Loading...
Agenda 2023 08-07NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175, Wilmington, NIC 28403 P. (910) 798-7149 1 F: (910) 798-7145 1 NHCgov.com Bill Rivenbark, Chair I LeAnn Pierce, Vice -Chair Jonathan Barfield, Jr., Commissioner I Dane Scalise, Commissioner I Rob Zapple, Commissioner AUGUST 7, 2023 4:00 PM LOCATION (NHC Historic Courthouse, 24 North 3rd Street, Room 301) MEETI NG CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Bill Rivenbark) I NVOCATI ON (Pastor Edwrin Sutton, The Sending Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Chair Bill Rivenbark) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS Approval of Minutes Adoption of Budget Amendments Approval of a request by the City of Wilmington to waive landfill tipping fees for the nCino Sports Complex project. 4. Adoption of a Resolution of Support for the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's (WMPO's) Resilience Improvement Planning Grant Application through the United States Department of Transportation's Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost -saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program ESTI MATED MINUTES REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 5 5. Consideration of the 2023 National Immunization Awareness Month 5 6. Appointment of Voting Delegate to the 2023 North Carolina Association of County Commissioners (NCACC) Annual Conference 20 7. Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Development Agreement to decrease the guaranteed maximum price for the Redevelopment of the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, and North Third Street; and Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Negotiation of an Installment Financing Contract Not to Exceed $57 Million, Directing the Publication of Notice with Respect Thereto, and Providing for Certain Other Related Matters 5 8. New Hanover County Plan for Transportation Agreement of NHC Involuntary Commitments (I VC) Respondents as required by NCGS 122C-251 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 45 9. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z23-12) — Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Patricia Roseman with Blue Tank, LLC and Holly Tank, LLC, property owners, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned 1-1, Light Industrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned 1-1 and R-15, Residential located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMF-L, Residential Multi -Family — Low Density for a maximum of 521 residential units consisting of multi -family, attached, and detached residential dwelling units. (See page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map) 45 10. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, Residential to (CZD) R-5, Residential for a maximum of 7 single-family residential lots. (See page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map.) 45 11. QUASI -JUDICIAL HEARING Special Use Permit Request (S23-03) - Request by Chris Baker, applicant, on behalf of the Sanctuary Church of Wilmington, property owner, for the use of Child Care Center at the approximately 7.47-acre parcel located at 6687 Carolina Beach Road, zoned R-15, Residential. (see page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map). Note: This item was continued during the July 17, 2023 meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes) ESTI MATED MINUTES ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 12. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney 13. ADJOURN Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Mission New Hanover County is committed to providing equitable opportunities and exceptional public services through good governance to ensure a safe, healthy, secure and thriving community for all. Vision A vibrant, prosperous, diverse coastal community committed to building a sustainable future for future generations. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Consent DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY: Approve minutes from the following meetings: Agenda Review held on July 13, 2023 Regular Meeting held on July 17, 2023 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Good Governance o Effective County Management ■ I ncrease transparency and awareness about county actions RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approve minutes COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Consent DEPARTMENT: Budget PRESENTER(S): Eric Credle, Chief Financial Officer CONTACT(S): Eric Credle and Michelle Daniels, Budget Officer SU BJ ECT: Adoption of Budget Amendments BRIEF SUMMARY: The following budget amendments amend the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024: 24-001 911 Communications - The county has an Emergency Telephone System (ETS) Fund that is funded by 911 surcharges that are collected by telephone carriers and remitted to the state. The state then funds the county's ETS Fund based on the number of users, which is to be used for purchases of 911 related equipment. A routine review by the state determined that $16,501 in purchases charged by the county to the ETS Fund were ineligible purchases. Those purchases related to an uninterrupted power supply at the back-up center that supports the 911 system and certain information -technology costs related to the county's computer -aided dispatch system, both of which staff believes were the result of isolated circumstances and unlikely to recur. Accordingly, a budget amendment is needed to reimburse the ETS Fund for those expenditures by the General Fund. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Good Governance o Strong Financial Performance ■ Proactively manage the county budget RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the ordinances for the budget amendments listed. ATTACHMENTS: 24-001 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend adoption. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 2 AGENDA: August 7, 2023 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024 BUDGET BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the following Budget Amendment(s) be made to the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. Section 1: Details of Budget Amendment Strategic Focus Area: Good Governance Strategic Okieetive(s): Align services and programs with stratcgic priorities. Fund: General Department: Non -Departmental Expenditure: Decrease increase 11 Total BA 24-001 Transfer to Special Revenue Fund $ 16,501 $ 16,501 Total $ - $ 16,501 16,501 Revenue: Decrease I Increase 11 Total BA 24-001 Appropriated Fund Balance 1$ 16,501 $ 16,501 Total $ - I I $ 16,501 Prior to Actions Total if Actions Taken Today General Fund Budget $ 40021912665 $ 400,208,166 Appropriated Fund Balance 1 $ 16,826,868 $ 16,843,369 Fund: Emergency Telephone System Fund Department: 911 Communications Expenditure: Decrease Increase 11 Total BA 24-001 Admin Reserve $ 16,50111$ 16,501 Total $ - $ 16,5011 $ 16,501 Revenue: I Decrease I Increase 11 Total BA 24-001 Transfer from General Fund I $ 16,501 $ 16,501 Total $ - 1 $ 16,5011 $ 16,501 Prior to Actions Total if Actions Taken Toda Department Budget $ 824,192 $ 840,693 Section 2: Explanation BA 24-001 transfers funds from the General Fund to the Emergency Telephone System Fund (ETS Fund) to reimburse the ETS Fund for purchases made that were determined to be ineligible to be purchased by that specialized fund and instead should have been made by the General Fund. Section 3: Documentation of Adoption This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of New Hanover County, North Carolina, that the Ordinance for Budget Amendment(s) 24-001 amending the annual budget ordinance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, is adopted. Adopted, this 7th day of August, 2023. (SEAL) William E. Rivenbark, Chairman ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Consent DEPARTMENT: Environmental Management PRESENTER(S): Joe Suleyman, Environmental Management Director CONTACT(S): Joe Suleyman SU BJ ECT: Approval of a request by the City of Wilmington to waive landfill tipping fees for the nCino Sports Complex project. BRIEF SUMMARY: The City of Wilmington is requesting the waiver of landfill tipping fees of up to 7,000 cubic yards (approximately 5,000 - 7,000 tons) for the nCino Sports Complex. A previous request waived the fees for over 2,000 tons of material and county staff recommends a cap of 5,000 tons be imposed. The total value of the current request is estimated at $350,000; project funds saved will be utilized to offset the cost of additional amenities at the complex. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Intelligent Growth & Economic Development o Encourage development of complete communities in the unincorporated county ■ Increase connectivity of residents to each other and their investment to New Hanover County o Leverage public infrastructure to encourage private investment ■ I nvest in I nfrastructure to support business growth RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Recommend approval of the request, with a cap of 5,000 tons. ATTACHMENTS: Tip fee waker application COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with staff condition that 5,000 tons cap be imposed. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 3 APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF TIPPING FEES This form should be completed and submitted to the Director of Environmental Management for consideration of a waiver of established tipping fees. The Director will review the application and make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Submit the completed form to: Joe Suleyman Director, Environmental Management 3002 US Highway 421 North Wilmington, NC 28401 SECTION ONE (To be completed by Applicant) Name of Organization: City of Wilmington Address: .212 Operations Center Drive P.O. Box 1810 Wilmington, NC 28402 _ Primary Contact Phone: Email Address: _Matt Hart, Sr. Project Manager _(_910_)_765-0706 —matt.hart@wilmingtonnc.gov 1.) What is the mission of your organization? To serve the citizens of the City of Wilmington. 2.) What type of service(s) do/does your organization provide to the residents of New Hanover County? The City provides the full range of services authorized by statute. This includes police, fire, sanitation, streets, public improvements, planning and zoning and general administrative services. The City also operates parking facilities, a golf course, and provides solid waste and storm water management services. In addition, the Cape Fear Public Transportation Authority, a component unit, provides bus transit services within the City. 3.) Outline the necessity of this request and its impact on your organization: Disposal of the approved waste generated by the construction of the nCino Sports Complex in New Hanover County on Sutton Steam Plant Rd., under a fee waiver will provide a direct benefit to the City of Wilmington and New Hanover Co. citzens as the funds saved could be used for other amentiies for the park. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 4.) Have tipping fees been waived in the past for this organization (circle one)? YES NO 5.) Please attach a copy of any documentation of your organization's IRS status N/A 6.) What waste removal/hauling company will be transporting your waste? TALovin Inc.- General Contractor 7.) What is the estimated amount (in tons or cubic yards) of expected waste generation? Tons OR 7000 Cubic Yards 8.) Check type(s) of waste: _Garbage or refuse X Construction waste _Bulky waste (mattresses, furniture, etc.) I hereby certify that the information above is true and accurate, and that I am authorized by my organization to submit this request on its behalf. I also understand that it is my organization's responsibility to ensure that no hazardous or prohibited wastes will be disposed of. Signature: _ Matt tyl lkt SECTION TWO (To be completed by NHC DEM) Date: 5/1 /2023 I reviewed t `, tipping fee waiver request and COMMEND IDO NOT RECOMMEND approval (circle one). Signature: JA- Date: 7/Z9/Z6Z3 Cc: NHC Landfill Mgr. Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Consent DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director CONTACT(S): Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SU BJ ECT: Adoption of a Resolution of Support for the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's (WMPO's) Resilience Improvement Planning Grant Application through the United States Department of Transportation's Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost -saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program BRIEF SUMMARY: The 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the new PROTECT discretionary program with $1.4 billion in appropriated funds over five (5) years, with an estimated $848 million in program funding for the current funding cycle. The PROTECT program's vision is to "fund projects that address the climate crisis by improving the resilience of the surface transportation system, including highways, public transportation, ports, and intercity passenger rail." In June, the WMPO Board directed WMPO staff to prepare an application for the ongoing Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023 PROTECT Notice of Funding Opportunity for a planning grant to develop a resilience Improvement plan for the WMPO planning area. The planned activities for the development of a resilience improvement plan for the WMPO planning area will include the identification of natural hazard related vulnerabilities in the surface transportation network within our region through various scenario modeling, review of realistic infrastructure improvement projects, programs, and policies, and a list of prioritized short- and long-term infrastructure improvements to address these identified vulnerabilities and improve system resilience. All these activities will include significant stakeholder and public input. Projects identified within a resilience improvement plan then become eligible for resilience improvement grant funding through the PROTECT discretionary grant program, and other local, state, and federal funding can be sought for their implementation. The Cape Fear region holds strategic importance for the state's economy and the defense of the United States, both reliant upon accessibility via the surface transportation network to the Port of Wilmington. Wilmington and its neighboring towns and counties, attract thousands of visitors annually for purposes spanning from tourism to education to business. In addition, the Wilmington region's population continues to rapidly grow, as does the number of jobs and businesses relocating to the area. Natural hazard related vulnerabilities in the surface transportation network within our region have the potential to impact the region's critical transportation infrastructure and cause disruptions well outside our planning area. The identification of these vulnerabilities and a plan for addressing them through project and policy implementation would ultimately provide benefits extending well beyond southeastern North Carolina. As the regional transportation planning agency for the lower Cape Fear region of southeastern North Carolina metropolitan area, the WMPO is highly qualified to lead the development of a resilience improvement plan as they operate on a regional scale to provide multimodal transportation network planning and technical service support to their member jurisdictions and planning partners. The WMPO also works to identify projects and funding sources to grow and improve the transportation network within their planning area while facilitating regional collaboration in the best interest of the public. Public safety and equity are critical components of the work the WMPO undertakes and Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 4 both topics are at the forefront of their planning initiatives. Furthermore, the WMPO has a history of involvement in regional resilience initiatives through collaboration on university studies, staff publications, and inclusion of resiliency topics in past metropolitan transportation plans. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Good Governance o Effective County Management Continuous focus on the customer experience Deliver quality service at the right time RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Support for WMPO's Application for PROTECT Program Funding COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend adoption. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE WILMINGTON URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION'S RESILIENCE IMPROVEMENT PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION THROUGH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S PROMOTING RESILIENT OPERATIONS FOR TRANSFORMATIVE, EFFICIENT, AND COST -SAVING TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the United States Department of Transportation has developed a discretionary grant program to address surface transportation resilience to natural hazards through the new Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost -Saving Transportation (PROTECT) Program; and WHEREAS, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill has appropriated $848 million for the PROTECT Program through Fiscal Year 2026; and WHEREAS, the program supports the development of a resilience improvement plan that addresses immediate and long range transportation network needs related to comprehensive natural hazard preparedness to limit transportation disruptions, and to identify and assess areas of vulnerability within the transportation network to be considered and prioritized for future resiliency projects; and WHEREAS, the PROTECT Program encourages that entities, including local governments, that are interested in obtaining implementation funds through the PROTECT Program have an adopted Resilience Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization planning area has observed transportation network disruptions due to natural hazard events such as flooding and has a high likelihood of future flooding and severe weather events such as hurricanes; and WHEREAS, a resilience improvement plan that covers the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization would include New Hanover County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that New Hanover County supports the application from the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization to develop a resilience improvement plan for the greater Wilmington region through the PROTECT Program. ADOPTED this 71h day of August 2023. NEW HANOVER COUNTY William E. Rivenbark, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Health and Human Services PRESENTER(S): Jonathan Campbell, Public Health Director CONTACT(S): Jonathan Campbell SUBJECT: Consideration of the 2023 National Immunization Awareness Month BRIEF SUMMARY: National Immunization Awareness Month observed every August, highlights the importance of vaccinating people of all ages against numerous preventable diseases. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Superior Public Health & Safety o Sustain the community capacity to prepare for and respond to public safety demands ■ Reduce or prevent community risks RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the proclamation. ATTACHMENTS: National Immunization Awareness Month Proclamation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend adoption. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 5 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, vaccine -preventable illnesses still pose a health risk to people of all ages, it is more important than ever to ensure all in the community are protected from vaccine -preventable diseases; and WHEREAS, National Immunization Awareness Month highlights the importance of fighting against infectious diseases using vaccines, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared one of the top ten public health accomplishments of the 20' century; and WHEREAS, the continued immunization efforts of parents, families, health care providers, public health systems, institutions, and others has significantly reduced the threat of many infectious diseases; and WHEREAS, people need to receive immunizations throughout their lives for healthy individuals and communities; and WHEREAS, pregnant women in particular need to make sure they receive all the necessary vaccines to protect their own health as well as the health of their infants, because vaccination can protect babies up to six months after birth while they are too young to receive vaccines themselves; and WHEREAS, vaccines are demonstrated to be a safe method of preventing disease, as they are thoroughly tested before licensing and carefully monitored to ensure safety; and WHEREAS, vaccines are a highly cost-effective way to prevent disease, as they are protecting not only individuals but entire communities by reducing and preventing the spread of infectious diseases. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners that August 2023 will be recognized as National Immunization Awareness Month in New Hanover County. ADOPTED this the 7th day of August, 2023. NEW HANOVER COUNTY William E. Rivenbark, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Chair Bill Rivenbark CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board SU BJ ECT: Appointment of Voting Delegate to the 2023 North Carolina Association of County Commissioners (NCACC) Annual Conference BRIEF SUMMARY: The NCACC 116th Annual Conference will be held in Wake County on August 24-26, 2023. The annual business session will be held in on Saturday, August 26, at 2 p.m. Each county will be entitled to one vote on items that come before the membership, including the election of the NCACC Second Vice President. The NCACC is asking that each county designate one voting delegate (and also may assign one alternate voting delegate) by August 21, 2023. Chair Bill Rivenbark, Commissioner Jonathan Barfield, and Commissioner Rob Zapple are attending. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Good Governance o Effective County Management ■ Increase transparency and awareness about county actions RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Appoint a voting delegate for the 116th Annual NCACC Conference. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approve selected voting delegate. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Facilities PRESENTER(S): Sara Warmuth, Chief Facilities Officer; Eric Credle, Chief Management Finance Officer CONTACT(S): Sara Warmuth, Eric Credle; Kate Baillon, Interim Museum Director; Dana Conners, Library Director SU BJ ECT: Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Development Agreement to decrease the guaranteed maximum price for the Redevelopment of the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, and North Third Street; and Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Negotiation of an Installment Financing Contract Not to Exceed $57 Million, Directing the Publication of Notice with Respect Thereto, and Providing for Certain Other Related Matters BRIEF SUMMARY: At the May 15, 2023 Board of Commissioners meeting, a public hearing was conducted and a development agreement between Cape Fear Development Partners, LLC (CFD) and New Hanover County was approved with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) of $60,524,860 for the redevelopment of the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, and North Third Street. The project includes the construction of a new, 95,000 square foot modern, purpose - built county museum and library facility by the developer on the northern portion of the block and improvements to the existing parking deck on the same block. The developer will then purchase the southern portion of the site for private mixed -use development, with the purchase price based upon an appraisal process. Upon approval of this agreement in May, staff worked with CFD to finalize the design plans and the project was then sent out in a competitive bid process. The work to update the drawings with selected value engineered options, extensive outreach to bidders— inclusive of minority and/or women -owned business enterprise (MWBE) outreach, and vendor solicitation efforts were very successful and have yielded savings for the county. The revised GMP, outlined in the amended development agreement, for the construction of the museum and library is $55,942,679.This represents a savings of $4,582,182 from the original development agreement with CFD. This project is recommended to be funded through debt proceeds as budgeted and structured as limited obligation bonds. The county will remain in compliance with its debt policy with the issuance of this debt. To move forward with this project, county staff is requesting the approval of a resolution that will allow the county manager or the chief financial officer, with the advice from the county attorney and bond counsel, be authorized and directed to proceed and negotiate on behalf of the county a contract for a principal amount not to exceed $57,000,000 for the financing of this project. Staff also requests that the board direct the chief financial officer or his designee to file with the Local Government Commission an application for its approval of the contract and all relevant transactions contemplated. The issuance of this debt instrument requires a public hearing. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 Staff is proposing that the public hearing be conducted on August 21, 2023 at 9:00 am, concerning the Contract, the Deed of Trust, the proposed Project and any other transactions contemplated therein and associated therewith. Staff requests that the clerk to the board be directed to cause a notice of the public hearing, in the form attached as Exhibit A, to be published once in a qualified newspaper of general circulation within the county no fewer than 10 days prior to the public hearing. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Good Governance Effective County Management ■ Deliver quality service at the right time RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the amendment to the Development Agreement between Cape Fear Development Partners, LLC and New Hanover County for the Redevelopment of the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, and North Third Street, decreasing the guaranteed maximum price to $55,942,679. Adopt the resolution, which among other things directs staff to submit an application for debt issuance to the Local Government Commission and provide notice to conduct a public hearing at the next Board of Commissioners meeting on August 21, 2023 for the debt issuance. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment to De\,elopment Agreement EXHIBIT B Exhibit C.1 Resolution Project Grace Exhibit A Project Grace Staff Presentation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval of the development agreement amendment, adopt resolution, and set the public hearing for the August 21, 2023 board meeting. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT August _, 2023 THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made and entered into on the 16th day of May, 2023, by the COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, a public body, corporate and politic, having its principal office at 230 Government Center Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina (the "County") and CAPE FEAR DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company corporation, having its principal place of business at 102 Autumn Hall Drive, Suite 210, Wilmington, North Carolina, its successors and assigns (the "Developer"), regarding the redevelopment of the County's land located in the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, Second Street and North Third Street, is hereby amended as follows: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Agreement provided that the anticipated project budget to develop and complete the improvements to the Civic and Arts Facilities Parcel and the Parking Parcel was estimated to be Sixty Million, Five Hundred Twenty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($60,524,860.00); WHEREAS, the Agreement provided that after revision to the plans, full permitting of the County's Improvements, including without limitation issuance of a Building Permit, and execution of guaranteed maximum price construction contract with the general contractor (the "GMP Construction Contract"), the Developer will provide a summary of the updated development cost, including, without limitation, the GMP Construction Contract price, which updated summary shall be the "Project Budget". The Project Budget shall be no greater than the estimated budget; WHEREAS, the Developer has provided to the County a summary of the updated development cost, including, without limitation, the GMP Construction Price, and such summary shall be the "Project Budget". Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, this Amendment to the Development Agreement and undertakings hereinafter set forth, the County and the Developer hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. The Project Budget is attached hereto at Exhibit C.1, and identifies a total Project Budget of not to exceed Fifty -Five Million, Nine Hundred Forty -Two Thousand Six Hundred and Seventy -Nine 00/100 Dollars ($55,942,679.00). 2. The construction plans have been updated since the original date of the Agreement, and Exhibit B of the Agreement is replaced with Exhibit B attached hereto to reflect the current construction plans. 3. The value engineering concepts contemplated in the last sentence of Section La. of the Agreement in Exhibit B.1 of the Agreement have been incorporated in to the construction plans and the Project Budget, and therefore, the Agreement is amended to remove the last sentence of Section La. and to remove Exhibit B. 1. 4. The Project Budget being established, the Parties can now establish the specific Development Fee. Therefore, Section I.e. of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety with the following: c. Development Fee. In consideration of the Developer's services provided pursuant to the Project Management Agreement, the County shall pay to the Developer a fee of One Million Eight Hundred Twenty -Nine Thousand Nine hundred One and 00/100 Dollars ($1,829,901.00). 5. Except as hereby amended, all other terms and conditions set forth in the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seals to this Agreement this day of August, 2023. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 2 COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER By: Name: Chris Coudriet Title: Manager CAPE FEAR DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC By: Name: Title: Manager Exhibits Attached B Plans for County Improvements C.1 Project Budget ND:4881-5875-9796, v. 2 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 3 EXHIBIT B Plans for County Improvements 1. Project Grace Architectural Permit Set drawings prepared by LS3P; dated 05.22.2023, as amended by Project Grace Addendum No. 1 prepared by LS3P, dated 06.01.2023, and Project Grace Addendum No. 2 prepared by LS3P, dated 06.22.2023. 2. Project Grace Structural Permit Set drawings prepared by LS3P and Wood Engineering; dated 05.22.2023. 3. Project Grace Civil Permit Set drawings prepared by LS3P and Paramounte Engineering; dated 05.22.2023. 4. Project Grace MEP Permit Set drawings prepared by LS3P and Newcomb & Boyd; dated 05.22.2023. 5. Project Grace Landscape Permit Set drawings prepared by LS3P and Stewart; dated 05.22.2023. 6. Project Grace Specifications Vol. 1 and Vol. 2; dated 05.22.2023. 7. "General" sheets prepared by LS3P and "Code" sheets prepared by Henderson engineers, all dated 05.22.2023. