Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 2020 07-13
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA Assembly Room, New Hanover County Historic Courthouse 24 North Third Street, Room 301, Wilmington, NC 28401 Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair I Patricia Kusek, Vice -Chair junathan Barfield, Jr. , Commissioner I Woody White, Commissioner I Rob Zapple, Commissioner Chris Coudriet, County Manager I Wanda Copley, County Attorney I Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board JULY 13, 2020 4:00 P M MEETING CALLED TO ORDER (Chair Julia Olson - Boseman) INVOCATION (Pastor Reddgo Long, Jr., Greater Morning Star Apostolic Church) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Commissioner Woody White) APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Approval of Minutes 2. Adoption of Resolution, Racism: A Public Health Crisis 3. Award of New Hanover County Fire Station 12 Hurricane Florence Repairs and Renovations Contract 4. Charge of 2020 Levy 5. Approval of May 2020 Tax Collection Reports ESTIMATED MINUTES REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 150 6. Consideration of PAG Recommendation 40 7. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -09) — Request by Middlesound LLC, to Rezone Approximately 3.35 Acres of Land Located in the 500 Block of Middle Sound Loop Road, Adjacent to the Middle Sound Loop Roundabout, from R -20, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Conditional Moderate -High Residential District, in Order to Construct a 24- UnitTownhome Development 8. Public Hearing NOTE: Petitioner Withdrew the Item Rezoning Request (Z19 -12) — Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, Raiford G. Trask Jr. Rev Trust, to Rezone Approximately 10.35 Acres of Land Located North of the 3300 Block of Paramount Way in the Northchase Planned Development, and South of Interstate 140, from 0 &I, Office and Institutional District, and R -15 Residential District, to R -5, Moderate - High Residential District 40 9. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -04) - Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, Trinity Reformed Orthodox Church, to Rezone Approximately 3.00 Acres of Land Located at 4725 South College Road from R -15, Residential Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in Order to Develop 22 Townhomes 40 10. Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -11) - Request by Lee Kaess, PLLC on Behalf of the Property Owner, Lester R. and Suzanne B. Edwards, to Rezone Approximately 2.18 Acres of Land Located in the 100 Block of Forest Lane, Adjacent to the Intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. 23rd Street, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) 0 &I, Conditional Office and Institutional District, to Operate a Personal Services and Office Establishment 5 11. Appointment of Voting Delegate to the 2020 North Carolina Association of County Commissioners (NCACC) Annual Conference 5 12. Appointment of Voting Delegate to the NACo 2020 Annual Conference 5 13. Committee Appointments PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON - AGENDA ITEMS (limit three minutes) ESTIMATED MINUTES ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS OF BUSINESS 14. Renaming of Hugh MacRae Park 15. Additional Items County Manager County Commissioners Clerk to the Board County Attorney ADJOURN Note: Minutes listed for each item are estimated, and if a preceding item takes less time, the Board will move forward until the agenda is completed. Mission New Hanover County is committed to progressive public policy, superior service, courteous contact, judicious exercise of authority, and sound fiscal management to meet the needs and concerns of our citizens today and tomorrow. Vision A vibrant prosperous, diverse coastal community, committed to building a sustainable future for generations to come. Core Values Integrity - Accountability - Professionalism - Innovation - Stewardship Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/13/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes BRIEF SUMMARY. Approve minutes from the following meetings: Regular Meeting held on June 15, 2020 Special Meeting held on June 22, 2020 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve minutes. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman CONTACT(S): Kathy Stoute, Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution, Racism: A Public Health Crisis BRIEF SUMMARY: Chair Olson - Boseman requested the attached resolution to be placed on the board's agenda for consideration. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Adopt the resolution. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 3 -2, Commissioner White and Vice -Chair Kusek dissenting. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION RACISM: A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS WHEREAS, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners has identified the reduction of Racial inequity as a critical priority and essential to effective and systemic delivery of health and human services in New Hanover County; and WHEREAS, the American Academy of Pediatrics states Racism is a socially transmitted disease passed down through generations, leading to the inequities observed in our population today; and WHEREAS, Racism unfairly disadvantages specific individuals and communities of color, while unfairly giving advantages to other individuals and communities, and diminishes the strength of the whole society through the waste of human resources, New Hanover County's collective prosperity depends upon the equitable access to opportunity for every resident; and WHEREAS, Racism has produced and perpetuates poverty through intentional and unintentional policies that create barriers to economic mobility; and is a social system with multiple dimensions: individual Racism that is internalized or interpersonal, and systemic Racism that is institutional or structural; and WHEREAS, Racism causes persistent discrimination and disparate outcomes in many areas of life, including housing, education, employment and criminal justice; and an emerging body of research demonstrates that Racism itself is a social determinant of health; and WHEREAS, social determinants, conditions in which an individual is born and in which he or she lives, works, learns, or recreates are key drivers of health inequities. For generations, communities of color have faced vast disparities in job opportunities, income, and inherited family wealth. They are less likely to have housing security, access to health insurance, quality schools, healthy food, and green spaces, all of which can undermine physical and mental well- being; and WHEREAS, it is well- documented that Racism itself has an adverse impact on health. Chronic stress caused by discrimination can trigger a cascade of adverse health outcomes, from high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, immunodeficiency, and accelerated aging, all of which are high in communities of color; and WHEREAS, in New Hanover County, the greatest disparity in birth weight is among minority newborns. In 2018, 10.3% of Non - Hispanic Black newborns had a low birth weight, followed by 7.7% Hispanic, and 6.4% Non - Hispanic White; and WHEREAS, diabetes affects minorities disproportionately. New Hanover County resident deaths due to diabetes were 5.5% Hispanic, 4.4% Non - Hispanic Black, and 1.8% Non - Hispanic White; and WHEREAS, prostate cancer affects minority men disproportionately as well. Deaths due to prostate cancer were 4.4% Non - Hispanic Black, 1.8% Non - Hispanic White, and 1% Hispanic; and Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 1 WHEREAS, microaggressions, defined as brief, commonplace, and often daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative slights and insults have been found to increase suicidal ideation; and WHEREAS, the American Public Health Association has stated that negative law enforcement encounters among African American youth and men are associated with depression; pregnant African American women experience stress related to the likelihood that their children will have future negative encounters with law enforcement. The homicide rate for African Americans is 12 times that for Non - Hispanic White; and WHEREAS, the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners stands with the New Hanover County and City of Wilmington Community Relations Advisory Committee, the New Hanover County Commission on African American History, Heritage and Culture, the New Hanover NAACP, the New Hanover County Resiliency Task Force, and all residents of New Hanover County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners believes that Racism has formed the basis for a public health crisis affecting our entire County and should be treated with urgency. This resolution calls upon legislators, health officials, and others in our community to research and analyze data, and make meaningful changes to dismantle systemic Racism. New Hanover County will seek to promote Racial equity through policies approved by the Board of Commissioners and will encourage other local, state and national entities to recognize Racism as a public health crisis and take action. ADOPTED this the 13th day of July, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair Jonathan Barfield, Jr., County Commissioner ATTEST: Patricia Kusek, Vice -Chair Woody White, County Commissioner Rob Zapple, County Commissioner Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 2 - 1 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Property Management PRESENTER(S): Kevin Caison, Facilities Project Manager CONTACT(S): Sara Warmuth, Chief Facilities Officer and Donnie Hall, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Award of New Hanover County Fire Station 12 Hurricane Florence Repairs and Renovations Contract BRIEF SUMMARY: In September of 2018, Hurricane Florence hit Wilmington and did damage to many buildings and structures including the New Hanover County Fire Station 12 located on Highway 421 N. Part of the roof was peeled off allowing water intrusion. After the building was cleaned up and secured from further damage, plans were developed to repair the damages done by the Hurricane. During demolition of the water damaged interior finishes many problems were discovered with the existing electrical, plumbing, HVAC and structural components. These issues must be corrected so plans were made that incorporate the needed repairs. The scope includes roof replacement, framing repairs, structural steel reinforcement, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, drywall, painting, carpet, ceiling tiles, and other finishes. Improvements have been made to the layout to make the building more efficient and functional. The final plans and bid documents were sent to our finance department and a Request for Bids was advertised on May 18, 2020. On Tuesday, June 16th, bids were received by four interested contractors and Sexton Construction Coastal LLC was identified as the apparent low bidder. Our architect has since certified the bids and followed up with a recommendation to award to Sexton Construction Coastal LLC (see attached). The base bid is $569,000 with an add alternate for quartz countertops at $2,000. The total contract amount would be $571,000 and the project will take 180 days to complete. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve award of construction contract to Sexton Construction Coastal LLC for Hurricane Florence Repairs to Fire Station 12 located at 3805 Highway 421 N. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 3 June 29, 2020 Mr. Kevin Caison Facilities Project Manager Property Management New Hanover County 200 Division Drive Wilmington, NC 28401 Re: Hurricane Florence Repairs, Fire Station 12 Recommendation to award construction contract Dear Kevin; Construction contract bids were received June 16, 2020 for this repair project. The bids received are presented in the attached bid tabulation. The base bid amount includes all work related to storm damage repairs. Alternate bid G -1 was received to provide countertops manufactured from quartz in lieu of "Corian" -type solid surface. Sexton Construction Coastal, LLC submitted the lowest bid, including when the alternate bid is accepted. We recommend awarding the contract to Sexton Construction Coastal, LLC in the following amount: Base Bid $569,000.00 Alternate G -1 $ 2,000.00 Total contract amount $571,000.00 Sincerely r John R. Sawyer AIA Enc; Certified Bid Tabulation All bids received. s2a1com 124 Market Street, Wilmington, NC 28401 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 1 910 762 -0892 New Hanover County RFB 20 -0420 Certified Bid Tabulation r Hurricane Florence Repairs — Fire Station 12 John R. Sawyer, AIA Bid Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Bids due at 3:00 p.m., virtual bid opening at 3:30 p.m. Single Prime Bid — Bid Tabulation Contractor Bordeaux Construction Port City Builders, Inc. Sexton Construction Coastal, Ten Nails Construction, Inc. Company, Inc. LLC License # 9266 4839 27362 78640 Acknowledge #1: X #1: X #1: X #1: Addenda #2: X #2: X #2: X #2:X #3: X #3: X #3: X #3:X Bid Bond X X X X Base Bid $705,000.00 $624,045.00 $569,000.00 $587,454.54 Alternates G -1: $2,200.00 G -1: $2,443.00 G -1: $2,000.00 G -1: $2,000.00 Unit Prices U -1: $0.05 U -1: $0.10 U -1: $0.25 U -1: $1.99 U -2: $6.50 U -2: $1.92 U -2: $8.00 U -2: $18.00 Statement of X X X X Assurances & Compliance Attachments A X X X X M/WBE Forms Attachment B X X X X Lobbying Certification Attachment C X X X X Lower Tier Certification Major Plumbing: Banks Channel Plumbing: Kelly Plumbing Plumbing: Kelly Plumbing Plumbing: Parlier Plumbing and Subcontractors Services, LLC HVAC: Harrelson Mechanical HVAC: Coastal Heating & Air HVAC: HVAC Star Plus HVAC: Gideon Heating and Air Electrical: Laney Electrical: Douglas Electric Electrical: Laney Electric Electrical: Del Vecchio Electric, LLC ALTERNATES G -1: Quartz countertops per Section 12 3600 UNIT PRICES U -1: $ /sf for alternate flooring adhesive per Section 09 0561 U -2: $ /sf for remedial floor coating per Section 09 0561 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 3 - 1 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Allison Snell, Tax Administrator CONTACT(S): Allison Snell SUBJECT: Charge of 2020 Levy BRIEF SUMMARY: According to NCGS 105- 321(b), the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners shall direct the Tax Collector to collect the taxes charged in the tax records and receipts. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: It is recommended that the board charge the Tax Collector with the 2020 levy. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 4 July 13, 2020 State of North Carolina County of New Hanover To the Collector of Revenue of New Hanover County: You are hereby authorized, empowered and commanded to collect the taxes set forth in the tax records filed in the office of the Tax Administrator and in the tax receipts herewith delivered to you, in the amounts and from the taxpayers likewise therein set forth, effective July 13, 2020. Such taxes are hereby declared to be a first lien upon all real property of the respective taxpayers in the County of New Hanover and all jurisdictions therein and this order shall be a full and sufficient authority to direct, require and enable you to levy on and sell any real or personal property of such taxpayers for and on account thereof, in accordance with the law. Witness my hand and official seal this 13th day of July 2020. Julia Olson - Baseman, Madam Chair New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Attest: Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board New Hanover County I, Allison Snell, Collector of Revenue of New Hanover County, hereby acknowledge receipt of tax books for all real estate and personal property for Cape Fear, Federal Point, Carolina Beach, Kure Beach, Harnett, Wrightsville Beach, Masonboro, and Wilmington Townships for New Hanover County. 6E&fa�� _V&_' A/ - Allison Snell, Collector of Revenue New Hanover County Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 4 - 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Consent DEPARTMENT: Tax PRESENTER(S): Trina Lewis, Collections Supervisor CONTACT(S): Trina Lewis SUBJECT: Approval of May 2020 Tax Collection Reports BRIEF SUMMARY: NCGS 105 -350 requires the Tax Collector to submit a report showing the amount of taxes collected. Overall Collection Percentages for May 2020 are slightly behind collections for May 2019. This is due to no enforced collection efforts surrounding Covid -19. The report for May 2020 in comparison to May 2019 is as follows: New Hanover County May 2020 May 2019 Real Property 99.30% 99.51% Personal Property 94.81% 95.06% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 98.97% 99.17% Total Collected YTD $170,044,151.80 $167,757,958.02 New Hanover County Debt Service May 2020 May 2019 Real Property 99.30% 99.50% Personal Property 94.85% 95.31% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 98.98% 99.19% Total Collected YTD $22,393,386.07 $22,039,937.94 Grand Total Collected YTD $192,437,537.87 $189,797,895.96 New Hanover County Fire District March 2020 May 2019 Real Property 99.22% 99.49% Personal Property 96.65% 95.39% Motor Vehicle 100.00% 100.00% Overall Collection Rate 98.99% 99.15% Total Collected YTD $10,702,500.92 $10,263,932.24 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the reports. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 New Hanover County Monthly Collection Report for May 2020 Current Year 2019 -2020 Scroll /Billed Abatements Adjustments Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined $ 146,571,779.81 $ (59,881.61) $ 10,162.95 $ 14,526,013.82 $ (281,695.63) $ 311,899.65 $ 10,460,370.81 $ $ $ 171,558,164.44 (341,577.24) 322,062.60 Total Taxes Charged Collections to Date *Refunds Write -off $ $ $ $ 146,522,061.15 146,267,473.52 764,024.66 10.06 $ $ $ $ 14,556,217.84 13,838,889.39 36,833.72 (1,207.57) $ $ 10,460,370.81 10,460,370.81 $ $ $ $ 171,538,649.80 170,566,733.72 800,858.38 (1,197.51) Outstanding Balance $ 1,018,602.23 $ 755,369.74 $ - $ 1,771,576.95 Collection Percentage (28.55) 99.30 1,096.05 94.81 $ 100.00 $ 98.97 YTD Interest Collected $ 178,103.03 $ 16,753.76 $ 83,419.67 $ 278,276.46 $ 5,480.97 $ 623,149.69 *Refunds $ 49,290.15 $ 13,878.16 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD 170,044,151.80 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined Scroll $ 1,459,819.12 $ 4,149,078.44 $ 498,544.61 $ 6,107,442.17 Abatements $ (9,775.49) $ (61,967.19) $ - $ (71,742.68) Adjustments $ - $ 1,124.60 $ (28.55) $ 1,096.05 Total Levy $ 1,450,043.63 $ 4,088,235.85 $ 498,516.06 $ 6,036,795.54 Collections to Date $ 473,190.76 $ 144,477.96 $ 5,480.97 $ 623,149.69 *Refunds $ 49,290.15 $ 13,878.16 $ 1,740.86 $ 64,909.17 Write -off $ (23,606.36) $ (177,620.98) $ (91,927.03) $ (293,154.37) Outstanding Balance $ 1,049,749.38 $ 4,135,257.03 $ 586,702.98 $ 5,185,400.65 YTD Interest Collected $ 86,809.84 $ 27,409.31 $ 3,363.61 $ 117,582.76 Total Prior Year Collections YTD 675,823.28 Grand Total All Collections YTD $ 170,719,975.08 * Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 1 - 1 New Hanover County Debt Service Monthly Collection Report for May 2020 Current Year 2019 -2020 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 22,393,386.07 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Motor Vehicles Combined Combined Scroll /Billed $ 19,340,467.56 $ 1,907,280.78 $ 1,380,066.07 $ 22,627,814.41 Abatements $ (7,901.94) $ (37,172.66) $ Adjustments $ (45,074.60) Adjustments $ 1,341.07 $ 41,158.30 $ $ $ 42,499.37 Total Taxes Charged $ 19,333,906.69 $ 1,911,266.42 $ 1,380,066.07 $ 22,625,239.18 Collections to Date $ 19,199,870.81 $ 1,813,449.19 $ 1,380,066.07 $ 22,393,386.07 *Refunds $ 910.33 $ 505.20 $ (19.55) $ 1,415.53 Write -off $ (41.42) $ (188.57) 186,028.64 $ $ (229.99) Outstanding Balance $ 134,987.63 $ 98,511.00 $ - $ 231,623.12 Collection Percentage 99.30 94.85 100.00 98.98 YTD Interest Collected $ 23,460.86 $ 2,152.06 $ 10,906.01 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD $ 22,393,386.07 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Total Prior Year Collections YTD *Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 2 - 1 $ 66,688.81 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined $ 125,664.51 $ 202,476.73 $ $ 328,141.24 Scroll Abatements $ (1,029.78) $ (5,312.86) $ (6,342.64) Adjustments $ 122.29 $ 122.29 Total Levy $ 124,634.73 $ 197,286.16 $ $ 321,920.89 Collections to Date $ 48,776.86 $ 12,780.69 $ $ 61,557.55 *Refunds $ 1,124.20 $ 1,503.62 $ $ 2,627.82 Write -off $ (10.41) $ (19.55) $ $ (29.96) Outstanding Balance $ 76,992.48 $ 186,028.64 $ $ 262,961.20 YTD Interest Collected $ 6,176.51 $ 1,582.57 1 $ $ 7,759.08 Total Prior Year Collections YTD *Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 2 - 1 $ 66,688.81 New Hanover County Fire District Monthly Collection Report for May 2020 Current Year 2019 -2020 Scroll /Billed Abatements Adjustments Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined $ 8,768,856.40 $ (1,902.44) $ 5,408.79 $ 1,224,296.64 $ 1,116.91 $ 201.15 $ 797,027.89 $ $ $ 10,790,180.93 (785.53) 5,609.94 Total Taxes Charged Collections to Date *Refunds Write -off $ $ $ $ 8,772,362.75 8,704,315.43 457.71 (29.25) $ $ $ $ 1,225,614.70 1,184,817.18 167.53 (129.33) $ $ 797,027.89 797,027.89 $ $ $ $ 10,795,005.34 10,686,160.50 625.24 (158.58) Outstanding Balance $ 68,534.28 $ 41,094.38 $ - $ 109,311.50 Collection Percentage 0.41 99.22 220.92 96.65 $ 100.00 $ 98.99 YTD Interest Collected $ 9,924.79 $ 962.10 $ 6,078.77 $ 16,965.66 $ 195.68 $ 31,704.43 *Refunds $ 791.53 $ 1,104.49 Total 2019 -2020 Collections YTD 10,702,500.92 Prior Years 2009 -2018 Real Estate Personal Property Motor Vehicles Combined Scroll $ 81,964.21 $ 227,667.50 $ 28,940.89 $ 338,572.60 Abatements $ (1,456.29) $ (3,455.20) $ (3.69) $ (4,915.18) Adjustments $ 220.51 $ 0.41 $ 220.92 Total Levy $ 80,507.92 $ 224,432.81 $ 28,937.61 $ 333,878.34 Collections to Date $ 22,975.18 $ 8,533.57 $ 195.68 $ 31,704.43 *Refunds $ 791.53 $ 1,104.49 $ - $ 1,896.02 Write -off $ (902.88) $ (8,873.07) $ (4,710.18) $ (14,486.13) Outstanding Balance $ 59,227.15 $ 225,876.80 $ 33,452.11 $ 289,583.80 YTD Interest Collected $ 4,618.24 $ 1,404.69 $ 145.34 $ 6,168.27 Total Prior Year Collections YTD 37,872.70 Grand Total All Collections YTD $ 10,740,373.62 * Detailed information for Refunds can be found in the Tax Office NEW HANOVER COUNTY Chair Clerk to the Board Date Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 5 - 3 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Partnership Advisory Group Leadership CONTACT(S): Chris Coudriet, County Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of PAG Recommendation BRIEF SUMMARY: The Partnership Advisory Group (PAG) and the New Hanover Regional Medical Center Board of Trustees (BOT) are recommending that New Hanover County enter into a letter of intent (LOI) with Novant Health and its partnership with UNC Health and the UNC School of Medicine. At its meeting Thursday, July 2 the PAG voted unanimously (21 to 0) to recommend a full integration partnership with Novant Health, UNC Health, and the UNC School of Medicine. At its meeting Tuesday, July 7 the BOT voted (16 to 1) to proceed with the LOI with Novant Health, UNC Health, and the UNC School of Medicine and further recommended the following based on discussions with county commissioners over the past several weeks: • Creation of a community foundation estimated at not less than $1.25 billion for the purposes of managing and investing net proceeds from the integration back into the community consistent with the county's strategic plan; • Creation of a New Hanover County revenue stabilization fund of not less than $300 million for long -term financial resilience to unexpected tax and fee shortfalls based on natural disasters, pandemics, economic recessions, and debt management; • Creation of a New Hanover Regional Medical Center stabilization fund of not less than $300 million to aid in employee transition and trailing liabilities from the New Hanover Regional Medical Center to Novant Health; • Creation of a mental health and behavioral health fund of not less than $50 million to address the most pressing issues in our community to include substance use disorders. The core team that has worked on this process for the better part of a year will present this item in detail to include a thorough review of the proposed LOI between the county, N HRMC, and Novant Health. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Approve the LOI between the county, N HRMC, and Novant Health to authorize development of a definitive agreement for board consideration in September or October 2020 that is inclusive of all items addressed during the presentation. The definitive agreement would be legally binding to further the goals of the healthcare system and the priorities of the community, and a final version would be shared publicly at least 10 days prior to a public hearing and vote of the Board of Commissioners on whether to execute the agreement. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 Approve the LOI between the county, NHRMC, and Novant Health to authorize development of a definitive agreement for board consideration in September or October 2020 that is inclusive of all items addressed during the presentation. The definitive agreement would be legally binding to further the goals of the healthcare system and the priorities of the community, and a final version would be shared publicly at least 10 days prior to a public hearing and vote of the Board of Commissioners on whether to execute the agreement. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved the LOI between the county, NHRMC, and Novant Health to authorize development of a definitive agreement for board consideration on October 19, 2020 that is inclusive of all items addressed during the presentation by a vote of 4 -1, Commissioner Zapple dissenting. Staff was directed to include the breakage fee of $25 million. The definitive agreement would be legally binding to further the goals of the healthcare system and the priorities of the community, and a final version would be shared publicly at least 10 days prior to a public hearing and vote of the Board of Commissioners on whether to execute the agreement. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION Approving the Letter of Intent (LOI) and authorizing the development of a definitive agreement between New Hanover County, NHRMC and Novant Health WHEREAS, New Hanover County owns the hospital, medical facilities and other assets then leased to New Hanover Regional Medical Center (NHRMC) to operate as a health care system governed by the County- appointed NHRMC Board of Trustees (BOT); and WHEREAS, certain industry trends, challenges, opportunities and related discussions as to the best course forward for NHRMC have led to the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners passing a resolution in September of 2019 to move forward in exploring potential future options for NHRMC through a request for proposal (RFP) process in accordance with State Law (N.C.G.S § 131E -13), and the BOT passing a corresponding resolution endorsing such County /NHRMC exploration in that same month; and WHEREAS, following these resolutions, the Board of Commissioners held a public hearing on October 15, 2019 to receive comments related to the resolution and also, jointly with the BOT, appointed a 21- member Partnership Advisory Group (PAG) that includes: nine community members reflective of the community's diversity of individuals and interests, five members of the BOT, five physicians as selected by the Physician Advisory Committee, and the NHRMC CEO and County Manager, to explore the best way to improve the region's access to high - quality healthcare; and WHEREAS, the PAG developed a comprehensive RFP that was issued on January 13, 2020 and received responses from six health care organizations by the due date of March 16, 2020 with a variety of detailed proposals, all which were well vetted by the PAG with analyses and input from financial, legal and strategic advisors to NHRMC and the County; and WHEREAS, at its May 7, 2020 meeting, the PAG unanimously narrowed the list of respondents from six down to three parties for further due diligence and letter of intent discussions per the PAG Charter (such narrowing was preliminary, pending further public input at the Public Hearing on June 22, 2020) and communicated its narrowing recommendation to the Board of Commissioners and BOT; and WHEREAS, at its May 18, 2020 meeting, the Board of Commissioners endorsed (in alphabetical order) the following respondents for further due diligence and letter of intent (LOI) discussions (such narrowing was preliminary, pending further public input at the Public Hearing on June 22, 2020): Atrium Health, Duke Health, and Novant Health; and authorized the County and NHRMC to have direct partnership due diligence and LOI discussions with each of these three organizations as part of this RFP process; and WHEREAS, in accordance with this Board of Commissioners authorization, the PAG and PAG Support Team engaged in further analyses of the Atrium Health, Duke Health and Novant Health proposals and the respective ability of each Respondent to meet the needs of the region and Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 1 advance healthcare accessibility, quality, affordability, and equity as outlined in each of the key goals and objectives tied to NHRMC's Strategic Plan, including through multiple virtual and actual site visits; and WHEREAS, this analyses included material due diligence by the PAG's independent Financial Advisor, Ponder & Co., who delivered a report based on its detailed review of the partnership exploration process, as well as an analysis of the financial consideration and affordability specific to each of the Atrium Health, Duke Health and Novant Health proposals; this report concluded that: "For each of the proposals provided by the three Respondents, Net Total Financial Consideration is within or exceeds the valuation range," and based on its analysis of "the financial position and capacity of each of the organizations, all three respondents are well positioned to fund the upfront cash consideration and capital commitments outlined in their proposals;" and WHEREAS, in accordance with the PAG Charter, the PAG and PAG Support Team also further evaluated the pros and cons associated with each of the proposals, together with the pros and cons of NHRMC continuing status quo, internally restructuring orjoint venturing; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners held a second public hearing on June 22, 2020 to discuss all six proposals and receive further community input; and WHEREAS, based on such further analyses, evaluations and community input, on July 2, 2020, the PAG unanimously voted in favor of recommending to the Board of Commissioners and BOT the following: 1. That each Board approves moving forward with negotiating a Letter of Intent for a proposed full strategic partnership as we, the PAG, believe this step preferable to continuing status quo or pursuing internal restructuring (SystemCo) or another independent or joint venture model at this time; and 2. That each Board approves focusing such Letter of Intent negotiations with Novant Health as the PAG's recommended first choice of partner, with its solid proposal and intended partnership with UNC Health and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine to enhance clinical services and medical education in this region; and WHEREAS, following the PAG recommendation and dedicated BOT research and information, the BOT approved taking the next step in negotiating a partnership between NHRMC, Novant Health, UNC Health and UNC School of Medicine and endorsed the establishment of a community foundation and allocation of funds to support NHRMC team and community needs. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, based upon the PAG's research, due diligence of all options available to NHRMC (including the proposals, status quo and restructuring), and final recommendation, along with the BOT's approval and endorsement, Novant Health's solid proposal and intended partnership with UNC Health and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine to expand the existing medical education and pediatric specialty services in Southeastern North Carolina if NHRMC becomes part of Novant Health, the financial report provided by Ponder & Co., Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 2 the Novant Health LOI summary, and the use of net transactional proceeds (Exhibit D in the LOI) that ensures proceeds are protected for the community in perpetuity, the Board of Commissioners desires that the County and NHRMC move forward with the execution of the Novant Health 1_01, corresponding further due diligence and drafting and negotiation of a definitive agreement with Novant Health; and NOW, THEREFORE, the definitive agreement must further the goals of the healthcare system and the priorities of the community, must include the use of net transactional proceeds (Exhibit D in the 1_01), and be subject to review and approval of the Board of Commissioners and BOT, with a public hearing held no less than 10 days after the agreement is made public, and then executed and implemented by NHRMC and the County, respectively; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the use of net transactional proceeds (Exhibit D in the 1_01) be included in the definite agreement, as stated above, and must include a clear, definitive outline of the use of all funds, keeping them protected for the community as follows: I. $300 Million NHRMC Transition Stabilization Escrow, with $200 million allocated to an Employee Investment and Resilience Fund (to support a beneficial transition from NHRMC's existing pension plan to Novant Health's retirement benefits plan and to support staff and provider resiliency and retention); and $100 million in a liability escrow (to finance any non - assumed liabilities, wind -down expenses, or tail coverage premiums); and II. $300 Million County Revenue Stabilization Fund to help protect local taxpayers from unexpected expenses like emergency response needs from a disaster or pandemic and economic downturns; for the retirement of voter and non -voter approved debt; to establish pay -as- you -go financing for certain capital assets and projects; to minimize tax and fee increases in future years; and III. $50 Million Mental and Behavioral Health Fund to address one of the county's greatest challenges, focused on substance abuse treatment programs, sustained grant funding for existing evidence -based programs, and expanded access to mental health services; and IV. Community Foundation, established by the County using the estimated $1.25 billion in proceeds after the above allocations, to benefit in perpetuity all New Hanover County residents, and — governed by a Board of Directors — provide funding to further the mission and strategic plan of the County, with the initial endowment supporting and promoting initiatives in the following focus areas: health and social equity, primary, secondary and post- secondary public education, community development, and community safety; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners approves of the Novant Health LOI by the County and NHRMC in the form summarized and presented to the Board of Commissioners, including the use of net transactional proceeds (Exhibit D in the 1_01), as the next critical step towards ensuring that both the current and future needs of our growing region are met as we would then be better able to fund and to timely implement advancements in healthcare accessibility, quality, affordability, and equity for all now and into the future; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County and NHRMC are authorized to engage in further due diligence, drafting and negotiation with Novant Health of the Definitive Agreement and other agreements, documents and arrangements ancillary thereto, which Definitive Agreement would then Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 3 be posted publicly and subject to review and approval of the Board of Commissioners and BOT before it can be executed and implemented by NHRMC and the County, respectively no later than October 19, 2020. ADOPTED this the 13th day of July, 2020. NEW HANOVER COUNTY Julia Olson - Boseman, Chair ATTEST: Kymberleigh G. Crowell, Clerk to the Board Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 6 - 1 - 4 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -09) — Request by Middlesound LLC, to Rezone Approximately 3.35 Acres of Land Located in the 500 Block of Middle Sound Loop Road, Adjacent to the Middle Sound Loop Roundabout, from R -20, Residential District, to (CZD) R -S, Conditional Moderate -High Residential District, in Order to Construct a 24 -Unit Townhome Development BRIEF SUMMARY: Scott Stewart is requesting to rezone 3.35 acres of land located in the Middle Sound community from R -20 to (CZD) R- 5 in order to construct a 24 -unit townhome development. The site is located directly east of the Middle Sound Loop Road roundabout. Due to its unique shape and proximity to the looping collector road, the majority of the site directly abuts Middle Sound Loop Road. It is approximately % miles from the Market Street /Middle Sound commercial node. Under the County's performance residential standards, the site would be permitted up to 6 dwelling units at a density of 1.9 du /ac. The proposed 24 units equates to an overall density of 7.2 du /ac. As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate slightly under 10 trips during the peak hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed R -5 development would increase the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 5 -10 trips, for a total of 12 -17 trips during the peak hours. The applicant is proposing six conditions be added to the proposal, including but not limited to, designing the site so that it accommodates the 500 -year storm, retains many of the existing trees, and limits vehicle access to right -in and right -out movements. The site has a triangular shape with two sides adjacent Middle Sound Loop Road. Attached homes like quadplexes, triplexes, and duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between collector roads and single - family neighborhoods. In addition, the applicant has agreed to several conditions relating to access, stormwater design, tree retention, and lighting. The proposed townhomes will also comply with the same maximum height standards of the R- 20 district. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as General Residential. This Place Type focuses on lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services. The 7.2 units per acre density of the proposed (CZD) R -5 district is within the intended residential density range of up to approximately 8 units per acre, provided for by this place type. The proposed (CZD) R -5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with residential densities outlined as appropriate for General Residential places. The property's proximity to a school, multimodal infrastructure and shopping center make Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 the site more appropriate for a project of this density, and it provides for the provision of a range of housing price points and diversity in housing types in the area. The Planning Board considered this item at their June 4 meeting. At the meeting, three residents spoke in favor of the item and three residents spoke in opposition (one representing several people). It was noted there were several additional residents opposed to the project in attendance. Concerns included traffic conflicts with Ogden Elementary, drainage, building height, and density. The Planning Board recommended approval (4 -2) with the following conditions: 1. The development shall be limited to one right -in ingress and one right -out egress. Left turning movements will be prohibited on to, and from, Middle Sound Loop Road. 2. The project's stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate at minimum a 100 -year storm event. The stormwater facilities may be located within the contiguous 0.72 -acre access, utility, and drainage easement. 3. In addition to the County's tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as illustrated within the conditional rezoning exhibits, unless: • The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water /sewer lines, stormwater, etc.); • The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or • The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents or general public. 4. All buffers and fencing proposed within the conditional rezoning exhibits shall be installed prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements. 5. All street and landscape lighting shall be LED. Street lighting shall be shielded in a downward direction, and the origination of the light shall not be visible. The street lighting location will be limited to within the street corridor and sidewalks. Landscape up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood streets, yard and parking spaces. 6. Construction ingress and egress will be in accordance with the vehicular circulation plan included in the conditional rezoning exhibits. Public utilities will be accessed from Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff concurs with the Planning Board's recommendation and recommends approval of the application with the agreed upon conditions. Since the Planning Board meeting, the applicant has updated the proposed conditions and added new conditions. The new conditions would require the stormwater facilities to be designed to accommodate a 500 -year storm, restrict construction traffic during the AM peak hour, prohibit vehicular access to the site from Pickway Court upon development completion, require the installation of a pocket park adjacent to the roundabout, and require repair of any sidewalk or curbing damage during construction. Staff suggested motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout /collector streets and the adjacent single - family homes. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the site is in close proximity to a school, multimodal infrastructure, collector streets, and a shopping center. I n addition, the design of the project will assist with limiting traffic impacts to Middle Sound Loop Road. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district (conditions 8 -11 have been added since the Planning Board meeting. Specific language has been modified for some of the original conditions which are italicized below): Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 1. The development shall be limited to one right -in ingress and one right -out egress. Left turning movements will be prohibited on to, and from, Middle Sound Loop Road in accordance with NCDOT right -in ingress and right -out egress standards. 2. The development stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate at minimum a 500 -year storm event. The stormwater facilities may be located within the contiguous 0.72 -acre access, utility, and drainage easement. 3. In addition to the County's tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as illustrated within the conditional rezoning exhibits, unless: • The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water /sewer lines, stormwater, etc.); • The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or • The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents, general public or residences. 4. All buffers, (specifically tree spading) and fencing proposed within the conditional rezoning exhibits shall be installed prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements on the property. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the buffers and fencing. 5. All street and landscape lighting shall be LED. Street lighting shall be shield in a downward direction, and the origination of the light shall not be visible. The street lighting location will be limited to within the street corridor and sidewalks. Landscape up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood streets, yard and parking spaces. 6. The development shall provide construction ingress and egress in accordance with the vehicular circulation plan included in the Conditional Rezoning Exhibits and limited to the right -in ingress and right -out egress. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the construction ingress and egress from the development property to accommodate minimum interaction with Middles Sound Loop Road existing traffic patterns until the construction ingress and egress is complete. All construction traffic thereafter will be required to utilize the right -in and right -out ingress and egress. 7. Public utilities will be accessed from Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court (originally included as part of condition #6 in the Planning Board recommendation). 8. The development shall restrict all construction traffic ingress and egress to the development during the AM Peak Hour when Ogden Elementary School is in session during the calendar school year, including Ogden Elementary School calendar events until the development construction is completed. 9. A Vest Pocket Park shall be located on the corner of the round -a -bout as an additional buffer to include additional landscaping and fencing in place of the guest parking for the developments Town Home Residences numbers 21,22,23,24 which shall be removed or relocated during site plan review. 10. Upon the developments completion of construction, the development shall ensure all existing road, curb and sidewalks damaged during construction will be repaired to county standards, including Pickway Court. 11. U pon the developments completion, no development vehicular access shall be permitted from Pickway Court, only a pedestrian connection is permitted in accordance with the conditional rezoning exhibit sidewalk plan. Additional landscaping will be installed as a buffer between the Pickway Court Access, Utility and Drainage Easement and the development. The only vehicular access permitted with in the Access, Utility and Drainage Easement will be the resident of 3618 Middle Sound Loop Road. Example Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout /collector streets and the adjacent single - family homes, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval with the agreed upon conditions as recommended by Planning Board and staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Denied 4 -1, Vice -Chair Kusek dissenting. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z20 -09) Request by Middlesound LLC, to rezone approximately 3.35 acres of land located in the 500 block of Middle Sound Loop Road, adjacent to the Middle Sound Loop roundabout, from R -20, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Conditional Moderate -High Residential District, in order to construct a 24 -unit townhome development. 1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout/col lector streets and the adjacent single - family homes. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the site is adjacent to a school, multi -use path, and collector streets. In addition, the restricted turning movements that are part of the design of the project will assist with limiting traffic impacts to Middle Sound Loop Road. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1 . The development shall be limited to one right -in ingress and one right -out egress. Left turning movements will be prohibited on to, and from, Middle Sound Loop Road in accordance with NCDOT right -in ingress and right -out egress standards. 2. The development stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate at minimum a 500 - year storm event. The stormwater facilities may be located within the contiguous 0.72 -acre access, utility, and drainage easement. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 1 - 1 3. In addition to the County's tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as illustrated within the conditional rezoning exhibits, unless: a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water /sewer lines, stormwater, etc.); b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or c. The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents, general public or residences. 4. All buffers, (specifically tree spading) and fencing proposed within the conditional rezoning exhibits shall be installed prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements on the property. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the buffers and fencing. 5. All street and landscape lighting shall be LED. Street lighting shall be shield in a downward direction, and the origination of the light shall not be visible. The street lighting location will be limited to within the street corridor and sidewalks. Landscape up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood streets, yard and parking spaces. 6. The development shall provide construction ingress and egress in accordance with the vehicular circulation plan included in the Conditional Rezoning Exhibits and limited to the right -in ingress and right -out egress. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the construction ingress and egress from the development property to accommodate minimum interaction with Middles Sound Loop Road existing traffic patterns until the construction ingress and egress is complete. All construction traffic thereafter will be required to utilize the right -in and right -out ingress and egress. 7. Public utilities will be accessed from Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court. 8. The development shall restrict all construction traffic ingress and egress to the development during the AM Peak Hour when Ogden Elementary School is in session during the calendar school year, including Ogden Elementary School calendar events until the development construction is completed. 9. A Vest Pocket Park shall be located on the corner of the round -a -bout as an additional buffer to include additional landscaping and fencing in place of the guest parking for the developments Town Home Residences numbers 21,22,23,24 which shall be removed or relocated during site plan review. 10. Upon the developments completion of construction, the development shall ensure all existing road, curb and sidewalks damaged during construction will be repaired to county standards, including Pickway Court. 11. Upon the developments completion, no development vehicular access shall be permitted from Pickway Court, only a pedestrian connection is permitted in accordance with the conditional rezoning exhibit sidewalk plan. Additional landscaping will be installed as a buffer between the Pickway Court Access, Utility and Drainage Easement and the development. The only vehicular access permitted with in the Access, Utility and Drainage Easement will be the resident of 3618 Middle Sound Loop Road. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout /collector streets and the adjacent single - family homes, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] STAFF REPORT FOR Z20 -09 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z20 -09 Request: Rezoning to a conditional R -5 district Applicant: Property Owner(s): Scott D Stewart, RLA, ASLA — Middlesound LLC Same Location: Acreage: Near the 500 block of Middle Sound Loop Road, directly 3.35 east of the Middle Sound roundabout West PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R04400- 008 - 001 -000; R04400- 008 -01 1 -000 General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped, Single - Family Dwelling 24 Townhome Units Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -20 (CZD) R -5 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single - Family Residential R -20 East Single - Family Residential R -20, R -15 South Ogden Elementary, Single - Family Residential R -20, R -10 West Single - Family Residential R -20, R -15 Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 1 Page 1 of 20 ZONING HISTORY May 18, 1970 The site was initially zoned R -15 (Area 3) July 5, 1988 Rezoned to R -20 (Z -351) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer water and sewer will be provided by CFPUA. Specific design will be Historic determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Ogden Ogden Elementary, Noble Middle, and Laney High schools Schools For more information, see the school data below. Recreation Ogden Park, Pages Creek Park Preserve CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 2 Page 2 of 20 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN Includes Staff Markups • The applicant is proposing to construct a townhome development consisting of 24 units. The units will be located within b buildings containing 4 units each. The buildings will be 3 stories with a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the same maximum height allowed in the existing R -20 district. The buildings will be located at minimum 130 feet from existing single - family homes, which exceeds the 20 -foot buffer requirement required between attached housing and single - family dwellings. The minimum setbacks from abutting single - family developments currently required in the R -20 district would range from 15 -25 feet. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 3 Page 3 of 20 • The UDO requires a 20 -foot opaque buffer between the proposed townhomes and the abutting single - family homes east of the site. • Of the 3.35 acres included within the proposed rezoning, 1.5 acres (45 %) will be improved with impervious surfaces and 1.85 acres (55 %) will be open space. • The applicant is proposing to design the stormwater facilities for the project to handle up to a 500 -year storm event (;z5 1 8 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). This exceeds the County's requirement of designing the facilities to a handle a 25 -year storm event (,:Z58 inches of rain over a 24 -hour period). • The applicant provided two preliminary /conceptual stormwater evaluations. The first, prepared by CSD Engineering, analyzed the 500 and 1,000 -year storm events using rainfall data published by NOAA (18.1 and 21.1 inches over a 24 -hour period respectively). The analysis found that "...the proposed stormwater management system will decrease the flow from the developed site to a lower rate than if the site was left undeveloped..." The second report, prepared by Cape Fear Engineering also found that the "Demarest Pointe neighborhood is expected to reduce runoff for not only the NHC required design storms but also the 500 -year (78.70 ") and 7,000 -year (27.7 ") storms." The second report also provided information regarding water quality, flood zones, and watershed characteristics. • The applicant previously obtained an access, utility, and drainage easement along the eastern boundary of the site which allows for the stormwater improvements to be installed outside of the area proposed for the rezoning. • The site is located near the boundary line between the Pages Creek and Howe Creek watersheds. According to the applicant, the stormwater outfall flows east towards the Queens Point subdivision and eventually to Pages Creek. �7 Includes Staff Markups A Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.1 3.2020 Page 4 of 20 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 4 • The applicant is proposing to retain several of the existing trees on the site. A tree survey provided by the applicant indicates that 95% of the trees located on the site will be preserved. r Middle Sound Tree to Be Removed Tree RemovallRetention Plan - Includes Staff Markups Access, Utility, • In addition to the above graphics, the applicant has provided many exhibits with the application which provide additional information on the existing property and proposed development, including recorded plats, architectural elevations, floor plans and vehicular circulation and parking plans. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • Under the County's performance residential standards, the site would be permitted up to 6 dwelling units at a density of 1.9 du /ac. The proposed 24 units equates to an overall density of 7.2 du /ac. • The site is located directly east of the Middle Sound Loop Road roundabout. Due to its unique shape and proximity to the looping collector road, the majority of the site directly abuts Middle Sound Loop Road. It is approximately 3/a miles from the Market Street /Middle Sound commercial node. This node contains several commercial businesses including, but not limited to, retail establishments (Publix and Big Lots shopping centers), restaurants (Odgen Tap Room, Smithfields BBQ, Denny's, Bojangles), personal services (Tame The Mane, The Corner Buzz, dry cleaners), specialty restaurants (Casa Blanca Coffee, Starbucks), and craft beer establishments (Fermental Wine & Beer, The Sour Barn). Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.1 3.2020 Page 5 of 20 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 5 • The site was rezoned to R -20 in 1988 in response to a small area plan for the area adopted in 1987. That plan, written over 30 years ago, has not been updated since then. Conditions in the County have changed including the availability of water /sewer infrastructure and an expanded roadway network which connects Middle Sound to the south via Red Cedar Road and Covil Farm Road, and to the north via Darden Road and Wendover Lane. Small area and other planning documents that have not been consistently updated over this length of time are not generally considered current policy documents and the 2016 Comprehensive Plan is the most current plan used to provide guidance on development proposals in Middle Sound. When current plans conflict with older documents, it is typical that the most recent adopted policy prevails. • The applicant provided a report prepared by JC Morgan, a real estate appraisal and consulting firm, which states that "the data indicates that proposed project would have no negative impact on the values of the adjoining or abutting properties." AREA SUBDIVISION UNDER DEVELOPMENT Winding Marsh Clay CrassinsJ Middle Sound Village V, Pages Garner Anchors Rend r Z20 -09 LL LL City of Wilmington a 1 Pages Corner 8 Clay Crossing 21 13 8 Middle Sound Village 44 16 28 L. f Windi rig Marsh 1G 4 10 w Anchors Bend 210 165 45 Tatal 1 299 1 1971 102 -Based or) Building Permits and Aerial Photography— Z20-09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 6 Page 6 of 20 TRANSPORTATION • The site is accessed by Middle Sound Loop Road, a NCDOT maintained collector road. • The project will be designed with interior one -way travel. Vehicles will enter on the northern side of the property through a right -in only driveway, and exit on the southern side of property through a right -out only driveway. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Page 7 of 20 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 7 • As currently zoned, it is estimated the site would generate slightly under 10 trips during the peak hours if developed at the permitted density. The proposed R -5 development would increase the estimated number of peak hour trips by approximately 5 -10 trips. • Staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for nearby sections of Middle Sound Loop Road. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips Existing Development: 1 single - family home 1 AM/ 1 PM Typical Development under Current Zoning: 6 single - family homes 9 AM 7 PM Proposed R -5 Development: 24 townhomes 12 AM 17 PM • Staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for nearby sections of Middle Sound Loop Road. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Location Volume Capacity V/C West of Red Cedar Road to 8,900 9,600 0.92 Market Street Northeast of the Roundabout 6,000 9,600 0.625 Middle Sound Loop along subject site Southeast of the Roundabout 7,200 9,600 0.75 along subject site Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 8 Page 8 of 20 • A group of local residents opposing the project, Middle Sound Lookout, provided a memorandum prepared by a Traffic Engineer (attached in the opposition materials) stating concerns about the Middle Sound Loop Roundabout Level of Service (LOS), conflicts with traffic generated by Ogden Elementary School, delays occurring at the Middle Sound Loop and Market Street intersection during the PM peak hour, and crash activity in the Middle Sound Loop community. • The applicant's traffic consultant, Davenport Engineering, prepared a Technical Memorandum to determine the potential traffic impacts of the project at the Middle Sound Loop roundabout and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The report found that the roundabout currently operates at a LOS D in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour. According to the report, in 2022 it is expected the roundabout will operate at LOS E in the AM peak and LOS B in the PM peak without the proposed development. With the proposed the development, the delay of the vehicles is expected to increase by 1.9 seconds in AM peak and 0.3 seconds in the PM, resulting in no change to the LOS of the intersection. The report concludes that "there is negligible impact from traffic generated by this development and no traffic mitigation measures are recommended." • In 2018, NCDOT examined the operation of the Middle Sound Loop roundabout and found that it was functioning at an appropriate Level of Service. Specifically, the analysis found that the average delay during the peak hours ranged from 10 -20 seconds, however, the review found the roundabout is approaching capacity in the AM peak when larger delays are typical due to school drop -off occurring. The review estimates that the roundabout will serve at an acceptable LOS until about 2027. • NCDOT has reviewed the conceptual plan and provided preliminary comments to the applicant. Overall, NCDOT is in agreement with the location and design of the proposed driveways. NCDOT further stated that the design provides for "excellent access management with limited right -in and right -out turning movements instead of traditional full movement intersections ", and that the nearby roundabout provides for u -turn type movements to accommodate left -in and left -out movements related to the site. NCDOT indicated that they do not have any concerns related to the development's exit access relative to the school driveways, and that no additional roadway improvements would be required for the project. • The proposed conceptual plan also includes the installation of a sidewalk network within the interior of the development. These sidewalks will connect to the existing pedestrian pathway along the Middle Sound roundabout, allowing residents to utilize the existing crosswalks on Middle Sound Loop Road. In addition, a sidewalk is proposed to be extended to the adjacent residential subdivision to the east. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 9 Page 9 of 20 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses • STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension) • Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1 -140. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project. • STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median) o Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5- foot sidewalk on the western side of the street. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 10 Page 10 of 20 V 'V404"! WIN 02 ' gi Traffic Impact Analyses iC X70 �� ♦ . OIL / 0� Ver! ~�! 1� v I cln� 1 + , -al b i it I,I�„� // : �f.r�pb� ... a • �'" �y��,'-r �_r "mob' Under RevIew %704W Under Draft Starbucks ■• !1!4 , *;:. �[f i �; O • ,�► ��'+�� ', Ste' � �" s OHIO ISTIP Project mill u��ra� .,•� -� '�— '��"�'��,�,>• ; �•.�`� �� r. iii 9 ♦ � ' , "''� �,�lr,� IMF !ISO '� ! /�`�' - ����� �t - ►,, p� .+�.�!� �► WX ..: �. ♦ �♦ ♦ a' � 11I ���. .,��.r�•�� � ►�. �_���er_A. _ !! _� �► i a1�.1� � err S _. r • STIP Project U -4751 (Military Cutoff Extension) • Project to extend Military Cutoff from Market Street to 1 -140. • The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022 /early 2023. • The project will also install a sidewalk and multi -use path along the extension of Military Cutoff and the sections of Market Street included in the project. • STIP Project U -4902D (Market Street Median) o Project to install a center median and pedestrian accessways along Market Street from Middle Sound Loop Road to Marsh Oaks Drive. The pedestrian accessways will consist of a 10 -foot multi -use path on the eastern side of the street, and a 5- foot sidewalk on the western side of the street. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 10 Page 10 of 20 o The project is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in late 2022/early 2023. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Development I Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Ogden Starbucks • 288 multi - family units • Approved August 14, 2019 1. Middle Sound West • Small office with 32 • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable employees • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a westbound right -turn lane at the site's access on Lendire Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Ogden Starbucks Development Status: Special Use Permit request under review. Proposed Development Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Ogden Starbucks • 2,200 square foot coffee • Approved May 10, 2019 shop with drive thru • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of an additional exclusive eastbound right -turn lane on Lendire Road at Market Street (improvement installation to be coordinated with the Military Cutoff Extension project U -4751 ). Modification of the signal timing at the same intersection to incorporate the new dual right -turn lanes. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: Complete, however the installation of right -turn lane will be completed with the Military Cutoff extension project. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 2 - 11 Page 11 of 20 SCHOOLS • Students generated from this development would be assigned to Ogden Elementary, Noble Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. • Six dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -20 zoning base density, and 24 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 18 dwelling units. • Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.1 1 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 5.8 (2.6 elementary, 1.3 middle, and 1.9 high), which is approximately 4.4 more students than if developed under existing zoning. Development Type • 20,000 square feet of Estimated Student Generation Existing Development Medical /Dental Office Total: 0 (0.1 elementary, 0.05 middle, 0.08 high) Typical Development • 70,000 square feet of Total: 1.4 3. Bayshore Shopping Center • TIA approved September 1 1, Commercial • 8,000 square feet of High 2019 Development Turnover Sit Down • 2022 Build Out Year 5 Zoning Restaurant • 4,000 square feet of Fast Food Restaurant The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of an additional westbound left turn lane on Bayshore Drive to Market Street • Extension of existing northbound right turn lane on Market Street from Bayshore Drive to the site's access points Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: The property is zoned B -2, which allows for this development by- right. Preliminary plans have been reviewed by the TRC. SCHOOLS • Students generated from this development would be assigned to Ogden Elementary, Noble Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. • Six dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -20 zoning base density, and 24 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 18 dwelling units. • Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.1 1 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 5.8 (2.6 elementary, 1.3 middle, and 1.9 high), which is approximately 4.4 more students than if developed under existing zoning. Development Type Intensify Estimated Student Generation Existing Development 1 residential unit Total: 0 (0.1 elementary, 0.05 middle, 0.08 high) Typical Development 6 residential units Total: 1.4 under Current Zoning (0.6 elementary, 0.3 middle, 0.5 high) Proposed Development Total: 5.8 under Proposed (CZD) R- 24 residential units (2.6 elementary, 1.3 middle, 1.9 high) 5 Zoning Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-12 Page 12 of 20 *Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes students attending out -of- district specialty schools, such as year -round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTECH. School Enrollment* and Capacity * * - 2021 -2022 Estimates *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-13 Page 13 of 20 Total Enrollment of Capacity of % of Funded Level NHC % School Assigned Assigned Capacity of Capacity Capacity School School w/ Assigned Upgrades Portables School Elementary 97% Ogden 605 579 104% None Middle 107% Noble 720 664 108% None High 105% Laney 2063 1903 108% None *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Pages Creek (SA;HQW) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) soils, however, the project will connect to CFPUA sewer services. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-13 Page 13 of 20 CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY • The property is a triangular corner lot with two sides directly abutting Middle Sound Loop Road. • Attached homes like quadplexes, triplexes, duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between collector roads and single - family neighborhoods. • Townhomes tend to generate less traffic per unit than traditional single - family homes because they are often occupied by smaller households (retirees or young adults without children). • The site is located across Middle Sound Loop Road from Ogden Elementary School. • The proposed townhomes will be three stories but are restricted to the same maximum 35- foot height that applies to the existing and adjacent areas zoned R -20. Representative Developments of R -5: • w i isi;� 0I now m. � r � Wrightsville Place: Indie Ice b� Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-14 Page 14 of 20 Representative Developments of R -20: Iq Princeton Place: Emerald Forest 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-15 Page 15 of 20 Place Types COMMUNITY ^MIX MIX ST k Hanover'Co�uny, Future Land Use General Residential Map Place Type Focuses on lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses Place Type should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while Description recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. The subject property is located on Middle Sound Loop Road on the eastern corner of the roundabout, across from Ogden Elementary School. The Analysis proposed project includes a crosswalk connection to the Middle Sound Greenway and close access to the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that runs by Ogden Elementary and will eventually provide a link to Ogden Marketplace shopping center. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-16 Page 16 of 20 /�6FF G GEN�IZESIDENTIAL �. Hanover'Co�uny, Future Land Use General Residential Map Place Type Focuses on lower density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses Place Type should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while Description recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. The subject property is located on Middle Sound Loop Road on the eastern corner of the roundabout, across from Ogden Elementary School. The Analysis proposed project includes a crosswalk connection to the Middle Sound Greenway and close access to the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that runs by Ogden Elementary and will eventually provide a link to Ogden Marketplace shopping center. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-16 Page 16 of 20 Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-16 Page 16 of 20 Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-17 Page 17 of 20 The property is designated General Residential, a place type common for areas with established residential neighborhoods. This designation provides opportunities for lower- density housing (up to approximately eight units per acre) and associated civic and commercial services. The Comprehensive Plan does allow for higher densities than envisioned for this area in past plans, specifically the 1987 Middle Sound /Ogden Community Plan, which sought to maintain its then rural character. The 2016 plan allows for densities higher than the 1.9 to 2.5 units per acre common historically in much of unincorporated New Hanover County for infill and redevelopment projects in existing residential communities. This change in county policy was made in order to reduce sprawling development patterns and support greater housing affordability in the face of rising land and construction costs. In the Middle Sound area, upgrades to transportation systems, Analysis sanitary sewer utilities, and environmental regulations (i.e., stormwater standards) implemented over the past 30 years have made residential densities over the 1.9 units per acre recommended in the 1987 plan both suitable and more sustainable The density of the proposed CZD R -5 district (approximately 7 units per acre) is within the intended residential density range of up to approximately 8 units per acre, provided for by this place type. Its proximity to a school, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, major shopping center and a main intersection (roundabout on Middle Sound Loop Road) make the proposed density and design an appropriate infill development. Single family homes with individual driveways would be less appropriate in this location as the roundabout functions as a transitional area between higher and lower intensity uses. Additionally, the proposed development would support a diversity of housing types and range of price points by providing smaller units. The proposed (CZD) R -5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with residential densities outlined as appropriate for General Residential places. The Consistency property's proximity to a school, multimodal infrastructure and shopping Recommendation center make the site appropriate a project of this density, and it provides for the provision of a range of housing price points and diversity in housing types in the area. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-17 Page 17 of 20 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this item at their June 4 meeting. At the meeting, three residents spoke in favor of the item and three residents spoke in opposition (one representing several people) It was noted there were several additional residents opposed to the project in attendance. Concerns included traffic conflicts with Ogden Elementary, drainage, building height, and density. The Planning Board recommended approval (4 -2) with the agreed upon conditions, finding that the application to be: CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout /collector streets and the adjacent single - family homes. The Planning Board also found APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the site is in close proximity to a school, multimodal infrastructure, collector streets, and a shopping center. In addition, the design of the project will assist with limiting traffic impacts to Middle Sound Loop Road. Conditions: 1 . The development shall be limited to one right -in ingress and one right -out egress. Left turning movements will be prohibited on to, and from, Middle Sound Loop Road. 2. The project's stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate at minimum a 100 - year storm event. The stormwater facilities may be located within the contiguous 0.72 - acre access, utility, and drainage easement. 3. In addition to the County's tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as illustrated within the conditional rezoning exhibits, unless: a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water /sewer lines, stormwater, etc.); b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or c. The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents or general public. 4. All buffers and fencing proposed within the conditional rezoning exhibits shall be installed prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements. 5. All street and landscape lighting shall be LED. Street lighting shall be shielded in a downward direction, and the origination of the light shall not be visible. The street lighting location will be limited to within the street corridor and sidewalks. Landscape up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood streets, yard and parking spaces. b. Construction ingress and egress will be in accordance with the vehicular circulation plan included in the conditional rezoning exhibits. Public utilities will be accessed from Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-18 Page 18 of 20 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the Planning Board's recommendation and recommends approval of the application with the agreed upon conditions. Since the Planning Board meeting, the applicant has updated the proposed conditions and added new conditions. The new conditions would require the stormwater facilities to be designed to accommodate a 500 -year storm, restrict construction traffic during the AM peak hour, prohibit vehicular access to the site from Pickway Court upon development completion, require the installation of a pocket park adjacent to the roundabout, and require repair of any sidewalks or curbing damage during construction. Staff suggested motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting round about/col lector streets and the adjacent single - family homes. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the site is adjacent to a school, multi -use path, and collector streets. In addition, the restricted turning movements that are part of the design of the project will assist with limiting traffic impacts to Middle Sound Loop Road. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district (conditions 8-11 have been added since the Planning Board meeting. Specific language has been modified for some of the original conditions which are italicized below): 1. The development shall be limited to one right -in ingress and one right -out egress. Left turning movements will be prohibited on to, and from, Middle Sound Loop Road in accordance with NCDOT right -in ingress and right -out egress standards. 2. The development stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate at minimum a 500 -year storm event. The stormwater facilities may be located within the contiguous 0.72 -acre access, utility, and drainage easement. 3. In addition to the County's tree retention standards, the property owner shall retain and preserve all trees as illustrated within the conditional rezoning exhibits, unless: a. The tree has been proven to directly affect the installation, or cause damage to, any required infrastructure (i.e. water /sewer lines, stormwater, etc.); b. The tree is proven to be dead, dying, or severely damaged; or c. The tree is in an unsafe condition that may cause harm to the residents, general public or residences. 4. All buffers, (specifically tree spading) and fencing proposed within the conditional rezoning exhibits shall be installed prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements on the property. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the buffers and fencing. 5. All street and landscape lighting shall be LED. Street lighting shall be shield in a downward direction, and the origination of the light shall not be visible. The street Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Page 19 of 20 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-19 lighting location will be limited to within the street corridor and sidewalks. Landscape up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood streets, yard and parking spaces. 6. The development shall provide construction ingress and egress in accordance with the vehicular circulation plan included in the Conditional Rezoning Exhibits and limited to the right -in ingress and right -out egress. The development shall be permitted to utilize the access, utility and drainage easement from Pickway Court to mobilize construction equipment, construction materials and construction personnel to install the construction ingress and egress from the development property to accommodate minimum interaction with Middles Sound Loop Road existing traffic patterns until the construction ingress and egress is complete. All construction traffic thereafter will be required to utilize the right -in and right -out ingress and egress. 7. Public utilities will be accessed from Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court (originally included as part of condition #6 in the Planning Board recommendation). 8. The development shall restrict all construction traffic ingress and egress to the development during the AM Peak Hour when Ogden Elementary School is in session during the calendar school year, including Ogden Elementary School calendar events until the development construction is completed. 9. A Vest Pocket Park shall be located on the corner of the round -a -bout as an additional buffer to include additional landscaping and fencing in place of the guest parking for the developments Town Home Residences numbers 21,22,23,24 which shall be removed or relocated during site plan review. 10. Upon the developments completion of construction, the development shall ensure all existing road, curb and sidewalks damaged during construction will be repaired to county standards, including Pickway Court. 11. Upon the developments completion, no development vehicular access shall be permitted from Pickway Court, only a pedestrian connection is permitted in accordance with the conditional rezoning exhibit sidewalk plan. Additional landscaping will be installed as a buffer between the Pickway Court Access, Utility and Drainage Easement and the development. The only vehicular access permitted with in the Access, Utility and Drainage Easement will be the resident of 3618 Middle Sound Loop Road. Example Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed provides for a diversity of housing types in the area, and it provides appropriate transitional infill development between the abutting roundabout /collector streets and the adjacent single - family homes, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z20 -09 Staff Report PB 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -2-20 Page 20 of 20 Case: Site Address: Z20 -09 500 block Middle Sound Loop Rd 403 41 T-_ 06' ( • 402 • /342 • (338 • q ;334 419 • 415 410 • 3637 • 500 / Feet ❑ Neigh Existing Zoning /Use: R -20 /Undeveloped Proposed Use /Zoning: (CZD) R -5/ Townhomes N 402 :404 \0 112 C4 • 1\ O�V 7108 71\05 7.107 • • '414 • • 104 7,101 7100 C • 7,101 • • 7100 • 535 MIDDLE•SOUND LOOP•RD 509 • /520 528 •608 • Subject Site 501 \ • 1 102 100 101 )4 • 103 ;t • X105 \ Q\ 3608 3617 • /• •613 •5 3609 • 3605 /1, 134 130 126 138 • • •122 • �- BRANDY • 118 oners - :7 - -1/ 246 /• • 0', B -2 � •� R -20 CITY EDZD R -10 ;, Site R -15 R -20S �'�W'BEDFORn�L / L� ��•DR• Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use /Zoning: Z20 -09 500 block R -20 /Undeveloped (CZD) R -5/ Middle Sound Loop Rd Townhomes N CZD R -15� EDZD i ` Subject Site A Q' MiDDLEiSOUND- LOOP-RD., — .��-KERBY-\N ►' y � . R * W;BEDFp Q RD R -20 'RD Zoning Districts � ' . A -1 U EDZD PD R -20S SC R -10 AR I -1 R -10 E] R -7 B -1 1 -2 R -15 RA •B►ANDk, B -2 U 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) D Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) 500 •Yi� ��O COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Feet Boa of Commissioners - QI , 2020 �� n Incorporated Areas ti SHOD ITEM: 7 - 4 - Case: Site Address: Z20 -09 500 block Middle Sound Loop Rd CT 500 Feet Existing Zoning /Use: R -20 /Undeveloped Subject Site .BRAND oners - CONSERVATION Proposed Use /Zoning: (CZD) R -5/ Townhomes MIDDLESOUND LOOP•RD GENERALI RESIDENTIAL ���DO �Q BEDFORD, Place Types ■ COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ■ URBAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY MIXED USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (910) 798 -7053 plan ningdevelopment.nheg ov.com CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT Application Applicant/Agent In €orrna;ion Property Owner(s) If different than ApplicantlAgenf Name Owner Name Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Company Owner Name 2 Midd(esound LLC Address Address 6933 Running Brook Terrace City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Wilmington, North Carolina Phone Phone 910 - 231 -2428 Email Email scottstewart6933 @yahoo.com Subject Property Information Address/Location 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road Parcel Identification Number(s) R04400 -008- 001- 000;R04400- 008 -011 -000 Total Parcel(s) Acreage 3.35 Existing Zoning and Use(s) R -20: one single family residence Future Land Use Classification CZ -R -5 Application Only) Case Number Daat�eJTim received: Received bar: Zza - °9l f -a Zo2a �S Page 3 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 52017 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Proposed Zoning, use(s), & Narrative CZ-R-5 3.35 Proposed Conditional Zoning District, Total Acreage of Proposed District: Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). See Attached Proposed Condition(s) I Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff,the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See Attached Page 4 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 2 Proposed Zoning, Use and Narrative Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 3 D E M A R E S T POLITE N A R R A T I V E Middlesound LLC is requesting a Conditional Rezoning request to allow the currently zoned R -20 designation to Conditional Rezoning R -5 Residential District Designation (CZ -R -5) in accordance with New Hanover County's Unified Development Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan for 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road (3.35 acres). The Conditional Rezoning request from R -20 to CZ -R -5 will provide the opportunity to create a neighborhood program of twenty -four townhomes woven within the fabric of the existing properties features exemplifying sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity to been known as Demarest Pointe. The properties are being designed developed by Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA of Middlesound LLC whom has resided in the Middle Sound area since 1994 and has design developed Demarest Landing and Demarest Village neighborhoods (1993 — 2009) and resides in Demarest Landing. The townhome residence program will be built by Dave Spetrino PBC Design Build. Dave was the first Builder invited to build the Demarest Village neighborhood in 1999 involving Townhomes, Row Homes and Charleston Side Homes. Dave and Scott are excited to join for a collaboration to realize the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. Since the commencement of assembling the land holdings from 2004 — 2006 and in preparation for the future development 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road, Middlesound LLC in 2009 assigned easement entitlements for access, utilities and stormwater drainage on adjacent properties to the south along Pickway Court, all owned by Middlesound LLC. The easement entitlements (approximately .72 acres) are adjacent to and exclusively support the access, utilities and stormwater drainage regarding the proposed 3.35 acres rezoning request for CZ- R -5R -5. A total of 4.07 acres support the proposed improvement program for the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The properties are at an average elevation of +27, natural drainage is to the east to an existing drainage system, there are no wetlands present, the properties are not in a flood zone and are serviced by all required utilities. The properties have been managed over the past decade incorporating tree spading trees, erecting a fence buffer along the easement entitlements on the adjacent Pickway Court homes, preparing several trees for future relocation within the properties and maintaining the existing drainage systems. After several years of exploring alternative designs, "Demarest Pointe" neighborhood evolved with a priority to achieve sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity. Demarest Pointe achieves preservation of 95 % of the existing 846 trees on the properties (2 " -20" DBH ... diameter at breast height) which include 75% tree retention of the existing Protected Trees (8 " -24" DBH). Demarest Pointe townhome residence program provides diversity for housing choices for the Middle Sound Community and is supported by a stormwater program sculpted in a park setting that will exceed a 100 year storm event which has been evaluated by CSD Engineering. The stormwater program will provide all stormwater created by the new improvements will be managed within the 4.07 acres provided to support the new improvements ensuring stormwater runoff from Demarest Pointe 4.07 acres will equal the existing stormwater runoff before Demarest Pointe was developed. Demarest Pointe is uniquely positioned at the confluence of Middle Sound Loop Road and Darden Road Round -A -Bout, across from Ogden Elementary School and at the apex of pedestrian connectivity routes with direct access to the Middle Sound Multi Use Path that will soon connect to Market Street, Wrightsville Beach and Marsh Oaks in Porters Neck. The neighborhood program will provide minimum traffic impacts to the Middle Sound Loop Road corridor as reviewed by NCDOT with 3 trips entering - 9 trips exiting, am and 10 trips entering - 6 trips exiting, pm in accordance with the required compliance to Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 4 The Demarest Pointe neighborhood provides a total of 24 Townhome Residences arranged in six (6) buildings with four (4) residences per building, each 1,700 sq ft., 3 bedroom, 3' /z baths with a one car garage. The residences are positioned on two well defined one way "courtyard" streets with parallel parking, sidewalks and landscape islands minimizing impervious coverage. Each residence has a service alley and additional parking. Demarest Pointe is surrounded by the existing forest canopy for the entire perimeter of the neighborhood. There is an extensive Demarest Pointe neighborhood sidewalk network that provides access to the Demarest Pointe Post Office, Demarest Pointe Park, Pickway Court, Odgen Elementary School and the Middlesound Loop Multi Use Path. Each residence will be approximately 1,700 sq. ft., 3- bedroom with the first -floor bedroom as a home office option, 3112 baths and one car garage. Each residence will be serviced with an access alley that provides a driveway with adequate parking for one car and one additional car leading to the one car garage. Each residence will be fronting a one -way street with parallel guest parking providing one guest parking space per residence with five additional available spaces within the neighborhood providing 3.2 spaces for each residence. The only entrance driveway to Demarest Pointe neighborhood is on the northern property line along Middlesound Loop Road 475 linear feet from the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout pedestrian crossing. The entrance driveway will be twelve feet (12') wide with an interior driveway and street radius of 45' to accommodate all vehicles with vehicular circulation limited to a counterclockwise movement throughout the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The entire existing tree canopy along the northern property line of Demarest Pointe will be preserved along the street corridor of Middle Sound Loop Road except for the proposed entrance driveway and utility connections. The only exit of the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is located along the southern property line along Middle Sound Loop Road 400 linear feet from the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout pedestrian crossing and across from Ogden Elementary School. The exit driveway is 75' northwest of the Ogden Elementary School driveway for School Bus circulation providing adequate separation for visibility and safe movements for Ogden Elementary and the exit only driveway for the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The exit driveway alignment also preserves the existing forested perimeter buffer on Demarest Pointe directly across from the Ogden School Bus Ingress /Egress driveway providing no interruption on the existing conditions and movements of the school bus patterns. In addition, the entire existing tree canopy along the southern property line of Demarest Pointe neighborhood, across from Ogden Elementary School, will be preserved except for the exit driveway. Demarest Pointe Is located within the General Residential Place Types of the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan that states " The ideal density for multi- and single- family residential is low (ranging up to approximately eight units per acre) " and "Building height could range from one to three stories ". Demarest Pointe complies with the Framing Policies to "Promote environmentally responsible growth; Promote Fiscally responsible growth; Preserve and protect water quality and supply and Provide for a range of housing types, opportunities and choices ". Demarest Pointe has been designed as a Performance Residential neighborhood in accordance with the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance and section 3.2.11 Residential Moderate- High Density (R -5) District criteria with a "Density, maximum (dwelling units /acre)" of "8" [ 3.35 acres x 8 = 26.81 and "Building height, maximum (feet)" of "35 "'. As stated, 4.07 acres are provided to support 24 residences. Demarest Pointe will exemplify the spirit, intent of the policies for growth and development of New Hanover County and compliment the diverse character of the Middle Sound Community, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 5 Proposed Conditions Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 6 D E M A R E S T P 0 1 N T E The Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance pertaining to each individual development establishing the development apart and unique from other like kind developments. Essentially, this means Demarest Pointe's use, structures, layout, entrance, exit, buffers, tree preservation of the approved proposal can only be developed in accordance with the 25 exhibits submitted. C 0 N D I T 1 0 N S 1, The 3.35 acre subject property is triangular in shape located at the confluence of Middle Sound Loop Road, Darden Road Round -A -Bout across from Ogden Elementary School with 1,068.87 linear feet of frontage on Middle Sound Loop Road or 66% of the entire property boundary's totaling 1,620.45 feet is a unique property condition that requires a unique design solution to address connectivity. The subject property will be limited to one ingress access (entrance) and one egress access (exit) limited to right in and right out vehicular movements in accordance with the Vehicular Circulation Plan Exhibit 13, Exhibits 9,14,15,16,17,19,10,21,24,25. Adequate physical and visual improvements will be provided to prohibit left hand turning movements from Middle Sound Loop Road. 2. Internal Streets will be private, one way, counterclockwise vehicular circulation pattern in accordance with the Vehicular Circulation Exhibit 13 and Exhibits 9,14,15,16,17,19,10,21,24,25. 