and future development that are intended to address
the concerns outlined in the comments, In addition, multiple implementation actions are
outlined related to hazard mitigation planning, updates to regulations for flood prone areas,
engineering requirements based on site-specific conditions, flood risk education programs,
capital investments for mitigation projects identified in ongoing planning efforts, and land
conservation.
Because the NHC Destination 2050 draft already included a number of provisions that addressed
comments, staff focused on clarifying the role of the Natural Systems Considerations in
conjunction with place type recommendations. Based on the comments received, it may not
have been clear that the place type recommendations are intended to work in coordination with
the other future land use considerations in Chapter 4 when decisions are made about future
development subject to legislative review.
Two action items included in the draft plan also address concerns about the relationship
between soil type and development. The plan calls for continuing to ensure that drainage has
a rate of flow and volume characteristics as near to predevelopment conditions as possible. It
also aims to consider additional best practices to mitigate risk in flood prone areas. These
provisions do not directly mention soil type, but that is one of the components that is considered
under county stormwater regulations, impacting the ultimate development of sites.
Modifications were not made to the plan related to concerns about current soil data. This
information is generally not produced by the county and is only one source of information used
within the development review and stormwater permitting process. Site-specific soil data can
be required and provided if there is evidence that the existing soil survey is not representative
of actual site conditions. The implementation strategy regarding stormwater maintenance was
also not modified, as other capital investments identified under Environmental Stewardship &
Resilience do comprise enhancements in this and other hazard mitigation efforts and to reduce
the likelihood that the implementation strategy is seen as a call for increasing stormwater
service fees, which is beyond the scope of this plan.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 2
What We Heard Response and Impact to the Planning Board Public Hearing Draft
Public comments included questions and concerns related to
place type classifications and how they were applied to
properties.
Several commenters requested clearer explanation of the
intent, scale, and expectations associated with specific place
types, particularly Infill Residential and Resilient Mixed Use.
One comment specifically asked questions about how the
Resilient Mixed Use designation differs from other mixed use
categories and how it accounts for flooding risk,
infrastructure capacity, and existing neighborhood context.
Other comments suggested that certain place types could be
applied more broadly to better support reinvestment and
walkable development, while also expressing concern that
density ranges and recommended uses may not be
appropriate in environmentally sensitive or constrained
areas. Overall, the feedback reflects a desire for greater
clarity, differentiation, and transparency in how place types
guide future development.
Unlike the future land use classification used in Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) plans
prior to the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, place types are not a reflection of site-specific
constraints; instead, they are intended to represent the general character, intensity, and
function desired for future development and are primarily used when changes to development
regulations—most specifically rezonings—are considered. They are intended to provide some
flexibility and broad recommendations so that other considerations, like those outlined in
Chapter 4, can also inform those types of policy decisions.
As outlined in the NHC Destination 2050 draft, the 2016 Comprehensive Plan envisioned a mix
of uses over much of the unincorporated county. Over the last nine years, a greater mix of
uses has emerged, with increased housing diversity and basic goods and services located close
to where people live. This has been aided by market forces, and future market conditions were
considered when developing the future land use map updates included in the plan draft.
Technical studies indicated that a true mixture of uses as envisioned in 2016 is not likely in all
places across the county over the coming years and that a strong residential market will remain.
As result, keeping current mixed use recommendations in the plan would likely result in ongoing
requests for rezonings for higher density residential projects, even in parts of the county with a
less urban/suburban character and limited roadway connectivity. Infill Residential place type
recommendations are intended to articulate a policy desire to maintain current zoning
designations in these types of residential areas. Corridor Commercial recommendations are
applied to major roadway corridors, so in conjunction with current and planned residential
development, the ultimate mix of uses envisioned in 2016 can be achieved and future
commercial sites retained.
Community Mixed Use place type recommendations were outlined for larger parcels in the
northern portion of the county where future infrastructure that supports higher levels of density
can be provided as part of master planned developments. Recommendations for density and
intensity are in line with what is outlined for Community Mixed Use and Urban Mixed Use areas
in the 2016 Plan, though those recommendations are intentionally high level so costs for
providing roadway and utility infrastructure can be balanced with the ultimate development
density and intensity that will be a component in Board consideration of the rezoning requests
necessary for these types of projects.
The areas where this place type is applied are similar in the types of environmental constraints
that will impact future development. There were a few areas of the county, however, where a
mix of uses may be possible based on property size, infrastructure availability, or current zoning,
and unique environmental conditions and other contextual features are also present.
Specifically, in the Seabreeze area, current commercial zoning, combined with limited utilities,
flood risks, and changing conservation impacts, require a closer look, so a Resilient Mixed Use
place type was applied to the area to note this, and additional considerations for future
community planning efforts for the area were also outlined.
Place type descriptions and information on the framework for the Future Land Use Map were
updated to clarify the plan intent in response to these comments, but no changes to the map
were made in response to these comments. More detailed maps outlining the rationale for all
changes in the plan were also included in the appendix.
Public comments expressed strong support for the plan’s
emphasis on alternative transportation, walkability, and
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.
At the same time, commenters raised concerns about gaps,
discontinuities, and design challenges within the planned
bicycle and pedestrian network, noting that incomplete or
indirect routes can reduce safety and usability. Several
comments emphasized the importance of designing facilities
that reflect real-work travel behavior and minimize
unnecessary crossings or conflicts.
Additional transportation-related comments focused on
traffic congestion associated with school drop-off and pick-
up, particularly where school-related queues spill onto public
roads. Commenters encouraged improved coordination
between school planning, roadway design, and surrounding
development to address safety and operational issues.
Transportation was a key priority identified by the Board of Commissioners to be emphasized in
NHC Destination 2050. As described in Chapter 1, the framework for transportation planning
for counties in North Carolina limits the role of county governments and requires ongoing
coordination with partner organizations. NHC Destination 2050 seeks to address the resulting
challenges through an integrated approach to land use planning, transportation coordination,
and public facility planning, while clearly recognizing each partner’s responsibilities.