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1 Exhibit C.1 Project Name: GSF Area: Project Grace 95,000 COST/ COST SUMMARY TOTAL COST GSF DESIGN & ENGINEERING $1,818,000 $19.14 CONSTRUCTION $49,386,878 $519.86 CONSTRUCTION ALLOWANCES (carried outside of GMP) $728,000 $7.66 ADMINISTRATIVE $145,000 $1.53 MARKETING $25,000 $0.26 PROFESSIONAL FEES $180,000 $1.89 PROJECT MANAGEMENT FEES $1,829,901 $19.26 CONTINGENCY $1,829,901 $19.26 TOTAL $55,942,679 $589 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 3 - 1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA, AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION OF AN INSTALLMENT FINANCING CONTRACT, DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE WITH RESPECT THERETO, AND PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN OTHER RELATED MATTERS THERETO WHEREAS, the County of New Hanover, North Carolina (the "County") is a validly existing political subdivision, existing as such under and by virtue of the Constitution, statutes and laws of the State of North Carolina (the "State"); WHEREAS, the County has the power, pursuant to the General Statutes of North Carolina to (1) enter into installment contracts in order to purchase, or finance or refinance the purchase of, real or personal property and to finance or refinance the construction or repair of fixtures or improvements on real property and (2) create a security interest in some or all of the property financed or refinanced to secure repayment of the purchase price; WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the County of New Hanover (the "Board") hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the County to finance the capital costs of construction of a new joint library -museum facility and improvements to an existing County parking deck that will serve the new facility (collectively, the "2023A Projects"); WHEREAS, the New Hanover County Financing Corporation (the "Corporation") will assist the County by the issuance of its Limited Obligation Bonds (the "Bonds") to finance the 2023A Projects; WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to finance the 2023A Projects by (1) entering into an Installment Financing Contract (the "Contract") with the Corporation in order to finance the capital costs of the 2023A Projects, and (2) entering into a deed of trust, security agreement and fixture filing (the "Deed of Trust") related to the County's fee simple interest in the real property on which the joint library -museum facility will be located (the "Mortgaged Property"), that will provide security for the County's obligations under the Contract; WHEREAS, the Corporation will execute and deliver its Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $57,000,000, evidencing proportionate undivided interests in rights to receive certain Revenues (as defined in the Contract) pursuant to the Contract; WHEREAS, the County hereby determines that financing the 2023A Projects is essential to the County's proper, efficient and economic operation and to the general health and welfare of its inhabitants; that financing the 2023A Projects will provide an essential use and has and will permit the County to carry out public functions that it is authorized by law to perform; and that entering into the Contract and Deed of Trust is necessary and expedient for the County by virtue of the findings presented herein; WHEREAS, the County hereby determines that the Contract would allow the County to finance the 2023A Projects and take title thereto at a favorable interest rate currently available in the financial marketplace and on terms advantageous to the County; WHEREAS, the County hereby determines that the estimated cost of financing the 2023A Projects, including payment of the costs of execution and delivery, is an amount not to exceed $57,000,000 and that such cost exceeds the amount that can be prudently raised from currently available appropriations, unappropriated fund balances and non -voted bonds that could be issued by the County in the current fiscal year pursuant to Article V, Section 4 of the Constitution of the State; WHEREAS, although the cost of financing the 2023A Projects to the Contract is expected to exceed the cost of financing the 2023A Projects pursuant to a bond financing for the same undertaking, the County hereby determines that the cost of financing the 2023A Projects pursuant to the Contract and Deed of Trust and the obligations of the County thereunder are preferable to a general obligation bond financing or revenue bond financing for several reasons, including but not limited to the following: (1) the cost of a special election necessary to approve a general obligation bond financing, as required by the laws of the State, would result in the expenditure of significant funds; (2) the time required for a general obligation bond election would cause an unnecessary delay which would thereby decrease the financial benefits of financing, constructing, and improving the 2023A Projects; and (3) insufficient revenues are produced by the 2023A Projects so as toyermit a revenue bond fiancin ; oard of Commissioners - August, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 4 - 1 WHEREAS, the County hereby determines that the estimated costs of financing the 2023A Projects pursuant to the Contract reasonably compares with an estimate of similar costs under a bond financing for the same undertaking as a result of the findings delineated in the above preambles; WHEREAS, the County anticipates that any future property tax increase, if necessary, to pay installment payments falling due under the Contract will not be excessive; WHEREAS, the sums to fall due under the Contract will be adequate but not excessive for its proposed purpose; WHEREAS, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, as bond counsel ("Bond Counsel"), will render an opinion to the effect that entering into the Contract and the transactions contemplated thereby are authorized by law; WHEREAS, no deficiency judgment may be rendered against the County in any action for its breach of the Contract, and the taxing power of the County is not and may not be pledged in any way directly or indirectly or contingently to secure any money due under the Contract; WHEREAS, the County is not in default under any of its debt service obligations; WHEREAS, the County's budget process and Annual Budget Ordinance are in compliance with the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act, and external auditors have determined that the County has conformed with generally accepted accounting principles as applied to governmental units in preparing its Annual Budget ordinance; WHEREAS, past audit reports of the County indicate that its debt management and contract obligation payment policies have been carried out in strict compliance with the law, and the County has not been censured by the North Carolina Local Government Commission (the "LGC"), external auditors or any other regulatory agencies in connection with such debt management and contract obligation payment policies; WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Contract after publication of a notice with respect to such public hearing must be held, and approval of the LGC with respect to entering into the Contract must be received; WHEREAS, the County hereby determines that all findings, conclusions and determinations of the County in this Resolution are subject to modification or affirmation after all interested parties have been afforded the opportunity to present their comments at a public hearing regarding the execution and delivery of the Contract and the Deed of Trust and the 2023A Projects financed thereby. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Authorization to Negotiate the Contract. That the County Manager or the Chief Financial Officer, with advice from the County Attorney and Bond Counsel, are hereby authorized and directed to proceed and negotiate on behalf of the County the Contract for a principal amount not to exceed $57,000,000 to finance the 2023A Projects, to be entered into in accordance with the provisions of Section 160A-20 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, as amended, and to provide in connection with the Contract, as security for the County's obligations thereunder, a Deed of Trust conveying a lien and interest in the Mortgaged Property, including the improvements thereon. Section 2. Application to LGC. That the Chief Financial Officer or his designee is hereby directed to file with the LGC an application for its approval of the Contract and all relevant transactions contemplated thereby on a form prescribed by the LGC and to state in such application such facts and to attach thereto such exhibits regarding the County and its financial condition as may be required by the LGC. Section 3. Direction to Retain Professionals. That the County Manager and the Chief Financial Officer, with advice from the County Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to retain the assistance of Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, as bond counsel, First Tryon Advisors, Charlotte North Carolina, as financial advisor, PNC Capital Markets LLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, as underwriter, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee. The County Man erx.nAl he Chief Financial Offi r re hereby authorized to retain such other professionals as they deem necessary in their�udgonmm ssi c rr 9 etean�saction contemplated in this Resolution. Section 4. Public Hearing. That a public hearing (the 'Public Hearing") shall be conducted by the Board on August 21, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Assembly Room, New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, concerning the Contract, the proposed financing, and any other transactions contemplated therein and associated therewith. Section 5. Notice of Public Hearing. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to cause a notice of the Public Hearing, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be published once in a qualified newspaper of general circulation within the County no fewer than 10 days prior to the Public Hearing. Section 6. Repealer. That all motions, orders, resolutions and parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 7. Effective Date. That this Resolution is effective on the date of its adoption. Read, approved, and adopted this 7th day of August, 2023. By: William E. Rivenbark Chair of the Board of Commissioners Kym Crowell Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: K. Jordan Smith County Attorney Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 4 - 3 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the County of New Hanover, North Carolina (the "County") is considering (1) entering into an installment financing contract in an amount not to exceed $57,000,000 (the "Contract") to finance the capital costs of construction of a new joint library -museum facility and improvements to an existing County parking deck that will serve the new facility (collectively, the "2023A Projects") and (2) executing and delivering a deed of trust, security agreement and fixture filing (the "Deed of Trust") related to the County's fee simple interest in the joint library -museum facility, together with the improvements thereon (collectively, the "Mortgaged Property"), as may be required by the entity providing the funds to the County under the Contract. The joint library -museum facility will be located on the north parcel of the Wilmington City Block bounded by Chestnut Street, Grace Street, North Second Street and North Third Street The Mortgaged Property identified above will be mortgaged under the Deed of Trust. The Contract and the Deed of Trust permit the County to enter into amendments to finance additional projects using the Mortgaged Property as collateral and the County may or may not grant additional collateral in connection with such amendments. On payment by the County of all installment payments due under the Contract, including any future amendments to finance or refinance projects, the Deed of Trust and any lien created thereunder will terminate and the County's title to the Mortgaged Property will be unencumbered. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Sections 160A-20 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, that on August 21, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. in the Assembly Room, New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Wilmington, North Carolina, a public hearing will be conducted concerning the approval of the execution and delivery of the Contract and the projects financed thereby. All interested parties are invited to present comments thereon at the public hearing. Published: /s/ KYM CROWELL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners County of New Hanover, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 5 - 1 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ss: COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER I, Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of the County of New Hanover, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and exact copy of a resolution entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER, NORTH CAROLINA, AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION OF AN INSTALLMENT FINANCING CONTRACT, DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE WITH RESPECT THERETO, AND PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN OTHER RELATED MATTERS THERETO' adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the County of New Hanover, North Carolina, at a meeting held on the 7th day of August, 2023. WITNESS my hand and the corporate seal of the County of New Hanover, North Carolina, this the _ day of August, 2023. KYM CROWELL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners County of New Hanover, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 7 - 5 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: County PRESENTER(S): Karen Richards Deputy County Attorney, Chief Deputy Ken Sarvis, New Attorney Hanover County Sheriffs Office CONTACT(S): Karen Richards SU BJ ECT: New Hanover County Plan for Transportation Agreement of NHC Involuntary Commitments (IVC) Respondents as required by NCGS 122C-251 BRIEF SUMMARY: By statute, the Sheriff's Office is required to provide transportation for IVC Respondents to out of county facilities. A transportation plan was implemented for the County to partner with New Hanover Regional Medical Center to facilitate involuntary commitment transportation to approved facilities as required by statute. The proposed revised plan is updated to designate Novant as owner/successor to New Hanover Regional and to expressly authorize Novant to utilize Allied Universal Security Services a third -party transportation agency mutually acceptable to Novant and County. The New Hanover County Sheriff's Office and Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center have partnered to provide quicker service to the members of our community who may need transportation to services that are outside of New Hanover County. This Plan will allow Novant to secure a third party agency to transport a Respondent to a facility quicker than coordinating transport with the Sheriff's Office. By doing so, the Respondent is able to enter the treatment deemed necessary by medical personnel sooner, Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center is able to free up beds quicker, and the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office staff is freed up from transport thus allowing them to tend to community matters. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Superior Public Health & Safety o Sustain the community capacity to prepare for and respond to public safety demands Collaborate to optimize system -wide responses and outcomes RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve agreement. ATTACHMENTS: NEW HANOVER COUNTY TRANSPORT OVERVIEW RESOLUTION ADOPTINGA PLAN SUPPORTING Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 8 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 8 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLAN FOR TRANSPORTATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT RESPONDENTS It is the policy of New Hanover County to transport persons subject to involuntary commitment proceedings ("Respondents") in conformity with the requirements set forth in N.C.G.S. § 122C-251. This plan for transportation of Respondents applies to New Hanover County law enforcement officers and any contract transportation provider designated by the New Hanover County Commissioners pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). SERVICE OF INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT ORDERS ON RESPONDENTS The initial service of an involuntary commitment order upon a Respondent and the initial custody of the Respondent shall be accomplished by a law enforcement officer, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-261(e). Once the Respondent has been committed to a 24-hour facility, transportation to and from that facility can be accomplished by a law enforcement officer or anyone authorized to provide transportation to Respondents pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). TRANSPORTATION OF RESPONDENTS WITHIN NEW HANOVER COUNTY Transportation of Respondents from New Hanover County detention facilities shall be provided by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) for Respondents who reside in New Hanover County or Respondents taken into custody in New Hanover County. Transportation of Respondents between 24-hour facilities within New Hanover County pursuant to involuntary commitment proceedings shall be provided by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office or by an employed or contracted transportation provider of Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center ("NHNHRMC") or Allied Universal Security Services pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). TRANSPORTATION OF RESPONDENTS BETWEEN COUNTIES OR ACROSS STATE LINES Transportation between New Hanover County and other North Carolina counties of a Respondent taken into custody in New Hanover County to a 24-hour facility shall be provided by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office or by an employed or contracted transportation provider of NHNHRMC or Allied Universal Security Services pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). Transportation between counties for Respondents held in 24-hour facilities who have requested a change of venue for their District Court hearing shall be provided by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office or by an employed or contracted transportation provider of NHNHRMC or Allied Universal Security Services pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) if the petition for involuntary commitment was initiated in New Hanover County. Transportation between counties for the discharge of a Respondent from a 24-hour facility shall be provided by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office or by an employed or contracted transportation provider of NHNHRMC or Allied Universal Security Services if the Respondent is a resident of New Hanover County, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). Respondents, upon discharge from a 24-hour facility, may also use their own transportation at their own expense pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-25l(b). Transportation of Respondents between NHNHRMC and the Lighthouse Center of Conway, South Carolina, shall be provided pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) by an employed or contracted transportation provider of NHNHRMC or Allied Universal Security Services if the Respondent is a resident of New Hanover County. PROCEDURES FOR TRANSPORT OF RESPONDENTS Members of the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office, or contract transportation providers designated by New Hanover County pursuant to N.C.G.S § 122C-251(g) may use reasonable force to restrain Respondents if it is necessary to protect themselves, the Respondents, or others. Members of the New Hanover County Sheriff s Office or contract transportation providers designated by New Hanover County should review the applicable Involuntary Commitment Petition and Order or seek information from the 24-hour facility to determine if the Respondent presents a danger of assault or escape during transport. Transportation of Respondents who present a known risk for assaultive, combative behavior during transport will not be performed by NHNHRMC or Allied Universal Security Services. In such cases, the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office will be contacted by NHNHRMC and requested to transport the Respondent. Transportation of Respondents may require the use of restraints. Restraints used in these situations should restrain the Respondent securely, without causing injury. While providing transportation for a Respondent, to the extent feasible, there shall be a driver or attendant who is the same sex as the Respondent present unless a family member of the Respondent is permitted to accompany the Respondent in lieu of an attendant or driver of the same sex as Respondent. To the extent feasible, each Respondent will be transported with the dignity and respect allowed on a case by case basis. COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN PURSUANT TO 122C-251(g) The New Hanover County Sheriff's Office, or any other person or organization contracted to provide transportation of involuntary commitment Respondents, shall be subject to the terms of this plan and shall complete training in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 122C-202.2(3). Such training shall be approved by the New Hanover County Sheriff. An example of such training is "Nonviolent Crisis Intervention" from Crisis Prevention Institute ("CPI"), a training and consulting organization specializing in behavior management. The purpose of the training shall be to provide adequate safety and protection for Respondents, those providing transport, and the public. Members of the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office and contract transportation providers designated by New Hanover County pursuant to N.C.G.S § 122C-251(g) shall provide transportation and follow procedures in this plan and in the applicable statutes found in Article 5, Chapter 122C of the North Carolina General Statutes. References in Article 5 to law enforcement officers shall apply to any contract transportation provider designated by New Hanover County pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) when providing transportation to involuntary commitment Respondents. Contract transportation providers designated by New Hanover County shall agree to indemnify and hold harmless New Hanover County, NHNHRMC, the New Hanover County Sheriff, and their employees and agents. Contract transportation providers designated by New Hanover County shall provide proof of insurance coverage as required by the New Hanover County Sheriff and/or County Manager and NHNHRMC. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLAN FOR TRANSPORATION OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT RESPONDENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute ("N.C.G.S.") § 122C-251(a), New Hanover County has a duty to provide, through its law enforcement officers, transportation under the involuntary commitment proceedings of Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the North Carolina General Statutes for citizens of New Hanover County and any person taken into custody within New Hanover County limits; and WHEREAS, N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) provides that the Board of Commissioners of the County may adopt a plan for the transportation of Respondents in involuntary commitment proceedings, and that private agency personnel may be designated to provide all or part of the transportation required by such proceedings; and WHEREAS, N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g) further provides that persons designated in the plan to provide transportation shall be appropriately trained as set forth in N.C.G.S. § 122C-202.2(a)(3), and the plan shall assure adequate safety and protection for both the public and the Respondent; and WHEREAS, the New Hanover County Sheriffs Office, other local law enforcement officers, and other affected agencies participate jointly in execution of a plan for transportation of Respondents in involuntary commitment proceedings; and WHEREAS, Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center ("NHNHRMC") operates a hospital with several locations throughout New Hanover County; and WHEREAS, NHNHRMC receives into its facilities mental health and substance abuse patients who are Respondents in involuntary commitment proceedings pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the North Carolina General Statutes, and who require transportation services from time to time; and WHEREAS, NHNHRMC does not have the ability or capacity to treat all such mental health and substance abuse patients that it receives; and WHEREAS, other North Carolina facilities, which have the ability or capacity to accept patients requiring transfer from NHNHRMC for mental health or substance abuse care and treatment are frequently located several hours away from NHNHRMC; and WHEREAS, transportation of involuntarily committed patients from NHNHRMC to other North Carolina treatment facilities is currently carried out by the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, due to the time commitment involved in completing such transports, there is often a delay in officer availability to provide transportation for patients awaiting transfer to 24-hour facilities from the NHNHRMC Emergency Department; and WHEREAS, the NHNHRMC Emergency Department at times experiences surges in patient volumes and NHNHRMC desires to provide transportation of appropriate (non-violent) Respondents awaiting transfer in its Emergency Department to shorten wait times and improve efficiency; and WHEREAS, NHNHRMC employs security personnel and has contracted with Allied Universal Security Services for additional staffing to support the provision of transportation services from NHNHRMC for involuntarily committed patients needing transfer who meet appropriate criteria, as determined by the attending healthcare provider; and WHEREAS, to the extent feasible, such transportation of Respondents shall be done with the dignity and respect allowed on a case by case basis; and, WHEREAS, such an arrangement will assist NHNHRMC, New Hanover County, and the New Hanover County Sheriff's Office in fulfilling their obligations under Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the North Carolina General Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners adopts the attached plan titled "New Hanover County Plan for Transportation of New Hanover County Involuntary Commitment Respondents" for transportation of involuntary commitment Respondents between NHNHRMC and other North Carolina treatment facilities by security personnel either directly employed by NHNHRMC or contracted through Allied Universal Security Services to provide transportation services, as permitted by N.C.G.S. § 122C-251(g). Such plan shall include an agreement between NHNHRMC and Allied Universal Security Services for provision of these services at no charge to the County. That agreement shall provide for full compliance with N.C.G.S. § 122C-251 by Allied Universal Security Services and for insurance coverage in amounts acceptable to NHNHRMC and the County. Neither the adoption of the plan nor the designation of NHNHRMC and/or Allied Universal Security Services as an approved transportation provider is or shall be construed as creating any agency or other relationship between the County, NHNHRMC, the Sheriff's Office and/or Allied Universal Security Services. ADOPTED this the day of August, 2023 NEW HANOVER COUNTY William E. Rivenbark, Chairman ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor CONTACT(S): Robert Farrell; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SU BJ ECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z23-12) — Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC, applicant, on behalf of Patricia Roseman with Blue Tank, LLC and Holly Tank, LLC, property owners, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned 1-1, Light Industrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned 1-1 and R-15, Residential located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMF-L, Residential Multi -Family — Low Density for a maximum of 521 residential units consisting of multi -family, attached, and detached residential dwelling units. (See page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map) BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone two parcels totaling approximately 72.39 acres from the 1-1, Light Industrial and R-15, Residential districts to the (CZD) RMF-L, Residential Multi -Family - Light Density for a maximum of 521 residential units consisting of multi -family, attached, and detached dwelling units. The proposed concept plan is for a maximum 521 dwelling units consisting of multi -family, single-family attached and single-family detached units. It is currently anticipated that the proposal will be developed over four phases. The multi- family phase will be located at the corner of Holly Shelter and Blue Clay Road and total a maximum of 243 units, and three phases of mixed single-family attached and detached dwellings on the southern parcel totaling 278 units. Access for the multi -family component of the development is proposed from Blue Clay and Holly Shelter while the remaining single-family units would be accessed from Blue Clay Road. The concept plan does not include vehicular connectivity between the multi -family and single-family developments; however, a condition has been provided guaranteeing bicycle and pedestrian interconnectivity. Addition of vehicle connectivity would change the assumed conditions analyzed as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and require a revision to the approved TIA. Both the multi -family and single-family portions of the project include stormwater, open space, and designated amenities. Public water is currently available to the site through CFPUA. A sewer force main extension east from 1-40 is necessary to support the proposed density and unit count. The project is anticipated to connect to the county and CFPUA's joint sewer extension capital project along Holly Shelter Road. The R-15 and 1-1 zoning districts in this area were established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. The 1-1 zoning designation for this property reflected the industrial uses already in existence at the time this area of the county was initially zoned. Portions of both of the parcels were rezoned from the original R-15 and 1-1 zoning to the current zoning in 2000 in rezoning case Z-708. With that approval, a 75' foot wide strip of R-15 was left to serve as a buffer between the 1-1 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 district and the single-family residential across the Blue Clay Road right-of-way. The purpose of the RMF-L district is to accommodate lands for moderate density single family and low -density multi- family development of varying types and designs. The intent is that the RMF-L district will provide options for alternative housing types near or in direct relationship to single-family detached development with a range of housing options. The proposal has an overall density of 7.19 dwelling units per acre. The maximum allowed density in the RMF-L district is 10 units per acre. Performance residential developments are subject to specific setback standards. Buildings within a performance residential development require a minimum setback of 20 feet from an adjoining property line. The applicant has provided a condition restricting the maximum height of structures on the parcel to not exceed 45' and no taller than 3 stories. Multi -family and nonresidential structures of this height within an RMF district are subject to a 30-foot required setback when abutting general residential zoned lots. Transitional buffers also serve as a mitigation method to limit impacts on adjacent uses. Opaque buffers are required between more intense residential uses when adjacent to parcels accommodating single-family detached and/or duplex dwelling units. For this type of development, set -aside dedicated open space must amount to at least 20 percent of the site. The site plans indicate that the dedicated open space exceeds this required amount. The site is accessed at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road, an NCDOT major collector road, and Blue Clay Road, an NCDOT major collector road. Currently, the site is undeveloped. If developed at the typical build out, the property could support 545,000 square feet of General Industrial, the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area within the 1-1 zoning district, and 7 single-family dwellings, the typical development allowed within the R-15 zoning district. It is estimated that a 545,000 square foot development of General Industrial and 7 single-family dwellings would generate approximately 408 AM peak hour trips and 361 PM peak hour trips. It is estimated that the proposed development of 521 total residential units of which 243 are multi -family units, and 278 mixed single-family attached and detached dwelling units, would generate approximately 237 AM peak hour trips and 288 PM peak hour trips. This is a reduction in the estimated generated trips by 171 AM peak hour trips and 73 PM peak hour trips. New developments that are anticipated to generate more than 100 trips during any peak hour period are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of their rezoning application. A team of NCDOT, WMPO, and County planning staff work with an applicant's traffic engineers to develop the scope for the TIA, including the study area, the traffic data which must be collected, trip distribution, and the developments and background traffic growth that must be analyzed. This document is used to identify off -site transportation improvements required to mitigate the impacts of the development and must be approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. The proposed project is located along two NCDOT maintained roads, both of which are under capacity. The applicant has had a TIA approved by the NCDOT and WMPO requiring several roadway improvements, including signalization of a nearby intersection, the addition of new turning lanes, and the lengthening of tapers and storage lanes. The subject site is in close proximity to the 1-40 — Holly Shelter Road interchange and the future Holly Shelter Business Park, which are expected to generate more commercial traffic once developed. The approved TIA can be viewed here. Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary School, Holly Shelter Middle School, and Laney High School. A maximum of 7 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R- 15 zoning density, and 521 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 514 dwelling units. Based on a generalized historic generation rate, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in an increase of approximately 113 more students than the number of students who are estimated to be already Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 generated under the existing zoning. 1-1 Light I ndustrial, 1-2 Heavy I ndustrial, and R-15 Residential zoning surround the immediate site, and B-2 zoning exists at the 1-40 and Holly Shelter Road interchange. The subject site is located adjacent to existing industrial uses, with heavy industrial located across Blue Clay Road and Holly Shelter Road. Other heavy industrial uses exist to the east and utilize Holly Shelter Road as their access point. An additional condition developed in conjunction with the applicant and County Attorney's office has been included with this request requiring a disclosure to future owners and residents of the potential impacts such as noise, vibration, and heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways from nearby existing and future commercial and industrial development. The proposal is located within one -mile of a County invested business development, the future Holly Shelter Business Park. This development is expected to generate an increase in industrial and commercial traffic along the Holly Shelter Road corridor. The development could serve as a transition between the industrial zoning to the north and west from the single-family residential parcels to the south and east. The subject site is located just east of the 1-40 — Holly Shelter Road interchange, an area that is primarily zoned for commercial development. This proposal could provide for housing that could support future commercial and industrial development within the area. The General Residential place type focuses on small-scale, lower density housing, associated civic and limited commercial services development that enhances neighborhood character. Types of appropriate uses include single- family residential, low -density multi -family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. Furthermore, the housing types permitted by the proposed rezoning offer diverse housing options that could support commercial and industrial developments anticipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. The Planning Board considered this application at the July 6, 2023 meeting. One member of the public representing a neighboring industrial use spoke in opposition citing concerns with the proximity and compatibility of residential development near existing industrial development. The Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the petition with three conditions related to pedestrian interconnectivity, structure height, and a recorded declaration statement regarding nearby industrial development. The board found the application to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low -density, single-family residential uses. The board also found RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request was reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 • Intelligent Growth & Economic Development o Encourage development of complete communities in the unincorporated county ■ Ensure NHC has appropriate housing to support business growth RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff's recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. The proposal promotes the uses recommended within the General Residential place type, and supports the Comprehensive Plan's goal to provide for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. The proposal could accommodate residential developments that would support commercial and industrial developments that are anticipated within the area. While the Comprehensive Plan recommendation for this site was established prior to plans for the Holly Shelter Business Park, the proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally consistent with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the density and range of housing options recommended within the General Residential place type, and the housing types permitted by the proposed rezoning would provide diverse housing options that could support commercial and industrial developments anticipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. As a result, staff concurs with the Planning Board recommendation and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low -density, single-family residential uses. I also find APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following conditions: Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi -family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45' in height and a maximum of 3 stories. 