Loading...
6505 CBch Rd Variance AppPage 1 of 5 Variance Application – Updated 05-2021 NEW HANOVER COUNTY_____________________ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com ZONING & SUBDIVISION VARIANCE APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a request for a zoning and/or subdivision variance. The application submitted through the county’s online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications for a variance are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.11 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Public Hearing Procedures (Optional) Pre-Application Conference (Optional) Community Information Meeting 1 Application Submittal & Acceptance 2 Planning Director Review & Staff Report 3 Public Hearing Scheduling & Notification : Advisory Body Review & Action 4 Board of Adjustment Hearing & Decision 5 Post-Decision Limitations and Actions 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) Company Company/Owner Name 2 Address Address City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Phone Phone Email Email cwolf@lobodemar.biz Cindee Wolf Design Solutions P.O. Box 7221 Wilmington, NC 28406 910-620-2374 Ernest F. Faison, II 6505 Carolina Beach Road Wilmington, NC 28412 pokermike59@gmail.com 910-232-0303 (Contact: Mike Pederson) (Contract Purchaser) Page 2 of 5 Variance Application – Updated 05-2021 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) 3. Proposed Variance Narrative Subject Zoning Regulation, Chapter and Section In the space below, please provide a narrative of the application (attach additional pages if necessary). 6505 Carolina Beach Road 313206.39.4885 / R08200-002-001-000 0.92 ac. R-15 (Proposed (CZD) B-2 Variance request from Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Article 3.1.3.C.1. - Interior Side and Rear Setbacks fro Residential Properties. The prescribed setback is thirty feet (30'), but the existing structure is located only fifteen and nine tenths feet (15.9') from the side boundary line. A variance for a fifteen-foot (15') reduction of the side setback is requested to allow for adaptive re-use of the existing structure. Page 3 of 5 Variance Application – Updated 05-2021 CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE The Board of Adjustment may grant a variance if it finds that strict application of the ordinance results in an unnecessary hardship for the applicant, and if the variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose, and intent of the ordinance. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed use meets these required findings (attach additional pages if necessary). 1. Unnecessary hardship would result from strict application of the ordinance. It shall not be necessary to demonstrate that, in the absence of the variance, no reasonable use can be made of the property. 2. The hardship results from conditions that are peculiar to the property, such as location, size or topography. Hardship resulting from personal circumstances, as well as hardships resulting from conditions that area common to the neighborhood or general public, may not be the basis for granting a variance. A hardship would result from strict application of the prescribed setback because it would require demolition of the existing structure, and new construction to meet the larger setback. The hardship results from the desire for adaptive re-use of an existing structure. The property is currently zoned for residential use, and the structure is conforming to that zoning district's setback. However, the proposed rezoning to use the structure for commercial use would create a non-conforming situation. Page 4 of 5 Variance Application – Updated 05-2021 3. The hardship did not result from actions taken by the applicant or the property owner. The act of purchasing property with knowledge that circumstances exist that may justify the granting of a variance shall not be regarded as a self-created hardship. 4. The requested variance is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the ordinance, such that public safety is secured, and substantial justice is achieved. Again, the hardship to the property owner would be the necessity to remove a perfectly good structure, rather than adapting it for a different use. Approval of the requested variance would allow the adaptive re-use of an existing structure. The existing side property setback meets all building code regulations, and that yard will include a vegetated buffer for the visual screening and physical separation from the adjacent residential use. Allowing some latitude to this specific requirement, on this particular parcel, would not adversely affect the spirit, purpose or intent of the Ordinance, nor pose a public safety issue. Approval of a variance for a reduced setback would provide substantial justice for the property owner to pursue reasonable use of the existing structure.