The resulting plan includes multiple transportation-related components, including Roadway
Priority Projects and Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Projects maps; recommendations for future
street networks associated with new development; a Quality of Place objective and associated
policies to increase connectivity between neighborhoods, corridors, and destinations; and a
variety of plans, code updates, capital projects, and partnerships to better coordinate
transportation infrastructure with land use planning.
Because a number of plan provisions already addressed transportation connectivity and
infrastructure improvements, in addition to correcting the gap shown on the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Priority Projects map and the intersection improvement not included in the Roadway
Priority Projects map, staff focused on clarifying summaries about the county’s transportation
framework in Chapter 1, updated public transit recommendations to specify ongoing support
for Wave, and in coordination with WMPO staff, modified the proposed implementation
strategies to include a coordinated street network plan as a short-term initiative. Specific
concerns have been noted and will be considered during the future updates of code provisions.
No specific modifications were made in response to future passenger rail as it had not been
previously identified or discussed as a Board priority as part of this planning process. It has
been considered, however, in the WMPO’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 3
What We Heard Response and Impact to the Planning Board Public Hearing Draft
Comments reflected strong support for healthy resident
lifestyles, related to access to parks and recreation
amenities, particularly neighborhood-scale parks that are
walkable and publicly accessible, as well as high-quality
healthcare.
Several commenters raised concerns that reliance on HOA-
owned amenities limits access for some residents and
suggested expanding the availability of small neighborhood
parks, playgrounds, and recreation facilities. Requests were
also made for specific facilities, including year-round aquatic
centers and expanded recreational programming.
Some comments extended to healthcare and hospital
services, expressing concern about service quality and
capacity as the county grows. Commenters emphasized a
desire for high-quality, accessible healthcare options and
raised questions about the long-term resilience of the local
healthcare system in light of continued population growth.
Access to community recreational amenities and health services is an important component of
the county’s work; however, the Comprehensive Plan with its focus on future land use and
development patterns is not the primary planning document for future recreational amenities
or health care facilities.
The parks and recreation related considerations in NHC Destination 2050 are intended to be
higher level and feed into subsequent Parks and Gardens plans, such as the master plan
referenced in Chapter 5’s implementation strategies. Considerations regarding the size and type
of public recreational amenities will be included in that future initiative.
Similarly, as New Hanover County does not regulate health care operations, these types of
considerations generally fall under the Community Safety & Well-Being component of the county
Strategic Plan and within the purview of Health & Human Services. NHC Destination 2050 does
use population growth projects, age cohort trends, and service demand analysis to inform future
planning and provides a long range framework to help ensure future land use patterns and
public facilities align with the county’s changing demographics, including a growing and aging
population. This is reflected in ongoing implementation partnerships to coordinate land use
planning with facility needs, but it only addresses health care at a high level.
No changes to the draft plan were made in response to these comments, but they will be
provided to the Board of Commissioners so they can be considered in other county initiatives
as appropriate.
Several commenters expressed concern that higher-density
housing patterns contribute to crowding, traffic congestion,
and reduced neighborhood character, while others
emphasized the importance of providing diverse housing
options, including infill and workforce housing, to support
affordability and reduce spawl. Comments noted the
interconnected nature of housing, transportation, wages,
and access to services.
Housing form and affordability have been key topics of public feedback for several years, and
as previously noted, the draft plan seeks to provide opportunities for new housing in areas
where supportive roadway infrastructure is most feasible, while prioritizing community character
in areas with smaller undeveloped parcels, which are often closer to existing neighborhoods.
These policies are intended to result in additional housing units that can address ongoing
residential demand while strengthening the county’s focus on important quality of life
considerations over the coming years.
Because these comments address Board of Commissioner policy guidance, no adjustments to
the draft plan have been made.
One comment was provided regarding air and light pollution,
which were topics not addressed by other commenters. It
called for improved oversight on open burning practices, the
implementation of vegetative buffers to naturally filter air
pollutants, and expressed support for dimmer, warmer
street lighting.
While Chapter 1 includes a summary of air quality considerations, including open burning, the
draft plan did not directly address lighting or light pollution. In January 2025, the Board of
Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution brought forward by Fire Rescue to begin the
process of requesting that the unincorporated county receive a High Hazard Classification from
the state, a method of increasing oversight over open burning. However, neither this topic nor
lighting related policies were previously identified for inclusion in this plan.
The air quality considerations do not clearly fall under the goals or objectives established
previously by the Board of Commissioners and outlined in Chapter 5, but air quality is outlined
as a CAMA-related goal in Chapter 4 under the Natural Systems Considerations. As a result, an
ongoing implementation strategy has been added to reflect the work that the Board of
Commissioners have already supported, and a description of that work has been added to the
plan narrative.
Since New Hanover County does not provide or regulate street lighting, that topic is not
specifically addressed in the plan. The county does regulate site lighting, so the comments can
be considered during the site design standards update identified as an implementation action
under the Quality of Place goal theme.
These and other emerging concerns can also be brought forward as part of the community
planning program initiative that is outlined in the plan, which is intended to support the county’s
ability to continue to adapt in response to community concerns.
Commenters raised questions about the clarity, accuracy,
and currency of maps, charts, and supporting data in the
draft plan. Specific concerns included small or difficult-to-
read maps, labeling issues, and the use of data that may not
reflect the most recent conditions or projections.
Several comments also emphasized the importance of
ongoing monitoring, measurable goals, and accountability,
expressing a desire for clearer benchmarks and mechanisms
to track progress over time.
Data collection for NHC Destination 2050 largely ended in early 2025 to allow existing conditions
information to inform the policy recommendations of the plan; this means that some data
sources’ most recent information was dated 2023 due to the timing of when Census data is
published.
In response to public comments, staff re-reviewed the Existing Conditions information in
Chapter 1, made corrections or updates when possible, clarified the reason for specific data
sources when feasible, and enlarged maps. Full-scale maps are now included in the appendix.