3. The 3.35 acre subject property is contiguous to a.72 acre Access, Utility and Drainage Easement for the exclusive use and support for the improvement program of the 3.35 acre subject property regarding the subject property's Access, Utilities and Drainage systems in accordance with all Conditional Rezoning Exhibits 1 -25. Collectively this provides 4.07 acres for improvements to support 24 Townhome Residences. 4. The 3.35 acre subject property will provide a stormwater program with a minimum design requirement for a 100 year storm event within the 3,35 acre subject property and the contiguous .72 acre Access, Utility and Drainage Easement, collectively realizing 4.07 acres to exclusively support the all improvements in accordance with the Conditional Rezoning Exhibits 1 -25. 5. The 3.35 acre subject property and .72 acre Access, Utility and Drainage Easement will retain, preserve all existing and proposed landscaping, landscape buffers and fencing in accordance with all Conditional Rezoning Exhibits 1 -25 and to the opacity requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance, in perpetuity. All trees to be retained, with the exception of utility requirements, are marked with one green survey ribbon, all trees to be tree spaded are marked with three green survey ribbons. All Buffers and Fencing, Exhibit 21, shall be complete prior to construction commencement of horizontal improvements. 6. All Street and Landscape Lighting shall be LED. Street Lighting shall not exceed 12' in height, shielded downward to ensure all illumination is downward, the origination of light will not be visible, all illumination shall be limited to within the street corridor, sidewalk to sidewalk. Landscape Lighting shall not exceed 42" in height. Landscape Up lighting shall remain within the internal Demarest Pointe neighborhood street, yard and park spaces. 7. Construction Ingress Egress will be in accordance the Vehicular Circulation Plan, Public Utilities will be accessed from Middlesound Loop Road and Pickway Court. Horizontal Construction is anticipated to require six months and all vertical construction is anticipated to require twelve months, unless delays are experience depending on weather, inspections and natural disasters. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 7 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. ATraffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. Multifamily Housing ( low Rise) ITE Land Use: 24 Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): Enter 3; Exit 4 Enter 10; Exit 6 AM Peak Hour Trips: _ _ PM Peak Hour Trips: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistentwith the New Hanover County Land Use Plan andthe Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) See Attached -- 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? See Attached 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? See Attached _ - - - -- - - - - - - Page 5 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application —Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 8 How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 9 How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) Demarest Pointe is consistent with the Future Vision ideals of the Comprehensive Plan by: "promotes the reduction of impervious surfaces (roadways) to reduce stormwater runoff', "provides access to "increase walking proximity shops and stores creates a healthier lifestyle" with Ogden Elementary across the street from Demarest Pointe and access to the Middle Sound Multi Use Path, in addition "Increasing the number of people on the street to enhance the security of an area ". Demarest Pointe also complies to the General Residential Place Type creating alternate choices for living. Demarest Pointe will virtually be hidden behind the existing tree canopy and rural atmosphere of Middle Sound Loop Road adjacent corridor through tree preservation program referenced throughout the neighborhood plan. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? Demarest Pointe is located within the General Residential Place Types of the Future Land Use Map and of the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan that states " The ideal density for multi- and single- family residential is low (ranging up to approximately eight units per acre) " and "Building height could range from one to Three stories ". Demarest Pointe complies with the Framing Policies to "Promote environmentally responsible growth; Promote Fiscally responsible growth; Preserve and protect water quality and supply and Provide for a range of housing types, opportunities and choices ". What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? Significant changes have occurred since the original zoning of the subject property to from R -15 to R -20 in 1988, thirty -two years ago, Middle Sound had only one ingress and egress out to market street, traffic control was limited to one stop sign, no connectivity, no sewer, lots were required to be larger to accommodate individual septic tanks and wells. Water was either through a neighborhood collection well system or individual wells for each property that could be accommodated in R -15, 15,000 sq. ft. lots or R -20, 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Fire protection had limited sources from available community water collection system or fire department water trucks. 1995 — 2000: Middle Sound Loop Road Connectivity: Red Cedar Road to Covil Farm Road to Military Cutoff; Kenmore Street to Brandywine Circle To Tree Swallow Lane (Gated- Emergency)to Red Cedar Road To Covil Farm Road to Military Cutoff; Darden Road to Wendover Lane To Market Street; Oyster Lane to Wendover Lane To Market Street; 2005 *: Middlesound Loop Road Widening with a bike lanes from Ogden Elementary to Harlendale Drive; 2008*: New Ogden Elementary School Facility built with vehicular circulation patterns for ingress and egress; 2007': County Sewer Installed; 2010 *: Middle Sound Loop /Darden Road Round -A -Bout installed to mitigate traffic patterns; 2012 *: Multiuse Path installed from Red Cedar Road to Ogden Elementary to Oyster Lane at Emerald Forest; 2017 *: Sidewalk Improvements from Ogden Elementary to Kenmore Street at the Brandywine Neighborhood (* Improvements are all immediately accessible, adjacent to and service the Demarest Pointe neighborhood) Existing zoning does not provide: for tree retention or preservation of the existing perimeter buffer of the 3.35 acre subject property; does not provide to limit ingress /egress for vehicular access, particularly left hand movements from and onto Middle Sound Loop Road to the subject site; the minimum standard for a stormwater runoff is a 25 year storm, The New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance and the 2018 New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan - General Residential Place Type Designation requirements that state: "The areas applicable to this place type are Middle Sound ", "Limiting cul -de- sacs ", " Building height could range from one to three stories ", "The ideal density for multi and single family residential is low (ranging up to approximately eight units per acre)', "Promoting environmentally responsible growth ", Preserve and protect water quality and supply" "Provide for a range of hauling tlpes, opportunities and choices ". Demarest Pointe meets all criteria. Boar of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 7 - 10 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial ". If an item is not applicable, mark as "N /A ". Applications must be complete in order to process for further review. Required Information Applicant Staff Initial Initial 1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application. x BS 2 Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An additional $300 fee must be provided for applications requiring TRC review). x S 3 Community meeting written summary. x V-5 4 Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). N 5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page reference of the property requested for rezoning. x 6 Site Plan including the following elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. • Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non- residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. • Development schedule including proposed phasing. • Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. x • All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. • The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. • Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. • Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance. • Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change Ref. Article VI! as a licable . 7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document site plan. x 8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. x Page 6 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 52017 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITFM- -7-11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURES By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. 1 understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1- Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this appli . n. Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Middlesound LLC Member - Manager S' t re of Prop y Owners Print Name(s) Signature of Applicant/Agent Print Name NOTE: Form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. �OX3N Y.'IV n � p r Z s2 Page 7 of 7 Conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-12 ado PLAN NHC CHARTING THE COURSE mw AUNTY. < RLI,FIV� L 11-6 boara OT t-ommissioners - jury -i, ITEM: 7 -7-13 General Residential This place type focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic and commercial services. Housing for the area is typically single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. Access to areas outside these residential areas are provided by arterial roadways, but still allow for interconnection between other place types. Limiting cul -de -sacs is encouraged to promote better internal circulation and minimize high - Volume traffic roads within the area. Types of uses include single - family residential, low- density multi - family residential, light commercial, civic, and recreational. The areas applicable for this place type are Middle Sound, Myrtle Grove, Castle Hayne, Piner Road, Porter's Neck, Gordon Road, Wrightsboro, and Masonboro poop. Pedestrian amenities should include sidewalks, street and shade trees, and open space. Building height could range from one to three stories. The ideal density for multi- and single - family residential is low (ranging up to approximately eight units per acre). Density within the General Residential place type may be limited by flood plain, wetlands, or other natural or man- made features and generally should be consistent with nearby communities. The following goals from Chapter 3: Framing the Policy will be promoted within the General Residential place type: • Promote environmentally responsible growth. • Promote fiscally responsible growth. • Increase recycling and reduction of solid waste. • Increase public safety by reducing crime through the built environment; • Integrate multi -modal transportation into mixed land uses that encourage safe, walkable communities, • Preserve and protect water quality and supply. • Increase physical activity and promote healthy, active lifestyles, • Ensure New Hanover County remains in attainment for air quality, in support of clean air and improved public health outcomes to support of continued growth. • Increase access to affordable and convenient healthy foods. • Provide for a range of housing types, opportunities and choices. • Revitalize commercial corridors and blighted areas through infill and redevelopment. • Conserve and enhance our unique sense of place to attract individuals, companies and organizations. • Actively promote high quality educational and diverse cultural opportunities for New Hanover County residents and visitors, PLAN NHC 2016 VISUALIZING THE FUTURE 5 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-14 3_ t € i t CCUNAFPCE ZONE 11) I . - E&!PLOYLfENTrENTER I GENERAL F2ES4OFJl7L4B URHAtl JAMEO USE _ ✓ i` _ - v CC"MAUM V..WgxcD USE RURAL RESMOMAL f The rttturc Land U. ,- Map is nor lepily handing Ilke the New Hanover CounS Zandgg Map it is intended !b Ge a q n ra ay rep eniabOn ❑ 11 v pea �i-X9 New HanoverOc.ur, :_v`ed hr the cW ns rho : � to �nt+�d � ®r vflh Plan f "14c. and will n_ vsi�tLq to guide [aura dEVelopm_nt cecisicns PLAN NHIC 2016 VISUALIZING Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-15 N Jnified Development Orclinanc:, New Hanover County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-16 NTY cc 1 r �7TS!r Buffers, but may not be reduced below the absolute minimum setback specified in Table 3.1.3.0.3 (by use of the language "in no case less than "). D. Performance Residential Development Performance Residential Developments are not subject to the minimum lot size, minimum lot width, and front, rear, and side setback requirements in the zoning district where they are located. Performance Residential Developments shall comply with the standards in this section and with all other applicable standards in this Ordinance. 1. Setbacks and Spacing a. Buildings on the periphery of a Performance Residential Development shall setback a minimum of 20 feet from the adjoining property line. b. Single - family detached dwellings shall be spaced a minimum of ten feet from each other, measured from the closest parts of the buildings. c. No multiple dwelling unit shall be located closer than 20 feet to any part of another dwelling unit. 2. Density a. In calculating the density for a proposed Performance Residential Development, the areas in subsections 1 and 2 shall first be subtracted from the gross area of land to be committed to development. In lieu of subtracting Dorovan, Johnston, and Pamlico soils, the developer may choose to preserve 100 percent of such areas as conservation space in accordance with Section 5.7, Conservation Resources: 1. All natural lakes, ponds, rivers, or marshes; and, 3 -4 New Hanover County, NC I Unified Development Ordinance Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-17 or Platted Lot in Residential District Zoning district Side Setback Rear Setback Building height (in feet) multiplied by 2.75, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 3.73, B 1 in no case less than 25 feet in no case less than 30 feet Building height (in feet) multiplied by 2.75, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 3.73, B 2 in no case less than 30 feet in no case less than 35 feet Building height (in feet) multiplied by 2.75, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 3.73, 0 &1 in no case less than 25 feet in no case less than 30 feet Building height (in feet) multiplied by 3.08, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 4.33, AC in no case less than 35 feet in no case less than 40 feet Building height (in feet) multiplied by 2.75, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 4.33, ! -1 in no case less than 35 feet in no case less than 40 feet Building height (in feet) multiplied by 2.75, Building height (in feet) multiplied by 5.14, 1-2 in no case less than 40 feet in no case less than 45 feet D. Performance Residential Development Performance Residential Developments are not subject to the minimum lot size, minimum lot width, and front, rear, and side setback requirements in the zoning district where they are located. Performance Residential Developments shall comply with the standards in this section and with all other applicable standards in this Ordinance. 1. Setbacks and Spacing a. Buildings on the periphery of a Performance Residential Development shall setback a minimum of 20 feet from the adjoining property line. b. Single - family detached dwellings shall be spaced a minimum of ten feet from each other, measured from the closest parts of the buildings. c. No multiple dwelling unit shall be located closer than 20 feet to any part of another dwelling unit. 2. Density a. In calculating the density for a proposed Performance Residential Development, the areas in subsections 1 and 2 shall first be subtracted from the gross area of land to be committed to development. In lieu of subtracting Dorovan, Johnston, and Pamlico soils, the developer may choose to preserve 100 percent of such areas as conservation space in accordance with Section 5.7, Conservation Resources: 1. All natural lakes, ponds, rivers, or marshes; and, 3 -4 New Hanover County, NC I Unified Development Ordinance Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-17 3.2.11. RESIDENTIAL MODERATE -HIGH DENSITY (R -5) DISTRICT A. Purpose The purpose of the Residential Moderate -High Density (R -5) District is to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density residential development on smaller lots with a compact and walkable development pattern. The R -5 district allows a range of housing types and can be developed in conjunction with a non - residential district to create a vertical mixed -use development pattern as well as serve as a transition between mixed -use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential development. B. Concept N C. Use Standards Allowed uses and use - specific standards for principal, accessory, and temporary uses are established in Article 4: Uses and Use - Specific Standards. D. District Dimensional Standards Standard Single Family Detached Duplex Triplex Quadraplex Lot area, minimum (square feet)* 5,000 7,500 12,500 17,500 1 Lot width, minimum (feet)* 50 2 Front setback (feet)* 20 3 Side setback, street (feet)* 10.5 4 Side setback, interior (feet)* 7 5 Rear setback (feet)* 15 Density, maximum (dwelling unitslacre) ** 8 Building height, maximum (feet) 35 Does not apply to Performance Residential Developments (see Section 3.1.3.D). * Applies only to Performance Residential Developments (see Section 3.1.3.D). 3 -32 New Hanover County, NC I Unified Development Ordinance Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-18 3.5.5. CONDITIONAL ZONING (CZ) DISTRICT A. Purpose The Conditional Zoning (CZ) District option is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the objectives of this Ordinance and only a specific use or multiple specific uses are proposed and appropriate for the development of a site. The district is primarily intended for use at transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at- large. It is intended only for firm development proposals and should not be used for tentative projects without definitive plans. B. Applicability CZ districts are intended only for voluntary proposals submitted in the names of the owners of all property included in the petition /application. C. Districts Established The following conditional zoning districts, each bearing the designation "CZ ", are hereby established: 1. The residential conditional zoning districts include: CZ -RA, CZ -AR, CZ- R20S, CZ -R -20, CZ -R15, CZ -R -10, CZ -R -7, CZ -R -5, CZ- RMF -L, CZ- RMF -M, CZ- RMF -MH, CZ- RMF -H. 2. The commercial and industrial conditional zoning districts include: CZ- B- 1, CZ- CB, CZ -15-2, CZ- © &I, CZ -SC, CZ- CS, CZ -1 -1, and CZ -1 -2. D. District Requirements 1. Eligible Uses Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding general use district are eligible for CZ district consideration and any such use within a CZ district shall, as a minimum requirement, satisfy all the regulations of the corresponding general use district. 2. Additional Conditions and Requirements The approval for a specific CZ district shall specify all additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the land than the corresponding general use district regulations or other limitations on land that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance. Such conditions and requirements shall not specify ownership status, race, religion, character, or other exclusionary characteristics of the occupant(s), shall be objective, specific, and detailed to the extent necessary to accomplish their purpose, and shall relate rationally to making the approval compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, other pertinent requirements of this Ordinance, and to securing the public health, safety, morals, and welfare. 3 -108 New Hanover County, NC I Unified Development Ordinance Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-19 Middlesound LLC Professional Qualifications Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-20 SCOTT D. STEWART RLA ASLA Real Estate Developer 1 Landscape Architect 1 General Contractor 1 Realtor 6933 Running Brook Terrace; Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 scottstewart6933 a(D.yahoo.com 1- 910 - 231 -2428 Education: Bachelor of Science, Rutgers University 1976 College of Agriculture & Environmental Science, New Brunswick, NJ Licenses: Landscape Architect, North Carolina; License # 1128 2000 - 2006, 2013 - Landscape Architect, New York; License #0836 1981 -2000 Landscape Architect, New Jersey; License # 0033 1984-2000 General Contractor, Commercial /Residential, N.C. #72619 2013- North Carolina Real Estate Broker; License # 279570 2014- Associations: Member, American Society of Landscape Architects 1981 - 2006, 2013 - Member, National Association of Realtors 2014 - Member, Wilmington Cape Fear Home Builders Association 2018- 2018 Calabash Waterfront Community Park Master Development Plan, Grant Acquisition 2017 Demarest Landing Board of Directors Member, Architectural Review Committee Member 2016 "Stewardship Champion Award "; Pioneering LID, Sustainable Growth and TND Program Models in South Eastern N.C. 2016 "Stewardship Outstanding Achievement Award "; Demarest Landing, Wilmington, N.C. 2016 "Stewardship Special Recognition Award "; Compass Pointe, Leland, NC 2015 Committee Member, Architectural Review; Compass Pointe, Leland, NC 2014 Guest Lecturer, "Demarest Neighborhoods ", First NC Example of Smart Growth & LID; LID Summit, Raleigh, N.C. 2013 Guest Lecturer, "Low Impact Development Basics for Water Quality Protection ", Wilmington, NC 2012 Calabash Community Park Dedication /Recognition, Town of Calabash, NC 2011 1st "Stewardship Award for Exceptional Contributions & Services ", Town of Calabash, NC 2011 "Calabash's Good Friend & Neighbor Award ", Calabash Community Park, Calabash, NC 2010 Long Range Planning Committee Member; Calabash Community Park Design, Calabash, NC 2009 Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Committee Member; Calabash, NC 2008 Philanthropic Financial /Planning Restructure "Tidal Walk ", Wilmington, NC 2007 Low Impact Development Guest Lecturer; Coastal Federation; Moorehead City, NC 2007 Low Impact Development (LID) Steering Committee; New Hanover /Brunswick County, NC 2006 "Stewardship Significant Achievement Award "; Demarest Village, Devaun Park, NC 2005 "Central Business District Streetscape Appreciation Award" 1998 -2005; Calabash, NC 2005 Volunteer Of The Year Award" Laney High School, Wilmington, NC 2004 "Volunteer Of the Year Award" Laney High School, Wilmington, NC 2003 "Tree Preservation Award ": Tidal Reach, Demarest Village /Landing, Wilmington, NC 2002 Committee Member; Streetscape /Central Business District, Calabash, NC 2001 Guest Lecturer, "Smart Growth ", Save our State Summit, Wilmington, NC 2001 Expert Consultant, "Paving the American Dream" Documentary, UNCW, Wilmington, NC 2000 Traditional Neighborhood Design "Expert Endorsement ", NC Governors Task Force 2000 Committee Member, Mixed Use Development Ordinance, Wilmington, INC 1999 Committee Member, Main Street Revitalization, Calabash, NC 1998 Guest Lecturer, "New Urbanism ", New Hanover /Brunswick /Pender /Onslow County, NC 1997 Philanthropic Planning Consultant: Corbet Family: Arlie Gardens to Wilmington, NC 1997 Founding Member, Board of Directors, Wilmington Country Day School, Wilmington, NC 1996 Founding Member, Board of Directors, Cape Fear Tomorrow, Wilmington, NC 1995 Charter Member, Congress for New Urbanism, Charleston, SC 1994 CNU Member, Congress for New Urbanism Summit, Los Angeles, California 1993 CNU Member, Congress for New Urbanism Summit, Alexandria, Virginia 1992 Guest Juror, Cocolaba Island Master Plan, Virgin Islands, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 1991 National Accreditation Review Committee, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 1990 Guest Lecturer, CADD Applications in Practice, Rutgers University 25th Anniversary 1989 Harvard Graduate School of Design, Golf Course Design, Cambridge, Mass. 1989 Rutgers University, Advanced Irrigation Design, New Brunswick, NJ 1988 1st Qualified Interdisciplinary Coordination Expert/Landscape Architect, NJ Superior Court 1988 NJASLA Merit Design Award (residential site design), "Stanford Village, West Milford, NJ 1988 NJ Builders Assoc. SAM award, Best Pre -Sales Center, "Cambridge Heights ", Ramsey, NJ 1988 Harvard Graduate School of Design, Housing /Health Care for the Elderly 1988 Harvard Graduate School of Design, Urban Waterfront Development 1987 Guest Juror, P.U.D. Site Design Critic, Rutger Uonir�rs#t6Landscspoe Architscijuri r $r�n 1985 NJASLA Merit Design Award (urban design) "Xee %awTenWgWsn'�7ev� j j en Ran , Weehawken, NJ Experience 1994 -2019 Real Estate Developer [1]; Landscape Architecture [2]; General Contractor [3]; Realtor [4] Expedite all business development programming, land assembly /acquisitions, design, implementation and tasks including: Legal; Accounting; Financing; Support Appraisal Documentation; Payables /Receivables; Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions; Landscape Architecture; Land Planning; Regulatory Approvals; Regulatory Permits; Tax Planning/ Returns; Surveying; Preliminary Maps; Final Maps; Civil Engineering; Environmental; Architecture; Construction Budgets/ Permits /Management; Bank Financing Construction Draw Requests; Clearing; Grading; Utilities; Horizontal Infrastructure; Roads; Sidewalks; Park Construction; Marine Construction; Landscaping; Irrigation; Lighting; Signage; Site Gazebo's; Arbor's; Sales Center; Clubhouse; Pool; Fountains; Maintenance; Marketing Materials, Programs, Sales, Events; Architectural Review for Community Associations. Tasks performed for the following Real Estate Development endeavors: Demarest Landing Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 1993-2000 Demarest Village Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 1997-2009 Tidal Reach Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 1997-2002 Devaun Park Calabash NC [1, 2, 3] 1997-2013 Overlook at Pages Creek Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 1999-2011 Middlesound Pointe Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 2004- Riptide Aquatic /Fitness Center Wilmington NC [1, 2, 3] 2005- Barclay West; Forks; Courtyard Wilmington NC [2,3] 2013-2014 Compass Pointe Leland NC [1,2] 2014-2016 Hyatt Place; Fairfield Inn Durham NC [2,3] 2014-2015 Homewood Suites Pinehurst NC [2,3] 2014-2015 Llewellyn Park (Mayfair) Wilmington NC [2] 2014-2017 Demarest Park Brunswick County NC [1,2,3,4] 2015- Wrightsville Beach Park Wilmington NC [1,2] 2016- Arboretum West, Arboretum Village Wilmington NC [2] 2017-2018 1989 -1994 Stewart /Burgis Professional Planners & Landscape Architects, Saddlebrook NJ Founder -Vice President - 50% Owner - Full Service Planning firm consulting to 17 NJ Municipalities Code Compliance, Urban Planning, Central Business District Studies 1982 -1995 Stewart Group Landscape Architects, Highland Park, NJ Founder — President - 1 00%Owner-Full Service Landscape Architectural /Land Planning Firm 30 Masterplan Communities 1979 -1982 Capibianco & Zemsky AIA, Secaucus, NJ Senior Landscape Architect — Master Town & Community Planner 1976 -1979 Tectonic Engineering, Sommerville, NJ Landscape Architect/Civil Draftsman Articles: Wilmington Business Journal 11 -16 -18 Wilmington Firm Proposes 2 Projects on Military Cutoff Road Lumina News 10 -04 -16 Ambitious Plan for Wrightsville Beach Park includes promenade, pier Wilmington Business Journal 02 -26 -16 Recent And Past Development Projects Honored With Stewardship Awards Brunswick Beacon 08 -11 -16 Compass Pointe Adds Land To Create Mixed Use Development Wilmington Buisness Journal 03 -13 -15 Compass Pointe Reboots With New Master Plan Incorporating TND Principles Coastal Federation 04 -07 -14 LID Draws a Packed House In Raleigh /Stewart Recognized as First LID Pioneer Brunswick Beacon 11 -22 -12 Stewart Recognized at Calabash Community Park Dedication Brunswick Beacon 03 -09 -11 Stewart Bestowed Calabash's First Stewardship Award Prevision Company 02 -10 -10 Riptide Aquatic Center 3D Visualization Achievement Brunswick Beacon 04 -25 -07 Environmental Recognition — Demarest Landing/Village; Devaun Park Wilmington Star 03 -30 -07 Opinions - Good Design /Soil Conservation Supervisor — Demarest/Devaun Park Wilmington Star 03 -11 -07 Eco- Friendly Developments Catching On- Demarest Landing - Devaun Park Wilmington Star 02 -03 -07 Stewardship Council Awards Green Developments- Demarest- DevaunPark Wilmington Star 03 -23 -05 Laney Parent Digs Deep - Stewart donates Campus Face Lift to Laney High School UNCW 05 -02 -01 Stormwater Commendation /Demarest Village Penderwatch News 10 -18 -00 Demarest Village- Low Impact Design Stormwater Achievements Town of Calabash 10 -17 -00 NCDOT Enhancement Grant Approval — River Road Revitalization, Calabash, NC Wilmington Star 09 -02 -00 Scott Stewart Profile — TND - Demarest Landing, Demarest Village Wilmington Star 06 -03 -00 Demarest Landing, Wilmington, NC - Profile of completed TND Achievements Wilmington Star 04 -06 -00 Demarest Village (Governor's Commendation) Wilmington Star 04 -04 -00 Demarest Landing/Village (Smart Growth) Wilmington Star 09 -15 -99 Devaun Park Commendation -Land Planning -Low Impact Stormwater Design Coastal Report 06 -01 -98 Demarest Landing Stormwater Commendation Wilmington Star 05 -11 -97 Demarest Landing, Wilmington, NC - Profile of Precedent Design Achievements Wilmington Star 06 -22 -96 New Urbanism - Andres Duany reveals TND practices at sold out UNCW program Wilmington Star 06 -13 -96 New Urbanism - Cape Fear Tomorrow- Stewart brings Duany to Wilmington Wilmington Star 03 -24 -93 Board of CoftM&Wr48rdipgl0r38g1k02fOC — First TND Neighborhood in Wilmington Rutgers University 12 -07 -93 TIT(M 4 OornFA& 2tion - Senior Landscape Architecture Program Scott D. Stewart RLA ASLA, Landscape Architect, Real Estate Developer, Real Estate Broker, Commercial General Contractor is a career Landscape Architect for 42 years. A 1976 Rutgers's University Graduate in Landscape Architecture, Scott apprenticed for three years at a civil engineering firm, land planning large PUD's, and three years with an architectural firm designing large scale high rise projects along the New Jersey Hudson River corridor that have now matured and define it's skyline between the George Washington Bridge and the Lincoln Tunnel. In 1982, SGLA - "Stewart Group Landscape Architects" was formed and blossomed from 1982 -1994 into three offices, with twenty -three employees executing over 400 projects, including 30 master planned communities. Stewart Burgis Professional Planners, founded in 1987, a complimentary five person planning firm to SGLA, consulted to 17 N.J. Municipalities expediting township masterplans, development regulations, low income housing compliances, urban revitalization, central business district studies & design, Planning Board and Board of Adjustment consultation specific to the review of development applications. The firms were recognized with several Merit Design Awards by the local ASLA Chapter during the 1980's with specialization in waterfront development together with attendance for numerous personal certifications from Harvard University, Graduate School of Design, Office of Special Programs. Introduced to the "Traditional Neighborhood Design" (TND) New Urbanism movement in 1989, a focus to transition from design and marketing consultant in the northeast tri -state area of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut prompted the move to Wilmington, N.C. in 1993 promoting TND models as the "precedent new model" for alternate, future growth. Since 1994, as an owner /developer, Scott has designed /developed four TND neighborhood programs: Demarest Landing, Demarest Village, Tidal Reach and Devaun Park collectively creating: 383 single family lots, 222 multifamily units, 220,000 sq. ft. commercial space and a 46 slip marina, realizing gross sales in excess of 45 million. Demarest Landing commenced in 1993 and implemented Low Impact Development (LID) techniques prior to establishment of the current BMP design standards and LID programs popular today. Demarest Village was the first High Density /Low Density stormwater program implemented in North Carolina in 1998 promoting LID techniques, voluntarily demonstrating and exploring practical, responsible, cost effective solutions as an alternate for managing stormwater while preserving and enhancing existing natural features woven among his communities. The Demarest neighborhoods, named after "William Demarest Stewart ", in the Middle Sound Community of Wilmington, N.C., became the southeast regions first examples of "Smart Growth" and "Low Impact Development" endorsed by the N.C. Governor's Task Force for "Smart Growth "in 2000. Demarest Landing and Demarest Village in Wilmington, N.C., and the Devaun Park development program in Calabash, N.C. under Scott's leadership, were among the first to receive the Lower Cape Fear Stewardship Coalition (LCFSC) Awards for "Significant Achievement" in 2006 for land planning, storm water management with creative, precedent design programs. LCFSDC 10th anniversary in 2016 awarded Scott the first "Champion Award" to an individual for pioneering the first sustainable growth models in south eastern North Carolina and "Outstanding Achievement" award for Demarest Landing for being the first model program. Philanthropic and personal recognitions include: "Tree Preservation Award" from the City of Wilmington, N.C. in 2003; "Volunteer of the Year" in 2004 & 2005 by New Hanover County Schools, Wilmington, N.C. for "Laney High School Campus Renovation'; "Main Street Revitalization" in 2005, "Good Neighbor" and the first "Stewardship" award honors received by the Town of Calabash in 2011 for contributions to assist Calabash to grow responsibly over the past 17 years, including the first "Calabash Community Park" that was completed in 2012. During the execution of the four TND neighborhoods Scott has developed, he has: served on the Board of Directors, authored all Design Guidelines, Covenant & Restrictions; managed all aspects of development design, approvals, /infrastructure, construction, created and directed all sales and marketing programs. Scott has served, in the City of Wilmington, on the "Mixed Use Development Ordinance Committee "; in the Town of Calabash, on the "Unified Development Ordinance Committee" and serves on the "Long Range Planning Committee" in Calabash 2004 - 2019. Demarest Park- A TND Pattern Sustainable Mixed Use Community, Brunswick County, NC and Riptide Aquatic Center, Wilmington, N.C. are the focus of current development efforts. Scott is Owner & Principle of: "Demarest Company Landscape Architects" (DCLA), a Landscape Architectural Firm for all land planning, marketing ventures; "Peninsula Capital Group ", a Commercial General Contracting Firm for construction of selected Commercial and Residential projects; Demarest Realty, a Real Estate Brokerage and Management Company. In addition to his own development ventures, Scott has consulted to: CP Brunswick LLC as Advisor, Landscape Architect, General Contractor for Compass Pointe, Leland, N. C. Master Planning and Development of 2,200 acres, remaining 1808 units, 555,825 sq.ft. commercial, 18 -hole golf course. CP Brunswick was awarded by LCFSDC in 2016 for a "Special Recognition" due to Scott's new Master Plan program for Compass Pointe. Cameron Management as Advisor /Landscape Architect overseeing the design development of the last remaining developable 500 acres in the City of Wilmington, NC including: Barclay West/The Pointe mixed use community of 1.48 million sq. ft. commercial /1,375 residential units on 300 acres; "The Forks" TND pattern of 133 residences on 46 acres; Henry's Restaurant Site Renovation@ Barclay Commons; Summit Hospitality Group LTD, Raleigh, N.C. as Advisor /Landscape Architect /General Contractor for the completion of "Hyatt Place" and the renovation of the "Fairfield Inn & Suites ", Durham, N.C.; "Homewood Suites ", Pinehurst, N.C. Mayfair 1 LLC as Landscape Architect for Mayfair (Weeks), Mixed Use, 45 acres, 325 units, Mayfair, Wilmington, N. C. Town of Wrightsville Beach as Landscape Architect for the Wrightsville Beach Park Masterplan Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Tribute Properties as Landscape Architect for Arboretum WeskTQ066tar� Mge, 360 Multifamily, 98 Townhomes, 18,500 sq. ft. Commercial PBC Design Build Professional Qualifications Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-24 Y DESIGN BUILD AWARDS 2020 HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN GUILDQUALITY GUILDMASTER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE 2019 HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, THOM'S CREEK RIVER HOUSE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, 7 MYRTLE WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, SAUTHIER II WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES BEST DESIGN: KITCHEN, THOM'S CREEK RIVER HOUSE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES BEST DESIGN: OUTDOOR LIVING, THOM'S CREEK RIVER HOUSE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, DUNEWALK TOWNES WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, RIVERVIEW TOWNES HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, BEAUTIFUL FIT, MENTESANA RESIDENCE 2018 WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, STARLING WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, RIVERVIEW TOWNES WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, DUNEWALK TOWNES WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES BEST DESIGN; KITCHEN, STARLING WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES BEST DESIGN; MASTER BATH, STARLING HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICE GUILDQUALITY GUILDMASTER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-25 314 WALNUT STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 910- 763.8760 www.pbcdesignbuild.c ©m ; iiTlr� 2017 D ESIGN BUILD WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, DRAKE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: BRONZE AWARD, HAVEN HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICE 2016 WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, LARK'S'p WILMINGTON -GAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, TANGIER; L,_ WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, CATE GREENEs "P.. WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: BEST DESIGN: MASTER BATH, CATE GREENE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: BEST DESIGN: KITCHEN, TANGIER HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN" E_` HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICESEP 2015 HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN HOUZZ AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICE 2014 BRUNSMCK COUNTY HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: DIAMOND AWARD, WYNWARD WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, LARK WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, LAUTNER HOUZZ AWARD BEST OF 2014 AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, DESIGN HOUZZ AWARD BEST OF 2014 AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE, SERVICEsiP, HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, COMPATIBLE NEW CONSTRUCTION, ROSS -BRADY HOUS '46, GUILD QUALITY: 2014 GUILDMASTER AWARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE 314 WALNUT STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 910.763.8760 www.pbcdesignbuild.com Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-26 PBC 2013 DESIGN I BUILD PROFESSIONAL BUILDER MAGAZINE: TOP 40 BUILDERS UNDER 40, KYLE HENRY QUALITY REMODELERS MAGAZINE: TOP 500 OF 2013, RUSTY MEADOR WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, PIPEKsEr' WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, WYNWARD4 ?, HOU77 AWARD BEST OF 2013 AWARD FOR EXCELLENCrAp; 2012 WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, ROBERTIE RESIDENCQd'hp WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: MARKETER OF THE YEAR, KASEY VALENTE`.',' 2008 MULTI- FAMILY EXECUTIVE LOW RISE PROJECT OF THE YEAR, NEW YORK HATTERSSEP WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, NEW YORK HATTE%S WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, WELDONJ6' WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: DIRECT MARKET ADVERTISING, WELDON WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: ROOKIE OF THE YEAR, KASEY VALENTE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: BEST BUILDER PRINT ADVERTISING, PBC WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: SALES MODELATTACHED HOME, NEW YORK HATTERS HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, COMPATIBLE NEW INFILL, MERCANTILE BUILDING HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, COMPATIBLE NEW INFILL, NEW YORK HATTERS HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, COMPATIBLE NEW INFILL, CHURCH STREET RESIDENCE 2007 WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: GOLD AWARD, MODERN BAKING COMPANY WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION MAX! AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE: BEST NEW HOME COMMUNITY LOGO DESIGN, WELDON 314 WALNUT STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401 910.783.8780 __ . www.pbcdesignbuild.com Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -7-27 a DESIGN PB BUILD 2006 HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: COMPATIBLE NEW CONSTRUCTION, BROOKLYN HOUSE'SEP, 2005PSER° HISTORIC WILMINGTON FOUNDATION: PRESERVATION AWARD, ADAPTIVE REUSE, NORTHSIDE 206s_v6' WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, LAUREL OAKSkEP, 2002'1k MACIE HOMEOWNERS: SUPREME CUSTOMER SERVICE AWARD, DEMAREST VILLAGESEP 2001"46' WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: BRONZE AWARD, DEMAREST VILLAGE WILMINGTON -CAPE FEAR HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PARADE OF HOMES: SILVER AWARD, CAROLINA PLACE 2000'L5Ee; JC MORGAN REAL ESTATE VALUATION I REVIEW I CONSULTING June 26, 2020 New Hanover County County Commissioners 230 Government Center Drive Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Rezoning Request Z20 -09 Middlesound, LLC 3.35 at 500 Block of Middle Sound Loop Road Wilmington, NC 28411 JC Morgan Company is a real estate appraisal and consulting firm in Wilmington, NC. Since 2010, our firm has appraised and consulted on hundreds of properties in and around the Wilmington area. The property types we appraise and provide consulting services for include residential, retail, office, multi - family, subdivisions and mixed -use, to name a few. Our client base consists of real estate owners, developers, financial institutions, local and federal governments, attorneys, utility companies and airport authorities. I was recently engaged by the applicant to perform research and analysis that would enable me to conclude an opinion as to the following: Will the proposed use substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property? To develop an opinion to this question, I took several steps. Each is summarized as follows: 1. Initially, I performed a cursory review of several comparable multi - family and townhouse properties in the Wilmington area to determine the impact, if any, these properties had on adjacent property values. During this research, I found no indication that the properties abutting the adjacent townhome communities had a negative (or positive) impact on value. 2. Discussions with market participants is a common method to get a feel of how the market perceives various issues. For this assignment, I spoke with several market participants about the impact the proposed development could have on the adjoining or abutting properties. I spoke with four (4) market participants active in the local real estate market (2 residential real estate appraisers and 2 residential real estate brokers). All four of the individuals indicated that the proposed project would have no impact on the real estate values of adjoining or abutting properties. Lumina Station 1904 ]Eastwood Road • Suite 305 - Wilmington, NC - 28403 PO Box 481 - Wrightsville Beach, NC • 28480 Tel: 910 -256 -2920 - ]Fax: 888 - 819 =8258 swww jcmo;rgannco.com Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 8 - 1 3. Finally, I researched several comparable situations in which residential properties backed up to properties that were either multi - family or a more intense land use. These include: a. Waterstone residential subdivision, which backs up to Blair Elementary School b. Georgetown residential subdivision, which backs up to Telsa Park apartment community A detailed analysis of each of these was performed where residential properties that do back up to land uses considered comparable or even more intense than the proposed project were compared to similar residential properties that do not back up to these uses. The data indicates that the proposed project would have no negative impact on the values of the adjoining or abutting properties. I have brought summaries of these studies for your review, if requested. Regarding the character of the community, currently there exists similar town home options in Middle Sound including Demarest Village, Anchor Bend and Thai's Trail. The proposed building height of 35' for Demarest Pointe is consistent with the current zoning criteria required for single family, duplex and townhomes in the adjacent and surrounding neighborhoods of Middle Sound. Furthermore the property is in the immediate vicinity and between the recently approved Canopy Pointe (CDZ) RMF -M (15 units per acre) and the existing Middle Sound Village (EDZD at 4.5 units per acre). The proposed project, located at the "point" of the traffic circle, provides the desired transition from the hustle and bustle at the traffic circle to the single family uses just west of the subject. Any other use of the site is unlikely due to its multiple road frontages and proximity to the traffic circle. Should you have any questions, or want to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 9 Z-1 &61 r Jack C. (Cal) Morgan, III, MAI, SRA, AI -GRS JC Morgan Company Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 8 - 2 LSD ENGINEERING May 13, 2020 Scott D. Stewart Middlesound, LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Re: Demarest Pointe Additional Stormwater Calculations New Hanover County Dear Scott: We have reviewed the conceptual stormwater management program for the proposed Demarest Pointe project to determine if the conceptual onsite stormwater management control measures have the capacity to attenuate a storm event larger than the 100 yr storm. In reviewing the New Hanover County Stormwater Design Manual, the 100 yr storm is the largest event referenced and lists the rainfall as 10 inches over a 24 hr period. For larger storm events, we utilize online rainfall data published on NOAA's website for the Wilmington Station, in this case to analyze the 500 year and 1,000 year events. Relevant rainfall data was input into our hydraulic modeling software along with site specific data and design contour information associated with the proposed stormwater control measures (SCM's). SCS hydrographs with Type III distributions were then generated for the pre - development, post - development, and routed conditions, producing volumes, peak flow rates, and maximum stage elevations within the SCM for each condition. Please reference the table below for the results of the 100 year, 500 year, and 1,000 year pre /post /routed analyses: Storm Event Rainfall (inches) Pre -Dev Volume (CF) Pre -Dev Peak Flow (CFS) Post -Dev Volume (CF) Post -Dev Peak Flow (CFS) Routed Flow (CFS) Max. Water elev. (FT) Top of pond (FT) 100 10.0 48,774 16.12 82,322 26.95 8.44 26.00 27.0 500 18.1 126,880 42.31 174,484 54.26 32.05 26.75 27.0 1,000 21.1 158,089 52.43 206,452 64.26 46.02 26.87 27.0 To further summarize, results of the 500 year storm event (18.1 inches over a 24 hour period) model show the proposed stormwater management system will decrease the flow from the developed site to a lower rate than if the site was left undeveloped, reducing the flow by over 10 CFS. For the 1,000 yr storm event (21.1 inches over a 24 hour period), the 3805 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, NC 28403 - 910 7914441 - www.csd- engineering.com - License # C -2710 CSD EN61NEfAtNd9 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 1 Demarest Pointe — Additional Stormwater Calculations 12 modeling also yields similar results with a reduction in overall routed post development flow from the site, decreasing the post development flow by over 6 US when compared to the pre - development condition. For all three events, the models indicate that the SCM's peak stage elevation will not overtop the pond embankment. For your reference, we have attached the hydrograph modeling reports. We thank you for the opportunity to be involved in this project and look forward to assisting in any manner possible. Please call or email me if you require any additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, Howard Resnik, PE Attachments 3805 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, NC 28403 - 910 7914441 - www.csd - engineering.com — License # C -2710 1 CSDN° Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 16.12 2 724 48,774 — --- -- Pre Dev 2 SCS Runoff 26.95 2 724 82,322 -- -- -- Post Dev 4 Reservoir 8.435 2 742 79,730 2 26.00 36,160 Routed demarest.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 3 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 12020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 16.12 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 48,774 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 55* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = Oft Tc method = User Time of cone. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 10.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 * Composite (Area/CN) _ [(0.610 x 98) + (2.670 x 39)) / 3.390 Pre_Dev Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 18.00 18.00 15.00 15.00 12.00 12.00 9.00 9.00 6.00 6.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D(@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 113 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Post_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 26.95 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 82,322 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = Oft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 10.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Composite (Area /CN) = [(1.490 x 98) + (1.900 x 61)113.390 Post_Dev Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 000 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3De 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 8.435 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.37 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 79,730 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post _Dev Max. Elevation = 26.00 ft Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage = 36,160 cuft Storage Indication method used. Routed Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0 00 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 36,160 cuft Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 6 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 42.31 2 724 126,880 — Pre –Dev 2 SCS Runoff 54.26 2 724 172,484 — - -- Post –Dev 4 Reservoir 32.05 2 730 169,829 2 26.75 58,358 Routed demarest.gpw Return Period: 500 Year Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 7 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 113 / 2020 Hyd. No. 'I Pre_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 42.31 cfs Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 126,880 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 55* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 18.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 * Composite (Area /CN) = [(0.610 x 98) + (2.670 x 39)] / 3.390 Q (cfs) 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Pre_Dev Hyd. No. 1 -- 500 Year Q (cfs) 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 I i i 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Post_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 54.26 cfs Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 172,484 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 18.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area/CN) = [(1.490 x 98) + (1.900 x 61)] 13.390 Post Dev Q (cfs) Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 500 Year 60.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 30.00 30,00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 n on 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 - Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 9 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 113 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 32.05 cfs Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak = 12.17 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 169,829 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post_Dev Max. Elevation = 26.75 ft Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage = 58,358 cuft Storage Indication method used. Routed Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 10 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd, No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 52.43 2 724 158,089 —__ _e ____ Pre_Dev 2 SCS Runoff 64.26 2 724 206,452 - - -- -- -- Post Dev 4 Reservoir 46.02 2 728 203,786 2 26.87 61,987 Routed demarest.gpw Return Period: 1,000 Year Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 9 - 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 52.43 cfs Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 158,089 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 55* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 21.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 * Composite (Area/CN) = ((0.610 x 98) + (2.670 x 39)113.390 Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 wim Pre_Dev Hyd. No. 1 -- 1,000 Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 1 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-12 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Post_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 64.26 cfs Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 206,452 cuft Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 21.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 * Composite (Area /CN) = [(1.490 x 98) + (1.900 x 61)) 13.390 Q (cfs) 70.00 •1 11 50.00 40.00 30.00 r1 11 10.00 Post_Dev Hyd. No. 2 -- 1,000 Q (cfs) 70.00 •I 11 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 ' I 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 113 / 2020 Hyd. No. 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 46.02 cfs Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak = 12.13 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 203,786 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post _Dev Max. Elevation = 26.87 ft Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage = 61,987 cuft Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 70.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Routed Hyd. No. 4 -- 1,000 Q (cfs) 70.00 .I FT1, 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 ' 1 1 1 1 1 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 61,987 cuft Time (nrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-14 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Pond No. 4 - Retaining Wall Pond Data Contours - User - defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 24.50 ft Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 24.50 19,413 0 0 0.50 25.00 23,283 10,658 10,658 1.50 26.00 27,679 25,447 36,105 2.50 27.00 32,185 29,901 66,006 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PifRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 24.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 8.00 4.00 40.00 0.00 Span (in) = 24.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 25.70 25.20 26.50 0.00 No. Barrels = 2 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 2.60 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 24.50 24.50 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = 1 Rect Broad -- Length (ft) = 30.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes Yes No No Slope ( %) = 0.30 0.00 0.00 n/a N -Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in /hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area) Multi -Stage = n/a Yes No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Stage (ft) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0 00 Note: Culvert/Onfice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). Stage / Discharge Elev (ft) 27.50 26.50 25.50 24.50 0.00 6.00 12.00 16.00 24.00 30.00 35.00 42.00 48.00 54.00 60.00 66.00 Total Q Discharge (cfs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-15 Precipitation Frequency Data Server https: //hdse. nws.noaa. gov/hdse /pfds /pfds_TriDtpage.html ?lat= 34.2350 &... NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Location name: Wilmington, North Carolina, USA* Latitude: 34.235 °, Longitude: - 77.946° A. Elevation: 32.65 ft ** ` source: ESRI Maps °vim .. / `* source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES G.M. Sonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley NOPP, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF-tabular I PF graphical I Maps_ &_aerials PF tabular PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Average recurrence interval (years) Duration�� I F 2 F 5 F 10 F 25 F 50 L 100 _ 200 _. 500 _,_1000 5 -min 0.522 0.620 0.726 0.808 0.913 0.991 1.07 115 1.26 1.34 (0.48 8- 0.563) (0.579 -0 668) (0.676 0.780)' (0.750 0.869),x(0.84_ (0 911 1,06)', (0.981 - 1.15) (1.05 1.24);1(1.13 1.35)'. (1.20 -1.45) 10 -min 0.834 0.992 1.16 1.29 1.46 1.58 1,70 7.83 1.99 )_ 2.11 (0.779 - 0.899) (0.925- 1.07), (1.08-1.25)_ (1,20-1.39) (1.34 -1.56) (1.45-1.69)j(1.56-1.83) ( 1.66 -1.96 ) ( 1.79 -2.14 ( 1.89- 2.28).. 15 -min 1.04 1.25 1,47 1.64 1.84 2.00 2,15 2.31 F 2.50 2.65 15-min (1.16 -1.34) 1 (1.37-1.58) 1 (1.52-1.76) 1 (1.70- 1.98)._ [(1.84-2.15) (1.97-2.31) 1(2.09-2.48)1(2.25-2.70)1(2.37-2.86) 30 -min 1.43 F 1.72 F 2.09 F 2.37 2.73 3.01 F 3.30 F 3.59 3.98 - F 4.30 1 (1.34-1.54) 1 (1.61 -1.86) 1 (1.95-2.25) 1 (2.20 -2.55) 1 _ (2.52-2.93) (2.77 3.23) : 1(3.02-3.54) 1(3.26-3.86)1(3.58-4.29)1(3.83-4.64) 60 -min 1.78 2.16 2.68 3.09 3.64 4.08 4.54 5.03 5.71 6.27 (1.67 -1.92) (2.0�'� (2.50 - 2.88)_. (2.86 -3.32) ..(3.36 - 3.90)_..(3.75-4.38) 1(4.16-4.88) . (4.57- 5.41).�(5.1�....(5.59 6.77)) 1�1 2 -hr 2.11 2,57 3,28 3,87 4.72 5.45 6.25 7.12 8,42 9.53 (1.95 -2.30) (2.37-2-81) (3.02 -3.57) (3.554.21) . (4.3�. (4.96 5.93) 1(5.65-6.79) 1(6.40-7.73)1(7A8-9.16)1(8.40-10.4) 2.26 2.74 3.52 4.18 5.17 6.03 7.00 8.07 9.71 11.1 1 3 -hl „ (2.0�. 1 (2.53 - 3.00) 1 (3.24 -3.84) 1 (3.83 -4.56) (4.71 -5.62) (5.47 6.57) 1(6.30-7.60) (7.20 - 8.75)'. (8.56- 10.5).. (9.70 12.1): 6 -hr 2.80 3.40 4.36 5.20 6.45 7.54 8.78 10.2 12.3 14.2 (2.59 -3.06) 1 (3.15 -3.73) 1 (4.02 -4.77) j (4.77 -5.68) 1 (5.88-7.02) 1(6.84-8-21) 1(7.91-9.54) 1(9.05-11.0) l(10.8-13.4)1(12 3 15.4) a. F-3,27 3.99 F 5.14 F 6.16 F 7,69 9.06 10.6 F 12.4 - F 15.1 F 17.5 ""y 1 4 14 -5.01 (5. 01 -6.06 (. ) ) I (6.41 -7.78) 1 (7.61 -9.27) 1 (9.39 -71.6) (10.9 -13.6) (12.6 - 15.9)' 1(14.4-18.5),1(17,1-22.6)1(19.4-26.3) 3 -day 4.82 5.82 7.47 8.79 10.9 12.7 14.7 17.0 - 20 4 23.5 ) (4.425.33) (5.33 -6.43) (6.77 -8.20) (8.00 -9.72) (9,80-12.0) (11.3-14.1) (13.0-16.3) (14.8-18.9)i(17.5-23,0)1(19.7-26.5 4 -day _. 5.11 F 6.16 F 7.80 F 9.21 7 11.3 F 13.1 15.1 17.3 F 20.7 F 23.7 _ (4.69 -5.64) (5,65-6.80) t (7.13-8.62) (8.39 -10.2) 1 (10.2-12.5) (11.7-14.5) 1(13.4-16.8) 1(15 2 -19.3) (17.9 -23 3) (20.1 -26.8) 7 -day 5.87 7.08 ) ( 8.90 10.4 12.7 14.5 16.6 18.8 221 24,8 (5.43 -6.41) (6.55 -7.72 8.22 -9.71) (9.59-11.4) (11.6 -118) ,(13.2- 15.9)' (14.9 - 18.1)(16.7-20.6)1(19.3-24.4)(2i.4-27 .7) 10 -da 6.63 7.94 9.84 11.4 13.7 15.7 17.8 20.0 23.3 26.1 y (6.15 -7.20) (7.36 -8.62) _(9.09 -10.7) (10.5 12.4)_1.1_ (12�. (14-3-171) (16 1 -19 4),1(17.9-21.9)1(20.6-25.7)1(22.7-29.0) 20-day 8 8.88 10.6 12.9 14.8 17.5 19.8 22.1 24.7 28.3 31.2 ( .29 -9.56) 1 (9.88 -11.4) (12.0 -13.9) 1 (13.8 -15.9) 1 (16.2-18.9) (18.2 -21.3) (20.2 -24.0) (22.3- 26.8), 1(25.2-31.0)1(2 7.5-34 .4) 30 -day 10.9 13.0 15.6 17.7 20.6 23.0 25.4 27,9 31.4 34.1 (10.3-11.7) (12.2 -13.9) (14.6 -16.6) (16.6-18.9) (19.3-22.0) (21.3-24.6) (23.4 -27.2) (25.6 -30.0) (28.4 -34.0) (30.6 -372) 45 -day 13.6 16.1 19.1 21.5 24,9 27.5 30,2 33.0 36 9 39.8 (12.9 -14.5) (15.2 -17.1) (18.0 -20.3) 1 (20.3 -22.9) 1 (23.3-26.4) 1(25.7-29.3) (28.1 32.3) (30.4 35.4) (33.6-39.7)1(36.0-43.2) 60 -day 16.4 19.3 22.5 25.1 28.6 31.4 34.1 36.8 40,4 43.1 (15.5 -17.4) (182-20.4) (21.3 -23.9) (23.7-26.6) (26.9 - 30.4) 1(29.4-33.3) (31.8 -36 3) 1(34.1-39.3)1(37.1-43.4)1(39.4-46.6) 1 . Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). lumbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency stimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5 %. '. stimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP alues. 'lease refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. PF graphical Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 1 of 3 ITEM: 7 -9-16 5/13/2020, 8:10 AM _. F 24 -hr I 3.84 (3.504.28) 4.66 (4.25 -5.20) 6.03 (5.48 -6 72) 7.23 (6.56 8 05) 9.09 (8.16 10.1) 10.7 (9.56 11.9) 12.6 - (11.1 14.0) 14.8 1(12-8-16.4) 8.1 I (15.4 20.2) 21.1 (17.5-237) ' C AS 7 n 9 1 k 17 1 1 n A i 9',�')I IA R 91 C C I 'fin 4 i 9 ""y 1 4 14 -5.01 (5. 01 -6.06 (. ) ) I (6.41 -7.78) 1 (7.61 -9.27) 1 (9.39 -71.6) (10.9 -13.6) (12.6 - 15.9)' 1(14.4-18.5),1(17,1-22.6)1(19.4-26.3) 3 -day 4.82 5.82 7.47 8.79 10.9 12.7 14.7 17.0 - 20 4 23.5 ) (4.425.33) (5.33 -6.43) (6.77 -8.20) (8.00 -9.72) (9,80-12.0) (11.3-14.1) (13.0-16.3) (14.8-18.9)i(17.5-23,0)1(19.7-26.5 4 -day _. 5.11 F 6.16 F 7.80 F 9.21 7 11.3 F 13.1 15.1 17.3 F 20.7 F 23.7 _ (4.69 -5.64) (5,65-6.80) t (7.13-8.62) (8.39 -10.2) 1 (10.2-12.5) (11.7-14.5) 1(13.4-16.8) 1(15 2 -19.3) (17.9 -23 3) (20.1 -26.8) 7 -day 5.87 7.08 ) ( 8.90 10.4 12.7 14.5 16.6 18.8 221 24,8 (5.43 -6.41) (6.55 -7.72 8.22 -9.71) (9.59-11.4) (11.6 -118) ,(13.2- 15.9)' (14.9 - 18.1)(16.7-20.6)1(19.3-24.4)(2i.4-27 .7) 10 -da 6.63 7.94 9.84 11.4 13.7 15.7 17.8 20.0 23.3 26.1 y (6.15 -7.20) (7.36 -8.62) _(9.09 -10.7) (10.5 12.4)_1.1_ (12�. (14-3-171) (16 1 -19 4),1(17.9-21.9)1(20.6-25.7)1(22.7-29.0) 20-day 8 8.88 10.6 12.9 14.8 17.5 19.8 22.1 24.7 28.3 31.2 ( .29 -9.56) 1 (9.88 -11.4) (12.0 -13.9) 1 (13.8 -15.9) 1 (16.2-18.9) (18.2 -21.3) (20.2 -24.0) (22.3- 26.8), 1(25.2-31.0)1(2 7.5-34 .4) 30 -day 10.9 13.0 15.6 17.7 20.6 23.0 25.4 27,9 31.4 34.1 (10.3-11.7) (12.2 -13.9) (14.6 -16.6) (16.6-18.9) (19.3-22.0) (21.3-24.6) (23.4 -27.2) (25.6 -30.0) (28.4 -34.0) (30.6 -372) 45 -day 13.6 16.1 19.1 21.5 24,9 27.5 30,2 33.0 36 9 39.8 (12.9 -14.5) (15.2 -17.1) (18.0 -20.3) 1 (20.3 -22.9) 1 (23.3-26.4) 1(25.7-29.3) (28.1 32.3) (30.4 35.4) (33.6-39.7)1(36.0-43.2) 60 -day 16.4 19.3 22.5 25.1 28.6 31.4 34.1 36.8 40,4 43.1 (15.5 -17.4) (182-20.4) (21.3 -23.9) (23.7-26.6) (26.9 - 30.4) 1(29.4-33.3) (31.8 -36 3) 1(34.1-39.3)1(37.1-43.4)1(39.4-46.6) 1 . Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). lumbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency stimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5 %. '. stimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP alues. 'lease refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. PF graphical Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 1 of 3 ITEM: 7 -9-16 5/13/2020, 8:10 AM Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-17 1 OW 4k Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-18 x \ �~ 3�ID1'+LE 5£iiT•'+tJ Lt16�' PltvD - S.rZ 1943 g+ 4k Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -9-18 x PRELIMINARY STORMWATER EVALUATION For Demarest Pointe New Hanover County, North Carolina Prepared for Middlesound LLC. Date: June 29, 2020 Prepared by: CAPE FEAR ENGINEERING 151 Poole Road, Suite 100 Belville, INC 28451 (910) 383 -1044 NC License No. C -1521 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 1 CA SEA1_ r- 03 615 fVU Cape Fear Engineering (CFE) was requested to analyze independently the conceptual stormwater management plan for the proposed Demarest Pointe neighborhood prepared by Middlesound LLC, Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA and was requested to further provide CFE's professional opinion regarding the 5 -13- 20 CSD Engineering conceptual stormwater evaluation (attached as Exhibit A). CFE further prepared preliminary hydrologic analysis (Water Quantity), evaluated potential flooding impacts (Flood Zone Information), Watershed Impacts (Watershed Characteristics) and water quality impacts (Water Quality) on neighboring and downstream properties. WATER QUANTITY The Demarest Pointe project would be required to comply with New Hanover County stormwater ordinance which requires attenuation post - development runoff rates from the 2 -year (4.5 "), 10 -year (7.0 "), and 25 -year (8.05 ") 24 -hour storm events to pre - development values. CFE performed a preliminary routing analysis of the concept stormwater plan (attached as Exhibit B) utilizing Hydraflow Hydrographs modeling software. Model results show that the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is expected to reduce runoff for not only the NHC required design storms but also the 500 - year (18.10 ") and 1,000 -year (21.1 ") storms. A summary of results from CFE's routing analysis is shown in the table below. Design Pre -Dev. Post -Dev. Difference (CFS) Storm Runoff (CFS) Discharge (CFS) 2 -year 0.15 0.10 -0.05 (33% reduction) 10 -year 2.40 1.46 -0.94 (39% reduction) 25 -year 4.12 2.35 -1.77 (43% reduction) 50 -year 5.92 2.92 -3.0 (51% reduction) 100 -year 8.02 4.07 -3.95 (49% reduction) 500 -year 29.00 22.69 -6.31 (22% reduction) 1000 -year 37.92 35.26 -2.66 (7% reduction) A similar analysis was performed by CSD Engineering (attached as Exhibit A) which also showed attenuation of post - development runoff rates for up to the 1,000 -year storm. The analysis performed by CSD Engineering was performed using the same methodology and modeling software as CFE; however, there were very minor differences in model inputs for drainage area due to the conceptual nature of the Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-2 study, SCS curve numbers, times of concentrations, pond contour surface areas, and pond outlet configuration /elevations. In conclusion, CFE agrees with the overall findings of the 5 -13 -20 CSD Engineering report. CFE recognizes the Demarest Pointe neighborhood stormwater program will confidently manage a minimum of a 500 - year storm event and through the required permitting process, it is feasible to approach or meet attenuation of the 1,000 year storm event. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION According to FEMA flood maps, (attached as Exhibit C) the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is located outside of the 100 -year flood zone. Elevations onsite range from approximately +27' to +29'. The nearest 100 -year flood zone is located approximately 2,400' to the southeast with a reported food elevation of +13'. We understand that there have been concerns raised about the Demarest Pointe neighborhood proposal because there has been a history of downstream flooding. Review of FEMA maps and available elevation information shows that the downstream properties are at significantly lower elevations than the proposed Demarest Pointe project site whereas many downstream properties have been built within the 100 year flood zone and experience frequent flooding due to the existing elevations of the homes that were built within the 100 year flood zone of Pages Creek. One specific location of historical flooding is at the intersection of Parliament Drive and E. Bedford Drive. According to survey information provided by Atlantic Coast Surveying (attached as Exhibit D) the elevation of this intersection is approximately 6.0' msl as compared to flood zone elevation of 13' msl. WATER QUALITY Because the proposed Demarest Pointe neighborhood will disturb more than one acre and construct more than 10,000 sf it will require a State Stormwater permit from NCDEQ. The required water quality design storm standards are based on the location of the Demarest Pointe neighborhood, classification of receiving waterbody, and proximity of the site to the receiving water body. Typically, projects are required to store and treat runoff volume from the 1.5" design storm; however, Projects draining to and withing % mile of SA waters are required to store and treat runoff volume equal to the difference in post - development and pre - development runoff from the 1 -year 24 -hour storm. Pages Creek is classified as SA waters but since the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is greater than % mile from Pages Creek, approximately 0.65 miles, (attached as Exhibit E) the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is only required to be designed for the 1.5" water quality design storm. Preliminary calculations for the project indicate a water quality design volume of approximately 8,300 CF for the 1.5" event compared to 16,200 CF for the 1 -year 24 -hour storm event. Due to low infiltration rates and relatively shallow seasonal highwater table (SHWT), (attached as Exhibit F), a wet detention basis is expected to be the primary water quality treatment BMP. Based on the contributing drainage area, proposed impervious coverage, and anticipated pond depth it is estimated that a pond surface area of 4,800 sf will be required. The conceptual stormwater plan includes a pond with estimated surface area of 12,500 sf (approximately 260% of requirement). Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-3 Additionally, the conceptual stormwater plan incorporates additional storage and treatment in four rain gardens and one water quality swale (attached as Exhibit G). It is the opinion of CFE that the proposed Demarest Pointe neighborhood will provide significantly more stormwater treatment than required by NCDEQ. It is anticipated that the Demarest Pointe neighborhood will provide total treatment volume equal to the more stringent SA waters requirements, though not required. Demarest Pointe will have no adverse or negative impacts on downstream water quality. WATERSHED CHRACTERISTICS Utilizing USGS Quad maps and NCDEQ Online Stream Mapping application it was determined that the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is part of the Pages Creek watershed. According to the USGS StreamStats online application the contributing drainage area at the upper end of Pages creek is 2.21 square miles (1400 acres) with an estimated impervious coverage of 14.4% ('202 acres) (attached as Exhibit H). The entire Demarest Pointe site area (including drainage easement) is approximately 4.7 acres, which makes up less than 0.035% of the contributing watershed at the point of analysis on Pages Creek. Additionally, the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is expected to have impervious coverage of 65,000 sf. Construction of this impervious will result in a new watershed impervious coverage of 14.54% ('0.14%% increase). Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-4 EXHIBIT A CSD Engineering Conceptual Stormwater Evaluation Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-5 CSD ENGINEERING May 13, 2020 Scott D. Stewart Middlesound, LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Re: Demarest Pointe Additional stormwater Calculations New Hanover County Dear Scott: We have reviewed the conceptual stormwater management program for the proposed Demarest Pointe project to determine if the conceptual onsite stormwater management control measures have the capacity to attenuate a storm event larger than the 100 yr storm. In reviewing the New Hanover County stormwater Design Manual, the 100 yr storm is the largest event referenced and lists the rainfall as 10 inches over a 24 hr period. For larger storm events, we utilize online rainfall data published on N ©AA "s website for the Wilmington Station, in this case to analyze the 500 year and 1,000 year events. Relevant rainfall data was input into our hydraulic modeling software along with site specific data and design contour information associated with the proposed stormwater control measures (SCM "s). SCS hydrographs with Type III distributions were then generated for the pre - development, post - development, and routed conditions, producing volumes, peak flow rates, and maximum stage elevations within the SCM for each condition. Please reference the table below for the results of the 100 year, 500 year, and 1,000 year pre/post/routed analyses: Storm Event Rainfall (inches) Pre -Dev Volume (CF) Pre -Dev Peak Flow (CFS) Post -Dev Volume (CF) Post -Dev Peak Flow (CFS) Routed Flow (CFS) Max. Water elev. (FT) Top of pond (FT) 100 10.0 48,774 16.12 82,322 26.95 8.44 26.00 27.0 500 18.1 126,880 42.31 174,484 54.26 32.05 26.75 27.0 1,000 21.1 158,089 52.43 2+06,452 64.26 46.02 26.87 27.0 To further summarize, results of the 500 year storm event (18.1 inches over a 24 hour period) model show the proposed stormwater management system will decrease the flow from the developed site to a lower rate than if the site was left undeveloped, reducing the flow by over 10 CFS. For the 1,000 yr storm event (21.1 inches over a 24 hour period), the 3805 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, NC 28403 - 910 7914441 - www.csd- engineering.com — License # C -2710 f CA I�MIN3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-6 Demarest Pointe — Additionol Stormwater Colculotions 1 2 modeling also yields similar results with a reduction in overall routed post development flow from the site, decreasing the post development flow by over 5 US when compared to the ,pre - development condition. For ail three events, the models indicate that the 5CM's peak stage elevation will not overtop the pond embankment. For your reference„ we have attached the hydrograph modeling reports. We thank you for the opportunity to be involved in this project and look forward to assisting in any manner possible. Please call or email me if you require any additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, Howard Resnik, PE Attachments 3805 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, hIC 25403 - 910 7914441 - www.csd- engineering.com — License # C -2710 � � CSD FV3INFFFLYd Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-7 Hydrograph Summary Report ydeaflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodesicO Civil 3Dt& 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. x2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (tuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuff) Hydragraph Description 1 SCS Runoff 16.12 2 724 48,774 -- — Pre Dev 2 SCS Runoff 26.95 2 724 82,322 ---- Post Dev 4 Reservoir 8.435 2 742 79,730 2 26.00 36,160 Wednesday, Routed dernarest.gpw Return Period: 100 Year 05 / 13 f 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@) Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc, v2020 Wednesday, 0511312020 Hyd. No. 1 Pre_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 16.12 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 48,774 cult Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 55* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of cant. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 10.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 *Composite (Area1CN) = [ (0.610 x 98) + (2.670 x 39)l 13.390 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 • ffl L210 U4 3.00 Pre_Dev Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 . 64 3.001 0.00 i I -je— , ! I 1 - - 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hyd NQ+ 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -10-9 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 306 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 Past Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 26.95 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 82,322 CA Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip_ = 10.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (ArealCN) = [ (1.490 x 98) + (1.900 x 61)] 13.390 Post Dev Q (cfs) Hyd, No. 2 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 2$.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0 00 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hyd Na 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 10 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D82019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05113 12020 Hyd. No. 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 8.435 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.37 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 79,736 tuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post_Dev Max. Elevation = 26.00 ft Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage = 36,160 tuft Storage Indication method used. 0 (cfs 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 M11 4.00 Routed } Hyd. No. 4 — 100 Year Q (cfs) 2&00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 MIS 4.40 0.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Time (hrs) Hyd No, 4 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used - 36,160 cuff Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 11 Hydrograph Summary Repor ydraflow Hydrogra9ohs Extension for Autodesis(D Civil 3p@ 2619 by Autodesk, Inc. v2626 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 42.31 2 724 126,880 ----- - - Pre_Dev 2 SCS Runoff 54.26 2 724 172,484 — — 'Post Dev 4 Reservoir 32.65 2 730 169,829 2 26.75 58,358 Routed 05 / 13 /2020 dernarest.gpw Return Period: 500 Year Wednesday, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 12 Hydrvcgraph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Cavil 3138 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05113 ! 2020 Hyd. No. I Pre_Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 42.31 cfs Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 126,880 CA Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 55* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 18.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 . Composite (Area1CN) = [(0.610 x 98) + (2.670 x 39 )j 13.390 Q (cfs) 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Pre_Dev Hyd. No. 1 -- 500 Year Q (cfs) 50.00 IERIXON 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1 1 1 l i 1 1 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 30 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. Igo. 2 Post_©ev Wednesday, 0511312020 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 54.26 cfs Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 172,484 cult Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = Oft Tc method = User Time of cone. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total preeip. = 18.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area1CN) = [(1.490 x 98) + (9.900 x 61)] 13.390 Post Dev Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 500 Year Q (cfs) 60.00 - - -- - - 50.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 2 4 6 s 10 12 14 15 18 20 22 24 Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 14 Hydrograph Report Hydrafiow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No, 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Dev Max. Elevation Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Flouted Wednesday, 0511312020 = 32.05 cfs = 12.17 hrs = 169,829 tuft = 261.75 ft = 58,358 cufk Q 4Cfsj Hyd. No. 4 -- 500 Year Q WS) 50.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 OM 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 58,358 tuft Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 15 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydratlaw Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3DO 2019 by Autadesk, Inc. v202fl Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (tuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 52.43 2 724 158,089 — Pre_Dev 2 SC5 Runoff 6426 2 724 206,452 --- Post_Dev 4 Reservoir 46.02 2 728 243,786 2 26.87 61,987 Routed den-iarest.gpw Return Period: 1,000 Year Wednesday, 05 1 13 1 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 16 Hydragraph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. I Pre Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.350 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of cone. (Tc) Total precip. = 21.10 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area1CN) = [(0.610 x 98) + {2.670 x 39}] 13.390 Q (Cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.40 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1 , 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 Pre_Dev Hyd. No. 1 -- 1,000 6 8 10 12 14 Wednesday, 05I 1312020 = 52.43 cfs = 12.07 hrs = 158,089 cuft = 55* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type III = 484 Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.40 10.40 � i 0.00 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 17 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutodeskO Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 / 13 12020 Hyd. No. 2 Past Dev Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 64.26 cfs Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 206,452 cuff Drainage area = 3.390 ac Curve number = 77* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = Oft Te method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.04 min Total precip. = 21.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Composite (Area1CN) = E(1.490 x 98) + (1.900 x 61)] 13.390 Post Dev a (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 - -1,000 Q (cfs) 70.00 Vmmr 70.00 60.00 60.00 50.00 - 50.00 40.00 L 40.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 - 20.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 - 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 18 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D@2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 4 Routed Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1,000 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Past Dev Max. Elevation Reservoir name = Retaining Wall Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Routed Wednesday, 05 113 1 2020 = 46.02 cfs = 12.13 hrs = 203,786 tuft = 26.87 ft = 61,987 cult Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 1,000 0 (cfs) 70.00 70.00 50.00 60.00 50.00 - - 50.00 40.00 40.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 - 20.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 � Total storage used = 61,987 tuft 11fTte (nrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 19 Pond Report Hydrallow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D& 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 05 113 12020 Pond No. 4 - Retaining Wall Pond Data Contours - User- defned contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 24.50 ft Stage I Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) 0.00 Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (tuft) = .093 .013 0.00 24.50 Orifice Coeff. 1 9,413 0.60 0 0 Multi -Stage = nla 0.50 25.00 No TVW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 23,283 10,658 10,658 1.50 26.00 27,679 25,447 36,105 2.50 27.00 32,185 29,901 66,006 Culvert I Orifice 'Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 24.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 8.00 4.00 40.00 0.00 Span (inj = 24.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 25.70 25.20 26.50 0.00 No. Barrels = 2 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 2.60 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 24.50 24.50 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = 1 Rect Broad - Length (ft) = 30.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes Yes No No Slope (%) = 0.30 0.00 0.00 nla N -Value = .093 .013 .013 nla Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 6.60 0.60 EAL(inlhr) = 0.000 (lay Wet area) Multi -Stage = nla Yes No No TVW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Stage (ft) 3.00 PAR101 1.00 0.00 - 0.00 5.00 Total 0 Noce: CuhrerliCrifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (dc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s} Stage I Discharge Elev (ft) 27.54 26.50 25.50 I ° r r r r r ' 1 24.50 12.00 18.00 24.04 30.00 35.00 42.01} 48.00 54.00 60.00 66.00 Discharge (cfs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 20 Precipitation Frequency Data Sarver blips:// hdsc. nws. naaa. gevfhslselp#' d9/ pfds_lirintpage ,html?fat --34,23Sd&:... NOAAAtlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Location name; Wilmington, North Carolina, USA` ° Latitude: 34.236 °, Longitude: - 77.946° Elevation: 32.65 ft`* 1. source: ESRI Maps `''... _.. •• saurcc: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES GM Bonrun, o. Malin.. a Lin, T_ Pararsak, K ewa, and b, Rainy clang klaumal Weather saMce, 57teer spring. "ltd PF lebuler I PP_gLaphlce I Maps_& ae PF tabular PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 97% confidence intervals tin inches)! Average recurrence interval (years) - - -- - Duration - - - -- - 1 _ � 10 26 _ 6Q -- - jiQ 2aQ SoQ iQ @o 8-min 4.522 0.+7 20 0,726 0.809 4.813 0.981 1.97 1.16 1.28 1.34 (0,498-0.563]. _ {0_5795! -669) (0.676 -0760)', (0.750.0.981t] [4. 844 -4. 978]. {0 .911- 1,S18�I, (0.$et- 1,15 }, {1.OS -1,24} (t.i3 -i,35J 10-'"(n 0 834 0892 1.16 1.29 1.46 7.58 1.70 1.93 1.99 211 _ _ (0.779 -0_999]. (0.925 - 9.0,7} (7.08 -1.25] [1,20.1.39) (1,34.1,58) [1.45- 1.69), (1.56 -1.93] [1,66 -1.96} {1.79 -2.14y 15wrlin 164 1 1.25 I 1.47 1.64 1,64 2,00 2.16 F 2.31 2.SQ 2.65 -__ (0974 -4.12) (1..16 - 1.344) _ (1.37.7.58) (1,52.1,76) (1,74 -1.98} (1,84 -2.15) [7 97.2.31)_ [2,08- 249 }',F(2.25.2,70) (2.37 -2.98) 3�NnIR 1.43 1.72 2409 2.37 2.73 3,01 3,30 3.59 3.99 4,311 (7.34.7.94) (1.81-1.86)) (1.@5.2.25) (220 -2.55) 1[2.52- 2.93)' (2.77 -3.23) (3 02 3.54) [3 263 �) [3.ba -d.26y (3.93-+1,$4) 60•tnlh 1 78 216 268 3.09 364 408 4,54 SA3 4 5.71 8.27 (1.67 -7.92} (2.02-2-33) (2,90-2-88) 1 (2,88-3.32) (3.363.90) -.(3,75.4.38) (4.154.88) {4,57441) I[5.1443.16y, (5.59�.77y 2 -h1 2 11 2,67 3,28 3.07 1 4.72 5,46 6.25 7.12 6.42 8.53 (T.ia$ 2 -38) . (;x.37.2 8'17. [3A2.3.57j (3,554,21) (4.31 -5.13) (4,965.93) � (5,es-s.79} (6.40-7.73)147.4 3 -hr 2 2.74 3,52 4,19 5,17 6.03 7.0@ 8A7 9.71 11.1 (2.092.47) (2.53 -3.00) (x.24.3.94} (3,834.56) (4.71 -5.62) '��(5A7 -6.57) (6.30.7,60} (T,20 -0,75] (8.56 - 40.5 }' 49.70 -42,1) 6-hr - F- 2-9 ~ 3,40~ 4.38 5. 11 f 8.45 7.54 8.76 40.2 12.3 14.2 (2.5g -3.06) (3.153.73) (4- 024.77) (477. 5.68)_ _(b-68 -7.02) (6.84- 8.21) (_7 -91 -9.54) 3.27 F 3.99 F 5.14 6.16 F 7,89 F 9.96 10.6 124 r 15,7 1 17.6 ~'- 1 414501 50144.06) 1 (6.41 -7.79} 1 [7.61.9.27] 93x116) I(1Q.s.73.6] 1112.6 -1s -9 (144 -1%. ),I (17.1-22.6)1(19,426.: 3,dgy 4,e2 6.82 7.41 x.79 19.9 iza _i4 7-F 17A 20.4 23.6 _ (4A25.33) _(5.33.8.43} (s.ri -e.20} (6.no.9,72) I {ct a ta,r} ;13 a1s_3y 114 a 1s:s }. f17.5 23.x) (ta.7 -z6.; 5.91 6.18 7.80 Iy 9.24 11.3 4-day 131 1G,1 17.3 1 20,7 23.7 _- _ - -_ (4_6]-5.64) {5.65.8.89} (7.13. 5.62.) .6 (B. .2) 002 -12.5} (t1.7 -14.5} 10$A-16Z) ( 752- 19.3}I(t7.923.3)I(20.1-26.1 ?-day 6.87 F 7.08 F 8.90 F 10.4 12-7 F - 14.5 F 18.8 F la -a IF 22.1- - F 24,8- (5.43,8.47) (6.55 -7.72) (8.22.9.77) {9.59.11.4} (11.6 -13.8) (132 -18.9) (14.9 -18.1) ( 16720.6 )'(193- 24.4)',{21.4,27.4 Lo 12.41 10d" (61.9 4] (7- 3&s. 9262) : (9.99- 10.74_ 1721 814.9] 114.314.1 15 -1947 57752879] 09825.7!! y25 �1 29-da 868 10.6 12.9 14,9 17,5 19.8 22t 24,7 28.3 31.2 _ _ y _ (8 -29-9.56) (9,W -11.4) (12.0.13,9) j 1(1&2-21.3) 1(202-24.0) (22,3- 28.BJ. [25.2 -31 Oy (27.534.e 80 day 10.9 13.0 45,6 17.7 20.6 23,0 26.4 27.9 31.4 341 (10.3 -11.7) (12.2 -13.9) (14.8- 16.5) (18,9-14.9) l (19.3 -22.0) ( 21.3 - 24.8) (23.4.272} 125.0 -30.OJ (26.4 -34,Q] ,(34:6 -37� -day 13.6 16:1 19.7 21,5 24 8 27,5 30,2 33,0 36.9 38,8 (12.G-14-5) (152 -17.1) (19.0 -24,3) (20.3 - ,22,9) (23.3 -26,4) (25.7.29.3] (29.132.3] (34,435.4) (33.6.39.7] (38,0 -43. 60 -day 16.4 19.3 226 26.4 28.6 31.4 34.1 36.6 40.4 43.1 (15.5 -17.4) (18.2 -20.4) (21.3- 23.9)_, (23.7 -26.9 (26.930.4} (29.4 -33.3) (37.8-38,3) (34.179 -3) (37.1.43,4). (39,446.