Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.24.26 Agenda PacketFebruary 24, 2026, 5:30 PM I. Call Meeting to Order II. Adoption of December 9, 2025 Minutes (Attendees at December Meeting –Vice Chair Caleb Rash, Will Daube, Jason Holland, Laura King, Michael Sanclimenti, Greg Uhl) II.Old Items of Business IV. Regular Items of Business Case BOA-1001 – Blair Deen, applicant, on behalf of Novant Health, property owner, is requesting a variance from the maximum sign area and maximum height requirements for freestanding signs from Section 5.6.2.B of the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance. This property is zoned O & I, Office and Institutional and is located at 151 Scotts Hill Medical Drive. V. Other Business Introduction of New Members Updated Rules of Procedure VI. Adjourn MEMBERS OF THE BOARD Caleb Rash Chair | Greg Uhl Vice-Chair Will Daube | Laura King |Michael Sanclimenti BOARD ALTERNATES Jason Holland| Kelly Roberts| Jeff Turpin Rebekah Roth, Director of Planning & Land Use | Karen Richards, Deputy County Attorney NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DRIVE, CONFERENCE ROOM 139, WILMINGTON, NC 28403 MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The New Hanover County Board of Adjustment held a regular and duly advertised meeting at 5:30 PM at the New Hanover County Government Center Complex, 230 Government Center Drive, in Conference Room 139, in Wilmington, NC on Tuesday December 9, 2025. Members Present Vice Chair Caleb Rash Will Daube Laura King Jason Holland Michael Sanclimenti Greg Uhl Members Absent Jonathan Bridges Kristin Freeman Ex Officio Members Present Ken Vafier, Planning Operations Supervisor Karen Richards, Deputy County Attorney Lisa Maes, Administrative Supervisor The meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM by Vice Chair Caleb Rash. Vice Chair Rash explained that the Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial Board appointed by the Board of Commissioners to consider ordinance variances from residents in New Hanover County where special conditions would create unnecessary hardships. He said the Board also hears appeals of the County’s interpretation in enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance. The appellants have thirty days before which to appeal any decision made by the Board to Superior Court. Vice Chair Rash asked if there were any corrections to the meeting minutes from the September 23, 2025, meeting. Hearing none, Vice Chair Rash called for a motion to accept the September 23, 2025, meeting minutes as written. Mr. Sanclimenti made the motion to approve of the minutes to which Ms. King seconded. The board unanimously adopted the minutes, 5-0. Vice Chair Rash asked if there were any corrections to the meeting minutes from the October 28, 2025, meeting. Hearing none, Vice Chair Rash called for a motion to accept the October 28, 2025, meeting minutes as written. Mr. Daube made the motion to approve of the minutes to which Ms. King seconded. The board unanimously adopted the minutes, 5-0. Other Business Introduction of New Board Members The Board welcomed new members Jason Holland and Kristin Freeman, making note that Ms. Freeman was unable to attend tonight’s meeting. Adoption of 2026 Meeting Calendar Board members were provided with the proposed 2026 calendar, which aligns with the fourth Tuesday of each month, except November and December. Vice Chari Rash called for a motion to adopt the 2026 Meeting Calendar as proposed. Mr. Sanclimenti made the motion to approve the 2026 Meeting Calendar seconded by Mr. Uhl, The Board unanimously adopted the 2026 Meeting Calendar, 5-0. Election for 2026 Officers Attorney Karen Richards facilitated the election process, asking the Board for a nomination for Chair, to which Mr. Daube nominated Mr. Rash, to which Mr. Uhl seconded this nomination. The Board unanimously voted for Mr. Rash to serve as Chair. Ms. Richards asked the Board for a nomination for Vice Chair, to which Mr. Uhl nominated himself, to which Mr. Daube seconded his nomination. The Board unanimously voted for Mr. Uhl to serve as the Vice Chair. There being no further business before the Board, Vice Chair Rash made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Uhl. The motion to adjourn the meeting passed 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:36 PM. Please note the minutes are not a verbatim recording of the proceeding.   _____________________  Executive Secretary   _____________________  Chair    _____________________  Date  BOA-1001 Page 1 of 6 VARIANCE REQUEST BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT February 24, 2026 CASE: BOA-1001 PETITIONER: Blair Deen, applicant, on behalf of Novant Health, property owner. REQUEST: Variance from the maximum sign area and maximum height requirements for freestanding signs per Section 5.6.2.B of the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). LOCATION: 151 Scotts Hill Medical Drive R02900002-067-000 ZONING: O&I, Office and Institutional District ACREAGE: 26.94 Acres BACKGROUND AND ORDINANCE CONSIDERATIONS: This variance is sought to allow an increase in sign area for two exempt freestanding signs located on the Novant Health Scotts Hill Medical Campus, and an increase in sign height in one of those signs. The general provisions for signs allow for an exemption to obtaining a sign permit for freestanding signs under certain area and height, and the applicant is seeking relief of these dimensional restrictions. The