In addition, the narrative detailing how the plan will be monitored using the measures outlined
in Chapter 5, along with the immediate-term identification of targets, has been updated to
provide greater clarity for readers of the plan.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 3 - 4
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 2
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 3
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 4
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 5
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 6
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 7
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 8
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 9
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 10
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 11
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 12
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 13
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 14
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 15
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 16
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 17
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 18
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 19
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 20
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 21
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 22
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 23
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 24
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 25
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 26
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 27
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 28
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 29
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 30
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 31
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 32
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 33
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 34
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 35
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 36
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 37
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 38
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 39
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 40
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 41
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 42
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 43
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 44
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 45
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 46
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 47
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 48
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 49
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 50
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 51
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 52
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 53
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 54
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 55
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 56
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 57
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 58
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 59
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 60
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 61
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 62
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 63
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 64
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 65
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 66
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 67
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 68
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 69
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 70
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 71
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 72
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 73
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 74
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 75
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 76
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 77
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 78
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 79
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 80
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 81
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 82
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 83
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 84
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 85
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 86
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 87
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 88
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 89
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 90
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 91
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 92
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 93
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 94
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 95
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 96
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 97
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 98
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 99
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 100
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 101
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 102
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 103
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 104
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 105
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 106
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 107
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 108
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 109
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 3 - 4 - 110
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/8/2026
Regular
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Director of Planning & Land Use
CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing
Text Amendment Request (TA25-05) - Request by New Hanover County to amend the Unified Development
Ordinance Ar;cles 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 to update references to the Comprehensive Plan place types, designate the
Riverfront Mixed Use zoning district as a legacy district, modify transporta;on-related applica;on requirements
for PD rezonings, incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct an unintended conflict included in the
recent sign standards ordinance amendment.
BRIEF SUMMARY:
This ordinance amendment is presented as a companion to the NHC Desnaon 2050 Comprehensive Plan update.
Certain Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) standards reference Comprehensive Plan place types, and adop%ng
the plan without a concurrent UDO update could result in unintended regulatory impacts. This amendment aligns with
the updated plan, ini%ates early implementa%on ac%ons, incorporates recent changes to state law, and corrects a
conflic%ng provision included in the recent TA25-04 sign standards update.
A dra. amendment was released on December 8, 2025, following a presenta%on to the Planning Board on December
4, 2025. One public comment was received prior to the close of the comment period on December 29, 2025 and is
included in the mee%ng packet. The comment supported proposed changes to Transporta%on Impact Analysis (TIA)
requirements for Planned Development districts and iden%fied addi%onal UDO sec%ons that conflicted with SL 2025-
94. Those sec%ons have been addressed in the public hearing dra..
Staff also con%nued coordina%on with Wilmington Urban Area MPO (WMPO) staff to refine the transporta%on
network plan requirements. In response to their review, the updated dra. clarifies when TIAs would be required for
Planned Developments, how informa%on for the transporta%on network plan is sourced and verified, and how the
materials are reviewed. These submi8als would be reviewed by NCDOT and WMPO as part of the standard rezoning
review process, with agency comments incorporated into the staff report and made available for public review.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and has provided a suggested mo%on of approval in the
a8ached Script.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip%on
TA25-05 Script - Planning Board
TA25-05 Staff Report - Planning Board
TA25-05 - Amendment Summary
TA25-05 - Planning Board Public Hearing Draft
TA25-05 Transportation Network Plan Submittal Requirements - Planning Board
Public Comments Cover Sheet
TA25-05 Public Comments
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4
SCRIPT for Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment (TA25-05)
Request by New Hanover County to amend the Unified Development Ordinance Articles 2, 3, 4,
5, and 10 to update references to the Comprehensive Plan place types, designate the Riverfront
Mixed Use zoning district as a legacy district, modify transportation-related application
requirements for PD rezonings, incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct an
unintended conflict included in the recent sign standards ordinance amendment.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then any supporters and
opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes
for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponents’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Staff rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponents’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
3. Close the public hearing
4. Board Discussion (including questions for staff)
5. Vote on amendment. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not,
consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest.
Example Motion of Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed amendment the Unified Development Ordinance
to update references to Comprehensive Plan place types, begin implementation of the NHC Destination
2050 Comprehensive Plan update, incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct a conflicting
provision in the sign standards. I find it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016
Comprehensive Plan and 2026 NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan because it will support the
use of zoning tools that will allow for coordinated land use and infrastructure planning, limit the use of
tools that are not aligned with plan policies, and maintain consistency with state law. I find
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL to be reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed
amendment will allow for a common understanding of local authority under state law and begin
implementation of key provisions in the 2026 NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to recommend [Approval/Denial] of the proposed amendment to the New Hanover County Unified
Development Ordinance. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
I also find [Approval/Denial] of the proposed amendment is reasonable and in the public interest because
[insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1
TA25-03 Staff Report PB 2.6.2025 Page 1 of 5
STAFF REPORT OF TA25-04
TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION
APPLICATION SUMMARY
Case Number: TA25-05
Request:
To amend the Unified Development Ordinance Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 to update
references to the Comprehensive Plan place types, designate the Riverfront Mixed Use
zoning district as a legacy district, modify transportation-related application requirements
for PD rezonings, incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct an unintended
conflict included in the recent sign standards ordinance amendment.
Applicant: Subject Ordinance:
New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO)
Subject Article(s) and Section(s):
Article 2: Measurements and Definitions
Article 3: Zoning Districts
Article 4: Uses and Use Specific Standards
Article 5: General Development Standards
Article 10: Administrative Procedures
BACKGROUND & STAFF ANALYSIS
This amendment is being brought forward as a companion to the consideration of the NHC
Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update, primarily because the Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) specifically references Comprehensive Plan place types in some standards
that could create unintended impacts if the plan were adopted without a concurrent
amendment. The amendment also provides an opportunity to begin the plan implementation
process, incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct a conflicting provision
unintentionally included in the recently adopted TA25-04 sign standards update amendment.