[ Precipllalion frequency (PF) estlmaraa in Ibis tabre are based on frequenoy anatysis of paAral duration cedes (Pp5). l urnbers in parenthasis are PF astimales al lower and upper bounds of fie 90% corifidence inlerval_ The prahabLry that precipitation frequancy 99mames (fora given duration aria average recurenca interval),4 brs greater Than the uppef bound (oriess than the rawer bound) is 5 %. '.stim mes at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipllalian (PM P] asfimales and may be hig1wr than currenily valid PMP glues, lease refer to NGAA Allas 14 document for more inrornrat+on. PF graphical Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 i of ITEM: 7 - 10 - 21 5/13020, S:1Cw AM 24-hr - 0_50A18) (4.25 -520) - (SAS -672Y (6.56905) (8.18�Y O.tY f9.56 -17.97 (11.7�14.0�[� 8.45 {15420.21 1(17 ?5 -23.7) --- I ~'- 1 414501 50144.06) 1 (6.41 -7.79} 1 [7.61.9.27] 93x116) I(1Q.s.73.6] 1112.6 -1s -9 (144 -1%. ),I (17.1-22.6)1(19,426.: 3,dgy 4,e2 6.82 7.41 x.79 19.9 iza _i4 7-F 17A 20.4 23.6 _ (4A25.33) _(5.33.8.43} (s.ri -e.20} (6.no.9,72) I {ct a ta,r} ;13 a1s_3y 114 a 1s:s }. f17.5 23.x) (ta.7 -z6.; 5.91 6.18 7.80 Iy 9.24 11.3 4-day 131 1G,1 17.3 1 20,7 23.7 _- _ - -_ (4_6]-5.64) {5.65.8.89} (7.13. 5.62.) .6 (B. .2) 002 -12.5} (t1.7 -14.5} 10$A-16Z) ( 752- 19.3}I(t7.923.3)I(20.1-26.1 ?-day 6.87 F 7.08 F 8.90 F 10.4 12-7 F - 14.5 F 18.8 F la -a IF 22.1- - F 24,8- (5.43,8.47) (6.55 -7.72) (8.22.9.77) {9.59.11.4} (11.6 -13.8) (132 -18.9) (14.9 -18.1) ( 16720.6 )'(193- 24.4)',{21.4,27.4 Lo 12.41 10d" (61.9 4] (7- 3&s. 9262) : (9.99- 10.74_ 1721 814.9] 114.314.1 15 -1947 57752879] 09825.7!! y25 �1 29-da 868 10.6 12.9 14,9 17,5 19.8 22t 24,7 28.3 31.2 _ _ y _ (8 -29-9.56) (9,W -11.4) (12.0.13,9) j 1(1&2-21.3) 1(202-24.0) (22,3- 28.BJ. [25.2 -31 Oy (27.534.e 80 day 10.9 13.0 45,6 17.7 20.6 23,0 26.4 27.9 31.4 341 (10.3 -11.7) (12.2 -13.9) (14.8- 16.5) (18,9-14.9) l (19.3 -22.0) ( 21.3 - 24.8) (23.4.272} 125.0 -30.OJ (26.4 -34,Q] ,(34:6 -37� -day 13.6 16:1 19.7 21,5 24 8 27,5 30,2 33,0 36.9 38,8 (12.G-14-5) (152 -17.1) (19.0 -24,3) (20.3 - ,22,9) (23.3 -26,4) (25.7.29.3] (29.132.3] (34,435.4) (33.6.39.7] (38,0 -43. 60 -day 16.4 19.3 226 26.4 28.6 31.4 34.1 36.6 40.4 43.1 (15.5 -17.4) (18.2 -20.4) (21.3- 23.9)_, (23.7 -26.9 (26.930.4} (29.4 -33.3) (37.8-38,3) (34.179 -3) (37.1.43,4). (39,446.[ Precipllalion frequency (PF) estlmaraa in Ibis tabre are based on frequenoy anatysis of paAral duration cedes (Pp5). l urnbers in parenthasis are PF astimales al lower and upper bounds of fie 90% corifidence inlerval_ The prahabLry that precipitation frequancy 99mames (fora given duration aria average recurenca interval),4 brs greater Than the uppef bound (oriess than the rawer bound) is 5 %. '.stim mes at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipllalian (PM P] asfimales and may be hig1wr than currenily valid PMP glues, lease refer to NGAA Allas 14 document for more inrornrat+on. PF graphical Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 i of ITEM: 7 - 10 - 21 5/13020, S:1Cw AM Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 22 -------- Board ofCommissioners July 13.2020 ITEM: 7 10 23 el 40 � � EXHIBIT B Cape Fear Engineering Preliminary Routing Analysis Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 24 Watershed Model Schematic Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk@ Civil 3D@ 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 U,3 - DEVELOPMENT Legend Hvd• Origin Description 1 SCS Runoff PRE - DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff POST - DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir ROUTED �OST- DEVELOPMENT 3- ROUTED 10 Project: C:\ Users \haleym\ Desktop \dema rest 0N'*"bp�l13, 2020 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 25 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 0.149 2 752 2,713 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE- DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 4.611 2 724 15,260 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 0.096 2 1346 12,058 2 25.23 12,515 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oar (216G5mmissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 26 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type =SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.149 cfs Storm frequency =2 yrs Time to peak = 12.53 hrs Time interval =2min Hyd. volume = 2,713 cuft Drainage area =3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope =0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method =User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 4.50in Distribution = Type III Storm duration =24hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd.No.1 - 2 Year 0.05 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Hyd No. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 27 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 F7`1 - 0.00 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 4.50 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 rev "I Post - Development Hyd. No. 2 - 2 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 4.611 cfs = 724 min = 15,260 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 28 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 -POST DEV. Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 ' 0 600 Hyd No. 3 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 0.096 cfs = 1346 min = 12,058 cuft = 25.23 ft = 12,515 cuft Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 _' '�' ' 0.00 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600 4200 4800 5400 6000 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 2.402 2 734 13,894 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE - DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 12.14 2 724 36,822 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 1.464 2 772 33,400 2 25.48 17,538 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oard 6 #)Manmissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 30 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.402 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 12.23 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 13,894 cuft Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year 6 8 10 12 14 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 31 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 7.00 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 . M 4.00 2.00 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 12.14 cfs = 724 min = 36,822 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 lllll� 4.00 2.00 0.00 ' y ' ' ' ' ' 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 32 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - POST - DEVELOPMENT Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 11 • 11 4.00 2.00 0.00 0 600 Hyd No. 3 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 1.464 cfs = 772 min = 33,400 cuft = 25.48 ft = 17,538 cuft Q (cfs) 14.00 12.00 10.00 93 11 • 11 4.00 2.00 ' ' 0.00 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600 4200 4800 5400 6000 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 4.124 2 732 20,445 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE- DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 15.66 2 724 47,068 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 2.351 2 756 43,629 2 25.67 21,421 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oad &)M nmissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 34 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 4.124 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 12.20 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 20,445 cuft Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 8.05 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 rev "S PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 1 -- 25 Year Q (cfs) 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 1 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 35 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 8.05 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 3.00 0.00 ' ' 0 120 240 Hyd No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 15.66 cfs = 724 min = 47,068 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 3.00 i i I I I I I 1 0.00 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 36 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - POST - DEVELOPMENT Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 3.00 0.00 0 600 Hyd No. 3 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 2.351 cfs = 756 min = 43,629 cuft = 25.67 ft = 21,421 cuft Q (cfs) 18.00 15.00 12.00 . 11 3.00 0.00 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600 4200 4800 5400 6000 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 5.916 2 730 27,103 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE- DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 18.96 2 724 56,745 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 2.920 2 754 53,295 2 25.88 25,825 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oad6 #)Manmissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 38 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 5.916 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 12.17 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 27,103 cuft Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 9.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 ' ' 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 6 8 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 1 -- 50 Year Q (cfs) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 i . I I I I I I I. 1 0.00 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 39 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 18.96 cfs Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 56,745 cuft Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number = 63* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 9.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 . 11 3.00 rev" POST - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 -- 50 Year Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 91.1 11 3.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 40 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - POST - DEVELOPMENT Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 . 11 3.00 0.00 ' ' — 0 480 Hyd No. 3 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 -- 50 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 2.920 cfs = 754 min = 53,295 cuft = 25.88 ft = 25,825 cuft Q (cfs) 21.00 18.00 15.00 12.00 • 11 91.1 11 3.00 ' 0.00 1440 1920 2400 2880 3360 3840 4320 4800 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 8.022 2 730 34,756 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE - DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 22.51 2 724 67,264 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 4.071 2 752 63,804 2 26.09 30,664 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oard 60E rnissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 42 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 8.022 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.17 hrs Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 34,756 cuft Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. = 10.00 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 10.00 um . 11 4.00 2.00 0.00 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 6 8 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 10.00 lllll11 . 11 4.00 2.00 0.00 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 43 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 10.00 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 4.00 0.00 ' ' 0 120 240 Hyd No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 22.51 cfs = 724 min = 67,264 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 4.00 — ' ' ' ' -'1 0.00 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 44 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - POST - DEVELOPMENT Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. ROUTED Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 4.071 cfs = 752 min = 63,804 cuft = 26.09 ft = 30,664 cuft Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Year Q (cfs) 24.00 24.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 16.00 12.00 12.00 8.00 8.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0 240 480 720 960 1200 1440 1680 1920 2160 2400 2640 2880 Time (min) Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 29.00 2 730 112,699 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE - DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 52.45 2 724 159,500 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 22.69 2 734 155,985 2 27.08 58,509 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oarS600,498rnissioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 46 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCSRunoff Peak discharge = 29.00 cfs Storm frequency =500 yrs Time to peak = 12.17 hrs Time interval =2min Hyd. volume = 112,699 cuft Drainage area =3.730 ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope =0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method =User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. =18.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration =24hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 ' ' 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 6 8 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd.No.1 - 500Year Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 .r I I I I I I 1 0.00 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 47 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 18.10 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 FA� 30.00 20.00 10.00 POST DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 - 500 year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 52.45 cfs = 724 min = 159,500 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 48 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 500 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 -POST DEV. Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 FA� 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 ' 0 120 240 Hyd No. 3 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 - 500 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 22.69 cfs = 734 min = 155,985 cuft = 27.08 ft = 58,509 cuft Q (cfs) 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Summary Report ydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cult) Hydrograph Description 1 SCS Runoff 37.92 2 728 146,063 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PRE - DEVELOPMENT 2 SCS Runoff 63.67 2 724 195,347 - - - - -- - - - - -- POST- DEVELOPMENT 3 Reservoir 35.23 2 730 191,820 2 27.26 64,723 ROUTED Demarest Pointe Preliminary oard 6000jeWssioners - July 13, 20 OWednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 50 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Hyd. No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type =SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 37.92 cfs Storm frequency =1000 yrs Time to peak = 12.13 hrs Time interval =2 min Hyd. volume = 146,063 cuft Drainage area = 3.730ac Curve number = 42* Basin Slope =0.0% Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method =User Time of conc. (Tc) = 10.00 min Total precip. =21.10 in Distribution = Type III Storm duration =24 hrs Shape factor = 484 " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(0.200 x 98) + (3.530 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 ' ' 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 PRE - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 1 -1000 Year Q (cfs) 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 51 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 2 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1000 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Drainage area = 3.730 ac Curve number Basin Slope = 0.0% Hydraulic length Tc method = User Time of conc. (Tc) Total precip. = 21.10 in Distribution Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor " Composite (Area /CN) _ [(1.490 x 98) + (2.240 x 39)] / 3.730 Q (cfs) 70.00 .1 11 50.00 G 1 11 30.00 1 11 1 11 POST - DEVELOPMENT Hyd. No. 2 - 1000 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 63.67 cfs = 724 min = 195,347 cuft = 63* = 0 ft = 5.00 min = Type I I I = 484 Q (cfs) 70.00 •1 11 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Hyd No. 2 Time (min) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 52 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Hyd. No. 3 ROUTED Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 1000 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - POST -DEV Max. Elevation Reservoir name = POND #1 Max. Storage Storage Indication method used Q (cfs) 70.00 .1 11 50.00 G 1 11 30.00 1 11 1 11 ROUTED Hyd. No. 3 -- 1000 Year Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 = 35.23 cfs = 730 min = 191,820 cuft = 27.26 ft = 64,723 cuft Q (cfs) 70.00 •1 11 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 1 1 1 1 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Pond No. 1 - POND #1 Pond Data Contours - User - defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 24.50 ft Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) 0.00 24.50 0.50 25.00 1.50 26.00 2.50 27.00 3.00 27.50 Contour area (sqft) 13,988 16,908 24,075 31,512 35,345 Incr. Storage (cuft) 0 7,724 20,492 27,794 16,714 Total storage (cuft) 0 7,724 28,216 56,009 72,723 Culvert / Orifice Structures 0 24.50 0.00 Weir Structures 0.05 772 24.55 0.00 [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] 0.01 [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 18.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 4.00 12.00 25.00 0.00 Span (in) = 18.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 25.25 25.75 26.75 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 2.60 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 24.50 24.50 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = 1 Rect Broad - -- Length (ft) = 30.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes Yes No No Slope ( %) = 0.30 0.00 0.00 n/a 0.84 oc 1.00 17,970 25.50 N -Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a 2.11 oc 1.20 22,068 25.70 Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in /hr) = 0.000 (by Contour) 1.40 26,166 Multi -Stage = n/a Yes No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 oc 1.60 30,995 Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 24.50 0.00 0.00 0.05 772 24.55 0.00 oc 0.10 1,545 24.60 0.01 oc 0.15 2,317 24.65 0.02 oc 0.20 3,090 24.70 0.02 oc 0.25 3,862 24.75 0.03 oc 0.30 4,634 24.80 0.03 oc 0.35 5,407 24.85 0.03 oc 0.40 6,179 24.90 0.03 oc 0.45 6,952 24.95 0.04 oc 0.50 7,724 25.00 0.04 oc 0.60 9,773 25.10 0.04 oc 0.70 11,822 25.20 0.05 oc 0.80 13,871 25.30 0.20 oc 0.90 15,921 25.40 0.84 oc 1.00 17,970 25.50 1.65 oc 1.10 20,019 25.60 2.11 oc 1.20 22,068 25.70 2.46 oc 1.30 24,117 25.80 2.76 oc 1.40 26,166 25.90 2.95 oc 1.50 28,216 26.00 3.00 oc 1.60 30,995 26.10 4.24 oc 1.70 33,774 26.20 5.27 oc 1.80 36,554 26.30 6.14 oc 1.90 39,333 26.40 6.90 oc 2.00 42,112 26.50 7.58 oc 2.10 44,892 26.60 8.21 oc 2.20 47,671 26.70 8.79 oc 2.30 50,450 26.80 9.34 oc 2.40 53,230 26.90 9.85 oc 2.50 56,009 27.00 10.34 oc 2.55 57,680 27.05 10.58 oc 2.60 59,352 27.10 10.81 oc 2.65 61,023 27.15 11.04 oc 2.70 62,695 27.20 11.26 oc 2.75 64,366 27.25 11.47 oc 2.80 66,038 27.30 11.69 oc 2.85 67,709 27.35 11.90 oc 0.00 - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.000 0.00 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.003 0.01 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.011 0.02 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.017 0.02 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.022 0.02 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.025 0.03 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.028 0.03 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.031 0.03 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.033 0.04 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.036 0.04 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.038 0.04 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.042 0.05 is - -- - -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.046 0.05 is - -- - -- 0.15 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.194 0.04 is - -- - -- 0.77 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 0.811 0.03 is - -- - -- 1.61 s 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 1.638 0.02 is - -- - -- 2.09s 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 2.115 0.02 is - -- - -- 2.44s 0.00 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 2.460 0.01 is - -- - -- 2.32s 0.43s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 2.761 0.01 is - -- - -- 1.86s 1.08s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 2.952 0.00 is - -- - -- 1.58s 1.39s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 2.984 0.01 is - -- - -- 1.99s 2.22s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 4.218 0.01 is - -- - -- 2.28s 2.97s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 5.252 0.01 is - -- - -- 2.48s 3.62s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 6.111 0.00 is - -- - -- 2.66s 4.22s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 6.891 0.00 is - -- - -- 2.80s 4.75s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 7.560 0.00 is - -- - -- 2.93s 5.25s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 8.191 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.04s 5.69s 0.00 - -- - -- - -- 8.732 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.17s 6.15s 0.73 - -- - -- - -- 10.05 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.28s 6.57s 3.78 - -- - -- - -- 13.63 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.36s 6.93s 8.13 - -- - -- - -- 18.42 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.40s 7.09s 10.68 - -- - -- - -- 21.17 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.46s 7.31 s 13.46 - -- - -- - -- 24.24 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.49s 7.44s 16.44 - -- - -- - -- 27.37 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.55s 7.65s 19.62 - -- - -- - -- 30.82 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.60s 7.84s 22.98 - -- - -- - -- 34.43 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.66s 8.03s 26.51 - -- - -- - -- 38.20 0.00 is - -- - -- 3.65s 8.08s 30.21 - -- - -- - -- 41.94 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Continues on next page... ITEM: 7 - 10 - 54 POND #1 Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs 2.90 69,380 27.40 12.10 oc 0.00 is - -- 2.95 71,052 27.45 12.30 oc 0.00 is - -- 3.00 72,723 27.50 12.50 oc 0.00 is - -- ... End PrfRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs - -- 3.69s 8.24s 34.06 - -- - -- - -- 46.00 - -- 3.73s 8.40s 38.07 - -- - -- - -- 50.20 - -- 3.77s 8.55s 42.22 - -- - -- - -- 54.54 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 55 Hydraflow Rainfall Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2019.2 Wednesday, 06 / 24 / 2020 Return Period Intensity- Duration - Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) (Yrs) B D E (N /A) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- - - - - -- 2 171.3185 25.1001 0.9905 -- - - - - -- 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- - - - - -- 5 164.8976 26.4001 0.9324 -- - - - - -- 10 161.1999 26.6001 0.8991 -- - - - - -- 25 185.0618 28.2001 0.8916 -- - - - - -- 50 201.4255 29.2001 0.8841 -- - - - - -- 100 215.5537 29.8001 0.8767 -- - - - - -- File name: NEW HANOVER COUNTY.IDF Intensity = B / (Tc + D) "E Return Period Intensity Values (in /hr) (Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 5.88 5.05 4.42 3.94 3.55 3.23 2.96 2.74 2.54 2.38 2.23 2.10 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 6.63 5.78 5.12 4.61 4.19 3.84 3.55 3.30 3.08 2.89 2.73 2.58 10 7.23 6.33 5.65 5.10 4.65 4.28 3.97 3.70 3.46 3.26 3.08 2.92 25 8.15 7.19 6.44 5.84 5.35 4.94 4.59 4.29 4.03 3.80 3.59 3.41 50 8.87 7.86 7.07 6.43 5.90 5.46 5.08 4.76 4.47 4.22 4.00 3.80 100 9.60 8.53 7.69 7.01 6.44 5.97 5.56 5.21 4.91 4.64 4.40 4.18 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60. Precip. file name: L: \Civil \CALCS \STORMWATER \IDF CURVES FOR HYDRAFLOW \NEW HANOVER COUNTY.pcp Storm Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Distribution 1 -yr 2 -yr 3 -yr 5 -yr 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr SCS 24 -hour 18.10 21.10 4.50 0.00 7.00 8.05 9.00 10.00 SCS 6 -Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.00 f omOmissi -Jul 02 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 i�M: 7Q- 7 � - 6 0360 0.00 EXHIBIT C FEMA Floodmaps Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 57 A Classic American Neighborhood 5 us to, nobiIity- Diversity -EcoI o gy -co n Redivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound I 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Slmel, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue W Ilminglon, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMMUTODMI'MY Co,l - ,a�lhhl lwd'In- ASLI BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, Nonni Carolina 28401 III-11T TITI t R 2 S T P O I N T E c. DWG TITLE MIDDLE SOUND COMMUNITY TOWNHOMES FLOOD MAP GRAPHIC SCALE'. APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: REF. NO. i oQ- x}17 DATE: 31281 20 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. EXHIBIT D Atlantic Coast Survey — Downstream Survey Information Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 59 Atiantic Coast Survey, PLLC Professional Land Surveyors PO Box 12588 (910) 443-0080 Wilmington, NC 28405 Report of Survey Date- June 3, 2020 Property Location/Address- Bedford Road Survey Task Requested: Measure top of pavement elevation at the intersection of Bedford Road and Parliament Drive, Wilmington, NC 28411 and identify the base flood elevation at the same location. Field measurements were made on June 1, 2020 and the pavement elevation at this intersection was found to be 6.0 feet referenced to N.A.V.D 1988 datum. According to F.I.R.M. map #3720316900 K, Effective Date 8/28/2018, the base flood elevation at that location is 13.0 feet. It was also noted that the horizontal distance from this location is approximately 0.65 mile from the intersection of Middle Sound Loop Road and Pickway Court. CA R- 0 srri N•• SEAL L-,3937 SU. Signed & Sealed this 3rd day of June, 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 60 Northing: = 192,239, Easting = 2,361,908 Northing: = 192,239, Easting = 2,365,377 Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) y With BFE or Depth q M s Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard ' Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Areas Determined to be Outside the 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Jurisdiction Boundary FIRM Panel Boundary " North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet gone 3200) - Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical) '" v - •'� 6 finc1- 600teat IM15U _ 0 Mi 250 500 feet 0 25 50 100 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM �► •.a4411 N t [Cf FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP ' 4i 1. JbIll; 0 Panel (s):3169,3168 �� � � r I • R , � 3 � CONTAINS: Q COMMUNITY CID NEW HANOVER 370168 COUNTY All F a _ J41110 Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown e below be should used when placing map i - orders; the Community Number(s) shown above should be used on insurance F.- �_ applications for the subject community. SELECTED PANELS: `• a, MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE 3720316900K 8/28/2018 0 3720316800K 8/28/2018 cc 1 r. Je AL i e rwA 3 Northing: = 188,771, Easting = 2,361,908 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 188,771, Easting = 2.365,377 This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps checkihe EEAOAFbod Arap,StO`e,at Wy[W,gtsC,.fem��� 13, 2020 FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program`"` ' Page 2of26, s! Panel(s):3169,3168 CONTAINS: COMMUNITY CID NEW HANOVER COUNTY 370168 Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s) shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. SELECTED PANELS: MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE 3720316900K 8/28/2018 3720316800K 8/28/2018 NOTES TO USERS This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective digital flood hazard data available at http: / /fris.nc.gov /fris. Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths, information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at http: / /fris.nc.gov /fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with data available in the FIS. NOTES TO USERS Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and federal agencies, and /or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred source for development of the base map. See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as corporate limits, are based on the most up -to -date data available at the time of publication. Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description, and /or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713 -3242, or visit its website at http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/. MORE INFORMATION Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA) 1- 877 - 336 -2627 hftp://msc.fema.gov/ Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) 919 - 715 -5711 www.ncfloodmaps.com Flood Insurance Availability North Carolina Division of Emergency Management (NCDEM) 919 - 715 -5711 htti)://www.nccrimecontrol.org/nfip National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 1 -877- 638 -6620 hftp://www.fema.gov/business/nfip Questions about this FIRMette 1- 877 - 336 -2627 htti)://fema.gov Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 62 EXHIBIT E Receiving Watershed Information Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 63 61W020 Half Mile From: rodney @csd- engineering.coni To. scottstewart5933@yahoo.corn Cc- howard @CSD- ENGINEERING.CQM Date: Monday, May 18, 2020, 10:52 AM EDT Scott, Yahoo Mail - Half Mile I pulled the dimension from Pages Creek and Howe Creek and they're both over 0.5 mile using the DEQ website. Rodney Wright 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 910 791 4441 office 910 791 1501 fax www.csd- engineering.com It is the professional opinion of CSD Engineering that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It is the responsibility of the receiver of this document to examine it and determine whether it is the information requested. In the deliverance of this file we make no promise as to the usability or compatibility of this file. This file shall not be considered a certified document. hal f_m i ie_Pages_Cree k. pcif 121.8k8 half_mile_Fiowe_Creek.pdf 13431<13 image001.png 5.7kB Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 64 « ® ®\ !_ #+J 1 wa 4 pa I La me nk % Lp lb W Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 65 Miles - Meanummern Result 0.67 Miles rApoing "Se �, V, G�OD Alf �5 ff ZN %11 i�, ell "I .1 101 4� le 4 Measurement I Miles 1161, ell, Measurement Resuft CC Ra 'IV 0.65 Miles 7y 0 ad (A C.Oleswo rV? 13, p). pi's t f 'jjsan CrEL_, 'rt Ur CJ Preaq CTRUo erable si,.appirg rp Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 --:10 266 6/9/2420 Re: Demarest Pointe From: Moul, Robert (ronoul @lmgroup.net) To: scottstewart6933@yahoo.com -c: pfarley @imgroup.net [late: Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 10:31 AM EDT Yahoo Mail - Re: Dernarest Pointe Hi Scott: it was nice to speak yesterday and get caught up with family items, Time sure does fly! I measured the three closest estuarine water points from the Demarest Pointe project. All are greater than .5 mile away. Pages Creek- the closest point is at the end of a Haven Way lot along the edge of a channelized tributary. I measured 2710 or (.51 mile) away, where Pages Creek crosses Middle Sound Loop Road I measured 3840 (72 mile) away. Howe Creek- the closest point was 3335 If or (.63 mile) away at the end of Timber Creek Lane. These measurements are off of google earth maps and as the crow flies so they are the most restrictive interpretations. Therefore the project appears to lie outside of the .5 mile radius. Best regards, Rob Moul Senior Consultant Land Management Group 910- 471 -0501 On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:41 AM Scott Stewart <scottstewart6933 yahoo.com> wrote: Rob, Attached please find Middlesound LLC " Demarest Pointe" Exhibits 1 -25 currently scheduled for Conditional Rezoning 6 -4 -20 Planning Board and 7 -13 -20 Commissioners. Howard Resnick (CSD Engineering) just provided me the stormwater assessment on the storm water program I designed for the site which will accommodate a 100, 500 and 1,000 year storm. Yes.. 1,000 year storm! I can retain 2.1.1 inches on the property which will realize 6 CFS less leaving the site than pre development. I'm actually improving the water quality downstream of the existing ditch that ends up traversing through Queens Pointe and ends up in Pages Creek. This should set a new precedent for NHC. What I'm "triple checking" is the location of Demarest Pointe in relationship to Pages Creek and the 1/2 mile rule.So far, two opinions agree what I arrived at, I'm "at least" half a mile, actually 314 of a mile. Anyway you can Confirm this "in house" for me? If you need to address your time: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, NQ 28411 Attn: Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Member- Manager scottstewart6933 ayahoo.com 910- 231 -2428 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 67 117 EXHIBIT F ECS Soils Report Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 68 gi- ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP ..Setting the Standard for Service„ Geotechnical • Construction Materials - Environmental • Facilities NC Registerey Engineering Firm F -1078 NC Registered Geologists Firer CAN SC Regislered Engmeerinq Firm 3239 June 3, 2020 Mr. Scott D. Stewart Middle Sound, LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Reference: Report of Seasonal High Water Table Estimation and Infiltration Testing Demarest Pointe Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.11777 Dear Mr. Stewart: ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) recently conducted a seasonal high water table (SHWT) estimation and infiltration testing within the stormwater control measure (SCM) area(s) off of Middle Sound Loop Road in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. This letter, with attachments, is the report of our testing. Field Testing On June 1, 2020, ECS conducted an exploration of the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, in accordance with the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual section A -2, at two requested locations shown on the attached Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). ECS used GPS equipment in order to determine the boring locations. The purpose of this exploration was to obtain subsurface information of the in situ soils for the SCM area(s). ECS explored the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions by advancing one hand auger boring into the existing ground surface at each of the requested boring locations. ECS visually classified the subsurface soils and obtained representative samples of each soil type encountered. ECS also recorded the SHWT and groundwater elevation observed at the time of the hand auger borings. The attached Infiltration Testing Form provides a summary of the subsurface conditions encountered at the hand auger boring locations. The SHWT and groundwater elevation was estimated at the boring locations below the existing grade elevation. A summary of the findings are as follows: Location SHWT Groundwater 1 -1 24 inches 38 inches 1 -2 26 inches 55 inches ECS has conducted two infiltration tests utilizing a compact constant head permeameter near the hand auger borings in order to estimate the infiltration rate for the subsurface soils. Infiltration tests are typically conducted at two feet above the SHWT or in the most restrictive soil horizon. Tests in clayey conditions are conducted for durations of up to 30 minutes. If a more precise hydraulic conductivity value is desired for these locations, then ECS recommends collecting samples and performing laboratory permeability testing. ECS Capital Services_ PLLC -ECS Florida, LL %oaEW65 corrimissione�s - JulyS1 Yi%g LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP ww%kTFP,"A1 i ril i fr-V lryro Report of SHWT Estimation and Infiltration Testing Demarest Pointe Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.11777 June 3, 2020 Field Test Results Below is a summary of the infiltration test results: Location Description Depth Inches/ hour 1 -1 Gray clayey SAND 26 inches 0.008 1 -2 Tan /orange /gray CLAY 24 inches <0.001 Infiltration rates and SHWT may vary within the proposed site due to changes in elevation, soil classification and subsurface conditions. ECS recommends that a licensed surveyor provide the elevations of the boring locations. Closure ECS's analysis of the site has been based on our understanding of the site, the project information provided to us, and the data obtained during our exploration. If the project information provided to us is changed, please contact us so that our recommendations can be reviewed and appropriate revisions provided, if necessary. The discovery of any site or subsurface conditions during construction which deviate from the data outlined in this exploration should be reported to us for our review, analysis and revision of our recommendations, if necessary. The assessment of site environmental conditions for the presence of pollutants in the soil and groundwater of the site is beyond the scope of this geotechnical exploration. ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or this project, please contact us. Respectfully, ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP K. Brooks Wall Project Manager bwall(@ecslimited.com 910- 686 -9114 Attachments: Figure 1 - Boring Location Plan Infiltration Testing Form GBA Document W. Brandon Fulton, PSC, PWS, LSS Environmental Department Manager bfulton ()ecslimited.com 704 - 525 -5152 Winslow E. Goins, PE Geotech Department Manager wgoins(o)ecslimited.com 910- 686 -9114 Board of Commissidbers - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 70 Infiltration Testing Form Demarest Pointe Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.11777 June 1, 2020 Location Depth USCS Soil Description 1 -1 0 -24" SM Black /gray silty SAND 24 " -38" SC Gray clayey SAND 38 " -48" CL Gray /orange sandy CLAY Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 24 inches below the existing grade elevation. Groundwater was encountered at 38 inches below the existing grade elevation. Test was conducted at 26 inches below existing grade elevation Infiltration Rate: 0.008 inches per hour Location Depth USCS Soil Description 1 -2 0 -15" SM Black silty SAND 15 " -24" S Black silty SAND (hardpan) 24 " -48" CL Tan /orange /gray sandy CLAY 48 " -55" SC Gray clayey SAND Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 26 inches below the existing grade elevation. Groundwater was encountered at 55 inches below the existing grade elevation. Test was conducted at 24 inches below existing grade elevation Infiltration Rate: <0.001 inches per hour Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 72 EXHIBIT G Conceptual Water Quality Plan Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 75 a � _ ADDITIONAL STORMWATER - REATMENT IN ±2,200 SF RAIN GARDEN O REQUIRED B NCDEQ) (NOT QU YN ) Q ADDITIONAL STORMWATER'~ _ Zz- TREATMENT IN ±300 LF WATER QUALITY SWALE NOT REQUIRED BY NCDEQ) EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 1 POND DISCHARGE MAIN ,r" I _ - .a W. Phi: POOL - ys-f- .vr- - x+ «.v+r"•.: f•� °`""".- 1.iT__+,__l .+'° .- {.�,'iS �I�j �-'y, _ 1,,l t 1 - ``' 't PIPED CONVEYANCE rte'- s. ,NCDEQ REQUIRED SURFACE AREA ±4,800 SF _- .. t 5%'=s S° l �K� ✓ . ` i ti INTO FOREBAY 4 <: w r PROVIDED SURFACE AREA = ±12,500 SF (260% OF REQUIREMENT) • y. ' YF i _ +i t i -lr� �.. �ti _ �• -2. �. _.;�.;. V any 1 ,_ � •` e VEGETATED SHELF kP` - : 3 r• A• ti 1 ` _r IN MAIN POOL t � ADDITIONAL STORMWATER �' 4j (NCDEQ � REQUIREMENT) RAIMENT IN ±3,000 SF RAIN GARDEN ( NO T REQUIRED Y NCDEQ) t v _ . z �ti . �..✓ t r a� } L - `� - - - �1 �'� �I FOREBAY J.i r d �r t� Vy r b -`_ ,'`1 PROPOSE ADDITIONAL ±2,400 SF VEGETATED SHELF IN FOREBAY ADDITIONAL STORMWATER y �t (NOT REQUIRED BY NCDEQ) REATMENT IN ±3,000 SF RAIN GARDEN R (NOT REQUIRED BY NCDEQ) ` f y q � PIPED CONVEYANCE --� z., INTO FO EBA a r . N-1 ~ ` ADDITIONAL STORMWATER REATMENT IN ±3,000 SF RAIN GARDEN (NOT REQUIRED BY NCDEQ) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 76 EXHIBIT H USGS StreamStats Report Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 77 Demarast Pointe - Downstream Drainage Analysis Region ID: NC Workspace ID: NC20200609181643573000 Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 34.27594, - 77.79775 Time: 2020 -06 -09 14:16:30 -0400 �{i�qy` -��� .14 r � ro '�.. �!r •rte Orr J 1 S v �6j s 1 r Am" VJ w Spn -' 13rir.:r Basin Characteristics Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 2.21 square miles PCTREG1 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 1 0 percent PCTREG2 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 2 0 percent PCTREG3 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 3 0 percent PCTREG4 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 4 100 percent PCTREG5 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 5 0 percent Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 78 Parameter Code Parameter Description LC061MP Percentage of impervious area determined from NLCD 2006 impervious dataset 124H50Y Maximum 24 -hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 50 years Peak -Flow Statistics Para meters[Peak Southeast US over 1 sgmi20095158] Value Unit 14.41 percent 10.8 inches Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area 2.21 square miles 1 9000 PCTREG1 Percent Area in Region 1 0 percent 0 100 PCTREG2 Percent Area in Region 2 0 percent 0 100 PCTREG3 Percent Area in Region 3 0 percent 0 100 PCTREG4 Percent Area in Region 4 100 percent 0 100 PCTREG5 Percent Area in Region 5 0 percent 0 100 Peak -Flow Statistics Flow Report[Peak Southeast US over 1 sgmi20095158] PII: Prediction Interval- Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval- Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE Standard Error (other -- see report) Statistic Value Unit PH Plu SEp 2 Year Peak Flood 101 ft ^3 /s 57.9 176 34.5 5 Year Peak Flood 202 ft ^3 /s 117 350 34 10 Year Peak Flood 283 ft " 3 /s 161 498 35.1 25 Year Peak Flood 397 ft ^3 /s 218 723 37.5 50 Year Peak Flood 497 ft ^3 /s 264 935 39.6 100 Year Peak Flood 609 ft ^3 /s 313 1180 41.9 200 Year Peak Flood 713 ft ^3 /s 353 1440 44.3 500 Year Peak Flood 873 ft ^3 /s 412 1850 47.7 Peak -Flow Statistics Citations Weaver, J.C., Feaster, T.D., and Gotvald, A.J.,2009, Magnitude and frequency of rural floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006 — Volume 2, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 79 Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009 -5158, 111 p. ( http: / /pubs.usgs.gov /sir/2009/5158/) USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the software has been subjected to rigorous review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use. USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Application Version: 4.3.11 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 10 - 80 �� : This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post- consumer content. Prod ect #. 200221 All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is 100% recyclable. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 1 0-) DAVENPORT Technical Memorandum Demarest Pointe New Hanover County, NC Prepared for Middlesound, LLC June 25, 2020 Analysis by: Tou Lee, El Drafting /Graphics by: Tou Lee, El Reviewed by: Robert K. Gey, PE Sealed by: Robert K. Gey, PE CARP ' -OoFESSi ° /'Ly _ .•e CFAI `•. - 6/25/2020 1� ❑�❑ S This report is printed on recycled paper with 30% post- consumer content. All paper is FSC Certified. The entire document, including binding, is 100% recyclable. 2■ This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT shall be without liability to DAVENPORT and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 2 DAVENPORT Intersection Capacity Analysis for Demarest Pointe Technical Memorandum DAVENPORT Project Number 200221 Prepared for Middlesound, LLC June 25, 2020 Introduction DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of the Demarest Pointe project at the roundabout of Middle Sound Loop Road and Darden Road and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. The proposed project is to be located north -east of the existing Ogden Elementary School in New Hanover County, NC. The project proposes 24 dwelling units of townhomes. Two (2) new restricted site access points are proposed. A right -in only site access is proposed to be located approximately 540 feet east of the existing roundabout at Middle Sound Loop Road and Darden Road. A right -out only site access is proposed to be located approximately 418 feet south of the roundabout. Executive Summary and Conclusion DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this project and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. Based on the trip generation rates and equations published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition), this development has a trip generation potential of 141 daily trips, 12 trips (3 entering 9 exiting) in the AM peak hour and 17 trips (11 entering 6 exiting) in the PM peak hour. Roundabout Capacity Analysis Overall, the study intersection currently operates at level of service (LOS) D in the AM peak hour and B during the PM peak hour, as shown in Table 2. In 2022 future no build conditions (without the project site trips) LOS E is expected in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour. In 2022 future build conditions (which includes the proposed Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.937 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 3 Demarest Pointe Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Two -Way Land Use ITE Land Code Size Method /Type Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Townhomes 220 124] Dwelling Units Adjacent/ Equation 141 3 9 11 6 Total Trips 141 3 9 11 6 Roundabout Capacity Analysis Overall, the study intersection currently operates at level of service (LOS) D in the AM peak hour and B during the PM peak hour, as shown in Table 2. In 2022 future no build conditions (without the project site trips) LOS E is expected in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour. In 2022 future build conditions (which includes the proposed Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.937 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 3 0 DAVENPORT project site trips) the LOS is expected to remain unchanged. Overall, a slight increase (1.9 seconds per vehicle AM and 0.3 seconds per vehicle PM) in delay is expected at the roundabout. DAVENPORT is in agreement with NCDOT study, dated February 1, 2018 and conclusions regarding the Demarest Pointe development. Safety The right -in and right -out driveways paired with the roundabout, provides excellent access management which significantly improves safety when compared to traditional full movement access. Studies have shown that left turns account for 72% of driveway crashes for driveways located near intersections. Left turn movements are typically associated with angle crashes which can often result in injuries. Right turns are more often associated with rear end or sideswipe crashes typically resulting in property damage only. Conclusion In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of both background traffic and proposed development traffic. There is negligible impact from traffic generated by this development and no traffic mitigation measures are recommended. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 4 Table 2 - Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road (ROUNDABOUT) Level of Service by Approach Overall _31111111111l (Delay in secIveh) Scenario • S A"WIMME Northbound Southbound AM Peak Hour L T R L T R L T R L T R 2020 D A A A F F F C C C D D D Base (31.6) 9.3 9.3 9.3 66.2 66.2 66.2 22.8 22.8 22.8 28.7 28.7 28.7 A (9.3) F (66.2) C (22.8) D (28.7) L T R L T R L T R L T R 2022 E A A A F F F D D D D D D Future (40.5) 9.9 9.9 9.9 91.0 91.0 91.0 27.9 27.9 27.9 31.6 31.6 31.6 No Build A (9.9) F (91.0) D (27.9) D (31.6) L T R L T R L T R L T R 2022 E A A A F F F D D D D D D Future 42.4 ( ) 9.9 9.9 9.9 96.0 96.0 96.0 29.9 29.9 29.9 32.2 32.2 32.2 Build A (9.9) F (96.0) D (29.9) D (32.2) PM Peak Hour L T R L T R L T R L T R 2020 B B B B A A A A A A A A A Base (11.1) 14.0 14.0 14.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 9.2 9.2 9.2 7.4 7.4 7.4 B (14.0) A (7.7) A (9.2) A (7.4) L T R L T R L T R L T R 2022 B C C C A A A A A A A A A 2022 Future No Build 12.2 ( ) (15.5) 15.5 (15.5) 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.9 9.9 9.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 C (15.5) A (8.2) A (9.9) A (7.8) L T R L 1 T R L T R L T R 2022 B C C C A A A B B B A A B Future 2022 12.5 ( ) 16.0 16.0 16.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 7.9 7.9 11.8 Build C (16.0) A (8.2) B (10.2) A (7.9) Safety The right -in and right -out driveways paired with the roundabout, provides excellent access management which significantly improves safety when compared to traditional full movement access. Studies have shown that left turns account for 72% of driveway crashes for driveways located near intersections. Left turn movements are typically associated with angle crashes which can often result in injuries. Right turns are more often associated with rear end or sideswipe crashes typically resulting in property damage only. Conclusion In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of both background traffic and proposed development traffic. There is negligible impact from traffic generated by this development and no traffic mitigation measures are recommended. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 4 0 DAVENPORT Methodology Figure 1 in the Supporting Documents illustrates the site plan. The vicinity map and the existing lane geometry are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively. Traffic counts collected on December 12, 2017 were used to determine the 2020 base volumes at this study intersection. A 2% annual growth rate, given from a NCDOT previous study, dated February 1, 2018, was applied to the 2017 traffic to obtain the 2020 base volumes. The 2017 count and method were used to reflect the traffic conditions prior to COVID -19 pandemic. The 2020 base volumes were projected out to a future analysis year of 2022 by applying a 2% annual traffic growth rate. 2020 base volumes and 2022 future no build volumes are shown for AM and PM peaks in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. The trip generation potential for this site was projected based on the 1011 edition of ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 1 presents the results. Site trips for this project were distributed based on the existing traffic patterns and engineering judgment. The trip distribution model is shown in Figure 6. The 2022 build -out traffic volumes were obtained by summing the 2022 future no build volumes and site trips generated by the proposed project. Site trips are shown in Figure 7. The 2022 future build volumes are shown for AM and PM peaks in Figure 8. SIDRA 8.0 was used to determine the level of service of the study intersection. Queue lengths were also reviewed based on SIDRA 8.0 results. Based on NCDOT standards, roundabout environmental factor would be adjusted to 1.2 to reflect U.S. drivers' inexperience with roundabout driving. In this specific location, this roundabout has been in place for 10 years. Therefore, based on engineering judgement, the environmental factor was adjusted to 1.0 to reflect the familiarity of the roundabout. In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted NCDOT standards. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.937 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 5 Serving the Southeast since 2002 9 Table 1 - ITE Trip Generation Demarest Pointe Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Two -Way Land Use ITE Land Code Size Method /Type Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Townhomes 220 24 Dwelling Units Adjacent/ Equation 141 3 9 1 11 6 Total Trips 141 3 9 11 6 SIDRA 8.0 was used to determine the level of service of the study intersection. Queue lengths were also reviewed based on SIDRA 8.0 results. Based on NCDOT standards, roundabout environmental factor would be adjusted to 1.2 to reflect U.S. drivers' inexperience with roundabout driving. In this specific location, this roundabout has been in place for 10 years. Therefore, based on engineering judgement, the environmental factor was adjusted to 1.0 to reflect the familiarity of the roundabout. In general, the analysis for this project was conducted utilizing commonly accepted NCDOT standards. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.937 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 5 Serving the Southeast since 2002 9 0 DAVENPORT The following intersection was included in the study: 1. Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road (ROUNDABOUT) The intersections were analyzed during the AM (7 -9 am) and PM (4 -6 pm) peaks for the following conditions: • 2020 Base Conditions • 2022 Future No -Build Conditions • 2022 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Overall, the study intersection currently operates at level of service (LOS) D and B during the AM and PM peak hours respectively, as shown in Table 2 on the next page. In 2022 future no build conditions (without the project site trips) LOS E is expected in the AM peak and LOS B in the PM peak. In 2022 future build conditions (which includes the proposed project site trips) the LOS is expected to remain unchanged. Overall, a slight increase (2 seconds per vehicle AM and 0.3 seconds per vehicle PM) in delay is expected at the intersection. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 6 Serving the Southeast since 2002 4 Table 2 - Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road (ROUNDABOUT) Level of Service by Approach Overall (Delay in sec/veh) Scenario LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R AM Peak Hour L T R L T I R L T R 2020 D A A A F F F C C C D D D Base (31.6) 9.3 9.3 9.3 66.2 66.2 66.2 22.8 22.8 22.8 28.7 28.7 28.7 A (9.3) F (66.2) C (22.8) D (28.7) L T R L T R L T R L T R E A A A F F F D D L27.9 D D D Future 2022 (40.5) 9.9 9.9 9.9 91.0 91.0 91.0 27.9 27.9 9D 31.6 31.6 31.6 No Build A (9.9) F (91.0) D (27.9) D (31.6) L T R L T R L T R L T R E A A A F F F D D D D D D Future Build (42.4) 9.9 9.9 9.9 96.0 96.0 96.0 29.9 29.9 29.9 32.2 32.2 32.2 A (9.9) F (96.0) D (29.9) D (32.2) L T R L PM Peak T Hour R L T R L T R 2020 B B B B A A A A A A A A A Base (11.1) 14.0 14.0 14.0 7.7 7.7 7.7 9.2 9.2 9.2 7.4 7.4 7.4 B (14.0) A (7.7) A (9.2) A (7.4) L T R L T R L T R L T R B C C C A A A A A A A A A Future (12.2) (15.5) (15.5) (15.5) 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.9 9.9 9.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 No Build C (15.5) A (8.2) A (9.9) A (7.8) L T R L T R L T R L T R 2022 B C C C A A A B B B A A B Future (12.5) 16.0 16.0 16.0 8.2 8.2 8.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 7.9 7.9 11.8 Build C (16.0) A (8.2) B (10.2) A (7.9) Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 6 Serving the Southeast since 2002 4 0 DAVENPORT Queue Length Analysis A summary of the queue length analysis is shown in Table 3 and graphically in Figure 9. Based on the analysis, the northbound queue at the roundabout will extend past the proposed right -out only access. This queue length is expected to be short -lived as majority of the traffic during the morning peak is school traffic. Based on the NCDOT turn lane warrant charts, no turn lanes are warranted. Therefore, it is recommended to design the site access according to NCDOT standards. Figure 10 shows the recommended improvements. Scenario Table 3 - Queue Results AM Peak Hour Queues Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road ROUNDABOUT 2020 Base EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue ft 108.5 637.5 307.2 114.1 Storage Bay ft FULL FULL FULL FULL 2022 Future No Build EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue ft 118.3 881.8 380.1 127.6 Storage Bay (ft) FULL FULL FULL FULL 2022 Future Build EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 119.4 921.4 412.8 129.0 Storage Bay ft FULL PM Peak Hour FULL Queues FULL FULL Scenario 2020 Base Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road ROUNDABOUT EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue (ft) 194.7 45.3 45.2 29.4 Storage Bay (ft) FULL FULL FULL FULL 2022 Future No Build EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue ft 219.0 48.9 52.1 31.8 Storage Bay ft FULL FULL FULL FULL 2022 Future Build EBLTR WBLTR NBLTR SBLTR 95th Percentile Queue ft 254.1 49.2 55.7 32.0 Storage Bay (ft) FULL FULL FULL FULL Home Office: W Wilmington Regional Office: S 0 DAVENPORT Alternative Analysis An alternative trip generation was reviewed for the Demarest Pointe project. A 27 dwelling unit townhome trip generation was analyzed and compared to the original 24 units of townhomes. Table 4 presents the trip generation results. Overall, compared to the original 24 units of townhome, the alternatives level of service has a slight increase delay. Table 5 presents the future build LOS comparison for both alternatives. Home Office: W Demarest Pointe (27 Townhomes) Average Weekday Driveway Volumes 24 Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Two -Way Land Use 11 Land Code Size Method/Type Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Townhomes 220 27 Dwelling Adjacent/ Units Equation 163 3 11 11 7 Total Trips D 29.9 163 3 11 11 7 Home Office: W Table 5 - Middle Sound Loop Road at Darden Road (ROUNDABOUT) Scena7rio •_ • 7,,tboMndMWestbond L T R Northbound Southbound L T R L T R AM Peak Hour R 24 Townhomes E (42.4) A 9.9 A A 9.9 9.9 9 F 96.0 D 29.9 D D D D D 29.9 29.9 32.2 32.2 32.2 A (9.9) F (96.0) D (29.9) D (32.2) L T R L T R L T R L T R 27 Townhomes E (42.8) A 9.9 A 9.9 A 9.9 F 97.1 F 97.1 F 97.1 D 30.3 D 30.3 D 30.3 D 32.3 D 32.3 D 32.3 A (9.9) F (97.1) D (30.3) D (32.3) L T R PM L Peak Hour T R L T R L T R 24 Townhomes B (12.5) C C C 16.0 16.0 16.0 A 8.2 A 8.2 A 8.2 B B B 10.2 10.2 10.2 A A B 7.9 7.9 11.8 C (16.0) A (8.2) B (10.2) A (7.9) L T R L T R L T R L T R 27 Townhomes B (12.5) C 16.0 C 16.0 C 16.0 A 8.3 A 8.3 A 8.3 B 10.3 B 10.3 B 10.3 A 7.9 A 7.9 B 11.8 C (16.0) A (8.3) B (10.3) A (7.9) Home Office: W Wilmington Regional Office: S DAVENPORT Summary and Conclusion DAVENPORT was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this project and to identify transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate the impacts of both background traffic and new development traffic. Based on the trip generation rates and equations published in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition), this development has a trip generation potential of 141 daily trips, 12 trips (3 entering 9 exiting) in the AM peak hour and 17 trips (11 entering 6 exiting) in the PM peak hour. Roundabout Capacity Analysis Overall, the study intersection currently operates at level of service (LOS) D in the AM peak hour and B during the PM peak hour, as shown in Table 2. In the 2022 future no build conditions (without the project site trips) LOS E is expected in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour. In the 2022 future build conditions (which includes the proposed project site trips) the LOS is expected to remain unchanged. Overall, a slight increase (1.9 seconds per vehicle AM and 0.3 seconds per vehicle PM) in delay is expected at the intersection. DAVENPORT is in agreement with NCDOT study, dated February 1, 2018 and conclusions regarding Demarest Pointe development. The roundabout capacity analysis was also performed for a 27 townhome alternative. Considering the minimal additional traffic volumes generated by the 27 townhome alternative compared to the 24 townhome alternative, the AM peak hour delay would increase by 0.4 seconds per vehicle compared to the 24 townhome alternative. There would be no change in delay per vehicle for the PM peak hour. Safety The right -in and right -out driveways paired with the roundabout, provides excellent access management which significantly improves safety when compared to traditional full movement access. Studies have shown that left turns account for 72% of driveway crashes for driveways located near intersections. Left turn movements are typically associated with angle crashes which can often result in injuries. Right turns are more often associated with rear end or sideswipe crashes typically resulting in property damage only. Conclusion In conclusion, this study has reviewed the impacts of both background traffic and proposed development traffic. There is negligible impact from traffic generated by this development and no traffic mitigation measures are recommended. Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.937 Main: 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 7 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 9 0 Attached Supporting Documents: DAVENPORT 1. Figure 1: Site Plan 7. Site Trips 2. Figure 2: Vicinity Map 8. Figure 8: 2022 Future Build Volumes 3. Figure 3: Existing Lane Geometry 9. Figure 9: Roundabout Queue 4. Figure 4: 2020 Base Volumes 10. Figure 10: Recommended Imp. 5. Figure 5: 2022 Future No Build Vol. 11.Appendix 6. Figure 6: Trip Distribution Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main: 910.251.8912; Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 10 Serving the Southeast since 2002 8 (� DAVENPORT Supporting Documents Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458.9377 Main 910.251.8912 Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 11 FIGURE 1 SITE PLAN Board of'ICommissioners - July 13, 2020 4 If FIGURE 1 SITE PLAN Board of'ICommissioners - July 13, 2020 ls k /J >.•i vu a n .r Qg[i *Elf' ent3r DAVENPORT FIGURE 2 VICINITY MAP ommissioners - July 13, 2020 i'. t r INTERSECTIONS STUDIED PROPOSED m Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 14 A SPEED LIMIT ROUNDABOUT 35 S►J N ROADWAY v TRAFFIC MOVEMENT 0 0 K BLACK = EXISTING c m T `m SPEED Middle SoundIn LIMIT Middle Sound 2018 AADT: 35 Loop Road + Loop Road 6,000 0 0 0 �n d a a o a 0 J FIGURE 3 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRY 2018 AADT: 7,300 DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC * ** NOT TO SCALE * ** PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 14 Ji ROUNDABOUT N y ROADWAY TRAFFIC MOVEMENT o BLACK = EXISTING c AM / PM PEAKS R 0 0 �00w M rn w L48/39 r'0 — 413/249 J 1 L r0 /5 Middle Sound Middle Sound Loop Road 156 / 83 J Loop Road 268 / 369 — Lo 143/319'1 ° Co N V N h M N CL 0 0 FIGURE 4 7 O in 2020 BASE TRAFFIC VOLUMES DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE * ** PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 15 Ji ROUNDABOUT N y ROADWAY TRAFFIC MOVEMENT o BLACK = EXISTING c AM / PM PEAKS R 0 v o o L50/41 r " °' 1 —430/260 J 1 Middle Sound L r0 16 W% Middle Sound Loop Road 163 / 87 J Loop Road 279 / 384 — -% v o� c4 149 / 332'N N N M (O N � M V CL 0 J a 7 FIGURE 5 O in 2022 FUTURE NO BUILD VOLUMES DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE * ** PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 17 N ROUNDABOUT RIGHT IN OR RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY y TRAFFIC MOVEMENT BLACK = EXISTING RI_UF = PROPOSEr c IN = ENTERING X m OUT = EXITING a DESTINATION Q NODE Middle Sound Middle Sound rr, Loop Road 100% IN �� 100% IN i Loop Road F- 0 N � ° U O Q � C � y ±' W Demarest L 100% OUT Site Access 2 Pointe (Exit Only) FIGURE 6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION a 0 m r U) of m o. DEMAREST POINTE v 0 NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE " "" PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document �. • by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the client. _ Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 17 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 18 Ji ROUNDABOUT N , RIGHT IN OR RIGHT OUT ONLY R ROADWAY 0 d �► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT 4) `m o BLACK = EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED AM / PM PEAKS 0 0 0 LO /0 0 0 —0 /0 —0 /0 I0 ✓ + ~ 0 / 0 Middle Sound ♦r Middle Sound Loop Road �►♦ 0 / 0 — Loop Road 0 /0-1 h 1 r 3/112 3/11 —+ m 0 0 0/01 " o O ayi 0 Q m = m w 0 o L 9/6 Demarest iSite Access 2 Pointe i (Exit Only) c � o 3 R U) X o d 0. v o o FIGURE 7 SITE TRIPS DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the r • • ' • client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 18 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 19 Ji ROUNDABOUT N , RIGHT IN OR RIGHT OUT ONLY R ROADWAY O d �► TRAFFIC MOVEMENT 4) `m o BLACK = EXISTING BLUE= PROPOSED AM / PM PEAKS w � o m � v cv o 150 / 41 —430/260 —480/307 ~ 1;, r 0 / 6 Middle Sound Middle Sound Loop Road �►/ * 2793 384 Loop Road 163/87 I r - 282 / 395 — 149 / 3321 N = M d O co N co LO Q N LO y c Y W LO y V N L 9 / 6 Demarest iSite Access 2 Pointe 1 (Exit Only) o c � � 3 O N to � d CL O O O U') '= J FIGURE 8 2022 FUTURE BUILD VOLUMES DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the r • • ' • client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 19 Legend JW Future No Build Max Queue Future Build Max Queue i ri TI A . . jur Alt WF 41 -1 7�- A it A _4 Figure 9: Roundabout Queue Dernarest Pointe oard of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 21 JN [ ROUNDABOUT RIGHT IN OR RIGHT OUT ONLY ROADWAY v o TRAFFIC MOVEMENT c BLACK = EXISTING `m BLUE= PROPOSED O -540' ~ Middle Sound *+ Middle Sound Loop Road ►♦ Loop Road N , N Design W C' U 00 site access U Q N 7 according to NCDOT 2 W t standards 1 L Demarest ____________________ Site Access 2 Pointe t (Exit Only) 3 W W M a FIGURE 10 6 0 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS DEMAREST POINTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NUMBER 200221 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of, or improper reliance on, this document by others without written authorization and adaptation by DAVENPORT, shall be without liability to DAVENPORT, and shall be a violation of the agreement between DAVENPORT and the „p . •. client. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 21 DAVENPORT Appendix Home Office: Wilmington Regional Office: Serving the Southeast since 2002 119 Brookstown Ave. Suite PH1 3722 Shipyard Boulevard, Suite E Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Wilmington, NC 28403 Main: 336.744.1636; Fax: 336.458 937 Main 910.251.8912: Fax: 336.458.9377 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 22 0 0 111 \` \■ ■■■■ 282 3 395 11 i'mmum RN00 M■■■ MEMO NONE ■E■■ ■■IM■ ■ ■■N■ Il'■ 111\ ► '� \ \`►� \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ NUMB 1 ■Run munkN \\ \n ■■ ■O ■M■■ ■■ ■E ■ ■M■ ■M ■M ■NMMM■■■ ■EM■ EMMM I ■ivilkl■ 17 \l►-:■\ \! \■■■ NONE ■■ ■E ■ ■N■ SEEM ■■ ■O ■ ■E■ SEEM ■O■■ ll'111 &1 l\Ht ■NI VIR ► ■ ■■ SEEN NONE MEMO MANE NONE ■OE■ NONE ■ ■N■ ll■ m sm N mmmm\\\■ ■■■■ ■■■■ NONE MEMO! ■■ ■E ■ ■E■ ■■■■ ■M■■ m[■IM MMO:N► OMEN \'!■`O SEEM OMEN R■E■ ■E■■ ■■ ■O ■ ■E■ MORE MEMO ■� ■OIL Et ■ ■ \ \r■ 7 \ \O \i \ ■ ■ ■O■ ■ ■E■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■■■■ MINION OuNkmmamm mown Mann ■■■■I MIME ■EM■■ ■E ■■O■ ■SEEN ■■EM ■Sm■MEMEI►\EME M\■ m\` m umm\`\■ NONE ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■E■■ NONE \l■\ ■ \N \M \`\■ MIME KNED MEMO ■E■■ NONE ■ ■E■ NOME MEMO MEM R■■►■ ■NEW MrINa ■mum Mma,.■E■ ■ ■ ■E ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ Won ■IN■\■■.. ■MEEM ■MEN!MMNn.■ lmem ■NEE■ ■EM ■■M ■■E■■ ■E■■ OEM ■MMIN N■► ■ ■:IEN►EE►a \\IMn EMIRE E ■■■ ■■■■ S■■■ ■MIME ■■■■ mom EMNIMN \ ■ \ \ ■ ■ ■ \ ■1► ■ ■ \! ■S NCI ■:1► ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ DAV EINPOR Cumbo, Daniel R <dreumbo @ncdot.gov> To: Scott Stewart Cc: Roan, Jon Mon, Mar 23 at 7:17 AM Scott, Thank you again for coordinating with NCDOT on the review of your proposed development. Please see below NCDOT responses to the items below related to the Demarest Pointe proposed development: 1. Requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA); A TIA will not be required by NCDOT and is below the WMPO and County thresholds for requirement of a TIA. 2. Location and proposed alignment for Demarest Pointe entrance, point of Ingress: NCDOT is in agreement with the entrance access as proposed in your conceptual plan. A turn lane will not be required based on our review of the roadway and site traffic volumes. 3. Location and proposed alignment for Demarest Pointe exit, point of Egress; NCDOT is in agreement with the exit access as proposed in your conceptual plan. 4. Commentary regarding preference specific to Egress onto Middle Sound Loop Road, as shown on the attached Master Development Plan or is there a preference for the possible alternate Egress location utilizing the access /utility /drainage easement provided through 3618 Middle Sound Loop Road onto Pickway Court to Middle Sound Loop Road. NCDOT does not have a preference with regard to exit access alternatives described above. 5. General internal vehicular circulation alignment and vehicular flow pattern of the Demarest Pointe neighborhood design relationship (one way vehicular pattern, right in, right out) to the existing vehicular patterns of Middle Sound Loop Road, the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout and Ogden Elementary School points of Ingress, Egress and vehicular flow patterns. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 24 The Demarest Pointe access design provides excellent access management with limited movement right -in and right -out driveways instead of traditional full movement intersections. The roundabout provides a nearby intersection for vehicular site traffic to make u -turn type movements to accommodate left -in and left -out movements related to the development site. NCDOT does not have any concerns related to the development exit access relative to the school driveways. In general, the development design is well thought out in regard to circulation and flow of traffic. Please let us know if you have any questions or if additional information is needed. Sincerely, -Dan Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Deputy District Engineer Division 3 1 District 3 (910) 398 -9100 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 25 Alternative: Alternative 1 Phase: Project: Demarest Pointe ITE Land Use 220 LOW -RISE 1 24 Dwelling Units Trip Generation Summary Open Date: 5/20/2020 Analysis Date: 5/20/2020 Weekday Average Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour of Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Adjacent Street Traffic * Enter Exit Total * Enter Exit Total * Enter Exit Total 71 70 141 3 9 12 11 6 17 Unadjusted Volume 71 70 141 3 9 12 11 6 17 Internal Capture Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Added to Adjacent Streets 71 70 141 3 9 12 11 6 17 Total Weekday Average Daily Trips Internal Capture = 0 Percent Total Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent Total Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent * - Custom rate used for selected time period. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition TRIP GENERATION 10, TRAFFICWARE, LLC P. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 26 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [AM 2020 Base] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 569 2.0 0.787 22.8 LOS C 12.1 307.2 0.93 1.52 2.03 20.0 8 T1 38 2.0 0.787 22.8 LOS C 12.1 307.2 0.93 1.52 2.03 19.7 18 R2 24 2.0 0.787 22.8 LOS C 12.1 307.2 0.93 1.52 2.03 19.4 Approach 632 2.0 0.787 22.8 LOS C 12.1 307.2 0.93 1.52 2.03 19.9 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 4 2.0 1.013 66.2 LOS F 25.1 637.5 1.00 2.65 4.56 14.8 6 T1 551 2.0 1.013 66.2 LOS F 25.1 637.5 1.00 2.65 4.56 14.7 16 R2 53 2.0 1.013 66.2 LOS F 25.1 637.5 1.00 2.65 4.56 14.5 Approach 608 2.0 1.013 66.2 LOS F 25.1 637.5 1.00 2.65 4.56 14.6 North: Darden Road 7 L2 31 2.0 0.686 28.7 LOS D 4.5 114.1 0.87 1.22 1.72 19.4 4 T1 77 2.0 0.686 28.7 LOS D 4.5 114.1 0.87 1.22 1.72 19.2 14 R2 181 2.0 0.686 28.7 LOS D 4.5 114.1 0.87 1.22 1.72 18.9 Approach 289 2.0 0.686 28.7 LOS D 4.5 114.1 0.87 1.22 1.72 19.0 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 173 2.0 0.550 9.3 LOS A 4.3 108.5 0.45 0.27 0.45 23.3 2 T1 298 2.0 0.550 9.3 LOS A 4.3 108.5 0.45 0.27 0.45 22.9 12 R2 191 2.0 0.550 9.3 LOS A 4.3 108.5 0.45 0.27 0.45 22.4 Approach 662 2.0 0.550 9.3 LOS A 4.3 108.5 0.45 0.27 0.45 22.9 All Vehicles 2191 2.0 1.013 31.6 LOS D 25.1 637.5 0.80 1.42 2.21 18.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Monday, June 01, 2020 11:01:30 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 27 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [AM 2022 FNB] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 593 2.0 0.840 27.9 LOS D 15.0 380.1 0.98 1.74 2.41 19.1 8 T1 40 2.0 0.840 27.9 LOS D 15.0 380.1 0.98 1.74 2.41 18.9 18 R2 26 2.0 0.840 27.9 LOS D 15.0 380.1 0.98 1.74 2.41 18.6 Approach 659 2.0 0.840 27.9 LOS D 15.0 380.1 0.98 1.74 2.41 19.1 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 4 2.0 1.092 91.0 LOS F 34.7 881.8 1.00 3.29 6.01 12.7 6 T1 573 2.0 1.092 91.0 LOS F 34.7 881.8 1.00 3.29 6.01 12.6 16 R2 56 2.0 1.092 91.0 LOS F 34.7 881.8 1.00 3.29 6.01 12.5 Approach 633 2.0 1.092 91.0 LOS F 34.7 881.8 1.00 3.29 6.01 12.6 North: Darden Road 7 L2 33 2.0 0.724 31.6 LOS D 5.0 127.6 0.88 1.28 1.85 19.0 4 T1 80 2.0 0.724 31.6 LOS D 5.0 127.6 0.88 1.28 1.85 18.7 14 R2 189 2.0 0.724 31.6 LOS D 5.0 127.6 0.88 1.28 1.85 18.4 Approach 303 2.0 0.724 31.6 LOS D 5.0 127.6 0.88 1.28 1.85 18.5 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 181 2.0 0.576 9.9 LOS A 4.7 118.3 0.48 0.29 0.48 23.1 2 T1 310 2.0 0.576 9.9 LOS A 4.7 118.3 0.48 0.29 0.48 22.8 12 R2 199 2.0 0.576 9.9 LOS A 4.7 118.3 0.48 0.29 0.48 22.3 Approach 690 2.0 0.576 9.9 LOS A 4.7 118.3 0.48 0.29 0.48 22.8 All Vehicles 2285 2.0 1.092 40.5 LOS E 34.7 881.8 0.82 1.67 2.75 17.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Monday, June 01, 2020 11:01:31 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 28 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [AM 2022 FB] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 605 2.0 0.859 29.9 LOS D 16.3 412.8 1.00 1.83 2.56 18.8 8 T1 40 2.0 0.859 29.9 LOS D 16.3 412.8 1.00 1.83 2.56 18.6 18 R2 26 2.0 0.859 29.9 LOS D 16.3 412.8 1.00 1.83 2.56 18.3 Approach 671 2.0 0.859 29.9 LOS D 16.3 412.8 1.00 1.83 2.56 18.8 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 4 2.0 1.106 96.0 LOS F 36.3 921.4 1.00 3.40 6.27 12.4 6 T1 573 2.0 1.106 96.0 LOS F 36.3 921.4 1.00 3.40 6.27 12.3 16 R2 56 2.0 1.106 96.0 LOS F 36.3 921.4 1.00 3.40 6.27 12.2 Approach 633 2.0 1.106 96.0 LOS F 36.3 921.4 1.00 3.40 6.27 12.3 North: Darden Road 7 L2 33 2.0 0.728 32.2 LOS D 5.1 129.0 0.88 1.29 1.87 18.9 4 T1 80 2.0 0.728 32.2 LOS D 5.1 129.0 0.88 1.29 1.87 18.6 14 R2 189 2.0 0.728 32.2 LOS D 5.1 129.0 0.88 1.29 1.87 18.3 Approach 303 2.0 0.728 32.2 LOS D 5.1 129.0 0.88 1.29 1.87 18.5 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 181 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 23.1 2 T1 313 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.8 12 R2 199 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.3 Approach 693 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.7 All Vehicles 2300 2.0 1.106 42.4 LOS E 36.3 921.4 0.83 1.73 2.87 17.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Monday, June 01, 2020 11:01:34 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 29 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [PM 2020 Base] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 228 2.0 0.363 9.2 LOS A 1.8 45.2 0.66 0.68 0.70 22.7 8 T1 42 2.0 0.363 9.2 LOS A 1.8 45.2 0.66 0.68 0.70 22.4 18 R2 6 2.0 0.363 9.2 LOS A 1.8 45.2 0.66 0.68 0.70 22.0 Approach 276 2.0 0.363 9.2 LOS A 1.8 45.2 0.66 0.68 0.70 22.7 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 6 2.0 0.351 7.7 LOS A 1.8 45.3 0.57 0.50 0.57 24.0 6 T1 277 2.0 0.351 7.7 LOS A 1.8 45.3 0.57 0.50 0.57 23.6 16 R2 43 2.0 0.351 7.7 LOS A 1.8 45.3 0.57 0.50 0.57 23.1 Approach 326 2.0 0.351 7.7 LOS A 1.8 45.3 0.57 0.50 0.57 23.6 North: Darden Road 7 L2 53 2.0 0.260 7.4 LOS A 1.2 29.4 0.60 0.57 0.60 23.7 4 T1 64 2.0 0.260 7.4 LOS A 1.2 29.4 0.60 0.57 0.60 23.4 14 R2 89 2.0 0.260 7.4 LOS A 1.2 29.4 0.60 0.57 0.60 22.9 Approach 207 2.0 0.260 7.4 LOS A 1.2 29.4 0.60 0.57 0.60 23.2 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 92 2.0 0.720 14.0 LOS B 7.7 194.7 0.66 0.41 0.66 22.4 2 T1 410 2.0 0.720 14.0 LOS B 7.7 194.7 0.66 0.41 0.66 22.0 12 R2 354 2.0 0.720 14.0 LOS B 7.7 194.7 0.66 0.41 0.66 21.6 Approach 857 2.0 0.720 14.0 LOS B 7.7 194.7 0.66 0.41 0.66 21.9 All Vehicles 1664 2.0 0.720 11.1 LOS B 7.7 194.7 0.63 0.49 0.64 22.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 11:19:31 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 30 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [PM 2022 FNB] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 238 2.0 0.390 9.9 LOS A 2.1 52.1 0.68 0.73 0.78 22.6 8 T1 44 2.0 0.390 9.9 LOS A 2.1 52.1 0.68 0.73 0.78 22.3 18 R2 7 2.0 0.390 9.9 LOS A 2.1 52.1 0.68 0.73 0.78 21.8 Approach 289 2.0 0.390 9.9 LOS A 2.1 52.1 0.68 0.73 0.78 22.5 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 7 2.0 0.374 8.2 LOS A 1.9 48.9 0.59 0.53 0.59 23.9 6 T1 289 2.0 0.374 8.2 LOS A 1.9 48.9 0.59 0.53 0.59 23.5 16 R2 46 2.0 0.374 8.2 LOS A 1.9 48.9 0.59 0.53 0.59 23.0 Approach 341 2.0 0.374 8.2 LOS A 1.9 48.9 0.59 0.53 0.59 23.5 North: Darden Road 7 L2 56 2.0 0.279 7.8 LOS A 1.3 31.8 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.6 4 T1 68 2.0 0.279 7.8 LOS A 1.3 31.8 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.3 14 R2 93 2.0 0.279 7.8 LOS A 1.3 31.8 0.61 0.60 0.61 22.8 Approach 217 2.0 0.279 7.8 LOS A 1.3 31.8 0.61 0.60 0.61 23.1 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 97 2.0 0.755 15.5 LOS C 8.6 219.0 0.73 0.47 0.73 22.0 2 T1 427 2.0 0.755 15.5 LOS C 8.6 219.0 0.73 0.47 0.73 21.7 12 R2 369 2.0 0.755 15.5 LOS C 8.6 219.0 0.73 0.47 0.73 21.3 Approach 892 2.0 0.755 15.5 LOS C 8.6 219.0 0.73 0.47 0.73 21.5 All Vehicles 1739 2.0 0.755 12.2 LOS B 8.6 219.0 0.68 0.54 0.70 22.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 11:19:31 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 31 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [PM 2022 FB] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 244 2.0 0.404 10.2 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.5 8 T1 44 2.0 0.404 10.2 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.2 18 R2 7 2.0 0.404 10.2 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.69 0.76 0.83 21.7 Approach 296 2.0 0.404 10.2 LOS B 2.2 55.7 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.4 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 7 2.0 0.377 8.2 LOS A 1.9 49.2 0.60 0.53 0.60 23.9 6 T1 289 2.0 0.377 8.2 LOS A 1.9 49.2 0.60 0.53 0.60 23.5 16 R2 46 2.0 0.377 8.2 LOS A 1.9 49.2 0.60 0.53 0.60 23.0 Approach 341 2.0 0.377 8.2 LOS A 1.9 49.2 0.60 0.53 0.60 23.4 North: Darden Road 7 L2 56 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.6 4 T1 68 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.2 14 R2 93 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 22.7 Approach 217 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.1 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 97 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.9 2 T1 439 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.6 12 R2 369 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.2 Approach 904 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.4 All Vehicles 1758 2.0 0.765 12.5 LOS B 10.0 254.1 0.69 0.57 0.73 22.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 11:19:32 AM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \CAPACITY ANALYSIS \SIDRA \Roundabout (node 100).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 32 DAVENPORT Count Number: 17 -02640 Division: 3 County: New Hanover City: Wilmington Day 1 Count Date: 12/12/2017 Count Time: 6:00am- 7:00pm Weather Conditions: 65- Hi /34- Lo /Prec: 0" Milepost: N/A 1. Counted By: M. Martin 2. Data Processor: C. Bowers 3. Method Used: JAMAR Traffic Data Collector with video 4. Equipment Operating as Specified by the Manufacturer: Yes 5. School in Session: Yes 6. Break Times: None 7. Area Lighting Present: None present 8. Traffic Control: Roundabout - Single Lane 9. Signal Cabinet Number: N/A 10. Disabled Pedestrians: None observed 11. Construction Present: No 12. Traffic Flow Disruption: None observed 13. Railroad Crossings: None within 200 ft of each leg 14. Other Signal or Stop Controlled Intersections: None within 300 ft of each leg Home Office: 305 West Fourth Street, Suite 2A Winston - Salem, NC 27101 Main: 336.744.1636 Fax: 336.458.9377 Intersection: SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) 13 -Hour Traffic Volume: 13,421 Vehicles Vicinity Map a 7 ZockerbYGn O �'Q' p�ldAle Spwz$ Loo Ra Lcop fed Count Site Ogden Elementary sch001 Intersection Sketch Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 33 Counted By: M. Martin DAVENPORT 119 Brookstown Ave., Suite PHI, Winston Salem NC, 27101 Ph:(336)744 -1636 Groups Printed- All Vehicles File Name :17-02640 Site Code : 1702640 Start Date : 12/12/2017 Page No : 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 34 Darden Road Middle Sound Loop Road Middle Sound Loop Road Middle Sound Loop Road Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Tlme Right LT —hr u Left Pads _nPP_rmai Rght Thru_ Left Peds _n�P Tsai_ Right Thru Left Peds nQTai Ri ht Thru Left Peds Ap,T 1 e. i ror i In w ro ai ht. rotas 06:00 AM 3 1 0 0 4 0 16 0 0 16 0 1 17 0 18 6 11 4 0 21 0 59 59 06:15 AM 2 1 0 0 3 0 24 0 0 24 1 2 27 0 30 8 21 7 0 36 0 93 93 06:30 AM 4 3 0 0 7 2 39 1 0 42 0 4 37 0 41 18 23 6 0 47 0 137 137 06:45 AM 10 4 1 0 15 3 52 0 1 55 0 3 46 0 49 21 19 13 0 53 1 172 173 Total 19 9 1 0 29 5 131 1 1 137 1 10 127 0 138 53 74 30 0 157 1 461 462 07:00 AM 7 3 4 0 14 5 70 1 0 76 0 5 68 0 73 17 18 11 0 46 0 209 209 07:15 AM 26 7 0 0 33 6 95 0 1 101 1 6 65 0 72 24 27 16 0 67 1 273 274 07:30 AM 32 5 1 0 38 8 88 2 0 98 4 5 86 0 95 15 39 20 0 74 0 305 305 07:45 AM 20 10 4 0 34 7 73 0 0 80 3 5 82 0 90 21 44 23 0 88 0 292 292 Total 85 25 9 0 119 26 326 3 1 355 8 21 301 0 330 77 128 70 0 275 1 1079 1080 08:00 AM 27 14 5 0 46 10 99 0 0 109 4 7 96 0 107 29 60 32 0 121 0 383 383 08:15 AM 38 19 8 0 65 13 111 0 0 124 6 9 107 0 122 39 73 43 0 155 0 466 466 08:30 AM 39 20 8 0 67 14 93 0 0 107 6 10 102 0 118 41 67 45 0 153 0 445 445 08:45 AM 2_4_12 5 0 41 8 86 0 0 94 4 6 97 0 107 25 52 27 0 104 0 346 346 Total 128 65 26 0 219 45 389 0 0 434 20 32 402 0 454 134 252 147 0 533 0 1640 1640 09:00 AM 13 5 2 0 20 2 51 2 0 55 2 7 60 0 69 25 35 6 0 66 0 210 210 09:15 AM 17 8 4 0 29 2 69 0 0 71 0 5 58 0 63 38 27 5 0 70 0 233 233 09:30 AM 10 9 2 0 21 3 42 0 0 45 1 6 43 0 50 34 31 12 0 77 0 193 193 09:45 AM_ 8 3 3 0 14 8 44 1 0 53 1 6 51 0 58 32 33 12 0 77 0 202 202__ Total 48 25 11 0 84 15 206 3 0 224 4 24 212 0 240 129 126 35 0 290 0 838 838 10:00 AM 10 10 3 0 23 7 47 1 0 55 1 9 50 1 60 41 28 17 0 86 1 224 225 10:15 AM 11 7 2 0 20 6 38 1 0 45 1 8 39 1 48 23 38 14 0 75 1 188 189 10:30 AM 14 10 5 0 29 4 50 0 1 54 2 5 52 0 59 36 28 15 0 79 1 221 222 10:45 AM 15 7 5 0 27 5 49 1 0 55 0 9 50 0 59 41 30 17 0 88 0 229 229 Total 50 34 15 0 99 22 184 3 1 209 4 31 191 2 226 141 124 63 0 328 3 862 865 11:00 AM 13 15 4 0 32 4 50 1 0 55 3 10 51 1 64 31 22 14 0 67 1 218 219 11:15 AM 12 5 3 0 20 5 43 1 0 49 0 11 45 0 56 37 46 13 0 96 0 221 221 11:30 AM 7 7 1 0 15 4 45 1 0 50 1 7 36 0 44 44 34 9 0 87 0 196 196 11:45 AM 6 15 7 0 28 5 52 1 0 58 1 6 63 0 70 42 35 8 0 85 0 241 241 Total 38 42 15 0 95 18 190 4 0 212 5 34 195 1 234 154 137 44 0 335 1 876 877 12:00 PM 21 17 1 0 39 9 44 2 0 55 2 4 57 0 63 47 36 11 0 94 0 251 251 12:15 PM 11 7 6 0 24 4 58 2 0 64 1 6 46 0 53 34 41 15 0 90 0 231 231 12:30 PM 10 11 6 0 27 5 46 0 0 51 0 6 42 0 48 52 34 17 0 103 0 229 229 12:45 PM 17 6 5 0 28 10 35 0 0 45 1 4 44 1 49 45 35 21 0 101 1 223 224 Total 59 41 18 0 118 28 183 4 0 215 4 20 189 1 213 178 146 64 0 388 1 934 935 01:00 PM 24 13 4 1 41 19 30 0 1 49 1 8 47 1 56 39 47 18 1 104 4 250 254 01:15 PM 12 1 3 0 16 4 41 1 1 46 0 5 54 0 59 38 52 20 0 110 1 231 232 01:30 PM 13 4 3 0 20 8 44 1 0 53 1 12 54 0 67 52 52 11 0 115 0 255 255 01:45 PM 21 8 8 0 37 6 47 1 0 54 4 8 34 0 46 60 46 15 0 121 0 258 258 Total 70 26 18 1 114 37 162 3 2 202 6 33 189 1 228 189 197 64 1 450 5 994 999 02:00 PM 13 9 8 0 30 5 56 0 1 61 1 15 60 0 76 51 37 14 0 102 1 269 270 02:15 PM 15 7 3 0 25 12 49 1 0 62 4 13 68 0 85 49 39 14 0 102 0 274 274 02:30 PM 14 8 10 0 32 7 46 0 0 53 1 11 33 0 45 40 51 17 0 108 0 238 238 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 34 DAVENPORT 119 Brookstown Ave., Suite PHI, Winston Salem NC, 27101 Ph:(336)744 -1636 (:rniinc Printarl- All Vahirlac File Name :17-02640 Site Code : 1702640 Start Date : 12/12/2017 Page No :2 03:00 PM 13 6 2 0 21 6 46 1 0 53 2 9 55 0 66 37 67 21 0 125 0 265 265 03:15 PM 15 7 16 0 38 5 35 0 0 40 4 13 60 0 77 39 55 11 0 105 0 260 260 03:30 PM 14 10 9 0 33 8 59 1 0 68 1 10 54 0 65 57 58 15 0 130 0 296 296 03:45 PM 13 10 5 0 28 5 38 2 0 45 3 6 38 0 47 46 66 16 0 128 0 248 248 Total 55 33 32 0 120 24 178 4 0 206 10 38 207 0 255 179 246 63 0 488 0 1069 1069 04:00 PM 11 10 4 0 25 4 41 0 0 45 1 11 49 0 61 44 61 14 0 119 0 250 250 04:15 PM 15 16 2 0 33 12 47 1 0 60 3 10 47 0 60 47 65 18 0 130 0 283 283 04:30 PM 13 10 15 0 38 7 46 1 0 54 4 11 58 0 73 55 79 21 0 155 0 320 320 04:45 PM 11 18 4 0 33 6 52 0 0 58 4 13 54 0 71 59 81 25 0 165 0 327 327 Total 50 54 25 0 129 29 186 2 0 217 12 45 208 0 265 205 286 78 0 569 0 1180 1180 05:00 PM 23 13 13 0 49 14 61 1 0 76 0 7 65 0 72 79 76 13 0 168 0 365 365 05:15 PM 17 12 9 0 38 9 52 0 0 61 1 9 39 0 49 98 103 20 0 221 0 369 369 05:30 PM 19 19 9 0 47 5 58 2 0 65 2 8 35 0 45 70 91 17 0 178 0 335 335 05:45 PM 16 10 14 0 40 8 63 1 0 72 1 11 54 0 66 53 77 28 0 158 0 336 336 Total 75 54 45 0 174 36 234 4 0 274 4 35 193 0 232 300 347 78 0 725 0 1405 1405 06:00 PM 14 11 0 0 25 11 50 0 0 61 3 9 65 0 77 44 66 21 0 131 0 294 294 06:15 PM 16 8 8 0 32 6 43 2 0 51 0 7 49 0 56 45 61 9 0 115 0 254 254 06:30 PM 16 10 6 0 32 3 28 1 0 32 1 13 61 0 75 49 56 11 0 116 0 255 255 06:45 PM 12 8 4 0 24 5 23 0 0 28 0 6 43 0 49 55 49 13 0 117 0 218 218 Total 58 37 18 0 113 25 144 3 0 172 4 35 218 0 257 193 232 54 0 479 0 1021 1021 Grand Total 791 488 261 1 1540 339 2724 35 6 3098 88 409 2854 5 3351 2111 2475 846 1 5432 13 13421 13434 Apprch % 51.4 31.7 16.9 10.9 87.9 1.1 2.6 12.2 85.2 38.9 45.6 15.6 Total % 5.9 3.6 1.9 11.5 2.5 20.3 0.3 23.1 0.7 3 21.3 25 15.7 18.4 6.3 40.5 0.1 99.9 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 35 Darden Road Southbound Middle Sound Loop Road Westbound Middle Sound Loop Road Northbound Middle Sound Loop Road Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds APP T-i Right Thru I Left Peds App T-i Right Thru Left Peds nvv m11i Right Thru Left Peds App TMI E. ro mmu To ai int total 02:45 PM 14 19 7 0 40 5 60 0 0 65 0 12 61 0 73 39 53 11 0 103 0 281 281 Total 56 43 28 0 127 29 211 1 1 241 6 51 222 0 279 179 180 56 0 415 1 1062 1063 03:00 PM 13 6 2 0 21 6 46 1 0 53 2 9 55 0 66 37 67 21 0 125 0 265 265 03:15 PM 15 7 16 0 38 5 35 0 0 40 4 13 60 0 77 39 55 11 0 105 0 260 260 03:30 PM 14 10 9 0 33 8 59 1 0 68 1 10 54 0 65 57 58 15 0 130 0 296 296 03:45 PM 13 10 5 0 28 5 38 2 0 45 3 6 38 0 47 46 66 16 0 128 0 248 248 Total 55 33 32 0 120 24 178 4 0 206 10 38 207 0 255 179 246 63 0 488 0 1069 1069 04:00 PM 11 10 4 0 25 4 41 0 0 45 1 11 49 0 61 44 61 14 0 119 0 250 250 04:15 PM 15 16 2 0 33 12 47 1 0 60 3 10 47 0 60 47 65 18 0 130 0 283 283 04:30 PM 13 10 15 0 38 7 46 1 0 54 4 11 58 0 73 55 79 21 0 155 0 320 320 04:45 PM 11 18 4 0 33 6 52 0 0 58 4 13 54 0 71 59 81 25 0 165 0 327 327 Total 50 54 25 0 129 29 186 2 0 217 12 45 208 0 265 205 286 78 0 569 0 1180 1180 05:00 PM 23 13 13 0 49 14 61 1 0 76 0 7 65 0 72 79 76 13 0 168 0 365 365 05:15 PM 17 12 9 0 38 9 52 0 0 61 1 9 39 0 49 98 103 20 0 221 0 369 369 05:30 PM 19 19 9 0 47 5 58 2 0 65 2 8 35 0 45 70 91 17 0 178 0 335 335 05:45 PM 16 10 14 0 40 8 63 1 0 72 1 11 54 0 66 53 77 28 0 158 0 336 336 Total 75 54 45 0 174 36 234 4 0 274 4 35 193 0 232 300 347 78 0 725 0 1405 1405 06:00 PM 14 11 0 0 25 11 50 0 0 61 3 9 65 0 77 44 66 21 0 131 0 294 294 06:15 PM 16 8 8 0 32 6 43 2 0 51 0 7 49 0 56 45 61 9 0 115 0 254 254 06:30 PM 16 10 6 0 32 3 28 1 0 32 1 13 61 0 75 49 56 11 0 116 0 255 255 06:45 PM 12 8 4 0 24 5 23 0 0 28 0 6 43 0 49 55 49 13 0 117 0 218 218 Total 58 37 18 0 113 25 144 3 0 172 4 35 218 0 257 193 232 54 0 479 0 1021 1021 Grand Total 791 488 261 1 1540 339 2724 35 6 3098 88 409 2854 5 3351 2111 2475 846 1 5432 13 13421 13434 Apprch % 51.4 31.7 16.9 10.9 87.9 1.1 2.6 12.2 85.2 38.9 45.6 15.6 Total % 5.9 3.6 1.9 11.5 2.5 20.3 0.3 23.1 0.7 3 21.3 25 15.7 18.4 6.3 40.5 0.1 99.9 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 35 DAVENPORT 119 Brookstown Ave., Suite PHI, Winston Salem NC, 27101 Ph:(336)744 -1636 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Darden Road Out In Total 1594 1540 1 3134 791 488 261 Ri ht Thru Left 0 1 vx4 co N -o CL °D a• North • w a m �W p N 0 a a 0 c v Lv� ► 12/12/2017 06:00 AM N ~ 12/12/2017 06:45 PM P a 0 0 r- 0 N �°' All Vehicles . m 0 0 N N N N — d Left Thru Ri ht 2854 409 88 2634 3351 5985 ut In Tota O l Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 36 17 -02640 1702640 12/12/2017 3 DAVENPORT 119 Brookstown Ave., Suite PHI, Winston Salem NC, 27101 Ph:(336)744 -1636 File Name :17-02640 Site Code : 1702640 Start Date : 12/12/2017 Page No : 4 Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 10:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Paak Hnur fnr Fntira Intarcactinn Raninc at nR-nn AM Int. Total 08:00 AM Darden Road Southbound Middle Sound Loop Road Westbound Middle Sound Loop Road Northbound Middle Sound Loop Road Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left I App. Total Right I Thru Left App. Total Right Thru I Left I App. Total Right I Thru I Left App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 10:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Paak Hnur fnr Fntira Intarcactinn Raninc at nR-nn AM Int. Total 08:00 AM 27 14 5 46 10 99 0 109 4 7 96 107 29 60 32 121 383 08:15 AM 38 19 8 65 13 111 0 124 6 9 107 122 39 73 43 155 466 08:30 AM 39 20 8 67 14 93 0 107 6 10 102 118 41 67 45 153 445 08:45 AM 24 12 5 41 8 86 0 94 4 6 97 107 25 52 27 104 346 Total Volume 128 65 26 219 45 389 0 434 20 32 402 454 134 252 147 533 1640 % App. Total 58.4 29.7 11.9 10.4 89.6 0 4.4 7 88.5 25.1 47.3 27.6 PHF .821 .813 .813 .817 .804 .876 .000 .875 .833 .800 .939 .930 .817 .863 .817 .860 .880 Darden Road Out In Total 224 219 1 443 128 65 26 Ri ht Thru Left Peak Hour Data aa �a mmo~ - 0D C North �m o p M o LL 2 N Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 A �6 n c m r Oo ° All Vehicles °l gy a C on � g �v a Left Thru Right 402 32 20 199 454 F 653 Out In Total Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 37 DAVENPORT 119 Brookstown Ave., Suite PHI, Winston Salem NC, 27101 Ph:(336)744 -1636 File Name : 17 -02640 Site Code : 1702640 Start Date : 12/12/2017 Page No :5 Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Int. Total 05:00 PM Darden Road Southbound Middle Sound Loop Road Westbound Middle Sound Loop Road Northbound Middle Sound Loop Road Eastbound Start Time I Right I Thru Left I App. Total Right I Thru I Left App. Total Right Thru I Left I App. Total Right I Thru I Left App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Int. Total 05:00 PM 23 13 13 49 14 61 1 76 0 7 65 72 79 76 13 168 365 05:15 PM 17 12 9 38 9 52 0 61 1 9 39 49 98 103 20 221 369 05:30 PM 19 19 9 47 5 58 2 65 2 8 35 45 70 91 17 178 335 05:45 PM 16 10 14 40 8 63 1 72 1 11 54 66 53 77 28 158 336 Total Volume 75 54 45 174 36 234 4 274 4 35 193 232 300 347 78 725 1405 % App. Total 43.1 31 25.9 13.1 85.4 1.5 1.7 15.1 83.2 41.4 47.9 10.8 PHF .815 .711 .804 .888 .643 .929 .500 .901 .500 .795 .742 .806 .765 .842 .696 .820 .952 Darden Road Out In Total 149 174 1 323 75 54 45 Ri ht Thru Left Peak Hour Data 0 ? Woa of ^ %- ��a 0 J • North • D' W °' N S o c c M tv► ([F�Pe:ak o ~ r Hou r 2 0 O ° ° cl) cu a o v0 ° + Via rn0 CD 0 � viii a o— Left Thru Ri ht 193 35 4 358 232 590 Out In Total Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 38 DAVENPORT Project #17 -02640 NCDOT Count #17 -02640 SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road), New Hanover County, NC SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Northbound Facing North DAVENPORT Project #17 -02640 NCDOT Count #17 -02640 SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road), New Hanover County, NC SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Southbound Facing South SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Boa�doutW iss er J 13 2020 q°jac g orth DAVENPORT Project #17 -02640 NCDOT Count #17 -02640 SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road), New Hanover County, NC 4411 ogm SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Westbound Facing West SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) BoardWeAbmnisi&f xsii*l1ja §t 2020 DAVENPORT Project #17 -02640 NCDOT Count #17 -02640 SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road), New Hanover County, NC SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Eastbound Facing East SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) and SR 1407 (Darden Road) Boarcfids bans i &m��Wd§t 2020 ITEM• 7 - 11 - 49 Alternative: Alternative 1 Phase: Project: Demarest Pointe ITE Land Use 220 LOW -RISE 1 27 Dwelling Units Trip Generation Summary Open Date: 5/27/2020 Analysis Date: 5/27/2020 Weekday Average Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour of Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Adjacent Street Traffic * Enter Exit Total * Enter Exit Total * Enter Exit Total 82 81 163 3 11 14 11 7 18 Unadjusted Volume 82 81 163 3 11 14 11 7 18 Internal Capture Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Added to Adjacent Streets 82 81 163 3 11 14 11 7 18 Total Weekday Average Daily Trips Internal Capture = 0 Percent Total Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent Total Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 Percent * - Custom rate used for selected time period. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition TRIP GENERATION 10, TRAFFICWARE, LLC P. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 43 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [AM 2022 FB 27 Townhomes] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 608 2.0 0.862 30.3 LOS D 16.5 419.6 1.00 1.84 2.59 18.8 8 T1 40 2.0 0.862 30.3 LOS D 16.5 419.6 1.00 1.84 2.59 18.5 18 R2 26 2.0 0.862 30.3 LOS D 16.5 419.6 1.00 1.84 2.59 18.2 Approach 674 2.0 0.862 30.3 LOS D 16.5 419.6 1.00 1.84 2.59 18.7 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 4 2.0 1.109 97.1 LOS F 36.6 930.3 1.00 3.43 6.33 12.3 6 T1 573 2.0 1.109 97.1 LOS F 36.6 930.3 1.00 3.43 6.33 12.2 16 R2 56 2.0 1.109 97.1 LOS F 36.6 930.3 1.00 3.43 6.33 12.1 Approach 633 2.0 1.109 97.1 LOS F 36.6 930.3 1.00 3.43 6.33 12.2 North: Darden Road 7 L2 33 2.0 0.729 32.3 LOS D 5.1 129.3 0.89 1.30 1.88 18.9 4 T1 80 2.0 0.729 32.3 LOS D 5.1 129.3 0.89 1.30 1.88 18.6 14 R2 189 2.0 0.729 32.3 LOS D 5.1 129.3 0.89 1.30 1.88 18.3 Approach 303 2.0 0.729 32.3 LOS D 5.1 129.3 0.89 1.30 1.88 18.4 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 181 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 23.1 2 T1 313 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.8 12 R2 199 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.3 Approach 693 2.0 0.579 9.9 LOS A 4.7 119.4 0.49 0.29 0.49 22.7 All Vehicles 2303 2.0 1.109 42.8 LOS E 36.6 930.3 0.83 1.74 2.89 17.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Monday, June 01, 2020 1:29:11 PM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \TIA DOCUMENTS \27 Town homes \Roundabout (27TH).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 44 MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 100 [PM 2022 FB 27 Townhomes] Roundabout - Middle Sound Loop Road @ Darden Road Site Category: (None) Roundabout South: Middle Sound Loop Road 3 L2 246 2.0 0.406 10.3 LOS B 2.2 56.1 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.5 8 T1 44 2.0 0.406 10.3 LOS B 2.2 56.1 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.2 18 R2 7 2.0 0.406 10.3 LOS B 2.2 56.1 0.69 0.76 0.83 21.7 Approach 297 2.0 0.406 10.3 LOS B 2.2 56.1 0.69 0.76 0.83 22.4 East: Middle Sound Loop Road 1 L2 7 2.0 0.377 8.3 LOS A 1.9 49.3 0.60 0.54 0.60 23.9 6 T1 289 2.0 0.377 8.3 LOS A 1.9 49.3 0.60 0.54 0.60 23.5 16 R2 46 2.0 0.377 8.3 LOS A 1.9 49.3 0.60 0.54 0.60 23.0 Approach 341 2.0 0.377 8.3 LOS A 1.9 49.3 0.60 0.54 0.60 23.4 North: Darden Road 7 L2 56 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.6 4 T1 68 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.2 14 R2 93 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 22.7 Approach 217 2.0 0.281 7.9 LOS A 1.3 32.0 0.62 0.60 0.62 23.1 West: Middle Sound Loop Road 5 L2 97 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.9 2 T1 439 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.6 12 R2 369 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.2 Approach 904 2.0 0.765 16.0 LOS C 10.0 254.1 0.74 0.51 0.78 21.4 All Vehicles 1759 2.0 0.765 12.5 LOS B 10.0 254.1 0.69 0.57 0.73 22.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v /c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap- Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV ( %) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 1 Copyright © 2000 -2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd I sidrasolutions.com Organisation: JOHN DAVENPORT ENGINEERING INC I Processed: Monday, June 01, 2020 1:40:27 PM Project: Z:\ 2020\ 200221 _MiddlesoundLLC_DemarestPointe \TRAFFIC ENGINEERING \TIA DOCUMENTS \27 Town homes \Roundabout (27TH).sip8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 45 Technical Summary Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration FHWA -SA -10 -002 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 46 Safe Roads for a Safer Future, investment In readmig safety saves lives << y Access Management is: • The design, implementation and management of entry and exit points between roadways and adjacent properties. • This presentation overviews the safety considerations of access management near intersections. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 47 N V, U Q 4� i� E Consideration 4: Eliminating Left -Turn Movements Improves Safety 72% of crashes at a driveway involve a left- turning vehicle 6 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 48 Consideration 6: Reducing Driveway Density Reduces Crash Rates • Research shows as driveway density increases, crash rates also increase W British Columbia 2-Lane Urban 10 Michigan 2-Lane Urban 4D Michigan 2-Lane Rural 0 British Columbia 4-Lane Urban C> 0 Florida Florida* 4) Florida* ....... 0 Oregon Urban* ics 0 r I C) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 Oregon Rural* Road type not specified Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 49 Consideration 7: Driveway Design Influences Safety and Mobility Elements to Consider • Upstream and downstream sight distance • Angle at which driveway intersects the major road • Driveway width and curb radii • Number of lanes should be sufficient for the volume at the site • Vertical grade should be level to allow motorists to easily stop with adequate sight distance prior to entering major roadway Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 50 Other Treatments to Improve Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety Near Suburban Intersections 0 Provide raised medians to prohibit left turns — Reduces number of potential pedestrian - vehicle conflicts Minimize the driveway width as much as possible — Reduces pedestrian crossing distance and exposure Do not block pedestrian - driver sight lines — Make pedestrians and drivers visible to each other Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 51 0 E W q 0 24 Other Treatments to Improve Motorist Safety Near Urban Intersections (Continued) • Place driveways on one -way streets — Creates fewer conflict points • Place left -in driveways near center of block — Minimizes interaction with intersection queues • Position driveways as far upstream from intersections as possible — Provides exiting motorists distance to make lane changes 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 52 Treatments to Improve Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety Near Suburban Intersections Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 53 vi fCS 0 La V) 21 Access Management Near Suburban Intersections • Suburban areas offer the greatest opportunity to manage access and positively impact safety Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 11 - 54 1^..) E Q% s� cu c �a m �.W CL LS.. 0 �n E (. aL CL CL -Ci v A N .4+ C N m .G iQ f� O CL ip MIDDLES©UND LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, NC 28411 March 30, 2020 TO: Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents FROM: Middlesound LLC RE: Notice for Information Regarding a Conditional Use Rezoning Request Dear Neighbors, This is a Notice for information for all my Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners in the proximity of Middlesound LLC properties. The information contained in the notice is to inform you of a request by Middlesound LLC to New Hanover County to rezone the property located at 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road. In addition, the election to request a Conditional Use Rezoning will be applied for that provides the opportunity to establish specific standards and conditions pertaining to this application during the New Hanover County Planning Board and Commissioners procedures. This Notice for Information was directed by the New Hanover County Planning Department Planning in lieu of conducting a Community Meeting due to the current limitations for assembly of gatherings from the Coronavirus restrictions. As required by the County, this Notice of Information is sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the property boundary and available to all other interested parties. Middlesound LLC is requesting a Conditional Use Rezoning Request to allow the currently zoned R -20 designation to Conditional Use R -5 Residential District designation in accordance with New Hanover County's Unified Development Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan for 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road (3.35 acres). The properties are at an average elevation of +27, with no wetlands present, are not in a flood zone and are serviced by all required utilities. Since assembling these properties in 2004, in preparation for the future development 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road, Middlesound LLC in 2009 assigned easement entitlements for access, utilities and stormwater drainage on adjacent properties to the south along Pickway Court, all owned by Middlesound LLC. The easement entitlements (approximately .7 acres) are adjacent to and support the access, utilities and stormwater drainage regarding the proposed 3.35 acres rezoning request for Conditional Use R -5 Residential District residential designation. A total of 4 acres support the proposed improvement program. The properties have been managed over the past decade incorporating tree spading trees, erecting a fence buffer along the easement entitlements on the adjacent Pickway Court homes, preparing several trees for future relocation within the properties and maintaining the existing drainage systems After several years of exploring alternative designs, "Demarest Pointe" neighborhood evolved with a priority to achieve sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity. Demarest Pointe achieves minimum traffic impacts (3 trips entering - 9 trips exiting, am and 10 trips entering - 6 trips exiting, pm), a priority for tree preservation and accommodating in excess of a 100 -year storm event in a park like setting. The Demarest Pointe neighborhood provides a total of 24 Townhome Residences arranged in six (6) buildings with four (4) residences per building, each 1,700 sq ft., 3 bedroom, 3'/2 baths with a one car garage. The residences are positioned on two well defined one way "courtyard" streets with parallel parking, sidewalks and landscape islands. Each residence has a service alley and additional parking. Demarest Pointe is surrounded by the existing forest canopy for the entire perimeter of the neighborhood. There is an extensive sidewalk network that provides access to the Demarest Pointe Post Office, Demarest Pointe Park, Pickway Court, Odgen Elementary School and the Middlesound Loop Multi Use Path. Should you require additional information or clarification, I will welcome the conversation. Please contact me at 910- 231 -2428 or middlesoundlic @yahoo.com Kindest Regards, Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Middlesound LLC Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-2 r k. PBC®® /�► DESIGN . BUILD Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-3 DENlARL:S'S' Yi7IPI1'i A (19nic American ieighA01h00d S,exrnh4xn�iMnMarunweiiay w�ne�ntnnewiarem xarvn�nunmcemwaae� vxKwim,rb�n rm w>m mncxwae�uxo vw�a,, „�mmee�unexww oPUxx N0L+N6K� A MrtecruRt. rtaenPBC ne UIILD auw!'.>e!4awn, reran c ARCHI7ETCNRAI �LE!!AT {ON owxiec av,caa, .PPaos.urc �y..'•N" CAR vc uPf ��1 r�iecnen,ec �+,..,w o "�.•"" xawo. AE Notice For Information Regarding Conditional Rezoning Request Responses Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-4 4/8/2020 Yahoo Mail - Re- 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road Re: 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road From: S stewart (middlesoundllc @ yahoo.com) o: amyshannonIayton @gmaiLcom Dal c: Wednesday, April 8, 2020, 07:56 PM EDT Amy, Good evening. Thank you for reviewing the Notice for Information provided regarding the Conditional Rezoning request. I started visiting Wilmington in 1987, eventually moved here in 1994 to design develop Demarest Landing and Demarest Village. I reside in Demarest Landing. My main profession has been Land Planning and Landscape Architecture for the last 42 years. Middle Sound was originally R -15 zoning to accommodate 15,000 sq.ft. lots to support individual septic tanks and wells. R -15 zoning provided the ability to develop trailer parks. R -20 zoning was enacted in 1988, 1 believe, to eliminate additional trailer parks being built. There was only one way in and one way out of Middle Sound to Market Street at the time when R -15 Zoning was changed to R -20 zoning, thirty two years ago. R -20 zoning has limited controls on the preservation of trees, ingress and egress to a property and storm - -water design, to name a few. This application addresses all those matters, provides conditions to exceed all requirements of all new regulations ensuring the property will be improved to the highest standards. Significant changes have occurred to Middle Sound since the establishment of R -20 zoning. The Conditional Rezoning request specifically complies to the policies of the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development ordinance to promote sustainable, environmentally sound, responsible development and are aligned with the current patterns of growth in the Middle Sound area. Thank you for taking the time to reach out. Best Regards, Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Middlesound LLC On Monday, April 6, 2020, 08:46:47 PM EDT, Amy Layton <amyshannonlayton @gmail.com> wrote: Good Afternoon Mr_ Stewart, 1 am writing to express my concern about a development pan that is proposed at 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road that requires Conditional Rezoning. My concern is that changing the zoning from R -20 to Conditional R -5 would create high density in our community which is not why we Live in this area. This is an issue, especially for the purposed location, duc to the traffic on Nf,SL. Rd. and especially at the round -about and Ogden Elementary being across the street. The area is surrounded by R -20 for reason. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-5 112 4/8/2020 Yahoo Mail - Re: 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road Per the NHC R -20 definition, the pinpose of the Residential -20 (R-20) District is provide lands that accoinniodate primarily very low density residential development and recreational uses. District regulations discourage development that substantially interferes with the quiet residential and recreational nature of the district. With my math this should be a. total of 73 single dwelling homes for the combined 335 acre tract ? ? ?!!! Amy Layton Art Director /Owner TrueForm Graphics 91 0.471.0977 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-6 212 Notice For Information Regarding Conditional Rezoning Request To Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents 3 -30 -20 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-7 412/2020 FW: Middle Soured From: Schuler, Brad (bschuler@nhcgov.com) To: scottstewart Date; Friday, March 13, 2020, 04:09 PM EDT Yahoo Mail - FW. Middle Sound Here are the addresses for the community meetina. Brad Sct;ules j Senior Manner Manning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 V'Vilmingtor, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7444 p j (910) 798-7053 f ,,vv- !v,j.ni;c g� com From: Townsend, John <jownsend @nhcgov.com> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 11:33 AM To: Schuler, Brad <bschule @nhcgov.com> Subject: Middle Sound See attached O,Dhn Townsend I Planning Goordinat& Planning & rand Use - Planning & Zoning Nrev,! Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 lfyijmington, UC 28403 (9101798-7443 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 y, "y,nrd.nhCgoy.con1 i Mailout_Middle Sound Corner.xlsx 30.2kB �n Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-8 Owner AMODIO AMANDA J ARMITAGE LUKE E CHRISTINA M ATKINS FRANCES BAILEY JOHN LEE MARY ELLEN BAKER WILLIAM C JR ASHLEY D BALKUS ANTHONY J III KAREN MARIE BREWINGTON RUDY JUDITH BURTON EARL E III CINDY CAPUTO NICHOLAS A CARRIER MATTHEW J ETAL CLAMDIGGER PROPERTY GROUP LLC CORNELIUS ALEXANDRA M JORDAN R CRUTCHFIELD NATHANAEL L MARGARET A DLFFENBAUGH MICHAEL L ANNETTE DOUGLAS CYNTHIA M EVERHART STEVEN H J MEREDITH EXLINE DEAN D KRIS ANN GIOIELLI JOSEPH C ETAL HALL J SCOTT HALL JOHN EDWARD HINSON ERIC T TAMMY P HOWARD MATTHEW COLLEEN JOHNSEN WILLIAM ELAINE A KAHN BARBARA KAISER CALVIN E DONNA H KELLEHER PATRICIA L MRS KELLY STEVEN BLAIR NICOLE MARIE KING RUBY M KITT SIMEON A TIARA ATKINS KRANCHALK LAURA N JAY MICHAEL LAMB JAMES M KAYE D LANDRES THFODORE BARRY LAYTON KEITH N SHERRY E LESTER BRYANT W 11 LU YU X KIN F YFUNG MCFAYDEN CHARLENE W DENNIS W MIDDLESOUND LLC MILLARD ANN C MORY EDNA H JAVIER F MURRAY BLANCHE LEONA B NEW HAN CNTY BD OF EDUCATION PRINCETON PLACE HOA PRINTY DONALD ROGERS BARBIE SBOTI KAREN L SHIVAR GLENN E TIFFANY W Owner—Address 3608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 1037 CLIFF RD 104 PICKWAY CT 7100 OYSTER LN 103 PICKWAY CT 7101 OYSTER LN 1820 WILD WILLOW TR 4006 GLEN ARBOR DR 7109 HAVEN WAY 7101 HAVEN WAY 7204 ADONIS CT 126 BRANDYWINE CIR W 246 BEDFORD RD W 242 BEDFORD RD W 3613 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 528 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 402 JEWELL PT 7100 HAVEN WAY 214 SIMMONS DR 1105 LT. CONGLETON RD 138 BRANDYWINE CIR W 7107 OYSTER LN 254 BEDFORD RD W 101 PICKWAY CT 118 BRANDYWINE CIR W 535 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 342 LOCKERBY LN 122 BRANDYWINE CIR W 102 PICKWAY CT 7112 OYSTER LN 7104 OYSTER LN 403 FAITH CT 7108 OYSTER LN 334 LOCKERBY LN 105 PICKWAY CT 608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 6933 RUNNINGBROOK TER 407 FAITH CT 7105 HAVEN WAY 130 BRANDYWINE CIR W 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE 7432 NAUTICA YACHT CLUB DR 100 PICKWAY CT 3601 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 404 JEWELL PT Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -12-9 Owner city WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ASHEBORO, NC 27203 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 FORT WORTH, TX 76134 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28405 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 BOLIVIA, NC 28422 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SMITH RANDALL THERESA TAYLOR STEPHEN J CHARLENE K UHLMAN MISTY D LVINxN011x 91.111YA10aNvilI a20 WESNER KATRIN WILKERSON G ALLEN ETAL YELLS GARRY ETAL 402 FAITH CT 2029 EASTWOOD RD APT 144 3618 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 338 LOCKERBY LN 406 FAITH CT 3605 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 346 LOCKERBY LN Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 10 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 - - -- -- - -- MAGNOLIA 8207 MARKET ST 5TE P WILMINGTON, NC 28411 -9192 368641 -0405 (800)275 -8777 04/02/2020 09:23 AM Product Oty unit Price Price First -Class Mail @ - - -1 $0.55 Letter, (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Wei0t:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estill -Led Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.001 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.1j0 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weigh-t:0 Lip 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed AMCL111t:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (FORT WORTH, TX 76134) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Monday 04/05/2020) Geri of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mai12 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Dornesti.c) (BOLIVIA, NC 28422) (Weight,0 Lb 0.80 Oz?- (Esti mate' l.v.er „:��t ='.' "� (Saturdw 1/ Cert of Mai),, (Affixed Ai___,arff:$0,00) First -Class Mail& 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28+11) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 07) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amaunt:$0.00) First -Class Mail® 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (BOLIVIA, NC 28422) (Weight:0 LL 0.8r: 67) (Estimated L'�: (Saturday Oe' -` Cert of Mail $1.50 Bo46fcffi0biInh s'sioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 11 First -Class Ma Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTONl, (We4ght:0 i_b 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Dat (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cori of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0,00) First -Class Mai16 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:D Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delive =Y Dat (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28417) {Weiclht,O LG 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Dat (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cori of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class MailO 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight :O Lb 0,80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Da (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail& 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28411 (Welght:O Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Da (Saturday 04/04/200) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amcunt:$O.CO) First -Class Mail@ 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411 (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Da (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail& 1 Letter (Domestics (WILMINGTON, NC 28411 (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Da (Saturday 04104/2020) Cori of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) Fir'st-Class Mal 16 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 2840 (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery D (Saturday 04 /04/2020) Cori of Mail (Rffixed Amaunt'$0 -00 First -Class Mail@ 1 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 2840 (Weight:0 Lb {Estimated Doi (Saturday 04 Cert of Mail IAf f i vimA Al ni ${x.55 First -C1 ass Letter (Domesti " (WILMING' :iN, NC 28411.) Date 55 $0.55 $1.50 55 $0.55 $1.50 55 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $0 °a5 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) Dat (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1.50 (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cent of Mail (Affixed Amount:$O.CO) $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04 /04/2020) $1.50 Cert of Mail $ ©.55 $0.55 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail& 1 $0. Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) e) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1.50 (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0. Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0,80 Oz) e) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) $1.50 Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) 55 $0.55 $1.50 55 $0.55 $1.50 55 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $0 °a5 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) Dat (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1.50 (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cent of Mail (Affixed Amount:$O.CO) $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 Letter Dat (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1'50 (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail (Affixed Amount:$0.00) $0.55 $0.55 First -Class MailO 1 $0 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28409) (Weight °0 Lb 0.80 Oz) te) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1.50 (Saturday 04/O4/2020) Cert of Mail $0.55 $0.55 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mai m 1 $0 Letter (Domestic) > (WILMINGTON, NO 28411) (Weighi:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) te) (Estimated Delivery Date) $1 b0 (Saturday 04/04 /2020) Cert of Mail $0.55 $0.55 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0 Letter (Domestic) 5) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) Da (Estimated Delivery Date) $1.50 (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cori of Mail } (Affixed AMOLInt:$0_00) $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail(b 1 $C Letter �) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28411) (Weight:O Lt; (Estimated . Board of Commissioners -July (atW28y (, $ITNO: 7:- 12Csd9L of Mai 1 In -F tF - 4 , 55 55 55 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0,55 is $1.50 55 $0.5` $1.50 (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28411) 55 55 55 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0.55 $1.50 $0,55 is $1.50 55 $0.5` $1.50 _... - First -Class 55 $0.55 First -Class Ma 55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Dopiest i E; : f Dourest i C ) (WILMINGT(:'iF, ��'.: �. �;. (WILMINGTONa ii1} (Weight;0 l.b 0.80 Oz) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 Cori of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mails 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail& 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Domestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28405) (WILMINGTON, NO 28412) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First- -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class MailU 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Demestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON. NO 28411) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cori of Mail $1.50 Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amourtt:$0,00) (Affixed AMOU11t : $0. 00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Domestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28405) (ASHEBORO, NC 27203) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04 /2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mall $1.50 Cori of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Am0Unt :$0.00) (Affixed Amount :$0.00) First -Class Mail& 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mailb 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Leiter (Domestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28412) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail! 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Domestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NO 28405) (WILMINGTON. NC 28411) (WeighT:O Lb 0.80 02) (Weight;0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04(12020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Ameunt:$0.00) (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 First--Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $03.55 Letter Letter (Domestic) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weighi:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 Cort of Mail $1-_50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mail& 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter ( Domestic) (Domestic) - (WILMINGTON, NC 28405) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Weight :O Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cerl of Mail $1.50 Cori of Mail $.1.50 (Affixed Amount- $0.00) (Affixed Antount:$0.00) FirsT -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 First -Class Mailg 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter Letter (Domesti(,,) (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 284111 (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:O Lb n ° °" `.': (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 07) (Estimate, (Estimated ; .. (Saturday (Saturday 0 Cert of Mail $ Board of Commissioners -CPTi f $1,50 (Affixed A+ (f� Am ITEM: 7 - 12 - 13 First -Class K 55 0. Letter (Domestic (WILMINGTuiv, NG 28405) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 07) (Estimated Delivery Date, (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amourit:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0,80 02) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/202(7) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mails 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Dolivery Date) (Saturday 09/04/20)20) Geri of Mail $1 50 (Affixed Amaunt:$0.00) First -Class Mailg 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:D Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) 0ieight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/44/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amour{t:$0.00) First -Class Mail® 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) ( Saturday 04/04 /2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Saturday 04/04/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Aff i xed AMount : $0.00 ) First -Class Mail® 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28403) (Weight:0 Lb 0.80 02) (Estimated Delivery Date) CSd2ur day C1F1y641?!?nn. $1 50 Geri of Mail (Affixed Amount:'; Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 14 f Total: - - -- `104,55 Debft Card Remit'd $104.55 {Card Name:VISA) (account #:XXXXXXXXXXXX6824) (Approval #) (Transaction #:600) (Receipt #;028926) (Debit Card Purchaso:$104.55) (Cash Back:$0.00) (AID:AOOO0000980840 Chip) (AL:US DEBIT) (PIN:Verified) Preview your Mail Track your Packages Sian up for FREE C www.informeddelivery.com All sales final on stamps and postage. Refunds for guaranteed services only. Thank you for Your business. HELP US SERVE YOU BETTER TELL US ABOUT YOUR RECENT POSTAL EXPERIENCE Go to: https : / /postalexperienr-e.com /Pos 840 -5280 -0642- 003 - 00041 - 70232 -02 or scan this code with .your mobile device: Q •�• � 1 fr UL 1� or call 1-800- 410 -7420. YOUR OPINION COUNTS Receipt #: 840 - 52800642 -3- 4170232 -2 Clerk: 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 15 �, UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POST4LSERVIC a. Nlailin meter postage here This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has heen presented to USPSe for maiting. This form may be used for dcmestic and intemationai mail. — From: .._._ -- .........._ - -. -- Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 -- Postmark Here To: BURTUN-EARL E III CINDY 4006 GLEN ARBOR RR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or 92POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing meter postage here This Certificate of Mah[ou provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® for mailing This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: - - Middlesound LLC _ 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 2841 TO: IAMB JAME5_M KAYED - -- - -- PostmarK Here 7104 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 �-y UNITED -jr rl /f� Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTALSER'ir #��n. Ma meter postage here This Cerificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to uSPSe for mailing. Thls form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: - - -- - Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here MORY- EONA- H]AV[ERI- 7105 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9055 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 16 U ITEDSTATES Certificate Of fce affix POSTAL SERVICE, MailIr� TmetperVpostagehere. or This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing - This form may be used for domestic and intemational mail_ From: -- - .._. -- - -- - Middlesound LLC -- 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: -- — Postmark Here CAPUTO NICHOLAS A 7109 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 NS Form Sbl !, April 2007 F'SN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 2 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To Fay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL SERVICEc_ Mailer meter Postage here This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSC for mailing. This form may be used far domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here MURRAY BLANCHE LEG A -B 130 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITEDSTWE,S Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL. SERVICE, Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® for mailing. This form may he used for domestic and inlernatianai mall. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: CORNELIUS ALEXANDRX -M JURUAN R— Postmark Here 126 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 17 r. V'02-POSTAL UNiTED STATES Certificate Of _ SERVICE Mailing mete p slag lherernpsor This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: ..._..._... _.......- - - -., _... ..._ - - - Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: WFLXERSON -GAZLEN ETAL Pos €mark Here 3605 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of 92 ��ly�pg p�� 7a pay fee, affix stamps or !�OSTALSE VpCQ Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSfl for mailing. This form may be used for dornest�c and internatanai mail. FTom: ----- - - - - -- - - -- _ -._ _ —... - Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here To: SBOTI KAREN L 3602 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9055 UNITEDSTdTES Certificate Of To POSTAL SERVICE, Mailin cJ. meterpFostagahee. or This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: EVERFTART STEVEN H JR MEREI]ITFl-- - - -___ Postmark Here 528 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Ps Form 3817, April 2007 -PSff 7590 -02 -000 -13065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 18 • t uNI TED STATES Certificate Of POSTU SJERVICE,n Mailin This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented fo USPse for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: MIDDLESOUND LLC 6933 RUNNINGBROOK TER WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. Postmark Here UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of fee, affix POST13L SERV CElr, Mailing meterypostage heremps or. This Certificate of Mailino provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSQ for mailing This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middiesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To; rif1S]SV N LtiiC i " "t AMMY-I'' — Postmark Here 138 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 Ps Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 1, NITEDSTATES Certificate of OSTALS�'RVICE, Mailing meterypostageherempsar f- This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: -- - -- Middiesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: ITWCN IY13D OF EDUCAl7CYN— Postmark Here 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD — WILMINGTON, NC 28412 PS Form 3817, April 2407 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 19 • f V — V UNITED STATES Certificate Of To _ POSTAL >�ERVI E; Mailing meter postageherempsor This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS�1) for mailing - This form may be used for domestic and international mail- ._______ .. - -- From: - - - -- ....-- --._ -- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: rCENG R-UBY Vf - - -- postmark Here 122 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 - 02-000 -9065 A2UNITED STATES Certificate Of _ POSTAL SERVICZ, Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS� for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and internafionai mail. From: — Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: 00-U i AS CTNT H I,A M 3613 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD W1LM.INGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. Postmark Here UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay tee, affix stamps or �-y,p°i ` ro ST f SERVICE, Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate o_fMaaNng provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSM for maiiing- This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here To: C7iO1ECL1 JOS -EPN C ETAL ..... - -_. - - - - -- 7100 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28405 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 20 I f. V UNITED SUITES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing, This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS& for mailing This form may be used for domestic and international mail. Middlesound LLC - 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: 1:3AILEY JOFIN LEE - MARY- EL-LEN...____. -_ - . - - - -. 7100 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 —1,- UNITLD STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE,, Mailing This Gertifcate of ti provfdes evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® for mailing. This form may be Used for domestic and international mail, - From: Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix Stamps or meter postage here. Postmark Here To pay fee, affix stamps cr meter postage here To; zAYTON- KEITH- N- SHERRY E - _.__ -__ _. _.., Postmark Here 7108 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 P5 Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate ®f - -- To pay fee, ax POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing metier postage here�ps or This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSC for mailing. , his form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: - .......... - -- Middiesound LLC - 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: NEW -HAN CNiY130 OF EDULA710N Postmark Here 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 21 f UNITED SRITE.S Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE`: Mailing This Cer.ifieata of Marlin provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and interaa@onal mail, From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or mater postage here. To: PRIN FY- D01VACD Postmark Here 7432 NAUTICA YACHT CLUB DR _. WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, sta F'OSTI -IL SERVICE, Mailing meter stagfeherempsar This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USP50 for mailing. This form may de used for domestic and internal:onal mall. From: - - - -- Middlesound LLC - -- 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: ARM ITAGk LUKE -E UHWS-I INA_Nf 1037 CLIFF RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Postmark Here UN TED i &ES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL SERYICE.. Mailing meter postage here TNs Certifcate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for malling- This form may be used for domestic and lnternaGonal mail. From: _ -.. . _.. .........._...------. ._ — Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: Postmark Here IrArsl:A�viN-t I3EJNNAR -- 118 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2-l- PSN 7530- 02 -0D0 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 22 J ITE ®ST/ ES Certificate Of _50 pay - npSer QSZJS I Mailin m eter postage ! ijoreThis Certificate of Mailing provides evidence iha€ mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail From: - - - -- -_ . - - - - -. _.._ ..- - - - -- -- - Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28431 To: A_RT 9fARY-K ._- - _. - -- - Post•nark'hfiere 338 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28431 PS Porm 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 — UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE., Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. To: --- Po5tf37atk:Here STI7EITHRAND7aLCTHERE5,4 -- 402 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 �, UNIT DS'TATES Certificate Of To pay fee. affix stamps or POSTAL SERVICE,, Mailing meter postage here, This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS� for mailing. This form maybe used for domestic and intemat:unal mail, From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LESTER 13RYANT W I.I- Postmark Here 334 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 _ PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000- -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 23 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, aiTix stamps or ,V�V�T� S�illCm Mallrl meter poSfageheYe. W2— This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been Presented to USPS® Tor mailing. This farm may ne used for domestic and international mail- From: - -- - -- - --- _- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here To: BREW [N GTO W IRUDY7UD1TH;= 1820 WILD WILLOW TR FORT WORTH, TX 76134 PS Form MIT April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -WC 9015 UNITED STATES Certifica te Mailing Of To pay fee affix stamps or p� OS� /ILSE VICE- IMIailin meterposl-agehere. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USi'S0 for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: __- - Middlesound LLC _ 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here Ta: PRINCETON PIACE HDA' 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE BOLIVIA, NC 28422 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or ®S�f1i. SFR.VICEn, ;�j[j meter postage here , This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented fo USPSa For ma'�.ling. This farm may he used for domestic and international mail. From: ... - ... - -- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 postmark Here To: KAHN BARB ARA 101 PICKWAY CT -WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 24 p�UNITED SUITES certificate Of To y lea, affix POST3bSEf8 ICE. Mailing metterpostagehere. or This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mai €ins. This form may be used for domestic and iniemational mail. Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: PRIKET0[11 PLACE HOA` _ — Postmark Here 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE BOLIVIA, NC 28422 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 JG— UNITED STUES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE „, Mailing mePe yp slage here. or This Certiiioate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and intemailona! mail. From: - - -- - - Middlesound LLC _ 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: OHNSEN WILLIAM ELAINE.A '— - - Postmark Here 254 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix J POSTAL SERVICE, Mails ng meter postage herampsor a. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mai ling. This form may be used for domestic and irtemationai mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: SHIVAR -GLENN E TIFFANY W - -- 404JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 25 Postmark Here 4F I, UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing metery postage here�psor This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® fof mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: ____--------------- .__ - -- ---- - - - - -- - Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 T« BAKER L]VfLLTAM -UR -ASHLEY t3 - — - Postmark Here 103 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE; Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence That mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: ...----- ._._._ ... Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. To: DEFFENSAUGFIVICHAEL_L ANNETTE.._ Postmark Here 242 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 --000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing This Cerlifica €e of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and intemat €onal mail. From: Middlesound LLC _ 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. _____, postmark Here T Y D GARRY ETAL 346 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 26 UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SE;4 VICEi Mailing meterp`otageherempspr This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS'J" for mailing. This form may he used for domestic and international mail. From:....... . _ .... ............— -- -... .. Midd[esound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 HALL-I SCCSTT.._. -.__ Postmark Here 214 SIMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, Aprii 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 �' UNITED Certificate Of �. OSTAL SER (ICE, Mailin Ta pay fee, affix stamps or This Certificate of fvlaifino provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS� for maillrto. meter postage here. This form may be Used for domestic: and intermational mail. From: .... —. _ _. ._.__.. — Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: KELLEH E—R PATRi [A L - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- Postmark Here 535 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7534 -02 -000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of i'05TAL SERVICE, Mailin affi x To pay Fee, ax stamps or ![ 6/I meter postage This Certificate of Mallino provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing, his form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: ... --- - - -- -- ._... -- - - -- Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: CLAMDIGGER PR PERIY G- ROUPICUC Postmark Here 7204 ADONIS CT WILMINGTON, NC28405 { PS Form 38'17, Aprii 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 27 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To POSTAL SERVICE, Marlin metterppostage here�Ps�r This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may he used for domestic and international mail From: -Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: HALL JOHN EDWARD - - - -_ Postmark here 1105 LT. CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 AG— � NITg+ y- -�°r _ —. .. ..Certificate Of..._ 7o pay fea :.9i'�A TED S l�1 GS affix sEemps or 1'DSTM SERVICE, Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® for mailing - This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From; Middlesound LLC _6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LU YU X KIN E YEUNG - Postmarks Here 105 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 Ju— t. NITIEDSTATES Certificate Of POSTIR SERVICE, Mailin This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSfl for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and intematsonal mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or melef postage here. T °` BALKUS ANTHONY J it I KAREN MARIE W Postmark Here 7101 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 I f, PS Form 3817, April 2007 P5N 7530 -02 -000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 28 UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and International mail. Prom: --------- -- Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. - - - - -- --- -- - Postmark Here TO MCFAYDEN CHARLENE W DENNIS VIl 608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Ju— UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee. ax OST23LSERVICE, Mailing meter postageherempsor 1— This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® for mailing - This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 T« MILLARD ANN C 407 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Fcrm 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 UNITED STATES Certificate Of TO POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing mepery postage heempsor This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence lhaF mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and internaConal mail. From: — Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: WESNER KATI7IN -- - - -- - -- Postmark Here 406 rAITH CT WILMINGTON, INC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 29 - - -- UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of POS FA SERi/10E,„ Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPST for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail From: - - Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: KELLY STEVEN BLAIR NICOLE MARIE 342 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. - Postmark Here ANUNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix slarnpsor POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of MMailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSo for maling- This form may be used for domestic and inlemational mail. From:- - - - - -- — — Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LANDRES THEODORE BARRY 403 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 - - - -. Postmark Here UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSFALSERVIC& Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSG for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 - -- - -- . —... Postmark Here To: CRUTCHFIELD NATHANAEL L MARGARET A 245 BEDFORD RD W — WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02 -000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 30 - UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of POST/3t SERVICE- Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to usP5(k) for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: - - - - Middlesound LLC _6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: EXLINE DEAN D KRIS ANN 402 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. Postmark Here J —. UNITED STATES Certificate gF Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL ERVICE1 Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of flailing pi €dovlides3evidence that mail has been presented to USPS� far mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail- _ From: — Middlesound LLC _6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 25411 Here To. AMODIO AMANDA J Posirrtark 3608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 NUNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL SER V10Er Mailing meter postage here Th!s Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LkSPS® for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. F rom: Middlesound LLC — 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 _ - -- -- To: HOWARD MATTHEW COLLEEN Postmark Here 7107 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 C. PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 31 NUNITED STATES POSTALSERVICEm �'EftIflC�t�iiflS�a�1� ry To payfea,a stamps or This Cer -, Middlesound LLC Frain: --- 5933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 KRANCHALK LAURA N JAY MICHAEL -- Pnshmark Here 7112 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Fom, N . _... - -- -- - - - - - - - UNITED STATES APOSTALSE VICEo GertificateOfMailinc� Touayfea.orusmrps.1 - -- M"tG, -PO =_Sage hors h Tswm', Middlesound LLC T ' s iorm Fr °m_ 5933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: --- ___._....... .............. ..-- -- -. —..__. _...__.. CARRIER MATTHEW J ETAL. 7101 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 381. - Postmark Here UNITEDSTATES POSTAL SERVICE® Cert ro aaY ae, a a ?tamp, e: ificate Of Mailin�c meter postage here. 'log. Thy crr Middlesound LLC Fr°m: --- 5933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Toy - --........... _. - - - - -- - - _.--- - - - - -- Postmark Here - TAYLOR STEPHEN J CHARLENE K 2029 EASTWOOD RD APT 144 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Ps Form 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 32 MAGNOLIA - '----- �^ - - - - -= - 8207 MARKET ST STE P WILMINGTON, NC 28411 -9192 368641 -0405 (800)275 -8777 04/03/2020 03 :21 PM Product - - - - - -- Qty � Unit Price Pr, i ce J -- - - -- First -Class Mail@ 1$0.55 - $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.70 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Monday 04/06/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.70 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date) (Monday 04/05/2020) Cart of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter, (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:O Lb 0.70 0z) - (Estimated Delivery Date) (Monday 04/06/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount:$0.00) First -Class Mail@ 1 $0.55 $0.55 Letter (Domestic) (WILMINGTON, NC 28411) (Weight:0 Lb 0.70 Oz) (Estimated Delivery Date? (Monday 04/06/2020) Cert of Mail $1.50 (Affixed Amount :$0.00) Total: C Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 33 UNITEDSTATE.S Certifica � y POST13L SERVICE, K This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS® k This form may be used for domestic and international mall. From: - -- - - - -- -.. _.. - -- - -- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 _ N n �c >a)m o 0- yznK3 //j Z5, �o Z� To, UHLMAN MISTY D 4 3618 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD � o D (7 v WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNiTEL9 STATES Certificat 1'OST13L SERVICE Ma This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has heart presented to USPSO for This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: -.- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace > Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 N� �ume� To: ATKINS-FiANCEY - - _ 1074 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530 -02- 000 -9065 v�u This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPS "p for c his farm may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC — - 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 KITT SIMEON A TIARA ATKINS — - 102 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530- 02 -000 -9065 From: .._- . ..... ..... .. Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 100 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 °A —ry o j =to ' zrn0 cn CN ^0-4in ox to z n a a a n *mac p ...L arm' zmo En z ! �° OM> Q � z ca m z ca C] D d 4 y nc D3. y�N min m 03 te r p -mn n a_ o C3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530- fl2 - � i fh?5 - 12 - 34 C Second Notice For Information Regarding Conditional Rezoning Request 5 -15 -20 To Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents Regarding Community Meeting May 28, 2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 35 MIDDLESOUND LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, NC 28411 May 15, 2020 TO: Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents FROM: Middlesound LLC RE: Second Notice for Information Regarding a Conditional Rezoning Request Gear Neighbors, This is a Second Notice for information for all my Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners in the proximity of Middlesound LLC properties. The information contained in the notice is to inform you of a request by Middlesound LLC to New Hanover County to rezone the property located at 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road. In addition, the election to request a Conditional Rezoning will be applied for that provides the opportunity to establish specific standards and conditions unique only to this application and property to ensure a like kind neighborhood application and property would be required to meet the level of detail provided with identical conditions such as location, stormwater design, tree preservation and traffic patterns which will all be further discussed during the New Hanover County Planning Board and New Hanover County Commissioners procedures. The Notice for Information provided to you on March 30,2020 (attached) was directed by the New Hanover County Planning Department Planning in lieu of conducting a Community Meeting due to the current limitations for assembly of gatherings from the COVID -19 restrictions. A Community Meeting was scheduled for April 6th and Th however was cancelled due to the limitations of COVID -19 which then required to provide the required Notice for Information and open a dialogue through emails, phone conversations and for those that desired "on site" discussions provided the require social distancing protocols would be practiced. Since my profession involves communication with neighbors, designing, developing and building communities, I desire to continue the communications beyond what has been required on line and in person over the past two months. I have arranged to continue the conversation at Community Meeting before the Planning Board and Commissioners meeting to ensure the request is fully understood by my neighbors and correct information is being communicated regarding the achievements and compliance of this new neighborhood for our community with a priority of sustaining the health, safety, welfare, environment and character of the community I have been involved with for over 30 years and resided in for the past 26 years with my family that continues to grow here in Middlesound. I am optimistic that Phase 2 of reopening the State of North Carolina is imminent this month so I have arranged to have a Community Meeting on May 28, 2020 at Peace Baptist Church, 325 Military Cutoff Road, Wilmington, NC, 28411 from 6:OOPM to 8:00 PM. Dr Rudy Sheppard was kind enough to reserve the 280, provided our meeting is limited to no more than ten (10) neighbors at a time in his facility and provided the Govemor's office permits public gatherings by May 28, 2020 at Peace Baptist Church. Dr. Sheppard is a great friend and neighbor to provide this opportunity. Dr. Sheppard was my next -door neighbor from 1995 -1997 while I was building Demarest Landing, a very generous, giving, visionary community leader. I want to honor, respect Dr. Sheppard's enthusiasm and optimism for us to gather and meet, however, it may be canceled should gathering not be permitted by May 28, 2020. Since we are, and probably will be, under attendance limitations, should the meeting date be authorized, please send your name, address and email contact information to middlesoundilc(@,yahoo.com in order for us to schedule a time for those interested in personally meeting to review, discuss and clarify any information provided in the Middlesound LLC application available on the New Hanover County Planning Department web site regarding the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The Community Meeting is envisioned to initially provide four �4) 30- minute time periods that could accommodate up to nine (9) neighbors at a time. Once we have a list of those that will be interested in attending, I will send to the email you have provided a time for you to attend on May 28, 2020: either 6:00 PM to 6:30 PM; 6:30PM to 7:00PM; 7:OOPM to 7:30PM; 7:30PM to 8:0013M so you will not have to be waiting when you arrive. All attendees will be required to sign in at the entrance within the time provided to you the day before the Community Meeting. Looking forward to seeing you there. Kindest Regards, Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA; MlddlesouWO6 &of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 36 D E M A REST P 0 IN T E N A R R A T I V E Middlesound LLC is requesting a Conditional Rezoning request to allow the currently zoned R -20 designation to Conditional Rezoning R -5 Residential District Designation (C2 -R -5) in accordance with New Hanover County's Unified Development Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan for 504 & 3626 Middle Sound hoop Road (3.35 acres). The Conditional Rezoning request from R -20 to CZ -R -5 will provide the opportunity to create a neighborhood program of twenty -four townhomes woven within the fabric of the existing properties features exemplifying sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity to been known as Demarest Pointe. The properties are being designed developed by Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA of Middlesound LLC whom has resided in the Middle Sound area since 1994 and has design developed Demarest Landing and Demarest Village neighborhoods (1993 — 2009) and resides in Demarest Landing. The townhome residence program will be built by Dave Spetrino PBC Design Build. Dave was the first Builder invited to build the Demarest Village neighborhood in 1999 involving Townhomes, Row Homes and Charleston Side Homes. Dave and Scott are excited to join for a collaboration to realize the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. Since the commencement of assembling the land holdings from 2004 — 2005 and in preparation for the future development 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road, Middlesound LLC in 2009 assigned easement entitlements for access, utilities and stormwater drainage on adjacent properties to the south along Pickway Court, all awned by Middlesound LLC. The easement entitlements (approximately .72 acres) are adjacent to and exclusively support the access, utilities and stormwater drainage regarding the proposed 3.35 acres rezoning request for C2- R -5R -5. A total of 4.07 acres support the proposed improvement program for the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The properties are at an average elevation of +27, natural drainage is to the east to are existing drainage system, there are no wetlands present, the properties are not in a flood zone and are serviced by all required utilities. The properties have been managed over the past decade incorporating tree spading trees, erecting a fence buffer along the easement entitlements on the adjacent Pickway Court homes, preparing several trees for future relocation within the properties and maintaining the existing drainage systems.. After several years of exploring alternative designs, "Demarest Pointe" neighborhood evolved with a priority to achieve sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity. Demarest Pointe achieves preservation of 95% of the existing 845 trees on the properties (2" -20" DBH ... diameter at breast height) which include 75% tree retention of the existing Protected Trees (8 " -24 "' DBH). Demarest Pointe townhome residence program provides diversity for housing choices for the Middle Sound Community and is supported by a stormwater program sculpted in a park setting that will exceed a 100 year storm eventwhich has been evaluated by CSD Engineering. The stormwater program will provide all stormwater created by the new improvements will be managed within the 4.07 acres provided to support the new improvements ensuring stormwater runoff from Demarest Pointe 4.07 acres will equal the existing stormwater runoff before Demarest Pointe was developed. Demarest Pointe is uniquely positioned at the confluence of Middle Sound Loop Road and Darden Road Round -A -Bout, across from Ogden Elementary School and at the apex of pedestrian connectivity routes with direct access to the Middle Sound Multi Use Path that will soon connect to Market Street, Wrightsville Beach and Marsh Oaks in Porters Neck. The neighborhood program will provide minimum traffic impacts to the Middle Sound Loop Road corridor as reviewed by NCDOT with 3 trips entering - 9 trips exiting, am and 10 trips entering - 6 trips exiting, pm in accordance with the required compliance to institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 37 The Demarest Pointe neighborhood provides a total of 24 Townhome Residences arranged in six (6) buildings with four (4) residences per building, each 1,700 sq ft., 3 bedroom, 3 Maths with a one car garage. The residences are positioned on two well defined one way "courtyard" streets with parallel parking, sidewalks and landscape islands minimizing impervious coverage. Each residence has a service alley and additional parking. Demarest Pointe is surrounded by the existing forest canopy for the entire perimeter of the neighborhood. There is an extensive Demarest Pointe neighborhood sidewalk network that provides access to the Demarest Pointe Past Office, Demarest Pointe Park, Pickway Court, Odgen Elementary School and the Middlesound Loop Mufti Use Path. Each residence will be approximately 1,700 sq. ft., 3- bedroom with the first - floor bedroom as a home office option, 3112 baths and one car garage. Each residence will be serviced with an access alley that provides a driveway with adequate parking for one car and one additional car leading to the one car garage. Each residence will be fronting a one -way street with parallel guest parking providing one guest parking space per residence with five additional available spaces within the neighborhood providing 3.2 spaces for each residence. The only entrance driveway to Demarest Pointe neighborhood is on the northern property line along Middlesound Loop Road 475 linear feet from the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout pedestrian crossing. The entrance driveway will be twelve feet (17) wine with an interior driveway and street radius of 45' to accommodate all vehicles with vehicular circulation limited to a counterclockwise movement throughout the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. The entire existing tree canopy along the northern property line of Demarest Pointe will be preserved along the street corridor of Middle Sound Loup Road except for the proposed entrance driveway and utility connections. The only exit of the Demarest Pointe neighborhood is located along the southern property line along Middle Sound Loop Road 400 linear feet from the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout pedestrian crossing and across from Ogden Elementary School. The exit driveway is 75' northwest of the Ogden Elementary School driveway for School Bus circulation providing adequate separation for visibility and safe movements for Ogden Elementary and the exit only driveway for the Demarest' Pointe neighborhood. The exit driveway alignment also preserves the existing forested perimeter buffer on Demarest Pointe directly across from the Ogden School Bus Ingress /Egress driveway providing no interruption on the existing conditions and movements of the school bus patterns. In addition, the entire existing tree canopy along the southern property line of Demarest Pointe neighborhood, across from Ogden Elementary School, will be preserved except for the exit driveway. Demarest Pointe Is located within the General Residential Place Types of the New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan that states " The ideal density for multi- and single- family residential is low (ranging up to approximately eight units per acre) " and "Building height could range from one to three stories ". Demarest Pointe complies with the Framing Policies to "Promote environmentally responsible growth; Promote Fiscally responsible growth; Preserve and protect water quality and supply and Provide for a range of housing types, opportunities and choices ". Demarest Pointe has been designed as a Performance Residential neighborhood in accordance with the New Hanover County Unified Development Ordinance and section 3.2.11 Residential Moderate- High Density (R -5) District criteria with a "Density, maximum (dwelling unitslacre)" of "8" [ 3.35 acres x 8 = 26.81 and "Building height, maximum (feet)" of 15 "'. As stated, 4.07 acres are provided to support 24 residences. Demarest Pointe will exemplify the spirit, intent of the policies for growth and development of New Hanover County and compliment the diverse character of the Middle Sound Community. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 38 fnd4uls of TTunspofiolon agineur UTQ Up Geawmion MaFkual Csitmaled NMhOF Of MPS Generated lard Use ':z' I I ,� � I [ f I I o—U-4 e I Traffic Impact- UrAc Impad AnnN* (RA) Must Be CmVhied for AU Proposed Developmenis Tho rionfiniale More Than 100 NA Hour Trips 13 s.. 77 Board of Commissioners - Ju y 13,2020 ' ITEM: 7 - 12 - 41 MIDDLESOUND LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, NC 28411 March 30, 2020 TO: Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners and Residents FROM: Middlesound LLC RE: Notice for Information Regarding a Conditional Rezoning Request Dear Neighbors, This is a Notice for information for all my Adjacent and Nearby Property Owners in the proximity of Middlesound LLC properties. The information contained in the notice is to inform you of a request by Middlesound LLC to New Hanover County to rezone the property located at 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road. In addition, the election to request a Conditional Rezoning will be applied for that provides the opportunity to establish specific standards and conditions pertaining to this application during the New Hanover County Planning Board and Commissioners procedures. This Notice for Information was directed by the New Hanover County Planning Department Planning in lieu of conducting a Community Meeting due to the current limitations for assembly of gatherings from the Coronavirus restrictions. As required by the County, this Notice of Information is sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the property boundary and available to all other interested parties. Middlesound LLC is requesting a Conditional Rezoning Request to allow the currently zoned R -20 designation to Conditional R -5 Residential District designation in accordance with New Hanover County's Unified Development Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan for 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road (3.35 acres). The properties are at an average elevation of +27, with no wetlands present, are not in a flood zone and are serviced by all required utilities. Since assembling these properties in 2004, in preparation for the future development 500 & 3625 Middle Sound Loop Road, Middlesound LLC in 2000 assigned easement entitlements for access, utilities and stormwater drainage on adjacent properties to the south along Pickway Court, all owned by Middlesound LLC. The easement entitlements (approximately .7 acres) are adjacent to and support the access, utilities and stormwater drainage regarding the proposed 3.35 acres rezoning request for Conditional R -5 Residential District residential designation. A total of 4 acres support the proposed improvement program. The properties have been managed over the past decade incorporating tree spading trees, erecting a fence buffer along the easement entitlements on the adjacent Pickway Court homes, preparing several trees for future relocation within the properties and maintaining the existing drainage systems After several years of exploring alternative designs, "Demarest Pointe" neighborhood evolved with a priority to achieve sustainability, diversity, ecology and connectivity. Demarest Pointe achieves minimum traffic impacts (3 trips entering - 9 trips exiting, am and 10 trips entering - 6 trips exiting, pm), a priority for tree preservation and accommodating in excess of a 100 -year storm event in a park like setting. The Demarest Pointe neighborhood provides a total of 24 Townhome Residences arranged in six (6) buildings with four (4) residences per building, each 1,700 sq ft., 3 bedroom, 3 % baths with a one car garage. The residences are positioned on two well defined one way "courtyard" streets with parallel parking, sidewalks and landscape islands, Each residence has a service alley and additional parking. Demarest Pointe is surrounded by the existing forest canopy for the entire perimeter of the neighborhood. There is an extensive sidewalk network that provides access to the Demarest Pointe Post Office, Demarest Pointe Park, Pickway Court, Odgen Elementary School and the Middlesound Loop Multi Use Path. Should you require additional information or clarification, I will welcome the conversation. Please contact me at 910- 231 -2428 or middlesoundllc @yahoo.com Kindest Regards, Scott D Stewart RLA ASLA Middlesound LLC Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 42 Owner Owner–Address Owner City AMODIO AMANDA 3608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ARMITAGE LUKE E CHRISTINA M 1037 CLIFF RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 ATKINS FRANCES 104 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BAILEY JOHN LEE MARY FLLFN 7100 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BAKER WILLIAM C JR ASHLEY D 103 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BALKUS ANTHONY J III KAREN MARIE 7101 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BREWINGTON RUDY JUDITH 1820 WILD WILLOW TR FORT WORTH, TX 76134 BURTON EARL E III CINDY 4006 GLEN ARBOR DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CAPUTO NICHOLAS A 7109 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CARRIER MATTHEW J ETAL 7101 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CLAM DIGGER PROPERTY GROUP LLC 7204 ADONIS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28405 CORN ELI US ALEXANDRA M JORDAN R 126 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CRUTCHFIELD NATHANAEL L MARGARET 246 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 DEFTENBAUGH MICHAEL L ANNETTE 242 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 DOUGLAS CYNTHIA M 3613 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 EVERHART STEVEN H J MEREDITH 528 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 EXLINE DEAN D KRIS ANN 402 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 GIOIELLI JOSEPH C ETAL 7100 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28405 HALL) SCOTT 214 SIMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 HALL JOHN EDWARD 1105 LT. CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 HINSON ERIC T TAMMY P 138 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 HOWARD MATTHEW COLLEEN 7107 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 JOHNSEN WILLIAM ELAINE A 254 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KAHN BARBARA 101 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 2841.1 KAISER CALVIN E DONNA H 118 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KELLEHER PATRICIA L HRS $35 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KELLY STEVEN BLAIR NICOLE MARIE 342 LOCKERBY LN WILMING TON, NC 28409 KING RUBY M 122 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 KITT SIMEON A TIARA ATKINS 102 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KRAN CHALK LAURA N JAY MICHAEL 7112 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LAMB JAMES M KAYE ❑ 7104 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LANDRES THEODORE BARRY 403 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LAYTON KEITH N SHERRY E 7108 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LESTER BRYANT W II 334 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LU YU X KIN F YEUNG 105 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MCFAYOEN CHARLENE W DENNIS W 608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MIDDLESOUND LLC 6933 RUNNINGBROOK TER WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MILLARD ANN C 407 FAIT -H CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MORY EDNA H JAVIER F 7105 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NEC 28411 MURRAY BLANCHE LEONA B 130 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 NEW HAN CNTY BD OF EDUCATION 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 PRINCETON PLAC£ HOA 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE BOLIVIA, NC 28422 PRINTY DONALD 7432 NAUTICA YACHT CLUB DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ROGERS BARBIE 1.00 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SBOTI KAREN L 3601 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SHIVAR GLENN E TIFFANY W 404 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 -__ - -- _ __.._.__. _.... - -.- 1TENrT = T2-4� SMITH RANQALL THERESA TAYLOR STEPHEN J CHARLENE K UHLMAN MISTY D WERNER STUART MARY K WESNER KATRIN WILKERSON G ALLEN ETAL YELLS GARRY ETAL 402 FAITH CT 2023 EASTWOOD RD APT 144 3618 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 338 LOCKER6Y LN 406 FAITH CT 3605 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD 346 LOCKER$Y LN .... DaW-Df -C mm ssiQnQr-s--_JuLy 13, 2n2n ITEM: 7 - 12 - 44 WILMINGTON, NC 2€3411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH 2O8 CAUSEWAY DR NRIAH7SVILLE BEACH. NC 28480-1748 388888-0480 (800)275-8777 05/15/2020 02:45 PM -----------'-----'----'------------- Product 8ty Unit Price Price --------_--�� US Rog Bk>t/20 1 $11.00 $11.00 CTOM - Individual 2 $1.50 $3.00 Domowzio � Uncle Sams Hat 20 $0.15 $3.00 Cot-sage 88 $0.70 $25.20 CTOM - Individual - 2 $I.50 *3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3-00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1 58 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1,58 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.58 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $0.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.00 Oumamtio CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $2.00 Domestic CTOM - Indivtduu| - 2 $1.50 MOO Domoatio CTOM - Individual - 2 *1.50 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.00 Oum*nt|u CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3,UD Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 *1.50 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1,50 $3.00 Domestic DTOM'- Individual'- 2 $1.50 $3.80 Domestic CTOM - Individual 2 $1.50 $8.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 *1.50 $8.00 Qomnot(o CTOM - Individual - 2 *1.50 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual ' 2 $1.50 *8.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $%.UO Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.80 Dumamc1u CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.88 Dvmoyt|o OT8M - Individual - 1 $1.50 0.0U Domestic OT0H - Individual - 2 $1.50 $3.00 Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 *8.80 ' Domestic CTOM - Individual - 2 $1.50 *3.80 DmNoat1q ----- -------' --- - -'------ - --- --- ---- Total: $123.20 _______________________ ________________________ Debit Cord Rom/ ' $123.20 (Card Name:VISA) (Account #:XXXXXXXXXXXX6824) (Approval 4) (Transaction N:795) (Receipt 022026) Awo Nlrpff,4sm3�y�� 3, 2020 92— UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL SERVIC& mairing meter poSt8gG here. This Cerlifitcate of nrpqeaLed-to. USPSO for mailing. This forr Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: 7AMO-1310 AIVIANMA rk Here 3608 MIDDLE 50 UND-LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411- UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee. affix stamps or Ra- �id--S—TZ �E--R—VWE,4• Mailing meter pos"e hee- TiS Cerfficatc j Of Mailing DruviL des evidence that mail has peen presented 10 USPSO for mailing. This f,,— for dDmosfic and interuatjQrv' ! -mak Fron Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 77: i Postmark Here Tot ARMITAGE LUKE E CHRISTINA M,` 1.037 CLIFF RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affim SL=Ps OF POSTAL SERVICER • Mailing meter postage here. This Certificate of Malting provides presented m .2vidence that mail has been prese to USPS for mailing. This form From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, No th Carolina 28411 To; ATKINS FRANCES 104 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Postmark Hbre 6')7 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or POSTAL SERVICE. Mailing meter postage here, This CertificaLe of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing- From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: postmark Here BAILEY JOHN LEE MARY ELLEN 7100 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Ps Form 3817, April 2007I3t§M7aWi�P%R8R%rs - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 46 - - uN nWSMTEs POSTALSERVKEm soTef toe, p ste, w _ s _ -. Cer#�eate Qf 11�ailing rn812r Postage here. 7r Middlesound LLC rmaBing Tr Fr 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Te: 13AKE- K-W1L1:1A VI l J K ASIA Lt Y U " �oslmark Here 103 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of �-y EVS I SERVICE, MailliN To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to tJSPS@ for mailing. This form rnav_be used _Lnr domestic and intemaGonal mail. .�..� -. t......_,-. .......... ..... ... From: Middlesound LLC w- 5933 Runningbrook Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 f w Ta: BALKCT$ ANTN�NYr3 [Il- KAREff -MARIE -,t-ark Herfi'1# 7101 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 I (iFN OP 5 iISTE� 7o Pay Ha. a tl6 stamps or ��ILa1] SFR}IICEa- __na[fifir., —offI ftiiing rncter postage hem. Middlesound LLC sq= farnaq ?. 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: rS1i1 =W'1Nti I�iV�[UL7Y JC117I 1-ti 1$20 WILD WILLOW TR FORT WORTH, TX 761.34 PS Form 3817.. r . — ... — , _ _«ra ss UNITED sTA ES Certificate of To pay lee, affix stamps or © r p Maillitl meter possagahere. f" OSTAL SEI This Certificate of Mailing Pfovldes evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. _ This fomr may Sze used ter domestic apd.irgemalivnat mail- - - From: Middiesound 'LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Pastmark Here - Tm- BURTON EARL E ill CINDY 4005 GLEN ARBOR DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 13, 2020 PS Farm 3817. April @Gdp�iUa996luly ITEM: 7 - 12 - 47 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pa fee. affix stamps AN POSTZILSERVICE.a. meter y postage here- or This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to J5P5 formailing. This form may be used _ for domestic and intarnationaI mail. Frorr Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 N To: CAPUTO NICHOLAS A -usimarm Here 7109 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITEDS'rATES Certificate 0 To pay fee. affix stamps or Ju— POSTAL SERVIC& Mailin9f meter postage here- INS Gert[icafe of Mailing provides evidence that mail — has been Presented to USPSID for mailing. this to, --� sfiu aDd ifflemalional mail, From.- Middlesound LLC - 6933 Runningbrook Terrace W"MingtOn, North Carolina 28411 Tw CARRIER MATTHEW J ETAL -----)S`ffiark Here 7101 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 0 nt, ,i=!j ujvnwSWES POSTAt SERVICEm To pay foo. at& stamps or I!L j " MOW 01.p here. T—h;s Middlesound LLC 111F3 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilrnington, North Carolina 28411 LLAM1E)TU-UEK-PKUFtK I Y U KUU F LLL:.---, Postmark Hem- - 7204 ADONIS CT — WILMINGTON, NC 28405 P-& F-QM1 3817 JUUNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE; – Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to IJSPS@ for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail) Fr, Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: CORNELIUS ALEXANDRA M JORDAN% R 126 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 48 — 12047 A.- �-1 - n— MCKI 7��n n� f)nfl-Onr1r, To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage hem, , JR10, rqmarK Here J92- UNI TED SMTES Certificate Of 60—STAL �ERV�XEr Mailincl TO PaY u^afrox stamps or This Catificate of Mailing Provides evIdenc, that In all has be presented to USPSO 1w mai�mg. This form may t3a Used for domestic and intemationel ma�j_ en -- KVidd|esoundLLC 6g33 Run n ingbroo kTerroce --Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 'o: cRO'[[HME[QNAO1AmA-EL[ ,- pw�nark*ere/ MARGARET 24G BEDFORD RDVV __--__-_---- WILMINGTON, NC 28411 --- - UNITEDSTAM _---' --E`==`,--__ TO pay lea, affix stamps or T, k8�d�soundLLC ��:c� M*°w��.�� ° 8933Ronnin0bmookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina ZQ41l ' T. _______ocr��mu*ourrwvn�nn�c�*avmor�� -- �""� Z4IBEDRJRDRDVV -----WILMINGTON, NC2Q411 -----_- ��}-` Au— POSTAL SERVICE,7 To PUY fee, affix slamps or ThrS CerZfficatp of Mailing 13-videb evidence thaE Mail ha-.3 been preseme,, to USPS11 for maiii Wilmington, ~ --'^''a"" ~°--~-'- No�hCandhnaZ8411 To: ` D L� OUGSCYNTHL4 —atmark*°re 3613 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NCZ8411 —^ JuUNITEDSTATES Certificate Of 0 pay We. affix stamps or — POSTAL SERI�ICQ Mailing Tmeter postage here- ThIs f, -and intern atbnal m 0. 933 '-.....s"'uu^ Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 2841I `.' PoStMmm*°re ` ._ -._-...~,^`^'`''~''''^'^''''` SI8 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC2Q4lI ,��y13 2O2O pSrmm�M���z�r . UNITED STATES Certificate Of �QST-�dLSE�RVICf,, _M- �ilin To fi�e. afft St -metper ay postage OMPS Or here, This Certi5cate OfM341��Prcwdas evidence that mail has been presented to USPS"'D for Mailing- This fcr From: Middlesound LILC 6933 Runningbrock Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 KRIS -AIVP4--- -7 'astmark Here 402 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or JOPOSTAL SERVICE. Mailin g meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented 10 USPS(2) for mailing. This form may be used for domestic and intematronall mail. Frarrx Middlesound LLC Ibk ac �Wimington, North Carolina 28411 To: GIOIELLI JOSEPH C ETAL E?pstmark He 7100 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28405 --'W UNITED STATES 10 pay toe, error stamps Of RaPOSTAL meter postage hem Thi Middlesound LLC rmeNing Frf 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 HALL J-SLIJ I _T_ T., 214 SIMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Q 92UNITED STATES Certificate Of - pay fee' 17ps or POSTAL SERVICE-�, Mailing matter postage here� This Ceniricate.of,Marling pLoyides evidence that mail has bean presented to USPSOfor mailing This fore From: Middlesound LILC To. 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 FTALL -JLTHRFtL)VVAKL) - _-Postmark He4" 1105 LT. CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 S PS Fern, 3817, April 2007 PSN 7530-02-000-9065 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 50 n, pay fee, affix stamps ° ` meter postage here. TN* Certificate of klailing provides evidenve that mail has been presented to USPV� for mailing_ This form may be -used —' ', Midd1aooundLLC --_-----��''-----~ 6933RunninmbrookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 »" W1 LIVI I NGTO N, NC 28405 UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of ju— POSTAL SERVIC& Mailing rrieter postage h2le- To pay fee, affix stamps = This Certificate of Mailing provides evidenw- that ITIall has been presented to USPSO for mailing_ This form maybe used for domestic and international mail. From .,"°==s"=~ ^^C -------- '.''/ 6933RunninQbrookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina Z8412 ------- �^� FHEVV7CO[[EEN`` ----------- 7107OYSTERLN VV |LK8|NGTON,NC��4D5 ~ ree. aft 5lamps or '—.. ...~ ~ma ° nx/oo/eyuuno Lu- 6933Runnin0brookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 »" VV|[UAM ELAINE OHNSEN 2S4 BEDFORD RDVV WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ` ^` ��S Or CertificateOf Mailing moker postage hem, K4iddkmsoundLLC 8983RunningbrookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To '_--__-AAHNt$*KnAmq' -- —_—_--101PkC%VVAY[T WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Ps rorm 381 � o` Posrairk H" —�— � � - -~~ ^ Board of Commissioners , July 13.2O2O `^ UNITED STATES Certificate Of X2_ POSTAL SERVICE Wiling To papostage x stamps or meter hpm This Certificate Of Mailing PfMdPg evidence that Tai[ has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This fom— ' ' ' — __ _�j I . From: Middlesound LLC — 6933 Run ni rigbroo k Terrace — Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 ---------- KAISER CALVIN E DONNA H nst_rrrarlk Here To-. 118 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 L ZN ""'TWST VO� FA L SO _rCE. Certificate of Mail T- Wy fee, a V.. rkmps or Thr— m86orpmtagaiiem. Fn Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 7.: Hera KE LEEHL K _PAf KICIA-L ffRS S35 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817 certif icateof To pay fee affix stamps Ur 'a. Maiiln mete, postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USpSO for malfing. This form maybe used ter domestic and international mail. Fro Middlesound LLC 6933 Ru n ningb rook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: NLLLT 51 tVhN-BLPjt I R-NICUEE IVIAKT Postmark Here 342 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of —10 Pay fee. affix stamps or " 'L' Mailing meter postage here- V_&S _TAd -L.SE SERVICE., I C E R j na�lj bas been presented I USPS('"Or rna"'flg ............ This certik �t& Mailing PTv1cL-_cL4,en� V/ Fro- Middlesound LLC 6933 Ru n n ingbroo k Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 4( KING T RUBY M 122 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 29405 ---------- ITEM PsF,rrn3817, p,il200-P"A1pt�QMr0%%RW*rs 12 -July 13, 2020 : 7 - - 52 ANUNITED STATES Certificate of POSTAL SERVICE" Mailing To fly fee, affix clamps or meter postage here. This This f, F1.M Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace -Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LAMB JAMES M KAYE D 7104 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 i UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee. affix stamps or POS TA L SER VICEF Mailing meter poSlage hem. This Certificate at Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPV�far Mailing. This form may be 5�� _!L d for domostip and intemarional mail, . From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LAM DKEY 111YUIR)Ej 15ARKy "ost6ark Here 403 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007'P'si0(WBb]oi6omgk6ioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 53 To; KITT SIMEON A TIARA ATid_NS`_'___'F`0iilMark HereJ 102 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LINT TEDSTATES_ Certificate Of POS M L SERVICE] Mailing TO Pay fee. affix stamps or rnt., postage he-- This Cortilicate of Mailing provides evidence that Mai has b-an presented to USPSe for Mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international .1l_ From Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 77 1 -"Postmark Here j�j To; LAURA N -1 JAY MItHAEL KRANCH 7112 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITED STATES Certificate Of POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for Mailing. This form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: Middlesound LLC rx 6933 R u n n i ngb rook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LAMB JAMES M KAYE D 7104 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 i UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee. affix stamps or POS TA L SER VICEF Mailing meter poSlage hem. This Certificate at Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPV�far Mailing. This form may be 5�� _!L d for domostip and intemarional mail, . From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: LAM DKEY 111YUIR)Ej 15ARKy "ost6ark Here 403 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007'P'si0(WBb]oi6omgk6ioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 53 UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of To pay m* affix stamps or ThIs CertiVicate of Mailing provides evidence that Mail has been presented to US PSO for mailifla- Tlhis form may be used for domestic and international mail. --- xnmo/exounoLLC ---- '-`.^-` G933Runn| Terrace VN| No�hCarolina Z84ll --- � \ ` »" LA8�l]N KEITH N SHERRY E 71U8 OYSTER UN WILMINGTON, NC28411 _ --' POSTALSERVICEo Certificate Of Mailing � *m c' ' 6933Runn|n0brookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: ii�s5rtxu1K,nm/r VV- //--- --------334LOCKERBYLN -------WILMINGTON, NC2O41l UNITEDSTATES Certificate Of REIM POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing This Cartifloate of Mailing provides eviderice that mail ha 5 been presented to USPSO for mailing This form n. To; GD33RunninmbrookTerrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 - ' WILMINGTON, NC 28411 To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. Postmark Here - r . JUPOSTI-IL SERILICE, Maillinn ne,,Postaga here. This Certificate of Mailirg Provides evidence that mail has been pra�-rited to USPSO foe malling. 