applicant has stated that the signs are necessary to ensure safe and efficient access within the Medical Campus and that the current sign area restrictions do not allow for large and clear enough directional aids. The Medical Campus is permitted to have other directional signs as depicted on the site plan included in their application, and the signs subject to this request fall under an exemption outlined in Section 5.6.2.B. The variance includes a request for a third sign that is located within Pender County. While New Hanover County and Pender County have established an interlocal agreement allowing New Hanover County to administer Pender County’s ordinance on their behalf on portions of the property that fall within its jurisdiction, Pender County standards would govern that sign and it is not able to be considered as part of this request. The UDO defines area and height in relation to signs as: Sign, Surface Area Of The surface area of a sign, which is computed as including the entire area within a regular geometric form or combinations of regular geometric forms comprising all of the display area of the sign and including all of the elements of the matter displayed. Frames and structural members not bearing advertising matter shall not be included in computation of surface area. Sign, Height As applied to a sign, height shall be measured as the vertical distance between the highest part of the sign or its supporting structure, whichever is higher, and a level plane going through the nearest point of the improved public right-of-way at the ground-level curb line. BOA-1001 Page 2 of 6 Figure 1: Aerial Imagery with Staff Markups. The two freestanding subject signs are located adjacent to the roundabout, while the third sign that is in Pender County is also marked in this image. The red polygon is the entire Novant Health Medical Campus, with the yellow polygon depicting the portion of the property that is subject to New Hanover County’s code. Sign 4 Sign 5 Sign 12 located in Pender County, not considered as part of this variance Subject Site BOA-1001 Page 3 of 6 Figure 2: Aerial Imagery with Staff Markups. Based on Table 5.6.2.H of the Unified Development Ordinance’s Permitted and Prohibited Signs by Zoning District, freestanding signs are permitted by right in the Office and Institutional (O&I) district. Section 3.4.6: O&I, Office and Institutional District 3.4.6: The purpose of the Office and Institutional (O&I) District is to provide lands that accommodate institutional, professional office, and other compatible uses. The O&I district should be located in areas with more intense uses and higher density development patterns to support economic clusters in appropriate locations. Sign 5 Sign 4 BOA-1001 Page 4 of 6 Figure 3: Table 5.6.2.H The two signs as designed have an area of 28 square feet (Sign 4) and 6.25 square feet (Sign 5) respectively. This represents a difference in area of 25 square feet (Sign 4) and 3.25 square feet (Sign 5) over what is allowed under Section 5.6.2.B.2.b of the UDO. Sign 4 also exceeds the 30 inch maximum height restriction, measuring 7 feet tall as designed, which represents a difference in height of 4.5 feet. Section 5.6.2: General Provisions 5.6.2.B.2 Exemptions: A sign permit is not required before the posting or installation of one of the following signs. However, all signs shall comply with all other requirements of this section. 5.6.2.B.2.b: On each lot, up to four freestanding signs, each with a maximum three square feet in sign area and 30 inches in sign height. BOA-1001 Page 5 of 6 Figure 4: Zoning Map with Staff Markups. Per the applicant, a variance is necessary to ensure safe and efficient access within the Novant Health Scotts Hill Medical Campus, which includes several buildings tailored to specific needs. The applicant also contends that the signage and access identification is a necessity to allow the citizens seeking medical assistance to reach their intended destination within the medical campus as soon as possible. In summary, the applicant is requesting a variance from the sign area restriction to allow for larger sized directional signs to assist citizens to reach their destination within the campus as efficiently as possible. The area of the two signs is 28 square feet and 6.25 square feet, and the heights are 7 feet and 30 inches. Sign 5 Sign 4 BOA-1001 Page 6 of 6 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT POWER AND DUTY: The Board of Adjustment has the authority to authorize variances from the terms of the Unified Development Ordinance where, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in unnecessary hardship. In granting any variance, the Board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the Unified Development Ordinance. A concurring vote of four-fifths (4/5) of the voting members of the Board shall be necessary to grant a variance. A variance shall not be granted by the Board unless and until the following findings are made: 1. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property. 2. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size, or topography. Hardships resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or the general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance. 3. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship. 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. ACTION NEEDED (Choose one): 1. Motion to approve the variance request based on the findings of fact (with or without conditions) 2. Motion to table the item in order to receive additional information or documentation (Specify). 