Comprehensive Plan Companion Component- Place Type References
Currently, the UDO links a few density standards to Comprehensive Plan place types, and
state law limits local governments’ ability to modify these types of standards without the
impacted property owner’s permission. Proposed changes in the draft Destination 2050 plan
would limit allowable density and intensity for some properties, requiring the UDO be updated
as well.
In preparation for the Destination 2050 adoption process, staff reviewed current standards in
coordination with the county attorney’s office. It was determined that references to the
Conservation and Rural Residential place types would not impact property owners who have
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 1
TA25-03 Staff Report PB 2.6.2025 Page 2 of 5
not already placed their properties into conservation status. Recommendations for the areas
where those place types are applied are largely consistent with the 2016 Plan.
Changes proposed to how Employment Center and Community Mixed Use place types are
applied, as well as the removal of the Urban Mixed Use place type from the plan, would impact
properties, however. Standards linked to these place types are currently only included for
uses that require Board of Commissioner approval. As a result, staff is proposing that these
place type-related standards be removed from the UDO, allowing the Board of Commissioners
to determine whether a particular use or density is appropriate based on the policy guidance
of the plan.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation Component – Riverfront Mixed Use (RFMU) District
The Riverfront Mixed Use (RFMU) District was created to specifically support mixed use
development on the Western Bank that mirrored the pattern of development across the river
in downtown Wilmington. With the 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendment adopted by the
Board of Commissioners in October 2024 and incorporated into the draft NHC Destination
2050 document, this development pattern is no longer the vision for the Western Bank area.
Staff propose making this district a legacy district, meaning that while existing RFMU zoning
is not impacted (development is still allowed and amendments to the RFMU district can be
proposed), the district could not be applied to additional properties.
Comprehensive Plan Implementation Component – Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) for Planned
Developments
A major focus of the proposed plan is to encourage master planned developments on large
parcels so supportive infrastructure can be provided. This type of review process also allows
the county to better consider the cumulative impacts of development and ensure future
roadway connectivity than piecemeal review of smaller sites over the course of several years.
Currently, the provision for requiring a TIA as part of the application submittal for a Planned
Development (PD) district can disincentivize this land planning tool. A TIA includes an analysis
of the impact a potential development would have on the surrounding roadway network,
based on established engineering practices, and is used by NCDOT to identify the public
improvements the developer must make to their system to offset the project’s impacts. It
must be developed by a professional engineer, who works with NCDOT, the WMPO, and county
staff for several months to scope and analyze the TIA before final approval by NCDOT and the
WMPO.
These types of engineering analyses are required for every application estimated to generate
more than 100 vehicle trips during a peak hour, regardless of whether the application is for a
rezoning request, subdivision, or commercial site plan. This means that the investment must
be made in the analysis before the property owner knows whether they have any legal ability,
or entitlement, to move forward with the project if a rezoning is required.
Because the TIA is created according to engineering practices and must meet NCDOT’s
specifications, public review of the analysis would not change the ultimate findings, and the
long timeline for the review often also means that the TIA is started and nearing completion
before the project is finalized. The final project is shaped by the TIA requirements, in ways
that may not be aligned with Board of Commissioner preferences or public comments, and
discrepancies between the TIA scope and ultimate application can increase confusion.
When the Board of Commissioners first began requiring TIAs for rezonings, the cost to the
developer was determined to be balanced with the Board of Commissioners’ expectations that
they have solid information on the impact of a project before rezoning decisions were made.
For longer term and larger projects, such as PDs, however, more future condition assumptions
must be made during the TIA development process, increasing the likelihood that the TIA will
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 2
TA25-03 Staff Report PB 2.6.2025 Page 3 of 5
need to be revised at later dates and reducing the dependability of information considered
during the rezoning hearing.
To balance the need for quality information on the impacts of a proposed project with a desire
to incentive master planning of large projects and to provide more opportunity for public
input, staff have proposed allowing a transportation network plan rather than a TIA at the
application phase, as long as the requirements for subsequent TIAs are outlined in the
rezoning terms and conditions. The proposed amendment would not remove requirements
for TIAs or developer responsibility for offsite improvements as determined by NCDOT; it
would just change when the full traffic analysis must be developed.
The proposed transportation network plan must still be created by a professional traffic
engineer and will include much of the information required in the first phase of the TIA
process, but the focus would be on both the impacts to the surrounding network and how the
internal network for the project would support the proposed level of development. The
developer and traffic engineer would be anticipated to meet with staff, NCDOT, and the WMPO
as the plan is developed, prior to submittal, to ensure that it incorporates existing plans,
projects, and recommendations. In addition, NCDOT and WMPO staff, who are involved in
the review of all rezoning applications, will also have an opportunity to review the
transportation network plan, and those comments, in addition to public comments, staff
recommendations, Planning Board recommendations, and Board of Commissioner conditions,
can influence the final master planned development, if approved.
Statutory Updates
Two updates to the UDO are proposed in response to state legislation adopted over the past
year.
In December 2024, SL 2024-57 was adopted, which modified the state definition of
“down-zoning” and prohibited local governments from making zoning regulation
changes or zoning map changes that are down-zonings without the permission of
impacted property owners, as referenced previously. The proposed amendment
updates the UDO definition of “down-zoning” to align with the state definition and
revises provisions that previously allowed the county to down-zone property without
the owner’s consent.
In October 2025, a regulatory reform bill, SL 2025-94, was enacted into law. This
legislation prohibits local authorities from imposing time limits on new applications
for requests that are similar to those previously denied. Currently, the UDO requires
that an applicant must wait a year before submitting a new application unless it is
substantially different from a previously denied request. The proposed amendment
removes that language.