3. A declaration statement shall be recorded in the property's chain of title, at the New Hanover County Registry, stating the property is in proximity to existing and future commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, and heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, which activities may occur any time during the day or night. Such declaration shall also be provided with all future leases. Alternative Motion for Denial (If based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to Conditional RMF-L, district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 ATTACHMENTS: BOC Script M3-12 BOC Staff Report Z23-12 Zoning Map Z23-12 Future Land Use Map Z23-12 Mailout Map Initial Application Co\,er Sheet Application Materials The Oasis Rezoning Plans TA Approval Letter TA Executi\,e Summary Concept Plan Corer Sheet The Oasis Concept Plan Public Comment Z23-12 Staff Presentation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with staff conditions. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z23-12) Rezoning Request (Z23-12) — Request by William Block with Olympus Holding Company Castle I Hayne, LLC, applicant, to rezone approximately 23.01 acres zoned 1-1, Light Industrial and approximately 49.38 acres zoned 1-1 and R-15, Residential located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road to (CZD) RMF-L, Residential Multi -Family — Low Density for a maximum of 521 residential units consisting of multi -family, attached, and detached residential dwelling units. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation and supporter comments (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low -density, single- family residential uses. I also find APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following conditions: Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi -family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45' in height and a maximum of 3 stories. 3. A declaration statement shall be recorded in the property's chain of title, at the New Hanover County Registry, stating the property is in proximity to existing and future Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 1 - 1 commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, and heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, which activities may occur any time during the day or night. Such declaration shall also be provided with all future leases. Alternative Motion for Denial (If based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to [Approve/Deny] of the proposed rezoning to a CZD RMF-M and B-1 district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-12 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z23-12 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L, Residential Multi -family Low Density District Applicant: Property Owner(s): William Block, Olympus Holding Company Castle Blue Tank LLC and Holly Tank LLC Hayne LLC Location: Acreage: 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay 72.39 Road PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: RO1 100-008-01 1-002 & RO1 100-008-010- General Residential 000 Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: 521 residential units comprised of multi - Vacant Land family, single-family attached and detached units Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: 1-1, Light Industrial District and R-15, Residential (CZD) RMF-L, Conditional Residential Multi - District Family Low Density District SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Heavy Industrial and undeveloped land 1-2 East Heavy Industrial, Single -Family Residential 1-2, R-15 South Single -Family Residential R-15 West FAA Navigational Tower 1-1 Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 1 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 1 ZONING HISTORY July 7, 1972 Initially zoned I-1 and R-15 (Area 8A) August 7, 2000 Portions of both parcels rezoned from R-15 to 1-1 in Z-708 COMMUNITY SERVICES Water is available through CFPUA. CFPUA would require an on -site sewer Water/Sewer pump station with a force main. CFPUA and New Hanover County are partnering on a proposed force main extension capital project along Holly Shelter Road from 1-40 eastward to the future Holly Shelter business park. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Castle Hayne Station Schools Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High Schools Recreation Northern Regional Park, Riverside Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 2 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 2 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN APAMMff MATE DME VM PAW10 CWN 9lGT,ON r MI&4ff fA ENN4p M%rTIDN —•^ mammwxowx 1 wm m.re , ws NORTH \ ..... TITIdL T74NM7�! 11iM17 DPfR11'0.Y ADAO :•..-.. J \ ClgOS 2G�IgI1 Single -Family Attached and + / Detached Dwellings Phases -a � 2, 3 & 4 Multi -Family Phase 1 �I I � I a, (o Amenity Spaces ]r I m H 10 e, Blue Clay Road Access Points Includes Staff Markups • The proposed concept plan is for a maximum 521 dwelling units consisting of multi -family, single-family attached and single-family detached units. It is currently anticipated that the proposal will be developed over four phases. The multi -family phase will be located at the corner of Holly Shelter and Blue Clay Road and total a maximum of 243 units, and three phases of mixed single-family attached and detached dwellings on the southern parcel totaling 278 units. • Access for the multi -family component of the development is proposed from Blue Clay and Holly Shelter while the remaining single-family units would be accessed from Blue Clay Road. There is not vehicular connectivity between the multi -family and single-family developments however a condition has been provided guaranteeing bicycle and pedestrian interconnectivity. • Both the multi -family and single-family portions of the project include stormwater, open space, and designated amenities. Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 3 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 3 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 and 1-1 zoning districts in this area were established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. The 1-1 zoning designation for this property reflected the industrial uses already in existence at the time this area of the county was initially zoned. • Portions of both of the parcels were rezoned from the original R-15 and I-1 zoning to the current zoning in 2000 in rezoning case Z-708. With that approval, a 75' foot wide strip of R-15 was left to serve as a buffer between the 1-1 district and the single-family residential across the Blue Clay Road right-of-way. • There has been a trend of parcels transitioning to denser residential districts in this portion of the county, including parcels rezoned to R-5, Moderate -High Density and RMF-L districts along Blue Clay Road, Dairy Farm Road, and Sidbury Road to the south. • The purpose of the RMF-L district is to accommodate lands for moderate density single family and low -density multi -family development of varying types and designs. The intent is that the RMF-L district will provide options for alternative housing types near or in direct relationship to single-family detached development with a range of housing options. • The proposal has an overall density of 7.19 dwelling units per acre. The maximum allowed density in the RMF-L district is 10 units per acre. • Performance residential developments are subject to specific setback standards. Buildings within a Performance Residential Development require a minimum setback of 20 feet from an adjoining property line. • The applicant has provided a condition restricting the maximum height of structures on the parcel to not exceed 45' and no taller than 3 stories. Multi -family and nonresidential structures of this height within an RMF district are subject to a 30-foot required setback when abutting general residential zoned lots. • Transitional buffers also serve as a mitigation method to limit impacts on adjacent uses. Opaque buffers are required between more intense residential uses when adjacent to parcels accommodating single-family detached and/or duplex dwelling units. • For this type of development, set -aside dedicated open space must amount to at least 20 percent of the site. The site plans indicate that the dedicated open space exceeds this required amount. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 4 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 4 AREA DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY —•••—STIP Project Approved TIA Subdivisions Under Construction 0 Subject Site Oasis RMF-L O Lake Pointe Lake Pointe Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 5 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 5 TRANSPORTATION Site Access Apartment Access 1: e1teC�Roaa Holly Shelter Road Ho,,y►Sh N Apartment Access 2:. "t T Holly Shelter Road _ -- -~ t y Townhome Access 1: Blue Clay Road LO Townhome Access 2: - Blue Clay Road CURRENT CONDITIONS 69.46 acres of 1-1 Zoning 545,000 sq ft Possible Intensity of ITE Code 1 10 ( ) the typical build out of a building at 1 8% of the total site area Current Zoning 2.94 acres of R-15 Zoning 7 Single-family Dwellings (ITE Code 210) PROPOSED ACCESS Multi -family Phase Single-family Phase Primary Access Holly Shelter Road Blue Clay Road Secondary Access Blue Clay Road - Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 6 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 6 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway(s) Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road Type of Roadway(s) Holly Shelter Road — Major collector road Blue Clay Road — Major collector road Roadway Planning Holly Shelter Road — 13,895 Capacity (AADT) Blue Clay Road — 13,895 Latest Traffic Volume Holly Shelter Road — 6,800 (2021) (AADT) Blue Clay Road — 2,100 (2021) Latest WMPO Point -in -Time Not available near subject parcel County (DT) Current Level of Under Capacity Congestion Source of Planning Capacity: WMPO Sources Source of Latest Traffic Volumes: NCDOT (2021) TRAFFIC GENERATION Potential Traffic Traffic Generated Potential Impact Generation at Current by Proposed of Proposed Potential Build Out Designation Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 408 237 -171 PM Peak Hour Trips 361 288 -73 Potential Current Zoning Build Out — 545,000 square feet of General Industrial, the typical build out of a building at 18% of the total site area within the 1-1 zoning district, and 7 single- family dwellings, the typical development allowed within the R- Assumptions 15 zoning district. Proposed Development — 521 total residential units of which 243 are multi -family units, and 278 mixed single-family attached and detached dwelling units. Sources WMPO & approved TIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) New developments that are anticipated to generate more than 100 trips during any peak hour period are required to submit a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of their rezoning application. A team of NCDOT, WMPO, and County planning staff work with an applicant's traffic engineers to develop the scope for the TIA, including the study area, the traffic data which must be collected, trip distribution, and the developments and background traffic growth that must be analyzed. This document is used to identify off -site transportation improvements required to mitigate the impacts of the development and must be approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. Approval Date April 12, 2023 Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 7 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 7 Development Proposal 57 single family detached dwellings, 231 single-family attached Analyzed dwellings, and 240 multi -family housing (Mid -rise) units. - Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 EB Ramps - Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 WB Ramps - Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road - Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road Study Intersections - Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive - Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 - 253 AM peak hour trips Trip Generation - 288 PM peak hour trips - 3,410 average daily trips October 25, 2022 - 1-40 Michael Jordan Fwy On/Off-Ramp and Holly Traffic Data Collection Shelter Road - Blue Clay Road at Holly Shelter Road - Dairy Farm Road and Sidbury Road - 5% to/from the North via 1-40 - 30% to/from the South via 1-40 Trip Distribution and - 10% to/from the East via Holly Shelter Road Assignment - 10% to/from the East via Sidbury Road - 20% to/from the West via Holly Shelter Road - 25% to/from the West via Sidbury Road Approved Developments & - Growth Rate — 2% per year Background Growth - Signalize the intersection at 1-40 Eastbound Ramp at SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) - At 1-40 Westbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road), either signalize the intersection and provide necessary coordination (recommended) or construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on 1-40 westbound ramps, with 400 feet of storage, appropriate Required Improvements deceleration, and taper. - At the intersection of SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road), construct an eastbound right turn lane on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper and construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) with 100 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 8 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 8 - At SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and Site Access #1, construct an eastbound right turn eastbound right turn taper of 200 feet on SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road), construct site access (northbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for northbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #2, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #3, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. - At SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access #4, construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 75 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane, and provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SUMMARY The proposed project is located along two NCDOT maintained roads, both of which are under capacity. The applicant has had a TIA approved by the NCDOT and WMPO requiring several roadway improvements, including signalization of a nearby intersection, the addition of new turning lanes, and the lengthening of tapers and storage lanes. The subject site is in close proximity to the 1-40 — Holly Shelter Road interchange and the future Holly Shelter Business Park, which are expected to generate more commercial traffic once developed. ENVIRONMENTAL • The parcel is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area. • The entire site is within the Holly Shelter Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitations), Class III (severe limitations), and Class IV (unsuitable) soils. • CFPUA and New Hanover County are partnering on a proposed force main extension capital project along Holly Shelter Road from 1-40 eastward to the future Holly Shelter business park. Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 9 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 9 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools • Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary School, Holly Shelter Middle, and Laney High School. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools. A maximum of 7 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning density, and 521 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 514 dwelling units. Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in an increase of approximately 1 13 more students than the number of students who are estimated to be already generated under the existing zoning. The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students. Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study. Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high Typical Development 7 residential units Total: 2 under Current Zoning (1 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Potential Development Total: 1 15 under Proposed Zoning 521 residential units (47 elementary, 26 middle, 36 high) District *The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out - of -district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech. **Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the approximate total. Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades. Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 10 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 10 School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year) Projected Capacity of Funded or Total Enrollment Assigned Capacity of Planned Level NHC School of School Assigned School Capacity Capacity Assignment w/Portables Upgrades School Elementary 91 % Castle 422 523 81 % None Hayne Middle 92% Holly 851 991 86% None Shelter High 1 99% Laney 1 2214 1941 114% None *Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year. **Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time. • The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data, planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded. NEW HANOVER COUNTY STRATEGIC PLAN • One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 2018-2023 is to encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services. • The proposed RMF-L conditional zoning district (CZD) would allow for an increase in housing diversity. • The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 76%. Under the proposed RMF-L district the site would allow for multi -family attached (apartments), and single family attached (townhomes) and increase housing type diversity by reducing the percentage of single family detached (76% to 60%) and increasing the percentage of multi -family units (0% to 10%) and single family attached units (9% to 18%). • The subject property is located in the Castle Hayne community area, where 29% of residents currently live within one -mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples, pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor's office, child & adult care, etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.). Under the proposed RMF- L district and because the number of proposed units would be beyond one -mile of current basic goods and services, the number of residences within one -mile of goods and services would decrease to 26%. Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 11 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 11 Existing Conditions Holly Shelter Road looking east Subject site from Blue Clay Road Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Holly Shelter Road looking west Concrete plant across Blue Clay Road Page 12 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 12 Representative Developments Representative Developments of 1-1 (Existing ZoninglLand UseL- Light Industrial within Dutch Square Light Industrial within the N Kerr Business Park Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 13 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 13 Representative Developments Representative Development of R-15 (Existing ZonincilLand Used Clay Crossing Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 14 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 14 Representative Developments Representative Developments of Single-family Attached & Multi -family Developments (Proposed Land Use Woodlands of Echo Farms (City of Wilmington) Stephen's Pointe Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 15 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 15 Context and Compatibility • The subject property is located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road. Both roadways are NCDOT maintained major collector roads. • 1-1 Light Industrial, 1-2 Heavy Industrial, and R-15 Residential zoning surround the immediate site, and B-2 zoning exists at the 1-40 and Holly Shelter Road interchange. • The subject site is located adjacent to existing industrial uses, with heavy industrial located across Blue Clay Road and Holly Shelter Road. Other heavy industrial uses exist to the east and utilize Holly Shelter Road as their access point. • The proposal is located within one mile of a County invested business development, the future Holly Shelter Business Park. This development is expected to generate an increase in industrial and commercial traffic along the Holly Shelter Road corridor. • The development could serve as a transition between the industrial zoning to the north and west from the single-family residential parcels to the south and east. • The subject site is located just east of the 1-40 — Holly Shelter Road interchange, an area that is primarily zoned for commercial development. This proposal could provide for housing that could support future commercial and industrial development within the area. • The applicant has designated buffering between the proposal and the existing single-family dwellings to the east and south. • An additional condition developed in conjunction with the applicant and County Attorney's office has been included with this request requiring a disclosure to future owners and residents of the potential impacts from nearby existing and future commercial and industrial development. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 16 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 16 Future Land Use General Residential Map Place Type Focuses on small-scale, lower density housing, associated civic and limited Place Type commercial services development that enhances neighborhood character. Description Types of appropriate uses include single-family residential, low -density multi -family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational projects. The subject property is in the northern portion of the county, located along Holly Shelter Road between the 1-40 access ramps and Blue Clay Road. Zoning along and directly off of this corridor includes a mix of residential uses, commercial zoning, and industrial zoning. Residential development patterns within the general area have progressively changed with more moderate densities. The General Residential place type provides opportunities for low to moderate density housing. While the proposed RMF-L district allows for a maximum of 10 dwelling units/acre, which is higher than the density range recommended for the General Residential place type (approximately 8 units/acre), the proposed development has a density of 7.19 dwellings units/acre. This density is generally consistent with the density range of the place type. Analysis The General Residential place type provides for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. Development within this place type accommodates residential developments that can support commercial and industrial developments that are associated and promoted within other place types, such as the Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. Along with the preferred density range, the proposal promotes the uses recommended within the General Residential place type and supports the Comprehensive Plan's goal to provide for a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. The subject site is located between areas designated as Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. The proposed rezoning would accommodate residential developments that could support commercial and industrial developments that are anticipated within these place types and is in line with the existing residential development on nearby parcels. The proposed RMF-L rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range Consistency of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. Recommendation Furthermore, the housing types permitted by the proposed rezoning offer diverse housing options that could support commercial and industrial developments anticipated within the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 17 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 17 PLANNING BOARD MEETING The Planning Board considered this application at the July 6, 2023 meeting. One member of the public representing a neighboring industrial use spoke in opposition citing concerns with the proximity and compatibility of residential development near existing industrial development. The Planning Board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the petition with the following conditions: Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi -family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45' in height and a maximum of 3 stories. 3. A declaration statement shall be recorded in the property's chain of title, at the New Hanover County Registry, stating the property is in proximity to existing and future commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, and heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, which activities may occur any time during the day or night. Such declaration shall also be provided with all future leases. The Planning Board found the application to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low -density, single-family residential uses. The Planning Board also found RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the rezoning request was reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff's recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations, and technical review. The project promotes the uses recommended within the General Residential place type and supports the Comprehensive Plan's goal to provide a range of housing types and opportunities for households of different sizes and income. The proposed residential development could also support commercial and industrial developments anticipated in the area. As a result, staff concurs with the Planning Board recommendation and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to an RMF-L district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project provides for the density and range of housing options recommended in the General Residential place type. The project could also serve as a transition between adjacent industrial zoning and adjacent low -density, single-family residential uses. I also find APPROVAL of the project is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal could Z23-1 2 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 18 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 18 accommodate residential uses that could support the nearby Employment Center and Commerce Zone place types, with the following conditions: Proposed Conditions: 1. The applicant provide bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the multi- family phase development and the single-family phased development. 2. No structure on the parcel shall exceed 45' in height and a maximum of 3 stories. 3. A declaration statement shall be recorded in the property's chain of title, at the New Hanover County Registry, stating the property is in proximity to existing and future commercial and industrial activities that may result in noise, vibration, and heavy vehicle traffic on area roadways, which activities may occur any time during the day or night. Such declaration shall also be provided with all future leases. Alternative Motion for Denial (If based on information presented at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds denial appropriate.) I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a Conditional RMF-L district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed density is in line with the residential housing densities outlined for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal will adversely impact existing and future non-residential development along an industrialized corridor and would also result in the loss of industrially zoned land. Z23-12 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 19 of 19 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 19 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Z23-12 5210 Holly Shelter Rd & R-15 & 1-1 5735 Blue Clay Road A�� J �O c9� - Future Land Use COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY MIXED USE CONSERVATION Z23-12 kil 0 n . 6 ' Proposed Zoning/Use: RMF-L New Hanover Co r jk !I, r F Initial Application Documents & Materials Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 6 - 1 Docu&gn Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 1 10 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county's online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. (Optional) Pre -Application,' Conference i --- 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) William Block Blue Tank LLC Company Company/Owner Name 2 Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC Address Address 4 Percy Street 24 Backfn Pt City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Charleston, SC 29403 Wilmington, NC 28411 Phone 910-791-6707 Phone Consultant: Paramounte Engineering Email Email aengebretson@paramounte-eng.com Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 1 Page 1 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay Rd Parcel Identification Number(s) R01100-008-011-002 Castle Hayne, NC 28429 R01100-008-010-000 Total Parcel(s) Acreage + 23.01 Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification ac ± 49.38 ac 1-1 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: RMF-L I Total Acreage of Proposed District: ± 72.39 ac I Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. See Attached 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7-C2onditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 Docu&gn Envelope ID: 2E91ECSE-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADDA 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, A Traffic Impact Analysis (TEA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. See Attached ITE Land Use: Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: I PM peak Hour Trips: 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at -large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 3 Page 3 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA 2. Flow would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future land Use Map. See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 4 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 4 Conditional Zoning District Application -- Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope 0: 2E91EC8E-A76E•40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N/A", Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist Ap icaRf Initial This application form, completed and signed Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres DS • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review Community meeting written summary n Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. DS • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on 515the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda. I Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning 7 Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements 13 For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. C For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights -of -way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights -of -way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwoter management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 5 Page 5 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA 7. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and 4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval. I', �' 26/20: �' l�St�aY_ Signature of Prop*" Own*r(s) ��I Docu Signed by: (AWM I"".& Signature of Applicant/Agent r i( i.r M. Roserryr Print Name(s) william Block Print Name Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be colendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning websife will be required. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 6 Page 6 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517.87A2-6D16528320E2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county's online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) William Block Holly Tank LLC Company Company/Owner Name 2 Olympus Hoping Company Castle Hayne, LLC Address Address 4 Percy Street 24 Backfin Pt City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Charleston, SC 29403 Wilmington, NC 28411 Phone 910-791-6707 Phone Consultant: Paramounte Engineering Email Email aengehretson aaparamounte-eng.com Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 7 Page 1 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay Rd Parcel Identification Number(s) R01100-008-011-002 Castle Hayne, NC 28429 R01100-008-010-000 Total Parcel(s) Acreage + 23.01 Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification ac ± 49.38 ac 1-1 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: RMF-L I Total Acreage of Proposed District: ± 72.39 ac I Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. See Attached 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 -conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: See Attached Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: I PM Peak Hour Trips: 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at -large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9- 7- 9 Page 3 of 5 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-69AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 page 4 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 10 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D1652832OE2 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N/A". Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist ] This application form, completed and signed i7 Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review t Community meeting written summary Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. Ap,4kaM Initial LP f2 • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on os the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda. F�J5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page NJ os Reference of the property requested for rezoning 7 Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights -of -way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights -of -way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DSH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwoter management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance U One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. One 11 ) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 5 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 11 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 7. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and ,Provide written consent to any and all cauM loos of approval. Fdr.ftA. 9l _ Y 26/2023 Patric is M. Roscrrar r�tMrt Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s) U F�&. Docusigned�JWby: , & Signature of App�icanf/Agent william Block Print Name Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 12 Page b of b Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517.87A2-6D16528320E2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county's online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) William Block Holly Tank LLC Company Company/Owner Name 2 Olympus Hoping Company Castle Hayne, LLC Address Address 4 Percy Street 24 Backfin Pt City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Charleston, SC 29403 Wilmington, NC 28411 Phone 910-791-6707 Phone Consultant: Paramounte Engineering Email Email aengehretson aaparamounte-eng.com Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 13 Page 1 of 6 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E91EC8E-A76E-40DF-AE90-F2DF3641ADOA 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; 5735 Blue Clay Rd Parcel Identification Number(s) R01100-008-011-002 Castle Hayne, NC 28429 R01100-008-010-000 Total Parcel(s) Acreage + 23.01 Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification ac ± 49.38 ac 1-1 & R-15; Vacant Land General Residential 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: RMF-L I Total Acreage of Proposed District: ± 72.39 ac I Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. See Attached 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7-C1o4nditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: See Attached Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: I PM Peak Hour Trips: 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at -large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 15 Page 3 of 5 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-69AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 page 4 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 16 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D1652832OE2 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N/A". Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist ] This application form, completed and signed i7 Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review t Community meeting written summary Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. Ap,4kaM Initial LP f2 • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on os the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda. F�J5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page NJ os Reference of the property requested for rezoning 7 Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights -of -way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights -of -way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DSH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwoter management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance U One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. One 11 ) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 5 of 6 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 17 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: A292A26F-59AE-4517-87A2-6D16528320E2 7. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and ,Provide written consent to any and all cauM loos of approval. Fdr.ftA. 9l _ Y 26/2023 Patric is M. Roscrrar r�tMrt Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Name(s) U F�&. Docusigned�JWby: , & Signature of App�icanf/Agent william Block Print Name Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 18 Page b of b Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: E76E5BF8-47F9-47A3-BAC4-68DBFB566D2B Print Form NEW HANGER COUNTY PLANNING S& LAND USE A UTHO, ITY F'OR APPOINTMENT OF'AGENT 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910-798-7165 phone 910-798-7053 fax www.nhcgov.com Please note that for quasi-judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent dcscribcd heroin as their exclusive agcnt for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached pctition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper pctition and the rcquircd supplemental information and matcrials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indircctly conncctcd with or arising out of any pctition applicable to the Ncw Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property 'game owner Name Address 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; William Block Holly Tank LLG 5735 Blue Clay Rd Company Owner Name 2 City, state, Zip Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC Blue Tank LLC Castle Hayne, NC 28429 Address Address Parcel ID 4 Percy Street 24 Backtin Pt R01100-008-011-002 City, State, lip Cite, State, Zip R01100-008-010-000 Charleston, SC 29403 Wilmirgton, NC 28411 Phone Phone 910.791.6707 Email Enriil aengebretson[7a paramounte-eng.com Application Tracldng Taformation (Staff Only) Case Number Reference: DatelTime received; Received by: This document was willfully executed on the day of ErDocuSigned by: ahV (A'& At. I�MUMaVu )MFNZFA13aS1 [21l;1t LI l'C 4/26/2023 Owner 2 Si -nature , 20 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 19 09 l4 DocuSign Envelope ID: E76E5BF8-47F9-47A3-BAC4-68DBFB566D2B Print Form NEW HANGER COUNTY PLANNING S& LAND USE A UTHO, ITY F'OR APPOINTMENT OF'AGENT 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910-798-7165 phone 910-798-7053 fax www.nhcgov.com Please note that for quasi-judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described heroin as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use permit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached pctition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper pctition and the rcquircd supplemental information and matcrials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indircctly conncctcd with or arising out of any pctition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property 'game owner Name Address 5210 Holly Shelter Rd; Paramounte Engineering, Inc. Holly Tank LLG 5735 Blue Clay Rd Company Owner Name 2 City, State, Zip Paramounte Engineering, Inc. Blue Tank LLC Castle Hayne: NC 28429 :'address Address Parcel ID 122 Cinema Drive 24 Backtin Pt R01100-008-011-002 Citv, state, Zip Cite, State, Zip R01100-008-010-000 Wilmington, NG 28403 Wilmington, NC 28411 Phone Phone 910.791.6707 Email Enriil aengebretson[7a paramounte-eng.com Application Tracldng Taformation (Staff Only) Case Number Reference: DatelTime received; Received by: This document was willfully executed on the day of DocuSigned by: pafViGia dot,. F6 ,WMA, apEV8AD 34 wl�er 1Clattiie 4/26/2023 Owner 2 Signature , 20 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 20 09 l4 PARAMOUNTE E N G I " E E fZ I N G, 1 N C. Supplemental Application Information Proposed Conditional Rezoning by Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC New Hanover County Parcels R01 100-008-01 1-002 & R01 100-008-010-000 (Approx. 72.4 acres located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road) 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative. The proposed conditional zoning would allow the subject parcel to be developed with a mixture of townhomes and multi -family units consisting of a maximum of 521 units. The existing zoning is split between 1-1 Industrial and small portion R-15 residential along Blue Clay Road. 243 multi -family units are proposed near to the corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road with a primary site access located on Holly Shelter away from the intersection of Blue Clay Road. A proposed secondary apartment access is located at Blue Clay Road across from the S&W Ready Mix site. while the townhomes are located further south on Blue Clay Road closer to existing housing. The conditional rezoning plan depicts townhomes with four or more attached units, and current market conditions indicate this is how the project will remain. However, the applicant requests the ability to mix the residential types outside of the apartments. RMF-L allows multiple residential product types including single family, duplex, triplex and quadraplex as well as townhomes/rowhouses. We request the ability to provide a mixture of units for the 278 units proposed outside of the apartment area in accordance with the residential types allowed in RMF-L. The applicant understands that any change in unit mix will require review by New Hanover County Planning staff to assure compliance with the rezoning plan and by NCDOT/WMPO to assure the proposed project is still compliant with the Traffic Impact Analysis as approved or revised as needed. Major changes to the plan will require a new submittal to New Hanover County Planning The site is currently zoned for industrial use and a small portion along Blue Clay Road is zoned R15 for residential use. The proposed mixed residential zoning would be more compatible with existing homes on Blue Clay Road and would also be aligned with the General Residential place type applied to this area by the Comprehensive Plan. The Holly Shelter corridor near the site currently has a mixture of uses including industrial and more intensive uses before stepping down to the less intense business and residential uses along Blue Clay Road. Keeping with the existing development pattern, we propose clustering the apartments along Holly Shelter thereby creating a transition from the more intense zoning use along Holly Shelter to the less intense residential portion of our project along Blue Clay Road. 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, WILIVII N G T ❑ N, N C 2 6 40 3 F H ( 9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 21 A TIA was completed for the proposed development and approved by the WMPO and NCDOT. The notable required roadway improvements include signalizing Holly Shelter Road at the I-40 interchange and installing new turn lanes at the Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road intersection. 4. Proposed Conditions) The development will be built in accordance with the conditional rezoning plan, the UDO, and any approved modifications to the plan. 5. Traffic Impact *See provided Traffic Impact Analysis 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. The proposal will help provide and increase the range of housing options in northern New Hanover County, consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is also accessed by major collector roadways and is in close proximity to Castle Hayne, 1-40, and educational facilities (Castle Hayne Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and CFCC). The proposed density is consistent with the recommendations of the General Residential place type. Lastly, the design of the development would concentrate the density in multi -family structures adjacent Holly Shelter Road closer to areas classified as Community Mixed Use on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed townhomes are closer to the existing residential homes on Blue Clay Road. 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. The subject site is classified as General Residential on the Future Land Use Map. This classification promotes lower density residential (less than 8 du/ac) and associated civic and commercial services. The proposed conditional RMF-L (Residential Multi -Family Low Density) district would be limited to a maximum of 521 units (7.2 du/ac) and thus consistent with the density recommendation of the General Residential place type. The proposed multi -family structures are located along Holly Shelter Road, closer to areas classified as Community Mixed Use. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? With the adoption of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, the subject site was classified as General Residential which promotes residential development not to exceed 8 du/ac. In addition, New Hanover County has approved plans to extend utility services down Holly Shelter Road in order to support future development of the corridor. 1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T❑ N, N C 2 6 40 3 P H ( 9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 22 PARAMOUNTE E N G I " E E fZ I N G, 1 N C. Community Meeting Report Proposed Conditional Rezoning by Stout Operating Firm, LLC New Hanover County Parcels R01 100-008-01 1-002 & R01 100-008-010-000 (Approx. 72.4 acres located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road) Notice of the meeting was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels as listed on the New Hanover County tax records. The meeting was held on Thursday, March 9Th from 6:00-7:00pm at Spiffy On -Demand Car Care, 5656 Barbados Blvd. #160, Castle Hayne, NC 28429. The following items are attached: 1. A list of the adjacent property owners to whom written notice was mailed; and 2. A copy of the written notice. On behalf of the applicant, representatives from Stout Operating Firm, LLC (Now Olympus Holding Company Castle Hayne, LLC) and Paramounte Engineering, Inc. were in attendance. No one from the public attended the meeting, therefore no questions or concerns regarding the proposal were discussed. During a site visit by Paramounte Engineering, we were approached by a neighbor asking about the development. This gentleman lives in the adjacent neighborhood along Blue Clay Road, but outside of the 500' notification distance. After discussing the project with him, he stated he had no issue with the development and was happy water and sewer were getting extended closer to his home. He hopes to tie into CFPUA water when available. He understands this project will not bring services to his home, but we did discuss his options option for extension if Blue Clay Road is the location of water line extension or his other option of contacting CFPUA for the County's infrastructure extension along Holly Shelter Road. No changes were made to the proposal as the result of this meeting or the site meeting with the neighbor. 1 2 2 C I N E M A ❑ R I V E, W I L M I N G T ❑ N, N C 2 8 4 ❑ 3 P H ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 ❑ 7 F A X: ( 9 1 ❑) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 ❑ Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 23 PARA MOUND P E E N G I N E E FZ I N G. I N C February 22, 2023 RE: Community Meeting for a Conditional Rezoning Proposed on the Corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road Paramounte Engineering, Inc. and Stout Operating Firm, LLC invite you to a community meeting regarding a proposed conditional rezoning for + 72.41 acre residential development located on the corner of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road. The subject property is further identified as New Hanover County Parcels R01100-008-011-002 and R01100-008-010-000. As part of this rezoning process and prior to submitting our plans to New Hanover County Planning, we are reaching out to neighbors to inform them about our project. You are receiving this invitation because New Hanover County GIS records indicate you own property within 500 feet of the subject property. Please reference the enclosed site plan for a first look at our project, and you are welcome to attend our meeting to review larger plans. Our open -house style meeting will be held Thursday, March 9, 2023, at a nearby business, Spiffy On -Demand Car Care. Drop in any time between 6:30-7:30 PM. We will have full-size plans and members of the project team available to discuss our plans and answer your questions. If anyone is unavailable to attend the meeting at the designated day and time but wants to discuss the project, please contact our office at the phone number listed in the footer below. A few key facts about the site and proposed project: The subject property is undeveloped land located at the intersection of Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road. The site is across Blue Clay Road from S&W Ready Mix Concrete and across Holly Shelter Road from Adams Products Oldcastle. The subject property's Blue Clay Road frontage runs + 330' south of Berwick Drive. The land proposed for conditional rezoning is currently zoned Residential 15 (R-15) for the road frontage along Blue Clay Road and Light Industrial (I-1) for the majority of the + 72 acre site. We are requesting a conditional rezoning to downzone the property from Industrial to Residential Multi -Family Low Density (RMF-L) to allow a range of residential product types including apartments near the Holly Shelter intersection and single family homes, duplexes, and townhomes for the remainder of the site. We look forward to meeting you on March 9' and to sharing project details with you. Community Meeting Time, Date, and Location: Open House from 6:30 — 7:30 PM on Thursday, March 91h Spiffy On -Demand Car Care 5656 Barbados Blvd. # 160, Castle Hayne, NC 28429 122 CINEMA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Board of CoPW (glib r7difs6-7XJ g u st 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 24 Site Data Total Overall Site Acreage: +72.41 Ac. Current Zoning: R-15 & 1.1 Proposed Zoning /Allowable Density: RMF-l- (10 duac) Proposed Density: Phase 1: Apartment Parcel (+ 24.00 AC): 10.0 duac / 240 units Phase 2: Cottage Parcel (+ 48.41 AC): 5.95 duac / 288 units Total Proposed Units: 528 Units 240 Apartments 288 Cottages J WO ALL PAWlWI Pr4z PI aJP.Of .__ ALaWIIbF(a11xWLPROJE✓'jGWVGS �L G Prepared by:H PARAMOUNTE ss Pcea" 13Lue OLA.Y s'l"AP TI kaA7Kesil2eNCAL N=eA Izza�onre vnmg,w. Nmm cwime zsao3 1 (910)'191d]m (0) (910)]91-6]d0 (F, NC Wanuk: G2816 Date: 20 February 2023 1'=100'Att 24 xW \/scaalll. , NOM 0' 50' 100' 200' Preliminary / Not For Con,V,Oion -This site plan is a graphic representation and ahauld be W fted for di —salon purpose. only This site plan approximates existing condaiona relating to structure. —nds, roads, palling, vegetation and property boundaries. Plan components may change based upon regulatory and municipal regulation and requirements at the M1me of approvals and or development—iry. I "T"h 1 r . sra�nVarew -� POMP 1--� Na F SEGONVAIzcfYAlltl 5 PaIN LLY sNeLTeY A PAFI41Nq b-a STOW, 4-LNrTAPAIa1a0WWlLl7NGt 'Peaty a l�N� / Au r�NTe7 sPor� vCo,OTA11VG OVeFVtz, TM. x 1 $ 1 � � N J 0 PAk1�iNGl 0 1 1 °r,w AL�Nt>tzIVENAYS AIdNGt bLU6 CLAY ko6i�; SvjE AGGBEf.� To APAk�MeNTs F7�la 9LU6 CLAY IzaA7 Conceptual Land Plan Blue Clay Tract New Hanover County, North Carolina Blue Clay Tract Adjacent Property Owners OWNER NAME OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE CARTER CAROL 110 BERWICK DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 JENKINS RUTH M 303 E MCCLURE CIR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 POPE META MARIE 110 BLACKWATER DR WATHA NC 28478 DEAL MARK A 5800 BLUDE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MURRELL CANDACE 10 DONAMAR LN SOUTH AMBOY NJ 8879 MEARES DEWEY EUGENE ETAL PO BOX 377 ROCKY POINT NC 28457 ANDERSON JONATHON A 5812 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MILLER DUSTIN A 5808 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 STEWART RANDY C 5804 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BAILON PABLO JANETTE HERNANDEZ 6509 GREENVILLE LOOP RD LT 176 WILMINGTON NC 28409 SCHUTT GEORGE PO BOX 12013 WILMINGTON NC 28405 SIDBURY LAND & TIMBER LLC PO BOX 3649 WILMINGTON NC 28406 S & W READY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC 5700 LAKE WRIGHT DR SUITE 300 NORFOLK VA 23502 MILLIS DONALD GLENDON 5612 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMIREZ FLORES EULOGIO ET UX 567 WINDING CREEK RD ROCKY POINT NC 28457 ELEMENTIS CHROMIUM ACQUISITION 5408 HOLLY SHELTER RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RUIZ LUZ 5604 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RUIZ LUZ 5604 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RANSOM DANIEL W LAURA L 208 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CAMPBELL JOSHUA 104 BERWICK DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VANN LORRIE 6101 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VANN LORRIE 6101 ORANGE ST CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 MABRY OFTENE ETAL 219 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HAND PAULA RENEE ETAL 104 PINE HOLLOW DR ROCKY POINT NC 28457 BMC ENTERPRISES PO BOX 312 HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 BETTENCOURT LISA K 189 BELL HAMMOND FORREST DR ROCKY POINT NC 28457 BMC ENTERPRISES PO BOX 312 HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 THOMPSON RUBY W 3836JAMES B WHITE HWY WHITEVILLE NC 28472 MURRELL CANDACE 10 DONMAR LN SOUTH AMBOY NJ 8879 GRIZZLE GEORGE D 5728 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 ROBBINS SIGLEY CARRIE S PO BOX 267 CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 VEREEN WILLIAM C ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMSEY ORAL D JOANNE 9 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BRITT LLOYD R 203 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 STRICKLAND CHARLES II ftgggACommissioners -Ap GR:EMR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 26 1 TODD THOMAS L JR 5524 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 USA PO BOX 20636 ATLANTA GA 30320 SHEPARD MICHAEL R 5533 BLE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HADGRAFT ROGER S LISA M 3301 AMMONS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 LEBLANC MICHELE 5509 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CAMERON COMPANY TIMBER LLC PO BOX 3649 WILMINGTON NC 28406 BERMAN JOHN J ETAL 3717 SAINT JOHNS CT UNIT B WILMINGTON NC 28403 OLDCASTLE APG SOUTH INC 333 N GREENE STREET SUITE 500 GREENSBORO NC 27401 TWO TEN INVESTORS INC PO BOC 1108 CLINTON NC 28329 MAZARIEGOS-PEREZ ENWELVER ET UX 6509 GREENVILLE LOOP RD LT 176 WILMINGTON NC 28409 JIMENEZ HERNANDEZ HUGO A ET UX 5704 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 AXTELL MICHAEL C MARY L 1536 COUNTRY CLUB DR HAMPSTEAD NC 28443 MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES PO BOX 8040 FORT WAYNE IN 46898 NORTHERN FRANCIS E VERA E 7501 ELKMONT CT WILMINGTON NC 28411 GANON JOHN D JANET G 107 HIGH TIDE DR WILMINGTON NC 28411 BOYD DONNA 8 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 DIXON EBBO B HEIRS 1855 LOGANBERRY RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 MORALES WALTER X JEESE KA 2474 OLD OCEAN HWY BOLIVIA NC 28422 DIAZ HUGO C ETAL 7418 POWDER KEG CT WILMINGTON NC 28411 BOYD DONNA D ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 RAMOS NORMA S 2755 NEW RD BURGAW NC 28425 MORALES WALTER X JEESEKA 2474 OLD OCEAN HWY BOLIVIA NC 28422 FRANCO WIMPER A MARIA 1 222 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 LLANEZA ROBERT R MARIE W 5811 FALLEN TREE WILMINGTON NC 28405 GRIZZLE GEORGE 5724 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CROUSE NORMA JEAN 5716 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BOYD DONNA D ETAL 220 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BERMAN PHILIP B ETAL 3717 SAINT JOHNS CT UNIT B WILMINGTON NC 28403 USA PO BOX 20636 ATLANTA GA 30320 RAY DANIEL HRS 6 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 HAYES RICHARD M JESSICA M 3 KERRY DR CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 BOYD HERCHEL L DONNA S 8 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 CARABALLO BRUNILDA 5 MCGREGOR RD CASTLE HAYNE NC 28429 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 27 1 THE,. OASIS HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD NEW HANOV R COUNTY, NORTH CARO INA CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLAN NOTICE REQUIRED ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PHYSICALLY LOCATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF SAID UTILITIES. CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY OPERATORS WHO MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES IN THE AREA OF PROPOSED EXCAVATION AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION. CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTACT OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROVIDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL OSHA 1910.333 MINIMUM APPROACH DISTANCE TO ENERGIZED POWERLINES AND OSH 29 CFR 1926.1407-1411 MUST BE FOLLOWED. CONTACT THESE UTILITIES NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PH: 910-798-7165 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ATTN: CARL PAQUET PH: 910-350-2242 EMERGENCY DIAL 911 POLICE - FIRE - RESCUE Know what's below. Call before you dig. CFPUA (WATER & SEWER) PH: 910-332-6550 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS GENERAL PH: 1-800-452-2777 AT&T ATTN:STEVE DAYVAULT PH: 910-341-7664 SPECTRUM GENERAL PH: 800-892-4357 MAY 2023 APPLICANT: OLYMPUS HOLDING COMPANY CASTLE HAYNE, LLC 4 PERCY STREET CHARLESTON, SC 29403 ��o CAST�ENgYNF�,O 40 0 r = M a � ITS o c � 0 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH THE OASIS CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLAN PROJECT # 22208.PE PROPERTY OWNER: BLUE TANK, LLC HOLLY TANK, LLC 24 BACKFIN POINT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MAY 1, 2023 APPLICANT: OLYMPUS HOLDING COMPANY CASTLE HAYNE, LLC 4 PERCY STREET CHARLESTON, SC 29403 PROJECT CONSULTANTS ENGINEER/ LAND PLANNER/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CI IR\/Fv(1R PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC. PARAMOUNTE ENGINEERING, INC. 122 CINEMA DRIVE 122 CINEMA DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 CIVIL: ROB BALLAND, PE (910-791-6707) JOSH TAYLOR, PLS (910-791-6707) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ALLISON ENGEBRETSON, RLA (910-791-6707) SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C-0.0 COVER SHEET EX-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS CRZ-1 CONDITIONAL REZONING SITE PLAN PREPARED BY: PARAMOUNTE E N G I N E E F, I N G, I N C. 122 Cinema Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 (910) 791-6707 (0) (910) 791-6760 (F) NC License #: C-2846 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 8 - 1 SITE INFORMATION PROJECT ADDRESSES: 5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; 5735 BLUE CLAY RD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 PROPERTY OWNER: HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24 BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: ± 72.39 ACRES co CURRENT ZONING: 1-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) 00 CURRENT USE: UNUSED LAND -Q 0 FLOOD INFORMATION: THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X- MINIMAL FLOOD RISK - AS SHOWN BY FEMA MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. ci WETLAND INFORMATION: A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING RECEIVED APPROVED BY THE USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES 00(-n( 1. THE SITE IS HEAVILY WOODED WITH A MIXTURE OF VEGETATION AS NOTED THIS SHEET, BUT NO -Q SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE IN SITE REVIEW PERFORMED 4/28/23. W 2. 2' CONTOURS SOURCED FROM NEW HANOVER COUNTY GIS DATA; FULL PROPERTY TREE & U1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY UNDERWAY. 3. THIS LOT IS SUBJECT TO ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD LEGEND Z 0 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE -0 C N O — — ADJOINING PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE m z , 2 m — — RIGHT OF WAY Zjj z O ZJ mG)oz -30- - CONTOUR c/) 71 0-1 00 — — — — — — POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND WATERS OF THE US LINE z fUl ET ET ET 404 WETLAND , O 1 / IG I \ 00 \ f ' EXISTING VEGETATION: WAX MYRTLE AND INKBERRY UNDERSTORY, PRIMARILY / OPEN ABOVE 6' HT. WITH SPORADIC 10" -14" LOBLOLLY / PINES; -------------- co EXIS WETLANDS,\ 4�1 ± 0.12 AC I O � / I 1 \ \ EXISTING VEGETATION: \\\ WAX MYRTLE AND INKBERRY THICKET WITH MIX OF 1" - 16" .I LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; I ��-- / I / I \ �I Q co I `GP I I v O C>� Iv 5Gj� I . NO v I 4-77 THE UNIT \ I EXISTING TREELINE, TYP. ED I __ _ v PARID, RD oO Es OF AME \\\\ I v D B. 008_0� RICA Z� 50, PG. 158Cb 0�001 _ / I f' I EXISTING PROPERTY LINE // �,'' �00 EXISTING VEGETATION: 5" - 16' LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; I I \ 1 v Z SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM, SOUTHERN . I j j \\ 1 I C) I MAGNOLIAS & RED MAPLES \\ I Qjv I / � D I- W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1 \\ ,' I o I r m r SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA 11 \\ I -----------/ ,� D M EXISTING VEGETATION: I\ O 1 V I 4" - 7" SWEETGUM, WATER OAKS, & // Z \ , = 1 Cb ,' LOBLOLLY PINE; (� O CN o C) SPORADIC 2"-6" RED MAPLE & WATER OAKS "�' F--� cn O --10 W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" R l • • ZO _ -3" PINES & OAKS D z O D \ \ / 0 n O Z D— O O(cn FT'I ,71 C) 6 Ji 1,670' RADIUS LIMIT OF FAA HEIGHT v \ RESTRICTION FOR STRUCTURES 1--I XISTINGa--_\' /� _ \\ \` LOCATED ADJACENT TO EXISTING / --- _ 1 ar FAAS VOR TOWER; STRUCTURE v ETLAN /i�M/ g2� 3M 9m HEIGHT ALLOWED: 55' MAX.; FAA + 2 7 C 13'O A APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR M STRUCTURES PRIOR TO r y' N Oo �' CONSTRUCTION v BLUE TANK LLC �� 1 \\\ o � / / �, // � / / \ \ I �� \ EXISTING VEGETATION: I N I , , 4" - 7" SWEETGUM & LOBLOLLY PINE; vPARID: R01100-008-010-000 SPORADIC 2"-8" WATER OAKS v O `. I OCCASIONAL 10-12" LOBLOLLY PINE — — - \ / / / EXISTING VEGETATION: W/ UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" -3" j D.B. 6225, P G . 1478 j w j �v 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY &POND PINE; j IV �> SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA \ I SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM & SOUTHERN `� ��' , / / \ v 2 151 009 S.F. ± I ; y� / MAGNOLIAS ; - , S�' IV / v r > > I I , - c \ Z 1\ + I � , � W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & ��\ I � 49.38 AC. '' \I N �V j SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA j _ 0 C6ti Io HOLLY TANK LLC v m o n c/� EXISTING VEGETATION: ` \\ I j w -I /' 1 \\ 11 'r I I � � OAK ISWEETBAY MAGNOLIA & M XYOF MIX OF 1ER4 1 ml 111 \ I II ``-' N PARID : R01100-008-011-002 z 0 C)m O UNDERSTORY OF WAX I \ RED MAPLES --.� j 1 --- -_J/ 00D.B. 6225, PG. 1482 v � z o D U \ WITH SPORADIC 8" -16" LOBLOLLY &POND PINE\\ / \\\ \1 \ ,/ �\\ / / z , , , 1,0027179 S.F. C G' 23.01 AC. ± jl v O N N O C) EXISTING VEGETATION: \ \ �\ \\ �\ /' j \ m C) Z 1� 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; �� \\ \\ram \ \ \ \ i I G C) SPORADIC 2" -12" WATER OAKS, SWEETGUMS & \ \\ \\ \\ \\ / , `� v I SOUTHERN MAGNOLIAS ^O ?j OCCASIONAL LARGE 20"-23" LOBLOLLY PINE j 1 \ \ I EXISTING VEGETATION: m v J ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD ROW EXISTING VEGETATION: I 8" - 12" LOBLOLLY PINE; r V /� �� W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & 1" -3" I \ 1 \ / 5" - 16" LOBLOLLY & POND PINE; SPORADIC 3" -8" SWEETGUM &RED MAPLE ^- I O -�j \ I \ 1 \ / CLUSTERS ' V Q /� SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA \ \ SPORADIC 2" -5" SWEETGUM & SOUTHERN I / q OCCASIONAL 10-12" LOBLOLLY PINE , \ --\ v \ \ \� `� \ \ \ \ ----- MAGNOLIAS .� \ G> ,G�� V O \a �� - \\ \ \\ /' OCCASIONAL LARGE 20"-23" LOBLOLLY PINE ALONG W/ UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & \ (b� O\ O �C ^ ^ \ ET / / SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA \ O `. I �, BLUE CLAY ROAD ROW W/ THICK UNDERSTORY OF WAX MYRTLE & \y Gj\ � C -�i \ �V O� a -- -----' ,i it 1f �\ SPORADIC 1" -3" SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA \ .w C OQO �i� �,�QQ,`'� �'�� o'�'Q� �1 ROADSIDE DITCH w RO DE H B Y ODD - S.R. 1318 � Q c .� \� ,�9'S5Z 5, OZ ,0 •959 „� �,L OZ S O o�ow�'l'(� / o= 60' PUBLIC R/W — — — — 00 ��j�;�,�40�'V / �C N r D D D m n y m U y D m D D D m IVIlN3aIS32i 3Sfl 4NVl D D �_ r 1NV�d IVOIW3HO 3Sf1 aNVI I �\y O Oo �/� D �x — o z o� Z o z 0(n z o z op Z-I JNINOZ O ti !?> D j r z o� z �— z 0 z 00 z �� m 5t-2i JNINOZ ,4, ,�� O o N m z p m y C� p x p 0 c p c p c p 0 0 p O _ O/ D Z r � O N X O N I N — N�� I C N o X I c N o I 000-�00-600-96t 602i ald N m N i— o � m I.00-ZOO-Z00-00UM :0id p0 �O W ;] r �m I �]r I z 0 IcNoc I C o r� -� � r D N CNo c D �0�� �O�z I�O�N �p�N I �0�� (n0;m m��m VMVNIV30 �0�� CcnO�r C0o� p�oQ) t� ~/ D �m z o= I (n0�� I cNoN ImzNm I mzNM IMZpoN mZNr mzNm I m?,r I.. ,� mz—D mzm (nz-0 O��ANVdWOO=1 JONOOXIINMIV321M'8S �A O N Z c0 c •- mZN— Inp �� �r �m �r Zrnr zrnm �� � I !?�—�z rn �0 �m —Z z Zw Zwm Zw Zwr Zrn Zo, Zoe O cN;U zw2 M J'j0 �0 0 Z70 � oo �0 � 0 ;0 ,non mG)o� I � � � �0 0 � W � A- ^ (� I /\I c (n (n z m +n O> .. Z w O X (n O O '' O m .. .. 0 D U) .. D L N G� CD o O D L m.. O m. o 00 0 m o OD m.. � m.. Oc m.. 0 _� �pNm mZ jD �.. o� yGOo�J (n�w� ��woo ��w0 -�w0 ��wz D�Nz ���D ���� - -.1. 00 V\ ��mz�� �zwZ caw n•• 00 0;o> m�C)= m'o� mc�o� m��� mcno� m�oD 0 CD m�oz 0�o> I--1 O �zwm m�oc m�,00n D�wm zcs'25` Zcno�m zc"c�aG) ZU'om Zcnoy z ND z �� L zcno ZU'N mono I = ti m�?ON (n om z �� Zoom m m --A n CS om D z _ Om �c,,wN D �cno� ooD o0(n o oo� om D om D O oon oo 00 (� o z 0 c o C D oo D o m O z o o o D o r o r O D O D O Dr O D ../ mc„o� z M r z CD(n Z co m � 6 0 r C O O r om D oD Cj m m X I — — — — — 880bN I 1 X SCALE: 1 "=100' 0 50 100 200 300 400 ^P� rri z 0 w V W w � v N � r71 7 F� H � � O O 0 O LL z z Z J U W0. L Z00 - O� 0 O � 0 N oO Z .