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners ' July 13.2O2O ---'-4[GM:7 12 `54- __- AQUIVITE®STATES POSLALSERVT "'Pay ne, area stamps & Certificate of Mailing . rnolerpostaga here. This Middlesound LLi. From 5933 Runningbrook Terrace - - Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Tug MiUUU::> 7U NL7 LU- Postmark Here 5933 RUNNINGBROOK TER WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITED STATES Certificate Of To POSTAL J EE- Ei, fYra i ll i n meter postage here- or � I This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence Iivet mail has been presented to UsPse for mailing. This fa= rnau..he irsed For domesliC -anj:j€tteM,@tionaf mail. From Middlesound LLC _ -_ ._ -_ 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 ro: K4JDDLES0UNU- LLC - -- - - -- - 6933 RUNNINGBROOK TER WILMINGTON, NC 28411 POSTAL UNITED STATES Certificate Of To POSTAL SERVICE, _ Mailing meter stamps or postage here. This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence That mail has been presented to USPSO for mailingr: This fortti- lay. he-nsed fnr dnme_ctic and. int —tio l-mmiL . _ _..... _ ._ ._ _ _._.. •- s'"•y: -„ From Middlesound LLC""``'` 6933 Runningbrook Terrace _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 r To - MILIARD ANIV -C Postmark Here 407 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 �UNITED STATES Certificate Of ADSTi1L SERVICEl,. Mailing This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSA�7 for mailing 'rhis form may be used for domestic and international mail. From: _.._ . To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here. Middiesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 29411 To: MORY EDNA H JAVIER F 7105 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2ao7 PSN36q @tQ)T-0Z9*Y§§sioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 12 - 55 C UNITED STATES Certificate 01 Ma ng This Cerlirwple of MailiT provides evidence that mail has been Presented to USPSO for mailing. Fror 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 21,8411 TO PRY fee. affix stamps or meter postage here. ------rr ` ' ---^`'~~~~^'E L^=.~°o :' ^ Postmark Here ' . ` 130 BRANDYVVNE[]RVV WILMINGTON, NC204OS - -~- UNITED STATES Certificate jap-os Mailing Of To pay fee, affix stamps ° meter postag here This C erfificate of M ading: provides "idenve that mail ha5 been presented to LJSPSil for mail ing- r~�K4iddi�ooundLLC ' 6933Runn|nQb rook Terrace 'Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 29412 - '-------- - '�\ / UNITED STATES To or tc;r mailing MkdlesoundUI 6933RunninBbrookTerrace ---' Wilmington, North Carolina %8411 ` _pq*=��A�" To _---__-pwnN�t/om pc�Ls�/on''-- LEWIS LOOP RD SE -------~~-- BOLIVIA, � ~ �! -------_ . ` ^ Pa Form 8817, 2 -Bhvantnf Commissioners �,ly13.2CF20}~--- ITEM:7 12 56 '^ M-pa-M POSTAL SERVICE, Mailing ° met,, Postage hore- This Ceffilicate of Folailing provides evidenca that rnail has been presenWd to USPS9 for mailing, This form may be used for damozAic and internrlionaf mail- 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To., EDUCATIU-N- 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 UNITED STATES Certificate jap-os Mailing Of To pay fee, affix stamps ° meter postag here This C erfificate of M ading: provides "idenve that mail ha5 been presented to LJSPSil for mail ing- r~�K4iddi�ooundLLC ' 6933Runn|nQb rook Terrace 'Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 29412 - '-------- - '�\ / UNITED STATES To or tc;r mailing MkdlesoundUI 6933RunninBbrookTerrace ---' Wilmington, North Carolina %8411 ` _pq*=��A�" To _---__-pwnN�t/om pc�Ls�/on''-- LEWIS LOOP RD SE -------~~-- BOLIVIA, � ~ �! -------_ . ` ^ Pa Form 8817, 2 -Bhvantnf Commissioners �,ly13.2CF20}~--- ITEM:7 12 56 '^ MUgUNITED STATES MW POSTAL S�VICEe To pay fee. atr- stamps or - -_ - C -erficate- OfMaring metM'po?ta" here. Middlesound LLC Al forma,�ng. 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: i-"R1NC.E- TUPTPLACE HOA 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE BOLIVIA, NC 28422 UIVITED STATES Certificate Of POST13L S,I=R Mailing To pay fee, affix stamps or meter postage here - This CerliFrcate of Fd.aii'tnc, rovides evidence ,hal mail. has been presented Ee USPS4 for rnailing- This fr r From: Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 -- To: PRINTY DONAL.i7 — -- 7432 NAUTICA YACHT CLUB DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 imUNIT,ED'STAT,ES Certificate of i�QSTAi. S,ERI/ICEF,. Mailing This Cerlificale of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to LISPS® For maiiing. This form —maybe used for domestoc and interna_ Gonaf mail. From Middlesound LLC - - -- -- -.- 6933 Runningbrook "Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: ROGER BARBIE 100 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KUNITEDSTATES Certificate Of POSTAL C - Mailin This Certificate of MaRing provides evidence that mail has O This form Len presented to SPSO for mailing— From: Middlesound LLC - - - - - - -- - -- - tmark Here,' To pay fee. affix stamps or meter postage here- to PaY'fee. affix stamps or meter postage here- 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 2.8411 To: SBOTI KAREiU L 3601 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, April 2007 PSN 020 M:7 -12 -57 UNITE©STATF-S POSTAL SERVICE o Certificate Of Mailing mroprposostt afirestampsor ater page here. This Ce:ufit<:te- eL "Sr: &irta nr:nncus evioLL 7ha[ o ;al ha=,h en press.ntsxf to [ASp$try f umacinSi. ins Fro. Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace w Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 7nr Postmark Hare . SHIVPiKU ENN E TIFFAiVY W _ 404 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 PS Form 3817, A UNITED STATES To pay tae, aflu stump= u Aro D dL5ERYlCE� Certificate Of Mailin me[erpoAage here. Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace -- Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Postmark Here �111i1 rFi tIAINUALL T HERtZ)/A 4132 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 f,JdNI ! ED STAi ES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or O—Sr A r CEa�Y ICES. meter postage here. This Certif7C8te of Mailing provides - evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This `` Middlesound LLC - 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 _ stMark Here TO: TAYLOR STEPHEN J C'HARLENE K 2029 EASTWOOD RD APT 144.. WILMINGTON, NC 28403 -- UNITED EV STATES C rt if i mate Of To pay fee, affix stamps or T1�L ERVI C M al l i i1 meter postage here. SE�� ._.� —.� This Certificate of Mailing provides evidence [hat marl has been presented to USPSO for mailing _ This fun may 6e used for-domestic qnd irtternatiQPal Mail.. 5- Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace; Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 —. stmaric Hfrei'w TO: 3618 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP K0 WILMINGTON, NC 28411° 3 ` rs -� u y , 2020 PS Form 3$17, April 2007 PSN 753i1 -- : 7 - 12 - 58 UNITEDSTATES {.�L$ERVFCE® a To pay tae, afAx stamps or aPOSTALSERVICEdh Certificate Of Mailin meter pcslago rpem. Tros Ceffmeie-oEyaftm mall iiLK L.een prpwzj-�o to 0-.Ptfcr rRading T'. FrI Middlesound LLC 5933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 7- T., Postmark Hara R ffKN-tW5TUAK1 M-A" W 338 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 UNITED STATES Certificate Of AOPOSTAL SERVJCE�, Mailing here. or This CRnifiCate of Mailing provides evidence that mail has been presented to USPSO for mailing. This tom n� tlpU[ ed for jioUkeEi jG_an(li[lWfnatior.iai mail, ----.. From; Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To! WES ME K- K-A FKJ IV �-*6stmark Here 406 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 2841-1 JO--' UNITED STATES Certificate Of To pay fee, affix stamps Of j50—STALSERVICE, Mailing meter postage, here. This Certificate of Mailtrig provides evidence that mail has been presented to U5P5@ for mailing" This ---ii.rar-domestic and international mail. Fror Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: . ...... Postmark Here:.,.: W;LKERSON G ALLEN ETAL 3605 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 J, UNITM STATES To pay fea. alpOarps or P 0= SER VXE o Certificate Of Mai I i ng Middlesound LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 To: Y tLLt (YARKY -E ME 346 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Ps Form 3817:AoFh 2ubf-M-75su-u2-uREMD 7 - 12 - 59 . F 9 5 -28 -20 MEMORANDUM TO: New Hanover County Planning Department RE: Middlesound LLC "Demarest Pointe" 3 -30 -20 Notice-For Information Communications and Meetings with Adjacent Residents and Interested Public 4 -9 -20 through 4 -30 -20 5 -15 -20 Second Notice For Information 5 -28 -20 Community Meeting; Peace Baptist Church; 320 Military Cutoff Road; Wilmington, NC FROM: Scott D Stewart Middlesound LLC, Member /Manager The 3 -30 -20 Notice For Information generated five on -site meetings, nine email communications generating two letters of support. The on site meetings provided a one hour tour of the development program on the property with the four adjacent property owners on Pickway Court and a property owner across the street in the Princeton Place Neighborhood. Requested clarifications included entrance drive location, exit drive location, position and height of the proposed buildings, stormwater and traffic. Upon physically and visually walking the entire program, with each resident separately, over a three week period, all residents attending were satisfied the proposed program provided well designed traffic management minimizing the impacts to Middlesound Loop Road ingress and egress; provided adequate onsite parking; the building locations with adequate setbacks from existing homes; welcomed the attention to preserving the majority of the trees; providing a stormwater program to address a minimum 100 year storm event; the proposed Demarest Pointe Association will maintain all fencing, buffers and stormwater programs. Commitment to minimize head light glare through landscaping; minimize street lighting with direct downward light patterns. In general, after explaining the program on site, all residents toured were satisfied the high level of detail and thought incorporated into the development plan addressed their clarifications and concerns. The 3 -30 -20 Notice for Information generated nine email communications. Three of the nine email communications provided statements without the opportunity to explain the design, achievements of the design program or even engage in the first effort to engage in a dialogue which included : "trying to squeeze in the maximum density as the focal point to our loop entrance is a bit on the selfish /greedy side"; "Your methods of overbuilding is destroying our town"; irresponsible of the committee an indicative of what can only be unscrupulous intent by the developer . The remaining six email were exchanges mostly with Bob Parr only discussing the applications process requiring "to have a virtual meeting ..... to negotiate to reduce density "; a county resident suggestion to apply the EZDZ zoning as an overlay; two letters of support "In favor of the rezoning ". All communications have been forwarded to Brad Schuler for the record. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 13 - 1 The 5 -28 -20 Second Notice of Information provided for a Community Meeting which was attended by twelve (12) residents, one recently moved to Middle Sound in 2016, two moved to Middle Sound in 2004 and the remaining have lived in Middle Sound since the 1980's. Discussion topics included zoning, traffic, stormwater, density. After explaining the traffic and stormwater exhibits in detail, several of the residents who recently moved to Middle Sound appeared satisfied their clarifications and concerns were addressed. Of the remaining residents who have resided in Middle Sound since the 1980's, one supported the rezoning and the others questioned the technical representations of the applications stormwater and traffic assessments and commenced discussions requiring to negotiate the applications zoning request and conditions to include restrictive pedestrian access signs; performance bonds and to build single family homes with full movement driveways on Middle Sound Loop Road. An adjacent neighbor requested to limit the amount of trees to be removed, a possible fence to limit headlight glare at night at the entrance and offered to meet on site to review the setbacks of the proposed Demarest Pointe residences with their home that provides a setback buffer of 222' due transition from a one story home to the 35' Demarest Pointe residence. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -13-2 Middlesound LLC Name (please print) 1 ` Demarest Pointe Signature r1 I 5 -28 -20 Community Meeting Address Phone # Sign In Sheet Email _9 -Yr ) 5; _10 12 13 rl � <0 m l �M.Q;� • com a96 qft y �Drn u to tCoCiQ A rD G� 1'Gi 6 z J��( 15 16 Board of Commissioners July 13., 2Q20 - ITEM: 7 - 13 - 3 REPORT FROM 6 -30 -20 COMMUNITY MEETING INSPIRED BY 6 -4 -20 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MEETING COMMENTS NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT REZONING REQUEST CASE Z20 -09 To: Department of Planning & Land Use Re: Middlesound LLC - Demarest Pointe Location: 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Road Proposed Zoning: R -5 (Residential Moderate -High Density District (attached) The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice (invitation for a community meeting on the above rezoning application was given to the adjacent owners set forth on the attached list via US mail, certificate of mailing on Jane 20, 2020. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, June 30, 2020: 6:00 PM — 8:00 PM at the Peace Baptist Church. 320 Military Cutoff Road, Wilmington, NC 28405 The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Please see attached Sign -in Sheet. In addition to the quests, the following development team representatives were present: Scott Stewart (Middlesound LLC, Demarest Company Landscape Architects; Dave Spetrino (PBC Design + Build) In summary of the 6 -30 -20 community meeting, team members felt there was a pre - determined position from some of the guests attending. The team assumed their preconceived positions were derived from the misinformation being disseminated to the Middle Soured Community ensued after the first 5 -28 -20 community meeting that was attended by Bob Parr of Middle Sound Look Out. Middle Sound Look Out, apparently, is a Middle Sound Community activist group originated in the 1980's by three Middle Sound Community individuals. In an effort to correct the misinformation, the team exchanged questions from the guests concerning their opinions based on of what they understood and their position on a myriad of concerns they exclaimed the Demarest Pointe application represented and the alleged impacts to the Middle Sound Community which included: "the NCDOT traffic assessment and Davenport testimony at the 6 -4 -20 Planning Board hearing is not realistic (Sboto); there will be 72 cars trying to exit onto Middle Sound Loop Road in the AM peak hour from Demarest Pointe (C. Baldwin); Demarest Pointe will attract familys with dozens of children overcrowding Ogden Elementary School (Rogers); unsafe traffic in the morning drop off at Ogden Elementary School interfering with bus traffic (H.Depew); the round -a -bout is a traffic choke pointe (B. Baldwin); the traffic from Demarest Pointe would cause more accidents and fatalities (B,Baldwin), Demarest Pointe residents will not use right - in, right -out movements (Rogers); will flood Pickway Court and Queens Pointe (Andre); degrade the water quality of Pages Creek (Murphy); provides no guarantee to the protection of trees being preserved (Deffenbaugh); the building heights were not compatible with the current zoning and neighborhood (T.Depew); three story towers would compromise the safety for the children of the Ogden Elementary School due to the direct view from the questionable motives of potential Demarest Pointe Residents from three story porches to the Ogden Elementary Schools children's playground (H. Depew); there are snipers on the roof tops in Charlotte and it is coming here (T.Depew), anything is possible today B.Baldwin) ". Notice was provided to the fifty -three (53) adjacent property owners ten (10) days in advance of the Community Meeting. Since Middlesound LLC does not engage in social media, it was brought to the attention that Middle Sound Look Out campaigned on social media (Face Book, Next Door, Middles Sound Look Out, In the Loop) to attend the Community Meeting and organized a fund drive at Ogden Elementary Scholl at the round -a -bout June 27th and 28th notifying the Community of the 6 -30 -20 Community Meeting. Residents desiring to attend the 6 -30 -20 Community Meeting were requested to email middlesoundllc @yahcjo,co r, or contact directly Scott Stewart at 910 -231 -2428 to request to attend since there may be gathering restrictions should the Governor require Phase 2 restrictions to continue. The Phase 2 restrictions were extended on June 24, 2020, four days after the 6 -20 -20 notice was mailed. Due to the size of the Peace Baptist Church room accommodations, could accommodate up to 50 guests over a two hour meeting period and would be extended due to the response from the notice. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 1 A total of nineteen (19) response requests to attend the 6-30-20 Community Meeting were received. One reservation through G1D'231-2428 and eighteen (18)through The team held the opportunity to reserve &J attend through 12:OOPM 6-29-20SOwe could schedule meeting tiC?9Sdepending OOthe amount 8fguests requiring to attend since our maximum limitation for the room at Peace Baptist Church was estimated at 50 guests. Depending VDthe response, the amount Ofguests would have t0b8 organized k} five separate groups and the time allocated to the meeting would have tobe modified should fifty (5O) guests respond tOattend. Since only nineteen (1Q) responses were received, the meeting could be scheduled between 6:00 PM and &00 PM in three sessions, organized in the sequence of received responses Schedules were sent to all responders before 9:00 AM on 6-30-20 providing attendance schedules, Three guest responses cancelled the day Ofthe Community Meeting arriving at the total Of sixteen /16\ guests would attend. D( the 10 guests b> attend, the guests attending from the neighbors list 0f53 property owners within 5O0 feet provided b8 Niidd|eaounULLC from the Department of Planning and Land Use were: Two /2\ families (five individuals) from the adjacent Pickway Court attended, One (1) family (two individuals) from a owners on Middle Sound Loop Road attended. A total of three (3) noticed neighbors, Of the 16 guests to attend, the guests attending from the Community and Wilmington through social media information vw*ne� Ten (18) other residents attend ing from the eastern pOrt|onof the Middle Sou Dd Loop C0nDmunityand one (1) resident of Wilmington (Buck O'Gh1e1ds. past County CVn0m|aoiuner) who had an interest in DnmareSt Pointe since he resided In the Middle Sound Community for 27 years and knew most ofthe guests attending from the eastern portion of the Middle Sound loop Comm unih/ A total of sixteen (16) g uests attended the 6-30-20 Community Meeting between 6: 00 PM aOd& 00 PM and two (2) tmammenObers. Dr. Rudy Shepard, Pastor of Peace Baptist Church was also in attendance from 7:30 PM to 8:30 PM. The team provided factual corrections to the questions and opinions from the guests, The team answered all guests' questions during the meeting and the team referenced the provided application exhibits displayed at the Community Meeting, regarding: I I ZT.3 9 9 10 Demarest Pointe traffiovolume was realized bv the required guidance o[ the Institute 0f Transportation UTE\ Trip Generation Manual, The O8Dl8Re3 Pointe program produces only 12 trips iO the AM Peak Hour and 18 trips iO the PM Peak hour. ATraffic Impact Analysis (T|/A is only required for development proposals generating more than 100 peak hour trips. The De08[est Pointe traffic evaluation was reviewed bvNCDCTnn Exhibits 13&14 and confirmed the ITE assessment nf3 trips entering -8 trips exiting, am and 10 trips eniahng -8trips eX|MDg. pm |n accordance with the required compliance k] [nuhtuteof Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. NCDOT Comments also expressed: "The Demarest Pointe access design provides excellent access management with limited movement right-in and right-out driveways instead of traditional full movement intersections, The roundabout provides a nearby intersection for vehicular site traffic to make u-turn type movements to accommodate left-in and left-out movements related to the development site. NCOOT does not have any concerns related ho the development exit access relative \O the school driveways. In general, the development design is well thought out in regard to circulation and flow of traffic". The team mentioned for those that were familiar with the 6-4-20 Planning Board meeting, although not necessary, Midd|esQUOdLLC8OQ8g8dD8VeO port 8s8traffic cVnsuI\2Ot t8indepenVenUy assess the |TE manual determination and the NGDOT assessment. The Davenport representative, Robert Gey, confirmed under oath at testimony at the Planning Board puNichnahngtheITEnlanua|and1heNCDQToomeSsn1eOtvvasoorn8(jand1heOamommtPV(n\atra0hch8s anegUg|bla effect on Middle Sound Loop Road traffic. The entrance and exit locations were well thought out and provided safe vmhicu\ar movements from and onto Middle Sound Loop Road. Since the Planning Board comments and members of the Community expressed concern regarding the construction traffic forD8manost Pointe, the team agreed to restrict construction traffic actvity to and from the development during the AM peak hours of Ogden Elementary School's calendar year and school events- Board ofCommisoionrs July 13.2020 ITEM: 7 -14-2 The right -in and right -out is the safest traffic pattern for this location and property minimizing accidents. Should an accident occur, it would be minor in contrast to left hand turning movements from the property which would increase the potential for accidents to 72% higher rate of occurrence. The right -in and right -out entrance and exist will be well defined, constructed and marked in accordance with all jurisdictional agencies to prohibit vehicle entering and exiting the wrong way from Demarest Pointe. A deceleration lane to the entrance is not required, however, the team will revisit this comment from one of the guests with Davenport Traffic Engineers and NCDOT. DEMAREST POINTE PROJECTED RESIDENT DEMOGRAPHICS The team explained the Demarest Pointe Townhomes are vertical living, explaining these homes are only 16' wide, the first floor is a one car garage and a bedroom/office option with living, dinning, kitchen on the second floor and two bedrooms on the third floor. This type of living arrangements is attractive to single individuals (mostly women) either young professional or retired; young couples without children; couples just married without children, retired couple or single individual downsizing their living arrangements for a maintenance free neighborhood or older adults of a family (Grandparents (single or couple )} that are used to stairs, have grown children living in Middlesound or the surrounding community that could choose to live close to Ogden Elementary, walk to pick up their Grandchildren after school. As referenced in the Department of Planning and Land use Staff Report, the team agrees, the estimate of only 2 elementary school children may be living in the Demarest Pointe neighborhood. FLOODING AND WATER QUALITY The team referenced the Exhibit 4 "Flood Map" and Exhibit 17 " Stormwater Plan" demonstrating the Demarest Pointe is not in a flood zone and that the existing flooding that is occurring in Middle Sound is within the 100 year flood zone of the Pages Creek Watershed where hundreds of homes have been built at very low elevations and has been confirmed that Parliament Drive and Bedford Drive is at elevation +6 whereas the flood elevation is at elevation +13. These homes will always flood since they were built in the flood zone, Demarest Pointe is not causing the flooding. The team referenced Exhibit 17 explaining this application is doing it's part by not adhering to the standard 25 -year storm event which required to manage 8" inch rain in 24 hours. Demarest Pointe will manage, at a minimum, a 500 -year storm event which will manage 18" of rain in a 24 hour period and we are exploring during final design to manage a 1,000 year storm event of 21.1 inches of rain in a 24 hour period. This fact protects the homes on Pickway Court and the homes downstream since the imperious coverage generated from the Demarest Pointe design of 24 residences in 6 buildings will be managed on site during these events. The major difference is 6 single family homes in the present R -20 zoning will generate approximately the same amount of impervious coverage as the Demarest Pointe design program but in an R -20 land plan pattern. Only a 25 -year storm would be required in the existing R -20 zone. All stormwater not managed on site beyond the 25 year event, or 8" of rain in a 24 hour period, would leave the site contributing to the stormwater volumes downstream. The team mentioned although not required to manage water quality, Demarest Pointe will be managing stormwater to the level of SA water standards to increase the quality of the water being managed on site, protecting and increasing the water quality on site and the Pages Creek Watershed. TOWNHOME BUILDING HEIGHT The team referenced to the quests Exhibit 11 "Residence Definition" and provided the reality of the R -5 zoning provides a regulated building height of 35' in accordance with the New Hanover County building code and is consistent with the 35' building height requirement throughout Middles Sound Loop Community. There are hundreds of homes that are 35' in height, three stories with roof peaks 40 -45' in height, Demarest. Pointe is consistent with the character of Middle Sound Architecture. The difference, Demarest Pointe building size and mass that accommodates four residences is equal to the size and mass of just one single family home that are located throughout the Middle Sound Community. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -14-3 As with every neighborhood or homesite built upon, adjustments need to be made to build a home on land and requires grading the homesite to ensure stormwater travels away from the home. Every homesite built requires this method and can change the grade elevating the existing grade or cutting into the existing grade several feet before constructing a residence. In the case of Demarest Pointe, the building area for four (4) townhomes residences (one building 52' x 64') is very similar in size to one single family home. Since it has been elected to save trees and use Low Impact Development Techniques (LID), the building site areas will be slightly elevated using the dirt excavated from the stormwater management program. This technique minimizes the requirement to truck fill into the site and "balance" the site improvement program with the existing available materials on the development site. Careful attention to the sites grading will minimize the impact on the trees envisioned to be preserved. This process is expected to raise the grade where the Townhomes residences are located approximately 1.5' — 2' before constructing the Townhome residence building which will comply to the 35' building code. This is the same technique practiced when building Demarest Landing and Demarest Village. In total, it is projected the 35' building height, by code, is measured to the mean elevation of the townhome residence roof gable. The townhome height to the roof peak is projected to be 38 -39 feet from the existing prepared grade to ensure a flat building site and to ensure stormwater runs away from the building. All together the projected building height from the existing grade, with 1.5' — 2' of fill, together with the 35' building code height and then measured to the projected roof peak, totals approximately 395 — 41' total height. This is a customary expectation in all two- and three -story homes in the Middle Sound Community. The adjacent home on Pickway Court owned by the Kitts is a two story, 4,400 sq. ft. home with a building footprint of 2,400 sq.ft. (Demarest Pointe is 3,300 sq. ft. for 4 residences). The mitts building height to the roof peak is approximately 30' and hidden behind the existing 20112 tree spaded buffer that now exceeds 40' high. The guests were concerned with the height of the two story and three -story porches. The team explained the second story deck would be at approximately 12' above grade, viewing for sitting would be approximately 16' above grade and viewing for standing would be approximately 18' above grade. This viewing elevation is very similar to two story homes. The third -floor deck is approximately 23' above grade, viewing for sitting would be approximately 25' above grade and viewing for standing would be approximately 27' above grade. Due to the efforts through land planning and preservation, the entire surrounding mature forested buffer that enjoys 45' to 60' trees will considerably create a filtered or opaque buffer from these aforementioned viewing opportunities for Demarest Park Residents viewing the forested landscape within and surrounding the Demarest Park neighborhood, TREE PRESERVATION The team referenced Exhibit 21 "Fencing and Buffering Plan" which provides a graphic representation of the perimeter buffer to be preserved and further enhanced with additional landscaping after construction to provide thicken up the opacity of the existing buffer. The landscape buffer and landscape planting will be part of the continual maintenance program of the Demarest Pointe Association to maintain and be required to preserve. The team has considered relocating the four guest parking spaces at the corner and providing a vest pocket park as an entry statement adjacent to the round -a -bout. SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY The team explained the vision and opportunity to connect to the Pickway Court Neighborhood, which Middlesound LLC approached all adjacent residents with separate, individual on site meetings during January through early March this year and agreed with the location and concept. However, one Pickway Court family insisted the Pickway Court neighbors do not want a sidewalk connection to Demarest Pointe. The team agreed to verify the opinion expressed by the one family at the Community Meeting (Rogers) with the other families on Pickway Court and the opinion of the Department of Planning and Land Use before removing this opportunity for a sidewalk connection. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -14-4 R -20 TO R -5 ZONING The team explained when the land was purchased in 2044 the existing zoning was R -20 that was established in 1987. It was reaffirmed this was explained in the application and acknowledged there have been significant changes to New Hanover County as well as Middle Sound Community over the past 32 years making R -20 and R -15 zoning obsolete. In 1987 Middle Sound had only one ingress and egress out to Market Street, traffic control was limited to one stop sign, no connectivity, no sewer, lots were required to be larger to accommodate individual septic tanks and wells. Water was either through a neighborhood collection well system or individual wells for each property that could be accommodated in R -15, 15,000 sq. ft. lots or R -20, 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Fire protection had limited sources from available community water collection system or fire department water trucks. The team referenced these points to the guests to again revisit the application, this was all explained in the application that has been available since the first week of April. Most importantly, since the 'Unified Development Ordinance and the Comprehensive Flan has been adopted to guide New Hanover County in the next chapter of growth, we've been experiencing for the past 15 years. These tools, the new zoning codes, provide the opportunity for new alternate zoning types to provided additional housing opportunities as New Hanover County thickens through the surge in population growth we are experiencing. The tools provided the opportunity for Demarest Pointe to set an example for tree preservation, water quality, stormwater design, traffic safety and provide diversity in housing opportunities for the County. Additional reasons why R -20 is or R -15 is no longer appropriate were detailed in the Demarest Pointe Application including: 1995 — 2000: Middle Sound Loop Road Connectivity: Red Cedar Road to CoviI Farm Road to Military Cutoff; Kenmore Street to Brandywine Circle To Tree Swallow Lane (Gated- Emergency )to fled Cedar Road To Covil Farm Road to Military Cutoff; Carden Road to Wendover Lane To Market Street; Oyster Lane to Wendover Lane To Market Street; 2005 *: Middlesound Loop Road Widening with a bike lanes from Ogden Elementary to Harlendale Drive, 2006 *: New Ogden Elementary School Facility built with vehicular circulation ,patterns for ingress and egress; 2007 *: County Sewer Installed; 2010`: Middle Sound Loop /Darden Read Round -A -Bout installed to mitigate traffic patterns; 2012*: Multiuse Path installed from Red Cedar Road to Ogden Elementary to Oyster Lane at Emerald Forest; 2017 *: Sidewalk Improvements from Ogden Elementary to Kenmore Street at the Brandywine Neighborhood (* Improvements are all immediately accessible, adjacent to and service the Demarest Pointe neighborhood) The team further explained existing zoning does not provide: for tree retention or preservation of the existing perimeter buffer of the 3.35 acre subject property; does not provide to limit ingress/egress for vehicular access, particularly left hand movements from and onto Middle Sound Loop Road to the subject site; the existing zoning promotes individual, full service driveway creating tragic hazard crash increases, especially at this location and the minimum standard for a stormwater runoff is a 25 year storm. As a result of the Community Meeting, the following considerations will be addressed on or before the Commissioners Meeting: The team has considered to restrict construction traffic activity to and from the development during the AM peak hours of Ogden Elementary School's calendar year and school events. The team has considered relocating the four guest paving spaces at the comer and providing a vest pocket park as an entry statement adjacent to the round -a -gout. The team would revisit the request to reconfirm with Davenport Traffic Engineers or NCDOT that a deceleration lane is not required at the entrance. The team agreed to verify the opinion expressed by the one family at the Community Meeting (Rogers) with the other families on Pickway Court and the opinion of the Department of planning and land Use before removing this opportunity for a sidewalk connection. Respectful lyyy jbmitte�l, :� ,�ritt D. Std4art RLA ASLA Middlesound LLC Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -14-5 3.2.11. RESIDENTIAL MODERATE -HIGH DENSITY (R -5) DISTRICT A. Purpose The purpose of the Residential Moderate -High Density (R -5) District is to provide lands that accommodate moderate to high density residential development on smaller lots with a compact and walkable development pattern. The R -5 district allows a range of housing types and can be developed in conjunction with a non - residential district to create a vertical mixed -use development pattern as well as serve as a transition between mixed -use or commercial development and low to moderate density residential development. S. Concept .aF' C. Use Standards Allowed uses and use - specific standards for principal, accessary, and temporary uses are established in Article 4,- Uses and Use - Specific Standards. D. District Dimensional Standards Standard Single Family Detached Duplex Triplex Quadraplex Lot area, minimum (square feet)* 5,000 7,500 12,500 17,500 1 Lot width, minimum (feet)* 50 2 Front setback (feet)* 20 3 Side setback, street (feet)* 10.5 4 Side setback, interior (feet)* a 5 Rear setback (feet)* 15 Density, maximum (dwelling unitsfacre)*" 8 Building height, maximum (feet) 35 Does not apply to Performance Residential 'Developments (see Section 3.13 -D). Apples only to Performance Residential Developments (see Section 3.1.3 -D). 3 -32 New Hanover County, NC I Unified Development Ordinance Board of Commissioners - July 13 ITEM: 7 -14-7 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -14-8 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -14-9 n, 0. - 1,A- n—Oldghband d � ; f- LWOMAP 4N Gbp S M M� wuiu.u. QESICN 6UIL0 RESIDENCE 1 J RESIDENCE 2 RESIDENCE 3 RESIDENCE 4 f - ' -f { r Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 10 3 A sft ;med� RealLLerhneE M pBC I baud ie LL- 1111 q�sioew�c�oecrr+maH �� 11 Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual Estimated Humber Of Trips Generated Traffic Impart -A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) IAust Be Completed For All Proposed Developments That Genereate blare Than 100 Peak Hour Trips Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 11 fl- A chmk Awt- Ik HarAcK w�..eya�9r� 'rwWa. a xPBC I ogsl4N Sr 9CJ 140 rrewv.p�rwc AM Peak eak Land Use Type FFE Wze Unit Adj /Cen Rate Eq Volumes Hour Trips Trips s Enter E xit jHDur Exit Multifamily Housing (!ow -Rise) [Data Range:0. 0% lling 5W] Residentlal 220 24 units Adjacent % 141 6 Traffic Impart -A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) IAust Be Completed For All Proposed Developments That Genereate blare Than 100 Peak Hour Trips Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 11 fl- A chmk Awt- Ik HarAcK w�..eya�9r� 'rwWa. a xPBC I ogsl4N Sr 9CJ 140 rrewv.p�rwc VFiMCnI -4R CIRGIILATION r Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 12 d 7!•1 k.V ?Lti E P� 11 ii l 9 A (fnada ANMI[411 Mef�iloa5oad s.,hra•ew..x�anan..•aw airs �r� s...sr.naw. �a._x...r LAND AREA swung 4.47AC.RES � 8E"fBAGK P'LAH y�• �$ 5 :t { S �R� m•0. 15 k N h M1 _ a d ��d �F .r A Y `'� f+�r..'. `fi � • � +) �S '� #. •.�z C JJ.4� Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 13 +h; Ihit AkLS ]IoINIT. b s luedtM N er o0 LD CIRCULATION RAIN GARDEN RETENTION BTOILWfATEW PCAN nouwp aGLL MMnuun � cuy m., r 17 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 14 00n- A tluszla A.W.. 1t66I115 A..6 P n,r,.,wa waac.n w.xanc,ua: �qBc Pesaca auta.o SIDEWALK SIO�WALK, P.O., SNp1 PLAN fe'.7. !IP Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 15 i }I R floe Ie lunedna N�fgY6erhuA .Frn rui.rn � wa�3tcry.c. EXISTING FENCE ■��a NEW FENCE 0 TREE SPADED TREE BUFFER (.S& AC) s 30,ON S4 FT FEHCIHG ANG flUFFER PLAfF a 21 S -2g -20 MEMORANDUM TO: New Hanover County Planning Department RE: Middlesound LLC "Demarest Pointe„ 3 -30 -20 Notice.for Information Communications and Meetings with Adjacent Residents and Interested Public 4 -9 -20 through 4 -30 -20 5.15 -20 Second Notice For Information 5 -28 -20 Community Meeting; Peace Baptist Church; 320 Military Cutoff Road; Wilmington, NC FROM: Scott D Stewart Middlesound LLC, Member /Manager The 3 -30 -20 Notice For Information generated five on -site meetings, nine email communications generating two letters of support. The on site meetings provided a one hour tour of the development program on the property with the four adjacent property owners on Pickway Court and a property owner across the street in the Princeton Place Neighborhood. Requested clarifications included entrance drive location, exit drive location, position and height of the proposed buildings, stormwater and traffic. Upon physically and visually walking the entire program, with each resident separately, over a three week period, all residents attending were satisfied the proposed program provided well designed traffic management minimizing the impacts to Middlesound Loop Road ingress and egress; provided adequate onsite parking; the building locations with adequate setbacks from existing homes; welcomed the attention to preserving the majority of the trees; providing a stormwater program to address a minimum 100 year storm event; the proposed Demarest Pointe Association will maintain all fencing, buffers and stormwater programs. Commitment to minimize head light glare through landscaping; minimize street lighting with direct downward light patterns. In general, after explaining the program on site, all residents toured were satisfied the high level of detail and thought incorporated into the development plan addressed their clarifications and concerns. The 3 -30 -20 'Notice for Information generated nine email communications. Three of the nine email communications provided statements without the opportunity to explain the design, achievements of the design program or even engage in the first effort to engage in a dialogue which included : "trying to squeeze in the maximum density as the focal point to our loop entrance is a bit on the selfish /greedy side"; Your methods of overbuilding is destroying our town"; "irresponsible of the committee and indicative of what can only be unscrupulous intent by the developer ". The remaining six email were exchanges mostly with Bob Parr only discussing the applications process requiring "to have a virtual meeting ..... to negotiate to reduce density"; a county resident suggestion to apply the EZDZ zoning as an overlay; two letters of support "ln favor of the rezoning ". All communications halve been forwarded to Brad Schuler for the record. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 16 The 5 -Z8 -20 Second Notice of Information provided for a Community Meeting which was attended by twelve (12) residents, one recently moved to Middle Sound in 2016, two moved to Middle Soured in 2004 and the remaining have lived in Middle Sound since the 1980's. Discussion topics 'included zoning, traffic, stormwater, density. After explaining the traffic and storrnwater exhibits in detail, several of the residents who recently moved to Middle Sound appeared satisfied their clarifications and concerns were addressed. of the remaining residents who have resided in .Middle Sound since the 1980's, one supported the rezoning and the others questioned the technical representations of the applications storrnwater and traffic assessments and commenced discussions requiring to negotiate the applications zoning request and conditions to include restrictive pedestrian access signs; performance bonds and to build single family homes with full movement driveways an Middle Sound Loop Road. An adjacent neighbor requested to limit the amount of trees to be removed, a possible fence to limit headlight glare at night at the entrance and offered to meet on site to review the setbacks of the proposed pemarest Pointe residences with their home that provides a setback buffer of 222' due transition from a one story home to the 35' Demarest Pointe residence. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 17 Middlesournd LLC Narnme (please print) 3 • li 1 Z1 12 13 14 1,5 Dernarest Pointe 5 -25 -20 Community Meeting Signature Address Phone # ►-� �.� (A . 16 I board ot Gornmissioners - July , ITEM: 7 - 14 - 18 Email Sign In Sheet Owner Owner _Address Owner_C+ty AMODIO AMANDAI 3608 MIDDLE SOUND} LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ARMITAGE LUKE. E CHRISTINA M 1037 CLIFF RD ASHEBORO, NC 27203 ATKINS FRANCES 104 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BAILEY JOHN LEE MARY ELLEN 7100 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BAKER WILLIAM C JR ASHLEY D 103 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BALKUS ANTHONY J III KAREN MARIE 71031 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 BREWINGTON RUDY JUDITH 1820 WILD WILLOW TR FORT WORTH, Tai 75134 BURTON EARL E III CINDY 4086 GLEN ARBOR DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CAPUTO NICHOLAS A 7109 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CARRIER MATTHEW J ETAL 7101 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CLAMDIGGER PROPERTY GROUP LLC 7204 ADONIS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28485 CORNELIUS ALEXANDRA M JORDAN R 126 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 CRUTCHFIELD NATHANAEL L MARGARET A 245 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 25411 DEFFENBAUGH MICHAEL L ANNETTE 242 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 DOUGLAS CYNTHIA M 3613 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, INC 28413 EVERHART STEVEN H JR MEREDITH 528 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 FXLINE DEAN D KRIS ANN 402 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 GIOIELLI JOSEPH C ETAL 7100 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28405 HALL SCOTT 214 SIMMONS DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 HALL JOHN EDWARD 1105 LT. CONGLETON RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 HINSON ERIC T TAMMY P 138 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 HOWARD MATTHEW COLLEEN 7107 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28405 JOHNSEN WILLIAM ELAINE A 254 BEDFORD RD W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KAHN BARBARA 101 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KAISER CALVIN E DONNA H 118 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KELLEHER PATRICIA L HRS 535 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KELLY STEVEN BLAIR NICOLE MARIE 342 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28409 KING RUBY M 122 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28405 KITT SIMEON A TIARA ATKINS 102 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 KRANCHALK LAURA N JAY MICHAEL 7112 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LAMB JAMES M KAYE D 7104 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LAN DRES THEODORE BARRY 403 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LAYTON KEITH N SHERRY E 7108 OYSTER LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LESTER BRYANT W II 334 LOCKERBY LN WILMINGTON, NC 28411 LU YU X KIN F YEUNG 105 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MCFAYDEN CHARLENE W DENNIS W 608 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MIDDLESOUND LLC 5933 13UNNINGBROOK TER WILMINGTON, NC 28411. MILLARD ANN C 487 FAITH CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MORY EDNA H JAVIER F 7105 HAVEN WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28411 MURRAY BLANCHE LEONA B 130 BRANDYWINE CIR W WILMINGTON, NC 28485 NEW HAN CNTY BD OF EDUCATION 6410 CAROLINA BEACH RD WILMINGTON, NC 28412 PRINCETON PLACE HOA 3530 LEWIS LOOP RD SE BOLIVIA, NC 28422 PRINTY DONALD 7432 NAUTiCA YACHT CLUB DR WILMINGTON, NC 28411 ROGERS BARBIE 100 PICKWAY CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SBOTI KAREN L 3601 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WILMINGTON, NC 28411 SHIVAR GLENN E TIFFANY W 404 JEWELL PT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 Board of Commissioners - Jul 13 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 19 SMITH RANDALL THERESA 402 FAITH CT TAYLOR STEPHEN J CHARLENE K 2029 EASTWOOD RD APT 144 UHLMAN MISTY D 3618 MIDDLE SOUND LOOP RD WERNER STUART MARY K 338 LOCKERBY LN WESNER KATRIN 406 FAITH CT WILKERSON G ALLEN ETAL 3605 MEDDLE SOUND LOOP RD YELLS GARRY ETAL 346 LOCKf=RBY LN Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 20 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 WILMINGTON, NC 25411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411 WILMINGTON, NC 28411. COMMENTS REGARDING THE JUNE 30, 2020 MEETING PEACE BAPTIST CHURCH TO: New Hanover County Commissioners Department of Planning and Land Use RE: Middle Sound LLC- Demarest Point I am writing this letter in support of Scott Stewart's request for R -S (Residential - Moderate -High Density District). Having developed 2 residential Projects and lived in Middle Sound from 1989 — 2008, 1 had the opportunity to work with residence who liked and or opposed my developments. Bob Parr was the protest leader against the residential development I was doing on Darden Road. Dr Parr had a following and I found out after meeting with these folks, they had been given misinformation by Dr Parr and once they realized that they disbanded. I attended the May 281h public meeting held by Mr. Stewart and it was attended by approximately 20 people who question Mr. Stewart, Mr. Dave Spetrino, project builder and Mr. Stewart's design Engineer. I recorded a major portion of the conversations during the 2 hour meeting. I attended the June 30, 2020 meeting held at Peace Baptist Church and listen again to the same questions put forth by those in attendance that were addressed in the May 28 th meeting. I have read the detailed summary of the June 30th meeting and agree with the report as written and presented to you. I also observed and heard comments by some protesting that they had been encouraged to rescind earlier agreements signed with the developer. Statements were made by persons in attendance that the buildings would "overlook Ogden school and pedophiles could see the children and there could be snipers on the roof like there were in Charlotte, and it was coming this way." Mr. Stewart knows those names. In my opinion, this protest is an attempt at character assassination by a few because of personal resentment toward Mr. Stewart. Regards! Ruck O'Shields -122 Partridge Road- Wilmington. NC - 232 -7689 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 21 7/3/2020 meeting comments From: Buck O'Shields (dunbarbuck @aol.com) To: scottstewart6933 @yahoo.com Cc: dunbarbuck @aol.com Date: Thursday, July 2, 2020, 06:01 PM EDT Yahoo Mail - meeting comments RComments Regarding June 30 th meeting.docx 16.6kB 111 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 14 - 22 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 15 - 1 . �rX-1 #I CONDITIONAL REZONING CZ -R -5 RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION DISTRICT EXHIBITS 1 Zoning Map 2 Vicinity &Sidewalk Map � 3 Wetlands Map 4 Flood Map �- 5 Land Area Map , 6 Easement Entitlements 7 Property Survey 8 Master Development Plan Existing Conditions 9 Master Development Plan 10 Architectural Elevation 11 Residence Definition 12 Residence Floor PlanTrees To Be Preserved &Relocated 13 Vehicular Circulation `k Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 1 r 14 Vehicular Circulation NCDOT Traffic Assessment 15 Setback Plan 16 Parking Plan 17 Stormwater Plan 18 Stormwater Plan CSD Engineering Assessment 19 Sidewalk, Post Office &Sign Plan 20 Open Space Plan 21 Fencing &Buffer Plan 22 Tree Survey Existing Conditions 23 Tree Survey 24 Tree Survey Overlaid On Site Plan With Existing Trees To Be Removed, Relocated 25 Tree Survey Overlaid On Site Plan With Existing Trees To Be Preserved &Relocated n DEI�h= ,! POINTE A (lossic American Neighborhood 5 us to in a hiIIty -Diversity - Ecology- Connectivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound L uu. Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING. CDS Eng neerng 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: OEMNXESTMMPANY t k,hus, twd Pknnm ASU Vol-90-N-8411 —23-28 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Pao. ct.tTUA R E S T P O I N T E aav o>,o1�i� oea ovm clm DWG TITLE TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: ypxdN�r Da Q REF. NO. DAT 3128120 E: DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. COVER SHEET V ee STARBUCKS - — RGER -. KING _ei PUBLIX �•xk n SHOPPING r ^wz "A -{1 �uF♦ � � g1 � . CFA 110- r >r ,e ti oT� I'I CA N O PY PO I NTE — WH ITE Air APTS. g OAK I,N, APTS. c� 3l r go, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -16-2 �i « e. € , 'L• 6 �' 1` it X'11 I] r. ji. 1-*- 1 5 +,reef r X c S1 t.. r r r ¢¢ J V�µtk" . a i p',tl ryq ti � 1 4 1 {�5 ,�� i a, et,� r er Ill y T. �ae�:^ i r• + 'pv a . i, y.. %4 Y"�� - d°' @� ' 4, 1.,'`� �*?� :� l� l 1St, l «'R}. 'v 'n. ,r� I^�; �+ �•t�.,' yfF�,:. j`� i r rl . k rtia 7 1 l MIDDL..1; Li :L �r SO U N DI pit, ti�d VI LLAG .. r r �e �r — VVC OGDEN r: _ b r t ELEMENTARY S(H00L a �;I Id �J11 s t }� z� Eil New Hanover County, N C New Hanover County N <� wr A Classic American Neighborhood Susto na61 ly Diversity Ecology Connectivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER. M ddlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wlnington North Carol na 28411 SURVEYOR AtlanCC coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Steat Su to 107 W'Ini ngton North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING COS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: Del-ESTDDMPANY toj.pik,6Aern load vb��ers es rs- BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilh ngton, North Carolina 28401 C O T n R.•,c o E.Tv, uo. N x OC DWG TITLE ZONING MAP GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: O ' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED:"Rr DRAWING NO. 1111all"T AL' A Classic American Neighborhood Suslalnabdily Diversity Ecology Connectivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coas[ Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: esaav OEMANEST CNMPANY mnduape A��M1nens mnd plonneo All BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 PROJECT TITLE A R C S T P O I Iv T L EXISTING NCDOT SIDEWALK MULTI USE - -- FUTURE NCDOT SIDEWALK MULTI USE SIDEWALK NHC DNHC MULTI USE O O O O BIKE LANE DWG TITLE VICINITY SIDEWALKS MAP GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.:¢N rGAR() y5 REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: BOB CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE:NTS CHECKED:Ar DRAWING NO. PvRic esaav t7�1I • N Ik #N il'F, +1:115 M. r F r Middlesound LLC - Demarest Pointe National Wetlands Inventor April 2, 2020 p PROJECT NO.: R f This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife DATE: 3/28120 DRAWN: SOS CHECKED:SDS Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested /Shrub Wetland ❑ Other Wetlands Mapper web site. Estuarine and Marine Wetland Q Freshwater Pond Riverine Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) ITEM: 7 -16-4 This page was produced by the NWI mapper UL•f~ IARLST PdAINTE A Classic American Neighborhood Sustoin obi IIty -Diversity - Ecology- Connectivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 8933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 C7 ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: OEMGeEST PAMPNIY lmdwpe WAnm: W Pknnn A0A c zoall 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 PR D DEC . "LE A R E S T P O I N T E aea o.emvnon Dare ovm clm DWG TITLE WETLANDS MAP GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: R f REF. NO.'¢ DATE: 3/28120 DRAWN: SOS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED:rrrul DRAWING NO. e.ae D—REIT CIMPANI —1-1 3 —R9 —1-1 A. : A'lIr t5oara OT commissioners - Duly I3, LULU / r, 1 ITEM: 7 -16-5 Flood Hazard Areas U Zone VE Zones A. A99, V Zones AE, AH,AD. AE: 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard Contained In Structure, 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard Conditions Zone AE: Fioodway.1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard Conditions: III Floodway, 1% Future Conditions Contained In Channel: Flaodway f1 Zone AE Community Encroachment Area, 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Conditions: Community Encroachment Area 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Contained In Channel, 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone X:1 %Future Condition, 1% Future Conditions Contained I n Channel, X:1% Future Conditions Contained in Structure 1% Future Conditions Contained In Channel: Community Encroachment Area rj Zone X: Protected By Levee Zone D Open Water Zone X 1d �1i�lTI . A Classic American Neighborhood 5ustainaludity- Diveruly @aloAy-Cannectiuity DEVELOPER: Middlesound L c.3 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: OEMASESTCOMPANY mnduape W�M1nem foodPli- ANA min0mn. NG3e<11 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Pao. MTA R E S T P O I N T ev oosm owN cim DWG TITLE FLOOD MAP GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: NeCARd a$� REF. NO. DATE: 3 128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED. DRAWING NO. 4 1111M IEIEIIED -- -vF SaFI.E "iMr. '-5•a. ` „ 4 .y r b 3 *tiy= 1 Nx�s+%3 STEWRR7 � r o .• 3 D9.tlHA •l .as'xn� x rc< t 5•��. E`f�K' =r ' ' 1 1 1 I r!a rYFari.T ++K s.x Hder +'rslRei F MrL �h'dv+. n d 5rf9aF 1: \ S Z lid G.Y' Ildir ik, 3 +yh •A tr6 �LOP.!!N+fl%1' We grrR 1. rlTSy ih rM fN•iAfi'Y S�di.T,ARiB' �.� ^�` 11 1 1 , I rr �..` + , �y ` � sa®x mesas TMSi%me4i�a! �. Awr�w �I , ,.m.. K...Rw : w . _�. p' � �..f; f �t 7#I' f :•,$c'PSAiti 7 r ?, {xw eti .4 AN A W'8 � ww4liwVN. EXHIBIT1 LAND PURCHASE 2005-2008 ;m •. ti -T x a+�� RT . .�• xr sr �� i�rr,� rr��rr —� — —._ ,°.._ rr . � ..� T __ �.. _ ~�vx.. � �'�" r �x Ir4di iE,Ai'A&i l� • ri 1 awrr i 7, w wr.xwv �•r ` A ie \' ® , �" �X. • gYfkf 1 �it4Y34*.4' Ord rs we v. ..s z � s n ,rc4 !!.:.,Tl6M'i':?'..RF.Tf�A ~� � y��F Miff t7 �!4 iar � 1 „vim � sns ra '•”` x.. .ter t� `�y:.z w� .0 ,n a,a wnacg.` EXHIBIT • � - w, a �a.+ xmwa. rnaa,r \ r r�'-" '7 � l.,r,�"�'' ^`o � —__ . ._ 3LOT HMiAlk'2010-2017 1 E 7aBLE � -Ra. k i �». a �• pw- .. -- - � cex� n YEtra o� i11R a�Nlrk '.dG;k "MYb .%Fa k% � ww•rt �.x ea+•.. °way1rO�43a 5§ Y flwh'aY�NO��, ir+.cRd 1 _— -- — STE•.ART S 31efND LOOP BOA n jLi \< � . \� c..•d�t F]�' ��:r` 3m�cx_G- M!irr � '� rxi .wfsri is e[�r •..` \ .lyr y.l� . ` �. u•• 'M"^ n xww cn xc rurcn \ � , wrwe rmrrr c rwixaa \ ` ` � aaren• °.. mmuia• wiol* rx ur¢v,W \ tWSm uq a' DER Ei,EL'EIM. tlk:" wr.a. � ... ♦ ��� ` � � .'�``/ '. �� xirrr� � _ - iLamra�xsrroc' c,* ® wLn sr mxw nxxe.Yieaa�ra�rca me ♦ \ �* •�� auramiw a°' � i� `� r"� [ ei' � � � L0` " aY18.4N5 �I7f'i' ♦ D++� a rac W y„µaw arm axxr 0�f'sLWeElW mraxm .o .raar.'oz, �� � apeq u.aR f'fil rFamr oLRaoa rrnr f+! .xl k 'r ry°��a• gran a.c .rf°..ee�.em.�,,.�aaeia.a m�.�m .,.... ♦ � �e.ivw a arY - -- s ter- r�"� ♦ � °°sr`0nnx i t ,•..,..w., � !'^. ,,...>rrr � � ..e... _ .,dam, � ♦ V ♦ mr: � � "�" �,..�`„« a � .�'� . �, ° yf . r�ww".n' Kd[xlHi ,� ♦ Mm's �ym�y'�q a -j ld riaP.: -y ffiffi !/ rMi S[�•] �L: �4 a��eT'r�a'Pi zawlz rStSRR \ � ' � � i ,'y,�y `..�_ ° =° =.1 � .`ter °..�••° -"C�- '� r?R E Tap. s ,s.[ � t«1 e'ir uarwers* [uvA[ L£ aci n OIW➢ 4W` CL'�'*. LMGM a .r�,b L. :, �L+y. r '� z s• v. _ as CS ST EWART . WfSIDLE SOUND -:00P aoA❑ OIL y{ril',fa nn r � w tea° y♦ ` I)All r. a �, y sxrnu wry Po y` \ \ � . C ate/ � a � F• � at a \\ `� • :,r....µ� - m/ i16'iILY.'ClE1PEHFtl:BY \ 'r} Ena a% �nrrka ltl(sY '•' SC #L4:•L \ c7, r -P 91810 o L - 17 V� y. • \:9'+g '.m""° _ ' _ .4 _ - a�.fEf P.ax x.ni s •mxo Win... s,.a,ia.. a4Nr %.n rw acanr.e \ \ ";a �... w a °y °t. df a QUEENS a:ON \ � a: rss'n a raw w«• �.. 4�4i l� iex. m cw�',«w "'.�.n� �•� \4� � asp \ - - xra ra asxr r3.-0fiss�r0. qr v[a i 's t L1PJE TA�i.E Rade6�e'7�ar.� 'h 3•x.1. }as+c IR.'l =+1i� M r*+ I I I iif 1r" 4a u ' 11 ot %M E %%,. S.P. 140.1 AUMIA '6atiktl FYI. Phi 199! r O 6, �C9 2UM w0t x r >10 sum ssL UAM v Kw Wm , e OCDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL a[ao geM4r ff, abaft 2ia7 IiLSIf AtX+!! sm, FaY£ XFi MSS LOT 1 � I i : f{ HR Anax saa Az O WA- "on M PAM 4 PDT 2 M Fart N�narer M«mtt44� �tpgrxrwF a# lFis {aai. i NOD LrA�xx•7s�mrH•. se Feu ar?s sYLe srsvrr�� �f a]"•r�. flea- �. �MmLmmlr=" � �'viceff Tt�xi Cs�e rear �l�ir u3 akwrnrk.� STATE OF k0ft73i CAROL A COLNTY Of r�6Y eft � v�� � Wt ` T "i1D #Cgg r+}tA4lY� �� kft* B&XK M, PAM V.0 QTY, OMV:Y 7110 PW WP 09 P'LA 1 i§F{ft99 TKS QJ` $PX;AlWX 1 axe TS AFf1itE13 MEETS jai. STATUTORY Rr4" XT.i FM VOW&W- ° .4,i< 4 L1PJE TA�i.E Rade6�e'7�ar.� 'h 3•x.1. }as+c IR.'l =+1i� M r*+ I I I iif 1r" 4a u ' 11 ot %M E %%,. S.P. 140.1 AUMIA '6atiktl FYI. Phi 199! r O 6, �C9 2UM w0t x r >10 sum ssL UAM v Kw Wm , e OCDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL a[ao geM4r ff, abaft 2ia7 IiLSIf AtX+!! sm, FaY£ XFi MSS LOT 1 A" 3LMrRa DVAW of 2Yil�Y + � I i : f{ HR Anax saa Az O WA- "on M PAM 4 PDT 2 M Fart N�narer M«mtt44� �tpgrxrwF a# lFis {aai. i NOD LrA�xx•7s�mrH•. se Feu ar?s sYLe srsvrr�� �f a]"•r�. flea- �. r+m iaC��t��i++a �4�p3y ss+r m�, rwr avcc� rricA `„ sY(►'(S hkCe l'NH @�n9[et$�?y �F �}4ST' Ci ffiEvHBf• {rase � �'viceff Tt�xi Cs�e rear �l�ir u3 akwrnrk.� STATE OF k0ft73i CAROL A COLNTY Of r�6Y eft � v�� � Wt ` T "i1D #Cgg r+}tA4lY� �� kft* B&XK M, PAM V.0 QTY, OMV:Y 7110 PW WP 09 P'LA 1 i§F{ft99 TKS QJ` $PX;AlWX 1 axe TS AFf1itE13 MEETS jai. STATUTORY Rr4" XT.i FM VOW&W- ° .4,i< 4 upw 1.� PAM ft am MCC" err fflue, f AT& i{.1ww,%Fwm• LOT JR r 145,.T'3 mq.IR. LOT 10-'2 f:A^T o.�z a ff f g Try'm • i ! F2� - •�.,,� A" 3LMrRa DVAW of 2Yil�Y + � I i : f{ HR Anax saa Az O WA- "on M PAM 4 PDT 2 M Fart N�narer M«mtt44� �tpgrxrwF a# lFis {aai. i �i. LrA�xx•7s�mrH•. se Feu ar?s sYLe srsvrr�� �f a]"•r�. flea- �. r+m iaC��t��i++a �4�p3y ss+r m�, rwr avcc� rricA `„ sY(►'(S hkCe l'NH @�n9[et$�?y �F �}4ST' Ci ffiEvHBf• {rase � �'viceff Tt�xi Cs�e rear �l�ir u3 akwrnrk.� STATE OF k0ft73i CAROL A COLNTY Of r�6Y eft � v�� � Wt ` T "i1D #Cgg r+}tA4lY� �� j QTY, OMV:Y 7110 PW WP 09 P'LA 1 i§F{ft99 TKS QJ` $PX;AlWX a w 4x,. ruse€ as TS AFf1itE13 MEETS jai. STATUTORY Rr4" XT.i FM VOW&W- ° upw 1.� PAM ft am MCC" err fflue, f AT& i{.1ww,%Fwm• LOT JR r 145,.T'3 mq.IR. I (W) 13is31`RY fTPI FY THAT 1 AN (WE Aft) TW OOM CF TW PMWRTY SfiE'iYirrl AW OMMM T{ Q8 AM THAT 1 ( HFW aloe OUX -ATE ALL S(*IM ALC.EM MY,% PAdEt6a AW t#if€ A AREAS 'tO PUf1M OX PWATF WX AS kD F1e."71 , f (Vg) CAE r1! t' 'H& LAM ATE DATE C+A�k32 _ 7 mvdw onaw tom• the Fw Pubo k UtSKI AtsU q,% We Mertow YRtf�Y EiM F.Bti�NTGiH# la a'i'm maofM as &'%014 iFfti' S% I tY4i�.R�E4 lv 2�!'9 tdt'1 'Tt51.E1"fi'4 ii i4C' Y181a4C'A�. 1 ! r+e�,a8 Liti lr 9%- *w E` eam ov { ; swrwx S —A nisi r � 1pm 4% : m r W0. F Lrof aFt Lof W-1 �^ R:fl!f smts� $3'f sq.►P. dFd3F.'TS°t7.SF .6 -.R ^•...� r' ! 1.0743 y 1 � � i 3h FhTs r e axtAtm Km fiarivaw Cuuxty yEx�pu *A � aeen fir elwrnx d aw= xy C� rtty Erwoc a x�r 9li pw m &=K MMACE *UAlW-iXK, KO 2U41.f 3TT f3. STkWlf r, VA4A4M DER WA- "on M PAM 4 PDT 2 M Fart N�narer M«mtt44� �tpgrxrwF a# lFis {aai. i }� � &uv sped F?at IMo-t � :•?a0T'dn LrA�xx•7s�mrH•. se Feu ar?s sYLe srsvrr�� �f a]"•r�. flea- �. r+m iaC��t��i++a �4�p3y ss+r m�, rwr avcc� rricA `„ sY(►'(S hkCe l'NH @�n9[et$�?y �F �}4ST' Ci ffiEvHBf• {rase � �'viceff Tt�xi Cs�e rear �l�ir u3 akwrnrk.� v Sii�ya F ZAP Y, L. S=T VAGUE, k7L.3. KM i..-14Uq WUVY - THIS PLA-1 = �, ' i- Z SEAL #Cgg r+}tA4lY� �� j f y a w 4x,. ruse€ as R:fl!f smts� $3'f sq.►P. dFd3F.'TS°t7.SF .6 -.R ^•...� r' ! 1.0743 y 1 � � i 3h FhTs r e axtAtm Km fiarivaw Cuuxty yEx�pu *A � aeen fir elwrnx d aw= xy C� rtty Erwoc a x�r 9li pw m &=K MMACE *UAlW-iXK, KO 2U41.f 3TT f3. STkWlf r, VA4A4M DER IM 11. F"W SY- S SUM 103 iRrT1A'U1VI1i{?7Pa1. FK; �� g 91tl.'�b.Ci14.5 +fiR3rsr STEW ART {{ y. «F C w a 0 CW TV46 Im" NFt76 0 Nr%s MMAR %rm r T M m 00"emE KnawNT 0 T;i41,CUL.A`I LD FmmT WI) 4f0Ctrvu nLrry?,DRAD4gx: Emocwri FM THE EXV_VSD WE = UP 0,01DWE PRF(Cul PD # fi94lw- m- m_. ALL. WTAUPZ3 ARF 14£RT.iZWA{_ GMeld[3 I25iAMMS.. rmE mAT'ikn »' w s wr ►gym aA w. rA ef. FLOW 1iAfARV xe, TRACT IS R--.M FIATTED 3w mr AcC,T�'r�rL'T1f. n 'IIFiAwA is FM OLNUlf OF LOY T. L M N*11; SEA ?. LOT 1, QXMS VMT, SE4 G i � A I*%_WzW AKD 'KWt SASSWENr REVaD FUR Qum4S P4][PFT Mu 5 I.C?T t. SEGT43M & -A REMSM LOT lR. ZECTM 5—A WT 2R SEE MAP 0" 41. PAW NO, BOW :5ii. PAW, M rOR VAR'OtM t7E.COitL CWA#M ACES NO WU r 5 HAVE LET•! FOMM ON Silk I" ET•i>al?K3Alia14:HiJtiE.. sr F IVSPMTMC DAM LAMARY % 2W9, RY LMQ 1i§Ff:. iA INS SURD f WAS tx"OTM YdTIWT AN UMAIFED BILE Aw"T I ATV WA- AHD s i . " CASE iEM 11'UM14C WILRY Ai1TIi#IIt;TY LOT i SECTION 5.A. QUEENS POINT (rte WW *.s, PAM 2Q) AND raSG" MMAVAMN OF LOT R Li E1.., Z $ O t7 QUENNS POINT (MATS WXW 14, PAGL 15) WANETT TDVKS�V NEV I-MW U E:iMT f, WI MI FARtl MA DAM, J~7 ?.2, W9 SCALD 21"-1g1' wl�rw�ml:��af�frff3�. IM71; amiff-m w mY L L stwr Blow, 40vary "AdM' Tm puff Von AWtM 41f" we UPUNIMFm FAW *0 +aw1 sSPS LYE m MI! T*A,t m swwma Mar . vo ►.MF azwr wwau At iw&ik MW WDTOPsUW flTUaat rM 3W -AL. VNX a ltKV IW MM W MEM M 04 teY'.Ckl.l ft >A i tK+N10.4 OW l%a Ak+te 4a Fi UNU V 4194ROOOKE vm 0,11� 4Y-au AS ewe w ter.. Am M4CRm EI� Mkt 'Tom WIN aw w .M11 Aft ■ WA- "on M PAM 4 PDT 2 M Fart N�narer M«mtt44� �tpgrxrwF a# lFis {aai. i }� � &uv sped F?at IMo-t � :•?a0T'dn LrA�xx•7s�mrH•. se Feu ar?s sYLe srsvrr�� �f a]"•r�. flea- �. r+m iaC��t��i++a �4�p3y ss+r m�, rwr avcc� rricA `„ sY(►'(S hkCe l'NH @�n9[et$�?y �F �}4ST' Ci ffiEvHBf• {rase � �'viceff Tt�xi Cs�e rear �l�ir u3 akwrnrk.� v Sii�ya F ZAP Y, L. S=T VAGUE, k7L.3. KM i..-14Uq WUVY - THIS PLA-1 = �, ' i- Z SEAL #Cgg r+}tA4lY� �� FF FS A aWtY TI4AT £ A719 Yt s1 T1PMIDK iB ia@]I3 Vf €T1fiTpi ?e l -ssg6 a F \ TiE A IRS A eC(l�iY � s#t.TAFtETY iSiAT tk�s5 N# IIiTDStkfi>.: 7 w 91GWL471 PMPI�LX it' LM4& IM 11. F"W SY- S SUM 103 iRrT1A'U1VI1i{?7Pa1. FK; �� g 91tl.'�b.Ci14.5 +fiR3rsr STEW ART {{ y. «F C w a 0 CW TV46 Im" NFt76 0 Nr%s MMAR %rm r T M m 00"emE KnawNT 0 T;i41,CUL.A`I LD FmmT WI) 4f0Ctrvu nLrry?,DRAD4gx: Emocwri FM THE EXV_VSD WE = UP 0,01DWE PRF(Cul PD # fi94lw- m- m_. ALL. WTAUPZ3 ARF 14£RT.iZWA{_ GMeld[3 I25iAMMS.. rmE mAT'ikn »' w s wr ►gym aA w. rA ef. FLOW 1iAfARV xe, TRACT IS R--.M FIATTED 3w mr AcC,T�'r�rL'T1f. n 'IIFiAwA is FM OLNUlf OF LOY T. L M N*11; SEA ?. LOT 1, QXMS VMT, SE4 G i � A I*%_WzW AKD 'KWt SASSWENr REVaD FUR Qum4S P4][PFT Mu 5 I.C?T t. SEGT43M & -A REMSM LOT lR. ZECTM 5—A WT 2R SEE MAP 0" 41. PAW NO, BOW :5ii. PAW, M rOR VAR'OtM t7E.COitL CWA#M ACES NO WU r 5 HAVE LET•! FOMM ON Silk I" ET•i>al?K3Alia14:HiJtiE.. sr F IVSPMTMC DAM LAMARY % 2W9, RY LMQ 1i§Ff:. iA INS SURD f WAS tx"OTM YdTIWT AN UMAIFED BILE Aw"T I ATV WA- AHD s i . " CASE iEM 11'UM14C WILRY Ai1TIi#IIt;TY LOT i SECTION 5.A. QUEENS POINT (rte WW *.s, PAM 2Q) AND raSG" MMAVAMN OF LOT R Li E1.., Z $ O t7 QUENNS POINT (MATS WXW 14, PAGL 15) WANETT TDVKS�V NEV I-MW U E:iMT f, WI MI FARtl MA DAM, J~7 ?.2, W9 SCALD 21"-1g1' wl�rw�ml:��af�frff3�. IM71; amiff-m w mY L L stwr Blow, 40vary "AdM' Tm puff Von AWtM 41f" we UPUNIMFm FAW *0 +aw1 sSPS LYE m MI! T*A,t m swwma Mar . vo ►.MF azwr wwau At iw&ik MW WDTOPsUW flTUaat rM 3W -AL. VNX a ltKV IW MM W MEM M 04 teY'.Ckl.l ft >A i tK+N10.4 OW l%a Ak+te 4a Fi UNU V 4194ROOOKE vm 0,11� 4Y-au AS ewe w ter.. Am M4CRm EI� Mkt 'Tom WIN aw w .M11 Aft ■ d MIDDLESOUND LLC rn TRACTS 1 AND 2 AREA: 146,129 SQ, FT. 3.35 ACRES \ NOT TO SCALE \ ACCESS, UTILITY, AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT: 31,381 SQ. FT 0.72 ACRES r \ qp3 d M \ EIR / S. \ u+ \ z \ _ D � - RpA DLE SOUND 0' PUBLIC F - r AI1 D N �� °5 '06" E 5A5.58 S 25'011`58" 25.32' —\ EIP TRACT 1 24,332± Sq. Ft. ERB r2.85± Ac. EIP MIDDLESOUND, LLC ` DEED BOOK 6123, PAGE 2090 �O PARCEL #R04400- 008 - 001 -000 b '<b � , r\ � 4 0 6y z 90 o, 6 =RB EIP 1� TRACT 2 21,797± Sq. Ft. 0.504 Ac. MIDDLESOUND, LLC DEED BOOK 6123, PAGE 2090 PARCEL #R04400- 008 - 011 -000 EIR EIP 1 <ve� QUO h^ < }o`er Q I LC7 N - / I / LOT STEVEN H. EVERHART, JR. and wife MERIDETH T. EVERHART DEED BOOK 4728, PAGE 757 PARCEL #804400- 008 - 010 -000 yf� LOT 2 QUEENS POINT / SECTION 5 -A REVISED i MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357 \ DEED BOOK 5745, PAGE 2521 PARCEL #R04411- 002 - 022 -000 AUD EASEMENT \ 6,226 S.F. (0.14 ACRES) LOT SIZE / 20,925 S.F. 0.48 ACRES) \ WITH EA EMENTS TOTAL AREA ECOMBINATION PLAT\ / TRACTS 1 AND 2° LOT 1R.1 - LOT 1R.2 146,129± Sq. Ft. / MAP BOOK 55, PAGE 356 3.35± Ac. DEED BOOK 5557, PAGE 641 �/ LOCATED FROM COUNTY GIS INFORMATION, EXISTING DRAWINGS & FIELD SURVEY . SO - 0 EXISTING IRON PIPE GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND EXHIBIT MAP. 2. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357.67' ERB* EXISTNG DEBAR ABANDONED, OR THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT 3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TRACT 1 LOCATION INDICATED. HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS 4. UNITS ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. — — — — — ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS \ NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. \ 5. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY, LINES NOT SURVEYED (ADJOINERS) 10. COUNTY PARCEL #R04400- 008 - 001 -000 AND #R04400- 008 - 011 -000. \ 6. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF SITE. ABBREVIATIONS: 11. TOTAL SITE AREA: 146,129± SQUARE FEET (3.351 ACRES) CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY & MAPPING 7. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE 12. MAP &DEED REFERENCES (PER NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRY): DEED BOOK 5599, PAGE 2156 MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN REPORT. THIS SURVEY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS AND EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL AND ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH. 8. FLOOD NOTE: AS DETERMINED BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING, THIS PROPERTY APPEARS \I� EIP TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE "X" (MINIMAL FLOOD RISK) PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #3720316900 J, EFFECTIVE DATE 4/3/06. SO, \ 9 UTILITY STATEMENT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN OF ANY) HAVE BEEN Sq. Ft. SQUARE FEET ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47 -30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER 1� TRACT 2 21,797± Sq. Ft. 0.504 Ac. MIDDLESOUND, LLC DEED BOOK 6123, PAGE 2090 PARCEL #R04400- 008 - 011 -000 EIR EIP 1 <ve� QUO h^ < }o`er Q I LC7 N - / I / LOT STEVEN H. EVERHART, JR. and wife MERIDETH T. EVERHART DEED BOOK 4728, PAGE 757 PARCEL #804400- 008 - 010 -000 yf� LOT 2 QUEENS POINT / SECTION 5 -A REVISED i MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357 \ DEED BOOK 5745, PAGE 2521 PARCEL #R04411- 002 - 022 -000 AUD EASEMENT \ 6,226 S.F. (0.14 ACRES) LOT SIZE / 20,925 S.F. 0.48 ACRES) \ WITH EA EMENTS TOTAL AREA ECOMBINATION PLAT\ / TRACTS 1 AND 2° LOT 1R.1 - LOT 1R.2 146,129± Sq. Ft. / MAP BOOK 55, PAGE 356 3.35± Ac. DEED BOOK 5557, PAGE 641 �/ LOCATED FROM COUNTY GIS INFORMATION, EXISTING DRAWINGS & FIELD SURVEY v 7 O - 0 EXISTING IRON PIPE INFORMATION. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UTILITIES \ 0 SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ERB* EXISTNG DEBAR ABANDONED, OR THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LINETYPE LEGEND: TRACT 1 LOCATION INDICATED. HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS EIP — — — — — ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS \ NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. \ ��' �O LINES NOT SURVEYED (ADJOINERS) 10. COUNTY PARCEL #R04400- 008 - 001 -000 AND #R04400- 008 - 011 -000. \ Q� ABBREVIATIONS: 11. TOTAL SITE AREA: 146,129± SQUARE FEET (3.351 ACRES) CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY & MAPPING SUBTOTAL EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE 12. MAP &DEED REFERENCES (PER NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRY): DEED BOOK 5599, PAGE 2156 MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN �✓� �O \ 41 AND OTHERS THAT MAY BE SHOWN ON THIS MAP) ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOON 5599, PAGE 13. PROPERTY ZONING: 'R -20" RESIDENTIAL 2156, ETC.); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM (RESIDENTIAL) INFORMATION AS FOUND IN MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 357: AND OTHERS SHOWN HEREON; THAT THE / SO, RATIO OF PRECISION, AS CALCULATED, IS 1:10,000+; THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN MB MAP BOOK / CABINET Sq. Ft. SQUARE FEET ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47 -30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER PG PAGE Y AND SEAL THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, A.D. 2020. G.S. 47 -30 (B (11) (d) \ ' tIDARAA''1'M�y J v " 9,S SYMBOL LEGEND: TRACT NO - LOT NO - 0 EXISTING IRON PIPE EIR* EXISTING IRON ROD ERB* EXISTNG DEBAR ACRES LINETYPE LEGEND: TRACT 1 CHECKED: SURVEYED LINES (BOUNDARY) — — — — — — LINES PER RECORD DATA R04400- 008 -011 -000 LINES NOT SURVEYED (ADJOINERS) - - - RIGHT -OF -WAY ABBREVIATIONS: SUBTOTAL EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE R/W RIGHT -OF -WAY EIR EXISTING IRON ROD 3.35 $.R. STATE ROUTE RBS REBAR SET 5,899 MB MAP BOOK / CABINET Sq. Ft. SQUARE FEET PG PAGE Ac. ACRES 8,271 4S �„" 0(�„ 5 J� S• HEREBY FU.....«�..NOIHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, 0.R 0 XCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. �, = TEL \ _' $ 0 WA H A L - I N LAND U YO L- 9 'RI•.E Ne.YIAA' \ \ EIP TAX PARCEL ID TRACT NO - LOT NO EASEMENT SQUARE FEET TOTAL SQUARE FEET ACRES R04400- 008 - 001 -000 TRACT 1 CHECKED: 124,332.00 REIEIIED R04400- 008 -011 -000 TRACT 2 21,797.00 SUBTOTAL 146,129.00 146,129.00 3.35 R04411- 001 - 001 -000 LOT 9R 5,899 R04411- 002 - 026 -000 LOT 1R.1 8,271 R04411- 002 - 021 -000 LOT 1R2 1098.5 R04411- 002 - 022 -000 LOT 2 F,, SUBTOTAL �1 -;I 31,381 0.73 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -16-8 � PARCEL #804411- 002 - 021 -000 AUD EASEMENT TOTAL EASEMENT 10,985 S.F. (0.25 ACRES) AREA: LOT SIZE e 31,381 S.F. 23,077 S.F. 0.52 ACRES,) \ EA EMENTS LOT 1R.1 - / RECOMBINATION PLAT \ ERB LOT 1 R.1 -LOT 1 R.2 / MAP BOOK 55, PAGE 356 /I DEED BOOK 5582, PAGE 170 rr� PARCEL #R04411- 002 - 026 -000 V AUD EASEMENT 1p� 8,271 S.F. (0.19 ACRES) A A LOT SIZE Fp 21,974 S.F. 0.50 ACRES) �R, p�°9oq'Nq q WITH EASEMENTS s�se�oFF�F� \' ANT / QU EONS POINT 9ssJ SUBDIVISION SECTION 3 MAP BOOK 14, PAGE 15 DEED BOOK 6083, PAGE 227 PARCEL /�R04411- 001 - 001 -000 AUD EASEMENT 1,842 SLOT( SIZE ACRES) s0• 15,303 S.F. (0.35 ACRES) y� F WITH EASEMENTS / / EIP JOB N0: 17 -1111 0 m� U a tr yam, � ~ N O Y EC & Z LJ m 2 D z o d z 9 Ld z Z z ME so Ed 0 a U ry Z J B- °Q�z H Uj o�FDID LL a E ¢D w o W U U a a - O O p O z z O Z N O U-1 ~ J D o z D g N th O Lr� o mR N S au 'E 0 I 3 � a o" °ao F1, ,dNTE A Classic American Neighborhood Sustninnhility Diveruty Emingy- (annecrivity DEVELOPER: M Gdlesound LLC 6933 Runn ng Brook Terrace W Im ngton, Nerth Carol na 28411 SURVEYOR: AtlanL c Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street Su to 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: ISEMARESTCOMPNIY l dw IuhlInN and Msso ASA minOmn. NG-11 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 o T E M D A R E S T P O I N T N Rry D.amP11� Dem DYm cIm DWG TITLE PROPERTY SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: ¢ a$� 4 0.LUL Arr" REP. NO. DATE: 3 128120 DRAWN: BIDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. REIEIIED ^I:*:-`)"111i, 4 "04 ww- II 61, 170* '►: i w Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -16-9 1 —Y 7— " r - t _ IX A 1 t P r� 4 d W r tI F I . 1, 1 /NTI. A Classic American Neighborhood 5 usrainnhility -Dive rsity.Eml ogy- Cannecrivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running amok Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMA STMMPANY tm a,M1i- tnrdPlsso ASA min0mn. NG3e<11 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Pao. MTA R E S T P O I N T. .72 ACRES STORMWATER EASEMENT 3.35 ACRES CONDITIONAL i R -5 REZONING 4.07 ACRES PROVIDED FOR IMPROVEMENTS '- ------ ------- - - - - -- , R -5 ZONING 8 RESIDENCES PER ACRE 3.35 ACRES x 8 = 26.8 RESIDENCES 24TOWNHOMES PROPOSED 4.07 ACRES PROVIDED 24 TOWNHOMES PROPOSED 24 DIVIDED BY 4.07 ACRES = 5.91 RES. /AC. 6 RESIDENCES PER ACRE ON LAND PROVIDED Pry D.a�Pa� Dem Dvm cim DWG TITLE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: 9.wr 0.ru1 p*' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SOS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED:Pr DRAWING NO. -1Y.—Ts.. 8 IL IEIEIIED t PW' I R 1 4 1 f sal 4 Y e L_ 4 1 y. 'w IV ��- Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 10 �n ,* iSayte^ 1 .;x: i+ jk 'lv! e Y \s PROJECT NO.: .,• PV I 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering S 4 1 r I A Classic American Neighborhood Sustalnnhlllty- Diversity Ecam9wcnnnectivlty PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: UEMANESTCUMPANY londuu eWM1'nens twd Pbnnm ASU 1— aunnln mi Mr.NG3¢C11 ¢1639 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 D oECMTA ft E 5 T E .72 ACRES STORMWATER EASEMENT - -, _.. - - - -- 3.35 ACRES CONDITIONAL L_____R -5 REZONING I-------------------------- 4.07 ACRES PROVIDED FORIMPROVEMENTS '--------------- R-5 ZONING 8 RESIDENCES PER ACRE 3.35 ACRES x 8 = 26.8 RESIDENCES 24 TOWNHOMES PROPOSED 4.07 ACRES PROVIDED 24 TOWNHOMES PROPOSED 24 DIVIDED BY 4.07 ACRES = 5.91 RESJAC. 6 RESIDENCES PER ACRE ON LAND PROVIDED ev o«mP DWG TITLE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: w� D ry� 5 v �' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: BOB CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. a,e 9 ea !s� PBC DESIGN BUILD IIIIIIIII ys_ will Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 11 'Ib l rin. A Classic American Neighborhood Sustairoblrily, Diversity Ecology connectivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER. M ddlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace W nnington North Carolna 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Strout, Suite 107 Wilmington North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING COS Eng neering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: OEMAREST CUMPANY londuope W�M1Aern 1p�d pb��ers AAA 6133R B—T... W11—o- NC28411 910-231-28 BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 DOCC MTA R P 3 T P O I N T f DWG TITLE ARCHITETCTURAL ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: O 0.ru1 REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: BOB CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. o 1 esaa RESIDENCE 1 RESIDENCE 2 DESIGN BUILD Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 12 w1w — ,r - RESIDENCE 3 RESIDENCE 4 .� Cl dK . r A Classic American Neighborhood sustainnh011p Diversity Ecology Connectivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 5933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIV IL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: 11EMI18ESTCIIMPMY I.6,cii hitirk Imd Pknma "i min9lon, NC se -e BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 C TA 2 E 8 T P D I N T f DoE M DWG TITLE RESIDENCE DEFINITION GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: 4Q- uWSC.w TA R REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: BIDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. Ia,e 1 a ALLEY ALLEY � ALLEY )p 64' GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCE • OFFICE / BEDROOM / BATH • GARAGE PBC DB' BUILD 4 STREET Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 13 FIRST FLOOR LIVING RM • DINING RM • KITCHEN • BATH PBCI DESIGN +BUILD STREET SECOND FLOOR 2 BEDROOMS • 2 BATHROOMS DESIGN BUILD STREET � F1, ANTI A Classic American Neighborhood 5ustainaulity- Diveruty @aloAy-Cannectivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 17717 ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: OEMA STMMPANY t d. hilms lmd Pknnn ASA minamn. C-11 9 BUILDER /� PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Pao. MTA R E S T P ev �moaan rn^m clm DWG TITLE FLOOR PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: k. * 9.wr 0.ru1 REF. NO. DATE: 3 /28120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED:rr DRAWING NO. e.aa 12 eaea Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual Estimated Number Of Trips Generated TrRffi dl pad - A Troaff (Il pact �nzallpis (TIA) Must Be Completed For All Proposed Developments That Genereate More Than 100 Peak Hour Trips ITEM: 7 - 16 - 14 F1 — A Classic American Neighborhood sustainnhairy- Diversity Emloswcnnnenimty DEVELOPER: Middlesound L 0g33 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: eEMASESTCUMPANY I.d,.pi W,6'nens Ina! Pli n ASLI minalon.ti 38011 a BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 D oEC MTA R E S T P O I N T L .aaNrvi =�.uenniPUramsm Nei o«mPUOn o:a ovm clm DWG TITLE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: CA REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 TA DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: v DRAWING NO. o,a.� 13 AM Peak PM Peak Land Use T} {pe C. �* Size Urit Adj {Gen Rate Eq 4 Hour Hour Trips Hour Trips Enter Exit Enter Exit Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) [Data Range: 0- 5001 Residential 220 24 11 Dwelling Unit_ Adjacent x 141 3 9 1Q lE TrRffi dl pad - A Troaff (Il pact �nzallpis (TIA) Must Be Completed For All Proposed Developments That Genereate More Than 100 Peak Hour Trips ITEM: 7 - 16 - 14 F1 — A Classic American Neighborhood sustainnhairy- Diversity Emloswcnnnenimty DEVELOPER: Middlesound L 0g33 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: eEMASESTCUMPANY I.d,.pi W,6'nens Ina! Pli n ASLI minalon.ti 38011 a BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 D oEC MTA R E S T P O I N T L .aaNrvi =�.uenniPUramsm Nei o«mPUOn o:a ovm clm DWG TITLE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: CA REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 TA DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: v DRAWING NO. o,a.� 13 aaea� Ell RE: [External] Re: Middlesound LLC - 500 & 3626 Middle Sound Loop Read - Demarest Pointe - Master Development Plan - 24 Townhome Residences From: Cumbo, Daniel R [dreumbo @ncdot.gov) To: scottstewart Cc jroan @ncdot.gov Date: Monday, March 23, 2024, 07:17 AM EDT Scott, Thank you again for coordinating with Ni on the review of your proposed development. Please see below NCOOT responses to the items below related to the Demarest Pointe proposed development: 1. Requirement for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA); ATIA will not be required by NODDY and is below the Will and County thresholds for requirement of a TEA. 2. Location and proposed alignment for Demarest Pointe entrance, point of Ingress: NCDOT is in agreement with the entrance access as proposed in your conceptual plan. Ai turn lane will not be required based on our review of the roadway and site traffic volumes. 3_ Location and proposed alignment for Demarest Pointe; exit, point of Egress; NGDDT is In agreement with the exit access as proposed in your conceptual plan. 4. Commentary regarding preference specific to Egress onto Middle Sound Loop Road, as shown on the attached Master Development Plan or is there a preference for the possible alternate Egress location utilizing the accessfutilityldrainage easement provided through 3618 Middle Sound Loop Road onto Pick-way Court to Middle Sound Loop Road, h GDOT dues not have a preference with regard to exit access alternatives described above, 5. General internal vehicular circulation alignment and vehicular flow pattern of the Demarest Pointe neighborhood design relationship (one way vehicular pattern, right in, right out) to the existing vehicular patterns of Middle Sound Loop Road, the Middle Sound Loop Road Round - A - Bout and Ogden Elementary School points of Ingress, Egress and vehicular flow patterns. The Demarest Pointe access design provides excellent access management with limited movement right -in and ht -out driveways instead of traditional full movement intersections. The roundabout provides a nearby intersection for hicular site traffic to make U-turn type movements to accommodate left -in and left -out movements related to the velopment site. NCDOT does not have any Concerns related to the development exit access relative to the school veways. In general, the development design is well thought out in regard to circulation and How of traffic. Please let us know if you have any questions or if add tionW Information is needed. Sincerely, -Dan Daniel R. Cumbo, PE Deputy District Engineer pivision 3 i District 3 (910) 398 -9100 !L JW Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 _ ►.' f ' �� ITEM: 7 - 16 - 15 �'► s r. c F11- ,iNTE A Classic American Neighborhood 5ustainalulily Diveroty Emlagy- (annecrivity DEVELOPER: Middle sound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: oEMgRESTeM4PN1Y t dwPi tmd Pknnm ASA BUILDER C DESIGN PB -BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 o T E M D A R E S T P O I N T E P,� o.,mvtlm oem oYm ,do DWG TITLE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION NCDOT GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: . � Oil REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED:Rr DRAWING NO. 14 jf ti * L _ IE 197 r, ` 222 VIP )010 . i Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ~I ITEM: 7 - 16 - 16 sh dk—iw- _ _ a I&Kr I A Classic American Neighborhood Sustu nab -I-tp D versity Ecam9wCnnnectivity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: COS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMASESTCDMPANY Iond- p-haem tmd Pbnnm ASLI minMon. rvc watt e BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 D oEC MTA R E S T P O LAND AREA 4.07 ACRES DWG TITLE SETBACK PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: CA;? TR. Y' ry� 5 v �' REF, NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. ,a,e 15 m w I � 4 � ra 1 IL I 4 1 % �.► '�` t t t I A Classic American Neighborhood 5usrmnabilitp- Diversity EmloswCanneniuitp DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Anamm Coast survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: COS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: UEMASESTCUMPANY Ionduupe W�M1'nens Ina! pkm,o 6133R 13—T.— ASU minalon. rvc zaCtt a BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 "o""T"LE TA R E S T P O I N T L 24 TOWNHOMES 3.2 SPACES / UNIT 1 GARAGE / UNIT 1 PARKING/ UNIT 1 GUEST/ UNIT 5 ADDITIONAL SPACES 77 SPACES TOTAL rvep a�mp,� DWG TITLE PARKING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: w� D 1`$ TA. Y' ry� 5 v �' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. a,a 16 a A 1b le a d. 7. imp 4k ZZ Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 18 10F 79 v It V L dew V- op.-" r, I -AA fi 41 A Classic American Neighborhood Sustanubday Diversity E(alogy-Carnentivity DEVELOPER: Middl L C 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, N,dh Camline, 28411 A1111111 Coast S—ey 1200 N 23rd Steer, S.D. 107 Wilmington North Carol 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wil'ington, North Camlina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: I uE1yq STWMPMIY lm d-pik,heei, trod pii- w 1933R.1111,13--ii Wure.N-11 9-31-ere BUILDER PBCDESIGN � %.'10LD 314 Walnut Sheet Wilmington, North C-11n, 28401 "LE D. . A T 1 0 T E 11 1 1 T I I I E I I L I I T I L A n CIRCULATION RAIN GARDEN RETENTION 7= DING TITLE STORMWATER PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: 34 �TEO I REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE:NTS CHECKED DRAWING NO. rrnm 17 IL ie— —ERIED ,� Vl Scott D. Stewart Middlesound,LLC 6933 Runningbrook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 Demarest Point Prel /Conceptual stormwater Calculations New Hanover County CSD ENGINEERING We have reviewed the conceptual stormwater management program for Demarest Pointe and ran calculations using 65,066 sf impervious coverage you suggested as the estimated built upon area for all improvements and arrived at the following assessments for the various design storms: 3$05 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, NG 28403- 910 7914442 - www.csd- engineering.com — Wcense # C-2710 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 19 Demurest Pointe SW Cokulutions 12 Please let us know if you have any questions or require any additional information on the matter. Howard Resnik, PE, LEER AP 3805 Cherry Avenue - Wilmington, NC 28403 - 910 791 4441 - www,csd- engineering.com — License # C -2710 1. 'li:)1NTE A Classic American Neighborhood 5ustainaulity- Diveruty Emlgy- Cannecriuity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: COS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMMIESTDDMPNiY l dw -Mut, lmd Pknnn W mingmn.N Ull 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Sheet Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 o T E M D A R E S T P O I N T E CIRCULATION RAIN GARDEN RETENTION Pry D.a�Prlan Dam Dvm cim DWG TITLE STORMWATER PLAN CSD GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: N eCARp( ¢ a$� REF. NO. DATE: 3 128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED. DRAWING NO. e.aa 18 eaea �J - J Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 "" W,— IRV ITEM: 7 - 16 - 20 S� L: C A Classic American Neighborhood saeto nablly -D Teri ty Ernlogy- (ennectnity DEVELOPER: Middleaound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, S. 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: oEMANESTWMPANY t d- nk,hlna, tmd Pknnm ANA 1933RUn111 minplon.NC2.1- BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Pao E M C TA R E S T P O I N T E SIDEWALK Pay o�rquen oea oYm cim DWG TITLE SIDEWALK, P. O., SIGN PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: w� Q( 3❑ �TEO 1`$ TA I rjs REF, NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. e.ae 19 IEIEIIED � I 1 r Mrr s 1� r- - r ' 1 � — � 7— � �p r .�i�'►. , "..ice+ _ � �r'`' ,* ��. t Mill 7Q . 0 1)j FF 4% a AL eiill% ' AL Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 _ ITEM: 7 - 16 - 21 , r i �I 1 A Classic American Neighborhood 5 t inlay- Divers Ip Ecology Connectivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER. Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Allanllc Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Stuart, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: COS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: UEMANETC°MPANY I.duupe W,6'nens land pli- ASU minalon.NC38Ci1 a BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 DoEC MTA R E S T P O I N T L •--------------------- - - - - -1 3.35 ACRES CONDITIONAL: R -5 REZONING -- - - - -.a . --- --- -------- - - - - -' R -5 ZONING 8 RESIDENCES PER ACRE 3.35 ACRES x 8 = 26.8 RESIDENCES 24 TOWNHOMES PROPOSED PROPERTY 3.35 AC 100 IMPROVEMENTS „_ €.. 1.50 AC 45% OPEN SPACE 1.85 AC 55 DWG TITLE OPEN SPACE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: wC D TR. Y' ry� 5 r �' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. a, 20 a w 1 4 � W i � R � 1 4 1 « t Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 22 i L 6 YF S n A 0 C 0 0 �f AL— A Classic American Neighborhood s.toinnhai y- Diversity Ernlogy- (enneniuity DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC . Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: oEMANESTWMPANY tm N-M1i- tmd Pknnn ASLI min9lon. NC 3¢Cit 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 PROJECT"LE A IE A R E S T P O I N T E EXISTING FENCE ■ ■ ■^ NEW FENCE TREE SPADED TREE BUFFER (.68 AC) 30,000 SQ FT Pav o�rpuon oea ovm cim DWG TITLE FENCING AND BUFFER PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: w�( 34 �TEO 1`$ TA , v Dear v�" REF. NO. DAT 3128120 E: DRAWN: SDS CHECKED: SDS DRAWING SCALE:NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. e.Ma 21 —ERIED ww-II r61 170* '►: i w I� 0,0 a q 1 r Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 23 1 - sY - "'— A - r - - d t1 �j d NTE A Classic American Neighborhood 5 ustainnhili ly.Dive rsi ty.Eml ngy- (annectivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMM STMMPANY t d— k,6iiens Iund Plsso ASA min0mn. NG3e<11 9 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 DoE MTA R E S T P O I N T E .72 ACRES STORMWATER EASEMENT 3.35 ACRES CONDITIONAL i R -5 REZONING '--------------------------- 4.07 ACRES PROVIDED FOR IMPROVEMENTS Pr,� o.aequm oem oYm cim DWG TITLE TREE SURVEY EXISTING CONDITIONS GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: pq!( vr 0.ru1 p*' REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NITS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. -11RI-Ts.. 22 RMERIED 4'. 4 i r >' I1 T .� »L,,.�, ie ,fir �► .. I l I .y4 f r ,f N /1� I u NA�ri1 + a 1� s.T 1 r . e Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 24 A- t, r ;I n. iI A Classic American Neighborhood Susto nobl -ty- Diversity- Emlegy-Connenivity PROJECT NO.: DEVELOPER: Middlesound LLC 6933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR: Atlantic 1:1111 ,1111y 1200 N 23rd Street, Suite 107 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING: CDS Engineering 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DEMMSTCeMraaY I. a-enem twdPk- ASU 69]3 ftunnin mnW 11-11 91 BUILDER PBCDESIGN +BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington North Carolina 28401 CT T OE IIYft.E III I rvD O TOTAL EXISTING TREES (2 " -20" DBH) + 795 Trees Perimeter Buffer ^ + 90 Trees Site Interior 100% = 846 Trees 5/ - 45 Trees Removed 95% 801 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES (8 " -24" DBH) V& +102 Trees Perimeter Buffer 'Ib + 80 Trees Site Interior 100% = 182 Trees 25% 45 Trees Removed 75% 137 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES TO TREE SPADE OTrees To Be Tree Spade 100% + 137 Trees To Remain 7 - 10 Trees To Be Tree Spade 93% 127 Trees To Remain DWG TITLE TREE SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: wC( 34 �WSC yo TA ro'+ g•: R REF. NO. DATE: 3128120 DRAWN:SDS CHECKED: SIDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. 