Sign Standards Correction
When the UDO document was being updated after the recently adopted sign standards
update, a statement was discovered that would prohibit off-premises advertising signs (such
as billboards) from using electronic changeable copy (digital display) even though the
amendment includes standards for those specific instances. A question from an outdoor
advertising company had been submitted during the public comment period asking if these
types of signs could convert to digital technologies, and the staff report for the amendment
indicated that the intent of the amendment was that the standards for digital signs that apply
to other types of signage also apply to off-premises advertising signs unless otherwise desired
by the Board of Commissioners.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 3
TA25-03 Staff Report PB 2.6.2025 Page 4 of 5
The proposed amendment would remove the conflicting statement, clearly allowing off-
premises advertising signs to use electronic changeable copy as outlined in the standards of
the ordinance.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A draft of the proposed amendment was released on December 8, 2025 following a
presentation to the Planning Board at their December 4, 2025 meeting. Public comments
received during the period between the release and 5 PM on December 29, 2025 were
considered for incorporation into the attached public hearing draft.
One comment was received during that time, which is included as part of the meeting packet.
The comment submitted by Brad Schuler of Paramounte Engineering expresses support for
the concept of modifying TIA requirements for Planned Development districts and identifies
additional sections of Article 10 in the UDO that reference the reapplication restrictions that
conflict with SL 2025-94. Those sections are included in the revised public hearing draft.
In addition to this comment, staff have continued working to vet the transportation network
plan requirements with WMPO staff. In response to their review, staff have revised the
submittal requirements to clarify when subsequent TIAs are necessary and how submitted
information is verified or sourced. WMPO staff also asked for clarification on the review
process for these submittals and the opportunity for public review and comment. As outlined
in the summary of the proposed amendment included in this staff report, the submittal would
be reviewed by both NCDOT and WMPO as part of their regular review of rezoning application
submittals, their comments and feedback would be included in the staff report and inform
staff recommendations, and the information would be available for public review and comment
as part of the rezoning process.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The proposed text amendment is attached, with red italics indicating the new language and
strikethrough indicating provisions that were removed in the public comment draft.
New language included in the public hearing draft in response to public comment and draft
review is shown in bold, blue text, with double strikethrough indicating additional removal
of provisions since the public comment draft was released.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment and suggests the following motion:
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed amendment to the Unified
Development Ordinance to update references to Comprehensive Plan place types,
begin implementation of the NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan update,
incorporate recent changes to state statutes, and correct a conflicting provision in the
sign standards. I find it to be consistent with the purposes and intent of the 2016
Comprehensive Plan and 2026 NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan because it
will support the use of zoning tools that will allow for coordinated land use and
infrastructure planning, limit the use of tools that are not aligned with plan policies,
and maintain consistency with state law. I find RECOMMENDING APPROVAL to be
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 4
TA25-03 Staff Report PB 2.6.2025 Page 5 of 5
reasonable and in the public interest because the proposed amendment will allow for
a common understanding of local authority under state law and begin implementation
of key provisions in the 2026 NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 2 - 5
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Maintenance Amendment –
NHC Destination 2050 Implementation & Updates
Code Sections
Affected
Section 2.3, Definitions
and Terms
Section 3.1.3, Superseding
Dimensional Standards
Section 3.3.5,
Riverfront Mixed Use
(RFMU) Planned
Development District
Section 4.3.2,
Residential Uses
Section 5.2, Traffic, Access, and
Connectivity
Section 5.6,
Signs
Section 10.2.4, Application
Submittal and Acceptance
Section 10.2.10,
Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
Section 10.3.3, Conditional
Zoning
Section 10.3.5,
Special Use Permit
Key Intent
This amendment is a companion to the NHC Destination 2050 Comprehensive Plan
update and includes provisions that update references to Comprehensive Plan place
types as well as discrete updates that will begin the plan implementation process. In
addition, the amendment incorporates recent changes to state statutes and corrects an
unintended provision included in the recent sign standards ordinance amendment.
Changes
Proposed changes to place types in NHC Destination 2050 would impact the application of companion standards in the UDO in ways not allowed under current state law. Draft
provisions remove affected standards that limit density based on place type. Removed
provisions currently apply only to uses that require Board of Commissioner approval. (See
Section 3.1, Superseding Dimensional Standards and Section 4.3.2, Residential
Uses)
The amendment proposes designating the Riverfront Mixed Use (RFMU) zoning district as
a legacy district. This district, applicable only to the County’s western bank, requires a mix of uses that are not supported by the current or proposed plan. Property owners would not
be able to apply for new RFMU zoning designations, but existing RFMU zoning would not
be impacted. (See Section 3.3.5, Riverfront Mixed Use (RFMU) Planned
Development District)
NHC Destination 2050 seeks to encourage master planned developments (MPDs) on large
parcels, but some current provisions could unintentionally discourage these types of
projects. Requirements for the extensive traffic impact analysis (TIA) review process prior
to rezoning application have been identified as a potential barrier and potentially less informative for projects, like large MPDs, that will develop over many years. The draft
amendment proposes allowing a transportation network plan at the rezoning application
phase for Planned Development districts as long as the requirements for subsequent TIA(s)
are outlined in the rezoning terms and conditions. (See Section 5.2, Traffic, Access,
and Connectivity and Transportation Network Plan Submittal Requirements)
The NC General Statutes that authorize local regulation of development continue to evolve
as new state laws are passed. The proposed draft updates provisions related to down-
zonings and the filing of new applications after denials so that the ordinance is consistent with Session Laws 2024-57 and 2025-94. (See Section 2.3, Definitions and Terms;
Section 10.2.4, Application Submittal and Acceptance; Section 10.2.10, Post-
Decision Limitations and Actions, Section 10.3.3, Conditional Zoning, and
Section 10.3.5, Special Use Permit)
After the adoption of UDO text amendment TA25-04 in November, staff identified a
provision that conflicted with other standards and the intent of provisions as described in
the staff report for the amendment. The draft amendment proposes striking the conflicting
statement so it is clear that off-premises outdoor advertising signs can use electronic changeable copy (digital components) but must meet all applicable standards. (See
Section 5.6, Signs)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 3 - 1
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
Article 2: Measurements and Definitions
Section 2.3 Definitions and Terms
Down-Zoning
A text or map amendment that affects an area of land in one of the following ways: (1) By decreasing
the development density of the land to be less dense than was allowed under its previous usage. (2) By
reducing the permitted uses of the land that are specified in this ordinance to fewer uses than were
allowed under its previous usage. (3) By creating any type of nonconformity on land not in a residential
zoning district, including a nonconforming use, nonconforming lot, nonconforming structure,
nonconforming improvement, or nonconforming site element.