3. Motion to deny the variance request based on specific negative findings in any of the 4 categories above. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD Caleb Rash Chair | Greg Uhl Vice-Chair Will Daube | Laura King | Michael Sanclimenti BOARD ALTERNATES Jason Holland | Kelly Roberts | Jeff Turpin Rebekah Roth, Director of Planning & Land Use | Karen Richards, Deputy County Attorney NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 230 GOVERNMENT CENTER DRIVE, CONFERENCE ROOM 139 WILMINGTON NC 28403 ORDER TO GRANT A VARIANCE – Case BOA-1001 The Board of Adjustment for New Hanover County, having held a public hearing on February 24, 2026, to consider application number BOA-1001, submitted by Blair Deen, applicant, on behalf of Novant Health, property owner, is requesting a variance from the maximum sign area and maximum height requirements for freestanding signs, and from the height restriction for one of the signs, from Section 5.6.2.B of the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). This property is zoned O&I, Office and Institutional, and is located at 151 Scotts Hill Medical Drive, and having heard all the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing, makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT and draws the following CONCLUSIONS: • It is the Board’s conclusion that, if the applicant complies with the literal terms of the ordinance, specifically the 3 square foot maximum area requirement and the 30 inch height requirement per Section 5.6.2.B.2.b of the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance, that an unnecessary hardship would result. (It shall be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property.) This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. 2. It is the Board’s conclusion that the hardship of which the applicant complains results from unique circumstances related to the subject property, such as location, size, or topography. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. 3. It is the Board’s conclusion that the hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. 4. It is the Board’s conclusion that, if granted, the variance will be consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT: • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. • _______________________________________________________________________. THEREFORE, on the basis of all the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the application for a VARIANCE from the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance to allow a variance from the 3 square foot maximum area requirement and the 30 inch maximum height requirement per Section 5.6.2.B of the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance be GRANTED/DENIED. Approval is subject to applicant within 7 days signing a document acknowledging applicant’s consent to all of the following conditions, if any. If the applicant does not sign a document acknowledging consent to all listed conditions, then this approval is null and void. ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2026 ____________________________________ Chair Attest: ________________________________ Kenneth Vafier, Executive Secretary to the Board Page 1 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com VARIANCE Application REVIEW PROCESS Step 1: Pre-Application Conference In order to assist applicants through the variance process, applicants are highly encouraged to attend a pre- application conference prior to application submittal. Applicants are requested to review Section 122-1(2) of the Zoning Ordinance and sections relating to the application, and advised to contact Planning Staff with any questions. The purpose of the pre-application conference is to provide the applicant an opportunity to become familiar with the submittal requirements and procedures of the application, and also to receive preliminary comments from staff regarding the proposal’s compliance with any applicable development regulations. Step 2: Application Submittal Applications must be received by the Planning and Inspections Department by 5:00 PM on the application deadline date. A complete application consists of the items detailed in the submittal checklist provided in this application. Step 3: Staff Review Upon receiving a completed application, staff may distribute it to certain departments and agencies for review. County Planning staff shall review the application, and prepare a staff report for the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Step 4: Zoning Board of Adjustment Review and Action The New Hanover County Zoning Board of Adjustment shall consider the application at a public hearing. Public hearings for variance applications are conducted in a quasi-judicial manner and include additional standards for the testimony and evidence presented during the hearing. The property owner, or their attorney, must be present for the meeting. A variance shall be approved if the applicant provides substantial evidence that the proposed use will meet the following findings: 1. Unnecessary hardship would result from the strict application of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property. 2. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size or topography. Hardship resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance. 3. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship. Page 2 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. No change in permitted uses may be authorized by a variance. The Zoning Board of Adjustment may impose appropriate conditions on a variance, provided that the conditions are reasonably related to the variance. A concurring vote of a majority of members of the Board is necessary to grant a variance. The Planning and Inspections Department shall notify the public of the hearing in accordance with standards of the Zoning Ordinance. This includes sending mailed notice to nearby residents, posting a sign on the subject property, and advertising the hearing in a local newspaper. Page 3 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com VARIANCE Application Applicant/Agent Information Property Owner(s) If different than Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name Company Owner Name 2 Address Address City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Phone Phone Email Email Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Application Tracking Information (Staff Only) Case Number Date/Time received: Received by: O&I (CHR1) 26.94 R02900-002-067-000 151 Scotts Hill Medical Drive, Wilmington, NC 28411 Winston Salem, NC, 27103 2085 Frontis Plaza Boulevard Novant Health Blair.Deen@novanthealth.org 919-818-7511 Wilmington, NC, 28412 2605 Iron Gate Drive Novant Health Blair Deen Page 4 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 PROPOSED VARIANCE NARRATIVE Subject Zoning Regulation, Chapter and Section: ____________________________________________________ In the below space, please provide a narrative of the application. (Additional pages may be attached to the application if necessary) _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE The Zoning Board of Adjustment may grant a variance if it finds that strict application of the ordinance results in an unnecessary hardship for the applicant, and if the variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed use meets these required findings (please use additional pages if necessary). 1. Unnecessary hardship would result from strict application of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property. ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Strict application of the sign ordinance would create an unnecessary hardship by limiting the hospital’s ability to provide clear and effective wayfinding to essential services, particularly the Emergency Department. While the property would remain in use, insufficient directional signage would increase confusion for first-time visitors and patients arriving under emergency conditions, potentially delaying care. This hardship is operational and safety-related, not economic, and directly affects the hospital’s ability to function as a community healthcare provider. The requested variance to the sign ordinance is necessary to ensure safe and efficient access within the Novant Health Scotts Hill Medical Campus, which includes an existing Medical Office Building (2025), Outpatient Surgical Center (2007), and Emergency Department (2015, expanding in 2026), as well as a new community hospital planned to open in 2026. The campus is designed to serve a rapidly growing population in both New Hanover and Pender Counties and is located immediately adjacent to U.S. Highway 17, a heavily traveled corridor with frequent congestion and complex traffic movements. As part of the City’s ongoing review process, the applicant has worked collaboratively with staff to modify multiple proposed signs so that they fully comply with the existing sign ordinance. Following these revisions, only three directional signs remain subject to this variance request. These signs are limited in number and scope, and the applicant believes they are essential to safely direct patients, visitors, and emergency responders to critical hospital services. Due to the size and multi-building layout of the campus, its proximity to water (only allowing major traffic to enter from U.S. Highway 17), and its location across two county jurisdictions, standard sign ordinance limitations do not adequately support safe wayfinding for patients, visitors, and emergency responders. The proposed signage is strictly directional in nature and is intended to guide the public to critical healthcare services, reduce confusion during urgent situations, and prevent vehicles from mistakenly entering nearby residential or commercial properties. Granting the variance supports public safety, improves emergency response efficiency, and aligns with the ordinance’s intent to protect the general welfare of the community. Page 5 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 2. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size or topography. Hardship resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that are common to the neighborhood or general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance. ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ 3. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship. ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. ____________________________________________________The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the sign ordinance in that it prioritizes public safety and achieves substantial justice. As New Hanover and Pender Counties continue to experience rapid population growth, the expansion of emergency services and the addition of up to 80 new inpatient beds will serve an increasing number of residents and visitors. Clear, visible, and well-placed directional signage is essential to ensure timely access to care, reduce emergency response times, and maintain safe traffic circulation both on campus and in surrounding areas. Granting the variance enables the hospital to meet critical healthcare needs while remaining aligned with the ordinance’s overarching goal of protecting public health, safety, and welfare. The hardship is not the result of actions taken by the applicant or property owner. The need for additional directional signage stems from inherent conditions of the site, including its location, scale, traffic environment, and campus configuration. Although the property was acquired with knowledge of these conditions, the operational and safety challenges associated with providing clear access to emergency and hospital services are not self-created and exist independently of the applicant’s actions. The hardship arises from physical and locational conditions unique to the property at 151 Scotts Hill Loop Road. The campus is immediately adjacent to U.S. Highway 17, where congestion, peak-hour traffic, and multiple approaches require enhanced visibility and advance directional guidance from multiple roadways. The property also spans both New Hanover and Pender Counties and functions as a large, integrated medical campus with multiple facilities and entrances. Overall Signage Plan for Site: Requested Variance for Sign 4, 5, & 12 Variance Detail Sign 4: · The sign is allowed. The property is zoned O&I with over 200 feet of street frontage, which allows one freestanding sign and two auxiliary signs. · Allowable sizing: Up to 20 feet tall and up to 12 square feet in sign/text area. · The sign meets the height requirement, but not the square footage (allowable shown as dashed line) Novant Health has made e orts to comply with the sign requirements by reducing the sign height to meet ordinance standards. However, the 12-square-foot text limitation on overall sign area does not allow for the inclusion of all campus destinations. As a primary sign, the first point of directional information encountered on an institutional campus, this signage is intended to provide comprehensive wayfinding, which cannot be e ectively achieved within the current size constraints. Novant Health requests a variance for the additional square feet of text on Side A of freestanding sign 4. Variance Detail Sign 5: · The sign is allowed as part of Section 5.6.2.B.2.b, which allows up to four additional freestanding signs (only using 2 of 4allowed). · Allowable sizing: a maximum of 3 square feet in sign/text area and 30 inch in height · The sign meets the height requirement, but not the square footage (allowable shown as dashed line) Novant Health has made e orts to comply with the sign requirements by reducing its height to meet ordinance standards. However, the limitation of 3 square feet for overall signage does not allow for more than a single-line destination reference. As a result, the sign cannot provide comprehensive directional information to guide visitors e ectively when exiting the Medical Center parking lot. Novant Health requests a variance for the additional square feet of text on Side A of directional sign 5. Variance Detail Sign 12: · The sign is allowed as part of Section 5.6.2.B.2.b, which to four additional freestanding signs (only using 2 of 4allowed). · Allowable sizing: a maximum of 3 square feet in sign/text area and 30 inch in height · The sign meets the height requirement, but not the square footage(allowable shown as dashed line) Novant Health has made e orts to comply with the sign requirements by reducing its height to meet ordinance standards. However, the limitation of 3 square feet for overall signage does not allow for more than a single-line destination reference. As a result, the sign cannot provide comprehensive directional information to guide visitors e ectively when exiting the Medical Center parking lot. Novant Health requests a variance for the additional square feet of text on Side A & B of directional sign 12. Page 6 of 6 Variance Application – Updated 3/2017 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under “Applicant Initial”. Staff will not process an application for further review until it is determined to be complete. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURES By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the variance application for which I am applying. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this application meets the require findings necessary for granting a variance. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1.Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2.Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3.Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. __________________________________________ _______________________________________ Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s) __________________________________________ Blair Deen Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name(s) NOTE: Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. *The land owner or their attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. Required Information Applicant Initial Staff Initial 1 Complete Variance application 2 Application fee – $400 3 Site plan or sketch illustrating requested variance 4 1 hard copy of ALL documents For Staff Only Application Comments ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ BND BND BND Matt Stiene