HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ26-02 PB ScriptPLANNING BOARD SCRIPT
for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z26-02)
Request by Angela Roseman with SMI Development Services, applicant, on behalf of Ohnmacht
Properties, LLC, property owner, to rezone approximately 0.58 acres located at 7037 Market Street
from R-15, Residential to B-2, Regional Business.
1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and
any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional
5 minutes for rebuttal.
2. Conduct Hearing, as follows:
a. Staff presentation
b. Applicant’s and supporters’ presentation (up to 15 minutes)
c. Opponent’s presentation (up to 15 minutes)
d. Applicant’s and supporters’ rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
e. Opponent’s rebuttal (up to 5 minutes)
f. Staff review of any additional conditions
3. Board discussion
4. Close the public hearing
5. Before we proceed with a motion and vote, I would like to invite the applicant to
the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public
hearing, would you like withdraw your petition, request a continuance, or proceed
with a vote?
6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change
is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning
request is reasonable and in the public interest.
Example Motion for Approval
I move to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because
the B-2 zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Urban Mixed Use
place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents. I also find
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because the proposed district could provide services to nearby residences.
Alternative Motion for Denial
I move to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be
CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because
the B-2 zoning district would provide uses that are in line with the Urban Mixed Use
place type that could serve existing and future businesses and residents, I find
RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public
interest because potential impacts to the adjacent residential uses cannot be mitigated
with a straight rezoning.
Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial:
I move to RECOMMEND [Approval/Denial] of the proposed rezoning to a B-2 district. I
find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the 2016
Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I also find RECOMMENDING [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable
and in the public interest because [insert reasons]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________