Article 3: Zoning Districts
Section 3.1 General
3.1.3. Superseding Dimensional Standards
E. Additional Dwelling Allowances
2. Location and Access
a. Developments allowed an additional dwelling allowance shall be located on a parcel of land
that is either totally or primarily in, contiguous to, or within 250 feet of, the boundary of
areas classified as Employment Center, Urban Mixed Use, or Community Mixed Use place
types in the Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3.3 Mixed Use Zoning Districts
3.3.5. Riverfront Mixed Use (RFMU) Planned Development District
B. Use Standards
As of February 2, 2026, no new RFMU district shall be added to the Official Zoning Map, nor may any
boundary of an existing RFMU district be modified. Any property zoned RFMU prior to February 2, 2026
exists as part of the Official Zoning Map and shall conform to the standards of this ordinance.
Article 4: Uses and Use-Specific Standards
Section 4.3 Standards for Specified Principal Uses
4.3.2. Residential Uses
A. Household Living
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 4 - 1
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
12. Mobile Home Park
Mobile home parks shall comply with the following standards:
a. General Standards
1. Density shall not exceed 2.5 units per acre outside of areas designated as Employment
Center, Urban Mixed Use, or Community Mixed Use in the County’s Comprehensive Plan.
Article 5: General Development Standards
Section 5.2 Traffic, Access, and Connectivity
5.2.4 Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet
A. Unless exempted below, wWhere an application indicates estimated traffic generation of 100 or more
peak hour trips according to the most current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, the application shall be required to provide a Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) in accordance with the standards, practices, and policies of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) and the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
(WMPO).
1. A TIA shall not be required for applications for requests to rezone to a General Planned
Development (PD) district for properties greater than 25 acres in size when the applicant submits
a transportation network plan prepared by a professional traffic engineer that complies with
published administrative requirements, as approved by the New Hanover County Board of
Commissioners, with subsequent amendments approved by the County Manager. In such cases,
the Terms and Conditions component of the rezoning request must include the proposed phasing
and establish when TIAs will be required during the development process.
B. If a TIA is required to be submitted, the applicant or the applicant’s consulting engineer shall follow
all scoping, submittal, review, approval, and appeal procedures promulgated by the NCDOT and
WMPO.
C. Nothing in this section may be construed to exempt an applicant from obtaining other applicable
approvals from the NCDOT, including but not limited to a NCDOT Driveway Permit.
Section 5.6 Signs
C. Additional Sign Regulations
1. Off-Premises Outdoor Advertising Signs
e. Other Standards
2. All off-premises outdoor advertising sign illumination devices shall be in conformance with
all state and local codes regarding illuminations. If the sign is illuminated, the light
source shall be external to the sign itself. Electronic changeable copy shall be prohibited
only be allowed in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.6.2.G: Changeable Copy.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 4 - 2
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
Article 10: Administrative Procedures
10.2.4. Application Submittal and Acceptance
A. Authority to File Applications
2. Application for text amendments and general use zoning map amendments may be submitted by
any person, organization, or interested party, including the Board of Commissioners, the Planning
Board, or County staff except that no text zoning regulation amendment or general use zoning
map amendment that down-zones property, as defined by this ordinance, shall be initiated or
considered without the written consent of all property owners whose property is the subject of
the down-zoning amendment, unless the amendment is initiated by the County and allowed by
state law.
10.2.10. Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
F. Limitation on Subsequent Similar Applications
If an application requiring a public hearing is denied, no application proposing the same or similar
development on all or part of the same land shall be submitted within one year after the date of the
denial unless the Planning Director determines that:
1. There has been a substantial change in the circumstances relevant to the issues or facts
considered during review of the prior application that might reasonably affect the action of the
decision-making body;
2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of review of the prior
application that might reasonably affect the action of the decision-making body;
3. The new application proposed to be submitted is materially different from the prior application;
or
4. The final decision on the prior application was based on material mistake of fact.
10.3.3. Conditional Zoning
C. Conditional Zoning Procedure
7. Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
d. Agreement to Conditions
3. The following do not meet the reapplication requirements of Section 10.2.10.F for
applications denied under this section:
i. The removal of a previously approved condition
ii. A reduction in the scope or requirement of a previously approved condition.
10.3.5. Special Use Permit
C. Special Use Permit Procedure
7. Post-Decision Limitations and Actions
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 4 - 3
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
The post-decision limitations and actions in Section 10.2.10, Post-Decision Limitations and Actions,
apply, except the limitation on subsequent submittal of applications proposing the same or similar
development if the initial application is denied in Section 10.2.10.F, Limitation on Subsequent
Similar Applications, is not limited to one year but applies in perpetuity. Additionally, in addition
to the provisions in subsections a through c below apply.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 4 - 4
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment
Transportation Network Plan Submittal Requirements – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
Transportation Network Plan
As allowed by Section 5.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), applicants for a Planned
Development district rezoning for over 25 acres may submit a Transportation Network Plan in place of a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), subject to the following requirements. Planned Developments approved with
a Transportation Network Plan must still have a TIA reviewed and approved by NCDOT and the WMPO as
part of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) review process when required by the UDO and as
outlined in the approved Terms and Conditions for the Planned Development district.