� p � N Q 4-4o U O E W a� 4-4 00 UZr W N 1~ o� Z U Z A W o C� O U� �O O O� H � O W N o ' of Q Z o u 0 0� Q <» z 00 o 0 Z F- U Q Q 0 — U <of(DLL D< w w> w g 0 Z_ o > Z Z> Y O U J J W D- L)a1Ir > Q Li J > U 0(n000 SEAL EX- 1 PEI JOB#: 22208.PE Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 8 - 2 F p`FzM RQ �C��cl cn 0 W c 0 CgST`Fyq VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE W) NORTH TOWNHOUSE BLDG, TYP. SITE DATA ' PROJECT ADDRESSES: 5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; I 5735 BLUE CLAY RD t CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 I I PROPERTY OWNER: HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) -- R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) I P ASE 3 ' PROPOSED USE: MIXED RESIDENTIAL P ASE 4 FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: GENERAL RESIDENTIAL I TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: ± 72.39 ACRES , MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ± 24.32 ACRES TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX. ± 48.09 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: 1-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) I PROPOSED ZONING: RMF-L VOR 1,670' RADIUS; 55HEIGHT LIMITATION FOR MAX DENSITY ALLOWED IN RMF-L: 10 DU / AC (724 UNITS) BUILDINGS WITHIN THIS AREA; w MAX PROJECT DENSITY PROPOSED: 7.20 DU / AC FAA APPROVAL REQUIRED ' I TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS: 521 UNITS Im MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS: 243UNITS , TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX. 278 UNITS w lal RMF-L PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONAL DATA od MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED Y I MIN. LOT AREA: 20,000 SF ± 1, 059, 379 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH: 100, EXCEEDS 100' �a w FRONT SETBACK 35' 50' MIN. o ) I J 13M - SIDE SETBACK (STREET): 30' 60' MIN. o N p ILL ' SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR): 25' (3 STORIES) 40' MIN. c6 ' c w REAR SETBACK: 30' (3 STORIES) 35' MIN. Z o Iw BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 3 STORIES (W/O ADD REGS.) 3 STORIES MAX. BUILDING SEPARATION 20' 20' MIN. a N° IQw I o z � a Q OTHER MIXED RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED" IN I MIN. LOT AREA: 5, 000-17, 500 SF ± 2,094,800 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH: 50' EXCEEDS 50' FRONT SETBACK 20' 20' MIN. I I SIDE SETBACK (STREET): 10, 10' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR): 5' 5' MIN. I REAR SETBACK: 15' 15' MIN. I BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 3 STORIES MAX 2 STORIES FOR MAJORITY W/POTENTIAL FOR 3 STORIES MIXED IN I I AWAY FROM BLUE CLAY RD. BUILDING SEPARATION 20' 20' MIN. I ' *NOTE: SETBACKS LISTED AS MINIMUMS APPLY IF ANY LOTS ARE CREATED DURING PLATTING; AS DRAWN THIS PLAN, I ALL BUILDINGS FAR EXCEED MINIMUM SETBACKS BECAUSE NO LOTS ARE SHOWN. I SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: PHASING I I 1. THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN MULTIPLE PHASES, 4 ANTICIPATED I LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES I 1. STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD IN I ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5.4.6 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO I 2. BUFFERYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (SOUTHERN & EASTERN ' PROPERTY LINE) WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS I I OF SECTION 5.4.3 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 3. ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LIDO. SIDEWALKS 1. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.3.3.J.f OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY LIDO I I STORMWATER & UTILITIES 1. STORM WATER SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NEW HANOVER COUNTY AND ORMWATER STATE REQUIREMENTS. PONDS SHOWN IN GENERAL LOCATION AT THIS TIME, BUT DESIGN WILL I I POND ALTER AS ENGINEERING DESIGN PROGRESSES. ' 2. PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE SITE. ALL DESIGN AND PERMITTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CFPUA, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, AND STATE I REGULATORS AS REQUIRED. I \ OPEN SPACE MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS: \ REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 4.86 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: ± 10.40 AC \ R 7 REMAINING MIXED RESIDENTIAL: \\\ �S�p �% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 9.62 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: ± 20.43 AC OPEN SPACE INCLUDES AMENITIES, WETLANDS, BUFFERS, STREETYARDS, PONDS & EASEMENTS 41 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES: FLOOD INFORMATION: THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X - MINIMAL FLOOD RISK - AS SHOWN BY FEMA e`er p Jv ooy MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. �J�^'6.�i`'� WETLAND: INFORMATION: A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION AS PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED BY THE ^3 a USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 "y °°� �^y��� ,' \ SPECIMEN TREES: NO SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE. CONDITIONAL REZONING NOTE �„Q\o�tiooJe ALL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN CONVEY THE GENERAL INTENTION OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND MAXIMUM DENSITY ANTICIPATED; DESIGN MAY REQUIRE MINOR DEVIATIONS DURING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALL DESIGN WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF APPROVAL FOR THE CONDITIONAL ZONING PLAN AND WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY'S UDO. UDO SECTION 10.3.3.C.7.b FURTHER IDENTIFIES EXTENT OF CHANGE ALLOWED BEFORE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BOARD REVIEW. PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY TRC AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. EXISTING R-15 CORRIDOR ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD; NO BUILDINGS PROPOSED WITHIN R-15 AREA TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFER TO EXISTING HOMES ALONG BLUE CLAY RD. 18, 24' 18' 0.5' PARKING SPACE DRIVE AISLE PARKING SPACE 0.5' 1.5' UTILITY AND ACCESS EASMENT 1.5' PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT SLOPES= 3:1 2"-S9.5C SURFACE 6.5' SIDEWALK 6"-ABC BASE 6" ABC UNDER CURBING ✓ARIES -SEE PLAN 24" VERTICAL CURB PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. APARTMENT PRIVATE DRIVE WITH PARKING CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE \ _ r R \ p/0. R 14F 6 FONNGoB O 0'T0R (/qOq1�7 007 ENO --� OPEN SPACE \ \ I1��l1�■MAIL STORMWATER POND ROAD C ROAD D - INS 20' FRONT SETBACK= VARIES 1' TRAVELWAY PARKING STALL 1' 5' LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE 1' 1' SLOP SLOPE PROPOSED PHASE LINE 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1.80% SLOPE f- POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND SLOPES= 3:1 2"-S9.5B SURFACE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WATERS OF THE US LINE 6.5' SIDEWALK 6"- ABC BASE -7 VARIES - SEE PLAN MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB 6" STONE UNDER CURBING ZONING DIVISION LINE PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE W PROPOSED WATER LINE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. AMENITY PARKING CROSS SECTION FM PROPOSED FORCEMAIN TOWNHOME NOT TO SCALE TOWNHOME WETLANDS i3 i3 i3 DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY VARIES 1 24' 1 5' VARIES PROPOSED BUILDINGS 18' MIN. 1 1, 18' MIN. 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT �, PROPOSED SIDEWALKS / SLOPES= 3:1 1 1 1 -� SLOPES= 3:1 / CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE 5' WIDTH -SEE PLAN / MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB FOR LOCATION 6"-B25.0B BASE 6" STONE UNDER CURBING TYPICAL TOWNHOME WITH DRIVEWAY ROAD / CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. EXISTING DITCH; POTENTIAL_ - NON -WETLAND -WATERS OF _ - - - - T4E US,-rYP. / -LOOP C Iir_ OPEN I ° MAIN APARTMENT ACCESS -{- STORMWATER II POND ash r--- _ SPACE S, ROADOPEN\ PACE I PUMP ' TATION AFT _J I 1 t_- I I� II I \ PACE OPEN CIO `-- lNgSE 3 SPACE y� I 1 a (nQ'Q I 1 O I = _� / Hqs I I o \ CL (L \ APARTMENT I� I U CLUBHOUSE, O OPEN SPACE I , I Q I j 0 AMENITY & � Fp STORMWATER LEASING OFFICE O Z.POND ` \ I , I o ' // � / I L � � I , w I I .. � • w,\LO I I ►� I o OP [3 I I X _ - �/ ---{ 0 OPEN STORMWATER POND 10'x70' SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. J LLJ / J O J O Q O J O Q O a O J Z N W F J Q Z 00 F W O F O / W m Z w W F p co z U��p woin W ��Z dr�OfQ Qo�O �Mw- W ou,Z =R�o ���w 00 Z p W'Q ZXOLL, W QDQ�p O W <9bLU O O U �4b W'O Oob W CDMd'- o O W per(/! (7o w 0 No U�' W LLJ , W Mw LLJ_NZUj U IL Z2 ZMZ� ca K W th ZK Z� Llj W aOU' Cr 0 �0°D N W �0U) H N D U) 0U) D N D W NZ W 0� N0 W N o 0 Co a 0 U oND N N Z W LLl D7 U p W p Z p O p Z o O W N �� p p ; W= O D H a < U z U 0 z a X O Z U O Z 02 o Z �a J pa J a 4 I I TREE LINE REPRESENTS AREA INTENDED TO PRESERVE & AUGMENT, WHEN NEEDED, EXISTING VEGETATION AS BUFFER, TYP. / SPACE -- r '--'' w P�NPS�2�3 vv Iy� II I O- P \ OPEN SPACE u �i 13 I m I Z �I rn co ca J U �I Y� D�LU m/ Q I v mo =� F� col 0) w I O oQ �� mow/ ww J OPEN PACE I I I I \ OPEN SPACE I 2 / - - / D � m � 1 /I I o° _ O -i W I c: o J � 1- I I / . N W LOOP C A z 0- 0 A y OPEN - TRASH / �O I vz, g ?�T� � 1 / I PACT OR `" zh�1 SPACE m rW ILU I OPEN BUILDING 4 � QII I SPACE TORMWATER I I LL X / I I I POND I 1 1 ZONING -p IF_ Y R-15 ZONING I I I I - I TREE LINE II I °z I -I 30' SIDE STREET MULTI -FAMILY SETBACK- _ _VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER / _ STREET YARD, TYP. BLUE CLAY ROAD 55' PUBLIC ROW - - p o F O J U Z V o F J W Q -z ,0. Z� L gUJ o(�D QFaW0 pwD w(jwo U wD U. W Z W N Z WNZ WoZ Z W ZO�W NN of O� N Z �O NAD 0a z 2a J 2a z O p as J J L- AMENITY / LEASING OFFICE AND POOL - r � DEAL MARK A I y z zz PID: R01116-001-004-000 p N z q 3 O m 7J (/1 O ZONING:R-15 mz,z A - (nZ N �1 I NOON LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL A z m m z m m z Z m�oA mA�z MZrnA OOD �Zrn cn - m�,oO V';12� ��o- -p z w< o0 mvoZ m�1oZ o� Z x z oD 60 o oz I> D o D S & W R ADY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC I PID: R01200-002-002-001 ZONING: I-2 AND USE: CHEMICAL PLANT SECONDARY APARTMENT AC E S �{ 3-STORY, 27-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. �..I 0 100, 200' 300' N O R T H SCALE: 1"=100' �--I V) Z O W U w w v N � � O O 0 O LL � z W Z z J o d- U U W0- L Z o� 00 � � 0 N 00 Z O ct E W 4 ^ N cn 00 UZ� � o� Z U 0 Z A W o O 1� �+ T�� r'r'I O H 0 O�,,xw0 cob LU LU 1`! C) Z 9 11a-a O o� H < �5 z 0 0} O O LL F- Qa 0 Z - U < of (DLL �azno w g ow Z_ 0 o > Z Z Y J O U J W a_ L)aEly Q W J 0�: U 0 0(/)000 SEAL CRZ-1 PEI JOB#: 22208.PE Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 8 - 3 WMPO April 12, 2023 Mr. Jonathan Guy, PE, PTOE, AICP Kimley Horn Associates 115 Fairchild Street, Suite 250 Charleston, SC 29492 305 Chestnut Street Po Box 1810 Wilmington, NC 28402 Ph: (910) 341-3258 Fax; (910) 341-7801 www.wmpo.org RE: Approval with conditions of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed Castle Hayne Residential development located in New Hanover County, NC. Dear Mr. Guy: The WMPO, NCDOT and New Hanover County staffs have reviewed the Blue Clay Residential TIA (sealed February 16, 2023) and based on the information provided and conversations held to date, it is our understanding that the proposed development has a build out year of 2026 and will consist of: o ITE Land Use Code 210 — Single Family detached housing 57 DU o ITE Land Use Code 215 — Single Family attached housing (duplexes) 231 DU o ITE Land Use Code 221 — Multi -family (mid -rise) housing 240 DU Based upon the review of the analysis provided, the following improvements are required of this development: 1-40 Eastbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) (Stop -controlled intersection) Signalize the intersection. 1-40 Westbound Ramp and SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) (Stop -controlled intersection) Option 1 (Recommended) Signalize the intersection and provide necessary coordination. Option 2 Construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on 1-40 westbound ramps, with 400 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration, and taper. Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization City of Wilmington e Town of Carolina Beach • Town of Kure Beach • Town of Wrightsville Beach County of New Hanover • TonBMRpb#l�b?nTjj%§i@fiL&D9ka Nr7pkdLk9assa ■ County of Brunswick County of Pender • Cape Fear Public TransportatjgTE&.tbo.6W_� orth Carolina Department of Transportation Approval with conditions of the Castle Hayne Residential (New Hanover County) Traffic Impact Analysis SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) (Stop -controlled intersection) • Construct an eastbound right turn lane on SR 7002 (Holly Shelter Road) with 700 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. • Construct an exclusive northbound right turn lane on SR 2787 (Blue Clay Road) with 700 feet of storage, appropriate deceleration and taper. SR 2181 (Dairy Farm Road) and SR 1336 (Sidbury Road) (Stop -controlled intersection) • No improvements are required. SR 1002 (Holly Shelter Road) and Site Access 1 (Proposed stop -controlled intersection) • Construct an eastbound right turn taper of 200 feet on SR 7002 (Holly Shelter Road). • Construct site access (northbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for northbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Concrete Plant Driveway/Site Access 2 (Stop -controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Kerry Drive/Site Access 3 (Stop -controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 50 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. SR 2181 (Blue Clay Road) and Site Access 4 (Proposed stop -controlled intersection) • Construct site access (eastbound approach) with an internal protected stem of 75 feet measured from the right-of-way, and with one ingress lane and one egress lane. • Provide stop controls for eastbound approach. If changes are made to the proposed site driveways and/or land uses, the current trip distribution may need to be modified and would require a revised Traffic Impact Analysis to be submitted for review by the NCDOT, WMPO, and New Hanover County, in which instance this approval would become null and void. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable New Hanover County and NCDOT permits for access to the road network. A copy of this TIA approval shall be included with any NCDOT driveway permit application. All applicable NCDOT and New Hanover County technical standards and policies shall apply. Board of Com ero�A 3August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 9 - 2 Approval with conditions of the Castle Hayne Residential (New Hanover County) Traffic Impact Analysis Please feel free to contact me at (910) 473 — 5130 if you have any questions regarding this approval. Sincerely, Scott A. James, PE Transportation Planning Engineer Wilmington Urban Area MPO Ec: Ben Hughes, PE, District Engineer, NCDOT Jon Roan, Deputy District Engineer, NCDOT Frank Mike, Assistant District Engineer, NCDOT Jessi Leonard, PE, Assistant Division Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT Stonewall Mathis, PE, Deputy Division Traffic Engineer, NCDOT Krupa Koilada, Senior Assistant Traffic Engineer, NCDOT Bryce Cox, Assistant Traffic Engineer, NCDOT Robert Farrell, Senior Planner, New Hanover County Julian Griffee, Current Planner, New Hanover County Jamar Johnson, El, Engineering Associate, WMPO Page 3of3 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 9 - 3 Castle Hayne Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis Executive Summary The proposed Castle Hayne Residential Development is located in Castle Hayne, NC along Holly Shelter Road and Blue Clay Road within a currently vacant parcel of land. This parcel of land is bound by Holly Shelter Road to the north, single-family residences to the south, Blue Clay Road to the east, and vacant land to the west. Based on the current site plan, the proposed development is anticipated to consist of approximately 57 detached houses, 231 duplexes, and 240 apartment units to be constructed and occupied by the end of 2026. New trips generated by the development are expected to utilize one driveway along Holly Shelter Road and three driveways along Blue Clay Road for access to the surrounding roadway network. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates traffic operations under 2022 Existing, 2026 No -Build, and 2026 Build conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following study intersections: 1. Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 EB Ramps 2. Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 WB Ramps 3. Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road 4. Sidbury Road at Dairy Farm Road 5. Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 6. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant 7. Blue Clay at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive 8. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 The TIA scoping document associated with this project was initially reviewed and approved by the Wilmington Urban Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) on October 26, 2022 and revised on January 12, 2023. The revised TIA scoping document is included in Appendix B for reference. Kimley-Horn was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development and identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate these impacts in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Congestion Management Capacity Analysis Guidelines, NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways, and WMPO Traffic Impact Analysis Supplemental Guidelines. Based on capacity analysis results, the following recommendations are offered: Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 EB Ramps • Place the intersection under traffic signal control. • Operate the westbound left -turn movement with protected/permissive phasing. • Operate the eastbound right -turn movement with permitted -overlap phasing to run concurrently with the 1-40 EB off -ramp approach. Holly Shelter Road at 1-40 WB Ramps • Construct a northbound left -turn lane with a storage of 400 feet and appropriate taper length. Board of Commis$ Os - August 7, 2023 February 2023 ITEM: 9 - 10 - 1 Castle Hayne Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis Holly Shelter Road at Blue Clay Road Construct an eastbound right -turn lane with a minimum storage of 100 feet and appropriate taper length. Holly Shelter Road at Site Access #1 Construct Site Access #1 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #2/Concrete Plant Construct Site Access #2 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #3/Kerry Drive Construct Site Access #3 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Blue Clay Road at Site Access #4 Construct Site Access #4 as shown on the conceptual site plan to include one ingress lane and one egress lane. Recommended improvements are summarized in Figure ES-1. Board of Commi ft4s - August 7, 2023 February 2023 ITEM: 9 - 10 - 2 Concept Plan Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 11 - 1 F p`FzM RQ �C��cl cn 0 W c 0 CgST`Fyq VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE W) NORTH TOWNHOUSE BLDG, TYP. SITE DATA ' PROJECT ADDRESSES: 5210 HOLLY SHELTER RD; I 5735 BLUE CLAY RD t CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 I I PROPERTY OWNER: HOLLY TANK, LLC; BLUE TANK LLC 24BACKFIN PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PARCEL PINS: R01100-008-011-002 (± 23.01 AC) -- R01100-008-010-000 (± 49.38 AC) I P ASE 3 ' PROPOSED USE: MIXED RESIDENTIAL P ASE 4 FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: GENERAL RESIDENTIAL I TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: ± 72.39 ACRES , MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ± 24.32 ACRES TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX. ± 48.09 ACRES CURRENT ZONING: 1-1 (±69.45 AC) & R-15 (±2.94 AC) I PROPOSED ZONING: RMF-L VOR 1,670' RADIUS; 55HEIGHT LIMITATION FOR MAX DENSITY ALLOWED IN RMF-L: 10 DU / AC (724 UNITS) BUILDINGS WITHIN THIS AREA; w MAX PROJECT DENSITY PROPOSED: 7.20 DU / AC FAA APPROVAL REQUIRED ' I TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS: 521 UNITS Im MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS: 243UNITS , TOWNHOMES / SF / DUPLEX/ TRI/QUADRAPLEX. 278 UNITS w lal RMF-L PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONAL DATA od MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED Y I MIN. LOT AREA: 20,000 SF ± 1, 059, 379 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH: 100, EXCEEDS 100' �a w FRONT SETBACK 35' 50' MIN. o ) I J 13M - SIDE SETBACK (STREET): 30' 60' MIN. o N p ILL ' SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR): 25' (3 STORIES) 40' MIN. c6 ' c w REAR SETBACK: 30' (3 STORIES) 35' MIN. Z o Iw BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 3 STORIES (W/O ADD REGS.) 3 STORIES MAX. BUILDING SEPARATION 20' 20' MIN. a N° IQw I o z � a Q OTHER MIXED RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDED" IN I MIN. LOT AREA: 5, 000-17, 500 SF ± 2,094,800 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH: 50' EXCEEDS 50' FRONT SETBACK 20' 20' MIN. I I SIDE SETBACK (STREET): 10, 10' MIN. SIDE SETBACK (INTERIOR): 5' 5' MIN. I REAR SETBACK: 15' 15' MIN. I BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM: 3 STORIES MAX 2 STORIES FOR MAJORITY W/POTENTIAL FOR 3 STORIES MIXED IN I I AWAY FROM BLUE CLAY RD. BUILDING SEPARATION 20' 20' MIN. I ' *NOTE: SETBACKS LISTED AS MINIMUMS APPLY IF ANY LOTS ARE CREATED DURING PLATTING; AS DRAWN THIS PLAN, I ALL BUILDINGS FAR EXCEED MINIMUM SETBACKS BECAUSE NO LOTS ARE SHOWN. I SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: PHASING I I 1. THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN MULTIPLE PHASES, 4 ANTICIPATED I LANDSCAPING & BUFFERING NOTES I 1. STREETYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG HOLLY SHELTER ROAD AND BLUE CLAY ROAD IN I ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5.4.6 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO I 2. BUFFERYARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (SOUTHERN & EASTERN ' PROPERTY LINE) WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS I I OF SECTION 5.4.3 OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY UDO 3. ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LIDO. SIDEWALKS 1. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.3.3.J.f OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY LIDO I I STORMWATER & UTILITIES 1. STORM WATER SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NEW HANOVER COUNTY AND ORMWATER STATE REQUIREMENTS. PONDS SHOWN IN GENERAL LOCATION AT THIS TIME, BUT DESIGN WILL I I POND ALTER AS ENGINEERING DESIGN PROGRESSES. ' 2. PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO THE SITE. ALL DESIGN AND PERMITTING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CFPUA, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, AND STATE I REGULATORS AS REQUIRED. I \ OPEN SPACE MULTI -FAMILY APARTMENTS: \ REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 4.86 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: ± 10.40 AC \ R 7 REMAINING MIXED RESIDENTIAL: \\\ �S�p �% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: ± 9.62 AC (20% OF GROSS AREA) PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: ± 20.43 AC OPEN SPACE INCLUDES AMENITIES, WETLANDS, BUFFERS, STREETYARDS, PONDS & EASEMENTS 41 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES: FLOOD INFORMATION: THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X - MINIMAL FLOOD RISK - AS SHOWN BY FEMA e`er p Jv ooy MAP NUMBER 3720324200K BEARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 16, 2007. �J�^'6.�i`'� WETLAND: INFORMATION: A PJD WETLAND DELINEATION AS PREPARED BY SEGI ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED BY THE ^3 a USACE ON MARCH 17, 2022 "y °°� �^y��� ,' \ SPECIMEN TREES: NO SPECIMEN TREES FOUND ON SITE. CONDITIONAL REZONING NOTE �„Q\o�tiooJe ALL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN CONVEY THE GENERAL INTENTION OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND MAXIMUM DENSITY ANTICIPATED; DESIGN MAY REQUIRE MINOR DEVIATIONS DURING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALL DESIGN WILL COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF APPROVAL FOR THE CONDITIONAL ZONING PLAN AND WITH NEW HANOVER COUNTY'S UDO. UDO SECTION 10.3.3.C.7.b FURTHER IDENTIFIES EXTENT OF CHANGE ALLOWED BEFORE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BOARD REVIEW. PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY TRC AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ZONING REGULATIONS AND LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. EXISTING R-15 CORRIDOR ALONG BLUE CLAY ROAD; NO BUILDINGS PROPOSED WITHIN R-15 AREA TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFER TO EXISTING HOMES ALONG BLUE CLAY RD. 18, 24' 18' 0.5' PARKING SPACE DRIVE AISLE PARKING SPACE 0.5' 1.5' UTILITY AND ACCESS EASMENT 1.5' PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT SLOPES= 3:1 2"-S9.5C SURFACE 6.5' SIDEWALK 6"-ABC BASE 6" ABC UNDER CURBING ✓ARIES -SEE PLAN 24" VERTICAL CURB PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. APARTMENT PRIVATE DRIVE WITH PARKING CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE \ _ r R \ p/0. R 14F 6 FONNGoB O 0'T0R (/qOq1�7 007 ENO --� OPEN SPACE \ \ I1��l1�■MAIL STORMWATER POND ROAD C ROAD D - INS 20' FRONT SETBACK= VARIES 1' TRAVELWAY PARKING STALL 1' 5' LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE 1' 1' SLOP SLOPE PROPOSED PHASE LINE 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT 1.80% SLOPE f- POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND SLOPES= 3:1 2"-S9.5B SURFACE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WATERS OF THE US LINE 6.5' SIDEWALK 6"- ABC BASE -7 VARIES - SEE PLAN MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB 6" STONE UNDER CURBING ZONING DIVISION LINE PAVING NOTE: ALL PAVING THICKNESS WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON SOILS SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DATA. NO TESTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AT THIS TIME, SO A MINIMUM PAVING SECTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE FURTHER EVALUATED WITH THE W PROPOSED WATER LINE AVAILABILITY OF SOILS DATA. AMENITY PARKING CROSS SECTION FM PROPOSED FORCEMAIN TOWNHOME NOT TO SCALE TOWNHOME WETLANDS i3 i3 i3 DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY VARIES 1 24' 1 5' VARIES PROPOSED BUILDINGS 18' MIN. 1 1, 18' MIN. 1/4" PER FT 1/4" PER FT �, PROPOSED SIDEWALKS / SLOPES= 3:1 1 1 1 -� SLOPES= 3:1 / CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1.5"-SF9.5A SURFACE 5' WIDTH -SEE PLAN / MODIFIED VALLEY SPILL CURB FOR LOCATION 6"-B25.0B BASE 6" STONE UNDER CURBING TYPICAL TOWNHOME WITH DRIVEWAY ROAD / CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. EXISTING DITCH; POTENTIAL_ - NON -WETLAND -WATERS OF _ - - - - T4E US,-rYP. / -LOOP C Iir_ OPEN I ° MAIN APARTMENT ACCESS -{- STORMWATER II POND ash r--- _ SPACE S, ROADOPEN\ PACE I PUMP ' TATION AFT _J I 1 t_- I I� II I \ PACE OPEN CIO `-- lNgSE 3 SPACE y� I 1 a (nQ'Q I 1 O I = _� / Hqs I I o \ CL (L \ APARTMENT I� I U CLUBHOUSE, O OPEN SPACE I , I Q I j 0 AMENITY & � Fp STORMWATER LEASING OFFICE O Z.POND ` \ I , I o ' // � / I L � � I , w I I .. � • w,\LO I I ►� I o OP [3 I I X _ - �/ ---{ 0 OPEN STORMWATER POND 10'x70' SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP. J LLJ / J O J O Q O J O Q O a O J Z N W F J Q Z 00 F W O F O / W m Z w W F p co z U��p woin W ��Z dr�OfQ Qo�O �Mw- W ou,Z =R�o ���w 00 Z p W'Q ZXOLL, W QDQ�p O W <9bLY O O U �4b W'O Oob W CDMd'- o O W per(/! (7o w 0 No U�' W LLJ , W Mw LLJ_NZUj U IL Z2 ZMZ� ca K W th ZK Z� Llj W aOU' Cr 0 �0°D N W �0U) H N D U) 0U) D N D W NZ W 0� N0 W N o 0 Co a 0 U oND N N Z W LLl D7 U p W p Z p O p Z o O W N �� p p ; W= O D H a < U z U 0 z a X O Z U O Z 02 o Z �a J pa J a 4 I I TREE LINE REPRESENTS AREA INTENDED TO PRESERVE & AUGMENT, WHEN NEEDED, EXISTING VEGETATION AS BUFFER, TYP. / SPACE -- r '--'' w P�NPS�2�3 vv Iy� II I O- P \ OPEN SPACE u �i 13 I m I Z �I rn co ca J U �I Y� D�LU m/ Q I v mo =� F� col 0) w I O oQ �� mow/ ww J OPEN PACE I I I I \ OPEN SPACE I 2 / - - / D � m � 1 /I I o° _ O -i W I c: o J � 1- I I / . N W LOOP C A z 0- 0 A y OPEN - TRASH / �O I vz, g ?�T� � 1 / I PACT OR `" zh�1 SPACE m rW ILU I OPEN BUILDING 4 � QII I SPACE TORMWATER I I LL X / I I I POND I 1 1 ZONING -p IF_ Y R-15 ZONING I I I I - I TREE LINE II I °z I -I 30' SIDE STREET MULTI -FAMILY SETBACK- _ _VARIABLE WIDTH BUFFER / _ STREET YARD, TYP. BLUE CLAY ROAD 55' PUBLIC ROW - - p o F O J U Z V o F J W Q -z ,0. Z� L gUJ o(�D QFaW0 pwD w(jwo U wD U. W Z W N Z WNZ WoZ Z W ZO�W NN of O� N Z �O NAD 0a z 2a J 2a z O p as J J L- AMENITY / LEASING OFFICE AND POOL - r � DEAL MARK A I y z zz PID: R01116-001-004-000 p N z q 3 O m 7J (/1 O ZONING:R-15 mz,z A - (nZ N �1 I NOON LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL A z m m z m m z Z m�oA mA�z MZrnA OOD �Zrn cn - m�,oO V';12� ��o- -p z w< o0 mvoZ m�1oZ o� Z x z oD 60 o oz I> D o D S & W R ADY MIX CONCRETE COMPANY LLC I PID: R01200-002-002-001 ZONING: I-2 AND USE: CHEMICAL PLANT SECONDARY APARTMENT AC E S �{ 3-STORY, 27-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, TYP. �..I 0 100, 200' 300' N O R T H SCALE: 1"=100' �--I V) Z O W U w w v N � � O O 0 O LL � z W Z z J o d- U U W0- L Z o� 00 � � 0 N 00 Z O ct E W 4 ^ N cn 00 UZ� � o� Z U 0 Z A W o O 1� �+ T�� r'r'I O H 0 O�,,xw0 cob LU LU 1`! C) Z 9 11a-a O o� H < �5 z 0 0} O O LL F- Qa 0 Z - U < of (DLL �azno w g ow Z_ 0 o > Z Z Y J O U J W a_ L)aEly Q W J 0�: U 0 0(/)000 SEAL CRZ-1 PEI JOB#: 22208.PE Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 12 -1 Public Comments In Support Neutral In Opposition Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 1 Farrell, Robert From: noreply@civicpIus.com Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 2:05 PM To: May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject: Online Form Submission #3603 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name David Last Name Crosby Address 2235 Gateway Access Point STE 400 City Raleigh State NC Zip Code 27607 Email buzz.crosbyCa�martinmarietta.com Projects available for PB Meeting - Z23-12 - Oasis on Blue Clay and Holly Shelter - comment. Residential Development What is the nature of your Neutral comment? Public Comment Re: Rezoning Request Z23-12 — Petition to Rezone 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road (the "Subject Property") Dear Honorable Members of the New Hanover County Planning Board: Martin Marietta is pleased to be a member of the New Hanover County and Castle Hayne community as the long-time operator of the Castle Hayne Quarry and Rail Yard located at 5635 Holly Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 2 Shelter Road (the "Martin Marietta Property"). The Martin Marietta Property is an active operation that includes quarrying and transloading activities. Our investments in the community are well established and will continue to provide a positive impact for its residents for years to come. We are proud to be part of New Hanover County's long-term growth and prosperity. We understand the owner of the property located at 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road, the Subject Property, has filed a rezoning application to allow development for residential use. The Subject Property is located south of our property. As a fully operational quarry and aggregates rail yard, there will be ongoing mining activities including but not limited to crushing, blasting, aggregate processing, heavy equipment operations, rail car unloading, and truck loading, that will occur on the property itself, along with the ongoing use of Holly Shelter Road, as well as other ancillary operations that may occur on our land adjacent to the actual quarry and yard. Martin Marietta is committed to being a responsible neighbor, and we have a history of mutual cooperation with our residential neighbors at other sites throughout the country. Given the Martin Marietta Property is already authorized for quarrying and rail yard operations, we want to ensure that the County Commissioners, Planning Board, and the potential developer of the Subject Property are aware of the current and future use of our property. The proposed zoning map would locate all of the proposed multifamily development approximately 3,500 feet west of the Castle Hayne Quarry and Rail Yard entrance, which places any residential access to Holly Shelter Road between industrial operations, and the corresponding traffic, and the shortest access to Interstate 40. We respectfully ask the Planning Board to consider requiring the developer to give notice of the existence of the quarry and our existing operations to any residential purchaser or tenant. Martin Marietta values our community partnerships and neighbor relationships. I appreciate your consideration and would be happy to visit with the board in -person at any time. Best regards, David N. Crosby Regional Vice President Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 3 Farrell, Robert From: noreply@civicpIus.com Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 9:54 AM To: May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject: Online Form Submission #3656 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name Shawn Last Name Baker Address 5312 Holly Shelter Rd. PO Box 400 City Castle Hayne State NC Zip Code 28429 Email sbaker(a)snwreadymix.com Projects available for PB Meeting - Z23-12 - Oasis on Blue Clay and Holly Shelter - comment. Residential Development What is the nature of your Oppose project comment? Public Comment See attached letter. Thank you. Upload supporting files If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload the files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc, docx, ppt, pptx, txt, pdf, jpg, png. File 1 New Hanover County (Rezoning Ltr) (5.31).pdf Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 4 TITAN' AMERICA Titan America LLC 5700 Lake Wright Drive Suite 300 Norfolk, Virginia 23502 Telephone (757) 858-6500 Fax (757) 855-7707 www.titanamerica.com May 31, 2023 New Hanover County Planning Board 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Rezoning Request Z23-12 — Petition to Rezone 5210 Holly Shelter Road and 5735 Blue Clay Road (the "Subject Property") To Whom it May Concern: S&W Ready Mix Concrete Company LLC ("S&W"), as a proud member of the New Hanover County and Castle Hayne Community and owner/operator of the concrete manufacturing facility located at 5312 Holly Shelter Road, submits this letter in formal opposition to the pending rezoning application that has been filed by the owner of the above -referenced Subject Property, which purports to rezone that property as residential. Due to the nature of our business and other businesses in the area, we have significant concerns related to this rezoning. S&W is and always has been committed to being an involved, understanding, and responsible neighbor and member of the community. As such, we thought it prudent to submit this letter to ensure that the County Commissioners, Planning Board, and potential developers of the Subject Property are fully aware of S&W's current use of our property due to the proximity of the Subject Property. Our facility (as well as many other industrial sites in the area) often begins operations extremely early in the morning, which means the operation of a variety of equipment and vehicles necessary to support the business. The lights, noise, and traffic associated with this equipment and these vehicles is wholly incompatible with a neighboring residential development. We ask the Planning Board to take into consideration this incompatibility. Heavy industrial operations and residential developments can certainly manage to coexist; however, to do so zoning and planning must be carefully considered to maintain consistency among the expectations and needs of the overall community. The proposed commingling of zoning classifications here, Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 5 however, undoubtedly clouds these needs and expectations in a way that can be wholly avoided by a denial of the rezoning application. If the rezoning application is approved, we will of course remain committed to our role in the community. In such instance, however, we must request that the developer be required to provide comprehensive notice of and information related to our existing facility and operations to any prospective purchaser or tenant. Respectfully submitted, Shawn Baker General Manager Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 9 - 13 - 6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Zach Dickerson, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Zach Dickerson; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SU BJ ECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, Residential to (CZD) R-5, Residential for a maximum of 7 single-family residential lots. (See page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map.) BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 0.92 acres from the R-15, Residential zoning district to the (CZD) R-5, Residential district for a maximum 7 unit detached single-family development. The concept plan consists of 7 detached single-family dwellings on 7 lots. The concept plan also includes open space behind the 7 lots which will also be used for stormwater management. Where the site abuts N College Road, the concept plan includes a 20' wide common area that is set aside for possible future right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT- this is included as a condition. The applicant has also included as a condition that no Accessory Dwelling Units will be permitted on these lots. The applicant has provided conditions that no trees in the open space will be removed except for those required for stormwater management, and that there will be shared access driveways to limit driveway cuts. The R-15 district in this area was established in 1972. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. Since that time, public water and sewer services have become available to the surrounding area. The R-5 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density single-family detached and single-family attached development on smaller lots. The district allows a range of housing types and can serve as a transition between mixed -use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential development. As currently zoned, the site would permit 4 dwelling units on the 4 platted lots. The proposed 7 units would result in an overall density of 7 units per acre. It is estimated the site would generate 3 AM and 4 PM peak hour trips as currently zoned. The proposed R-5 development is estimated to generate 5 AM and 7 PM peak hour trips, increasing the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 2 AM and 3 PM trips. The proposed project's peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold required a Traffic Impact Analysis, but NCDOT will review the project through the driveway permitting process. The proposed project is located along a major arterial highway that is currently over capacity; however, the N College Road improvements are expected to improve traffic conditions in this area in the next several years. Based on Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10 preliminary designs, the future improvements to N College Road and Shelley Drive will restrict access to these properties. NCDOT has stated that future access would be accommodated through the roadway design process that may reduce the potential for traffic conflicts, but this design has not yet been finalized. Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Blair Elementary School, Trask Middle School, and New Hanover High School. Based on a generalized historic generation rate, staff would estimate the increase in homes would result in approximately 1 more student that the estimated number of students generated under existing zoning. Most of the surrounding development is residential, however there is a convenience store across Shelley Drive from these parcels. This area of Kings Grant serves as an entrance to the neighborhood, transitioning from the more heavily driven N College Road to slower neighborhood roads. The Comprehensive Plan designates these properties as General Residential, a place type that focuses on lower - density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. The General Residential place type recommends housing densities up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed rezoning request is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the project is in line with the density and housing type recommendations for the General Residential place type. The project would provide a transition between the high -intensity roadway corridor and the existing low -density neighborhood. The Planning Board considered this application at the July 6, 2023 meeting. The Planning Board voted to recommend approval of the petition (5-0), with the Board recommending a wording change to condition four to allow for less specificity in the required location of the four driveway cuts. 1. No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be no more than four driveway cuts across the seven lots. The Planning Board found it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. The Board also found RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project was reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Intelligent Growth & Economic Development o Encourage development of complete communities in the unincorporated county ■ Ensure NHC has appropriate housing to support business growth RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff's recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations and Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10 technical review. While the proposal is in line with the density recommended by the place type, and the project would provide slightly more housing than is currently zoned, planned NCDOT improvements are expected to impact existing and future development in this corridor. The proposed R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential Place type, and the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. Staff concurs with the Planning Board's recommendation and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower - density neighborhood. Proposed Conditions: 1. No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT forfuture highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be no more than four driveway cuts across the seven lots. Alternative Motion for Denial (if, based on information provided at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds recommending denial appropriate) I move to DE NY the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing potential safety concerns for vehicles exiting the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impacting future residents of the proposed homes. ATTACHMENTS: Z23-13 BOC Script Z23-13 BOC Staff Report Z23-13 Zoning Map Z23-13 Future Land Use Map Z23-13 Mailout Map Initial Application Coker Sheet Z23-13 Application Concept Plan Corer Sheet Z23-13 Concept Plan Z23-13 Public Comments Coker Sheet Z23-13 Public Comments in Opposition Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10 Z23-13 Staff Presentation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with staff conditions. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z23-13) Rezoning Request (Z23-13) - Request by Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions, LLC, applicant, to rezone four parcels totaling approximately 0.92 acres of land located at 4801, 4805, 4809, and 4813 Shelley Drive from R-15, Residential to (CZD) R-5, Residential for a maximum of 7 single-family residential lots. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation and supporter comments (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) f. Staff review of any additional conditions 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Before we proceed with the vote, I would like to invite the applicant to the podium. Based on the Board discussion and items presented during the public hearing, would you like withdraw your petition or proceed with a vote? 6. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request ' is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. Proposed Conditions 1 . No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be no more than four driveway cuts across the seven lots. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 1 -1 I= Alternative Motion for Denial (if, based on information provided at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds recommending denial appropriate) I move to DENY the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing potential safety concerns for vehicles exiting the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impacting future residents of the proposed homes. Alternative Motion for Approval/Denial: I move to [Approve/Deny] of the proposed rezoning to a conditional R-5 district. I find it to be [Consistent/Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval/Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z23-13 CONDITIONAL REZONING APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z23-13 Request: Rezoning to a Conditional R-5 district Applicant: Property Owner(s): Whit Beebe, Rolina Homes NC, LLC Rolina Homes, NC LLC Location: Acreage: 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive 0.92 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R04216-020-005-000, R04216-020-004-000, General Residential R04216-020-003-000, R04216-020-002-000 Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped 7 Single -Family Detached Dwellings Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R-15 (CZD) R-5 It North ZONING B-2 0 R-10 0 R-15 O Z23-13 a f/� � aa� ■ f 111pi �Viff'SEEN SURROUNDING AREA AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single -Family Residential R-15 East Single Family Residential R-15 South BP Gas Station and Convenience Store B-2 West N College Road & Single -Family Residential R-10 Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 1 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 1 North m d'qr / Shelley Dr rr ZONING HISTORY July 1, 1972 Initially zoned R-15, area 9A COMMUNITY SERVICES Water/Sewer Water and sanitary sewer services are available through CFPUA. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Murrayville Station Schools Blair Elementary, Trask Middle, and New Hanover High Schools Recreation Kings Grant Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 2 Page 2 of 18 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN t .. North ° ❑ x� Open Space / Stormwater Rny !qgC� ,. ° water fq Band n ter:. f I �:oa—.. �. .,, -Yr .•.,n O -ifi r 1 I t A, , F__ __1 I 7_J��,_ l„ + 1<L3! U �l $ + ! =r .r.: l 19 I T y:°� 4 I f... 'Lot � LOr� � " �... 31, >.r.. r J. L f 5 J �� f + OF it LJ v l r Shelley Dri Includes Staff Markups • The applicant is proposing to construct seven single-family detached housing units on seven lots. • Under the proposed (CZD) R-5 zoning district, the applicant has proposed a condition that no Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are allowed. • The applicant's proposed conceptual plan includes 8,050 sq ft of open space to the north of the lots to be used for open space and stormwater management. • The applicant's proposed conceptual plan includes a 20' common area to the west of the lots that will be set aside for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway projects. • The applicant has agreed to a condition to preserve all trees in the open space except those necessary for removal for stormwater. • The applicant has also agreed to a condition that there will be no more than four driveway cuts across the seven lots. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 3 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 3 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 district in this area was established in 1972. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. Since that time, water and sewer services have become available. • While the site is zoned R-15, the N. College Road corridor is a heavily traveled roadway. There is some commercial development nearby, namely the fuel stations to the south. • As currently zoned, the subject site would be allowed four single-family dwellings- one on each of the four existing lots. • Both the R-15 and R-5 zones permit ADUs by -right. However, the applicant's proposed condition restricts development to one house per lot. • Conventional Residential Subdivisions require 10% of the total area to be set aside as open space. Performance Residential Subdivisions require 20% of the total area as open space. The total area of this development, at 40,035 square feet, would require 4,004 sq ft of open space in a Conventional Residential Subdivision, and 8,008 sq ft of open space in a Performance Residential Subdivision. The applicant's concept plan includes 18,050 sq ft of open space, exceeding this requirement. • The R-5 district was established to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density single-family detached and single-family attached development. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and zoning compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 4 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 4 AREA DEVELOPMENTS a-- STIP Project ..�� Approved TIA Subdivisions • - +I viol 1 Construction �RIi:' I�Ilrlr � 111111 i- � err,- r Subject .girl �■ r I11Ir�f � v fulrr� r ill/lli � FJr1 {1►Iartin;LutheVK� ynJ�,� Azalea Landing Estrella Landint Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 5 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 5 TRANSPORTATION roc o —Lord-Nance,Court tior�'f o I � -- -- Shelley•�ri�e 0 u j R Primary Access: q° Drive Way Access , Shelley Drive f via College Road L CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning Typical development under current zoning would allow a maximum of 4 single-family dwelling units. PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access Shelley Drive via full -access driveways. Secondary Access N/A EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway N College Shelley Drive Type of Roadway NCDOT Principle Arterial Local Road Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 41,369 10,979 Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 48,500 N/A Latest WMPO Point -in -Time County (DT) 41,231 N/A Current Level of Congestion Over Capacity N/A Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 6 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 6 NEARBY NCDOT STIP ROADWAY PROJECTS - Improvements to College Road from Gordon Road to New Centre Drive. - May include additional lanes, possible interchanges at Kings Drive and Ringo Street and minor modifications of the College U-5881 — College Road (NC 132) Road/Market Street interchange. Improvements - This project will close the intersection of Shelley Drive and N College Road. Traffic will be routed further east on Shelley Drive, to travel north on Kings Grant Dr to access N College Road. - 2025-2028 ROW acquisition and bidding. - Project encompasses access management improvements on US 17 Bus. Between CSX Railroad to Cinema Drive and Jacksonville U-4902B — US 17 Business (Market St) Street to north of US 1 17/NC 132 (College Rd). - Right -of -Way is in progress. - Project encompasses access management improvements on US 17 Bus. From US 1 17/NC U-4902C — US 17 Business (Market St) 132 (College Road) to Station Road. - Right -of -Way is in progress. - Widening of Gordon Road from 1-40 to US 17 U-6202 (Gordon Road) Bus. (Market St). - Anticipated start date of Summer 2024. TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic Traffic Generated Potential Generated by by Proposed Impact of Present Designation Proposed Designation Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 3 5 +2 PM Peak Hour Trips 4 7 +3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 7 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 7 SUMMARY The proposed project is located along a major arterial highway that is currently over capacity; however, the N College Road improvements are expected to improve traffic conditions in this area in the next several. years. Based on preliminary designs, the future improvements to N College Road and Shelley Drive will restrict access to these properties. NCDOT has stated that future access would be accommodated through the roadway design process that may reduce the potential for traffic conflicts, but this design has not yet been finalized. The proposed project's peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold requiring a traffic impact analysis, but NCDOT will review the project through the driveway permitting process. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 8 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 8 ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area. The property is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Smith Creek watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) & III (severe limitation) soils. However, the site is expected to be served by CFPUA when developed. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Schools • Students living in the proposed development would be assigned to Blair Elementary School, Trask Middle School, and New Hanover High School. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year-round elementary, or specialty high schools. • A maximum of 4 dwelling units would be permitted under the current R-15 zoning base density, and 7 units could potentially be developed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 3 dwelling units. Based on a generalized historic generation rate*, staff would estimate that the increase in homes would result in approximately 1 additional student than would be generated under current zoning. The general student generation rate provides only an estimate of anticipated student yield as different forms of housing at different price points yield different numbers of students. Over the past four years, staff has also seen a decline in the number of students generated by new development. Student numbers remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2020 (excepting the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic), while 14,500 new residential units were permitted across the county. In addition, the student population is anticipated to only grow by approximately 1,300 students over the next 10 years based on the most recent New Hanover County Schools Facility Needs Study. Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Yield (current general student generation rate) Existing Development Undeveloped Approximate** Total: 0 (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Typical Development Under 4 residential units Approximate** Total: 1 Current Zoning (0 elementary, 0 middle, 0 high) Proposed Zoning 7 residential units Approximate** Total: 2 (1 elementary, 0 middle, 1 high) *The current general student generation rate was calculated by dividing the New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2022-2023 school year by the number of dwelling units in the county. Currently, there are an average of 0.22 public school students (0.09 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.07 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. These numbers are updated annually and include students attending out - of -district specialty schools, such as year-round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTech. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 9 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 9 **Because the student generation rate often results in fractional numbers, all approximate student generation yields with a fraction of 0.5 or higher are rounded up to a whole number and yields with a fraction of less than 0.5 are rounded down. This may result in student numbers at the elementary, middle, and high school levels not equaling the approximate total. Staff has provided information on existing school capacity to provide a general idea of the potential impact on public schools, but these numbers do not reflect any future capacity upgrades. School Enrollment* and Capacity** (2022-2023 School Year) Total Enrollment of Capacity of Capacity of Funded or Level NHC School Assigned Assigned Assigned Planned Capacity School School School Capacity w/Portables Upgrades Elementary 91 % Blair 421 525 80% None Middle 92% Trask 672 655 103% None High 98.5% New Hanover 1467 1678 87.4% None *Enrollment is based on the New Hanover County Schools student numbers for the 2022-2023 school year. **Capacity calculations were determined based on the capacities for the 2022-2023 school year, and funded or planned capacity upgrades were those included in the Facility Needs Study presented by New Hanover County Schools to the Board of Education in January 2021. This information does not take into account flexible scheduling that may be available in high school settings, which can reduce the portion of the student body on campus at any one time. • The 2021 facility needs survey prepared by Schools staff indicates that, based on NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) student growth projections and school capacity data, planned facility upgrades, combined with changes to student enrollment patterns, will result in adequate capacity district wide over the next ten years if facility upgrades are funded. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 10 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 10 New Hanover County Strategic Plan • One of the goals of the New Hanover County Strategic Plan for 201 8-2023 is to encourage the development of complete communities in the unincorporated county by increasing housing diversity and access to basic goods and services. • The predominant housing type in the area is single family detached at 89%. Under the proposed R-5 district the site would allow for single family detached homes. Due to the number of units proposed, single family detached would remain at 89%. • The subject property is located in the Gateway community area, where 40% of residents currently live within one -mile of a convenience need (grocery store, retail staples, pharmacies, etc.), a support service (urgent care, primary doctor's office, child & adult care, etc.), and a community facility (public park, school, museum etc.). Under the proposed R-5 district and the number of units proposed, there would be no change to the number of residences within one -mile of goods and services. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 11 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 11 Representative Developments Representative Developments of R-15 in the Kings Grant neighborhood (Existing Zoning: Kings Grant, Shelley Drive Kings Grant, Shelley Drive Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 12 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 12 Representative Developments of R-5 (Proposed Zoning: R-5 in the City of Wilmington Smith Creek Village on New Centre Drive near Kerr Avenue Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 13 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 13 Context and Compatibility • The properties are located at an entrance to the Kings Grant subdivision at the intersection of Shelley Drive and N College Road. • The majority of the Kings Grant neighborhood is zoned for low -density residential. • While most of the surrounding area is residential, the properties lie across Shelley Drive from a fuel station and convenience store. • As the concept plan notes, NCDOT plans to make improvements to the N College Road corridor with a 2025-2028 ROW acquisition and bidding date, focusing on the section between New Centre Drive and Gordon Road. The applicant has set aside common space for possible future NCDOT right of way acquisition. • NCDOT's plan includes a right turn off N College Road which will result in the removal of the fuel station and convenience store to the south of these parcels, and which will likely restrict access to these parcels. • This roadway project has been incorporated with STIP project U-5792 and is in the design phases. Project design includes elevation of N College over Ringo Drive, Martin Luther King Jr Parkway and Kings Grant. • This project will restrict the Shelley Drive access at N College Road. NCDOT indicated that a small stem of Shelley may be created to accommodate access to the parcels, but this would come later in design and right-of-way plan preparation. • While transitions from commercial to progressively lower housing densities is preferred, the funded NCDOT project is anticipated to acquire additional right-of-way that will eliminate some of these transitions and place the highway in closer proximity to existing residential uses. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 14 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 14 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Site „ram z Dr m o� COMMERCE EMPLOYMENTENTCENTER f j�1T Tn I ' r rTh Q GENERAL RESIDENTIAL I- Crest Wp od Dr URBAN MIXED USE CONSERVATION ''�-������ �[�� .�u �� SIT j y1{ L,.OVel C(�3t;, f Future Land Use General Residential Map Place Type Focuses on lower -density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses Place Type should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while Description recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single-family residential, low -density multi -family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreation. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 15 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 15 The subject properties are located along Shelley Drive at its intersection with N College Road, a heavily traveled roadway. Most of the surrounding development is residential, however there is a convenience store across Shelley Drive from these parcels. This area of Kings Grant serves as an entrance to the neighborhood, transitioning from the more heavily driven N College Road to slower neighborhood roads. The Comprehensive Plan classifies the properties as General Residential, which promotes lower -density, single family uses and light commercial. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a maximum density of 8 units per acre in Analysis the General Residential place type. The applicant is proposing 7 houses on 7 parcels, for an overall density of approximately 7 units per acre. The proposed use is in line with the Comprehensive Plan's recommendations for the General Residential Place type. While the surrounding Kings Grant neighborhood remains zoned for low -density residential, the location of these parcels is adjacent to the high - traffic N College Road corridor; the higher -density housing proposal could help serve as a transition from high -traffic to low -density housing. Future access to these parcels may be complicated by NCDOT planned improvements. The proposed (CZD) R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Consistency Comprehensive Plan because the project is in line with the density and Recommendation housing type recommendations for the General Residential place type. The project would provide a transition between the high -intensity roadway corridor and the existing low -density neighborhood. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 16 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 16 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at the July 6, 2023 meeting. The Planning Board voted to recommend approval of the petition (5-0), with the Board recommending a wording change to condition four to allow for less specificity in the required location of the four driveway cuts. The Planning Board found it to be CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. The Board also found RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the project was reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff's recommendation is based on the policy guidance of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, zoning considerations and technical review. While the proposal is in line with the density recommended by the place type, and the project would provide slightly more housing than is currently zoned, planned NCDOT improvements are expected to impact existing and future development in this corridor. The proposed R-5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential Place type, and the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. Staff concurs with the Planning Board's recommendation and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the project will provide housing in close proximity to other residential uses, transitioning from a high traffic corridor into a lower -density neighborhood. Proposed Conditions 1 . No accessory dwelling units will be permitted on these lots. 2. Area for possible right-of-way acquisition by NCDOT for future highway project will be set aside in common area. 3. All trees will remain in open area except those removed for stormwater. 4. There will be no more than four driveway cuts across the seven lots. Alternative Motion for Denial (if, based on information provided at the public hearing or other consideration beyond the scope of staff review, the Board finds recommending denial appropriate) I move to DENY the proposed rezoning. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the types of Z23-1 3 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 17 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 17 uses and recommended density for the General Residential place type, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request reasonable and in the public interest because the planned improvements to N College Road will restrict future access to the site increasing potential safety concerns for vehicles exiting the highway and increases single-family housing directly adjacent to a major highway corridor, impacting future residents of the proposed homes. Z23-13 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 18 of 18 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 2 - 18 Case: Z23-13 Site Address: 4800 Block of Shelley Drive COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE CONSERVATION Z23-13 Existing Zoning/Use: R-15 ens Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 4 - 1 Proposed Zoning/Use: N CZD R-5 0 ME �0 =�: 1 ��I�`i►�� mu1MEMO PIP ►��� �1� ��►� ON o 0 o g 111■��Ii._ � _ ��.� �OV Hanover County, NC Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Zoning/Use: N Z23-13 4800 Block of R-15 CZD R-5 Shelley Drive J4 1XI wV � g. �. r '.a. -4 rl INIM Initial Application Documents & Materials Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-7165 FAX (910) 798-7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING APPLICATION This application form must be completed as part of a conditional zoning application submitted through the county's online COAST portal. The main procedural steps in the submittal and review of applications are outlined in the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well as the standards to be applied in reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. (Optional) Pre -Application Conference 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information Applicant/Agent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) Cindee Wolf Rolina Homes NC, L.L.C. Company Company/Owner Name 2 Design Solutions Address Address P.O. Box 7221 501 Bramson Court City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Wilmington, NC 28406 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Phone Phone 910-620-2374 804-516-6290 (Contact: Whit Beebe) Email Email cwolf@lobodemar.biz whitbeebe@rolinahomes.com Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 1 of 6 ITEM: 10- 7-L-1onditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 2. Subject Property Information Address/Location Parcel Identification Number(s) 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive 314805.18.6331, 7239, 8229 & 9238 Total Parcel(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Use(s) Future Land Use Classification 40,035 s.f. (0.92 ac.) R-15 General Residential 3. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District: CZD / R-5 I Total Acreage of Proposed District: 0.92 ac. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses permitted in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. 4. Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 2 of 6 ITEM: 10- 7-C2onditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: Single-family Homes (210) Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) per Dwelling Unit (7) AM Peak Hour Trips: 5 I PM Peak Hour Trips: 7 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the objectives outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at -large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 3 of 6 ITEM: 10- 7-C3onditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 4 of 6 ITEM: 10- 7-donditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N/A". Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checklist ❑ This application form, completed and signed Applicant Initial CAW ❑ Application fee: • $600 for 5 acres or less • $700 for more than 5 acres • $300 in addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review CAW ❑ Community meeting written summary CAW ❑ Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. The Planning Board may choose to continue the hearing until the official TIA approval letter is provided. • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on the Board of Commissioners meeting agenda. NSA ❑ Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning CAW ❑ Conceptual Plan including the following minimum elements: Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, building areas and other improvements o For residential uses, include the maximum number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by the structures; and/or proposed subdivision boundaries. o For non-residential uses, include the maximum square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area structures will occupy, and the specific purposes for which the structures will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights -of -way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights -of -way, and buffers. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 acres, the exact location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be included. • Approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities intended to serve the site. • Approximate location of regulated wetlands. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance CAW ❑ One (1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. CAW ❑ One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans CAW Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 Page 5 of 6 ITEM: 10- 7 -conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 02-2022 7. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and 4. Pr vide written co to any and all conditions of approval. Whit Beebe for Rolina Homes NC, L.L.C. Signature of Property Owner(s) Print Nome(s) Cynthia Wolf - Design Solutions Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name Note. This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. if delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request of the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning websife will be required. Page 6 of 6 Board of Commissioners - 1N9YP)JJQ;4,g District Application — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 10- 7 - 6 - a� Xh+ •# In Ab y � fi4' q , " '�f ,. ,,fir 'a{ ?" d.• � '�f'. 1'� r ' y Y �e •,. ers - August 7, 2023LV L. +, r 1�7-7� -tot ME VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) HWY 132 W J O1 W LORD - 30.5' I N Co I N \N I 1 116"PINE I I I I I I / I ^) I I I 29.4' i °� 11�NE N Co N � N> m l I� 14' PINE ICo �4 a N O I I r 1 O I I I o FIBER z Z I I I OPTIC II I VAULT I I 31.3' 29.4' I I I �l I �! 29.5' \ \ \ \ 28.2' EIP oy SETBACKS FRONT: 25' FRONT: 30' (PER M.B. 17, PG. 44) SIDE STREET: 15' SIDE: 10' REAR: 20' (PER NHC UDO R-15 ZONING) SYMBOL LEGEND: • EI* EXISTING IRON *PIPE / *ROD A WATER VAVLE FIRE HYDRANT SIGN `� POWER POLE -3 GUY WIRE LINETYPE LEGEND: 30.7' A TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TEL 0 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AELECTRICAL PEDESTAL FFIBER OPTIC MARKER 25.5'o GROUND SHOT ELEVATION \,3, TREE SIZE & SPECIES SURVEYED LINES (BOUNDARY) BUILDING SETBACK LINE LINES NOT SURVEYED (ADJOINERS) - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LINE CENTER LINE OF ROAD DITCH TOP DITCH BOTTOM - -OHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE ---- 24 - MINOR CONTOUR WITH ELEVATION --- 25 - MAJOR CONTOUR WITH ELEVATION ABBREVIATIONS: ECM EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT EIR EXISTING IRON ROD RBS REBAR SET TYP TYPICAL MGS MAG NAIL SET CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 1 I I LOT 877 KINGS GRANT 1 SECTION 14 I MAP CABINET 17, PAGE 44 MELISSA RODRIGUEZ I DEED BOOK 6416, PAGE 59 1 I I 1 / 1 / I S .42' 34" E / / 28.42' EIR \ EIR 030.2' 8"MAPLE ^� CLUSTERE1 14" INE S 7g3227" E 71.58' I ®30.6' 2*E I r " 24�E y , 10 OAK -31 8" CL EIR LOT 878 KINGS GRANT SECTION 14 MAP CABINET 17, PAGE 44 DAVID K. & BILLIE J. MILLARD DEED BOOK 6399, PAGE 1990 LOT 879 KINGS GRANT SECTION 14 MAP CABINET 17, PAGE 44 DANIEL L. & WENDY T. KREPPS DEED BOOK 6408, PAGE 2467 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE Cl 1214.85 110.08 110.04 N 83'47 40 W 5'11 30 C2 1214.85' 31.41' 31.41' N 80'27'29" W 1'28'54" C3 20.00' 31.52' 28.35' N 34'31'53" W 90*17'02" LOT 880 KINGS GRANT SECTION 14 MAP CABINET 17, PAGE 44 BEVERLY C. JR, & ANITA D. COSTIN DEED BOOK 6400, PAGE 2895 6 PINE g qK 10 MAPLE - 31- S 79 42'52" E 99.9 T I I - 12 PINE 16"PNE / ®31.5' 14"PIE IPINE �14-PINE \ 20" INE EIP MAPLE 14"PIE 14"PINE 14"PINE 14PINE� 12 P� 12 PINE p -31 �j� 7943'08„ IN� 12 PINE 12PINIE E102.036"PINE 12PNE �_I 30 INE 10"TWIN I 1 "PINE MAPLE i6"PNE i6"PIN 12-PIN 30' 1 "PINE 8"OAK 14"PI E 12"PINE 1�E AINE 1 10 APLE 3 EIR \ / "PINE / -29 \ 14 PINE 14"PINE I 12"PIE 1\ \ 31 S 83 22'45" / ®28.41 I 12"PINE 8"TWIN K ( ' 12"PIN - 30.7® _ /'E�'+ OgN 14" NE 14'PINE 8"MAPLE CLUSTER EIR 16"PNE / / I 12 PINE 8 MA NOLIA 14"PNE $2AOK AK \ 10"MAPLE 16"PINE '� 4"PINE I 14 PINE g0 14"PIE 1 INE 2 I �14"PINE 12'PINE � 12 PINE � \\,�r 16"PINE 14'PI E 14"TRIPLE MAPLE 12" I E10 OAK QQ12" INE 12 PINE 24" NE 10" N OAK ®30.6' ®30.1' 1A 29.8, 8"TWI WEETGUM LOT V 8 9 10"MAPLE �V d r� _ 8"C ERRY 8"MAPLE ® O / 1�' 16"PNE °�� 12"PINE . - 1 "PINE E8"MAPLE -30 Q ®28.3' "12PINIE _ I _ 14,924 S.F. / / APINE / \ �r 8"TWIN 4801 SHELLEY DR o IPINE %� 8"oAK 20"PIN I OA 20 PINEPARCELID: 12"PINE 14'PINE 14"PIE E ®30.2' 14"PIN IPINE R04216-020-005-000 14"PIN% 16PINE/ 3 / 1 "OAK 12 PINE 12'PINE''1`\E14 PINE 12"PIN 1 "PIN 12 PINE 1"AK A I 12" 1 E 12PINIE �O, 0 24"PI EE c,a?r 1 PINE �� / 2 "PINE / / 14" INE �� QQ% _ / o LOT V lJ / �� / 12"PNE 12 PINE �12"P o a / 16"PNE APINE 1 "PINE8"TWIN MAGNOLIA 8" AK 12"PINE / 1*E 14 *E ®3 .6' T R R R ,� ° z' 12"PIN 4"PIN 12"PINE 2 "PINE / IN 12"PNE L O 1 v v v K 3 / ® 16"P NE 14, 991 S . F. � 14" 1 P E II i6"PNE ! / ®30.3' p 31.4 T MAGNOLIAA IN N 14 PINE I 14, 9 9 O S . F. 16"PNE 14"PINE \ LOT lJ V CO 20"P E 12 PINE E / 4805 SHELLEY DR o 1*14E /12" INE 12 PINE I 12"PINE / 12 PINE 1 14' INE ®31.5' / ^ � / I 15,327 S.F. PARCEL ID: �' 12PINE IPINE / ���', 16" INE 14"PIE 4 PINE R04216-020-004-000 / %� - � "� 8 TWIN/MAPLE _NE 14"TRIPLE OAK / /NE '"1'20"PINE 30.4' o 12"PINE ®31.6' 12" K 4809 SHELLEY DR ^� \ F\ 14 PINE / o / / r'� 26 INE 16"PNE ®31.4' he's PARCEL ID: 8'MAGNOLIA I6"PINE _ INE31.1� $ �14�E R04�IN6-020-003-000 /v> 12"PINE 00 LOT 885 G3 r, ®31.3' 14"PINE `� �� EXISTING EDGE 30.4' 14" IN- .�� 29.5' OF WOODS (TYP) _ 8" AK \ / ®31.3' KINGS GRANT 1 4813 SHELLEY DR SECTION 14 �10" NN MAPLE<� r', 12PINIE MAP CABINET 17, PAGE 44 14 PINE 14"PN / PARCEL ID: to 30.5' \ EIP 12PINIE BILLY M. STRICKLAND w 12 PINE _ 8"MAGNOLIA R04216-020-002-000 o DEED BOOK 6274, \ 29.5' \ 031.4' o PAGE 2741 N 79 43'00" W 80.00' 16"PNE 14 PINE 12"OAK d�+ "PINE 10"MAGNOLIA " _ 16 PI 3� 14 PINE 1 "PINE 14"PINE 16"PIN 12"PNE \ 29.5' � � EIR � � ��-30� �\ 31.3' 14 PINE 12"PINE \ \MAPLE CLUSTER \ 31.5'®'1\' 12PINE 30 7' -30 31.1' - 24"PINE �� ®31.4' 12PINIE ,� „ - 10\ ....... \ IP E 12"0 K 8"MAPL LUSTER- 14 NE_ o EIR 14 PINE I 315' 12"PINE D.E.P. EASEMENT 30 -31 ro DEED BOOK 6274, 12"PINE 20 PINE 3p 14"PIN I PAGE 1894 DOH �"PINE � 30.4' 30.5' EDGE ITCH �9'43 W OPTIC 12 PINE 30.8' 8"OAK a' EXISTING EDGE OF Pgt�MENT �� T4; � �52�� EIR VAULT ��� 12 PINE OF WOODS (TYP) ' 31.8' 14E DITCH � 30 �- �� �30 C2- EIR 30.6' �- - \ 32.8' ®� Lo OHE Cl S 89'11'03" E 118.10' (TIE) SITE BENCHMARK 30- _o"3p- �yYN_OHE EIP - - - - - - - - - - _ _ MAG NAIL SET IN PAVEMENT /\ AELc / ELEVATION: 30.59' 12 PINE 30.4' -�� �" POWER POLE - - _ SHE% 30.6' _ _OE �H��---- 15"CMP--------- LL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V � � �- - - - - �OHE� � INVERT: - 60 r P y �RI T j INVERT: 29.1' R1 VATr V 29.6' - l: t/W GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS IS A BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC AND TREE SURVEY. 2. BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP ARE REFERENCED TO MAP BOOK 17, PAGE 44. 3. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88. 4. PROPERTY IS ZONED: R-15 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT). 5. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. UNITS ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY. 8. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF SITE. 9. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THIS SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS AND EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL AND ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH. 10. FLOOD NOTE: AS DETERMINED BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING, THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #3720314800K, EFFECTIVE DATE AUGUST 28, 2018. 11, UTILITY STATEMENT: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM COUNTY GIS INFORMATION, EXISTING DRAWINGS & FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED, OR THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED. HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 12. COUNTY PARCEL ID: R04216-020-002-000, R04216-020-003-000, R04216-020-004-000, R04216-020-005-000. 13. MAP AND DEED REFERENCES SHOWN ARE PER THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRY. DB 5418-PG 2762, DB 6274-PG 1894, DB 6400-PG 2895. 14. CURRENT OWNER: TF HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1202 EASTWOOD ROAD, WILMINGTON, NC 28403 TOPOGRAPHY CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND ACCURATELY REPRESENTS THE PHYSICAL FEATURES THEREON WITHIN THE AREAS SURVEYED AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. THIS SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21NCAC56.1600) MCA Rp�`#%- �OFESS/qy9-' SEAL C: L-4556 -�y UR'4�cy 9 LEE GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 31.2' o z LL- O W V) 6 0 , z -Co: o N NO O NLl III N ( 0 0- a_ mN E w m o Z � Z w Y Cl) T (n Q Q oo� w C w \ w = o O Z p w U W W Q 0 z O 0 w Of z CD CO Cf� zl�C"I p w I L.L :2�i U Q V) 0 W z zQQ 00 W gym- z O a- ►� EIR u') z o Un a o L (V L U-) o o � �^ w III r LU a F a6 U �6 C/az0 �r L Z o � 00 N 0 LL it � w z ui = U J z JOB NO: ¢ 2 o 0 P303230080 ITEM: 10- 7 - 9 Legal Description for Conditional Zoning District 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive Beginning at a point in the eastern boundary of North College Road (N.C. Highway 132), a 200' public right-of-way; said point being at the intersection with the northern boundary of Shelley Drive (S.R. 2009), a 60' public right-of-way; and running thence with the N. College Road right- of-way: North 10016'35" East, 129.89 feet to a point; thence leaving the right-of-way, South 80009'34" East, 28.42 feet to a point; thence South 79032'27" East, 71.58 feet to a point; thence South 79042'52" East, 99.97 feet to a point; thence South 79043'08" East, 102.03 feet to a point; thence South 83022'45" East, 95.00 feet to a point; thence South 06004'15" West, 148.24 feet to a point in the northern boundary of Shelley Drive; thence with that right-of-way, Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 1214.85 feet and Length of 141.49 feet, a Chord of North 83003'13" West, 141.41 feet to a point; thence North 79043'00" West, 246.50 feet to a point; thence Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 20.00 feet and Length of 31.52 feet, a Chord of North 34031'53" West, 28.35 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 60,240 square feet, or 1.38 acres, more or less. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 10 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Rolina Homes / 4501, 4505, 4509 & 4513 Shelley Drive Proposed Zoning: R-15 to (CZD) R-5 (1.38 ac.) The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on May 18, 2023 . A copy of that written notice and site layout are also attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, May 30t" 6:00 p.m.; at Picnic Shelter #3, Long Leaf Park. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign -in list The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A brief presentation was given on the intent of the developer to construct seven (7) new 2-story, single-family homes. The process of rezoning was explained with the dates provided for the expected Planning Board and Commissioners public hearings. Conversation included future changes in traffic circulation due to the NCDOT project at the MLK Blvd. / N College Rd. intersection, architectural style, estimated onset of construction, and noise or other impacts during construction. Additional contact was made the following morning, and addressed in a return email (attached). Date: May 31, 2023 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf Board ot Uommissioners - August ITEM: 10- 7 - 11 Community Information Meeting Rolina Homes - Shelley Drive Date: May 30, 2023 Name Address Email (Optional) Jay Talbert 4810 Shelley Dr jtalbert@tbiilm.com Carolyn Brand 4818 Lord�Lnce cnbrand@ec.rr.com 44 Moench / Stauble 4817 Lord Nance Dr deirdre.moench@gmail.com Whit Beebe Owner / Developer whitbeebe@rolinahomes.com Cindee Wolf Project Planner cwolf@lobodemar.biz Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 12 From: cwolfCablobodemar.biz To: "Deirdre Moench" Cc: "whitbeebe rolinahomes.com" Subject: RE: Design Solution inquiry Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 9:20:00 AM Attachments: NCDOT Proi.odf Arch-5UIe.pdf CZD Plan Mav30.odf Sorry for the email delivery error. I have received your message. One of the differences in this land as compared to yours on a cul-de-sac is that the property across the street is zoned and used for commercial purposes. This parcel's location closer to the busy highway is certainly reasonable justification for a "transitional" use - but this Owner is not trying to yield an attached housing or non-residential use. The builder will need to adjust his marketing to offset those impacts, but based on the region's well -publicized deficit of homes for the influx of new residents, we believe that the project is a good one, and will be successful. Although the future NCDOT project is still several years to come, we have adjusted our layout to address the probability of land acquisition for widening. The intersection of Shelley Drive with N College Road will eventually be closed, in exchange for access from extension of the "service road" that currently ends at the Church. The additional trip generation between the four existing home lots and the proposed seven lots, is negligible to the overall traffic. Shelley Drive has adequate design capacity. This project will be required to provide stormwater management to meet current regulations by both the State and County - something that the older Kings Grant community does not have. Although the proposed architecture for the project is not the more traditional ranch -style of Kings Grant, again I cite the adjacency to the C-store, boarded -up retail building and 2-story office building. As to any impact on surrounding property values, new building in an older neighborhood typically enhances the values of the neighborhood not only with upgrade of aesthetics, by providing higher comparable appraisals with current market pricing. The process began with the community information effort. We intend to submit the rezoning petition to the County tomorrow, June 1 st. You will receive a notice directly from the County around the 3rd week of June that there is a public hearing by the Planning Board on Thursday, July 6th. That is the opportunity for anyone to come out and speak in support, or opposition, to the proposal. That Board provides a recommendation to the Commissioners who will have the ultimate vote on approval or denial on Monday, August 7th. You will also receive notice of the meeting, and is the final public hearing for you to voice your sentiment. I have added your contact and comments to the "Report of Public Meeting" that will be included with the submittal. I have included some additional exhibits about the project. Please do not hesitate to reach out again if you have more questions. Thank you. Cindee Wolf -----Original Message ----- From: Deirdre Moench <deirdre.moench@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 7:07 PM To: cwolf@lobodemar.biz Subject: Design Solution inquiry Dear Cindee Wolf, My husband and I own a home within 500 feet of the new build you are proposing in Kings Grant. As a Home Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 13 owner in this space I am concerned predominantly with safety. Shelly Drive is a busy road, as it comes off N College road into our neighborhood. Incorporating 7 homes in this very small space against the highway and it's traffic seems profoundly dangerous for those of us who travel this way in and out of the neighborhood. What do you plan to do to avoid accidents? What precautions are you thinking about to ensure the people of this community are safe? Another issue that the people who purchase these 7 homes will face are profound traffic noise. Do you have any intent to help buffer them from that noise? The lack of wooded land also adds considerable noise to our street. What do you plan to do to help with that? Aesthetically, the homes you're proposing do not fit the neighborhood. Is it possible to adjust the number of homes, if you're determined to build, to make them match the neighborhood? Our community is unique to this city and we are concerned about the damage this quick, dangerous build will bring to our nice quiet home. Finally, what can we do to leave this small parcel of land as is to help absorb water due the increased need for green space in Wilmington. I'm sure you're aware that hurricane flooding is a serious concern, and while we are not in a flood space, it is necessary to maintain as much land, without pavement, to absorb water. What are your concerns in regard to this topic? Your initial note says there are benefits and improvements that this build will bring to our neighborhood. What are those? Additionally, what impacts do you foresee? Also, who can we contact with the county to discourage allowing you to move forward with this building proposal? Thank you for your time to answer our questions. Deirdre Moench & Zack Stauble Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 14 13 13 rr ❑ 1 I AV A # 00,, numt ' El P4 0'', 13 13 13 13 i. Id 377 �, 0 a to a � K Y WNW— 4 p Board of Commissioners - Augu t 7, 2023 {,All ITEM: 10- 7 - 15 500' PERIMETER FROM 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 SHELLEY DRIVE: SUBJECT PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS CITY / STATE / ZIP ROLINA HOMES NC LLC 501 BRAMSON CT MOUNT PLEASANT SC 29464 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 4810 GREENWAY LLC PO BOX 12307 WILMINGTON NC 28405 BANISTER WILLIAM KSANDRA D 1014 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 BARTELS JEFFREY F LORI R 4813 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 BIGHAM JAMES A BARBARA J 145 GREENCREST CIR JACKSONVILLE INC 28540 BLACKBURN KYLE ALEXANDER 1006 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 BRAND CAROLYN N 4818 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 BRUNNER RAYMOND C MICHELLE 910 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 CAVENAUGH THOMAS JR JANICE 821 RIVAGE PROMENADE WILMINGTON NC 28412 CLARK STORES LLC PO BOX 469 CLINTON NC 28329 COSTIN BEVERLY C JR ANITA D 4814 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 DEVAUGHN CONSTANCE W 905 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 DIAKO CONSTRUCTION INC PO BOX 51965 DURHAM NC 27717 ENGLISH LISA 4821 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 FYLSTRA JONATHAN D LAURA K 1106 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 GRIFFIN M TAYLOR 4801 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 HANSEN DANIEL M AUDREY D 909 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 HOWARD BARRY E KIMBERLY H 914 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 HUFFER JASON E JANICE E 1480 KEISER RD WAVERLY OH 45690 JOHNSON MATTHEW ASHLEY 4825 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 KREPPS DANIEL L WENDY TALLEY 4810 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 LOCKLEAR LOGAN 905 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 LONG TIMOTHY S ROBIN C 4809 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 MARTENS JOHN W RU YAN 4806 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 MATZKE ERIC J JR PATRICIA A ETAL 4802 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 MCMANUS MICHAEL ETAL 10711 EDMUNDSON AVE RALEIGH NC 27614 MILLARD DAVID K BILLIE J 712 DUCK DOWNE CT WILMINGTON NC 28409 MOLINA BRIAN 1006 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 MORALES LUIS A 4649 NORWICH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 PARKER JOYCE STEPHENSON 1010 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 PIRANEO RYAN C 4822 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 ROBBINS DONNA 1002 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 RODRIGUEZ MELISSA 4802 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 RUSSO CASEY 2723 CHESHIRE DR BALDWIN NY 11510 SALAS ISMAEL GLADYS BEJAR 906 SPRING BRANCH RD WILMINGTON INC 28405 SANCHEZ ROSA R 4657 NORWICH RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SHELLEY CO LLC THE 4810 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 SIERRA PEREZ ARLENE 1102 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SMITH JOANN 4818 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 SMITH WM LINDA FLYNN TRUSTEES 4814 KINGS DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 STAUBLE ZACHARY A 4817 LORD NANCE CT WILMINGTON NC 28405 STRICKLAND BILLY M PO BOX 189 CAROLINA BEACH NC 28428 SULLIVAN LLOYD JACQUELINE 901 KINGS GRANT RD WILMINGTON NC 28405 SWINSON DOCK E MARJORIE 4821 SHELLEY DR WILMINGTON NC 28405 VAGNERINI PAUL BEVERLY 554 GRANDE MANOR CT #208 WILMINGTON NC 28405 WISE AMY LEE 917 WA[YgfUlrNi AbPrs-Augus",L:Mff�GTON NC 28405 ITEM: 10- 7 - 16 Oeslgn So(Utiolki Notice of Community Information Meeting May 18, 2023 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: 4801, 4805, 4809 & 4813 Shelley Drive My Client is pursuing permitting to build seven (7) new homes on land at the referenced addresses. A sketch plan of the proposed layout and improvements is attached. Your property is located within the proximity of the proposed project. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only a specific use, in this case construction of seven (7) single-family homes and proposed property improvements for driveways and parking, can be developed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within five -hundred feet (500') of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. An information meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 30th, 6:00 p.m., at Picnic Shelter #3, Long Leaf Park (north side of the park accessed from Pine Grove Road). If you're not able to attend, you can also contact me at Tel. # 910-620-2374, or email cwolf@lobodemar.biz, with comments and/or questions. We appreciate your interest and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. P.O. Sox 7221, WilmiKgtoK, NC 28406 * Telephone: 910-620-2374 * Email: cwolf@lobodeMar.biz Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 17 1R� i 6L s s j L Shelley Drive f l• ! 1 ! ! f� !I �i I! ! T V 4 r ij -' I '" 5 Lj j. Board of Com - Augus 2023 I -19 ROLINA HOMES CITADEL B-lI 6' EXTENSION MODEL J W wn O � 2 m _ Z -i W � Q Fll - U �T2 ROLINA HOMES CITADEL D-11 6' EXTENSION MODEL J W wa � O O xa a Z J .n W 00 c no 00 ROLINA HOMES CITADEL C-II 6' EXTENSION MODEL J W Na W � O 2 W J Q 00 T3 ROLINA HOMES CITADEL E-❑ 6' EXTENSION MODEL J W O 2O O� xW Q J Z W J � O El p0' - �T5 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 7 - 20 FIRST FELRoRrLiAUe-S u u 7L2A3PORCH s = I 2 'TO. LINEN W/5 SHELVES 14010 7T-Q7—LQ ATH � N M I �oFA VANITY KNEE 70 � SPACE E WALL , BED 2 scc :r 2 3050 2'-6" OPT. FP/ CHIMNEY 3050 —15'-2' MASTER BED ,ULTED CLG �,— VLT 12'-2" - 8-94" 2'-0" 3'-9 xn WI c N 2'-0', SO m >7 — x SO BATH N DWN n 1 16 J15 14 13 12 11 S&R O WALL _ — 10 — — e MOUNTED x HANDRAIL 24x54 42- HALF WALL a N ATTIC ACCESS `O 4 5 fi 7 8 9 N 00 BED 3 1 G N LAUNDRY D 12 -0 j" 3050 3050 X--8- 1 12'-4' 6'EXTFsfNSjQUSEGQNQ,a00R PLAN Concept Plan Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 8 - 1 n/f Me1155a Rodriguez D.B. G4 I G -59 Zoning: R-1 5 I Land Use: Residential n/f David Billie Millard D.B. 2045-2 1 Zoning: R- 15 Land Use: Residential n/f Daniel Wendy KreppS 1475-158G I n/f I Beverly "P 10 Zoning: R-15 Anita CoStin T ti� Land Use: Residential D.B. 1172-750 ti� I h` S 80°09'34° E Zoning: R- 15 I I .42' \' BLMSTeR 1 14"PINE Srt 79°32 27° E 71 .581 Land Use: Residential I I 116"PIN I 20TIN a'oAK "ENE 8„M �1 �� S 79°42'5?„ E 3� � rtC I0"MAPLE au E -99.9T d of"PANE 16PINE " 116" NE 80A OlLine to be \ I I I I Abandoned zo°PwE 4°Pwe 4°Pwe S 799_43'08" E en 14"PINE 4"PINE 12"PINE 'TINE 8 PIE 14"PINE tCbm �� ��� 2'PINE� Old Lot 30'PINE MA WE `1 02 I I I I INE P NE I O Op 14'PIN� 14PINE Abandoned ,INE I 10"M-E \ 95.00' P J _ S 83°22'45" E 12'PwE I 14"PINE N L 12"PINE 16"PINE / I I I I D- 'PINE _ 16"PINE 12PINE 12P 12'PINE j / 20"PINE ' O_ 4 PINE 4 P PINE 0 OAK O MA �a 54 12 50 I I I I 1 2"P I 8"O K 14"PINE 12"PINE 16'PINE ` 12'PINE AbOld Lot be PINE 1 1 Q + 14"PINE 14"PINE I NE 14'PINE 8"MAPIf GLUSTEPg MAGNOLA Line to to 14'T� - 2 INE10"OA �4"PIIV® �J • • - I 14'PINE 12"PINE I , 1 2 PINE 1 2 PINE PLE 1 2 OAK 811DWD �WIN OA 8, N� _N SL OAK 16"PIN �/ 1OPINE 7777 E 16"PINE 24PINE IOTWIN OARP EE 14"PINE"INE 12"PINE 16"PINE OAF18, WIN W 2' PIN - 54' 20"PW� OAK to 4"PIN 16"PINE � . ' /_ _ ic mI / / I 4 _ 8 OAK 14 PINE PINE 12 PI " INE 8'GUM I2"PINE 14"PINE 5 " N p Q 4" IT M14�Ar Lu 4P oQ v.i � �"MAPLE � I / � �Y I� 12;1IN12" AK 5LI' ���Py� 12"PINE 12"PINE 2"PINE 1 I 4 4 PINE 12"PI �� Lot - 10"OAK1 2'"PINE 1 2"PINE PINE 1 AK 1 2 PINE = Q 14"FIN \ E _ Z O U ZO PI E 1 4"PINY' 16'P'A` N MA NOLIA 8"O �. � 24PINE� �2' J I I 1 0 6 PINT 4"PIN �Q - 12"PINE t 14"PINE 16"PI E 8"TWIN 8"On MAGNOLIA 2 PIN 20 INE / O I i � K' Y2"PiNE \ o I _ I � OJT 14'PIN\ I \ \ N 1 / 14"PINE 14"PINE - 4 IV I Lot 12" INE 14"PIN \ 2"PIN I -�i� I L �aP'NE \ INE I Q ' 14"PINE \ 2 'PINE 4 1 12"PI E 6"PIN \ � I[PINI'4"" E g"'; ...',:'Ire MAPLE - � 16"PINFJ JNE 12'PIO5�G8 s.+.±' 12"PINE Lot ' 20"PINE 6' PINE \ I 20'PINE - I 46"PIN% - 14'TRIPLEO 12" Q PIN 12"PINL lo O in 12"PINE 14"PINE 596 f 14'PINE _ 5 2" t Lot + I 8"OAK I \ I 116"Ri II4"PINE 'n z6"PINE � � � I59G8 5.f.± 14" NE _ 8'OAK NE 14'IPINE'pI 7 Q \o NE I 59 s.f.± 1 - o '\. \ / 10"TWIN MAPLE I FINE I - 20.00 _ - I \ 59G5 s.f.± s°NIAGNouA � p L 3 I .52' \ �_ 2PiNE I 20A� 0--MAGNOLIA PIN 63} s,f. J� 1 4"PINE"PINEI 6"PIN\ \ I ,2'PwE N 34°3 3" W - 16"PINE PINE 12"PINE �' GLUST CH = 28. 5' 54' 4"PI 14'PINE ' - \ 4' 8 MAPLE ! 4" PIN I 14"P11f� --- 4 I 14"PINE - --, - 12"OAK 8"MAPLE CL'STER � 12"PI 1 _ �I 2"PINE 20'PINE ���N 79°43'00" w 2 54 _ _ 4°PINE 4 PI a PwE 4G.50' 54' - rIN1� E� 8"oAK 2"Pr'Ne _ � r T�NL Fire $ Life Safety Notes: I . Construction Type - 5E3 2. Houses will not have a sprinkler systems. 3. Additional fire protection and/or accessibility requirements may be required due to any special circumstances or changes concerning the project. Utility Notes: I . Lot is currently serviced by public water it sanitary sewer mains available from Cape Fear Public Utility Authority system. Service upgrades will be necessary. 2. All utility services, such as electric power, CATV, gas * telephone shall be installed underground. 3. Solid waste disposal will be serviced by privately contracted dumpster pickup. I I n/f Carolyn Brand D.B. 1500-4G n/f Belly Strickland D.B. 2402-989 Zoning: R-1 5 Land Use: Residential -_ 54' -----------� - 54' Sot� 4I = 14 1.49' - - helle --- -- Drive S200 15°CMP ---- -� (G01 P n/f Clark Stores, LLC Zoning: B-2 Land Use: D.5.427G-299 C-Store Stormwater Management Notes: 1. Stormwater management will meet County * State requirements. Total limits of disturbance will be greater than one ( I ) acre. A Land Disturbance Permit will be required. P.O. Box 7221 Wilmington, NC 2840Co Tel. 910-620-2374 Desgtq 50114 tt Okl�oardmmission , % - August 7, 2023 -1 51te Inventory Notes: I . Soils: Se (Segate fine sand) 2. This property Is not impacted by any AEC. 3. There is no evidence of Conservation Overlay resources. 4. This site is not impacted by any recognized historic or archeological significance. 5. No cemeteries were evidenced on the site. G. Existing regulated trees have been field located are labeled. No "Specimen" trees were identified. Mitigation - if necessary - will be completed during detailed design * permitting. 7. There is no evidence of jurisdictional wetlands. 8. There is no evidence of endangered species or habitat Issues on the site. 9. This tract is not impacted by any Special Flood Hazard Area as evidenced on FEMA Map 37203 1 4800K, dated August 28, 2018. 10. The site runoff will flow into the Smith Creek Watershed. Ub11C R/W) '-'Public Sanita =Sewer Main Publ�ater Main - n/f Diako n5truction, Zoning: 15-2 1 nc. Land Use: Offices i. G320-2074 Tree Preservation Notes: I . Tree Preservation / Removal Permit is required prior to clearing 4� land disturbance. 2. Prior to any clearing, grading or construction activity, tree protection fencing will be installed around protected trees or groves of trees and no construction workers, tools, materials, or vehicles are permitted within the tree protection fencing. 3. Protective fencing is to be maintained throughout the duration of the project. Land clearing and construction contractors shall receive adequate instruction on tree protection requirements and methods. 4. Label protective fencing with signs to be placed every 50 linear feet, or at least two (2) per area, in both English * Spanish "Tree Protection Area: Do Not Enter." Project No.: 23-1 G Scale: 1"=30' Date: OG/01 /23 Revlsons: Owner: Rolina riomes NC, L.L.C. 501 Bramson Court Mt. Pleasant, 5C 294G4 n/f The Shelley Zonin Co., LLC Zoning: [3-2 Land Use: D.B.3284-4G8 Offices Conditional Zoning District Concept Plan Case No.: Z23- N T RAfgLGA, RD KIN NORWICN P BRAMTON RD W E SN MANCNESTER DR 5 TERRY LN U z DEAN DR a N � pR SPRANG o p RIPLEE DR v o 0)z in MARTIN LUTNER Vicinity Map Zoning: R- 15 (No Scale) Land Use: Residential K ti 3 DR z c� N LORD z NANCE CT S DR Development Notes: I . All development shall be in accordance with the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. 2. Project shall comply with all Federal, State f- New Hanover County regulations. General Notes: I . New Hanover County Parcel Nos.: 3 14505. 18.G33 1 (4801) [PID R042 I G-020-005-0001 3 14805. 18.7239 (4805) [PID R042 I G-020-004-0001 3 14505. 18.8229 (4809) [PID R042 I G-020-003-0001 3 14505. 18.9238 (48 13) [PID P042 I G-020-002-0001 2. Tract Area: GO,240 s.f.± (1 .35 ac.) 3. Current Zoning District: R- 15 Proposed District - CZD / R-5 Minimum Lot Area - 5000 s.f. Minimum Lot Width - 50' Setbacks - 20' Front 1 0.5' 51de 1 5' Rear 4. Comprehensive Plan Classification: General Residential W Graphic Scale �I 5 e RD BERKLEY DR E • 20 10 • 15 30 _• Property Addresses: 4801 , 4805, 4809 * 4813 Shelley Drive Rolina homes - Shelley Drive, Harnett Fear Township / New Hanover County / North Carolina Public Comments In Support Neutral In Opposition Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 10 - 1 Dickerson, Zachary From: noreply@civicpIus.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 12:16 AM To: May, Katherine; Roth, Rebekah; Vafier, Ken; Farrell, Robert; Biddle, Wendell; Doss, Amy; Griffee, Julian; Dickerson, Zachary Subject: Online Form Submission #4310 for Public Comment Form ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The agenda items listed are available for public comment at an upcoming Planning Board or Board of Commissioners meeting. Comments received by 8 AM the day of the applicable meeting will be made available to the Board prior to that meeting and will be included as part of the permanent, public record for that meeting. First Name Ashley Last Name Johnson Address 4825 Shelley Drive City Wilmington State NC Zip Code 28405 Email ashler leagan(c�Vahoo.com Projects available for PB Meeting - Z23-13 - 4800 block Shelley Drive comment. What is the nature of your Oppose project comment? Public Comment Hello, I hope are all doing well. I wanted to leave the following comment to express my family's opposition of the rezoning of the 4800 block of Shelley Dr.. Recently it seems that every last wooded parcel of land in Wilmington is being built on. Not only that, but every square inch is being crammed with as many dwellings as possible. In this case, 7 houses on a piece of land where 4 is reasonable. 7 brand new cookie -cutter houses that do not fit in with the 70s & 80s charm and nostalgia offered in our wonderful neighborhood. 1 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 11 - 1 One of our main concerns is traffic. If each house has 2 vehicles, that is 14 more cars coming in and out of the neighborhood. The intersection at the front of the neighborhood is one of the busiest in town and this will no doubt add to that congestion. I am also keeping in mind the future road modifications and overpass that will be built in the coming years. I believe all of this will negatively impact the traffic on our already busy road. In addition, the start of Shelley Drive contains many large pot holes due to the BP gas station traffic. As a result, another concern will be the additional wear and tear on that section of the road due to the additional traffic. Another concern that we have is related to water drainage. We were informed by the builder that due to the amount of proposed dwellings, there would be a need for a ditch or retention pond behind the homes. Not only are these ditches and ponds unsightly but we believe that they can also be a nuisance and hazardous. One concern is a potential increase in mosquitos in our yard. In addition, during a meeting that we had with the builder, we had asked if a fence would be put around the retention pond, for safety reasons. I used the example of a child wandering off and ending up in the ditch/pond. The developer stated that she was not sure if they would put up a fence and in that situation they would pose the question of why was the child trespassing on the property anyway? My grandmother lives near a retention pond with no fence and last summer a 4 year old wandered away from his parents while they were unloading groceries and they found him later that night in the pond. Can you fault a small child in that case? I don't believe that this is a question of trespassing but of the overall safety of the children, and even pets, in our neighborhood. Accidents happen so I would hope that the builder would take preventative measures for everyone's safety and peace of mind. The size of the ditch or pond doesn't matter. It would not even be necessary if there were not so many dwellings being crammed into such a small area. In conclusion, we hope that you consider these points when making your decision. Thank you so much for taking the time to read our comments. We hope you all have a wonderful rest of your week! Upload supporting files If you need to support your comment with documentation, upload the files here. No more than 20MB in size total for all files. File types accepted are: doc, docx, ppt, pptx, txt, pdf, jpg, png. 2 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 11 - 2 File 1 Field not completed. File 2 Field not completed. File 3 Field not completed. File 4 Field not completed. Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 3 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 11 - 3 jo�ct�� ,� ,'- ��. My name is Joyce Parker; I live on Kings Grant Rd, right at the end of Shelley Dr. There is a constant stream of traffic on Shelley because of the Handy Hugo convenience store located on the corner of Shelley and N. College Rd. Shelley is also a main entrance into the neighborhood creating more traffic especially during the hour of 5 to 7 when residents are coming from work. 18 wheelers come down Kings Grant Rd on their way to Shelley and HH. They make wide turns at the intersection of these two street causing traffic to stop and endangering children on bikes. Just last week an oil tanker making a turn on Shelley actully ran into my yard and further down the street mailboxes have been damaged by these trucks makin a wide turn on their way to Shelley Dr. and HH. I realize they are using an easy route for them but it creates an unpleasant and dangerous situation on our street. To complicate things even more, people who drive 18 wheeler trucks park them on the shoulder of Shelley on weekends and holidays. Elderhouse has relocated at the end of KGR creating 1 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 11 - 4 a constant flow of mini buses. Adding potentially 14 more cars to this scenario would be a disastor for the residents of Shelly and KGR.AII considered I feel that it would be an unsafe and unwise decision by the planning board to grant this permit. z Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 10- 11 - 5 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:8/7/2023 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ken Vafier, Planning Manager CONTACT(S): Ken Vafier; Robert Farrell, Development Review Supervisor; Rebekah Roth, Planning & Land Use Director SU BJ ECT: QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING Special Use Permit Request (S23-03) - Request by Chris Baker, applicant, on behalf of the Sanctuary Church of Wilmington, property owner, for the use of Child Care Center at the approximately 7.47-acre parcel located at 6687 Carolina Beach Road, zoned R-15, Residential. (see page 1 of the attached staff report for a reference map). Note: This item was continued during the July 17, 2023 meeting. BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a special use permit for a child care center in an existing building on an approximately 7.47- acre parcel located on Carolina Beach Road. The property is currently zoned R-15 with an existing religious institution on site. The proposed childcare center would accommodate up to 60 children ages 0-12 years. The existing building would continue to operate as a church with the addition of the child care center for child care needs outside of traditional, ancillary care provided during church services and functions. No changes are proposed to the existing building or site. The Unified Development Ordinance allows child care centers by -right in most commercial zoning districts. Special use permits are required in residential and industrial districts in order to evaluate site specific conditions of a project. The property currently has right -in / right -out access onto Carolina Beach Road, an NCDOT maintained principle arterial road. As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate about 6 AM and 10 PM trips during the peak hours. The proposed use would result in an estimated 47 AM and 47 PM trips, increasing the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 41 AM and 37 PM peak hour trips. The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic I mpact Analysis (TIA). The 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Plan classifies the subject property as Community Mixed Use and General Residential. The Community Mixed Use place type focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi -family and single-family residential. The General Residential place type focuses on lower -density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single- family residential, low density multi -family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed with either place type, allowing site -specific features and evolving development Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11 patterns in the surrounding area to be considered. The proposed use would provide an additional community level service to nearby residential areas at a site that currently acts as a transition from the highway to adjacent low density residential uses. The Planning Board holds a preliminary forum for Special Use Permits. The purpose of the preliminary forum is for the Planning Board, public, and applicant to discuss and consider the request before it moves to the Board of Commissioners for a quasi-judicial hearing. The preliminary forum is not a public hearing, and the Planning Board does not make a recommendation on special use permit requests. There are four principal conclusions the Board of Commissioners must make when considering a Special Use Permit request based on clear substantial evidence presented at the hearing: 1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: • Intelligent Growth & Economic Development o Encourage development of complete communities in the unincorporated county ■ Citizens have daily needs met by NHC businesses and support them RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Example Motion for Approval: Motion to approve, as the board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report. [OPTIONAL] Note any findings of fact related to the four required conclusions. [OPTIONAL] Note any added conditions required for the proposal to meet the conclusions of law. [List Conditions] Suggested Condition: Conditions may be added to a Special Use Permit with the consent of the applicant. Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny, as the board cannot find that this proposal: 1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11 [State the finding(s) that the applicant does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met] ATTACHMENTS: S23-03 BOC Scdpt S23-03 BOC Staff Report S23-03 Zoning Map S23-03 Future Land Use Map S23-03 Mailout Map Application Matedals Coker Sheet S23-03 Application S23-03 Concept Site Plan S23-03 Staff Presentation COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) The board's decision to approve or deny an application for a Special Use Permit should be based solely on the competent and material evidence presented during the public hearing. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11 SCRIPT for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Application (S23-03) Request by Chris Baker, applicant, on behalf of the Sanctuary Church of Wilmington, property owner, for the use of Child Care Center at the approximately 7.47-acre parcel located at 6687 Carolina Beach Road, zoned R-15, Residential. 1. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. Before the hearing is opened, the Deputy County Attorney will provide an overview of the hearing procedures. 2. Deputy County Attorney Overview 3. Because the Special Use Permit process requires a quasi-judicial hearing, any person wishing to testify must be sworn in. All persons who signed in to speak and wish to present competent and material testimony please step forward to be sworn in. Thank you. 4. We will first hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and an additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 5. Conduct hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant' s presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's cross examination/rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) b. Close the hearing 7. Board discussion 8. Ask Applicant whether he/she agrees with staff findings. 9. Vote on the Special Use Permit application. Example Motion for Approval: 13 Motion to approve the permit as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report and additional evidence presented at the public hearing. OPTIONAL (if conditions have been identified that will bring the proposal in line with the required conclusions. Subject to the following conditions agreed to by the applicant: Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny the permit because the Board cannot find (choose all that apply): a. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located where proposed (for the following reason(s)): b. That the use meets all required condition and specifications (for the following reason(s)): c. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity (for the following reason(s)): d. That the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County (for the following reason(s)): STAFF REPORT FOR S23-03 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: S23-03 Request: Special Use Permit for a Child Care Center Applicant: Property Owner(s): Chris Baker on behalf of The Sanctuary Church The Sanctuary Church of Wilmington of Wilmington Location: Acreage: 6687 Carolina Beach Road 7.47 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R08200-002-028-000 Community Mixed Use, General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Religious Assembly Child Care Center Current Zoning: R-15 Residential ZONING R-10 0 R-15 0 523-03 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Residential R-15 East Residential R-15 South Residential R-15 West Residential R-15 S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 1 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 1 fit. � �5�'� ��� k � y�II� � �: �� �•.'�i� 'rr;�, ������ ��� �> s G'. r eft:—.: � �y���i■ :.�:�' ,.79• i ` n� S 3'v y�j rscrtfi"i1�®�fii�l' � t �` �rl ;r IiNu e {R ZONING HISTORY April 7, 1971 Initially zoned R-15 (Area 4) COMMUNITY SERVICES Site is currently served by CFPUA water and private septic facilities. If Water/Sewer approved, upgrades to the existing septic system will be required to accommodate the additional child care use. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire District, New Hanover County Federal Point Station Schools Anderson Elementary, Murray Middle, and Ashley High Schools Recreation Monterey Heights Park and Veterans Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation The County's Conservation Resources Map indicates the site to have no conservation resources. Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 2 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 2 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PLAN Existing Site Conditions • The applicant is requesting a special use permit for a childcare center for up to 60 children 0-12 years old from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM daily. • The subject site is located on approximately 7.47 acres located on Carolina Beach Road. • The property is currently zoned R-15 with an existing religious assembly structure. The addition of the child care use will require upgrades to the existing structure to meet the building and fire code requirements specific to child care centers. • The are no proposed modifications to the exterior of the site. • The site plan shows the existing location of the building, driveway, and parking area. The existing building will be used for the childcare center. • Site access is proposed through a right -in right -out access driveway from Carolina Beach Road. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R-15 zoning district in this area was established in 1971. At the time, the purpose of the R-15 district was to ensure that housing served by private septic and wells would be developed at low densities. • Section 4.2.1 of the UDC) allows for a childcare center within the R-15 zoning district, with a Special Use Permit. S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 3 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 3 • This facility is subject to a state operating license. According to the applicant, the NC State Division of Child Development and Early Education Consultant has viewed the existing building and recommended it as suitable for child care needs under the division's review standards pertaining to building size, indoor and outdoor space arrangements, and health and safety hazards. • One parking space is required for every 10 children served by the facility. Existing parking for the church exceeds the minimum required for the child care center. • The Unified Development Ordinance requires a special use permit approved by the Board of Commissioners to allow for the use of Child Care Center. • If approved, the project would be subject to Technical Review Committee and Zoning Compliance review processes to ensure full compliance with all ordinance requirements and specific conditions included in the approval. Only minor deviations from the approved conceptual plan, as defined by the UDO, would be allowed. S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 4 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 4 AREA DEVELOPMENT S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 5 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 5 TRANSPORTATION Site Access 1 N n o� Primary Access: s Carolina Beach Road o. J Glenarthi jj ° pave Sife - 0 �o 0 —Cypress-Village �laCe Seaview-Road CURRENT CONDITIONS Intensity of Current Zoning 20,000 SF religious assembly space PROPOSED ACCESS Primary Access Carolina Beach Road via a right -in right -out access driveway. Secondary Access N/A EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Affected Roadway Carolina Beach Road Type of Roadway NCDOT Principal Arterial Road Roadway Planning Capacity (AADT) 41,369 vehicles per day Latest Traffic Volume (AADT) 35,500 (2021) S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 6 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 6 Latest WMPO Point -in -Time County (DT) 36,509 (3/2022) Current Level of Congestion Near Capacity TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic Traffic Generated Potential Generated by by Proposed Impact of Present Designation Proposed Designation Designation AM Peak Hour Trips 6 47 +41 PM Peak Hour Trips 10 47 +37 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) The estimated traffic generated from the site is under the 100 peak hour threshold that triggers the ordinance requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). SUMMARY The proposed project is located along a NCDOT principal arterial road, the capacity of which is 41,369 VPD. The proposed project's peak hour traffic is below the 100 peak hour threshold requiring a traffic impact analysis. The proposed hours of operation are from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM daily. ENVIRONMENTAL • The subject property is not within any Special Flood Hazard Areas. • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area. • The subject property is located within the Lords Creek Watershed. • The New Hanover County Conservation Resources Map indicate no wetlands are present on the site. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class I (suitable/slight limitation) and upgrades to the existing septic system will be required to accommodate the additional child care use. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Context and Compatibility • The applicant will be utilizing an existing building and outdoor space for children. • The NC State DCDEE has reviewed the existing structure and recommended it as suitable for childcare needs under the division's review standards pertaining to building size, indoor and outdoor space arrangements, and health and safety hazards. • The surrounding development is predominantly single-family residential. The child care facility would provide an additional community level service to the existing neighborhoods in the area. S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 7 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 7 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use and General Residential The community mixed use place type focuses on small-scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi- family and single-family residential. Place Type Description General residential place types focus on lower -density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single-family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single-family residential, low - density multi -family, residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. The subject property is located along a major roadway corridor, Carolina Beach Road, with single family dwellings on each side. Within the vicinity along Carolina Beach Road are institutional and residential uses. The Comprehensive Plan classifies the property as Community Mixed Use, which allows commercial uses that support nearby residents. Analysis The General Residential place type recommends single-family and low -density residential development along with light commercial and recreational uses. This type of use would provide support services in close proximity to existing and future residential uses. The proposed use would provide an additional community level service to nearby residential areas at a site that currently acts as a transition from the highway to adjacent low density residential uses. S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 8 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 8 STAFF PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT: Staff has conducted an analysis of the proposed use and the information provided as part of the application package and has created preliminary findings of fact for each of the conclusions required to be reached to approve the special use permit request. These preliminary findings of fact and conclusions are based solely on the information provided to date, prior to any information or testimony in support or opposition to the request that may be presented at the upcoming public hearing at the Board meeting. Conclusion 1: The Board must find that the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. A. Site is currently served by CFPUA water and private septic facilities. If approved, upgrades to the existing septic system will be required to accommodate the additional child care use. B. The subject property is located in the New Hanover County Southern Fire Service District. C. Access to the site will be provided by a right -in right -out access driveway to Carolina Beach Road. D. The National Wetlands Inventory and the New Hanover County Conservation Resources Map indicate no wetlands are present on the site. E. The proposed use will generate an estimated additional 41 AM/37PM peak hour trips. F. The NC State DCDEE has reviewed the existing structure and recommended it as suitable for childcare needs under the division's review standards pertaining to building size, indoor and outdoor space arrangements, and health and safety hazards. G. A Fire Services inspection has identified required upgrades to the interior of the facility that will need to be complete prior to occupancy of the building for a child care center. Conclusion 2: The Board must find that the use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance. A. A Child Care Center is allowed by Special Use Permit in the R-1 5, Residential zoning district. B. The existing structure is in full compliance with the dimensional standards of Section 3.2.8 for R-15. Front and side street setbacks of 25' and 10', respectively, have been met by the existing structure. C. One parking space is required for every 10 children served by the facility. Existing parking for the church exceeds the minimum required for the child care center. Conclusion 3: The Board must find that the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property or that the use is a public necessity. A. The proposed child care center is located within a religious assembly in close proximity to several existing residences. B. The land use in the immediate vicinity of the subject site is mainly residential. S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 9 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 9 Conclusion 4: The Board must find that the location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. A. The subject site currently has a religious assembly building. B. The site is bounded by residentially zoned property. C. No known cultural or archaeological resources are identified on site. D. Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the subject site are residential. E. The Comprehensive Plan classifies the property as Community Mixed Use and General Residential. The intent of the Community Mixed Use place type focuses on small-scale mixed - use development that serves all modes of traffic and includes uses such as recreational and institutional. General Residential place type focuses on lower density residential, and recreation and school facilities are encouraged. The proposed use would provide an additional community level service to nearby residential areas at a site that currently acts as a transition from the highway to adjacent low density residential uses. EXAMPLE MOTIONS Example Motion for Approval: Motion to approve, as the Board finds that this application for a Special Use Permit meets the four required conclusions based on the findings of fact included in the Staff Report. [OPTIONAL] Note any additional findings of fact related to the four required conclusions [OPTIONAL] Note any conditions be added to the development: [List Conditions] Conditions may be added to a Special Use Permit with the consent of the applicant. Example Motion for Denial: Motion to deny, as the Board cannot find that this proposal: 1. Will not materially endanger the public health or safety; 2. Meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance; 3. Will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property; 4. Will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for New Hanover County. [State the finding(s) that the application does not meet and include reasons why it is not being met] S23-03 Staff Report BOC 8.7.2023 Page 10 of 10 Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 2 - 10 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Zoning/Use: N 523-03 6687 Carolina Beach Road R-15 Childcare Center n� o; oey Ct JQ�v Ereel� ro _men i eawa Subject Site g. e otn dgewc7t@r- hj3,R n ZONING 0 I-2 v 0 R-10 e tiie 0 R-15 S23-03 e' 0 500 1,000 S Feet Board of Commissioners - Augus 7, 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 ITEM: 11- 3- 1 Case: Site Address: ExistingZoning/Use: onin Use: Proposed Zoning/Use: N 523-03 6687 Carolina Beach Road R-15 Childcare Center d 0 o oey Ct epa s Q Ere �r er- f eawa Subject Site g e atn Fa ewater-Mhp-Rd a Future Land Use o GENERAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY MIXED USE ea i CONSERVATION cD S23-03 0 500 1,000 S Feet Board of Commissioners - Augus 7, 2 3 I I I I ITEM: 11- 4- 1 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Zoning/Use: N S23-03 6687 Carolina Beach Road R-1 S Childcare Center q- .... .. 171 �T \ \ I Subject Site o �Ypress lage u1f m S23-03 Parcels within 510 feet Board of Commissio ers AuPS 7, 2023ITEM: 1- 5 w - er-iurnp- rca ,T,SFa- _vi.ew Rd APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 1 10 "Imingtarb North Carolina 28403 Telephone (910) 798-71 b5 FAX f910) 798.70S3 pl anni ngdevelo pm eni.nhcgov.com SPECIAL. USE PERMIT APPLICATION This application forth must be completed as part of a special use permit application submitted through the county's amine COAST portal. The main procedural steps In the submittal and review of applications are outlined In the flowchart below. More specific submittal and review requirements, as well- as the standards to be applied to reviewing the application, are set out in Section 10.3.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 'Yf the proposed use is classified as intensive industry, the applicant shall conduct a community information meeting in accordance with Section 10.2.3. Casnmu fty Information Meeting. 1. Applicant and Property Owner Information ApplicantjAgent Name Owner Name (if different from Applicant/Agent) t Company Address ro.10 t,-aL &AA 11W City, Stale, Zip ;tktot 4j rZ _Phone Z- HY Email G r )"s. b-ow 0.7o? @i #%-./. to $ . Company/Owner Name 2 Address City, State, Zip Phone Email .. Page 1 of $ Board of Commissioners - Augu%e&Oise Permit Application — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 1 Z. Subject Property Information Address/Location Portal Identification Number(s) W uolf," tr" zi 9adzot? 6V Z-n��—vote Total Parcai(s) Acreage Existing Zoning and Uses) Future Land Use Classification I. Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative - Please list the proposed use(s) of the subject property, and provide the purpose of the special use permit and a i project narrative (attach additional pages If necessary). Church sponsored daycare facility. Providing affordable childcare for families in need. No change or alteration to existing footprint of building. 4. Proposed Conditions) 'please note. Within a special use permit proposal, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding zoning district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please fist any conditions proposed to be included with this special use permit application below. 'Staff, the Planting board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process that I meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance. N/A Page Z of 8 Board of Commissioners - AugustSbe lse PernkN Application —Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 2 "w 5. Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. A Traffic Impact Analysis (T1A) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be Included with this application. ITE Land Use; Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.) AM Peak Hour Trips: L5 PM Peak Hour Trips: 6. Criteria Required for Approval of a Special Use Permit A use designated as a special use in a particular zoning district is a use that may be appropriate In the district, but because of its nature, extent, and external impacts, requires special consideration of its location, design, and methods of operation before it can be deemed appropriate in the district and compatible with Its surroundings. The purpose Is to establish a uniform mechanism for the review of special uses to ensure they are appropriate for the location and zoning district where they are proposed. For each of the four required conclusions listed below, include or attach a statement that explains how any existing conditions, proposed development features, or other relevant facts would allow the Board of County Commissioners to reach the required conclusion, and attach any additional documents or materials that provide supporting factual evidence. The considerations listed under each required conclusion are simply those suggested to help the applicant understand what may be considered in determining whether a required conclusion can be met. Any additional considerations potentially raised by the proposed use or development should be addressed. # 1. The use will not materially endanger fhe public health or safety if located where proposed and approved. Considerations.- * Traffic conditions in the vicinity, including the effect of additional traffic on streets and street intersections, and sight lines of street intersections with curb cuts; • Provision of services and utilities, including sewer, water, electrical, garbage collections, fire protection; • Soil erosion and sedimentation; Protection of public, community, or private water supplies, including possible adverse effects on surface woofers or groundwater; or Anticipated air discharges, including possible adverse effects on air quality. Use of a daycare would not endanger public health or safety as current use sees much more than 15 trips/peak house. Sewer and water utilities already in place for use of daycare, no change or alterations needed or required. No change to building footprint or alterations to existing building. Page 3 of 8 Board of Commissioners - August*AW3)se Permit Application — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 3 i 2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications of the Unified Development Ordinance. No alterations, improvements, or additions will be needed or required for requested special use. Therefore, all conditions and specifications of the UDO will be met. 3. The use wM not substantioHy injure the value of adjoining or abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity. ! Considerations- • the relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development, including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of operation, etc.). • Whether the proposed development is so necessary to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community or County as a whole as to justify it regardless of its impact on the value of adjoining property. As there's no change to the existing structure on the property, the special g use will not injure the value of adjoining lots. Hours of operation of proposed daycare will not be different from hours of existing use of property. Page 4 of 8 Board of Commissioners - Augus$14aBR9se Permit Applkatlon — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 4 4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the plan as submi"ed and approved will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and in general conformity with the New Hanover County Comprehensive land Use Plan. �nsiderati�n , + The relationship of the proposed use and the character of development to surrounding uses and development, including possible conflicts between them and how these conflicts will be resolved (i.e. buffers, hours of operation, etc.). • Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives for the various planning areas, its definitions of the various land use classifications and activity centers, and its locational standards. No conflicts between land use plan. Land use will not be substantially changed from current land use. Page sof8 Board of Commissioners - AugusS,�IQBQQ�W Permit AppUcotton _Gated 02.2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 5 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Pleases verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial". If an Item Is not applicable, mark as "NSA". Applications determined to be incomplete must be corrected in order to be processed for further review; Staff will confirm If an application is complete within five business days of submittal. Application Checkrat 0 This application form, completed and signed 0 Application fee: Appficant initial • $500; $250 if application pertains to a residential use (i.e., mobile home, duplex, family child care home). 0 Traffic impact Analysis (if applicable) • The official TIA approval letter is recommended prior to this item being placed on the Planning Board meeting agenda. • The official TIA approval letter is required prior to this item being placed on the Board Of Commissioners meeting agenda. 13 Conceptual Site Plan including the following minimum elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, structures and other Improvements o For residential uses, this shall include number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by each structure; and/or subdivided boundaries. o For non-residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy, and the specific purposes for which it will be used. • Proposed transportation and parking improvements; including proposed rights -of - way and roadways; proposed access to and from the subject site; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas. • All existing and proposed easements, required setbacks, rights -of -way, and buffering. • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas. • The approximate location of regulated wetlands. • A narrative of the existing vegetation on the subject site including the approximate location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees. For site less than 5 awes, the exad location, species, and sized (DBH) of specimen trees must be Included. • Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the trod than the corresponding general use district regulations or additional limitations on land that may be regulated by Federal or State law or local ordinance. • Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed special use permit (Ref. Section 10.3.5, as applicable) 0 Applications for uses in the intensive Industry category must also submit: • Community meeting written summary • A list of any local, state, or federal permits required for use 13 One, f 1) hard copy of ALL documents and site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document/site plan. 0 One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans O For wireless support structures or substantial modifications, the elements listed on the attached checklist Page 6 of 8 Board of Commissioners - August�e&WlJse Permit Application — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 6 T. Acknowledgement and Signatures By my signature below, i understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the special use permit for which i am applying. I understand that the existing Official Zoning Map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I hove the burden of proving that the proposal meets the four required conclusions. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented In this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, Information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant/agent as listed on this application to represent me and snake decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant/agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application; and 4. Provide written consent to any and all conditions of approval. Signs of Property Owner(s) Print Names) - �% k' — Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name Note: ibis form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. The landowner or their attorney. must be present for the application at the preliminary forum and public hAgrim It an opplicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. if delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Page 7 of 8 Board of Commissioners - AugustfpWA3iUse Permit Application — Updated 02-2022 ITEM: 11- 7 - 7 Farrell, Robert From: Hannah Baker <hannah.baker0721 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 11:26 AM To: Farrell, Robert Subject: Re: 22-032563 ** External Email: Do not click links, open attachments, or reply until you know it is safe ** Mr. Robert, We are opening a Child Care Center that will be ages 2-5 to begin with a licensed age of 6 Weeks- 12 Years old. We are looking at 68 Kids to begin with and the hours of operation would be lam- 6pm. All meals will be provided by the family. Feel free to give me a call with any questions you may have. Thanks, Hannah Baker 704-224-1199 On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:52 PM Farrell, Robert <rfarrell@nhcgov.com> wrote: Good afternoon, This is Robert, Senior Planner with New Hanover County Planning. Wendell copied me on this last email about proposed child care at the Sanctuary Church on Carolina Beach Road. Before we get too far down the line talking about permits, can you send us a brief description of your proposed project? Like anticipated number of children, hours, etc so we can get a better understanding about your project? Thanks, Robert Robert Farrell (He/Him/His) Senior Current Planner New Hanover County - Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning (910) 798-7164 p 1 (910) 798-7053 f rfarrell@nhcgov.com 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 www.NHCgov.com Board of Commissioners - August 7, 2023 ITEM: 11- 7 - 8 1, 8f Commissioners - August 7, 2 ITEM: 117 8:- 1 a