1111111"T 23 aaaa J f Al All Y I Fi s 40F R 1 ` s, A . <C ♦ r- . r r ♦iy K{ 4 All r ! + yy � + T �, '►,. ,a�,r rr f yl,t •'�, r � � � .. iyr�' �� ti �f `moo +i' '» " C. 1 • 1 11 f e 'f ,I � � ►i" rat �_ ��; .r ,`;'. r ♦ 9 t Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 25�_ J _ rt A Classic American Neighborhood 5 sto no6lly Diversity Ecology [onnenivlry DEVELOPER M ddlesound ILC 5933 Runn ng 8ro0k Terrace W lminglon North Carorna 28411 SURVEYOR Atlantic Coast Survey 1200 N 23rd Street Sute 107 Wilmington North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING CDS Eng neer ng 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DRAWING NO. rvel OEMARESTCNMPANY ConlonA"M1'tle,h load vbers 6933R T.— WAKA BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilhimsi North Carolina 28401 ro CCMTa R E T I D I N T S N TOTAL EXISTING TREES (2 " -20" DBH) + 795 Trees Perimeter Buffer + 90 Trees Site Interior 100% = 846 Trees 5/ - 45 Trees Removed 95% 801 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES (8 " -24" DBH) +102 Trees Perimeter Buffer + 80 Trees Site Interior 100% = 182 Trees 25% 45 Trees Removed 75% 137 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES TO TREE SPADE OTrees To Be Tree Spade 100% + 137 Trees To Remain 7 • 10 Trees To Be Tree Spade 93% 127 Trees To Remain 7ITLE TREE SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: as- t y yA. ~: h REF. NO. DATE: 3128/20$ DRAWN: SOS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. rvel 24 "- Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 16 - 26 4V Roc! .•r1� i {S t k'ri- ol y I i -•.d ie. r. �, •yti J 1 A 1. 04 j jr. t • ! '4" `.. 1. • � star 71� • M A Classic American Neighborhood suslulnaNfilV Diversify Ec logY'connerfivlry DEVELOPER: Middlesound ILC 5933 Running Brook Terrace Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 SURVEYOR Atlantic Coas[ Survey 1200 N 23rd street Su to 107 Wilmington North Carolina 28405 CIVIL ENGINEERING CDs Eng nee. mg 3805 Cherry Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: DRAWING NO. Ya,e 25 tojeA,dhAft OEMASESTCNMPANY . load Vk��m Aun BUILDER DESIGN BUILD 314 Walnut Street Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 T vD A I T II.R.c o f II ua I A c.., o "= TOTAL EXISTING TREES (2 " -20" DBH) + 795 Trees Perimeter Buffer + 90 Trees Site Interior 100% = 846 Trees 5/ - 45 Trees Removed 95% 801 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES (8 " -24" DBH) +102 Trees Perimeter Buffer + 80 Trees Site Interior 100% = 182 Trees 25% 45 Trees Removed 75% 137 Trees To Remain TOTAL PROTECTED TREES TO TREE SPADE OTrees To Be Tree Spade 100% + 137 Trees To Remain 7 • 10 Trees To Be Tree Spade 93% 127 Trees To Remain DWG TITLE TREE SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE: APPROXIMATE PROJECT NO.: 'GARS Q- vrIas- t y � TA. ~: h REF. No. DATE: 3128/20$ DRAWN: SDS CHECKED:SDS DRAWING SCALE: NTS CHECKED: DRAWING NO. Ya,e 25 esea OPPOSITION MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 17 - 1 Memorandum TO: Middle Sound Lookout FROM: Lawrence Green, PE, PTOE (NC PE License #028137, PTOE License #4400) DATE: June 3, 2020 SUBJECT: Demarest Pointe - Site Transportation Evaluation The purpose of this memorandum is to prepare a site traffic analysis of a proposed rezoning of a 3.38 acre residentially zoned property within New Hanover County. The site is currently zoned R20 which will allow the construction of 6 Single Family Detached Dwelling Units on the site. A developer is proposing to rezone the property to R5 and is proposing the construction of 24 Low -Rise Multi - family Housing Units. Access to the site is provided from one (1) right -in only driveway along Middle Sound Loop Road (the east leg of the Middle Sound Loop Road /Darden Road roundabout). Access from the site is provided from one (1) right -out only driveway along Middle Sound Loop Road (the south leg of the Middle Sound Loop Road /Darden Road roundabout). TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON A trip generation comparison was conducted to determine the difference between AM peak hour, PM peak hour, and daily trips that would be generated by the site under the current zoning and the proposed zoning. The results are shown in the table below using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition for Daily, AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour Trips. Existing Development Trip Generation vs. Proposed Development Trip Generation Land Use Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips 6 Single Family Detached 57 4 6 (ITE Land Use 210) 24 Multi - Family - Low- 141 12 17 Rise (ITE Land Use 220) Based upon an examination of the trip generation comparison, the proposed rezoning will generate 84 more Daily Trips (a 147% increase), will generate 8 more AM Peak Hour Trips (a 200% increase), and will generate 11 more PM Peak Hour Trips (a 183% increase). Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 - 18 - 1 Memorandum ROUNDABOUT LEVEL OF SERVICE On February 1, 2018, the North Carolina Department of Transportation conducted a level of service (LOS) assessment at the SR 1403 (Middle Sound Loop Road) at SR 1407 (Darden Road) roundabout using the Sidra Intersection roundabout evaluation software. The study focused on the AM and PM peak hours at the roundabout. The results of the evaluation indicated that the westbound Middle Sound Loop Road approach was operating at a LOS "D" during the AM peak hour. The study determined that "the overall v/c (volume to capacity ratio) exceeds 0.85 which indicates that the roundabout is approaching capacity during the AM peak hour." It should also be noted that the traffic data utilized to determine the levels of service at the roundabout were collected on Tuesday, December 12, 2017. Based upon an examination of seasonal variations, December traffic data is significantly below the average month of traffic activity. The NCDOT has projected that traffic will increase by an average of 2% per year at the roundabout. However, based upon an examination of the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization traffic data, traffic volumes on Middle Sound Loop Road between Market Street and Darden Road increased by nearly 30% between 2017 and 2019. Therefore, based upon the projected annual traffic growth that would increase traffic volumes from 2017 to 2020; and the fact that the analyses were based upon a lower than average data collection month; the roundabout can be expected to further approach capacity and could potentially exceed capacity once traffic patterns return to pre - pandemic conditions. OGDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAFFIC ACTIVITY Access for non -bus traffic is provided via one (1) inbound only site access driveway and one (1) right -out only driveway on Middle Sound Loop Road (the west leg of the Middle Sound Loop Road /Darden Road roundabout). Access for bus traffic is provided via one (1) full movement site access driveway on Middle Sound Loop Road (the south leg of the Middle Sound Loop Road /Darden Road roundabout). The single exit point for the proposed Demarest Pointe residential development is 75 feet to the north -west of the existing bus access on Middle Sound Loop Road. Based upon recorded observations of traffic activity surrounding the school over the last few years, traffic queues frequently extend beyond the bus access point on Middle Sound Loop Road from the roundabout during the morning peak period. Therefore, the traffic queues will extend Page 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -18-2 Memorandum beyond the proposed exit point for Demarest Pointe as well. Based upon observations in the field, vehicles /buses can only gain access to Middle Sound Loop Road via the courtesy of queued drivers along this roadway. The proposed rezoning will only add to this current congestion problem near the school. US 17 (MARKET STREET) AT MIDDLE SOUND LOOP ROAD The Market Street at Middle Sound Loop Road intersection operates with a cycle length of 304 seconds during the 1:30 — 6:40 PM time period. This cycle length is double the length of the vast majority of the 228 traffic signals within the Wilmington Traffic Signal System. Because of the very long cycle length and congested activity on Market Street, delays to /from Middle Sound Loop Road are very long currently. The traffic impact study conducted for the Middlesound West development determined that the 2019 delays along westbound Middle Sound Loop Road are 149.2 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour (LOS "F"). The congested activity will be further exacerbated with the proposed rezoning since this intersection will be utilized by most of the traffic generated by Demarest Pointe. CRASH ACTIVITY The NCDOT provided crash data along Middle Sound Loop Road from Market Street to Darden Road. Middle Sound Loop Road is generally at two -lane roadway with a speed limit of 35 MPH. The crash statistics revealed that a total of 239 crashes occurred along this stretch of roadway from 2010 to 2020 (including 3 fatalities). The section of roadway had a Severity Index of 4.37 which is above average for NC Urban Routes (Source: NCDOT Transportation Mobility and Safety Division 2015 -2017 Crash Data). A higher severity index correlates to a higher number of injuries per crash along the roadway. As indicated above, this stretch of roadway will be used by most of all traffic generated by Demarest Pointe. While an exact estimate of increased crash activity with higher traffic volumes cannot be definitively stated, higher traffic volumes on roadways typically correlate with higher crash activity. Page 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 7 -18-3 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler, Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing NOTE: Petitioner Withdrew the Item Rezoning Request (Z19 -12) — Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, Raiford G. Trask Jr. Rev Trust, to Rezone Approximately 10.35 Acres of Land Located North of the 3300 Block of Paramount Way in the Northchase Planned Development, and South of Interstate 140, from O &I, Office and Institutional District, and R- 15 Residential District, to R -5, Moderate -High Residential District BRIEF SUMMARY: At their March 9 meeting, the Board of Commissioners continued this item to their May 4 meeting. The item was not considered at the May or June meetings due to the COVID -19 situation. The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 10.35 acres from 0 &1 and R -15 to R -5. The site is located between the Northchase Planned Development and 1 -140. The property is currently split zoned. About 6.9 acres is zoned 0 &1 and 3.4 acres is zoned R -15. The 0 &1 district permits office and institutional related uses (like medical and professional offices, religious institutions, and schools) and low density residential housing (maximum of 2.5 du /ac). The current zoning of the property would allow up to 26 dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre if the full site was developed with residential uses. The proposed R -5 district would allow up to 83 dwelling units at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. Alternatively, it is estimated that 0 &1 zoned portion of the property could support about 150,000 square feet of office related uses, based on a typical 25% building area and 2 -story building(s). Although that amount of office space is theoretically possible on a 7 -acre site, it is not practical to expect the market would support facilities that large, or even a smaller size, at this location due to the access limitation of 1- 140 leaving the only current road connection to the site through the residential portion of Northchase. Because this is a general map amendment and not a conditional rezoning, uses that would be allowed on the property are those allowed by right or by Special Use Permit in the R -5 district. A conceptual site plan is not included with this application, however, if approved, the development of the site must comply with the standards of the R -5 district and other applicable regulations, including buffering and stormwater standards. The only current access to the site is through Northchase, specifically from Chandler Drive. This road then connects to Northchase Parkway which connects to N. College Road at two signalized intersections. The majority of the roadway network within Northchase, including the above routes, is maintained by NCDOT. The combination of single - family homes and office uses currently permitted by the existing zoning would be expected to generate more traffic than a townhouse development under the proposed zoning. A development consisting of 83 townhomes would generate about 40 -50 trips in the peak hours. A general office building consisting of 20,000 square feet would generate about the same amount of trips during the AM peak hour. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 The site is located adjacent a major roadway (1 -140) and attached housing like quadplexes, triplexes, and duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between major roads and single - family neighborhoods. While the existing zoning, 0&1, is also an appropriate transition, the limited access through Northchase makes moderate density residential housing a more logical development pattern which will generally generate less traffic than nonresidential uses. The subject site is classified as General Residential in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed R -5 zoning district is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area. The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, an attorney representing the Northchase Homeowners Association and several residents expressed their opposition to the rezoning request presenting concerns about increased traffic, poor drainage, known flooding in storm events, overcrowded schools, and the right to use Chandler Drive as an access. The Planning Board voted 3 -3 on the following motion to deny the request: I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. The applicant has elected to appeal the Planning Board's recommendation and have the application considered by the Board of Commissioners. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations forthe adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 adjacent neighborhoods. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval as presented by staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: None, the item was withdrawn by the petitioner. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 SCRIPT for Zoning Map Amendment Application (Z19 -12) Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Raiford G. Trask Jr. Rev Trust, to rezone approximately 10.35 acres of land located north of the 3300 block of Paramount Way in the Northchase Planned Development, and south of Interstate 140, from O &I, Office and Institutional District, and R -15 Residential District, to R -5, Moderate -High Residential District. 1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Staff Suaaested Motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 1 - 1 Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z19 -12 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z19 -1 2 Request: Rezoning to a R -5 Moderate -High Residential District Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Raiford G. Trask Jr. Location: Acreage: North of the Northchase Planned Development, near the 10.35 intersection of Chandler Drive and Paramount Way PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R02600- 003 - 010 -000 General Residential Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: The property would be allowed to Undeveloped be developed in accordance with the R -5 district Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: 0&1 and R -15 R -5 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North 1 -140 1 -1, R -15 East Single- Family Residential PD ( Northchase) Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 1 Page 1 of 15 South Single - Family Residential PD (Northchase) West Undeveloped, 1 -140 PD, 1 -1 ZONING HISTORY July 7, 1972 Initially zoned R -15 (Area 8B) August 3, 1998 The western portion of the property rezoned to 0&1 (Z -630). COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer CFPUA water and sewer service would require main line extension. Specific Historic design will be determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Murrayville *Schools Castle Hayne Elementary, Trask Middle, and Laney High Schools *For more information, see the full School statistics below. Recreation Blue Clay Park, Northern Regional Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 2 Page 2 of 15 ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 10.35 acres from 0&1 and R -15 to R -5. • The property is currently split zoned. About 6.9 acres is zoned 0&1 and 3.4 acres is zoned R -15. The 0&1 district permits office and institutional related uses (like medical and professional offices, religious institutions, and schools) and low density residential housing (maximum of 2.5 du /ac). • The current zoning of the property would allow up to 26 dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre if the full site was developed with residential uses. The proposed R -5 district would allow up to 83 dwelling units at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. Alternatively, it is estimated that 0&1 zoned portion of the property could support about 150,000 square feet of office related uses, based on a typical 25% building area and 2 -story building(s). Although that amount of office space is theoretically possible on a 7 -acre site, it is not practical to expect the market would support facilities that large, if at all, at this location due to the access limitation of 1 -140 leaving the only current road connection to the site through the residential portion of Northchase. • The R -5 district allows duplexes, triplexes, quadruplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units. However, the district prohibits mobile homes and typical multi - family development, like apartments, allowing a maximum of 4 units within any residential structure. In addition, the special use permit for high density developments is not permitted in the R -5 district, and the number of permitted nonresidential uses is reduced. • If townhomes are developed, a minimum 20 -foot buffer is required around the southeastern property line of the project because the proposed development is adjacent to single - family dwellings within Northchase. In addition, the townhome units will be restricted to a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the same standard applied in the R -15 district, and more restrictive than the 40 -foot height maximum applied in the 0&1 district. Compliance with Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 3 Page 3 of 15 Existing Zoning Proposed R -5 R -15 (approx 3.4 0&1 (approx 6.9 acres) acres) Min Lot Size 15,000 sf 15,000 sf 5,000 sf (Conventional) 2.5 du /ac 2.5 du /ac (Performance) (Performance) Max Density 10.2 du /ac 10.2 du /ac 8 du /ac (High Density SUP) (High Density SUP) Max Dwelling 9 (Performance) 17 (Performance) Units for Subject 35 (High Density 70 (High Density 83 Property SUP) SUP) Limited (ex. Variety of office , Limited (ex. Commercial Kennels, institutional and recreation, Uses recreation and medical related day care, convenience stores parks, W/ SUP) uses. libraries) • The R -5 district allows duplexes, triplexes, quadruplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units. However, the district prohibits mobile homes and typical multi - family development, like apartments, allowing a maximum of 4 units within any residential structure. In addition, the special use permit for high density developments is not permitted in the R -5 district, and the number of permitted nonresidential uses is reduced. • If townhomes are developed, a minimum 20 -foot buffer is required around the southeastern property line of the project because the proposed development is adjacent to single - family dwellings within Northchase. In addition, the townhome units will be restricted to a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the same standard applied in the R -15 district, and more restrictive than the 40 -foot height maximum applied in the 0&1 district. Compliance with Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 3 Page 3 of 15 these provisions will be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee during the subdivision review process. • Because this is a general map amendment and not a conditional rezoning, uses that would be allowed on the property are those allowed by right or by Special Use Permit in the R -5 district. A conceptual site plan is not included with this application, however, if approved, the development of the site must comply with the standards of the R -5 district and other applicable regulations, including buffering and stormwater standards. • The adjacent portion of Northchase east of the site has a history of flooding due to the area's topography and marginal drainage system. It is possible existing homes in this portion of Northchase have finished floor elevations below a 100 -year flood elevation. Over 100 homes sustained flood damage during Hurricane Florence, which was a 500 to 1000 -year storm event that totaled over 30 inches of rain. • The downstream outfall for this area flows north and crosses 1 -140, Blue Clay Road, and N. College Road eventually draining to Prince George Creek. F s. v General Direction J of Drainage Flow 1-140 u TIVERTON CCItlDNG�INGT TC)N S�bjed Site o � � o f . N�aSµC�ypSE Downstream Outfall • The County was recently awarded a grant to remove debris and sedimentation from streams and waterways impacted by Hurricane Florence in the unincorporated areas of the County. The County is also seeking additional funding to increase the capacity of the drainage system serving the site and the Board of Commissioners recently voted to establish a stormwater service aimed at assisting with the maintenance and improvement of the drainage features within the County. The stormwater service will become effective in July 2021. • While the area contains drainage challenges, a rezoning from 0&1 to R -5 is generally considered to be a down zoning in that the permitted uses in a residential district are less intense and typically generate less impervious coverage and traffic. Further the site must be designed to comply with the County's stormwater standards regardless of the zoning district it is developed under. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Page 4 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 4 AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION The only current access is to the site is through Northchase, specifically from Chandler Drive. This road then connects to Northchase Parkway which connects to N. College Road at two signalized intersections. The majority of the roadway network within Northchase, including the above routes, is maintained by NCDOT. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Page 5 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 5 � 1 19 -12 Chandler Dr Northchase Pwkw W New Village Subject Site . E3, i 3 r, Signalized _ �s;,,cn» nYe €section wj N. College Road a1 Signalized Intersection w/ Iii. College Road NNCDOT Maintained Roads Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 6 Page 6 of 15 • At the Planning Board meeting, residents expressed concerns regarding the legal access to Chandler Drive from the subject property. The final plat stub for that section of Northchase, recorded in 1995, did not expressly label the road stub to be a right -of -way (instead labeling it as "Future Development "). However, County staff has historically interpreted the plat to designate that area as a future road that would extend north to provide access to the adjacent property. The road stub is currently not within a tax parcel, indicating it was not intended to be a residential lot, and the Master Plan for the abutting Blue Clay Farms Planned Development (approved by the Board of Commissioners) showed a proposed access easement from the subject site to Chandler Drive. In addition, the width of the stub is the same dimension (50 feet) as the right -of -way of Chandler Drive. Undeveloped Open Space of Blue Clay Farm ** -,O� .0 d V " o F Subject Site Access Easement ,# Residertial,f Office/ Commercial of Blue Clay Farms '< Z r North chase Master Plan of the Blue Clay Farms Planned Development illustrating proposed access to the subject site from Chandler Drive Z1 9-12 Staff Report BOC 7.1 3.2020 Page 7 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 7 Typically, single - family dwellings generate approximately one trip in the peak hours, while townhomes generate approximately 0.5 trips in the peak hours. The combination of single - family homes and office uses currently permitted by the existing zoning would be expected to generate more traffic than a townhouse development under the proposed zoning. A development consisting of 83 townhomes would generate about 40 -50 trips in the peak hours. A general office building consisting of 20,000 square feet would generate about the same amount of trips during the AM peak hour. Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Traffic Impact Analyses Q o o `t 1 Mile Radius Approvedo a z lSR i Under Review 9ksOMsti F, SIDa tt �- Under Draft - Pumpkin Creek C Store TIA Approved o / x Cape Landing TIA Approved y s ©� g� �' _ t o o TIVERTON - n Z19 -12 `$ o HEMLOCK � rFr f�ti� rr HOCLY yo 3 tv Y STIP Project Miles lT' 0 0.25 0.5 F Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 8 Page 8 of 15 There have not been any recent Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA) in the area that provide data on intersections along N. College Road adjacent to Northchase, however, a 2017 TIA completed for the Cape Landing subdivision estimated that the intersection of N. College Road and Blue Clay Road would operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) in 2021 when that development is expected to be completed. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Development Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 1. Pumpkin Creek • 5,000 sf Convenience • Approved February 3, 2018 Convenience Store Market with Gas Pumps • 2018 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Extension of the existing eastbound left turn lane on Blue Clay Road at N. College Road. • Extension of the existing southbound left turn lane on N. College Road at Blue Clay Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Phase 1 of the Cape Fear Community College expansion. Development Status: No construction has started at this time. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 9 Page 9 of 15 • Approved December 21, 2. Cape Landing • 126 Single - Family Dwellings 2017 • 2021 Build Out Year The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Extension of the existing eastbound left turn lane on Blue Clay Road at N. College Road. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Phase 1 of the Cape Fear Community College expansion. Development Status: 62 lots have been platted, most of which now contain occupied single - family dwellings. The extension of the turn lane has not been completed at this time and is required to be installed with the second phase of the development unless it is installed by the Pumpkin Creek convenience store first. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 9 Page 9 of 15 SCHOOLS • Students generated from this development would be assigned to Castle Hayne Elementary, Trask Middle, and Laney High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year - round elementary, or specialty high schools. • Twenty -six dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -15 and 0&1 zoning base density, and 83 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 57 dwelling units • Based on average student generation rates *, there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 19.9 (8.9 elementary, 4.5 middle, and 6.5 high), which is 13.7 more students than if developed under existing zoning. Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0 Typical Development 26 residential units Total: 6.2 under Current Zoning of Assigned (2.8 elementary, 1.4 middle, 2.0 high) Proposed Development Capacity Total: 19.9 under Proposed (CZD) R- 83 residential units (8.9 elementary, 4.5 middle, 6.5 high) 5 Zoning of Assigned Upgrades *Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes students attending out -of- district specialty schools, such as year -round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and Sea TECH. School Enrollment* and Capacity * * - 2021 -2022 Estimates *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 10 Page 10 of 15 Total Enrollment Capacity of % of Funded Level NHC % School of Assigned Assigned Capacity Capacity Capacity School School w/ of Assigned Upgrades Portables School Elementary 97% Castle Hayne 483 529 91% None Middle 107% Trask 717 662 108% None High 105% Laney 2063 1903 108% None *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 10 Page 10 of 15 "Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property is not within a Natural Heritage Area or Special Flood Hazard Area. • The property is within the Prince George Creek (C;Sw) watershed. • Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class II (moderate limitation) and Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, CFPUA sewer services is available with main line extension. CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY • Attached homes like quadplexes, triplexes, and duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between major roads like Interstate 140 and single - family neighborhoods. • Townhomes tend to generate less traffic per unit than traditional single - family homes because they are often occupied by smaller households (retirees or young adults without children). • The existing 0&1 zoning that makes up most of the site is also a common transitional zoning district between major roads and single - family neighborhoods. However, due to the limited access through the Northchase area, moderate residential density allowed by the proposed zoning is a more logical transition in this area. Representative Developments of R -5: Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 2 - 11 Plantation Landing Page 11 of 15 JJ ► fs Yk - tao loe, Marsh Oaks Representative Developments of Northchase: ss W Paramount Way Paramount Way Z1 9-12 Staff Report 130C 7.1 3.2020 Page 12 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -2-12 �t 4 A Iw b a ,. , F a F s 4 � !ti d ii Y• fY !' i 1 � f �Y•..A w Northchase 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Ab w Y k r The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z1 9-12 Staff Report BOC 7.1 3.2020 Page 13 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -2-13 Future Land Use General Residential Map Place Type Focuses on lower- density housing and associated civic and commercial Place Type services. Typically, housing is single - family or duplexes. Commercial uses Description should be limited to strategically located office and retail spaces, while recreation and school facilities are encouraged throughout. The subject site is designated as General Residential, the intent of which is to preserve existing residential neighborhoods and provide opportunities for similar lower density residential development and supportive commercial, civic, and recreational development. Because of the general nature of place type borders, sites located in proximity to the boundaries between place types could be appropriately developed in accordance with either place type. This site is transitional, located between the residential portion of the Northchase planned development and the 1 -140 Bypass and immediately adjacent to vacant land designated as a Community Mixed Use place type. Given its place type designation and proximity to Community Mixed Use, Analysis the type of office and commercial development allowed in the current 0&1 zoning designation could be appropriate; however, because it can only currently be accessed by Chandler Dr., residential uses would be more compatible with the existing development pattern. The proposed R -5 zoning district allows a maximum slightly higher than the 6 unit per acre density identified as preferable in General Residential areas, but the limited residential developments allowed in the district are more aligned with the intent of a General Residential place than the types of nonresidential uses and large multifamily buildings allowed in 0&1. In addition, the maximum 8 units per acre allowed in R -5 is in line with the adjacent Community Mixed Use place type and the moderate density preferred for planned developments in a General Residential area. The proposed R -5 zoning district is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it would provide an orderly transition between Consistency the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, Recommendation promotes more diverse housing options, and is in -line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area. Z19 -1 2 Staff Report BOC 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -2-14 Page 14 of 15 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their January 9, 2020 meeting. At the meeting, an attorney representing the Northchase Homeowners Association and several residents expressed their opposition to the rezoning request presenting concerns about increased traffic through the community, poor drainage, known flooding in storm events, overcrowded schools, and the right to use Chandler Drive as an access. The Planning Board voted 3 -3 on the following motion to deny the request: I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. The applicant has elected to appeal the Planning Board's recommendation and have the application considered by the Board of Commissioners. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in- line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal would provide an orderly transition between the existing single - family residential neighborhoods and Interstate 140, promotes more diverse housing options, and is in line with the density recommendations for the adjacent Community Mixed Use area and for planned developments in a General Residential area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z1 9-12 Staff Report BOC 7.1 3.2020 Page 15 of 15 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -2-15 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use /Zoning_ Z19 -12 3900/4000 block R -15 and O &I/ R -5 Chandler Dr Undeveloped N i W•1 -140 Py�O E-1-140 R -15 , Subject Site R -10 ♦ ♦ .i ♦' 96'l' O COHAN'C�R �O Z -2 ��Py.• ` oo ' r CI 750 Feet Bo of p'ers - 1 8 -1 Water Sewer Zoning Districts ?� A -I EDZD M PD R -20S SC �o AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7 B -1 1 -2 R -15 RA B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU D ® Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Incorporated Areas IL SHOD Case: Site Address: Z19 -12 3900/4000 block Chandler Dr COMMUNITY MIXED USES 750 Existing Zoning /Use: R -15 and 0&1/ Undeveloped Proposed Use /Zoning_ R -5 N Subject Site yaPy EMPLOYMENT 2 CENTER a GENERAL VICPR' RESIDENTIAL —11 Place Types COMMERCE ZONE o; EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE D COMMUNITY MIXED USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL 2\ CONSERVATION 4.11 ,, .. x Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning /Use: Proposed Use /Zoning_ Z19 -12 3900/4000 block R -15 and O &I/ R -5 Chandler Dr Undeveloped N R -15 O &I 4220 1 -2 y99 �1 • / 0.0 i Subject Site o R-10_ Ire 4201 • 3448 3450 3446 . 3 449 • • 3444 , 3445 PD %3443 • 3347 3345 •3341 /343439 Z: :3 50 y opt 3343 3348 V 3341y • 3337 • 3340 • 3344 2 • 3336 • �/.3333 • `l 3332 �^ 3329 3328 3 w 3I n 376 • 3369 d 3324 3365 -� CT 3321 • •\ 3317 y • 3320 3361 VlCpR •v • 3313/ 3316 3 y • 3357 •� •3309 • 3312 3317 >/ ,�� G. :305 :308 •3313 • 3316�(F y 3304 :301//• 3309 L� ��� CO 4001 3239/• 300 3305\ �\ • ?J`) 32 5 , 4000 1 +/ •01 • 322 3304 3217 • y 4004 • 4008 4009 >1 •Qk•9/ 3213 • 4012 '55 � �� �l •05 'y 2 750 ��o�- 3 12 — :909 Feet j P�o of sio$ers - 1 13, 2��6pa� OOOOO�aMON n ��O APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY o �= PLANNING & LAND USE r z K F T C �. =2 Application for ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Print Form 230 Government Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910 - 798 -7165 phone 910- 798 -7053 fax www.nhcgov.com Petitioner Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property If different than Petitioner Name Owner Name Address CINDEE WOLF RAIFORD G TRASK, JR REV TRUST CHANDLER DR Company Owner Name 2 Parcel ID(s) DESIGN SOLUTIONS RAIFORD G TRASK, JR - TRUSTEE 323007.67.5839 Address Address Area PO BOX 7221 6336 OLEANDER DR, STE 1 10.35 AC +/- City, State, Zip City, State, Zip Existing Zoning and Use WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 0&1 AND R -15 / VACANT Phone Phone Proposed Zoning and Use 910- 620 -2374 910- 799 -8755 R -5 / RESIDENTIAL Email Email Land Classification CWOLF @LOBODEMAR.BIZ RAIFORD@TRASKLANDCO.COM GENERAL RESIDENTIAL Application Tracking Information (Stqf f Case Number Date/Time received: Received by: 211 -IZ a0r) S APPLICATION OVERVIEW In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a pre - application conference prior to application submittal. Petitioners are requested to review the sections of the Zoning Ordinance specific to zoning amendments prior to submission, and advised to contact Planning Staff with any questions. The following sections of the Zoning Ordinance pertain specifically to zoning amendments: Section 110: Amending the Ordinance Section 1 11: Petitions Section 112: Approval. Process Applications for zoning amendments must first be considered by the New Hanover County Planning Board at a public hearing. The Planning Board will make a recommendation to the County Commissioners which will take final action on the permit application in a quasi-judicial public hearing. Attendance at all public hearings is required. The public hearings will allow staff, the applicant, proponents and opponents to testify in regards to the request. Unless otherwise published or announced, Planning Board meetings are held on the first Thursday of each month at 6:OOPM in the Commissioner's Assembly Room at the Historic County Courthouse located at Third and Princess Streets, Wilmington, North Carolina. All meeting dates and application deadlines are published on the New Hanover County Planning website. Page 1 of 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 04/14 ITEM: 8 - 7 - 1 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS In order to assist petitioners through the rezoning process, petitioners are highly encouraged to attend a pre - application conference prior to application submittal. Applications must be reviewed by Planning Staff for completeness prior to being officially accepted. Applications must be submitted to Planning Staff at least twenty (20) working days before the Planning Board meeting at which the application is to be considered. In order to allow time to process, fees and review for completeness, applications will not be accepted after 5:00 PM on the deadline day. Once accepted, the Planning Board will consider the application at the assigned meeting unless the applicant requests a continuance. For all proposals, in addition to this application, the following supplemental information and materials are required: Required Information Applicant Initial Staff Initial Copy of the New Hanover County Tax Map, which delineates the property requested for rezoning. CAWS Legal description (by metes and bounds) of property requested for rezoning. CAW J Copy of the subdivision map or recorded plat which delineates the property. CAW, 5 Any special requirements of the Ordinance (for example, Section 54.2 for Planned Development District, Section 54.1 for Exceptional Design Zoning District, or Section 54.3 for Riverfront Mixed Use District) N/A A report of the required public information meeting outlined in Section 111 -2.1 (if applicable) N/A �, JA Authority for Appointment of Agent Form (if applicable) CAW 5 Fee - For petitions involving 5 acres or less, $500. For petitions involving greater than 5 acres, $600 �Z C CAW CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONING Requests for general rezonings do not consider a particular land use but rather all of the uses permitted in the zoning district which is being requested for the subject property. Rezoning requests must be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, and the applicant has the burden of proving that the request is not consistent with the county's adopted land use plan, zoning ordinance, reasonable, and in the public's interest. The applicant should explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed zoning district satisfies these requirements. The applicant has the burden of proof and must provide sufficient evidence in order for the required findings to be met. You must explain in the space below how your request satisfies each of the following requirements (attach additional sheets if necessary): i. now wouid the requested change be consistent with the County's Policies for Growth and Development? he policies for growth and development encourage safe and affordable housing to be available to every citizen. Sustainability if the County depends on sensible in -fill and maximizing use of lands already accessible to urban services. More density of ingle- family development not only increases tax base, but makes better use of the existing infrastructure. Page 2 of 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 04/14 ITEM: 8 - 7 - 2 2. How would the requested zone change be consistent with the property's classification on the Land C;lassitication his tract is defined as a place -type of General Residential on the Comprehensive Plan, but is bordered by an interstate highway nd adjacent to both Urban and Community Mixed -Use place- types. Although the overlying designation suggests an ideal ensity of 1 -6 units per acre, the slightly higher density of 8 units per acre allowed within an R -5 district would be consistent with �ansitioning between busy highway corridors and more the more established residential neighborhoods in NorthChase. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? he tract is currently split -zoned by an O &I, office & institutional, district and an R -15, residential district. However, the only ccess is through the NorthChase neighborhood streets - which is not convenient for the commercial uses customarily eveloped in that zone. Rezoning the entire tract to R -5 for a higher density, but 100% residential, development would Itimately create less vehicular trip generation than many of the alternative uses allowed in the current district. 4. How will this change of zoning serve the public interest? The Comprehensive Plan promotes fostering sustainable growth through sensible infill where adequate services are already available. Allowing increased density on this property will improve the form and function of an underutilized site, maximize land use efficiency, and is a good economic development opportunity. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the zoning district for which I am applying. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. OgvL � A Wo-Gf- 08130119 CYNTHIA A WOLF Signature of Petitioner and /or Property Owner Print Name Board of Comr}►islopgfp3 July 13, 2020 ITEICrI 8 - 7 - 3 04/14 NEW HANOVER COUNTY ti a ;J PLANNING & LAND USE — o AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT Print Form 230 Govermnent Center Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910- 798 -7165 phone 910 - 798 -7053 fax www.nhcgov.com Please note that for quasi - judicial proceedings, either the land owner or an attorney must be present for the case at the public hearing. The undersigned owner does hereby appoint an authorized the agent described herein as their exclusive agent for the purpose of petitioning New Hanover County for a variance, special use pennit, rezoning request, and/or an appeal of Staff decisions applicable to the property described in the attached petition. The Agent is hereby authorized to, on behalf of the property owner: 1. Submit a proper petition and the required supplemental information and materials 2. Appeal at public meetings to give representation and commitments on behalf of the property owner 3. Act on the property owner's behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of any petition applicable to the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Agent Information Property Owner(s) Subject Property Name Owner Name Address CINDEE WOLF RAIFORD G TRASK, JR REV TRUST CHANDLER DR Company Owner Name 2 City, State, Zip DESIGN SOLUTIONS RAIFORD G TRASK, JR - TRUSTEE WILMINGTON, INC 28411 Address Address Parcel ID PO BOX 7221 6336 OLEANDER DR, STE 1 323007.67.5839 City, State, Zip City, State, Zip WILMINGTON, INC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Phone Phone 910 -620 -2374 910- 799 -8755 Email Email CWOLF @LOBODEMAR.BIZ MADISON @TRASKLANDCO.COM Application Tracking Information (Staff Only) Case Number Reference: Date/Time received: Received by: This document was willfully executed on the day of RL,�tt I , 20 J Owner Signature 09/14 R -15 n/f Daniel Webster Trask Revocable Trust etal D.B. 6026 -2780 h� h Zoning: PD / Land Use: Vacant MN --s O "0 C CY J C N 47 °46'44" E 1 -140 / U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass N 49 °43'34" E 533.81' AY W S,38 °22' Regency Manor 56 Section 4 57 58 MB 34/249 mount V�ay a Graphic Scale 50 100 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 S V 10 -35 ac -± (Public R /W) N 50 °56'26" E 47.45' 1 12.35' N 50 °56'23" E 293.48' R= 2673.88' L= 231.65' N 56°59'10" E CH- '231.58' 1� IS �' n/f Land, /91 LLC etal D.B. 5699 -1709 General Notes: 1. New Hanover County Parcel No.: PIN 323007.67.5839 [PID 2600- 003 - 010 -000] 2. Total Tract Area: 10.35 ac.± 3. Existing Zoning District: R -15 & 0&1 w/ S.H.O.D. over U.S. Hwy. 17 Bypass 4. CAMA Plan Land Classification: Limited Transition 5. Comprehensive Plan Place- types: Community Mixed -Use & General Residential 6. This property is not within a Special Flood Hazard Zone as evidenced on FEMA Map 3720323000K dated August 28, 2018. Rezoning Boundary Exhibit Property of Raiford G. Trask, Jr. Revocable Trust Cape Fear Township / New Hanover County / North Carolina Legal Description for Rezoning Beginning at a point located North 38 022'42" East, 30.26 feet from a point at the end of the northeastern boundary of Chandler Drive (NC S.R. 2640), a fifty -foot (50') public right -of -way; said right -of -way shown on a plat entitled "Regency Manor — Section 4," and recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 34, at Page 249; said point also being the westernmost corner of Lot 61 on that plat; and running thence from the point of beginning: North 19 026'38" East, 558.19 feet to a point in the southeastern right -of -way of Interstate 140, a public right -of -way; thence with that boundary, North 47 046'44" East, 75.72 feet to a point; thence North 49 043'34" East, 533.81 feet to a point; thence North 51 007'48" East, 47.45 feet to a point; thence North 50 056'26" East, 12.35 feet to a point; thence North 50 056'23" East, 293.48 feet to a point; thence Along a curve to the right, having a Radius of 2673.88 feet and Length of 231.65 feet, a Chord of North 56 059'10" East, 231.58 feet to a point; thence leaving the right -of -way, South 03 023'29" West, 362.77 feet to a point; thence South 38 044'42" West, 1163.65 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 10.35 acres more or less. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 7 - 7 Ak f4� r' 4w . L.A 4WW� IL 1A Ap Ai TVA - 71A A f VD Boa v OPPOSITION MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 8 - 1 Zoning Case # Z 19 -12. Request to rezone a 10.35 Acre Parcel from O &I and R -15 to R -5. Parcel R02600- 003- 010 -000 Located directly adjacent to Regency Manor, Section 4, Northchase PUD Materials submitted by Northchase Homeowners Association, Inc. in opposition to the request. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 1 The existing lots directly adjacent to the property to be rezoned average 14,370 square feet, the approximate lot size for an R -15 zoning district. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 2 a I^ U] D i Q U) W cr Q LO � p a _ N r N -'2 EM 95 JRII 17 M 9 55 lY2iY fw h� { 3��ooisrc c fw f� mR f q, iM h ti i.CO 2f .x s f„ b b 3.aa zc b N f i !a b r 11 PH a� hm LL y -ia n.e�s y 3 -Ga JG.[f S Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 $n a yyM � I b psp c § I I Cie ¢ � lie p i4 e ! ' 4C5 gag 19gg if bil x w pep gp�. ��tIR n9CC@ :2j" a.oc .dY ✓cr cosar a, CO 8 I i a.00.0 des °q rota 'aia eo :ix W y R r° F' srGa I- iv u i, a: � — 4 ° e .ccsa \ice 'LU` �7m>d7 3i11HQfN�7r3A1VN,7 y -ia n.e�s y 3 -Ga JG.[f S Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 $n a yyM � I b psp c § I I Cie ¢ � lie p i4 e ! ' 4C5 gag 19gg if bil x w pep gp�. ��tIR n9CC@ :2j" r° iv u i, a: 4 ° A rezoning to R -5 would v concentrate the highest density zoning to the interior of the Northchase PUD. The practice and policy for any PUD is to place the high density development adjacent to a major thoroughfare. This would do the opposite. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 4 r r If L_ S� There are two roundabout ways to access the site from North College Road. The shortest is a .S mile route on Northchase Pkwy North, then take a right on Heatheridge Dr., which them becomes Chandler Dr., which then crosses Paramount Way to a private casement between Lots 61 and 62, Regency Manor, Section 4, Northchase PUD. The other route is .9 miles from North College Road to Northchase Pkwy North, then take a right onto Constable Way, then a left onto Wynfield Dr., then a left onto Brucemont Dr., then a right onto Chandler Dr., which then crosses Paramount Way to a private easement between Lots 61 and 62, Regency Manor, Section 4, Northehase PUD. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 5 5' . "= C p C 4l -3 fU C7 --L o 00 M _ 3 O CD 3. d O c CD O O C CV CD cn i-Y j CD O CD p 0 [� a Q on En (D O 3 r� uq r CD i F O CD O P 't y O O' CL 17 O GO OO O F w n � w CD cn . CD C d O CD c o dD CD 7� C vwa p cn O u CD 0 O -� CD CD CS' CCDD C9 r+ 0 d CD (D -3 CD i i u 7 J a a Z C C1 O � rD n O a4 rr 77 Q? J (i 0 LLl 3 CL CD C7 --L o 00 M _ 3 O CD 3. d O c CD O O C CV CD cn i-Y j CD O CD p 0 [� a Q on En (D O 3 r� uq r CD i F O CD O P 't y O O' CL 17 O GO OO O F w n � w CD cn . CD C d O CD c o dD CD 7� C vwa p cn O u CD 0 O -� CD CD CS' CCDD C9 r+ 0 d CD (D -3 CD i i u 7 J a a • w� ss 1� fiy .. Jolyy+uN rfy • z n, C CL tial,�wrf O P Ff vd .d� It t� r ,t+ v� a 90 dm � u fl c 3 V� J G 7 Q/ 3 C = n m UZ r_ C7 no �c 0 j s O CID n f � Board of Commissioners -July 13, 2020 � ITEM: 8 - 9 = 6 A. c. d �h L sP O �Q y rD a � a rt Q CQ W z a h n a �J O N �Q- .f 0 Z 0 1+ O W W _O O C C ;C 3 (0 O a Z N co 0 Zn Q `Y 01 a� a4 J R �r � rC 101° O � �t1 u[ e. • w� ss 1� fiy .. Jolyy+uN rfy • z n, C CL tial,�wrf O P Ff vd .d� It t� r ,t+ v� a 90 dm � u fl c 3 V� J G 7 Q/ 3 C = n m UZ r_ C7 no �c 0 j s O CID n f � Board of Commissioners -July 13, 2020 � ITEM: 8 - 9 = 6 A. c. d �h L sP O �Q y rD a � a rt Q CQ W z a h n a �J O N �Q- .f 0 Z 0 1+ O W W _O O C C ;C 3 (0 O a Z N co 0 Zn Q `Y 01 The Staff Report dated January 9, 2020 goes into detail regarding "drainage challenges ". The Northchase PUD has suffered some of the worst flooding in the county from recent hurricanes, particularly Hurricane Florence, that flooded over 100 homes. Though the report mentions that the County is establishing a stormwater service, County staff admitted at the Planning Commission hearing that it would be "years" before there would be any improvements. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 7 these provisions will be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee during the subdivision review process. • Because this is a general map amendment and not a conditional rezoning, uses that would be allowed on the property are those allowed by right or by Special Use Permit in the R -5 district. A conceptual site plan is not included with this application, however, if approved, the development of the site must comply with the standards of the R -5 district and other applicable regulations, including buffering and stormwater standards. • The adjacent portion of Northchase east of the site has a history of flooding due to the area's topography and marginal drainage system. It is possible existing homes in this portion of Northchase have finished floor elevations below a 100 -year flood elevation. Over 100 homes sustained flood damage during Hurricane Florence, which was a 500 to 1000 -year storm event that totaled over 30 inches of rain. • The downstream outfall for this area flows north and crosses 1 -140, Blue Clay Road, and N. College Road eventually draining to Prince George Creek. General Direction of Drainage Flow �S Qc. m i -146 invE�l l�H Subject Site r. Downstream Ourfali • The County was recently awarded a grant to remove debris and sedimentation from streams and waterways impacted by Hurricane Florence in the unincorporated areas of the County. The County is also seeking additional funding to increase the capacity of the drainage system serving the site and the Board of Commissioners recently voted to establish a stormwater service aimed at assisting with the maintenance and improvement of the drainage features within the County. The stormwater service will become effective in July 2020. • While the area contains drainage challenges, a rezoning from 0&1 to R -5 is generally considered to be a down zoning in that the permitted uses in a residential district are less intense and typically generate less impervious coverage and traffic. Further the site must be designed to comply with the County's stormwater standards regardless of the zoning district it is developed under. Z19 -12 Staff Report PB 1.9.2020 Page 4 of 10 PI @F (ffc@ r>alW6Wr9, 2N# 13, 2020 ITE IJ%pa: -82= 4 - 8 List of Northchase owners in opposition to the request and a list of the many reasons the Northchase owners are against the zoning change. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 9 NORTH CHASE HOMEOWNERS OBJECTING TO TRASK PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT BEHIND PARAMOUNT ROAD IN WILMINGTON, NC THE ONLY EGRESS /ACCESS IS CHANDLER ROAD THAT IS IN NORTH CHASE COMMUNITY, ISSUES OF DEEP CONCERN FOR ENTIRE COMMUNITY OF NORTH CHASE ARE: (1) Drainage (2) Increased traffic (3) Utilities (4) overcrowding of schools (5) Safety (6) Buffer placement to control noise (7) Fire /ambulance access (8) road maintenance 0 Q ilc_ G_ �l o 3 15 Cis- W r , i JG 1 ! f y 0 i 1%1( 4U�7 �JdC oo r }c�tt�� =1c� ,yCk� G�UC' Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 10 - P1. r �y1 I } �I�2 ` %.� _/ " `' 5 (1 ci `� J L `�' .., ...... j f 1 . `r.�- 7/,,, Q ilc_ G_ �l o 3 15 Cis- W r , i JG 1 ! f y 0 i 1%1( 4U�7 �JdC oo r }c�tt�� =1c� ,yCk� G�UC' Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 10 ;r i 1 " i• ,Y 1 09 Ots - ' � k e o) (r, 4A ... of 4 .r 21� Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 - 9 - 11 -So l tz c. ���� A ` (CL, If 1,0 +31 I-j2S? Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -9-12 Drainage From Lester Jones "The attachment is the culvert under 1 -140 ( Inside diameter of 11' width X 8' depth). This culvert is the only exit for north end Northchase water runoff that include all of Bridgeport, Heatherridge, Berkleigh Manor, Regency Manor, Marwood Estates, Danbury Forest and Williamburg Place sub - divisions. Also include is water runoff from Northchase Parkway NW from the Pool to Hwy 133 and a large portion of the west side of Hwy 133 to the 1 -140 culvert. There is also weter runoff from 1 -140 onto Northchase that add to water flow thru the culvert. (Unknown where water will flow from the proposed rezoning area. Most likely it will flow into our current drainage system.)" What is the original flow rate from the original engineering of the culvert under 1 -140? How is that going to support this new development? That area flooded during Florence - Has there been an impact analysis done for the drainage issue? - What are the plans to move water out of that area? Traffic Utilities - Is there an alternative ingress and egress point? - How are emergency vehicles going to adequately get through? - Has there been an impact assessment done on Chandler Drive and the other streets in the community that will be used? - Are they proposing speed bumps, roundabouts, traffic lights? What is being proposed to deal with the traffic? - What are the length of the driveways going to be? How many cars are actually going to be there? - Has there been an impact study to the increased traffic on North College Rd.? - Where are they going to pull the water and sewer lines from? - Is that going to come through NorthChase? - Additional traffic and construction if needed improvements to that infrastructure Additional children - overcrowding at schools - overcrowding on busses - more children waiting for busses causing concern for safety with increased density and traffic - more children trespassing on private property to cut through NorthChase to get to other areas What type of buffer is being proposed between the properties? - Would want at least a 10' privacy fence and 8' shrubs facing NorthChase Density increase- increasing density 3 fold what greenspace is being proposed in exchange for the increase in density? exactly how many cars are anticipated per property? Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -9-14 increase in crime increase in unknown individuals coming through the neighborhood - concern of non - members using NorthChase facilities possibility of needing increased policing possible increased cost to NorthChase to maintain our common areas due to increase in people coming through the neighborhood increased noise from traffic and additional people Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 8 -9-15 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Brad Schuler, Senior Planner CONTACT(S): Brad Schuler; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -04) - Request by Design Solutions on Behalf of the Property Owner, Trinity Reformed Orthodox Church, to Rezone Approximately 3.00 Acres of Land Located at 4725 South College Road from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in Order to Develop 22 Townhomes BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 3.0 acres from R -15 to (CZD) R -5 for the development of townhomes near the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and South College Road. The proposal consists of 22 dwelling units with a maximum of 4 units in any structure. The current zoning of the property would allow up to 8 dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre under the performance residential standards. The applicant is proposing 22 townhomes at a net density of 7.3 dwelling units per acre. A by -right residential development on the site under the current zoning of 8 dwelling units is estimated to generate about 10 trips in the AM peak hours and 9 trips in the PM peak hours. The proposed 22 townhomes are estimated to generate about 11 trips in the AM peak hours and 15 trips in the PM peak hours. The expected net difference in traffic would be an increase of 1 AM and 6 PM peak trips. The site is located directly adjacent to a major roadway and attached homes like quadplexes, triplexes, and duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between major roads and single - family neighborhoods. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan classifies the property as Community Mixed Use. This Place Type promotes a mixture of commercial and higher density residential development with densities ranging up to 15 dwelling units per acre. Overall, the proposal is general CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan's intent of providing an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, is in line with density range recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area. The Planning Board considered this item at their March 5 meeting. At the meeting, neighboring residents expressed concerns regarding flooding issues in the area and with buffering from the existing single - family homes. The Planning Board recommended denial (3 -2) of the application. While finding the proposal to be CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area, the Planning Board found DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not of a derisible character due to flooding that will Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. In response to the concerns presented at the Planning Board meeting, the applicant has added several conditions including preserving existing trees within required bufferyards and making improvements to existing stormwater infrastructure. In addition, the height of the structures will be limited to one story, which is shorter than most of the abutting single - family dwellings to the north. The stormwater improvements will include replacing an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow flow to an existing drop inlet located at the southeastern corner of the site, installing an outlet to and deepening and cleaning out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow from the aforementioned drop inlet. In addition, an existing 18 -inch culvert under Woods Edge Road (located approximately 650 feet south of the subject site), shall be replaced with a minimum 36 -inch culvert. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is in line with the density range recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and it supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1. The structures shall be limited to one -story in height (approximately 14 feet). 2. The existing trees located within the required buffer areas shall be preserved and supplemented as needed to provide an opaque screen. 3. Pet waste stations shall be provided within the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the existing stormwater infrastructure shall be improved along the site. The improvements will include replacing an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow flow to an existing drop inlet located at the southeastern corner of the site, installing an outlet to and deepening and cleaning out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow from the aforementioned drop inlet. 5. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an existing 18 -inch culvert under Woods Edge Road (located approximately 650 feet south of the subject site), shall be replaced with a minimum 36 -inch culvert. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT standards. 6. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the structures shall be constructed of either fiber cement or brick exterior. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommend approval as presented by staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: A motion to approve with 6 conditions was denied 3 -2, Chair Olson - Boseman and Commissioners Barfield and Zapple voting in opposition. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z20 -04) Request by Design Solutions on behalf of the property owner, Trinity Reformed Orthodox Church, to rezone approximately 3.00 acres of land located at 4725 South College Road from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) R -5, Moderate -High Residential District, in order to develop 22 townhomes. 1 . This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is in line with the density range recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and it supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. [Optional]: Note any conditions to be added to the district. 1 . The structures shall be limited to one -story in height (approximately 14 feet). 2. The existing trees located within the required buffer areas shall be preserved and supplemented as needed to provide an opaque screen. 3. Pet waste stations shall be provided within the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the existing stormwater infrastructure shall be improved along the site. The improvements will include replacing an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow flow to an existing drop inlet located at the southeastern corner of the site, installing an outlet to and deepening and cleaning out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow from the aforementioned drop inlet. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 1 - 1 5. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an existing 18 -inch culvert under Woods Edge Road (located approximately 650 feet south of the subject site), shall be replaced with a minimum 36 -inch culvert. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT standards. 6. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the structures shall be constructed of either fiber cement or brick exterior. Example Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be [Consistent /inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] STAFF REPORT FOR Z20 -04 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z20 -04 Request: Zoning Map amendment to rezone 3.0 acres from R -15 to (CZD) R -5 to develop 22 townhomes Applicant: Property Owner(s): Cindee Wolf with Design Solutions Trinity Reformed Orthodox Church Location: Acreage: 4725 S. College Road 3.0 PID(s): Comp Plan Place Type: R07100-004-012-001 Community Mixed Use Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Undeveloped Dual -Unit Attached & Quadraplex Dwellings (2- 4- unit townhome structures) Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -15 (CZD) R -5 Moderate -High Residential SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Single - Family Residential R -15 East Single - Family Residential R -15 South Single - Family Residential, Institutional R -15 West S. College Road Right -of -Way, Multi - Family Residential MF -L (City of Wilmington) Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 1 Page 1 of 16 a ,tom fr s 'a r !' e e 17. I Fe k IFIJ+i•i,F, C� ..►' MFR �? # ._ �+ r t.. t i +i ZONING HISTORY October 15, 1969 Initially zoned R -15 (Masonboro) COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer water and sewer services are available through CFPUA. Specific design Historic will be determined during site plan review. Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Southern Fire District, New Hanover County Station Myrtle Grove Bellamy Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, and Ashley High schools Schools For more information, see the full School statistics below. Recreation Myrtle Grove School Park, Arrowhead Park, Trails End Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Page 2 of 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 2 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN t � � 15 lh P I8 19 20 27 r 0 (�!� rs 6 5 t 2 I 5' t I -HULL\ VALLEY ROAD Above: Applicant's Conceptual Plan • The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 3.0 acres from R -15 to (CZD) R -5 in order to construct a townhome development located near the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and South College Road. The proposal will consist of 22 dwelling units with a maximum of 4 units in any structure. • The structures will be limited to one story in height, about 14 feet, and constructed with fiber cement or brick exterior. • The applicant is proposing to install at least four pet waste stations within the development. • At the Planning Board meeting, concerns were presented regarding flooding that occurs in area during large rain events. New Hanover County Engineering staff have indicated the Hidden Valley subdivision, along with other neighborhoods in the vicinity, have on -going drainage issues that existed prior to Hurricane Florence because they are situated in a lower area between College Road and Masonboro Loop Road with a portion of the stormwater runoff draining west to College Road towards Mott's Creek and the remainder draining to Masonboro Loop Road towards Whiskey Creek. In addition, there have been drainage issues identified along the NCDOT right -of -way (College Road) and in the backyards of homes located east of the site. • The applicant further examined the flooding issue and has identified deficiencies with the existing stormwater infrastructure. Specifically, the applicant located a drop inlet located near the southeastern corner of the property that does not currently have an outlet. According to the applicant, this drop inlet collects stormwater from approximately 20 properties, and with no outlet, the stormwater accumulates to flood the nearby area. • To help alleviate the flooding issue, the applicant is proposing to add an outlet to the aforementioned drop inlet and to deepen and clean out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow. In addition, the applicant is proposing to replace an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow additional flow to the Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 3 Page 3 of 16 drop inlet to help reduce flooding that is occurring hn the back yards of the adjacent houses east of the site. � The applicant is also proposing to make |mprovemen1soff'd+e by replacing on existing culvert under Woods Edge Rood (located approximately dJO feet from the subject site). The culvert is currently 18 inches in size and will be replaced to u minimum 36'|nch culvert. Z20-04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners ' July 13.2O2O � Page 4ofU6 Subject Site Existing Pipe to Subject Site 0 be Replaced to + 'k Drop Inlet Location Existing Ditch to be 7r Deepened & Cleaned Outlet to be Out to Allow for Outfall ��t + Installed Drop Inlet with no Current La Outlet Hidden Valley PLANTED ISLAND Z20-04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners ' July 13.2O2O � Page 4ofU6 Subject Site Location Culvert to be Enlarged Z20-04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners ' July 13.2O2O � Page 4ofU6 • Also, New Hanover County Engineering staff has submitted a FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program proposal to determine potential mitigation and /or improvement projects to help with issues in this area. In addition to possible federal funding, the County's Stormwater Services program will begin maintenance and capital improvement projects in July 2021. • A 20 -foot perimeter setback and bufferyard is required along the northern and eastern property boundaries adjacent to the single - family dwellings within the Hidden Valley and Wedgefield subdivisions. The applicant is proposing to preserve the existing vegetation within the buffer areas and supplement as necessary to meet the opacity requirements. aoQ� e'caNOPV TREE (TVa) 6'UNDERSTORY TREE ITYPI YM 20 1010' >I' ' BUFFER OPTION 01 B CANOPYTREEMP! < / 6'UNDERSTORtl TREE (FYP] �{ t_j 100' Improved -11 oQ Stormwater Infrastructure BUFFER OPTION 02 Above: Applicant's Rendering with Staff Markups ZONING CONSIDERATIONS • The R -15 and R -5 districts are both residential zoning districts. While the R -5 district (8 du/ac) permits more base density than the R -15 district (2.5 du/ac), it prohibits mobile homes and typical multi - family development, like apartments, allowing a maximum of 4 units within any residential structure. In addition, the additional dwelling allowance special use permit is not allowed in the R -5 district, and the number of permitted nonresidential uses is reduced. • The current zoning of the property (R -15) would allow up to 8 dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre under the performance residential standards. The applicant is proposing 22 townhomes at a net density of 7.33 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum density of the R -5 district (8 dwelling units per acre), as well as the recommended density of the Comprehensive Plan's Community Mixed Use Place Type (12- 15 dwelling units per acre). Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 5 Page 5 of 16 AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT City of Imington .5308 Carolina Development Total Units aml RgmalLnil 5308 Carolina Beach Rd (SF) 95 0 95 Bennett Village Apts(MF) 72 24 48 Whiskey Branch (SF) 156 80 76 Total 323 1 104 219 "Based on Building Permits and Aerial Photography" 1 0� u Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Page 6 of 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 6 R -15 R -5 Proposed (CZD) R -5 Min Lot Size 15,000 sf 5,000 sf N/A (Conventional) Base Density 2.5 du /ac (8 total 8 du /ac 7.33 du /ac (Performance) units) (24 total units) (22 total units) Additional Dwelling 10.2 du /ac (31 total N/A N/A Allowance units) Permit Single- family, mobile Single- family, duplex, Permitted home, duplex, nhomes Townhomes Housing Types townhomes, multi- 4- u (max 4- units /building) (max 4- units /building) family 20 uses w/ SUP 10 uses w/ SUP (convenience stores, (recreation Nonresidential kennels, camping) establishments, day care centers) N/A Uses - 15 uses by -right 10 uses by -right (wholesale nurseries, (parks, libraries, stables) churches) AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT City of Imington .5308 Carolina Development Total Units aml RgmalLnil 5308 Carolina Beach Rd (SF) 95 0 95 Bennett Village Apts(MF) 72 24 48 Whiskey Branch (SF) 156 80 76 Total 323 1 104 219 "Based on Building Permits and Aerial Photography" 1 0� u Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Page 6 of 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 6 TRANSPORTATION • The conceptual plan shows access is provided to the subject property by Hidden Valley Road (SR 1704) which connects to South College Road, approximately 500 feet to the west. Hidden Valley Road currently has a divided median near the intersection with South College Road separating traffic entering and exiting the existing Hidden Valley subdivision. Z20 -04 Hidden Valley Rd ;�-JISecvndary Accessrjy 11111111111111111FA FAW® • There are no turning movement restrictions for both traffic entering or exiting the proposed subdivision. The driveway location Hidden Valley Road allows traffic generated by the subdivision to access both South College Road to the west or Masonboro Loop Road to the east. A driveway permit will be required to access the site via Hidden Valley Road. Additional review will be conducted during the driveway permitting process. • Typically, townhomes generate approximately 0.5 trips in the peak hours, while single - family dwellings generate approximately one trip in the peak hours. A by -right residential development on the site under the current zoning would allow 8 dwelling units, which is estimated to generate about 10 trips in the AM peak hours and 9 trips in the PM peak hours. Under the proposed R -5 zoning, 22 townhomes could be constructed on the site, which is estimated to generate about 1 1 trips in the AM peak hours and 15 trips in the PM peak hours. The expected net difference in traffic would be an increase of 1 AM and 6 PM peak trips. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 7 Page 7 of 16 • Because the proposed use does not meet the 100 peak hour trips threshold to require a TIA, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for South College Road near the subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. However, the available volume to capacity data indicates capacity currently exists in this area to support the expected minor increase in traffic projected if this request is approved. NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips Existing Development: Undeveloped 0 AM / 0 PM Typical Development under 8single- family homes 10 AM / 9 PM Current Zoning: South College Road Mohican Trail Proposed Development under 22 townhome units 1 1 AM / 15 PM Proposed (CZD) R -5 Zoning: Mohican Trail to • Because the proposed use does not meet the 100 peak hour trips threshold to require a TIA, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for South College Road near the subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. However, the available volume to capacity data indicates capacity currently exists in this area to support the expected minor increase in traffic projected if this request is approved. NCDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Location Volume Capacity V/C From 17th Street to South College Road Mohican Trail 40,000 49,248 0.81 Mohican Trail to South College Road Carolina Beach 33,000 49,248 0.67 Road Piner Road Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 8 Page 8 of 16 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Impact Traffic • w `'01in��W lu frflliME Approved ►i��1:Il �lrC,:y`y+�i,, g_;` _ - i • Under Review w � r i STIP Project ' -- U -5790 I STIP Project H Miles 0 0.25 0.5 Nearby NC STIP Projects: • STIP Project U -5702B o Proposal that will install access management and travel time improvements to S. College Road from Shipyard Boulevard to Carolina Beach Road. This project is currently unfunded. • STIP Project U -5790 o Proposal that will convert the intersection of Carolina Beach Road and College Road to a continuous flow intersection and widen a portion of Carolina Beach Road south of that intersection. Continuous flow intersections permit more efficient travel movements and help alleviate congestion by allowing more of the main street's traffic to move through the intersection. Construction schedule of the project is currently on hold for the foreseeable future. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 9 Page 9 of 16 Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses must be re- examined by NCDOT if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Proposed Land Use /Intensity TIA Status Development • Phase 1A: 88 Single - Family Dwellings, 82 Townhomes • TIA originally approved 1. Whiskey Branch • Phase 1 B: 325 Apartments August 25, 2017 • Phase 2: 50,000 sq. ft. of • Revised TIA approved General Office, 150,000 October 10, 2019 sq. ft. of Shopping Center The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Phase 1 B: o Construct southernmost site access and restrict to right- in/right -out (roughly across from Pine Hollow Drive) • Full Build: • Install traffic signal at the unsignalized U -turn pair north of Mohican Trail. • Construct a southbound signalized left turn lane on S. College Road at the northernmost site access (roughly across from The Gardens Condominiums) • Construct a southbound to northbound U -turn south of Weybridge Lane • Construct a northbound to southbound U -turn north of Weybridge Lane. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: 156 lots in Phase 1 have been platted at this time. The commercial component is not currently permitted and would require the site to be rezoned. SCHOOLS • Students generated from this development would be assigned to Bellamy Elementary, Myrtle Grove Middle, and Ashley High schools. Students may apply to attend public magnet, year -round elementary, or specialty high schools. • Eight dwelling units would be permitted under the current R -1 5 zoning base density, and 22 units would be allowed under the proposed zoning for an increase of 14 dwelling units • Based on average student generation rates,* there are an average of 0.24 public school students (0.11 for elementary, 0.05 for middle, and 0.08 for high) generated per dwelling unit across New Hanover County. The proposed development can be estimated to generate 5.3 (2.4 elementary, 1.2 middle, and 1.7 high) students, which is approximately 3.4 more than if developed under existing zoning. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 10 Page 10 of 16 Development Type Intensity Estimated Student Generation Existing Development Undeveloped Total: 0 Typical Development 8 residential units Total: 1.9 under Current Zoning Assigned (0.9 elementary, 0.4 middle, 0.6 high) Proposed Development Capacity Total: 5.3 under Proposed (CZD) R -5 22 residential units (2.4 elementary, 1.2 middle, 1.7 high) Zoning Assigned Upgrades *Average student generation rates are calculated by dividing the projected New Hanover County public school student enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year by the estimated number of dwelling units in the county. While different housing types and different locations typically yield different numbers of students, these average generation rates can provide a general guide for the number of students to anticipate. Total projected student enrollment was used, which includes students attending out -of- district specialty schools, such as year -round elementary schools, Isaac Bear, and SeaTECH. School Enrollment* and Capacity * * - 2021 -2022 Estimates *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas. Existence of wetlands will be verified during the development review process. The property is located along the boundary of two watersheds (Whiskey Creek and Mott Creek). Based on the applicant's preliminary stormwater design and existing infrastructure, the site will be designed to drain south toward Mott Creek. Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the site will be served by CFPUA water and sewer. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 11 Page 11 of 16 Total Enrollment of Capacity of % of Funded Level NHC % School Assigned Assigned Capacity of Capacity Capacity School School w/ Assigned Upgrades Portables School Elementary 97% Bellamy 465 499 93% None Middle 107% Myrtle 714 738 97% None Grove High 105% Ashley 1869 1776 105% None *Enrollment is based on projected New Hanover County Schools enrollment for the 2020 -2021 school year. * *Capacity calculations were determined by New Hanover County Schools for the 2020 -2021 school year and are based on NC DPI Facility Guidelines & Class Size Requirements. Modifications refer to specific program requirements unique to a particular school. These may include exceptional children's classrooms beyond the original building design; classrooms to serve a unique population such as ESL; or classrooms designated for art and music if the building wasn't specifically designed with those spaces. ENVIRONMENTAL • The property does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas or Natural Heritage Areas. Existence of wetlands will be verified during the development review process. The property is located along the boundary of two watersheds (Whiskey Creek and Mott Creek). Based on the applicant's preliminary stormwater design and existing infrastructure, the site will be designed to drain south toward Mott Creek. Per the Classification of Soils in New Hanover County for Septic Tank Suitability, soils on the property consist of Class III (severe limitation) soils, however, the site will be served by CFPUA water and sewer. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 2 - 11 Page 11 of 16 CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY • Attached homes like quadplexes, triplexes, and duplexes are commonly seen as a transitional development between major roads like S. College Road and single - family neighborhoods. • As the site abuts S. College Road, it is expected the majority of the trips generated from the development will utilize this road for access. • Townhomes tend to generate less traffic per unit than traditional single - family homes because they are often occupied by smaller households (retirees or young adults without children). • In order to enhance compatibility, the applicant has agreed to conditions to limit the height of the dwellings so they will be shorter than most of the abutting single - family homes to the north. Many of the homes on Wedgefield Drive north of the site are two stories and exceed 14 feet in height. The applicant has also agreed to preserve the existing vegetation located along the property abutting the single - family homes. Representative Developments in R -5: � J Marsh Oaks Jumpin' Run IRF Marsh Oaks: 1 Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -2-12 Page 12 of 16 Representative Developments in R -15: Wedgefield/ Hidden Valley: Wedgefield Hidden Valley 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -2-13 Page 13 of 16 w Place Type City of Wilminglan 1 s 3 A w' r DNE - E rcl. 1 1. CO UNI IKED1USE R` f AMR ''AA�rf�s if ptc.n fir; 9�. ss■■rr � �� CROS$W NDS'.��■f.q� �I�Ifi Z2f} -D4 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL �1F r W J C'Fr1fL,? 4j $t'�NCi MIT ED USE, FOr" w0oo R te° New H'%w br County, NC Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Focuses on small - scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve Place Type all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and Description visitors. Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi - family and single - family residential. The subject property is located at the corner of S. College Road and Hidden Valley Road, just north of the Carolina Beach Road and South College Road intersection (Monkey Junction). It is designated Community Mixed Use, which is common for areas along highway corridors. This place type assignment is intended to support more density near major roads with a transition to lower densities adjacent to existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods. Existing development along this section of Carolina Beach Road includes townhome and multi - family units along the west side (south bound) of the South College Road corridor. The subject parcel is one of the few parcels on the east side (north bound) of South College Road where there is opportunity to provide housing options other than detached single - family Analysis homes. Housing forms such as townhomes tend to use land more efficiently and be smaller in size, making new units more affordable and providing a greater range of housing price points in the area. The Comprehensive Plan identifies a suggested density range for residential development in each place type to assist in identifying what might be appropriate depending on the context of a site and adjacent development patterns. The Community Mixed place type calls for up to 15 multi - family dwelling units per acre and 8 dwelling units an acre for single family residential. The proposed density at 8 units an acre falls in line with the place type. The 7.3 unit per acre density of the proposed townhome development is in line with this recommendation and would provide the intended transition from higher density uses along South College Road to the lower density existing neighborhoods. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -2-14 Page 14 of 16 The proposed (CZD) R -5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan's intent of providing an orderly transition of residential Consistency densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas, is in line with density Recommendation range recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this item at their March 5 meeting. At the meeting, neighboring residents expressed concerns regarding flooding issues in the area and with buffering from the existing single - family homes. The Planning Board recommended denial (3 -2) of the application. While finding the proposal to be CONSISTENT with the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area, the Planning Board found DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not of a derisible character due to flooding that will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The proposed R -5 rezoning is generally CONSISTENT with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it contributes to providing a mix of housing options in the area, provides for the orderly transition of between existing lower density residential neighborhoods and South College Road, and the overall project density is in -line with those recommended in the Community Mixed Use place type. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is in line with the density range recommended for the Community Mixed Use place type, and it supports opportunities for more affordable housing and assists with providing a range of housing types to the area. Conditions: 1. The structures shall be limited to one -story in height (approximately 14 feet). 2. The existing trees located within the required buffer areas shall be preserved and supplemented as needed to provide an opaque screen. 3. Pet waste stations shall be provided within the development. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.1 3.2020 Page 15 of 16 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -2-15 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the existing stormwater infrastructure shall be improved along the site. The improvements will include replacing an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow flow to an existing drop inlet located at the southeastern corner of the site, installing an outlet to and deepening and cleaning out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow from the aforementioned drop inlet. 5. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an existing 18 -inch culvert under Woods Edge Road (located approximately 650 feet south of the subject site), shall be replaced with a minimum 36 -inch culvert. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT standards. 6. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the structures shall be constructed of either fiber cement or brick exterior. Alternative Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a conditional R -5 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because the proposal provides an orderly transition of residential densities from higher intensity to lower intensity areas and provides for the provision of a range of housing choice and diversity in the area, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community and the density will adversely impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Z20 -04 Staff Report 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -2-16 Page 16 of 16 PRIM Case: Z20 -04 Site Address: 4725 S College Rd ►r►r ►►►rr ► ►rrr ►rr ► ► ►rr ►► � ,frr ►►r►►r► .. ►rrr► ;r ►rlr ► ►ll►►rr _ r11►Ir1► ° rr ► ►l► 500 City Feet Subject Site Existing Zoning/Use: R -15/ Undeveloped CROcc;>, . mi sio ers -July 13, IT M: -3 -1 Proposed Use/Zoning: (CZD) R -5/ Townhomes ' Zoning Districts R -15 A -1 EDZD E PD R -20S SC AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7 B -1 M 1 -2 R -15 RA B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU ® Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) COD] See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Incorporated Areas SHOD Case: Z20 -04 Site Address: 4725 S College Rd 8AcO,�N " COMMUNITY MIXED USE A bROSIN fT `, CItV .. ' 1 a 500 Existing Zoning/Use: R -15/ Undeveloped 0 w Subject Site r. q WooDS �t _ Feet / _ f Co mi sio ers - July 13, IT M: -4 -1 —cur Proposed Use/Zoning: (CZD) R -5/ Townhomes N 'GENERAL RESIDENTIAL — WINDS,DR Place Types COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY MIXED USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z20 -04 4725 S College Rd R -15/ (CZD) R -5/ Undeveloped Townhomes 1T]TT� Q \AB.4CO� � � �910,��O 5907 �" W EkUMA LN ��%j 4590 [4586 Q 5912 ��LLLJJ ! 5909 ELI 4584 V1_4 82 V 5911 ! 5912 5913 ©4568 4580 78 4600 2566 4576 • 5916 917 5.4 p A Np�� 4604 4607 • OS i �ry ��f667 • • ! 5906 4660 4669 4613 4608 i 4608 • 4617 4701 4608 4628 ! • i 4705 4612 * 4628 • 4709 $612 4612 462 i 4628 463• 4636+ 4636 ST7(( 4602 4612 • 4713 MEADOW DR • • 4616 • 4616 462414624 4636 4636 4656 • 4620 1616 • 4624.4624 4640`4640 !0 4656 4660 4660 • 0 4704 1616 • 4620 4640.4640 4656 • 4700 • 1 4712 4616 t4620 4660 4660 4725 ! 4708 • • 4716-- 4620 ! 4644 4644 4652 4652 4664 4664 • 4620 46 414644 4648.4652 4664!• 4664 4648 4648 4668 .4668 4 654 650 C • 4 Subject Site 669 ! :46 `42 :38 ! %1T7r7, • 665 661 657 653 ��]]� Q�/ 04804 4804 ! ! • 649 645 '-ALL 1117f i T] 4804 „� A o a • • i 64 f 0 37 PRIOR DR 500 Feet ❑ NeigftffAA1�FPWM --- 1 5000 5001) • • 5002-5003 • • 5005 rs - July 13, -5 -1 • 5002 ! 