Submittal Requirements
A graphic plan prepared by a professional traffic engineer showing:
o Proposed access points, driveway and intersection spacing, internal road layout of
collector and connector roads, and proximity to nearby state and federal routes.
o Existing easements.
o Distance to roads, driveways, signals, railways, or crossovers within 500 feet of the
project boundary.
o Proposed right-of-way widths and sight-distance areas.
o Width and functional classification of existing adjacent roads.
o Width, radii, and lane use of existing and proposed roads or driveways.
o Locations of existing and proposed sidewalks, crosswalks, multimodal intersections,
railroads, bus stops, greenways, trails, and similar facilities.
o Roads that are intended to be dedicated for public use and/or maintenance.
o Roads that will include street trees.
o On-street parking areas, internal drives, routing for trucks and service vehicles, traffic
control devices internal to the site, and emergency vehicle access.
The AADT roadway planning capacity, latest traffic volume, and if available, the latest WMPO
point-in-time traffic counts for adjacent public roadways within 500 feet of the project boundary.
The estimated daily and peak AM and PM trips at full buildout and anticipated buildout year.
Estimated trips must be based on the most current ITE Trip Generation Manual.
Expected number of development phases, estimated daily and peak AM and PM trips for each
phase, and anticipated buildout year for each phase (subject to adjustment as subsequent TIAs
are reviewed and approved).
A list of the Any funded or committed transportation improvements listed in the STIP and any
approved but incomplete or undeveloped development projects considered in the
development of the proposed master development plan. All projects within 0.5 miles of
the project boundary should be considered, at a minimum.
Relevant local transportation planning documents A list of the locally and WMPO adopted
transportation plans considered in the development of the proposed master
development plan.
Existing and proposed speed limits and enforcement method on proposed privately owned roads
(±5 mph variation allowed).
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 5 - 1
2026-01 Destination 2050 Implementation Amendment
Transportation Network Plan Submittal Requirements – Planning Board Public Hearing
Draft
Methodology
A Transportation Network Plan should be based on the following methodology:
1. Estimate daily and peak-hour trips for each phase and at full buildout.
2. Model internal trip distribution, external trip distribution, and expected movements on
the adjacent street network, noting data and growth assumptions used and movements
toward each external direction (north, south, east, and west).
3. Identify the most heavily traveled internal corridors; these will serve as the primary collector
roads and must meet collector-level design criteria.
4. Confirm that the number and spacing of collector and connector roads distributes traffic
effectively and avoids overloading any single corridor.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 5 - 2
Public Comments
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 6 - 1
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 4 - 7 - 1
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION
MEETING DATE: 1/8/2026
Other Business
DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor
CONTACT(S): Robert Farrell; Rebekah Roth, Planning and Land Use Director
SUBJECT:
Presenta(on of Amendments to the Planning Board Rules and Procedures
BRIEF SUMMARY:
The Policies and Procedures for Appointments to County Boards, Commissions, Commiees, and Authories establish
the standards and expecta#ons for members appointed by the Board of Commissioners. At its December 15 regular
mee#ng, the Board adopted amendments addressing conflicts of interest, excused and unexcused absences, and the
appointment process. Because these amendments apply to all appointed boards and commi,ees, corresponding
updates to the Planning Board’s rules and procedures are required to ensure consistency.
In addi#on to incorpora#ng the required policy changes, the proposed revisions include clarifica#ons regarding the
handling of #e votes and a prohibi#on on virtual par#cipa#on in Planning Board mee#ngs. Pursuant to Sec#on V of the
Planning Board rules and procedures, proposed amendments must be presented to the Board in wri#ng prior to
adop#on at the following month’s mee#ng. Staff has prepared the necessary revisions for the Board’s review and
requests any ques#ons, comments, or concerns be provided for considera#on before the final dra3 is presented in
February.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS:
No ac#on required. The board should review the dra3 rules and procedures ahead of the February 5 regular mee#ng.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descrip#on
Planning Board Rules and Procedures Update
COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager)
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5
RULES OF PROCEDURE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
The New Hanover County Planning Board, realizing that rules and regulations are necessary for
the orderly and proper discharge of its business and duties, adopts these rules of procedure to
expedite the handling of matters coming before the Board.
1. General Rules
The New Hanover County Planning Board shall be governed in its organization and operation
by the terms of N.C.G.S. §160D and other general and special state laws relating to planning in
New Hanover County, as well as by the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), adopted by the
New Hanover County Board of Commissioners on February 3, 2020 and all amendments
thereto; the New Hanover County Committee Policy: Policy and Procedures for Appointments
to County Boards, Commissions, Committees and Authorities, adopted by the Board of
Commissioners on February 21, 2011 and all revisions thereto; and the Ordinance and
Resolution establishing the New Hanover County Planning Board adopted by the Board of
Commissioners on September 2, 1980. All Board members shall become thoroughly familiar
with the provisions of these Rules of Procedure. Procedures not addressed by these rules, but
required by needs determined by the Board may be conducted according to the rules and
procedures set forth in the most recent edition of “Robert’s Rules of Order”. [05-06-2021]
2. Officers and Duties
A. The Chairperson: A Chairperson shall be elected by the Planning Board from its
members.
i. The term of the Chairperson shall be for one year, beginning as of the first of
August regular board meeting in July, and he / she may be reelected for no
more than two successive terms.
ii. The Chairperson shall decide all matters of order and procedure, subject to
these rules, unless directed otherwise by a majority of the Board in session at
the time.
iii. The Chairperson shall appoint any committees found necessary to investigate
the matter before the Board.
iv. The Chairperson shall perform such other duties as he / she may be directed
by a majority of the Board.
B. The Vice-Chairperson: A Vice-Chairperson shall be elected by the Planning Board
from among its members in the same manner and for the same terms as the
Chairperson.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1
i. The Vice-Chairperson shall preside in the absence of the Chairperson, any
unexpired term of the Chairperson, and assume all duties and responsibilities
delegated by the Chairperson.
ii. The Vice-Chairperson shall perform such other duties as he / she may be
directed by a majority of the Board.
iii. In the event the office of Vice-Chairperson becomes vacant, a Vice-Chairperson
shall be elected to serve the unexpired term.
C. The Secretary: The Planning Director or designee shall serve as Secretary to the
Board. The Secretary, subject to the direction of the Chairperson and the Board, shall
be responsible for keeping all records, shall be responsible for the conduct of all
correspondence of the Board, and shall be responsible for the professional planning
work of the Board. The Secretary shall be responsible for keeping, in a permanent
volume, the minutes of every meeting of the Board. These shall show the record of
all important facts pertaining to each meeting, every resolution acted upon by the
Board, and all votes of members of the Board upon any resolution or upon the final
determination of any questions, indicating the names of members absent or failing
to vote. The Secretary shall not be eligible to vote upon any matter. [05-06-2021]
D. Other Officers: Should the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson both be absent at any
meeting, the Board shall elect a temporary chairperson to serve at the meeting.
Should the Secretary be absent, a temporary Secretary shall be appointed by the
Chair.
3. Meetings
A. Regular Meetings: Regular meetings of the Planning Board shall be held once a
month on the first Thursday of the month in the Assembly Room of the New Hanover
County Historic Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, or as
otherwise stated in the annual meeting calendar adopted by the Board. provided
that uUpon direction of the Chairperson or a majority of the Board, any meeting may
be held at any other place in the County. [05-06-2021]
B. Special Meetings: Special meetings of the Planning Board may be called at any time
by the Chairperson or by a majority of the Board. The Chairperson or Secretary shall
give written notice stating the meeting time, place, and items to be considered to
each board member and the Sunshine List at least forty-eight (48) hours before the
meeting. Notice shall also be posted on the County website and the Planning Board’s
principal bulletin board located at the New Hanover County Government Center. [05-
06-2021]
C. Cancellation of Meetings: Whenever there is no business for the Board, the
Chairperson may dispense with a regular meeting by giving notice to all members of
the Board, not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the time set for the meeting;
provided that the Board shall meet at least once in each sixty (60) day period.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 2
D. Virtual Participation: Board members and the public may not participate virtually
(through Teams, telephone or other electronic communication) in Planning Board
meetings. All participation during a Planning Board meeting must be in-person.
E. Quorum: A quorum shall consist of a majority of the Planning Board members.
F. Vote: The vote of a majority of those members shall be sufficient to decide matters
before the Board, provided a quorum is present.
G. Conduct of Meetings:
i. All meetings shall be open to the public.
ii. The order of business at regular meetings shall be as follows:
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Correction and approval of the minutes of the previous meeting
4. Public hearings and preliminary forums
5. Staff, Board, or citizens’ reports
6. Items by Secretary
7. Items by Chairperson
iii. The Chairperson, at his / her discretion, may impose time limits upon those
desiring to speak.
iv. At the close of discussion on matters heard in public hearing, the Chairperson
may:
1. Call for a formal motion, a second, and a vote by the members for or
against the motion.
2. Call for a vote on the item without calling for a formal motion.
3. Call for a formal motion, a second, and a vote by the members to table
or continue the matter being heard until such time as additional
necessary information may be obtained.
4. A tie vote shall result in no action taken by the board. The board must
continue discussion until there is a majority vote on the matter, or the
item is continued until such time there are sufficient members present
to exclude the possibility of a tie vote.
5. A tie vote to continue an item shall result in no action taken by the
board. In accordance with N.C.G.S. §160D-604, the item shall move
forward to the Board of Commissioners with no recommendation from
the Planning Board.
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 3
v. Public hearings before the Planning Board shall be conducted using the same
procedures as the Board of County Commissioners. [05-06-2021]
4. Responsibility of Planning Board Members
A. Membership of the Planning Board is accepted as a public service.
B. Board members shall, insofar as possible, inspect the site of each rezoning request.
C. When a Board member concludes that he / she has a conflict of interest, as defined in
N.C.G.S. § 160D-109, he / she shall inform the board, refrain from any discussion or
comment on that particular case, and abstain from voting. disclose this during a public
meeting. The disclosure should state the nature of the conflict, including any personal
or financial interest, whether direct or indirect, in the matter under consideration. The
board member must then recuse themselves from voting on the issue. Unless there is
such a conflict of interest, each member must vote on every issue. [05-06-2021]
D. Each Board member shall decide which public or private function he / she can
appropriately attend as a member of the Board. No Board member shall claim to speak
or act on behalf of the Board without first obtaining approval or direction from the Board
authorizing the member to speak or act on its behalf. [05-06-2021]
E. Whenever any Board member shall incur three unexcused absences, said Board
member’s failure to attend shall be reported by the Chairperson to the Chair of the
Board of Commissioners. Such unexcused absences on the part of any Board member
may, at the election of the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners, be deemed to
constitute resignation on the pard of the Board member from the Planning Board.
Excused absences are defined as absences caused by events beyond one’s control and
are subject to approval by the Planning Board. [05-06-2021]
F. An absence is considered excused when it results from circumstances beyond the
appointee’s control, such as illness or medical emergency of the appointee or an
immediate family member, death in the family, employment or military obligations,
inclement weather or hazardous travel conditions, or civic duties required by law
(including jury duty, court subpoena, or voting). An absence is considered unexcused
when the appointee fails to notify the Secretary in advance, when the reason provided
does not meet the criteria for an excused absence, or when no reason is provided.
G. Board members must uphold the County policies pertaining to the duties and
responsibilities of the Planning Board, including but not limited to the most recent
version of the New Hanover County Commissioners’ Committee Policy: Policy and
Procedures for Appointments to County Boards, Commissions, Committees and
Authorities. [05-06-2021]
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 4
V. Amendments
A. These rules of procedure may be amended, within the limits allowed by law, at any time
by an affirmative vote of more than one-half of the Planning Board, provided that such
amendment is presented in writing at a regular or special meeting preceding the
meeting at which the vote is taken.
Adopted by the New Hanover County Planning Board on the 7th day of June, 1981. Amended
September 2, 1999, July 3, 2008, June 2, 2016, May 6, 2021, February 5, 2026
Planning Board - January 8, 2026
ITEM: 5 - 1 - 5