5001 -4707 500' • LLI R -15 ' W � � CITY R -10 A:& ` 0 HIDDEN VALLEY RD w C7 Q APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 6 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 1 10 Wilmington, North Carolina Telephone (910) 798 -7165 FAX (9 l 0 ) 798 -7053 planningdevelopment.nkg ov.c om CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT Application Applicant /Agent Information Property Owner(s) If different than ApplicantlAgent Name Owner Name CINDEE WOLF TRINITY REFORMED ORTHODOX CHURCH Company Owner Name Z DESIGN SOLUTIONS Address Address PO BOX 7221 3801 WILSHIRE BLVD. City, State, Zip City, State, Zip WILMINGTON, NC 28406 WILMINGTON, NC 28403 Phone Phone 910- 620 -2374 910 -395 -1252 Email Email CWOLF @LOBODEMAR.BIZ Subject Property Information Address /Location 4725 S. COLLEGE RD Parcel Identification Number(s) 313407.58.5330 / [R07100 -004- 012 -001 ] Total Parcel(s) Acreage 3.00 Existing Zoning and Use(s) R -15 / VACANT Future Land Use Classification COMMUNITY MIXED -USE Apptiration Tracking Infafmolion (Staff Only) Case Number D�jate%T me recce iwed: Received by: 1 - V In �!' Wt�i�t f1 Page 3 of 7 Board of Commissioners 3ul�it103n�i Ting District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 9 - 7 - f Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Proposed Conditional Zoning District:_ CZD / R -5 _ Total Acreage of Proposed District: _3.00 AC. Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for con side ration within a Conditional Zoning District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (please provide additional pages if needed). PERFORMANCE SUBDIVISION W/ TWENTY -TWO (22) TOWNHOME -STYLE RESIDENCES Proposed Condition(s) Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding General Use District regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. ** HOMES WILL BE ACCESSED FROM HIDDEN VALLEY DR., A PUBLIC STREET ROW, BY A PRIVATE DRIVE. ** HOMES WILL BE 2 -3 BEDROOM, MAXIMUM TWO- STORY, AND HAVE 1 -CAR GARAGES. ** PROJECT WILL BE SERVICED BY CFPUA WITH CONNECTION TO PUBLIC WATER & SANITARY SEWER MAINS. ** REFERENCE SITE PLAN FOR SITE LAYOUT & IMPROVEMENTS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Page 4 of 7 ITEM: 9 - 7 - conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 Traffic Impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated forth e proposed use based off the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. AT raffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 100 peak hour trips, and the TIA must be included with this application. ITE Land Use: RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE / ITE CODE 230 Trip Generation Use and Variable (gross floor area, dwelling units, etc.): _CALCULATED PER 22 DWELLING UNITS AM Peak Hour Trips: 10 PM Peak Hour Trips: 11 CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT The Conditional Zoning District procedure is established to address situations where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance objective and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The procedure is intended primarily for use with transitions between zoning districts of very dissimilar character where a particular use or uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses, can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community -at- large. The applicant must explain, with reference to attached plans (where applicable), how the proposed Conditional Use Zoning District meets the following criteria. 1. How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development? (For example: the Comprehensive Plan and applicable small area plans) The policies for growth and development encourage safe and affordable housing to be available to every citizen. Sustainability of the County depends on sensible in -fill and maximizing use of lands already accessible to urban services. 2. How would the requested Conditional Zoning District be consistent with the property's classification on the Future Land Use Map located within the Comprehensive Plan? The tract is identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as a Community Mixed -use place type. The plan suggests higher densities to support the small - scale, compact development patterns that the place type promotes. The proposed townhome development is an acceptable transition between the busy highway corridor and the more established single - family housing beyond the boundary of the tract. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? The property had previously been designed for a religious institution, but those plans never came to fruition. S. College Road is a thoroughfare of the community. Single- family residences are less attractive along very traffic corridors. A denser housina style makes infill possible with better affordabil Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 Page 5 of 7 ITEM: 9 - 7 - conditional Zoning District Application — Updated 5/2017 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify all of the listed items are included and confirm by initialing under "Applicant Initial'. If an item is not applicable, mark as "N /A". Applications must be complete in order to process for further review. Required Information Applicant Staff Initial Initial 1 Complete Conditional Zoning District application. CAW 2 Application fee — ($600 for 5 acres or less, $700 for more than 5 acres. An additional $300 fee must be provided forapplications requiring TRC review). CAW s 3 Community meeting written summary. CAW -sS A Traffic impact analysis (for uses that generate more than 100 peak hour trips). N/A A 5 Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page reference of the property requested for rezoning. CAW r�$ 6 Site Plan including the following elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads. • Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements. For residential uses, this shall include number, height and type of units and area to be occupied by each structure and /or subdivided boundaries. For non- residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy and the specific purpose for which it will be used. • Development schedule including proposed phasing. • Traffic and Parking Plan to include a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract, proposed right -of -way dedication, plans for access to and from the tract, location, width and right -of -way for internal streets and location, arrangement and access provision for parking areas. CAW • All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights -of -way, buffering and signage. • The one hundred (100) year floodplain line, if applicable. • Location and sizing of trees required to be protected under Section 62 of the Zoning Ordinance. • Any additional conditions and requirements, which represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding General Use District regulations or other limitations on land which may be regulated by State law or Local Ordinance. • Any other information that will facilitate review of the proposed change Ref. Article VII as applicable). 7 1 hard copy of ALL documents AND 8 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required b staff depending on the size of the document site plan. CAW 8 1 PDF digital copy of ALL documents AND plans. CAW Page 6 of 7 Board of Commissioners C4 I'Xitrlo3riai�o ing District Application — Updated 5/2017 ITEM: 9 - 7 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURES By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which is being applied. I understand that the existing official zoning map is presumed to be correct. I understand that I have the burden of proving why this requested change is in the public interest. ]certify that this application is complete and that ail information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant f agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and commitments; and 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with or arising out of this application. Gilbert A. lmal4 r N Signature of Properly Owner(s) Print Nome(s) R9t TR%Nrf` E II` CO oRT>r1fl OCX C�1v�'C,'1� ��. bESlCAN SQL- VTJ0t.JS S-YWT6IA L6LOL Signature of AppIkeftgAgent Print Name NOTE; Form must be signed by the ownerls) of record. If there are multiple property owners o signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notioe has been sent to the newspaper (approximately 2 -3 weeks before the hearing), the item will be calendered for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been sent to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. P -A- Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 5 . 37.ro rc w Legal Description for Conditional Zoning District Beginning at a point at the intersection of the northern boundary of Hidden Valley Drive (S.R. 1704), a variable width public right -of -way, with the eastern boundary of South College Road (N.C. Hwy. 132), a 200' public right -of -way; said point being shown on the plat for Hidden Valley — Section 1, recorded among the land records of the New Hanover County Registry in Map Book 18, at Page 50; and running thence from the beginning with the South College Road right -of- way, North 01 019'58" West, 266.81 feet to a point; thence South 74 057'02" East, 504.24 feet to a point; thence South 01 019'58" West, 266.81 feet to a point in the northern boundary of Hidden Valley Road; Thence with that right -of -way, North 74 057'02" West, 504.24 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 130,699 square feet, or 3.00 acres, more or less. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 7 REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING REQUIRED BY NEW HANOVER COUNTY ZONING ORIDINANCE FOR CONDITIONAL DISTRICT REZONINGS Project Name: Hidden Valley Road Townhomes Proposed Zoning: R -15 to R -5 (CZD) The undersigned hereby certifies that written notice of a community meeting on the above zoning application was given to the adjacent property owners set forth on the attached list by first class mail, and provided to the Planning Department for notice of the Sunshine List on January 16, 2020 . A copy of that written notice and a list of recipients are attached. The meeting was held at the following time and place: Tuesday, January 28, 2020, 6:00 p.m.; at the Arab Shrine Club, 4510 S. College Road. The persons in attendance at the meeting were: Reference attached sign -in List and attached emails received. The following issues were discussed at the meeting: A presentation was given on the proposed project, how it relates to the Comp Plan and the particulars about Conditional Zoning Districts. The majority of the conversation revolved around flooding in the vicinity of The Hidden Valley Drive intersection with S. College Rd, stormwater management, traffic and overall development density. The majority of attendees were strongly opposed to any infill other than 3 -4 single - family homes — although it was explained that up to eight (8) residential units are permitted, by- right, as the tract exists today in the R -15 district, and that there are no restrictions on the housing style under the "performance" standards. As a result of the meeting, the following changes were made to the petition: No changes were made to the concept layout of eighteen (18) units, but the plan has been better detailed and labeled for submittal. Date: February 3. 2020 Applicant: Design Solutions By: Cindee Wolf Boara ot Commissioners - july 7, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 8 Community Information Meeting Hidden Valley Townhomes Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Name Address Email (Optional) `�o�,t„c, � �'� � ��t � �n V +. ►�.5�� �� . '�'O�1Co 3� � � '�- `f �,� o o , Cam? � y W:k V441 oq Pa. mt1xN,rANW� rNe.;I . U111 !1O + d 17 y ,-� 6 (T' �� i l K�U � e� lP� �' 1-1-ia -dev�, Vc� I�. �i �.�� neSar mail• c on--�, N,r ne men d c6 4? 3 3MJe -c. e-(i-d ))r- d condo,n5j ewfl r -cam 5katV Tc �5 ' I ' �// "� � �'� � l `sue{ zv- Cindee Wolf (c I Project Planner Leo 1 u cwolf @lobodemar.biz Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 9 -11 Community Information Meeting Hidden Valley Townhomes Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Name Address Email (Optional) r � v 7o" vt -Ts V) Li S�u4sc 32 , l�rzr �� Z—A) 61a,3 m6w �S4 1� M Ar I X O 5 '� �' �r r' / ✓?i J ��! �+ �'�f^ l.rif � �� � �f G� G.GLD � f�D iy` 4 "fig,'(• 6- L'"I-%) 'aj-6LL ek\611.0 �v �h vol �y j2c� Me "n-VL corn 70 iu� a coq �1tdd�� ��'l�Q S.Sas�lart�Gi 0.b1. cz v\ foo Y�, (� �ldQ �^1 c 1464Tg k --v )01 A kKQ .P4. ^I to -N, vehey IvI�. cow L[r,ra -t 4w( - ��� Kf vi `doe P sSo s �� � , � •y4 p -. �, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 10 Community Information Meeting Hidden Valley Townhomes Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Name Address Email (Optional) v e_ Q a i A&S L; r, l� II�L r Gore L L�06 K�nil�j/6� 5C, 14-112— ,Z Vats A e-5. rz�ec . rr. c-o&A r- lei ?s) ar� ,°c- cow d L ., f 4�41 'p l� `�'✓' �/�ara�or ut^ r` �i�"'l. --10cW IM NA) Z77 110de 14- or c 4,1. - d-Q -F )1 e( Gi U>✓ -ee(e, - dC 3C o . cS 36 S a 1 V - �C)VN�0ti Jv r.► S�, l� 3� S f{c'c'w, V-- J TSr9 7 e; cIc --c, . co^ G'U'S 1 Y�'�' (j ruN�rnd � L� l 1���oa �/ I r¢ � r�✓`'����fn � ,� �i aa. ��^�,. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 7 - 11 AY�trt,� S CAA - � -a� -,A L,jgp* NNs11 -j J 1 U t � a 0 e A. �, t y- f-d vacs amt, DA4 �dh))tjk)6 d, Wes" 54 e-[,r,( A t j t7-� I hn� oA - cz)��e-77) 1 -17 Bo9i' r f Tom s 3�,dg J'r' a Q X 15 • nlO� rl' 3��►w�.Cc,rq ITE- 12 moiWobodemar.biz From: Michael Troja <michael.troja315 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 4:36 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Development @ Hidden Valley and S. College I find your proposal appalling This type of compressed building would destroy this neighborhood. The appeal of living in a wooded single family home development brought me here 11 years ago, and I've enjoyed the character of this area ever since. this sort of careless development is what destroyed areas like northern New Jersey generations ago. There is a reason for the zoning being the way it is , and many of us here on Hidden Valley are here because we all have a little room on adequate size lots. 20 more households would affect trafffic and conjestion, and drive down the property values of those nearest to this unatractive proposal. Michael Troja owner 315 Hidden Valley Rd. 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-13 moiWobodemar.biz From: Suzanne Hutchinson <malvern1213 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 2:03 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Hidden Valley Rd Hello, I am sorry I will not be able to attend the meeting tonight in regards to to the rezoning of Hidden Valley Rd. I am very much opposed to this plan. I think the present zoning should be kept in place for the good of this neighborhood! Suzanne Hutchinson 330 Hidden Valley Rd. 910 - 232- 276610 Sent from my Whone 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-14 moiWobodemar.biz From: Patrick M. Erwin <tropicalreef @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 11:37 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Cc: Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam Subject: Re: Hidden Vally Road Townhouse Development Dear Mrs. Wolfe, Thank you for the quick response and additional information. I am certainly no development /zoning expert and appreciate the clarifications. It is good to hear thoughtful consideration of logistics regarding traffic, utilities and stormwater. The information I received indicated 22 townhome units, not 2, but I imagine these considerations hold true. I can say that inadequate ditching is a major concern on our street, as many have filled in and flood (including our front yard) with even moderate rainfall. It is less encouraging that the argument for being an asset to our community consists of being less negative than other options - less traffic than a place of worship, or a commercial building. Or being only possibly negative - not "necessarily" decreasing property values. If the land is to be developed, why not develop consistent with the zone and area that already characterizes our neighborhood and the surrounding ones? Most consistent with current land usage would be a few single - family home plots. I have no doubt that new residents are looking for different housing options, but I do doubt that this area has the pedestrian access to businesses and public transportation required by this demographic. Crosswalks and walk /bike paths are popping up north of us, but are not accessible to our neighborhood. All in all, this just seems out of place, and presumably it must be considered so from a development standpoint since re- zoning is needed to change the land usage - as far as I understand. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Best regards, Patrick On Jan 26, 2020, at 11:31 AM, cwolf @lobodemar.biz wrote: We appreciate your comments. I'll offer some explanation. Traffic: Hidden Valley Road is a NCDOT- maintained public street (SR #1704), and certainly adequate to handle the trips generated from just 2 townhomes. It already has the advantages of a dedicated taper & right - turn lane from the South and a "left- over" for turns from the North. The original plan for this site was a church, which probably would have introduced more traffic overall — albeit at more concentrated times. As you can imagine, property with frontage along a busy thoroughfare could be attractive to a multitude of uses — many more intense. We feel that a residential project is much more appropriate than office(s) or something commercially oriented at the entry into your neighborhood. i Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-15 Utilities: There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in Wedgefield Drive. We would be extending that service into this project. There would not be a septic system. Of course the water service will come from the main in Hidden Valley Road. Stormwater Management: As is often the case with older neighborhoods, such as Hidden Valley, there were no stormwater detention requirements when they were developed. All new development must meet pre- / post - runoff standards — meaning that all surfaces created must drain to a pond or other management facility that is sized to control drainage such that the runoff cannot leave the site any differently than it does today in its natural state. We have completed preliminary calculations for the pond area that is shown on the exhibit. Overflow in larger storm events would drain into the highway ditch along S College Road, and then routes southward to the Motts Creek drainageway ultimately towards the Cape Fear River. New Hanover County has recently enacted a stormwater utility program. That will be intended to assist in remedying existing issues with inadequate ditching — such as you've described. Value: New development, even at a greater density, does not necessarily affect surrounding property values adversely. It's normal to transition density between a busy road corridor and older established subdivision. New construction to more current building codes and with more sustainable materials often enhances values in a neighborhood, because of the higher sale prices in the market today. New residents to Wilmington are looking for alternative living styles to the classic single - family home on a larger lot that entails more maintenance. With garages, these townhomes are considered more up- scale. They will be marketed to individual owners and maintenance of the stormwater pond and all common areas the responsibility of a homeowners' association. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have other questions. Thank you. Cindee Wolf Tel. 910 - 620 -2374 From: Patrick Erwin <tropical reef @gmail.com> On Behalf Of Patrick M. Erwin Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 9:41 AM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Hidden Vally Road Townhouse Development Dear Mrs. Wolf, I am contacting regarding your letter informing my neighborhood of the pending townhouse development project on Hidden Valley Road. I appreciate the notification and opportunity to attend to impacted property owners meeting this Tuesday. In the letter, you indicate that the developer looks forward to being an asset to our community. Can you provide any specifics on how the development will positively impact our neighborhood? Our initial reaction is that such a high- density development in a single - family home neighborhood is out of place and would cause logistical issues (e.g. increased traffic, water drainage problems). Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-16 Patrick M. Erwin 437 Hidden Valley Road (910) 619 -5401 3 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-17 cwolf @lobodemar.biz From: Yopp, Emily Ann <Emily.Yopp @ncr.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:34 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Hidden Valley Road Development To whom it may concern, I am a homeowner on Hidden Valley road in Wilmington, NC. I would like to strongly OPPOSE the development of the proposed 22 unit townhome community. I have small children and I am concerned about the influx of traffic to the area, and our street being used more as a `cut through'. With the increase traffic, this causes concern for the safety of my children at the school bus stop. I also encounter heavy flooding and I am concerned that this development will cause increased flooding to my property. Thank you for your time. Emily Yopp Get Outlook for iOS 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-18 moiWobodemar.biz From: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 9:36 AM To: 'Julian' Cc: Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam (carolusbuildingco @gmail.com) Subject: RE: Hidden Valley Road proposal Mr. March, There will certainly be sidewalks within the community, and to include one along the frontage(s) could be a condition of approval. There are long -range plans by the County for a multi -use trail along College Road — similar to what has been installed from 17th Street to Holly Tree by the City of Wilm — from approximately the location of the old Monkey Junction library up to 17th Street. The issue would be whether it will be located on the East or West side of the busy road. Crosswalks would obviously need to be located at signalized intersection. There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in Wedgefield Drive. We would be extending that service into this project, but any further extension eastward onto Hidden Valley Road would be a project for the CFPUA. The depth of the existing manhole invert is not adequate for positive flow for more than 500 -600 linear feet. An "attached" housing development is required to meet all landscape regulations in the NHCo Ordinance for street yard, interior shading and buffer plantings. Regulated trees can only be removed for essential site improvements — buildings, streets, stormwater & utilities. Trees within around the perimeter of the site would certainly be preserved, and supplemented as necessary to provide the full planting requirements — along with the aesthetics desired for new homes. Please do not hesitate to re- contact me if you have additional questions. Thank you. Cindee From: Julian <jmarchnews @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:25 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Hidden Valley Road proposal Good afternoon Cindee, I received your letter with information on the proposal for the lot at the corner of Hidden Valley Road /South College Road. I'm not sure yet if I will be able to attend the meeting Tuesday, but did have a couple of questions /comments for you. 1. Is there a sidewalk planned alongside the Hidden Valley Road portion of the proposed development? It seems this would be prudent if there would be additional foot traffic on that section of the road to keep pedestrians safely away from vehicular traffic. Because of the center median in that section of the road, cars cannot move over to the oncoming lane if pedestrians are in the roadway. 2. It is my understanding the first block of Hidden Valley Road (between South College and Rushing Drive) remains still on septic systems while surrounding areas are on CFPUA sewer service. If the development were to move forward, do you know if that would mean CFPUA would extend sewer service to the 600 block of Hidden Valley? 3. 1 see some additional landscaping trees are planned in the rendering. If the development moved forward, would all the existing trees be removed, or would some trees be left behind? i Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-19 moiWobodemar.biz From: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 4:51 PM To: 'thomas lackey' Cc: Jordy Rawl; Chase Elam (carolusbuildingco @gmail.com) Subject: RE: A Performance Residential Townhome Development Mr. Lackey, We appreciate your comments. I'll offer some explanation. On the traffic issue: Hidden Valley Road is a NCDOT- maintained public street (SR #1704), and certainly adequate to handle the trips generated from just 2 townhomes. It already has the advantages of a dedicated taper & right -turn lane from the South and a "left- over" for turns from the North. The original plan for this site was a church, which probably would have introduced more traffic overall — albeit at more concentrated times. As you can imagine, property with frontage along a busy thoroughfare could be attractive to a multitude of uses — many more intense. We feel that a residential project is much more appropriate than office(s) or something commercially oriented at the entry into your neighborhood. Utilities: There is a public sewer main stubbed to the northern boundary of this tract from the system in Wedgefield Drive. We would be extending that service into this project. There would not be a septic system. Of course the water service will come from the main in Hidden Valley Road. Stormwater Management: As is often the case with older neighborhoods, such as Hidden Valley, there were no stormwater detention requirements when they were developed. All new development must meet pre- / post- runoff standards — meaning that all surfaces created must drain to a pond or other management facility that is sized to control drainage such that the runoff cannot leave the site any differently than it does today in its natural state. We have completed preliminary calculations for the pond area that is shown on the exhibit. Overflow in larger storm events would drain into the highway ditch along S College Road, and then routes southward to the Motts Creek drainageway ultimately towards the Cape Fear River. New Hanover County has recently enacted a stormwater utility program. That will be intended to assist in remedying existing issues with inadequate ditching — such as you've described. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have other questions. Thank you. Cindee Wolf Tel. 910 - 620 -2374 From: thomas lackey <toko3781 @yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 1:02 PM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: A Performance Residential Townhome Development As a adjacent property owner, located at 638 hidden valley rd, Wilmington . I do have a few concerns about your proposed development # 1 . Traffic is a concern i Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-20 #2 Sewer service #3 Water run off and flooding issues I realize that we all have county water but none of have sewer, are you going to have a large septic system installed or what will you do The water runoff is a major concern .. the fist number of lots on the left of hidden valley, when you are entering hidden valley from S. College, have a large drainage ditch behind our property ........ farther down hidden valley there are flooding issues each time we have a heavy storm .... I feel that with the scope of your development we would be affected in a negative way ., especially in regards to the water, drainage issues . Regards Thomas Lackey PO Box 6 Vale, NC 28168 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-21 ■■ IN 47 7 V- z LLJ LU 0 0 r,4 00 0 < —i z U tn LU 0 0 Z LU < 0- —1 L-n —> W CL t.D O rA 00 T- d) M 4- Lit 1r: 0 < tx),= C 3; Z, U. Ill LJL kil I ct. Ik: ri LIA l-I Z Ill 1A 1" 1 1-4 U1 h. PJ 4 VT tu N Iii oil 74; YI t O N Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-22 111 r-1 ,qr 00 z Z Z < z 2 0 cc D L9 X z D Ln 0 LO LO H rn r4 in 0 rn 10 a x LA si, it. 0 4LJ tD wl �4 N 4 ID a1JItn N t -., N rD 1-3 'D -.a- CIO Rj x Z kov ,.t. ID XN OU N 461 III 101 113 10 Iffy W1 ISM :,&a 'k-4 :Tic )10 114 N rn I 0 tZ r14 r-4 0 't U 0 00 N U In of L.Li 0 Cn —j < Ln M 0 Lr) co O (Ti F; • NI tic N (D N' w to QI MI oa so Iii N rn 0 I aW MGr • S S: Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-23 N 00 C-4 Z U Z -j Z LA Z LU 0 0 LU Cc -1 Uj Z LU < fA LU r, -1 LO < ko f]- -;zr W rJ r4� -7- 0 N '4 V4 W U1 0 :: i: Z 0 Uj -4 M Lj j ILI Z cp 2! z t' kIJ:3: Lq tfl LL Lij e.') CIA Ui P.- LA N t4 N -P4 ID r14 p-I 0 N A4 +4 z 04 (Ti F; • NI tic N (D N' w to QI MI oa so Iii N rn 0 I aW MGr • S S: Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-23 N 00 C-4 Z U Z -j Z LA Z LU 0 0 LU Cc -1 Uj Z LU < fA LU r, -1 LO < ko f]- -;zr "I 31 IN 413 dh 11-IN 4109 431 M 1,100 ISJO 1'. db 1'j w gV00 It st rJ r4� -7- 0 N ED V4 W M 0 :: i: Z - P- Uj -4 M Lj j w pt n Wt Z cp 2! z t' kIJ:3: Lq Uj Lij e.') tr LA 0 Ui P.- LA W -P4 ID r14 14 (14 04 N "I 31 IN 413 dh 11-IN 4109 431 M 1,100 ISJO 1'. db 1'j w gV00 It st QI O VII C3 V) of C:) a) 0 �t cr 00 LLJ LU U U z ca < CO 0 0 cc 0 in ar Lr) w A fSi tD 0 CJ iii • was OM io c Ioz F 1 ivy w0; t -4 IZI Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-24 iS tta Z U UP U V N ILI 0; CJ U LLA F-z IIJ =7 It: 7) CI 2F 4t N w A fSi tD 0 CJ iii • was OM io c Ioz F 1 ivy w0; t -4 IZI Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-24 Z IA IIJ N Z A Pj r4 73!j J Ill r4 w Oe ca to N Of < co U cc < M a 0 z 0 I-- x V) z LLJ 00 I-- J N O Lr) �Ir 113 IN) IM ICJ TOO lei ib F�. lr ¢_^ <1 Ln IZ3 00 V) r14 LLJ U F- LLJ C) LLJ 0 cc _j cl. —j 0 O U < (::) —i ID ro -01 Q1 Cr U1 03 ri iii -4 tsr Irs Iss IIf tit ICI oil ri tyl In' i Lu 1ji 4_ � ri Ci Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-25 ILI IS) SS Cif to '7 tO -zz W1 c: to in W C) tu :,z 'Z- IAJ F. -J in 0 to ku INS I'A U, 1-4 ;.m ttil tU 9df -Z: 1XI -Z ti 1 0 I 1-4 x I,-A lJ Q1 Cr U1 03 ri iii -4 tsr Irs Iss IIf tit ICI oil ri tyl In' i Lu 1ji 4_ � ri Ci Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-25 SS '7 ISf z D L 0 to Q1, z I LO al Uj Uj Z' U, 6 I- > 4.7 fl HI ZE QL90:tr JPJ.J ") M < )LD cr F,I < LU 00 P.. lCl iii LU L r4 LU LL. LL, z rsl (n lD C 0 0 LU Ln CD N -,D 2! c I11 Ilt ilk PRO N < U Z tb c rq © ¢ z < > tA 0 0 r-q = M r-1 lV cq Q' up r31 l'1 (14 rvl (D ,4 fit In! , OA vl O V, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-26 �4 rr 0 0 LU C'J 5 (D U < z 3� LO < (D w (j cr- �O D -I < In In M r1 IIJ fit HO 4D N iU LL LL" I < U tra rn C11110 rn ix I In z > < J'k U AAZ 1.4 'A Uj I!L iA,T C100 0 UJ x C', rj Ili z 31, U ux :E z H x: Z I-1 al W- > 000" Ij- rD �j 3c Q' up r31 l'1 (14 rvl (D ,4 fit In! , OA vl O V, Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-26 �4 rr 0 0 LU C'J 5 (D U < z 3� LO < (D w (j cr- �O D -I < In In M I j- T4 W .4 iii r 4 CD ra j liJ IVp iryY IA Ig IY fV IN In Ill I r1 IIJ fit tu LL" I < U 41 .,:7 C11110 U1 > < J'k U AAZ 1.4 if: iD X H 21. I j- T4 W .4 iii r 4 CD ra j liJ IVp iryY IA Ig IY fV IN In Ill I r rr ?fin �; II r LN- Al jl fF II � PQ f 0 13 ❑ Ir - - -r- - - _- n El ❑ ❑ i 0 13 1 I I I 1 r- r /❑ ❑4i ❑ ? Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-27 11 � 11 I I f NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP SITUS ADDRESS ALI MOHAMAD A SHAM IEH 4709 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4709 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON ALTAMIRANO ALVARO & MARIA SOSA 5909 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5909 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON APPLEWHITE CARLOS M COLLEEN 4665 ANDROS LN #200 WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4665 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON ARNOLD KAREN MICHAEL 170 HARLEYVILLE RD SALTVILLE, VA 24370 653 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON AV HOLDINGS LLC 100 AQUA VISTA DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4580 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON BENBASSATSABRINA 4669 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4669 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON BENNETT TIMOTHY R 5003 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5003 BLUEGRASS CT WILMINGTON BERRY BRUCE 708 CROWS NEST CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BESNER REJEAN NATHALIA 9317 KITE ST BURKE, VA 22015 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BLACKMAN PATRICK DECIA JOHN 4612 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4612 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON BLACKMORE CORONADA 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON BOVA DAVID A SHEILA M 11 STRATTON CIR TROY, NY 12182 4564 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON CLU CAS ASHLEY B 4708 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4708 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON CPGPI STILL MEADOW LLC 1330 SAINT MARYS ST STE 1 RALEIGH, NC 27605 4632 STILL MEADOW DR WILMINGTON CREECH FREDERICK E BEVERLY L 4707 WOODS EDGE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4707 WOODS EDGE DR WILMINGTON CUNLIFFE JOSEPH D KATHLEEN M 645 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 645 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON DORAN KELLY 5001 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5001 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON FERDINANDO KEITH 5116 TREYBROOKE DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 649 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON FINCANNON DAVID L LISA P 4607 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4607 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON FIRST STEP LLC 8909 BLUFF CT WILMINGTON, NC 28411 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON GARRISON MICHAEL R ETAL 654 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 654 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON GOODMAN RODNEY ETAL 4576 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4576 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON GRIFFIN TIMOTHY A JILL RENEE 5002 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5002 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON GRUNDMAN WARREN J 661 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 661 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON GULISH KRISTIN 4566 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4566 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON HALL NOVELLA 669 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 669 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON HALL SUSAN ANNETTE 650 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 650 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON HILL LINCOLN GLORIA S 4617 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4617 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON HOWARD JASON W 4586 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4586 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON JARVIS HAROLD W JENNIFER R 4608 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4608 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON JEWEL MICHAEL C TAMMY B 637 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 637 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON JOHNSON LINDA C TITUS D 4616 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4616 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON JOHNSTON BARBARA S 4578 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4578 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON KEENAN MICHAEL J SR DIANE P 4700 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4700 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON KEGLEY GEOFFREY G ROBIN M 5912 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5912 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON KELLY WALTER L DAISY W 4701 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4701 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON KINNEY MICHAEL R ROBIN S 646 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 646 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON KRUEGER CHARLES C ETAL 657 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 657 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON KUHNE JUANITA S 5000 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5000 BLUEGRASS CT WILMINGTON LACKEY THOMAS R JUDY L 924 MOUNT CALVARY LN VALE, NC 28168 638 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON LAROSE KENNETH E KOREEN M 4604 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4604 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON LAWRENCE JERRY KAREN 6040 MARION POINT CT BELEWS CREEK, NC 27009 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON MAJAC PROPERTIES LLC 3600 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON MANNING RICHARD RACHEL 5000 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5000 RANCHWOOD CT WILMINGTON MCCARTHY BRIAN ETAL 4705 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4705 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON MEEHL JOHN B CATHERINE M 4704 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4704 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON MILLER WALTER 111 RITA L 4712 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4712 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON MUTHAIAH MUTHUVEL RAMYA 8012 WADE GREEN PL CARY, NC 27519 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON NOLES LLOYD G TERESA A 4620 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4620 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON PALESE EILEEN J 4667 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4667 ANDROS LN WILMINGTON POWELL MORRIS F 1R KAREN S 5002 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5002 BLUEGRASS CT WILMINGTON RIGDON RONALD JR STACEY 5005 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5005 BLUEGRASS CT WILMINGTON RISLEY RYAN 665 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 665 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON RIVERA DONNA A ETAL 4568 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 4568 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON SAVIANO CLAUDIO 5911 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5911 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON SAYLORS WATCH HOA 3530 LEWIS LOOP BOLIVIA, NC 28422 4590 EXUMA LN WILMINGTON SELVARAJ PUNIAI UMARANI 403 CARRIAGE WOODS CIR CARY, NC 27607 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON SHARPE JEFFREY L SHAWN W PO BOX 217 ALAMANCE, NC 27201 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON SIMPSON COLIN W 641 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 641 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON SMITH ELIZABETH C 5001 BLUE GRASS CT WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5001 BLUEGRASS CT WILMINGTON SOUZA WELLINGTON JOANNA 4716 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4716 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON SPEARS GRANT H 2540 BATCHELDER ST APT 3E BROOKLYN, NY 11235 4613 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON STAUF MARGUERITE D 642 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON, NC 28409 642 HIDDEN VALLEY RD WILMINGTON STOWE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 15773 WILMINGTON, NC 28408 5912 TROPIC CT WILMINGTON SURESH BABU VIMALA 516 CARRIAGE WOODS CIR RALEIGH, NC 27607 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON TEAGARDEN APRIL 4600 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4600 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON THOMA DAWN M 3500 BAILIWYCK WAY WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5917 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON TRINITY REFORMED ORTHODOX CHURCH 3801 WILSHIRE BLVD WILMINGTON, NC 28403 4725 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON TROUT ROBB KACEY L 5916 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 5916 WINDJAMMER DR WILMINGTON VALDIRI ERNESTO MARTHA GARAY 3901 WILLOWICK PARK DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4804 COLLEGE RD S WILMINGTON WEDGEFIELD /CROSSWINDS SO HOA 4744 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4602 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON WILLIAMS ANGELO D ANITA M B 4713 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON, NC 28409 4713 WEDGEFIELD DR WILMINGTON Dest7 Soiution Transmittal January 16, 2020 To: Adjacent Property Owners From: Cindee Wolf Re: A Performance Residential Townhome Development My clients are interested in developing a 22 -unit residential community on lands within the proximity of your property. This proposal would require a Conditional Zoning District approval from New Hanover County. A Conditional Zoning District allows particular uses to be established only in accordance with specific standards and conditions pertaining to each individual development project. Essentially, this means that only that use, structures and layout of an approved proposal can be developed. A plan of the project layout is enclosed. The County requires that the developer hold a meeting for all property owners within 500 feet of the tract boundary, and any and all other interested parties. This provides neighbors with an opportunity for explanation of the proposal and for questions to be answered concerning project improvements, benefits and impacts. A meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 28th, at the Arab Shrine Club, 4510 S. College Road, 6:00 p.m. If you cannot attend, you are also welcome to contact me at telephone # 910- 620 -2374, or email cwolf @lobodemar.biz with comments and /or questions. We appreciate your interest in the project and look forward to being a good neighbor and an asset to the community. P.D. 130x 7221, WilwkiKgton, NC 2.8406 * Telepkone: 910 -62-0 -2374 * Email: CW01f @1obodevvt6tr.biz Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -7-29 Schuler, Brad From: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:47 AM To: Schuler, Brad Cc: Jordy Rawl Subject: RE: Z20 -04 Holly Grove Townhomes - Conditions Brad, As agent on behalf of Trinity Reformed Orthodox Church, those conditions listed are acceptable if the petition is granted approval by the Board. From: Schuler, Brad <bschuler @nhcgov.com> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:35 AM To: cwolf @lobodemar.biz Subject: Z20 -04 Holly Grove Townhomes - Conditions Cindee, As discussed, please let me know that the below conditions are acceptable for your rezoning application Z20- 04. Thanks, Brad 1. The structures shall be limited to one -story in height (approximately 14 feet). 2. The existing trees located within the required buffer areas shall be preserved and supplemented as needed to provide an opaque screen. 3. Pet waste stations shall be provided within the development. 4. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the existing stormwater infrastructure shall be improved along the site. The improvements will include replacing an existing stormwater pipe along the eastern property line to allow flow to an existing drop inlet located at the southeastern corner of the site, installing an outlet to and deepening and cleaning out an existing ditch along the southern property to provide offsite flow from the aforementioned drop inlet. 5. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, an existing 1 8 -inch culvert under Woods Edge Road (located approximately 650 feet south of the subject site), shall be replaced with a minimum 36- inch culvert. Installation of the culvert improvements shall be coordinated with the County and NCDOT and shall be constructed in accordance with NCDOT standards. 6. As proposed and agreed to by the applicant, the structures shall be constructed of either fiber cement or brick exterior. Brad Schuler I Senior Planner Planning & Land Use - Planning & Zoning New Hanover County 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 798 -7444 p 1 (910) 798 -7053 f www.nhcaov.com 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 8 - 1 M i - -� 6 Or " ems.• ' iaea s ,' .� , r�\ Roo. . ; - 4-W wn�- - Y Swo � n f f all ,. c 9 'd , y R 4MMrF — -- -9220 M- 0 �F u Llq�. PPW.4dW r a art.4- y� ow , x _ 6 I 40, -4 lid& J _ _- do ,00� did sh -Mot ot r "a qp -a t �i rX dlr MOIR, L 40 bF *411, O%L vo 1pfA .0 e7 ft.. F. -ago rX dlr MOIR, L 40 bF *411, O%L vo 1pfA .0 e7 ft.. F. t Idpr Ad h6 AL '� Hidden Valley Road Local drainage Assessment Holly Grove proposes twenty -two (22) townhome units with associated parking and additional land improvements. As it pertains to the subject body tract of approximately 3 acres, onsite visits and spot elevation maps have illuminated the possible cause of a frequently flooding issue observed by adjacent homeowners during large rain fall events. The development team has identified one major culprit resulting in the drainage issues the area has experienced. Starting from south side of the property, across Hidden Valley Road in the southeast corner there is a drop inlet that catches surface water from 661 -645 Hidden Valley Road. That Drop Inlet is at an invert of 21.07' and flows to a Drop Inlet at 20.43' near the southeast corner of the property which has no outlet. Further, existing storm piping to north and east also drain to this drop inlet which has no outlet. In addition to there is a Drop Inlet to the North of Drop Inlet 20.43' at 21.75 that catches surface water from the subject tract as well as 654 Hidden Valley Rd that then splits its flow to the north and south. The runoff the flows north ends into a drainage basin shown to the north (an inlet pipe that ends at a 21.63' invert). In summation it is determinable that the water from the surrounding area entering the subdivision of Hidden Valley off College Road has a localized flooding issue for the following c *11Y•»M • The surface area for storm water that is captured for approximately 20 properties enters drop inlets that all lead to the drop inlet near the southeastern corner of the project (invert 20.43 ") approximately 4' below the final grade of the roadway with no outlet. • There is flow line to a ditch that looks to be intended to carry this stormwater to the suitable drainage easements along South College Road, however, is at too high of an elevation to disburse stormwater. • The Flow line is 4' higher that the invert on the drop inlet to which 3 directions of surface water flow to. • In this re- zoning development proposal, the development team will bridge via piping or open swale from this "choke point" of stormwater at the drop inlet showing an invert of 20.43' to the drainage easements located along South College Road. • In addition to the development team will re -lay the 15" RCP shown that boarders the east side of the subject property to all flow to the drop inlet at 20.43'. Once the section in between South College Road and the drop inlet at 20.43' is properly bridged, this should alleviate flooding that has been reported spilling over from the impromptu drainage basin located behind lot 32 Wedgefield at Crosswinds Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 10 - 1 From our determinations, the greatest perpetrator of flooding in this area is the Drop Inlet located with Inv. 20.43. This stormwater structure is intended to link pipe system from multiple directions, then to send it to a direction it can achieve relief. However, the west wall of this stormwater box never had an outlet created, so all of the water from the surrounding area gets to it and then spills over into the road creating a flooding hazard. Finally, it should be noted that the proposed internal improvements to the project are subject to New Hanover County and the State of North Carolina regulations. These regulations require the internal project treat the first 1.5" of stormwater runoff, while also dispensing the stormwater offsite at a rate at or lower than the current development condition for the 2, 10- and 25 -year storm events. A stormwater management pond is proposed for the project that will be designed and built to the required regulations. With that being said, the project site itself should not increase offsite stormwater runoff for the storm events listed above. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -10-2 I, VERNON DEREK DANFORD, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS SURVEYED AND MAP DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION: DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT; RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED BY COMPUTER SANITARY SEWER IS 1:10,000 +; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN BY BROKEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION REFERENCED; THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH "THE STANDARDS OF / /o MANHOLE PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA "; WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSURE 1� {� ��. \�S LOT 35 TOP RIM= 26.33 \\ WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH ` INV. IN= 18.83' NUMBER P,NDnSEAL THI_8TH_ DAY OF __SEPTEMBER A.D. 2016. I �� I \� VERNON DEREK DANFORD V111irrlw, �� N.C. PLS No. L -4528 `�.``�'�'� �RO�'�,,� S E A L - �� • L -4528 vV '�% DEREK ��`• e x NOTES 1. THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONE X PER FRIS ON FIRM MAP NUMBER # 3720313400J DATED: 4 -3 -2006 2. THIS TRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD. 3. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, WHICH MAY REVEAL ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCES, EASEMENTS OR RIGHT OF WAYS NOT SHOWN HEREIN. 4. ELEVATIONS BASED ON 88 DATUM. 5. BENCHMARK ELEVATIONS DETERMINED USING TOPCON SR GPS UNIT UTILIZING THE NC VRS SYSTEM. 6. NC GRID BEARINGS DERIVED USING TOPCON SR, UTILIZING NORTH CAROLINA VRS SYSTEM. 7. ALL BEARINGS ARE NC GRID, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 8. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED AND MAPPED BASED UPON ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE. UNDERGROUND LOCATOR SERVICE RECOMMENDED BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 11 - 1 MB. 33 PG. 240 INV. OUT= 18.77 26.33 NI O N R071 14- 005- 008 -000 SSMH MD 7.5' -OUT 7.56' I II �� DB. 4930 PG. 2347 R E �_ ' CURB INLET #3 � ��i Ul�I� TOP RIM= 26,10' WED ;F R W INV.- 24.00' 45 PUBLIC / r �oo 1 1 ' - -T- - - - - - - - - l \ \� J _�_ �F y I I I LOT 34R 11 t +'1_1 � 1 1 1 1 l \I WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH 1 r 1 I I 4 WATER LEVEL IS ELEV. 22.s,t \ \ \\ ?� \ \\ \ / MB. 33 PG. 240 1 / I I 1 3 -3 -2015 \\ \\ + R07114-005-007-000 PATRICK & DECIA BLACKMAN 1 15' I.E. 24" GALV.= 24.20' \ 1 I e DB. 5642 PG. 637 1 1 5 �-- l \ STORM CONTROL BOX 1 1 I TOP BOX= 24.70' 1 \ 1 f r LE.18 "CPP= 22.20' I z } 1 J BOTTOM WIER= 21.45' \\ 1 5 „ F. E. S raa LOT 3 3 I I 1 1 1 1 S I.E.BOX =20.20 ' l 1� Q 1 w Ld I.E. 24" GALV.= 24.20' 6' \ 1. f INV. =20.50 1 /� 1 WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH I Ld I 1 26.28 \ �\ `� c� ■� 1 MB. 33 PG. 240 I ' I TOP 24" CMP 1' \1 • ' \\ l y ] 11 ` \`t \ 27.10 1� `- R07114 -005- 006 -000 LOT 32 '`sS�+GFENCE 1 i 1 TITUS & LINDA JOHNSON f j 1 DB. 5971 PG. 2951 WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH ao l MB. 33 PG. 240 1 ' IF 15 1 ~ ~�` \ 1 p 1 I I R07114-005-005-000 \ FL I 5 � � . -� � � SANITARY SEWER LLOYD G NOTES, ET UX I FL +� 26 ` 25 4 - ` Ntr �5,. Opp \, 27.10 FENCE IN I MANHOLE ° I DB. 3813 PG. 610 2 I 2 1 26 25 �\ 1 TOP RIM= 26.84 I SSMH IN 7.06 OUT 7.16 sE9 T` 0-130 2 9 1`` �26 25.88 6 1 r 1 INV. IN= 19.78 ' �� J� � 1 26 .43 3i.r II vINV. OUT = 19.68 �_ �T @�4T ~ 0 2s 27 28 zs.96� 4 1 1 ! 26.21 26.16 GS @FENCE TBC�?FENCE TB.32 26 67 4• ` - T- TOP ti 29.14 - TOP +� 26. 6 1 26.89 26.94 27.3 z - - GS�FENCE - ECM TB 22.39 - �T2"Pif�E X47 64- -�1 1� -+ 12"PINE� I GSOFENCE x x -x x x MXx -x FL 23. 1 M 26,13 + 2fi S74'S7'02 °E ±/T0t)L/'d 504.24' + 2s 9 26.1 i �} 14 "PINE " 1 26.49 15 "PINE GS /FC 14"PINE 15 "PINE 2 ' TO 24" M I N N TT TOE + + TOE �S70'46 QO E -DEED\ TOE 14"PINE} 11'BAY 15"PINE 17'PINE 12"PINE 20 PINE � 12 "PINE+ �+-S"MAPLE T 15 "PIE 27.04 \ 16 "PINE INE 18 PINE \ 15 "PINE 8 � 12'PINE + TB �} 68 FL + ' 1 I 18 "PINE 14 "PINE 12 "PINE T 14 PINE FL 6.69 27.03 ' I N I 21.67 1 18 "PINE 16'PINE \ 12 "PINE 17"PINE 26. (j� 13"PINE 13"PINE TB 23.08 O 28 417 I I T ' 501 L N / 17 "PINE 12"PINE 14"PINE cV TOP 15 "RCP MD1.45 IE G6. 7 ' ( } " 18 PINE / 10 "MAPLE 12 "PINE 27.05 r ya \ \ 1 _3 ` 22 "PINE � ,�16 PINE 18 "PINE 12iPINE 16 "PINE 18"PINE Gs' S 26.2 \ 1 1 I J 18 " PINE' 25.95 2 PINE 12"PINE 8 "BAY 26.40 + 26 37 12 "PIN 12 "PINE r�� GS +00 0-0-0-0-0-0- + GS + / T 13"PINE G5.48 + G5 12•PINE + 26.27 GS + j } GS 88 1 "PINEY 26 26 12 "PINE 13'PINE T16"PINE Cg'05 12 PINE T ' Ol I.E.= RCP 3' 14 "PINE 16 PINE \ �'13"PINE G5 " 16 "PIN* + ' 17 "PINE / + �* l O ' \ ' 18 "PINE 12 PINE + 16"PINE 7d O BOC1 EP�2 i` \ \ F . s TB 13y 2 44 t \ 18'PINE + �J ' 20"PINE + + /r " 1 1 3. + 1+ G 15"PINE' 15-PINE \ + 12 PINE 14 "PINE 'o 18"PINE 17"PINE 14 "PINE � N � EP 4 I B 21.61 \ 14 "PINE 12'PINE T15 "PINE Is 60 + N l C1 FL +12 "PINE CD � ` 216.07 �II'' ' 27.1 I N " 15 "BAY " " ' 1GS I N \ 0) 15 PINE, �' " 18'PINE +18 "PINE 26.20 15" INE + 13 "PINE 8 OAK,1, 8 OAK 16 "PINE �IS 26.13 18"PINE 1 PINE + 16 "P NE GS + + 26.35 18"PINE 12"PINE + 26.40 t� - O � � 1 DROP INLET 13"PINE } GS +# w +25.90 I � + 12'PINE GS + G5 " 14 'PINE 12 "PINE TOP RIM= 25.90' I ' T 10 BAY " NO ' 17 "PINE GS 26.25 15 "PINE `I'10"BpY 26.26 +26.33 11 o INV. = 21.75 -- a_ \ GS " 16"PINE GS L rr; o " 16"P NE +8 "PINE 1 12 "PINE 14 PINE G5 15 "PINE p 1 18 PINE } � � � 13 "PINE 12 "PINE o 0 � y I 18 "PINE 18'FINE 14 "PINE l 25.90 LOT 28.2 s o 12 "PINE 10 "GUM " " " 13 "PINE 4 O DI DOWN 4.15 EP 2677 B \ a 15 "PINEY 12 "PINE 12 PINE " 4 /8 /6 MAPLE 15'PINE "� T p1 _, 12 MAPLE " + 1 " HIDDEBOOK 1 SECTION 1 .� 877 ' `� 1 GS I 21 4 *24 8 "qAK 1 10 GUM 15 PINE 12 PINE 26.88 15 PINE p 1 ` MAP BOOK 1 8 PAGE 50 • eoc 8 P �L 18"PINE 15 "PINE 14" INE 12'PINE 14 "PINE 14"PINE GS 25.91 a I \ GS 68 16 "PINE / 14 "PINE 14 "PINE 14"PINE� 12"PINE " 12"PINE 1 R07114-005-001 -000 MICHAEL R. GARRISON, ET AL 15'PINE + 5.26 Al + 16'PINE 26 33 14 PINE 13'PINE DB. 1990 PG. 965 ' 12 PINE ' 12 "PINE � � 16 "PINE 1 26.13 15"PINE +G5.42 12 "PINE ! 25.97 I + +3 "PINE G5 15 "PINE 19"PINE GS 13 "PINE + G5 13"PINE 13 "PINE 26.18 + + + C5 14 14 "PINE + 16"PINE T 13"PINE + `0-0-0-0-0-0- 13 "PINE +2PINE GS " 15"PINE 26.45 12 "PINE 1 B "PINE F0.91 1 16 "PINE 16" PINE " 12"PINE 13 "PINE 13 "PINE ' 1\ T r 19 "PINE GS 12 "PINE 12"PINE 1 15 PINE 12 "PINE 1 B"PINE 14"PINE ! .7 1 +1 4"PINE / 19 "PINE t-PINE 14 "PINE + + 12"PINE 12 PINE 1 2 13 "PINE 6"/9"MAP� 14 "PINE \ 28.0 G ' 12 PINE 2 I 18 "PINE 10"BAY 22"PINE 13 "PINE 13"PINE 26.70 25.98 s.71 EP 1 ' ■ GUM + 10 "BAY + " GS 14"PINE GS y P \ 1 \\ S 9'OAK 12 PINE " 12"PINE 12"PINE " 14"PINE 17"PINE 12 PIN _ + + 13 PINE T 14 "PINE 12'PINE 14 PINE \ \� GS 04 18 "PINE 13 "PINE ' 26184"PINE + G5 + " "3'PINE +� 14 "PINE 26.06 13 PINE 13 PINE 26.71 \ (SOI�) 1 ' I 13"PINE ' 10 "OAK G5 13 PINE 14 PINE 12 "PINE + 26.29 15 "PINE GS �3$5 1 1 ` 22.06 26 + GS 02 + 26.53 26 26.45 G5 12'PINE 12"PINE 12"PINE r0 r ' 1 \ FL 15'PINE GS 14"PINE 12" INE + G5 13"PINE + 26 54 * T 15�E �/ ' L.6 1 + 16 "PINE 18 PINE � T 3 "PINE + " 11 II " \ 12"PINE 12"PINE 12 PIE DROP INLET ' G\+ 1 +20-PINE \ 18 "PINE 20 PINE 14 "PINE " 14 "PINE 15 "PINE w 14"PINE TPED -/ � TOP RIM= 24.18 ` 'EP 9 20"PINE 13'PINE 15 911E 13 "PINE 112 "PINE + 26.66 1NE 1 /CM INV. = 20.43 + 1 +�f �I GW TP.33 \ 13 "PINE 17 "PINE 14-PINE / I I� +\ 12"PINE E 12"PINE + 12"PINE } GS 19"PI ' 26+` Gw � 2 6 + 12 -PINE (N70 46 00 W -DEED) 12 "PINE " T . 25.1 25.04 , 12"PINE T13 PINE 26.25 24.96 5.03 48" CMP TB 1 TB PP GW 6 {01 _ + .87+ +�7 174'57 -02 V TB 14"PINE 26.33 504.24 X26.22 18 "P 26.07 TB FL 14'PINE S I- + ED 2 3 L -23 L- 3 -�3 _23.4013 "PINE 24.30 L + 24.58 L -25.76 24.62 INV. = 20.89' L� 26. 9 - fir r,�fll i JE CIS- ri 5TA7 I + FL " + FL �� ECG DI DOWN 3.05 mmmmo� \ ` 2#7 24.77 r25- �3 23' 25.33 12 PINE 24.18 T T13 � 18 "PINE + 25.33 ' + TB- + TB + TB 25 + TB + TB + TB TB 12 G5 94 7.29 T6 06 T6.26 (SOIL 9 "GUM TB 12'GUM 25.52 25,77 (SOIL) 14 "PINE I DI DOWN 3.7 (SOIL} 20.89 48 "CMP EP EP ~ 26.04 25.56 QNQ��1 EP'38 25.18 25.83 EP I EP 25.95 �QS EP 75 HIDDEN VALLY ROAD EP 62 PUBLIC RIGHT OF es WAY VARIES IN THIS AREA 26.16 EP 25 95 ECM 7 EP 86 EP OD II \ 26.27 EP 26,20 25. 26.10 26.43 EP 26.66 Q� CIL02 25.77 _ \ ' E BOC (ASPHALT) \ 277.02 26 59 BOC 8 BOC BOC BOC BOC 2 6 EP 96 `Ac}P .6 EP � EP OD BOC \ (SOIL) 26'27 );;A,) 2422 {SOIL} - z (SOIL) PLANTED ISLAND BOC EP I z _ G 8 5 3 EP 75 I \ 7.15 OC / BOC 21 07 r� \ -r1 28.84\ � 0 EP \ I EP'B3 ' \ \ \ 28.64 ' \ EP \ \ 26.651 BOC 26.23 �= EP n ' �C 21 7----21.78 �} 1 DI 25.01 I.E. DI 24.5 DI 1 11 26.0 25.1 25.0 BOB7 25.3 EP 56 (SOIL) I.E. DI ""I `I• `III` WM WM 25.40 25.35 25.42 EP EP EP SQ��x' EP EP EP _ DROP INLET TOP RIM= 24.22' p (SOIL} 24.66 WATER LINE COPE ;ERuc1E SITE ELEVATION INV. = 21.07' " MIA BENCHMARK DI 23 99 WM 8 TOP OF MONUMENT INSIDE 4.79 D OF CASTING. WATER LINE $~ 24.11 24.87' \ WM WM 23.17 DI NAVD 86 DATUM I.E.12 "RCP DI DROP INLET TOP RIM= 25.00' INV. = 21.17' DROP INLET TOP RIM= 24.50' INV. = 21.78' DWG PATH DROP INLET TOP EAST RIM= 24.00' INV. = 23.17' TRACT AREA 3.000 Acres 130,699 sq.ft. SURVEY REFERENCES DEED BOOK 881 PAGE 263 MAP BOOK 18 PAGE 50 GIS DATA FURNISHED BY CFPUA OTHERS AS SHOWN. LEGEND ® = IRON PIPE FOUND (EIP) Q = IRON PIPE SET (IPS) O = CONC. MONUMENT FOUND (ECM) q = CENTERLINE R/W = RIGHT OF WAY )e = NON- MONUMENTED POINT (NMP) GS = GROUND SHOT '0-;- PP = POWER POLE © SSMH = SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DI = DROP INLET Cl = CURB INLET OHPL = OVER HEAD POWER LINE WM = WATER METER WV = WATER VALVE EP = EDGE of PAVEMENT INV = INVERT ELEVATION I.E. = INVERT ELEVATION NOTES 1. THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONE X PER FRIS ON FIRM MAP NUMBER # 3720313400J DATED: 4 -3 -2006 2. THIS TRACT IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS, OR COVENANTS OF RECORD. 3. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, WHICH MAY REVEAL ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCES, EASEMENTS OR RIGHT OF WAYS NOT SHOWN HEREIN. 4. ELEVATIONS BASED ON 88 DATUM. 5. BENCHMARK ELEVATIONS DETERMINED USING TOPCON SR GPS UNIT UTILIZING THE NC VRS SYSTEM. 6. NC GRID BEARINGS DERIVED USING TOPCON SR, UTILIZING NORTH CAROLINA VRS SYSTEM. 7. ALL BEARINGS ARE NC GRID, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 8. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED AND MAPPED BASED UPON ABOVE GROUND EVIDENCE. UNDERGROUND LOCATOR SERVICE RECOMMENDED BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 - 11 - 1 MB. 33 PG. 240 INV. OUT= 18.77 26.33 NI O N R071 14- 005- 008 -000 SSMH MD 7.5' -OUT 7.56' I II �� DB. 4930 PG. 2347 R E �_ ' CURB INLET #3 � ��i Ul�I� TOP RIM= 26,10' WED ;F R W INV.- 24.00' 45 PUBLIC / r �oo 1 1 ' - -T- - - - - - - - - l \ \� J _�_ �F y I I I LOT 34R 11 t +'1_1 � 1 1 1 1 l \I WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH 1 r 1 I I 4 WATER LEVEL IS ELEV. 22.s,t \ \ \\ ?� \ \\ \ / MB. 33 PG. 240 1 / I I 1 3 -3 -2015 \\ \\ + R07114-005-007-000 PATRICK & DECIA BLACKMAN 1 15' I.E. 24" GALV.= 24.20' \ 1 I e DB. 5642 PG. 637 1 1 5 �-- l \ STORM CONTROL BOX 1 1 I TOP BOX= 24.70' 1 \ 1 f r LE.18 "CPP= 22.20' I z } 1 J BOTTOM WIER= 21.45' \\ 1 5 „ F. E. S raa LOT 3 3 I I 1 1 1 1 S I.E.BOX =20.20 ' l 1� Q 1 w Ld I.E. 24" GALV.= 24.20' 6' \ 1. f INV. =20.50 1 /� 1 WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH I Ld I 1 26.28 \ �\ `� c� ■� 1 MB. 33 PG. 240 I ' I TOP 24" CMP 1' \1 • ' \\ l y ] 11 ` \`t \ 27.10 1� `- R07114 -005- 006 -000 LOT 32 '`sS�+GFENCE 1 i 1 TITUS & LINDA JOHNSON f j 1 DB. 5971 PG. 2951 WEDGEFIELD AT CROSSWINDS SOUTH ao l MB. 33 PG. 240 1 ' IF 15 1 ~ ~�` \ 1 p 1 I I R07114-005-005-000 \ FL I 5 � � . -� � � SANITARY SEWER LLOYD G NOTES, ET UX I FL +� 26 ` 25 4 - ` Ntr �5,. Opp \, 27.10 FENCE IN I MANHOLE ° I DB. 3813 PG. 610 2 I 2 1 26 25 �\ 1 TOP RIM= 26.84 I SSMH IN 7.06 OUT 7.16 sE9 T` 0-130 2 9 1`` �26 25.88 6 1 r 1 INV. IN= 19.78 ' �� J� � 1 26 .43 3i.r II vINV. OUT = 19.68 �_ �T @�4T ~ 0 2s 27 28 zs.96� 4 1 1 ! 26.21 26.16 GS @FENCE TBC�?FENCE TB.32 26 67 4• ` - T- TOP ti 29.14 - TOP +� 26. 6 1 26.89 26.94 27.3 z - - GS�FENCE - ECM TB 22.39 - �T2"Pif�E X47 64- -�1 1� -+ 12"PINE� I GSOFENCE x x -x x x MXx -x FL 23. 1 M 26,13 + 2fi S74'S7'02 °E ±/T0t)L/'d 504.24' + 2s 9 26.1 i �} 14 "PINE " 1 26.49 15 "PINE GS /FC 14"PINE 15 "PINE 2 ' TO 24" M I N N TT TOE + + TOE �S70'46 QO E -DEED\ TOE 14"PINE} 11'BAY 15"PINE 17'PINE 12"PINE 20 PINE � 12 "PINE+ �+-S"MAPLE T 15 "PIE 27.04 \ 16 "PINE INE 18 PINE \ 15 "PINE 8 � 12'PINE + TB �} 68 FL + ' 1 I 18 "PINE 14 "PINE 12 "PINE T 14 PINE FL 6.69 27.03 ' I N I 21.67 1 18 "PINE 16'PINE \ 12 "PINE 17"PINE 26. (j� 13"PINE 13"PINE TB 23.08 O 28 417 I I T ' 501 L N / 17 "PINE 12"PINE 14"PINE cV TOP 15 "RCP MD1.45 IE G6. 7 ' ( } " 18 PINE / 10 "MAPLE 12 "PINE 27.05 r ya \ \ 1 _3 ` 22 "PINE � ,�16 PINE 18 "PINE 12iPINE 16 "PINE 18"PINE Gs' S 26.2 \ 1 1 I J 18 " PINE' 25.95 2 PINE 12"PINE 8 "BAY 26.40 + 26 37 12 "PIN 12 "PINE r�� GS +00 0-0-0-0-0-0- + GS + / T 13"PINE G5.48 + G5 12•PINE + 26.27 GS + j } GS 88 1 "PINEY 26 26 12 "PINE 13'PINE T16"PINE Cg'05 12 PINE T ' Ol I.E.= RCP 3' 14 "PINE 16 PINE \ �'13"PINE G5 " 16 "PIN* + ' 17 "PINE / + �* l O ' \ ' 18 "PINE 12 PINE + 16"PINE 7d O BOC1 EP�2 i` \ \ F . s TB 13y 2 44 t \ 18'PINE + �J ' 20"PINE + + /r " 1 1 3. + 1+ G 15"PINE' 15-PINE \ + 12 PINE 14 "PINE 'o 18"PINE 17"PINE 14 "PINE � N � EP 4 I B 21.61 \ 14 "PINE 12'PINE T15 "PINE Is 60 + N l C1 FL +12 "PINE CD � ` 216.07 �II'' ' 27.1 I N " 15 "BAY " " ' 1GS I N \ 0) 15 PINE, �' " 18'PINE +18 "PINE 26.20 15" INE + 13 "PINE 8 OAK,1, 8 OAK 16 "PINE �IS 26.13 18"PINE 1 PINE + 16 "P NE GS + + 26.35 18"PINE 12"PINE + 26.40 t� - O � � 1 DROP INLET 13"PINE } GS +# w +25.90 I � + 12'PINE GS + G5 " 14 'PINE 12 "PINE TOP RIM= 25.90' I ' T 10 BAY " NO ' 17 "PINE GS 26.25 15 "PINE `I'10"BpY 26.26 +26.33 11 o INV. = 21.75 -- a_ \ GS " 16"PINE GS L rr; o " 16"P NE +8 "PINE 1 12 "PINE 14 PINE G5 15 "PINE p 1 18 PINE } � � � 13 "PINE 12 "PINE o 0 � y I 18 "PINE 18'FINE 14 "PINE l 25.90 LOT 28.2 s o 12 "PINE 10 "GUM " " " 13 "PINE 4 O DI DOWN 4.15 EP 2677 B \ a 15 "PINEY 12 "PINE 12 PINE " 4 /8 /6 MAPLE 15'PINE "� T p1 _, 12 MAPLE " + 1 " HIDDEBOOK 1 SECTION 1 .� 877 ' `� 1 GS I 21 4 *24 8 "qAK 1 10 GUM 15 PINE 12 PINE 26.88 15 PINE p 1 ` MAP BOOK 1 8 PAGE 50 • eoc 8 P �L 18"PINE 15 "PINE 14" INE 12'PINE 14 "PINE 14"PINE GS 25.91 a I \ GS 68 16 "PINE / 14 "PINE 14 "PINE 14"PINE� 12"PINE " 12"PINE 1 R07114-005-001 -000 MICHAEL R. GARRISON, ET AL 15'PINE + 5.26 Al + 16'PINE 26 33 14 PINE 13'PINE DB. 1990 PG. 965 ' 12 PINE ' 12 "PINE � � 16 "PINE 1 26.13 15"PINE +G5.42 12 "PINE ! 25.97 I + +3 "PINE G5 15 "PINE 19"PINE GS 13 "PINE + G5 13"PINE 13 "PINE 26.18 + + + C5 14 14 "PINE + 16"PINE T 13"PINE + `0-0-0-0-0-0- 13 "PINE +2PINE GS " 15"PINE 26.45 12 "PINE 1 B "PINE F0.91 1 16 "PINE 16" PINE " 12"PINE 13 "PINE 13 "PINE ' 1\ T r 19 "PINE GS 12 "PINE 12"PINE 1 15 PINE 12 "PINE 1 B"PINE 14"PINE ! .7 1 +1 4"PINE / 19 "PINE t-PINE 14 "PINE + + 12"PINE 12 PINE 1 2 13 "PINE 6"/9"MAP� 14 "PINE \ 28.0 G ' 12 PINE 2 I 18 "PINE 10"BAY 22"PINE 13 "PINE 13"PINE 26.70 25.98 s.71 EP 1 ' ■ GUM + 10 "BAY + " GS 14"PINE GS y P \ 1 \\ S 9'OAK 12 PINE " 12"PINE 12"PINE " 14"PINE 17"PINE 12 PIN _ + + 13 PINE T 14 "PINE 12'PINE 14 PINE \ \� GS 04 18 "PINE 13 "PINE ' 26184"PINE + G5 + " "3'PINE +� 14 "PINE 26.06 13 PINE 13 PINE 26.71 \ (SOI�) 1 ' I 13"PINE ' 10 "OAK G5 13 PINE 14 PINE 12 "PINE + 26.29 15 "PINE GS �3$5 1 1 ` 22.06 26 + GS 02 + 26.53 26 26.45 G5 12'PINE 12"PINE 12"PINE r0 r ' 1 \ FL 15'PINE GS 14"PINE 12" INE + G5 13"PINE + 26 54 * T 15�E �/ ' L.6 1 + 16 "PINE 18 PINE � T 3 "PINE + " 11 II " \ 12"PINE 12"PINE 12 PIE DROP INLET ' G\+ 1 +20-PINE \ 18 "PINE 20 PINE 14 "PINE " 14 "PINE 15 "PINE w 14"PINE TPED -/ � TOP RIM= 24.18 ` 'EP 9 20"PINE 13'PINE 15 911E 13 "PINE 112 "PINE + 26.66 1NE 1 /CM INV. = 20.43 + 1 +�f �I GW TP.33 \ 13 "PINE 17 "PINE 14-PINE / I I� +\ 12"PINE E 12"PINE + 12"PINE } GS 19"PI ' 26+` Gw � 2 6 + 12 -PINE (N70 46 00 W -DEED) 12 "PINE " T . 25.1 25.04 , 12"PINE T13 PINE 26.25 24.96 5.03 48" CMP TB 1 TB PP GW 6 {01 _ + .87+ +�7 174'57 -02 V TB 14"PINE 26.33 504.24 X26.22 18 "P 26.07 TB FL 14'PINE S I- + ED 2 3 L -23 L- 3 -�3 _23.4013 "PINE 24.30 L + 24.58 L -25.76 24.62 INV. = 20.89' L� 26. 9 - fir r,�fll i JE CIS- ri 5TA7 I + FL " + FL �� ECG DI DOWN 3.05 mmmmo� \ ` 2#7 24.77 r25- �3 23' 25.33 12 PINE 24.18 T T13 � 18 "PINE + 25.33 ' + TB- + TB + TB 25 + TB + TB + TB TB 12 G5 94 7.29 T6 06 T6.26 (SOIL 9 "GUM TB 12'GUM 25.52 25,77 (SOIL) 14 "PINE I DI DOWN 3.7 (SOIL} 20.89 48 "CMP EP EP ~ 26.04 25.56 QNQ��1 EP'38 25.18 25.83 EP I EP 25.95 �QS EP 75 HIDDEN VALLY ROAD EP 62 PUBLIC RIGHT OF es WAY VARIES IN THIS AREA 26.16 EP 25 95 ECM 7 EP 86 EP OD II \ 26.27 EP 26,20 25. 26.10 26.43 EP 26.66 Q� CIL02 25.77 _ \ ' E BOC (ASPHALT) \ 277.02 26 59 BOC 8 BOC BOC BOC BOC 2 6 EP 96 `Ac}P .6 EP � EP OD BOC \ (SOIL) 26'27 );;A,) 2422 {SOIL} - z (SOIL) PLANTED ISLAND BOC EP I z _ G 8 5 3 EP 75 I \ 7.15 OC / BOC 21 07 r� \ -r1 28.84\ � 0 EP \ I EP'B3 ' \ \ \ 28.64 ' \ EP \ \ 26.651 BOC 26.23 �= EP n ' �C 21 7----21.78 �} 1 DI 25.01 I.E. DI 24.5 DI 1 11 26.0 25.1 25.0 BOB7 25.3 EP 56 (SOIL) I.E. DI ""I `I• `III` WM WM 25.40 25.35 25.42 EP EP EP SQ��x' EP EP EP _ DROP INLET TOP RIM= 24.22' p (SOIL} 24.66 WATER LINE COPE ;ERuc1E SITE ELEVATION INV. = 21.07' " MIA BENCHMARK DI 23 99 WM 8 TOP OF MONUMENT INSIDE 4.79 D OF CASTING. WATER LINE $~ 24.11 24.87' \ WM WM 23.17 DI NAVD 86 DATUM I.E.12 "RCP DI DROP INLET TOP RIM= 25.00' INV. = 21.17' DROP INLET TOP RIM= 24.50' INV. = 21.78' DWG PATH DROP INLET TOP EAST RIM= 24.00' INV. = 23.17' TRACT AREA 3.000 Acres 130,699 sq.ft. SURVEY REFERENCES DEED BOOK 881 PAGE 263 MAP BOOK 18 PAGE 50 GIS DATA FURNISHED BY CFPUA OTHERS AS SHOWN. PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 9 -12-1 HdUULN VALILtY KUAU Wilmington, NC mmissioners - ITEM: 9 - 13 - 1 SCALE 1" = 20' 0 10 20 40 JOB #101 -550 FEBRUARY 07, 2020 z U O U �u Z Q J f► W U Z O U Z NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Planning PRESENTER(S): Ken Vafier, Planning Supervisor CONTACT(S): Ken Vafier; Wayne Clark, Planning & Land Use Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Rezoning Request (Z20 -11) - Request by Lee Kaess, PLLC on Behalf of the Property Owner, Lester R. and Suzanne B. Edwards, to Rezone Approximately 2.18 Acres of Land Located in the 100 Block of Forest Lane, Adjacent to the Intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. 23rd Street, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) O &I, Conditional Office and Institutional District, to Operate a Personal Services and Office Establishment BRIEF SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone 2.18 acres from R -15 to (CZD) 0&1 in order to convert an existing single - family dwelling unit for personal services and offices for private business and professional activities. The 3,601 sf structure is proposed to be used primarily for a spa, salon, and barber /beauty shop, and the request includes the potential to include a private office in the future. The site is comprised of two tracts; a 1.84 acre tract south of Forest Lane where the business is proposed, and a 0.34 acre tract on the north side of Forest Lane which will be converted to a parking area for the use. Access to Castle Hayne Road is provided via Forest Lane, which is an existing private drive which will be required to be widened and improved to meet minimum width and sight - triangle standards. The primary proposal to use the building entirely as a salon is anticipated to generate approximately 4 AM peak hour and 5 PM peak hour vehicular trips. This results in an approximate increase of 3 AM peak hour and 4 PM peak hour trips from what is anticipated to be generated under the existing zoning district. With the potential inclusion of a single- tenant office in the future, the use may generate approximately 23 AM peak hour and 33 PM peak hour trips, which results in an anticipated increase of 22 AM peak hour and 32 PM peak hour trips from what is anticipated to be generated under the existing zoning district. Forest Lane currently functions as a dead end private drive, and the applicant owns all parcels fronting it with the exception of one - single family dwelling to the west of the proposed site. The 0&1 district is the least intense commercial zoning district and typically functions as a transition between residential areas and more intense commercial areas. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan anticipated that a number of single - family homes adjacent to Castle Hayne Road would transition to commercial uses in the future, and the proposal is a moderate transition to a salon and office use. Reuse of the existing structure as proposed maintains compatibility with the immediate area, and any future proposal to replace the structure would be classified as a major modification and would be subject to completing the full conditional rezoning process, which includes Planning Board recommendation and consideration by the Board of Commissioners. There are similar areas where homes have transitioned to low- intensity commercial uses in the City of Wilmington along Oleander Drive east of Pine Grove Drive and Wrightsville Avenue east of College Road. The proposed (CZD) 0&1 district is generally CONSISTENT with the goals of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas and provides an appropriate transition between adjacent single - family neighborhoods and an existing commercial node. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10 The Planning Board considered this application at their June 4, 2020 meeting. No one from the public spoke in support or in opposition to the request. The applicant proposed the following conditions: The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from Sam to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. The Planning Board recommended approval (7 -0) of the application with conditions, finding it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. In addition, the proposal provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. The board also found that recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the nearby commercial and retail operations. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Staff recommends APPROVAL of this application as stated in the Planning Board action and suggests the following motion: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 0&1 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. In addition, the proposal provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. I also find recommending APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the nearby commercial and retail operations. Conditions: 1. The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. 2. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from Sam to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Recommended approval with conditions as presented by staff. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Approved with 5 revised conditions 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10 SCRIPT for Conditional Zoning District Application (Z20 -1 1) Request by Lee Kaess, PLLC on behalf of the property owner, Lester R. and Suzanne B. Edwards, to rezone approximately 2.18 acres of land located in the 100 block of Forest Lane, adjacent to the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. 23rd Street, from R -15, Residential District, to (CZD) 08x1, Conditional Office and Institutional District, to operate a personal services and office establishment. 1. This is a public hearing. We will hear a presentation from staff. Then the applicant and any opponents will each be allowed 15 minutes for their presentation and additional 5 minutes for rebuttal. 2. Conduct Hearing, as follows: a. Staff presentation b. Applicant's presentation (up to 15 minutes) c. Opponent's presentation (up to 15 minutes) d. Applicant's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) e. Opponent's rebuttal (up to 5 minutes) 3. Close the public hearing 4. Board discussion 5. Vote on the application. The motion should include a statement saying how the change is, or is not, consistent with the land use plan and why approval or denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest. Example Motion for Approval I move to APPROVE the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 0&1 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. In addition, the proposal provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the nearby commercial and retail operations. [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: 1 . The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. 2. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from 8am to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 1 - 1 Example Motion for Denial I move to DENY the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 0&1 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas, I find DENIAL of the rezoning request because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community. Alternative Motion for Approval /Denial: I move to [Approve /Deny] the proposed rezoning to a conditional (CZD) 0&1 district. I find it to be [Consistent /Inconsistent] with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because [insert reasons] I also find [Approval /Denial] of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because [insert reasons] Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 1 - 2 STAFF REPORT FOR Z20 -11 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION APPLICATION SUMMARY Case Number: Z20 -1 1 Request: Rezone from R -15 to (CZD) 0&1 for Personal Services and Offices for Private Business & Professional Activities Applicant: Property Owner(s): Amy Schaefer of Lee Kaess, PLLC Lester and Suzanne Edwards Location: Acreage: 102 Forest Lane 2.18 acres PID(s): Place Type: R04107 -006- 001 -000 Community Mixed Use R04107- 007 - 001 -000 Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Residential, Recreation Personal Services, Offices for Private Business & Professional Activities Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: R -15 (CZD) 0&1 SURROUNDING AREA LAND USE ZONING North Commercial, Single Family Residential, undeveloped R -15, 0&1 East Commercial (retail) B -1, B -2, 0&1 South Residential, Undeveloped R -15 West Residential R -15 Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 1 Page 1 of 14 Aerial {� .FOREST -. _. vNirmfor -t . F ,.'y ZONING HISTORY July 1, 1972 Initially zoned R -15 (Area 9A) dew Hanover�Cownty COMMUNITY SERVICES Water /Sewer Water is available and connected through CFPUA; wastewater is on -site Historic septic Fire Protection New Hanover County Fire Services, New Hanover County Northern Fire District, Wrightsboro Station Schools Wrightsboro Elementary, Holly Shelter Middle, and New Hanover High schools Recreation Optimist Park, Castle Hayne Park CONSERVATION, HISTORIC, & ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Conservation No known conservation resources Historic No known historic resources Archaeological No known archaeological resources Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Page 2 of 14 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 2 PROPOSED USE AND CONCEPTUAL PLAN • The applicant is proposing to convert an existing single - family dwelling unit located on 1.84 acres for personal services and offices for private business and professional activities. The site is located just west of the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. 23rd St. • The 3,601 sf structure is proposed to be used primarily for a spa, salon, and barber /beauty shop under the land use Personal Services as defined in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). In addition, the applicant has requested that the land use Offices for Private Business and Professional Activities be included as part of the conditional rezoning request in order to accommodate a potential private office in the future. • An adjacent 0.34 -acre tract on the north side of Forest Lane, currently used as an equestrian course, will be converted to a paved parking area to serve the salon. A landscaped strip with a minimum width of 10' will be installed on the boundaries of the parking lot parcel with the residentially zoned properties to the north and west. • Streetyard landscaping will be installed along Forest Lane on both parcels as required by the UDO. In addition, a 31.08' wide side yard and 42.15' rear yard buffer will be installed or provided via existing vegetation on the remaining boundaries of the parcel containing the structure. • The New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance requires stormwater management for any new impervious area that exceeds 10,000 sf. As the addition of the parking area totals 9,208 sf of new impervious area, no stormwater improvements are required. • The proposal is to utilize the existing structure in its current state with potential other modifications to make the structure compliant with commercial building code requirements. Should a proposal to replace or alter the building be proposed subsequent to approval of this conditional request, the proposal will be evaluated pursuant to Section 10.3.3 C (7)(b) of the UDO which governs modifications to conditional zoning districts. In the event that a future proposal to replace the structure with a building which exceeds 10% of 3,601 sf (360 sf maximum increase), the proposal would be classified as a major modification and would be subject to completing the full conditional rezoning process, which includes Planning Board recommendation and consideration by the Board of Commissioners. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 3 Page 3 of 14 t � h =Rered Parking Lot CO andscapin g Tract 2: Parking Area f Forest Lane to be — widened to 24' was - -_ m -ate GO f L i r -=" L_ ii. : Wes•"" �wa� °ip`.w"+crxw'°' +...w j Tract 1 : Existing e Structure and Site A a. y. �!�.oRrVre .r► Conceptual site plan for the proposed development with staff markups Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.1 3.2020 Page 4 of 14 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 4 AREA SUBDIVISIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT 11 I L - �r i Riverside Riverside T- T-- Apartments _ KERR!N _ Wrightsboro Commons Windy Woods ' ? Hanover Lakes `~ Lid' -4 Z Preservation Poirtt i Z20-1 1 City of �\ ; v' Wilmington fr ITIW..L Preservation Point (SF) 150 0 150 Hanover Lakes (SF) 231 107 124 Windy Woods (SF) 56 0 56 Wrightsboro Commons (MF) 226 0 226 Rivcrsidc (SF) 166 0 166 Riverside Apts (M'F) 72 0 72 Total 1 901 1 1071 794 "Based on Building Permits and Aerial Photography — Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 5 Page 5 of 14 TRANSPORTATION • Direct access to Castle Hayne Road is provided to the site via Forest Lane, which is a private drive consisting of a 15' asphalt travel surface within a 60' private right -of -way. • NHC Fire Services has indicated that Forest Lane will need to be improved to 24' in travel width, and the sight triangle at the intersection with Castle Hayne Road will need to be improved. Similarly, NCDOT is requiring that the entrance to Forest Lane from Castle Hayne road be brought to commercial standards which include clearing obstructions within sight triangles to provide sufficient sight distance. • NCDOT will also require a driveway permit to connect to Castle Hayne Road, and will require an encroachment agreement for any utility connections or installation within the NCDOT right -of -way, though no encroachments are proposed at this time. -_ - - -_ Z20-11 f I i 1 7- - - - -- z r' y c� f f 23rd St Castle Hayne Rd Gordan Rd Tfl LM Got Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Primary Routes to Arterial Roadways Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 6 Page 6 of 14 • The primary proposal to use the building entirely as a salon is anticipated to generate approximately 4 AM peak hour and 5 PM peak hour vehicular trips. With the potential inclusion of a single- tenant office in the future, the use may generate approximately 23 AM peak hour and 33 PM peak hour trips. Either scenario falls below the 100 AM or PM peak hour threshold required to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Comparison of Potential Tria Generation Scenarios • Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for Castle Hayne Road near the subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. • Traffic counts indicate that the roads south of the subject site (Castle Hayne Road and N 23rd St.) are operating below capacity, while the segment of Castle Hayne Road north of the subject parcel is over capacity. However, there have not been any recent Traffic Impact Analyses that have analyzed the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N 23rd St. Future NCDOT improvements to the roadways in the near vicinity of this project are expected to accommodate the current and projected traffic volumes. NCDOT Average Annual Dailv Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Intensity Approx. Peak Hour Trips Existing Development: Single - Family Residential 1 AM/ 1 PM Development under 15,000 14,400 Proposed (CZD) 0&1 3,601 sf salon /spa 4 AM / 5 PM Zoning: Development under Proposed (CZD) O &I Salon /Spa w/ Single- tenant 23 AM / 33 PM Zoning: Office S of intersection of Forest Net Change under Salon /Spa + 3 AM / + 4 PM Proposed (CZD) 0&1 Salon /Spa w/ Single- tenant +22 AM / +32 PM Zoning: Office N. 23rd St. • Because a TIA is not required to analyze transportation impacts, staff has provided the volume to capacity ratio for Castle Hayne Road near the subject site. While volume to capacity ratio, based on average daily trips, can provide a general idea of the function of adjacent roadways, the delay vehicles take in seconds to pass through intersections is generally considered a more effective measure when determining the Level of Service of a roadway. • Traffic counts indicate that the roads south of the subject site (Castle Hayne Road and N 23rd St.) are operating below capacity, while the segment of Castle Hayne Road north of the subject parcel is over capacity. However, there have not been any recent Traffic Impact Analyses that have analyzed the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N 23rd St. Future NCDOT improvements to the roadways in the near vicinity of this project are expected to accommodate the current and projected traffic volumes. NCDOT Average Annual Dailv Traffic (AADT) - 2018 Road Location Volume Capacity V/C N of intersection of Forest 15,000 14,400 1.04 Castle Hayne Road Lane and Castle Hayne Road S of intersection of Forest 9,300 14,440 0.64 Land and Castle Hayne Road N. 23rd St. SE of intersection with Castle 8,200 15,400 0.53 Hayne Road Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 7 Page 7 of 14 Nearby Planned Transportation Improvements and Traffic Impact Analyses Traffic Impact Analyses Approved Under Review Under Draft 220 -1 1 Preservation Point TIA Approved h� - -��_�• STIP Project STIP Project U -5863 1rr t STIP Project U -5954 TIA Approved 11 Mile Radius U 0-KOVOW24- �—J=I bw Nearby NC STIP Projects: • STIP Project U -5863 • Project to widen Castle Hayne Road from 1 -140 to Division Drive. • Right -of -Way acquisition for the project is scheduled for 2021, with construction scheduled to begin in 2024. • STIP Project U -5954 • Project to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and N. 23rd Street. • Right -of -Way acquisition for the project is scheduled for 2022, with construction scheduled to begin in 2024. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 8 Page 8 of 14 • The production schedule for the Castle Hayne widening and N 23,d St. roundabout projects were to begin right -of -way acquisition in 2021 and 2022, respectively, with construction to begin in 2024. However, both of these projects are currently on hold for the foreseeable future due to the impacts of COVID -1 9. Nearby Traffic Impact Analyses: Traffic Impact Analyses are completed in accordance with the WMPO and NCDOT standards. Approved analyses will expire if the proposed development is not completed by the build out date established within the TIA. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 9 Page 9 of 14 Phase I: • 123 single - family dwellings • 27 multi - family dwellings Full Build: • 123 single - family dwellings • TIA approved August 21, • 27 multi - family dwellings 2019 1. Preservation Point • 5,000 sf day -care center • Phase I — 2022 Build Out • 3,000 sf high- turnover Year restaurant • 2023 Full Build Out Year • 2,000 sf drive thru coffee /donut shop • 20- employee office building The TIA requires improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Installation of a continuous eastbound left turn lane, installation of an eastbound right turn lane, and install stop controlled T- intersection at Castle Hayne Road and site access. • Installation of an additional eastbound right turn lane at the signalized intersection with Castle Hayne Road and Division Drive. Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • None Development Status: Preliminary Plat for Phase I approved in October 2019. Site work is currently underway. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 9 Page 9 of 14 Proposed Development Land Use /Intensity TIA Status 2. Wrightsboro • Phase 1: 216 multi - family Commons (CBR units • Approved January 24, 2019 Castle Hayne) — Residential Portion of Phase 2: 144 multi - family • 2023 Build Out Year Subject Site units The TIA required improvements be completed at certain intersections in the area. The notable improvements consisted of: • Updating the signal timing at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and North Kerr Avenue Nearby Proposed Developments included within the TIA: • Riverside Development Development Status: Conditional rezoning request approved for the project in October 2019. Construction of the project has not yet begun. ENVIRONMENTAL • The site does not contain any Special Flood Hazard Areas, wetlands, or Natural Heritage Areas. The subject property is located within the Smith Creek watershed, which drains to the NE Cape Fear River. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 10 Page 10 of 14 CONTEXT AND COMPATIBILITY • Forest Lane currently functions as a dead end private drive, and the applicant owns all parcels fronting it with the exception of one single family dwelling to the west of the proposed site. • The 0&1 district is the least intense commercial zoning district and typically functions as a transition between residential areas and more intense commercial areas. • The Comprehensive Land Use Plan anticipated that a number of single - family homes adjacent to Castle Hayne Road would transition to commercial uses in the future, and the proposal is a moderate transition to a salon and office use. • Reuse of the existing structure as proposed maintains compatibility with the immediate area, and any future proposal to replace the structure would be classified as a major modification and would be subject to completing the full conditional rezoning process, which includes Planning Board recommendation and consideration by the Board of Commissioners. • There are similar areas where homes have transitioned to low- intensity commercial uses in the City of Wilmington along Oleander Drive east of Pine Grove Drive and Wrightsville Avenue east of College Road. Oleander Dr east of Pine Grove Dr Converted Residential Structure — Wrightsville Ave Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Converted Residential Structure — Oleander Dr Converted Residential Structure — Wrightsville Ave Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 11 Page 11 of 14 2016 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The New Hanover County Future Land Use Map provides a general representation of the vision for New Hanover County's future land use, as designated by place types describing the character and function of the different types of development that make up the community. These place types are intended to identify general areas for particular development patterns and should not be interpreted as being parcel specific. Place Types.,r s X57 w ENERAL� RESIDENTIAL -MIXED USE,,; � �r New Hanover County, NC Future Land Use Map Place Type Community Mixed Use Focuses on small - scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve Place Type all modes of travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. Description Types of appropriate uses include office, retail, mixed use, recreational, commercial, institutional, and multi - family and single - family residential. The subject site is located at the intersection of Castle Hayne Road and North 23rd Street, directly across from an existing commercial and retail node and immediately adjacent to residential properties to the west along Forest Lane. The property is also adjacent to existing residential properties to the south and west off Victoria Drive, and office /retail and vacant land to the north. The site is designated as a Community Mixed Use place type, which Consistency promotes community scale office and professional services and the Analysis revitalization of commercial corridors through infill and redevelopment. This designation was applied because the Comprehensive Plan anticipated the gradual conversion of existing single family homes to commercial and mixed use along the Castle Hayne Road corridor. Community Mixed Use is a common place type along major roadway corridors because it provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. Low intensity commercial and office uses that provide services for nearby residents are also appropriate in this area because of its location at an existing commercial node. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 12 Page 12 of 14 PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their June 4, 2020 meeting. No one from the public spoke in support or in opposition to the request. However, as a result of an ongoing dialogue between the applicant and an adjacent property owner, the applicant did propose the following conditions, which the Planning Board recommended approval (7 -0) of: 1. The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. 2. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from 8am to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The proposal is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Mixed Use place type as it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 0&1 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. In addition, the proposal provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the nearby commercial and retail operations. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 13 Page 13 of 14 The proposed conditional zoning district would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the adjacent commercial and retail operations. In addition, the Office and Institutional zoning district is identified in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan as one of the zoning districts typical for a Community Mixed Use area. The proposed (CZD) 0&1 district is generally CONSISTENT with the goals Consistency of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning Recommendation designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas and provides an appropriate transition between adjacent single family neighborhoods and an existing commercial node. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board considered this application at their June 4, 2020 meeting. No one from the public spoke in support or in opposition to the request. However, as a result of an ongoing dialogue between the applicant and an adjacent property owner, the applicant did propose the following conditions, which the Planning Board recommended approval (7 -0) of: 1. The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. 2. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from 8am to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The proposal is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Mixed Use place type as it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this application and suggests the following motion: I move to APPROVE of the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 0&1 district. I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas. In addition, the proposal provides for a transition between existing lower intensity residential neighborhoods and highly traveled roads. I also find APPROVAL of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest because it would allow for office and service uses in line with the vision for this area and would be compatible with the nearby commercial and retail operations. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 13 Page 13 of 14 [Optional] Note any conditions to be added to the district: I. The property shall not be used for a tattoo parlor, shoe or clothing repair, or a drop off laundry. 2. The hours of operation for all businesses other than the beauty salon shall be from 8am to 7pm with no Sunday hours. 3. There shall be no amplified outdoor music on the property. Example Motion for Denial I move to recommend DENIAL the proposed rezoning to a (CZD) 081 district. While I find it to be CONSISTENT with the purposes and intent of the Comprehensive Plan because it provides for the zoning designation and uses outlined for Community Mixed Use areas, I find recommending DENIAL of the rezoning request because the proposal is not consistent with the desired character of the surrounding community. Z20 -1 1 Staff Summary 7.13.2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 2 - 14 Page 14 of 14 Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z20 -11 102 Forest Ln R -15 /Single Family Home (CZD) O &I /Personal Services & Offices for Private Business and rV r Professional Activities _ f ! AR R'20, 4 Subject Site --- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- R -15 O &1 IV, - �fi�REST LN C'1� B -2 i� �V1CroRranD_ !� B -1 500_4_,._._ CZDB =1 Feet ` oard of Commissi ITEM: A -f LN Zoning Districts A -1 EDZD E PD R -20S SC AR 1 -1 R -10 R -7 B -1 ■ 1 -2 R -15 RA B -2 0&1 R -20 ■ RFMU ® Indicates Conditional Use District (CUD) Indicates Conditional Zoning District (CZD) COD See Section 55.1 of the Zoning Ordinance Incorporated Areas a m SHOD Case: Z20 -11 500 Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: 102 Forest Ln R -15 /Single Family Home (CZD) O &I /Personal Services & Offices for Private Business and Professional Activities Subject Site GENERAL RESIDENTIAL Feet ING j RK N of Commissib ; ¢ July 13, 2020 i ITEM: � J�OtC 1 EMPLOYMENT CENTER Place Types COMMERCE ZONE EMPLOYMENT CENTER GENERAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN MIXED USE COMMUNITY MIXED USE RURAL RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION Case: Site Address: Existing Zoning/Use: Proposed Use/Zoning: Z20 -11 102 Forest Ln R -15 /Single Family Home (CZD) O &I /Personal Services & Offices for Private Business and Professional Activities —I F11 500 - 12812~ • • —127 • ~YOIIKrOWN.DR/ 122 • Subject Site FOREsr'tl 106 • 1932`--__ 1923 • 1930 X1930 • ` -120 1930 • 1930 Z • 1930 1915 1930 • • 1930 1930 1930 1909 • 0 0 1930= 1908 • • 1901 • 1900 • I Zt5 119 117 • 15 113 14 +10 1 *67i ��� Feet E] Neigh �• '� 1816 • 1809 ViV 1808 ly 13, 2020 �V • • !2824'--- \282\ • 2824 2824 2824 282 i� 2824 • X824 • • w 1 r 817 `2824 •/� 2824p 2824 2824 2824 • 2824 • 2824 2824.2824r 1824 2824 282. 1820 • 282d • • 2817 2824 2824 2824 R -20 O &i j� d AR a Site - R -1 B -2 �v B -1 -1 4L� Inf1 �p ITY, APPLICANT MATERIALS Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 6 - 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & LAND USE 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 WilmingtoN North .Carolina .2 8403 Teiepfione (910) 798 -7165 FAX (910)798 -7053 planningdevelopment.nhcgov.aorn 1- Applicant and Property Owner. Information auul.¢4r rrvperry wormanon /Address /Lorurdon 102 Forest Lane, Wilm Total Parcal(s) Acreage 2.18 acres Parcel Identiicatiion.Nurnt er(s) NC 28401 R04107 -006 -6601 -000 & R04107 -007- 001 -000 Existing Zoning and Use( &) Future Land Use Classification R -15 singie.family 0&1 Page 1 of 5 Board of CommissioneMnd*nWZ&% District Application — Updated 02 -2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 1 a. rrvpueess 4ugionur.uset3jj a nearranve Proposed Conditional Zoning District: Total Acreage of Proposed District. Please list the uses that will be allowed within fhe,proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a proied narrulive (othrch additional -pages if,necessary). Note: Only uses allowed by right In the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Condltional Zoning •District. See .attached. 4. Proposed Condifion(s) Note: Within a Conditlonal Zoning District, additional conditions sand requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use.district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist In mitigating the .Impacts the-proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board,.and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. See attached. 3. Traffic impact Please provide the estimated number of trips generated for the proposed use(s) bosed off the most recent version of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, A Trafficimpact,Aoalysis.(TtA) must be completed for all proposed developments that generate more than 1,60 peak hour Wtp'&,.arrd the TIA must be included-with this appheat on: 1TE Land Use: 4,�, �� rMnat ��F�cc .�f s..1.r S Trip Generation Use.and. Variable (gooss.floor'area, dwelling units, etc.) %Fw+l Cy AM Peak Hour Trips: n- - v PM Peak Houf:Tripm -1- $ ' o Page 2 of 5 Board of CommissionersC-ohdiftdaa9 ding District Application — Updated 02 -2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 2 6. Conditional Zoning District Considerations The Conditional Zoning. District procedure is established to address sductlons where a particular land use would be consistent with the New Hanover County 2016 Comprehensive Plan arid` the objectives outlined 1n the Unified Development Ordinaries and where only a specific use or uses is proposed. The Oroceclure is Intended prlmarlly for use with transitions between zoning districts of dissimilar character where a particular use. uses, with restrictive conditions to safeguard adjacent land uses; can create a more orderly transition benefiting all affected parties and the community at- large. The applicant. must explain, with reference to attached plans (where.applicable), how the proposed Conditional Zoning district meets the following. criteria. 1. How. would the requested change be consistent v lfh the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. See attached 2. Maw would the requested Conditional Zoning .district be consistent with the property's.classiification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Viand Use Map. See attached. 3. What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the.original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses pwrrirlfed under the existing zoning? See attached. Page 3 of 5 Board of CommissionerK:04INO�61 iRAO District Application — updated 02 -2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 3 Staff will use the following checklist to determine the completeness of your application. Please verify oil of the fisted items are included and confirm by initialling under "Applicant Initial'. If an item is not applicable, mark as "N /A ". Applications determined to be Incomplete must be corrected In order to be processed for further review, Staff will confirm if an application is complete within five business days of submittal. kit App6cmf hi" Sf fi b"W ❑ This application form, completed and signed — �,..f��✓ ❑ Application fee: • 0600 for 5 acres or less • OW for more than 5 acres • $300 In addition to base fee for applications requiring TRC review —, V, ❑ Community meeting written summary h� ❑ Traffic impact analysis (if applicable) '1 01 A ❑ Legal description (by metes and bounds) or recorded survey Map Book and Page Reference of the property requested for rezoning�,� ❑ She Plan including the following elements: • Tract boundaries and total area, location of adjoining parcels and roads • Proposed use of land, structures and other improvements o For residential uses, this shall include number, height, and type of units; area to be occupied by each structure; and /or subdivided boundaries. o For non - residential uses, this shall include approximate square footage and height of each structure, an outline of the area it will occupy, and the specific purposes for which it will be used. • Development schedule, including proposed phasing • Traffic and parking plan; including a statement of impact concerning local traffic near the tract; proposed right -of -way dedicotiont plans for access to and from the tract; location, width, and right -of -way for Internal streets and locations; arrangement and access provisions for parking areas All existing and proposed easements, reservations, required setbacks, rights - of-way, buffering, and signage • The location of Special Flood Hazard Areas, if applicable Location, species, and size (DBH) of regulated trees Any additional conditions and requirements that represent greater restrictions on development and use of the tract than the corresponding glewrol use disTrict regulations or additional illmitations on iond that may be regulated by state law or local ordinance ❑ One (1) hard copy of ALL documents AND 5 hard copies of the site plan. Additional hard copies may be required by staff depending on the size of the document /site plan. ❑ One (1) digital PDF copy of ALL documents AND plans Page 4 of 5 Board of CommissionersC-ohdHidr&VMng District Application -- Updated 02 -2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 4 7. Acknowledgemenf and Signafures By my signature below, I understand and accept all of the conditions, limitations, and obligations of the Conditional Zoning District zoning for which I am applying. I understand that the existing Official ironing Map is presumed to be correct. I certify that this application is complete and that all information presented in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, Information, and belief. If applicable, I also appoint the applicant /agent as listed on this application to represent me and make decisions on my behalf regarding this application during the review process. The applicant /agent Is hereby authorized on my behalf to: 1. Submit an application Including all required supplemental information and materials; 2. Appear at public hearings to give representation and comments; and 3. Act on my behalf without limitations with regard to any and all things directly or indirectly connected with r ri out of this application. Signature of top" Ow s) Print Names) AM'j r. - ez-2., "-1Y) a e Print ame Note: This form must be signed by the owner(s) of record. If there are multiple property owners, a signature is required for each owner of record. If an applicant requests delay of consideration from the Planning Board or Board of County Commissioners before notice has been sent to the newspaper, the item will be calendared for the next meeting and no fee will be required. If delay is requested after notice has been seat to the newspaper, the Board will act on the request at the scheduled meeting and are under no obligation to grant the continuance. If the continuance is granted, a fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule as published on the New Hanover County Planning website will be required. Page 5 of 5 Board of Commissioners Mdr''bl g District Application — Updated 02 -2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 5 3.Proposed Zoning, Use(s), & Narrative Please list the uses that will be allowed within the proposed Conditional Zoning District, the purpose of the district, and a project narrative (attach additional pages if necessary). Note: Only uses allowed by right in the corresponding General Use District are eligible for consideration within a Conditional Zoning District. This conditional district rezoning request seeks to allow barber/beauty shop, spa, personal services, and offices for private business & professional activities uses in the Office and Institutional District with specific conditions to assist in mitigating any potential adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The purpose of the Office and Institutional District shall be to provide areas where institutional uses, professional office uses and other uses compatible to uses of an office or institutional nature shall be encouraged to locate and to provide protection for this type land use from encroachment by other less desirable uses. The district's principal means of ingress and egress shall be along collector roads, minor arterials, and /or major arterials as designated on the County's Thoroughfare Classification Plan. The property owner plans to provide a personal services health and beauty salon and spa in the current structure and surrounding property. The salon and spa will offer luxurious treatments, a relaxing environment, friendly service, and unparalleled talent to provide clients with a salon and spa experience unlike any other. 4.Proposed Condition(s) Note: Within a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements which represent greater restrictions on the development and use of the property than the corresponding general use district regulations may be added. These conditions may assist in mitigating the impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding community. Please list any conditions proposed to be placed on the Conditional Zoning District below. Staff, the Planning Board, and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process. The applicant proposes to condition the rezoning to the attached site plan as approved by all New Hanover County regulatory boards and agencies. 6.Conditional Zoning District Considerations (1) How would the requested change be consistent with the County's policies for growth and development, as described in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, applicable small area plans, etc. The proposed rezoning of these properties follows the intent in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan to allow for an adaptive reuse of the current residential building into a personal services use which would serve the surrounding neighborhoods. This project would also promote environmentally and economically friendly growth by providing needed services close to residential areas without adding significant impervious surfaces. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 6 (2) How would the requested Conditional Zoning district be consistent with the property's classification on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map. The properties are located along Castle Hayne Road, shown as a Community Mixed Use Area on the New Hanover County Future Land Use Map. The Community Mixed Use Area place -type focuses on small - scale, compact, mixed use development patterns that serve multimodal travel and act as an attractor for county residents and visitors. The reuse of an existing structure for a personal services use provides a low intensity transition from the road to the residential neighborhoods. (3) What significant neighborhood changes have occurred to make the original zoning inappropriate, or how is the land involved unsuitable for the uses permitted under the existing zoning? The area surrounding Castle Hayne Road, a minor arterial road, has grown exponentially over the years. This low intensity personal services use will provide a buffer between the road and the surrounding residential uses without intruding into the neighborhoods and offering a conveniently located service. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 7 Conditional Zoning Application REPORT OF COMMUNITY MEETING Subject Property: 102 Forest Lane, Wilmington, NC 28401 Applicants: Lester and Suzanne Edwards Zoom Meeting: May 5, 2020 @ 5:30 p.m. Attendees: Amy C. Schaefer Lester Edwards Suzanne Edwards Ken Vafier Margaret Porter Ralph Colelli James Strickland Items Discussed: There was a discussion regarding the entrance and signage as well as any tree removal, the amount of traffic and the noise level. Respectfully submitted this 61 day of May, 2020. A Y C. E Attorney 10" plicants Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 8 3. - tE ERIFHED RECORDED A* • 4 RE B' Pa UC ER }- • }t - o 7 A ; i? Lac. �" i w C E 1z _ -� N -� 1 lJ —7 - �,�. ', a4 9,r 7 AO LOO S-iifc e pl,rell T4 1 -�' l I - tq 6K t - N 6 r .r a PQ Ir Age t P � I-' ' I;zk-: 3 L' - THIS ;'S 71 CITIFY _TVIAT TKE ROUNDAPtCS AS SHOWN 0-141 TRE- W �. zt "1 r �' f G I E Erg t* n R. INS O T PA.,. -_� �� �__��. �E,...,,IBF'f1 .� TNT � �_ R...'� . Ln � Q ��.�� 3�LS� �k �N``' Rr= rTnY. AND T!T Tip �� €��`�i "1 �:�_f�tVE't' . � M T!l i- r- r,.;:.a�.,�� �.� ► RIIR ; IN SAID DEEP. t - "T1 TTHAT .. t !► �E FROM r SU '° J i.ii?�:�,� #�� A-:7- ^� " "� _ - wr. PROPERTf BY V ?Ih�CTIVE 4 RKINGS tJ jj'" rj•' VARKW� . S BEING VISIBLE J i j [ ' ! U - T. 0T AT LEAST 19 IMr HES ABOVE ' �► v 4 :?+�l r ► r: 4;Y - THE I:' PLACfMW -. f €�F VISIBLE i��iA1) (cor�cRE � t ''f: IN THE BOUNDNRY Lf NFS SHRROUNDING THE PROPERT'f. Z b =� =" T1f=1Ur, IS GNU( PURSUANT TD C.S. 1 AS N:101'0. _-5 T, L, "Ott- yes G Uff �`� �!t 1 i � L" ✓ ` V rr r �r 7f `=r rte. i �im S ay% Lj 4A 1b - S °. - O <ZQ r , ? r IOTA Y PUB' LIC, DO HERE-BY' V �.�' (.5 T [ 19 C I Q .� = 0 T, TAI �f 11 H. BLAKE REGIMED LAND SURVEYOR, PERSONALLY MM- 4GORE ;E TINS DAY AND AC'KI��.OVOLEDOED THE EXECUTION 0.E THE COWN .-- C TfFfCATE y1 NESS MID 41 0TARDL SEAL THI owl �" �� ii�.l kai'twc eisae�,w �■ waa...�. �O % - _,4, z X,- AZ' r �N M AlKUL.1 J� &l �� J_ b - � :� . E �t, ' ERA CERTIFY �i ', ft `= H. SLAKE, REGISMLU ` F` i 3( y, WAS DRAWN BY ME FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY BY mE AND JS THE �..+ 7.T�1 M1 c U� / - • "tF .JJCR SUR' Ef, THAT THE BOOK #x`40 PACE NUMBERS Used ARE AS 7 S a � CIS ? A, , THAT THE ERROR 0 CLOSURE AS CALr,ULATE_ BY DPAfiTU;ES 15 THAT THIS MIA? IS rR�'�.RE ` _ 'j a; .�•= ANCE WITH C.S. 47 -30 AS AMENDED & 1S TRUE & CORRECT TO THE Y WO It SEAL THIS J' ,.� r'?E &BELIEF. JW • .' 1 � - , . -. 0110 A K O PIMISTMM Lfm SURMOR wl c r L Al C, Moo E- 217''9 �a o -- _ - t a� N. + Y Z 7 - _+ . � ,� � - a iii��� iii...///"___ ✓ f t � a � � � � � / �� • � � f i � � �`— " V $ •j r �•�. f J� f tr 1• l C tic, M 0102 16-1 4 a .I v 4k j NA rAP oF A 10J ? ; CAPE F_ E . � � , . F � -. f �4Z p -3 9 l 3 -f0 Aj X7- 3 Opp :` �' i,�' .� ' rte?`_;.... f f ._ – CA Rpt r7 a its ¢ 1 100 670 /00 Aa- dP �- , * rT Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 7 - 9 is A !Y• o-..a A ...4 _.r - i @i Notwithstanding New Hanover County approval of this plat, lots shown on said plat may not receive Health _Departr�ient approval for o- site sewage disposal system--s. ; for individual water supply systems. _ pp y � 46 r �4e' h-ereb certify f that T am 1 y -� y _ ewe are, the owners, of the property shown and desc gibed hereon and t iar T we) hereby adopt this plan of subdivision with my -( our own free consent and dedicate all streets, 'alleys walks, parks, conservation space and other areas tc public or private - -use as noted G_ All roads and drainage easements - - are- dedicated-for ublic :utility -Purposes a �„ f }�� ---. -- = P u� �.he , _ (we) certitY the land as s owri - :Here°n is located w i thin the subdiv.i s ? on jurisdiction -of New Hanove ' County Date J s - � Sig ature of owne (s) North . Carol? na New iianove., Cosy n ty 3 E Aft Filed fog- 'egi utration on the day of at /64 ! a ° m o /'_ o . } and duly recorded i n Nlap Book , at Page AWA STATE of NORTH CAROLIN A New Hanover County i€1e Foregoing/ Lf eitsii�Gta���i ^. Notary (Notaries) Public is /are certified to be correct. This the --7— day of 191/ Rebecca P. Tucker, Rgyister of Deeds By Deputy/ A. e __ WAS' Register of Deeds . t .. .. E D-1 v - � _ PROPOSED SITE PLAN Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 10- 8 - 1 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 04 �Z411 Ilk �`], N E W Z� HANOVER 4U COUNTY AIRPORT CO U� - - - - - - - - ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CHERRY DB. 3078 PG. 981 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: RSW- Residential Single Wide I I I NOTE: 1. NO GATES OR SPEED BUMPS ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR TRC APPROVAL. mmissioners - ITEM: 10- 9 - 1 Personal Service Beauty Salon 102 FOREST LANE WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- I EDWARDS I DB. 5799 PG. 2484 ZONING: R -15 I LAND USE CODE: Unused Land I CLASS: RES - Residential I ------------------------------------------- 5166 -1271 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- I I I I I I I I I I I LOT 4 -A MB 31 PG 252 15322 sf I 0.35 Ac. I BLE PROPERTIES LLC DB. 5721 PG. 2672 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential EDWARDS DB. 2641 PG. 608 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Unused Land CLASS: RES- Residential LOT 1 14837 sf 0.34 Ac. S 80 °21'04" E 84.63 E. C.M. C1 • CC i.:/�:.� 80 °41538" E MB 31 PG 252 PROPOSED DRIVE & PARKING I 15258 sf S 15.30' TOTAL LS REQUIRED (8 %) 0.35 Ac. L------------------- L - - - LLi 903 PROPOSED GR, 1657 MAIN DRIVE PARKING LOT EDWARDS 1733 REAR DRIVE 2 DB. 3658 PG. 739 CONCRETE PAD 159 ZO ._ 94 SHED LAND USE CODE: Unused Land COLELLI I w TOTAL EXISTING r TOTAL LOT AREA I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ECM L L - - - - - - - -- OVERHEAD LINE POWER Z poLE O I � I W I °° ASPHALT DRIVE m LOT 1 39251 sf I L 0.90 Ac. rn S 8 °22'4 ' E 119.38' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POWER POLE LOT 3 MB 31 PG 252 EDWARDS DB. 3658 PG. 739 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Auxially Structure CLASS: RES - Residential LOT 2 MB 31 PG 252 COLELLI DB. 2283 PG. 559 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential o� Q P� CONG. C� �I w `J m IgRIDGE M M Z o Z NI 5 POWER poLE � I O O M 5 w BLE PROPERTIES LLC M DB. 5721 PG. 2672 o ZONING: 0&1 z Z LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: COM- Commercial w Io 5 E.C.M. S 80 °30'48" E 182.08' E.C.M. �M13 POWER I 101E N 80 °2246" W 264.69' 2 - - - GUY OVERHEAD LINE I WALK FISH N 80 °22'46" W 37535' PnNC f GARAGE ASPHALT DRIVE L \P # -o - WALK - ANE .Pp1E 60' EASEMENT (D. 1477 I JASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT 3RICK r DRIVE POOL 3601 s LOT 1 2 MB 31 PG 252 110563SF Lp# LP 2.54 Acres DECK EDWARDS DB. 2641 PG. 608 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT = 22.6 FT. I SF 80 °41538" E 9795 PROPOSED DRIVE & PARKING I TOTAL DRIVES AND PARKING S 15.30' TOTAL LS REQUIRED (8 %) 1520 L------------------- L - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 903 r E C,M. 1657 MAIN DRIVE I I ECM 1733 REAR DRIVE 2 WA7_P1110PU CONCRETE PAD 159 PLAY HOUSE 94 SHED 247 COLELLI I w TOTAL EXISTING r TOTAL LOT AREA DB. 2283 PG. 559 I 16% I GARDEN 1967 ZONING: R -15 7241 TOTAL PROPOSED SE TOTAL EXISTING & PROPOSED LAND USE CODE: Unused Land TOTAL LOT AREA 110563 TOTAL % IMPERVIOUS 24% CLASS: RES - Residential Z L _ _ I HU GHS DB. 1625 PG. 731 ZONING: R -15 I I SWING -� \ LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential E M. I CLASS: RES - Residential S 80 °2246" E 120.23' I I MILES DB. 1294 PG. 1354 SHED ZONING: R -15 I LAND USE Family Residential I °49'05° E CLASS: RES Residential) N 09 26.69 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ECM'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O1702 DB. PG. 354 ZONING: R-15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential I I I I CLASS: RES - Residential NOTES: 1. SURVEYED IN MARCH -APRIL OF 2020. 2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL. 3. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD. 4. FOR REFERENCE SEE D.B. 2641 PAGE 608 AND MAP BOOK 31 PAGE 252. CHICKEN COOP 20' MINIMUM BUFFER S 80 °31'47" E 238.22' EDWARDS DB. 2701 PG. 965 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Unused Land CLASS: RES - Residential rn■ ■ ■ W Z F- z w w LL 'a 0 o W CJ ui w W J �1 V V NOTE: A N.C.D.O.T. DRIVEWAY PERMIT WILL BE APPLIED FOR, V INCLUDING CURRENT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS AND REQUIRED SIGHT TRIANGLES PROVIDING REQUIRED w SIGHT DIATANCES. ' `n w w 3 � Q M d m O I� w I� w I I p°WER I POLE PARKING LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT STRUCTURE SF EXISTING DRIVES 9795 PROPOSED DRIVE & PARKING 9208 TOTAL DRIVES AND PARKING 19003 TOTAL LS REQUIRED (8 %) 1520 PROPOSED NEW PARKING AREA 754 EAST PARKING AND DRIVE AREA 903 TOTAL PROVIDED 1657 INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS 0 40 80 120 1 " =40' REV. NO. REVISIONS DATE CopyrightQ Hanover Design Services, P.A., All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the contents of this document, or additions or deletions to this document, in whole or part, without written consent of the Land Surveyor or Engineer, is prohibited. Only copies from the original of this document. marked with the original signature and original seal of the Surveyor or Engineer, shall be considered to be valid and true copies. NEW HANOVER COUNTY 0&1 ZONING MINIMUM LOT SIZE - 15,000 SF FRONT YARD SETBACK - LOT WIDTH MINIMUM - 90' MAXIMUM HEIGHT - SIDE SETBACK = BUILDING HEIGHT X 2.75, NOT LESS THAN 25' REAR SETBACK = BUILDING HEIGHT X 3.73, NOT LESS THAN 30' Reference to Other Standards Article 2: Measurements and Definitions Section 5.8 Open Space Requirements Section 5.1 Parking and Loading Section 5.9 Fire Hydrants Section 5.2 Traffic, Access, and Connectivity Section 5.10 Airport Height Restriction Section 5.3 Tree Retention Article 6: Subdivision Design and Improvement Section 5.4 Landscaping and Buffering Article 7: Stormwater Management Section 5.5 Exterior Lighting Article 8: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Section 5.6 Signs Article 9: Flood Damage Prevention Section 5.7 Conservation Resources Article 11: Nonconforming Situation FIRM INFORMATION: 150 NEW HANOVER COUNTY CID: 370168, PROPERTY LOCATED ZONE "X" MAP # 3720312900K DATED: 8/28/2018 572 BUILDING, LANDSCAPING & PARKING: 102 FOREST LANE TOTAL AREA 2.54 AC. 110,563 SF BUILDING AREA: MAIN BUILDING 3,601 SF GARAGE 1,095 SF OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 12,649 SF TOTAL EXISTING 17,345 SF = 16% IMP. SURFACE AREA PROPOSED PARKING AREA & DRIVE WIDENING: PROPOSED 9,208 SF = 8% PROPOSED IMP. SURFACE AREA PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 24% - MAX 40% ALLOWED OPEN SPACE AREA: (1.93 Ac.) 84,010 SF OPEN SPACE MINIMUM 35% - PROPOSED 76 % MINIMUM PARKING SPACES PERMITTED: 3601/400 = 9 MINIMUM SPACES 24 SPACES PROPOSED (2 HANDICAPPED) IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS STRUCTURE SF MAIN BUILDING 3601 GARAGE 1095 BREEZEWAY 373 EAST DECK 150 POOL DECK 1224 SIDEWALKS 572 MAIN DRIVE 7446 REAR DRIVE 1 1733 REAR DRIVE 2 616 CONCRETE PAD 159 PLAY HOUSE 94 SHED 247 CHICKEN COOP 35 TOTAL EXISTING 17345 TOTAL LOT AREA 110563 TOTAL EXISTING% IMPERVIOUS 16% FOREST LANE WIDENING 1967 PROPOSED PARKING 7241 TOTAL PROPOSED 9208 TOTAL EXISTING & PROPOSED 26553 TOTAL LOT AREA 110563 TOTAL % IMPERVIOUS 24% LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT NOTES Buffers will be required between the new zoning district and the surrounding properties within residential districts (R -15). Existing vegetation can be credited if it meets the standards outlined below. a. The minimum width of these buffers is 20 feet consisting of: I. a planted buffer strip (minimum of 6' in height + 100% opacity), ii. a combination of plantings and fencing (fencing 6 -10' in height; if solid fence, two rows of plantings at 3' in height + 50% opacity; if permeable fence, two rows of plantings + 100% opacity within one year of planting), or iii. a combination of a berm and plantings (combined height of berm and plantings at a minimum of 6' in height and 100% opacity within one year of planting). Parking lot interior plantings requirements associated with the proposed parking lot. At least 8% of the total area used for parking, loading, driveways, internal drive aisles, and other vehicular or pedestrian uses shall be landscaped. a. Once the width of the existing drive aisles is determined, these standards can be applied and shown on a landscape plan. b. Landscaped strips are also required along any side of a parking lot adjacent to street rights -of -way, separate parking lots, and Residential districts. The standards are outlined in Table 5.4.6.0 of the UDO. However, the required buffers and landscaped strips can be incorporated into one in the same area if both of these requirements are met. STREET YARD AREA STANDARDS: 18 sf FOR EVERY LINEAR FOOT OF STREET YARD FRONTAGE 176LF X 18sf = 3,168sf OF STREET YARD REQUIRED - 4,060sf PROVIDED For every 600 square feet of street yard area, the following landscaping shall be provided: 1. One canopy /shade tree a minimum of three inches (3 ") caliper in size OR three (3) understory trees a minimum of six (6) feet in height at time of planting, if overhead power lines are located above the street yard; and 2. Six shrubs, 12" in height at time of planting. FOUNDATION PLANTINGS A. Foundation plantings located between the building face and the parking lot or drive aisle shall be required for all portions of buildings adjacent to parking lots or internal drive aisles. B. The following minimum standards are required, though additional landscaping is encouraged: 1. The foundation planting area shall be a minimum of 12 percent of the area of the building face adjacent to the parking area or internal drive; and 2. The foundation planting area shall be planted as landscaped areas of sufficient variety, height, and size, with plantings listed in "Tree and Plant Materials for Landscaping." PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORDATION OR CONVEYANCE r CONCEPT PLAN FOR LESTER AND SUZANNE EDWARDS LOCATED IN CAPE FEAR TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA OWNER: LESTER and SUZANNE EDWARDS 102 FOREST LANE WILMINGTON, N.C. 28401 HANOVER DESIGN SERVICES, P.A. LAND SURVEYORS, ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS 1123 FLORAL PARKWAY WILMINGTON, N.C. 28403 PHONE: (910) 343 -8002 LICENSE # C -0597 Date APRIL 2020 Scale: HORZ.: 7 "= 40' Drawn: GW Checked: GW Project No: 14939 Sheet No: 1 2 t. LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE 04 Q� NEW HANOVER 4/1 COUNTY AIRPORT CO J mmissioners - ITEM: 10- 9 - 2 r — — — — — ---------------------- ---- - - - - -- I EDWARDS I DB. 5799 PG. 2484 ZONING: R -15 I LAND USE CODE: Unused Land I CLASS: RES - Residential I i r— — — — — — — — — — — I I I L 102 FOREST LANE WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401 N / \ / 5166 -1271 / EDWARDS DB. 2641 PG. 608 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Unused Land CLASS: RES- Residential LOT 1 14837 sf 0.34 Ac. � — — — — — — — — — — �- — — — — — — — — — — — — — T — — — — -- — — -- — — 13 - 2a / ASPHALT DRIVE co IT LOT 1 T28 T29 0') 39251 sf / cn S 80 °21'04" E 84.63' 5 �� 5 5 PROPOSED GR PARKING LOT W, I T3 -7 "HOLLY I � "DOGWOOD I COVERS. T8 -7 "HOLLY 101E I I J 0"OAK I I � / I I 4 I 4"CS ESS / 2 5 "CYpRESs liq / LOT 4 -B sf LOT 1 / PG 252 I Cjl "PIN E / MB 31 PG 252 'j- LOT 4 -A I 6 "CIjF.RR� 15258 sf 8 MB 31 PG 252 I _ 0.35 Ac. w 15322 sf ' T ZONING: R -15 o 0.35 Ac. _ EDWARDS CLASS: RES - Residential BLE PROPERTIES"LLC I DS. 3658 PG. 739 0 DB. 572�FG. 2672 I I ZONING: R -15 a ZON14G: R -15 I 11 "MAG. LAND USE CODE: Unused Land Z L"D USE CODE: Single Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential -10 "MAG. CLASS: RES - Residential I OD ' 80 "22'46" W 264.69 ------ - - ' \ 15 ^ppGW- — "M "MAPLE MAG 6 24 „OAK I 2 7 MA G !,PL, MAPLE I 28 P iMAG 1("A 0UY WIRE flo ` I T43 -12 CL OVERHEAD LINO 9 "MAG• T45 -20 "PIN E LOCATED IN THIS AREA \ / Cp4PEr — — — — — — — — / — — — — — — — — — — 151HARDWOOD — — — — - E.CM — 1, it it ii f OVERHEAD LINE _ _ OWE R Z 6 "MAGI "MAG 20 "PINE 1 DOGWOOD �pA1 C) 13 - 2a / ASPHALT DRIVE co IT LOT 1 T28 T29 0') 39251 sf / cn S 80 °21'04" E 84.63' 5 �� 5 5 PROPOSED GR PARKING LOT W, ASPPIALT DRIVE AN EI 101E 60' EASEMENT (D. G. 14771 0.90 Ac. / T T31 0 8 "DOGWOOD ��9 "OAK uvr" I l — WALK "" L \P i1t 1 P. T30S 8 22'4 ' E 119.38 * ---------------- - - - - -- / - -- - -- -- - -- -�- - ��- - -I- -- - — — — ER 17 "OAK FISH N 80 °22'46" W 375.35' S PPO E E 29 "PI El Q�P T34 5 LOT 3 CONC. MB 31 PG 252 I LOT 2 w w MB 31 PG 252 I M tr T35 19 T36 EDWARDS I COLELLI / 17"HARDWOOD c7 o T37 5 - PG-739- _ _ I DB. 2283 PG. 559 / I 7R�N/ G : R -15 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Auxially Structure LAND USE CODE: Single Family esldential w m E I / CLASS: RES - Residential I BRIDG / CLASS: RES - Residential / / M � I 7 11L0W z H 18 „MAPLE 11.'HARDWOOD I I I I I 12 \ I "MAPLE T41 15 "MAG. I T44 E � 139 T40 T42 I t� S 80 "46'15.3D' 11MA T43 W' 145 L— — — -- — — -- — — — — — — -- — - -- — — - -I— — -- — — -- — — — EC - I WALK Ix X 4 „MAG. COLELLI I w / M41 E DB. 2283 ZONING RPG. 59 I GARDEN 5 pLOUS� 6 "OAK HUGHS DB. 1625 PG. 731 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential \ ,-CLASS_: RES - Residential �O 22 , LAND USE CODE: Unused Land I M H m L CLASS: RES - Residential I z z 22 "PINE 23„ GWOOD S 80 °2246" E 120.23' EC'M �3 "PINE ,I \ MILES / DB. 1294 PG. 1354 / ZONING: R -15 / LAND USE CODE: Stele- Family Residential \ CLASS RES - Residential I N 09 "4926; 9' I I � I I I STONE I DB. 1702 PG. 354 I ZONING: R-15 LAND USE CODE: Sill Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential 1 I i lI E.G.M T3 -7 "HOLLY POWER T5 -22 "DOGWOOD Il WOPA COVERS. T8 -7 "HOLLY 101E AREA j WAL T11-8'71 0"OAK / / "CYPRE� T13 -9 / T 14 -6 I 4 I 4"CS ESS / 2 5 "CYpRESs liq POOL sf LOT 1 / PG 252 I Cjl "PIN E ^MA 1 \P 0. "DOGWOO o —22 2 947{cM 16 "MApLEI 28 "PIN 8 W 0 m BEE PROPERTIES LLC DB. 5721 PG. 2672 1 \ I EDWARDS DB 2641 PG. 608 EO `""�+I OD� 31 °PIE rn "D OGYtD I "MAG. ZONING: R -15 o ZONING: 0&1 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential 10 "M pLe I I z CLASS: RES - Residential T28 -8 Z g "MAG• 18 HARDWOOD CLASS: COM- Commercial — I I u w II I I T31 5 T32 -12 "MAG. / � S 80 "30'48" E 182.08' E.C'IM I 12'118" O 10"oAK HARDWOO G. 6 "MA it TV / -10 "MAG. WM pOVJE '26 T24 T21 pot N --.... OD ' 80 "22'46" W 264.69 ------ - - ' \ 15 ^ppGW- — "M "MAPLE MAG 6 24 „OAK T25 3 T22 2 7 MA G !,PL, MAPLE I 28 P iMAG 1("A 0UY WIRE flo ` I T43 -12 CL OVERHEAD LINO "MAPLE T45 -20 "PIN E LOCATED IN THIS AREA \ / Cp4PEr T � T11 T15T1�T13 — ASPPIALT DRIVE AN EI 101E 60' EASEMENT (D. G. 14771 0.90 Ac. / T T31 0 8 "DOGWOOD ��9 "OAK uvr" I l — WALK "" L \P i1t 1 P. T30S 8 22'4 ' E 119.38 * ---------------- - - - - -- / - -- - -- -- - -- -�- - ��- - -I- -- - — — — ER 17 "OAK FISH N 80 °22'46" W 375.35' S PPO E E 29 "PI El Q�P T34 5 LOT 3 CONC. MB 31 PG 252 I LOT 2 w w MB 31 PG 252 I M tr T35 19 T36 EDWARDS I COLELLI / 17"HARDWOOD c7 o T37 5 - PG-739- _ _ I DB. 2283 PG. 559 / I 7R�N/ G : R -15 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Auxially Structure LAND USE CODE: Single Family esldential w m E I / CLASS: RES - Residential I BRIDG / CLASS: RES - Residential / / M � I 7 11L0W z H 18 „MAPLE 11.'HARDWOOD I I I I I 12 \ I "MAPLE T41 15 "MAG. I T44 E � 139 T40 T42 I t� S 80 "46'15.3D' 11MA T43 W' 145 L— — — -- — — -- — — — — — — -- — - -- — — - -I— — -- — — -- — — — EC - I WALK Ix X 4 „MAG. COLELLI I w / M41 E DB. 2283 ZONING RPG. 59 I GARDEN 5 pLOUS� 6 "OAK HUGHS DB. 1625 PG. 731 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential \ ,-CLASS_: RES - Residential �O 22 , LAND USE CODE: Unused Land I M H m L CLASS: RES - Residential I z z 22 "PINE 23„ GWOOD S 80 °2246" E 120.23' EC'M �3 "PINE ,I \ MILES / DB. 1294 PG. 1354 / ZONING: R -15 / LAND USE CODE: Stele- Family Residential \ CLASS RES - Residential I N 09 "4926; 9' I I � I I I STONE I DB. 1702 PG. 354 I ZONING: R-15 LAND USE CODE: Sill Family Residential CLASS: RES - Residential 1 I i lI I I- z w w a w O w O rn. _ / ■ ■ cc W Z w W a O 2 C w W (f) Q U I i 1<�� 0 40 80 120 1 " = 40' REV. NO. REVISIONS DATE CopyrightQ Hanover Design Services, P.A., All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the contents of this document, or additions or deletions to this document, in whole or part, without written consent of the Land Surveyor or Engineer, is prohibited. Only copies from the original of this document. marked with the original signature and original seal of the Surveyor or Engineer, shall be considered to be valid and true copies. TREE TABLE T1 -8 "HOLLY 5 "CYPR T3 -7 "HOLLY T4 -5 "HOLLY T5 -22 "DOGWOOD Il WOPA COVERS. T8 -7 "HOLLY T9 -6 "HOLLY AREA j WAL T11-8'71 0"OAK / / "CYPRE� T13 -9 / 5 ASPHALT DRIVE 6 "WIl {LOW I "CYPRESS T 14 -6 ONE STORY 4 I 4"CS ESS BRICK HOUSE 3601 / 2 5 "CYpRESs liq POOL sf LOT 1 / PG 252 I Cjl "PIN E 20 "HARDW�BR1 AG 1\P 1 \P 0. "DOGWOO o T20 -7 2 947{cM 16 "MApLEI 28 "PIN -5 "MAG. T22 3 DECK \ I EDWARDS DB 2641 PG. 608 EO `""�+I OD� 31 °PIE rn "D OGYtD I "MAG. ZONING: R -15 21 I y T26 -4 LAND USE CODE: Single Family Residential 10 "M pLe I I T27 -23 CLASS: RES - Residential T28 -8 "MAPLE T'01" I I ,,,HARDWOOD q E HARDW OOD I I T31 -1 0"HARDWOOD T32 -12 "MAG. 0 3 "OAK 12 "PLE M A �x 12'118" O 10"oAK HARDWOO G. 6 "MA 33 -OAK I -10 "MAG. T36 -15 "OAK 18 "HARDWOOD "M "MAPLE MAG 6 24 „OAK I 9 "112" -4 "MAG. 7 MA G !,PL, MAPLE I r iMAG 1("A T41 -12 flo ` I T43 -12 "MAPLE POWER "MAPLE T45 -20 "PIN E LOCATED IN THIS AREA \ / Cp4PEr TREES NOT SHED 20' MINIMUM � INIMUM BUFFE II S 80 °31'47” E 238.22' 1E. C.M I \ EDWARDS �� l DB. 2701 PG. 965 ZONING: R -15 LAND USE CODE: Unu9�d Land CLASS: RES - Residential \ \ I I- z w w a w O w O rn. _ / ■ ■ cc W Z w W a O 2 C w W (f) Q U I i 1<�� 0 40 80 120 1 " = 40' REV. NO. REVISIONS DATE CopyrightQ Hanover Design Services, P.A., All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the contents of this document, or additions or deletions to this document, in whole or part, without written consent of the Land Surveyor or Engineer, is prohibited. Only copies from the original of this document. marked with the original signature and original seal of the Surveyor or Engineer, shall be considered to be valid and true copies. TREE TABLE T1 -8 "HOLLY T2 -5 "HOLLY T3 -7 "HOLLY T4 -5 "HOLLY T5 -22 "DOGWOOD T6 -8 "HOLLY T7 -6 "HOLLY T8 -7 "HOLLY T9 -6 "HOLLY T10 -28 "PINE T11-8'71 0"OAK T12- 11 "M2" HARDWOOD T13 -9 "HARDWOOD T 14 -6 "MAG . T1 5-9"OAK T16 -10 "MAG. T17 -8 MAG. T 18 -24 "PIN E T 19 -20 "PIN E T20 -7 "MAG. T21 -5 "MAG. T22 -6 "MAG . T23 -5 "MAG. T24 -9 "MAG. T25 -7 "MAG. T26 -4 "MAG. T27 -23 11MAG. T28 -8 "MAPLE T29 -7 "MAG. T30 -7 "MAG. T31 -1 0"HARDWOOD T32 -12 "MAG. T33 -21 "HARDWOOD T34 -9 "MAG. T35 -10 "MAG. T36 -15 "OAK T37 -11 "MAG. T38 -4 "MAG. T39 -14 ' MAPLE T40 -17 "MAPLE T41 -12 "MAPLE T42 -11 "MAPLE T43 -12 "MAPLE T44 -13 "MAPLE T45 -20 "PIN E PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORDATION OR CONVEYANCE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TREE SURVEY LESTER AND SUZANNE EDWARDS LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF SHALLOTTE NEW HANOVER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA LESTER EDWARDS 1905 CASTLE HAYNE ROAD WILMINGTON, N.C. HANOVER DESIGN SERVICES, P.A. LAND SURVEYORS, ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS 1123 FLORAL PARKWAY WILMINGTON, N.C. 28403 PHONE: (910) 343 -8002 LICENSE # C -0597 Date' APRIL 2020 Scale. HORZ.: 7 "= 40' Drawn: GW Checked: GW Project No: 14939 Sheet No: 2 2 Of NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Appointment of Voting Delegate to the 2020 North Carolina Association of County Commissioners ( NCACC) Annual Conference BRIEF SUMMARY: The NCACC 113th Annual Conference will be held virtually on August 5 -6 and 14 -15, 2020 with the annual business session to be held on August 6th, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. Commissioner Barfield and Commissioner Zapple are registered to participate. A voting delegate must be appointed and submitted to NCACC by August 3, 2020. During the business session, each county will be entitled to one vote on items that come before the membership, including election of the NCACC Second Vice President. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Appoint Commissioner Barfield or Commissioner Zapple as the voting delegate. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Make appointment. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Commissioner Barfield was appointed 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 11 a °a11A CAR,), y �C d��t CCJ UN"1'1 c° ` Designation of Voting Delegate to NCACC Annual Conference h hereby certify that I am the duly designated voting delegate for County at the 113th Annual Conference of the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners to be held during the virtual* Annual Business Session on August 6, 2020, at 11 a.m. Voting Delegate Name: Title: In the event the designated voting delegate is unable to attend, has been selected as County's alternate voting delegate. Alternate Voting Delegate Name: Title: Article VI, Section 2 of our Constitution provides: "On all questions, including the election of officers, each county represented shall be entitled to one vote, which shall be the majority expression of the delegates of that county. The vote of any county in good standing may be cast by any one of its county commissioners who is present at the time the vote is taken; provided, if no commissioner be present, such vote may be cast by another county official, elected or appointed, who holds elective office or an appointed position in the county whose vote is being cast and who is formally designated by the board of county commissioners. These provisions shall likewise govern district meetings of the Association. A county in good standing is defined as one which has paid the current year's dues." Please return this form to Alisa Cobb via email by Monday, August 3, 2020 close of business: Email: alisa.cobb(&ncacc.org *Please note — due to the COVID -19 pandemic, the 113' NCACC Annual Conference will be held virtually with voting taking place via an electronic platform. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 11-1 -1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Appointment of Voting Delegate to the NACo 2020 Annual Conference BRIEF SUMMARY: The National Association of Counties' (NACo) 85th Annual Conference business meeting will be held virtually on July 20, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. A designated voting delegate must be appointed and submitted to NACo by July 17, 2020. Per NACo, any elected or appointed official or staff member from a county /parish /borough may be a voting delegate. NACo's annual election of officers and policy adoption will take place during the annual business meeting. Commissioner Jonathan Barfield, Jr. and Commissioner Rob Zapple are registered to participate. RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Appoint Commissioner Barfield or Commissioner Zapple as the voting delegate. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Make appointment. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: Commissioner Barfield was appointed 5 -0. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 12 Voting Credentials Forms Page 1 of 1 c a"°"NAG)� NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES � -�� 2020 VOTING CREDENTIALS Designated County Delegate If the name of the delegate does not appear on the drop -down list, please enter it here. New Hanover County, NC Full Name Email 9 Your state association is authorized to receive or cast any unclaimed ballots for counties that have registered delegates, unless your county has expressly prohibited the state association from doing so on this form. Check this box if you DO NOT authorize your state association to receive your county's ballot, if unclaimed by a delegate from your county. If you are unavailable to attend the virtual Annual Business Meeting but still want to cast a vote in the election, please send an email to credentials @naco.org. I, the designated voting delegate ,or chief elected official in my county, hereby submit my electronic signature. Full Name Email 2020 -06 -17 Submit Click here for more information about NACo voting credentials Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 12 -1 -1 https: // portal .naco.org /vcNC.cfm ?key =0766A 6/17/2020 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE:? /13/2020 Regular DEPARTMENT: Governing Body PRESENTER(S): Chair Olson - Boseman CONTACT(S): Kym Crowell, Clerk to the Board SUBJECT: Committee Appointments BRIEF SUMMARY: Vacancies exist on the following boards and committees: • New Hanover County Health and Human Services Board • New Hanover County Planning Board RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: Make appointments. COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) Make appointments. COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: The following appointments were made. New Hanover County Health and Human Services Board: Dr. Linda Francis was appointed in the Psychiatrist category. New Hanover County Planning Board: H. Allen Pope was reappointed. Donna Girardot was appointed. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT NHC Health and Human Services Board Vacancy: Category: Psychiatrist Term: Unexpired, expiring 7/31/23 Applicant Eligible For Reappointment Category Nominations Dr. Linda Francis Psychiatrist Attachments: Committee Information Sheet Application Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BOARD Number of Members: 15, appointed in categories as follows: 1 Licensed Physician 1 Licensed Pharmacist 1 Licensed Dentist 1 Licensed Optometrist 1 Licensed /Registered Nurse 1 Licensed Veterinarian 1 Professional Engineer 4 At- Large /Consumers of Human Services 1 County Commissioner 1 Licensed Psychologist 1 Licensed Social Worker 1 Licensed Psychiatrist Terms: Staggered initially; 4 years thereafter; no member shall serve more than two (2) full consecutive terns. A county commissioner's term shall be consistent with the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners appointing practices and shall serve only as long as the member is a county commissioner per NCGS 153A- 77(c). Compensation: TBD for Chairman $ , other members $ per meeting Regular Meetings: Meetings are held on the third Tuesday of every month at 8:00 a.m. Statute or cause creating Board: NCGS 153A -77; BOCC resolution adopted March 18, 2019 Brief on the functions: The consolidated human services board appointed by the board of county commissioners shall serve as the policy- making, rule- making, and administrative board of the consolidated human services agency. Please refer to NCGS 153A -77(d) for further detail. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 2 rim to TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS CATEGORY APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Dr. Virginia W. Adams, Vice -Chair 331 Hidden Valley Road At- Large /Human Srvs. First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28409 Consum. 910 - 367 -9920 (C) Vacancy Psychiatrist Unexpired 7/31/23 Michelle Gunn 4105 Breezewood Drive, Unit 104 At- Large /Human Srvs. First 6/17/19 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28412 Consum. 910 - 431 -8962 (C) Jody Long 116 Elliott Dr. Wilmington, NC 28405 Psychologist First 6/17/19 7/31/21 336 - 964 -5638 (C) 910 - 623 -0605 (W) Amy McLane 2309 Princess Place Dr. Professional Engineer First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28405 910 - 520 -0019 (C) 763 -5350 (W) Linda "Candy" Robbins 4611 Split Rail Drive Social Worker First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28412 910 - 392 -2200 (H) Frankie Roberts 121 Hargrove Drive At- Large /Human Srvs. First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28411 Consum. 910 - 762 -4635 (W) 910 - 262 -1600 (C) Dr. Robert J. Schiffel 6422 Shinnwood Road Dentist First 6/17/19 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28409 910 - 392 -5176 (H) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 2 rim to NEW HANOVER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED HUMAN SERVICES (CONT.) Dr. Stephanie D. Smith, Chair 5225 Clear Run Drive Nurse First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28403 910 - 279 -9830 (C) 910 - 962 -4222 (W) Dr. Melody Speck Evans 3101 Wescot Court Veterinarian First 6/17/19 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28409 910 - 798 -1436 (H) 910 - 799 -5587 (W) Dr. Kim Thrasher Home 6423 Shinnwood Road Wilmington, NC 28409 Pharmacist First 6/17/19 7/31/23 910 - 452- 2901(H) 910 - 619- 3755(C) 910 - 332- 9540(W) Dr. LeShonda Wallace 4412 Woodcroft Drive At- Large /Human Srvs. First 6/17/19 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28405 Consum. 973 - 342 -0979(C) 910 - 662- 9348(W) Edward Weaver, Jr. 1535 Magnolia Place Optometrist First 6/17/19 7/31/23 Wilmington, NC 28403 910 - 612- 9220(C) 910 - 791- 6086(W) Dr. David W. Zub 6811 Finian Dr. Physician Unexpired 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28409 910 - 799 -2627 (H) 336 - 561 -9112 (C) Patricia Kusek, County Commissioner 230 Government Center Drive, Ste. 175 County Commissioner 5/4/20 Undesignated Wilmington, NC 28403 910 - 798 -7259 (NHC Office) Contact: Kathy Stoute Assistant County Manager 910 - 798 -7199 Revised: 05/2020 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 3 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Linda Francis < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2020 1:01 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Health and Human Services Board Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Health and Human Services Board Category Psychiatrist/MD Name Linda Francis Email lindafrancismd(a)gmail.com Home Address 426 Jeb Stuart Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Map It Home Phone (910) 473 -1956 Years living in New Hanover County 20 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Female Race White Age 63 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer SELF Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 1 - 4 Occupation Psychiatrist Professional Activities Private Practice of Adult, Addiction and Forensic Psychiatry (now part time) Volunteer Activities None Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? I have more time and would like to be of service to the community at large What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? Accessibiity of mental health services, both outpatient and inpatient (bed shortages) Liason and cooperation with first responders /law enforcement to improve response to crises that play out in the community Any other items of importance to members of the community and committee Qualifications for serving: 29 years experience as a psychiatrist in almost all treatment settings including inpatient, outpatient, mental health center, nursing homes, jails and prisons Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: None List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 7 Frank Snyder MD Reference 1 Phone (910) 762 -4600 Reference 2 Therese Hueholt MD Reference 2 Phone (910) 515 -4768 Reference 3 Patrick Martin MD Reference 3 Phone (910) 352 -8514 Additional comments: Thank you for the invitation to apply and opportunity to be of service. Date 06/09/2020 Consent VI understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13 -1 -5 BOC OFF COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS NHC Planning Board Vacancies: 2 Terms: 3 years expiring 7/31/23 Applicants Eligible For Reappointment Nominations Bandorian Cromartie Kaitlin Franklin Donna Girardot (willing to serve another term if the Board desires H. Allen Pope X Vivian Radecsky Michael Sanclimenti Nicholas Silivanch Steven Weitzner John L. Weaver Attachments: Committee Information Sheet Applications Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 1 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Number of Members: 7 Term of Office: Three years Compensation: $20.00 per meeting Regular Meetings: First Thursday of every month at 6:00 p.m. in the Assembly Room of the New Hanover County Courthouse, 24 North Third Street, Wilmington, NC. Statute or cause creating Board: N. C. General Statutes 153A -321. New Hanover County Ordinance and Resolution establishing Planning Board dated September 2, 1980, for the purpose of planning and making recommendations in order that the elected and appointed officials of the County may competently perform their duties. Brief on the functions: Make studies of the County and surrounding areas; determine objectives to be sought in the development of the study area; prepare and adopt plans for achieving these objectives; develop and recommend policies, ordinances, administrative procedures, and other means for carrying out plans in a coordinated and efficient manner; advise the Board of Commissioners concerning the use and amendment of means of carrying out plans; exercise any functions in the administration and enforcement of various means for carrying out plans that the Board of Commissioners may direct; perform any other related duties that the Board of Commissioners may direct. Much of the Board's time is consumed with Land Use Planning, Zoning, and Growth Management Issues. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 2 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION Paul D. Boney, Vice -Chair First 7/11/16 7/31/19 322 Causeway Drive Second 8/12/19 7/31122 Seapath Unit 307 Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 (910) 520 -0812 (C) Donna Girardot, Chair First 4/21/14 7/31/17 927 Radnor Road Second 7/17/17 7/31/20 Wilmington, NC 28409 (910) 452 -1078 (H) Ernest W. Olds First 7/20/15 7/31/18 317 Folly Island Court Second 7/9/18 7/31/21 Wilmington, NC 28411 (910) 303 -9666 (H /C) (910) 341 -7600 (W) Jeffrey B. Petroff First 7/9/18 7/31/21 5608 Oak Bluff Lane Wilmington, NC 28409 910 - 540 -1346 (C) 910 - 796 -9922 (H) 910 -254 -9333 (W) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 2 NEW HANOVER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD (CONT.) Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 3 0 TERM OF OFFICE CURRENT MEMBERS APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION H. Allen Pope, PE Unexpired 7/11/16 7/31/17 212 Grayhawk Circle First 7/17/17 7/31/20 Wilmington, NC 28411 (910) 471 -7177 (C)�c 1 Thomas "Jordy" Rawl Unexpired 7/21/14 7/31/15 1722 Canady Road First 7/20/15 7/31/18 Wilmington, NC 28411 Second 7/9/18 7/31/21 910 - 332 -8528 (H) 252 - 916 -4575 (C) Colin J. Tarrant First 8/12/19 7/31/22 1419 Halcyon Ln. Wilmington, NC 28411 919 -414 -2684 (C) Director: Wayne Clark File: /Planning Planning Manager: Ken Vafier Revised: 10/2019 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 910- 798 -7165 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 3 0 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Bandorian Cromartie < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 10:33 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Bandorian Cromartie Email bandodanic @gmail.com Home Address 617 McGinnis Lane Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Map It Home Phone (910) 512 -2846 Cell Phone (910) 512 -2846 Years living in New Hanover County 21 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Male Race Black Age 28 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer Boys And Girls Brigade Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 4 Occupation Professional Youth Developer Professional Activities Serving in an active role of significance or leadership position in a business, non - profit or community -based organization, e.g., board of directors Leadership in discipline - related public outreach activities Participation in other activities that place faculty in direct contact with business and other organizational leaders (e.g. speaking engagements) Develop an approved minor, certificate or executive education program or course Develop approved material describing the design and implementation of new curricula Volunteer Activities I spend my free time getting children and adults the resources they need to succeed in life such as,jobs, mental and behavioral help,cars,money,food,education. I serve the New Hanover County Resilience Task Force,Champions for Compassion, NAACP, Policy And Planning for US Army, and Freeman Family Foundation. Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? I wish to serve on this board because, I can bring something completely different to the table such a military and law enforcement background. I was born here and i know how much this area has changed over the years. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? Housing for move people in the future to come. Qualifications for serving: Listening. The skill of listening to what others have to say Having Knowledge or Understanding of Community Issues or Ordinances. Planning commissioners spoke to the importance of having knowledge or understanding of issues facing the community, or of local ordinances and laws. Being Fair & Open- Minded. Being Prepared. Ability to Communicate. Public speaking and the ability to communicate. Analytic Ability Relevant Experience. Having relevant experience in planing 8 military bases in America and Korea. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: None List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 Gabbie Homles Reference 1 Phone (919) 935 -2341 Reference 2 Darnell Freeman Reference 2 Phone (910) 777 -8861 Reference 3 Charlene Ceaser Board of Commissioders - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 5 Reference 3 Phone (910) 612 -4791 Date 06/10/2020 Consent le I understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. 80C OFF Board of Commissiorers - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 6 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Kaitlin Franklin < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:10 AM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Kaitlin Franklin Email kaitlin.e.franklin(agmail.com Home Address 718 Queen St. Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Map It Home Phone (910) 523 -9963 Years living in New Hanover County 6 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Female Race White Age 29 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer University of Maryland Global Campus Occupation Academic Advisor Board of Commissiobers - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 7 Professional Activities Elected to Tidal Creek Board of Directors 2017 Previously worked as a Poll Worker for NHC Board of Elections Volunteer Activities Wilmington SURJ Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? I sincerely believe in Wilmington and want to be involved in helping make the decisions to move Wilmington into the future. I believe that there is a lot of room for improvement in how we are planning our city. Additionally, I am actively leaming more about local government and increasing my government involvement. I look forward to working with a group of other people who are active in their community and working closely to solve important problems. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? I would like to see the Planning Board address the ever present issue of growth in Wilmington- Managing this growth and making the most of this growth. This growth paired with our delicate location on the coast makes planning in NHC very important. I would like to see NHC plan for a future that is built for its citizens today and in 50 years. Qualifications for serving: I have experience serving on the Board of Directors at Tidal Creek and highly value the organization and process that is necessary to move things forward. I look forward to serving my community by providing my communication skills from my work experience and applying critical thinking skills to work through complex issues. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: None List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 Ashley Daniels Reference 1 Phone (910) 622 -2629 Reference 2 Kelsey Gibbs Reference 2 Phone (919) 360 -9032 Reference 3 Sarah Daniels Reference 3 Phone (910) 386 -1702 Date 06/29/2020 Consent VI understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. PIFICEILVED Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 B O C 0 F F " ITEM: 13- 2 - 8 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Donna Girardot < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 2:59 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Attachments: 2020- Request- for - Reappointment.pdf Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Donna Girardot Email digirardot(aDgmail.com Home Address 927 RadnorRd Wilmington, North Carolina 28409 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) 927 radnor rd Wilmington, NC 28409 United States Map It Home Phone (910) 452 -1078 Years living in New Hanover County 23 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Female Race White Age 70+ Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer Retired Board of Commissiorbars - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 9 Occupation Former WCFHBA Executive Officer and CEO BASE (currently retired) Professional Activities 2019 GWBJ 100 Influencers, 3x Planning Board Chairman, 2x Airport Authority Chairman, Wilmington Chamber of Commerce Board, long- standing and former member of Wilmington Rotary Club— former Board member, 2010 Chairman CF Area United Way, inducted WCFHBA Hall of Fame, serve on UNCW MPA Advisory Board, Founding Member of Stewardship Development Award, 2x Chair of NHC TRC, taught various classes at UNCW, 4x Mentor GWBJ Mentoring Program for Women, 2008 CF Woman of Achievement nominee, 2007 Elderhaus Excellence in Profession Award, GWBJ 1 of 10 "Women in High Places ", NC DEQ Secretary's Roundtable, former Board member of NC Coastal Resources Law, Planning & Policy Center- UNC -CH Law, CRC's Ocean Policy Steering Committee, NC Estuarine Shoreline Steering Committee Volunteer Activities ILM Airport Authority, Camillus Minister - Bascillica Shrine of St. Mary's, Wilmington Rotary Club, 4x WILMA Mentor Program for Women, Chairman of NHC TRC, NHC Planning Board Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? I was the NHC Planning Board representative to Comprehensive Plan process, Chairman of the SUP process, Currently Planning Board representative to LIDO process —first two documents adopted unanimously by NHC Commissioners. I am also grateful to have the confidence of the Planning Board to be elected to chair that body three times. I have also served twice as Chairman of the TRC. I respectfully ask that I be reqppointedd so I can see the UDO process through to completion and adopted by the Commissioners. Due to my previous work on all of these past projects, I feel that I am in a unique position and have the experience, skills and historical perspective to continue to direct and guide the remaining issues still to be addressed in this process. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? I am anxious to continue to play a part in furthering the economic enhancement, job creation and quality of life in NHC. Qualifications for serving: See above. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: Airport Authority List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 Michael Lee Reference 1 Phone (910) 399 -3477 Reference 2 Tom Wolfe Reference 2 Phone (910) 392 -0654 Reference 3 Brian Eckel Reference 3 Phone (910) 344 -1000 Upload additional information. Board of CommissionZrs - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 10 • 2020 - Request- for- Reappointment.pdf Date 06/01/2020 Consent t4o'I understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. Board of CommissioArs - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 11 June 1, 2020 Julia Olson - Boseman, Chairman Members of the New Hanover County Commissioners 230 Government Center Dr., Ste. 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 RE: Request for Reappointment to the NHC Planning Board Dear Commissioners: Please find attached my application for reappointment to the NHC Planning Board. During the past approximately six years, I have been privileged to serve as the Planning Board representative to the Comprehensive Plan update; I chaired the Special Use Permit update (both the Comp Plan and the SUP were endorsed by all segments of the community and unanimously adopted by the commissioners); and represent the Planning Board reviewing the update to the county's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). I view each of these documents as a natural progression towards unifying and modernizing the county's planning tools which will enable us to better serve the community and the development industry. I'm confident that these documents, with the completion of the UDO will promote economic development, spur job creation and enhance the quality of life in the county. I respectfully request reappointment to the Planning Board so I can see the UDO process through to completion and adopted by the commissioners. Due to my previous work on each of these past projects plus serving three terms as Planning Board Chairman, I feel that I am in a unique position and have the experience, skills and historical perspective to continue to direct and guide the remaining issues still to be addressed in this process. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or need further information. Many thanks for your consideration of my request. Sincerely, Donna Girardot 927 Radnor Rd. Wilmington, NC 28409 Attachment Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 12 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 COMMITTEE APPLICATION Telephone (910) 798 -7149 FAX (910) 798 -7145 Board /Committee: New Hanover County Planning Board n Name: H. Allen Pope, PE E- Mail:apope.28405 @gmail.com Home Address:21 2 Mailing Address if different: .t Wig" (City) '2ALI o Home Phone: Fax: Cell: 910- 471 -7177 (Zip Code) Business: Years living in New Hanover County: 28 Male: ✓ Female: Race:White Age: 55 (Information for the purpose of assuring a cross - section of the community) Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? If yes, name Employer. S &ME Inc. A person currently employed by the agency or department for which this application is made, must resign his /her position with New Hanover County upon appointment, in accordance with Article Vl, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy. Furthermore, applicant should have no immediate family member employed by such agency or department. Occupation :North Carolina Construction Engineering and Inspection Manager Professional Activities: CMAA, ASCE, NSPE, PENC Volunteer Activities: Elder (Cape Fear Christian Church) Why do you wish to serve on this board /committee? It will be an extension of my 30+ year career with NCDOT. I enjoy working with developments and quality of life for our county. Conflict of Interest: If a board member believes he /she has a conflict or potential conflict of interest on a particular issue, that member should state this belief to the other members of his/her respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict, detailing that he /she has a separate, private, or monetary interest, either director indirect, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse himself /herself from voting on the matter. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? Qualifications for serving: 30+ years with NCDOT (of which 12 years as Division Engineer) . Planning and construction of all major routes in the Wilmington MPO. Other municipal or county boards/committees on which you are serving: Wilmington MPO and Cape Fear RPO TRC. List three local personal references and phone numbers: 1. Jonathan Barfield, Jr. 910 - 233 -8780 2. Danny McComas 910 - 343 -8372 3 Lanny Wilson 910 - 2566439 to to'4 —"j(p June 29, 2016 � � Aignature Date: - Applications are kept on file for 18kmonths I understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed Board of Comn1ff# 8H�RUsJb�yf" &6y of County Commissioners. Please use reverse side for additional comments ITEM: 13- 2 - 13 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 230 Government Center Drive, Suite 175 Wilmington, NC 28403 COMMITTEE APPLICATION Telephone (910) 798 -7149 _ FAX (910) 798 -7145 Board /Committee: Planning Board Name: Vivian Radecsky E_Mail:vradecsky@gmail.com Home Address: 6001 Appomattox Dr. Wilmington 28409 (Street) (Zip Code) Mailing Address if different: (City) (Zip Code) Home Phone: 910- 399 -8388 Fax: Ce/ /:910- 899 -2134 Business: Years living in New Hanover County. 4 - -9 Male: Female: ✓ Race: Caucasian Age: 67 (Information for the purpose of assuring a cross - section of the community) Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? If yes, name No Employer. N/A A person currently employed by the agency or deparhment for which this application is made, must resign his/her position with New Hanover County upon appointment, in accordance with Article Vl, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy. Furthermore, applicant should have no immediate family member employed by such agency or department. Occupation: Retired lab technician; retired substitute teacher Professional Activities: Volunteer Activities: Girl & boy scouts, Homeroom Mother, assist Red Cross, election fliers Why do you wish to serve on this boarWcommittee? to represent the people of our community Conflict of Interest. If a board member believes helshe has a conflict or potential conflict of interest on a particdar issue, that member should state this belief to the other members of his/her respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict, detailing that he/she has a separate, private, or monetary interest, either direct or indirect, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse himseldherself from voting on the matter. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? building development Qualifications for serving: listening and gathering community opinions and concerns; sincere interest in keeping our community safe and working cooperatively Other municipal or county boardslcommittees on which you are serving: none List three local personal references and phone numbers: ECEIVE]D 2. 3. Joan Zelinski 630 - 606 -9796 Jul 16, 2019 �( "` �" q� Date: 1' � [�� _ ` Signature Applications are kept on file for 18 months I understand that any board or committee appoi ay be removed without cause by a majority of County Commis n . Please use reverse side for additional comments Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 14 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Michael Sanclimenti < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:24 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Attachments: Mikeres13.pdf Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Michael Sanclimenti Email michaelsanclimentiCcDatt.net Home Address 538 Deveraux Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Map It Home Phone (732) 616 -4982 Cell Phone (732) 616 -4982 Years living in New Hanover County 1.5 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Male Race White Age 63 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer Board of Commissiorlers - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 15 AT &T Occupation Senior Consultant Professional Activities Accomplished technology professional with extensive experience in information technology, network architecture, design, development, and security for Fortune 500 corporations Volunteer Activities Before moving to Wilmington, I served on the Howell Township (NJ) Zoning Board of Adjustment as an alternate from 2005 - 2007. From 2012 to 2019, served on the Howell Township Zoning Board of Adjustment as a full time member. Served as Secretary for three years and three years as Vice Chair. Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? This board serves both the businesses and residents of the county so neither infringe on how businesses operate and residents reside on their property. The Planning Board must strike a balance of business growth and and the welfare of the residents. As a former member of the Howell Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, my decision on each case was based on what was good for the township and the residents. I enjoyed my time on the Zoning Board and with my experience I believe I can fulfill the responsibility as a member of the New Hanover County Planning Board. Qualifications for serving: Two years serving as an alternate on the Howell Township Zoning Board of Adjustment. I served seven years as a full time member on the Zoning Board. Within the seven years, I was secretary for three years and vice chair for three years. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: Nonw List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 Jimmy Jones Reference 1 Phone (919) 740 -7313 Reference 2 Joan Dorry Reference 2 Phone (845) 642 -1463 Reference 3 Jerry Dunn Reference 3 Phone (845) 499 -7081 Upload additional information. • Mikeres13.pdf Date 06/11/2020 Consent Board of Commissioders - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 16 V1 understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. TZ'Ec E i V E BOC OFF. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 17 WILMINGTON, NC 28412 MICHAEL SANCLIMENTI CELL - 7326164982 E -MAIL - MICHAELSANCLIMENTI @ATT.NET OBJECTIVE Accomplished technology professional with extensive experience in information technology, Integration network architecture, design, development, and security for Fortune 500 corporations. Certifications Information Assurance, Master of Science June 2007 —June 2009 ISC2 - CISSP PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES #84886 Dec. 2005 Brings deep technical expertise and detailed knowledge of information technology, security, Skills network architecture, and technical integration Feature Confident, influential and trusted by colleagues and in client- facing situations Development Lifecycle: Provides effective, decisive team leadership Architecture, Communicates well with people of varying backgrounds and expertise, including technologists, Feature Design, security specialists, project managers and business customers Configuration, Well organized, methodical and self- motivating, takes ownership of solutions Testing, Engineering and Solves business problems through the application of technology Troubleshooting, Stays on top of the latest trends, and acquires new skills quickly and independently Documentation, Tier 4 Support EDUCATION Integration Technologies: Information Assurance, Master of Science June 2007 —June 2009 Layer 2 WAN Norwich University, Northfield, Vermont protocols, MPLS, Graduated Cum Laude IPv4, IPv6, TCP, UDP, Routing Protocols, Studies focused on the comprehensive exploration of the information security life cycle and its Multicast, QoS, growing importance to an organization in achieving its strategic and tactical objectives. Security WARS, IPSec, SSL, case studies furnished upon request. Firewall, Intrusion Prevention Political Science, Bachelor of Arts September 1994 — May 1999 Systems Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey Infrastructure: Cisco ISR (G1 & G2) EXPERIENCE and legacy routers, Catalyst switches, Senior Consultant February 2009 — Present IOS, Cisco WAAS, AT &T Consulting Nexus 7000 & 7700, 5600, 2300, FabricPath, OTV, Provide solutions to complex network infrastructure and security projects. ASA 5500X, Current Project: California Corrections Healthcare System. Security Technology FirePower, WSA, Consultant. Implementation of the new Firepower Management Center (FMC) and multiple vSMA Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) for the agency's 50+ institutions, regional offices, and HQ. Project Network Tools: includes configuration of FTDs and FMC, Access Control, IPS, and AMP security policies, EIGRP Wireshark, with authentication utilizing Flexconfig, and High Availability. Trained staff in security operations Network General to investigate and mitigate IPS and AMP alerts. Implemented URL Filtering, whitelists, blacklists, Sniffer, Netflow, IAB, Safe Search, and other features. Spirent Smart Windows & Smart Flow, SolarWinds Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 18 Implemented a new security network infrastructure to facilitate the migration of all services that are currently identified and hosted in the existing datacenter. The telecommunications center in Stockton CA. (STX) hosts electronic medical applications for the treatment and care of their patients and build and support a business continuity solution to be served for Disaster Recovery of CCHCS applications and solutions. Implemented a new Telecommunications Center that serves as the secondary telecommunications center and the support of disaster recovery services. Implementation, planning, and engineering of ASA firewalls (5545 redeployment and 5585 deployment), FirePower IPS, and Web Security Appliance and virtual Security Management Appliance. Basic QoS functionality to address performance of remote sites /STX traffic types and flows. Completed Proiects: Dallas Cowboys. Infrastructure engineer for the design and implementation of a data center at the Dallas Cowboys Frisco Complex. The network infrastructure will consist of Nexus 7710, Nexus 5600s, FEX 2300s and 2200s, Catalyst 4500 and 3850 switches, and ASA firewalls. Starwood Hotels & Resorts. Network Engineer. Discovery and analysis of Starwood Hotels and Resorts network infrastructure for the implementation of AT &T's IP Flex SIP Offering. This is a multiphase project to implement SIP for the Starwood contact centers. Fiserv. Network Engineer. Pre and post sales of new and existing Fisery customers. Migration of existing Fisery customers from AT &T and Verizon's Frame Relay to their respective MPLS networks. Included in the migration is VPN design and Disaster Recovery. Involved in the successful rollout of GETVPN for Fiserv's largest clients. UBS. Senior Network Operator. Provide Tier 2 support for the UBS financial organizations. Resolve complex issues involving routing and switching. EBay. Assist the organization in the finalization of a QoS framework, policies and configuration templates for the equipment that is standardized across the Enterprise footprint. In addition, EBay has requested input and guidance on how the organization can operationalize the provisioning and management of QoS moving forward. Archer Daniels Midland Company. Network Engineer for the relocation of ADM's data center from corporate headquarters to the AT &T Hosting facility in Lisle, IL. Marsh & McLennan. Solutions Architect for the IPv6 assessment. The position involves evaluation of the network for IPv6 compliance, recommendations, and a road map to IPv6. BBDO. Network Engineer for the design of a new primary and backup data center. Project included design of Nexus 7000, Nexus 5500, Nexus 2200, VDCs, and OTV. Oracle. Instructor responsible for teaching MPLS & BGP to Oracle's network engineers. Henry Schein. Security Engineer created a data classification program. The project included classification recommendation, implementation, and road map. The Hartford Ins. Network Engineer reviewing the VoIP network. This involved reviewing the Cisco and Juniper environment and recommending solutions to mitigate voice quality issues and improve the overall network performance. San Francisco General Hospital. Solution Architect for the design and implementation of both wired and wireless medical grade network. The infrastructure consists of Cisco Nexus switches, Catalyst switches, wireless products, and security products. Clorox. Lead Architect to develop a next generation WAN strategy for a consumer products company. The strategy includes MPLS, Internet, Performance Routing, Intelligence Routing, Cloud Computing, WAN Optimization, and Mobility and BYOD. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 19 Orion Network Management Operating Systems: Windows, Unix, Linux Compliance: FISMA, FIPS, NIST 800, HIPAA Flextronics. Lead Engineer for the implementation of a new data center infrastructure consisting of Cisco's Nexus 7000, 5500, and FabricPath. Pace Suburban Bus Company. Lead Engineer for the implementation of a new data center infrastructure consisting of Cisco's Nexus 7000, 2000, and upgrades to the existing Catalyst 6500E series switches Diversified Agency Services, a division of Omnicom Group. Lead Architect to review and recommend network technologies for the framework of the new DAS network that will serve the 190 organizations that comprise the Omnicom Group. Avayo. Network assessment to ensure the network is designed and deployed in an optimized manner and that the network is scalable, highly available and adaptive in order to meet current and future needs. In addition, assess performance issues with their video conferencing and focus on the availability, scalability and performance. Pitney Bowes Inc. WAN assessment for their global operations and manufacturing sites to support VoIP, video conference, and Microsoft OCS video services. Analyzed current bandwidth utilizations and QoS configuration. Recommended a new QoS strategy to support voice and video by suggesting a 6COS approach and upgrades to bandwidth and routers. Becton Dickinson Inc. Network LAN assessment for their global operations and manufacturing sites. Networks have up -to -date and outdated equipment. Will report to management analysis of LAN environments with recommendations on equipment upgrade path and overall costs for the upgrades. Weight Watchers Inc. Completion of a data center assessment. Discovered and reported on positive and negatives aspects of the data center design and operations. Made the necessary recommendation to solve the flaws and risks. State of Georgia. Completion of security -based IT projects. Projects included architect for cloud security and architect for secure remote access for agencies. This includes site -to -site IPSec, client -based IPSec, and SSL. Equipment used for design was Cisco, Juniper, Crossbeam, and CheckPoint. All secure remote access projects complied with NIST 800 and FIPS. Mars Candy Inc. Successful installation of a firewall for PCI compliance. The company was launching a retail business and needed to be PCI compliant. ASA firewalls and 3750 switches were installed, programmed, and tested. Customer passed the PCI audit. Estee Lauder Inc. Completed QoS project. Project accomplishments were identifying Voice, video, and data traffic. Reviewing existing QoS and recommendations for new a QoS solution consisting of 4 and 6 COS. Senior Member of Technical Staff July 2002 — February 2009 AT &T Labs, Middletown, New Jersey Research and development for AT &T's Managed Router Services for the Enhanced VPN (EVPN) and AT &T VPN (AVPN) Offer. Primary responsibilities are the development, test, and support of CE router features. Senior Systems Engineer February 2001 —July 2002 Flash Networks, Holmdel, New Jersey Pre and post sales support for the Net -Gain 1100 wireless software products, which enhanced the performance of Internet traffic for wireless data networks. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 20 Distinguish Member Consulting Staff October 1995 — February 2001 Lucent Technologies (formerly INS), Holmdel, New Jersey Specializes in a number of areas, including enterprise and service provider telecommunications and infrastructure projects. Performed a number of roles related to network architecture design, build and operations. Responsibilities included pre and post sales engineer, network design, and operations support. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 21 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Nicholas Silivanch < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:26 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Nicholas Silivanch Email nick(oeccrenc.com Home Address 1205 Beeston Court Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Mai) It Home Phone (910) 515 -7969 Cell Phone (910) 515 -7969 Business Phone (910) 399 -4602 Fax (910) 399 -4675 Years living in New Hanover County 17 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Male Race American Age 34 1 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 22 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer Eastern Carolina Commercial Real Estate Occupation Commercial Real Estate Broker Professional Activities Currently sit on the board of Directors for the Regional Commercial Real Estate Alliance / MILS Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? I believe that it is imperative that practitioners in the Commercial Real Estate Development community help in safeguarding properties and their values while also helping to create and craft areas for smart development and growth. Not every tree needs to be cut down, but along major thoroughfares it makes sense to have commercial on the road frontage instead of residential homes. The planning board now more then ever must look at the realties that exist as the amount of vacant land dwindles and the redevelopment of existing parcels will become more prevalent in the years to come. We don't need to say no to growth, we need to say yes to smart growth and well designed projects to benefit the community. What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? The growth along the new bypass corridor in Poters Neck / Murrayville neighborhoods will be affected by it, making sure that the new development in this area makes the best use possible of creating commercial nodes, intersected with multifamily and residential makes the most sense. The other area of growth will be Castle Hayne, i believe insuring that smart growth is vital to this area of the county as the Cape Fear River is one of our best resources and ensuring that it is protected will be vital to future generations. Qualifications for serving: I have been a commercial realtor for many years, helping business's and developers find sites that fit thier needs, getting plans for development approved and working to also meet the goals of the county. I worked as a developer for affordable housing across the state prior to that and believe in the need and growth for affordable housing in our area is needed. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: Previously served on the Port Waterway and Beach Commission List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 Mark Johnson Reference 1 Phone (703) 244 -6113 Reference 2 David Branton Reference 2 Phone (704) 740 -8184 Reference 3 Jonathan Washburn Reference 3 Phone (910) 352 -2846 2 Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 23 Date 06/22/2020 Consent V I understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 24 Kianpour, Dahria From: application @webformsnhcgov.com on behalf of Steven Weitzner < application @webformsnhcgov.com> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 3:22 PM To: Crowell, Kym; Kianpour, Dahria Subject: Application for New Hanover County Planning Board Board or Committee being applied to: New Hanover County Planning Board Name Steven Weitzner Email sweitznr gmail.com Home Address 2204 Moreland Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 United States Map It Mailing Address (if different from home address) United States Map It Home Phone (910) 679 -8795 Cell Phone (631) 912 -5018 Years living in New Hanover County 4.5 Personal information collected below is to assure a cross - section of the community is represented. Gender Male Race white Age 69 Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? No Applicant's Employer Retired Board of CommissioAers - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 25 Occupation Retired Media Executive Professional Activities Mentor media professionals and advise media company owners in my consulting practice, Longboat Media Advisors. Volunteer Activities Delivery of food to Sunset Elementary students as part of Nourish NC program. Why do you wish to serve on this board or committee? As a resident who relocated here from Long Island, NY, I would like to help New Hanover avoid some of the pitfalls Suffolk County fell into during an era of rapid growth. I am interested in the full -range of New Hanover's growth opportunities and challenges (adequacy of services to citizens, residential and commercial development, traffic, educational infrastructure, etc). What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? Review of comprehensive plan and its application throughout the county. Plans to deal with traffic congestion. Qualifications for serving: Before retiring, I managed public and private companies across a wide scale of employee numbers and revenue amounts for twenty years. I have broad experience in strategic planning, budget planning and management, and managing people and culture. My main interest is to serve my fellow citizens of this county by listening and understanding their views and representing their interest as the county continues to plan for exceptional growth over the next decade. Other municipal or county boards /committees on which you are serving: None List three local personal references and phone numbers: Reference 1 George Ed Tilley Reference 1 Phone (910) 508 -7400 Reference 2 Steve Miller Reference 2 Phone (901) 496 -7990 Reference 3 Karen Pappas Reference 3 Phone (910) 622 -4478 Date 06/08/2020 Consent VI understand that any board or committee appointee may be removed without cause by a majority of County Commissioners. M Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 13- 2 - 26 B O C OFF. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 230 Govemment Center Drive, Suite 175 Tepon, NC 28403 COMMITTEE APPLICATION Telephone (910) 79 &7149 FAX (910) 798 -7145 Board/Committee: Planning Name: John L Weaver E4,faii.thec.id69@outlook.com Home Address: 7110 Key Point Drive Wilmington 28405 e Mailing Address if different: (Cry) (zip Code) Home Phone: Fax: Ce11:843- 222 -0863 Business: Years living in New Hanover County. 23 Male: ✓ Female: Race: Fite Age: 72 (Information for the purpose of assuring a cross - section of the commundy) Do you have a family member employed by New Hanover County? If yes, name No Employer: Retired A person currently employed by the agency or department for which this application is made, must resign his/her posilion with New Hanover County upon appointment in accordance with Article Vl, Sec. 4 of the New Hanover County Personnel Policy. Furthermore, applicant should have no immediate family member employed by such agency or department. Occupation: Retired County Administrator /County Attorney Professional Activities: (SC) SC Bar; Chamber of Commerce; SC Association of Counties Volunteer Activities: Church committees; civic organizations; The Citadel Alumni /Foundation Why do you wish to serve on this board1committee? Having been raised on Airlie Road and returning home now, I believe my planning experience may be of some benefit to New Hanover County. Conflict of Interest: If aboard member believes he/she has a conflict or potential conflict of interest on a particular issue, that member should state this belief to the other members of his/her respective board during a public meeting. The member should state the nature of the conflict detailing that he/she has a separate, private, or monetary interest either direct or indirect, in the issue under consideration. The member should then excuse himselfftrself from voting on the matter What areas of concern would you like to see addressed by this committee? NHC ' s ongoing competing interests between quality of life and continued commercial /residential development. Qualifications forserving: I have 20 years of county government management experience, with extensive planning department oversight and as planning commission advisory counsel. Other municipal or county boarcWcommittees on which you are serving: List three local personal references and phone numbers: 1. William Allen Cobb (910) 617 -5744 2. Rick Wetherill (910) 617 -0313 B Dom: July 22, 2019 P� (oCz2lS ignature 1 �-- Applications are kept on file for 18 months I understand that any board or co#mittee appointee may be removed Please use reverse side for additional comfn without cause by a ma�ority of Co rnty Commissioners. d of Commissioners - Jul 13, 2 20 ITEM: 13- 2 - 27 NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/13/2020 Additional Items DEPARTMENT: County Manager PRESENTER(S): Commissioner Barfield CONTACT(S): Commissioner Barfield SUBJECT: Renaming of Hugh MacRae Park BRIEF SUMMARY: RECOMMENDED MOTION AND REQUESTED ACTIONS: COUNTY MANAGER'S COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (only Manager) COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS: A motion to change the name of Hugh MacRae Park to Long Leaf Park was approved 3 -2, Commissioners White and Kusek dissenting. Board of Commissioners - July 13, 2020 ITEM: 14